Agenda — Desert Hot Springs City Council, May 2, 2023 (part 2 of 9)

Waste Mitigation -

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 20 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 50 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 143 of 1104 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7250 27.5646 18.9007 0.0398 19.8568 1.2670 21.1238 10.1555 1.1656 11.3211 0.0000 3,867.216 5 3,867.216
5 1.1967 0.0769 3,898.385
2 2024 80.9743 14.3352 18.6433 0.0368 0.8434 0.6228 1.4662 0.2269 0.5859 0.8128 0.0000 3,584.511 6 3,584.511
6 0.6219 0.0748 3,622.363
3 Maximum 80.9743 27.5646 18.9007 0.0398 19.8568 1.2670 21.1238 10.1555 1.1656 11.3211 0.0000 3,867.216 5 3,867.216
5 1.1967 0.0769 3,898.385
2 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7250 27.5646 18.9007 0.0398 19.8221 1.2670 21.0891 10.1469 1.1656 11.3125 0.0000 3,867.216 5 3,867.216
5 1.1967 0.0769 3,898.385
2 2024 80.9743 14.3352 18.6433 0.0368 0.7013 0.6228 1.3241 0.1921 0.5859 0.7779 0.0000 3,584.511 6 3,584.511
6 0.6219 0.0748 3,622.363
3 Maximum 80.9743 27.5646 18.9007 0.0398 19.8221 1.2670 21.0891 10.1469 1.1656 11.3125 0.0000 3,867.216 5 3,867.216
5 1.1967 0.0769 3,898.385
2 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 144 of 1104 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.78 0.42 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 145 of 1104 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Energy 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mobile 0.6175 0.7926 5.9500 0.0137 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8100e0030.3811 1,415.864 4 1,415.864
4 0.0674 0.0642 1,436.683
8 Total 2.3385 0.8479 6.0027 0.0140 1.3918 0.0147 1.4065 0.3713 0.0140 0.3853 1,482.211 6 1,482.211
6 0.0687 0.0654 1,503.426
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Energy 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mobile 0.6175 0.7926 5.9500 0.0137 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8100e0030.3811 1,415.864 4 1,415.864
4 0.0674 0.0642 1,436.683
8 Total 2.3385 0.8479 6.0027 0.0140 1.3918 0.0147 1.4065 0.3713 0.0140 0.3853 1,482.211 6 1,482.211
6 0.0687 0.0654 1,503.426
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 146 of 1104 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 3/7/2023 3/13/2023 5 5 2 Grading Grading 3/14/2023 3/23/2023 5 8
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/24/2023 2/8/2024 5 230 4 Paving Paving 2/9/2024 3/5/2024 5 18
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/6/2024 3/29/2024 5 18 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 90,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 30,000; Striped Parking Area: 5,436 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8
Acres of Paving: 2.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 147 of 1104 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 63.00 25.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 148 of 1104 ends

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0655 0.0404 0.6564 1.7600e0030.1998 9.4000e0040.2008 0.0530 8.6000e0040.0539 179.9084 179.9084 4.1200e0034.2000e003181.2634 Total 0.0655 0.0404 0.6564 1.7600e0030.1998 9.4000e0040.2008 0.0530 8.6000e0040.0539 179.9084 179.9084 4.1200e0034.2000e003181.2634 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 149 of 1104 ends

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0655 0.0404 0.6564 1.7600e0030.1651 9.4000e0040.1660 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 179.9084 179.9084 4.1200e0034.2000e003181.2634 Total 0.0655 0.0404 0.6564 1.7600e0030.1651 9.4000e0040.1660 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 179.9084 179.9084 4.1200e0034.2000e003181.2634 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 150 of 1104 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0546 0.0337 0.5470 1.4600e0030.1665 7.8000e0040.1673 0.0442 7.2000e0040.0449 149.9237 149.9237 3.4300e0033.5000e003151.0528 Total 0.0546 0.0337 0.5470 1.4600e0030.1665 7.8000e0040.1673 0.0442 7.2000e0040.0449 149.9237 149.9237 3.4300e0033.5000e003151.0528 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 151 of 1104 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0546 0.0337 0.5470 1.4600e0030.1376 7.8000e0040.1384 0.0371 7.2000e0040.0378 149.9237 149.9237 3.4300e0033.5000e003151.0528 Total 0.0546 0.0337 0.5470 1.4600e0030.1376 7.8000e0040.1384 0.0371 7.2000e0040.0378 149.9237 149.9237 3.4300e0033.5000e003151.0528 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 152 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0273 0.7655 0.3289 3.9700e0030.1440 6.4100e0030.1504 0.0415 6.1300e0030.0476 420.8135 420.8135 4.3600e0030.0622 439.4679 Worker 0.2293 0.1415 2.2974 6.1500e0030.6994 3.2800e0030.7027 0.1855 3.0200e0030.1885 629.6794 629.6794 0.0144 0.0147 634.4219 Total 0.2566 0.9069 2.6263 0.0101 0.8434 9.6900e0030.8531 0.2269 9.1500e0030.2361 1,050.492 9 1,050.492
9 0.0188 0.0769 1,073.889
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 153 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0273 0.7655 0.3289 3.9700e0030.1235 6.4100e0030.1299 0.0364 6.1300e0030.0426 420.8135 420.8135 4.3600e0030.0622 439.4679 Worker 0.2293 0.1415 2.2974 6.1500e0030.5778 3.2800e0030.5811 0.1556 3.0200e0030.1587 629.6794 629.6794 0.0144 0.0147 634.4219 Total 0.2566 0.9069 2.6263 0.0101 0.7013 9.6900e0030.7109 0.1921 9.1500e0030.2012 1,050.492 9 1,050.492
9 0.0188 0.0769 1,073.889
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 154 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0268 0.7654 0.3253 3.9100e0030.1439 6.3700e0030.1503 0.0415 6.0900e0030.0475 414.3262 414.3262 4.5100e0030.0612 432.6713 Worker 0.2138 0.1261 2.1513 5.9600e0030.6994 3.1400e0030.7025 0.1855 2.8900e0030.1884 614.4865 614.4865 0.0131 0.0137 618.8843 Total 0.2406 0.8915 2.4765 9.8700e0030.8434 9.5100e0030.8529 0.2269 8.9800e0030.2359 1,028.812 7 1,028.812
7 0.0176 0.0748 1,051.555
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 155 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0268 0.7654 0.3253 3.9100e0030.1235 6.3700e0030.1298 0.0364 6.0900e0030.0425 414.3262 414.3262 4.5100e0030.0612 432.6713 Worker 0.2138 0.1261 2.1513 5.9600e0030.5778 3.1400e0030.5809 0.1556 2.8900e0030.1585 614.4865 614.4865 0.0131 0.0137 618.8843 Total 0.2406 0.8915 2.4765 9.8700e0030.7013 9.5100e0030.7108 0.1921 8.9800e0030.2010 1,028.812 7 1,028.812
7 0.0176 0.0748 1,051.555
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 156 of 1104 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8814 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Paving 0.3028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1841 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0679 0.0400 0.6829 1.8900e0030.2220 1.0000e0030.2230 0.0589 9.2000e0040.0598 195.0751 195.0751 4.1500e0034.3400e003196.4712 Total 0.0679 0.0400 0.6829 1.8900e0030.2220 1.0000e0030.2230 0.0589 9.2000e0040.0598 195.0751 195.0751 4.1500e0034.3400e003196.4712 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 157 of 1104 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8814 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 0.0000 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Paving 0.3028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1841 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 0.0000 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0679 0.0400 0.6829 1.8900e0030.1834 1.0000e0030.1844 0.0494 9.2000e0040.0503 195.0751 195.0751 4.1500e0034.3400e003196.4712 Total 0.0679 0.0400 0.6829 1.8900e0030.1834 1.0000e0030.1844 0.0494 9.2000e0040.0503 195.0751 195.0751 4.1500e0034.3400e003196.4712 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 158 of 1104 ends

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 80.7494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 80.9302 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0441 0.0260 0.4439 1.2300e0030.1443 6.5000e0040.1450 0.0383 6.0000e0040.0389 126.7988 126.7988 2.7000e0032.8200e003127.7063 Total 0.0441 0.0260 0.4439 1.2300e0030.1443 6.5000e0040.1450 0.0383 6.0000e0040.0389 126.7988 126.7988 2.7000e0032.8200e003127.7063 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 159 of 1104 ends

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 80.7494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 80.9302 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0441 0.0260 0.4439 1.2300e0030.1192 6.5000e0040.1199 0.0321 6.0000e0040.0327 126.7988 126.7988 2.7000e0032.8200e003127.7063 Total 0.0441 0.0260 0.4439 1.2300e0030.1192 6.5000e0040.1199 0.0321 6.0000e0040.0327 126.7988 126.7988 2.7000e0032.8200e003127.7063 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 160 of 1104 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.6175 0.7926 5.9500 0.0137 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8100e0030.3811 1,415.864 4 1,415.864
4 0.0674 0.0642 1,436.683
8 Unmitigated 0.6175 0.7926 5.9500 0.0137 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8100e0030.3811 1,415.864 4 1,415.864
4 0.0674 0.0642 1,436.683
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Industrial Park 202.20 152.40 74.40 576,062 576,062
Total 202.20 152.40 74.40 576,062 576,062
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Parking Lot 13.80 6.20 6.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Industrial Park 13.80 6.20 6.20 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2 Improve Pedestrian Network

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 161 of 1104 ends

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Parking Lot 0.537845 0.056225 0.173186 0.138405 0.025906 0.007191 0.011447 0.018769 0.000611 0.000309 0.023821 0.001097 0.005189 Industrial Park 0.537845 0.056225 0.173186 0.138405 0.025906 0.007191 0.011447 0.018769 0.000611 0.000309 0.023821 0.001097 0.005189

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 162 of 1104 ends

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 563.836 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 0.563836 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 163 of 1104 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Unmitigated 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.3982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.8000e0046.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Total 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 164 of 1104 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.3982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.8000e0046.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Total 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 165 of 1104 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:28 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 166 of 1104 ends

2767 Logistics Center
Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the IS/MND's model Land Use - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths".

Grading - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Reduction to Acres of Grading Values" Architectural Coating - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors".

Area Coating - See SWAPE's comment on "Unsubstantiated Reductions to Architectural and Area Coating Emission Factors".

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE's comment on "Incorrect Application of Energy- and Area-Related Operational Mitigation Measures".

Energy Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND/s model.

Water Mitigation - Consistent with the IS/MND's model.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Industrial Park 60.00 1000sqft 1.38 60,000.00 0
Parking Lot 2.08 Acre 2.08 90,604.80 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Rural
15 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2024
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 167 of 1104 ends

Waste Mitigation -

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 20 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 50 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 168 of 1104 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7208 27.5661 18.7775 0.0397 19.8568 1.2670 21.1238 10.1555 1.1656 11.3211 0.0000 3,850.322 9 3,850.322
9 1.1967 0.0775 3,881.520
7 2024 80.9716 14.3867 18.2517 0.0363 0.8434 0.6228 1.4662 0.2269 0.5859 0.8128 0.0000 3,528.054 2 3,528.054
2 0.6218 0.0754 3,566.062
9 Maximum 80.9716 27.5661 18.7775 0.0397 19.8568 1.2670 21.1238 10.1555 1.1656 11.3211 0.0000 3,850.322 9 3,850.322
9 1.1967 0.0775 3,881.520
7 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 2.7208 27.5661 18.7775 0.0397 19.8221 1.2670 21.0891 10.1469 1.1656 11.3125 0.0000 3,850.322 9 3,850.322
9 1.1967 0.0775 3,881.520
7 2024 80.9716 14.3867 18.2517 0.0363 0.7013 0.6228 1.3241 0.1921 0.5859 0.7780 0.0000 3,528.054 2 3,528.054
2 0.6218 0.0754 3,566.062
9 Maximum 80.9716 27.5661 18.7775 0.0397 19.8221 1.2670 21.0891 10.1469 1.1656 11.3125 0.0000 3,850.322 9 3,850.322
9 1.1967 0.0775 3,881.520
7 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 169 of 1104 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.78 0.42 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 170 of 1104 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Energy 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mobile 0.5249 0.8406 5.2667 0.0127 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8200e0030.3811 1,314.753 2 1,314.753
2 0.0690 0.0656 1,336.014
4 Total 2.2459 0.8959 5.3195 0.0130 1.3918 0.0147 1.4065 0.3713 0.0140 0.3853 1,381.100 4 1,381.100
4 0.0703 0.0668 1,402.756
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Energy 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mobile 0.5249 0.8406 5.2667 0.0127 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8200e0030.3811 1,314.753 2 1,314.753
2 0.0690 0.0656 1,336.014
4 Total 2.2459 0.8959 5.3195 0.0130 1.3918 0.0147 1.4065 0.3713 0.0140 0.3853 1,381.100 4 1,381.100
4 0.0703 0.0668 1,402.756
6 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 171 of 1104 ends

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 90,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 30,000; Striped Parking Area: 5,436 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8
Acres of Paving: 2.08
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 172 of 1104 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 63.00 25.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.60 6.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 173 of 1104 ends

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0614 0.0419 0.5332 1.5900e0030.1998 9.4000e0040.2008 0.0530 8.6000e0040.0539 163.0148 163.0148 4.1100e0034.3000e003164.3989 Total 0.0614 0.0419 0.5332 1.5900e0030.1998 9.4000e0040.2008 0.0530 8.6000e0040.0539 163.0148 163.0148 4.1100e0034.3000e003164.3989 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 174 of 1104 ends

3.2 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0614 0.0419 0.5332 1.5900e0030.1651 9.4000e0040.1660 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 163.0148 163.0148 4.1100e0034.3000e003164.3989 Total 0.0614 0.0419 0.5332 1.5900e0030.1651 9.4000e0040.1660 0.0445 8.6000e0040.0453 163.0148 163.0148 4.1100e0034.3000e003164.3989 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 175 of 1104 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0511 0.0350 0.4443 1.3300e0030.1665 7.8000e0040.1673 0.0442 7.2000e0040.0449 135.8457 135.8457 3.4200e0033.5800e003136.9991 Total 0.0511 0.0350 0.4443 1.3300e0030.1665 7.8000e0040.1673 0.0442 7.2000e0040.0449 135.8457 135.8457 3.4200e0033.5800e003136.9991 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 176 of 1104 ends

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 0.7749 0.7749 0.7129 0.7129 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Total 1.7109 17.9359 14.7507 0.0297 7.0826 0.7749 7.8575 3.4247 0.7129 4.1377 0.0000 2,872.691 0 2,872.691
0 0.9291 2,895.918
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0511 0.0350 0.4443 1.3300e0030.1376 7.8000e0040.1384 0.0371 7.2000e0040.0378 135.8457 135.8457 3.4200e0033.5800e003136.9991 Total 0.0511 0.0350 0.4443 1.3300e0030.1376 7.8000e0040.1384 0.0371 7.2000e0040.0378 135.8457 135.8457 3.4200e0033.5800e003136.9991 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 177 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0252 0.8122 0.3403 3.9800e0030.1440 6.4400e0030.1504 0.0415 6.1600e0030.0476 421.9631 421.9631 4.2700e0030.0625 440.6819 Worker 0.2148 0.1468 1.8662 5.5700e0030.6994 3.2800e0030.7027 0.1855 3.0200e0030.1885 570.5518 570.5518 0.0144 0.0151 575.3961 Total 0.2400 0.9589 2.2065 9.5500e0030.8434 9.7200e0030.8531 0.2269 9.1800e0030.2361 992.5149 992.5149 0.0187 0.0775 1,016.078 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 178 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0252 0.8122 0.3403 3.9800e0030.1235 6.4400e0030.1299 0.0364 6.1600e0030.0426 421.9631 421.9631 4.2700e0030.0625 440.6819 Worker 0.2148 0.1468 1.8662 5.5700e0030.5778 3.2800e0030.5811 0.1556 3.0200e0030.1587 570.5518 570.5518 0.0144 0.0151 575.3961 Total 0.2400 0.9589 2.2065 9.5500e0030.7013 9.7200e0030.7110 0.1921 9.1800e0030.2012 992.5149 992.5149 0.0187 0.0775 1,016.078 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 179 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0248 0.8122 0.3366 3.9200e0030.1439 6.3900e0030.1503 0.0415 6.1100e0030.0476 415.4660 415.4660 4.4200e0030.0614 433.8740 Worker 0.2009 0.1308 1.7483 5.4000e0030.6994 3.1400e0030.7025 0.1855 2.8900e0030.1884 556.8894 556.8894 0.0131 0.0140 561.3813 Total 0.2256 0.9429 2.0849 9.3200e0030.8434 9.5300e0030.8529 0.2269 9.0000e0030.2359 972.3553 972.3553 0.0175 0.0754 995.2553 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 180 of 1104 ends

