Delano City Council
April 6, 2026

AGENDA

DELANO CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING April 6, 2026
DELANO CITY HALL, 1015- llth Avenue 5:15 P.M.

TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS AT THE TIME OF THE MEETING AS FOLLOWS:

Please click the link below to join the webinar:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/8678 l 635656?pwd=QFXcSb3aThNKXa WT2OEcB4rL3aGRRb. l Webinar ID: 867 8163 5656
Passcode: 396640

CALL TO ORDER

INVOCATION

FLAG SALUTE

ROLL CALL

PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
" Proclamation for Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention Month " Proclamation for Relay for Life
e Presentation of Life Saving Award - Julio Galvan
PUBLIC COMMENT: The public may address the Council on items which do not appear on the agenda. The Council cannot respond nor take action on items that do not appear on the agenda but may refer the item to staff for further study or for placement on a future agenda. Comments are limited to 3 minutes for each person and 15 minutes on each subject. Please state your name and address for the record.

CONSENT AGENDA: The Consent Agenda consists of items that in staff's opinion are routine and noncontroversial. These items are approved in one motion unless a Councilmember or member of the public removes a particular item.

I) Authorization to waive the reading of any ordinance in its entirety and consenting to the reading of such ordinances by title only
2) Warrant Register in the amount of $2,433,884.33
3) Minutes of regular Council meeting of March 16, 2026 4) Minutes of special Council meeting of March 23, 2026 5) Acceptance of the 2024 Transit Maintenance Facility Roofing Project and authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion
6) Adopt resolution extending the Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I Hiring Bonus Program

Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description 03/05/2026 1 4IMPRINT 49677 $ 1,041.20 30989805 4IMPRINT INV 30989805 CUPS AND COASTERS FOR MARKETING AT EVENTS 53530 - ADVERTISING 4IMPRINT Total $ 1,041.20
03/05/2026 739 ACC BUSINESS 49678 $ 895.58 0749442117 ACC BUSINESS-INTERNET SRV FOR PD INV 0749442117 SERV 01/11/26-02/10/26 52590 - INTERNET SRVCS CIS ACC BUSINESS Total $ 895.58
03/05/2026 740 ACME ROTARY BROOM SERVICE 49679 $ 896.62 174 REAR BROOMS/STREET SWEEPING 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 740 ACME ROTARY BROOM SERVICE 49679 $ 821.62 175 REAR BROOM FOR SWEEPER 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 740 ACME ROTARY BROOM SERVICE 49679 $ 806.77 177 GUTTER BROOMS FOR SWEEPER 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 740 ACME ROTARY BROOM SERVICE 49679 $ 775.07 176 GUTTER BROOMS FOR SWEEPERS 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY ACME ROTARY BROOM SERVICE Total $ 3,300.08
03/05/2026 748 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE, IN 49680 $ 54.62 0233561 SHRED SERVICES/CITY HALL/2/18/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 748 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE, IN 49680 $ 54.62 0233561 SHRED SERVICES/CITY HALL/2/18/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 748 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE, IN 49680 $ 54.63 0233561 SHRED SERVICES/CITY HALL/2/18/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 748 ADVANCED DATA STORAGE, IN 49680 $ 54.63 0233561 SHRED SERVICES/CITY HALL/2/18/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT ADVANCED DATA STORAGE, IN Total $ 218.50
03/05/2026 753 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICI 49681 $ 140.00 EM069874 DOT Drug Screen and Breath Test - Fabian Cervantes 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 753 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICI 49681 $ 125.00 EM069874 DOT Physical - L Herrera 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICI Total $ 265.00
03/05/2026 24 AUTOZONE COMMERCIAL 49682 $ 149.11 02829968865 UNIT 3537 FRONT GRILL 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 24 AUTOZONE COMMERCIAL 49682 $ 14.06 02829979126 UNIT D114 AIR FILTER 55100 - VEHICLE M & O AUTOZONE COMMERCIAL Total $ 163.17
03/05/2026 1638 AWP SAFETY 49683 $ 209.27 12021263 MARKING PAINT 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY AWP SAFETY Total $ 209.27
03/05/2026 30 BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN 49684 $ 374.64 01/31/26 notice inviting sealed proposals DART revenue transit advertising 53530 - ADVERTISING BAKERSFIELD CALIFORNIAN Total $ 374.64
03/05/2026 100267 BAKERSFIELD CUSTOM SIGNS 49685 $ 2,600.00 2224 DESIGN,PRINT,LAMINATE AND INTALL WRAP DESIGN FOR FORD EXPLORER RECRUITME55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL BAKERSFIELD CUSTOM SIGNS Total $ 2,600.00
03/05/2026 100011 BESTCO UA 49686 $ 1,552.50 03012026 RETIREE HEALTH PREMIUMS- MARCH 23191 - MEDICAL INSURANCE L BESTCO UA Total $ 1,552.50
03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 1,787.16 BA_9475_2026 GM HUD CPF - WELL 42 Equipping and Treatment 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 3,877.10 BA_9530_2026 DEL Grant Research and Support 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 3,714.26 BA_9530_2026 DEL Grant Research and Support 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 1,755.00 BA_9530_2026 DEL Grant Research and Support 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 459.26 BA_9530_2026 DEL Grant Research and Support 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49687 $ 3,255.00 BA_9501_2026 DOT BUILD FLYOVER BRIDE 2025/26 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Total $ 14,847.78

