Del Mar City Council Meeting Agenda
Del Mar Town Hall
1050 Camino del Mar, Del Mar, California
November 18, 2024 City Council Meeting
INFORMATION RECEIVED
AFTER THE COUNCIL AGENDA
WAS DISTRIBUTED
(“Red Dots”)
1 Melinda Gould
From: Thomas Harrington <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 8:08 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: City Budget Items
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Camino Del Mar Bridge should be placed at the BOTTOM of your priority list.
My friend and Del Mar resident with 50 Years in bridge building says the expansion joints were improperly maintained and filled with concrete, which has caused the cracking. Fixing the existing expansion joints is all that is needed to keep from doing that highly disruptive project to replace the bridge.
Tom Harrington
November 18, 2024 Item 04
1 Denise Galvan
From: Sarah Krietor
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 3:08 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: Red Dot: Item 11 Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential
From: Greg Rothnem <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 3:05 PM
To: Sarah Krietor <[email protected]>
Cc: Ashley Jones <[email protected]>
Subject: Red Dot: Item 11 Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar City Councilmembers
I am submitting this red dot in connection with Item 11 Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential.
Tonight you will be considering spending $20,000 on a contact for services (beyond I believe the initial $40,000 paid to NHA) to further evaluate financing options for undergrounding – in other words what are the alternatives for borrowing for undergrounding.
I attended the latest Finance Committee meeting and I think there are two major takeaways from that meeting:
Takeaway #1: First, While the Finance Committee may have said it is ok looking into financing, there was certainly a number of folks who said we need a lot more information in order to make a decision. So NHA should be tasked with getting all that information. Second, committee members and residents voiced concern re the city taking on debt for this type of project. Some questioned if we should pause undergrounding while we figure this out. On this I think we need to look at alternative ways to fund the project – public/private partnership, special assessment districts, SDG&E financing via additional charge on utility bills over a period of xx years.
Takeaway #2: While the focus of the Finance Committee meeting was on the financing/revenue part some members of the committee and the public said we need to better understand costs since costs are all over the board.
While I agree that we need to figure out how to pay for undergrounding there seems to be an over emphasis on the revenue side of the equation. From what I have observed, there is much less effort devoted to understanding the cost side of the equation. We all know costs of undergrounding are absolutely soaring. The city needs to do an in depth analysis of the costs.
Controllable vs Uncontrollable Costs:
November 18, 2024 ITEM 11
2 There are costs we cost we can control and costs that for now seem to be outside of our control. My understanding is that roughly 45% of the costs are outside of our control (SDG&E and AT&T). However, approximately 46% of the costs are within our control. That is close to $50 million – a big number.
Costs controlled by SDG&E/AT&T: We need to put a focused effort on getting SDG&E/AT&T to provide transparency into their costs. I know the city is doing some things but I think there has to be a sense of urgency/drive on multiple fronts re getting this information. Our efforts should include:
1. Del Mar’s rights under its Franchise Agreement, state Utilities Commission and/or California law
2. Reaching out to other cities to determine what SDG&E has provided
3. Reaching out to contractors who have used SDG&E/AT&T for their projects to see what their costs have been
4. Feedback from our consultant as to the fairness of these costs
5. Discussions with SDG&E leadership re our inability to get information
6. Discussion with California Utilities Commission re SDG&E/AT&T’s refusal to provide cost information Costs within our control: We need a deep dive into these costs as well as ways to reduce costs. Our efforts should include:
1. Reaching out to other cities to determine what their cost have been
2. Reaching out to contractors who have used SDG&E/AT&T for their projects
3. Feedback from our consultant as to the fairness of these costs. If our consultant can’t answer the question, find someone who can.
4. Look at ways to reduce costs including:
• Alternative bidding methods
• Alternative ways to phase the project – smaller size projects may yield more bidders. • In sourcing model where Del Mar does some/all of the work with its own employees - pros and cons of such a model
We simply can’t proceed with a “business as usual” or “that is the way we always have done it” approach on a project where we can control upwards of $50 million in cost. Nothing should be off the table and we have to be open to new ideas of how to deal with this.
This effort will require a lot of work and a focused effort. Therefore, I think the City Council need to give direction to either the Finance Committee and/or UPAC to dive into this can determine: 1) Financing alternatives other than borrowing; and 2) How we can control/reduce costs.
Greg Rothnem
[email protected]
(858) 449-0575
November 18, 2024 ITEM 11
1 Denise Galvan
From: Sarah Krietor
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 1:46 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: Red Dot on Undergrounding
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
From: Stephen Quirk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 1:45 PM
To: Sarah Krietor <[email protected]>
Subject: Red Dot on Undergrounding
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
HI Sarah,
Please include this comment for tonight's meeting.
I strongly urge the council to request more information on unit costs and materials with regard to the undergrounding project. Given the tremendous cost increase and the corresponding impacts of elevated debt levels and massive delays, the very sensible thing to do is to take a quick pause and get more information.
There is nothing to lose in doing this.
Additionally, there are troubling signs on the Utility Undergrounding Committee with the departures of member Michael Minter who quit in protest due to poor city process and communication and the underhanded removal of committee member Steve Voss. Council should take note that there is something rotten in the state of Del Mar undergrounding.
Steve Quirk
November 18, 2024 ITEM 11
1 Denise Galvan
From: Don Moser <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 1:33 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Public comment
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am a resident of Del Mar and reside at 226 24th street I am requesting that the city council provide unit costs of the key materials for the undergrounding proposal as advocated by Dan Quirk
Given cost estimates a re so high a deep dive into the unit cost is appropriate and prudent ‘ Thanks
Don
Don Moser
858.229-3456 (M) 858-523-2087 (O)
405 S. Highway 101, #150, Solana Beach, CA 92075
www.retailinsite.net | Lic #00821359
November 18, 2024 ITEM 11
City of Del Mar
City Council and Staff
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
November 14, 2024
Red Dot for Item 11
Subject: Financial Safeguards and Oversight for the Undergrounding Project
Dear Mayor, City Council Members, and Staff,
For disclosure, I live in UUD X1A, scheduled to be undergrounded next year.
The Citywide Undergrounding Project presents both opportunities and significant financial risks. As stewards of public funds and its future, it is imperative that the City implements robust financial guidelines to address the potential long-term burden this project may impose, including risks to future generations. The Finance Committee must play a central role in reviewing these risks and presenting clear financial safeguards for Council consideration and resident approval.
Why Financial Oversight Is Critical
• Significant Risk: Project costs exceed $105 million (base), with inflation potentially increasing total obligations to $172 million over 30+ years. • Future Generational Impact: Long-term financing could burden future residents with substantial debt for infrastructure they may not directly benefit from.
• Revenue Vulnerabilities: Measure Q revenues, while steady, are dependent on economic stability and face risks from recessions or regional projects like tunneling through Del Mar.
• Reduced Options: A commitment of this magnitude significantly limits the City’s ability to respond to future crises, which history shows are likely over a 30- year horizon.
• Forecasting Uncertainty: The project’s history makes it clear that it is not prudent to rely on SDG&E forecasts as sound. Cost estimates have consistently escalated due to inflation, labor shortages, and design complexities. Committing to substantial debt without robust safeguards leaves the City exposed to even higher future costs.
• Inadequate Analysis for example Sensitivity Analysis: The limited sensitivity analysis only extends the timeline with a 0.5% change in costs but fails to provide updated net present value or total project costs. This implies the November 18, 2024 Item 11
project is advancing regardless of expense. Separately, I have written to request that common financial analysis tools, including probability models, be used to capture and fairly present the risks and costs.
Role of the Finance Committee
To protect the City’s fiscal health and uphold fiduciary responsibility, we must pause this project and allow the Finance Committee ample time to lead a comprehensive review of financial risks and propose formal guidelines for Council and resident consideration. These guidelines should include:
1. Debt Limits and Reserve Requirements:
o Cap annual debt service at no more than a set percentage of projected Measure Q revenues.
o Maintain a reserve fund equivalent to a set ratio of debt service to ensure stability during economic downturns.
o Establish clear guardrails, codified as government code, to restrict this and future Councils from incurring excessive debt or continuing the project if fundamental assumptions change, such as:
Costs exceeding a defined threshold.
Measure Q revenues dropping by a set percentage.
2. Phased Financing Strategy:
o Borrow incrementally, aligning expenditures with available revenues to reduce interest costs and mitigate financial risks.
3. Alternative Options:
o Evaluate Pay-Go funding, scaling back the project scope, or ceasing Measure Q taxation and refunding unspent funds if the project proves financially untenable.
Public Engagement and Transparency
Given the magnitude of this decision, residents must have a direct voice. I strongly recommend that all financial commitments, including debt issuance and taxation changes, be placed on a ballot for voter approval. Transparent communication through workshops and forums will foster community trust and alignment with shared priorities.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
Conclusion
This project’s success depends on thoughtful financial oversight. By tasking the responsible and most appropriate committee—made up of citizens with Council liaisons—the Finance Committee can develop comprehensive guidelines that allow the City to address risks proactively and establish safeguards that protect Del Mar’s fiscal future while honoring its commitment to residents.
Pause this project to allow for more informed dialogue and consideration by the appropriate committee—the Finance Committee.
Thank you for prioritizing financial prudence in this critical initiative.
Sincerely,
W. Tate Scott
1200 Oribia Rd
Del Mar, CA 92014
AREA X1A
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Robert Silva
From: CHARLES PINNEY <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:11 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Underground Section UX1A
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Time is of the essence. The initial impetus for city wide underground projects was the high fire danger to Crest Road (X1A) and environs during Santa Ana wind conditions. The additional benefit is to reduce electrical outages due to wind and trees falling. Delay has increased the cost projection dramatically. The city should figure out cost cutting measures as much as possible and finance the Crest Canyon project immediately. This phase should have been first on the list of projects.
If anyone would like to interview me about our private project on Kalamath Drive some 8-10 years ago, I would be happy to offer advice.
Thank you,
Charles Pinney
727 Kalamath Drive
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Dolores Davies <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 4:05 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: David Druker; Tracy Martinez; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk Subject: Red Dot ⬤—Nov. 18 Council Meeting, Item #11
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
City of Del Mar
City Council Agenda
November 18, 2024
Item #11, City Undergrounding Financing
Red Dot Letter
Note: This letter has been signed by 45 Del Mar residents.
Dear Mayor Druker & Council Members:
As residents of Crest Road and the adjacent streets within and near Utilities Undergrounding District (UUD) X1A, we urge you to please direct staff to move forward with an accelerated financing option so that our utilities in this critical area can be undergrounded as soon as possible. While we certainly support the continued undergrounding of utilities in all Del Mar neighborhoods, the project that is ready to go and has the greatest urgency is clearly the construction of UUD X1A.