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0248 0.8122 0.3366 3.9200e0030.1235 6.3900e0030.1298 0.0364 6.1100e0030.0425 415.4660 415.4660 4.4200e0030.0614 433.8740 Worker 0.2009 0.1308 1.7483 5.4000e0030.5778 3.1400e0030.5809 0.1556 2.8900e0030.1585 556.8894 556.8894 0.0131 0.0140 561.3813 Total 0.2256 0.9429 2.0849 9.3200e0030.7013 9.5300e0030.7108 0.1921 9.0000e0030.2011 972.3553 972.3553 0.0175 0.0754 995.2553 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 181 of 1104 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8814 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Paving 0.3028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1841 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.5550 1.7100e0030.2220 1.0000e0030.2230 0.0589 9.2000e0040.0598 176.7903 176.7903 4.1400e0034.4400e003178.2163 Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.5550 1.7100e0030.2220 1.0000e0030.2230 0.0589 9.2000e0040.0598 176.7903 176.7903 4.1400e0034.4400e003178.2163 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 182 of 1104 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.8814 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 0.0000 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Paving 0.3028 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1841 8.2730 12.2210 0.0189 0.3987 0.3987 0.3685 0.3685 0.0000 1,805.620 5 1,805.620
5 0.5673 1,819.803
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.5550 1.7100e0030.1834 1.0000e0030.1844 0.0494 9.2000e0040.0503 176.7903 176.7903 4.1400e0034.4400e003178.2163 Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.5550 1.7100e0030.1834 1.0000e0030.1844 0.0494 9.2000e0040.0503 176.7903 176.7903 4.1400e0034.4400e003178.2163 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 183 of 1104 ends

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 80.7494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 80.9302 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0415 0.0270 0.3608 1.1100e0030.1443 6.5000e0040.1450 0.0383 6.0000e0040.0389 114.9137 114.9137 2.6900e0032.8800e003115.8406 Total 0.0415 0.0270 0.3608 1.1100e0030.1443 6.5000e0040.1450 0.0383 6.0000e0040.0389 114.9137 114.9137 2.6900e0032.8800e003115.8406 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 184 of 1104 ends

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 80.7494 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 80.9302 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0415 0.0270 0.3608 1.1100e0030.1192 6.5000e0040.1199 0.0321 6.0000e0040.0327 114.9137 114.9137 2.6900e0032.8800e003115.8406 Total 0.0415 0.0270 0.3608 1.1100e0030.1192 6.5000e0040.1199 0.0321 6.0000e0040.0327 114.9137 114.9137 2.6900e0032.8800e003115.8406 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 185 of 1104 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.5249 0.8406 5.2667 0.0127 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8200e0030.3811 1,314.753 2 1,314.753
2 0.0690 0.0656 1,336.014
4 Unmitigated 0.5249 0.8406 5.2667 0.0127 1.3918 0.0105 1.4023 0.3713 9.8200e0030.3811 1,314.753 2 1,314.753
2 0.0690 0.0656 1,336.014
4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 186 of 1104 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 187 of 1104 ends

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 563.836 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Industrial Park 0.563836 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.0800e0030.0553 0.0464 3.3000e0044.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e0034.2000e00366.3336 66.3336 1.2700e0031.2200e00366.7278 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 188 of 1104 ends

0.3982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.8000e0046.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Total 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 189 of 1104 ends

Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.3982 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 5.8000e0046.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Total 1.7149 6.0000e0056.3300e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0136 0.0136 4.0000e0050.0145 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 190 of 1104 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 25 Date: 3/13/2023 10:24 AM 2767 Logistics Center - Riverside-Salton Sea County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Item Number: 9.

Page 191 of 1104 ends

Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0158 Total DPM (lbs) 174.2858082 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.00242 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.086575342 Total DPM (g) 79056.04261 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.013260274 Construction Duration (days) 31 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.002293234 Total DPM (lbs) 4.84 Total DPM (lbs) 2.683835616 Release Height (meters) 3 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.000069616 Total DPM (g) 1217.387836 Total Acreage 4.85 Release Height (meters) 3 Start Date 12/1/2022 Max Horizontal (meters) 198.13 Total Acreage 4.85 End Date 1/1/2023 Min Horizontal (meters) 99.06 Max Horizontal (meters) 198.13 Construction Days 31 Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5 Min Horizontal (meters) 99.06 Setting Rural Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0858 Population 32,716 Setting Rural Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.470136986 Start Date 12/1/2022 Population 32,716 Construction Duration (days) 365 End Date 1/4/2024
Total DPM (lbs) 171.6 Total Construction Days 399
Total DPM (g) 77837.76 Total Years of Construction 1.09 Start Date 1/1/2023 Total Years of Operation 28.91
End Date 1/1/2024
Construction Days 365
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.00012
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.000657534
Construction Duration (days) 3
Total DPM (lbs) 0.001972603
Total DPM (g) 0.894772603
Start Date 1/1/2024
End Date 1/4/2024
Construction Days 3
2024
2023
Construction Operation
2022 Total Emission Rate
Attachment B
Item Number: 9.

Page 192 of 1104 ends

AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 03/08/23
13:59:56
TITLE: PODS Warehouse Project, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.229E‐02 g/s 0.182E‐01 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.117E‐06 g/(s‐m2) 0.927E‐06 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 198.13 meters 650.03 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 99.06 meters 325.00 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000     9.982 0   100.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* Attachment C
Item Number: 9.

Page 193 of 1104 ends

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON: Winter
ALBEDO: 0.35
BOWEN RATIO: 1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

YR MO DY JDY HR
‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐
10 01 01 1 01
H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M‐O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐1.16 0.043 ‐9.000 0.020 ‐999. 21. 5.4 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

10.0 250.0 2.0
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES **********************

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
DIST 1‐HR CONC DIST 1‐HR CONC
(m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1.00 5.796 2525.00 0.2847

25.00 7.008 2550.00 0.2810
Item Number: 9.

Page 194 of 1104 ends

50.00 8.123 2575.00 0.2773

75.00     9.107 2600.00    0.2738
100.00     9.982 2625.00    0.2703
125.00     9.571 2650.00    0.2669
150.00     8.606 2675.00    0.2635
175.00     7.612 2700.00    0.2603
200.00     6.743 2725.00    0.2571
225.00     6.002 2750.00    0.2540
250.00     5.375 2775.00    0.2509
275.00     4.845 2800.00    0.2479
300.00     4.394 2825.00    0.2465
325.00     4.008 2850.00    0.2436
350.00     3.677 2875.00    0.2407
375.00     3.385 2900.00    0.2379
400.00     3.134 2925.00    0.2351
425.00     2.911 2950.00    0.2324
450.00     2.714 2975.00    0.2298
475.00     2.538 3000.00    0.2272
500.00     2.381 3025.00    0.2246
525.00     2.241 3050.00    0.2222
550.00     2.115 3075.00    0.2197
575.00     1.998 3100.00    0.2173
600.00     1.893 3125.00    0.2150
625.00     1.797 3150.00    0.2126
650.00     1.710 3175.00    0.2104
675.00     1.629 3200.00    0.2082
700.00     1.555 3225.00    0.2060
725.00     1.486 3250.00    0.2038
750.00     1.422 3275.00    0.2017
775.00     1.363 3300.00    0.1996
800.00     1.308 3325.00    0.1976
825.00     1.257 3350.00    0.1956
850.00     1.209 3375.00    0.1937
875.00     1.164 3400.00    0.1917
900.00     1.122 3425.00    0.1898
925.00     1.083 3450.00    0.1880
950.00     1.046 3475.00    0.1861
975.00     1.011 3500.00    0.1843
1000.00    0.9779 3525.00    0.1826
1025.00    0.9469 3550.00    0.1808
1050.00    0.9173 3575.00    0.1791
1075.00    0.8893 3600.00    0.1774
1100.00    0.8629 3625.00    0.1758
1125.00    0.8377 3650.00    0.1741
1150.00    0.8138 3675.00    0.1725
1175.00    0.7908 3700.00    0.1709
1200.00    0.7690 3725.00    0.1694
1225.00    0.7482 3750.00    0.1679
1250.00    0.7284 3775.00    0.1664
1275.00    0.7094 3800.00    0.1649
Item Number: 9.

Page 195 of 1104 ends

1300.00    0.6914 3825.00    0.1634
1325.00    0.6742 3850.00    0.1620
1350.00    0.6576 3875.00    0.1606
1375.00    0.6417 3900.00    0.1592
1400.00    0.6266 3925.00    0.1578
1425.00    0.6120 3950.00    0.1564
1450.00    0.5980 3975.00    0.1551
1475.00    0.5846 4000.00    0.1538
1500.00    0.5717 4025.00    0.1525
1525.00    0.5593 4050.00    0.1512
1550.00    0.5474 4075.00    0.1500
1575.00    0.5359 4100.00    0.1487
1600.00    0.5248 4125.00    0.1475
1625.00    0.5141 4150.00    0.1463
1650.00    0.5037 4175.00    0.1451
1675.00    0.4937 4200.00    0.1439
1700.00    0.4840 4225.00    0.1428
1725.00    0.4746 4250.00    0.1416
1750.00    0.4655 4275.00    0.1405
1775.00    0.4568 4300.00    0.1394
1800.00    0.4483 4325.00    0.1383
1825.00    0.4401 4350.00    0.1372
1850.00    0.4321 4375.00    0.1362
1875.00    0.4244 4400.00    0.1351
1900.00    0.4169 4425.00    0.1341
1924.99    0.4097 4450.00    0.1331
1950.00    0.4027 4475.00    0.1321
1975.00    0.3958 4500.00    0.1311
2000.00    0.3892 4525.00    0.1301
2025.00    0.3828 4550.00    0.1291
2050.00    0.3765 4575.00    0.1282
2075.00    0.3705 4600.00    0.1272
2100.00    0.3645 4625.00    0.1263
2125.00    0.3588 4650.00    0.1254
2150.00    0.3532 4675.00    0.1244
2175.00    0.3478 4700.00    0.1235
2200.00    0.3425 4725.00    0.1227
2225.00    0.3374 4750.00    0.1218
2250.00    0.3323 4775.00    0.1209
2275.00    0.3274 4800.00    0.1201
2300.00    0.3227 4825.00    0.1192
2325.00    0.3180 4850.00    0.1184
2350.00    0.3135 4875.00    0.1176
2375.00    0.3091 4900.00    0.1168
2400.00    0.3048 4925.00    0.1159
2425.00    0.3006 4950.00    0.1152
2450.00    0.2965 4975.00    0.1144
2475.00    0.2925 5000.00    0.1136
2500.00    0.2885
Item Number: 9.

Page 196 of 1104 ends

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 3‐hour, 8‐hour, and 24‐hour scaled
concentrations are equal to the 1‐hour concentration as referenced in

SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4)
Report number EPA‐454/R‐92‐019
http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance_permit.htm
under Screening Guidance
MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1‐HOUR 3‐HOUR 8‐HOUR 24‐HOUR ANNUAL
CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 9.988 9.988 9.988 9.988 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 102.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 5.796 5.796 5.796 5.796 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
Item Number: 9.

Page 197 of 1104 ends

AERSCREEN 21112 / AERMOD 21112 03/08/23
14:08:39
TITLE: PODS Warehouse Project, Operation
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ******************************  AREA PARAMETERS  **************************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.696E‐04 g/s 0.553E‐03 lb/hr
AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.355E‐08 g/(s‐m2) 0.282E‐07 lb/(hr‐m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 198.13 meters 650.03 feet
AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 99.06 meters 325.00 feet
INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet
RURAL OR URBAN: RURAL
INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ***********************  BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS  ********************** ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON‐POINT SOURCES
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **************************  FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS  *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters ‐ 5000. meters
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM  IMPACT  RECEPTOR
Zo SURFACE   1‐HR CONC  RADIAL  DIST   TEMPORAL
SECTOR    ROUGHNESS  (ug/m3)    (deg)   (m)    PERIOD
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
1*       1.000    0.3031 0   100.0     WIN
* = worst case diagonal
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ **********************  MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS  ********************* Item Number: 9.

Page 198 of 1104 ends

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE:    250.0 / 310.0 (K)
MINIMUM WIND SPEED:       0.5 m/s
ANEMOMETER HEIGHT:     10.000 meters
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES
DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban
DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE:    Average Moisture
DOMINANT SEASON:          Winter
ALBEDO:                  0.35
BOWEN RATIO:             1.50
ROUGHNESS LENGTH:       1.000 (meters)
SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED

OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ MAXIMUM                             MAXIMUM
DIST     1‐HR CONC                  DIST     1‐HR CONC
(m)      (ug/m3)                    (m)      (ug/m3)
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐               ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

1.00 0.1760 2525.00 0.8646E‐02

25.00 0.2128 2550.00 0.8533E‐02 Item Number: 9.

Page 199 of 1104 ends

50.00 0.2467 2575.00 0.8422E‐02

75.00 0.2765 2600.00 0.8314E‐02 100.00 0.3031 2625.00 0.8208E‐02 125.00 0.2907 2650.00 0.8105E‐02 150.00 0.2613 2675.00 0.8003E‐02 175.00 0.2312 2700.00 0.7904E‐02 200.00 0.2048 2725.00 0.7807E‐02 225.00 0.1823 2750.00 0.7712E‐02 250.00 0.1632 2775.00 0.7619E‐02 275.00 0.1471 2800.00 0.7529E‐02 300.00 0.1334 2825.00 0.7485E‐02 325.00 0.1217 2850.00 0.7396E‐02 350.00 0.1117 2875.00 0.7309E‐02 375.00 0.1028 2900.00 0.7224E‐02 400.00 0.9517E‐01 2925.00 0.7140E‐02 425.00 0.8839E‐01 2950.00 0.7058E‐02 450.00 0.8242E‐01 2975.00 0.6978E‐02 475.00 0.7708E‐01 3000.00 0.6899E‐02 500.00 0.7230E‐01 3025.00 0.6822E‐02 525.00 0.6805E‐01 3050.00 0.6746E‐02 550.00 0.6422E‐01 3075.00 0.6672E‐02 575.00 0.6068E‐01 3100.00 0.6599E‐02 600.00 0.5748E‐01 3125.00 0.6528E‐02 625.00 0.5457E‐01 3150.00 0.6458E‐02 650.00 0.5192E‐01 3175.00 0.6389E‐02 675.00 0.4948E‐01 3200.00 0.6321E‐02 700.00 0.4722E‐01 3225.00 0.6255E‐02 725.00 0.4513E‐01 3250.00 0.6190E‐02 750.00 0.4319E‐01 3275.00 0.6126E‐02 775.00 0.4140E‐01 3300.00 0.6063E‐02 800.00 0.3973E‐01 3325.00 0.6001E‐02 825.00 0.3818E‐01 3350.00 0.5940E‐02 850.00 0.3673E‐01 3375.00 0.5881E‐02 875.00 0.3536E‐01 3400.00 0.5822E‐02 900.00 0.3408E‐01 3425.00 0.5765E‐02 925.00 0.3288E‐01 3450.00 0.5708E‐02 950.00 0.3175E‐01 3475.00 0.5652E‐02 975.00 0.3069E‐01 3500.00 0.5598E‐02 1000.00 0.2970E‐01 3525.00 0.5544E‐02 1025.00 0.2875E‐01 3550.00 0.5491E‐02 1050.00 0.2786E‐01 3575.00 0.5439E‐02 1075.00 0.2701E‐01 3600.00 0.5388E‐02 1100.00 0.2620E‐01 3625.00 0.5337E‐02 1125.00 0.2544E‐01 3650.00 0.5288E‐02 1150.00 0.2471E‐01 3675.00 0.5239E‐02 1175.00 0.2402E‐01 3700.00 0.5191E‐02 1200.00 0.2335E‐01 3725.00 0.5144E‐02 1225.00 0.2272E‐01 3750.00 0.5097E‐02 1250.00 0.2212E‐01 3775.00 0.5052E‐02 1275.00 0.2154E‐01 3800.00 0.5007E‐02 Item Number: 9.

Page 200 of 1104 ends

1300.00 0.2100E‐01 3825.00 0.4962E‐02 1325.00 0.2047E‐01 3850.00 0.4919E‐02 1350.00 0.1997E‐01 3875.00 0.4876E‐02 1375.00 0.1949E‐01 3900.00 0.4833E‐02 1400.00 0.1903E‐01 3925.00 0.4792E‐02 1425.00 0.1859E‐01 3950.00 0.4750E‐02 1450.00 0.1816E‐01 3975.00 0.4710E‐02 1475.00 0.1775E‐01 4000.00 0.4670E‐02 1500.00 0.1736E‐01 4025.00 0.4631E‐02 1525.00 0.1699E‐01 4050.00 0.4592E‐02 1550.00 0.1662E‐01 4075.00 0.4554E‐02 1575.00 0.1627E‐01 4100.00 0.4516E‐02 1600.00 0.1594E‐01 4125.00 0.4479E‐02 1625.00 0.1561E‐01 4150.00 0.4442E‐02 1650.00 0.1530E‐01 4175.00 0.4406E‐02 1675.00 0.1499E‐01 4200.00 0.4371E‐02 1700.00 0.1470E‐01 4225.00 0.4336E‐02 1725.00 0.1441E‐01 4250.00 0.4301E‐02 1750.00 0.1414E‐01 4275.00 0.4267E‐02 1775.00 0.1387E‐01 4300.00 0.4233E‐02 1800.00 0.1361E‐01 4325.00 0.4200E‐02 1825.00 0.1336E‐01 4350.00 0.4167E‐02 1850.00 0.1312E‐01 4375.00 0.4135E‐02 1875.00 0.1289E‐01 4400.00 0.4103E‐02 1900.00 0.1266E‐01 4425.00 0.4072E‐02 1924.99 0.1244E‐01 4450.00 0.4041E‐02 1950.00 0.1223E‐01 4475.00 0.4010E‐02 1975.00 0.1202E‐01 4500.00 0.3980E‐02 2000.00 0.1182E‐01 4525.00 0.3950E‐02 2025.00 0.1162E‐01 4550.00 0.3921E‐02 2050.00 0.1143E‐01 4575.00 0.3892E‐02 2075.00 0.1125E‐01 4600.00 0.3863E‐02 2100.00 0.1107E‐01 4625.00 0.3835E‐02 2125.00 0.1090E‐01 4650.00 0.3807E‐02 2150.00 0.1073E‐01 4675.00 0.3779E‐02 2175.00 0.1056E‐01 4700.00 0.3752E‐02 2200.00 0.1040E‐01 4725.00 0.3725E‐02 2225.00 0.1024E‐01 4750.00 0.3698E‐02 2250.00 0.1009E‐01 4775.00 0.3672E‐02 2275.00 0.9944E‐02 4800.00 0.3646E‐02 2300.00 0.9799E‐02 4825.00 0.3621E‐02 2325.00 0.9658E‐02 4850.00 0.3595E‐02 2350.00 0.9521E‐02 4875.00 0.3570E‐02 2375.00 0.9387E‐02 4900.00 0.3545E‐02 2400.00 0.9256E‐02 4924.99 0.3521E‐02 2425.00 0.9128E‐02 4950.00 0.3497E‐02 2450.00 0.9004E‐02 4975.00 0.3473E‐02 2475.00 0.8882E‐02 5000.00 0.3450E‐02 2500.00 0.8763E‐02
Item Number: 9.

