Agenda packet, regular meeting — Cypress City Council, August 25, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING

CYPRESS CITY COUNCIL
August 25, 2025
5:00 P.M. - Closed Session
6:00 P.M. - General Session
www.cypressca.org 5275 Orange Avenue
Cypress, California
Interested in speaking to the City Council? Information about participating in the City Council meeting appears at the end of the agenda.

CALL TO ORDER
5:00 P.M.

Executive Board Room

ROLL CALL
Cypress City Council, also acting as the Ex-Officio Governing Board of Directors of the Cypress Recreation and Park District
Mayor David Burke
Mayor Pro Tem Leo Medrano
Council Member Kyle Chang
Council Member Scott Minikus
Council Member Bonnie Peat
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION / WORKSHOP ITEMS (Limited to 30 minutes - three minutes per speaker. The City Council may adjust the time allotted per speaker.) The public may address the City Council on Closed Session/Workshop items prior to any action taken. Although Council Members may provide brief responses, the City Council may not engage in a discussion with members of the public during the meeting. Please complete a Speaker's Card to address the City Council in-person. Members of the public are encouraged to communicate with the City Council via email at [email protected] or by calling 714-229-6699.

CLOSED SESSION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
Title: Acting/Interim City Manager
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: Fred Galante, City Attorney Unrepresented employee: Acting/Interim City Manager

RECONVENE
6:00 P.M.

Council Chambers

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

REPORT OF CLOSED SESSION / WORKSHOP
City Manager/City Attorney
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ON AGENDA ITEMS (Three minutes per speaker. The City Council may adjust the time allotted per speaker.)
The public may address the City Council on agenda items prior to any action taken. Although Council Members may provide brief responses, the City Council may not engage in a discussion with members of the public during the meeting. Please complete a Speaker's Card to address the City Council in-person. Please follow the instructions at the end of the agenda and wait for the Mayor/City Clerk to call on you to address the City Council virtually. Speakers providing in-person comments will be called first. Members of the public are encouraged to communicate with the City Council via email at [email protected] or by calling 714-229-6699.

CONSENT CALENDAR
August 25, 2025 | Page 2

CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed on the Consent Calendar are to be approved with one motion unless a Council Member requests separate action on a specific item. Council Members voting no or abstaining on a Consent Calendar item may do so without removing the item from the Consent Calendar.

1. Introduce and/or Adopt All Ordinances and Resolutions Presented for Consideration by Title Only and to Waive Further Reading

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds with Purdue and Certain of its Affiliates and the Sackler Family
Prepared by: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City to enter into the Settlement Agreement with Purdue and certain of its affiliates and the Sackler family to resolve lawsuits accusing pharmacy chains of mishandling opioid pain drugs, agree to the terms of the related State-Subdivision Agreement, and authorize entry into the related State-Subdivision Agreement with the Attorney General.

3. Receive an Update on the Strategic Plan Six-Month Objectives Prepared by: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Recommendation: Receive an update on the Strategic Plan six-month objectives.

4. Accept the Concrete Rehabilitation (Phase Two), Project 414 Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation:

1. Accept the Concrete Rehabilitation (Phase Two), Project 414, in the amount of $106,179.64 and approve the final payment of $5,308.98 to CT&T Concrete Paving Inc.; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with County Recorder.

5. Accept the Orange Avenue Rehabilitation, Project 315 Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation:

1. Accept the Orange Avenue Rehabilitation, Project 315, in the amount of $649,995.41 and approve the final payment of $32,499.77 to Hardy & Harper, Inc.; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with County Recorder.

August 25, 2025 | Page 3

6. Accept the Sewer System Improvements, Project 385
Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation:

1. Accept the Sewer System Improvements, Project 385, in the amount of $232,080.08 and approve the final retention payment of $11,604 to Vortex Technologies, LCC; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder.

7. Reject All Bids for City Hall East Wing HVAC Replacement, Project 379 Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation: Reject all bids for City Hall East Wing HVAC Replacement, Project 379.

8. Approve Plans and Specifications and Award Contract for Accessible Pedestrian Signals, Project 407
Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation:

1. Approve Plans and Specifications for Accessible Pedestrian Signals, Project 407; and

2. Award a contract to Yunex LLC for $434,095 and authorize a contingency of $65,000.

9. Approve Final Tract Map No. 19339 for 5732 Lincoln Avenue Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation: Approve Final Tract Map No. 19339 and the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

10. Receive and File a Residential Parking Permit District Petition and Set a Public Hearing
Prepared by: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the petition to establish a Residential Parking Permit District on Surrey Drive, Lexington Street, Livermore Place, Manchester Place, Dorset Drive, Somerset Lane, Sussex Circle, Dover Circle, and Devon Circle between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.; and

2. Set a public hearing for September 8, 2025, to consider establishing the Residential Parking Permit District.

August 25, 2025 | Page 4

11. Approve an Increase to a Task Order with RSG, Inc. for Buyer Verification Services for the Citrus Square Senior Community
Prepared by: Alicia Velasco, Planning Director
Recommendation: Increase the task order with RSG, Inc. for buyer verification services to $91,128, and authorize a 10% contingency.

12. Receive and File the Investment Reports for the Months Ended June 30, 2025 and July 31, 2025.

Prepared by: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Recommendation: Receive and file the attached investment reports.

13. Receive and File Register of Warrants, Transfers, and Wires Issued for the Period of June 7, 2025 through August 8, 2025
Prepared by: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Recommendation: Receive and file the attached payment register summarized below for the period of June 7, 2025 through August 8, 2025:

Electronic Funds Transfers 17393 through 17818
Warrants 68117 through 68599
Payroll Transfers W1558 through W1562

NEW BUSINESS

14. Approve First Reading of an Ordinance Updating Municipal Code Section 17 Relating to Smoking Regulations and Potentially Provide Direction for Additional Regulations
Prepared by: Fred Galante, City Attorney
Recommendation:

1. Approve the first reading of an Ordinance, by title only, updating Municipal Code Section 17 to align smoking regulations to State law; and

2. Potentially provide direction for additional regulations.

15. Receive a Report from the Ad Hoc Subcommittee to Consider Options to Ensure the Future Sustainability of the Cypress Community Festival Prepared by: Ad Hoc Subcommittee, Mayor Burke and Council Member Peat Recommendation: Receive a report from the ad hoc subcommittee to consider options to ensure the future sustainability of the Cypress Community Festival.

ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
August 25, 2025 | Page 5
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Three minutes per speaker. The City Council may adjust the time allotted per speaker.)
The public may address the City Council on any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Although Council Members may provide brief responses, the City Council may not discuss nor take action on items that are not on the agenda. Please complete a Speaker's Card to address the City Council in-person. Members of the public are encouraged to communicate with the City Council via email at [email protected] or by calling 714-229-6699.

COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS FROM CITY-AFFILIATED BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

AND REMARKS
Bridges at Kraemer Place Community Advisory Board - July 23 Orange County Fire Authority - June 26
Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District - August 21 Orange County Sanitation District - June 25 and July 23

COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION

CITY MANAGER REMARKS

ADJOURNMENT - IN MEMORY OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF DETECTIVES

JOSHUA KELLEY-EKLUND, VICTOR LEMUS, AND WILLIAM OSBORN
The next meeting will be an adjourned Regular Meeting, to be held on Monday, September 8, 2025, beginning at 5:30 p.m. in the Executive Board Room.

Council Members and the public should promptly exit the meeting room following adjournment.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing Agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 21st day of August, 2025.

________________________________
Alisha Farnell, City Clerk
August 25, 2025 | Page 6

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Members of the public can participate in the City Council meeting in the following ways:

1. Attend In-Person. First-come, first-served seating is available. All attendees must be free of any symptoms associated with contagious illnesses.

2. Attend Virtually via Webinar. Follow this link:
https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5994895184734589529. Advanced registration is recommended.

The public may address the City Council virtually during Oral Communications on Agenda Items and Public Hearings. Virtual participants must click the 'hand raise' button prior to the end of the first in-person speaker to indicate they wish to address the City Council. Upon clicking the 'hand raise' button, please unmute your microphone and wait for the Mayor/City Clerk to call on you. = Hand Raise = Unmute

3. Submit Public Comments Prior to the Meeting. The public may submit comments via email to [email protected]. Comments submitted by 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be added to the meeting record.

4. Watch the Meeting. The City Council meeting can be viewed on Spectrum Cable Channel 36 or on the City's website at www.cypressca.org/watchlive.

5. Listen to the Meeting. Listen-only teleconferencing is available by calling (562) 247-8422 and entering Access Code 646-741-224. No registration or audio pin is necessary.

INVOCATION POLICY
The City Council does not endorse the content of the invocation and does not endorse the invocational speaker’s particular faith, belief and/or religious denomination. The City Council has an established neutral policy for selecting and scheduling invocational speakers. The City Council’s policy on invocations is available from the City Clerk.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the City Clerk at (714) 229-6685 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

August 25, 2025 | Page 7
CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 2.

FROM: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution approving the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds with Purdue and Certain of its Affiliates and the Sackler Family

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City to enter into the Settlement Agreement with Purdue and certain of its affiliates and the Sackler family to resolve lawsuits accusing pharmacy chains of mishandling opioid pain drugs, agree to the terms of the related State-Subdivision Agreement, and authorize entry into the related State-Subdivision Agreement with the Attorney General.

DISCUSSION
In 2021, the City Council approved participation in national opioid settlements with drug-makers and distributors (attached). As part of these settlements, the City agreed to a very broad release of opioid-related claims against the settling defendants, which included both known and unknown claims. At the same time, the City Council approved a Distributor Allocation Agreement with the State of California which governs the allocation, distribution and use of settlement fund payments made to California. Amounts allocated to Cypress from these settlement agreements and the proceeds may only be used for opioid remediation activities. Proceeds will be passed on to the County of Orange, who will coordinate remediation activities.

A new nationwide settlement has been reached with Purdue and certain of its affiliates and the Sackler family to resolve lawsuits accusing pharmacy chains of mishandling opioid pain drugs. This nationwide settlement is part of a third round of settlements with retail pharmacy companies that followed the 2021 settlements with drug-makers and distributors and has included settlements in 2023 with Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart, and again in 2024 with Kroger.

Approval of the attached Resolution would authorize the City Manager to carry out all necessary acts to allow the City to participate in this settlement agreement, including the execution and transmittal of all required documents. If the City Council chooses not to participate, Cypress' allocation will be redistributed to other agencies participating in the settlement rather than being passed on to the County of Orange.

BUDGET IMPACT
The actual amount the City will receive (and pass through to the County) from the settlement depends on a variety of factors, including the number of California municipalities participating.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the attached Resolution.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
December 2021 Agenda Item
Settlement Document Package
Resolution
3/30/23, 11:15 AM Print Agenda Item
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1652&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=29773 1/3

CITY OF CYPRESS

CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular Item # 7.

FROM: Fred Galante, City Attorney
DATE: 12/13/2021
SUBJECT: Approve Participation in the National Opioid Settlements

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council consider and take the following actions:

1. Approve Settlement Participation Form for the City’s participation in the National Opioid Settlement with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and AmerisourceBergen Corporation; and

2. Approve Settlement Participation Form for the City’s participation in the National Opioid Settlement with Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.; and

3. Approve the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Distributor Settlement; and

4. Approve the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Janssen Settlement; and

5. Adopt a Resolution approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute the documents identified in Recommendation Nos. 1 through 4; and

6. Authorize the City Manager to carry out all necessary acts such that the City can participate in the National Opioid Settlements, including, but not limited to, the transmittal of the executed documents in Recommendation Nos. 1 through 4.

SUMMARY
Various states, counties, and cities have been in litigation with the McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and AmerisourceBergen Corporation. (collectively, the “Distributors”) and Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. (collectively, the “Manufacturer”) (for purposes of this report, the Distributors and Manufacturer are collectively referred to as the “Settling Defendants”). The litigation concerns the distribution and manufacture of opioids that have contributed to the opioid addiction epidemic in the United States. Two tentative settlements have been reached with the Distributors and Manufacturer, respectively (“National Opioids Settlements”). A “critical mass” of participation by 3/30/23, 11:15 AM Print Agenda Item
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1652&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=29773 2/3 states, cities and counties must be achieved in order to proceed. This critical mass is determined by the Settling Defendants in their sole discretion. If a critical mass is not achieved, then the National Opioids Settlements do not proceed and the litigation continues. There are two parts to achieving critical mass: first, a critical mass of states must be achieved and, second, a critical mass of cities and counties must be achieved. At this stage, a critical mass of state participation has already occurred.

DISCUSSION
Assuming there is a critical mass to proceed, the payout amounts under the settlements with the Settling Defendants is contingent upon various factors, including the number of states, cities, and counties participating, with a maximum payout of $21 billion over the course of 18 years by the Distributors and $5 billion over no more than nine years by the Manufacturer to all participating entities. A fraction of that amount will be received by California, its counties, and cities. The actual amount for the City is dependent on a number of variables, including, but not limited to, the number of California cities and counties participating, whether or not cities later sue the Settling Defendants, and certain actions that may be taken by the State of California. Further, the City’s share of the potential amount is determined using three factors: (1) Opioid use disorder; (2) Opioid deaths; and (3) Opioid dosage. If the City participates, the funds will automatically be allocated to the County unless the City opts to receive the funds directly; however, there are certain reporting and tracking requirements if the City receives the funds directly (see below).

By participating in the National Opioid Settlements, the City would be agreeing to a very broad release of claims relating in any way to opioids against the Settling Defendants, which includes both known and unknown claims. However, not participating and litigating on its own means that the City is required to comply with very strict deadlines with respect to litigation.

The National Opioids Settlements will allow for a range of approved abatement uses, which includes a range of intervention, treatment, education, and recovery services. However, the use of funds are restricted to the abatement uses, including 50% per calendar year on high impact abatement uses, identified in the settlements (see, e.g., Attachments 3 and 4, and Exhibit E of Attachments 6 and 7).

There are also significant public reporting and tracking requirements on the expenditures for such funds, which may make County receipt and expenditure of such funds more desirable. For example, the settlement with the Manufacturer would require the following reporting and tracking:

1. Preparation of annual written reports regarding the use of the funds. This report must include a certification that all funds received have been used in compliance with the Manufacturer settlement agreements. This report must be in a form that is approved by the California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”).

2. The City would be required to track all deposits and expenditures.

3. Funds not used for a permitted purpose must be identified and included in the annual report (including any attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs). This information must also be reported to the Manufacturer and the settlement fund administrator.

In terms of enforcement, if DHCS believes that the use of settlement funds is inconsistent with the requirements, it must meet and confer with subdivision (i.e., the City), and if not resolved, DHCS may perform an audit. If the issue is not resolved, DHCS can bring a motion or action in court to resolve the concern or to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement/state-allocation agreement.

There are also time limits on expenditure where money not expended or encumbered within 5 years of receipt must be transferred to the State. However, these requirements only apply to the City if it elects to receive direct distribution and does not apply if the funds go to the County.

The National Opioids Settlements also provide for injunctive relief that requires changes to the Distributors’ and Manufacturer’s conduct. This includes the creation of a clearinghouse through which the Distributors will be required to account for their own shipments and the shipments of the 3/30/23, 11:15 AM Print Agenda Item
https://destinyhosted.com/print_ag_memo.cfm?seq=1652&rev_num=0&mode=External&reloaded=true&id=29773 3/3 other distributors, in order to detect, stop, and report suspicious opioids orders. In addition, the Manufacturer (which ceased marketing opioids in 2015 and ceased selling opioids in 2020) will not market or sell any opioid products in the next ten years and has agreed to cease lobbying concerning prescription opioids for ten years.

Approval of Recommendation Nos. 1 and 2 would authorize the City to participate in the National Opioid Settlements with the Settling Defendants on the terms and conditions of those settlement agreements. (Attachments 1 and 2)
Approval of Recommendation Nos. 3 and 4 would approve agreements with the State of California on the distribution and use of settlement funds, consistent with the National Settlement Agreements. (Attachments 3 and 4)
Approval of Recommendation No. 5 would approve and authorize the City Manager to execute all documentation necessary to participate in the National Opioid Settlements. (Attachment 5) Approval of Recommendation No. 6 would authorize the City Manager to carry out all necessary acts to allow the City to participate in the National Opioid Settlements, including the transmittal of the above-mentioned executed documents.

City Council approval and authorization to execute, submit, and receipt of all required documents must be completed before January 2, 2022.

BUDGET IMPACT
Use of funds are restricted to the abatement of impacts of the opioid epidemic, including 50% per calendar year on high impact abatement uses, identified in the settlements. The actual amounts the City will receive depends on various factors, such as the number of California jurisdictions that participate in the settlement.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney prepared the report.

APPROVED
BY:

Peter Grant, City Manager
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Nat'l Opioid Settlement Form
Attachment 2 - Janssen Opioid Settlement Form
Attachment 3 - Final State Agreement Distributors Settlement Attachment 4 - Final State Janssen Agreement Settlement Attachment 5 - Resolution Authorizing CM to Sign Settlement Attachment 6 - Final Distributor Settlement Agreement
Attachment 7 - Janssen Agreement
New National Opioids Settlement: Purdue
Opioids Implementation Administrator
[email protected]
Cypress city, CA
Reference Number: CL-1730553
TO LOCAL POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS:

THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS DOCUMENTATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE NEW NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT. YOU MUST TAKE ACTION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE.

Deadline: September 30, 2025
A new proposed national opioids settlement has been reached with Purdue (and certain of its affiliates) and the Sackler family. This Participation Package is a followup communication to the Notice of New National Opioids Settlement recently received electronically by your subdivision.

The proposed settlement is being implemented in connection with Purdue’s bankruptcy proceedings, and consists of, among other things, a settlement of Purdue’s claims against the Sacklers and certain other parties (referred to as the “Purdue Estate Settlement”), and settlements of direct claims against the Sacklers held by States, local governments and other creditors (collectively, the “Purdue Direct Settlement”, and together with the Estate Settlement, the “Purdue Settlement”). The Purdue Direct Settlement for States and local governments is documented in the Governmental Entity and Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement.

You are receiving this Participation Package because all eligible States and territories, including California, are participating in the Purdue Direct Settlement.

This electronic envelope contains:
 The Participation Form for the Purdue Direct Settlement, including a release of any claims; and
 The Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement (“California StateSubdivision Agreement”), which governs the allocation, distribution, and use of abatement funds from the Purdue Settlement paid to California.

The Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement must be executed, without alteration, and submitted on or before September 30, 2025, in order for your subdivision to be considered for initial participation calculations and payment eligibility under the Purdue Direct Settlement.

Based upon subdivision participation forms received on or before September 30, 2025, the subdivision participation rate will be used to determine whether Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B participation is sufficient for the Purdue Settlement to move forward and whether a state earns its maximum potential payment under the Purdue Direct Settlement. If the Purdue Settlement moves forward and goes effective, your release will become effective. If the Purdue Settlement does not move forward, that release will not become effective.

Any subdivision that does not participate in the Purdue Direct Settlement cannot directly share in the Purdue Direct Settlement funds, even if other subdivisions in the state are participating and sharing in those Purdue Direct Settlement funds. Any subdivision that does not participate may also reduce the amount of money for programs to remediate the opioid crisis in its state. Please note, a subdivision will not necessarily directly receive Purdue Settlement funds by participating; decisions on how Purdue Settlement funds will be allocated within a state are subject to intrastate agreements or state statutes.

You are encouraged to discuss the terms and benefits of the Purdue Settlement with your counsel, your Attorney General’s Office, and other contacts within your state.

The State of California, along with a group of cities and counties, negotiated the California State-Subdivision Agreement, which governs the allocation, distribution, and use of abatement funds from the Purdue Settlement paid to California. The allocation of abatement funds will be similar to the allocation in the prior opioids settlements, where the vast majority (85%) of abatement funds is expected to go to local governments.

Information and documents regarding the Purdue Settlement, including a complete copy of the Governmental Entity and Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement, and how it is being implemented in your state and how funds will be allocated within your state can be found on the national settlement website at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/purdue-sacklers-settlements/. This website will be supplemented as additional documents are created.

How to return signed forms:

There are three methods for returning the executed Participation Form and any supporting documentation to the Implementation Administrator:
(1)Electronic Signature via DocuSign: Executing the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement electronically through DocuSign will return the signed form and agreement to the Implementation Administrator and associate your form and agreement with your subdivision’s records.

Electronic signature is the most efficient method for returning the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement, allowing for more timely participation and the potential to meet higher settlement payment thresholds, and is therefore strongly encouraged.
(2)Manual Signature returned via DocuSign: DocuSign allows forms to be downloaded, signed manually, then uploaded to DocuSign and returned automatically to the Implementation Administrator. Please be sure to complete Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B all fields. As with electronic signature, returning a manually signed Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement via DocuSign will associate your signed form and agreement with your subdivision’s records. (3)Manual Signature returned via electronic mail: If your subdivision is unable to return an executed Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement using DocuSign, the signed Participation Form and California StateSubdivision Agreement may be returned via electronic mail to [email protected]. Please include the name, state, and reference ID of your subdivision in the body of the email and use the subject line Settlement Participation Form – [Subdivision Name, Subdivision State] – [Reference ID].

Detailed instructions on how to sign and return the Participation Form and California State-Subdivision Agreement, including changing the authorized signer, can be found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/purdue-sacklers-settlements/. You may also contact [email protected].

YOU MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE PURDUE DIRECT SETTLEMENT BY RETURNING YOUR PARTICIPATION FORM AND CALIFORNIA STATESUBDIVISION AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS OF THE PURDUE SETTLEMENT.

Please note that this is NOT a solicitation or a request for subdivisions to submit votes on the Purdue bankruptcy plan. This settlement package only pertains to a decision to participate in the Purdue Direct Settlement. If you receive a package to vote on the plan you should follow the applicable instructions for voting. PLEASE NOTE THAT VOTING ON THE PLAN IS SEPARATE FROM PARTICIPATION IN THE PURDUE DIRECT SETTLEMENT.