Because of the wildfire-related public safety issues, the Crest Road/Crest Canyon UUD was deemed a high priority by the Council in August 2019. In December 2023, the Council voted unanimously to authorize City construction of UUD 1A and X1A on a go-when-ready basis. Both the City’s UPAC and Finance committees have recommended that the City explore financing options to keep X1A undergrounding on a go-when-ready schedule. At the City’s recent Finance Committee meeting, Laura De Marco, chair of the City’s Finance Committee, pointed out that the additional financing costs incurred in completing UUD X1A pale in comparison to the economic devastation that could occur if utilities were to cause a wildfire that engulfed Del Mar.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 We realize that the City is facing challenges in terms of funding the undergrounding of utilities in Del Mar neighborhoods, due to the unanticipated inflation of construction and SDG&E costs. But, the costs of delaying this important project are not only risky from a public safety perspective, they could also add significant new costs, since engineering design plans have a limited life and environmental studies are tied to the engineering design. It could also be possible that the categorical exemption to CEQA that X1A is receiving might not be achievable again if the current engineering design is allowed to lapse and new environmental studies are required.
Thank you for considering our perspective and our sense of urgency.
Sincerely,
Richard & Dolores Davies Jamison
Crest Road
Barbara & Joe Harper
Crest Road
Shirley King & Art Olson
Avenida Primavera
Beth Levine
Crest Road
Judy & Marc Schuckit
Kalamath Drive
Sally & Ron Taylor
Crest Road
Rosanne Holliday
Crest Road
Tom & Jackie Bruskotter
Crest Road
Ula Tuszewicka
Crest Road
Linda & Frank Chisari
Crest Road
November 18, 2024 Item 11
3 Mark Raby
Crest Road
John Graybill
15th Street
Joan & Craig Brown
Crest Road
Suzi & Stan Resnik
Crest Road
River Cohen
Crest Road
John Winfield
Crest Road
Scott & Lisa Renner
Via Alta
Steve & Ellen Mitgang
Crest Road
Barb & Tim Davis
Kalamath Drive
Howard Appel
Crest Road
Susan & Don Instone
Crest Road
Gloria Sandvik & Harold Feder
Crest Road
Judd & Susan Halenza
15th Street
Julie Singletary
Crest Road
Allan & Susan Wegner
Crest Road
November 18, 2024 Item 11
4 Tom Hollander & Delene St. John
Crest Road
Jason Dempsey
Crest Road
Fran & Nick Frost
Crest Road
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Williamson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 7:38 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: November 18 Red Dot Item 11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council:
Please vote to find a way to fund Undergrounding District X1A. We are counting on that as a part of San Dieguito Drive improvements which have been approved by the City.
Thank you.
Gill and Ann Williamson
1352 Oribia Road
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Caitlin Rae <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 10:32 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Item 11 11/18/24
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
It is clear the City is at a crossroads and must choose a path and stick to it in order to complete the entire undergrounding project. It is also clear the costs of the undergrounding project will only continue to increase making a decision on 11/18/24 even more imperative.
Besides the scenarios outlined in the agenda item, I would like to remind the Council Members of other unintended ancillary costs associated with all of the options.
Just a few months ago, the residents of San Dieguito Drive and Oribia Road voted to create an assessment district to bring SDD into the public road system for the City of Del Mar on the expressed promise that the road will be reimagined at the conclusion of the Canyon Crest undergrounding project set to begin in fall 2024 and completed in 2025. In October of 2024, we all received our property bills with the first installment of the assessment district fee included. All of the materials, public meetings, and expressed opinions of the Council Members and staff communicated to the SDD residents that the undergrounding would be completed and the road fixed at the completion of the undergrounding. At no time was there mention (all the way up to the voting period in August 2024) that the City did not have enough money to move forward with the Canyon Crest undergrounding project. Based on this expressed promise of a new road, the residents relied on that promise and created the assessment district.
If the City Council chooses scenario 1 (pay as you go), the undergrounding for UUDX1A (Canyon Crest) will not begin until 2027 to be completed in 2029. We residents will require the City fix and repair SDD prior to 2027. This will cost the City additional money because the assessment district was formed under the guise the road repair will cost 1.3 million total. As you have seen with the undergrounding project, inflation, supply, and costs will continue to cause projects to increase in cost.
If the City Council chooses scenario 2 or 3, the UUDX1A project will not begin until 2025 and be completed by the end of 2026. As mentioned above, the residents believed and were not told otherwise that the undergrounding will be complete by 2025 and SDD will be repaired in 2025. Paying assessment fees for 2 years (through 2026) without seeing a repaired and drivable SDD is unacceptable. What if someone decides to sell their house during that time, they will never realize any benefit from the assessment district. Again, under any of these last two scenarios, the cost to make a new SDD at the end of 2026 rather than early 2025 will cost the city more money.
So as you set your course on November 18, I implore you to make good on the promises to the SDD residents that whichever course you choose, that repairs be made to SDD immediately. Now that the assessment district has been formed, the road is public, it is total disrepair (as mentioned in all of the written materials provided by the City) putting all of the residents and users of the road on notice that it is in a dangerous condition should there be an accident or some other casualty.
Sincerely,
November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 Caitlin Laipenieks
1340 Oribia Road
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 1:32 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Letter for Agenda Item #11 - City Council Meeting - 18 Nov 2024 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Red Dot Letter for Agenda Item #11 - City Council Meeting – 18 Nov 2024 Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential Funding Options Dear Del Mar City Councilmembers:
As a member of the UPAC Finance sub-committee for the last 18 months, I’ve attended six meetings with City Staff as we’ve worked together to fine tune the UP financial plan. A potential future shortfall of measure Q revenues was identified by Staff, reviewed by the UPAC Finance sub-committee, and presented to UPAC on 14 Sep 2023. At that time, the shortfall was estimated to occur in 2027 at the earliest. City Staff began exploring financing options that could be considered if the DMCC determined that expedited completion of the UP was a priority for the City. The official UP webpage states, “The City is committed to advance the UP as quickly as possible.”
After receiving much higher-than-expected construction estimates for UUD 1A from SDG&E in Mar 2024 and from the city contractors in May 2024, the UP financing forecasts were re-calculated by Staff and it became clear that in order to complete construction of UUD X1A (Crest Canyon) in 2025/2026, financing would have to be approved by DMCC. City Staff, in collaboration with the UPAC Finance sub-committee, presented three potential financing scenarios to UPAC on 24 Sep 2024. UPAC voted unanimously to recommend Scenario 3 (Accelerated Financing) to the City Council. This option makes it possible to complete the city-wide undergrounding of our utilities as soon as possible. This is the fairest and best option for the residents of Del Mar.
The residents voted for Measure Q in 2016 because they knew it was the best way to accomplish city-wide undergrounding. In Apr 2018, when the City Council evaluated the City’s goals and priorities, residents again expressed their support for city-wide utility undergrounding with Red Dot letters and oral statements. The City Council affirmed the UP as a priority in Sep 2018.
All the residents of Del Mar have been contributing financially to Measure Q since 2017. We have finished construction of a small pilot project (Tewa) and started construction on the first major district (1A – Stratford South – 464 residences). It would be unfair to the rest of the city to put the brakes on the UP at this point. We should aim to finish the city-wide project as soon as possible so that everyone can benefit without further delay. With 30-year terms for loans, Measure Q funds can handle debt service and construction costs so that we can potentially complete the entire city in 20 years. Because of the staging of the UP over time, we can aim for the fairest, fastest plan and re-evaluate the assumptions of our financial plan at four more future decision points as further facts emerge before beginning the design and construction of Districts 2-5.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 The decision before the City Council today is whether to recommend that the City further explore financing the construction costs of UUD X1A and UUD1B so that both districts can be completed as soon as possible.
Reducing wildfire risk in Crest Canyon is one of the more obvious benefits of the UP. Choosing to finance UUD X1A now would underground the utility poles in the canyon and up on the ridge four years sooner. The design for X1A is now complete and postponing construction for four years would also require an expensive redesign.
The scenic beauty of Del Mar will be dramatically improved by utility undergrounding. Once a utility pole is removed, the scenic benefits never depreciate. The unobstructed views will benefit future generations of residents and visitors forever.
What’s harder to quantify is the value of expediting our enjoyment of this improved scenic beauty. A simple calculation illustrates the potential benefits of Scenario 3 using the objective criterion of “Residence Years” – the number of years earlier that each residence in Del Mar will be undergrounded if the City chooses Scenario 3 instead of Scenario 1.
This choice would save 11K residence years. This means that – on average - each affected residence in Del Mar will enjoy the benefits of undergrounding about 6 years earlier if the City proceeds with Scenario 3. When comparing the NPV (Net Present Value) of Scenario 1 vs. Scenario 3, the projected cost of accelerated financing is $10 million in exchange for 11K residence years of added scenic beauty. This amounts to $875 per residence year.
I hope the DMCC will join UPAC in recommending that financing the UP construction costs should be considered as part of our community plan for completion of the UP “as quickly as possible.” Everyone in Del Mar is already contributing to the Measure Q fund and utility undergrounding is already under construction. It would be unfair to delay the completion of the UP when we have the income stream from Measure Q available to complete the project 15 years earlier. Opportunities to re-evaluate financing decisions before future districts begin the design process significantly reduce the financial risk for the City.
Sincerely,
Amy Cheshire
San Dieguito Drive
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 6:46 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot November 18, 2024 - Item 11 - Utility Undergrounding CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council Members:
As residents of Crest Road within Utilities Undergrounding District X1A, we support all the reasons outlined in the red dot submitted by Richard and Dolores Davies Jamison “to move forward with an accelerated financing option so that the utilities in this critical area can be undergrounded as soon as possible. This project is ready to go and has the greatest urgency.”
In a visit to our property by several members of the Del Mar Fire Department to assess our property’s fire risk before the last fire season, we were advised that our greatest risk was from Crest Canyon.
Thank you for your consideration and appreciation of the sense of urgency.
Respectfully,
Bertha and Robert Leone
728 Crest Rd
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: mark rittenbaum <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 10:02 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot comments to Financing of Undergrounding CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
At the last Finance Committee meeting, a number of comments, questions and concerns were raised by committee members and the public, which were not addressed.
Some of these questions/comments follow, and are meant to assist the City Council and the public in making informed decisions on financing options ( including continue to pay as we go):
1) Background: Mitigation of Fire hazard vs public views- for each of the under grounding zones, please identify the relative fire hazard safety risk using an independent rating system. Is the next phase indeed an extremely highly rated risk? Are there other areas of extreme risk, where there will be a greater sense of urgency to complete on sonething other than pay as you go.
