Agenda — Dinuba City Council, July 9, 2024

Tuesday, July 9, 2024 / 6:30 PM / City Hall / 405 East El Monte Way, Dinuba District 1
Rachel NerioGuerrero
Vice Mayor
District 2
Maribel Reynosa
Mayor
District 3
Benjamin Prado
Council Member
District 4
Kuldip Thusu
Council Member
District 5
Linda Launer
Council Member
All attendees are advised that electronic devices should be placed on silent upon entering the Council Chambers.

The City Council will take action on all items listed on the agenda.

1. OPENING CEREMONIES

1.1. Welcome and Call to Order

1.2. Invocation

1.3. Pledge of Allegiance

2. PRESENTATIONS/CEREMONIAL MATTERS

2.1. Year-End Presentation by Airica de Oliviera, Executive Director Tulare County Economic Development Commission

3. AGENDA CHANGES OR DELETIONS
To better accommodate members of the public or convenience in the order of presentation, items on the agenda may not be presented or acted upon in the order listed. Additions to Agenda may be added only pursuant to California Government Code section 54954.2(b).

4. REQUEST TO ADDRESS COUNCIL
This portion of the meeting is reserved for any person who would like to address the Council on any item that is not on the agenda. Please be advised that State law does not allow the City Council to discuss or take any action on any issue not on the agenda. The City Council may direct staff to follow up on such item(s). Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. If there is any person wishing to address the City Council at this time please approach the podium and state your name and nature of the request.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.

5.1. SUBJECT
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (MA)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the City Council meeting of June 25, 2024 as presented.
a

5.2. SUBJECT
Authorization to Execute an Agreement Between the City of Dinuba and West Hills College (GC)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to authorize the Fire Chief to execute an agreement between the City of Dinuba and West Hills College to provide emergency medical technician (EMT) and paramedic field training.
a

5.3. SUBJECT
Resolution No. 2024-55 Approving Adjustments to the 2023/24 Budget (KS)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council Adopt Resolution No. 2024-55 approving budget amendments for the Fiscal Year End 2023/24.
a

6. WARRANT REGISTER

6.1. SUBJECT
Warrant Register June 28 & July 5, 2024 (KS)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented. a

7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

7.1. SUBJECT
Future Roundabout Project Discussion (JW)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council receive presentation on roundabouts eligible for grant funding and provide direction on prioritization.
a

7.2. SUBJECT
Resolution No. 2024-52 Authorizing Execution of Program Supplement for the use of Measure R funds for the El Monte Way Corridor Improvements Project Phase 2 (GA)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to adopt Resolution No. 2024-52 approving a Program Supplement for the use of Measure R funds in the amount of $700,000 for design and ROW acquisition for Phase 2 of the El Monte Way Corridor Improvements Project and authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the required documents. a

7.3. SUBJECT
2023-24 Year-in-Review (LP)
a

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept the 2023-24 Year-in-Review as an informational item. a

8. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORTS

9. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS

10. CITY STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

11. CLOSED SESSION

11.1. Conference with Labor Negotiators (MA)
Pursuant to GC Subdivision 54957.6; Agency designated representative: Maria Alaniz; Karina Solis; Luis Patlan; Daniel James
Employee Organizations: City Employees' Association; Police Officers' Association; Firefighters' Association; and Unrepresented Employees

11.2. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (LP)
Pursuant to GC Section 54957; Title: City Manager
The City Council will conduct the City Manager's annual performance evaluation.

12. ADJOURNMENT
This agenda was posted at least 72 hours prior to the regular meeting per GC Section 54954.2(a). A Citizens' Packet regarding this meeting is available at the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, 405 East El Monte Way, Dinuba CA 93618.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if special assistance is needed to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 559-591-5900. Please provide at least 48 hours notification prior to the meeting to allow staff to make reasonable arrangements. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
559.591.5900 / FAX 559.591.5902 . e-mail address: [email protected]. www.dinuba.org City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Luis Patlan, City Manager
Subject:

Year-End Presentation by Airica de Oliviera, Executive Director Tulare County Economic Development Commission

RECOMMENDATION
Council to receive year-end report from Airica de Oliveira, Executive Director of the Tulare County Economic Development Commission.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUTSTANDING ISSUES