The sign-on period for subdivisions ends on September 30, 2025.

If you have any questions about executing the Participation Form, please contact your counsel, the Implementation Administrator at
[email protected], or the California Attorney General’s Office at [email protected].

Thank you,
Implementation Administrator for the Purdue Direct Settlement The Implementation Administrator is retained to provide the settlement notice required by the Purdue Direct Settlement to manage the collection of the participation forms for it.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision Participation and Release Form
Governmental Entity: Cypress city State: CA
Authorized Signatory: /officialname_purdue/
Address 1: /address1_purdue/
Address 2: /address2_purdue/
City, State, Zip: /cit_pd/ /state_pd/ /zi_pd/
Phone: /phone_purdue/
Email: /email_purdue/
The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to that certain Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement accompanying this participation form (the “Agreement”)1, and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Agreement, grant the releases set forth below, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Agreement, and agrees that by executing this Participation and Release Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Agreement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein.

2. The Governmental Entity shall promptly after the Effective Date, and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, dismiss with prejudice any Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com.

3. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Agreement pertaining to Participating Subdivisions as defined therein.

4. By agreeing to the terms of the Agreement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning following the Effective Date.

5. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Agreement solely for the purposes provided therein.

6. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as and to the extent provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the 1 Capitalized terms used in this Exhibit K but not otherwise defined in this Exhibit K have the meanings given to them in the Agreement or, if not defined in the Agreement, the Master Settlement Agreement.

K-1
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B Agreement. The Governmental Entity likewise agrees to arbitrate before the National Arbitration Panel as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent otherwise provided in, the Agreement.

7. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Agreement as provided therein.

8. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Agreement, including without limitation all provisions of Article 10 (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in his or her official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Subdivision Releasor, to the maximum extent of its authority, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby confirmed, the Shareholder Released Parties and Released Parties are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released and forever discharged by the Governmental Entity and its Subdivision Releasors from: any and all Causes of Action, including, without limitation, any Estate Cause of Action and any claims that the Governmental Entity or its Subdivision Releasors would have presently or in the future been legally entitled to assert in its own right (whether individually or collectively), notwithstanding section 1542 of the California Civil Code or any law of any jurisdiction that is similar, comparable or equivalent thereto (which shall conclusively be deemed waived), whether existing or hereinafter arising, in each case, (A) directly or indirectly based on, arising out of, or in any way relating to or concerning, in whole or in part, (i) the Debtors, as such Entities existed prior to or after the Petition Date, and their Affiliates, (ii) the Estates, (iii) the Chapter 11 Cases, or (iv) Covered Conduct and (B) as to which any conduct, omission or liability of any Debtor or any Estate is the legal cause or is otherwise a legally relevant factor (each such release, as it pertains to the Shareholder Released Parties, the “Shareholder Released Claims”, and as it pertains to the Released Parties other than the Shareholder Released Parties, the “Released Claims”). For the avoidance of doubt and without limiting the foregoing: the Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims include any Cause of Action that has been or may be asserted against any Shareholder Released Party or Released Party by the Governmental Entity or its Subdivision Releasors (whether or not such party has brought such action or proceeding) in any federal, state, or local action or proceeding (whether judicial, arbitral, or administrative) (A) directly or indirectly based on, arising out of, or in any way relating to or concerning, in whole or in part, (i) the Debtors, as such Entities existed prior to or after the Petition Date, and their Affiliates, (ii) the Estates, (iii) the Chapter 11 Cases, or (iv) Covered Conduct and (B) as to which any conduct, omission or liability of any Debtor or any Estate is the legal cause or is otherwise a legally relevant factor.

9. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Shareholder Released Claims or Released Claims against any Shareholder Released Party or Released Party in any forum whatsoever, subject in all respects to Section 9.02 of the Master Settlement Agreement. The releases provided for herein (including the term “Shareholder Released K-2
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B Claims” and “Released Claims”) are intended by the Governmental Entity and its Subdivision Releasors to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Shareholder Released Parties and Released Parties the broadest possible release of any liability relating in any way to Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Agreement shall be a complete bar to any Shareholder Released Claim and Released Claims.

10. To the maximum extent of the Governmental Entity’s power, the Shareholder Released Parties and the Released Parties are, as of the Effective Date, hereby released and discharged from any and all Shareholder Released Claims and Released Claims of the Subdivision Releasors.

11. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Agreement.

12. In connection with the releases provided for in the Agreement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Shareholder Released Claims or such other Claims released pursuant to this release, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date, any and all Shareholder Released Claims or such other Claims released pursuant to this release that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities’ decision to participate in the Agreement.

13. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Agreement, to which Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent any portion of this Participation and Release Form not relating to the release of, or bar against, liability is interpreted differently from the Agreement in any respect, the Agreement controls.

14. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in the Agreement, (x) nothing herein shall (A) release any Excluded Claims or (B) be construed to impair in any way the rights and obligations of any Person under the Agreement; and (y) the Releases set forth herein shall be subject to being deemed void to the extent set forth in Section 9.02 of the Master Settlement Agreement.

K-3
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Participation and Release Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_purdue/
Name: /name_1_purdue/
Title: /title_1_purdue/
Date: /date_1_purdue/
K-4
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 1 Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement
Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds
Purdue/Sackler Settlement

1. Introduction
The State of California1 and certain of its cities and counties have reached this proposed agreement (the “California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement” or the “Agreement”) to govern the payments made to California in In re: Purdue Pharma L.P., et al, Case No. 19- 23649, pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (the “Purdue Bankruptcy Matter”) and pursuant to the related settlement with the Sacklers.

This Agreement is proposed to govern the allocation, distribution, and use of payments, including the Statewide Payment Amounts, consisting of Base Payments and Incentive Payments, and Estate Distributions, paid to California pursuant to the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Direct Settlement Agreement (“GESA”), the Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”), the Thirteenth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Purdue Pharma L.P. and its Affiliated Debtors (the “Plan”), and the Governmental Remediation Trust Agreement (“GRTA”), and any revisions thereto (collectively, the “Governing Documents”), filed in the Purdue Bankruptcy Matter.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement does not apply to payments of attorneys’ fees and costs made to California, including any payments to California from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund and the State Expenses Fund and payments pursuant to Sections

9.01, 9.02, and 9.03 and Exhibit R of the GESA and Sections 5.9(a) and 5.9(b) of the Plan, unless otherwise noted.

Pursuant to Exhibit O, paragraph 4, of the GESA, acceptance of this California State-Subdivision Agreement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision.

2. Definitions
a) CA Participating Subdivision means a General Purpose Government that is a Participating Subdivision and also (a) a Plaintiff Subdivision; (b) a Primary Subdivision; and/or (c) a Non-Litigating Threshold Subdivision. For the avoidance of doubt, eligible CA Participating Subdivisions are those California Subdivisions listed in Exhibits C (excluding Litigating Special Districts), I, and/or W to the GESA. b) CA Litigating Special District means a Litigating Special District located in California. For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special District does not include School Districts and certain Health and Hospital Special Districts that fall under a separate creditor group in the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan. 1 For purposes of clarity, use of the term “California” refers to the geographic territory of California and the state and its local governments therein. The term “State” or “State of California” refers to the State of California as a governmental unit.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 2 c) Plaintiff Subdivision means a Subdivision located in California, other than a CA Litigating Special District, that filed a lawsuit, on behalf of the Subdivision and/or through an official of the Subdivision on behalf of the People of the State of California, against one or more Opioid Defendants prior to October 1, 2020. d) Opioid Defendant means any defendant (including but not limited to Alvogen, Inc.

Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC; Apotex Corp., Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp.; Indivior Inc.; Viatris Inc. a/k/a Mylan N.V.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.; Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc.; Kroger Co., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Allergan Finance, LLC, Allergan Limited, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Walgreen Co., Walmart Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., Cencora, Inc. f/k/a AmerisourceBergen Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Dr.

Richard S. Sackler, Beverly Sackler, Jonathan Sackler, David Sackler, Marianna Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler Lefcourt, Dr. Kathe Sackler, and Mortimer D.A. Sackler) named in a lawsuit seeking damages, abatement, or other remedies related to or caused by the opioid public health crisis in any lawsuit brought by any state or local government on or before October 1, 2020.

3. General Terms
This Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Governing Documents, as well as applicable law, and the Governing Documents govern over any inconsistent provision of this California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Governing Documents.

All payments made to the State of California and CA Participating Subdivisions subject to this Agreement will be used for Opioid Remediation, except as allowed by Section 5.02(b) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(ii) of the MSA.

This Agreement does not apply to funds received by California for attorneys’ fees and cost, including payments from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund or the State Expenses Fund, unless otherwise noted.

4. State Allocation
Funds allocated to California shall be combined pursuant to this Agreement, and 15% of that total shall be allocated to the State of California (the “State of California Allocation”), 70% to the California Abatement Accounts Fund (“CA Abatement Accounts Fund”), and 15% to the California Subdivision Fund (“CA Subdivision Fund”).

A. State of California Allocation
Fifteen percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the State and used by the State for future Opioid Remediation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 3 B. CA Abatement Accounts Fund
i. Allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) Seventy percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. The funds in the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be allocated based on the allocation model developed in connection with the proposed negotiating class in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804), as adjusted to reflect only those cities and counties that are eligible, based on population or litigation status, to become a CA Participating Subdivision. The percentage from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund allocated to each CA Participating Subdivision is set forth in Appendix 1 in the column entitled abatement percentage (the “Local Allocation”). For the avoidance of doubt, CA Litigating Special Districts and California towns, cities, and counties with a population less than 10,000 (except those that are Plaintiff Subdivisions) are not eligible to receive an allocation of CA Abatement Accounts Funds.
b) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a county, or a city and county, will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision, and will receive payments as provided in the Governing Documents and this Agreement. c) A CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, rather than to the city, so long as the county is a CA Participating Subdivision; provided, however, that if a city currently receives direct payment of its share of funds in the National Opioids Settlement with Distributors Cencora, Inc. (f/k/a AmerisourceBergenCorporation), Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation (the “Distributors Settlement”), that city’s Local Allocation amount will be paid directly to the city. A Local Allocation share allocated to a city but paid to a county is not required to be spent exclusively for abatement activities in that city, but will become part of the county’s share of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds, which will be used in accordance with Section 4.B.ii (Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds). d) A city within a county that is a CA Participating Subdivision may opt in or out of direct payment at any time, and it may also elect direct payment of only a portion of its share, with the remainder going to the county, by providing notice to the Settlement Administrator at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date. e) The State will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but has not, for a particular payment, become a Participating Subdivision. f) Funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision, and not expended or encumbered within five years of receipt and in accordance with the Governing Documents and this Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 4 Agreement shall be transferred to the State; provided however, that CA Participating Subdivisions have seven years to expend or encumber CA Abatement Accounts Funds designated to support capital outlay projects before they must be transferred to the State. ii. Use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds
a) The CA Abatement Accounts Funds will be used for future Opioid Remediation in one or more of the areas described in the List of Opioid Remediation Uses, which is Exhibit E to the GESA.
b) In addition to this requirement, no less than 50% of the funds received by a CA Participating Subdivision from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund in each calendar year will be used for one or more of the following High Impact Abatement Activities:
(1) the provision of matching funds or operating costs for substance use disorder facilities within the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program; (2) creating new or expanded Substance Use Disorder (“SUD”) treatment infrastructure; (3) addressing the needs of communities of color and vulnerable populations (including sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations) that are disproportionately impacted by SUD;
(4) diversion of people with SUD from the justice system into treatment, including by providing training and resources to first and early responders (sworn and non-sworn) and implementing best practices for outreach, diversion and deflection, employability, restorative justice, and harm reduction;
(5) interventions to prevent drug addiction in vulnerable youth, including but not limited to, youth in foster care, juvenile justice-impacted youth, youth experiencing adversities related to socioeconomic status, and unhoused youth; and/or (6) the purchase of naloxone for distribution and efforts to expand access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversals.
c) The California Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”) may add to this list (but not delete from it) by designating additional High Impact Abatement Activities. DHCS will make reasonable efforts to consult with stakeholders, including the CA Participating Subdivisions, before adding additional High Impact Abatement Activities to this list. d) For the avoidance of doubt, and subject to the requirements of the Governing Documents and applicable law, CA Participating Subdivisions may form agreements or ventures, or otherwise work in collaboration with, federal, state, local, tribal or private sector entities in pursuing Opioid Remediation activities funded from the CA Abatement Accounts Fund. Further, provided that all CA Abatement Accounts Funds are used for Opioid Remediation consistent with the Governing Documents and this Agreement, a county and Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 5 any cities or towns within the county may agree to reallocate their respective shares of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds among themselves, provided that any direct distribution may only be to a CA Participating Subdivision and any CA Participating Subdivision must agree to their share being reallocated. iii. CA Abatement Accounts Fund Oversight
a) Pursuant to Section 5 below, CA Participating Subdivisions receiving funds pursuant to the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement must prepare and file reports annually regarding the use of those funds. DHCS may regularly review the reports prepared by CA Participating Subdivisions about the use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds for compliance with the Governing Documents and this Agreement. b) If DHCS determines that a CA Participating Subdivision’s use of CA Abatement Accounts Funds is inconsistent with the Governing Documents or this Agreement, whether through review of reports or information from any other sources, DHCS shall send a request to meet and confer with the CA Participating Subdivision. The parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve the concern. c) If the parties are unable to reach a resolution, DHCS may conduct an audit of the Subdivision’s use of the CA Abatement Accounts Funds within one year of the request to meet and confer, unless the parties mutually agree in writing to extend the meet and confer time frame.
d) If the concern still cannot be resolved, the State may bring a motion or action against the Subdivision in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to resolve the concern or otherwise enforce the requirements of the Governing Documents or this Agreement. However, in no case shall any audit be conducted, or motion be brought, as to a specific expenditure of funds, more than five years after the date on which the expenditure of the funds was reported to DHCS, in accordance with this Agreement. e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not limit the statutory or constitutional authority of any state or local agency or official to conduct audits, investigations, or other oversight activities, or to pursue administrative, civil, or criminal enforcement actions.

C. CA Subdivision Fund
i. Fifteen percent of the payments to California subject to this Agreement will be allocated to the CA Subdivision Fund. All funds in the CA Subdivision Fund will be allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. The funds will be used, subject to any limits imposed by the Governing Documents and this Agreement, to fund future Opioid Remediation and reimburse past opioid-related expenses, which may include fees and expenses related to litigation.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 6 However, in no event shall more than one-third (5% out of the 15%) be used for litigation-related fees and expenses.

D. Provision for State Back-Stop Agreement
On August 6, 2021, Judge Dan Polster of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, issued an order (ECF Docket Number 3814) (“MDL Fees Order”) in the National Prescription Opiate Litigation (MDL No. 2804) “cap[ping] all applicable contingent fee agreements at 15%.” Private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions should seek its contingency fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund pursuant to the Governing Documents, and if applicable, the Attorney Fee Fund or Cost Funds under the settlement agreements with other Opioid Defendants.

A Plaintiff Subdivision may separately agree to use up to one-third (5% out of the 15%) of its share of the CA Subdivision Fund to pay for fees or costs incurred by its contingency-fee counsel (“State Back-Stop Agreement”), pursuant to Exhibit R of the GESA and the MDL Fees Order, so long as: (1) such payments, together with any payments to contingency-fee counsel from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund related to such Plaintiff Subdivision, do not exceed 15% of a Plaintiff Subdivision’s total gross recovery under this Agreement; and (2) Plaintiff Subdivision certifies that any payments made under a State Back-Stop Agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section 5.02(a) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(i) of the MSA. Before seeking fees or litigation costs and expenses from a State Back-Stop Agreement, private counsel representing Plaintiff Subdivisions must first seek contingency fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund funded pursuant to the Governing Documents. Further, private counsel may only seek reimbursement for litigation fees and costs that have not previously been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

To effectuate a State Back-Stop Agreement pursuant to this section, an agreement in the form of Appendix 2 may be entered into by a Plaintiff Subdivision, private counsel, and the California Office of the Attorney General. The California Office of the Attorney General shall, upon the request of a Plaintiff Subdivision, execute any agreement executed by a Plaintiff Subdivision and its private counsel if it is in the form of Appendix 2. The California Office of the Attorney General will also consider requests from Plaintiff Subdivisions to execute and enter into agreements presented in other forms.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement does not require a Plaintiff Subdivision to request or enter into a State Back-Stop Agreement, and no State Back-Stop Agreement shall impose any duty or obligation on the State of California or any of its agencies or officers, including without limitation the Attorney General.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 7 5. State and Subdivision Reporting
a) DHCS will prepare an annual written report regarding the State’s use of funds from the settlement until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will be made publicly available on the DHCS web site.
b) Each CA Participating Subdivision that receives payments of funds from the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement will prepare written reports at least annually regarding the use of those funds, until those funds are fully expended and for one year thereafter. These reports will also include a certification that all funds that the CA Participating Subdivision has received through the Purdue Bankruptcy Plan and related Sackler settlement have been used in compliance with the Governing Documents and this Agreement. The report will be in a form reasonably determined by DHCS. Prior to specifying the form of the report DHCS will confer with representatives of the Plaintiff Subdivisions.
c) The State and all CA Participating Subdivisions receiving CA Abatement Accounts Funds will track all deposits and expenditures. Each such subdivision is responsible solely for the CA Abatement Accounts Funds it receives. A county is not responsible for oversight, reporting, or monitoring of CA Abatement Accounts Funds received by a city within that county that receives direct payment. Unless otherwise exempt, Subdivisions’ expenditures and uses of CA Abatement Accounts Funds and other payments will be subject to the normal budgetary and expenditure process of the Subdivision. d) Each Plaintiff Subdivision receiving CA Subdivision Funds will track all deposits and expenditures, as required by the Governing Documents and this Agreement. Among other things, Plaintiff Subdivisions using monies from the CA Subdivision Fund for purposes that do not qualify as Opioid Remediation must identify and include in their annual report, the amount and how such funds were used, including if used to pay attorneys’ fees, investigation costs, or litigation costs. Pursuant to Section 5.02(b) of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(ii) of the MSA, such information must also be reported to the Settlement Administrator and Sackler Parties’ Representative.
e) In each year in which DHCS prepares an annual report DHCS will also host a meeting to discuss the annual report and the Opioid Remediation activities being carried out by the State and Participating Subdivisions.

6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 8 b) Except as provided in the Governing Documents, this California Purdue/Sackler StateSubdivision Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in this Agreement, if any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this Agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Governing Documents, this Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 9 The undersigned, Cypress city, CA, ACKNOWLEDGES acceptance of this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement is a requirement to be an Initial Participating Subdivision and ACCEPTS this Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds - Purdue/Sackler Settlement.

I swear under penalty of perjury that I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this agreement on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature: /signer_1_purdue/
Name: /name_1_purdue/
Title: /title_1_purdue/
Date: /date_1_purdue/
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the Proposed California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Purdue/Sackler Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CA Participating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to onehundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
1 of 15
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%
City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%
City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%
City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%
City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%
City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%
City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%
City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%
City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%
City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%
City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%
City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%
City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%
City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484%
County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%
County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178%
City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%
City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595%
County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644% County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221 %
County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%
City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%
City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%
City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%
City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%
City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%
City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
2 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%
City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%
City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%
City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416%
City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%
City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909%
City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%
City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444%
City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608% County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%
City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456%
County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211 %
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%
City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%
City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534%
City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%
City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387%
City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%
City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%
City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537%
County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%
County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
3 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%
City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%
City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791%
County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%
County Kern County Kem 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145%
City Arvin Kem 0.006% 0.0046425%
City Bakersfield Kem 0.212% 0.1747198%
City California City Kem 0.009% 0.0070820%
City Delano Kem 0.030% 0.0249316%
City McFarland Kem 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kem 0.015% 0.0120938%
City Shafter Kem 0.013% 0.0103417%
City Tehachapi Kem 0.009% 0.0073580%
City Wasco Kem 0.008% 0.0069861%
County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%
City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900%
County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%
City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964%
County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
4 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%
City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520%
City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%
City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301%
City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%
City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132%
City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%
City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682%
City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%
City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%
City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882%
City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%
City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993%
City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%
City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261%
City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%
City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411 %
City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%
City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
5 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%
City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667%
City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%
City La Cafiada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565% City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971%
City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%
City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%
City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%
City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190%
City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%
City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%
City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%
City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%
City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%
City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269%
City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%
City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%
City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455%
City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%
City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677%
City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%
City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%
City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102% City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483%
City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%
City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933%
City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%
City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%
City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
6 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%
City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726%
City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%
City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531%
City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%
City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646%
City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%
City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603%
City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%
City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%
City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%
City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%
City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517%
City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%
City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441%
County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%
City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%
City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824%
City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131% County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
7 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%
City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%
City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%
City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762%
County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%
County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%
County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%
City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%
City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%
City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%
City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%
City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%
City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%
City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870%
County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%
City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783%
County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%
City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843%
County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%
City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%
City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%
City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%
City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%
City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%
City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
8 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%
City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744%
City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%
City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%
City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350%
City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%
City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%
City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%
City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546%
City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%
City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190%
City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%
City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%
City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%
City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%
City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510%
City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%
City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955%
City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%
City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223%
County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%
City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%
City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
9 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%
County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%
City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714%
City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%
City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%
City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%
City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083%
City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%
City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%
City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792%
City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991 %
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%
City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%
City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909%
City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%
City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465%
City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%
City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%
City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279%
City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%
City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500%
County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
10 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%
City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704%
City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%
City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%
City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%
City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388%
City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%
City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522%
City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%
City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%
City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934%
City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431 % City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150%
City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%
City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%
City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%
City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%
City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%
City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
11 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%
City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%
City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204%
City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%
City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428%
City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%
City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169%
City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%
City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401%
City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%
City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144%
Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%
City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%
City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176%
City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%
City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
12 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456% City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%
City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%
City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841 % County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%
City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%
City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%
City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%
City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%
City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%
City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%
City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%
City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%
City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%
City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%
City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%
City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%
City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%
City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943%
County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%
City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%
City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%
City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%
City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179%
County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%
City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%
City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
13 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%
City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%
City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120%
City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%
City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%
City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161%
City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%
City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348%
City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%
City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136%
County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%
City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841 %
City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393% County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795%
City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%
City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%
City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%
City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183%
City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%
City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644%
County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%
City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
14 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%
City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%
City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%
City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531%
City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%
County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949%
City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%
City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%
City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111%
City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%
City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%
City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872%
County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621% County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201%
City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%
City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%
City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B APPENDIX 1
15 of 15
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement
Percentage
Plaintiff
Subdivision
Percentage
Weighted
Allcation
Percentage
City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%
City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145%
City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181% City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%
City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%
City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902%
County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%
City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%
City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904%
County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 1 APPENDIX 2

CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Purdue/Sackler settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State BackStop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Costs) of the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Settlement Agreement (GESA).

