Information Self- PERS Pension
Services Insurance Contributions UAL Total
$3,594,360 $9,404,088 $4,901,354 $31,354,146
(1,067,474) (3,698,040) (2,500) (11,757,108)
(1,681,841) (490,860) (7,049,427)
(2,750,204) (2,750,204)
845,045 2,464,984 4,898,854 9,797,407
(3,925,000) (3,925,000)
(486,420) (486,420)
5,234 10,195 207,740
76,276 $2,000,000 2,103,676
(192,788) (105,275) (1,000,000) (2,156,593)
(111,278) (95,080) (5,411,420) 2,000,000 (4,256,597)
(100,595) (2,521,544)
59,771
1,830,457
(479,103) (479,103)
(11,111) (11,111)
(200,711)
(34,377)
(590,809) (1,356,618)
92,421 309,017 116,713 733,017
235,379 2,678,921 (395,853) 2,000,000 4,917,209
5,058,627 17,089,355 9,965,129 42,999,028
$5,294,006 $19,768,276 $9,569,276 $2,000,000 $47,916,237 ($308,658) $2,623,595 $4,895,196 $9,351,348
1,273,518 2,436,842
(150) (50,766) (59,069)
(1,144)
(1,830,457)
(183,326) 97,982 3,658 (239,864)
(414,000) (414,000)
5,847 1,353 16,343
80,200 208,857 683,935
(22,386) (2,037) (146,527)
$845,045 $2,464,984 $4,898,854 $9,797,407
$1,328,754 $1,328,754
($1,328,754) ($1,328,754)
($265,122) ($265,122)
113
CUSTODIAL FUNDS
Custodial Funds account for assets held by the City as agent for individuals, governmental entities, and nonpublic organizations. Custodial funds are required to be presented separately from the Government-wide and Fund financial statements.
These funds include the following:
• Billing Services – a custodial fund to account for the cash temporarily held by the City in its role as billing agent for garbage collection services provided by Republic Services Group.
• Supporters of Senior Center – a custodial fund to reflect cash held by the City in its role as fiscal agent for the Supporters of Doelger Senior Center, a private nonprofit organization benefiting seniors in Daly City. The Supporters stablish how the sources can be expended and approve disbursements from the account. 115
CITY OF DALY CITY
CUSTODIAL FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Billing Supporters of
Services Senior Center Total
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and investments $1,527,126 $524,011 $2,051,137
Accounts receivable, net 2,806,675 90,000 2,896,675
Total Assets 4,333,801 614,011 4,947,812
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable 4,333,801 2,279 4,336,080
Total Liabilities 4,333,801 2,279 4,336,080
NET POSITION
Restricted for other organizations 611,732 611,732
Total Net Position (Deficit) $611,732 $611,732
116
CITY OF DALY CITY
CUSTODIAL FUNDS
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET POSITION
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Billing Supporters of
Services Senior Center Total
ADDITIONS
Receipts from other agencies $90,000 $90,000
Total Additions 90,000 90,000
DEDUCTIONS
Culture and recreation 1,397 1,397
Total Deductions 1,397 1,397
Change in Net Position 88,603 88,603
BEGINNING NET POSITION 523,129 523,129
ENDING NET POSITION (DEFICITS) $611,732 $611,732
117
STATISTICAL SECTION
This part of the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City’s overall financial health. In contrast to the financial section, the statistical section information is not subject to independent audit.
Financial Trends
These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time:
1. Net Position by Component
2. Changes in Net Position
3. Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
4. Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds
Revenue Capacity
These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City’s most significant local revenue source, the property tax:
1. Assessed Value of Taxable Real Property
2. Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates
3. Principal Property Tax Payers
4. Property Tax Levies and Collections
Debt Capacity
These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current levels of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future:
1. Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type
2. Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding
3. Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt
4. Computation of Legal Bonded Debt Margin
5. Water Utility District
Demographic and Economic Information
These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City’s financial activities take place:
1. Demographic and Economic Statistics
2. Principal Employers
119
STATISTICAL SECTION - (Continued)
Operating Information
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs:
1. Full-Time City Government Employees by Function
2. Operating Indicators by Function/Program
3. Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Sources
Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports for the relevant year.
120
CITY OF DALY CITY
Net Position by Component
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets $84,272,501 $82,583,587 $94,823,140 $97,821,524 $97,958,640 Restricted 20,021,555 17,933,727 19,744,996 20,315,097 19,491,867 Unrestricted 22,495,121 (88,028,802) (64,966,915) (62,902,410) (92,551,797) Total governmental activities net position $126,789,177 $12,488,512 $49,601,221 $55,234,211 $24,898,710 Business-type activities
Net investment in capital asset $67,235,990 $66,278,166 $65,118,626 $64,499,223 $65,137,866 Restricted 11,229 11,231 11,250 11,250 11,281
Unrestricted 34,392,335 20,914,381 28,846,650 32,508,857 27,207,951 Total business-type activities net position $101,639,554 $87,203,778 $93,976,526 $97,019,330 $92,357,098 Primary government
Net investment in capital assets $151,508,491 $148,861,753 $159,941,766 $162,320,747 $163,096,506 Restricted 20,032,784 17,944,958 19,756,246 20,326,347 19,503,148 Unrestricted 56,887,456 (67,114,421) (36,120,265) (30,393,553) (65,343,846) Total primary government net position $228,428,731 $99,692,290 $143,577,747 $152,253,541 $117,255,808 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets $97,757,236 $100,413,948 $96,788,966 $96,249,039 $96,664,081 Restricted 21,237,769 27,367,081 36,133,323 41,351,763 45,536,946 Unrestricted (76,426,827) (76,136,850) (87,745,203) (74,481,450) (64,018,657) Total governmental activities net position $42,568,178 $51,644,179 $45,177,086 $63,119,352 $78,182,370 Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets $66,160,150 $67,108,189 $66,028,084 $65,244,523 $65,069,161 Restricted 11,387 11,325 11,324 1,886,963 2,442,739
Unrestricted 24,735,488 27,617,595 31,433,874 45,343,377 54,584,785 Total business-type activities net position $90,907,025 $94,737,109 $97,473,282 $112,474,863 $122,096,685 Primary government
Net investment in capital assets $163,917,386 $167,522,137 $162,817,050 $161,493,562 $161,733,242 Restricted 21,249,156 27,378,406 36,144,647 43,238,726 47,979,685 Unrestricted (51,691,339) (48,519,255) (56,311,329) (29,138,073) (9,433,872) Total primary government net position $133,475,203 $146,381,288 $142,650,368 $175,594,215 $200,279,055 ($100,000)
($50,000)
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Thousands
Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted 121
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2014 2015 2016 2017
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government $10,889,822 $9,669,627 $10,685,635 $7,972,197 Public safety 42,704,694 43,774,625 45,867,228 63,616,023 Public works 5,597,137 7,579,522 8,196,165 7,573,579
Streets and infrastructure 3,318,214 3,466,347 4,014,914 3,335,132 Culture and recreation 13,350,277 11,621,738 12,263,494 10,221,420 Economic and community development 3,592,174 4,718,470 4,099,948 3,083,160 Nondepartmental
Interest on long term debt 166,114 172,642 40,000
Total governmental activities expenses 79,618,432 81,002,971 85,167,384 95,801,511 Business-type activities:
Water 13,337,352 14,451,497 16,082,814 14,954,595
Civic center 841,901 853,913 892,003 800,786
Transfer station 165,477 178,290 37,579 206,918
Sanitation district 18,262,624 18,629,686 14,325,333 16,357,133 Total business-type activities expenses 32,607,354 34,113,386 31,337,729 32,319,432 Total primary government expenses $112,225,786 $115,116,357 $116,505,113 $128,120,943 Program Revenues
Governmental activities:
Charges for services:
General government $1,034,252 $5,054,225 $4,074,661 $3,850,838 Public safety 4,454,105 5,403,840 6,490,600 6,833,086
Public works 1,036,109 1,528,698 2,524,779 994,308
Streets and infrastructure 1,135,335 1,283,105 1,528,812 1,432,015 Culture and recreation 2,812,145 2,989,174 3,162,473 2,906,739 Economic and community development 2,243,212 4,961,729 6,162,433 4,645,536 Operating grants and contributions 7,901,753 8,467,395 6,311,937 6,293,562 Capital grants and contributions 325,832 3,355,718 2,492,055 1,824,697 Total governmental activities program revenues 20,942,743 33,043,884 32,747,750 28,780,781 Business-type activities:
Charges for services:
Water 18,095,452 18,731,931 16,645,244 17,186,882
Civic center 834,950 976,374 695,906 676,391
Transfer station 375,000 375,000 281,250
Sanitation district 16,676,480 18,416,575 19,695,887 19,284,396 Operating grants and contributions
Total business-type activities program revenues 35,981,882 38,499,880 37,318,287 37,147,669 Total primary government program revenues $56,924,625 $71,543,764 $70,066,037 $65,928,450 Net (Expense)/Revenue
Governmental activities ($58,675,689) ($47,959,087) ($52,419,634) ($67,020,730) Business-type activities 3,374,528 4,386,494 5,980,558 4,828,237 Total primary government net expense ($55,301,161) ($43,572,593) ($46,439,076) ($62,192,493) (a) Beginning in fiscal year 2020, Streets and Infrastructures is reported with Public Works.
CITY OF DALY CITY
Changes in Net Position
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
122
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$11,936,041 $12,476,872 $12,998,948 $13,339,758 $14,340,037 $14,303,115 55,603,978 56,118,396 65,368,018 67,486,476 58,797,739 70,765,037 10,963,753 12,218,279 14,216,669 17,734,741 16,152,556 15,855,694 2,198,287 1,955,081 (a) (a)
12,412,166 12,446,541 12,597,628 10,761,931 14,579,848 16,742,550 5,194,603 4,107,836 4,649,920 5,193,416 7,500,998 6,884,119 1,373,040 1,230,480 1,160,227 820,486 729,892 578,865
99,681,868 100,553,485 110,991,410 115,336,808 112,101,070 125,129,380 17,406,932 15,811,469 17,107,407 16,761,016 15,284,885 18,874,866 961,868 792,490 832,870 863,506 935,680 997,790
266,241 234,590 28,709 (213)
22,460,549 23,578,769 26,304,502 28,264,570 20,832,712 30,021,570 41,095,590 40,417,318 44,273,488 45,888,879 37,053,277 49,894,226 $140,777,458 $140,970,803 $155,264,898 $161,225,687 $149,154,347 $175,023,606 $4,459,835 $664,292 $743,003 $422,110 $724,161 $625,126 7,140,073 5,780,948 6,619,952 5,371,364 5,430,260 5,273,795 1,304,594 1,355,782 4,062,420 4,113,341 4,118,081 3,559,037 1,705,245 1,244,532 (a) (a)
3,115,467 2,859,075 2,105,126 502,031 1,495,986 2,127,987 4,582,767 3,900,404 4,704,318 4,054,903 4,171,831 3,287,643 6,774,088 11,518,920 17,017,844 18,280,149 18,038,910 16,099,060 1,233,529 5,520,111 4,597,424 2,472,075 7,696,982 6,952,706 30,315,598 32,844,064 39,850,087 35,215,973 41,676,211 37,925,354 18,879,659 20,671,704 23,385,773 23,672,903 25,984,982 27,892,142 589,569 801,304 844,360 881,616 1,341,880 1,318,174
21,507,323 22,712,582 22,679,620 23,364,666 23,623,875 25,132,013 2,119,416 2,062,587
40,976,551 44,185,590 46,909,753 47,919,185 53,070,153 56,404,916 $71,292,149 $77,029,654 $86,759,840 $83,135,158 $94,746,364 $94,330,270 ($69,366,270) ($67,709,421) ($71,141,323) ($80,120,835) ($70,424,859) ($87,204,026) (119,039) 3,768,272 2,636,265 2,030,306 16,016,876 6,510,690 ($69,485,309) ($63,941,149) ($68,505,058) ($78,090,529) ($54,407,983) ($80,693,336) (Continued)
123
CITY OF DALY CITY
Changes in Net Position
(continued)
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Accrual Basis of Accounting)
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2014 2015 2016 2017
General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities:
Taxes:
Property taxes $26,609,070 $29,327,703 $29,591,108 $31,417,252 Sales taxes 12,594,335 12,379,135 13,688,644 13,805,186 Utility users tax 6,422,821 6,399,410 6,099,207 6,299,448 Franchise fees 3,663,247 3,675,411 3,828,424 3,878,461
Other taxes 5,247,886 5,322,471 5,761,695 6,017,318
Motor vehicle in-lieu 44,416
Investment earnings 925,838 467,009 828,112 700,994
Other revenues 3,936,433 1,061,054 1,110,702 1,379,422
Transfers 2,853,466 2,983,597 2,060,161 4,616,272
Gain/(Loss) on sale of property (3,003,763) 41,913
Extraordinary or Special item 26,522,377
Total government activities 62,253,096 58,656,443 89,532,343 68,114,353 Business-type activities:
Property taxes 1,558,773 1,713,895 1,754,195 1,859,194
Investment earnings 493,501 265,045 385,674 196,380
Other revenues 918,589 2,350,952 712,482 775,265
Gain/(Loss) on sale of property 5,065
Transfers (2,853,466) (2,983,597) (2,060,161) (4,616,272) Extraordinary item or special item 4,579,613
Total business-type activities 122,462 1,346,295 792,190 2,794,180 Total primary government $62,375,558 $60,002,738 $90,324,533 $70,908,533 Change in Net Position
Governmental activities $3,577,407 $10,697,356 $37,112,709 $1,093,623 Business-type activities 3,496,990 5,732,789 6,772,748 7,622,417 Total primary government $7,074,397 $16,430,145 $43,885,457 $8,716,040 124
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$33,069,899 $36,699,766 $37,261,483 $33,949,879 $45,611,135 $48,895,101 15,232,989 17,699,000 16,371,691 18,566,645 24,157,170 25,774,755 5,977,178 5,906,694 5,769,697 5,912,945 6,008,575 6,934,379 4,022,440 4,178,006 4,536,241 4,255,982 4,909,174 5,016,118 6,408,495 6,854,372 7,278,295 7,300,774 7,587,013 8,268,611 1,058,264 3,113,786 4,581,480 (109,320) (4,574,540) 3,529,876 1,614,584 1,685,805 1,360,090 1,150,745 2,059,402 2,454,244 2,188,873 1,524,773 3,058,347 2,282,058 2,574,893 1,393,960 217,111 11,639 344,034 34,303
69,789,833 77,673,841 80,217,324 73,653,742 88,367,125 102,267,044 1,957,737 2,172,460 2,254,033 2,335,681 2,415,701 2,620,296 268,803 1,096,328 1,518,068 7,164 (1,374,982) 1,067,422 914,539 742,688 478,919 643,228 517,376 815,175
1,146 1,852 1,503 2,199
(2,188,873) (1,524,773) (3,058,347) (2,282,058) (2,574,893) (1,393,960) 952,206 2,486,703 1,193,819 705,867 (1,015,295) 3,111,132 $70,742,039 $80,160,544 $81,411,143 $74,359,609 $87,351,830 $105,378,176 $423,563 $9,964,420 $9,076,001 ($6,467,093) $17,942,266 $15,063,018 833,167 6,254,975 3,830,084 2,736,173 15,001,581 9,621,822 $1,256,730 $16,219,395 $12,906,085 ($3,730,920) $32,943,847 $24,684,840 125
CITY OF DALY CITY
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
General Fund
Nonspendable $186,129 $194,403 $13,453,512 $17,721,519 $17,684,920 Restricted 3,016,958
Assigned 12,103,389 12,220,256 12,098,569 12,111,209 12,047,395 Unassigned 11,838,923 15,059,052 18,329,649 22,681,817 22,589,341 Total General Fund $24,128,441 $27,473,711 $43,881,730 $52,514,545 $55,338,614 All Other Governmental Funds
Nonspendable $2,211 $6,998 $29,668
Restricted $20,021,531 $17,933,698 19,742,741 20,304,044 17,897,042 Assigned 11,873,724 15,906,433 17,525,314 15,076,221 15,972,732 Unassigned 2,072
Total all other governmental funds $31,895,255 $33,840,131 $37,270,266 $35,389,335 $33,899,442 All Governmental Funds
Total Nonspendable $186,129 $194,403 $13,455,723 $17,728,517 $17,714,588 Total Restricted 20,021,531 17,933,698 19,742,741 20,304,044 20,914,000 Total Assigned 23,977,113 28,126,689 29,623,883 27,187,430 28,020,127 Total Unassigned 11,838,923 15,059,052 18,329,649 22,683,889 22,589,341 Total All Governmental Funds $56,023,696 $61,313,842 $81,151,996 $87,903,880 $89,238,056 (a) The change in total fund balance for the General Fund and other governmental funds is explained in Management's Discussion and Analysis.
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Thousands
Total Nonspendable Total Restricted
Total Assigned Total Unassigned
126
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$15,927,953 $14,955,064 $13,875,487 $12,728,449 $11,451,441 3,198,748 3,382,363 3,746,447 5,332,892 5,477,007
12,291,473 12,663,807 375,051 1,055,425 754,432
34,684,815 42,666,860 44,913,148 50,928,350 60,551,062
$66,102,989 $73,668,094 $62,910,133 $70,045,116 $78,233,942 (a) $29,738 $34,625 $25,184 $24,801 $28,151
19,592,976 25,695,472 34,689,298 39,903,527 43,891,822
15,753,688 16,870,159 16,491,889 16,069,890 15,664,989
(86,950) (114)
$35,289,452 $42,600,256 $51,206,257 $55,998,218 $59,584,962 (a) $15,957,691 $14,989,689 $13,900,671 $12,753,250 $11,479,592 22,791,724 29,077,835 38,435,745 45,236,419 49,368,829
28,045,161 29,533,966 16,866,940 17,125,315 16,419,421
34,597,865 42,666,860 44,913,034 50,928,350 60,551,062
$101,392,441 $116,268,350 $114,116,390 $126,043,334 $137,818,904 127
2014 2015 2016 2017
Revenues
Taxes $58,493,320 $60,767,789 $61,030,589 $63,536,267
Licenses, permits and fees 1,697,703 2,679,745 2,889,367 3,023,889 Fines and forfeitures 2,301,580 2,740,510 3,442,372 3,850,382 Use of money and property 1,864,656 1,499,885 1,841,802 1,636,285 Intergovernmental revenues 3,511,403 6,092,246 4,218,152 5,526,235 Charges for services 7,757,549 12,763,912 14,632,874 9,771,337 Other 4,615,471 5,307,064 5,527,147 4,989,727
Total Revenues 80,241,682 91,851,151 93,582,303 92,334,122 Expenditures
Current:
General government 10,882,785 9,495,891 10,777,041 10,067,504 Public safety 42,737,888 44,972,711 49,047,952 50,681,833 Public works 4,712,465 7,053,586 7,589,698 8,480,954
Culture and recreation 11,932,443 10,085,356 10,569,151 10,802,067 Community development 3,896,212 4,917,443 4,306,935 4,340,191 Capital projects 4,149,538 4,359,239 5,726,698 10,019,069 Debt service:
Principal repayment 227,000 244,000 260,000 279,000
Interest and fiscal charges 170,919 235,066 28,730 41,216 Total Expenditures 78,709,250 81,363,292 88,306,205 94,711,834 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
(under) expenditures 1,532,432 10,487,859 5,276,098 (2,377,712) Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Sale of property (3,003,763) 1,600 262,490
Amount paid to State (3,750,000)
Transfers in 5,523,006 6,306,265 5,561,713 6,633,748
Transfers out (5,369,677) (4,750,215) (4,776,760) (2,346,255) Total other financing sources (uses) 153,329 (5,197,713) 786,553 4,549,983 Extraordinary items
Assets transferred to/liabilities assumed by
Successor Agency 4,579,613
Net Change in fund balances $1,685,761 $5,290,146 $6,062,651 $6,751,884 Debt service as a percentage of
noncapital expenditures 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3%
CITY OF DALY CITY
Changes in Fund Balance of Governmental Funds
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting)
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
128
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
$66,939,056 $75,573,768 $75,484,516 $74,390,755 $96,655,679 $103,763,854 2,727,875 2,970,667 3,013,080 2,981,237 3,015,932 2,672,412 3,678,828 3,379,319 3,700,904 3,040,526 2,329,138 2,628,742 2,040,295 3,831,438 5,007,732 564,446 (2,672,633) 4,100,403 5,378,283 8,922,550 14,405,495 13,652,973 14,248,317 11,555,716 9,992,458 11,417,260 12,764,998 9,035,012 9,958,944 9,446,298 6,785,029 2,293,810 1,936,781 2,824,687 4,853,670 3,426,969 97,541,824 108,388,812 116,313,506 106,489,636 128,389,047 137,594,394 10,259,919 9,076,400 10,354,151 12,823,394 13,442,306 14,274,854 51,147,772 54,547,977 56,894,801 63,791,207 68,828,825 70,593,526 8,895,892 9,173,452 9,588,658 9,426,845 9,984,304 10,962,873 10,637,826 11,624,964 11,946,087 10,196,627 13,350,626 15,300,173 5,115,492 4,531,036 4,841,980 5,476,383 7,476,122 6,777,669 6,927,154 7,201,911 10,683,817 9,639,122 6,155,124 8,573,451 298,000 319,000 341,000 365,000 458,851 751,164
38,672 35,165 29,838 23,020 18,134 31,991
93,320,727 96,509,905 104,680,332 111,741,598 119,714,292 127,265,701 4,221,097 11,878,907 11,633,174 (5,251,962) 8,674,755 10,328,693 179,922 11,639 379,095
4,030,049 6,278,010 8,486,521 13,712,986 17,645,383 7,740,180 (7,096,892) (6,014,171) (5,243,786) (10,992,079) (14,393,194) (6,293,303) (2,886,921) 275,478 3,242,735 3,100,002 3,252,189 1,446,877 $1,334,176 $12,154,385 $14,875,909 ($2,151,960) $11,926,944 $11,775,570
0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6%
129
Fiscal Total
Year Total Total Direct
Ended Assessed Assessed Tax
June 30 Secured Unsecured Exemptions Value (1) Secured Unsecured Exemptions Value (1) Rate (2) 2014 $8,951,230 $227,850 $100,563 $9,279,643 $929,050 $51,354 $6,413 $986,817 1.00% 2015 9,426,340 239,970 99,548 9,765,858 980,736 53,445 6,373 1,040,554 1.00% 2016 9,962,576 257,377 98,669 10,318,622 1,011,512 57,075 6,370 1,074,957 1.00% 2017 10,556,650 238,395 97,391 10,892,436 1,050,088 56,063 6,304 1,112,455 1.00% 2018 11,167,466 240,562 96,204 11,504,232 1,102,164 59,029 6,066 1,167,259 1.00% 2019 12,442,279 258,770 95,428 12,796,477 1,175,698 6,187 6,038 1,247,923 1.00% 2020 12,878,232 259,710 94,427 13,232,369 1,294,087 65,154 6,016 1,365,257 1.00% 2021 13,483,669 252,523 93,566 13,829,758 1,299,577 64,182 5,985 1,369,744 1.00% 2022 14,077,399 243,862 93,499 14,414,760 1,304,636 45,533 5,974 1,356,143 1.00% 2023 15,108,819 234,239 92,707 15,435,765 1,517,826 57,274 6,079 1,581,179 1.00% (1)
(2)
Source: San Mateo County Controller's Office Annual Publication: Tax Rates and Valuation of Taxable Property City Redevelopment Agency
California cities do not set their own direct tax rate. The State Constitution establishes the rate at 1% and allocates a portion of that amount by an annual calculation to all the taxing entities within a tax rate area.
CITY OF DALY CITY
ASSESSED VALUE OF TAXABLE REAL PROPERTY
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(in thousand dollars)
plus an increment of no more than two percent annually. These values are considered to be full market values.
The State Constitution requires properties to be assessed at one hundred percent of the most recent purchase price, $0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total City Assessed Value
Total Redevelopment Agency Assessed Value
130
ALL OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Basic Jefferson Jefferson South San Francisco
County Elementary High San Mateo Unified Pacifica
Fiscal Wide School School Junior School Elementary
Year Levy District District College District School Total 2014 1.0000 0.0713 0.0574 0.0194 1.1481
2015 1.0000 0.0662 0.0530 0.0190 1.1382
2016 1.0000 0.0674 0.0583 0.0250 0.0457 0.0250 1.2214
2017 1.0000 0.0680 0.0800 0.0247 0.0467 0.0311 1.2505
2018 1.0000 0.0663 0.0816 0.0235 0.0366 0.0281 1.2361
2019 1.0000 0.0563 0.0739 0.0175 0.0422 0.0517 1.2416
2020 1.0000 0.0667 0.0811 0.0267 0.0381 0.0505 1.2631
2021 1.0000 0.0667 0.0942 0.0213 0.0350 0.0415 1.2587
2022 1.0000 0.0603 0.0650 0.0227 0.0352 0.0288 1.2120
2023 1.0000 0.0647 0.0589 0.0193 0.0306 0.0250 1.1985
Notes:
Source: San Mateo County Controller's Office Annual Publication: Tax Rates and Valuation of Taxable Property
CITY OF DALY CITY
In 1979, State Proposition 13 amended the constitution to provide that the general tax rate be limited to one percent of market value, distributed among all tax agencies. Assessed valuation is set at 100 percent of market value at transfer of title and the tax rate is $1 per $100 of assessed value.
The City of Daly City has 67 tax code areas, many with different rates because of differing school district boundaries. The highest tax rate is shown here.
(Rate per $100 of Assessed Value)
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING PROPERTY TAX RATES
0.0 0.2
0.4 0.6
0.8 1.0
1.2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Rate Per Hundred $
San Mateo Junior College Pacifica Elementary School
South San Francisco Unified School District Jefferson High School District Jefferson Elementary School District Basic County Wide Levy 131
2022-23 2013-2014
Percentage Percentage
of Total City of Total City
Taxable Taxable Taxable Taxable
Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed
Taxpayer Value Rank Value Value Rank Value
Daly City Serramonte Center LLC $498,183,967 1 3.25% $183,596,349 1 2.00% Westlake Assoc Lessee 296,360,733 2 1.93% 124,351,219 3 1.35% Kimco Westlake Lp 177,973,934 3 1.16% 153,372,592 2 1.67% SMC Coastside Properties LLC 167,790,000 4 1.09%
BP3-SF7 2001 JS Owner LLC 122,767,132 5 0.80%
Skyline Heights Llc 97,069,886 6 0.63%
Westlake Skyline Plaza LLC 73,285,216 7 0.48%
SP Peninsula Del Rey LLC 71,026,971 8 0.46%
Daly City Partners LLC 54,986,692 9 0.36%
EQR Hillside LP 47,238,197 10 0.31% 40,364,220 8 0.44%
DB Real Estate Pacific Plaza P - 86,054,399 4 0.94%
Century Theaters Inc Lessee - 59,884,610 5 0.65%
Wasl Daly City Investors V - 56,600,651 6 0.62%
Seton Medical Center - 42,213,102 7 0.46%
Serramonte Corp Center LLC - 39,826,520 9 0.43%
Daly Skyline Assoc LLC 39,574,436 10 0.43%
Subtotal $1,606,682,728 10.47% $825,838,098 9.00%
Total Assessed Valuation:
Fiscal Year 2022-2023 $15,343,058,026
Fiscal Year 2013-2014 $9,179,079,455
Source: San Mateo County Assessor Fiscal Year Combined Tax Rolls MuniServices, LLC
CITY OF DALY CITY
Principal Property Tax Payers
Ten Year History
132
CITY OF DALY CITY
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(in thousand dollars)
#
#
#
Current Percent Delinquent Total Percent of Total
Fiscal Total Tax of Levy Tax Tax Tax Collections
Year Tax Levy (a) Collections Collected Collections Collections to Tax Levy 2014 $16,713 $16,713 100.00% $16,713 100.00%
2015 17,543 17,543 100.00% 17,543 100.00%
2016 18,675 18,675 100.00% 18,675 100.00%
2017 19,707 19,707 100.00% 19,707 100.00%
2018 20,800 20,800 100.00% 20,800 100.00%
2019 23,057 23,057 100.00% 23,057 100.00%
2020 23,820 23,820 100.00% 23,820 100.00%
2021 24,536 24,536 100.00% 24,536 100.00%
2022 25,959 25,959 100.00% 25,959 100.00%
2023 26,011 26,011 100.00% 26,011 100.00%
Source: City of Daly City
NOTE:Current tax collections beginning in 1993 have been reduced by a mandatory tax reallocation imposed by the State of California
(a) Beginning fiscal year 1995, the County began providing the City 100% of its tax levy under the "Teeter Plan", an agreement which allows the County to keep all interest and delinquenc charges collected.
