AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC RECORDS:
All public record to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, City Hall located at 333 90th Street, Daly City, CA during normal business hours, at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body.
CITY OF DALY CITY
Regular Meeting - CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
Monday, July 22, 2024 - 7:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers – 2nd Floor
City Hall 333 – 90th Street
Daly City, CA 94015
To watch the live telecast:
https://www.youtube.com/@dalycitygov/streams, https://www.dalycity.org/agendas, or Comcast Ch. 27
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
There are three ways to submit public comments: (1) submit written comments by meeting day, (2) submit written comments during the meeting, and (3) attend the meeting in person.
1. To submit written comments by meeting day, please email [email protected] and include “Public Comment” in the subject line. All written comments received by 4:00 pm on meeting day will be provided to the City Council prior to the meeting.
Please note: Any emailed comments received after 4:00 p.m. on the meeting date are not guaranteed to be received by the City Council prior to the meeting. Comments are not read aloud into the record.
2. During the meeting, you may visit www.dalycity.org/agendas to submit comments using the Public Comment form to address the City Council on a specific item, or during the public comment period, and such comments are delivered to the City Council and City Staff during the meeting, and may be read into the record at the time they are received.
3. To speak at the meeting in person, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber and submit it to a Staff Member as early in the meeting as possible.
Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in attending or participating in this meeting should call the office of the City Clerk at (650) 991-8078 as soon as possible.
CALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE TO THE FLAG:
ROLL CALL:
Agenda – City Council
Monday, July 22, 2024
PRESENTATIONS:
1. Daly City - Izumisano City, Sister Cities - Key to the City Ceremony APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
2. Regular Meeting of July 8, 2024
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
PUBLIC APPEARANCES/ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
NOTE: Speakers are limited to two minutes, unless modified by the Mayor.
The Council cannot take action on any matter raised under this item.
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and may be approved by one roll call vote of the City Council. There shall be no separate discussion of the matters on the Consent Agenda unless requested by a member of the City Council. If discussion is required, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately at the end of the Agenda.
Resolutions:
3. Authorize the City Manager to Execute Construction Contract for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance Facility Roof Project
4. Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment for the Professional Services Agreement for the City of Daly City’s City Facilities – Interior Improvements Project
5. Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. for Project Management Services
6. Appropriate $15,000 of Fund 96 – Bayshore Redevelopment RDA - Fund Balance for Rehabilitation of Vacant Unit and Other Property Improvements at 260 Abbot
7. Approve the Use of Measure Q Funds to Create a Police Department Mental Health Crisis Response Unit
8. Approve the use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase a Polaris Ranger Crew XP1000 Utility Task Vehicle for Use by the Police Department
9. Approve Proposed Revisions of Lead Groundskeeper Gardener Job Specification, and Approve Proposed Title Change and Job Specification Revisions for Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker Job Specification (Civil Service)
10. Adopt Salary Range Reassignment for Specific Executive Management Positions
Agenda – City Council
Monday, July 22, 2024
11. Authorize Temporary Assignment and Reimbursable Compensation of the Co-Interim Executive Director for the San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Care Emergency Medical Services Group (JPA)
END OF CONSENT AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
12. General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard
STAFF: Sam Fielding
RECOMMENDATION: Open/Close Hearing
Motion for City Attorney to Read by Title Only
Councilmember Introduce Ordinance
Adopt Resolution by Roll Call Vote
APPOINTMENTS: Board/Commission Membership Committee Appointments REPORTS:
13. Council Committee
14. City Council
15. Staff
ADJOURNMENT:
CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
JULY 8, 2024
--------------------------------
Note on Public Comments:
To provide public comments, members of the public have the option to- 1) attend in person, 2) email the City Clerk, or 3) submit comments through the public comment portal on the City’s website. Persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids or services in attending or participating in this meeting are instructed to call the office of the City Clerk at 991-8078 prior to the meeting.
Visit https://www.youtube.com/@DalyCityGov/streams to view the City Council meeting The regular meeting was called to order by Mayor Manalo at 7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Present:
Juslyn C. Manalo, Mayor
Pamela DiGiovanni
Teresa G. Proaño
Glenn R. Sylvester
Councilmembers Absent:
Roderick Daus-Magbual, Vice Mayor
Staff Present:
Thomas J. Piccolotti, City Manager
Rose L. Zimmerman, City Attorney
K. Annette Hipona, City Clerk
PRESENTATIONS:
Proclamation - Park and Recreation Month
(Denise Brown, Director of Recreation Services and Recreation Staff) Proclamation – Disability Pride Month
(Ligia Andrade Zuniga, President of the Board, Center for Independence of Individuals with Disabilities) APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Regular Meeting June 24, 2024
It was moved by Councilmember Sylvester, seconded by Councilmember DiGiovanni and carried by unanimous roll call vote to approve the minutes of June 24, 2024, as amended.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
It was moved by Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember DiGiovanni and carried by unanimous roll call vote to approve the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA:
It was moved by Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember Proaño and carried by unanimous roll call vote to approve the consent agenda with the exception of Item 9, which was pulled for discussion.
CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
JULY 8, 2024
2 Resolutions:
Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement and Appropriate grant funds with the Jefferson Elementary School District
Resolution 24-109, Authorizing Execution Of Agreement With Jefferson Elementary School District For The After School Education And Safety Program At MP Brown Elementary School And The Expanded Learning Opportunities Program At Daniel Webster And Majorie H. Tobias Elementary Schools And Fernando Rivera Intermediate School
Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the Brisbane School District Resolution 24-110, Authorizing Execution Of Agreement With Brisbane School District For The Afterschool Youth Recreation Program At Panorama Elementary School Accept and Appropriate $75,000 Cannabis Equity Grant from GO-Biz Retroactively for FY 2023/24 Resolution 24-111, Accepting And Appropriating Grant Retroactively For FY 2023/24 From The California Governor’s Office Of Business And Economic Development For Assessment Of A Cannabis Equity Program
Time Extension for Use Permit UPR-1-22-15498, Design Review DR-7-22-15775 - 79 Saint Francis Square Drive Through Restaurant
Resolution 24-112, Approving Extension For Use Permit UPR-1-22-15498 And Design Review DR-7-22-15775 – 79 Saint Francis Square Drive Through Restaurant Time Extension for Use Permit UPR-2-23-016129 – 79 Saint Francis Square Sign Program Resolution 24-113, Approving Extension For Use Permit UPR-2-23-016129 – 79 Saint Francis Square Sign Program
Appropriate Funds for Top of the Hill Street Festival and Authorize City Manager to Execute Professional Services Agreement with Anthony Presents LLC Director of Economic and Community Development Tatum Mothershead provided the staff report including the proposal of a street fair as a way to revitalize the business community in the Top of the Hill neighborhood, the costs related to the street fair, and introduced Economic Development Specialist Maybelle Manio as project lead. Staff addressed questions on the scheduled date for the event, persons involved in the planning committee, how the proposed budget will be utilized, security and police services and related costs, power supply sources, whether entertainment will be provided, the selection process for the event planner, whether there is an entrance fee to the fair, other departments’ involvement in planning the event, associated fees for sponsors and booths, number of people expected, whether staff is working with the transportation agencies to address public transportation issues, and ADA plans for the event.
The Council discussed the street festival’s viability, the Council’s priorities, the event’s financial impact(s), whether the timing was right for the event, the needs of and challenges faced by the Top of the Hill area, the work yet to be done to revitalize the area, the process of selecting an event planner, and considered whether the item should be continued to the next Council meeting to receive more information.
CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
JULY 8, 2024
3 A member of the community commented on the good of bringing community together, but expressed concern with the abandoned pantry building and unclean conditions in the area, and mentioned organizations that would like to serve the community.
Augusto Valera Jr., M.D., referred to the Westlake festival from 1999, noted safety and parking concerns in the area, and encouraged involving more organizations and volunteers to support the proposal.
Brent Turner expressed appreciation for and commended the City’s efforts to create a festival, noting the benefits to the City from the potential sales tax revenue.
Vennie Acebedo commented on the festival being a haphazard plan, noting that the timeframe was too short, and made remarks on how the festival discounted the City’s Recreation staff.
Economic Development Specialist Maybelle Manio provided information on her background and experience in the event industry and producing mass-scale festivals, reported on meeting with businesses in the Top of the Hill to help prepare them for the upcoming event, and noted benefits from a street fair including its potential to attract more businesses and increase tourism.
Director of Recreation Services Denise Brown provided information on the Recreation Department’s meetings with Economic and Community Development staff about the project, noting the Recreation Department is one hundred percent behind the festival and would be providing support for the event.
It was moved by Mayor Manalo, seconded by Councilmember Sylvester and carried to adopt the resolution by the following roll call vote:
Ayes: Proaño, Sylvester, Manalo
Abstained: DiGiovanni
Resolution 24-114, Authorizing Execution Of Professional Services Agreement With Anthony Presents LLC And Appropriating Funds For The Top Of The Hill Street Festival Notice of Completion for Fire Station 91 Roofing Project Resolution 24-115, Accepting Completion of Certain Project in the Department of Public Works (Fire Station 91 Roofing Project)
Notice of Completion for the 2021-2022 and 2022-23 Street Resurfacing Project Resolution 24-116, Accepting Completion of Certain Project in the Department of Public Works (2021-22 and 2022-23 Street Resurfacing Project)
Authorize City Manager to Approve Contract Change Orders for the Construction Contract for the Mussel Rock Landfill Upper Disposal Area Pull-Back Project Resolution 24-117, Approving Contract Change Orders For The Construction Contract For The Mussel Rock Landfill Upper Disposal Area Pull-Back Project
CITY OF DALY CITY
MINUTES – REGULAR MEETING – CITY COUNCIL
JULY 8, 2024
4 Adopt Resolution for Classification Amendments Previously Approved During Budget Process Resolution 24-118, Memorializing Classification Amendments For Specific Miscellaneous/ Unrepresented Classifications
END OF CONSENT AGENDA
REPORTS:
City Council
Mayor Manalo reported attendance at the following events: the grand opening of Pacifica’s City Hall, along with Councilmember Sylvester, Councilmember Proaño, City Manager Piccolotti, and Director Cosgrove; the bocce ball competition with the Recreation team and which was won by the older adults/seniors team, joined by Mariann Mann and Councilmember Proaño; the Hui Fest at the Bayshore celebrating Tahitian culture, commending Debbie Viray and the dancers, and acknowledging the staff and community members for their efforts; the SF Pride Alice B. Toklas breakfast with Supervisor Stefani; the Philippine Independence Day reception with the Filipino Women’s Network at the Philippine Consulate; and the annual barbeque event hosted by the Filipino Democratic Club of San Mateo. Manalo thanked her colleagues for their questions on and optimism in the Top of the Hill festival.
Councilmember DiGiovanni reported attendance at the Hui Fest honoring Chief Coco from Tahiti along with Councilmember Proaño, and acknowledged the Bayshore Recreation staff for their work.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Manalo adjourned the meeting at 9:34 PM in memory of Barbara Maharaj and Corazon de Guzman Dandan.
Approved as submitted, this 22nd
City Clerk
day of July , 2024.
Juslyn C. Manalo
Mayor
City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Authorize the City Manager to Execute Construction Contract for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance Facility Roof Project
Recommended Action
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Garland/DBS Inc. for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility roof replacement in an amount of $523,311 and also authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all other necessary contracts to complete the project.
Discussion
In 2017 the City completed a comprehensive facility condition assessment (FCA) of City owned buildings, including the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility. One of the recommendations included in the FCA for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility is replacement of the roof in year 2025. In 2023, a follow-up assessment of the roof highlighted the need for a complete replacement due to failure of the roof seams and deteriorated roof and wall panels. These failures continue to cause water leaks during rain events resulting in damage to the interior of the facility. During the City’s adoption of the fiscal year 2023/2024 Comprehensive Annual Capital Budget, $660,000 was allocated to the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility roof replacement project.
Omnia Partners Purchasing Program is a cooperative purchasing alliance that simplifies and optimizes the procurement process for public sector entities by leveraging collective buying power.
This program combines the resources of two leading cooperative purchasing organizations, National IPA and U.S. Communities, to offer access to competitively solicited contracts. The Omnia Partners Purchasing Program assists local and state government agencies in reducing the cost of purchased goods and services through pooling the purchasing power of public agencies nationwide.
Cooperative purchasing agreements like the OMNIA Partners Purchasing Program meet all requirements outlined under the California Government Code. Daly City as well as other public agencies can participate in cooperative purchasing agreements, while still adhering to the City's Municipal Code and adopted rules and procedures for the procurement of goods and services.
The proposal from Garland/DBS involves replacing the entire roofing system, rain gutters, and parapet wall panels and cap. The new roofing system will incorporate modern, high-quality materials designed to improve water drainage and weather resistance. These upgrades are expected to enhance the long-term structural integrity of the roof, reduce maintenance costs, and ensure the safety and comfort of staff working in the facility.
Garland's turnkey services provide a comprehensive solution for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility roof replacement project. This approach offers several benefits:
• Pricing Competitiveness: Leveraging the collective buying power of public agencies to obtain superior pricing.
Authorize City Manager execute Construction Contract for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance Facility Roof Replacement
July 22, 2024
• Turnkey Single-Source Accountability: Garland will act as both the material manufacturer and project manager to ensure warranty integrity and efficient project management. • Speedy Implementation: Garland utilizes local pre-qualified contractors to expedite project completion.
The City is a member of the OMNIA Partners cooperative purchasing program and can participate in the contract. If approved, the City would contract directly with Garland for the project.
Fiscal Impact
The total cost of the project is $523,311, which includes the complete roof replacement and all associated material, labor, and warranties. Funding is available in the Parks/Fleet Maintenance Roof Replacement, account number 31-313-588.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Garland/DBS Inc. for the Parks/Fleet Maintenance facility roof replacement in an amount of $523,311 and also authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all other necessary contracts to complete the project.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeffery Fornesi Richard Chiu, Jr.
Asst. to the Director of Public Works Director of Public Works Attachment: Garland/DBS, Inc Proposal, No. 25-CA-240813
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. 6.
7. Proposal Price Based Upon Market Experience: $ 523,311 • STANDING SEAM PANELS TO BE CONTINUOUS PANELS WITHOUT LAPS THROUGH THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PANEL.
Garland/DBS, Inc.
3800 East 91st Street
Cleveland, OH 44105
Phone: (800) 762-8225
Fax: (216) 883-2055
ROOFING MATERIAL AND SERVICES PROPOSAL
City of Daly City
Corp Yard Fleet Building
333 90th St
Daly City, CA 94015
INSTALL NEW COPING CAP.
INSTALL NEW PIPE PENETRATION FLASHING.
INSTALL NEW GUTTER.
DAYLIGHT (E) VENT IN (N) WALL PANELS AND INSTALL PIPE BOOT FLASHING TO MATCH € CONDITION.
Date Submitted: 07/12/2024
Proposal #: 25-CA-240813
MOUNT EXHAUST FANS ON METAL CURBS CURB.
MICPA # PW1925
CA General Contractor #: 949380
Scope of Work: Install aluminum structural standing seam metal roof panels. System will be installed per the engineer stamped calculations to withstand wind uplift pressures of a future solar system.
DEMO (E) METAL ROOF PANELS, SKYLIGHTS AND GUTTER. INSTALL (N) STRUCTURAL
STANDING SEAM ROOF PANELS AND GUTTER WITH ASSOCIATED SHEET METAL ACCESSORIES.
DEMO (E) WALL PANELS ABOVE ROOF AND INSTALL (N) WALL PANELS O/ (E) FRAMING.
Purchase orders to be made out to: Garland/DBS, Inc.
Please Note: The following budget/estimate is being provided according to the pricing established under the Master Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement (MICPA) with Racine County, WI and OMNIA Partners, Public Sector (U.S. Communities). Garland/DBS, Inc. administered an informal competitive process for obtaining quotes for the project with the hopes of providing a lower market-adjusted price whenever possible.
1 San Francisco Roofing Services, Inc
2 Pionner Contractors
per Ln. Ft.
Clarifications/Exclusions:
1. 2.
3. 7.
4. Respectfully Submitted,
John Petersen
Garland/DBS, Inc.
(216) 302-3777
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to call me at my number listed below.
John Petersen
$ 532,311
$ 744,953
Potential issues that could arise during the construction phase of the project will be addressed via unit pricing for additional work beyond the scope of the specifications. This could range anywhere from wet insulation, to the replacement of deteriorated wood nailers. $ 28.50
Please Note – The construction industry is experiencing unprecedented global pricing and availability pressures for many key building components. Specifically, the roofing industry is currently experiencing long lead times and significant price increases with roofing insulation and roofing fasteners. Therefore, this proposal can only be held for 30 days. DBS greatly values your business, and we are working diligently with our long-term suppliers to minimize price increases and project delays which could effect your project. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.
Garland/DBS Price Based Upon Local Market Competition:
San Francisco Roofing Services, Inc - Unforeseen Site Conditions:
LF cost to treat rust on (E) Z-purlins – wire wheel, prime w/ rust inhibitive primer and paint w/Tnemic:
Prevailing Wages are included.
Any work not exclusively described in the above proposal scope of work is excluded.
Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical work is excluded.
Masonry work is included to which it obtains to the scope of work.
Interior Temporary protection is included to the extent that any equipment directly below the work area will be covered as needed to protect against dust and debris.
City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Authorization to Approve an Amendment for the Professional Services Agreement for the City of Daly City’s City Facilities – Interior Improvements Project
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment for the professional services agreement with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) of San Francisco, California in the amount of $185,000 for a total contract amount of $334,875 to complete the design for the City Facilities – Interior Improvements Project.
Background
On October 10, 2023, the City awarded the professional services agreement with SSA for the preparation of the City Facilities – Interior Improvements Project. The project scope included, reviewing as-built documents, visiting city facilities, and preparing construction plans, specifications and cost estimates to remove existing interior barriers identified in the 2020 ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Report at City Hall, Doelger Senior Center, Westlake Community Center and Lincoln Park Community Center.
Discussion
During the preliminary facility site walks and detailed discussions with staff, SSA identified major ADA issues inside the City Council Chambers. These preliminary findings indicate the need to redesign the City Council Chambers dais. The revised work scope would include additional coordination meetings, recreating as-built drawings for City facilities and preparation of design documents for the City Council Chambers. These additional tasks were not included in the original agreement and are critical to completing the project design.
Fiscal Impact
The estimated total design cost for this project is $334,875, which includes the $149,875 original design contract and $185,000 for additional design services provided by SSA.
There are sufficient funds in Fiscal Year 2023-24 in the ADA Facility Upgrade Project account 31- 313-875 to fully fund this request. No additional appropriation is needed at this time.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment for the professional services agreement with SSA in the amount of $185,000 for a total contract amount of $334,875 to complete the design for the City Facilities – Interior Improvements Project.
Authorization to Approve an Amendment for the Professional Services Agreement for the City of Daly City’s City Facilities-Interior Imp Project Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Chan Richard Chiu, Jr.
Acting City Engineer Director of Public Works
City Council Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with HDR, Inc. for Project Management Services
Recommended Action
Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 6 to the professional services agreement with HDR, Inc. of Oakland, California, to provide project management services in the amount of $140,360.00, for a total contract amount of $853,994.78.
Background
On September 17, 2021, an agreement was executed with WRECO (now HDR, Inc.) to provide staff augmentation for permit technician services in an amount not to exceed $39,835.13. The permit technician provided work to review and process permit applications for building, utility, sewer, water, and encroachment permits while recruitment for the Engineering Technician position was underway. Five agreement amendments have been executed to extend the duration and to provide additional project manager services with an additional person, increasing the current contract amount to $713,634.78. The project manager performed contract administration, public bidding and consultant procurement, design support and preparation of bidding documents, and construction management on the Capital Improvement Program projects.
Discussion
The Public Works Engineering Division continues to have a vacancy in its Senior Civil Engineer position. The recruitment process is underway.
The proposed $140,360.00 Amendment No. 6 includes budget for a part-time project manager for approximately 6 additional months. The project manager will perform contract administration, public bidding and consultant procurement, design support and preparation of bidding documents, and construction management on CIP projects, as well as general office support. If approved, the existing contract of $713,634.78 would increase by $140,360.00 to a total contract amount of $853,994.78.
Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost for Amendment No. 6 with HDR, Inc. provides for a total not-to-exceed amount of $140,360.00. Adequate funding for the consultant services is available for the project manager position by utilizing $40,000.00 of salary savings from the vacant Senior Civil Engineering position and $100,360.00 within the respective CIP projects. Therefore, no additional funds are required.
Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement
with HDR, Inc. for Project Management Services
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 6 to the professional services agreement with HDR, Inc. of Oakland, California, to provide project management services in the amount of $140,360.00, for a total contract amount of $853,994.78.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Chan Richard Chiu Jr.
Acting City Engineer Director of Public Works
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
asdfa
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Appropriate $15,000 of Fund 96 – Bayshore Redevelopment RDA - Fund Balance for Rehabilitation of Vacant Unit and Other Property Improvements at 260 Abbot Recommended Action
• Appropriate $15,000 for rehabilitation and upgrades to affordable housing units at 260 Abbot
Background
In 2007 the former Daly City Redevelopment Agency acquired a five-unit apartment building at 260 Abbot. The goal of this acquisition was to rehabilitate and preserve affordable housing units.
With the dissolution of redevelopment in 2012, the building was transferred to the City and has continued to provide affordable housing to five very low income households. In 2023 a household that had occupied their unit for over 25 years vacated their unit. In order to rent the unit to a new household, significant repairs and refurbishment are needed.
In addition to rehabilitation of the vacant unit, staff is recommending two general improvements to the building:
• Installation of laundry facilities on the garage level • Provision of internet services to the whole building
The estimated cost for the recommended improvements is $15,000.
Discussion
The proposed improvements will ensure habitability of the existing vacant unit and enable the City to rent it to a very low income household. Installation of laundry services will provide a convenience and comfort to working households who currently need to drive or walk several blocks to do laundry.
Provision of reliable internet service to all households is an important step in ensuring that all households have equal access to modern telecommunications technologies that are critical for participation in education, employment, health and civic activities.
Fiscal Impact
An addition $15,000 is needed to be appropriated for the rehabilitation and upgrades to affordable housing units at 260 Abbot. There are sufficient funds in the Bayshore Redevelopment fund balance and if approved will still see an anticipated surplus of $3,500 for FY 2025.
City Council Agenda Report
Subject: Allocation of Funding for Rehabilitation of 260 Abbot Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Summary /Conclusions
Staff recommends appropriating $15,000 for rehabilitation and maintenance in the FY 25 Abbot budget for the purpose of improving the housing quality and living conditions for low-income households living at 260 Abbot.
Respectfully submitted,
Tatum Mothershead
Economic and Community Development Director
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Approve the Use of Measure Q Funds to Create a Police Department Mental Health Crisis Response Unit
Recommended Action
Staff recommends the Council approve the use of Measure Q funds to create a Police Department Mental Health Crisis Response Unit, consisting of a Crisis Response Supervisor and a Crisis Response Clinician I/II.
Background
The Police Department just concluded a 2-year mental health crisis response pilot program in collaboration with the County of San Mateo. This program, known as the Community Wellness and Crisis Response Team (CWCRT), was partially funded by the County of San Mateo during the pilot program, which ended June 30, 2024. Beginning this current fiscal year (FY 24/25), participating agencies were required to fund any ongoing clinical field resources as desired by the individual agency.
