Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda
VIA TELECONFERENCE ONLY
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California
February 22, 2022 City Council Meeting
INFORMATION RECEIVED
AFTER THE COUNCIL AGENDA
WAS DISTRIBUTED
(“Red Dots”)
1 From: John Gillies <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 9:28 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Solid Waste Hauling Contract
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Members of the City Council,
I understand that you are considering awarding a contract for solid waste hauling at your February 22 meeting. I would like to urge you to award that contract Waste Management. I have been extremely pleased with the service they have provided, They are courteous, consistent and helpful, from their drivers to their customer service. If it were my decision, I would be willing to pay a little extra to retain such a well run, customer friendly company with a proven record in our community.
Please vote, once again, to award the contract to Waste Management.
Thank you,
John Gillies
2136 San Dieguito Drive
1 February 22, 2022 Item 09
1 From: Kelly Welch <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2022 4:23 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Waste Management
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom it May Concern:
It would be a crime to switch to a different company from the one we currently have. The men who work Waste Management trucks are efficient, accommodating, and friendly with excellent service that could not be any better!! Why would we give up such a good thing?? My husband and I have gotten to know these men over the years and see firsthand that they are hard workers and do a great job! PLEASE do not switch companies!! Kelly and Pat Welch
431 8th Street
1 February 22, 2022 Item 09
1 February 22, 2022 Item 09
2 February 22, 2022 Item 09
3 February 22, 2022 Item 09
1 From: Ann Feeney <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:42 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot letter for item #9
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and City councilmembers,
I strongly approve of the selection of EDCO as our new waste hauler as recommended in the staff report. In 2016, California passed SB 1383 into law which states that by January 1, 2022, organic waste needs to be diverted from landfills and converted into “environmentally beneficial uses of biomethane derived from solid waste facilities”. The law gave ample time for waste haulers to establish such organics recycling facilities. EDCO did in fact use that time to build its anerobic digestion facility in Escondido which converts organic waste into renewable natural gas to run their trucks. Waste Management has not done so. Waste Management has a small facility in Orange, CA. The point of diverting organic waste from landfills to anaerobic digesters is to reduce emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas that is released in landfills from organic waste, and instead convert it into useful product. Even if Waste Management has the capacity to handle Del Mar in Orange (and I do not know whether they do), the greenhouse gas emissions from trucking all of the organic waste to Orange is huge, and defeats the purpose of the ordinance. EDCO will only have to bring the organic waste to nearby Escondido.
12 of our neighboring cities, including Solana Beach and Encinitas, have EDCO as their waste hauler, and they all began organic recycling on January 1, 2022. Residents that I have talked to are very pleased with that service.
The main reason that I have heard that people want to retain Waste Management as their waste hauler is that people like the personnel that pick up our recycling and waste. However, EDCO will offer all of the drivers from Waste Management jobs with EDCO with comparable pay and benefits, and will retain the seniority that they have with Waste Management currently. Hence, we are likely to retain all of the personnel that our residents know and appreciate.
Sincerely,
Ann Feeney
Rimini Road
4 February 22, 2022 Item 09
1 From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:48 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden
Cc: Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Terry Gaasterland; Sudeepto Roy Subject: Red Dot: item 9 (Reference: Clerk’s File No. 406-1, 906-9) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor Worden, Deputy Mayor Martinez, and Councilmembers, I am writing in support of the staff recommendation to award Del Mar’s solid waste franchise agreement to EDCO Disposal Corporation, with its Escondido facility, for the next decade. In September 2021, the City Council adopted its Request for Proposal in search for a solid waste provider aiming to award “the franchise agreement to the proposer that the City determines will best meet the City’s goal of receiving the highest quality service at the lowest reasonable cost” (RFP 2021 -XX, p.6/ meeting packet, p.197). https://www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_09072021-2816 I hear that some residents of Del Mar would prefer to maintain service with Waste Management, which “declined the City’s offer for a facility site visit” (City Council Agenda Report, February 22, 2022, p.6/ meeting packet, p.354). https://www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_02222022-2922 Considering that Waste Management does not even have a local facility to process organic food waste (will they truck my banana peels to LA for composting?) and offers services at a significant premium (ratepayers would pay approximately $2.9 million more versus EDCO’s rates), I do not see a reason why Del Mar would consider awarding the agreement to this proposer.
As for maintaining employees that residents have come to appreciate, we can all rest assured that we can have our cake and eat it too, since EDCO “Includes a commitment to retain the drivers from the City’s current service provider with comparable pay and benefits, as well as honoring their seniority with their current employer” (City Council Agenda Report, February 22, 2022, p.7/ meeting packet, p.355).
I am confident that the multistep process accomplished in the past several months by our Del Mar staff members is coming to an adequate conclusion, based on the criteria adopted by our City Council.
Respected elected officials, thank you for taking the next step towards achieving full compliance with SB 1383.
Best regards,
Valerie Dufort-Roy
Klish Way
5 February 22, 2022 Item 09
RED DOT LETTER FOR ITEM 9, FEB. 22ND 2022 COUNCIL MEETING Dear Mayor Worden, Deputy Mayor Martinez, Council Members Druker, Gaasterland, and Quirk,
I strongly support the staff recommendation to award the Waste Contract to EDCO for the following reasons:
1. It is the lowest responsible bid. To award the contract to another bidder is to invite legal action.
2. It is the best option for the environment, with access to the nearby EDCO anaerobic digester in Escondido, generation of gas that will fuel the EDCO trucks, and use of lighter trucks that are more fuel efficient and will have less impact on Del Mar’s streets and alleys.
3. EDCO is a local Southern California company, not a national enterprise with high overhead. Note that Waste Management had two Superbowl ads (at $6M each) and sponsors a PGA golf tournament in Arizona.
4. EDCO pledged to hire any Waste Management personnel displaced if EDCO is awarded the contract.
5. Other coastal cities (including Solana Beach and Encinitas) have used EDCO for years and their customers report satisfaction with EDCO service.
6. Waste Management has known for at least 5 years that food waste recycling would be required, but they have made no steps to prepare for it. EDCO is ready to comply with state recycling requirements.