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
Agenda Item: 2
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 878 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 49688 $ 176,497.56 260430016549 Health Insurance Premiums- March 23191 - MEDICAL INSURANCE L 03/05/2026 878 BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA 49688 $ 2,670.70 260430012950 Health Insurance Premiums Retirees- March 23191 - MEDICAL INSURANCE L BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA Total $ 179,168.26
03/05/2026 46 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC 49689 $ 3,460.27 BPI583567 Sodium Hypochlorite, 1200 Gallons used for water treatment 57512 - CHLORINE FOR WL WAT 03/05/2026 46 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC 49689 $ 3,878.61 BPI583568 Sodium Hypochlorite, 1350 Gallons used for water treatment 57512 - CHLORINE FOR WL WAT 03/05/2026 46 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC 49689 $ 979.66 BPI584206 Ferric Chloride, 100 gallons used for water treatment 57512 - CHLORINE FOR WL WAT BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC Total $ 8,318.54
03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 168.00 AJ02853 (8) Weekly Arsenic samples taken on Wells 22, 24, 26 & 39 on 2/1/26 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 33.25 BJ00557 (1) Bacti sample taken for new waterline on Dover St on 2/2/26 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 365.16 AJ02852 (17) Bacti samples taken on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 132.70 AJ02846 (2) HPC samples and (3) Bacti samples taken at the GAC plant on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 21.48 AJ02847 (1) Bacti sample taken at Well 35 on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 29.67 AJ02851 (1) Nitrate sample taken for Well 35 on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 128.88 AJ02849 (6) Bacti samples taken on Water Wells 22, 31, 39, 40 on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 150.36 AJ02848 (7) Bacti samples taken on water wells 24, 25, 26, 30 & 33 on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 168.00 AJ03303 (8) Weekly Bacti samples taken on 2/8/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 365.16 AJ03304 (17) Bacti samples taken on 2/10/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 21.48 AJ03302 (1) Bacti sample taken at Well 34 on 2/10/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 49 BSK & ASSOCIATES INC 49690 $ 168.00 AJ03868 (8) Weekly Arsenic samples taken on Wells 22, 24, 26 & 39 on 2/15/26 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL BSK & ASSOCIATES INC Total $ 1,752.14
03/05/2026 51 BSN SPORTS LLC 49691 $ 462.68 933211212 Youth Basketball Supplies 59017 - YOUTH PROGRAMS REC 03/05/2026 51 BSN SPORTS LLC 49691 $ 522.80 933275526 Youth Basketball Supplies 59017 - YOUTH PROGRAMS REC BSN SPORTS LLC Total $ 985.48
03/05/2026 82 C & H FENCE 49692 $ 1,464.62 15212 SECURITY FENCE FOR EMERGENCY TRANSFORMER REPAIR AT WWTP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY C & H FENCE Total $ 1,464.62
03/05/2026 928 CARDINAL CODE SOLUTIONS, 49693 $ 29,658.47 0226B Building Plan Checking and Inspections Services, Agreement No. 2016-99, February 9-22 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL CARDINAL CODE SOLUTIONS, Total $ 29,658.47
03/05/2026 929 CARROLL'S TIRE WAREHOUSE 49694 $ 346.64 309846 UNIT 3308 2 TIRES 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 929 CARROLL'S TIRE WAREHOUSE 49694 $ 714.94 309847 UNIT 72034 4 NEW TIRES 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 929 CARROLL'S TIRE WAREHOUSE 49694 $ 476.06 309861 UNIT 727 2 TIRES 55100 - VEHICLE M & O CARROLL'S TIRE WAREHOUSE Total $ 1,537.64
03/05/2026 100273 CATO 49695 $ 325.00 3002676 Critical Incident Leadership for Field Supervisors - Rommel Bautista/April 13-14, 2026 54040 - TRAINING-POST POLICE CATO Total $ 325.00
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 150.00 26-00744 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 26-00744 UNIT D115 BROKE DOWN HAD TO GET VEH TOWED 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 150.00 26-00745 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 26-00745 UNIT D115 BROKE DOWN 1/28/26 HAD TO BE TOWE 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 150.00 26-00746 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 26-00746 UNIT D115 BROKE DOWN 1/29/26 HAD TO BE TOWE 55100 - VEHICLE M & O 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 190.00 25-02619 CEN CAL INDUSTRIES EVIDENCE TOE FROM 1300 ELLINGTON ST TO DPD 9/2/25 LIC PL 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 190.00 25-03638 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 25-03638 EVIDDENCE TOW FROM 441 W WHITE ROCK AVE EA 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 190.00 25-02950 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 25-02950 EVIDENCE HOLD TOW FR 400 CALLE MORRIS TO DP 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 190.00 25-01372 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 25-01372 EVIDENCE TOW FROM 600 POPLAR AVE WASCO, TO 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC 03/05/2026 953 CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC 49696 $ 190.00 25-03411 CENCAL INDUSTRIES INV 25-03411 EVIDENCE TOW FR 100 GLENWOOD ST TO DPD 11/ 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC CENCAL INDUSTRIES, INC Total $ 1,400.00
03/05/2026 47 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 49697 $ 222.83 167706701030126 BUSINESS INTERNET/TV AND OTHER CHARGES/3/6/26-4/5/26 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 47 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 49697 $ 277.34 167706701030126 BUSINESS INTERNET/TV AND OTHER CHARGES/3/6/26-4/5/26 52590 - INTERNET SRVCS CIS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Total $ 500.17
03/05/2026 994 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING 49698 $ 626.00 44845 CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR THE FLOOD STUDY AT VOICE OF AMERICA PROPERTY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 994 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING 49698 $ 626.00 44845 CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR THE FLOOD STUDY AT VOICE OF AMERICA PROPERTY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 994 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING 49698 $ 1,565.00 44275 CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR THE FLOOD STUDY AT VOICE OF AMERICA PROPERTY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 994 CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING 49698 $ 1,565.00 44275 CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR THE FLOOD STUDY AT VOICE OF AMERICA PROPERTY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING Total $ 4,382.00
03/05/2026 104 CULLIGAN WATER 49699 $ 104.89 02012026 SOFTENER RENTAL 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 104 CULLIGAN WATER 49699 $ 50.68 212026 SOFTENER RENTAL 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 104 CULLIGAN WATER 49699 $ 66.89 2126 SOFTENER RENTAL 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT CULLIGAN WATER Total $ 222.46
03/05/2026 108 DACO FARM SUPPLY 49700 $ 101.41 397295 Parts for hyd. snapper (2) hyd coupler, (2) hyd coupler, (1) adapter 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 108 DACO FARM SUPPLY 49700 $ 8.51 397314 Parts for hyd. snapper (1) adapter, (1) adapter 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 108 DACO FARM SUPPLY 49700 $ 10.53 397517 Clamps for WP3 drain screen, (1) clamp, (1) clamp 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY DACO FARM SUPPLY Total $ 120.45
03/05/2026 1035 DEL-TECH GEOTECHNICAL 49701 $ 1,795.00 7454 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING FOR QUARTER 1 2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL DEL-TECH GEOTECHNICAL Total $ 1,795.00
03/05/2026 120 DELANO EQUIPMENT 49702 $ 228.10 49476 CONCRETE FOR 1400 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON 59051 - SIDEWALKS-CONC STR DELANO EQUIPMENT Total $ 228.10
03/05/2026 123 DELANO PROPANE, INC 49703 $ 990.78 171007 PROPANE FOR DIGESTER HEAT EXCHANGERS 52639 - NATURAL GAS DELANO PROPANE, INC Total $ 990.78
03/05/2026 122 DELANO VETERINARY 49704 $ 178.83 30713 DOG EXAM 59022 - ANIMAL MED SRVC ANI 03/05/2026 122 DELANO VETERINARY 49704 $ 41.56 30683 DOG EXAM 59022 - ANIMAL MED SRVC ANI 03/05/2026 122 DELANO VETERINARY 49704 $ 100.64 30873 DOG EXAM 59022 - ANIMAL MED SRVC ANI 03/05/2026 122 DELANO VETERINARY 49704 $ 67.28 31023 OFFICE VACCINATION 59022 - ANIMAL MED SRVC ANI 03/05/2026 122 DELANO VETERINARY 49704 $ 135.82 31236 DOG EXAM 59022 - ANIMAL MED SRVC ANI DELANO VETERINARY Total $ 524.13
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 1033 DELANO VETERINARY HOSPITA 49705 $ 402.65 31616 DELANO VETERINARY HOSTPITAL INV 31616 FOR K9 MAYA VISIT 2/18/26 ADULT LG BRE 55533 - K-9 PROGRAM POLICE 03/05/2026 1033 DELANO VETERINARY HOSPITA 49705 $ 176.01 31695 DELANO VET HOSPITAL INV 31695-MAYA VET VISIT FOR VACCINES 2/19/26 55533 - K-9 PROGRAM POLICE DELANO VETERINARY HOSPITA Total $ 578.66
03/05/2026 354 DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCTG OFC 49706 $ 492.00 024627 Fingerprint Apps January 2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCTG OFC Total $ 492.00
03/05/2026 128 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 49707 $ 5,100.84 SL260439 SIGNALS AND LIGHTING BILL 52510 - ELECTRICAL DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION Total $ 5,100.84
03/05/2026 100234 EQUIPMENTSHARE.COM INC 49708 $ 1,490.88 6278759-0001 Pump Rental 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 100234 EQUIPMENTSHARE.COM INC 49708 $ 358.37 6278759-0001 Pump Rental 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY EQUIPMENTSHARE.COM INC Total $ 1,849.25
03/05/2026 100239 EVEREST COMMUNICATIONS 49709 $ 1,735.00 2025049 TRI ANNUAL INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT EVEREST COMMUNICATIONS Total $ 1,735.00
03/05/2026 146 EVIDENT 49710 $ 317.84 256820A EVIDENT INV 256820A-SUPPLIES FOR PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE ROOM BARRIER POUC 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC EVIDENT Total $ 317.84
03/05/2026 1083 EXACT STAFF INC. 49711 $ 1,397.05 268833 TEMP ACCOUNTING CLERK/V.ALVAREZ/W/E 02/15/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT EXACT STAFF INC. Total $ 1,397.05
03/05/2026 149 FASTENAL COMPANY 49712 $ 67.24 CADEL120251 PPE, (12) SAFERY GLASSES 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 149 FASTENAL COMPANY 49712 $ 812.48 CADEL120248 BOLTS FOR WATER METER INSTALLATION, (120) BOLTS, (200), NUTS, (400) WASHERS, ( 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 149 FASTENAL COMPANY 49712 $ 205.76 CADEL120222 (36) cans blue paint for USA utility locate markings 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY FASTENAL COMPANY Total $ 1,085.48
03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 397.75 0052178 Gaskets for GAC Filter vessels, (4) 24in gaskets 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 30.49 0053906 Gaskets for water meters, (5) 2in gasket, (5) 1.5in gaskets 57510 - METERS,VALVES. WATE 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 8,013.31 0053817 Emergency Waterline repairs on Dover PL, (2) 4in couplings, (2) 6in couplings, (2000) ft b 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 282.51 0054972 Well 35 repairs, (2) 4x2 bushing, (4) 2in pvc flange, (4) 2in pvc coupling, (2) 4in pvc coup 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 748.66 0054973 Well 35 repairs, (1) 8in pvc tee, (2) 6in pvc elbow, (2) 6in pvc coupling, (2) 8in pvc elbow, 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 17,874.05 0055089 Waterline repair and valve replacement Contessa Ave and Consuelo St 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1091 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49713 $ 3,786.57 0055089-1 Backordered Waterline parts for Contessa Ave and Consuelo St 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FERGUSON WATERWORKS Total $ 31,133.34
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 154.00 640200A Well 34 sampling, (1) Chrom VI, (1) TCP 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 358.00 640690A GAC Plant sampling, 5 TCP samples collected on 2/3/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 195.00 640238A WEEKLY LAB ANALYSES ON SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 01/14/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 298.00 640400A SEMI-MONTHLY LAB ANALYSES ON SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 01/21/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 4,400.00 640402A QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER LAB ANALYSES ON SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 01/21/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 195.00 640598A WEEKLY LAB ANALYSES ON SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 01/28/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 154 FGL ENVIRONMENTAL 49714 $ 298.00 640756A SEMI-MONTHLY LAB ANALYSES ON SAMPLES COLLECTED ON 02/04/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL FGL ENVIRONMENTAL Total $ 5,898.00
03/05/2026 1097 FIRSTSTEP MANAGEMENT TECH 49715 $ 16,000.00 25-260 Engineering Services - Street Inventory Development & Condition Assessment 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL FIRSTSTEP MANAGEMENT TECH Total $ 16,000.00
03/05/2026 155 FLORES AFFORDABLE TOOLS 49716 $ 43.28 6895 JACKET FOR ANIMAL CONTROL 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY FLORES AFFORDABLE TOOLS Total $ 43.28
03/05/2026 100272 GABRIELA ROMERO 49717 $ 300.00 41578 Civic Center Deposit Refund for Gabriela Romero 26370 - CIVIC CENTER RENTAL GABRIELA ROMERO Total $ 300.00
03/05/2026 1112 GALLS, LLC 49718 $ 110.89 033992118 GALLS INV 033992118 2 COVERED CUFF CASES 54042 - TRAINING-RANGE POLI GALLS, LLC Total $ 110.89
03/05/2026 164 GALVAN SIGNS GRAPHICS 49719 $ 411.35 5157 GALVAN SIGNS INV# 5157-4 MAGNETS FOR CSO OFFICER VEHICLE 55100 - VEHICLE M & O GALVAN SIGNS GRAPHICS Total $ 411.35
03/05/2026 172 GLOBAL CTI GROUP 49720 $ 75.00 175525 city of delano new user diamond IT 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT GLOBAL CTI GROUP Total $ 75.00
03/05/2026 1138 GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHARD SUP 49721 $ 42.22 INV5079691 PPE, (1) RAIN SUIT 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHARD SUP Total $ 42.22
03/05/2026 178 GRAINGER 49722 $ 3,869.85 9801378705 5AJ67 TK-99E Backflow Preventer Test Kit 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 178 GRAINGER 49722 $ 319.26 9801378705 Sales Tax 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 178 GRAINGER 49722 $ 642.90 9814245610 PPE, (1) PK 25 XL CHEMICAL COVERALLS, (1) 25 PK 2XL CHEMIVAL CONVERALS 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY GRAINGER Total $ 4,832.01
03/05/2026 183 GREG'S PETROLEUM 49723 $ 28,290.15 608308 DIESEL 58584 - DIESEL CENTRAL GARA 03/05/2026 183 GREG'S PETROLEUM 49723 $ 774.15 607577 Motor Oil for Water Well Repairs, (3) 5 gallon buckets GST 68, (3) 5 gallon buckets GST 3 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN GREG'S PETROLEUM Total $ 29,064.30
03/05/2026 100095 GUADALUPE CONTRERAS 49724 $ 942.00 02/17/2026 Supervisory Course (Guadalupe Contreras) /March 2 - 13, 2026/Hunington Beach 54040 - TRAINING-POST POLICE GUADALUPE CONTRERAS Total $ 942.00
03/05/2026 190 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL 49725 $ 542.17 013E0683 Well 35 pump repair, (1) Watson pump head 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL Total $ 542.17
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 24.40 6532562 BATTERIES 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 155.22 5532601 SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 611.06 7541326 SIGNAL MAINT SUPPLIES 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 285.30 0020857 Concrete for thrust blacks, (42) 80lb concrete bags 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 19.61 0533765 PVC fittings for water meter replacement, (12) 1in PVC 45 Elbows 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 74.16 0541568 (12) 24 pk Bottled Water, CRV, (6) spray bottles 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 32.32 3534305 Well 32 painting supplies, (5) 2in flat brush, (2) metal trays 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 47.02 3534306 Weed control for well sites, (1) 2 gallon sprayer, (1) 32oz conc Roundup 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 255.47 2061246 Security safe electronic lock x2 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 799.78 7534791 SUPPLIES FOR EMERGENCY TRANSFORMER REPAIR AT WWTP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 88.66 7022074 SUPPLIES FOR EMERGENCY TRANSFORMER REPAIR AT WWTP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 161.81 3534268 General supplies, water meter replacement, (2) 10pk cut off blades, (2) 20 pk cut off blad 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 87.77 3534269 General supplies, (4) 75ct Disinfection Wipes, (1) 4pk Airwick, (1) 4pk Airwick 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 61.80 8511949 (10) 24pk Bottled Water, CRV 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 98.96 6534874 (1) 12in roof turbine, (1) 90pk tek screws, (2) 10oz sealant, (1) vent grille 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 23.77 6541984 (2) cans blue spray paint 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 35.66 6541985 (1) gallon mineral spirit, (1) pint paint sprayer cleaner 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 101.09 2535141 Well 26 painting, (6) 2in flat brushes, (4) mix container, (2) mix container, (3) 3pk liners, 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 67.96 7478607 (2) GALLONS PIPE THREADING OIL 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 302.02 7930981 SM TOOLS, (1) 20V IMAPCT WRENCH 55160 - SMALL TOOLS 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 83.80 8511951 PPE, (1) SZ8 RUBBER BOOTS, (1) SZ12 RUBBER BOOTS, (1) HARD HAT 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 18.53 7022015 (2) 80LB BAGS OF MORTAR 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 37.74 7541793 TOOLS FOR REPAIR 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 417.68 1532280 TOOLS NEEDED FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 75.68 1532301 TOOLS NEEDED FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 6.37 9542066 TOOLS NEEDED FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 32.43 8532538 TOOLS FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 150.80 6522491 TOOLS NEEDED FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 41.10 9542972 TOOLS NEED FOR REPAIR. 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 82.15 3532789 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 48.69 6063694 PITCH FORKS 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 884.69 2904721 ICE RINK SET UP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 1,555.55 8903830 REFRIGERATOR FOR JEFFERSON FIRE STATION 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 87.28 9022801 PARTS FOR WATER PIPE REPAIR AT WWTP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 195 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS 49727 $ 49.09 5522832 LOCK SHELTER TRASH BINS, FILTER FOR VACUME, TORY BIT SET FOR SHELTER 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES HOME DEPOT CREDIT SVCS Total $ 6,905.42
03/05/2026 197 HOPKINS CONSULTING 49728 $ 6,272.60 CD-26-04 ENGINEERING INSPECTION SERVICES, AGREEMENT NO. 2015-6, FEBRUARY 12 - FEBRU 55528 - ENGINEERING SRV HOPKINS CONSULTING Total $ 6,272.60
03/05/2026 203 ISOLVED INC. 49729 $ 255.20 I151634391 COBRA Notices Feb 2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL ISOLVED INC. Total $ 255.20
03/05/2026 209 JIM BURKE FORD 49730 $ 764.38 793092 OXYGEN SENSOR REPLACEMENT ON VEHICLE 57017 55100 - VEHICLE M & O JIM BURKE FORD Total $ 764.38
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49731 $ 97,928.84 2480 EMERGENCY STORM -SEWER LINE REPAIR AT 18TH AVE AND TERRACE DR. 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49731 $ 50,000.00 2482 REMOVE EXISTING WATER MAIN INSIDE CASING UNDER SR99, SLIDE NEW C900 WATER 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49731 $ 24,459.02 2479 EMERGENCY SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT ON THE 1,000 BLOCK OF HIGH ST. 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. Total $ 172,387.86
03/05/2026 570 JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY 49732 $ 305.64 42076587 Quarterly Billing-Recurring Service 02/01/26-04/30/26 55534 - 1% of Safety TRANSIT JOHNSON CONTROLS SECURITY Total $ 305.64
03/05/2026 212 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH 49733 $ 142,198.51 276293254553 Health Insurance Premiums- March 23191 - MEDICAL INSURANCE L KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH Total $ 142,198.51
03/05/2026 226 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 49734 $ 647.37 282026 PARKS AREAS CLEAN UP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 226 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 49734 $ 89.89 282026 DISTRICT AREAS CLEAN UP 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 226 KERN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 49734 $ 5,660.79 282026 SWEEPER HAUL AWAY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY KERN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS Total $ 6,398.05
03/05/2026 100270 KERN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS 49735 $ 216.82 610582 FUSES FOR EFFLUENT PUMP STATION 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY KERN ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTORS Total $ 216.82
03/05/2026 1287 KRC SAFETY CO., INC. 49736 $ 495.27 72327 DELINEATORS FOR HIGH ST 59020 - TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET KRC SAFETY CO., INC. Total $ 495.27
03/05/2026 244 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 49737 $ 3,571.50 316271 January 31st Invoice General Matters 55529 - LEGAL SERVICES CITY A LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE Total $ 3,571.50
03/05/2026 1311 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. 49738 $ 3,038.90 4942402187 Life Insurance Premiums- March 23193 - LIFE INSURANCE LIABIL LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. Total $ 3,038.90
03/05/2026 100044 LIZ MORRIS 49739 $ 373.25 02/25/2026 Liz Morris Travel Request - Sacramento League of California Cities/01/22/2026 54000 - TRAVEL, CONFERENCE LIZ MORRIS Total $ 373.25
03/05/2026 247 LOOP ELECTRIC 49740 $ 110,557.20 PAY APP NO. 2 Traffic Signals & Lighting Installation on 11th Avenue at Fremont Street and 11th Avenue 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 247 LOOP ELECTRIC 49741 $ 326.00 1998 BROWNING RD SIGNAL REPAIR 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY LOOP ELECTRIC Total $ 110,883.20
03/05/2026 100203 MARIA PRECIADO 49742 $ 45.00 41628 8-9U Refund for Gabriel Mendez 32780 - YOUTH SPORTS MARIA PRECIADO Total $ 45.00
03/05/2026 100277 MICHAEL ENRIQUEZ 49743 $ 36.78 02272026 Colonial Reimbursement 23230 - COLONIAL INS. EMPLOY MICHAEL ENRIQUEZ Total $ 36.78
03/05/2026 271 NELMS SURVEYING INC. 49744 $ 943.75 263472B-2 Engineering Services for Offer of Dedication at Belmont St 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL NELMS SURVEYING INC. Total $ 943.75
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 28.77 456706834001 PENS 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 148.90 457911793001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 98.24 450682746001 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR WWTP 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 214.31 450680553001 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR WWTP 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 121.84 459114931001 ODP INV 459114931001 TONER FOR WATCH COMNDR OFFICE- 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ (121.84) 458924445001 ODP CREDIT 458924445001-TONER NEVER RECEIVED IN FIRST ORDER 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ 245.55 458169672001 Office Supplies 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1439 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L 49745 $ (123.07) 456802457001 ODP CREDIT 456802457001 TONER THAT WAS NO LONGER NEEDED 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L Total $ 612.70
03/05/2026 100041 OPENGOV, INC. 49746 $ 499.50 INV25337 Admin Certification Budgeting and Performance (April 27 - 28) 54000 - TRAVEL, CONFERENCE 03/05/2026 100041 OPENGOV, INC. 49746 $ 499.50 INV25337 Admin Certification Budgeting and Performance (April 27 - 28) 54000 - TRAVEL, CONFERENCE OPENGOV, INC. Total $ 999.00
03/05/2026 1453 P & J ELECTRIC, INC 49747 $ 1,208.32 9730 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE AT WWTP 52515 - ELEC MAINT CNTR SEW P & J ELECTRIC, INC Total $ 1,208.32
03/05/2026 1455 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVIC 49748 $ 551.81 37505 POSTS AND ANCHORS/11TH AVE RRFB INSTALL 59020 - TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVIC Total $ 551.81
03/05/2026 286 PACIFIC TIRE #6 49749 $ 27.70 41548 UNIT 131 FLAT REPAIR 55100 - VEHICLE M & O PACIFIC TIRE #6 Total $ 27.70
03/05/2026 100039 PEAC SOLUTIONS 49750 $ 366.83 41661500 Engineering Plotter fees, February 15 - March 14, 2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT PEAC SOLUTIONS Total $ 366.83
03/05/2026 1478 PLATT 49751 $ 25.12 7C20577 Fuse for transformer at Well 35 (1) 20 amp fuse 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 1478 PLATT 49751 $ 75.39 7C23821 Fuses for transformer at Well 35 (3) 20 amp fuse 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 1478 PLATT 49751 $ 93.05 7C25338 Control fuses for Well 35, (2) 20 amp, (5) 4 amp, (5) 2 amp, (5) 100mA, (5) 500 mA 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 1478 PLATT 49751 $ 34.61 7C25366 Parts organizer for 72069, (1) packout 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY PLATT Total $ 228.17
03/05/2026 1485 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO,IN 49752 $ 526.00 B96902 BACK UP BATTERY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY 03/05/2026 1485 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO,IN 49752 $ 526.00 B96903 BACKUP BATTERY 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO,IN Total $ 1,052.00
03/05/2026 299 PREMIER ACCESS INSURANCE 49753 $ 29.87 3302966 Dental Insurance Premiums- March 23191 - MEDICAL INSURANCE L PREMIER ACCESS INSURANCE Total $ 29.87
03/05/2026 1514 PRIMO BRANDS 49754 $ 303.11 06B8710004908 DRINKING WATER/GENERAL SUPPLIES/1/15/26-2/14/26 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 1514 PRIMO BRANDS 49754 $ 117.58 06B8710004908 DRINKING WATER/GENERAL SUPPLIES/1/15/26-2/14/26 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 03/05/2026 1514 PRIMO BRANDS 49754 $ 287.53 06B8710004908 DRINKING WATER/GENERAL SUPPLIES/1/15/26-2/14/26 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY PRIMO BRANDS Total $ 708.22
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 1493 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 49755 $ 7,677.07 127750 Engineering Services for the 2025 Safe Routes to School Master Plan, Council Approval A 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 1493 PROVOST & PRITCHARD 49755 $ 9,160.00 128150 ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF THE PROJECT STUDY REPORT F 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL PROVOST & PRITCHARD Total $ 16,837.07
03/05/2026 301 QUAD/KNOPF, INC 49756 $ 21,183.40 131015 On-Call Planning Services, Agreement No. 2021-45, January 18 - February 14, 2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 301 QUAD/KNOPF, INC 49756 $ 46,812.50 131016 Engineering Services, Agreement No. 2025-06, January 18 - February 18, 2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/05/2026 301 QUAD/KNOPF, INC 49756 $ 1,050.00 131016 Construction Engineering Services for Browning & County Line Road Traffic Signal Projec 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS QUAD/KNOPF, INC Total $ 69,045.90
03/05/2026 100240 RICARDO CHAVEZ 49757 $ 47.85 02/19/2026 Ricardo Travel, Recorders Office/02/05/2026/MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 54000 - TRAVEL, CONFERENCE RICARDO CHAVEZ Total $ 47.85
03/05/2026 1537 ROBERT HALF 49758 $ 1,036.80 65837999 TEMP Guevara,Daisy 01/16/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1537 ROBERT HALF 49758 $ 1,192.54 65841982 TEMP Guevara,Daisy 01/23/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1537 ROBERT HALF 49758 $ 1,298.59 65941658 TEMP Guevara,Daisy 02/20/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT ROBERT HALF Total $ 3,527.93
03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 71.00 10859379 TRANSIT ALARM MONITORING 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 71.00 10860206 ALARM MONITORING COMMUNITY CENTER 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 131.85 10860159 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 131.85 10859632 ALARM MONITORING MULTI PURPOSE CENTER 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 131.85 10858993 ALARM MONITORING SENIOR CENTER 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1586 SEBASTIAN 49759 $ 91.25 10858716 ALARM MONITORING TECH CENTER 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT SEBASTIAN Total $ 628.80
03/05/2026 333 SEVIER'S AUTO SUPPLY 49760 $ 151.53 102488 RRFB BATTERIES REPLACEMENT 59020 - TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET 03/05/2026 333 SEVIER'S AUTO SUPPLY 49760 $ 4.51 104204 (1) spark plug for water pump 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY SEVIER'S AUTO SUPPLY Total $ 156.04
03/05/2026 1600 SIGNA MECHANICAL 49761 $ 1,665.81 260160 SHOP SERVICE TO REPAIR PUMP CORE INCLUDES LABOR IN SHOP FOR DIAGNOSIS AN 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1600 SIGNA MECHANICAL 49761 $ 323.75 260160 REPAIR COSTS HIGHER THAN QUOTED 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1600 SIGNA MECHANICAL 49761 $ 950.81 251205 SPECIAL REPAIR PUMP SOCCER PARK 56020 - REPAIRS, SP EQUIPMEN SIGNA MECHANICAL Total $ 2,940.37
03/05/2026 338 SJVAPCD 49762 $ 120.00 381215 ANNUAL BURN PERMIT FOR WWTP 58862 - MANDATED COSTS 03/05/2026 1609 SJVAPCD 49763 $ 906.00 S186793 FACILITY ID S10494 58862 - MANDATED COSTS SJVAPCD Total $ 1,026.00
03/05/2026 339 SMART & FINAL 49764 $ 228.50 119922 COFFEE AND SUPPLIES 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 339 SMART & FINAL 49764 $ 186.52 382822 SMART AND FINAL-WATER AND SNACKS FOR THE CITIZENS ACADEMY BEING HOSTED B 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 339 SMART & FINAL 49764 $ 93.74 247500 Youth Soccer Championship Party Supplies 59017 - YOUTH PROGRAMS REC SMART & FINAL Total $ 508.76
03/05/2026 1619 SOLENIS, LLC 49765 $ 10,966.34 0135309466 POLYMER FOR BIOSOLIDS 90000 - CAPITAL OUTLAY SOLENIS, LLC Total $ 10,966.34
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 781 SOPHIA MUNOZ ALVAREZ 49766 $ 350.00 20260217 Delano Council meeting interpretation 02/17/2026 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL SOPHIA MUNOZ ALVAREZ Total $ 350.00
03/05/2026 1628 SOUTH VALLEY MECHANICAL 49767 $ 2,827.50 10000491 SERVICE CALL P.D. 56071 - REPAIRS & MAINTENAN SOUTH VALLEY MECHANICAL Total $ 2,827.50
03/05/2026 1629 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 49768 $ 1,337.87 609201 NEW METER AND SERVICE 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/05/2026 1629 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO 49768 $ 965.16 608104 Traffic Signal at County Line Road and Randolph St project 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISO Total $ 2,303.03
03/05/2026 347 SPD PRINTING 49769 $ 411.35 6715 Business Cards for Admin 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY SPD PRINTING Total $ 411.35
03/05/2026 355 STERICYCLE INC 49770 $ 3,424.06 8013457126 STERICYCLE INV 8013457126 WASTE HAZARDOUSE MATERIALS PICK UP PERIOD SERVI 57002 - EVIDENCE SUPP POLIC STERICYCLE INC Total $ 3,424.06
03/05/2026 357 STINSON'S 49771 $ 229.51 368188-0 STINSONS INV 368188-0 DISINFECTING WIPES AND DOORSTOP FOR ADMIN 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/05/2026 357 STINSON'S 49771 $ 115.83 368744-0 STINSONS INV 368744-0 TONER FOR WATCH COMMANDERS OFFICE 53000 - OFFICE SUPPLIES STINSON'S Total $ 345.34
03/05/2026 966 SUMEET BATTH CHAVEZ 49772 $ 97.01 AP 0000071 Championship Youth Soccer Pizza Party 59017 - YOUTH PROGRAMS REC SUMEET BATTH CHAVEZ Total $ 97.01
03/05/2026 1661 TAPCO INC. 49773 $ 346.76 I816366 11TH AND GLENWOOD RRFB 59020 - TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET TAPCO INC. Total $ 346.76
03/05/2026 367 TEL-TEC 49774 $ 30.00 910641 CORP YARD ALARM MONITORING FEB 2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 367 TEL-TEC 49774 $ 135.00 909946 COMMERCIAL MONITORING WATER PLANTS 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT TEL-TEC Total $ 165.00
03/05/2026 1675 THE COLLINS GROUP, INC 49775 $ 779.55 I01361048 US AND CALIFORNIA FLAGS (7 TOTAL) 11040 - INVENTORY THE COLLINS GROUP, INC Total $ 779.55
03/05/2026 1678 THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK 49776 $ 6,062.89 1064 0126 The Open Door Network 2-25-26 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK Total $ 6,062.89
03/05/2026 374 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION 49777 $ 1,304.36 3009264211 ELEVATOR SERVICE 2/01/26-04/30/26 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION Total $ 1,304.36
03/05/2026 1686 TOP DOG TRAINING CENTER 49778 $ 125.00 2055 TOP DOG INV 2055-K9 MAYA SERVICE 2/21/26 55533 - K-9 PROGRAM POLICE TOP DOG TRAINING CENTER Total $ 125.00
03/05/2026 1698 TRILOGY MEDWASTE WEST LLC 49779 $ 148.75 1879544 MED WASTE 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT TRILOGY MEDWASTE WEST LLC Total $ 148.75
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/05/2026 383 TROPHIES'S ETC 49780 $ 81.19 112969 Trophies for Soccer 59017 - YOUTH PROGRAMS REC TROPHIES'S ETC Total $ 81.19
03/05/2026 394 UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATE 49781 $ 659.61 263537 TEMP ZAVALA, J. W.E.282026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT UNITED STAFFING ASSOCIATE Total $ 659.61
03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 662.18 53671988 Well 22, 175 Gallons Caustic used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 1,551.40 53671990 Well 26, 410 gallons Caustic Soda for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 712.34 53671992 Well 26, 107 gal Sulfuric used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 832.45 53671993 Well 39, 220 gal Caustic Soda used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 1,068.89 53687768 Well 22, 200 gallons Sulfuric used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 699.02 53687770 Well 26, 105 gal Sulfuric used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 1,608.15 53687771 Well 26, 425 gallons Caustic Soda for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 1,702.75 53687773 Well 24, 450 gallons Caustic Soda used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 794.62 53687774 Well 22, 210 gallons Caustic Soda used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT 03/05/2026 1717 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS 49782 $ 605.42 53687775 Well 39, 160 gal Caustic Soda used for water treatment 57517 - ARSENIC SUPLIES WAT UNIVAR SOLUTIONS Total $ 10,237.22
03/05/2026 1746 VERONICA TAM & ASSOCIATES 49783 $ 6,068.00 3743 Delano CP 2026-2030 - 287.20 52092 - GENERAL ADMIN VERONICA TAM & ASSOCIATES Total $ 6,068.00
03/05/2026 1774 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT 49784 $ 63.12 0080721617 CYLINDER RENTAL WWTP 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1774 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT 49784 $ 159.84 0080721616 CYLINDER RENTAL GARAGE 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/05/2026 1774 WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT 49784 $ 137.76 0080721615 CYLINDER RENTAL WATER 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT WESTAIR GASES & EQUIPMENT Total $ 360.72
03/05/2026 1776 WESTERN ENGRAVERS SUPPLY 49785 $ 410.28 145030 DOG TAGS ONLY SOURCE 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY WESTERN ENGRAVERS SUPPLY Total $ 410.28
03/05/2026 1777 WEX BANK 49786 $ 33.04 110676433 FUEL PURCHASES/BILL CLOSING DATE 02/23/2026/PD 55110 - VEH. M/O - FUEL WEX BANK Total $ 33.04
03/05/2026 1778 WHITE CAP, LP. 49787 $ 577.84 10023046915 CONCRETE BLOCKS FOR MID XWALK SIGNS 59020 - TRAFFIC SAFETY STREET WHITE CAP, LP. Total $ 577.84
03/05/2026 1766 WM CORPORATE SERVICES, IN 49788 $ 206.08 0086076-0165-8 CONTAINER CHARGE THROUGH JAN 31 25 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT WM CORPORATE SERVICES, IN Total $ 206.08
03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49789 $ 75,610.43 2485 EMERGENCY STORM -SEWER LINE REPAIR AT 18TH AVE AND TERRACE DR. 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49789 $ 56,446.52 2484 EMERGENCY SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT ON THE 1,000 BLOCK OF HIGH ST. 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS 03/05/2026 1233 JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. 49790 $ 34,280.58 2483 EMERGENCY SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT ON THE 1,000 BLOCK OF HIGH ST. 95000 - CAPITAL PROJECTS JM PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION INC. Total $ 166,337.53
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/12/2026 100008 BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 49791 $ 500.00 AP 0000073 BOE processing fees for Annexation 59 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Total $ 500.00
03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 365.77 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 1,832.30 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 4,236.75 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 2,379.21 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 582.35 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 467.28 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52570 - REFUSE 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 4,447.03 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 4,913.13 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 157.40 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 1,174.84 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 149.47 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 2,865.09 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 3,222.86 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52560 - SEWER MCCF 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 13.12 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52570 - REFUSE 03/12/2026 119 DELANO, CITY OF - WATER 49792 $ 635.98 MARCH-26 INTERNAL WATER BILLING/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52550 - WATER DELANO, CITY OF - WATER Total $ 27,442.58
03/12/2026 1118 GARDA CL WEST, INC 49793 $ 897.13 10842243 ARMORED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES/MARCH 2026 55590 - BANK SVC FEE 03/12/2026 1118 GARDA CL WEST, INC 49793 $ 897.13 10839953 ARMORED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES/FEBRUARY 2026 55590 - BANK SVC FEE 03/12/2026 1118 GARDA CL WEST, INC 49793 $ 82.49 20660258 ARMORED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES/EXCESS ITEMS/JANUARY 2026 55590 - BANK SVC FEE GARDA CL WEST, INC Total $ 1,876.75
03/12/2026 1259 KERN LAFCO 49794 $ 288.68 1868 LAFCo Annexation 59 Posting fees 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL KERN LAFCO Total $ 288.68
03/12/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49795 $ 10,300.00 DLO000231 AIPORT MANAGEMENT 03012026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/12/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49795 $ 10,300.00 DLO000180 AIPORT MANAGEMENT 11012025 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/12/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49795 $ 10,300.00 DLO000205 AIPORT MANAGEMENT 1012026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/12/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49795 $ 1,769.48 205579 LEASE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING FEE JAN2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT 03/12/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49795 $ 1,299.79 205536 LEASE MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING FEE DEC2025 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT LOYD'S AVIATION Total $ 33,969.27
03/12/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49796 $ 15.84 03/10/2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MAINTENANCE DISTRS 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/12/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49796 $ 153.46 02/24/2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/STREETS/FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON Total $ 169.30
03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 100.53 211238 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 112.83 211233 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 588.60 211232 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 37.61 211219 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52570 - REFUSE 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 99.12 211197 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 100.53 211194 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 33.51 211183 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 33.51 211179 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 33.51 211178 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 100.53 211174 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 185.67 211017 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 182.35 210979 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 119.61 210946 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 81.82 210835 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 978.10 210810 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 90.75 210809 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 258.30 210808 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 289.11 210807 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 182.43 210806 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 90.75 210804 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 115.41 210803 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 210.60 210802 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 38.47 210801 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 76.94 210801 FEBRUARY 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 106.68 212920 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 112.83 212915 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 640.08 212914 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 37.61 212901 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52570 - REFUSE 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 105.27 212880 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 106.68 212877 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 35.56 212866 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 35.56 212862 MARCH 2026/COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE, REFUSE SERVICES 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 35.56 212861 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/COMMERCIAL/GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 191.82 212702 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/COMMERCIAL/GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 188.50 212664 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 81.82 212523 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 1,017.36 212498 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 92.80 212497 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 270.60 212496 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 295.26 212495 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 188.58 212494 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 92.80 212492 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 117.46 212491 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 222.90 212490 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 39.15 212489 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER 03/12/2026 1626 SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE 49798 $ 78.31 212489 MARCH 2026/REFUSE SERVICES/RECYCLABLES, COMMERCIAL, GATE FEE 52550 - WATER SOUTH TULARE-RICHGROVE REFUSE Total $ 8,233.78
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/12/2026 100213 TREVIPAY 49799 $ 262.79 90D32F57 DOG FOOD 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/12/2026 100213 TREVIPAY 49799 $ 510.54 72D76A45 DOG FOOD 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/12/2026 100213 TREVIPAY 49799 $ 487.48 FEC7845A DOG FOOD 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/12/2026 100213 TREVIPAY 49799 $ 323.52 D9B05F55 DOG FOOD 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY TREVIPAY Total $ 1,584.33
03/13/2026 5 AFLAC 49800 $ 3,132.92 3132026 AFLAC 23231 - AFLAC VOLUNTARY AFLAC Total $ 3,132.92
03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 46.15 3132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 190.96 03132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 74.76 103132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 292.15 203132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 900.00 033132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 276.92 403132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 881.53 503132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 69.23 603132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 92.30 703132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO 03/13/2026 56 CA SDU 49801 $ 182.76 803132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO CA SDU Total $ 3,006.76
03/13/2026 979 COBRA PROFESSIONALS, INC 49802 $ 2,720.06 3132026 S 125 Medical Reimbursement 23190 - HEALTH INSURANCE COBRA PROFESSIONALS, INC Total $ 2,720.06
03/13/2026 90 COLONIAL SUPPLEMENTAL 49803 $ 445.96 3132026 Colonial Life Ins. 23230 - COLONIAL INS. EMPLOY COLONIAL SUPPLEMENTAL Total $ 445.96
03/13/2026 1027 DELANO CITY EMPLOYEES ASS 49804 $ 2,055.00 3132026 MISC EE Dues 23234 - GEN. SRP. DUES-EMPLO DELANO CITY EMPLOYEES ASS Total $ 2,055.00
03/13/2026 143 EMPLOYEE PENSION TRUST FD 49805 $ 24,832.43 3132026 3400-3405 Retirement/EE 23152 - PERS - EE CONTRIBUTIO 03/13/2026 143 EMPLOYEE PENSION TRUST FD 49805 $ 113,617.22 03132026 4401- 4402 Retirement/ER 23152 - PERS - EE CONTRIBUTIO 03/13/2026 143 EMPLOYEE PENSION TRUST FD 49805 $ 8,245.79 103132026 4403-4404 Retirement/ER 23152 - PERS - EE CONTRIBUTIO EMPLOYEE PENSION TRUST FD Total $ 146,695.44
03/13/2026 182 EMPOWER ANNUITY 49806 $ 189.86 3132026 Empower Loan 23532 - GREAT WEST DEF. COM 03/13/2026 182 EMPOWER ANNUITY 49806 $ 855.15 03132026 Empower Roth Contribution 23532 - GREAT WEST DEF. COM 03/13/2026 182 EMPOWER ANNUITY 49806 $ 3,546.83 103132026 Empower EE DC PD 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP EMPOWER ANNUITY Total $ 4,591.84
03/13/2026 157 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 49807 $ 2.48 3132026 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Total $ 2.48
03/13/2026 245 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS 49808 $ 2,300.91 3132026 Lincoln National Voluntary Life Ins. 23232 - LINCOLN VOLUNTARY LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS Total $ 2,300.91
Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/13/2026 100212 MISSION SQUARE 49809 $ 11,048.76 3132026 Mission Square EE 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP 03/13/2026 100212 MISSION SQUARE 49809 $ 528.35 03132026 Mission Square ER PD 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP 03/13/2026 100212 MISSION SQUARE 49809 $ 2,386.88 103132026 Mission Square Loans 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP MISSION SQUARE Total $ 13,963.99
03/13/2026 1376 MISSION SQUARE - RHS 49810 $ 92.30 3132026 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP 03/13/2026 1376 MISSION SQUARE - RHS 49810 $ 92.30 03132026 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP 03/13/2026 1376 MISSION SQUARE - RHS 49810 $ 92.30 103132026 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP MISSION SQUARE - RHS Total $ 276.90
03/13/2026 100002 POLICE ASSOCIATION 49811 $ 2,654.00 3132026 POLICE DUES 23531 - ICMA DEFERRED COMP POLICE ASSOCIATION Total $ 2,654.00
03/13/2026 322 SAFE 1 CREDIT UNION -322273609 49812 $ 100.00 3132026 Safe 1 Credit Union 23533 - CREDIT UNION PAY-EM SAFE 1 CREDIT UNION -322273609 Total $ 100.00
03/13/2026 158 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 49813 $ 479.07 3132026 JONAS, B ACCT #111-98085-73 ORDER #2620000000001303 23180 - MISC. DED PAY-EMPLO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Total $ 479.07
03/17/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49814 $ 3,255.00 BA_9357_2025 DEL Grant Research and Support/NOVEMBER 2025 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL 03/17/2026 874 BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC 49814 $ 1,787.16 BA_9325_2025 GM HUD CPF- Well 42 Equipping and Treatment 2025-2032 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL BLAIS & ASSOCIATES, LLC Total $ 5,042.16
03/17/2026 943 EPIFANIO CEJA 49815 $ 58.00 091925 CLASS A RENEWAL REIMB. 55524 - PROF/TECHNICAL EPIFANIO CEJA Total $ 58.00
03/17/2026 99999 JERRY NICHOLSON 49816 $ 299.00 6/25/2025 POST EXECUTIVE SEMINAR/9/3-9/5/2025/PISMO BEACH, CA 54040 - TRAINING-POST POLICE JERRY NICHOLSON Total $ 299.00
03/17/2026 1323 LOYD'S AVIATION 49817 $ 10,300.00 DLO000214 AIPORT MANAGEMENT 02/01/2026 55522 - CONTRACTUAL MNT LOYD'S AVIATION Total $ 10,300.00
03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 95.67 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 188.01 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 1,759.91 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 33,007.79 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 341.94 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 487.67 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Check # Line Item Value Invoice # Line Item Description Object and Obj description

CITY OF DELANO
WARRANT REGISTER/CITY COUNCIL MEETING 04/06/2026
03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 103,174.31 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 50.87 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 30.31 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 4,737.50 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL 03/17/2026 341 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 49818 $ 7,138.80 MARCH-2026 ELECTRICITY SERVICES/MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS/MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2026 52510 - ELECTRICAL SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON Total $ 151,012.78
03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 76.02 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 78.02 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 116.03 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 38.01 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 172.30 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 236.66 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 179.85 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 144.26 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 38.01 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 152.84 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 38.37 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 118.03 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 40.01 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 57000 - GENERAL SUPPLY 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 34.33 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 10.23 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 1,202.75 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 13.69 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 68.66 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 114.03 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 3,668.81 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE 03/17/2026 404 VERIZON WIRELESS 49819 $ 1,170.26 6136835228 Cell phone , data card, laptop use/multiple departments Jan 24 - Feb 23, 2026 52530 - TELEPHONE VERIZON WIRELESS Total $ 7,711.17
Grand Total 1,561,928.69 SUB TOTAL $ 1,561,928.69
TOTAL $ 1,561,928.69
PAYROLL - 03/13/2026 $ 871,955.64
TOTAL $ 871,955.64
GRAND TOTAL $ 2,433,884.33

MINUTES

CITY OF DELANO
CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING
March 16, 2026

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1015 – 11th Avenue.

INVOCATION
Pastor David Vivas offered the invocation.

FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz led the flag salute.

ROLL CALL
Council members present: Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mario Nunez, Joe Alindajao (arrived at 5:35pm), Liz Morris, Bryan Osorio (arrived at 5:21pm)
Council members absent: None

OFFICIALS PRESENT
City Manager Reyna, City Clerk Chavez, City Attorney Hensley, Finance Director Lara Rios, Police Chief Nicholson, Human Resources Director Zamudio, Interim Community Development Director Dowling (via teleconference), Public Works Director Nunez, City Engineer Rodriguez, Economic Development Specialist Fernandez and IS Coordinator Reyes

PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz announced the representatives for American Red Cross and Cesar E. Chavez Day could not attend the meeting.
• Mayor Solorio-Ruiz presented the proclamation for Government Finance Professionals Week for March 23–27, 2026.

ITEMS FROM THE PUBLIC

1. Roberto Ibarra – “Good evening. Ladies and gentlemen, my name is Roberto Ibarra, the landlord citizen. I want to bring you this, the things that I find on my whereabouts. I don't want to be disrespectful to anybody. I just want to see that I find things that I don't know that I find on many things. Some of this stuff is prohibited. I don't know if it's allowed here in Delano or our kids go out of the county and get them. I don't know. That's what I just want to emphasize that my trust is on you, so I emphasize on you. Another thing is that since I live on the west side, the park, and I want to see if benches, people can sit around on the benches on the benches in the afternoon when it's cool, can sit around the park. Not regular benches looking at each other where people have a picnic, but more or less benches just from one sided, looking at maybe at the sunset or Agenda Item: 3
whatever. So people can sit around, relax. I don't know. Something that make the park more enticing, especially for ... We getting old. We are not able to sit on the ground and stuff like that.

So, if you can please do so. Thank you very much.”

2. Eunice Romero – “Hi, my name's Euncie Romero. I live at 317 Glenwood Street. And I don't know if you guys are able to fix it, but on Wooloomes by the freeway, all that, the lights. And there's the entrance that turns into the freeway and then there's the regular lanes to go straight.

Well, people use the freeway entrance to go straight. They want to beat the traffic. And there's been some close calls that I've been in where people just swoop in. And I was just wanting to know if there could be some kind of barrier or, I don't know, something put into deter people from impeding. If they choose to go in that lane to turn onto the freeway, that's their choice. They're stuck just kind of turning in there or to keep them from just causing an incident that doesn't need to be because they're in a hurry or they just ... I don't know, but it can be kind of dangerous. And for new drivers and kids, I don't know, it's just dangerous and people don't think about those things. And like I said, I've been in a few close calls where I've almost been hit or just kind of rammed into by people who are trying to go around me. So, I don't know if that's something that has been brought up before, but it's been an issue since that whole thing has been implemented.