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Governing Documents and California Purdue/Sackler State-Subdivision Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the CA Subdivision Fund of the Purdue/Sackler settlement to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL] from [SUBDIVISION’S] CA Subdivision Fund allocation will not exceed [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED ONE-THIRD OR 5% OUT OF THE 15%] out of the [SUBDIVISION’S] 15% CA Subdivision Fund allocation; provided further that such payments, together with any contingency-fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the [SUBDIVISION’S] total gross recovery from the Purdue/Sackler settlement. [SUBDIVISION] further certifies that any payments made under this Backstop Agreement will be made in accordance with the 95% Opioid Abatement use requirements under Section 5.02 A of the GESA and Section 4.01(f)(i) of the Master Settlement Agreement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Local Government Costs and Expenses Fund created under the Governing Documents before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Governmental Entity & Shareholder Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.

Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B 2 [DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Docusign Envelope ID: 061B4E40-7387-4FD6-862D-45EA8FF9659B RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS AUTHORIZING THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE PROPOSED

SETTLEMENT OF OPIOD-RELATED CLAIMS AGAINST PURDUE

PHARMA/SACKLERS, AS WELL AS OTHER AFFILIATES, AGREE TO

THE TERMS OF THE RELATED STATE-SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT,

AND AUTHORIZE ENTRY INTO THE RELATED STATE-SUBDIVISION

AGREEMENT AND OTHER NECESSARY DOCUMENTS WITH THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL
WHEREAS, the United States is facing an ongoing public health crisis of opioid abuse, addiction, overdose, and death, forcing the State of California and California counties and cities to spend billions of dollars each year to address the direct consequences of this crisis; and
WHEREAS, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio is a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) being pursued by numerous public entity plaintiffs against the manufacturers and distributors of various opioids based on the allegation that the defendants’ unlawful conduct caused the opioid epidemic; and WHEREAS a proposed nationwide tentative settlement was reached between the plaintiffs in the Purdue Pharma L.P. et al case. (Purdue/Sacklers) and WHEREAS, Purdue/Sacklers shall be referred in this Resolution as “Settling Defendant”; and
WHEREAS, as part of the settlement with the Settling Defendant, local subdivisions, including certain cities, that are not plaintiffs in the MDL may participate in the settlement in exchange for a release of the Settling Defendant; and WHEREAS, copies of the proposed terms of those proposed nationwide settlement have been set forth in the Settlement Agreement with the Settling Defendant; and
WHEREAS, copies of the Settlement Agreement have been provided to the City Council with this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement provides, among other things, for the payment of a certain sum to settling government entities in California including to the State of California and Participating Subdivisions upon occurrence of certain events as defined in the Settlement Agreement (“California Opioid Funds”); and WHEREAS, California local governments in the MDL have engaged in extensive discussions with the State Attorney General’s Office (“AGO”) as to how the California Opioid Funds will be allocated, which has resulted in the Proposed California StateSubdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds (“Allocation Agreements”) from the settlements with the Settling Defendant; and WHEREAS, copies of the Allocation Agreement for all of the settlement with the Settling Defendant have been provided with this Resolution; and WHEREAS, under the Settlement Agreement, certain local subdivisions that did not file a lawsuit against the Settlement Defendant may qualify to participate in the settlements and obtain funds from the Abatement Account Fund; and WHEREAS, the City is eligible to participate in the Settlement and become a CA Participating Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, a CA Participating Subdivision that is a city will be allocated its Local Allocation share as of the date on which it becomes a Participating Subdivision. The Local Allocation share for a city that is a CA Participating Subdivision will be paid to the county in which the city is located, unless the city elects to take a direct election of the settlement funds, so long as: (a) the county is a CA Participating Subdivision, and (b) the city has not advised the Settlement Fund Administrator that it requests direct payment at least 60 days prior to a Payment Date; and
WHEREAS, it the intent of this Resolution is to authorize the City to enter into the Settlement Agreement with the Settling Defendant by executing the Participation Agreement and to enter into the Allocation Agreement by executing the signature pages to those agreements.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cypress hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute all documents required to settle and release the City’s claims against the Settling Defendant in exchange for the consideration set forth in the Settlement Agreement, Allocation Agreement and all exhibits thereto to be paid through the County of Orange.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all actions heretofore taken by the City Council of the City of Cypress and other appropriate public officers and agents of the City with respect to the matters contemplated under this Resolution are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Cypress at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of _____, 2025.

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK OFTHE CITY OF CYPRESS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS
I, ALISHA FARNELL, City Clerk of the City of Cypress, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the said City Council held on the __ day of __, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 3.

FROM: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Receive an Update on the Strategic Plan Six-Month Objectives

RECOMMENDATION
Receive an update on the Strategic Plan six-month objectives.

DISCUSSION
The Strategic Plan establishes major goals and objectives for the City. It provides the principal guidance for the preparation of the budget and a plan for implementation and accountability. The Strategic Plan is among the City Council's most effective tools to improve services and preserve Cypress' high quality of life.

The City Council updated the Strategic Plan in April 2025, including a review of the existing plan, development of new six-month objectives, and a discussion of the City's strengths and accomplishments during the past six months. The attached matrices report the progress on the six-month objectives as of August 25, 2025.

A special City Council meeting is scheduled for October 1 to update the plan for the next six months.

BUDGET IMPACT
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Six-month Objectives

CITY OF CYPRESS

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 2025 – October 2025
Updated: August 20, 2025 A
THREE-YEAR GOAL: MAINTAIN INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS
DONE
ON

TARGET REVISED

1. June 9, 2025 Public Works
Director
Recommend options for streamlining capital
improvement projects to increase efficiency and contain costs
X

2. FUTURE Public Works
Director
Recommend an agreement for an organizational and
best practices review of the Public Works department
X Proposals received in
RFP process. Review
and contract approval
to be completed in
next 6-month
Strategic Plan period

3. FUTURE Public Works
Director
Provide an update and options to phase/adjust the Myra
Avenue pump station No. 1 project scope
X Options to be
presented to City
Council in next 6-
month Strategic Plan
period

4. Ongoing Public Works
Director &
Finance Director
Pursue outside funding to offset the cost of upgrading
Myra Avenue pump station No. 1

5. FUTURE Public Works
Director
Recommend an agreement to update the Sewer System
Master Plan

CITY OF CYPRESS

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 2025 – October 2025
Updated: August 20, 2025 B

MAINTAIN FINANCIAL STABILITY AND PROMOTE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS
DONE
ON

TARGET REVISED

1. July 14, 2025 Finance Director Recommend an agreement with a new firm to perform the City’s annual financial statement audits
X

2. FUTURE Planning Director Recommend an economic development plan that includes advanced location analytics and commercial
real estate information platforms
X To be completed in
next 6-month
Strategic Plan period

3. Sept. 30, 2025 Finance Director Recruit an over-hire Finance Manager as part of the department’s succession plan
X

CITY OF CYPRESS

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 2025 – October 2025
Updated: August 20, 2025 C
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ENHANCE AND MAINTAIN PUBLIC SAFETY

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS
DONE
ON

TARGET REVISED

1. June 30, 2024 Police Chief &
RCS Director
Launch the S.A.I.L.S. senior citizen crime prevention
and safety program
X

2. June 30, 2025 Police Chief Conduct a team building workshop for Police department managers and supervisors
X

3. August 6, 2025 Police Chief
working with
Anaheim Union
HS District
Establish an ongoing e-bike safety program with
Lexington Junior High School
X

4. By Sept. 30, 2025 Police Chief Provide Emergency Operations Center training to City staff
X

5. On-going Police Chief
working with
Cypress School
District
Explore a campus safety partnership with Cypress
School District

CITY OF CYPRESS

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 2025 – October 2025
Updated: August 20, 2025 D
THREE-YEAR GOAL: ENHANCE RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS
DONE
ON

TARGET REVISED

1. July 10, 2025 Ad hoc subcommittee
working with the City
Manager
Report progress/recommendations on park amenities to
the City Council
X

2. August 25, 2025 Ad hoc subcommittee
working with the City
Manager
Report progress/recommendations regarding Cypress
Community Festival to the City Council
X

3. Sept. 8, 2025 RCS Director Recommend updates to the Non-Profit Grant Program policy
X

4. Sept. 22, 2025 RCS Director working
with RCS
Commission
Recommend a scope of work for a firm to lead public
engagement and develop conceptual design options for
the expansion of Baraldi Sycamore Park
X

5. Sept. 30, 2025 RCS Director Establish Arnold Cypress Park utilization and staffing plan
X

CITY OF CYPRESS

SIX-MONTH STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
April 2025 – October 2025
Updated: August 20, 2025 E
THREE-YEAR GOAL: MAINTAIN HIGH QUALITY AND HIGH VALUE SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY

WHEN WHO WHAT STATUS COMMENTS
DONE
ON

TARGET REVISED

1. May 12, 2025 City Clerk Report 2025 Community Survey findings to the City Council
X

2. July 14, 2025 Public Works
Director
Recommend a scope of work for a third-party review of
the solid waste franchise
X

3. August 25, 2025 City Attorney Recommend updates to the Municipal Code to reflect state smoking restrictions and present options for
additional regulations
X

4. FUTURE Mayor, City
Manager & City
Clerk
Recommend a communication policy to the City Council X

5. July 14, 2025 City Manager & City
Clerk working with
Communications
LAB
Complete internal brand/logo development and present
an update and community engagement plan to the City
Council
X

6. August 29, 2025 Public Works
Director & Finance
Director
Implement an online procurement platform to improve
the bidding process and vendor outreach
X

7. FUTURE Planning Director &
RCS Director
Recommend adjustments to align City/RCS District
boundaries through the Local Agency Formation
Commission
X
CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 4.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Accept the Concrete Rehabilitation (Phase Two), Project 414

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the Concrete Rehabilitation (Phase Two), Project 414, in the amount of $106,179.64 and approve the final payment of $5,308.98 to CT&T Concrete Paving Inc.; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with County Recorder.

DISCUSSION
On April 28, the City Council awarded a construction contract to CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. for the second phase of the annual Concrete Rehabilitation project. The project replaced over 2,100 square feet of concrete sidewalks and 290 linear feet of curb and gutter. The work was completed in June.

Public Works will release the Labor and Materials Bond and the Faithful Performance Bond upon expiration of the required lien period.

BUDGET IMPACT
The original estimated cost of construction and inspection was $140,131.98, and final project costs totaled $125,650.82. Sufficient amounts were included in the FY 2024-25 Capital Projects Fund budget for these capital improvements.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Cost Table

PROJECT COST TABLE
Item Description
Original
Amount
Actual
Expenditures Difference
Construction
Construction 93,546.78$ 93,546.78$ -$
Construction Contingency 14,000.00 12,632.86* 1,367.14
Sub-total Construction 107,546.78$ 106,179.64$ 1,367.14$ Construction Management & Inspection
Inspection 28,385.20$ $ 19,471.18 8,914.02$
Inspection Contingency 4,200.00 - 4,200.00
Sub-total Construction Inspection 32,585.20$ 19,471.18$ 13,114.02$ Total Project 140,131.98$ 125,650.82$ 14,481.16$
Concrete Rehabilitation
Project 414
* Includes change orders for additional concrete quantities.

Note: CM/Inspection expenditures are based on actual hours inspectors are needed on the job site. This figure will vary for each job based on actual project duration, required special inspections/material testing and other factors. Original Contract Amounts are cost estimates/proposals based on the project description, scope of work, and anticipated needs.

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 5.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Accept the Orange Avenue Rehabilitation, Project 315

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the Orange Avenue Rehabilitation, Project 315, in the amount of $649,995.41 and approve the final payment of $32,499.77 to Hardy & Harper, Inc.; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with County Recorder.

DISCUSSION
In August 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Hardy & Harper, Inc. to resurface approximately two lane miles of pavement, replace 1,400 square feet of sidewalk, 430 linear feet of curb and gutter, and replant nine trees along Orange Avenue between Moody Street and Denni Street. The work began in October 2024 and was substantially complete in January, with final completion delayed until July 2025.

Public Works will release the Labor and Materials Bond and the Faithful Performance Bond upon expiration of the required lien period.

BUDGET IMPACT
The original estimated cost of construction and inspection was $765,538.92, and final project costs total $704,442.88, as summarized in the attached table. Sufficient amounts were budgeted in FY 2024-25 with the Measure M2 Fund to pay for the project. The City will be reimbursed up to $200,000 of State funding to pay a portion of construction costs.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Cost Table

PROJECT COST TABLE
Item Description
Original
Amount
Actual
Expenditures Difference
Construction
Construction 617,000.00$ 617,000.00$ - $
Construction Contingency 92,550.00 32,995.41* 59,554.59 Sub-total Construction 709,550.00$ 649,995.41 $ 59,554.59$ Construction Management & Inspection
Inspection 48,688.92$ $ 48,688.92 -$
Inspection Contingency 7,300.00 5,758.55 1,541.45
Sub-total Construction Inspection 55,988.92$ 54,447.47$ 1,541.45$ Total Project 765,538.92$ 704,442.88$ 61,096.04$
Orange Avenue Rehabilitation
Project 315
* Includes change orders for addressing unforseen site conditions and additional work.

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 6.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Accept the Sewer System Improvements, Project 385

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the Sewer System Improvements, Project 385, in the amount of $232,080.08 and approve the final retention payment of $11,604 to Vortex Technologies, LCC; and

2. Authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder.

DISCUSSION
In February 2025, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Vortex Technologies, LLC. This project rehabilitated approximately 694 feet of sewer pipe and four sewer manhole structures along Lincoln Ave. The work was completed in July.

Public Works will release the Labor and Materials Bond and the Faithful Performance Bond upon expiration of the required lien period.

BUDGET IMPACT
The original estimated cost of construction and inspection was $319,371.52, and final project costs totaled $261,450.26, as summarized in the attached table. Sufficient amounts were included in the FY 2024-25 Sewer Fund budget for this capital project.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Cost Table

PROJECT COST TABLE
Item Description
Original
Amount
Actual
Expenditures Difference
Construction
Construction $ 244,460.00 $ 232,080.08 $ 12,379.92
Construction Contingency 36,700.00 - 36,700.00
Sub-total Construction $ 281,160.00 $ 232,080.08 $ 49,079.92 Construction Management & Inspection
Inspection $ 33,211.52 $ 29,370.18 $ 3,841.34
Inspection Contingency 5,000.00 - 5,000.00
Sub-total Construction Inspection $ 38,211.52 $ 29,370.18 $ 8,841.34 Total Project $ 319,371.52 $ 261,450.26 $ 57,921.26
Sewer Improvements
Project 385

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 7.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Reject All Bids for City Hall East Wing HVAC Replacement, Project 379

RECOMMENDATION
Reject all bids for City Hall East Wing HVAC Replacement, Project 379.

DISCUSSION
The FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program includes a $700,000 project to replace the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system in the east wing of City Hall. On July 30, the City received three bids, with Airemasters Air Conditioning submitting the lowest bid of $715,000. A bid protest was submitted by the second-lowest bidder: United Mechanical Contractors. Public Works, in consultation with the City Attorney, determined the protest has merit and the lowest bid is considered nonresponsive. A summary of received bids and an analysis of the bid protest are attached.

All construction bids exceed the project's total budget and the cost difference between the lowest and second-lowest bid is over $100,000. Public Works recommends rejecting all bids and re-advertising the project to allow additional bidders to submit proposals and potentially obtain more competitive pricing. After soliciting new bids, Public Works will bring a recommendation to award a construction contract to the City Council in September and construction is anticipated to begin in November. The east wing of City Hall will remain open during construction and the project will be phased to minimize construction impacts.

BUDGET IMPACT
None. The construction phase of the project will be rebid and a recommendation for an award of contract is expected to be brought to the City Council for consideration in September.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Project Bid Information
Bid Protest Analysis
Project Bids Information
Description of Project:

Remove and replace HVAC system at the east wing of City Hall Notice Inviting Bids Sent to: CIPList.com, City Hall Bulletin Board, Community Center Bulletin Board, Police Department Bulletin
Board, McGraw-Hill Construction, Dodge Construction
Network, AGC Plan Room, Construct Connect
Bid Opening Date: July 30, 2025
No. of Bid Packets Downloaded: 32
Bidders Base Bid

1. Airemasters Air Conditioning, Santa Fe Springs, CA $715,000

2. United Mechanical Contractors, Simi Valley, CA $823,000

3. RAN Enterprises Inc., Huntington Beach, CA $994,000
Bid Protest Analysis
Date of Bid Protest: July 30, 2025
Bid Protest Filed By: United Mechanical Contractors (second low bidder) Reason for Bid Protest: • Did not include a signed copy of Addendum #1 as a part of the bid submittal
• Did not list duct cleaning subcontractor for work
Review by City Attorney: A signed addendum was provided in Airemasters Air Conditioning bid submittal
Airemasters Air Conditioning failed to list a duct
cleaning subcontractor for work that is in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent of the prime
contractor’s total bid. This omission does not qualify as an inadvertent or waivable error.

Recommendation: Protest has merit and consider Airemasters Air Conditioning’s bid as nonresponsive.

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 8.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Approve Plans and Specifications and Award Contract for Accessible Pedestrian Signals, Project 407

RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve Plans and Specifications for Accessible Pedestrian Signals, Project 407; and

2. Award a contract to Yunex LLC for $434,095 and authorize a contingency of $65,000.

DISCUSSION
The Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) for FY 2024-25 and 2025-26 include projects to install accessible pedestrian signals (APS) at signalized intersections citywide in two phases.

The United States Access Board’s Public Right of Way Accessibility Guidelines require any new or altered pedestrian signals include APS. APS provide audible and vibrotactile feedback for the visually impaired and have been previously installed at five locations throughout the City. This project will replace the remaining 284 pedestrian push buttons with APS equipment at signalized intersections citywide. Public Works determined it was in the best interests of the City to consolidate the two phases of the project to reduce costs and take advantage of volume pricing.

On August 7, Public Works received seven bid proposals for the project with Yunex LLC as the low bidder. City staff will inspect the project. A summary of project award information is attached.

BUDGET IMPACT
Estimated construction costs are $499,095 and sufficient budgeted amounts were budgeted in FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 in the Lighting District Fund to pay for the project. The unexpended FY 2024-25 budget allocation will be carried over to FY 2025-26 in September and be available to pay for a portion of the recommended project.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Project Award Information
Location Map
Project Award Information Checklist
Description of Project:

Installation of Accessible Pedestrian Signals
Contract Working Days: 25 working days
Notice Inviting Bids Sent to: CIPList.com, AGC Plan Room, Inc. Construction Bid Source, PWX Press, Blackbridge Research &
Consulting, Community Center Bulletin Board City Hall
Bulletin Board and Police Bulletin Board
Bid Opening Date: August, 7, 2025 at 10:00am
No. of Bid Packets Downloaded: 22
Bidders Base Bid + Alternate A +
Alternate B
1 Yunex Traffic $434,095.00
2 Econolite Systems $440,660.27
3 Bear Electrical $500,680.00
4 California Professional Eng $537,758.00
5 Crosstown Electrical $575,463.00
6 Servitek Electric $667,773.00
7 PMT Genaral Eng. $891,365.00
Apparent Low Bidder: Yunex Traffic, Anaheim, CA – $434,095.00 Qualified to Perform Work: Yes. Staff confirmed bid was responsive.

Contractor’s License: Registration with DIR:

Valid at Time of Award: Yes Contractor: Yes
Valid at Time of Bid: Yes Sub-Contractor: N/A
Experience:

The apparent low bidder has performed this type of work for multiple government agencies in Southern California.

Construction Management/Inspection Firm: N/A
On-Call Contract Date: N/A
Amount of Task Order: N/A

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 9.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Approve Final Tract Map No. 19339 for 5732 Lincoln Avenue

RECOMMENDATION
Approve Final Tract Map No. 19339 and the Subdivision Improvement Agreement.

DISCUSSION
The California Subdivision Map Act governs the subdivision of land, or real property, for the purpose of sale, leasing or financing. Under this law, local government has approval authority over the subdivision process. A tract map is required for condominium purposes.

On October 28, 2024, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map No. 19339 for the development of 20 condominiums. The project, developed by The Olson Company, is located on approximately 1.1 acres at 5732 Lincoln Avenue.

The Final Tract Map substantially conforms with Tentative Tract Map No. 19339.

Additionally, all conditions of approval imposed by the City Council have been bonded for or completed, and approval of a Subdivision Improvement Agreement is recommended. Tract Map filing fees have been paid, and the Tract Map has been checked and found to be technically correct.