Donald Mosier, Rimini Road
6 February 22, 2022 Item 09
1 Melinda Gould
From: (null) tsdowling <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:09 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Terie S Dowling
Sent from my iPhone
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Christy Signorio <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:12 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Greg and Christy Signorio
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mike Cannon <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:26 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Mike Cannon
Sent from my iPhone
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Deborah STERN <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:27 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Deborah B. Stern
972-877-5490
4 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tim Bonatus <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:30 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Timothy J Bonatus
Sent from my iPhone
5 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Charles Hicks <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:32 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
C. B. Hicks
Sincerely,
Get Outlook for Android
6 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Renata Engel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:34 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Renata Engel
Sent from my iPhone
7 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Charles Hicks <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:35 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Josephine M. Zerilli-hicks
Sincerely,
Get Outlook for Android
8 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:40 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Kemp
Sent from my iPhone
9 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: david cummings <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:42 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
David Cummings
999 N Pacific E-301
Oceanside, CA 92054
10 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mark Evans <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:42 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Ryan Keim; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mark Evans
858.229.8516
11 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Katherine Ross <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:50 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Katherine Ruiz
12 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jeanie Betancourt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:55 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
All the best,
Jeanie Betancourt
13 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Chris Burgess <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:14 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Chris Burgess
1513 So Pacific Street
Oceanside
--
Chris Burgess
14 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:15 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review.
Pete Folz
Nielsen Builders
15 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kevin Bauer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:18 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Kevin Bauer
Sent from my iPhone
16 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dillions <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:26 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
Please remove the proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan from the Del Mar City Council agenda.
The resolution is not only premature, but done without appropriate preparatory steps. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar and mitigation efforts, all yet to be fully vetted and discussed. OCEANSIDE WOULDN’T DO TO YOU WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO TO THEM.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR!!!!!!
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
17 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: shay sanders <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:31 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Shay Sanders
Get Outlook for Android
18 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Robin Rauschl <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:40 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Robin Rauschl
Oceanside California
19 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Bob Ashton <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:53 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Bob Ashton
808-429-1770
20 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Rob Olague <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:57 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Rob Olague
Sent from a mobile device. Pls excuse tyypos or brevity. 21 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dean Ramadan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:59 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dean
22 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Faylene Groenenberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:11 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del 23 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Home Pecsok <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Phil
Sent from my iPhone
310-701-1870
24 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Melina Montoya <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:34 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Melina Montoya
--
Melina Montoya
626-441-8341 Home
626-376-1629 Cell
25 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Neil Anderson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:41 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Russ Cunningham; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Neil Anderson
President of the Board of Directors
North Coast Village
Oceanside CA
26 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Paul J <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:49 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Paul Johnson
27 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: jenifer mckinley <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:50 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jenifer Mckinley Sent from my iPhone
28 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tom Launder <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:22 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of% 29 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Wilson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Annie Wilson
Oceanside resident
Sent from my iPhone
30 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: joy cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase.
Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del 31 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Debbie Kraus <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Deborah Kraus
Sent from my iPhone
32 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Justin Matthews <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:36 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Justin Matthews
Sent from my iPhone
33 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lisa Decrausaz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:41 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
34 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lisa Decrausaz <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:42 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Alicia Decrausaz
35 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Darryl Feltovich <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:01 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Darryl Feltovich
Sent from my iPad
36 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: ROCK POWELL <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:09 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
As a 40 year resident of Oceanside, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. Give Oceanside a chance to finish the proposal.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Rocky Powell
1747 S Pacific St
Oceanside, CA
37 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:18 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase.
Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Terry Conwell
38 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:39 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Be a good (distant) neighbor, Del Mar!
Joe & Barbara Engleson
39 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jon Studer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:40 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jon Studer
Oceanside Resident
40 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lori Brandt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:22 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lori Brandt
Sent from my iPhone
41 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Matthew Mattison <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:44 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, <BR> <BR>I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. <BR> <BR>The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. <BR> <BR>Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. <BR> <BR>In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. <BR> <BR>For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your consideration. <BR> <BR>Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
42 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mark Bishop <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:48 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mark Bishop
CCIE#21094
858-952-4854
43 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jordan Dillion <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:54 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jordan Dillion
Sent from my iPhone
44 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Joseph Arendsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 12:09 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Joseph Arendsen
150 S Myers St #2, Oceanside CA
760-672-0174
45 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: mike colasuonno <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 12:34 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Michael Colasuonno
46 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Emily Harper <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 12:20 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
--
Emily Harper
(714) 294-6618
47 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Linda Scott Hendrick <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 1:17 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Linda Scott Hendrick
--
Linda Scott Hendrick, PhD
[email protected]
[email protected]
951-312-4228
48 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Blair Nicholas <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Blair Nicholas
49 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Elise Walker <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 1:39 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Elise Wetherell
50 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Marylucia Arace <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marylucia Arace
51 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jakki Sencer <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Jakki Sencer
[email protected]
626-233-5229
901 S. Pacific St
Oceanside
Sent from my iPhone
52 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Michael Jones <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 3:22 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The Oceanside Plan is still in the design phase, why not wait to see what the plan is before this rush to judgement. Better yet, since our communities are all struggling with similar erosion problems, why not join forces and collaborate on a solution that will benefit all of us? Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Michael G. Jones, #24 St. Malo, Oceanside, CA, 92054
53 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jim Spadoni <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 3:22 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Please give us folks in Oceanside and our neighbor cities, a chance to save our natural shoreline for the enjoyment of residents and the important tourist industry here.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jim Spadoni, resident and small business owner
4366 Pacifica Way Unit 10
54 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Oceanside, CA 92056
55 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Karie Lasko <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 4:03 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Karie Lasko
South Oceanside
Sent from my iPhone
56 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cameron Kruger <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 4:05 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. As a South Oceanside resident and surfer, I would love to see a sand retention plan in place.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Cameron
57 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 4:08 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lawrence R King
Sent from my iPhone
58 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: bonnie holt <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 4:56 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Bonnie and Dick Holt
59 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tom Jones <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 4:56 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
________________________________
60 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 THIS COMMUNICATION AND ANY ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED. THEY ARE INTENDED FOR THE SOLE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. IF YOU RECEIVE THIS TRANSMISSION IN ERROR, YOU ARE ADVISED
THAT ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, OR THE TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. MOREOVER, ANY SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL NOT COMPROMISE OR WAIVE THE ADVISOR-CLIENT OR OTHER PRIVILEGES AS TO THIS COMMUNICATION OR OTHERWISE. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY ME VIA RETURN E-MAIL OR BY TELEPHONE AT (626) 795-7583. THANK YOU.
