Agenda, regular meeting, second session — Del Mar City Council, June 3, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

Table of Contents
6-3-2024 Regular Meeting Agenda.pdf
Item 3 - Minutes.pdf
Item 4 - List of Demands.pdf
Item 6 - Agenda Report - Conflict of Interest Code.pdf
Item 7 - Agenda Report - UPAC Recommended Appointment.pdf Item 8 - Trailer Purchase Agenda Report 2024.pdf
Item 9 - SD Pump Station Parts Purchase Agenda Report 2024.pdf Item 10 - Agenda Report - SB 1.pdf
Item 11 - Summer Preparations.pdf
Item 12 - Agreement with TPA for State and Fed Leg Advocacy Services.pdf Item 13 - Living Levee Design Concept.pdf
Item 14 - Agenda Report - RP3 Update.pdf
Item 15 - UP Update and UUD 3 Pre-Formation Services Task Order.pdf Item 16 - Budget Update Preliminary Report.pdf
Items XII- A, F; XIII-E -Council Liaison Report from Dwight Worden.pdf 2 9
17 33
49 57
62 68
94 103
123
193
199
215
238
Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda
City of Del Mar, Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us Civility Works: The Del Mar Code of Civil Discourse: Together we will promote inclusion; listen to understand; show respect; be clear and fair; and focus on the issue.

Regular Meeting
Monday, June 3, 2024 at 4:30 PM
Public Participation/Comment: Members of the public can participate in City Council meetings in-person or via written comment (Red Dot). Anyone may address the City Council for up to three minutes, at the Mayor’s discretion, on items on the agenda.

Members of the public wishing to speak on items not on the agenda may do so under Public Oral Communications. Agenda items may be addressed in any order at the discretion of the Mayor. When addressing the Council, please state your name for the record. Any electronic presentations must be received before 9 a.m. on the date of the Council meeting. No PowerPoint presentations can be loaded during the meeting.

In-Person Participation: Please submit a completed “Speaker Slip”, including the item number you wish to speak on, to the City Clerk prior to the Mayor announcing the agenda item. The forms are located near the door at the rear of the Meeting Room. When called to speak, please approach the podium and state your name for the record.

Written Comments: Members of the public can participate in the meeting by submitting a written red dot comment via email to [email protected]. The deadline to submit written comments is 12 p.m. on the day of the meeting and the subject line of your email should clearly state the agenda item you are commenting on.

Remote Participation: Due to technical issues, remote
participation will not be offered at this City Council meeting.

Viewing the Meeting and Access to Agenda Materials: Members of the public can watch the meeting live on the City’s website at: http://delmar.12milesout.com/Video/Live and on Cable TV Spectrum Ch. 24, AT&T Ch. 99 starting at 4:30 PM. Agenda materials and communications from the public on agenda items, “Red Dots”, are available on the City’s website:
http://www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter and a hard copy of the agenda materials are available at Del Mar City Hall and the Del Mar Library during their business hours.

Assistance for Persons with Disabilities: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Administrative Services Department at 1050 Camino del Mar or by calling (858) 755-9313.

Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Dave Druker
Mayor
Terry Gaasterland
Deputy Mayor
Tracy Martinez
Council Member
Dan Quirk
Council Member
Dwight Worden
Council Member
Ashley Jones
City Manager
Leslie E. Devaney
City Attorney
Sarah Krietor
Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 2
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us I. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
II. CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
IV. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Each person wishing to speak before the City Council on any matter not on the agenda shall submit a “Speaker Slip” to the City Clerk when Public Oral Communication is announced. Each speaker will have up to three (3) minutes to speak at the discretion of the Mayor and may be asked clarifying questions. Information received during Public Oral Communication may be received, placed on a future agenda, or referred to the City Manager by the City Council. State law generally precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic presented during oral communications that is not described on the posted agenda.

Note: there is a time limit of 30 minutes for this section of public communications and each speaker will be heard in the order of the submission of their speaker slip. Speakers who have turned in a speaker slip prior to the time oral communications was called on the agenda, but were not heard during the initial time period shall be called to speak at the end of the agenda.

V. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
VI. COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
VII. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
VIII. PRESENTATIONS

1. Girl Scout Troops 3917 & 3224 Bronze Award Presentation Recommended Action: Receive a presentation from Girl Scout Troops 3917 & 3224 related to installation of a succulent kiosk at the Del Mar Civic Center.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 507-1, 1202-3

2. Proclamation Honoring Mark Rathsam's 30 Years of Service to Del Mar Recommended Action: Mayor Druker will present proclamation to Mark Rathsam.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1201-5
IX. CONSENT CALENDAR
All items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be acted upon with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 3
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us member of the City Council or the public so requests, in which event, the item will be pulled from the Consent Calendar and considered separately after the motion to approve the Consent Calendar. If you wish to remove an item from the Consent Calendar, please submit a “Speaker Slip” to the City Clerk.

3. Approval of Minutes: May 20, 2024 Regular and Special Meeting Recommended Action: Approve Minutes.

Reference: Clerk’s Minutes Book

4. Ratification of List of Demands, dated June 3, 2024.

Recommended Action: Ratify the List of Demands.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 201-3

5. Waiver of Reading of Ordinances on Agenda
Recommended Action: Waive Reading of Ordinances.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-4

6. Biennial Review and Update of the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive this report and adopt the Resolution (Attachment A) incorporating revisions to the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code (Exhibit A to Attachment A) to reflect changes in staff positions.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 404-6

7. Appointment to the Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee (UPAC) Recommended Action: The Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee (UPAC) Council liaisons recommend that the City Council appoint Robert (Bob) Preston as a voting member to the committee to serve a full three-year term starting June 3, 2024, and ending on June 30, 2027.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-5

8. Purchase of Equipment Trailer from Sonsray Machinery Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council approve the purchase of a trailer from Sonsray Machinery in the total amount of $16,000 (Attachment A); and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary paperwork to purchase the trailer.

Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 4
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us Reference: Clerk’s File No. 601-5

9. Purchase of Replacement Parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station from Environmental Water Solutions, Inc.

Recommended Action: Staff Recommends that City Council approve the purchase of replacement parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station from Environmental Water Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $16,490 (Attachment A); and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary paperwork to facilitate the purchase.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 601-5, 907-5

10. Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Senate Bill 1 Funding for the City’s Annual Pavement Management Program
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) adopting the list of projects that includes the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Citywide Annual Pavement Management Program to be funded by Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) from the State of California.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 901-5

11. Del Mar Annual Preparations for Summer Season
Recommended Action: Staff requests that the City Council receive a report on the City’s annual preparations for the upcoming summer season.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1101-1, 1404-1,1502-10

12. Agreement with Townsend Public Affairs for Legislative Advocacy Services Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Townsend Public Affairs (Attachment A) to provide state and federal legislative advocacy services for an initial three-year period effective June 3, 2024, through June 2, 2027; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any subsequent extensions allowed for under the Agreement based on satisfactory performance.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 401-7, 401-8, 406-1
X. COUNCIL MEETING RECESS
XI. CITY COUNCIL OTHER BUSINESS
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 5
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us

13. Preliminary Conceptual Plan for Living Levees to Provide Flood Adaptation Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council receive the report from City consultant, Moffatt & Nichol (Attachment A) identifying a Preliminary Conceptual Plan for potential living levees that can provide flood adaptation along the San Dieguito River in accordance with the City’s Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan (Environmental Science Associates 2018).

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1404-1, 1404-2

14. Riverpath Del Mar Extension Project Phase 3 Project Update Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the status of Riverpath Del Mar Extension Project Phase 3.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 803-3

15. Undergrounding Program Update and Task Order Approval for Utility Specialists Southwest, Inc. to Perform Utility Underground District (UUD) Pre-Formation Services for UUD 3 (South Hill)
Recommended Action: Staff recommends the City Council: 1) Receive an update regarding the City’s Undergrounding Program; 2) Approve a $84,810 Task Order (Attachment A) with Utility Specialists Southwest, Inc. to perform utility underground district (UUD) pre-formation services for UUD 3 (South Hill); and 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Task Order and make amendments by up to $8,490 for extended consulting services.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 1001-2

16. Review Fiscal Year 2023-24 Third Quarter and Proposed 2024-25 Operating and Capital Budget Update
Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Review and provide feedback on the proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 Third Quarter Adjustments and FY 2024-25 Budget Update Report; 2) Approve the reclassification of the Community Services Administrative Assistant and Public Works Project Manager II as described in this report; and 3) Approve Resolution (Attachment A) amending the FY 2023-24 Operating and Capital Budget as included in Exhibit A of Attachment A.

Reference: Clerk’s File No. 202-3, 202-5
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 6
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us XII. REGIONAL ORGANIZATION REPORTS
A Councilmember assigned as a liaison to a regional organization may make a written or oral report. State law precludes the Council from commenting on, discussing, or acting on a report unless the item of business within the report is described in the agenda.

A. 22nd District Agricultural Association Community Relations Committee (Martinez/Worden)
Recommended Action: Receive written report (Worden).

B. Clean Energy Alliance JPA (CEA) Board of Directors (Druker/Worden) C. CSA-17 Ambulance District Advisory Board (Martinez/Quirk) D. Fire Governance Board, Solana Beach/Del Mar/Encinitas (Martinez/Druker) E. League of California Cities – San Diego Chapter (Martinez/Worden) F. League of California Cities – Coastal Cities Group (Worden) Recommended Action: Receive written report (Worden).

G. North County Transit District (NCTD) (Martinez/Druker) H. Regional Solid Waste Association (Worden/Quirk)
I. San Diego Association of Governments Board (SANDAG)
(Gaasterland/Martinez/Druker)
J. SANDAG Borders Committee (Gaasterland)
K. SANDAG Regional Planning Committee (Martinez)
L. SANDAG Shoreline Preservation Working Group
(Worden/Gaasterland/Martinez)
M. SANDAG LOSSAN Executive Task Force (Druker/Gaasterland) N. San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Commission/JPA (Worden/Quirk/Druker) O. San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Space Park JPA –Executive Committee (Worden/Quirk)
P. Other Regional Organization Reports
XIII. COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES/COMMUNITY ORG REPORTS A Councilmember assigned as a liaison to a City Committee, Council Subcommittee or Community Organization may make a written or oral report. State law precludes the Council from commenting on, discussing, or acting on a report, unless the item of business within the report is described in this agenda.

A. Arts Advisory Committee (Druker)
B. Clean Water Rate Project
C. Del Mar Community Connections (Martinez/Worden)
D. Del Mar Village Association (Gaasterland/Martinez)
E. Finance Committee (Druker/Worden)
Recommended Action: Receive written report (Worden).

F. Housing Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
G. Human Resources Subcommittee (Druker/Worden)
H. Legislative Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
I. Measure Q Citizen Oversight Committee (Gaasterland/Quirk) J. Parks and Recreation Committee (Martinez/Gaasterland) K. Del Mar Railroad Committee (Druker/Gaasterland)
L. Lagoon Committee (Quirk/Worden)
M. Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan Implementation Subcommittee (Gaasterland/Martinez)
N. Shores Advisory Committee
Del Mar City Council Regular Meeting June 3, 2024
Agenda Page 7
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, CA 92014 www.delmar.ca.us O. Sustainability Advisory Committee (Martinez/Worden)
P. Traffic and Parking Advisory Committee (Quirk/Worden) Q. Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee (Druker/Gaasterland) R. Other Committee-Subcommittee Reports
XIV. UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
The following topics/items are tentatively planned for upcoming agendas. The title, wording, and planned date for these items are subject to change. Final agendas are posted at City Hall 72 hours in advance of the meetings and are also posted on our web site with the accompanying staff report. Please watch our web site:
www.delmar.ca.us for City Council Agendas.

June 17, 2024
Proclamation Honoring Mary Sterling-Torretti for 35 Years of Service to the Winston School Proclamation Honoring Pat Freeman Friends of the Del Mar Library Annual Fire Inspection Report
St. Peters License Agreement
Jimmy Durante Boulevard Bluff Repair Project, Structural Engineering and Landscape Architecture Task Order Authorizations
San Dieguito Drive Close of Balloting, Tabulation of Ballots, and Resolution Ordering Levies Introduction of Ordinance for Objective Design Standards Manual for Multi-unit/Mixed-Use By Right Projects
Council Discussion on SANDAG Rail Realignment Project NOP and Letter Requesting an Extension of Time (60 days)
Adoption of the FY 2024-2025 Operating and Capital Budget Update Ballot Measure TOT Resolution and Introduction of Ordinance/ Revenue Forecasting and Specify Council to Draft Argument
Council Compensation Ballot Measure Resolution and Ordinance and Specify Council to Draft Argument
XV. CERTIFICATION
I, Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk for the City of Del Mar, hereby certify that a copy of this agenda was posted at City Hall on the 30th day of May, 2024 at approximately 8:00 a.m.
___________________________________________ 5/30/2024
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/ Date
City Clerk

DEL MAR CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

CLOSED SESSION
MAY 20, 2024
City of Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Druker called the meeting to order at 3:15 P.M.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Dave Druker; Deputy Mayor Terry Gaasterland (from 3:15 P.M. to 3:25 P.M. and absent for the remainder of the meeting due to a work conflict); Councilmembers Tracy Martinez, and Dwight Worden

Absent: Councilmember Dan Quirk

CLOSED SESSION
A) Conference with Legal Counsel - Significant Exposure to Litigation Number of Cases: Two
Description: 1) Short Term Rental Regulations; and 2) Transient Occupancy Tax Regulations
Authority: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
Reportable Action: None.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Druker adjourned the meeting at 4:25 P.M.
______________________________________
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/
City Clerk
1 June 3, 2024 Item 03

CITY OF DEL MAR

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
MAY 20, 2024
City of Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar California 92014
The minutes set forth the actions taken by the City Council on the matters stated. Audio/video recordings of the City Council proceedings are retained for a period of ten years, in accordance with the City's Records Retention Schedule. Audio/video recordings, as well as written materials presented to the City Council, including Red Dots (materials provided to the City Council after the agenda has published), are available on the City’s website at www.delmar.ca.us/AgendaCenter or by contacting the Administrative Services Department at (858) 755-9313.

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Druker called the Regular Meeting to order at 4:30 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Present: Mayor Dave Druker; Deputy Mayor Terry Gaasterland; Councilmembers Tracy Martinez, Dan Quirk, and Dwight Worden

CITY ATTORNEY CLOSED SESSION REPORT
City Attorney Leslie Devaney reported that there were no recusals or reportable actions for the May 20, 2024, City Council Closed Session meeting. Councilmember Quirk was absent from Closed Session and Deputy Mayor Gaasterland was present only for the first 10 minutes of Closed Session due to a work conflict.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Deputy Mayor Gaasterland led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Druker opened public oral communication and Ellen Burr spoke regarding San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the North County Transit District (NCTD). Mayor Druker closed public oral communication.

CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS & COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
Councilmember Worden reported on the Oceans at Our Door Step event held on May 15, 2024, sponsored by the Coalition for Climate Change in Del Mar; SANDAG Bike to Work Day event held on May 16, 2024; Assembly Bill 2560 related to the State’s density bonus law and the California Coastal Act; Ocean Protection Council releasing the final draft of their Sea-Level Rise Guidance on May 28, 2024, that will become the guidance that California Coastal Commission uses moving forward; and the death of local artist James Hubble who created the sculpture at the Del Mar Library. Deputy Mayor Gaasterland commented on the SANDAG Bluff 5 construction and concerns about the base fill being used behind the seawalls and the University of California strike.

CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Ashley Jones responded to Council comments related to the SANDAG Bluff 5 project and reported on an upcoming construction site walk with City staff, the Council Rail Subcommitte, and 2 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 2 of 7 ends

SANDAG staff; and reported on Public Works Week which will be celebrated on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, at the Public Works Yard.

PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1: PRESENTATION ON THE 2024 SAN DIEGO COUNTY FAIR (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1502- 10)
A presentation was provided by Del Mar Fairgrounds Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Carlene Moore.

City Council comments focused on appreciation to Del Mar Fairgrounds CEO Carlene Moore for her presentation and essential revenue the Fair generates for the City of Del Mar.

There were no public speakers for the item.

ITEM 2: PROCLAMATION DECLARING JUNE 12TH AS SAN DIEGO COUNTY FAIR DAY (CLERK’S FILE NO. 1201-5, 1502-10)
Mayor Druker presented a proclamation to Fairgrounds CEO Carlene Moore, declaring June 12, as San Diego County Fair Day in Del Mar.

There were no public speakers for the item.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk Sarah Krietor read the titles of the items included on the Consent Calendar. There were no public speakers for the consent calendar items.

IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WORDEN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 3 THROUGH 7, AND ITEM 9, WITH AMENDMENT TO ITEM 6 READ INTO THE RECORD. (VOTE 5-0) Ayes: Mayor Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, and Councilmembers Martinez, Quirk and Worden; Noes: 0; Recuse: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain: 0.

ITEM 3: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MAY 6, 2024 REGULAR AND SPECIAL MEETING (CLERK’S MINUTES BOOK)
Council approved the minutes, on consent.

ITEM 4: RATIFICATION OF LIST OF DEMANDS, DATED MAY 20, 2024 (CLERK’S FILE NO. 201-3)
Council approved the list of demands, on consent.

ITEM 5: WAIVER OF READING OF ORDINANCES ON AGENDA (CLERK’S FILE NO. 401-4) Council waived the reading of ordinances, on consent.

ITEM 6: AGREEMENT FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES (CLERK’S FILE NO. 406-1) 3 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 3 of 7 ends

Council approved an Agreement with Aztec Janitorial Service to provide citywide janitorial services for an initial three-year period effective June 1, 2024, through May 31, 2027; and authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement and any subsequent term extension amendments provided for under the Agreement contingent upon satisfactory performance by the contractor, on consent.

ITEM 7: SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER

21.12 – WATER SUPPLY – WATER RATES AND CHARGES; CHAPTER 21.70 – EMERGENCY WATER MANAGEMENT; AND CHAPTER 22.04 – GENERAL (SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL) OF THE DEL MAR MUNICIPAL CODE (CLERK’S FILE NO. 401-4, 401-9, 907-4)
Council adopted Ordinance 1008, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE DEL MAR MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 21.12 – WATER SUPPLY – WATER RATES AND CHARGES, CHAPTER

21.70 – EMERGENCY WATER MANAGEMENT, CHAPTER 22.04 - SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL – GENERAL”, to establish new water and wastewater rates, effective July 1, 2024, on consent.

ITEM 8: CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT FOR THE CAMPAIGN FOR A SAFE AND HEALTHY CALIFORNIA IN COMPLIANCE WITH SENATE BILL 1137 (GONZALEZ) (CLERK’S FILE NO. 401-7)
The item was pulled from the consent calendar for public comment. Mayor Druker opened the item to public speakers and the following individuals spoke in support:
1) Sofia Carrasco
2) Taarika Sethee
3) Daryn Tarasweicz
4) Charlotte Sach
5) Allison Lee
Mayor Druker closed the item to public comment.

Council discussion focused on the proposed legislation; appreciation to the students of Youth v. Oil for bringing the item forward; and support for communities outside of Del Mar.

IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WORDEN, SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER MARTINEZ TO ADOPTED RESOLUTION 2024-21, “A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA IN

SUPPORT OF RETAINING HEALTH AND SAFETY SETBACK REGULATIONS FOR

NEW OIL AND GAS DRILLING AND ENDORSING THE CAMPAIGN FOR A SAFE AND HEALTHY CALIFORNIA”, in compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 1137. (VOTE 4-0-1

WITH COUNCILMEMBER QUIRK ABSTAINED)
Ayes: Mayor Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, and Councilmembers Martinez and Worden; Noes: 0; Recuse: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain: Councilmember Quirk.

ITEM 9: RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A 2024 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION (CLERK’S FILE NO. 402-1, 402-3)
4 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 4 of 7 ends

Council adopted RESOLUTION 2024-18, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2024, FOR THE ELECTION OF

CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES”, RESOLUTION 2024- 19, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL MAR,

CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF

SAN DIEGO TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2024, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE”, and RESOLUTION 2024-20, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2024”, in preparation for a November 5, 2024, General Municipal Election, on consent.

COUNCIL MEETING RECESS:

The City Council took a meeting recess from approximately 8:25 to 8:30 p.m.

CITY COUNCIL OTHER BUSINESS
ITEM 10: COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 1098 (BLAKESPEAR) REGARDING THE LOSSAN RAIL CORRIDOR (CLERK’S FILE NO. 401-7) An introduction to the item was provided by Mayor Druker and City Manager Jones. A presentation was provided by Principal Consultant Alex Davis from California State Senator Catherine Blakespear’s office.

Council questions focused on LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency’s responsibilities as they relate to Senate Bill 1098 (SB 1098); compliance reporting included in the proposed legislation; rail ridership; federal funding and cost benefit analysis for projects receiving federal funding; recent amendments to the legislation described in the staff red dot; and meaning of planning stage phrasing used in the legislation.

There were no public speakers for the item.

Council discussion focused on working groups and hearings held in Orange County by the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency; train ridership; importance of the LOSSAN Rail Corridor; metric of cost versus ridership and government accountability; potential for ridership numbers to increase; appreciation to Alex Davis for presenting on this item; and support for legislation providing coordination amongst agencies in the LOSSAN Rail Corridor.

IT WAS MOVED BY MAYOR DRUKER, SECONDED BY DEPUTY MAYOR GAASTERLAND TO APPROVE SENDING A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 1098 (VOTE 4-1, WITH

COUNCILMEMBER QUIRK OPPOSED)
Ayes: Mayor Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, and Councilmembers Martinez, and Worden; Noes:

Councilmember Quirk; Recuse: 0; Absent: 0; Abstain: 0.

ITEM 11: DISCUSSION OF DRAFT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND POLICY DIRECTION FOR SHORT TERM RENTAL REGULATIONS (CLERK’S FILE NO. 301-19) 5 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 5 of 7 ends

A presentation was provided by Principal Planner Amanda Lee and Assistant City Attorney Wendy House.

Mayor Druker opened the item to public comment and the following people spoke:
1) Laura DeMarco with donations of time from Gina Mattern and Jennifer McDowell 2) Steven McDowell
3) Jerry Pascale
4) Ed Kurdziel
5) Lauren Rones
6) Kimberly Jackson
7) Ken Assi
8) Linda Watts
9) Don Instone
10) Anthony Gattineri
Mayor Druker closed the item to public comment.

Council questions focused on proposed regulation related to transfer of property among family members; transient occupancy tax; whether future Councils can adjust and evolve the Short-Term Rental (STR) regulations; definition of non-hosted and hosted STRs; number of hosted STRs in Del Mar; whether a sentence referencing recent increase of STRs included in the proposed regulatory framework can be removed; discretionary inspections included in the proposed regulatory framework; changing perspective of the CCC related to long-term housing and STRs; recent CCC approvals of STR regulations for other agencies; permitting process for new STRs; Home Owners Association (HOA) regulations and how they relate to the City’s proposed STR regulatory framework; how complaints will be handled; census identified housing vacancy rate; and purpose of the primary residence requirement for new STRs.

Council discussion focused on the history of STRs in Del Mar; enforcement and good neighbor policies; flexibility for future Council’s to adjust regulations, as needed; appreciation to staff for their work on the item; primary residence requirement for new STRs and related CCC requirements; nexus between STR regulations and state housing law; clarification on the recommended action; consideration of a sunset date for existing STRs to come into compliance with regulations for new STRs; acceptable documentation of primary residence for new STRs; rational for including LLC and excluding LLP from acceptable types of ownership; encouraging members of the public to submit their comments or concerns related to STR regulations; rational for the proposed cap; appreciation to the public for their input and engagement regarding development of regulations; and desire for staff to look into Coastal Del Ray HOA STRs.

ITEM 12: CONSIDERATION TO PLACE A GENERAL TAX MEASURE ON THE NOVEMBER 5, 2024 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION BALLOT FOR SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S

EXISTING TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REGULATIONS AND AUTHORIZING

COLLECTION OF TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX FROM SHORT-TERM RENTALS (CLERK’S FILE NO. 201-10, 402-1, 402-3)
An introduction to the item was provided by City Manager Jones. A presentation was provided by Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk Sarah Krietor and Finance Manager/Treasurer Monica Molina. Assistant City Attorney Wendy House was available to answer questions.

Council questions focused on records provided to the City by hotels when TOT is remitted to the City; rational for recommending a ballot measure versus the Council amending the TOT ordinance; where the definition of hotel currently in the code may have originated; implementation costs associated with taxing STRs; desire not to apply and collect TOT on booking fees paid to third-party hosting platforms; voting 6 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 6 of 7 ends

requirements to place the measure on the ballot and for the measure to be approved; requirement for a super majority vote if Council earmarks the revenue for a certain purpose; consideration to allocate excess revenue to a special purpose by resolution; whether TOT would apply to 941 Camino del Mar; and whether the City can be cost-neutral for STR regulations without collecting TOT.

Mayor Druker opened the item to public comment and the following people spoke:
1) Laura DeMarco with a donation of time from Ed Kurdziel 2) Jennifer McDowell
3) Gina Mattern
4) Jerry Pascale
5) Lauren Rones
6) Kimberly Jackson
7) Jennifer McDowell
Mayor Druker closed the item to public comment.

Council consensus was to proceed with the ballot measure and for staff to return with more information related to booking fees, resort fees, and the ballot measure process and timeline related to ballot arguments and rebuttals.

ITEM 13: CONCERNS RELATED TO STATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (EDD) JOBS DATA AND DEL MAR 6TH CYCLE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT (RHNA) ALLOCATION (CLERK’S FILE NO. 303-1)
Mayor Druker introduced the item. A presentation was provided by Deputy Mayor Gaasterland and Councilmember Martinez.

Mayor Druker opened the item to public comment and the following people spoke:
1) Greg Rothnem with a donation of time from Deb Rothnem 2) John Spelich
3) Karen Lare
4) Jeff Sturgis
Mayor Druker closed the item to public comment.

Council discussion focused on the avenues the City previously pursued or considered to address these concerns including tracking and monitoring RHNA litigation initiated by other agencies, seeking a second and possibly a third legal opinion, working with Del Mar legislative representatives to pursue a legislative fix; concerns about the accuracy of the EDD data used by SANDAG to develop the City’s RHNA allocation; concerns and considerations related to revising the City’s Housing and HCD approved Housing Element; additional information the City has acquired from EDD and SANDAG related to how the RHNA job numbers were calculated.

Council consensus was for Deputy Mayor Gaasterland and Councilmember Martinez to work with staff to bring back a proposal exploring additional actions the City may take including seeking a second outside legal opinion, developing a statement about what Del Mar believes the job numbers and RHNA allocation should have been; mechanism for ensuring that Del Mar job numbers are accurately reflected in the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, and having additional follow-up on this topic with SANDAG staff.

REGIONAL ORGANIZATION AND COUNCIL COMMITTEES/SUBCOMMITTEES/COMMUNITY

ORGANIZATION REPORTS
7 June 3, 2024 Item 03
City Council Regular Minutes
May 20, 2024

Page 7 of 7 ends

City Council representatives reported on the Del Mar Community Connections; Lagoon Committee; Sustainability Advisory Committee; League of California Cities- Coastal Cities; Local Government Working Group; SANDAG Sediment Management Taskforce; Parks and Recreation Committee; CSA-17 Ambulance Committee; and NCTD.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Druker adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m.
__
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
8 June 3, 2024 Item 03
1 June 3, 2024 Item 04
05/16/2024
Check List
City of Del Mar
1 4:05:47PM
apChkLst Final Page:

Bank : eusbnk EFT GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 5904 5/17/2024 cor23 CORODATA SHREDDING INC DN 1467557 4/30/2024 SHREDDING SRVCS 195.00 195.00 Voucher: 5904
5905 5/17/2024 dix01 DIXIELINE LUMBER CO 06-0551780 4/30/2024 CONCRETE SUPP PW 99.91 Voucher: 5905 11-0456565 5/2/2024 PAINT SUPPLIES CS 33.23 133.14 5906 5/17/2024 fer07 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES LLC, DBA FERGUSON WATERWORKS 0851720 4/23/2024 WATER METER PARTS 43.50 43.50 Voucher: 5906
5907 5/17/2024 hel04 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING123005 4/26/2024 RIVER PATH ENV ENG PHASE 3 APR 11,800.00 11,800.00 Voucher: 5907
5908 5/17/2024 lou01 LOUKELTON DISTRIBUTING INC 81273 5/6/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 958.65 Voucher: 5908 81065 3/4/2024 JANITORIAL SUPP PW 910.61 1,869.26 5909 5/17/2024 man12 MANERI TRAFFIC CONTROL INC, DBA MTC 21434 5/6/2024 CUTSOM TRAFFIC SIGNS 65.25 65.25 Voucher: 5909
5910 5/17/2024 nex03 NEXTREQUEST CO. 301320 7/1/2024 REDACTION MODULE FY25 6,031.35 6,031.35 Voucher: 5910
5911 5/17/2024 sol06 SOLANA CENTER FOR ENV 40-45-4-24 5/10/2024 SB1383 SERVICES APR 2,249.11 2,249.11 Voucher: 5911
5912 5/17/2024 uni29 UNIVERSAL SITE SERVICES INC 107658 3/15/2024 CH GARAGE SWEEPING MAR 160.00 Voucher: 5912 100761 1/29/2024 CH GARAGE SWEEPING JAN 160.00 320.00 5913 5/17/2024 uti01 UTILITY SPECIALISTS INC 26444 4/30/2024 UP- X1A CREST MAR 86,717.50 Voucher: 5913 26443 4/30/2024 UP- 1A STRATFORD MAR 17,017.00 26446 4/30/2024 UP- 2B BEACH COLONY MAR 13,572.50
26445 4/30/2024 UP- 1B STRATFORD MAR 13,246.50
26447 4/30/2024 UP- 1B STRATFORD MAR 127.60 130,681.10
5914 5/17/2024 wex01 WEX BANK 96977968 5/6/2024 GAS & OIL PW APR 3,898.54 3,898.54 Voucher: 5914
Sub total for EFT GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK: 157,286.25
Page: 1
2 June 3, 2024 Item 04
05/16/2024
Check List
City of Del Mar
2 4:05:47PM
apChkLst Final Page:

Bank : gusbnk GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 138213 5/17/2024 sbc03 AT&T 000021640516 5/1/2024 TELEPHONE APR 416.03 416.03 Voucher: 138213
138214 5/17/2024 bar32 BARMAZEL, MARC Ref000175392 5/9/2024 UB Refund Cst #00008242 69.11 69.11 Voucher: 138214
138215 5/17/2024 cin02 CINTAS 5210494953 5/7/2024 FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES PW 213.01 213.01 Voucher: 138215
138216 5/17/2024 coa21 COAST NEWS GROUP 00152496 4/26/2024 AD ORDINANCE UTILITY RATES 360.00 Voucher: 138216 00152200 3/29/2024 AD 100-YR FLOODPLAIN 285.00 00152749 5/10/2024 AD ORDIN ADOPT 67.50
00152748 5/10/2024 AD ORDIN INTRO 52.50 765.00
138217 5/17/2024 coa10 COASTAL LIVESCAN SERVICES 43286 4/30/2024 EMPLOYEE TESTING-APR 1,054.00 1,054.00 Voucher: 138217
138218 5/17/2024 hds01 CORE & MAIN LP 0625782 3/29/2024 WATER PARTS PW INVENTORY 2,484.94 2,484.94 Voucher: 138218
138219 5/17/2024 bee04 DENNIS L JOBE, DBA BEE CHASER927445 5/2/2024 BEE REMOVAL 180.00 180.00 Voucher: 138219
138220 5/17/2024 end01 ENDURANT SPORTS LLC, DBA P2P RESCUE 2675 4/26/2024 SURF RESCUE BOARDS FOR DEL MAR LIFEGUARD 4,684.75 4,684.75 Voucher: 138220
138221 5/17/2024 fas03 FASTENAL COMPANY CASAD78007 4/30/2024 FACILITY MAINT SUPP PW 410.15 Voucher: 138221 CASAD78077 5/6/2024 FACILITY MAINT SUP PW 69.75 479.90 138222 5/17/2024 fed01 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 8-495-58288 5/10/2024 SHIPPING SRVC- OVERNIGHT DELIVERY 47.55 47.55 Voucher: 138222
138223 5/17/2024 fis12 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 2098 5/6/2024 VIDEO STREAMING APR 1,100.00 1,100.00 Voucher: 138223
138224 5/17/2024 gal02 GALLS LLC 027659680 4/15/2024 UNIFORM PANTS PRKG ENF 114.84 Voucher: 138224 027698070 4/18/2024 UNIFORM SHIRTS PRKG ENF 45.68 027761016 4/25/2024 UNIFORM SHIRTS PRKG ENF 33.36 193.88 138225 5/17/2024 ats01 GARDA CL WEST LOCKBOX #233209 10776979 5/1/2024 ARMORED SRVCS MAY 700.77 700.77 Voucher: 138225
138226 5/17/2024 int09 GREGORY CONLEY, DBA INTELLIDESIGN LLC 435 5/5/2024 SCADA SYS MAINT MAR/APR 1,070.00 1,070.00 Voucher: 138226
138227 5/17/2024 hol17 HOLIHAN, MICHAEL 05062024 5/6/2024 REFUND REF DEPOSIT PHCC 800.00 800.00 Voucher: 138227
138228 5/17/2024 jus02 JUSTIN LAPILUSA, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST INC 04242024 4/24/2024 EMPLOYEE TESTING-APR 2,500.00 2,500.00 Voucher: 138228
Page: 2
3 June 3, 2024 Item 04
05/16/2024
Check List
City of Del Mar
3 4:05:47PM
apChkLst Final Page:

Bank : gusbnk GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 138229 5/17/2024 kel12 KELLY SPICERS STORES 05072024 5/7/2024 COPY PAPER CH FY24 1,133.72 1,133.72 Voucher: 138229
138230 5/17/2024 kol04 KOLOSKY, CHEYENNE 05082024 5/8/2024 REFUND REF DEPOSIT PHCC 800.00 800.00 Voucher: 138230
138231 5/17/2024 msc01 MSC JANITORIAL SERVICE INC 2024-4-10 4/30/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES APR 4,809.25 Voucher: 138231 2024-4-11 4/30/2024 JANITORIAL SERVICES APR 990.00 5,799.25 138232 5/17/2024 nat18 NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AUTISM 05082024 5/8/2024 REF DAMAGE DEP 05/07/24 800.00 800.00 Voucher: 138232
138233 5/17/2024 nor13 NORTH COUNTY DISPATCH JPA 202324-179 5/2/2024 DISPATCH PW Q4 337.35 337.35 Voucher: 138233
138234 5/17/2024 oga01 OGAWA, FAYE 05062024 5/6/2024 REFUND REF DEPOSIT PHCC 800.00 800.00 Voucher: 138234
138235 5/17/2024 pac05 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY S100461204.001 3/6/2024 WATER METER PARTS 943.12 943.12 Voucher: 138235
138236 5/17/2024 sdg02 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 0081 7377 2988 5 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR 6,690.20 Voucher: 138236 0066 5491 6833 1 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR 3,027.14 0066 5392 2766 7 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR CS 1,111.76
0067 3735 0888 1 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR 297.10
0069 0908 1676 1 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR 253.91
0099 5222 5392 9 5/2/2024 UTILITIES APR 18.58
0085 7750 3585 7 5/6/2024 UTILITIES APR 18.14 11,416.83 138237 5/17/2024 san75 SAN DIEGO MAIN PI 2094 5/20/2024 USPS MARKETING MAIL 320.00 320.00 Voucher: 138237
138238 5/17/2024 sou08 SOUTHWEST SIGNAL SERVICE 83365 4/30/2024 AERIAL/SRVC TRUCK APR 3,816.25 Voucher: 138238 83364 4/30/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT APR 1,361.05 83366 4/30/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT APR 537.50
83367 4/30/2024 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT APR 472.50 6,187.30 Sub total for GENERAL ACCOUNT US BANK: 45,296.51
Page: 3
4 June 3, 2024 Item 04
05/16/2024
Check List
City of Del Mar
4 4:05:47PM
apChkLst Final Page:
37 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 202,582.76 Page: 4
5 June 3, 2024 Item 04
6 June 3, 2024 Item 04
7 June 3, 2024 Item 04
8 June 3, 2024 Item 04
9 June 3, 2024 Item 04
10 June 3, 2024 Item 04
11 June 3, 2024 Item 04
12 June 3, 2024 Item 04
13 June 3, 2024 Item 04
14 June 3, 2024 Item 04
15 June 3, 2024 Item 04
16 June 3, 2024 Item 04
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Denise Galvan, Management Analyst
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Biennial Review and Update of the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive this report and adopt the Resolution (Attachment A) incorporating revisions to the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code (Exhibit A to Attachment A) to reflect changes in staff positions.