2) Financial overview - please a provide a current and pro forma balance sheet, debt maturity schedule, credit rating , and credit capacity for the City. Address how adding debt under either option 2 or 3 affects the City’s credit rating and ability to incur additional debt for other potential needs. 3) Since the debt will an obligation of the City ( and not just recourse to Measure Q funds), please explain the guardrails that ensure that only monies from Measure Q will be used to service debt or otherwise fund under grounding . Are there any potential negative scenarios, where funds beyond Measure Q could be required to service debt, under the currently contemplated financing schemes ?
4) Sensitivity analyses and downside scenarios- please provide more extreme scenarios, and their implications. Things can be far worse than illustrated, and with a reasonable likelihood of it being so. For instance, under option 2, assume the cost is say $20 million, and we have a number of years of negative tax revenue growth ( another pandemic, city severely impacted by rail realignment). Under scenario 3, assume inflation is 2.5% greater than the model, and a few years of negative tax growth per the above.
5) Observations, personal impressions- Hopefully the finance committee can explore some non traditional or public/ private options. Under the currently contemplated structure, where the debt is 100% financed by the city and an obligation recourse to city, it is hard for me to imagine a scenario where it is prudent for the city to continue to study or incur the magnitude of debt contemplated under option 3. 6) The tail or the dog- It appears there is a sense of urgency to reach a decision related to option 2 . A decision to put on close to $20 million of debt, with significant downside risks to both the cost and revenue assumptions, and where existential threats to the City exist, should not be taken lightly. Let’s be sure the Finance Committee and City Council are allowed to do its diligence before taking on any debt, even if it were to potentially delay the next phase. Let’s not have the tail wag the dog.
7) Stop, Look, Listen ? Is there any merit in better understanding the our costs and ways to control them before proceeding full steam ahead?
I realize the hour is late to receive and address all the above comments at the meeting. Yet I would appreciate that staff and our financial advisors attempt to do.
Respectfully,
Mark Rittenbaum
Sent from my iPhone
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 10:28 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Letter # 2 for Agenda Item #11 - City Council Meeting - 18 Nov 2024 Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Red Dot Letter # 2 for Agenda Item #11 - City Council Meeting – 18 Nov 2024 Agenda Item #11 - Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential Funding Options Dear Del Mar City Councilmembers:
This is my 2nd Red Dot letter on this agenda item. I wrote a detailed Red Dot letter yesterday expressing my support for obtaining financing to expedite the completion of the Undergrounding Project.
This second letter is to protest Dan Quirk’s disappointing e-blast yesterday. It is full of misinformation about the UP that seems to be designed to cause concern and turmoil in Del Mar. A lot of what Dan wrote is misleading at best and untrue at worst. I have communicated several times with Dan in private about changing the tone of his e-blasts. I believe they are contributing to a negative atmosphere of paranoia and distrust in our community.
From my personal experience working on three UPAC sub-committees over the last two years, Del Mar City Staff is extremely competent, hard-working and collaborative. When Dan insinuates that the City is “being deceptive” and “putting out misleading information,” he is unfairly maligning Staff. In our working meetings, the highest priority has always been placed on clear, transparent communication of the facts surrounding the UP. Unfortunately, Dan is not communicating in his e-blasts with the same respect for accuracy that Staff has put into their agenda report for this meeting.
Before the 24 Sep 2024 UPAC meeting, Cit Manager Ashley Jones suggested to the members of the UPAC finance subcommittee that it might be best to present the newly updated and extremely complicated UPAC financial plan for the first time at the public UPAC meeting. The purpose was to make sure the presentation could be reviewed in its entirety without interruption and then discussed publicly before a recommendation was made by UPAC to the DMCC. We all agreed.
Dan stated in his e-blast that Michael Minter resigned in protest the day before the September UPAC meeting because the Staff financial report wasn’t released until the day of the meeting. That is not what Michael wrote in the surprising and baffling resignation letter we received the day before the UPAC meeting. He wrote, “Good evening, I am resigning from the UPAC Committee following tomorrow's meeting. I don't feel that I am receiving the level of detail to be able to add any value to this committee and frankly, I can't handle the pace of the undergrounding initiative. Furthermore, I was removed from the UPAC finance subcommittee through a contrived scheme made to look organic which was really weird to say the least.” Michael didn’t attend the UPAC meeting the next day.
In fact, it was Michael who made the motion to resign from the UPAC finance sub-committee in June. After receiving dramatically higher cost estimates from SDG&E in late March, Terry Gaasterland suggested at the public meeting that UPAC would benefit from having Shirli Weiss, a lawyer with experience in such matters, on the finance sub-committee. I November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 offered to resign from the finance sub-committee to make room for Shirli’s expertise. After some discussion, it was Michael who offered to resign. Somehow, this public event has been mis-remembered as a “contrived scheme” to oust Michael from the finance sub-committee. It wasn’t.
Dan also insinuated in his e-blast that there was a conspiracy to remove UPAC member Steve Voss from the committee. Steve had been absent for 5 of the 7 UPAC meetings held since UPAC re-started in Feb. 2023. The City has a policy that requires an appointed member to be removed from an advisory committee for non-attendance if they miss three meetings in a year without cause. Steve missed 3 of the four meetings in 2023 and 2 of the three meetings so far in 2024.
I am grateful to Steve Voss and Michael Minter for their past service on UPAC and I’m also grateful to the two candidates who have stepped forward to fill the two vacancies on our roster. UPAC has a lot of work ahead of us and we need involved, committed members.
Dan wrote in his e-blast that “The City-wide cost in 2019 was $26 million, and today it is now $106 million … and the City is being deceptive about important metrics.” These statements are untrue and should be retracted.
The City Staff report presented to the DMCC on 5 Aug 2019 concluded the following:
“All of the previously-considered scenarios showed that it is possible to fund the full cost to underground all utility poles using Measure Q revenues along with completing the redevelopment of Shores Park, both with long-term financing or PAYGO, with the variation yielding completion time frames ranging from 12 to 26 years, and costing in a range of $61 to $95 million (including construction cost escalation and financing costs where applicable).” Construction cost inflation since 2019 has been high and the pandemic delayed the UP for several years, but the current cost and schedule estimates are still in the same ballpark as they were in 2019. The most dramatic cost increase has been from the SDG&E estimates received in March 2024 and Staff and UPAC are actively taking steps to control SDG&E’s costs.
1) Shirli Weiss was added to the UPAC finance sub-committee in June and her legal expertise helped develop a plan for working with SDG&E to control costs.
2) Staff are actively working to obtain more detailed cost information from SDG&E. 3) To better understand the City’s rights and entitlements to information under the CPUC rules and regulations, the City has engaged special legal counsel.
4) After a recent City meeting with SDG&E executive staff, the City and SDG&E management will begin meeting quarterly starting in December 2024,
5) SDG&E has committed to providing the City with more detailed cost information along with timely updates regarding changes in costs
6) Additional actions to memorialize the partnership between the City and SDG&E regarding the City’s Undergrounding Program are underway.
In conclusion, I would just like to say that the residents of Del Mar deserve to have City Council members who communicate accurately and truthfully with them and in a tone that promotes civility and does not unfairly malign the characters of our City staff, councilmembers and our community volunteers.
Sincerely,
Amy Cheshire
San Dieguito Drive
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 10:35 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: David Druker; Tracy Martinez; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk; Ashley Jones; Martin Boyd Subject: Item: Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential Funding Options
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Clerk:
Kindly enter the following red dot email into the public record for today’s meeting. Thank you.-Shirli Weiss Item: Citywide Undergrounding Program Financial Analysis and Potential Funding Options Dear City Council and Del Mar fellow-citizens,
I am a long time resident of Del Mar and have practiced law in California for over 40 years.
Since September of 2023 I have served on the Undergrounding Project Advisory Committee and in January of 2024 I became its Chair.
Early project estimates and selection and ordering of districts for undergrounding occurred before my tenure. I live in District 1A, undergrounding in process.
I agree with the goals that persuaded over 66% of Del Mar citizens to vote for the project: improved fire safety and scenic enhancement..
I write in response to Counsel member Quirk’s blast email entitled “City Council Meeting on Undergrounding - Costs Explode from $18 million to $200+ MILLION - Mismanagement Abounds” Many of the questions Councilmember Quirk raises in his blast, as usual, are legitimate; many have been asked and answered at Council; Councilmember Quirk’s accusation of mismanagement on the part of the City or its staff, however, is both irresponsible and unwarranted.
Estimates
As I understand it, before my first-hand experience, the City asked for and received updated projections for the project in 2019, some from professional consultants, within a wide range and made a project estimate. The estimate was made in the earlier days of the pandemic when it was not possible to project either the length of the pandemic nor its impact on construction and other third party costs nor to project the increase in costs from a number of other variables also not controlled or influenced by the City, e.g., the extent of increase in SDGE estimates and billings was not foreseeable.
The Actual Costs Thus Far
Actual costs of the initial project, (TEWA) and updated projected costs of UUD 1A have significantly exceeded consultant projections. Accordingly, the City staff has timely updated the projections for the entire project.
There are two principal reasons for the increases: (1) SDGE substantially increased billings and projections and the (2) An increase in the City’s out-sourced construction costs. Neither of these causes were the November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 result of mismanagement by the City or its staff, instead, the Staff has worked diligently and expeditiously to both update projections, continue to manage the project and initiate an inquiry on these causes.
SDGE:
The extent of increase in SDGE’s estimates and billings was not foreseeable in my opinion and the City is not clairvoyant. SDGE took the City by surprise and likely delayed conveying information on increases that it had before it sent out updated estimates and bills. It thus far has supplied an inadequate and vague explanation for the increases. SDGE is supposed to be passing on to the City only its “Actual Costs” under PUC Rule 20.
As reported to the Finance Committee, the City has requested a detailed explanation of billed costs and projections and has retained specialized PUC council to advise it. SDGE has resisted conveying meaningful information in the past. It is a regulated monopoly and so the usual customer/vendor relationship does not exist here. The City must and is consulting with its attorneys and will be mindful of PUC guidelines and other legal means to obtain detailed information if it is not voluntarily shared, and to challenge it if challenge is merited. In this regard, inquiry about all of SDGE’s actual costs, including design, construction, labor, equipment, overhead, credits due to the City, “ enterprise costs” and “supply chain challenges” impliedly tied to the pandemic, is legitimate.
However, any refusal by SDGE to supply PUC-allowed information (which it has done in the past) most certainly cannot be attributed to City “mismanagement ” and Councilmember Quirk’s accusation is unwarranted and unsupported. To the contrary, the Staff is diligently pursuing the needed information.
