Agenda — Desert Hot Springs City Council, December 12, 2024 (part 8 of 16)

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.460
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 53 214 71 42 112 23 41 132 21 61 107 31 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 13 54 18 11 28 6 10 33 5 15 27 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 49 198 66 39 104 21 38 122 19 56 99 29 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 192 64 38 101 20 37 118 18 54 96 28 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
12 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-133
Item Number: 1.

Page 1264 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 12.55
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.94 12.22 11.84 12.88
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 60.09 8.88 33.20 33.50 2.59 39.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.40 0.36 1.33 1.34 0.10 1.59 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.46 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.35
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 581 668 566 550 629 562 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
13 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-134
Item Number: 1.

Page 1265 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.449
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 57 174 47 58 87 11 19 214 27 31 203 87 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 44 12 15 22 3 5 54 7 8 51 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 54 164 44 55 82 10 18 202 25 29 191 82 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 52 159 43 53 80 10 17 196 24 28 185 80 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
14 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-135
Item Number: 1.

Page 1266 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 12.73
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.48 11.41 13.16 12.38
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 58.03 26.84 51.15 3.34 50.85 11.70 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.32 1.07 2.05 0.13 2.03 0.47 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.45 0.27 0.42 0.04 0.42 0.14
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 619 583 558 632 563 641 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
15 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-136
Item Number: 1.

Page 1267 of 2517 ends

OPENING YEAR (2025) WITH PROJECT

PHASE I
APX-137
Item Number: 1.

Page 1268 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\AMOYp_I.pdf 2/16/2023
Vistro File: G:\...\AM_PHI.vistro Scenario 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

EB Left 0.150 17.0 C
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject South Dwy (EW) 7 SB Thru 0.004 0.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject North Dwy (EW) 6 SB Left 0.091 13.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Project Dwy (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 5 WB Thru 0.528 14.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 SB Left 0.470 13.3 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.265 18.6 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.162 7.1 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-138
Item Number: 1.

Page 1269 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.162
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 7.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
2 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-139
Item Number: 1.

Page 1270 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 59 2 2 185 145 19
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 15 1 1 46 36 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 53 2 2 165 129 17
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 0 0 16 15 4
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 2 2 145 111 13
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
3 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-140
Item Number: 1.

Page 1271 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 25 0 12 40 28 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 65
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
4 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-141
Item Number: 1.

Page 1272 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 44.33 1.32 2.81 3.07 6.47 0.84 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.77 0.05 0.11 0.12 0.26 0.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 24.63 0.73 1.56 1.71 3.59 0.47 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.99 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.02 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS D C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 36.70 29.34 47.36 1.28 2.21 1.95 X, volume / capacity 0.62 0.02 0.25 0.12 0.10 0.02
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.50 0.11 15.04 0.16 0.14 0.02 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 30.20 29.23 32.31 1.12 2.07 1.93
c, Capacity [veh/h] 95 85 8 1541 1417 1205
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.76 0.76
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3 3 0 54 49 49
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 65 65 65 65 65 65
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
5 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-142
Item Number: 1.

Page 1273 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 36.70 29.34 47.36 1.28 2.21 1.95 Movement LOS D C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.45 1.77 2.18
Approach LOS D A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 7.07
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.162
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 24.16 24.16 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.970 2.106 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 645 1106 738 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.92 6.49 12.96
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.868 1.830 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
6 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-143
Item Number: 1.

Page 1274 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.265
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 18.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
7 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-144
Item Number: 1.

Page 1275 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 87 91 53 121 230 72
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 22 23 13 30 58 18
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 77 81 47 108 205 64
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 12 0 4 12 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 67 46 101 187 62
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
8 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-145
Item Number: 1.

Page 1276 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 12 39 26 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 65
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
9 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-146
Item Number: 1.

Page 1277 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.79 16.01 39.54 8.98 151.68 40.29 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.59 0.64 1.58 0.36 6.07 1.61 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 8.22 8.90 21.97 4.99 84.27 22.38 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.33 0.36 0.88 0.20 3.37 0.90 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS A A D A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 5.54 5.66 36.85 3.00 30.79 24.40 X, volume / capacity 0.08 0.10 0.60 0.09 0.79 0.28
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.13 0.20 6.50 0.13 4.67 0.57 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 5.40 5.47 30.34 2.87 26.13 23.83
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1126 957 88 1333 293 261
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.13 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.71 0.16 0.16
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 39 39 3 46 11 11
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 65 65 65 65 65 65
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
10 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-147
Item Number: 1.

Page 1278 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 5.54 5.66 36.85 3.00 30.79 24.40 Movement LOS A A D A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.60 13.31 29.27
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 18.58
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.265
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 24.16
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.167 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 707 1076 676 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 13.60 6.95 14.26
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.853 1.847 1.560 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
11 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-148
Item Number: 1.

Page 1279 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.470
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
12 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-149
Item Number: 1.

Page 1280 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 23 130 47 117 276 41 39 158 90 149 158 59 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 33 12 29 69 10 10 40 23 37 40 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 121 44 109 256 38 36 147 84 138 147 55 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 10 29 0 49 28 0 0 19 9 0 48 20
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 12 0 19 11 0 0 8 4 0 20 8 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 7 78 43 40 211 37 35 116 69 134 77 26 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
13 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-150
Item Number: 1.

Page 1281 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 27 0 0 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 8.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
14 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-151
Item Number: 1.

Page 1282 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 50.91 14.82 63.80 99.56 12.88 50.19 22.04 122.15 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.04 0.59 2.55 3.98 0.52 2.01 0.88 4.89 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 28.29 8.24 35.44 55.31 7.16 27.88 12.24 67.86 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.13 0.33 1.42 2.21 0.29 1.12 0.49 2.71 Critical Lane Group No No No Yes No No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B C B B A A B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 13.47 12.64 25.72 14.72 12.59 8.72 8.09 12.00 X, volume / capacity 0.22 0.08 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.21 0.11 0.46 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.16 0.06 0.95 0.39 0.05 0.50 0.28 1.91 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 13.30 12.58 24.77 14.32 12.53 8.23 7.80 10.09 c, Capacity [veh/h] 685 575 285 677 575 950 802 796
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1701 1589 1207 1870 1589 1740 1589 1410 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.03 0.10 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.06 0.26 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 22 22 22 22 22 30 30 30
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C R C R C
Lane Group Calculations
15 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-152
Item Number: 1.

Page 1283 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.47 13.47 12.64 25.72 14.72 12.59 8.72 8.72 8.09 12.00 12.00 12.00 Movement LOS B B B C B B A A A B B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.27 17.48 8.52 12.00
Approach LOS B B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.27
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.470
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.68 21.68 21.68 21.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.559 2.463 2.351 2.460 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 967 967 767 767 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 8.01 8.01 11.41 11.41
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.890 2.276 2.033 2.164 Bicycle LOS A B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
16 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-153
Item Number: 1.

Page 1284 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.528
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 37 95 48 64 168 47 43 227 81 52 227 57 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 24 12 16 42 12 11 57 20 13 57 14 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 32 82 41 55 144 40 37 195 70 45 195 49 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 0 0 0 0 8 8 15 4 0 16 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 27 80 40 53 140 31 28 175 64 44 174 48 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
17 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-154
Item Number: 1.

Page 1285 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.76
Approach LOS B C B C
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.59 15.15 14.76 15.59
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 35.05 66.65 71.42 11.59 76.34 7.83 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.40 2.67 2.86 0.46 3.05 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.32 0.49 0.51 0.13 0.53 0.09
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 554 572 531 601 529 600 Lanes
Intersection Settings
18 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-155
Item Number: 1.

Page 1286 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.091
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Dwy (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 55.00 55.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 43 74 74 247 139 88
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 11 18 18 62 35 22
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 40 68 68 227 128 81
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 28 49 48 0 0 57
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 12 19 20 0 0 24
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 220 124 0
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
19 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-156
Item Number: 1.

Page 1287 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.87
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.39 1.79 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 15.45 15.45 3.21 3.21 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.62 0.62 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.69 10.06 7.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
20 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-157
Item Number: 1.

Page 1288 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.004
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 0.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project North Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 215 383 0 0 0
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 54 96 0 0 0
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 198 352 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 39 39 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 16 16 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 139 288 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Volumes
21 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-158
Item Number: 1.

Page 1289 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.00
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.58
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS A A A A B B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.74 10.42 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
22 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-159
Item Number: 1.

Page 1290 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.150
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 17.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project South Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 1 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 74 155 323 59 60 116
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 18 39 81 15 15 29
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 68 143 297 54 55 107
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 48 0 0 38 39 77
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 20 0 0 16 16 30
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 139 288 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Volumes
23 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-160
Item Number: 1.

Page 1291 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 4.01
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.63 0.00 14.49
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 3.21 3.21 0.00 0.00 33.92 33.92 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 1.36 1.36 Movement LOS A A A A C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.97 13.20 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.17
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
24 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase I 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-161
Item Number: 1.

Page 1292 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\PMOYp_I.pdf 2/16/2023
Vistro File: G:\...\PM_PHI.vistro Scenario 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

EB Left 0.137 16.2 C
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject South Dwy (EW) 7 NB Thru 0.003 0.0 A
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject North Dwy (EW) 6 SB Left 0.085 13.5 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Project Dwy (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 5 EB Thru 0.486 13.9 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 SB Left 0.423 13.5 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.244 14.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.138 3.3 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
1 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-162
Item Number: 1.

Page 1293 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.138
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 3.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
2 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-163
Item Number: 1.

Page 1294 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 20 1 2 185 173 35
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 0 1 46 43 9
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19 1 2 175 163 33
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 0 0 19 18 5
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 1 2 151 141 27
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
3 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-164
Item Number: 1.

Page 1295 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 23 0 9 37 28 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
4 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-165
Item Number: 1.

Page 1296 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.78 0.68 2.62 3.00 3.35 0.71 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.59 0.03 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 8.21 0.38 1.45 1.67 1.86 0.40 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.33 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.02 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS C C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 34.58 28.73 43.76 1.00 1.94 1.68 X, volume / capacity 0.42 0.02 0.24 0.12 0.12 0.03
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.76 0.22 13.93 0.15 0.17 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 28.82 28.51 29.83 0.85 1.77 1.64
c, Capacity [veh/h] 48 43 8 1571 1438 1222
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.02 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.84 0.77 0.77
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 2 0 51 46 46
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
5 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-166
Item Number: 1.

Page 1297 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.58 28.73 43.76 1.00 1.94 1.68 Movement LOS C C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 34.30 1.46 1.90
Approach LOS C A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.34
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.138
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.72 21.72 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.952 2.116 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 632 1098 799 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.05 6.10 10.83
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.868 1.903 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
6 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-167
Item Number: 1.

Page 1298 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.244
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
7 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-168
Item Number: 1.

Page 1299 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 169 123 64 97 99 110
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 42 31 16 24 25 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 155 113 59 89 91 101
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 14 0 5 14 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 146 96 57 82 75 98
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
8 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-169
Item Number: 1.

Page 1300 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 9 36 24 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
9 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-170
Item Number: 1.

Page 1301 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 20.28 14.99 43.13 1.64 58.04 68.46 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.81 0.60 1.73 0.07 2.32 2.74 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.27 8.33 23.96 0.91 32.24 38.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.45 0.33 0.96 0.04 1.29 1.52 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A C A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 4.57 4.50 34.14 1.89 27.82 30.25 X, volume / capacity 0.14 0.12 0.63 0.07 0.53 0.66
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.25 0.24 6.38 0.09 2.31 4.37 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 4.32 4.26 27.76 1.80 25.51 25.88
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1194 1015 101 1425 187 167
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.76 0.10 0.10
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 38 38 3 46 6 6
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
10 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-171
Item Number: 1.

Page 1302 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 4.57 4.50 34.14 1.89 27.82 30.25 Movement LOS A A C A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 4.54 14.71 29.10
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.77
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.244
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 21.72
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.135 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 766 1065 666 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 11.44 6.56 13.37
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.041 1.825 1.560 Bicycle LOS B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
11 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-172
Item Number: 1.