BACKGROUND:

The Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq., "Act" herein) requires each local agency to adopt a Conflict of Interest Code. The Code designates City public officials involved in City decisions to disclose certain financial interests that could foreseeably be affected, in a material manner, by City decisions made by the officials in the performance of their job responsibilities. The Political Reform Act also requires every local government agency to review its Conflict of Interest code biennially. Pursuant to Government Code 87306.5, on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year, City staff is required to review the Conflict of Interest Code and submit a written report to the City Council indicating whether the City’s Conflict of Interest Code is accurate or needs amendment.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Government Code 87306.5 requirement, staff has reviewed the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with guidelines provided by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and is proposing that the City Council consider some amendments to the code.

The following provides a brief summary of the proposed changes, which are also shown in the redline Conflict of Interest Code included in this report as Attachment B:
1) Rename positions that have been reclassified or are now funded, including the Management Analyst positions assigned to the Planning and Community Development and Public Works Departments, and Project Manager I/II; 1 June 3, 2024 Item 06
City Council Agenda Report
Biennial Review and Update of the Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2) Rename the Special Projects and Programs Manager position to reflect an administrative title update; and
3) Add the Parking and Community Enforcement Lieutenant position to the Community Services/Lifeguard Department.

PRIOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:

On June 20, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution 2022-38 amending the City of Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code, pursuant to Government Code 87306.5.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact or action to be taken by the Council related to this agenda item.

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This is an operational item and is not related to the City Council Goals and Priorities.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Resolution Amending the City of Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code Exhibit A to Attachment A – Updated Conflict of Interest Code Attachment B – Redline Updated Conflict of Interest Code 2 June 3, 2024 Item 06
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL

MAR, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY OF DEL MAR

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Del Mar previously adopted its current Conflict of Interest Code in 2018 and amended it in 2020 and 2022; and
WHEREAS, provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government code Section 81000 et seq.) require a biennial review of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 87306.5, on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year, City staff is required to review the Conflict of Interest Code and submit a written report to the City Council indicating whether the City’s Conflict of Interest Code is accurate or needs amendment; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 2024, staff presented the City Council with a written report indicating that staff has reviewed the City of Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code, in accordance with guidelines provided by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) and proposed that the City Council consider amendments to the Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Del Mar, California, that:

1. The above recitals are true and correct; and

2. The City Council hereby approves the amended City of Del Mar Conflict of Interest Code, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Del Mar, California, at the Regular Meeting held this 3
rd day of June, 2024.
_____________________________
Dave Druker, Mayor
City of Del Mar
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
Leslie E. Devaney, City Attorney
City of Del Mar
Attachment A
3 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Resolution No. 2024-XX

Page 2 of 2 ends

ATTEST AND CERTIFICATION:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

CITY OF DEL MAR
I, SARAH KRIETOR, Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk of the City of Del Mar, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 2024-XX, adopted by the City Council of the City of Del Mar, California, at a Regular Meeting held the 3
rd day of June, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

RECUSE:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________________
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
City of Del Mar
4 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
City of Del Mar
Conflict of Interest Code

INTRODUCTION
The Political Reform Act of 1974 (Government Code Sections 81000 et seq., "Act" herein), requires the City to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code ("Code" herein). The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard model Conflict of Interest Code, and amendments thereto by the Fair Political Practices Commission in accordance with the Act.

Nothing in this Code is intended to modify or abridge the provisions of the Act commencing with Government Code Section 87100, which is applicable to all public officials of the City and directs that no public official of the City shall make, participate in the making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a City decision in which the official knows, or has reason to know, that he or she has a financial interest as defined by the Act.

Nothing in this Code is intended to modify or abridge the provisions of the Act commencing at Government Code Section 87200, which requires the Mayor, members of the City Council, City Manager, City Attorney, City Treasurer, and members of the Planning Commission to file a financial disclosure statement using the Fair Political Practices Commission Statement of Economic Interests (herein referred to as "Form 700").

This Code designates those public officials of the City who are involved in City decisions, and to require designated officials to disclose those financial interests (using Form 700) which could foreseeably be affected, in a material manner, by a City decision made by the official in the performance of the official's responsibilities.

AMENDMENT OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
Certain changes in circumstances require amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code.

Changed circumstances include, but not are limited to, the following: the creation of new positions which must be designated pursuant to this Code and relevant changes in the duties assigned to existing positions. [Government Code Sec. 87306, Subdivision (a)] Within 90 days after the changed circumstances necessitating the amendment to this Code become apparent, the City Manager, or their designee, shall submit a proposed amendment to the City Council. [Government Code Sec. 87306, Subdivision (a)] The Code shall be amended by resolution of the City Council.
5 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX

REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
No later than July 1 of each even-numbered year, the City Manager, or their designee, shall review the Code [Government Code Sec. 87306.5, Subdivision (a)].

If a change in the Code is necessitated by changed circumstances, it shall be amended by resolution of the City Council. If no change in this Code is required, the City Manager or their designee, shall submit a written statement to that effect to the City Council no later than October 1 of the same year [Government Code Sec. 87306.5, Subdivision (b)].

STANDARD CODE
By this reference, 2 California Code of Regulations, Section 18730, the Standard Conflict of Interest Code, is incorporated herein together with each and every amendment thereto duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission. The filing officer shall maintain three copies of the Standard Conflict of Interest Code for public review.

Unless otherwise indicated, the definitions of the Act, regulations, and amendments thereto, and binding judicial opinions thereon, are incorporated herein, and the Code shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with such definitions.

DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
Category 1: Business Position/Investment Interests. The designated employee or designated City representative shall report each City-related business entity in which the designated employee holds a business position, or has a direct or indirect investment worth more than $2,000.

Category 2: Real Property Interests. The designated employee or designated City representative shall report each interest in real property located within the jurisdiction of the City in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth more than $2,000.

Category 3: Income Interests. The designated employee or designated City representative shall report all income of the designated employee from any City-related source aggregating $500 or more. Additionally, the designated employee or designated City representative shall report the receipt of all gifts from any City-related source valued at $50 or more during the reporting period.

Category 4: More Inclusive Reportable Interests. The designated employee or designated City representative shall report all income, investments and business positions in business entities, as described in Categories 1 and 3, including those contracting with or selling to the City or which foreseeably could so contract with or sell to the City; and all income and interests in real property as described in Category 2. 6 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
FORM 700 FILING INFORMATION
Filing Officer: The Administrative Services Manager/City Clerk, or their designee, is the filing officer for the City.

Filing Location: The Form 700 should be filed with the Administrative Services Department located at the Del Mar Civic Center, 1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar CA 92014.

Time of Filing: All designated persons are required to file an assuming office, annual, and leaving office Form 700.

Type of Filing: Assuming Office, Annual Filing, and Leaving Office Assuming Office
All persons assuming designated position shall file a Form 700 within 30 days of assuming office.

Annual Filing
All designated persons must file a Form 700 by April 1. If April 1 falls on a weekend, the filing deadline will be extended to the next business day.

Leaving Office
All persons leaving designated position shall file a Form 700 within 30 days of leaving office.

EMPLOYEE FILING POSITIONS
The following are the designated positions within City departments and the required Disclosure Category. Designated employees shall file their statements with the City of Del Mar which will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction (Government Code Sec. 81008). Statements for all designated employees will be retained by the City of Del Mar.

POSITION Disclosure
Category
Office of the City Manager
City Manager (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4
Assistant City Manager 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Special Projects and Programs Manager 4
7 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
Administrative Services Department
Administrative Services Manager 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Information Technology Manager 4
Finance Manager/Treasurer (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4 Finance Officer 4
Office of City Attorney
City Attorney (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4
Fire Department
Fire Battalion Chief 4
Administrative Fire Battalion Chief 4
Fire Captain 4
Community Services/Lifeguard Department
Community Services Director/Chief Lifeguard 4
Deputy Community Services Director/Deputy Chief Lifeguard 4 Parking and Community Enforcement Lieutenant 1,3
Planning and Community Development Department
Planning/Community Development Director 4
Principal Planner 4
Senior Planner 4
Associate Planner 4
Assistant Planner I/II 4
8 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Code Enforcement Officer I/II 4
Public Works Department
Public Works Director 4
Principal Engineer 4
Maintenance Superintendent 1,3
Public Works Operations Manager 4
Project Manager I/II 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
The following are the designated City representative positions on Boards, Commissions, and Committees, together with the required disclosure categories.

NAME OF ENTITY Disclosure
Category
City Council (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4
Planning Commission (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4 Design Review Board 4
Finance Committee 4
Members of Boards, Committees or Commissions designated by resolution of the City Council, from time to time. * * As designated by resolution of the City Council.

CONSULTANT
Consultant shall include any natural person who provides, under contract, information, advice, recommendations, or counsel to the City, provided, however, that "consultant" shall not include a person who:
9 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX

1. Conducts research and arrives at conclusions with respect to his or her rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and direction of the agency or of any agency official, other than normal contract monitoring; and

2. Possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel.

POSITION Disclosure
Category
Consultants **
** Consultants shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in the code subject to the following limitations:

The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular consultant or new position, although in a "designated position," is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this Section. Such determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure required. The determination shall be included in the contract by which the consultant is hired by the City.

The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. Nothing herein excuses any such consultant from any other provision of this conflict of interest code 10 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
City of Del Mar
Conflict of Interest Code

AMENDMENT OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
Certain changes in circumstances require amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code.

Changed circumstances include, but not are limited to, the following: the creation of new positions which must be designated pursuant to this Code and relevant changes in the duties assigned to existing positions. [Government Code Sec. 87306, Subdivision (a)] Within 90 days after the changed circumstances necessitating the amendment to this Code become apparent, the City Manager, or their designee, shall submit a proposed amendment to the City Council. [Government Code Sec. 87306, Subdivision (a)] The Code shall be amended by resolution of the City Council.
11 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX

REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
No later than July 1 of each even-numbered year, the City Manager, or their designee, shall review the Code [Government Code Sec. 87306.5, Subdivision (a)].

Category 4: More Inclusive Reportable Interests. The designated employee or designated City representative shall report all income, investments and business positions in business entities, as described in Categories 1 and 3, including those contracting with or selling to the City or which foreseeably could so contract with or sell to the City; and all income and interests in real property as described in Category 2. 12 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
FORM 700 FILING INFORMATION
Filing Officer: The Administrative Services Director Manager/City Clerk, or their designee, is the filing officer for the City.

Filing Location: The Form 700 should be filed with the Administrative Services Department located at the Del Mar Civic Center, 1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar CA 92014.

Time of Filing: All designated persons are required to file an assuming office, annual, and leaving office Form 700.

Type of Filing: Assuming Office, Annual Filing, and Leaving Office Assuming Office
All persons assuming designated position shall file a Form 700 within 30 days of assuming office.

Annual Filing
All designated persons must file a Form 700 by April 1. If April 1 falls on a weekend, the filing deadline will be extended to the next business day.

Leaving Office
All persons leaving designated position shall file a Form 700 within 30 days of leaving office.

POSITION Disclosure
Category
Office of the City Manager
City Manager (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4
Assistant City Manager 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Environmental Sustainability/Special Projects Manager Special Projects and Programs Manager
4 13 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
Administrative Services Department
Administrative Services Manager 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Information Technology Manager 4
Finance Manager/Treasurer (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4 Finance Officer 4
Office of City Attorney
City Attorney (87200 filer, file with the FPPC) 4
Fire Department
Fire Battalion Chief 4
Administrative Fire Battalion Chief 4
Fire Captain 4
Community Services/Lifeguard Department
Community Services Director/Chief Lifeguard 4
Deputy Community Services Director/Deputy Chief Lifeguard 4 Parking and Community Enforcement Lieutenant 1,3
Planning and Community Development Department
Planning/Community Development Director 4
Principal Planner 4
Senior Planner 4
Associate Planner 4
Assistant Planner I/II 4
14 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX
Management Analyst (series position) 4
Code Enforcement Officer I/II 4
Public Works Department
Public Works Director 4
Principal Engineer 4
Maintenance Superintendent 1,3
Public Works Operations Manager 4
Associate Engineer Project Manager I/II 4
Management Analyst (series position) 4

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
The following are the designated City representative positions on Boards, Commissions, and Committees, together with the required disclosure categories.

CONSULTANT
Consultant shall include any natural person who provides, under contract, information, advice, recommendations, or counsel to the City, provided, however, that "consultant" shall not include a person who:
15 June 3, 2024 Item 06
Adopted by Resolution 2018-62; Amended by Resolution 2020-46; Amended by Resolution 2022-38, Amended by Resolution 2024-XX

2. Possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel.

POSITION Disclosure
Category
Consultants **
** Consultants shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in the code subject to the following limitations:

The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code. Nothing herein excuses any such consultant from any other provision of this conflict of interest code 16 June 3, 2024 Item 06
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Mayor Dave Druker and Deputy Mayor Terry Gaasterland, Council Liaisons to the Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee
Prepared by Denise Galvan, Management Analyst
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Appointment to the Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee (UPAC) REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee (UPAC) Council liaisons recommend that the City Council appoint Robert (Bob) Preston as a voting member to the committee to serve a full three-year term starting June 3, 2024, and ending on June 30, 2027.

BACKGROUND:

UPAC works with the Utility Undergrounding Project (UUP) team to ensure the citywide utility undergrounding project moves forward in a timely manner and UUP goals and tasks are achieved and assists with evaluating ongoing project success and lessons learned and makes recommendations for adjustments as necessary. There is one current vacancy on the Committee due to the resignation of Jim Hindman on November 14, 2023.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

City staff advertised the current UPAC vacancy, and one Citizen Interest Form was received during the recruitment period from Robert (Bob) Preston (Attachment A). According to Council Policy 200 Section E(5), individuals appointed to fill an unexpired vacancy should serve the balance of the vacant term. However, given the challenges recruiting to fill the vacancy, the Council Liaisons to UPAC have reviewed the application and recommend the City Council waive the requirements of Council Policy Section E(5) and appoint Robert (Bob) Preston as a voting member to serve a full three-year term beginning June 3, 2024, and ending on June 30, 2027.

If the recommended appointment is approved by the City Council, the Committee will have a full roster with no remaining vacancies. A copy of the current Committee roster is included as Attachment B for Council’s reference.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact or action to be taken by the City Council related to this agenda item.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Citizen Interest Form
Attachment B – Current Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee Roster 1 June 3, 2024 Item 07
2 June 3, 2024 Item 07
WĂŐĞϮ
d,/^/^Wh>/Z
KZ^h:
ddK/^>K^hZ
͘
EŽƚĞ͗WĞƌƐŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŵĂǇďĞǁŝƚŚŚĞůĚĨƌŽŵƉƵďůŝĐǀŝĞǁĂƐĂůůŽǁĞĚďǇůĂǁ Relevant Experience (job or volunteer etc.):

Name all of the Del Mar Committees/Boards/Commissions that you now serve on:

Please name all the Boards/Commissions/Committee/Task Forces that you have served on in the past, and if you can, the dates of your service:

Optional: Please list three Del Mar residents who can provide a reference**:

NAME STREET NAME (no house
number)
Phone Number
**Due to Brown Act limitations that restrict communications between Councilmembers regarding upcoming actions of the City Council, please do not include a current sitting Councilmember as a reference for your appointment.

Residency
Month Year
I have been a resident of California since:

I have been a resident of San Diego County since:

I have been a resident of Del Mar since:

What part of town do you live in? Geographic diversity is desirable and will be taken into account.

Check the neighborhood map to verify your neighborhood. ☐ North Bluff
☐ North Beach
☐ South Beach
☐ Village Center
☐ South Bluff
☐ South Hills
☐ North Hills
☐ Valley
Are you a full-time or part-time resident of Del Mar? ☐ Full-time ܆ Part-time Is Del Mar your primary place of residence? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Are you a registered voter in Del Mar? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Numerous volunteer boards and committees with research, fundraising, California state regulatory requirements, and decision making authority including:
- Ecke Family YMCA "Dreamcatcher" fundraising
- National Association of Residential Property Managers, National Board of Directors, President of the California State Chapter
- Wilsonia District Historical Trust, Board of Directors - UCLA Parent Council
None.

None
Lauren Doliva Seaview Ave
Steven Linden Seaview Ave
Mark Rittenbaum Bel Aire
April 1957
July 1983
November 1998
✔
✔
✔
✔
DocuSign Envelope ID: 53E46CC6-FBB9-4DC3-92A4-50B370F72F57 3 June 3, 2024 Item 07
4 June 3, 2024 Item 07
5 June 3, 2024 Item 07
6 June 3, 2024 Item 07
7 June 3, 2024 Item 07
City of Del Mar
Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Vice Chair
Amy A Cheshire
1st Term Apr 21, 2020 - Mar 01, 2025
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Voting Member
Wade H Walker
1st Term Apr 21, 2020 - Mar 01, 2025
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Voting Member
Steven Voss
1st Term Mar 19, 2018 - Mar 01, 2025
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Chair
Shirli Weiss
1st Term Feb 06, 2023 - Feb 28, 2026
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Secretary
Tom McGreal
1st Term Feb 06, 2023 - Feb 28, 2026
Appointing Authority City Council
Position Voting Member
Michael Minter
1st Term Feb 06, 2023 - Feb 28, 2026
Vacancy
Board Roster
Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee Page 1 of 1
8 June 3, 2024 Item 07
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Joe Bride, Public Works Director
Diana Martinez, Associate Management Analyst
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Purchase of Equipment Trailer from Sonsray Machinery REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council approve the purchase of a trailer from Sonsray Machinery in the total amount of $16,000 (Attachment A); and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary paperwork to purchase the trailer.

BACKGROUND:

The City currently utilizes a “flat-bed” equipment trailer to transport excavating and loading equipment to various work locations around the City. When combined with the haul truck, the City’s flat-bed trailer exceeds current gross vehicle weight (GVWR) limits for a Class B California Driver’s License. As a result, only employees with a Class A license are eligible to haul using this combination. Public Works Utility Worker and Specialist positions only require a Class B license, and there is currently one employee that has a Class A license.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The proposed replacement “box” trailer is smaller and lighter and will not exceed GVWR limits, allowing Class B license holders to haul using the trailer. In addition to hauling equipment, the “box” trailer is also suitable for containing, hauling, and offloading materials which will enhance Public Works crew productivity. This purchase is exempt from bidding per clause 7.04.09 (G) (“piggybacking”) of the Del Mar Municipal Code. The quote was obtained using Sourcewell Government Purchasing Agreement to select a local vendor with the most competitive pricing.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost of the proposed box trailer is $16,000, and funds are already available in the adopted Funds Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget. No fiscal action by the City Council is required for this agenda item.
1 June 3, 2024 Item 08
City Council Agenda Report
Purchase of Equipment Trailer from Sonsray Machinery
June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This is an operational item and is not related to City Council Goals and Priorities.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Sonsray Machinery Quote for 2024 Felling Dump Trailer 2 June 3, 2024 Item 08

NOTICE TO

PURCHASER

1. Caution. Do not sign this contract before you thoroughly read both pages 1 and 2 of it or if it contains blank spaces, even if otherwise advised.

2. You are entitled to an exact and completely filled in copy of this Sales Order when you sign it. Keep it to protect your legal rights.

3. Store Manager signature required for final acceptance of Sales Order.

THIS AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE. CUSTOMER HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT PRIOR TO SIGNING.

Purchaser’s Signature ____________________________ Sales Consultant ____________________________ Date _________ Print Name ____________________________________ Date _________ Accepted By _______________ Date _________

Page 1 of 3 ends

1475 Pioneer Way ∙ El Cajon ∙ CA ∙ 92020 TEL: (619) 873-0123 www.SonsrayMachinery.com
Ship To: CITY OF DEL MAR
1050 CAMINO DEL MAR
DEL MAR California 92014
Invoice To: CITY OF DEL MAR
1050 CAMINO DEL MAR
DEL MAR California 92014
Attention: Peter Kiefer
El Cajon
April 23, 2024 cvallombroso-0370
BP0008330 8587553294
Purchase Order:

Sales Person: Crystal Vallombroso

EQUIPMENT QUOTE/SALES ORDER
Felling FT-10 DT Serial #: Factory Order Stock #: N.I.S. $10,628.64 City of Del Mar ID# 58823 / Sourcewell - Contract #092922-FTS / SWREF# 58865 Sourcewell list price (QTY 1) $12,078.00 less Sourcewell discount ($1,449.36) = $10,628.64 FT-10 DT
Add Deck Length Feet 10
Rear Gate ? Barn Door Assembly
Deck Type 10 Gauge Steel w/ 20" High 12 Gauge Sides
Ramps, Acc NSO-No Ramps
Appx Deck Height 24" Unloaded Inches 1
Width 102" OD, 80" ID
Tie Downs Stake Pockets Each 8
Tie Downs No D-Rings
Brakes Electric, FSA (Fwd Self Adj) On All Axles Std
Axles 6K, Drop Std
Tires & Wheels ST225/75R 15 D, 6 Bolt [15 x 6] Mod Each 4 Center of Coupler to Headboard, Appx Feet 5
Hitch Type 2 5/16" Ball Adjustable, [B] 21,000 lb Channel Mount Jack ? 12K Drop Leg, Side Wind Each 1
Plug 7 Pole RV Std 1
Lights LED Lights (Peterson), Sealed Wiring Harness (Sealco) Std 1 Trailer Color Felling Black # CCA945378 (White Felling Decal) Std 1 Stripe Color None Std 1
Standard Single Hydraulic Cylinder Each 1
Standard Heavy Duty Battery, Pump and Remote with 15ft Cord Std 1 Standard Tread Plate Fenders Std 1
Standard 3/8" Safety Chains, Grade 70 Std 1
Option ? 6 Amp DC Charger with 110 VAC Input
Option ? Printed Owner's Manual Opt
GVWR 9,980 lbs Std
Warranty - Felling Lifetime Limited Structural Warranty / 3 Year Paint Warranty *** MACHINE QUOTED IS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY ***
***Quote Expires 06/30/2024 ***Financing Available on Approved Credit (OAC) ***Unit Based on Availability 3 June 3, 2024 Item 08

Page 2 of 3 ends

*** QUOTED PRICE IS NOT GUARANTEED, AND SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURER'S PRICE INCREASES, INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONAL SURCHARGES ***
Factory Freight $2,361.00
INITIAL DAR/PDI/FINAL ONSITE $ 800.00
MISC CHARGE $ 550.00
Quoted Price $14,339.64
Sales Tax 8.75% $1,254.73
Processing Fee $ 399.00
CA Tire Tax $ 7.00
Cash Due or Finance Amount $16,000.37
4 June 3, 2024 Item 08

Page 3 of 3 ends

1. This is a cash transaction. If the Purchaser so requests prior to acceptance, the Cash Due on Delivery may be financed as a time sale transaction, subject to credit approval. If this transaction becomes a time sale, Purchaser agrees (1) to make payments pursuant to the Sonsray Machinery Accounts Receivable System Agreement, which is incorporated into this Purchase Order by reference, and (2) that Seller retains a security interest in the goods described herein until all obligations of Purchaser are paid in full and discharged.

2. When trade-in equipment is not to be delivered to the Seller until delivery of the equipment purchased by this order, the trade-in equipment may be reappraised at that time and such reappraisal value shall determine the allowance made for such trade-in equipment. When the reappraised value is less than the original trade-in allowance shown on this form, the purchaser may terminate this order; however, this right of termination must be exercised prior to delivery of the equipment by Seller and surrender of the trade-in equipment to Seller.

3. The prices which Purchaser will pay for the new equipment set forth on the reverse side hereof shall be based upon the Case dealer price in effect on date of delivery of the new equipment. In the event Case dealer's price is changed prior to delivery, the purchase price shall be adjusted accordingly. If such price change results in an increase, purchaser has the option of canceling the order in writing immediately on being notified thereof.

4. The Seller shall be excused if delivery is delayed or rendered impossible by differences with workmen, strikes, work stoppages, car shortages, delays in transportation, inability to obtain labor or materials and also by any cause beyond the reasonable control of Seller, including but not restricted to acts of God, floods, fire, storms, acts of civil and military authorities, war and insurrections.

5. Purchaser shall keep the property free of all liens, taxes, encumbrances and seizure or levy, shall not use same illegally, shall not damage, abuse, misuse, abandon or lose said property, shall not part with possession thereof, whether voluntarily or involuntarily or transfer any interest therein or remove same out of the county or filing district in which Purchaser resides as indicated herein without the prior written consent of Seller, shall keep said property insured in such amounts and with such insurer as may be acceptable to Seller with any loss payable to Seller as his interest in the property may appear.

6. Time is of the essence of this contract and if purchaser fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof or defaults in the payment of any installment hereunder or under any renewal or renewals hereof, or in the payment of interest or defaults in the payment of any installment due under any other indebtedness of contract held by the Seller or Assignee, or if proceedings are instituted against Purchaser under any bankruptcy or insolvency law or Purchaser makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors or if for any reason the Seller deems himself insecure and so declares all payments heretofore made by Purchaser shall be retained by the seller and all indebtedness hereunder shall become immediately due and payable, with or without notice, together with all expenses of collection by suit or otherwise, including reasonable attorney fees and Seller may, without notice or demand, take possession of the equipment set forth on the reverse hereof, or any additions to, replacements of, or any proceeds from said equipment or may render the property unusable or Seller may require Purchaser to assemble the property and make it available at a place designated by Seller. Seller may resell the retaken property at public or private Sale in accordance with the Uniform Commercial Code or applicable state or provincial law. After deducting reasonable expenses for retaking, repairing, holding, preparing for sale, other selling expenses including attorney fees and legal expenses, the remaining proceeds of Sale shall be credited upon the amount of indebtedness remaining unpaid hereunder, and Purchaser agrees to pay any deficiency upon demand by Seller, any surplus, however, shall be paid to Purchaser. Said retaking or repossession shall not be deemed rescission of the contract. Seller may exercise any other rights and remedies provided by applicable law.

7. No waivers or modifications hereof shall be valid unless written upon or attached to this contract. Waiver or conditions of any breach or default hereunder shall not constitute a waiver of any other or subsequent breach or default. Payments received by Seller are to be applied first to delinquent interest and then to principal.

8. The remedies provided for herein are not exclusive and any action to enforce payment shall not waive or affect any of the holder's rights to have recourse to the property. The transfer of this contract shall operate to pass a security interest in the property as security for the payment hereof.

9. Any provision of this contract prohibited by the laws of any state, the United States, any province of Canada, shall be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition without invalidating the remaining portions of the contract.

10. Each maker, endorser, guarantor and surety hereon severally waives presentment, demand protest, and notice of non-payment and all defenses of want of diligence in collection and bringing suit. This contract shall be binding upon and shall insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representative, successors, and signs.

11. Buyer authorizes Seller to insert the Serial and/or model numbers of the goods set forth on the reverse side hereof for the purposes of identifying said goods. The seller may correct patent errors herein. 5 June 3, 2024 Item 08
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Joe Bride, Public Works Director
Diana Martinez, Associate Management Analyst
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Purchase of Replacement Parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station from Environmental Water Solutions, Inc.

REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Recommends that City Council approve the purchase of replacement parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station from Environmental Water Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $16,490 (Attachment A); and authorize the City Manager to execute the necessary paperwork to facilitate the purchase.

BACKGROUND:

The San Dieguito Pump Station was constructed in 1986 and is a critical component of the City’s wastewater system. Public Works recently conducted a condition assessment of the station and identified operational/check valves and pump parts that appear beyond their useful life and need to be replaced. Also, a backup inventory of replacement parts is necessary because of the long lead time required to procure these materials.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The replacement parts are essential to complete necessary repair work at the San Dieguito Pump Station and have a backup inventory of critical replacement parts. The new parts will ensure the San Dieguito Pump Station remains operable. This purchase is exempt from bidding per clause 7.04.09 (B)(sole source) of the Del Mar Municipal Code.

The parts are distributed by Environmental Water Solutions who is the only local authorized vendor for Gorman-Rupp (the parts manufacturer) in Southern California.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal action to be taken by the City Council related to this agenda item. Funds totaling $16,490 for the purchase of replacement parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station are included in the Adopted Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Operating and Capital Budget. 1 June 3, 2024 Item 09
City Council Agenda Report
Purchase of Replacement Parts for the San Dieguito Pump Station June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This is an operational item and is not related to City Council Goals and Priorities.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Environmental Water Solutions, Inc. Quote No. 24-0122-NSM01-R4 2 June 3, 2024 Item 09
Quotation Number: 24-0122-NSM01-R5
13720 Cimarron Ave, Gardena, California – 90249
(310) 763-7929 PH – (310) 763-7950 FX
May 23, 2024
Peter Kiefer
City of Del Mar
2240 Jimmy Durante Blvd
Del Mar, CA 92014
Phone : (858) 704-3676
Email : [email protected]
Dear Peter,
Environmental Water Solutions, Inc., is pleased to quote on the following for your consideration as per your request.

Item
#
Qty Part # / Description Unit Price Extended
Price
1 4 S1674 / O-RING BUNA $7.00 $28.00
2 2 25152-273 / O-RING BUNA $10.00 $20.00
3 2 10532A 15990 / WEAR PLATE STL $299.00 $598.00
4 2 D06 15991 / HEX NOT STL $1.00 $2.00
5 2 J06 15991 / LOCK WASHER STL $1.00 $2.00
6 4 11389G 19370 / GASKET NON-ASB $18.00 $72.00

LIFTSTATION PARTS
7 1 S5169B / PLUG VALVE 4” 3-WAY $5,652.00 $5,652.00
8 1 46421-220 / CHECK VALVE (NON-CLOG) – 4” L.H. $1,575.00 $1,575.00 9 1 46421-221 / CHECK VALVE (NON-CLOG) – 4” R.H. $1,575.00 $1,575.00 10 2 12066 10010 / SUCT FLANGE CI $921.00 $1,842.00
11 2 11557 17010 / CV PIN SST $21.00 $42.00
12 2 42111-903 / 10526A COV PLT CI $1,188.00 $2,376.00
13 1 ESTIMATED FREIGHT $1,500.00 $1,500.00
14 1 CITY OF DEL MAR SALES TAX 8.75% $1,206.10 $1,206.10 Total $16,490.10
3 June 3, 2024 Item 09
Quotation Number: 24-0122-NSM01-R5
13720 Cimarron Ave, Gardena, California – 90249
(310) 763-7929 PH – (310) 763-7950 FX
Shipment: 7-9 Weeks ARO, subject to prior sale and/or current shop load F.O.B: Factory – Mansfield, OH
Freight: Pre-Pay & Add
Terms: Net 20 Days / based upon credit approval
Price Validity: 30 days from the date of this quote
The attached Environmental Water Solutions, Inc. standard terms and conditions of sale apply to this quote.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to quote the above. We look forward to completing this order to your satisfaction.

Regards,
Nathan Maldonado
Sales Engineer
Accepted By – Name: ___________________________ _____
Signature: ________________________ _________________
Purchase Order #: _______________________ ____________
Date: ___________________ __________________________
4 June 3, 2024 Item 09

Page 1 of 2 ends

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR UNITS, PACKAGES, SYSTEMS, & PARTS Effective 7/1/2014
The foregoing quotation (“quotation”) is subject to the following Environmental Water Solutions, Inc. [Seller] Standard Terms and Conditions which supersedes Buyer's [Buyer] proposed terms and conditions, if any. The quotation and these standard terms and conditions shall be referred to hereinafter collectively as the “quotation.” This quotation contains the entire agreement of the parties and all proposals, negotiations, representations, or agreements made or entered into prior to or contemporaneously with this quotation are excluded whether oral or in writing. Prices and specifications set forth in this quotation are based upon the terms and conditions set forth herein.

ANY TERMS PROPOSED IN BUYER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THIS QUOTATION WHICH ADD TO, VARY FROM, OR CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS HEREOF ARE HEREBY OBJECTED TO AND REJECTED AND SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE ANY PART OF ANY CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS QUOTATION. ANY SUCH

PROPOSED TERMS SHALL HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT AND THE TERMS HEREIN SHALL CONSTITUTE THE COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF

THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS QUOTATION AND MAY BE MODIFIED ONLY BY WRITTEN INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES OF BOTH PARTIES.

1. Prices are EXW (Ex Works Incoterms) unless otherwise specified. Freight charges are not included in the quoted price, unless so stated. If order is not picked up by the Buyer, Seller may, in its discretion, select the carrier unless specified in advance by the Buyer. Purchase prices are stated in United States Dollars and payment shall be in United States currency.

2. Invoice terms are net 20 days unless otherwise specified. If Buyer fails to fulfill the terms of payment, Seller at its option may defer further shipment. Account past due shall bear interest at the rate of 1 ½% per month or at the highest rate permitted by law until paid. In addition to such late payment charges, Buyer shall pay Seller any and all costs associated with collection thereof, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. Seller reserves the right to modify or withdraw credit terms at any time without notice and may require down payments, C.O.D., payment in advance, progress payments, or payment guarantees.

3. Prices do not include sales, use, excise or any similar tax. Any tax or other governmental charge upon the production, sales, shipment, or use of the product which Seller is required to pay or collect from Buyer shall be paid by Buyer to Seller unless Buyer furnishes Seller with a tax exemption certificate acceptable to the applicable taxing authority. Buyer shall be responsible for obtaining any necessary governmental clearances, including import and foreign exchange licenses, which may be required by any government other than the government of the United States.

4. Seller shall not be liable for any failure to perform its obligations under any contract resulting from this quotation when such failure arises directly or indirectly from or is contributed to by any act of God, acts of Buyer, acts of civil or military authority, terrorism, priorities, fire, strikes or other labor disputes, accidents, floods, epidemics, war, riot, delays in transportation, lack of or inability to obtain raw materials, components, labor, fuel or supplies, or other circumstances beyond Seller's reasonable control whether similar or dissimilar to the foregoing.

5. Shipping dates are given to the best of Seller's knowledge based upon conditions existing at the time any contract resulting from this quotation is entered into and specifications contained therein, but are not of the essence of or in any way terms of the contract or representation of fact. Seller will, in good faith, endeavor to ship by the estimated shipping date, but shall not be responsible for any delay or any damage arising from failure to ship on the estimated shipping date. If Seller’s completion of an order/contract is delayed by Buyer, that portion of the order/contract that is completed or ready for shipment, will be invoiced at that time, to be paid per the payment terms of the order/contract. Equipment held for the Buyer will be at the risk and expense of the Buyer, including applicable storage charges.