BUDGET IMPACT
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement as to form.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Tract Map No. 19339
Agenda Report - Tentative Tract Map 10-28-24
Subdivision Improvement Agreement

OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

COUNTY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT

CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT

CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

BENEFICIARY

SIGNATURE OMISSIONS

BENEFICIARY

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
”

BASIS OF BEARINGS

DATUM STATEMENT BASIS OF BEARINGS

!"# $%&' ()*+*,-./),0+12-3),44*45-6*7/+817 9:;<' =>?@A?@>@B CDEF<;':GG H
I
DJK
L;
H;

&
GL
I:MM
I
NOJ :
M
PQ;RSJ
TU"PV:H -
<%&&<W9:;
%W (X1Y8-Z/01)[8*140-,YY71\*45-,-]14X*8*14,)-^0/-3/7_*82-,-`/48,8*\/-`7,+8-a,Y2-,4X-b*4X*45-,-@> 81c4d1_/-X/\/)1Y_/48-,8-efg@-h*4+1)4-(\/4[/-Y71i/+8-/j/_Y8-b71_-],)*b174*,-k4\*714_/48,) l[,)*8m-(+8-7/n[*7/_/4802-,4X-,YY71\/-,4-(bb17X,o)/-p1[0*45-(57//_/48q 9 CDCC
%W r,+s571[4X `d/-]*8m-]1[4+*)-,YY71\/X-8d/-0,)/-1b-8d*0-Y,7+/)2-cd*+d-*0-,-7/_4,48-1b-8d/-+*8mt0-7/X/\/)1Y_/48 ,5/4+m2-81-`d/-u)014-]1_Y,4m-14-a,7+d-@e2-@>@Bq-`d/-u)014-]1_Y,4m-*0-7/n[/08*45-,-]14X*8*14,) ^0/-3/7_*8-v]^3w,4X-8/48,8*\/-87,+8-_,Y-81-+14087[+8-@>-81c4d1_/02-b*\/-1b-cd*+d-,7/-0/8x,0*X/-b17 )1cx*4+1_/-d1[0/d1)X0q-`d/-],)*b174*,-6/Y,78_/48-1b-p1[0*45-,4X-]1__[4*8m-6/\/)1Y_/48-vp]6w ,YY71\/X-8d/-Y71i/+8-14-y,4[,7m-=A2-@>@Bq-`d/-Y71Y/78m-*0-*4-/0+71c-Y/4X*45-]*8m-]1[4+*) +140*X/7,8*14-1b-8d/-,+8*140-7/+1__/4X/X-*4-8d*0-7/Y178q - 371i/+8-6/0+7*Y8*14-,4X-Z/n[*7/X-6*0+7/8*14,7m-(+8*140 `d/-Y71i/+8-*0-)1+,8/X-c*8d*4-8d/-h*4+1)4-(\/4[/-zY/+*b*+-3),4-vh(z3wq-p*5d-X/40*8m-7/0*X/48*,)-v[Y-81 @>-Xc/))*45-[4*80-Y/7-,+7/w-*0-Y/7_*88/X-0[oi/+8-81-,-]^3q-`d/-Y71i/+8-*4+)[X/0-b*\/-,bb17X,o)/-d1[0*45 [4*80-,4X2-,)8d1[5d-`d/-u)014-]1_Y,4m-X*X-418-7/n[/08-,-X/40*8m-o14[02-z8,8/-),c-7/n[*7/0-8d/-]*8m ]1[4+*)-57,48-X/\/)1Y_/48-+14+/00*140-*4-/j+d,45/-b17-8d/-,bb17X,o)/-[4*80q-`1-/40[7/-,bb17X,o*)*8m2 `d/-u)014-]1_Y,4m-*0-7/n[*7/X-81-/48/7-*481-,4-(bb17X,o)/-p1[0*45-(57//_/48-,4X-8d/-,bb17X,o)/ [4*80-,7/-0[oi/+8-81-,-eexm/,7-X//X-7/087*+8*14q - `d/-7/+1__/4X/X-Y71i/+8-+140*080-1b-8c1-=>x[4*8-81c4d1_/-o[*)X*450-14-=q=x,+7/02-b/,8[7*45-8d7//x 0817m-d1_/0-c*8d-8c1-81-8d7//-o/X711_0-7,45*45-b71_-=2@{g-81-=2f={-0n[,7/-b//8q-`d/-Y71i/+8 *4+)[X/0-8c1-1Y/4-0Y,+/-,7/,02-/,+d-c*8d-0d,X/X-0/,8*45-,4X-,-rrl-,4X-,-Y/8-7/)*/b-,7/,-*4-8d/ 01[8d/74-1Y/4-0Y,+/-,7/,q - (-8/48,8*\/-87,+8-_,Y-*0-7/n[*7/X-81-0[oX*\*X/-8d/-Y71Y/78m-81-b,+*)*8,8/-8d/-0,)/-1b-8d/-[4*80q z[oi/+8-371Y/78m-,4X-z[771[4X*45-h,4X-^0/0 `d/-0*8/-*0-\,+,482-,4X-8d/-]*8m-d,0-)/,0/X-*8-b17-b,7_*45-0*4+/-,+n[*7*45-*8-*4-@>>fq-`d/-Y71i/+8-*0 f?@g?@e2-|}=f-(a 37*48-(5/4X,-~8/_
d88Y0}??X/08*4md108/Xq+1_?Y7*48,5_/_1q+b_0/n@B|{7/\4[_>_1X/kj8/74,)7/)1,X/X87[/*X@|ffg =?B

! %

&""

! #
'

(

)

(

+

)

-./...0"0 12/...0"0 ,

#

-3."
-.."
-
,4

5.
-205
,4

7."
7809"
5 ,

:

; -."
3809"
,

; 3"
%
79"
#
--"
,

; 3"

7.09"
:

.03- .02-5
<=>?@ABC>DEDFEDGEHIJDAK>L=>MEDF@NNJED>H@OPJH@Q RSTUVWXYZVYZ[V\U]S^ZV_U`SUa b

c
)

"
*

*

(

"
/

(

;
c

51
"
*

(*0c

19
;

/-9

+

0%

*

*

;
0c

(

;

0
c
""

(

)

-73

;

-.(
;

)

3.;

(

"

0

&
c
)

*

/"

bbd

"
0

(

/
"

;/)

*
;*
;

0
\efRghiVjkflR
95753/m-9 ,

oo

0
"
p+q51m8$
(o
q.$
q%4

$

q

$
q5m997 51

! "
#$
%
$
&'&(
) *
#$
'
+!"'
,!" &
-$
./0
1

2 3$2$4 5

6$2 3$2$$

2$
! "

$ *

7
&

8
2/$
$

$

7
/

9:;9<9=>:?9@<A9?B<C

2

D
2

AE;F=F9:;AG?H=9I?9I:?J:;:@<K?CK<;

$L . $
!
MNOPQRSTUVVWXTYWZT[\V]^OY_[^V`T^aY^VVT^aTbcd^ea_]cbT_Zc_dT]WTd_]^dY`TZce^Wa_VTfW\d^aeTaccbdQ ghNOiSTjakW\Z_ecT]fcTlZWm^d^WaTWYT_TX^bcTZ_aecTWYTfW\d^aeTn`TVWk_]^WaoT]`lcTWYT\a^]oT_abTlZ^kcT]W [cc]T]fcTcp^d]^aeT_abTY\]\ZcTaccbdTWYTq`lZcddTZcd^bca]dQTjd]_nV^dfT_Tn_V_akcbT_llZW_kfT]WT[cc]^ae fW\d^aeTaccbdTWYTnW]fTZca]cZT_abTWXacZTfW\dcfWVbdQ

7
$
$

2

r

/$

/

:;>=@E;B:;9<K?@:>=:H

$ %

s t 2st2

7

L . 7$$
1

$

CuvK=A?I:<@=;J?w?CuvK=A?Eu9@:<AI?C@EA:FF .
$

+''

2

$

$
$

- &!''

*,

$

<K9:@;<9=>:?<A9=E;F #

/$

)*&*+
x!")2D .2$#

!

y$y
z{*8x(|y{'|{s% | {|{*x))& &8

#$%&'()*+,-.( /

1'&-1)2'3*'4 /

6

7889:;<=>?@AB

C

D
-EEFGHIJKEL
MB N
/

/ D N
B

/ O P
D B

B Q
OR

S
"
T US D B
V

WW
X
Y
ZU[\
WY]\
YOR
\

Y
\Y
USS" ZZ

!"#$%&
'()(*+),

-%

&
$
'./,,/ %012,(!345674
894:9

#
;
$$%
-
! .'<949=>7
64?3@364A BCBCD

E
F
G
H
HE
I
E
J
E
E KKE
HH
F

HEK

LF

F

KF

HCNF
G
H
HE
I
F

BOH

EE
F

EKKE
F

CP

EI

E
H
HF

H
ECQRSTUUVUWX BCYCNF

HF

E
K
ELE
K LEF
EF

LF
E
H F

KL K
LKKH
LE

K E

H
LHLH

E F

H F

KL K
LKKH

LHZL
E
L
E
L

KF
L
H F

KLE

H L

MEL

ME LH
EH

EM F

KF
L HH
F
G
HLIFHFHMFIFF

E
E
E [

E
\
H]]^__C`aEM
Hb
H
E
L

B`LcC^de YBfff

gCJH
EMM I K
eYBBOYEYBB]ahCNF
F

K F

HK H
LHLH

EMFIFF

ECQiVjklmjjnoUpkX BC`CNF

EKF

E
E_qB`qYfY^LF

EH

E
E_q]qYfY^L EF

E
ErqBOqYfY^dsF

thK

IFF

CNF
G
HF

HKF

L
uH
F
I

HK
EF

HEL

EKHF

EM F

HCv EKH M

EK
HF
H

F

u
K
w
KH
KF
E
L

H
KH
I

Cd
h BC^CNF

HxHHF

E
F
IF
KH
KyH
KL

E
HH
F

M
H

H IFHM
E

FzOffLfff
HFHH
H
H
HIFF
IZ
K
EC
KH
F

H
E
F
LH
LKKH
L
M
KMEH E

EE
{
Ey
EIF

H

H
LHLE
L
M

E
u

LH
E
|K

LKH
HIFF
IZM

K
EE
F
E

u
H
EM F
{
Ey
EE L H
E HK

L
LMHHLF

C \HFH
KH
F

`fJE HH

H
F
K
CQiVjk mjjnoUpkX

!
!"#
$%% &
'

(
)*

*
'

'
$+!"
"
),

)

) -./0112134 $56(

)#(
"

78
&

(
)9(
):8
9;7
)<(

&

=)*

)

",

""

""(
")
&(
-./0112134 $>""

?""

,

""(
")
(?"(

&-./0112134 $@
)(
"

)"

(

)

""
&"

&
(

"

&

B

""

",
)AC

&8

"-./0112134 $%!"
)6(

,

?"
!

&*"
7
)
&
78
&

(
) 9(
)7

D

"
7

6(
"

"(
("

,
& 9

("

&*"
)

(
$
E

")"

6(
-./0112134 $$

)

"
"

":;&

(&
""B

D

"

"D)
"

)
""

()"

,)
,
7"

&

-./0112134 FGHIJKKLKM $
(
&

"
(
"

N
,7)

(
""

(
)*

*
-./0112134
)

()

,6(

(-./0112134 !

"
"

"7
"

&*"

O-./0112134
!"

()

B
)
)

(
"
(

(
"

(
"

(

,"
&

("7)7
,7
)
?(
(

"
)-./0112134 +!

,
A
"

P;

)

"!

P(?"

)

&*"

"

-./0112134

!
!"#
$%% &
'

(
)*

*
'

'
+"
)

,"

&"

(

(

)-

"

.

/0"

(
(

"")

,

/

"
)

)
!

, &

)

/

"

"

"

0
"(

&0
/)01
&0

"
& -
"(

&("1/)

&2
"

(
3"

"

(
3"
).45678898:; <"
)

(

3"(
-"

"(
)/

,.

)
/

45678898:; =!"

(

("

"(

"
&(&&0")"0

&
".!

,
"

(

"(

"
&
"

"

&&
/

0"

&

)
"1
("

&

("
"

"

(&
)?

""

"
45678898:; %!

,

3"
"(
"

@(
&&&1
& "

1
&
/
" 45678898:; $
!

,

3"
"(
"

@(
&@(

&( 1
&"(
&

&&

"(

(
A(1
&"

(

&
1
&

&

)"0@(
0

)45678898:; $$!

,

3"
"(
"

&1
&
"

&

3"45678898:; $!

,

3"
"(
"

"
(0
"(

&("
&

" 45678898:; $!

,

3"
"(
"

"
&
"

"

/

"

(

0

) *

B
(
&

(
)*

B
(
&&
0

C)!

,?("("

(

&(
=
D

"

)*

B
(
&

(
)*

45678898:; $
!

,

3"
"(

((""

3"

0
"(

&

45678898:; $C!

,

3"
"(

@(
&

/

""()(
)

"45678898:;

!
!"#
$%% &

(
)*

*
'

'
$+!
,"
"(
(
"

(""

-

"

(

"
&"

.((

/

+1%$1
+1%$2

(

3"
2.

45678898:; $<!

(
&&
-
)((

0"

$
%

)=

&3

"!&
"

&

)

(
"

)""

""(
")45678898:; $2!

(

)

(&
(
,"!

(
"

("
-)

>()

(.
.

?(
45678898:; $%(,"
"

&.
"(

&

.
-)."."

A(

," BC#

(
!

.

"
."
"

45678898:;
"
)

"(

(

)45678898:; $-
-?

(
"
""

""(
")."
-
,"

D(

&

&

&*

(""

45678898:; EFGHIJKLMILNHOP $""(

)

(
) *

*

(
"
(

&45678898:; ""(
"

("
(

& (
!

"

"@
"(

&(""
"

.-"-"

"

"A(

)
-

"()

&("(45678898:;

&
&"
)-0"

$$
+
@
&
&A
=

& 3

"!

(&
&

-
&

"

-
&&

,"

) ?
&

("(&(&"(

)
&
&

-
-

)

)
,"

)

-)
"(&"

Q(

)

"
1

45678898:;
3

&
&
&

")-

("&
"45678898:; 1

(

>(
.("
&

&(
.
>() "

("-.(,"

&*"
45678898:; +!&
(

(

"

&>(
.

.

!
!"#
$%% &'
(

)
*+

+
(

(

,)*"

)"-.)/"

*

&+"

"""

&0123445467 8+

"

)

&

-

)

"")*"

")

&
"

"

"

&+"

9
)

)
)
&)-
)

)
)

-

)"

"

"

""0123445467 :+)
&"

.

,)
)

"

""

*

)

;

"

"

)&
*<

""

"
0123445467 %!

"

)"
-

*
"=-

*
."-

"=!
--&
)

&
/"
&
!
&

-"

-
&

")
""

"- )""

!

)-

-

&+"

&
0123445467 $
!

"

)"
-

*
"=&

-

&

/"!&

-
)

"

$

" "=!&
&

-&

9
"+"
&

-)

"

"
-
)")!

)&

-

-

&+"

&
0123445467 $$>

"
)
*
,)

.

*
"
),)

"

)"-!

*-"

?"
-
/".

@A#,)
!
"

)/"

*

& +"

&
0123445467 BCDEFGHFI
$!

)

-
&
&

)
&

-*

&&
&

-")/"
-

&+"
!

"

*

)/"
*
*&
-"

-
&*

)
* +

+
0123445467
!

)
*&
" )

&

-
"

"
!

& &
"

"-
"

)

&J

&K
!

&
)

;)

&

L*+

)

))

,)

*
*

&N

"!

=
)

))

!
!"#
$%% &'
(

)
*+

+
(

(
&
")""""

),
",

"" -)
)
)

&
)

"
.
&
/012334356 789:;<=>:?@;A B$

)
"&

)

*

'

*

)
"
""

"")
"*C

.)"D
E
&)
&

"

.
E

*
""
"

"
&

*

/012334356 B

"
&"
*.
*F."
"*

". ."
-)

*G

*F+
)&H

#
&

&

*

"
** /012334356 BI

E

&

.
E
&

"

"
/012334356 B

."
,-)

)$B
&

*

*

&+"
/012334356 BB
.

"
,
)
.

"*
"
J,

&
*
.

.

K

"

L

&
/012334356 B'M
)

-)
..&

""
) /012334356 BN-)

L",
")

&)"),
&,

"
&,"

"")
"*)

&+"

. +

")*

")
&

*
*

*

)"

)"

/012334356 O8P?QR:S@T;:U '$!)
"
"
"
"
."

&

"

*"

)"

""

".
*G

/012334356 '

&""*

/012334356 '!E
&
)

*
")E
&/012334356 V8WRT?QRSXYZ:@;SQ;:;>Q N$., ",

"
)

&
"
)"""E,
*
,.
&,
&

"E,."
)")[)")
&*
&."

"/012334356

!
!"#
$%% &'
(

)
*+

+
(

(
',
&
)"

-,-*

"

)"
*"

"..

&
-,
&)"

.)",

"",
)".

/012334356 '!
*

""))

*

&

-
/012334356 '

)

&

)")

&

,
.
&
&
"
*"",
)"

/012334356 '7!
*

&&

-

8
)

-
&*
*/012334356 '9!:;<)

*&
"")
*

! -"
&=
"

)-)

"
)&&>/?3543@@A435B 012334356 CDEFFG 8$!" *

-
&H
)

9$8.

- /?3543@@A4356
,

I

)
"
J)

&K
+
&L
#+
&
I

)
"
J)

&K

*
-
!"M

I

)
"
J)

&K
H&

!"M

I

)
"
J)

&K
L
N)

#
",I

)
#K
N
*N-

I

)
"
J)

&KO OPP---
"
&
P
P
-)

")
P
'
7P987%%$8$$%

Q

&P;

N)")K

",I

)
Q

&
K
Q

&

M
"

I

)
"K
J)

&

",I

)

K
J)

&

M
"

I

)
"K
)"M

",I

)

K
)"M

M
"

I

)
"K 8R

8
)

S"."
P

)
*+

+
"",*
TUVWXYZT[F\]^_F`U\aF\ZbW XcFZdeUVWXZUfZghiDii

)
*

.

*

"

))

L

j'$$

H&)

. !$
."

'77M.-
)"
8
)

."
P

)
*+

+
"",<)

.

S"&

/012334356 kDlWmbWFF\bWm %$!
&

&<)

*

*.
")

&

)"")

&).

!
!"#
$%% &'
(

)
*+

+
(

(

,-.&

&

&".

)

,
-"

,/)
*
*
&

""

", ""

0"

*
&
.*

*
*
&
1

.")*

.""

.
"
. "

&)
.
".

)

"
*

*

*.

,
*
&)
"
*"

2
")*

,
*

)
"
)

&

.,"
"").
&)

)

&

&
"

""

",

"

&
4

5"

6 )"

"

&
*
"),
-,
)"&

,*.
* &.

.
)
,
-

))"

6 )"

"

"

,
-
"

789:;9<<=;9:> %!"

&

*

*
*)?"
/)

"

"

*

*.)
)"
*
)

"

*

&

&
*

.)

)
"
*

*
&

,

789:;9<<=;9:>@
2)

A %

*"

)

?" ,""

)

.
&,*.

)*"

.

"

)

/)
*2"

'BB$
C)

&

*
&
789:;9<<=;9:> %
!"
-).
")

&
&

&.)

&.&

&., /)*.

/)
)&

5

""-

D66"*",

"
)
"

*
*
&
789:;9<<=;9:> EFGHIJKLMINOJPQROSTOJQSTUQVWXYOMQZOPTS[\][^I_ $ $!"

)""

"
&

)"&

,*
"

&

*
*

789:;9<<=;9:` ab;9c<9b9d<> EEGeURUfQIJKQ^ILSURISUf $$$!
"

)"
,,,"

)
"

*
*
&
789:;9<<=;9:> $$

"

)

."
),
&

*&
"
&
.

&

)"

6 ,

&/)

*+&
2

2,g"

*
*
&
@89:;9<<=;9:A $$,
@
")

&

A,

,

"

*

.
)""

!
*

*

*

"
,
789:;9<<=;9:>

!
!"#
$%% &%
'

(
)*

*
'

'
+,-./011/230114 $$5

6
("&
6)7)

""

"6

"
(8"

)
&
9:;<=;>>?=;<@ $!"

(""

("&

6))

6
&

)A
&
")

()
"
)
)
&

)

9BC=;D>;C;E>@ +F-./011/2GHIJ/HKI $$!"
("

"
&
&&

&
)

L
"

(

(&

&

&)"
L*(M&
7

)
)
&

)

)
&

+N-./011/4 $
$

(
"

)""

""(
")7
"(

&
)7"
("L
"

(O &

"
P

&
)

("

""

"6
)("Q
R

)
&
$

(
"

)""

""(
")7
"(

&
)7"

6
6)
""

6"
*"

&
)

L
"

(!

"
)6

6
&S(
&

&

T U

("

""

"6
)("Q
R

)
&

U

"

)

"
7

"
(

6
)
&

6
R U
8(()(

&

""

"6"

&()A S(

U V
"
)(
")"(
&

"( U 5
")7&

)

(

)
6R

6)
"

"6*S(

(
"

"

W9:;<=;>>?=;<@ $
V

"
)
&
7
7
6R7"(

&(7

)
("

(
6
R
"
6
8"

)"

"

)
&
$

!"
(
&

)
)
&

)

)6
R6

&("&
6)M
&

!
!"#
$%% &$

(
)*

*
'

"&

)+

,-./01/2231/04 $
5

(
"
""

""(
")6"

"
)
&("

7"
&
&6
&

(
"

6

7
7"(

6
"

)
&
-./01/2231/04 89:;<=>?@?A?BCA $5$!&
(D"

)E

!
)((

&

)(""

6 (

7

)

&*"

("F
G*"

H
((

+(

#"I

""()
&
)("(

&
)(

)6"
"
)7"

J./01/2231/0K,LMN//1/0O 8P:QRSTT?U $V$!"" 7)

&

("
"

"E(

&

7)6

)
)
&
-./01/2231/04 $V!W(
)6
"

67
6

)
("
7)(D"

)!"
&

"

)
7)
" (

("&

7)6"

("7
G -./01/2231/04J*7)O $V

(
"

)&

&6"

W(&

"
&

&+

5
"

6
7)6

G7)6

&

)!"
&
! "
G
")

&

" W(
("

&6&
6(6

"6
"6

)

"
"

(

&

)
&
-./01/2231/04J+&*
"O 8X:YZ?[?Z?\A $]$

(
"
""

""(
")6"

7

&()"(

&
(

-./01/2231/04

!
!"#
$%% &$$
'

(
)*

*
'

'
+,-./012034 $5$

(
"
&

&
"

(

67" "
6
"

)
&
6"
(&

&

&

)&

"
&

(
&"( &

8
&

(
)9()
:;
"<=>?@A?BBCA?@D !"