$14,000
$15,000
$16,000
$17,000
$18,000
$19,000
$20,000
$21,000
$22,000
$23,000
$24,000
$25,000
$26,000
$27,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Tax Levy (a) Tax Collections
133
HUD PERS Pension
Fiscal Leases Section 108 Obligation
Year Payable Loan Bonds Total
2014 $2,914,000 $28,380,000 $31,294,000
2015 2,670,000 26,755,000 29,425,000
2016 2,410,000 24,915,000 27,325,000
2017 2,131,000 22,845,000 24,976,000
2018 1,833,000 20,520,000 22,353,000
2019 1,514,000 17,920,000 19,434,000
2020 1,173,000 15,025,000 16,198,000
2021 $1,483,056 808,000 11,810,000 14,101,056
2022 1,287,566 418,000 8,250,000 9,955,566
2023 2,917,312 4,325,000 7,242,312
Business-Type Activities
State Water Total Percentage of
Fiscal Water Resources Primary Personal Per
Year Revenue Bond Board Loan Total Government Income (a) Capita (a) 2014 $5,815,000 $2,748,449 $8,563,449 $39,857,449 1.33% $379.32 2015 5,290,000 2,528,282 7,818,282 37,243,282 1.22% 351.98 2016 4,750,000 2,302,610 7,052,610 34,377,610 0.90% 316.73 2017 4,205,000 2,071,298 6,276,298 31,252,298 0.90% 290.09 2018 3,640,000 1,834,202 5,474,202 27,827,202 0.69% 257.98 2019 3,065,000 1,591,179 4,656,179 24,090,179 0.60% 220.76 2020 2,480,000 1,342,080 3,822,080 20,020,080 0.54% 183.43 2021 1,880,000 1,086,754 2,966,754 17,067,810 0.49% 157.16 2022 1,265,000 825,045 2,090,045 16,191,101 0.46% 149.09 2022 640,000 556,791 1,196,791 8,439,103 0.20% 83.17
Note : Debt amounts exclude any premiums, discounts, or other amortization amounts.
Sources: City of Daly City
State of California, Department of Finance (population) (a) See Demographic Statistics for population and personal income data.
CITY OF DALY CITY
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type
Governmental Activities
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Total Governmental Activities Total Business-Type Activities 134
Fiscal Pension Less: Amounts Restricted Total Percentage of Year Ended Obligation in Pers Contribution Net Personal Per June 30 Bonds Internal Service Fund Debt Income (a) Capita (a) 2014 $28,380,000 $24 $28,379,976 0.94% $270.09
2015 26,755,000 29 26,754,971 0.88% 252.86
2016 24,915,000 44 24,914,956 0.65% 229.55
2017 22,845,000 1,983 22,843,017 0.66% 212.03
2018 20,520,000 23,990 20,496,010 0.51% 190.02
2019 17,920,000 76,072 17,843,928 0.45% 163.52
2020 15,025,000 109,625 14,915,375 0.40% 136.66
2021 11,810,000 549 11,809,451 0.34% 108.74
2022 8,250,000 1,447 8,248,553 0.20% 78.66
2023 4,325,000 118,160 4,206,840 0.10% 41.46
Sources: City of Daly City
State of California, Department of Finance (population) (a) See Demographic Statistics for population and personal income data.
Last Ten Fiscal Years
CITY OF DALY CITY
Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding
135
CITY OF DALY CITY
COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING DEBT
JUNE 30, 2023
2022-2023 Assessed Valuation $15,435,764,556
Total Debt City’s Share of
OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 06/30/23 % Applicable (1) Debt 06/30/23 San Mateo Community College District $708,837,622 5.351% $37,929,901 South San Francisco Unified School District 308,886,397 6.995% 21,606,603 Jefferson Union High School District 250,308,562 49.199% 123,149,309 Bayshore School District 9,020,000 82.669% 7,456,744
Brisbane School District 30,481,439 13.906% 4,238,749
Jefferson School District 133,755,000 86.772% 116,061,889 TOTAL OVERLAPPING TAX AND ASSESSMENT DEBT 310,443,195
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT
San Mateo County General Fund Obligations $589,931,687 5.351% 31,567,245 San Mateo County Board of Education Certificates of Participation 6,120,000 5.351% 327,481 San Mateo County Flood Control District Certificates of Participation 13,890,000 26.691% 3,707,380 South San Francisco Unified School District Certificates of Participation 2,770,000 6.995% 193,762 Jefferson Union H.S.D. Certificates of Participation 47,490,000 49.199% 23,364,605 Jefferson Union H.S.D. General Fund Obligations
City of Daly City Pension Obligation Bonds 4,325,000 100.000% 4,325,000 San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District 3,617,831 5.351% 193,590 City of Daly City Leases Payable 2,917,312 100.000% 2,917,312 TOTAL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GENERAL FUND DEBT 66,596,375 TOTAL DIRECT DEBT 7,242,312
TOTAL OVERLAPPING DEBT 369,797,258
COMBINED TOTAL DEBT $377,039,570 (2)
(1)
(2)
Ratios to 2022-2023 Assessed Valuation
Total Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt 2.01%
Total Direct Debt ($7,242,312) 0.05%
Combined Total Debt 2.44%
Source: California Municipal Statistics, Inc.
Excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, enterprise revenue, mortgage revenue bonds and non-bonded lease obligations.
The percentage of overlapping debt applicable to the city is estimated using taxable assessed property value. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the overlapping district's assessed value that is within the boundaries of the city divided by the district's total taxable assessed value. 136
CITY OF DALY CITY
COMPUTATION OF LEGAL BONDED DEBT MARGIN
JUNE 30, 2023
ASSESSED VALUATION:
Total property assessed value, net of
exempt real property $15,435,764,556
BONDED DEBT LIMIT (3.75% OF ASSESSED VALUE) (a) $578,841,171 AMOUNT OF DEBT SUBJECT TO LIMIT:
Total Bonded Debt (b) $640,000
Less: Revenue Bonds and Certificate of
Participation not subject to limit 640,000
Amount of debt subject to limit 0
LEGAL BONDED DEBT MARGIN $578,841,171
Total net debt
Total Net Debt Legal applicable to the limit
Fiscal Debt Applicable to Debt as a percentage
Year Limit Limit Margin of debt limit
2014 $347,987 $0 $347,987 0.00%
2015 366,220 0 366,220 0.00%
2016 386,948 0 386,948 0.00%
2017 408,466 0 408,466 0.00%
2018 431,408 0 431,408 0.00%
2019 479,868 0 479,868 0.00%
2020 492,637 0 492,637 0.00%
2021 515,037 0 515,037 0.00%
2022 540,554 0 540,554 0.00%
2023 578,841 0 578,841 0.00%
NOTE:
(a) California Government Code Section 43605 sets the debt limit at 15%. The Code section was enacted prior to the change in basing assessed value to full market value when it was previously 25% of market value. Thus, the limit shown as 3.75% is one-fourth the limit to account for the adjustment of showing assessed valuation at full cash value.
(b) 2012 Water Revenue Refunding Bond
(in thousand dollars)
137
NUMBER OF CONNECTIONS BY USERS
Category Number of Connections Category Number of Connections Residential 20,218 Residential 20,114
Multi-Family 1,830 Mulit-Family 1,893
Commercial 778 Commercial 831
City/Government 195 City/Government 194
Traveling Meter 24 Traveling Meter 26
Total Connections 23,045 Total Connections 23,058
WATER UTILITY FUND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
HISTORICAL REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND BOND COVERAGE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Gross Revenues (1) $18,931,871 $20,425,104 $17,186,361 $17,616,918 $19,230,073 Operating Expenses
(including depreciation) (2) 13,276,951 14,354,432 15,950,589 15,337,854 17,077,870 Depreciation (1,261,733) (1,255,728) (1,274,779) (1,342,258) (1,330,058) Operating Transfers Out 2,318,226 2,378,434 1,689,464 2,156,009 2,449,304 Total Operating Expenses 14,333,444 15,477,138 16,365,274 16,151,605 18,197,116 Net Revenue Available for Debt $4,598,427 $4,947,966 $821,087 $1,465,313 $1,032,957 Total Debt Service Requirement $647,050 $647,750 $651,250 $645,450 $649,100 Coverage 7.11 7.64 1.26 2.27 1.59
Notes: (1) Includes all Water Utility Operating Revenue, and Nonoperating Revenue including Nonoperating Interest Income and Transfers in (2) Includes all Water Utility Operating Expenses
Source: City of Daly City Annual Financial Statements
AS OF JUNE 30,2022 AS OF JUNE 30, 2023
CITY OF DALY CITY
WATER UTILITY FUND
138
WATER UTILITY FUND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
HISTORICAL REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND BOND COVERAGE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Gross Revenues (1) $21,203,909 $24,118,100 $24,002,397 $26,160,774 $29,409,352 Operating Expenses
(including depreciation) (2) 15,891,040 17,032,815 16,733,316 15,137,383 18,531,034 Depreciation (1,258,598) (1,247,958) (1,184,182) (1,226,189) (1,347,688) Operating Transfers Out 2,646,419 2,994,662 2,604,001 2,678,853 3,627,155 Total Operating Expenses 17,278,861 18,779,519 18,153,135 16,590,047 20,810,501 Net Revenue Available for Debt $3,925,048 $5,338,581 $5,849,262 $9,570,727 $8,598,851 Total Debt Service Requirement $647,801 $645,325 $649,600 $651,575 $649,258 Coverage 6.06 8.27 9.00 14.69 13.24
139
CITY OF DALY CITY
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Daly City Occupied Persons Unemployment
Population Housing Units per Occupied Rate Annual Per Capita Total San Mateo City as of January as of January Housing Unit Average (%) Personal Personal County Population Year (1) (1) (1) (2) Income (3) Income (3) Population (1) % of County (in thousands)
2014 105,076 31,460 3.320 5.1% $28,627 $3,008,011 745,193 14.10% 2015 105,810 31,468 3.340 4.2% 28,753 3,042,355 753,123 14.05% 2016 108,538 31,738 3.380 3.7% 35,320 3,833,562 765,895 14.17% 2017 107,733 31,957 3.400 3.9% 32,250 3,474,389 770,256 13.99% 2018 107,864 31,560 3.390 2.4% 37,376 4,031,525 774,155 13.93% 2019 109,122 32,151 3.370 2.4% 36,654 3,999,758 774,485 14.09% 2020 109,142 32,167 3.375 5.7% 34,284 3,741,824 773,244 14.11% 2021 108,599 32,407 3.330 6.9% 32,242 3,501,449 765,245 14.19% 2022 104,867 31,777 3.280 2.2% 39,124 4,102,817 737,888 14.21% 2023 101,471 34,049 3.130 4.1% 41,276 4,188,317 737,644 13.76% Sources:
(1) California State Department of Finance
(2) California Employment Development Department
(3) US Census Bureau
0.0%
2.5%
5.0%
7.5%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Unemployment Rate Annual Average (%)
95,000
100,000
105,000
110,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Daly City Population
27,500
30,000
32,500
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Occupied Housing Units
3.000
3.100
3.200
3.300
3.400
3.500
Persons per Occupied Housing Unit
140
Percentage Percentage
Number of of Total City Number of of Total City
Employer Employees (1) Rank Employment Employees (1) Rank Employment Seton Medical Center 1,099 1 5.7% 1,326 1 9.5%
Jefferson Elementary School District 588 2 3.1% 604 3 4.3% City of Daly City 580 3 3.0% 644 2 4.6%
Jefferson Union High School District 574 4 3.0% 511 4 3.7% Kaiser Permanente (3 Locations) 344 5 1.8%
GHC of Sunnyvale LLC 312 6 1.6%
Target Stores - Serramonte 310 7 1.6% 320 8 2.3%
In-N-Out Burger (2 locations) 250 8 1.3%
St. Francis Convalescent Pavilion 244 9 1.3% 350 7 2.5% Home Depot 241 10 1.3%
Genesys Telecommunications Laboratory 508 5 3.6%
Cow Palace 397 6 2.8%
Pacific Gas & Electric 278 9 2.0%
Macy's 265 10 1.9%
Subtotal 4,542 23.6% 5,203 37.2%
Total Daly City Employment 19,214 (2) 13,990 (3)
Note: (1) Includes both full-time and part-time employees (2) Based on ABAG projections & census data
(3) Based on 2012 Economic Census- data only updated every five years Source: City of Daly City Economic and Community Development Department U.S. Bureau of Census
CITY OF DALY CITY
Principal Employers
Ten Year History
2022-2023 2013-2014
141
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Function
General government 53 50 48 44 41 42 44 46 46 47
Public safety 217 217 207 184 185 185 181 182 193 187
Public works 9 13 13 14 15 15 14 12 14 12
Community development 17 19 19 19 20 21 21 19 21 17
Culture and recreation 46 46 46 44 46 41 44 42 50 50
Water 23 22 24 26 24 18 21 22 22 25
Wastewater 43 45 46 49 49 49 48 47 52 45
Streets and infrastructure 12 11 11 11 12 14 12 10 11 12 Internal service 31 30 30 30 29 26 25 25 25 25
Total 451 453 444 421 421 411 410 405 434 420
Source: City of Daly City
CITY OF DALY CITY
Full-Time City Government Employees by Function
Last Ten Fiscal Years
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
General government Public safety
Public works Community development
Culture and recreation Water
Wastewater Streets and infrastructure
Internal service
142
CITY OF DALY CITY
Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Fiscal Year June 30,
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Function/Program
Public safety (calendar year data)
Fire
Fire calls for service 7,497 7,543 8,046 8,204 7,678
Fire inspections conducted * 2,183 2,183 2,238 2,310 2,373 Police
Police calls for service 79,999 84,417 86,688 82,376 71,520 Law violations
Part I crimes* 2,082 1,888 2,020 1,890 1,818
Part II crimes* 4,685 4,899 5,040 4,774 4,523
Group A Offenses* 0 0 0 0 0
Group B Offenses* 0 0 0 0 0
Physical arrests (adults) 2,562 2,931 3,212 3,054 2,531 Physical arrests (juvenile) 207 218 159 160 213
Traffic violations 8,134 7,323 7,515 6,858 4,212
Parking violations 60,301 74,178 96,244 109,025 117,604 Public works
Street repairs - asphalt patching (sq. ft.) 59,050 32,000 38,000 87,780 110,546 Street slurry seal (ft.) 59,140 46,400 78,125 71,517 52,535 Street resurfacing (ft.) 8,444 3,800 11,476 0 3,451
Traffic signal responses 35 116 127 105 131
Street light responses 225 281 202 214 292
Street signs replaced 455 430 305 950 2,175
Streets swept (miles) 25,054 25,224 25,305 25,260 25,460 Line striping and curb painting (linear ft.) 5,600 5,800 4,800 47,250 21,117 Sidewalks inspected (miles) 0 000 1
Culture and recreation
Recreation
Recreation class participants 13,075 14,000 14,800 15,000 16,000 Youth recreation program participants 5,002 4,657 5,814 5,335 3,472 Volunteer support hours 82,475 63,597 68,085 64,359 55,693 Senior meals served 24,700 35,749 40,942 38,027 35,463
Number of health fair events 2 222 2
Health fair events attendance 800 800 800 800 800
Facility rentals (non City events) 1,000 956 981 976 1,042 Library
Volumes in collection - all formats 220,123 220,123 224,431 226,238 228,264 Total volumes borrowed 480,349 480,349 457,642 400,368 368,428 # of uses of electronic resources 60,374 60,413 58,284 37,568 40,240 Youth services program attendance 13,194 16,025 18,967 18,967 17,429 Water
Water service connections 22,910 22,936 22,964 22,983 23,269 Water main breaks 86 95 64 70 50
Average daily consumption (thousands of gallons) 6,571 5,933 6,220 6,220 5,533 Wastewater
Storm drain inlets n/a n/a 2,181 2,181 2,181
Sewer service connections 22,942 22,995 22,965 22,965 23,141 Sewer main blockages 3 322 4
Average daily treatment (thousands of gallons) 6,940 6,382 5,510 5,500 5,500 Source: City of Daly City
Note: n/a denotes information not available.
*CA DOJ Summary Reporting changed to the FBI Standard Incident-Based Reporting **Increase in e-book catalog due to COVID-19 restrictions ***Due to COVID-19 restrictions, many classes and events were canceled, virtual or modified in person 144
CITY OF DALY CITY
Operating Indicators by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Fire
Fire calls for service 8,580 7,426 8,281 8,429 9,525
Fire inspections conducted* 2,552 1,712 1,647 3,642 2,153 Police
Police calls for service 73,291 76,880 58,791 51,216 61,245 Law violations
Part I crimes* 1,779 2,110 2,338 2,325 0
Part II crimes* 4,182 3,306 3,641 1,987 0
Group A Offenses* 0 0 0 0 4,982
Group B Offenses* 0 0 0 0 916
Physical arrests (adults) 2,427 2,459 1,616 1,458 2,313 Physical arrests (juvenile) 168 141 47 43 94
Traffic violations 4,410 6,026 2,448 2,573 3,790
Parking violations 109,526 87,238 85,576 69,136 78,435
Street repairs - asphalt patching (sq. ft.) 217,615 320,000 36,543 42,500 103,128 Street slurry seal (linear ft.) 73,894 85,008 77,616 0 68,857 Street resurfacing (linear ft.) 0 5,195 8,124 0 0
Traffic signal responses 130 126 131 126 42
Street light responses 186 188 256 327 351
Street signs replaced 600 476 350 325 78
Streets swept (miles) 25,260 25,320 21,100 25,200 25,150 Line striping and curb painting (linear ft.) 43,311 51,985 52,592 290 154,636 Sidewalks inspected (miles) 1 1 1 1 1
Recreation***
Recreation class participants 15,500 9,378 2,060 12,607 16,107 Youth recreation program participants 5,139 2,948 790 1,934 4,053 Volunteer support hours 46,480 32,784 786 8,420 26,752
Senior meals served 35,707 34,356 33,810 54,440 46,336
Number of health fair events 4 0 0 0 1
Health fair events attendance 800 0 0 0 300
Facility rentals (non City events) 955 674 44 326 569
Library
Volumes in collection - all formats** 227,245 489,720 466,267 638,843 508,045 Total volumes borrowed 392,978 299,586 202,477 335,007 354,089 # of uses of electronic resources 49,107 43,887 60,345 76,446 86,314 Youth services program attendance 17,503 6,578 3,080 7,479 13,998 Water service connections 23,133 23,140 23,131 23,341 23,055 Water main breaks 88 75 103 93 83
Average daily consumption (thousands of gallons) 5,575 6,150 5,665 5,510 5,405 Storm drain inlets 2,181 2,181 2,181 2,181 2,181
Sewer service connections 23,394 23,350 23,368 23,476 24,315 Sewer main blockages 23543
Average daily treatment (thousands of gallons) 5,500 5,800 5,007 5,250 5,315 Fiscal Year June 30,
145
CITY OF DALY CITY
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
Last Ten Fiscal Years
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Function/Program
Public safety
Fire stations 55555
Police stations 11111
Police patrol vehicles 31 31 31 32 31
Public works
Miles of streets 112 112 112 112 112
Street lights 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,200 3,563
Traffic signals (# of intersections) 40 40 40 40 41
Miles of storm drains 70 70 70 70 70
Culture and recreation
Parks and recreation
City parks 19 19 19 19 19
City parks acreage 200 200 200 200 200
Park trees 2,300 4,144 4,135 3,655 3,655
Playgrounds 26 26 26 26 26
Picnic areas 23 23 23 23 23
Tot lots 77777
Dog off-leash areas 22222
Street landscaped medians (miles) 21 21 21 21 21
Roadway landscaping acreage 500 500 500 500 500
Street trees 2,675 3,067 3,048 3,598 3,598
Community centers and clubhouses 12 12 12 12 12
Senior centers 11111
Gymnasiums 33333
Tennis courts 99999
Artificial turf sports fields 11111
Outdoor basketball courts 15 15 15 15 15
Baseball/softball diamonds 88888
Soccer/football fields 11111
Night sport lighted facilities 66666
Library
City Libraries (# of branches) 44444
Water
Miles of water mains 187 187 187 199 199
Fire hydrants 1,497 1,497 1,497 1,505 1,505
Storage capacity (thousands of gallons) 24,490 23,512 23,512 23,512 23,512 Wastewater
Number of treatment plants 11111
Miles of sanitary sewers 177 177 177 177 177
Miles of combined sewers 14 14 14 14 14
Treatment capacity (thousands of gallons)
Dry weather 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000
Wet weather 25,000 25,000 25,000 19,000 19,000
Source: City of Daly City
Note:
(1) In FY 2014-15, the City completed a digitized inventory of all City owned street trees as well as in City parks with updated numbers Fiscal Year June 30,
146
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Function/Program
Public safety
Fire stations 55555
Police stations 11111
Police patrol vehicles 31 31 32 33 32
Public works
Miles of streets 112 112 112 112 112
Street lights 3,574 3,402 3,678 3,678 3,681
Traffic signals (# of intersections) 41 41 42 42 42
Miles of storm drains 70 70 70 70 70
Culture and recreation
Parks and recreation
City parks 18 18 18 18 18
City parks acreage 200 200 200 200 200
Park trees 3,865 3,865 3,862 3,869 3,874
Playgrounds 26 26 26 26 26
Picnic areas 23 23 23 23 23
Tot lots 77777
Dog off-leash areas 22222
Street landscaped medians (miles) 21 21 21 21 21
Roadway landscaping acreage 500 500 500 500 500
Street trees 3,190 3,196 4,043 3,476 4,032
Community centers and clubhouses 11 11 11 11 12
Senior centers 11111
Gymnasiums 34444
Tennis courts 10 10 10 10 10
Artificial turf sports fields 11111
Outdoor basketball courts 15 15 15 15 15
Baseball/softball diamonds 88888
Soccer/football fields 11111
Night sport lighted facilities 66666
Library
City Libraries (# of branches) 44444
Water
Miles of water mains 199 199 199 199 199
Fire hydrants 1,505 1,505 1,505 1,505 1,505
Storage capacity (thousands of gallons) 23,512 23,512 23,512 23,512 23,512 Wastewater
Number of treatment plants 1 1 111
Miles of sanitary sewers 180 180 180 180 180
Miles of combined sewers 17 17 17 17 17
Treatment capacity (thousands of gallons)
Dry weather 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500
Wet weather 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 19,000
CITY OF DALY CITY
Fiscal Year June 30,
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program
147
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Addendum Agreement with the South San Francisco Unified School District
Recommended Action
Authorize the City Manager to accept and appropriate an agreement addendum with the South San Francisco Unified School District for the afterschool services at Junipero Serra Elementary School.
Background
Since 1994, the City, through the Department of Recreation Services, has offered an Afterschool Youth Recreation Program (AYRP) at Junipero Serra Elementary School in the South San Francisco Unified School District. The program is held each school day, afterschool until 5:30 p.m. and includes homework assistance, enrichment classes, recreational activities, and a daily snack. At the August 14, 2023 City Council meeting, the Council approved an agreement which set forth the respective obligation and responsibilities of the City and the District in providing AYRP services at the above location for the School Year 2023-2024. The District, through their Expanded Learning Opportunities Program (ELOP) funds, reimburses the City for expenses associated with AYRP. The original agreement allocated $50,400 in revenue to cover these expenses.
Fiscal Impact
The addendum will allocate an additional $15,120 in revenue, allowing for more students to enroll under ELOP Funds. The additional funds will be received into account 01-131-141-3743, totaling $65,520. The District shall not charge the City any fees, usage or maintenance, or any facility fee, for the use of their premises to administer AYRP.
Summary/Conclusion
The Afterschool Youth Recreation Program is an essential resource to our community. Thus, it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement addendum with the South San Francisco Unified School Districts for School Year 2023 -2024.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jennifer Der Denise Brown
Senior Recreation Services Supervisor Director of Recreation Services
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Approve Recommended Position Changes in the Library Department and the Department of Recreation Services
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the recommended position changes in the Library Department and the Department of Recreation Services.
Background/Discussion
On September 25, 2023, the City Council approved reorganizing The Department of Library and Recreation Services into two departments - the Daly City Public Library and the Department of Recreation Services. As part of the reorganization, the Library Department received an Administrative Assistant II classification, consistent with the Department of Recreation Services staffing.
The Library Department and the Department of Recreation Services have continued to evaluate the administrative staffing needs of the department over the last 3 months. With the reorganization, the Administrative Assistant II duties have needed to evolve to perform confidential and complex administrative tasks to include coordinating the implementation of new projects, programs, administrative procedures, and prepare and complete reports for special projects.
Staff is recommending that the Administrative Assistant II (Range U 045 of the Miscellaneous/ Unrepresented salary schedule) positions in the Library Department and Department of Recreation Services be replaced with Administrative Assistant III positions (Range U 054 of the Miscellaneous/Unrepresented salary schedule).
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed position changes.
Fiscal Impact
The proposed staffing change will change the anticipated salary savings for the reorganization from approximately $85,000 to $50,000.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the recommended position changes. Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
City Council Meeting Agenda Report
Subject: Recommended Position Changes in Library Department and Department of Recreation Services
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas J. Piccolotti Timothy J. Nevin Natalie Sakkal
City Manager Director of Finance & Director of Human Resources Administrative Services
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Approve Salary Reassignments for Specific Executive Management Positions Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving salary reassignment for specific executive management positions.
Discussion
Staff is recommending salary reassignments for the following Executive Management employees:
1) Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief
Effective November 2020, Resolution 20-179 provided a 7.5% Holiday-In-Lieu Pay to the Deputy Fire Chief and Fire Chief in recognition of the essential nature of services they perform for the community. In October 2021 CalPERS conducted a compensation compliance review of the Deputy Fire Chief’s salary and made an initial determination that the holiday-in-lieu pay did not qualify as “compensation earnable” under the Public Employees’ Retirement Law contending the Deputy Fire Chief position did not require scheduled staffing without regard to holidays. The City has appealed CalPERS’ determination and is awaiting a final decision on this matter.
In order to avoid potential uncertainties regarding whether holiday in lieu pay is compensation earnable, staff is recommending eliminating the 7.5% Holiday-In-Lieu pay for the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chiefs and replacing it with a 7.5% salary increase. Staff is recommending reassigning the Fire Chief salary from Range M455 to Range M471 and Deputy Fire Chief from Range M420 to Range M434 of the Executive Management salary schedule effective the first full pay period following City Council adoption of this resolution.
2) Chief of Police
To address significant compaction between the Chief of Police and Deputy Police Chief, staff is recommending the Chief of Police be assigned to Range M471 of Executive Management salary schedule, effective the first full pay period following City Council adoption of this resolution.
Fiscal Impact
The proposed range adjustment to the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief salary will result in a negligible change to the General Fund budget for FY 2024.
The proposed adjustment to the Chief of Police position will result in a cost of $800 biweekly for Fiscal Year 2024. The Chief of Police position is currently vacant. Should it be filled there is sufficient funding in the department’s salary and benefits budget to cover the additional salary.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving salary reassignment for specific Executive Management employees.
City Council Agenda Report
Subject: Approve Salary Reassignments for Specific Executive Management Positions Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas J. Piccolotti Timothy J. Nevin Natalie Sakkal
City Manager Director of Finance & Director of Human Resources Administrative Services
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to the Employment Agreement of the City Manager
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing execution of amendment to the Employment Agreement of the City Manager.
Background
On January 23, 2023, Thomas J. Piccolotti was appointed by the City Council as City Manager with an initial employment contract term through January 23, 2025. He has 33 years of local government experience, with 24 years with the City of Daly City and has extensive experience dealing with challenges facing local government management.
Over the past year and a half, Mr. Piccolotti has been an inspiring and effective leader serving as City Manager for the City of Daly City. In addition to providing much needed stability to the organization, he has continued the development of a successful Management Team and encourages collaboration at all levels of the organization with an emphasis and a priority on customer service.
He has continued to strengthen his rapport and familiarity with the City Council, Daly City Community and has built effective relationships with a broad-based constituency.