DISCUSSION

FISCAL IMPACT

PUBLIC HEARING
City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY CLERK July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director By: Lupe Montejano, Billing and Collections Supervisor
Subject: Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes (MA)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the City Council meeting of June 25, 2024 as presented.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
None.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
City Council Meeting Minutes, June 25, 2024

City Council Staff Report
Department: FIRE SERVICES July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Greg Chastain, Fire Chief
Subject:

Authorization to Execute an Agreement Between the City of Dinuba and West Hills College (GC)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Dinuba Fire Department proposes to renew an agreement with West Hills College to provide EMT and paramedic students with field training opportunities required to attain their EMT or paramedic license.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
The State of California requires paramedic students to perform 480 hours of field internship while being trained and supervised by a licensed paramedic. The Dinuba Fire Department has previously trained interns from Fresno City College, the County of Fresno, National University, and West Hills College.

The EMT and paramedic field internship programs allow fire department staff to observe potential candidates for employment and gives the students a chance to see what it is like to be employed at Dinuba Fire Department. This agreement may also allow Dinuba Fire Department employees to complete their field internships in Dinuba if they attend a West Hills College program.

The City Council is asked to approve the agreement and allow the Fire Chief to sign the associated documents. The agreement is included herein as Attachment 'A'.

FISCAL IMPACT
Paramedic preceptors receive a 3% pay increase for the duration of the internship.

The average cost per paramedic intern is $460. EMT students require 24 hours of field internship. The average cost per EMT intern is $25.

PUBLIC HEARING
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Attachment 'A'

Page 1 of 8 ends

AGREEMENT
Allied Health Programs
Paramedic/EMT Student Field Training Agreement
This is an agreement between WEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT") and City of Dinuba (hereinafter referred to as "FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER") and is effective as of August 1, 2024.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS the DISTRICT provides in its curriculum programs for the education of paramedic students in accordance with Local, State, and Federal laws, regulations, and guidance; and WHEREAS the above FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER is willing, under mutually agreed conditions, to allow the DISTRICT to utilize the personnel, equipment, and patient care environment of such FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER for the clinical training of paramedic students enrolled in the Paramedic Programs and EMT students of The DISTRICT; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF DISTRICT
a. The DISTRICT shall provide:
i. Paramedic/EMT students for field training to the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER;
ii. Test and select all such Paramedic/EMT students;
iii. Provide didactic instructors(s) hired by the DISTRICT; and Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 2 of 8 ends

iv. Provide guidance required in the program unless in specific instances other provisions are made and are mutually satisfactory to the DISTRICT and the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER. Paramedic preceptors
supervising the clinical training shall be mutually acceptable to the parties.

2. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER
a. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER:
i. Agrees to provide a supervised field training program to the selected paramedic/EMT students in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in this agreement and as dictated by local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and guidance;
ii. Will provide paramedic preceptors supervising each paramedic student’s field training, which shall be mutually acceptable to both parties; iii. Provide locker facilities and dressing rooms for paramedic/EMT students and DISTRICT employees, only if available;
iv. Make available to the paramedic student and DISTRICT employee’s use of medical library for reference material, only if available; v. Allow use of such reference library manuals, and other reference materials by the paramedic/EMT student and DISTRICT employees, only if available;
vi. Allow use of supplies and equipment, charts, procedure manuals, policy manuals, and other reference materials, as approved by FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER;
vii. Retains professional and administrative responsibility for any services rendered by paramedic/EMT students;
viii. Allow use of parking for paramedic/EMT students and DISTRICT employees, only if available;
ix. Allow use of cafeteria and/or kitchen by paramedic/EMT students and DISTRICT employees when applicable;
x. Shall provide first-aid treatment to paramedic/EMT students needing such care, but shall not be obligated to furnish any other medical or surgical service to any paramedic student. Any paramedic/EMT student returning from an absence after 3 or more days caused by any illness or injury shall be cleared by a physician or the private physician of the student prior to returning to the field training;
xi. Shall not decrease the normal number of its staff as a result of the assignment of paramedic students

3. The period of time for each paramedic student’s field training at FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER shall be mutually agreed upon between FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER and THE DISTRICT prior to the beginning of each paramedic student's field training. If Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 3 of 8 ends

a particular paramedic student requires additional training, the parties may agree to reasonable extensions.

4. The number of paramedic/EMT students to participate in the field training with the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER at any given time shall be mutually agreed upon by the DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER prior to the beginning of the field training. This may be modified from time to time by mutual agreement upon the request of either party.

5. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER may require the DISTRICT to withdraw any paramedic or EMT student from FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER's field training program who FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER determines, in its sole discretion, is not performing satisfactorily, or who refuses to follow FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER's administrative and patient care policies, procedures, rules and regulations.

6. The DISTRICT shall notify the paramedic/EMT student, prior to field training, their responsibilities for:
a. Following the administrative and patient care policies, procedures, rules and regulations of FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER;
b. Acquiring and using the necessary and appropriate uniforms and personal protective equipment when not provided by FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER; c. Arranging for their own transportation and personal living accommodations and costs when not provided by FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER; and d. Adhering to program requirements concerning obtaining the necessary health screening. The DISTRICT will provide this information to the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER.

7. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER shall maintain in its normal course of business complete attendance and progress records and reports on each paramedic/EMT student's performance and shall provide an evaluation for each paramedic/EMT student to the DISTRICT on forms, electronic and hard copy, provided by the DISTRICT.

8. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER shall, upon reasonable request, and on dates and times that are mutually agreeable, permit the DISTRICT and/or appropriate agencies charged with the responsibility of accrediting or approving the paramedic/EMT program to inspect the field facilities, services available for field training, paramedic/EMT student records, and such other materials, which pertain to the field training.

9. It is expressly agreed and understood by the DISTRICT and the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER that the paramedic/EMT students under this program are in attendance for the paramedic/EMT program at the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER’s location(s) and solely for educational purposes.

Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 4 of 8 ends

10. It is agreed and understood that the parties to this agreement are independent contractors, and that neither is the employee or employer of the other and that the employees of one are not the employees of the other.

11. INSURANCE.

The DISTRICT agrees to maintain in full force and effect coverage of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per incident and five million dollars ($5,000,000) aggregate coverage for bodily injury and general liability insurance, including errors and omissions coverage, which protects and insures against any and all liability attributable to the DISTRICT or its employees arising from the activities referred to in this Agreement or as contemplated by this Agreement. Proof of DISTRICT’s insurance coverage shall be provided to the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER. The DISTRICT or DISTRICT’s insurer shall provide written notice to FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER at least twenty (20) days prior to any cancellation, termination, or change in the insurance coverage referenced in this agreement. In the event that the DISTRICT fails to maintain such insurance coverage in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement, FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER may either (1) terminate this agreement concurrently with such failure by DISTRICT, or (2) obtain such insurance on its own behalf. If FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER obtains such insurance, the DISTRICT shall reimburse the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER for the costs thereof.

The DISTRICT agrees to require each paramedic student, as a condition of participation in the paramedic program, to maintain individual student professional liability insurance coverage which includes coverage of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per incident and three million dollars ($3,000,000) in the aggregate for professional liability protection on covered claims arising from real or alleged negligence. The paramedic student or the paramedic student’s insurer shall provide written notice to the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER at least twenty (20) days prior to any cancellation, termination, or change in the insurance coverage referenced in this agreement.

The DISTRICT agrees to provide proof of Worker’s Compensation coverage for DISTRICT employees and paramedic students for injury during clinical training.

The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER agrees to maintain in full force and effect coverage of not less than one million ($1,000,000) per incident and five million dollars ($5,000,000) aggregate coverage for bodily injury and general liability insurance, including errors and omissions coverage, which protect and insures against any and all liability attributable to FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER or its employees arising from the activities referred to in this Agreement or as contemplated by this agreement. Proof of FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER’s insurance coverage shall be provided to the DISTRICT. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER or FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER’s insurer shall provide written notice to the DISTRICT at least twenty (20) days prior to cancellation, termination, or change in the insurance coverage referenced by this Agreement. In the event that the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER fails to maintain such Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 5 of 8 ends

coverage in full force and effect during the term of this agreement, the DISTRICT may either (1) terminate this Agreement concurrently with such failure by the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER, or (2) obtain such insurance on its own behalf. If DISTRICT obtains such insurance, FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER shall reimburse DISTRICT for the costs thereof.

12. In lieu of and notwithstanding the pro rata risk allocation which might otherwise be imposed between the Parties pursuant to Government Code Section 895.6, the Parties agree that all losses or liabilities incurred by a party shall not be shared pro rata but instead the DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER agree that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each of the parties hereto shall fully indemnify and hold each of the other parties, their officers, board members, employees, and agents, harmless from any claim, expense or cost, damage or liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party, its officers, employees, or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to such party under this Agreement. No party, nor any officer, board member, employee, or agent thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the other parties hereto their officers, board members, employees or agents, under or in connection with or arising out of any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to such other parties under this Agreement.