6. Any order resulting from this quotation cannot be cancelled, altered, or rescheduled except with the written consent of the Seller and upon terms which will indemnify the Seller against all loss associated thereby. All additional costs incurred by the Seller due to changes to the order by Buyer shall be paid by the Buyer. Goods may be returned only when specifically authorized by the Seller. Seller’s Cancellation Terms will apply for order or goods cancelled or returned by the Buyer.

7. Title to the products and risk of loss with respect thereto shall pass to Buyer upon release thereof by Seller to a common carrier or upon tender of the products to an agent, employee, or representative of Buyer.

8. If Buyer has not made a claim to Seller within thirty (30) days after receipt of the products, the products shall be considered accepted and conforming to contract requirements.

9. Installation, start up of equipment, factory inspection or testing, and any materials or services shall be the responsibility of the Buyer unless otherwise specifically included in the Seller’s quotation or contract

10. Seller warrants to Buyer for a period of 18 months from the date of shipment or 12 months from placement into service, whichever first occurs, that any product delivered under any contract resulting from this quotation will at the time of shipment be free from defects in material and workmanship. If, within said warranty period, any such product is found, by Seller following its examination, to be defective in material or workmanship, Seller's sole obligation under this warranty will be to repair or replace such defective product at its option and expense, when received Freight Prepaid at the business establishment of Seller, or a repair facility authorized by Seller during regular working hours. Seller’s obligation under this warranty shall not include any transportation charges, cost of removal and reinstallation, duty, taxes or any other charges whatsoever which will be paid by the Buyer. No goods may be returned by the Buyer without Seller’s prior written consent. Seller does not warrant any products, accessories, or components not manufactured by Seller, but to the extent possible agrees to provide Buyer with the benefits of the manufacturer's warranty, if any. Seller shall not be liable for damage to or wear of products caused in whole or in part by abnormal conditions, improper application; maintenance; or use, failure to provide proper inlet conditions or flow, corrosives, abrasives or foreign objects, or other external causes.

THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

11. Neither party shall disclose to third parties nor use for its own purposes any confidential information or trade secrets of the other party.

12. The rights of the Buyer herein shall neither be assignable or transferable without written consent from the Seller. If bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings are instituted by or against the Buyer, or if Buyer makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, Buyer will be deemed in default and Seller will have the right to terminate its obligations by written notice to the Buyer, but such termination will not affect Buyer’s obligation to pay for items delivered and work in progress.

13. In the event Buyer claims that Seller has breached any of its obligations under any contract resulting from this quotation, whether in warranty or otherwise, Seller may request and require return of the product and refund the Buyer's purchase price (if product is in same condition as when shipped by Seller) upon Seller's receipt of returned product. If Seller so requests the return of the product, the product shall be redelivered to Seller in accordance with Seller's instructions. Redelivered freight charges will be to Seller's account. In the event Seller elects to require return of the product, Seller shall absolutely have no further obligation to Buyer under any contract resulting from this quotation except to refund such purchase price upon redelivery of the product and Buyer will be deemed to have waived any and all claims arising from such contracts.

THE REMEDIES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS AND THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH SHALL CONSTITUTE THE SOLE RECOURSE OF BUYER AGAINST

SELLER FOR BREACH OF ANY OF SELLER'S OBLIGATIONS UNDER ANY CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS QUOTATION, WHETHER THE

CLAIM IS MADE IN TORT, CONTRACT, OR IN ADMIRALTY, INCLUDING CLAIMS BASED ON WARRANTY, NEGLIGENCE, OR OTHERWISE.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT, IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE FOR INCIDENTAL

OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, NOR SHALL SELLER'S LIABILITY FOR ANY CLAIMS OR DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF OR CONNECTED WITH

ANY CONTRACT RESULTING FROM THIS QUOTATION, OR THE MANUFACTURE, SALE, DELIVERY OR USE OF THE PRODUCT, EXCEED THE PURCHASE PRICE OF THE PRODUCT.

14. In the event (1) Buyer modifies any product sold pursuant to any contract resulting from this quotation without the express written consent of Seller or (2) Buyer fails to implement any changes in the product directed by Seller or (3) any product to be furnished under any contract resulting from this quotation is made in accordance 5 June 3, 2024 Item 09

Page 2 of 2 ends

with drawings, samples, or manufacturing specifications provided or designated by Buyer, Buyer agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless Seller from any and all claims, demands, actions, or causes of action or costs or expenses however incurred.

15. In the event any product to be furnished under any contract resulting from this quotation is to be made in accordance with drawings, samples or manufacturing specifications provided or designated by Buyer, Buyer agrees to indemnify and hold Seller harmless from any and all damages, costs and expenses arising from a claim that such product furnished to Buyer by Seller or the use thereof, infringes any Letters Patent, foreign or domestic, and Buyer agrees at its own expense to undertake the defense of any suit against Seller brought upon such claim or claims. In the event any product to be furnished under any contract resulting from this quotation is not for a U.S. Government application and is not to be made in accordance with drawings, samples or manufacturing specifications provided or designated by Buyer, but rather is the design of Seller, Seller agrees to hold Buyer and its customers harmless against any damages awarded by a court of final jurisdiction in any suit for infringement of any United States Letters Patent by reason of the sale or use of such product as furnished by Seller under any contract resulting from this quotation. In the event any claim is asserted or threatened, as to which Buyer may seek indemnification hereunder, Seller shall have the sole right to contest, compromise, litigate, or otherwise dispose of said claim, including the right to substitute non-infringing products, and Buyer agrees to cooperate fully with Seller with respect thereto. The foregoing undertaking of Seller shall not apply unless Seller shall have been informed in writing immediately by Buyer of any charge or suit alleging such infringement and shall have been given the opportunity to assume the defense thereof with counsel of its choosing, and further, such undertaking shall not apply if (i) the claimed infringement is settled without the consent of Seller, or (ii) the infringement results from the use of a product delivered hereunder which is modified by Buyer or others without authorization by Seller or (iii) used in combination with a product not delivered by Seller where such infringement would not have occurred from the lone use of the product delivered under any contract resulting from this quotation.

16. The parties agree that should any provision contained in this Agreement be unenforceable under present or future laws or in a court of with jurisdiction over this agreement, the unenforceable provision will be replaced by a provision which lawfully enforces the parties’ intention underlying the unenforceable provision, and the remaining provisions of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

17. No provision of this Agreement is waived by any act or knowledge on the part of either party, except by a written instrument signed by an authorized representative of that party. The waiver by either party of any right or a party’s failure to enforce a provision of this Agreement is not a continuing waiver or a waiver of any other rights or of any material breach or failure of performance of the other party.

18. All articles herein will survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement or completion of any order.

19. Any contract resulting from this quotation shall be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in the State of California as effective and in force on the date hereof. Wherever a term defined by said Uniform Commercial Code is used herein, the definition contained in the Uniform Commercial Code is to control, provided, however, the term "Ex Works" shall be as defined in the Incoterms. No action for breach of sale, any contract resulting from this quotation or any covenant or warranty arising therefrom shall be brought more than one year after the cause of action has accrued.

20. Dispute Resolution. It is the intent of the parties hereto to use alternative dispute resolution proceedings (“ADR”), by first requiring participation in mediation and then requiring mandatory binding arbitration.
a. Arbitration: Subject to the mediation provision below, any dispute, claim or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation or validity thereof, including the determination of the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be determined by arbitration in Los Angeles County, California, before one arbitrator. At the option of the first to commence an arbitration, the arbitration shall be administered either by JAMS pursuant to its Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures, or by the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) pursuant to its Commercial Arbitration Rules. Judgment on the Award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. This clause shall not preclude parties from seeking provisional remedies in aid of arbitration from a court of appropriate jurisdiction. b. Allocation of Fees and Costs: The arbitrator may, in the Award, allocate all or part of the costs of the arbitration, including the fees of the arbitrator and the reasonable attorneys’ fees of the prevailing party.
c. Mediation Before Arbitration: The parties agree that any and all disputes, claims or controversies arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be submitted to JAMS or AAA, or its successor, for mediation, and if the matter is not resolved through mediation, then it shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause set forth above. Either party may commence mediation by providing to JAMS or AAA and the other party a written request for mediation, setting forth the subject of the dispute and the relief requested. The parties will cooperate with JAMS or AAA and with one another in selecting a mediator from JAMS’ or AAA’s panel of neutrals, and in scheduling the mediation proceedings. The parties covenant that they will participate in the mediation in good faith, and that they will share equally in its costs. All offers, promises, conduct and statements, whether oral or written, made in the course of the mediation by any of the parties, their agents, employees, experts and attorneys, and by the mediator or any JAMS or AAA employees, are confidential, privileged and inadmissible for any purpose, including impeachment, in any arbitration or other proceeding involving the parties, provided that evidence that is otherwise admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible or non-discoverable as a result of its use in the mediation. Either party may initiate arbitration with respect to the matters submitted to mediation by filing a written demand for arbitration at any time following the initial mediation session or 45 days after the date of filing the written request for mediation, whichever occurs first. The mediation may continue after the commencement of arbitration if the parties so desire. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the mediator shall be disqualified from serving as arbitrator in the case. The provisions of this Clause may be enforced by any Court of competent jurisdiction, and the party seeking enforcement shall be entitled to an award of all costs, fees and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, to be paid by the party against whom enforcement is ordered. d. Not a Condition of Employment. Employee and Company both acknowledge and agree that the decision to use ADR including arbitration was for each party’s benefit and convenience and that use of arbitration or other form of ADR was not a condition of employment of Employee by Company. Employee understands and acknowledges that by agreeing to mandatory arbitration he relinquishes his right to have his claims or defense heard by a judge and jury.

21. BOTH SELLER AND BUYER AGREE TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD THE OTHER PARTY HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LOSSES,

LIABILITIES, DAMAGES, CLAIMS (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, CLAIMS FOR PERSONAL INJURY, BODILY INJURY, ILLNESS, DEATH OR PROPERTY DAMAGE), COSTS, EXPENSES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, REASONABLE ATTORNEY’S FEES), PENALTIES, FINES AND JUDGMENTS OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER (COLLECTIVELY “LOSSES”),CAUSED BY OR ARISING OUT OF ANY NEGLIGENT ACTION, OR

OMISSION, OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, OR ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY OF THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY, OR ANY OTHER BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT BY THE INDEMNIFYING PARTY.NOT WITHSTANDING THE ABOVE, IN NO EVENT SHALL BUYER OR SELLER IS LIABLE TO EACH OTHER FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR FOR LOSS OF ORDERS.

Where Services provided to or on behalf of the Buyer are sold, resold, or otherwise transferred to a third party, the third party, and its customers, assignees, and other successors in interest to these Services, shall have no rights greater than those granted Buyer herein. Buyer shall defend, indemnify and hold Seller harmless, its officers, directors, and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities or expenses of third parties (including without limitation attorney’s fees) which Buyer could not itself recover hereunder.
6 June 3, 2024 Item 09
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Karen Falk, Principal Engineer
Diana Martinez, Associate Management Analyst
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Senate Bill 1 Funding for the City’s Annual Pavement Management Program
REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) adopting the list of projects that includes the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-2025 Citywide Annual Pavement Management Program to be funded by Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) from the State of California.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The purpose of Senate Bill (SB) 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), which created the State’s Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), is to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide.

SB 1 provides supplemental funding to cities and counties for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads system. For cities to obtain SB 1 funds from the RMRA, the law requires cities to maintain their existing commitment of local funds for street, road, and highway purposes. The amount of this commitment is calculated pursuant to Streets & Highways Code Section 2036, and the City’s General Fund FY 2023-2024 expenditures on streets and roadways have fulfilled this requirement.

In addition, SB 1 requires cities to develop a list of projects proposed to be funded by RMRA. If a city does not submit the list of projects as required each fiscal year, the city forfeits the funding. As such, the City must identify and adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to be funded from RMRA.

For FY 2024-2025, the City is eligible to receive an estimated $100,859 of RMRA funding based on SB 1 Local Streets and Roadways (LSR) FY 2024-2025 Revenue Projections (Attachment B), which is subject to change by the State of California pending fund availability. Staff proposes to use the RMRA funding to supplement pavement rehabilitation costs for areas included in the FY 2024-2025 Citywide Annual Pavement 1 June 3, 2024 Item 10
City Council Agenda Report
SB 1 Annual Pavement Management Program
June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

Management Program. Pavement rehabilitation segments will go out to bid later this calendar year as part of a Capital Improvement Program project. This funding will supplement the cost of asphalt overlay, pavement marking, drainage, as well as other roadway improvements at various locations. The details of the identified project that staff proposes be funded by SB 1 revenues for FY 2024-2025 is listed below:

Project Title Project
Description
Project Location(s) Estimated
Project
Construction
Schedule
Estimated
Project
Useful Life
FY 2024-2025
Citywide
Annual
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Project
City of Del Mar
Pavement
Management
Program
Segments
City Account:

On June 5, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-16 adopting the list of projects that included the FY 2023-2024 Citywide Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Project to receive SB 1 funding from the State of California.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal action to be taken by the City Council related to this item. SB 1 funding totaling $100,859 for FY 2024-2025 will be included in the FY 2024-2025 Operating and Capital Budget for Council consideration and adoption on June 17, 2024.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

The Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Project is a Tier 1 City Council priority item.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Resolution Adopting a list of SB 1 Projects for FY2024-25 Attachment B – LSR Projected FY 2024-2025 Revenues
2 June 3, 2024 Item 10
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DEL

MAR, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR
AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Del Mar (City) are aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $100,859 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2024-25 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the eighth year in which the City is receiving SB 1 funding, which will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City has undergone a public process to solicit public input regarding the community’s transportation priorities/project list; and WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management Program to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and costeffective projects that also meet the community’s priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate roads and active transportation infrastructure throughout the City this year, as well as many similar projects into the future; and
WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in good condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a better condition; and

ATTACHMENT A
3 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Resolution No. 2024-XX

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and City’s overall investment in local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide; and
WHEREAS, all locations listed are an estimate and have yet to be finalized.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Del Mar, California, that:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in part or solely with Fiscal Year 2024-25 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) revenues:

Project Title Project
Description
Project Location(s) Estimated Project
Construction
Schedule
Estimated
Project
Useful Life
FY 2024-25
Citywide
Annual
Pavement
Rehabilitation
Project
City of Del
Mar
Pavement
Management
Program
Segments
City Account:

40.7000.7009
Camino del Mar,
Carmel Valley
Road, Coast
Boulevard, Jimmy
Durante
Boulevard, and
minor repairs
throughout the City
Start: 09/24
Completion: 04/25
(based on the
component being
funded with RMRA
funds)
25 years
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Del Mar, California, at the Regular Meeting held this 3rd day of June, 2024. ________________________
David Druker, Mayor
City of Del Mar
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Leslie E. Devaney, City Attorney
City of Del Mar
4 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Resolution No. 2024-XX

Page 3 of 3 ends

ATTEST AND CERTIFICATION:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

AYES:

NOES:

RECUSE
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services
Manager/City Clerk
City of Del Mar
5 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

ALAMEDA COUNTY
ALAMEDA 1,886,962 2,105,295 3,992,256 2,139,548 2,017,062 4,156,609 ALBANY 536,772 605,181 1,141,953 614,925 573,781 1,188,705 BERKELEY 3,036,784 3,383,163 6,419,947 3,438,288 3,246,160 6,684,448 DUBLIN 1,776,734 1,983,032 3,759,766 2,015,284 1,899,234 3,914,518 EMERYVILLE 303,796 344,766 648,562 350,281 324,741 675,022 FREMONT 5,504,737 6,120,588 11,625,325 6,220,511 5,884,271 12,104,783 HAYWARD 3,925,594 4,369,021 8,294,614 4,440,279 4,196,251 8,636,530 LIVERMORE 2,099,540 2,341,084 4,440,623 2,379,195 2,244,296 4,623,491 NEWARK 1,136,247 1,271,111 2,407,358 1,291,737 1,214,588 2,506,325 OAKLAND 10,370,185 11,517,282 21,887,467 11,705,525 11,085,176 22,790,701 PIEDMONT 269,559 306,792 576,351 311,685 288,144 599,829 PLEASANTON 1,909,132 2,129,885 4,039,017 2,164,541 2,040,760 4,205,301 SAN LEANDRO 2,175,147 2,424,947 4,600,094 2,464,431 2,325,117 4,789,548 UNION CITY 1,676,802 1,872,188 3,548,990 1,902,626 1,792,412 3,695,038 County of Alameda 23,419,766 29,329,274 52,749,040 29,828,652 25,034,484 54,863,136 Total Cities & County: Alameda 60,027,756 70,103,609 130,131,365 71,267,507 64,166,477 135,433,985

ALPINE COUNTY
County of Alpine 454,609 614,399 1,069,008 616,352 485,953 1,102,305

AMADOR COUNTY
AMADOR 4,788 11,299 16,087 11,389 5,118 16,508
IONE 211,884 250,115 461,999 254,129 226,492 480,621
JACKSON 121,408 146,218 267,626 148,518 129,779 278,297 PLYMOUTH 25,594 35,190 60,784 35,675 27,358 63,033
SUTTER CREEK 63,278 78,465 141,742 79,663 67,641 147,304 County of Amador 2,300,838 2,320,953 4,621,791 2,356,472 2,459,473 4,815,945 Total Cities & County: Amador 2,727,790 2,842,240 5,570,029 2,885,847 2,915,862 5,801,708

BUTTE COUNTY
BIGGS 47,644 59,357 107,000 60,236 50,929 111,165
CHICO 2,571,190 2,905,080 5,476,270 2,952,528 2,748,466 5,700,994 GRIDLEY 180,712 209,938 390,650 213,273 193,171 406,444 OROVILLE 477,181 545,200 1,022,381 554,006 510,081 1,064,087 PARADISE 218,875 285,253 504,128 289,292 233,965 523,258 County of Butte 7,639,601 7,519,291 15,158,892 7,636,364 8,166,327 15,802,691 Total Cities & County: Butte 11,135,203 11,524,119 22,659,322 11,705,699 11,902,939 23,608,639 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 1 of 21
ATTACHMENT B 6 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

CALAVERAS COUNTY
ANGELS CAMP 87,411 114,270 201,681 116,089 93,438 209,527 County of Calaveras 3,483,754 3,475,744 6,959,498 3,527,599 3,723,947 7,251,546 Total City & County: Calaveras 3,571,165 3,590,014 7,161,179 3,643,688 3,817,385 7,461,073

COLUSA COUNTY
COLUSA 153,897 171,539 325,436 174,212 164,508 338,720
WILLIAMS 133,307 149,499 282,806 151,814 142,498 294,312 County of Colusa 2,699,228 2,355,181 5,054,409 2,380,241 2,885,331 5,265,572 Total Cities & County: Colusa 2,986,432 2,676,219 5,662,651 2,706,267 3,192,337 5,898,604

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
ANTIOCH 2,763,873 3,110,656 5,874,529 3,161,438 2,954,433 6,115,870 BRENTWOOD 1,544,548 1,742,372 3,286,920 1,770,750 1,651,040 3,421,790 CLAYTON 264,890 304,508 569,398 309,375 283,154 592,529 CONCORD 3,006,090 3,381,968 6,388,059 3,437,200 3,213,351 6,650,550 DANVILLE 1,045,388 1,181,756 2,227,144 1,200,963 1,117,465 2,318,428 EL CERRITO 621,071 706,471 1,327,541 717,882 663,891 1,381,773 HERCULES 629,594 716,018 1,345,611 727,585 673,002 1,400,588 LAFAYETTE 608,669 692,579 1,301,248 703,762 650,634 1,354,397 MARTINEZ 898,698 1,017,445 1,916,143 1,033,957 960,660 1,994,618 MORAGA 413,520 471,990 885,511 479,588 442,031 921,619
OAKLEY 1,077,255 1,217,450 2,294,705 1,237,242 1,151,528 2,388,770 ORINDA 467,341 532,276 999,617 540,863 499,563 1,040,425 PINOLE 453,311 516,561 969,872 524,890 484,566 1,009,455 PITTSBURG 1,825,360 2,056,914 3,882,273 2,090,451 1,951,212 4,041,664 PLEASANT HILL 826,227 936,269 1,762,496 951,450 883,192 1,834,642 RICHMOND 2,774,694 3,122,778 5,897,472 3,173,758 2,966,001 6,139,759 SAN PABLO 771,017 874,428 1,645,445 888,594 824,176 1,712,770 SAN RAMON 2,025,344 2,280,919 4,306,264 2,318,132 2,164,985 4,483,117 WALNUT CREEK 1,683,170 1,897,645 3,580,815 1,928,570 1,799,219 3,727,790 County of Contra Costa 19,772,157 24,908,968 44,681,125 25,331,859 21,135,384 46,467,243 Total Cities & County: Contra Costa 43,472,218 51,669,971 95,142,189 52,528,309 46,469,488 98,997,797 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 2 of 21
ATTACHMENT B 7 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

DEL NORTE COUNTY
CRESCENT CITY 161,558 183,500 345,058 186,382 172,697 359,079 County of Del Norte 1,404,834 1,297,182 2,702,016 1,316,663 1,501,692 2,818,355 Total City & County: Del Norte 1,566,392 1,480,682 3,047,074 1,503,045 1,674,389 3,177,434

EL DORADO COUNTY
PLACERVILLE 258,833 320,643 579,477 325,862 276,679 602,541 SOUTH LAKE TAHOE 512,950 1,674,974 2,187,924 1,685,317 548,316 2,233,633 County of El Dorado 7,344,895 9,234,647 16,579,542 9,358,262 7,851,302 17,209,564 Total Cities & County: El Dorado 8,116,678 11,230,264 19,346,942 11,369,441 8,676,297 20,045,738

FRESNO COUNTY
CLOVIS 2,981,287 3,283,843 6,265,129 3,337,196 3,186,837 6,524,033 COALINGA 432,554 483,104 915,658 490,845 462,377 953,222 FIREBAUGH 203,384 229,815 433,200 233,455 217,407 450,862 FOWLER 171,614 194,978 366,592 198,049 183,446 381,495
FRESNO 13,010,566 14,291,154 27,301,721 14,523,995 13,907,603 28,431,598 HURON 146,786 167,754 314,540 170,381 156,907 327,288
KERMAN 405,931 453,911 859,842 461,176 433,918 895,095
KINGSBURG 308,009 345,539 653,548 351,051 329,246 680,297 MENDOTA 301,354 338,240 639,594 343,634 322,131 665,765 ORANGE COVE 230,271 259,297 489,568 263,418 246,147 509,565 PARLIER 348,806 390,273 739,079 396,515 372,855 769,370 REEDLEY 607,663 677,115 1,284,778 687,990 649,560 1,337,550SANGER 636,297 708,513 1,344,811 719,901 680,168 1,400,069SAN JOAQUIN 88,560 102,908 191,468 104,493 94,666 199,159 SELMA 591,766 658,684 1,250,449 669,274 632,566 1,301,840 County of Fresno 25,750,544 26,599,658 52,350,202 27,023,244 27,525,962 54,549,206 Total Cities & County: Fresno 46,215,393 49,184,787 95,400,180 49,974,617 49,401,797 99,376,414

GLENN COUNTY
ORLAND 197,567 220,507 418,073 223,983 211,188 435,171
WILLOWS 153,179 172,493 325,671 175,188 163,740 338,928 County of Glenn 3,289,220 2,871,612 6,160,832 2,902,127 3,516,001 6,418,128 Total Cities & County: Glenn 3,639,965 3,264,611 6,904,577 3,301,298 3,890,929 7,192,227 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 3 of 21
ATTACHMENT B 8 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

HUMBOLDT COUNTY
ARCATA 447,422 518,614 966,036 527,009 478,270 1,005,279 BLUE LAKE 28,826 38,645 67,471 39,186 30,813 70,000
EUREKA 645,874 746,740 1,392,614 758,859 690,405 1,449,264 FERNDALE 33,351 43,801 77,152 44,427 35,650 80,077
FORTUNA 299,773 349,376 649,150 355,001 320,442 675,443 RIO DELL 81,090 98,198 179,289 99,720 86,681 186,401
TRINIDAD 7,350 14,175 21,525 14,313 7,857 22,170
County of Humboldt 6,211,341 5,855,674 12,067,015 5,945,246 6,639,594 12,584,840 Total Cities & County: Humboldt 7,755,027 7,665,225 15,420,252 7,783,763 8,289,712 16,073,475

IMPERIAL COUNTY
BRAWLEY 659,329 749,941 1,409,270 762,067 704,788 1,466,855 CALEXICO 927,117 1,050,144 1,977,261 1,067,196 991,038 2,058,234 CALIPATRIA 158,278 184,238 342,516 187,149 169,191 356,340 EL CENTRO 1,073,113 1,213,813 2,286,926 1,233,550 1,147,101 2,380,650 HOLTVILLE 132,373 155,197 287,571 157,632 141,500 299,132 IMPERIAL 514,650 586,748 1,101,398 596,214 550,133 1,146,347 WESTMORLAND 48,362 60,016 108,379 60,906 51,697 112,602 County of Imperial 11,609,734 9,855,850 21,465,584 10,004,407 12,410,188 22,414,595 Total Cities & County: Imperial 15,122,957 13,855,947 28,978,904 14,069,120 16,165,636 30,234,756

INYO COUNTY
BISHOP 92,702 110,234 202,936 111,949 99,094 211,043
County of Inyo 3,848,825 3,408,849 7,257,674 3,442,857 4,114,189 7,557,046 Total City & County: Inyo 3,941,527 3,519,083 7,460,610 3,554,806 4,213,283 7,768,089 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 4 of 21
ATTACHMENT B 9 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

KERN COUNTY
ARVIN 472,824 514,619 987,442 522,825 505,423 1,028,248 BAKERSFIELD 9,777,126 10,474,201 20,251,327 10,643,890 10,451,228 21,095,118 CALIFORNIA CITY 359,460 393,344 752,804 399,583 384,244 783,826 DELANO 1,238,430 1,337,151 2,575,581 1,358,645 1,323,816 2,682,461 MARICOPA 24,540 32,053 56,593 32,479 26,232 58,711
MCFARLAND 339,445 370,932 710,377 376,824 362,848 739,672 RIDGECREST 667,613 725,001 1,392,614 736,588 713,643 1,450,231 SHAFTER 510,388 555,805 1,066,193 564,663 545,578 1,110,241TAFT 208,221 229,551 437,771 233,165 222,577 455,741 TEHACHAPI 312,726 342,349 655,075 347,776 334,287 682,064 WASCO 649,202 705,305 1,354,507 716,572 693,962 1,410,535 County of Kern 23,723,148 25,091,344 48,814,492 25,494,249 25,358,783 50,853,032 Total Cities & County: Kern 38,283,123 40,771,654 79,054,777 41,427,258 40,922,621 82,349,879

KINGS COUNTY
AVENAL 327,977 361,011 688,987 366,750 350,590 717,340
CORCORAN 517,762 567,398 1,085,160 576,459 553,460 1,129,919 HANFORD 1,409,996 1,530,778 2,940,774 1,555,453 1,507,211 3,062,664 LEMOORE 647,167 707,758 1,354,925 719,084 691,787 1,410,871 County of Kings 4,903,915 4,539,280 9,443,195 4,609,436 5,242,024 9,851,460 Total Cities & County: Kings 7,806,817 7,706,225 15,513,041 7,827,182 8,345,072 16,172,254

LAKE COUNTY
CLEARLAKE 404,015 454,019 858,034 461,294 431,871 893,165 LAKEPORT 118,918 136,846 255,764 138,987 127,117 266,105 County of Lake 3,430,310 3,410,535 6,840,845 3,464,167 3,666,818 7,130,985 Total Cities & County: Lake 3,953,244 4,001,400 7,954,643 4,064,448 4,225,806 8,290,254

LASSEN COUNTY
SUSANVILLE 385,700 508,176 893,876 514,955 412,293 927,248 County of Lassen 3,305,090 3,049,365 6,354,455 3,079,536 3,532,965 6,612,501 Total City & County: Lassen 3,690,790 3,557,541 7,248,331 3,594,491 3,945,258 7,539,749 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 5 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
10 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
AGOURA HILLS 484,531 548,755 1,033,286 557,581 517,938 1,075,519 ALHAMBRA 1,977,964 2,212,432 4,190,396 2,248,462 2,114,338 4,362,800 ARCADIA 1,362,137 1,527,434 2,889,571 1,552,246 1,456,052 3,008,298 ARTESIA 394,750 447,889 842,639 455,080 421,967 877,046 AVALON 82,455 97,517 179,972 99,019 88,140 187,159
AZUSA 1,208,120 1,356,118 2,564,238 1,378,125 1,291,416 2,669,541 BALDWIN PARK 1,725,164 1,931,237 3,656,401 1,962,662 1,844,108 3,806,771 BELL 817,464 920,083 1,737,547 934,974 873,825 1,808,799 BELLFLOWER 1,888,518 2,112,939 4,001,457 2,147,340 2,018,725 4,166,065 BELL GARDENS 943,684 1,060,481 2,004,165 1,077,670 1,008,748 2,086,419 BEVERLY HILLS 783,108 881,868 1,664,975 896,132 837,100 1,733,233 BRADBURY 22,026 30,300 52,327 30,702 23,545 54,247
BURBANK 2,566,593 2,869,678 5,436,271 2,916,430 2,743,552 5,659,982 CALABASAS 556,213 628,487 1,184,700 638,619 594,562 1,233,181 CARSON 2,247,116 2,511,816 4,758,932 2,552,749 2,402,047 4,954,796 CERRITOS 1,182,143 1,325,724 2,507,867 1,347,257 1,263,648 2,610,905 CLAREMONT 896,567 1,008,071 1,904,638 1,024,403 958,383 1,982,785 COMMERCE 296,350 337,436 633,786 342,835 316,782 659,617 COMPTON 2,301,272 2,572,055 4,873,327 2,613,974 2,459,937 5,073,911 COVINA 1,228,566 1,378,861 2,607,427 1,401,240 1,313,272 2,714,512 CUDAHY 545,367 616,424 1,161,791 626,358 582,968 1,209,326 CULVER CITY 968,464 1,088,043 2,056,507 1,105,685 1,035,236 2,140,921 DIAMOND BAR 1,316,097 1,476,223 2,792,320 1,500,197 1,406,837 2,907,034 DOWNEY 2,728,176 3,049,409 5,777,585 3,099,105 2,916,275 6,015,379 DUARTE 545,774 616,876 1,162,650 626,818 583,403 1,210,221 EL MONTE 2,612,825 2,921,102 5,533,927 2,968,696 2,792,971 5,761,667 EL SEGUNDO 414,143 469,460 883,603 477,004 442,697 919,700 GARDENA 1,458,598 1,634,730 3,093,327 1,661,299 1,559,163 3,220,462 GLENDALE 4,691,487 5,233,243 9,924,730 5,318,702 5,014,950 10,333,652 GLENDORA 1,257,081 1,410,578 2,667,659 1,433,477 1,343,752 2,777,229 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 333,986 379,300 713,286 385,384 357,013 742,397 HAWTHORNE 2,107,273 2,356,265 4,463,538 2,394,651 2,252,562 4,647,213 HERMOSA BEACH 472,034 533,853 1,005,887 542,452 504,579 1,047,031 HIDDEN HILLS 41,443 51,898 93,341 52,653 44,300 96,953
HUNTINGTON PARK 1,310,087 1,469,539 2,779,626 1,493,403 1,400,414 2,893,817 INDUSTRY 10,319 17,278 27,597 17,466 11,030 28,496
January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 6 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
11 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
INGLEWOOD 2,598,723 2,905,416 5,504,139 2,952,754 2,777,897 5,730,650 IRWINDALE 35,936 45,773 81,709 46,427 38,414 84,842
LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 491,929 556,984 1,048,913 565,944 525,846 1,091,791 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 135,414 157,424 292,838 159,891 144,750 304,641 LAKEWOOD 1,970,805 2,204,470 4,175,275 2,240,369 2,106,686 4,347,055 LA MIRADA 1,179,055 1,322,288 2,501,343 1,343,765 1,260,347 2,604,112 LANCASTER 4,225,678 4,715,114 8,940,792 4,792,087 4,517,025 9,309,113 LA PUENTE 910,238 1,023,277 1,933,515 1,039,858 972,996 2,012,854 LA VERNE 787,489 886,741 1,674,230 901,086 841,784 1,742,870 LAWNDALE 761,057 857,341 1,618,398 871,204 813,530 1,684,734 LOMITA 501,266 567,370 1,068,636 576,500 535,827 1,112,328 LONG BEACH 11,113,142 12,376,190 23,489,332 12,578,623 11,879,358 24,457,981 LOS ANGELES 93,278,537 103,780,542 197,059,079 105,479,674 99,709,793 205,189,467 LYNWOOD 1,641,799 1,838,509 3,480,308 1,868,415 1,754,996 3,623,411 MALIBU 257,109 293,788 550,898 298,472 274,836 573,308
MANHATTAN BEACH 849,258 955,449 1,804,707 970,918 907,812 1,878,731 MAYWOOD 601,774 680,166 1,281,939 691,127 643,264 1,334,391 MONROVIA 906,455 1,019,070 1,925,525 1,035,581 968,952 2,004,534 MONTEBELLO 1,500,519 1,681,360 3,181,880 1,708,693 1,603,975 3,312,669 MONTEREY PARK 1,461,806 1,638,298 3,100,104 1,664,926 1,562,593 3,227,519 NORWALK 2,475,950 2,768,853 5,244,804 2,813,954 2,646,659 5,460,614 PALMDALE 4,054,041 4,524,197 8,578,238 4,598,045 4,333,554 8,931,598 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 319,741 363,455 683,195 369,279 341,786 711,065 PARAMOUNT 1,280,472 1,436,596 2,717,068 1,459,921 1,368,756 2,828,677 PASADENA 3,346,756 3,737,470 7,084,226 3,798,433 3,577,504 7,375,937 PICO RIVERA 1,487,974 1,667,406 3,155,380 1,694,510 1,590,565 3,285,075 POMONA 3,645,093 4,069,316 7,714,410 4,135,714 3,896,411 8,032,125 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 1,013,402 1,138,030 2,151,432 1,156,489 1,083,273 2,239,763 REDONDO BEACH 1,681,710 1,882,902 3,564,612 1,913,536 1,797,658 3,711,194 ROLLING HILLS (2)ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 202,211 231,724 433,935 235,407 216,153 451,560 ROSEMEAD 1,223,921 1,373,694 2,597,616 1,395,989 1,308,307 2,704,296 SAN DIMAS 836,569 941,334 1,777,904 956,573 894,248 1,850,821 SAN FERNANDO 566,172 639,566 1,205,738 649,879 605,208 1,255,087 SAN GABRIEL 944,810 1,061,732 2,006,542 1,078,943 1,009,951 2,088,894 SAN MARINO 300,492 342,043 642,535 347,517 321,210 668,727 SANTA CLARITA 5,522,359 6,157,439 11,679,798 6,258,033 5,903,107 12,161,140 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 7 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
12 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
SANTA FE SPRINGS 447,470 506,530 954,000 514,681 478,321 993,002 SANTA MONICA 2,234,499 2,497,781 4,732,280 2,538,484 2,388,560 4,927,045 SIERRA MADRE 267,644 305,506 573,150 310,381 286,097 596,478 SIGNAL HILL 281,626 321,058 602,684 326,188 301,043 627,231 SOUTH EL MONTE 467,844 529,193 997,037 537,715 500,100 1,037,815 SOUTH GATE 2,217,668 2,479,060 4,696,728 2,519,456 2,370,569 4,890,025 SOUTH PASADENA 645,563 728,874 1,374,436 740,633 690,072 1,430,705 TEMPLE CITY 874,613 983,651 1,858,263 999,582 934,914 1,934,497 TORRANCE 3,516,143 3,925,883 7,442,026 3,989,932 3,758,570 7,748,502 VERNON 5,052 11,419 16,471 11,511 5,400 16,911
WALNUT 680,853 768,127 1,448,980 780,530 727,795 1,508,325 WEST COVINA 2,624,173 2,933,725 5,557,898 2,981,526 2,805,101 5,786,627 WEST HOLLYWOOD 854,645 961,441 1,816,086 977,008 913,570 1,890,579 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 195,053 223,761 418,814 227,314 208,501 435,815 WHITTIER 2,104,903 2,353,629 4,458,531 2,391,971 2,250,029 4,642,000 County of Los Angeles 143,003,231 178,285,211 321,288,442 181,316,818 152,862,846 334,179,664 Total Cities & County: Los Angeles 358,308,536 418,739,577 777,048,113 425,693,117 383,012,762 808,705,878 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 8 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
13 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