Page 201 of 1104 ends

CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC
PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ FLAT TERRAIN 0.3033 0.3033 0.3033 0.3033 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 102.00 meters

IMPACT AT THE
AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.1760 0.1760 0.1760 0.1760 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters
Item Number: 9.

Page 202 of 1104 ends

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigationand RemediationStrategies
LitigationSupport and Testifying Expert
IndustrialStormwaterCompliance
CEQAReview
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

ProfessionalCertifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
ProfessionalExperience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment D
Item Number: 9.

Page 203 of 1104 ends

2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vaporintrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications forlarge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.

Item Number: 9.

Page 204 of 1104 ends

3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted Item Number: 9.

Page 205 of 1104 ends

4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific Item Number: 9.

Page 206 of 1104 ends

5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peerreview of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

Item Number: 9.

Page 207 of 1104 ends

6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Item Number: 9.

Page 208 of 1104 ends

7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Item Number: 9.

Page 209 of 1104 ends

8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

Item Number: 9.

Page 210 of 1104 ends

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment E
Item Number: 9.

Page 211 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Item Number: 9.

Page 212 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Item Number: 9.

Page 213 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Item Number: 9.

Page 214 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Item Number: 9.

Page 215 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Item Number: 9.

Page 216 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

Item Number: 9.

Page 217 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
Item Number: 9.

Page 218 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
Item Number: 9.

Page 219 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
Item Number: 9.

Page 220 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
Item Number: 9.

Page 221 of 1104 ends

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
Item Number: 9.

Page 222 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066
City of Desert Hot Springs
Planning Commission

AGENDA ITEM REPORT
To: Planning Commission
Date: March 28, 2023
Department: Community Development
Prepared by: Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
Subject: Development Permit No. 22-4: An Application to Develop a 60,000 Square Foot Warehouse Facility for the PODS Company
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Staff Report
2) Entertain questions of Staff from the Planning Commission; 3) Open Public Hearing;
4) Take testimony from Applicant;
5) Take public testimony for those in favor;
6) Take public testimony from those opposed;
7) Take public testimony from those in a neutral position; 8) Opportunity for Applicant rebuttal;
9) Close the Public Hearing;
10) Planning Commission discussion; and
11) A recommendation of approval for the following: 1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and 2) Development Permit No. 22-4 to develop an 60,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Findings.

BACKGROUND:

The applicant, Almar Management, filed an application on July 14th, 2022, to develop a single story 60,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility. The 4.85-acre project property consists of vacant land and is located on the northeast corner of Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue (APN 666-360-017).

DISCUSSION:

The project proposes the development of an approximately 60,000 square foot building to support a climate-controlled warehouse facility and supporting infrastructure improvements. The warehouse will house the PODS Company, a company which moves goods in portable storage units. The units are delivered by truck to homes and businesses where they are filled with personal or business belongings, are then picked up again by truck for storage in the warehouse before the storage unit is moved to the location requested by the client. The storage units are warehoused for a short or long duration, and per the client’s needs are removed from the warehouse for delivery to a local or national destination. The proposed warehouse building is not a refrigerated/cold storage warehouse. The entire warehouse will be used for storage of the portable storage units.

Item Number: 9.

Page 223 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066

SETTING
The Zoning, General Plan Land-Use designations, and current land uses for surrounding properties are as follows:

Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses

General Plan & Zoning
Designations Current Land-Use
North Industrial/Light Industrial
(I/I-L) Vacant Land
West Industrial/Specific Plan
(I/SP) Coachillin Business Park
South Industrial/Light Industrial
(I/I-L) Vacant Land
East Industrial/Light Industrial
(I/I-L) Vacant Land

DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ANALYSIS

ZONING CONSISTENCY
The project proposes the development of a 60,000 square foot warehouse facility. Per Section 17.16.01 of the “Permitted Uses – Industrial Districts” a “Warehouse, Wholesaling and Distribution” is a use that is “P” Permitted by Right. Per Section 17.04.050 Definitions “Warehouse, Wholesaling, and Distribution” “Means indoor storage and sale of goods to other firms for resale, storage of goods for transfer to retail outlets of the same firm, or storage and sale of materials and supplies used in production or operation, including janitorial and restaurant supplies. Wholesalers are primarily engaged in business-to-business sales but may sell to individual consumers through mail or internet orders.

They normally operate from a warehouse or office having little or no display of merchandise and are not designed to solicit walk-in traffic.”
Staff has evaluated the proposed plans and found the project to be consistent with the development standards of the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code (DHSMC). An analysis of the project to the DHSMC can be found in Table 2 below, which provides a comparison of the site planning aspects of the project with each of the individual development standards.

CONSISTENCY WITH THE DHSMC
Staff has provided an analysis of the elements of the project with the Development Standards, below in Table 2.

Table 2: Comparison to DHSMC:

Development Standards
Standard Light Industrial Zone Proposed Consistent
Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sq. ft. Already subdivided Yes
Maximum structure
height 120 Feet 33 Feet 6 Inches Yes
Maximum number of
stories 5 Stories 1 Story Yes
Item Number: 9.

Page 224 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066
Minimum front setback 20 Feet 35’ 6’’ Feet Yes
Minimum side setback 10’ Interior
10’ Corner
57’ Interior
50’ Corner Yes
Minimum rear yard
setback 10 Feet 100 Feet Yes
Building lot coverage 75 % 35% Yes

REVIEW AUTHORITY
Pursuant to Section 17.64.010 & Table 17.64.01 of the DHSMC, applicants requesting the construction of a new commercial/industrial building, specifically require the review and approval from the Planning Commission.

CIRCULATION
The project site will have three (3) entry points, two (2) on Calle De Los Romos along the western boundary and one (1) on 19th Avenue along the eastern boundary. Calle De Los Romos is currently paved with curb and gutter on the west side but not fully improved adjacent to the proposed project. 19th Avenue is not paved adjacent to the proposed project. The local north-south circulation is provided by Indian Canyon Drive located approximately 0.25 miles west of the project. Regional access to the site is provided by the I-10 Freeway located approximately 0.50 miles south of the project.

Access to the truck circulation and loading area of the project will be gated to only allow authorized personnel. This may be accessed by a controlled keyed entry system such as a Knox Box for use of police and fire personnel. The project will improve Calle De Los Romos from centerline to right-of-way (39 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Also 19th Avenue from centerline to rightof-way (44 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. The final street improvements will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

The proposed circulation and parking for the proposed facility will be consistent with City parking standards. A parking analysis is provided below in Table 3:

Table 3: Parking Analysis
Proposed Use Zoning Requirements Spaces Required Spaces Provided Warehouse: 60,000 sq.
ft. 1 Stall/750 sq. ft. 80 Stalls 93 Stalls

ARCHITECTURE
The proposed building will be designed to create interest by using various materials. Materials used will consist of masonry block, steel doors and garage doors, and windows. The proposed structure is proposed to be a tilt up construction in a neutral in colors of white and grey tones with glazed windows, steel man doors, and steel garage doors.

LANDSCAPING
Landscaping has been designed to balance aesthetic, water use and security objectives. The project landscape will include large drought-tolerant flowering trees and shrubs typically found in the region, such as fan palms, live oak or mesquite tree, and blue palo verde. Exterior irrigation will use drip or micro-spray applicators to avoid overwatering and promote water efficiency. The landscaping at the project’s frontage will consist of trees, along with low level plantings and fencing to visually enhance, Item Number: 9.

Page 225 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066
protect and blend the facility into its surroundings while also promoting visibility by law enforcement vehicles from the street.

WALL/FENCING PLAN
The proposed warehouse project will be installing a wrought iron or tubular steel fencing with an access gate on the east side of the building.

NOTICING REQUIREMENT
The project was noticed to neighboring property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site on Thursday, March 16th, 2023, and was advertised in the Desert Star on Wednesday, March 15th, 2023, per noticing requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The applicant has paid all required fees for the review and entitlement process and will be subject to all Building Permit fees and property taxes.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), an Initial Study has been prepared and has determined that development of the proposed project would not have a significant impact on the environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures. A draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH# 2023020381) is proposed and contains certain measures for Cultural Resources and Biological Resources in conformance with Section 15070, Subsection (a), of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

OPTIONAL:

1. That the proposed use is permitted within the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of this Zoning Ordinance, including prescribed development standards and design guidelines;
The proposed warehouse facility use is a permitted use by zoning and land use, Per Section

17.16.020 of the Permitted Uses Table. Goal LU-8 encourages industrial opportunities and new development that broaden the economic and employment base of the city. Policy LU-8.1 encourages employment centers to ensure that a variety of land uses and infrastructure that will allow the City to remain economically competitive. As such, Staff recommends this finding.

2. That the subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the land use being proposed;
The proposed application is for the development of a 60,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility. Policy LU-8:
allow industrial opportunities and new development that broaden the economic and employment base of the City. The site is relatively flat with drainage to the southeast. Therefore, the City has determined that the type of proposed use and intensity of the use being proposed is suitable to the subject site(s). Staff recommends this finding.

3. That the proposed development would be compatible with existing and future developments within the land use district and general area; Item Number: 9.

Page 226 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066
Policy LU-8.2 promotes industrial development projects in areas with available infrastructure and adjacent to major transportation corridors. Site such uses in areas where impacts on public health and safety can be minimized. The site is surrounded by Light Industrial uses on all four sides. The City has also evaluated the building materials, architectural style and proposed landscaping and found them to be consistent with the DHSMC. Staff recommends this finding.

4. That there are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use is not detrimental to public health and safety; The project has been conditioned by City staff, the County Fire Department and by Mission Springs Water Districts to provide potable water, access to sewer line, adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services. This will ensure that the 60,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility remains well-maintained and does not become detrimental to public health and safety. Goal OS-3:
a sustainable, reliable, and clean water supply, and Policy OS-3.1: Water Conservation, requires water conservation measures in new development, equivalent to Cal Green Tier One or similar standards. Staff recommends this finding.

5. That there is adequate public access and roadway capacity to serve the subject proposal;
The current project has been conditioned to ensure that adequate public access and roadway capacity to serve the proposed project site. Goal MI-1 promotes an inclusive mobility framework that safely and efficiently moves and connects people, destination, vehicles, and goods, and Policy MI-1.1 reinforces the need for a Transportation Network Improvements and it also establishes and maintains a multimodal mobility plan which sets forth improvement plans and project prioritization for a variety of modes and users of the transportation network. The project will improve Calle De Los Romos from centerline to right-of-way (39 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Also 19th Avenue from centerline to right-of-way (44 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping. Staff recommends this finding.

6. That there are no significant harmful effects upon environmental quality and natural resources;
Goal OS-2 requires air quality that is healthy for residents and the environment. Policy OS-2.1 seeks to reduce air pollution through the implementation of existing regulations and the creation of new regulations where needed. Policy OS-2.2 requires finding creative means to comply with State laws addressing climate change. Policy OS-2.3 addresses minimizing the air quality impacts of new development projects on established uses. The applicant completed an Initial Study and it was found that all impacts can be mitigated. Therefore, the City has determined that the proposed project will not have or cause significant harmful effects upon environmental quality and natural resources. Staff recommends this finding.

7. That any negative impacts of the proposed use can and shall be mitigated; Mitigation measures if approved will adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program included within the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The proposed project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures in the MND and has been conditioned by the Fire, Engineering and Planning Department’s to comply with current standards. The Building Department will review the plans upon Item Number: 9.

Page 227 of 1104 ends

SR-23-066
submittal of the plan check to ensure the projects compliance with the California Building Code.

Staff recommends this finding.

8. That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan; and The General Plan identifies the site as Industrial. The Zoning Map identifies the site as Light Industrial. Therefore, staff has evaluated the consistency of the proposed project with the City’s General Plan Goals & Polices and has not identified any inconsistencies. The proposed project will also be subject to the implementation of Conditions of Approval and will be required to comply the mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Staff recommends this finding.

9. That the proposed location, size, design, and operational characteristics of the planned use are not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.

Staff has evaluated the subject site’s location, size, design, and operational characteristics of the proposed project comply with the design standards of the Light Industrial (I) zoning designation and Land Use designation. The Planning Department, Engineering, Public Works Department, Cal Fire, Mission Springs Water District (MSWD) have all reviewed the proposed project and found it to meet all development criteria and have imposed conditions of approval on the proposed development.

Staff recommends this finding.

ATTACHMENTS:

EXHIBIT 1 - Draft Conditions of Approval
EXHIBIT 2 - Proposed Set of Plans
EXHIBIT 3 - Material Color Board
EXHIBIT 4 - Preliminary Grading Plans
EXHIBIT 5 - Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration
EXHIBIT 6 - Comment Letter 1
EXHIBIT 7 - Comment Letter 2
Item Number: 9.

Page 228 of 1104 ends

1 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
MEETING DATE: March 28, 2023
TITLE: Almar Management
CASE NO: Development Permit No. 22-4
PREPARED BY: Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
Project Specific Conditions:

1. The approval of Development Permit No. 22-4 is for the development of a 60,000 sq. ft. warehouse facility on a 4.86-acre parcel, along with parking, landscape, and other associated improvements to be located on APN: 666- 360-017.

2. No signage is approved under the permits.

3. The applicant shall submit a Sign Permit application for all signs to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department to include the following:
a. All signs shall be channel letters.
b. No sign shall have exposed raceways or conduits.
c. All signage shall comply with the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code. d. All signs that are removed shall be painted and patched immediately.

4. All appropriate permits shall be pulled with the City’s Building Department.

Standard Administrative Conditions

5. The approval of DP 22-4 is subject to the two (2) year expiration provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance, as provided in Section 17.92.070 and will expire on March 28, 2025.
‘’Commencement of construction shall have occurred within 2 years of Development Permit approval, or the permit shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of 2 years, then the Development Permit shall become null and void.

Further, if after issuance of grading permit, work is discontinued for a period of 6 months, then the Development Permit shall become null and void, unless extended. Projects may be built in phases if so pre-approved by the review authority. If a project is built in pre-approved phases, each Item Number: 9.

Page 229 of 1104 ends

2 subsequent phase shall have 2 years from the previous phase’s date or first Certificate of Occupancy to the next phase’s date of construction commencement to have occurred, or the Development Permit shall become null and void. If no building permit is required for the Development Permit, the Development Permit shall expire if it is not exercised within 2 years of the approval.”

6. The applicant may request an extension of time for DP 22-4 per the City's Zoning Ordinance Section 17.92.100. Upon an application being filed and associated fees paid prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension not to exceed 12 months. Upon granting the extension, the review authority shall ensure that the Development Permit complies with all current Zoning Ordinance provisions. The maximum number of extensions shall be limited to 3, for a total maximum term of 5 years.

7. The applicant/developer shall indemnify, protect, hold harmless and defend, with counsel selected by the City, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings, including those involving environmental issues, against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, and/or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the entitlement application. City shall promptly notify both the Applicant/Developer and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regard to such defense.

8. All development on the Project Site shall be in compliance with all applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code as well as all applicable provisions of the adopted Building and Fire Codes. All new construction shall obtain a building permit and comply with the requirements of the Planning, Building, and Fire Departments.

9. No Certificate of Occupancy (C of O) shall be granted until all Conditions of Approval have been completed and approved by the Planning, Engineering, Building, and Fire Departments unless otherwise identified herein.

10. The development of the Project on the Project Site shall be in substantial compliance with the exhibits contained in the project file for DP 22-4 as shown in all Exhibits and incorporated herein by this reference.

11. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the designs set forth in the hydrology report and site drainage design.

Item Number: 9.

Page 230 of 1104 ends

3 12. Within fifteen (15) days of final approval by the Planning Commission, the applicant/developer shall submit in writing, a statement indicating that he/she has read and agrees to the conditions imposed herein. This authorization shall become void, and any privilege, permit, or other authorization granted under this entitlement DP 22-4 shall be deemed to have elapsed if compliance with this condition has not been undertaken within the specified time limits.

13. The applicant/developer shall deliver within 5 (five) working days to the Community Development Department a cashier’s check, money order, or other acceptable form of payment made payable to “Riverside County” in the amount of $2,764 plus $50.00 for processing fee to enable the City to file a Notice of Determination required pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section 15075. Any additional fees that may be attributed to the required filing of environmental documents shall be paid by the Applicant/Developer. If applicant/developer has not delivered to the Community Development Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).