So I don't know if you guys can do something about it or lights. I don't know what can be done, but if ... Yeah, that's my concern today. Thank you.”

3. Maria Martinez (via interpreter) – “Good Afternoon to all. I am here to support what the lady before me said. This happened to me on Saturday when I went to Walmart. Cars just go in, they turn like this. They go into the line. They were about five cars that were coming from the Target.

The line was really behind and they were just getting into the freeway and then came cause an accident. The bad thing is that they go in this way. We're the ones who are going to ram into them and the one who hits is the one who pays, so we need something to be done. Over at Lexington, it's like they're racing. So where is the police? I see police patrol cars over here, like three parks, three patrol cars park over here and the cars are over here racing like crazy. And I'm sorry, sir. I had something else in mind. When I come from walking over here in 11, I know there's like electric charger pumps for electric cars. But are they used for decoration or for what? Because they're just being there for a long time now. I think it's just a waste of money. Thank you.

4. Timothy Aguilar – “Good evening, Mr. Mayor and members of city council. One of my concerns that I have in here in town… My name's Timothy Aguilar. Two of my concerns is if we can provide better healthcare, well, better doctors and physicians here in town, because I'm pretty sure everyone deserves better doctors who know what they're doing. And my second question is, when are we as citizens or when will we be given the opportunity to vote for our mayor? Thank you.”

5. Diana – “Hi, good evening. My name's Diana, and I'm a citizen of Delano. And my concern is I live on Cabrillo Way and it's close to Albany Park School. And on Clark, that's Clark and Albany.

On that turn, I've lived there for a year. I've asked to put bumps or something because the cars turned so fast. It's crazy. Maybe about two months ago, one of my dogs got out and they ran over them because the car just flies by. But my concern is more for the kids when they get out of school because I have my son that goes across the street also in the future, hopefully. But the cars there are always rampaging. Crazy. And I've called the police department. By the time they get there, obviously there's no cars rampaging there or anything like that. But yeah, I do have a concern if maybe you guys can put bumps or slow or maybe watch, have the police watch there days in, days out so cars can stop driving so fast through the street. I live on 309 North Cabrillo Way. It's the second house from the corner.”

CONSENT AGENDA
1) Authorization to waive the reading of any ordinance in its entirety and consenting to the reading of such ordinances by title only.
2) Warrant Register in the amount of $2,847,022.99
3) Minutes of regular Council meeting of March 2, 2026
4) Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with and accept grant funds in the amount of $2,000,000 from the State of California, Board of State & Community Corrections and authorizing the City Manager, or her designee, to take other actions and to execute all related documents necessary to carry out the purpose of the grant award (Resolution No. 2026-09)
5) Approval of resolution authorizing the use of California Office of Traffic Safety Traffic Records Improvement Project grant funds and Police Department general fund monies to enter into agreements with Crossroads, Sun Ridge Systems, and Vantage ID to purchase and implement an electronic citation system in a total project amount not to exceed $57,871 (Resolution No. 2026-10) (Agreement No. 2026-09a) (Agreement No. 2026- 09b) (Agreement No. 2026-09c) (Agreement No. 2026-09d)
6) Acceptance of the 2025 CDBG 11th Place Watermain Replacement Project and authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion
7) Approval of task order to Agreement No. 2025-06 with QK Inc. for $207,040.00 to provide environmental compliance and documentation services for the High Street Flyover Project, and authorizing the City Manager, or her designee, to sign any documents needed to carry out this project (Continued to April 6, 2026) 8) Report on the status of the local emergency regarding the failed Storm-Sewer Main located on 18th Avenue and Terrace Drive pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050 9) Report on the status of the local emergency regarding the failed Sewer Main located on 1000 High Street Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050 10) Approval of a formal invitation to Delano’s Sister City of Tangancícuaro, Michoacán to visit the City of Delano
Motion was made to table item No. 7 to April 6, 2026 by: Nunez; 2nd by: Osorio
Vote: 4-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: Alindajao
Abstentions: None
Motion was made by: Nunez to approved items 1-4, 6, 8-10 on consent items; 2nd by: Morris
Vote: 4-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: Alindajao
Abstentions: None
Item No. 5 pulled by: Guadalupe Martinez
Reason for pulling item: “Guadalupe Martinez. Deleno, I have some questions on this. Number five, it talks about an electronic citation system. So, is it for citations? From what I read, it's about documenting when there's crashes or there's accidents. However, I have seen and been ... Nowadays, you call the police officer or the police department, and they claim or they ask you if there were anybody injured. If not, then just exchange information. So, I don't see how this electronic citation is going to help in any of those things.”
Chief of Police Nicholson – “Honorable Mayor and Council, this item is electronic citation printers. So traditionally, police officers will write out the citation on a triplicate form. This is a computer system that will scan the driver's license of the motorist and populate most of the fields. The officer will just have to input a few of the fields to complete the citation. This is being paid for out of the California Office of Traffic Safety Traffic Records Improvement Project Grant that we were approved, $47,000 of that will be paid for out of the grant and an $11,000 will be paid out of the police department's general fund. As far as the traffic collision data, that is just a component of the citation printers that will be used. It collects the data, and when it collects the data, it's able to regurgitate out stats that we will need. So, it's a byproduct of having this system.”
Council Member Alindajao arrived at 5:35pm.

Motion was made to approved item no. 5 by: Nunez;
2nd by: Morris
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None

PUBLIC HEARINGS
11) Resolution of Initiation of Annexation and Pre-Zoning Ordinance related to PreZoning Application No. 25-0002. A request to (i) pre-zone an approximately 122.49- acre property (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 521-120-14 and 521-120-15) from the Kern County Exclusive Agriculture (A) zoning district to the City of Delano Industrial (I) zoning district. Staff has determined the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning). THIS ITEM WILL BE CONTINUED TO APRIL 20, 2026
Motion was made to continue matter to April 20, 2026 by: Nunez; 2nd by: Osorio
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
12) Resolutions establishing the formation of a community facilities district, calling a special election for a community facilities district, and declaring results of a special landowner election and directing the recording of a special tax lien. Introduce an ordinance authorizing the levy of special taxes in a community facilities district (Resolution No. 2026-11) (Resolution No. 2026-12) (Resolution No. 2026-13) Mayor Solorio-Ruiz opened the public hearing.

Staff Report provided by City Engineer Rodriguez.

Mayor Solorio-Ruiz opened public comment.

No public comments.

Mayor Solorio-Ruiz closed public comment.

Motion was made for approval of resolution forming and establishing Community Facilities District No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2), and authorizing submittal of the levy of the Special Tax to the Qualified Electors by: Nunez;
2nd by: Morris
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
Motion was made for approval of resolution calling a special election for the adoption of a Special Tax within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2) for certain types of services and facilities and submitting the Special Tax to the Qualified Electors of such CFD by: Nunez;
2nd by: Morris
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
Motion was made for approval of resolution declaring results of a special landowner election and directing the recording of a special tax lien within Community Facilities District No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2) by: Nunez;
2nd by: Morris
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
Motion was made for approval of introduction and first reading of an ordinance authorizing the levy of special taxes within Community Facilities District No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2). by: Nunez;
2nd by: Morris
Vote: 5-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Alindajao/Morris/Osorio
Nays: None

Absent: None
Abstentions: None

REGULAR AGENDA
13) Discussion and direction regarding Council Member Morris’ request for a letter of support regarding AB1708 (Solache) – HHAP Pathways for Cities Act and direct the Mayor to sign proposed letter of support
Council Member Morris provide the staff report – “Explain what the bill is? Okay. Thank you. Most cities in California belong to the California League of Cities, which is called Cal Cities now. And Cal Cities primarily fights legislative issues for cities, whether it's a bad thing for cities and we lobby against those bad laws that affect cities. It's a good law for cities and we lobby for them to lobby for good things that happen to cities. And so, all of us probably out of 400 and something cities that belong that are in the State of California belong to the California League of Cities. There is a letter of support that I feel that we really need to support legislatively, and that letter has to do with HHAP Pathways for Cities Act. And I would really like us to sponsor this letter and have the signatures or support of the board. And basically, I just want to read you a little bit about what the act is. Since 2019, the State's Flagship Homelessness Grant Program, the Homeless Housing Assistance, and that's what stands the HHAP… Grant Program has provided direct funding to cities with populations over 3,000. All 58 counties and the 44 continuums of care across California. AB 1708 would create a new opportunity for the other 469 California cities with populations under 300,000 that meet clear accountability requirements to apply for HHAP funding through their COCs. Currently, the HHAP applicants must submit originally coordinated action plans to the Department of Housing and Community Development, identifying each jurisdiction's roles and responsibilities in addressing the homelessness. While cities with populations under 300,000 people may participate in these plans, direct recipients are encouraged but not required to allocate HHAP funding to those cities. As a result, there is no requirement to meaningfully engage or allocate these critical resources to small and medium-sized cities. Many of these cities lack a clear and consistent pathway to access HHAP funding even as they invest significant general fund resources to prevent and reduce homelessness in their communities. I'm sure as a state, we are all required to pay a certain tax to help that fund, but most of that money is going to larger cities and it's not really allocated to smaller cities.

And this gives the opportunities to small cities and mid-sized cities to apply for monies for that grant. And so, with that, I would like to ask for the support of the council so that we and not only we, but other cities who are our size or smaller or bigger, medium-sized can apply for these funds and be considered. And not because we don't have 300,000 people that live in our city, but that makes us eligible to apply for those funds.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz opened public comment.

Guadalupe Martinez – “Lupe Martinez. Certainly, I mean, anything that we can do for housing, for the rents, for the homeless. I am in support. However, I did have a couple of questions. How is this money going to be directed? And do we have ... I know some time ago we had planned on doing something for the homeless on Fremont Street. I knew that there was a lot that had been bought there. Where are we at? And that's been, I don't know how many years now, so I'm not sure where things are at. And would this monies be used to finish that up or to start something new? Or how does that work?” Council Member Morris – “Actually the money, there does have to be a project we have to submit because we have to have some kind of accountability. This just allows us to apply for those funds or grant. So we don't know exactly. I guess the city would decide that as to where the monies could be spent or where it's needed. And I would think if Maribel can tell us what the fund, what happened...” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Well, sorry to interrupt, but I think it'll be best practice if we wait till every comment is done, and then afterwards we can have staff or Councilwoman Morris respond. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Martinez.”
Pastor David Vivas – “Good evening, Mayor and Council members. Pastor David Vivas. I understand that AB 1708 is going to provide $500 million and cities with a population under 300,000 will be able to apply for this grant. Are you aware that according to state auditors, that since 2019, there has been approximately 24 to $37 billion that have been given towards homelessness programs and projects. And in that time, homelessness has increased by 30,000 in the State of California. So, they're wondering about the effectiveness. Obviously, it hasn't been effective because it's increased. I'm for helping the homeless population. And if this is approved, of course, I'd like the City of Delano to apply for the grant. I know that this is only just to get a letter from the City of Delano saying, "Hey, we support this bill." And I know that's what this item is about, but I just thought I'd put a little bit of facts out here. A state auditor received the California Interagency Council on Homelessness did not consistently track or evaluate the effectiveness of state programs with data often three years old. And so according to the state auditors, due to a lack of data and accountability of how these funds were used, again, over $24 billion, they are advising delaying future funding until agencies can prove the effectiveness of these programs to assist the homeless population. So that is a concern. And they actually did bring up this particular item. They did bring this up. So, their state auditors are saying before you can move forward with more funding, why isn't the previous funding for the last five, six years, why hasn't it worked and why has homelessness increased by 30,000? Thank you.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz closed public comment.

Council Member Morris – “Yeah, primarily we don't know exactly where the funding is going to go. We have to apply for it, first of all, and we have to have a project in order to apply for the money, but that gives an opportunity legislatively, it's going to before Congress and going before the governor to approve it or not approve it. And we don't know at this point whether it's going to be approved or not approved.

That's depending on the support that we all give to this program or this grant program. But in order to even get started, I guess we have to get the bill there in order to pass it so that we can figure out just what projects need to be done for cities and to allow cities to apply for that grant money. So that's kind of where we are at this point. And so, we're just asking for a letter of support to say, yes, allow small cities and medium-sized cities to apply for these grants rather than all the money goes through cities that have over 300,000 people. And so that's the point.”
Council Member Osorio – “Yeah, thanks. Well, first of all, thank you, Council Member Morris, for continuing to be involved in Cal Cities and giving us updates following your meetings. I think this is a piece of legislation that would help Delano based on a quote that I see that says, "The City of Delano would benefit from additional state homeless funding by working with regional partners in Kern County.

The funding would expand homeless services and resources such as behavioral health services to provide clinical care directly to encampments." And so just based on last year's, we had one meeting where last year's meeting, we had a partner wanting funds from the city, and if this prospective grant opportunity opens up to our community, I think it only benefits us. So I would be in support. Thank you.” Council Member Alindajao – “Thank you, Mayor. It's been my policy as a council member being elected since 2018 not to, I guess, be in support of letters and support. I made it a policy only because part of the reason is that a lot of times these assembly bills take a change or an iteration from the time it's proposed to the time it's actually passed. I'm not making a judgment on the merits of AB 1708 or its benefit to the city. I think even in the absence of a letter of recommendation or support, the city would still be qualified to apply for those funds, but for those reasons, I will not be voting against or for it. Thank you.” Mayor Pro Tem Nunez – “I will be voting in support of it. This doesn't just cover homelessness. People walking in our streets as a homeless. This actually helps some residents who are struggling financially or no longer have a house and they're living with their sisters or cousins. Or in Delano, we have a lot of families that do attend our school district and they're considered homeless because they're living in somebody's garage or living in somebody's trailer. So this kind of funding would also help stuff like that too, potentially. I don't know the facts or the specifics behind how the funding will be available in the event that this does pass, but if it is available and we can apply for it, there's also what I understand, we can even use it, some of it for some affordable housing, so it’s a plus.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Thank you. I don't have any questions. I think I'm pretty familiar with support letters. I think it is a common practice of elected representatives to sign on to letters if they find that it'll fit their community. And so I think that this reading it, I think it fits our community in terms of do we want a piece of the pie or not? And I do want a piece of the pie for our community, and so I absolutely will support it.”
Motion was made for approval by: Morris;
2nd by: Osorio
Vote: 4-1
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Nunez/Morris/Osorio
Nays: Alindajao

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
14) Results of Downtown Business Parking Enforcement Ballot Staff report provided by Economic Development Specialist Fernandez.

Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Good evening, honorable mayor and members of the city council. My name's Miguel Fernandez and I work in the economic development department. And at the January 20th city council meeting, council directed staff to prepare and distribute ballots to downtown business owners to obtain input regarding the enforcement of the two-hour parking ordinance and overall parking availability in the downtown area. 93 ballots were mailed out and a total of 27 ballots were returned. Of those responses, 15 supported the two-hour parking enforcement policy and 12 opposed it. Regarding parking availability in the downtown Main Street area, 11 indicated there is enough parking and 16 indicated there is not enough. Staff is presenting the results tonight for council's discussion and direction. For question number one, 15 supported and 12 opposed. And for question number two, 11 indicated there's enough parking and 16 indicated there is not enough.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “The staff report states that there was a total of 16 for question number one?” Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Correct. I double checked before we came into the meeting and we did receive 27, so that was a typo on our end, so it was 15, not 16.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. Okay. We will correct that for the record. Thank you. Okay. With that, we will open it up to public comment. Is there anyone in the audience who has a comment on this particular item? Go ahead and please come up and state your name and address for the record.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz opened public comment.

Maria Garcia (via interpreter) – “Good afternoon,Everybody. My name is Maria Garcia. I'm a Delano resident. I am here for my business. I'm just asking if it's not for the two hours incomplete time for the businesses who are making this petition, maybe to allow a little bit more time. For us to be allowed a little bit more time for all of our customers. That's it.” Council Member Alindajao – “What type of business.?”
Maria Garcia (via interpreter beauty) – “It’s a beauty salón.” Yoita – “Thank you for the opportunity. My name is Yoita and I am the owner of Simple Advantage Insurance Services right up the street on 11th Avenue. My concern, I have a couple different concerns and these are not in order of importance, but when the city went down Main Street asking for whether we approve it or deny it or forward or not for it, my concern is that we only hit Main Street. We didn't hit the side streets between 9th and 11th, but yet we're ticketing all side streets. I'm assuming between High and maybe Jefferson or Lexington. I'm not quite sure how far it goes into East and West. So, we in front of our office are getting ticketed or have gotten ticketed. Obviously, it's been stopped now until whether it passes or doesn't pass. So, my concern is we need to take those businesses into consideration as well. We didn't get an opportunity to vote. By not being able the opportunity to vote, you're missing a lot of businesses and a lot of other opinions. When I looked at the news, when I looked at social media, none of it was even mentioned on those side streets, and we only mentioned High Street. So, I think we need to reconsider that. Number two, when we were getting ticketed, the last time, it was I think the week before prior to this other city council meeting, we were told that at that time was lady and officer. She took photos of our vehicles parked and then came back two hours later. And if a vehicle was still parked in the same spot, she gave a ticket. But that is not a correct way of marking a vehicle because we, specifically in my office, we've got three of us that work there. We are in and out of the office anywhere from two to four times a day. We're open from 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM. So, would there be times that we're there more than two hours? Possible, but we almost in that particular block, because we have Penelope's salon, we have Farmer's Insurance across the street, we've got right next to the alley, we've got, I guess, a little section that has two or three units of other businesses that has a parking spot or parking lot. So, we kind of have an unknown parking spot for us that have businesses there. So, we leave, come back to the same spot. If it's not marked, the person can't say or the officer can't say whether they can mark it or not, whether they can give us a ticket. The other thing is that on timeframe is my concern is the safety. In the winter when we have, it's dark, the safety of going to the parking lots for the people that are working after dark. And again, I just think that we need to take in consideration from 9th through 11th or any other streets on side streets on the businesses and make sure that when we are going to be ticketing, make sure that the vehicles are marked to show that yes, they have moved or they have not moved because having somebody drive by with photos isn't going to make show that whether it's marked or not. Thank you.” Council Member Osorio – “As we wait for the next person, can we get clarification that that is accurate whether only folks on Main Street were surveyed?”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “We can go ahead after everyone goes. We can go ahead and staff respond.” Maria Martinez – “Okay. I'm here again. The parking lot, is they going to give tickets? There's people that are handicapped and they park there. Are they going to get tickets if they take more than two hours? Because handicap people take their time. So that's my question. The other one is I see a lot of traffic on where was JCPenny, that was the gym. And they park in the bank and they park the side. What do you think that business? Later they're going to put no parking. Where are they going to park? So that's a trouble too. So they're going to get a lot of tickets because they're going to stay there for a long time. I mean, I can't accept that, but it's just to you guys.”
Eunice Romero – “Hi, my name's Eunice Romero and I live here in Delano. I've lived here all my life and seen Main Street and this area change over and over from two way, one way. And the majority of the businesses now are businesses that are time-consuming. You have a lot of beauty salons there. And as time has changed, has the city ever thought of other types of parking structures or anything to accommodate? Or is that the city's responsibility to accommodate downtown the parking area, parking meters? I don't know if that was a thought. Just something because it's changing. Our little town is changing and it's growing. And even though things are growing outside of Main Street, like I said, there's time-consuming businesses here that maybe shouldn't pay the price for taking the opportunity to open a business here in Delano. I think it's kind of one of those deals where you want people to stay here and run a business in Delano, but yet you have these little things that are like, well, maybe if I open my business in another town or somewhere else that won't cause my customers extra headaches or whatever. I don't know. It's just something that I just was thinking about, just the growth and stuff. And if there's available spaces to make maybe open parking and share with the citizens that, "Hey, there's parking over here.

Maybe a little walk won't hurt to get down to walk a little ways." Or even having the businesses park, I know there's parking maybe behind the business or somewhere other than downtown because I know Wells Fargo, some of their employees park right in front. It's kind of like when you go to Vallarta, you see all the employees taking up all the front parking. So, it's just one of those deals where just maybe sharing with companies too to have their employees maybe park and give space to their customers. Thank you for letting me share.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz closed public comment.

Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Yes, Mayor. I believe it was just clarification on where the ballots were distributed. So we went, it was on Main Street from 9th through 14th, so that's 902 Main Street. I believe we started in Goodwill and we went all the way up to Snowfun, which is 1329. That's where the ballots were distributed to, all 93.”
Council Member Morris – “But you didn't go down the side streets, right?” Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Correct. That's correct. We did not go down the side streets.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Are we ticketing the side streets, just for clarification?” Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Currently, I believe we're not, but we ...” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “We were initially?”
Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “I believe so, yes. They were because…” Mayor Pro Tem Nunez – “Those areas are signed.”
Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “They're all two hour parking, I believe, signed.” Mayor Pro Tem Nunez – “Okay. Main Street, Jefferson and all the side streets do have the signs and they were being ticketed during that time. The signs are up.” Council Member Morris – “Okay. Wouldn't we have voice? Should we have a wood?” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “So I guess for clarification, this will only affect what you just stated, the area that you just stated. Would it not affect the side ones?”
Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “Correct. This is just for me…” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “For council to decide. Okay. That's for council to decide. Okay. Thank you, sir.

Economic Development Specialist Fernandez – “You're welcome.” Council Member Morris – “Because I don't really ... For me, because I don't have a business down there downtown, it doesn't really matter to me whether they do the two-hour parking or if the employees want to park their car out there. It all depends on the business out there. Do they want their customers to park out there or do you want their employees to park out there? What's it going to be? I mean, if they're more concerned about their employees because they don't want them to park behind the store or possibly the parking lot behind it, because we do have parking behind the alleys on the other side of the structure. So, there's one by the library, there's one over there by Chase Bank. There's one over there by, let's see, by the fire department. There's one over there by ... There's several downtown that all I have to do is cross the alley to get to the other side. And I know some people say, "Well, when it gets dark." But I think those are kind of accommodations you have to make with people where you work when you all leave work and say, ‘Hey, well, let me walk you out to the car or let me make sure you get there safely,’ or however you're concerned, but what's it going to be? I mean, you want your customers to park or you want your employees to park. To me, it's up to the business owners what they want. So, I'm just looking at these numbers here and I'm looking at the majority of the people saying they're in favor of implementing it to our parking out there. But now I'm thinking maybe we should send out a ballot to those on the side streets. We have been ticketing there and it does have a sign somewhere to get their input into what's going to happen with their parking out there. So that's where I stand out there. And I think to our parking is plenty of time to conduct your business or whatever you're going to conduct downtown. I know the beauty salons may have a little problem sometimes, but you may have to run out there and just move your car to the next spot over or whatever it takes to get that three-hour parking, if that's what you want. So whatever the business owners want, I'm good with what they vote on or what they want.” Council Member Osorio – “Yeah, thanks. So, I appreciate, first of all, the efforts that staff went into put into this survey. I think it gives us a picture of where folks are at. I think for me though, if we are making a decision this evening, I still am hesitant about moving forward with investment just because of the concerns raised at the last meeting regarding the state in which some alleys are in or in that's referring to lighting, the concern of older residents walking to the city's public spaces or public parking spaces, the fact that one or two residents at that meeting, we last discussed this item that it was women primarily concerned about the safety walking from the city's parking spaces to their local business. And so, without, I think, us doing more efforts into investing to address these issues, I am reserved about voting moving forward with a two-hour limit. But if we want to consider adding more time to that, I would be in support.”
Council Member Alindajao – “I had a question for the chief. If you can answer this, Chief. In terms of enforcement, parking enforcement, there was an issue brought up by, I believe, Ms. Yoita regarding photographing of vehicles. I mean, back in the old days, they'd come by with the white chalk and mark the tires. I don't know if it's done anymore, but is that the proper method of enforcement for parking violations?”
Chief of Police Nicholson – “The method in which the community service officer would mark the tires with chalk or take photographs.”
Council Member Alindajao – “I see. So either one of those would work?” Chief of Police Nicholson – “Either one of those. As long as they could testify accurately that the vehicle was not moved.”
Council Member Alindajao – “Very well. Thank you, Chief.” Chief of Police Nicholson – “You're welcome.”
Council Member Alindajao – “Well, I think the issue I think before the city council is the traffic conditions, traffic and parking conditions in downtown Delano having a significant or material impact on businesses downtown. I think that's the question that's before the council. Now, in terms of safety, safety of the residents downtown and whatnot, I think that's a different issue and I think we're conflating those issues into one. But the issue is, is there an issue with parking and traffic downtown? And I think based on the reports and reports from staff, and of course, our own experiences with downtown over the years, I think the answer is yes. So what is the solution? The solution isn't to give the general consensus an opportunity to say, to tell the city or the police department how to enforce the law. I think all of us here on the council swore to uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the United States and local laws.

And the current local law, correct me if I'm wrong, is a two-hour parking limit, correct? So I'm not sure under any other circumstance or any other part of the punishing code where we would gather a bunch of surveys and information and everybody decides, well, we don't want that law enforcement. We're not going to enforce that law. I think the laws that are on the book are for a specific purpose. It's to help control traffic parking in the downtown area, and that's what we should continue to do. And that's the issue. And I think the two-hour parking limitation addresses that issue. Now, I think one of the business owners brought up a good point in terms of salons. Can they get an extension of time being that sometimes patrons to those types of businesses, they're there two, three, four, perhaps five hours, depending on what the services are. Perhaps an extension in those types of businesses makes sense. But to say we're not going to enforce the law because a majority of people say we shouldn't, is not the way it works. The laws are on the book for a purpose, and I think it helps to control traffic and park in the downtown area, and we should continue to enforce the law in order to help businesses. I understand that to an individual in the downtown area, perhaps I could see that as an inconvenience, I'm getting ticketed, I didn't move my car, et cetera, et cetera. But those kind of considerations are not for the police department or the government to take into consideration. It is the overall goal of trying to help traffic and parking in the downtown area. And that's been a problem since I was a kid and I grew up here in this town all my life. I think the downtown area is losing a lot of business. I think the downtown area is losing a lot of business because people are simply not willing to wait and to go elsewhere when there's no parking. And I think that's the bottom line, and that's the issue we're trying to address. Now, the current solution is a two-hour parking limit for everyone. Now, might there be nuances in that law to change and to make better so that we can keep the flow of traffic and parking in the downtown area going? Absolutely, let's do it. But I think we have the cart before the horse. And I think to say, "Hey, if everybody doesn't think we should enforce that, then we shouldn't." Well, what if a hundred people come in here and say, "Hey, you know what? I don't think we should enforce the speeding laws in the city. What do we do then? Do we give them the same deference?" No, I don't think so. So, we got to administer the law, the local law in an equitable way, and I don't think treating downtown any different than we would any other law is the solution. So, I'm in favor of continuing to enforce the two-hour parking lot. And of course, if there are changes that we need to make that make sense to make traffic and parking in downtown area better, then let's do it. But I think a lot of businesses are suffering in downtown from a lack of business or patrons coming to their business to do business because of the parking situation. And I don't think anyone on this council, I think, denies that. I think we all agree that there's a parking and traffic situation in downtown Delano but not enforcing the law on at least the two-hour limit, because that's all we have to address that issue in downtown is the answer.”
Mayor Pro Tem Nunez – “Myself and Councilwoman Liz, we actually walked the streets when we first ...