61 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: John Rouse <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:03 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Rouse
Oceanside, CA
62 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Hank Stern <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:05 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Hank Stern
2035 S Pacific
Oceanside, ca
92054
--
Hank
63 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Marianne Werdel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:05 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marianne Werdel
mariannewerdel.com
[email protected]
858-472-6585
Sent from my iPhone
64 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Marianne Werdel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:06 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marianne Werdel
mariannewerdel.com
[email protected]
858-472-6585
Sent from my iPhone
65 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: P&R Engel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:35 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Paul Engel
Sent from my iPhone
66 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Bergen Junge <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:21 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Bergen Junge
67 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tom Harris <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:23 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
68 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: bobw valatek.com <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:40 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Robert Walker
760-522-5878
69 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cory Whitlock (Ink) <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:08 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Thank You,
Cory Whitlock
CEO
Whitlock Industries, Inc.
70 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 609 Mission Avenue
Oceanside, CA 92054
C 760.518.4456
O 760.231.9262
71 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lisa Harper <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:12 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lisa Harper
Sent from my iPhone
72 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:59 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Klein
1601 S pacific
Oceanside ca 92054
73 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mike Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:14 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Laura Brown
Sent from my iPhone
74 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kimberly Walter <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:15 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Mike and Kim Walter
Oceanside Home Owners
--
Blessed Be :)<><
Kimberly Walter
75 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Micah Ramadan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:38 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
76 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Micah Ramadan <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:38 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Micah Ramadan
77 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lois McCollough <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:34 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
78 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: TC L <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:18 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Patricia Louis
79 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Susi Browne <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:34 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Susi Browne
75 Saint Malo Beach
Oceanside, 92054
80 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:36 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
M. Clark Taylor
801-419-2550
[email protected]
81 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Fortunate Son <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:38 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Dirk Ackema
30 Year Oceanside Resident
Sent from my iPad
82 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dan Louis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:50 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Daniel Louis P.E.
83 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Blake Dillion <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:11 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Blake Dillion
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Taylor <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:15 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ann Taylor
8 St Malo Beach
Oceanside, CA
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Linda Lunsford <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:20 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Linda Lunsford
Sent from my iPhone
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Boutin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 6:40 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ann Boutin
4 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Peter Adams <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:06 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Peter Adams
39 St. Malo
Oceanside, Ca 92054
5 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Richard Farley <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:15 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
6 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:23 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Katherine Rouse
Sent from my iPhone
7 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Fortunate Son <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:32 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Jonathan Borrego; Russ Cunningham; Ryan Keim; Hamid Bahadori Subject: Del Mar City Council, Agenda Item #11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Worden, and Del Mar City Council Members, Please consider the following conditions before voting to oppose a sand retention solution in Oceanside.
All of the South Oceanside beaches, two miles of coastline, do not have any dry sand. The wet sand has been eroded to a level just above low tide. Sand from Pier area beaches is being swept into the Harbor or out to sea.
Sand transport along our coast is interrupted by offshore canyons which allow sand to settle at depths that are inaccessible. The Carlsbad Canyon, offshore of Ponto, prevents sand from moving up and down coast. The canyons offshore of La Jolla and Scripps contribute to substantial sand loss from Del Mar beaches.
Groins have helped stabilize beaches at locations around the world. The groins at Newport Beach are a local example of a sustainable solution to save an eroding coastline. Groins could help retain sand in Del Mar before being lost to nearby canyons.
Groins are being considered in Oceanside to complement a sand replenishment program to restore area beaches. Short groins could be built and filled with new sand which would allow sand to cascade up and down the beaches. Previous regional sand replenishment efforts by SANDAG were short lived expensive experiments. Sand retention will encourage more sand replenishment programs and allow all to enjoy area beaches.
Please allow Staff from Oceanside to present an engineered solution to you which will contribute sand to coastal migration.
Best Regards,
Dirk Ackema, Founding Director
Save Oceanside Sand
8 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: April Anstett <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:50 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase.
Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, April Anstett
44 St Malo Beach
Oceanside, CA 92054
9 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mary Anne Stroud <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 7:57 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
MaryAnne & Duke Stroud
10 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lois McCollough <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 8:39 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lois McCollough
Sent from my iPhone
11 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:06 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Susan Shupe
(760) 717-6167
Sent from my iPhone
12 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:38 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Barry Snyder
Sent from my iPhone
13 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lisa Evans <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:13 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lisa G Evans
Sent from my iPhone
14 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tom Evans <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 10:14 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Regards,
Tom
15 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Tom Evans
Sun Pacific Farming
1095 E. Green St. Pasadena, CA 91106
c: 626-233-0121
[email protected]
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. 16 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Richard S <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:05 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Richard Sablan
17 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Katherine Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 12:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Katherine Johnson
26 St. Malo Beach
Oceanside CA 92054
18 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kevin R. McKenzie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 2:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Kevin McKenzie
oceanside resident
----------------------------
[email protected]
310-779-1900
19 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 *** sent remotely ***
please excuse typos
20 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Stephen Watkins <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:26 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Stephen
Stephen Watkins
1 Saint Malo Beach
Oceanside, CA 92054
Cell 626-676-7755
21 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Sent from my iPhone
22 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: John Case <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:56 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John H Case
Oceanside
Sent from my iPhone
23 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Erin McKenzie <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:43 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Erin McKenzie
______________________
Erin McKenzie
[email protected]
24 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Henry <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:02 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Henry Reed
25 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Nick Louis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:33 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Nicolas Louis
26 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dan Fair <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:41 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Dan and Shelley Fair
27 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cindy Vail <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:58 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Cindy Vail
30 St. Malo Beach
Oceanside, CA 92054
28 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tracy Hirrel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:16 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Tracy G. Hirrel
[email protected]
29 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Taro <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:18 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Taro
30 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: taro keystonecomm.com <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:18 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Thank you,
Taro
Keystone Communications and Integration
7605001319
[email protected]
31 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Carrie O'Neal <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:38 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Carrie O'Neal
Carrie O’Neal
Crested Butte,CO.
(970) 901 4040
32 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 [email protected]
http://higherhooves.com
“Centering hearts with the ‘presents’ of a horse”
“God’s great love and purposes for us are worked out in the messes, storms and sins, blue skies, daily work, and dreams of our common lives, working with us as we are and not as we should be.” Eugene H. Peterson
33 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mike Sencer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:40 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of reviewing the entire plan.