Page 1303 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.423
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
12 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-173
Item Number: 1.

Page 1304 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 67 256 71 111 156 23 41 160 36 61 177 59 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 17 64 18 28 39 6 10 40 9 15 44 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 62 237 66 103 144 21 38 148 33 56 164 55 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 8 25 0 41 26 0 0 17 9 0 42 16
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 14 0 23 14 0 0 9 5 0 23 10 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 192 64 38 101 20 37 118 18 54 96 28 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
13 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-174
Item Number: 1.

Page 1305 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 27 0 0 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 8.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
14 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-175
Item Number: 1.

Page 1306 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 134.89 25.47 60.92 58.24 7.98 43.00 7.09 68.91 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 5.40 1.02 2.44 2.33 0.32 1.72 0.28 2.76 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 74.94 14.15 33.84 32.36 4.43 23.89 3.94 38.28 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.00 0.57 1.35 1.29 0.18 0.96 0.16 1.53 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B C B B A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 17.71 14.83 25.79 15.56 14.29 7.21 6.28 8.04 X, volume / capacity 0.52 0.14 0.41 0.26 0.05 0.20 0.04 0.30 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.68 0.13 1.02 0.24 0.04 0.43 0.09 0.80 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 17.03 14.70 24.77 15.32 14.25 6.78 6.19 7.24 c, Capacity [veh/h] 620 502 268 591 502 1020 876 980
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1734 1589 1053 1870 1589 1720 1589 1648 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.19 0.04 0.11 0.08 0.01 0.12 0.02 0.18 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.55 0.55 0.55 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 19 19 19 19 19 33 33 33
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C R C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
15 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-176
Item Number: 1.

Page 1307 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.71 17.71 14.83 25.79 15.56 14.29 7.21 7.21 6.28 8.04 8.04 8.04 Movement LOS B B B C B B A A A A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 17.19 19.37 7.07 8.04
Approach LOS B B A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.51
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.423
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 21.68 21.68 21.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.459 2.412 2.425 Crosswalk LOS F B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 967 967 767 767 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 8.01 8.01 11.41 11.41
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.210 2.038 1.951 2.050 Bicycle LOS B B A B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
16 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-177
Item Number: 1.

Page 1308 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.486
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 63 174 47 58 87 20 29 234 32 31 223 87 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 16 44 12 15 22 5 7 58 8 8 56 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 59 164 44 55 82 19 27 220 30 29 210 82 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 0 0 0 0 9 9 18 5 0 19 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 52 159 43 53 80 10 17 196 24 28 185 80 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
17 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-178
Item Number: 1.

Page 1309 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.93
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.57 12.08 14.77 13.55
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 64.86 30.54 65.93 4.13 61.34 12.21 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.59 1.22 2.64 0.17 2.45 0.49 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.48 0.29 0.49 0.05 0.47 0.14
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 592 561 541 612 545 618 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
18 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-179
Item Number: 1.

Page 1310 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.085
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Dwy (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 55.00 55.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 41 70 70 193 188 83
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 10 17 17 48 47 21
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 38 64 64 178 173 76
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 24 41 40 0 0 48
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 14 23 24 0 0 28
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 173 168 0
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
19 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-180
Item Number: 1.

Page 1311 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.83
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.48 2.09 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 14.87 14.87 3.03 3.03 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.59 0.59 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.51 10.29 7.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
20 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-181
Item Number: 1.

Page 1312 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.003
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 0.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project North Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 0 345 258 0 0 0
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 0 86 64 0 0 0
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0 317 237 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 33 33 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 19 19 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 257 180 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
21 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-182
Item Number: 1.

Page 1313 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.00
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.00 0.00 11.20
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS A A A A B A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.79 9.61 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
22 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-183
Item Number: 1.

Page 1314 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.137
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 16.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project South Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 1 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 70 288 201 55 55 111
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 17 72 50 14 14 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 64 265 185 51 51 102
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 40 0 0 32 32 65
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 24 0 0 19 19 37
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 1.0303 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 257 180 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
23 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-184
Item Number: 1.

Page 1315 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.50
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.53 0.00 13.15
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 3.03 3.03 0.00 0.00 27.68 27.68 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.11 1.11 Movement LOS A A A A C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.16 11.66 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
24 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase I with 2 driveways Year 2025
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase I
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-185
Item Number: 1.

Page 1316 of 2517 ends

OPENING YEAR (2027) WITHOUT PROJECT

PHASE II
APX-186
Item Number: 1.

Page 1317 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\AMOY_II.pdf 10/26/2022
Vistro File: G:\...\AM.vistro Scenario 3 Opening Year Without Project Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

WB Thru 0.497 13.9 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 SB Thru 0.578 14.6 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.255 17.5 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.153 6.8 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-187
Item Number: 1.

Page 1318 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.153
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 6.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
2 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-188
Item Number: 1.

Page 1319 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 56 2 2 170 131 16
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 1 1 43 33 4
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 50 2 2 152 117 14
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 2 2 145 111 13
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
3 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-189
Item Number: 1.

Page 1320 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 23 0 9 37 28 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
4 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-190
Item Number: 1.

Page 1321 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 37.90 1.20 2.62 2.83 5.41 0.66 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.52 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.22 0.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 21.06 0.67 1.45 1.57 3.00 0.37 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.84 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.01 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS C C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 33.35 27.07 43.76 1.30 2.29 2.04 X, volume / capacity 0.58 0.02 0.24 0.11 0.09 0.01
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.54 0.11 13.93 0.15 0.14 0.02 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 27.81 26.97 29.83 1.15 2.15 2.02
c, Capacity [veh/h] 96 86 8 1521 1388 1179
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.81 0.74 0.74
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3 3 0 49 45 45
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
5 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-191
Item Number: 1.

Page 1322 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 33.35 27.07 43.76 1.30 2.29 2.04 Movement LOS C C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 33.13 1.80 2.26
Approach LOS C A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 6.80
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.153
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.72 21.72 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.962 2.086 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 632 1098 799 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.05 6.10 10.83
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.843 1.802 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
6 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-192
Item Number: 1.

Page 1323 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.255
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 17.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
7 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-193
Item Number: 1.

Page 1324 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84 79 54 119 221 73
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 21 20 13 30 55 18
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 75 70 48 106 197 65
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 67 46 101 187 62
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
8 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-194
Item Number: 1.

Page 1325 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 9 36 24 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
9 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-195
Item Number: 1.

Page 1326 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 13.10 12.70 36.34 7.28 131.44 37.10 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.52 0.51 1.45 0.29 5.26 1.48 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 7.28 7.05 20.19 4.05 73.02 20.61 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.29 0.28 0.81 0.16 2.92 0.82 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS A A C A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 5.50 5.57 33.74 2.92 28.44 22.77 X, volume / capacity 0.08 0.08 0.59 0.09 0.77 0.28
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.14 0.18 5.83 0.14 4.30 0.60 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 5.36 5.39 27.90 2.79 24.14 22.17
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1098 934 92 1319 288 257
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.59 0.59 0.05 0.71 0.16 0.16
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 35 35 3 42 10 10
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
10 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-196
Item Number: 1.

Page 1327 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 5.50 5.57 33.74 2.92 28.44 22.77 Movement LOS A A C A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.53 12.54 27.03
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 17.49
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.255
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 21.72
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.152 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 766 1065 666 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 11.44 6.56 13.37
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.829 1.845 1.560 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
11 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-197
Item Number: 1.

Page 1328 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.578
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 88 48 45 239 42 40 131 79 152 87 29 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 22 12 11 60 10 10 33 20 38 22 7 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 82 45 42 222 39 37 122 73 141 81 27 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 7 78 43 40 211 37 35 116 69 134 77 26 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
12 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-198
Item Number: 1.

Page 1329 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.56
Approach LOS B C B C
Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.50 17.75 11.51 15.70
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 16.57 6.61 91.45 33.92 10.99 66.73 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.66 0.26 3.66 1.36 0.44 2.67 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.18 0.08 0.58 0.32 0.13 0.49
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 526 591 564 538 614 548 Lanes
Intersection Settings
13 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-199
Item Number: 1.

Page 1330 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.497
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 33 98 49 65 171 38 34 214 78 54 213 58 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 8 24 12 16 43 10 8 54 19 13 53 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 28 84 42 56 147 33 29 184 67 46 183 50 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 27 80 40 53 140 31 28 175 64 44 174 48 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
14 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-200
Item Number: 1.

Page 1331 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.93
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.21 14.52 13.64 14.67
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 33.72 62.43 60.03 10.92 68.62 7.82 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.35 2.50 2.40 0.44 2.74 0.31 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.32 0.47 0.46 0.13 0.50 0.09
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 570 584 539 611 537 612 Lanes
Intersection Settings
15 10/26/2022
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-201
Item Number: 1.

Page 1332 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\PMOY_II.pdf 10/26/2022
Vistro File: G:\...\PM.vistro Scenario 3 Opening Year Without Project Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

EB Thru 0.461 13.0 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 NB Thru 0.471 12.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.245 14.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.123 3.1 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
1 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-202
Item Number: 1.

Page 1333 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.123
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 3.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
2 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-203
Item Number: 1.

Page 1334 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16 1 2 168 157 30
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 0 1 42 39 7
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 15 1 2 159 148 28
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 1 2 151 141 27
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
3 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-204
Item Number: 1.

Page 1335 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 23 0 9 37 28 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
4 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-205
Item Number: 1.

Page 1336 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.22 0.70 2.62 2.68 2.74 0.56 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.49 0.03 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.02 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 6.79 0.39 1.45 1.49 1.52 0.31 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.27 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.01 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS D C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 35.15 29.06 43.76 0.94 1.84 1.61 X, volume / capacity 0.40 0.03 0.24 0.11 0.11 0.02
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.16 0.31 13.93 0.14 0.15 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 28.99 28.75 29.83 0.80 1.69 1.58
c, Capacity [veh/h] 40 36 8 1579 1446 1229
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.08 0.02 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.85 0.77 0.77
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 1 1 0 51 47 47
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
5 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-206
Item Number: 1.

Page 1337 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 35.15 29.06 43.76 0.94 1.84 1.61 Movement LOS D C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 34.79 1.44 1.81
Approach LOS C A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.14
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.123
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.72 21.72 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.947 2.099 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 632 1098 799 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.05 6.10 10.83
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.840 1.868 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
6 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-207
Item Number: 1.

Page 1338 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.245
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
7 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-208
Item Number: 1.

Page 1339 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 167 110 65 94 86 112
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 42 28 16 23 22 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 153 101 60 86 79 103
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 146 96 57 82 75 98
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
8 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-209
Item Number: 1.

Page 1340 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 9 36 24 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
9 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-210
Item Number: 1.

Page 1341 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 20.11 13.34 43.83 1.59 49.44 70.02 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.80 0.53 1.75 0.06 1.98 2.80 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.17 7.41 24.35 0.88 27.47 38.90 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.45 0.30 0.97 0.04 1.10 1.56 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A C A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 4.57 4.45 34.20 1.89 27.05 30.46 X, volume / capacity 0.14 0.11 0.64 0.07 0.46 0.67
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.25 0.22 6.45 0.09 1.74 4.56 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 4.33 4.24 27.75 1.80 25.30 25.91
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1193 1014 102 1424 188 167
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.07 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.76 0.10 0.10
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 38 38 3 46 6 6
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
10 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-211
Item Number: 1.

Page 1342 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 4.57 4.45 34.20 1.89 27.05 30.46 Movement LOS A A C A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 4.53 15.10 28.98
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.81
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.245
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 21.72
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.123 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 766 1065 666 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 11.44 6.56 13.37
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.017 1.822 1.560 Bicycle LOS B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
11 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-212
Item Number: 1.

