Minutes — Dinuba City Council, September 13, 2022 (part 2 of 3)

RESOLUTION NO 2022-51

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF DINUBA

COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA ADOPTING A “MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION” AS THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR THE

MONTEBELLA PROJECT (ANNEXATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE

AND TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP)
WHEREAS, an application was submitted to annex four parcels generally located along the west side of Englehart Avenue north of the Saginaw Avenue alignment, along with a General Plan Amendment, zone change (prezoning) and a Tentative Subdivision Map. The Assessor Parcel Numbers of the site include 012-272-011, 012-272-012, 012- 272-013, and 012-272-014, and
WHEREAS, the specific project actions include:
• Annexation (reorganization) of the subject parcels into the City of Dinuba and detachment from County Service Area No. 1 and the Kings River Conservation District.
• A General Plan Amendment to shift an existing land use designation for “Park/Ponding Basin” from the northwest corner of the site to the southwest corner.
• A zone change to prezone APN 012-272-013 to the R-1-6 (PUD) and RCO zone and to prezone the remaining three parcels being annexed to the R1-7.5 zone. • A tentative subdivision map to subdivide the site into 100 single family residential lots. With application of the PUD zone, 23 of the lots are smaller than the required 6,000 square foot lot size required by the R-1-6 zone.

WHEREAS, the planning actions are considered a “project” under the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and accordingly, an Initial Environmental Study was prepared, consistent with CEQA, and WHEREAS, the Initial Environmental Study determined that the proposed project would not result in significant impacts to the environment, and Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-51
(Montebella Phase 2/3)

Page 2 of 5 ends

WHEREAS, the Planning Department has prepared a staff report on the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, after considering all the evidence presented, determined the following findings were relevant in evaluating this action:

1. The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Dinuba General Plan and the Dinuba Zoning Ordinance, as amended.

2. The City of Dinuba has prepared an Initial Environmental Study, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. The study determined the project will not have significant impacts on the environment provided that mitigation measures (listed in Attachment “A”) are implemented. Accordingly, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.

3. The proposed action will not have an adverse impact on the health, safety and welfare of residents in the neighborhood or community NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Initial Environmental Study prepared for the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration are hereby adopted by the Dinuba City Council.

The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Council member __________________, second by Council member ________________, at a regular meeting of the Dinuba City Council on the 13th day of September, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Linda Launer, Mayor of the City of Dinuba
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Maria Ananiz, City Clerk
Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-51
(Montebella Phase 2/3)

Page 3 of 5 ends

Attachment “A”
Mitigation Measures
Air Quality
AIR - 1) Before a construction permit is issued for the proposed Project, the project applicant, project sponsor, or construction contractor shall submit construction emissions minimization plans to the City of Dinuba for review and approval. The construction emissions minimization plans shall provide reasonably detailed compliance with the following requirements:

Where portable diesel engines are used during construction, all off-road equipment with engines greater than 50 horsepower shall have engines that meet either EPA or CARB Tier 4 Final off-road emission standards except as otherwise specified herein.

If engines that comply with Tier 4 Final off-road emission standards are not commercially available, then the construction contractor shall use the next cleanest piece of off-road equipment (e.g., Tier 4 Interim) that is commercially available. For purposes of this project design feature, “commercially available” shall mean the equipment at issue is available taking into consideration factors such as (i) criticalpath timing of construction; and (ii) geographic proximity to the project site of equipment. If the relevant equipment is determined by the project applicant to not be commercially available, the contractor can confirm this conclusion by providing letters from at least two rental companies for each piece of off-road equipment that is at issue.

Biological Resources
BIO - 1) To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August.

BIO - 2) If it is not possible to schedule construction between September and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests will be disturbed during Project implementation. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact area for nests. If an active nest is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the nest. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-51
(Montebella Phase 2/3)

Page 4 of 5 ends

fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.

Cultural Resources
CUL – 1 Should evidence of prehistoric archeological resources be discovered during construction, the contractor shall halt all work within 25 feet of the find and the resource shall be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If evidence of any archaeological, cultural, and/or historical deposits is found, hand excavation and/or mechanical excavation shall proceed to evaluate the deposits for determination of significance as defined by the CEQA guidelines. The archaeologist shall submit reports, to the satisfaction of the City of Dinuba, describing the testing program and subsequent results. These reports shall identify any program mitigation that the project proponent shall complete in order to mitigate archaeological impacts (including resource recovery and/or avoidance testing and analysis, removal, reburial, and curation of archaeological resources).

CUL – 2 In order to ensure that the proposed project does not impact buried human remains during construction, the project proponent shall be responsible for on-going monitoring of project construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the project proponent shall provide the City of Dinuba with documentation identifying construction personnel that will be responsible for on-site monitoring. If buried human remains are encountered during construction, further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall be halted until the Tulare County coroner is contacted and the coroner has made the determinations and notifications required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. If the coroner determines that Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) require that he give notice to the Native American Heritage Commission, then such notice shall be given within 24 hours, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c). In that event, the NAHC will conduct the notifications required by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Until the consultations described below have been completed, the landowner shall further ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices where Native American human remains are located, is not disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the Most Likely Descendants on all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences and treatments, as prescribed by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b). The NAHC will mediate any disputes regarding treatment of remains in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.94(k). The landowner shall be entitled to exercise rights established by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(e) if any of the circumstances established by that provision become applicable.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-51
(Montebella Phase 2/3)

Page 5 of 5 ends

Transportation/Circulation
TRA-1 The Tulare County guidelines include detailed instructions for mitigation if a projecthas significant impacts. The guidelines state “The preferred method of VMT mitigation in Tulare County is for project applicants to provide transportation improvements that facilitate travel by walking, bicycling, or transit.” In accordance with these guidelines, a survey was conducted within a half mile of the Project to determine any pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities deficiencies exist. After review, there were existing curb returns which do not meet current ADA requirements for ramps. The identified improvements include the following:
• East side of Adelaide Way & Englehart Avenue (2 ramps) • East side of Kelly Drive & Englehart Avenue (2 ramps) • South side of Kelly Drive & Morningside Drive (2 ramps) • North side of Kelly Drive & Morningside Drive (2 ramps) Total project cost is estimated at approximately $24,000 with a 20 percent contingency.

The guidelines include a minimum cost for mitigation of $20 per daily trip generated by the project. The project is anticipated to generate 1055 daily trips, which equates to a target value of improvements of $21,100. At the time of construction should prices fluctuate, an adjustment in the scope of improvements may need to be made. -1-
ATTACHMENT “B”
RESOLUTION 2022-52

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF DINUBA,

COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA INITIATING A REORGANIZATION FOR FOUR PARCELS CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 38.8± ACRES, LOCATED

ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENGLEHART AVENUE NORTH OF THE SAGINAW AVENUE ALIGNMENT WHEREAS, an application for reorganization, consistent with regulations contained in Government Code Section 56000 (the Knox-Cortese-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000) was filed by the City of Dinuba for four existing parcels, and WHEREAS, the subject territory is located along the west side of Englehart Avenue (Road 72) and the north side of the Saginaw Avenue alignment, and WHEREAS, the parcels contain approximately 38.8± acres and includes agricultural land.

The Assessor Parcel Numbers are 272-011, 012-272-012, 012-272-013, and 012-272-014, and WHEREAS, the City of Dinuba, designated as the conducting agency, wishes to reorganize said properties because they are proposed for development of a new single family residential subdivision with a neighborhood park and storm water basin. Further the parcels are within Dinuba’s Sphere of Influence, are bounded on two sides by the Dinuba city limits, are designated for urban uses by the Dinuba General Plan, and have access to Dinuba’s utility systems, and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared the necessary investigations and reports for this annexation, and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an environmental analysis for the project, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) which determined the project will not have significant impacts (provided that mitigation measures are implemented, and WHEREAS, the City of Dinuba wishes to submit a formal application for reorganization to the Tulare Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for territory shown in Exhibit 1 hereinafter called the “Montebella Phase 2/3 reorganization”, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-52
Reorganization for Montebella Phase 2/3
-2-

1. Application is hereby made to the Executive Officer of the Tulare County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) consistent with the information contained in the attached questionnaire, entitled Reorganization 2022-01 (Montebella Phase 2/3 to annex the subject parcels into the City of Dinuba and detach the parcels from Tulare County’s County Service Area #1 (CSA#1) and the Kings River Conservation District.

2. The City has determined the project will not have significant impacts on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been adopted, consistent with the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

3. The subject parcels have been pre-zoned R-1-6 (PUD) (Single Family Residential (Planned Unit Development), RCO (Resource Conservation) and R-1-7.5 (Single Family Residential) by the City of Dinuba.

4. The City Clerk of the City of Dinuba is hereby authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Executive Officer of the Tulare County Local Agency Formation Commission.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-52
Reorganization for Montebella Phase 2/3
-3-
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Reorganization 2022-01, as shown in Exhibit 1, is hereby approved by the Dinuba City Council.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Saginaw Ave.
north
ATTACHMENT “C”

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO 2022-53

BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF DINUBA

COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA APPROVING

A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO AN ANNEXATION AND TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (MONTEBELLA).

WHEREAS, an application was submitted to annex four parcels generally located along the west side of Englehart Avenue north of the Saginaw Way alignment, along with a General Plan Amendment, zone change (prezoning) and a Tentative Subdivision Map. The Assessor Parcel Numbers of the site include 012-272-011, 012-272-012, 012- 272-013, and 012-272-014, and
WHEREAS, the specific project actions include:
• Annexation (reorganization) of the subject parcels into the City of Dinuba and detachment from County Service Area No. 1 and the Kings River Conservation District.
• A General Plan Amendment to shift an existing land use designation for “Park/Ponding Basin” from the northwest corner of the site to the southwest corner.
• A zone change to prezone APN 012-272-013 to the R-1-6 (PUD) and RCO zone and to prezone the remaining three parcels being annexed to the R1-7.5 zone. • A tentative subdivision map to subdivide the site into 100 single family residential lots and a neighborhood park. With application of the PUD zone, 23 of the lots are smaller than the required 6,000 square foot lot size required by the R-1-6 zone.

WHEREAS, property owners within 300 feet and occupants within 100 feet of the subject parcels were notified of the City Council’s meeting and a public hearing notice was published ten (10) days prior to the City Council’s meeting, and WHEREAS, the Planning Department has prepared a staff report and environmental finding, and
Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-53
General Plan Amendment for Montebella Annexation Site

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this action and accepted testimony.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, after considering all the evidence presented, determined the following findings were relevant in evaluating these actions:

1. The proposed actions are consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Dinuba General Plan.

2. The City has determined the project will have no significant impacts on the environment provided that mitigation measures are implemented, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for adoption, consistent with of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

3. The proposed actions will not have an adverse impact on the health, safety and welfare of residents in the neighborhood or community.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the General Plan Amendment (as shown in attached Exhibit 1) is approved by the Dinuba City Council.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 3 of 3 ends

Exhibit 1: Proposed General Plan Amendment
Proposed General Plan
Designation:
“Park/Ponding Basin”
north
Englehart Ave.

Existing city limit boundary
ATTACHMENT “D”
1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-11

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA AMENDING THE ZONING OF

FOUR PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENGLEHART AVENUE, NORTH OF SAGINAW AVENUE.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA HEREBY DOES ORDAIN:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
(a) The City of Dinuba administers a Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Dinuba Municipal Code), including a map that designates all parcels of land with specific zoning classifications.
(b) The purpose of zoning is to facilitate a well-planned City and to avoid land use conflicts, among other objectives.
(c) The City has received an application to annex four parcels on the west side of Englehart Avenue and the north side of the Saginaw Avenue alignment. The parcels are proposed to be designated with several zones as shown on Exhibit 1 (attached) including R-1-6 (PUD), RCO and R-1-7.5.
(d) The Assessor Parcel Numbers of the subject parcels are 272-011, 012-272-012, 012- 272-013, and 012-272-014.
(e) The purpose of the zone change is to facilitate annexation of the site, development of a residential subdivision and continued residential use of existing-developed parcels on the site.
(f) The proposed zone change is shown on Exhibit 1.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY.

Each of the provisions of this ordinance is severable from all other provisions. If any article, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published by one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least five (5) days prior to adoption and again fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the City of Dinuba
Ordinance 2022-11 (Montebella Phase 2/3)
2 Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 5. The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dinuba on the 13th day of September, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________________
Linda Launer, Mayor of the City of Dinuba
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Maria Ananiz, City Clerk
City of Dinuba
Ordinance 2022-11 (Montebella Phase 2/3)
3 EXHIBIT 1
north
Englehart Ave.

Existing city limit boundary
“R-1-7.5”
“RCO”
“R-1-6 (PUD)”
ATTACHMENT “E”

Page 1 of 15 ends

RESOLUTION NO 2022-54

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF DINUBA

COUNTY OF TULARE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA APPROVING AN

APPLICATION FOR A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY HOMES) TO CREATE 102 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, AND A NEIGHBORHOOD

PARK/TEMPORARY STORMWATER PONDING BASIN
WHEREAS, an application was submitted to subdivide an existing parcel containing approximately 28.8 acres into 102 single family residential lots and a 4.5 acre neighborhood park/ponding basin generally located along the west side of Englehart Avenue and north of the Saginaw Way alignment. The Assessor Parcel Number of the subject parcel is 012-272-013, and
WHEREAS, the specific project actions include:
• Annexation (reorganization) of the the site and three adjacent parcels into the City of Dinuba and detachment from County Service Area No. 1 and the Kings River Conservation District
• A General Plan Amendment to shift an existing land use designation for “Park/Ponding Basin” from the northwest corner of the site to the southwest corner.
• A zone change to prezone the parcel to the R-1-6 (PUD) and RCO zone. • A tentative subdivision map to subdivide the site into 100 single family residential lots. With application of the PUD zone, 23 of the lots are smaller than the required 6,000 square foot lot size required by the R-1-6 zone.

WHEREAS, the Dinuba Municipal Code requires the Planning Commission and City Council be able to make findings that the design of the subdivision is superior to that which could be achieved with using simply the base (R-1-6 zone) zone standards, and
WHEREAS, in order to assist with making the required findings that the design is superior, the City is requiring design upgrades for the project, including parkways with street trees, a neighborhood park, pedestrian-scale street lamps and a requirement that no two adjacent homes have the same design, and
Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 2 of 15 ends

WHEREAS, property owners within 300 feet and occupants within 100 feet of the subject parcels were notified of the City Council’s meeting and a public hearing notice was published ten (10) days prior to the City Council’s meeting, and WHEREAS, the Planning Department has prepared a staff report and environmental finding, and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on this action and accepted testimony.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, after considering all the evidence presented, determined the following findings were relevant in evaluating this request:

1. The proposed Tentative Subvdivision Map is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Dinuba General Plan.

3. The proposed project will not have an adverse impact on the health, safety and welfare of residents in the neighborhood or community.

4. The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is superior in design compared to what could be achieved by utilizing the standards of the base R-1-6 zone.

4. The Tentative Subdivision Map (shown in Exhibit “A” (and on file with the Dinuba Public Works Department)) is subject to conditions of approval listed in Exhibit “B”.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 3 of 15 ends

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Montebella Phase 2/3 Subdivision Map is hereby approved by the Dinuba City Council.

The foregoing resolution was adopted upon a motion of Council member ___________________, second by Council member ___________________, at a regular meeting of the Dinuba City Council on the 13th day of September, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

Page 4 of 15 ends

Exhibit “A” Montebella 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map
Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 5 of 15 ends

Exhibit “B”: Conditions of Approval
1) MAPS AND PLANS
a. The developer shall have a final tract map prepared, in the form prescribed by the Subdivision Map Act and City of Dinuba Municipal Code, by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor. The final tract map shall be digitally submitted to the City of Dinuba Public Works Department. The City maintains a “Final Map Submittal Requirements & Review Checklist” as a resource.
b. The developer shall digitally submit to the City of Dinuba Public Works Department, a set of construction plans on 24" x 36" sheets for all required improvements. These plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer. All applicable plan check and inspection fees shall be paid with the first submittal of plans. All plans shall be approved by the City and all other involved agencies prior to the release of any development permits. The City maintains an “Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements & Review Checklist” as a resource.
c. Prior to beginning any construction, or within twenty (20) calendar days after the approved plans are released by the City, the developer shall submit to the City of Dinuba Public Works Department one (1) reproducible/electronic copy (PDF) and two (2) black line copies of the approved set of construction plans, and two (2) bound sets of the approved construction specifications, if any.
d. Within twenty (20) calendar days after all improvements have been constructed and accepted by the City, the developer shall submit to the City of Dinuba Public Works Department one (1) reproducible/electronic copy (PDF) and two (2) black line copies of the approved set of construction plans revised to reflect all field revisions and marked "AS-BUILT" for review and approval. As-Built drawings shall be revised in electronic format, a scanned or field copy of the construction plans will not be accepted. Pad Certification(s) will be required prior to construction of any structure on a lot. 2) GENERAL
a. The developer shall comply with all conditions set forth in Title 16 of the Dinuba Municipal Code (Subdivisions).
b. The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements and other exactions. Pursuant to Section 66020(d) of the Government Code, these conditions constitute written notice of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. The applicant is hereby notified that the 90day protest period, commencing from the date of approval of the project, has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest regarding any of the fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements or other exactions contained in this notice, complying with all the requirements of Section 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. c. Applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees at the rate in effect at the time of payment. The developer may be eligible for fee credits or fee reimbursements for over- Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 6 of 15 ends