13. All notices, demands, or other writings in the AGREEMENT provided to be given or made or sent, or which may be given or made or sent, by either party hereto to the other, shall be deemed to have been fully given or made or sent when made in writing and deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

To FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER:

Greg Chastain
Fire Chief
City of Dinuba
496 E. Tulare St
Dinuba, CA 93618
(559) 591-5931
Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 6 of 8 ends

To the DISTRICT:

Kristin Clark
Chancellor

WEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE

DISTRICT
275 Phelps Ave
Coalinga, CA 93210
(559) 934-2000

14. The waiver by either party of a breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of any subsequent or other breach hereof.

15. Each Paramedic/EMT student shall be subject to related Local, State, and Federal codes, the rules, regulations, policies and procedures of the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER and the DISTRICT which are on file in the respective institutions and available to students.

This will include the attendance by every student to a mandatory orientation meeting and to read and sign a HIPPA Compliance Agreement. The FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER will provide this meeting and the Agreement.

16. The DISTRICT may, for cause and upon notice, discontinue the assignment of any student(s) at any time during the period of this Agreement.

17. Paramedic/EMT students shall function under the direction and supervision of assigned paramedic instructor(s) of the DISTRICT who shall be licensees for the limited purposes expressed in this Agreement. Such students and instructors shall not be deemed employees of the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER during the hours in which they are assigned to the Paramedic/EMT student.

18. No person shall, on the grounds of sex, race, color, nation origin or handicap, be excluded participation in, be denied benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any DISTRICT program or service, including those programs expressed in this Agreement.

19. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the DISTRICT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER, its council members, officers and employees, patients, or clients, against any and all claims, liabilities and losses, by whoever asserted, arising out of acts or omissions on the part of the DISTRICT or its employees and Paramedic/EMT students in conducting the Paramedic/EMT program hereunder, including travel to and from the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER. And, the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER will indemnify and hold harmless DISTRICT, its officers and employees against any and all claims, liabilities and losses, by whomever asserted, arising out of acts or omissions on the part of FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 7 of 8 ends

its council members, officers and employees, patients or clients in conducting the Paramedic/EMT program hereunder.

20. The provision of this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors in interest of the parties.

21. The DISTRICT's Paramedic/EMT Program Course Director, and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER administrative representative may mutually agree upon, and may formalize by a separate writing, the operational details and per student cost of the field training program, and such separate agreement and writing will be binding on both the DISTRICT and the FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER in the same manner as if they had been part of this agreement.

22. Any controversy, claim or dispute, whether based on contract, tort or statute under either California or federal law, arising out of or relating to this Agreement any alleged breach of it shall be determined and settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and a judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The arbitration will be conducted in San Diego, California. The prevailing party in the arbitration proceeding will be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs expended or incurred relating to or arising out of the arbitration matter.

23. This agreement may be modified or amended without additional consideration at any time by mutual written consent of the parties.

24. Period of agreement. This agreement shall be effective for three years from August 1, 2024, to July 31, 2027; with an automatic renewal until July 31, 2029, unless either party provides written notice that the Agreement will not be extended. The written notice must be received 30 days prior to the end of the current term for which classes are in session.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement in duplicate by their duly authorized representatives.

Paramedic Student Field Training Agreement
Between The DISTRICT and FIELD TRAINING PROVIDER

Page 8 of 8 ends

WEST HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE AMBULANCE SERVICE

Signature: _________________________
Name: Kristin Clark
Title: Chancellor
Address: 275 Phelps Ave
Coalinga, CA 93210
Signature: __________________________
Name: Greg Chastain
Title: Fire Chief
Address: 496 E. Tulare St
Dinuba, CA 93618
Phone: (559) 591-5931
Signature: _________________________
Name: Shanna Ahrens
Title: Vice Chancellor of Business and Fiscal
Services
Address: 275 Phelps Ave
Coalinga, CA 93210 Signature: _________________________ Name: James Preston
Title: President, West Hills College Lemoore
Address: 555 College Ave
Lemoore, CA 93245
City Council Staff Report
Department: FINANCE SERVICES July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
By: Jacqueline Lopez, Senior Fiscal Analyst
Subject:

