Cities Index.
Minutes

Dinuba City Council
October 25, 2022

Document
Minutes
Meeting
October 25, 2022
Body
Dinuba City Council
Original file
29.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on dinubaca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

October 25, 2022

MINUTES
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT:

Nerio-Guerrero, Longoria-via Zoom, Thusu, Reynosa, Launer COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT:

None.

STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:

Alaniz, Hernandez, Hurtado, Iriarte, James, Montejano, Patlan, Solis, Watts, Webster, Yanez

1. OPENING CEREMONIES

1.1. Welcome and Call to Order
Mayor Launer called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

1.2. Invocation
The invocation was led by Chaplain Susee.

1.3. Pledge of Allegiance
The pledge of allegiance was led by Police Chief Iriarte.

2. AGENDA CHANGES OR DELETIONS
To better accommodate members of the public or convenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed. Additions to Agenda may be added only pursuant to California Government Code section 54954.2(b).

None.

3. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for any person who would like to address the Council on any item that is not on the agenda. Please be advised that State law does not allow the City Council to discuss or take any action on any issue not on the agenda. The City Council may direct staff to follow up on such item(s). Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. If there is any person wishing to address the City Council at this time please approach the podium and state your name and nature of the request.

Angela Litman approached the podium to share information on the Hero's Project Dinuba. The project is inspired by banner projects within local communities and is meant to recognize heroes who have served and sacrificed during active duty. The banners will be displayed from May to November of 2023 with the help of the American Legion, the Chamber, and various other community service groups. Littman asked for the Council's support for this project.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.

4.1. SUBJECT
Notice of Completion - Stony Creek Development (JW)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept the Stony Creek Development public improvements as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the Tulare County Recorder's Office.

4.2. SUBJECT
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (MA)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve City Council meeting minutes of October 11, 2022 as presented.

4.3. SUBJECT
Ordinance No. 2022-11 (Montebella) Second reading and Adoption (Ksch) a

RECOMMENDATION
Council conduct the second reading, waive reading in full, and adopt Ordinance 2022-11 pertaining to a change of zoning on four parcels located on the west side of Englehart Avenue north of the SaginawAvenue alignment.

4.4. SUBJECT
20th Annual Veterans Dinner Sponsorship (MA)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to approve sponsorship in the amount of $500 for the 20th Annual Veterans Dinner to be held on November 3, 2022, at the Orosi Memorial Hall.

A motion was made by Council Member Thusu, second by Council Member Nerio-Guerrero, to review and approve as presented.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

5. WARRANT REGISTER

5.1. SUBJECT
Warrant Register October 14 & 21, 2022 (KS)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented.

A motion was made by Vice Mayor Reynosa, second by Council Member NerioGuerrero, to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

6. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

6.1. SUBJECT
Authorization to Purchase Entertainment Plaza Restroom (JW) a

RECOMMENDATION
Council authorize the Parks Director to purchase the Entertainment Plaza Restroom in amount of $163,505.00 from LB Foster.

City Engineer Jason Watts reported on the purchase of entertainment plaza restrooms. Watts stated the city staff evaluated several types of restrooms and chose the best fit for the area.

A motion was made by Vice Mayor Reynosa, second by Council Member Thusu, to authorize the Parks Director to purchase the Entertainment Plaza Restroom in the amount of $163,505.00 from LB Foster.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

6.2. SUBJECT
Cancellation or Rescheduling of November 8, 2022 City Council Meeting (MA)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to consider cancellation or rescheduling of the November 8, 2022, City Council meeting due to the general election.

City Clerk/Human Resources Director Alaniz presented that the City Council Meeting of November 8, 2022, be canceled or rescheduled due to this year's general election.

Mayor Launer asked if there would be any conflict in canceling both the November 8, 2022, City Council Meeting due to the election and the November 22, 2022, City Council Meeting due to the Thanksgiving Holiday. There are no conflicts expected according to staff.

A motion was made by Council Member Thusu, second by Council Member Nerio-Guerrero, to cancel the November 8, 2022, City Council Meeting due to the general election and the November 22, 2022, City Council Meeting due to the Thanksgiving Holiday.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

6.3. SUBJECT
Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee Donation to fund Commemorative Seating Area at Rose Ann Vuich Park (SH)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council receives information regarding a community donation in the amount of $4,000 from the Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee for the installation of a seating area at Rose Ann Vuich Park.

Joann Truite and Carol Meinert presented a brief history of the Dinuba/Malsh Sister City Committee and of the proposed project of a bench-seat area at Rose Ann Vuich Park. A presentation was shown of what the bench and the area would look like once the project is completed.

Director Hurtado added that it would also be a beatification item that would in the future include lighting. The bench area would serve as a friendship bench that is expected to enrich Rose Ann Vuich park.

Mrs. Truite added that this has been an ongoing project that includes many community members and city staff. Truite thanked the Council for their support.

A motion was made by Council Member Thusu, second by Council Member Nerio-Guerrero, to receive information regarding a community donation in the amount of $4,000 from the Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee for the installation of a seating area at Rose Ann Vuich Park.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

6.4. SUBJECT
Roundabout Feasibility Study (JW)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept staffs recommendation on starting the environmental and design process for a roundabout located at the intersection of Road 56 and El Monte Way (Avenue 416).

Jason Watts City Engineer presented the Roundabout Feasibility Study that included collaboration among the City of Dinuba, 4 Creeks, and TCAG. The study indicates that roundabouts can reduce and prevent vehicle collisions and fatalities within certain intersections around the City of Dinuba. Five intersections were identified, El Monte Way & Road 56, Alta Avenue & Avenue 400, El Monte Way & Road 92, Alta Avenue & Nebraska, and Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue.

Watts shared that the roundabout benefits discovered within the study were many including reduced conflict points where fatalities are reduced by 90%. A reduction of traffic congestion with less stop-and-go traffic, reduced operations and maintenance costs, and decreased air pollution, and the roundabout would serve to beautify the intersection.

Watts is requesting the council's direction in prioritizing the next roundabout project. Watts recommends El Monte & 56 based on the Feasibility Study finding that supports a reduction of traffic collisions and fatalities.

Vice Mayor Reynosa asked about a previously discussed Lincoln & El Monte roundabout for pedestrian safety. Reynosa asked that at the very least a blinking light should be installed to assist with pedestrian traffic. Director Hernandez advised that when identifying potential roundabout projects the least amount of property needed to purchase for the project was a priority.

Mayor Launer asked if a drainage project in conjunction with a roundabout project could be proposed. City Manager Patlan advised that the next roundabout project would look at storm drain improvements within the next CDBG study. Patlan advised the council's concerns would be added to the study.

A presentation will be given in a December meeting on various safety improvements around the city. Highway safety improvement grants will include pedestrian improvements and traffic improvements.

Council Member Thusu asked how large trucks would be affected going thru the roundabout. Engineer Watts advised there would be no problem. Thusu asked if a roundabout at Alta & Avenue 400 would be better to slow traffic coming into town rather than Kamm. Watts advised that during the new High School construction a roundabout has been planned for pedestrian safety.

Engineer Watts asked for the council's recommendation on the prioritization of the listed roundabout projects. Watts recommendation is to proceed with the prioritization of the Alta & 56 roundabout.

City Manager Patlan advised that the Alta & Avenue 400 roundabout is expected to include CalTrans funds.

A motion was made by Council Member Thusu, second by Council Member Nerio-Guerrero, to accept staffs recommendation on starting the environmental and design process for a roundabout located at the intersection of Road 56 and El Monte Way (Avenue 416).

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Reynosa, Thusu

6.5. SUBJECT
Acceptance of $2.0 Million Earmark from California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the Purchase of a New Fire Ladder Truck (JORW)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Pass Through Grant Subaward in the amount of $2,000,000.00 for the purchase of new fire apparatus and fire apparatus equipment and authorize the City Manager or designee to sign any related documents.

Fire Chief Webster presented that the City has been awarded $2.0 million through the office of Senator Melissa Hurtado to support the purchase of an aerial fire ladder truck. Webster stated the new apparatus will replace old equipment and will be formally ordered once funds have been accepted by the council.

Webster thanked Melissa Hurtado for the funds and recommends the Council approve and accept funds.

A motion was made by Council Member Thusu, second by Council Member Longoria, to accept California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Pass Through Grant Subaward in the amount of $2,000,000.00 for the purchase of new fire apparatus and fire apparatus equipment and authorize the City Manager or designee to sign any related documents.

Ayes: Launer, Longoria, Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu

7. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Nerio-Guerrero reported attending the Fire Station Centennial Celebration and thanked the fire staff for the event's success. Nerio-Guerrero advise attending Dog days and dressing up which she enjoyed.

Council Member Thusu thanked Public Works staff for their continued work around town, he is impressed with their hard work. Thusu thanked the Police department for their continued work. Thusu reported his gratitude and excitement in receiving 17.2 million in grants to be used to transform and improve the town. Congratulation to the staff who worked on grants.

Vice Mayor Reynosa reported attending the Fire Station Centennial Celebration and the event was well done. Reynosa attended the Dog Days event with her new dog. Reynosa invited everyone to the Historical Society's annual meeting this Sunday 2 pm - 4 pm.

Mayor Launer reported attending Dog Days and enjoying the event. Launer received a message regarding the Veterans Celebration and would like recognition for the celebration at the cemetery. Launer reported attending the Dinuba High School Ceremony recognizing their top award for Contraction Management.

8. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Patlan reported attending the Fire Station Centennial Celebration, staff did a great job.

9. CITY STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Assistant City Manager James gave an update on the Library project, bid opening on November 10, 2022. James reported attending the Fire Station Centennial Celebration and Dog Days.

Fire Chief Webster thanked the council for attending the Fire Station Centennial Celebration. Webster thanked his staff for their hard work. Webster reported working on the recruitment for FireFighter/Paramedics.

Police Chief Iriarte shared his department has various upcoming community policing projects. Iriarte reported his staff attended Dog Days and a Grand View school event.

Iriarte advised that the Prescription Takeback is this Saturday from 10 am - 2 pm., and the Brick and Stone Coffee with a Cop event is this Thursday from 7:30 am - 9 am.

Director Hernandez shared that the CTC/ATP scores were 98 points out of 100.

Hernandez worked hard with staff and TCAG on 7 applications, and 3 scored high enough for funding. Hernandez thanked all city staff who were involved in helping improve the application process. Reynosa will thank TCAG for their support at the next meeting. Patlan reported working with Ted Smally throughout the grant process, he appreciates his encouragement and support for Dinuba. Council will send a formal recognition for the support.

Engineer Watts reported Englehart Avenue will reopen this Thursday. Watts advised of traffic control on West El Monte Way starting October 31, 2022, for work on a sewer main between Alice & Lillie that is expected to last 2 weeks.

Director Hurtado reported Dog Days went well and thanked the Council for their feedback. Hurtado shared that the goal for Dog Days is to fund improvements in the Dog Park area with the purchase of agility equipment. Hurtado is hopeful that the goal will be met with the next Dog Days. Hurtado advised there is no update for Viscaya park.

10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Launer adjourned the meeting at 8:02 p.m.

City Council Staff Report
Department: ENGINEER/PLANNING October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Watts, City Engineer
Subject: Notice of Completion - Stony Creek Development (JW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept the Stony Creek Development public improvements as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the Tulare County Recorder's Office.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The parcel map improvements for Stony Creek Development has been completed in conformance with the requirements of the subdivision agreement and as specifically set forth in the plans and specifications approved by the City. The filling of a Notice of Completion will allow the performance securities provided by the developer to be released thirty-five (35) days after recordation.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The Parcel Map (Attachment 'A') for the Stony Creek Development was approved by the planning commission and City Council on October 14, 2003. The Parcel Map consisted of 5 parcels located on the southeast corner of Kamm and Alta Avenue. The development never developed due to the housing crash in 2008. Due to the right-of-way acquisition as part of the future Kamm and Alta Avenue Roundabout, the owner realized there were still bonds active and his development was never formally taken to City Council for acceptance. In order to release the performance securities, staff is recommending the formal acceptance of the Stony Creek Development.

The required improvements have been completed for the Stony Creek Development to the satisfaction of the former City Engineer and Rick Hartley, the previous Public Works Inspector. All public improvements have been found to be substantially complete by the developer as required by the subdivision agreement (Attachment 'C') and conditions of approval (Attachment 'D').

The next step is for the City Council to accept the improvements as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file the Notice of Completion enclosed herein as Attachment 'B' with the Tulare County Recorder's Office.

The performance securities on this development will be released thirty five (35) days after the recordation of the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Stony Creek Development Parcel Map
B. Notice of Completion
C. Stony Creek Subdivision Agreement
D. Stony Creek Conditions of Approval

1 RECORDING REQUESTED
AND RETURN TO:

CITY OF DINUBA

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
405 E. EL MONTE WAY
DINUBA, CA 93618
No Fee per Government Code 6103

N O T I C E O F C O M P L E T I O N
NOTICE IS HERE BY GIVEN:

1. That the City of Dinuba, a Municipal Corporation, whose address is 405 E. El Monte Way, Dinuba, California, is the owner of the real property, public works or structure hereinafter described.

2. That on the 10th of November 2010, a work of improvements on real property hereinafter described was completed pursuant to a Contract to which Chapter 5 of Part I of Division 5, of the Public Contract Code applies.

3. That the name of the Contractor who performed said work of improvements pursuant to said Contract with the City of Dinuba is Riyan Investments, Inc. and Dinuba Sequoia, Inc. whose address is, 120 Mission St., Santa Cruz, CA 95060 and 706 Capitola Ave., Suite G, Capitola, CA 95010.

4. That the real property or public works or structure is described as follows:

City of Dinuba
Stony Creek Development (Commercial Section Only)
The project consisted of public improvements required for a commercial of land known as Stony Creek Development. These improvements included domestic water, sanitary sewer, and retention pond, and public street improvements.

5. That the Nature of the owner’s interest or estate is: In Fee Dated: ___________________________, 2022

CITY OF DINUBA
A Municipal Corporation

By _________________________________
Jason Watts, PE Dinuba City Engineer

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS

COUNTY OF TULARE )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this _____ day of _______________, 2022, by Jason Watts, City Engineer of the City of Dinuba, a Municipal Corporation, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me.

_______________________________________
Notary Public in and for the County of Tulare,
State of California
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identy of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY CLERK October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Subject: Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (MA)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve City Council meeting minutes of October 11, 2022 as presented.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
None.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
City Council Meeting Minutes, October 11, 2022

City Council Staff Report
Department: Planning and Development October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karl Schoettler, City Planning Consultant
Subject: Ordinance No. 2022-11 (Montebella) Second reading and Adoption (Ksch)

RECOMMENDATION
Council conduct the second reading, waive reading in full, and adopt Ordinance 2022-11 pertaining to a change of zoning on four parcels located on the west side of Englehart Avenue north of the Saginaw Avenue alignment.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The action would result in prezoning of four parcels being annexed into the City.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
Application of city zoning is contingent upon approval of annexation of the site by Tulare LAFCo (Local Agency Formation Commission).

DISCUSSION
On September 13, 2022 the City Council conducted a first reading of Ordinance No. 2022-11 to prezone four parcels proposed for annexation. The largest of the parcels is proposed for a tentative subdivision map and the bulk of the parcel would be zoned R-1-6 (PD) (Single Family Residential (Planned Development overlay zone)). A smaller section of this parcel (proposed for a neighborhood park) would be zoned RCO The remaining three parcels (fronting upon Englehart Avenue) are proposed to be zoned R-1-7.5.

FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant will pay City impact fees for development of each lot within the proposed subdivision.

PUBLIC HEARING
A public hearing notice was published in the Mid-Valley Times prior to the City Council’s public hearing on September 13, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Ordinance 2022-11
ATTACHMENT “D”
1 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-11

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA AMENDING THE ZONING OF

FOUR PARCELS LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ENGLEHART AVENUE, NORTH OF SAGINAW AVENUE.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA HEREBY DOES ORDAIN:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
(a) The City of Dinuba administers a Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Dinuba Municipal Code), including a map that designates all parcels of land with specific zoning classifications.
(b) The purpose of zoning is to facilitate a well-planned City and to avoid land use conflicts, among other objectives.
(c) The City has received an application to annex four parcels on the west side of Englehart Avenue and the north side of the Saginaw Avenue alignment. The parcels are proposed to be designated with several zones as shown on Exhibit 1 (attached) including R-1-6 (PUD), RCO and R-1-7.5.
(d) The Assessor Parcel Numbers of the subject parcels are 272-011, 012-272-012, 012- 272-013, and 012-272-014.
(e) The purpose of the zone change is to facilitate annexation of the site, development of a residential subdivision and continued residential use of existing-developed parcels on the site.
(f) The proposed zone change is shown on Exhibit 1.

SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY.

Each of the provisions of this ordinance is severable from all other provisions. If any article, section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this Ordinance to be published by one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least five (5) days prior to adoption and again fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the ordinance is published, then the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the City of Dinuba
Ordinance 2022-11 (Montebella Phase 2/3)
2 Council meeting at which the ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its adoption.

SECTION 5. The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Dinuba on the 13th day of September, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Longoria, Rachel Nerio-Guerrero, Reynosa, Thusu
NOES: None
ABSENT: Launer
ABSTAIN: None
___________________________________
Linda Launer, Mayor of the City of Dinuba
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Maria Ananiz, City Clerk
City of Dinuba
Ordinance 2022-11 (Montebella Phase 2/3)
3 EXHIBIT 1
north
Englehart Ave.

Existing city limit boundary
“R-1-7.5”
“RCO”
“R-1-6 (PUD)”
City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY CLERK October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Subject: 20th Annual Veterans Dinner Sponsorship (MA)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to approve sponsorship in the amount of $500 for the 20th Annual Veterans Dinner to be held on November 3, 2022, at the Orosi Memorial Hall.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Vietnam Veterans of American is a non-profit organization that is hosting the 20th Annual Veterans Dinner. The event will be held on Thursday, November 3, 2022, and will be free for Veterans.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The group raises funds to provide 200 to 250 meals for Veterans at the 20th Annual Veterans Dinner. The event is back for the first time after the COVID Pandemic. The sponsorship will help the group reach their goal to feed Veterans. The dinner will also honor the individuals that did not return and are remembered.

The group has submitted a request for sponsorship (Attachment 'A').

FISCAL IMPACT
Sponsorship funds will come from the Community Grants/Miscellaneous Fund.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. 20th Annual Veterans Dinner Sponsorship Request

City Council Staff Report
Department: FINANCE SERVICES October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
By: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director
Subject: Warrant Register October 14 & 21, 2022 (KS)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
None.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
WR 10.14.2022
WR 10.21.2022
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1776 - A&M Consulting Engineers
INV12212021 A&M Consulting Eng Viscaya Park Paid by Check #38513 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,290.00 Vendor 1776 - A&M Consulting Engineers Totals Invoices 1 $4,290.00 Vendor 1284 - Adams Ashby Group, Inc.
4524 Grant Application Preparation
2022 CDBG
Paid by Check #38514 09/19/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 2,500.00 Vendor 1284 - Adams Ashby Group, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,500.00 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators
10/07/2022 10/07/2022 Paid by Check #38515 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 40,442.06 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators Totals Invoices 1 $40,442.06 Vendor 1599 - Adventist Health Toxicology
1762 PD - Toxicology Services Paid by Check #38516 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 476.00 Vendor 1599 - Adventist Health Toxicology Totals Invoices 1 $476.00 Vendor 119 - American Backflow Specialties
INV60720 BACKFLOW SUPPLIES Paid by Check #38517 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 624.83 Vendor 119 - American Backflow Specialties Totals Invoices 1 $624.83 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross
000250932148 HARTLEY 919M97599 10/01/22-
10/31/22
Paid by Check #38521 09/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 92.00 000254469785 MEDDERS 975A79192 11/01/22-
11/30/22
Paid by Check #38520 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 92.00 000254483899 TYLER 299A24237 11/01/22-
11/30/22
Paid by Check #38518 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 85.30 000254506923 MAGYAR 792A24403 11/01/22-
11/30/22
Paid by Check #38519 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 85.30 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross Totals Invoices 4 $354.60 Vendor 17 - AT&T
939105474310/22 Telephone 09/02/22-10/01/22 Paid by Check #38522 10/02/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 70.54 939105446110/22 Telephone 09/11/22-10/10/22 Paid by Check #38524 10/11/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.87 939105446610/22 Telephone 09/11/22-10/10/22 Paid by Check #38526 10/11/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.93 939105475610/22 Telephone 09/11/22-10/10/22 Paid by Check #38525 10/11/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 385.46 55959606499/22 PW - telephone 09/26/22-
10/25/22
Paid by Check #38523 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 2,208.03 Vendor 17 - AT&T Totals Invoices 5 $2,713.83
Vendor 1864 - Automated Access
7150248 F-GATE REPLACE DKS OPERATOR Paid by Check #38527 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 9,353.50 7150502 F-Gates SAW CUT 3 SAFETY
LOOPS
Paid by Check #38527 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,392.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 1 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1864 - Automated Access Totals Invoices 2 $10,745.50 Vendor 376 - BCS Consulting, LLC
2022131 CONSULTING SEPTEMBER 2022 Paid by Check #38528 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 6,200.00 Vendor 376 - BCS Consulting, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $6,200.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Analytical Laboratories
AF17146 WATER SAMPLE TESTING -

WATER DEPT
Paid by Check #38529 07/25/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 176.00 AF25336 WATER SAMPLE TESTING -

WATER DEPT
Paid by Check #38529 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 476.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Analytical Laboratories Totals Invoices 2 $652.00 Vendor 1 - C&S Laundry Cleaners
12231 Cleaning Paid by Check #38530 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 37.75 Vendor 1 - C&S Laundry Cleaners Totals Invoices 1 $37.75 Vendor 364 - California Building Standards Commission
7/1-9/30/2022BS 1st Quarter Building Standards
F/Y 22/23
Paid by Check #38531 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 359.10 Vendor 364 - California Building Standards Commission Totals Invoices 1 $359.10 Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co.