Sincerely,
Michael Sencer
901 S. Pacific Street, Unit 204
Oceanside, CA 92054
714-801-2607
34 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Blaine Fetter <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:52 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Blaine P. Fetter
16 St. Malo
Oceanside, CA
Sent from my iPad
35 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Craig Andrews <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:55 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Craig Andrews
36 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Olivia Kazanjian <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:57 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Olivia
Jewelry by Olivia K
37 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jewelrybyoliviak.com%2F&data=04%7 C01%7Ccityclerk%40delmar.ca.us%7C252ec9918a034fe77e2608d9f552c115%7Ce57e47ceaae64f7392493b679aab1eb4 %7C0%7C0%7C637810558971501545%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI 6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=nkhz07%2BKAgmhpl9HXeuYrbFvAyD5fPVIhynbEuYXkxY%3D&r eserved=0
38 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lynda Fetter <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:59 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: The proposed resolution on your Agenda, opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar City Leaders,
Please remove your proposed resolution plan opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan.
Your resolution focuses on a single aspect of Oceanside’s plan (retention). This is out of context and ignores the entire plan. In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information.
We are working with coastal engineering experts and respected scientists who believe that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. By not reviewing this plan carefully, your proposal fails to consider aspects which are even beneficial to Del Mar…
Your acceptance of this agenda item would be perceived as a blatant rush to judgement without the benefit of complete information and collaboration. It will show disregard for the customary process of public review. The public, and all surrounding cities must have the opportunity to comment on this complex, crucial issue.
I, and my colleagues request that you simply remove your resolution from the city Agenda, or deny its approval. As responsible representatives of your community, you should recognize that it’s wise and appropriate to honor inclusive relationships with the entire region.
Sincerely,
Lynda Boone Fetter
39 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: KYLE SAGRAVES <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:04 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Please share the sand!!!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
40 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: AnnCharlotte Chandler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:05 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, <BR> <BR>I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. <BR> <BR>The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. <BR> <BR>Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. <BR> <BR>In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. <BR> <BR>For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your consideration. <BR> <BR>Sincerely, Ann-Charlotte Chandler [email protected] Sent from my iPhone
41 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Wendee Erickson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:35 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Wendee Erickson
42 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Curtis Calvert <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:42 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
43 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Curtis Calvert <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:43 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Curtis Calvert
44 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Margaret Grossman <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 10:26 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Margaret Grossman, Oceanside CA
45 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Maranda <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 10:32 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Maranda Joy Carlton
Born, raised, and still living in Oceanside
46 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Matthew Caulfield <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 10:35 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Matt Caulfield
Sent from my iPhone
47 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ty Louis <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 11:34 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Tynan Louis
48 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dan Munzer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 11:51 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Get Outlook for iOS
49 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dorothy Matthiessen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 12:11 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
John Matthiessen
18 St. Malo Beach
Oceanside
50 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cox Ricky <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 12:41 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ricky Stern
Oceanside, CA
51 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Robert Steele <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 1:31 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Robert Steele MD
52 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Steve Maschue <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 2:41 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez
Subject: Agenda Item 11, Del Mar City Council Meeting Feb 22, 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mayor Worden and Honorable Del Mar City Council.
Please vote against Agenda Item 11 which opposes the use of groins to conserve sand along our North San Diego County Beaches.
I am an Engineer and a retired US Air Force Colonel, and I have worked for years to try to get more sand on our beaches and keep it there. Below is my rationale:
1. Groins are used successfully all over the world to retain sand. Most of the US East coast beaches are protected by groins. Surfers like to surf near groins to get better breaks.
2. Delmar is located so far from Oceanside that any groins in Oceanside would have NO effect on Delmar's beaches
3. Any groins that Oceanside would put in would be fully backfilled so would not have any effect on the neighboring beaches, and because they would be far smaller than the Camp Pendleton Jetty would have insignificant effect even if they did.
4. Sand is lost each year to the offshore Carlsbad Canyon, Scripps Canyon and La Jolla Canyon and is irretrievable. So any time there is sand drift north or south, those canyons capture a percentage of the moving sand. The better we can trap sand, the less is lost to the canyons
5. Sand moves both North and South along our shared littoral cell. It moves North in the summer and south in the winter -- with some weather and current variations. There was no complaint from neighboring cities when Carlsbad built their jetties. Why is Oceanside being singled out?
Thank you!
Steve Maschue
999 N Pacific #D310
Oceanside CA 92054
Phone 760-216-8017
53 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 2:48 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Robert McCollough
Sent from my iPhone
54 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Derick Mitre <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:08 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
-Derick
Sent from my iPhone
55 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Barbara Collins <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:21 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item # 11. Proposed Resolution Opposing Construction of Devices that Could Interfere with Natural Flow of Beach Sand into Del Mar
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor Worden and City Councilmembers,
I am an Oceanside resident writing on behalf of the Sierra Club. Sierra Club supports the proposed resolution opposing the construction of devices that could interfere with natural flow of beach sand into Del Mar.
Sierra Club opposed the action taken by the Oceanside City Council in August 2021 to move forward with planning to install groins at the coast in Oceanside. We believe that our coastal planning must first consider natural or “soft” adaptation tools. Beach nourishment restores sand on beaches that have shrunk and is a widely used soft solution for coastal erosion. It is unfortunately not a permanent solution as winter storms typically shrink beaches again. However, living shorelines and tidal marsh restoration are other natural, soft approaches which have been shown to effectively reduce erosion from happening.
Problems with groins and hard approaches
Groins act like dams to physically stop the movement of sand. They prevent longshore drift from washing sediment down the coast from north to south. As a result, they cause a buildup of sand on the side protected by the structure. But areas further downstream on the coast are cut off from natural longshore drift by these barrier-like structures. No longer replenished by the sand that usually feeds them, these areas experience worsened erosion.
A groin merely transfers erosion from one place to another further down the beach and makes it worse. They are counter-productive.
Groins can also create a rip current that can be a hazard to swimmers. Rip currents can also accelerate erosion.
Groins also don’t eliminate the need for costly beach replenishment.
While there are multiple causes of beach erosion in Oceanside, it is being exacerbated by sea level rise and the increased frequency and severity of storm surges caused by climate change. If natural adaptation tools are implemented and more action is needed to respond to beach erosion and sea level rise, managed or planned retreat should be considered next. Only if both of these approaches prove infeasible should the application of hard-edged structures be considered. In all cases, the best available climate science should be used at all times.