Resolution No. 2024-55 Approving Adjustments to the 2023/24 Budget (KS)

RECOMMENDATION
Council Adopt Resolution No. 2024-55 approving budget amendments for the Fiscal Year End 2023/24.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The year-end adjustments are necessary to ensure that the budget is balanced at the end of the fiscal year. As such, staff is recommending budget amendments to reflect changes through the second half of the budget year.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
Several year-end budget amendments are being proposed to align the expenditures and revenues to the budget. They are detailed in Attachment 'A' and are summarized as follows:

General Fund
An overall increase to revenues in the amount of $1,301,403 was due to Utility Electric User Tax, Business Licenses, Right of Way (ROW) Encroachment Permits, Building Permits and interest earnings. Total increases to expenses of $1,092,324 include unforeseen expenditures including the demolition of the Strand Theater, repairs to the antique clock at the Historical Society, a replacement HVAC at the Fire Department Administrative Office, increases to electric costs, and various improvements including the Kamm/Crawford sidewalk and the West El Monte right of way Landscaping.

Capital Funds
In the Transportation Capital Projects fund, increase to revenues in the amount of $399,047 and an increase in expenses in the amount of $3,552,662 for the following projects: El Monte and Road 56 Roundabout, City Wide Street Improvement Project, City Sidewalk and Alley Improvements, ADA Ramps, Road 74 and the Dinuba Pedestrian Walkway Improvement Project.

In the Capital Facilities Projects Fund, a decrease in transfers in, in the amount of $335,000 for the reallocation of funds to the Transportation Capital Projects fund for the City-Wide Street Improvement Project. An increase of $1,193,373 for the following projects: Entertainment Plaza, Fire Station Improvements, Viscaya Park, KC Vista Park Improvements, Senior Center Reroof, and the Strand Theater Demolition.

Enterprise Funds
In the Water Fund, an increase to revenues in the amount of $54,300 for delinquent fees and penalties. An increase to expense in the amount of $151,327 for the purchase of water meters, asphalt alley repairs, the lease of city trucks, and repairs to the back flow system for the Mercantile Row.

In the Sewer Fund, an increase to revenues for delinquent penalties. An increase to expenses in the amount of $203,076 for the repairs, maintenance, and cleaning of sewer lift stations, sewer lift hatch replacements, the purchase of pumps for the stations.

In Disposal Fund, an increase to revenues for delinquent penalties and for more interest earnings.

In the Ambulance Fund, an increase to revenues in the amount of $331,325 to adjust for additional service revenue, interest earnings and a prior year receipt of Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) revenue.

Special Revenue
American Rescue Plan Act
An overall increase to revenues in the amount of $25,000 was due to interest and decreases of $126,631 to transfers out as the expense was made in the prior fiscal year for the Clarifier Project.

A reallocation of funds from the Capital Facilities to Transportation Construction for the City-wide Street Improvement Project that include Street Reconstruction and Street Rehabilitation of various roads is also needed for $335,000.

Special Community Events
An overall increase to revenues in the amount of $30,500 was due to donations for several events such as the BBQ Fest and summer night lights. A total increase to expenses of $14,400 was associated to the events previously mentioned.

Gas Tax and Transportation
An overall increase to expense in the amount of $112,640 was due to pothole repairs, street sign replacement, an adjustment to the unfunded liability and an increase to electric charges.

In the Housing Funds, an increase to HOME fund, the CDBG fund and the STBG fund for loan payoffs and increase in interest earnings. Increase to expenses for house rehabilitation loans, home loans, and for the El Monte Revitalization Plan.

In the Assessment District Funds, an increase to revenue being received from the annexation of new zones and an increase to expenses for the ponding basin weed abatement.

