X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 268
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 3
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
A2. Does the plan
document an
opportunity for
neighboring
communities, local and
regional agencies
involved in hazard
mitigation activities,
agencies that have the
authority to regulate
development as well as
other interests to be
involved in the planning
process? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(2))
a. Does the plan
document an
opportunity for
neighboring
communities, local,
and regional agencies
involved in hazard
mitigation activities,
agencies that have
the authority to
regulate
development, as well
as other interested
parties to be involved
in the planning
process?
Section 3, Pages 19-20
X
b. Does the plan
identify how the
stakeholders were
invited to participate
in the process?
Section 3, Pages 16-17
X
A3. Does the plan
document how the
public was involved in
the planning process
during the drafting
stage? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(1))
a. Does the plan
document how the
public was given the
opportunity to be
involved in the
planning process?
Section 3, Pages 19-20
Appendix D. – Public Engagement
X
b. Does the plan
document how the
public’s feedback was
incorporated into the
plan?
Section 3, Pages 19-20
Appendix D. – Public Engagement
X
A4. Does the plan describe the review and
incorporation of existing plans, studies, reports,
and technical information? (Requirement
§201.6(b)(3))
Section 3, Pages 21,
Section 7, Page 122
X
A5. Is there discussion of how the
community(ies) will continue public
participation in the plan maintenance process?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(iii))
Section 7, Pages 114-115
X
A6. Is there a
description of the
method and schedule
for keeping the plan
current (monitoring,
evaluating and
updating the mitigation
a. Does the plan
identify how, when,
and by whom the
plan will be
monitored (how will
implementation be
tracked) over time?
Section 7, Pages 110-115
Section 3, p.19, City Manager or representative
X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 269
4 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
plan within a 5-year
cycle)? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(i))
b. Does the plan
identify how, when,
and by whom the
plan will be
evaluated (assessing
the effectiveness of
the plan at achieving
stated purpose and
goals) over time?
Section 7, Pages 110-115
X
c. Does the plan
identify how, when,
and by whom the
plan will be updated
during the 5-year
cycle?
Section 7, Pages 110-115
X
ELEMENT A: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT B. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
(Reviewer: See Section 4 for assistance with Element B) B1. Does the plan
include a description of
the type, location, and
extent of all-natural
hazards that can affect
each jurisdiction(s)?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(2)(i))
a. Does the plan
include a general
description of allnatural hazards that
can affect each
jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages 24-30
Section 4, p.25-28, Table 10 & 11
X
b. Does the plan
provide rationale for
the omission of any
natural hazards that
are commonly
recognized to affect
the jurisdiction(s) in
the planning area?
Section 4, Pages 24-30
Section 4, p.25-27, Table 10. Rationale for
including/excluding hazards clear from table
X
c. Does the plan
include a description
of the type of allnatural hazards that
can affect each
jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages:
30-31
36-38
44-45
48 52-53
56 60-61
66 73-74
78-79
X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 270
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 5
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
d. Does the plan
include a description
of the location for
all-natural hazards
that can affect each
jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages
31-32
38-41
45 48
53-54
56-58
61-62
66-76
74-75
79-81
X
e. Does the plan
include a description
of the extent for allnatural hazards that
can affect each
jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages
31-32
38-41
45 48
53-54
56-58
61-62
66-76
74-75
79-81
X
B2. Does the plan
include information on
previous occurrences of
hazard events and on
the probability of
future hazard events
for each jurisdiction?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(2)(i))
a. Does the plan
include information
on previous
occurrences of
hazard events for
each jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages
32-33
41-42
45-46
51 54
58-59
62-63
70-71
75-76
X
b. Does the plan
include information
on the probability of
future hazard events
for each jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages
29 34
46 51
54 59
63 71
76 81
X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 271
6 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
B3. Is there a
description of each
identified hazard’s
impact on the
community as well as
an overall summary of
the community’s
vulnerability for each
jurisdiction?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(2)(ii))
a. Is there a
description of each
hazard’s impacts on
each jurisdiction
(what happens to
structures,
infrastructure,
people, environment,
etc.)?
Section 4, Pages
34-36
42-44
48-50
53-54
61-63
69-71
74-76
79-81
81-84
X
b. Is there a
description of each
identified hazard’s
overall vulnerability
(structures, systems,
populations, or other
community assets
defined by the
community that are
identified as being
susceptible to
damage and loss
from hazard events)
for each jurisdiction?