14. A scanned copy of the signed Conditions of Approval shall be included in the Building Construction Plans submitted for plan check.

15. The applicant/developer shall pay all established service, permit, impact, public art, and other applicable fees required by the City. Note:The Transportation Unified Mitigation Fee is collected by the City of Desert Hot Springs on behalf of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments.

Questions on the calculation of this fee should be addressed to them at (760) 346-1127. The School District Fees are imposed by the Palm Springs Unified School District and questions should be addressed to them at (760) 416-6159.

Engineering Department Conditions
General Requirements

16. The applicant/developer shall annex to Community Facilities District No. 2010-1 for the maintenance of:
a. Landscape/hardscape
b. Streetlights
c. Drainage/Basins/Storm Drain Facilities
d. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy

17. The applicant/developer shall pay the Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) cost for the City’s consultant to annex to the Community Facilities District Item Number: 9.

Page 231 of 1104 ends

4 No. 2010-1 and the City fee for processing the request. The annexation shall be completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.

18. The applicant/developer shall pay the Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000) cost for the City’s consultant to annex to PTAX2 and the City fee for processing the request. The annexation shall be completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.

19. The applicant/developer shall submit the following items for approval from the Engineering Department:
a. Grading Plans with the street address for each lot and/or building footprints
b. Storm Drain/Drainage Plans
c. Street Improvement Plans
d. Street Signage and Stripping Plans
e. Street Lighting Plans
f. Hydrology Report
g. Water Quality Management Plan
h. Composite Utility Plans
i. (Sewer and Water Plans – submit to Mission Springs Water District)

20. Any required water and sewer facilities must be constructed and paid for by the applicant/developer per the stands of the Mission Springs Water District (MSWD) and will require inspection by MSWD.

21. Prior to the installation of any improvements in the public right of way (ROW), an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Public Works Department.

22. A soil compaction report shall be prepared and submitted to the City Building Department for approval prior to issuance of any building permit.

23. There shall be no encroachment into public rights of way for construction trailers, equipment, trash bins, portable toilets, or materials; all of which shall be kept on-site. Construction access to the site shall be by an approved driveway, entry, or curb cut; no asphalt ramps or curb jumping is permitted.

24. At no time shall any adjacent streets for the project be allowed to be used for construction staging, storage or other such construction related activities.

Access by heavy equipment shall be limited to the minimum number of trips essential to completing the construction. Any damage to the existing public roadways, sidewalks or other infrastructure shall be repaired or replaced by the Applicant’s contractor at his own expense, as directed by the Public Works Manager.

Item Number: 9.

Page 232 of 1104 ends

5 25. The applicant/developer shall submit an owner-and contractor-signed PM10 Dust Control Implementation Plan in accordance with the standards and codes of the City and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of any grading and/or applicable building permits. Any site that is greater than 10 acres shall concurrently process a PM10 Dust Control Implementation Plan with the SCAQMD. For further information contact the SCAQMD at:

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
21865 Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
(800) CUT-SMOG (288-7664)
www.aqmd.gov

26. The applicant/developer shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements per the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations. The
Applicant/Developer shall submit a Project Specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to comply with the California General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with the Construction Activity, prior to the issuance of a grading permit. For projects larger than 1 acre, the Applicant/Developer shall obtain all required permits from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID#) to the City’s Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the any grading permit.

For further information contact the RWQCB at:

California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Colorado River Basin Region,
73-720 Fred Waring Drive #100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 346-7491
www.waterboards.ca.gov/colorariver

27. The applicant/developer shall comply with section 8.08 Recycling and Diversion of Waste from Construction and Demolition of the Municipal Code and file a Plan with the City’s Building Department prior to the start of any construction.

28. The design of the on-site grading, street improvements and the storm drainage improvements shall be coordinated with all adjacent projects to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

29. All overhead utilities less than 92kv, located within the project boundaries, bordering the project and/or fronting the project shall be undergrounded.

Item Number: 9.

Page 233 of 1104 ends

6 30. If not all the public improvements are completed before the applicant/developer applies for a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant/developer may submit an engineer’s estimate with approved improvement plans and shall file an improvement agreement with security to guarantee completion of public improvements as follows:
a. A faithful performance security in an amount deemed sufficient by the City Engineer to cover up to 100% of the total estimated cost of all required improvements, including bonding requirements for grading as outlined in the Municipal Code.
b. A labor and material security to cover up to 50% of the total estimated cost of all required improvements.
c. If the required project improvements are financed and installed pursuant to special assessment proceedings, upon the furnishing by the contractor of the faithful performance and labor and material security required by the special assessment act being used, the City may reduce the improvement security of the Applicant/Developer by an amount corresponding to the amount of the security furnished by the contractor.
d. Notwithstanding the above, the Applicant/Developer may satisfy the requirement for security of certain improvements by providing proof that same has been posted with another public agency subject to the approval of the City Engineer.

31. Security may be one of the following types subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney as to form:
a. Bonds - All bonds shall be executed by a surety company authorized to transact business as a surety, and have an agent for service in California, together with an acceptable policy holder’s rating. The bond(s) shall contain the nearest street address of the institution providing the bond(s).
b. Cash Deposits - In lieu of the faithful performance and labor and material bonds, the developer may submit cash deposits or negotiable bonds of a kind approved for securing deposits of public monies under the conditions hereinafter described.
c. Disbursements from cash deposits shall be made in compliance with a separate agreement between the developer and the City. A bookkeeping fee of 1% of the total amount deposited with the City for each cash deposit shall be submitted with each security. Disbursements Item Number: 9.

Page 234 of 1104 ends

7 from a cash deposit in any instance shall not be permitted unless and until authorized in writing by the City Engineer.

32. All improvement agreements shall be approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Security for the agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney and Finance Director.

On-Site Street Improvements

33. The on-site driveways and parking areas shall be improved with asphalt or concrete paving, permeable pavers, curbs, gutters, and appurtenances as shown generally on the approved site plan. The thickness of pavement shall be determined by the applicant’s engineer based upon “R” value tests taken of the soils and appropriate traffic indices to be determined by the applicant’s engineer, all subject to approval by the City Engineer.

34. All on-site paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, ramps and other site work shall be constructed to City standards, subject to the improvement plans approved by the City Engineer.

35. The applicant/developer is required to construct all transition and missing links between existing and proposed improvements.

36. The proposed driveway shall be a radius driveway per City of Desert Hot Springs Standard No. 210.

37. The applicant/developer shall ensure that all existing improvements within the street right-of-way are not damaged during construction. Any improvements within the public right-of-way shall be replaced or repaired if deemed unacceptable due to damage during construction by the City Engineer.

Off-Site Street Improvements

38. All street improvements shall include construction of asphalt concrete pavement over base material, curb/gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, catch basins, storm drains, and fully landscaped and irrigated perimeter along the property frontages at the cost of the applicant.

39. Improvements shall include removal and construction of existing street improvements that are severely damaged and/or not in compliance with City Standards along 19th Avenue and Calle De Los Ramos.

40. All sidewalks, ramps, and landings shall be compliant with the Americans with Disability Act.

Item Number: 9.

Page 235 of 1104 ends

8 41. Proposed street stripping shall be per Caltrans Standards approved by the City Engineer.

42. The minimum grade on all proposed streets shall be 0.50% unless approved in advance, in writing, by the City Engineer.

43. The applicant/developer shall construct half width street improvements along the following streets:
a. Calle De Los Ramos from centerline to right-of-way (39 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping.
b. 19th Avenue from centerline to right-of-way (44 feet), including curb, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaping.

Drainage

44. The applicant/developer shall submit a project specific Hydrology Report, using Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Hydrology Manual for City review and approval, analyzing the 10-year and 100-year storm events and hydraulic analyses for the proposed drainage systems.

45. No Nuisance water shall escape the site onto public streets.

46. The applicant/developer shall provide on-site storm water retention basin(s) or system(s) designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Each retention basin shall include a sufficient number of underground vertical drywells designed to eliminate standing water in the basin. The retention basin shall be sized to mitigate the post-development storm water flow rate within the limits of the project to pre-development levels based on a 100- year storm event of 24-hour duration and shall completely drain/percolate any storm event within 72 hours. All upstream runoff from adjacent properties that has historically been directed onto the proposed project may be considered to pass through the project with the exception of historical retention that occurred on-site. The retention basin shall be designed with a maximum depth of 5 feet and maximum side slopes of 3:1 and shall not be used for purposes other than for the collection of storm water, nuisance water and well blow-off water. Alternate methods may be provided with the approval of the City Engineer.
a. Any other facilities required in the drainage/hydrology study shall be designed and installed as detailed in Section 15.68, Flood Plain Management, and Section 15.72 Floodplain Construction of the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code.
b. All retention basins/systems shall be located on site; off-site retention basins/systems are specifically prohibited.

Item Number: 9.

Page 236 of 1104 ends

9 c. Retention Basin Vehicular Access - Vehicular access shall be provided for maintenance of the retention basins to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall determine the need and/or design of such access. The grading of a “road” to the bottom shall comply with health and safety standards and shall meet the requisite design requirements including geometries and capacity of the basin(s). Maintenance of retention basins and drainage system shall be the responsibility of the Applicant/property owner/operator.

Retention basins with side slopes equal to or greater than 4:1 and equal to or less than 5 feet in depth will not require an access road to the bottom of the basin.

47. The applicant/developer shall prepare and submit a Project Specific Final Water Quality Management Plan pursuant to the Whitewater River Region Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff.

48. If the site is located in a Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) Flood Zone, structures on the property shall be protected from flood hazard.

A (FEMA) Elevation Certificate shall be provided to the Building Department prior to issuance of a grading permit and shall be resubmitted “as constructed" prior to final grading signoff.

49. The applicant/developer shall submit the project to the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers and the California Department of Fish and Game for approval of any development construction in the “Blue Line Stream” shown on the U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Map, Desert Hot Springs California, and obtain all required clearances and approvals.

Standard Planning Department Conditions

50. The applicant/developer shall implement all mitigation measures and monitoring program requirements outlined in the Environmental Documents.

51. At no time shall the combination of uses or activities conducted within the building exceed the total demand for parking, as calculated in the City’s Zoning Code and as provided onsite according to the approved site plan.

Any change to the floor plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Department.

52. The applicant/developer shall maintain the Project Site after the start of construction and until the Project is completed, free of weeds, debris, trash or any other offensive, unhealthful and dangerous material. If after five (5) days’ notice by certified mail, the applicant/ developer does not comply with the before mentioned criterion, the City may either cancel building or grading permits and/or enter the Project Site with City staff and remove all subject violations, bill the applicant /developer and/or put a lien on the Item Number: 9.

Page 237 of 1104 ends

10 Project Site.

53. The project site shall remain undisturbed until the applicant/developer is issued a grading permit.

54. Wheel stops within the parking lot are prohibited unless required for ADA compliance.

55. The applicant/developer shall construct a trash enclosure in location per the approved Site Plan. The trash enclosure shall be constructed to City Standards.

56. Outdoor storage of equipment and/or merchandise must satisfy all screening requirements of Sections 17.16.220 of the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code.

57. Outdoor sales are prohibited unless the applicant has a Temporary Use Permit approved subject to the provisions of Section 17.136 of the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code.

58. All drainpipes shall be interior to the building. Exposed drainpipes are specifically prohibited.

59. All drain terminations shall be from the Watts Drainage Product RD-940 or a product of equal value.

60. All breaker boxes, fire sprinkler risers, and utility conduits shall be interior to the building.

61. All Vapor Collection Systems at Service Stations shall be screened from public view.

62. All new commercial development shall comply with Mission Springs Water District’s Water Efficient Landscaping Guidelines (guidelines are available at www.mswd.org). This policy requires outdoor water conservation practices within MSWD’s service area, specifically: (1) the creation of landscape plans featuring the use of California native desert friendly plants; and (2) the preparation of irrigation plans detailing water efficient irrigation technology systems (e.g., drip irrigation, evapotranspiration irrigation controllers, etc.) appropriate to an arid desert climate.

63. Project shall have “Super Compliant” Architectural Coatings:
a. Prior to Building permit issuance the applicant shall submit evidence, such as emissions estimates, coating use estimates and
manufacturers specifications for VOC content, or other evidence that indicates VOC emissions during architectural coating activities would not exceed SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds.

Item Number: 9.

Page 238 of 1104 ends

11 b. Prior to Building permit issuance the applicant shall prepare a Coating Restriction Plan (CRP), consistent with SCAQMD guidelines. The project applicant/developer shall include in any construction contracts and/or subcontracts a requirement that Project contractors adhere to the requirements of the CRP. The CRP shall include a requirement that all interior and exterior residential and non-residential architectural coatings used in Project construction meet the SCAQMD “super compliant” coating VOC content standard of less than 10 grams of VOC per liter of coating. The CRP shall also specify the use of highvolume, low-pressure spray guns during coating applications to reduce coating waste.

64. Assess and Minimize Temporary Construction Noise Levels To ensure that the project implements appropriate construction noise controls, the applicant shall assess potential construction noise levels and minimize substantial adverse impacts by implementing feasible construction noise control measures that reduce construction noise levels at sensitive receptor locations, including nearby residences. Such measures include:
a. construction management techniques. This may include:
i. providing advance notice of construction activities to nearby noise-sensitive receptors
ii. Siting staging areas away from noise-sensitive land uses, iii. monitoring construction;
b. construction equipment controls. This may include:
i. ensuring equipment has mufflers,
ii. use of electric hook-ups instead of generators);
iii. use of temporary sound barriers (equipment enclosures, berms, walls, blankets, or other devices) when necessary; c. preparation of a plan, procedures, or other mechanisms to receive track, respond, and resolve construction noise complaints, including designation of an on-site appointee to handle such complaints, and report back to City staff; and
d. require monitoring construction noise levels if complaints are received to verify the need for additional noise controls.

Landscaping:

65. All redwood headers are specifically prohibited from use on the project site.

66. All irrigation lines shall be located below ground with no surface exposure.

67. All mechanical equipment, either roof or ground mounted, and shall be screened from public view. All such equipment shall be fully screened by the roof structure, a parapet wall, appropriate ground mounted walls, berming, or landscaping. All walls shall architecturally match the building.

Item Number: 9.

Page 239 of 1104 ends

12 Graffiti:

68. The applicant/developer shall keep the Project Site, clear of graffiti vandalism at all times. The applicant/developer shall contact the City’s Graffiti Hot Line at 888-562-3822 within 24 hours of discovering the graffiti vandalism.

69. The applicant/developer and/or successor(s) shall apply (and maintain) a protective coating or graffiti resistant material acceptable to the City’s Public Works and/or Community Development Department, to provide for the effective and expeditious removal of graffiti on all exterior building elevations and/or project walls and/or replacement of defaced screening panels.

70. In the event there is a change in the name, address or telephone number of the responsible person(s), firm or company, the applicant/developer or successor shall notify the City within 24 hours, in writing, of the change and provide the City with the current contact information of responsible person(s), firm or company.

71. The applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest shall be responsible for the removal of any graffiti vandalism from the project site (exterior building surfaces and/or exterior walls/fences) within 24-hour after discovering the graffiti vandalism or receipt of notice from the City of the same. The applicant/developer shall contact the City’s Graffiti Hot Line at 888-562-3822 within 24 hours of discovering the graffiti vandalism.

72. The applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest hereby agrees to allow the City and/or its agents to enter the property for the purpose of removing or painting over graffiti vandalism, if the applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest fail to remove the reported graffiti vandalism within the 24 hours of discovering the graffiti or receipt of notice from the City.

73. In the event that applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest, fail to remove the graffiti vandalism within 24 hours, requiring the City and/or its agents to enter the Project Site for the purpose of removing or painting over graffiti vandalism the applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest shall release the City and/or its agents from any liability for property damage or personal injury. And shall reimburse to the City all costs associated with the removal of the graffiti vandalism.

74. The applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest shall include the aforementioned authorizations to enter the project site for the purpose of removing or painting over graffiti vandalism as part of authorization agreement to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department and the approval of the City Attorney, as to form.

Item Number: 9.

Page 240 of 1104 ends

13 75. The applicant/developer and/or successor(s) in interest shall, to the extent feasible, have designed a building structure visible from any public or quasipublic place in such a manner to consider prevention of graffiti, including, but not limited to the following:
a. Use of additional lighting;
b. Use of non-solid fencing;
c. Use of landscaping designed to cover large expansive walls such as ivy or similar clinging vegetation; or
d. Use of architectural design to break up long, continuous wall or solid areas.

Lighting:

76. The applicant shall submit an exterior Lighting Plan in compliance with all relevant sections of the DHSMC, including a photometric analysis, to the City Planner for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit.

The Lighting Plan shall also identify the following:
a. Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the Project Site and shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and the public right-of-way.
b. All lighting outdoor lighting including fixtures shall direct lighting downward.
c. The type of fixtures, including height, material, and color. d. The total height of all freestanding lighting fixtures shall not exceed 18 feet.
e. All concrete fixture bases will have a decorative finish. At a minimum, a trowel finish shall be provided.
f. Bolts connecting the light fixture to the base shall be covered.

77. The applicant/developer shall apply for a separate permit for any proposed signage, in accordance with the provisions of the City’s Municipal Code.

Police Department Conditions

78. The applicant/developer shall comply with all applicable federal, state and City laws and regulations.

79. The applicant/developer shall incorporate all aspects of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design for visual surveillance, access control and territorial reinforcement.