F-078388 REPAIR PART(S) FOR U 45 Paid by Check #38532 09/25/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 815.45 Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co. Totals Invoices 1 $815.45 Vendor 1275 - California Turf Equipment
564487 STREET SUPPLIES Paid by Check #38533 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 937.20 Vendor 1275 - California Turf Equipment Totals Invoices 1 $937.20 Vendor 725 - CDW Government
CZ07989 Upgrade MS SQL server from
2012 to 2019
Paid by Check #38534 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 580.08 CZ07996 Upgrade MS SQL server from
2012 to 2019
Paid by Check #38534 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 580.08 Vendor 725 - CDW Government Totals Invoices 2 $1,160.16 Vendor 381 - Cen Cal Distributing Inc.
292409 09/01/2022 water delivery Paid by Check #38535 09/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4.95 292410 09/22/2022 water delivery Paid by Check #38535 09/22/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 66.50 Vendor 381 - Cen Cal Distributing Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $71.45 Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2
4132743222 PD - Janitorial Supplies Paid by Check #38536 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 57.99 Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2 Totals Invoices 1 $57.99 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 2 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 127 - City of Visalia
AR095029 7/22 - 6/23 Hazmat Paid by Check #38537 07/31/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 3,085.73 Vendor 127 - City of Visalia Totals Invoices 1 $3,085.73 Vendor 240 - Clean Cut Landscape Management Inc.
3794 Landscaping September 2022 Paid by Check #38538 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 19,163.00 Vendor 240 - Clean Cut Landscape Management Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $19,163.00 Vendor 170 - Comcast
0135597 10/02/22 405 E El Monte Way 10/04/22-
11/03/22
Paid by Check #38540 10/02/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 69.49 0181138 09/27/22 180 W MERCED ST 10/02/2022-
11/01/2022
Paid by Check #38539 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 507.38 Vendor 170 - Comcast Totals Invoices 2 $576.87
Vendor 1261 - Commercial Radiator Works, Inc.
51660 REPAIR PART(S) FOR T 20 Paid by Check #38541 09/19/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 295.00 Vendor 1261 - Commercial Radiator Works, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $295.00 Vendor 1748 - Coro Medical
PS-INV156049 Safety Equipment/supplies Paid by Check #38542 08/22/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,794.56 Vendor 1748 - Coro Medical Totals Invoices 1 $1,794.56
Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer
C26460 PUBLIC WORKS - BUILDING

INSPECTION CARD - ORANGE
Paid by Check #38543 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,057.88 Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer Totals Invoices 1 $1,057.88 Vendor 1460 - David Volz Design Landscape Architects, Inc. 422339 21-036 Nebraska Park Paid by Check #38544 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,480.00 Vendor 1460 - David Volz Design Landscape Architects, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $4,480.00 Vendor 1035 - De Lage Landen Public Finance
77664972 Sept/Oct 2022 Paid by EFT #2164 09/24/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 322.25 Vendor 1035 - De Lage Landen Public Finance Totals Invoices 1 $322.25 Vendor 1582 - Dell Financial Services LLC
2185504 SERVER 11/01/22 -11/30/22 Paid by Check #38545 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 2,947.71 Vendor 1582 - Dell Financial Services LLC Totals Invoices 1 $2,947.71 Vendor 71 - Department of Conservation
JUL-SEP 22 SMIP 1ST QTR SMIP PAYMENT 22/23 Paid by Check #38546 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 975.31 Vendor 71 - Department of Conservation Totals Invoices 1 $975.31 Vendor 77 - Department of Justice
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 3 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 609652 PD/FD - Fingerprint services /
September 2022
Paid by Check #38547 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,245.00 Vendor 77 - Department of Justice Totals Invoices 1 $1,245.00 Vendor 200 - Dinuba Unified School District
1742 DSC Senior Monthly Lunches -
Aug. 2022
Paid by Check #38548 09/15/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 6,435.00 Vendor 200 - Dinuba Unified School District Totals Invoices 1 $6,435.00 Vendor 550 - Division of the State Architect
7122-93022 SB 1ST QTR SB1186 PAYMENT - FY
22/23
Paid by Check #38549 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 390.80 Vendor 550 - Division of the State Architect Totals Invoices 1 $390.80 Vendor 1861 - Electric Time Company, Inc
0000028166 Fy 22/23-Parks-Refurbished
automatic clock controller
w/chime
Paid by Check #38550 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 759.00 Vendor 1861 - Electric Time Company, Inc Totals Invoices 1 $759.00 Vendor 1506 - Enterprise FM Trust
FBN4578048 PD - 3 Malibus & 2 Durangos
Lease
Paid by Check #38551 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 2,836.04 FBN4578024 ENTERPRISE - FLEET LEASE

PAYMENT
Paid by Check #38551 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 6,848.84 Vendor 1506 - Enterprise FM Trust Totals Invoices 2 $9,684.88 Vendor 280 - Entersect
922EP31191 PD - September 2022 Service Paid by Check #38552 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 100.00 Vendor 280 - Entersect Totals Invoices 1 $100.00
Vendor 1518 - Formation Environmental, LLC
7219 Remediation Review-Gas N SaveAugust 2022Paid by Check #38553 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 2,943.75 Vendor 1518 - Formation Environmental, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $2,943.75 Vendor 18 - The Gas Company
0990155800810/22 405 E El Monte Way 09/02/22-
10/04/22
Paid by Check #38554 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 38.99 Vendor 18 - The Gas Company Totals Invoices 1 $38.99
Vendor 252 - Geil Enterprises, Inc.
420180 TRANSIT FIRE/BURGLAR ALARM
OCT-DEC 2022
Paid by Check #38555 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 291.00 Vendor 252 - Geil Enterprises, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $291.00 Vendor 712 - GLS US
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 4 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 4819905 POSTAGE Paid by Check #38556 09/18/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 7.04 Vendor 712 - GLS US Totals Invoices 1 $7.04
Vendor 1351 - Grant's AC & Heating Inc.
55083959 POLICE DEPARTMENT - AC
REPAIR
Paid by Check #38557 09/21/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 155.00 Vendor 1351 - Grant's AC & Heating Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $155.00 Vendor 605 - Frank Guerra
10/11/2022 Anthem Reimb 10/01/2022-
10/31/2022
Paid by Check #38558 10/11/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 228.38 Vendor 605 - Frank Guerra Totals Invoices 1 $228.38
Vendor 1849 - Halcyon Behavioral, LLC
12385 EAP Services for October 2022 Paid by Check #38559 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 30.40 Vendor 1849 - Halcyon Behavioral, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $30.40 Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security
591571 DSC - Security Monitoring Paid by Check #38560 09/20/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 105.00 Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security Totals Invoices 1 $105.00 Vendor 174 - Howard's Pest Control
108548 October 2022 Paid by Check #38561 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 93.00 108556 Fy 22/23-Parks-Pest control
service for Vuich park
Paid by Check #38561 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 75.00 108562 Fy 22/23-Parks-Pest control
service for KC park
Paid by Check #38561 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 46.00 108570 FY 22/23-Sportsplex-Pest control
service for mosquitoes
Paid by Check #38561 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 250.00 107083 Dinuba Transit Center- 180 W
Merced St (Acct #: 27335)
Paid by Check #38561 08/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 65.00 107452 180 W Merced St (Acct #:
27335)-Trouble Call
Paid by Check #38561 08/18/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 45.00 108545 Dinuba Transit Center- 180 W
Merced St (Acct #: 27335)
Paid by Check #38561 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 75.00 108560 Customer No. KA1088 - PUBLIC
WORKS
Paid by Check #38561 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 135.00 108605 PEST CONTROL SERVICES -
WWTP
Paid by Check #38561 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 55.00 Vendor 174 - Howard's Pest Control Totals Invoices 9 $839.00 Vendor 106 - J's Communciation Inc.
64254 PD - Portable Radio Repairs
Shipping Charges
Paid by Check #38562 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 28.00 64333 PD - Motorcycle #1 / Radio
Extension Cable
Paid by Check #38562 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 288.40 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 5 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 106 - J's Communciation Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $316.40 Vendor 6 - Jim Manning Dodge Inc.

DOCS140634 REPAIR PART(S) FOR DODGE
DURANGO 2020
Paid by Check #38563 08/22/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 40.00 155734DOR REPAIR PART(S) PD 16 Paid by Check #38563 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,288.98 Vendor 6 - Jim Manning Dodge Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $1,328.98 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co.
6022709 PD - Service Paid by Check #38564 08/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 206.06 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co. Totals Invoices 1 $206.06
Vendor 218 - Key Evidence Lock and Safe
131745 CYBER LOCK WEB HOSTING
SERVICE ANNUAL FEE 2022-2023
Paid by Check #38565 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 500.00 Vendor 218 - Key Evidence Lock and Safe Totals Invoices 1 $500.00 Vendor 724 - Language Line Services, Inc.
10637595 PD - Translation Services Paid by Check #38566 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 21.62 Vendor 724 - Language Line Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $21.62 Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California 55100292972 Bus 12 Replaced (2) Front Tires Paid by Check #38567 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 535.20 55100293044 BUS 7 REPLACED FRONT TIRES Paid by Check #38567 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 535.20 55100293125 4 TIRES FOR PD 23 Paid by Check #38567 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 778.78 55100293353 2 TIRES FOR M 735 Paid by Check #38567 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 535.20 55100293627 ALIGNMENT FOR PD 17 Paid by Check #38567 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 129.99 55100293628 BUS 12 REPLACED ALL 4 REAR
TIRES
Paid by Check #38567 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,070.40 55100293673 ALIGNMENT FOR PD 17 Paid by Check #38567 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 129.99 Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California Totals Invoices 7 $3,714.76 Vendor 1797 - David Mendoza
10/11/2022 Anthem Reimb 09/01/2022-
09/30/2022
Paid by Check #38568 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 201.38 Vendor 1797 - David Mendoza Totals Invoices 1 $201.38
Vendor 160 - Mid Valley Publishing Inc.
0012684 10/2022 Membership Renewal Dinuba City
Hall Human Resources
Paid by Check #38569 09/22/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 30.00 0326613-IN 09/1/22 Ordinance No. 2022-10 Paid by Check #38569 09/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 161.25 0326661-IN 09/15 Ord No. 2022-10 Paid by Check #38569 09/15/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 157.50 0326687-IN SECOND READING AND

ADOPTION FOR CASTLEROCK
Paid by Check #38569 09/22/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 176.25 Vendor 160 - Mid Valley Publishing Inc. Totals Invoices 4 $525.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 6 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc.
2375571 WATER SAMPLE TESTING WWTP
- IN HOUSE
Paid by Check #38570 08/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 115.00 2377015 WATER SAMPLE TESTING WWTP
- INDUSTRIAL
Paid by Check #38570 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 88.00 2377024 WATER SAMPLE TESTING WWTP
- INDUSTRIAL
Paid by Check #38570 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 88.00 2377068 WATER SAMPLE TESTING WWTP
- IN HOUSE
Paid by Check #38570 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 70.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc. Totals Invoices 4 $361.00 Vendor 1570 - Mountain Valley Environmental Services, Inc. 3881 CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR

SERVICES WWTP - NOVEMBER
2022
Paid by Check #38571 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,871.70 Vendor 1570 - Mountain Valley Environmental Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $4,871.70 Vendor 1754 - Navia Benefits Solutions
10522131 202201 - Sec. 125 Participant Fee
09/22
Paid by Check #38572 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 312.00 Vendor 1754 - Navia Benefits Solutions Totals Invoices 1 $312.00 Vendor 1749 - NEOGOV
INV-23890 Subscription 09/30/22-
09/29/2023
Paid by Check #38573 08/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,946.40 Vendor 1749 - NEOGOV Totals Invoices 1 $4,946.40
Vendor 900 - NetMotion Wireless, Inc.

I0063808 PD - Mobility (36 Devices)
Software Maintenance (1YR)
Paid by Check #38574 05/13/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 3,512.57 Vendor 900 - NetMotion Wireless, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $3,512.57 Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts
3641-486306 Supplies Paid by Check #38575 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 117.11 Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts Totals Invoices 1 $117.11 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD
256222603001 CH-Office Supplies return Paid by Check #38576 08/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 (33.73) 264846088003 break room supplies Paid by Check #38576 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 14.19 270134133001 HR Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 379.74 270134364001 HR Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 49.87 257912683001 DSC - Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 07/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 542.39 258597509001 DSC - Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 07/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 69.90 258601362001 DSC - Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 07/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 16.16 258487498001 DSC - Office Supplies Paid by Check #38576 08/25/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 62.81 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 7 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD Totals Invoices 8 $1,101.33 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
233750151149/22 250 W SAGINAW AVE 08/30/22-
09/28/22
Paid by Check #38595 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 28.93 265692021589/22 L & L EL MONTE & LILLIE
08/24/22-09/22/22
Paid by Check #38582 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 11.16 519248951329/22 L & L 502 RD 72 TIMER 08/24/22
-09/22/22
Paid by Check #38585 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10.91 777130818089/22 L & L 200 S ROAD 72 08/24/22-
09/22/22
Paid by Check #38590 09/23/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 9.86 245952415719/22 L & L NEWTON & NORTHRIDGE
08/25/22-09/25/22
Paid by Check #38581 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 5.68 543881697549/22 L & L NEWTON & NORTHRIDGE
08/25/22-09/25/22
Paid by Check #38586 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 324.11 854359817429/22 L & L Sugar Plum Estates Del
Valle 08/17/22-09/15/22
Paid by Check #38593 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 179.76 914674420589/22 L & L DAVIS E/ALTA AVE
08/25/22-09/25/22
Paid by Check #38594 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10.51 076626534149/22 L & L 1300 ROSEMARY AVE
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38578 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 239.13 134955182539/22 L & L 1300 SAGINAW AVE
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38579 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 49.07 159468019569/22 Parks 855 E EL MONTE WAY
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38580 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 647.77 360067439049/22 L & L 698 N LINCOLN AVE
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38583 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 15.71 468994256009/22 L & L 1101 VISCAYA PKWY
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38584 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 11.70 497903928049/22 DSC Electric 8/26 - 9/26/22 Paid by Check #38577 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,593.37 556426429409/22 L & L 08/26/22-09/26/22 Paid by Check #38587 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 192.91 622008882879/22 Parks EL MONTE & MC KINLEY
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38588 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 85.83 790546574289/22 L & L 1150 E NEBRASKA AVE
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38591 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10.51 811658854359/22 L & L 1920 E LAUREN AVE
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38592 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 65.46 678266701759/22 L & L ALICE & W NORTH WAY
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38589 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 161.92 0008134154-7 2099 W SIERRA WAY B August
2022
Paid by Check #38596 09/16/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 215.04 037563698509/22 N/E RD 76 & AVE 416 08/25/22-
09/23/22
Paid by Check #38597 09/25/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 95.74 312018483279/22 7387 W SIERRA WAY AVE
08/24/22-09/22/22
Paid by Check #38605 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 16,936.12 821880068199/22 2099 W SIERRA WAY B 08/24/22-
09/22-22
Paid by Check #38619 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,053.92 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 8 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 041816753179/22 RD 72 & W SIERRA WAY
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38598 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 482.01 058483210139/22 NE CRAWFORD & GERALD
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38600 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 108.79 323048378379/22 S/E COR HAYES & GERALD
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38606 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10.51 459224718969/22 111 N HAYES AVE 08/26/22-
09/26/22
Paid by Check #38608 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 32.16 588309194019/22 188 N L ST 08/26/22-09/26/22 Paid by Check #38614 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 32.11 837649722679/22 S/E COR NEWTON & DAVIS
08/26/22-09/26/22
Paid by Check #38620 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 147.14 896878734589/22 651 W SAGINAW AVE 08/26/22-
09/26/22
Paid by Check #38623 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 229.76 949217492259/22 1315 N EUCLID AVE 08/26/22-
09/26/22
Paid by Check #38626 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10.51 475197165689/22 HAYES & EDWARDS 08/29/22-
09/27/22
Paid by Check #38609 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 40.80 477215765299/22 ALTA & EL MONTE WAY 08/27/22
-09/27/22
Paid by Check #38610 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 166.91 493969444879/22 110 S COLLEGE AVE 08/29/22-
09/27/22
Paid by Check #38616 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 11.19 535548886279/22 912 N ALTA @SAGINAW & ALTA Paid by Check #38612 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 73.61 565766708999/22 NW COR ALICE & W EL MONTE
WAY 08/27/22-09/27/22
Paid by Check #38613 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 98.28 665766702529/22 NW COR ALTA & RD 80 08/27/22-
09/27/22
Paid by Check #38615 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 74.38 864715010309/22 ON E EL MONTE WAY & PERRY
08/27/22-09/27/22
Paid by Check #38622 09/28/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 69.74 168660015859/22 2255 W EL MONTE WAY 08/30/22
-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38602 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 69.54 212523687139/22 1215 W EL MONTE WAY 08/30/22
-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38603 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.64 245914958179/22 SW SW 7-16-24 08/29/22-
09/27/22
Paid by Check #38604 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 7,029.68 335464179669/22 KAMM & O ST 08/30/22-09/28/22 Paid by Check #38607 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 135.98 506469548399/22 CRAWFORD & EL MONTE SW Paid by Check #38611 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 110.14 839793222589/22 3481 W EL MONTE WAY 08/30/22
-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38618 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.64 898192338789/22 150 W SAGINAW AVE 08/30/22-
09/28/22
Paid by Check #38624 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 66.71 923705812639/22 2813 W EL MONTE WAY 08/30/22
-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38625 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.64 057129638259/22 PW 08/31/22-09/29/22 Paid by Check #38599 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 135.20 141629409459/22 389 W EL MONTE WAY 08/31/22-
09/29/22
Paid by Check #38601 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 73.64 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 9 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 863399039989.22 WELL #14 SIERRA WAY 08/30/22
-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38621 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 24.64 7149346409410/22 EUCLID S/LINDARA WELL #18
08/30/22-09/28/22
Paid by Check #38617 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,980.27 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 50 $36,242.74 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services
689257 Mattress Charges Paid by Check #38627 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 700.00 689269 SELF HAUL - CEMENT, DIRTY

CEMENT, YARD WASTE, SOLID

MIXED WASTE
Paid by Check #38627 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 160.83 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services Totals Invoices 2 $860.83 Vendor 968 - Quic Shop Markets, Inc.
10582 CAR WASHES - SEPTEMBER 2022 Paid by Check #38628 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 20.00 Vendor 968 - Quic Shop Markets, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $20.00 Vendor 1583 - Joel Ramirez
SAN RAMON 93022 CALBO EDUCATION WEEK - JOEL

RAMIREZ
Paid by Check #38629 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 289.00 Vendor 1583 - Joel Ramirez Totals Invoices 1 $289.00
Vendor 689 - Denis Richardson

REIM BOOT DR BOOT ALLOWANCE - DENIS
RICHARDSON FY 2223
Paid by Check #38630 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 159.95 Vendor 689 - Denis Richardson Totals Invoices 1 $159.95 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West
10032022 BOOT ALLOWANCE - FY 2223

TIM G, RICHARD S, ERIC J,

GONZALO R
Paid by Check #38631 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 777.22 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West Totals Invoices 1 $777.22 Vendor 1707 - RRM Design Group
2415-01-0822B Dinuba Focused General Plan
Update SB2: Task 02, 07 & 3B
Paid by Check #38632 09/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 4,687.50 Vendor 1707 - RRM Design Group Totals Invoices 1 $4,687.50 Vendor 1823 - Santander Bank, N.A.
2844132 PD - U#8, U#12 & U#25 Lease Paid by Check #38633 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 15,859.00 Vendor 1823 - Santander Bank, N.A. Totals Invoices 1 $15,859.00 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties
159326 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES Paid by Check #38634 09/20/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 191.78 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties Totals Invoices 1 $191.78 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 10 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises
DIN18HM 09-22 DIN18HM ADMIN CHARGES;
SEPTEMBER 2022
Paid by Check #38635 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 468.75 DIN19HM 09-22 DIN19HM GENERAL ADMIN
SEPTEMBER 2022
Paid by Check #38635 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 972.00 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises Totals Invoices 2 $1,440.75 Vendor 61 - Silvas Oil Company Inc.
616945 DIESEL FUEL WWTP Paid by Check #38636 09/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,906.35 Vendor 61 - Silvas Oil Company Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $1,906.35 Vendor 1396 - Social Vocational Services, Inc.
40S2204-IN Fy 22/23-Parks-Grounds Maint for
Sept, 2022
Paid by Check #38637 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/07/2022 10/14/2022 1,686.77 Vendor 1396 - Social Vocational Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $1,686.77 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts
9406519 100122 Fy 22/23-Dept bottled water
service
Paid by Check #38638 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/03/2022 10/14/2022 189.62 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts Totals Invoices 1 $189.62
Vendor 1442 - Superior Pool Products, LLC
Q2020269 DRUM DEPOSIT REFUND Paid by Check #38639 08/18/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 (75.00) Q2020992 CHLORINE FOR WWTP Paid by Check #38639 10/05/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 324.43 Q2021026 DRUM DEPOSIT REFUND Paid by Check #38639 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 (75.00) Vendor 1442 - Superior Pool Products, LLC Totals Invoices 3 $174.43 Vendor 189 - Terminix International
425388017 CH-405 E El Monte Way
09/02/2022
Paid by Check #38640 09/02/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 66.00 Vendor 189 - Terminix International Totals Invoices 1 $66.00 Vendor 1564 - The Home Depot Pro
708984588 FACIAL TISSUE Paid by Check #38641 09/27/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 448.84 Vendor 1564 - The Home Depot Pro Totals Invoices 1 $448.84 Vendor 1082 - 3R Construction or The Island Convention Center 005033 3R Construction Entertainment
Plaza Palm Tree Imp
Paid by Check #38642 09/08/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 14,300.00 005034 REPAIR LOCK AT RAQUETBALL

