Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda
Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California
February 5, 2024, 2024 City Council Meeting
INFORMATION RECEIVED
AFTER THE COUNCIL AGENDA
WAS DISTRIBUTED
(“Red Dots”)
1 Melinda Gould
From: Monica Meredith <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024 6:15 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: red dot for Feb 5 city council re Agenda Item 2 LOSSAN PRESENTATION Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Del Mar Representatives:
I believe it is time for Del Mar to take a stand and promote a safer, more sensible route for the train, and make it known to those working on the LOSSAN corridor that piecing together train tracks city by city is not an intelligent way to go about it. Given the latest incident in San Clemente, it is clear that Southern CA needs a clear, cohesive PLAN to get trains onto safe tracks in safe places.
That plan should include not tearing up cities and residential neighborhoods for approximately a decade, not putting businesses at risk of bankruptcy, not displacing people out of their homes, not running freight trains that carry military and hazardous materials under people's homes, not exposing people to pollution, noise and vibration now that the tracks need moving. They were laid at a time when the world was a different place then it is today, and in moving them, let's be smart and have a plan that makes sense and respects people and the environment together!
PLEASE support the people who elected you to support them. You all know that Del Mar residents and property owners, as well as the businesses in Del Mar, believe a route through residential Del Mar, destroying homes is ludicrous. We need a PLAN for a freight train that doesn't disrupt anyone's city. This plan would be injudicious and irresponsible anywhere. You know how Del Mar feels. I don't recall being at any meeting at any time where someone got up and promoted the current tunnel plan.
It is NOW time to stand up to SANDAG and insist that there be another feasible route. Solana Beach has done an excellent job of putting their council members on committees in efforts to protect their town. I believe you all can do the same. This is by far the biggest issue that Del Mar will ever face. If this tunnel is built in our neighborhood, this city will be forever changed for the worse.
Support your people, city council! Join hands and fight for your city. It's the right thing to do.
Monica and Dean Meredith
--
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dixie Welsh <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2024 2:52 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Response SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realign Item #5
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear SANDAG/Del Mar City Council,
A tunnel under the Fairgrounds is the best & most logical rail realignment. It is the most direct path to I-5, our Transportation Corridor. It will eliminate the need to replace the trestle bridge, thus saving $53.9 million for better use. It facilitates the passenger platform, so desired by 22nd AG members.
I strongly oppose any tunnel under Camino Del Mar or under Crest Canyon.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Mary D. Welsh
155 15th St #26
Del Mar, CA 92014
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Mark Handzel
100 12th Street
1. Reconsider whether the present tracks still make sense, look to the future a. Current rail path was chosen 100 years ago and lasted the planned 100 years. i. View the current tracks as a sunk cost.
ii. Do not put more good money after bad.
b. Where would you put the tracks today if there were no current tracks?
2. SANDAG should be focused on creating a rail vision for the next 100 years a. Invest in new high-speed rail corridor – Escondido to Miramar. b. Invest now before the corridor becomes even more developed. c. BSNF currently has a spur from Oceanside to Escondido for freight. i. Connect this BSNF spur to this new rail corridor as a transition
1. BSNF currently runs only 2 freight trains in each direction each day.
2. Eight is the maximum number of planned BSNF freight trains in each direction per day.
3. Freight by train is minimal <1% of freight in and out of San Diego. d. Viable transition for AMTRAK until track is completed to LA. e. The military could use this transition line if they need it.
3. Reinvent current tracks for new uses
a. Consider extending the Trolley Blue line from University City to Oceanside i. Potentially make Oceanside a major north county hub – Sprinter, Trolley and Metrolink
b. Consider a trail for pedestrians and bikes, such as electric bike trail for commuters Planned Route for High-Speed Rail
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Sam Clark <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 10:05 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Donna Clark
Subject: SANDAG and Tunnel Projects
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To whom it may concern:
My wife and I are homeowners at 620 Amphitheatre, Del Mar, CA 92014. Please engage in having engineering studies for the train tunnel projects done in order to properly satisfy your fiduciary duties. It is our belief by not doing so then you will have acted in a grossly negligent manner. We are prepared to bring appropriate legal remedies to prove it.
We believe:
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any
homes
2. No eminent domain of private
property
3. No freight trains under people’s
homes (no danger of toxic or chemical
spills, or nuclear ammunitions in
tunnels under our beds or the house
next door).
We are demanding from SANDAG an
Engineering Design that achieves those
three objectives. Make sure the
Environmental Tunnel under
Fairgrounds/Lagoon Alignment to I-5 is
included in the EIS study.
OUR PRIORITIES:
1. TRAIN OFF THE BLUFFS
2. SLOPE LESS THAN 2% GRADE (for
freight)
3. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE (two
lagoons will be saved)
4. NO IMPACT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY
(NOISE, VIBRATION, SINK HOLES, AIR
POLLUTION)
5. NO DIGGING UNDER HOMES
6. NO FREIGHT TRAINS UNDER
PEOPLE’S HOMES
3 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 7. SPEED DOES NOT NEED TO BE
110MPH
Sam W. Clark, IV
SAMCAM, LLC
5924 Norway Road
Dallas, Texas 75230
M: 214.729.6169
[email protected]
4 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project
Attachments: boyle-options-5-feb-2024.pdf; boyle-options-5-feb-2024.pptx From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 4:17 PM
To: Tracy Martinez <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk Mail Box <[email protected]>
Subject: SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Councilmember Martinez – I am a local citizen with a background (and no financial interest) in transportation technology. I will be attending Monday’s Council meeting about SANDAG’s LOSSAN Corridor Rail Realignment Project. I would like to speak concerning the project and have several (x3) visual aids (“power points”) that I believe would assist the discussion. The 3 visual aids are enclosed, I will give you a telephone call to confirm and am copying the City Clerk with this message. It would be helpful if you or staff will confirm your receipt of the images and that they will be available for use during the public discussion. Thank both you and staff for your service and for your work to help address our transportation needs! Kind regards, Mike Boyle
5 February 5, 2024 Item 02
6 February 5, 2024 Item 02
7 February 5, 2024 Item 02
8 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z
The Safer,
Environmental
Alignment Del Mar
Residents Want
The “Environmental I-5 Tunnel
Lagoon Alignment” Option
Coalition to Save
Del Mar
Feb 5th, 2024
Del Mar City Council
9 February 5, 2024
Meeting
Item 02
Who we are, and What is at Stake? z
Coalition to Save Del Mar
- Group of 3,000 Del Mar Residents
- More than 2M visitors per year come to Del Mar
- Beaches, shopping, dining, hotels, hiking & scenic views - Del Mar Races, concerts, fair ($3M per year tax revenue will be lost) - Millions in tax revenue from visitors will be lost for the City and State - SANDAG cannot demolish the northern access of Del Mar at CDM and Jimmy Durante taking 8-10 acres of land and homes by eminent domain for a decade of construction and demolition to build a Cut & Cover tunnel and Portal - When CDM and Jimmy Durante is rebuilt it will be 70 to 1– feet higher, blocking views of homes 10 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z What’s at Stake?
▪ I am here to express concerns about any SANDAG Tunnel Options under Del Mar and its potential environmental, safety, and health impacts
▪ We know the tracks have to come off the bluffs
▪ Improved public transport and regional rail service to move freight are important, but not at the cost of destroying Del Mar when there is a better environmental option ▪ The negative impact of this project on the community will devastate homes, businesses, health and livability of residents for decades
11 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z Passenger and Freight Rail
▪ Although this project is proposed as a means of improving passenger rail and freight service, we know ridership has decreased, population in SD is decreasing (has declined for past 3 years), and passenger rail service doesn’t make money, it is subsidized across the country ▪ SANDAG has conveyed they plan to increase passenger trains from 44 to 78 per day ▪ SANDAG has conveyed they plan to increase freight trains from 6 to 22 per day ▪ The South West Transportation Corridor is not the second busiest rail service in the Nation, even though it is being stated
12 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z
The Environmental I-5 Tunnel Lagoon Alignment
Safer Option for All
▪ Start in the Solana Beach Trench, south of the SB Train Station, construct the Portal, cover trench with a park/green space, Pickle Ball courts on top ▪ Excavate, double track while keeping a rail line in service, in the trench ▪ We know you have enough space to accommodate a 2% grade (for freight) to be underground in a tunnel by the time you hit Via de la Valle
▪ We know you can build a coffer dam and construct the underground Event Platform at the Fairgrounds
▪ Tunnel under “State” owned Fairgrounds land instead of taking people’s homes ▪ We know you can curve the train UNDER THE FAIRGROUNDS AND LAGOON to the I-5 corridor to link up with the Pump Station 65 Portal at the southern end of town, as you have tighter curves in Orange and LA Counties
13 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z
Excavating Solana Beach Trench,
Double Track
14 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z Keep Rail Service Operational
15 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z Completed Full Double Track Service
16 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z Some Facts
▪ Why is SANDAG mandating
110mph speed in the tunnel
under our homes?
▪ The new tracks in Orange
and LA Counties up to
Union Station there are
multiple 90 degree curves
and speeds ranging from 35
mph
▪ Our Engineers have
confirmed you can build an
Event Platform and tunnel
under the Fairgrounds, and
Lagoon basin with no
environmental impact
17 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z
The Environmental Tunnel Underneath the
Lagoon to I-5 must be studied in 2024 Why?