This item came up a couple months ago, and we also did a survey. We did cover the side streets. We didn't get to finish all the side streets, but we got a good percentage of the streets, and there was a high number of businesses that were requesting. I guesstimate we were between 75 and 80% of the businesses owners were asking us that they did want the enforcement because they were losing business with cars going around the block and they weren't able to get customers into their stores. Somebody brought up a question regarding the handicap parking in the handicap area. California state law does not allow police departments to cite a handicap vehicle that is properly marked that they placard. And as long as they're in a property spot, you cannot cite that vehicle for that reason. Even if it's not a handicapped parking spot, they won't cite for it. And if they do cite for it, it's an incorrect cite. I'm also in favor of keeping it at the two hours. I don't see any difference. We're no difference in ... We want to compare our city to Los Angeles and we want to compare our cities to Fresnos and Bakersfields. They also have the two-hour parking. They've had it in the books for years. Delano rewrote it and updated it back in 2008. I was one of the officers that was assigned to that area to go enforce it with this issue happening back in 2008. And with the economy tanking later on in those years, there were cutbacks within the city. People were moved around. It stopped being enforced and it just never came back. And the problem never went away. We had the problem. I know we have talked about potentially side roads not on Main Street that aren't parking issues. If we don't enforce on the side roads, you will be having an issue very quick because people will no longer be parking on Main Street who have to work in the area. They're going to be parking on the side streets, and they're going to be leaving their car in front of your business for six, seven, eight hours.

And then people are going to come back to us and say, "Hey, this is an issue." And you start enforcing on that area. But I also agree with Councilman Alindajao how that this ordinance is in the books at two hours, and I think we should leave it at two hours. If we go to the four hours or change it anything else, people predominantly work eight-hour days. You go in for four hours, take your lunch break, you move your car, come back, park four more hours, and we did not solve the issue that likewise, with somebody working a 10-hour shift, they go in, they're four hours, leave for an hour, park in a different spot they got four hours, and when they get their late break, they come back and put their car back. So my vote was to be leave it have we currently have it.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. So now my comment, I think for those of you who of course are here and have no clue of why are we even discussing this, here's some historical analysis on this. We as the city didn't enforce this policy for a certain amount of time. And when we started to enforce this policy, of course, we got concerns from local businesses downtown, and that is why it is brought forward to council for us to confirm it, to leave it as it is, to enforce it, to not enforce it, to implement different hours, you name it. And so we decided to do this survey to get the input of the business owners of that area, and that this was the results that we received. But I think that it's important to, I think, take into consideration our hair salons who do, as much as my council colleagues walked down Main Street, I also too walked downtown Main Street, and I also asked in particular our hair salons, what would they like to see? How would it impact them? And we have a lot of hair salons downtown Main Street. And so, I think it's important for us when we look at this issue to at least maybe come into the middle. I do think it's our role to decide to change the hours. I think even before I even brought up the idea of parking meters just to, I don't know, to make it more efficient, but I would go ahead and be in agreement with three hours. I think three hours is meeting someone in the middle, and then we can always revisit policies at a later time. And so, I think three hours would suffice to try it out. And I think that that would be some sort of middle ground with our hair salons and with folks who do want it for the two-hour limit. And at the end of the day, I also agree that I think we need to put our businesses first and in terms of customers and making sure that our ... And I've said it before, I've driven down Main Street as well, and I have had difficulty in parking. I've been circling around three, four, five times and I couldn't find parking. And so it is an issue.

So let's not say it's not. It is an issue. I will say as well, and this is just me speaking, I think that it might be beneficial if we change one block. So instead of the proposed area, which is ninth to 14th, I'm going to propose nine to 13th to my colleagues. I don't know if that's something that is feasible, and here's my reasoning for it. When you look at the congestion down Main Street, I at least personally feel like it's in that area. And so I don't think when you go past Vallarta, when you go past ... Or not Vallarta. When you go past the Immortals Gym, I don't see it being that much of an issue that way, but of course that's based on what I've seen. And so if others feel differently, so be it. And so I'm going to propose that, but I also do see Vice Mayor Nunez's point in regards to, hey, if we limit it here, folks are going to start parking on the sides. And so we want folks to also utilize our city parking lots. I know they might be a little far, but let's encourage some walking a little bit. And I know that there was also some concerns about safety, and I will say that we have implemented or will implement more lighting downtown Main Street, and not just lighting as a light bulb, it's going to be a little pretty too. So, you'll stay tuned for that. And hopefully that addresses a little bit of the public safety component. But that's what I propose tonight if folks are okay with three hours and to limit that area.”
Council Member Alindajao – “I guess for Mark. Mark, is this an actionable item 14 or is this just for discussion or…”
City Attorney Hensley – “It's for discussion and direction. And so on where the council lands, there may be additional action. For example, if you want to move to three-hour parking, then we'll probably have to bring back the city's code and resolutions about changing that and there has to be some change in signage and those kind of things.”
Council Member Alindajao – “And where do we stand as far as the moratorium? Is it still currently in effect or has that been lifted?”
City Attorney Hensley – “My understanding was lifted, but ...” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Up until today.”
Council Member Alindajao- “Okay. Very well.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. Any other comments from my council? Okay. So I'm going to motion to bring back to change the codes to parking for three-hour limit and limit it to ninth to 13th.” Council Member Alindajao – “And may I, if I can give my…” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “You can amend. Yeah, absolutely. Please provide your input.” Council Member Alindajao – “I think also exploring the idea of the possibility that keep it at two hours and just make exceptions for certain types of businesses like beauty salons more specifically, that would be my suggestion in terms of an overall change to the ordinance. I don't think the number of hours, extending the number of hours is going to help the situation or solve it may make it worse. I don't know.

But currently, I think the two-hour parking limit is, I think for now is working, however, with the nuances of changing it for certain types of business, that'd be my input.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz - “Okay. Thank you. Staff have any questions or comment on that?” City Attorney Hensley – “I'd like to hear the council if you come to a majority of direction and we may need to talk among staff about how we would ... For example, if we're going to give certain kind of businesses more time to park, how would we actually implement that? But I'm not saying we can't. I would just majority says we'd like to see this as a list and let the staff go back and digest that and figure out is there a way to do that.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. Thank you, Mark. So there's a motion on the floor. Do we have a second?” City Clerk Chavez – “I'm sorry, what exactly is going to be the motion?” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Yes. So, the motion that I provided was to do a three-hour limit instead of the two hours and to incorporate to change it from 9th to 13th.” City Clerk Chavez – “Is that the extent of the motion?” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “That is my motion.”
Council Member Osorio – “Just to clarify, were you asking to include an amendment in that discussion?” Council Member Alindajao – “We're not cementing ... This question's remarked, just for the record, we're not cementing an ordinance at this moment, right? I mean, it's up for debate and discussion and amendments at a future date, correct?”
City Attorney Hensley – “Correct. We have an ordinance that's going to go back in fact tomorrow apparently. And so this is a matter of what does the council want to see happen in the future and like to hear a majority. If a majority of you can come to a recommendation, then staff will take that and work on implementing it.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “I will say as well, so after today, then the two-hour limit will continue until this comes back again to council.”
Motion was made to bring back to change the codes to parking for three-hour limit and limit it to ninth to 13th by: Solorio-Ruiz;
2nd by: Alindajao
Vote: 3-2
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Alindajao/Osorio
Nays: Nunez/Morris

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
15) Discussion and direction regarding Mayor Solorio-Ruiz’s the ‘Community First’ Ordinance to restrict U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from entering public buildings
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. So first, I would like to thank the City Manager and our City Attorney for the many conversations that I've had with them on this matter and for being responsive throughout the process. I also want to thank community members who took the time to speak with me at length. Pastor Vivas, thank you for the conversations in regards to this item and the issues that you have and others had.

And it's important to make sure that we hear out our community, but also to those who have called in support. There are a number of reasons that I decided to bring this item forward tonight. Let me begin with this, that I love this country and I believe in this country and its ideals. I believe, and I've said it countless times, I believe that we are living through a moment that demands courage from those entrusted with public office. It is a moment that requires us to have difficult conversations about what our responsibilities are as local leaders, a moment in time in which our fundamental principles and ideals as Americans are under attack. A moment in time that requires political courage amongst political instability. Across this country, we have witnessed Latinos being hunted in the streets of America, American citizens murdered for practicing their constitutional right to protest. There must be internal lines that we do not cross as Americans. Too many people feel that the very institutions that are meant to protect their rights and uphold the law are instead being used in ways that create terror. And when that happens, local leaders cannot simply look away and say that there is nothing we can do, because there is something we can do. We can decide what values will guide and govern the use of our city property. We can decide how resources will be used. We can decide whether our residents will feel that local government belongs to them or whether it will become another source of fear in this time of turmoil. That is what ‘Community First’ ordinance is all about. This policy is about drawing clear lines. It is about saying that city spaces should serve the public not be used in ways that undermine trust and dignity. It is about making clear that our city government will act consistently with constitutional principles and with the values of the community. It is about local control. This policy creates a clear administrative process if an immigration authority is using property without a valid judicial warrant or court order. Per the ordinance, in that situation, the City Manager or designee must make a lawful request that the unauthorized use immediately seize, document that request, and any refusal as thoroughly as circumstances allow, notify all relevant city departments and inform the Delano community through reasonable means of communication. In other words, this ordinance is about accountability, documentation, and making sure the city responds lawfully and in an organized manner when its property is used without authorization. It says that if the federal government wants to act, it must do so lawfully, transparently and without turning our local city, own spaces into places of fear. And let me be clear as well on what this policy does not do, because that's important. It does not block federal agents from enforcing federal law. It does not authorize anyone to interfere with federal operations. It does not create conflict for the sake of conflict. Years from now, our children, our grandchildren will ask us, "Where were we in this moment in time of history? What did we do? What did we say?" I want to be able to say that when our community needed leadership, we gave it. At the end of the day, this is about trust, dignity, and reminding people that this city is theirs and that this country belongs to you. It belongs to we the people. Let me also address three questions directly because I know that potentially they will come up or these are concerns that I've heard from community members. First, if California already has SB 54, why do we need this policy? SB54 primarily sets the rules for how state and local law enforcement may engage in immigration enforcement activity. Our job as a city is to make clear how our own city property will be governed here in Delano. In fact, California law actually expressly recognizes that cooperation must also comply with local law and local policy. So, this ordinance is not redundant. It is our city doing its job to give local clarity, accountability, and direction to our employees and to our staff. If we leave any point vague, then we leave our employees without clear guidance and our community without clear assurance. What about the supremacy clause? The supremacy clause means federal law is supreme when there is a true conflict, but that does not mean that the federal government gets to command city government to use local staff, local resources, or local property to carry out federal civil immigration enforcement. The Supreme Court has made that clear that the federal government cannot command state and local governments into carrying out federal regulatory programs, and the Ninth Circuit upheld major parts of California's SB54 framework, recognizing that decline to use state or local resources to assist federal immigration enforcement is different from obstructing federal law. So, the question is not whether the federal government can enforce federal law. It can. The question is whether Delano must volunteer its own local machinery for that purpose, and the answer, in my opinion, is no. And to those who say that this violates the supremacy clause, I would say that there's a difference between obstructing federal law and declining to turn local government into the arm of federal civil immigration enforcement, and this ordinance respects that difference. And lastly, federal funding. I acknowledge the concerns, the fears, the aspirations that everyone has. There is no doubt about it that I do not see those concerns. I want to try to lower the temperature on the concern about federal funding. I have not seen proof of a city automatically losing all federal funds simply because it adopts a policy like this. This law is more limited than that.

Courts have actually rejected broad efforts to cut off funding across the board, and any dispute would have to be tied to a specific grant or actual legal authority. So, I do not think it is responsible to tell our community that Delano will lose federal funding simply because of this policy that is not established or supported based on facts that I'm aware of. Of course, based on threats and fears from the federal government, of course, we have heard them. And of course that has happened in terms of our state, but of course we know who our governor is. The truth is no one can guarantee what the federal government would choose to do. What this ordinance does is decide how Delano's own property and local resources will be used. That is our responsibility as a city. And respectfully, fear of being noticed cannot be the standard for which we govern. If we let fear decide our politics, then we no longer are leading, we are reacting. Before I open it up to public comment, I just want to ask and say that please let's engage in this discussion in a way with respect, in a way with thoughtfulness, and with right intentions, even if there may be disagreements. Other than that, I believe we could open it up to public comment unless Mark, you have anything to say. Okay. We will open it up to public comment. Is there anyone who has a public comment on this matter?”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz opened public comment.

Anthony Cortez – “Good evening, Mayor City Council. Anthony Cortez, Shell Beach Court, Delano. I am speaking directly to you, Mayor, as a resident of this community to express my serious concern and disappointment regarding your recent statements and proposals about restricting federal agents from using city owned property. The State of California already has laws in place that limit cooperation between local agencies and federal immigration enforcement. Because of this, it is difficult for many residents, including myself, to understand why additional measures are being pursued at the city level when the state law already addresses these issues. From my perspective as a resident, it creates the appearance that this issue is being used to advance political ambitions rather to address the everyday needs of the people who live in this city. The mayor of a small community like ours should focus on the real problems affecting residents every day, public safety, infrastructure, roads, local services, and the stability of our neighborhoods. I am also troubled by statements suggesting that the Hispanic community is being hunted down. In my opinion, rhetoric like this is irresponsible because it spreads fear among people who are already living in uncertainty. Words from a public official carry weight and statements like that can create panic in a community that already faces many, many challenges. Our city is a small agriculture town where many residents work long hours in the fields and contribute to the local economy every day. These are our neighbors, my neighbors. Whether they are documented or undocumented, most are simply trying to work, support their families, and live peacefully. My biggest concern is that publicly escalating this issue, you may be actually doing the opposite of what you intend. Bringing national political controversy into a small community risks drawing increased federal attention to our city. When local leaders publicly challenge federal authorities, it can lead to more scrutiny and potentially more federal presence in the very community you claim to be protecting. Leadership requires judgment and responsibility. The role of a mayor is not to bring national political battles into a small agricultural town like ours, but to focus on governing responsibly and keeping the community safe, stable, and united. I ask you to seriously reconsider this direction and remember that your words and actions carry consequences for every person who lives in this community. You sit in the mayor's seat now. Is it all about power and control. Be careful with that. I personally haven't seen any federal agents in our community. That's not to say that they haven't been here, but if I see them in my every day-to-day business, I would think that it's because of what you brought. Respectfully.”
Louis Gillum – “Good evening, Honorable Mayor Solorio-Ruiz and esteemed members of the city council. My name is Louis Gillum. I'm a legal observer with Faith in the Valley's Valley Watch Network, and I'm here tonight to speak with sincere and heartfelt support for the Community First Ordinance. As rapid responders who verify and document reports of ICE and CBP activity in eight Central Valley counties, we see how ICE and CPB's presence, or even the rumor of their presence, has undermined trust in local law enforcement. The ordinance addresses this mistrust by mandating a valid judicial warrant for any immigration activity from staging through surveillance to detention on city property. As accompaniments to our fellow community members, to immigration check-ins, court appearances, and even medical appointments where they feel unsafe, we see how ICE and CBP's presence or even the rumor of their presence impedes access to public health and legal rights and government services. The ordinance addresses this barrier by assuring the community that city property is safe property, that is truly the property of the people. And as accompaniments, for those who have won their freedom through hard-fought habeas cases after having been detained, we see and hear their stories about the brutal effects that ICE detention has had on their health, the preventable spread of infectious disease, lack of access to medical care, unhealthy weight loss from inadequate substandard food, and as the ordinance points out, these are public safety issues. And tragically, Kern County is home to three of California's ICE prisons. But the passage of this ordinance tonight, I hope it will be tonight, is a step toward assuring the community that Delano stands strong. A vote to pass the Community First Ordinance is a vote for public safety, for public health for human decency and human rights. It will send a message that people power is stronger than profit power. Passing this ordinance tonight will stand as yet another milestone in the history of Delano's long and proud history of lighting the torch of justice. And once that torture is lit, it will be passed from city to city until all cities stand up and say, ‘Enough.’ Thank you.” Rosa Lopez – “Good evening. My name is Rosa Lopez and I'm a long-term resident of Kern County and a community advocate throughout the county. I'm an active volunteer with Rapid Response Network and have responded to numerous attacks against our members of the community throughout the county. And I'm here because I commend your bold leadership, Mayor Solorio, by prioritizing the safety and the wellbeing of the Lenoir residents. And I express my support for the Community First Ordinance. This ordinance is about public safety. It's about community trust, and it's about putting community's needs first. And it's ensuring that every resident that calls Delano home feels safe when accessing city services and reporting crimes. The Community First Ordinance will use that the services in Delano are prioritized for Delano residents and not to aid in immigration enforcement because what is happening across the nation where no one is making it up and we shouldn't wait until it comes to our doors to do something.

And so this is a proactive approach to steps to take to what are we doing? And like Mayor Solorio have said, there are state laws and the landlord itself back in 2019 passed a resolution, but this ordinance goes a little further. And I commend Council Member Joe when he said that we are about enforcing the law, and that is simply what this ordinance will do. Make sure that any federal agency wanted to conduct enforcement, they follow the law. They have a judicial warrant and they are doing it by the books, and that is not what we're seeing across the country. And for that reason, we want to provide information about the false narratives, about false information being shared online and in community, saying that this ordinance risks federal grants, which again, Mayor Solorio have pointed out, there is no record of that or that we are hindering on federal enforcement. Again, this does not prevent law of federal agents from enforcing the law. Again, as long as they're doing it lawfully. The fact is that there are no clear examples that other cities have lost funding because of their sanctuary status. And the court has ruled that federal government cannot withhold funding from cities just because they're a sanctuary city. And so therefore, I support this ordinance and I hope that you see through the misinformation and the false narratives put out there to clearly represent a standup for the landlord residents as you've been doing and saying and carefully acknowledging that you're here to enforce law, not to overstep it. And this ordinance does not do that. Thank you.”
Abigail Rodella – “My name's Abigail Rodella. I am a public health and immigration organizer with Faith in the Valley. Faith in the Valley is a faith-based grassroots organization of leaders and volunteers from diverse faiths and racial backgrounds. We're anchored in a prophetic call of resistance to unite everyday people through their shared struggles to build an alternative narrative. Our old narrative found upon our own stories. As a Mexican-American, I am not afraid to acknowledge the privilege that I and many others hold in this room. Many of us who have achieved an educational degree overcome language barriers or risen up the professional ladder, gain a privilege that can cause us to become alienated from the very source of pain that ICE enforcement and detention centers inflict upon our immigrant communities. That alienation can lead us to see immigrants as either social projects or discuss their issues from an empathetic, power over, hands-tied perspective. Yet, while we go about our daily lives, families, friends, allies, and entire communities are being deprived of their unalienable rights in place like animals into detention centers that profit from their suffering. As an organizer, I have witnessed young children and students cry in fear as they describe the nightmare of coming home from school to possibly finding their parents gone. Due to recent executive orders, many of these children are more at risk of becoming lost in the American foster system, which disproportionately represents children of color in the welfare system. Even children whose parents have legal status are now becoming fearful of losing loved ones to ICE enforce violence and retaliation simply because of their accent or skin color. I applaud the city council for proposing the Community First Ordinance, which affirms the Delano community's safety and sends a clear message that ICE enforced violence cannot be tolerated. As we continue to work together, not just to advocate, but to actively mobilize our communities, I urge you all to remember that this work does not end here. Hundreds of immigrants, including your own constituents, are currently being detained across Ascension facilities in Kern County and are being subjected to inhumane treatment, denied medical and mental healthcare deprived of quality food, and subjected to racial discrimination and sexual harassment in these facilities. Faith in the Valley is committed to working side by side with community members, government officials like you, the city council and mayor, who have demonstrated the vision to support our communities during these times. I want to publicly thank you for your actions, and I hope that this can serve as an example to other cities across our county in demonstrating that we as a city care about our constituents and we care about everyone. Thank you.” Nancy Oropeza – “Good evening. This is Nancy Oropesa. I'm a Delano resident, 2120 Poplar Avenue.

First of all, I want to say thank you to Mayor Solorio Reese for your initiative on bringing up this issue as a resident of Delano and as a neighbor of our immigrant community. Personally, I work alongside a lot of people directly with fund workers, but also with the Filipino community and with our Latin America community. So that's the reason I'm here because it grabbed my attention. As a community member, I think it's a great initiative to bring this to our town for the safety and just listening to pastive speakers. I think I'm learning about this initiative that you're bringing to our town and also as a mother, I want to make sure that my kids feel safe, that we don't get to be Los Angeles or we don't get to be attacked by this agents just violating the law and not doing their right job by bringing the judicial warrants of all their jobs. They're just attacking our community. So, I just want to make sure that my kids feel safe and also I want to feel safe. And I want to say to you all to please listen to our feelings, to our thoughts as the community members, and I'm expecting the support of you all. Thank you.” Eunice Romero – “Yeah. Just really quick. My name's Eunice. So, it's kind of like what pastor said. Why kick the Hornets Nest if nothing's being done? Community first, right? Why can't you use all this effort that everybody's talking about into protecting these people and not causing a ruckus? Because I've watched the news. The federal government's going to come in whether we like it or not. They're going to do what they want to do. They just deal with the consequences later. Why can't we just help them do ... I see these people living in crappy housing. These landlords take advantage of the fact that they can't seek help, that they can't reach out to get legal help, to get proper housing. They're living in these tiny houses where there's 10 of them. It's like, why can't the efforts be put into making situations livably [sic] better for them? I've seen that how the healthcare system, they don't have insurance, so they have to pay cash.

It's like a lot of them pay out of pocket. It's like, why can't we do something to help them? You said community first, right? Flood came in and asked for help. It was denied. Why can't those kind of things come in and why can't those things be supported? And instead of kicking the hornet's nest and just bringing a spotlight and causing problems for them unnecessarily. Thank you.” Sylvia Romano (via interpreter) – “My name is Sylvia Romano. I'm a Resident McFarland Delano. I'm a community organizer with Faith in the Valley. I am thankful for this space. We know these are hard conversations to have. In a community when 90% or more is an immigrant community. We who work directly with these communities, we're here representing them, to thank this initiative and to show or support, as well as the community we work for, and you can see behind yourselves. Communities whose voices need to be heard, moreover, communities who need parents who can work in their farmer work place, students who can feel safe in their schools, but the fact that you guys take this initiative with the city first, you're showing the responsibility you have as a local authority, but moreover, the compromise that you're showing or working on their behalf. Something they ask me to mention to you is important because their health and their mental health, with this immigration policies are extremely affected by.

Having this safe zones increases their hope and safety for their families.” Pastor David Vivas – “Good evening, council members. Pastor David Vivas. I read the proposed community first ordinance. I read the whole thing, and so I understand it to mean that ICE officers, which is a federal law enforcement agency, cannot use city-owned or controlled properties for their operations without permission from the city. So, in other words, if ICE needs to use a city-owned property for an investigation or operation, they must have a judicial warrant or court order from a federal, state, or local magistrate based on probable cause and legally sufficient to compel compliance by the city of Delano. So, they just can't come in and use whatever, again, city-owned property without the permission from the city.

Also, this does not bar or keep ICE agents from walking into a city council meeting. If there's a person sitting in the audience that is wanted, that is a fugitive, maybe that has committed a heinous crime, murder, this does not prevent them from coming if they have a warrant for their arrest. They can walk into, so this ordinance is basically saying that they can't do their operations using city property. So, here's another thing that I've noticed a few times in this proposed ordinance is that we want the city to feel safe. My question is, say from who? The drug dealers, the murderers? I'm an advocate for victims of crime. We have over 50 people that have been killed here in Delano going back to 1980, and we don't know who killed them. Many of those cases have gone cold and we don't know. But there are people that have entered into our nation that have committed heinous crimes. And I believe that all of us would want those people out of here because you know what? It's not a right to come into the United States of America. It's a privilege. Big difference. It's a privilege to come in here. And I believe that people have a right to come into America and to better their lives. If they come from a nation where they're suffering poverty and they just want to come and better themselves. So, I'm all for that. But what I don't want is individuals like this 22-year-old that was arrested back in February 11th, living out here west of Delano operating a meth lab. And law enforcement agents came in and arrested that young man who was from Sinaloa, Mexico. That's what he was identified as. He was on the run from Kerman and he came here to Delano. So, see, we don't want those kind of people in here. We want people who are going to respect our laws and respect our neighbor. First of all, respect our safety. Thank you.” Maria Martinez – “My name is Maria Martinez. I live 1215 Lexington Street here in Delano. You already know. What I was saying, we have to be respectful to the people who are coming to speak. Sometimes these people talking, they don't know what our people go through. I'm going to tell you my story just a little bit. I know what they feel because I was an immigration victim, because they thought that I didn't have documents. Every time I was going to Mexico, my parents will have to come and save me because they thought that I didn't have documents. I feel like I was dying because they mistreat you. What you’re doing? Okay, but who's going to be there protecting our people? Do you understand me? We have to protect our children. We have two granddaughters who were in an immigration center in Texas. They were suffering, giving the medicine they didn't need. Right now they're scared. Even that they're young ladies right now, they live six years with us, and they're still scared for everything that's happening. Also, I didn't want to mention this, but we also in this due to President. Everyone who voted for him, I hope that you're thinking about what you did, because this is due to the President of the United States. I know the federal law has existed forever, but the other presidents were good to us because when we came, we created the federal law. We broke the federal law, but the day came, the day came, where we got a president who's doing the contrary to all the other ones. And I hope that everybody who voted for him really thinks next time. Thank you.”
America Cepeda – “Good afternoon. I'm going to be brief because I know there's not enough time. I have lived around my work associates. I work in the fields. That's why I'm saying it. When they're having these famous raids, when people start saying they're here, they're over there. There some fortunate ones like me that I have a residence, but I work with a lot of people that don't have a residency. Working in the fields, they start looking around asking, "Where am I going to hide if they come by?" And I am sorry for my tears. But working in the fields is really hard. It's something very hard. Seeing the person next to you, seeing them sad, frustrated, working, looking around, in fear because someone say they're on the street, they might come by. The contractors can say, "Close the doors." Try to stop them from coming in. I have family. I have siblings, but my siblings are everybody, all the Hispanic people. I'm not just speaking of blood relatives. I'm speaking of human brothers. We're all siblings before God. I'm not speaking about religion, not talking about politics. We have a good leader for this town. Also, like the person who spoke before me, who’s against this ordinance, but I knew and I understood that if they're going to be able to come in, if there's an order, obviously if there's someone accused of a crime, they need to bring an order.