Page 1343 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.471
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 12.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 54 218 72 43 115 23 42 134 21 62 109 31 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 55 18 11 29 6 11 34 5 15 27 8 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 50 202 67 40 106 21 39 124 19 57 101 29 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 192 64 38 101 20 37 118 18 54 96 28 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
12 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-213
Item Number: 1.

Page 1344 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 12.77
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.20 12.42 12.02 13.09
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 62.70 9.09 34.63 34.70 2.61 41.11 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.51 0.36 1.39 1.39 0.10 1.64 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.47 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.36
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 578 663 562 546 624 558 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
13 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-214
Item Number: 1.

Page 1345 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.461
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 58 177 48 59 89 12 19 219 27 31 206 89 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 15 44 12 15 22 3 5 55 7 8 51 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 55 167 45 56 84 11 18 206 25 29 194 84 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 52 159 43 53 80 10 17 196 24 28 185 80 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
14 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-215
Item Number: 1.

Page 1346 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 12.99
Approach LOS B B B B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.80 11.59 13.48 12.59
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 60.69 28.09 53.64 3.37 52.61 12.14 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.43 1.12 2.15 0.13 2.10 0.49 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.46 0.28 0.43 0.04 0.42 0.14
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 613 579 554 627 558 635 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
15 10/26/2022
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 3: 3 Opening Year Without Project
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-216
Item Number: 1.

Page 1347 of 2517 ends

OPENING YEAR (2027) WITH PROJECT

PHASE II
APX-217
Item Number: 1.

Page 1348 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\AMOYp_II.pdf 2/16/2023
Vistro File: G:\...\AM_PH2.vistro Scenario 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

EB Left 0.045 17.3 C
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject South Dwy (EW) 7 EB Left 0.109 15.1 C
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject North Dwy (EW) 6 SB Left 0.064 13.6 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Project Dwy (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 5 WB Thru 0.553 15.4 C
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 SB Left 0.490 13.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.271 18.7 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.167 7.1 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-218
Item Number: 1.

Page 1349 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.167
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 7.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
2 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-219
Item Number: 1.

Page 1350 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 61 2 2 191 151 20
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 15 1 1 48 38 5
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 0.8917 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 54 2 2 170 135 18
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 0 0 18 18 4
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 2 2 145 111 13
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
3 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-220
Item Number: 1.

Page 1351 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 25 0 10 40 30 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 65
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
4 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-221
Item Number: 1.

Page 1352 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 45.90 1.32 2.81 3.19 6.89 0.90 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.84 0.05 0.11 0.13 0.28 0.04 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 25.50 0.73 1.56 1.77 3.83 0.50 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.02 0.03 0.06 0.07 0.15 0.02 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS D C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 36.84 29.28 47.36 1.30 2.24 1.97 X, volume / capacity 0.63 0.02 0.25 0.12 0.11 0.02
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 6.67 0.11 15.04 0.17 0.15 0.03 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 30.17 29.18 32.31 1.14 2.09 1.95
c, Capacity [veh/h] 96 86 8 1539 1416 1203
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.08 0.01 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.82 0.76 0.76
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 3 3 0 54 49 49
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 65 65 65 65 65 65
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
5 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-222
Item Number: 1.

Page 1353 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 36.84 29.28 47.36 1.30 2.24 1.97 Movement LOS D C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 36.60 1.78 2.21
Approach LOS D A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 7.09
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.167
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 24.16 24.16 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.971 2.113 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 645 1106 799 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.92 6.49 11.73
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.878 1.842 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
6 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-223
Item Number: 1.

Page 1354 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.271
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 18.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
7 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-224
Item Number: 1.

Page 1355 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 89 93 54 124 236 73
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 22 23 13 31 59 18
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 0.8900 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 79 83 48 110 210 65
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 13 0 4 13 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 71 67 46 101 187 62
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
8 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-225
Item Number: 1.

Page 1356 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 16 39 22 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 65
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
9 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-226
Item Number: 1.

Page 1357 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 15.35 16.61 40.29 9.45 156.33 40.73 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.61 0.66 1.61 0.38 6.25 1.63 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 8.53 9.23 22.38 5.25 86.85 22.63 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.34 0.37 0.90 0.21 3.47 0.91 Critical Lane Group No Yes Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOS A A D A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 5.62 5.75 36.89 3.05 30.99 24.29 X, volume / capacity 0.08 0.10 0.61 0.09 0.80 0.28
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.14 0.20 6.56 0.14 4.89 0.56 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 5.48 5.54 30.33 2.92 26.10 23.73
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1121 953 89 1329 296 264
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.13 0.05 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.60 0.60 0.05 0.71 0.17 0.17
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 39 39 3 46 11 11
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 65 65 65 65 65 65
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
10 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-227
Item Number: 1.

Page 1358 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 5.62 5.75 36.89 3.05 30.99 24.29 Movement LOS A A D A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.69 13.32 29.41
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 18.67
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.271
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 24.16
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.172 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 707 1076 553 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 13.60 6.95 17.03
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.860 1.853 1.560 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
11 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-228
Item Number: 1.

Page 1359 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.490
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
12 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-229
Item Number: 1.

Page 1360 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 24 136 48 138 284 42 40 148 94 152 103 123 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 34 12 34 71 10 10 37 23 38 26 31 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 0.9287 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 22 126 45 128 264 39 37 137 87 141 96 114 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 10 30 0 59 28 0 0 10 9 0 10 60
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 14 0 27 14 0 0 5 5 0 5 27 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 7 78 43 40 211 37 35 116 69 134 77 26 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
13 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-230
Item Number: 1.

Page 1361 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 27 0 0 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 8.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
14 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-231
Item Number: 1.

Page 1362 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 50.93 14.43 74.65 98.03 12.58 50.83 24.62 137.47 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.04 0.58 2.99 3.92 0.50 2.03 0.98 5.50 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 28.30 8.02 41.47 54.46 6.99 28.24 13.68 76.37 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.13 0.32 1.66 2.18 0.28 1.13 0.55 3.05 Critical Lane Group No No No Yes No No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B C B B A A B
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 12.73 11.91 25.29 13.92 11.86 9.33 8.76 13.40 X, volume / capacity 0.22 0.08 0.45 0.40 0.07 0.21 0.12 0.50 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.16 0.06 1.05 0.36 0.05 0.51 0.32 2.34 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 12.58 11.85 24.24 13.55 11.81 8.82 8.43 11.06 c, Capacity [veh/h] 718 606 305 712 606 912 772 758
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1704 1589 1200 1870 1589 1727 1589 1387 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.03 0.12 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.06 0.27 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 0.49 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 23 23 23 23 23 29 29 29
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C R C R C
Lane Group Calculations
15 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-232
Item Number: 1.

Page 1363 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 12.73 12.73 11.91 25.29 13.92 11.86 9.33 9.33 8.76 13.40 13.40 13.40 Movement LOS B B B C B B A A A B B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.54 17.11 9.14 13.40
Approach LOS B B A B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.66
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.490
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.68 21.68 21.68 21.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.577 2.510 2.329 2.503 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 967 967 767 767 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 8.01 8.01 11.41 11.41
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.903 2.325 2.025 2.183 Bicycle LOS A B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
16 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-233
Item Number: 1.

Page 1364 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.553
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 15.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 37 98 49 65 171 49 44 235 83 54 234 58 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 9 24 12 16 43 12 11 59 21 13 58 15 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 0.8593 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 32 84 42 56 147 42 38 202 71 46 201 50 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 4 0 0 0 0 9 9 18 4 0 18 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 27 80 40 53 140 31 28 175 64 44 174 48 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
17 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-234
Item Number: 1.

Page 1365 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 15.43
Approach LOS B C C C
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.97 15.80 15.47 16.41
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 37.13 71.22 77.74 12.14 83.15 8.13 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 1.49 2.85 3.11 0.49 3.33 0.33 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.34 0.51 0.53 0.14 0.55 0.10
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 544 563 524 592 521 591 Lanes
Intersection Settings
18 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-235
Item Number: 1.

Page 1366 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.064
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Dwy (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 55.00 55.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 30 77 78 251 141 32
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 8 19 20 63 35 8
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 28 71 72 231 130 29
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 19 49 50 0 0 20
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 9 22 22 0 0 9
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 220 124 0
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
19 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-236
Item Number: 1.

Page 1367 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.90
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.91 1.81 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 13.08 13.08 3.40 3.40 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.52 0.52 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B A A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.62 9.85 7.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
20 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-237
Item Number: 1.

Page 1368 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.109
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 15.1
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project North Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 48 174 345 47 46 47
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 43 86 12 11 12
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 44 160 317 43 42 43
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 30 10 10 30 29 29
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 14 4 4 13 13 14
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 139 288 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Volumes
21 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-238
Item Number: 1.

Page 1369 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.32
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.76 0.00 13.42
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.05 2.05 0.00 0.00 16.14 16.14 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 Movement LOS A A A A C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.06 11.82 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.07
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
22 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-239
Item Number: 1.

Page 1370 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.045
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 17.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project South Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 1 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 95 207 376 15 15 92
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 52 94 4 4 23
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 87 190 346 14 14 85
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 60 30 29 10 10 58
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 27 14 14 4 4 27
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 139 288 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Volumes
23 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-240
Item Number: 1.

Page 1371 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.66
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.58 0.00 12.58
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 4.18 4.18 0.00 0.00 16.72 16.72 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 Movement LOS A A A A C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.29 11.81 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.14
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
24 2/16/2023
AM Peak Hour
Phase II 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-241
Item Number: 1.

Page 1372 of 2517 ends

Intersection Analysis Summary
Report File: G:\...\PMOYp_II.pdf 2/16/2023
Vistro File: G:\...\PM_PH2.vistro Scenario 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection.

EB Left 0.041 16.5 C
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject South Dwy (EW) 7 EB Left 0.099 14.6 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atProject North Dwy (EW) 6 SB Left 0.061 13.4 B
HCM 7th
Edition Two-way stop Project Dwy (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 5 EB Thru 0.503 14.3 B
HCM 7th
Edition All-way stop Little Morongo Rd (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 4 SB Left 0.438 13.4 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atPierson Blvd (EW) 3 SB Left 0.249 14.8 B
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Indian Canyon Dr (NS) atMission Lakes Blvd (EW) 2 EB Left 0.142 3.4 A
HCM 7th
Edition Signalized Karen Ave (NS) at PiersonBlvd (EW) 1 ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
1 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-242
Item Number: 1.

Page 1373 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.142
Level Of Service: A
Delay (sec / veh): 3.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Karen Ave (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 210.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
2 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-243
Item Number: 1.

Page 1374 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 21 1 2 190 177 35
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 0 1 47 44 9
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 0.9438 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 20 1 2 179 167 33
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 0 0 20 19 5
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 1 2 151 141 27
Name Karen Ave Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
3 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-244
Item Number: 1.

Page 1375 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 14 0 0 10 17 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 23 0 9 37 28 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 0 5 10 10 0
Lead / Lag Lead - Lead - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 7 0 5 2 6 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
4 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-245
Item Number: 1.

Page 1376 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 15.42 0.67 2.62 3.10 3.59 0.74 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.62 0.03 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.03 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 8.57 0.37 1.45 1.72 1.99 0.41 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.34 0.01 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.02 Critical Lane Group Yes No No Yes No No
Lane Group LOS C C D A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 34.46 28.66 43.76 1.02 1.96 1.70 X, volume / capacity 0.42 0.02 0.24 0.12 0.12 0.03
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.69 0.20 13.93 0.16 0.18 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 28.77 28.45 29.83 0.86 1.79 1.65
c, Capacity [veh/h] 49 44 8 1569 1436 1221
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1589 1781 1870 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.02 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.84 0.77 0.77
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 2 0 50 46 46
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group L R L C C R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
5 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-246
Item Number: 1.

Page 1377 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 34.46 28.66 43.76 1.02 1.96 1.70 Movement LOS C C D A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 34.20 1.47 1.92
Approach LOS C A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 3.38
Intersection LOS A
Intersection V/C 0.142
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 9.0 9.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 21.72 21.72 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.953 2.121 0.000 Crosswalk LOS A B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 632 1098 799 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.05 6.10 10.83
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.560 1.876 1.909 Bicycle LOS A A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
6 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-247
Item Number: 1.