- No Eminent Domain (no law suits, no delays in construction, no higher costs) - No destruction to the north end of town (Jimmy Durante & CDM) - No lost Sales & TOT tax revenue (from fairgrounds, businesses, hotels, shops) - No lost property tax revenue (as no homes will be demolished) - Northern access to town won’t be destroyed (keep the Emergency route open) - We get the railroad out of 2 lagoons, no bridge in San Dieguito River (Use $53M funding towards this project)
- No impact to Fairgrounds business, or environmental impact to lagoons - No risk of toxic chemicals/waste, ammunition, derailments or fires in tunnels under homes - No noise or exhaust pollution, no vibration, cracked slabs, no ventilation fans running 24 hours a day at each portal near resident’s homes
18 February 5, 2024 Item 02
z
Feasible Option to Include in 2024 Study
▪ There Are Pros And Cons for All Options Which Must Be Considered ▪ With the $300M SANDAG received to examine options, it is common sense to include our option:
▪ No Tunnels under homes in Del Mar and NO Eminent Domain ▪ No freight trains under resident’s homes
▪ The tunnel could run along the I-5 Corridor east of the Penasquitos Lagoon ▪ Tunnel could be under commercial buildings along the east side of the I-5 Transportation Corridor instead of under homes (needs to be examined)
▪ No maintenance for SANDAG in 2 lagoons
▪ This common sense option needs to be included so a cost benefit analysis can be done along with other options
▪ This is beneficial for all of Del Mar and Stakeholders 19 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kimberly Jackson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 10:09 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Agenda Item 2 - SANDAG Rail Alignment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no
danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear
ammunitions in tunnels under our beds or the
house next door like what happened in the
Columbia Gorge).
4. No Train under the canyon ANYWHERE.
5. MOVE THE TRAIN TO ABOVE OR UNDER
THE 5 FREEWAY!!!!!
Kimberly Jackson
FOUNDER
Vacation Rental Management
(503) 957-9354
[email protected]
www.vacationrentalsbykimberly.com
20 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Steve Reich <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 10:55 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: February 5, 2024 City Council Meeting Rail Alignment - Red Dot CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
HiPlease record this message against the alignment of the rail line currently on the Del Mar bluffs to one that is a tunnel beneath Del Mar.
The city is too small to lose houses to eminent domain at the tunnel openings.
Del Mar residents should not have to put up with the vibraon and dangers of tunnelling under their homes. They should not have to worry about vibraons, toxic fumes and cargo, and potenal tunnel failures.
I am full support of the following, which has been circulated widely:
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear ammunions in tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
We are demanding from SANDAG an Engineering Design that achieves those three objecves. Make sure the Environmental Tunnel under Fairgrounds/Lagoon Alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study.
OUR PRIORITIES:
1. TRAIN OFF THE BLUFFS
2. SLOPE LESS THAN 2% GRADE (for freight)
3. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE (two lagoons will be saved)
4. NO IMPACT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY (NOISE, VIBRATION, SINK HOLES, AIR POLLUTION)
5. NO DIGGING UNDER HOMES
6. NO FREIGHT TRAINS UNDER PEOPLE’S HOMES
7. SPEED DOES NOT NEED TO BE 110MPH (there are many 90 degree turns and low speeds on the NEW rail lines in Orange and LA county)
Steve Reich
202 Stratford Park Circle
Del Mar, CA 92014
Mobile: (858) 204-6321
[email protected]
21 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Susan Miller <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 11:36 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Agenda Item 2 -- SANDAG Rail Alignment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
SANDAG MUST PRIORITIZE HEALTH & SAFETY of Del Mar Residents and preservation of Del Mar ABOVE shaving off a minute or two of travel time between San Diego and LA.
No tunnel under Del Mar homes and businesses No eminent domain of private property No freight trains with toxic or nuclear cargo in tunnels No threats from vibration, air or noise pollution.
Thank you,
Susan Miller
266 Surfview Court
22 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: S Gay Hugo-Martinez <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 12:20 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: tunnel for train
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am against a tunnel for the train under Del Mar. The train needs to be moved inland.
Gay Hugo-Martinez
1366 Via Alta, Del Mar
23 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tim Davis <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 1:35 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Agenda item number 2
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Red dot letter to speak on the following
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear ammunitions in tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
We are demanding from SANDAG an Engineering Design that achieves those three objectives. Make sure the Environmental Tunnel under Fairgrounds/Lagoon Alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study.
For $300 million dollars I believe SANDAG has enough money to study the I5 corridor option.
Thank you,
Tim Davis
612-940-6169
24 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Edward Evans <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 1:55 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: red dot
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello,
I feel very strongly about the following issues concerning relocation of the railroad tracks:
. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear ammunitions in
tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
4) A thorough report concerning usage and cost/rider of the train line. I have lived in San Diego for 40+ years and have used the train less than 5 times.
Edward B.Evans, MD
Balboa Avenue
25 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: MONICA VALENTINO <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 1:55 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Please submit my comment below regarding Feb 5 DM City Council meeting.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
The 2024 environmental studies need to include study of a tunnel underneath the Lagoon to I-5.
Thank you,
M
Monica Valentino
858 775.2220
eXp Realty
1312 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
REALTOR ®
DRE: # 00836091
[email protected]
26 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tanya Young <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 2:40 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot: Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL REALIGNMENT PROJECT UPDATE" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor Druker and Members of the City Council:
Regarding the necessary relocation of the train tracks in Del Mar, we are writing to support the Environmental Tunnel. SANDAG’s 2024 environmental studies must include the safer option of a tunnel under the Fairgrounds, the Lagoon and on to the I-5.
Thank you for your advocacy.
Sincerely,
Tanya Young and Dr. Michael McManus
TANYA YOUNG STUDIO
[email protected]
858.382.3636
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftanyayoungart.com%2F&data= 05%7C02%7Ccityclerk%40delmar.ca.us%7C1bec1c8c21254f71c4d808dc25d2479d%7Ce57e47ceaa e64f7392493b679aab1eb4%7C0%7C0%7C638426832306506551%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C% 7C&sdata=KSekWZQWNJCjLWRBnXIRegYbWUg%2FE1nL3h9SNX%2FIFkE%3D&reserved=0 https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.instagram.com%2Ftanya _young_studio%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ccityclerk%40delmar.ca.us%7C1bec1c8c21254f71c4d808dc 25d2479d%7Ce57e47ceaae64f7392493b679aab1eb4%7C0%7C0%7C638426832306514062%7CU nknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI 6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DGU3roav6q5hR3Qsj5mMEdZzPTQl6fivCivcv4OyKwU%3D& reserved=0
X: @tanyayoungart
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Ftanyay oungscienceillustration&data=05%7C02%7Ccityclerk%40delmar.ca.us%7C1bec1c8c21254f71c4d80 8dc25d2479d%7Ce57e47ceaae64f7392493b679aab1eb4%7C0%7C0%7C638426832306518938%7 CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXV CI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LPmj%2F%2BM9ePB52IfOWmdJwZ5BoIcKjRoWHvUzyw4 X06Y%3D&reserved=0
27 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jan and Dave Ulrey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 2:42 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: RED DOT letter: SANDAG Rail Alignment
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To SANDAG and City Council members…
As Del Mar residents since 1986, who value our beloved home and community, we are abhorred by the thought of a tunnel, and all of its destructive ramifications, being built under our home and town.
This is outrageous! We say…No tunnel under DM, No eminent domain of private property, and No freight trains under our homes. We are demanding from SANDAG that, at the very least, an EIS study be performed, which not only addresses these demands, but also includes Fairground/Lagoon Alignment to I-5.
Sincerely,
Dave and Jan Ulrey
377 13th Street
Del Mar
Sent from my iPad
28 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Sudeepto Roy <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 3:05 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Valérie Dufort-Roy
Subject: Reference Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL REALIGNMENT PROJECT UPDATE".
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City staff and Council Members,
We request that the new rail realignment be no worse than the present day rails by the ocean bluff, which would specifically entail:
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or ammunition in tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
SANDAG should arrive at an Engineering Design that achieves these three objectives, and also ensure that the Environmental Tunnel under Fairgrounds/Lagoon Alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study.
Thanks, Sudeepto
(Sent using wireless mobile innovations)
29 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Bill Carpenter <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 3:41 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot for Feb 5 City Council Agenda Item 2 LOSSAN PRESENTATION CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar City Council and SANDAG Board –
Train tunnel needs to go AROUND Del Mar (underneath the lagoon and along the I-5) not through it. Tunneling under homes requires eminent domain and threatens peaceful enjoyment of homes. Going around will be FASTER as it won’t face years of lawsuits. Geng the train off the bluffs SOON is important and saves SANDAG money!
Tunneling through Del Mar will disrupt enjoyment of millions of visitors from all over San Diego County that come to the Fairgrounds, the beach and parks.
Going AROUND will open up the lagoons and is the environmentally responsible thing to do – instead of double tracking through the lagoon, remove the lagoon tracks.
110 MPH is an unnecessary pipe dream and there is no data that supports it would build ridership from the low and declining ridership today.
THE ONLY WAY TO PROVE THIS IS A VIABLE AND BEST OPTION IS TO DO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN TO SHOW THE PROS AND CONS. FOR $300M SANDAG CAN INCLUDE THIS COMMON SENSE OPTION THAT DOES NOT TAKE PEOPLE’S HOMES AND CRIPPLE BUSINESS AND ACCESS FOR PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER SAN DIEGO COUNTY.
Community and environmental impacts should be priories #1 and #2 in the SANDAG weighng criteria! Bill Carpenter
Luneta Drive
30 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Barbara Johansen <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 3:42 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: SANDAG Needs to Study Environmental Tunnel Underneath the Lagoon to I-5 Alignment!
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
RED DOT!