I feel like that's what our leader is talking about. That's all I can say. I wish I could say more, but I know there's only very little time. Thank you so much for listening to me.” Roberto Ibarra – “In Europe, it's one community. This continent is not one continent. It's not one city, one country. No, it's divided. And somebody is messing up, somebody playing to their own rules. We all know that. We're not dumb, but governments are ... It didn't work according to whatever they want. Somebody who's higher, don't want it taken out, taken out, they're taken out and create property for people who are low income and what they have to do. Migrate? They have to migrate. And once they migrate, they find somebody. There's always somebody in there who teaches them and we're spending on the air. You can make more money, $3,000 a week without working on the fields. What's that person's going to do? It's going to go for the 3,000, better than 2,000 or 3,000 and work all day in the fields. It's messed up deal here. It's going, "But nevertheless, I appreciate what you're doing and I appreciate it. And I stand by you if that's all. All the people there are not behaving correctly in this country, get them out, period. I hate people when I see they doing drugs. I see the homeless doing drugs, the deteriorating of their houses because they doing drugs. I dislike that. I've been telling you though, all these things, the drugs, things that's going on is because the deteriorating people, families are deteriorating. Somebody's in there in their workplace. I past through that. And I joined the service at US Navy to get out of that stuff. And it gave me the courage to ... I saw so many things in the Navy and I said, "Hey, it's not for me, but I'm going to stand to myself." I see somebody who's pushing drugs and illegal aliens or whatever this call, ‘Hey, get them out. Get them out.’ Thank you.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz closed public comment.

Council Member Morris – “Yeah, this is ... First of all, let me ask, do we know how many cities in California have adopted this ordinance proposal?”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Off the top of my head, no, but I know that there's been quite a few.” Council Member Morris – “Oh, because I can see that the proposed ordinance came from the city of South San Francisco and the city of Pinole, right? I'm not sure.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Correct. I have an explanation for that.” Council Member Morris – “Yeah. And I know that if we adopt this ordinance, that means that we'd be the first in Kern County. There's no other city in Kern County that has this proposal. And I really think that we have put some important priorities in place through SB54 to try to protect our immigrants from ICE.

And I think we're already a sanctuary city and the federal government, of course, is always threatening.

We don't know because they keep threatening us through to withhold money or whatever else. They want to scare communities that are sanctuary cities in California. But I don't like drawing any more attention to our city where the federal government is keeping a close eye on us. And I know that we need to protect the wellbeing of our community, and I'm just afraid that we would be constantly on their radar if we adopt this proposal. And then we don't know what the repercussions are, would be for government funding or how that would affect our community or our city. And not knowing because we don't know any of the city that's proposed this ordinance in their city or how that has worked for them. I don't think we want to take that chance right now. And I've talked to a lot of people in our community who are quite apprehensive about drawing that attention to our community. So, with that, I am not for the proposal, so that's where I stand at this point.”
Council Member Osorio – “Yeah, thank you, Mayor. First, thank you to everyone for your feedback, comments, and stories. I'm sorry we didn't get to everyone this evening, but nonetheless, getting a policy like this in front of us takes effort. So, I commend city staff's preparation, the community for providing input, my colleagues for considering this. As many of us who grew up in Delano, and as we see the news of families being traumatically separated by federal agencies, I think we understand the anxiety going around our immigrant families in Delano. And as a local elected official, I want our residents to be able to access or use city services without fear. And I believe this policy is one tool to facilitate that. But as we are coming to the conclusion of discussing this, I want to reiterate what the mayor has said, what some community members have said, which is that we don't want to overstate the scope of the policy. This ordinance prevents ICE from entering private city employee areas, and it says that they cannot conduct operations in public spaces like our parks or community centers without a warrant. That's that, but that's a solid step. The ordinance would still allow ICE agents to physically enter and be present in those public spaces. And even though folks are saying it may block federal intervention, I believe that the door is still technically open. We just hope that they enforce the law lawfully, especially when we see individuals, both immigrants and citizens with no criminal records being detained violently in other parts of California and in the country. The fear for a family seeing an agent in the city building would be the same, whether they are conducting an operation or not. But even with those limitations, taking action matters. And despite the fear that exists, establishing this boundary is something tangible to protect our public spaces, and I think it's a step in the right direction. But to close my comments, I hope that we strongly as a body here, as a community, consider revisiting other topics that can provide tangible protections as well that have come before this council, which is making sure our data sharing technologies aren't overly sharing sensitive information with federal agencies, as has been the case in other cities across the state. Further, a few years ago, we discussed the prospects of a legal defense fund to support local constituents. And if we are to be community first, I hope today's discussion is a starting line and that there's still more to be considered. So, I will be in support of this ordinance. Thank you.” Council Member Alindajao – “I think the premise of the mayor's ordinance is, as he was quoting the recent newspaper and TV coverage of it, that Latinos are being hunted in the streets of America to justify a proposed ordinance restricting federal immigration enforcement on state property. The proposal aims to ban ICE from using city resources such as parking lots, staging areas and buildings, et cetera. So, I think the issue here, I think we need to focus on what the issue actually is. We're not here to discuss federal immigration enforcement. I agree there's a lot of stories out there, a lot of news coverage about federal agents acting in bad faith, doing things that violate the Constitution, specifically the Fourth Amendment. I don't disagree with that, but that's not what we're here tonight for. We're not here to discuss the tension of individuals who are stopped, arrested, and being prosecuted by the federal government. I don't disagree with a lot of the comments and published news stories out in the community that there are mistreatment of some detainees. Conditions are sometimes deplorable. I don't disagree with that, but again ... Go closer. Okay. Can you hear me okay now? All right. Sorry. I don't disagree with the fact that there have been deplorable conditions in which detainees have been held that been treated, et cetera. I don't disagree with that. But again, that is not the issue before the council tonight. The issue before the council tonight is, will this use ordinance somehow protect the community? I heard a lot of comments about we want public safety. In fact, I think the mayor's proposing or arguing that this is somehow going to protect the community. And I just don't see the nexus, the connection between restricting the federal government from using city property and the protection of the public. In fact, there's zero evidence that federal immigration enforcement officers are hunting down individuals in the City of Delano. I haven't heard of a major operation in the City of Delano. There's absolutely no evidence. This ordinance is really a solution seeking a problem that just doesn't exist. Again, I heard a couple of comments about SB54. I heard the mayor comment about SB54. SB54 targets or focuses on law enforcement agencies and their cooperation with federal immigration officials. However, as one, I believe one comment was that in 2019, one of the public comments, which is accurate, in 2019, the City of Delano voted to adopt a sanctuary city status for the city, which I believe encompasses city buildings already. SB54 focuses on police department, and of course, we can litigate that issue, whether it does apply to city government buildings or not. The action that the council took in 2019, we can argue about that. But in my opinion, in my view, I believe that it does cover city buildings. But then again, the federal government's not knocking on our door unless staff can tell me otherwise. They're not knocking on our door asking to use our facilities to conduct ICE operations. I think the federal government has enough resources and wherewithal to enforce federal immigration law without the help of the city, city government. So, I think this is more of a solution in search of a problem that is really, at the end of the day, pointless. Another concern that I have, and I think one of the public comments brought up is that I think we're creating a sense of false hope in the community. We have a lot of public comments in which citizens are telling us, "Hey, we're really concerned about our safety. We're really concerned about our safety." And the inference is that somehow the City of Delano can do something about that to protect or to alleviate their fears, but that is simply not the case. Again, if the federal officials and law enforcement are looking for you, they will find you and they will arrest you. They will knock doors down with a proper warrant. They'll do whatever it takes to find their target, and there's nothing, not a damn thing the city's going to do about it. Now, you want to discuss enforcement and treatment of individuals, of detainees, of arrestees, violation of the Fourth Amendment, mistreatment while in detention facilities, that's a different conversation. And frankly, that conversation is a subject matter of the federal government and your federal representatives in Washington. It's not a subject matter for the City of Delano to take up. And I'm sorry that's happening. I'm sorry that people's rights are being violated. I'm sorry, and I feel bad that people are being mistreated. They're in deplorable conditions while being detained, but that's not within the subject matter of the city. So that's one issue that there's nothing about the ordinance. There's not an issue that I see that is compelling, urgent, or necessary that requires the city of Delano to pass an ordinance to simply allow the federal government not to use the government buildings. Again, my argument is that that law or that prohibition already exists with a 2019 enactment of sanctuary status for the city. The other issue that I see that's raised with this ordinance is the effectiveness of the solution.

Again, I think I touched on that a little bit already. The effectiveness of this ordinance is moot. In other words, it's not effective at all. It will do nothing to alleviate fears. It does nothing to protect public safety.

I think arguably, public safety is implicated when federal immigration officers can execute a valid judicial warrant and arrest people that are committing violent crimes, murders, rapes, getting them off the streets. Really, it's on that side of the aisle that I think public safety is really implicated, not in, "You can't use my building." So, I fail to see the nexus between, "You can't use my building.” and a safe community. I think what's making this community safe is the gentlemen that are in this room and the Chief, those that wear the badge in the blue uniform, those are the individuals that are making significant progress at a material dent in public safety when it comes to this community in this city. Again, federal law trumps, state law, I don't think there's anything really that the city government's going to do by way of ordinance that's going to stop federal officials. Again, SB54, I understand from Council Member Morris that this ordinance is adopted from the City of South San Francisco. Perhaps they have to make their own decisions. Perhaps that's an issue of significance in the City of South San Francisco. But I can tell you from being in the city all my life, representing this community since 2018, that that has never been an issue when it comes to the use of government buildings, federal law enforcement and public safety. I fail to see the nexus between the two. Again, I think this ordinance is really about political theater. I think this is just a political stunt to get attention. I think in that we've succeeded. We've gotten the attention of the community, the county, the press, the community. For an ordinance that really is, like I said, a solution looking for a problem, I encourage my colleagues to vote this measure down. Thank you.”
Mayor Pro Tem Nunez – “I am not in favor of this ordinance. I think it's an ordinance that's given a false sense of security to people who are already afraid of what's going on, what we're seeing on TV, what you're hearing, all the rumors and everything else. There's nothing saying that they cannot come to this building if they're chasing you. What's going to eventually happen, and we've seen this happen several years ago, people who feel that if I can get to a city property, I'm going to be safe. And that's not the case.

You can run. We see that 25 years being a police officer. People say we get behind them, pull them over and they don't want to stop and we get into pursuit and they pull into their driveway and they say, "Hey, I made it home. You can't stop me anymore. I'm at home." There's a thing I believe is case law behind the calls. Hop pursuit. Chase you all the way till they grab you. They can choose the location where to go get you. When they're coming for you already, regardless what law enforcement agency, either it's immigration, custom informants or police department, sheriff department, highway patrol, whoever you want to say, US marshals, they already have a warrant for you. They don't need the stage in our parking lots for our cities to come and enforce it. They can look for you, sit there. They'll sit in front of your house. They'll sit in the Vallarta parking lot. They'll sit in Walmart. They'll sit in Target. They don't care where they're going to sit. They're going to sit there. This ordinance does not restrict them from going there. All it says is they cannot use our building to stage. They'll go somewhere else. They're not going to sit here and stage if they're looking for you if you live over off of Garces and Albany. There's no need to stay here. They're going to go sit in those areas and enforce you. There's nothing in here that safeguards anybody. That's all I have.”
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz – “Okay. I'm going to try to address some concerns and questions that I heard from the audience and some that I heard up here on the dais. And of course, there are exceptions to a warrant and I won't get into the details of that, but there are exceptions to a warrant. If you want to learn about them, search them up, research them. And of course, if there's an exception to a warrant, then that of course is not needed. But in terms of this policy being phrased as political ambition or political theater, when did we assume that fighting for our immigrant community, that advocating for our immigrant community is political theater? You know what's political theater to me, and we don't call it out, is prioritizing to further alienate our street vendors, which is something that individuals on this council have done before. So how is that not political theater, but this is? Okay. The other part of it, there's currently a Kern County injunction because of what we saw initially. So this idea that, oh, it hasn't happened here. We haven't seen it. There was actually a Kern County injunction that occurred when this administration came into power that said that they cannot stop individuals just because of the color of their skin. You want to know why? Because they were stopping people based on the color of their skin.

And in order for someone to be stopped, you need reasonable suspicion, not just to be brown in America.

And yes, I did bring forward two policies, one from South San Francisco and another from the City of Pinol, and I'll tell you why. Because yes, no other city has done it in Kern County. So does that mean that it stops us from doing it? What I did, is I took a step back and I said, ‘What in the hell are elected leaders in California doing?’ And thankfully, because of the connections and the networks that I've made, I have two friends who are the mayors and elected representatives of those two cities who said, ‘Sal, we did this.

This is what you can do to put those guardrails up.’ I am not trying to paint a false hope here. I'm not trying to paint a false hope that Immigration Customs Enforcement or Border Patrol that you're going to be safe from them. That is not what this policy says. This policy provides guidelines on administrative procedures on saying if they do come here and they want to do some type of raid or you name it, that there's going to be documentation, that the City Manager's going to contact department heads, community members, elected representatives. There's going to be a documentation process. And guess what? This actually doesn't go that far because there's another city that actually incorporates in their ordinance that if they do, if they do not listen and abide by this ordinance, there's a lawsuit that initially takes place. I did not incorporate that in this because it's important to look at the pros and cons of all of it. I will say as well that there's this idea, of course, that this is only to target public safety, and that's actually not the case. If that is only what we got from this, you're missing the point. This does not just target public safety. This is about our residents accessing the city services that they need to access. And yes, it hasn't happened in Delano, but am I going to be the first one to say, ‘Have you not turned on the TV? Have you not turned on the news?’ And if it offends people that much that I say that Latinos are being hunted in the streets of America, turn on the news because what we are witnessing should shake all of us to our core. And this idea as well that this does not do anything, that this policy does not do anything. It's false sense of security. Well, then this same council, or of course others who are not here, voted for the sanctuary city policy or resolution. And the reason that I didn't go with resolution, and I'll tell you why. In my opinion, is because a resolution is a statement of our values, and I appreciate the heck out of it. I do. But this is an ordinance because we are trying to make sure that there is an administrative procedure of if this happens, what do we do? And let me tell you, I've said it countless times. If we fail to prepare, we fail our community. If we say we're not going to have conversations because it's uncomfortable or because we don't want to seem as a target, what in the heck are we doing here? And so with that, I respect my colleague's decision. I really do because this is America and in America, we have differences of opinions. And right now in our politics and our government, it is frowned upon to have tough conversations on that matter. And I believe that this conversation in itself, guess what? It just opened up a box of what in the heck are we doing in Kern County? Okay. So, with that said, I have a motion to approve. Do I have a second?”
Motion was made for approval by: Solorio-Ruiz;
2nd by: Osorio
Vote: 2-3 (Motion Failed)
Ayes: Solorio-RuizOsorio
Nays: Nunez/Alindajao/Morris

Absent: None
Abstentions: None

DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
No Items.

COUNCIL STATEMENTS AND REPORTS
Council Member Bryan Osorio – “Yeah, I think just on my end, want to share that in partnership with the Chamber of Commerce, we attended the resource fair for DreamBig. They'll be having some early intervention for kids under the age of five. They're not open just yet, but I think they have a great program that's going to be up and running soon. I also want to thank Vice Mayor Nunez for the invitation to the crab feed luncheon this past weekend where I believe all of my colleagues attended. It was great seeing family and friends there. And of course, we were all at the grant opening of Target this past week, and a lot of people are excited. A lot of people seemed happy, and so it's great to see economic development grow in the city of Delano. That's it for me.”
“Sorry, Mayor, can I just echo that sentiment? I think it's a high priority. And yeah, I think I've heard it on Albany, on County line, on Randolph. So yeah, I think if we can have a discussion on that at a future meeting, that'd be great.”
Council Member Alindajao – “Thank you, Mayor. I attended the same grand opening of Target. If any of you have not been to Target yet, you should go visit. It's a beautiful store. One of probably the nicest targets in the county. We had a great time. Everybody was there. A lot of people were there. I want to also ask our city staff to bring an issue back. I'm not sure if it goes by way of study, first of traffic study, but I've received a few complaints about a particular intersection on the West Side Seventh and Dover Place.

And it's one of those on the west side, those intersections where there's no yield on either side in either direction. And I think it's creating some issues. There's been at least two accidents or collisions there that I know of, and that's Seventh and Dover Place. Look into that, please. I also attended the crab feed with our council. We had a good time. Always good to see old friends that you don't see often on a regular basis, so had a good time. If you missed it this year, make plans to attend next year. It goes to a great cause, and I hope to see you next year. Thank you. Goodnight.” Council Member Morris – “I've been talking to people in the community and every time I meet up with something, they're always talking about speeding cars. And I know that's probably prevalent all around the city because every time I hear it's a different street somewhere. And I know people are getting upset because their pets are getting run over or something's happening, but I don't know what we can do about that or set up those things to say how fast you're going or whatever. But I think that's a primary concern for the people that live here in this community is that speeding cars because they all want the bumper, the little thing. Everybody on their street, and I go, "Well, that's not going to happen because it's a major artery road or something like that. You just can't put those speed bumps there." But everybody call says, ‘Put a speed bump over here.’ So if you look into that or see what we can do about curbing some of that in our community.”
Mayor Pro-Tem Nunez – “I also attended the Target grand opening. One of the things that I learned at the Target through the developers in the area, they say it's okay. We can say this. They have signed and are currently in the process of building the Dutch Pros and the Chick-fil-A are both coming in at the entrance to Target. Other than that, that's all I have.” “Just be careful. We're asking for enforcement. So this place is going to get full with people who got speeding tickets, and there's going to be a lot of our people that, "Oh, I was late to school. I was late to work. I was late to this. This was put up in the city council when I was a police officer, and I was assigned off of Cecil and Browning with car speeding. And the first car I pulled over was a Delando City Council member doing 72 miles an hour and a 25." Just understand it's coming.” Mayor Solorio-Ruiz - “Thank you for that. Myself, included with Vice Mayor Nunez and Councilman Morris, we attended the award dinner for our City Manager. I got to bring it up. Come on now. Our city manager received the Darrell Houth Brand Regional Award of Merit for Distinguished Leadership at this year's Kern County Council of Governments. Congratulations to the manager. And I've said it countless times, the success of this city is because of its leadership, and I put you at the top, of course. So, thank you, of course, the chief as well for his work in our community. I also, as many others, have been participating in Read Across America. It is some long days talking to these young people and reading some books to them and a lot of requests that we have coming in. Let's see, what else? What else? Of course, I also participated in the grand opening of Target. That is a big deal, and I don't think I have to explain much more of how much of a big deal it is. I think the city is really moving forward in the direction that a lot of folks want it to go to, and I think that it is absolutely something that we should applaud. And of course, it's thanks to staff, to poor staff who's here in the audience as well for the vision that we all have for this great city. I also want to note the Delano Police Department is educating community about the virtual kidnappings of don't become a victim, where someone calls you portraying to be someone else, and they try to ask for money, et cetera. There's social media posts about it that educate community. So please let folks know to not fall into being a victim of that. And then I also attended the crab feed. Thank you, the Guadalupe, and then of course the crab feed as well. And I believe that is all on my end.”

CLOSED SESSION
No items

ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Nunez seconded by Osorio and unanimously carried 5-0 to adjourn the meeting at 7:39pm. _____________________________________________
Ricardo G. Chavez, City Clerk

MINUTES

CITY OF DELANO
CITY COUNCIL – SPECIAL MEETING
March 23, 2026

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1015 – 11th Avenue.

FLAG SALUTE
Mayor Solorio-Ruiz led the flag salute.

ROLL CALL
Council members present: Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Joe Alindajao, Liz Morris, Council members absent: Mario Nunez, Bryan Osorio

OFFICIALS PRESENT
Chief of Police Nicholson, City Clerk Chavez, Finance Director Rios, City Engineer Rodriguez and Commander Nino

SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM(S)
1) Authorization to purchase two vehicles from Delano Chevrolet GMC and mobile radios from Motorola Solutions to support CalVIP Cohort 4 Crime Prevention program operations, utilizing CalVIP Cohort 4 Match Funds in a total amount not to exceed $111,548.14 2) Authorization to purchase a community outreach van from Quality Vans & Specialty Vehicles and a mobile radio from Motorola Solutions to support CalVIP Cohort 4 Crime Prevention program operations, utilizing CalVIP Cohort 4 Match Funds in a total amount not to exceed $131,828.02
3) Approval of payment of Southern California Edison invoice for $128,197.15 for undergrounding and relocating the overhead power lines associated with the County Line Road and High Street Traffic Control Signal project and authorize the City Manager or her designee to sign any documents needed to complete this work Motion was made approved items 1-3 by: Solorio-Ruiz/Alindajao/Morris /Osorio; 2nd by: Solorio-Ruiz/Alindajao/Morris /Osorio
Vote: 3-0
Ayes: Solorio-Ruiz/Alindajao/Morris
Nays: Nunez/Osorio

Absent: None
Abstentions: None
Agenda Item: 4

ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Alindajao seconded by Morris and unanimously carried 3-0 to adjourn the closed session meeting at 5:17 pm.
_____________________________________________
Ricardo G. Chavez, City Clerk

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 5
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Brandon Rodriguez, PE, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Acceptance of the 2024 Transit Maintenance Facility Roofing Project and authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the 2024 Transit Maintenance Facility Roofing Project and authorize staff to file the notice of completion with the County Recorder.

DISCUSSION
The City of Delano Engineering Department recommends acceptance of the work and the filing of the notice of completion for the 2024 Transit Maintenance Facility Roofing Project since the work is in conformance with the plans and specifications. The project included repairs of blisters, seams, and damaged gravel stops, as required by the product manufacturer, plus installation of insulation vents. The roof area was covered by a waterproofing system, including parapets, an estimated 23,000 square feet. The system consisted of roof cleaning and preparation, removal of all gravel, priming some components as needed and application of 20 dry mils of reflective ceramic coating (2 coats) over 80 mils of dry membrane. The project was awarded to Marko Construction Group, Inc. of Fresno, CA on October 7, 2024, and substantially completed on March 11, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
None; funds previously budgeted are adequate to cover project costs.

Attachment: Notice of Completion

RECORDING REQUESTED BY, FOR THE
BENEFIT OF, AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF DELANO
1015 11th AVENUE
DELANO, CALIFORNIA 93215
GC 27388.1 (a) 2(2) Recorded Document
is expressly exempted from Payment of
Recording Fee (FBO Government Agency)

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
AND

ACCEPTANCE OF WORK
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that work has been completed on that certain project known as the 2024 Transit Maintenance Facility Roofing Project, located at 2727 W Industry Way in the City of Delano, on March 11, 2026, and that said project was accepted by this Agency on April 6, 2026. The undersigned Agency owns the following interest in the public improvements installed for the development described above: own, operate, maintain, repair, and replace, public facility improvements.

The Contractor on the project was Marko Construction Group, Inc. performing work for the City of Delano. Refer to construction contract documents for all information relating to said project.

The address of the undersigned Agency is Delano City Hall, 1015 11th Avenue, Delano, California 93215.

CITY OF DELANO
__________________________________ _________________________ Brandon Rodriguez, P.E. Date
City of Delano, City Engineer

ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk
I certify under the Penalty of Perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
_______________________________________
Brandon Rodriguez, P.E.

City of Delano, City Engineer
Executed on at Delano, California.

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 6
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Noemi A. Zamudio, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: Adopt resolution extending the Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I Hiring Bonus Program
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution extending the Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I Hiring Bonus Program.

Discussion
The Communication Center continues to struggle with high turnover and staff shortage.

Currently there are three vacancies.

Staff has seen an increase in applicants since the hiring bonus program was adopted. The hiring bonus currently in place expired on June 30, 2026. Staff wishes to stay competitive with surrounding agencies, therefore, staff is recommending to extend the hiring bonus through fiscal year 2026-27.

The extension was provided to DCEA and no opposition was received.

Budget Impact
$40,000 annually, incorporated into the Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

Attachment(s)
Resolution
Hiring Program for Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO

EXTENDING THE HIRING BONUS PROGRAM FOR NEWLY HIRED PUBLIC

SAFETY & COMMUNICATIONS DISPATCHER I
WHEREAS, On December 20, 2021, City Council approved a hiring bonus for new Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I; and
WHEREAS, City Council wishes to extend the hiring bonuses of newly hired Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I through FY 2026/27; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. THAT STAFF hereby recommends to the City Council that it ADOPT the Hiring Bonus Program for Newly Hired Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I for fiscal year 2026/27, based on the findings enumerated hereinabove.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Delano at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2026-
City of Delano
Hiring Bonus Program
For Newly Hired Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I In order to increase the number and quality of applicants and new hires of Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I, the City is extending the hiring bonus program. The hiring bonuses for new hires will be in effect through fiscal year 2026-27, or until the program is terminated by the City Manager, whichever occur first. The program shall be applicable only to employees hired after the City Council adopts the program.

The terms of the hiring bonuses are as follows:

A. A new employee hired as a Public Safety & Communications Dispatcher I on or after July 1, 2026, and before June 30, 2027 will be eligible to receive a hiring bonus of $5,000. a. The one-time hiring bonus will be paid as follows:
i. $2,500 paid with first paycheck; and
ii. $2,500 paid on the first paycheck following successful completion of the probationary period.

B. The hiring bonus is not considered “salary” or “base pay” and shall not be included for the purposes of retirement benefit calculations or salary increases. The hiring bonus amount is subject to Federal and State tax withholdings as bonus earnings.

C. Payment of the hiring bonus is contingent upon:
a. Employee being hired as a new City employee after the adoption of this program, but before expiration or termination of the program;
b. Employee being actively employed at the time of any payment; and c. Employee being in good standing and not subject to a performance improvement plan.

D. The City shall have the right to unilaterally terminate the hiring bonus at any time prior to June 30, 2027, without meeting and conferring on the decision to terminate the program or the impacts of terminating the program. Any employees hired under the program, but before the program is terminated, will be entitled to the second payment upon successful completion of probation. However, no new employees will be eligible for the hiring bonus after the program is terminated or expires.

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 7
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Noemi A. Zamudio, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: Adopt resolution revising the Police Officer Hiring Bonus Program, and extending it through fiscal year 2026-27 and authorize the Finance Director to appropriate funds
Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council adopt the proposed resolution revising and extending the Police Officer Hiring Bonus Program through fiscal year 2026-27.

Discussion
On September 20, 2021, City Council approved a hiring bonus of $7,000 for new Police Officers. The hiring bonus serves to entice new applicants.

The hiring bonus currently in place for new Police Officer will expire on June 30, 2026.

We currently have seven vacancies and staff wishes to stay competitive with surrounding agencies, therefore, staff is recommending to extend the hiring bonus through fiscal year 2026-27.

In an effort to attract Lateral Police Officers, staff is recommending to increase the hiring bonus for only Lateral Police Officers to $15,000.

Lateral Police Officers will be defined as applicants that meet the following:
• Have graduated for a POST approved Police Academy,
• Possess a Basic POST certificate,
• Have successfully completed a probationary period with another law enforcement agency.

The extension was provided to DPOA and no opposition was received.

Budget Impact
Approximately $139,000 annually. Increase budget for FY 2026/27 by $48,000.

Attachment(s)
Resolution
Hiring Program for Police
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 -

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO

REVISING THE HIRING BONUS PROGRAM FOR NEW POLICE OFFICERS AND EXTENDING THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, On September 20, 2021, City Council approved a hiring bonus for police officers; and
WHEREAS, City Council wishes to revise the hiring bonus for new police officers effective April 6, 2026; and
WHEREAS, City Council wishes to extend the hiring bonus for new police officers through FY 2026/27; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. THAT STAFF hereby recommends to the City Council that it ADOPT the changes to the Hiring Bonus Program for New Police Officers and extend it through fiscal year 2026/27, based on the findings enumerated hereinabove.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Delano at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2026-
City of Delano
Hiring Bonus Program
for Police Officers
In order to increase the number and quality of applicants for Police Officer, the City is revising the hiring bonus program. The hiring bonuses for new Police Officers will be in effect April 6, 2026 and through fiscal year 2026-27, or until the program is terminated by the City Manager, whichever occur first. The program shall be applicable only to new hires or promotions of existing staff to the classification of Police Officer after the City Council adopts the program.