FISCAL IMPACT
After the budget amendments, revenues and expenditures for all fund types are expected to be on target for year-end.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 2024-55; Exhibit '1' 2023-24 Year-End Budget Amendments

Attachment ‘A’
RESOLUTION 2024-55

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA

APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR END 2023/24
WHEREAS, the FY 2023/2024 Annual Budget reflects the City of Dinuba’s ongoing commitment to providing core services to the community consistent with the strategic goals established by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the FY 2023/24 Annual Budget; was approved by the City Council on June 27, 2023 by Resolution 2023-35 and any subsequent amendments must be approved by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, a budget amendment is necessary to align the expected revenues and expected expenses,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Dinuba City Council hereby resolves that the FY 2023/2024 budget be amended to provide the necessary funding to various funds.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9 day of July 2024, at a regular meeting of the Dinuba City Council by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: ATTEST:
_______________________ __________________________
Mayor of the City of Dinuba City Clerk

City Council Staff Report
Department: FINANCE SERVICES July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
By: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director
Subject: Warrant Register June 28 & July 5, 2024 (KS)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
None.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

PUBLIC HEARING
None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
WR 06.28.2024
WR 07.05.2024
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1143 - AAA Quality Services, Inc.
00120493 FY23/24-Parks-Portable restroom
rental/service-Vuich-5/31-6/29
Paid by Check #47671 05/31/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 610.66 Vendor 1143 - AAA Quality Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $610.66 Vendor 1925 - Abel's Towing & Detailing
61924 Abels Towing- Bus-10 Paid by Check #47672 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 350.00 Vendor 1925 - Abel's Towing & Detailing Totals Invoices 1 $350.00 Vendor 479 - Able Industries
524012 able prop. facility Paid by Check #47673 05/31/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 3,117.50 Vendor 479 - Able Industries Totals Invoices 1 $3,117.50 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators
Funding 6/21/24 Miscellaneous Paid by Check #47674 06/21/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 30,861.62 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators Totals Invoices 1 $30,861.62 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing
40650 allstar towing pd-17 Paid by Check #47675 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 120.00 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing Totals Invoices 1 $120.00
Vendor 20 - Ameritas Life Insurance
6/1/24-6/30/24 010-007745-00000 Paid by Check #47676 06/03/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 22,132.32 Vendor 20 - Ameritas Life Insurance Totals Invoices 1 $22,132.32 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross
000335335344 FY 24/25 Harman 532W04713
7/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47680 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 132.70 000335338473 FY 24/25 Hartley 919M97599
07/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47677 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 132.70 000335344570 FY 24/25 Tyler 299A24237
07/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47684 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 100.60 000335351428 FY 24/25 Medders 975A79192
07/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47682 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 132.70 000335353473 FY 24/25 Magyar 792A24403
07/01/24-07/31/24
Paid by Check #47681 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 100.60 000335572999 FY 24/25 Sano 569W17892
07/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47679 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 139.60 000336996131 FY 24/25 Tyler 141A75193
07/01/24-07/31/24
Paid by Check #47683 06/08/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 282.18 000337074742 FY 24/25 Hartley 925M97595
07/01/2024-07/31/2024
Paid by Check #47678 06/08/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 294.50 10102559 FY 24/25 Billing 07/01/2024-
08/01/2024
Paid by Check #47685 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 652.50 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross Totals Invoices 9 $1,968.08 Vendor 2091 - AP Triton, LLC
2024-326 Master Plan Paid by Check #47686 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 6,716.00 Vendor 2091 - AP Triton, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $6,716.00 Vendor 145 - Arbitrage Compliance Specialists
Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 1 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 1035967 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds,
Issue of 2014
Paid by Check #47687 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,750.00 Vendor 145 - Arbitrage Compliance Specialists Totals Invoices 1 $1,750.00 Vendor 17 - AT&T
238451821406/24 405 E El Monte Way 06/07/24-
07/06/24
Paid by Check #47688 06/07/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 64.10 Vendor 17 - AT&T Totals Invoices 1 $64.10
Vendor 376 - BCS Consulting, LLC
2024110 Monthly IT Service - May 2024 Paid by Check #47689 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 6,200.00 2024112 FY23/24-Sportsplex-upgrades to
facility-tech/internet/phones
Paid by Check #47689 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 9,028.91 Vendor 376 - BCS Consulting, LLC Totals Invoices 2 $15,228.91 Vendor 822 - Boundtree Medical LLC
85375383 Supplies Paid by Check #47690 06/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 136.50 85382986 Supplies Paid by Check #47690 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 31.99 85386921 Supplies Paid by Check #47690 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 462.25 Vendor 822 - Boundtree Medical LLC Totals Invoices 3 $630.74 Vendor 116 - BSK Analytical Laboratories
AH14178 bsk June 20224 Bacti report Paid by Check #47691 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 152.00 AH14187 bsk June 2024 Bacti report Paid by Check #47691 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 152.00 AH14300 bsk nitrate Paid by Check #47691 06/17/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 66.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Analytical Laboratories Totals Invoices 3 $370.00 Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc. 19883 Repairs Paid by Check #47692 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 950.00 Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $950.00 Vendor 8 - City of Dinuba
PettyCash 6/2024 Reimbursement Paid by Check #47693 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 111.71 Vendor 8 - City of Dinuba Totals Invoices 1 $111.71
Vendor 170 - Comcast
0148178 06/12/24 680 S ALTA AVE OFC 06/17/24-
07/16/24
Paid by Check #47694 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 584.62 Vendor 170 - Comcast Totals Invoices 1 $584.62
Vendor 1952 - Conn Doors
34470 FY23/24-Senior Centerinstall/replace building door framePaid by Check #47695 06/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/20/2024 06/28/2024 4,513.37 Vendor 1952 - Conn Doors Totals Invoices 1 $4,513.37
Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer
C26768 courier window envelops Paid by Check #47696 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 868.00 Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer Totals Invoices 1 $868.00 Vendor 378 - Cummins Allison Corp.
1466431 FY 25 SERVICE CONTRACT