Discussion
The CWCRT program was a collaboration between the County of San Mateo, Behavioral Health and Recovery Services (SMCO BHRS), StarVista, a non-profit organization managing the clinicians, and the Stanford Gardner Center, the academic research component examining the efficacy of the model. The co-response model consisted of a clinician and a police officer responding to calls for service involving subjects experiencing a potential mental health crisis.
This model proved successful in both academic research and anecdotal perspectives within the department and in the field. The Daly City Police Department, along with three of the larger agencies in San Mateo County, were selected as the pilot agencies, all of which echoed the same resounding support for the program and realized similar benefits to the communities and their agencies. The Stanford Gardner Center found that involuntary psychiatric detentions decreased approximately 17% throughout the pilot program amongst agencies sharing data. Some of this decrease is believed to be a result of preventing mental health emergencies from occurring, likely attributed to a more adequate level of care identified by participating clinicians in the field, reducing recidivism for acute cases. This result should reduce repeat calls for service, freeing up first responder services for other needs.
The Mental Health clinician had a significant impact on the police department and community alike. The co-response model often de-escalated situations and led to a more favorable outcome for individuals experiencing a mental health crisis, frequently requiring reduced or no law enforcement engagement. While the program was not intended to include follow-up case work or prolonged in-field care, there were times it became appropriate to ensure an adequate level of care as well as to support families seeking long term results. Additionally, the clinician participated in new hire and officer crisis intervention training, as well as officer wellness and critical stress
debriefs. Over time, officers learned by watching the clinician in the field, and as a result, improved their response to related calls in the absence of or while waiting for a clinician to arrive on scene.
The clinicians that worked for Daly City were welcomed and became a pivotal component to a well-rounded response, appreciated and valued by officers in the field. All initial pilot agencies shared these experiences and are intending to maintain a co-response model, with a pilot program extension expanding this service to other agencies throughout the county.
The police department desires to maintain a co-response Mental Health Crisis Response Unit to meet the needs of the community and ensure a well-rounded field response. Over the last 3-years, to include the duration of the pilot program, the co-response clinician responded to 463 calls for service. During this same timeframe, there were 769 involuntary psychiatric detentions. The disparity between the number of detentions and the times a clinician was available and responded demonstrates the need for additional clinicians to better serve those experiencing a mental health crisis. The benefits realized during the pilot program demonstrate the value and necessity. The Mental Health Crisis Response Unit would initially consist of two full-time employees, with the ability to expand should the need or desire be recognized. The Crisis Response Unit would be a component of the police department and work in close collaboration to further the department’s mission to provide safety and service to the community. The unit would be comprised of a Crisis Response Supervisor and a Crisis Response Clinician, who would both work independently to allow for greater periods of coverage in the field.
The primary objective of the unit would be to support the police department and the community in a co-response model to incidents or calls for service that have the potential to have a mental health crisis component. The clinicians would monitor the police radio and would either be requested through dispatch or could self-attach to a call if they feel their services would be beneficial. The department would continue the partnership with the SMCO BHRS, a desired component that supports the clinicians’ ability to effectively serve in their capacity. Initial coverage would be Monday through Friday, spanning the morning to early evening as call volumes and statistics suggest the need. Future expansion could be considered as the need is identified.
Staff is recommending the approval of two new clinician job specifications, to include a Crisis Response Supervisor and the Crisis Response Clinician I/II (see Attachments – Job Specifications).
The positions would be Miscellaneous/Unrepresented classifications and would be assigned to the salary ranges outlined in the graph below. These salary ranges are recommended based on comparable salaries of other Bay Area agencies with similar programs.
Classification Range Est. Salary – Step 5 Est. Benefits Total Crisis Response
Supervisor U 079
$157,939 $92,620 $250,559
Crisis Response
Clinician II U 068
$142,546 $84,690 $227,236
Crisis Response
Clinician I U 058
$128,902 $79,156 $208,058
Staff is also recommending the approval to hire two full-time employees to staff the Mental Health Crisis Response Unit, consisting of the Crisis Response Supervisor, and the Crisis Response Clinician I/II. The Crisis Response Supervisor is a mandatory position for the unit, as it requires a
valid clinical license recognized by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences, which allows this unit to operate independently. This certification permits the supervisor to manage non-licensed, but registered practicing clinicians (Crisis Response Clinician I) participating in field work, while also ensuring efficient collaboration with SMCO BHRS. The Crisis Response Clinician flex up level II position will require the California Board of Behavioral Sciences license, with additional cumulative crisis response field work of 2-years or more. As these clinicians will be expected to operate in the field daily, and considering there will be overlap in shiftwork, two additional vehicles will be necessary to ensure availability for timely responses. These vehicles will be marked as Mental Health Crisis Response Unit vehicles, and will be equipped with hazard/safety lighting, and a police radio. Specific makes/models will be selected once configuration requirements are identified, however we intend on purchasing hybrid vehicles with an estimated cost of $60,000 per vehicle, to include all outfitting.
Fiscal Impact
During the 2-year pilot program while participating in the CWCRT model, expenses where shared mutually between the County of San Mateo and the participating agencies. This agreement ended with the close of the 23/24 fiscal year, transferring the full cost for the CWCRT program to the individual agencies. In anticipation of continuing with a co-response clinician in the field, the Police Department budgeted $260,000 for estimated costs in the fiscal year 24/25 budget, which was approved by the City Council on June 24, 2024.
The proposed Mental Health Crisis Response Unit, consisting of a Crisis Response Supervisor and a Crisis Response Clinician I/II, with the addition of two new dedicated vehicles, is estimated to cost $578,617. Taking into consideration the already budgeted $260,000 in Measure Q funds from this fiscal year (FY 24/25) to continue the initial pilot program model, the remaining amount of Measure Q funds needed to offset the cost and create the Mental Health Crisis Response Unit within the Police Department is estimated to be $318,617.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Miscellaneous/Unrepresented job specifications for the Crisis Response Supervisor and Crisis Response Clinician I/II as outlined above, and approve the hiring of two full-time employees, as well as approve the purchase of associated vehicles and appropriate $318,617 of Measure Q funds.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Cameron Christensen
Acting Chief of Police
Attachments: Job Descriptions – Crisis Response Supervisor, Crisis Response Clinician I/II
CITY OF DALY CITY
JOB SPECIFICATION
EXEMPT POSITION
CRISIS RESPONSE SUPERVISOR
DEFINITION
Under general supervision provides field and office based professional behavioral health counseling, psychoeducation, outreach and engagement, case management, consultation, and quality assurance review of assigned cases; and performs related other work as required or assigned.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Manage and supervise the Police Department’s response to crisis intervention services; supervise, oversee, direct, schedule and coordinate the work of assigned staff; perform initial risk assessment during a crisis noting behavioral symptoms which may indicate mental health disorders in children, youth, or adults; determine whether individuals meet the criteria for a W&I 5150 application and follow appropriate procedure; determine other resources to connect individuals to who do not meet criteria for 5150; work closely with different law enforcement communities; participate in monthly San Mateo County Field Crisis Consultation Committee (FCCC) as needed; establish and maintain effective relationships with contractors, community organizations and other governmental agencies regarding programs and services; participate in committees, meetings and conferences; provide guidance regarding appropriate social-psychological practices and services. perform suicidal/homicidal/Grave Disability risk assessments; conduct home visits and/or field-based services; provide crisis intervention as needed; provide brief outreach counseling and refer clients to appropriate behavioral health resources; collect and evaluate medical or psychosocial data such as case histories, behavior patterns and family relationships of patients/clients; follow up with individuals where appropriate who are reluctant to engage with resources; work as a psychiatric team member with other treatment disciplines; utilize Trauma Informed Care and other evidence-based practices; provide consultation and education services; compile and prepare reports and documentation on clinical activities; maintain records; prepares periodic reports; ability to work weekends and perform related duties as assigned.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of: Current office procedures, including use of word processing, spreadsheet and specialized software applications; current philosophy, principles, and practices for services to clients with serious mental illness; individual, group and family psychodynamics as they relate to adults or children in crisis; psychological diagnostic methods and
JOB SPECIFICATION
CRISIS RESPONSE SUPERVISOR (PAGE 2)
terminology for mental health disorders; personality development from infancy through adulthood; de-escalation techniques; human and health services systems in the County including private agencies and other community resources; procedures and issues specific to mobile crisis intervention; applicable local, State and Federal laws, ordinances and rules.
Ability to: Provide effective clinical supervision and clinical consultation; provide mental health treatment to adults, children or adolescents with various mental disabilities ranging from serious mental illness to dysfunctional behavior patterns, including victims of sexual or physical abuse; set realistic treatment goals and facilitate their attainment; evaluate the degree of mental disability or emotional distress of patients/clients; communicate effectively orally and in writing; make presentations to outside organizations, agencies and community; oversee, direct and coordinate the work of assigned staff; select, supervise and train, counsel and discipline staff; provide consultation and technical assistance to agencies, schools and other organizations; develop strong working relationships with community agencies; work with multicultural communities; operate modern office equipment including specialized software applications programs; interacts positively and cooperate with co-workers, responds politely to customers, works as a team member, functions under demanding time pressure, responds in a positive manner to supervision, attends work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
Education: Master's degree from accredited college or university in Social Work, Social Welfare, Psychology or a closely related field.
Experience: Five years of professional experience in the social work or counseling field with strong emphasis on social services, crisis response, severe mental illnesses, resources and referrals using a collaborative and community framework.
License: A current license with the State of California Board of Behavioral Sciences as either a LCSW, LMFT, LPCC or licensed Clinical Psychologist required.
Possession of a valid Class C California Driver's License. 07/24
CITY OF DALY CITY
JOB SPECIFICATION
EXEMPT POSITION
CRISIS RESPONSE CLINICIAN I/II
DEFINITION
Crisis Response Clinician I: Under direct supervision of the Crisis Response Supervisor, provides field and office based professional behavioral health counseling, psychoeducation, outreach and engagement, case management, consultation, and quality assurance review of assigned cases; and performs related other work as required or assigned.
Crisis Response Clinician II: Under general supervision of the Crisis Response Supervisor, provides field and office based professional behavioral health counseling, psychoeducation, outreach and engagement, case management, consultation, and quality assurance review of assigned cases; and performs related other work as required or assigned. This is a full journey level position within the Crisis Response Clinician series and is distinguished from the Crisis Response Clinician I by the performance of the full range of duties with only occasional instruction or assistance.
Under the flexible staffing concept, Crisis Response Clinician II positions that become vacant may reasonably be filled at the Crisis Response Clinician I level for training purposes.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Perform initial diagnostic evaluation during a crisis noting behavioral symptoms which may indicate mental health disorders in children, youth, or adults; determine whether individuals meet the criteria for a W&I 5150 and follow appropriate procedure; determine other resources to connect individuals to who do not meet criteria for 5150; work closely with different law enforcement communities; participate in monthly San Mateo County Field Crisis Consultation Committee (FCCC) as needed; establish and maintain effective relationships with contractors and community organizations and other governmental agencies regarding programs and services; participate in committees, meetings and conferences; provide guidance regarding appropriate social-psychological practices and services. perform suicidal/homicidal/Grave Disability risk assessments; conduct home visits and/or field-based services; provide crisis Intervention as needed; provide outreach counseling and refer clients to appropriate behavioral health resources; collect and evaluate medical or psychosocial data such as case histories, behavior patterns and family relationships of patients/clients; follow up with individuals where appropriate who are reluctant to engage with resources; work as a psychiatric team member with other treatment disciplines; utilize Trauma Informed Care and other evidence-based practices;
JOB SPECIFICATION
CRISIS RESPONSE CLINICIAN I/II (PAGE 2)
provide consultation and education services; compile and prepare reports and documentation on clinical activities; maintain records; prepares periodic reports; ability to work weekends and perform related duties as assigned.
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of: Office machines and specialized software applications; current philosophy, principles, and practices for services to clients with serious mental illness; individual, group and family psychodynamics as they relate to adults or children in crisis; psychological diagnostic methods and terminology; personality development from infancy through adulthood; human and health services systems in the County including private agencies and other community resources; applicable local, State and Federal laws, ordinances and rules.
Ability to: Provide crisis intervention treatment to adults, children or adolescents with various mental disabilities ranging from serious mental illness to dysfunctional behavior patterns, including victims of sexual or physical abuse; set realistic treatment goals and facilitate their attainment; evaluate the degree of mental disability or emotional distress of patients/clients; communicate effectively orally and in writing; provide consultation and technical assistance to agencies, schools and other organizations; operate modern office equipment including specialized software applications programs; interacts positively and cooperate with co-workers, responds politely to customers, works as a team member, functions under demanding time pressure, responds in a positive manner to supervision, attends work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
Education: Master's degree from accredited college or university in Social Work, Social Welfare, Psychology, or a closely related field.
Experience:
Crisis Response Clinician I: One (1) year of experience working in the social work or counseling field with strong emphasis on social services, crisis response, severe mental illness, resources, and referrals using a collaborative and community framework.
Crisis Response Clinician II: Two (2) years of experience working in the social work or counseling field with strong emphasis on social services, crisis response, severe mental illness, resources, and referrals using a collaborative and community framework.
License:
Possession of a valid Class C California Driver's License.
Crisis Response Clinician I: Registered with the State of California Board of Behavioral
JOB SPECIFICATION
CRISIS RESPONSE CLINICIAN I/II (PAGE 3)
Sciences as an APCC, AMFT or ACSW. A current license with the State of California Board of Behavioral Sciences, as either a LCSW, LMFT, LPCC or licensed Clinical Psychologist desirable.
Crisis Response Clinician II: A current license with the State of California Board of Behavioral Sciences as either a LCSW, LMFT, LPCC or licensed Clinical Psychologist required.
07/24
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Approve Use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to Purchase a Polaris Ranger Crew XP1000 Utility Task Vehicle for Use by the Police Department Recommended Action
Staff recommends City Council approve the use of Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds to purchase a Polaris Utility Task Vehicle for use by the Police Department.
Background
The Police Department conducts general operations and provides community safety efforts during events throughout the city where the use of a utility task vehicle (UTV) could improve effectiveness and efficiency. Currently, the Department does not have such a vehicle.
Discussion
UTV’s are midsized off-road capable vehicles that typically carry 2-6 passengers. They can operate in a variety of terrain, and properly outfitted can provide support to different units within the police department. Opportunities for a UTV include large scale community events, patrols, and details at congested locations where vehicle operations are impeded, support for transporting the Bicycle Patrol Unit during identified details, search and rescue in remote locations on the coast or in San Bruno Mountain, and for carrying out services following natural disasters. The primary challenge associated with all these potential use cases is either accessibility or maneuverability, given terrain or congestion concerns.
Staff evaluated UTV options and identified the Polaris Ranger Crew XP1000, law enforcement edition, as best suited for our needs. It is fully enclosed, climate controlled and capable of deploying 6 passengers while maintaining a cargo bed. It is outfitted with custom law enforcement graphics and emergency lighting, clearly distinguishing it as an emergency response vehicle.
Fiscal Impact
Funding is available using Federal Asset Forfeiture Funds. The one-time purchase cost for a Polaris Ranger Crew XP1000 through Polaris Government and Defense, the sole source provider of the law enforcement edition, is not to exceed $55,000.
Summary/Conclusions
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Cameron Christensen
Acting Chief of Police
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Approve Proposed Revisions of Lead Groundskeeper Gardener Job Specification, and Approve Proposed Title Change and Job Specification Revisions for Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker Job Specification (Civil Service)
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed revisions to the Lead Groundskeeper Gardener job specification, and approve the title change and job specification revisions for the Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker.
Background/Discussion
Through the 2019 Labor negotiations process, the City and AFSCME Local 829 agreed to review the Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker classification. As a result, both parties are in agreement to revert back to using a title specific to the division the employee will be assigned to. On April 8, 2024, the City Council previously approved the change to the Lead Public Works Maintenance Worker assigned to the Streets Division.
The Lead Groundskeeper Gardener job specification has been updated to accurately reflect the duties of the position.
Staff is also recommending a title change for the Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker. This will make the title consistent with the other Lead Worker classifications in Public Works. The Lead Building Maintenance Worker job specification also has been updated to accurately reflect the duties of the position and remain at range X044 of the AFSCME salary schedule.
The City Manager has approved the proposed title change and civil service job specifications and the City has met and conferred in good faith with the affected bargaining units and, as a result, have agreed to the proposed title change and job specification changes.
Fiscal Impact
No fiscal impact.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the proposed revisions to the Lead Groundskeeper Gardener job specification, and approve the title change and job specification revisions for the Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Natalie Sakkal
Director of Human Resources
City Council Agenda Report
Subject: Approve Proposed Revisions of Lead Groundskeeper Gardener Job Specification, and Approve Proposed Title Change and Job Specification Revisions for Senior Building Maintenance Worker to Lead Building Maintenance Worker Job Specification (Civil Service) Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Attachments
CITY OF DALY CITY APPROVED BY:
JOB SPECIFICATION PERSONNEL BOARD: 09/12/2013
CITY COUNCIL: 10/14/2013
RES. NO. 13-157
LEAD GROUNDSKEEPER/GARDENERPUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE WORKER
DEFINITION
Under general supervision, serves as a lead worker and assumes significant responsibilities for the general maintenance, repair, construction, and inspections of landscaping and trees, irrigations systems, pathways, and sports fields. Supervises, organizes, trains, and provides direction to assigned personnel and performs a variety of skilled tasks related to the maintenance, repair and construction of landscaping, irrigations systems, and pathways, and performs other related duties as assigned.Under general supervision of a Public Works Maintenance Supervisor, provides lead direction, personally performs any combination of tasks involved with inspection, construction, repair, preventative, corrective and emergency maintenance of streets, roadways, storm drains, landscaping, irrigation, sports fields, playground structures, public buildings, facilities and related structures, and performs other duties as assigned. The Lead Public Works Maintenance Workers may be assigned to one of three (3) Public Works Maintenance Sections (Streets, Buildings, or Parks).
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
This classification is distinguished from the Groundskeeper/Gardener Maintenance Worker I/II classification series by the performance of more skilled and complex public maintenance and repair tasks, and the requirement to oversee, lead and train subordinate a crew of employees. Incumbents may also perform all the duties customarily performed by a Groundskeeper/Gardener I/II. Maintenance Worker I/II in any of the assigned areas:
Streets, Buildings or Parks.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Leads and performs complex skilled landscape and irrigation maintenance and repair duties. Maintains sports fields, landscape areas, roadway medians, irrigation systems, and related facilities. Picks up litter around parks, roadway medians, and City facilities.
Water, mow, weed, trim, renovate, and fertilize lawns; prunes trees and shrubs; plants and propagates trees, flowers, and shrubs. Applies herbicides, fungicides, and pesticides safely; maintains record of fertilizers and chemicals used. Installs and maintains irrigations systems.
Prepares the detailed planning, scheduling and organization of the work of assigned personnel; checks oversees work of assigned crews to verifysee that work is done
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD GROUNDSKEEPER GARDENER (PAGE 2)
properly and expeditiously; confers with Public Works Maintenance Ssupervisor on significant deviations; prepares cost estimates as required; may assist in the preparation of annual budgets, including capital improvements; assists in projecting personnel, equipment, and material needs; opens and completes work orders; maintains records concerning installations, repairs, and the condition of the landscaped areas facility or site of assigned work; makes recommendations for improvements, additions, alterations and repairs and may inspect work performed by outside contractors; assists in preparing employee performance evaluations, conducts effective training on equipment operation, care, cleaning and maintenance; and general safety and work site safety; advises on safety precautions and instructs personnel in the
technical aspects of work performed; responds to inquiries and complaints pertaining to the work of the Parks Maintenance Section as directed; other related duties as assigned.
Operates hand and power tools, mowers, tractors, trenchers, and heavy equipment common to landscapeing, paving maintenance work; performs routine maintenance of such equipment. or general construction. Reads and interprets construction plans and specifications and prepare cost estimates; meets with and monitors oversees assigned personnel, contractors and vendors.
Depending on the Public Works Maintenance Section the employee is assigned may personally perform typical duties in one of the following broad categories:
Parks- safely handles and apply pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, propagates plants, transplants and cares for flowers, ornamental trees and shrubs; installs and maintains irrigation systems;
Streets- safely handles and applies thermoplastic and paint for roadway striping; maintains street pavement, signage, stripping and storm drain facilities; Buildings- repairs and maintains plumbing and heating systems, door hardware and locks, roofs, fencing, sheet rock, paneling, floor and wall covering and general carpentry;
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of: Practical aspects of supervisory principles and practices including effectively maintaining a work environment that is free of discrimination and harassment; elements of work scheduling; labor and material cost estimating for landscape, irrigation, and sports field renovationPublic Works Maintenance projects; basic recordkeeping and budget procedures; standard safety procedures, including working practices and safety orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety pertinent to landscape, irrigation, and sports field general or utility construction, and maintenance, and repair; methods, tools, materials, and types and functions of equipment used; provisions of the California Vehicle
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD GROUNDSKEEPER GARDENER (PAGE 3)
Code as it applies to the loading and operation of motor vehicles; applicable Federal, State and local laws, codes and regulations.
Ability to: Supervise, schedule, train, and direct the work of assigned personnel; follow oral and written directions; prepare clear and accurate reports; prepare and maintain accurate records; read and interpret plans and specifications; be available in an emergency for night and weekend work; operate and maintain all types of specialized equipment used in the maintenance of public buildings, landscaping, irrigation, and sports fields and street infrastructure; perform skilled and semi-skilled tasks; organize and direct building, street, and parks maintenance projects; analyze situations effectively and develop appropriate solutions to correct problem areas, communicate in a professional manner with various personnel, including personnel from other City Departments, city residents, engineering consultants and industry representatives, communicate clearly and concisely with contacts both verbally and in writing, as needed, to perform one’s assignments, interact positively and cooperatively with co-workers, respond politely to customers, work as a team member, function under demanding time pressures, respond in a positive manner to supervision, and attend work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
Experience: Three (3) years of increasingly responsible experience in performing skilled work in the maintenance, repair, and/or construction of of landscaping, irrigation, and sports fieldsstreets, roadways, storm drains systems, landscaping, irrigation, sports fields, playground structures, public facilities and related structures.
Education: Graduation from high school or equivalent. Associate of Arts Degree or higher in related field highly desirable.
Education: Graduation from high school or equivalent. Additional qualifying experience may be substituted for the required education on a year-for-year basis up to a maximum of two years. Associate of Arts Degree or higher in related field highly desirable.
Physical Requirements: Moderate and sometimes strenuous exertion required, including sustained walking, standing, bending, kneeling, crawling, climbing, and lifting.
Works in adverse weather conditions from time to time. Exposure to dirt, noise, uneven surfaces, and/or extreme heat or cold when in the field, andfield and may be required to sit for long periods using a computer keyboard and electronic equipmentmouse.
License: Possession of a valid Class "CA" or Class “B” California Driver’s License with a Tank Endorsement (including acceptable driving record)., or the ability to obtain one within 12 months.
Certification: Possession of a Candidates assigned to the Parks Section must possess a Qualified Applicator's Certificate issued by the State of California and be qualified for spraying in categories (B) Landscape Maintenance and (C) Rights-of-Ways, or the ability to obtain one within 12 months.