COURT, REC CENTER
Paid by Check #38642 09/21/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 925.00 Vendor 1082 - 3R Construction or The Island Convention Center Totals Invoices 2 $15,225.00 Vendor 717 - TMI Research Services
CITYOD 22-9-30 SERVICE MONTH SEPTEMBER
2022
Paid by Check #38643 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 270.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 11 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 717 - TMI Research Services Totals Invoices 1 $270.00 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. 4003612630 POLARIS LEASE PAYMENT Paid by Check #38644 09/26/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 296.74 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $296.74 Vendor 902 - Tractor Supply Credit Plan
0027 09/29/2022 FD - Supplies/equipment Paid by Check #38645 09/29/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,169.61 Vendor 902 - Tractor Supply Credit Plan Totals Invoices 1 $1,169.61 Vendor 1352 - Trizetto Provider Solutions, LLC
3U25102200 SERVICE MONTH OCTOBER 2022 Paid by Check #38646 10/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 414.52 Vendor 1352 - Trizetto Provider Solutions, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $414.52 Vendor 49 - Tulare County
30233-23Qtr1 PD - Non-Custody Intake Program
/ Jul - Sep 2022
Paid by Check #38647 10/04/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 3,739.41 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 1 $3,739.41
Vendor 273 - US Bank
8693601312239 PW Fuel for September 2022 Paid by Check #38648 09/24/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 131.36 Vendor 273 - US Bank Totals Invoices 1 $131.36
Vendor 154 - USA Bluebook
719289A CORRECTION ON INVOICE
808811
Paid by Check #38649 09/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 14.76 Vendor 154 - USA Bluebook Totals Invoices 1 $14.76
Vendor 359 - Valero Marketing & Supply Company
84285989 September 2022 Paid by EFT #2163 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 8,920.34 84285530 PD - 09/07/2022 - 10/06/2022
Fuel Charges
Paid by EFT #2165 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 14,488.76 84268182 PW Fuel for September 2022 Paid by EFT #2166 10/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 11,145.68 Vendor 359 - Valero Marketing & Supply Company Totals Invoices 3 $34,554.78 Vendor 14 - W & E Electric
2209003 INSTALL NEW CORD & CORD CAP

ON MIXER, A DIGESTER - WWTP
Paid by Check #38650 09/01/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 952.02 2209002 CHECK LIFT PUMP VFD & MOTOR Paid by Check #38650 09/02/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 100.00 2209029 REWIRE 2 LIFT PUMP, INSTALL

MOISTURE SENSOR, KAMM AND
O ST
Paid by Check #38650 09/06/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 259.45 2209028 REWIRE CONTROL FOR PUMP 2,

KAMM AND O ST
Paid by Check #38650 09/07/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 539.48 2209027 CHECK BREAKER AT WELL 16 Paid by Check #38650 09/08/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 100.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 12 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 2209026 REPLACE BAD BREAKER & WIRE ,
WELL 16
Paid by Check #38650 09/09/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 1,457.11 2209051 CHECK LIFT PUMP, NEWTON &
DAVIS
Paid by Check #38650 09/15/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 100.00 2209050 CHECK AIR GAP PRESSURE

SWITCH, DEWATERING AREA -
WWTP
Paid by Check #38650 09/20/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 100.00 Vendor 14 - W & E Electric Totals Invoices 8 $3,608.06
Vendor SANDRA AREVALO
692022-FY2223 DAYCARE LICENSE REFUND -

AREVALO SANDRA FAMILY CHILD
CARE
Paid by Check #38651 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 98.00 Vendor SANDRA AREVALO Totals Invoices 1 $98.00
Vendor RITA DELGADO
6102022-FY2223 DAYCARE LICENSE REFUND -

LITTLE CRUM CRUNCHERS DAY
CARE
Paid by Check #38652 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 98.00 Vendor RITA DELGADO Totals Invoices 1 $98.00
Vendor KIMBERLY FLORER
7152022-FY2223 Contractual Paid by Check #38653 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 98.00 Vendor KIMBERLY FLORER Totals Invoices 1 $98.00
Vendor GEIGER ELECTRIC, INC
20517 REFUND FOR DOUBLE LICENSE

PAYEMENT
Paid by Check #38654 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 43.50 Vendor GEIGER ELECTRIC, INC Totals Invoices 1 $43.50
Vendor MARIA EMMA GUERRERO
662022-FY2223 DAYCARE LICENSE REFUND - BIG

HUG DAY CARE
Paid by Check #38655 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 82.00 Vendor MARIA EMMA GUERRERO Totals Invoices 1 $82.00
Vendor TERESA MENDOZA
6282022-FY2223 DAYCARE LICENSE REFUND -

ARLYN'S DAY CARE
Paid by Check #38656 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 82.00 Vendor TERESA MENDOZA Totals Invoices 1 $82.00
Vendor NORA MARTINEZ OR RAYMOND MARTINEZ
662022-FY2223 DAYCARE LICENSE REFUND -

MARTINEZ DAYCARE
Paid by Check #38657 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 82.00 Vendor NORA MARTINEZ OR RAYMOND MARTINEZ Totals Invoices 1 $82.00 Vendor TERESA SANCHEZ
622022-FY2223 Contractual Paid by Check #38658 10/10/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 82.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 13 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor TERESA SANCHEZ Totals Invoices 1 $82.00
Vendor Universal Care
22-3247 Overpayment Run #22-3247 Paid by Check #38659 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 139.82 Vendor Universal Care Totals Invoices 1 $139.82
Vendor Andrew Vega
22-1912 Overpayment Run #22-1912 Paid by Check #38660 09/30/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 10/14/2022 139.00 Vendor Andrew Vega Totals Invoices 1 $139.00
Grand Totals Invoices 198 $277,795.12
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/14/2022 11:34:40 AM Page 14 of 14 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/08/22 - 10/14/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 72 - A-C Electric Company
57915 H.W. MCC PANEL BAD CARD Paid by Check #38661 10/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 634.00 Vendor 72 - A-C Electric Company Totals Invoices 1 $634.00 Vendor 206 - ADT Security Services, Inc.
948530365 Fy 22/23-CS-Qrtly fees for alarm
monitoring srvcs 11/22-1/23
Paid by Check #38662 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 172.44 Vendor 206 - ADT Security Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $172.44 Vendor 1807 - AM Consulting Engineers, INC
2021-219 AM Consulting Report Of Waste
Discharge
Paid by Check #38663 12/07/2021 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 3,920.00 2022-032 AM Consulting Report Of Waste
Discharge
Paid by Check #38663 03/05/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 620.00 2022-155 AM Consulting Clarifier Paid by Check #38663 07/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 4,900.00 2022-156 AM Consulting Aeration System Paid by Check #38663 07/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 22,080.00 2022-181 AM Consulting Clarifier Paid by Check #38663 08/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 760.00 2022-182 AM Consulting Aeration System Paid by Check #38663 08/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18,110.00 2022-211 AM Consulting Clarifier Paid by Check #38663 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,220.00 2022-212 AM Consulting Aeration System Paid by Check #38663 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 14,760.00 2022-235 AM Consulting Report Of Waste
Discharge
Paid by Check #38663 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,720.00 Vendor 1807 - AM Consulting Engineers, INC Totals Invoices 9 $70,090.00 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross
00025449943 SANO 060M86753 11/01/22-
11/30/22
Paid by Check #38664 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 105.40 000254502071 ROBERTS 102A78783 Paid by Check #38665 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 92.00 000254502833 HARMAN 532W04713 11/01/22-
11/30/22
Paid by Check #38666 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 92.00 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross Totals Invoices 3 $289.40 Vendor 21 - Aramark Uniform Services Inc.
5031066192 Fy 22/23-Parks-Uniforms for the
week of 10/12/22
Paid by Check #38667 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/13/2022 10/21/2022 51.35 Vendor 21 - Aramark Uniform Services Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $51.35 Vendor 17 - AT&T
250127196110/22 405 E El Monte Way 10/01/22-
10/31/22
Paid by Check #38671 10/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 76.22 238451821410/22 405 E El Monte Way 10/07/22-
11/06/22
Paid by Check #38672 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 68.96 939105446710/22 Telephone 09/11/22-10/10/22 Paid by Check #38673 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 48.06 939105447610/22 Telephone 09/10/22-10/09/22 Paid by Check #38674 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 24.87 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 1 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 939105447510/22 CS - Telephone 09/10/2022-
10/09/2022
Paid by Check #38670 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 24.90 939106901210/22 Sportsplex - Telephone
09/10/2022-10/09/2022
Paid by Check #38669 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 68.82 939105446210/22 DSC - Telephone 9/11 - 10/10/22 Paid by Check #38668 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 79.46 9391054469 10/22 PD - 09/11/2022 - 10/10/2022
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #38675 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 23.20 9391054740 10/22 PD - 09/11/2022 - 10/10/2022
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #38676 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 280.08 Vendor 17 - AT&T Totals Invoices 9 $694.57
Vendor 300 - Beatwear Inc.
7591 PD - Uniform / ACO Robin Galvan Paid by Check #38677 10/03/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 461.10 Vendor 300 - Beatwear Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $461.10
Vendor 1665 - Behavioral Analysis Training, Inc.

IV02035 PD - Investigative Interview &
Interrogation - Jacob Aguilar
Paid by Check #38678 07/25/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 575.00 Vendor 1665 - Behavioral Analysis Training, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $575.00 Vendor 1070 - Belmont Nursery, Inc.
1-206-221012-003 Fy 22/23-Parks-5-Juniperus
Chinenis Gold Plants
Paid by Check #38679 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 33.74 Vendor 1070 - Belmont Nursery, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $33.74 Vendor 80 - California Business Machines
307901 PD - Copiers Maintenance Paid by Check #38680 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 440.72 Vendor 80 - California Business Machines Totals Invoices 1 $440.72 Vendor 1275 - California Turf Equipment
566011 Fy 22/23-ParksThrottle cable, file
handle, gauge
Paid by Check #38681 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 61.38 Vendor 1275 - California Turf Equipment Totals Invoices 1 $61.38 Vendor 725 - CDW Government
DD37367 Fy 22/23-CS-Data Closet Paid by Check #38682 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 171.45 Vendor 725 - CDW Government Totals Invoices 1 $171.45
Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2
4130166499 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 124.35 4130166583 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 144.85 4130166730 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 767.57 4130662241 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 244.39 4130662300 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 21.16 4130662314 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 87.38 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 2 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 4130662333 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 179.24 4130662352 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 92.08 4130662370 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 214.84 4130770397 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 144.85 4130770466 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 124.35 4130770511 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 631.58 4131377420 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 225.59 4131377518 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 92.08 4131377784 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 214.84 4131547625 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 144.85 4131547626 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 124.35 4131547695 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 698.94 4132070895 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 264.68 4132070932 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 21.16 4132070965 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 101.60 4132070983 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 191.17 4132071003 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 161.24 4132071184 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 215.03 4132194889 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 145.20 4132194907 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 124.35 4132195095 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 753.10 4132743204 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 225.59 4132743259 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 116.18 4132743565 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 302.81 4132915660 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 124.35 4132915762 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 144.85 4132915909 Contractual Paid by Check #38683 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,359.96 Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2 Totals Invoices 33 $8,528.56 Vendor 1419 - Collins & Schoettler Planning Consultant, Inc. 1330 Collins Schoettler Planning
Support
Paid by Check #38684 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 7,701.48 1334 Zoning Ordinance Update
September 2022
Paid by Check #38684 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 660.00 Vendor 1419 - Collins & Schoettler Planning Consultant, Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $8,361.48 Vendor 170 - Comcast
0148160 10/11/22 1390 E ELIZABETH WAY OFC
10/16/22-11/15/22
Paid by Check #38686 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 247.64 0160181 10/07/22 1088 E KAMM AVE 10/11/22-
11/10/22
Paid by Check #38685 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 32.17 Vendor 170 - Comcast Totals Invoices 2 $279.81
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 3 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 731 - Community Services & Employment Training, Inc.

SEFFS-DIKCV-04 CSET ATP KC Vista Park Project Paid by Check #38687 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,402.75 Vendor 731 - Community Services & Employment Training, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,402.75 Vendor 1576 - Creative Asphalt, Inc.
8015 Creative Asphalt Alley Repairs Paid by Check #38688 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 8,560.00 8016 Creative Asphalt Alley Repairs Paid by Check #38688 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 5,770.00 Vendor 1576 - Creative Asphalt, Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $14,330.00 Vendor 4 - Dinuba Lumber Company
488567 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 54.63 488604 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 43.92 488611 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 15.41 488632 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 13.69 488633 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 13.65 488728 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 240.86 488775 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18.25 488881 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 53.38 488996 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 98.23 489025 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 27.41 489058 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 32.38 489073 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 49.86 489094 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.35 489095 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 9.17 489119 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 36.12 489140 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.26 489260 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 41.01 489675 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/03/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2.72 489676 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/03/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 (26.34) 489677 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/03/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 104.43 490199 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 120.19 490602 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 28.04 490642 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 16.06 490691 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 164.51 490737 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 9.83 490809 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.43 490839 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 14.64 490841 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 22.35 490980 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 9.75 490987 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18.45 491009 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 450.22 491026 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 19.80 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 4 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 491027 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 33.16 491121 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 47.07 491240 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 15.60 491276 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 41.59 491406 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 51.57 491430 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 34.33 491436 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 38.46 491446 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 22.23 491467 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 24.40 491473 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 17.92 491507 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 42.61 491528 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 86.77 491622 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 27.92 491629 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 16.26 491849 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/09/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.17 491853 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/09/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 28.69 492855 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 43.90 492903 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 79.60 493059 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 15.52 493122 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 47.18 493262 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 42.23 493265 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 31.50 493281 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 67.54 493285 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 48.30 493292 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 16.58 493348 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 17.13 493376 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.08 493408 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 68.33 493445 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 31.87 493449 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.14 493450 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 75.55 493452 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 9.27 493455 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.90 493463 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 4.37 493513 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 7.60 493553 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 53.13 493603 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 59.27 493642 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.73 493644 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 46.85 493667 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2.82 493669 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 16.77 493713 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 7.05 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 5 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 493794 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 78.10 493801 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 100.95 493860 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 44.63 493911 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 157.11 494093 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 12.56 494099 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.14 494141 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 41.98 494144 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 70.24 494473 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 55.94 494532 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/16/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 8.97 494564 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/16/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 63.46 494806 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/16/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 11.71 494841 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/16/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.11 495679 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/19/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 90.48 495774 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/19/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 9.53 495820 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/19/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 29.27 495832 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/19/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.14 495996 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 50.66 496003 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 358.55 496017 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 4.21 496073 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.67 496127 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.15 496223 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18.93 496224 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.31 496248 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 4.48 496256 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 281.02 496378 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 11.71 496447 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 136.66 496470 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 107.94 496497 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 53.70 496663 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 34.92 496695 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 12.39 496701 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 21.69 496721 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 13.37 496848 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 14.15 496850 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 70.74 496867 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 67.75 497104 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 50.93 497116 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 12.56 497124 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 6.62 497187 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 61.67 497204 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 21.69 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 6 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 497266 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/22/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 5.84 497544 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/23/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.15 497554 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/23/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 (.20) 497816 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/24/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 46.86 498581 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.29 498646 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.50 498648 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 27.33 498672 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 34.94 498674 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 59.88 498696 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 8.46 498707 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 7.52 498862 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.24 498876 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 12.39 498918 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 32.40 498925 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 27.33 498928 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 6.12 498982 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 58.31 498994 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 95.68 499103 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 23.40 499115 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 22.08 499202 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 19.23 499251 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 30.30 499305 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 57.59 499362 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 39.19 499364 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 8.28 499416 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 49.13 499437 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 60.45 499458 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 36.50 499527 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 31.93 499532 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 13.65 499538 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 25.65 499546 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 110.86 499585 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 23.00 499625 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 48.08 499804 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 12.35 499859 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.08 499967 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 6.99 499970 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 (.45) 500028 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 5.25 500174 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 26.01 500182 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 64.43 500202 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.50 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 7 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 500204 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 28.21 500210 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 16.59 500235 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.58 500286 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 14.02 500308 Maintenance Paid by Check #38689 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 50.84 Vendor 4 - Dinuba Lumber Company Totals Invoices 163 $6,886.17 Vendor 341 - Dinuba Tires LLC
075212 PD #8 Paid by Check #38690 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 20.00 Vendor 341 - Dinuba Tires LLC Totals Invoices 1 $20.00
Vendor 1506 - Enterprise FM Trust
FBN4578023 Fy 22/23-Parks/L&L-Leased truck
pymnt
Paid by Check #38691 10/05/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 1,802.72 Vendor 1506 - Enterprise FM Trust Totals Invoices 1 $1,802.72 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products
17999396 Fy 22/23-Parks-Controller Paid by Check #38692 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 603.42 18028246 Fy 22/23-Parks-Commercial Valve Paid by Check #38692 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 322.05 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products Totals Invoices 2 $925.47 Vendor 18 - The Gas Company
1263155600310/22 DSC Gas 9/2 - 10/4/22 Paid by Check #38693 10/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 25.90 1620156700110/22 1390 E ELIZABETH WAY 09/02/22
-10/04/22
Paid by Check #38694 10/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 45.32 1641156700710/22 110 S COLLEGE AVE 09/02/22-
10/04/22
Paid by Check #38696 10/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 43.21 0865742471210/22 NATURAL GAS VEHICLE FUEL
09/01/22-10/01/22
Paid by Check #38695 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 8,369.28 Vendor 18 - The Gas Company Totals Invoices 4 $8,483.71 Vendor 1351 - Grant's AC & Heating Inc.
55414477 POLICE DEPARTMENT -