Dear Del Mar Council Members:
I am opposed to any tunnel under Del Mar for trains including Freight carrying purposes. SANDAG should definitely study the lagoon to I-5 route entirely. It makes sense in every way to have this alignment with I-5 including massive damages to Del Mar directly versus the other routes including increased costs. We need to have the SANDAG Engineering Designers undertake a study of this tunnel under the Fairgrounds. Del Mar does not want a tunnel under our city and homes, no eminent domain of private property, and no freight trains carrying toxic substances. We want the train off the bluffs sooner than later and as far away from the coastline as possible. In addition, a tunnel under the Fairgrounds would save money since you would not need to replace the bridge across the lagoon! Another benefit that should be considered is an entrance and exit from the tunnel to the Fairgrounds, preferably on the other side of the lagoon. With that design you would not need a platform directly in front of the fairgrounds with crowds, lighting, security, long hours, and obstruction of views. If needed, a walk bridge could be constructed over Jimmy Durante Blvd. I live alongside the trains currently....and a speed of 110 miles an hour is excessive and not needed logically!! SANDAG needs to show the pros and cons of the routes they have already considered...and seriously review the route the citizens of Del Mar are proposing!
Thank You,
Barbara Johansen
255 23rd Street
31 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: L Mike Maier <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 4:06 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL REALIGNMENT PROJECT UPDATE" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
SANDAG must study the Environmental Tunnel (underneath the Lagoon to I-5) to lay out a preliminary engineering design.
This option must be developed to prioritize the health and safety of Del Mar residents.
No tunnel under Del Mar homes and businesses.
No eminent domain of private property.
No freight trains with toxic or nuclear cargo in tunnels.
No threats from vibration, air or noise pollution.
Thank you,
Mike Maier
266 Surfview Ct
32 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Karin Carey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 4:19 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Karin Carey; Dave Carey
Subject: Red Dot Feb 5, 2024; City Council Mtg, Agenda Item VIII; Presentation 2: SANDAG / LOSSAN Update
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Members of the Del Mar City Council:
We are watching SANDAG move forward with the LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project with great concern. We acknowledge that the train track must be moved off of the oceanfront bluffs and relocated to an inland route. We are now at a critical junction in this process, as SANDAG is preparing to file their Notice of Preparation and Notice of Intent per CEQA and NEPA processes, in the coming weeks. Now is the time for the Del Mar City Council to step up and protect the character that makes Del Mar unique and so desirable to all of us who reside, invest in and visit here.
A quick reminder of why we are asking you to fight this fight on our behalf: Our own City Council Mission Statement calls for councilmembers to serve as the representative body that determines the local and regional needs of its citizens, sets goals, makes general policy, and exercises the responsibility to retain and enhance the special character of Del Mar. The Vision Statement calls for the City of Del Mar to be a residential community with a vibrant downtown and a tranquil place of natural beauty where residents and visitors feel safe and enjoy opportunities for recreation and entertainment. The top two goals for the city are to: 1: Preserve and enhance the community character of the City with emphasis on natural resources. GOAL 2: Manage the City’s resources in a fiscally sound and prudent manner in order to protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare.
With that foundation, we ask that the council Adopt a Resolution that A FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL MUST BE STUDIED in 2024.
Now is the time for council members to find common ground and adopt a resolution opposing a high speed freight train directly into and through our town. Now is the time to tell SANDAG
what our Evaluation Criteria is, since they didn't bother to ask us 33 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 when they created their own, two years ago. These requirements reflect our city's Mission and Vision:
1) No Eminent Domain of Private Property
2) No Tunnel Directly Under Homes
3) No Freight Into Residential Neighborhoods
A FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL will meet these requirements and is the only solution that makes sense.
A portal north of the fairgrounds with a tunnel under the fairgrounds and the San Dieguito River is an alternative that NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED equally for study in 2024 along with any other tunnel alternatives. The train will have to slow slightly, to navigate the curve east to the I-5. If SANDAG can “trade-off” a minute and a half of travel time, the alignment can be built without having to take homes through eminent domain, and can avoid the risks associated with routing a freight train through residential neighborhoods.
This alignment, along with a south portal near "Pump Station 65" would also add to the health and natural state of both the San Dieguito and Los Penasquitos Lagoons.
Members of the Del Mar City Council, please know that stakeholders are counting on you to unite and fight this fight. As SANDAG prepares their environmental reports, the City Council needs to be prepared to defend Del Mar, exercising their responsibility to retain and enhance the special character of Del Mar, and protect the public’s health, safety, and welfare. We ask that the council Adopt a Resolution that A FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL MUST BE STUDIED in 2024. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Karin Carey
Zuni Drive
34 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Camilla Rang <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 5:22 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 2, City Council meeting 02.05.2024
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
SANDAG, Del Mar City Council,
It makes absolutely no sense in choosing a route that will take peoples ‘homes away from them when there is an alternative that does not uproot and destroys people’s houses, lives and dreams.
Would you want your house to be taken away from you to have a rail road built through your property? Who gives you the right to confiscate and demolish peoples ‘homes? You have permission to run the train on the bluff. The bluff is failing and the train has to be relocated. Nowhere in that contract back in 1930's does it say that the day the bluff fails, you can pick and choose any other spot in Del Mar that you like for your rail road. Nowhere does it even say that Del Mar even MIGHT let you choose another route.
This is our land, not yours.
Now, it is in everyone’s interest to move the train from the bluff or passengers will die when that train falls down. Again, that does not mean that YOU can choose the route. You should take the route that Del Mar says you can take. A beggar cannot choose. And we are loudly telling you to take the route that does not demolish people´s homes, the route that starts away from homes as a trench in Solana Beach, goes under the Fairground, the lagoon and I-5. That´s the one we let you take.
That route will be beautiful. It will unite the south end of Solana Beach instead of having it divided between beachside and off-site, with a horrible train trench as it is now. As you dig the trench deeper to prepare it for the tunnel portal, what is today just an ugly dividing trench, can become a park. Kids can play soccer, dogs can run, people can do yoga, and you will also be able to walk from east to west Solana Beach without having to go find a long lost bridge. Peoples property values in Solana Beach will go up and everyone will be happy. Everyone should be onboard with this route. It´s a win-win situation.
Yes, more expensive, but you will not have to confiscate and demolish peoples homes! Until we know where the tunnel will go, put the construction of the train bridge between Solana Beach and Del Mar on hold. What a potential complete waste of tax money. When the train route is decided to go under the Fairground and the lagoon, you would have wasted $330 million dollar! Save those $330 million dollars to instead beautify and cover the deepened trench in Solana Beach for the Fairground tunnel. 35 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Steve Eskeland <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 6:21 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez; Dwight Worden; David Druker; Dan Quirk Subject: SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project, item #5 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members,
Thank you for your time in studying the potential impacts of tunneling through Del Mar.
I’d like to point out what happened to the folks who lived and worked in Little Tokyo, Los Angeles, during the major LA Metro realignment project from 2014 to 2023 (Metro Rail construction project impacts life in Little Tokyo by TAKESHI NAKAYAMA, Nichi Bei Weekly Contributor Dec 22, 2022 https://www.nichibei.org/2022/12/metro-rail-constructionproject-impacts-life-in-little-tokyo/). They had to suffer years of disruptions to their businesses and daily life due to the closing of streets, dump trucks removing tons and tons of cubic yards of dirt, loss of utility connections ( i.e., prolonged outages of internet service), loud jackhammer noises, and smoke and dust that they had to inhale and constantly clean out in their businesses and homes. I understand that in the densely built-up area of downtown LA, there are limited choices of where one can build a major infrastructure project. Little Tokyo may not have had a better alternate route.
Here in Del Mar, there is one best area that should be considered to minimize impacts to businesses and homeowners. I urge SANDAG to choose the alignment closest to the I-5 freeway - where the fewest homes and businesses would suffer severe consequences from a decade of construction.
Sincerely,
Stephen Eskeland
Seaview Avenue
36 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ken Olson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 6:26 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL REALIGNMENT PROJECT UPDATE CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I respectfully request that SANDAG give full consideration to a tunnel that avoids the residential areas of the City of Del Mar
Ken Olson
[email protected]
37 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Donna Shaw <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 7:46 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Rail realignment
Importance: High
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
My comments for tonight's meeting:
SANDAG gave us an example of 11 locations in the United States where there are freight trains that run under people's homes. All 11 of them, except for 2 were built in the 1800s. The other 2 were built in 1904. I doubt there were even residential neighborhoods in these locations when the tunnel was built.
Please protect our homes and Del Mar! Study a realignment option near the Fairgrounds to the 5 and not through Del Mar!
Respectfully,
Donna Shaw
1973 Seaview Avenue
38 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: suren dutia <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:10 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Ashley Jones; David Druker; Terry Gaasterland; Tracy Martinez; Dwight Worden; Dan Quirk; jas.grewal
Subject: RED DOT: Comment on City Council Agenda Item 2: SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project Update
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
As members of your community for over 30 years, we wish to provide you our feedback and strong recommendation on Agenda Item #2 regarding direction of SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project. We think it is very important that SANDAG study in 2024 the environmental alternative for railroad relocation: a tunnel underneath the San Dieguito Lagoon and over to the I-5 highway that would remove the tracks from two lagoons – not only San Dieguito, but also Peñesquito.
SANDAG has an opportunity to provide effective leadership by studying it and then making it a reality – a railroad track relocation that would remove the need for berms, bridges, and hard structures that impede water flow through the lagoons.
Just imagine the San Dieguito Lagoon with so much more open space to wind and flow south and west of the Fairgrounds with no railroad bridge at all! Imagine the Peñasquitos Lagoon restored to its pre-1882 natural state!
At this juncture, what do we need to learn from environmental impact studies of this environmental alternative? We really need to know how the tracks can slope downward starting somewhere in the existing Solana Beach trench. We also need to know how to minimize impacts on the City of Solana Beach and freight traffic in the LOSSAN corridor due to construction of this environmental tunnel. Further, we need to know where the tunnel will be deep enough to progress underneath the bottom of the San Dieguito Lagoon and riverbed.