MADERA COUNTY
CHOWCHILLA 461,930 498,797 960,727 506,730 493,779 1,000,509 MADERA 1,572,153 1,679,976 3,252,129 1,706,975 1,680,548 3,387,523 County of Madera 7,269,335 6,664,249 13,933,584 6,766,560 7,770,532 14,537,092 Total Cities & County: Madera 9,303,418 8,843,022 18,146,440 8,980,265 9,944,859 18,925,124

MARIN COUNTY
BELVEDERE 50,828 63,123 113,951 64,065 54,333 118,398
CORTE MADERA 244,085 283,076 527,161 287,598 260,914 548,512 FAIRFAX 181,717 211,738 393,455 215,105 194,246 409,351 LARKSPUR 312,965 360,758 673,723 366,557 334,543 701,100 MILL VALLEY 338,080 389,082 727,162 395,346 361,390 756,736 NOVATO 1,272,260 1,447,137 2,719,396 1,470,710 1,359,978 2,830,687 ROSS 55,904 68,847 124,751 69,883 59,758 129,641
SAN ANSELMO 305,879 352,766 658,644 358,433 326,968 685,401 SAN RAFAEL 1,472,460 1,672,920 3,145,379 1,700,202 1,573,981 3,274,183 SAUSALITO 170,321 198,886 369,207 202,041 182,064 384,105 TIBURON 218,515 253,239 471,754 257,287 233,581 490,869 County of Marin 5,327,167 6,134,566 11,461,733 6,235,833 5,694,458 11,930,291 Total Cities & County: Marin 9,950,181 11,436,137 21,386,318 11,623,061 10,636,214 22,259,275

MARIPOSA COUNTY
County of Mariposa 2,191,873 1,988,694 4,180,567 2,009,858 2,342,996 4,352,854

MENDOCINO COUNTY
FORT BRAGG 169,100 197,670 366,770 200,806 180,759 381,565 POINT ARENA 11,013 18,231 29,244 18,435 11,772 30,208
UKIAH 397,527 457,505 855,032 464,878 424,935 889,813
WILLITS 118,439 139,487 257,927 141,684 126,605 268,289 County of Mendocino 5,064,259 4,758,858 9,823,117 4,831,890 5,413,423 10,245,313 Total Cities & County: Mendocino 5,760,339 5,571,750 11,332,089 5,657,693 6,157,495 11,815,188

MERCED COUNTY
ATWATER 760,172 833,547 1,593,718 846,933 812,583 1,659,516 DOS PALOS 138,718 156,937 295,655 159,380 148,282 307,662 GUSTINE 145,517 164,296 309,813 166,858 155,550 322,409 LIVINGSTON 341,336 377,234 718,570 383,245 364,870 748,115 LOS BANOS 1,133,566 1,237,678 2,371,243 1,257,639 1,211,721 2,469,360 MERCED 2,157,526 2,347,428 4,504,955 2,385,420 2,306,281 4,691,701 County of Merced 9,745,993 9,282,691 19,028,684 9,428,057 10,417,948 19,846,005 Total Cities & County: Merced 14,422,828 14,399,811 28,822,639 14,627,532 15,417,236 30,044,768 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 9 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
14 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

MODOC COUNTY
ALTURAS 64,954 80,792 145,746 82,001 69,432 151,433
County of Modoc 3,237,932 2,879,497 6,117,429 2,906,574 3,461,177 6,367,751 Total City & County: Modoc 3,302,886 2,960,289 6,263,175 2,988,575 3,530,609 6,519,184

MONO COUNTY
MAMMOTH LAKES 174,128 2,084,077 2,258,205 2,087,888 186,133 2,274,021 County of Mono 2,373,262 2,235,838 4,609,100 2,255,749 2,536,891 4,792,640 Total City & County: Mono 2,547,390 4,319,915 6,867,305 4,343,637 2,723,024 7,066,661

MONTEREY COUNTY
CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA 75,727 87,419 163,147 88,746 80,949 169,694 DEL REY OAKS 37,756 46,494 84,250 47,155 40,359 87,514
GONZALES 204,366 227,066 431,432 230,646 218,456 449,103 GREENFIELD 476,846 522,746 999,592 531,099 509,723 1,040,822 KING CITY 330,802 364,339 695,141 370,134 353,610 723,744 MARINA 528,344 579,251 1,107,596 588,507 564,772 1,153,279 MONTEREY 681,380 745,193 1,426,572 757,129 728,358 1,485,488 PACIFIC GROVE 358,191 393,859 752,050 400,134 382,887 783,021 SALINAS 3,868,421 4,184,195 8,052,616 4,251,961 4,135,136 8,387,097 SAND CITY 9,002 15,502 24,505 15,660 9,623 25,283
SEASIDE 783,084 854,810 1,637,893 868,528 837,075 1,705,602 SOLEDAD 660,838 723,053 1,383,890 734,629 706,400 1,441,029 County of Monterey 10,833,329 11,898,892 22,732,221 12,092,724 11,580,252 23,672,976 Total Cities & County: Monterey 18,848,086 20,642,819 39,490,904 20,977,052 20,147,601 41,124,653

NAPA COUNTY
AMERICAN CANYON 515,799 570,880 1,086,679 580,019 551,362 1,131,381 CALISTOGA 124,928 142,695 267,622 144,908 133,541 278,449 NAPA 1,858,351 2,033,791 3,892,142 2,066,720 1,986,479 4,053,199 SAINT HELENA 130,578 148,841 279,419 151,155 139,581 290,735 YOUNTVILLE 71,562 83,644 155,205 84,912 76,496 161,407
County of Napa 3,743,274 4,161,087 7,904,361 4,228,621 4,001,361 8,229,982 Total Cities & County: Napa 6,444,491 7,140,936 13,585,428 7,256,335 6,888,819 14,145,154

NEVADA COUNTY
GRASS VALLEY 326,014 428,324 754,338 435,433 348,491 783,924 NEVADA CITY 80,181 109,225 189,405 110,973 85,709 196,682 TRUCKEE 401,645 2,136,804 2,538,450 2,145,562 429,337 2,574,900 County of Nevada 3,932,534 4,387,413 8,319,947 4,453,340 4,203,670 8,657,010 Total Cities & County: Nevada 4,740,373 7,061,766 11,802,140 7,145,309 5,067,207 12,212,516 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 10 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
15 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

ORANGE COUNTY
ALISO VIEJO 1,241,327 1,414,516 2,655,843 1,437,562 1,326,913 2,764,474 ANAHEIM 8,280,605 9,368,660 17,649,265 9,522,391 8,851,526 18,373,917 BREA 1,153,605 1,313,924 2,467,529 1,335,341 1,233,142 2,568,483 BUENA PARK 2,017,444 2,291,226 4,308,670 2,328,680 2,156,540 4,485,220 COSTA MESA 2,693,245 3,057,118 5,750,363 3,107,119 2,878,935 5,986,054 CYPRESS 1,206,420 1,375,085 2,581,505 1,397,482 1,289,599 2,687,081 DANA POINT 793,953 907,658 1,701,611 922,398 848,694 1,771,092 FOUNTAIN VALLEY 1,368,649 1,558,340 2,926,989 1,583,750 1,463,013 3,046,762 FULLERTON 3,456,768 3,919,602 7,376,371 3,983,778 3,695,101 7,678,879 GARDEN GROVE 4,119,066 4,667,741 8,786,808 4,744,213 4,403,063 9,147,275 HUNTINGTON BEACH 4,751,581 5,382,237 10,133,818 5,470,451 5,079,187 10,549,638 IRVINE 7,368,643 8,338,499 15,707,142 8,475,299 7,876,688 16,351,986 LAGUNA BEACH 550,754 631,937 1,182,691 642,162 588,727 1,230,889 LAGUNA HILLS 751,553 859,762 1,611,314 873,715 803,370 1,677,084 LAGUNA NIGUEL 1,549,073 1,762,150 3,311,223 1,790,908 1,655,877 3,446,785 LAGUNA WOODS 425,132 489,034 914,166 496,926 454,443 951,370 LA HABRA 1,503,081 1,710,197 3,213,278 1,738,102 1,606,714 3,344,815 LAKE FOREST 2,085,965 2,368,628 4,454,593 2,407,354 2,229,785 4,637,140 LA PALMA 373,107 430,265 803,372 437,192 398,831 836,024 LOS ALAMITOS 290,388 335,826 626,214 341,217 310,410 651,627 MISSION VIEJO 2,242,495 2,545,447 4,787,942 2,587,079 2,397,108 4,984,187 NEWPORT BEACH 2,038,776 2,315,323 4,354,099 2,353,173 2,179,343 4,532,516 ORANGE 3,342,136 3,790,112 7,132,248 3,852,160 3,572,565 7,424,725 PLACENTIA 1,257,105 1,432,339 2,689,443 1,455,677 1,343,778 2,799,455 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 1,147,978 1,307,569 2,455,547 1,328,881 1,227,128 2,556,009 SAN CLEMENTE 1,535,809 1,747,167 3,282,976 1,775,679 1,641,699 3,417,378 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 840,089 959,773 1,799,862 975,370 898,010 1,873,380 SANTA ANA 7,431,730 8,409,761 15,841,491 8,547,733 7,944,124 16,491,856 SEAL BEACH 604,335 693,464 1,297,799 704,683 646,002 1,350,685 STANTON 935,736 1,067,817 2,003,553 1,085,189 1,000,252 2,085,441 TUSTIN 1,924,885 2,186,671 4,111,556 2,222,407 2,057,600 4,280,007 VILLA PARK 140,370 165,363 305,733 167,969 150,048 318,017 WESTMINSTER 2,178,643 2,473,318 4,651,961 2,513,765 2,328,853 4,842,619 YORBA LINDA 1,630,307 1,853,912 3,484,219 1,884,179 1,742,712 3,626,891 County of Orange 50,705,139 65,169,319 115,874,458 66,286,789 54,201,095 120,487,884 Total Cities & County: Orange 123,935,890 272,235,652 150,776,774 148,299,762 132,480,872 283,257,646 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 11 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
16 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

PLACER COUNTY
AUBURN 329,940 380,823 710,763 386,955 352,688 739,643
COLFAX 48,266 60,369 108,635 61,266 51,594 112,860
LINCOLN 1,252,460 1,428,305 2,680,765 1,451,582 1,338,813 2,790,395 LOOMIS 163,138 191,241 354,379 194,273 174,386 368,659
ROCKLIN 1,706,801 1,941,974 3,648,774 1,973,694 1,824,479 3,798,173 ROSEVILLE 3,661,350 4,154,246 7,815,596 4,222,291 3,913,788 8,136,079 County of Placer 11,224,616 14,413,261 25,637,877 14,624,384 11,998,517 26,622,901 Total Cities & County: Placer 18,386,571 22,570,219 40,956,790 22,914,445 19,654,266 42,568,711

PLUMAS COUNTY
PORTOLA 50,277 172,120 222,397 172,972 53,744 226,716
County of Plumas 2,651,308 2,792,503 5,443,811 2,817,936 2,834,107 5,652,043 Total City & County: Plumas 2,701,585 2,964,623 5,666,208 2,990,908 2,887,851 5,878,759

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BANNING 748,177 854,444 1,602,621 868,304 799,761 1,668,065 BEAUMONT 1,354,858 1,540,038 2,894,897 1,565,136 1,448,271 3,013,408 BLYTHE 444,980 510,559 955,539 518,802 475,660 994,462
CALIMESA 262,448 303,737 566,185 308,599 280,543 589,142 CANYON LAKE 265,010 306,625 571,636 311,535 283,282 594,816 CATHEDRAL CITY 1,231,391 1,400,817 2,632,208 1,423,628 1,316,292 2,739,919 COACHELLA 1,016,611 1,157,130 2,173,741 1,175,962 1,086,703 2,262,665 CORONA 3,758,960 4,253,403 8,012,363 4,323,036 4,018,128 8,341,164 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 780,690 891,106 1,671,795 905,567 834,516 1,740,083 EASTVALE 1,669,739 1,895,098 3,564,837 1,926,029 1,784,862 3,710,891 HEMET 2,152,786 2,439,781 4,592,567 2,479,661 2,301,214 4,780,874 INDIAN WELLS 114,297 134,682 248,979 136,799 122,178 258,977 INDIO 2,174,788 2,464,591 4,639,379 2,504,878 2,324,733 4,829,611 JURUPA VALLEY 2,513,467 2,848,985 5,362,452 2,895,546 2,686,762 5,582,308 LAKE ELSINORE 1,723,153 1,955,327 3,678,480 1,987,248 1,841,959 3,829,206 LA QUINTA 909,280 1,036,104 1,945,384 1,052,948 971,972 2,024,920 MENIFEE 2,634,396 2,985,345 5,619,741 3,034,146 2,816,029 5,850,175 MORENO VALLEY 4,986,784 5,637,897 10,624,681 5,730,275 5,330,606 11,060,881 MURRIETA 2,650,389 3,003,379 5,653,768 3,052,476 2,833,125 5,885,601 NORCO 638,261 730,503 1,368,763 742,326 682,267 1,424,593 PALM DESERT 1,213,746 1,380,920 2,594,666 1,403,404 1,297,430 2,700,834 PALM SPRINGS 1,058,365 1,204,212 2,262,577 1,223,818 1,131,336 2,355,154 PERRIS 1,890,146 2,143,628 4,033,774 2,178,643 2,020,465 4,199,108 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 12 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
17 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct
RANCHO MIRAGE 407,295 468,066 875,362 475,611 435,377 910,988 RIVERSIDE 7,572,914 8,554,017 16,126,931 8,694,302 8,095,042 16,789,343 SAN JACINTO 1,295,315 1,472,898 2,768,213 1,496,893 1,384,623 2,881,516 TEMECULA 2,629,273 2,979,568 5,608,841 3,028,274 2,810,553 5,838,827 WILDOMAR 879,138 1,002,116 1,881,253 1,018,401 939,751 1,958,153 County of Riverside 44,086,537 52,904,478 96,991,015 53,794,840 47,126,163 100,921,003 Total Cities & County: Riverside 93,063,193 108,459,455 201,522,648 110,257,087 99,479,603 209,736,690

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
CITRUS HEIGHTS 2,100,042 2,394,375 4,494,417 2,433,561 2,244,834 4,678,395 ELK GROVE 4,237,793 4,821,722 9,059,515 4,900,799 4,529,975 9,430,774 FOLSOM 2,046,964 2,334,168 4,381,131 2,372,364 2,188,095 4,560,459 GALT 611,877 704,851 1,316,728 716,269 654,064 1,370,332 ISLETON 19,034 27,390 46,423 27,745 20,346 48,091
RANCHO CORDOVA 1,942,075 2,215,193 4,157,268 2,251,432 2,075,975 4,327,407 SACRAMENTO 12,455,982 14,153,600 26,609,582 14,386,028 13,314,782 27,700,810 County of Sacramento 30,703,103 36,348,706 67,051,809 36,959,862 32,819,984 69,779,846 Total Cities & County: Sacramento 54,116,870 63,000,004 117,116,874 64,048,060 57,848,055 121,896,115

SAN BENITO COUNTY
HOLLISTER 1,026,882 1,159,574 2,186,456 1,178,412 1,097,682 2,276,094 SAN JUAN BAUTISTA 49,894 61,617 111,511 62,532 53,334 115,867 County of San Benito 2,625,549 2,572,167 5,197,716 2,612,247 2,806,572 5,418,819 Total Cities & County: San Benito 3,702,325 3,793,358 7,495,683 3,853,191 3,957,588 7,810,780 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 13 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
18 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ADELANTO 877,749 996,579 1,874,328 1,012,758 938,267 1,951,025 APPLE VALLEY 1,819,757 2,056,026 3,875,783 2,089,570 1,945,224 4,034,793 BARSTOW 611,302 697,339 1,308,641 708,607 653,450 1,362,057 BIG BEAR LAKE 120,834 518,031 638,865 520,259 129,165 649,423 CHINO 2,229,854 2,516,596 4,746,450 2,557,699 2,383,595 4,941,294 CHINO HILLS 1,878,750 2,122,279 4,001,028 2,156,910 2,008,283 4,165,193 COLTON 1,288,588 1,459,482 2,748,070 1,483,235 1,377,432 2,860,667 FONTANA 5,119,947 5,764,890 10,884,837 5,859,266 5,472,951 11,332,217 GRAND TERRACE 314,641 361,166 675,807 366,966 336,335 703,301 HESPERIA 2,395,147 2,704,732 5,099,880 2,748,882 2,560,285 5,309,167 HIGHLAND 1,363,094 1,543,158 2,906,253 1,568,284 1,457,075 3,025,360 LOMA LINDA 604,000 689,138 1,293,138 700,272 645,644 1,345,916 MONTCLAIR 911,291 1,034,249 1,945,541 1,051,047 974,122 2,025,169 NEEDLES 118,032 138,359 256,392 140,535 126,170 266,705 ONTARIO 4,326,664 4,873,973 9,200,637 4,953,726 4,624,974 9,578,700 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4,176,861 4,705,733 8,882,594 4,782,725 4,464,843 9,247,568 REDLANDS 1,744,461 1,971,462 3,715,923 2,003,618 1,864,736 3,868,354 RIALTO 2,493,260 2,814,921 5,308,181 2,860,879 2,665,162 5,526,041 SAN BERNARDINO 5,349,643 6,022,856 11,372,499 6,121,466 5,718,484 11,839,951 TWENTYNINE PALMS 630,288 718,661 1,348,949 730,280 673,744 1,404,024 UPLAND 1,890,385 2,135,346 4,025,732 2,170,192 2,020,721 4,190,913 VICTORVILLE 3,284,628 3,703,686 6,988,314 3,764,232 3,511,092 7,275,324 YUCAIPA 1,311,285 1,484,972 2,796,257 1,509,143 1,401,693 2,910,837 YUCCA VALLEY 521,761 595,777 1,117,537 605,394 557,734 1,163,129 County of San Bernardino 41,401,809 49,395,147 90,796,956 50,201,621 44,256,331 94,457,952 Total Cities & County: San Bernardino 86,784,033 101,024,558 187,808,591 102,667,566 92,767,514 195,435,080 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 14 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
19 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CARLSBAD 2,746,300 3,135,288 5,881,588 3,186,642 2,935,648 6,122,291 CHULA VISTA 6,578,784 7,489,956 14,068,741 7,612,976 7,032,370 14,645,346 CORONADO 564,496 651,210 1,215,706 661,766 603,417 1,265,182 DEL MAR 94,354 113,010 207,364 114,774 100,859 215,634
EL CAJON 2,541,910 2,903,050 5,444,959 2,950,582 2,717,166 5,667,748 ENCINITAS 1,468,725 1,681,142 3,149,866 1,708,606 1,569,989 3,278,595 ESCONDIDO 3,611,862 4,118,786 7,730,648 4,186,325 3,860,889 8,047,214 IMPERIAL BEACH 634,645 731,917 1,366,563 743,785 678,402 1,422,187 LA MESA 1,448,015 1,657,610 3,105,626 1,684,687 1,547,851 3,232,539 LEMON GROVE 656,480 756,727 1,413,207 769,003 701,742 1,470,745 NATIONAL CITY 1,468,342 1,680,706 3,149,048 1,708,163 1,569,579 3,277,743 OCEANSIDE 4,137,860 4,716,452 8,854,312 4,793,828 4,423,153 9,216,980 POWAY 1,164,881 1,334,399 2,499,280 1,356,181 1,245,196 2,601,377 SAN DIEGO 33,050,212 37,578,168 70,628,380 38,196,188 35,328,918 73,525,106 SAN MARCOS 2,263,205 2,583,871 4,847,076 2,626,192 2,419,245 5,045,437 SANTEE 1,420,698 1,626,571 3,047,269 1,653,137 1,518,650 3,171,787 SOLANA BEACH 308,776 358,647 667,422 364,421 330,065 694,485 VISTA 2,390,215 2,728,187 5,118,402 2,772,882 2,555,013 5,327,895 County of San Diego 57,173,021 70,601,163 127,774,184 71,797,994 61,114,917 132,912,911 Total Cities & County: San Diego 123,722,781 146,446,859 270,169,641 148,888,133 132,253,070 281,141,203

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO - City Allocation 20,924,170 22,289,438 43,213,608 22,650,173 22,366,824 45,016,997 SAN FRANCISCO - County Allocation 10,744,237 11,495,848 22,240,085 11,682,454 11,485,017 23,167,471 Total San Francisco 31,668,407 33,785,286 65,453,693 34,332,627 33,851,841 68,184,468

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
ESCALON 178,102 205,854 383,956 209,117 190,382 399,499 LATHROP 839,873 949,475 1,789,348 964,864 897,780 1,862,644 LODI 1,587,164 1,786,176 3,373,340 1,815,258 1,696,594 3,511,852 MANTECA 2,126,091 2,388,501 4,514,592 2,427,458 2,272,678 4,700,136 RIPON 382,516 436,314 818,830 443,323 408,889 852,212
STOCKTON 7,744,072 8,669,874 16,413,946 8,811,770 8,278,001 17,089,771 TRACY 2,289,181 2,570,778 4,859,959 2,612,723 2,447,013 5,059,736 County of San Joaquin 17,556,449 19,482,103 37,038,552 19,801,582 18,766,910 38,568,492 Total Cities & County: San Joaquin 32,703,449 36,489,075 69,192,524 37,086,095 34,958,247 72,044,342 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 15 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
20 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
ARROYO GRANDE 438,970 514,538 953,508 522,887 469,236 992,123 ATASCADERO 736,948 859,839 1,596,787 873,855 787,758 1,661,614 EL PASO DE ROBLES 750,858 875,865 1,626,723 890,146 802,627 1,692,773 GROVER BEACH 305,376 359,624 665,000 365,432 326,431 691,863 MORRO BAY 252,584 298,803 551,387 303,607 269,999 573,606 PISMO BEACH 192,682 228,790 421,472 232,454 205,967 438,422 SAN LUIS OBISPO 1,144,124 1,328,946 2,473,070 1,350,707 1,223,008 2,573,715 County of San Luis Obispo 9,485,671 9,845,042 19,330,713 10,002,600 10,139,678 20,142,278 Total Cities & County: San Luis Obispo 13,307,214 14,311,446 27,618,661 14,541,690 14,224,704 28,766,394

SAN MATEO COUNTY
ATHERTON 167,137 195,492 362,629 198,593 178,660 377,253 BELMONT 673,359 771,000 1,444,359 783,492 719,785 1,503,277 BRISBANE 116,189 136,973 253,162 139,129 124,200 263,329 BURLINGAME 748,249 855,548 1,603,796 869,430 799,838 1,669,267 COLMA 34,883 45,182 80,065 45,829 37,288 83,117
DALY CITY 2,510,690 2,849,286 5,359,975 2,895,864 2,683,794 5,579,658 EAST PALO ALTO 719,279 822,842 1,542,122 836,187 768,871 1,605,058 FOSTER CITY 806,762 921,608 1,728,370 936,575 862,386 1,798,960 HALF MOON BAY 281,434 325,530 606,964 330,751 300,838 631,589 HILLSBOROUGH 272,384 315,313 587,697 320,366 291,164 611,530 MENLO PARK 817,775 934,041 1,751,816 949,213 874,158 1,823,371 MILLBRAE 558,511 640,340 1,198,851 650,702 597,019 1,247,720 PACIFICA 926,111 1,056,349 1,982,460 1,073,530 989,964 2,063,494 PORTOLA VALLEY 106,277 125,783 232,060 127,755 113,604 241,359 REDWOOD CITY 1,998,673 2,268,736 4,267,410 2,305,816 2,136,476 4,442,291 SAN BRUNO 1,053,792 1,200,496 2,254,288 1,220,046 1,126,448 2,346,494 SAN CARLOS 736,158 841,898 1,578,056 855,555 786,914 1,642,469 SAN MATEO 2,531,854 2,873,180 5,405,034 2,920,151 2,706,417 5,626,568 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 1,586,829 1,803,777 3,390,607 1,833,217 1,696,236 3,529,452 WOODSIDE 127,106 150,299 277,405 152,657 135,870 288,527 County of San Mateo 12,695,728 15,819,122 28,514,850 16,087,957 13,571,058 29,659,015 Total Cities & County: San Mateo 29,469,181 34,952,795 64,421,976 35,532,814 31,500,986 67,033,800 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 16 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
21 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
BUELLTON 123,300 142,211 265,511 144,422 131,801 276,223 CARPINTERIA 314,952 353,690 668,642 359,337 336,667 696,005 GOLETA 782,772 870,463 1,653,236 884,499 836,742 1,721,241GUADALUPE 203,863 230,688 434,552 234,344 217,919 452,263 LOMPOC 1,062,866 1,178,070 2,240,936 1,197,128 1,136,147 2,333,275 SANTA BARBARA 2,094,320 2,312,343 4,406,664 2,349,896 2,238,717 4,588,613 SANTA MARIA 2,625,442 2,898,136 5,523,578 2,945,213 2,806,458 5,751,670 SOLVANG 139,340 159,828 299,168 162,326 148,948 311,274 County of Santa Barbara 9,553,334 11,208,872 20,762,206 11,395,111 10,212,006 21,607,117 Total Cities & County: Santa Barbara 16,900,190 19,354,302 36,254,493 19,672,276 18,065,405 37,737,681

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CAMPBELL 1,050,704 1,185,609 2,236,313 1,204,872 1,123,146 2,328,018 CUPERTINO 1,449,835 1,633,385 3,083,220 1,659,964 1,549,796 3,209,761 GILROY 1,438,367 1,620,562 3,058,929 1,646,932 1,537,538 3,184,469 LOS ALTOS 758,160 858,512 1,616,672 872,411 810,433 1,682,844 LOS ALTOS HILLS 203,576 234,422 437,998 238,154 217,612 455,766 LOS GATOS 803,626 909,347 1,712,973 924,080 859,033 1,783,113 MILPITAS 1,963,551 2,207,780 4,171,331 2,243,777 2,098,932 4,342,709 MONTE SERENO 84,251 100,002 184,253 101,547 90,060 191,606 MORGAN HILL 1,098,730 1,239,309 2,338,040 1,259,452 1,174,484 2,433,936 MOUNTAIN VIEW 2,001,546 2,250,263 4,251,809 2,286,957 2,139,547 4,426,503 PALO ALTO 1,640,003 1,846,016 3,486,019 1,876,081 1,753,076 3,629,158 SAN JOSE 24,320,557 27,218,026 51,538,583 27,663,890 25,997,382 53,661,272 SANTA CLARA 3,171,695 3,561,126 6,732,820 3,619,272 3,390,373 7,009,645 SARATOGA 747,075 846,118 1,593,193 859,814 798,584 1,658,398 SUNNYVALE 3,742,488 4,199,339 7,941,827 4,267,949 4,000,520 8,268,470 County of Santa Clara 29,359,932 36,337,919 65,697,851 36,955,933 31,384,205 68,340,138 Total Cities & County: Santa Clara 73,834,097 86,247,734 160,081,830 87,681,085 78,924,721 166,605,806 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 17 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
22 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
CAPITOLA 235,897 268,378 504,275 272,659 252,161 524,820 SANTA CRUZ 1,549,767 1,730,783 3,280,550 1,758,905 1,656,619 3,415,523 SCOTTS VALLEY 294,195 334,023 628,218 339,361 314,479 653,840 WATSONVILLE 1,239,603 1,386,853 2,626,456 1,409,346 1,325,070 2,734,416 County of Santa Cruz 6,182,547 7,317,254 13,499,801 7,437,628 6,608,813 14,046,441 Total Cities & County: Santa Cruz 9,502,010 11,037,290 20,539,300 11,217,898 10,157,142 21,375,041

SHASTA COUNTY
ANDERSON 267,285 318,270 585,555 323,405 285,713 609,118 REDDING 2,246,589 2,621,875 4,868,464 2,665,035 2,401,484 5,066,519 SHASTA LAKE 247,461 295,244 542,705 299,998 264,523 564,520 County of Shasta 7,299,864 7,366,627 14,666,491 7,480,221 7,803,166 15,283,387 Total Cities & County: Shasta 10,061,199 10,602,016 20,663,215 10,768,659 10,754,886 21,523,545

SIERRA COUNTY
LOYALTON 17,813 40,870 58,683 41,175 19,041 60,216
County of Sierra 1,299,430 1,251,418 2,550,848 1,262,389 1,389,022 2,651,411 Total City & County: Sierra 1,317,243 1,292,288 2,609,531 1,303,564 1,408,063 2,711,627

SISKIYOU COUNTY
DORRIS 20,566 29,586 50,152 29,980 21,984 51,963
DUNSMUIR 40,821 78,871 119,691 79,651 43,635 123,286
ETNA 16,376 24,741 41,117 25,054 17,505 42,559
FORT JONES 16,616 25,017 41,633 25,335 17,761 43,096
MONTAGUE 29,448 39,860 69,308 40,423 31,479 71,901
MOUNT SHASTA 77,667 164,065 241,732 165,550 83,022 248,571 TULELAKE 21,571 30,749 52,321 31,162 23,059 54,220
WEED 69,479 86,159 155,638 87,487 74,269 161,756
YREKA 187,343 224,147 411,491 227,727 200,260 427,988
County of Siskiyou 5,248,771 4,916,135 10,164,906 4,964,685 5,610,657 10,575,342 Total Cities & County: Siskiyou 5,728,658 5,619,331 11,347,989 5,677,052 6,123,630 11,800,682 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 18 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
23 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SOLANO COUNTY
BENICIA 648,508 742,251 1,390,759 754,269 693,220 1,447,489 DIXON 455,322 522,358 977,680 530,795 486,715 1,017,511 FAIRFIELD 2,885,113 3,268,917 6,154,030 3,322,380 3,084,033 6,406,412 RIO VISTA 239,177 276,568 515,745 281,000 255,668 536,667 SUISUN CITY 705,321 806,331 1,511,652 819,401 753,951 1,573,352VACAVILLE 2,449,088 2,777,124 5,226,212 2,822,507 2,617,945 5,440,452 VALLEJO 3,011,645 3,411,632 6,423,277 3,467,440 3,219,288 6,686,728 County of Solano 9,057,727 10,319,097 19,376,824 10,490,757 9,682,229 20,172,986 Total Cities & County: Solano 19,451,901 22,124,278 41,576,180 22,488,549 20,793,048 43,281,597

SONOMA COUNTY
CLOVERDALE 215,642 250,087 465,730 254,084 230,510 484,595 COTATI 181,478 211,543 393,020 214,906 193,990 408,897
HEALDSBURG 270,684 313,185 583,869 318,203 289,347 607,550 PETALUMA 1,432,094 1,627,983 3,060,077 1,654,529 1,530,832 3,185,362 ROHNERT PARK 1,054,941 1,200,981 2,255,922 1,220,536 1,127,676 2,348,212 SANTA ROSA 4,262,094 4,823,278 9,085,371 4,902,282 4,555,951 9,458,234 SEBASTOPOL 180,089 209,976 390,065 213,314 192,506 405,820 SONOMA 257,804 298,653 556,457 303,432 275,578 579,011
WINDSOR 627,535 718,782 1,346,317 730,415 670,801 1,401,216 County of Sonoma 13,233,146 14,738,270 27,971,416 14,978,864 14,145,529 29,124,393 Total Cities & County: Sonoma 21,715,507 24,392,737 46,108,245 24,790,566 23,212,722 48,003,287

STANISLAUS COUNTY
CERES 1,173,093 1,320,407 2,493,500 1,341,872 1,253,974 2,595,846 HUGHSON 181,119 208,996 390,114 212,310 193,606 405,916 MODESTO 5,243,821 5,868,849 11,112,670 5,964,798 5,605,366 11,570,164 NEWMAN 295,823 338,048 633,871 343,461 316,219 659,680
OAKDALE 554,896 629,269 1,184,165 639,423 593,154 1,232,577 PATTERSON 582,189 659,739 1,241,928 670,392 622,329 1,292,721 RIVERBANK 593,969 672,889 1,266,858 683,757 634,921 1,318,678 TURLOCK 1,725,834 1,938,971 3,664,805 1,970,549 1,844,825 3,815,374 WATERFORD 217,845 249,996 467,841 253,982 232,865 486,847 County of Stanislaus 13,620,321 14,679,293 28,299,614 14,918,011 14,559,398 29,477,409 Total Cities & County: Stanislaus 24,188,910 26,566,457 50,755,367 26,998,554 25,856,658 52,855,212 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 19 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
24 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

SUTTER COUNTY
LIVE OAK 227,805 259,869 487,674 264,012 243,511 507,523 YUBA CITY 1,680,249 1,878,894 3,559,143 1,909,452 1,796,097 3,705,550 County of Sutter 4,173,489 3,942,256 8,115,745 4,003,498 4,461,237 8,464,735 Total Cities & County: Sutter 6,081,543 6,081,019 12,162,562 6,176,962 6,500,845 12,677,808

TEHAMA COUNTY
CORNING 197,064 225,447 422,510 229,025 210,651 439,676 RED BLUFF 354,887 401,555 756,442 407,999 379,356 787,355 TEHAMA 10,415 17,355 27,770 17,544 11,133 28,677
County of Tehama 4,621,681 4,060,937 8,682,618 4,106,423 4,940,331 9,046,754 Total Cities & County: Tehama 5,184,047 4,705,294 9,889,340 4,760,992 5,541,470 10,302,462

TRINITY COUNTY
County of Trinity 2,433,626 2,252,854 4,686,480 2,274,543 2,601,417 4,875,960

TULARE COUNTY
DINUBA 609,770 685,627 1,295,397 696,665 651,812 1,348,477 EXETER 247,892 282,140 530,032 286,627 264,983 551,610
FARMERSVILLE 248,610 282,935 531,545 287,435 265,751 553,186 LINDSAY 303,987 344,220 648,207 349,723 324,946 674,669 PORTERVILLE 1,499,969 1,672,303 3,172,272 1,699,455 1,603,387 3,302,842 TULARE 1,668,183 1,858,464 3,526,647 1,888,661 1,783,199 3,671,860 VISALIA 3,424,399 3,804,554 7,228,953 3,866,542 3,660,500 7,527,042 WOODLAKE 184,614 211,111 395,725 214,453 197,343 411,795 County of Tulare 16,446,477 15,490,063 31,936,540 15,730,446 17,580,409 33,310,855 Total Cities & County: Tulare 24,633,901 24,631,417 49,265,318 25,020,007 26,332,330 51,352,337

TUOLUMNE COUNTY
SONORA 124,473 154,656 279,129 157,114 133,055 290,168
County of Tuolumne 3,229,263 3,344,140 6,573,403 3,393,784 3,451,910 6,845,694 Total City & County: Tuolumne 3,353,736 3,498,796 6,852,532 3,550,898 3,584,965 7,135,862 January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 20 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
25 June 3, 2024 Item 10
Local Streets and Roads - Projected Revenues
Based on State Dept of Finance statewide revenue projectionsEstimated January 2024 2023-24 2024-25 Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Hwy Users Tax Road Mntnc TOTAL Account Rehab Acct Account Rehab Acct

VENTURA COUNTY
CAMARILLO 1,693,992 1,925,189 3,619,181 1,956,625 1,810,787 3,767,412 FILLMORE 404,590 465,671 870,261 473,179 432,485 905,664 MOORPARK 866,951 989,778 1,856,730 1,005,867 926,725 1,932,592 OJAI 183,273 213,756 397,029 217,157 195,909 413,066
OXNARD 4,827,811 5,466,459 10,294,270 5,556,050 5,160,673 10,716,723 PORT HUENEME 531,409 609,877 1,141,286 619,739 568,048 1,187,787 SAN BUENAVENTURA 2,635,091 2,990,396 5,625,487 3,039,296 2,816,772 5,856,068 SANTA PAULA 752,319 860,333 1,612,652 874,294 804,189 1,678,483 SIMI VALLEY 3,020,264 3,425,341 6,445,605 3,481,389 3,228,501 6,709,891 THOUSAND OAKS 3,031,445 3,437,967 6,469,412 3,494,222 3,240,453 6,734,675 County of Ventura 15,535,144 19,420,082 34,955,226 19,748,492 16,606,243 36,354,735 Total Cities & County: Ventura 33,482,288 39,804,850 73,287,139 40,466,310 35,790,786 76,257,096

YOLO COUNTY
DAVIS 1,548,714 1,768,746 3,317,460 1,797,640 1,655,493 3,453,132 WEST SACRAMENTO 1,297,327 1,483,639 2,780,966 1,507,843 1,386,773 2,894,616 WINTERS 180,376 211,371 391,747 214,736 192,813 407,549 WOODLAND 1,433,650 1,638,249 3,071,899 1,664,996 1,532,496 3,197,492 County of Yolo 5,894,164 6,041,610 11,935,774 6,138,203 6,300,548 12,438,751 Total Cities & County: Yolo 10,354,231 11,143,615 21,497,846 11,323,417 11,068,123 22,391,540

YUBA COUNTY
MARYSVILLE 315,767 352,431 668,197 358,049 337,538 695,587 WHEATLAND 91,242 105,382 196,624 107,006 97,532 204,538 County of Yuba 3,366,918 3,252,267 6,619,185 3,302,148 3,599,056 6,901,204 Total Cities & County: Yuba 3,773,926 3,710,080 7,484,006 3,767,203 4,034,126 7,801,329 Statewide Total $ 1,585,846,000 1,808,658,400 $ 3,394,504,400 $ 1,838,087,400 $ 1,695,185,000 $ 3,533,272,400 $ January 2024 CaliforniaCityFinance.com Page 21 of 21

ATTACHMENT B
26 June 3, 2024 Item 10
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Jon Edelbrock, Community Services Director
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Del Mar Annual Preparations for Summer Season
REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff requests that the City Council receive a report on the City’s annual preparations for the upcoming summer season.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Del Mar is a popular coastal town that has and continues to be a desirable community for both residents and visitors from around the world. The City’s vibrant downtown area, beach, and coastal parks have and continue to be focal points of the community. Beach and park attendance alone account for roughly three million annual visitors with the summer season and popular community events accounting for a significant percentage of the visitors. The Del Mar Fairgrounds, owned and operated by the 22nd District Agricultural Association, brings roughly another one and half million visitors annually to attend numerous events including the San Diego Fair, Del Mar Thoroughbred Club horse racing, concerts, and more – all of which present impacts to the City.