The terms of the hiring bonuses are as follows:

A. A new hire or promoted city employee as a Police Officer on or after April 6, 2026, and before June 30, 2027, will be eligible to receive a hiring bonus of $7,000. a. The one-time hiring bonus will be paid as follows:
i. $1,000 paid with first paycheck; and
ii. $6,000 paid on the first paycheck following successful completion of the probationary period.

B. A newly hired Lateral Police Officer on or after April 6, 2026, and before June 30, 2027, will be eligible to receive a hiring bonus of $15,000.
a. The one-time hiring bonus will be paid as follows:
i. $1,000 paid with the first paycheck; and
ii. $14,000 paid on the first paycheck following successful completion of the probationary period.
b. Lateral Police officers are defined as someone who:
i. Possess a POST approved Academy Certificate,
ii. Possess a Basic POST Certificate,
iii. Have successfully completed a probationary period with another law enforcement agency.

C. The hiring bonus is not considered “salary” or “base pay” and shall not be included for the purposes of retirement benefit calculations or salary increases. The hiring bonus amount is subject to Federal and State tax withholdings as bonus earnings.

Resolution No. 2026-
D. Payment of the hiring bonus is contingent upon:
a. Employee being hired as a new City employee or current staff being promoted to Police Officer after the adoption of this program, but before expiration or termination of the program;
b. Employee being actively employed at the time of any payment; and c. Employee being in good standing and not subject to a performance improvement plan.

E. The City shall have the right to unilaterally terminate the hiring bonus at any time prior to June 30, 2027, without meeting and conferring on the decision to terminate the program or the impacts of terminating the program. Any employees hired under this resolution, but before the program is terminated, will be entitled to the second payment upon successful completion of probation. Any employee hired as an officer prior to April 6, 2026, will follow the resolution in place at the time of their hire. However, no new employees will be eligible for the hiring bonus after the program is terminated or expires.

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 8
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Brandon Rodriguez, PE, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Adopt a resolution declaring the former Voice of America Property (APNs 520-140-01, 521-090-01, 521-090-02, 521-090-03), not including an approximately 20-acre portion thereof to be retained for future park purposes, to be surplus property, authorizing the City Manager to issue a Notice of Availability of the surplus property, and finding the same to be exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution declaring the former Voice of America Property (APNs 520-140-01, 521-090-01, 521-090-02, 521-090-03), not including an approximately 20-acre portion thereof to be retained for future park purposes, to be surplus property, authorizing the City Manager to issue a Notice of Availability of the surplus property, and finding the same to be exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

DISCUSSION
In June 2020, the City of Delano purchased from the United States of America approximately 800 acres of real property that was theretofore commonly referred to as the “Voice of America Property,” consisting of four parcels (APNs 520-140-01, 521-090-01, 521-090-02, 521-090-03). The Voice of America Property is generally bounded by West Garces Highway to the north, Casey Avenue to the west, Melcher Road to the east, and a quarter mile south of Woollomes Avenue to the south and comprises approximately 800 acres. The Voice of America Property was home to the Delano Transmitting Station; a shortwave relay site built in 1944 to broadcast Voice of America programming worldwide.

Its operation ceased in 2007, and the site was subsequently demolished.

In 2021, the Voice of America Property was annexed to the City of Delano, together with several hundred acres of adjacent property. At that time, approximately 126 acres of the Voice of America Property was pre-zoned as Agriculture (A) and the remainder as Community Facilities (CF).

The City Council will consider whether to retain an approximately 20-acre portion of the Voice of America Property for future park purposes, and to designate the remainder of the Voice of America Property as “surplus” pursuant to the Surplus Land Act and authorize its sale. That portion of the Voice of America Property that the City Council will consider designating as “surplus” is referred to herein as the “VOA Surplus Property.” Disposition of the VOA Surplus Property would not conflict with the Delano General Plan.

The VOA Surplus Property is not identified as a site for potential park acquisition or development as a park or open space and is otherwise not necessary to achieve any goal, objective, or policy set forth in the Delano General Plan.

Pursuant to the Surplus Land Act, the city must prepare and send a Notice of Availability of the property to affordable housing sponsors, school districts within the jurisdiction, and others as specified by statute (the “designated entities”). The Notice of Availability must be in a form approved by the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”). A draft of the Notice, based on the template provided by HCD, is attached to this report. If one or more of the designated entities expresses an interest in the property within 60 days from the date the Notice is issued, the city must enter into a 90-day good faith negotiation period to determine a mutually satisfactory sales price and terms. If no designated entity expresses interest in the property within 60 days of the issuance of the Notice, or if price and terms cannot be agreed upon after the 90-day good faith negotiation period, the property may be disposed of without further regard to the Surplus Land Act.

If more than one entity provides the city with a notice of interest in the property, the city may negotiate concurrently with all entities that are interested in developing affordable housing on the property. If the city agrees on price and terms, priority must be given to a competing offer that includes a greater number of affordable units or, in case of tie in the number of units, the lowest level of affordability.

The city may impose reasonable conditions or restrictions on the surplus land. However, any such restrictions beyond those required by the General Plan and by the city’s zoning and subdivision standards may not have a substantial negative effect on the viability or affordability of housing development for very low-, low-, or moderate-income households.

Also, any such conditions must be reviewed by HCD before the Notice of Availability is issued.

If an entity proposes to use the surplus land for affordable housing, it must agree to make not less than 25 percent of the total number of units developed on the parcels available as affordable housing. A covenant or restriction must be recorded against the property ensuring that the affordable housing requirements set forth in the Surplus Land Act remain in place and enforceable for a minimum period (55 years for rental units and 45 years for ownership units).

Before finalizing any agreements or disposing of any surplus land, the city must provide HCD with a Post-Negotiation and Proposed Disposition Summary. The Summary must be submitted to HCD at least 30 days prior to disposition of the surplus land and must include a copy of the resolution (or other document recording formal action) declaring the property surplus, a description of the Notices of Availability sent, a description of negotiations conducted with any responding entities, including any non-solicited expressions of interest in regard to the disposal of the surplus land, proof of delivery of the Notice of Availability to all CalHFA-certified housing sponsors and local public entities, and a draft copy of any applicable restrictions to be recorded against the property. All of this information must be submitted on a form approved by HCD.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15312) which provides that projects consisting of the sale of surplus government property are exempt if the subject property is not located in an area of statewide, regional, or areawide concern identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. The VOA Surplus Property is not located in an area of statewide, regional, or areawide concern identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. Consequently, the project is exempt from review under CEQA.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

ATTACHMENTS

1. VOA Surplus Property Aerial

2. VOA Park Site Aerial

3. Notice of Availability

4. Resolution with Exhibit A
Ó
N
03/09/2026
Ó
N
03/09/2026
Ó
N
03/09/2026

QK, 3/5/2026
L:\Projects\2024\240145\ADMIN\QA-QC\VOA land and new well site - City owned\Legals\240145 - VOA Site - Exhibit A.doc
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

VOA SITE
Being a portion of that parcel of land conveyed in Quitclaim Deed recorded November 24, 2020, as Document Number 220180410, Kern County Official Records, situated in Section 16, Township 25 South, Range 25 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the City of Delano, County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the East Quarter corner of said Section 16; Thence along the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16, South 00°38’50” West, 154.10 feet;
Thence leaving said East line, North 89°21’02” West, 1,350.01 feet, to a point 1,350.00 feet West of the Southerly extension of the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 16; Thence along a line 1,350.00 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter and its Southerly extension, North 00°38’58” East, 660.00 feet; Thence perpendicular to the East line of said Northeast Quarter, South 89°21’02” East, 1,350.00 feet, to a point on the East line of said Northeast Quarter; Thence along the East line of said Northeast Quarter, South 00°38’50” West, 505.90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 20.45 acres, more or less.

See Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made a part thereof. 03/09/2026

POINT OF BEGINNING C MELCHER ROAD L

C WEST GARCES HIGHWAY L
Ó

WOOLLOMES AVENUE
N
03/09/2026

CITY HALL
1015 ELEVENTH AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 3010
DELANO, CALIFORNIA 93216-3010
(661) 721-3300
(661) 721-3317 TDD
www.cityofdelano.org

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz
MAYOR
Mario Nunez, Jr.

MAYOR PRO TEM
Joe L. Alindajao, Esq.

Liz Morris
Bryan Osorio
Maribel G. Reyna

CITY MANAGER
April 6, 2026
To All Interested Parties:

RE: Notice of Availability/Offer to Sell Surplus Property As required by Government Code Section 54220 of the State of California, the City of Delano is providing notification that the City intends to sell the surplus property listed in the accompanying table.

In accordance with Government Code Section 54222, you have sixty (60) days from the date this offer was sent via certified mail or electronic mail to notify the City of your interest in acquiring the property. However, this offer does not obligate the City to sell the property to you. Instead, the City would enter into at least ninety (90) days of negotiations with you pursuant to Government Code Section 54223. If no agreement is reached on sales price and terms, or lease terms, the City may market the property to the general public.

As required by Government Code Section 54227, if the City receives more than one letter of interest during this 60-day period, it will give first priority to entities proposing to develop housing where at least 25 percent of the units will be affordable to lower income households. If more than one such proposal is received, priority will be given to the proposal with the greatest number of affordable units. If more than one proposal specifies the same number of affordable units, priority will be given to the proposal that has the lowest average affordability level.

In the event your agency or company is interested in purchasing the property, you must notify the City in writing within sixty (60) days of the date this notice was sent via certified mail or electronic mail. Notice of your interest in acquiring the property should be delivered to Brandon Rodriguez, City Engineer, at City of Delano, 1015 11th Avenue, Delano, California 93215. You may also direct your questions to [email protected] or by calling 661-720-2219.

Entities proposing to submit a letter of interest are advised to review the requirements set forth in the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220-54234).

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Property Address None assigned. See attached site map.

Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) 520-140-01 (partial)
521-090-01
521-090-02
521-090-03
General Plan Designation 520-140-01: Community Facilities 521-090-01: Agriculture
521-090-02: Agriculture
521-090-03: Agriculture
Zoning Designation 520-140-01: Community Facilities
521-090-01: Agriculture
521-090-02: Agriculture
521-090-03: Agriculture
Minimum Density [each parcel] 520-140-01: Residential Use Not Permitted 521-090-01: No Minimum Density
521-090-02: No Minimum Density
521-090-03: No Minimum Density
Maximum Density [each parcel] 520-140-01: Residential Use Not Permitted 521-090-01: 1 Single Family per 20 Acres
521-090-02: 1 Single Family per 20 Acres
521-090-03: 1 Single Family per 20 Acres
Parcel Size [in acres] 520-140-01: ≈ 622.80
521-090-01: ≈ 40.28
521-090-02: ≈ 40.26
521-090-03: ≈ 80.53
Existing Uses Vacant/Unimproved
Minimum Asking Price N/A
Most Recent Appraisal $9,000 per acre
Date of Appraisal February 6, 2020

SITE MAP
Not Part of Surplus Property
1 RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO
DECLARING THE FORMER VOICE OF AMERICA PROPERTY (APNs
520-140-01, 521-090-01, 521-090-02, 521-090-03), NOT INCLUDING AN APPROXIMATELY 20-ACRE PORTION THEREOF TO BE RETAINED

FOR FUTURE PARK PURPOSES, TO BE SURPLUS PROPERTY,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A NOTICE OF

AVAILABILITY OF THE SURPLUS PROPERTY, AND FINDING THE

SAME TO BE EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

The City Council of the City of Delano does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council hereby finds as follows:

1. In June 2020, the City of Delano purchased from the United States of America approximately 800 acres of real property that was theretofore commonly referred to as the “Voice of America Property,” consisting of four parcels (APNs 520-140-01, 521- 090-01, 521-090-02, 521-090-03).

2. The Voice of America Property is generally bounded by West Garces Highway to the north, Casey Avenue to the west, Melcher Road on the east, and a quarter mile south of Woollomes Avenue to the south.

3. The City wishes to retain an approximately 20-acre portion of the Voice of America Property for future park purposes. The remainder of the Voice of America Property, hereinafter referred to as the “VOA Surplus Property,” is not necessary for the City’s use and the City wishes to declare that the VOA Surplus Property is surplus land as set forth in the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et seq.) (the “Act”).

The VOA Surplus Property is described and depicted on Exhibit A hereto and is incorporated herein by this reference.

4. The VOA Surplus Property is not identified as a site for potential park acquisition or development as a park or open space and is otherwise not necessary to achieve any goal, objective, or policy set forth in the Delano General Plan.

5. On November 12, 1015, the Planning Commission found that the potential disposition of the Voice of America Property is in conformity with the Delano General Plan.

6. Disposition of the VOA Surplus Property is consistent with the adopted goals, objectives, and policies of the Delano General Plan.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The City Council finds and determines that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15312 of the CEQA Guidelines (“Surplus Government Property Sales”). Furthermore, the City Council finds that the VOA Surplus Property is not located in an area of statewide, regional, or areawide concern identified in Section 15206(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines. 2 SECTION 3. Declaration of Surplus Land. The City Council hereby declares that the VOA Surplus Property is not necessary for the City’s use and is, in all respects, “surplus land” as defined in Government Code Section 54221(b)(1). The VOA Surplus Property is not identified as a site for potential park acquisition or development as a park or open space, and is otherwise not necessary to achieve any goal, objective, or policy set forth in the Delano General Plan.

SECTION 4. The City Manager or her designee is hereby directed to send a Notice of Availability, in substantially the form included in the agenda packet of materials accompanying this Resolution, to the Department of Housing and Community Development and to all entities designated in Government Code Section 54222 (“designated entities”) by certified mail or electronic mail.

SECTION 5. The City Manager, City Attorney, and City staff are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution. Such actions include, without limitation, negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the designated entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase the VOA Surplus Property in compliance with the Act.

SECTION 6. Exhibit. This Resolution includes the following exhibit which is attached hereto and made a part hereof:

Exhibit A: Legal Description and Depiction of VOA Surplus Property SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of March 2026. ____________________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Ricardo G. Chavez, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Mark D. Hensley
City Attorney

QK, 3/5/2026
L:\Projects\2024\240145\ADMIN\QA-QC\VOA land and new well site - City owned\Legals\240145 - Surplus Lands for Sale - Exhibit A.docx
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

SURPLUS LANDS FOR SALE
Being a portion of that parcel of land conveyed in Quitclaim Deed recorded November 24, 2020, as Document Number 220180410, Kern County Official Records, situated in Section 16 and the Northwest Quarter of Section 21, Township 25 South, Range 25 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the City of Delano, County of Kern, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Section 16;
Thence along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 16, South 00°38’58” West, 2,140.15 feet;
Thence leaving said East line, along a line perpendicular to said East line, North 89°21’02” West, 1,350.00 feet, to a point 1,350.00 feet West of the East line of said Northeast Quarter; Thence along a line 1,350.0 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said Northeast Quarter and its Southerly extension, South 00°38’58” West, 660.00 feet; Thence South 89°21’02” East, 1,350.01 feet, to a point on the East line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 16;
Thence along the East line of said Section 16, South 00°38’50” West, 2,492.32 feet, to the Southeast corner of said Section 16;
Thence along the South line of said Southeast Quarter, North 89°24’37” West, 2,647.77 feet, to the South Quarter corner of said Section 16, also being the North Quarter corner of said Section 21;
Thence along the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, South 00°44’56” West, 2,646.97 feet, to the Center of said Section 21;
Thence along the South line of said Northwest Quarter, North 89°26’05” West, 2,651.47 feet, to the West Quarter corner of said Section 21;
Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 21, North 00°48’14” East, 2,648.07 feet, to the Northwest corner of said Section 21, also being the Southwest corner of said Section 16;
Thence along the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 16, North 00°44’03” East, 2,647.68 feet, to the West Quarter corner of said Section 16;

QK, 3/5/2026
L:\Projects\2024\240145\ADMIN\QA-QC\VOA land and new well site - City owned\Legals\240145 - Surplus Lands for Sale - Exhibit A.docx
Thence along the West line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 16, North 00°43’39” East, 2,647.91 feet to the Northwest corner of said Section 16; Thence along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 16, South 89°22’35” East, 2,644.70 feet to the North Quarter corner of said Section 16; Thence along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 16, South 89°22’39” East, 2,644.37 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 783.87 acres, more or less.

See Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and made a part thereof. 03/09/2026

WEST GARCES HIGHWAY CASEY AVENUE (PRIVATE ROAD) MELCHER ROADPOINT OF BEGINNING

WOOLLOMES AVENUE
Ó
N
03/09/2026
Ó C MELCHER ROAD

C WEST GARCES HIGHWAY
℄ MELCHER ROAD CASEY AVENUE (PRIVATE ROAD)

C WEST GARCES HIGHWAY
N
L
L
L
03/09/2026

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 9
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Viviana Alapisco, Transportation Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of The City of Delano authorizing designated positions to execute any actions necessary for obtaining financial assistance provided by the Low Carbon Transit Operations (LCTOP) and authorizing the utilization of LCTOP funds to offer free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-aride and on-demand in the amount of $92,194.

Recommendation
Staff recommends City Council to adopt a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Delano designated positions to execute any actions necessary for obtaining financial assistance provided by the Low Carbon Transit Operations (LCTOP) and authorizing the utilization of Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds to offer free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and ondemand in the amount of $92,194 for 2025-2026.

Discussion
LCTOP has funding for Transportation Agencies from the California Department of Transportation, Division of Rail and Mass Transportation from The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. There is a set amount for each agency distributed through Kern COG once the project has been determined eligible by the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). Funds for the LCTOP are distributed to regions and transit operators using the State Transit Assistance program formula, which is 50% to regional entities based on populations and 50% to Transit Agencies based on Farebox Revenue, accordingly City of Delano FY 24/25 allocations is $92,194.

Staff will be submitting an allocation request to the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) before the April 28, 2026 deadline. This project will allow DART to offer free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on-demand to all general public passengers throughout the year to encourage ridership and promote public transportation. City Council must authorize and adopt a resolution showing approval of the specific project and project funds.

Staff will submit an allocation request for the FY25/26 to the LCTOP Program in the amount of $92,194. Project is expected to begin July 1, 2026 and end June 30, 2027.

Budget Impact
Finance to create new revenue account for these funds
Attachment(s)
Allocation Request
Authorized Agent
Certs and Assurances
Resolution
Apportionment Amount
Yes Yes
32 14
23 Years
Months
Kern
www.cityofdelano.org
Kern Council of Governments
Lead Agency Name: City of Delano
Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP: Cycle A
Lead Agency Information
Is your Cycle A and Cycle B project the same? Yes
Allocation Request Prepared by Contact (if different than "Prepared by") Name: Viviana Alapisco Name:

Caltrans District:

Does your agency have an approved Title VI Plan? Approved Date: 06/04/24 Title VI Attached:

County:

Agency Website:

Regional Planning Agency:

Po Box 3010
Delano, CA 93216
Name: Maribel Reyna Assembly*:

Title: City Manger Senate*:

E-mail: [email protected] E-mail:

Authorized Agent Legislative District Numbers
Title: Transportation Manager Title:

Phone #: 661-721-2284 Phone #:

Sub-Type: Implementation of free or reduced fares
Start date (anticipated) : 7/1/2026 End date (anticipated): 06/30/2027 Project Summary
Name: No more
than 2 lines
System-wide fre fare for the City of Delano and County Residents Description
(Short): No
more than 375
characters.

Allow free rides to the city and county residents of Delano duringthe year throughout all the systems to encourage riderships.

Type: Operations
Phone #: 661-720-2269 Congressional*:

E-mail [email protected] *if you have additional Districts, please provide a separate attachment The free fare project begins athe beginning of the fiscal year, which is July 1, 2026. It will end on the last day of the fiscal year which is June 30, 2027.

Project Life: For capital projects, state the project useful life in years. For operation projects, state the number of months a service will be funded.

Capital:

Operations: 18
Request LONP: Your agency has selected a start date prior to estimated Award Date of October 1 2026, please provide an explaination of your need to start your project before the Award Date. $92,194
Rollover Projects: Please provide the total number of years your agency plans to accumulate funds and how many years remaining, include this year.

Rollover Project: No
Total Years of Rollover:

Remaining Years of Rollover:

Funding: 99313: $88,936 99314: $3,258 Total:

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 1 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Information
Allocation Yr Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $3,258
Total LCTOP: $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,194
PUC 99314: $3,258
Total
PUC 99313: $88,936 $88,936
$0 $92,194
Other Funds: $0
Total CCI: $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0
$0
Other GGRF: $0
LCTOP Interest:

Contact Person: Viviana Alapisco 99313
Contact Phone #: 661-721-2284 $3,258 99314
$0 $92,194
Lead Agency: City of Delano Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Total: $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0
Contact Phone #: 661-635-2918 99314
Contact E-mails: [email protected]
Contributing Sponsor: Kern Council of Governments Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: Irene Enriquez $88,936 99313
Contact E-mail: [email protected]
Contact E-mails:

PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
Contact Phone #: 99314
Contributing Sponsor: Amount:

Contributing Sponsor: Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
Contact Phone #: 99314
Contact E-mails:

Contributing Sponsor: Amount: PUC Funds Type:

Contact Person: 99313
LCTOP funds will be used on a free fares system wide to encourage ridership on the Delano Area Rapid Transit system by offering free rides to the city and county residents of Delano everyday for the year until all funds are exhausted.

LCTOP will not supplant other funding sources for free rides.

Detailed Funding Information: This section should be completed to detail any CAP funds included in the “Prior” column, include the Project ID, amount of funds transferred, and CAP approval date(if available).

Not a rollover project.

Total FY 24-25 LCTOP Funding $92,194
Fully Funded Project: Provide a description of all the funds that will be used to complete this project and how LCTOP funds will not supplant other funding sources. Include the project ID and awarded funding amount from prior rollover years.

Contact Phone #: 99314
Contact E-mails:

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 2 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Plan
Total Project Funding
$0 $0
R/W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PS&E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 $0 $92,194
TOTAL $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,194
Operations/Other $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0
PS&E $0
PA&ED
Funding Source: Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 Total $0
Operations/Other $0
Equipment Purchase
$0
CON $0
R/W
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0
$0 $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 3 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Funding Plan
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 $0
R/W $0
PS&E
FY 28-29 Total
PA&ED $0
$92,194
TOTAL $0 $92,194 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,194
Operations/Other $92,194
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0
CON
Total
PA&ED $0
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
Veh/Equip Purchase $0
CON
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Funding Source:

Component Prior FY 25-26 (A) FY 25-26 (B) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
R/W $0
PS&E
Total
PA&ED $0
$0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Operations/Other
$0
Equipment Purchase $0
CON
Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 4 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
3) Project Costs - Provide an itemized breakdown of project components and describe how the cost estimations were developed. Please include marketing and bus wraps cost in this section. Total costs must correspond to the Funding Information section above. No more than 14 lines.

The project cost was developed by taking the cost per ride ($1.12) and dividing the apportionment amount; $92,194/$1.12 = 82,316. With the amount awarded, DART would be able to provide 82,316 free rides throughout the year.

LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project Information
1) Project Description - Provide a comprehensive project description. For operations projects, include: #of trips, span, frequency improvements, days of operation and marketing component (if applicable). For capital projects, include:
product specifications and identify all LCTOP funded components. No more than 14 lines.

The City of Delano will provide free fares for Fixed Routes, Dial A Ride and On Demand Services operating Monday thru Friday 7:00 am to 5:00 pm and Saturday 7:30 am to 4:30 pm, throughout the year to the City and the County of Delano residents and visitors. The number of days operating will be 285 days, offering 125,685 rides throughout the year and depending on the popularity of the program. The project will also provide free fares in disadvantaged communities to increase ridership and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Free rides will be everday services are offered of 25-26 Fiscal year from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026. Residents will be informed by advertising on the vehicles, transit center, bus shelters and city website.
2) Project Planning - Provide a detailed explanation of the project planning process and how it was designed to avoid substantial burden on any low- income, disadvantaged, and vulnerable populations. Include any public outreach, events, workshops or community input. No more than 14 lines.

Transit staff recommended that a free fares project would be an excellent way to promote transit within the City of Delano and to encourage riders to use public transit. The free fares project will allow current and potential riders to use public transportation without any financial hardsip, and take cars off the road reducing greenhouse gas emission and alleviating traffic in and around the city and county. The agency will reach out to Senior centers within city and county limits to inform them that transit will be offering free rides to the seniors. Seniors will be able to utilize the service to go to doctor appointments, shopping and socializing. Staff will send out information to the local elementary schools and high schools to inform students of the free fare program. When planning for this project, we had all our disadvantage and low income communities in mind where we would be able to provide free rides for people that otherwise are unable to drive and/or afford it.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 5 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
5) Agency Service - Describe the transit service provided and how the project plays into the overall operations. . No more than 2450 characters.

The service operates Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm and Satruday from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. The DART transit system runs anywhere between 30 minutes to 60 minutes. Public transit in Delano provides service throughout the City of Delano and the surrounding unincorportated areas includes fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on demand Services.
6) AB 680 Workforce Standards to Support Job Quality -As part of your FY 25-26 LCTOP Allocation Request Packet please include an electronic copy of your agency's most recently approved procurement manuals.

Yes Did you submit your approved procurement manual as part of your FY 25-26 LCTOP Allocation Request Packet?
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Agency Information
4) Agency Fare - Describe your agency's fare structure including any discounts or special fares and how the project will affect that structure, if at all. No more than 16 Lines.

Current fare structures are $1.50 per person for general public and $.75 for seniors. First child underage of 6 years old is able to ride transit for free with a paid adult, any additional child under 6 years old is $.50. Project will provide free fare for all residents.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 6 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project GHG Benefits
Project Yr. 1 Ridership Increase - Estimated
annual ridership contributed by the new
service or capital improvement in Yr1.
5,523
Expected free riders that will utilize the free fares.

Ridership from previous year (110,469) + 5% increase
equals 115,992.

Project Yr. F Ridership Increase - Estimated
annual ridership contributed by the new
service or capital improvement in YrF.
5,523
YrF ridership is the 110469 x 5% increase.

Year 1 (Yr1) - First year of service, or year
that capital improvements will be
completed.
2026
Free Transit Days will begin 07/01/2026 for one year or until funds are exhausted.

Year F (YrF) - Final year that the service is
funded or the final year of useful life for
capital improvements.
2027
Free transit days will end on 06/30/2027 with the
anticipation of a 5% increase of ridership from the
previous year.'
Greenhouse Gas Reductions - Describe qualitatively how this project will reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The goal of free fares project is to get single occupancy vehicles off the road and on to public transit to reduce VMT and reduce GHG. A lot of people in Delano are in the older age bracket and don't have a license to drive. Our senior poplulation relies on our system to go to doctor appointments, shopping , senior programs and/or running errands.

Greenhouse Gas Reductions - Please provide quantitative information requested below and explanations supporting the data provided.

Value Explanation
Total Project VMTs Reduced 21,844This number is calculated based on the values above.

Total Project GHG Emission Reductions
(MTCO2e) 9.51
This number is calculated based on the values from
above and the QM-Tool tab.

Project Useful Life 1This is calculated based on the values above.