To the south, we need to know whether the tunnel portal can be east of the Peñasquitos Lagoon and connect to tracks that continue to Sorrento Valley station.
As our elected representatives, we strongly urge you to please insist that SANDAG do what it takes to study this environmental alternative. SANDAG needs to create the preliminary engineering design for the study, and then does the study.
We do not know whether a tunnel can be built through the Del Mar Hill. We do not know its environmental impacts. It is important to study both approaches to railroad relocation. Only then will we be able to assess which is best and why.
Sincerely,
39 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 Suren G. Dutia
Jas K. Grewal
Residents of Del Mar for 30 plus years.
40 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Payson Stevens <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 8:13 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Angelina Neglia; Terry TG. Gaasterland; Camilla Rang Subject: RED DOT: February 5, 2024 Meeting Reference Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL
REALIGNMENT PROJECT
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
February 5, 2024 Meeting
Reference Item 2 "SANDAG LOSSAN RAIL REALIGNMENT PROJECT To the City Clerk, Del Mar CA 92014
February 5, 2024
My wife and I have been homeowner/residents of Del Mar for 51 years and been involved or witnessed a number of major, impactful City projects over the years. The current issue moving the train tracks off the Del Mar Bluffs may potentially be the most disruptive environmental issue the town has ever faced if a tunnel is constructed through parts of the city.
It is essential that the numerous resident’s concerns and voices be heard and that City officials (Council, Staff, etc.) ensure their support of the environmentally safer alternative be presented to SANDAG, with the appropriate EIS/environmental studies. A tunnel under the Fairgrounds to the I5 transportation corridor is the best alternative for the wellbeing of the residents and preserving our City’s unique character.
So, we join the many voices saying No Tunnel Under Del Mar and the efforts of the local organization, Save Del Mar (https://savedelmar.org) and all the environmental and economic points they have raised on their website and print material (see the main points below).
Please confirm receipt of this email.
Sincerely yours,
Payson R. Stevens
Kamal K. Kapur
411 7th St.
Del Mar, CA 92014
The 2024 environmental studies need to include study of a tunnel underneath the Lagoon to I-5
41 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear ammunitions in tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
We are demanding from SANDAG an Engineering Design that achieves those three objectives. Make sure the Environmental Tunnel under Fairgrounds/Lagoon Alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study.
OUR PRIORITIES:
1. TRAIN OFF THE BLUFFS
2. SLOPE LESS THAN 2% GRADE (for freight)
3. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE (two lagoons will be saved)
4. NO IMPACT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY (NOISE, VIBRATION, SINK HOLES, AIR
POLLUTION)
5. NO DIGGING UNDER HOMES
6. NO FREIGHT TRAINS UNDER PEOPLE’S HOMES
7. SPEED DOES NOT NEED TO BE 110MPH (there are many 90 degree turns and low speeds on the NEW rail lines in Orange and LA county)
THE ONLY WAY TO PROVE THIS IS A VIABLE OPTION IS TO DO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN TO SHOW THE PROS AND CONS. FOR $300M SANDAG
CAN INCLUDE THIS COMMON SENSE OPTION THAT DOES NOT DESTROY THE TOWN OF DEL MAR, TAKE PEOPLE’S HOMES AND CRIPPLE BUSINESS, AND ACCESS.
--
Payson R. Stevens
Science Communications
Artwork & Paintings
Indian National Park/Friends of GHNP
42 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: JP McDermott <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 9:09 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: SANDAG Tunnel Cost Benefit Analysis City Council Meeting 2/5/24 Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are JP and Candy McDermott and our family has been in Del Mar for 60 years. We are opposed to any tunnel that goes under the City and would cause any eminent domain. We also support having SANDAG have an independent cost benefit analysis conducted, looking at ALL plans for the bluffs, rail improvements and making sure were not having a railroad bridge replaced for more than $50M only to be abandoned if the rail tunnel goes under the fairgrounds. Someone needs to be looking at all the proposals and letting us know the options.
Should a cost benefit analysis show the tunnel is the logical move, we support the tunnel under the fairgrounds and under I5.
Thanks you.
--
Thanks!
JP
925.858.9510
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Diane Salyer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 9:17 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Sandag Lossan relocation project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To whom it may concern:
We are long time citizens of Del Mar. We are strongly opposed to a tunnel under the city for the relocation of the trains.
Something must be done as soon as possible, but we are very concerned that the alternative routes for moving the tracks have not been explored thoroughly. with sincere effort and consideration.
There is no question that there is a bad impact, short and long term, upon residents, of a tunnel under Del Mar. Excuses not to study with unbiased thoroughness other options simply do not fly. Where there is a will there is a way. In our state funding is found for all sorts of less important issues.
Sincerely,
Diane Salyer
777 Kalamath
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Hanna D. Hanna
Seaview Avenue
Del Mar, Ca
February 5, 2024
Subject: Urgent Appeal to Safeguard Del Mar's Unique Character Dear Members of the Del Mar City Council,
I write to you with a deep sense of urgency and concern regarding the ongoing LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project led by SANDAG.
We acknowledge the necessity of relocating the train track away from the oceanfront bluffs, recognizing the importance of preserving our natural beauty while ensuring the safety and well-being of our residents and visitors. As we stand at this pivotal juncture, where SANDAG is poised to file their Notice of Preparation and Notice of Intent, I implore the Del Mar City Council to take decisive action to protect the unique character that makes Del Mar an exceptional place to reside, invest, and visit.
Your commitment to Del Mar's essence, as outlined in the City Council Mission and Vision Statements, is the bedrock upon which our community thrives. The Mission Statement calls for councilmembers to be the representative body determining local and regional needs, setting goals, making general policy, and upholding the responsibility to retain and enhance Del Mar's special character. The Vision Statement paints a picture of our city as a residential haven with a vibrant downtown and tranquil natural beauty, fostering a sense of safety and providing opportunities for recreation and entertainment. The top two goals underscore the importance of preserving community character and managing resources prudently to protect the public's health, safety, and welfare.
In alignment with these foundational principles, I urge the Del Mar City Council to adopt a Resolution advocating for the study of a FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL in 2024.
This proposal is not just a solution; it is a strategic imperative to ensure the continued prosperity and desirability of Del Mar.
Now is the opportune moment for council members to find common ground and adopt a resolution opposing a high-speed freight train traversing our town. As the custodians of Del Mar's character, it is incumbent upon you to communicate our Evaluation Criteria to SANDAG explicitly. These criteria, reflecting our Mission and Vision, prioritize:
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1. No Eminent Domain of Private Property
2. No Tunnel Directly Under Homes
3. No Freight Into Residential Neighborhoods
The FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL stands as the preeminent solution that aligns with these criteria, providing a judicious way forward.
A north portal north of the fairgrounds, coupled with a tunnel beneath the fairgrounds and the San Dieguito River, is a viable alternative that merits top consideration in the upcoming studies. The trade-off of a minute and a half in travel time, as the train slows to navigate the curve east to the I-5, can avert the need for eminent domain and mitigate the risks associated with routing a freight train through residential neighborhoods. Additionally, a south portal near "Pump Station 65" promises to enhance the health and natural state of both the San Dieguito and Los Penasquitos Lagoons.
Members of the Del Mar City Council, stakeholders are relying on your unified commitment to safeguard our community. As SANDAG progresses with their environmental reports, the City Council must be prepared to champion Del Mar, fulfilling its responsibility to preserve and enhance our special character and protect the public's health, safety, and welfare.
I respectfully implore the Del Mar City Council to adopt a Resolution stipulating the study of a FAIRGROUNDS LAGOON TUNNEL in 2024. Your time, consideration, and decisive action on this matter are paramount, and we trust in your unwavering commitment to Del Mar's future.
Thank you for your attention and dedicated service to our beloved community.
Sincerely,
Hanna D. Hanna
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Neuman, Tom <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 9:58 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Item 2
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Although I will try to be present at the City Council Meeting, I am not sure circumstances will allow me to be present. Should I not be able to personally attend the meeting I would like to strongly state:
1. There should be no tunnel under Deep Mar or under any homes 2. There should be no eminent domain (confiscation) of private property 3. There should be no freight trains under homes, as freight trains carrying dangerous cargos present a risk of toxic spills, explosions, and/or fires. Think of the catastrophe in East Palestine, Ohio. That should serve as a dwarfing that freight train derailments and toxic spills do occur. According to NPR News, there were over 1,100 freight train derailments in 2023.
SANDAG should consider a plan to ensure:
1. Trains are not on the bluffs.
2. That there is less than a @% grade (for freight trains) 3. Saves two lagoons and is environmentally sensitive 4. There is no impact to private property (noise, vibration, sink holes and air pollution all need to be considered).
5. There is no digging under private homes 6. There are no freight trains under private homes 7.
There is no need for 110 mph speed along the new route.
SANDAG should, in good conscience, do the engineering design to show the pros and cons of a route that does not take people’s homes, cripple business, destroy the character of Del Mar and expose the people of Del Mar to untoward dangers.
Tom Neuman, MD, FACP, FACPM, FUHM
Emeritus Professor of Medicine
UCSD School of Medicine
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Howard Miller <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 10:08 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Sandag Lossan Rail Realignment Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Sandag Lossan Rail Realignment Project Item # 5 and # 2 Dear members:
This is to voice my vehement opposition to any tunnel
underneath my house on Camino Del Mar. Potential damage to my structure over time from vibration, and disruption of privacy from ongoing, and continuing noise certainly is not what I ever thought was feasible when purchased years ago on Seaview Avenue.
There is no way to calculate monetary damage to the value to any structures should this project be adopted, should the tunnel go under Camino
del Mar.