Page 1378 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.249
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Mission Lakes Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 260.00 105.00 100.00 160.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 1 1 0 1 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
7 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-248
Item Number: 1.

Page 1379 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 172 125 65 99 102 112
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 43 31 16 25 26 28
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 0.9172 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 158 115 60 91 94 103
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 14 0 5 15 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 146 96 57 82 75 98
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Mission Lakes Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
8 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-249
Item Number: 1.

Page 1380 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 18 0 0 10 10 0
Walk [s] 5 0 0 5 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 27 0 9 36 24 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 10 0 5 10 5 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
9 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-250
Item Number: 1.

Page 1381 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 20.98 15.48 43.83 1.68 59.77 69.56 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.84 0.62 1.75 0.07 2.39 2.78 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 11.66 8.60 24.35 0.94 33.21 38.64 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.47 0.34 0.97 0.04 1.33 1.55 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOS A A C A C C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 4.63 4.56 34.20 1.92 27.81 30.17 X, volume / capacity 0.14 0.12 0.64 0.07 0.54 0.66
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.26 0.25 6.45 0.09 2.35 4.34 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 4.37 4.31 27.75 1.82 25.47 25.83
c, Capacity [veh/h] 1190 1012 102 1422 190 170
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1870 1589 1781 1870 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.09 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.76 0.11 0.11
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 38 38 3 46 6 6
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C L R
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
10 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-251
Item Number: 1.

Page 1382 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 4.63 4.56 34.20 1.92 27.81 30.17 Movement LOS A A C A C C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 4.60 14.71 29.05
Approach LOS A B C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.81
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.249
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 21.72
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 2.140 Crosswalk LOS F F B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 766 1065 666 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 11.44 6.56 13.37
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.050 1.830 1.560 Bicycle LOS B A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
11 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-252
Item Number: 1.

Page 1383 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.438
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
12 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-253
Item Number: 1.

Page 1384 of 2517 ends

Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 68 262 72 129 158 23 42 149 36 62 124 118 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 17 65 18 32 39 6 11 37 9 15 31 29 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 0.9250 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 63 242 67 119 146 21 39 138 33 57 115 109 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 8 25 0 50 26 0 0 9 9 0 9 50
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 15 0 29 14 0 0 5 5 0 5 30 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Proportion of CAVs [%] 0.00
Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 48 192 64 38 101 20 37 118 18 54 96 28 Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
13 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-254
Item Number: 1.

Page 1385 of 2517 ends

Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 14 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Walk [s] 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 27 0 0 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 8.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Isolated
Cycle Length [s] 60
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
14 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-255
Item Number: 1.

Page 1386 of 2517 ends

95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 123.64 23.14 70.19 52.83 7.15 48.58 8.46 85.57 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.95 0.93 2.81 2.11 0.29 1.94 0.34 3.42 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 68.69 12.85 38.99 29.35 3.97 26.99 4.70 47.54 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.75 0.51 1.56 1.17 0.16 1.08 0.19 1.90 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No No No Yes
Lane Group LOS B B C B B A A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 15.37 12.87 25.29 13.49 12.40 8.72 7.66 9.98 X, volume / capacity 0.48 0.12 0.45 0.23 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.34 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.51 0.10 1.10 0.17 0.03 0.50 0.11 1.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 14.86 12.77 24.19 13.32 12.37 8.22 7.55 8.93 c, Capacity [veh/h] 694 576 287 678 576 928 801 890
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1715 1589 1046 1870 1589 1696 1589 1623 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.19 0.05 0.12 0.08 0.01 0.11 0.02 0.19 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.50 0.50 0.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 22 22 22 22 22 30 30 30
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Lane Group C R L C R C R C
Lane Group Calculations
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
15 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-256
Item Number: 1.

Page 1387 of 2517 ends

Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 15.37 15.37 12.87 25.29 13.49 12.40 8.72 8.72 7.66 9.98 9.98 9.98 Movement LOS B B B C B B A A A A A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.92 18.32 8.56 9.98
Approach LOS B B A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.40
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.438
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 21.68 21.68 21.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.499 2.388 2.459 Crosswalk LOS F B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 966 966 766 766 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 8.01 8.01 11.41 11.41
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.223 2.071 1.934 2.061 Bicycle LOS B B A B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
16 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-257
Item Number: 1.

Page 1388 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.503
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 4: Little Morongo Rd (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 836.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 64 177 48 59 89 22 30 239 32 31 227 89 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 16 44 12 15 22 6 7 60 8 8 57 22 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 0.9421 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 60 167 45 56 84 21 28 225 30 29 214 84 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 19 5 0 20 0 In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 52 159 43 53 80 10 17 196 24 28 185 80 Name Little Morongo Rd Little Morongo Rd Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
17 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-258
Item Number: 1.

Page 1389 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 14.32
Approach LOS C B C B
Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.02 12.34 15.28 13.88
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 68.22 32.31 69.91 4.18 64.16 12.71 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 2.73 1.29 2.80 0.17 2.57 0.51 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.49 0.31 0.50 0.05 0.48 0.15
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 585 554 535 605 539 610 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
18 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-259
Item Number: 1.

Page 1390 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.061
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 5: Project Dwy (NS) at Pierson Blvd (EW)
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 25.00 55.00 55.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 29 71 72 198 192 29
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 18 18 49 48 7
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 27 65 66 182 177 27
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 17 41 41 0 0 17
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 10 24 25 0 0 10
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 173 168 0
Name Pierson Blvd Pierson Blvd
Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
19 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-260
Item Number: 1.

Page 1391 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.82
Approach LOS B A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 11.08 2.07 0.00
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.58 12.58 3.12 3.12 0.00 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.50 0.50 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A A
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 13.43 10.11 7.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
20 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-261
Item Number: 1.

Page 1392 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.099
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 14.6
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 6: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project North Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 43 308 220 43 42 43
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 11 77 55 11 11 11
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 40 283 202 40 39 40
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 25 8 8 25 25 25
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 15 5 5 15 14 15
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 257 180 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project North Dwy Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
21 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-262
Item Number: 1.

Page 1393 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.02
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.96 0.00 12.64
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 1.83 1.83 0.00 0.00 13.41 13.41 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 Movement LOS A A A A B B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.64 10.68 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.05
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
22 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-263
Item Number: 1.

Page 1394 of 2517 ends

Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.041
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 16.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 7th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 7: Indian Canyon Dr (NS) at Project South Dwy (EW) Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 55.00 55.00 25.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 1 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Thru Thru Right Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 86 337 249 14 14 86
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 21 84 62 4 4 21
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 79 310 229 13 13 79
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 49 25 25 8 8 50
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 30 15 15 5 5 29
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 1.0510 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 257 180 0 0 0
Name Indian Canyon Dr Indian Canyon Dr Project South Dwy Volumes
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
23 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-264
Item Number: 1.

Page 1395 of 2517 ends

Intersection LOS C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 2.31
Approach LOS A A B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.60 0.00 11.40
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 3.76 3.76 0.00 0.00 13.23 13.23 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Movement LOS A A A A C B
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.52 10.56 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.11
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 0 0
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh] 0 0 0
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Free Free Stop
Intersection Settings
Build out with 3 driveways Year 2027
24 2/16/2023
PM Peak Hour
Phase II with 3 driveways Year 2027
Scenario 6: 6 Opening Year With Project Phase II
Beyond Food Mart Indian Canyon & Pierson
Version 2022 (SP 0-8)
Generated with
APX-265
Item Number: 1.

Page 1396 of 2517 ends

APPENDIX E

OTHER DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
APX-266
Item Number: 1.

Page 1397 of 2517 ends

1 Perrie Ilercil
From: Melissa Purcell <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 6:00 PM
To: Perrie Ilercil
Cc: Jilleen Ferris; Cheryl Tubbs ([email protected]); Patricia Villagomez; Colleen Michael
Subject: RE: Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon/Pierson) - RFI cumulative projects listing Hello and Good evening Perrie,
I hope you’re having a lovely day and this message finds you in the best of spirits.

After speaking with the Planning Department regarding your request, it has been determined that there aren’t any new or on-going projects within a 2-mile radius of the NWC of Indian Canyon Drive and Pierson Boulevard. The only project taking place is homes being built by Lennar, but that is outside of the 2-mile radius you requested.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. I hope the rest of your week is wonderful.

From: Perrie Ilercil <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 8:44 AM
To: Melissa Purcell <[email protected]>
Cc: Jilleen Ferris <[email protected]>; Cheryl Tubbs ([email protected]) <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon/Pierson) - RFI cumulative projects listing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of our organization. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the content is safe. Thank you.

Good Morning Melissa,
APX-267
Item Number: 1.

Page 1398 of 2517 ends

&55*3).= +
97&++.( 8.,3&1 <&77&39 <4708-**98
APX-268
Item Number: 1.

Page 1399 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - AM
Major Street Name = Pierson Boulevad Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 462 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Project Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 99 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 462
99 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-269
Item Number: 1.

Page 1400 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - PM
Major Street Name = Pierson Boulevad Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 452 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 2
Minor Street Name = Project Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 92 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 452
92 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-270
Item Number: 1.

Page 1401 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - AM
Major Street Name = Indian Caynon Drive Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 564 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Project North Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 85 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 564
85 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-271
Item Number: 1.

Page 1402 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - PM
Major Street Name = Indian Caynon Drive Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 565 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Project North Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 79 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 565
79 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-272
Item Number: 1.

Page 1403 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - AM
Major Street Name = Indian Caynon Drive Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 637 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Project South Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 99 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 637
99 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-273
Item Number: 1.

Page 1404 of 2517 ends

PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Rural Areas)
Opening Year (2027) With Project - PM
Major Street Name = Indian Caynon Drive Total of Both Approaches (VPH) = 631 Number of Approach Lanes Major Street = 1
Minor Street Name = Project South Driveway High Volume Approach (VPH) = 92 Number of Approach Lanes Minor Street = 1

SIGNAL WARRANT NOT SATISFIED
** NOTE:
100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. 631
92 0
100
200
300
400
500
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Minor Street - High V
olume A
p
proach - V
P
H
Major Street - Total of Both Approaches - VPH
1 Lane (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor)
2+ Lanes (Major) & 1 Lane (Minor) OR 1 Lane (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor) 2+ Lanes (Major) & 2+ Lanes (Minor)
Major Street Approaches
Minor Street Approaches
APX-274
Item Number: 1.

Page 1405 of 2517 ends

Item Number: 1.

Page 1406 of 2517 ends

transportation ■ noise ■ air quality | GANDDINI GROUP
555 Parkcenter Drive, Suite 225, Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 795-3100 | ganddini.com
August 3, 2022
Mr. Amir Butt
4300 Edison Avenue
Chino, California 91710
RE: Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon & Pierson) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment Project No. 19543
Dear Mr. Butt:

Ganddini Group, Inc. is pleased to provide this Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment for the proposed Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon & Pierson) in the City of Desert Hot Springs. The purpose of this screening assessment is to provide a preliminary review of the proposed project’s potential for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts with respect to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. We trust the findings of this analysis will aid you and the City of Desert Hot Springs in assessing the project.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The 3.99-acre project site is located at northwest corner of the Indian Canyon Drive and Pierson Boulevard intersection in the City of Desert Hot Springs California. The project site is zoned MU-N (Mixed Use – Neighborhood) and currently undeveloped. The proposed project involves construction of a commercial development consisting of a convenience store/gas station (7,460 square foot) including drive through window and 16 vehicle fueling positions, one automated car wash tunnel (1,790 square foot), and two-2,000 square foot quick-service-restaurants with drive through windows (4,000 square feet). Vehicular access is proposed to be provided by two driveways at Indian Canyon Drive and one driveway at Pierson Boulevard.

The proposed site plan is shown in Attachment A.