Total Project Ridership Increased 5,523This is calculated based on the values above.

Adjustment (A) - Adjustment factor to
account for Choice Riders.Use defaults
values listed on

0.561
based on values listed on the supplemental
guidance.

Trip Length (L) - Length (miles) of average
auto trip reduced or average passenger trip
length. You may use defaults values list ed
on

7.05 City of Delano estimated average trip length for trips made within the city is 7.05 miles.

FY 25-26 LCTOP Project GHG Emission
Reductions (MTCO2e) 9.51
This number is calculated based on the values from
above and the QM-Tool tab.

Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 7 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
xx
xx xx xx
xx
Transit Facility Parking Cost
($/Roundtrip/Rider) (Average cost to park to
use transit associated with project)
$0.00 Not applicable
Avoided Parking Cost ($/Roundtrip/Rider)
(Average avoided parking cost associated
with project)
$0.00 Not applicable
Baseline Average One-Way Fare Cost
($/One-Way Trip/Rider) (Average fare per
boarding, prior to project implementation)
$1.12 Regulare fares for DART (1.50+.75)/2 average one way fare cost.

New Average One-Way Fare Cost
($/One-Way Trip/Rider) (Average fare per
boarding resulting from project
implementation)
$0.00 This is a free fare program, therefore there is no amount.

Value Explanation
Travel Cost Savings Benefits
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Project Benefits
Co-Benefits - Describe benefits selected above and other benefits not listed.

Improved public health: The project will improve air quality and reduce green gas emissions by removing single occupancy vehicles off the road reducing pollution. Promotes active Transportation: The project will encourage the use of public trasnsportation, whre people without cars are able to get from point A to point B. Our buses are also equipped with bicycle racks that fit two bikes, so bicyclists are able to put their bikes on our buses if their riding distance is too far for them to bike. Promotes integration with other modes as we have Kern Transit and Tulare County Area Tansit that stop at the transit center. Coordination with Educational Institution: there is a bus stop at every elementary school, junior high school, high school, and community college.

Improved Public Health College Grades K-12
Reduced Operating/Maintenance Costs Promotes Active Transportation Increase System Reliability Promotes Integration w/ other modes Avoided Toll Cost ($/Roundtrip/Rider)
(Average avoided toll cost associated with
project)
$0.00 Not applicable
Co-Benefits - Check all additional Benefits/Outcomes.

Improved Safety Coordination with Educational Institution Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 8 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
xx
xx
LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Community Engagement Co-Benefit
To estimate the community engagement co-benefit, users will respond to the five questions below. Based on the responses to the questions, the level of community engagement will be evaluated as low, medium, or high. 1) Is the project being proposed for LCTOP funding, a neighborhood-scale, city/regional-scale, or rural-scale project? Rural
h. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by a communitybased organization, community-driven steering committee, or similar entity designed, planned, and implemented the project in whole or in significant part.

5. Considering all input opportunities, which of the following statements are true (check all that apply):
a.The participants comprised a broadly representative sample of the population potentially benefiting from, or affected by, the project.
b. Project proponents identified key community leaders and organizations and engaged them directly. c. The events and input opportunities were hosted at varied and accessible times and locations throughout the area potentially affected by the project and included both in person and online forms of engagement. Events and written materials were offered in languages other than English. d. The participation process was conducted or assisted by a professional facilitator or public participation expert.
b.Solicited and recorded written or spoken input from the community about specific aspects of the project or potential project alternatives before decisions on those aspects and alternatives were finalized. c.Incorporated proposals or ideas from the community into project alternatives or components. d.Reported back to the community on how the input in 4(b) and 4(c) was incorporated. e. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by having one or more workshops or other meetings in which the community developed a project alternative or specific component to address unmet community needs, which was subsequently included in the project’s application for funding or final design.
f. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by formal cooperation with a community-based organization (i.e., via a memorandum of understanding, community benefits agreement, steering committee, labor agreement, etc.) to acquire or distribute funding, identify project alternatives or project components, or otherwise enhance community engagement in project design, planning and implementation.
g. Developed project features or project alternatives collaboratively with the community by delegation of authority to choose between project alternatives or components to the community through a steering committee, organized voting process, representative community-based organization, or other means. 2) With regard to public events held by the project proponent to discuss this project proposal with the community, what was the approximate total attendance at those events? 2000 3) With regard to other opportunities provided by the project proponent for community members to comment or provide input on the project, beyond those included in question 2, what is the approximate total number of people who provided commentary or input on the project through these opportunities?
420
4) Which of the following took place as part of the events & other opportunities identified? (Check all that apply):
a.Informed the community about various aspects of the project, including the process by which major decisions about the project would be made.
e. The project proponents, or those acting on their behalf, prepared and followed a community engagement plan that meets the minimum criteria originally established by the Transformative Climate Communities Program Priority Population Community Engagement: Identify the specific assessment for the Community Engagement Co-benefit (High, Medium, Low): Low
Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 9 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
Is the project located outside of a disadvantaged community, but within 1/2 mile of a disadvantage community and within a low-income census tract? Yes
Step 2 - Identify a Need: Review the options and select one that explains how the community or household need for the priority population identified in Step 1 was determined.

Priority Populations Community Needs Description: Describe the community or household need and how it was identified. If option “B. Local Documentation” was chosen, briefly describe the documentation. If option “C. Data Tools” was chosen, include the name of the tool in the description.

A. Direct Engagement: Engage local residents and community groups in meetings, workshops, or other opportunities as part of the planning process to identify community or household needs, and document how the engagement informed the design and/or selection of projects to address those needs.

Does your Agency's Service Area have a Disadvantaged Community? (as defined by SB 535) Yes Is the project located within the boundaries of a Disadvantaged Community census tract? Yes Is the project located within the boundaries of a Low-Income community census tract? Yes LCTOP FY 2025-2026 Allocation Request Cycle A
Priority Populations Benefits
Step 1 - Identify the Priority Population: Determine if the project is at least partially located within a Priority Population census track or will benefit Priority Population households.

Agency can meet the DAC requirement by meeting any of the SB 1119 Project Criteria:

Is the project a transit fare subsidies or network and fare integration technology improvements, including, but not limited to, discounted or free student transit passes No
Is the project a purchase of zero-emission transit buses and/or purchase and installation of supporting infrastructure?
No
Is the project a new or expanded transit service that connects with transit service serving a disadvantaged communities?
No
Amount of FY 25-26 funds to benefit Low-Income Community: $23,049 Amount of FY 25-26 fund to benefit Low-Income Households and Residents within 1/2 mile of a DAC: $23,048 Total Amount of FY 25-26 LCTOP funds to benefit Priority Population (Total should not exceed total FY 25-26 LCTOP project funding): $92,194 Delano Area Rapid Transit used a variety of approaches to determine community need ncluding referring to the list of common needs for disadvantaged communities in CARB's funding guidelines Table 2-2. Staff has worked with members of the community onmay occasions including public hearings, and community outreach. Community surveys specific to fixed-route riders and dial-a-ride customers, outreach to community stakeholders, and a bilingual online public comment mechanism have been done. Staff has participated in community events such as National Night Out, Veterans Parade, Family Night Out, Trunk or Treat, and Tour D'lights. We also used the General plan and the needs for transportation. The results of the survey were used to craft a profile of the typical fixed route rider: most Step 3 - Provide a Benefit:Review the options below and select one that demonstrates how the project directly benefits the priority population identified in Step 1 and addresses the need identified in Step 2.

Priority Population Benefit: Select the benefit
your project provides to the community or
household.

F. Project reduces the transportation cost burden.

Please provide the amount of FY 25-26 LCTOP funds estimated to benefit Priority Populations.

Amount of FY 25-26 funds to benefit a Disadvantage Community (If you have a DAC, at least 50% must benefit a DAC) : $46,097 Division of Local Assistance
Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Page 10 of 10
Sheet Name: Allocation_Request
Rev. 1-2026
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
Authorized Agent
AS THE City Manager
(Chief Executive Officer/Director/President/Secretary)
OF THE City of Delano
(Name of County/City/Transit Organization)
I hereby authorize the following individual(s) to execute for and on behalf of the named Regional Entity/Transit Operator, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds provided by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Local Assistance. I understand that if there is a change in the authorized agent, the project sponsor must submit a new form. This form is required even when the authorized agent is the executive authority himself. I understand the Board must provide a resolution approving the Authorized Agent. The Board Resolution appointing the Authorized Agent is attached.

Maribel Reyna, City Manager OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Click here to enter text. OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Click here to enter text. OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Click here to enter text. OR
(Name and Title of Authorized Agent)
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz Mayor
(Print Name) (Title)
(Signature)
Approved this 6
day
of April , 2026
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
Certifications and Assurances
Lead Agency: City of Delano
Project Title: Free and Reduced Fares
Prepared by: Viviana Alapisco, Transportation Manager
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has adopted the following Certifications and Assurances for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP).

As a condition of the receipt of LCTOP funds, Lead Agency must comply with these terms and conditions.

A. General

1. The Lead Agency agrees to abide by the current LCTOP Guidelines and applicable legal requirements.

2. The Lead Agency must submit to Caltrans a signed Authorized Agent form designating the representative who can submit documents on behalf of the project sponsor and a copy of the board resolution appointing the Authorized Agent.

B. Project Administration

1. The Lead Agency certifies that required environmental documentation is complete before requesting an allocation of LCTOP funds. The Lead Agency assures that projects approved for LCTOP funding comply with Public Resources Code § 21100 and § 21150.

2. The Lead Agency certifies that a dedicated bank account for LCTOP funds only will be established within 30 days of receipt of LCTOP funds.

3. The Lead Agency certifies that when LCTOP funds are used for a transit capital project, that the project will be completed and remain in operation for its useful life.

4. The Lead Agency certifies that it has the legal, financial, and technical capacity to carry out the project, including the safety and security aspects of that project.

5. The Lead Agency certifies that they will notify Caltrans of pending litigation, dispute, or negative audit findings related to the project, before receiving an allocation of funds.

6. The Lead Agency must maintain satisfactory continuing control over the use of project equipment and facilities and will adequately maintain project equipment and facilities for the useful life of the project.

7. Any interest the Lead Agency earns on LCTOP funds must be used only on approved LCTOP projects.

FY 2025-2026 LCTOP

8. The Lead Agency must notify Caltrans of any changes to the approved project with a Corrective Action Plan (CAP).

9. Under extraordinary circumstances, a Lead Agency may terminate a project prior to completion. In the event the Lead Agency terminates a project prior to completion, the Lead Agency must (1) contact Caltrans in writing and follow-up with a phone call verifying receipt of such notice; (2) pursuant to verification, submit a final report indicating the reason for the termination and demonstrating the expended funds were used on the intended purpose; (3) submit a request to reassign the funds to a new project within 180 days of termination.

C. Reporting

1. The Lead Agency must submit the following LCTOP reports:
a. Annual Project Activity Reports October 30th each year. b. A Close Out Report within six months of project completion. c. The annual audit required under the Transportation Development Act (TDA), to verify receipt and appropriate expenditure of LCTOP funds. A copy of the audit report must be submitted to Caltrans within six months of the close of the year (December 31) each year in which LCTOP funds have been received or expended.
d. Project Outcome Reporting as defined by CARB Funding Guidelines. e. Jobs Reporting as defined by CARB Funding Guidelines.

2. Other Reporting Requirements: CARB develops and revises Funding Guidelines that will include reporting requirements for all State agencies that receive appropriations from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Caltrans and project sponsors will need to submit reporting information in accordance with CARB’s Funding Guidelines, including reporting on greenhouse gas reductions and benefits to disadvantaged communities.

D. Cost Principles

1. The Lead Agency agrees to comply with Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations 225 (2 CFR 225), Cost Principles for State and Local Government, and 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.

2. The Lead Agency agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that:
a. Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allow ability of individual project cost items and
FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
b. Those parties shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub-recipient receiving LCTOP funds as a contractor or sub-contractor shall comply with
Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments.

3. Any project cost for which the Lead Agency has received funds that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR 225, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 or 2 CFR, Part 200, are subject to repayment by the Lead Agency to the State of California (State). All projects must reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as required under Public Resources Code section 75230, and any project that fails to reduce greenhouse gases shall also have its project costs submit to repayment by the Lead Agency to the State. Should the Lead Agency fail to reimburse moneys due to the State within thirty (30) days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed in writing between the Parties hereto, the State is authorized to intercept and withhold future payments due the Lead Agency from the State or any third-party source, including but not limited to, the State Treasurer and the State Controller.

A. Record Retention

1. The Lead Agency agrees and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred project costs and matching funds by line item for the project.

The accounting system of the Lead Agency, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion. All accounting records and other supporting papers of the Lead Agency, its contractors and subcontractors connected with LCTOP funding shall be maintained for a minimum of three (3) years after the “Project Closeout” report or final Phase 2 report is submitted (per CARB Funding Guidelines, Vol. 3, page 3.A-16), and shall be held open to inspection, copying, and audit by representatives of the State and the California State Auditor.

Copies thereof will be furnished by the Lead Agency, its contractors, and subcontractors upon receipt of any request made by the State or its agents. In conducting an audit of the costs claimed, the State will rely to the maximum extent possible on any prior audit of the Lead Agency pursuant to the provisions of federal and State law. In the absence of such an audit, any acceptable audit work performed by the Lead Agency’s external and internal auditors may be relied upon and used by the State when planning and conducting additional audits.

2. For the purpose of determining compliance with Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with FY 2025-2026 LCTOP
the performance of the Lead Agency’s contracts with third parties pursuant to Government Code § 8546.7, the project sponsor, its contractors and subcontractors and the State shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire project period and for three (3) years from the date of final payment. The State, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of the State, shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to a project for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and the Lead Agency shall furnish copies thereof if requested.

3. The Lead Agency, its contractors and subcontractors will permit access to all records of employment, employment advertisements, employment application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the Civil Rights Department, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the State, for the purpose of any investigation to ascertain compliance with this document.

F. Special Situations
Caltrans may perform an audit and/or request detailed project information of the project sponsor’s LCTOP funded projects at Caltrans’ discretion at any time prior to the completion of the LCTOP.

I certify all these conditions will be met.

Maribel Reyna City Manager
(Print Authorized Agent) (Title)
04/06/2026
(Signature) (Date)
RESOLUTION 2026-

AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE

CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES AND AUTHORIZED AGENT FORMS

FOR THE LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM (LCTOP)
FOR THE FOLLOWING PROJECT(S):

FREE AND REDUCED FARES IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,194
WHEREAS, the City of Delano, Delano Area Rapid Transit (DART) is an eligible project sponsor and may receive state funding from the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) for transit projects; and
WHEREAS, the statutes related to state-funded transit projects require a local or regional implementing agency to abide by various regulations; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 862 (2014) named the Department of Transportation (Department) as the administrative agency for the LCTOP; and
WHEREAS, the Department has developed guidelines for the purpose of administering and distributing LCTOP funds to eligible project sponsors (local agencies); and WHEREAS, the City of Delano, Delano Area Rapid Transit (DART) wishes to delegate authorization to execute these documents and any amendments there to Maribel Reyna, City Manager; and
WHEREAS, City of Delano Transit has been approved LCTOP funds in the amount of $92,194; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for City Council to approve utilizing the LCTOP funds for fiscal year 25/26 in the amount of $92,194 for an operations project to offer free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on-demand; and
WHEREAS, the City of Delano Transit wishes to implement the LCTOP project(s) listed as follows:

Project Name:

Free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on-demand Amount of LCTOP funds requested:
$92,194
Short description of project:

Project will allow DART to offer free fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on-demand throughout the year to encourage ridership and promote public transportation Benefit to a Priority Populations:

Disadvantaged Community (DAC), Low-Income Community (LIC), Low-Income Community/Household (LICH)
Amount to benefit Priority Populations:
$92,194
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as follows

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby authorizes the City of Delano Transit to utilize the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds to offer free and reduced fares for fixed routes, dial-a-ride and on-demand in the amount of $92,194.

3. THAT STAFF hereby recommends to the City Council that it ADOPT the proposed resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Delano at a regular meeting held on the 6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________
Ricardo G. Chavez, City Clerk
Agency Project Description 99313 99314 Total apportionment Project Amount Arvin
$33,653.11 $725 $34,378
California City
$22,418.01 $300 $22,718
Delano $88,936.38 $3,258 $92,194
GET $957,671.68 $68,572 $1,026,244
Kern Transit
$264,395.14 $13,927 $278,322
McFarland
$23,926.35 $142 $24,068
Ridgecrest
$47,785.36 $1,856 $49,641
Shafter $39,484.00 $671 $40,155
Taft $11,930.35 $4,198 $16,128
Tehachapi $19,319 $329 $19,648
Wasco
$44,164.34 $371 $44,535
Estimated Regional Totals $1,553,684 $94,349 $1,648,033 Attachment A: FY 2025-2026 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Apportionment & Program of Projects

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 10
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Noemi A. Zamudio, Human Resources Director
SUBJECT: Authorize City Manager to Execute Agreements for the City’s Health Plans for the Period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 Recommendation
Staff recommends renewal with all existing Health Carriers and authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate agreements with all carriers listed below.

1. Renew with Kaiser and Blue Shield for the City’s medical plans.

2. Renew with Superior Vision for the City’s vision plan.

3. Renew with Lincoln Financial Group for the City’s life and accidental plan.

4. Renew with CPI for the City’s flexible spending account.

Discussion
The City’s health contracts are set to expire on June 30, 2026. The City’s broker, Kibble & Prentice, a USI company, negotiated the July 1, 2026 health plan renewals. The current medical trend for rate increases are between 10% to 13%.

Medical Plan:

Staff recommends to renew with Kaiser. The renewal rate for Kaiser is as follows:

Traditional HMO Plan 3.6%
Staff recommends renewal with Blue Shield. The renewal rates are as follows:

Trio 10.9%
HMO 12.8%
PPO 12.8%
Dental Plan:

The dental contract with Sun Life Dental was executed in March and will expire in June 2027.

Vision Plan:

Staff recommends renewal with Superior Vision. Superior Vision is offering a four year rate guarantee.

Life and Accidental Plan:

Staff recommends renewing with Lincoln Financial Group. This will be the last year of a rate guarantee.

Flexible Spending Plan:

The flexible spending plan sometimes referred to as cafeteria plans or Section 125 plan, allows an employee to set aside up to $3,400 (Medical Expenses) and $7,500 (Dependent Care Expenses) per fiscal year through payroll deductions on a pre-taxed bases. During the fiscal year employees may use these monies for reimbursement of expenses such as healthcare and dependent daycare. When they use tax-free dollars to pay for these expenses, they realize an increase in their spending power and a substantial tax savings.

Reimbursement funds are administered through CPI. Staff was able to secure a rate pass.

There is an administration fee of $4 per participant per month and an annual standard compliance fee of $250.00.

Budget Impact
Annual budget increase for the renewals is about $68,824, total budget for FY 2026/27 $1,028,107.

Attachment(s)
Medical Increases for past two years
Medical Inreases for past two years
Proposed
2024 2025 2026
Blue Shield - Trio HMO - EE only 6.99% 6.10% 10.90%
Blue Shield - Trio HMO - Family 6.99% 6.10% 10.90%
Blue Shield - HMO High - EE only 13.90% 8% 12.80%
Blue Shield - HMO High - Family 13.90% 8% 12.80%
Blue Shield - PPO - EE only 13.90% 8% 12.80%
Blue Shield - PPO - Family 13.90% 8% 12.80%
Kaiser HMO- EE only 12.46% 4.72% 3.60%
Kaiser HMO - Family 12.46% 4.72% 3.60%
Sun Life Dental N/A
Superior Vision Rate pass Rate pass Rate pass
Lincoln Financial - Life & AD&D Rate pass 4% Rate pass
Monthly Premiums Proposed Proposed
Blue Shield 2024 2025 2026
Trio HMO - Emp Only 613.96 651.25 708.59
Trio HMO - Family 1687.98 1790.48 1948.14
HMO High - Emp Only 923.56 977 1104.02
HMO High - Family 2632.13 2841.46 3146.44
PPO - Emp Only 1067.56 1152.46 1276.16
PPO - Family 3042.53 3284.48 3637.07
Proposed Proposed
Kaiser - Traditional HMO 2024 2025 2026
Emp only 1165.58 1220.59 1264.48
Family 1748.37 1830.88 1896.72
Proposed Proposed
Sun Life Dental Proposed Proposed
DHMO 2025 2026
Emp Only 14.77 N/A
Emp + Sp 26.47 N/A
Emp + Ch 37.74 N/A
Family 44.13 N/A
EPO 2025
Emp Only 19.87 N/A
Emp + Sp 40.67 N/A
Emp + Ch 51.13 N/A
Family 72.51 N/A
PPO 2025
Emp Only 32.04 N/A
Emp + Sp 65.62 N/A
Emp + Ch 74.91 N/A
Family 110.68 N/A
Proposed Proposed
Superior Vision 2024 2025 2026
Emp Only 8.39 8.39 8.39
Family 21.08 21.08 2108.00%
Proposed Proposed
Lincoln Financial - Life & AD&D 2024 2025 2026
.18/1000 .186/1000 .186/1000
Premium = .18 cents per 1000 of annual salary
Benefit = One times the annual salary with a minium of $30,000; maximum of $150,000

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 11
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Brandon Rodriguez, PE, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Second Reading and adoption of an Ordinance Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes in a Community Facilities District.

Staff Recommends the City Council take the following actions:

1. Perform second reading by title only and adopt City Council Ordinance No. 2026-___ Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes in a Community Facilities District (the “Ordinance).

Discussion
The City uses Community Facilities Districts1 (“CFD”s) as the financing mechanism for maintenance and services of improvements related to new development. This will be the fourth CFD formed by the City to pay for these specific maintenance services. The developer has provided funds for the establishment of the Community Facilities District.

The City’s special tax consultant, NBS, has prepared the attached Ordinance, which authorizes the levy of special taxes in CFD No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2). The special taxes may be levied within the CFD beginning in Fiscal Year 2026/27. The property included in the CFD is the Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2 project, consisting of one large lot parcel that will be developed into 164 residential units. The initial special tax rate is $378.00 per unit, which will increase annually by no more than 5.0% per year.

The Ordinance follows a noticed public hearing, successful ballot tabulation, adoption of the Resolution Establishing the CFD, and the first reading of the Ordinance all conducted on March 16, 2026.

Budget Impact
Costs associated with consultant services related to the CFD formation are paid by the developer.

The annual levy and collection of special taxes and CFD administration will be charged to the CFD.

Attachments: Ordinance No. 2026-___ Authorizing the Levy of Special Taxes in a Community Facilities District
1 Gov Code §53311-53368.3
ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF DELANO, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF

SPECIAL TAXES IN A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

CITY OF DELANO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2026-1
(FOXWOOD 2 & WRENWOOD 2)
WHEREAS, this City Council of the City of Delano (the “City Council”) on February 2, 2026, adopted Resolution No. 2026-07 entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of City of Delano, Declaring its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes” (the “Resolution of Intention”) has conducted proceedings (the “Proceedings”) to establish the City of Delano Community Facilities District No. 2026-1 (Foxwood 2 & Wrenwood 2) (the “District”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Sections 53311 and following, California Government Code; hereafter referred to as the “Act”) provide for the costs of landscaping, street lighting, park, and sump maintenance, operation, and servicing and appurtenant facilities (the “Services) as provided in the Act; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing to be held on March 16, 2026, and as part of the Proceedings, the City Council held a public hearing under the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax (the “Special Tax”) to be levied within the District to finance the Services and at such hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of the Special Tax were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this City Council and a full and fair hearing was held; and
WHEREAS, upon the conclusion of the hearing, this City Council adopted a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of City of Delano, Establishing the Formation of a Community Facilities District” (the “Resolution of Formation”), whereby the City Council (i) established the District, (ii) authorized the levy of the Special Tax within the District, and (iii) preliminarily established an appropriations limit for the District, all pursuant to the Act; and
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2026, a special election was held among the landowner voters within the District at which the landowner voters approved the proposition relating to the levy of Special Taxes within the District and the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District by the two-thirds vote required by the Act, which approval has been confirmed by resolution of this City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council ordered the recordation with the County Recorder of the County of Kern of a Notice of Special Tax Lien (the “Notice”).

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Delano, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council hereby authorizes and levies the Special Tax within the District pursuant to the Act, at the rate and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of Special Tax set forth in the Resolution of Formation, which rate and method is by this reference incorporated herein. The Special Tax is hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2026/27 and in each fiscal year thereafter to pay for the Services for the District and all costs of administering the District, as contemplated by the Resolution of Formation and the Proceedings.

3. The Director of Finance of the City of Delano or designee or employee or consultant of the City of Delano is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific Special Tax to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation.

4. Exemptions from the levy of the Special Tax shall be as provided in the Resolution of Formation and the applicable provisions of the Act. In no event shall the Special Tax be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum Special Tax specified in the Resolution of Formation.

5. All of the collections of the Special Tax shall be used as provided in the Act and in the Resolution of Formation, including, but not limited to, the payment of the costs of the Services, the payment of the costs of the City of Delano in administering the District, and the costs of collecting and administering the Special Tax.

6. The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected and shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, that the City Council may provide for other appropriate methods of collection by resolution(s) of the City Council. The Director of Finance of the City of Delano is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of Kern in order to effect proper billing and collection of the Special Tax, so that the Special Tax shall be included on the secured property tax roll of the County of Kern for fiscal year 2026/27 and for each fiscal year thereafter until no longer required to pay for the Services or until otherwise terminated by the City of Delano.

7. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the Special Tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the Special Tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected.

8. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published immediately after its passage at least once in a newspaper of general circulation.

9. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from the date of final passage.

INTRODUCED and first read on the 16th day of March, 2026; and PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2026.

DATED:

ROLL CALL:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 12
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Brandon Rodriguez, PE, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of a Task Order to Agreement No. 2021-45 with QK Inc. for $210,000.00 to provide environmental support services for the High Street Flyover Project, and authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to sign any documents needed to carry out this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Task Order to Agreement No. 2021-45 with QK, Inc. for $210,000.00 to provide environmental support services for the High Street Flyover Project, and authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to sign any documents needed to carry out this project.

DISCUSSION
On October 20, 2025, the city council approved the cooperative agreement 06-1844 EA 06-1J930 with Caltrans for the High Street Flyover Project.

Currently, staff is seeking environmental support services for the project to obtain Project Study Report (PSR) approval from Caltrans. QK has demonstrated considerable current and past working experience in environmental compliance on similar projects. The firm has professional staff capable of providing all services necessary for the completion of the project of this scope and size.

QK will provide California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) support services for the proposed construction of a flyover across State Route (SR)-99 within the City of Delano between High Street on the east side and the intersection of Morse Boulevard and Dover Parkway. This effort will support the High Street Flyover Project Cooperative Agreement No. 06-1844 EA 06-1J930 in obtaining PSR approval from Caltrans.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff recommends that a Task Order to Agreement No. 2021-45 be approved with a budget of $210,000.00 and authorization be given to the City Manager, or her designee, to sign the agreement and any other documents needed to complete the project. Staff is requesting a new appropriation of $210,000.00 from the Traffic Impact Fee Fund budget (for state projects) under account 155- 55524-234-000000 (Professional Services) to pay for these environmental support services.