Placement of the tunnel would be far less disruptive to the vast majority, if placed under the fairgrounds property. It certainly would be a safer approach and unmeasurable less damage to property.
Respectfully,
Howard Miller
1731 Seaview Ave
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: JOHN SPELICH <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 11:04 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: RED DOT for Item 2, Feb 5 Council Meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Please add my voice to the chorus asking to ensure SANDAG considers all the options that have been suggested as to how to solve the pressing rail-off-the-bluffs issue.
A set of agreed priorities seems to be emerging including the need to avoid tunneling under residents’ homes, avoiding the operation of potentially dangerous freight traffic in a tunnel under a residential area, and opposition to eminent domain. SANDAG needs to understand that the Del Mar community wants to be cooperative in solving a very important issue. However, SANDAG needs to also demonstrate that it understands our concerns and one of the best ways to do that is to study some of the alternatives to their present plan.
Engineers love to engineer, and the proposed multi-billion-dollar tunnel, the double tracking from Solana Beach north to the County Line and other massive tear-ups that are planned would be a career dream for any engineering staff. However, these plans ignore the realities that we have been presented, such as plummeting passenger traffic. Just because one CAN do something, it doesn't mean they should. Let’s not even talk about the lack of budget for such a mega project. It’s hard to believe that in a time we cannot find money to solve the Tijuana sewage crisis that plagues our cities to the south that someone is going to pony up the $4-6 billion this project will ultimately cost.
SANDAG is exhibiting tunnel vision in the approach to this issue. What about a freight line from the border up the I-15 that connects via the Sprinter line to Oceanside? What about extending the Trolley from La Jolla up the I-5 to Oceanside stopping at the Fairground, Solana Beach, Cardiff, Encinitas, and Carlsbad, which would actually put the passenger traffic into places people would want to go such as the great restaurants and retail, the Outlet mall, the auto mall, etc.? Each station could also feature affordable housing atop as is done all over the rest of the world. Those suggestions alone would save billions of dollars, reduce pollutions, and accomplish the mission without boring holes under houses, endangering fragile ecosystems like our lagoons, and destroying communities along the coast. This would also allow the coastal communities to capitalize on valuable real estate redevelopment in their city centers and create ribbon parks along the old train lines.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 One additional thought: The City Council should consider creating an ad-hoc advisory committee of residents (we have some fine minds that live here such as engineers, attorneys, and assorted Ph.D.’s of all disciplines). This committee could be a go-between with SANDAG staff, the Council and our interested group of residents to ensure information is flowing both ways and to stay on top of staff developments and hopefully encourage as broad a search for solutions as possible. I doubt you will have much trouble recruiting applicants for this ad-hoc committee. SANDAG will say it has bent over backward to get input from the city, but as a veteran of 40+ years of working to engineer public consent for things, what they’ve done is wallpaper, smoke, and mirrors. Their actions speak louder and to date they’ve been clear on what they want to do and have indicated through action that they don’t need anyone’s permission. We need to show them we are willing to meet halfway but will not be steam-rolled.
Thank you for your consideration. It is regrettable that SANDAG missed the deadline to submit its presentation so we could review before the meeting. I look forward to tonight’s briefing.
Sincerely,
John W Spelich
[email protected]
David Way, Del Mar
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 10:49 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot for Feb 5 City Council Agenda Item 2 LOSSAN PRESENTATION Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar City Council and SANDAG Board –
It is now 10:45am on the 5th and we have not seen the presentaon from SANDAG as promised (on Friday the 2nd). Residents must submit red dot comments by noon. Aer aending mulple SANDAG meengs regarding the LOSSAN train relocaon and subming mulple comments at the meengs, via email and at the field office in Del Mar, SANDAG has not produced any report summarizing that data. It feels like SANDAG is not being transparent and resident feedback is being ignored.
Once again:
NO tunneling under homes.
NO double track through the Los Penasquitos Lagoon, it is environmentally irresponsible. NO freight trains under homes.
NO eminent domain of private property – there are opons to avoid this. The 2024 environmental studies need to include the study of the tunnel under the lagoon to I-5.
Community and environmental impacts should be priories #1 and #2 in the SANDAG weighng criteria.
Respecully submied,
Debbie Carpenter
Luneta Drive
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Barbara Myers <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 11:18 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: LOSSAN realignment item 5
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are concerned about the rail realignment project and the impact on Del Mar residents and our homes and hope the project will not jeopardize our homes with any proposed tunnel. The possibility of going away from homes is one we desire especially considering that we live with the possibility of earthquakes at any moment. We want to see residents protected first and foremost.
Doug & Barbara Myers
2143 Heather Lane
Sent from my iPhone
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Evan Strawn <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 11:37 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Comment on Item 2- SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project Update Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Good morning,
I’m commenng on item 2 on behalf of the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce.
The need for LOSSAN Rail Realignment has once again become clear following the recent bluff landslide in San Clemente that has altered the LOSSAN rail route indefinitely. Similar incidents have occurred in the past in Del Mar and in jurisdicons up and down the coast. The Del Mar area is vulnerable to connued coastal erosion and future closures of the rail route.
This rail corridor is the second busiest intercity rail corridor in the country and is crucial for the movement of passengers and goods in and out of our region. The rail realignment project can help ensure the long-term stability of this corridor and protect the economic impact it has on our region.
We thank SANDAG staff for their work on this project and the Mayor and Councilmembers for their thoughul consideraon. We look forward to hearing future updates on the project! Evan Strawn
Policy Advisor
San Diego Regional
Chamber of Commerce
SDChamber.org
This email message and any aachments hereto are the exclusive property of The San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce. This message and any aachments hereto are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain informaon that is confidenal and proprietary. You are hereby nofied that any use, disseminaon, distribuon or copying of this message, data or aachments without the express permission of the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce is strictly prohibited.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: Independent, forward-looking research is needed to assess the best rail options Attachments: cramton-patrick-study-needed-to-explore-rail-options.pdf; cramton-patrick-studyneeded-to-explore-rail-options-slides.pdf; cramton-patrick-study-needed-to-explorerail-options-slides.pptx From: Peter Cramton <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 11:43 AM
To: Sarah Krietor <[email protected]>; City Clerk Mail Box <[email protected]> Cc: Ashley Jones <[email protected]>; Kevin Patrick <[email protected]>; Catherine Cramton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Independent, forward-looking research is needed to assess the best rail options CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Sarah and Ashley,
I have attached materials for today's City Council meeting. This is for the rail relocation item.
The materials were jointly prepared by Kevin Patrick and me. Our plan is to present at the meeting in sequence. First, me and then Patrick. My wife, Catherine, will also be present. She would like to donate her 3 minutes to me. Thus, I will present for 6 minutes and Kevin for 3 minutes. Tracy Martinez said that this was fine as long as all three of us are present.
For our presentations, Kevin and I will use the attached PowerPoint slides. Thus, we should present in order:
Peter Cramton, 6 minutes (3 donated from Catherine)
Kevin Patrick, 3 minutes
Please include the attached pdf in the red dot. This is a summary of our presentation. It is fine to include the slides in the red dot as well as a pdf (attached).
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.
Kind regards,
Peter
Peter Cramton
[email protected] cramton.umd.edu +1 530 408 6698
University of Maryland
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Independent, forward-looking research is needed to assess the best rail options Before spending $20 billion tunneling through Del Mar and San Clemente, consider alternatives and do what is best.
Peter Cramton1 and Kevin Patrick 2
The Coaster train along Del Mar's eroding bluff. San Clemente's closure in January/February 2024.
Orange County Transportation Authority's and San Diego Association of Governments' first step toward addressing the coastal train off San Clemente's and Del Mar's eroding coast should be a forward-looking benefit-cost analysis to identify the best alternative to the existing location. It may be a rail-to-trail conversion.
The San Clemente and Del Mar rail issues are intimately linked. Passage through both towns is required for the rail to connect Los Angeles and San Diego. OCTA and SANDAG must collaborate with the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency and other local, state, and federal agencies in addressing the challenge.
Del Mar and San Clemente coastal erosion make the rail line unsustainable. SANDAG has focused on one remedy: rail relocation, a venture estimated to take 12 years (2035) and cost $4 billion. In Orange County, the relocation cost estimate is $16 billion. But is moving the rail worth the cost? To answer this question, OCTA and SANDAG need a forward-looking benefit-cost analysis — as the US Department of Transportation requires — to identify the best option to achieve our goals.
Our major research universities and institutes have international experts in economics, transportation, engineering, public health, and policy who are eager to engage in addressing societal challenges. We encourage the relevant government organizations to create an initiative to examine this topic. Talented research teams would then submit research proposals for evaluation and peer review. An expedited study 1 Peter Cramton is an Emeritus Professor of Economics at the University of Maryland. Since 1983, he has researched auctions and market design. The focus is the design of markets for many related items. Applications include markets for communications, electricity, transportation, and financial securities. He has introduced innovative market designs in many industries worldwide. He has advised many governments and bidders on auctions and market design. He received his BS in Engineering from Cornell University and his PhD in Business from Stanford University. 2 Kevin Patrick is an Emeritus Professor at the School of Public Health and the Qualcomm Institute, University of California San Diego. He founded the Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems and the Exercise & Physical Activity Resource Center at the Qualcomm Institute. He served as Editor-in-Chief of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine for 20 years. NIH, NSF, CDC, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation have supported his research, including clinical trials, formative research, survey methodology, novel measurement technologies, behavioral interventions, and information technology.
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 would take more than a year to complete, but this is time well spent. The sooner we are on the right path, the lower the cost, the higher the benefit, and the faster the resolution.
The alternatives evaluated should include the retirement of the rail line. The rail line is not essential. San Diego was not significantly affected when coastal collapse led to months-long train outages. Consider each rail line use: military, freight, and passenger train.