sizing of facilities or construction of other eligible facilities included in the applicable City of Dinuba’s Impact Fee Study(s). The City Engineer will determine the type and extent of improvements that are eligible for fee credits or reimbursements and these shall be established in a Subdivision Agreement, to be approved by the City Council. d. The developer shall furnish security in a sum to be determined by the City Engineer, prior to final acceptance of the off-site improvements by the City, for the guarantee and warranty of the improvements for a period of one (1) year following the completion and acceptance thereof by the City Council.
e. The developer shall submit a soils report for approval by the City Engineer with the first submittal of the improvement plans.
f. The developer shall comply with all the requirements of the local utility (gas and electric), telephone, cable, and other communication companies. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to notify the local utility, telephone, cable, and other communication companies to remove or relocate utility poles where necessary. The City will not accept first submittal of improvement plans without proof that the developer has provided the improvement plans and documents showing all proposed work to the utility, telephone, cable, and other communication companies.
g. The developer shall contact and address all requirements of the United States Postal Service for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed. The location of the facilities shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to approval of improvement plans or any construction.
h. The developer shall comply with and be responsible for obtaining encroachment permits from the City of Dinuba for all work performed within the City's right-of-way and easements.
i. The developer shall install all improvements within public right-of-way and easements in accordance with the City of Dinuba standards, specifications, master plans, and record drawings.
j. All existing overhead and any new utility facilities located on-site, and within the street right-of- way or easements along the streets adjacent to this tract shall be undergrounded unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
k. The developer shall provide and pay for all compaction testing required by the QAP (Quality Assurance Plan).Compaction test results shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval.
l. If the overall development is to be built in phases, then each phase shall have adequate access as required by the City of Dinuba Police and Fire Departments, and the City Engineer. The developer shall submit a schedule showing the sequence of development within the area covered by the tentative map.
m. During the site construction, any public streets fronting the project shall be kept clear of any construction or landscaping debris and shall not be used as a storage area for equipment, materials, or other items.
n. In order to provide for reasonable municipal protection during all phases of construction, the developer shall maintain pedestrian and vehicular access to all surrounding properties and buildings to the satisfaction of the City of Dinuba Police and Fire Department, and City Engineer.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 7 of 15 ends

o. The developer shall be responsible for all actions of his contractors and subcontractors during the course of any work occurring on the site. The developer shall designate, in writing before starting work, an authorized representative who shall have complete authority to represent and to act for the developer. Said authorized representative shall be present at the site of the work at all times while work is actually in progress on the development. During periods when work is suspended, arrangements acceptable to the City Engineer shall be made for any emergency work which may be required. When the developer or his authorized representative is not present on any particular part of the work where it may be desired to give directions, orders may be given by the City Engineer which shall be received and obeyed by the person or persons in charge of the particular work in reference to which the orders are given. Whenever orders are given to the developer's representative or superintendent or foreman to do work required for the convenience and safety of the general public because of inclement weather or any other such cause, such work shall be done at the developer's expense. p. The developers contractors shall not work on, place debris on, store supplies or equipment on, or in any other way encroach upon any other properties without the written permission of such property owners. In the event other properties are encroached upon without written permission, work shall be automatically shut down until resolved. 3) DEDICATIONS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
a. The developer shall provide right-of-way acquisition or dedicate free and clear of all encumbrances and/or improve the all streets to City standards:
i. 56’ Interior Residential Streets:
(1) Dedicate 56’ for public street and utility purposes. (2) Construct improvements as shown on the Tentative Map. Improvements shall include curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb ramps, street lights, and permanent paving.
ii. Englehart Avenue and Saginaw Avenue (Street Designation: Collector):
(1) The developer will be required to widen Englehart Avenue along the frontage of the subdivision and in front of the existing residences that are currently being surrounded by the subdivision. Widening Englehart Avenue will require the demolition of an existing residence. Developer will be required to negotiate the demolition of the house.
iii. Improvements shall include curb and gutter, parkways with street trees, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb ramps, street lights, landscape and irrigation, and permanent paving.
b. Developer shall dedicate a 6’-10’ public utility easement (width as required by affected utility companies) along all streets and all other locations requested by utility companies.

Alternate widths must be approved in writing by all utility companies and a copy of said written approval shall be submitted to the City Engineer. c. Developer shall provide a preliminary title report, legal description, and drawings for all dedications required which are not within the boundary of the subdivision. d. The developer shall install pedestrian-scale antique-style streetlights in accordance with City Standards at the locations designated by the City Engineer. Streetlight locations shall be shown on the utility plans submitted with the final map for approval. Streetlights at traffic signal locations shall be installed on approved traffic signal poles. Streetlights Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 8 of 15 ends

shall be owned and maintained by City of Dinuba. Developer shall prepare a street lighting plan for approval by the City Engineer.
e. Developer shall provide for all striping, stenciling, pavement markers, delineators and signage required of all street improvements within the development. All traffic signs and street name signs shall be installed in accordance with City Standards and the CA MUTCD (latest edition). A striping and signage plan shall be included with the construction plans and submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. f. All street and traffic control sign posts shall be painted gloss black. g. All streets shall be designed to include parkways for street trees. Said parkways shall be at least five feet wide. Each lot shall feature at least two street trees within the parkway, or as deemed appropriate by the City’s landscape design consultant. Parkways along side streets on corner lots shall feature at least three shade trees planted within the parkway, or as deemed appropriate by the City’s landscape design consultant. Maintenance of these trees shall be the responsibility of the Community Facilities District(CFD). All tree species shall be approved by the City’s landscape design consultant and follow the City’s landscape design guidelines, prior to planting.
h. Curb ramps shall be provided at all intersections in conformance with City Standards. i. There shall be stamped and colored concrete paving at the B Street entrance to the site, from curb to curb a minimum length of 25 feet
j. As part of street dedications, developer shall provide corner cut-offs at all street intersections. Corner cut-offs shall be sufficient to provide for sight distances and accommodate curb ramps.
k. The developer shall, at his expense, obtain "R Value" tests in quantity sufficient to represent all street areas, and have street structural sections designed by a registered civil engineer based on these "R Value" tests. These designs shall be compared to the minimum section given below and approved by the City Engineer. ____Street Designation Minimum Section_____________
Local Street 2” HMA/6” AB CLII AB/6” CNS
Collector Street 3” HMA/8” AB CLII AB/6” CNS
l. Standard barricades, per City Standard, with reflectors shall be installed at ends of streets abutting undeveloped property and any other locations to be specified by the City Engineer.
m. The developer shall, at the end of any permanent pavement abutting undeveloped property, install 2”x6” redwood header boards placed prior to street paving. n. All knuckles and cul-de-sacs shall be designed in accordance with City Standards. o. Temporary paved cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of any dead-end streets, planned for future extension, longer than 150’. Minimum radius shall be provided to allow turnaround of emergency equipment.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 9 of 15 ends

4) SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
a. The developer shall identify and abandon all existing septic systems per City Standards and any other governing regulations.
b. The nearest sanitary sewer main available to serve the development is at Englehart and Saginaw The developer shall connect to this existing sewer. The developer’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements. Any alternative routing of sewer service must be approved by the City Engineer and supported by appropriate calculations.
c. The developer shall install sanitary sewer mains of the size and in the locations indicated below:
i. Englehart Avenue: Install 21” sewer main along east side of site to northeast boundary of site.
ii. Interior Streets: Install 8” sewer mains throughout development. d. The developer shall dedicate a minimum 15’ wide easement for all onsite sewer mains not located in otherwise dedicated rights-of-way, if applicable. e. The developer shall install one (1) 4” sewer service house branch to each lot within the development in accordance with City Standards.
f. The developer shall install a 4” sewer service house branch to each lot being surrounded by the existing subdivision.
5) WATER IMPROVEMENTS
a. The developer shall identify and abandon all existing water wells per City Standards and any other governing regulations.
b. The developer shall install water mains of the sizes and in the locations indicated below and provide an adequately looped water system. The developer’s engineer shall be responsible for verifying the size, location, and elevations of existing improvements.
i. Englehart Avenue: Install 12” water main along the east side of the site to the northeast boundary of site.
ii. Englehart Avenue: Install 8” water main from the point of connection in Englehart Avenue into the development.
iii. Interior Streets: Install 8” water mains throughout development. c. The developer shall dedicate a 10’ wide easement for all onsite water mains, hydrants, blow-offs, and water meters not located in otherwise dedicated rightsof-way, if applicable. d. The developer shall install a City Standard water service, size as necessary, to each lot within the development in accordance with City Standards.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 10 of 15 ends

e. The developer shall install a City Standard landscape water service, size as necessary, to each public landscape area within the development in accordance with City Standards.
f. The developer shall install one (1) water sampling station in accordance with City Standards. The location shall be determined by the City Engineer. g. No water service connection shall be made to the City of Dinuba Water System until a bacteriological report has been accepted by the City Engineer. h. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations approved by the Fire Department.

Fire hydrants and curbs shall be painted per City Standards. 6) GRADING AND DRAINAGE
a. The developer shall, for construction activity prior to clearing, grading or excavation on one (1) acre or more of land area or are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, obtain a NPDES permit and implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable and Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology to reduce or eliminate storm water pollution. Plans for these requirements shall be included in the construction plan set and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
b. Plans for the required storm drainage systems shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the City of Dinuba Storm Drain Design Guidelines (Attachment ‘F’), Developer’s engineer shall implement best management practices (BMPs) outlines in the Design Guidelines for peak flow reduction. The BMPs recommended in the report are designed to accommodate either the 85th percentile storm (0.32 inches) or the 100-year, 24-hour storm. c. A percolation test signed and sealed by a California registered civil or geotechnical engineer shall demonstrate that BMPs can completely infiltrate within 96 hours.
d. The developer will be required to design and construct the storm drain master plan basin adjacent to the westerly limits of the subdivision. All storm drain piping necessary for the development will not be reimbursable unless it is necessary for storm drain master plan facilities. City will reimburse the oversized piping costs. e. The developer will be required to perform shoulder stabilization on Nebraska Avenue from Englehart Avenue to Viscaya Avenue. This work will be fully reimbursed by the City of Dinuba and the design shall be approved by the City Engineer.
f. Developer’s engineer shall prepare hydrology and hydraulic calculations (H&H) for any proposed storm drain system and submit with the grading plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. Developer’s engineer shall consult with City Engineer for calculation requirements.
g. Grade differentials between lots and adjacent properties shall be adequately shown on the grading plan and shall be treated in a manner in conformance with City Standards. Any retaining walls required 12” or higher shall be masonry or concrete construction and any retaining walls required less than 12” may be Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 11 of 15 ends

wood, masonry, or concrete construction. All retaining walls shall be designed by a registered civil engineer.
h. Prior to the approval of grading plan, approvals and permits from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District shall be obtained. The Project shall comply with all rules, regulations and conditions of approval imposed by the District.
i. The developer shall maintain a program of dust control to prevent air pollution as well as discomfort or damage to adjacent and surrounding properties. The developer shall follow all requirements and recommendations made by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for dust and emission reduction. 7) LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
a. The developer, as a portion of the required tract improvements, shall provide landscaping and irrigation as required herein. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in public right-of- way and all other areas reserved for landscaping. Plans for the required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be prepared by an appropriately qualified professional and conform to the City of Dinuba Standard Drawings (Attachment ‘C’), Landscape Design Guidelines (Attachment ‘D’), Low Impact Development Technical Memo (Attachment ‘E’), and the California Model Water Efficiency Ordinance. Public landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in the following locations:
i. The developer will be required to construct a park. The plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and shall be approved by the City of Dinuba.

The park shall consist of three different play structures, a half-court basketball court, ample lighting, seating, walkways, splashpad, and other various park amenities.
ii. Planter strips within all interior streets.
iii. Landscaping within median divider on entrance street from Englehart Avenue (“B Street”).
b. The property owner shall request annexation to the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD). The property owner acknowledges and agrees that such request serves as a petition pursuant to California State Proposition 218 and no further election will be required for the establishment of the initial assessment. The assessment for each lot must be obtained from the City for the tax year following the recordation of the final map.

The property owner shall consent to the first-year assessment and annual increases per the provisions of the CFD. The property owner/developer shall notify all potential lot buyers before they actually purchase a lot that this tract is a part of a CFD. Said notification shall be in a manner approved by the City. The property owner/developer shall supply all necessary assessment diagrams and other pertinent materials for the CFD annually until the entire tract is built out or for three years after annexation to the district, whichever is longer.
c. The developer shall contact and address all requirements of the Alta Irrigation District (AID). The developer will be required to underground the existing AID (Alta Irrigation District) canal along the frontage of the existing residence currently surrounded by the subdivision. This may also include, but not be limited to, dedicating easements, piping or relocating any existing AID canals or ditches, replacing any existing irrigation piping, concrete lining or improving any existing canals, construction or reconstruction of any Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 12 of 15 ends

canals, culverts, and bridge crossings. Plans for these requirements and improvements shall be included in the previously required set of construction plans and submitted to and approved by AID prior to the release of any development permits or recording of the final map. If an AID or private irrigation line is proposed to be abandoned, the developer shall provide waivers from AID and all downstream users.
d. The developer shall indicate on construction drawings the depth, location and type of material of any existing AID irrigation line along the proposed or existing street rights-ofway or onsite. Any existing canals or ditches shall be piped. The material of the existing pipe shall be upgraded to the proper class of rubber gasket pipe at all locations unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
e. All existing onsite agricultural irrigation systems either onsite or within public rights-ofway, whether AID or privately owned shall be identified prior to any construction activity on the site. Service to all downstream users of irrigation water shall be maintained at all times through preservation of existing facilities or, if the existing facilities are required to be relocated, the relocation and replacement of the existing facilities. It is the intent that downstream users not bear any burden as a result of the development. Therefore, the developer shall bear all costs related to modification, relocation, or repair of any existing irrigation facilities resulting from or necessitated by the development. The developer shall identify on the construction plans all existing irrigations systems and their disposition (abandonment, repair, relocation, and or piping) for approval by the City Engineer. The developer shall consult with the AID for any additional requirements for lines to be abandoned, relocated, or piped. The developer shall provide waivers from all users in order to abandon or modify any irrigation systems or for any service interruptions resulting from development activities.
8) MISCELLANEOUS
a. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to remove all existing structures, trees, shrubs, etc., that are within or encroaching on existing or proposed rights-of-way or easements. Existing street improvements shall be preserved, at the discretion of the City Engineer.
b. The developer shall provide clean-up, street sweeping and dust control during the construction of the development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Public Works Director. A deposit of $5,000.00 shall be submitted to the City to guarantee compliance.

At any time, developer is deemed to be non-compliant by the City Engineer or Public Works Director, the City may draw from said deposit to pay for necessary activities to bring the site into compliance.
c. The developer shall install monuments at all section corners, quarter section corners, all street centerline intersection points, angle points, and beginning of curves and end of curves on streets adjacent to or within the development. Any existing section corner or property corner monuments damaged or destroyed by the development shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A licensed land surveyor or civil engineer licensed to perform land surveying shall certify the placement of all required monumentation prior to final acceptance
d. Within five days after the final setting of all monuments has been completed, the engineer or surveyor shall give written notice to the City Engineer that the final monuments have been set. Upon payment to the engineer or surveyor for setting the final monuments, the developer shall present to the City Engineer evidence of the payment and receipt thereof by the engineer or surveyor.

Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 13 of 15 ends

e. A deferment, modification, or waiver of any engineering conditions will require the express written approval of the City Engineer.
f. The conditions given herein are for the entire development. Additional requirements for individual phases may be necessary pending review by the City Engineer. g. The developer shall install concrete masonry block walls in accordance with City Standards, with a minimum height of 6’-8” feet above the high side ground elevation, and of a design and color approved by the City of Dinuba Planning Department at the following locations:
i. Englehart Ave: South line of lot 32 to north line of lot 34 proceeding west along north line of lot 34 to Plum Street (tapering down to 42 inches high within the required front yard setback.. Also along the south side of Lot 34 from Plum Street east to Englehart Avenue, then north to the northeast corner of Lot 38.

Along the south side of Lot 34 the fence shall taper down to 42 inches high within the required front yard setback.
ii. Along the entire north side of Saginaw Avenue currently located within the limits of the subdivision.
iii. Along the south side of lots 25 to lot 31.
iv. Along the south side of Lot 1, parallel to Saginaw Avenue. This fence shall taper to 42 inches high within the required front yard setback area. v. Masonry block walls that retain more than 8” shall be designed by a registered civil engineer.
h. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Dinuba Fire Department, Dinuba Police Department and the City’s solid waste contractor (Pena’s Disposal). 9) PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
a. Floor plans and facades of homes shall vary on each lot. No two same floor plans shall be located adjacent to one another. Further, no two of the same front façade designs shall be located adjacent to one another. The developer shall provide a map to the Dinuba Planning Department showing façade types and floor plans of the entire subdivision to ensure consistency with this requirement. Home facades and floor plans are shown in Attachments G-1 through G-5 of the staff report to the Planning Commission.
10) ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES
Air Quality
AIR - 1) Before a construction permit is issued for the proposed Project, the project applicant, project sponsor, or construction contractor shall submit construction emissions minimization plans to the City of Dinuba for review and approval. The construction emissions minimization plans shall provide reasonably detailed compliance with the following requirements:

Page 14 of 15 ends

comply with Tier 4 Final off-road emission standards are not commercially available, then the construction contractor shall use the next cleanest piece of off-road equipment (e.g., Tier 4 Interim) that is commercially available. For purposes of this project design feature, “commercially available” shall mean the equipment at issue is available taking into consideration factors such as (i) critical-path timing of construction; and (ii) geographic proximity to the project site of equipment. If the relevant equipment is determined by the project applicant to not be commercially available, the contractor can confirm this conclusion by providing letters from at least two rental companies for each piece of off-road equipment that is at issue.

Biological Resources
BIO - 1) To the extent practicable, construction shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season, which extends from February through August.

BIO - 2) If it is not possible to schedule construction between September and January, preconstruction surveys for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to ensure that no active nests will be disturbed during Project implementation. A preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the initiation of construction activities. During this survey, the qualified biologist shall inspect all potential nest substrates in and immediately adjacent to the impact area for nests. If an active nest is found close enough to the construction area to be disturbed by these activities, the qualified biologist shall determine the extent of a construction-free buffer to be established around the nest. If work cannot proceed without disturbing the nesting birds, work may need to be halted or redirected to other areas until nesting and fledging are completed or the nest has otherwise failed for non-construction related reasons.

If the coroner determines that Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c) require that he give notice to the Native American Heritage Commission, then such notice shall be given within 24 hours, as required by Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c). In that event, the NAHC will conduct the notifications required by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Until the consultations described below have been completed, the landowner shall further ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or Dinuba City Council
Resolution 2022-54
Montebella Phase 2/3 Tentative Subdivision Map

Page 15 of 15 ends

practices where Native American human remains are located, is not disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the Most Likely Descendants on all reasonable options regarding the descendants' preferences and treatments, as prescribed by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b). The NAHC will mediate any disputes regarding treatment of remains in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.94(k). The landowner shall be entitled to exercise rights established by Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(e) if any of the circumstances established by that provision become applicable.