The City Manager’s forward-looking leadership style has assisted him in successfully executing the vision of the Council with many important projects, such as Hillside Park All Abilities Playground (Magical Bridge), a public private partnership for the renovation of Marchbank Park, the Vista Grande Drainage Basin Improvement Project, the Margate Well Project, secured grant funding for the installation of AEDS throughout City facilities and the upgrade of the City’s new Finance/Human Resources Enterprise Resource Planning System and the initiation of several clean energy, sustainable capital projects that are in design and/or will be coming to bid in 2024.
Discussion
The contract amendment terms are proposed as follows:
1. TERM.
a. Initial Term. The Initial Term (“Initial Term”) of this Agreement shall be for a period of forty-eight months (48) months commencing on January 23, 2023 and continuing until January 23, 2027.
City Council Agenda Report
Subject: Adopt Resolution Authorizing Execution of Amendment to the Employment Agreement of the City Manager
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
2. COMPENSATION.
a. Base Salary. As compensation for services rendered under this Agreement, Piccolotti shall receive an initial bi-weekly salary of $14,495.00, effective January 23, 2023 and 6% increase of base biweekly salary effective January 23, 2024, with a 5% increase of the base bi-weekly salary effective January 23, 2025 and January 23, 2026.
City Manager shall have the option to defer increases for each effective year.
b. Bi-Annual Reports. City Manager shall provide City Council with biannual reports on the status of city-wide projects.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolution authorizing execution of amendment to the Employment Agreement of the City Manager, Thomas J. Piccolotti and adopt a resolution approving amendments to the Employment Agreement, herein reference as “Attachment A”.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Rose Zimmerman Natalie Sakkal
City Attorney Director of Human Resources
Attachment “A” – Draft Amendment to the Employment Agreement of the City Manager
SUMMARY DRAFT PROPOSED TERMS
CITY MANAGER FIRST AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT
This CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered on January 23, 2023 by and between the CITY OF DALY CITY, a municipal corporation (“City”) and THOMAS J. PICCOLOTTI, (“Piccolotti” or “Employee”) collectively “the Parties.” The amendment terms as proposed:
1. TERM.
a. Initial Term. The Initial Term (“Initial Term”) of this Agreement shall be for a period of forty-eight months (48) months commencing on January 23, 2023 and continuing until January 23, 2027.
2. COMPENSATION.
a. Base Salary. As compensation for services rendered under this Agreement, Piccolotti shall receive an initial bi-weekly salary of $14,495.00, effective January 23, 2023 and 6% increase of base bi-weekly salary effective January 23, 2024, with a 5% increase of the base bi-weekly salary effective January 23, 2025 and January 23, 2026. City Manager shall have the option to defer increases for each effective year. Said salary shall be paid on the dates and in the manner consistent with the payroll procedures in use for City of Daly City employees. Employee’s base salary shall be increased by the same percentage and at the same time any discretionary across-the-board increase is granted to the City’s Executive Management Group. Thereafter, and subject to a performance evaluation, City may increase Employee’s salary by resolution.
b. Bi-Annual Reports. City Manager shall provide City Council with bi-annual reports on the status of city-wide projects.
All other recitals, paragraphs, subparagraphs and clauses of the Agreement and City Manager Employment Agreement dated January 23, 2023, remain unchanged by the First Amendment to Employment Agreement.
City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Acceptance of Public Access Easement from Giuseppe Ruggiero, Trustee of the Ruggiero Family Revocable Trust, Subject to Exception No. 5, at 400 Castle Street.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to accept the Public Access Easement (PAE) from Giuseppe Ruggiero, Trustee of the Ruggiero Family Revocable Trust, Subject to Exception No. 5, at 400 Castle Street.
Background
The 2020-21 Street Resurfacing project included pavement rehabilitation for streets located in the St. Francis, Hillside, and Serramonte neighborhoods. The streets to be rehabilitated were selected through a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s Pavement Management Program, recommendations from the Street Maintenance Division, coordination with other planned City projects, and availability of funds.
As a federal requirement of the pavement rehabilitation work, concrete curb ramps at street intersections within the limits of work were evaluated for current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. If a curb ramp was found to be deficient, the curb ramp was to be designed and constructed to meet current ADA requirements.
In the design of the curb ramp at the southeast corner of Hillside Boulevard and Castle Street, the City’s designer, Pavement Engineering, Inc., determined that a PAE was needed to construct a curb ramp in a manner that is ADA compliant. City Staff subsequently reached out to the property owner of 400 Castle Street regarding the need and their consent for a PAE on their property.
Discussion
Acceptance of the PAE will allow for the public’s rights of ingress and egress across the property when utilizing the curb ramp at the southeast corner of the Hillside Boulevard and Castle Street.
The attached legal description and plat map for the Public Access Easement Deed have been reviewed and approved by staff and are now ready for City Council acceptance.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with these recommendations.
Summary/Conclusion
Acceptance of Public Access Easement from Giuseppe Ruggiero, Trustee of the Ruggiero Family Revocable Trust, Subject to Exception No. 5, at 400 Castle Street.
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to accept the PAE from Giuseppe Ruggiero, Trustee of the Ruggiero Family Revocable Trust, Subject to Exception No. 5, at 400 Castle Street.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Alexander Yuen Richard Chiu, Jr.
Civil Engineering Associate Director of Public Works
Attachments:
1. Public Access Easement Deed
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Approve the Use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase an Unmanned Ground Vehicle for the Police Department
Recommended Action
Request City Council approve the use of Federal Asset Forfeiture funds to purchase an Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) for use by the Police Department.
Background
A UGV (robot) can be introduced into an environment allowing officers the ability to evaluate and tactically plan a response to a critical incident before committing personnel. This request is to replace our non-functioning Avatar UGV with a new UGV, with the sole purpose of providing situational awareness to officers in uncleared areas.
UVG’s are listed in AB 481 – Military Equipment Use (Daly City Municipal Code 9.56), and as such require Council approval for acquisition and use in a law enforcement capacity.
Discussion
Our current Avatar UVG will be removed from service and destroyed, as it is approximately 10- years old and was a purchased through a County grant as a regional asset. It is no longer functioning, and repairs are not an option as the company has since gone out of business.
Staff evaluated several UGV’s and selected the Mini Vantage from Transcend Robotics. The 4.5- pound Mini Vantage is a throwable remote-controlled vehicle that can be quickly deployed by hand. It can maneuver over small objects, climb up to 8”, and it has a 2-hour runtime. It is only outfitted with a 120-degree color camera, allowing officers the ability to clear an interior space prior to entry. It has a 3-pound payload capacity, which would allow for the ability to deliver a cell phone to a subject for negotiation or communication purposes. The Mini Vantage is not, nor is it designed to be, equipped with any lethal or non-lethal force devices. This UGV would be accessible to patrol and tactical teams to reduce confrontations while responding to critical incidents.
Fiscal Impact
Funding for one Transcend Robotics, Mini Vantage, is available using Federal Asset Forfeiture at a onetime cost not to exceed $18,000.
Summary/Conclusions
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Cameron Christensen
Acting Chief of Police
City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Authorizing the City Manager to Approve a Purchase Agreement for a 2024 TYMCO Model 600 Street Sweeper
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a purchase agreement with TYMCO, Inc. for the purchase a 2024 TYMCO Model 600 street sweeper.
Background
The Public Works Department Maintenance Division manages the street sweeping program for Daly City and sweeps approximately 12,100 curb miles of curbed streets each year. Street sweeping keeps City streets looking well-kept by collecting and removing paper, leaves, and other debris that collects along street curbs. Street sweeping minimizes the risks of blocked storm water facilities that may result in localized flooding during heavy rains and allows Daly City to remain in compliance with local, State, and Federal stormwater regulatory requirements including its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Additionally, street sweeping reduces dust and is an effective method of removing metal particles and other hazardous waste products left by passing vehicles.
Discussion
The Public Works Maintenance Division Street Section operates with three street sweepers, two front-line and one backup. The street sweeper identified for replacement is eight (8) years old and at the end of its seven (7) year lifecycle. The purchase of a new sweeper will allow one of the current sweepers to be rotated to the backup position and the new sweeper will be utilized as a front-line sweeper.
HGACBuy is a national cooperative purchasing program of which the City of Daly City is a member. Daly City has purchased vehicles and equipment through HGACBuy in the past.
TYMCO, Inc. has a current contract with HGACBuy for its Model 600 street sweeper at a price that has been assessed to be fair, reasonable, and competitive. HGACBuy contract number SW04-20 will be utilized for the purchase of the TYMCO Model 600 street sweeper. The total price for the street sweeper, including tax and delivery, is $398,675.95.
The California Government Code authorizes public agencies to participate in cooperative purchasing programs, like those established by HGACBuy, while still adhering to the City's Municipal Code for the procurement of any supplies, vehicles, and equipment. By utilizing the cooperative purchasing program, the City is able to have a more efficient process of procuring vehicles and equipment.
Authorizing the City Manager to Approve a Purchase
Agreement for a 2024 TYMCO Model 600 Street Sweeper
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Fiscal Impact
Sufficient funds to purchase the TYMCO Model 600 street sweeper in the amount of $398,675.95 is available in the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Motor Vehicle Replacement Fund Account 51-315-453- 4558.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve a purchase agreement with TYMCO Inc, for one (1) 2024 TYMCO Model 600 street sweeper utilizing HGACBuy contract pricing, in the amount of $398,675.95.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffrey W. Fornesi Richard Chiu, Jr.
Assistant to the Director of Public Works Director of Public Works Attachments:
1. Tymco HGACBuy Quote Contract No. SW04-20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK RUN SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2023‐2024
MONTH TOTAL
2023 July
August
September
October
November
December
2024 January
February
March
April
May
June
TOTAL
Total for Month Total for Year % of Total
$ 2,702,410.78 $ 20,290,829.18 36.3%
1,274,850.10 6,587,787.89 11.8%
3,525,077.29 28,982,158.22 51.9%
$ 7,502,338.17 $ 55,860,775.29 100.0%
$ 11,989,463.45 8,064,160.79
8,184,063.05
7,969,955.58
12,150,794.25
7,502,338.17
Total:
$ 55,860,775.29 DECEMBER 2023 BREAK DOWN OF EXPENSES BY FUND
Fund
General Fund
Gas Tax Fund
Utility/Enterprise Funds
City of Daly City 12/21/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 1 THU, DEC 21, 2023, 9:34 AM --req: LSUN------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1178123 J160-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ CB CHK 00121223 49024 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N 12/12/23 42,216.74 HW IS Hand Written G R A N D T O T A L S:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Hand Written 42,216.74 Number of Checks Processed: 1 Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total EFTs 0.00 Number of EFTs Processed: 0
Total EPAYs 0.00 Number of EPAYs Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 42,216.74
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 1 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410365 46218R 24/7 ROOTER & PLUMBING SERV 12/15/23 4,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410366 58089 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 12/15/23 1,869.06 MW IS AP CHK 00410367 25627 A S F ELECTRIC INC 12/15/23 1,575.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410368 57716 A-1 TRUCK DRIVING SCHOOL IN 12/15/23 7,150.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410369 57845 A-CHECK AMERICA LLC 12/15/23 70.47 MW IS AP CHK 00410370 53107R ABSTRACT WINDOWS 12/15/23 1,199.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410371 50997R AC HEATING & COOLING SERVIC 12/15/23 263.89 MW IS AP CHK 00410372 56621 ACC BUSINESS 12/15/23 4,268.26 MW IS AP CHK 00410373 57213 ACOUSTICAL SOLUTIONS LLC 12/15/23 5,653.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410374 53561 ACTION TOWING 12/15/23 170.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410375 1514 ADAM HILL COMPANY, THE 12/15/23 2,219.23 MW IS AP CHK 00410376 5034 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS 12/15/23 2,260.85 MW IS AP CHK 00410377 56623 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST MA 12/15/23 1,535.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410378 55762 AGE OF LEARNING INC 12/15/23 2,500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410379 58072 AHKIONG, TUESE 12/15/23 700.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410380 29880 AIRGAS USA LLC 12/15/23 61.65 MW IS AP CHK 00410381 48347 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OF 12/15/23 937.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410382 1465 ALBERTSONS SAFEWAY 12/15/23 2,749.96 MW IS AP CHK 00410383 50363R ALCARAZ, URSULA 12/15/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410384 14004 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY 12/15/23 1,445.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410385 1025 ALHAMBRA 12/15/23 315.25 MW IS
AP CHK 00410386 37095 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUP 12/15/23 2,517.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410387 39657 ALL STAR GLASS 12/15/23 1,055.53 MW IS AP CHK 00410388 37116 ALPHA ANALYTICAL LABORATORI 12/15/23 6,815.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410389 39355 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 12/15/23 66.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410390 22125 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 12/15/23 105,949.19 MW IS AP CHK 00410391 56231 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 12/15/23 4,295.09 MW IS AP CHK 00410392 26914 AMERICAN ASPHALT REPAIR & R 12/15/23 39,100.00 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 2 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410393 45439JPA AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE 12/15/23 500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410394 38846 AMERICAN MESSAGING 12/15/23 30.34 MW IS AP CHK 00410395 56082R AMERICAN STANDARD ROOFING I 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410396 58085R ANICETE, NICO 12/15/23 460.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410397 48649R ANTEA GROUP INC USA 12/15/23 8,500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410398 1101 AT&T 12/15/23 243.78 MW IS
AP CHK 00410399 32577 AT&T 12/15/23 537.46 MW IS
AP CHK 00410400 32577 AT&T 12/15/23 1,046.42 MW IS
AP CHK 00410401 45195 AT&T 12/15/23 850.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410402 47003 AT&T 12/15/23 157.92 MW IS
AP CHK 00410403 47003 AT&T 12/15/23 136.52 MW IS
AP CHK 00410404 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/15/23 141.46 MW IS AP CHK 00410405 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/15/23 392.07 MW IS AP CHK 00410406 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/15/23 1,616.65 MW IS AP CHK 00410407 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/15/23 135.28 MW IS AP CHK 00410408 44649 ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS LLC 12/15/23 1,599.26 MW IS AP CHK 00410409 29643 AUTO COLLISION CENTER 12/15/23 3,109.69 MW IS AP CHK 00410410 56541 AW ENTERPRISES INC 12/15/23 1,580.86 MW IS AP CHK 00410411 40254 AWE 12/15/23 7,222.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410412 2495 BARKER BLUE DIGITAL IMAGING 12/15/23 1,643.86 MW IS AP CHK 00410413 7950 BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGE 12/15/23 5,580.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410414 19892 BAY AREA PAVING COMPANY INC 12/15/23 9,874.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410415 8796 BAY CITY BOILER 12/15/23 7,141.88 MW IS AP CHK 00410416 54911 BAYSIDE COLLISION CENTER 12/15/23 450.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410417 19200 BIRITE FOODSERVICE DISTRIBU 12/15/23 4,742.27 MW IS AP CHK 00410418 20204 BKF ENGINEERS 12/15/23 20,215.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410419 22205 BLACKSTONE PUBLISHING 12/15/23 250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410420 35495 BLUE WATER TOWING & AUTO SE 12/15/23 60.00 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 3 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410421 17202 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 12/15/23 869.69 MW IS AP CHK 00410422 57279 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE 12/15/23 20,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410423 56068 BRADSHAW CONSTRUCTION 12/15/23 8,775.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410424 3349 BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 12/15/23 554.64 MW IS AP CHK 00410425 3064 BROWN & CALDWELL INC 12/15/23 15,224.01 MW IS AP CHK 00410426 21239R BROWN, DENISE 12/15/23 255.76 MW IS AP CHK 00410427 48259 BWNVT MOTORS INC 12/15/23 68,948.57 MW IS AP CHK 00410428 24936R CABATIC, VICTOR 12/15/23 809.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410429 46072R CABLECOM LLC 12/15/23 3,125.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410430 54295R CABLECOM LLC 12/15/23 6,250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410431 36927 CALCON SYSTEMS INC 12/15/23 82,448.29 MW IS AP CHK 00410432 1196 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 12/15/23 301.05 MW IS AP CHK 00410433 43533 CAPE 12/15/23 110.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410434 58038 CARDIO PARTNERS INC 12/15/23 7,394.40 MW IS AP CHK 00410435 17888 CARL WARREN & COMPANY INC 12/15/23 1,232.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410436 48351 CAVENDISH SQUARE PUBLISHING 12/15/23 408.82 MW IS AP CHK 00410437 28636 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 12/15/23 4,101.04 MW IS AP CHK 00410438 42277 CEL ANALYTICAL INC 12/15/23 15,493.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410439 40247 CELLEBRITE INC. 12/15/23 7,086.94 MW IS AP CHK 00410440 48009 CENGAGE LEARNING INC / GALE 12/15/23 344.47 MW IS AP CHK 00410441 1403 CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE 12/15/23 7,455.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410442 24769 CENTER POINT LARGE PRINT 12/15/23 47.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410443 31956 CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FOR 12/15/23 336.02 MW IS AP CHK 00410444 54918R CFY CONSTRUCTION INC 12/15/23 418.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410445 58079R CHII TRUST, MAHARBA 12/15/23 10,586.91 MW IS AP CHK 00410446 51204 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/15/23 731.40 MW IS AP CHK 00410447 3678 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 12/15/23 3,044.19 MW IS AP CHK 00410448 35395 CITY AUTO SUPPLY 12/15/23 2,464.44 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 4 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410449 55905 CITY CONSULTANTS & RESEARCH 12/15/23 425.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410450 25602 CITY OF DALY CITY 12/15/23 85.68 MW IS AP CHK 00410451 40147 CITY TOYOTA 12/15/23 5,889.95 MW IS AP CHK 00410452 56237 CLAREMONT BEHAVIORAL SERVIC 12/15/23 1,384.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410453 18465 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 12/15/23 107.68 MW IS AP CHK 00410454 20689 COIT SERVICES INC 12/15/23 2,133.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410455 42205 COLMA FIREMEN'S SOCIAL CLUB 12/15/23 60.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410456 26650 COLMA POLICE DEPARTMENT 12/15/23 1,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410457 47244 COMCAST 12/15/23 94.77 MW IS
AP CHK 00410458 48517 COMCAST 12/15/23 157.45 MW IS
AP CHK 00410459 48645 COMCAST 12/15/23 86.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410460 49446 COMCAST 12/15/23 118.33 MW IS
AP CHK 00410461 49446 COMCAST 12/15/23 108.33 MW IS
AP CHK 00410462 51804 COMCAST 12/15/23 407.96 MW IS
AP CHK 00410463 56468 COMCAST 12/15/23 20.45 MW IS
AP CHK 00410464 56468 COMCAST 12/15/23 217.90 MW IS
AP CHK 00410465 56819 COMCAST 12/15/23 192.90 MW IS
AP CHK 00410466 57411 COMCAST 12/15/23 167.21 MW IS
AP CHK 00410467 12578 COMPLETE LINEN SERVICES INC 12/15/23 140.18 MW IS AP CHK 00410468 2599 CONTINUING EDUCATION OF THE 12/15/23 4,353.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410469 23480 COPWARE INC 12/15/23 2,550.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410470 56253 CORE & MAIN LP 12/15/23 5,193.07 MW IS AP CHK 00410471 30109 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 12/15/23 199.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410472 27948 COTTON SHIRES AND ASSOCIATE 12/15/23 6,982.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410473 G-ALLEN2 COURT-ORDERED DEBT COLLECTI 12/15/23 112.48 MW IS AP CHK 00410474 1053 CPS HR CONSULTING 12/15/23 421.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410475 56617R CRUZ, AURA JOMELIE 12/15/23 721.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410476 48323 CRYSTAL CREAMERY 12/15/23 693.42 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 5 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410477 28906 CSG CONSULTANTS INC 12/15/23 28,360.95 MW IS AP CHK 00410478 2293 CSMFO 12/15/23 55.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410479 1836 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 12/15/23 663.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410480 1414 DALY CITY CENTRAL CASHIER 12/15/23 1,776.03 MW IS AP CHK 00410481 48520 DALY CITY PARTNERSHIP 12/15/23 34,033.48 MW IS AP CHK 00410482 1793 DALY CITY TOOL MART 12/15/23 241.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410483 51806 DAVID J POWERS & ASSOCIATES 12/15/23 14,693.66 MW IS AP CHK 00410484 1299 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410485 58087R DIONES, EDMOND 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410486 26138R DISCOUNT PLUMBING & HEATING 12/15/23 2,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410487 54557 DKF SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC 12/15/23 3,999.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410488 58073R DR TRAFFIC CONTROL LLC 12/15/23 1,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410489 57393 DTA 12/15/23 1,184.50 MW IS
AP CHK 00410490 56989 DUDEK 12/15/23 2,910.95 MW IS
AP CHK 00410491 40801R DUMANDAN, WILGRACE 12/15/23 721.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410492 1061 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 12/15/23 437.12 MW IS AP CHK 00410493 48177 EAST BAY TIRE CO 12/15/23 1,006.42 MW IS AP CHK 00410494 57650R EDGE ROOFING 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410495 54143 EKI ENVIRONMENT & WATER 12/15/23 3,670.16 MW IS AP CHK 00410496 56187 ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS LAW CO 12/15/23 6,815.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410497 56297 EME ENTERPRISE INC 12/15/23 418.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410498 58068 EMPHASYS SOFTWARE 12/15/23 12,400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410499 G1DEFIESTA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPA 12/15/23 977.56 MW IS AP CHK 00410500 49988 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR CANAD 12/15/23 239.06 MW IS AP CHK 00410501 56287 EPLUS TECHNOLOGY INC 12/15/23 183.71 MW IS AP CHK 00410502 56435 ESO SOLUTIONS INC 12/15/23 667.58 MW IS AP CHK 00410503 36077 FASTENAL COMPANY 12/15/23 695.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410504 55643 FLORIAN INDUSTRIES INC 12/15/23 3,714.50 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 6 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410505 11813 FOLGER GRAPHICS 12/15/23 214.26 MW IS AP CHK 00410506 57350 FREYER & LAURETA INC 12/15/23 14,424.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410507 56170 GAVIN'S PAINTING 12/15/23 10,506.28 MW IS AP CHK 00410508 4581 GOLDEN BAY CONSTRUCTION INC 12/15/23 227,634.97 MW IS AP CHK 00410509 55311 GOLDEN STATE EMERGENCY 12/15/23 539.49 MW IS AP CHK 00410510 55945 GOVINVEST INC 12/15/23 13,650.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410511 1754 GRAINGER INC 12/15/23 18,648.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410512 36985 GRAND INDUSTRIES INC 12/15/23 39,800.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410513 56292 GRANICUS LLC 12/15/23 9,464.84 MW IS AP CHK 00410514 1571 GRANITEROCK 12/15/23 1,475.49 MW IS AP CHK 00410515 37554R GREGORIO, JOYCE 12/15/23 236.12 MW IS AP CHK 00410516 56252 GRISWOLD INDUSTRIES 12/15/23 44,715.34 MW IS AP CHK 00410517 30894 GRM 12/15/23 30.95 MW IS
AP CHK 00410518 54101 H & R PLUMBING AND DRAIN CL 12/15/23 2,800.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410519 2223 HACH COMPANY 12/15/23 3,508.93 MW IS AP CHK 00410520 57302 HALEY AND ALDRICH INC 12/15/23 5,370.33 MW IS AP CHK 00410521 27846R HAMILTON, JASON 12/15/23 5,416.36 MW IS AP CHK 00410522 57852 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON 12/15/23 18,916.94 MW IS AP CHK 00410523 3702 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLAST 12/15/23 334.48 MW IS AP CHK 00410524 55667 HAZEN AND SAWYER 12/15/23 39,845.90 MW IS AP CHK 00410525 36841 HEART OF SAN MATEO COUNTY 12/15/23 32,642.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410526 58074R HERNANDEZ'S CRAFTSMAN CONST 12/15/23 1,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410527 17021 HF&H CONSULTANTS LLC 12/15/23 5,100.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410528 9049 HI TECH EVS INC 12/15/23 9,671.61 MW IS AP CHK 00410529 49700 HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL CO 12/15/23 6,293.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410530 15857 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 12/15/23 11,022.81 MW IS AP CHK 00410531 40241R HUBER, LARRY 12/15/23 250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410532 41818 HUNTINGTON COURT REPORTERS 12/15/23 705.02 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 7 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410533 57840 INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAL CO IN 12/15/23 157.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410534 48933 INFOSEND INC 12/15/23 6,278.49 MW IS AP CHK 00410535 57693 INTERACTIVE RESOURCES INC 12/15/23 35,937.65 MW IS AP CHK 00410536 5560 INTERSTATE GRADING & PAVING 12/15/23 740,088.53 MW IS AP CHK 00410537 56564 INVOICE CLOUD INC 12/15/23 100.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410538 24233 JACOBS ASSOCIATES 12/15/23 89,246.92 MW IS AP CHK 00410539 26328 JAM SERVICES INC 12/15/23 93.81 MW IS AP CHK 00410540 55027 JOHN THE SIGN GUY LLC 12/15/23 3,859.73 MW IS AP CHK 00410541 25311 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY S 12/15/23 516.60 MW IS AP CHK 00410542 37856R JOHNSON, EVELYN 12/15/23 2,811.38 MW IS AP CHK 00410543 55889 JONES HALL 12/15/23 4,950.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410544 57096 JONES, CLEITUS 12/15/23 3,016.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410545 55898R JRG ROOFING INC 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410546 11281 JWC ENVIRONMENTAL INC 12/15/23 3,857.19 MW IS AP CHK 00410547 21383R KALAVERAS, MARJORIE 12/15/23 769.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410548 29633 KELLY MOORE PAINT COMPANY I 12/15/23 31.62 MW IS AP CHK 00410549 56294 KELLY SPICERS FACILITIES SO 12/15/23 3,670.65 MW IS AP CHK 00410550 21792 KELLY SPICERS STORES 12/15/23 1,275.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410551 20073 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES IN 12/15/23 1,210.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410552 51402R KLATT, JOHN 12/15/23 52.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410553 31870R KRAUSS, GREGORY 12/15/23 101.03 MW IS AP CHK 00410554 58077R KYAUK, EDGAR & LILLIAN 12/15/23 344.05 MW IS AP CHK 00410555 1108 L N CURTIS AND SONS 12/15/23 29,468.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410556 13776 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 12/15/23 1,778.48 MW IS AP CHK 00410557 40871R LEE FAMILY CORPORATION 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410558 33497 LEGACY MECHANICAL & ENERGY 12/15/23 3,140.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410559 29200 LEGAL SHIELD 12/15/23 400.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410560 45083 LEHR 12/15/23 12,133.99 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 8 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410561 37094 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGE 12/15/23 510.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410562 56842R LIFETIME ROOFING RENOVATION 12/15/23 418.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410563 16440 LINDE GAS & EQUIPMENT INC 12/15/23 256.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410564 14431 LINDE INC 12/15/23 13,744.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410565 29332 LORAL LANDSCAPING 12/15/23 4,316.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410566 58090R LUCAS, VIRAY JONA AVIGAIL 12/15/23 250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410567 53573R M L S BUILDER INC 12/15/23 500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410568 52155R MACHU PICCHU ROOFING INC 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410569 26737R MAGNO, ALIWELYN 12/15/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410570 58083R MCCARTHY, KEVIN 12/15/23 100.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410571 15393 MCMASTER-CARR 12/15/23 941.72 MW IS AP CHK 00410572 58081R MEDINA, WILLIAM 12/15/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410573 23949 METRO MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS 12/15/23 1,800.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410574 22863 MIDWEST TAPE INC 12/15/23 1,815.26 MW IS AP CHK 00410575 40379R MIKE PH CONSTRUCTION CO 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410576 49436REN MKD CEDAR HILL LLC 12/15/23 7,376.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410577 58086R MO, BOHENG 12/15/23 4,667.48 MW IS AP CHK 00410578 16115 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 12/15/23 3,013.04 MW IS AP CHK 00410579 15210 MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP 12/15/23 1,512.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410580 45221R NEW HIGH PROTECTION ROOFING 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410581 56820 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/15/23 221.77 MW IS AP CHK 00410582 56821 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/15/23 203.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410583 56822 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/15/23 2,123.90 MW IS AP CHK 00410584 56335 OPERATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVI 12/15/23 57,360.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410585 34228 ORLANDI TRAILER INC 12/15/23 624.68 MW IS AP CHK 00410586 3685 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 12/15/23 1,573.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410587 4918 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 12/15/23 200.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410588 55555 OVERDRIVE INC 12/15/23 935.77 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 9 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410589 42838 PACE SUPPLY CORP 12/15/23 866.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410590 49111 PACIFIC BAY EQUIPMENT 12/15/23 235.85 MW IS AP CHK 00410591 15483 PACIFIC COAST SEED INC 12/15/23 2,849.