(

7
&E(
F
*
&

"

)
&

;(

&8"
!G

&
"

7HI()#
&

69

)J

("

9(

)G

&

"))
)
&

!

&)
(
(

&

&

&
7

!
(

"6
<
& $LK6

"K
("(

(("

&
"

""

& ")6

)
)
&

*
&"
"&
&

M"

)
&

7"(

"(
)

("

)6"
)

&""
"

"&
6(
"

6

7

M"

)

&"("

(
)
8
&G

&8

" (

)
&

&*

N
"*
&#
( +O-PQR/STU0Q4/TVW0X1QYTZT[0Q1R20XT\RXXWQ02QT.1]^_0/34T`X1S120Q1R2TPY]Q4S $%$*
((

<

""

"7"

E(

9

a&

(
*"&

9)b*9c 8

a5

)8

a5

$

d $%

(
"

)&

&
(

&6"
(
7

)
)
&
6e
HI()#
&

bHI#c!HI#(
"(

&
""

(""

6
(

6
&
6

7"

7("(
"

&
)"
9
&

"

&(
(

( (

7
(6

)

!HI#(

)
(
("(

("(("

"(
*
& #
&

b*#c

(f8
&

(
)!"
"G(

" *
"(
b8
!G*c7#

HI#

!
!"#
$%% &$
'

(
)*

*
'

'
"+,#
-"(
. / 0
)1"(
+,#2 / 0
)1

+,#"

)
(2 /

*&
3#4"5("
0
&
(6 0
&)6
0
&"

"

(6"
&
("

0

"&6

&
(2 / 7
"

8
(
9
("

3#

*#2 / 7
"(

"

3#45

*#2 / 7
"(

#

"4: #5
4$5
"

";(

"

3#45245

)<

"

"
!

3#45245
""

(

"

" !

3#4524
5
"(
+,() 7

&
$%

(
"

&

&
(

&6"
(( "
"
)

=
+,()#
&

4+,#5

& <

>

&

(

&

93

&
&4
5
""

)
&
!=
+,#9(

(;(

)+,() #
&

&(

=
+,()#
&

9
(

""(

(

;(

")

&

)(

"(
("*#

:
!>*

);(
"
)
)
&

+,#
) &
"

(
=
+,#);(

(
"

)6+,#(

)

)

(

&
("

&
"

3#;(

(
(

<

)"

(""

""

"

" $%
!
<

&+,()7

#

"

(
(

"
<;()3#6"

)
)

"

"6;(
)9

8&

(
*"&

9)4*95:

8?

):

8?

$

@!&
<(-"
<

)
&

)

)3

""
"

-"

6
<

A
&

(")

"< "

""

"<

(
"
""

""(
")6"
(

"

"<
)B

!
!"#
$%% &$
'

(
)*

*
'

'
*+,

)
&

-.()#
&/
"(

&0 1 *

("(2#
&
""32#4
"

2#

5"6

-.#

#

"

&

/"

1 *

"
"

7

("(2#
"

5"6-.# 1 *

"

5"6

-.#

&
37"
8 #
4
"

""(
1 &
)"

"

)

)9(

"

)

"

"
"

)

") 1 +("
"

7
&7
5"
&
:

"

7
7 :
"

)
) 1 &
)

"

3"
&

4

)

$

(
"
""

""(
")

5"
) "

"7

-.#/#

"

8 #
1 *

"
;
8;**

7
&0 $!

;63(
"(

-.#/#

"

8 #
4

5"6<

7 :
"

= -.(),

&

-.#

8 #
"
=
!

-.()#
&

3-.#4

#

"38 #4
>?@AB@CCDB@AEFGHICDFJKHLBIMNF3*+O-.#

"#(4 $%P

/7
7)"

("

&/(

*(
&*

8"

""(
")
""

"7") 9(
$%Q
(

&("/
"(

&

/("

7(

"

)

""(
") $%R!
"
(

O
")"
&34(
"(
("(
"

"
( 7

&

7

"
77)

&
"
( O7(S
S

34(
7

)

!
"
(

O
")"
&34)

)

"
((

(
&
)"
(

)/(

&

"
(

&(T

(

)/
"
()9(

!
!"#
$%% &$

(
)*

*
'

'
"(

+,(
$%-+"
"

)

.+"

&

+

(
"/(+.(

"

)
""
"

(0&(("
"

()
"/(&("

("
)
)
+

+
1
(

+
1
"

$%%*"

(

(
&

+

)!
"&

+

(

(

+

) $%$

(
"

)&

&
(

&."
((

32
4

&

)
&

5(

&6"

""

"+,(

2

0&

(
*"&

2)3*24 6

0-

)6

0-

$

7!2
(

"

"+
)1*2 8

2+,()&(

&

&

"!2
(

)
+"

.+. &

&

"/

.&&&.

." (
)"

.

.

"(

"

& +)
"
+)+

.
."/
&.

!2
(

"
+"
+
(5#+

(
&"

)((("&

+)!2
((

"
&
&""(
"

9""
)
"(
2
(/
9"

,( $%$$

(
"
""

""(
")."
("

).""
..

.

."

). (

)
&
."
("

)("

).""
..
.

)
&

"
)"
:"

(

.
))/
&

"
)

1
$%$!
+

$%$
)(

;
$%$

"(

&

"

&
""35#4 ("

+")<

"
)
6"
$3 &

&

)

"
#)3

)

"

&),(
)
)
&
$%$=!(

(+
&
/
&.

+
&.
(

&.(

)
"
"

)
/+

&

!
!"#
$%% &$'
(

)
*+

+
(

(

$%$,-

"
&)
*

."
&

)")

/

)"

0)
0

"
"
"

)
)
)

)

$%$1
*
"

)""

"

*. 2)*
"

*
*

*3

* 3

&
"*435
*

)) $%$6!7

8

)
"

"

.
"

9:#!"
.

9:#
.

7

8

"

"
". )
"

"

"
&

&
)");""

&
$%$%!"
.)<"
2)

3"

$
%

* #)
"

&

&
.
)

")

&/)

/
=

#

">"

?9:#

)&
*;

&*/

)
"

""

"")
"* $%

45@
*

&

&

&

9:#.
)
.

*
&
$%$

)")
")

3.
!

1/
$'
&

"
.

<")

*/

"

8#)
"3"

)
") A
"
""

&
*

&

")
)
"" "
4A35
"

)")
"

3.
!

BCDEFGHIGJKLMJILNMOPQR
$"
S

&

"

"

&
"

"!

"

"*

&

!"
S

.

"
)!

"
)
"

.8)

&

*
")

&)

/
)/)
"/
"

*
2)

2)4TUVWXVYZ[\YX[]\^_`a5
!"
."
)
"

&.
8)

&="

*
&
4

&
5

*.
@
&

<"!
& @"

.
.@

"

"
/
")

&)

/
&
S
&
.2)

)

.
"
*+"

)"9
@4TUVWXVYZ[\YX[]\^_`ab[cYZVY__dVYZ5

!
!"#
$%% &$'
(

)
*+

+
(

(

"*"

"*"&

* "

-)"

)
)" &

.*)

*
&
/01234256789:;<=>?

&

&@AB
"

C)

&

&)
"C)
&

&
.D#

"
*D)

&+

&

&/012342567879:;<=>?
E+*F

&

)

&
"

"")

.
)"G&
A*)

*
&
/012342567:5479:;<=>?
'"
H

C)

"
*."

G

FD)

&F)
&F""F

#"
"

F

I
D)

&@

F!
F

*

*

/012342567879:;<=>?
JI

&F

)

&"

"

)
.
JK

*
)&M
*F.
%K

@)
*F
*B

"

N

)

& "

).
JK

*
)&@)
*F

*
*B

"

OP QRSTUVWXYZ[V\][\]Q]W^]_[\]`V\_WX`[XRWZ][P\RS[`\V_WX`[R\[_]SRUWYWRXa[Pb\Yc]\ \]ZY\WQYWRXZ[SVd[e][WSTRZ]_[RX[Yc][ZYV\Y[YWS][RP[QRXZY\bQYWRX[ed[Yc][fW\]QYR\[RP gRSSbXWYd[f]^]URTS]XYa[bT[YR[V[hijj[VkSk[ZYV\Y[YWS]k "

"*
.

*

*N

C)
C)
.")
&
"

".))l"

"

*
*/012342567879:;<=>?
L
)
"
m*F

*n
&

)
*M)
*F* C)
/012342567879:;<=>?
%!*E"
)

)

&
/012342567879:;<=>?
$

&
,
")

&#
$
"")
"-"
)
$
"m
)/012342567879:;<=>?
$$

&

)
.

""m!

")

&""*F")
*F
"

".@" op
#
&"
@

F&

&F
&F)F

)

&

&""/012342567879:;<=>?
$
"
)"
)
.

""m!
C)

D)

&

!

@

/012342567879:;<=>?
$

""

"")
"*FC)
*

@o

$%LE
F"

"

+
+M

*

*D)

&+

""
*

)

&
/012342567879:;<=>?

!
!"#
$%% &$'
(

)
*+

+
(

(

$
,)

&

*"

&
-./012034565789:;<= >?@ABCDEFGH $$!

"
&

&
&

I"
)I"
J*
*
"+
-KL10M:5N:O8P;Q:3;= $R)

&

"&&

*

"

*
"

-KL10M:5N:O8P;Q:3;T= $!

UV"

&W
&
"

&

&)W
&W" -KL10M:5N:O8P;Q:3;= $ X")*&
&

W
&Y)"

"Y

J*S

))

J& )-KL10M:5N:O8P;Q:3;= >>@ZFEB $+& UJ[

I"

)I"
"

"\)

"

)

]
&

)
*S)
*^]
S_!

J

*)\)

)-`abc=
X)X\)
"[!"

*)
^_

J
]
&

)
*S)
*
J

"

"

]
S"
"

)
"
"&

&
)

& Y&

&

\)
Y"

*)[ d S#
^""

U$
e_ d
#

#^# #_\)^U%$
_Y

)

)

"
"
"
JS#
J

)
"
)

&Y"

*)[ d "")^""

U'Y
J_ d

&
)

&
*

W*^""

U
'

U
'e_ d S
W*^""

U
fe_ e

"

"
&

"

*)[ d S*^""

Ue
_ d S
W*^""

U
ee_ fX"")\)
**

")
I""

)
&
&

YJY"

Y
"

Y

"")
"*X

Y&)

Y

)
Y)
)"

J
*]
S*
)

!
!"#
$%% &$'
(

)
*+

+
(

(
*
&
"
&

+

,"

& -!
*./
0"")
"*1
"

2

)
"

*

""

"")
"*30
/
"

"

"

0
/
"

)
"

"4"

"

5"

"

)4*

"")
"*6
*

78)
1
"

"
)

*

"*"
&0
/1
"

,"
)
&-$

9-
:$9
'&
"*""
21
""
"""

&
"* "")

*"

"

")
*4

34

8)
3

%;)

1
"

8)
""

4*

*

3 "
""
"
0
/

&
&"
))

&

0
/1
"

,"
)
&-$

9-
:$9
4," <8)
)

*

"
"
) )

"

=>?@ABCDEFGHI $!"
)"

4"

*J

4) 4

4K"
3"*"
&3

&
""*"
& !
*

4

4,
)"

&
""*"
&8)
)

4
&
)" L
K+"
6MNOPQRSTUVWXYSTZ[\VS]NZPQ[^7 /

"

3)

&
"")
3"

)
8)

"
"

4)"K

"

"

)
&"

""4*

"K
4
)4

_)

&0"6MNOPQRSTUVWX7 !"

"
"
4
)
&"
4

*J

4)`MNOPQRSTUVWXa
/

)

"3"
)

4*3

)

)

4
8)"3"
"3

& ""*

4)"K

)

)

)

*
*J

4)

*
&
7,

4)"K

"K
&
)

"*

4*`MNOPQRSTUVWXa "2 0"
'3

,
!10, b

!
!"#
$%% &$%
'

(
)*

*
'

""( +,&
& -.

"
& /0

1
)#

" %2 $

&

& $$.

"
&
("3&

4) $,5

45 $,! $
,.&
& $+, $-,(

$/!" $1 $%*
&
,
46() $7(

& ,) ,"() 2
,

4
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 A0.00 TITLE SHEET OWNER/APPLICANT: THE OLSON CO BRIAN CUNNINGHAM 3010 OLD RANCH PARKWAY, SUITE 100 SEAL BEACH , Ca 90740 562-370-2290 [email protected] ARCHITECT: THE KTGY GROUP, INC. 17911 VON KARMAN AVE., SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 949-851-2133 [email protected] CIVIL: ADVANCED CIVIL GROUP 30251 GOLDEN LANTERN, SUITE E, PMB 251 LAGUNA NIGUEL, CA 92677 866-338-5778 [email protected] LANDSCAPE STUDIO PAD, INC 23195 LA CADENA DR., SUITE 103 LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653 949-770-8530 [email protected] CYPRESS-LINCOLN & LOS ALTOS CYPRESS, CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 A1.2 PERSPECTIVE SKETCH VIEWVIEW 1 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 A1.3 PERSPECTIVE SKETCH VIEWVIEW 2 215.9998 T R S S D D DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE DW DW DW DW DW SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SD SD SD SD SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SD S S SD SD SD 11' 24' 4' Neighborhood Entry EASEMENT LINCOLN AVE 11' 12'

F I R E L A N E F I R E L A N E

56.7' 40.9'

30.8' 36.9' 37.0' 1234567
442.36'
125.20'
517.38' 100' Access Walking Space ±3580sf Open Space ±3068sf Guest Parking 15' Storm Drain Easement Guest Parking Fire Hammerhead with Turf Block 54.0'TRG R T G W/H

W/H W/H R T G W/H R T G RT
W/H G

W/H R T G W/H R T G RT

W/H GRTW/H GRTW/H G TRG R T G
W/H

W/H W/H R T G W/H R T G RT
W/H G

W/H R T G W/H R T G RT
W/H GRTW/H GRTW/H G 20' 50'
50'
21' Fire Hammerhead 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SITE DATA APN: 244-472-09 Address: 5732 Lincoln Avenue City: Cypress, CA County: Orange County Existing Zoning: Lincoln Avenue Specific Plan - Commercial Mixed Use Site Area: ±1.1 ac (±47,987sf Gross) Construction Type: V-B Occupancy Type: R2 Fire Department: OCFA Fire Sprinkler Type: NFPA 13 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Min. Lot Size: 10,000 sqft Min. Lot Frontage: 150 ft Max. Building Height: 30 ft Max. Dwelling Units per acre: 30 D.U Min. Dwelling Units per acre: 20 D.U Min. Shared Open Space: Linear dimension of 50 ft Required Setbacks Frontage:10' Interior Side:5' Rear:5' Min. Distance Between Buildings on Same Parcel: 10' FAR: 0.64 State Density Bonus Parking: 2 Bd: 1.5 sp/unit 3 Bd: 1.5 sp/unit 4 Bd: 2.5 sp/unit BUILDING DATA # Plan Gross Area Type Parking Req'd 2 DU P1 1262sf 3bd/3ba/2-car tandem 3 spaces 2 DU P2 1325sf 3bd/3ba/2-car tandem 3 spaces 8 DU P3 1483sf 3bd/3ba/2-car tandem 12 spaces 8 DU P4 1734sf 3bd/3.5ba/2-car sxs 12 spaces Totals: 20 DU 30,910sf Gross (Avg. 1,546sf) 30 spaces Total Construction Area: 43,842sf (Gross) Density: ±18.2 du/ac (Gross) Parking Provided: 40 spaces - Garages 7 spaces - Guest 47 spaces - Total Open Space Provided: ±3068sf (±153sf/unit) B-2 BC-100-B 10-PLEX B-1 BC-100-A 10-PLEX

DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS 1 6
L-1
Community open space area with string lights, picnic table seating, trash receptacle, BBQ, and turf area.

Community open space area with lounge seating, trash receptacle, and turf area.

Two community cluster mailboxes, per USPS review and approval.

Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per L2 Wall & Fence Plan.

Enhanced paving at main project entry.

Proposed tree, per L3 Planting Plan.
4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with saw-cut joints. 4' wide unit entry natural colored concrete walk, with saw-cut joints.

Accessible parking stall and striping, per Civil plans.

Guest parking stall.

Natural colored concrete driveway, with light broom finish and tooled joints.

12. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained.

13. 11.

10. 5.

9. 8.

7. 6.

4. 3.

2. 1.

LEGEND

14. 15.

16. 17.

18. 19.

Community dog bag station (black in color), for pet owners.

Property line.

Public street R.O.W.

Transformer to be screened with landscape, quantity and final locations to be determined.

Short term bike parking (1 bike racks to accommodate 2 bike stalls).

Biofiltration area with modular device (per Civil plans); with riparian planting.

Turf area with adirondack seating and specimen tree.
5 4 2 4
6 7 3
7 8 8
10 11 12 11 9
12 13
14 14
14 14
4 15
15 16 17
19 7
6 40'
Scale: 1" = 20'
0 10' 20'
12 12
18 Conceptual Landscape Plan
5732 Lincoln Avenue, Cypress, CA
The Olson Company
Project No.: TOC63
Date: Sept. 6, 2024
Concept - 1st City Submittal
28'-7"
(30' Max. to Eave) LEGEND Stucco Low Profile Concrete "S" Roof Tile Stucco Recess /Reveal at Windows/Doors Half Faux Gable End Vent Exposed Truss Tails w/2x3 Fascia Decorative Stucco Sill Trim Vinyl Window Decorative Stucco over Foam Cantilever Stucco Arched Soffit Stucco Decorative Foam Corbel Decorative Stucco Faux Shelf Metal Railing Fiberglass Entry Door Decorative Shutters Bay Window w/ Fiber-cement Trim & Panels Canvas Awning w/ Metal Brackets Decorative Exterior Lights & Address Sign Metal Utility Door 5 Metal Sectional Garage Door 643217 131211814910 1516171819 8'-1" 9'-1" 8'-1" F.F. T.O.P. F.F. T.O.P. T.O.P.
36'-8"
27'-5"
(30' Max. to Eave) TOP OF STRUCTURE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 0 4 8 16 FACING EAST (DRIVE SIDE) FACING WEST FACING NORTH (STREET FRONT) 3 4 1 2 6 7 8 9 11 13 17 12 14 18 195 15 10 FACING SOUTH LANDSCAPE - PRIVATE WALL A2.0 COMPOSITE B-1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS B-1 BUILDING 157'-9 1/2" 20'-10" 2" 27'-9 1/2"
50'-8"
2'-0 1/2"
2'-4" PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 2 - PLAN 1 - 20'-10" 2" 11'-4" 2" 11'-4" 2" 20'-10" 2" 20'-10" 2" 11'-4" 2" 11'-4" 2" 2'-0" 45'-2" PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 3R - PLAN 3R - RTG R T G W/H W/H W/H T R G G R T W/H TRW/H G W/H T R G G R T W/H RTGW/H RTGW/H TRW/H G PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 2 - PLAN 1 - PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 3R - PLAN 3R - 3'-6" 157'-6"48'-3" FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 0 4 8 16 A2.1 COMPOSITE B-1 BUILDING PLANS B-1 BUILDING PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 2 -PLAN 1 - PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 3R - PLAN 3R - 48'-9" 155'-6"
RIDGE
6:12
6:12
RIDGE
6:12
6:12 RIDGE 4:12 4:12 RIDGE 4:12 4:12
RIDGE
5:12
RIDGE
5:12
5:12
5:12
RIDGE
5:12
5:12
RIDGE
5:12
5:12
4:12
4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 4:12 RIDGE 5:12 5:12 PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 2 -PLAN 1 - PLAN 3 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 3R - PLAN 3R - 48'-9" 155'-6" THIRD FLOOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 ROOF PLAN 0 4 8 16 A2.2 COMPOSITE B-1 BUILDING PLANS B-1 BUILDING 28'-7"
(30' Max. to Eave)
8'-1" 9'-1" 8'-1" F.F. T.O.P. F.F. T.O.P. T.O.P.
36'-8"
27'-5"
(30' Max. to Eave) TOP OF STRUCTURE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 FACING EAST (DRIVE SIDE) FACING WEST FACING NORTH (STREET FRONT) FACING SOUTH A3.0 COMPOSITE B-2 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 0 4 8 16 B-2 BUILDING LANDSCAPE - PRIVATE WALL 157'-9 1/2" 27'-9 1/2" 2" 20'-10"
50'-8"
2'-0 1/2"
2'-4" PLAN 3R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 2R - PLAN 1R - 2" 11'-4" 2" 11'-4" 2" 20'-10" 2" 20'-10" 2" 11'-4" 2" 11'-4" 2" 20'-10" 2'-0" 45'-2" PLAN 3R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 3 - PLAN 3 - RTG RG T W/H W/H G R T W/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H W/H T R G TRW/H TGRW/H GRTGW/H PLAN 3R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 2R - PLAN 1R - PLAN 3R - PLAN 4R - PLAN 4 - PLAN 4 - PLAN 3 - PLAN 3 - 3'-6" 157'-6"48'-9" CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CYPRESS, CA # 20230808 CYPRESS - LINCOLN The Olson Co 3020 Old Ranch Pkwy #100 Seal Beach, Ca 90740 Architecture | Branding Interiors | Planning 17911 Von Karman Ave, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 949.851.2133 ktgy.com Plot Date: 1st Planning Submittal: 04.22.2024 2nd Planning Submittal: 09.13.2024 10.07.2024 FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR A3.1 COMPOSITE B-2 BUILDING PLANS 0 4 8 16 B-2 BUILDING

DSM RTG RG T W/H W/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H RTG R T G W/H W/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H S S D

DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

GAS GAS

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
DW
DW

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW SS SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS
SS SS

SS SS SD RTG RG T W/H W/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H RTG R T G W/H W/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H W/H T R G RTGW/H G R T W/H GTRW/H S S D

DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW DW

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

GAS GAS

UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
DW
DW

SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 10.

FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Receive and File a Residential Parking Permit District Petition and Set a Public Hearing

RECOMMENDATION

2. Set a public hearing for September 8, 2025, to consider establishing the Residential Parking Permit District.

DISCUSSION
The residents of the subject area requested the City address the overflow parking condition created by the Lincoln Center Mobile Home Park and Casa Grande Apartments to the north of the neighborhood. Residents submitted a petition requesting the establishment of a parking permit district due to the lack of street parking.

In February 2005, City Council adopted an ordinance allowing residential parking permit districts to alleviate problems such as the misuse of available on-street parking, traffic congestion, and the inability of residents to park their vehicles near their residences. The ordinance sets provisions for signature gathering and requires at least two-thirds of residents' signatures to submit a parking permit district request. The ordinance includes three criteria for a district:

More than 75% of on-street spaces are occupied during the period permits would be required.

1. 2. The area is self-contained and offers enough parking for residents.

3. More than 50% of parked vehicles are owned by non-residents of the district.

The Traffic Engineer reviewed the parking conditions and the petition and has determined they meet the ordinance requirements. The Traffic Commission reviewed the request at its June 17 meeting and recommended the City Council create the district. As part of the public hearing process, notices will be mailed to all property owners, residents and businesses within 400 feet of the proposed district. Signs will also be placed throughout the within 400 feet of the proposed district. Signs will also be placed throughout the neighborhood and the Lincoln Center Mobile Home Park, and the Casa Grande Apartments have been contacted.

BUDGET IMPACT
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Petition
Traffic Commission Report

CITY OF CYPRESS

AGENDA REPORT
TO: Traffic Commission
FROM: Nick Mangkalakiri, Director of Public Works
MEETING OF: June 17, 2025
SUBJECT: Proposed Establishment of a new Residential Parking Permit District

RECOMMENDATION
Concur with the Traffic Engineer’s recommendation to recommend to City Council that a new residential parking permit district be established in the residential neighborhood north and west of Lexington Junior High School.

BACKGROUND
There are currently four residential parking permit districts in the City that have been established by City Council. Those four districts were established in single-family residential neighborhoods where there were documented severe overflow parking impacts from adjacent commercial properties or high occupancy residential complexes.

In each of those districts, parking restriction signs designed to address the overflow parking condition are posted and residents are allowed to purchase permits exempting their vehicles from the posted parking signs. In each case the application of the residential parking permit program resolved the resident’s overflow parking issues.

In August 2024, the Director of Public Works, City Engineer, and Traffic Engineer met with a group of residents regarding traffic and parking issues in the neighborhood north of Lexington Junior High School. The residents expressed several school safety and overflow parking concerns related to the Lincoln Center Mobile Home Park. In September 2024, the Traffic Commission concurred with a Traffic Engineer recommendation to install red zones in the neighborhood to address undesirable parking behavior. Those red zones have been effective in improving traffic and pedestrian safety; however, they did little to address the overflow parking issues. Discussions between staff and the residents continued over the subsequent months until a mutually agreeable residential parking district proposal was developed that included the posting of “No Parking 2 am – 6 am Daily Except by Permit” parking prohibitions in the entire single-family home neighborhood north and west of the junior high school.

DISCUSSION
In late January of this year the Traffic Engineer provided Bill Wostenberg and Matthew Hajimomen an official residential parking permit district petition for circulation in the neighborhood north and west of Lexington Junior High School. The area proposed for the establishment of the district includes nine streets, 132 properties, and 204 on-street parking spaces.

Item #___2__
Proposed Establishment of a new Residential Parking Permit District Page 2 Meeting of June 17, 2025
Field reviews and surveys of parking conditions by City and Police Department staff have confirmed that parking on two streets, Surrey Drive and Lexington Drive, is regularly more than 75% occupied overnight and over 50% of the vehicles parked on both streets are not registered to residents of the neighborhood. Furthermore, the extent of the overflow parking demand in the entire proposed residential parking permit district is approximately 30 to 35 vehicles per night. A field review by the Traffic Engineer confirmed that there is sufficient on-street parking available on Surrey Drive east of the proposed district area and on Denni Street to accommodate the overflow parking demand found in the neighborhood. Based on field observations and parking surveys, it has been determined that the municipal code parking impact criteria for the consideration of a residential parking permit district with overnight parking restrictions has been met.

Furthermore, the Cypress Municipal Code (CMC) also requires that the Director of Public Works make a determination of a reasonably self-contained area of parking demand and supply when sizing the proposed district. The purpose of this designation process is to ensure that the proposed residential parking permit district is of sufficient size to reasonably encompass the problem area and to offer sufficient on-street parking for residents to obtain parking close to their home. Upon review, both the Traffic Engineer and the Director of Public Works concur that the proposed nine street district is a reasonably self-contained area in accordance with the CMC.

In April, Bill Wostenberg and Matthew Hajimomen returned the official petition to the Traffic Engineer. Staff’s review of the petition revealed that for the two streets that meet the municipal code parking impact criteria, 20 of the 22 property occupants/owners, or 91%, support the establishment of a preferential parking district. Additionally, it should also be noted that only one property occupant/owner openly opposed the establishment of the district, while 83% of all occupants/owners in the entire proposed district support the establishment of a district. Attached is a graphic that outlines the proposed residential parking permit district and the level of support by property. Based on staff’s review of the submitted petition, it has been determined that the municipal code level of resident support for a residential parking permit district with overnight parking prohibitions has been met.

Therefore, it is recommended that the Traffic Commission review this matter, consider public testimony, and concur with the recommendation from the Traffic Engineer. Upon concurrence by the Traffic Commission the matter will be presented to the City Council at a Public Hearing for their consideration and approval.

By:

David Roseman
Traffic Engineer
Nick Mangkalakiri
Director of Public Works
Attachment: Proposed Residenitial Parking Permit District

CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 11.

FROM: Alicia Velasco, Planning Director
DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Approve an Increase to a Task Order with RSG, Inc. for Buyer Verification Services for the Citrus Square Senior Community

RECOMMENDATION
Increase the task order with RSG, Inc. for buyer verification services to $91,128, and authorize a 10% contingency.

DISCUSSION
On October 25, 2021, the City Council approved the 98-unit Citrus Square Senior Community at 9470 Moody Street. The project consists of 50 affordable and 48 market-rate condominiums, all restricted to households with at least one member aged 62 or older.

Affordable units are further restricted to moderate-income households as defined by the State.

On May 8, 2023, the City Council approved an Affordable Housing Agreement (agreement) with the developer, ensuring the affordable units remain restricted to moderate-income households and establishing requirements for the sale and resale of units. At the same meeting, the Council approved a task order with RSG, Inc. for buyer verification services to ensure compliance with the agreement. Only the moderate-income units require third-party verification and the services provided through the task order agreement are paid in full by the developer.

To date, RSG has reviewed 19 applications, with 31 affordable units remaining. The approved RSG task order sets a $1,200 per-application fee, but because each application is unique and presents its own set of challenges, the process has proven more complex and time-intensive than anticipated. An increase in the task order is requested to raise the fee to $1,538 per application to more accurately reflect the cost of processing a typical application.

An additional $6,250 has also been added to the task order for general service questions and research that may be necessary before initiating the formal application process. A 10% contingency is also requested, based on the full task order amount, to cover potential future application increases or general service questions should the services required as part of the agreement continue for an extended period of time. All costs related to the task order will continue to be borne by the developer, and the developer recognizes the added complexity associated with the application process and has agreed to the task order adjustment.

BUDGET IMPACT
None. All costs associated with the task order are paid using developer proceeds held in a trust deposit with the City.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
RSG Proposal
July 17, 2025 Via Electronic Mail
Alicia Velasco, Planning Director

CITY OF CYPRESS
5275 Orange Ave.

Cypress, CA 90630
2025 PROPOSAL FOR LOAN REVIEW OF THE CITRUS SQUARE CERISE SENIOR COMMUNITY Dear Ms. Velasco:

The following is RSG’s (“RSG”) scope of work and budget to assist the City of Cypress (“City”) with the Citrus Square Cerise Senior Community project (“Project”). Since 2023, RSG staff has been assisting the City with the Project’s agreement review, forms and guidelines set-up, household eligibility review for purchasing, pre-approval and loan document preparation/coordination. RSG understands that the Project is still continuing to sell units at an affordable sales price to income restricted buyers at or below a moderateincome level and are age restricted to seniors. At this time, it’s necessary that the scope of work and price is adjusted to continue the loan review activities.

SCOPE OF WORK
RSG staff would continue following activities to ensure that the prospective homebuyers are eligible to purchase income-restricted units in the Project and that an affordable sales price is established.

1. Loan Review Process: RSG works closely with the loan mortgage staff to collect a full file that is ready to purchase the affordable unit and has pre-screened for eligibility by the loan officer. In RSG loan process the following is included:
a. Eligibility of the buyers, loan and all documents submitted are reviewed b. Pre- Approval memo is prepared by RSG staff and submitted to the City to confirm the buyers are below the moderate-income level. Including confirmation that the buyer and are meeting the affordable housing cost calculations. (Affordable sales price calculation is included in the pre-approval memo).
c. Loan documents are prepared by RSG staff and routed to City staff and buyers. d. Loan coordination and closing are confirmed by RSG staff with escrow and loan officer.

2. General Services (as needed): We understand that the loan scenarios may need review to ensure the potential buyers are offered a fair assessment. At times RSG input and feedback is available to provide as needed services or general assistance. RSG staff is available to provide such assistance as needed by all parties involved.

Alicia Velasco, Planning Director

CITY OF CYPRESS

Page 2 ends

FEE PROPOSAL
RSG fee quote for all tasks mentioned above is as follows:
• Task 1. Loan Process: $1,538 per application
• Task 2. General Services: $6,250
Services will be billed on a time and materials basis utilizing the hourly billing rates below:

RSG does not charge clients for travel or mileage (except direct costs related to field work/surveys), parking, standard telephone/fax expenses, general postage or incidental copies. However, we do charge for messenger services, overnight shipping/express mail costs and teleconferencing services. We also charge for copies of reports, documents, notices, and support material in excess of five (5) copies. These costs are charged back at the actual expense plus a 10% surcharge.

RSG issues monthly invoices payable upon receipt, unless otherwise agreed upon in advance. Invoices identify tasks completed to date, hours expended and the hourly rate.

We look forward to working on this engagement with the City and are ready to begin upon the City staff’s authorization. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (714) 316-2111 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Tara Matthews, Principal
RSG, Inc.

Principal $305
Director $$295
Senior Associate $250
Associate $205
Senior Analyst $185
Analyst $170
Research Assistant $$145
Technician $$120
Clerical $100
Reimbursable Expenses Cost plus 10%
CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 12.

FROM: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Receive and File the Investment Reports for the Months Ended June 30, 2025 and July 31, 2025.

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the attached investment reports.

DISCUSSION
California Government Code Section 53607 and Cypress Municipal Code Section 2-18(f) requires the submission of a monthly investment report to the City Council. Due to the cancelation of two City Council meetings in July and August, two reports are being presented for the periods ending June 30, 2025 and July 31, 2025. As of June 30, 2025, the City had $185.5 million (current market value) in cash and investments and the interest return (yield) on the public funds investments was 4.21%. As of July 31, 2025, the City had $179.4 million (current market value) in cash and investments and the interest return (yield) on the public funds investments was 4.28%. As required by the Government Code, all investments are in conformity with the City's investment policy and sufficient cash flows are available to meet the next six months of estimated expenditures.

The attached Summary of Cash and Investments presents the investments held by the City of Cypress as of June 30, 2025 and July 31, 2025. The Investment Report consists of the following five summaries:

1. Summary of Cash and Investments - Provides the total portfolio of the City.

Changes in Cash and Investments - Provides a two-month cash flow analysis by fund type. These separate fund types allow for restricted monies to be segregated and tracked separately. The total ending amount agrees to the current market value shown in the Summary of Cash and Investments.

2. Investments at Market Value by Maturity Date - Provides a list of investments by maturity date, and an indication of the liquidity (ability to turn into cash) of the investments. The California Government Code restricts the type of investments eligible for public funds. The City’s Investment Policy further defines permitted investments.

These restrictions on investment types and the terms of allowable investments tend to result in limited yields on City investments.

3. result in limited yields on City investments.

Interfund Investments - Shows all authorized and outstanding loans between City funds.

The loans from the Infrastructure Reserve Fund to the Cypress Recreation and Park District General Fund relate to the construction of Lexington Park and the rehabilitation of Arnold Cypress Park.

4. Summary of Cash and Investments Held In Trust - Shows the investments held in trust by the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) for offsetting unfunded pension liabilities. The pension trust amounts can only be used for future pension obligations.

The legal restrictions on the allowable investment types are less restrictive than those in the City's portfolio, which provides the ability for the trust to invest in more diverse assets which have the potential to yield a higher long-term rate of return.

5. As mentioned previously, the City had $185.5 million and $179.4 million (current market value) in cash and investments on June 30, 2025 and July 31, 2025 respectively. The investments include Federal Agencies and US Treasuries Debt ($106.3 million at June 30 and $107.9 million at July 31) and Investment Pools ($78.1 million at June 30 and $70.1 million at July 31). The City's bank accounts held $1.1 million on June 30, 2025 and $1.4 million on July 31, 2025.

A portion of the investment portfolio is with the State Investment Pool (Local Agency Investment Fund or LAIF) in which the State's investment experts provide a diversified investment pool for local agencies to invest. By using the combined size of the participating cities and agencies, the State Pool provides a competitive yield, liquidity and investment diversification and management that would otherwise be unavailable to a single entity.

The amount of cash in the City’s checking accounts fluctuates based on the maturity of investments, daily cash receipts, and when vendors and employees are paid. The daily balances maintained in the checking accounts provide credits which offset monthly bank charges. In addition to the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) which insures the first $250,000, excess checking deposits are secured by banks, government, or mortgage securities valued between 110% and 150% of the deposits.

BUDGET IMPACT
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Investment Report for the Month Ended June 30, 2025
Investment Report for the Month Ended July 31, 2025
Summary of Cash and Investments
As of June 30, 2025
Type Description
Investment
Date Maturity Date
Interest
Rate Carrying Value
Current Market
Value (2)
(1) Ckg General Operating Account BMO 7/1/2025 - 1,068,850.22 $ 1,068,850.22 $ Pool Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 7/1/2025 4.269 39,000,000.00 39,046,734.09 Pool Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 7/1/2025 4.269 39,000,000.00 39,046,734.09 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 12/6/2024 11/15/2025 4.393 9,614,200.00 9,853,000.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 1/13/2023 1/13/2026 4.000 2,000,000.00 1,996,820.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 3/2/2023 3/2/2026 4.478 5,001,000.00 5,011,850.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 9/29/2023 4/20/2026 5.000 4,994,229.64 5,031,050.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 11/30/2023 11/17/2026 4.420 5,014,025.00 5,045,000.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 12/19/2024 11/17/2026 4.310 4,725,000.00 4,713,896.25 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 4/18/2024 4/16/2027 5.000 3,015,000.00 3,030,346.35 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 4/18/2024 7/23/2027 5.300 3,000,000.00 2,999,760.00 FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association BMO 11/4/2024 10/28/2027 4.399 3,620,000.00 3,613,266.80 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 11/21/2024 11/12/2027 4.210 9,980,053.59 10,067,300.00 FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp BMO 12/19/2024 12/17/2027 4.243 4,971,808.11 4,981,950.00 FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association BMO 11/4/2024 7/21/2028 4.152 6,988,455.17 7,002,730.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 6/24/2024 7/31/2028 4.288 5,007,245.48 5,062,300.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 2/14/2025 8/14/2028 4.500 5,000,000.00 5,014,400.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 5/27/2025 11/27/2028 4.300 3,140,210.70 3,167,193.15 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 2/15/2024 2/12/2029 4.411 4,648,140.00 4,657,765.50 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 4/18/2024 4/10/2029 4.375 4,948,160.00 5,085,150.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 6/24/2024 5/31/2029 4.241 4,700,114.89 4,823,200.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 12/6/2024 9/30/2029 4.032 4,967,872.37 5,025,350.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 2/19/2025 2/19/2030 4.820 5,000,000.00 5,040,450.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 5/14/2025 5/14/2030 4.545 4,990,000.00 4,999,800.00 Ckg Worker's Comp Account BMO 7/1/2025 - 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ckg Liability Account California Bank & Trust 7/1/2025 - 8,500.00 8,500.00 Cash Petty Cash City 7/1/2025 - 8,350.00 8,350.00

$ 184,461,215.17 $ 185,451,746.45
Average Weighted Yield to Maturity: 4.21%
Average Weighted Days to Maturity: 481.37
(1) Negative cash balance (if any) shown due to checks being issued at month end, transfer to cover checks not made until early in the following month. (2) Current market value of securities with maturities in excess of 12 months (if any) are provided by third-party safekeeping agents.

I certify that this report reflects all Government Agency pooled investments and is in conformity with the Investment Policy of the City of Cypress. A copy of this Investment Policy is available on the City's website.

The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet six months estimated expenditures.

Signed: ________________________________
Finance Director
City of Cypress
Bank/Agent
4/30/2025 +RECEIPTS (DISBURSEMENTS) 5/31/2025 +RECEIPTS (DISBURSEMENTS) 6/30/2025

GENERAL
111/114 GENERAL FUND/GENERAL FUND-GRANTS $ 33,262,882 $ 6,222,953 $ (4,505,290) $ 34,980,545 $ 2,560,143 $ (3,229,253) $ 34,311,435

SPECIAL REVENUE
115 PANDEMIC RELIEF 6,276 - - 6,276 - (6,276) -
212 CRPD-GENERAL FUND 15,378,819 1,405,259 (701,838) 16,082,240 176,799 (1,433,874) 14,825,165 213 CRPD-PARK DEVELOPMENT 8,105 - - 8,105 55 - 8,160
221 TRAFFIC SAFETY 51,717 5,050 - 56,767 4,489 - 61,256 230 STREETS 8,747,574 342,787 (202,924) 8,887,437 300,619 (40,383) 9,147,673 251 LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 5,518,955 117,149 (124,862) 5,511,242 49,312 (316,762) 5,243,792 261 STORM DRAIN 2,284,808 32,808 (33,786) 2,283,830 49,064 (21,351) 2,311,543 262 PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY 1,158,537 - - 1,158,537 7,836 - 1,166,373 271 CORP CNTR MAINT DISTRICT #1 246,057 - (6,713) 239,344 - (5,310) 234,034 280 ASSET SEIZURE 1,176,780 - (20,600) 1,156,180 11,880 (8,375) 1,159,685 291 CABLE TV FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 879,144 14,157 - 893,301 - - 893,301 301 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 91,490 - (14,281) 77,209 45 (4,982) 72,272 311 AB 2766 TRIP REDUCTION 1,285 - - 1,285 16,194 - 17,479 321 SEWER FUND 10,189,814 130,244 (56,679) 10,263,379 217,768 (162,320) 10,318,827 471 LOW AND MODERATE HSG ASSET 46,315 454 (2,590) 44,179 4,813 (768) 48,224

CAPITAL PROJECTS
415 CITY CAPITAL PROJECTS 14,263,266 - (1,247,278) 13,015,988 - (109,434) 12,906,554 416 INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE 51,044,205 - (749,598) 50,294,607 388,414 - 50,683,021

TRUST AND AGENCY
600 TRUST AND AGENCY 1,656,526 160,499 (46,187) 1,770,838 34,991 (30,667) 1,775,162 611 BUSINESS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - - - - - - -
612 CFD #1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 153,575 - - 153,575 - - 153,575 620 REC & COMM SERVICES FOUNDATION 58,898 - (758) 58,140 1,595 (995) 58,740

INTERNAL SERVICE
710 CENTRAL SERVICES 4,090,906 240,601 (195,663) 4,135,844 245,264 (161,042) 4,220,066 720 CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 15,224,571 57,588 (3,331) 15,278,828 61,215 (9,441) 15,330,602 730 TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT 2,273,110 - - 2,273,110 - - 2,273,110 750 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,288,033 1,767,757 (1,001,571) 7,054,219 1,323,442 (843,386) 7,534,275 760 LIABILITY SELF INSURANCE 1,919,430 55,266 - 1,974,696 63,160 - 2,037,856 770 WORKERS COMP SELF INSURANCE 3,608,387 90,001 (44,178) 3,654,210 59,416 (35,915) 3,677,711 OTHER
811/812 WESTCOMM JPA 5,214,489 288,873 (394,023) 5,109,339 159,266 (286,750) 4,981,855 $ 10,931,446 184,843,954 $ (9,352,150) $ 186,423,250 $ 5,735,780 $ (6,707,284) $ 185,451,746 $ Changes in Cash/Investments
City of Cypress
City of Cypress

INVESTMENTS AT MARKET VALUE BY MATURITY DATE
As of June 30, 2025
1 day 181 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years
to to to to to to
Investments 180 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Totals Percent CASH $ - 1,135,700 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,135,700 $ 0.61%
FFCB 12,039,720 - - 10,067,300 5,085,150 5,040,450 32,232,620 17.38% FHLB - - 12,789,243 2,999,760 12,839,359 4,999,800 33,628,161 18.13% FHLMC - - - 4,981,950 - - 4,981,950 2.69%
FNMA - - 3,613,267 7,002,730 - 10,615,997 5.72%
STATE POOL 78,093,468 - - - - - 78,093,468 42.11%
TSY - 9,853,000 - - 9,885,500 5,025,350 24,763,850 13.35% Totals $ 12,039,720 89,082,168 $ 12,789,243 $ 21,662,277 $ 34,812,739 $ 15,065,600 $ 185,451,746 $ 100.00% Percent 48.04% 6.49% 6.90% 11.68% 18.77% 8.12% 100.00%
Scheduled Note
Issue Maturity Interest Authorized Advances * Repayments Principal Note No. To/From Purpose Date Date Rate Amount To Date To Date Outstanding 1 CRPD/
City
Lexington Park
Construction 02/08/21 06/30/25 LAIF 12,800,000 $ 12,293,975 $ 9,101,142 $ 3,192,833 $ 2 CRPD/
City
Arnold
Cypress Park
Construction 11/13/23 06/30/45 2.00% 33,500,000 $ 31,708,701 $ - $ 31,752,714 $ $ 34,945,547
1 2
*

CITY OF CYPRESS

INTERFUND INVESTMENTS
As of June 30, 2025
The Lexington Park note is being repaid with park development fees as they become available.