PROJECT TRIPS
Table 1 shows the proposed project trips based on trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021) for Land Use Code 945 (Convenience Store Gas Station ), Land Use Code 948 (Automated Car Wash), and Land Use Code 934 (Fastfood Restaurant with Drive Through Window). The project trips calculated from the ITE land use code 945 which apply by either square footage or fuel positions varies by more than 25%; therefore, an average of the resulting trips has been calculated for use on this project. Applicable internal capture and pass-by trip reductions as prescribed in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017) have been applied to the net trip generation. Internal capture worksheets are included in Attachment B.

As shown in Table 1, the proposed project is forecast to result in a total of approximately 9,218 new daily trips, including 227 new trips during the AM peak hour and 233 new trips during the PM peak hour.

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED SCREENING CRITERIA (CEQA)
Transportation assessments within the City of Desert Hot Springs use the County of Riverside Transportation Guidelines. The VMT screening assessment has been prepared in accordance with the County of Riverside Item Number: 1.

Page 1407 of 2517 ends

Mr. Amir Butt
August 3, 2022
Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon & Pierson)
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment
2 19543
Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service & Vehicle Miles Traveled, (December 2020) [County Guidelines], which were developed based on guidance from the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (State of California, December 2018) [“OPR Technical Advisory”]. The County Guidelines identify screening criteria for certain types of projects that typically reduce VMT and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. The project need only satisfy one of the following screening criteria:
 Small Projects
▫ Projects generate less greenhouse gas emissions than threshold criteria1 ▫ Projects with trip generate less than net new 110 daily vehicle2 trips (ADT)  Projects near High Quality Transit
▫ Projects located within one-half mile radius of major transit stop3 or high-quality transit corridor4  Local Servicing Retail
▫ Retail land use projects no single store on-site exceeds 50,000 square feet  Affordable Housing
▫ High percentage of lower-income housing as determined by County Planning and Transportation  Local Essential Service
▫ Local serving Day Care Center
▫ Police or Fire Facility
▫ Medical/Dental Office Building less than 50,000 square feet ▫ Government Offices
▫ Local or Community Parks
 Map Based Screening
□ Site location can be verified with the web-based or map-based VMT Screening Tool5  Redevelopment Projects
▫ Existing project expansion and redevelopment projects up to 10,000 square feet6

1. Based on South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) threshold of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, projects generating greenhouse gas emissions less than 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTC02e) per year may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact.
2 As noted in OPR Technical Advisory, the term vehicle refers to on-road passenger vehicles, specifically cars and light trucks. Heavyduty trucks should only be included in a traffic impact analysis for modeling convenience and ease of calculation (e.g., where data provided combine auto and heavy freight VMT) (CEQA Guidelines, § 15064.3, subd. (a)). Therefore, heavy-duty trucks should not contribute to a finding of significant traffic (VMT) impact. 3 A major transit stop is defined as an existing rail transit station, ferry terminal with bus or rail service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with less than 15-minute headways during the peak commute hours (Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3.). 4 Fixed route bus service with less than 15-minute headways during the peak commute hours (Pub. Resources Code, § 21155). 5 The WRCOG VMT Screening Tool was developed from the Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) travel forecasting model to measure VMT performance for individual jurisdictions and for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). 6 As noted in OPR Technical Advisory, CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities and additions to existing structures up to 10,000 square feet so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planning development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).).

Item Number: 1.

Page 1408 of 2517 ends

Mr. Amir Butt
August 3, 2022
Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon & Pierson)
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment
3 19543

LOCAL SERVING RETAIL SCREENING
The County Guidelines identifies local-serving retail land uses as presumed to have less than significant VMT impacts for the retail portion of the project. For the determination of local-serving, the retail land use should not exceed 50,000 square feet of gross floor area. For mixed use projects with retail land uses less than 50,000 square feet, the remaining portion of the project excluding the retail land use may be subject to further VMT screening or analysis. For projects with retail land uses greater than 50,000 square feet, the project in its entirety will need to evaluate the project’s VMT impact.

The proposed project consists of less than 50,000 square feet of local serving retail uses; therefore, the proposed project satisfies the County-established retail project site plan screening criteria and may be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact.

CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project consists of 13,250 square feet commercial retail which is forecast to result in a new increase of approximately 9,218 daily trips, including 227 trips during the AM peak hour and 233 trips during the PM peak hour.

It has been a pleasure to assist you with this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 795-3100.

Sincerely,
GANDDINI GROUP, INC.

Perrie Ilercil, P.E. (AZ) Giancarlo Ganddini, PE, PTP
Senior Engineer Principal
Item Number: 1.

Page 1409 of 2517 ends

Land Use Source1
% In % Out Rate % In % Out Rate
Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Through Window ITE 933 58% 42% 43.18 50% 50% 33.21 450.49 Convenience Store Gas Station (5.5-10 ksf GFA) ITE 945 50% 50% 31.60 50% 50% 26.90 345.75 Convenience Store Gas Station (16-24 VFP) ITE 945 50% 50% 91.35 50% 50% 78.95 1,283.38 Automated Car Wash ITE 948 350% 50% 34.44 50% 50% 77.50 861.11 Land Use Source In Out Total In Out Total
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window ITE 934 4.000 TSF 91 87 178 69 63 132 1,870 Internal Capture Trips ITE4-39 -12 -51 -20 -26 -46 -97
Pass-by Trips (50%AM, 55%PM) ITE 9345-26 -38 -64 -27 -20 -47 -111 Subtotal 26 37 63 22 17 39 1,662
Convenience Store Gas Station (7.49 TSF; 16 VFP)
Convenience Store Gas Station (5.5-10 ksf GFA) ITE 945 16 VFP 253 253 506 215 215 430 5,532 Convenience Store Gas Station (16-24 VFP) ITE 945 7.460 TSF 341 340 681 294 295 589 9,574 Average6ITE 945 297 297 594 255 255 510 7,553
Internal Capture Trips ITE4-12 -39 -51 -26 -20 -46 -97
Pass-by Trips (76%AM, 75%PM) ITE 9455-217 -196 -413 -172 -176 -348 -761 Subtotal 68 62 130 57 59 116 6,695
Automated Car Wash ITE 948 1 CWT 17 17 34 39 39 78 861
Subtotal - Gross Project Trips 405 401 806 363 357 720 10,284 Total Internal Capture Trips (13%AM, 13%PM) -51 -51 -102 -46 -46 -92 -194 Subtotal - External Project Trips 354 350 704 317 311 628 10,090 Total Pass-by Trips -243 -234 -477 -199 -196 -395 -872
TOTAL NEW TRIPS GENERATED 111 116 227 118 115 233 9,218 Notes:

1. 2. TSF = Thousand Square Feet; VFP = Vehicle Fuel Position; CWT = Car Wash Tunnel.

3. 4.

5. 6. ITE provides two sets of trip rates that can be used to estimate trip generation for the proposed Convenience Store Gas Station land use: 1) trips per vehicle fueling position for convenience stores with 5.5-10.0 thousand square feet, and 2) trips per thousand square feet of convenience store with 16-24 vehicle fueling positions. Since the project trip estimate varies by more than 25% depending on which rates are used, an average of both estimates was used to provide a reasonable forecast for this analysis.

TSF
VFP
Pass-by rates calculated in accordance with procedures in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017). Daily pass-by is calculated as the sum of the AM and PM pass-by trips.

Internal capture rates calculated in accordance with procedures in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition, 2017). The daily internal capture is equal to the sum of the AM and PM peak hour internal trips. See Attachment A for internal capture worksheets.

Quantity
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily
ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021); ### = Land Use Code.

All rates based on General Urban/Suburban setting.

San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates (April 2002). Where the daily or peak hour rate is not provided by ITE, the SANDAG percentage of peak hour to daily rate is used to calculate the missing data. Where the peak hour distribution is not provided by ITE, the SANDAG peak hour distribution is used.

TSF
CWT
Trips Generated
Table 1
Project Trip Generation
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Variable2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Rate
Beyond Food Mart (Indian Canyon Pierson)
Transportation Study Screening Assessment
4 19543
Item Number: 1.

Page 1410 of 2517 ends

ATTACHMENT A

SITE PLAN
Apx-1
Item Number: 1.

Page 1411 of 2517 ends

NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING EV EV 8'-4 1/16" T NO PARKING NO

PARKING

NO EV EV PARKING T INDIAN AVENUE
PIERSON BOULEVARD N00°30'25"E 664.95'
N89°52'08"W 277.81' N00°31'23"E 625.14'
N89°49'53"W 277.63'
NO

PARKING PROPOSED SITE PLAN
A1.01

S H E E T

OF SHEETS

REVISIONS
TL/ZL
TL
TL NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NW CNR OF PIERSONS & N. INDIAN CANYON RD., DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CA AMIR BUTT 1461 TAHOE ST., BEAUMONT, CA 92223
ALL IDEAS, DESIGNS, ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THESE DRAWINGS ARE OWNED BY, AND THE PROPERTY OF PEGASUS ARCHITECTS AND PROTECTED BY THE CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT, AND OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS. THESE DRAWINGS WERE CREATED, EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF PEGASUS ARCHITECTS. THESE DRAWINGS ARE NOT VALID FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNLESS EXPRESSED CERTIFIED BY PEGASUS ARCHITECTURE FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY. COPYRIGHT © 2022 PEGASUS ARCHITECTS.

SITE #1169
Apx-2
Item Number: 1.

Page 1412 of 2517 ends

ATTACHMENT B

INTERNAL CAPTURE WORKSHEETS
Apx-3
Item Number: 1.

Page 1413 of 2517 ends

Project Name: Organization:

Project Location: Performed By:

Scenario Description: Date:

Analysis Year: Checked By:

Analysis Period: Date:

ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 0
Retail ITE 945 16 / 7.490 VFP / TSF 594 297 297
Restaurant ITE 934 4.000 TSF 178 91 87
Cinema/Entertainment 0
Residential 0
Hotel 0
All Other Land Uses2
ITE 948 1 CWT 34 17 17
806 405 401
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 0 0 0 0
Retail 0 39 0 0
Restaurant 0 12 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0 0 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 806 405 401 Office N/A N/A
Internal Capture Percentage 13% 13% 13% Retail 4% 13%
Restaurant 43% 14%
External Vehicle-Trips5 704 354 350 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential N/A N/A
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel N/A N/A
NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
Table 1-A: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment
Development Data (For Information Only )
0 0
0 Estimated Vehicle-Trips3
Land Use
Gas Station, Convenience Market & Fast-food
Table 2-A: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Table 4-A: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Destination (To)
Origin (From)
Origin (From)
Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Land Use
Entering Trips Exiting Trips
Table 3-A: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 Table 5-A: Computations Summary Table 6-A: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 2 Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A. 1 Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 6Person-Trips
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-A vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to Tables 5-A, 9-A (O and D). Enter transit, non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete.

City of Desert Hot Springs (Indian Cyn & Pierson)
AM Street Peak Hour
GGI
PDI
2022
Project Trips 2022.0722
Apx-4
Item Number: 1.

Page 1414 of 2517 ends

Project Name: Organization:

Project Location: Performed By:

Scenario Description: Date:

Analysis Year: Checked By:

Analysis Period: Date:

ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 0
Retail ITE 945 16 / 7.490 VFP / TSF 510 255 255
Restaurant ITE 934 4.000 TSF 132 69 63
Cinema/Entertainment 0
Residential 0
Hotel 0
All Other Land Uses2
ITE 948 1.000 CWT 78 39 39
720 363 357
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 0 0 0 0
Retail 0 20 0 0
Restaurant 0 26 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0 0 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 720 363 357 Office N/A N/A
Internal Capture Percentage 13% 13% 13% Retail 10% 8%
Restaurant 29% 41%
External Vehicle-Trips5 628 317 311 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential N/A N/A
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel N/A N/A
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 Project Trips 2022.0722
2022
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Land Use
Development Data (For Information Only ) Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Land Use
Entering Trips Exiting Trips
NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
Gas Station, Convenience Market & Fast-food GGI
City of Desert Hot Springs (Indian Cyn & Pierson) PDI
Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From)
Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Origin (From)
Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0 0
0 0
0 Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be 6 Person-Trips
1 Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2 Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3 Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 5 Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P.