80. Every area of the project site must be visible either from the street or from the structure. Unavoidable dead spaces or hidden/secluded areas require additional mitigating measures which may include increased lighting, hostile Item Number: 9.

Page 241 of 1104 ends

14 landscaping, security surveillance cameras, perimeter fencing and/or security gates, on-site security guards or other mitigating measures deemed appropriate by the Police Department.

81. The applicant and operator shall at all times implement the Utilize Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (C.P.T.E.D) throughout the project, as follows:

CPTED Principle #1 – Natural Surveillance
"See and be seen" is the overall goal when it comes to CPTED and natural surveillance. A person is less likely to commit a crime if they think someone will see them do it. Lighting and landscape play an important role in Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design.

CPTED Principle #2 - Natural Access Control
Natural Access Control is more than a high block wall topped with barbed wire. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design or CPTED utilizes the use of walkways, fences, lighting, signage and landscape to clearly guide people and vehicles to and from the proper entrances. The goal with this CPTED principle is not necessarily to keep intruders out, but to direct the flow of people while decreasing the opportunity for crime.

CPTED Principle #3 – Territorial Reinforcement
Creating or extending a "sphere of influence" by utilizing physical designs such as pavement treatments, landscaping and signage that enable users of an area to develop a sense of proprietorship over it is the goal of this CPTED principle. Public areas are clearly distinguished from private ones. Potential trespassers perceive this control and are thereby discouraged.

CPTED Principle #4 – Maintenance
CPTED and the "Broken Window Theory" suggests that one "broken window" or nuisance, if allowed to exist, will lead to others and ultimately to the decline of an entire neighborhood. Neglected and poorly maintained properties are breeding grounds for criminal activity. We will work with you to develop a formal CPTED based maintenance plan to help you preserve your property value and make it a safer place.

82. Prior to issuance of building permits, the site plan shall indicate all perimeter walls and fences to be of a design to prevent or discourage scaling and graffiti.

83. Prior to issuance of building permits, the landscape plan shall be amended to assure that drought tolerant “hostile vegetation” shall be used when possible under windows and around the fence line.

84. Any private security service that uses security guards with uniforms shall assure to the satisfaction of the City of Desert Hot Springs Police Item Number: 9.

Page 242 of 1104 ends

15 Department that the uniforms are sufficiently different in appearance from any uniform of the Police Department, Riverside County Sheriff or other local police department.

Fire Department Conditions

85. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering a fire flow of 2,625 gallons per minute for a 2-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the construction site. Fire flow is based on Type III-B construction protected with an automatic fire sprinkler system. Due to building construction type and fire sprinkler credits, fire flow requirements may be revised as determined by future building plans. California Fire Code (CFC) 507.3

86. Fire flow availability verification shall be obtained from the local water authority in the proximity of the above noted project. Verification shall be provided to the Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal prior to building permit issuance. CFC 507.3

87. Fire Hydrant(s) location and spacing shall comply with CFC 507.5 and Table C102.1. Fire hydrant(s) shall be located not to exceed their allotted distances apart in any direction as measured by an approved route around the building including their maximum distance from any point on a street or road frontage. Fire hydrants shall provide the required fire flow. Distance requirements for the fire hydrants may change when updated fire flow is calculated. CFC 507.1

88. Prior to Building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall furnish required copies of the water system fire hydrant plans to Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow CFC 507.1. An approved water supply for fire protection during construction shall be made available prior to the arrival of combustible materials on site. CFC 3312

89. All proposed traffic calming elements for this development shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. Roadway design features (speed bumps, speed humps, speed control dips, cushions etc.), which may interfere with emergency apparatus responses, shall not be installed on fire access roadways, unless they meet design criteria approved by Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal. CFC 503.4.1

90. The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a precise grading plan. Access lanes will not have an up, or Item Number: 9.

Page 243 of 1104 ends

16 downgrade of more than 12%. Access will not be less than twenty-four feet (24’) in width and will have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13’6”. Access lanes shall be designed to withstand the weight of 60,000 pounds over two axles and 75,000 pounds over three axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface to provide all weather driving capabilities. Streets shall be constructed in accordance with the City of Desert Hot Springs Engineering Street Standards. CFC 503.2

91. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles.

The applicant or developer shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval; a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane printing and/or signs. Required identification standard/guidelines handout shall be obtained from Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal. CFC 503

92. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around the fire apparatus constructed with turnarounds and or hammerheads. Fire apparatus shall be capable of maneuvering through the site with a minimum inside radius of 14’-0” and outside of 38’-0” throughout. CFC 503.2.5

93. Knox Box and Gate Access: Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box.

The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Electric gate operators shall be provided with Knox key switches. Electric gate operators shall also be connected to a remote signal receiver compatible for use with the preemption devices on the Riverside County fire apparatus. The gate shall automatically open upon receiving a remote signal from the fire apparatus and remain in the fully open position for a minimum of 30 seconds. Ref. CFC 506.1

94. All new commercial structures 3,600 square feet or larger shall be protected with a fire sprinkler system. Based on information provided for the building, an approved commercial fire sprinkler system designed by a current licensed C-16 contractor in accordance with NFPA 13 is required. Plans must be submitted with current fee to Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. CFC 903.2 as amended by the City of Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code

95. The applicant/developer shall be responsible to install a U. L. Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System, per NFPA 72. Monitoring system shall monitor the fire sprinkler system(s) water flow, post indicator valves and all control valves. Plans must be submitted with current permit fee to Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. Additional fire alarm systems may be required Item Number: 9.

Page 244 of 1104 ends

17 but will be determined when additional information is provided at construction plan review. CFC 903.4

96. Display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and rear access if applicable. Building address numbers shall be a minimum of 12” for building(s) up to 25’ in height and 24” in height for building(s) exceeding 25’ in height. In complexes with alpha designations, letter size must match numbers. All addressing must be legible, of a contrasting color, and adequately illuminated to be visible from street at all hours. Address numbers shall be a durable type of material to withstand all weather harming conditions. Reference CFC Section 505.1 as amended by the City of Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code and the County of Riverside Premises Identification Standard.

97. Propose rack storage and high pile combustible storage shall be reviewed and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Submittals shall include a Fire Engineer Technical Report in compliance with CFC amended section 3204.2.1.

98. Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Systems: Projects that do not meet the exceptions set forth by the Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal shall provide plans for an emergency responder radio coverage system.

Ref. CFC 510.1 and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Technical Policy #TP19-002

99. During the construction of this project, the site address shall be clearly posted at the job site entrance. This will enable incoming emergency equipment and the inspectors to locate the job site from the assigned street location. Numbers shall be a minimum of 12 inches in height. CFC 505.1 100. Fire safety during construction shall be in accordance with Chapter 33 of the CFC. An approved vehicle access, either permanent or temporary, shall be provided during construction. CFC 3310.1
101. Conditions subject to change with adoption of new codes, ordinances, or when buildings permits are not obtained within twelve (12) months. All final fire department conditions will be addressed when detailed site and building plans are submitted and reviewed. Compliance with California Fire and Building Codes shall be required.
102. Nothing in Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal’s review shall be construed as encompassing structural integrity. Review of this plan does not authorize or approve any omission or deviation from all applicable regulations. All questions regarding the meaning of these code requirements should be referred to Riverside County Fire Department Office of the Fire Marshal at 760-863-8886.

Item Number: 9.

Page 245 of 1104 ends

18 Building & Safety Department Conditions
103. The project shall comply with the adopted California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) and other adopted City Ordinances which include the following:
a. CA Building Code
b. CA Plumbing Code
c. CA Mechanical Code
d. CA Electrical Code
e. CA Fire Code
f. CA Green Building Standards Code
g. CA Energy Code
104. As applicable, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in all new construction as per Chapter 9 of the California Building Code and per City Ordinance. Design and type of system shall be based upon the requirements of the California Building Code, the California Fire Code and the requirements of the Fire Department.
105. The requirements of the Department of Environmental Health Services and the Air Quality Management District shall be satisfied prior to the issuance of any permit if hazardous materials are stored and/or used. 106. Any temporary building, trailer, commercial coach, etc. installed and/or used in connection with a construction project shall obtain a Temporary Use Permit and comply with the City of Desert Hot Springs requirements. 107. All perimeter/boundary walls shall be designed and constructed so that the outer/exterior face of the wall is as close as possible to the property line. In any case, the outer/exterior face of the wall shall be within two (2) inches of the property line. Distances greater than two (2) inches may be approved prior to construction by the Building Official on a case-by-case basis for extenuating circumstances.
108. All property lines, easement lines, etc. shall be located and/or relocated in such a manner as to not cause any existing structure to become non-conforming with the requirements of the latest adopted edition of the Building Code, or any other applicable law, ordinance, or code.

Mission Springs Water District Conditions
109. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map 37606.

Water Service
Item Number: 9.

Page 246 of 1104 ends

19 Water conditions may change depending on the status of water improvements by Project Viento (DP 21-14 dated 2/24/22) or by Parcel Map 37606. Water service is currently available for the project subject to the following conditions of service:
110. The developer shall comply with all rules, laws, ordinances, guidelines, and regulations of the District at the time that any new water service application is submitted. MSWD ordinance requires that water service, including irrigation and fire services, shall not cross parcel boundaries to serve a second property.
111. The point of connection for domestic and fire services shall be the existing 12” ductile iron water main tee located on the west side of Calle De Los Romos, south of the centerline of 19th Avenue.
112. The developer shall design and construct 12’’ minimum diameter iron water main in 16th avenue to the projects east boundary, terminating with a blow off assembly 5’ east of any pavement.
113. The developer shall be responsible to design and construct all improvements at their expense.
114. The installation of backflow prevention devices is required for all nonresidential domestic, fire, and irrigation service connections. 115. Installation of private fire line services may be required per Riverside County Fire Department Standards. Double check detector assemblies (DCDA) per MSWD Standards will be a requirement at the time of installation. 116. The developer must submit hydraulic calculations to the District indicating the availability of the required fire flows as determined by the Riverside County Fire Department. These calculations shall be based on a current fire hydrant flow test which can be ordered through the MSWD Engineering Department.
117. The developer shall comply with all District standards, specifications and conditions, final approval of all design plans shall be by the District Engineer or his/her designee, and the District’s General Manager. 118. The developer shall provide plumbing plans with fixture units for District review of meter and service size.
119. MSWD requires having all its facilities within the public right-of-way or recorded and dedicated easements.
120. The developer is required to apply for water service and submit payment of District fees, charges, and deposits. The water meter and connection fees will be based on the actual meter sizes and quantities shown on the Item Number: 9.

Page 247 of 1104 ends

20 approved plans. All fees are subject to change based on the time of application for services from the District.
121. The developer will be required to bond all infrastructure and be required to supply a warranty bond for the infrastructure. The warranty bond will be released 1 year from the Districts acceptance of the infrastructure or any required warranty repair.

Sewer Service
Sewer service is currently unavailable to the subject property from MSWD. Public sewer service will be available to the District’s Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility (RWTF) in the fall of 2023. Interim septic or storage system will need the approval of the California State Water Resources Control Board and shall be designed to protect the ground water.
122. The developer shall comply with all rules, laws, ordinances, guidelines, and regulations of the District at the time the sewer service application is submitted.
123. The developer/property owner shall complete an application for sewer service with payment of all applicable fees, charges and deposits at the time of application (i.e., multi-family, residential, commercial sewer connection fees per current MSWD fee schedules).
124. The developer shall be required to design and construct any new sewer to connect to sewer once sewer service to the RWTF is active. 125. MSWD requires a 6” minimum diameter sewer lateral for all commercial or multifamily residential buildings with four or more units. 126. The developer shall flush all private onsite sewer lines under direct District inspection prior to connection to the 6” lateral.
127. The developer shall comply with all the District standards, specifications and conditions, and have final approval of all design plans by the District Engineer or his/her designee, and the District General Manager. 128. MSWD requires submittal of proposed plumbing plans showing all connections to the public sewer system and the size and location of the proposed lateral for the project.
129. MSWD will require a Report of Waste Discharge for the project. The report shall be prepared by a qualified Licensed Professional Engineer in accordance with requirements currently in use by the California State Water Item Number: 9.

Page 248 of 1104 ends

21 Resources Control Board. Note, MSWD does not currently accept process wastewater (i.e., irrigation tailwater, hydroponic wastewater, etc.) as it may contain excessive salinity, nutrients, and other constituents. MSWD will review the wastewater quality and determine if any pretreatment process may be required once process wastewater is accepted at its wastewater treatment facilities.
130. The developer will be required to bond all infrastructure with MSWD for 100% payment and performance bonds. Said bonds shall be replaced by a warranty bond of 10% of the bond amount upon final acceptance of improvements by MSWD. Said warranty bond shall remain in effect for 12 months from the date of acceptance of from the date of completion of any required warranty repairs.

Landscape
As applicable per City requirements:

All new and rehabilitated residential and commercial development shall comply with the Mission Springs Water District’s Water Efficient Landscaping Guidelines (guidelines are available at www.mswd.org). This policy requires outdoor water conservation practices within the MSWD service area, specifically: (1) the creation of landscape plans featuring the use of California native desert friendly plants; and (2) the preparation of irrigation plans detailing water efficient irrigation technology systems (e.g., drip irrigation, evapotranspiration irrigation controllers, etc.) appropriate to an arid desert climate. For additional details regarding plan check and inspection fees, please contact Engineering via email at [email protected] or (760) 329-6448 ext. 127.

END
Item Number: 9.

Page 249 of 1104 ends

SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY OWNER SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP THE DESIGNER SHALL BE ADVISED OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS IN THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR / SUB-CONTRACTORS TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, DETAILS, AND FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, AND TO ADVISE THE DESIGNER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SITE CONDITIONS. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR INSURING THAT ALL MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE UNIFORM ELECTRICAL CODE, THE UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, AND THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AS WELL AS ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY AND BUILDING OFFICIAL. DETAILS AND CONDITIONS NOTED AS "TYPICAL" SHALL BE CAREFULLY CONSIDERED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND THE CONTRACTOR / SUB-CONSTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE DESIGNER OF ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICT. ENCROACHMENT PERMITS FROM THE PROPER GOVERNING AGENCY ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF ANY SUBSURFACE, SURFACE, OR OVERHEAD STRUCTURES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE ENCROACHMENT PERMITS BE APPROVED AND OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY GRADING AND/OR BUILDING PERMITS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH THE WORK TO PROPERLY COORDINATE WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES, AND TO NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY DEFECTS OR DEFICIENCIES IN PREVIOUS WORK BY OTHERS WHICH IS NOT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OR WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECTS THE QUALITY OF SUBSEQUENT WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS SHALL BE AT ALL TIMES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE LAW, AND SHALL MAINTAIN CURRENT LICENSES THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE COURSE OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK, ALL APPLICABLE WARRANTIES, GUARANTIES, MANUALS, REGISTRATION FORMS, AND OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND INSTALLATIONS ON THE JOB. PREPARATION AND TREATMENT OF SOIL AT THE SITE SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF A QUALIFIED GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER TO UNDERTAKE ALL SITEWORK, GRADING AND FOUNDATION PREPARATION IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANS. GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL AT NO TIME ALLOW DRAINAGE TO FLOW TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. FINISH GRADE OF THE SITE, SUBSEQUENT TO COMPLETION OF ALL STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, AND LANDSCAPING, SHALL DIRECT SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM THE BUILDING FOUNDATIONS A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF FIVE FEET, THENCE, VIA SURFACE SWALES AND/OR UNDERGROUND DRAINS, TOWARD AND INTO APPROVED DRAINAGE WAYS. ALL SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND CHAPTERS 18 AND 33 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. DESIGNER J. VILLA & COMPANY INC. 29433 COLE GRADE ROAD VALLEY CENTER, CA 92082 PH: (760)-688-7430 E-MAIL: [email protected] JVillaCompany.com BUILDER GENERAL PLAN NOTES DESIGN CRITERIA AREA TABULATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION SITE THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CITY ADOPTED CODES AND AMENDMENTS: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) AND/OR 2019 GREEN BUILDING STANDARD CODE (CALGREEN) 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC) 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC) 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS (CBEES) PROPOSED FRONT EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION T1 TITLE 24 ENERGY CALCULATION Revisions Description Date TITLE SHEET ZONE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-L) CONSTRUCTION TYPE 3B SPRINKLED OCCUPANCY S-1 NON SEPARATED MIXED USE PER 2019 CBC TABLE 506.2 MAX ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA = 75,000 S.F. OCCUPANCY S-1, TYPE 3B, SPRINKLED SINGLE STORY BUILDING HEIGHT & SETBACKS PER ALLOWED ZONING "LI" ON SHEET A001 PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT = 36'-0" VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com M.E.P. ENGINEERING & DESIGN ALPHA MEP ENGINEERING JEREMY HATFIELD, PE 714-982-1787 [email protected] C
CH
ASAR
I TE
R
T
SE
Y
L
O
I CEN
A. D
A
R O
A
L I F
I N A
E
O
F C
S
T ATREN. 9-17 NO. C20350
R
O
jVillaCompany.com LOT AREA: A.P.N. 663-270-004 14.62 AC. NET 19 th AVENUE , DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CALIF. 92240 PROPOSED NEW 1 STORY CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS FOR MOVING & STORAGE PODS AND DISTRIBUTION OFFICE 13310 LITTLE MORONGO ROAD. DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 99401 APN 663-270-004 BLOCK 270 MAP 663 N.T.S - SEE SHEET A001 T1 TITLE / INFO SHEET A001 SITE PLAN L1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ESO1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN ES02 PHOTOMETRIC LIGHT DISTRIBUTION A101 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN A102 OFFICE FLOOR PLAN DETAIL A103 ROOF PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A202 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES A203 COLORED ELEVATIONS A204 COLORED ELEVATIONS A301 BUILDING SECTIONS E101 FLOOR PLAN - POWER E201 FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING E401 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN ELECTRICAL S1 STRUCTURAL NOTES AND LEGENDS S2 FOUNDATION PLAN S3 INTERIOR WALL PANEL ELEVATIONS S4 INTERIOR WALL PANEL ELEVATIONS SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC DAVID SNIDER 730 ARCADY ROAD SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 (216) 785-0011 [email protected] 19th AVENUE DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 99401 ENGINEER OF WORK PODS MOVING AND STORAGE DISTRIBUTION CENTER TENANT INFORMATION PRELIM 5-04-2022

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC DAVID SNIDER 730 ARCADY ROAD SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 (216) 785-0011
[email protected] TO BE DETERMINED: LEASED BY: SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC MR. DAVID SNIDER 730 ARCADY ROAD SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 (216) 785-0011
[email protected] BUILDING LEVEL 1 60,000 S.F. GROSS AREA

NEW COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240
PODS MOVING & STORAGE, D.H.S ALPHA MEP ENGINEERING JEREMY HATFIELD, PE 714-982-1787 [email protected] DENMARK ENGINEERING CLIFFORD T. DENMARK, PE 619-565-5942 [email protected] Item Number: 9.