Thank you,
Barbara Collins,
Sierra Club North County Coastal Group Executive Committee Member 768 Puerto Oro Ct., Oceanside, CA 92057
56 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mark McGilvray <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:23 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mark and Jean McGilvray
57 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: thepentons <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:59 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
Follow the customary process of Public Review! Wait to see the design first before halting the Oceanside San Replenishment plan! Please remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda the proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment.
Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Hugh V. Penton, Jr.
58 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Elaine Maschue <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:06 PM
To: Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden Cc: [email protected]
Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda Item #11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Del Mar City Council,
I am a retired dental hygienist and I live in a small condo on the beach in Oceanside. I have watched the sand on our beach disappear. I ask you to vote no on the proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
--
Elaine Maschue
999 N Pacific #D310
Oceanside CA 92054
Mobile/Text 760-845-0105
59 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 60 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: thepentons <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:09 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
Please remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda the proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment.
Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which would be beneficial to Del Mar.
Educate: See what the design says first; ask questions; see if there are advantages for you, see if it works; rather than shutting down any dialog before the study is even presented.
Please remove the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan from Tuesday’s City Council Meeting agenda. Instead, notify the Del Mar Council to be aware and learn what the plan is and if it could BENEFIT Del Mar, in any way. If not, THEN you can vote it down.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mary Anne Penton
61 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Steve Maschue <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:11 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Dwight Worden
Subject: Agenda Item 11, Del Mar City Council Meeting Feb 22, 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mayor Worden and Honorable Del Mar City Council.
Please vote against Agenda Item 11 which opposes the use of groins to conserve sand along our North San Diego County Beaches.
I am an Engineer and a retired US Air Force Colonel, and I have worked for years to try to get more sand on our beaches and keep it there. Below is my rationale:
1. Groins are used successfully all over the world to retain sand. Most of the US East coast beaches are protected by groins. Surfers like to surf near groins to get better breaks.
2. Delmar is located so far from Oceanside that any groins in Oceanside would have NO effect on Delmar's beaches
3. Any groins that Oceanside would put in would be fully backfilled so would not have any effect on the neighboring beaches, and because they would be far smaller than the Camp Pendleton Jetty would have an insignificant effect even if they did.
4. Sand is lost each year to the offshore Carlsbad Canyon, Scripps Canyon and La Jolla Canyon and is irretrievable. So any time there is sand-drift north or south, those canyons capture a percentage of the moving sand. The better we can trap sand, the less is lost to the canyons
5. Sand moves both North and South along our shared littoral cell. It moves North in the summer and south in the winter -- with some weather and current variations. There was no complaint from neighboring cities when Carlsbad built their jetties. Why is Oceanside being singled out?
Thank you!
Steve Maschue
999 N Pacific #D310
Oceanside CA 92054
Phone 760-216-8017
62 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kristen Heard <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:34 PM
To: Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Kristen Heard
Subject: Re: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello, I just realized I accidentally sent this from my work email. Sorry! I meant to send from my personal email, copied above. I just wanted to follow up to make sure it was clear I’m not representing NCI with the email below.
Thanks,
Kristen Heard (she/her/ella)
Director of Marketing and Communications
Nature and Culture International
p: +1 858-259-0374
w: www.natureandculture.org
e: [email protected]
a: 1400 Maiden Lane, Del Mar, CA 92014
Sign up for our e-news for a dose of conservation inspiration straight to your inbox! From: Kristen Heard <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, February 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] 63 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, <BR> <BR>I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. <BR> <BR>The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. <BR> <BR>Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. <BR> <BR>In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. <BR> <BR>For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your consideration. <BR> <BR>Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
64 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Amy Ashton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:01 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I am writing to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. PLEASE note: we are all living on the same coast and everything we do should be for ALL the people living here in San Diego County.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Amy Ashton
65 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Roscoe Perkett <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:02 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Regards,
Roscoe Perkett
66 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Leigh McGilvray <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:08 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Leigh McGilvray
67 February 22, 2022 Item 11
Major General Matthew P. Caulfield USMC (Ret)
2023 South Pacific Street
Oceanside, CA 92054
February 21, 2022
Mayor Worden, Members of the Del Mar City Council
What is this rush to judgement all about? Your resolution opposing Oceanside’s sand replenishment and retention plan parrots the same kind of resolution raised by the Carlsbad City Council last month, including “putting the final nail in the coffin” by gratutiously notifying the Coastal Commission and SANDAG of your opposition.
What are you opposing? The Oceanside plan has not been finalized. The design, permitting and outreach phase of the plan, which requires coordinating with Del Mar among other stakeholders has not begun. In fact, the contract itself has not been signed.
Why disregard normal review procedures? The plan mandates review and comment by Delmar. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated that the plan will not be approved if it impacts unfavorably on neighboring cities. Not to take those assurances in good faith reflect unfavorably on the professional and collaborative relationships that ought to exist between neighbors. Rather than engaging in a premature, knee-jerk” opposition, we should be focused on moving forward with a spirit of partnership and mutual trust to solve an issue of utmost concern to the residents of both cities.
At this stage prudent government would conduct a careful review of plan as it progresses toward finalization. It is likely that Oceanside’s plan will include new and updated adaptation technology and science with direct application to Del Mar. Not to take advantage of such information, which is provided at no cost to Del Mar doesn’t make sense.
Oceanside has committed significant resources to develop a plan, which addresses a major problem of beach erosion. A plan that could have benefits to neighboring cities as well as to the state and nation. It is among a pitiful few cities to do so. Oceanside deserves encouragement and support, and by the way, emulation, not carping criticism.
I urge you to disapprove the resolution.
Respectfully,
Matthew P. Caulfield
68 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: NICK RICCI <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 6:22 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Nick C. Ricci
Sent from my iPad
69 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lynn Abaté-Johnson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 7:57 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: PLEASE Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process.
The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase.
Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar.
More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information.