Transportation/Circulation
TRA-1 The Tulare County guidelines include detailed instructions for mitigation if a project has significant impacts. The guidelines state “The preferred method of VMT mitigation in Tulare County is for project applicants to provide transportation improvements that facilitate travel by walking, bicycling, or transit.” In accordance with these guidelines, a survey was conducted within a half mile of the Project to determine any pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities deficiencies exist. After review, there were existing curb returns which do not meet current ADA requirements for ramps. The identified improvements include the following:
• East side of Adelaide Way & Englehart Avenue (2 ramps) • East side of Kelly Drive & Englehart Avenue (2 ramps) • South side of Kelly Drive & Morningside Drive (2 ramps) • North side of Kelly Drive & Morningside Drive (2 ramps) Total project cost is estimated at approximately $24,000 with a 20 percent contingency. The guidelines include a minimum cost for mitigation of $20 per daily trip generated by the project.

The project is anticipated to generate 1055 daily trips, which equates to a target value of improvements of $21,100. At the time of construction should prices fluctuate, an adjustment in the scope of improvements may need to be made.

Attachment “F” Location Map
N O ST

N NEWTON DR

N ALTA AVE

E EL MONTE WAY

E MAGNOLIA WAY

E PARK WAY

E KAMM AVE

W EL MONTE WAY
S Q ST

E GOLDEN WAY

LOIS LN
S K ST

E GERALD AVE

W KELLY DR

VERNAZZA AVE

WALDO WAY

N LYNDS AY WAY

E MILLARD WAY
AVENUE 426

S GREENE AVE

BRENT RD

E SEQUOIA DR

N HAYES AVE

N SYCAMORE DR

W NEBRASKA AVE

E VASSAR AVE
BIRCH

SAN ANTONIO AVE
N L ST

S MYRTLE AVE

W TULARE ST
N M ST
OAK DR

N SMITH AVE

N CEDAR LN

E NEBRASKA AVE

W NORTH WAY

W PAMELA LN

E TERRACE DR

GRACE LN

N MARK DR

E MARIPOSA ST

N PERRY AVE

N LINCOLN AVE
AVENUE 406

HEATHER AVE

E ELIZABETH WAY

N GLADYS AVE

DAISY CT

E HARVARD AVE
AVENUE 412

E NORTHRIDGE DR

E YALE AVE
S O ST

E PRINCETON AVE

E ACADEMY WAY
S 1ST AVE

RANDLE RD

E MEADOW LN

N WH TI NEY AVE
S M ST

VERON ICA AVE

E MERCED ST

GOLDEN WAY

E FRESNO ST

W SIERRA WAY
ASH
S L ST
N H ST

E AKERS WA Y

EL PASO AVE
S P ST
S J ST

S URUAPAN DR
S I ST

S MILSAP AVE
MAPLE
PINE

ARNO RD
OAK

CARA RD

SAGINAW AVE
AVENUE 424
ROAD 64

EL MONTE WAY

N BATES AVE

N NICHOLS AVE

W FRANKLIN WAY N VERMONT AVE

E OLIVE WAY
ROAD 84

EDWARD PL

N MCKINLEY AVE

W ADELA IDE WAY
AVENUE 424

PEONY DR

GRIGGS AVE
AVENUE 404

SURABIAN DR
ROAD 88

T MI OTHY AVE

LAUREN AVE

S SHORT AVE
ROAD 92
AVENUE 408

MONTE V SI TA DR
AVENUE 404

SAMANTHA WAY

W WAYSIDE DR
ROAD 92
AVENUE 420
AVENUE 426
AVENUE 408

PEDERSON AVE
ROAD 66
ROAD 62
ROAD 70
S ROAD 72
AVENUE 422
ROAD 72
ROAD 68
AVENUE 428

N LILLIE AVE

S COLLEGE AVE

N EUCLID AVE

N V LI LA AVE

LAVENDER AVE

S CRAWFORD AVE

S ALTA AVE
S 2ND AVE

RANDLE AVE

N ALICE ST

ENGLEHART AVE

N EATON AVE
ROAD 74

V SI CAYA PKY
ROAD 64

ALTA AVE

RIDGE CREEK DR
O
City of Dinuba
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Annexation
boundary
El Monte Way
Englehart Ave.

Cross-hatched
portion to be
subdivided
Existing city
limit boundary
Attachment “G” Aerial Photo
Area to be
annexed
(red border)
Englehart Ave. (Road 72)
Saginaw Way
north
Proposed
subdivision
(yellow
border)
Attachment “H” Proposed Tentative Subdivision Map
Attachment I-1:

Plan 1298 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-1- a
Attachment I-1:

Plan 1298 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-1- b
Attachment I-1:

Plan 1298 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-1- c
Attachment I-2:

Plan 1498 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-2- a
Attachment I-2:

Plan 1498 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-2- b
Attachment I-2:

Plan 1498 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-2- c
Attachment I-3:

Plan 1595 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-3- a
Attachment I-3:

Plan 1595 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-3- b
Attachment I-3:

Plan 1595 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-3- c
Attachment I-4:

Plan 1875 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-4- a
Attachment I-4:

Plan 1875 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-4- b
Attachment I-4:

Plan 1875 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-4- c
Attachment I-5:

Plan 2076 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-5- a
Attachment I-5:

Plan 2076 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-5- b
Attachment I-5:

Plan 2076 Floor Plan and Architectural Elevation Drawings I-5- c
City Council Staff Report
Department: ENGINEER/PLANNING September 13, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Watts, City Engineer
Subject: Award of Contract to Agee Construction for the El Monte Sewer Main Replacement Project (JW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to award the contract for the El Monte Sewer Main Replacement Project to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $199,654 and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the contract documents.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A portion of a 12" sewer main in El Monte between Lillie Avenue and Alice Avenue is an old line that needs to be replaced to prevent possible leakage. The project was formally advertised and three (3) bids were received. The lowest responsive bid was received from Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $199,654. Staff is requesting that the City Council award the bid to Agee Construction Corporation.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The City conducted an investigation of a sewer line in El Monte that frequently backed up and it was determined that a 300/ft portion of the line needs to be replaced. The project will consist of the removal of the existing 12" damaged sewer main and installation of the new 12" sewer main between Lillie and Alice Ave.

Staff solicited bids and received a total of three (3) proposals by the August 31, 2022 deadline. The bids are summarized, as follows:

CONTRACTOR TOTAL
Agee Construction Corporation $199,654.00
Dawson-Mauldin LLC $239,650.00
Haydon Construction Inc. $269,150.00
The lowest bid proposal was submitted by Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $199,654. 4Creeks Inc. has worked with the contractor on various other projects in town and in other jurisdictions. Agee Construction is currently completing the Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue Roundabout and has a proven track record with these types of projects. Staff is recommending that the contract be awarded to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $199,654. A copy of the Agee Construction Corporation bid proposal is enclosed herein as Attachment 'A'.

Staff recommends Council award the contract for the El Monte Sewer Main Replacement Project to Agee Construction Corporation in the amount of $199,654 and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the contract documents.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City budgeted ARPA funds for this project Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Agee Bid Proposal

City Council Staff Report
Department: FINANCE SERVICES September 13, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Cash and Investment Report for the Year Ending June 30, 2022 (KS)

RECOMMENDATION
Council accept the City of Dinuba Cash and Investment report for the second half of fiscal year 2021/22 ending June 30, 2022.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The investment report summarizes the city's cash and rates of return on investments. The cash investment report presented herein represents the second half of the 2021/22 fiscal year and summarizes the 2021/22 fiscal year’s return on investments.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
Cash and Investment Summary
The cash and investment summary for the second half of fiscal year 2021/22 covers the city’s cash position and return on investments through the fiscal year, ended June 30, 2022.

The city’s cash and investments as of June 30, 2022 total $60.20 million as reflected on Table 1 and summarized in Attachment ‘A’.

Table 1: Cash Summary as of June 30, 2022
Investment Type Amount
(in millions)
Portfolio
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) $50.20
Money Market Deposit $0.02
Trustee Cash and Investments $1.75
Banks & Deposits $8.23
Total Cash & Investments $60.20
Managed Investments
The city invests the majority of its cash in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). LAIF is a pooled investment fund established by the state to provide cities with safe investment option that is administered by the State of California Treasurer’s Office. As such, earnings or returns are typically lower than more aggressive investment vehicles. A small portion of cash is also invested in the Public Investment Money Market Account (PIMMA).

As of June 30, 2022, the city has a total of $50.2 million invested in LAIF and PIMMA with interest earnings of 0.75% and 0.861%, respectively.

The city’s managed investment summary is enclosed as Attachment ‘A’. Performance summary for the city’s cash investments are shown on Table 2.

Managed Investment Summary
Quarter
Ending
Portfolio
Balance
City
Monthly
Portfolio
Rate
Tulare
County
Investment
Pool
2 Year
Treasury
Federal
Funds
Rate
September
30, 2021 $38.29M 0.24% 1.17% 0.28% 0.00%
December
31, 2021 $43.31M 0.23% 0.93% 0.73% 0.00%
March 31,
2021 $56.36M 0.32% 0.89% 2.33% 0.00%
June 30,
2021 $50.20M 0.75% 0.97% 2.95% 1.50%
Earnings in LAIF are expected to continue rising through the first quarter of fiscal year 2022/23 as the fed continues to raise interest rates to combat high inflation.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Cash and Investment Summary
B. Managed Investments
Attachment 'A'

INSTITUTION PURPOSE BALANCE TOTAL

CASH IN BANKS
MECHANICS BANK A/P, PAYROLL, GOLF 8,156,394
BANK OF THE SIERRA POLICE 68,176
PETTY CASH VARIOUS DEPTS 6,670
Total Cash Deposits 8,231,240

CASH AND INVESTMENTS WITH FISCAL AGENTS (TRUSTEE)

US BANK
SAFE DRINKING WATER 448,501
2012 LEASE REVENUE BONDS 714,670
2012 WASTEWATER REVENUE BONDS 588,521
Total Trustee Deposits 1,751,693

PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS
MECHANICS BANK MONEY MARKET DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 22,136
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND 50,203,138
Total Portfolio Investments 50,225,275
TOTAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS $ 60,208,207

CITY OF DINUBA CASH & INVESTMENTS SUMMARY
As of June 30, 2022
Attachment 'B'
Sep-21 Type Value Interest Rate
LAIF 38,118,595 0.240% 91,484.63
PIMMA 172,092 0.206% 354.51
$ 91,839.14 38,290,687 $ 0.24%
Dec-21 Type Value Interest Rate
LAIF 43,142,383 0.230% 99,227.48
PIMMA 172,122 0.212% 364.90
$ 99,592.38 43,314,504 $ 0.23%
Mar-22 Type Value Interest Rate
LAIF 50,166,294 0.320% 160,532.14
PIMMA 22,135 0.365% 80.79
$ 160,612.93 50,188,429 $ 0.32%
Jun-22 Type Value Interest Rate
LAIF 50,203,138 0.750% 376,523.54
PIMMA 22,136 0.861% 190.59
$ 376,714.13 50,225,274 $ 0.75%
Managed Investments Fiscal Year Ended 2021-22
City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE September 13, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Daniel James, Assistant City Manager
Subject:

Resolution No. 2022-48 of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba authorizing the transfer of certain real property assets from the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba to the City of Dinuba, and approving related actions (DJ)

RECOMMENDATION
In its capacity as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba, Council to adopt Resolution No. 2022-48, authorizing the transfer of certain real property assets from the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba to the City of Dinuba, and approving certain related actions.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This matter concerns the transfer of certain real property assets designated as “Future Development” Sites within the Successor Agency’s Long-Range Property Management Plan (the “LRPMP”) as Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017- 121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017-020-001 [Site No. 15].

Approval of the attached Resolution constitutes a conditional and limited transfer of the Property pursuant to the LRPMP and the DOF Determination (as described below)L, which designate and bind the City to implement the LRPMP on behalf of the Successor Agency through the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba was dissolved on February 1, 2012. Consistent with the provisions of the HSC (HSC § 34172 (a) (1)), the City Council of the City of Dinuba previously elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency previously established the “Dinuba Oversight Board” to assist in the wind-down of the former redevelopment agency through June 30, 2018, at which time it was dissolved by operation of law. On July 1, 2018 the Tulare County Oversight Board (CWOB) was established to assist in winding-down the dissolved redevelopment agencies within the County of Tulare.

The Long-Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP), provides direction for the disposition and use of the real property assets held by the Successor Agency. The document includes 42 parcels of land, divided among 19 separate sites, 12 of which were designated for “Government Use”, three (3) of which were designated for “Future Development”, three (3) of which were designated “For Sale” and one (1) of which was subject to an “Enforceable Obligation” (reference the sites and parcels summary provided on pages 4-6 of the LRPMP).

The Future Development designated Sites are identified within the Long-Range Property Management Plan as Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017-121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017-020-001 [Site No. 15] provides property details of each Site is attached herein as Attachment 'A'. The LRPMP requires that the Future Development designed Sites be transferred to the City and designates the City as the responsible entity, in lieu of the Successor Agency, for the future disposition of Sites designated for Future Development and for compliance with the applicable provisions of the HSC governing the future transfer of these Sites to third parties. Consistent with the City’s LRPMP Obligations and DOF’s confirmations, the Successor Agency may transfer its remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development” within the LRPMP to the City, which are more particularly described within Exhibit “A” to the attached Resolution, and that the City may process Compensation Agreements (or similar instruments) in the future, which is anticipated to occur when such real property assets are transferred to third-party entities.

Approval of the attached Resolution No. 2022-48, which is attached herein as Attachment 'B', authorizes the transfer to the City of Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017-121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017- 020-001 [Site No. 15] by no cost via quitclaim deed, and designates the City to implement the LRPMP on behalf of the Successor Agency through the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities. The transfer of the subject property is also consistent with the California Government Code (the “GC”) § 54234 (b) and § 103 of the Surplus Land Act (the “SLA”) which states that such properties are exempt from the California Surplus Land Act if the transfer is completed by December 31, 2022.

Staff recommends Council Approve Resolution No. 2022-48, authorizing the transfer of real property listed in the LongRange Property Management Plan as Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017-121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017-020-001 [Site No. 15] to the City of Dinuba, and authorize s the City Manager or designee to execute all necessary documentation require to complete the transfer.

FISCAL IMPACT
Per the HSC and the LRPMP, upon the ultimate sale or lease of the Property, the net proceeds (net of the City’s costs of sale or lease) will be submitted to the Tulare County Auditor-Controller (the “CAC”). Once received, the CAC will in turn distribute the funds to the effected taxing entities in proportion to each taxing entities’ proportionate share of the General Tax Levy (the ”GTL”). Effected taxing entities are those that receive a share of the GTL attributable to the Tax Rate Area (the “TRA”) in which the Property is located, which includes the City of Dinuba. As an exemplar only, Dinuba’s proportion of the GTL during FY 2019-20 was approximately 18.9%.

PUBLIC HEARING
None Required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Long Range Prperty Management Plan (LRPMP)
B. 2022-48 AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ASSETS FROM THE SUCCESSOR

AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF DINUBA TO THE CITY OF DINUBA 2015 LONG RANGE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT PLAN
Prepared for the:

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
405 East El Monte Way
Dinuba, CA 93618
www.dinuba.ca.gov
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Prepared by:

Urban Futures Inc.

Corporate Office
3111 North Tustin Street,
Suite 230
Orange, CA 92865
(714) 283-9334 • FAX (714) 283-5465
Emilio Morales, Mayor – District 1
Scott Harness, Vice-Mayor – District 3
Maribel Reynosa, Councilmember – District 2
Kuldip Thusu, Councilmember – District 4
Mike Smith, Councilmember – District 5

CITY STAFF

Luis Patlan, City Manager/Executive Director
Cass Cook, Director of Finance
2015 LONG RANGE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT PLAN

CITY COUNCIL/

SUCCESSOR

AGENCY BOARD
i
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 II. Long‐Range Property Management Plan Property Inventory Data...................................................... 4 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use .............................................................................. 7 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development......................................................................... 46 V. Property to be Sold............................................................................................................................. 57 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation ..................................................................................... 71 Exhibit A – Successor Agency/City Property Disposition Procedures......................................................... 76 Exhibit B – Health & Safety Code ................................................................................................................ 79 Exhibit C – DOF Finding Of Completion ...................................................................................................... 82 Exhibit D – Resolution of the Successor Agency Board .............................................................................. 84 Exhibit E – Resolution of the Oversight Board............................................................................................ 88 Exhibit F – Assessor Parcel Maps................................................................................................................ 94 Exhibit G – Zoning Information................................................................................................................. 108 2015 LONG RANGE PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT PLAN
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
1 I. Introduction
I. Introduction
The City of Dinuba (the “City”), incorporated in 1906, is the 5th largest municipality by population in Tulare County, and is part of the Visalia Metropolitan Statistical Area. The City spans approximately 6.5 square miles. As of January 1, 2015, the California Department of Finance (the “DOF”) reports the City’s population to be 23,966.

Former Redevelopment
Agency
The Former Redevelopment Agency of
the City of Dinuba (the “Agency”) was
organized in 1984, pursuant to § 33000
et seq. of the California Health and
Safety Code (the “HSC”) and was
responsible for the administration of
redevelopment activities within the
City. The governing board of the
Agency was composed of the five
members of the City Council.

The City Council of the City (the “City
Council”) adopted Redevelopment
Plan No. 1 (“Plan No. 1”) for the City
of Dinuba Redevelopment Project
(“Project No. 1”) by City Council
Ordinance No. 668 on July 6, 1984,
adopted Redevelopment Plan No. 2
(“Plan No. 2”) for the Dinuba
Redevelopment Project No.2 (“Project
No. 2”) by City Council Ordinance No.
89-04 on June 27, 1989, and adopted
Amendment No. 1 to Project No. 2 by City Council Ordinance No. 90-18 on June 26, 1990. On November 12, 1991, the City Council adopted a “merger” amendment to Plan Nos. 1 and 2 (the “Merged Plan”) by Ordinance No. 91-13. The Merged Plan was subsequently amended five times, each time adding territory:
(i) Amendment No. 1 – adopted November 12, 1993, by Ordinance 93-11; (ii) Amendment No. 2 – adopted June 27, 1995, by Ordinance No. 95-06; (iii) Amendment No. 3 – adopted July 10, 2001, by Ordinance No. 2001-08; (iv) Amendment No. 4 – adopted July 12, 2005, by Ordinance No. 2005-14; and (v) Amendment No. 5 – adopted July 8,2008, by Ordinance No. 2008-03.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
2 I. Introduction
Dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies
Trailer bills ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 were signed by the Governor of California on June 28, 2011, making certain changes to the HSC, including adding Part 1.8 (commencing with § 34161) (“Part 1.8”) and Part

1.85 (commencing with § 34170) (“Part 1.85”) to Division 24 of the HSC. The California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of California (California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Matosantos, et al. (Case No. S194861)) alleging that ABx1 26 and ABx1 27 were unconstitutional. On December 29, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in the Matosantos case largely upholding ABx1 26, invalidating ABx1 27, and holding that ABx1 26 may be severed from ABx1 27 and enforced independently. The Supreme Court generally revised the effective dates and deadlines for performance of obligations under HSC Part 1.85 arising before May 1, 2012 to take effect four months later while leaving the effective dates or deadline for performance of obligations under HSC Part 1.8 unchanged. Consistent with the applicable provisions of the HSC, the City Council elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba (the “Successor Agency”).