DIAGNOSTIC LOCAL
Paid by Check #38697 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 90.00 Vendor 1351 - Grant's AC & Heating Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $90.00 Vendor 133 - J & D Lighting & Alarm
155417 Fy 22/23-Parks-Upgrade to
cellular communicator @ KC Vista
Paid by Check #38698 10/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 191.85 Vendor 133 - J & D Lighting & Alarm Totals Invoices 1 $191.85 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co.
6030297 PD - Fire Ext. Service Annual
Maintenance
Paid by Check #38699 10/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 915.44 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co. Totals Invoices 1 $915.44
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 8 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1247 - Linda Launer
08/23/2022 B Reimb Expense-League of Calif
Cities Conf. 09/06/22 to 09/09/22
Paid by Check #38700 08/23/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 173.91 Vendor 1247 - Linda Launer Totals Invoices 1 $173.91
Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California 55100294188 PD24 Paid by Check #38701 10/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 776.44 Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California Totals Invoices 1 $776.44 Vendor 1030 - Angelica Molina
102422 Anahiem CACEO Annual Seminar Oct 24-
Oct 27, 2022
Paid by Check #38726 10/20/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 181.00 Vendor 1030 - Angelica Molina Totals Invoices 1 $181.00 Vendor 884 - Napa Auto Parts
60495 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 14.86 60592 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/02/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 36.55 60694 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 96.17 60754 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10.14 60761 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 901.65 60805 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 25.69 60870 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18.43 60903 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 115.52 60904 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 134.31 60928 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 52.31 60991 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/08/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 270.34 61062 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/09/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 19.51 61067 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/09/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 15.79 61083 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/09/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 50.56 61127 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 127.80 61217 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 286.31 61251 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 779.08 61252 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 846.57 61262 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 127.80 61387 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 23.86 61796 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/23/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 363.72 61839 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/23/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 36.55 61964 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 33.62 61977 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 146.43 61979 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 68.02 61983 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/27/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 18.43 61838 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 127.80 62036 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 104.66 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 9 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 62039 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 127.80 62104 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/28/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 57.46 62117 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 3.04 62120 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 479.29 62136 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 520.52 62141 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 (479.29) 62148 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 331.04 62213 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 22.85 62248 Vehicles Paid by Check #38702 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 168.06 Vendor 884 - Napa Auto Parts Totals Invoices 37 $6,083.25 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD
271418115001 PD - Supplies Paid by Check #38703 10/06/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 325.24 265764878001 Office Depot Supplies Paid by Check #38703 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 296.95 268448920001 Office Depot Supplies Paid by Check #38703 09/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 62.84 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD Totals Invoices 3 $685.03 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera
10/04/2022 Anthem Reimb 11/01/2022-
11/30/2022
Paid by Check #38704 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 92.00 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera Totals Invoices 1 $92.00
Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
9624769219510/22 225 S L ST 09/08/22-10/06/22 Paid by Check #38706 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 252.92 575149843769.22 Parks 139 N K ST 08/03/22-
09/28/22
Paid by Check #38705 10/04/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 40.30 5683054506910/22 PD - 09/08/2022 - 10/06/2022
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #38707 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 6,802.67 4475716051810/22 180 W Merced STE A Paid by Check #38708 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 748.08 7681012419810/22 180 W Merced STE C Paid by Check #38710 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 47.21 9750865237310/22 180 W Merced STE B Paid by Check #38709 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 79.52 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 6 $7,970.70 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services
10/22 for 9/22 October 2022 Payment for
September 2022 Monthly Disposal
Charges
Paid by Check #38711 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 129,790.88 November 2022 November 2022 Disposal Contract
Payment
Paid by Check #38711 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 60,000.00 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services Totals Invoices 2 $189,790.88 Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System
RIS-POSO2-42622 Fy 22/23-L&L-Tee, coupling,
wedge, pvc
Paid by Check #38712 10/14/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/17/2022 10/21/2022 282.50 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 10 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System Totals Invoices 1 $282.50 Vendor 124 - Reedley Veterinary Hospital
98 PD - Veterinary Service &
September Disposal Fee
Paid by Check #38713 10/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 820.00 Vendor 124 - Reedley Veterinary Hospital Totals Invoices 1 $820.00 Vendor 789 - Rockwell Engineering & Equipment Co.
21082 DEWATERING SLUDGE PUMPS #1
& #2
Paid by Check #38714 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 11,456.70 Vendor 789 - Rockwell Engineering & Equipment Co. Totals Invoices 1 $11,456.70 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts
5080520 091522 PD - Water Coolers Paid by Check #38715 09/15/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 115.75 5080520 101322 PD - Water Coolers Paid by Check #38716 10/13/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 151.74 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts Totals Invoices 2 $267.49
Vendor 247 - State Center Community College District
16893656-57 PD - Traffic Collision Investigation
Course - 09/12-09/16/22
Paid by Check #38717 10/07/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 368.00 16896007 PD - POST Supervisor Course
09/12/22 - 09/23/22 / John Jobe
Paid by Check #38717 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 302.00 16897564-65 PD - Interview & Interrogation
Techniques Training - 10/03-
10/05
Paid by Check #38717 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 131.00 Vendor 247 - State Center Community College District Totals Invoices 3 $801.00 Vendor 189 - Terminix International
425332042 PD - Pest Control Service Paid by Check #38718 09/29/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 64.00 Vendor 189 - Terminix International Totals Invoices 1 $64.00 Vendor 1304 - TJKM
0053300 TJKM Roadway Segment Safety
Impr. Design
Paid by Check #38719 09/30/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 5,856.30 Vendor 1304 - TJKM Totals Invoices 1 $5,856.30
Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center
1609 PD - K9 Maintenance Enzo & Zeus Paid by Check #38720 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 180.00 Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center Totals Invoices 1 $180.00 Vendor 49 - Tulare County
19315 Engraving (A Arroyo, HR Tech) Paid by Check #38721 08/26/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 21.55 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 1 $21.55
Vendor 1702 - US Bank Corporate Payment System
0839 10/11/2022 MARIA Paid by EFT #2186 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 493.17 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 11 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 7832 10/11/2022 DANIEL Paid by EFT #2185 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 960.17 3091 10/11/2022 KARINA Paid by EFT #2184 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,706.60 1829 10/11/2022 Dustin Paid by EFT #2168 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,209.02 3437 10/11/2022 FD Paid by EFT #2169 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 324.17 4210 10/11/2022 Michelle Paid by EFT #2167 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 (24.23) 6510 10/11/22 Joanne Paid by EFT #2171 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 881.49 6604 10/11/2022 Jordan Paid by EFT #2170 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 225.40 0524 10/11/2022 CYNTHIA Paid by EFT #2172 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 201.08 0678 10/11/2022 JOE Paid by EFT #2173 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 211.18 0745 10/11/2022 RECREATION Paid by EFT #2174 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 101.45 3780 10/11/2022 ELIJAH Paid by EFT #2178 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,027.98 4533 10/11/2022 STEPHANIE Paid by EFT #2179 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 641.60 4970 10/11/2022 MICHELE Paid by EFT #2180 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 231.69 6510 10/11/2022 CECILIA Paid by EFT #2181 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 140.52 4668 10/11/2022 POLICE Paid by EFT #2187 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 771.53 6874 10/11/2022 LUZ Paid by EFT #2190 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,713.26 7530 10/11/2022 RUSSELL Paid by EFT #2188 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 140.98 8971 10/11/2022 ABEL Paid by EFT #2189 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 422.94 0961 10/11/2022 RUBEN Paid by EFT #2176 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,871.30 2779 10/11/2022 ISMAEL Paid by EFT #2175 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 59.48 3593 10/11/2022 PUBLIC WORKS Paid by EFT #2177 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,435.60 6020 10/11/2022 DENIS Paid by EFT #2191 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 554.34 6999 10/11/2022 STEVE Paid by EFT #2182 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,917.37 8962 10/11/2022 ELVA Paid by EFT #2183 10/11/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 1,832.16 Vendor 1702 - US Bank Corporate Payment System Totals Invoices 25 $21,050.25 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless
9917811096 PD - 09/11/2022 - 10/10/2022
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #38722 10/10/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 2,024.96 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless Totals Invoices 1 $2,024.96 Vendor 27 - The Visalia Times Delta
TD0054706 10/22 PD - 10/01/22 - 10/31/2022
Service
Paid by Check #38723 10/01/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 35.00 Vendor 27 - The Visalia Times Delta Totals Invoices 1 $35.00 Vendor 14 - W & E Electric
2209049 DINUBA PD BYPASS BREAK

ROOM LIGHT SENSOR
Paid by Check #38724 09/19/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 100.00 Vendor 14 - W & E Electric Totals Invoices 1 $100.00
Vendor Lori Castillo
Refund fees Fy 22/23-Refund for N. Castillo
not eligible to play
Paid by Check #38725 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 10/21/2022 10/12/2022 10/21/2022 42.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 12 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor Lori Castillo Totals Invoices 1 $42.00
Grand Totals Invoices 337 $375,648.07
Run by Rosemary Silva on 10/21/2022 11:48:41 AM Page 13 of 13 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 10/15/22 - 10/21/22
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
City Council Staff Report
Department: ENGINEER/PLANNING October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Watts, City Engineer
Subject: Authorization to Purchase Entertainment Plaza Restroom (JW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council authorize the Parks Director to purchase the Entertainment Plaza Restroom in amount of $163,505.00 from LB Foster.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Entertainment Plaza is actively used during the summer months for Farmer's Market and Hot Summer Night Light as well as the annual Cruise Night and Concert. The City of Dinuba was awarded a Parks and Recreation grant from the State to install a much needed restroom at the Entertainment Plaza. The restroom location was dictated as part of a schematic design prepared by Sierra Designs during the preparation of the Parks Masterplan (See Attachment 'A').

LB Foster provided the quote of $163,505 and staff is seeking approval to purchase.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None

DISCUSSION
The City received a $177,952 Parks and Recreation Grant for the installation of a restroom at the Entertainment Plaza as part of a strategy to revitalize downtown. The Entertainment Plaza is actively used for various activities and is in need of a restroom to satisfy the current events that are occurring at this location.

City Staff has talked internally and with LB Foster regarding the necessary elements the City will need to have on the future restroom in order to combat potential graffiti, homeless, and other various elements that could affect the overall integrity of the restroom. Some of the current items included in the proposal are stainless steel restroom facilities, electric hand dryers, pre-cast concrete roof and walls, skylight, battery door locks, anti graffiti coating, and many other items that will contribute to the longevity of the restroom.

The City evaluated several models and determined that a 4-door Dakota CXT Restroom (3 restrooms and 1 storage room) was the best choice. A picture of a similar 4-Door Dakota Restroom was provided as Attachment 'B'. The actual color of the restroom will match the Movie Theater and the brick will match the brick currently being used at the Ridge Creek Golf Course. Staff solicited a proposal from LB Foster and in response received a quote in the amount of $163,505. A copy of the quote is enclosed herein as Attachment 'C'. LB Foster is offering this proposal through the Sourcewell purchasing cooperative. Using this purchasing cooperative allows the City to "piggyback" on competitively procured contracts. This expedites the purchase process and ensures that the City is getting the best price for this large investment. Purchases using a purchasing cooperative are authorized in the City's purchasing policy.

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact. The City will be using grant funding to purchase the restroom.

PUBLIC HEARING
None
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Entertainment Plaza Master Plan Schematic Design
B. 4-Door Dakota Restroom
C. LB Foster Proposal
Entertainment Plaza
Moments of Joy
Schematic Design
February 8, 2022
Site Plan
Farmers Market Layout
Site Plan
Entertainment Area
Entertainment Area
Stage
Citizen’s Row
Main Entrance
Citizen’s Row
Main Entrance
Leisure Zone
Paseo Area
Leisure Zone
Paseo Area
Leisure Zone
Mist Feature on existent Splash Pad
Leisure Zone
Mist Feature on existent Splash Pad
Leisure Zone
Dinuba Letters
Leisure Zone
Dinuba Letters
Family / Kid Zone
Family / Kid Zone
Monument Area
Monument Area
Burt Rutan’s Plane
Entertainment Plaza
Moments of Joy
February 8, 2022

CXT® Precast Concrete Products manufactures restroom, shower and concession buildings in multiple designs, textures and colors. The roof and walls are fabricated with high strength precast concrete to meet all local building codes and textured to match local architectural details. All CXT buildings are designed to meet A.D.A. and to withstand heavy snow, high wind and category E seismic loads. All concrete construction also makes the buildings easy to maintain and withstand the rigors of vandalism. The buildings are prefabricated and delivered complete and ready-to- use, including plumbing and electrical where applicable. With thousands of satisfied customers nationwide, CXT is the leader in prefabricated concrete restrooms.

1. ORDERING ADDRESS(ES): CXT Precast Concrete Products, 606 N. Pines Road, Suite 202, Spokane Valley, WA 99206

2. ORDERING PROCEDURES: Fax 509-928-8270

3. PAYMENT ADDRESS(ES):

Remitting by check:

CXT, Inc., PO Box 676208, Dallas, TX 75267-6208
Remitting by ACH or wire transfer:

Beneficiary: CXT, Inc.

Beneficiary Bank: PNC Bank, Pittsburgh, PA
Account: 1077766885 ABA/Routing: 043000096
Email remittance details to [email protected]

4. WARRANTY PROVISIONS: CXT provides a one (1) year warranty. The warranty is valid only when concrete is used within the specified loadings.

Furthermore, said warranty includes only the related material necessary for the construction and fabrication of said concrete components.

All other non-concrete components will carry a one (1) year warranty.

CXT warrants that all goods sold pursuant hereto will, when delivered, conform to specifications set forth above. Goods shall be deemed accepted and meeting specifications unless notice identifying the nature of any non-conformity is provided to CXT in writing within the specified warranty. CXT, at its option, will repair or replace the goods or issue credit for the customer provided CXT is first given the opportunity to inspect such goods. It is specifically understood that CXT’s obligation hereunder isfor credit, repair or replacement only, F.O.B. CXT’s manufacturing plants, and does not include shipping, handling, installation or other incidental or consequential costs unless otherwise agreed to in writing by CXT. This warranty shall not apply to:

1. Any goods which have been repaired or altered without CXT’s express written consent, in such a way as in the reasonable judgment of CXT, to adversely affect the stability or reliability thereof;

2. To any goods which have been subject to misuse, negligence, acts of God or accidents; or

3. To any goods which have not been installed to manufacturer’s specifications and guidelines, improperly maintained, or used outside of the specifications for which such goods were designed.

5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF INSTALLATION (IF APPLICABLE): All prices subject to the “Conditions of Sale” listed on the CXT quotation form.

Customers are responsible for marking exact location building is to be set; providing clear and level site, free of overhead and/or underground obstructions; and providing site accessible to normal highway trucks and sufficient area for the crane to install and other equipment to perform the contract requirements. Customer shall provide notice in writing of low bridges, roadway width or grade, unimproved roads or any other possible obstacles to access. CXT reserves the right to charge the customer for additional costs incurred for special equipment required to perform

ORDERING INFORMATION
delivery and installation. Customers will negotiate installation on a projectby-project basis, which shall be priced as separate line items. For more information regarding installation and truck turning radius guidelines please see our website at http://www.cxtinc.com.

In the event delivery of the building/s ordered is/are not completed within 30 days of the agreed to schedule through no fault of CXT, an invoice for the full contract value (excluding shipping and installation costs) will be submitted for payment. Delivery and installation charges will be invoiced at the time of delivery and installation.

Should the delivery and installation costs increase due to changes in the delivery period, this increase will be added to the price originally quoted, and will be subject to the contract payment terms.

In the event that the delivery is delayed more than 90 days after the agreed to schedule and through no fault of CXT, then in addition to the remedies above, a storage fee of 1-½% of contract price per month or any part of any month will be charged.
**Customer is responsible for all local permits and fees.

6. DELIVERY CHARGE: All prices F.O.B. origin prepaid and added to invoice.

CXT operates three (3) manufacturing plants in the United States and will deliver from the closest location on our carriers.

7. PAYMENT TERMS: Payment to CXT by the purchaser shall be made net 30 days after submission of the invoice to the purchaser on approved credit.

Interest at a rate equal to the lower of (i) the highest rate permitted by law; or (ii) 1.5% per month will be charged monthly on all unpaid invoices beginning with the 35th day (includes five (5) day grace period) from the date of the invoice. Under no circumstance can retention be taken. If CXT initiates legal proceeding to collect any unpaid amount, purchaser shall be liable for all of CXT’s costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees and costs of any appeal.

8. LIMITATION OF REMEDIES: In the event of any breach of any obligations hereunder; breach of any warranty regarding the goods, or any negligent act or omission of any party, the parties agree to submit all claims to binding arbitration. Any settlement reached shall include all reasonable costs including attorney fees. In no event shall CXT be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages. Without limitation on the foregoing, in no event shall CXT be liable for damages in excess of the purchase price of the goods herein offered.

9. DELIVERY INFORMATION: All prices F.O.B. origin prepaid and added to invoice. CXT operates three (3) manufacturing plants in the United States and will deliver from the closest location on our carriers. Use the information below to determine the origin:
• F.O.B. 6701 E. Flamingo Avenue, Building 300, Nampa, ID 83687 applies to: AK, CA, HI, ID, MT, ND, NV, OR, SD, UT, WA, WY.
• F.O.B. 901 North Highway 77, Hillsboro, TX 76645 applies to AR, AZ, CO, IA, KS, LA, MN, MO, MS, NE, NM, OK, TX.
• F.O.B. 362 Waverly Road, Williamstown, WV 26183 applies to AL, CT, DE,

FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, PR, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, WI, WV.
• Prices exclude all federal/state/local taxes. Tax will be charged where applicable if customer is unable to provide proof of exemption.

Rev. 05/11/2022
Contract #081721-CXT
Estimated monthly payment on 5 year lease
Qty:

Qty:

Qty:

Qty:
11' x 26'
Engineering and State Fees:
$
(Quote):

Dakota with chase restroom building.

Standard features include simulated
barnwood texture walls, simulated cedar
shake textured roof, vitreous china
xtures, 4-gallon water heater, interior
and exterior lights, o
loaded, and set up
at site.
($4,000) ($4,000)
Electric Hand Dryer (each) Qty:

Estimated Tax:

Member Name
& Number

OPTIONS
Exterior Color Options (For single color mark an X. For two-tone combinations use W = Walls and R = Roof.) Amber Rose Liberty Tan Berry Mauve Sage Green
Toasted Almond Oatmeal Buff Buckskin Rosewood
Sun Bronze Golden Beige Mocha Caramel Malibu Taupe
Sand Beige Natural Honey Salsa Red Java Brown
Pueblo Gold Cappuccino Cream Coca Milk Raven Black
Granite Rock Georgia Brick Western Wheat Nuss Brown
Rich Earth Charcoal Grey Hunter Green Evergreen
Special roof color #
Special wall color #
Special trim color #
Rock Color Options
Basalt Mountain Blend Natural Grey Romana
Roof Texture Options
Cedar Shake Ribbed Metal
Wall Texture Options (For single color mark an X. For top and bottom textures use T = Top and B = Bottom.) Barnwood Horizontal Lap Can only be used as bottom texture Split Face Block Board & Batt Napa Valley Rock River Rock Stucco/Skip Trowel Brick Flagstone
(Textures not included in CXT’s quote are additional cost.) Privacy ADA Latch Pull Handle/Push Plate
CXT supplied
Door Opener Options
Non-locking ADA Handle
Deadbolt Option
Accessible Signage Options
Men Women Unisex
Toilet Paper Holder Options
2-Roll Stainless Steel 3-Roll Stainless Steel
Notes: cxtinc.com
800.696.5766
City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY CLERK October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Subject: Cancellation or Rescheduling of November 8, 2022 City Council Meeting (MA)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to consider cancellation or rescheduling of the November 8, 2022, City Council meeting due to the general election.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 2022 General Election will be held the same day as the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. The Council may wish to cancel or reschedule this meeting due to the general election.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 is on the same day as the 2022 General Election. The Council may wish to cancel the regularly scheduled meeting in order to ease conflicting schedules concerning the election that evening.

If the meeting is cancelled, any items for action by the City Council will be scheduled for the November 22, 2022 agenda.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

City Council Staff Report
Department: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES October 25, 2022 To: Mayor and City Council
From: Stephanie Hurtado, Parks and Community Services Director Subject: Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee Donation to fund Commemorative Seating Area at Rose Ann Vuich Park (SH)

RECOMMENDATION
Council receives information regarding a community donation in the amount of $4,000 from the Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee for the installation of a seating area at Rose Ann Vuich Park.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee would like to commemorate the Sister City Program by funding the installation of two benches at Rose Ann Vuich Park.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
In 1976 the Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee was formed as part the sister city relationship with Malsch, Germany. This sister city program linked Dinuba and Malsch together for the purposes of cultural exchange, a broadbased learning, and friendships. The committee would like to donate $4,000 in funds to commemorate this sister city relationship by installing a seating area at Rose Ann Vuich Park.

The seating areas consist of a concrete slab with two benches located under a grouping of trees as reflected in the photoshopped image enclosed as Attachment 'A'. Each bench will have one of the city seals and a plaque in the middle uniting both cities.

City staff support this beautification project and feel it will be a great addition to the park. Staff plan to add landscaping and possibly some solar lighting to beautify this area for residents to enjoy. The cost of this project totals $4,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
The $4,000 donation from the Dinuba/Malsch Sister City Committee will cover the cost of the concrete slab, two benches and plaques.

PUBLIC HEARING
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Sister City Commemorative Project

City Council Staff Report
Department: ENGINEER/PLANNING October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Watts, City Engineer
Subject: Roundabout Feasibility Study (JW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept staffs recommendation on starting the environmental and design process for a roundabout located at the intersection of Road 56 and El Monte Way (Avenue 416).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In January 2020 the City of Dinuba was approached by TCAG to produce a Roundabout Feasibility Study in order to identify potential roundabout locations. The purpose of the study is to assess the feasibility of roundabouts at five key locations that serve as access points to the City of Dinuba and to present roundabout design concepts for the identified locations.

The five intersections that the Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study identified were El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 56, Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424), Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Kamm Avenue (Avenue 408), Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Avenue 400, and El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 92. With Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424) nearing formal acceptance and Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Kamm Avenue (Avenue 408) starting construction spring of 2023 staff identified that the next most feasible location for a roundabout would be Road 56 and El Monte Way (Avenue 416). Staff is recommending starting the environmental and design process for Road 56 and El Monte Way (Avenue 416).

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None

DISCUSSION
The City's Roundabout Feasibility Study (Attachment 'A') was prepared by 4-Creeks Inc. at the direction of City Staff and in coordination with TJKM. The study is intended to serve as a planning-level study to guide the development of roundabout designs at these intersections and be used to apply for future grant funding opportunities.

It is important to prioritize the roundabout projects that will provide the greatest community benefit first. There are a number of ways projects can be prioritized. One of the major items that help prioritize projects is identifying which roundabout locations reduce the chance of injury or fatality in the event of a collision which is the most beneficial to public safety. Using the collision history gathered by 4-Creeks, the data would show to prioritize the proposed roundabout projects in the following order.

1. El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 56

2. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Avenue 400

3. El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 92

4. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424) - Nearing Final Acceptance

5. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Kamm Avenue (Avenue 408) - Slated for Construction Spring 2023 City Council may wish to consider other factors to determine the most appropriate way to prioritize the proposed projects, but staff recommends that prioritizing public safety is the greatest and most important factor in determining roundabout locations.

Due to the success of Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424) roundabout, TCAG has reached out to City Staff about potentially fully funding the environmental and design of the next City of Dinuba Roundabout with measure R Funding. City Staff is seeking Council direction on identifying the next roundabout location. Staff is recommending proceeding with the El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 56 as the next roundabout location.

FISCAL IMPACT
Selecting the next roundabout location has no immediate fiscal impact.