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD GROUNDSKEEPER GARDENER (PAGE 4)
Candidates assigned to the Streets Section must possess a Wastewater Collection System Maintenance Certificate Grade I issued by the California Water Environment Association, or ability to obtain Certificate within 12 months.
Candidates assigned to the Buildings Section must possess a Playground Safety Inspector Certification issued by the National Recreation and Park Association, or ability to obtain Certificate within 12 months.
R: 0911/2019 08/20136/2024
Approved:
Date:
7/17/2024
CITY OF DALY CITY APPROVED BY:
JOB SPECIFICATION 09/12/2013
CITY COUNCIL:
10/14/2013
RES. NO. 13-
157
LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE WORKER
DEFINITION
Under general supervision of a Public Works Maintenance Supervisor, serves as a lead worker and assumes significant responsibilities for the general maintenance, repairs, and inspections of buildings, exterior hardscape structures, and playground structures.
Supervises organizes, trains, and provides direction to assigned personnel. Performs a variety of skilled tasks that include painting, carpentry, plumbing, roofing, electrical, and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), provides lead direction, personally performs any combination of tasks involved with inspection, construction, repair, preventative, corrective and emergency maintenance of streets, roadways, storm drains, landscaping, irrigation, sports fields, playground Structures, public buildings, facilities and related structures, and performs other duties as assigned. The Lead Public Works Maintenance Workers may be assigned to one of three (3) Public Works Maintenance Sections (Streets, Buildings, or Parks).
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
This classification is distinguished from the Building Maintenance Maintenance Worker I/II classification series by the performance of more skilled and complex public maintenance and repair tasks, and the requirement to oversee, lead and train asubordinate crew of employees. Incumbents may also perform all of the duties customarily performed by a Building Maintenance Maintenance Worker I/II. in any of the assigned areas: Streets, Buildings or Parks.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES
Leads and performs complex skilled maintenance and repair work at the journey level in one or more of the following trades: plumbing, electrical, HVAC, painting, or carpentry.
Repair and maintain door hardware and locks, roofs, fencing, floor and wall covering, and park and playground structures.
Prepares the detailed planning, scheduling and organization of the work of assigned personnel; checks work of assigned crews to see that work is done properly and expeditiously; confers with Public Works Maintenance Supervisor on significant deviations; prepares cost estimates as required; may assist in the preparation of annual budgets, including capital improvements; assists in projecting personnel, equipment, and
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER (PAGE 2)
material needs; opens and completes work orders; maintains records concerning installations, repairs, and the condition of the facility or site of assigned work; makes recommendations for improvements, additions, alterations and repairs; and may inspects work performed by outside contractors; supervise and enforce rules and regulations on assigned personnel; assists in preparing employee performance evaluations;, conducts effective training on the operation and maintenance of equipment operation, care, cleaning and maintenance; and monitors general safety and work site safety; advises on safety precautions and instructs personnel in the technical aspects of work performed; responds
to inquiries and complaints pertaining to the work of the Building Maintenance Section as directed; other duties as assigned.
Operates hand and power tools, and heavy equipment common to landscaping, paving or general construction and building repairs. Reads and interprets construction plans and specifications; and prepares cost estimates; and meets with and overseemonitors assigned personnel, contractors and vendors.
Depending on the Public Works Maintenance Section the employee is assigned may personally perform typical duties in one of the following broad categories:
Parks- safely handles and apply pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, propagates plants, transplants and cares for flowers, ornamental trees and shrubs; installs and maintains irrigation systems;
Streets- safely handles and applies thermoplastic and paint for roadway striping; maintains street pavement, signage, stripping and storm drain facilities; Buildings- repairs and maintains plumbing and heating systems, door hardware and locks, roofs, fencing, sheet rock, paneling, floor and wall covering and general carpentry;
MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of: Methods, materials, tools and equipment required in carpentry, painting, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, other building systems, and associated equipment. Practical aspects of supervisory principles and practices including effectively maintaining a work environment that is free of discrimination and harassment; elements of work scheduling; labor and material cost estimating for Public Works Maintenance projects; basic recordkeeping and budget procedures; standard safety procedures, including working practices and safety orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety pertinent to general or utility construction and maintenance; methods, tools, materials, and types and functions of equipment used safety principles and practices used in building maintenance work; provisions of the provisions of the California Vehicle Code as it applies to the
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER (PAGE 3)
loading and operation of motor vehicles; applicable Federal, State and local laws, codes and regulations.
Ability to: Perform complex skilled maintenance and repair at the journey level in one or more of the following trades: plumbing, electrical, painting, carpentry, or HVAC.
Supervise, schedule, train, and direct the work of assigned personnel; follow oral and written directions; prepare clear and accurate reports; prepare and maintain accurate records; read and interpret plans and specifications; be available in an emergency for night and weekend work; operate and maintain all types of specialized equipment used in the maintenance of public buildings, facilities, and playground structures;, landscaping and street infrastructure; perform skilled and semi-skilled tasks; organize and direct building and park and playground structure, street, and parks maintenance projects; analyze situations effectively and develop appropriate solutions to correct problem areas areas, communicate in a professional manner with various personnel, including personnel from other City Departments, city residents, engineering consultants and industry representatives;, communicate clearly and concisely with contacts , with contacts bo bboth verbally and in writing, as needed,,, as needed, to perform one’s assignments, interact positively and cooperatively with co-workers, respond politely to customers, work as a team member, function under demanding time pressures, respond in a positive manner to supervision, and attend work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
Experience: Three (3) years of increasingly responsible experience in performing skilled work in the maintenance, repair, and/or construction of of streets, roadways, storm drains systems, landscaping, irrigation, sports fields, public facilities, park and playground structures,, public facilities and related structures.
Education: Graduation from high school or equivalent. Associate of Arts Degree or higher in related field desirable.
Physical Requirements: Moderate and sometimes strenuous exertion required, including sustained walking, standing, bending, kneeling, crawling, climbing, and lifting.
Works in adverse weather conditions from time to time. Exposure to dirt, dust, noise, uneven surfaces, and/or extreme heat or cold when in the field, andfield and may be required to sit for long periods using a computer and other electronic equipmentkeyboard and mouse.
License: NonePossession of a valid Class "C" California Driver’s License (including acceptable driving record).
JOB SPECIFICATION
LEAD BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER (PAGE 4)
Certifications: Possession of a Playground Safety Inspector Certification issued by the National Recreation and Park Association, or ability to obtain Certificate within 12 months. valid Class "A" or Class “B” California Driver’s License with a Tank Endorsement (including acceptable driving record), or the ability to obtain one within 12 months.
Candidates assigned to the Parks Section must possess a Qualified Applicator's Certificate issued by the State of California and be qualified for spraying in categories (B) Landscape Maintenance and (C) Rights-of-Ways, or the ability to obtain one within 12 months.
Candidates assigned to the Streets Section must possess a Wastewater Collection System Maintenance Certificate Grade I issued by the California Water Environment Association, or ability to obtain Certificate within 12 months.
Candidates assigned to the Buildings Section must possess a Playground Safety Inspector Certification issued by the National Recreation and Park Association, or ability to obtain Certificate within 12 months.
R: 11/2019 06/2024
Approved:
Date:
7/17/24
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Resolution Adopting Salary Range Reassignments for Specific Executive Management Positions
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving salary range reassignments for specific executive management positions.
Background/Discussion
In an effort to address historical internal inequity amongst executive management/department head positions that have comparable job duties and responsibilities, staff is recommending aligning and reassigning those executive management positions as appropriate.
Staff is recommending reassigning the following classifications from Range M428 to Range M440 of the Executive Management salary schedule effective the first full pay period following City Council adoption of this resolution:
1) Director of Human Resources
2) Director of Recreation Services
3) Library Director
The salary range alignment and reassignment of these Department Heads will be equitable to the Director of Economic & Community Development, Director of Public Works and the Director of Water & Wastewater Resources.
Fiscal Impact
The proposed salary range reassignments for the Director of Human Resources, Director of Recreation Services and Library Director salary will result in a --- (approximately 6.39% increase in ranges for 3 employees) to the General Fund budget for FY 2024.
Summary/Conclusion
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving salary range reassignments for specific Executive Management employees.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or Councilmembers.
Respectfully submitted,
Timothy J. Nevin Thomas J. Piccolotti
Director of Finance and City Manager
Administrative Services
City Council Agenda Report Item #
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: Authorize Temporary Assignment and Reimbursable Compensation of the CoInterim Executive Director for the San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Care Emergency Medical Services Group (JPA)
Recommended Action
The City Council authorize Fire Chief Ron Myers to continue performing in the capacity as the San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Care Joint Powers Authority Temporary Co-Interim Executive Director and approve a management incentive compensation of 10% of the Fire Chief’s base salary. The compensation shall be fully reimbursed to the City of Daly City by the JPA Board.
Background
The San Mateo County Pre-Hospital Emergency Medical Services Group (“JPA”) is a joint powers authority that provides first responder pre-hospital emergency medical services in San Mateo County. The JPA provides a mechanism to monitor and improve the quality of advanced life support services throughout San Mateo County. It serves to track the effectiveness of the public/private partnership between the JPA and the Countywide ambulance providers under contract with San Mateo County.
Since June of 2022, and the impending retirement of the Executive Director, Daly City Fire Chief Ron Myers has been serving as Interim Co-Executive Director at no cost to the JPA and has not received any extra compensation for serving in this capacity. Because the Chief has been a part of the JPA for an extended period, he has the ability, knowledge and experience to oversee the activities and operations of the JPA along with the other co-interim Executive Director.
Discussion
The Fire Chief as the Co-Executive Director would continue managing the day-to-day activities and operations, overseeing budget, fiscal planning and accounting, including addressing significant projects and issues such as the build out and replacement of the countywide radio communications infrastructure system, as well as the ongoing interactions with the County regarding the countywide dispatch services. The Interim Co-Executive Director responsibilities and activities would continue until a permanent Executive Director is appointed after a short transition period has occurred.
Fiscal Impact
There is no cost or additional funding required, as the Pre-Hospital Care JPA will fully reimburse all compensation and expenses associated with the assignment.
City Council Agenda Report
Subject:
Meeting Date:
Summary/Conclusion
Recommend that the City Council authorize the temporary assignment of the Fire Chief as the CoInterim Executive Director and approve the management incentive compensation of 10% of the base salary to be reimbursed by the JPA until a permanent Executive Director is appointed by the Pre-Hospital Care JPA and a short transition period has occurred.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Mayor or City Council Members.
Respectfully submitted,
Ron Myers Thomas J. Piccolotti
Fire Chief City Manager
City Council Meeting Agenda Report Item # _____
Meeting Date: July 22, 2024
Subject: General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 –
Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Recommended Action
Approve the General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22- 015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424, certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project, and accept the Water Supply Assessment prepared for the project.
Planning Commission Discussion
On June 4, 2024, the Planning Commission voted 3-0 (Commissioner Satorre abstained) to recommend that the City Council approve the project. The Commissioners expressed support for the project and its benefits to the local economy of Daly City. The Planning Commissioners asked when construction was anticipated to start and whether the applicant had financing for the project.
The applicant stated this depended on market conditions and ability to obtain financing to start construction depends on securing major tenants. Commissioner Catuar asked if the parking could possibly used by the public during hours the office building was non-operational. The applicant responded that it would largely depend on what the ultimate building tenant would prefer. Nels DeLander, representing NorCal Carpenters Union, expressed overall support for the project and a desire that the project could provide job and apprenticeship opportunities for labor members.
Background
The applicant proposes to demolish an existing five-story office building and three-level parking garage and construct a new office building with parking structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard (see Attachment A – Site Location). The project site is currently developed as the Serramonte Business Center, which includes an 80,652 square foot, five-story office building and 112,500 square foot three-level, 293 parking space, parking garage. The existing building was constructed in 1982.
The project, as proposed, requires the following entitlements:
1. General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan designation for a small portion of the project site from Commercial - Retail and Office (C-RO) to Commercial -Office (C-O);
2. Rezoning entire project site from C-1 Light Commercial, C-O Commercial Office, and Planned Development 8 (PD8) to Planned Development 8A (PD-8A);
3. Design Review approval for the site and building design;
4. Certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and
5. Adoption of a Water Supply Assessment for the project.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 2 of 19 On May 22, 2023, the City Council reviewed and approved the Preliminary Plan for the project which included the proposed land use, circulation, and overall site design.
Project Description
The project applicant proposes to demolish an existing three-level parking garage and five-story office building and construct a new office building with parking structure at a 3.2-acre site. The applicant is requesting approval of two alternatives for the project. Alternative one would entail construction of an eight-story, 166-foot-tall office building over a three-story parking podium. The total building area would be 280,000 square feet (see Attachment B - Commercial Office Plans).
Alternative two would entail the construction of a five-story, 118-foot tall, medical office building with a total of 180,000 square feet and would be placed within the same building footprint as the business office building (see Attachment C - Medical Office Plans). Under either alternative, the same six-level parking garage would be constructed providing approximately 900 parking spaces.
The garage size would appear as a six-level structure from Hickey Boulevard and two and a half level structure from Serravista Avenue.
General Plan Amendment
A General Plan Amendment is proposed to change the land use of the northwest portion of the project site from the Commercial - Retail and Office (C-RO) land use designation to the Commercial -Office (C-O) land use designation. As shown in the illustration below, this General Plan amendment pertains only to s small portion at the northwest corner of the site, as the bulk of the site is already designated C-O, a designation which was established at the time of the construction of the office building that exist today. The amendment is necessary to ensure the entire site is designated C-O.
Planned Development Rezone
The proposed project requires the approval of an amendment to the existing Planned Development zoning for the site, PD8, and rezoning portion of the site that are presently zoned C-1 Light Commercial and C-O Office Commercial into a new Planned Development 8A zone (see Attachment D – Draft Planned Development Standards). A graphic illustrating these changes is provided on the following page.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 3 of 19 The Planned Development amendment provides the City Council with an opportunity to evaluate the proposal in the context of the existing on-site and adjacent uses and evaluate if the proposed project merits approval. In so determining, the Council should evaluate if the new building and parking structure would be compatible with existing uses, if infrastructure exists to serve the site, and if the provision of parking is adequate and, as designed, would not have a detrimental impact to the adjacent neighborhood.
The Council should note that the subject site is presently occupied by an 80,652 square foot office building consisting of medical and commercial office uses. After redevelopment of the parking garage and office building, the expanded parking and office building would offer either medical or office use space. As the existing and proposed uses on the project site are essentially the same, staff feels the proposed use would be compatible with existing uses.
Design Review
Design Review
Design Review approval pursuant to Chapter 17.45 (Design Review) of the Zoning Code is required.
The proposed project must meet the following findings:
1. The plans are in best interest of public health, safety and general welfare of the community;
2. General site considerations, including site layout, open space and topography, orientation and location of buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, heights, walls, fences, public safety and similar elements have been design to provide a desirable environment;
3. The architectural design has considered the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, colors, screening of exterior appurtenances, exterior lighting and signing and similar elements have been incorporated in order to insure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of other adjacent buildings;
4. General landscape considerations of Chapter 17.41, Landscaping, have been provided to ensure visual relief, to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 4 of 19 According to the applicant, the building’s massing is articulated in different ways to reflect the unique hillside character and be respectful of the varied scales and massing of the mixed-used neighborhoods. A strong emphasis is placed on the vertical hierarchy of the building massing.
Architectural expression evolved from the garage base to the body of the building and roofline.
Appropriately expressed transparency of the glass facade is reinforced by skeletal frames of opaque finishes, aluminum, and solar-control elements. This animated face highlights the movement rhythm of the freeway and Hickey Blvd. Additionally, multi-level view decks are strategically placed and aligned with the glass building corners that provide belief to the building massing, but also create outdoor amenities within the building, on this tight site. The new office building will present itself as a visual maker of the neighborhood and for the vehicular traffic along the I-280 Freeway and from the west side of the city. The dual-tone, white and grey, Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) panels at the main building body form a solid frame, anchoring the building to the hillside. The building corners will be framed with painted grey and off white, perforated metal panels and feature more glass panels for higher transparency, posing a visually interesting juxtaposition with the main body and help to break down the building scale. Two types of glazing are being proposed in this project - the main body glazing will have a grey-blue appearance, creating a sophisticated feel to the overall building design; the corners will have a silver-blue appearance, creating a series of lighter volumes around the building. Sunshade devices are being applied at west and south-facing elevations to improve building daylight quality and energy performance. A double-story lobby will be placed on the southeast corner where the building meets grade at Serravista Avenue; two corner entrances will be created to welcome people coming from both the street and the parking garage.
The parking garage will be largely screened by existing landscaping on Hickey Boulevard, perforated metal panels will be placed strategically to dress up the garage, this design also forms a strong base for the office building above. Two additional levels of parking structure will be built east of the office building, large street trees will be placed along Serravista Avenue to minimize pretenses in the area.
The stair tower will mimic the building design language and feature some glass panels facing Hickey Boulevard. The service yard will be located on the east side of the building, equipment and loading area will be screened with architectural and landscape elements to minimize the visual impact.
Staff supports the site layout and building architectural design and materials for the proposed building (commercial office and medical office options). The contemporary design and materials offer a visually interesting structure as viewed from adjacent streets and the site layout, open space and the orientation of the building provides a desirable environment for the public and building tenants.
Given the quality of the proposed building design, staff recommends no Conditions of Approval related to architecture of either building scenario.
The City Council should be aware that the project applicant has requested a Design Review Permit approval period of ten years. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission and City Council grant the request for an extension of four years, allowing for a five-year Design Review approval period (Code required one-year approval period plus four years). The entitlement approval period is outlined in the new Planned Development requirements for the project. The Applicant may request additional extensions by seeking approval from the Planning Commission and City Council.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 5 of 19 Landscape and Open Space
The project site is located within the lower southern hills of Daly City with existing trees flanking the site to the east within the I-280 corridor. Large existing evergreen trees along the southwest edge of the site will remain and be protected. According to applicant, the plant palette is to be drought tolerant, and work with the wind and fog common in this part of Daly City. Special attention is paid to native species such as Western Redbud, Ceanothus and Berkeley Sedge. Wind resistant species such as New Zealand Christmas Tree, Arbutus Marina and Holly Oak will be used to create wind breaks and increase the amount of outdoor usable space. Color is added into the palette with species such as Pink Muhly Grass, New Zealand Flax and Star Jasmine.
Irregular shapes creating triangulated tilted planes are used to create identity within the Urban Plaza which also serves as a vehicular drop off. Useable space is created with large triangular mounds with seating carved within the mound for a protected and calming lunch time collaborative experience.
Smaller seating areas are created from the parking and public access areas into the building lobbies, creating a hierarchy of spaces when combined with the larger seating areas within the mounds.
Attention is paid to differing paving materials to create interest in the paving and provide visual queues when approaching the plaza itself, and aid in wayfinding from parking/ public access areas.
Staff concludes that the project complies with the General landscape considerations of Chapter
17.41, providing open space and landscaping to ensure visual relief, to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public (Municipal Code Design Review 17.45.080 – Findings).
Transportation Study
A transportation impact analysis was completed by the transportation consultant TJKM to evaluate both the proposed commercial office (Alternative 1) and medical office (Alternative 2) alternatives (see Attachment E – Traffic Impact Study Report). The study evaluated project trip generation under existing conditions, existing plus project alternative 1 conditions, existing plus project alternative 2, and cumulative (2035) plus project alternatives 1 and 2 conditions.
Under existing plus project alternative 1 and 2 conditions, the study determined that 15 of the 17 study intersection will operate at acceptable Level of Service (LOS) D or better during both peak hours for both existing plus project alternatives. Evaluating cumulative (2035) plus project alternative 1 and 2 conditions, 14 of the 17 intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours.
Based on the analysis of the alternative 1 and 2 conditions, City staff evaluated proposed measures to reduce delay and have required the project applicant implement transportation improvement measures that are included in the Conditions of Approval of the project.
Parking and Circulation
The proposed parking count for both the commercial office and medical office building will remain the same. The project would provide a total of approximately 900 parking spaces. As per current State requirements, 450 parking spaces would be electric vehicle (EV) spaces. Of the 450 spaces, 90
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 6 of 19 spaces would be Level 2 (240 Volt) spaces, 90 would be EV Level 1 (120 Volt) spaces and 270 spaces would be EV capable (infrastructure installed except for wires). The remaining 450 parking spaces would not have any special parking designation, except for required accessible spaces. A total of eight short-term bicycle parking spaces and 46 long-term bicycle parking spaces would also be provided.
Site access and parking would be the same under both the Commercial Office and Medical Office Building options. The project (under either option) would include two entry points for employees and visitors to access the podium parking and the parking structure. Access to the podium parking would be provided primarily from Hickey Boulevard with drop-off at the interior lobby. Access to the parking structure east of the office building would be provided primarily via a private driveway off Serravista Avenue. A curbside drop-off space would be provided on Serravista Avenue, connecting the sidewalk and the new entry plaza leading to the building’s main lobby. A landscaped pathway would link the lobby to the elevator/stairway of the parking structure to the east. Delivery trucks traveling to the site would enter and exit via the Serravista Avenue driveway to access the singular loading area east of the building within the service yard. Internal drive aisles (24-feet in width) would provide vehicle and truck circulation around the perimeter of the proposed building.
Additionally, a 20-foot-wide utility easement driveway would be constructed on the north side of the first parking level to provide the City access to the re-aligned underground sewer lines and storm drain. The driveway would be accessible via the garage entry off Hickey Boulevard and through a sloped driveway to Serravista Avenue.
Shadow Analysis
A shadow study was conducted by the applicant for the project to assess the potential impacts of the proposed building and parking structure on the existing streets and properties (see Attachment F – Shadow Study). The study included both development scenarios, an eight-story commercial office development and five-story medical office. The shadow study was conducted using a combination of satellite images, digital mapping tools, and 3D modeling and simulation software. Data was collected for different times of the day, including 9am and 3pm during the spring equinox, summer solstice, fall equinox, and winter solstice, to capture variations in shadow patterns throughout the year. The results of the study found that in the morning, shadows from the new building structure are casting primarily towards the northwest side, over a portion of the adjacent shopping center and Hickey Boulevard. No shadow impacts were found on the existing residential homes to the south of project site. During the winter seasons, shadows from the new development tilt slightly toward the northdirection, but generally over public right of ways up the hill. The shadows from the low-angle sun recede gradually as the morning progresses. In the afternoon, shadows from the new building shift towards the east as the sun moves westward, over a portion of Hickey Boulevard and the commercial buildings across the street to the north of the project site. The shadow study concluded that there is minimal impact over the existing residential neighborhood south of Serravista Avenue. Only a portion of the public ROW and adjacent commercial uses will be shaded for part of the day.
San Francisco International Airport Influence Area
The project site is located within the Airport Influence Area (AIA) of the San Francisco International Airport (SFO). Properties within the AIA may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (e.g., noise, vibration, and odors).
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 7 of 19 The airport/land use compatibility of a proposed development or land use policy action is determined by comparing the proposed development or land use policy action with the safety compatibility criteria, noise compatibility criteria, and airspace protection/height limitation criteria in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). Any proposed land use policy actions, including the proposed General Plan rezoning, that affect properties within the ALUCP Airport Influence Area B boundary in Daly City (such as the project site), must be referred to the C/CAG Board for an ALUCP consistency review and determination.