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410592 32927 PACIFIC FIRE SAFE FIRE EXTI 12/15/23 724.18 MW IS AP CHK 00410593 1216 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 12/15/23 217,609.09 MW IS AP CHK 00410594 29252 PACIFIC PRODUCE INC 12/15/23 3,295.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410595 50620 PARK ENGINEERING INC 12/15/23 111,830.18 MW IS AP CHK 00410596 56663 PARTS AUTHORITY LLC 12/15/23 4,009.08 MW IS AP CHK 00410597 53495 PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC 12/15/23 1,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410598 3297 PENINSULA LIBRARY SYSTEM 12/15/23 89.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410599 10255MED PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP IN 12/15/23 3,482.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410600 19678 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 12/15/23 175.55 MW IS AP CHK 00410601 47044 PETERSON TRUCKS INC 12/15/23 231.64 MW IS AP CHK 00410602 58078R PHORNTHIP KORKIATNUN & ITTI 12/15/23 3,823.87 MW IS AP CHK 00410603 54331 PIIAN SYSTEMS LLC 12/15/23 7,409.52 MW IS AP CHK 00410604 49027 PLACEWORKS INC 12/15/23 16,495.16 MW IS AP CHK 00410605 57003 PLANTE & MORAN PLLC 12/15/23 6,050.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410606 54759 POLICE STRATEGIES LLC 12/15/23 7,500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410607 36106 POLYDYNE INC 12/15/23 41,074.37 MW IS AP CHK 00410608 33715 PRISM 12/15/23 39,955.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410609 2364 PROJECT SENTINEL 12/15/23 2,789.40 MW IS AP CHK 00410610 14449 R & S ERECTION OF SAN MATEO 12/15/23 3,668.57 MW IS AP CHK 00410611 48668JPA RAVNTECH CORPORATION 12/15/23 15,498.23 MW IS AP CHK 00410612 50803 READYREFRESH 12/15/23 95.91 MW IS AP CHK 00410613 1687 RED WING SHOES 12/15/23 700.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410614 14608 REEVES COMPANY INC 12/15/23 126.81 MW IS AP CHK 00410615 56273R RELIABLE ROOFING & RETRO-FI 12/15/23 836.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410616 1200 REPUBLIC SERVICES OF NORTH 12/15/23 1,657,949.58 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 10 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410617 46300R RESCUE ROOFING COMPANY 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410618 58039 RNS COMMUNICATIONS INC 12/15/23 9,975.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410619 57922 ROADSAFE TRAFFIC SYSTEMS IN 12/15/23 315.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410620 53532 ROBERT HALF 12/15/23 2,688.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410621 1087 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 12/15/23 30.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410622 53427 SAGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS I 12/15/23 10,536.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410623 38342R SAKKAL, NATALIE 12/15/23 143.88 MW IS AP CHK 00410624 58082R SALHA, MOHAMMAD OMAR 12/15/23 554.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410625 51614 SAN MATEO CART SERVICE 12/15/23 750.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410626 12544 SAN MATEO COUNTY CONTROLLER 12/15/23 69,115.60 MW IS AP CHK 00410627 35246 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS O 12/15/23 12,967.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410628 G1MARTINEZ SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF 12/15/23 112.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410629 1790 SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DI 12/15/23 23,734.52 MW IS AP CHK 00410630 9666 SAN MATEO LAWN MOWER SHOP 12/15/23 3,158.65 MW IS AP CHK 00410631 57658 SAN MATEO RESOURCE CONSERVA 12/15/23 9,204.87 MW IS AP CHK 00410632 55607 SANTANA, BRUNO 12/15/23 3,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410633 54717 SANTANA, VALERIA CRISTINA 12/15/23 11,800.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410634 58076R SANTIAGO, BERNARD G 12/15/23 157.28 MW IS AP CHK 00410635 28343R SANTIAGO, MARIA ANICIA 12/15/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410636 57596 SAP AMERICA INC 12/15/23 573.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410637 8446 SBMHCP TRUST FUND 12/15/23 63.09 MW IS AP CHK 00410638 56750 SCL-NORTH 12/15/23 5,438.81 MW IS AP CHK 00410639 37037 SCOTT MACHINE DEVELOPMENT C 12/15/23 53.13 MW IS AP CHK 00410640 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 270,549.98 MW IS AP CHK 00410641 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 316.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410642 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 51,003.52 MW IS AP CHK 00410643 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 1,875.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410644 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 40,038.61 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 11 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410645 1111 SF - WATER 12/15/23 38,237.52 MW IS AP CHK 00410646 23742 SHOE DEPOT INC 12/15/23 324.69 MW IS AP CHK 00410647 49695 SHRED IT USA 12/15/23 190.03 MW IS AP CHK 00410648 52666 SHRED WORKS INC 12/15/23 207.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410649 57928R SIMALEAVICH, DAVID J 12/15/23 500.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410650 51449 SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER IN 12/15/23 982.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410651 32237 SMART & FINAL STORES LLC 12/15/23 891.05 MW IS AP CHK 00410652 18862R SMELLY MELS PLUMBING INC 12/15/23 3,274.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410653 2055 SOUTH CITY LUMBER & SUPPLY 12/15/23 413.06 MW IS AP CHK 00410654 55808 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANT 12/15/23 5,245.67 MW IS AP CHK 00410655 37940 STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY CO 12/15/23 46.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410656 6352 STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 12/15/23 510.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410657 9339 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTR 12/15/23 44,169.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410658 9339 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTR 12/15/23 3,576.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410659 27810 STEWART CHEVY CAD CHRY JEEP 12/15/23 76.61 MW IS AP CHK 00410660 34747 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT & CONS 12/15/23 20,668.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410661 12617 SYNCOAT 12/15/23 3,850.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410662 45319 T MOBILE USA INC 12/15/23 100.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410663 15590 T SHIRT FEVER 12/15/23 7,648.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410664 58075R TAN, MARIBEL 12/15/23 640.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410665 37535 TELEPATH CORPORATION 12/15/23 358.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410666 51891 TETRA TECH INC 12/15/23 2,119.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410667 53452 THATCHER COMPANY OF CALIFOR 12/15/23 44,748.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410668 49543 TRB AND ASSOCIATES INC 12/15/23 1,187.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410669 53970 TRIDENT K9 CONSULTING 12/15/23 1,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410670 52033 TRIPEPI SMITH & ASSOCIATES 12/15/23 1,845.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410671 58084R TU, KENNY 12/15/23 1,679.45 MW IS AP CHK 00410672 26803 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS INC 12/15/23 19,049.08 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 12 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410673 57186 TURNER ADVISEMENT LLC 12/15/23 4,725.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410674 37637 ULINE INC 12/15/23 857.63 MW IS
AP CHK 00410675 56630 UNDERGROUND REPUBLIC WATER 12/15/23 2,037.18 MW IS AP CHK 00410676 32209 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 12/15/23 6,312.89 MW IS AP CHK 00410677 7873 URBAN FARMER STORE, THE 12/15/23 306.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410678 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 141.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410679 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 3,462.92 MW IS AP CHK 00410680 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 42.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410681 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 85.11 MW IS AP CHK 00410682 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 179.01 MW IS AP CHK 00410683 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 47.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410684 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 47.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410685 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 188.40 MW IS AP CHK 00410686 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 3,268.10 MW IS AP CHK 00410687 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 499.75 MW IS AP CHK 00410688 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 304.43 MW IS AP CHK 00410689 29329 VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES L 12/15/23 2,890.57 MW IS AP CHK 00410690 41056R VIOLA, ANNA MARIE 12/15/23 769.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410691 57426 VOLER STRATEGIC ADVISORS IN 12/15/23 10,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410692 1579 VWR INTERNATIONAL LLC 12/15/23 844.84 MW IS AP CHK 00410693 50485 WAVE BROADBAND 12/15/23 95.95 MW IS AP CHK 00410694 50485 WAVE BROADBAND 12/15/23 1,079.95 MW IS AP CHK 00410695 50485 WAVE BROADBAND 12/15/23 1,295.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410696 50485 WAVE BROADBAND 12/15/23 243.51 MW IS AP CHK 00410697 46961 WEAVER, JOHN 12/15/23 250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410698 49085 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 12/15/23 2,970.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410699 1095 WESTLAKE ECO SOFT-TOUCH 12/15/23 955.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410700 30684 WHITE CAP LP 12/15/23 811.10 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/14/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 13 THU, DEC 14, 2023, 12:25 PM --req: HFE-------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1176285 J492-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410701 56711 WILLIAM K FAISST CONSULTING 12/15/23 8,679.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410702 54330 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC 12/15/23 763.19 MW IS AP CHK 00410703 36417R WILLIAMS, ANNE 12/15/23 721.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410704 25139 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP 12/15/23 42.13 MW IS AP CHK 00410705 58080R WONG, VERNON 12/15/23 184.41 MW IS AP CHK 00410706 53426 WRECO 12/15/23 22,770.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410707 56850R YIP, WANDA 12/15/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410708 58088R YOUNG, JESSICA 12/15/23 1,028.99 MW IS AP CHK 00410709 12694R ZALINSKIS, KLAUS 12/15/23 721.54 MW IS AP CHK 00410710 53784R ZHEN, JIAN LIN 12/15/23 1,244.12 MW IS AP CHK 00410711 55902 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS I 12/15/23 629.58 MW IS G R A N D T O T A L S:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 5,246,097.97 Number of Checks Processed: 347 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total EFTs 0.00 Number of EFTs Processed: 0
Total EPAYs 0.00 Number of EPAYs Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 5,246,097.97
City of Daly City 12/20/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 1 WED, DEC 20, 2023, 11:37 AM --req: CLEE------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1177915 J114-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410712 58107R AKERS, JAMES 12/21/23 17,700.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410713 14004 ALERT PEST CONTROL COMPANY 12/21/23 3,817.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410714 49642 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICE 12/21/23 8,232.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410715 37095 ALL INDUSTRIAL ELECTRIC SUP 12/21/23 163.30 MW IS AP CHK 00410716 39657 ALL STAR GLASS 12/21/23 672.47 MW IS AP CHK 00410717 42310 AMERINAT 12/21/23 326.70 MW IS
AP CHK 00410718 24868 ANIXTER INC 12/21/23 984.58 MW IS AP CHK 00410719 46585 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 12/21/23 110.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410720 46585 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 12/21/23 122.90 MW IS AP CHK 00410721 32577 AT&T 12/21/23 7,379.37 MW IS
AP CHK 00410722 32577 AT&T 12/21/23 362.21 MW IS
AP CHK 00410723 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/21/23 1,327.92 MW IS AP CHK 00410724 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/21/23 4,835.49 MW IS AP CHK 00410725 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/21/23 603.60 MW IS AP CHK 00410726 6413 AT&T MOBILITY 12/21/23 2,333.92 MW IS AP CHK 00410727 29643 AUTO COLLISION CENTER 12/21/23 11,800.03 MW IS AP CHK 00410728 53260 AXON ENTERPRISE INC 12/21/23 73,691.57 MW IS AP CHK 00410729 1232 BAKER & TAYLOR COMPANY INC 12/21/23 9,822.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410730 58097R BAKER, JESSICA 12/21/23 281.24 MW IS AP CHK 00410731 8796 BAY CITY BOILER 12/21/23 7,142.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410732 48115 BAYSHORE TRANSMISSIONS 12/21/23 4,129.55 MW IS AP CHK 00410733 19200 BIRITE FOODSERVICE DISTRIBU 12/21/23 6,305.78 MW IS AP CHK 00410734 3349 BROADMOOR LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 12/21/23 1,508.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410735 33981 CAGWIN & DORWARD 12/21/23 377.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410736 36927 CALCON SYSTEMS INC 12/21/23 11,550.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410737 1196 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 12/21/23 36.89 MW IS AP CHK 00410738 1196 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 12/21/23 147.06 MW IS AP CHK 00410739 58103R CAMICIA, MICHELLE 12/21/23 3,877.17 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/20/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 2 WED, DEC 20, 2023, 11:37 AM --req: CLEE------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1177915 J114-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410740 28636 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 12/21/23 68,268.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410741 31956 CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FOR 12/21/23 1,658.46 MW IS AP CHK 00410742 54918R CFY CONSTRUCTION INC 12/21/23 418.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410743 33064R CHAN, ADA 12/21/23 620.34 MW IS
AP CHK 00410744 55100R CHOW, GILLIAN 12/21/23 186.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410745 51204 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/21/23 494.79 MW IS AP CHK 00410746 3678 CINTAS CORPORATION #464 12/21/23 3,010.90 MW IS AP CHK 00410747 25602 CITY OF DALY CITY 12/21/23 3,605.07 MW IS AP CHK 00410748 20689 COIT SERVICES INC 12/21/23 750.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410749 42205 COLMA FIREMEN'S SOCIAL CLUB 12/21/23 180.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410750 12578 COMPLETE LINEN SERVICES INC 12/21/23 140.36 MW IS AP CHK 00410751 14930 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 12/21/23 246.76 MW IS AP CHK 00410752 17561 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 12/21/23 593,445.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410753 23257 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 12/21/23 61,049.91 MW IS AP CHK 00410754 43157JPA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 12/21/23 1,781.84 MW IS AP CHK 00410755 48323 CRYSTAL CREAMERY 12/21/23 332.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410756 49483 CSCDA 12/21/23 3,657.75 MW IS
AP CHK 00410757 53761 CT WEST 12/21/23 3,000.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410758 19907 CWEA-TCP 12/21/23 113.00 MW IS
AP CHK 00410759 1836 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION 12/21/23 589.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410760 2285 DALY CITY COLMA CHAMBER OF 12/21/23 15,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410761 1793 DALY CITY TOOL MART 12/21/23 102.57 MW IS AP CHK 00410762 47533 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RE 12/21/23 98,793.16 MW IS AP CHK 00410763 57870 DUNNIGAN PSYCHOLOGICAL & TH 12/21/23 625.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410764 14573R E J BUILDERS 12/21/23 659.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410765 48177 EAST BAY TIRE CO 12/21/23 1,375.29 MW IS AP CHK 00410766 56187 ELLIS INVESTIGATIONS LAW CO 12/21/23 9,625.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410767 19787 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICE 12/21/23 710.58 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/20/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 3 WED, DEC 20, 2023, 11:37 AM --req: CLEE------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1177915 J114-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410768 56170 GAVIN'S PAINTING 12/21/23 5,880.64 MW IS AP CHK 00410769 48247 GCS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT 12/21/23 340.79 MW IS AP CHK 00410770 1754 GRAINGER INC 12/21/23 1,308.89 MW IS AP CHK 00410771 19293 GYM DOCTORS 12/21/23 764.40 MW IS AP CHK 00410772 42304R HARGENS INC 12/21/23 1,065.17 MW IS AP CHK 00410773 54590 HOME DEPOT PRO, THE 12/21/23 1,823.36 MW IS AP CHK 00410774 56109 HONEY BUCKET 12/21/23 977.79 MW IS AP CHK 00410775 58094R HUANG, STANLEY 12/21/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410776 57924 IMPERIAL SUPPLIES LLC 12/21/23 41.33 MW IS AP CHK 00410777 38914 J P COOKE COMPANY 12/21/23 120.90 MW IS AP CHK 00410778 27808 JAMES FORD INC 12/21/23 62,571.41 MW IS AP CHK 00410779 47002MED KAISER PERMANENTE 12/21/23 3,392.18 MW IS AP CHK 00410780 22450 KAPCO 12/21/23 819.06 MW IS
AP CHK 00410781 56294 KELLY SPICERS FACILITIES SO 12/21/23 719.13 MW IS AP CHK 00410782 1108 L N CURTIS AND SONS 12/21/23 121,961.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410783 14431 LINDE INC 12/21/23 6,935.84 MW IS AP CHK 00410784 58102R LOVE, TOMMY D & ARES MORA 12/21/23 4,109.59 MW IS AP CHK 00410785 58096R LU, JIE 12/21/23 24.99 MW IS
AP CHK 00410786 14277 MAZE & ASSOCIATES INC 12/21/23 8,550.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410787 58098R MOH, THON 12/21/23 2,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410788 16115 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 12/21/23 2,895.53 MW IS AP CHK 00410789 1050 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC 12/21/23 24,888.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410790 57880R MP ROOFING 12/21/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410791 58040 NATIONAL BEDDING COMPANY LL 12/21/23 39,035.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410792 58100R NG, CHRISTINA 12/21/23 1,995.91 MW IS AP CHK 00410793 25761 NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC 12/21/23 179.56 MW IS AP CHK 00410794 56821 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/21/23 234.83 MW IS AP CHK 00410795 56822 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 12/21/23 1,216.37 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/20/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 4 WED, DEC 20, 2023, 11:37 AM --req: CLEE------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1177915 J114-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410796 56335 OPERATIONAL TECHNICAL SERVI 12/21/23 20,440.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410797 3685 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY 12/21/23 1,957.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410798 1216 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 12/21/23 310,721.43 MW IS AP CHK 00410799 29252 PACIFIC PRODUCE INC 12/21/23 824.55 MW IS AP CHK 00410800 50620 PARK ENGINEERING INC 12/21/23 48,581.61 MW IS AP CHK 00410801 19627 PARKSON CORPORATION 12/21/23 11,049.67 MW IS AP CHK 00410802 58101R PENINSULA ROOFING 12/21/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410803 29738 PENINSULA UNIFORMS & EQUIPM 12/21/23 2,515.08 MW IS AP CHK 00410804 54331 PIIAN SYSTEMS LLC 12/21/23 7,409.42 MW IS AP CHK 00410805 36106 POLYDYNE INC 12/21/23 27,464.29 MW IS AP CHK 00410806 48668JPA RAVNTECH CORPORATION 12/21/23 556.71 MW IS AP CHK 00410807 55298 RDO EQUIPMENT CO 12/21/23 1,552.91 MW IS AP CHK 00410808 57786 RK ENGINEERING INC 12/21/23 268,891.80 MW IS AP CHK 00410809 58099R RODRIQUEZ, JON MICHAEL 12/21/23 209.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410810 1087 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 12/21/23 430.21 MW IS AP CHK 00410811 53427 SAGE CONSULTING ENGINEERS I 12/21/23 4,440.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410812 1643 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMEN 12/21/23 1,648.20 MW IS AP CHK 00410813 15749 SANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE 12/21/23 65.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410814 41081R SCOLES, GREGORY 12/21/23 250.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410815 52666 SHRED WORKS INC 12/21/23 46.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410816 55808 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANT 12/21/23 368.43 MW IS AP CHK 00410817 46351 SPECIAL SERVICES GROUP LLC 12/21/23 1,229.58 MW IS AP CHK 00410818 20534 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC INC 12/21/23 6,400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410819 58104R STA MARIA, KAYLA 12/21/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410820 9339 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTR 12/21/23 26,552.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410821 56958JPA STEPFORD 12/21/23 9,275.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410822 45084 STEPFORD INC 12/21/23 87.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410823 57023RJPA STRATTON, MARGARET 12/21/23 157.40 MW IS
City of Daly City 12/20/23 [BANK RECON REGISTER] BK REGISTER Page 5 WED, DEC 20, 2023, 11:37 AM --req: CLEE------leg: GL JL--loc: ONSITE----job:1177915 J114-----prog: BK200 <1.54>--report id: CKREG--- Document Payee ID Payee Name Date Amount Type Stat Rel To Note ================== ============ =========================== ======== ============= ==== ==== ====== ================================ AP CHK 00410824 34747 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT & CONS 12/21/23 18,858.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410825 29237 SYNAGRO WEST LLC 12/21/23 36,901.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410826 15590 T SHIRT FEVER 12/21/23 2,757.34 MW IS AP CHK 00410827 58106R TAKAYAMA, CYNTHIA 12/21/23 11,000.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410828 58048R TAMASESE, MOEGAGOGO 12/21/23 400.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410829 13852 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER 12/21/23 3,024.50 MW IS AP CHK 00410830 42970JPA TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEER 12/21/23 15,378.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410831 26803 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS INC 12/21/23 1,922.81 MW IS AP CHK 00410832 37637 ULINE INC 12/21/23 772.72 MW IS
AP CHK 00410833 57303 UNIFIED POWER 12/21/23 4,785.45 MW IS AP CHK 00410834 32209 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC 12/21/23 9,813.16 MW IS AP CHK 00410835 41809 VESTRA RESOURCES INC 12/21/23 687.25 MW IS AP CHK 00410836 36355 WASTEWATER SOLUTIONS INC 12/21/23 4,125.00 MW IS AP CHK 00410837 55677 WESTERN EXTRICATION SPECIAL 12/21/23 2,535.66 MW IS AP CHK 00410838 1095 WESTLAKE ECO SOFT-TOUCH 12/21/23 722.70 MW IS AP CHK 00410839 30684 WHITE CAP LP 12/21/23 555.83 MW IS AP CHK 00410840 17364 WORLD BOOK INC 12/21/23 1,251.53 MW IS AP CHK 00410841 58095R YEH, THEODORE 12/21/23 447.92 MW IS G R A N D T O T A L S:
Total Void Machine Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Void Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0 Total Machine Written 2,214,023.46 Number of Checks Processed: 130 Total Hand Written 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Reversals 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total Cancelled 0.00 Number of Checks Processed: 0
Total EFTs 0.00 Number of EFTs Processed: 0
Total EPAYs 0.00 Number of EPAYs Processed: 0
G R A N D T O T A L 2,214,023.46
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Resolution Admonishing Councilmember DiGiovanni Recommended Action Consider the City Council resolution admonishing Councilmember DiGiovanni for certain findings made in the investigation report pursuant to a complaint filed by City Manager Thomas Piccolotti dated March 3, 2023.
Background
By a memo to the City Council dated March 3, 2023, the City Manager described recent and repeated acts of unprofessional conduct by Councilmember DiGiovanni experienced by the City Manager and City staff. A copy of the memo is available upon request from the City Clerk. (See Attachment). In the memo, the City Manager alleged abuse, harassment and bullying by Councilmember DiGiovanni against him and City staff.
Upon receipt of the complaint and review by the Ethics Committee, the Human Resources Department retained an independent investigator, Ellis Investigations Corporation, to investigate Councilmember DiGiovanni’s alleged acts of abuse, harassment and bullying. The investigation commenced April 7, 2023. The investigator reported its findings on the twenty-one issues to the City Council Ethics Committee, which were subsequently shared in redacted form to protect the confidentiality of witnesses, most of whom were City staff, with the City Council and Councilmember DiGiovanni.
During the course of the investigation, Councilmember DiGiovanni was provided the opportunity to respond to the allegations through a request from the investigator to meet with and interview Councilmember DiGiovanni. Councilmember DiGiovanni refused to participate in the investigation.
Upon completion of the investigation report, and after the Ethics Committee’s review, the redacted version of the report was shared with the City Council in closed session, because it was prepared under the context of significant exposure to litigation, since it contained alleged acts of abuse by Councilmember DiGiovanni against the City Manager and staff, and claims that Councilmember DiGiovanni created a hostile work environment for the City Manager and City staff. Upon several meetings and direction of the City Council, Councilmember DiGiovanni reviewed the report and afforded the opportunity to meet and confer with the City Council in closed session to address the findings of the report. City Councilmember DiGiovanni chose not to respond or comment to the report.
Based on the thorough investigation of the allegations, including interviews of all witnesses the investigator deemed relevant, the investigator addressed each of the allegations and issues raised, and made findings.
During subsequent Council closed sessions to address the issues raised by the complaint and the investigation report’s findings, the City Council took action in closed session to waive the confidentiality of the redacted report in accordance with Cal. Govt. Code Sec. 54963(a). The City Council also directed the City Attorney to prepare the associated resolution for a Council presentation.
City Council Agenda Report
Subject: Resolution Admonishing Councilmember DiGiovanni Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Discussion and Council Determination
If the resolution is adopted by a majority of the City Council, then the Council admonishes Councilmember DiGiovanni based on five of the twenty-one findings from the independent investigator’s report:
1. Councilmember DiGiovanni used City vehicles for personal purposes that violated City policy on personal use of City vehicles 5/08;
2. Councilmember DiGiovanni kept City vehicles for extended periods in violation of the City policy on personal use of City vehicles 5/08;
3. Councilmember DiGiovanni used City vehicles for political campaign purposes;
4. Improperly demanded police officers and staff to remove patrols from City events in violation of Daly City Municipal Code Sections 2.02.080 and 2.02.090; and
5. Treated City staff unprofessionally and in a hostile manner.
If the resolution is adopted, the Council also urges Councilmember DiGiovanni to apologize to the City Manager and City staff (as a whole) for her unprofessional and hostile behavior, and to attend proper workplace behavior training.
Summary/Conclusion:
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Rose Zimmerman
City Attorney
Attachment
Memo from City Manager
Draft Resolution
UPDATED DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
ADMONISHING COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA DIGIOVANNI
WHEREAS, on or about March 3, 2023, the City Manager sent a memo to the City Council describing recent and repeated acts of unprofessional conduct by Councilmember DiGiovanni experienced by the City Manager and City staff. A copy of the memo is available upon request from the City Clerk. In the memo, the City Manager alleged abuse, harassment and bullying by Councilmember DiGiovanni against him and City staff; and WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Council take all complaints of alleged illegal or inappropriate behavior against or among City staff and the City Council seriously. To that end, upon receipt of the complaint, the Human Resources Department retained an independent investigator, Ellis Investigations Corporation, to investigate the alleged acts of abuse, harassment and bullying by Councilmember DiGiovanni. The investigation commenced April 7, 2023. The investigator reported its findings to the City Council Ethics Committee, which were subsequently shared in redacted form to protect the confidentiality of witnesses most of whom were City staff, with the City Council and Councilmember DiGiovanni; and WHEREAS, the Investigation Report found that Councilmember DiGiovanni engaged in twenty-one (21) acts of abuse, harassment and bullying of City staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council identified five (5) major violations that created a hostile work environment by Councilmember DiGiovanni; and
WHEREAS, Councilmember DiGiovanni was provided the opportunity to respond to the allegations through a request from the investigator to meet with and interview Councilmember DiGiovanni, which Councilmember DiGiovanni refused; and WHEREAS, based on the thorough investigation of the allegations, including interviews of all witnesses the investigator deemed relevant, the investigator addressed each of the allegations and issues raised, and made findings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Daly City that it does hereby rely upon and sustains the following findings of the independent investigator’s report, a redacted copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, that Councilmember DiGiovanni:
1. Kept City vehicles for extended periods in violation of the City policy on personal use of City vehicles;
2. Used City vehicles for personal purposes in violation of the City policy on personal use of City vehicles;
3. Used City vehicles for political campaigns purposes;
4. Improperly demanded police officers and staff to remove patrols from City events; and
5. Treated City staff unprofessionally and in a hostile manner.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Daly City that:
1. The City Council admonishes Councilmember DiGiovanni based on the findings above, and for her unprofessional and hostile behavior towards the City Manager and City staff; and
2. The City Council urges Councilmember DiGiovanni to apologize to the City Manager and City staff (as a whole) through virtual platforms, or at a City Council meeting, for treating City staff unprofessionally and in a hostile manner; and
3. The City Council urges Councilmember DiGiovanni to attend anger management in the workplace training and related behavior training in order to treat City staff professionally and
4. The City Council finds that should such behavior continue, the City Council has the right to issue a formal censorship of Councilmember DiGiovanni based upon the findings in the August 15, 2023 Investigation Report.
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of Daly City, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2024, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
APPROVED:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY
CITY OF DALY CITY INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 3, 2023
TO: Mayor Ray Buenaventura
Vice-Mayor Juslyn Manalo
Councilmember Dr. Rod Daus-Magbual
Councilmember Pamela DiGiovanni
Councilmember Glenn Sylvester
FROM: Thomas J. Piccolotti, City Manager
CC: Rose Zimmerman, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Council Communication
Dear Mayor, Vice-Mayor, and Councilmembers,
This memorandum is in response to recent and repeated acts of unprofessional conduct by Councilmember DiGiovanni experienced by myself and City staff, not limited to the City Manager’s Office. I will describe the most recent events that precipitated this memorandum but unfortunately there are other similar instances of abuse, harassment, and bullying.