Section 4, Pages
29 34-36
46-47
51-52
54-56
59-60
63-66
71-73
76-77
81-83
X
B4. Does the plan address NFIP insured
structures within the jurisdiction that have been
repetitively damaged by floods? (Requirement
§201.6(c)(2)(ii))
Section 4, Pages 48
Section 5
Pages 91-92 X
ELEMENT B: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT C. MITIGATION STRATEGY
C1. Does the plan
document each
jurisdiction’s existing
authorities, policies,
programs and
resources and its ability
to expand on and
a. Does the plan
document each
jurisdiction’s existing
authorities, policies,
programs and
resources?
Section 5, Pages 85-92
Planning Admin Financial Outreach
X X X X
5.0 Page.85
5.0 Pages.88-
90 6.0
Pages.91
6.0 Pages
93-94
X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 272
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 7
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
improve these existing
policies and programs?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3))
b. Does the plan
document each
jurisdiction’s ability
to expand on and
improve these
existing policies and
programs?
Section 5, Pages 85-92
Planning Admin Financial Outreach
X X X X
6.0 Page.97
6.0 Page.97
6.0 Page. 97
6.0
X
C2. Does the plan address each jurisdiction’s
participation in the NFIP and continued
compliance with NFIP requirements, as
appropriate? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(ii))
Section 5, Pages 91-92
X
C3. Does the plan include goals to reduce/avoid
long-term vulnerabilities to the identified
hazards? (Requirement §201.6(c)(3)(i))
Section 6, Pages93-95
X
C4. Does the plan
identify and analyze a
comprehensive range
of specific mitigation
actions and projects for
each jurisdiction being
considered to reduce
the effects of hazards,
with emphasis on new
and existing buildings
and infrastructure?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(ii))
a. Does the plan
identify and analyze a
comprehensive range
of specific mitigation
actions and projects
to reduce the
impacts from
hazards?
Section 6, Pages 96-97
X
b. Does the plan
identify mitigation
actions for every
hazard posing a
threat to each
participating
jurisdiction?
Section 6, Pages 99-109
X
c. Do the identified
mitigation actions
and projects have an
emphasis on new and
existing buildings and
infrastructure?
Section 6, Pages 99-110
X
C5. Does the plan
contain an action plan
that describes how the
actions identified will
be prioritized (including
cost benefit review),
a. Does the plan
explain how the
mitigation actions
will be prioritized
(including cost
benefit review)?
Section 6, Pages 99-110
X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 273
8 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
implemented, and
administered by each
jurisdiction?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(iv));
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(3)(iii))
b. Does the plan
identify the position,
office, department,
or agency responsible
for implementing and
administering the
action, potential
funding sources and
expected timeframes
for completion?
Section 6, Pages 99-110
X
C6. Does the plan
describe a process by
which local
governments will
integrate the
requirements of the
mitigation plan into
other planning
mechanisms, such as
comprehensive or
capital improvement
plans, when
appropriate?
(Requirement
§201.6(c)(4)(ii))
a. Does the plan
identify the local
planning mechanisms
where hazard
mitigation
information and/or
actions may be
incorporated?
Section 6, Page 97
Section 3, p.21
X
b. Does the plan
describe each
community’s process
to integrate the data,
information, and
hazard mitigation
goals and actions into
other planning
mechanisms?
Section 6, Page 97
Section 6. Pages 97
X
c. The updated plan
must explain how the
jurisdiction(s)
incorporated the
mitigation plan,
when appropriate,
into other planning
mechanisms as a
demonstration of
progress in local
hazard mitigation
efforts.
Section 6, 97-110
X
ELEMENT C: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT D. PLAN REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION
(Applicable to plan updates only)
D1. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in
development? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section 2, Pages 12-14
Section 4, p.43, 63, 71, 75 X
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 274
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 9
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
D2. Was the plan revised to reflect progress in
local mitigation efforts? (Requirement
§201.6(d)(3))
Section 6, Pages 101-105
Section 3, p.27 X
D3. Was the plan revised to reflect changes in
priorities? (Requirement §201.6(d)(3))
Section 6, Pages 95-96
X
ELEMENT D: REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT E. PLAN ADOPTION
E1. Does the plan include documentation that
the plan has been formally adopted by the
governing body of the jurisdiction requesting
approval? (Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
(Pending Adoption)
X
E2. For multi-jurisdictional plans, has each
jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan
documented formal plan adoption?