PUBLIC HEARING
None
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study
Final City of Dinuba
Roundabout Feasibility Study
September 2020

Consultant:
324 S. Santa Fe, Suite A
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 802-3052
Submitted to City of Dinuba
405 E El Monte Way
Dinuba, CA 93618
(559) 591-5900

Introduction
City of Dinuba
Consultant Team:

Subconsultants:

Public Works Department
• Ismael Hernandez, Public Works Director
4-Creeks, Inc.
• David Duda, AICP, Project Manager
• Molly McDonnel, Associate Planner
• Kyle McDonald, PE, Civil Engineer
• Kevin Clow, EIT, Assistant Engineering Designer
TJKM
• Atul Patel, TE, PTOE
• Rutvij Patel, Project Manager
Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.
• Jason Watts, PE, Civil Engineer
Acknowledgments

Introduction
Table of Contents

1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Objectives of Study................................................................................................................3 Location of Project..............................................................................................................................................3 Physical and Demographic Context.........................................................................................................6 Case Studies........................................................................................................................................................7 Regulatory Context............................................................................................................................................8

2. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................20 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................22 W. El Monte & Road 56...........................................................................................................................22 E. El Monte & Road 92...........................................................................................................................23 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.............................................................................................................25 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...................................................................................................................26 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400......................................................................................................................27

3. Roundabout Design Principles.................................................................................................29 Introduction..................................................................................................................................31 Guidance Documents....................................................................................................................................31 Benefits of Roundabout Intersections......................................................................................................32 Types of Circular Intersections....................................................................................................................34 Key Roundabout Features.............................................................................................................................36 Planning-Level Sizing and Space Requirements.................................................................................39 User Considerations.......................................................................................................................................41 Landscaping.......................................................................................................................................42

4. Proposed Design Concepts.................................................................................................43 Introduction..................................................................................................................................45 W. El Monte & Road 56...........................................................................................................................46 E. El Monte & Road 92...........................................................................................................................47 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.............................................................................................................48 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...................................................................................................................49 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.......................................................................................................................50 Preliminary Landscaping Concept Plan....................................................................................................51 Introduction

5. Action Plan and Implementation............................................................................................53 Feasibility Study Implementation.................................................................................................................55 Right-of-Way Acquisition...............................................................................................................................56 Environmental Review and Compliance Process...............................................................................57 Financial Plan...................................................................................................................................................58 Project Prioritization.......................................................................................................................................67 Figures, Tables, and Appendices
List of Figures
Figure 1-1. City of Dinuba regional location map.................................................................4 Figure 1-2. Proposed roundabout locations....................................................................................5 Figure 1-3. W. El Monte & Road 56, looking south.......................................................................5 Figure 1-4. E. El Monte & Road 92, looking west...................................................................5 Figure 1-5. N. Alta & Nebraska Ave, looking south.................................................................5 Figure 1-6. S. Alta & Kamm Ave, looking north..................................................................5 Figure 1-7. Cultural makeup of the City of Dinuba..........................................................................6 Figure 1-8. Age of Dinuba residents...............................................................................................6 Figure 1-9. Roundabout in Woodlake, CA.....................................................................................7 Figure 1-10. Victoria Avenue in Riverside........................................................................................7 Figure 2-1. Aerial View of W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection..................................22 Figure 2-2. W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection Location. .........................................22 Figure 2-3. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at El Monte & Road 92............................................24 Figure 2-4. Aerial View of E. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection.........................24 Figure 2-5. W. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection Location...............................................24 Figure 2-6. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection...................................................25 Figure 2-7. Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection Location....................................................25 Figure 2-8. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue.......... 25 Figure 2-9. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection....................................................26 Figure 2-10. Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection Location...........................................................................26 Figure 2-11. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue........... 27 Figure 2-12. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection...........................................28 Figure 2-13. Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection Location...........................................................28 Figure 2-14. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue & Avenue 400................................... 28 Figure 3-1. Single-lane roundabout. ...................................................................................................31 Figure 3-2. Roundabout safety features...............................................................................................32 Figure 3-3. Conflict points at roundabouts vs. traditional intersections...................................32 Figure 3-4. Vehicles waiting to enter roundabout.......................................................................33 Introduction
Figure 3-5. Example of rotary intersection........................................................................................34 Figure 3-6. Signalized roundabout in United Kingdom..............................................................34 Figure 3-7. Example of neighborhood traffic circle........................................................................34 Figure 3-8. Single-lane roundabout................................................................................................35 Figure 3-9. Multilane roundabout.....................................................................................................35 Figure 3-10. Oval central island.............................................................................................................36 Figure 3-11. Peanut-shaped central island.......................................................................................36 Figure 3-12. Single-lane roundabout..................................................................................................36 Figure 3-13. Roundabout design features.........................................................................................37 Figure 3-14. Accessible Pedestrian Crossing...................................................................................38 Figure 3-15. Large truck using truck apron on roundabout.....................................................38 Figure 3-16. Large vehicle wheel tracking......................................................................................38 Figure 3-17. Roundabout sizing graph..............................................................................................39 Figure 3-18. Entry sizing variables......................................................................................................40 Figure 3-19. Crosswalk lighting.............................................................................................................41 Figure 3-20. Truncated dome on sidewalk ramp........................................................................41 Figure 3-21. Roundabout dryscaping in Arizona.......................................................................42 Figure 3-22. Elaborate roundabout landscaping in Chico, California.......................................42 Figure 3-23. Example of public art in roundabout central island, Lansing, MI.......................42 Figure 3-24. Example of public art in central island, Sarasota, FL ......................................................42 Figure 4-1. Proposed Design Concept Locations.......................................................................45 Figure 4-2. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 56......................46 Figure 4-3. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 92.......................47 Figure 4-4. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.........48 Figure 4-5. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...............49 Figure 4-6. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.....................50 Figure 4-7. Conceptual Central Island Landscaping and Monument Signage..........52 Figure 4-8. Conceptual Splitter Island Landscaping....................................................................52 Figure 5-1. El Monte & Road 92 ROW Acquisition..............................................................56 Figure 5-2. Alta & Nebraska Ave ROW Acquisition..................................................................56 Figure 5-3. Alta & Kamm Ave ROW Acquisition..........................................................................56 Figure 5-4. Alta & Ave 400 ROW Acquisition..............................................................................56 Figure 5-5. NEPA Process....................................................................................................................57 Figure 5-5. CEQA Process...................................................................................................................58 List of Tables
Table 1. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 56......................................................23 Table 2. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 92.....................................................24 Table 3. Collision History for Alta Ave and Nebraska Avenue......................................26 Table 4. Collision History for Alta Ave and Kamm Avenue......................................................27 Table 5. Collision History for Alta Ave & Avenue 400......................................................28 Table 6. Volume Thresholds for Determining the Number of Entry Lanes Required.......40 Introduction
Table 7. ROW Acquisition Summary...........................................................................................57 Table 8. Cost Estimate Summary..............................................................................................58 Table 9. El Monte & Road 56 Cost Estimate...................................................................59 Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate..................................................................60 Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate.............................................................61 Table 12. S Alta & Kamm Avenue Cost Estimate............................................................63 Table 13. S Alta & Avenue 400 Cost Estimate...............................................................64

1. Introduction
1 2
Introduction
Introduction
Purpose and Objectives of Study
The City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study has been prepared by 4-Creeks Inc. at the direction of the City of Dinuba and in coordination with TJKM. This study was completed in accordance with tasks identified in the 1/28/2020 proposal, and within the scope of work agreed to by the City of Dinuba and by 4-Creeks, Inc. planning/engineering consultant.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of roundabout intersections at five key locations that serve as access points to the City of Dinuba and to present roundabout design concepts for these intersections.

The study will provide information on the existing conditions of these areas, review the current literature to provide an understanding of the principles involved in roundabout design, and propose design concepts for the five intersections involved in this study. The study will also identify possible funding opportunities, constraints, and estimate project costs to promote implementation of the proposed roundabouts.

This feasibility study includes the completion of the following professional services:

1. Description of existing conditions

2. Conceptual designs of each intersection with proposed roundabout (TJKM)

3. Summary of challenges and solutions with each alternative

4. Discussion of right of way or easements needed

5. Discussion of effects on the sounding property owners

6. Discussion of effects on environmental, historic, and culturally sensitive areas (work with City Planner)

7. List of potential permits required to facilitate each alternative

8. CEQA compliance and environmental determination based on coordination with City Contract Planner

9. List of Potential funding sources
Location of Project
As shown in Figure 1-1, the City of Dinuba is located in the north-western portion of Tulare County, approximately 12 miles north of the City of Visalia. The study area involves five intersections that serve as entrances into the City. Three of the proposed roundabout locations are located within City of Dinuba city limits, one is located within the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) and one is located in unincorporated Tulare County. The proposed roundabout locations are listed below and shown in Figure 1-2. • W. El Monte & Road 56
• E. El Monte & Road 92
• N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue
• S. Alta & Kamm Avenue
• S. Alta & Avenue 400
3 Introduction
Introduction
Figure 1-1. City of Dinuba regional location map.
4 Introduction
Figure 1-2. Proposed roundabout locations.
5 Figure 1-3. W. El Monte & Road 56, looking south.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-4. E. El Monte & Road 92, looking west.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-5. N. Alta & Nebraska Ave, looking south.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-6. S. Alta & Kamm Ave, looking north.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Introduction
Introduction
Physical and Demographic Context
Diversity
According to the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program, the City of Dinuba has a population of approximately 24,316 as of July 2018. Of that population, 86.9% is Hispanic or Latino, 10.0% is White,

2.3% is Asian, 0.5% is Native American , and 0.4% is Black or African American. 66% of residents speak Spanish at home. Of the approximately 16,000 Spanish speakers, approximately 39% reported speaking English less than “very well.”
Economy
The medium household income in the City of Dinuba is $42,145, which falls below the medium income of California and the United States ($67,739 and $57,617, respectively). Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting are the primary driver of economic activity in Tulare County, and employ approximately 19.6 times more individuals than what is expected for a county this size.

Age
The median age of all residents of the City of Dinuba is 27.3 years years. 35% of all residents are under the age of 18, which is a high percentage when compared to California’s overall average of 22.9%. A graph showing the age distribution of Dinuba residents is shown in Figure 1-8.

Future Growth
The City of Dinuba is projected to grow to more than 34,000 residents by 2026. The City’s General Plan identifies a 3% annual growth rate for the City. Future growth is planned for the west and southern areas of town. This growth is expected to lead to an increase in traffic volumes in and around the City of Dinuba.

Figure 1-7. Cultural makeup of the City of
Dinuba. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau
Figure 1-8. Age of Dinuba residents. Source: 2018 ACS
6 86.9%

10.0%

2.3% 0.8%
Hispanic or Latino
White
Asian
Other
Introduction
Introduction
Case Studies
Roundabouts have been implemented in many communities throughout California due to their ability to improve safety and traffic flow. Roundabouts are becoming increasingly common in the central valley where they are gaining popularity among central valley drivers as more drivers become accustomed to using them. The roundabouts in the City of Dinuba and the City of Reedley, discussed below, are helpful examples that demonstrate successful implementation of roundabout designs in central valley cities.

Valencia Boulevard & Naranjo Boulevard - Woodlake, CA
The roundabout in Woodlake, CA was part of a multi-phased Downtown Enhancement Project and provides an enhanced entrance into the City of Woodlake downtown area. The single-lane, urban roundabout is located at the intersection of Valencia (SR 245) and Naranjo Boulevards (SR 216), which was previously controlled using traffic lights. The roundabout includes a Class II bike lane and multi-use pedestrian and bicycle path to increase accessibility and safety for multi-modal users. The roundabout was ultimately successful in reducing traffic congestion and increasing pedestrian and cyclist mobility.

E Dinuba Avenue & S Buttonwillow Avenue - Reedley, CA
The roundabout in Reedley, CA is located approximately three miles north-west of the City of Dinuba at the intersection of E. Dinuba Avenue and S. Buttonwillow Avenue. The single-lane roundabout replaced a traditional four-way controlled intersection and serves as an entrance into the City of Reedley. The roundabout uses low-profile landscaping to ensure clear sight distances and includes sidewalks and crosswalks for pedestrian connectivity.

Figure 1-9. Roundabout in Woodlake, CA Figure 1-10. Victoria Avenue in Riverside 7 Introduction
Regulatory Context
Federal
National Environmental Policy Act
Any project undertaken on the recommendation of this document may meet the definition of a “project” under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and will be subject to NEPA review if the project receives Federal funding. The City of Dinuba is considered the Lead Agency under NEPA, and thus is obligated to honestly determine whether or not the project is subject to NEPA. If it is, the City of Dinuba must commence with the appropriate level of environmental assessment as stated by NEPA and the various Federal Guidelines adopted to implement the act. The determinations under NEPA that the the City of Dinuba can make as Lead Agency are as follows:

1. The implementation project is not a “federal action” as defined by NEPA, 24 CFR 1508.18 and therefore is not subject to further review under NEPA;

2. The implementation is a Categorically Excluded project pursuant to Federal Guidelines;

3. The implementation project is subject to further environmental study requiring the preparation of an Environmental Assessment pursuant to applicable NEPA Guidelines.

4. Following the NEPA Environmental Assessment, a project will require one of the following environmental documents:
i. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), a document finding the project will not result in significant impacts on the environment, or
ii. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), a document which conducts an in-depth study of potential environmental impacts from the proposed project and recommends mitigation measures and project alternatives. An EIS is the highest order environmental analysis that can be performed under NEPA.

State
California Environmental Quality Act
Any project undertaken on the recommendation of this document may meet the definition of a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Dinuba is the Lead Agency under CEQA, and thus is obligated to honestly determine whether or not the project is subject to CEQA. If it is, the City of Dinuba must commence with the appropriate level of environmental assessment as stated by CEQA and the various State and local Guidelines adopted to implement the act. The determinations under CEQA that the City of Dinuba can make as Lead Agency are as follows:
8 Introduction

1. The implementation project is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, Guidelines Section 1 5 3 78 and therefore is not subject to further review under CEQA;

2. The implementation project is a Categorically Exempt project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15354 and 15300-15333, or is a Categorically Excluded project pursuant to Federal Guidelines;

3. The implementation project is subject to further environmental study requiring the preparation of an Initial Study pursuant to applicable CEQA Guidelines.

4. Following the outcome of the CEQA Initial Study the Lead Agency must cause the preparation of one of the following

5. Environmental documents supported by substantial evidence:
a. Negative Declaration (ND) a document finding the project will not result in significant impacts on the environment;
b. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) a document finding potential significant impact(s) from the project and citing mitigation measure(s) to reduce impacts to less than significant levels, or that will avoid the impacts. Said mitigation measures must be agreed to by proponent/ applicant prior to public hearing taking action to approve the project, or; c. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is the highest order of environmental analysis that can be required under CEQA. An EIR requires a public hearing on the project and an in-depth analysis of potential Environmental Impacts.

Complete Streets Act
The Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) was signed into law by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in September 2008. The law requires cities and counties to ensure that all circulation planning accounts for the needs of all roadway users. Specifically, the law requires cities and counties to ensure that local roads and streets accommodate the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit riders, as well as motorists.

California Department of Transportation 2015-2020 Strategic Management Plan The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) views all transportation improvements as an opportunity to improve sustainability, livability, and the economy. The department of transportation has identified five goals with specific objectives, performance measures, and targets in its 2015-2020 Strategic Management Plan. The outline of these specific goals and objectives are contained in the following section. 9 Introduction
Goal 1: Safety and Health
Provide a safe transportation system for workers and users and promote health through active transportation and reduced pollution in communities
Goal 2: Stewardship and Efficiency
Money counts. Responsibility manage California’s transportation-related assets Goal 3: Sustainability, Livability and Economy
Make long-lasting, smart mobility decisions that improve the environment, support a vibrant economy, and build communities, not sprawl.

Goal 4: System Performance
Utilize leadership, collaboration, and strategic partnerships to develop and integrated transportation system that provides reliable and accessible mobility for travelers.

Goal 5: Organizational Excellence
Be a national leader in delivering quality service through excellent employee performance, public communication, and accountability
California Highway Design Manual (2016)
The California Highway Design Manual (HDM) establishes uniform policies and procedure to carry out the design, implementation and operation of highways for Caltrans, but its guidelines also apply to local streets.

It is updated periodically with the most recent revision related in 2016.

California Department of Transportation Bikeway Classification Class I bikeway: Bike paths or shared use paths, also referred to as “Class I bikeways,” which provide a completely separated right-of-way designed for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflows by motorists minimized.

Class II bikeway: Bike lanes, also referred to as “Class II bikeways,” that provide a restricted right-of-way designed for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of cyclists with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicles parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.

Class III bikeway: Bike routes referred to as “Class III bikeways” provide a right-of-way onstreet or off-street, designated by signs and permanent markings and shared with pedestrians and motorist.

Class IV bikeway: Cycle tracks or separated bikeways, referred to as “Class IV bikeways,” that promote active transportation and provide a right-of-way designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to a roadway and are separated from vehicular traffic. These types of separation 10 Introduction
include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, or on street parking.

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014) The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) is the guide to all pavement markings and signs used for traffic control on California streets. It is a state-specific version of the national MUTCD updated every few years. Guidance on roundabout markings and signage is provided in Section 2B.

FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2000)
The FHWA report “Roundabouts: an Informational Guide” was published in June 2000 and provides a comprehensive guide to roundabout site selection and design. The guide addresses the wide range of potential applications of roundabout intersections and addresses topics such as teh definition of a roundabout, what distinguishes roundabouts from traffic circles, public acceptance and legal issues associated with roundabouts, consideration of all user models, etc.

Local
Tulare County General Plan
The Transportation and Circulation section of the Tulare County General Plan document outlines goals and policies to facilities a functional circulation system within Tulare County. In an effort to improve the circulation and mobility throughout Tulare County, multi-modal and complete street goals and polices are incorporated into the Transportation and Circulation element of the Tulare County General Plan.

The goal of this element is to promote an efficient roadway and highway system for the movement of people and goods, which enhances the physical, economic, and social environment while being safe, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective. The following further explains the Tulare County General Plan’s list of policies below. This feasibility study is consistent with the General Plan’s policies.

TC-1.1 Provision of an Adequate Public Road Network
The County shall establish and maintain a public road network comprised of the major facilities illustrated on the Tulare County Road Systems to accommodate projected growth in traffic volume.

TC-1.2 County Improvement Standards
The County’s public roadway system shall be built and maintained consistent with adopted County Improvement Standards, and the need and function of each roadway, within constraints of funding capacity.

TC-1.3 Regional Coordination
The County shall continue to work with State, regional, and local agencies to assess transportation needs and goals and support coordinated transportation planning and programming with the Tulare County 11 Introduction
Association of Governments (TCAG) and other local agencies.

TC-1.4 Funding Sources
The County shall work to enhance funding available for transportation projects. This includes:

1. Working with TCAG, Federal and State agencies, and other available funding sources to maximize funding available to the County for transportation projects and programs, and

2. Enhance local funding sources, including assessment of transportation impact fees to pay for appropriate construction, enhancement, and maintenance of transportation facilities TC-1.5 Public Road System Maintenance
The County shall give priority for maintenance to roadways identified by the Tulare County Pavement Management System (PMS) and other inputs relevant to maintaining the safety and integrity of the County roadway system.

TC-1.6 Intermodal Connectivity
The County shall ensure that, whenever possible, roadway, highway, and public transit systems will interconnect with other modes of transportation. Specifically, the County shall encourage the interaction of truck, rail, and air-freight/passenger movements.

TC-1.7 Intermodal Freight Villages
The County shall consider the appropriate placement of intermodal freight villages in locations within the Regional Growth Corridors.

TC-1.8 Promoting Operational Efficiency
The County shall give consideration to transportation programs that improve the operational efficiency of goods movement, especially those that enhance farm-to-market connectivity.

TC-1.11 Regionally Significant Intersections
To enhance safety and efficiency, the County shall work to limit the frequency of intersections along regionally-significant corridors.

TC-1.12 Scenic Highways and Roads
The County shall work with appropriate agencies to support the designation of scenic highways and roads in the County.

TC-1.13 Land Dedication for Roadways and Other Travel Modes As required to meet the adopted County Improvement Standards, the County shall require, where warranted, an irrevocable offer of dedication to the right-of-way for roadways and other travel modes, as part of the development review process.
12 Introduction
TC-1.14 Roadway Facilities
As part of the development review process, new development shall be conditioned to fund, through impact fees, tonnage fees, and/or other mechanism, the construction and maintenance of roadway facilities impacted by the project. As projects or locations warrant, construction or payment of prorated fees for planned road facilities may also be required as a condition of approval.

TC-1.16 County Level of Service (LOS) Standards
The County shall strive to develop and manage its roadway system (both segments and intersections) to meet a LOS of “D” or better in accordance with the LOS definitions established by the Highway Capacity Manual.

City of Dinuba General Plan
The purpose of the Circulation Element of the City of Dinuba General Plan is to guide the continued development and improvement of the circulation system to support existing and planned development in the City of Dinuba and to establish acceptable roadway service levels and identify improvements required to maintain the service levels.

The City of Dinuba General Plan contains the following Objectives and Policies related to the proposed project:

2.1 Roadway Classification, Standards
Objective A. Develop a circulation network of local roads, collectors, arterials that will meet projected traffic needs.

Objective B. Maintain a roadway level of service (LOS) of C or better on Local, Minor Collector, Collector and Arterial streets.
• Policy 2.1 All street and roadway improvements shall be in conformance with the Circulation Plan contained in the General Plan Map (reference map pocket). • Policy 2.5 The design of arterials, collectors, minor collectors, and local streets shall comply with the Standard Drawings and Specifications Manual of the City of Dinuba, as amended.

Arterials
• Policy 2.8 Alta and El Monte shall be developed with a minimum right-of-way of between 104’- 119’, to include four travel lanes, parking and/or bicycle lanes, and a two-way left center turn lane or landscaped median. Where widening these two arterials is neither feasible or practical, the right or way shall remain 96 feet. Other arterials (Kamm, Crawford, Nebraska, Road 72, Road 64 and Road 96) shall be developed with a minimum right-of-way of 104 feet, to include four travel lanes, parking, and a two-way left center turn lane or landscaped median. Reference Figure 2-3 of City 13 Introduction
of Dinuba General Plan.
• Policy 2.9 The primary purpose of arterials is to carry traffic. Parking should be prohibited on new arterials and discouraged along existing arterials as deemed appropriate by the City Council and as traffic safety conditions warrant.
• Policy 2.10 Arterials shall be built in areas where traffic demand warrants the development of this facility to meet the adopted level of service standard. • Policy 2.11 Arterial streets shall be built at a typical separation of one (1) mile. Major arterials shall be provided at two mile intervals.