City’s Construction Costs.
The other major component of cost increase is the City’s cost of construction. For 1A, the City employed a bidding process that is set by law. Multiple bids were received. The lowest qualified bid was accepted.
Increases in bids were in line with increases in the construction cost index which were greater than general postpandemic inflation. As has been explained in City Council meetings, in the case of City construction costs (unlike with SDGE) it would not yield any change to determine what estimate the successful bidder used for widgets and equipment in its bids, the process does not call for them to itemize to that level of detail and still requires the City to select the lowest qualified bid even if some widget has a 100% markup. Councilmember Quirk (and Finance Committee member Minteer) have proposed that the City take the project in-house. I would be opposed to that adventure for more reasons than I can list in this email, but I am not a decision maker and thus far those gentlemen have not persuaded the majority of the City Council to have the City undertake the role of general contractor.
Bottom line: this major cause of the increase, as with the SDGE factor cannot be attributed to City “mismanagement ” and Councilmember Quirk’s accusation is unwarranted and unsupported.
As to the desirability of accelerating the project and her other points, eloquently expressed, I agree with UPAC Vice-Chair Amy Chesire’s red-dot email. As Amy notes, the City Council is being asked for a limited commitment today, as Amy notes:
“Because of the staging of the UP over time, we can aim for the fairest, fastest plan and re-evaluate the assumptions of our financial plan at four more future decision points as further facts emerge before beginning the design and construction of Districts 2-5. The decision before the City Council today is whether to recommend that the City further explore financing the construction costs of UUD X1A and UUD1B so that both districts can be completed as soon as possible.” (emphasis added).
This a limited “ask” and well supported.
I appreciate the dialogue and comments of my fellow-Del Mar residents and ask that they remain respectful to the city council members and City staff.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
3 Thank you for your attention.
Respectfully submitted,
Shirli Weiss
551 Stratford Court
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Steven McDowell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 12:27 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Letter for Agenda Item #11 - City Council Meeting - 18 Nov 2024 Attachments: Pages40and41toOct22Meeting.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To: Del Mar City Council
Within the backup support to Item 11 is the following;
Finance Committee Recommendation
On October 22, 2024, the Finance Committee received a presentation from staff and NHA Advisors and recommended the City Council authorize staff to further explore financing options, including 15-year, 20- year, and 30-year loan options, and return to the Finance Committee. The Finance Committee also requested the City Council direct staff to analyze the impact of separating the financing of UUDs X1A and 1B.
Included with tonight's agenda was some of the backup NHA provided to the finance committee, but not all. In the packet to Finance, there was a detailed breakdown by year for each scenario, attached is Scenario 3. Please continue to provide this type of look for all other options.
At the Finance Committee meeting, I expressed my concerns that 30-year bonds should not be an option. I will continue to voice that belief. Those concerns were based on my own experience as a public official with the Del Mar School District and my experience as one of many parents who spoke up prior to the approval of San Dieguito School District Prop AA. Views that were heard, with one of the outcomes bond terms being limited to 25 years or less.
Those beliefs have only been reinforced after; creating my own sensitivity analysis on the impact of different financing terms and rates for doing the undergrounding, looking at other bond prospectus NHA has been involved with, and reading in the press worries Gen Z’s have regarding irresponsible debt levels that will become their responsibility.
Assuming one of the outcomes of Task Order 1 was to provide the city with a financial model, before starting a new task, please ensure the current model works, by reporting out the prior results with; 1) All current scenarios with the same endpoint. Future value is as important as present. 2) Guardrails including probable reserve funds and/or costing of bond insurance 3) Including know administrative cost differences. Bond financings has additional reporting, insurance, and outside support, for example, NHA. These costs could be substantial. 4) Expected issuance cost is something that has an immediate reduction on what is raised.
Once that’s achieved my recommendation on changes to Task Order 2 would be; 1) Add to the first bullet after call provisions, expected issuance cost\ 2) Remove Financing 101 and instead specifically state those things we need NHA to do. 3) Remove the words 2-3 in-person meetings. Based on, I am assuming the cost we paid for two people not based in San Diego to be at the Finance Committee meeting, that won’t be money well spent In closing, while I felt spending time discussing the cost to Underground wasn’t in the scope of what we/me could address within our responsibilities of being on the Finance Committee. I personally believe SDGE and other parties will substantially benefit from undergrounding now versus 20 years from now. And where there is a mutual benefit there should be mutual cost-sharing and/or partnerships. For example, ATT&T already at their own expense did underground to November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 place fiber along lower Zuni and SDGE has several strategic undergrounding initiatives in place to enhance the ability to respond to wildfires.
Steven McDowell
November 18, 2024 Item 11
November 18, 2024 Item 11
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: Brian Orcholski <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 11:04 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Brian Orcholski
Subject: Re: Item #11 - UUD X1A Financing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I recently learned about a possible delay in the city wide underground electrical project for Crest Road. As a new resident to Del Mar (715 Crest Road), I’m concerned about fire exposure from high winds and down trees. It seems like Crest Road should be considered as high priority due to high exposure to wind and down power lines.
I’m hopeful that the City will make the correct decision on securing financing and move the Crest Road underground project on schedule and at a high priority. I’m not understanding how Stratford Court is under construction and is a higher priority while Crest Road is not funded and now possible delays to 2029? Kind Regards,
Brian Orcholski
Vice President, Controller
DUAL North America, Inc.
CA License Numbers: 0E67776, 6004835, 0D12148, 0F71916, 2F71916, 0E24669, 0I67798, 0I06638 Office: +1 619-664-4221 | Mobile: +1 858-603-0621
350 10th Avenue, Suite 1450, San Diego, CA 92101
[email protected]
**Please note our email address has changed.
Catalytic Risk Managers & Insurance Agency LLC. is a subsidiary of DUAL North America, Inc www.dualna.com | Follow us on LinkedIn
Part of Howden Group Holdings
This electronic message contains information from the offices of DUAL North America, Inc. and its subsidiaries that may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not an addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the Sender.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Melinda Gould
From: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: Red Dot. Nov. 18 Council Meeting, Item #11 From: Francis V. Chisari <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 12:43 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Red Dot. Nov. 18 Council Meeting, Item #11 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello,
We apologize for not including you on the Red Dot email we sent to the City Council members yesterday evening. We hope you will include this Red Dot in the official record.
Thank you,
Linda and Frank Chisari
1010 Crest Road
From: Francis V. Chisari <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 7:39 PM
To: David Druker ([email protected]) <[email protected]>, Tracy Martinez <[email protected]>, Terry Gaasterland <[email protected]>, Dan Quirk <[email protected]>
Subject: Red Dot. Nov. 18 Council Meeting, Item #11
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
We write to encourage you to keep Utilities Undergrounding District X1A on track for installation as scheduled and as planned.
UUD X1A is arguably the most urgently needed of all the undergrounding projects because it will protect the entire City from Santa Ana-driven wildfires. Such fires have been triggered at least twice in our memory by fallen power lines along the western rim of Crest Canyon during heavy windstorms. And we’re sure you remember that the Witch Creek Fire in 2007 came close enough to Crest Canyon to require evacuation of the homes west of Crest Canyon which, had they caught fire, would have threatened the entire City.
We hope you agree that a vote to proceed with UUD X1a as currently planned would be a vote to protect all of Del Mar from Santa Ana wind-driven firestorms, not just the homes in UUD X1A. We believe the potential cost of such a tragedy to all the citizens of Del Mar, not only in November 18, 2024 Item 11
2 dollars but, possibly, also in human life, justify moving forward urgently and without delay.
Please vote accordingly.
Sincerely,
Linda and Frank Chisari
Crest Road
P.S. A longstanding commitment prevents us from attending the Council meeting tomorrow in person.
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Sarah Krietor
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: FW: Red Dot Letter from Utility Specialists - Item 11 Attachments: 111824 Letter to City.pdf
Importance: High
From: Ashley Jones
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 1:18 PM
To: *City Council Group <[email protected]> Cc: Martin Boyd <[email protected]>; Joe Bride <[email protected]> Subject: Letter from Utility Specialists - Item 11
Importance: High
Dear City Council,
Attached is a letter submitted by Utility Specialists Vice President, Duane Stroobosscher, today further explaining and confirming the information contained in the agenda item for Item 11 regarding their cost estimates in 2016 and 2019 being incomplete. This is in response to some misinformation circulating in the community, and is consistent with what Utility Specialists have previously explained publicly on several occasions. The letter will be processed shortly as a red dot communication.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Best regards,
Ashley Jones
City Manager
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
(858) 704-3640
[email protected]
November 18, 2024 Item 11
November 18, 2024 Item 11
1 Denise Galvan
From: McDermott, JP <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 4:01 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Opposed to Special Election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are JP and Candy McDermott, 239 25th St. and wish to express our vehement opposition to a special election for the vacancy of Dwight Worden. We have attended the last two meetings ending in deadlock and feel it is a failure of leadership to not select one of the two remaining candidates.
It was so disappointing to watch our council members act like petulant school children and stick to their personal preferences rather than do what's in the best interest of the City. Listening to both candidates, we both supported Jeff Sturgis for so many reasons but to remain deadlocked with the many important decisions ahead is malpractice.
Please step up and pick a candidate and do not abdicate your responsibility as our elected leaders.
JP & Candy McDermott
November 18, 2024 ITEM 12
1 Denise Galvan
From: Laura DeMarco <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 3:48 PM
To: David Druker; Tracy Martinez; Terry Gaasterland; Dan Quirk Cc: John Spelich; Ashley Jones; City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12: Opposition to wasteful spending on special election CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council Members and Staff,
Instead of a special election, please vote to hold a special meeting to appoint a council member to serve the remaining two-year term of former council member Dwight Worden.
This special meeting would honor the intent of Del Mar voters who just approved a 300% raise in salary for city council members from $3,600 to $11,400/year plus another $400/month health care stipend.
It is for good reason that the City of Del Mar never previously wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars on a special election to fill a vacated council seat. Fiscally responsible council members recognized that it would bust our city’s already strained budget and delay woefully underfunded projects like undergrounding dangerous overhead power lines in high wildfire hazard zones, repairing our dilapidated roads, etc.
The city cannot afford to forgo the opportunity to find a well-qualified 5th council member who brings needed expertise on the major issues we face over the next two years:
1) Crafting a train realignment plan off our crumbling bluffs that requires constructively working with SANDAG and state and federal agencies which would fund the project;
2) Developing affordable housing at the Fairgrounds to fulfill our city’s current Housing Element or else trigger state sanctions that would create even more dense, disruptive, and view blocking development in environmentally sensitive areas; and
3) Completing the primary promise of the Measure Q sales tax passed by voters to fund the largest capital improvement project in the history of Del Mar: undergrounding overhead power lines and unstable transformers prone to sparking wildfires in the tinderbox of Crest Canyon and throughout our community filled with flammable Torrey Pones and Eucalyptus; dense brush; and old wooden houses.