Effective July 1, 2025, the maturity date of the note is extended to June 30, 2030 and the interest rate will be fixed at 2%.

Beginning June 30, 2025, the CRPD will repay $2 million annually from available CRPD property taxes over the next 20 years.

No additional advances will be made for Lexington Park, however, construction payments are still ongoing for Arnold Cypress Park and additional advances are expected.

Fund Type Issuer
Maturity
Date
One Year
Return * Cost Amount
Current Market
Value
PARS Public Agencies Post-Employment Benefits Trust
Trustee: Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS)
Section 115 Trust Pension Trust Various Open 11.53% 28,890,000.00 $ 37,033,883.13 $ Total $ 28,890,000.00 $ 37,033,883.13
* 12-month period ending with the current month.

City of Cypress
Summary of Cash and Investments Held In Trust
As of June 30, 2025
Summary of Cash and Investments
Type Description
Investment
Date Maturity Date
Interest
Rate Carrying Value
Current Market
Value (2)
(1) Ckg General Operating Account BMO 8/1/2025 - 1,284,446.70 $ 1,284,446.70 $ Pool Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 8/1/2025 4.258 35,000,000.00 35,041,940.85 Pool Local Agency Investment Fund State Treasurer 8/1/2025 4.258 35,000,000.00 35,041,940.85 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 12/6/2024 11/15/2025 4.393 9,614,200.00 9,878,100.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 1/13/2023 1/13/2026 4.000 2,000,000.00 1,996,600.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 3/2/2023 3/2/2026 4.478 5,001,000.00 5,007,450.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 9/29/2023 4/20/2026 5.000 4,994,229.64 5,022,950.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 11/30/2023 11/17/2026 4.420 5,014,025.00 5,033,600.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 12/19/2024 11/17/2026 4.310 4,725,000.00 4,712,148.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 4/18/2024 4/16/2027 5.000 3,015,000.00 3,025,281.15 FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association BMO 11/4/2024 10/28/2027 4.399 3,620,000.00 3,611,927.40 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 11/21/2024 11/12/2027 4.210 9,980,053.59 10,020,000.00 FHLMC Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp BMO 12/19/2024 12/17/2027 4.243 4,971,808.11 4,981,150.00 FNMA Federal National Mortgage Association BMO 11/4/2024 7/21/2028 4.152 6,990,091.52 6,978,440.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 6/24/2024 7/31/2028 4.288 5,010,926.95 5,034,950.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 2/14/2025 8/14/2028 4.500 5,000,000.00 5,002,150.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 5/27/2025 11/27/2028 4.300 3,140,210.70 3,147,228.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 2/15/2024 2/12/2029 4.411 4,648,140.00 4,642,095.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 4/18/2024 4/10/2029 4.375 4,948,160.00 5,067,050.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 6/24/2024 5/31/2029 4.241 4,700,114.89 4,796,650.00 TSY US Treasury Bill BMO 12/6/2024 9/30/2029 4.032 4,967,872.37 4,991,950.00 FFCB Federal Farm Credit Bank BMO 2/19/2025 2/19/2030 4.820 5,000,000.00 5,022,600.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 5/14/2025 5/14/2030 4.545 4,990,000.00 4,999,400.00 FHLB Federal Home Loan Bank BMO 7/3/2025 7/2/2030 4.000 5,000,000.00 4,980,300.00 Ckg Worker's Comp Account BMO 8/1/2025 - 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ckg Liability Account California Bank & Trust 8/1/2025 - 8,500.00 8,500.00 Cash Petty Cash City 8/1/2025 - 8,350.00 8,350.00

$ 178,682,129.47 $ 179,387,197.95
Average Weighted Yield to Maturity: 4.28%
Average Weighted Days to Maturity: 566.49
(1) Negative cash balance (if any) shown due to checks being issued at month end, transfer to cover checks not made until early in the following month. (2) Current market value of securities with maturities in excess of 12 months (if any) are provided by third-party safekeeping agents.

The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet six months estimated expenditures.

Signed: ________________________________
Finance Director
City of Cypress
Bank/Agent
As of July 31, 2025
5/31/2025 +RECEIPTS (DISBURSEMENTS) 6/30/2025 +RECEIPTS (DISBURSEMENTS) 7/31/2025

GENERAL
111/114 GENERAL FUND/GENERAL FUND-GRANTS $ 34,980,545 $ 2,565,171 $ (3,229,902) $ 34,315,814 $ 3,011,648 $ (3,647,783) $ 33,679,679

SPECIAL REVENUE
115 PANDEMIC RELIEF 6,276 - (6,276) - - - -
212 CRPD-GENERAL FUND 16,082,240 176,799 (3,592,708) 12,666,331 227,664 (709,051) 12,184,944 213 CRPD-PARK DEVELOPMENT 8,105 55 - 8,160 - - 8,160
221 TRAFFIC SAFETY 56,767 4,489 - 61,256 4,183 - 65,439 230 STREETS 8,887,437 300,619 (40,383) 9,147,673 456,669 (17,984) 9,586,358 251 LIGHTING DISTRICT #2 5,511,242 49,312 (316,762) 5,243,792 23,053 (278,547) 4,988,298 261 STORM DRAIN 2,283,830 49,064 (21,351) 2,311,543 36,626 (52,658) 2,295,511 262 PLANNED LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY 1,158,537 7,836 - 1,166,373 - - 1,166,373 271 CORP CNTR MAINT DISTRICT #1 239,344 - (5,310) 234,034 - (8,461) 225,573 280 ASSET SEIZURE 1,156,180 11,880 (8,375) 1,159,685 134,390 (6,249) 1,287,826 291 CABLE TV FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 893,301 - - 893,301 806 - 894,107 301 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 77,209 45 (4,982) 72,272 - (11,631) 60,641 311 AB 2766 TRIP REDUCTION 1,285 16,194 - 17,479 - - 17,479 321 SEWER FUND 10,263,379 217,768 (162,760) 10,318,387 149,656 (47,716) 10,420,327 471 LOW AND MODERATE HSG ASSET 44,179 4,813 (768) 48,224 - (4,788) 43,436

CAPITAL PROJECTS
415 CITY CAPITAL PROJECTS 13,015,988 22,105 (109,434) 12,928,659 - (442,590) 12,486,069 416 INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE 50,294,607 2,545,911 - 52,840,518 - - 52,840,518

TRUST AND AGENCY
600 TRUST AND AGENCY 1,770,838 34,991 (34,817) 1,771,012 205,048 (112,263) 1,863,797 611 BUSINESS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - - - - - - -
612 CFD #1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 153,575 - - 153,575 - - 153,575 620 REC & COMM SERVICES FOUNDATION 58,140 1,595 (995) 58,740 4,826 (1,025) 62,541

INTERNAL SERVICE
710 CENTRAL SERVICES 4,135,844 245,264 (161,291) 4,219,817 245,199 (149,275) 4,315,741 720 CAPITAL REPLACEMENT 15,278,828 61,215 (9,441) 15,330,602 80,335 (92,997) 15,317,940 730 TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENT 2,273,110 - - 2,273,110 - - 2,273,110 750 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,054,219 1,323,442 (843,486) 7,534,175 1,362,119 (6,524,224) 2,372,070 760 LIABILITY SELF INSURANCE 1,974,696 63,160 - 2,037,856 69,329 - 2,107,185 770 WORKERS COMP SELF INSURANCE 3,654,210 60,616 (35,915) 3,678,911 62,278 (66,905) 3,674,284 OTHER
811/812 WESTCOMM JPA 5,109,339 160,064 (287,100) 4,982,303 583,032 (569,118) 4,996,217 $ 7,922,408 186,423,250 $ (8,872,056) $ 185,473,602 $ 6,656,861 $ (12,743,265) $ 179,387,198 $ Changes in Cash/Investments
City of Cypress
City of Cypress

INVESTMENTS AT MARKET VALUE BY MATURITY DATE
1 day 181 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years
to to to to to to
Investments 180 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years Totals Percent CASH $ - 1,351,296 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,351,296 $ 0.75%
FFCB 10,030,400 1,996,600 - 10,020,000 5,067,050 5,022,600 32,136,650 17.91% FHLB - - 12,771,029 - 12,791,473 9,979,700 35,542,202 19.81% FHLMC - - - 4,981,150 - - 4,981,150 2.78%
FNMA - - 10,590,367 - - 10,590,367 5.90%
STATE POOL 70,083,882 - - - - - 70,083,882 39.07%
TSY - 9,878,100 - - 9,831,600 4,991,950 24,701,650 13.77% Totals $ 10,030,400 83,309,878 $ 12,771,029 $ 25,591,517 $ 27,690,123 $ 19,994,250 $ 179,387,198 $ 100.00% Percent 46.44% 5.59% 7.12% 14.27% 15.44% 11.15% 100.00% As of July 31, 2025
Scheduled Note
Issue Maturity Interest Authorized Total Repayments Principal Note No. To/From Purpose Date Date Rate Amount Advances To Date Outstanding* 1 CRPD/
City
Lexington Park
Construction 02/08/21 06/30/30 2.00% 12,800,000 $ 12,293,975 $ 9,101,142 $ 3,192,833 $ 2 CRPD/
City
Arnold
Cypress Park
Construction 11/13/23 06/30/45 2.00% 33,500,000 $ 32,009,219 $ 1,548,801 $ 30,460,418 $ $ 33,653,251
1 2
*

CITY OF CYPRESS

INTERFUND INVESTMENTS
As of July 31, 2025
The Lexington Park note is being repaid with park development fees as they become available.

Effective July 1, 2025, the maturity date of the note was extended to June 30, 2030 with an interest rate of 2%.

Beginning June 30, 2025, the CRPD will repay $2 million annually (including principal and interest) from available CRPD property taxes over the next 20 years.

Unaudited; amounts subject to change as part of finalizing the recording of actual FY 2024-25 transactions.

Fund Type Issuer
Maturity
Date
One Year
Return * Cost Amount
Current Market
Value
PARS Public Agencies Post-Employment Benefits Trust
Trustee: Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS)
Section 115 Trust Pension Trust Various Open 8.93% 28,890,000.00 $ 37,176,773.66 $ Total $ 28,890,000.00 $ 37,176,773.66
* 12-month period ending with the current month.

City of Cypress
Summary of Cash and Investments Held In Trust
As of July 31, 2025
CITY OF CYPRESS
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
City Council Regular 13.

FROM: Matt Burton, Director of Finance and Administrative Services DATE: 08/25/2025
SUBJECT: Receive and File Register of Warrants, Transfers, and Wires Issued for the Period of June 7, 2025 through August 8, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file the attached payment register summarized below for the period of June 7, 2025 through August 8, 2025:

Electronic Funds Transfers 17393 through 17818
Warrants 68117 through 68599
Payroll Transfers W1558 through W1562

DISCUSSION
Payments to vendors for goods and services received and/or rendered are initiated and approved by the requesting department in accordance with proper purchasing guidelines.

Processing of these payments occurs centrally in the City's Finance Department with payments issued bi-weekly. A register listing of these payments is typically presented each month at the second regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. This register also includes any Electronic Funds Transfers (EFT), outgoing payroll transfers or wires issued since the previous register was presented to the City Council. Voided payments (if any) are also identified.

All payments are processed on the City's financial management software system. This system generates a payment batch register, sorted by warrant number (or EFT/Wire number), and presents the invoice amount and a description of the payment issued.

BUDGET IMPACT
Total warrants, transfers, and wires issued (net of any voided payments) during the period of June 7, 2025 through August 8, 2025 are $16,789,288.73.

LEGAL REVIEW
None required.

APPROVED BY: Matt Burton, Director of Finance & Administrative Services Attachments
Payment Register for the Period 06-07-25 through 08-08-25 EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount 17393 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 20.43
Fuel/Finance 5/3-6/2 NP68552594 $ 20.43
17394 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 66.97
Fuel/Community Development 5/3-6/2 NP68552594(A) $ 66.97 17395 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 90.12
Fuel/Engineering 5/3-6/2 NP68552594(B) $ 90.12
17396 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 1,491.26
Fuel/Maint 5/3-6/2 NP68552594(C) $ 1,491.26
17397 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 28.27
Fuel/Recreation 5/3-6/2 NP68552594(D) $ 28.27
17398 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 16,879.81
Fuel/Police 5/3-6/2 NP68552594(E) $ 16,879.81
17399 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 6,377.81
Workers Comp Claims/Professional Svcs/#28371-28417 Reimb 6/20/25 $ 6,377.81 17400 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 3,829.26
Workers Comp Claims/Medical/#28371-28417 Reimb(A) 6/20/25 $ 3,829.26 17401 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 3,453.04
Workers Comp Claims/Permanent Disability/#28371-28417 Reimb(B) 6/20/25 $ 3,453.04 17402 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 2,250.00
W/C Monthly Retiree Health Savings 2/25-6/25 2/25-6/25 $ 2,250.00 17403 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 14,640.00
Monthly Retiree Health Savings 6/25 6/25 $ 14,640.00
17404 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 1,200.00
Deferred Comp/Exec Mgmt 6/25 401a-6/25 $ 1,200.00
17405 1271 - UNITED STATES TREASURY $ 6,277.00
Rfd/Unobligated State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Allocation Rfd SLFRF $ 6,277.00 17406 1608 - ALARM PROGRAM SYSTEMS, LLC $ 4,670.14
PD Svc/Alarm Permit & False Alarm Collections 5/25 5/25 $ 4,670.14 17407 1025 - OPENGOV, INC $ 1,661.00
Failed Refund/CDD-23-150/6878 Leilani Lane 6/20/25 $ 1,661.00 17408 1097 - AMS LLC CORE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES $ 16.52 PD Credit Card Transaction Fees 6/6 6/20/25 $ 16.52
17409 145 - AUSTIN, CHERYL $ 56.52
W/C Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 56.52
17410 128744 - AYRES, RICHARD $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17411 102038 - BALDWIN, DARRELL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17412 102087 - BISH, EDWARD $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17413 100101 - BRUCE, THOMAS M $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17414 122419 - CLEMONS, MARK $ 350.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 350.00
17415 129695 - COTE, ROBERT $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17416 128938 - COX, RODNEY $ 123.85
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 123.85
17417 104003 - ESSEX, CLARE $ 611.70
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 611.70
17418 128044 - FORNISS, DANIEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17419 129816 - FOSTER, SCOTT $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25

Page 1 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17420 112187 - HEALY, BRIAN $ 33.33
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 33.33
17421 1535 - HERNANDEZ, JENNIFER $ 60.00
Reissue/Meals/Basic Crisis Negotiations 4/7-4/11 Reissue 6/20/25 $ 60.00 17422 100667 - LASSALLE, ISMAEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17423 123656 - MANUEL, DEAN $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17424 129700 - MCSHANE, CHRIS $ 232.96
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 232.96
17425 2017 - MINIKUS, SCOTT $ 341.78
Reimb/Medical Premiums 7/25 7/25 $ 341.78
17426 128832 - MORALES, PAULO $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17427 122 - MORROW, RICHARD L $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17428 129608 - OLSON, JAMES $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17429 128784 - RAMSEY, KENNETH $ 125.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 125.00
17430 119027 - RAMSEY, STEVE $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17431 130138 - TIMNEY, MATTHEW $ 350.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 350.00
17432 1024 - VALLEY VISTA SERVICES, INC $ 242,549.26
Waste Disposal Fee 5/25 5/25 $ 242,549.26
17433 40 - WARLAND INVESTMENTS COMPANY $ 37,512.00
Development Assistance 7/25 7/25 $ 37,500.00
PD Rental/Substation 7/1/24-6/30/25 007553 $ 12.00
17434 122756 - WINTERSOLE, MICHAEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 7/25 7/25 $ 300.00
17435 2513 - ALCANTAR, HERIBERTO $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-149/11614 Manila Dr Rfd 7/3/25 $ 499.99 17436 2634 - ALLIANCE HOME BUYERS LLC $ 1,000.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-24-253/10401 Whirlaway St Rfd 7/3/25 $ 1,000.00 17437 2635 - BENHAIM, SIGAL $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-28/11600 Cozumel St Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17438 2432 - BITTON, DEKEL $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-92/5084 Sequoia Ave Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17439 2639 - BONILLA, FRANCISCO $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-95/5131 Alaska Ave Rfd 7/3/25 $ 499.99 17440 2107 - BYER, TOM $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-89/4676 Tuscani Dr Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17441 2641 - CARIG, AVERY $ 7,519.00
Refund/Building/Electrical/Plumbing Permit #BS-24-1749 Rfd 7/3/25 $ 7,519.00 17442 2636 - HOYT, BRYANT $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-23-273/5438 Vista Fortuna Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17443 2422 - NISSAN, VERED $ 1,000.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-24-222/6454 Tokelau St Rfd 7/3/25 $ 1,000.00 17444 2422 - NISSAN, VERED $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-24-428/5957 Noumea St Rfd(A) 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17445 2422 - NISSAN, VERED $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-23-141/6162 Rosemary Dr Rfd(B) 7/3/25 $ 500.00

Page 2 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17446 2422 - NISSAN, VERED $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-22-134/5972 Paradise Cir Rfd(C) 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17447 2643 - NORIEGA, JESUS $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-163/4338 Surrey Dr Rfd 7/3/25 $ 499.99 17448 2637 - PATINO, JUAN $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDd-25-72/11720 Cozumel St Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17449 116005 - PERS - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS $ 190,769.48 Med Insurance/City & Dist 7/25 17956201 $ 190,769.48
17450 116005 - PERS - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYS $ 17,009.95 Med Insurance/West Comm 7/25 17956436 $ 17,009.95
17451 2638 - TOKILLAS, TAKEO $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-23-133/4563 Middlebury Cir Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17452 2584 - TOLEDO, FERNANDO $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-24-160/4599 Tuscani Dr Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17453 2585 - VENTURA, DIANA $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-67/5121 Marcella Ave Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17454 2642 - VREELAND, JEREMY $ 137.30
Refund/Plumbing/Electrical Permit #BS-24-1255 Rfd 7/3/25 $ 137.30 17455 2640 - ZACHWOOD INC $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-91/10272 Gregory St Rfd 7/3/25 $ 500.00 17456 1247 - HdL HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS AND ASSOCIATES $ 1,674.00 Svc/Business License Tax Admin 5/25 MAY25 $ 1,674.00
17457 2647 - EVERETT, MIKE $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-107/6642 Sambar Cir Rfd 7/3/25 $ 499.99 17458 2647 - EVERETT, MIKE $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-128/10261 Delano Dr Rfd(A) 7/3/25 $ 499.99 17459 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 7,971.97
Workers Comp Claims/Professional Svcs/#28418-28446 Reimb 7/3/25 $ 7,971.97 17460 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 5,487.95
Workers Comp Claims/Medical/#28418-28446 Reimb(A) 7/3/25 $ 5,487.95 17461 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 3,453.04
Workers Comp Claims/Permanent Disability/#28418-28446 Reimb(B) 7/3/25 $ 3,453.04 17462 2170 - US BANK $ 475.00
PD Sandwiches(60)/Staff/Open House 5/12 0076 6/10/25 $ 475.00 17463 2170 - US BANK $ 389.00
PD Reg/Supervisor's Seminar/CS 8/11-8/12 0076(A) 6/10/25 $ 389.00 17464 2170 - US BANK $ (250.00)
PD Credit/Reg/Adv Search & Seizure/Traffic Stops/JP 6/3-6/4 0076(B) 6/10/25 $ (250.00) 17465 2170 - US BANK $ (125.00)
PD Credit/Reg/Bulletproof Report Writing/JP 6/5 0076(C) 6/10/25 $ (125.00) 17466 2170 - US BANK $ 1,289.38
PD Recruit Training Gear/CR & CS & DN & JJ 6/20 0076(D) 6/10/25 $ 1,289.38 17467 2170 - US BANK $ 968.96
Svc/Cater/Employee Service Awards 5/22 0205 6/10/25 $ 968.96 17468 2170 - US BANK $ 17.40
W/C Sub/Business Analytics/Reporting Software 5/7-6/6 0781 6/10/25 $ 17.40 17469 2170 - US BANK $ 150.00
W/C Reg/Critical Incident Response for Peer Support Teams/MP 7/3 0781(A) 6/10/25 $ 150.00 17470 2170 - US BANK $ 88.87
W/C Dimmer Switch(1)/Console Upgrade 5/26 0781(B) 6/10/25 $ 88.87 17471 2170 - US BANK $ 136.99
W/C Svc/Satellite TV 5/25-6/24 0781(C) 6/10/25 $ 136.99 17472 2170 - US BANK $ 750.00
W/C Dues/National Emergency Number Assoc 5/28/25-5/27/26 0781(D) 6/10/25 $ 750.00