Collectors
• Policy 2.12 Collectors are to be designed with an 80-94 foot right-of-way width which allows four individual travel lanes of traffic, or two lanes with a two-way left turn center lane. Minor collectors may be developed with a 58-foot right-of-way to include two travel lanes, a two-way left turn center lane, and parking. (Reference Figure 2-3 of City of Dinuba General Plan). • Policy 2.13 Collector streets shall be at approximately one-mile intervals centered between arterial streets and shall be planned to intersect with other streets so as to maximize traffic safety and discourage fast flowing-traffic through residential areas. Where possible, major arterials, minor arterials, and collectors shall form 4 leg, right angle intersections; jog, offset and skewed intersections of streets in near proximity shall be avoided where possible. • Policy 2.14 Minor collectors shall serve residential neighborhoods and provide for circulation between adjacent neighborhoods, but shall not be used to carry through traffic or high traffic volumes. Actual design and improvement to ultimate standards shall be achieved through development of small facilities by developers as areas adjoining the designated circulation system are developed, with allowance for bicycle lanes, where planned.

Other Street Standards
• Policy 2.15 Local residential street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60 (36’ minimum curb to curb) feet which allows two travel lanes, parking, a parkway strip (7’ wide), and sidewalk (4.5’ wide).
• Policy 2.16 Arterial, collector and local street standards shall be developed which provide adequate capacity for their appropriate function, and these shall be incorporated into the City’s Standard Drawings and Specifications Manual. Half streets shall not be permitted. • Policy 2.17 Local streets shall not carry an unreasonable level of through traffic. If it is determined that a local street is carrying an unacceptable level of through traffic, the City may use appropriate means to reduce traffic through creation of one way traffic flow, installation of traffic calming devices, and/or any other means deemed to be acceptable under the Vehicle Code of the State of California. Traffic calming features in conformance with Table 2-1 (see City of Dinuba General Plan) are encouraged.
• Policy 2.18 The General Plan Circulation Plan shows the street system consisting of arterials and collectors. Designated arterials and collectors are as follows:
• Policy 2.19 Median breaks and driveway standards for arterial, collector and local streets directly 14 Introduction
affect the performance of these roadways, and the following minimum standards have been developed to facilitate the proper operation of these roadways:

Arterial Street Standards
a. Driveway access to major activity centers should be located no closer than 200 feet to the adjacent intersection of a collector or arterial street. (Measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If driveways must be provided near intersections for facilities (such as service stations) these driveways shall not be serviced by median breaks and shall be located no less than 50 feet from the intersection (measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If more than one driveway is required to serve a property, the driveways shall be separated by 50 feet (The 50 feet is to be measured edge to edge, not centerline to centerline).
b. The distance between driveways along commercially developed arterials should not be less than 400 feet (measurement shall be from centerline to centerline). Where this spacing is not practical, the development shall provide acceptable traffic mitigation measures in addition to those already required.
c. Where practical and desirable, driveways should be located on adjacent collector streets rather than on arterial streets.
d. Driveway consolidation shall be encouraged through joint access agreements along arterials where standards a. through e. are exceeded.
e. Full median breaks, where there is no adopted design, should provide access to collector streets and to major activity centers and should not be less than 200 feet from an adjacent intersection of an arterial or collector street, and not less than 1,000 feet between full median breaks on major arterials.
f. Arterial streets shall include landscaping in accordance with Figure 2-3 (See City of Dinuba General Plan .

Collector Street Standards
a. Driveway access to major activity centers should be located no closer than 150 feet to the adjacent intersection of a collector or arterial street (measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If driveways must be provided near intersections for facilities (such as service stations) these driveways shall not be serviced by median breaks and shall be located no less than 50 feet from the intersection (measurement shall be from the curb return to the edge of the driveway). If more than one is requested to serve a property, the driveways shall be separated by 50 feet, measured edge to edge, not centerline to centerline. b. The distance between driveways and intersecting local streets should not be less than 300 feet. (Measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). Where this spacing is not practical, the development shall provide acceptable traffic mitigation measures in addition to those already required.
c. Driveways to residential property along collectors should be consolidated whenever possible. d. Concrete medians shall be provided on collectors where left turn control is needed and by 15 Introduction
painted medians on two way left turn pockets where appropriate. Where concrete medians are provided, median breaks should be spaced not less than 300 feet apart. e. Collectors shall include landscaping in conformance with Figure 2-3 (See City of Dinuba General Plan).
• Policy 2.20 The street network should provide a quick and effi cient route for emergency vehicles, including police, fire and other vehicles, when responding to calls for service. The length of single entry access routes shall be restricted.
• Policy 2.21 Standards for new street development can be altered or refined through the specific plan or planned unit development process where it can be demonstrated that projected traffic flows can be accommodated.
• Policy 2.23 City policy is to continue to provide a high level of service to the community. Therefore, the City designates Service Level “C” (ADT) as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council) as the minimum desirable service level at which arterial and collector streets should operate. All new facilities in these categories shall be designed to operate at this level or better for a period of at least 20 years following their construction. Level of Service “D” (peak hours) shall be deemed acceptable for those road segments and intersections which have been identified as already operating at that level.
• Policy 2.24 Traffic studies should be required, when necessary, to determine mitigation measures necessary to mitigate traffic impacts.
• Policy 2.25 Intersection improvements should be made to the existing major street system selectively through traffic engineering solutions rather than major structural improvements. This could include signalization, intersection channelization, use of directional signs, and diversion of traffic onto underutilized streets, or through sequential traffic signal timing. • Policy 2.26 City circulation system street alignments shall be coordinated with Tulare County circulation system street alignments.
• Policy 2.27 In order to promote safe and efficient traffic flow throughout the City, traffic signals shall be spaced no closer than 1/4 mile on arterials except in unusual circumstances. The intersections of arterial and collector streets and the access driveways to major traffic generators shall be located so as to maintain this minimum spacing.
• Policy 2.29 Promote the improvement of El Monte Way (Avenue 416) as the primary transportation access to the City from Highway 99. To this end, the City will cooperate with Tulare County, Fresno County, and CalTrans to prepare plan lines and secure funding for right-of-way, additional lanes, signalization, and streetscape improvements.
• Policy 2.30 The ultimate development of El Monte Way (Avenue 416) should include four travel lanes from Highway 99 through the City to Road 100.
• Policy 2.32 The circulation system shall be designed and developed to minimize excessive noise impacts on sensitive land uses and traffic congestion which would increase the rate of vehicle emissions. Development shall mitigate noise and emission impacts. 16 Introduction

2.2 Street Improvements
Objective. Protect rights-of-way for future street development by clearly defining the location of future rights-of-way and establishing street dedication requirements. Such methods should minimize adverse impacts on adjacent properties and avoid imposition of street improvement requirements significantly in advance of need.
• Policy 2.37 Establish official plan lines for all arterial and collector streets included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
• Policy 2.38 Official plan lines for El Monte Way, between Alta and Tulare, and for Alta Avenue, between El Monte and Vassar, should include potential abandonment or realignment of City streets which now intersect those streets at approximately a 45º angle. • Policy 2.40 Streets abutting new development shall be developed to handle bi-directional traffi c and at least one parking lane. Arterial half streets may be permitted when additional lanes are not necessary to support development. Half collector and local streets shall not be permitted.

2.4 Traffic Safety
Objective. Maximize the use of site planning techniques to improve traffic safety. • Policy 2.47 Provide left hand-turn lanes where necessary for access from arterials into high traffic commercial or multifamily developments.
• Policy 2.48 Project designs shall reflect options for reducing through traffic on local streets. • Policy 2.49 Promote design standards which allow for safe and efficient transport, delivery, loading and unloading of goods from service vehicles within commercial and industrial areas.

2.5 Alternative Transportation Modes
Objective. Promote the use of alternative modes of transportation • Policy 2.59 Provide reasonable accommodations for comfort and convenience for riders at major transit destinations so people can utilize the transit system safely and comfortably. The City shall determine such need based on site plan review procedure and other planning implementation methods.
• Policy 2.60 Major arterials, arterials, and collectors will be designed to allow transit vehicles to pull out of traffic. This policy may be implemented with either a continuous parking lane with bus stops, or with special bus pull out lanes.
• Policy 2.62 Encourage transit alternatives to meet the basic transportation needs of the young, the elderly, the handicapped, and individuals without access to an automobile.

2.6 Bicycle Facilities
Objective. Encourage the use of bicycles as a viable means of transportation. 17 Introduction
• Policy 2.65 The City will develop, through various funding mechanisms and sources, a city-wide bicycle/pedestrian path system. The bicycle/pedestrian path system will utilize existing or future railroad right-of-way and water courses such as Traver Creek. The path, which would be between 8 and 12 feet wide and off the roadway, could also include landscaping, lighting, mileage markers and directional signage and benches. Reference Figure 2-4 (See City of Dinuba General Plan) for the proposed bicycle/pedestrian city-wide path system.
• Policy 2.66 The City of Dinuba will work with the City of Reedley to connect the city-wide bicycle/ pedestrian trail system with a similar path system in Reedley. • Policy 2.67 Provide bikeway signage for Regional Bike Routes.

2.7 Pedestrian Facilities
Objective. Provide a safe walking environment for pedestrians. • Policy 2.70 Sidewalks, paths, and appropriate crosswalks should be located to facilitate access to all schools and other areas with significant pedestrian traffic. Whenever feasible, pedestrian paths should be developed to allow for unobstructed pedestrian flow from within a neighborhood. • Policy 2.71 Sidewalks shall be required in all areas of the community to accommodate pedestrian traffic, especially along routes with high pedestrian traffic such as schools, parks, and the Downtown area. Installation of these improvements shall be encouraged to the extent feasible in existing neighborhoods where they do not currently exist.
• Policy 2.73 Street lighting shall be provided for all public streets. • Policy 2.74 Pedestrian signals should be provided at all traffic signal locations. • Policy 2.75 Adequate sidewalk and park strip maintenance should be assured. Owners of abutting property shall be responsible for maintenance of sidewalks and park strips. City shall work to assist property owners, where possible.

2.11 Transportation System and Congestion Management
Objective A. Encourage the development of strategies for maximizing the efficiency of the existing street system.

Objective B. Promote a variety of public transit connections with other nearby cities and locations. • Policy 2.84 The City shall encourage the use of energy efficient and non polluting fuels and modes of transportation.
• Policy 2.85 Transportation System Management and Transportation Demand Management strategy should be used to mitigate traffic and parking congestion. Public transit, traffic management, ridesharing and parking management are to be used to the greatest extent practicable to implement transportation management strategies.
18 Introduction

2.13 Truck Routes and Truck Parking
Objective. Provide safe and efficient truck routes into and within the community. • Policy 2.93 Truck traffic shall be permitted on the designated arterials and collector streets only; as identified in the Circulation Element Truck Route Map (reference Figure 2-5 of City of Dinuba General Plan).
• Policy 2.94 Truck parking
a. Shall be discouraged on arterial/collector streets outside of the industrial park. b. Shall be prohibited in residential areas for vehicles in excess of 10,000 gross vehicle weight (GVW), or higher than 8 feet.
• Policy 2.95 The City shall encourage development of a truck terminal and parking facilities within the industrial park.
19 2. Existing Conditions
20 21
Existing Conditions
Introduction
Figure 2-1. Aerial View of W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection.; Source: Google Earth
Introduction
The City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study involves four existing intersections which serve as entrances into the City of Dinuba. This section will discuss the existing conditions of each intersection and the surrounding properties. The following will be included as part of this discussion:
• Street classification and ROW
• Existing and projected traffic volumes and LOS
• Collision History
• Existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
Traffic counts were provided by Metro Traffic Data Inc. Collision records for all four intersections were obtained via the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

W. El Monte & Road 56
The intersection of W. El Monte Avenue and Road 56 is located within the City of Dinuba Sphere of Influence, approximately 0.5 miles west of the City of Dinuba city limit. W. El Monte Road and Road 56 are both classified as arterial streets under the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 133’ on the west leg, 137’ on the east leg, and 80’ on the north and south legs.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural land uses with one residence located on the southwest corner.

There are no existing sidewalks, crosswalks, bicycle lanes or other pedestrian/cyclist infrastructure. Traffic counts for this intersection were not available at the time of the study due to the study’s coincidence with the COVID-19 pandemic.
22 Figure 2-2. W. El Monte Ave/Road 56
Intersection Location.

El Monte Ave
Road 56
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
Introduction
A total of 14 collisions occurred at the El Monte/Road 56 between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Of these, five accidents caused injuries and nine were property damage only (PDO). As shown in Table 1, The primary collision factor for these collisions is varied, but the most common collision factor is “unsafe speed.”
Table 1. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 56
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
2 Not Driver Hit Object PDO
3 Starting/Backing Hit Object PDO
4 Wrong Side Head-On Injury
5 Unknown Sideswipe PDO
6 Lane Change Rear End PDO
7 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
8 Lane Change Side Swipe PDO
9 Stop Sign Broadside Injury
10 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
11 Unsafe Speed Head-On Injury
12 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
13 Stop Sign Broadside Injury
14 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
E. El Monte & Road 92
The intersection of W. El Monte Avenue and Road 92 is located along the eastern city limit of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-5). El Monte Road is listed as an arterial street and Road 92 is listed as a collector street in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 50’ on the north leg, 42’ on the south leg, 112’ on the west leg, and 115’ on the east leg.

Commercial uses are located on the northeast and southeast corners of this intersection, while agricultural land uses are located on the northwest and southwest corners. Sidewalks are present along the southwest corner to provide pedestrian connectivity to the south and east. A brief segment of sidewalk exists on northeast corner along the curb return, however it does not connect to sidewalk to the east or north. Class II Bicycle lanes are present east of the intersection along El Monte Road. 23 Existing Conditions
Traffic Counts were collected on March 12,
2020. As shown in Figure 2-3, the vast majority of
users traveling through the intersection are driving
eastbound and westbound on El Monte, with few
vehicles turning north or south onto Road 92 22and
few vehicles turning from Road 92 onto El Monte.

The traffic counts also confirmed that there is very
little bicycle or pedestrian traffic at this intersection.

Two cyclists were recorded at the intersection
between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and one was
recorded between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. No
pedestrians were recorded between 7:00 AM
and 9:00 AM and one was recorded between
4:00 PM and 6:00 PM.

Figure 2-3. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at El Monte & Road 92; Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

Figure 2-5. W. El Monte Ave/Road 92
Intersection Location.

Figure 2-4. Aerial View of E. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection; Source: Google Earth
El Monte Ave
Road 92
24 Four collisions occurred between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at the intersection of El Monte and Road 92. Of these, one was fatal, one resulted in injury, and two were property damage only. Two of these collisions were due to improper turn, one was due to unsafe speed, and one was attributed to R-O-W Auto.

Table 2. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 92
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 R-O-W Auto Broadside Fatal
2 Unsafe Speed Hit Object PDO
3 Improper Turn Overturned PDO
4 Improper Turn Hit Object Injury
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
25 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue is located at the northern end of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-7). Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue are both designated as arterial streets in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. The existing ROW leading up to the intersection is 80’ on the north and south legs, 55’ on the west leg, and 60’ on the east leg.

The intersection is bordered by vacant land on the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners. There is one existing driveway approach and structure on the northeast corner. The intersection offers crosswalks across all legs of the intersection, however pavement markings to delineate crosswalks are significantly faded.

There are no sidewalks, bike lanes, or other bicycle/pedestrian features.

Figure 2-7. Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection
Location.

Figure 2-6. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Nebraska Ave
Alta Ave
Traffic Counts were collected on October 30, Introduction 2018. As shown in Figure 2-8, the vast majority of
users traveling through the intersection are driving
north or south on Alta Avenue. The traffic counts
found that many users are driving eastbound and
westbound on Nebraska Avenue. The traffic counts
reported few drivers turning from Alta Avenue onto
Nebraska Avenue or from Nebraska Avenue onto
Alta Avenue.

The traffic counts also confirmed that there is very
little bicycle or pedestrian traffic at this intersection.

Eight cyclists and eight pedestrians were recorded
at the intersection on the day of the traffic count.

Figure 2-8. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue. Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
26 Three collisions occurred at the intersection of Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue between January 1, 2014 and December 31st, 2018. All three of these collisions resulted in injuries. Stop sign/signal and driver alcohol/drug were cited as the primary collision factors for two of these collisions. The primary collision factor was not stated for the third collision.

Table 3. Collision History for Alta Ave and Nebraska Avenue Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Driver Alcohol/Drug Auto/Pedestrian Injury
2 Not Stated Broadside Injury
3 Stop Sign/Signal Broadside Injury
Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue is located in the southern portion of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-10). Kamm Avenue and Alta Avenue are both designated as arterial streets in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 105’ on the north leg, 100’ on the south leg, 50’ on the west leg, and 96’ on the east leg.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural and vacant land uses on all sides. A High School is planned on the south-west corner of the intersection, which will significantly increase traffic flow upon development.

The intersection offers crosswalks for pedestrians across the southern leg of Alta Avenue and eastern leg of Kamm Avenue. Sidewalks are present along the southeast corner to provide pedestrian connectivity to the south and east. Brief segments of sidewalk are also present along the curb returns of the northeast and southwest corners. Class II Bicycle lanes are present along the north and south legs of Alta Avenue and east of the intersection along Kamm Avenue.

Figure 2-10. Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection
Location.

Figure 2-9. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Kamm Ave
Alta Ave
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
27 Traffic Counts were collected on March 12, 2020. As
shown in Figure 2-11, the majority of users traveling through the intersection are driving north or south on Alta Avenue.

The traffic counts also reported many drivers turning right to go north onto Alta Avenue from Kamm Avenue and
many drivers turning left to go east onto Kamm Avenue
from Alta Avenue. A new high school is planned for the
southwest corner of the intersection. As such, bicycle and pedestrian is expected to be significant.

Two collisions occurred at the intersection of Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue between January 1, 2014 and
December 31, 2018. Both of these collisions resulted in injuries. Improper turn was cited as the primary collision factor for one of the collisions, however the primary
collision factor was not stated for the other.

Figure 2-11. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue &
Kamm Avenue. Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

Table 4. Collision History for Alta Ave and Kamm Avenue Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Not Stated Not Stated Injury
2 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
Alta Avenue & Avenue 400
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Avenue 400 (SR 201) is located approximately 0.75 miles south of the in the Dinuba City Limit (see Figure 2-13). Alta Avenue is designated as an arterial street by the City of Dinuba General Plan. The segment of Alta Avenue leading up to this intersection is located in unincorporated Tulare County and is designated as a minor arterial by the Tualre County General Plan.

Avenue 400 (SR) is a Caltrans route and is designated as a major collector in the Tulare County General Plan. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 140’ on the north and south legs and 65’ on the east and west legs.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural and vacant land uses on all sides. The intersection does not offer crosswalks or sidewalks and there is signage to indicate that pedestrian crossing is not allowed at this intersection. Class II Bicycle lanes are present on the north and south legs of the intersection along Alta Avenue.

Existing Conditions
28 Figure 2-13. Alta Ave/Avenue 400
Intersection Location.

Figure 2-12. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Avenue 400
Alta Ave
Traffic Counts were collected on May 17, 2017. As
shown in Figure 2-13, the majority of users traveling
through the intersection are driving north or south
on Alta Avenue. The traffic counts also reported
many drivers traveling through the intersection on
Avenue 400.

Eleven collisions occurred at the intersection of
Alta Avenue and Avenue 400 between January
1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. The primary
collision factor for a majority of these collisions
was unsafe speed and more than half resulted in
an injury.

Figure 2-14. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue &
Avenue 400. Source: National Data & Surveying Services
Table 5. Collision History for Alta Ave & Avenue 400
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
2 Driver Alcohol/Drug Hit Object Injury
3 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
4 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
5 Unsafe Speed Sideswipe PDO
6 Unsafe Speed Hit Object PDO
7 Driver Alcohol/Drug Broadside Injury
8 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
9 R-O-W Auto Head-On Injury
10 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
11 Improper Turn Hit Object Injury
City of Dinuba

3. Roundabout Design Principles
29 30
Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
31 Introduction
Thoughtful roundabout design is essential in ensuring that a roundabout can adequately serve traffic demand, accommodate the range of users, and is appropriate for a given area. Features incorporated into roundabouts can determine what types of vehicles will be able to use the roundabout, the speed at which vehicles use the roundabout, and the comfort/safety of pedestrians and cyclists using the roundabout. At its core, roundabout design involves balancing the competing factors of operational efficiency and user safety to achieve the following key objectives:
• Slow entry speeds
• The appropriate number of lanes
• Smooth channelization
• Adequate accommodation for design vehicles
• A design that meets the needs of pedestrians and cyclists • Appropriate sight distance and visibility
This section will provide an overview of roundabout design principles and discuss the elements that guided the development of the five roundabouts discussed in this Study.

Guidance Documents
Guidelines from several documents were referenced while developing the proposed roundabout designs.

These documents vary in their level of technical detail, however each provided essential information to guide the development of roundabout designs.

Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2010 NCHRP Report 672): NCHRP Report 672 was an update the the FHWA’s Roundabouts: An Informational Guide and provides a comprehensive guide to roundabout planning and design. This guide includes information on the design, use, signage, operation, and maintenance of roundabouts and discusses how the type of user should influence roundabout design.

California MUTCD 2014 Edition: The California MUTCD was last updated in 2014 by the Federal Highway Administration and provides detailed information on signage and markings for roundabout intersections. These guidelines were used to select appropriate signage and markings for the proposed roundabouts in the City of Dinuba.

Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility (2002): The Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide was published by the FHWA in 2002 and provides information on ensuring pedestrian and cyclist connectivity throughout a roundabout design. The guide also discusses roundabout accessibility for persons with disabilities.