To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lynn Abaté-Johnson
70 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Global Business Consultant | Community Director
Oceanside Resident
71 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Diane Kovacic <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:04 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Diane Kovacic
999 N. Pacific unit D307 Oceanside California
Cell 951 5155417
72 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Sent from my iPhone
73 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Carolyn Krammer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:22 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item # 11 Proposed Resolution Opposing Construction of Devices that Could Interfere with Natural Flow of Beach Sand into Del Mar
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Worden and City Councilmembers:
The Citizens for the Preservation of Parks & Beaches (CPPB) supports your proposed recommendation to adopt a resolution for the City of Del Mar to oppose the Oceanside Beach Sand Retention project that would block the transport of sand to our cities to the south. Even in our own city of Oceanside, residents to the south of these proposed groins do not want their beaches to be degraded any more than they already have been. All of our San Diego beaches are suffering from our past practices of armoring our coastline. We are all experiencing the unintended consequences of hard structures that have been placed on our beaches in the past. We do not need to continue this practice of Unintended Consequence. Just as is happening in other coastal cities, coastal armoring has caused the eradication of our sandy beaches. This is a regional issue not just an Oceanside issue. Unfortunately, the Oceanside Council 4-1 has voted to approve this project going forward without any input from our neighbors to the south. Our southerly neighbors will definitely experience the devastating results of this project in the future. It may take years, but it will happen just like we are now learning and experiencing what those unintended consequences are from our harbor jetties and coastal armoring. The CPPB respectfully and strongly request that you approve the proposed Resolution and work on a regional solution to a regional issue. Thank You for your consideration and your support of the Resolution.
Carolyn Krammer, Oceanside Resident
Chairperson
Citizens for the Preservation of Parks & Beaches
Oceanside 92054
74 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kara Walker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:26 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Kara Walker
Sent from my iPhone
75 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mary O'Connell <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 3:35 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mary Adams O’Connell
Sent from my iPhone
76 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: La Donna Palega <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 6:24 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
La Donna Palega
Oceanside Resident of past 21 Years
Sent from my iPhone
77 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Lynn Macneil <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:00 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Lynn M. Macneil
78 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Aileen Adams <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:50 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Aileen Adams
79 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: tamara ricci <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:51 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Tamara Ricci
80 February 22, 2022 Item 11
2 Sent from my iPhone
81 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Alyce Werdel <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 5:44 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Alyce Werdel
82 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Colton A Dillion <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2022 11:45 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase.
Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information.
To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment.
Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Colton Dillion
83 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Deanna Lorson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:21 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Ashley Jones; Jonathan Borrego; Hamid Bahadori
Subject: Agenda item 11
Attachments: Del Mar Agenda Item 11 re Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention Pilot Project.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Worden and Del Mar Councilmembers,
Please see attached letter outlining Oceanside’s commitment to work with the City of Del Mar as a key stakeholder as Oceanside moves forward on a sand nourishment and retention pilot program.
Thank you for your consideration.
Deanna
Deanna Lorson
City Manager
City of Oceanside
300 North Coast Highway
Oceanside, CA 92054
760-435-3065
[email protected]
84 February 22, 2022 Item 11
85 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Fortunate Son <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:25 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Del Mar City Council Agenda Item #11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Worden, and Del Mar City Council Members, Please consider the following conditions before voting to oppose a sand retention solution in Oceanside.
All of the South Oceanside beaches, two miles of coastline, do not have any dry sand. The wet sand has been eroded to a level just above low tide. Sand from Pier area beaches is being swept into the Harbor or out to sea.
Sand transport along our coast is interrupted by offshore canyons which allow sand to settle at depths that are inaccessible. The Carlsbad Canyon, offshore of Ponto, prevents sand from moving up and down coast. The canyons offshore of La Jolla and Scripps contribute to substantial sand loss from Del Mar beaches.
Groins have helped stabilize beaches at locations around the world. The groins at Newport Beach are a local example of a sustainable solution to save an eroding coastline. Groins could help retain sand in Del Mar before being lost to nearby canyons.
Groins are being considered in Oceanside to complement a sand replenishment program to restore area beaches. Short groins could be built and filled with new sand which would allow sand to cascade up and down the beaches. Previous regional sand replenishment efforts by SANDAG were short lived expensive experiments. Sand retention will encourage more sand replenishment programs and allow all to enjoy area beaches.
Please allow Staff from Oceanside to present an engineered solution to you which will contribute sand to coastal migration.
Best Regards,
Dirk Ackema, Founding Director
Save Oceanside Sand
86 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: James Young <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:25 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del James Young
Sent from my iPhone:
714-357-0355
87 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Julie Press <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:37 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review.
Julie Press
Oceanside Homeowner
Ovard Condo
88 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Robert Foster <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:49 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of% Sincerely, The Foster’s 1601 S Pacific Oceanside Ca.
89 February 22, 2022 Item 11
February 2, 2222
Del Mar City Council
Re: February 22, 2022 Agenda Item #11: Proposed Resolution Opposing Construction of Devices that Could Interfere with Natural Flow of Beach Sand into Del Mar I wholeheartedly support the resolution to oppose construction of devices which will interfere with the natural flow of beach sand to Del Mar.
In a 4-1 vote (Mayor dissenting), the Oceanside City Council majority voted to support a pilot program which would place two groins on Oceanside’s beaches on The Strand and extend the harbor jetty. In addition, as part of the plan, at building out, would be a groin field consisting of 12 groins on Oceanside’s beaches without any regard or discussion with our neighbors to the south. Please see the Recommendation from Staff and subsequent approval 8/11/21. This shows you how little the council majority cares about our neighbors to the south. Does the following recommendation look like engaging your city or any other coastal neighbor to the south?
Additionally, the following graphic depicts what Oceanside would look like after “buildout”. 1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
The intent of the study which many supported was to look at “new ways” to put sand on Oceanside’s beaches and methods to retain the sand which would be “environmentally” acceptable and easily approved by the Coastal Commission. Well, as you can see, that didn’t happen. All other methods were thrown to the wayside by the majority of the council to implement a groin field instead. When the results of the study where shared in the South Oceanside neighborhood, discussing the placement of a groin at Wisconsin St., many residents were very upset with the idea as they knew, the placement would all but eliminate all stand to our already starved South Oceanside Beaches (South O beaches).
To add, since the beginning of the study, we have asked repeatedly that the council discuss ANY ideas that would impact sand flow to the south be discussed regionally as history has shown that groin fields do nothing except stop sand movement south as you can see from this photo taken in July of 2020. Our beaches remain stripped as our Public Works Director let our SCOPE Permit expire!
Thank you for hearing this item. I urge you to support the item and hope for a regional approach to sand loss in San Diego County.