Apx-5
Item Number: 1.

Page 1415 of 2517 ends

JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET
General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
www.rcflood.org

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
258264
September 9, 2024
City of Desert Hot Springs
Planning Department
65-950 Pierson Boulevard
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240-3006
Attention: Patricia Villagomez Re: Pierson Commercial Specific Plan, APN 664-080-017
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.

District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.

The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received August 19, 2024. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue:
☐ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.
☒ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, West Desert Hot Springs Master Drainage Plan MC-G (unadopted). The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All regulatory permits (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facility construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. ☐ This project proposes channels, storm drains larger than 36 inches in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions Item Number: 1.

Page 1416 of 2517 ends

City of Desert Hot Springs - 2 - September 9, 2024
Re: Pierson Commercial Specific Plan,
APN 664-080-017 258264
shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. ☒ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, Mission Creek Channel. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ☐ The District's previous comments are still valid.

GENERAL INFORMATION
The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document, and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply such as but not limited to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, California Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The District’s action associated with the subject project triggers evaluation by the District with respect to applicant's compliance with Federal, State and local environmental laws. For this Project, the Lead Agency is the City of Riverside, and the District is a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The District, as a Co-permittee under the MSHCP, needs to demonstrate that all District related activities, including the actions identified above, are consistent with MSHCP. This is typically achieved through determinations from the CEQA Lead Agency (if they are also a Co-permittee) for the project. For the MSHCP, the District's focus will be particular to Sections 6.1.2,

6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.5.3 and Appendix C of the MSHCP. Please include consistency determination statements from the Lead Agency/Co-permittee for the project for each of these sections in the CEQA document.

The District may also require that an applicant provide supporting technical documentation for environmental clearance.

This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.

If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.

Very truly yours,

AMY MCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager
EM:blj
Item Number: 1.

Page 1417 of 2517 ends

MSWD Mission: Provide, Protect, and Preserve our Most Valuable Resource…Water Mission Springs Water District is a Groundwater Guardian Affiliate 66575 Second Street, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240  www.mswd.org • p 760.329.6448  f 760.329.2482 Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs 11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
Transmitted via email to: [email protected]
Date: September 8, 2024
Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pierson Commercial Specific Plan in the City of Desert Hot Springs
Dear Ms. Villagomez,
Mission Springs Water District (MSWD or District) appreciates the opportunity to review the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Pierson Commercial Specific Plan, with the City of Desert Hot Springs as the Lead Agency.

It is our understanding that the proposed Project consists of the Pierson Commercial Specific Plan (Specific Plan) to construct and operate a 9-island fueling station, a 7,460 square-foot convenience store with a drive-thru for pre-packed food pick-up, a 1,790 square-foot drive-thru carwash, and a 2,000 square-foot quick service restaurant. The Project is located in the City of Desert Hot Springs within MSWD’s water and wastewater collection service area, located on the northwest corner of Pierson Boulevard and Indian Canyon Drive. The Project will connect to MSWD sewer and water services in order to operate.

MSWD offers the following comments on the Initial Study that has been prepared for the Project:
• Under Air Quality, the discussion of gas dispensing emissions and health risk appear to be touched on only briefly. The SCAQMD has published a Risk Assessment Procedures document for Rules 1401, 1401.1 & 212 which provides screening-level risk estimates for gasoline dispensing operations. The analysis should be revised to include a discussion of gasoline dispensing related health risk impacts.
• Under Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas, is there a reason why CalEEMod 2020 was utilized rather than the more current model, 2022?
• MSWD appreciates the robust discussion of groundwater management and water availability under Hydrology, issue (b), and concurs with the impact conclusions made therein, excepting the discrepancy between the water demand projections under Hydrology and Utilities and Service Systems, discussed in detail in the next bullet point. • The Project water demand on page 50 and 74 are vastly different. On Page 50, the water demand is listed at 10,000 gallons per day, or 3,650,000 million gallons per year, whereas the analysis on page 74 indicates that the proposed Project would have a demand of 949,411 gallons per year with an “allocation” of 2,189,718 gallons per year, which is substantially less than that which is projected on Page 50. The correct amount of water demanded Item Number: 1.

Page 1418 of 2517 ends

by the proposed Project should be clarified in the Final IS/MND, and the impact determination should be corrected if, indeed, the Project’s water demand is greater than that which is projected for a land use of this type in the Coachella Valley RUMWP. • The analysis under issue E for Hydrology and Water Quality, there is no discussion of the sustainable groundwater management act. There are two groundwater sustainability management plans that are applicable to the groundwater extracted by MSWD. The Mission Creek Subbasin Alternative Update and the Indio Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan. As the Project will receive water from MSWD, which pumps groundwater from both the Indio and Mission Creek Subbasins, each of these plans should be outlined, and the Project impacts should detail why the provisions of these Plans would not be violated as a result of Project implementation to ensure that this issue (E) has been fully substantiated.

Beyond the above comments, the underlying groundwater quality is of the utmost importance to the District, and MSWD wishes to make clear that the use of Underground Storage Tanks for hazardous materials, such as gasoline, within its service area should not result in any contaminated runoff as part of Project operations. While these are standard conditions of permits the Applicant will be required to obtain from the State and RWQCB, and other regulatory agencies to operate, MSWD, as a stakeholder of the groundwater basin that underlies the site, emphasizes the need for these standard permit conditions to be enforced and to remain enforced throughout the duration of Project operation.

MSWD appreciate the opportunity to comment on this Initial Study/MND. Should you have any other questions or require additional information, please contact me by phone at 760.329.6448 ext. 122 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Eric Weck, P.E.

Engineering Manager
Mission Springs Water District
Item Number: 1.

Page 1419 of 2517 ends

State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Inland Deserts Region
3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764
www.wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870
September 13, 2024
Sent via email
Patricia Villagomez
Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240
[email protected]
Pierson Commercial Specific Plan Project (PROJECT)
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
SCH# 2024080608
Dear Patricia Villagomez:

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Availability and Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) from the City of Desert Hot Springs (City) for the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.
1 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife.

Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code.

CDFW ROLE
CDFW is California’s Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (Id., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on Projects and related

1CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 et seq. The “CEQA Guidelines” are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000.

Item Number: 1.

Page 1420 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 2 ends

activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources.

CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. (Pub.

Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381.) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, for example, the Project may be subject to CDFW’s lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority. (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.) Likewise, to the extent implementation of the Project as proposed may result in “take” as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), the Project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY
Proponent: Beyond Food Mart, Inc.

Objective: The Project proposes the construction and operation of a 9-island fueling station, a 7,460-square-foot convenience store with a drive-thru for pre-packed food pick-up, a 1,790-square-foot drive-thru carwash, a 2,000-square-foot quick service restaurant. The Project will have 61,941 square feet of perimeter and internal landscaping and will include artificial nighttime lighting for security and safety purposes.

The Project will include 83 car parking spaces and 8 electric vehicle parking spaces.

Operation will be 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

Location: The Project site is an approximately 3.99-acre parcel (Assessor’s Parcel No. 664-080-017) located at the northwest corner of Pierson Boulevard and North Indian Canyon Road in the City of Desert Hot Springs, County of Riverside, California.

Timeframe: Project construction is proposed to begin in 2024 and will take approximately 14 months.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CDFW has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species (i.e., biological resources). CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. The MND has not adequately identified and disclosed the Project’s impacts (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative) on biological resources and whether those impacts are reduced to less than significant.

CDFW’s comments and recommendations on the MND are explained in greater detail below and summarized here. CDFW is concerned that the MND does not adequately Item Number: 1.

Page 1421 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 3 ends

identify or mitigate the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW also concludes that the MND lacks sufficient information to facilitate a meaningful review by CDFW, including a complete and accurate assessment of biological resources on the Project site. CDFW requests that additional information and analyses be added to a revised MND, along with avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures that avoid or reduce impacts to less than significant.

Existing Environmental Setting
Compliance with CEQA is predicated on a complete and accurate description of the environmental setting that may be affected by the proposed Project. CDFW is concerned that the assessment of the existing environmental setting has not been adequately analyzed in the MND. CDFW is concerned that without a complete and accurate description of the existing environmental setting, the MND may provide an incomplete analysis of Project-related environmental impacts.

The MND lacks a complete assessment of biological resources within the Project site and surrounding area specifically as it relates to an assessment of biological resources specifically for special-status plants, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), and desert kit fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus). A complete and accurate assessment of the environmental setting and Project-related impacts to special status plants, burrowing owl, and desert kit fox is needed to both identify appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures and demonstrate that these measures reduce Project impacts to less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
CEQA requires that a MND include mitigation measures to avoid or reduce significant impacts. CDFW is concerned that the mitigation measures proposed in the MND are not adequate to avoid or reduce impacts to biological resources to below a level of significance. To support the City in ensuring that Project impacts to biological resources are reduced to less than significant, CDFW recommends adding mitigation measures for burrowing owl, desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii), desert kit fox, American badger (Taxidea taxus), special-status plants, artificial nighttime lighting, and the CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Program, as well as revising the mitigation measure for nesting birds.
1) Assessment of Biological Resources
Regarding Little San Bernardino Mountains linanthus (Linanthus maculatus ssp. maculatus; California Rare Plan Rank (CRPR) 1B2; Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) Covered Species), page 38 of the Project’s Biological Resources Assessment (Biological Assessment), dated July 2022 and updated June 2024, indicates that “suitable habitat for this species does not occur on Item Number: 1.

Page 1422 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 4 ends

site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site.” Data from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), accessed using CDFW’s Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS), includes a relatively recent (2001) observation of Little San Bernardino Mountains linanthus that overlaps with the Project site. Also, the Biological Assessment indicates that a general reconnaissance survey within the Project site was conducted on July 18, 2022, outside of the bloom period for Little San Bernardino Mountains linanthus. Similarly for Coachella Valley milkvetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae; CRPR 1B2; CVMSHCP Covered Species), the Biological Assessment (page 34) concluded that “suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site.” However, the Project site contains CVMSHCP modeled habitat for this species, and the general reconnaissance survey was conducted outside of the typical bloom period for this species. For these reasons, CDFW is concerned about the accuracy of the conclusions in the MND that the Project site does not contain suitable habitat for Little San Bernardino Mountains linanthus, Coachella Valley milk vetch, and potentially other special-status plant species.

Using surveys implemented according to recommended protocols and conducted during the appropriate time(s) of the year is an important step in adequately disclosing potential impacts to special-status native plants and sensitive natural communities.

CDFW’s Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities2 provides the following guidance on timing and number of visits: “Conduct botanical field surveys in the field at the times of year when plants will be both evident and identifiable. Usually this is during flowering or fruiting. Space botanical field survey visits throughout the growing season to accurately determine what plants exist in the Project area. This usually involves multiple visits to the Project area (e.g., in early, mid, and late-season) to capture the floristic diversity at a level necessary to determine if special status plants are present.3 The timing and number of visits necessary to determine if special status plants are present is determined by geographic location, the natural communities present, and the weather patterns of the year(s) in which botanical field surveys are conducted.” The findings of appropriate botanical field surveys for special-status native plants and sensitive natural communities are important in informing appropriate avoidance, minimization, and

2 Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, March 20, 2018. Link:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=18959&inline 3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories for Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants available at: https://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/ Survey-Protocols-Guidelines/
Item Number: 1.

Page 1423 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 5 ends

mitigation measures and supporting the City in demonstrating that Project impacts are reduced to less than significant.

CDFW recommends that the City include in a revised MND the results of a recent and thorough floristic-based assessment of special-status plants and natural communities performed by a qualified biologist and following CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special-Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (CDFW 2018 or most recent version). Based on findings from a recent floristic-based assessment, CDFW recommends that the MND is revised to include an analysis of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to biological resources and identification of appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.