San Diego County, particularly the coastal cities, is one the most visited destinations in the United States and home to over three million residents. The Pacific Coast Highway, referred to as Camino Del Mar within City limits, includes a roughly seventy-mile segment through the County that is well-traveled annually – particularly in the summer season. With vibrant work centers for North San Diego County residents to the immediate south, Camino Del Mar is well-utilized and popular travel route for bike and vehicle commuters as well as those seeking recreational opportunities on foot, bike, or vehicle.

Despite being the smallest city in the County, with fewer than four thousand residents and a small but efficient staff, the City’s location and beauty contribute to significant demands on the community despite its size and have historically attributed to the need 1 June 3, 2024 Item 11
City Council Agenda Report
Annual Preparations for Summer Season
June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 4 ends

for the community and staff to collectively coordinate and communicate with each other to effectively prepare for those demands and challenges.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The City prepares for the peak summer visitor season, which typically begins Memorial Day weekend and runs through Labor Day, in numerous ways to account for the additional and increased demands on City services; minimize and communicate impacts to residents; showcase the City; and maintain public safety.

All City departments prepare for and are impacted by higher service demands associated with the influx of summer visitors attracted to the City’s popular beach, restaurants, activities at the Fairgrounds, and other regional activities such as the Surf Cup at the Surf Sports Park in Carmel Valley. A significant number of resources are spent across the City in advance of the peak season anticipating and planning for service needs and events associated with summertime along with more concentrated efforts focused on high-impact events including the Del Mar Foundation (DMF) Twilight Concert Series, Del Mar Village Association’s (DMVA) Summer Solstice Soiree, July 4 weekend, Opening Day at the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club, and the Junior Lifeguard program.

The City permits over three hundred events at the City’s beach, parks, Powerhouse Community Center, and Town Hall, with the greatest number and frequency during the summer season. City staff oversee planning, permitting, and staffing of the many events. Major events, such as DMVA’s Summer Solstice and DMF’s Twilight Concert Series, receive collective input from all City departments and the Sheriff’s Department to help condition and best insure safe and enjoyable events and access to public space.

Other significant dates, including the July 4th holiday weekend and large events at the Del Mar Fairgrounds, prompt the need for extensive planning, coordination, communications, and, in some cases, permits for use and/or impacts in the City’s rightof-way including City-reviewed Traffic Control Permits (TCP) to account for traffic modifications to accommodate increased vehicular traffic related to their events.

Notable events and associated preparations include:

Del Mar Foundation Twilight Concert Series – The City will co-host four concerts in Powerhouse Park on June 25, July 9, July 23, and August 13. Preparations for the thousands of attendees for each event include planning and coordination meetings with City staff and the Del Mar Foundation; establishing temporary designated rideshare zones adjacent to the park; scaled-up event staffing by Public Works and Community Services Departments; additional portable restrooms (including ADA) and cleanings; increased trash service frequency; public communications; and four contracted Sheriff’s Deputies to provide focused event and traffic safety.
2 June 3, 2024 Item 11
City Council Agenda Report
Annual Preparations for Summer Season
June 3, 2024

Page 3 of 4 ends

July 4 Holiday Weekend – The City is anticipating significant visitor impacts throughout the entire holiday weekend. With July 4 on a Thursday this year, preparations shall be made for a four-day weekend from the 4 th through the 7th
.

Preparations include additional Sheriff’s Deputies and Community Service Department staff providing extra enforcement on the City beach, parks, and streets; upstaffing and extended hours at all lifeguard towers to ensure beach and ocean safety; additional portable public restrooms with a robust cleaning schedule at many beach entrances and parks; staffing of an extra fire engine and a staged ambulance in the City on Thursday, July 4; street closures and parking modifications to accommodate the July 4 parade and fireworks display; and unified communications between all operations staff throughout the weekend.

Opening Day at the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club - Opening Day is Saturday, July

20. Preparations include increased staffing levels through the afternoon and evening hours to monitor traffic; establishment of multiple downtown rideshare zones to encourage safe driving and easy drop-off and pick-up; and the addition of an extra Sheriff’s Deputy paid for by the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club.

Junior Lifeguard Program – The City is offering four Junior Lifeguard sessions between June 10 and August 2. The popular summer camp will serve 232 children between the ages of 9-15, and largely takes place near the 17th Street Beach Safety Center with drop-off and pick-up in the loading zone on Coast Boulevard adjacent to the Beach Safety Center. Planning efforts include training of all participating staff prior to the beginning of the program, uniform procurement, scheduling of eight instructors and assistants each day, curriculum preparation; maintaining a loading zone in the 1700 block of Coast Boulevard with tiered drop-off and pick-up times to best facilitate safe access and ingress and egress; and more.

During the summer months, there is also an increase in the volume of customer calls related to summer activities, medical aids, enforcement issues, safety issues, cleaning, and maintenance of public areas, as well as a significant amount of time dedicated to responding to summer issues that arise, which impacts front-line staff and management.

Attachment A includes an overview of the summer preparations for each City department, as well as the Sheriff’s Department, that provide front-line service to the public. Some of these preparations are more apparent than others to the public, such as increased staffing for the lifeguard stations and beach maintenance, while others are less apparent, like the pre-summer cleaning and maintenance of the 21st Street sewer pump station so it is ready to accommodate peak wastewater flows, largely from the Fairgrounds, during the summer months. Frequent and increased communications via the City’s website and the Del Mar Weekly e-newsletter, are also vital links to keep the community informed.
3 June 3, 2024 Item 11
City Council Agenda Report
Annual Preparations for Summer Season
June 3, 2024

Page 4 of 4 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal action to be taken by the City Council related to this agenda item. The costs associated with the activities identified in this agenda report are included in the current FY 2023-24 budget and included in future FY 2024-25 operating budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This item is operational in nature and not related to the City Council’s goals and priorities.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Overview of Annual Summer Preparations for 2024 4 June 3, 2024 Item 11

ATTACHMENT A
Overview of Annual Summer Preparations - 2024

COMMUNITY SERVICES
• Lifeguard Services
o Increased lifeguard staffing beginning on weekends in May, all lifeguard stations open on weekends daily by Memorial Day weekend, and every day by June 17th- the “unofficial” start of summer. Lifeguard staffing levels for the peak summer season are 20 guards on the weekdays and 25 on weekends. Increased staffing beyond these levels is added for busy holiday weekends. o Provide lifeguard operations from 8:00 A.M. to 9:00 P.M. June through Labor Day. Hours of operation and staffing are closely watched and modified based on weather and number of visitors from spring break through fall. o Provide four sessions of the City’s Junior Lifeguard program which includes instruction in lifesaving techniques, the marine environment, skills training, and physical fitness for 232 children ages 9-15 yrs.
o Hiring and training twelve additional seasonal Student Lifeguards and one seasonal Lifeguard II to provide seasonal lifeguard and Junior Lifeguard programs staffing.
o Host a month-long lifeguard academy in May to train and certify new staff in CPR, AED, First Aid, ocean skills, and department operations. o All lifeguard staff required to attend a requalification day to meet the Department’s required running, swimming, paddling, and emergency skills service standards.
o Coordinate and provide weekly staff trainings on CPR, first aid, rope rescue, cliff rescue, SCUBA, and all technical skills.
o Continual collaboration and coordination with City staff and patrons to balance active and passive use of our public beach, ensure public access and safe recreational opportunities, and comply with the City’s municipal code. o Lead collaborative planning efforts between Fire, Sheriff, Public Works, and the City Manager’s office to prepare for the Del Mar Foundation’s Summer Twilight Concerts, July 4th holiday weekend, and Opening Day at the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club.
• Parking Management and Enforcement Services
o Increased parking enforcement by approximately one additional Officer on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays, with additional staff for holidays and special events.
o Extended enforcement hours until 11:30 P.M. Fridays and Saturdays from Memorial Day through Labor Day to cover the later evening parking and municipal enforcement challenges.
o Provide general municipal code enforcement throughout the City including assisting the Code Enforcement Officer to help monitor Encroachment Permits, Clean Water regulations, signage, and more.
o Implement conditions of the City’s updated paid parking program Conditional Development Permit (CDP).
5 June 3, 2024 Item 11

ATTACHMENT A
• Powerhouse and Park Operations
o Event permits are back to 2019 pre-Covid levels with events permitted daily across all facilities including Town Hall, Powerhouse Community Center, City parks, and the public beach. Staff have permitted approximately 300 special events at City facilities for the current fiscal year including 75 hosted by City of Del Mar non-profit organizations.
o Coordinate with City staff, Sheriff, and Fire Departments, to prepare for all major local events including Fourth of July and Opening Day of the Del Mar Racetrack. o Increased staffing and duties for maintenance staff including cleaning, opening, and closing, of public restrooms at both the Powerhouse Community Center and 17th Street Beach Safety Center and cleaning of the outside patio and walkways adjacent to both buildings. Maintenance staff continue to use best sanitation practices in high-touch areas.
o In collaboration with the City’s IT Department, organizers of major events now have the option to complete and pay for permit applications online through ETrakit Special Events.

COMMUNITY ENFORCEMENT
• Beach and Community Patrol Officers
o Staff the Beach and Community Patrol Officers (BCPO) to coincide with peak days/times and events, to provide supplemental enforcement on the beach and in City parks.
o Work with HR Department to hire additional part-time Beach and Community Patrol Officers to help with full staffing of the BCPO team. o The one full-time and four part-time seasonal BCPO’s work closely and in partnership with Lifeguards, Parking Officers, and Sheriff’s Deputies, to provide service and allow staff in those roles to focus more on their primary duties. • Sheriff’s Department
o Additional Sheriff’s Department staffing at the Fairgrounds for law enforcement during the Fair and races, paid for by the 22nd District Agricultural Association. o Strategic approach to crime prevention in the Del Mar community related to the Fairgrounds visitors in the community and beach visitors. This includes special deployments (using overtime) to address community concerns as they arise and preventative measures.
o Increased attention to preventing vehicle burglaries and thefts, including special details and surveillance.
o Targeted traffic enforcement in beach area, downtown, and near the Fairgrounds. Increased DUI enforcement in bar areas. Education and enforcement details on bicyclists causing traffic concerns. Continue use of the motorcycle officer for traffic enforcement.
o Outreach and coordination with local hotel owners/managers to address prolific offenders and identify probation offenders that may reside in the hotels, with the goal of preventing local crimes, including thefts and narcotic transactions. o More extensive, concerted effort related to probation checks for seasonal visitors/employees related to the Fair and Races.
o Proactive, strategic approach to graffiti prevention and enforcement. 6 June 3, 2024 Item 11

ATTACHMENT A
o Increased public education efforts on personal summer safety preparations and crime prevention tips for residents and businesses.
o Strategic deployment of Senior Volunteer Patrol to conduct extra patrols in identified “hot areas” and to help disseminate information to Del Mar citizens regarding safety concerns, crime trends, and how to avoid being a victim.

FIRE DEPARTMENT
• Fire Department participates in safety pre-planning coordination with other agencies related to the Fair and Races.
• Assessment of Crest Canyon Evacuation Plan to ensure that the plan still appropriately assists with guiding the City and residents in the event of the need to evacuate during a fire or natural disaster.
• On designated peak days (e.g., July 4, opening day at racetrack), an additional fire resource is staffed closer to the central area of the City. • Reposition the fire apparatus, as needed, on peak days, such as the first day of the race season, so it is more ready for deployment under the traffic conditions. • Position an extra ambulance crew at the Fairgrounds.
• Training and other non-emergency events are scheduled off-peak hours. • Proactive communication with bars/restaurants regarding occupant loads. • Wildfire Preparation and Response
o All fire suppression personnel attend a mandatory wildland fire refresher course. o Fire Department revisits and reviews procedures for wildland fire response for local and regional assignments.
o The City of Del Mar Fire personnel attend regional wildfire training schools, such as the County Wildland Drill, Camp Pendleton Fire School, and annual refresher training.
o During “Red Flag” days, staffing is increased or a call-in list for staffing is prepared.
o Ensure that all wildland firefighting tools are well-stocked (e.g., hoses, radio batteries, water, other tools, and equipment)
o Complete the Wildland Urban Interface inspection program within Del Mar. o Provide free disposal bins for residents to clear the brush from their property during one two-week period in the summer of each year.
o As needed, staffing schedules are adjusted to accommodate the need to send a strike team to a major fire in another geographic area outside of Del Mar as part of fire service mutual aid.
o Participate in regional wildland fire suppression exercises, as needed. • Increased public education efforts on topics such as drowning prevention, not leaving babies and pets in cars, and brush clearance around homes. • Schedule staff vacations to ensure maximum staff coverage due to activities at the Fairgrounds.

PUBLIC WORKS
• Pre-Summer Preparations
Prior to the start of summer (Memorial Day Weekend), Public Works employees:
o Refresh red curb paint and signage;
o Complete annual Sidewalk Trip Hazard Elimination Program; o Coordinate arrangements for any special events scheduled for summertime, including:
▪ Portable restrooms (delivery and removal);
7 June 3, 2024 Item 11

ATTACHMENT A
▪ Delivery of dumpsters for trash and recycling;
▪ Schedule staffing for special events;
▪ Staffing assists with set-up and break-down the day of the event; and ▪ Coordinate arrangements with event sponsor (e.g. Del Mar Foundation). • Beach Maintenance Staffing
During winter, the Public Works Beach Maintenance staff consists of one two crew members working eight hours per day weekly. During the summer, Beach Maintenance staffing expands to three members working 8-hour offset shifts daily. Coverage hours gradually expand in coordination with sunset times from 6:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. in the winter to 6:00 A.M. to 7:30 P.M. daily during the summer peak. • Beach Cleaning
Increased frequency of beach cleaning from twice per week during the spring to four times per week in the peak of summer (Monday through Friday). Cleaning is to be completed prior to 9:00 A.M. in order to minimize impacts on beach attendees and to maximize ability to clean before the beach is too crowded. Availability is based on tide schedule and access.
• Additional Trash and Recycling Receptacles
Input from citizens has led to the placement of additional trash and recycling receptacles in recent years at street ends in the Beach Colony that contend with a large amount of visitor-generated trash. Select high-use locations, including streets and gutters, are also monitored and receive additional service from staff, as needed. • Restroom Attendant for Powerhouse and Beach Safety Center Additional cleaning and sanitation is provided at the Powerhouse, 17th Street Beach Safety Center, and 25th Street restrooms from late May through September. The City contracts with a third-part janitorial service provider to provide cleaning staff beginning weekends in late May before expanding to a daily presence during the summer peak.

The beach attendant typically starts at 2:00 P.M. and is onsite through 8:00 P.M., which augments City staff that provide service between 6:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. • Wastewater System Preparations for Increased Summer Flows In preparation for peak wastewater flows during summer months, the Public Works Department ensures that the 21st Street Sewer Pump Station wet well and force main are cleaned and emptied at regular intervals. Sand is cleaned out of the system is maintained at a high-level of efficiency to blockages clogs or other issues. • Summer Duties for Public Works Utilities and Operations Staff o Public Works crews are scheduled with daily assignments related to dealing with the large influx of visitors. One example is citywide right-of-way vegetation clearing along paths, sidewalks, and bike lanes.
o During the summer, there is an increase in service calls related to the large influx of visitors, especially for repairs of beach restrooms, showers, and drinking fountains.
o Additional time is spent conducting water quality testing since high temperatures can cause chemical reactions that require staff to maintain extra vigilance in monitoring the City’s drinking water quality.
o When there are scheduled large bicycling and marathon-type events passing through the City, Public Works crews drive along the bike lanes and sidewalks and check for trip hazards to repair prior to the events. 8 June 3, 2024 Item 11

ATTACHMENT A
o Coordination with Planning on processing of the 22nd District Agricultural Association encroachment permit for on-street traffic control for the Fair and Races.
• Preparations for 4th of July Weekend
o Schedule additional Public Works staffing for the weekend, as well as request overtime Sheriff’s Department staffing for the weekend. o Structure work schedules for Lifeguards, Parking Enforcement, Beach & Community Patrol Officers, Beach Maintenance staff, and restroom attendant to maximize coverage when necessary, during the holiday weekend. o Coordinate delivery/pick-up of portable restrooms at the street ends for the weekend and plan for additional street sweeping following the holiday weekend. o Considering placement of “no parking” signs in areas that attract fireworks viewers, pending confirmation of Fairgrounds’ fireworks plans.

PREPARATIONS FOR FAIRGROUNDS ACTIVITIES
• Traffic Control for the Fair
o Staff recently reviewed and approved the Traffic Control Permit for the 2024 Fair operations.
• Preparations for Opening Day of the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club Summer Race Meet
o Staff received approval for an additional Sheriff’s Department Deputy (funded by the Del Mar Thoroughbred Club) for deployment in the vicinity of 15th Street and Camino Del Mar in the afternoon and evening of Opening Day, July 20. 9 June 3, 2024 Item 11
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Kaitlyn Elliott-Norgrove, Special Projects and Programs Manager Clem Brown, Assistant City Manager
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Agreement with Townsend Public Affairs for Legislative Advocacy Services REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Townsend Public Affairs (Attachment A) to provide state and federal legislative advocacy services for an initial three-year period effective June 3, 2024, through June 2, 2027; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any subsequent extensions allowed for under the Agreement based on satisfactory performance.

BACKGROUND:

Since 2013, the City of Del Mar has contracted out for legislative advocacy services, which generally includes implementing the City’s Legislative Policy Guidelines; building and strengthening relevant relationships with Del Mar’s elected representatives to advance the City’s goals and priorities; coordinating legislative advocacy meetings; identifying, analyzing, and monitoring all bill introductions and amendments relevant to the City’s Legislative Policy Guidelines and their potential impact on the City; preparing and submitting testimony, position letters and bill language regarding legislation relevant to the City; identifying projects and other funding priorities that may be suitable for the City through state budget opportunities and federal appropriations; providing as-needed grant writing services; preparing and filing all applicable state and federal lobbying disclosure reports; and providing timely progress reports on the status of all legislative activities, such as bill language, amendments, and legislative committee analyses.

These services are currently provided by Townsend Public Affairs, whose contract began in January 2021 and expired in January 2024, and has continued on an interim basis under the same terms and conditions while the City conducts a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) solicitation process.
1 June 3, 2024 Item 12
City Council Agenda Report
Agreement with Townsend Public Affairs for Legislative Advocacy Services June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

In January 2024, the City issued an RFQ for legislative advocacy services. Two firms submitted proposals in response to the RFQ, including TPA and The CrisCom Company.

The proposals were carefully evaluated by City staff based on experience and qualifications, and costs were evaluated to ensure they are aligned with the market.

After reviewing the proposals, staff determined that TPA, the City’s current service provider, is the most qualified consultant to meet the City’s current and future needs. In addition to proposing the lower cost, TPA has a proven track record of providing a high level of service to the City of Del Mar. TPA offers expertise in the areas of local governance, transportation and infrastructure, water and sanitation, education policy, housing and economic development, energy, environment and natural resources, public safety, and budget and finance. TPA has niche, expert knowledge of the City’s needs and goals and has helped to secure the City nearly $7 million in local, state, and federal funding since 2021.

In May 2024, staff pursued negotiations with TPA to refine the proposed scope of services and reduce the cost to the City, and successfully negotiated a cost savings of more than twenty-five percent (25%) compared to TPA’s original proposal for services. The final TPA proposal is included as Attachment B. The fee schedule included as Exhibit B to Attachment A reflects a rate of $4,000 per month for FY24-25 and $4,500 per month for FY25-26 and FY26-27.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact of this agreement will be $4,000/month for a total of $48,000 annually during the first year. Sufficient funds for state and federal legislative advocacy services are available in the approved Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget and in the proposed Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Budget Update. Funds for these services will also be included in future fiscal year operating and capital budgets for Council consideration.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

The recommended action is part of City operations and is not a special project on the City Council’s list of goals and priorities.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Agreement with Townsend Public Affairs
Attachment B – Townsend Public Affairs Revised Proposal (May 2024) 2 June 3, 2024 Item 12

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF DEL MAR AND TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC

FOR STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES
This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 3rd day of June, 2024 by and between the City of Del Mar, a Charter City and a municipal corporation (“City”), and Townsend Public Affairs, Inc (“Consultant”) (collectively “Parties”).

WHEREAS, the City desires to employ a consultant to provide state and federal legislative advocacy services (“Consulting Services”). Said work is to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth below and as described in the scope of services, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the City has initially determined that Consultant is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by City, and Consultant is willing to perform such services; and
WHEREAS, Consultant will conduct all the work as described and detailed in this Agreement to be provided to the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually covenant and agree with each other as follows:

1. CONSULTING SERVICES.

1.1 Scope of Services. The Consultant shall perform the Consulting Services as set forth in the written Scope of Services, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein. Such services shall be provided at the direction of the City.

1.2. City Modification of Scope of Services. City may order changes to the Scope of Services within the general scope of this Agreement consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions. If such changes cause a change in the Consultant’s cost of, or time required for, completion of the Scope of Services, an equitable adjustment to Consultant’s compensation and/or contract time shall be made, subject to the City’s approval. All such changes shall be authorized in writing, executed by Consultant and City. If such a change results in an extension of the term of this Agreement or increases the maximum amount to be paid under this Agreement, no such change shall have any force or effect unless an amendment to this Agreement is approved by the City Council.

2. DURATION OF AGREEMENT.

2.1 Term, Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be effective for an initial period of three (3) years from the date first written above. Upon satisfactory performance and written agreement of both parties, the Agreement may be extended for an additional two (2) year period.

Time is of the essence for this Agreement and each provision of this Agreement, unless otherwise specified in this Agreement.
3 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 2 of 13 ends

2.2 Delay. Any delay resulting from causes beyond the control of Consultant may merit an extension of time for the completion of the Scope of Services. When such delay occurs, Consultant shall immediately notify the Project Coordinator in writing of the cause and the extent of the delay, whereupon the Project Coordinator shall ascertain the facts and the extent of the delay and grant an extension of time for the completion of the Consulting Services when justified by the circumstances provided that no extension of time shall be granted which would extend the time for performance beyond the date specified in section 2.1 above.

2.3 City’s Right to Terminate for Default. Should Consultant be in default of any covenant or condition hereof, City may immediately terminate this Agreement for cause if Consultant fails to cure the default within ten (10) calendar days of receiving written notice of the default.

2.4 City’s Right to Terminate without Cause. Without limiting its rights in the event of Consultant’s default, City may terminate this Agreement, without cause, by giving written notice to Consultant. Such termination shall be effective upon receipt of the written notice.

Consultant shall be compensated for all effort and material expended on behalf of City under the terms of this Agreement, up to the effective date of termination. All personal property remaining in City facilities or on City property thirty (30) days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement shall be, at City’s election, considered the property of City.

3. PERFORMANCE AFTER TERMINATION. Upon termination of this Agreement as provided herein, Consultant shall, within such reasonable time period as may be directed by City Manager, complete those items of work which are in various stages of completion and which City Manager determines are necessary to be completed by Consultant to allow the project to be completed in a timely, logical, and orderly manner. Upon termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, models, photographs, reports, and other materials prepared by Consultant shall be delivered to the City Manager, upon his request, as property of City.

4. COMPENSATION.

4.1 Total Amount. Compensation to Consultant shall be provided in accordance with the rates described in the Fee Schedule contained in Exhibit “B”. Consultant shall bill the City for work provided and shall present a written request for such payment. City shall pay all invoices in arrears and shall in no event be required to pay for any services provided by Consultant in advance. Consultant acknowledges that it is not guaranteed any particular amount of work.

4.2 Additional Services. City may, as the need arises or in the event of an emergency, request additional services of Consultant. Should such additional services be required, Compensation therefore shall be paid to the Consultant in accordance with Scope of Services contained in Exhibit “A.” City and Consultant shall agree to the costs prior to commencement of such work.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Consultant is, for all purposes arising out of this Agreement, an independent contractor. The Consultant has and shall retain the right to exercise full control and supervision of all persons assisting the Consultant in the performance of said services hereunder, the City only being concerned with the finished results of the work being performed. Neither Consultant nor Consultant’s employees shall in any event be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, any 4 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 3 of 13 ends

retirement benefits, workers’ compensation benefits, any injury leave or other leave benefits, Consultant being solely responsible for all such matters, as well as, compliance with social security and income tax withholding and all other regulations and laws governing such matters.

6. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. Consultant agrees and represents by executing this Agreement that it has the financial resources, service experience, completion ability, personnel, and experience in dealing with public agencies necessary for performing the Scope of Services and that such performance shall be in accordance with the standards customarily adhered to by an experienced and competent Consultant using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable Consultants practicing in the same field of service in the State of California. Additionally, Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees or agents shall secure and maintain in force such permits and licenses as are required by law in connection with the furnishing of services pursuant to this Agreement.

7. AUDIT OF RECORDS.

7.1 At any time during normal business hours and as often as may be deemed necessary, the Consultant shall make available to a representative of City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement and shall permit City to audit, examine, and/or reproduce such records. Consultant shall retain such financial and program service records for at least four (4) years after termination or final payment under this Agreement.

7.2 The Consultant shall include the City’s right to audit under this section in any and all of their subcontracts and shall ensure that these sections are binding upon all subcontractors.

8. CONFIDENTIALITY. All Consulting services performed by Consultant, including, but not limited to, all drafts, data, correspondence, proposals, reports, research and estimates compiled or composed by Consultant, pursuant to this Agreement, are for the sole use of the City, its agents and employees. Neither the documents nor their contents shall be released to any third party without the prior written consent of the City. This provision does not apply to information that (a) was publicly known, or otherwise known to Consultant, at the time that it was disclosed to Consultant by the City, (b) subsequently becomes publicly known through no act or omission of Consultant or (c) otherwise becomes known to Consultant other than through disclosure by the City. Except for any subcontractors that may be allowed upon prior agreement, neither the documents nor their contents shall be released to any third party without the prior written consent of the City. The sole purpose of this section is to prevent disclosure of City’s confidential and proprietary information by Consultant or subcontractors.

9. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.

9.1 Consultant shall at all times comply with all federal, state and local conflict of interest laws, regulations, and policies applicable to public contracts and procurement practices, including, but not limited to, California Government Code §§ 81000 et seq. (Political Reform Act) and §§ 1090 et seq. Consultant shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the City in which the Consultant has a financial interest as defined in Government Code § 87103. Consultant represents that it has no knowledge of any financial interests, which would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the City. 5 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 4 of 13 ends

9.2 Consultant shall comply with all of the reporting requirements of the Political Reform Act. The Consultant shall file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700 (Assuming Office Statement) within thirty (30) calendar days of the City’s determination that the Consultant is subject to a conflict of interest code, if applicable. The Consultant shall also file a Form 700 (Annual Statement) on or before April 1, disclosing any financial interests held during the previous calendar year for which the Consultant was subject to a conflict of interest code.

9.3 If, in performing the Consulting Services set forth in this Agreement, the Consultant makes, or participates in, a “governmental decision” as described in Title 2, section 18701(a)(2) of the California Code of Regulations, or performs the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by a City employee holding a position specified in the department's conflict of interest code, the Consultant shall be subject to a conflict of interest code requiring the completion of one or more statements of economic interests disclosing the Consultant’s relevant financial interests.

10. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. All documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by Consultant under this Agreement shall be considered the property of City. Consultant shall be permitted to reference and use said materials for use in future studies, work, and marketing so long as said materials are considered “public documents” and are not subject to attorney-client privilege, or the subject of pending closed or executive session discussions.

11. INSURANCE

11.1 Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Consultant, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Insurance shall be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than “A” and “VII” and are admitted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise approved in writing by the City’s Risk Manager.

11.2 Consultant’s liabilities, including but not limited to Consultant’s indemnity obligations, under this Agreement, shall not be deemed limited in any way to the insurance coverage required herein. All policies of insurance required hereunder must provide that the City is entitled to thirty (30) days prior written notice (ten (10) days for cancellation due to non-payment of premium) of cancellation or non-renewal of the policy or policies. Maintenance of specified insurance coverage is a material element of this Agreement.

11.3 Types and Amounts Required. Consultant shall maintain, at minimum, the following insurance coverage for the duration of this Agreement:

11.3.1 Commercial General Liability (CGL). Insurance written on an ISO Occurrence form CG 00 01 07 98 or equivalent providing coverage at least as broad which shall cover liability arising from any and all personal injury or property damage in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence and subject to an annual aggregate of $2,000,000. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the CGL limiting the scope of coverage for either insured vs. insured claims or contractual liability. All defense costs shall be outside the limits of the policy. 6 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 5 of 13 ends

11.3.2 Commercial Automobile Liability. For all of the Consultant's automobiles including owned, hired and non-owned automobiles, automobile insurance written on an ISO form CA 00 01 12 90 or a later version of this form or an equivalent form providing coverage at least as broad for bodily injury and property damage for a combined single limit of $300,000 per occurrence. Insurance certificate shall reflect coverage for any automobile (any auto).

11.3.3 Workers' Compensation. For all of the Consultant's employees who are subject to this Agreement and to the extent required by applicable state or federal law, a Workers' Compensation policy providing at minimum $1,000,000 employers' liability coverage.

The Consultant shall provide an endorsement that the insurer waives the right of subrogation against the City and its respective elected officials, officers, employees, agents and representatives.

11.3.4 Consulting Liability. Consulting liability (errors and omissions) coverage with a limit of $1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The Consultant shall ensure both that (1) the policy retroactive date is on or before the date of commencement of the Scope of Services; and (2) the policy will be maintained in force for a period of three years after substantial completion of the Scope of Services or termination of this Agreement whichever occurs last. The Consultant agrees that for the time period defined above, there will be no changes or endorsements to the policy that increase the City's exposure to loss. All defense costs shall be outside the limits of the policy.

11.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or selfinsured retentions are the responsibility of the Consultant and must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, or (2) the Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

11.5 Additional Required Provisions. The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

11.5.1 The City, its officers, officials, employees, and representatives shall be named as additional insureds. The City's Additional Insured status must be reflected on additional insured endorsement form which shall be submitted to the City.

11.5.2 The policies are primary and non-contributory to any insurance that may be carried by the City, as reflected in an endorsement which shall be submitted to the City.

11.6 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this Section 11. The endorsement should be on forms provided by the City or on other than the City’s forms provided those endorsements conform to City requirements. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications at any time.
7 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 6 of 13 ends

12. DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION.

12.1 Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend (with attorneys approved by City), and hold harmless the City, and its officers, officials, agents and employees (the “Indemnified Parties”) from any and all claims, demands, costs or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the Consultant, its employees, agents, and subcontractors performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant’s duty to indemnify under this section shall not include liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct by the City or its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees. Consultant's indemnification obligations shall not be limited by the insurance provisions of this Agreement. The Parties expressly agree that any payment, attorney's fees, costs or expense City incurs or makes to or on behalf of an injured employee under the City's self-administered workers' compensation is included as a loss, expense, or cost for the purposes of this section, and that this section will survive the expiration or early termination of this Agreement.

12.2 This indemnity is in addition to any other rights or remedies which City may have under the law or this Agreement. In the event of any claim or demand made against any party which is entitled to be indemnified hereunder, City may, at its sole discretion, reserve, retain or apply any monies due to Consultant under this Agreement for the purpose of resolving such claims; provided however, that City may release such funds if Consultant provides City with reasonable assurances of protection of the City's interest. The City shall, in its sole discretion determine whether such assurances are reasonable.

12.3 Consultant agrees that its duty to defend arises upon an allegation of liability based upon the performance of services under this Agreement by Consultant, its officers, agents, representatives, employees, sub-consultants, or anyone for whom Consultant is liable and that an adjudication of Consultant’s liability is not a condition precedent to Consultant's duty to defend.

13. SUBCONTRACTORS.

13.1 The Consultant’s hiring or retaining of third parties (i.e. subcontractors) to perform services related to the Project is subject to prior approval by the City.

13.2 All contracts entered into between the Consultant and its subcontractor shall also provide that each subcontractor shall obtain insurance policies, which shall be kept in full force and effect during any and all work on this Project and for the duration of this Agreement.

The Consultant shall require the subcontractor to obtain all policies described in section 11 of this Agreement in the amounts required by the City, which shall not be greater than the amounts required of the Consultant.