Page 250 of 1104 ends

19TH AVENUE

PROPOSED BUILDING

POD WAREHOUSE
60,000 SF (TOTAL)
Ex. C/L & Project Boundary NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING CALLE DE LOS RAMOS 32' 5' 7' 23.6' 44' Prop. Sidewalk
28' 5' 6' 7' 30' 18' 10' 9' TYP.

Prop. Gate 18' 6.5' 30'
9'
TYP. 210' 67.3'
260' 6' 30' 27.705' 18' 128.1' 34.3' 6'
18' 9' TYP. 35.2'
143' 64.5' 68.5'
Ex. Project Boundary
Ex. Sewer Main
Prop. Curb & Gutter
Prop. Project Boundary Ex. Project Boundary
Prop. Sidewalk
Prop. Curb & Gutter
Ex. Gas
Ex. C/L
Ex. Water Main
Prop.

Gate
Prop. Underground
Retention (Typ.)
5' 5' 5' 6'
3 30' 244'
A
10'
1 39'
N 00°30'43" E 425.19'
N 88°51'06" E 382.93'
N 00°44'53" W 451.33'
N 89°15'29" E 368.28' N 46°18'24" W 33.60'
Prop. Wrought Iron or
Tubular Steel Fence (Typ.)
Prop. Wrought Iron or
Tubular Steel Fence (Typ.)
Prop. Retention Basin
Prop. UndergroundRetention (Typ.)
18' 19' 18' 269' 18' 6.1'
13' 30' 35.1'
93 39'
B
B
A A
10' 12' 12'
39' IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
78' ULTIMATE R/W
39' PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
12' 10' 11'
5' 6' 6' 5'
11'

SECTION A-A

CALLE DE LOS ROMOS
(Industrial Collector)
N.T.S.
(PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD 111)

FUTURE R/W

BY OTHERS
PROP.

R/W
PROP. PAINTED
MEDIAN

LANE LANE LANE LANE
& GUTTER
PROP. CURB
PROP.

SIDEWALK
PROP. LANDSCAPE

PARKWAY
CL
12' 12' 12'
44' IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS
88' ULTIMATE R/W
44' PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CL
PROP. SIDEWALK
PROP. CURB &
GUTTER

FUTURE SIDEWALK

FUTURE CURB &
GUTTER
8' 12' 12' 12' 8'

SECTION B-B
19TH AVENUE
(Major Arterial)
N.T.S.
(PER CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS GENERAL PLAN)
PROP.

R/W

FUTURE R/W

BY OTHERS

LANE LANE LANE LANE BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
PROP. LANDSCAPE

PARKWAY

TECHNICAL SITE PLAN

DATA TABLE
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 666-360-017
EXHIBIT DATE: JULY 13, 2022
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:

ADDRESS:

INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: FEBRUARY 20, 2015
EXHIBIT PREPARER:

ADDRESS:

MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270
CONTACT: PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE: (760) 320-9811

REVISIONS
NO. DATE

IN THE CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

DESCRIPTION
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
SHEET
SHEETS
1 OF
1 TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252
APPLICANT:

ADDRESS:

CONTACT:
730 ARCADY ROAD
MONTECITO, CALIFORNIA 93108

DAVID SNIDER

ALMAR MANAGEMENT, LLC
PUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS

MISSION SPRINGS WATER DISTRICT

SPECTRUM

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT

EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE -
EXISTING ZONING:

PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-L)

INDUSTRIAL (I)
LAND USE DESCRIPTION: ACREAGE
ZONE "X": 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD & AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD

AS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBER: 06065C0895G
FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:

EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008.

LIQUEFACTION: MODERATE LIQUEFACTION ZONE
NOTE: 1.

INDUSTRIAL (I)
(760) 324-4991
(800) 427-2200
(800) 921-8101
(760) 329-6448
(877) 719-3278
(760) 398-2651
(800) 227-2600
ELECTRIC:

GAS:

TELEPHONE:

WATER:

CABLE:

SEWER:

USA:

THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.

PROPOSED NET ACREAGE 100%
PROPOSED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION - (CALLE DE LOS RAMOS & 19TH AVENUE)

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-L)
A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 4 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

POD WAREHOUSE 80 STALLS
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 93 STALLS
COUNT
1 STALL PER 750 SF
-

PARKING RATIO
60,000 SF
-

BUILDING SF
100%
ONSITE PARKING DATA: PERCENTAGE

PROPOSED BUILDING (POD WAREHOUSE)
LANDSCAPE AREAS & RETENTION BASIN 23,771 SF 0.54 AC. 13% LAND USE DATA: SF AREA PERCENTAGE
SURROUNDING LAND USES:

NORTH: VACANT LAND (ZONED: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
SOUTH: VACANT LAND (ZONED: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
EAST: VACANT LAND (ZONED: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
WEST: COMMERCIAL (ZONED: SPECIFIC PLAN)
ACCESS ROADS, HARDSCAPE & PARKING 90,457 SF 2.08 AC. 52% TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED - - 80 STALLS 100%
-
EAST
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST

CENTERLINE

EASEMENT

EXISTING
(E)
(N)
(S)
(W)
C/L
ESMT.

EX.

ABBREVIATIONS

AC ACREAGE

C&G CURB AND GUTTER

APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER

E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT
A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE
MIN. MINIMUM
MAX. MAXIMUM

EXISTING IRRIGATION

EXISTING GAS

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING ELECTRIC

EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE

EXISTING CABLE

EXISTING CONTOURS

EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS
LEGEND
X

EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA

EXISTING LOT LINE

EXISTING TELEPHONE

BNDRY BOUNDARY

EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
M.B. MAP BOOK
1 EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES:

DESERT HOT SPRINGS PER P.M. 248/90-92. (PLOTTED HEREON) 39' EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF

EXISTING SEWER

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED EASEMENT

EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN

EXISTING WATER

PROPOSED LOT LINE

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY
NUMBER

PROPOSED

RIGHT OF WAY

TYPICAL
NO.

PROP.

R/W
TYP.

P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

SF SQUARE FEET

R RADIUS
STD. STANDARD

P/L PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE

R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)

UG UNDERGROUND

O/H OVERHEAD

OS/PP OPEN SPACE / PARKS
PG. PAGE

EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE
60,000 SF 1.38 AC. 35%
2 DESERT HOT SPRINGS PER P.M. 248/90-92. (PLOTTED HEREON) 44' EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF 3 WATER DISTRICT REC. 4/3/2018 AS DOC NO. 2018-0223211. (PLOTTED HEREON) 30' EASEMENT FOR SEWER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF MISSION SPRINGS

A (PLOTTED HEREON)
10' PRIVATE WATER EASEMENT.

LAND OWNER:

ADDRESS: 730 ARCADY ROAD
MONTECITO, CALIFORNIA 93108

ALMAR MANAGEMENT, LLC

X PROPOSED PARKING STALLS

4.84 AC.

ACREAGE

4.00 AC.

0.84 AC.
211,032 SF

ACREAGE
174,228 SF
36,804 SF
N.T.S.

VICINITY MAP
19TH AVE. INDIAN CANYON DR.
18TH AVE.
20TH AVE.

INDIAN
GARNET AVE.

AVE.

INTERSTATE CALLE DE
CITY OF 10 LOS ROMOS

SITE LITTLE MORONGO ROAD

PALM SPRINGS

CITY OF

DESERT HOT

SPRINGS

COUNTY OF

RIVERSIDE
R:\2767\Acad\Planning\Site Plan\2767 Technical Site Plan.dwg, 7/13/2022 7:41:59 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.

Item Number: 9.

Page 251 of 1104 ends

X X X X X X X X X X X X
X
X
X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X X

X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X
X X X
CL

DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA
LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR:

S H E E T
SCALE:

REVISION

L A N D S C A P E D E S I G N

DESERT MODERN
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES BY: Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue
Commercial Building
0' 40'
SCALE 1"=20'-0"
20' 60' 80'
Item Number: 9.

Page 252 of 1104 ends

19 th Avenue
Calle De Los Romos ELEC. ROOM CONFERENCE LOBBYOFFICE OFFICE STOR. BREAK ROOM I.T. (6) 10' x 12' knock out door panels P2 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4P4 P4P4 P5 P5 P4P2 P4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 PH1-41 PH1-42 PH1-43 P4 J GATE CLOSER PL1-33,35
1 J PL1-33,35 GATE CLOSER
1 SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL Revisions Description Date
VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com jVillaCompany.com

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue

COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240 G E N E R A L N O T E S C O D E D N O T E S 1. PROVIDE 30AMP-2 POLE CIRCUIT TO SITE GATE CLOSER. EXTEND A SEPARATE 1" CONDUIT TO GATE CONTROLLER TO EACH GATE OPERATOR AND A 1" CONDUIT TO THE BUILDING FOR (IF REQUIRED FOR OPERATION, COORDINATE REQUIREMENTS WITH GC). PROVIDE A 3/4", 10' COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD NEXT TO EACH GATE OPERATOR, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 1 1"=20'-0" 0 10' 20' 40'
N SITE PLAN - ELECTRICAL ES01 A. SEE NOTES ON SHEET E000. B. POLE LIGHT FIXTURE(S) AT 25' AFF.(UNO.) AND WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE(S) AT 20' AFF.(UNO.) Item Number: 9.

Page 253 of 1104 ends

19 th Avenue
Calle De Los Romos ELEC. ROOM CONFERENCE LOBBYOFFICE OFFICE STOR. BREAK ROOM I.T. (6) 10' x 12' knock out door panels P2 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4P4 P4P4 P4 P4 P4P2 P2 P4 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.7 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.3 4.8 5.1 5.1 4.0 4.5 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.7 4.0 4.4 5.0 5.3 4.3 5.0 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.2 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.1 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.4 3.2 2.6 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.3 4.1 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.1 2.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 4.6 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.0 3.6 3.3 3.0 2.3 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.4 3.8 3.9 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.2 2.9 3.4 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.6 5.2 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.7 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.8 4.3 4.9 5.6 4.7 4.2 4.1 4.5 4.2 3.7 3.4 3.0 2.7 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.7 4.3 4.9 5.6 4.7 4.4 4.0 4.5 4.1 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.6 1.9 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.6 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.9 4.6 5.2 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.0 3.5 3.1 2.7 2.4 1.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.9 4.7 4.3 4.1 4.0 4.1 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.4 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.2 2.9 2.5 2.2 1.7 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.1 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.0 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.8 1.9 2.4 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.4 2.8 3.8 3.7 3.3 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.2 3.0 4.5 4.6 4.2 3.7 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.7 4.2 4.8 4.9 4.2 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 2.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.5 4.1 4.6 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.9 4.3 4.1 3.8 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.6 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.5 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.7 4.0 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.8 4.1 4.1 4.4 4.0 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.5 4.1 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.3 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.2 3.9 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.5 3.2 3.6 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.4 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.8 3.9 4.4 4.7 4.3 4.3 3.8 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.1 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.2 3.2 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.0 3.8 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.1 2.9 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.0 2.4 1.5 4.5 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.3 3.0 3.7 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.8 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.1 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.7 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.1 3.9 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.6 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.7 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.7 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.7 3.2 3.4 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.4 3.6 3.4 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.7 2.5 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.2 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.0 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.2 2.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.2 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.2 4.3 4.1 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.6 3.0 3.5 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.8 4.1 4.2 4.0 3.5 2.9 2.5 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.1 3.7 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.0 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.8 3.3 2.7 2.3 P2 P4 P4 P4 P4 P4P4 P4P4 P5 P5 P4P2 P4 W4 W4 W4W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 PH1-41 PH1-42 PH1-43 P4 BUILDING OFF SITE CALCULATION ZONE SITE PLAN(PARKING AREA) CALCULATION ZONE SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATION Revisions Description Date VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com jVillaCompany.com

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue

COMMERCIAL BUILDING,
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240 G E N E R A L N O T E S C O D E D N O T E S 1. NOT IN USE. 1 1"=20'-0" 0 10' 20' 40'
N SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATION ES02 A. SEE NOTES ON SHEET E000. B. POLE LIGHT FIXTURE(S) AT 25' AFF.(UNO.) AND WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE(S) AT 20' AFF.(UNO.) Statistics Description Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min PARKING AREA 2.5 fc 6.3 fc 0.6 fc 10.5:1 4.2:1 BLDG OFF SITE AREA 0.3 fc 2.0 fc 0.0 fc NA NA Item Number: 9.

Page 254 of 1104 ends

open warehouse floor
PODS storage
28' height to lowest truss
(60) 10' x 12' knock out door panels STOR.
27'-4" 52'-4" 52'-4" 52'-4" 52'-4"
210'-0"
4"
4" 4" 51'-10" 51'-10" 51'-10" 51'-10" 51'-10" 4" 260'-0" 4" 51'-10" 4" 52'-6" I.T. 20' x 20' roll up garage doors 20' x 20' roll up garage doors CONFERENCE 12'-0" x 19'-6" ELEC. ROOM 10'-0" x 15'-6" OFFICE 10'-0" x 15'-0" OFFICE 10'-0" x 12'-6" BREAK ROOM 10'-0" x 16'-8" LOBBY 9'-6" x 18'-0" 52'-6" 154'-11" 18'-1" 117'-10" 19'-0" 9'-0" 18'-0" 4' x 8' SKYLIGHTS TYP. P4 P4 P2 P2 A301 A
A301 BA301 B A301 A
A301 C ROOF LADDER
3/8" PER FT. SLOPE 3/8" PER FT. SLOPE RIDGE VALLEY VALLEY 3/8" PER FT. SLOPE
3/8" PER FT. SLOPE
PARAPET ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF TYPICAL 4' x 8' S.L. TYPICAL CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PARAPET TYPICAL 4' x 8' S.L. ROOF ACCESS HATCH PER DETAIL 01 / A103 TESTED ABS ROOF DRAIN w/ 2" RAISED SCUPPER OVERFLOW MIN. 1 4" / ft. SLOPE CRICKET TO DRAINS SOUTH ROOF DRAINS - PIPE TO SOUTH RETENTION BASIN PER MECHANICAL PLAN TESTED ABS ROOF DRAIN w/ 2" RAISED SCUPPER OVERFLOW MIN. 14" / ft. SLOPE CRICKET TO DRAINS A101 Revisions Description Date PODS BUILDING SHELL PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0" VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc. FLOOR PLAN
jVillaCompany.com NOTE: ALL MAIN EXTERIOR DOORS OF BUILDING OCCUPANCY TYPE: "B" & "F-2" TO HAVE SIGN POSTED ON EGRESS SIDE ADJACENT TO OR ON DOORS: "THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED" TACTILE SIGN SHALL BE LOCATED ALONGSIDE THE DOOR OF THE LATCH SIDE. TACTILE CHARACTERS ON SIGNS SHALL BE LOCATED 48" MIN. A.F.F. OR GROUND SURFACE, MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF THE LOWEST BRAILLE CELLS AND 60" MAX. AF.F. OR GROUND, MEASURED FROM BASELINE OF HIGHEST LINE OF RAISED CHARACTERS. JVillaCompany.com C
CH
ASAR
I TE
R
T
SE
Y
L
O
I CEN
A. D
A
R O
A
L I F
I N A
E
O
F C
S
T ATREN. 9-23 NO. C20350
R
O

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected] REV 4-04-2022 PROPOSED 60,000 S.F. 29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com EMERGENCY EM battery back up (90 MIN MINIMUM) EMERGENCY ES battery back up (90 MIN MINIMUM) CEIL. LIGHT EXIT SIGN FH FIRE EXTINGUISHER WALL MOUNT TS TACTILE SIGN WALL MOUNT TACTILE BRAILLE SIGNS PER CBC. (located on latch side) ES EMERGENCY EXIT battery back up SIGN w/ DIRECTIONAL ARROW (90 MIN MINIMUM) SEE 01/A015 REV 4-06-2022 REV 4-15-2022

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240 SEE SHEET A102 FOR FLOOR PLAN DETAIL 48" x 96" SKYLIGHT 3% OF (.7h) NET AREA PER PER 2019 BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS ES ES ESESES ES ES ESESES ES ES EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE Item Number: 9.