On Thursday March 2, 2023, at approximately 1:00pm, Councilmember DiGiovanni came to City Hall and instructed my staff to set her up in the Gateway Garden for a Zoom Meeting. During her interaction with staff, she went into several of what I believe to be inappropriate and unprofessional topics:
• One being that she stated to staff that Supervisor Canepa does not represent Daly City therefore the City Manager should not be allowing him to use the Gateway office on Fridays to meet with residents. She believed it to be a misuse of City Resources. • She inappropriately made statements about politics stating to my staff that she is going to run a certain individual from Bayshore to get the majority back and “change is coming”. She specified an individual who won’t be named in this correspondence. • She then chose to denigrate me with false statements to my staff regarding an incident she caused at the Walkabout on Friday February 17.
• She also stated to a staff member that “I am going to take Tom down.” The staff member that communicated this incident to me was not comfortable responding or asking her to stop because she might focus her ire their direction. This staff member was also concerned about asking her to stop because she is elected and has stated multiple times that she has authority over City staff. A similar concern or discomfort of talking to Councilmember DiGiovanni and asking her to stop has been conveyed to me by other employees of the City at other times over the last six months.
Unfortunately, like the incident discussed above, a repeated pattern of Councilmember DiGiovanni’s interaction with my staff, while it may start with a legitimate business item, she usually turns it into a derogatory conversation regarding Council, myself, and my ability to do my job. I know this because my staff has reported it to me on several occasions. I have always maintained a professional demeaner with Councilmember DiGiovanni and it is my duty to assist all the Councilmembers and carry out the vision and actions of the Council as it is legislated. It is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain that professionalism when Councilmember DiGiovanni is chastising and disparaging me to my staff. It puts me and my staff in an uncomfortable position and inhibits our ability to effectively perform City business.
I will provide greater detail on the other two incidents referenced above. On Friday February 17, 2023, at the Walkabout event, Councilmember DiGiovanni approached me in a hostile manner making physical contact with me by putting her hand/finger on my arms/shoulder and told me I need to protect her because Cheryl Catuar was there, was stalking her, and we didn’t have enough police protection. My
response was, “Pam this is a positive event, I was invited here and nobody is going to hurt anybody.” Her response to me in an angry tone and in front of witnesses was to repeat “I am your boss” several times and that, “it’s your job to protect me”. She went on to repeatedly say in front of witnesses that I am “biased”. She also referenced the previous day where I was a guest at the HART re-opening at Larcombe Clubhouse where my only interaction with her was “Hello Pam”, but she referenced that interaction as “everyone at the HART event saw what you did to me”. All of this took place while I was trying to walk up front as I was asked to talk to the people present by the Chamber of Commerce. I was shaken as I had to speak to the group. Additionally, contrary to her claim that Cheryl Catuar was stalking her, Daly City’s Acting Police Chief Cameron Christensen who was also invited to the event, conveyed to me that he observed Councilmember DiGiovanni following and “stalking” Ms. Catuar for approximately 45 minutes. After Councilmember DiGiovanni chastised me in front of approximately 100 people regarding my duty to protect her she went to Acting Police Chief Christensen and began to denigrate me as biased and incapable of doing my job.
The second comment referenced above is a continuation of a conversation I had in January with Councilmember DiGiovanni. She questioned why Supervisor Canepa and his staff were at City Hall. I explained that as the Supervisor of District 5 and like many past Supervisors like William Schumacher, Mike Nevin, Adrienne Tissier, and David Canepa, I am allowing the Supervisor to meet with constituents, so they do not have to drive all the way to Redwood City to meet with him. She claimed to me then that Supervisor Canepa does not represent Daly City but that he only represents unincorporated Broadmoor.
Yesterday, as referenced above, she repeated that false claim to my staff.
These types of interactions with City Staff and myself was the reason for my September 28th memorandum to Council. I have several documented instances of Councilmember DiGiovanni’s inappropriate interactions with staff and myself that I am happy to share in the appropriate forum.
Another concerning interaction with staff was when a staff person texted Councilmember DiGiovanni asking if she accidentally removed a certificate from the City Manager’s Office, and she responded by calling the staff person and berating them and denying it. Her bullying actions over time have created a hostile work environment for myself and City staff. These actions, which she is attempting to normalize, are part of an ongoing pattern of harassment, bullying, and hostile work environment. At the present time I am careful and hesitant to talk with Councilmember DiGiovanni without a witness. I want everything on record as I am concerned I will be accused of false claims.
I was hopeful that as I embarked and accepted the challenge as City Manager I would have the support of the full Council but it is apparent that Councilmember DiGiovanni is undermining my ability to do my job. Her disdain toward me has been apparent since I became Interim City Manager, and then City Manager, as she chose to read my entire contract in front of my family. My wife, children, and grandchildren had to hear her misrepresent the law. And then three days later she chose to read it again at the Friends of Bayshore meeting in its entirety witnessed by Acting Chief Christiansen and others.
No one, my staff, myself, distinguished Councilmembers, citizens, contractors, nor consultants should have to endure this type of behavior and abuse of power. This memorandum is in defense of City staff, some of which have experienced this abuse firsthand. While this is uncomfortable to have to share this information, I believe this is necessary because it appears this will continue to metastasize and will erode staff’s ability to effectively conduct business on behalf of the citizens of Daly City.
It is a pleasure and privilege to work for four of the five Councilmembers. You are extremely professional, personable and are very respectful in your interactions with City staff and myself. I can provide more information at the Council’s request. I would be happy to talk to the full Council or the Ethics Subcommittee on this topic and provide more details.
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: Finding of Public Convenience and Necessity PCN-2-23-16098 to Sell Alcoholic Beverages for Off-Site Consumption at Seafood City at 1420 Southgate Avenue Recommended Action
Consider a finding that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the issuance of a Type-21 liquor license by the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC).
Background
The applicant, Young’s Market Place, Inc. dba Seafood City, has filed an application with ABC to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 21 License) for off-site consumption at the new Saint Francis Square store, located at 1420 Southgate Avenue (see Attachment A – Site Location). According to the applicant, the alcoholic beverages sales would be ancilliary to the store’s annual gross sales. The applicant estimates that 100 square feet or less than 0.5 percent of the store total sales floor area would be dedicated to the display of alcoholic beverages. Seafood City will be open daily 8AM9PM.
ABC has determined that a finding of Public Convenience and Necessity (PCN) by the Daly City City Council is necessary before it can issue the license due to the store being located within a high crime reporting district. ABC uses crime statistics data from all crime reporting districts within the local jurisdiction to determine if the location for which the application for a new license is located in a high crime reporting district. ABC defines a high crime reporting district as one where there is a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of reported crimes, as determined from all reporting districts within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency There are a total of 14 crime reporting districts in Daly City. According to ABC, the subject site is located in Daly City crime reporting district 13, which had a total of 508 offenses within the crime reporting period reported to ABC. The average number of offenses for the City within that same time period is 173 per district.
In considering the request, the City Council must determine whether the issuance of the license will serve the public convenience or necessity. The applicant is contending that the allowance of alcoholic beverage sales would allow the store to offer local residents general retail and groceries without necessitating a second trip to another store for alcoholic beverages, or skipping the store altogether in favor of a grocery store that sells alcoholic beverages.
Discussion
Staff has prepared the following list of facts that the City Council may find useful in determining whether issuance of the license for Seafood City would serve the public convenience or necessity:
1. Seafood City has applied for a Type 21 license for their new location at the Saint Francis Square Shopping Center. This license allows for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirts for off-site consumption only.
City Council Agenda Report
Public Convenience and Necessity PCN-2-23-16098 January 22, 2024 Seafood City – 1420 Southgate Avenue Page 2 of 3
2. Seafood City is located in a census tract considered by ABC as a high crime reporting district, as there have been 508 calls to this district. This exceeds 20% of the average for the other reporting districts in Daly City.
3. There are a total of 14 crime reporting districts in Daly City. According to the Daly City Police Department, there was a total of four police reports taken with the address of 1420 Southgate Ave. listed. The date range searched for was from 01/01/2017 – 11/20/2023. They range from theft, burglary, and battery, to domestic disturbances.
4. Seafood City is situated in the SC (C-N) Sullivan Corridor Specific Plan (Neighborhood Commercial) zone, where retail stores are a permitted use. The Saint Francis Square Shopping Center is surrounded by a single family residential neighborhood.
5. The following are the uses within close proximity of Seafood City that specifically attract and/or serve youth (see Attachment B – Uses That Attract or Serve Youth):
Fernando Rivera Middle School, 1255 Southgate Avenue
Daniel Webster Elementary School, 425 El Dorado Drive
Thomas Edison Elementary School - 1267 Southgate Avenue
6. The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) allows up to three Off-Site licenses within census tract 6015.02. There are no current licenses issued within the census tract.
Summary
The City Council may desire to:
1. Deny the request that the public convenience and necessity would be served by the issuance of a Type 21 license to sell beer and wine at Seafood City located at 1420 Southgate Avenue; or
2. Find that persons living in Census Tract 6015.02 are not adequately served by the existing alcoholic beverage sales outlets and that the public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of a license for the sale of beer and wine to Seafood City located at 1420 Southgate Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian Paland Tatum Mothershead
Assistant Planner Director of Economic and Community
Development
Attachments
Attachment A – Site Location
Attachment B – Uses That Attract or Serve Youth
City Council Agenda Report
Public Convenience and Necessity PCN-2-23-16098 January 22, 2024 Seafood City – 1420 Southgate Avenue Page 3 of 3
Site Location
Attachment B – Uses That Attract or
Serve Youth
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: January 22, 2024
Subject: General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21- 14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, Design Review DR-04-21-15000, and Development Agreement – Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Adopt Resolution Approving General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, Design Review DR-04-21-15000, and Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report;
2. Adopt Urgency Ordinance approving Planned Development PD-04-21-14997 (PD31B); and
3. Adopt Urgency Ordinance approving the Development Agreement between the City of Daly City and the Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD), allowing redevelopment of the Serramonte Del Rey Campus located at 699 Serramonte Boulevard.
Planning Commission Discussion
On December 5, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 (unanimous) to recommend approval of the proposed General Plan amendment, rezoning, subdivision, design review, and EIR certification. The Planning Commission also found the Draft Development Agreement in conformance with the City’s General Plan.
Planning Commission discussion items are shown in bold italics.
Background
The Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan (PD-31) was approved for the Serramonte Del Rey Campus in 1985 (see Attachment A – Location Map) and allowed up to 175 residential units and 500,000 square feet of office space, or 700,000 square feet of office space, within the campus area. An amendment to the Precise Plan (PD-31A) was approved in January 2020 for the northwest section of the site to allow for the construction of a Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD) faculty and staff housing project which was completed in 2022.
The project site is bounded by Serramonte Boulevard to the north, Callan Boulevard to the east, existing residential development to the west, and multi-family residential development, a school, and medical office to the south (Phase I of the 1985 Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan). The project site currently consists of a main building occupied by JUHSD offices and non-profit organizations, temporary buildings, surface parking, and JUHSD faculty and staff housing. There is also a school garden located in the southwest corner of the project site. This garden has been used by JUHSD for adult education as a demonstration garden.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 2 of 38 The applicant and property owner, JUHSD, has submitted an application that proposes a new Precise Plan for the campus (see Attachment B – Draft Precise Plan). The proposed Precise Plan would allow for the redevelopment of the campus to include up to 1,235 units (122 existing) of affordable and market-rate rental housing, up to 14,000 sq. ft. of neighborhood-serving retail/commercial uses, and a Head Start childcare facility. The site would be divided into six development parcels and additional street parcels with public access easements (see parcel plan below). Build-out of the site is anticipated to be over a ten-year period.
After considerable public input, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (5-0 vote) to recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plan on August 3, 2021. Also, after considerable public input and gaining input from meetings of the Affordable Housing Committee and joint meetings between the Affordable Housing Committee and members of the Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD) Board, the City Council granted Preliminary Plan approval (4-1 vote) for the project on January 10, 2022, allowing the project to proceed to the Precise Plan stage.
Since this time, the applicant and staff have worked to draft a Development Agreement that provides guarantees to both the City and the applicant about the timing of off-site improvements, provision of affordable housing, and similar topics (see Attachment C - Serramonte Del Rey Draft Development Agreement Summary and Attachment D – Draft Development Agreement). The attached summary was shared with a Council Committee in October 2023 and the Committee took no issue with the overall terms the applicant and staff have agreed to submit for full City Council consideration. Staff has evaluated the Draft Development Agreement, has determined that it is consistent with the General Plan. The Planning Commission has also found that the agreement is consistent the General Plan.
The project, as proposed, requires the following entitlements:
1. General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation from Residential – High Density (R-HD) and Commercial – Office (C-O) to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU);
2. Rezone project site from Planned Development 31 (PD-31) and Planned Development 31A (PD-31A) to a new Planned Development;
3. Design Review for the site and building design for the proposed development and site improvements on Parcel B;
4. Major subdivision to subdivide the project site into six development parcels and additional street parcels with public access easements;
5. Certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the project;
6. Adoption of a Water Supply Assessment for the project; and
7. Approval of the Development Agreement for the project.
The City Council should be aware that the application includes a request for Design Review approval of a 201-unit mixed-use building with approximately 6,000 square feet of retail space that would be located on Parcel B. This building’s design qualities are discussed in the Design Review section of
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 3 of 38 this staff report. Because the project is included in the City’s Draft Housing Element, it is necessary that approvals of subsequent buildings happen administratively -without additional public hearings.
For this reason, the applicant and staff have worked together to develop Objective Design Standards that provide for a streamlined review process that would allow the buildings approved in the Precise Plan to proceed to building permit stage. These Objective Design Standards are contained proposed Precise Plan and reference and incorporated into the Planned Development zoning regulations that would be applicable to the site.
• Kalimah Salahuddin, President of the Jefferson Union High School District School Board, outlined the District’s goals for redeveloping the site. She highlighted the District’s issues with funding the educational needs of high school students and how the students in the JUHSD receive less funding from the state than their counterparts in other parts of the county. She stated that the District is trying close this gap. She also addressed that the needs of the District’s students are greater than these counterparts and that the District has greater needs to meet with fewer resources. She made an example of food distribution and that the District goes above providing food to students but also runs a food distribution program.
• Cata Gomes asked that the proposed building on Parcel F be modified to respect the wildlife that occurs on the site and stated that it was imperative that the valuable ecosystem at this location be preserved. She requested that height be modified to reflect natural wildlife that occurs there.
• Clayton Koo spoke in favor of the project as a lifelong resident, neighbor, and graduate of JUHSD.
• Maurice Goodman, also a graduate of the District and current Vice Mayor of the City of Millbrae, and Acting President of the San Mateo County NAACP, and acting as the NAACP’s sole voice, expressed support for project.
• Gia, from Housing Choices, provided insight as to how the affordable housing aspects of the project would benefit displaced people and those facing homelessness. • Rob Chua, former student of JUHSD, stated that he grew up down the street from project and supported the self-determination for the JUHSD that the project represented. He added that he felt that the project is an existential cause for people to live and thrive in the community.
• Melissa Kallstrom, resident at Serramonte Ridge Apartments, indicated that the community garden had been used for classes and the that the JUHSD has made the garden to feel like a prison with microphones overlooking persons who visit as the microphones face right into the garden. She added that the discrimination of having all the low-income people in one building wasn’t a good way for people to live. She also indicated that the apartment owner tried to force people out of their affordable units so they could rent them as market rate units, and that the complex had fallen into disrepair.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 4 of 38 • Karim Tolluck expressed his support for the project and how Self-Housing Choices has been a helpful resource in helping find a new home.
• Nick Ochipinti expressed concerns over the segregation caused by the project and said that the project needs to go back to the drawing board.
• Melissa Ambrose, the JUHSD Wellness Coordinator, expressed support for the project. • Alexis Lewis expressed support for the project.
• Laurie Hughes expressed support for the project.
• Kioaa Simmons, an organizer with Housing Leadership Council, expressed support for the project.
• Debbie Santiago, member of the American Indian Advisory Council, stated that the owners of Serramonte Ridge Apartments kicked her out and the City provided no help. She stated that the community garden was an essential during the pandemic. • Nels DeLander, representing NorCal Carpenters Union, expressed concern that the project have a Letter of Intent and that the contractor that builds the project provide livable wages and benefits.
• Bryan Shields, a field representative from Carpenters Local 217, stated the project was an opportunity for carpenters to live in the community in which they work. • Maxwell Yakanich, a ninth grader at Terra Nova High School, expressed support for the project due to the increased funding helping attract and retain teachers, and help fund student programs.
• Eden Magbilang, a student trustee, expressed support for the project. • Amirah Tullock expressed support for the project.
• Teresa Proaño asked how much revenue the project could expect to provide to JUHSD annually. Ms. Salahuddin stated that the District has not discussed the answer to this question publicly but that the revenue is not tied up the ways that other monies the District receives are. She also reviewed the District’s budget processes with the Planning Commissioners.
• Commissioner Faaupua stated that the beauty of this project was that, because of the leases, the project provides a stable flow of money, unlike money coming from other governmental sources.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 5 of 38 Precise Plan Discussion
As stated in the proposed Precise Plan, the vision for the project is to transform the project site into a new walkable, bikeable, and family-friendly residential neighborhood. JUHSD anticipates attracting investment by the development community through use of long-term ground leases and/or joint venture agreements to develop the neighborhood on a parcel-by-parcel basis. The District’s stated intentions for doing so are to provide a much-needed revenue source that will assist chiefly with faculty and staff attraction and retention in a highly competitive job market. The District’s achievement in building the 122-unit faculty and staff housing project at the northwest corner of the site has assisted in this effort and the District has made a considerable investment in the development application before the City Council to leverage its remaining assets in manner that benefits the educational needs of the City’s public high schools.
To this end, the Precise Plan establishes an urban design plan for the 22-acre site, including details about development capacity, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parks and open space, infrastructural needs, and implementation (phasing). The Objective Development Standards are also a large component of the Precise Plan and provide significant details about urban design, architectural, and landscape design concepts, including building height and massing, all of which must be satisfied in any building permit application. The Precise Plan was developed with significant input by Planning, Public Works, and North County Fire Authority staff and its sections are summarized as follows:
Objective Development Standards (pages 15-58). The Objectives Design Standards provide a regulatory framework for land use and urban design, architectural design, parking and loading, landscape design, and lighting. As discussed previously, because implementation of the Precise Plan must occur administratively, i.e., without subjective evaluations from the Planning Commission and City Council, it is necessary to have a detailed and comprehensive design framework against which specific construction proposals may be evaluated by the Planning Division staff. The Planning Commissioners are encouraged to review the concepts contained with the Objectives Design Standards and ask questions at the Planning Commission meeting if there is anything that is unclear or if there are topics not addressed within these regulations that the Commission feels should be addressed.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 6 of 38 One of the primary components of the Objective Design Standards is establishing the parcel lines that are currently contemplated and the development intensity that can be expected on each of the resulting six parcels, which are lettered in a clockwise direction on the site “A” through “F,” with the existing 122-unit faculty and staff housing project situated at the northwest corner of the Precise Plan area as Parcel “A.” The images below and on the next page depict the proposed parcel configuration and development intensity.
Perhaps the most significant regulations contained in the standards relates to permissible building height, which is identified in the image below. While the height limits for Parcels B and C would be contained in a 90-foot podium, the permitted building height limits for Parcels D, E and F could extent to 150 feet for tower, which are subject to a dimensional maximum above the podium.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 7 of 38 To provide some context for these allowances, the proposed Parcel B building is a six-story building and 73 feet in height from finished grade to the top of the parapet. Assuming similar plate heights in new buildings on Parcels D, E, and F, building heights as tall as 14 stories could be expected. It is for this reason that staff and the applicant have worked on including strong regulatory concepts within the Precise Plan for architectural character, massing, and façade composition. The Objective Design Standards, for example, require that specific percentages of a building’s frontage be constructed to a “build to” line, as identified in the image below, to ensure that future buildings are not overly set back from the street and provide a lively interface with the adjacent street and sidewalk. Figures 3.4 and 3.6 (below) in the Precise Plan provide a graphic example of how these regulations would mandate an activated street frontage for new buildings.
While all the urban design and architectural concepts included in the Precise Plan are too numerous to discuss in this staff report, the Council members are encouraged to review the Objective Design Standards and raise issues or ask questions at the City Council meeting.
While all the urban design and architectural concepts included in the Precise Plan are too numerous to discuss in this staff report, the Council members are encouraged to review the Objective Design Standards and raise issues or ask questions at the City Council meeting.
Circulation (pages 59-84). The Circulation component communicates the roadway and pedestrian network the staff and applicant have agreed to for the Precise Plan area, all of which will be private and maintained by a Master Association established and maintained by JUHSD. The establishment for the Master Association is specified in the Planned Development regulations and would be required prior to any construction.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 8 of 38 As represented in figures below, the circulation system in the Precise Plan would essentially be a looped system of traffic calmed low-speed roadways, connected to Serramonte Boulevard to the north and Hickey Boulevard to the south. This section communicates the roadway lane configurations that have been agreed to by the Public Works Department.
Entry Drive has been conceived as the Precise Plan area’s “main street,” the design of which is characterized by adjacent retail uses to its east (contemplated in the future Parcel B first floor) and a linear pedestrian plaza extending from Serramonte Boulevard to the Central Green, north of Parcel E. The street section on the next page shows the agreed-to lane configuration for Entry Drive, which is comprised of two 11-foot travel lanes, two 10-foot continuous through/turn lanes, five-foot protected bike lanes with a two-foot buffer, and a six-foot landscape median. Sidewalks would be constructed on both sides of the street, with a six-foot-wide sidewalk on the west side separated from the street by a five-foot planting strip. On the east side, a wide sidewalk would be installed that would be comprised of three zones: a planting and street furniture zone, a through- zone for pedestrians, and a frontage zone for active ground floor uses to extend onto the sidewalk.
The Precise Plan includes several pedestrian facilities that would allow residents to walk and bike through the site and access on-site recreation and retail amenities. Sidewalks are provided on every street within the Plan Area, with curbside planting strips for street trees and storm water filtration. A trail loop separated from vehicles would also provide pedestrian access around the site in a more natural setting. Sidewalk and trails have been designed to provide residents the ability walk between the Plan Area’s parks, open spaces, residences, and retail shops.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 9 of 38 In addition to Entry Drive, cross sections of all roads in the Precise Plan area are represented graphically in the Precise Plan Circulation section. Like Entry Drive, these sections have been accepted by the Public Works and Fire Department. As will be discussed subsequently, roadways like all improvements will be phased over several years and the applicant and staff have worked to ensure that the proposed plan is realistic and can be implemented in a way that meets both the City and District’s objectives.
Parks and Open Space (pages 69-78). As shown in the figure on the subsequent page, the Precise Plan proposes the provision and configuration of common open space for the Precise Plan area essentially in five spaces:
1. Central Green (the plan area’s focal park) – Parcel E
2. Overlook Park (includes community garden accessible to all Daly City residents) – Parcel B
3. South Point Park - Parcel E
4. Eastside Recreational Trail – Parcel F
5. Westside Walking Trail – Parcels B, C, and D
Each of these open spaces area would be built at the same time as their respective parcel and all would count, in combination with private open space, toward the Planned Development zoning requirement of 150 square feet of open space per unit. Additionally, all these areas would be accessible to all residents of Daly City though the recordation of public access easements.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 10 of 38 Because not all parcels contain significant amounts these common open space areas, i.e., Parcels D, C, and F, the Planned Development zoning has been written so to allow the allocation of open space on any given parcel to be provided on another Precise Plan parcel, provided previously developed parcels have a surplus of the 150 square foot requirement. • Commissioner Proaño asked if the proposed community garden is in same location as the existing garden. Ms. Salahuddin answered that it is in a completely different location due to the need to place building height on the project site at the location of the existing garden.
She added that it was never the District’s intention to allow for a community garden at this location. She stated that as soon as the new District offices are completed that the community garden is being removed, notwithstanding the decision made by the City on the subject project.
Utilities (pages 79-84)). This section provides an overview of the public infrastructure that would be necessary to implement the Precise Plan. As indicated in the Conditions of Approval, the applicant has completed water and sewer analyses, and would be required to install all the improvements mandated by these studies.
Implementation (pages 85-100). As contemplated, the project is anticipated to be built out in three phases:
1. The first phase would maintain the existing JUHSD building and demolish the surface parking lot located between the existing school building and Serramonte Boulevard. The proposed mixed-use development on Parcel B would be constructed as well as Entry Drive, North Drive, and Overlook Park. North Access Way as needed for access to Overlook Park.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 11 of 38
2. The second phase would include demolition of the existing JUHSD building and the remaining surface parking lots and access roads within the project site. All outbuildings will be either relocated or demolished and housing on Parcels C and D would be constructed. A new Head Start facility would also be constructed on Parcel C. The improvements would include construction of East Drive and any necessary utilities.
3. The third phase would include the build out of Parcels E and F, Central Green, and the open green space at the entry to the site from the south of the Precise Plan area.
To allow for a variety of phasing scenarios, the applicant has worked with the Public Works and Fire Departments to the ensure that buildout of the project occurs in an orderly manner, as identified in the footnotes of the following figure and its footnotes.
In addition to Precise Plan phasing information, the Implementation section outlines the process for “Conformance Review,” which is essentially the Precise Plan’s ministerial, streamlined process for staff approval of new buildings in each of the Precise Plan’s phases. As indicated previously, these approvals would essentially ensure that the proposed phase has demonstrated consistency with the Precise Plan and Objective Development Standards described in this section. As is the case with almost all development – and especially a project this size – changes are inevitable and the Precise Plan provides for administrative relief from the numerical standards contained within it, up to 20
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 12 of 38 percent. Deviations from the minimum and maximum densities prescribed in the Precise Plan, the required amount of private open space (150 square feet per dwelling unit), and the quantity and general location of common open space shall not be permitted, as are modifications to the Precise Plan pattern of streets and blocks, shape of open space areas, site layout, orientation or location of buildings.
Design Review (Building B)
The application includes a request for Design Review approval of Parcel B, a 201-unit mixed-use building with approximately 6,000 square feet of retail immediately east of the existing facility and staff housing development, adjacent to Serramonte Boulevard (see Attachment E – Design Review Submittal for Parcel B). The application for Design Review contemplated that this building would be constructed first, although that may no longer be the case.
The proposed building is six-stories of apartments over a parking podium and retail that would be 73 feet tall. The building would provide 21 studio units, 75 one-bedroom units, 86 two-bedroom units, and 28 three-bedroom units. Although the City is precluded from regulating parking in the Precise Plan pursuant to Assembly Bill AB 2097, the applicant has proposed 334 parking spaces, 301 for residents and 33 for the public, within the lower and ground levels of the proposed mixed-use building.
It is staff’s conclusion that Parcel B building would meet all the Objective Design Standards contained within the Precise Plan. It exhibits high design quality and provides a contemporary architectural design. The pedestrian level façade setbacks from the build-to-line do not exceed 10 feet, helping to create a pedestrian level setback for active uses with occupied floors above. Also, the first level of the building is differentiated from the upper floors to provide a visual enhancement for the floors above. The proposed building facades provide high quality materials appropriate for the area and the proposed design would be very complimentary to the adjacent faculty and staff housing building to the west.
Staff has no recommendations for Conditions of Approval for the proposed apartment building. • Commissioner Proaño expressed concerns about parking because as much as the State and environmentalists want people to ride bikes and take public transportation, she remained concerned about parking. She stated that State doesn’t mind if there is no parking, but the residents of Daly City do, and so she was happy to see that the initial project (Parcel B) included parking and that she hopes each developer sees the value of parking in subsequent phases. She added that she was glad to see the garden in the plan, even if it wasn’t as large as what some people wanted.
• Commissioner Proaño asked if the District could select the developer based on the developer’s program for the building. Ms. Salahuddin answered that the District had approached the project with a lot of intention and that it was their desire that the product was something that they wanted to live in. She added that the District wanted to include parking because parking was a primary community concern.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 13 of 38 • Commissioner Proaño asked who would maintain each property. Ms. Salahuddin answered that each developer would maintain their property. She added that the District board members had visited or intended to visit projects built by various developers to gauge the level of quality associated with what each of the developers built. • Commissioner Paniza asked if private security would be provided at the project. Staff clarified that he meant permanent security after construction and answered that security had yet to be determined.
Subdivision Requirements
The application includes a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide the 22-acre Precise Plan area into six development parcels and five common parcels for private roadways (see Attachment F – Tentative Subdivision Map). Pursuant to Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, a legislative body of a city or county may approve a subdivision map, including a condominium map, if it makes the following findings:
1. The proposed subdivision and/or design or improvement must be consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
• The project includes a proposal to amend the General Plan designation from Residential – High Density (R-HD) and Commercial – Office (C-O) to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU).