Since you previously deadlocked on well-qualified applicants Jeff Sturgis and Jas Grewal, please open up the application process prior to the special meeting.
If you chose to follow the precedent of selecting former council members, former mayor and retired SDG&E executive Terry Sinnott would hit the ground running. His SDG&E expertise enabled him to spearhead the public/private partnership that undergrounded most of Del Mar’s South Hill, which was our community’s largest successful undergrounding district. His unmatched undergrounding experience and connections with SDG&E would bring invaluable perspective to both the city council and city staff. His diplomatic skills are so well regarded by the representatives of the 17 other cities in the county that he was elected as chair of SANDAG despite representing Del Mar, the smallest city in the county. Terry’s financial experience includes serving as a long-time member and council liason to the city’s finance committee that created the fiscally prudent Finnell Plan.
November 18, 2024 ITEM 12
2 We, the voters, encourage you to select a well-qualified city council appointee as well as spend our tax dollars wisely, not wastefully on a special election.
Thanks for your consideration,
Laura
November 18, 2024 ITEM 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Taylor, Shannon <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 6:35 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Janice Taylor ([email protected])
Subject: Red Dot
Attachments: [EXTERNAL] SPECIAL ELECTION? BEST USE OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS? IT IS IMPORTANT
THAT YOUR VOICE IS HEARD
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Del Mar does not need a wasteful $250,000 special elecƟon. - Concerned ciƟzens Shannon and Janice Taylor of Hoska Drive November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Steve Reich <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 7:25 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Steve Reich
Subject: Special Election
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
HiPlease forward this message to all the Council Members.
It is a total waste of money to hold a Special ElecƟon to choose a new member to replace Dwight Worden as Council Member. The money can be spent on so many areas including fixing deterioraƟng roads within the city. It would be beƩer to keep the money and not fill the seat. It would be best if you could decide on a replacement. The number of people willing to serve is limited. Surely, you can agree on at least one person. -Steve
Steve Reich
202 Stratford Park Circle
Del Mar, CA 92014
Mobile: (858) 204-6321
[email protected]
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: john claus <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 8:31 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Dan Quirk; [email protected]; Tracy Martinez; Dwight Worden-Private; David Druker
Subject: NO SPECIAL ELECTION.....PLEASE!!!
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Esteemed City Council Members.
Let’s believe this is your household money, and you have a tight budget. You have college for the kids, you need a new roof.
Is now the time to buy that Tesla cybertruck ᆿᇀᇁᇂᇃ
Any way to be more creative? Please try to clear your head and see into the shadows (ego), what is really driving your decision.
Kind Regards,
John Claus
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Jonathan Polikoff <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 9:19 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Comment for Monday Council Meeting Monday Nov 18 Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Council meeting agenda comment:
I'm OK with maintaining 4 council members rather than holding a special election therefore saving $250,000 dollars.
Jonathan Polikoff
640 Nob Ave Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Susan Sealock <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 9:32 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Special Election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I do not support a special election.
Susan Perry
Del Mar
Sent from my iPhone
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Camilla Rang <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 10:04 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item # 12, mail ballot special election, City Council Meeting 11.18.2024 Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council,
This item on the agenda is clearly a big dilemma, but it is a dilemma you have put the city in by not being able to agree on one candidate. It is also the biggest proof that we cannot have 4 City Council members. In these unprecedented times with the threats that Del mar is facing from SANDAG, we cannot have a stalemate on a single decision. We have to have a functioning City Council and need to go forward at every step.
Sadly, this will cost the City hundreds of thousands of dollars but that's on you and again the biggest proof that we cannot go forward with a 4 member City Council. How many more situations like these are we going to face and how much will it cost the City, both economically and (non)decision-wise?
Mail out ballot and letting the people decide seems to be the only option at this point unless one of you change your mind and agree to appoint a fifth member that will sit until next election. You have one more chance. Please keep in mind that the person you elect will only be in for two years until the next election and you could think of it as a trial period. If the person turns out to work out well, the people will vote for him/her in 2 years. If it does not work out, that person will not be voted in again by the people.
Do I need to say again that I am hoping you put Jeff Sturgis in? Sincerely,
Camilla Rang
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
City of Del Mar
City Council and Staff
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
November 14, 2024
Red Dot for Item 12
Subject: City Councilmember Vacancy
Dear Mayor, City Council Members, and Staff,
Please save our money. A special election, costing approximately $250,000, translates to about $15-$20 per month in hard costs for residents. But how much more staff time would be consumed, diverting resources from other important projects? It would be a costly and unnecessary distraction.
Our Council has effectively represented Del Mar since Dwight Worden’s resignation. If this vacancy were for a full term or if the election were combined with a ballot on undergrounding, my perspective would differ. However, neither is the case.
I value the diverse opinions and discussions among our Council members and encourage you to continue representing residents thoughtfully. Compromise when it feels appropriate and stand firm when it does not.
Please don’t spend $250,000 on a special election.
Sincerely,
W. Tate Scott
1200 Oribia Rd
Del Mar, CA 92014
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Shannahoff-Khalsa, David <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 11:39 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Tracy Martinez; Dan Quirk; Terry Gaasterland; [email protected] Subject: Red Dot regarding a $250,000 special election
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Manager, et al.,
Given the finances and current problems that we are, and may be facing as a city, and the enormous expense of a special election, in my opinion, this matter can be settled without a special election, even if the solution is just having 4 members on the city council for a short period.
I would rather see the money spent as needed on legal fees for preventing a most unwise site relocation dictated by SANDAG for the train tracks, resisting building a monster on the North Bluff, and even simple street repairs, to name a few.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration,
David Shannahoff-Khalsa
Van Dyke Ave, Del Mar
PS I have been a resident in Del Mar since 1969.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Ruth Evans <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 12:00 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: special election
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi, M===y opinion is that it's better not to waste money on a special election.
Thank you, Ruth Evans, 2115 Balboa Ave, Del Mar, CA 92014.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Linda J <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 12:36 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Linda J
Subject: Red dot letter regarding spending funds on election of city council member Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Honorable City Council Members,
I humbly request that the city of Del Mar not spend funds on a special election for the vacant city council seat. The city of Del Mar has more pressing financial needs and the election would be a waste of tax payers hard earned dollars.
Kind regards,
Linda Judd
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Tom Tucker <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 1:59 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Special Election Del Mar
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
As residents of Del Mar - we are NOT in favor spending upwards of $250 for a special election to fill a position on council.
Thomas H. Tucker
Deborah A Tucker
2061 Seaview Ave, Del Mar, CA 92014
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Bette Hayward <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 2:12 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot-Special Election Monday, Nov. 18
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
11/15/24
Dear Council Members,
Please do not waste money that our city badly needs for 2025 projects.
I cannot believe we are even considering spending 250,000 or more for an election that is not necessary. Our council can do an excellent job as is.
Please be practical with our city’s limited resources.
Sincerely,
Bette Hayward
Fifty-year resident of Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Payson Stevens <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 2:30 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; David Druker; Tracy Martinez; Dan Quirk; Terry Gaasterland Subject: Oppose Special Elections for DM Council
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Red Dot to City Council:
It’s a waste of precious city resources to spend upwards of $250K on a special election.
The current council needs to work together to fill Dwight Warden’s seat and his remaining time.
Please put your differences aside and solve this issue rather than spending City funds.
Sincerely,
Payson R. Stevens
Kamal K. Kapur
Payson R. Stevens
Science Communications
Artwork & Paintings
Indian National Park/Friends of GHNP
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Bill Carpenter <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:00 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12 on Monday 11/18 City Council Meeting
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please try again to appoint a 5th member of the City Council. With a new face on the Council, it just might work. And, if you can't agree on a candidate, do NOT hold a special election, it's too expensive. Flip a coin if you have to - and put the money to better use.
Bill Carpenter
Luneta Dr
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Suzanne Bevash <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:01 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot re Special Election
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
My family resides in Del Mar. I have been a resident for more than 20 years. We appreciate all the hard work that you do.
It is our understanding that a special election will cost Del Mar close to $250,000 to fill the vacant council seat for 12-18 months. Given all the pressing financial obligations the city faces, we do not support this expenditure. While the even number of members creates an ongoing possibility of decision-making stalemates, we have faith that the current members will work together to keep things moving forward. We do not feel that our rights to elect representatives will be compromised by allowing the vacancy to remain until the next election.
Thank you,
Suzanne Bevash
120 8th Street, Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Donald Mosier <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:15 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12 for Nov. 18
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mayor Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, Councilmembers Martinez and Quirk, I oppose holding a Special Election next May to replace the seat held by Dwight Worden. The expense of the election is not worth the addition of a fifth councilmember for 20 months. It is highly likely that expenses in the coming year will cause the city's reserve funds to dip below the council-approved reserve amount, and adding $225K to the budget will force difficult choices on what project next year goes unfunded, e.g. River Path Del Mar trail extension, San Dieguito Drive repair, paving Jimmy Durante, etc.
Please exercise fiscal constraint to preserve flexibility for meeting these and other future needs.
Respectfully,
Don Mosier
--
Dr. Donald Mosier
858-337-5905
Please conserve paper and energy: do not print this email or attachments unless essential.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Dixie Welsh <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:40 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot for 11/18 Council Mtg
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council Members,
I do not think a Special Election is a financially sound idea. The money should be spent fighting SANDAG & Sacramento in their
unreasonable plans for a train tunnel and/or housing requirements.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Mary D. Welsh
155 15th St #26
Del Mar, CA.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Robert Silva
From: Terry Sinnott <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 3:48 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Ashley Jones
Subject: Red Dot November 18, 2024 Agenda #12
Attachments: 2024 Resume.docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Councilmembers:
I am concerned about the vacancy left by Dwight Worden on the Council, how you will fill the vacancy, and the impact on the Council as a whole.
I would recommend the following:
Item 1 .... Try to reach agreement on appointing one of the three applicants... Gesher, Grewel or Sturgis. This would be ideal. It shows the Council can come to agreement on a politically charged issue.
Item 2... If the Council can not agree, consider appointing a retired Councilmember who would serve the remaining part of Dwight's term....and would not stand for election in 2026. You have many experienced people in the community who have served on the Council. Haviland, Mosier, Parks come to mind. I am open to serving on Council if asked.