Further, on June 27, 2012, the Governor signed budget trailer bill AB 1484 into law, resulting in further procedural and substantive changes to the duties of and procedures to be followed by successor agencies, oversight boards, county auditor-controllers and the California Department of Finance (the “DOF”). This includes, but is not limited to, the manner in which the Successor Agency disposes of real property assets.

Specifically, AB 1484 added HSC § 34191.5 which requires the Successor Agency to prepare a Long Range Property Management Plan (the “LRPMP”) as a prerequisite to the disposition of real property assets.

Long Range Property Management Plan
Per the applicable provisions of the HSC, no later than six (6) months after a successor agency receives its Finding of Completion from the DOF (per HSC § 34179.7), the Successor Agency must submit its LRPMP to the Oversight Board and the DOF for approval. The LRPMP must include an inventory (with specified information) about each property, and address the use or disposition of each property. Permitted uses for the property pursuant to AB 1484 include:

1. Retention of the property for governmental use;

2. Retention of the property for future development;

3. Sale of the property; and

4. Use of the property to fulfill an enforceable obligation.1 Upon DOF’s approval of the LRPMP, the properties are to be placed in a Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund administered by the Successor Agency in accordance with the approved LRPMP. If the LRPMP plan calls for use or liquidation (sale to obtain revenues) of a property for a project identified in an approved redevelopment plan, that property is to be transferred to the sponsoring community for that purpose. If the LRPMP calls for the liquidation of the property or use of revenues from the property for purposes other than a project identified in a redevelopment plan or other than to fulfill an enforceable obligation, the proceeds from the sale are to be distributed as property taxes to the taxing entities. A general outline of real property disposition procedure is included as Exhibit “A.” 1 HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2))
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
3 I. Introduction
This LRPMP was prepared in compliance with those pertinent sections of the HSC that govern the LRPMP’s prerequisites, content, and approval process. For ease of review, the pertinent sections of the HSC are included in Exhibit “B.”
The Successor Agency received its Finding of Completion from the DOF on July 29, 2015 (Exhibit “C”).

The LRPMP was approved by Resolution of the Successor Agency Board on October 27, 2015 (Exhibit “D”) and approved by Resolution of the Oversight Board on November 3, 2015 (Exhibit “E”).

The Amended November 2015 LRPMP was approved by Resolution of the Oversight Board on December 21, 2015 (Exhibit “E”).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan September 2015
Amended November 2015
4 I. Introduction
II. Long-Range Property Management Plan Property Inventory Data The Successor Agency has jurisdiction over 43 parcels grouped into 18 sites (the “Properties”), all of which are located within the boundaries of the City and subject to the provisions of the Agency’s Project Area Redevelopment Plan and any subsequent mergers and amendments, the Agency’s Five-Year Implementation Plan 2005-2010, the City’s General Plan, Municipal Code and land use regulations, and related Specific Plans.

Successor Agency: Dinuba
County: Tulare
LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA Site Data Property Value/Sale Info Other Property Information HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A)

SALE OF

PROPERTY
(If applicable)
HSC §
34191.5
(c)(1)(B)
HSC § 34191.5
(c)(1)(C)
HSC §
34191.5
(c)(1)(D)
HSC § 34191.5
(c)(1)(E)
HSC §
34191.5
(c)(1)(F)
HSC § 34191.5
(c)(1)(G)
HSC § 34191.5
(c)(1)H)
Site No. Address APN Prop Type 1
Permissible
Use
If Sale of
Prop…Proceed
s to be used
for? Permissible Use Detail
Acquisition
Date Value at Time of Acquisition Est’d Current Value 2 Date of Est’d Current Value Est’d Current Value Basis Proposed Sale
Value
Proposed Sale
Date
Purpose for
which property
was acquired
Lot Size
(acres)
Current Zoning Est’d Current Parcel Value
Annual
Estimate
Income/Rev
Contractual
use income/rev
Historic
environmental
contamination
/ reports? Potential as a TOD?
Advancements
of SA planning
objectives? History of previous develop proposals and activity? 1 Dinuba Police
Community Service
Office
168 South “L” St. 017-122-011 Public Building GU N/A Local Gov’t Building Aug 1999 $70,000 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.09 C-2 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 2 Dinuba Transit Center 180 W. Merced St. 017-113-009 Public Building GU N/A Local Gov’t Building Jan 2002 $205,000 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.69 C-4 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 3 Ventura Street Right-ofWay Ventura Street 017-300-025 Roadway / Walkway GU N/A Right-of-Way Feb 2002 $10 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.14 M-1 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 4 Shopper’s Alley Walkway
Park
Between K and L
Streets 017-121-025 Roadway / Walkway / Park GU N/A Right-of-Way Jan 1995 $18,865 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.08 C-2 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 5 Kamm Avenue City
Water Well Site
Kamm Ave. East of
S. Greene Ave. 017-210-016 Other GU N/A Water Well Jul 1991 $16,956 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.27 RCO $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 6 Dinuba Community Park
Sportsplex Facility
201 N. Uruapan Dr.
017-202-015
Public Building GU N/A Parks May 2009 $403,442 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.22 M-1 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 017-202-019 1.48 7 Rose Ann Vuich Park
Property
189 N. Perry Ave. 014-171-006
Park / Open
Space GU N/A Park
Jul
2005 $179,732
$1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight

0.14 RCO $1.00 None N/A
No
157 N. Perry Ave. 014-171-008 No Yes No Aug 2005 $173,474 0.18 Yes 259 N. Perry Ave. 014-171-012 Jan 2008 $151,238 0.14 No 1 Real Property in Fee, unless otherwise noted 2 See Exhibit “F” for Assessor Parcel Maps 3 Local factors that may affect land value were not taken into consideration. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary greatly from the ECV. The ECV is only a planning number and may not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. 4 See Exhibit “G” for zoning information 5 Staff continues to search records for acquisition date C-2 – Downtown Commercial District C-4 – General Commercial District CAC – County Auditor controller EO – Enforceable Obligation on approved ROPS FD – Future Development GU – Government Use M-1 – Light Industrial District N/A – Not applicable RCO – Recreational Open Space RM – Multiple Family Residential TE – Taxing Entities TBD – To Be Determined Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan September 2015
Amended November 2015
5 I. Introduction
LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA Site Data Property Value/Sale Info Other Property Information HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A)

SALE OF

0.14 RCO $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No
320 California Ave. 018-042-002 Jun 2001 $65,481 0.14 350 California Ave. 018-042-004 Mar 2005 $95,000 0.14 366 California Ave. 018-042-005 Apr 2008 $126,272 0.11 388 California Ave. 018-042-006 May 2002 $45,875 0.14 9 Dinuba Entertainment
Park Plaza
S. “L” Street 017-141-007
Park / Open
Space GU N/A Park
Nov
1998 $39,171
$1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight

0.17 C-2
$1.00 None N/A
No
No Yes No
017-141-014
288 South “M” St. 017-144-009 Aug 2004 $1.00 0.34 C-4 Yes 289 South “L” St.
017-144-003 Jun 1987 $8,086 0.17
017-144-004 C-2 No Mar 2011 5 $240,338 0.17 017-144-005 Mar 2011 5 0.17 10 Centennial Park 1591 W. Sierra Way 017-030-025 Park / Open Space GU N/A Park Feb 1998 $100,301 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 1.00 M-1 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 11 “K” St Parking Lot
Between K and L
Streets
017-121-023 Parking Lot /
Structure GU N/A Parking Lot
Feb
1992 $66,027 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor
Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 0.28 C-2 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 017-121-004 Jan 1995 $21,223 0.09 12 Groundwater
Recharge/Recovery
Property
Sierra Way 017-020-050 Other GU N/A Water Recovery Site Oct 2008 $369,955 $1.00 Aug 2015 Successor Agency N/A Alleviate Blight 22.37 M-1 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 13 Historic Strand Theatre 188 North “L” St. 017-121-018 Public Building FD N/A See LRPMP Text Mar 2011 5 $193,117 $1.00 Sep 2015 NDC Sale Comps TBD Alleviate Blight 0.26 C-2 $1.00 None N/A No No Yes No 14 Vacant Surabian Drive
Commercial / Industrial
Property
Surabian Dr
017-280-002 Vacant
Commercial /
Industrial
Property
FD N/A See LRPMP Text
Aug
2005 $513,463
$522,676 Sep 2015 NDC Sale Comps TBD Alleviate Blight

11.66 M-1
$522,676 None N/A No No Yes No
017-280-020 Jul 2005 $711,032 8.93 C-4
1 Real Property in Fee, unless otherwise noted 2 See Exhibit “F” for Assessor Parcel Maps 3 Local factors that may affect land value were not taken into consideration. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary greatly from the ECV. The ECV is only a planning number and may not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. 4 See Exhibit “G” for zoning information 5 Staff continues to search records for acquisition date C-2 – Downtown Commercial District C-4 – General Commercial District CAC – County Auditor controller EO – Enforceable Obligation on approved ROPS FD – Future Development GU – Government Use M-1 – Light Industrial District N/A – Not applicable RCO – Recreational Open Space TE – Taxing Entities TBD – To Be Determined Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan September 2015
Amended November 2015
6 I. Introduction
LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN: PROPERTY INVENTORY DATA Site Data Property Value/Sale Info Other Property Information HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2) HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A)

SALE OF

10.00 M-1
$1,668,169 None N/A No No Yes No
017-320-001 9.41 017-320-003 9.66017-020-041 May
2005 $472,264 19.69 RCO 017-020-042 9.10 C-4
017-020-047 June 2005 $155,273 9.46 M-1 017-020-051 Oct 2008 $141,069 8.53 17 Vacant Avenue 412
Industrial Property
Avenue 412 017-020-049
Vacant
Industrial
Property
Sell EO or to CAC for TE Sell Oct 2008 $51,764 $312,276 Sep 2015 NDC Sale Comps TBD Alleviate Blight 3.13 M-1 $312,276 None N/A No No Yes No 18 Vacant S. “L” Street
Commercial Property
220 S. “L” Street 017-141-010
Vacant
Commercial
Property
Sell EO or to CAC for TE Sell Jun 2010 $65,180 Aug 2015 NDC Sale Comps TBD Alleviate Blight 0.36 C-2 $312,276 None N/A No No Yes No 19 Vacant El Monte Way
Commercial Property
El Monte Way
014-063-034 Vacant
Commercial
Property
EO Measure “R” EO Apr 2011 $0.00 $52,877 Sep 2015 TBD TBD Alleviate Blight

0.12 C-4 $52,877 None N/A No No Yes No 014-063-035 0.12 014-063-036 0.16 014-063-037 0.13
1 Real Property in Fee, unless otherwise noted 2 See Exhibit “F” for Assessor Parcel Maps 3 Local factors that may affect land value were not taken into consideration. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary greatly from the ECV. The ECV is only a planning number and may not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. 4 See Exhibit “G” for zoning information 5 Staff continues to search records for acquisition date C-2 – Downtown Commercial District C-4 – General Commercial District CAC – County Auditor controller EO – Enforceable Obligation on approved ROPS FD – Future Development GU – Government Use M-1 – Light Industrial District N/A – Not applicable RCO – Recreational Open Space TE – Taxing Entities TBD – To Be Determined Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
7 III. Property to be Transferred for Government Use
III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
8 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use
Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
Address:

APN:
168 S. “L” Street
017-122-011
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 1 is the Dinuba Police Community Service Office (the “Police Service Office”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Police Service Office was acquired by the Agency in August 1999, and carries a Book Value of $70,000. The Police Service Office was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Police Service Office is $1.00.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
9 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use
Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Police Service Office consists of one (1) 0.09-acre parcel (APN 017-122-011) located at 168 S. “L” Street. The Property contains a 1-story building that is approximately 1,200 sf.

The Police Service Office is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2). The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan.

These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the Police Service Office is based on its current use as a public building, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Police Service Office.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Police Service Office.2

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Police Service Office.

The transfer of the Police Service Office to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to maintain a police presence within the downtown.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Police Service Office.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Police Service Office is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

2 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=168+south+l+street%2C+dinuba%2C+ca Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
10 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 1 – Dinuba Police Community Service Office
J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Police Service Office to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 2: Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
11 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 2 – Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
Address:

APN:
180 W. Merced Street
017-133-09

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 2: Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
12 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 2 – Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 2 is the Dinuba Transit Center (the “DTC”) is a local agency administrative building and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the DTC was acquired by the Agency in January 2002 and carries a Book Value of $205,000. The DTC was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the DTC is $1.00.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The DTC consists of one (1) 0.69-acre parcel (APN 017-133-009) located at 180 W. Merced Street.

The Property contains a 1-story building that is approximately 6,000 sf and landscaping/parking lot that is approximately 24,000 sf. The DTC is a local agency administrative building wherein the following services are administered: bus transit services, 1st Time Homebuyer Program assistance, Housing Rehabilitation Program assistance, utility payments center, cooling center, free Wi-Fi, and Park & Ride.

The DTC is zoned General Commercial District (C-4). The C-4 land use designation applies to establishments engaged in servicing equipment, materials and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembly, pack-aging or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale. Land requirements for most general commercial uses generally dictates its application along arterial streets of the city which generally lie close to central commercial and industrial districts.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the DTC is based on its current use as a public building, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the DTC.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the DTC.3 G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the DTC.

The transfer of the DTC to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to establish a public transit center.

3 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=180+w+merced+st+dinuba+ca Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 2: Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
13 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 2 – Dinuba Transit Center
(a local agency administrative building)
H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the DTC.

I. Disposition of Property:

The DTC is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the DTC to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
14 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
Address:

APN:

Ventura Street
017-300-025
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 3 is the Ventura Street Right-of-Way (the “ROW”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the ROW was acquired by the Agency in February 2002 and carries a Book Value of $10. The ROW was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
15 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the ROW is $1.00. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Ventura Street Right-of-Way
APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-300-025 Feb 2002 $10 017-300-008
C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The ROW consists of one (1) 0.14-acre parcel (APN 017-300-025) located at the intersection of Ventura Street and S. M Street. The ROW is proposed to be used as right-of-way for the realignment of Ventura Street in conjunction with an at-grade railroad crossing. In addition, the ROW is a non-conforming under-sized lot that does not comply with the M-1 zoning standards.

The ROW is zoned Light Industrial (M-1). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the ROW is based on its use as right-of-way for the realignment of Ventura Street in conjunction with an at-grade railroad crossing. Since the minimum lot size in the M-1 zone is 1 acre, the ROW has no economic development value, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the ROW.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the ROW.4 G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the ROW.

The transfer of the ROW to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to realign Ventura Street in conjunction with an at-grade railroad crossing.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the ROW.

I. Disposition of Property:

The ROW is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).
4 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=ventura+street+%26+m+street+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
16 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 3: Ventura Street Right-of-Way
J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the ROW to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

APN:

N. “L” Street
017-121-025
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 4 is Shopper’s Alley Walkway Park (the “Walkway Park”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Walkway Park was acquired by the Agency in January 1995, and carries a Book Value of $18,865. The Walkway Park was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Walkway Park is $1.00.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 4: Shopper’s Alley Walkway Park
18 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 4: Shopper’s Alley Walkway Park
On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Walkway Park consists of one (1) 0.08-acre parcel (APN 017-121-025) located on N. “L” Street, approximately 460 feet southeast of E. Fresno Street. The Walkway Park contains street lamps, planter, trees, and paving stones. It is used as a public park/gathering plaza and a walkway that serves several local businesses as well as general access to the public for parking lots located on N. “K” Street.

The Walkway Park is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2). The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan. These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community. In addition, the Walkway Park is a non-conforming lot size and therefore it is not possible to develop the property.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the Walkway Park is based on its current use as a public park/gathering plaza and a walkway, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Walkway Park.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Walkway Park.5

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Walkway Park.

The transfer of the Walkway Park to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to maintain a public park/gathering plaza and a walkway that serves several local businesses as well as access to parking lots located on N. “K” Street and to continue to maintain the circulation pattern for parking and pedestrian traffic.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Walkway Park. 5 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=L+Street+%26+fresno+street+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 4: Shopper’s Alley Walkway Park
19 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 4: Shopper’s Alley Walkway Park
I. Disposition of Property:

The Walkway Park is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Walkway Park to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
20 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
Address:

APNs:

Kamm Avenue
017-210-016
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 5 is the Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site (the “Water Well Site”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Water Well Site was acquired by the Agency in July 1991 and carries a Book Value of $16,956. The Water Well Site was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Water Well Site is $1.00.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
21 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-210-016 Jul 1991 $16,956 017-021-003
On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Water Well Site consists of one (1) 0.05-acre parcel (APN 017-210-016) located on Kamm Avenue, approximately 450 feet east of S. Alta Avenue. The Water Well Site occupies the southeast corner of Wilson Elementary School.

Water Well Site is zoned Resource Conservation, Public Use and Open Space District (RCO). The RCO land use designation is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in areas of the community which exhibit scenic qualities, recreation potential, and which are designated as open space, school, ponding basin, or public facility by the general plan. In addition, the Water Well Site is a non-conforming under-sized lot that does not comply with the development standards of the Municipal Code.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

Based on the Water Well Site’s current use as a City well site, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be is $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Water Well Site.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Water Well Site.6

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Water Well Site.

The transfer of the Water Well Site to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and Successor Agency to divest the Successor Agency from ownership of a City water well site.
6 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Kamm+Ave+%26+Greene+Ave+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
22 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 5: Kamm Avenue City Water Well Site
H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Water Well Site.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Water Well Site is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Water Well Site to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
23 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
Address:

APNs:
201 N. Uruapan Drive
017-202-015 017-202-019
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 6 is the Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility (the “Community Park Sportsplex”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
24 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Community Park Sportsplex was acquired by the Agency in May 2009 and carries a Book Value of $403,442. The Community Park Sportsplex was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Community Park Sportsplex is $1.00. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-202-015 May 2009 $403,442 017-202-015
017-202-019 017-201-004
C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Community Park Sportsplex consists of two (2) parcels (APNs: 017-201-004, -015) totaling

1.70 acres, located at 201 N. Uruapan Drive. The Community Park Sportsplex, which was originally a warehouse, is now a 44,000 square foot venue where community members can stay active together and have fun. The Sportsplex contains restrooms, an office, a skate park, an arcade area, a ping pong table, three softball batting cages, three baseball batting cages and two multipurpose courts for basketball and volleyball. The artificial turf can be used for soccer, football, baseball or softball pitching, hitting, and infield instructional training.