A spokesperson for Camp Pendleton said that closure would have "little to no impact" because most military equipment is moved on trucks. The little that is carried by train can be diverted to nighttime trucks.
Regarding freight, the rail moves 0.04 percent of California's freight. Its role is tiny between San Clemente and San Diego because we are the last stop in the rail network. Trains move 28 percent of US freight and serve a vital role in the heartland of the US, moving coal, salt, oil, chemicals, cement, agriculture, and container goods. San Diego is far from the heartland and does not have an industrial economy. Interstate 5 could readily absorb San Diego's freight without increasing congestion. In the 12 years it would take to build a tunnel, vehicle technology advances will significantly increase I-5 capacity, especially at night when selfdriving trucks can platoon effectively. These technologies exist today. Advanced versions will be implemented by 2035, irrespective of the train decision, so the incremental cost of these technologies is zero.
The prominent use of the rail line is passenger transit. Yet passenger use has been declining since 2016 [Surfliner, Coaster] on the Del Mar segment. If we optimistically assume ridership increases to the 2019 prepandemic levels of 1,134,881 roundtrips per year, a tunnel tax of $132 per roundtrip in 2023 dollars would be required to cover the $4 billion cost assuming a 3 percent real discount rate and a 100-year tunnel life.
The analogous San Clemente tunnel tax to cover the $16 billion spent is $779 per roundtrip, totaling $911 per roundtrip through both towns. A nonstop economy roundtrip airfare from John Wayne International to New York City on United Airlines is $315. Thus, including only the tunneling cost, a roundtrip from San Clemente to San Diego (60 miles) is three times more expensive than a nonstop roundtrip airfare from John Wayne to New York City (2440 miles).
Won't train ridership increase because of population growth? No population growth is expected in the coming decades. Moreover, the train must compete with rapidly improving alternatives as we electrify transportation. Declining ridership is the norm as new technologies replace old ones.
SANDAG Board, July 2023, SANDAG Data Science Group
3 February 5, 2024 Item 02
3 One of the train's glaring problems is equity. The train's tiny ridership caters to the highest-income residents in San Diego. Sixty-four percent of the Coaster's riders have incomes of $75,000 or more, and 97 percent own a car and typically drive their vehicles to the train station. There are many better opportunities to improve transit, especially for those with less income. To better serve lower-income groups, money should be spent on improving transit options targeted to the group's needs.
But wouldn't the rail line reduce emissions and traffic congestion? Sadly, no. Diesel trains are a source of noise, carbon, nitrogen oxide, and particulate emissions. Tunnel construction would release considerable emissions. The train diverts 4,500 out of 1.3 million daily automobile trips, or 0.3 percent from I-5. A rail-totrail conversion would move many more without emissions.
Transportation is undergoing a rapid transformation. These new technologies offer consumers better options. Better options displace rail. Transportation technologies most apt to replace passenger trains include e-bikes, e-scooters, and electric vehicles. The specific technologies adopted will depend on which technologies best serve consumers. Vibrant competition among these technologies will bring rapid gains in services at reduced cost.
These technologies will improve transportation efficiency. Congested highways can benefit from the advanced features of electric vehicles. Freeway capacity increases with automated vehicle control—from enhanced cruise control to full self-driving. Advanced passenger and freight vehicles move cooperatively to maximize safe throughput.
Even before self-driving arrives, ridesharing and carpooling apps will continue to displace train passengers.
These apps have the enormous advantage of doing what users want: moving from A to B. With trains, the user must get from A to the train station and then from another train station to B. This is a primary reason cars tend to dominate trains.
With retirement, the rail corridor can become a vibrant green passageway connecting communities up and down the coast. Today, countless walkers, runners, and bikers are moving along the coast. The demand is proven.
Hikers on a trail in Torrey Pines State Park
Rails-to-trails have a long history of success in urban areas. They have been shown to improve public health, boost economic development, and connect communities. Here are a few examples. The High Line in New York City is a 1.45-mile-long elevated park built on a former freight rail line; it is now one of the most popular tourist destinations in New York City. The Emerald Necklace in Boston, Massachusetts, is a system of 4 February 5, 2024 Item 02
4 parks and parkways; it includes several rails-to-trails, including the Charles River Bike Path and the Esplanade. These rail-to-trail conversions harness the natural beauty of the setting. The same — in abundance — would be true in San Diego and Orange Counties.
The current rail corridor from San Clemente to San Diego is 60 miles long. It would be a bold move to turn this entire right of way into a trail like the ones described. However, forward-looking efforts like this have precedents in California, with our national leadership in improving air quality and the California Coastal Act of 1976. These helped preserve and promote residents' health, well-being, and access to recreation statewide. Such an extensive rail-to-trail effort in a densely populated area of the state could have an equal if not greater impact on the public's health and become internationally renowned.
Years of research have documented the positive benefits of rails-to-trails initiatives.
Increased physical activity across populations. Studies consistently show that rails-to-trails conversions increase physical activity among diverse populations. The availability of safe, accessible trails encourages more people to engage in walking, cycling, and other forms of active transportation.
Reduce the prevalence of obesity. The research links the presence of trails to lower obesity rates. By providing a convenient and enjoyable way to exercise, these trails help combat obesity across age groups by promoting regular physical activity.
Enhanced access to recreational spaces. The conversion of rail corridors into trails improves access to recreational resources. This is particularly valuable for children and families, as proximity to such resources is associated with reduced childhood obesity rates and promotes lifelong healthy habits.
Support physical activity among diverse groups. Rails to trails projects cater to a wide range of physical activities, including walking, biking, and using e-bikes. This inclusivity makes the trails appealing to a broad audience, from casual walkers to more serious cyclists and among older adults and those with disabilities, thereby supporting diverse fitness and mobility needs.
Perceived safety and positive public attitudes. The studies find that these trails are perceived as safe environments for physical activity, which is crucial for encouraging usage among all age groups. Positive public attitudes towards trails further support community engagement and participation.
Broader health and community benefits. Beyond physical health, the availability of trails contributes to improved mental well-being and social interaction opportunities. Trails serve as community assets that enhance the quality of life and foster a sense of community among users. They improve air quality by reducing emissions from cars, promote biodiversity, and reduce urban heat and noise pollution.
The combined population of Orange and San Diego Counties is about 6.5 million. Imagine the potential benefits to community health and well-being if just 5-10% of the population used this new trail for transportation and recreation every week. This estimate is not far-fetched. Research showed that one such trail in Northeastern Pennsylvania had 10,000 trail visitors per month over 10 months of 2018. More precise forecasting is needed, but it seems that the number who would benefit from a new OC-SD trail would dwarf those who are currently using the corridor for train commuting. 5 February 5, 2024 Item 02
5 Our message is not that rail retirement dominates rail relocation. We do not know what the best option is.
The stakes are sufficiently high that an independent, forward-looking analysis, including Orange and San Diego Counties, is needed. Such a study would rigorously explore the best rail relocation and retirement alternatives using state-of-the-art methods, data, and expertise from many disciplines.
We oppose plans to move ahead with rail relocation before considering retirement. Retirement may be the best choice, as these illustrative charts capture our intuition formed over many decades of research in transportation, medicine, public health, communications, information technology, and electricity. Our intuition may be wrong, hence the need for scientific evidence-based analysis.
Illustrative intuition of benefits and costs of rail retirement (light shade) and relocation (dark shade) Retirement brings extensive benefits as the right-of-way is transformed into a vibrant trail for walkers, runners, and those on wheels— bikes, e-bikes, skates, skateboards, scooters, and e-scooters. There are direct benefits from use, both commuting and recreational. Indeed, we would expect recreation to be a prominent use. Our coastal resource brings joy to millions today; the trail would amplify that joy. The trail better promotes sustainable transportation and improves air quality.
For costs, the most significant differences are in construction costs, land acquisition, environmental damage, and social disruption. Spending even a small portion of the retirement cost savings on improving transit options for lower-income users would promote equity.
Careful study is needed to confirm our intuition or explain why it is wrong.
Passenger train usage has declined in recent years because people have better options. This trend will continue in the years ahead as new technologies bring ever-better options. A rail-to-trail pathway would move more people along our beautiful coast at a fraction of the expense and bring joy to all who use it. Let us study the leading alternatives to see what is best for Southern California. 6 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Peter Cramton
Emeritus Professor of Economics, University of Maryland Electricity Communications Transportation
7 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Rail? Trail?
8 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Independent, forward-looking benefit-cost analysis, including San Diego & Orange Counties How to best meet transportation needs from 2035?
Rigorous peer-reviewed scientific analysis of best relocation and retirement alternatives Conducted by international experts at major research universities (e.g., UCSD & UCI) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Reduced traffic congestion
Direct benefits from use
Enhanced public health
Improved air quality
Promotes sustainable
transportation
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Construction costs
Land acquisition
Environmental damage
Operating & maintenance
costs
Social disruption
Benefits Costs
Retire
Relocate
Retire
Relocate
9 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Kevin Patrick, MD, MS
Emeritus Professor, School of Public Health & The Qualcomm Institute University of California San Diego
Major influences on health
60 miles of Railroad Right of
Way from San Clemente to
San Diego
Can it be used for
better purposes?