Page 3 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17473 2170 - US BANK $ 25.92
W/C Data Storage/Amazon Cloud 5/25 0781(E) 6/10/25 $ 25.92 17474 2170 - US BANK $ 49.00
W/C Sub/Google IT Online Training/CF 6/25 0781(F) 6/10/25 $ 49.00 17475 2170 - US BANK $ 25.00
PD Dues/CA Assoc of Tactical Officers/JO 6/5/25-6/4/26 1378 6/10/25 $ 25.00 17476 2170 - US BANK $ 100.00
PD Dues/CA Narcotic Officers Assoc/JO 2025 1378(A) 6/10/25 $ 100.00 17477 2170 - US BANK $ 16.99
Sub/Apple Music/Day Camp 6/9-7/31 1504 6/10/25 $ 16.99
17478 2170 - US BANK $ 45.37
Supplies/Employee Service Awards 5/15 2873 6/10/25 $ 45.37 17479 2170 - US BANK $ 201.24
Food/Employee Service Awards 5/15 2873(A) 6/10/25 $ 201.24 17480 2170 - US BANK $ 24.19
Supplies/Employee Service Awards 5/15 2873(B) 6/10/25 $ 24.19 17481 2170 - US BANK $ 425.19
Food/Employee Service Awards 5/19 2873(C) 6/10/25 $ 425.19 17482 2170 - US BANK $ 80.00
Gift Cards(8)/Starbucks/Employee Service Awards Prizes 5/21 2873(D) 6/10/25 $ 80.00 17483 2170 - US BANK $ 161.61
2022 Employee Service Award(1) 6/9 2873(E) 6/10/25 $ 161.61 17484 2170 - US BANK $ 25.00
Reg/Planning Directors Assoc Lunch & Learn/AV 6/11 3033 6/10/25 $ 25.00 17485 2170 - US BANK $ 71.65
Gift(1)/Warland Investments Meeting/AV 5/29 3033(A) 6/10/25 $ 71.65 17486 2170 - US BANK $ 150.00
Sub/Property Data/Code Enforcement & Planning 5/25 3033(B) 6/10/25 $ 150.00 17487 2170 - US BANK $ 3.00
Sub/OC Register Online/MB 5/21/25-5/20/26 3071 6/10/25 $ 3.00 17488 2170 - US BANK $ 15.07
Power Cord(1)/Finance Electric Stapler 6/4 3071(A) 6/10/25 $ 15.07 17489 2170 - US BANK $ 260.00
Reg/Intermediate Gov't Accounting Course/ST 6/10-6/24 3071(B) 6/10/25 $ 260.00 17490 2170 - US BANK $ 175.00
Rent/Tablecloths(14)/Next Up! Business Growth Program 5/14-5/21 3630 6/10/25 $ 175.00 17491 2170 - US BANK $ 6.49
Supplies/Next Up! Business Growth Training Program 5/19 3630(A) 6/10/25 $ 6.49 17492 2170 - US BANK $ 49.93
Food/Next Up! Business Growth Training Program 5/19 3630(B) 6/10/25 $ 49.93 17493 2170 - US BANK $ 66.00
Food/Next Up! Business Growth Training Program 5/19 3630(C) 6/10/25 $ 66.00 17494 2170 - US BANK $ 952.95
PD Pepper Spray(40 Units) 5/27 4142 6/10/25 $ 952.95
17495 2170 - US BANK $ 599.93
PD Lapel Mics(14)/Portable Radios 5/21 4142(A) 6/10/25 $ 599.93 17496 2170 - US BANK $ 400.00
PD Shirts(16)/Special Olympics Torch Run 6/5 4142(B) 6/10/25 $ 400.00 17497 2170 - US BANK $ 25.00
PD Shirt(1)/Special Olympics Torch Run 6/5 4142(C) 6/10/25 $ 25.00 17498 2170 - US BANK $ 10.96
PD Pens(30)/Senior Alert Independent Living Safely Program 6/4 4142(D) 6/10/25 $ 10.96 17499 2170 - US BANK $ 93.35
PD Dog Food(1 Bag)/Bono 5/24 4289 6/10/25 $ 93.35

Page 4 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17500 2170 - US BANK $ 253.06
Imprinted Tablecloth(1)/Concerts on the Green 6/6 5178 6/10/25 $ 253.06 17501 2170 - US BANK $ 47.91
Cables(10)/Power Cords(2)/IT 5/14 5350 6/10/25 $ 47.91
17502 2170 - US BANK $ 20.46
Cables(5)/IT 5/15 5350(A) 6/10/25 $ 20.46
17503 2170 - US BANK $ 155.15
Label Maker(1)/Phone Network Cables 5/16 5350(B) 6/10/25 $ 155.15 17504 2170 - US BANK $ 34.45
Power Cord(1)/IT 5/20 5350(C) 6/10/25 $ 34.45
17505 2170 - US BANK $ 31.88
Toner(1)/Admin 5/12 5530 6/10/25 $ 31.88
17506 2170 - US BANK $ 5.88
Facebook Ads(2)/City Events 5/23 5530(A) 6/10/25 $ 5.88 17507 2170 - US BANK $ 110.00
Sub/Mailchimp/Email Distribution 5/25 5530(B) 6/10/25 $ 110.00 17508 2170 - US BANK $ 165.23
Meals(7)/Chipotle/Council Meeting 5/27 5530(C) 6/10/25 $ 165.23 17509 2170 - US BANK $ 800.00
Deposit/Cater/In-N-Out/Employee Appreciation Lunch 10/22 5530(D) 6/10/25 $ 800.00 17510 2170 - US BANK $ 20.00
Reg/Cypress Chamber Networking Breakfast/LM 6/10 5530(E) 6/10/25 $ 20.00 17511 2170 - US BANK $ 675.00
Reg/League of CA Cities Conference/LM 10/8-10/10 5530(F) 6/10/25 $ 675.00 17512 2170 - US BANK $ 675.00
Reg/League of CA Cities Conference/BP 10/8-10/10 5530(G) 6/10/25 $ 675.00 17513 2170 - US BANK $ 675.00
Reg/League of CA Cities Conference/PG 10/8-10/10 5530(H) 6/10/25 $ 675.00 17514 2170 - US BANK $ 65.00
Reg/Fullerton State of the City/LM 6/26 5530(I) 6/10/25 $ 65.00 17515 2170 - US BANK $ 108.83
Meals(8)/The Loft/Council Meeting 6/9 5530(J) 6/10/25 $ 108.83 17516 2170 - US BANK $ 49.10
PD Binders(24) 5/30 6557 6/10/25 $ 49.10
17517 2170 - US BANK $ 22.35
PD Disinfectant Spray(3 Btls)/Patrol 6/2 6557(A) 6/10/25 $ 22.35 17518 2170 - US BANK $ 10.76
PD Academy Recruit Books(2)/CR & CS 6/4 6583 6/10/25 $ 10.76 17519 2170 - US BANK $ 723.90
PD Academy Recruit Books(10)/CR & CS 6/6 6583(A) 6/10/25 $ 723.90 17520 2170 - US BANK $ 29.20
PD Clipboards(4) 5/23 6696 6/10/25 $ 29.20
17521 2170 - US BANK $ 29.85
Sub/SJ Mercury News Online/PG 5/21-8/20 7052 6/10/25 $ 29.85 17522 2170 - US BANK $ 41.27
Books(2)/Paved Paradise/PG & AV 5/29 7052(A) 6/10/25 $ 41.27 17523 2170 - US BANK $ 12.00
Parking/Warland Group Meeting/PG & AV 5/29 7052(B) 6/10/25 $ 12.00 17524 2170 - US BANK $ 14.00
Decor/Sr Center Dining Room 5/28 7072 6/10/25 $ 14.00
17525 2170 - US BANK $ 7.99
Food/Rec Staff In-Service Training 5/29 7072(A) 6/10/25 $ 7.99 17526 2170 - US BANK $ 25.69
Decor/Sr Center Dining Room 5/29 7072(B) 6/10/25 $ 25.69

Page 5 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17527 2170 - US BANK $ 17.23
Supplies/Sr Center 5/30 7072(C) 6/10/25 $ 17.23
17528 2170 - US BANK $ 26.16
Supplies/Sr Center 5/30 7072(D) 6/10/25 $ 26.16
17529 2170 - US BANK $ 39.96
Food/Rec Staff In-Service Training 5/30 7072(E) 6/10/25 $ 39.96 17530 2170 - US BANK $ 6.73
Supplies/Sr Center Dining Room 6/4 7072(F) 6/10/25 $ 6.73 17531 2170 - US BANK $ 61.18
Pizza Dough Proofing Box(1)/Lid(1)/Sr Center 6/10 7072(G) 6/10/25 $ 61.18 17532 2170 - US BANK $ 34.95
Supplies/Sr Center Dining Room 6/8 7072(H) 6/10/25 $ 34.95 17533 2170 - US BANK $ (153.62)
Credit/Supplies/Arnold Cypress Park Grand Opening 5/14 7667 6/10/25 $ (153.62) 17534 2170 - US BANK $ 4.00
Sub/OC Register Online/JD 5/29-6/25 7667(A) 6/10/25 $ 4.00 17535 2170 - US BANK $ 234.77
Meals(12)/Rec Planning & Team Building Meeting 5/28 7667(B) 6/10/25 $ 234.77 17536 2170 - US BANK $ 158.27
Supplies/Playground 5/15 8543 6/10/25 $ 158.27
17537 2170 - US BANK $ 107.82
Supplies/Playground 5/15 8543(A) 6/10/25 $ 107.82
17538 2170 - US BANK $ 35.55
Supplies/Playground 5/19 8543(B) 6/10/25 $ 35.55
17539 2170 - US BANK $ 64.60
Supplies/Playground 5/16 8543(C) 6/10/25 $ 64.60
17540 2170 - US BANK $ 32.16
Food/Teens Night Out 5/16 8543(D) 6/10/25 $ 32.16
17541 2170 - US BANK $ 32.16
Food/Playground/Kids Night Out 5/16 8543(E) 6/10/25 $ 32.16 17542 2170 - US BANK $ 28.00
Supplies/Day Camp 5/20 8543(G) 6/10/25 $ 28.00
17543 2170 - US BANK $ 45.23
Supplies/Playground 5/21 8543(H) 6/10/25 $ 45.23
17544 2170 - US BANK $ 58.16
Supplies/Playground 5/21 8543(I) 6/10/25 $ 58.16
17545 2170 - US BANK $ 30.33
Supplies/Day Camp 5/21 8543(J) 6/10/25 $ 30.33
17546 2170 - US BANK $ 38.90
Supplies/Day Camp 5/23 8543(K) 6/10/25 $ 38.90
17547 2170 - US BANK $ 61.56
Supplies/Day Camp 5/23 8543(L) 6/10/25 $ 61.56
17548 2170 - US BANK $ 13.95
Supplies/Employee of the Quarter 5/23 8543(M) 6/10/25 $ 13.95 17549 2170 - US BANK $ 69.00
Reg/First Aid/CPR/JT 5/30 8543(N) 6/10/25 $ 69.00
17550 2170 - US BANK $ 9.99
Supplies/Playground 5/20 8543(F) 6/10/25 $ 9.99
17551 2170 - US BANK $ 100.76
Supplies/Youth Sports Summer Camp 5/29 8550 6/10/25 $ 100.76 17552 2170 - US BANK $ 36.62
First Aid Kits(2)/Youth Sports 5/29 8550(A) 6/10/25 $ 36.62 17553 2170 - US BANK $ 161.58
Soccer Balls(3)/Youth Sports 5/29 8550(B) 6/10/25 $ 161.58

Page 6 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17554 2170 - US BANK $ 58.14
Supplies/Youth Sports 5/30 8550(C) 6/10/25 $ 58.14
17555 2170 - US BANK $ 142.03
A-Frame Sign(1)/Lexington Park 6/3 8550(D) 6/10/25 $ 142.03 17556 2170 - US BANK $ 32.04
PD Batteries(24)/Traffic 5/30 8578 6/10/25 $ 32.04
17557 2170 - US BANK $ 77.11
PD Spray Cleaner/Polish(12 Cans)/Motor Units 6/10 8578(A) 6/10/25 $ 77.11 17558 2170 - US BANK $ 39.80
PD Towels(100)/Traffic 6/9 8578(B) 6/10/25 $ 39.80
17559 2170 - US BANK $ 1,260.00
Svc/Quickbase/Bldg/Public Works 5/5-6/4 8756 6/10/25 $ 1,260.00 17560 2170 - US BANK $ 10.00
Svc/Box/Staff Document Review/Engineering 4/29-5/28 9131 6/10/25 $ 10.00 17561 2170 - US BANK $ (47.38)
Credit/Decor/Sr Center Volunteer Recognition 5/14 9213 6/10/25 $ (47.38) 17562 2170 - US BANK $ (35.70)
Credit/Pocket Folders(75)/Sr Center 5/14 9213(A) 6/10/25 $ (35.70) 17563 2170 - US BANK $ 373.07
Imprinted Pens(1K)/Sr Center Giveaways 5/27 9213(B) 6/10/25 $ 373.07 17564 2170 - US BANK $ 523.81
Food(60)/Rec Staff In-Service Training 5/30 9213(C) 6/10/25 $ 523.81 17565 2170 - US BANK $ 935.84
Imprinted Fans(600)/Cups(450)/Concerts on the Green 6/11 9213(D) 6/10/25 $ 935.84 17566 2170 - US BANK $ 20.00
Reg/Spring Brochure Exchange/CP & NG 5/15 9693 6/10/25 $ 20.00 17567 2170 - US BANK $ 1,410.54
PD Gym Equipment(12 Pcs) 6/3 9844 6/10/25 $ 1,410.54
17568 2170 - US BANK $ 100.16
PD Flash Drives(5)/CIB 6/4 9844(A) 6/10/25 $ 100.16
17569 2170 - US BANK $ 240.00
W/C Correct/Svc/Satellite TV 3/25-5/24 0781(G) 6/10/25 $ 240.00 17570 2170 - US BANK $ (240.00)
W/C Correct/Svc/Satellite TV 3/25-5/24 0781(H) 6/10/25 $ (240.00) 17571 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 1,264.40 PD Classic Survivor Benefits 2024-25 17962174 $ 1,264.40 17572 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 2,169.20 PD PEPRA Survivor Benefits 2024-25 17963327 $ 2,169.20
17573 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 26.83
Workers Comp Claims/Professional Svcs/#28447-28450 Reimb 7/18/25 $ 26.83 17574 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 592.43
Workers Comp Claims/Medical/#28447-28450 Reimb(A) 7/18/25 $ 592.43 17575 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 580.00
Workers Comp Claims/Permanent Disability/#28447-28450 Reimb(B) 7/18/25 $ 580.00 17576 2528 - ALTIT, RONEN & MORAN $ 371.20
Refund/Permit #BS-23-1594 Rfd 7/18/25 $ 371.20
17577 1097 - AMS LLC CORE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGIES $ 2.00
PD Credit Card Transaction Fees 7/8 7/18/25 $ 2.00
17578 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 10,337.87 Workers Comp Claims/Professional Svcs/#28451-28474 Reimb(C) 7/18/25 $ 10,337.87 17579 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 2,015.82
Workers Comp Claims/Medical/#28451-28474 Reimb(D) 7/18/25 $ 2,015.82 17580 100505 - CITY OF CYPRESS-WORKERS COMP $ 2,997.89
Workers Comp Claims/Permanent Disability/#28451-28474 Reimb(E) 7/18/25 $ 2,997.89

Page 7 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17581 2647 - EVERETT, MIKE $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-175/4034 Berwick Ct Rfd 7/18/25 $ 500.00 17582 2657 - MC CLAIN, BRENT $ 499.99
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-172/10731 Chestnut St Rfd 7/18/25 $ 499.99 17583 2658 - MIRANDA, BLANCA $ 500.00
Refund/Recycling Deposit/CDD-25-151/5522 Marion Ave Rfd 7/18/25 $ 500.00 17584 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 375.00
W/C RHS 2/25-6/25 2/25-6/25(A) $ 375.00
17585 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 15,690.00
Monthly Retiree Health Savings 7/25 7/25 $ 15,690.00
17586 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 1,200.00
Deferred Comp/Exec Mgmt 7/25 401a-7/25 $ 1,200.00
17587 120801 - MISSION SQUARE $ 525.00
W/C RHS 7/25 7/25(A) $ 525.00
17588 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 129.30
Fuel/Community Development 6/3-7/2 NP68699508 $ 129.30
17589 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 22.03
Fuel/Engineering 6/3-7/2 NP68699508(A) $ 22.03
17590 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 2,348.59
Fuel/Maint 6/3-7/2 NP68699508(B) $ 2,348.59
17591 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 162.68
Fuel/Recreation 6/3-7/2 NP68699508(C) $ 162.68
17592 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 16,200.46
Fuel/Police 6/3-7/2 NP68699508(D) $ 16,200.46
17593 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 186,414.00 W/C Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/Classic 2025-26 Reimb 7/29/25 $ 186,414.00 17594 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 1,216.00 W/C Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/PEPRA 2025-26 Reimb(A) 7/29/25 $ 1,216.00 17595 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 2,018,358.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/City Misc Plan 2025-26 Reimb(B) 7/29/25 $ 2,018,358.00 17596 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 3,318,585.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/City Safety Plan 2025-26 Reimb(C) 7/29/25 $ 3,318,585.00 17597 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 369,323.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/CRPD Misc Plan 2025-26 Reimb(D) 7/29/25 $ 369,323.00 17598 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 6,436.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/City Misc Plan/PEPRA 2025-26 Reimb(E) 7/29/25 $ 6,436.00 17599 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 28,692.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/City Sfty Plan/PEPRA 2025-26 Reimb(F) 7/29/25 $ 28,692.00 17600 168 - CalPERS-Fiscal Services Division $ 1,059.00 Pre-Pay/Unfunded Accrued Liability/CRPD Misc Plan/PEPRA 2025-26 Reimb(G) 7/29/25 $ 1,059.00 17601 1480 - ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS $ 0.63
Fuel/Police 6/3-7/2 NP68699508(E) $ 0.63
17602 145 - AUSTIN, CHERYL $ 56.52
W/C Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 56.52
17603 128744 - AYRES, RICHARD $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17604 102038 - BALDWIN, DARRELL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17605 102087 - BISH, EDWARD $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17606 100101 - BRUCE, THOMAS M $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17607 100863 - CIPA-CALIFORNIA INSURANCE POOL AUTHORITY $ 1,043,269.00 Insurance Permiums 2025-26 1513 $ 1,043,269.00

Page 8 of 42 ends

EFT/ Warrant
Number Vendor Payment Amount Description Invoice Invoice Amount City of Cypress
Payment Register
06/07/25 - 08/08/25
17608 122419 - CLEMONS, MARK $ 350.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 350.00
17609 129695 - COTE, ROBERT $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17610 128938 - COX, RODNEY $ 123.85
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 123.85
17611 104003 - ESSEX, CLARE $ 611.70
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 611.70
17612 128044 - FORNISS, DANIEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17613 129816 - FOSTER, SCOTT $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17614 112187 - HEALY, BRIAN $ 33.33
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 33.33
17615 100667 - LASSALLE, ISMAEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17616 123656 - MANUEL, DEAN $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17617 129700 - MCSHANE, CHRIS $ 232.96
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 232.96
17618 2017 - MINIKUS, SCOTT $ 341.78
Reimb/Medical Premiums 8/25 8/25 $ 341.78
17619 128832 - MORALES, PAULO $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17620 122 - MORROW, RICHARD L $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17621 129608 - OLSON, JAMES $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17622 128784 - RAMSEY, KENNETH $ 125.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 125.00
17623 119027 - RAMSEY, STEVE $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17624 130138 - TIMNEY, MATTHEW $ 350.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 350.00
17625 1024 - VALLEY VISTA SERVICES, INC $ 242,549.21
Waste Disposal Fee 6/25 6/25 $ 242,549.21
17626 40 - WARLAND INVESTMENTS COMPANY $ 37,500.00
Development Assistance 8/25 8/25 $ 37,500.00
17627 122756 - WINTERSOLE, MICHAEL $ 300.00
Retiree Health Care Benefits 8/25 8/25 $ 300.00
17628 2170 - US BANK $ 3,446.93
PD Treadmill(1) 0076 7/10/25 $ 3,446.93
17629 2170 - US BANK $ 320.00
PD Reg/Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum/BL 7/22-7/23 0076(A) 7/10/25 $ 320.00 17630 2170 - US BANK $ 915.80
PD Hotel/Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum/BL 7/22-7/23 0076(B) 7/10/25 $ 915.80 17631 2170 - US BANK $ 178.00
PD Reg/Field Training Officer/CS & JM 5/19-5/23 0076(C) 7/10/25 $ 178.00 17632 2170 - US BANK $ 600.00
PD Reg/Pistol Red Dot Instructor/EC 8/18-8/19 0076(D) 7/10/25 $ 600.00 17633 2170 - US BANK $ 700.00
PD Reg/CA Narcotic Officers Assoc Conference/JO 11/21-11/25 0076(E) 7/10/25 $ 700.00 17634 2170 - US BANK $ 700.00
PD Reg/CA Narcotic Officers Assoc Conference/CP 11/21-11/25 0076(F) 7/10/25 $ 700.00

Page 9 of 42 ends

Cypress City CouncilAugust 25, 2025

Cypress City Council
August 25, 2025