To support the City in reducing impacts to special-status plants to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the following mitigation measure is added to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[A]: Special-Status Plants
Prior to Project construction activities, a thorough, recent, floristic-based assessment of special-status plants and natural communities, following CDFW’s Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities (see
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Plants) shall be performed by a qualified biologist. Should any state-listed plant species (excluding CVMSHCP Covered Species) be present in the Project area, the Project proponent shall obtain appropriate CESA authorization for those species prior to the start of Project activities. Should any species of native plants designated as rare, threatened, or endangered by state law (excluding CVMSHCP Covered Species) be present in the Project area, on-site or off-site habitat restoration (whichever is applicable) and/or enhancement and preservation should be evaluated and discussed in detail. Where habitat preservation is not available on-site, off-site land acquisition, management, and preservation should be evaluated.

Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, section 15097(f), CDFW has prepared a draft mitigation monitoring and reporting program (MMRP) in Attachment 1 for revised Mitigation Measure BIO-1, as well as CDFW-recommended Biological Resources Mitigation Measures A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
2) Nesting Birds
It is the Project proponent’s responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: section 3503 states that it is unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise Item Number: 1.

Page 1424 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 6 ends

provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.).

With regard to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), per its associated Implementing Agreement and Permits from the Wildlife Agencies, Take associated with Covered Activities will not be in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and will be consistent with Fish and Game Code sections 3503 and 3503.5; therefore, Covered Activities within and outside Conservation Areas must undertake measures to avoid the take of individuals, nests, and eggs of nesting birds. General conservation measures for all bird species, per CVMSHCP Section 9.7, indicate that Permittees avoid impacts to Habitat during nesting season.

Page 25 ends

contain habitat suitable for nesting birds.” The MND includes Mitigation Measure BIO-1 for nesting birds, which indicates that the “nesting bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through September 15 in southern California and specifically, March 15 through August 31 for migratory passerine birds. To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special status) during the nesting season, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre-construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3 days prior to Project-related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests.” CDFW finds this measure to be insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant. CDFW is concerned about impacts to nesting birds including loss of nesting/foraging habitat and potential take from ground-disturbing activities and construction. Conducting work outside the peak nesting season is an important avoidance and minimization measure. CDFW also recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure that impacts to nesting birds are avoided. The timing of the nesting season varies greatly depending on several factors, such as bird species, weather conditions in any given year, and longterm climate changes (e.g., drought, warming, etc.). In response to warming, birds have been reported to breed earlier, thereby reducing temperatures that nests are exposed to during breeding and tracking shifts in availability of resources (Socolar et al., 20174).

CDFW staff have observed that climate change conditions may result in nesting bird season occurring earlier and later in the year than historical nesting season dates.

4 Socolar JB, Epanchin PN, Beissinger SR and Tingley MW (2017). Phenological shifts conserve thermal niches.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(49): 12976-12981.

Item Number: 1.

Page 1425 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 7 ends

CDFW recommends that disturbance of occupied nests of migratory birds and raptors within the Project site and surrounding area be avoided any time birds are nesting onsite. CDFW therefore recommends the completion of nesting bird surveys regardless of the time of year to ensure compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to nesting and migratory birds.

To support the City in reducing impacts to nesting birds to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends that the City revise Mitigation Measure BIO-1 with the following additions in bold and removals in strikethrough:

Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior.

The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre-construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on-site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. Nesting bird nesting season generally extends from February 1 through September 15 in southern California and specifically, March 15 through August 31 for migratory passerine birds.

To avoid impacts to nesting birds (common and special status) during the nesting season, a qualified Avian Biologist will conduct pre-construction Nesting Bird Surveys (NBS) no more than 3 days prior to Project-related disturbance to nestable vegetation to identify any active nests. If no active nests are found, no further action will be required.

If an active nest is found, the biologist will set appropriate no-work buffers around the nest which will be based upon the nesting species, its sensitivity to disturbance, nesting stage, and expected types, intensity, and duration of the disturbance. The nests and buffer zones shall be field-checked weekly by a qualified biological monitor. The approved no-work buffer zone shall be clearly marked in the field, within which no disturbance activity shall commence until the qualified biologist has determined the young birds have successfully fledged and the nest is inactive.

Item Number: 1.

Page 1426 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 8 ends

3) Burrowing Owl
Western burrowing owl is a California Species of Special Concern. It is unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the order Strigiformes, including western burrowing owls, except as otherwise provided in the Fish and Game Code and related regulations. (Fish & G. Code, § 3503.5.) It is also unlawful to take, possess, or destroy western burrowing owl nests or eggs, except as otherwise provided in the Fish and Game Code and related regulations. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 3503, 3503.5.) State law also explicitly incorporates the prohibitions on take and possession set forth in the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. (Fish & G. Code, § 3513.)
With regard to the CVMSHCP, the CDFW Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit #2835-2008-001-06 does not provide Take Authorization for burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs. To the contrary, section 3.5.6 of the NCCP Permit states burrowing owl “pairs or individuals will not be Taken” and reiterates that the “HCP/NCCP does not authorize Take of [burrowing owl] nests [or] eggs[.]” Therefore, throughout the CVMSHCP area—both within and without Conservation Areas— Permittees must ensure that activities occurring within their jurisdictions do not result in the take, possession, or destruction of burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs. Any activity occurring within the CVMSHCP area that results in the take of burrowing owl individuals, nests, or eggs would be unlawful and would not be a Covered Activity under the CVMSHCP.

Page 25 ends

this species. No burrowing owls were observed during the site visit. No burrows of any kind were located within the Project Site. No portion of the Project Site showed any evidence of past or present BUOW activity. No feathers, whitewash, or castings were found and no suitable burrow surrogate species are present on-site. Therefore, no suitable habitat exists on-site and no focused surveys are required.” The Biological Assessment indicates that a general reconnaissance survey within the Project site was conducted on July 18, 2022. CDFW generally considers biological field assessments for wildlife to be valid for a one-year period. The MND and its supporting documents do not indicate if a habitat assessment or focused surveys for burrowing owl, conducted independently of surveys for other species, were completed. Given the MND’s lack of findings from a recent habitat assessment and focused surveys for burrowing owl following the guidelines in the `Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation,5the number of

5 California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2012. Staff report on burrowing owl mitigation. State of California, Natural Resources Agency. Available for download at:
https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=83843&inline Item Number: 1.

Page 1427 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 9 ends

suitable and occupied burrows within the Project site and surrounding areas is unknown.

CDFW is also concerned with the MND’s conclusion that the Project site does not contain suitable habitat for burrowing owl. CDFW notes that in California, preferred habitat for burrowing owl is generally typified by short, sparse vegetation with few shrubs,6 and that burrowing owls may occur in ruderal grassy fields, vacant lots, and pastures if the vegetation structure is suitable and there are useable burrows and foraging habitat proximity.7 The Project’s biological assessment indicates that the “habitat on-site consists of a mix of Larrea tridentata - Ambrosia dumosa Shrubland Alliance (Creosote bush – white bursage scrub) and bare ground.” Based on review of historical aerial imagery using Google Earth and photos included in the Biological Assessment, the Project site and surrounding areas to the west, east, and north contain habitat with sparse cover of native vegetation that is suitable nesting and foraging habitat for burrowing owl. The California Natural Diversity Database includes an observation of burrowing owl approximately 0.5 miles to the northwest of the Project site in areas with similar habitat to the Project site. In addition, burrowing owls frequently move into disturbed areas prior to and during construction activities since they are adapted to highly modified habitats.8,9 The Project site contains suitable habitat for burrowing owl, and given the lack of recent surveys for burrowing owl, the status of burrowing owl presence within and surrounding the Project site is unknown. Further, CDFW staff, through their environmental review and permitting work, have observed in Desert Hot Springs one of the highest concentrations of burrowing owl in the Coachella Valley. CDFW is concerned that the Project has the potential to impact burrowing owl, yet the MND lacks appropriate analysis on presence of the species within the Project site and surrounding area and appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.

CDFW recommends the MND is revised to include the findings, including survey methods and survey reports, from recent focused burrowing owl surveys following the guidelines in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation along with appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. Adequate information about burrowing owls within and surrounding the Project site support CDFW in effectively assessing potential impacts and recommending appropriate avoidance, minimization,

6 Haug, E. A., B. A. Millsap, and M. S. Martell. 1993. Burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia), in A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C., USA.
7 Gervais, J. A., D. K. Rosenberg, R. G. Anthony. 2003. Space use and pesticide exposure risk of male burrowing owls in an agricultural landscape. Journal of Wildlife Management 67: 155-164. 8 Chipman, E. D., N. E. McIntyre, R. E. Strauss, M. C. Wallace, J. D. Ray, and C. W. Boal. 2008. Effects of human land use on western burrowing owl foraging and activity budgets. Journal of Raptor Research 42(2): 87-98. 9 Coulombe, H. N. 1971. Behavior and population ecology of the Burrowing Owl, Speotyto cunicularia, in the Imperial Valley of California. Condor 73:162–176.

Item Number: 1.

Page 1428 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 10 ends

and mitigation measures to support the City and Project proponent in reducing impacts to burrowing owls to a level less than significant.

To support the City in reducing impacts to burrowing owl to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[B]: Burrowing Owl Surveys
Suitable burrowing owl habitat has been confirmed on the site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version) prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall begin coordination with CDFW and USFWS immediately, and shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions.

The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval.

Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG, 2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. 4) Desert Tortoise
Item Number: 1.

Page 1429 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 11 ends

Page 9 ends

desert tortoises exists within the Project site. There are documented desert tortoise occurrences within 5 miles the Project site. However, these occurrences are within suitable habitat This species are not expected to occur within the Project area.

Additionally, the Project site is outside of the Designated Critical Habitat for this species.

Therefore, no potential direct or indirect impacts on desert tortoise can be identified, and presence/absence surveys for this species are not warranted or recommended.” The Project site contains CVMSHCP modeled habitat for desert tortoise. Desert tortoises can occupy a range of habitat types, and the CVMSHCP Section 9.6.1.5 indicates that desert tortoises “are found naturally along the northern, eastern, and western rim of the Coachella Valley in the foothills of the Little San Bernardino Mountains.” Unprocessed data in the California Natural Diversity Database indicates an observation of desert tortoise from 2023 within 2.2 miles of the Project site within similar habitat to the northwest. CDFW considers the Project site to contain suitable habitat for desert tortoise; however, the MND lacks measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate for impacts to desert tortoise. Per the CVMSHCP section 9.5.1.4 “both inside and outside Conservation Areas, avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures require relocation of individual tortoises if required surveys locate individuals on the site of Covered Activities. For more information about avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures see Section 4.4.”
To support the City in reducing impacts to desert tortoise to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[C]: Desert Tortoise Surveys
Prior to commencing Project activities, a focused survey for desert tortoise shall be conducted by a qualified biologist, according to protocols in Preparing for Any Action that May Occur within the Range of the Mojave Desert Tortoise (USFWS 2019;
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Mojave%20Desert%20Tortoise_ Pre-project%20Survey%20Protocol_2019.pdf). CDFW recommends working with USFWS and CDFW concurrently to ensure a consistent and adequate approach to planning survey work and that biologists retained to complete desert tortoise protocol-level surveys submit their qualifications to CDFW and USFWS prior to initiation of surveys. If desert tortoise is found to be present, the qualified biologist shall immediately notify CDFW and USFWS to determine appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.

No more than 14 calendar days prior to start of Project activities and after any pause in Project activities lasting 30 days or more, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys for desert tortoise as described in the USFWS 2019 desert tortoise survey methodology (Preparing for Any Action that May Item Number: 1.

Page 1430 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 12 ends

Occur within the Range of the Mojave Desert Tortoise;
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Mojave%20Desert%20Tortoise_ Pre-project%20Survey%20Protocol_2019.pdf). Pre-construction surveys shall be completed using perpendicular survey routes and 100-percent visual coverage for desert tortoise and their sign within the Project area and 50-foot buffer zone.