Figure 3-1. Single-lane roundabout.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
32 Benefits of Roundabout Intersections
Safety
Several studies have shown that roundabouts are much safer than traditional intersections. According to studies by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the Federal Highway Administration, roundabouts typically provide the following safety benefits to intersections where stop signs or signals were previously used for traffic control:
• A 37 percent reduction in overall collisions
• A 75 percent reduction in injury collisions
• A 90 percent reduction in fatality collisions
• A 40 percent reduction in pedestrian collisions
These safety benefits are due to the design and
geometry of roundabout intersections. Unlike
traditional intersections, which require drivers to cross perpendicular to the flow of conflicting traffic, drivers enter a roundabout at a congruous angle that all but
eliminates T-bone and head on collisions. These are
two of the most severe collisions as they are much
more likely to result in injuries and fatalities. The curved, yield-controlled entry also serves to reduce traffic
speeds for vehicles entering the roundabout, which
reduces the occurrence and severity of collisions.

Additionally, roundabouts have fewer conflict points. A conflict point is any point where the paths of two through or turning vehicles diverge, merge, or cross and where a collision can occur. As shown in Figure 3-3, there are 32 conflict points associated with a traditional intersection while there are only 8 conflict points at an equivalent roundabout.

Figure 3-2. Roundabout safety features. Source: FHWA
Figure 3-3. Conflict points at roundabouts vs. traditional intersections.

Roundabout Design Principles
33 Traffic Flow
Research shows that roundabouts reduce traffic congestion by moving cars through an intersection more quickly than a traditional intersection. This is because roundabouts are yield-controlled intersections, meaning that traffic is not required to stop at the intersection if the roundabout is empty.

Although it may seem counterintuitive, the ability of a roundabout to slow traffic speeds actually increases the rate at which cars are able to move through the intersection because the capacity of a roundabout is greater when the speed of circulating traffic is lower. A yield-controlled intersection requires drivers to look for gaps in the traffic flow in order to enter the circulating lane. When circulating traffic flow is faster, gaps must be wider for a driver to comfortably enter. This results in fewer opportunities for drivers to enter the circulating lane. Roundabouts that effectively slow traffic create more opportunities for drivers to enter the circulating lane because the gaps in circulating traffic can be narrower.

Operation and Maintenance Costs
Roundabouts offer significant long-term cost benefits over traditional signalized intersections. Roundabouts are generally cheaper to operate because they do not require the hardware, maintenance and electrical costs associated with traffic signals, which can cost between $5,000 and $10,000 per year. Additionally, the service life of a roundabout is approximately 25 years, while the service life of a typical traffic signal is approximately 10 years.

It should be noted that initial construction costs may be higher for roundabouts than traditional signalized intersections in areas where Right-of-Way acquisition costs are high and existing Right-of-Way is not available at the road junction. Additionally, landscaping costs can be higher depending on the landscaping of the central island and splitter islands.

Figure 3-4. Vehicles waiting to enter roundabout.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
34 Types of Circular Intersection
A roundabout is a type of circular intersection in which traffic is permitted to flow in one direction around a central island. In addition to roundabouts, there are three other types of circular intersections. These are listed and defined below. These definitions are provided by the NCHRP Roundabouts: An Informational Guide.

Rotaries: An old-style circular intersection common to the United States prior to the 1960s, are characterized by a large diameter [often greater than 300 ft (100 m)]. The diameter of a rotary is primarily a consequence of the length of the weaving section required between intersection legs. Unlike the modern roundabout, lane changes are typically required within a rotary for some movements. In addition, some rotaries operate with circulating traffic yielding to entering traffic, which can create congestion on the circulatory roadway. Circulating speeds are high due to the large diameter, making maneuvers within the circle more challenging. An example of a Rotary intersection is provided in Figure 3-5)
Signalized Traffic Circles: An old-style circular intersection used in some cities in the United States where traffic signals are used to control one or more entry–circulating point. As a result, signalized traffic circles have distinctly different operational characteristics from yield controlled roundabouts, with queue storage within the circulatory roadway and progression of signals required. Signalized traffic circles are distinct from roundabouts with pedestrian signals, as the entry–circulating point at a roundabout is still governed by a yield sign. An example of a signalized traffic circle is provided in Figure 3-6) Neighborhood Traffic Circles: Circular intersections that are typically built at the intersections of local streets for reasons of traffic calming and/or aesthetics. The intersection approaches may be uncontrolled or stop-controlled. They do not typically include raised channelization to guide the approaching driver onto the circulatory roadway. At some traffic circles, left-turning movements for larger vehicles are allowed to occur in front of the central island, potentially conflicting with other circulating traffic. Exhibit 1-5 shows examples of typical neighborhood traffic circles. The example in Portland, Oregon, is an allway stop-controlled intersection; the example in Seattle, Washington, is uncontrolled. An example of a neighborhood traffic signal is provided in Figure 3-7).

Figure 3-5. Example of rotary intersection.

Figure 3-6. Signalized roundabout in United Kingdom.

Figure 3-7. Example of neighborhood traffic circle.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
35 Introduction Modern Roundabouts: Roundabouts are the fourth subset of circular intersections with specific design and traffic control features. These features include yield control of all entering traffic, channelized approaches, and geometric curvature and features to induce desired vehicular speed levels. There are three types of roundabouts discussed in the NCHRP publication Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. These are miniroundabouts, single-lane roundabouts, and multilane roundabouts. An example of each of these is shown in Figures 3-8 through 3-9. Due to the location of the proposed roundabout sites, this Feasibility Study will focus on Single-lane and multilane roundabouts.

Single-Lane Roundabouts
Single Lane Roundabouts have a single-lane of entry at
all legs and one circulatory lane around the central island.

Their design typically includes raised splitter islands, a nontransversable central island, crosswalks, and a truck apron.

Single-lane roundabouts are designed for low-speed
operation and offer the greatest level of safety for users.

Traffic speeds on single-lane roundabouts is slower
than on multilane roundabouts, which creates a more
comfortable atmosphere for cyclists and pedestrians
using the intersection. Additionally, pedestrians only need to cross one lane of traffic at a time. For drivers, singlelane roundabouts have fewer conflict points than multilane roundabouts and drivers have no lane use decisions to
make.

Multilane roundabouts
Multilane roundabouts have at least one entry with two or more lanes, and can also include roundabouts with entries on one or more approaches that flare from one to two or more lanes. The number of circulatory lanes is based upon approach lane configurations. Vehicular speeds at the entry, on the circulatory roadway, and at the exit may be slightly higher than those for the single-lane roundabouts due to the increased roadway width. Multilane roundabouts
also have more conflict points and require pedestrians to cross two lanes of traffic, making multilane roundabouts slightly less safe than single-lane roundabouts. Multilane roundabout design typically includes raised splitter islands, a non-transversable central island, a truck apron, and
appropriate entry path deflection.

Figure 3-8. Single-lane roundabout
Figure 3-9. Multilane roundabout
Roundabout Design Principles
36 Key Roundabout Features
Central Island
The main distinguishing feature of a roundabout intersection is a raised central island around which traffic flows. Central Islands control the direction of traffic and can act as an aesthetic feature. The size of central islands can vary depending on the desired speed of traffic flow. As shown in Figures 3-10 and 3-11, central islands can vary significantly in shape and size depending on the intersection’s location and context.

Figure 3-10. Oval central island. Figure 3-11. Peanut-shaped central island.

Splitter Island
A splitter island is a raised, triangle-shaped island located between entering and exiting vehicles at each two-way leg of a roundabout. Splitter islands are used to direct and slow entering and exiting traffic speeds and reduce pedestrian crossing distance by allowing pedestrians to cross one direction of traffic at a time.

Circulatory Roadway
Like the central island, the circulatory roadway is a key distinguishing feature of a roundabout intersection.

The circulatory roadway is the curved path used by vehicles to travel in a counterclockwise fashion around the central island. The radius of the central island and circulatory roadway is a key component in determining traffic speeds within the roundabout.

Entrance Line
The entrance line marks the point of entry into the
circulatory roadway. Entering vehicles must yield to
any circulating traffic before crossing this line into the circulatory roadway.

Figure 3-12. Single-lane roundabout
Roundabout Design Principles
37 Figure 3-13. Roundabout design features. Source: FHWA Roundabout Design Principles
Accessible Pedestrian Crossings
Pedestrian crossings should be provided at least 20 feet from the entrance line to give room for the vehicle to stop prior to the crosswalk but outside of the circulatory roadway. The crossing typically cuts through the splitter island at grade to allow pedestrians, wheelchairs, strollers, and bicycles to pass through. The pedestrian crossings must be accessible with detectable warnings and appropriate slopes in accordance with ADA requirements. Considerations for persons with disabilities are discussed further on page 41.

Truck Apron
A truck apron is a transversable portion of the central island adjacent to the circulatory roadway that may be needed to accommodate the wheel tracking of large vehicles. When
a large vehicle enters a turn, the rear wheels take a shorter path around the curve (see Figure 3-16). A truck apron is a raised section of concrete that helps to accommodate this off-tracking by acting as an extra lane. The back wheels of the large vehicle can ride up on the truck apron so the truck can complete the turn, while the raised portion of concrete discourages use by smaller vehicles.

Figure 3-16. Large vehicle wheel tracking.

Figure 3-14. Accessible Pedestrian Crossing
Figure 3-15. Large truck using truck apron on roundabout. 38 Roundabout Design Principles
Planning-Level Sizing and Space Requirements
Roundabout Sizing
The number of lanes a roundabout should have is determined based on existing and projected traffic volumes. The graph below provides a method for determining the number of lanes in a roundabout based on AADT and left-turn rates. This graph is only applicable at intersections where the ratio of peak-hour to daily traffic (K) is between 0.09-0.10, the direction distribution of traffic (D) is between 0.52-0.58, the ratio of minor street to total entering traffic is between 0.33-0.50, and the acceptable volume-to-capacity ratio is between 0.85-1.00.

Figure 3-17. Roundabout sizing graph. Source: NCHRP (2010) 39 Roundabout Design Principles
Table 6. Volume Thresholds for Determining the Number of Entry Lanes Required Volume Range (Ve+ Vc) Number of Lanes Required
0 - 1,000 vehicles/hour Single-lane entry likely to be sufficient 1,000 - 1,300 vehicles/hour Single-lane entry may be sufficient based upon more detailed analysis. Two-lane entry may be needed.
1,300 - 1,800 vehicles/hour Two-lane entry likely to be sufficient More than 1,8000 vehicles/hour More than two entering lanes may be required. A more detailed capacity evaluation should be conducted to verify lane numbers and arrangements.

User Considerations
Trucks
Roundabouts should be designed to accommodate the largest vehicles that will use the intersection. El Monte Avenue and Alta Avenue are both identified as Truck Routes by the City of Dinuba General Plan.

Therefore, it is critical that the roundabouts are designed to accommodate large trucks.

While roundabouts are typically designed to reduce traffic speeds (tight turning radii and narrow curbto-curb widths), designers must ensure that large vehicle drivers have the basic ability to travel through the intersection in areas where large trucks are present. Implementation of a truck apron can be helpful in accommodating the rear wheel tracking of large vehicles.

One potential obstacle to the effective use of truck aprons is lack of public knowledge. Many truck drivers do not realize that they are allowed to ride up onto the apron and that it is there specifically for that purpose.

Outreach to truck drivers is needed to ensure the apron will be used to effectively accommodate large vehicles.

Entry Sizing
The sum of entering (Ve) and conflicting (Vc) traffic
volumes (see Figure 3-17), can be used to evaluate
the number of lanes required at each entry. Table 6,
summarizes the number of lanes needed at each entry
based on the sum of these variables.

Figure 3-18. Entry sizing variables.
40 Roundabout Design Principles
Cyclists
Bicycle lanes are not recommended within the circulatory roadway of roundabouts because they have been shown to have negative impacts on cyclist safety. When bicycle lanes or shoulders are present on roads approaching the intersection, they should be terminated in advance of the roundabout.

Cyclists have the option to merge with traffic and travel through the roundabout as a “driver,” via the roundabout’s vehicular travel lanes, or exit the roadway onto the sidewalk and travel through the intersection as a “pedestrian.” In areas where higher vehicle travel speeds and/or traffic volumes are present, it is likely that more cyclists will choose to exit the roadway and use the roundabout’s sidewalks/crosswalks to move through the intersection. A bicycle ramp to facilitate movements from the bicycle lane/shoulder to the sidewalk should be provided at these locations.

Pedestrians
Roundabouts are generally safer for pedestrians than traditional intersections because traffic speeds are lower, crossing distances are shorter, and splitter islands permit pedestrians to only cross one direction of traffic at a time. Roundabouts should facilitate pedestrian connectivity by providing sidewalks on approaches and crosswalks at each leg of travel. Crosswalks should set back from the yield line by at least one car length. This allows an approaching driver to devote their attention to the crossing pedestrian while waiting for the driver ahead to enter the circulatory roadway. Additionally, this provides a shorter crossing distance when compared to a crossing directly adjacent to the circulatory roadway.

Visually Impaired
Unlike traditional stop or signal controlled intersections, yield controlled intersections require pedestrians to make decisions based on gaps in traffic flow. This presents a unique challenge for individuals with visual disabilities who must decide not only when to cross the road, but also determine where and in which direction to cross. Accessible pedestrian signals, such as an audible message accompanied by flashing crosswalk lights or signage, can be useful in alerting drivers that a pedestrian is crossing and increase safety for the visually impaired. Truncated domes (Figure 3-19) or other tactile paving is also needed to alert visually impaired pedestrians of crossing locations.

Figure 3-19. Crosswalk lighting. Figure 3-20. Truncated dome on sidewalk ramp. 41 Roundabout Design Principles
Landscaping
Aside from guiding the direction of traffic, the central island of a roundabout usually does not serve a functional purpose and should not be transversed by motorists, pedestrians or cyclists. The land within the central island is essentially free space that can be enhanced to become an aesthetic feature.

Enhancing the visual impact of a roundabout central island is usually achieved through landscaping.

Landscaping can be as simple or elaborate as is desired. Simple landscaping options include grass or other low maintenance ground cover. More elaborate designs include flowers, ornamental landscaping, and fountains. Regardless of the type of landscaping, it is important that the design does not obstruct driver views.

The central island of a roundabout also creates the opportunity for local governments to express community values and sense of identity. Public art (usually sculptures) can be used to decorate a roundabout and create a sense of place and community engagement. Public art should be inclusive and representative of the community’s character.

Figure 3-21. Roundabout dryscaping in Arizona Figure 3-22. Elaborate roundabout landscaping in Chico, CA Figure 3-23. Example of public art in roundabout central island, Lansing, MI.

Figure 3-24. Example of public art in central island,
Sarasota, FL.
42 4. Proposed Design Concepts
43 44
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
45 Introduction
The Design Concepts discussed in this chapter were developed by 4, Creeks, Inc., TJKM, and Yamabe & Horn Engineering. The roundabout designs proposed in this section integrate the design elements discussed in Section 3 - Roundabout Design Principles while taking into account the existing conditions at each intersection. The proposed designs are intended to accommodate existing and future travel demand and were developed based on traffic count data, where available.

Figure 4-1. Proposed Design Concept Locations
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
46 W. El Monte & Road 56 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the E. El Monte & Road 56 intersection was developed by TJKM. Due to limitations related to Covid-19, traffic counts were not available for this intersection, however it was assumed that a single-lane roundabout would be sufficient to accommodate traffic based on the context and surrounding area.

The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from El Monte and single-lane entries from Road 56. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the El Monte Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Road 56 and to better conform to the existing two-lane roadway. Additionally, separating the right turns from the through movements will improve roundabout operations and prevent future delays.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection. There are no existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities and the intersection is not in an area of significant pedestrian or cyclist travel. It is not anticipated that pedestrian or cyclist use will increase in the future . Therefore, no cyclist or pedestrian facilities are proposed. However, cyclists may use the vehicular travel lanes to move through the intersection if needed.

Figure 4-2. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 56.

W. El Monte
Road 56
Proposed Design Concepts
47 E. El Monte & Road 92 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the E. El Monte & Road 92 intersection was developed by TJKM. The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from El Monte and single-lane entries from Road

92. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the El Monte Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Road

92. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection, it was determined that providing right-turn-only lanes on roadway entries with two travel lanes would better conform with the existing roadway. Additionally, separating the right turns from the heavy through movements will improve roundabout operations and help maintain acceptable operation in the future.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection. Crosswalks and sidewalks are proposed along all legs to accommodate pedestrian travel. The proposed sidewalks on the south-west corner will connect to existing sidewalk on the west side of Road 92, south of the intersection, and on the south side of El Monte, west of the intersection.

Sidewalks proposed on the north-west, north-east, and south-east corners will connect to future sidewalks along E. El Monte and Road 92 as these improvements are developed.

As discussed in Section 2, Class II bicycle facilities are present along the east and west legs of the intersection along El Monte Avenue. Bike ramps are proposed to accommodate cyclists who wish to travel through the intersection as a pedestrian. Sharrows are proposed within the circulatory roadway for cyclists wishing to move through the intersection using the vehicular travel lanes.

Figure 4-3. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 92.

E. El Monte
Road 92
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
48 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue Design Concept
The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue intersection was developed by Yamabe & Horn Engineering. It was determined that a single-lane roundabout and single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection under existing and future conditions. Landscaping is proposed to reduce the travel width from the existing 80’ ROW along Alta Avenue to a single entry and exit lane. This will improve safety at the intersection by reducing traffic speeds.

Splitter islands are proposed on all four legs to slow and direct traffic. The splitter island on the southern leg was broken into three pieces in order to provide access to residences along Alta Avenue. A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection.

Sidewalks and crosswalks are proposed on all legs of the intersection to accommodate pedestrian travel.

It is proposed that the crosswalks bend as they intersect the splitter islands in order to orient pedestrians towards oncoming traffic and improve safety. The proposed sidewalks will connect future sidewalks along Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue as these improvements are developed. Bicycle ramps are proposed on all four legs of the intersection to facilitate bicycle movements from the roadway to the sidewalk.

Figure 4-4. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue Nebraska Ave
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
49 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue Design Concept Introduction The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue intersection was developed by 4-Creeks, Inc.

The design proposes a two-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue.

Drivers are directed to use the outer lane for right turns and the inner lane for through traffic and left turns. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection under existing conditions, traffic volumes are expected to significantly increase upon development of the planned high school on the southwest corner of the intersection. It was determined that a multi-lane roundabout would be best to maintain acceptable operation in the future and prevent traffic delays during peak travel periods.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks. Crosswalks and sidewalks are proposed along all legs to accommodate pedestrian travel. The proposed sidewalks on the south-east corner will connect to existing sidewalk south side of Kamm Avenue, east of the intersection, and on the east side of Alta Avenue, south of the intersection. Sidewalks proposed on the south-west corner of the intersection will connect to planned sidewalk facilities upon the development of the new high school.

Sidewalks on the northeast and northwest corners will connect to future sidewalk facilities as those areas are developed in the future. A s discussed in Section 2, Class II Bicycle lanes are present along the north and south legs of Alta Avenue and east of the intersection along Kamm Avenue. Bike ramps are proposed to accommodate cyclists who wish to travel through the intersection using pedestrian facilities. Alternatively, cyclists can merge with vehicular traffic and use vehicular traffic lanes to move through the intersection.

Figure 4-5. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue Kamm Ave
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
50 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Avenue 400 intersection was developed by TJKM. The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from Alta Avenue and single-lane entries from Avenue 400. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the Alta Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Avenue 400. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection, it was determined that providing right-turn-only lanes at entries from Alta Avenue would better conform to the existing 4-lane roadway. Additionally, it was found that while the rate of right turns is not necessarily high, the northbound and southbound through movement is high and right tun movements are higher than left turns on Alta Avenue. Separating the right turns from the heavy through movement traffic will improve roundabout operations and help to avoid future delays.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection. There are no existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities and the intersection is not in an area of significant pedestrian or cyclist travel. It is not anticipated that pedestrian or cyclist use will increase in the future . Therefore, no cyclist or pedestrian facilities are proposed. However, cyclists may use the vehicular travel lanes to move through the intersection if needed.

Existing culverts are located along the north side of El Monte, east of the intersection, and along the west side of Avenue 400, south of the intersection. It is proposed that the roundabout be constructed slightly west of the existing centerline along Avenue 400 in order to avoid construction in the culvert.

Figure 4-6. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.

Avenue 400
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
Preliminary Landscaping Concept Plan
The proposed roundabouts are intended to act as entrances into the City of Dinuba and would be appropriate locations for decorative landscaping and welcome/monument signage. Landscaping should be similar in style to the landscaping used in the City’s medians and parks and consistent with the City of Dinuba Landscaping and Design Guidelines. It should be noted that the contents of this section are intended to guide the development of a final landscaping plan, and that a final landscaping plan should be prepared by a qualified landscape architect prior to project implementation.

Central Islands
Landscaping is proposed within the central islands of all roundabouts proposed by this study. Central islands should be landscaped with shrubs and ornamental vegetation that allow adequate sight distance for vehicles and pedestrians. Sculptures, or other public artwork, may be incorporated into the design to enhance the visual character. Plants should be selected based on their ability to provide a variety of colors and textures and spaced to fill in 80% of the central island area within two years after planting.