On December 8, 2022, the Board considered the ALUC recommendation and evaluated the consistency of the project with the relevant airport/land use compatibility policies and criteria contained in the adopted ALUCP. The C/CAG Board determined the proposed General Plan amendment, rezoning, and related project entitlements were consistent with relevant ALUCP policies with a required Condition of Approval related to real estate disclosure requirements regarding the site’s location within the AIA and the requirement that the project undergo FAA review as described in 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 for both (1) the permanent structures and (2) any temporary cranes or other equipment taller than the permanent buildings which would be required to construct those structures.
Utilities Infrastructure Capacity
The City’s Public Works Department and Department of Water and Wastewater Resources have evaluated the proposal and determined that adequate water and sewer infrastructure exists to serve the subject site. The Fire Department has also reviewed the project and has no objections.
Fiscal Analysis and Impacts
The construction of the proposed building addition would add an incremental demand for City services. Prior to project completion, the project applicant will be required to pay building permit, plan check, and AB 1600 fees to the City. The project will increase property tax and business license taxes.
Environmental Assessment
After completing an initial study for the project, staff has determined that the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project is appropriate pursuant to Section 15070 of the Public Resources Code, as specified under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (see Attachment G – Final Mitigation Negative Declaration). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was required for this project in the following resources: Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils and Noise and Vibration. Implementation of these MMRPs reduce the impact from the project to less-than-significant (Section 21081.6 of CEQA) (see Attachment H – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program).
Public Comment
The draft MND environmental document was prepared and was circulated for public comment for 30-days (from May 21, 2024, to June 20, 2024). Staff received three public comments, one from Caltrans, one from a member of the Pedestrian Bicycle Advisory Committee (PBAC), and one from
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 8 of 19 a neighborhood resident. These comments were addressed in the CEQA responses to public comments document. (see Attachment I – Responses to Public Comments).
Staff received comments from Caltrans dated June 19, 2024. Caltrans comments are as follows.
Caltrans advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ Right of Way (ROW) requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. Project work that requires movement of oversized or excessive load vehicles on State roadways requires a transportation permit that is issued by Caltrans. A Transportation Demand Management plan is required for the project.
Finally, if any Caltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction.
Staff received a public comment email on May 31, 2024, from a member of the Pedestrian Bicycle Advisory Committee, recommending pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements for the adjacent streets surrounding the project. The comments received from Alay Uy, were shared with the Planning Commission prior to the Planning Commission hearing held on June 4, 2024, but Commissioners had no comments regarding these suggestions at the meeting. Staff evaluated the recommendations and agreed to amend the conditions of approval for the project to have the applicant install high-visibility crosswalk striping on the east approach crosswalk of Gellert Boulevard and Serravista Avenue. In addition, staff is coordinating with Samtrans to require the installation of two bus shelters and improvements, if determined to be feasible, for the #121 and #130 line bus stops located on Gellert Boulevard southbound and Hickey Boulevard eastbound.
Staff received a letter on June 5, 2024, from a neighbor located at 49 Berta Circle expressing concerns about noise, pollution, traffic and views. Berta Circle is the street south of Serravista Avenue.
Concerns about noise, pollution, traffic and views were evaluated in the CEQA-Mitigated Negative Declaration report. Noise and pollution were addressed in the Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Program required for the project. The mitigation measures for the project construction noise and pollution will reduce these impacts to less-than-significant. A traffic study was conducted evaluating the traffic impacts of the proposed project and found no significant impacts to traffic from the proposed project. The applicant will be required to implement Transportation Demand Management measures for the development to reduce single-vehicle occupancy commuting. In addition, the applicant is required to implement pedestrian, traffic and transit safety improvements as a condition of approval for the project. Views were evaluated in the Aesthetics section of the environmental document and the study determined that the project would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas. Scenic vistas are defined as the coastline, San Bruno Mountain, and scenic corridors within Daly City. Intermittent views of San Bruno Mountain from public roadways in the project vicinity would remain with the proposed development.
All comments received during the public comment period were addressed in a response in the subsequent final MND for the project, that is presented to the City Council for approval (see Attachment I – Responses to Public Comments).
Findings
The Planning Commission has found that, as conditioned, the approval of General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Zone Change PD-10-22-015932 and Design Review DRPage 47 of 567 City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 9 of 19 4-18-13424, would comply with Title 17 (Zoning) of the Daly City Municipal Code. Approval of the proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing in or working in the neighborhood or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. These findings are based on the following facts:
1. In accordance with Title 17 of the Daly City Municipal Code, as well as applicable State zoning enabling legislation, the City Council conducted a public hearing on July 22, 2024; notice of said hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on July 12, 2024, posting and first class mailing to property owners within 300 feet;
2. The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the proposal under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on the Initial Study prepared by a qualified professional consultant, has determined that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that the project may have a significant impact, given the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the project. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act;
3. The proposed office building complies with applicable provisions of the Title 17 (Zoning) of the Daly City Municipal Code, including Chapter 17.48 Amendments, Chapter 17.28 – Planned Development, and Chapter 17.45 – Design Review;
4. The proposed office building merits design review approval, as the building would be compatible with existing adjacent uses, adequate utility and infrastructural capacity exists within close proximity to serve the site, and the provision of parking is adequate and, as designed, would not have a detrimental impact to the adjacent neighborhood;
5. General site considerations, including site layout, open space and topography, orientation and location of buildings, vehicular access, circulation and parking, setbacks, heights, walls, public safety and similar elements have been designed to provide a desirable environment;
6. General architectural considerations have been incorporated in order to ensure the compatibility of this development with its design concept and the character of on-site signage.
These considerations include, but are not limited to, the character, scale and quality of the design, the architectural relationship with the site and other buildings, building materials, and colors;
7. General landscape considerations of Chapter 17.41, Landscaping, will be provided to ensure visual relief, to complement buildings and structures and to provide an attractive environment for the enjoyment of the public; and
8. The project will minimize the risk to existing public improvements and adjacent private property by providing controlled stormwater runoff from the site to City facilities in full compliance with Order R-2 NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 and Order No. 2010-0014- DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 10 of 19 Conditions of Approval
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezoning PD-10-22-015932 and Design Review DR-4- 18-13424, subject to the following conditions and Daly City General Conditions of Approval. Minor deviations from the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Division. Significant deviations will require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council.
A . DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
General
1. The design review permit approval shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of City Council approval. The approvals shall terminate if a building permit has not been obtained and construction commenced within one-year of City Council approval of the project or if the applicant fails to obtain a valid business license.
2. The design review permit shall be valid only in conjunction with plans submitted and approved by the City Council. Any significant modifications and changes to the plans shall be treated as an amendment and shall be subject to review by a Council Committee appointed by the Mayor.
3. All buildings, any applicable retaining walls, fences, and trash enclosure materials and colors must match those as approved. High quality materials shall be utilized and final finishes shall be approved by the Director of Economic and Community Development.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project sponsor shall file Form 7460-1 with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and provide to the City of Daly City an FAA “Determination of No Hazard”.
5. The project sponsor shall comply with the real estate disclosure requirements outlined in Policy IP-1 of the Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the environs of San Francisco International Airport (SFO ALUCP).
6. Prior to Final Certificate of Occupancy, the project sponsor shall be required to paint all above ground devices for all new development, as specified below, and shall note this on the construction drawings submitted for Building Permits.
• Domestic water above ground piping and devices are Precaution Blue #22 • Irrigation water above ground piping and devices are Billiard Table Green #178
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 11 of 19 • Fire water above ground piping and devices are Dunn Edwards Safety Red #221 • Fire Hydrants are Rustoleum Safety Yellow #242258
Building and Site Design
7. The trash enclosure shall be constructed from concrete (CMU is acceptable) and shall receive design elements similar to those of the medical office building, including color, materials, and roof design. The enclosure’s doors shall receive a powder-coated metal door painted to match the enclosure’s wall color. The capacity, design, and location of the structure shall be approved by both the Planning Division and Republic Services prior to incorporation in the project plans that are submitted to the Building Division for permit issuance.
8. Backflow preventers shall be concealed and/or screened from public view to the satisfaction of the Daly City Community and Economic Development Director prior to issuance of building permit.
Landscaping
9. The project landscape plans shall incorporate irrigated vine or other climbing plants to soften the first floor exterior adjacent to the project parking lot.
Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Merger
10. The applicant shall obtain a Lot Line Adjustment / Lot Merger approval from the City prior to the issuance of building permit.
Stormwater Treatment
11. The applicant shall develop and submit a stormwater management plan that illustrates full compliance with Section C.3 of Order R-2-2009-0074 NPDES Permit No. CAS612008. The project must comply with Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, the statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit.
12. The applicant shall receive approval of the stormwater management plan from a third-party reviewer appointed by the City prior to building permit submittal. The applicant shall pay the entire cost of the third-party reviewer.
13. All stormwater treatment facilities shall be inspected during construction to ensure eventual compliance with the stormwater management plan. The applicant shall pay the entire cost of these inspections.
14. The applicant shall enter into an Operation and Maintenance Agreement with the City to ensure long-term maintenance and servicing by the Property Owner of stormwater site design and treatment control measures according to the approved Operation and Maintenance Plan.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 12 of 19
15. The applicant shall arrange and pay for final inspection of installed treatment measure by the City’s Special Inspector within 45 days of installation or project construction completion, whichever comes first.
B. BUILDING DIVISION
16. Hours of operation for all construction work associated with the subject project shall be Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. For work in the Hickey Boulevard right-of-way, the construction hours would be limited to Monday through Friday between the hours of 9:00 am to 3:00 pm. If the project’s general contractor wishes to work outside the allowable hours, on weekends, or on City holidays, on a regular basis, this must be approved in advance by the City Council and the City Manager. For special requests on a limited basis, the Building Official can approve alternate construction hours for the project not within or impacting the ROW. The applicant will be making only special requests, on a limited basis, to the Building Official to work on construction outside of allowable hours, not within or impacting the ROW. The Building Official must be notified and approval given, in writing, in advance of said work.
17. At Building Permit Submittal, the applicant shall apply for a Building Permit for Site Improvement work to review and inspect all Building Code-related items. This includes structural, architectural, accessibility, and et cetera. The Building Division review will not occur under the Site Improvement Permit.
C. PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING DIVISION
General
18. All improvements shall be consistent with the plans approved by the City Engineer and the Conditions of Approval. All improvements shall meet the latest California Building Code, California Fire Code, Daly City Municipal Code, and the City Standards and Specifications.
19. Provide “will serve letters” from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for gas and electric services and Republic Services for solid waste collection services.
20. All improvements shall be installed, inspected and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of occupancy permits. In addition, as-built record plans of all improvements shall be submitted in a form acceptable to the City Engineer prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
21. All electrical and telecommunications services shall be provided through underground connections. There shall be no overhead drops. All existing overhead services and supporting poles along the project frontage and/or on the private property shall be removed, at the applicant’s expense.
22. All utility services shall be underground. Said improvements shall conform to City of Daly City and affected Agency’s standards.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 13 of 19
23. All plans shall be accompanied by all required calculations and studies including geotechnical and impact studies to justify design signed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer.
24. Grading and improvement plan review and approval by the City Engineer are required before any City permit is issued. The improvement plans shall include details for on-site and offsite improvements for vehicular and pedestrian access, parking, traffic signs and markings, utility service connections, modifications and extensions of the City’s sewer, water, storm drain, safety lighting, landscaping, and other public service facilities.
25. Securities for all improvements (on-site and off-site), and applicable fees and charges, shall be submitted with any building permits. The applicant shall obtain all required permits before commencing work.
26. The applicant and/or Contractor shall have a project sign with a 24-hour Project contact information for public concerns such as off-site tracking, dust control, noise complaints, ground shaking and any related construction activities. The complaints and responses shall be logged, and copies provided to the City Engineer with action status on a weekly basis.
27. Provide erosion and storm water pollution plan incorporating best management practices, including operation and maintenance provisions per the requirements applicable at the time of construction permit application. During the wet/rainy season (October 1 to April 30) the developer shall submit a revised erosion control plan as necessary (every five working days) or as required by the City Engineer and/or his representative.
28. Concurrent with each demolition, grading and drainage permit submittal, or as a part of the Improvement Plan package, the Applicant shall prepare a dust control plan. The plan shall conform to the City Standards and comply with the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Best Management Practices for dust control. The Applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.
29. No permanent building encroachment including but not limited to: awnings, canopies, marquees, signs, windows, balconies, architectural features and mechanical equipment shall be allowed in the Right-of-Way without the written authorization of the City Engineer.
30. The project’s electrical transformer shall not be installed within the public right-of-way.
31. The applicant shall enter into a Landscape Maintenance Agreement in a form acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure the Property Owner will provide long-term maintenance of all street trees, landscaping, irrigation, and pedestrian-scale lighting installed in the public rightof-way. Design of planting and irrigation system shall minimize the extent of irrigation lines, controllers, and valves in the public right-of-way and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 14 of 19
32. Applicant shall provide justification for the tiebacks proposed in the Public Right-Of-Way (ROW) for the City to review and approve. A shoring study to consider alternatives to tiebacks in the Public’s ROW shall be prepared for various alternatives along with the pros and cons associated with each alternative. Conceptual layouts and details shall be provided for each alternative. Shoring study shall be signed and stamped by the Structural Engineer.
Applicant shall also clarify how shoring will be performed for areas adjacent to neighboring properties outside of the ROW. Applicant acknowledges that tiebacks may not be approved in the Public Right-of-Way and that alternative shoring methods that do not encroach into the public ROW may need to be utilized to construct the project. Applicant shall be responsible for all cost associated with the review and evaluation of tie-back justification request and additional deposit may be required.
Site
33. The applicant shall install monolithic curb, gutter, and sidewalk over the entire frontage of the development to the nearest expansion joints or score lines. Sidewalks fronting the property on public streets and within the development shall be a minimum 5.5 feet in width including the top of curb. The improvements shall be ADA compliant and to current City Standards and Specifications. A minimum 5-foot wide Public Access Easement (PAE) shall be provided over portions of the pedestrian sidewalk located within private property/adjacent to the proposed drop off zone along Serravista Ave.
34. Amenities to support bicycle parking shall be provided. Bicycle parking shall be accessible directly from street level without the use of an elevator or stairs.
35. Curb ramps in and around the project site shall utilize the case types in the Caltrans Standard Plans.
36. The applicant shall repair and/or replace additional areas of street pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter, streetlights, manhole, catch basins, or any other public infrastructure within the right-of-way damaged by construction activities associated with the project (utility installation, etc.) as required by the City Inspector during construction. Such repair shall be per the City’s Standards and Specifications.
37. Applicant shall provide permeable pavement designs, designed by a professional engineer, that supports all-weather driving conditions and can support imposed loads as required by the City.
38. All pervious pavements shall be maintained in perpetuity under an approved maintenance plan that is recorded on the property.\
Grading
39. Grading exceeding 50 cubic yards shall require approval of plans and a grading permit. A licensed Civil Engineer shall prepare the grading plans and erosion control plan in conformance with a soil report prepared by a licensed soil engineer or qualified civil engineer in compliance with the NPDES requirements prior to any development on the property.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 15 of 19
40. Grading plans shall be reviewed by an independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist as well as the City Engineer; a letter of compliance from the independent qualified Consulting Engineer or Geologist shall be provided to Engineering prior to the issuance of any permit. The Engineer and/or Geologist, of record, shall be present on-site during the excavation and grading phases of the project and shall submit a written certification that the project civil plans has been implemented as approved.
41. The applicant shall provide fail-safe conditions for catastrophic events such as 100-year storms, seismic events, system overflows or failures. Drainage swales shall be provided at the top, intermediate and bottom of slopes and embankments to prevent erosion and degradation of slopes. The project geotechnical report shall include appropriate recommendations regarding the protection of existing and proposed slopes.
42. The soils report shall be finalized and resubmitted prior to any parcel or final map approval, and prior to building permit issuance. As required by the engineering division, the applicant shall be responsible for the costs associated with a third-party peer review of soils reports provided for buildings or subdivision, and the applicant’s soils engineer shall address and incorporate the recommendations of the third-party peer review. Prior to subdivision improvement or building permit issuance, the applicant’s soils engineer shall provide a letter stating that they have reviewed such plans and the plans incorporate the recommendations contained in their report.
Stormwater/Utility
43. Provide a storm drain study of the project. A storm drain utility report containing hydraulic calculations for the proposed storm drain system, that includes both public and private onsite drainage, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Along with the report, a letter from the engineer of record indicating that the proposed storm drain system does not increase runoff above the pre-development condition shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
44. Runoff calculations shall be provided verifying that post development stormwater runoff from the site does not exceed the pre-development stormwater runoff. Additional stormwater runoff generated from the design storm as a result of this development shall be retained onsite.
45. Drainage from the site to a public storm drain system or street shall not flow over any sidewalk. On site drainage retention shall be provided to limit the flow rate entering the City’s storm drain system to the pre-development rate. The retention facility shall accommodate the excess runoff from a storm of 10-year frequency and two-hour duration.
46. All stormwater retention, stormwater treatment, or other stormwater BMP improvements shall be located outside of the public right-of-way and maintained by the property owner. All privately owned and maintained improvements shall be located outside of the public right-ofway. There shall be no private improvements within the public right-of-way.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 16 of 19
47. The applicant shall be financially responsible for all project-related storm drainage improvements on- and off-site, as required and approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City Standards.
48. Full trash capture devices approved by the City Engineer shall be installed on the drainage system.
49. Storm drain laterals and mains shall be CCTV’ed at the end of construction. Owner is responsible for providing videos of laterals/mains prior to the City Engineer’s permit signoff/acceptance. If cleanouts are utilized instead of manholes or drainage inlets, it is up to the owner to make required changes to provide camera access if access is not available via cleanouts.
Traffic
50. Install flashing pedestrian crossing system at the intersection of Gellert Boulevard at Serravista Avenue for the crosswalk on the south approach.
51. Install pedestrian bulb-outs at the northeast, southeast and southwest corners of Gellert Boulevard at Serravista Avenue.
52. Applicant shall provide an approved Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan and implement any required measures to meet City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County’s TDM Policy.
53. Samtrans bus stop improvements: STOP 332612 (Hickey Blvd & Gellert Blvd) and STOP 332110 (Gellert Blvd & Hickey Blvd). The applicant shall coordinate with the City and Samtrans to implement bus stop improvements including, if determined to be feasible, the relocation of the stops and installation of bus shelters and amenities at each of the respective stop locations. Applicant shall dedicate to the City any additional public right-of-way required for the construction of the bus shelter and shall pay for the cost for all bus stop improvements.
The City, in consultation with Samtrans, shall determine the appropriate design of the shelters.
Prior to submittal for Building permits, the applicant shall submit truck turning templates for all turning movements from Hickey Boulevard into the right turn pocket and into the parking structure to DWWR and Public Works staff for review and approval. All such bus stop improvements shall be installed and accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the Certificate of the Occupancy for any office space.
54. Remove the Stop bar and legend for the southbound left-turn lane at Gellert Boulevard at Serravista Avenue
55. The applicant shall install a high-visibility crosswalk (thermoplastic) on the east approach of the intersection at Gellert Boulevard and Serravista Avenue.
Mapping
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 17 of 19
56. Prior to Building Permit issuance, a parcel map will be prepared and recorded to merge the three (3) parcels into one (1) parcel. Please contact the Planning Division to apply for a minor subdivision to merge the parcels.
57. All ROW dedication/easement language shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
58. The applicant shall prepare all necessary documents required for recordation of proposed easement abandonments and/or for proposed easements dedications. All easement abandonments and dedications shall be accepted by the City of Daly City City Council prior to issuance of Building Permits.
59. The width and locations of Public Easements shall be specified for review and approval by all utility companies and the City Engineer.
Permit
60. An encroachment permit shall be required to be issued by the Public Works Department for all work proposed within the public right-of-way.
61. The applicant shall provide verification, in writing, that the joint trench design has been reviewed and approved by each utility company.
D. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND WASTEWATER RESOURCES
62. The proposed project Tie backs shall follow the requirements set forth by DPW and DWWR.
63. No Tie backs shall be permitted within the sewer easement.
64. A 20-foot utility easement shall be provided to the North San Mateo County Sanitation District for the new sewer routing. The new easement shall follow all requirements set by the Daly City Engineering Department.
65. All improvements shall be consistent with the approved plans and the Conditions of Approval.
All improvements shall meet the latest Daly City Municipal Code, and the City Standards and Specifications.
66. The applicant shall contribute a fair-share cost of the new 30-inch relief sewer crossing I280. The fair share contribution shall be based on the added flows relative to the additional capacity needed for the new I-280 crossing as determined by the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources.
67. The applicant shall coordinate review of the existing on-site sanitary sewer system with the Department of Water and Wastewater Resources (DWWR). The existing sewer shall be protected in place and always accessible until the new sewer system is constructed, approved, and accepted by DWWR.
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 18 of 19 E. FIRE DEPARTMENT
68. The specific Fire and Building Code requirements for this project will be determined upon submittal and review of the completed and approved construction plans. Work shall not commence without approved plans. All inspections require a copy of the "APPROVED" plans and job card available at the job site.
69. Demolition/Construction shall comply with California Fire Code Chapter 33, Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition.
70. Fire sprinkler system is required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.
71. Complete Alternate Methods & Materials Request form (AMMR) with NCFA for alternate proposal to provide Class I standpipes in lieu of travel distance requirements.
72. Provide fire flow information per CFC, Appendix B.
73. Monitored Fire alarm system with Emergency Voice/Alarm Communication is required.
Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.
74. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage is required per CFC 510. Submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.
75. Fire Command Center is required per CFC. Location of Fire Command Center shall be coordinated with NCFA.
76. Firefighter Breathing Air Replenishment System is required per DCMC and CFC Appendix L.
77. A smoke control system is required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate permit. A smoke control study is to be performed by a qualified design professional.
78. Hood & Duct fire extinguishing system may be required. Submit plans to NCFA under separate permit.
79. Key Box is required. Apply for approved hardware at NCFA Administration.
80. Portable fire extinguishers(s) are required. Mount fire extinguishers 3-5 feet above floor.
81. Hazardous material use, storage, or operations permit may be required.
82. Elevators shall be sized to allow for approved EMS gurneys.
Recommendations
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council take the following actions:
City Council Agenda Report
General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezone PD-10-22-015932, and Design Review DR-4-18-13424 – July 22, 2024 Office Building and Parking Structure at 455 Hickey Boulevard Page 19 of 19
1. Adopt the Findings as outlined herein;
2. Certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project
3. Adopt the Water Supply Assessment prepared for the project (see ISMND Appendix H); and
4. Approve General Plan Amendment GPA-05-24-16525, Planned Development Rezoning PD10-22-015932 and Design Review DR-4-18-13424, subject to the Conditions of Approved outlined herein.
Staff is available to provide any additional information desired by the Council members.