(Requirement §201.6(c)(5))
N/A
ELEMENT E: REQUIRED REVISIONS
E1. Once granted APA status, the plan must be formally adopted by the local jurisdiction within 12-months.
Upon receipt of the formal adoption documentation, FEMA will approve the plan and the jurisdiction will be eligible for designated pre-disaster mitigation grant opportunities.
OPTIONAL: HIGH HAZARD POTENTIAL DAM RISKS (Applicable to jurisdictions interested in becoming sub applicants to FEMA’s Rehabilitation of High Hazard Potential Dams (HHPD) Grant Program only) HHPD1. Did Element A4 (planning process)
describe the incorporation of existing plans,
studies, reports, and technical information for
high hazard potential dams?
NA
HHPD2. Did Element B3 (risk assessment)
address HHPDs?
NA
HHPD3. Did Element C3 (mitigation goals)
include mitigation goals to reduce long-term
vulnerabilities from high hazard potential dams
that pose an unacceptable risk to the public?
NA
HHPD4. Did Element C4-C5 (mitigation actions)
address HHPDs prioritize mitigation actions to
reduce vulnerabilities from high hazard
potential dams that pose an unacceptable risk
to the public?
NA
REQUIRED REVISIONS
ELEMENT F. ADDITIONAL STATE REQUIREMENTS
(Optional for State Reviewers only; not to be completed by FEMA)
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 275
10 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
1. REGULATION CHECKLIST
Regulation (44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation
Plans)
Location in Plan
(section and/or
page number)
Met Not
Met
F1. NA
F2. NA
ELEMENT F: REQUIRED REVISIONS
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 276
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 11 SECTION 2:
PLAN ASSESSMENT
A. Plan Strengths and Opportunities for Improvement
This section provides a discussion of the strengths of the plan document and identifies areas where these could be improved beyond minimum requirements.
Element A: Planning Process
Opportunities for Improvement:
1) While there was a brief mention that neighboring jurisdictions were given the opportunity to participate (ref. p.20), it was unclear which jurisdictions were invited, when, how, and who their representative was. Given the overlapping location and extent of hazards, as well as the benefits of pursuing joint mitigation actions, we strongly encourage jurisdictions to strengthen partnerships with neighboring jurisdictions to advance mutually beneficial actions.
2) In future updates, consider expanding planning committee participants to include community planners, economic development, and elected officials. These officials often have direct involvement in areas which are key to integrating the LHMP with local decisionmaking processes. While not always possible, LHMPs and mitigation actions are strengthened when local elected officials are involved in the planning process.
Element B: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Strengths:
1) Great use of the ‘community lifelines’ framework to discuss areas of vulnerability for each hazard.
2) Good use of HAZUS-MH to estimate potential losses from catastrophic earthquakes.
Consider incorporating a finer-scale analysis of building inventories (to include residential structures) to determine and map potential damages and mitigation actions based on building types. This in-turn aids the evaluation of possible emergency response needs and actions.
Opportunities for Improvement:
1) Consider exploring and including data sources that break-down hazards, impacts (including past losses), and risk at the local level. Consider the use of data at the county or census tract level (ref. Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database – SHELDUS; FEMA’s National Risk Index) in future updates.
2) Consider a finer detail analysis of community exposure and vulnerability to each hazard.
For instance, in addition to mapping areas of wildfire risk and identifying the number/cost of buildings exposed, consider a table/matrix and map identifying the number of residents
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 277
12 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
exposed, number/location of vulnerable populations, type/location of fire-prone vegetation, building densities, etc. These quantitative measures, in conjunction with a qualitative assessment, would aid in the development and prioritization of mitigation actions.
3) Categories of severe weather that are distinct phenomena (e.g. extreme heat, freeze, or storms by type) always need to be profiled out separately if they are high priority or have a mitigation action identified
Element C: Mitigation Strategy
Strengths:
1) Clear understanding and consideration of the range of potential mitigation actions. 2) Good to see the use building codes updates as a key mitigation action across multiple hazards. Consider including land-use zoning changes and other planning-related activities as part of the mitigation strategy in future update. Many of these alternative planningrelated activities are also eligible for federal funding.