The Community Park Sportsplex is zoned Light Industrial (M-1). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV of the Community Park Sportsplex is based on its current use as public park building, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Community Park Sportsplex.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Community Park Sportsplex.7

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Community Park Sportsplex.

The transfer of the Community Park Sportsplex to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to continue to invest in the community by maintaining the City’s recreational opportunities.
7 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=201+N.+Uruapan+Drive+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
25 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 6: Dinuba Community Park Sportsplex Facility
H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Community Park Sportsplex.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Community Park Sportsplex is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Community Park Sportsplex to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
26 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
Address:

APNs:
189 N. Perry Avenue
014-171-006
157 N. Perry Avenue
014-171-008
259 N. Perry Avenue
014-171-012
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
27 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 7 is Rose Ann Vuich Park Property (the “Vuich Park Property”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Vuich Park Property was acquired by the Agency in several separate transactions and carries a total Book Value of $504,444. The Vuich Park Property was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vuich Park Property is $1.00. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 014-141-006 Jul 2005 $179,732 ---
014-141-008 Aug 2005 $173,474 ---
014-141-012 Jan 2008 $151,238 ---
On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vuich Park Property consists of three (3) parcels (APNs: 014-171-006, -008, -012) totaling

0.46 acres and located at 157, 189, and 259 N. Perry Avenue. These parcels are part of a larger land assembly project being conducted by the City that will ultimately expand Rose Ann Vuich Park to 10.75 acres.

The Vuich Park Property is zoned Resource Conservation, Public Use and Open Space District (RCO). The RCO land use designation is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in areas of the community which exhibit scenic qualities, recreation potential, and which are designated as open space, school, ponding basin, or public facility by the general plan.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the Vuich Park Property is based on its current use as a park, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vuich Park Property.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
28 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 7: Rose Ann Vuich Park Property
F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

APN 014-171-008
The gas station at the corner of Perry Avenue and Avenue 416 was cited for leaking underground storage tank (“LUST”).8
As a result, the remediation work plan called for groundwater and soil vapor monitoring to occur. APN 014-171-008 contains two (2) groundwater monitoring wells and several soil vapor extraction points. The latest findings (September 16, 2015) show that there is no risk from vapor intrusion to nearby residences during AS/SVE system operations.9

APN 014-171-006
014-171-012
There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with APNs 014-171- 006, -012.

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Vuich Park Property.

The transfer of the Vuich Park Property to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to continue to invest in the community by maintaining and expanding the City’s Resource Conservation District’s recreational opportunities.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vuich Park Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Vuich Park Property is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Vuich Park Property to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City. 8 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0610700350&mytab=esidata#esidata 9 Soil Vapor Survey Report – Gas N Save – 108 East El Monte Way (at Perry Avenue), Wayne Perry, Inc., Environmental Remediation and Consulting, September 16, 2015,
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
29 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
Address:

APNs:
290 California
Avenue
018-042-001
320 California
Avenue
018-042-002
350 California
Avenue
018-042-004
366 California
Avenue
018-042-005
388 California
Avenue
018-042-005
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
30 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 8 is the Roosevelt Park Property and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Roosevelt Park Property was acquired by the Agency in several separate transactions and carries a total Book Value of $383,548. The Roosevelt Park Property was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Roosevelt Park Property is $1.00. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Roosevelt Park Property
APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 018-042-001 Aug 2003 $50,920 ---
018-042-002 Jun 2001 $65,481 ---
018-042-004 Mar 2005 $95,000 ---
018-042-005 Apr 2008 $126,272 ---
018-042-006 May 2002 $45,875 ---
On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Roosevelt Park Property consists of five (5) parcels (APNs: 018-042-001, -002, -004, -005, - 006) totaling 0.67 acres and located at 290, 320, 350, 366, and 388 California Street. These parcels are part of a larger land assembly project being conducted by the City that will ultimately expand the Park to 6 acres.

The Roosevelt Park Property is zoned Resource Conservation, Public Use and Open Space District (RCO). The RCO land use designation is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in areas of the community which exhibit scenic qualities, recreation potential, and which are designated as open space, school, ponding basin, or public facility by the general plan.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the Roosevelt Park Property is based on its current use as a park, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Roosevelt Park Property.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
31 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 8: Roosevelt Park Property
F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Roosevelt Park Property.10
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Roosevelt Park Property.

The transfer of the Roosevelt Park Property to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to continue to invest in the community by maintaining and expanding the City’s Resource Conservation District’s recreational opportunities.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Roosevelt Park Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Roosevelt Park Property is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Roosevelt Park Property to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City. 10 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=350+California+Avenue+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
32 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
Address:

APNs:

S. “L” Street
017-141-007
017-141-014
017-141-015
288 S “M” Street
017-144-009
289 S. “L” Street
017-144-003
017-144-004
017-144-005
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
33 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 9 is the Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza (the “Entertainment Park Plaza”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Entertainment Park Plaza was acquired by the Agency in several separate transactions and carries a total Book Value of $352,776. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-141-007 Nov 1998 $39,171 ---
017-141-014 017-141-008
017-141-010 Jun 2010 $65,180 ---
017-144-003 Jun 1987 $8,086 017-014-003
017-014-004
017-144-004 * $240,338 ---
017-144-005 * ---
017-144-009 Aug 2004 $1.00 ---
* Staff continues to search records for acquisition date On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

On March 27, 2012, pursuant to Successor Agency Resolution 2012-03, the Successor Agency accepted the transfer of real property from the City of Dinuba, thereby commencing the recovery process of the real property originally owned by the former Redevelopment Agency The Entertainment Park Plaza was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Successor Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Entertainment Park Plaza is $1.00.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
34 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Entertainment Park Plaza consists of seven (7) parcels (APNs: 017-141-007, -010, -014 and 017-144-009, -003, -004, -005) totaling 1.38 acres and located at 220 and 289 S. “L” Street and 288 S. “M” Street. These parcels are part of a larger land assembly project that will expand the use and development of the Entertainment Park Plaza into an area of the City that will concentrate on community entertainment venues. The Entertainment Park consists of two facilities: (i) the Park Plaza; and (ii) two (2) non-contiguous public parking lots. The Entertainment Park Plaza currently consists of a public park plaza, skate park and parking lots, and privately owned movie theater, bowling alley, restaurants and museum. The Successor Agency owns and maintains the public: (i) parking lots – one paved lot and one dirt lot; (ii) Skate Park; and (iii) park plaza grounds.

The Entertainment Park Plaza is located in the City’s Central Business District (the “CBD”) and is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2) and General Commercial District (C-4). The CBD designation is a section of the city which is the principal shopping, commerce area and focal point of many individual stores and businesses individually owned and/or operated. The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan. These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community. The C-4 land use designation applies to establishments engaged in servicing equipment, materials and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembly, pack-aging or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale. Land requirements for most general commercial uses generally dictates its application along arterial streets of the city which generally lie close to central commercial and industrial districts.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

Since no fees are charged for the use of the park plaza, or the parking lots of the Entertainment Park Plaza, the Successor Agency has determined the ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Entertainment Park Plaza.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

APN 017-144-00911
In June 2003, a Phase-I Environmental Assessment was completed. As a result, an underground storage tank was located and removed; the tank had not bottom. Spoil contamination was detected and soil removal and sampling was initiated. In August 2003, a site assessment work plan was approved. In October 2003, drilling and sail sampling took place. After the assessment of the data, in January 2004, additional drilling and sampling was ordered/conducted. In January 2004, an Update Site Assessment Summary – 288 South “M” Street – Dinuba, California was prepared by Krazan & Associates, Inc. The report concluded and recommended the following:
11 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0610725070 Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
35 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
“Based on detectable concentration of PHCs in the January 5, 2004 down gradient groundwater sample, it appears groundwater has been impacted by the former UST contents. The lateral extent of impacted groundwater has not been defined and was not part of the scope of this updated site assessment. The nearest municipal water well is approximately 2,000 feet southwest from the site, and it does not appear at this time that PHCs from the subject site pose a threat to this well. Krazan recommends additional groundwater assessment is conducted based on the TCDEHS [Tulare County Department of Environmental Health Services] and RWQCB [Regional Water Quality Control Board] review of this report.” In March 2004, a groundwater assessment work plan was approved. In December 2007, with no funds available for assessment/monitoring/remediation and with the State Water Quality Control Board approval, the city decided not to implement to 2004 wok plan and leave the site vacant for 20 year +/- and continue groundwater sampling until safe limits of contamination have been achieved.

In November 2013, Krazan & Associates, Inc. prepared and submitted the June 2013 Second SemiAnnual Groundwater Monitoring Event Report. The TCEHSD approved the report and strongly encouraged the City to move toward site remediation with in situ air sparging with concurrent soil vapor extraction. In January 2014, Krazan & Associates, Inc. submitted a Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test Work Plan to the TCEHSD. In late January, the TCEHSD approved the work plan.

The City continues to search for grants in order to move the remediation and required continued monitoring forward.

APN 017-141-007, -014, -010
017-144-003, -004, 005
There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with APNs: 014-141- 007, -014, -010 and 017-144-003, -004, -005.

G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Entertainment Park Plaza.

The transfer of the Entertainment Park Plaza to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to continue to (i) invest in the community by maintaining City’s entertainment and recreational opportunities; (ii) continuation and expansion of the City’s greenbelt; and (iii) achieve and maintain a balance between parking supply and demand.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Entertainment Park Plaza.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
36 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 9: Dinuba Entertainment Park Plaza
I. Disposition of Property:

The Entertainment Park Plaza is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Entertainment Park Plaza to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
37 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
Address:

APN:
1591 W. Sierra Way
017-030-025
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 10 is Centennial Park and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
38 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Centennial Park Property was acquired by the Agency in February 1998, and carries a Book Value of $100,301. The Centennial Park Property was acquired in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Centennial Park is $1.00.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Centennial Park Property consists of one (1) 1.00-acre parcel (APN 017-030-025) located at 1591 W. Sierra Way.

The Centennial Park Property is zoned Light Industrial (M-1). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the Centennial Park Property is based on its current use as a park and the location of the Dinuba 1-million gallon Water Tower, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E):

There are no site revenues generated from the Centennial Park Property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination ((HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Centennial Park Property.12
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Centennial Park Property.

The transfer of the Centennial Park Property to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to continue to invest in the community by maintaining City’s recreational opportunities.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Centennial Park Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Centennial Park Property is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba, at no cost, for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

12 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=1591+W.+Sierra+Way+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
39 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 10: Centennial Park Property
J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer the Centennial Park Property to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 11: N. “K” Street Parking Lot
40 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 11 – N. “K” Street Parking Lot
Address:

APNs:

N. “K” Street
017-121-004
017-121-023
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 11 is the N. “K” Street Parking Lot (the “Parking Lot”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Parking Lot was acquired by the Agency February 1992 and January 1995, and carries a total Book Value of $87,250. The Parking Lot was acquired by the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 11: N. “K” Street Parking Lot
41 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 11 – N. “K” Street Parking Lot
Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight by assembling land and preparing property for future development. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Parking Lot is approximately $1.00.

On March 8, 2011, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2011-12, the City of Dinuba approved the acquisition of real property from the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency. On March 27, 2012, pursuant to City Council Resolution 2012-20, the City of Dinuba approved the reversal of said acquisition.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Parking Lot consists of two (2) parcels (APNs 017-121-004, -023) totaling 0.37 acres located on N. “K” Street, approximately 500 feet southeast of N. Fresno Street.

The Parking Lot is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2). The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan. These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

No fees are charged for the use of the Parking Lot and therefore, the maintenance of the Parking Lot is borne by the Successor Agency, causing a negative cash flow scenario. Since the Parking Lot is used without charge and has a negative cash flow, the Parking Lot’s ECV has been determined by the Successor Agency to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Parking Lot.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Parking Lot.13 G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a Transit Oriented Development in conjunction with the Parking Lot.

The transfer of the Parking Lot to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency and the City to (i) continue to achieve and maintain a balance between parking supply and demand; and (ii) continue to serve the parking needs of the public.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There are no development proposals and activity in conjunction with Parking Lot. 13 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=s+k+street+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 11: N. “K” Street Parking Lot
42 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 11 – N. “K” Street Parking Lot
I. Disposition of Property:

The Parking Lot is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba at no cost for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the Parking Lot to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 12: Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
43 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 12 – Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
Address:

APNs:
1,200 feet South of Avenue 412
017-020-050

A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 12 is the Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property (the “GRR Property”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 12: Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
44 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 12 – Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the GRR Property was acquired by the Agency in October 2008, and carries a Book Value of $369,955. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-020-050 Oct 2008 $369,955 017-020-034
017-020-039
The GRR Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of the City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the GRR Property is $1.00.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The GRR Property consists of one (1) 22.37-acre parcel (APN 017-020-050) located 1,200 feet south of Avenue 412 and a ¼ of a mile east of Road 74. The GRR consists of inlets, two (2) retention basins, four (4) pumping wells, a storage tank, and an office building.

The GRR Property is located in the Light Industrial District (M-1). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

The ECV for the GRR Property is based on its current use as a City groundwater recharge/recovery facility, and therefore, the Successor Agency has determined its ECV to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the GRR property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the GRR Property.14
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with the GRR Property.

The transfer of the GRR Property to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the City and the Successor Agency to divest the Successor Agency from ownership of a City water facility site.

14 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Avenue+412+%26+Road+74+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 12: Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
45 III. Property to be Transferred for Governmental Use Site No. 12 – Groundwater Recharge/Recovery Property
H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development and activity in conjunction with the GRR Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The GRR Property is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba at no cost for governmental use pursuant to HSC § 34181 (a).

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. It is intended that the transfer of the GRR Property to the City of Dinuba will take place upon the earlier occurrence of: (i) DOF’s approval of the LRPMP; or (ii) DOF’s approval of a resolution specifically authorizing the transfer. The transfer will occur at no cost to the City.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
46 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development IV. Property to be Transferred for Future
Development
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 13: Historic Strand Theatre
47 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 13 – Historic Strand Theatre
Address:

APN:
188 N. “L” Street
017-121-018
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 13 is the Historic Strand Theatre (the “Strand Theatre”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for future development (i.e., use as a government facility), at no charge, pursuant to HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2). The Successor Agency believes this use is fully consistent with the intent of HSC § 34181(a).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 13: Historic Strand Theatre
48 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 13 – Historic Strand Theatre
B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

Property records indicate that the Strand Theatre was acquired by the Agency15 and carries a Book Value of $193,117. The Strand Theatre was acquired by the Agency in order to alleviate physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Strand Theatre is $1.00.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Strand Theatre consists of one (1) 0.26-acre parcel (APN 017-121-018). Located on the southeast corner of “L” and Fresno Streets at 188 NB. “L” Street, the Strand Theatre (known in later years as the State Theatre) opened for business on February 3, 1924. As one of the largest buildings in the City at the time, it has been a landmark ever since, although it has been vacant for a number of years. The Strand Theatre is a 10,000 sf multi-story theatre and was stripped of most tenant improvements by the former owner of the building prior to the Agency’s acquisition.

The Strand Theatre is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2). The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan. These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine an ECV for the Strand Theatre, in September 2015, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective.16 No comparable were located for the Strand Theatre. The ECV was determined to be $1.00.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Strand Theatre and the maintenance of the building and grounds is borne by the Successor Agency.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Strand Theatre.17
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):
15 Staff continues to search records for acquisition date 16 www.ndcdata.com 17 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=188+N.+%93L%94+Street+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 13: Historic Strand Theatre
49 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 13 – Historic Strand Theatre
There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Strand Theatre.

The transfer of the Strand Theatre for future development to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency in accordance with the Agency’s Five-Year 2005/2006 through 2009/2010 Implementation Plan that directs the Agency to rehabilitate the Strand Theatre.18 In addition to the Agency’s Five-Year 2005/2006 through 2009/2010 Implementation Plan objective, the transfer of the Strand Theatre for future development to the City of Dinuba will provide (i) a perceivable reduction in blight through new construction and infrastructure; (ii) for the expansion of public facilities that support the community; (iii) public facilities located to efficiently serve the community and are compatible with surrounding land uses and to assure the least intrusive and most compatible integration of related buildings and facilities into the land use pattern of the community; and (iv) availability of sites for the development and expansion of City offices.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous history of development proposal or activities in conjunction with the Strand Theatre.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Strand Theatre is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for governmental use pursuant to HSC §34181(a), at no cost to the City for the reasons stated above.

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP. The transfer of the Strand Theatre to the City of Dinuba will occur only after the LRPMP is approved by the DOF and at no cost to the City.

For property to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for future development, implementation will include securing an HSC § 34180 (f)(1) compensation agreement (the “Compensation Agreement”) with the affected taxing entities prior to the transfer of the property to the City. The City will seek a Compensation Agreement with the affected taxing entities after the LRPMP is approved by DOF.

The compensation due the affected taxing entities shall be governed by the Compensations Agreement.
18 Dinuba Redevelopment Agency Five Year 2005‐2‐2009 Implementation Pan, page 10 Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 14: Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property 50 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 14 – Vacant Surabian Drive Commercail / Industrial Property Address:

APNs:

Surabian Drive
017-280-002
017-280-020
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 14 is the Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property (the “Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for future development pursuant to HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2).

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 14: Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property 51 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 14 – Vacant Surabian Drive Commercail / Industrial Property B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in July and August 2005, and carries a total Book Value of $1,224,495. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-280-002 Jul 2005 $513,463 017-030-034
017-280-020 Aug 2005 $711,032 017-030-031
The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is approximately $522,676.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property consists of two (2) parcels (APNs: 017-280-002, - 020) totaling 20.59 acres located on Surabian Drive approximately 1,500 feet east of Monte Vista Drive.

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is located in the Light Industrial District (M-1) and General Commercial District (C-4). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

The C-4 land use designation applies to establishments engaged in servicing equipment, materials and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembly, pack-aging or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale. Land requirements for most general commercial uses generally dictates its application along arterial streets of the city which generally lie close to central commercial and industrial districts.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine the ECV for the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective.

No comparable sales were located for properties zoned commercial and/or industrial. As a result, comparable sales were used for properties zoned agricultural. The ECV was determined to be approximately $522,676.