Respectfully submitted,
Sam Fielding Tatum Mothershead
Associate Planner Director of Economic and Community
Development
Attachments
Attachment A – Site Location
Attachment B – Commercial Office Plans
Attachment C – Medical Office Plans
Attachment D – Draft Planned Development Standards
Attachment E – Traffic Impact Study Report
Attachment F – Shadow Study
Attachment G – Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
Attachment H – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment I – Responses to Public Comments
© 2022
455 HICKEY
455 HICKEY BLVD
DALY CITY, CA
PLANNING SUBMITTAL
10.17.2022
GELLERT BLVD
I-280
N
VICINITY MAP
I-280
HICKEY BLVD
HICKEY
HICKEY BLVD
B
LVD
GELLERT BLVD
SERRAVISTA AVE
SERRAVISTA AVE
VICTORIA ST VICTORIA ST
PROJECT
SITE
CALLAN BLVD
CALLAN BLVD
CALLAN BLVD
ARCHITECT:
DES ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
399 BRADFORD STREET
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
PHONE: 650.364.6453
CONTACT: KENNY HUNG
LANDSCAPE:
DES ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
399 BRADFORD STREET
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
PHONE: 650.364.6453
CONTACT: CHRIS MATEO
PROJECT NARRATIVE
PROJECT TEAM
PROJECT DATA
The project site is located immediately to the south of the Gellert / Hickey Boulevard intersection. The 3.2 acres site is comprised of three parcels.
Currently, there is a 3-level parking garage and a 5-story office building tucked into the hillside on Serravista Avenue. This project proposes to demolish the existing office building and parking garage for a new office development. The development includes a new 8-story tech office building over 3-story parking podium. The total building area is 280,000 sq. ft. at 2.0 FAR. An additional 3-story parking structure will be constructed east to the office building. The project will be looking at a robust TDM plan to encourage alternate commute methods to the site and reduce parking needs. Currently, 900 parking spaces are planned for this scenario, at a 3/1,000 ratio.
CIVIL:
BKF ENGINEERS
255 SHORELINE DR, STE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
PHONE: 650.482.6306
CONTACT: JONATHAN TANG
SITE INFORMATION
APN
ZONING DESIGNATION
(2030 GENERAL PLAN)
COMMERCIAL OFFICE (C-O)
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (C-N)
SITE AREA
091341140
139,392 SQ.FT. (3.2 ACRES)
ZONING INFORMATION
BUILDING HEIGHT
PROJECT USE
65 FT.
EXISTING PROPOSED
130 FT.
OFFICE OFFICE
BUILDING AREA 80,652 SQ.FT. 280,000 SQ.FT.
FAR 0.58 2.0
PARKING STRUCTURE 112,500 SQ.FT. 347,500 SQ. FT.
BUILDING SETBACK
FRONT
REQ'D
C-1 C-O
REAR
PRO'D REQ'D PRO'D
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
PARKING RATIO
PARKING SPACES
3.3 / 1,000 SF
EXISTING PROPOSED
3 / 1000 SF
293 900
FAR 3.5-1.0
- 10' 11'
- 0'
2.0 ZONING DESIGNATION
(CURRENT)
LIGHT COMMERCIAL (C-1)
OFFICE COMMERCIAL (C-O)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD8A)
-
-
STANDARD SPACES
COMPACT SPACES
ACCESSIBLE SPACES
> 706 *
< 176 *
REQ'D PRO'D
730
152
18 18
SPACES BREAKDOWN
EV SPACES
EVCS
EV READY
EV CAPABLE
90 **
90 **
270 **
90 90
270
* PER DALY CITY ZONING CODE SECTION 17.34.010, UP TO 20% OF THE TOTAL REQUIRED OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR "SMALL CARS ONLY" ** PER DALY CITY ZONING CODE SECTION 5.106.5.3.1, 10% OF THE AVAILABLE PARKING SPACES ON SITE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 EVCS; AN ADDITIONAL 10% SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST LEVEL 1 EV READY SPACES; AND AN ADDITIONAL 30% SHALL BE AT LEAST EV CAPABLE.
BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
SHORT TERM
LONG TERM
8 REQ'D PRO'D
8 45 46
MAX HEIGHT 36' - 130'
12'
0'
2.0 130'
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PROJECT DATA A0.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
A0.1 PROJECT DATA
A0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
A1.0A COLOR SITE PLAN
A1.0B SITE PLAN
A1.1 SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM
A1.2 RENDERING - AERIAL VIEW
A1.3 RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING NORTHWEST
A1.4 RENDERING - VIEW FROM HICKEY AND GELLERT
A1.5 RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND GELLERT
A1.6 RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND VICTORIA
A1.7 RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING SOUTHWEST
A1.8 RENDERING - VIEW AT MAIN ENTRANCE
A2.1 PARKING PLANS
A2.2 PARKING PLANS
A2.3 PARKING PLANS
A2.4 BUILDING PLANS
A2.5 BUILDING PLANS
A2.6 SERVICE YARD PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
A3.0 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A4.0 BUILDING MATERIAL BOARD
SHEET INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL
CIVIL
LANDSCAPE
C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN
C2.0 MAPPING PLAN
C3.0 PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURNING PLAN
C3.1 PRELIMINARY DELIVERY TRUCK TURNING PLAN
C5.0 CROSS SECTIONS
C5.1 CROSS SECTIONS
C6.0 UTILITY PLAN - SERRAVISTA AVENUE
C6.1 UTILITY PLAN - HICKEY BOULEVARD
C7.0 PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
C8.0 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C8.1 CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
L1A TREE PROTECTION PLAN
L1B TREE DATA AND TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
L2 ENTRY PLAZA PLAN
L3 OVERALL PLANTING PLAN
L4 HARDSCAPE IMAGERY
L5 PLANTING IMAGERY
C4.0 GRADING PLAN - SERRAVISTA AVENUE
C4.1 GRADING PLAN - HICKEY BOUELVARD
LIGHTING
LT-1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL 1
LT-2 SITE LIGHTING PLAN - LEVEL 4
LT-3 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - LEVEL 4
BUMP BUMP
BUMP BUMP
N
SERRAVISTA AVE
HICKEY BLVD
(E) BUILDING
3 4
1 6
2 5
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt EXISTING CONDITIONS A0.2
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
1 EXISTING SITE PLAN
4 5 6
2 3
3 COLOR SITE PLAN 455 HICKEY
04.27.2023
2.5-LEVEL GARAGE
ABOVE GRADE
SERVICE AND
PARKING ENTRY
ENTRY TO
LOWER-LEVEL
GARAGE LOBBY ENTRY PLAZA
AND DROP-OFF
SERRAVISTA AVE
VICTORIA ST
MARBLY AVE
BERTA CIR
8-STORY
TECH OFFICE
BUILDING
HICKEY BLVD
I-280
FOR AUTHORIZED
VEHICLES ONLY
OPEN SPACE
TO REMAIN
4 HICKEY BLVD GARAGE ENTRY AND MAIN LOBBY 455 HICKEY
04.27.2023
HICKEY BLVD
DROP OFF
LOBBY BIKE STORAGE
P OFF
RBLY AVE
Daly City, CA | 02.13.2023
PATIENT DROP OFF CIRCULATION 455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
DROP OFF LOADING
DROP OFF PARKING
D
178' - 6"
11' - 0"
N
20'
- 6"
25'
- 6"
26' -
0"
RAMP
DN
CLASS I AUTOMATIC-WET
STANDPIPE OUTLET CONNECTION
CLASS I AUTOMATIC-WET
STANDPIPE OUTLET
CONNECTION
FIRE DEPT. ACCESS DRIVEWAY 145' - 6" AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS 276' - 0" 26' - 0"
16' - 0"
LOBBY
150'
- 0"
150' - 0" FI
RE
D
E
PT. ACC
E
SS
PAT
H
O
F
TRAVE
L
FIRE DEPT
. ACCESS
PATH OF TRAVEL
26'
-
0"
MIN
.
41' -
6"
RAMP
UP
SERRAVISTA AVE
HICKEY BLVD
MARBLY
AVE
BERTA CIR
2 2
2 3
3 3
6 7
1 5
7 7
8 8
8 8
8 10
10 11
15 13
12 17
14 16
10' SETBACK
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt SITE PLAN A1.0B
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
KEY NOTES
LANDSCAPE DESIGN FEATURES
Entry Plaza
Bike Parking
Seating Area
Stormwater Treatment Area
SITE CIRCULATION ELEMENTS
Drop Off Zone
Designated Pedestrian Path
Egress Path
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FEATURES
Main Entrance
Garage Elevator/stair Tower
Trash Enclosure
Generator
Future Generator
Chemical Storage
Transformer
Off-street Loading
1235678
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"
WV
WV
WV
HICKEY
BLVD
SERRAVISTA
AVE
MARBLY AVE
BERTA CIR
HICKEY
BLVD
SERRAVISTA
AVE
MARBLY AVE
BERTA CIR
N
HICKEY
BLVD
HICKEY
BLVD
SERRAVISTA
AVE
MARBLY AVE
BERTA CIR
LEGEND
VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE
SERVICE TRUCK ROUTE
ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
UTILITY EASEMENT ROUTE
BUILDING ENTRANCE/EXIT
GARAGE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE/EXIT
GARAGE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE/EXIT
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt SITE CIRCULATION DIAGRAM A1.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
SITE PLAN - SERRAVISTA LEVEL
SITE PLAN - HICKEY LEVEL
AXON - VIEW FROM HICKEY
AXON - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - AERIAL VIEW A1.2
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
455 HICKEY
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING NORTHWEST A1.3
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM HICKEY AND GELLERT A1.4
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND GELLERT A1.5
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND VICTORIA A1.6
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING SOUTHWEST A1.7
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW AT MAIN ENTRANCE A1.8
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
UTILITY
EASEMENT
GARAGE
ACCESS
RAMP DN
RAMP
UP
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
28' - 6"
25' - 6" 29' - 6"
21' MIN.
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP
UP
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
25' - 6"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 1
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 2
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
BIKE
(46)
RAMP
UP
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
25' - 6" 26' - 6"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
LOBBY
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP UP
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.2
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 3
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 4
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP UP
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
20' - 0"
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
20' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0" 2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
20' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.3
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 5
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" LOBBY
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING PLANS A2.4
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
LEVEL 1
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
LEVEL 2
1/32" = 1'-0" 3
LEVEL 3
1/32" = 1'-0" 4
LEVEL 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6"
BALCONY
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
BALCONY BALCONY
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6"
BALCONY
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
BALCONY
BALCONY
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
42' - 0 1/2" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
MECH
SHAFT
MECH
SHAFT
ELEVATOR
OVERRUN
ELEVATOR
OVERRUN
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING PLANS A2.5
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
LEVEL 5
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
LEVEL 6
1/32" = 1'-0" 3
LEVEL 7
1/32" = 1'-0" 4
LEVEL 8
1/32" = 1'-0"
5 ROOF PLAN
CHEM STOR
GENERATOR
TRASH
ENCLOSURE
FUTURE GENERATOR
LOADING AREA
TRANSFORMER
(2) 6-CYD SOLID
WASTE BINS
(1) 6-CYD
RECYCLE BIN
(1) 3-CYD
COMPOST BIN
GARAGE
ELEVATOR/STAIR
ARRIVAL
14' - 6"
30' - 0"
2 A2.6
A2.6
3 A2.6
4 12' - 6"
9' - 6"
10' - 6"
PLASTER OVER
CMU WALL
CHEM
STORAGE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
METAL ROOF
LOUVERED DOOR
CAST-IN-PLACE
CONCRETE COLUMN
12' - 6"
9' - 6"
PLASTER OVER
CMU WALL
TRASH ENCLOSURE
METAL ROOF
LOUVERED DOOR
10' - 6"
9' - 6"
12' - 6"
PLASTER OVER
CMU WALL
CHEM STORAGE
TRASH ENCLOSURE
METAL ROOF METAL PANELS CAST-IN-PLACE
CONCRETE COLUMN
METAL TRIM
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt SERVICE YARD PLAN AND ELEVATIONS A2.6
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/8" = 1'-0" 1
ENLARGED PLAN - SERVICE YARD
1/4" = 1'-0"
2 ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE EAST FACADE
1/4" = 1'-0"
3 ELEVATION - TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH FACADE
1/4" = 1'-0"
4 ELEVATION - CHEM STORAGE NORTH FACADE
S
E
R
RAV
I
STA
AV
E
HICKEY BLVD
1 2
3 4
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PARKING LEVEL 5 + 385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6 + 396.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
PARKING LEVEL 4 + 374.7
SERRAVISTA AVE
ROOF + 504.7
LEVEL 8 + 488.7
LEVEL 7 + 472.7
LEVEL 6 + 456.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
LEVEL 5 + 440.7
LEVEL 4 + 424.7
LEVEL 3 + 408.7
LEVEL 2 + 392.7
LEVEL 1 + 374.7
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
HICKEY BLVD
SERRAVISTA AVE
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
20'
HICKEY BLVD
UTILITY
EASEMENT
ROOF + 504.7
LEVEL 8 + 488.7
LEVEL 7 + 472.7
LEVEL 6 + 456.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
LEVEL 5 + 440.7
LEVEL 4 + 424.7
LEVEL 3 + 408.7
LEVEL 2 + 392.7
LEVEL 1 + 374.7
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PARKING LEVEL 5 + 385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6 + 396.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
PARKING LEVEL 4 + 374.7
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
SERRAVISTA AVE
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING SECTIONS A3.0
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3
SECTION 4
LEVEL 1 :
LEVEL 2 :
LEVEL 3 :
LEVEL 4 :
LEVEL 5 :
LEVEL 6 :
LEVEL 7 :
LEVEL 8 :
35,000 SF
36,000 SF
36,000 SF
36,000 SF
36,100 SF
35,200 SF
34,700 SF
31,000 SF
TOTAL GFA : 280,000 SF
PARKING LEVEL 1
341.7
PARKING LEVEL 2
352.7
PARKING LEVEL 3
363.7
LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 2
392.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
LEVEL 6
456.7
LEVEL 7
472.7
LEVEL 8
488.7
ROOF
504.7
T.O. ROOF
519.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 18' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" PARKING LEVEL 5
385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6
396.7
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
METAL PANEL INFILL
GFRC PANELS
ENTRY CANOPY
METAL FRAME
SUNSHADE
CABLE RAILING
PERFORATED
METAL PANEL
GFRC PANELS
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
METAL PANEL INFILL
GLASS GUARDRAIL
ENTRY CANOPY
SUNSHADE
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
GFRC PANELS
VERTICAL FIN
PARKING LEVEL 1
341.7
PARKING LEVEL 2
352.7
PARKING LEVEL 3
363.7
LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 2
392.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
LEVEL 6
456.7
LEVEL 7
472.7
LEVEL 8
488.7
ROOF
504.7
T.O. ROOF
519.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 18' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" GARAGE
ELEVATOR/STAIR
TOWER
SERVICE YARD
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
METAL PANEL INFILL
GFRC PANELS
ENTRY CANOPY
GLASS GUARDRAIL
PERFORATED
METAL PANEL
LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
LEVEL 6
456.7
LEVEL 7
472.7
LEVEL 8
488.7
ROOF
504.7
T.O. ROOF
519.7
PARKING LEVEL 5
385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6
396.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 12' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" GARAGE
ELEVATOR/STAIR
TOWER
SERVICE YARD
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
SPANDREL GLASS
GFRC PANEL
ENTRY CANOPY
METAL PANEL INFILL
GFRC PANEL
METAL FRAME
SUNSHADE
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
1/32" = 1'-0"
1 EAST ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
2 WEST ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
3 NORTH ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
4 SOUTH ELEVATION
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING MATERIAL BOARD A4.0
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
GLASS
1 SILVER BLUE IGU
GLASS
2 GRAY BLUE IGU
GFRC
4 WARM GRAY PANEL
METAL
5 OFF WHITE
METAL
6 CHARCOAL METAL
PANEL
METAL
7 LIGHT GREY METAL PANEL
6 1 7 5 4 5 2
METAL
8 PERFORATED METAL PANEL
8 GFRC
3 OFF WHITE PANEL
3
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
MAPPING PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
PRELIMINARY EMERGENCY VEHICLE TURNING PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
PRELIMINARY DELIVERY TRUCK TURNING PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
GRADING PLAN - SERRAVISTA AVENUE PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
GRADING PLAN - HICKEY BOUELVARD PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
CROSS SECTIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
CROSS SECTIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
UTILITY PLAN - SERRAVISTA AVENUE PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
UTILITY PLAN - HICKEY BOULEVARD PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
PRELIMINARY STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
EROSION CONTROL PLAN PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
3.5-DR (2)3.0-DR 3.0-DR
3.5-DR
3.0-DR
(2)3.5-DR
3.0-DR 3.5-DR
(2)3.0-DR
3.0-DR
(2)3.0-DR
3.0-DR 3.0 DR 3.0 DR 3.5-DR
3.5-DR
5' PARKING EASE. (DN:92093922)
10' SEWER EASE. (6258 O.R. 63)
2' STREET EASE. (DN:82003259) 10' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PER [1] SERRAVISTA AVENUE (60' WIDE) SERRAVISTA AVENUE (60' WIDE)
VICTORIA
STREET
MARBLY AVENUE
10' SEWER EASE. (DN:26779AS)
D (WIDTH VARIES)
10' SEWER EASE. (6258 O.R. 63) 10' SEWER EASE. (6258 O.R. 63) © 2022 455 Hickey Blvd PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022 LEGEND TREE PROTECTION SUMMARY TREE EVALUATION NOTES: Tree Protection Plan L1A TREE PROTECTION NOTES:
© 2022 455 Hickey Blvd Tree Data / Tree Protection Detail PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022 L1B EXISTING TREE PROTECTION FENCE 1
© 2022 455 Hickey Blvd PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022 KEY NOTES: MATERIAL KEY: ENTRY PLAZA PLAN L2 BUILDING
SERRAVISTA AVENUE SERRAVISTA AVENUE MARBLY AVENUE HICKEY BOULEVARD GELLERT BLVD
VICTORIA STREET
GENERATOR
TRASH
CHEM STOR
GENERATOR SERRAVISTA AVENUE SERRAVISTA AVENUE MARBLY AVENUE GELLERT BLVD VICTORIA STREET © 2022 455 Hickey Blvd PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022 PROPOSED TREE LIST TREES HEDGES LARGE SHRUBS SHRUBS/PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PLANTS AT BIORETENTION Overall Planting Plan L3 VINES ON GREENSCREEN
© 2022
455 Hickey Blvd Hardscape Imagery PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022 L4
© 2022
455 Hickey Blvd
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
TREES
HEDGES
ORNAMENTAL GRASSES BIORETENTION PLANTS VINES
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS
ACER RUBRUM ‘OCTOBER GLORY’
RED MAPLE
PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS VAR. MAKI
SHRUBBY PODOCARPUS
PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM ‘SILVERSHEEN’
SILVER SHEEN KOHUHU
LOMANDRA HYSTRIX ‘TROPICBELLE’
TROPIC BELLE MAT RUSH
CEANOTHUS GRISEUS ‘YANKEE POINT’
YANKEE POINT CEANOTHUS
LIRIOPE MUSCARI
BLUE LILY TURF
PHORMIUM JESTER
NEW ZEALAND FLAX
CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM
SMALL CAPE RUSH
TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES
STAR JASMINE
CAREX DIVULSA
BERKELEY SEDGE
HARDENBERGIA VIOLACEA ‘HAPPY
WANDERER’
PURPLE VINE LILAC
POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM
WESTERN SWORD FERN
ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM
YARROW
GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS
CAROLINA JESSAMINE
DIETES BICOLOR
FORTNIGHT LILY
PENNISETUM ‘FAIRY TALES’
EVERGREEN FOUNTAIN GRASS
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS
PINK MUHLY GRASS
METROSIDEROS EXCELSA
NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE
GINKGO BILOBA ‘AUTUMN GOLD’
AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO
ARBUTUS MARINA
MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE
CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS
WESTERN REDBUD
QUERCUS ILEX
HOLLY OAK
MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA ‘LITTLE GEM’
SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA
Planting Imagery L5
© 2022
455 HICKEY
455 HICKEY BLVD
DALY CITY, CA
MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING APPENDIX
04.07.2023
GELLERT BLVD
I-280
N
VICINITY MAP
I-280
HICKEY BLVD
HICKEY
HICKEY BLVD
B
LVD
GELLERT BLVD
SERRAVISTA AVE
SERRAVISTA AVE
VICTORIA ST VICTORIA ST
PROJECT
SITE
CALLAN BLVD
CALLAN BLVD
CALLAN BLVD
ARCHITECT:
DES ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
399 BRADFORD STREET
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
PHONE: 650.364.6453
CONTACT: KENNY HUNG
LANDSCAPE:
DES ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
399 BRADFORD STREET
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
PHONE: 650.364.6453
CONTACT: CHRIS MATEO
PROJECT NARRATIVE
PROJECT TEAM
PROJECT DATA
The project site is located immediately to the south of the Gellert / Hickey Boulevard intersection. The 3.2 acres site is comprised of three parcels.
Currently, there is a 3-level parking garage and a 5-story office building tucked into the hillside on Serravista Avenue. This project proposes to demolish the existing office building and parking garage for a new medical office development. The development includes a new 5-story medical office building over 3-story parking podium. The total building area is 180,000 sq. ft. at 1.29 FAR. An additional 3-story parking structure will be constructed east to the medical office building. Currently, 900 parking spaces are planned for this scenario, at a 5/1,000 ratio.
CIVIL:
BKF ENGINEERS
255 SHORELINE DR, STE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
PHONE: 650.482.6306
CONTACT: JONATHAN TANG
LIGHTING:
HLB LIGHTING DESIGN
785 MARKET ST, STE800
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
PHONE: 628.246.2714
CONTACT: ANDREW MOORE
SITE INFORMATION
APN
ZONING DESIGNATION
(2030 GENERAL PLAN)
COMMERCIAL OFFICE (C-O)
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (C-N)
SITE AREA
091341140
139,392 SQ.FT. (3.2 ACRES)
ZONING INFORMATION
BUILDING HEIGHT
PROJECT USE
65 FT.
EXISTING PROPOSED
85 FT.
OFFICE MEDICAL OFFICE
BUILDING AREA 80,652 SQ.FT. 180,000 SQ.FT.
FAR 0.58 1.29
PARKING STRUCTURE 112,500 SQ.FT. 347,500 SQ. FT.
BUILDING SETBACK
FRONT
REQ'D
C-1 C-O
REAR
PRO'D REQ'D PRO'D
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
PARKING RATIO
PARKING SPACES
3.3 / 1,000 SF
EXISTING PROPOSED
5 / 1000 SF
293 900
FAR 3.5-1.0
- 10' 11'
- 0'
1.29 ZONING DESIGNATION
(CURRENT)
LIGHT COMMERCIAL (C-1)
OFFICE COMMERCIAL (C-O)
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD8A)
-
-
STANDARD SPACES
COMPACT SPACES
ACCESSIBLE SPACES
> 706 *
< 176 *
REQ'D PRO'D
797
103
18 18
SPACES BREAKDOWN
EV SPACES
EVCS
EV CAPABLE
134 **
405 **
134
405
* PER DALY CITY ZONING CODE SECTION 17.34.010, UP TO 20% OF THE TOTAL REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES MAY BE DESIGNATED FOR "SMALL CARS ONLY"
** PER 2022 CALGREEN CODE SECTION 5.106.5.3.2, 45% OF THE AVAILABLE PARKING SPACES ON SITE SHALL BE EV CAPABLE, AND 33% OF THE EV CAPABLE PARKING NEEDS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH LEVEL 2 EVCS.
BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
SHORT TERM
LONG TERM
8 REQ'D PRO'D
8 45 46
MAX HEIGHT 36' - 85'
12'
0'
1.29 85'
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PROJECT DATA A0.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
A0.1 PROJECT DATA
A1.0A COLOR SITE PLAN
A1.5 RENDERING - VIEW FROM BERTA CIRCLE
A1.6 RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND VICTORIA
A1.7 RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING SOUTHWEST
A1.8 RENDERING - VIEW AT MAIN ENTRANCE
A2.1 PARKING PLANS
A2.2 PARKING PLANS
A2.3 PARKING PLANS
A2.4 BUILDING PLANS
A3.0 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
SHEET INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL
CIVIL
C6.0 UTILITY PLAN - SERRAVISTA AVENUE
C6.1 UTILITY PLAN - HICKEY BOULEVARD
LOBBY
SERRAVISTA AVE
HICKEY BLVD
I-280
VICTORIA ST
GELLERT BLVD
MARBLY AVE
BERTA
CIR
ENTRY TO
PARKING GARAGE
ENTRY TO GARAGE /
IN-DOOR PATIENT DROP OFF
6-LEVEL
PARKING STRUCTURE
5-STORY
MEDICAL OFFICE
BUILDING
ENTRY
PLAZA /
PATIENT
DROP
OFF
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt COLOR SITE PLAN A1.0A
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM BERTA CIRCLE A1.5
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM SERRAVISTA AND VICTORIA A1.6
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW FROM I-280 LOOKING SOUTHWEST A1.7
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt RENDERING - VIEW AT MAIN ENTRANCE A1.8
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
UTILITY
EASEMENT
GARAGE
ACCESS
RAMP DN
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
25' - 6"
21' MIN.
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
BIKE (46)
BIKE PATH
RAMP
UP
DROP OFF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP
UP
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
25' - 6"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
FIRE
TANK
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 1
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 2
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
BOH
LOBBY
ELEVATOR
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
24' - 0"
25' - 6" 26' - 6"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
RAMP
UP
RAMP DN
FIRE PUMP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
LOBBY
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
RAMP
UP
RAMP DN
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.2
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 3
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 4
PARKING LEGEND
ADA SPACE (9' X 18')
ADA VAN SPACE (9' X 18')
EVCS SPACE (9' X 18')
EV READY SPACE (9' X 18')
EV CAPABLE SPACE (9' X 18')
REGULAR SPACE (8.5' X 18')
COMPACT SPACE (8' X 16')
175 SPACES
205 SPACES
221 SPACES
108 SPACES
100 SPACES
91 SPACES
PARKING LEVEL 1 :
PARKING LEVEL 2 :
PARKING LEVEL 3 :
PARKING LEVEL 4 :
PARKING LEVEL 5 :
PARKING LEVEL 6 :
TOTAL PARKING : 900 SPACES
15 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD ACCESSIBLE:
VAN ACCESSIBLE:
TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 18 SPACES
1 SPACES
3 SPACES
3 SPACES
STANDARD EV ACCESSIBLE:
EV VAN ACCESSIBLE:
EV AMBULATORY
TOTAL EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING : 7 SPACES
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP UP
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
20' - 0"
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
20' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
H
J
L
K
30 31
10 32
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 20' - 0" 28' - 0" 20' - 0"
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94°
2.94° 2.94° 2.94° 2.94°
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0"
RAMP DN
24' - 0"
26' - 0"
24' - 0"
19' - 0" 43' - 0" 44' - 0"
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt PARKING PLANS A2.3
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 5
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" LOBBY
29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
ELEC
IDF
ELEC IDF
MEN
WOMEN
TENANT
SPACE
TENANT
SPACE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
39' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 33' - 0" 11' - 6" 29' - 6" 34' - 0" 27' - 6" 26' - 0" 9' - 0"
26' - 0" 27' - 6" 34' - 0"
MECH MECH
STAIR
ELEV
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING PLANS A2.4
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
1/32" = 1'-0" 1
LEVEL 1
N
1/32" = 1'-0" 2
LEVEL 2
1/32" = 1'-0"
3 LEVEL 3
1/32" = 1'-0" 4
LEVEL 4
1/32" = 1'-0" 5
LEVEL 5
1/32" = 1'-0"
6 ROOF
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PARKING LEVEL 5 + 385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6 + 396.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
PARKING LEVEL 4 + 374.7
SERRAVISTA AVE
ROOF + 456.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
LEVEL 5 + 440.7
LEVEL 4 + 424.7
LEVEL 3 + 408.7
LEVEL 2 + 392.7
LEVEL 1 + 374.7
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
HICKEY BLVD
SERRAVISTA AVE
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
HICKEY BLVD
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
LEVEL 5 + 440.7
LEVEL 4 + 424.7
LEVEL 3 + 408.7
LEVEL 2 + 392.7
LEVEL 1 + 374.7
ROOF + 456.7
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE
PARKING LEVEL 5 + 385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6 + 396.7
PARKING LEVEL 3 + 363.7
PARKING LEVEL 2 + 352.7
PARKING LEVEL 1 + 341.7
PARKING LEVEL 4 + 374.7
20'
UTILITY
EASEMENT
SERRAVISTA AVE
S
E
R
RAVI
STA
AVE
HICKEY BLVD
1 2
3 4
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING SECTIONS A3.0
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3
SECTION 4
LEVEL 1 :
LEVEL 2 :
LEVEL 3 :
LEVEL 4 :
LEVEL 5 :
35,600 SF
36,100 SF
36,100 SF
36,100 SF
36,100 SF
TOTAL GFA : 180,000 SF
PARKING LEVEL 1
341.7
PARKING LEVEL 2
352.7
PARKING LEVEL 3
363.7
LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 2
392.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
ROOF
456.7
T.O. ROOF
471.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 18' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" PARKING LEVEL 5
385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6
396.7
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
ENTRY CANOPY
METAL FRAME
SUNSHADE
CABLE RAILING
PERFORATED METAL
PANEL
GFRC PANELS
T.O. (E) BLDG PARAPET
406.0
413.5
T.O. (E) BLDG PENTHOUSE
85' - 0" 33' - 0"
130' - 0"
PARAPET
459.7
FINISHED GRADE AT HICKEY
FINISHED GRADE AT SERRAVISTA 118' - 0"
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
ENTRY CANOPY
SUNSHADE
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
GFRC PANELS
VERTICAL FIN
T.O. (E) BLDG PARAPET
406.0
413.5
T.O. (E) BLDG PENTHOUSE
PARKING LEVEL 1
341.7
PARKING LEVEL 2
352.7
PARKING LEVEL 3
363.7
LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 2
392.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
ROOF
456.7
T.O. ROOF
471.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 18' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" GARAGE
ELEVATOR/STAIR
TOWER
T.O. ROOF AT 408.7
SERVICE YARD
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
GFRC PANELS
ENTRY CANOPY
GLASS GUARDRAIL
PERFORATED METAL
PANEL
118' - 0"
T.O. (E) BLDG PARAPET
406.0
413.5
T.O. (E) BLDG PENTHOUSE
130' - 0"
PARAPET
459.7
EXISTING GRADE AT 342.3 EXISTING GRADE AT 331.7 FINISHED GRADE AT 341.7 LEVEL 1
374.7
LEVEL 3
408.7
LEVEL 4
424.7
LEVEL 5
440.7
ROOF
456.7
T.O. ROOF
471.7
PARKING LEVEL 5
385.7
PARKING LEVEL 6
396.7
15' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 16' - 0" 12' - 0" 11' - 0" 11' - 0" GARAGE
ELEVATOR/STAIR
TOWER,
T.O. ROOF AT 408.7
SERVICE YARD
METAL CLADDED
ROOF OVERHANG
METAL CLADDED
ROOF SCREEN
VISION GLASS
CABLE RAILING
GREEN SCREEN
ENTRY CANOPY
METAL PANEL INFILL
GFRC PANEL
METAL FRAME
SUNSHADE
T.O. (E) BLDG PARAPET
406.0
413.5
T.O. (E) BLDG PENTHOUSE
85' - 0"
PARAPET
459.7
97' - 0"
EXISTING GRADE AT 375
EXISTING GRADE AT 370.7
FINISHED GRADE AT 374.7
© 2022
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023
Autodesk Docs://KingAsst - 455HickeyBlvd/10071003_A_455 Hickey_MOB_R22_CENTRAL.rvt BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.1
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
1/32" = 1'-0"
1 EAST ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
2 WEST ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
3 NORTH ELEVATION
1/32" = 1'-0"
4 SOUTH ELEVATION
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
UTILITY PLAN - HICKEY BOULEVARD
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023 Page 118 of 567
© 2022
255 SHORELINE DRIVE
SUITE 200
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065
(650) 482-6300
www.bkf.com
455 HICKEY, DALY CITY, CA
10071.003
UTILITY PLAN - HICKEY BOULEVARD
PLANNING SUBMITTAL 10.17.2022
PLAN CHECK RESPONSE 1 03.31.2023
MOB APPENDIX 04.07.2023 Page 119 of 567
DRAFT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE PD-8B
455 HICKEY BOULEVARD OFFICE BUILDING AND PARKING STRUCTURE
REDEVELOPMENT
The purpose and intent of these Planned Development Standards is to establish a Planned Development Zoning District for PD-8B, which encompasses the entire project site.
I. GENERAL
1. The Design Review approval shall be effective for five years, unless otherwise extended by the City Council.
2. When these planned development standards conflict with other sections of the Zoning Ordinance, these standards prevail only to the extent of the conflict. Where these planned development standards do not provide regulations, the Zoning Ordinance shall apply as to the most similar land use or standard.
3. Any modifications to plans approved by the City Council shall require an amendment of the original PD approval and shall be subject to separate approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. Minor changes of the approved plans due to code requirements or conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Division.
4. All structures, landscape areas, required facilities and amenities shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition, subject to improvement and upgrading of plans as required by this Planned Development approval.
5. The property owners of PD-8B shall seek to provide a balanced mix of Commercial Office and/or Medical Office uses with compatible peak hours and parking needs.
II. PERMITTED USES
A. The following uses are permitted as part of Planned Development Zone PD-8B:
Commercial Office
Medical Office
Ancillary uses related to Commercial and Medical Office
1. When a use is not specifically listed, it shall be assumed that when the unlisted use is similar to nor more objectionable than a permitted use, such use shall be permitted in the district to the same requirements of the most similarly listed use.
II. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
PD-8B Planned Development Standards
A. Parking
1. Property owners shall implement measures to manage the parking during the peak hours. The plan may include such measures as valet parking, incentives to carpooling and disincentives to parking in the residential areas near the development.
2. The total number of on-site parking spaces required for the 455 Hickey Boulevard Commercial Office or Medical Office shall be a total of 900 parking spaces. This requirement shall be based on three parking space per 1,000 square feet within the property.
3. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided at strategic locations throughout the property including the ground floor of any parking structure. A total of eight short-term bicycle parking spaces and 46 long term parking spaces shall be provided.
4. The parking areas shall conform to plans approved as part of the preliminary plan for PD-8B and shall be maintained in accordance with City standards.
B. Signage
1. New Signage for the project should enhance the building facades. All signage shall adhere to the requirements of Chapter 17.32.200 Permitted signs in commercial and industrial districts of the Daly City Municipal Code.
2. All signage shall require a Building Permit submittal and review for approval by City staff.
C. Circulation
1. All deliveries shall gain access to the project site by way of the Serravista Avenue driveway to access the singular loading area east of the building within the service yard.
a. Deliveries to the development by large semi-type trucks shall not take place during peak traffic hours. Smaller delivery vehicles may deliver at all hours.
b. The property owners shall provide an approved Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan and implement any required
PD-8B Planned Development Standards
measures to meet City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County’s TDM Policy.
c. Site access and parking for the project (under either option) would include two entry points for employees and visitors to access the podium parking and the parking structure. Access to the podium parking would be provided primarily from Hickey Boulevard with drop-off at the interior lobby. Access to the parking structure east of the office building would be provided primarily via a private driveway off Serravista Avenue. A curbside drop-off space would be provided on Serravista Avenue, connecting the sidewalk and the new entry plaza leading to the building’s main lobby.
D. Landscaping
1. All landscaping improvements shall conform to the approved landscaping plan and with Section 17.41 (Landscaping) of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and maintained in a neat, clean and healthful condition. b. In general, all shrubs or any vegetation at points of ingress or egress shall be maintained at a height of no greater than 30 inches.
Trees must be trimmed in a manner to maintain a site clearance underneath the branches of five feet from grade.
c. Landscaping shall be planted at the base of any monument signs and shall be maintained in a healthy growing condition and be replaced as necessary. The plants shall include a variety of flowering evergreen shrubs and flowering ground cover.
E. Architecture/Site Design
1. Architectural design of all structures and facades, all materials and colors, and all landscaping shall comply with plans approved by a Design Review Permit.
a. Once approved, any major architectural modification shall be subject to approval by a Design Review Permit, except that minor changes may be approved administratively by the Planning Division.
b. All roof equipment shall be screened from view from the surrounding streets.
PD-8B Planned Development Standards
c. The Planning Division shall approve the design and location of all trash or storage enclosures and other proposed fencing or walls. d. All ground mounted appurtenances, such as transformers or air conditioning units shall be undergrounded.
F. Maintenance
1. A maintenance plan for on-site litter control shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the City. The litter control maintenance plan shall include provision for on-going maintenance required for the project use. The maintenance plan shall be recorded as part of the PD-8B planned development standards. The maintenance plan shall include the following standards:
b. The entire development area shall be maintained in a neat, safe, and healthful condition.
c. A garbage disposal plan approved by the Planning Division and the Streets Division shall specify that:
i. All trash shall be confined in approved receptacles and enclosures.
ii. All unenclosed materials, equipment and/or supplies of any kind shall be maintained within approved enclosure areas.
Any stacked or stored items shall not exceed the height of the enclosure.
iii. All trash and storage enclosures shall be properly maintained in accordance with approved plans.
iv. The applicant shall prepare an agreement to implement a weekly litter cleanup plan for all open areas, planters and public sidewalks adjacent to the development. All waste materials generated by the development, such as cardboard boxes, skids, garbage, litter, etc., must be stored in the enclosure for disposal. No waste material shall be visible at anytime. All enclosures shall be designed to conceal the contents. All enclosures should be kept clean and free of odor at all times.
G. Lighting
PD-8B Planned Development Standards
1. All exterior lighting shall be in accordance with precise plans and shall be adequately maintained according to approved standards.
2. Site lighting shall be directed downward to protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from glare.
H. Building Area Limitation
1. There shall be no additional square footage allowed in PD-8B beyond what is permitted through approval of the precise plan. Minor additions or alterations to square footage for any given designated use (+/- 2%) may be approved by the Planning Division if such changes are to meet specific code requirements and do not affect the overall mass of the building.
2. The Commercial Office alternative shall include a 280,000 square feet commercial office building over a three-story, 347,500 square feet, parking podium with additional parking structure constructed east of the building. The general distribution of allowable square footage shall be in substantial accordance with the Precise Plan.
3. The Medical Office alternative shall include 180,000 square feet medical office use building over a three-story parking, 347,500 square feet, podium with additional parking structure constructed east of the building.
The general distribution of allowable square footage shall be in substantial accordance with the Precise Plan.
I. Maximum Permitted Building Height
1. Building height for the Commercial Office building shall be an eight-story, 166-foot tall, office building over three-story parking podium and three-story Parking structure located east of building.
2. Building height for the Medical Office building shall be a five-story, 118- foot tall, building over three-story parking podium and three-story parking structure located east of building.
J. Building Setbacks
1. Front setback: 11 ft.
Side setbacks: 0 ft.
Rear setback: 0 ft.
K. Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
PD-8B Planned Development Standards
1. 2.0 FAR
Traffic Impact Study Report
455 Hickey Boulevard
April 26, 2023
Daly City, California
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
Page | i
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 8
1.1 Study Intersections and Scenarios ................................................................................................................................ 8
2.0 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 13
2.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled .....................................................................................................................................................13
2.2 Level of Service Analysis Methodology .....................................................................................................................13 Signalized Intersections ....................................................................................................................................................14 Unsignalized Intersections ...............................................................................................................................................14
2.3 Level of Service Standards .............................................................................................................................................15 City of Daly City Intersections .........................................................................................................................................15 Caltrans Intersections .........................................................................................................................................................16 Town of Colma Intersections...........................................................................................................................................16 City of South San Francisco Intersections ...................................................................................................................16
3.0 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 17
3.1 Existing Setting and Roadway System .......................................................................................................................17
3.2 Existing Pedestrian Facilities ..........................................................................................................................................18
3.3 Existing Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................................................................................18
3.4 Existing Transit Facilities .................................................................................................................................................18
3.5 Estimated Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................23
3.6 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ..............................................................................23
4.0 Existing plus Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 27
4.1 Project Trip Generation ...................................................................................................................................................27
4.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................................................28
4.4 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions ...........................32
4.5 Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions ...........................33
5.0 Cumulative (2035) No Project Conditions .......................................................................................... 38
5.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis - Cumulative Conditions........................................................................38
6.0 Cumulative (2035) plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................ 41
6.1 Intersection Level of Service Analysis - Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions .....................41
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
Page | ii
6.2 Intersection Level of Service Analysis - Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions .....................42
7.0 Vehicles miles traveled & Transportation Demand Management ................................................... 48
7.1 Vehicle Miles Traveled .....................................................................................................................................................48
7.2 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Policy ............................................................................................48
8.0 Additional Transportation Analysis ..................................................................................................... 50
8.1 Site Access and On-Site Circulation ............................................................................................................................50 Site Access .............................................................................................................................................................................50
8.2 Local Operational Analysis .............................................................................................................................................51
8.3 Parking Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................. 54
8.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Impacts ....................................................................................................................55 Pedestrian Impacts .............................................................................................................................................................55 Bicycle Impacts .....................................................................................................................................................................56 Transit Impacts .....................................................................................................................................................................56
8.5 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................56 Tables
Table 1: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections ................................................................................14 Table 2: Level of Service Definitions for Stop Controlled Intersections .....................................................................15 Table 3: Existing Bus Routes ......................................................................................................................................................19 Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ..........................................................................24 Table 5a: Project Net Trip Generation – Project Alternative 1 .......................................................................................27 Table 5b: Project Net Trip Generation – Project Alternative 2 .......................................................................................27 Table 7a: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions ....................34 Table 7b: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions ....................35 Table 8: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative Conditions ..................................................................39 Table 9a: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions .............44 Table 9b: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions .............45 Table 10: Comparison of Parking Requirements ................................................................................................................54
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
Page | iii
Figures
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................................................................................10 Figure 2: Project Site Plan ...........................................................................................................................................................11 Figure 3: Existing Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Facilities .............................................................................................20 Figure 4: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls ....................................................................................................25 Figure 5: Existing Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...............................................................................................26 Figure 6a: Project Trip Distribution .........................................................................................................................................29 Figure 6b: Project Trip Assignment, Alternative 1 ..............................................................................................................30 Figure 6c: Project Trip Assignment, Alternative 2 ..............................................................................................................31 Figure 7a: Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..........................................36 Figure 7b: Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ..........................................37 Figure 8: Cumulative Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................40 Figure 9a: Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................46 Figure 9b: Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................47 Figure 10: Recommended Intersection Improvements at Gellert Blvd and Serravista Avenue .........................53 Appendices
Appendix A – Traffic Counts Worksheets
Appendix B – Existing Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix C – Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix D – Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix E – Cumulative Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix F – Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix G – Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions Intersections Level of Service Worksheets Appendix H - C/CAG VMT Estimation Tool
Appendix I - C/CAG TDM Checklist
Appendix J - Signal Warrant Analysis Worksheet
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis conducted for the proposed office development at 455 Hickey Boulevard in Daly City, as shown in Figure 1. The proposed project would replace the existing 81,460 square foot office building and parking facilities with one of two development alternatives.
Project Alternative 1 would construct a new 180,000 square feet (sq. ft.) medical office building with a parking structure. Project Alternative 2 would construct a new 280,000 sq. ft. tech office building with a parking structure.
The project site is accessed via one driveway on Hickey Boulevard and one on Serravista Avenue.
Project Trip Generation
Project trip generation for the proposed project was estimated based on published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation 10th Edition. The project site is currently occupied by an existing 81,460 square foot office building that would be replaced.
The proposed Alternative 1 is expected to generate 5,471 net new daily trips, including 406 net new a.m. peak hour trips (309 in, 97 out) and 529 net new p.m. peak hour trips (159 in, 370 out). The proposed Alternative 2 is expected to generate 1,934 net new daily trips, including 231 net new a.m. peak hour trips (199 in, 32 out) and 228 net new p.m. peak hour trips (36 in, 192 out).
Existing Conditions
Under this scenario, 15 of the 17 study intersections operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours. The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour. The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard operates at LOS F during both peak hours.
Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions
Under this scenario, 15 of the 17 study intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours in accordance with City standards.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 (Intersection #12) degrades from LOS E with 71.2 seconds to LOS F with 78.0 seconds during the a.m. peak hour. One option to reduce total delay is to convert the eastbound right turn lane to a shared through-right lane, thus providing a second through lane. With this physical improvement, delay is reduced to 61.5 seconds.
The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (Intersection #17) continues to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. The project adds 0.5 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and 5.3 seconds of delay in the p.m. peak hour. A feasible mitigation measure to reduce overall delay is to optimize signal timing. With this improvement, the delay in the a.m. peak hour is 37.5 seconds, which is 64.7 seconds less than existing conditions, and 47.5 seconds in the p.m. peak hour, which is 102.0 seconds less than existing conditions.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 2
These two intersections are operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at these intersections. Since these intersections currently operate below an acceptable level of service, and this project adds a marginal number of trips, this project should contribute a fair share toward these improvements, if they are deemed necessary.
Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions
Under this scenario, 15 of the 17 study intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours, thus meeting the City’s LOS policy.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 (Intersection #12) continues to operate at LOS E with an increase of 3.8 seconds of delay. Based on the physical intersection improvements described in the previous section for Project Alternative 1, delay can be improved to 13.6 seconds less than existing conditions.
The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (Intersection #17) continues to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. The project adds 0.1 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and 3.2 seconds of delay in the p.m. peak hour. A feasible mitigation measure to reduce overall delay is to optimize signal timing. With this improvement, the delay in the a.m. peak hour is 37.4 seconds, which is 64.7 seconds less than existing conditions, and 47.9 seconds in the p.m. peak hour, which is 101.6 seconds less than existing conditions.
These two intersections are operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at these intersections. Since these intersections currently operate below an acceptable level of service and this project adds a marginal number of trips, this project should contribute a fair share toward these improvements, if they are deemed necessary.
Cumulative (2035) No Project Conditions
Under this scenario, 14 of the 17 study intersections operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours. The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour. The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps operates at LOS F during both peak hours. The intersection of Hickey Boulevard & I280 northbound ramps operates at LOS E with 56.2 seconds of delay during the p.m. peak hour.