13.3 In any dispute between the Consultant and its subconsultants, the City shall not be made a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding to resolve the dispute. The Consultant agrees to defend and indemnify the City as described in section 12 of this Agreement should the City be made a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding to resolve any such dispute or should the City incur any costs in responding to third-party discovery requests.

14. NON-DISCRIMINATION. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, 8 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 7 of 13 ends

physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, military or veteran status, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, or any other class protected under state, federal, or local law. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to any class or category protected under state, federal, or local law and shall make reasonable accommodation to qualified individuals with disabilities. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by City setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.

15. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party shall be delivered to the persons listed below. Any such written communications by mail shall be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee five (5) calendar days after the deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted below.

If to City: If to Consultant:

City of Del Mar Townsend Public Affairs, Inc
City Clerk Christopher Townsend, President
1050 Camino del Mar 1401 Dove Street, Suite 330
Del Mar, CA 92014 Newport Beach, CA 92660
16 ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement and any portion thereof shall not be assigned or transferred, nor shall any of the Consultant’s duties be delegated or sub-contracted, without the express written consent of the City.

17. RESPONSIBILITY FOR EQUIPMENT. City shall not be responsible nor held liable for any damage to persons or property consequent upon the use, misuse, or failure of any equipment used by Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees or subcontractors, even if such equipment has been furnished, rented, or loaned to Consultant by City. The acceptance or use of any such equipment by Consultant, Consultant’s employees, or subcontractors shall be construed to mean that Consultant accepts full responsibility for and agrees to exonerate, indemnify and hold harmless City from and against any and all claims for any damage whatsoever resulting from the use, misuse, or failure of such equipment.

18. CALIFORNIA LAW; VENUE/MISC. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. Any action brought to enforce or interpret any portion of this Agreement shall be brought in the county of San Diego, California.

Consultant hereby waives any and all rights it might have pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 394.

19. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Consultant shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and policies of the federal, state, and local governments applicable to this Agreement, including California Labor Code section 1720, et seq., relating to payment of prevailing wages for public works projects, if applicable. Consultant shall indemnify and defend the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability incurred due to any failure on the part of Consultant to comply with any applicable Laws.
9 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 8 of 13 ends

To the extent Consultant is required to comply with prevailing wage requirements, Consultant does hereby acknowledge that they are aware of, have read, and understand the terms and implications of SB 854 and Consultant and any subconsultants ensure that they are familiar with and comply with its requirements. Such requirements include, but are not limited to, the registration requirement with the Department of Industrial Relations, State of California (DIR), pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. As of March 1, 2015, in compliance with SB 854, the City requires all affected contractors and consultants to be registered with the DIR prior to submitting a bid or proposal on any eligible District project. As of April 1, 2015, failure to comply with the requirements of SB 854 by any contractor or consultant, including registration with the DIR pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5, shall be a material breach of this Agreement which may be terminated by the City in its sole and absolute discretion. Where applicable, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.

20. CONSULTANT’S CERTIFICATION OF AWARENESS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT OF 1986. Consultant certifies that Consultant is aware of the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (8 USC §§ 1101-1525) and has complied and will comply with these requirements, including, but not limited to, verifying the eligibility for employment of all agents, employees, subcontractors, and consultants that are included in this Agreement.

21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement sets forth the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the subject matters herein. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written, except as set forth herein.

22. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

No change, alteration, or modification of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, and no verbal understanding of the Parties, their officers, agents, or employees shall be valid unless agreed to in writing by both Parties.

23. NO WAIVER. No failure of either the City or the Consultant to insist upon the strict performance by the other of any covenant, term or condition of this Agreement, nor any failure to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of any such breach of such covenant, term or condition.

24. SEVERABILITY. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision of this Agreement shall not render any other provision unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.

25. DRAFTING AMBIGUITIES. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the decision of whether or not to seek advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each Party. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor of or against either Party by reason of the extent to which each Party participated in the drafting of the Agreement.

26. LEGAL FEES. In the event of the bringing of any action or suit by either party hereto against the other party hereunder to enforce or interpret any of the provisions, covenants or conditions of this Agreement, or arising out of any tortious conduct by either party incident to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or suit shall be entitled to recover all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees. In any action or suit brought to enforce this 10 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 9 of 13 ends

Agreement, the damages available shall be limited to specific performance or other such equitable relief that the court may order.

27. CONFLICTS BETWEEN TERMS. If an apparent conflict or inconsistency exists between the main body of this Agreement and the Exhibits, the main body of this Agreement shall control. If a conflict exists between an applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, order, or code and this Agreement, the law, rule, regulation, order, or code shall control. Varying degrees of stringency among the main body of this Agreement, the Exhibits, and laws, rules, regulations, orders, or codes are not deemed conflicts, and the most stringent requirement shall control. Each Party shall notify the other immediately upon the identification of any apparent conflict or inconsistency concerning this Agreement.

28. EXHIBITS INCORPORATED. All Exhibits referenced in this Agreement are incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.

29. SIGNING AUTHORITY. The representative for each Party signing on behalf of a corporation, partnership, joint venture, or governmental entity hereby declares that authority has been obtained to sign on behalf of the corporation, partnership, joint venture, or entity and agrees to hold the other Party or Parties hereto harmless if it is later determined that such authority does not exist.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
11 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 10 of 13 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first hereinabove written.

CITY OF DEL MAR,
a municipal corporation
By: ____________________________
Ashley Jones, City Manager

TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC
By: _____________________________
Christopher Townsend, President
ATTEST:
________________________________
Sarah Krietor, Administrative Services
Manager and City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Leslie E. Devaney, City Attorney
12 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 11 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
• Develop Legislative Strategy: TPA will assist the City and the City Council Legislative Subcommittee with the annual review of the legislative policy guidelines. TPA will provide recommendations for any changes based on emerging issues in Sacramento and Washington, D.C.
• Implement the Legislative Strategy: TPA will advocate for the City’s legislative agenda utilizing the following methods:
o Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships: TPA has cultivated a network of valuable relationships that will be leveraged to promote the City’s legislative agenda. In particular, TPA will provide expertise with regional, coastal, and housing issues and will help strengthen relationships with relevant officials in these policy areas. o Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan: TPA will engage various techniques to leverage our network of key relationships on behalf of the City:
 Schedule meetings for the City to discuss relevant legislation  Prepare all briefing materials and talking points for the City  Brief legislative offices and stakeholders on the City’s legislative agenda  Follow-up on meetings to ensure commitments and deliverables are being met
o Track Legislation: TPA will monitor and report on legislation that aligns with the City’s key priorities and legislative policy guidelines, especially pertaining to coastal and housing issues.
o Review Testimony and Position Letters: As requested, TPA will provide input or review of the City’s testimony and position letters. o State and Federal Earmark Funding Opportunities: TPA will support the City in its pursuit of state and federal earmark funding by leveraging legislator and staff relationships, as well as responding to technical or administrative questions related to the applications.
• Provide Progress Reports: TPA will confer regularly with the City on all activities. TPA will provide timely electronic reports on the status of all legislative activity, such as bill language, amendments, and committee analyses. In addition to written reports, TPA will be available to the City for conference calls, in-person briefings, and meetings.
13 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 12 of 13 ends

• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports: TPA will prepare and file, on behalf of the City, all applicable state and federal lobbying disclosure reports.
14 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Consulting Services Agreement
For State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services

Page 13 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT “B”

FEE SCHEDULE

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES MONTHLY FEE
State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services
Year 1: $4,000*
Year 2: $4,500*
Year 3: $4,500*
• Develop Legislative Strategy Included
• Implement the Legislative Strategy Included
• Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships Included
• Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan Included • Track Legislation Included
• Review Testimony and Position Letters Included
• State and Federal Earmark Funding Opportunities Included • Provide Progress Reports Included
• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports Included *The monthly fee includes all reasonable business and travel expenses. 15 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Proposal for State & Federal Legislative Advocacy Services | City of Del Mar Page 1 Proposal for State and Federal
Legislative Advocacy Services
May 20, 2024
16 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Proposal for State & Federal Legislative Advocacy Services | City of Del Mar Page 1 May 20, 2024
Emily Torres, Management Analyst
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
Dear Ms. Torres:

Thank you for the opportunity for Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. (“TPA”) to submit our proposal for State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services to the City of Del Mar (“City”).

Identification of the Firm:

Legal Name of Company: Townsend Public Affairs
Principal Office: 1401 Dove Street, Suite 330, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Distance from City Hall: 66 Miles
Telephone Number: (949) 399-9050
Email Address: [email protected]
Contact During Period of Proposal Evaluation:

Name: Olivia Raymond
Title: Business Development Associate
Telephone Number: (949) 399-9050
Email Address: [email protected]
Since its inception in 1998, TPA has earned the reputation as a Champion for Better Communities by providing the experience, resources, and relationships expected from a premier legislative advocacy and grant writing firm while also giving clients the unique brand of customer service they deserve: personal attention, maximum accessibility, and passion for their mission.

Our strategic approach to advocacy and funding is tailored to meet the individual needs of each client by leveraging the breadth and depth of our team as well as our vast network of relationships with key stakeholders and decision makers.
17 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Proposal for State & Federal Legislative Advocacy Services | City of Del Mar Page 2

OVERVIEW OF CONSULTANT
Utilizing this method on behalf of our clients, TPA has shepherded over 150 legislative and regulatory proposals into law and secured over $3.1 billion in grants from state, federal, and local government agencies as well as nonprofit foundations and private companies.

Thank you again for your interest in our firm and your consideration of this proposal. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information.

We have been honored to serve the City since 2021 and we are proud of the numerous legislative and funding achievements TPA has secured on behalf of the City, including more than $6.95 million in competitive state and federal funding for the City’s priority projects. We would be honored to continue to serve the City of Del Mar.

Yours truly,
Christopher Townsend (Authorized to Bind the Firm)
President
18 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Proposal for State & Federal Legislative Advocacy Services | City of Del Mar Page 3

SCOPE OF SERVICES
TPA will utilize the following strategic and comprehensive approach to provide state and federal legislative advocacy services to the City:
• Develop Legislative Strategy: TPA will assist the City and the City Council Legislative Subcommittee with the annual review of the legislative policy guidelines. TPA will provide recommendations for any changes based on emerging issues in Sacramento and Washington. DC.
• Implement the Legislative Strategy: TPA will advocate for the City’s legislative agenda utilizing the following methods:
o Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships: TPA has cultivated a network of valuable relationships that will be leveraged to promote the City’s legislative agenda.

In particular, TPA will provide expertise with regional, coastal, and housing issues and will help strengthen relationships with relevant officials in these policy areas. o Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan: TPA will engage various techniques to leverage our network of key relationships on behalf of the City:
 Schedule meetings for the City to discuss relevant legislation  Prepare all briefing materials and talking points for the City  Brief legislative offices and stakeholders on the City’s legislative agenda  Follow-up on meetings to ensure commitments and deliverables are being met o Track Legislation: TPA will monitor and report on legislation that aligns with the City’s key priorities and legislative policy guidelines, especially pertaining to coastal and housing issues.
o Review Testimony and Position Letters: As requested, TPA will provide input or review of the City’s testimony and position letters.
o State and Federal Earmark Funding Opportunities: TPA will support the City in its pursuit of state and federal earmark funding by leveraging legislator and staff relationships, as well as responding to technical or administrative questions related to the applications.
• Provide Progress Reports: TPA will confer regularly with the City on all activities. TPA will provide timely electronic reports on the status of all legislative activity, such as bill language, amendments, and committee analyses. In addition to written reports, TPA will be available to the City for conference calls, in-person briefings, and meetings. • Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports: TPA will prepare and file, on behalf of the City, all applicable state and federal lobbying disclosure reports. 19 June 3, 2024 Item 12
Proposal for State & Federal Legislative Advocacy Services | City of Del Mar Page 4

FEE SCHEDULE
ALL-INCLUSIVE RETAINER:

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES MONTHLY FEE
State and Federal Legislative Advocacy Services
Year 1: $4,000*
Year 2: $4,500*
Year 3: $4,500*
• Develop Legislative Strategy Included
• Implement the Legislative Strategy Included
• Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships Included
• Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan Included • Track Legislation Included
• Review Testimony and Position Letters Included
• State and Federal Earmark Funding Opportunities Included • Provide Progress Reports Included
• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports Included *The monthly fee includes all reasonable business and travel expenses. 20 June 3, 2024 Item 12
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Amanda Lee, Principal Planner
Karen Brindley, Planning and Community Development Director Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Preliminary Conceptual Plan for Living Levees to Provide Flood Adaptation REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council receive the report from City consultant, Moffatt & Nichol (Attachment A) identifying a Preliminary Conceptual Plan for potential living levees that can provide flood adaptation along the San Dieguito River in accordance with the City’s Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan (Environmental Science Associates 2018).

BACKGROUND:

A living levee is a type of nature-based resilient infrastructure, also known as “green infrastructure,” that uses vegetated berms to absorb and control flood water. Living levees are considered more sustainable and environmentally friendly compared to conventional levees since they can improve water quality, enhance biodiversity, and adapt and evolve over time. Development of living levees along the San Dieguito River as a strategy to minimize river flooding is identified as a priority adaptation measure in the City’s Adaptation Plan adopted in October 2018 – linked below:
https://www.delmar.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/3580/Revised-Adaptation-Plan-perCouncil-May-21 In Fiscal Year 2023-2024, the City of Del Mar was awarded $750,000 in Federal community project funding, as supported by Congressman Mike Levin, for the “Del Mar Climate Resiliency and Access Improvement Project,” a portion of which ($70,000) was allocated to facilitate preparation of the living levee modeling and concepts presented in this agenda report.

City consultant Moffatt & Nichol (M&N) prepared a report (Attachment A) with recommended adaptation concepts for a living levee system along the north and south banks of the San Dieguito River within the boundary of the City of Del Mar. The conceptual plan is intended to facilitate a City Council decision whether to pursue a living levee project and will inform the preparation of grant applications and solicitation of financial 1 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 9 ends

contributions to help finance a new capital improvement program (CIP) special project (or multiple smaller phased CIP projects).

The recommended levee improvements would minimize flood risk consistent with the City’s Adaptation Plan and State guidance. The California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) is currently processing an update to the State guidance for adaptation to sea level rise through a public review process. The new guidance states there is greater certainty and a narrowing range of sea level rise through 2050 (0.8 feet average) when compared to the prior 2018 State guidance and identifies an updated projection of 1.6 to 3.1 feet of sea level rise by 2100 (Intermediate scenario). The new State guidance is based on the current best available science and is scheduled for adoption by OPC at its June 4, 2024, meeting. Consistent with State guidance, M&N designed the preliminary living levee concepts for Del Mar to meet intermediate to intermediate-high sea level rise scenarios through 2100 and considers a range of factors (i.e., extreme storm events, El Nino years, and projected sea level rise).

M&N used their own modeling as well as the Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) modeling developed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), which provides more detailed predictions of coastal flooding due to future sea level rise and storms integrated with long-term coastal changes (i.e., beach erosion and bluff retreat) and coastal storm factors (e.g., tides, waves, and storm surge), which are used for local flood projections including the City’s Vulnerability Assessment (2016), Addendum to Vulnerability Assessment (2018), and Adaptation Plan (2018).

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

M&N identified three living levee conceptual designs for the City to consider to achieve its flood adaptation goals. The levees can each function independently, but have been designed to function as a system to ensure the design meets applicable Federal regulatory standards. The recommendation includes levee improvements along both the north and south banks of the San Dieguito River within Del Mar’s jurisdictional boundary in order to minimize flood risk and avoid exacerbating future flood conditions. For example, if the levee were to be elevated on just one side of the river, during a flood event the floodwater would travel to the side with a lower elevation. Each of the three potential living levees were designed to accommodate the same flow of floodwaters as existing conditions and will have no effect on the floodplain as described below. Implementation will require coordination with the respective property owners, regulatory authorities, and interested persons. Following is a description of each levee conceptual design:

Living Levee #1: North Riverbank along the State Fairgrounds property between Jimmy Durante Boulevard (east boundary) and the existing levee (west boundary) 2 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 3 of 9 ends

The State Fairgrounds property is a low part of the floodplain where the San Dieguito River naturally drains during high floodwater events. M&N recommended a living levee as a green infrastructure concept for flood adaptation on the north riverbank, which is located on the State Fairgrounds property. The living levee improvement would involve slope remediation along the north bank, creation of an earthen levee one to three feet in height above grade, and planting of salt marsh and native vegetation (along the slope above the existing rip rap). Consistent with the San Dieguito River Valley Joint Powers Authority’s public access plan, a flat 10-foot-wide pedestrian pathway could be provided along the top of the living levee to accommodate a pedestrian path within the existing 100-foot-wide public easement that is intended to provide a new westerly trail connection between the State Fairgrounds and Coast to Crest trail.

M&N also recommended additional drainage improvements that could be considered for additional flood adaptation on the State Fairgrounds property behind the levee. City staff will be coordinating with the 22nd District Agricultural Association (22nd DAA) to discuss their vulnerability to flooding and available options to minimize that flood risk, which relate to work in process including the State Fairgrounds master planning effort, feasibility studies, and consideration of potential locations for affordable housing consistent with the 6 th Cycle Housing Element Program 3A and the Exclusive Negotiating Rights Agreement between the City and 22nd DAA that took effect April 15, 2024.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulations prohibit development from increasing flood height in the floodplain. This is also commonly referred to as the FEMA “no-rise” constraint. This means that any levee improvement on the north bank must also take into account the associated effect on floodwater to property on the south bank. Flood control improvements cannot alter the existing floodwater path unless comparable floodwater volume is accommodated. Therefore, the proposed concepts #2 and #3 are also parallel to the river and increase levee height on the south bank to ensure there will be no effect on the existing flow of floodwater in this area of the floodplain.

M&N identified that the recommended living levee flood adaptation improvements would provide flood risk reduction and protection under the following flood condition scenarios:
• Existing sea level and a 10-year and 25-year storm flood event (M&N modeling), which represents existing conditions with a very significant storm flood event during an El Nino year.
• One foot of sea level rise combined with a 10-year storm flood (M&N Modeling), which represents conditions projected between years 2050 (intermediate high) and 2060 (intermediate) combined with a significant storm event during an El Nino year.
3 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 4 of 9 ends

• 2.5 feet of sea level rise with a 1-year storm flood (CoSMoS), which represents projected conditions between years 2070 (intermediate high) and 2090 (intermediate) coupled with an average storm flood event during a “normal” year.

NORTH BANK, STATE FAIRGROUNDS, PROPOSED LIVING LEVEE LOCATION #1 Living Levee #2: Southeast Riverbank along the North Commercial Zone and the City’s Public Works Facility between Jimmy Durante Boulevard (east boundary) and the existing railroad berm (west boundary)
On the south side of the San Dieguito River between the railroad trestle and Jimmy Durante Blvd., M&N recommended a living levee and associated improvements to the existing rip rap to provide better flood protection and protection for the riverbank during storms. As recommended, the existing rip rap would be extended lower into the river and higher onto the riverbank. On the southeast bank, an earthen levee three feet in height above grade would be installed along the top of the riverbank, a flat 10-foot-wide pathway Levee height will vary from
1 foot to 3 feet above grade
Levee #1
north bank
4 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 5 of 9 ends

would be provided along the top of the living levee, and the side of the berm would be planted with native upland vegetation along the slope above the rip rap. Existing elevations within the City’s Public Works yard would be maintained.

Existing public recreation use in this shoreline location would be maintained. The 10-footwide pathway along the top of the living levee would maintain existing pedestrian trail use that is currently provided in this location by one segment of the existing Del Mar Riverpath.

Shoreline fishing is also an additional allowed recreation use in this location that would be maintained.

M&N identified the living levee flood adaptation improvement would provide flood risk reduction and protection under the following flood condition scenarios:
• Existing sea level and a 100-year storm flood (CoSMoS), which represents projected conditions for the most extreme storm flood event during an extreme El Nino year.
• Three (3) feet of sea level rise and a 25-year storm flood (M&N Modeling)– represents projected conditions between years 2080 (intermediate high) and 2100 (intermediate) coupled with very significant storm flood event during El Nino year.

PROPOSED SOUTHEAST BANK LIVING LEVEE LOCATION #2 (EAST OF RAILROAD) Existing
Railroad
Levee #3
southwest
Levee #2
southeast
5 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 6 of 9 ends

Living Levee #3: Southwest Riverbank along the North Beach neighborhood between the railroad berm (east boundary) and the existing parking lot behind the Beach Colony Apartments at 2801 Camino del Mar (west boundary) In this location, M&N identified a hybrid adaptation concept for the City Council to consider including a small living levee and a small floodwall, each two-feet in height:
• Living Levee improvements – Would involve installation of an earthen levee approximately 2-feet in in height above grade. The levee would be located (as shown in cross hatch design in the figure below) between the base of the existing railroad berm and the existing fenced enclosure for the City’s temporary pump facility (City infrastructure) that provides as-needed drainage services during high tides and heavy storms for the public tennis courts and North County Transit District drainage ditch. The new levee on the southwest bank would be planted with native upland vegetation. In addition, earthen material would be placed (on the westerly side of the pump enclosure) in the form of a linear trapezoidal berm along the landward side of the existing Del Mar Riverpath.

Levee height will be
3 feet above grade
6 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 7 of 9 ends

• New Floodwall – Would involve installation of a floodwall 2-feet in height above grade (shown in bold on figure below) that would be located between the new living levee and the north end of the existing parking lot for the Beach Colony apartments (2801 Camino del Mar).

NORTH BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE SOUTH BANK, LIVING LEVEE AND FLOODWALL, LOCATION #3 Levee height and
Floodwall height will be
2 feet above existing
grade
7 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 8 of 9 ends

The proposed improvements would be located on the landward side of the existing Del Mar Riverpath and would maintain public recreation use of the trail in this location.

M&N identified the living levee and floodwall adaptation improvements would provide flood risk reduction and protection under the following flood condition scenarios:
• Existing sea level and a 100-year storm flood (CoSMoS), which represents projected conditions for the most extreme storm flood event. • Three (3) feet of sea level rise and a 100-year storm flood (M&N Modeling and CoSMoS), which represents projected conditions between years 2080 (intermediate high) and 2100 (intermediate) coupled with the most extreme storm flood event.

Next Steps
In summary, the proposed system of three levee concepts to improve flood control for the north bank and south bank along the San Dieguito River within the City of Del Mar will:
• Address the FEMA floodplain “no-rise” constraint
• Address compatibility with existing and planned infrastructure • Address compatibility with existing and planned public access • Provide options to plant new native habitat to support wetland migration • Provide a flood control system that benefits people and nature If the City Council decides to pursue a living levee project, which would include all three concepts, then the next steps would include:
• Preparation of applications for grant funding
• Environmental analysis in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as applicable • Planning and engineering design (various stages)
• Community engagement, including tribal consultation
• Resource agency approvals (Federal and State) including, at a minimum, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), California Coastal Commission (CCC), State Lands Commission (SLC) and potentially California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFG). • Construction
• Post-Construction monitoring/maintenance
M&N advised that FEMA approval will not be required because the levee and floodwall have been designed to comply with FEMA regulations by providing increased height and alignment parallel to the river on both the north and south banks, which ensures that comparable floodwater volume will be accommodated and floodwater flow will not be 8 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City Council Agenda Report
Preliminary Living Levee Concept
June 3, 2024

Page 9 of 9 ends

modified. M&N further recommended not to pursue the FEMA levee certification process because it is not possible to provide FEMA-level protection without significant infrastructure changes in the river valley, including properties that are not owned or controlled by the City (i.e., State Fairgrounds property and the railroad).

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact or action to be taken by the City Council related to this agenda item. If the City decides to pursue a living levee project, the cost is estimated to be up to $30 million, which would mostly be funded by future grants.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

The proposed City Council action does not constitute a “project” under the definition set forth in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 because it will not have a potential to result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA. If the City Council directs staff to pursue implementation of a living levee project (i.e., applications for grant funding, preliminary engineering design, permitting), then project-level CEQA review will be prepared and processed specific to the proposed project scope once defined.

HOUSING IMPACT:

Implementation of a living levee as an adaptation strategy to minimize flood risk to infrastructure and properties in proximity to the San Dieguito River would facilitate housing production on sites that are located in the floodplain consistent with the City’s certified 6
th Cycle Housing Element.

NEXUS TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND PRIORITIES:

This technical report relates to a Tier 2 City Council special project that is part of an existing contract with Moffatt & Nichol for shoreline management including design of a conceptual plan for a living levee, State and Federal permit approvals for a Sand Compatibility Opportunistic Use Permit (SCOUP) program for prospective beach nourishment, and identification of financing strategies.

ATTACHMENT:

Attachment A – Moffatt & Nichol Report
9 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Final
City of Del Mar, CA
Living Levee
Preliminary Conceptual Design
Prepared for
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar May 2024
Del Mar, CA 92014
https://www.freepik.com/author/bonandbon
Prepared by
Moffatt & Nichol
555 Anton Boulevard
Suite 400
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
10 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar i
Table of Contents

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1

2. Local Adaptation and Resiliency Recommendations.................................................... 4

2.1. North Bank, State Fairgrounds............................................................................................... 5

2.2. South Bank along City’s Public Works Facility / Wye Parcel / North Commercial Zone .........6

2.3. South Bank along North Beach Neighborhood.......................................................................8

3. The Path Forward ...................................................................................................... 11

3.1. Applying for Funding ............................................................................................................ 11

3.2. Engineering.......................................................................................................................... 11

3.3. Environmental Review ......................................................................................................... 11

3.4. Permitting............................................................................................................................. 11

3.5. Final Engineering ................................................................................................................. 12

3.6. Implementation and Construction......................................................................................... 12

4. References ................................................................................................................ 13 APPENDIX A: Existing Conditions
APPENDIX B: San Dieguito River Topography Within the City of Del Mar APPENDIX C: Flood Hazards and Projection Scenarios
APPENDIX D: Adaptation Considerations and Measures
11 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar ii
List of Figures
Figure 1: Location Map of Del Mar.................................................................................................................................1 Figure 2: Plan view of the San Dieguito River Valley in the City of Del Mar...................................................................2 Figure 3: Adaptation and Resiliency Locations along the San Dieguito River................................................................4 Figure 4: Proposed North Bank Living Levee Location..................................................................................................5 Figure 5: North Bank, State Fairgrounds Cross Section (looking west), Existing Condition .........................................5 Figure 6: North Bank, State Fairgrounds, Proposed Living Levee Cross-Section..........................................................6 Figure 7: Proposed South Bank Living Levee Location .................................................................................................7 Figure 8: South Bank Cross Section, Existing Condition ...............................................................................................7 Figure 9: South Bank Cross Section, Living Levee........................................................................................................8 Figure 10: North Beach Neighborhood on the south bank, Living Levee/Floodwall.......................................................9 Figure 11: South Bank Proposed Living Levee Cross-section in the North Beach Neighborhood...............................10 Figure 12: South Bank North Beach Neighborhood, Proposed Low Floodwall............................................................10 12 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar iii
Disclaimer
Moffatt & Nichol devoted effort consistent with (i) the level of diligence ordinarily exercised by competent professionals practicing in the area under the same or similar circumstances, and (ii) the time and budget available for its work, to ensure that the data contained in this report is accurate as of the date of its preparation. This study is based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed by Moffatt & Nichol from its independent research effort, general knowledge of the industry, and information provided by and consultations with the client and the client's representatives. No responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by the Client, the Client's agents and representatives, or any third-party data source used in preparing or presenting this study. Moffatt & Nichol assumes no duty to update the information contained herein unless it is separately retained to do so pursuant to a written agreement signed by Moffatt & Nichol and the Client.

Moffatt & Nichol’s findings represent its professional judgment. Neither Moffatt & Nichol nor its respective affiliates make any warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to any information or methods disclosed in this document. Any recipient of this document other than the Client, by their acceptance or use of this document, releases Moffatt & Nichol and its affiliates from any liability for direct, indirect, consequential or special loss or damage whether arising in contract, warranty (express or implied), tort or otherwise, and irrespective of fault, negligence and strict liability.

This report may not to be used in conjunction with any public or private offering of securities, debt, equity, or other similar purpose where it may be relied upon to any degree by any person other than the Client. This study may not be used for purposes other than those for which it was prepared or for which prior written consent has been obtained from Moffatt & Nichol.

Possession of this study does not carry with it the right of publication or the right to use the name of "Moffatt & Nichol" in any manner without the prior written consent of Moffatt & Nichol. No party may abstract, excerpt, or summarize this report without the prior written consent of Moffatt & Nichol. Moffatt & Nichol has served solely in the capacity of consultant and has not rendered any expert opinions in connection with the subject matter hereof. Any changes made to the study, or any use of the study not specifically identified in the agreement between the Client and Moffatt & Nichol or otherwise expressly approved in writing by Moffatt & Nichol, shall be at the sole risk of the party making such changes or adopting such use.

This document was prepared solely for the use by the Client. No party may rely on this report except the Client or a party so authorized by Moffatt & Nichol in writing (including, without limitation, in the form of a reliance letter). Any party who is entitled to rely on this document may do so only on the document in its entirety and not on any excerpt or summary. Entitlement to rely upon this document is conditioned upon the entitled party accepting full responsibility and not holding Moffatt & Nichol liable in any way for any impacts on the forecasts or the earnings from the project resulting from changes in "external" factors such as changes in government policy, in the pricing of commodities and materials, price levels generally, competitive alternatives to the project, the behavior of consumers or competitors and changes in the owners’ policies affecting the operation of their projects.

This document may include “forward-looking statements.” These statements relate to Moffatt & Nichol’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. These statements may be identified by the use of words like “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “should,” “seek,” and similar expressions. The forward-looking statements reflect Moffatt & Nichol’s views and assumptions with respect to future events as of the date of this study and are subject to future economic conditions, and other risks and uncertainties.

Actual and future results and trends could differ materially from those set forth in such statements due to various factors, including, without limitation, those discussed in this study. These factors are beyond Moffatt & Nichol’s ability to control or predict. Accordingly, Moffatt & Nichol makes no warranty or representation that any of the projected values or results contained in this study will actually be achieved.

This study is qualified in its entirety by, and should be considered in light of, these limitations, conditions and considerations.
13 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 1 1. Introduction
Del Mar is a relatively small beach city situated on the Southern California Pacific Coast in San Diego County (Figure 1). The City has a total area of 1.8 square miles (4.7 km2), where 0.1 square miles (0.26 km2) of it (4%) is water, consisting primarily of the San Dieguito River.

FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP OF DEL MAR
Planning for local adaptation and resiliency is an
identified Del Mar City Council priority. The City’s main floodplain area is in the San Dieguito River watershed, which applies to several locations in Del Mar, including the North Beach neighborhood, North Commercial Zone
south of the River and the State Fairgrounds north of
the River. This area is subject to periodic inundation due to flooding with increased flood risk during storm events.

The City completed a Coastal Hazards, Vulnerability
and Risk Assessment (ESA 2016) and Addendum (ESA
2018) that identified vulnerabilities to flooding and
erosion of beaches and coastal bluffs, which are
expected to worsen with sea level rise and climate
change. In consideration of the vulnerabilities identified, the City Council adopted the Del Mar Sea Level Rise
Adaptation Plan (ESA 2018). To minimize risk, the City
is planning to pursue adaptation projects (i.e., beach
nourishment and a living levee for flood adaptation) that can benefit affected properties and the community as a
whole.

Moffatt & Nichol (M&N) was directed to prepare a
preliminary concept for a living levee design along the banks of the San Dieguito River to minimize flood risk
on both sides of the River. This report presents options that enhance flood protection and resilience through
modification of the existing earthen levees along the
riverbanks. It identifies living levee concepts that can be implemented as sustainable, nature-based solutions to
minimize flood risks along the San Dieguito River
consistent with the City’s Adaptation Plan.

The vulnerability of coastal communities to flooding is a pressing concern exacerbated by sea level rise and
changing climatic conditions. In the case of Del Mar
during storm events the San Dieguito River poses the
potential for significant flood risks to several locations in Del Mar north and south of the River. Technical
appendices to this report are provided to support
concept development.
14 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 2 Through community input, and based on sound scientific and engineering principles, the City has identified constructing living levees at appropriate locations along the reach of the River located between the Jimmy Durante Boulevard and the river mouth as a priority approach to minimize flood risk under scenarios of projected sea level rise (State of California 2018). The living levee concepts would address vulnerabilities from flooding along the San Dieguito River, including the North Beach neighborhood near the San Dieguito River mouth, the North Commercial Zone and City’s Public Works facility on the South Bank of the San Dieguito River, and on the State Fairgrounds property on the North Bank of the San Dieguito River. See Figure 2 for locational information.

FIGURE 2: PLAN VIEW OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY IN THE CITY OF DEL MAR A living levee is a flood protection structure designed to mimic natural ecosystems while providing flood risk reduction.

Unlike traditional levees, which are often made of rock, concrete, or steel, living levees incorporate more natural materials such as earth and vegetation such as grasses, shrubs, and trees. These plants help stabilize the soil, reduce erosion, absorb water, and provide habitat for wildlife. Living levees are considered more sustainable and environmentally friendly compared to conventional levees since they can improve water quality, enhance biodiversity, and may be able to adapt and evolve over time. They represent a holistic adaptation to flood management that integrates ecological principles with engineering solutions to create resilient and multifunctional infrastructure and are consistent with best available science and State guidance on climate change adaptation.

In analyzing existing and future conditions for the Del Mar living levees it has been determined that they should not need to be designed to be certified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA certifies levees and flood control infrastructure to be fully protective under the 100-year flood. This lower portion of the San Dieguito River valley is within the 100-year floodplain and it is not possible to provide FEMA level of protection without significant infrastructure changes such as complete protection of the State Fairgrounds, raising of Jimmy Durante Bridge and roadway, and raising of the railroad. These are large-scale and long-term actions are to be implemented by others.

Understanding that these actions may not occur in the time of this shorter-term living levee project, it is recommended that the City pursue living levees that provide significantly improved protection without needing FEMA certification.

City of Del Mar
North Beach
neighborhood
North
Commercial
Zone
State Fairground
Public
Works Facility
15 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 3 Therefore, each concept described herein provides increased protection against flooding from the River, but will not be certified by FEMA and should not need to meet FEMA requirements. The larger and long-term infrastructure projects should integrate living protective components into their designs to provide an elevated level of protection for the City.

However, FEMA should be contacted by the City during design and approval of this living levee project as a coordination effort.

This report provides preliminary recommendations for living levee design concepts based on existing conditions, flood projection scenarios, and adaptation strategies provided in separate technical appendices as listed below. • Appendix A: Existing Conditions
Factors such as river channel characteristics, levee integrity and stability, habitat characteristics, and jurisdictional boundaries are identified. Interviews were conducted with the San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority to coordinate with their Coast to Crest Trail location and its entry monument (Anderson, Personal Communication with M&N). Understanding these conditions provides the foundation for understanding opportunities and constraints.
• Appendix B: San Dieguito River Topography Within the City of Del Mar Topographic and water level baseline physical conditions are addressed in this appendix. • Appendix C: Flood Hazards and Projection Scenarios
Factors that impact flood dynamics in Del Mar are examined to assess current vulnerabilities and project future flood risks. A significant amount of work has already been done in the past by modelers such as Howard Chang to determine flood potential in the area (Chang 2004 and 2014). All of these data were reviewed and considered. Coastal management information, such as tidal data, potential sea level rise forecasts, and regulatory ambitions and constraints, are presented. Subsequently, coastal and fluvial influences, combined water levels, sediment transport, and sea level rise are identified to provide insights for flood projection scenarios. Hydrological and hydraulic modeling, utilizing storm flow simulations combined with sea level rise, are then employed to identify the vulnerabilities of the existing levee system. This comprehensive analysis aids in establishing optimal crest elevations along the levees to mitigate floods of varying intensities and sea level conditions.
• Appendix D: Adaptation Considerations and Measures
The living levee concepts for flood protection consider FEMA floodplain “no-rise” constraints, infrastructure, and habitat options. Concepts are provided for modified levee locations and increased levee heights with options for nature-based and green retention structures, potentially combined with certain grey measures (e.g., floodwall), emphasizing sustainability and ecosystem benefits. Where levees alone cannot avert flooding, additional adaptation measures including sumps, infrastructure floodproofing, and grade raising have also been investigated and identified as options where appropriate for specific adjacent locations. The concepts may not fully protect against the 100-year storm under all future conditions because the levees will tie into existing high-ground which in some cases is not high enough to contain the 100-flood (e.g., existing railroad, Jimmy Durante Boulevard, State Fairgrounds). However, the resilience of the City will be significantly increased against high water and SLR in the future as compared to existing conditions. 16 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 4 2. Local Adaptation and Resiliency Recommendations
This description and accompanying graphics present initial concepts for living levees along the downstream end of the San Dieguito River within the City of Del Mar. The three locations where adaptation and resiliency recommendations for living levees have been provided as shown in Figure 3 include the:

1. north bank living levee on the State Fairgrounds property (Figure 4).