10 February 5, 2024 Item 02
We have an enormous opportunity to improve the health of individuals in the entire region from San Clemente to the City of San Diego if we relocate the train and substitute it with
a multi-purpose trail system -
Sallis, et al (2012) Circulation; Basset et al (2008) JPAH; Wolch et al (2011) Health & Place; Katsis, Patrick et al. (2017) CHASE; Price et al (2012) Transportation Research Part A; etc. • Increased Physical Activity: Trails boost activity for all ages • Obesity Reduction: Trails linked to lower levels of obesity and other disease • Access to Recreational Spaces: Rails to trails enhance recreation access • Supports Activities for Many: Trails appeal to walkers, cyclists, e-bike users • Perceived Safety: Trails seen as safe, encouraging wider use • Health and Community Benefits: Trails improve health, well-being, and community connection
• Walkability & social connections: Associated with increased life expectancy in San Diego County
11 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Bottom Line: These complex, interrelated issues require holistic analysis by an independent entity, capable of informing decisions across short to long-term horizons, while considering the needs of all regional stakeholders.
• Improved Air Quality: Trails cut car use, lowering emissions • Environmental Conservation: Trails boost biodiversity and counter urban heat • Economic Benefits: Trails raise property values, spur local tourism • Transportation Cost Savings: Trails offer cheaper, car-free travel options • Sustainable Development: Eco-friendly transport & urban resilience • Noise Reduction: Less car dependence reduces urban noise pollution.
Sallis, et al (2015) IJBNPA; Hartig et al (2014) Ann Rev Pub Health; Wolfe & Mennis, (2012) Landscape and Urban Planning; Larsen et al, (2016) PLoS ONE; McBride-Steward et al (2017) Urban Forestry & Urban Greening In addition to direct benefits on human health, a variety of other positive outcomes result from or are associated with improved greenspace and infrastructure like trails -
12 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Vicki Welch <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 12:36 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Rail Realignment Project
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Members of the Del Mar City Council,
We are watching w/ great concern as SANDAG moves forward with the LOSSAN Rail Realignment Project and what the best option is for all concerned.
We realize that a decision and plan needs to be reached but are shocked at learning there could be significant impacts to the City of Del Mar and the residents and business owners.
We need the Del mar City council to stand up and protect our interests and the character of the city so unique and desirable to all of us who reside, live and visit here.
You are the representative body that determines and communicates local and regional needs of the citizens it represents.
As a representative of the City your role is to both preserve and enhance the character of the city and to manage the city’s resources in a fiscally sound manner in order to protect the public’s health, safety and welfare.
We ask that you adopt a Resolution that a Fairgrounds Lagoon tunnel must be studied .
We ask that you adopt a resolution opposing a high speed freight train path directly through our town.
Please stand strong for:
1. No Eminent Domain of Private Property(huge litigation risks)
2. No Tunnel directly under our homes ( many of which sit on sandstone hills which would be disrupted by the construction and movement of earth and underground water pathways w/ disastrous consequences and lawsuits to follow. Huge financial implications at individual homeowners and for the city itself, not to mention the disruption of business to local merchants during construction)
3. No Freight into residential neighborhoods
It is ludicrous for the city of Del mar to even be considered as a relocation for the rail.
We are counting on you to stand strong for protecting all of our interests.
Thank you for your Time,
Victoria Welch and Stan Silbert
530 Zuni Dr
858-232-2469
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
San Diego LOSSAN Rail Realignment
Project Update
Coleen Clementson, Chief Executive Officer
Robyn Wapner, Director of Public Affairs
Danny Veeh, Rail Planning Program Manager
Keith Greer, Manager of Environmental Compliance
Del Mar City Council | Item 2 | February 5, 2024
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
When We Last Met
| 2
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Engaging with the Community
Events and office hours
5 Public Workshops
Community Field Office
| 3
3 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 4
Engaging with the Community
How we heard from you
Written
Comments Email Public Comments Drawn Alignment Suggestions 4 February 5, 2024 Item 02
What We Heard
Themes
Additional Technical
Information
Project Development
Process
Consider Other
Alignments
5 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 6
Project Goals
1. Relocate from Bluffs
2. Minimize Community
Impacts
3. Improve Travel Times
– Straighten Curves
– Double Track
4. Coastal Access & Safety
5. Preserve Wetlands
6 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Alignments Previously Identified
| 7
DISCLAIMER: No decision has been made on the selection of the proposed project or project alternatives. SANDAG is continuing to evaluate concepts that may be selected as project alternatives for analysis that will be studied during the formal environmental review process under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. All elements of the conceptual designs are preliminary and should not be construed as an announcement of the intent to acquire any private property. The images are intended to facilitate early public engagement on project concepts. 7 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 8
Alignments from Public Input
DISCLAIMER: No decision has been made on the selection of the proposed project or project alternatives. SANDAG is continuing to evaluate concepts that may be selected as project alternatives for analysis that will be studied during the formal environmental review process under the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. All elements of the conceptual designs are preliminary and should not be construed as an announcement of the intent to acquire any private property. The images are intended to facilitate early public engagement on project concepts. 8 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Project Timeline
Subject to Change
Defining
the Project
Environmental Process
and Studies
2024-2026
Public
Input
Final
Document
Request
BOD
Action
2026
Final
Design*
2026-2028
Construction*
2028-2035
Ongoing Public Outreach
Gathering
Information
2017-2024
Feb 2024
Public
Input
Draft
Document
2017
Planning Study
2023
Alternatives
Analysis
2023-2024
Public Input
Workshops,
Field Office
Hours, Town
Halls
2024
NOP
comment
period
and
Public
scoping
meeting
30 days
2025
Draft
Environmental
Document
(EIR)
Technical
studies and
analysis. Draft
EIR developed
and released
for comment
2026
Final
EIR
Responses
and final
document
released
2024
Notice of
Preparation
(NOP)
developed
and released
for comment
2025
Draft EIR
comment
period
45 days
*Pending Board Approval
and future funding
Right of Way
Acquisition
| 9
Board
Considers
Approval of
Final EIR,
which
determines
final
alignment
9 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 10
CEQA Process Overview
Technical Studies and Analysis
30-Day NOP Comment Period
and Public Scoping Meeting
Notice of Preparation (NOP)
SANDAG Board of Directors
Action on the Project
Final EIR & Responses to
Comments Released for Review
Release of Draft EIR & 45-Day
Public Comment Period
10 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 11
Upcoming Technical Studies
2024-2026
• Environment
— Air Quality and Emissions Reports
— Biological Resource Report
— Electromagnetic Field Study
— Geotechnical and Seismic Technical Study
— Paleontological Report and Mitigation Plan
• Safety
— Overall Safety and Security Report and
Management Plans
— Hazardous Materials Report
• Economic
— Economic and Fiscal Technical Study and
Cost Analysis
— Growth-Inducing Effects Technical Memo
— Cost Benefit Analysis
• Community
— Community Impact Assessments
— Tribal Cultural Reports
— Public Services Technical Memo
— Utilities Technical Study
— Visual Resources Report
— Water Quality and Hydrology Report
— Construction Methods Technical Report
• Land Use
— Right of Way Technical Report
— Cultural Resources Evaluation and Assessment
and Monitoring and Discovery Plan
— Land Use Technical Report
• Mobility
— Transportation Technical Memorandum and
Impact Report
11 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 12
LOSSAN Rail Corridor
Intercity rail connects metropolitan areas over
longer distances than commuter or regional trains.
Source: Amtrak FY23 Ridership Fact Sheet
Top 5 Intercity Passenger Rail Corridors in the U.S.
Corridor FY23 Ridership FY22 Ridership
NEC (NE Regional + Acela) 12,122,466 9,235,720
LOSSAN (Pacific Surfliner) 1,517,425 1,634,087
Empire South 1,244,276 1,019,770
Keystone 1,115,779 806,430
Capitol Corridor 921,112 674,039
12 February 5, 2024 Item 02
| 13
Economic Analysis of LOSSAN in San Diego County
• Increased congestion on I-5 and I-15 (from
freight and passenger being diverted off rail
and into vehicles)
• Job and GDP loss felt across sectors in the
region, including construction, warehousing,
retail trade, and tourism
• Risk of port tenants relocating to another port
for more favorable transportation
Potential results of prolonged interruption
of rail service:
Photo: Mark MacDougall
13 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Interagency Coordination
| 14
14 February 5, 2024 Item 02
FAQs
| 15
When will decisions be made on selecting alternatives and portals? A range of alternatives will be identified in Spring 2024. The final selection of alternatives will occur in 2026. All options are currently on the table.
Are borings and other environmental studies being conducted? • Initial geotechnical borings were conducted in 2021 to support the 2023 Alternatives Analysis study. • Additional geotechnical borings will be done starting Spring 2024. SANDAG will notify the public via email and our website.
Will property need to be acquired as part of the realignment? • It is too early in the planning process to know any specific details. • For information on the real estate process, see the Real Estate and LOSSAN Rail Realignment page on sandag.org/lossan.
Is SANDAG working with other agencies on the LOSSAN Corridor? Yes, SANDAG is an active member of the LOSSAN Agency. We meet regularly with OCTA on issues involving San Clemente.
Will access to the Fairgrounds, local businesses, and emergency services be maintained during construction?
Yes. In fact, most of the construction-related access will be from the south portal, which has direct access to I-5.
15 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Stay connected with SANDAG
Explore our website
www.sandag.org/LOSSAN
Email: [email protected]
Follow us on social media:
@SANDAGregion @SANDAG
858.549.RAIL
16 Look forward to
scoping in Spring 2024!
16 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Troy Williams <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 1:22 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot: Concerns Regarding the Proposed Tunnel Under Del Mar Village Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council Members,
I have previously spoken at SANDAG meetings, and I am writing to reiterate my concerns about the proposed tunnel under the village of Del Mar.
Risk to Life and Property: I am deeply concerned about the potential risks to life and property associated with allowing dangerous freight to be transported at high speeds beneath our homes. On average, there are over 1,000 derailments each year in the US, some of which have had devastating consequences for local residents. A recent incident in Ohio serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers (source).