Cumulative (2035) plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions Under this scenario, 14 of the 17 study intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours. The three intersections that operate below LOS D in the Cumulative Condition continue to operate at the same LOS in the Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard & I-280 northbound on-ramps (Intersection #6) continues to operate at LOS E with an additional 4.2 seconds of delay. This impact can be mitigated by converting the southbound approach from one left/through lane and one right turn lane, to one left turn lane and one
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 3
through/right turn lane. This mitigation will reduce delay in the p.m. peak hour to 50.3 seconds, improving the level of service back to acceptable LOS D.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR 35 (Intersection #12) continues to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with an additional 10.2 seconds of delay, for a total of 103.9 seconds of delay. The physical intersection improvements described in the previous section for Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions would reduce this delay to 81.0 seconds, which is an improvement over Cumulative No Project conditions.
The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (Intersection #17) operates at LOS F during both peak hours. The project adds 0.3 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and 3.9 seconds of additional delay in the p.m. peak hour. The mitigation measure described in the previous section for Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions would reduce the delay in the a.m. peak hour to 92.6 seconds less than cumulative conditions. In the p.m. peak hour the delay is reduced to 147.3 seconds less than cumulative conditions.
The improvements identified for these three intersections mitigate the project’s impacts. These three intersections are operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at these intersections. Since these intersections currently operate below an acceptable level of service and this project adds a marginal number of trips, this project should contribute a fair share toward these improvements, if it is deemed necessary.
Cumulative (2035) plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions Under this scenario, 14 of the 17 study intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours. The three intersections that operate below LOS D in the Cumulative Condition, continue to operate at the same LOS in the Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard & I-280 northbound on-ramps (Intersection #6) continues to operate at LOS E with an additional 1.3 seconds of delay. This impact can be mitigated by converting the southbound approach from one left/through lane and one right turn lane, to one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. This mitigation will reduce delay in the p.m. peak hour to 46.2 seconds, improving the level of service back to acceptable LOS D.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR 35 (Intersection #12) continues to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with an additional 6.0 seconds of delay, for a total of 99.7 seconds of delay. The physical intersection improvements described in the previous section for Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions would reduce this delay to 77.2 seconds, which is an improvement over Cumulative No Project conditions.
The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (Intersection #17) operates at LOS F during both peak hours. The project adds 0.0 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and 1.9 seconds of additional delay in the p.m. peak hour. The mitigation measure described in the previous section for Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions would reduce the delay
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 4
in the a.m. peak hour to 92.9 seconds less than cumulative conditions. In the p.m. peak hour the delay is reduced to 148.4 seconds less than cumulative conditions.
The improvements identified for these three intersections mitigate the project’s impacts. These three intersections are operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at these intersections. Since these intersections currently operate below an acceptable level of service and this project adds a marginal number of trips, this project should contribute a fair share toward these improvements, if it is deemed necessary.
Vehicle Miles Traveled
The project is located in Travel Analysis Zone (TAZ) #1918 in the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) model, which is tagged as a Transit Priority Area (TPA) under C/CAG geographical definitions. A TPA is defined as being within one half mile of a transit stop in a high quality corridor with a frequency of service interval of 15minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Since the project is located within a TPA, the project is screened out from VMT analysis.
This meets Caltrans and C/CAG policy for determination of a less than significant impact.
Transportation Demand Management Policy
Since this proposed project is located in a TPA, as identified in the VMT analysis above, and defined as a large non-residential project, the target trip reduction is 25% based on the C/CAG TDM Policy. The TDM Policy identifies nine measures which are required of all projects. These required measures add up to the goal of 25% reduction. The nine measures are as follows:
1. Free/Preferential Parking for Carpools
2. TDM Coordinator/Contact Person
3. Actively Participate in Commute.org or a Transportation Management Association Equivalent
4. Carpool or Vanpool Program
5. Transit or Rideshare Passes/Subsidies
6. Pre-Tax Transportation Benefits
7. Secure Bicycle Storage
8. Design Streets to Encourage Bike/Pedestrian Access
9. Showers, Lockers and Changing Rooms for Cyclists
Site Access
Vehicles would access the project site via a driveway on Hickey Boulevard and a driveway on Serravista Avenue. A third access point is restricted to City utility access at the southern edge of the project. Truck access to a loading area is provided via the driveway at Serravista Avenue with appropriate turning radii.
Two vehicle pick-up/drop-off zones are proposed with one at the entry plaza to the building on Serravista Avenue and one at the first level of the parking garage accessible via Hickey Boulevard entrance. Based on Project Alternative 1, it is recommended that at a minimum the drop off space accommodate eight vehicles. Based on Project Alternative 2, it is recommended that at a minimum the drop off space
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 5
accommodate five vehicles. The project is currently proposing space for five vehicles at the entry plaza on Serravista, and space for five vehicles within the parking garage which is sufficient for both alternatives.
Pedestrian access to the project site is located at the Entry Plaza on Serravista Avenue. Pedestrian access is provided through connections via adequate sidewalks on Serravista Avenue, which connect to sidewalks on Gellert Boulevard and Hickey Boulevard.
Bicyclists can access the site either as a vehicle at the designated driveways or as a pedestrian at the Entry Plaza. The bicycle locker facility is located on the first parking garage level accessible by Hickey Boulevard adjacent to the elevators. Gellert Boulevard south of Serravista Avenue has marked Class II bike lanes and Hickey Boulevard is a marked Class III bicycle route. Serravista Avenue is a low-volume residential roadway that functions easily as a bikeway without specific designation.
Site access for vehicles, trucks, pedestrians and bicycles are adequate.
Local Operational Analysis
The operational analysis reveals that in the a.m. peak hour, the queue from northbound vehicles on Gellert Boulevard approaching Hickey Boulevard is 510 feet long and blocks the downstream one-way stopcontrolled intersection of Serravista Avenue, which is only 300 feet away.
To reduce this queue, it is recommended that one of the northbound through lanes is converted to a shared through-right lane, to allow for a dual right turn lanes to accommodate heavy right turn volumes.
This improvement reduces the queue to 129 feet.
Reducing the queue at Hickey Boulevard and Gellert Boulevard will improve operations at the intersection of Gellert Boulevard and Serravista Avenue. Vehicles entering and exiting Serravista Avenue will no longer be blocked by the queue resulting in easier access through the intersection.
It is noted that the southbound left turn has a stop bar and STOP legend pavement markings. This can be confusing by leading southbound drivers to believe that the intersection is an all-way stop. It is recommended that this STOP bar and legend be removed.
Another operational issue at this intersection is pedestrian access and safety as this is a major crossing to connect Gellert Park with the residential and commercial area. This pedestrian access is also needed to access the bus stop on the west side of Gellert Avenue. To enhance pedestrian access and safety at this location, it is recommended to install flashing pedestrian crossing signs and curb bulbouts at the corners.
Parking
The project will provide a total of 900 parking spaces which meet City requirements and exceeds parking generation determined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The proposed supply of vehicle parking types such as accessible, electric vehicles charging stations and future stations and bicycle parking is more than adequate.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 6
Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Impacts
The project will connect to existing pedestrian facilities and will need to provide on-site circulation through a variety of continuous paths and crosswalks. The project is not expected to create any disruptions or inconsistencies with existing pedestrian facilities or plans. Pedestrians and bicyclists can access the closest transit stops on Gellert Boulevard via a continuous path of sidewalks. However, it is recommended that the project implement pedestrian crossing safety improvements at the intersection of Gellert Boulevard and Serravista Avenue to facilitate access to the transit stop on the west side of Gellert Boulevard. The project is expected to add trips to the existing transit services, which can be accommodated by the existing transit capacity. It is recommended that SamTrans is contacted to determine if the bus stop along the project frontage on Hickey Boulevard requires any modifications or enhancements as there currently is no signage. Therefore, the project is estimated to have a less than significant impact to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities.
Recommendations
Based on the findings in this report, TJKM recommends the following:
It is recommended that the northbound through lane at Gellert Boulevard and Hickey Boulevard be converted to a shared through-right turn lane.
It is recommended that a flashing pedestrian crossing sign along with curb bulbouts be installed at the intersection of Gellert Boulevard and Serravista Avenue. It is recommended that Caltrans be consulted to determine if improvements are needed at the following intersections since they are already operating below LOS D:
o Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound o Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35
o Hickey Boulevard & I-280 northbound on-ramps
If improvements are needed, the project should contribute a fair share percentage. It is recommended that this project implement all nine required TDM measures identified on the C/CAG TDM checklist as outlines in section 7.2. and is summarized as follows:
o Free/Preferential Parking for Carpools
o TDM Coordinator/Contact Person
o Actively Participate in Commute.org or a Transportation Management Association Equivalent
o Carpool or Vanpool Program
o Transit or Rideshare Passes/Subsidies
o Pre-Tax Transportation Benefits
o Secure Bicycle Storage
o Design Streets to Encourage Bike/Pedestrian Access
o Showers, Lockers and Changing Rooms for Cyclists
It is recommended that the project’s vehicle drop-off/pick-up zone accommodate at least eight vehicles in the case of Project Alternative 1, and five vehicles in the case of Project Alternative 2.
Signage should be provided which limits parking to a 10 minute loading zone.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 7
It is recommended that SamTrans be consulted to determine if a bus stop continues to exist on Hickey Boulevard along the project frontage and if additional improvements are needed at this location to accommodate this bus stop.
It is recommended that the STOP bar and legend is removed from the southbound left turn lane at Gellert Boulevard at Serravista Avenue.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 8
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the transportation impact analysis conducted for the proposed office development at 455 Hickey Boulevard in Daly City, as shown in Figure 1. The proposed project would replace the existing 81,460 square foot office building and its parking facilities with one of two development alternatives.
Project Alternative 1 would construct a new 180,000 square feet (sq. ft.) medical office building with a parking structure. Project Alternative 2 would construct a new 280,000 sq. ft. tech office building with a parking structure.
Transportation impacts include vehicle miles travelled (VMT) analysis in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as well as local impacts measured in terms of vehicle delay and levels of service at intersections and transportation operations issues such as site access, impacts to active transportation modes and vehicle traffic operations.
1.1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS AND SCENARIOS
TJKM evaluated traffic conditions at seventeen study intersections and two project driveways during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for a typical weekday. The study intersections were selected based on TJKM’s working knowledge of the area with input and approval from Daly City staff.
New peak hour turning movement counts were collected in July 2021. The peak periods observed were between 7:00-9:00 a.m. and 4:00-6:00 p.m. These counts were noted to be low due to irregular traffic volumes resulting from 2020-2021 pandemic conditions. Historical counts at two intersections, at Hickey Boulevard & Skyline Boulevard in November 2017 and at Hickey Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard in November 2019, were used as the basis of adjusting the new turning movement volumes to estimated typical volumes. These adjusted volumes are the basis for analyzing Existing Conditions scenarios. The study intersections, associated traffic controls and responsible jurisdiction are as follows:
1. Serravista Avenue & Gellert Boulevard (one-way stop) – City of Daly City
2. Serravista Avenue & Marbly Avenue (one-way stop) - City of Daly City
3. Serravista Avenue & Victoria Street (two-way stop) – City of Daly City
4. Serravista Avenue & Project Access (one-way stop) – City of Daly City
5. Hickey Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard (signal) – City of South San Francisco
6. Hickey Boulevard & I-280 Northbound Ramps (signal) - Caltrans
7. Hickey Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps (signal) - Caltrans
8. Hickey Boulevard & Project Access (one-way stop) – City of Daly City
9. Hickey Boulevard & Gellert Boulevard (signal) – City of Daly City
10. Hickey Boulevard & Callan Boulevard (signal) – City of Daly City
11. Hickey Boulevard & Campus Drive (signal) – City of Daly City
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 9
12. Hickey Boulevard & Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 (signal) - Caltrans
13. Gellert Boulevard & Victoria Street (all-way stop) – City of Daly City
14. Gellert Boulevard & Serramonte Boulevard (signal) – City of Daly City
15. Serramonte Boulevard & I-280 Northbound Ramps (signal) - Caltrans
16. Serramonte Boulevard & I-280 Southbound Ramps (signal) - Caltrans
17. Serramonte Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (signal) - Caltrans Figure 1 illustrates the study intersections and the vicinity map of the proposed project. The detailed inset map shows the existing and proposed project driveways.
This study addresses the following six traffic scenarios:
Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates the study intersections based on the adjusted existing turning movement counts.
Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions – This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed Project Alternative 1. Existing plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions – This scenario is identical to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed Project Alternative 2. Cumulative (2035) No Project Conditions – This scenario is similar to the Existing Conditions but with future turning movement counts which were derived from the City of Daly City’s Traffic Demand Model Buildout Year 2035 based on land uses identified in the City’ General Plan. Cumulative plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions – This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed Project Alternative 1. Cumulative plus Project Alternative 2 Conditions – This scenario is identical to Cumulative Conditions, but with the addition of traffic from the proposed Project Alternative 2.
Hickey Blvd.
Serravista Ave.
Marbly Ave.
Berta Cir.
Gellert Blvd.
Victoria St.
9 7
1 2 4
3 13
8 280
N
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Hickey Blvd.
Callan Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Skyline Blvd.
Gellert Blvd.
See Detail
5 17
16 15
13 10
11 12
14 1
9 7
6 280
Project Site
X Study Intersection
Project Driveway
LEGEND
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
%.4294/02/0/3%$
0!2+).'0/$)5-
%.4294/'!2!'%
&2/-()#+%9
,/""9
%.429 0,!:! !.$
$2/0
/&&
,%6%,
0!2+).'3425#452%
34/29
4%#(/&&)#%
"5),$).'
$ALY#ITY
#!
3)4%0,!.
4%#( ()#+%9 1
3)4%!2%!
'2/33",$'!2%!
",$'(%)'(4
2%1g$0!2+).'
02/g$0!2+).'3
!#2%3
3&&!2
34/29",$'
,%6%,0!2+).'
30!#%3
3&
30!#%3
$ALY#ITY
#!
3)4%0,!.
4%#( ()#+%9
TJKM
Figure 2a: Site Plan, Alternative 1
134-014 | 04/2023
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
N
%.4294/02/0/3%$
0!2+).'0/$)5-
%.4294/'!2!'%
&2/-()#+%9
,/""9
%.429 0,!:! !.$
$2/0
/&&
,%6%,
0!2+).'3425#452%
34/29
-%$)#!,/&&)#%
"5),$).'
$ALY#ITY
#!
3)4%0,!.
-/" ()#+%9 1
3)4%!2%!
'2/33",$'!2%!
",$'(%)'(4
2%1g$0!2+).'
02/g$0!2+).'3
!#2%3
3&&!2
34/29",$'
,%6%,0!2+).'
30!#%3
3&
30!#%3
TJKM
Figure 2b: Site Plan, Aternative 2
134-014 | 04/2023
N
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 13
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY
Transportation impacts related to the proposed project were evaluated for environmental significance as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Additional analysis include evaluation of conformity with local policies, impact on traffic operations and site access.
As of July 1, 2020, Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) is the new measure of traffic impact significance for CEQA purposes. According to a technical advisory published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), vehicle delay is no longer an appropriate measure of environmental impact. The City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) of San Mateo has adopted policies in accordance with the technical advisory published by the OPR. Although intersection level of service (LOS) is no longer be used to determine significant impacts for CEQA purposes, it can be used to determine conformity with the City of Daly City’s adopted General Plan.
2.1 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
Reducing Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) per capita is an important component for achieving the state’s longterm climate goals since half of greenhouse gas emissions are derived from transportation sources. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) published the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. This document provides the basis for VMT analysis for this project.
Caltrans also has adopted VMT as the primary metric for traffic impact studies based on the updated Transportation Impact Study Guidelines dated May 20, 2020. These new guidelines are also based on the OPR Technical Advisory document.
The City of Daly City has not adopted formal VMT guidelines. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) guidelines are used, since Daly City is a member agency.
C/CAG provided a SB 743 Implementation Decisions document, published on September 2021 which consists of VMT thresholds and screening criteria for projects within San Mateo County. Within these guidelines, there is a screening criteria which states that if a project is located within a transit priority area (TPA), then the project is exempt from VMT analysis. This is the criteria that is applicable to this project.
2.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions as they relate to the traffic stream and perceptions by motorists and passengers. The LOS generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, delays, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience and safety. The operational LOS are given letter designations from A to F, with A representing the free-flow operating conditions and F representing the severely congested flow with high delays. Intersections generally are the capacity-controlling locations with respect to traffic operations on arterial and collector streets. The following sections provide detailed study methodology based on the type of intersections.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 14
Signalized Intersections
The study intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition for signalized intersections (HCM 6th), except two signalized intersections. The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard were evaluated using HCM method 2000. This is due to limitations with HCM 6th Edition with respect to the geometric configurations at this intersection. These methodologies determines LOS based on average control delay per vehicle for the overall intersection during peak hour intersection operating conditions. Table 1 summarizes the relationship between the control delay and LOS for signalized intersections. The LOS assessment under all scenarios is based on current traffic controls and optimized signal timing unless otherwise noted.
Table 1: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Description
A
Very low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. Progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Many vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values.
B
Control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle. There is good progression or short cycle lengths or both. More vehicles stop causing higher levels of delay.
C
Control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. Higher delays are caused by fair progression or longer cycle lengths or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. Cycle failure occurs when a given green phase does not serve queued vehicles, and overflow occurs. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
D
Control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volumes. Many vehicles stop, the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable.
E
Control delay greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per vehicle. The limit of acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volumes. Individual cycle failures are frequent.
F
Control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. Unacceptable to most drivers.
Oversaturation, arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to higher delay.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual
Unsignalized Intersections
LOS ratings for stop-sign controlled intersections are based on the average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle. At one- or two-way stop controlled intersections, the control delay is calculated for each movement, not for the intersection as a whole. Table 2 summarizes the relationship between delay and LOS for stop-controlled intersections. The delay ranges for unsignalized intersections are lower than for signalized intersections, as drivers expect less delay at stop-controlled intersections.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 15
Each of the study intersections were analyzed using Synchro Version 10 software. The LOS assessment under all scenarios is based on current traffic controls unless otherwise noted.
Table 2: Level of Service Definitions for Stop Controlled Intersections Level of Service Description
A
Very low control delay less than 10 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
B
Low control delay greater than 10 and up to 15 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
C
Acceptable control delay greater than 15 and up to 25 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
D
Tolerable control delay greater than 25 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
E
Limit of tolerable control delay greater than 35 and up to 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
F
Unacceptable control delay in excess of 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay.
Source: Highway Capacity Manual
2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
In accordance with recently updated CEQA requirements, the standards and levels of significance described below are used to determine compliance with goals and policies for each jurisdiction. They are not used for findings of significance under CEQA. It is observed that as jurisdictions are updating their policies and General Plans, levels of service standards are being replaced with VMT as the metric that satisfies overall goals of multi-modal transportation and transportation safety. This section describes the level of service policy of each jurisdiction.
City of Daly City Intersections
A majority of the study intersections are operated by the City of Daly City. According to the Circulation Element of the City’s adopted General Plan 2030 (adopted March 25, 2013), the level of service standard is LOS D at all intersections.
Policy CE-1 of the General Plan states: Use the City’s traffic model and environmental review process outlined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to ensure that the City’s existing roadway network is relatively free flowing during peak traffic periods.
Task CE-1.6 of the General Plan states: Incorporate a Level of Service (LOS) into Daly City’s Local Thresholds of Significance Guidelines and use the standard as an evaluation measure for the traffic impacts created by new discretionary projects and to identify future roadway and intersection improvements in the City’s Capital Improvement Program. This standard shall be applied as follows: Require that a minimum LOS D be maintained at all principal intersections.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 16
Caltrans Intersections
Per the updated Transportation Impact Study Guidelines dated May 20, 2020, Caltrans no longer holds a level of service policy. VMT analysis replaces level of service, the prior widely applied metric used for CEQA transportation analysis. Caltrans’ primary review focus for a land use project’s impacts is now VMT.
Town of Colma Intersections
The signalized intersection of Serramonte Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps is located in the Town of Colma and operated by Caltrans. According to the Town’s Mobility Element of the 2040 General Plan (adopted March 2022), Goal M2-5 states the following:
Strive to achieve LOS D as the planned operating condition for all arterial and collector roadway segments (“segments”) and intersections, except for (1) those specified segments and intersections for which planned LOS conditions are otherwise established; and (2) segments and intersections that are operating at LOS E or lower at the time an application for a proposed development project is submitted, if no feasible improvements exist to improve the LOS. The Town may permit the thenexisting LOS to be the minimum acceptable operating condition for those segments and intersections in category (2), provided that the LOS does not deteriorate further due to the proposed development.
City of South San Francisco Intersections
The signalized intersection of Hickey Boulevard & Junipero Serra Boulevard is located within the City of South San Francisco. According to the City’s recently adopted Mobility and Access element of the 2040 General Plan (adopted October 12, 2022), there is no mention of a level of service policy. Policy MOB-3.2 states the following:
Optimize traffic operations on City streets. Optimize traffic operations on City streets while avoiding widening roadways or otherwise pursuing traffic operations changes at expense of multimodal safety, transit reliability, or bicycle and pedestrian comfort.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 17
3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section describes existing conditions in the immediate project site vicinity, including roadway facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and available transit service. In addition, traffic volumes and operations are presented for the study intersections, including the results of LOS calculations.
3.1 EXISTING SETTING AND ROADWAY SYSTEM
I-280 is a north south, eight lane freeway with a posted speed limit of 65 miles per hour (mph). The northsouth freeway connects Daly City with nearby cities such as San Francisco to the north and San Jose to the south. It also provides access to the greater regional freeway network with direct connections to Interstate 380, US Highway 101, State Route 1, and Skyline Boulevard (SR-35). Bicyclists and pedestrians are not allowed on this facility.
Hickey Boulevard is a generally east west, four lane collector with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Hickey Boulevard connects the project site to I-280, Junipero Serra Boulevard, and Skyline Boulevard. One existing driveway on the project site connects to Hickey Boulevard. Class III shared lane bike route markings were recently marked near the project. Sidewalks and crosswalks are provided in the vicinity of the project, although to the east of the project, sidewalks are provided only on one side.
Gellert Boulevard is a north-south collector roadway with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Gellert Boulevard is two lanes south of Hickey Boulevard and widens up to six lanes between Hickey Boulevard and Serramonte Boulevard. Class II bike lanes are marked south of Serravista Avenue. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway.
Junipero Serra Boulevard is a north south, four-to-six lane arterial located to the east of the project. The posted speed limit on Junipero Serra Boulevard is 50 mph south of Hickey Boulevard and 40 mph north of Hickey Boulevard. Junipero Serra Boulevard runs roughly parallel to I-280. Class II bike lanes are marked on a majority of Junipero Serra Boulevard in the vicinity of the project. South of Hickey Boulevard sidewalks are not provided.
Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 is a north-south highway located to the west of the project. South of Hickey Boulevard, Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 is two lanes and has a posted speed limit of 45 mph. North of Hickey Boulevard, Skyline Boulevard widens to six lanes and becomes a freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph. There are no designated bicycle or pedestrian facilities.
Serramonte Boulevard is an east west, generally four lane collector with a speed limit of 30 mph, located to the north of the project. Class II Bike Lanes are marked from Serramonte Mall to Callan Boulevard.
Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway near the project.
Callan Boulevard is a north-south, two lane local roadway with on-street parking, Class II bike lanes and sidewalks.
Serravista Avenue is a north-south two lane local roadway that turns east-west at the project location.
On-street parking and sidewalks are available on both sides of the roadway.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 18
Victoria Street is an east-west two lane local roadway with on-street parking and sidewalks on both sides.