2. south bank living levee along the North Commercial Zone and Public Works yard (Figure 7), and

3. south bank living levee along the North Beach neighborhood (Figure 10).

FIGURE 3: ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCY LOCATIONS ALONG THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER The purpose of this study is to assess how vulnerable the study area is to flooding and to evaluate how effective living levees could be to mitigate the flood risk. M&N evaluated the study area by conducting modeling and analysis per State guidance. The level of flood protection is presented herein for each of the three concepts. This flood risk refers to the magnitude of the flooding scenarios under various storm conditions and projected sea level rise scenarios. Storm flows range from small floods that occur more frequently (1-year or annual event) to larger floods that occur less frequently (10-year, 25-year, and 100-year events). For example, a 10-year storm flood is one that could occur every decade and is more significant than an annual storm flood that may occur once every year. The 100-year flood is the flood condition used by FEMA for regulation of development in floodplains and flood management and is more significant than the 10- year and 25-year floods. M&N conducted numerical modeling of 10- and 25-year storm flows coupled with sea level rise for this study using the same model developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the San Dieguito River.

For sea level rise (SLR), the State dictates that the analyses be based on use of the model called the Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) developed by the U.S. Geological Survey model to determine areas of flooding and inundation under the various SLR scenarios. The use of the State Ocean Protection Council (OPC) Guidance and the CoSMoS model flood maps is the best available science according to the State of California (State OPC 2018). The 2018 State SLR Guidance has been updated in draft form in 2024. This analysis for Del Mar is based on the 2024 updated State Guidance (State OPC 2024).

NORTH BANK

SOUTH BANK
17 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 5 The level of protection afforded by the conceptual living shorelines was determined by analyzing results of both the CoSMoS model and the M&N model for combined conditions of sea level rise and storm flooding. CoSMoS provides results in quarter meter increments and storms of 1-year, 20-year and 100-year return intervals, while the M&N model provides results in increments of 1 foot and 3.1 feet of sea level rise and storms of 10-year and 25-year return intervals.

Analyzing both sets of results provides the City with a more complete set of scenarios to consider for design of the living levees. The living levee concepts are presented below with a brief description with graphics provided for each.

2.1. North Bank, State Fairgrounds
The conceptual design of the living levee at this location is an earthen levee extending along the San Dieguito River bank from Jimmy Durante Blvd to the west end of the existing levee near the railroad, and located within the 100-foot easement on the State Fairgrounds property. Figure 4 shows the location of this levee, and Figure 5 shows the existing condition in cross-section near the mid-point of the reach. The levee would extend for a length of 1,485 feet.

FIGURE 4: PROPOSED NORTH BANK LIVING LEVEE LOCATION
FIGURE 5: NORTH BANK, STATE FAIRGROUNDS CROSS SECTION (LOOKING WEST), EXISTING

CONDITION
The concept along the north bank consists of the following components and the proposed cross-section is shown in Figure 6 and includes the following improvements:

1. Re-grading the slope from the top edge of the existing river bank back towards the northern easement boundary at a slope of approximately 1:6 (Vertical : Horizontal).

EXISTING

ELEVATION
(7’-9’ NAVD88)
VARIES

NORTH BANK

STATE FAIRGROUNDS

NORTH BANK
RIVER BOTTOM @
3 FT NAVD88
18 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 6 2. Installing a 1- to 3-foot-high earthen levee (depending on location) along the rear of the easement up to an elevation of +10 feet above NAVD88 which is an accepted vertical datum that is very similar to Mean Lower Low Water;

3. Including a level area at the top of the levee, referred to as the crest, with a width of 10 feet across the top of the levee for use as a pedestrian path connection to the Coast to Crest Trail, and

4. Planting salt marsh, transitional habitat plants between marsh and upland areas, and upland plants along the bank at an elevation above the existing rip rap.

This concept protects against the future flooding conditions listed below. This is consistent with State guidance as it is a step to implement the City’s Adaptation Plan to increase resilience. a. Existing sea level and a flood of a magnitude between a 10 year and 25-year storm flood (e.g., 15- or 20-year flood) as based on M&N modeling shown in Appendix C and Figure C-9 – this represents existing conditions with a very significant storm flood event during a El Nino year, b. 1 foot of sea level rise combined with a 10-year storm flood event (M&N Modeling, Appendix C, Figure C-9) – this represents conditions predicted to occur between years 2050 (intermediate high) and 2060 (intermediate) as shown in Appendix C, Table 2 and combined with a fairly significant storm event during a El Nino year, and
c. 2.5 feet of sea level rise with a 1-year storm flood event (CoSMoS) – this represents conditions to occur between years 2070 (intermediate high) and 2090 (intermediate) as shown in Appendix C, Table 2 and coupled with average storm flood event during a “normal” year.

FIGURE 6: NORTH BANK, STATE FAIRGROUNDS, PROPOSED LIVING LEVEE CROSS-SECTION

2.2. South Bank along City’s Public Works Facility / Wye Parcel / North Commercial Zone
The concept design of a living levee along the south bank is a relatively narrow feature lying over the existing top of the river bank that is located between the Jimmy Durante Boulevard bridge to the east and the existing railroad bridge to the west. Figure 7 shows the plan view of the location of this levee concept for the south river bank and Figure 8 shows a cross-section of the existing condition. The length of this proposed levee is 1,350 feet long. 19 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 7 FIGURE 7: PROPOSED SOUTH BANK LIVING LEVEE LOCATION
FIGURE 8: SOUTH BANK CROSS SECTION, EXISTING CONDITION
The proposed south bank living levee raises the existing location of the Del Mar River path as an earthen levee from Jimmy Durante Blvd to the railroad berm and is located north of the existing fence line for the City’s Public Works Facility. This levee lies along the existing top of the south river bank with a footprint approximately 35 feet wide from the edge of the river bank depending on location. This width can vary depending on the desired width of the vegetated surface desired for protection and habitat.

The concept design consists of the following improvements:

1. Improve the condition of the existing rip rap and extend it lower into the river and higher out of the river for better bank protection during storms (this can be coordinated with any on-going plans by Southern California Edison to improve this rock slope protection).

2. Maintain the existing elevations within the City’s Public Works Facility.

3. Install an approximately 3-foot-high earthen levee (depending on location) along the top of the existing south river bank up to an elevation of +14 feet above NAVD88.

SOUTH BANK
20 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 8 4. Provide a level area at the top of the living levee, referred to as the crest, with a width of 10 feet across the top of the levee to maintain existing pedestrian trail use within this section of the existing Del Mar River path, and

5. Plant upland plants on the levee slopes but not on the crest.

Figure 9 shows the proposed cross-section of this concept.

FIGURE 9: SOUTH BANK CROSS SECTION, LIVING LEVEE
This concept protects against the future flooding conditions listed below. As indicated for the previous concept, this is consistent with State guidance as it is a step to implement the City’s Adaptation Plan to increase resilience. a. Existing sea level and a 100-year storm flood according to CoSMoS flood maps in Appendix C, Figure C-2 – This represents the most extreme storm flood event for design of a structure exposed to flooding during an extreme El Nino year, and
b. 3.1 feet of sea level rise and a 25-year storm flood as based on M&N modeling shown in Appendix C and Figure C-9 – this represents between years 2080 (intermediate high) and 2100 (intermediate) as shown in Appendix C, Table 2 and coupled with a very significant storm flood event during an El Nino year.

2.3. South Bank along North Beach Neighborhood
The concept design of the levee on the south river bank section along the North Beach neighborhood is recommended as a hybrid approach with both green infrastructure and grey infrastructure components. This proposed levee/floodwall concept west of the railroad would block water from overtopping by the River. It would be intended to simply raise a relatively low spot along the existing river bank that sags from an elevation of +14 feet NAVD88 to +12 NAVD88 between the railroad and the Beach Colony apartments parking lot. The project would raise the entire river bank up to be +14 feet NAVD88 along this entire reach. Figure 10 shows the concept location. 21 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 9 FIGURE 10: NORTH BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE SOUTH BANK, LIVING LEVEE/FLOODWALL The concept design consists of the green infrastructure and grey infrastructure components and includes the following improvements:

1. Green Infrastructure Component - Living Levee Feature:
a. Install an approximately 2-foot-high earthen levee from the existing railroad berm to the existing pump enclosure by adding earthen material in the form of a linear trapezoidal berm along the landward side of the path and the base of the existing railroad berm, and b. Plant the earthen levee as upland habitat.

2. Grey Infrastructure Component – Floodwall Feature:
a. Install a 2-foot-high vertical wall from the living levee to the north end of the parking lot behind the Beach Colony Apartments (2801 Camino del Mar), and
b. Locate the 2-foot-high vertical floodwall along the inboard side of the existing Del Mar River path as shown in Figure 10 above.

The proposed cross-section of the living levee portion of this feature is shown in Figure 11, and the plan view of the floodwall is shown in Figure 12.

PROPOSED FLOOD WALL IS
AT 14’ NAVD88 OR ABOUT 2

FT ABOVE EXISTING GRADE
PROPPOSED EARTHEN NAVD88
BANK IS AT 14’ NAVD88

CREST ELEVATION
WHICH IS 2’ ABOVE

EXISTING GROUND

ELEVATION
22 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 10 FIGURE 11: SOUTH BANK PROPOSED LIVING LEVEE CROSS-SECTION IN THE NORTH BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD.

FIGURE 12: SOUTH BANK NORTH BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD, PROPOSED LOW FLOODWALL This concept protects against the future flooding conditions listed below. As previously indicated, this is consistent with State guidance as it is a step to implement the City’s Adaptation Plan to increase resilience. a. 1.6 feet of sea level rise and a 100-year storm flood according to CoSMoS flood maps in Appendix C and Figure C-4 – This represents more than the most extreme storm flood event for design of a structure exposed to flooding, and

PROPOSED FLOOD WALL IS
AT 14’ NAVD88 OR ABOUT 2

FT ABOVE EXISTING GRADE
23 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 11 b. Three (3.1) feet of sea level rise and a 25-year storm flood according to M&N Modeling in Appendix C and Figure C-9; this represents conditions between years 2080 (intermediate high) and 2100 (intermediate) shown in Table 2 in Appendix C coupled with a very significant storm flood event during a El Nino year.

3. The Path Forward
The path forward includes applying for funding, preparing engineering, conducting environmental review, permitting, final engineering, and implementation and construction for a levee project. This is a major capital improvement project that is expected to require multiple years for permit approval processing, design, and construction.

3.1. Applying for Funding
The City of Del Mar can move forward submitting applications for funding of these living levee concepts and the floodwall to take them to the next step of engineering design, environmental review and permitting. There are several possible grants to target with applications including those advertised by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Resilience Program, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the State of California (Climate Investment Program, Climate Ready Program, Coastal Conservancy Proposition 68, Department of Fish & Wildlife Proposition 1, Ocean Protection Council, and Coastal Commission) as summarized in the Shoreline Adaptation Funding and Financing Strategies (2020).

3.2. Engineering
This report presents concepts that are approximately at the level of 10% for consideration and grant funding applications. Once funding is received, then the design should proceed to levels required for environmental review and permitting work. The level of engineering needed for environmental review is 30% and that for permitting is roughly 65% (see the description of the environmental review and permitting requirements below.) These concepts should therefore be engineered to a level of 30% to initiate the environmental review process and to a level of 65% to initiate permitting concurrent and subsequent to environmental review. The time duration needed to complete the 65% engineering may require a year.

After completion of the 65% engineering and securing of permits, the City may wish to apply for additional grant funding for the 100% and final engineering for construction, the actual construction, and the post-construction monitoring.

3.3. Environmental Review
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) processes will be triggered by this project. The level of CEQA review will need to be determined and may vary from a Mitigated Negative Declaration to an Environmental Impact Report. The duration of this step depends on the level of environmental review required with an MND requiring approximately 9 months to certify and an EIR requiring approximately a year or more to certify.

NEPA should be relatively modest with an Environmental Assessment being the likely level of environmental review required. The NEPA process would be completed during the federal permitting process.

3.4. Permitting
Permitting can be initiated concurrent with CEQA but cannot be completed until CEQA is complete. The agencies that will need to issue permits include the list below that may not be exhaustive as other agencies may also require permits:
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE, Section 404). • Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB, Section 401 Certification). 24 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 12 • California Coastal Commission (CCC, Coastal Development Permit). • State Lands Commission (SLC, Lease of State Lands).
• North County Transit District (NCTD, Encroachment Permit), and • City of Del Mar (City issued Coastal Development Permit and Encroachment Permit).

The permitting process can require between 12 and 24 months to complete and can run concurrently with CEQA and NEPA. FEMA may need to be consulted during project design to clarify that the levees will result in a no-rise determination for floodwaters during the 100-year storm. This concept design was intentionally developed to be consistent with requirements to make a no-rise determination.

3.5. Final Engineering
Final engineering for construction would occur during the permitting process and be completed shortly after the final permit is issued. The engineering should be done to a level of detail enabling preparation of a contractor bid advertisement for construction bids.

3.6. Implementation and Construction
The construction phase would implement construction of the levees. The duration and costs will vary depending on the design and permit requirements. These types of Capital Improvement Projects may experience escalation of costs over the course of the project due to inflation and changes in market conditions. There is inherent uncertainty about future costs of any project. At this point, the estimate of costs to implement the three living levees and the short floodwall may reach up to between $5 Million and $10 Million, depending on a variety of factors including materials, contractor bids, processing costs, etc.
25 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar 13 4. References
AECOM and Moffatt & Nichol. 2020. Shoreline Adaptation Funding and Financing Strategies. City of Del Mar. January 6, 2020, Revised March 3, 2020.

Anderson, Shawna. 2024. Executive Director of the San Dieguito Riverpark Joint Powers Authority, Personal Communication with Carol Eldon and Chris Webb on March 22, 2024, regarding flood levels and Fairgrounds levee elevation recommendations.

Chang, Howard H. 2004. Hydraulics and Sedimentation Study for the San Dieguito River Wetland Restoration Project.

Report prepared for Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, California.

Chang, Howard H. 2014. San Dieguito River Bridge Replacement, Double Track and Del Mar Fairgrounds Special Events Platform (Milepost 242 to Milepost 244), Hydrology and Hydraulic Technical Studies, May 2014.

Environmental Science Associates (ESA). 2016. City of Del Mar Coastal Hazards, Vulnerability, and Risk Assessment, April 2016, and October 2018 Addendum, Del Mar, CA. Prepared for City of Del Mar.

ESA. 2018. City of Del Mar Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan, Del Mar, CA. October 2018. Prepared for City of Del Mar.

State of California Ocean Protection Council. 2018. Sea Level Rise Guidance: 2018.

State of California Ocean Protection Council. 2024. DRAFT: Sea Level Rise Guidance: 2024 Science and Policy Update January 2024.
26 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendices to the
City of Del Mar, CA
Final Living Levee
Preliminary Conceptual Design Report
Prepared for
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar May 2024
Del Mar, CA 92014
https://www.freepik.com/author/bonandbon
Prepared by
Moffatt & Nichol
555 Anton Boulevard
Suite 400
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
27 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX A:

EXISTING CONDITIONS
28 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX A:

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Table of Contents

1. Jurisdictional Boundaries ...........................................................................................A 1

2. River Channel Characteristics ....................................................................................A 2

3. Levee Integrity and Stability .......................................................................................A 4

4. Habitat Characteristics ...............................................................................................A 6

5. Conclusion .................................................................................................................A 7 List of Figures
Figure A 1: Aerial View of the San Dieguito River in the City of Del Mar ................................................................... A 2 Figure A 2: North South Cross Section of the San Dieguito River ............................................................................. A 3 Figure A 3: San Dieguito River Flood (February 21, 1980)........................................................................................ A 4 Figure A 4: Approximate floodway centerline between the Railroad and Jimmy Durante blvd. over the last 30 years. A 5 Figure A 5: San Dieguito River South Bank erosion upstream of the Public Works yard........................................... A 6 Figure A 6: Habitat examples along the San Dieguito River. ..................................................................................... A 7 29 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 1
Existing Conditions
The San Dieguito River drains a 347 square mile watershed. To help regulate the flow of water in the San Dieguito River, the Lake Hodges Dam was constructed in 1919 and located about 20 miles upstream to the east of Del Mar. It reduced the unmanaged drainage area in the lower San Dieguito River to 44 square miles. Earthen levees were built shortly after the dam's construction within the Del Mar San Dieguito River area, to provide additional storm flood control.

However, over the past 100 years, sediment accumulation has significantly reduced the dam's flood control capacity.

This reduction, combined with the anticipated increase in storm occurrences and sea level rise due to climate change, highlights the crucial role of levees in managing flood risks and protecting the surrounding communities.

Climate change has led to increased storm frequency and rising sea levels, which will continue to escalate and result in significant flood damage, particularly in low-lying areas, over time. This section describes jurisdictional boundaries, river channel characteristics, levee integrity and stability, and habitat characteristics resulting from the San Dieguito River and its corresponding floodplain within the City of Del Mar, between Jimmy Durante Boulevard and Camino Del Mar. Areas vulnerable to flooding include the State Fairgrounds on the north bank, and the Public Works Facility / Wye Parcel / North Commercial Zone and North Beach neighborhood on the south bank. For instance, roads and bridges, including Camino Del Mar and its bridge, Jimmy Durante Blvd. and its bridge, the railroad bridge, and streets in the North Beach neighborhood, are at risk. Additionally, infrastructure elements like storm drains, water and sewer systems, and coastal access on-street parking will be affected, along with wetland habitats that experience migration and transition due to flood inundation.

Consistent with its adopted Adaptation Plan, the City of Del Mar is specifically looking at the potential for a living levee along the river banks in the areas within its jurisdiction to manage flood risk. A better understanding of the existing floodplain is essential for determining the level of flood protection that can be provided by levee improvements and related adaptation measures.

1. Jurisdictional Boundaries
The San Dieguito River spans multiple jurisdictions before reaching the City of Del Mar and flowing into the Pacific Ocean. Collaborative partnerships are integral to maintaining the San Dieguito River levee system. This analysis examines the existing conditions for flood potential along the San Dieguito River, with a distinction made between the north bank and the south bank. The north bank assessment covers the shoreline between Jimmy Durante Boulevard and the Railroad Bridge to the west on the State Fairgrounds property. The south bank analysis includes the area between Jimmy Durante Boulevard and the Camino Del Mar Bridge to the west, including the Public Works/North Commercial District and the North Beach neighborhood river bank to the Camino Del Mar Bridge. See Figure A 1. 30 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 2
FIGURE A 1: AERIAL VIEW OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER IN THE CITY OF DEL MAR The State Fairgrounds is located on the north bank and is owned and maintained by the State of California A 100’ wide easement has been defined along the north bank by the State Coastal Commission for public access and to help maintain the health and integrity of the river ecosystem.

The south bank levee between the railroad and Jimmy Durante Blvd is owned and managed by the North County Transit District (NCTD). The levee to the northwest of the Railroad, closer to the ocean, is located in the North Beach neighborhood.

2. River Channel Characteristics
The cross-section of a river at any point will consist of a channel bed with a deeper floodway, or location where floodwaters are expected to flow most rapidly, meandering within it. The channel bed is typically bounded by banks or sloping walls that confine the river’s flow. Beyond the river’s bank are the floodplains, or low-lying areas adjacent to the river, which are subject to periodic flooding. This is an important buffer zone for absorbing floodwaters and reducing flood risk. Vegetation along the riverbanks and floodplains helps provide bank stabilization by reducing erosion. It also provides wildlife habitat and improves water quality.

The San Dieguito River between Jimmy Durante Blvd. and the Railroad exhibits this typical river cross-section (see Figure A 2). The channel bed in this section is bounded by levees on both sides, designed to protect the floodplain from less severe storms. The level of protection afforded is dependent on many factors, including height. These levees influence the behavior of floodwaters and the extent of inundation within the floodplain. 31 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 3
FIGURE A 2: NORTH SOUTH CROSS SECTION OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER The depth of the San Dieguito River channel varies with the seasons, storm events, and dredging activities. Sand enters the mouth of the San Dieguito River during the dry season, while floods flush the river open during the storm driven wet season. The natural channel within the artificially maintained floodway cross-section constantly changes, influenced by sediment loads from tidal movements, upstream erosion, and storm intensity and duration.

A constricted channel, such as the section between the railroad bridge and Jimmy Durante Blvd., affects the degree of flooding. Constrictions generally increase water velocity, leading to more scour during high water events. Accumulated 32 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 4
sand in the channel during low flows is mobilized and pushed out to the ocean during floods, deepening the channel.

A deeper channel can convey more water, thereby increasing its capacity. Overtopping the levee will also increase capacity but may result in significant erosion and structural damage.

When the storm flow is heavier in the San Dieguito River, the constriction between the Railroad and Jimmy Durante Blvd. can cause a temporary backup of floodwaters, increasing the water levels upstream, potentially exacerbating flooding in those areas. Figure A 3 is an example of the subsequent bank overflowing from the significant 1980 storm event. Note the extent of flooding over the State Fairgrounds. It is important that a storm of this magnitude can discharge over the floodplain area to dissipate some of its energy.

FIGURE A 3: SAN DIEGUITO RIVER FLOOD (FEBRUARY 21, 1980) The levees on both the north bank and south bank between Jimmy Durante Bridge and the Railroad help contain normal capacity river flow but are susceptible to periodic flooding during larger storm events when the river exceeds its normal flow capacity and spills over into the adjacent low-lying areas due to their present elevation. The levee protecting the low-lying areas of the North Beach neighborhood on the south bank is higher, offering better protection from larger storms.

3. Levee Integrity and Stability
The existing earthen levees have withstood numerous high flood events that have periodically topped the banks, with some deterioration. The main floodway tends to concentrate its path closer to the south side as seen by the red line depicting the center of the floodway over the last 30 years in Figure A 4. This would suggest the southern bank is more prone to erosion during high water events due to higher flow rates next to the bank. delmarsandpiper.org
33 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 5
FIGURE A 4: APPROXIMATE FLOODWAY CENTERLINE BETWEEN THE RAILROAD AND JIMMY DURANTE BLVD. OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS.
34 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 6
Figure A 5 illustrates the degree of erosion between 2003 and 2022 on this bank due to inadequate protection and the floodway centerline (a thalweg) against the bank.

FIGURE A 5: SAN DIEGUITO RIVER SOUTH BANK EROSION UPSTREAM OF THE PUBLIC WORKS YARD

4. Habitat Characteristics
Habitats along the San Dieguito River provide important ecological functions and support diverse plant and animal communities. These habitats vary along the tidally influenced river corridor. Vegetation along the levees includes a mix of coastal vegetation communities, including trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (grasses, rushes, and succulents) that thrive in a range of soil conditions. This vegetation is beneficial in that it helps stabilize the riverbank, filters pollutants from runoff, and provides habitat for wildlife.

Habitats along the riverbank can affect flow. Upstream wetlands can reduce the sediment load in the channel due to entrapment within the wetland. They can also attenuate floodwaters through water retention. Habitats along the levees can increase flow resistance, trap sediments, control erosion, and enhance infiltration, with these effects being more pronounced in denser habitats.

Habitat health is generally dependent on conservation practices, restoration efforts, and sustainable land management strategies. Collaborative partnerships and community engagement can help foster periodic restoration efforts to help 35 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix A 7
provide habitat restoration where it has degraded or eroded along the river corridor. This may include planting native vegetation, removing invasive species, restoring wetlands and riparian zones, and reintroducing native wildlife species.

The existing habitat along both the north and south banks of the San Dieguito River vary. Figure A 6a, below is an example of a well-established coastal vegetation habitat along the north bank. Figure A 6b is an area that has an opportunity for habitat restoration. Figure A 6c, upstream of the Public Works Facility along the south bank, is well vegetated but experiences more bank erosion due to the proximity of the floodway next to the bank.

FIGURE A 6: HABITAT EXAMPLES ALONG THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER.

5. Conclusion
The existing earthen levees have deteriorated and eroded over time, as expected with age. To enhance their stability and effectiveness, additional bank protection measures, such as a protective rock layer and increased vegetation, are recommended. Elevating the levees to withstand future high-water events and improving the flow area will provide better protection against stronger storms.
36 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX B:

SAN DIEGUITO RIVER TOPOGRAPHY WITHIN

THE CITY OF DEL MAR
37 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX B:

SAN DIEGUITO RIVER TOPOGRAPHY WITHIN

THE CITY OF DEL MAR
Table of Contents

1. Del Mar Floodplain......................................................................................................B 1

2. Flow path and infrastructure planning .........................................................................B 3

3. Existing Bank Weakness Locations ............................................................................B 7

3.1. North Bank of the San Dieguito River........................................................................................B 7

3.2. South Bank of the San Dieguito River.......................................................................................B 9

4. Conclusion ................................................................................................................B 10 List of Figures
Figure B 1: Cropped Image of FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA 2012) ....................................................... B 2 Figure B 2. San Dieguito River Flood (February 21, 1980)........................................................................................ B 3 Figure B 3: Topographic map of Del Mar to the north of the san dieguito river.......................................................... B 4 Figure B 4: topographic map of Del Mar to the south of the san dieguito river .......................................................... B 5 Figure B 5: Topography by specific elevation in NAVD88.......................................................................................... B 6 Figure B 6: North Bank State Fairgrounds shallow parking lot area with storm drain outlet between the railroad and Jimmy durante blvd.................................................................................................................................................... B 7 Figure B 7: State Fairgounds shallow parking lot area with storm drain outlet on the west side of the North Bank... B 8 Figure B 8: Elevation of the Del Mar Fire Station north of the San Dieguito River along Jimmy Durante Blvd. ......... B 8 Figure B 9: South bank elevation low spot................................................................................................................. B 9 Figure B 10: North beach neighborhood on the south bank low spot near the storm drain pump outlet.................. B 10 38 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 1
Topography
Topography refers to the physical features and characteristics of the Earth's surface, including its elevation, terrain, slopes, valleys, hills, and other natural and human-made features. Topographic maps represent these features through contour lines, which connect points of equal elevation, allowing for visualization and analysis of the landscape's threedimensional structure. Topography plays a crucial role in providing essential information for understanding landforms, water flow patterns, and environmental processes. It is used in flooding analysis as follows:

Floodplain Mapping: Floodplains are the areas adjacent to rivers that are prone to flooding during high water events.

By overlaying elevation data onto the floodplain maps, areas at risk of inundation under different flood scenarios can be ascertained.

Flow Path Identification: Topographic maps help identify the natural flow paths of water. Understanding the elevation gradients allows analysts to predict where water will flow during heavy rainfall or when rivers overflow.

Infrastructure Planning: Understanding the natural topographic features informs the design and placement of flood control infrastructure such as levees, floodwalls, and stormwater drainage systems.

1. Del Mar Floodplain
The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) is a key tool used to assess the flood risk for specific areas. It displays flood hazard information which helps guide community planning and development decisions. The map categorizes areas into different flood zones based on the level of flood risk. Figure B 1 is a cropped copy of the FEMA FIRM from 2012. The area over the river designates the floodway or area reserved to allow floodwaters to flow freely to minimize upstream flood levels. Notice that this location extends outside of the existing levees along the San Dieguito River. Any modification to the levees should accommodate this designated floodwater area. The zone adjacent to the San Dieguito River floodway is classified as Zone AE, indicating this area has a 1% chance of flooding in any given year (a storm that generally happens once every 100 years).
39 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 2
FIGURE B 1: CROPPED IMAGE OF FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FEMA 2012) Figure B 2 illustrates the consequences of a flood that might occur once every 35 years. This flood event occurred on February 21, 1980. The photo provides a visualization of the locations of the elevated floodway (visible location of river water) as well as the areas that experienced inundation due to their low levels and proximity to the river. Greenhouse gases are trapping heat from the sun, causing warming. This change in climate will result in more frequent storms and more frequent and intense flood events.
40 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 3
FIGURE B 2. SAN DIEGUITO RIVER FLOOD (FEBRUARY 21, 1980)

2. Flow path and infrastructure planning
The primary flow path is the main route that the river takes as it travels to the outlet. This path is typically the most direct and significant channel for water movement. This path often features higher flow rates and volumes compared to the surface runoff that feeds into it. Topography aids in understanding these flow paths and corresponding runoff directions by providing elevation data, which helps visualize the direction of water flow.

NORTH BANK:

The following topographic map has been color-coded between each contour line to help visualize the different elevations. Figure B 3 illustrates the Del Mar topography on the north bank of the San Dieguito River. As a visualization example, the green areas show land between the 8- and 9-foot contour lines, representing land between 8 and 9 feet NAVD88. (The elevations used in this report are based on the North American Vertical Datum from 1988 [NAVD88]).

The water will flow to lower elevations, so the flow direction is from green, to blue, to purple. 41 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 4
FIGURE B 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF DEL MAR TO THE NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER Reading this color scheme, water from the river will currently enter the north bank State Fairground parking lot with water levels less than 7 feet high (NAVD88). This location along the river can be raised to provide additional protection.

If the elevation of the area within the easement remains as existing, then drainpipes from the low spots within the parking areas going out to the river can be fitted with one-way valves to ensure flood waters do not flow into the State Fairgrounds during high water events. Alternatively, sumps are another option to remove ponded water and pump it back into the river.

The limiting factor on levee height is the elevation of the surrounding land that will not receive an enhanced levee. For the north bank, this location is on the south-west corner of the State Fairgrounds next to the Railroad Tracks. (See Figure B 3). Since this location allows water to enter the State Fairgrounds at around 9 feet NAVD88, a levee that protects for 9-foot NAVD88 flood waters is desirable. A freeboard of one foot is recommended, bringing the north bank levee elevation along the San Dieguito River to 10 feet NAVD88.

SOUTH BANK:

Figure B 4 illustrates the topography on the south bank of the San Dieguito River. The elevation along the bank of the North Beach neighborhood (west of the railroad) generally appears to be above 11 feet NAVD88. The south bank between Jimmy Durante Blvd. and the Railroad is currently protected up to about a 9-foot NAVD88 elevation. The maximum height of a levee to protect the south bank is limited to the lowest elevation of either Camino Del Mar, the Railroad, or Jimmy Durante Blvd. The Railroad appears to provide the limiting protection at just 12 feet. Hence, the proposed levee should protect the south bank between Camino Del Mar and Jimmy Durante Blvd to 12 feet NAVD88 with at least a 1 foot of freeboard. The concept for the living levees was given a maximum elevation of +14 feet NAVD88 to provide slightly more freeboard to protect developed property south of the river and considering elevation limitations discussed in the following section. boundary
City of San Diego
Limiting
low bank
low spot, 7’
NAVD88
42 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 5
FIGURE B 4: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF DEL MAR TO THE SOUTH OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER Another way of visualizing elevations is to look at topographic mapping that shows progressive inundation levels such as depicted in Figure B 5. For instance, looking at the “less than 12 feet NAVD88 elevation,” the railroad next to the San Dieguito River is not completely purple indicating the elevation of the land there is 12 feet or higher. However, looking at the “less than 13 feet NAVD88 elevation,” the entire railroad is purple indicating that the entire elevation of it is less than 13 feet. In this way one can determine the elevation at which the railroad will be overtopped. Since a levee cannot be placed on top of the railroad tracks, this is the limiting elevation for which a levee can provide protection. 43 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 6
FIGURE B 5: TOPOGRAPHY BY SPECIFIC ELEVATION IN NAVD88
44 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 7
Following this same reasoning, Jimmy Durante Blvd gets overtopped between 14 and 15 feet NAVD88, and while Camino Del Mar gets overtopped between 9 and 10 feet, water from the ocean does not affect the North Beach neighborhood until Pacific Ocean levels are above 12 feet NAVD. This indicates that the City is protected along the North Beach neighborhood and the Public Works Facility / Wye Parcel / North Commercial Zone to a level of 12 feet NAVD88 with existing conditions. A proposed levee installed with another 2 feet of elevation could increase the level of protection to water elevations of +14 feet NAVD88.

Looking forward, if either Camino Del Mar, the Railroad, or Jimmy Durante Blvd are raised, the level of protection to the south bank communities can also be increased. The existing bank along the North Beach neighborhood provides protection to at least 15 feet NAVD88. Since Jimmy Durante provides protection to 14 feet NAVD, a berm that protects to 14 feet NAVD88 everywhere except the railroad tracks would be reasonable, and a temporary cofferdam could be placed across the tracks (since flooded tracks cannot be used) through the storm. Therefore, the living levees along the south bank are all designed to be at elevations of +14 feet NAVD88.

3. Existing Bank Weakness Locations
A closer look at the topography along both banks will reveal the existing areas of concern for flood control.

3.1. North Bank of the San Dieguito River
The low spots on the north bank are a result of intentional parking lot grading to a storm drain. The storm drain leads to a river outlet. These elevations indicate that the river water level needs to be lower than 7 feet to drain. Figure B 6 shows the parking area along the State Fairgrounds between Jimmy Durante Blvd and the Railroad. The berm appears to be overtopped at 7-feet NAVD88. Figure B 7 shows the parking area on the west-southwest side of the State Fairgrounds. The berm protecting this lot is higher and appears to be breached at a 9-10 foot NAVD88 water elevation.

FIGURE B 6: NORTH BANK STATE FAIRGROUNDS SHALLOW PARKING LOT AREA WITH STORM DRAIN OUTLET BETWEEN THE RAILROAD AND JIMMY DURANTE BLVD.
45 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 8
FIGURE B 7: STATE FAIRGOUNDS SHALLOW PARKING LOT AREA WITH STORM DRAIN OUTLET ON THE

WEST SIDE OF THE NORTH BANK
Another area of flood vulnerability along the north bank is the location of the Fire Station just to the west of Jimmy Durante Blvd (See Figure B 8). The Fire Station, located in the orange area of the topographic map below, was constructed on an 11- to 12-foot-high parcel of land (see legend). Fire Station flooding would initially come from the river on the west side of Jimmy Durante Blvd. If flood waters increase above 12 feet NAVD88, water east of Jimmy Durante Blvd will contribute to flooding with water that overtops Jimmy Durante Blvd.

FIGURE B 8: ELEVATION OF THE DEL MAR FIRE STATION NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGUITO RIVER ALONG JIMMY DURANTE BLVD.
46 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 9

3.2. South Bank of the San Dieguito River
The south bank of the San Dieguito River has a low spot upstream of the City’s Public Works Facility, illustrated by the green topography (8-9 feet NAVD88) next to the bank shown and enlarged in the box below. (Figure B 9). Topography shows this bank is presently overtopped when the water level is between 9-10 feet NAVD88 (water enters the Wye Parcel).