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 14: Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property 52 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 14 – Vacant Surabian Drive Commercail / Industrial Property estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.19
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

The transfer of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property for future development to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency in accordance with the City’s 2011 West El Monte Way Master Development Plan that directs specific uses of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property for: (i) Park or Green Space; (ii) Residential – High; (iii) Commercial – General; and (iv) Light Industrial.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

It is proposed that an RFP will be issued in accordance with the City’s policies and procedures for property disposition located in Exhibit “A” Section II.

The ECV of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is approximately $522,676.

The following process was used in determining the ECV of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property:

Date of estimated current value – September 2015
Value Basis – The ECV was determined by a comparable sales analysis using the National Data Collective subscription service. The ECV is approximately $522,676.

Local factors that may affect land value were not taken into consideration. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary greatly from the ECV. The ECV is only a planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. 19 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Avenue+412+%26+Road+74+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 14: Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property 53 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 14 – Vacant Surabian Drive Commercail / Industrial Property Proposed sale date – TBD
Proposed sale value – TBD
J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

The compensation due the affected taxing entities shall be governed by the Compensations Agreement.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 15: Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
54 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 15 – Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
Address:

APN:

Road 74
017-020-001
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 15 is the Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property (the “Vacant Industrial Property”) and is proposed to be transferred to the City of Dinuba for future development pursuant to HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Vacant Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency20 and carries a Book Value of $1,313,298. The Vacant Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the 20 Staff continues to search records for acquisition date Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 15: Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
55 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 15 – Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is approximately $507,699.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vacant Industrial Property consists of one (1) 20.00-acre parcel (APN: 017-020-001) located on Road 74 approximately Surabian Drive approximately 1,000 feet South of Avenue 412.

The Vacant Industrial Property is located in the Light Industrial District (M-1). The M-l land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine the ECV for the Vacant Industrial Property, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective. No comparable sales were located for properties zoned industrial. As a result, comparable sales were used for properties zoned agricultural. The ECV was determined to be approximately $507,699.

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vacant Industrial Property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Vacant Industrial Property.21
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Vacant Industrial Property.

The transfer of the Vacant Industrial Property for future development to the City of Dinuba advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency in accordance with the Agency’s Five- 21 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Avenue+412+%26+Road+74+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 15: Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
56 IV. Property to be Transferred for Future Development Site No. 15 – Vacant Road 74 Industrial Property
Year 2005-2009 Implementation Plan that directs the continued development of the Industrial Park in accordance with the Southwest Dinuba Specific Plan.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vacant Industrial Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

It is proposed that an RFP will be issued in accordance with the City’s policies and procedures for property disposition located in Exhibit “A” Section II.

The ECV of the Vacant Industrial Property is approximately $507,699.

The following process was used in determining the ECV of the Vacant Industrial Property:

Proposed sale date – TBD
Proposed sale value – TBD
J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

The compensation due the affected taxing entities shall be governed by the Compensations Agreement.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
57 V. Property to be Sold
V. Property to be Sold
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 16: Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property 58 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 16 - Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property Address:

APNs:

Avenue 412
017-273-001
017-320-001
017-320-003
017-020-041
017-020-042
017-020-047
017-020-051
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 16: Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property 59 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 16 - Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 16 is the Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property (the “Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property”) and is proposed to be sold by the Successor Agency.

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in several transactions and carries a total Book Value of $1,119,124. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-273-001
017-320-001 Aug 1996 $350,000 017-020-045
017-320-003
017-020-041 May 2005 $472,782 --- 017-020-042
017-020-047 June 2005 $155,273 017-020-44
017-020-051 Oct 2008 $141,069 017-020-033
017-020-034
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 16: Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property 60 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 16 - Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is approximately $1,668,169.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property consists of seven (7) parcels (APNs: 017-273-001; 017-320-001, -003; 017-020-041, -042, -047, -051) totaling 66.75 acres located on the north by Avenue 412, on the east by S. Alta Avenue, on the south by Avenue 408 and on the west by Monte Vista Drive.

The Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is located in three (3) zoning districts: (i) the Light Industrial District (M-1) in which this land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities; (ii) General Commercial District (C-4) in which this land use designation applies to establishments engaged in servicing equipment, materials and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembly, pack-aging or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale; and (iv) Resource Conservation, Public Use and Open Space District (RCO) in which this land use designation is intended to provide for permanent open spaces in areas of the community which exhibit scenic qualities, recreation potential, and which are designated as open space, school, ponding basin, or public facility by the general plan.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine the ECV for the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective.

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 16: Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property 61 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 16 - Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.22
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

Selling the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency and the City to develop and revitalize this area of the community through the creation of opportunities for private investment in the City.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Successor Agency proposes to sell the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property in accordance with the Successor Agency’s policies and procedures for property disposition as shown in Exhibit “A” Section I. Purchase and Sale Procedures.

The ECV of the Vacant Commercial / Industrial Property is approximately $1,668,169.

Proposed sale date – TBD and subject to the Successor Agency’s implementation of its policies and procedures for property disposition as shown in Exhibit “A.” Proposed sale value – TBD and subject to a fair market appraisal conducted by a licensed appraiser.

The Successor Agency notes that in the environment of AB 1484, it may not be possible to achieve appraised values. The Successor Agency will be in charge of the process seeking to achieve successful marketing of properties, and will act with reasonable diligence. However, the constraints and environment of AB 1484 militate against maximizing prices. The actual sales prices to be realized will be a function of what a willing buyer is willing to pay under circumstances where 22 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Avenue+412+%26+Road+74+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 16: Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property 62 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 16 - Vacant Avenue 412 Commercial / Industrial Property there will be no seller financing and dispositions will be subject to Oversight Board approval. There is no reason to think that book values will be realized.

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

For properties to be sold, implementation will include distribution of any land sales proceeds for enforceable obligations and/or distributed as property tax to the taxing entities. Due to the vagaries associated with the sale of land, such as uncertainties concerning the timing of sale and the price that would be realized, it is not feasible to precisely state in the LRPMP how the funds will be used.

In that regard, once an agreement is reached with respect to the purchase and sale of a property, the agreement will be presented to the Oversight Board for concurrence. The Oversight Board’s approval will be evidenced by a resolution that will be submitted to DOF and, per the HSC, is subject to DOF’s review. That resolution will include or refer to a staff report which describes with greater particularity, once more facts are known, how the proceeds of sale will be distributed. As noted in Section I – Introduction of the LRPMP, the LRPMP provides that proceeds of the sale may be used for enforceable obligations and/or distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller. The need to retain some or all of the proceeds of sale for enforceable obligations will depend on whether there is a short-fall in RPTTF in the ROPS cycle during which the escrow is anticipated to close. If a short-fall were to occur in the RPTTF at that time, then all or a portion of the sale proceeds should be used to fulfill an enforceable obligation with any remaining sale proceeds then distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller. If there is not a short-fall in RPTTF at the time of close of escrow, then land sale proceeds would be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller in a manner described at the time of Oversight Board approval as to a particular property sale. Since it is impossible to foresee when and if a short-fall in the RPTTF may occur, or when the property will be sold, the use of the sale proceeds cannot be specifically determined at this time and, therefore, cannot be stated with greater particularity in the LRPMP.

However, it is clear that at the time a sale takes place, the sale will be brought back to the Oversight Board and will be subject to review.

APN:

Avenue 412
017-020-049
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 17 is the Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property (the “Vacant Industrial Property”) and is proposed to be sold by the Successor Agency.

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Vacant Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in October 2008 and carries a Book Value of $51,764. The following table details the property records:

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 17: Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
64 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 17 - Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
Acquisition Details of the Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial / Industrial Property APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 017-020-049 Oct 2008 $51,764 017-020-039
The Vacant Industrial Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vacant Industrial Property is approximately $312,276.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vacant Industrial Property consists of one (1) 3.13-acre parcel (APN: 017-020-049) and is locate on the southeast corner of Avenue 412 and Monte Vista Drive.

The Vacant Industrial Property is located in the Light Industrial District (M-1). The M-1 land use designation applies to areas designated light industrial on the general plan for various types of less intense industrial plants and related activities.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vacant Industrial Property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Vacant Industrial Property.23
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Vacant Industrial Property.

Selling the Vacant Industrial Property advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency and the City to develop and revitalize this area of the community through the creation of opportunities for private investment in the City.
23 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Avenue+412+%26+Road+74+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 17: Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
65 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 17 - Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vacant Industrial Property.

I. Disposition of Property:

The Successor Agency proposes to sell the Vacant Industrial Property in accordance with the Successor Agency’s policies and procedures for property disposition as shown in Exhibit “A” Section I. Purchase and Sale Procedures.

The ECV of the Vacant Industrial Property is approximately $312,276.

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

In that regard, once an agreement is reached with respect to the purchase and sale of a property, the agreement will be presented to the Oversight Board for concurrence. The Oversight Board’s approval will be evidenced by a resolution that will be submitted to DOF and, per the HSC, is Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 17: Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
66 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 17 - Vacant Avenue 412 Industrial Property
subject to DOF’s review. That resolution will include or refer to a staff report which describes with greater particularity, once more facts are known, how the proceeds of sale will be distributed. As noted in Section I – Introduction of the LRPMP, the LRPMP provides that proceeds of the sale may be used for enforceable obligations and/or distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller. The need to retain some or all of the proceeds of sale for enforceable obligations will depend on whether there is a short-fall in RPTTF in the ROPS cycle during which the escrow is anticipated to close. If a short-fall were to occur in the RPTTF at that time, then all or a portion of the sale proceeds should be used to fulfill an enforceable obligation with any remaining sale proceeds then distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller. If there is not a short-fall in RPTTF at the time of close of escrow, then land sale proceeds would be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller in a manner described at the time of Oversight Board approval as to a particular property sale. Since it is impossible to foresee when and if a short-fall in the RPTTF may occur, or when the property will be sold, the use of the sale proceeds cannot be specifically determined at this time and, therefore, cannot be stated with greater particularity in the LRPMP.

However, it is clear that at the time a sale takes place, the sale will be brought back to the Oversight Board and will be subject to review.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 18: Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
67 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 18 - Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
Address:

APN:
220 S. “L” Street
017-141-010
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 18 is the Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property (the “Vacant Commercial Property”) and is proposed to be sold by the Successor Agency.

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Vacant Commercial Property was acquired by the Agency in June 2010 and carries a Book Value of $65,180.

The Vacant Commercial Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 18: Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
68 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 18 - Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Vacant Commercial Property is approximately $36,000.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Vacant Commercial Property consists of one (1) 0.36-acre parcel (APN: 017-141-010) and is locate at 220 S. “L” Street.

The Vacant Commercial Property is zoned Downtown Commercial District (C-2). The C-2 land use designation applies to the commercial core of the city, as may be designated by the general plan. These areas constitute the primary commercial district of the community where a wide range of retail, financial, governmental, professional, business service and entertainment activities and uses are encouraged to concentrate to serve the entire community.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine the ECV for the Vacant Commercial Property, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective. The ECV was determined to be approximately $36,000.

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Vacant Commercial Property.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial Property.24
G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Vacant Commercial Property.

Selling the Vacant Commercial Property advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency and the City to develop and revitalize this area of the community through the creation of opportunities for private investment in the City.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals and activity in conjunction with the Vacant Commercial Property.
24 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0610725070 Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 18: Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
69 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 18 - Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
I. Disposition of Property:

The Successor Agency proposes to sell the Vacant Commercial Property in accordance with the Successor Agency’s policies and procedures for property disposition as shown in Exhibit “A” Section I. Purchase and Sale Procedures.

The ECV of the Vacant Commercial Property is approximately $36,000.

Date of estimated current value – November 2015
Value Basis – The ECV was determined by a comparable sales analysis using the National Data Collective subscription service. The ECV is approximately $36,000.

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

In that regard, once an agreement is reached with respect to the purchase and sale of a property, the agreement will be presented to the Oversight Board for concurrence. The Oversight Board’s approval will be evidenced by a resolution that will be submitted to DOF and, per the HSC, is subject to DOF’s review. That resolution will include or refer to a staff report which describes with greater particularity, once more facts are known, how the proceeds of sale will be distributed. As noted in Section I – Introduction of the LRPMP, the LRPMP provides that proceeds of the sale may be used for enforceable obligations and/or distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 18: Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
70 V. Property to be Sold
Site No. 18 - Vacant S. “L” Street Commercial Property
the County Auditor-Controller. The need to retain some or all of the proceeds of sale for enforceable obligations will depend on whether there is a short-fall in RPTTF in the ROPS cycle during which the escrow is anticipated to close. If a short-fall were to occur in the RPTTF at that time, then all or a portion of the sale proceeds should be used to fulfill an enforceable obligation with any remaining sale proceeds then distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller. If there is not a short-fall in RPTTF at the time of close of escrow, then land sale proceeds would be distributed as property tax to the taxing entities through the County Auditor-Controller in a manner described at the time of Oversight Board approval as to a particular property sale. Since it is impossible to foresee when and if a short-fall in the RPTTF may occur, or when the property will be sold, the use of the sale proceeds cannot be specifically determined at this time and, therefore, cannot be stated with greater particularity in the LRPMP.

However, it is clear that at the time a sale takes place, the sale will be brought back to the Oversight Board and will be subject to review.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
71 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 19: Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
72 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
Site No. 19 - Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
Address:

APNs:

El Monte Way
014-063-034
014-063-035
014-063-036
014-063-037
A. Permissible Use (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(2)):

Site No. 18 is the Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property (the “Property”) and per the “Agreement - Transfer of Real Property - County of Tulare to City of Dinuba Redevelopment Agency,” dated April 5, 2011, the Property is to be sold by the Successor Agency to Pablo M. and Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 19: Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
73 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
Site No. 19 - Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
Ana M. Contreras, private individuals (the “Buyer”), in order to fulfill an enforceable obligation pursuant to HSC § 34191.5 (c) (2).

B. Acquisition of Property (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(A) and § 34191.5 (c)(1)(B)):

The Property was acquired by the Agency in April 2011 from the County of Tulare (the “County”) pursuant to the “Agreement - Transfer of Real Property - County of Tulare to City of Dinuba Redevelopment Agency,” (the “2011-Agreement”) dated April 5, 2011. In effect, the County transferred the Property to the Agency, at no cost to the Agency, with the provision that any future land sales proceeds would be returned to the County’s Measure “R” program. Therefore, pursuant to the 2011-Agreement, the Property is a financial asset of the County’s Measure “R” program.

The Property carries a total Book Value of $0.00. The following table details the property records:

Acquisition Details of the Vacant Surabian Drive Commercial /Commercial Property APN Acquisition Date Book Value Original APNs as Acquired by Agency 014-063-034
April 2011 $0.00
014-063-023
014-063-035 014-063-024
014-063-036 014-063-022
014-063-037 014-063-028
The Property was acquired by the Agency in order to meet the revitalization goals of City and the Agency to alleviate the existence and spread of physical and economic blight while jointly participating with the County of Tulare, and its Measure “R” program, to widen El Monte Way and obtain additional right-of-way. The estimated current value (the “ECV”) of the Property is approximately $52,877.

C. Site Information (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(C)):

The Property consists of four (4) parcels (APNs: 014-063-034, -035, -036, -037) totaling 0.53 acres located on the north side of El Monte Way, approximately 300 feet east of N. Arkona Avenue.

The Property is zoned General Commercial District (C-4). The C-4 land use designation applies to establishments engaged in servicing equipment, materials and products, but which do not require the manufacturing, assembly, pack-aging or processing of articles or merchandise for distribution and retail sale. Land requirements for most general commercial uses generally dictates its application along arterial streets of the city which generally lie close to central commercial and industrial districts.

The 2011-Agreement establishes that (i) the County shall convey to the Property to the Agency; (ii) the Agency will agree to work with the Buyers to purchase the property; (iii) the Agency agrees that all proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used to further a Measure “R” regional road project; and (iv) the County shall retain a temporary construction easement over the Property.

D. Estimated Current Value (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(D)):

To determine the ECV for the Property, a comparable sales analysis was conducted by the Successor Agency in September 2015, through the National Data Collective. The ECV was determined to be approximately $52,877. However, it is the responsibility of the Successor Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 19: Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
74 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
Site No. 19 - Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
Agency, pursuant to the 2011-Agreement, to negotiate a selling price for the Property with the Buyer.

Local factors were not taken into consideration in determining the ECV of this site. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary significantly from the ECV. The ECV is only a rough estimate planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. The real value of the property cannot be determined without an appraisal.

E. Site Revenues (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(E)):

There are no site revenues generated from the Property and, pursuant to the 2011-Agreement, all proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be returned the Measure “R” fund and used to further a Measure “R” regional road project within the City of Dinuba.

F. History of Environmental Contamination (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(F)):

There is no history of environmental contamination or reports in conjunction with the Property.25 G. Potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) and the Advancement of Planning Objectives of the Successor Agency (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(G)):

There is no potential for a TOD in conjunction with Property.

To fulfill the enforceable obligation created by the 2011-Agreement advances the planning objectives of the Successor Agency and the City in that all proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be used to further a Measure “R” regional road project within the City of Dinuba.

H. History of Previous Development Proposals and Activity (HSC § 34191.5 (c)(1)(H)):

There is no history of previous development proposals or activity in conjunction with the Property other than the existing 2011-Agreement.

I. Disposition of Property:

Pursuant to the 2011-Agreement, the Successor Agency will sell the Property to the Buyer at a price still yet to be negotiated.

The ECV of the Property, as determined by the Successor Agency for LRPMP purposes only, is approximately $52,877.

Local factors that may affect land value were not taken into consideration. Therefore, the actual value of the property may vary greatly from the ECV. The ECV is only a planning number and should not be relied upon as a basis for actual value. 25 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=El+Monte+way+%26+arkona+dinuba%2C+ca+ Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
Site No. 19: Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
75 VI. Property to Fulfill an Enforceable Obligation
Site No. 19 - Vacant El Monte Way Commercial Property
Proposed sale date – TBD and subject to the Successor Agency’s negotiations with the Buyer.

Proposed sale value – TBD and subject to the Successor Agency’s negotiations with the Buyer.

J. Implementation of the Long-Range Property Management Plan:

Following the approval of the LRPMP by the DOF, the Successor Agency will implement the LRPMP.

Pursuant to the 2011-Agreement, all proceeds from the sale of the Property shall be returned to the Measure “R” fund and used to further a Measure “R” regional road project within the City of Dinuba.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
76 Exhibit A – Successor Agency/City Property
Disposition Procedures
The following is only a general outline for the disposition of property by the Successor Agency. It is anticipated that the Successor Agency may from time to time adopt policies and procedures that are more specific during the implementation phase of the LRPMP.