Between Gellert Boulevard and Callan Boulevard, Class III shared lane bicycle route markings are provided.
3.2 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
Walkability is defined as the ability to travel easily and safely between various origins and destinations without having to rely on automobiles or other motorized travel. The ideal “walkable” community includes wide sidewalks, a mix of land uses such as residential, employment, and shopping opportunities, a limited number of conflict points with vehicle traffic, and easy access to transit facilities, and services.
Pedestrian facilities are comprised of crosswalks, sidewalks, pedestrian signals, and off-street paths, which provide safe and convenient routes for pedestrians to access the destinations such as institutions, businesses, public transportation, and recreation facilities.
The project is located on a primarily commercial corridor, with multiple shopping centers and other commercial uses nearby, as well as bordering a residential area. The existing pedestrian facilities in the study area as shown in Figure 3a.
Within the project vicinity, there are sidewalks or other walkways present on one or both sides of most streets, as well as numerous marked crosswalks, and pedestrian signal heads at signalized intersections.
3.3 EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
The City of Daly City adopted the Walk Bike Daly City Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan in 2020. It contains the policy vision, design guidance, and specific recommendations to guide the development of pedestrian and bicycle facilities to make walking and bicycling safer, more convenient and popular. Bicycle facilities include the following:
Bike Paths/Multi-use Paths (Class I) – Paved trails that are separated from roadways Bike Lanes (Class II) – Lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles through striping, pavement legends, and signs
Bike Routes/Bike Boulevards (Class III) –Roadways for shared bicycle use designated by signs or other markings that may or may not include additional pavement width for cyclists Separated Bikeways (Class IV) – Bikeways that are physically separated from vehicle traffic by vertical elements, such as grade separation, flexible posts, or parking lanes The existing bicycle facilities in the study area are shown in Figure 3b. There currently are no planned bicycle facilities as several of these facilities were recently installed to complete the bicycle network.
Within the project vicinity, there are Class II bike lanes on Gellert Boulevard south of Hickey Boulevard and on Callan Boulevard. Class III bike routes are located on Serramonte Boulevard, Hickey Boulevard, Gellert Boulevard north of Hickey Boulevard and Victoria Street
3.4 EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES
Transit services within the project vicinity are provided by San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) and the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART). The existing transit facilities are shown in Figure 3c.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 19
SamTrans – SamTrans provides local bus routes within San Mateo County, express routes, and multi-city routes. SamTrans also operates multiple local routes with limited service to high schools. Table 3 describes weekday and weekend bus services and frequency as they are currently operating.
Within a half-mile of the project, there are several bus stops that serve multiple bus routes. Routes 112 and 120 provide service to Colma BART station. Route 122 provides service to South San Francisco BART and San Francisco State. Route 130 provides service to Daly City BART. Route 35 provides local service to El Camino High School.
According to the SamTrans website, there is an existing bus stop for Route 130 providing service to Daly City BART located along the project frontage on Hickey Boulevard. However, there is no signage for this bus stop. It is recommended that SamTrans be contacted to determine if a stop is currently operating at this location.
BART - BART provides passenger service within the metropolitan Bay Area. BART currently has five main operating lines: Antioch-SFO/Millbrae, Dublin/Pleasanton-Daly City, Berryessa/North San Jose-Richmond, Berryessa/North San Jose-Daly City, and Richmond-Millbrae There are also connectors to Oakland International Airport (OAK) and San Francisco International Airport (SFO). BART operates between 5:00 a.m. and midnight on weekdays and between 6:00 a.m. and midnight on Saturdays and between 8:00 a.m. and midnight on Sundays. On weekdays, most lines operate at 15-minute intervals through most of the day and 30-minute intervals after 8:00 p.m. The closest BART station is approximately 1.5 miles east located in South San Francisco just off El Camino Real.
Table 3: Existing Bus Routes
No. From To
Weekdays Saturday Sunday
Operating Hours
Headway
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
Operating
Hours
Headway
(minutes)
351 El Camino
High
Warwick /
Christen
7:55 – 8:30 a.m.,
2:45 – 3;45 p.m.
10 - - - -
112 Colma BART Linda Mar
Park & Ride
6:00 a.m. – 9:45
p.m.
60 8:00 a.m. –
8:45 p.m.
60 8:00 a.m. –
8:45 p.m.
60 120 Colma BART Brunswick/
Templeton
4:00 a.m. –
11:45 p.m.
10 peak,
30 off-peak
4:00 a.m. –
11:45 p.m.
15-45
4:00 a.m. –
11:00 p.m.
15-45
121 Skyline
College
Pope/
Bellevue
6:30 a.m. –
10:30 p.m.
60 7:30 a.m. –
10:30 p.m.
60 7:30 a.m. –
9:00 p.m.
60 122 Stonestown/
SF State
South San
Francisco
BART
5:15 a.m. –
11:30 p.m.
30 8:00 a.m. –
11:30 p.m.
30 8:00 a.m. –
11:30 p.m.
30 130 Airport/Linden Daly City
BART
5:00 a.m. –
midnight
15 peak,
30 off-peak
7:00 a.m. –
9:15 p.m.
30 6:45 a.m. –
8L00 p.m.
30 Notes:
1 Operates on school days only
Source: www.samtrans.com accessed June 10, 2021.
Hickey Blvd.
Serravista Ave.
Marbly Ave.
Berta Cir.
Gellert Blvd.
Victoria St.
9 7
1 2 4
3 13
8 280
N
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Hickey Blvd.
Callan Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Skyline Blvd.
Gellert Blvd.
See Detail
5 17
16 15
14 10
11 12
13 1
9 7
6 280
Marked Crosswalk
Footpath
Project Site
X Study Intersection
Project Driveway
LEGEND
Figure 3a: Existing Pedestrian Facilities
TJKM
134-014 | 04/2023
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Sidewalk
Marked Crosswalk
Hickey Blvd.
Serravista Ave.
Marbly Ave.
Berta Cir.
Gellert Blvd.
Victoria St.
9 7
1 2 4
3 13
8 280
N
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Hickey Blvd.
Callan Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Skyline Blvd.
Gellert Blvd.
See Detail
5 17
16 15
14 10
11 12
13 1
9 7
6 280
Footpath
Project Site
X Study Intersection
Project Driveway
LEGEND
Figure 3b: Existing Bicycle Facilities
TJKM
134-014 | 04/2023
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route
Hickey Blvd.
Serravista Ave.
Marbly Ave.
Berta Cir.
Gellert Blvd.
Victoria St.
9 7
1 2 4
3 13
8 280
N
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Hickey Blvd.
Callan Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Skyline Blvd.
Gellert Blvd.
See Detail
Serramonte Center
5 17
16 15
14 10
11 12
13 1
9 7
6 280
Serramonte Blvd.
Figure 3c: Existing Transit Facilities
Project Site
X Study Intersection
Project Driveway
LEGEND
TJKM
134-014 | 04/2023
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Bus Route 120
Bus Route 121
Bus Route 122
Bus Route 16
Bus Route 112
Bus Route 130
Bus Stop
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 23
3.5 ESTIMATED EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The existing operations of the seventeen study intersections were evaluated for the highest one-hour volumes during weekday morning (7-9 a.m.) and evening (4-6 p.m.) peak periods. This study began in May 2021. Peak hour turning movement counts were collected on Tuesday, July 20th, 2021. These counts were compared to turning movement counts which were collected prior to the Covid pandemic at the intersections of Junipero Serra Boulevard (collected November 2019) at Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard at Hickey Boulevard (collected November 2017). The turning movement counts were much lower than expected due to continued disrupted travel patterns due to the Covid pandemic.
In consultation with the City of Daly City staff, turning movement volumes were adjusted using a factor of
1.88 for the a.m. peak hour counts and 1.18 for the p.m. peak hour counts. These factors were based on the two intersections with comparable counts, to conservatively adjust volumes up to a pre-pandemic level.
Appendix A includes the raw data collected for the existing turning movement volumes for the study intersections.
3.6 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing operations of the study intersections were evaluated for the highest one-hour volume during the weekday morning and evening peak periods based on the adjusted existing vehicle volumes as described above. The results of the LOS analysis using the Synchro 10 software program for Existing Conditions are summarized in Table 4. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Under this scenario, 15 of the 17 study intersections operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours.
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 operates at LOS E during the a.m. peak hour.
The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 NB Ramp operates at LOS F during both peak hours.
Both of these signalized intersections are operated by Caltrans which no longer has a LOS policy. The intersection of Hickey Boulevard at Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 is located in Daly City and does not meet the City’s General Plan policy for level of service D or better.
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 24
Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis – Existing Conditions ID Study Intersections Control Peak
Hour1 Delay2 LOS3
1 Serravista Ave. & Gellert Blvd. One-Way
Stop
AM 25.5 D
PM 16.6 C
2 Serravista Ave. & Marbly Ave. One-Way
Stop
AM 10.6 B
PM 9.5 A
3 Serravista Ave. & Victoria St. Two-Way
Stop
AM 10.5 B
PM 9.0 A
4 Serravista Ave. & Project Driveway One-Way
Stop
AM 0.0 A
PM 8.7 A
5 Hickey Blvd. & Junipero Serra Blvd. Signal AM 19.7 B
PM 30.2 C
6 Hickey Blvd. & I-280 NB Ramps Signal AM 35.8 D
PM 41.9 D
7 Hickey Blvd. & I-280 SB Ramps Signal AM 16.8 B
PM 14.6 B
8 Hickey Blvd. & Project Driveway One-Way
Stop
AM 0.0 A
PM 14.9 B
9 Hickey Blvd. & Gellert Blvd. Signal AM 49.7 D
PM 32.8 C
10 Hickey Blvd. & Callan Blvd. Signal AM 21.8 C
PM 27.4 C
11 Hickey Blvd. & Campus Dr. Signal AM 15.2 B
PM 11.0 B
12 Hickey Blvd. & Skyline Blvd./SR-35 Signal AM 71.2 E
PM 38.2 D
13 Gellert Blvd. & Victoria St. All-Way
Stop
AM 28.1 D
PM 28.9 D
14 Gellert Blvd. & Serramonte Blvd. Signal AM 20.8 C
PM 35.5 D
15 Serramonte Blvd. & I-280 SB Ramps Signal AM 11.3 B
PM 22.2 C
16 Serramonte Blvd. & I-280 NB Ramps Signal AM 3.0 A
PM 4.4 A
17 Serramonte Blvd. & Junipero Serra
Blvd./I-280 NB Ramps Signal AM 154.5 FPM 201.5 F
Notes:
1 AM – morning peak hour, PM – evening peak hour
2 Delay – Whole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections. Total control delay for the worst movement is presented for side-street stop controlled intersections.
3 LOS – Level of Service
Bold text indicates intersection operates below level of service D.
!"#$%&
!"#$
&
!"#$%&
!"#$%&
'(
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
!"#$
&
+
+
(
*
'(
Stop Sign
Traffic Signal
X Study Intersection
LEGEND
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 4: Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls
!"
#$
!"
%
%"
&
#$
'(
1 2 3 )
4 5 6 7 8
9 10
"
"
!"
"
!"
"
)
11 12
13 14
17 15 16
!"#$%&
!"#$
&
!"#$
&
!"#$%&
!"#$%&
'(
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
+
+
(
*
'(
XX AM Peak Hour Volumes
Stop Sign (XX) PM Peak Hour Volumes
Traffic Signal
X Study Intersection
LEGEND
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 5. Existing Conditions AM & PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
!"
#$
!"
%
%"
&
#$
'(
1 2 3 )
4 5 6 7 8
9 10
"
"
!"
"
!"
"
)
11 12
13 14
17 15 16
139 (79)
9 (8)
137 (84)
2 (2)
6 (1)
0 (1)
8 (17)
86 (86)
9 (0)
737 (576)
820 (677)
207 (150)
120 (86)
739 (1509)
38 (17)
49 (92)
11 (5)
9 (0)
0 (0)
23 (7)
128 (59)
0 (1)
2 (5)
36 (77)
4 (11)
353 (294)
652 (787)
71 (137)
417 (649)
370 (522)
96 (136)
120 (123)
444 (352)
124 (98)
271 (227)
288 (434)
310 (284)
128 (182)
859 (763)
323 (217)
49 (53)
543 (730)
113 (210)
530 (761)
56 (90)
470 (422)
128 (100)
169 (90)
68 (60)
822 (1280)
387 (361)
1557 (1214)
6 (0)
1081 (1653)
88 (35)
0 (39)
90 (119)
650 (391)
21 (25)
427 (675)
323 (422)
331 (556)
51 (71)
233 (267)
553 (278)
88 (196)
164 (314)
348 (553)
188 (144)
635 (424)
60 (100)
71 (129)
363 (519)
17 (68)
350 (655)
85 (52)
293 (182)
34 (34)
164 (192)
133 (207)
68 (41)
664 (356)
455 (284)
180 (142)
254 (256)
188 (340)
60 (111)
111 (179)
910 (573)
90 (85)
321 (653)
453 (623)
194 (204)
194 (98)
17 (14)
17 (21)
56 (24)
23 (14)
6 (5)
24 (35)
404 (245)
6 (7)
86 (163)
246 (430)
24 (22)
496 (913)
991 (845)
340 (494)
801 (758)
284 (339)
102 (103)
385 (437)
214 (391)
229 (223)
60 (136)
464 (450)
421 (494)
280 (171)
133 (222)
81 (148)
280 (365)
118 (144)
66 (64)
333 (411)
212 (289)
171 (575)
246 (366)
395 (553)
226 (354)
141 (301)
291 (592)
15 (65)
179 (309)
149 (502)
308 (727)
1429 (1631)
2 (15)
348 (644)
752 (483)
17 (14)
15 (9)
0 (0)
117 (63)
688 (510)
344 (734)
94 (160)
8 (0)
139 68)
348 (408)
2 (5)
583 (552)
265 (135)
348 (632)
0 (18)
0 (0)
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 27
4.0 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
This analysis scenario presents the impacts of the proposed project at 455 Hickey Boulevard on the study intersections. This scenario is similar to Existing Conditions, but with the addition of projected traffic from the proposed development.
4.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
TJKM developed estimated project trip generation for the proposed project based on published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation 10th Edition. For the proposed project, TJKM used published trip rates for the ITE land uses General Office Building (ITE Code 710) and Medical-Dental Office Building (ITE Code 720). The project site is currently occupied by an existing 81,460 square foot office building that would be replaced. Trips generated by the existing uses were estimated with trip rates for General Office Building (ITE Code 710). Estimated existing trips were deducted from the project trip generation for each project alternative for the purpose of level of service impact as these trips already exist on the roadway network.
As shown in Table 5a, the proposed Alternative 1 is expected to generate 5,471 net new daily trips, including 406 net new a.m. peak hour trips (309 in, 97 out) and 529 net new p.m. peak hour trips (159 in, 370 out). As shown in Table 5b, the proposed Alternative 2 is expected to generate 1,934 net new daily trips, including 231 net new a.m. peak hour trips (199 in, 32 out) and 228 net new p.m. peak hour trips (36 in, 192 out).
Table 5a: Project Net Trip Generation – Project Alternative 1 Land Use (ITE Code)1
Size
(ksf)
Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Proposed Uses
Medical-Dental Office Building (720) 180 34.80 6,264 2.78 78:22 390 110 500 3.46 28:72 174 449 623 Proposed Subtotal 6,264 390 110 500 174 449 623
Existing Uses
General Office Building (710) 81.46 9.74 793 1.16 86:14 81 13 94 1.15 16:84 15 79 94 Net New Trips 5,471 309 97 406 159 370 529
Notes:
1 Source: ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition
Table 5b: Project Net Trip Generation – Project Alternative 2 Land Use (ITE Code)1
Size
(ksf)
Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak
Rate Trips Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Proposed Uses
General Office Building (710) 280 9.74 2727 1.16 86:14 280 45 325 1.15 16:84 52 270 322 Proposed Subtotal 2,727 280 45 325 51 271 322
Existing Uses
General Office Building (710) 81.46 9.74 793 1.16 86:14 81 13 94 1.15 16:84 15 79 94 Net New Trips 1,934 199 32 231 36 192 228
Notes:
1 Source: ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 28
4.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT
Trip distribution is a process that determines in what proportion vehicles are expected to travel between the project site and various destinations outside the project study area. Assignment determines the various routes that vehicles would take from the project site to each destination using the estimated trip distribution. Trip distribution assumptions were determined in consultation with City of Daly City staff.
Net new trips associated with the proposed project were distributed as follows:
25 percent to/from I-280 to/from the south
22 percent to/from I-280 to/from the north via Hickey Boulevard 3 percent to/from I-280 to/from the north via Serramonte Boulevard 10 percent to/from Hickey Boulevard to/from the east
10 percent to/from Junipero Serra Boulevard to/from the south 10 percent to/from Skyline Boulevard to/from the south 10 percent to/from Skyline Boulevard to/from the north 5 percent to/from Gellert Boulevard to/from the south 5 percent to/from Junivero Serra Boulevard to/from the north According to the project site plans shown in Figure 2, both development alternatives include a new parking structure with one driveway on Hickey Boulevard and one on Serravista Avenue. The Hickey Boulevard driveway would retain its existing access pattern with left and right turns into the parking structure with a median left turn pocket, but would restrict outbound vehicles to right turns only.
Approximately 60 percent of the entering and existing traffic is forecast to utilize the Hickey Boulevard driveway due to direct access and reduced travel distance via a right turn out to the destinations east and south of the project. 40 percent of the project traffic is forecast to utilize the Serravista Avenue driveway.
Trips assigned to driveways are gross project trips, without deductions for the existing use.
Figure 6 illustrates the trip distribution percentages and the trip assignment developed for the proposed project. The assigned project trips were then added to the adjusted existing traffic volumes under Existing Conditions, to generate Existing plus Project Conditions traffic volumes.
N
Junipero Serra Blvd.
Serramonte Blvd.
Hickey Blvd.
Callan Blvd.
Campus Dr.
Skyline Blvd.
Gellert Blvd.
5 17
16 15
14 10
11 12
13 1
9 7
6 280
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 6a. Project Trip Distribution
Project Site
X Study Intersection
Project Driveway
LEGEND
XX% Trip Distribution
10%
10%
5% 25%
22%
10%
10%
5%
3%
!"#$%&
!"#$
&
!"#$
&
!"#$%&
!"#$%&
'(
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
+
+
(
*
'(
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 6b. Project Trip Assignment, Alternative 1
XX AM Peak Hour Volumes
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volumes
X Study Intersection
LEGEND
!"
#$
!"
%
%"
&
#$
'(
1 2 3 )
4 5 6 7 8
9 10
"
"
!"
"
!"
"
)
11 12
13 14
17 15 16
34 (130) 15 (8)
34 (130)
124 (64)
41 (155)
8 (30)
156 (70)
5 (19)
10 (37)
10 (37)
31 (16)
19 (74)
21 (81)
62 (32)
31 (16)
77 (40) 8 (13)
139 (72)
8 (31)
234 (104)
27 (12)
66 (269)
62 (32)
22 (11)
19 (74)
8 (30)
7 (26)
25 (13)
62 (32)
19 (74)
15 (8)
10 (37)
10 (37) 31 (16)
31 (16)
25 (13)
9 (5)
15 (8)
5 (19)
5 (19) 15 (8)
3 (11)
5 (19)
15 (8)
62 (32)
108 (56)
68 (35) 19 (74)
39 (157)
6 (22)
!"#$%&
!"#$
&
!"#$
&
!"#$%&
!"#$%&
'(
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
)*
+
+
(
*
'(
XX AM Peak Hour Volumes
(XX) PM Peak Hour Volumes
134-014 | 04/2023
TJKM
455 Hickey Boulevard TIS
Figure 6c. Project Trip Assignment, Alternative 2
X Study Intersection
LEGEND
!"
#$
!"
%
%"
&
#$
'(
1 2 3 )
4 5 6 7 8
9 10
"
"
!"
"
!"
"
)
11 12
13 14
17 15 16
11 (67)
0 (0)
80 (15)
11 (67)
0 (0)
10 (2)
13 (80)
3 (15)
112 (21)
2 (10)
3 (19)
3 (19)
20 (4) 20 (4)
6 (19)
7 (42)
40 (7) 50 (9) 3 (15)
90 (17)
3 (19)
20 (40)
168 (31)
27 (162)
40 (7)
14 (3)
6 (38)
3 (15)
2 (13)
16 (3)
40 (7)
6 (38)
10 (2)
3 (19)
3 (19) 20 (4)
20 (4)
16 (3)
6 (1)
0 (0)
10 (2)
2 (10)
2 (10) 10 (2)
1 (6)
2 (10)
0 (0)
10 (2)
40 (7)
70 (13)
44 (8) 6 (38)
16 (95)
2 (14)
455 Hickey Boulevard Traffic Impact Study
P a g e | 32
4.4 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS – EXISTING PLUS PROJECT ALTERNATIVE 1 CONDITIONS Figure 7a summarizes the project turning movement volumes at the study intersections for the Existing plus Project Alternative 1 Conditions. The intersection LOS analysis results are summarized in Table 7a.
LOS worksheets and are provided in Appendix C.
Under this scenario, 15 of the 17 study intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS D or better during both peak hours.
Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35
The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard/SR-35 (Intersection #12) degrades from LOS E with 71.2 seconds to LOS F with 78.0 seconds during the a.m. peak hour. This is an increase of 6.8 seconds of delay. The project adds 82 trips to this intersection during the a.m. peak hour.
To reduce the delay to pre-project levels, physical improvements are required. One option to reduce total delay is to convert the eastbound right turn lane to a shared through-right lane, thus providing a second through lane. This would require modifying the intersection by eliminating the right turn channelization islands for the eastbound and northbound directions, as well as installing a larger signal mast arm for the southbound direction. This physical improvement delay is reduced to 61.5 seconds and LOS E. This improvement more than mitigates the project’s impact on the intersection but still does not meet City of Daly City LOS policy.
This intersection is operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at this intersection. Since this intersection currently operates below an acceptable level of service, this project should contribute a fair share toward this improvement, if it is deemed necessary.
Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps The intersection of Serramonte Boulevard at Junipero Serra Boulevard/I-280 Northbound Ramps (Intersection #17) continues to operate at LOS F during both peak hours. The project adds 0.5 seconds of delay in the a.m. peak hour and 5.3 seconds of delay in the p.m. peak hour for a total of 102.7 seconds and 154.8 seconds, respectively. The project adds 20 vehicles to this intersection during the a.m. peak hour and 27 vehicles during the p.m. peak hour. This intersection is located in the City of Colma and operated by Caltrans.
If a mitigation is desirable, it is possible to reduce delay with modified signal timing. With optimized timings, the delay in the a.m. peak hour is 37.5 seconds, which is 64.7 seconds less than existing conditions, and 47.5 seconds in the p.m. peak hour, which is 102.0 seconds less than existing conditions.
This improvement more than mitigates the project’s impact on the intersection.
Based on the Town of Colma’s LOS policy, since this intersection is already operating at LOS F, this is the baseline for measurement of impact. This intersection is operated by Caltrans which no longer has a level of service policy. Caltrans should be consulted to determine what, if any, improvements are necessary at this intersection. Since this intersection currently operates below an acceptable level of service and this project adds a marginal number of trips, this project should contribute a fair share toward this improvement, if it is deemed necessary.