According to the City’s General Plan, this designation is intended for mixed-use development in areas where the City intends to provide, through the Zoning Ordinance, regulatory incentives and/or requirements for developers to construct buildings which contain a vertical mix of uses, e.g. retail or restaurant uses at the street level and office or residential uses at levels above the street. The applicant’s project exhibits these characteristics and therefore the Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU) General Plan Land Use Designation is appropriate for the proposed project and the project is consistent the policies contained within the General Plan for this land use designation.
2. The site must be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. • The project site is physically suitable to the development proposed by the Precise Plan, which are apartment buildings that would be built on large podiums. The subject site flat, easily allowing this type of construction, and has been previously disturbed and extensively graded to allow the construction of a high school with similar building footprints.
3. The design of the proposed subdivision or improvements must not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. • The environmental impact of the proposed Precise Plan was thoroughly evaluated in Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The EIR found that the Precise Plan would not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 14 of 38
4. The design of the proposed subdivision must not cause serious public health problems. • There are no foreseeable public health problems that could arise from the implementation of the Precise Plan.
5. The design of the proposed subdivision or improvements must not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.
• Although several easements exist on the site, the proposed subdivision will be subject to a thorough plan check by the Public Works Department prior to recordation. Any issues related to underlying easements will be remedied at that time.
General Plan, Zoning, and Project Density
The General Plan land use designation for the JUHSD faculty and staff housing site (Parcel A) is Residential – High Density (R-HD) and the remainder of the project site is Commercial – Office (CO). The Precise Plan would allow residential and commercial uses (some uses would require a Conditional Use Permit) on any parcel. The development program in the Precise Plan also provides guidelines for the proposed build out of the site with residential densities ranging from 34 to 96 dwellings units per acre. Since the Precise Plan would allow both residential and commercial uses on each parcel within the Plan Area, an amendment to the General Plan to change the land use designation to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU) is required.
The proposed Precise Plan would also implement the General Plan Housing Element which encourages the development of infill housing on sites that are underutilized, where residential development represents the highest and best use, and where public infrastructure exists to support the intensity of the proposed development. The Housing Element identifies this site specifically as being capable of providing housing opportunities that contribute to the City’s fulfillment of its Regional Housing Need Allocation.
Regarding zoning, Parcel A is currently zoned PD-31A while the remainder of the project site is zoned PD-31. Since the Precise Plan identifies a new vision and goals, development standards, and guidelines for the project area, a new Planned Development is required. Because Phase I of the 1985 Precise Plan located south of the project site is already built out with multi-family rental housing and school and medical uses, this area is excluded from the project and the General Plan designation and zoning shall remain Commercial – Office and PD-31 respectively.
The new zoning, which would pertain to the Precise Plan area only, would be PD-31B, replacing PD31A for the staff and faculty housing site (see Attachment G – Draft Planned Development 31B Regulations).
Regional Housing Need Allocation
The City Council should be aware that the project -- if approved -- would contribute significantly to the City meeting its Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) allocation for the 2023-2031 planning period, as was communicated to the Council in its review of the Draft Housing Element in
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 15 of 38 May. Subsequent to the Council’s review, staff submitted the Draft Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) which is currently reviewing the element for compliance with State law. Staff anticipates receiving certification of the element from HCD in February and potentially holding hearings to adopt the Housing Element in March.
The attorney for JUHSD has provided a letter to the City Council outlining the implications to the Housing Element process should the Council decide not to approve the proposed project (see Attachment H – Letter from Hanson Bridgett Regarding Project RHNA Implications). Staff concurs with the premise of the letter and adds that pending litigation against the City concerning the City’s lack of compliance in the adoption of the adopted Housing Element emphasizes the need for the City Council to take final action on the proposed project. Should the City Council deny the project, the draft of the Element currently under review by HCD would require a fairly radical amendment that could significantly delay this review as Planning Division staff explores properties around the City to rezone to make up for 1,113-unit shortfall caused by the Serramonte Del Rey project not moving forward.
For this reason, the City Attorney and Planning Division staff have established the findings for the urgency ordinance consideration to adopt the Planned Development zoning for the site and the Development Agreement proposed for the project. The urgency ordinance requires a four-fifths vote by the Council. Should the City Council determine that an urgency ordinance is appropriate, staff has included additional findings in this staff report that would allow for such an urgency ordinance to be adopted.
Affordable Housing
The terms of JUHSD providing affording housing in the Precise Plan area is contained in both the Development Agreement and proposed Planned Development 31B zoning regulations. Staff, the District, and the City Council’s Affordable Housing Committee have made a significant effort to establish deeper levels of affordability for the project than City’s current Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would otherwise require. The following summarizes the agreement reached between the City and JUHSD:
• Parcel C will provide 150 affordable housing units ranging from 23 percent AMI to 60 percent AMI;
• 24 units will be set aside for residents with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD); • 12 units will be at 23% AMI, with the intention that these families can qualify to utilize the on-site Head Start facility;
• 20 percent Affordable Housing representing double the affordable housing required by City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance:
• Parcel C will include 150 affordable units plus 2 manager’s units (13.5% of the proposed units in Parcels B through F) at Very Low and Low Income levels; • Parcels D through F will include up to 73 units at Moderate Income levels; and
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 16 of 38 • The affordable housing developer will offer wrap-around support services for Parcel C residents.
Under the terms of the agreement, one market rate building may be built prior to the affordable housing and without Moderate Income units. After the first market rate building, each subsequent market rate building will be built with 10 percent of the units at Moderate Income. The final market rate building will be built with the number of Moderate-Income units necessary to bring the overall percentage of affordable units to 20 percent overall. Furthermore, the affordable housing parcel may be built with two affordable housing buildings. One affordable housing building with at least 60 units will be built before a second market rate rental housing building can built. After the first market rate building is built, the overall percentage of Very Low- and Low-Income affordable housing will not drop below 13.5% of the overall unit count (Parcels B through F).
In the unlikely event that the affordable housing project takes longer than anticipated to be built after the first market rate building is completed, contingencies will ensure affordable housing representing
13.5% of the units are provided.
• Nancy Lacsamana clarified that the project only provides 13.5 percent low- and very lowincome and suggested the project did not cater to Daly City households. She expressed concern that the all these low- and very low-income units were concentrated in a single building.
• Commissioner Proaño asked if there was any law that preventing all the affordable housing being in one building. Ms. Salahuddin answered that there was no legal prohibition.
Commissioner Satorre indicted that State Density Bonus Law had such a prohibition. Ms.
Salahuddin answered that recent projects have been done the same thing, one as close as in the City of San Francisco. Teddy Newmyer from Eden Housing stated that the nonprofit frequently builds affordable housing in one building and that this is usually the case because financing requires that it be built that way and that it actually benefits residents to be built that way. He added that the none of the recent density bonus laws disallow this.
Office Market and Fiscal Impact Study
JUHSD submitted an office market and fiscal impact study prepared by BAE Urban Economics, Inc. (BAE) to supplement their request for a zone change and commercial-mixed use neighborhood proposal (see Attachment I – Office Market Assessment and Fiscal Impact Review). The analysis evaluated the project site’s potential to attract commercial office use and presented the results of the fiscal impact analysis of three recently approved residential projects in Daly City to demonstrate the potential for residential development to generate positive fiscal benefits for the City.
After review of the site’s characteristics and Daly City’s relative position in the regional economy and San Mateo County office market, the analysis concluded the project site is not a competitive location to attract office development. Office uses have been permitted with the PD-31 Plan area since 1985, but only one medical office building has been constructed. Located outside the Highway 101/Caltrain Corridor, the office sector in Daly City has failed to gain traction over the past few decades despite the presence of two Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) stations and City efforts and
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 17 of 38 investment to stimulate Class A office development. Further, the economic impacts of the COVID19 pandemic have led to a short-term reduction of office demand driven by shelter-in-place orders and uncertainty on the long-term impact of the pandemic on regional office market demand.
As for residential development, the review of three fiscal impact analyses for recently approved Daly City residential projects concluded that in-fill development projects have yielded net positive impacts such as injecting additional retail spending power into the city that can support the City’s existing and expanded retail centers and corridors.
The analysis also concluded that there is an important indirect fiscal benefit associated with new residential development specifically at this project site. Since JUHSD intends to ground lease the site for development which will generate an ongoing stream of cash rental payments, the new source of revenue will enhance JUHSD’s operating budget and thus improve the quality of education in Daly City. The analysis noted that improved school quality has been documented to increase housing values in the communities where the schools are located and thus will increase tax revenue for both JUHSD and Daly City. The project would stimulate a virtuous cycle that could improve the quality of City services and school district operations.
• Commissioner Satorre stated that the consultant who prepared the fiscal impact analysis for the project maligned Daly City in the report he issued. He took specific issue with the study’s conclusion that the site was not optimal for Class A office space. The consultant explained that it was his finding that the site was at a competitive disadvantage and that this did not reflect poorly on the City as a whole. The applicant agreed to make some revisions to the study by incorporating the City’s positive attributes.
Utility Providers
The subject property is located within a fully urbanized area and is already connected to all public services capable of serving the proposed master plan area.
Utility Provider
Water, Sanitary Sewers, Storm Drains City of Daly City / Bayshore Sanitary District Gas & Electric PG&E
Telephone AT&T
Cable Television Wave Cable Services and/or Comcast
Fire/Police Protection Daly City
As indicated in the Conditions of Approval for the project, the applicant has completed water and sewer analyses, which make specific recommendations for infrastructure improvements that must be implemented by the project. The requirements to do are embodied in Conditions of Approval issued by the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources (DWWR).
Water Supply Assessment
In accordance with the California Water Code, the project scope requires the preparation of a WSA, which must be adopted prior to certification of the Final Environment Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project (see Attachment J – Water Supply Assessment). Prepared in accordance with the
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 18 of 38 California Water Code, the WSA has found that the projected available annual potable water supplies under non-drought periods (normal conditions) for the Daly City water system in 2045 are 2,819 million gallons (MG), and the estimated potable demand is 2,206 million gallon per year (MGY), where 86 MG is from the proposed project demand. The WSA determined that Daly City would have access to sufficient water supplies to serve the proposed Serramonte Del Rey Redevelopment project.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the WSA was circulated as an attachment to the Draft EIR prepared for the project for a 45-day public comment period, including State Clearinghouse review, and would remain an attachment to the adopted FEIR.
Environmental Assessment
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) to assess the potential environmental consequences of implementing the proposed Precise Plan (see Attachment K – Final Environmental Impact Report).
The FEIR incorporates the Draft EIR (DEIR), which the City made available for public review from July 25, 2023, through September 8, 2023. Copies of all written comments received on the DEIR are contained in the FEIR, as are responses to these comments. During the public review period, the City received comments from 38 interested parties. These comments are contained within the FEIR Appendix A: EIR Comment Letters.
The City Council should be aware that the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) identified several significant environmental impacts associated with the project, including impacts to air quality, biology, cultural resources, geological resources, hazardous materials, noise, and transportation. A summary of these mitigation measures is provided in the Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMRP) that has been prepared for the project and recommended for adoption (Attachment L – Mitigation and Monitoring Program).
Findings
The Planning Commission found that, as conditioned, the proposed General Plan Amendment GPA04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000, comply with Title 17 (Zoning) of the Daly City Municipal Code.
Approval of the proposed project would not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing in or working in the neighborhood, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. Approval of the proposed Major Subdivision General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04- 21-15000, as conditioned herein, is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community, and that the general site aesthetics have been incorporated to ensure compatibility with adjacent buildings and to provide an attractive environment.
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following findings, should the Council decide to approve the project:
1. In accordance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code, as well as applicable State zoning enabling legislation, the City Council conducted a public hearing to consider the
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 19 of 38 project on January 22, 2024; notice of said hearing was by newspaper publication on January 7, 2024, posting and first class mailing to property owners within 300 feet;
2. The site is physically suitable for the type of proposed project and amending the General Plan designation for the Precise Plan area from Residential – High Density (R-HD) and Commercial – Office (C-O) to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU), and rezoning the Precise Plan area from Planned Development 31 (PD-31) and Planned Development 31A (PD-31A) to Planned Development 31B (PD-31B);
3. The proposed project is consistent with Daly City General Plan. The project in fact includes a proposal to amend the General Plan designation from Residential – High Density (R-HD) and Commercial – Office (C-O) to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU). According to the City’s General Plan, this designation is intended for mixed-use development in areas where the City intends to provide, through the Zoning Ordinance, regulatory incentives and/or requirements for developers to construct buildings which contain a vertical mix of uses, e.g. retail or restaurant uses at the street level and office or residential uses at levels above the street. The applicant’s project exhibits these characteristics and therefore the Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU) General Plan Land Use Designation is appropriate for the proposed project and the project is consistent the policies contained within the General Plan for this land use designation;
4. The project also implements the policies in the Housing Element, which encourages the development of infill housing on sites that are underutilized, where residential development represents the highest and best use, and where public infrastructure exists to support the intensity of the proposed development. The Housing Element identifies the subject site specifically as being capable of providing housing opportunities that contribute to the City’s fulfillment of its Regional Housing Need Allocation;
5. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The project site is physically suitable to the development proposed by the Precise Plan, which are apartment buildings that would be built on large podiums. The subject site flat, easily allowing this type of construction, and has been previously disturbed and extensively graded to allow the construction of a high school with similar building footprints;
6. The design of the proposed subdivision or improvements does not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The environmental impact of the proposed Precise Plan was thoroughly evaluated in Environmental Impact Report (EIR); The EIR found that the Precise Plan would not cause substantial environmental damage or injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
7. The design of the proposed subdivision will not cause serious public health problems. There are no foreseeable public health problems that could arise from the implementation of the Precise Plan;
8. The design of the proposed subdivision and improvements do not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Although several easements exist on the site, the proposed subdivision will be
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 20 of 38 subject to a thorough plan check by the Public Works Department prior to recordation. Any issues related to underlying easements will be remedied at that time;
9. The proposed building for Parcel B complies with applicable provisions of Design Review Section 17.45 of the Zoning Ordinance and the Objective Design Standards set forth in the Precise Plan and Planned Development zoning, both herein recommended for approval to the City Council;
10. Architectural considerations have been incorporated in order to ensure the general compatibility of this development with the character of other adjacent buildings. These considerations include, but are not limited to, the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, and colors;
11. In accordance with the California Water Code, a Water Supply Assessment has been prepared for the project in accordance with the California Water Code. The WSA found that Daly City would have access to sufficient water supplies to serve the proposed Serramonte Del Rey Redevelopment project;
12. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City issued a Notice of Completion for a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts that could result from the shopping center expansion. The DEIR was submitted to the State Clearinghouse for public dissemination on July 25, 2023. The DEIR was circulated for comment for at least 45 days (from July 25, 2023, through September 8, 2023) in accordance with the requirements of CEQA;
13. The City has prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), incorporating the comments and responses to comments of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), in accordance with the requirements of CEQA.
14. The Certification of the FEIR affirms the documentation that all the project’s environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance. A Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP) has also been adopted for the project;
15. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Development Agreement and found it consistent with the City’s General Plan and the City Council concurs with this finding;
16. The project will minimize the risk to existing public improvements and adjacent private property by providing controlled stormwater runoff from the site to City facilities in full compliance with Order R-2 NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 and Order No. 2010-0014- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit;
17. The City did not adopt the six-cycle update to its Housing Element by the January 31, 2023, statutory deadline and is currently out of compliance with State law;
18. On February 14, 2023, Californians for Homeownership, Inc. served the City with a lawsuit and writ of mandate to adopt the Housing Element;
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 21 of 38
19. Under State law, the City’s Housing Element must provide an inventory of planned projects and site for future development that provides a realistic path to satisfy the City’s RHNA requirement, and all income levels throughout the 2023-2031 planning period;
20. Under the Draft Housing Element includes the proposed new mixed-use project at 699 Serramonte Boulevard (the “Project”) which consists of 1,113 residential units in the City, including units for 150 new low/very low-income units, 73 affordable moderate-income units, and 890 above-moderate income units;
21. In order for the City’s Housing Element to be certified by HCD, it is necessary for the units provided by the Project to be approved immediately in order to avoid the City being out of compliance with state law;
22. Failure to have a certified Housing Element would put the City at risk of losing its powers to deny housing projects in the future, including those that do not comply with the City’s zoning and General Plan (i.e., Builder’s Remedy projects);
23. Pursuant to a proposed Settlement Agreement and Order and Stipulation in the pending litigation with Californians for Homeownership, the City is required to have a certified Housing Element by March 2024; and
24. In order to comply with state law, as well as to resolve pending litigation, it is necessary that the City Council waive first reading and adopt an urgency ordinance approving Planned Development PD-31B and adopt an urgency ordinance approving the Development Agreement.
Conditions of Approval
The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000, based on the following conditions as specified by each Department and Division.
These conditions need to be complied with prior to, or as part of, any building permit for the proposed improvements.
A. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PLANNING
DIVISION)
General
1. The project shall be valid only in conjunction with detailed plans submitted with this project.
Any modifications required, due to the Conditions of Approval, and minor changes to the plan, must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the change. Major site or architectural modifications shall be treated as an amendment and shall be subject to review by the Planning Commission and City Council.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 22 of 38
2. The tentative subdivision map approval granted herein shall be valid for a period of two years.
If a final map has not been approved within this timeframe, the applicant shall apply for a time extension.
3. The design review approval granted herein shall be valid for a period of one year. If building permits have not been issued within this timeframe, the building shall comply with the Objectives Design Standards contained within Planned Development PD-31B.
Building Design
4. All retail/office areas shall be constructed to a “tenantable” condition and shall provide restroom facilities and receive wall, ceiling, and flooring finishes that render them in a leasable condition prior to final occupancy of the building. This includes commercial-grade wall and floor plugs, overhead lighting, and any other systems the Planning Division staff identifies at the time of plan check.
5. All ground floor windows shall be dark-colored aluminum and all upper-floor windows shall be metal framed or high-quality PVC with color to match the adjacent wall.
6. Any metal materials used on the exterior of any building shall be galvanized or treated in a manner acceptable to the Planning Division to prevent corrosion.
7. The applicant shall, prior to building permit submittal, provide a sign program for Planning Division review and approval. The final building elevation design shall consider sign placement and plans submitted for building permit approval shall reflect such placement.
8. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from the view of all adjacent public rights-of-way by screenwalls, painting, and similar treatments acceptable to the Planning Division. The Division may require screenwalls for equipment located within 20 feet of the rooftop parapet wall.
9. Backflow preventers, check devices, and other visible mechanical equipment shall be painted black, dark green, red (if required by the Fire Department), or other color complimentary to the building design.
10. The applicant shall have all trash storage capacity and pick-up locations approved by Republic Services.
11. The material of retaining walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be approved by the Planning Division in building permit plan check.
Stormwater Treatment
12. The applicant shall develop and submit a stormwater management plan that illustrates full compliance with Section C.3 of Order R-2-2009-0074 NPDES Permit No. CAS612008. The project must comply with Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, the
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 23 of 38 statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit.
13. The applicant shall receive approval of the stormwater management plan from a third-party reviewer appointed by the City prior to building permit submittal. The applicant shall pay the entire cost of the third-party reviewer, beginning with a $10,000 deposit from which the Planning Division may draw to pay for the costs from the third-party review and associated inspections.
14. All stormwater treatment facilities shall be inspected during construction to ensure eventual compliance with the stormwater management plan. The applicant shall pay the entire cost of these inspections.
15. The applicant shall enter into an Operation and Maintenance Agreement with the City to ensure long-term maintenance and servicing by the Property Owner of stormwater site design and treatment control measures according to the approved Operation and Maintenance Plan.
16. The applicant shall arrange and pay for final inspection of installed treatment measure by the City’s Special Inspector within 45 days of installation or project construction completion, whichever comes first.
B. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (ENGINEERING DIVISION)
PRECISE PLAN
GENERAL
17. All improvements shall be consistent with the plans approved by the City Engineer and the Conditions of Approval. All improvements shall meet the latest California Building Code, California Fire Code, Daly City Municipal Code, and the City Standards and Specifications, except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement.
18. Provide “will serve letters” from the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for gas and electric services.
19. All improvements shall be installed, inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to Engineering sign off for occupancy permits. In addition, as-built record plans of all improvements shall be submitted in a form acceptable to the City Engineer prior to Engineering sign off for occupancy permits.
20. All improvements shall be ADA compliant. Curb ramps in and around the project site shall utilize the case types in the Caltrans Standard Plans.
21. All electrical and telecommunications services shall be provided through underground connections. There shall be no overhead drops. All existing overhead services and supporting poles along the project frontage and/or on the private property shall be removed, at the applicant’s expense.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 24 of 38
22. All utility services shall be underground. Said improvements shall conform to City of Daly City and affected Agency’s standards.
23. All plans shall be accompanied by all required calculations and studies including geotechnical and impact studies to justify design signed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer.
24. Grading and improvement plan review and approval by the City Engineer are required before permit issuance. The improvement plans shall include details for on-site and off-site improvements for vehicular and pedestrian access, parking, traffic signs and markings, utility service connections, modifications and extensions of the City’s sewer, water, storm drain, safety lighting, landscaping, and other public service facilities.
25. Securities for all improvements (on-site and off-site), and applicable fees and charges, shall be submitted with any site/building permits. The applicant shall obtain all required permits before commencing work.
26. The applicant and/or Contractor shall have a project sign with a 24-hour Project contact information for public concerns such as off-site tracking, dust control, noise complaints, ground shaking and any related construction activities. The complaints and responses shall be logged, and copies provided to the City Engineer with action status on a weekly basis.
27. Provide erosion and storm water pollution plan incorporating best management practices, including operation and maintenance provisions per the requirements applicable at the time of construction permit application. During the wet/rainy season (October 1 to April 30) the developer shall submit a revised erosion control plan as necessary (every five working days) or as required by the City Engineer and/or his representative.
28. Concurrent with each demolition, grading and drainage permit submittal or as a part of the Improvement Plan package, the Applicant shall prepare a dust control plan. The plan shall conform to the City Standards and comply with the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Best Management Practices for dust control. The Applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.
29. Except as permitted in the project’s Precise Plan, no permanent building encroachment including but not limited to: awnings, canopies, marquees, signs, windows, balconies, architectural features and mechanical equipment shall be allowed in the Right-of-Way without the written authorization of the City Engineer.
30. The project’s electrical transformer shall not be installed within the public right-of-way.
31. Phasing for the development of the JUHSD Serramonte Del Rey site shall follow the Development Agreement between the City and JUHSD.
32. A current title report shall be submitted with the development of each phase/parcel.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 25 of 38
33. Prior to requesting City Council approval for any Parcel Map or Final Map, all subdivision improvements as shown on approved subdivision improvement plans shall be constructed by the applicant and accepted by the City Engineer, or the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City incorporating those subdivision improvement plans and providing required bonds to secure the completion of the subdivision improvements within the time limits specified by the City. If any final map is part of a phased subdivision, only the final map and subdivision improvement plans for subdivision improvements necessary to serve the proposed phase are required to be submitted to the City for review and approval, and subsequently constructed.
34. The improvements shall be consistent with the plans approved by, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Conditions of Approval. All construction shall meet the latest California Building Code, California Fire Code, Daly City Municipal Code and the City Standard Specifications and Drawings, except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement. Securities for all required improvements, and applicable fees and charges, shall be submitted prior to permit issuance, and/or submission of the subdivision improvement agreement for approval. The applicant shall obtain all required permits before commencing work. All required improvements shall be constructed at no cost to the City except where specifically agreed to by the City under the provisions of a written agreement, Including without limitation the project Development Agreement. Grading and improvement plan review and approval by the City Engineer are required before any City Permit is issued.
The improvement plans shall include details for on‐site and off‐site improvements for vehicular and pedestrian access, parking, traffic signs and markings, utility service connections, modifications and extension of the City’s sewer, water, storm drain, safety lighting, landscaping, and other public service and common facilities. All utility services shall be underground unless otherwise approved. Said improvements shall conform to Daly City and affected Agency’s standards, Plans shall be accompanied by all required calculations and studies including geotechnical and impact studies to justify design.
35. Except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement and the Precise Plan, the applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the “City of Daly City General Conditions of Approval: Use Permits, Variances, Design Reviews, Planned Developments, and Subdivisions”, in effect at the time of subdivision and design review application submittal, final map submittal and/or at the time of building permit application.
36. Homeowners Association (HOA) agreements to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. This includes, but is not limited to, details regarding street sweeping, street maintenance, streetlight maintenance, landscape maintenance, private storm drain maintenance, etc.
37. Haul route to the project site shall be from the Highway 1 off-ramp, across the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and the Highway 1 on/off-ramps, to Entry Dr. Haul route from the project site shall be from Entry Dr., across the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and the Highway 1 on/off-ramps, to the Highway 1 on-ramp. No trucks shall be allowed on Serramonte Blvd. outside of the intersection with Entry Dr., and no other City streets aside from Hickey Blvd. shall be used as a truck route.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 26 of 38 SITE
38. The applicant shall repair and/or replace additional areas of street pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter, streetlights, manhole, catch basins, or any other public infrastructure within the right-of-way damaged by construction activities associated with the project (utility installation, etc.) as required by the City Inspector during construction. Such repair shall be per the City’s Standards and Specifications
39. Bike parking for each phase shall be at street level and shall not require travel across parking lots to access.
40. Streets within the property shall be private streets with public access easements and public utility easements. All private streets parcels shall have a public access easement over the entire width and length of the parcel, and shall encompass the roadway, shoulders, and all sidewalks as part of the roadway sections. All proposed publicly accessible park space (as provided for in the Precise Plan and tentative map), bike and pedestrian paths, and trails for the project shall also have a public access easement over their areas.
41. The existing sidewalk along Callan Blvd. shall be repaired to prolong its life and eliminate tripping hazards as needed.
42. Applicant shall widen the existing sidewalk on Callan Blvd. at three locations along the 740’ frontage. This will create three passing zones approximately 8’ long with a width of 5’, at locations to be determined during site improvement permit plan check.
43. Applicant shall provide a treated lumber retaining wall along the hillside adjacent to the sidewalk on an as-needed basis to reduce sloughing of soil onto the sidewalk. The length of retaining wall that will be needed is estimated at approximately 50% of the 740’ sidewalk.
44. The improvements described above will be completed as each building on parcel fronting Callan Blvd. (parcels B, C and D) is built. City and Applicant shall enter into the City’s standard landscape maintenance agreement to include the lumber retaining wall if placed within the City’s right-of-way on Callan Blvd., which will be recorded against the property fronting the improvements.
45. Curb ramps in and around the project site shall utilize the case types in the Caltrans Standard Plans.
46. Design of the pavement sections shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The design shall comply with City Standard Detail S-1.
47. Pavement design for Serramonte Blvd. shall be per a TI = 9 or shall match existing pavement section, whichever is more stringent.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 27 of 38
48. Final striping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer as part of the Site Improvement Permit.
49. Plans prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer shall be provided for the striping improvements along Campus Drive, Hickey Boulevard, and at the following intersections: Highway 1 ramps/Serramonte Boulevard, Skyline Boulevard/Hickey Boulevard, Callan Boulevard/Hickey Boulevard.
50. Radius of curves shall be clearly shown on the plans for all proposed streets.
GRADING
51. WDID number shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit for any project greater than one acre in size.
52. Grading exceeding 50 cubic yards shall require approval of plans and a grading permit. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the grading plans and erosion control plan in conformance with a soil report prepared by a licensed soil engineer or qualified civil engineer in compliance with the NPDES requirements prior to any development on the property.
53. Grading plans shall be reviewed by an independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist as well as the City Engineer; a letter of compliance from the independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist shall be provided to Engineering prior to the issuance of any permit. The Engineer and/or Geologist, of record, shall be present on-site during the excavation and grading phases of the project and shall submit a written certification that the project civil plans has been implemented as approved.
54. The applicant’s grading and storm drainage improvements shall be designed per best practice engineering standards and provide fail-safe conditions for catastrophic events such as 100- year storms, system overflows or failures. Drainage swales shall be provided at the top, intermediate and bottom of: (1) new slopes and new embankments; and (2) existing slopes and existing embankments where grading will occur, to prevent erosion and degradation of slopes. The project geotechnical report shall include appropriate recommendations regarding the protection of existing and proposed slopes.