Del Mar has used this type of appointment in the past. In 2007, Councilmember Jerry Finnell had to resign due to health concerns. Rather than conducting a new election, the Council appointed Richard Earnest to fill Jerry's seat until the end of Jerry's term.
Item 3..... Avoid the temptation of holding a special election .... either a mail only or in-person election. The cost estimates are significant. And during a time of limited budgets, it does not look good that the Council is willing to spend money after a decision impasse.
Item 4 ..... Do not let the vacancy continue until the 2026 regular election. That will only hamstring the Council. There is too much to accomplish.
Hope that is helpful.
Terry
November 18, 2024 Item 12
858 449 846 Terry Sinnott
[email protected]
______________________________________________________________________________ ______
Competencies:
Strategic planning and implementation
Large group facilitation / problem solving
Leadership coaching and assessment
Project management and team building
Organization performance auditing
Community outreach
Board policy development
My Background & Experience:
Community Leadership
Lead Oceanview Pines Underground Project
Successfully completed in 2006
$1.6 million in costs, 15 poles removed
Vision 2020 Strategic Plan for Del Mar
Airport Advisory Committee
November 18, 2024 Item 12
Rerouted Marine aircraft away from Del Mar
Municipal Government – SANDAG
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
Chair, Board of Directors, 2018
Vice-Chair, Board of Directors, 2017
Board Member, 2013-2017
Accomplishments:
+ Provided leadership to calm political tensions at agency + Hired new Executive Director for SANDAG
+ Obtained $80 Million in FTA funding for Mid-Coast highway improvements + Created internal process improvement effort, Plan of Excellence + Completed first year of construction for the new Trolley line to UCSD + Implemented new performance auditing function
November 18, 2024 Item 12
Municipal Government – City of Del Mar
City of Del Mar
Two-Term Mayor, 2013, 2017
City Council 2010-2018
Accomplishments:
+Designed, constructed and completed a new Civic Center for Del Mar +Strengthened the advisory role and reputation of the Finance Committee +Completed sidewalks throughout the City
+Installed traffic calming roundabout on Jimmy Durante Boulevard +Constructed new walking path to the Grand Avenue bridge +Tied sewer system to the San Elijo JPA to the north
+Established the Business Support Advisory Committee to improve downtown +Passed a new 1/2 cent transaction fee to help fund under-grounding of utilities +Created the citizen led Under-ground Project Committee +Began the master planning for Shores Park
+Hired and retained excellent staff, including the City Manager +Hosted the first ever Breeders’ Cup event in Del Mar
+Established a public art program for Del Mar
+Balanced our budgets and set aside funds for paying employee pensions +Approved the implementation of streetscape improvements in the downtown +Implemented badly needed road and infrastructure repairs November 18, 2024 Item 12
Business Consulting 1994-2007
Assisted organizations in executive coaching, change management, organization development, customer relations, and strategic planning. Partial list of clients:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals
California Regional Water Quality Control Agency
County of San Diego
Composite Optics Incorporated
Cubic Transportation Systems
Eastman Kodak
Hewlett Packard
HNC Software
Jaycraft, Inc.
Kyocera America, Inc.
Oracle Corporation
Proxima, Inc.
Ryder Fleet Management
San Diego Padres
Sempra Energy
Senior Flexonics, Ketema Division
Shea Homes, Northern California
Shea Homes, San Diego
Sorrento Electronics
Standard Pacific Homes
University of California, San Diego
November 18, 2024 Item 12
San Diego Gas & Electric 1972-1994
Director, Customer Service 1990-1994
Executive roles in industrial engineering, process improvement, marketing, project management, quality service, strategic planning, and organizational restructuring.
U.S. Navy 1968-1972
Instructor for new commanding officers, Fleet Training Center, San Diego OOD Underway, U.S.S. Bon Homme Richard (CVA-31), Vietnam 1969-1970 Education
BA, Pomona College
MBA, San Diego State University
Post Graduate Intern, University Associates
Accelerating Change Accreditation, IMA
November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 --
Terry Sinnott
858 449 0846
www.terrysinnott.com
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: suresh mahajan <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 4:30 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Re special election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I consider this as a huge waste of money
250k can be used upgrade our city help seniors and get better education for our kids I strongly oppose the initiative to hold a special election Suresh Mahajan
Resident
292 dolphin cove ct
Delmar
California
92014
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Beth Mattfolk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 4:50 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: No special election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Let’s save the $$and not do a special election. Beth and Jeff Mattfolk 717 Nob Ave
Del Mar, CA 92014
From my phone
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Susan Halenza <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 5:23 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: No special election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Sent from my iPad
I vote to NOT hold a special election to fill out council position.
Susan Halenza
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Gillian Gillies <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 5:45 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: No on the special election.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
As a resident of Del Mar, I want to express that I am against the special election for filling the vacant seat. We have many more urgent issues that require our attention.
Best.
Gillian Gillies
140 7th st
858-945-4856
Dre 01980002
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Williamson <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 7:41 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot, November 18 Item 12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members:
Gill and I encourage you to vote for no special election to add another Council member at this time. This can wait until 2026.
Thank you.
---Ann Williamson
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Sherryl Parks <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 3:36 AM
To: Sarah Krietor; City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot - Do not put Dwight's council seat replacement - no vote CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please submit for Monday's council meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Druker
Tracy Martinez
Terri Gaasterland
Dan Quirk
We do not need a costly election to replace Dwight Worden City Council Members,
I have lived here in Del Mar for over forty years and I have seen council members replaced from time to time. My exhusband, Elliot Parks was appointed to his council position through the interview process; not a costly election..
I have not heard cogent reasons from the council as to why a special election? What would you gain? It would be a waste of time, money and community attention.
You can leave the seat open and have a 4-person council. John Spelich pointed out the 2024 votes showing 93.4% of votes were unanimous or a 4-1 vote.
However, by not selecting someone for that seat you lose having that person's voice out in the community providing information and feedback to you and help you serve the community.
It is my opinion that you not put this to a vote.
Sherryl Parks
709 Kalamath Drive
Del Mar. CA. 92014
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Michael Maronde <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 7:49 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot/Special Election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear, Mayor Dave Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, and Council Members Tracy Martinez and Dan Quirk, I strongly oppose the Special Election that is being discussed.
Michael Maronde
704 Nob Ave
Del Mar, CA 92014
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 10:23 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot Letter - DMCC Agenda Item #12 - 18 Nov 2024 - City Council Member Vacancy CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Red Dot Letter – DMCC Agenda Item #12 – 18 Nov 2024 – City Council Member Vacancy To the current voting members of the Del Mar City Council:
Please try to reach consensus this evening on a candidate to fill the vacated seat of Dwight Worden. If you are unable to do so, please take no action and leave the seat vacant until the election in November 2026.
I am opposed to calling a special election to elect a fifth member of the City Council. The $150K - $225K in funds could be better used to repair our roads, fight the proposed train tunnel and many other worthy projects that will benefit Del Mar.
I have confidence that our four democratically elected City Council members will be able to reach a majority consensus on almost all matters that come before them during the next two years.
Sincerely,
Amy Cheshire
San Dieguito Drive
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Caitlin Rae <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 10:38 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot for Agenda Item 12 (11/18/24)
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
Normally in the spirit of democracy I would completely support a special election when there has been a vacancy on City Council. This time, I cannot support this option for one reason.
We residents of Del Mar just elected and re-elected three members of City Council who ran unopposed!!! If they had opposition, if the voters actually had a choice for those three seats, the decision to fill the vacant seat would be different.
Rather, all of the candidates for the vacant seat are qualified volunteers willing to do the difficult job you all share.
For that reason and to save a costly special election at a time when the city needs all of the money it can retain, please make the right choice by choosing any of the volunteer candidates to fill the vacant seat.
Sincerely,
Caitlin Laipenieks
1340 Oribia Road
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Pam Linton <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 2:04 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: no on special election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Our opinion is not to spend any money on a new election.
Pam and Scott Linton
1310 Stratford Court
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: John Spelich <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 2:32 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Cc: Kseniia Izgarskaia; Sarah Krietor
Subject: Red Dot Item 12 Nov 18 , 2024
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor Druker, Deputy Mayor Gaasterland, Council members Martinez, and Quirk.
I will be taking a seat on this Council in a few weeks. I have gotten to know all of you a bit in my time living here. I expect to be able to work for all of you doing what is best for the city in a professional manner, just like you’ve done largely throughout the past year.
Tonight, you are to decide whether to call a special election at a cost of up to $250,000 to fill a seat for 18 months or less, consider another attempt at appointment, or do nothing.
And like in our national politics, it’s become sport to say what you think you have to in order to get your way. I won’t do that. I am just offering these facts below.
As a Council you have functioned amazingly well reaching unanimous consensus or with only one dissent more than 93 percent of the time in the past year. I feel that this is in part a tribute to our excellent staff as well as our advisory groups that hash out the details before they come forward for consideration. I cannot see how that would change.
Forces calling for an expensive special election say this about “democracy.” It’s really not. We have four members on the Council now who represent the entire city. No one here is without representation. By the way, voters like the job you’re doing. They overwhelmingly gave you a well-deserved raise.
Others are saying “this is illegal.” It’s not. Other cities have done it. We have a strong rationale for not doing it. Our council functions. Everyone is represented already. We really need the money elsewhere. Those are viable defenses to any legal challenge.
Yes, it’s true someone could sue the city to attempt to force you to hold the special election. It’s also been said there are people poised to challenge. Who are they, and why? I would say to the person who would sue the city: What is the hidden agenda (because the reasons stated so far don’t make any sense)? This isn’t about the functioning of the Council or the betterment of the city. So why should we spend the money to do this in the face of actual evidence it’s not necessary and when we have pressing budget needs? November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 We had four candidates step forward for appointment and yet the Council deadlocked on five separate votes (appointments are the only real Council point of contention this past year).
From my perspective, Jas Grewal, who is treasurer of my campaign, is by far the most qualified of all the candidates for this position as her experience checks all the boxes of what Del Mar will need in the coming few years. Jas stepped forward as a consensus candidate willing to serve out Dwight Worden’s term. She has extensive professional banking and finance experience (including a former stint on Finance Committee), affordable housing experience (Chair of the Citizen Housing Task Force), and a Planning Commissioner, on top of copious amounts of regional philanthropic volunteerism. I can’t for the life of me understand why you would reject someone that qualified.
Keep in mind, there will be an election in less than two years. Those who are interested in serving on Council can run at that time. Hopefully we will have an actual choice among candidates who will stand before the voters and make the case for why they should be elected to serve.