Pre-activity surveys cannot be combined with other surveys conducted for other species while using the same personnel. Results of the surveys shall be submitted to CDFW prior to construction start. If the pre-construction surveys confirm desert tortoise absence, the qualified biologist shall ensure desert tortoise do not enter the Project area. Should desert tortoise presence be confirmed during the survey, the qualified biologist shall immediately notify CDFW and USFWS to determine appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures.
5) Desert Kit Fox
Desert kit fox is protected as a fur-bearing mammal under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Chap. 5, §460) and may not be taken at any time. The MND lacks a discussion and analysis of potential impacts to desert kit fox. The Project site is located within predicted habitat for desert kit fox, as indicated in the Kit Fox Predicted Habitat dataset (CWHR M148 [ds2599]) accessed using CDFW’s BIOS.

Because desert kit fox has high fidelity to natal dens, it is crucial to adequately assess whether desert kit fox is present on the Project site well in advance of commencing Project activities. If desert kit fox is found on-site during breeding season, it could delay Project activities until appropriate vegetation and construction buffers can be established on the Project site.

Desert kit fixes also have the potential to move onto the Project site between the time that the general reconnaissance survey was conducted on July 18, 2022, and start of Project construction activities. Due to the Project being located within predicted habitat for desert kit fox, the lack of information on if and how surveys were conducted for the species, and the potential for this species to move on to the Project site prior to and during construction activities, CDFW considers the Project as having the potential to impact desert kit fox.

To support the City in reducing impacts to desert kit fox to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends the MND is revised to include an analysis of impacts to desert kit fox, including the findings from focused surveys for desert kit fox, and to incorporate appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures based on findings from surveys. CDFW also recommends the following mitigation measure is added to a revised and recirculated MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[D]: Desert Kit Fox
Item Number: 1.

Page 1431 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 13 ends

Preconstruction surveys for desert kit fox shall be conducted within 14 days prior to the start of construction. The survey area shall include the Project disturbance areas plus a 500-foot buffer during the breeding season (January 15 through August 31 or until pups are foraging on their own) and a 250-foot buffer outside the breeding season. Pre-construction surveys should include 100-percent visual coverage of the Project area and buffers. Potentially occupied burrows in Project disturbance areas and the survey buffer shall be mapped, and Qualified Biologist(s) shall utilize daily on-site monitoring, tracking stations, and wildlife cameras to determine whether the burrows are occupied. If a burrow is determined to be occupied by desert kit fox during the breeding season, the burrow shall be demarcated with a 500-foot buffer. If a burrow is determined to be occupied outside the breeding season it shall be demarcated with a 250-foot buffer. Burrows determined to be unoccupied shall be demarcated with a 50-foot buffer. No disturbance of active dens shall take place when juvenile desert kit fox may be present and dependent on parental care.
6) American badger
American badger is a California Species of Special Concern. Regarding American badger, page 43 of the Project’s Biological Assessment indicates that “suitable habitat for this species does not occur on site. As such, this species is considered absent from the Project site.” CDFW is concerned about the accuracy of the conclusion that site does not contain suitable habitat for American badger because the Project site is located within predicted habitat for American badger, as indicted in the American Badger Predicted Habitat dataset (CWHR M160 [ds2611]) accessed using CDFW’s BIOS. Also, the MND and supporting documents lack a discussion on if and how surveys specifically for American badger were conducted.

American badgers also have the potential to move onto the Project site between the time that the general reconnaissance survey was conducted on July 18, 2022, and start of Project construction activities. Due to the Project being located within predicted habitat for American badger, the lack of information on if and how surveys were conducted for American badger, and the potential for American badger to move on to the Project site prior to and during construction activities, CDFW considers the Project as having the potential to impact American badger.

To support the City in reducing impacts to American badger to a level less than significant, CDFW recommend the following mitigation measure is added to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[E]: American Badger
No more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities, a Qualified Biologist(s) shall conduct surveys to Item Number: 1.

Page 1432 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 14 ends

determine if potential American badger burrows are present in the Project area. If American badger burrows are located, the City of Desert Hot Springs and Project sponsor shall have a Qualified Biologist(s) monitor the burrows using observation and tracking material and/or trail cameras over a three (3) day period to determine the status of the burrow. If non-natal active dens can be avoided and buffered from Project activities, the biologist shall flag a minimum 100-foot disturbance-free buffer zone. A minimum 500-foot disturbance-free buffer shall be placed around the natal den and maintained until juvenile independence is determined by the biologist. The biologist shall block inactive dens within the work area or buffer zone that will not be directly impacted by Project activities with rocks and sticks to discourage use. The biologist shall periodically check and ensure the inactive burrows remain blocked and are not occupied. The biologist shall remove the obstructions when Project activities are complete. The biologist has the authority to halt or stop work if individuals exhibit signs of disturbance. Established buffers shall remain until the biologist determines the young have dispersed or the den is no longer active, or until Project activities cease. If American badger is proposed to be relocated from an active den or an active den will be impacted, an exclusion plan shall be prepared for CDFW review and approval that will be performed outside of breeding season and after juvenile dispersal.
7) Artificial Nighttime Lighting

Page 14 ends

driveways, pathways, and parking areas for safety and security purposes. The Proposed Project’s photometric plan will be submitted under a separate permit Application and will be required to comply with §17.40.170 of the Municipal Code. Per the City’s requirements, lighting must be fully or partially shielded in order to prevent glare and light spread beyond the site boundaries. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not generate a significant amount of light and glare when compared to the surrounding area. Less than significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.” The MND lacks additional information on artificial nighttime lighting. The Project includes operation 24 hours per day, seven days per week and is located adjacent to open-space areas on all sides—areas that provide suitable nesting, roosting, foraging, and refugia habitat for birds, migratory birds that fly at night, bats, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife. The Project’s proposed artificial nighttime lighting has the potential to significantly and adversely affect wildlife in the open-space areas adjacent to the Project site. Artificial lighting alters ecological processes including, but not limited to, the temporal niches of species; the repair and recovery of physiological function; the measurement of time through interference with the detection of circadian and lunar and seasonal cycles; the detection of resources and Item Number: 1.

Page 1433 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 15 ends

natural enemies; and navigation.
10 Many species use photoperiod cues for
communication (e.g., bird song11), determining when to begin foraging, 12 behavioral
thermoregulation,
13 and migration.14 Phototaxis, a phenomenon that results in attraction and movement towards light, can disorient, entrap, and temporarily blind wildlife species that experience it.
15 While plans for shielding artificial nighttime lighting support the Project in limiting lighting impacts to biological resources within areas surrounding the Project site, CDFW considers these minimization plans insufficient in scope and timing to reduce impacts to a level less than significant. To support the City in avoiding or reducing impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources to less than significant, CDFW recommends the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[F]: Artificial Nighttime Lighting Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of the Project, the City of Desert Hot Springs and Project proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active.

The City of Desert Hot Springs and Project proponent shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward and directed away from surrounding open-space and agricultural areas, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International DarkSky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City of Desert Hot Springs and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. 8) CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Program
Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires any person, state or local governmental agency, or public utility to notify CDFW prior to beginning any activity that may do one

10 Gatson, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T., Hopkins, J. 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews, 88.4: 912-927. 11 Miller, M. W. 2006. Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American robins. The Condor 108:130– 139.
12 Stone, E. L., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 2009. Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Current Biology 19:1123– 1127.
13 Beiswenger, R. E. 1977. Diet patterns of aggregative behavior in tadpoles of Bufo americanus, in relation to light and temperature. Ecology 58:98–108.
14 Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution - Review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:191–198.

Item Number: 1.

Page 1434 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 16 ends

or more of the following: divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream, or lake; change the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake; use material from any river, stream, or lake; or deposit or dispose of material into any river, stream, or lake.

Note that "any river, stream, or lake" includes those that are episodic (i.e., those that are dry for periods of time) as well as those that are perennial (i.e., those that flow yearround). This includes ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow.

Page 26 ends

visual coverage and no drainage features were present on-site that met the definition for WOUS. As such, the Project Site does not contain any wetlands, WOUS, or Waters of the State. The CDFW asserts jurisdiction over any drainage feature that contains a definable bed and bank or associated riparian vegetation. The Project Site was surveyed with 100 percent visual coverage and no definable bed or bank features exist on the Project Site. As such, the Project Site does not contain any areas under CDFW jurisdiction.” Based on review of historical aerial imagery using Google Earth, at least one ephemeral stream crosses the Project site moving from the northwest to southeast corners of the site. Evidence of erosion, scour, and stream-aligned vegetation is visible in aerial imagery over multiple years.

To ensure that impacts to streams and associated fish and wildlife are reduced to a level less than significant, CDFW recommends that the City add the following mitigation measure to a revised MND:

Mitigation Measure BIO-[G]: CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Program Prior to construction, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) stating that notification under section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor shall obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code section 1602 resources associated with the Project.
9) Landscaping

Page 50 ends

square-feet of irrigated landscaping.” The Project’s Landscape Plan in Figure 4 of the MND indicates that landscaping will comprise a mix of predominantly non-native shrubs and trees among cobble stone or decomposed granite. CDFW recommends that the MND include recommendations regarding landscaping from Section 4.0 of the CVMSHCP “Table 4-112: Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping” (pp. 4-180 to 4-182; https://cvmshcp.org/plan-documents/). CDFW also recommends incorporation of water-wise concepts in any Project landscape design plans. In particular, CDFW recommends xeriscaping with locally native California Item Number: 1.

Page 1435 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 17 ends

species and installing water-efficient and targeted irrigation systems (such as drip irrigation). Native plants support butterflies, birds, reptiles, amphibians, small mammals, bees, and other pollinators that evolved with those plants. More information on native plants suitable for the Project location and nearby nurseries is available at Calscape:
https://calscape.org/. Local water agencies/cities and resource conservation cities in your area may be able to provide information on plant nurseries that carry locally native species, and some facilities display drought-tolerant locally native species demonstration gardens. Information on drought-tolerant landscaping and water-efficient irrigation systems is available on California’s Save our Water website:
https://saveourwater.com/.

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link: https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals.

ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES
The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.)

CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts to biological resources. CDFW concludes that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts to biological resources. CDFW also concludes that the MND lacks sufficient information for a meaningful review of impacts to biological resources. CDFW recommends that a revised MND, including a complete assessment of biological resources (assessment of special-status plants, burrowing owl, and desert kit fox) be recirculated for public comment. The CEQA Guidelines indicate that recirculation is required when a new significant effect is identified and additional mitigation measures Item Number: 1.

Page 1436 of 2517 ends

Patricia Villagomez, Principal Planner
City of Desert Hot Springs
September 13, 2024

Page 18 ends

are necessary (§ 15073.5(b)(1)). CDFW also recommends that revised and additional mitigation measures and analysis as described in this letter be added to a revised MND.

CDFW personnel are available for consultation regarding biological resources and strategies to avoid and minimize impacts. Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Jacob Skaggs, Senior Environmental Scientist Specialist, at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Kim Freeburn
Environmental Program Manager
Attachment 1: MMRP for CDFW-Proposed Mitigation Measures ec:

Heather Brashear, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor), CDFW [email protected]
Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Sacramento [email protected]
ATTACHMENT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Mitigation Measures Timing and
Methods
Responsible
Parties
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nesting Birds
Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys
shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no
more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or
ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction
surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect
evidence of nesting, including nest locations and
nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will
make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as
a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active
nests are found during the pre-construction nesting
bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an
Timing: No more
than 3 days prior
to vegetation
removal or
ground-disturbing
activities.

Methods: See
Mitigation
Measure
Implementation:

City of Desert Hot
Springs and Project
proponent
Monitoring and
Reporting: City of
Desert Hot Springs
Item Number: 1.

Page 1437 of 2517 ends

Desert Hot Springs City CouncilDecember 12, 2024

Desert Hot Springs City Council
December 12, 2024