55. The soils report shall be finalized and resubmitted prior to any parcel or final map approval, and prior to building permit issuance. The preliminary soils report dated April 20, 2021 indicates that the “east slope has the potential for significant permanent displacements under the considered earthquake loads and could adversely undermine portions of the proposed structure foundations on Parcels B, C, and D.” As required by the engineering division, the applicant shall be responsible for the costs associated with a third-party peer review of soils reports provided for buildings or subdivision, and the applicant’s soils engineer shall address and incorporate the recommendations of the third-party peer review. Prior to subdivision improvement or building permit issuance, the applicant’s soils engineer shall provide a letter stating that they have reviewed such plans and the plans incorporate the recommendations contained in their report.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 28 of 38
STORM WATER/UTILITY
56. Runoff calculations shall be provided verifying that post development stormwater runoff from the site does not exceed the pre-development stormwater runoff. Additional stormwater runoff generated from the design storm as a result of this development shall be retained onsite.
57. Drainage from the site to a public storm drain system or street shall not exceed existing flows over sidewalks in the public right-of-way. On site drainage retention shall be provided to limit the flow rate entering the City’s storm drain system to the pre-development rate. The retention facility shall accommodate the excess runoff from a storm of 10-year frequency and two-hour duration.
58. All stormwater retention, stormwater treatment, or other stormwater BMP improvements shall be located outside of the public right-of-way and maintained by the property owner. All privately owned and maintained improvements shall be located outside of the public right-ofway. There shall be no private improvements within the public right-of-way.
59. The applicant shall be financially responsible for all project-related storm drainage improvements on- and off-site, as required and approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City Standards, subject to the provisions of the project Development Agreement and applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act.
60. Full trash capture devices approved by the City Engineer shall be installed on the drainage system.
61. Storm drain laterals and mains shall be CCTV’ed at the end of construction. Owner is responsible for providing videos of laterals and mains prior to the City Engineer’s permit signoff/acceptance. It is the owner’s responsibility to make required changes to provide camera access.
62. The applicant shall coordinate review of the on-site sanitary sewer system with the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources (DWWR). The new sewer mains shall require CCTV inspection by DWWR.
63. The applicant shall contribute a fair-share cost of the new 30-inch relief sewer crossing I-280.
The fair share contribution shall be based on the added flows relative to the additional capacity needed for the new I-280 crossing as determined by the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources and consistent with applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act.
64. Post-development storm runoff discharged shall be discharged a rate and volume less than or equal to the pre‐development runoff rate and volume and supported by satisfactory hydraulic calculations along with a letter from the engineer of record indicating that the proposed storm drain system does not increase runoff above the pre‐development condition for the entirety of the project site. Individual phases shall not increase runoff rate above the pre-development condition for the entirety of the project site at any time. The hydraulic calculations and letter shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of each set
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 29 of 38 of Improvement Plans. The master plan’s on-site drainage system shall be designed to limit runoff volumes to those during a ten-year frequency storm, to the extent feasible and limited to areas where not otherwise unsupported by an approved Geotechnical report or environmental document, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division.
65. At no point or particular during Master Plan development will the peak flow or volume exceed pre-project conditions at any point on the site perimeter where flow enters the City system.
A particular phase may overcompensate but will not cause the Master Plan to undercompensate at any time. Phased retention systems will be subject to review by the Engineering Division of Public Works and may require each project to enter into a stormwater retention agreement that will be recorded against the property.
66. Regardless of how the project is phased, at no point shall the project peak runoff exceed the pre-project peak runoff.
67. The existing City-owned stormwater system shall be modeled/analyzed during each phase and that private connections to the City’s storm drain system will not result in capacity exceedances of the design-year storm from the Project site. Any public stormwater improvements or capacity increase shall be borne by the developer in accordance with City standards and applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act. As part of the analysis, investigate how the water outflows when all site drainage is plugged and provide the water elevation in relation to the lowest finished building grade.
TRAFFIC
68. Recommendations from the project Development Agreement shall be implemented by the applicant.
69. Final layout for Serramonte Blvd. and the Serramonte Blvd./Highway 1 on/off-ramp intersection shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
70. The restriping and timing of the signalization at the Hickey Blvd/Callan Blvd. intersection will be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy/Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the first housing project to be built.
MAPPING
71. All ROW dedication/easement (public and private) language shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
72. The width and locations of Public Easements shall be specified for review and approval by all utility companies and the City Engineer.
PERMIT
73. An encroachment permit shall be required to be issued by the Public Works Department for all work proposed within the public right-of-way.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 30 of 38
74. The applicant shall provide verification, in writing, that the joint trench design has been reviewed and approved by each utility company.
PARCEL B DEVELOPMENT
GENERAL
75. All improvements shall be consistent with the plans approved by the City Engineer and the Conditions of Approval. All improvements shall meet the latest California Building Code, California Fire Code, Daly City Municipal Code, and the City Standards and Specifications, except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement.
76. Provide “will serve letters” from the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for gas and electric services.
77. All improvements shall be installed, inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to Engineering sign off for occupancy permits. In addition, as-built record plans of all improvements shall be submitted in a form acceptable to the City Engineer prior to Engineering sign off for occupancy permits.
78. All improvements shall be ADA compliant. Curb ramps in and around the project site shall utilize the case types in the Caltrans Standard Plans.
79. Traffic signalization plans for the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and Highway 1 shall be included in the improvement plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall also obtain all necessary Caltrans permits and approvals.
80. All electrical and telecommunications services shall be provided through underground connections. There shall be no overhead drops. All existing overhead services and supporting poles along the project frontage and/or on the private property shall be removed, at the applicant’s expense.
81. All utility services shall be underground. Said improvements shall conform to City of Daly City and affected Agency’s standards.
82. All plans shall be accompanied by all required calculations and studies including, but not limited to, storm drain, geotechnical, and impact studies to justify design signed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer.
83. Grading and improvement plan review and approval by the City Engineer are required before permit issuance. The improvement plans shall include, but not limited to, details for on-site and off-site improvements for vehicular and pedestrian access, parking, traffic signs and markings, utility service connections, modifications and extensions of the City’s sewer, water, storm drain, safety lighting, landscaping, and other public service facilities.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 31 of 38
84. Securities for all improvements (on-site and off-site), and applicable fees and charges, shall be submitted with any site/building permits. The applicant shall obtain all required permits before commencing work.
85. The applicant and/or Contractor shall have a project sign with a 24-hour Project contact information for public concerns such as off-site tracking, dust control, noise complaints, ground shaking and any related construction activities. The complaints and responses shall be logged, and copies provided to the City Engineer with action status on a weekly basis.
86. Provide erosion and storm water pollution plan incorporating best management practices, including operation and maintenance provisions per the requirements applicable at the time of construction permit application. During the wet/rainy season (October 1 to April 30) the developer shall submit a revised erosion control plan as necessary (every five working days) or as required by the City Engineer and/or his representative.
87. Concurrent with each demolition, grading and drainage permit submittal or as a part of the Improvement Plan package, the Applicant shall prepare a dust control plan. The plan shall conform to the City Standards and comply with the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Best Management Practices for dust control. The Applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.
88. Except as permitted in the project's Precise Plan, no permanent building encroachment including but not limited to: awnings, canopies, marquees, signs, windows, balconies, architectural features and mechanical equipment shall be allowed in the Right-of-Way without the written authorization of the City Engineer.
89. The project’s electrical transformer shall not be installed within the public right-of-way.
90. Phasing for the development of the JUHSD Serramonte Del Rey site shall follow the Development Agreement between the City and JUHSD.
91. A current title report shall be submitted with the development of each phase/parcel.
92. Prior to requesting City Council approval for any Parcel Map or Final Map, all subdivision improvements as shown on approved subdivision improvement plans shall be constructed by the applicant and accepted by the City Engineer, or the applicant shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City incorporating those subdivision improvement plans and providing required bonds to secure the completion of the subdivision improvements within the time limits specified by the City. If any final map is part of a phased subdivision, only the final map and subdivision improvement plans for subdivision improvements necessary to serve the proposed phase are required to be submitted to the City for review and approval, and subsequently constructed.
93. The improvements shall be consistent with the plans approved by, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Conditions of Approval. All construction shall meet the latest
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 32 of 38 California Building Code, California Fire Code, Daly City Municipal Code and the City Standard Specifications and Drawings, except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement. Securities for all required improvements, and applicable fees and charges, shall be submitted prior to permit issuance, and/or submission of the subdivision improvement agreement for approval. The applicant shall obtain all required permits before commencing work. All required improvements shall be constructed at no cost to the City except where specifically agreed to by the City under the provisions of a written agreement, including without limitation the project Development Agreement. Grading and improvement plan review and approval by the City Engineer are required before any City Permit is issued.
The improvement plans shall include details for on‐site and off‐site improvements for vehicular and pedestrian access, parking, traffic signs and markings, utility service connections, modifications and extension of the City’s sewer, water, storm drain, safety lighting, landscaping, and other public service and common facilities. All utility services shall be underground unless otherwise approved. Said improvements shall conform to Daly City and affected Agency’s standards, Plans shall be accompanied by all required calculations and studies including geotechnical and impact studies to justify design.
94. Except to the extent otherwise provided by the project Development Agreement and the Precise Plan, the applicant shall comply with the applicable requirements of the “City of Daly City General Conditions of Approval: Use Permits, Variances, Design Reviews, Planned Developments, and Subdivisions”, in effect at the time of subdivision and design review application submittal, final map submittal and/or at the time of building permit application.
95. Homeowners Association (HOA) agreements to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. This includes, but is not limited to, details regarding street sweeping, street maintenance, streetlight maintenance, landscape maintenance, private storm drain maintenance, etc.
96. The Applicant shall design and construct the traffic signal and certain bicycle and pedestrian improvements at the Highway 1 Ramps/Serramonte Boulevard intersection.
97. Haul route to the project site shall be from the Highway 1 off-ramp, across the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and the Highway 1 on/off-ramps, to Entry Dr. Haul route from the project site shall be from Entry Dr., across the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and the Highway 1 on/off-ramps, to the Highway 1 on-ramp. No trucks shall be allowed on Serramonte Blvd. outside of the intersection with Entry Dr., and no other City streets aside from Hickey Blvd. shall be used as a truck route.
SITE
98. The applicant shall repair and/or replace additional areas of street pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter, street lights, manhole, catch basins, or any other public infrastructure within the right-of-way damaged by construction activities associated with the project (utility installation, etc.) as required by the City Inspector during construction. Such repair shall be per the City’s Standards and Specifications.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 33 of 38
99. Bike parking for each phase shall be at street level and shall not require travel across the parking lot to access.
100. Streets within the property shall be private streets with public access easements and public utility easements. All private streets parcels shall have a public access easement over the entire width and length of the parcel, and shall encompass the roadway, shoulders, and all sidewalks as part of the roadway sections. All proposed publicly accessible park space (as provided for in the Precise Plan and tentative map), bike and pedestrian paths, and trails for the project shall also have a public access easement over their areas. 101. The existing sidewalk along Callan Blvd. shall be repaired to prolong its life and eliminate tripping hazards as needed.
102. Applicant shall widen the existing sidewalk on Callan Blvd. at three locations along the 740’ frontage. This will create three passing zones approximately 8’ long with a width of 5’, at locations to be determined during site improvement permit plan check. 103. Applicant shall provide a treated lumber retaining wall along the hillside adjacent to the sidewalk on an as-needed basis to reduce sloughing of soil onto the sidewalk. The length of retaining wall that will be needed is estimated at approximately 50% of the 740’ sidewalk. 104. The improvements described above will be completed as each building on parcel fronting Callan Blvd. (parcels B, C and D) is built. City and Applicant shall enter into the City’s standard landscape maintenance agreement to include the lumber retaining wall if placed within the City’s right-of-way on Callan Blvd., which will be recorded against the property fronting the improvements.
105. The developer shall construct pavement improvements within the boundaries of the intersection of Serramonte Blvd. and Entry Dr. (Highway 1 on/off-ramps). 106. Design of the pavement sections shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The design shall comply with City Standard Detail S-1.
107. Pavement design for Serramonte Blvd. shall be per a TI = 9 or shall match existing pavement section, whichever is more stringent.
GRADING
108. WDID number shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit for any project greater than one acre in size.
109. Grading exceeding 50 cubic yards shall require approval of plans and a grading permit. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the grading plans and erosion control plan in conformance with a soil report prepared by a licensed soil engineer or qualified civil engineer in compliance with the NPDES requirements prior to any development on the property.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 34 of 38 110. Grading plans shall be reviewed by an independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist as well as the City Engineer; a letter of compliance from the independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist shall be provided to Engineering prior to the issuance of any permit. The Engineer and/or Geologist, of record, shall be present on-site during the excavation and grading phases of the project and shall submit a written certification that the project civil plans has been implemented as approved.
111. The applicant’s grading and storm drainage improvements shall be designed per best practice engineering standards and provide fail-safe conditions for catastrophic events such as 100- year storms, system overflows or failures. Drainage swales shall be provided at the top, intermediate and bottom of (1) new slopes and new embankments; and (2) existing slopes and existing embankments where grading will occur, to prevent erosion and degradation of slopes.
The project geotechnical report shall include appropriate recommendations regarding the protection of existing and proposed slopes
112. The soils report shall be finalized and resubmitted prior to any parcel or final map approval, and prior to building permit issuance. The preliminary soils report dated April 20, 2021 indicates that the “east slope has the potential for significant permanent displacements under the considered earthquake loads and could adversely undermine portions of the proposed structure foundations on Parcels B, C, and D.” As required by the engineering division, the applicant shall be responsible for the costs associated with a third party peer review of soils reports provided for buildings or subdivision, and the applicant’s soils engineer shall address and incorporate the recommendations of the third party peer review. Prior to subdivision improvement or building permit issuance, the applicant’s soils engineer shall provide a letter stating that they have reviewed such plans and the plans incorporate the recommendations contained in their report.
STORM WATER/UTILITY
113. Runoff calculations shall be provided verifying that post development stormwater runoff from the site does not exceed the pre-development stormwater runoff. Additional stormwater runoff generated from the design storm as a result of this development shall be retained onsite. 114. Drainage from the site to a public storm drain system or street shall not exceed existing flows over sidewalks in the public right-of-way. On site drainage retention shall be provided to limit the flow rate entering the City’s storm drain system to the pre-development rate. The retention facility shall accommodate the excess runoff from a storm of 10-year frequency and two-hour duration.
115. All stormwater retention, stormwater treatment, or other stormwater BMP improvements shall be located outside of the public right-of-way and maintained by the property owner. All privately owned and maintained improvements shall be located outside of the public right-ofway. There shall be no private improvements within the public right-of-way. 116. The applicant shall be financially responsible for all project-related storm drainage improvements on- and off-site, as required and approved by the City Engineer in accordance
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 35 of 38 with City Standards,, subject to the provisions of the project Development Agreement and applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act.
117. Full trash capture devices approved by the City Engineer shall be installed on the drainage system.
118. Storm drain laterals and mains shall be CCTV’ed at the end of construction. Owner is responsible for providing videos of laterals and mains prior to the City Engineer’s permit signoff/acceptance. It is the owner’s responsibility to make required changes to provide camera access.
119. The applicant shall coordinate review of the on-site sanitary sewer system with the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources (DWWR). The new sewer mains shall require CCTV inspection by DWWR.
120. The applicant shall contribute a fair-share cost of the new 30-inch relief sewer crossing I-280.
The fair share contribution shall be based on the added flows relative to the additional capacity needed for the new I-280 crossing as determined by the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources and consistent with applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act. 121. Post-development storm runoff discharged shall be discharged a rate and volume less than or equal to the pre‐development runoff rate and volume and supported by satisfactory hydraulic calculations along with a letter from the engineer of record indicating that the proposed storm drain system does not increase runoff above the pre‐development condition for the entirety of the project site. Individual phases shall not increase runoff rate above the pre-development condition for the entirety of the project site at any time. The hydraulic calculations and letter shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of each set of Improvement Plans. The master plan’s on-site drainage system shall be designed to limit runoff volumes to those during a ten-year frequency storm, to the extent feasible and limited to areas where not otherwise unsupported by an approved Geotechnical report or environmental document, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division. 122. The existing City-owned stormwater system shall be modeled/analyzed, and that private connections to the City’s storm drain system will not result in capacity exceedances of the design-year storm. Any public stormwater improvements or capacity increase shall be borne by the developer in accordance with City standards, and applicable law, including the Mitigation Fee Act. As part of the analysis, investigate how the water outflows when all site drainage is plugged and provide the water elevation in relation to the finished building grade.
TRAFFIC
123. Recommendations from the project Development Agreement shall be implemented by the applicant.
124. The restriping and timing of the signalization at the Hickey Blvd/Callan Blvd. intersection will be completed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy/Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 36 of 38
MAPPING
125. All ROW dedication/easement language shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
126. The width and locations of Public Easements shall be specified for review and approval by all utility companies and the City Engineer.
PERMIT
127. An encroachment permit shall be required to be issued by the Public Works Department for all work proposed within the public right-of-way.
128. The applicant shall provide verification, in writing, that the joint trench design has been reviewed and approved by each utility company.
C. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND WASTEWATER RESOURCES
129. The project is within the I280 drainage basin which is deficient in capacity. A project is in the planning stages to increase capacity. The Serramonte Del Rey Development shall pay its fair share cost in in the I280 Sewer Capacity Project. Until they determine exactly what they will construct, we cannot provide the exact dollar amount for their contribution. 130. The water and sewer systems, both public and private, shall be constructed per the Daly City Standard Specifications and Drawings and be constructed as if it were public infrastructure. 131. All costs associated with any water and sewer improvements, relocations and abandonments, as a result of this project, shall be borne by the developer. 132. If the project changes form, additional water and sewer studies may, at DWWR’s discretion, be required, and all costs for any required studies shall be at the cost of the developer.
D. NORTH COUNTY FIRE AUTHROITY / DALY CITY FIRE DEPARMENT 133. Comply with California Fire & Building Codes, as well as the Daly City Municipal Code, specifically regarding fire apparatus access and Emergency Escape & Rescue Opening (EERO) requirements.
134. Fire sprinkler systems required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit. 135. Provide fire flow information per CFC, Appendix B. 136. Fire extinguishing/hood system may be required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.
137. Monitored fire alarm systems required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 37 of 38 138. Key Boxes are required. Visit KnoxBox.com for appliances. 139. Portable fire extinguishers(s) are required. Mount fire extinguishers 3-5 feet above floor. 140. Illuminated address identification is required.
141. Utility identification is required.
142. Doors shall be easily openable in one motion without special knowledge, key or effort per CBC. Use of thumb operated deadbolts prohibited unless integrated with latch. 143. Illuminated exit signs and emergency egress illumination is required. 144. Hazardous material use, storage, or operations permit may be required. 145. Ensure Emergency Responder Radio Coverage is provided as required by Fire Code Section 510 and San Mateo County Fire Chief’s Policy.
146. Elevators must be designed to accommodate EMS gurneys. 147. Fire Department Air Supply System may be required. 148. The proposed location of equipment required for Fire Service use (i.e. smoke control, fire service control room, fire alarm panels, etc.) must be reviewed and approved by NCFA. 149. An Emergency Plan and signage must be reviewed and approved by NCFA prior to occupancy.
Staff Recommendation
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Approve General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998 to change the General Plan designation from Residential – High Density (R-HD) and Commercial – Office (C-O) to Commercial – Mixed Use (C-MU);
2. Approve Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, to subdivide the project site into six development parcels and additional street parcels with public access easements
3. Approve Design Review for the site and building design for the proposed development and site improvements on Parcel B;
4. Adopt the Water Supply Assessment prepared for the project;
5. Certify the Final Environmental Impact Report and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program for the project;
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-04-21-14998, Planned Development PD-04-21-14997, Major Subdivision SUB-04-21-14999, and Design Review DR-04-21-15000 – January 22, 2024 Serramonte Del Rey Campus Redevelopment (JUHSD) - 699 Serramonte Boulevard Page 38 of 38
6. Waive first reading and adopt urgency ordinance approving Planned Development PD-04- 21-14997, rezoning project site from Planned Development PD-31 and Planned Development 31A to a new Planned Development PD-31B. In the alternative, the City Council may make a motion for the City Attorney to read by title only and introduce the ordinance approving Planning Development PD-31B; and
7. Waive first reading and adopt urgency ordinance approving the Development Agreement for the project. In the alternative should the urgency not be approved; the City Council may make a motion for the City Attorney to read by title only and introduce the ordinance approving the Development Agreement.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Council members.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Van Lonkhuysen Tatum Mothershead
Planning Manager Director of Economic and Community
Development
Attachments
Attachment A – Location Map
Attachment B – Draft Precise Plan
Attachment C – Serramonte Del Rey Draft Development Agreement Summary Attachment D – Proposed Draft Development Agreement
Attachment E – Design Review Submittal for Parcel B
Attachment F – Tentative Subdivision Map
Attachment G – Draft Planned Development 31B Regulations Attachment H – Letter from Hanson Bridgett Regarding Project RHNA Implications Attachment I – Office Market Assessment and Fiscal Impact Review Attachment J – Water Supply Assessment
Attachment K – Final Environmental Impact Report
Attachment L – Mitigation and Monitoring Program
Serramonte Del Rey Campus
699 Serramonte Blvd, Daly City
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan
01-11-2024
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Table of Contents
A
1. Introduction1
A. Overview1
B. District Intent3
C. Physical Setting4
D. Planning Context7
2. Vision and Goals9
A. Vision9
B. Plan Goals 15
3. Objective Development Standards 19
A. Land Use and Urban Design 19
B. Architectural Design 37
C. Parking and Loading 43
D. Open Space 47
E. Landscape Design 49
F. Signage 53
G. Lighting 57
H. Definitions 60
4. Circulation 63
A. Street Network 63
B. Mobility 68
Table of Contents
B Table of Contents Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan
5. Parks and Open Space 73
A. Landscape Design Concept 73
B. Neighborhood Park and Open Spaces 75
C. Planting Plan 80
6. Utilities 83
A. Stormwater 83
B. Sanitary Sewer 86
C. Water Supply 87
D. Dry Utilities 87
7. Implementation 89
A. Maintenance 89
B. Phasing 91
C. Conformance Review 94
D. Plan Amendments 99
E. Subdivisions 99
F. Inclusionary Housing 99
G. California Environmental Quality Act 100
H. Entitlement Documents 100
Appendices
Appendix A: Conformance Review Checklist 103
Appendix B: Compliance Review - Example Projects 129
Appendix C: See separately attached “Appendix C: Precise Plan Civil Engineering Exhibits” Acknowledgements 135
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Table of Contents
C
Figure 1.1 Existing and Updated Plan Area Boundaries3
Figure 1.2 Regional Location (looking north)5
Figure 1.3 Context Map (looking south)5
Figure 1.4 Existing Conditions and Topography6
Figure 2.1 Illustrative Plan 13
Figure 3.1 Parcelization Plan 21
Figure 3.2 Precise Plan Land Uses 22
Figure 3.3 Building Heights 30
Figure 3.4 Street Frontage 32
Figure 3.5 Ground Floor Use 35
Figure 3.6 Podium Level and Skyline Level Massing 39
Figure 3.7 Façade Modulation 40
Figure 3.8 Lighting Diagram 58
Figure 4.1 Street Hierarchy 64
Figure 4.2 Entry Drive and Retail Plaza 65
Figure 4.3 Plaza/Park Entry at North Drive 66
Figure 4.4 East Drive 66
Figure 4.5 West Drive 67
Figure 4.6 Vehicle Circulation 69
Figure 4.7 Bicycle Circulation 71
Figure 5.1 Urban Forest Concept Plan 74
List of Figures and Tables
D Table of Contents Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan
Table 3.1 - Permitted Uses 23
Table 3.2 - Uses Permitted with a Use Permit 25
Table 3.3 - Prohibited Uses 25
Table 3.4 - Permitted Density By Parcel 27
Table 3.5 - Anticipated Development 28
Table 3.6 - Location of Build-to-Line for Parcels 33
Table 3.7 - Setbacks 37
Table 5.1 - Recommended Tree Species for Public Streets and Open Spaces within the Precise Plan 82 Table 7.1 - Anticipated Phasing of Private Streets and Private and Publicly Accessible Park and Open Space Improvements Required by Development Parcel 93 Table 7.2 - Reviewer Responsibilities 98
Central Green Plan 75
Overlook Park Rendering 76
Overlook Park Plan 76
Entry Drive Plaza Plan 77
South Point Park Plan 78
Westside Walking Trail Section 79
Eastside Recreational Trail Section 79
Figure 5.2 Planting Plan 81
Figure 7.1 Phasing 92
Figure 7.2 Conformance Review and Approval Process 96
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 1: Introduction 1 A. OVERVIEW
The Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan (Precise Plan) will enable the Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD) to transform their existing outdated high school facilities into a new walkable, bikeable and family-friendly residential neighborhood with retail, park, Head Start, and surrounding recreational trail improvements. In addition to the 122 units of faculty and staff housing already completed, the Precise Plan envisions development of up to 1,113 units of affordable and market rate rental housing on leased District lands to be built-out over a multi-year period. The Serramonte Del Rey neighborhood will be an inviting and family friendly place to walk, shop, connect with friends, meet for coffee, or stroll through the park and hillside open spaces.
An example of an open space similar to the proposed Central Green in the Serramonte Del Rey neighborhood.
1. Introduction
2 Chapter 1: Introduction Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan The Precise Plan update focuses on the 22-acre
Phase II area of the 1985 Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan (PD-31). The Phase II area is the location of the existing JUHSD school facilities currently
used for District office space, as well as 122 units
of multi-family faculty and staff rental housing
approved as PD- 31A which was completed in
2022. Phase I of the 1985 Precise Plan is already
built-out with multi-family rental housing, office,
and educational uses. See Figure 1.1.
The Precise Plan identifies the vision, goals,
and objective design standards for individual
development proposals on a parcel basis, as
well as park, open space, street, and utility
infrastructure improvements associated with
development by phase. The development of the
neighborhood is guided by a parcelization plan,
comprised of streets, development parcels and
access easements, that set the walkable scale
of the neighborhood. The administration and
implementation section provides guidance to
developers and Daly City staff on the Precise Plan
conformance review and design review approval
process consistent with the City’s General Plan,
ordinances, and procedures.
The entry to the neighborhood will be a lively and welcoming place.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 1: Introduction 3 B. DISTRICT INTENT
The JUHSD School Board seeks to build upon their
past success and advance an innovative plan to stabilize District finances and fund the future of student education. To accomplish this the District plans to
attract investment and leverage the development
of rental housing through long-term ground leases
and/or joint venture agreements on District lands in
the Precise Plan Area. The District’s key intent is to
stabilize education funding and improve the quality
of life for students, neighbors, and the City. Improving the quality of education at District schools will boost neighborhood property values, as will the development of new neighborhood character that will serve retail, community, park, and recreation facilities. New housing will increase City tax revenues.
The Faculty and Staff Housing project along Serramonte Boulevard, completed in 2022, is the first step to build-out the Serramonte Del Rey neighborhood.
This project provides affordable housing for teachers
and staff members, which helps attract and retain
highly qualified teachers and staff, as well as build
collaborative relationships among teachers, students,
and the broader community they serve.
Figure 1.1 Existing and Updated Plan Area Boundaries
280
Callan Blvd.
Cam
pus Dr.
Hickey Blvd.
Highgate Dr.
Gellert Blvd.
Callan Blvd. Serramonte Blvd.
South Gate Ave.
Serramonte Blvd. Serramonte Blvd.
St. Francis Blvd. St. Francis Blvd.
0 400’ 800’
NORTH
4 Chapter 1: Introduction Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan View of Faculty and Staff Housing from Serramaonte Boulevard.
C. PHYSICAL SETTING
The Serramonte Del Rey site (referred to as the Plan Area in this document) is owned by the Jefferson Union High School District (JUHSD). The 22-acre Plan Area is in the southern portion of Daly City with significant frontage along Serramonte Boulevard and Callan Boulevard with access to Highway 1 along the northern edge of the site. This unique location is a gateway into Daly City. Figure 1.2 shows the regional location and Figure 1.3 shows the surrounding context of the Plan Area.
Adjacent Land Uses
A variety of residential and retail uses are located within a quarter mile (five-minute walking distance) from the
Plan Area. Direct access to Serramonte Boulevard and
Hickey Boulevard connects the Plan Area to many existing community destinations that surround the project site.
Destinations include the Serramonte Shopping Center,
Serramonte Plaza, Gellert Park, and Serramonte Library, as well as adjacent neighborhoods and schools. The existing site is surrounded by high density rental apartments on the north and south sides, low density residential on
the west side, Chinese Cemetery and Gellert Park on the east side. The project site is centrally located within the Jefferson Union High School District with JUHSD schools located north and south of the site.