Personally, I am in favor of saving the $250,000 when we know there are big-ticket unbudgeted items in front of us, and still other issues that could crop up. That is money we will desperately wish we had next year, as I explained in my note to residents on Friday.
Please vote “no” on a special election and let’s get back to work for the residents and the betterment of the city.
Thank you.
John Spelich
City Council member-elect
David Way, Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Jay Wadekar <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 3:41 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am not in favor of special elections.
Please use that money to pave Stratford court.
Jay
Sent from my iPhone
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Rose Ann Sharp <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 3:42 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Against: Holding a Special Election to Fill a City Council Vacancy.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
Please do not waste the city’s financial resources for a special election to fill one vacancy when the remaining period of the term after that special election is held is less than half of the term. Further consideration is to look at historical data. It shows near unanimous votes on all important issues before the City Council.
Please acknowledge that the two top candidates in the 2024 election enjoy the full confidence of the voters to proceed as they see best fit. They support no special election. The third candidate in the 2024 election supports a special election and appears to have less than half of the voters’ confidence. Numbers matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Rose Ann Sharp
Rose Ann Sharp
834 Crest Rd
Del Mar, CA 92014
(239) 777-9411
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Sudhir Malik <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 4:37 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Reference #12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to you with reference to the special elections. As a resident of Delmar for more than a decade, and a registered voter, I wish to express my protest in favor of a special election for the vacant seat. OUR funds/monies should be allocated to many other, more useful and resident relevant issues.
I sincerely wish you to record, respect and respond in the affirmative to my concern.
Thank you
Sudhir Malik
Sent from Gmail Mobile
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Glenn Warren <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 5:00 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot November 18, 2024 Agenda #12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Council Members:
I echo those Del Mar residents who believe the cost of a special election is not warranted. Before a decision is made to forgo an election and allow the seat to remain open until the next general election, however, the following issues should be addressed and explained:
1. The applicability of Govt. Code Section 36512, which seems to indicate that in the event of a vacant council seat, the options are to appoint a replacement or hold an election;
2. The "risks" to the City referred to in the Staff Report of not filling the seat.
Yours truly,
Glenn Warren
27th Street
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Neeta Wadekar <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 5:08 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I am opposed to special election
Sent from my iPhone
Neeta Wadekar
Cell: 617-901-7487
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ken Olson <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 7:22 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot for Council meeting 11/18/24 Item 12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council members --
My last choice is a special election.
Next to last choice is to leave the seat open. Every council member brings value.
First choice is that the four councilmembers (whom we elected to represent us so we don’t have to do this stuff ourselves) should choose someone from the available pool.
If the council members don’t want to publicly change their votes, it’s probably legal to pull a name (from a subset of candidates) from a hat, then unanimously elect that person. Easy. [email protected]
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2024 8:04 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red Dot - November 18, 2024 Agenda #12 - city council election CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members:
I am not in favor of an expensive special election to choose a replacement for Dwight Worden. There are better ways to utilize these city funds.
I support the suggestion offered by Terry Sinnott in his red dot…to consider appointing a retired and willing Councilmember who would serve the remaining part of Dwight's term.
Respectfully,
Bertha Leone
728 Crest Rd
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Udo Wahn <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 6:47 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot re: Special Election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Simply stated, I do not think a Special Election is warranted.
Udo Wahn, M.D.
Stratford Court
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ann Feeney <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 6:58 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Vote NO for a special election
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Mayor, Deputy Mayor and Councilmembers,
I strongly urge you to not hold a special election to fill the vacancy created when Dwight Worden resigned. The cost, approximately $200,000 for a mail-in balloting, could be so much better spent on the many other important and expensive projects that the city is working on, as well as things as routine as needed street repairs. Something will need to go if this money is squandered on an unnecessary election.
There is nothing in the election code that mandates that the city fill the position, unlike some misinformation which has been circulating. If a special election is held, at great cost, the person would only serve for less than 1.5 years. Since most Council votes have unanimous or 4:1, it makes filling the vacancy less important. What a waste of precious City money!
Please vote NO for a special election.
Sincerely,
Ann Feeney
Rimini Rd.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Hilda Alsabrook <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 9:42 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Red dot
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
My feeling is that there is not any reason to spend money on a special election for a short term since there was no candidate for an unopposed seat! That likely would happen again. The time and funds would be better used trying to foster trust and communication within the city to try to unearth good candidates who could foster community.
Sent from my iPad
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Peter Cramton <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 6:15 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Fwd: Item 12, City Councilmember Vacancy, Red Dot Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Sarah,
Please discard my earlier red dot and use the **revised** one.
Many thanks,
Peter
Peter Cramton
[email protected] cramton.umd.edu +1 530 408 6698
University of Maryland and Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods ---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Peter Cramton <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 6:03 PM
Subject: Item 12, City Councilmember Vacancy, Red Dot
To: City Clerk Mail Box <[email protected]>, Dave Druker <[email protected]>, Terry Gaasterland <[email protected]>, Tracy Martinez <[email protected]>, Dan Quirk <[email protected]> To: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: Peter Cramton, 901 Highland Ave, Del Mar CA 92014 Re: Item 12, City Councilmember Vacancy, Red Dot **Revised** To avoid the cost and delay of a formal vote to resolve the current 2-2 tie, I propose a simple alternative with no delay and no additional cost. It is the second item on page 3 of the staff report listing Alternative Options:
Appointment
The Council also has the option to fill the vacancy by appointment on or before November 23, 2024. There are no established City procedures for filling a Councilmember vacancy; however, the Council previously directed staff to follow a similar procedure as the City Council undertakes when making appointments to the Planning Commission and Design Review Board. To be appointed to the Council, an applicant requires an affirmative vote from a majority of those Councilmembers present and voting. Most recently, on October 21, 2024, the Council considered applications received from three candidates: Nicole Gesher, Jas Grewal, and Jeff Sturgis, but were unable to reach majority agreement on an appointment.
I understand that Jas Grewal and Jeff Sturgis received two votes each in the prior vote and that no Councilmember has expressed a willingness to change their vote. What is needed is a tie-breaking rule. In my work for governments November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 designing rules that assign resources among participants, I always include a tie-breaking rule whenever there is a mathematical possibility of a tie, yet a decision is required. That is what is needed here.
I propose that the candidates and/or the Council agree to a simple tie-breaking rule. An informal poll of the registered voters be conducted via Google Forms. An email is sent to the registered voters for whom the city has email addresses, which I understand to be 2300 out of 3249 registered voters, asking them to select Jas Grewal, Jeff Sturgis, or both (indicating approval for both). I recommend that the City Clerk conduct the poll as a neutral party. The poll will have a deadline, such as 48 hours after the emails are sent. The City Clerk can inform the candidates and the council members of the outcome of the informal poll. Then, each candidate can decide whether to withdraw from consideration. The Councilmembers can then vote knowing the outcome of the poll and the list of candidates. If a majority vote results, then the selected candidate is appointed by the Council consistent with the option above.
The informal poll is consistent with Council procedures. The purpose of the poll is to provide information to the candidates and the Councilmembers that may impact either 1) the decision of a candidate to withdraw from consideration or 2) the vote of Councilmembers. No one is required to take a particular action based on the poll. The poll provides information. The poll is not perfect. It is limited to a significant majority of registered voters. Still, it may provide helpful information to resolve the current tie.
Tie-breaking rules are commonly used in assignment processes—from multi-billion dollar government auctions to the ball fields of our children. That is all that is needed. Why waste potentially $250,000 of our city funds to accomplish the same thing as a simple tie-breaking rule?
Thank you for your service and your kind consideration.
Appendix
To make my suggestion concrete, I have created a Google Form and tested that it works (it verifies my email address and only lets me vote once). It is not perfect, but since its purpose is to break a tie with information from voters, it may be good enough, and it saves both time and money.
I have made the City Clerk editor in case that is helpful. Below you can see the response I received from Google Forms confirming my vote.
To help
protect your
privacy,
Micro so ft
Office
prevented
auto matic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.
Google Forms
Thanks for filling out Del Mar Poll for Vacant City Council Seat Here's what was received.
Del Mar Poll for Vacant City Council Seat
This is an informal poll for registered voters in the City of Del Mar. If you are not a registered voter in Del Mar please exit the form now. To verify your email and limit you to one response, you will need to log in to Google to participate.
The poll ends at 3:30 pm on Monday, November 18, 2025, one hour before the Council meeting.
The most recent vote to fill the vacant Del Mar City Council seat resulted in Jas Grewal and Jeff Sturgis each receiving two votes. The Council requires a majority to select a candidate. An official election could be held to November 18, 2024 Item 12
3 resolve the tie but this would involve substantial delay and a cost to residents of up to $250,000. An alternative is for the tie to be resolved with this poll of residents. The candidate who receives the least votes in this poll can remove their name from consideration, making it easy for the City Council to select the candidate who receives the most votes from those participating in this poll.
Your email ([email protected]) was recorded when you submitted this form.
Please select your preferred candidate for City Council (vote for one or both). * ✓ Jas Grewal
✓ Jeff Sturgis
How would you prefer the current 2-2 tie to be resolved? * Whoever receives the fewest votes in this poll should remove their name from consideration for the vacant seat The City Council should request a formal vote that would involve substantial delay and cost residents up to $250,000.
Your full name: *
Peter Cramton
Your Del Mar street address (e.g. 123 Highland Ave): *
901 Highland Ave
Certification *
✓ I certify that I am a registered voter in the City of Del Mar Create your own Google Form
Report Abuse
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: suren dutia <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 7:18 AM
To: Sarah Krietor; City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: RED DOT City Council meeting Item #12 - No Special Election CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Please consider this as my RED DOT submission for the city council meeting today, agenda item #12. My position is that there should not be special election and city council must not spend any money on this unnecessary activity that is being advocated by Mr. Quirk and Ms. Gaasterland. For the record and to explain my rationale, I wish to transmit the Letter to the Editor (see below) that I coauthored with Marty Cooper and was published by the Del Mar Times on November 14, 2024.
Thank you,
Suren
Suren G. Dutia
C-619/261-4024
Council: Keep doing good work; No special election
On Nov. 5, 2020, we congratulated in a letter to this newspaper the newly elected Del Mar City Council and urged them to approach their stewardship with humility and civility. They largely achieved that goal with some notable exceptions and reached laudable consensus votes during their four years. In fact, more than 90% of votes in 2024 were mostly unanimous or a few by 4-1. This was because of the good judgement of council members as well as competent preparatory staff work followed by reviews and guidance of the altruistic residents who serve on committees and boards. For this effective leadership the city council deserves an “A” grade.
We now offer suggestions on how they may continue good work and avoid needless detours.