Sincerely,
Shari Mackin
Former Deputy Mayor, City of Oceanside
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: PATRICIA MARTIN <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:36 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Sent from my iPad
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cheryl Zavalani <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:13 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Thank you for your consideration,
Rudy & Cheryl Zavalani
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: PATRICIA MARTIN <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:37 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Sent from my iPad
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ryan Keim <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:49 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item #11 Del Mar Opposition to Groins
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Worden and Councilmembers:
The city of Oceanside has been battling sand replenishment issues since the Del Mar boat basin was initially constructed in the 1940’s. The boat basin, combined with shoreline revetments, other hard structures and the damming of rivers has starved many beaches in our County of sand. After decades of neglect and inaction from the federal government, our City took the first crucial step to fund a pilot project, hire a consultant and identify potential solutions. Our hope and goal from any proposed solution is to increase sand to all of our County beaches and lead the effort to preserve our cherished coastline.
Until recently, regional sand-replenishment projects through SANDAG and annual harbor dredging had managed to keep just enough sand on Oceanside’s beaches to make them usable and protect our roadways and other infrastructure from catastrophic damage. Unfortunately, these efforts that consisted solely of sand replenishment have proven insufficient and unaffordable. We no longer have dry sand on the majority of our beaches (at high and low tides) and we are at risk of losing our most valuable natural resource and putting the future of our City in jeopardy.
The long-term failure of an inconsistent strategy based solely on replenishment forced our City to explore new and sustainable options.
Sand-retention devices, in conjunction with a robust bypass system, were identified in the initial phase of our project as a part of two-pronged approach for a permanent solution. While hard structures have created our current crisis, at this point it is not realistic or economically feasible to remove harbors, coastal revetments, roads, railways or the obstructions in the rivers of Southern California. We have to engineer a solution to mitigate their continued existence. During our next phase of the project, we look forward to collaborating with city of Del Mar in the design of a properly engineered and constructed bypass/retention system that will increase net sand flow to all beaches south of the Oceanside Harbor.
While the city of Oceanside took the first step to restore our beaches, we hope to take the next and most important steps in partnership with Del Mar and our other coastal neighbors. Until now, cities throughout our County have gone forward individually with temporary solutions to restore sand. A problem this complex and expansive requires our conjoined efforts and this project has the potential to spark true regional collaboration. Please join the city of Oceanside in creating a long-lasting regional solution that will save our beaches for generations to come.
Respectfully,
Ryan Keim
Deputy Mayor
City of Oceanside
4 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Barbara Engleson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:55 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPad
5 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Eugenie Schlueter <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:01 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Eugenie Schlueter
6 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:10 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Sent from my iPhone
7 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Phillip Schneider <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:16 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Russ Cuningham; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
Please note that Groins already exist in Carlsbad and proper planning and sand fill will minimize the impact of downstream sand flow.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Phillip Schneider
[email protected]
1800 Block S. Pacific St
Oceanside, CA 92054
8 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jim Jaffee <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:20 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Support of Agenda Item 11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I support, in the strongest possible terms, the submission of a letter in opposition to groins in Oceanside. It is well known that the Harbor Jetties at Del Mar Boat Basin impede sand flow south to Del Mar. Bypassing sand around this impediment is required to restore littoral flow to the extent possible. Adding more impediments such as the proposed groins will only compound an already difficult situation.
Resources and studies funding groins are better spent on bypassing already impeded sand at Del Mar Jetty around the impediment caused by the jetty, Transporting impeded sand in the feeder streams and rivers within the Oceanside Littoral Cell are also more sustainable approaches.
Iin closing, I support the resolution. In addition, I would suggest along with opposing the groins, language be added to the resolution that Oceanside instead pursue more sustainable solutions including sand bypassing around Oceanside Harbor Jetties as well as increasing the flow of impounded upstream sand from rivers and streams in the Oceanside Littoral Cell.
Regards,
Jim Jaffee
Co-Lead Beach Preservation Committee,
San Diego County Chapter, Surfrider Foundation
9 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 11:27 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Aaron Maxwell
10 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: joy cook <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 2:34 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
We Approve the Prosed Resolution.............Oceanside deserves to have and maintain a beach like All beaches in California,
Newport Beach is a good example ... of how installing a few Growens can save your sand.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Joy Cook
901 S. Pacific St.
Unit 302
Oceanside, Ca. 92054
951-232-8341
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Alyce Williamson <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 2:45 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Henry Williamson'
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Alyce Williamson
2 St. Malo Beach
Oceanside, CA 92054
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Erin Cunningham <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 3:51 PM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Thank you,
Erin Cunningham
--
Erin Cunningham
Licensed Esthetician, Massage Therapist, HHP,
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: molly Ashton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:17 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: anthony howard <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 6:08 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Anthony Howard
Sent from my iPhone
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Loren Wolverton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:35 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Also Del Mar hasn’t been cool since the 80’s.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Loren Wolverton
Sent from my iPhone
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Julia Fry <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 8:16 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, <BR> <BR>I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. <BR> <BR>The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. <BR> <BR>Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. <BR> <BR>In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. <BR> <BR>For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your consideration. <BR> <BR>Sincerely, Julia Fry
Sent from my iPhone
4 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Emma Ashton <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:32 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Emma Ashton
Sent from my iPhone
5 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Marnie Bodek <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:43 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Marnie Bodek and Ed Moss
49 St. Malo Beach
Oceanside. CA
6 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Mike Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:51 AM
To: City Manager Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Dan Quirk; Dwight Worden; Public Works Mail Box; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del 7 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Arlene McGee <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:37 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del 8 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Emelyne Sablan <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 8:43 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Emelyne Sablan
9 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Cranking with Caden <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 12:16 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
10 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: james dean <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 2:05 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders, <BR> <BR>I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan. <BR> <BR>The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar. <BR> <BR>Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities. <BR> <BR>In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities. <BR> <BR>For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your consideration. <BR> <BR>Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
11 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ivan Ramirez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:21 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sent from my iPhone
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Analia Loevenguth <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 10:23 AM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
2 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Carmelo Gutierrez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 12:32 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, Carmelo Gutierrez
3 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: John Brinsley <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 2:14 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Sent from Mail for Windows
John Brinsley
No.41, St. Malo Beach
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tess Clair <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 3:37 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Tess Clair
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Burke Louis <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 4:09 PM
To: Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; City Manager Mail Box; Public Works Mail Box; City Clerk Mail Box Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Remove the Del Mar City Council agenda proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Leaders,
I write to ask you to remove from the Del Mar City Council agenda a proposed resolution opposing the Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan.