I. PURCHASE AND SALE PROCEDURES

1. Post notice on Successor Agency website:
“All persons interested in receiving solicitations for the disposition of Successor Agency property please email [email protected] with your contact information and “Purchase and Sale of Successor Agency Property” in the Subject line.”

2. Successor Agency will provide written solicitations for the sale of its real estate assets, which may be a single parcel or a grouping of parcels (the “Property”). Such formal solicitations will include, but not be limited to:
a. APN(s)
b. Property location
c. Zoning
d. Acreage
e. Listing Price (The listing price shall either be (i) not less than fair market value under an appraisal procured by the Successor agency or (ii) another amount approved for such purpose by the Oversight Board
f. Purchase Price shall be all cash at close of escrow, no seller financing. g. Deadline to receive offers (prior to selection, offers are confidential) h. Offer submittal guidelines:
i. All offers must be in writing (California Association of Realtor forms are acceptable); ii. Successor Agency will provide courtesy to brokers equal to one-half of the customary commission if the ultimate buyer is represented by said real estate broker as buyer’s broker at the time the original offer is submitted.
iii. Provided that allowance of brokerage commissions will be subject to Oversight Board approval in each case and paid from the sale proceeds;
iv. Approval of each sale may be subject to DOF approval; v. Type of financing identified (i.e., buyer’s cash, buyer’s loan proceeds, etc.); vi. All buyers are to be listed – no silent partners; and vii. Offers will be reviewed for conflict of interest between offeror and Successor Agency/City officials, staff and consultants.
i. Some properties for sale consist of multiple parcels. Only offers that include all parcels identified by Successor Agency on a particular site may be accepted, i.e., no less than whole purchases.

3. Method of Solicitations:
a. Property posting
b. Successor Agency website posting
c. Local real estate brokers
d. All persons requesting solicitations
e. Workshops and/or e-mail notifications

4. All property sales are in an “AS IS, WHERE IS” condition.

5. The Successor Agency will be reimbursed from the sale proceeds of the property for any costs related to the appraisal, escrow and title fees (cost of CLTA policy with premium based upon sales price), broker fees, and any other costs associated with the sale.

6. An offer may be rejected if it does not meet the Successor Agency’s price threshold. Acceptance of a purchase and sale offer is subject to approval of the Successor Agency’s Board of Directors.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
77 7. The City shall have a right of first refusal in connection with the purchase of property. In the event a submittal is received, such right of first refusal may be exercised by means of the City: (i) notifying the Oversight Board and the party which made an offer (in either order) of the City’s intention to acquire the property for monetary consideration in an amount equal to or greater than that offered by the offering party, and (ii) obtaining confirmation of such purchase by the Oversight Board.

8. The City shall have an option to purchase property based upon values agreed to by the Oversight Board.

The option may be exercised as to one or more properties at a time or times of the City’s choosing.

9. If the City determines that it is infeasible to otherwise market and dispose of certain properties, the Successor Agency may auction such property or properties at a time or times consented to by the Oversight Board.

II. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCEDURES
Costs incurred by the Successor Agency and/or the City in the implementation of these Disposition Procedures shall be treated as an Enforceable Obligation for purposes of the Recognized Obligation Payments Schedule (“ROPS”) of the Successor Agency to be recovered from land sales proceeds. The City shall provide the Successor Agency an estimate of such costs at such times and in a form sufficient for the Successor Agency to include such costs on one or more ROPS, as appropriate. Included in such costs are:
staff time in the performance of such duties; costs and fees of consultants, attorneys, appraisers, title insurers and escrow; costs and fees in connection with the disposition of property(ies), such as unpaid and outstanding tax liens or judgments and other costs incurred in order to deliver merchantable title. Where possible, the Successor Agency is to recover costs at the time of close of escrow.

A) INTENT AND PURPOSE
A Request for Proposals (“RFP”) will be prepared by the Successor Agency and posted to the City’s website, and/or sent to developers or parties that have requested such RFPs, and other developers or parties at the Successor Agency’s discretion. The number of properties as to which an RFP is requested is subject to the discretion of the Successor Agency.

B) PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

1. Interested parties may submit a development proposal by the deadline specified in the RFP or other announcement.

2. Proposal requirements may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. The proposed total consideration for the property(ies) and information supporting the offer price;
b. Any proposed alterations to the terms and conditions of sale; c. Construction and development pro forma, a detailed site plan, a business/operating plan, developer qualifications, experience and references, a narrative description of the market support for the proposed project, an operating pro forma, as applicable, and an explanation of the economic benefits of the proposed project to the City, other affected taxing agencies and the community;
d. The proposed uses are to conform to the requirements, intent, goals, and objectives of the City General Plan/Zoning Ordinance, other applicable development standards, and other applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes and regulations.
e. A statement that no financial assistance is being requested from any governmental agency in connection with the proposal, or a statement that financial assistance is being requested from a governmental agency in connection with the proposal, indicating the amount that will be requested, the anticipated timing for consideration of such request, and a description of any discretionary process required by the governmental agency from which assistance will be requested, together with an acknowledgment that conditioning a proposal upon receipt of assistance form a governmental agency may result in the rejection of such proposal;

3. Interested parties to provide such additional information as may be requested in good faith by Successor Agency.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
78 4. Subsequent to review, applicants will be advised regarding the development proposals submitted complying with the requirements of the RFP or whether additional information is required.

C) PROPOSAL REVIEW

1. The Successor Agency will review all proposals received and determined by Successor Agency staff to be complete.

2. Among other things, the Successor Agency’s review will consider the value of the asset in question being maximized as well as the proposal furthering the objectives of the Successor Agency’s General Plan and not negatively impacting property interest of landowners holding property near the asset in question.

3. Nothing in these Procedures prohibits the Successor Agency or the City from requiring information that is in addition to the foregoing or obligates the Successor Agency in selecting any proposal.

Neither the City nor the Successor Agency will bear any responsibility for the costs associated with preparing and submitting a proposal.

D) NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS
The Successor Agency may enter into an Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement (“ERNA”) with a selected project proponent. The purpose of the ERNA is to establish a time period during which the chosen applicant shall have the right to negotiate with the Successor Agency the terms and conditions of a sales and development contract. Therefore, a Disposition and Development Agreement may follow the ERNA if applicable.

E) ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPOSITION
The City shall have a right of first refusal in connection with the purchase of property. In the event a submittal is received, such right of first refusal may be exercised by means of the City: (i) notifying the Oversight Board and the party which made an offer (in either order) of the City’s intention to acquire the property for monetary consideration in an amount equal to or greater than that offered by the offering party, and (ii) obtaining confirmation of such purchase by the Oversight Board.

The City shall have an option to purchase property based upon values agreed to by the Oversight Board.

The option may be exercised as to one or more properties at a time or times of the City’s choosing.

If the City determines that it is infeasible to otherwise market and dispose of certain properties, the Successor Agency may auction such property or properties at a time or times consented to by the Oversight Board.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
79 Exhibit B – Health & Safety Code
HSC § 34191.1, reads as follows:

The provisions of this chapter shall apply to a City
upon that agency's receipt of a finding of completion
by the Department of Finance pursuant to Section
34179.7.

HSC § 34191.3, reads as follows:

Notwithstanding Section 34191.1, the requirements
specified in subdivision (e) of Section 34177 and
subdivision (a) of Section 34181 shall be suspended,
except as those provisions apply to the transfers for
governmental use, until the Department of Finance has
approved a long-range property management plan
pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.5, at
which point the plan shall govern, and supersede all
other provisions relating to, the disposition and use of the real property assets of the former redevelopment
agency. If the department has not approved a plan by
January 1, 2015, subdivision (e) of Section 34177 and
subdivision (a) of Section 34181 shall be operative
with respect to that City.

HSC § 34191.4, reads as follows:

The following provisions shall apply to any City that
has been issued a finding of completion by the
Department of Finance:
(a) All real property and interests in real property
identified in subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of
subdivision (c) of Section 34179.5 shall be
transferred to the Community Redevelopment
Property Trust Fund of the City upon approval by
the Department of Finance of the long-range
property management plan submitted by the City
pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 34191.7
unless that property is subject to the requirements
of any existing enforceable obligation.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding subdivision (d) of Section
34171, upon application by the City and approval
by the oversight board, loan agreements entered
into between the redevelopment agency and the
city, county, or city and county that created by the
redevelopment agency shall be deemed to be
enforceable obligations provided that the
oversight board makes a finding that the loan was
for legitimate redevelopment purposes.
(2) If the oversight board finds that the loan is an
enforceable obligation, the accumulated interest
on the remaining principal amount of the loan
shall be recalculated from origination at the
interest rate earned by funds deposited into the
Local Agency Investment Fund. The loan shall
be repaid to the city, county, or city and county in
accordance with a defined schedule over a
reasonable term of years at an interest rate not to
exceed the interest rate earned by funds deposited
into the Local Agency Investment Fund. The
annual loan repayments provided for in the
recognized obligations payment schedules shall
be subject to all of the following limitations:
(A) Loan repayments shall not be made prior
to the 2013-14 fiscal year. Beginning in the
2013-14 fiscal year, the maximum repayment
amount authorized each fiscal year for
repayments made pursuant to this subdivision
and paragraph (7) of subdivision (e) of
Section 34176 combined shall be equal to
one-half of the increase between the amount
distributed to the taxing entities pursuant to
paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section
34183 in that fiscal year and the amount
distributed to taxing entities pursuant to that
paragraph in the 2012-13 base year. Loan or
deferral repayments made pursuant to this
subdivision shall be second in priority to
amounts to be repaid pursuant to paragraph
(7) of subdivision (e) of Section 34176.
(B) Repayments received by the city, county
or city and county that formed the
redevelopment agency shall first be used to
retire any outstanding amounts borrowed and
owed to the Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund of the former redevelopment
agency for purposes of the Supplemental
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund
and shall be distributed to the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund
established by subdivision (d) of Section
34176.
(C) Twenty percent of any loan repayment
shall be deducted from the loan repayment
amount and shall be transferred to the Low
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
80 and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund,
after all outstanding loans from the Low and
Moderate Income Housing Fund for purposes
of the Supplemental Educational Revenue
Augmentation Fund have been paid.
(c) (1) Bond proceeds derived from bonds issued on
or before December 31, 2010, shall be used for the
purposes for which the bonds were sold.
(2) (A) Notwithstanding Section 34177.3 or any
other conflicting provision of law, bond
proceeds in excess of the amounts needed to
satisfy approved enforceable obligations
shall thereafter be expended in a manner
consistent with the original bond covenants.

Enforceable obligations may be satisfied by
the creation of reserves for projects that are
the subject of the enforceable obligation and
that are consistent with the contractual
obligations for those projects, or by
expending funds to complete the projects.

An expenditure made pursuant to this
paragraph shall constitute the creation of
excess bond proceeds obligations to be paid
from the excess proceeds. Excess bond
proceeds obligations shall be listed separately
on the Recognized Obligation Payment
Schedule submitted by the City.
(B) If remaining bond proceeds cannot be
spent in a manner consistent with the bond
covenants pursuant to subparagraph (A), the
proceeds shall be used to defease the bonds
or to purchase those same outstanding bonds
on the open market for cancellation
HSC § 34191.5, reads as follows:
(a) There is hereby established a Community
Redevelopment Property Trust Fund, administered by
the City, to serve as the repository of the former
redevelopment agency's real properties identified in
subparagraph (C) of paragraph (5) of subdivision (c)
of Section 34179.5.
(b) The City shall prepare a long-range property
management plan that Address the disposition and use
of the real properties of the former redevelopment
agency. The report shall be submitted to the oversight
board and the Department of Finance for approval no
later than six months following the issuance to the City of the finding of completion.
(c) The long-range property management plan shall do
all of the following:
(1) Include an inventory of all properties in the
trust. The inventory shall consist of all of the
following information:
(A) The date of the acquisition of the property
and the value of the property at that time, and
an estimate of the current value of the
property.
(B) The purpose for which the property was
acquired.
(C) Parcel data, including address, lot size,
and current zoning in the former agency
redevelopment plan or specific, community,
or general plan.
(D) An estimate of the current value of the
parcel including, if available, any appraisal
information.
(E) An estimate of any lease, rental, or any
other revenues generated by the property, and
a description of the contractual requirements
for the disposition of those funds.
(F) The history of environmental
contamination, including designation as a
brownfield site, any related environmental
studies, and history of any remediation
efforts.
(G) A description of the property's potential
for transit-oriented development and the
advancement of the planning objectives of
the City.
(H) A brief history of previous development
proposals and activity, including the rental or
lease of property.
(2) Address the use or disposition of all of the
properties in the trust. Permissible uses include
the retention of the property for governmental use
pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 34181, the
retention of the property for future development,
the sale of the property, or the use of the property
to fulfill an enforceable obligation. The plan shall
separately identify and list properties in the trust
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
81 dedicated to governmental use purposes and
properties retained for purposes of fulfilling an
enforceable obligation. With respect to the use or
disposition of all other properties, all of the
following shall apply:
(A) If the plan directs the use or liquidation
of the property for a project identified in an
approved redevelopment plan, the property
shall transfer to the city, county, or city and
county.
(B) If the plan directs the liquidation of the
property or the use of revenues generated
from the property, such as lease or parking
revenues, for any purpose other than to fulfill
an enforceable obligation or other than that
specified in subparagraph (A), the proceeds
from the sale shall be distributed as property
tax to the taxing entities.
(C) Property shall not be transferred to a City,
city, county, or city and county, unless the
long-range property management plan has
been approved by the oversight board and the
Department of Finance.

Note: HSC § 34191.2 does not exist and
therefore is not included above.

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
82 Exhibit C – DOF Finding Of Completion

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
84 Exhibit D – Resolution of the Successor Agency Board

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
88 Exhibit E – Resolution of the Oversight Board

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
94 Exhibit F – Assessor Parcel Maps
12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01712_0.png

Page 1 of 2 ends

9/1/2015 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01711_0.png

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01712_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01721_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01720_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01417_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01804_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01714_0.png

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01712_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01702_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01712_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01728_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01702_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01702_0.png

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01702_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01714_0.png 12

Page 1 of 1 ends

/28/2013 https://www.ndcdata.com/search/maps/06107_01406_0.png Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
Long-Range Property Management Plan
September 2015
Amended November 2015
108
Exhibit G – Zoning Information
Avenue 400
Road 74
North
Avenue 404
Euclid
Road 62
Villa
Davis
Road 70
El Monte
Bates
Eaton
Avenue 426
Avenue 430
Avenue 406
Uruapan
Newton
Avenue 428
Alice
Millard
Avenue 422
Road 66
Merced
Gerald
Greene
Yale
Northridge
Golden
Nichols
Vermont
Saginaw
Kelly
Cara
Whittaker
Arno
Short
Surabian
Dickey
Mono
Lillie
Linzmeier
Elizabeth
Milsap
Road 75
Roe
Wayside
Hayes
Adelaide
Bolinger
Pederson
Grace
Gladys
Griggs
Peony
Whitney
Marks
Franzen
Lyndsay
Exie
Samantha
Hollow
Gloria
Arkona
La Vista
Lindera
Bloomingdale
Auto Mall
Mckinley
Violet
Katelyn
Charles
Brent
Holden
Rene
Pacific Circle
Jeffrey
Flake
Snyder
Briarwood
Arla
Morningside
Echo
Ramblewood
Michelle
K mi berly
Tiwood
Payan
Cherie Ann
Reina
Red Robin
Malsch Strasse
Umbrella
Dewhirst
Bryan
Corey
Ryrie
Caile
Terrace
Road 80
Adelaide
Thomas
Pamela
Avenue 412
Sycamore
Lincoln
Sunset
Saginaw
Sierra
Hayes
Marks
Ventura
North
Johnson
Evans
Buena Vista
Vassar
Laurel
Avenue 408
Road 92
Lyndsay
Nichols
Road 64
Nichols
1st
Villa
Wr gi ht
Monte Vista
Kelly
Eaton
Sierra
Whitney
Avenue 404
College
Randle
Smith
Kern
Fresno
Franklin
Avenue 424
H
Garden
Cedar
Myrtle
L
Linzmeier
Fresno
I
Sierra
Nancy
Millwood
Ramblewood
Sierra
Avenue 430
Terrace
Road 72
Inyo
M
2nd
North
Pa ml
Park
Princeton
Bel Aire
Arkona
Road 56
Amador
Buena Vista
Marshall
Saginaw
Perry
Ramblewood
Q
Sue
Road 76
Whittaker
Road 74
Avenue 424
Adelaide
J
Union
Avenue 426
Roberts
Olive
Hayes
Christopher
Avenue 430
Ventura
Marion
Road 68
Marks
Kern
College
Tulare
California
Mckinley
Avenue 412
Crawford
Academy
Mariposa
Whitney
Lois
Sequoia
Mountain View
K
Avenue 420
Lincoln
Mckinley
Road 88
Franklin
Kelly
Wilson
2nd
P
Magnolia
H
California
Lindara
Suzanne
Penny
Roberts
Hayes
Avenue 412
Lindera
Hollow
Adelaide
Mono
(unnamed)
Northridge
Arkona
Second
K mi berly
Johnson
Rob ni
Akers
Lincoln
O
Alta
Cedar
Ve mr ont
Road 92
Harvard
Lyndsa
A
y
delaide
Road 68
Meadow
El Monte
El Monte
Road 64
Road 68
Road 72
Alta
Crawford
Road 64
Road 68
Road 72
Alta
Crawford
Kamm
Nebraska
Kamm
Nebraska
City of Dinuba
Zone Plan
C i t y O r d i n a n c e 1 7 . 0 3 . 0 2 0
Path: L:\Projects\2005\051029\GIS\Zoning_Map_revised_24x36 11-11-2012.mxd Date: 11/29/2012 °
Last amendment: September 2011
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
City LimitsSphere of InfluenceParcels
Zoning
(AN) Agriculture(C-1) Neighborhood Commercial(C-2) Downtown Commercial(C-3) Community Commercial(C-3P) Community Commercial (Precise Plan Overlay)(C-4) General Commercial(C-4P) General Commercial (Precise Plan Overlay)(M-1) Light Industrial(M-2) Heavy Industrial(PB) Park/Ponding Basin(PO) Professional Office(PO-P) Professional Office (Precise Plan Overlay)(PP) Parking (Precise Plan Overlay)(R-1-6) One-Family Residential(R-1-6P) One-Family Residential (Precise Plan Overlay)(R-1-6PUD) One-Family Residential (Planned Unit Development)(R-1-7.5) One-Family Residential(R-1-10) One-Family Residential(R-A) Residential Acreage(RCO) Resource Conservation(RM-1.5) Multi-Family Residential(RM-1.5P) Multi-Family Residential (Precise Plan Overlay)(RM-2) Multi-Family Residential(RM-2P) Multi-Family Residential (Precise Plan Overlay)(RM-3) Multi-Family Residential(RM-3P) Multi-Family Residential (Precise Plan Overlay) !((
!((
!((
(!(
Road 56
Nebraska Ave.