Page 255 of 1104 ends

H20 Fountain ELKAY LZSTL8WSLP ADA ACCESABLE BOTTLE STATION STOR. 52'-6" 27'-8" I.T. 16'-2"
31'-6"
11'-0" 9'-10" 10'-8" MOP SINK 20' x 20' roll up garage doors 7'-0" 4'-0" 6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-2" 4'-6" CONFERENCE 12'-0" x 19'-6" ELEC. ROOM 10'-0" x 15'-6" OFFICE 10'-0" x 15'-0" OFFICE 10'-0" x 12'-6" BREAK ROOM 10'-0" x 16'-8" LOBBY 9'-6" x 18'-0" 19'-10" 16'-7" 10'-2" 9'-8" 3'-5" 9'-9" 3'-5" 12' x 16' TALL STOREFRONT 20' x 16' TALL STOREFRONT
w/ 3280 DOUBLE FRENCH

ENTRY DOORS
11'-2" 11'-4" 5'-2" 13'-7" 2'-7" 2'-9" 8'-4" 8'-8" 2'-6" 14'-1" COFFEE BAR 4' x 8' SKYLIGHTS TYP. ROOF LADDER A102 Revisions Description Date VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc. FLOOR PLAN
JVillaCompany.com
L
D
Y C 64428 Exp. 06/30/23
T
T E
A
O
G
S
E R E
R E

I S E T

OH NA T
N
N

C I V I L F CA L R
F O I
NE A E
I
J . HRA
KEN

E E R NI G
O
P

R F E S S I A
O N

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected] REV
29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com 4-25-2022 PROPOSED 60,000 S.F. EMERGENCY EM battery back up (90 MIN MINIMUM) EMERGENCY ES battery back up (90 MIN MINIMUM) CEIL. LIGHT EXIT SIGN FH FIRE EXTINGUISHER WALL MOUNT TS TACTILE SIGN WALL MOUNT TACTILE BRAILLE SIGNS PER CBC. (located on latch side) ES EMERGENCY EXIT battery back up SIGN w/ DIRECTIONAL ARROW (90 MIN MINIMUM) SEE 01/A015 PODS BUILDING FLOOR PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240
Item Number: 9.

Page 256 of 1104 ends

P4 P4P4 P4 P4 P2 P2 P4 P4P4 A301 A
A301 BA301 B A301 A
A301 C
3/8" PER FT. SLOPE 3/8" PER FT. SLOPE RIDGE VALLEY VALLEY 3/8" PER FT. SLOPE
3/8" PER FT. SLOPE
PARAPET ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF ECU-01 ON ROOF TYPICAL 4' x 8' S.L. TYPICAL CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PARAPET TYPICAL 4' x 8' S.L. ROOF ACCESS HATCH PER DETAIL 01 / A103 TESTED ABS ROOF DRAIN w/ 2" RAISED SCUPPER OVERFLOW MIN. 1 4" / ft. SLOPE CRICKET TO DRAINS SOUTH ROOF DRAINS - PIPE TO SOUTH RETENTION BASIN PER MECHANICAL PLAN TESTED ABS ROOF DRAIN w/ 2" RAISED SCUPPER OVERFLOW MIN. 14" / ft. SLOPE CRICKET TO DRAINS A103 Revisions Description Date VBuilding Design & Planning
J. Villa & Company Inc. FLOOR PLAN
JVillaCompany.com REV 5-31-2022
29433 Cole Grade Road, Valley Center, Ca 92082 760-688-7430 JVillaCompany.com PODS BUILDING ROOF PLAN 1/16" = 1'-0" C
CH
ASAR
I TE
R
T
SE
Y
L
O
I CEN
A. D
A
R O
A
L I F
I N A
E
O
F C
S
T ATREN. 9-23 NO. C20350
R
O

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240 ROOF ACCESS HATCH 01 N.T.S TESTED ABS ROOF DRAIN w/ 2" RAISED SCUPPER OVERFLOW Item Number: 9.

Page 257 of 1104 ends

LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
10' - 0"
12' - 0"
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
35' - 0"
Building Design, Planning & Construction
J.Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road. Valley Center, Calif. 92082 760-688-7430 A201

EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
Revision Schedule
Description Date
1/8" = 1'-0"
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
2 EAST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
3 NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"
4 WEST ELEVATION

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
REV
4-15-2022
Item Number: 9.

Page 258 of 1104 ends

Building Design, Planning & Construction
J.Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road. Valley Center, Calif. 92082 760-688-7430 A202

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240

EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVES

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
REV
4-21-2022
Revision Schedule
Description Date
1 3D View 12 3D View 23 3D View 3
Item Number: 9.

Page 259 of 1104 ends

LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
Authorized
Personnel
Only
Authorized
Personnel
Only
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
Building Design, Planning & Construction
J.Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road. Valley Center, Calif. 92082 760-688-7430 A203

COLORED ELEVATIONS

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
REV
6-16-2022
Revision Schedule
Description Date
1/8" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH COLORED ELEVATION1/8" = 1'-0"
2 WEST COLORED ELEVATION
PODS
Moving & Storage
PODS
OFFICE
KEYNOTES0102
"PODS MOVING & STORAGE" SIGN SEE SIGN 'A' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION

SIGN 'A'

SIGN 'C'SIGN 'B'
01 "PODS OFFICE" SIGN SEE SIGN 'B' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION 03 "AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY" SIGN SEE SIGN 'C' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION WAYNE DALTON STEEL ROLL-UP MODEL # 926IN RAL POWDER COAT "GREY"LITHONIA LIGHTING TWP SINGLE LIGHT 15-1/2" TALL INTEGRATED LED COMMERCIAL WALL PACK 0405
02 03 03
TIMELY S SERIES 20 GAUGE EXTERIOR STANDARD FRAME & DOOR FINISH IN COLOR "SC106" 06 04 04
05 05 05 05
05 05
05 05
07 3/4" DEEP x 1" WIDE REVEAL DEPRESSIONS IN CONCRETE - TYP. 06 06 06
06 07 07
07 07 07
20' x 16' CASCADIA UNIVERSAL SERIES™ STOREFRONT GLAZING FRAME COLOR -RAINWARE WHITE & GLAZING COLOR - FORD BLUE 080910
08 CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PAINTED COLOR - POLAR BEAR -75 BY BEHR CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PAINTED COLOR - SHARK FIN -PPU24-19 BY BEHR12' x 16' CASCADIA UNIVERSAL SERIES™ STOREFRONT GLAZING FRAME COLOR - RAINWARE WHITE & GLAZING COLOR - FORD BLUE 11 09
10 10 10
10 10 10
10 11 11
11 11
11 11 11
11 11 11
Item Number: 9.

Page 260 of 1104 ends

LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
LEVEL 1 FLOOR
PLAN
0' - 0"
ROOF
33' - 6"
Building Design, Planning & Construction
J.Villa & Company Inc.
29433 Cole Grade Road. Valley Center, Calif. 92082 760-688-7430 A204

COLORED ELEVATIONS

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]
REV
6-16-2022
Revision Schedule
Description Date
1/8" = 1'-0" 1 EAST COLORED ELEVATION1/8" = 1'-0"
2 SOUTH COLORED ELEVATION
KEYNOTES0102
"PODS MOVING & STORAGE" SIGN SEE SIGN 'A' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION "PODS OFFICE" SIGN SEE SIGN 'B' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION 03 "AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY" SIGN SEE SIGN 'C' ON SHEET A203 FOR SIZE, COLOR & SIGN INFOMATION WAYNE DALTON STEEL ROLL-UP MODEL # 926IN RAL POWDER COAT "GREY"LITHONIA LIGHTING TWP SINGLE LIGHT 15-1/2" TALL INTEGRATED LED COMMERCIAL WALL PACK 0405
TIMELY S SERIES 20 GAUGE EXTERIOR STANDARD FRAME & DOOR FINISH IN COLOR "SC106" 0607 3/4" DEEP x 1" WIDE REVEAL DEPRESSIONS IN CONCRETE - TYP. 20' x 16' CASCADIA UNIVERSAL SERIES™ STOREFRONT GLAZING FRAME COLOR -RAINWARE WHITE & GLAZING COLOR - FORD BLUE 080910 CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PAINTED COLOR - POLAR BEAR - 75 BY BEHR CONCRETE TILT-UP WALL PAINTED COLOR - SHARK FIN -PPU24-19 BY BEHR12' x 16' CASCADIA UNIVERSAL SERIES™ STOREFRONT GLAZING FRAME COLOR - RAINWARE WHITE & GLAZING COLOR - FORD BLUE 11 10 10 10
10 10 10 10
11 11
11 11
11 11
07 07 07
07 07 07
05 05 05
05 05
06 06 06
06 06
Item Number: 9.

Page 261 of 1104 ends

BUILDING SECTION "A"SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
28'-0"
33'-9"
TOP OF CONCRETE WALL PANELS 8'-0"
28'-0"
33'-9" BUILDING SECTION REVISED "B" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
33'-9"
6" 21" WF TALL ROOF PURLINS TOP OF CONCRETE WALL PANELS TPO ROOFING o/ 2" EPS 3/8" / FT. ROOF SLOPE TOP OF CONCRETE WALL PANELS BUILDING SECTION "C"SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 21" WF TALL ROOF PURLINS TOP OF CONCRETE WALL PANELS TPO ROOFING o/ 2" EPS 3/8" / FT. ROOF SLOPE 28'-0"
33'-9"
TOP OF CONCRETE WALL PANELS A301
VBuilding Design & Planning
Villa & Company
Jeffery N. Villa 135 W. Mission Ave. Suite 200, Escondido, Calif. 92025 760-519-6920 JVillaCompany.com SECTIONS JVillaCompany.com
C
CH
ASAR
I TE
R
T
SE
Y
L
O
I CEN
A. D
A
R O
A
L I F
I N A
E
O
F C
S
T ATREN. 9-23 NO. C20350
R
O REV. 06-02-2022

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC

DAVID SNIDER
730 ARCADY ROAD
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
(216) 785-0011
[email protected]

PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA 92240
Item Number: 9.

Page 262 of 1104 ends

IIQEE

PODS OFFICE
inZ0
Moving & storage
2 OFFICE
__|_
.5: E HHII .1
Item Number: 9.

Page 263 of 1104 ends

760
760
765 765
765
765
765
765
765
765
765
765
765
765
770
770
770
770
770
763.6
762.8
763.1
765.3
763.4
765.2
763.2
765.7
764.5
768.3
769.3
769.8
769.1
769.5
770.8
769.3
770.5
770.4
769.1
765.2
766.9
764.5
769.3
769.4
769.1 767.3
766.7
766.7
763.6
764.6
762.3
762.2
764.1
763.6
764.6
763.5
762.9
765.3
765.6
765.2
762.9
763.5
760.8
765.5
766.6
768.5
770.5
769.3
770.3
764.6
762.4
761.5
763.6
764.4
763.9
767.8
766.7
766.9
758.7
758.4
759.9
760.7 760.4
757.3
759.5
761.9
761.2
762.8
759.3 759.4 759.2
759.6
760.8
761.4
762.5
763.9
Asph.

Conc.

Rocks
Rocks
769.00
768.00
767.00
766.00
765.00
764.00
763.00
762.00
761.00
769.0
TC
769.0
TC
769.0
NG
769.0
NG
768.0
NG
768.3
NG
766.0
NG
766.0
NG
765.0
NG
763.0
NG
4%

3.6%
1% 1%
1%
763.0
NG
759.0
NG
760.0
NG
759.0
NG
760.0
NG
762.0
NG
758.4
TC
758.8
TC
759.1
TC
758.7
TC
760.7
TC
760.0
TC
759.5
TC
759.0
TC
767.8
TC
768.9
TC
768.0
TC
762.7
TC/GB
762.5
TC
2%
762.8
TC
761.8
TC
763.9
TC
763.5
TC
762.4
TC
761.5
FL
763.9
TC
763.8
TC
763.8
TC

0.5%
4%
763.8
TC
763.5
TC
763.5
TC
763.6
TC
762.2
TC
762.3
TC
762.4
TC
762.6
TC
762.9
TC
763.0
TC
762.0
TC
768.3
TC
766.7
TC
766.3
TC
763.20
FL/GB
4%
766.5
TC
766.9
TC

0.5%
764.0
TC
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
766.2
TC
766.5
TC
766.4
TC
764.2
TC 764.0
TC
1%
768.5
TC
4%
767.0
TC
765.0
TC
765.2
TC
764.8
TC
765.0
TC
767.2
TC
762.6
TC
762.8
TC
763.2
TC
763.4
TC
762.8
TC
762.6
TC
762.8
TC
762.1
TC
762.3
TC
767.65
TC
768.0
TC
767.7
TC
761.9
TC/GB
761.0
TC
760.6
TC
760.2
TC
759.8
TC
759.4
TC

0.5%
762.7
TC
768.9
TC
768.0
TC
767.8
TC
768.0
TC
768.0
TC
768.0
TC
767.8
TC
762.5
TC
762.6
TC
762.8
TC
762.9
TC
763.2
TC
763.1
TC
761.8
FL/GB
766.5
FL
763.0
TC

0.5%

3.6% 0.5% 1.0%
761.4
FL
Ridge
Ridge
767.4
TC
767.2
TC
768.5
TC

POD WAREHOUSE
FF = 764.5
PE = 764.0
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING NO PARKING
Ridge
Ridge
768.8
TC
762.9
TC
762.5
TC
764.9
TC
766.35
TC
763.85
TC
766.50
TC
768.40
TC
762.95
TC
767.65
TC
762.35
TC

1.0% 3.7%
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
764.5
FS
0'
80'
SCALE 1"=40'
40' 120' 160'
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com Copyright 2022
All Rights Reserved cMSA Consulting, Inc.

EAST
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST

CENTERLINE

EASEMENT

EXISTING
(E)
(N)
(S)
(W)
C/L
ESMT.

EX.

ABBREVIATIONS

AC ACREAGE

C&G CURB AND GUTTER

APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER

E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT
A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE
MAX. MAXIMUM

BNDRY BOUNDARY
M.B. MAP BOOK

EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE

EXISTING SEWER

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED EASEMENT

EXISTING PROJECT BOUNDARY

EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN

EXISTING WATER

PROPOSED LOT LINE

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE

PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY

EXISTING IRRIGATION

EXISTING GAS

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING ELECTRIC

EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE

EXISTING CABLE

EXISTING CONTOURS

EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS
LEGEND

EXISTING LOT LINE

EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EXISTING TELEPHONE MIN. MINIMUM
NUMBER

PROPOSED

RIGHT OF WAY

TYPICAL
NO.

PROP.

R/W
TYP.

P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

SF SQUARE FEET

R RADIUS
STD. STANDARD

P/L PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE

R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)

UG UNDERGROUND

O/H OVERHEAD

OS/PP OPEN SPACE / PARKS
PG. PAGE

PRELIMINARY GRADING

DATA TABLE
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 666-360-017
EXHIBIT DATE: JUNE 16, 2022
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:

ADDRESS:

INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY: APRIL 25, 2022
EXHIBIT PREPARER:

ADDRESS:

MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270
CONTACT: PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE: (760) 320-9811

REVISIONS
NO. DATE

IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 4 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.

TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252

APPLICANT /
ADDRESS:

CONTACT:
730 ARCADY ROAD
MONTECITO, CALIFORNIA 93108

DAVID SNIDER

SNIDER INTERESTS, LLC
LAND OWNER:

PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE
%%UESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES

RAW QUANTITIES
SUBSIDENCE 409 373
RAW ADJUSTED 3,911 6,501
SHRINKAGE 722
IMPORT
TOTAL EARTHWORK %%O20,371 %%O20,371
SUBTOTAL 15,907 20,371
OVER-EX (PADS) 6,382 6,382
OVER-EX (PADS) SHRINKAGE 709
4,320 6,128

CUT (CY) FILL (CY)
2,833
{EARTHWORK NOTE: ASSUMED EARTHWORK ANALYSIS FACTORS:
}
{THE FOLLOWING FACTORS WERE USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE EARTHWORK ANALYSIS:

SHRINKAGE:10%
SUBSIDENCE:0.1'
OVEREXCAVATION3'
DISTURBED AREA5 ACRES
EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY WAS PROVIDED BY INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC., DATED APRIL 25. 2022} {EATHWORK NOTE:
}
{THE IMPORT SHOWN (2833 C.Y.) ON THE PLAN, WILL ADJUST
GRADING ELEVATIONS, AND LOWER ALL ELEVATIONS 0.4 FEET
TO BALANCE EARTHWORK.}
OVER-EX (STREETS) 3,982 3,982
OVER-EX (STREETS) SHRINKAGE 442
UNDERGROUND RET & FOOTINGS 1631 1631
&

DRAINAGE PLAN
Item Number: 9.

Page 264 of 1104 ends

Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration
Application for

4.85-Acre Logistics Center
Prepared for:

City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, California 92240
Prepared by:

MSA Consulting, Inc.
34200 Bob Hope Drive
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Desert Hot Springs Planning Department
Patricia Villagomez
Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, California 92240
760-329-6411

Item Number: 9.

Page 265 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 2
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page No.