Eminent Domain: Another significant worry is the potential use of eminent domain on private property. Many individuals' net worth is tied to their homes, and history shows that eminent domain tends to undervalue private property. Additionally, the vibration from drilling/boring may lead to damage in some homes. I am concerned that restitution and compensation, if granted, may take years to materialize, if it occurs at all.
Loss of Small Businesses and Del Mar's Culture: Economic consequences to the small businesses in Del Mar are a third concern. A prolonged construction project disrupting visitors and traffic for 10 to 15 years could lead to the closure of many small businesses. We even witnessed the shuttering of several small businesses during the sidewalk and median beautification project — a very short project in comparison. The unique culture of Del Mar could be irreversibly altered if we lose these cherished restaurants and retail stores.
While I am supportive of the overall goal of relocating the train from the bluffs and improving environmental impact, it is crucial to prioritize the safety of life and property, as well as the preservation of Del Mar's culture. We need to consider alternatives that prioritize these concerns. It is essential to reevaluate the project's objectives and ensure that the focus on removing the train from the bluff and the environmental improvements does not overshadow the more critical priority of safeguarding our community.
I urge the Council to press SANDAG to reconsider and thoroughly evaluate options that prioritize the safety of residents, protect private property, and preserve the unique culture of Del Mar. We should question the necessity of the project itself rather than compromising on matters of utmost importance.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns, and I look forward to a thoughtful and considerate examination of the proposed project.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 Sincerely,
Troy Williams
480 Carolina Rd
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: deftos <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 1:32 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot for Feb 5 City Council Agenda Item 2 LOSSAN PRESENTATION Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar City Council and SANDAG Representatives,
Seawalls and other infrastructure will be installed to stabilize the current railroad tracks on the bluff.
While it is anticipated that these will be removed when the tracks are ultimately removed from the bluff, the Coastal Commission has required this infrastructure to be engineered to have structural stability for at least 30 years (until June 2052). The Coastal Commission has also allowed for an extension of the time the infrastructure remains in place if this is necessary. If sand depletion on our beaches becomes an issue, sand replenishment is a possible short-term solution. This provides more than ample time to figure out a long-term solution (and secure funding for this) that does not destroy Del Mar, that protects the environment, that adequately meets the expected transportation needs of the future (which might be less than today due to an anticipated decline in the population of Southern California per projections from the California Department of Finance), and that addresses all of the problems of the LOSSAN Corridor in Southern California (e.g. San Clemente, Del Mar, Miramar). Instead of taking the time to respond to our concerns and coming up with a comprehensive solution, it seems that SANDAG is ramming this down our throats and is indifferent to the residents of Del Mar.
Michael Deftos
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Vaughn Sammartino <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 2:24 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Written Statement 2/5/24 SANDAG LOSSAN Rail Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Public comment from Margarita Wilkinson, candidate for 49th district of US Congress:
As a resident of north county San Diego and a long-term homeowner in Del Mar, I have been closely watching developments of the $4 billion Del Mar tunnel project, the biggest in SANDAG history.
I have significant concerns about SANDAG’s honesty and transparency with this project, among others in SANDAG’s history.
As a candidate for Congress, I am strongly opposed to wasting any federal taxpayer money on this massive boondoggle. I am strongly opposed to the county-wide SANDAG sales tax measure being proposed to fund this project. I will have zero tolerance for anyone who attempts to defraud federal taxpayers with projects like this. I am running for Congress to restore fiscal sanity and accountability to Washington DC, and we can start by denying this dead-on-arrival project and investigating any deceptive claims from SANDAG to obtain federal funding.
Margarita Wilkinson
vote4margarita.com
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: John Daley <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2024 4:08 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Tunnel issues
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
My wife and I have lived in our home here in Del Mar for more than 25 years. We are concerned that planned realignment of the railroad tracks may cause damage to our home, and otherwise diminish the quality of our life in so many ways that would negatively impact the use and quiet enjoyment of our home and the city itself.
Attached below is a statement of issues that we believe need to be addressed.
John Daley and Page duBois
1. No tunnel under Del Mar or any homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. No freight trains under people’s homes (no danger of toxic or chemical spills, or nuclear ammunitions in
tunnels under our beds or the house next door).
We are demanding from SANDAG an Engineering
Design that achieves those three objectives. Make sure
the Environmental Tunnel under Fairgrounds/Lagoon
Alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study.
OUR PRIORITIES:
1. TRAIN OFF THE BLUFFS
2. SLOPE LESS THAN 2% GRADE (for freight)
3. ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE (two lagoons will be
saved)
4. NO IMPACT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY (NOISE,
VIBRATION, SINK HOLES, AIR POLLUTION)
5. NO DIGGING UNDER HOMES
6. NO FREIGHT TRAINS UNDER PEOPLE’S HOMES
7. SPEED DOES NOT NEED TO BE 110MPH (there are
many 90 degree turns and low speeds on the NEW rail
lines in Orange and LA county)
THE ONLY WAY TO PROVE THIS IS A VIABLE OPTION IS
TO DO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN TO SHOW THE PROS
AND CONS. FOR $300M SANDAG CAN INCLUDE THIS
COMMON SENSE OPTION THAT DOES NOT DESTROY
THE TOWN OF DEL MAR, TAKE PEOPLE’S HOMES AND
CRIPPLE BUSINESS, AND ACCESS.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 BNSF Freight train exhaust caused a Tunnel Fire in
Columbia River Gauge, Washington. People lost homes
and 100’s of acres of land. The magnitude of loss of
homes for these people is huge!
Sent from my iPad
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Council Member Quirk Questions & Comments
For SANDAG Rail Realignment Presentation at Del
Mar City Council, February 5, 2024
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Is this the second busiest intercity rail corridor?
SANDAG is now redefining this to exclude all rail lines except Amtrak lines. Amtrak accounts for only 0.6% of rail trips in the United States. 99.4% of rail trips in the U.S. are not Amtrak. 2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Ridership of select rail lines compared to LOSSAN lines demonstrates the low LOSSAN ridership.
3 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Ridership of All Passenger Lines Compared to LOSSAN Lines 4 February 5, 2024 Item 02
SANDAG’s Mid-Coast Trolley Project Profile with DoT shows a cost of $2.112 billion and expected ridership of 34,700 daily trips. The project cost per trip translates to $60,000.
The Del Mar tunnel project will cost $4 billion and has a current ridership of approximately 4,500 daily trips. The project cost per trip translates to about $900,000.
Given these metrics and even bigger problems in San Clemente, why does SANDAG think this project will get federal funding? What will the Government Accountability Office (GAO)do? https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/CA_San_Diego_Mid_Coast_Corridor_Engineering_Project_Profile.pdf 5 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Is SANDAG aware of the “force majeure” and “cost sharing” language in the 1992 contract with BNSF? Why should taxpayers cover 100% of the capital cost of the Del Mar tunnel project if it has such a significant benefit for freight operations?
6 February 5, 2024 Item 02
Has SANDAG spoke with Dan Zedack, from the Department of defense? Is SANDAG aware that the port of San Diego’s participation in the military strategic seaports program is voluntary? Is SANDAG aware that the military’s shipments along the LOSSAN rail corridor to the port of San Diego only amounts to a few trains per year? Is SANDAG aware that Camp Pendleton’s annual rail shipments average about 2,000 tons, which is significantly less than a full train’s amount? 7 February 5, 2024 Item 02
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jonnell Agnew <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2024 5:27 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: sandag
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am voicing my opinion that sandag should not even consider digging a tunnel under Camino Del Mar, the street or under any homes or businesses. They have another viable route which is away from homes and the village in short I have put in bullet points.
1. NO tunnel under Del Mar or any of their homes
2. No eminent domain of private property
3. NO freight trains under people’s homes, no danger of toxic or chemical spills or nuclear ammunions in tunnels under our beds or the house next door
4. We are demanding from Sandag an engineering design that achieves those three objecves. Make sure the environmental tunnel under fairgrounds/lagoon alignment to I-5 is included in the EIS study Our priories:
1 train off bluffs
2. slope less than 2 percent grade for freight
3. no impact to private property, such as noise, vibraon, sink holes air polluon
4. no freight trains under homes
5. speed does not need to be 110 mph.
Freight train exhaust caused a tunnel fire in Columbia river gauge, Washington. People lost homes and 100s of acres of land.
Sincerely,
Jonnell Agnew, CSR 5437,
Registered Professional Reporter 453
Jonnell Agnew & Associates
304 W. Sierra Madre Blvd. Sierra Madre, CA 91024
626-568-9854 CELL 626-483-8552
Serving the legal community over 42 years
Don’t ask how old I am.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 02
2 Court reporters/Videographers/Interpreters/Transcribers Conference rooms/ Videoconference center/Zoom depos
[email protected]
www.jonnellagnewcourtreporters.com
2 February 5, 2024 Item 02
City of Del Mar
Memorandum
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager
DATE: February 5, 2024
SUBJECT: Red Dot Item 3: Approval of Minutes: January 22, 2024 Regular and Special Meeting
This Red Dot is to amend the Regular and Special Meeting Minutes for January 22, 2024 to reflect that Mayor Druker called both meetings to order and to clarify the next steps for Item 7 as shown below in redline/strike out.
ITEM 7: DISCUSSION OF DRAFT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND POLICY DIRECTION FOR SHORT TERM RENTAL REGULATION (CLERK’S FILE NO. 301-19)
As a next step, staff will return to the City Council with an updated draft of the STR regulatory framework (proposed code language) including additional policy options and information related to LLC ownership and property title requirements. Staff would then prepare finalize a draft ordinance, complete California Environmental Quality Act review and hold a public hearing of the Planning Commission, and return to the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission and formal STR ordinance for Council consideration.
1 February 5, 2024 Item 03