Groundcover coverage should be 100% in one year. A sample plant list for central island landscaping is provided below.
• Yeddo Hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis umbellata)
• Chinese Red Fringe Flower
• Privet (Ligustrum japonicum)
• Dianella (Cassa Blue or Clarity Blue)
• Fortnight Lily (Butterfly Iris)
• Asian Star Jasmine
• Lantana
• Red & Yellow Yucca
• “Flamingo Glow” Yucca/Lily (Beschorneria yuccoides)
• Agave “Blue Glow”
Welcome signs or monument signs are an effective tool to create a sense of identity in a public space, and can be incorporated into the roundabout central island landscaping plan to inform drivers of where they are and provide aesthetic benefits. “Welcome to Dinuba” monument signage is proposed at the intersections of W. El Monte & Road 56, W. El Monte & Road 92, N. Alta & Nebraska, and S. Alta & Kamm Avenue. Monument signage may be implemented at S. Alta & Avenue 400 instead of S. Alta & Kamm Avenue at the City’s discretion.

Planter Strips and Splitter Islands
Landscaping is proposed within all splitter islands wider than 8 feet and within planter strips, where applicable. Plants should be selected based on their ability to provide low maintenance, drought tolerant ground cover and should be spaced to provide 100% ground cover in 1 year. Sod should not be used within planter strips or splitter islands. Decorative hardscaping is proposed where splitter islands are less than 8 feet wide.
51 Proposed Design Concepts
Figure 4-7. Conceptual central island landscaping and monument signage.

Figure 4-8. Conceptual splitter island landscaping.
52 5. Action Plan and Implementation
53 54
Action Plan and Implementation
Introduction
55 Feasibility Study Implementation
This planning study was developed to assess the feasibility of roundabout intersections at five key locations that serve as access points to the City of Dinuba. It is intended to serve as a planning-level study to guide the development of roundabout designs at these intersections. Implementation of the Study is based on the following assumptions:
• All improvements will be consistent with the City of Dinuba General Plan, as well as all other applicable agency standards.
• Implementation of the proposed design concepts identified in this feasibility study will occur as funding sources become available. This may be in phases depending on the funding source and timing availability.
• Project funding is able to be obtained locally or through State and Federal funding sources. • Land necessary to accommodate the footprint of the proposed roundabout can be reasonably obtained through Right of Way Acquisitions.

Based on these assumptions, all five intersections involved in this study are considered to be feasible locations for roundabout intersections, and the designs provided in Section 4 - Proposed Design Concepts are appropriate to accommodate existing and future uses. This section will strategies necessary to achieve project implementation, including Right-of-Way acquisition, environmental review and compliance, and financial planning.

Action Plan and Implementation
Right of Way Acquisition
Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition is the act of acquiring land or easements to complete a project. ROW acquisitions will be required for four of the intersections prior to project implementation. The roundabout at El Monte & Road 56 is the only intersection that will not require ROW acquisition because existing ROW is sufficient to accommodate the proposed design. Land that will need to be acquired by the City prior to project implementation is shown in Figures 5-1 - Figure 5-4, and a summary of ROW acquisition requirements is provided in Table 7. It should be noted that ROW area calculations are approximate and based off of conceptual designs. Property boundary surveys and final designs will be needed to determine exact ROW acquisition requirements.
56 Figure 5-1. El Monte & Road 92 ROW Acquisition Figure 5-2. Alta & Nebraska Ave ROW Acquisition Figure 5-3. Alta & Kamm ROW Acquisition Figure 5-4. Alta & Ave 400 ROW Acquisition Action Plan and Implementation
Table 7. ROW Acquisition Summary
Intersection APN Land Use
ROW
Acquisition
(sf)
E. El Monte & Road 92 013-090-040 General Commercial 3925 013-090-055 Medium-Low Density Residential 4444
018-180-020 Medium-Low Density Residential 6701
018-180-032, 034 General Commercial 3296
N. Alta & Nebraska
Avenue
013-050-012 Medium-Low Density Residential 7937
013-100-008 Community Commercial 11481
014-071-001 Medium-Low Density Residential 6528
014-380-023 Community Commercial 14450
S. Alta & Kamm Avenue 107-172-009, 059 Light Industrial 9754 017-210-020 Community Commercial 3442
030-010-041 Light Industrial 3761
030-260-043 General Commercial 5778
S. Alta & Avenue 400 030-020-039 Professional Office 975 030-030-020 Industrial Reserve 412
57 Environmental Review and Compliance Process
It is likely that all five proposed roundabouts will require federal funding and will therefore be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The federal agency that is providing project funding will be responsible for complying with the requirements of NEPA, while the City of Dinuba and/or Tulare County will act as Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA guidelines.

It is anticipated that the environmental impacts associated with Plan implementation will be adequately accounted for under a Finding of No Significant Impact under NEPA and a Negative Declaration under CEQA, however the final determination regarding the appropriate environmental compliance documents will be made by the federal agency carrying out the federal action and the City of Dinuba and/or Tulare County as Lead Agencies pursuant to NEPA and CEQA guidelines.

Environmental
Assessment
(EA) Notice of
Availability and
Final EIS
Finding of No
Significant Impact
(FONSI)
Draft
Environemtnal
Impact Statement
(EIS)
Record of Decision
(ROD)
Notice of
Intent (NOI)
Figure 5-5. NEPA Process
Action Plan and Implementation
Initial
Environmental
Study
Negative
Declaration /
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(ND/MND)
Final EIR
Decision
Notice of
Preparation
(NOP)
Draft EIR
Figure 5-6. CEQA Process
Table 8. Cost Estimate Summary
Intersection Total Construction Cost
W. El Monte & Road 56 $2,111,039.98
E. El Monte & Road 92 $3,512,965.78
N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue $2,942,000.00
S. Alta & Kamm Avenue $2,625,651.88
S. Alta & Avenue 400 $2,135,507.28
Financial Plan
Because implementation of the proposed design concepts is completely dependent on the acquisition of adequate funding, cost estimates and identification of potential funding sources is necessary to ensure the practicality of this study. This section will discuss the estimated costs of proposed design concepts and identify potential funding sources to support project implementation.

Project Costs
Preliminary cost estimates for implementation of four of the proposed design concepts were developed by 4-Creeks. Cost estimates for the N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue roundabout were developed by Yamabe & Horn Engineering. These estimates should be used as a guideline for funding requests and scheduling.

It should be noted that cost estimates are based off of preliminary designs and assumed project extents (i.e. length of road reconstruction) and cost estimates may need to be updated throughout the design and approval process as more information becomes available. 58 Action Plan and Implementation
59 Table 9. El Monte & Road 56 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 258 SF $1.50 $387.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 157,197 SF $0.25 $39,299.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 605 LF $4.00 $2,420.00 10 Remove Asphalt Dike 133 LF $4.00 $532.00
11 Remove Guard Rail 189 LF $6.00 $1,134.00
12 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 8 EA $7,000.00 $56,000.00 13 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 14 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
15 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,659 LF $42.00 $153,678.00
17 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,342 LF $40.00 $53,680.00 18 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
19 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
20 Landscaping 9,533 SF $4.00 $38,132.00
21 Stamped Median Concrete 1,209 SF $15.00 $18,135.00
22 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
4,222 SF $25.00 $105,550.00
23 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 24 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
25 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
26 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,553 TON $100.00 $455,300.00
27 Class II Aggregate Base 6,937 TON $80.00 $554,960.00 Construction Subtotal $1,919,127.25
Contingency (10%) $191,912.73
Construction Total $2,111,039.98
Action Plan and Implementation
Introduction
60 Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message
Signs (PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 4,524 SF $1.50 $6,786.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 119,305 SF $0.25 $29,826.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 1,105 LF $4.00 $4,420.00 10 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 1 EA $7,000.00 $7,000.00 11 Power Pole Relocation 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000.00
12 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 13 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
14 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
15 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,007 LF $42.00 $126,294.00
16 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,922 LF $40.00 $76,880.00 17 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
18 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
19 Landscaping 18,031 SF $4.00 $72,124.00
20 Concrete Sidewalks 16,905 SF $6.00 $101,430.00
21 Stamped Median Concrete 1,382 SF $15.00 $20,730.00
22 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
3,607 SF $25.00 $90,175.00
23 Curb Ramp 8 EA $5,500.00 $44,000.00
24 Detecable Warning Surfaces 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00
25 Bike Ramp 4 EA $3,700.00 $14,800.00
26 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 27 RFB Beacons 1 LS $220,000.00 $220,000.00
28 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
29 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
30 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,944 TON $100.00 $494,400.00
Action Plan and Implementation
Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate Continued
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
31 Class II Aggregate Base 7,446 TON $80.00 $595,680.00 32 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 18,366 SF $40.00 $734,640.00 Construction Subtotal $3,193,605.25
Contingency (10%) $319,360.53
Construction Total $3,512,965.78
Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Traffic and Dust Control 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000.00
3 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000.00
4 Asphalt Concrete Grinding 82,392 SF $0.25 $20,598.00
5 Roadway Excavation 3,560 CY $40.00 $142,400.00
6 Hot Mix Asphalt, Type 'A' 2,401 TON $120.00 $288,120.00 7 Aggregate Base, CL II 4,332 TON $35.00 $151,620.00
8 Construct Concrete Median Curb 1,701 LF $30.00 $51,030.00 9 Construct Mountable Curb 364 LF $35.00 $12,740.00
10 Construct Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,111 LF $40.00 $124,440.00 11 Construct Concrete Sidewalk 18,460 SF $7.00 $129,220.00 12 Construct Concrete Stamped Truck
Apron
4,305 SF $30.00 $129,150.00
13 Construct Concrete Residential
Driveway Approach
3,447 SF $15.00 $51,705.00
14 Construct Concrete Commercial
Driveway Approach
2,008 SF $25.00 $50,200.00
15 Construct 3" Thick Brick Stamped
Concrete
1,482 SF $8.00 $11,856.00
16 Construct Concrete Curb Ramp 8 EA $3,000.00 $24,000.00 17 Construct Concrete Bicycle Ramp 8 EA $2,000.00 $16,000.00 18 Construct Concrete Pedestrian Refuge 4 EA $8,000.00 $32,000.00 19 Adjust Existing Water Valve 7 EA $800.00 $5,600.00
20 Adjust Existing Water Meter 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 21 Relocate Existing Water Meter 3 EA $1,000.00 $3,000.00 61 Action Plan and Implementation
Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate Continued No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
22 Install 1" Water Service 14 EA $3,500.00 $49,000.00
23 Install 2" Water Service 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500.00
24 Install Backflow Preventor 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00
25 Relocate Fire Hydrant 2 EA $4,500.00 $9,000.00
26 Adjust Existing Sanitary Sewer
Manhole
3 EA $1,200.00 $3,600.00
27 Install Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 EA $6,000.00 $24,000.00 28 Install 10" Trunk Sanitary Sewer Pipe 600 LF $130.00 $78,000.00 29 Install 15" Trunk Sanitary Sewer Pipe 400 LF $135.00 $54,000.00 30 Install 4" Sanitary Sewer Service 7 EA $2,500.00 $17,500.00 31 Install 6" Sanitary Sewer Service 2 EA $2,500.00 $5,000.00 32 Construct Storm Drain Inlet 5 EA $5,000.00 $25,000.00 33 Construct 48" Storm Drain Manhole 7 EA $6,000.00 $42,000.00 34 Install 24" Storm Drain Pipe 246 LF $160.00 $39,360.00 35 Install 48" Storm Drain Pipe 1,318 LF $180.00 $237,240.00 36 Install Underground Retention Basin 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 37 Install Landscape and Irrigation Plan 34,596 SF $8.00 $276,768.00 38 Install Streetlight Pull Box 3 EA $1,300.00 $3,900.00 39 Install Directional Bore, Conduit, and
Conductors
2,476 LF $22.50 $55,710.00
40 P.O.S. and Power Connection 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00 41 Install Streetlight 20 EA $8,000.00 $160,000.00
42 Relocate Chain Link Fence 220 LF $10.00 $2,200.00
43 Construct City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00 44 Worker Protection From Caving
Ground in Excavation
1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00
45 SWPP Development & Maintenance 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 46 Install Pavement Striping and Signage
and Markings
1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00
47 Acquire City Encroachment Permit 1 LS $117,000.00 $117,000.00 48 Miscellaneous Street Facilities and
Operations
1 LS $20,543.00 $20,543.00
Construction Subtotal $2,942,000.00
Introduction
62 Action Plan and Implementation
63 Table 12. S Alta & Kamm Avenue Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
Base Bid
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS 75,000.00 $75,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000.00
3 Dust Control 1 LS 3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS 35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS 4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA 1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 1,528 SF 1.50 $2,292.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 62,241 SF 0.25 $15,560.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 1,169 LF 4.00 $4,676.00 10 Remove Asphalt Dike 231 LF 4.00 $924.00
11 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00
12 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,496 LF 42.00 $62,832.00
13 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,385 LF 40.00 $55,400.00 14 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
415 LF 60.00 $24,900.00
15 Retaining Curb 315 LF 30.00 $9,450.00
16 Concrete Sidewalks 14,942 SF 6.00 $89,652.00
17 Stamped Median Concrete 5,552 SF 15.00 $83,280.00
18 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
5,014 SF 25.00 $125,350.00
19 Curb Ramp 8 EA 5,500 $44,000.00
20 Detecable Warning Surfaces 1 LS 4,500 $4,500.00
21 Bike Ramp 8 EA 3,700 $29,600.00
22 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS 45,000.00 $45,000.00 23 Hot Mix Asphalt 2,003 TON 100.00 $200,300.00
24 Class II Aggregate Base 6,583 TON 80.00 $526,640.00
25 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 22,735 SF 40.00 $909,400.00 Construction Subtotal $2,386,956.25
Contingency (10%) $238,695.63
Construction Total $2,625,651.88
Action Plan and Implementation
Table 13. S Alta & Avenue 400 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 91,865 SF $0.25 $22,966.25 8 Remove Asphalt Dike 289 LF $4.00 $1,156.00
9 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 8 EA $7,000.00 $56,000.00 10 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 11 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
12 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
13 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,656 LF $42.00 $153,552.00
14 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,235 LF $40.00 $49,400.00 15 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
16 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
17 Landscaping 7,379 SF $4.00 $29,516.00
18 Stamped Median Concrete 731 SF $15.00 $10,965.00
19 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
4,223 SF $25.00 $105,575.00
20 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 21 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
22 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
23 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,610 TON $100.00 $461,000.00
24 Class II Aggregate Base 6,948 TON $80.00 $555,840.00 25 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 1,387 SF $40.00 $55,480.00 Construction Subtotal $1,941,370.25
Contingency (10%) $194,137.03
Construction Total $2,135,507.28
64 Action Plan and Implementation
Potential Funding Sources
Successful implementation of the design concepts proposed by this Feasibility Study will require acquisition of reliable funding. Funding for design concept implementation may be obtained locally or through State and Federal Grant programs. Although local funding sources are often more reliable, State and Federal grants should be pursued to supplement project implementation.

The number and type of grant and loan programs available to public agencies in any given year can vary significantly based on Legislature appropriations. Many of the grant programs below are on-going with rounds of grant monies provided upon availability of funding. The grant and loan programs listed below are not exhaustive and should be updated regularly upon implementation of any design concepts proposed by this feasibility. The City of Dinuba will be responsible for developing individual applications in response to grant program solicitations.

Federal Funding Sources
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program: The CMAQ program provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs that help to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. The program funds projects that reduce congestion and improve air quality for aras that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas) and for former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance maintenance areas). This program is funded through the FAST act.
• Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act: A fairly flexible program to provide federal funding to state and regional governments for transportation related projects and programs. The AID Demonstration program, Safe Routes to School program, Transportation Enhancements Program, and Transportation Alternatives Program grants are also provided under the FAST Act. • Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) program: The BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program, previously known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program, provides fundings funding for selected projects and programs based on considerations for safety, economic competitiveness, quality of life, environmental sustainability, state of good repair, innovation, and partnershop. The Department of Transportation (DOT) website states that the DOT intends to award 50% of BUILD transportation grant funding to projects located in rural areas to deliver positive benefits to these communities. • Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) discretionary grant program: Provides funding to State and regional governments for public infrastructure projects. • Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program (TCSP): TCSP is intended to address the relationships among transportation, community, and system preservation plans and practices and identify private sector-based initiatives to improve those relationships. State and local governments, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), and tribal governments are eligible for discretionary grants, authorized at $270 million through 2009, to carry out eligible projects to integrate transportation, community, and system preservation plans and practices. 65 Action Plan and Implementation
State Funding Sources
• Low Carbon Transportation Investments and Air Quality Improbement Program: The Low Carbon Transportation Investments and the Air Quality Improvement Program is funded through Capand-Trade auction proceeds and provides funding for projects that reduce transportation-related emissions.
• California Department of Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program:

Provides funding for projects related to housing, public works, and community facilities for low-income areas.
• Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1): Provides increased funding to fix roads, freeways, and bridges in communities across California with funds split equally between State and Local Investments. • Transportation Development Act (TDA): the TDA provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transporation plans. The act establishes two funding sources; the Local Transporation Fund (LTF), and the State Transit Assistance (STA) fund. LTF may be usd by counties with a population under 500,000 for local streets and roads, construction, and maintenance. STA funding can only be used for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes.
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD): Provides funding for a variety of local transportation related projects that support the goals of the SJVAPCD. These include funds for bike paths, electric vehicle charging stations, and public transportation subsidies. 66 Action Plan and Implementation
Project Prioritization
It is unlikely that funding will be available to implement all five intersections simultaneously. Therefore, it is important to prioritize projects that will provide the greatest community benefit first. Flexibility should be given with regard to priority order, as projects may need to be implemented out of sequence based on funding availability and readiness to proceed.

There are a number of ways projects may be prioritized. The City of Dinuba may choose to prioritize projects based on collision rates for each intersection. Because roundabouts greatly reduce the chance of injury or fatality in the event of a collision, this method of project prioritization would be the most beneficial to public safety. Using the collision history discussed in Section 3, this method would prioritize the proposed roundabout projects in the following order:

1. Alta Avenue & Road 56

2. Alta Avenue & Avenue 400

3. El Monte & Road 92

4. Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue

5. Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue
Roundabout intersections also offer substantial benefits related to traffic flow. Because traffic delay has a direct effect on greenhouse gas emissions and air quality, the City of Dinuba may choose to prioritize projects based on traffic volumes to maximize emissions reduction benefits. The proposed projects would be prioritized in the order below using this method. The Alta/Avenue 56 intersection is not included in this prioritization list because traffic counts were not available at the time of this study due to COVID-19.

1. Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue

2. Alta Avenue & Avenue 400

3. Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue

4. El Monte & Road 92
The City may wish to consider other factors as they determine the most appropriate way to prioritize the proposed projects. Potential considerations include pedestrian volume, future development (such as the planned high school at Alta & Kamm) or community input. The City of Dinuba has the option to select a method of prioritization at the acceptance of this plan or at a later date. 67 City Council Staff Report
Department: FIRE SERVICES October 25, 2022
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jordan Webster, Fire Chief
Subject: Acceptance of $2.0 Million Earmark from California Governor's Office of Emergency Services for the Purchase of a New Fire Ladder Truck (JORW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Pass Through Grant Subaward in the amount of $2,000,000.00 for the purchase of new fire apparatus and fire apparatus equipment and authorize the City Manager or designee to sign any related documents.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Dinuba requested a $2.0 million state earmark through Senator Melissa Hurtado's office for the purchase of a new 105'-foot aerial fire ladder truck and associated equipment. The Senator was successful in securing these funds as part of the state's fiscal year 2022-23 budget. The city has received the subaward documents from the Governor's Office of Emergency Services and is requesting that the City Council accept the funds and authorize staff to execute related documents.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The California Budget Act of 2022 included state appropriations to support State Government for fiscal year 2022/2023. On September 1, 2022, Assembly Bill 179 was passed. In the 2022 State Budget, Senator Hurtado secured $465.75 million dollars to support investments in public safety, water, education and food programs. The Central Valley received a record $56 million for public safety, the largest amount ever secured for much needed updates to fire personnel safety equipment, new fire and police stations across the district.

One of the State earmarks that Senator Hurtado was able to secure was $2.0 million to the City of Dinuba for the purchase of a new 105' aerial ladder truck for the Dinuba Fire Department. This new fire apparatus will replace the department's current aerial fire truck that is nearly 20 years old. Having modern and reliable equipment is critical to the safety of our citizens and the safety of our firefighters.

In recognition of this award, staff has prepared a letter for the City Council's signature thanking Senator Melissa Hurtado for championing funding for public safety. A copy of the letter is enclosed as Attachment 'A'.

Upon acceptance of the state funds, Chief Jordan Webster will formally order the new aerial ladder truck, which has an 18-month lead-time.

FISCAL IMPACT
The $2,000,000.00 in state funding will allow the city to maximize cost savings by creating the ability for the city to prepay for the fire apparatus, which creates a purchase discount of $45,000.00.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. Senator Hurtado Thank You Letter

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
405 E. El Monte Avenue
Dinuba, CA 93618
B: (559) 590-5900
F: (559) 591-4246
[email protected]
October 25, 2022
Capitol Office
1021 O Street, Room 7310
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: $2.0 Million State Earmark – Fire Ladder Truck
Honorable Senator Hurtado,
On behalf of the Dinuba City Council and its citizens, we would to thank you and your staff for championing the $2.0 million state earmark for our new aerial fire ladder truck.

This funding allows us to purchase a new fire apparatus that will replace the Fire Department's current aerial fire truck that is nearly 20 years old. Having modern and reliable equipment is critical to the safety of our citizens and the safety of our firefighters.

Again, we appreciate and recognize your commitment to public safety, City of Dinuba and the Valley.

Respectfully,
Linda Launer
Mayor
District 5
Maribel Reynosa
Vice Mayor
District 2
Kuldip Thusu
Councilmember
District 4
Armando Longoria
Councilmember
District 3
Rachel Nerio-Guerrero
Councilmember
District 1

← All documents from this meeting