El Monte Ave.

Kamm Ave.

Englehart Ave
Road 56
Road 64
Road 68
Alta Ave.

Crawford Ave.

Road 96
D e l f t D e l f t
C o l o n y C o l o n y
Nebraska Ave
El Monte Ave.

Kamm Ave.

Englehart Ave
Road 64
Road 68
Alta Ave.

Crawford Ave.

Road 96
d 104
R C R
P r o j e c t
S m i t h S m i t h
M t n . M t n .

F r e s n o C o u n t y L i n e F r e s n o C o u n t y L i n e F r e s n o C o u n t y L i n e F r e s n o C o u n t y L i n e Union Pacific Railroad
Saginaw Ave
Sierra Way
Saginaw Ave
Sierra Way
Ave 400 Ave 400
Floral Ave
Travers Creek
Travers Canal
RD 144
RD 56
RD 104
RD 74
RD 64
RD 96
RD 84
AVE 404
RD 70
RD 62
AVE 428
FLORAL
RD 68
AVE 396
RD 100

DAVIS DR
AVE 426

NORTH WY
RD 76
AVE 412
AVE 430
AVE 406
S L ST
RD 92
S O ST
AVE 412-SIERRA WY
AVE 422
RD 66

EATON AVE
S J ST

VILLA AVE
S I ST

SEQUOIA DR

BATES AVE

PARK WY

NEWTON AVE

LILIE AVE
S P ST

FIRST AVE

GOLDEN WY
SMITH

KERN ST

MAGNOLIA WY

E FRESNO ST

ALICE AVE

MILLARD WY

W MERCED ST
AVE 397

OLIVE WY

NICHOLS DR

GERALD AVE

NORTHRIDGE DR

ACADEMY WY
S Q ST

SECOND AVE

WHITAKER WY

W KERN ST

YALE AVE

WHITNEY WY

MYRTLE AVE

LINZMEIR WY

PERRY AVE

CARA RD

GREEN AVE
RD 57

W MONO ST

ELIZABETH WY

WAYSIDE DR

RANDLE AVE

EDWARDS PL

SHORT AVE

LINDARA AVE

TERRACE DR

MILSAP AVE

W MARIPOSA ST

HARVARD AVE

W KELLY DR

DICKEY ST

HAYES AVE

VASSAR AVE

AKERS WY

LAWRENCE AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

MEADOW LN

PRINCETON AVE

CEDAR LN

MARK DR

LINDSAY WY

W FRANKLIN WY

GRACE LN

BOLLINGER WY

GREENE ST

N LYN DSAY WY

ROE AVE

MARSHALL AVE

BEL AIRE

MILLWOOD DR

FRANZEN WY

WHITNEY AVE

GLADYS AVE

MOUNTAIN VIEW WY
RD 1 0 3

LOIS LN

KELLY DR

EXIE LN

PAYAN AVE

SUE AVE

W ADELAIDE WY

W PAMELA LN

COURT AVE

ROBERT PL

BLO OMINGDALE WY

LA VISTA AVE

ROYAL GARNET

PAYNE AVE

GRIGGS AVE

GLORIA AVE

ADELAIDE WY
VILLA

GARDEN AVE

W NORTH WY

EUCLID CI

MCKINLEY AVE

VERMONT AVE

PACIFIC CIRCLE DR

E HOLLOW WAY

SUNSET WY

HOLLOW WY

HAYES AV

RENE CT

RAMBLEWOOD DR

COLLEGE LN

KATELYN AVE

NANCY CT

MICHELLE DR

CALIFORNIA AVE

ALEXANDRA DR

CHERIE ANN AVE

W VENTURA ST

MCKINLEY CT

PALM WY

ARLA AVE

REINA AVE

UMBRELLA ST

LAUREL DR

RAMBLEWOOD DR
S P ST
AVE 426

PARK WY
AVE 396
RD 68
AVE 404

HAYES AVE
AVE 430

OLIVE WY

W FRANKLIN WY

NORTH WY

MCKINLEY AVE
E
M
E
E
°
City of Dinuba
Legend
1,100 0 1,100 550
Feet

0.25 0.125 0 0.25
Miles
City Limits
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area Boundary
Urban Development Boundaries
10 Year
20 Year
Collectors
Arterials
County Boundary
Gateways
Commercial - Central District
Commercial - Community
Commercial - General
Commercial - Neighborhood
Professional Office
Residential - Low
Residential - Medium Low
Residential - Medium
Residential - Medium High
Residential - High
Light Industrial
Industrial Reserve
Urban Reserve
Public/Semi-Public
Green Belt
Park/Ponding Basin
D i a g r a m
Land Use and Circulation
Last amendment: September 2011
S Future school site, school site
locations are approximate and
subject to change.

General Plan
S:\Base Maps\California\Counties\Tulare County\Cities\Dinuba\Dinuba_GeneralPlan_Adopted.mxd-DD -1-
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-48

RESOLUTION OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF

THE CITY OF DINUBA AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY

ASSETS FROM THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF DINUBA TO THE CITY OF DINUBA, AND APPROVING CERTAIN RELATED

ACTIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code (the “HSC”) § 34172 (a) (1), the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba was dissolved on February 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, consistent with the provisions of the HSC, the City Council of the City of Dinuba previously elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba (the “Successor Agency”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to HSC § 34179, the Successor Agency previously established the “Dinuba Oversight Board” to assist in the wind-down of the former redevelopment agency through June 30, 2018, at which time it was dissolved by operation of law; and WHEREAS, consistent with HSC § 34179 (j), on July 1, 2018 the Tulare Countywide Oversight Board (the “CWOB”) was established to assist in winding-down the dissolved redevelopment agencies within the County of Tulare; and WHEREAS, at the time of dissolution, the former redevelopment agency held several real property assets that had been acquired for redevelopment purposes; and WHEREAS, as a part of redevelopment dissolution process, successor agencies with real property assets are required to dispose of such real property pursuant to a Long-Range Property Management Plan (the “LRPMP”) approved by the California Department of Finance (the “DOF”); and
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2015, the Successor Agency submitted its Dinuba Oversight Board-approved revised LRPMP to the DOF, which was subsequently revised at the request of DOF and resubmitted to DOF on December 23, 2015; and WHEREAS, on December 31, 2015, the DOF approved the Successor Agency’s LRPMP and notified the Successor Agency that pursuant to HSC § 34191.3, the approved LRPMP shall govern, and supersede all other provisions relating to the disposition and use of all the real property assets of the former redevelopment agency (the “DOF Determination”); and WHEREAS, the approved LRPMP, which addresses the disposition and use of the real property assets held by the Successor Agency, includes 42 parcels of land, divided among 19 separate sites, 12 of which were designated for “Government Use”, three (3) of which were designated for “Future Development”, three (3) of which were designated “For Sale” and one (1) of which was subject to an “Enforceable Obligation” (reference the sites and parcels summary provided on pages 4 Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5-6 of the LRPMP); and -2-
WHEREAS, the sites designated for Government Use were previously transferred to the City; the sites designated for Future Development are pending transfer to the City; the sites designated for sale will remain in the ownership of the Successor Agency until transferred to third-party buyers in the future; and the site subject to an Enforceable Obligation was transferred to a buyer; and
WHEREAS, the Future Development designated Sites are identified within the LRPMP as Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017-121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017-020-001 [Site No. 15]; and
WHEREAS, the LRPMP requires that the Future Development designed Sites be transferred to the City (reference pages 47 through 56 within the LRPMP) and designates the City as the responsible entity, in lieu of the Successor Agency, for the future disposition of the subject Sites designated for Future Development and for compliance with the applicable provisions of the HSC governing the future transfer of these Sites to third parties (the “City’s LRPMP Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, the City’s future disposition of LRPMP Future Development-designated real property Sites are not subject to review by the CWOB or DOF; and WHEREAS, the City’s responsibilities related to the disposition of the Future Development Sites includes, but are not limited to, acceptance of the transfer, management and oversight of escrow services, review of title reports, clearing-up of exceptions to title, resolving outstanding real property tax matters with the County, preparing, filing and recording appropriate documents related to the transfer of title or as may be reasonably required by the buyer or the title company, notary services, processing compensation agreements (or notices of compensation when property is sold for not less than market values) in the future for the purpose of proportionally dividing the net proceeds of sale among the affected taxing entities (which is anticipated to occur after the ultimate future sale of an LRPMP Property to third-party entities), management and accounting of the net proceeds of sale, including the payments to the Tulare County Auditor Controller and other related matters that are prerequisites to the close of escrow; and
WHEREAS, in addition, DOF has consistently confirmed: i) its expectation that the successor agencies transfer all of their remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development” within their LRPMPs to the entity that created their former and now dissolved redevelopment agencies; and ii) that a HSC § 34180 (f) (1) “Compensation Agreement” (or similar instrument) between the City and the taxing entities (as such taxing entities are defined in HSC § 34171 [k]) is not required as a prerequisite to the transfer of such real property assets to the City, as such agreement(s) may follow at a future time (the “DOF Confirmations); and
WHEREAS, consistent with the City’s LRPMP Obligations and DOF’s Confirmations, the Successor Agency Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5may transfer its remaining real property assets that are designated for -3-
“Future Development” within the LRPMP to the City, which are more particularly described within Exhibit “A” to this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, approval of this Resolution will authorize the transfer to the City of: i) all of the Successor Agency’s remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development”, at no cost via quitclaim deeds, the form of which is attached as Exhibit “B” to this Resolution; and ii) the obligation to fulfill the City’s LRPMP Obligations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code (the “GC”) § 54234 (b) and § 103 of the Surplus Land Act (the “SLA”) Guidelines promulgated by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “HCD”) dated as of April 2021 (the “Guidelines”), the Successor Agency’s transfer of the Property to the City consistent with the LRPMP and the DOF Determination is exempt from the California Surplus Land Act (GC §§ 54220, et seq.) if the transfer is completed by December 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, consistent with the foregoing recital, the City will be responsible for compliance with the SLA prior to the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution has been reviewed with respect to applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act (the “CEQA”), the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, § 15000 et seq., hereafter the “Guidelines”), and the City’s environmental guidelines; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution does not constitute a “project” for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines § 15378, because this Resolution is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per § 15378 (b) (5) of the Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, all of the prerequisites with respect to the approval of this Resolution have been met.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution.

2. The Successor Agency’s transfer to the City of: i) all of the Successor Agency’s remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development”, as described within Exhibit “A” to this Resolution, at no cost; ii) the obligation to fulfill the City’s LRPMP Obligations; and iii) the responsibility for compliance with the SLA prior to the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities, are approved.

3. On behalf of the Successor Agency, the City Manager, in the capacity as Executive Director of the Successor Agency, Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5or designee, is authorized and directed to execute the -4-
quitclaim deeds, the form of which is attached as Exhibit “B” to this Resolution, required to transfer the Successor Agency’s real property assets to the City, as described within Exhibit “A” to this Resolution, and to take such other actions and execute such other documents as are necessary as may otherwise be required to fulfill the intent of this Resolution including.

4. This Resolution is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines § 15378, because this Resolution is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, per § 15378 (b) (5) of the Guidelines.

5. This resolution shall take effect upon the date of its adoption.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 13th day of September, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: Board Members:

NOES: Board Members:

ABSTAIN: Board Members:

ABSENT: Board Members:

Linda Launer, Chairperson
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5 -5-
I, Maria Alaniz, City Clerk of the City of Dinuba, certify the foregoing is the full and true Resolution No. 2022-48 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba at a regular meeting held on September 13, 2022, by the above noted vote.

ATTEST:

Maria Alaniz, City Clerk Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5 -6-
EXHIBIT “A”
LRPMP

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT USE

REAL PROPERTY ASSETS
SITE NOs. APNs ADDRESS ACRES ZONING
13 017-121-018 Vacant 0.26 Downtown Commercial (C-2)
14 017-280-002 Vacant 20.59 General Commercial (C-4)
017-280-020 Light Industrial (M-1)
15 017-020-001 Vacant 20.00 Light Industrial (M-1) Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5 -7-
EXHIBIT “B”
Form of Quitclaim Deed
(Not for Signature)

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Dinuba
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Dinuba
405 E. El Monte Way
Dinuba, CA 93618
Attn: City Clerk
APNs:
(Space Above Line For Use By Recorder)
This document is exempt from the
payment of a recording fee pursuant to
Government Code Section 27383
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $NONE

QUITCLAIM DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba, a public body, corporate and politic (the “Grantor”) does hereby remise, release and quitclaim to the City of Dinuba, a California municipal corporation (the “Grantee”), any interest that Grantor may have in the real property in the City of Dinuba, County of Tulare, State of California, described in Attachment “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
DINUBA, a public body, corporate and politic
Dated By: NOT FOR SIGNATURE
Luis Patlan, Executive Director Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5 -8-
Attachment “A”
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Tulare, described as follows:

ADD LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE:

APN: 017-121-018
Lots 30-31-32 Block 27 (Full Description to Come)
APN: 017-280-002
Parcel 1 Parcel Map No. 4592, V46 P97 PM (Full Description to Come) APN: 017-280-020
Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No. 4922 PM 50-27 (Full Description to Come) APN: 017-020-001
Karnak VYD TR All Lt 6 (Full Description to Come) Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5 -9-
State of California } ss
County of Tulare }
On before me, ,
Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY of PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Signature of Notary) (This area for official notarial seal) A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5
-10-

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by written deed or grant dated , 2022 from the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency to the City of Dinuba, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the City of Dinuba, pursuant to authority conferred by the City of Dinuba on ____, 2022, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-48 and the City of Dinuba consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated this day of , 2022.

By: NOT FOR SIGNATURE
Luis Patlan City Manager
City of Dinuba
Provides for:

APN 017-121-018
APN 017-280-002
APN 017-280-020
APN 017-020-001 Neevia Document Converter Pro v6.5
-11-
State of California } ss
County of Tulare }
On before me, ,
Notary Public, personally appeared who proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and who acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and by his/her signature on the instrument the person, or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY of PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Resolution No. 2022-49 of the City Council of the City of Dinuba authorizing the acceptance of certain real property assets from the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba to the City of Dinuba, and approving certain related actions (DJ)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to adopt Resolution No. 2022-49, authorizing the acceptance of certain real property assets from the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba to the City of Dinuba, and approving certain related actions.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Resolution No. 2022-49 accepts the conditional and limited transfer of certain real property assets designated as “Future Development” Sites within the Successor Agency’s Long-Range Property Management Plan (the “LRPMP”) as Site Nos. 13, 14 and 15 (APNs 017-121-018 [Site No. 13], 017-280-002 & -020 [Site No. 14] and 017-020-001 [Site No. 15]; which was adopted by City Council in 2015, and the State of California Department of Finance (DOF) Determination (as described below), which designate and bind the City to implement the LRPMP on behalf of the Successor Agency through the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities. Acceptance of the subject property by City Council is required in order to complete the transfer of the property from the Successor Agency to the City of Dinuba.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Dinuba was dissolved on February 1, 2012. The City Council of the City of Dinuba previously elected to serve in the capacity of the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency previously established the “Dinuba Oversight Board” to assist in the wind-down of the former redevelopment agency through June 30, 2018, at which time it was dissolved by operation of law. On July 1, 2018 the Tulare County Oversight Board (CWOB) was established to assist in winding-down the dissolved redevelopment agencies within the County of Tulare.

At the time of dissolution, the former redevelopment agency held several real property assets that had been acquired for redevelopment purposes. As a part of redevelopment dissolution process, successor agencies with real property assets are required to dispose of such real property cnistent with a California Department of Finance (DOF) approved Long Range Property Management Plan (LRPMP), which is attached herein as 'Attachment A'. The approved (2015) LRPMP, which addresses the disposition and use of the real property assets held by the Successor Agency, includes 42 parcels of land, divided among 19 separate sites, 12 of which were designated for “Government Use”, three (3) of which were designated for “Future Development”, three (3) of which were designated “For Sale” and one (1) of which was subject to an “Enforceable Obligation” (reference the sites and parcels summary provided on pages 4-6 of the LRPMP).

The LRPMP requires that the Future Development designed Sites be transferred to the City (reference pages 47 through 56 within the LRPMP) and designates the City as the responsible entity, in lieu of the Successor Agency, for the future disposition of Sites designated for Future Development. Consistent with the City’s LRPMP Obligations and DOF’s confirmations, the Successor Agency may transfer its remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development” within the LRPMP to the City, which are more particularly described within Exhibit “A” to the attached Resolution 2022-49, which is attached herein as Attachment 'B', and that the City may process Compensation Agreements (or similar instruments) in the future, which is anticipated to occur when such real property assets are transferred to third-party entities.

Approval of the attached Resolution 2022-49 authorize and accepts the conditional and limited transfer to the City of: i) all of the Successor Agency’s remaining real property assets that are designated for “Future Development”, at no cost via quitclaim deeds, the form of which is attached as Exhibit “B” to the Resolution; and ii) the obligation to process Compensation Agreements (or similar instruments) in the future, when such real property assets are transferred to third-party entities. Approval of the attached Resolution also designates and binds the City to implement the LRPMP on behalf of the Successor Agency through the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities. This acceptance is also consistent with the provisions of the Surplus Land Act (SLA) Guidelines (California Government Code (the “GC”) § 54234 (b) and § 103 ) published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “HCD”) dated as of April 2021 (the “Guidelines”), if the transfer is completed by December 31, 2022. Upon approval of Resolution 2022-49, the City will be responsible for compliance with the SLA prior to the ultimate future sale of the Property to third-party entities.

Staff recommends Council adopt Resolution 2022-49 accepting the transfer of certain real property assets from the Successor Agency to the Dinuba Redevelopment Agency to the City of Dinuba, and authorize the City manager or designee to execute all related documents required to complete the transfer.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Long Range Prperty Management Plan (LRPMP)
B. 2022-49 Acceptance of transfer of real property from the SA to the City 2015 LONG RANGE PROPERTY