The council’s performance was marred by unnecessary discord and distraction. Once again we urge all council members to approach their service with respect toward each other even in the face of inevitable differences. That civility is the essence of the democratic process. Council members propose, discuss, negotiate, and vote on the complex issues that face our city, and move on. There is no reason, no necessity, for personal invective.
The council now has an option to leave the vacant council seat open until the regular election cycle in November 2026 or, alternatively, conduct a special election at a cost of about $250,000. We strongly recommend that a special election not be held. The expenditure of $250,000 and the associated distraction to solve what appears to be a non-problem seems unconscionable. Let’s not squander taxpayers’ dollars when we have many important priorities, including repairing streets.
In this election cycle, two incumbents and a newcomer were unopposed. We congratulate them and are grateful for their willingness to serve the Del Mar community. Working together, including one council member whose term will expire in two years, the council will have to address numerous challenges emanating from internal and external forces like relocating train tracks, meeting state mandate on affordable housing, undergrounding of utilities, and many others while maintaining the charm and character of Del Mar. We strongly urge them to show respect to fellow members, the city staff and outside agencies.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 We will be rooting for your success in addressing challenges and fulfilling the mandates of the Community Plan. We look forward to reviewing your accomplishments in two years.
We would be remiss if we did not recognize Dwight Worden and David Druker, both exceptional role models and stalwarts, who are moving on after many years of dedicated service. They deserve our gratitude for their outstanding contributions to the city of Del Mar and making it such a wonderful place.
Marty Cooper and Suren Dutia
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Brad Walters <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 7:36 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12 red dot, 11/18 meeting
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Council,
My understanding is that the Del Mar River Path extension remains in search of funding.
Having been nearly clipped by a speeding driver just this weekend while walking along San Dieguito, it would be malpractice to spend $150k-$250k on a special election when that amount would go a long way toward closing that funding gap — to say nothing of other projects in search of funding.
It appears internal power struggles have led to a pair of 2-2 stalemates, although the council alliances in this case have been a bit surprising and perhaps even foretelling — especially considering which local interest groups have been advocating for (or organizing against) which candidates.
But we’ll never know the whole story, due to the council’s apparent policy on not discussing their choices. All we can do is read between the lines. I thank Mayor Druker in particular for asking illuminating questions last meeting to try to tease out some of those differences.
It all makes me wonder whether a little bit more 2-2 gridlock might not actually be the worst thing in the world for the next couple of years. If someone wants to sue to force the issue, let them be a pariah for costing the city even more money.
Thank you,
Brad Walters
Stratford Ct.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Tate Scott <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 8:24 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 11
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
After carefully reviewing the requirements of California Government Code § 36512 and considering the implications for addressing the current vacancy, I would like to share my recommendation. I believe the most prudent approach is to timely call a special election within the 60-day statutory period and schedule it for the next regularly established election date that is at least 114 days away, ideally coinciding with the general election.
Why This Approach is the Right Choice
1. Legal Compliance:
1. Calling a special election within the statutory 60 days satisfies § 36512(b).
Scheduling the election on the next general election date ensures compliance with the 114-day minimum while aligning with a pre-established election timeline.
2. Cost Savings:
1. A standalone special election is costly. Aligning this election with the general election minimizes expenses by leveraging existing resources. Given the city’s fiscal responsibilities, including substantial costs for the undergrounding project, this option demonstrates responsible financial stewardship.
3. Democratic Integrity:
1. Allowing voters to choose their representative at the next general election upholds democratic principles while ensuring that any appointee serves only temporarily, preserving electoral accountability.
4. Representation and Participation:
1. Although this option may delay filling the vacancy, it ensures higher voter turnout and broader representation when the election occurs during a general election.
Addressing Legal and Practical Considerations
The city retains full flexibility to address any legal challenges, including:
1. Appointment Option:
1. Should circumstances or council preferences change, the city may still exercise its option to appoint a qualified volunteer to serve until the next election.
2. Court-Ordered Election:
November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 1. If litigation results in a court ruling mandating a special election earlier than the next general election date, the city can call and hold the election within the court’s required timeframe.
Rae’s thoughtful comments in her red dot communication reinforce the validity of this approach. She highlights that recent elections were uncontested, and residents had no choice in electing representatives. Additionally, the availability of qualified volunteers willing to serve mitigates concerns about leaving the seat vacant temporarily. As Rae points out, these circumstances justify prioritizing cost savings and efficiency over holding an immediate special election.
A Broader Perspective
While filling this vacancy is important, it is relatively insignificant when compared to the financial and strategic complexities of the undergrounding project. By prioritizing costefficient decisions like aligning the special election with the general election, the city demonstrates fiscal responsibility without compromising democratic representation.
Conclusion
Calling a special election within the statutory 60-day period and scheduling it for the next regularly established election date achieves a balanced solution, minimizing costs while maintaining adherence to the law and democratic values. Importantly, the city retains its flexibility to pivot if necessary, whether by appointment or by holding an earlier special election if legally required. Rae’s comments further validate this approach as reflective of both fiscal prudence and community sentiment.
Tate Scott
1200 Oribia Rd.
Del Mar, CA 92014
/wts
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Kerridge, Carol <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 8:33 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: RED Dot Item 12
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council Members,
It's with concern that I am writing in hopes that after deeply considering all options as to whether or not to quickly appoint a resident to fill the vacancy on our current City Council, I think we need to consider taking a pause.
I wonder why this issue has become such a power struggle. Who and what does this quick decision serve? Certainly not the residents of our town.
Given the fact that making a choice for this position became such a huge unfair and malicious character assault of one of the candidates (and family members) just a couple of months ago, and our City Councilmembers were unable to come to a conclusion, I firmly believe we need to have a period of cooling off, working together with the 4 strong members of our City Council on the huge problems we are facing, and have a vote of all residents on this matter. I think it can wait till our regular election cycle in 2 years, to help us afford the many improvements we need for our city.
Grateful for the privilege of participating in a democracy, Carol Kerridge
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: suresh mahajan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 8:48 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Re special election
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I live in Delmar
I consider the special election a total waste of money and am opposed to it The money can be better spent on infrastructure, helping seniors or providing funds to schools Suresh Mahajan
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: arnold wiesel <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 9:02 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: RED DOT LETTER......
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Re: Today 11/18/24 City Council Meeting
To all concerned,
We have great confidence in our City Council! Accordingly, we believe that operating our City Council (government) with one less seat being filled at this time (vacancy) until next general election should not be a problem.
Our only concern is due to conflicting information spread among our city which asserts that if our City does not fill this vacancy right away, then our City under California law will be obligated to arrange a special election in order to fill this open seat at a cost of approximately up to $250,000.
Our number one choice:
#1. If permissible under state law, Del Mar is legally able to leave this one vacant seat vacant until the next general election, then we are strongly in favor of leaving this one vacant seat vacant until our next general election.
Alternatively, if under law this vacant seat cannot be left vacant, then we strongly are in favor of making an appointment among the Council that does not result in a deadlock vote! Again, if law November 18, 2024 Item 12
2 dictates, our City Council must attain agreement and resolution to fill this vacancy as opposed to fight and pay up to $250,000 of citizens tax dollars.
Bottom line, paying up to $250,000 for a special election is unacceptable.
Respectfully,
Arnold and Annette Wiesel
2139 Heather Ln.
Del Mar
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Martin Cooper <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 9:39 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box; Ashley Jones
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Red Dot
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
This constitutes my RED DOT submission on City Council meeting agenda, item #12 against spending money or holding a special election. The city council should function with four members until the regular election cycle commences in 2026. In response to advocacy of Terry Gaasterland, I have written the following email and recommended she show her customary leadership and good judgment and consider changing her vote.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Martin Cooper <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 01:58:31 PM PST
Subject: RE: Empty Council Seat Must Be Filled One Way Or Another - the State Code Tells Us So Terry,
Thanks for taking time to clarify Del Mar’s options. The only logical solution is for the council to agree on appointment of the new member. If we spend ANY money on an election, I question the judgement of the council on other issues as well. Dedicated public servants like you and the other council members must realize that one of you can save the city a distracting election by conceding a decision that will have little impact on the city’s future. I respect your advocacy for Jeff, but, as an example, you might demonstrate your leadership and good judgement by changing your vote.
Marty Cooper
November 18, 2024 Item 12
Red Dot, November 16, 2024
To:
Mayor Druker, City Council members Gaasterland, Martinez, Quirk, City Manager Ashley Jones:
You in office have the job of maintaining the charm, character and reputation of Del Mar, showing respect to each other, the city staff as well neighboring cities and outside agencies and managing the city’s budget with the many varied ongoing and upcoming expenses.
Therefore it is up to you and incoming John Spelich to not squander the whopping sum of $150,000, $250,000-$350,000 on a specially called election to replace retired member Worden.
Julie Maxey-Allison
10 Street
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Donald Mosier <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2024 6:01 PM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item 12, Nov. 18th Agenda
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mayor, Deputy Mayor, Councilmembers,
I believe an email distributed by Deputy Mayor Gaasterland this Friday evening misrepresents the options available to the city by claiming that "state law requires the city to hold an election" to fill the seat vacated by Dwight Worden.
Here is the pertinent section of the state election code:
(d) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (b) and Section 34902, an appointment shall not be made to fill a vacancy on a city council if the appointment would result in a majority of the members serving on the council having been appointed. The vacancy shall be filled in the manner provided by this subdivision.
(2) The city council may call an election to fill the vacancy, to be held on the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days after the call. (3) If the city council does not call an election pursuant to paragraph (2), the vacancy shall be filled at the next regularly established election date. --
Dr. Donald Mosier
858-337-5905
Please conserve paper and energy: do not print this email or attachments unless essential.
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Ted Bakker <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 10:50 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Item #12 opposition to special elction
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello Del Mar City Council,
We strongly oppose the use of a special election in filling the council position vacated by the resignation of Dwight Worden. The cost of a special election is far to costly for such a small community as Del Mar. We have other needs in the city that the citizens will benefit far more from than a special election.
Ted & Gale Bakker
November 18, 2024 Item 12
1 Melinda Gould
From: Laura Schaefer <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2024 11:40 AM
To: City Clerk Mail Box
Subject: Agenda Item #12
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Clerk:
Kindly submit the following red-dot communication to the City Council for Item 12 of the November 18, 2024 meeting agenda.
Dear Honorable Mayor and Distinguished Members of the City Council:
I write in opposition to spending several hundred thousand dollars on a special election for the council member seat left vacant by Dwight Worden. Several highly qualified candidates have stepped up to fill this vacancy. I urge you to reach a consensus and avoid spending funds on a special election.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura Schaefer
6th St
Del Mar CA
November 18, 2024 Item 12