The proposed resolution not only formally opposes Oceanside’s plan before the plan has been finalized but also does so without a customary review process. The Oceanside Sand Replenishment and Retention plan has not even entered the design phase. Finalization of the plan requires coordination with regional cities, including Del Mar. More importantly, the proposed resolution focuses on a single aspect of the plan (retention) out of context of the entire plan (replenishment). In doing so, you are acting with incomplete and potentially erroneous information. To cite one example, coastal engineering experts and respected coastal scientists have stated that a retention system can be designed to mitigate down-drift shoreline impact. In any event, by not reviewing the plan in its entirety, the proposal fails to consider aspects of the plan which are beneficial to Del Mar.
Del Mar’s proposed resolution disregards the customary process of public review in which Del Mar and other cities are provided an opportunity to comment. Oceanside officials have repeatedly stated on the record that its Sand Replenishment and Retention Plan would not be approved if it has a deleterious impact on neighboring downdrift cities.
In summary, the proposed resolution appears to be a rush-to judgment without the benefit of complete information as well as an abrogation of the professional norms and courteous staff coordination that is expected to characterize relationships between sister-cities.
For these reasons, I request that you remove the proposed resolution from the city agenda or deny its approval.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Zoe Louis
1 February 22, 2022 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Deborah Lyons <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2022 5:27 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: ⬤ item #12 Proposed Resolution Reaffirming the City’s Position on the Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel at SONGS
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor Worden and Del Mar City Council Members:
We are writing in support of this important resolution that reiterates the importance of identifying a safe storage site for the spent nuclear fuel at SONGS. If no permanent site is timely identified, once this waste has been placed in proper permanent containers it should be moved to a temporary site that is away from populated areas.
Please vote in support of this resolution.
Sincerely,
Deborah Lyons and Marjorie Zarling
410 9th St, Del Mar, CA 92014
--
Deborah Lyons
1 February 22, 2022 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: cathy iwane <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 3:08 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk
Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda 2/22 Item #12 Resolution: SONGS Nuclear Waste Handling
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Council,
Thank you for your tireless work to bring this resolution to your meeting agenda. I appreciate the time that many of you have taken to meet and correspond with me about this resolution.
Know that your tenacity and attention to detail represents the concerns of countless individuals who have been witness to unfulfilled promises by the DOE for permanent waste storage,
errors on the part of our utility and repeated exemptions by our Federal regulator, the NRC. Since our state regulators have little jurisdiction to effect change, I applaud my city for
consistently representing me and my family by virtue of your numerous resolutions to date. In doing so, you continue to inform a weary public feeling voiceless during the pandemic.
That we, the ratepayers, have funded Edison's Decommissioning of SONGS begs the question, "Why must we fight tooth and nail for transparency on public safety?" Having evacuated my family from Japan in 2012 due to the Fukushima meltdowns, I know what it's like to witness a much too cozy relationship between the utility in Japan (TEPCO) and
their Federal nuclear regulator. The Fukushima triple nuclear meltdowns were not the result of technical mishap. They were caused by a lack of safety culture and by human error.
Experiencing the earthquake, tsunamis and meltdowns of March 11, 2011 in real-time, has forever changed the trajectory of my life, not to mention that of my Japanese husband and our children.
My hope is that such a tragedy will never visit our beautiful coastline at SONGS. I've promised my girls that I'd do everything in my power to promote public safety, lest our family stories be told in vain.
My hat is off to all of you. Please vote 'Yes' on our item #12 SONGS Resolution. I look forward to seeing you all at this Tuesday's City Council meeting.
Respectfully,
Cathy Iwane, on behalf of Shige, Kayla and Alyssa Iwane Pine Needles Drive, Del Mar
2 February 22, 2022 Item 12
2 Coalition for Nuclear Safety, co-founder
Samuel Lawrence Foundation, board member
831-915-3754
3 February 22, 2022 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Charles Ziegler <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 4:53 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk
Subject: SONGS RESOLUTION
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Ms. Martinez, Del Mar city Council,
As a board member of the Samuel Lawrence Foundation, I am acutely aware of problematic storage of nuclear waste on the beach in southern California. We could talk forever about how we ended up with our policy of waste disposal but the reality and the consequence is now here on the beach. I (along with all future generations) am so appreciative of the council and your position as Deputy Mayor that you set time to listen to the community regarding these storage (safety) issues. The responsibility we all have for our coastline and preserving the natural world will be defining as we progress into this century.
Thank you very much..
Sincerely, Charles Ziegler
--
Charles Ziegler
Mill Valley, Ca 94941
cell : (415) 342-0752
4 February 22, 2022 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Bart Ziegler <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 2:20 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk
Subject: Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda 2/22 Item #12 Resolution: SONGS Nuclear Waste Handling
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar City Council,
Thank you for your Council’s concern with the San Onofre nuclear waste, an existential threat to all southern California for generations to come. It is the largest nuclear waste dump in the entire nation, and there are immanent risks, both human and natural, flooding, bluff erosion, and more.
Only 33 miles north of Del Mar this San Onofre site is a disaster waiting to happen.
Thin-walled steel storage cans hold tons of deadly spent nuclear fuel. The canisters are already gouged in the loading process, and stored in a corrosive, seaside marine environment. The canisters have a 25 year warranty and are certainly no long term solution for a pollution that is deadly for 250,000 years.
Southern California Edison’s waste must be stored safely, and disposed of correctly, in order to keep the coastline functional, real estate protected, and our community safe.
Thank you for supporting this resolution. Hopefully Del Mar can share this resolution with other sister coastal communities and communities downwind. Thank you for your pubic service.
Bart Ziegler PhD, President
The Samuel Lawrence Foundation
5 February 22, 2022 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Paul McEneany <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 10:23 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dwight Worden; Tracy Martinez; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk
Subject: City Council Meeting Agenda 2/22 Item #12 Resolution: SONGS Nuclear Waste Handling
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please vote 'Yes' on our item #12 SONGS Resolution.
Based on having read several SONG Nuclear Waste Resolutions approved by other public agencies and participated in the Coalition for Nuclear Safety meetings, digesting multiple emails and research articles on the risks and challenges presented by the Nuclear waste at SONG, I find the subject RESOLUTION to be the BEST. I applaud those who participated in its preparation and the Del Mar City Council for its leadership in addressing this critical public safety issue.
The 18 WHEREAS clauses are factual, well articulated, comprehensive, and represent current knowledge of risk and science. Each of the 6 RESOLVED sections is realistic, required and actionable I encourage the City Council to continue its leadership and adopt resolution Thank you,
Paul McEneany
CNS Member
[email protected]
858-442-6057
1 February 22, 2022 Item 12