Site Access
As seen in Figure 1.3, the Plan Area is connected to major arterials, including Highway 1, Interstate 280, and State Route 35 (Skyline Boulevard). The site is also accessible by public transit: the Colma and South San Francisco BART
stations are both approximately two miles away from the project site, and there is an existing SamTrans bus stop serving Route 120 at the project entry along Serramonte Boulevard. In addition, many surrounding streets have
bicycle facilities, including Class II bicycle lanes on SerPage 284 of 1426 Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Figure 1.2 Regional Location (looking north)
Figure 1.3 Context Map (looking south)
ramonte Boulevard south of Callan Boulevard, Callan Boulevard south of Serramonte Boulevard, and Class III bicycle facilities on Serramonte Boulevard west of Callan Boulevard.
Plan Area Character
As shown in Figure 1.4, the existing Plan Area site is a level plateau on an east-facing slope. It is at a higher elevation than the land to the east of Callan Boulevard, and at a lower elevation than the residential neighborhood to the west along St. Francis Boulevard. Because of the site’s orientation and high elevation, there are expansive views of the San Bruno Mountains and city skyline to the east and north. Farther to the west is a ridge separating the Plan Area from the Pacific Ocean, providing a temperate marine climate to the Plan Area and surroundings. The site is framed on its eastern and western sides by sloping hillsides with dense evergreen trees. These forested areas, along with the change in grade, create a buffer from developed areas on the west, north and east sides of the Plan Area.
The Plan Area is occupied by 122 units of faculty and staff housing at Parcel A and a decommissioned high school building, partially used as administrative offices. The former high school facility is a large, contiguous single-story building with mostly blank walls facing its surroundings. It needs significant seismic upgrades to the structure. The site itself is clean, flat and of a sufficient size to accommodate a new neighborhood.
6 Chapter 1: Introduction Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Figure 1.4 Existing Conditions and Topography
St. Francis Blv
d.
Callan Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Campus Dr.
Jefferson Union High
School District
Parcel A
(65 M 68-69)
APN 091-211-230
Acreage: 22.3 acres
Serramonte Ridge
Apartments
Summit Shasta
Charter High School
JUHSD Faculty &
Staff Housing
Izzi Early
Education
SamTrans Bus Stop (Typ.)
Bus Line
Bus Line
Bus Line
Bus Line
120 24
121
121
120 24
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 1: Introduction 7 D. PLANNING CONTEXT
Daly City General Plan 2030
The Precise Plan update is consistent with the goals and policies of the 2030 Daly City General Plan (amended with the 2015 Housing Element) and the latest draft of the
2023-2031 Housing Element.
Faculty and Staff Housing
On Parcel A is a 122-unit housing project built for and occupied by JUHSD faculty and staff, completed in 2022
and zoned Planned Development PD-31A. The Faculty
and Staff housing was entitled under the PD-31 Precise
Plan by General Plan Amendment GPA-9-18-13666 and
Zone Change ZC-9-18-13662.
Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
One of the City’s housing goals is to encourage the
development of housing that is affordable to both renters and owners, and for households of all income levels. The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance identifies requirements
for the provision of affordable housing as part of new
housing development in the City. The residential development within the Plan Area will provide affordable housing as required by ordinance and per the Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Development Agreement and Affordable
Housing Agreement.
Municipal Ordinance
The Daly City Municipal Code designates the Plan Area as a “Planned Development District (PD-31B)”. A Planned Development district allows various types of development such as neighborhood shopping centers, professional and administrative areas, commercial service centers, industrial parks, single-family, multi-family residential, or a combination of any of the above-mentioned uses.
Uses in a planned development district shall be permitted based on the general category of uses identified in the Precise Plan. General provisions for a planned development that apply to the Precise Plan are established in Section 17.28.020 of the Municipal Code.
1985 Precise Plan (PD-31)
The 1985 Precise Plan extends from Hickey Boulevard at the south to Serramonte Boulevard at the north. The 1985 Precise Plan envisioned two phases of development with the closure of the Jefferson Union High School. The first phase of housing, office and Summit Shasta Charter High School was developed south of the existing high school. The remainder of the 22-acre second phase of permitted development of the 1985 Precise Plan has not been realized and is the subject of this Precise Plan Update.
The provisions of the 1985 Precise Plan continue to govern the southern part of the PD31 Precise Plan.
8 Chapter 1: Introduction Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan This page intentionally left blank.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 2: Vision and Goals 9 A. VISION
Experience
The Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan enables the transformation of a 22-acre, former high school site with outdated facilities and surface parking to become the home of
future residents who will experience:
● A new walkable, bikeable and family-friendly residential neighborhood with tree-lined streets; ● The convenience and activity of local retail and café life;
● A collection of parks, open spaces and recreational
trails for use by all ages;
● Architecture for modern living, with amenities and
contemporary, sustainable design;
Walkable tree-lined streets will enhance the neighborhood.
2. Vision and Goals
10 Chapter 2: Vision and Goals Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan ● A diverse residential neighborhood that includes units affordable to low and very low income levels;
● Access “a moment away” to Daly City’s coastal bluffs
overlooking the Pacific Ocean from Highway 1 and
Skyline Boulevard;
● Scenic views to San Bruno Mountain and the San
Francisco Bay;
● A highly accessible location with direct transportation and transit access to major job centers in San Francisco and along the San Mateo Peninsula; ● Regional shopping and Gellert Park within walking
distance
● One of the world’s best climates, with the beautiful, diverse ecology of a coastal zone and a Mediterranean
climate with mild, wet, frostless winters and cool
summers.
Illustrative Plan
Figure 2.1 is an illustrative plan of the build-out of the plan area, featuring neighborhood-serving retail, public gathering spaces and residential development linked together by a network of pedestrian-scale tree-lined streets. Main features of the plan are:
Aerial view of the Plan Area showing proximity to Pacific Ocean.
Open space and recreation areas will serve all age groups.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 2: Vision and Goals 11 Mixed-Use Main Street. Entry Drive is the plan area’s
Main Street and entrance to the neighborhood, extending from the intersection of Serramonte Boulevard and Highway 1 ramps to the Central Green on North Drive.
On the east side of the street is a mixed-use commercial and residential development with ground floor retail
uses. This lively area features uses such as a café and retail shops opening onto tree-lined gathering spaces with
outdoor seating. The activity generated during the days and evenings will provide an attractive and welcoming
environment for residents, visitors, and surrounding
neighbors, visible along Serramonte Boulevard and from
travelers entering and exiting from Highway 1.
Housing Shapes Public Spaces. The streets are lined
with residential buildings organized around the Central Green, an urban park at the heart of the neighborhood.
Buildings vary from four to seven stories around the
Central Green. Up to two 14-story towers are permitted.
The buildings are to be of contemporary, high quality
architectural design. Design standards shape an attractive pedestrian oriented streetscape experience, with attention to ground floor, podium, and tower building massing.
Buildings are designed as courtyard housing, each with an internal landscaped courtyard at grade or above a parking podium. Where a building is adjacent to public Hillside Area open space, the courtyard space opens to connect
to the surrounding open space visually and physically.
Pedestrian-Scale Neighborhood. The Plan Area is
organized into walkable, pedestrian-scale streets and
city blocks, each with a different character. Entry Drive provides a transition from the higher vehicle volumes
on Serramonte Boulevard to quieter neighborhood
streets. North Drive extends east and west along the
Central Green with East Drive and West Drive wrapping
around the Central Green so every street in the plan
is accessible to this neighborhood park. North Drive
and East Drive are local connector streets that prioritize pedestrians and cyclists with protected bike lanes and
large street trees. West Drive is a narrower neighborhood Entry Drive will provide a landscaped entry into the neighborhood.
12 Chapter 2: Vision and Goals Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan street with individual ground floor unit entries or residential stoops. Three access ways provide access to residential parking, Overlook Park, wooded hillside areas, the eastside recreational pedestrian/bike trail and westside walking path. At the south entrance to the Plan Area is a landscaped roundabout providing a traffic-calmed entrance to the neighborhood.
Bike and Transit Access. The neighborhood is safe and convenient for bicycling with connections to existing and planned Daly City bicycle routes to local destinations such as Serramonte Main Branch library, Gellert Park and Serramonte Shopping Center. Transit users have direct access to frequent SamTrans bus service to BART, Skyline College and other city and regional destinations with SamTrans bus stops at the intersection of Serramonte Boulevard and Entry Drive.
Diversity of Housing. Affordable and market rate rental housing are mixed throughout the site. Parcel A’s 122
units of affordable housing for JUHSD Faculty and Staff is approved and constructed, at the corner of Serramonte
Boulevard and Entry Drive. Parcel C proposes up to
1501 units of affordable housing development serving
households with low and very low incomes, including the intellectually disabled.
1 The Plan proposes to build a total of 152 units, including 150 affordable units and 2 units that are manager units in two buildings on Parcel C.
A landscaped roundabout at the south entry will provide a gateway to the neighborhood.
Parking-protected buffered bike lane.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 2: Vision and Goals 13 Figure 2.1 Illustrative Plan
Illustrative Vision
Figure 2.1
St. Fran
cis Blvd.
Cal al n
B
vl d.
Serramonte Blvd.
14 Chapter 2: Vision and Goals Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Urban Parking. Parking for residential and retail uses is “right-sized” based on actual demand. Parking is in secure garages and screened from view from neighborhood
streets by building frontages or landscape. On-street parking on private streets and accessways serves residents, retail customers, visitors and neighborhood public spaces.
Curbside pick-up and drop-off for Head Start is located along South Access Way.
Together, these features shape a walkable, bikeable, safe, family-friendly neighborhood with a shopping street,
parks, and nature trails, with several venues for outdoor gatherings and recreational activities. Development will be built out over time and may not match the illustrative plan precisely.
The Central Green will have a variety of spaces from active to contemplative.
Neighborhood Parks, Trails and Open Space. The plan
features three publicly accessible parks and a loop trail, with walking and biking along the east hillside and walking along the west hillside. The Central Green features a tree-shaded plaza at Entry Drive and a crescent shaped meadow enclosed with oak and evergreen trees. The park is visible and accessible to residents and visitors, with active and contemplative spaces.
Overlook Park, in the northeast corner of the Plan Area, is a children-friendly park with community garden, terraced seating, play, and turf areas for family use. Overlook Park will have filtered views through hillside trees of Daly City, San Bruno Mountain, and the San Francisco Bay. South Point Park, at the southern entrance to the plan area, provides a passive recreational landscape and trail linking the western and eastern hillsides together.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 2: Vision and Goals 15 B. PLAN GOALS
The following goals shaped the master plan and are to
guide development in the Plan Area:
B.1 Create an Active Neighborhood
Redevelop the existing underutilized site into a familyfriendly, cohesive neighborhood with activities that all ages can enjoy, from cafes and retail to recreational trails and parks that can accommodate a range of play and
other activities.
B.2 Promote Housing Equity
Address the housing shortage in Daly City by exceeding
the number of units and depth of affordability required by the City’s below market rate (BMR) rental housing
requirement. At final build-out of the dwelling units
within the Plan Area, not less than 20% of all dwelling units constructed within the Plan Area shall be Affordable Units, with approximately 6.5% of dwelling units leased to Moderate Income households, and 13.5% of all dwelling
units leased to Low Income households. Twelve (12) of
the Low Income household Affordable Units shall be
leased to households with not more than 23% of AMI.
The balance of units will be market rate rental housing on parcels B, D, E and F.
Residential buildings with nearby parks create a family-friendly neighborhood.
Walkable tree-lined streets will enhance the neighborhood.
16 Chapter 2: Vision and Goals Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan The Head Start facility will provide dedicated outdoor activity space.
B.3 Preserve Head Start
Provide a place to relocate the existing Head Start facility currently on the site, to ensure a long-term home on-site for the preschool. Accommodate Head Start’s program
needs for a facility with two classrooms, outdoor play
areas, and parking. The District is committed to supporting Head Start’s effort to fundraise for the buildout of their new facilities.
B.4 Provide Innovative Housing Design
Drawing upon successful projects elsewhere in San Mateo County, accommodate different “types” of buildings,
varying in efficiency, parking configuration, ground floor activity and construction technology. Wrap housing
around courtyards for efficiency and livability to create attractive urban living.
B.5 Promote Sustainability
Ensure a green and healthy environment for families and our community by planning for green buildings with
sustainable, energy efficient and resource conserving
operations and performance. Design and construct
buildings to reduce our carbon footprint and ensure
healthy indoor air quality. Buildings will have roof top solar panels, electric vehicle charging stations, water conservation, waste management, alternative transportation options and green materials that meet or exceed state
and local green building requirements. Landscapes will
feature storm water treatment gardens, drought tolerant landscapes, street trees to reduce heat island effects, and pedestrian-oriented design.
B.6 Fit Hillside Context
Buildings are located in a hillside setting with existing mature trees and supplemental tree planting that will
screen views from Serramonte Boulevard and Callan
Boulevard. Residential towers are set back from Serramonte Boulevard and oriented east-west to reduce visual prominence for uphill neighbors.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 2: Vision and Goals 17 B.7 Provide Active Transportation
Design for active transportation and healthy living.
The Precise Plan’s streets2 are designed for daily
exercise as walkable and bikeable streets. These
“complete streets” advance Daly City’s Vision Zero
program to reduce pedestrian traffic fatalities to
zero.
B.8 Right-size Parking
“Right-size” the supply of parking in relation to
parking demand, based on best planning and
engineering practices used in places similar to Daly
City. Parking can be provided on-site for residents,
guests, and retail customers to avoid “overflow”
parking in nearby neighborhoods. Use Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to ensure adequate parking for all users.
2 See Development Agreement for off-site improvements,
including pedestrian and bike improvements to the Serramonte Boulevard and Highway 1 ramps intersection.
Before view from intersection of Callan Boulevard and Serramonte Boulevard.
After view with trees shown transparent to show new development.
18 Chapter 2: Vision and Goals Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan The open space network will include a recreational trail.
B.9 Connect to Nature
Provide diverse, accessible neighborhood park and open
spaces for residents and visitors to connect to nature. Create recreational trails open to the public, as well as a series of private and common open spaces available to residents.
B.10 Ensure Long-term Financial Stability for
the School District
Plan, design, construct and maintain residential development, park spaces and infrastructure for long-term lease revenues to ensure financial stability of the District.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 19 This chapter establishes Objective Development Standards for the Plan Area. All development planned within the Plan Area are required to adhere to standards for
Planned Development Zone PD-31B as contained in this
chapter. When these Objective Development Standards
conflict with other sections of the Zoning Ordinance,
these standards shall prevail only to the extent of the conflict. Where these planned development standards do
not provide regulations, the Zoning Ordinance1 shall apply as to the most similar land use or standard. Definitions of terms are located at the end of this chapter.
1 The Zoning Ordinance provisions that apply shall be those consistent with the Development Agreement, including without limitation its covenants concerning vested rights and, notwithstanding anything provision herein, nothing in the PD-31 zoning is intended to supersede the Development Agreement.
A. LAND USE AND URBAN DESIGN
This section establishes objective development standards for land use and urban design comprised of parcelization, permitted land use, use permits, prohibited uses, development density, building heights, street frontages, ground floor uses and setbacks.
3. Objective Development Standards
20 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan A.1 Parcelization
The 22-acre Precise Plan Area is subdivided into six development parcels A through F2 organized by a street grid
into six blocks, per Figure 3.1 Parcelization Plan. Publicly accessible private streets are separate parcels.3 Publicly accessible private access easements are as follows:
● Access Drive West between Parcel A and Parcel F
● Access Drive North between Parcel B and Parcel D
● Access Drive South between Parcel C and Parcel D
Parcels can be further subdivided to create lots so long as uses remain consistent with the land use requirements of the Precise Plan and the provisions of the 2023 Daly City subdivision ordinance.
2 And two zero-square-foot lots, C’ and F’ may be expanded during implementation of the project via a lot line adjustment or other administrative process so long as the expanded parcel complies with all development standards in the Precise Plan, including without limitation minimum lot size requirements.
3 For parcels and access easements please see Tentative Map exhibits.
A.2 Permitted Uses
The General Plan Land Use designation for the Precise
Plan Area is Commercial - Mixed Use (C-MU) as shown in
Figure 3.2 Precise Plan Land Uses.
Table 3.1 Permitted Uses establishes uses permitted by
right as part of Planned Development Zone PD-31B.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 21 Figure 3.1 Parcelization Plan
Plan Area Parcels
Figure 2.2
PARCEL A
PARCEL D
PARCEL C
PARCEL B
PARCEL F PARCEL E
Easement
E
ntry
Dr vi e
West Drive
East Drive
North Drive
St. Fran
cis Blvd.
Cal al n
B
vl d.
Serramonte Blvd.
Access Drive West Access Drive North
Access Drive South
Campus Drive
Parcel lines
Note: Lot C’ is zero-square-foot lot within Parcel C and Lot F’ is zero-square-foot lot within Parcel F, see note 3, Table 7.1 for implementation of zero-square foot lots.
22 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Figure 3.2 Precise Plan Land Uses
Plan Area Districts
Figure 3.1
PARCEL A
PARCEL D
PARCEL C
PARCEL B
PARCEL F PARCEL E
Parcel lines Commercial Mixed Use District (C-MU)
Campus Drive
E
ntry
Dr vi e
West Drive
East Drive
North Drive
St. Fran
cis Blvd.
Cal al n
B
vl d.
Serramonte Blvd.
Access Drive West Access Drive North
Access Drive South
Note: Lot C’ is zero-square-foot lot within Parcel C and Lot F’ is zero-square-foot lot within Parcel F, see note 3, Table 7.1 for implementation of zero-square foot lots.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 23 Table 3.1 - Permitted Uses
Residential Uses
Accessory dwelling units as permitted by the California Government Code Apartment buildings meeting the density prescription contained herein Townhouses4
Live work dwelling units5
Commercial Uses6, 7, 8
Athletic clubs and health studios
Assembly uses, including churches, lodges, and social and meeting halls Business and trade schools
Childcare facilities, day care centers, and play gyms
4. Three story walk-up apartment townhouses are permitted as part of a multi-family residential of at least four stories on any parcel. Up to 15 walk-up apartment townhouses are permitted on a single parcel, not to exceed a maximum number of 40 walk-up apartment townhouses for the plan area.
5. Live-work units combine residential and non-residential uses. Live-work units require business owner occupancy of the unit and that no less than 50 percent of the floor area is workspace.
Live-above is permitted, where residential living space is above the workspace, including a separation between the two uses, so that the commercial section can be independently leased out for limited use. Occupants of a live-work unit are required to maintain either a Daly City business license, or a Home Occupation Permit per City code requirements, and as permitted by San Mateo County, such as a microenterprise home kitchen operation. Live-work uses are not included in retail/commercial floor area limits.
6. The uses prescribed in this list shall be permitted when proposed within a building containing residential uses that meet the density prescription identified in this ordinance. They shall not be permitted in freestanding buildings.
7. Other commercial uses not listed here can be permitted at discretion of the Planning Manager.
8. When a use is not specifically listed, it shall be assumed that when the unlisted use is similar to or less objectionable than a permitted use, such use shall be permitted in the district to the same requirements of the most similarly listed use. Otherwise, the use shall be presumed to be not allowed.
24 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Table 3.1 - Permitted Uses
Food sales on a temporary basis, including farmer’s markets and food truck sales where such uses are conducted on hardscape surfaces and do not displace any existing parking space
Offices use including professional office, medical and dental office, and medical clinics Veterinarian offices
Personal service uses, including nail and hair salons, massage businesses where employees are licensed by the State of California Restaurants that do not provide a drive-through window
Retail uses, including retail sales of beer, wine and distilled spirits. Where less than 50 percent of the store stock retail value is such products Seasonal temporary uses (e.g. Christmas store)
Community Service Uses
Community center, library
Public Utility and Public Service Uses
Pumping stations, public utility buildings
(Table Continued)
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 25 A.3 Use Permit
Table 3.2 establishes uses that are permitted with a Use Permit in the PD-31B zone.
A.4 Prohibited Uses
Table 3.3 establishes uses that are not permitted in the PD-31B zone.
Table 3.2 - Uses Permitted with a Use Permit
Use Permit
At the Community Garden at Overlook Park on Parcel B, a Use Permit is required to replace the Community Garden
with park and open space uses, including active and
passive recreation, landscaping and structures incidental to such use. The City shall issue a use permit if the applicant demonstrates substantial evidence the Community Garden is not being substantially utilized, is being misused by any members of the community, or has otherwise
become infeasible to operate.
Table 3.3 - Prohibited Uses
Residential Uses
Single-family attached or detached residential uses, and other similar uses, that do not meet the density prescription contained herein.
Commercial Uses
Retailers where more than 10 percent of the retail value of the store stock are firearms, such as handguns and long guns, in an open shopping format, or firearm parts, or any business that engages in the repair of firearms and/or firearm parts.
Retail sales where 50 percent or more of the store stock retail value is products that are beer, wine, and distilled spirits.
Retailer sales where 50 percent or more of the store stock retail value is products containing tobacco, electronic cigarettes, personal vaporizers, or electronic nicotine delivery systems.
Vehicle or equipment rental and vehicle storage.
Car wash and detailing shops.
Manufacturing uses.
Restaurants and any other uses providing a drive-through window.
Service stations, including operational and physical expansions thereto.
26 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan A.5.4 For the purpose of calculating minimum residential density, land area shall include the building and covered parking area of a parcel not including park, open space, private streets, private accessways, paths and trails, setbacks and hillsides with slopes greater than three percent.
Commercial
A.5.5 Parcels may provide retail/commercial square
footage on the ground floor up to the maximum in Table
3.3, however the total retail/commercial square footage for the overall buildout of the Plan Area is limited to 14,000 sq.ft.
Table 3.4 Permitted Density By Parcel presents the
maximum allowed density per parcel and the minimum
residential density per parcel and the minimum density
for the overall plan area. Calculation of minimum density for the plan area is the sum of net land areas of Parcels B, C, D, E, F and excludes Parcel A. These are maximums by parcel, buildout can be up to these limits.
A.5 Development Density
Residential
A.5.1 Maximum residential units permitted on each parcel are shown in Table 3.3 Permitted Residential Density by Parcel. The sum of the total residential units developed on all parcels A-F shall not exceed 1,235 units. Any two of parcels D, E and F may be developed with high-rise
buildings up to 14 stories up to parcel maximums. There is no maximum residential density in dwelling units/acre.
A.5.2 The minimum residential density for any parcel
shall be 45 dwelling units/acre and minimum density
for the Precise Plan area overall shall be no less than 60 dwelling units per acre.
A.5.3 Minimum lot size shall be 10,000 square feet.9
Minimum lot width shall be 25 feet.
9 The Tentative Map includes Parcels A-F. It also includes, and these development standards authorize, two zero-square-foot lots that allow for the subsequent establishment of developable sub-parcels, providing the parcel developers with flexibility during project buildout (e.g., allowing for separate estates in land, buildings, or portions thereof ). The sub-parcels do not expand the site density beyond maximums established in the Precise Plan. The approval of any sub-parcels shall be processed administratively by City staff (unless exempt under applicable law), and any proposed sub-parcel must comply with all objective development standards in the Precise Plan, including without limitation minimum lot size requirements.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 27 Table 3.4 - Permitted Density By Parcel
Parcel Number Maximum Residential Units
Allowed Per Parcel
Maximum Retail/
Commercial Square Footage Per ParcelMinimum Residential Density or Units Parcel A 122 0 122
Parcel B 210 6,000 sq.ft.
45 DU/AC per parcel
60 DU/AC for the plan area
Parcel C 152 8,000 sq.ft.*
Parcel D 270 8,000 sq.ft.
Parcel E 330 8,000 sq.ft.
Parcel F 400 8,000 sq.ft.
*Parcel C is permitted to build up to 2,800 sq. ft of daycare center facilities within its allotment of retail/commercial square footage.
28 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan The Table 3.5 Anticipated Development summarizes the anticipated number of housing units and square feet of floor area at build-out for each parcel within the Plan Area. These numbers may be less than the total capacity of each site.
Table 3.5 - Anticipated Development
Parcels Area (Acres) Housing Units Retail /
Commercial Other
Parcel A 3.68 122 1,000 sq.ft. (existing Comcast facility) Parcel B 4.26 201 6,000 sq.ft.
Parcel C 1.93 152 ** 2,800 sq.ft. (relocated Head Start facility) Parcel D 2.83 188* **
Parcel E 2.99 290* **
Parcel F 3.99 282* **
Total Development 19.59 1,235 14,000 sq. ft.
Street Parcels within Plan Area*** 2.59
Total Development 22.16 1,235 14,000 sq.ft. 3,800 sq.ft. (*) Denotes parcels with high-rise building potential (up to 14 stories). Only two of these three parcels may be developed with high-rise buildings. This table includes an assumption that Parcel D and Parcel F will be developed with high-rise residential buildings, but during implementation the high-rise location may be transferred to Parcel E from either Parcel D or F. In any case, the overall buildout of the Plan Area is limited to 1,235 residential units. (**) Denotes parcels that may provide retail/commercial square footage on the ground floor in addition to 6,000 sq.ft. assumed for Parcel B. Each of these parcels may or may not build commercial square footage on the ground floor; in any case, the total retail/commercial square footage for the overall buildout of the Plan Area is limited to 14,000 sq.ft. (***) Does not include the 2.59 acres of “Lot 3” on the Tentative Map, comprised of West Drive south of Parcel E, the roundabout, and Campus Drive south to Hickey Boulevard.
Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards 29 A.6 Building Height
Permitted building height for the Plan Area is shown in Figure 3.3 Building Heights. For Parcels A, B, C, D, E and F, the height limit for a podium shall be 90 feet, and for Parcels D, E and F the height limit for a tower shall be 150 feet. Buildings can be any height up to these limits, provided the project meets the minimum density standard set forth herein. Townhouses shall be constructed with a minimum three- story building height. Multi-family buildings shall be constructed with a predominant
building height of a four-story minimum. Stepbacks are
required at 65 feet in height, with locations as shown on Figure 3.3 Building Heights. Exceptions to the height limit are:
A.6.1 Ornamental architectural features, such as turrets, parapets, corner towers, or other accentuating features.
A.6.2 Mechanical and roof-mounted elevator core
equipment up to a maximum of 18 feet above maximum
height, provided their combined coverage does not
exceed 30% of building roof area. Equipment less than
four feet above maximum height is exempt from the
coverage calculation.
A.6.3 Architectural and landscape screening designed to conceal mechanical and roof mounted equipment.
A.6.4 Sustainability elements, such as photovoltaic cells, small-scale wind turbines suitable for residential development, storm water catchment / treatment equipment, solar water heating equipment.
A.6.5 Enclosed amenity spaces to a height of 12 feet
where roof is designed as an accessible outdoor common
area if coverage of enclosed amenity space is no more
than 30 percent of building roof area.
30 Chapter 3: Objective Development Standards Serramonte Del Rey Precise Plan Building Heights Figure 3.3
PARCEL A
90’
PARCEL D
90’/150’
PARCEL C
90’
PARCEL B
90’
PARCEL F
90’/150’
PARCEL E
90’/150’
E
ntry
Dr vi e
W
est Driv
e
East Driv
e
North Drive
St. Fra
n
cis Blvd.
Cal al n
B
vl d.
Serramonte Blvd.
Allowable Height* Step back at 65’
*Allowable height up to 90 feet for podium level and up to 150 feet for residential tower .
Access Drive West Access Drive North
Access Drive South
Parcel lines
Campus Drive
PARCEL A
90’
P
PARCEL F
90’/150’
PARCEL E
90’/150’
Entry
Dr vi e
W
est Driv
e
North Driv
St. Fran
cis Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Allowable Height* Step back at 65’
*Allowable height up to 90 feet for podium level and up to 150 feet for residential tower .
Access Drive West
Parcel lines
Figure 3.3 Building Heights
Building Heights
Figure 3.3
PARCEL A
90’
PARCEL D
90’/150’
PARCEL C
90’
PARCEL B
90’
PARCEL F
90’/150’
PARCEL E
90’/150’
E
ntry
Dr vi e
W
est Driv
e
East Driv
e
North Drive
St. Fran
cis Blvd.
Cal al n
B
vl d.
Serramonte Blvd.
Allowable Height* Step back at 65’
*Allowable height up to 90 feet for podium level and up to 150 feet for residential tower .
Access Drive West Access Drive North
Access Drive South
Parcel lines
Campus Drive