Opportunities for Improvement:
1) Connecting mitigation actions to the plan’s goals and objectives. Consider directly identifying the ways in which the individual mitigation actions further progress towards the plan’s goals and objectives. The use of pre-identified metrics would help track progress towards goal attainment and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation actions. 2) It is strongly encouraged to use ‘problem statements’ in developing mitigation goals, objectives, actions, and/or strategies. Problem statements are succinct summaries of a community’s vulnerabilities to a given hazard and may include the known or suggested causes or contributing factors to vulnerability. These plain language problem statements can then be used to organize and craft plan goals and subsequent objectives, actions, or strategies (for reference, see California Adaptation Planning Guide, 2020, CalOES). 3) Many of the proposed actions aren’t directly related to risk reduction or hazard mitigation, but rather address emergency preparedness and response actions. Although a mitigation action for each high-priority hazard was provided, meeting review criteria, in future updates, please consider the range of actions that will reduce or avoid future losses for each the plan’s identified hazards.
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 278
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 13 Element D: Plan Update, Evaluation, and Implementation (Plan Updates Only) Strengths:
1) Excellent use of ‘Table 45: Method and Schedule for Maintaining and Updating Mitigation Plan’ to describe how Diamond Bar intends to maintain the plan and prepare for future updates ahead of the 5-year expiration point.
Opportunities for Improvement:
1) Recommend considering the sources of data available to assess hazards and mitigation actions throughout the 5-year period. Qualitative assessments are useful and can leverage the expertise and experience of city staff, but quantitative sources of data may help identify patterns and trends in hazards and vulnerabilities affecting the planning area. 2) Consider identifying a specific person/position responsible for monitoring plan and mitigation action outcomes. While the City Manager’s office is identified, it often advantageous to appoint a specific person/position to monitor the plan and integrate mitigation actions with existing city resources and planning mechanisms.
B. Resources for Implementing and Updating Your Approved Plan This resource section is organized into three categories:
1) Guidance and Resources
2) Training Topics and Courses
3) Funding Sources
Guidance and Resources
Local Mitigation Planning Handbook
https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/31598 Beyond the Basics
http://mitigationguide.org/
Mitigation Ideas
https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/30627 Plan Integration: Linking Local Planning Efforts
https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/108893 Integrating Disaster Data into Hazard Mitigation Planning https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/103486 Integrating Historic Property and Cultural Resource Considerations into Hazard Mitigation Planning
https://www.fema.gov/ar/media-library/assets/documents/4317 Community Rating System User Manual
https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/8768
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 279
14 FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
U.S. Climate Resilient Toolkit
https://toolkit.climate.gov/
2014 National Climate Assessment
http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/
Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation http://ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX/images/uploads/SREX-All_FINAL.pdf FY15 Hazard Mitigation Assistance Unified Guidance
https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/103279 Climate Resilient Mitigation Activities for Hazard Mitigation Assistance https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/110202 Training
More information at https://training.fema.gov/emi.aspx or through your State Training Officer Mitigation Planning
IS-318 Mitigation Planning for Local and Tribal Communities https://training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=is-318 IS-393 Introduction to Hazard Mitigation
https://training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=is-393.a G-318 Preparing and Reviewing Local Plans
G-393 Mitigation for Emergency Managers
Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Grant Programs
IS-212.b Introduction to Unified HMA
http://www.training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=IS-212.b IS-277 Benefit Cost Analysis Entry Level
http://www.training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=IS-277 E-212 HMA: Developing Quality Application Elements
E-213 HMA: Application Review and Evaluation
E-214 HMA: Project Implementation and Programmatic Closeout E-276 Benefit-Cost Analysis Entry Level
GIS and Hazus-MH
IS-922 Application of GIS for Emergency Management
http://www.training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=IS-922 E-190 ArcGIS for Emergency Managers
E-296 Application of Hazus-MH for Risk Assessment
E-313 Basic Hazus-MH
Floodplain Management
E-273 Managing Floodplain Development through the NFIP
E-278 National Flood Insurance Program/ Community Rating System Potential Funding Sources
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
POC: FEMA Region IX and State Hazard Mitigation Officer Website: https://www.fema.gov/hazard-mitigation-grant-program Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 280
FEMA Region IX Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Review Tool 15 POC: FEMA Region IX and State Hazard Mitigation Officer Website: https://www.fema.gov/pre-disaster-mitigation-grant-program Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program
POC: FEMA Region IX and State Hazard Mitigation Officer Website: https://www.fema.gov/flood-mitigation-assistance-grant-program Emergency Management Performance Grant Program
POC: FEMA Region IX
Website: https://www.fema.gov/emergency-management-performance-grant-program
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 281
16 FEMA RIX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
SECTION 3:
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL SUMMARY SHEET
INSTRUCTIONS: For multi-jurisdictional plans, this summary sheet must be completed by listing each participating jurisdiction that is eligible to adopt the plan.