FIGURE B 9: SOUTH BANK ELEVATION LOW SPOT
The North Beach neighborhood is a residential area that needs protection from future flood risk. Currently, the levee along the south bank between Camino Del Mar (S21) and the Railroad is above 15 feet NAVD88 with a low spot around an elevation of 11-12 feet NAVD88 between the pump enclosure and the railroad (Figure B 10). The North Beach neighborhood, between the coast and the Railroad, generally drains towards the east (towards the railroad tracks) and enters a drainage ditch that collects water and transports it north to the storm drain pump enclosure west of the tracks on the south bank of the San Dieguito River. Flooding in this area is minimized for water levels below 12 feet NAVD88. 47 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix B 10
FIGURE B 10: NORTH BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE SOUTH BANK LOW SPOT NEAR THE STORM

DRAIN PUMP OUTLET

4. Conclusion
Based on topography alone, the height of a levee along the north bank should be at least 9 feet high NAVD88 with a recommendation of 10 feet to include 1 foot of freeboard. The height of a levee along the south bank should be at least 14 feet high NAVD88 in both the Public Works Facility / Wye Parcel / North Commercial Zone and the North Beach neighborhood to enhance protection. Note this recommendation will require a temporary cofferdam over the railroad tracks during severe flood events over 12 feet NAVD88 to maintain the 14-foot NAVD88 protection. 48 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX C:

FLOOD HAZARDS AND

PROJECTION SCENARIOS
49 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX C:

FLOOD HAZARDS AND

PROJECTION SCENARIOS
Table of Contents

1. Coastal Management Information and Relevant Plans.................................................. 1

1.1. La Jolla Tide gauge...................................................................................................................... 1

1.2. Ocean Protection Council Sea Level Rise (OPC SLR) Guidance (2024).....................................2

1.3. Del Mar Adaptation Plan ..............................................................................................................3

1.4. Relevant Plans and Projects Related to Flood Projections .......................................................... 3

2. Coastal/Fluvial Influences.............................................................................................. 4

3. Coastal/Fluvial Flood Hazards (Existing/Projected)....................................................... 6

3.1. CoSMoS Flood Modeling .............................................................................................................6

3.2. Hydrodynamic Modeling............................................................................................................. 12

4. Coastal/Fluvial Flood Hazard Evaluations (Existing/Projected) ................................... 14 List of Figures
Figure C 1: HEC-RAS storm water modeling for 10-yr, 50-yr, and 100-yr return periods ..............................................5 Figure C 2: CoSMoS Storm Flooding Hazard Map (zero sea level rise) for Listed Storm Scenarios.............................7 Figure C 3: CoSMoS Storm Flooding Hazard Map (25 cm or 10 inches of sea level rise) for Listed Storm Scenarios..8 Figure C 4: CoSMoS Storm Flooding Hazard Map (50 cm or 20 inches of sea level rise) for Listed Storm Scenarios..9 Figure C 5: CoSMoS Storm Flooding Hazard Map (75 cm or 30 inches of sea level rise) for Listed Storm Scenarios10 Figure C 6: CoSMoS Storm Flooding Hazard Map (100 cm or 39 inches of sea level rise) for Listed Storm Scenarios...11 Figure C 7: MIKE 21 Model Domain and Bathymetry ..................................................................................................12 Figure C 8: San Dieguito River Peak Flood Discharges and Flood Hydrographs ........................................................13 Figure C 9: Hydrodynamic modeling for the 10- and 25-year storms for 0 ft, 1 ft, and 3.1 ft sea level rise scenarios .14 List of Tables
Table 1: La Jolla Tide Guage Water Levels ...................................................................................................................2 Table 2: State of California Sea Level Rise Guidance 2024 (DRAFT)...........................................................................2 50 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 1
Flood Hazards and Projection Scenarios
A comprehensive range of factors influencing potential flood hazards in the Del Mar area are explored. Drawing from coastal management information and projections, this section provides a detailed analysis of both coastal and fluvial influences resulting from climate change and sea level rise. Through sophisticated modeling techniques and evaluations of existing and projected flood hazards, the aim is to inform the City of Del Mar’s adaptation strategies and resilience planning.

1. Coastal Management Information and Relevant Plans
Global rising temperatures are directly related to increased storm frequency and rising water levels due to the warming of the atmosphere and oceans, which intensifies evaporation, atmospheric moisture content, and storm systems, while also contributing to thermal expansion of seawater and the melting of polar ice, leading to higher sea levels and increased coastal flooding during storm events. While historical influences on water levels were primarily astronomical with secondary geomorphic and climatic factors, the implications of rising temperatures are increasingly driving flood hazard risks, necessitating evaluation and investigation for proactive measures.

1.1. La Jolla Tide gauge
The La Jolla Tide Gauge provides data on water levels, particularly tidal fluctuation, which is essential for understanding coastal inundation risks to the City of Del Mar. The tides in Del Mar are mixed semidiurnal, meaning two high tides and two low tides of different magnitude occur each lunar day (an approximately 25-hour time period). The magnitudes are dependent on a variety of factors including lunar phase, wind patterns, and atmospheric pressure systems.

Astronomical tides account for the most significant amount of variation in the total water level, with Spring tides producing the highest tidal range. Spring tides occur twice per lunar month and result from the combined aligned gravitational pull of the moon and the sun. King tide typically occurs twice a year, when the gravitational forces of the sun, moon, and Earth align to produce the highest predicted tides of the year. In this situation, the moon is closest to the Earth, and the Earth is closest to the sun. “Moon wobble” results in changes to tidal patterns and occurs approximately every 18.6 years. Half of the cycle causes suppressed tides and the other half of the cycle results in amplified tides. The highest “moon wobble” cycle tidal amplification is expected in the mid-2030s. Monitoring the tide gauge data and understanding the astronomical influences provides insight into the dynamic water levels experienced at La Jolla and by analogy, in Del Mar, aiding in the prediction and mitigation of potential inundation risks in the Del Mar area.

The La Jolla Tide Gauge (NOAA Station #9410230), located at the Scripps Institution Wharf in La Jolla, California, has been collecting data since 1924, with the most recent gauge installation in 1988. Key tidal datums, resulting from the average height of the tide recorded at a tide station each day during a 19-year recording period, are listed in Table 1.

Spring tides will result in water elevations above MHHW. The highest and lowest observed tides are more extreme than the highest and lowest astronomical tides, 7.01 feet and -2.20 feet respectively, due to climatic and geomorphic factors in addition to astronomical influences. The best available tidal datum information epoch is from 1983 to 2001.

The tidal datum based on the newest epoch from 2002 to 2020 will be available after 2026. As sea levels rise (SLR), this tidal information will be adjusted to reflect the new water height based on the same fixed reference point. 51 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 2
TABLE 1: LA JOLLA TIDE GUAGE WATER LEVELS
Station: 9410230, La Jolla, CA
Units: Feet
Epoch: 1983-2001
Datum: NAVD 88
Water Level Height Description

7.62 Highest Observed Tide (11/25/2015)
MHHW 5.13 Mean Higher-High Water
MHW 4.41 Mean High Water
MSL 2.54 Mean Sea Level
MLW 0.71 Mean Low Water
NAVD88 0.00 North American Vertical Datum of 1988
MLLW -0.19 Mean Lower-Low Water
-3.06 Lowest Observed Tide (12/17/1933)
Source: NOAA tide datums for La Jolla, CA

1.2. Ocean Protection Council Sea Level Rise (OPC SLR) Guidance (2024) The California Ocean Protection Council (OPC) has developed guidelines and recommendations to address the impacts of sea level rise (SLR) along the state’s coastline. Regarded as the state's best available science, these guidelines provide a framework for state agencies, local governments, and stakeholders to assess vulnerabilities, plan for adaptation, and enhance resilience in response to rising sea levels. Specifically, the guidance provides five sea level scenarios from 2020 to 2150. These scenarios show the greatest predictive certainty to 2050. The uncertainty between 2050-2100 expands due to poorer predictive quantification of emissions pathways and natural physical processes. Beyond 2100, the uncertainties escalate to levels that warrant re-evaluation in the future.

The OPC recommends the evaluation of the intermediate, intermediate-high, and high scenarios to inform appropriate sea level rise planning and project decisions. This report refers to the intermediate to intermediate-high scenarios (Table 2). These scenarios are increasingly influenced by high emissions, which lead to elevated warming levels and consequent polar ice melt. The upper bound of sea level rise by 2100 corresponds with high-end projections considered reasonable to plausible between the intermediate and intermediate-high scenarios.

TABLE 2: STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEA LEVEL RISE GUIDANCE 2024 (DRAFT) Year Intermediate
Sea Level Scenario (feet)
Intermediate-High
Sea Level Scenario (feet)
2030 0.4 0.4
2040 0.6 0.7
2050 0.8 1.0
2060 1.1 1.6
2070 1.4 2.3
2080 1.8 3.1
2090 2.4 3.9
2100 3.1 4.8
Source: 2024 OPC SLR draft document with a water level baseline relative to year 2000. 52 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 3

1.3. Del Mar Adaptation Plan
The Del Mar Adaptation Plan integrates both the California Coastal Commission (CCC) Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance and the 2018 Ocean Protection Council (OPC) Guidance to create a comprehensive strategy for addressing the impacts of rising sea levels. By aligning with the CCC guidance, the plan includes a detailed vulnerability assessment to identify areas at risk of inundation, erosion, and flooding, and prioritizes actions based on the severity and likelihood of these impacts. The plan adopts the CCC's recommended adaptation strategies, such as beach nourishment, sediment management, and infrastructure improvements, while also emphasizing the maintenance of natural shorelines and enhancement of coastal ecosystems. Public participation and coordination with state and local agencies are key components, reflecting the CCC's emphasis on inclusive and collaborative planning processes. Additionally, the adaptation plan ensures consistency with CCC sea level rise policies, providing a regulatory framework to address the challenges posed by rising sea levels.

The adaptation plan also incorporates the latest scientific data and adaptive management approaches outlined in the 2018 OPC Guidance. This includes a phased implementation strategy, allowing for gradual adjustments over time based on new information and changing conditions. The plan focuses on enhancing resilience and sustainability by integrating OPC recommendations on natural system preservation and long-term ecological health. However, the plan does not include planned retreat due to economic, environmental, engineering, social, political, and legal constraints and uncertainties. Instead, the City of Del Mar has determined that the best strategy to reduce flood risks is to investigate and implement programs that protect both public and private low-lying properties. These methods include sediment management and beach nourishment to maintain a wide sandy beach, maintaining the existing seawall flood protection system in the beach-level North Beach neighborhood, river channel modifications, storm drain modifications, and the installation of a new living levee. This approach ensures the protection of critical infrastructure and properties while enhancing the city's overall resilience to sea level rise.

1.4. Relevant Plans and Projects Related to Flood Projections To date, the City has established the following plans and undertaken some large projects to address their vulnerabilities due to climate change, increasing resiliency to rising water levels and corresponding flood risks. • The Del Mar Community Plan is the City’s General Plan that addresses how the community will develop over the next 10-20 years.
• The Del Mar Local Coastal Program is the local plan to implement the California Coastal Act for protection of coastal resources and coastal access and protection from coastal hazards. • The Del Mar Climate Action Plan outlines how the City will reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve its resilience to climate change over the long term.
• The Del Mar Sediment Management Plan guides the development of sediment management adaptation measures to reduce vulnerabilities and flood risks due to beach erosion and river channel deposition. This plan recommends using the Sand Compatibility and Opportunistic Use Program (SCOUP) to address these specific challenges, and the City of Del Mar has nearly obtained resource agency approvals to implement it as of this writing.
• The Camino Del Mar Bridge Replacement Project is a local project that will ensure safety and longevity for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic while improving the hydrology of the San Dieguito River with fewer piles and an elevated structure.
• The California Natural Resources Agency Safeguarding California Plan is a state plan that addresses strategies for climate change adaptation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, prepare for climate change impacts, and enhance resiliency.
53 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 4
• The San Dieguito River Valley Joint Powers Authority Pathway Plan is a regional plan to coordinate efforts among various stakeholders to develop and manage pedestrian, bicycle, and multi-use pathways within the San Dieguito River Valley region.
• The San Dieguito Lagoon Rail Bridge Double Track Project is a regional project that involves raising and expanding the existing railway infrastructure to accommodate growing capacity while also ensuring the region’s transportation network remains safe, reliable, and resilient to the impacts of climate change and rising sea levels.
• The San Dieguito to Sorrento Valley Double Track Project is a regional project proposed to mitigate erosion problems it faces along the Del Mar Bluffs to provide resilience and a secure rail alignment.

2. Coastal/Fluvial Influences
The levees along the San Dieguito River are influenced by both coastal and fluvial factors. The coastal influences include tidal patterns, storm surges, wave action, and sea level rise which all directly impact coastal erosion, sediment transport, and shoreline stability. Fluvial influences involve river flow, sedimentation, and flooding dynamics, which play crucial roles in shaping river channels, floodplains, and adjacent landscapes. The river path is controlled by the levee crest elevations, which either confine the river or allow it to overflow their boundaries, as well as by the FEMA floodway.

Together, these influences interact to shape the geomorphology, ecology, and resilience of the area of impact.

A hydrology and hydraulic technical study was undertaken to assess the effects of the San Dieguito River Bridges and the outcome was that the computed water-surface elevations for the 50- and 100-yr flood at the river mouth are controlled by the backwater elevation and not the predicted sea level by 2100. The Camino Del Mar Bridge replacement report (Kleinfelder, Inc.) concluded that “the effects of the inland floods are significantly greater than the tidal effects and will dominate and control the hydraulic conditions…” Given the levees are farther upstream than the Camino Del Mar and Railroad bridges it can be inferred that the controlling factor for floodwater elevation is fluvial and not tidal.

HEC-RAS modeling completed for the Railroad doubletrack project in 2016 (Figure C 1) illustrates the anticipated water profiles for the San Dieguito River for storms with return periods of 10-, 50-, and 100-years (storms that will likely occur once every 10 years, once every 50 years and once every 100 years, respectively). The maximum water elevation for the 10-year return period is under 9 feet NAVD88. The 50-year return period is under 15 feet NAVD88. Finally, the 100-year return period is under 17 feet NAVD88 with the existing height and configuration of Jimmy Durante Blvd. and bridge. The modeling indicates that the Jimmy Durante bridge constricts the river cross-section and consequent water flow causing a water backup in the area upstream of Jimmy Durante Blvd. 54 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 5
FIGURE C 1: HEC-RAS STORM WATER MODELING FOR 10-YR, 50-YR, AND 100-YR RETURN PERIODS 55 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 6

3. Coastal/Fluvial Flood Hazards (Existing/Projected)
The effects of SLR on storm and non-storm related flooding were evaluated using two different methods. One method was to use results of the Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) version 3.0, Phase 2, to determine flooding. The other method was to conduct separate project-specific hydrodynamic modeling using the MIKE-21 Model. CoSMoS, led by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), is designed to make detailed predictions of coastal flooding and erosion based on existing and future climate scenarios of southern California. It is based on more generalized topographic data for the site. The hydrodynamic modeling done specifically for this project using MIKE-21 developed by the Danish Hydraulics Institute (DHI) illustrates the flooding and inundation depths for two storm scenarios at different sea levels, and it based on more detailed topographic data for the site. Results of both methods are discussed below.

3.1. CoSMoS Flood Modeling
CoSMoS modeling results provide predictions of coastal flooding under non-storm, high spring tide conditions and multiple storm conditions (Erikson et al., 2017). The modeling results are based solely on topography and do not take into account the effect of built structures or future grade changes on hazards within the City. The projections are developed from an initial shoreline mapped from a 2009-2011 State recorded light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data set. The 1-meter (3.3 foot) resolution may not accurately reflect existing conditions, resulting in possibly overstated coastal flooding limits.

CoSMoS provides results for inundation hazards and flooding hazards. The inundation hazard zone describes the areas of daily wetting and drying associated with a spring high tide (which occurs twice monthly) without storm influence. The flooding hazards illustrate the episodic wetting associated with a specified storm wave event. It incorporates the influence of sea level anomalies like El Nino, wave-induced water levels, strong winds, storm surge, and spring high tide combined with future sea level rise. CoSMoS flooding is determined by projected future wave and flood events combined with sea level rise. It should be noted that CoSMoS flood projections within inland areas do not have a well-defined hydraulic connection. It is uncertain precisely how existing flood control measures such as levees have been accounted for in the modeling. CoSMoS does not account for the physical limitation of the volume of water conveyed through a particular connection over a period of time. The amount of overland flooding is limited by friction and any constrictions existing at the hydraulic connections.

CoSMoS projections provide a planning-level tool. Finer-grained, site-specific information key to individual areas will be captured using the AdH hydrodynamic and hydraulic modeling tool discussed in the next section. The following CoSMoS results (through Figure C 6) show the extent of flooding in the project area for no storm, the annual storm, the 20-year storm, and the 100-year storm for various sea level rise scenarios. The results for current SLR indicates that the State Fairgrounds exhibit flooding today during spring tides with increasing flooding for larger storm events, and that the levees are able to withstand overtopping on the south side, although there are significant low-lying areas (in green) that have flood potential if the levees are breached. The results indicate that the south levee is finally breached once SLR is at 2.5 feet for the 20-year storm, however, it likely occurs sooner since CoSMoS does not include water elevations due to river hydraulics and hydrodynamics. Utilizing this information at a planning level, it can be observed that the State Fairgrounds are prone to flooding with existing levee elevations. The area south of the State Fairgrounds has shallow areas that will be inundated with sea level rise and flooding. The time of occurrence will be primarily dependent on the storm scenario and the elevation and erosion-resistance of the levee. If the levees are raised, and the low-lying areas are to remain dry, a mechanized means of water elimination will be required to pump the water from their lower land level to a higher storm water level. 56 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 7
FIGURE C 2: COSMOS STORM FLOODING HAZARD MAP (ZERO SEA LEVEL RISE) FOR LISTED STORM SCENARIOS 57 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 8
FIGURE C 3: COSMOS STORM FLOODING HAZARD MAP (25 CM OR 10 INCHES OF SEA LEVEL RISE) FOR LISTED STORM SCENARIOS 58 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 9
FIGURE C 4: COSMOS STORM FLOODING HAZARD MAP (50 CM OR 20 INCHES OF SEA LEVEL RISE) FOR LISTED STORM SCENARIOS 59 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 10
FIGURE C 5: COSMOS STORM FLOODING HAZARD MAP (75 CM OR 30 INCHES OF SEA LEVEL RISE) FOR LISTED STORM SCENARIOS 60 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C 11
FIGURE C 6: COSMOS STORM FLOODING HAZARD MAP (100 CM OR 39 INCHES OF SEA LEVEL RISE) FOR LISTED STORM SCENARIOS 61 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C12

3.2. Hydrodynamic Modeling
Specific location results were modeled for this project using MIKE 21. This is widely used hydrodynamic modeling software developed by the DHI Group (https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/products/mike-21-3). For riverine modeling, it simulates water flow in various aquatic environments. It provides a two-dimensional representation of flow patterns utilizing hydrological boundary conditions (e.g., inflows, rainfall), bathymetry, water levels, and flow discharges. As with any model, there are limitations based on available user input data, which may affect the accuracy and reliability of model simulations. However, with careful model setup, calibration, and interpretation, MIKE 21 provides valuable insights into riverine dynamics to help inform the decision-making process. The modeling is based on the following domain and existing bathymetry (Figure C 7).

FIGURE C 7: MIKE 21 MODEL DOMAIN AND BATHYMETRY
The peak flood discharge for the San Dieguito River upstream of Jimmy Durante Blvd. Bridge was cited from the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) (FEMA 2012) and includes the 10-, 50, 100-, and 500-year discharges. The 200-year flood was extrapolated. The corresponding flood hydrographs were obtained from a San Dieguito River wetland hydraulic and sedimentation study (Chang Consultants 2004). See Figure C 8. The February 21, 1980 flood results had a peak discharge of 22,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) and a 35-year return period (Chang Consultants 2014). 62 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C13
FIGURE C 8: SAN DIEGUITO RIVER PEAK FLOOD DISCHARGES AND FLOOD HYDROGRAPHS For this study, the hydrodynamic results of two storm scenarios, the 10-year and 25-year, are modeled for sea level elevations of 0-feet, 1-foot, and 3.1-foot, corresponding to a 2024 Draft State OPC SLR guidance level for the years 2060 and 2100 for the intermediate SLR scenario, and 2050 and 2080 for the intermediate-high SLR scenario. (See Figure C 9.) Existing topography was used. The results indicate several things.

1. The existing Jimmy Durante Blvd Bridge causes a constriction of flow to the ocean as evidenced by higher water elevations upstream of the bridge.

2. Flow rate is projected to be reduced with rising sea level as seen with the 3.1-ft SLR 10-yr storm scenario where the water elevation is constant over the reach shown.

3. The State Fairgrounds property is located in an active floodplain vulnerable to flooding from larger storms, as evidenced by the inundation of the State Fairgrounds for various sea levels and storm scenarios illustrated in Figure C 9.

4. The State Fairgrounds property is projected to receive floodwater over a low spot in the levee between Jimmy Durante Blvd. and the railroad during the 10-year storm event.

5. The State Fairgrounds property is projected to receive a second source of floodwater during more intense storms over Jimmy Durante Blvd northeast of the Fire station as evidenced by projections for the 25-year storm events. See Appendix B for topography discussion of this location.

6. The south bank levee receives floodwater through a breach of the levee just upstream of the Public Works Building during 25-year storm events. See Appendix B for levee low spots identified through topography. SLR seems to minimally impact the degree of flooding regardless of elevation gain. This is illustrated by the fairly constant inundation seen between the railroad and Jimmy Durante Blvd. (around 11-12’ NAVD) regardless of SLR for the 25-year storm as shown in Figure C 9.
63 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C14
FIGURE C 9: HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING FOR THE 10- AND 25-YEAR STORMS FOR 0 FT, 1 FT, AND 3.1 FT

SEA LEVEL RISE SCENARIOS

4. Coastal/Fluvial Flood Hazard Evaluations (Existing/Projected) The level of flooding during a storm event is influenced by a complex interplay of characteristics, including precipitation intensity and duration, land surface conditions, and drainage infrastructure. The interaction of all these characteristics is essential for assessing flood risk, developing effective mitigation strategies, and providing resilient management practices. Modeling through both CoSMoS and MIKE 21 indicates the level of inundation that Del Mar can expect now and into the future. It models where storm-induced water levels can be anticipated now and with sea level rise, advising where areas of breaching are likely to occur, and the areas that can expect to be flooded when this happens. CoSMoS 64 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix C15
provides flood scenarios primarily based on SLR and coastal conditions. MIKE 21 provides the hydrodynamic, or fluid flow behavior that results from storms within the watershed, a more accurate result. While SLR influences water level, hydrodynamics dominates the anticipated water level for a given storm level.

The results herein indicate that the north bank will be flooded at 9 feet NAVD88 so a levee at this elevation plus a foot of freeboard (10 feet NAVD88) will provide realistic protection for at least a 10-year storm up until around 2050. A 25- year storm will overtop Jimmy Durante Blvd and enter through the southeast side and cannot be accommodated with a levee along the main part of the San Dieguito River.

The existing south bank levee will withstand 10-year storms including 3.1 feet of sea level rise offering protection until around 2080-2100. However, the water level experienced with a 25-year storm will cause 12-foot high NAVD88 floodwaters to flood part of the Public Works Facility, all of the Wye Parcel, and part of the North Commercial Zone.

The North Beach neighborhood will experience flooding as a result of water inundation from the Wye Parcel over the railroad tracks, but not the south bank levee up to the 25-year storm. A levee constructed to 14 feet NAVD along the south bank will withstand flood events greater than the 25-year storm but will be limited by the height of the railroad tracks, which is around 12 feet NAVD88, allowing water to breach the south bank unless it is closed off during significant storm events.

5. References
Chang, Howard H. 2004. Hydraulics and Sedimentation Study for the San Dieguito River Wetland Restoration Project.

Report prepared for Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, California Chang, Howard H. May 2014. San Dieguito River Bridge Replacement, Double Track and Del Mar Fairgrounds Special Events Platform (Milepost 242 to Milepost 244), Hydrology and Hydraulic Technical Studies. DHI Group (n.d.), MIKE 21. MIKE 21/3 - MIKE Powered by DHI. https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/products/mike-21-3.

DHI Group (n.d.). MIKE 21. MIKE 21/3 - MIKE Powered by DHI. https://www.mikepoweredbydhi.com/products/mike21-3.

Erikson, L., Barnard, P., O’Neill, A., Vitoursek, S., Limber, Pl, Foxgrover, Al, Warrick, J. 2017. CoSMoS 3.0 Phase 2 Southern California Bight: Summary of data and methods. U.S. Geological Survey.

ESA. 2016. City of Del Mar Coastal Hazards, Vulnerability, and Risk Assessment, and October 2018 Addendum, Del Mar, CA. Prepared for City of Del Mar. April 2016.

ESA. 2018. City of Del Mar, Sea-Level Rise Adaptation Plan, Del Mar, CA. Prepared for City of Del Mar. October 2018.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2012). Flood insurance study: San Diego County, California and incorporated areas (Volume 9 of 11) (Flood Insurance Study Number 06073CV009C). Initial countywide FIS effective date: June 19, 1997; revised countywide FIS date: May 16, 2012. 379P-381P.

Kleinfelder, Inc. 2023. Camino del Mar at San Dieguito River Bridge Replacement (Bridge No. 57C-0209) FEDERAL AID NO. BRLS 5356(008) Final Bridge Type Selection Report. Prepared for City of Del Mar. December 2023.

Moffatt & Nichol. 2016. San Dieguito River Bridge Replacement, Double Track and Del Mar Fairgrounds Special Events Platform (Milepost 242 to Milepost 244) 60% Design, Draft Bridge Hydraulics Study. Prepared for HNTB and the San Diego Association of Governments / Federal Railroad Administration. December 2016. 65 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX D:

ADAPTATION CONSIDERATIONS AND

MEASURES
66 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar APPENDIX D:

ADAPTATION CONSIDERATIONS AND

MEASURES
Table of Contents
1 Basis of Design ............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 FEMA Floodplain “no-rise” constraint........................................................................................... 1

1.2 Infrastructure Impacts...................................................................................................................2

1.3 Habitat Options ............................................................................................................................ 2

1.4 Public Access............................................................................................................................... 2 2 Measures ...................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Levees..........................................................................................................................................2

2.2 Floodwalls ....................................................................................................................................3

2.3 Pumps..........................................................................................................................................3

2.4 Sumps..........................................................................................................................................3

2.5 Flood-Proofing.............................................................................................................................. 3

2.6 Raising Grades ............................................................................................................................ 3 Figures
Figure C 1: FEMA Flood Hazard Map of the lower San Dieguito River Floodplain. .......................................................1 67 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix D 1
Adaptation Considerations and Measures
Design considerations for the implementation of levees should integrate sustainable principles to minimize environmental impacts and promote long-term resilience. Regulatory compliance must be addressed in the design, as well as realistic goals for flood control within a floodplain.

1. Basis of Design
The basis of design for improving flood protection in Del Mar through the use of a levee system along the San Dieguito River needs to encompass a holistic approach that addresses FEMA Floodplain “no-rise” constraints, infrastructure impacts, habitat options, and public access considerations. By integrating these factors into the planning and design process, a flood control system can be provided that creates a resilient, ecologically sustainable, and socially equitable levee system that benefits both people and nature.

1.1. FEMA Floodplain “no-rise” constraint
The FEMA Floodplain No Rise Constraint refers to a regulation/condition imposed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) that requires that new development, construction, or modification in flood-prone areas should not result in any increase in flood heights or floodplain areas. For example, hydraulic models for the new Camino Del Mar Bridge and Railroad Bridge have been undertaken to ensure their proposed structure will not constrict floodwaters behind them to meet this requirement. Part of the San Dieguito floodplain is shown in Figure D-1. The State Fairgrounds is part of the floodplain that drains the San Dieguito River during high water events. Note the path of the primary flood zone across the State Fairgrounds. Levee improvement cannot alter this path unless comparable floodwater volume is accommodated elsewhere. Some examples of accommodating more floodwater volume would be to: 1) increase and maintain the depth of the San Dieguito River channel between the north and south banks; 2) increase the width of the floodway; or 3) build a higher levee parallel to the river so it will have no effect on the floodplain as long as the floodwaters are permitted to flow on either side of the levee, accommodating the same flow. The third option is the basis of design of the living levees for this study.

FIGURE D 1: FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAP OF THE LOWER SAN DIEGUITO RIVER FLOODPLAIN. 68 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix D 2

1.2. Infrastructure Impacts
Any roads, utilities, and buildings that have been constructed within the floodplain have the potential to be impacted by flooding. Improving the existing levee system can help alleviate some of the flood risks by improving flood prevention for a larger storm event. Drainage will be a major factor if levees are installed or heights are increased because there are places where the land behind the levee being protected is lower than the elevation of the water, such as on the Fairgrounds property. The usage of pump stations and sumps could be investigated since the drainage area could be impacted. Infrastructure for areas not protected by the levees for the larger storms should be elevated, barricaded, or floodproofed. Efforts will need to be undertaken to minimize disruptions and ensure the integrity and functionality of all infrastructure systems.

1.3. Habitat Options
The levees along the San Dieguito River are covered in a variety of vegetation, shrubs and bushes, and trees. If the levees are elevated, efforts will be made to make them sustainable and a living version of the structure. Ecological assessments may be needed to identify habitats and species of concern within the project area and nature-based solutions that enhance biodiversity should be explored to provide habitat restoration and enhancement opportunities as part of the living levee project.

1.4. Public Access
Public access along the river is very important for recreational, cultural, and economic purposes. As part of a living levee project, elements that enhance public enjoyment and appreciation of the river corridor, such as pedestrian walkways, fishing opportunities, viewing platforms, and interpretive signage should be incorporated.

2. Measures
To address the flood risk in Del Mar and enhance the City's resilience against sea level rise and changing climatic conditions, the following adaptation measures are suggested. A combination of engineering solutions and nature-based approaches are recommended to provide effective flood protection while promoting sustainability and ecosystem benefits. Possibilities include flood protection structures, flood water management, flood proofing, and flood avoidance.

2.1. Levees
One of the primary adaptation measures will involve the modification and enhancement of existing levees along the San Dieguito River. This will include raising portions of the levees to increase their height and effectiveness in mitigating floodwaters during storm events. Additionally, measures to strengthen levee integrity and stability could also be implemented, if needed, to withstand future flood risks.

Levees are typically constructed in low-lying areas prone to flooding. They are built to protect against flooding by containing water within a designated area, reducing the incidence of flooding in the adjacent land. Because the levees are constructed in floodplains, it is important to perform a geotechnical investigation to assess soil conditions and bearing capacity at the levee site to determine foundation and embankment materials, as well as to determine seepage potential and the need for seepage control. The materials chosen for the levee embankment might include earth, clay, sand, gravel, or engineered fill. The material should be locally available, durable, and resistant to erosion. Seepage control, if needed, includes cutoff walls, filters, drains, and drainage blankets, to help prevent internal erosion.

The levee alignment should follow natural topographic features and minimize environmental impacts. The embankment height, slope gradient, and crest width will be dependent on type of material, availability of space, and surrounding elevations and flood potential. External erosion protection from flowing water can be achieved with vegetation, rip rap, or man-made erosion resistance materials, depending on anticipated erosion potential. The elevation of the levees should be above the design water level, where possible. Additionally, environmental impacts and habitat concerns 69 June 3, 2024 Item 13
Living Levee Preliminary Conceptual Design | City of Del Mar Appendix D 3
should be addressed to minimize adverse impacts. The levee should comply with all local, state, and federal regulatory requirements to ensure the levee is resilient and provides environmentally sustainable flood protection.

2.2. Floodwalls
Levees are highly effective at flood control, but their footprint can be large depending on the desired height and their material composition, affecting their slope potential. For constrained areas where levees are too large, the installation of floodwalls may be recommended. These structures can serve as barriers to prevent floodwaters from inundating vulnerable areas, especially in locations with limited space for levee expansion. They generally extend vertically upward with a foundation that can withstand flood pressures and can be made of concrete, sheet pile, and engineered polymers.

2.3. Pumps
Strategic placement of pumps within flood-prone areas can help alleviate water accumulation during high tide and storm events. Pumping systems will be designed to efficiently remove excess water and reduce flood risk in low-lying areas, enhancing the city's overall flood resilience.

2.4. Sumps
Sumps are designed to serve as collection points for excess water, particularly in areas prone to flooding or with poor drainage. Levees and floodwalls constructed to withstand stormwaters may trap runoff within the area being protected.

If these areas are equipped with sump pumps, these systems efficiently remove collected water, redirecting it away from structures and towards designated drainage points or stormwater management systems.

2.5. Flood-Proofing
Flood-proofing measures for critical infrastructure and buildings can be implemented to minimize flood damage and disruption during extreme weather events. This may include retrofitting structures with flood barriers, waterproofing foundations, sealing doors, windows and other pathways, and elevating utilities to reduce vulnerability to flooding.

2.6. Raising Grades
Raising grades in flood-prone areas can provide additional protection against rising sea levels and storm surges. This measure involves elevating the land surfaces to create natural buffers against flooding, reducing the risk of inundation and property damage.

These adaptation measures will be tailored to the specific needs and conditions of each location along the north and south banks of the San Dieguito River, taking into account factors such as flood risk, infrastructure constraints, environmental considerations, and community resilience. By implementing a combination of these strategies, Del Mar can enhance its flood protection capabilities and safeguard the well-being of its residents and infrastructure against future flood events.
70 June 3, 2024 Item 13
City of Del Mar
Agenda Report
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City Council Action:

TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Karen Falk, Principal Engineer
Joe Bride, Public Works Director
Via Ashley Jones, City Manager
DATE: June 3, 2024
SUBJECT: Riverpath Del Mar Extension Project Phase 3 Project Update REQUESTED ACTION/RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive an update on the status of Riverpath Del Mar Extension Project Phase 3.

BACKGROUND:

The Riverpath Del Mar Extension Project Phase 3 (Project) will construct 2,075 linear feet (LF) of pedestrian path along the San Dieguito Lagoon adjacent to San Dieguito Drive.

The Project design includes 700 LF of at-grade decomposed granite (DG) path. The DG portion of the path varies between 4-feet and 5-feet wide (depending on site constraints), is 3-inches deep, and includes recycled plastic lumber trail edging. It will include a cable post fence along the lagoon side of the path. The Project also includes 1,375 LF of atgrade or elevated boardwalk. The boardwalk will be constructed utilizing pier foundations and a 7-foot-wide deck support, with 6-foot-wide composite decking and cable post fence installed on the supports.

At the eastern terminus of the project, pedestrians will be directed to a new safe crossing area behind the relocated stop sign at the intersection of Racetrack View Road and San Dieguito Drive. New delineators, solar-powered flashing stop signs, and thermoplastic striping will be installed to safely convey pedestrians at the end of the boardwalk. No new benches will be added. An area for new trash and recycling receptacles will be added at the eastern terminus to be serviced by City staff.

This Project will close the last remaining gap in the City of Del Mar’s seven-mile Coastal Loop Trail by creating non-motorized access between the Grand Avenue Overlook and the Crest Canyon Reserve Trail. The Project will enhance access to outdoor recreation opportunities, bird watching, photography, and expand opportunities to raise awareness about the environment.
1 June 3, 2024 Item 14
City Council Agenda Report
Riverpath Phase 3 Update
June 3, 2024

Page 2 of 6 ends

Del Mar City CouncilJune 3, 2024

Del Mar City Council
June 3, 2024