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 13
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Miguel Angel Fernandez, Economic Development Specialist SUBJECT: Request Approval of Fee Schedule for Use of City Equipment and Staff Costs for Non-City Events

RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a fee schedule for the use of City-owned equipment and staff costs for non-City events.

DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND
The City has recently received an increasing number of requests from private entities for the use of City owned equipment and staff support for events, including podiums, sound systems, tables, chairs, tents, and related materials. The City currently does not have a formal policy or fee schedule governing these requests.

City staff costs include delivery, setup, breakdown, and coordination, resulting in staff time, vehicle use, fuel costs, and equipment wear and tear. Based on market estimates for similar events, a typical request requires approximately two (2) hours for two (2) staff members for loading, delivery, setup, breakdown, and return of equipment, as well as one (1) hour of supervisor time to coordinate logistics and scheduling.

Hourly staff rates begin at approximately $21.99 per hour, with actual costs varying depending on employee classification. In addition, a City work truck with trailer is required to transport equipment to and from the event location, at an estimated operational cost of $30.00 per hour.

Depending on event size and complexity, requests may require multiple staff members across departments, resulting in the reallocation of personnel from core service duties.

To better understand the market value of similar equipment, staff reviewed rental rates from Walker Lewis Rents, a local equipment rental provider. Sample daily rental rates include:
• Podium: approximately $90/day
• Portable sound system: approximately $125/day
• Tables: approximately $8.75 per table
• Chairs: approximately $1.50 per chair
These rates do not include delivery, setup, or labor, which are typically charged separately.

In order to recover City costs and not provide a gift of public funds, it is recommended that Council provides a fee schedule with a CPI to keep up with costs.

As the frequency of these requests continues to grow, staff believes it is appropriate to seek Council direction regarding the establishment of a formal policy and fee structure to ensure consistency, transparency and responsible stewardship of City resources.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact will depend on the fee structure adopted by the City Council.

Attachments

1. Exhibit A - Fee Schedule

2. Resolution
Exhibit A
City of Delano
PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE – USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND STAFF SUPPORT A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The following fees apply to the use of City-owned equipment and City staff support for non-City events.

All equipment is subject to availability and City operational needs.

Requests must be submitted for a minimum of twenty (20) business days prior to the date of the event.

Additional fees may apply for damages, excessive cleaning, or late return of equipment.

A refundable security deposit may be required, as determined by the City.

B. EQUIPMENT RENTAL FEES (SUBSIDIZED COMMUNITY RATE)
Equipment Unit Fee
Podium Per event $90
Portable Sound System (Mic, Speaker, extension cords,
accessories, etc.)
Per event $125
Table (6–8 ft) Per table $8.75
Chair Per chair $1.50
C. STAFF SUPPORT FEES
Service Unit Fee
Staff Time (Setup, Breakdown,
Transport)
Per hour
(2 hour
minimum)
Hourly rate based on assigned staff
classification (fully burdened rate)
Supervisor/Coordinator Time Per hour Hourly rate based on assigned staff classification (fully burdened rate)
After-Hours Support (if
applicable)
Per hour Hourly rate based on assigned staff
classification (fully burdened rate)
D. FEE WAIVERS AND REDUCTIONS
Fees may be waived or reduced by the City Manager or designee for:
- City-sponsored events
- City co-sponsored events
- Non-profit organizations
- Events determined to provide a significant public benefit E. ADDITIONAL TERMS
The City reserves the right to deny requests based on resource availability or operational conflicts.

The requesting party may be required to provide proof of insurance naming the City as an additional insured.

All fees are subject to annual adjustment in accordance with the Consumer Price Index (CPI), as authorized by City Council resolution.

F. EFFECTIVE DATE
This fee schedule shall become effective upon approval by the City Council and/or implementation by the City Manager or designee, consistent with City policy.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO

ESTABLISHING A POLICY FOR THE USE OF CITY-OWNED EQUIPMENT AND

STAFF SUPPORT FOR NON-CITY EVENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT A FEE STRUCTURE WITH AN ANNUAL CPI

ADJUSTMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Delano periodically receives requests from private entities and outside agencies for the use of City-owned equipment and staff support for events, including but not limited to podiums, sound systems, tables, chairs, tents, and related materials; and WHEREAS, the City currently does not have a formal policy or fee schedule governing such requests;
WHEREAS, the provision of City equipment and staff support requires the use of City resources, including staff time, vehicles, fuel, and equipment, resulting in costs to the General Fund; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to promote consistency, transparency, and responsible stewardship of public resources while continuing to support community events and activities; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it appropriate to establish a policy framework and authorize the implementation of a subsidized fee structure to allow for cost recovery; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Delano, California, does authorize and determine as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council hereby establishes a fee policy for the use of City-owned equipment and staff support for non-City events.

SECTION 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to implement a fee structure for the use of City equipment and staff support, including but not limited to equipment rental, delivery, setup, breakdown, and staff time.

SECTION 3. The fee structure shall be designed to allow for full cost recovery for events, as determined appropriate by the City Manager.

SECTION 4. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to approve, deny, or condition requests for the use of City equipment and staff support based on availability of resources, operational needs, and consistency with this policy.

SECTION 5. CPI ADJUSTMENT. Beginning one (1) year following the adoption of the initial fee structure, and annually thereafter, all fees established pursuant to this Resolution may be adjusted by the Finance Director, or designee, in accordance with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the West Region, as published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, or a comparable index if such index is discontinued. Any such adjustments shall not exceed the percentage change in CPI for the preceding twelve (12) month period.

SECTION 6. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to make minor administrative adjustments to the fee structure and associated procedures as necessary to effectively implement this policy.

SECTION 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: ________________________________
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 14
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Pedro Nuñez, PE, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Report on the Status of the Local Emergency regarding the failed Sewer Main located on 1000 High Street Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050

RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive and file the report from the Public Works Director, pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050(c)(1).

2. Adopt a motion, by four-fifths vote, declaring that there is a need to continue emergency actions, pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050(c)(2).

3. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION/BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 20168, the City Council, declared on January 20, 2026, that public interest and necessity demanded the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property because of an emergency. The ongoing local emergency concerns the replacement of the sewer main located on the 1000 block of High St.

Pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050(c)(1), the City Council must thereafter review this emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the work described above is completed. Public Contracts Code § 22050(c)(2) requires that, by a four-fifths vote, the Council determines there is a need to continue emergency actions. As of the date of this report, there is a need to continue actions related to the local emergency because the repairs are approximately 70% complete.

FISCAL IMPACT
As originally stated in the emergency resolution a new appropriation of $350,000.00 from the Sewer Fund was approved to cover this expense.

City of Delano
City Council Staff Report
April 6, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Pedro Nuñez, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Introduction of an Ordinance Adding a New Chapter 13.06 to the Delano Municipal Code to Prohibit and Enforce Water Theft, Unauthorized Water Use and an Unauthorized Connection to a Fire Hydrant, as Allowed by State Law, and Amending Two Sections of Chapter 13.04 to Reference the New Chapter and Update the Code

RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the City Council take the following actions:

1. Waive first reading and introduce an Ordinance prohibiting and enforcing water theft, unauthorized water use and an unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant;

2. Schedule second reading of the ordinance at the City Council’s next regular meeting; or

3. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

BACKGROUND
The City of Delano is a local agency that provides retail water services directly to its customers.

The unauthorized connection to and use of a fire hydrant and unauthorized use of a fire hydrant meter to take water from a fire hydrant constitutes “water theft,” under state law and undermines the local water system process. Unauthorized connections to fire hydrants can lead to public health and safety issues, including potential contamination of a drinking water source due to a lack of backflow prevention and damage to water system facilities and infrastructure, or depressurization of the water system, which could make Agenda Item: 15
April 6, 2026

Delano communities more vulnerable in the event of a fire. In addition, the affordability of water is negatively impacted by water theft from a fire hydrant as the cost of water loss and damages to infrastructure is ultimately borne by ratepayers.

Existing state law penalizes the theft of utility services, including water, as a misdemeanor (Penal Code §§ 498, 624, 625). In addition, state law allows the City to bring a civil action for damages related to water theft, including against any person who diverts water service or tampers with any City-owned property to provide water services (Civil Code § 1882 et seq.).

In addition to existing law, the State Legislature has also authorized the City to adopt an ordinance that prohibits water theft and makes a violation of the ordinance subject to an administrative fine or penalty (Gov. Code §§53069.45 and 54069.46). This means that violations of water theft can be enforced by the issuance of citations by the City’s Code Enforcement officials. The ordinance must set forth the administrative procedure for imposing and enforcing the fines and must also establish a process for granting a hardship waiver to reduce the amount of the fine. Importantly, state law allows the City to issue citations in addition to criminal and civil penalties.

The following are the maximum fine amounts allowed by state law:

Violation Maximum Fine Amounts (per
state law)
State Law Authority
Water theft is committed via
meter tampering in violation of
proposed ordinance
First violation: $130
Second violation within one
year of first violation: $700
Third violation and each
additional violation: $1,300
Gov. Code §
53069.45(b)
All other forms of water theft
in violation of proposed
ordinance
First violation: $1,000
Second violation within one
year of first violation: $2,000
Third violation and each
additional violation: $3,000
Gov. Code §
53069.45(c)
Water theft committed via the
unauthorized connection to a
fire hydrant in violation of
proposed ordinance
First violation: $2,500
Second violation within one
year of first violation: $5,000
Third violation and each
additional violation: $10,000
Gov. Code §
53069.46(b)
Note: According to state law, a fine may only be issued pursuant to either Government Code § 53069.45 or § 53069.46 (but not both) for the same offense.

April 6, 2026

DISCUSSION
To exercise the City’s authority under the new state law, staff has prepared the attached proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance prohibits water theft, unauthorized water use and unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant. The ordinance also sets forth the administrative procedure for imposing and enforcing the fines and establishes a process for granting a hardship waiver to reduce the amount of the fine.

If introduced by the City Council, the ordinance will be scheduled for second reading and adoption at the Council’s next regular meeting. If adopted, the ordinance will take effect 30 days after adoption.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
None required.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and State CEQA guidelines (Sections 15000 et seq.) the ordinance is exempt from environmental review under CEQA because it is an action taken by a regulatory agency as authorized by state law to assure the maintenance of a natural resource, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15307. Further, the ordinance is not a “project” and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance in question may have a significant effect on the environment, either directly or indirectly, and that therefore no environmental review under the CEQA is required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

ATTACHMENT
Proposed Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 2026 -

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DELANO, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 13.06 TO

THE DELANO MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT AND ENFORCE

WATER THEFT, UNAUTHORIZED WATER USE AND

UNAUTHORIZED CONNECTION TO A FIRE HYDRANT, AS

ALLOWED BY STATE LAW, AND AMENDING TWO SECTIONS
OF CHAPTER 13.04 TO REFERENCE THE NEW CHAPTER AND

UPDATE THE CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Delano is a local agency that provides retail water services directly to its customers;
WHEREAS, the unauthorized connection to and use of a fire hydrant and unauthorized use of a fire hydrant meter to take water from a fire hydrant constitutes “water theft,” under state law and undermines the local water system process; WHEREAS, unauthorized connections to fire hydrants can lead to public health and safety issues, including potential contamination of a drinking water source due to a lack of backflow prevention and damage to water system facilities and infrastructure, or depressurization of the water system, which could make communities more vulnerable in the event of a fire;
WHEREAS, the affordability of water is impacted by water theft from a fire hydrant as the cost of water loss and damages to infrastructure is ultimately borne by ratepayers;
WHEREAS, state law penalizes the theft of utility services, including water, as a misdemeanor (Penal Code §§ 498, 624, 625); in addition, state law allows the City to seek civil damages for water theft violations (Civ. Code § 1882.1); WHEREAS, the California Constitution provides that a city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general law;
WHEREAS, the City’s Code has a “Code Enforcement” chapter that outlines the process for issuing administrative citations and has an appeal procedure (Delano Muni.

Code §§ 1.08.150 et seq.)
WHEREAS, in 2021 and 2025, the State Legislature adopted laws that allow the City to adopt an ordinance prohibiting water theft, unauthorized water use and unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant and that makes water theft violations subject to a civil administrative fine or penalty (Gov. Code §§ 53069.45 and 54069.46); and 2 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to protect ratepayers and keep the cost of water as affordable as possible, and desires to conserve water and protect public health and safety, by enacting such ordinances allowed by state law.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO,
CALIFONIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council for the City of Delano finds and declares the foregoing are true and correct and incorporates said recitals fully into this Ordinance as substantive findings.

SECTION 2. Section 13.04.130 of the Delano Municipal Code (DMC) is hereby amended as follows (deletions in strikethrough and additions in double underline):

13.04.130 – Rules for use.

No one shall, in any manner whatsoever, tap, meddle or interfere with any part of the water system of the city. No one shall use water supplied by the city for any other purpose than that described in the city in the application for service, or in any way supply water to other persons other than those living on the property described in the application. A violation of this section constitutes unauthorized water use, as described in Chapter 13.06 of this Code.

SECTION 3. Chapter 13.04, “Water Charges – Regulations,” of the DMC is hereby amended to add the following section:
“13.04.135 – Use of fire hydrants.

All fire hydrants connected to the city’s water system shall be operated only by the city, the Kern County Fire Department, or a person who has been duly issued a permit to do so by the city. Any person desiring to use water through any city fire hydrant must comply with all applicable water rates, rules and regulations. A violation of this section constitutes an unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant, as described in Chapter 13.06 of this Code.”
SECTION 4. Title 13, “Water, Sewage and Refuse” of the DMC is hereby amended to add the following chapter:
“Chapter 13.06 - WATER THEFT AND UNAUTHORIZED WATER
USE

13.060.010 – Authorization.

This chapter is adopted pursuant to California Government Code sections 3 53069.45 and 53069.46, as those sections may be amended from time to time.

13.06.020 – Definitions.

The following definitions shall apply to this chapter:

A. “Water theft” means an action to divert, tamper, or reconnect water utility services.

B. “Divert” means to change the intended course or path of water without the authorization or consent of the utility.

C. “Tamper” means to rearrange, injure, alter, interfere with, or otherwise prevent from performing a normal or customary function.

D. “Reconnection” means the reconnection of water service by a customer or other person after service has been lawfully disconnected by the utility.

E. “Unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant” includes, but is not limited to, the following scenarios:
(1) the unauthorized use of a City-owned fire hydrant, fire hydrant meter, or fire detector check;
(2) The use of water from a City-owned fire hydrant for any use other than fire suppression, except where a permit has been duly issued by the City, for temporary service;
(3) Any use of a City-owned hydrant in violation of the terms and conditions of a hydrant permit.

F. “Unauthorized water use” includes, but is not limited to, the following scenarios:
(1) Meter tampering;
(2) The use of water from a stationary service connection where lawful water service has not been established or has been disconnected by the utility;
(3) The use of water supplied by the city for any other purpose than that described in the city in the application for service, or in any way supplying water to other persons other than those living on the property described in the application, as described in Section

13.04.130 of this Code.

G. “Person” and “responsible party” have the same meanings as defined in Section 1.08.160 of this Code.

13.06.030 -- Water theft, unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant, 4 and unauthorized water use prohibited.

Unauthorized use and improper connection to either a fire hydrant or the water system can lead to public health and safety issues, including potential contamination of a drinking water source due to a lack of backflow prevention and damage to water system facilities and infrastructure, or depressurization of the water system, which could make communities more vulnerable in the event of a fire. In addition, the affordability of water is impacted by water theft as the cost of water loss and damages to infrastructure is ultimately borne by ratepayers. As such, water theft, an unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant, and unauthorized water use, as such terms are defined in this chapter, are hereby prohibited.

13.06.040 – Administrative penalties.

A. In addition to any remedy available at law, any person or responsible party in violation of any provision of this chapter is subject to the issuance of an administrative citation pursuant to Chapter 1.08 of this Code, except that the fine shall be as provided in this section.

B. Fines. Administrative citations shall be accompanied by a fine as follows:
(1) For water theft and unauthorized water use via meter tampering, fines shall be as stated in Government Code section 53069.45. (2) For water theft committed via the unauthorized connection to a fire hydrant, fines shall be as stated in Government Code section 53069.46.
(3) For all other forms of water theft not described in either subsection (1) or (2), violations shall be as stated in Government Code section 53069.45.
(4) A fine may only be issued pursuant to either Government Code section 53069.45 or section 53069.46 (but not both) for the same offense.

C. Each day a violation of this chapter continues to exist shall constitute a new, separate, and distinct violation.

D. Appeals and hardship waivers. Administrative citations issued for violations of this chapter may be appealed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1.08 of this Code. In addition to any other order authorized by Chapter 1.08, an Administrative Hearing Officer may reduce or eliminate the fine upon a showing by the responsible party that payment of the full amount of the fine would impose an undue financial burden on the responsible party.

13.06.050 – Responsibility for water costs.
5 A. A person who has violated this chapter shall be liable for the costs of the estimated volume of water used, as determined by the Department of Public Works, charged at the then current appliable water rate adopted by the City Council.

B. Costs imposed by this chapter are in addition to any other costs that may be recovered under this Code, including but not limited to those costs authorized by Chapter 1.08.

C. Water costs assessed in accordance with this chapter may be billed in accordance with the usual billing practices of the Department of Public Works, where the responsible party is a customer of record. If the responsible party is not a customer of record, an invoice for payment may be served in the same manner as provided in Chapter 1.08 of this Code.

13.06.060 – Cumulative remedies; severability.

A. The remedies available in this chapter shall be cumulative with any other available remedy and in addition to any other remedy available at law or equity. The pursuit of one or more remedies by the City shall not bar the use of any other remedy for the purpose of enforcement of this chapter.

B. In addition to seeking all remedies available under any other law, the City may also seek civil damages for a violation of this section pursuant to Section 1882.1 of the Civil Code.

C. If any phrase, section, sentence, or word of this ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other phrase, section, sentence, or word of the ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid phrase, section, sentence, or word, and to this end each phrase, section, sentence, or word of this ordinance is declared to be severable.”
SECTION 5. Section 13.04.020 (“Rates”) of the DMC is hereby amended as follows:
“A. Flat Rates. The regular monthly rates to be charged consumers of water furnished by the city for un-metered properties within the corporate limits of the city may be established by resolution or ordinance of the city council.

A.B. Metered Rates. The regular monthly rates to be charged consumers of water furnished by the city for metered properties within the corporate limits of the city may be established by resolution or ordinance of the city 6 council.

B.C. Senior Citizens’ Discount. Individuals sixty years of age or older, who own and reside in their own home, shall be eligible for a fifteen percent discount on their regular monthly flat rate or metered rate service fee for that property.

The following steps must be completed and an application approved by the city in order to obtain the fifteen percent discount:

1. Complete senior citizens’ discount card application and sign it;

2. Return application to City Hall (1015 11th Avenue);

3. Show some type of identification to prove their age to utility billing when turning in application;

4. Provide property taxes or deed of trust, to prove that applicant is the home owner.

The discount will go into effect on the next monthly billing after approval of the application. In order to continue to receive the senior discount, individuals will be required to submit on an annual basis by July 1st an updated application to the utility billing department. The ability of funding the senior discount is dependent on the availability of Measure I funds.”
SECTION 6. Environmental Assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and State CEQA guidelines (Sections 15000 et seq.) the ordinance is exempt from environmental review under CEQA because it is an action taken by a regulatory agency as authorized by state law to assure the maintenance of a natural resource, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15307. Further, the ordinance is not a “project” and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance in question may have a significant effect on the environment, either directly or indirectly, and that therefore no environmental review under the CEQA is required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.

SECTION 9. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance causing it to be posted as required by law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 2026.
7 __________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
________________________________
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mark Hensley, City Attorney
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 16
SUBJECT: Authorize Amendment to City Manager's Contract Providing a City Contribution of 4% of City Manager's Annual Salary Towards a Deferred Compensation or Similar Retirement Benefit Plan
Recommendation

1. Authorize the City Attorney to draft an amendment to City Manager's contract providing for a yearly City contribution of 4% of her annual salary towards a deferred compensation plan or similar retirement benefit plan.

2. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

Discussion
The City Manager has continued to meet the annual performance goals established by the City Council and perform her role in a professional manner. Accordingly, it is recommended that Council authorize an amendment to her employment contract to provide for a yearly City contribution of 4% of her annual salary towards a deferred compensation or similar retirement program.

Budget/Fiscal Impact:

Approximately $10,990 annually.

CITY OF DELANO

STAFF REPORT
April 6, 2026
Agenda Item: 17
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Maribel Reyna, City Manager
By: Brandon Rodriguez, PE, City Engineer
By: Jerry Nicholson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Introduction and first reading of an ordinance amending sections 10.16.200 (Procedures establishing parking zones), 10.16.210 (Parking zones established) and

10.16.220 (Parking more than two hours prohibited) of the Delano Municipal Code and finding the ordinance exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Find that revisions to Delano Municipal Code (DMC) sections 10.16.200, 10.16.210, and 10.16.220 are necessary to address downtown parking enforcement.

2. Introduce an ordinance amending sections 10.16.200 (Procedures establishing parking zones),

10.16.210 (Parking zones established) and 10.16.220 (Parking more than two hours prohibited) of the Delano Municipal Code and find that the ordinance is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

3. Direct staff to schedule the second and final reading and adoption of the ordinance at the April 20, 2026, City Council regular meeting, or as soon thereafter as may be considered.

4. Alternatively, discuss and take other action related to this item.

DISCUSSION
On January 20, 2026, the City Council discussed the downtown parking enforcement and received a status update following the resumption of parking enforcement in late 2025. Staff were directed to distribute ballots to downtown businesses to obtain input regarding the parking zone enforcement policy and overall parking availability in the downtown area.

Based on the results, on March 16, 2026, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance revising the parking time limit in the downtown area parking zone from two to three hours and changing the downtown area parking zone boundary from “Cecil Avenue” to “Thirteenth Avenue”. See attached exhibit for reference to the revised downtown area parking zone. The proposed ordinance makes the revisions requested by the City Council and also revises DMC Section 10.16.200 to be consistent with state law, which allows parking zones to be created by a resolution or ordinance (i.e., resolutions are not required).

Furthermore, during the March 16 meeting, the City Council discussed possibly making exceptions for businesses within the downtown parking zone. One possible solution is the creation of a preferential parking program as allowed by California Vehicle Code section 22507 which states “The ordinance or resolution may include a designation of certain streets upon which preferential parking privileges are given to residents and merchants adjacent to the streets for their use and the use of their guests, under which the residents and merchants may be issued a permit or permits that exempt them from the prohibition or restriction of the ordinance or resolution.” Staff defer to City Council for consideration and direction.

Additionally, staff reviewed downtown parking zone signage, which the City complies with 2026 California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices section 2B.54 Placement of Parking, Standing, and Stopping Signs and has existing signage appropriately placed. There are approximately 70 existing 2-hour parking signs that will need to be replaced and approximately 30 potential missing parking zone signs that should be obtained including posts and concrete work. Therefore, approximately 100 new signs including mounting hardware, and approximately 30 posts are recommended to be purchased and installed if this ordinance is amended.

If introduced and adopted, the proposed ordinance would take effect 30 days from the second reading and adoption of the ordinance. State law requires the signs be in place before the time limits are enforced (VC § 22507).

FISCAL IMPACT:

A new appropriation of $7,150.00, which includes a 15% contingency, from the Gas Tax fund 111 is requested to cover the signage cost, with authorization for the Finance Director to amend the current budget for this expense under existing project account 111-57000-400-000000 General Supply.

ATTACHMENTS:

Downtown Parking Exhibit
Proposed Ordinance
Downton Parking Zone
Limits for proposed 3-hour parking limits.

Legend
1000 ft
N
➤
ORDINANCE NO. 2026 - ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
DELANO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.16.200
(PROCEDURE ESTABLISHING PARKING ZONES), 10.16.210
(PARKING ZONES ESTABLISHED) AND 10.16.220 (PARKING
MORE THAN TWO HOURS PROHIBITED) OF CHAPTER 10.16
(PARKING) OF THE DELANO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE

THE BOUNDARY OF THE DOWNTOWN AREA PARKING ZONE

AND TO INCREASE THE PARKING TIME LIMIT IN THAT
ZONE.

WHEREAS, the California Constitution provides that a city may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general law; and
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2008-1175, establishing the existing Chapter 10.16 of the Delano Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2026, the City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance revising the parking time limit in the downtown area parking zone from two to three hours and also changing the downtown area parking zone boundary from “Cecil Avenue” to “Thirteenth Avenue”; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 22507 provides that a local agency may designate parking zones either by ordinance or resolution.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DELANO,
CALIFONIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council for the City of Delano finds and declares the foregoing are true and correct and incorporates said recitals fully into this Ordinance as substantive findings.

SECTION 2. Amendment. Section 10.16.200 – Procedure Establishing Parking Zones – of Chapter 10.16 – Parking – of the Delano Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (deletions in strikethrough and additions in double underline):
“10.16.200 – Procedure establishing parking zones.

The city council may shall establish, delete or change parking zones by resolution.”
SECTION 3. Amendment. Section 10.16.210 – Parking Zones Established – of Chapter 10.16 – Parking – of the Delano Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as 2 follows (deletions in strikethrough and additions in double underline):
“10.16.210 – Parking zones established.

The following portions or street within the city are established as parking zones:

A. Glenwood Street from Ninth Avenue to Eleventh Avenue (west side of street only);
B. High Street from Tenth Avenue to Fourteenth Thirteenth Avenue (east side of street only);
C. Main Street from Ninth Avenue to Ceil Thirteenth Avenue (both sides of street);
D. Jefferson Street from Ninth Avenue to Eleventh Avenue (west side of street only);
E. Jefferson Street from Eleventh Avenue to Thirteenth Avenue (both sides of street);
F. Ninth Avenue from High Street to Jefferson Street (both sides of street); G. Tenth Avenue from High Street to Jefferson Street (both sides of street); H. Eleventh Avenue from High Street to Lexington Street (both sides of street); I. Twelfth Avenue from High Street to Lexington Street (both sides of street); J. Thirteenth Avenue from High Street to Jefferson Street (both sides of street);
K. Kensington Street from Eleventh Avenue to Twelfth Avenue (both sides of street).”
SECTION 4. Amendment. Section 10.16.220 – Parking More Than Two Hours Prohibited – of Chapter 10.16 – Parking – of the Delano Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (deletions in strikethrough and additions in double underline):
“10.16.220 – Parking more than two three hours prohibited.

It is unlawful, for any person between the hours of nine a.m. and six p.m. of any day except Sunday and holidays, to cause, allow, permit or suffer any vehicle registered in his name, operated or controlled by him, to be parked in any space upon any street within the foregoing parking zones listed in Section 10.16.210 for more than a two three-hour period.”
SECTION 5. The City Manager or her designee shall have the appropriate signs and curb markings installed to effectuate this ordinance.

SECTION 6. Environmental Assessment. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (California Public Resources Code 3 Sections 21000 et seq.) and State CEQA guidelines (Sections 15000 et seq.) the ordinance is not a “project” and further, that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance in question may have a significant effect on the environment, either directly or indirectly, and that therefore no environmental review under the CEQA is required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

SECTION 7. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the city council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after adoption.

SECTION 9. Publication. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance causing it to be posted as required by law.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ______________, 2026. __________________________
Salvador Solorio-Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Ricardo Chavez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
________________________________
Mark D. Hensley, City Attorney