MULTI-JURISDICTION SUMMARY SHEET
# Jurisdiction Name Jurisdiction Type
Eligible to
Adopt the
Plan?
Plan POC Email
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 6.1.d
Packet Pg. 282
FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 17
SECTION 4:
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX (OPTIONAL) INSTRUCTIONS: This matrix can be used by the plan reviewer to help identify if all of the components of Element B have been met.
List out natural hazard names that are identified in the plan in the column labeled “Hazards” and put a “Y” or “N” for each component of Element B.
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 283
FEMA Region IX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool 18
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
Hazard
Requirement Met? (Y/N)
Type Location Extent Previous
Occurrences Probability Impacts Vulnerability
Mitigation
Action
Drought
Moderate Section
4.Pages 28,
31-32
Section
4.Pages 31-32
Section
4.Pages 32-33
3 Section
4.Pages 34-
36 9 Section 6.0
Pages 104
Earthquake
High Section
4.Pages 28,
38-41
Section
4.Pages 38-41
Section
4.Pages 41-42
2; p.42 Section
4.Pages 42-
44 17; p.90 Section 6.0
Pages 104
Flood
Low Section
4.Pages 28,
45-47
Section
4.Pages 45-47
Section 4.Page
48 1 Section
4.Pages 48-
50 10 Section 6.0
Pages 105-
106
Landslides
Low Section
4.Pages 28,
50-52
Section
4.Pages 50-52
Section
4.Pages 52-53
1 Section
4.Pages 53-
54 9 Section 6.0
Pages 104-
109
Severe Storm
(Extreme Heat,
Thunderstorm,
Tornado and High
Wind)
Moderate
Heat: 51
Winds: 67-
68 Rain: 60
Section
4.Pages 28,
57-58
Heat: 52
Winds: 68
Rain: 60
Section
4.Pages 57-58
Heat: 52
Winds: 68
Rain: 61
Section
4.Pages 58-60
Heat: 53
Winds: 69
Rain: 61
5 Heat: 53
Winds: 70
Rain: 61
Section
4.Pages 61-
63 Heat: 53-
54 Winds: 71-
73 Rain: 61
6 Heat: 53-
54 Winds: 71-
73 Rain: 61-
63 Section 6.0
Pages 104
Heat: 106
Winds: 104,
106
Rain: 107
Wildfire
High Section
4.Pages 28,
64-68
Section
4.Pages 64-68
Section
4.Pages 68-69
5; p.69 Section
4.Pages 69-
71 12; p.92 Section 6.0
Pages 105-
106,107
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 284
19 FEMA RIX Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX
Hazard
Requirement Met? (Y/N)
Type Location Extent Previous
Occurrences Probability Impacts Vulnerability
Mitigation
Action
Hazardous Materials
Moderate Section
4.Pages 28,
72-73
Section
4.Pages 72-73
Section
4.Pages 73-74
2 Section
4.Pages 74-
76 9 Section 6.0
Pages 105
Human Infectious
Disease
Moderate Section
4.Pages 28,
77-79
Section
4.Pages 77-79
No previous
Occurrence
2 Section
4.Pages 79-
81 8 Section 6.0
Pages 105
Notes:
Natural Hazard - * Hazard considered under CFR (Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(i)) Low-Mod Priority
Natural Hazard
Hazard(s) considered low-mod priority, but which have a mitigation action identified. Requires full profile for each hazard.
High Priority Natural
Hazard
Hazard(s) considered high priority and must have a mitigation action identified. Requires full hazard profile.
6.1.d
Packet Pg. 285