Chapter 1 - Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Authority ........................................................................ 3

1.2 Determination ..................................................................................... 3

1.3 Authority to Prepare a Negative Declaration ...................................... 3

1.4 Public Review Process ....................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 – Project Summary

2.1 Project Vicinity .................................................................................... 5

2.2 Project Description ............................................................................. 8

2.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program .......................................................... 11 Chapter 3 – Environmental Checklist Form .................................................... 14 Chapter 4 – Discussion of Environmental Topics .......................................... 16 Item Number: 9.

Page 266 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 3
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose and Authority
The City of Desert Hot Springs (City) is the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and is responsible for carrying out, authorizing, or approving actions that have the potential to adversely affect the environment. The project will require certain discretionary approvals by the City and other governmental agencies. Therefore, the project is subject to environmental review requirements under CEQA.

CEQA requires that the public agency analyze and acknowledge the environmental consequences of their discretionary actions and consider alternatives and mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce significant adverse impacts resulting from the project.

The entire project property occupies approximately 4.85 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of 19th Avenue and Calle De Los Romos in the City of Desert Hot Springs. The project proposes the development of one approximately 60,000 square-foot building to support a climatecontrolled container storage facility and supporting infrastructure improvements.

The site has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial (I). The project also occurs within the City’s Industrial Cannabis Overlay. The site is zoned as Light Industrial (I-L) with an Industrial Cannabis Overlay.

This Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project proponent will submit a Technical Site Plan, Architectural plans, and Development Permit as a part of the application and entitlement process. Each of the submitted documents will be reviewed by the City of Desert Hot Springs.

Site design features will be reviewed and approved by the City relative to compliance with the City’s General Plan and Zoning. The City of Desert Hot Springs will serve as the lead agency pursuant to CEQA.

1.2 Determination
This Initial Study determined that development of the proposed storage facility would not have a significant impact on the environment, with the implementation of mitigation measures. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed.

1.3 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Authority to Prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration
This Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (DMND) has been prepared by the City of Desert Hot Springs as lead agency and is in conformance with Section 15070, Subsection (a), of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the CEQA. The purpose of the DMND and the Initial Study Checklist was to determine whether there were potentially significant impacts associated with the development of the Snider Interests, LLC. Logistics Project.

Item Number: 9.

Page 267 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 4
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022

1.4 Public Review Process
In accordance with CEQA, a good faith effort has been made during the preparation of this DMND to contact affected agencies, organizations and persons who may have an interest in this project.

The MND will be sent to the Riverside County Clerk, responsible agencies, and advertised in The Desert Star Weekly.

Item Number: 9.

Page 268 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 5
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 CHAPTER TWO – PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project Vicinity
The project is located on 4.85 acres of vacant land located on the northeast corner of Calle De Los Romos and Avenue 19, in the City of Desert Hot Springs, California.

Total Project Area: 4.85 acres
Assessor’s Parcel Number: 666-360-017
Section, Township & Range Description or reference:

Section 14, Township 3 South, Range 4 East, San Bernardino Base Line & Meridian.

The 4.85-acre project property consists of vacant land and is located on the northeast corner of Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue, in the City of Desert Hot Springs. Calle De Los Romos to the west is a partially paved road and Avenue 19 to the south remains unpaved but stabilized with aggregate material. Previous activities onsite visibly involve grading and equipment mobilization for the movement of inert material, ranging from fine soils to gravel and small boulders.

Topographically, the site drains to the south. The entire site lies within FEMA flood zone X, which include other flood areas with a 0.2 percent chance flood; areas with 1 percent chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1 percent annual chance flood.

The location of the project site is shown below in Exhibits 1 and 2.

Item Number: 9.

Page 269 of 1104 ends

I-10 PALM DR
SH-62

DILLON RD
SH-111

PIERSON BLVD N INDIAN CANYON DR

MOUNTAIN VIEW RD

INDIAN CANYON DR

HACIENDA DR

LITTLE MORONGO RD

VARNER RD

MISSION LAKES BLVD
13TH AVE

SAN RAFAEL DR

GENE AUTRY TRL

HACIENDA AVE
SH-62
I-10

VARNER RD

PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS

DESERT HOT SPRINGS DESERT HOT SPRINGS

CATHEDRAL CITY CATHEDRAL CITY

VICINITY MAP

4.85-ACRE LOGISTICS CENTER
EXHIBIT 1

PROJECT SITE
0 5,000
FT Item Number: 9.

Page 270 of 1104 ends

CALLE DE LOS ROMOS
19TH AVE

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

4.85-ACRE LOGISTICS CENTER
EXHIBIT 2

PROJECT SITE
0 100
FT
APN: 666-360-017
Item Number: 9.

Page 271 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 8
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022

2.2 Project Description
The project site occupies approximately 4.85 acres of vacant land at the northeast corner of Avenue 19 and Calle De Los Romos in the City of Desert Hot Springs. The project proposes the development of approximately 60,000-square-foot building to support a climate-controlled container storage facility and supporting infrastructure improvements.

The project property is surrounded by developed uses to the west, and vacant and undeveloped land to the north, east and south. An Anaerobic Digester Facility is proposed approximately 800 feet to the east. The surrounding properties are also located within the City’s I-L zones, with an Industrial Cannabis Overlay. The Light Industrial Zone and Industrial Cannabis Overlay is intended to provide for any and all industrial uses operating entirely in enclosed buildings, and those requiring limited and screen-able outdoor storage space. The project site is largely segregated from the City’s intense residential uses. Therefore, no future land use conflicts with residential or commercial uses are anticipated. This is consistent with the City’s General Plan land use designation.

The facility is expected to house a company which moves goods in portable storage units.

Such units are delivered by truck to homes and businesses where they are filled with personal or business belongings, are then picked up again by truck for storage in the warehouse before the storage unit is moved to the location requested by the client. The storage units are warehoused for a short or long duration, and per the client’s needs are removed from the warehouse for delivery to a local or national destination. The proposed building is not a refrigerated/cold storage warehouse. The entire warehouse will be used for storage of the portable storage units.

The project site will have three entry points, two on Calle De Los Romos along the western boundary and one on 19th Avenue along the eastern boundary. Calle De Los Romos is currently paved with curb and gutter on the west side but not fully improved adjacent to the property. 19th Avenue is not paved adjacent to the proposed project. Local north-south circulation is provided by Indian Canyon Drive located approximately 0.25 miles west of the project. Regional access to the site is provided by the I-10 Freeway located approximately 0.50 mile south of the project.

Access to the truck circulation and loading area of the project will be gated to only allow authorized personnel. This may be accessed by a controlled keyed entry system such as a Knox box for use of police and fire personnel. Access for minimal public access is found on Calle De Los Romos. The project will improve Calle De Los Romos to its ultimate condition, including paving, gutter, sidewalk, and landscaped parkway. Final Street Improvement Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City.

Proposed circulation and parking for the proposed facility will be consistent with City parking standards. The project is required to provide 60 parking spaces (4,000 sf at 300 Item Number: 9.

Page 272 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 9
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 office and 56,000 sf per 1,200 sf storage). The project proposes 92 parking spaces, including 6 ADA spaces.

In addition to this Initial Study, the project’s entitlements also include a Development Permit (Municipal Code Chapter 17.92). Approval of the Development Permit and this environmental document will render the project in full compliance with City regulations.

The project site plan is shown subsequently in Exhibit 3.

Item Number: 9.

Page 273 of 1104 ends

SITE PLAN

4.85-ACRE LOGISTICS CENTER
NTS Item Number: 9. EXHIBIT 3

Page 274 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 11
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022

2.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program
Table 2-1: Mitigation Monitoring Program outlines the potential impacts and mitigation measures of the project and assigns responsibility for the oversight of each mitigation measure. This Table shall be included in all bid documents and included as part of the project development.

Item Number: 9.

Page 275 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 12
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 Table 2-1
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Section Number Mitigation Measures Responsible for Monitoring Timing Impact after Mitigation IV. Biological Resources
BR-1: The project proponent shall ensure that burrowing owl clearance survey is performed not more than 14 days prior to project site disturbance (clearing, grubbing, grading, and construction), and then again 24-hours prior to site disturbance, as burrowing owls may colonize or recolonize the site within the time between the original survey and project activities. If any owls are identified, the most current protocol established by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Burrowing Owl Mitigation) must be followed.

Developer
Planning Dept
Biologist
Prior to
grading and
other ground
disturbing
activities
Less than
significant
BR-2: Prior to construction and issuance of any grading permit, the City of Desert Hot Springs shall ensure compliance with the CVMSHCP and its associated Implementing Agreement and shall ensure that payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee for the proposed Project is sent to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission.

Developer
Planning Dept
Prior to
building
permits
Less than
significant
V. Cultural Resources
CR-1: The presence of a qualified archaeological monitor or Cultural Resource Monitor shall be required during all project related ground disturbing activities (clearing, grubbing and grading). In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 50-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside the buffered area may continue during this assessment period.

Planning
Department
Qualified
Archaeologist
Native American
Monitor
During
grading and
other ground
disturbing
activities
Less than
significant
Item Number: 9.

Page 276 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 13
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 Section Number Mitigation Measures Responsible for Monitoring Timing Impact after Mitigation VII. Geology and Soils
GEO-1: A qualified paleontologist shall be retained and present during the first days of monitoring. Once the paleontologist has had a chance to assess the sediments and paleontological potential of the project area, he/she may make a recommendation to reduce the monitoring effort, as appropriate, or continue with full time monitoring. This decision shall be communicated along with the rationalization to the City for their records.

Developer
Planning
Department
Qualified
Paleontologist
During
grading and
other ground
disturbing
activities
Less than
significant
XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1: The project shall retain an archaeologist and an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor during ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed project.

Developer
Planning
Department
Qualified
Archaeologist
Agua Caliente
Native American
Cultural
Resource
Monitor
During
grading and
other ground
disturbing
activities
Less than
significant
Item Number: 9.

Page 277 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 14
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 CHAPTER THREE – ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

1. Project Name: 4.85-Acre Logistics Center

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, California 92240

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
760-329-6411

4. Project Location:

See Exhibits 1 and 2

5. Project Applicants’ Name and Address:

Snider Interests, LLC
c/o David Snider
730 Arcady Road
Santa Barbara, CA 93108

6. General Plan Designation: Industrial (I) / Industrial Cannabis Overlay

7. Zoning Designation: I-L Light Industrial / Industrial Cannabis Overlay

8. Description of Project: The project proposes the development of one, 60,000-squarefoot building to support moving and storage distribution center on approximately 4.85 acres of vacant land. Additionally, the project proposes internal paved drive aisles, 92 paved parking spaces, and landscaping throughout. Vehicular access will be provided from Calle De Los Romos and 19th Avenue (egress only).

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is surrounded by vacant land to the north, east, and south, and a commercial property to the west. Calle De Los Romos delineates the project’s western boundary, and Avenue 19 delineates the project’s southern boundary. The commercial property west of the project includes Coachillin Business Park, which is surrounded by block wall fencing around the perimeter. This property includes developed and undeveloped parcels. Properties north, west, east, and south of the project site are located within the Industrial land use designation.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.): The project shall require approval from the Mission Springs Water District, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the City of Desert Hot Springs, and Riverside County Flood Control District).

Item Number: 9.

Page 278 of 1104 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs Page 15
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gases Hazards & Haz.

Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation Tribal Resources Utilities / Service
Systems Wildfire
Mandatory Findings
of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required. _________________________________________
Patricia Villagomez
Principal Planner
_______________
Date
1/30/2023
Item Number: 9.

Page 279 of 1104 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
City of Desert Hot Springs Page 16
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 CHAPTER FOUR – DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOPICS
Issues:

I. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:

Sources: Desert Hot Springs General Plan, 2020; Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code; State Scenic Highway Program, CalTrans; U.S. Geological Survey Map
a) Have a substantial adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
Discussion:

The project encompasses approximately 4.85 acres of vacant land situated east of Calle De Los Romos and north of Avenue 19 in Desert Hot Springs. Currently, the project site is vacant, however, the site has been disturbed from previous construction operations. The site exhibits a predominantly flat condition.

Overall, there are no salient topographic features or other natural visual landmarks on the project site or its general surroundings.

The project site lies within the City of Desert Hot Springs’s Industrial (I) General Plan land use designations with an Industrial Cannabis Overlay. Industrial land uses allow for a broad range of light industrial, light manufacturing, and indoor cultivation uses housed in multi-tenant, low-scale industrial developments. Business and industrial parks are also allowed. Maximum building heights of 2 stories are allowed in I land use designations. The Industrial Cannabis Overlay creates a district that allows for cannabis-related uses within an industrial setting, including cannabis cultivation, manufacturing of cannabis products, and cannabis research and development enterprises.

In the project’s vicinity, developed uses are located to the west of the site, while vacant and undeveloped properties are located north and south of the site. The vacant properties north and south of the project exhibit similar physical characteristics, consisting of relatively flat topography and scattered vegetation coverage. The area east of the project site is vacant, however, human disturbance is evident on this property, since the site has been graded and possibly used for construction storage. Calle De Los Romos delineates the project’s western boundary, while 19th Avenue delineates the project’s southern boundary.

The property west of the project (separated by Calle De Los Romos) includes Coachillin Business Park and Specific Plan area. This area is partially developed with perimeter block walls and landscaping, however, only a portion of the lots within the Specific Plan area are developed at the time of the drafting of this DMND.

The City of Desert Hot Springs has varying distinguished views of surrounding topographic features and mountain ranges. The perception and uniqueness of scenic vistas and visual character can vary according to location and composition of its surrounding context. The subjective value of views is generally affected by the presence and intensity of neighboring man–made improvements, such as structures, overhead utilities, and landscape, often in relation to the aesthetic quality offered by a natural background, such as open space, mountain ranges, or a landmark feature. The proximity and massing of structures, vegetation, overhead utilities and other visual barriers interact with the visibility of surrounding environments to restrict or enhance local characteristic views. The assessment of scenic value also considers the compatibility of proposed projects in relation to areas, land uses or vantage points where the enjoyment of scenic vistas may exist, such as scenic roads or residential areas. For Item Number: 9.

Page 280 of 1104 ends

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
City of Desert Hot Springs Page 17
Draft Initial Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration December 2022 example, an industrial facility proposed within an existing industrial land use district and distant from any scenic roadways or residential uses would be expected to result in less impacts compared to a similar facility located near residential uses or adjacent to scenic roads, where the view shed opportunities would potentially be hindered. Existing commercial and industrial developments in the City typically consists of metal buildings with low-pitched roofs, and a mass and scale suitable for the zoning district, parcel size, and operation being supported.

The undeveloped project property has distant and relatively unobstructed views of the San Jacinto and Santa Rosa Mountains to the southwest, south and southeast. Views of the San Gorgonio Mountains to the northwest are distant and partially obstructed by the existing Coachillin Specific Plan property west of the project. The Little San Bernardino Mountains are located to the north and are distant and largely unobstructed. The Indio Hills are located east and southeast of the project and are also unobstructed from view at the project site due to the project’s separation from existing developed properties.

The project proposes the development of a 60,000-square-foot logistics building, with associated improvements, 92 parking spaces, and landscaping. Development of the project site will not obstruct views of San Gorgonio or Little San Bernardino Mountains, located northwest, north, and northeast of the site, since existing buildings are not located south of the project site. Additionally, views of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains, located southwest, south and southeast of the project would not be obstructed by the proposed project because buildings or structures do not currently exist north of the project site.

Motorists travelling along Calle De Los Romos and Avenue 19 have unobstructed views of the Little San Bernardino Mountains to the north and northeast when viewed adjacent to the project’s boundaries.

Development of the proposed project may result in a brief obstruction to the Little San Bernardino Mountains since the project proposes a one-story facility on a property that is currently vacant and undeveloped. However, the obstruction will be brief since travelers along Calle De Los Romos do not typically stop to view the surrounding scenic vistas. 19th Avenue, along the project’s frontage is not paved.

Vehicular use is limited along this segment of the road. The proposed project building will be setback and developed consistent with the City of Desert Hot Springs standards.

The project site is located within the City’s Light Industrial (I-L) zones. According to Chapter 17, Zoning, of the Desert Hot Springs Municipal Code, the maximum building height for structures within I-L zones are also 50 feet, however, the front setback for I-L designations is 20 feet. Consistent with the standards established in Chapter 17 of the City’s Municipal Code, the proposed project building is proposed to be approximately 34 feet in height. Building setbacks will also comply with the City’s guidelines.

Consistent with the architectural design guidelines established in Chapter 17 of the City’s Municipal Code, the overall architectural character will be that of well-maintained industrial facility. The building materials proposed for the project includes exposed concrete masonry painted white and grey, steel doors in grey, industrial roll-up garage doors, and windows. All architectural plans will require review by the City prior to construction. Proposed downward-oriented lighting mounted on the building walls and on posts will provide the necessary nighttime illumination for facility security in the parking lot and drive aisles.

Moreover, the project’s design avoids the elements identified by the City as being undesirable. In particular, the project will avoid highly reflective surfaces at the ground story; large blank, unarticulated wall surfaces; exposed, untreated precision block walls and chain link fencing. The proposed perimeter landscaping and fence design will be complimentary to the building elements. The project edges and street frontages will be improved with trees as well as low level plantings to visually coordinate with the Item Number: 9.

Page 281 of 1104 ends

Desert Hot Springs City CouncilMay 2, 2023

Desert Hot Springs City Council
May 2, 2023