JETSCAN
Paid by Check #47697 05/31/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 673.20 Vendor 378 - Cummins Allison Corp. Totals Invoices 1 $673.20 Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 2 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 30 - Dinuba Chamber of Commerce
APRIL-JUNE 2024 DINUBA MAIN STREET FUND Paid by Check #47698 06/27/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 169.75 Vendor 30 - Dinuba Chamber of Commerce Totals Invoices 1 $169.75 Vendor 1591 - Environment Control
24144-299 environment control monthly
janitorial maintenance June 2024
Paid by Check #47699 06/01/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 9,859.69 Vendor 1591 - Environment Control Totals Invoices 1 $9,859.69 Vendor 16 - Ernest Packaging Solutions
90967201 FY23/24-Parks-Cleaning/operating
parks supplies
Paid by Check #47700 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/20/2024 06/28/2024 1,134.92 Vendor 16 - Ernest Packaging Solutions Totals Invoices 1 $1,134.92 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman
June-August 2024 Anthem Reimb 6/01/2024-
8/31/2024
Paid by Check #47701 06/20/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 880.30 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman Totals Invoices 1 $880.30 Vendor 139 - Henry Schein Inc.
95500158 Supplies Paid by Check #47702 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 274.30 95548530 Supplies Paid by Check #47702 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 494.43 95950034 Supplies Paid by Check #47702 06/21/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 353.12 Vendor 139 - Henry Schein Inc. Totals Invoices 3 $1,121.85 Vendor 2089 - Tyler Hensley
000242305 FY23/24-Sports-Lifeguard
training/certification-5 staff
Paid by Check #47703 05/29/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/05/2024 06/28/2024 825.00 Vendor 2089 - Tyler Hensley Totals Invoices 1 $825.00
Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security
677143 FY23/24-Senior Center-Alarm
security services/lease-July 2024
Paid by Check #47704 06/20/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 111.00 Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security Totals Invoices 1 $111.00 Vendor 2090 - Ivy Hill Landscaping
ID2024-02 FY23/24-Special Events-Indep.

Day Event 2024- Live
Entertainment
Paid by Check #47705 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 400.00 Vendor 2090 - Ivy Hill Landscaping Totals Invoices 1 $400.00 Vendor 253 - Jam Services Inc.
179963 jam service 35 first light 35 WLB
Solar Lit Nollard
Paid by Check #47706 06/03/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 47,840.13 Vendor 253 - Jam Services Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $47,840.13 Vendor 1917 - Kimball Midwest
102317396 kimball supplies Paid by Check #47707 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 711.32 Vendor 1917 - Kimball Midwest Totals Invoices 1 $711.32 Vendor 1181 - McCormick, Kabot & Lew
15133 General Matters March 2024 Paid by Check #47708 03/25/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,690.40 15134 Retainer March 2024 Paid by Check #47708 03/25/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 3,300.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 3 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1181 - McCormick, Kabot & Lew Totals Invoices 2 $5,990.40 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc.
4141429 moore industrial Paid by Check #47709 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 88.00 4141430 moore in-house Paid by Check #47709 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 249.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $337.00 Vendor 1853 - Kevin Moya
356 L & L Sierra View Ponding Basin Paid by Check #47710 05/21/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 4,500.00 357 L & L Sierra View Ponding Basin Paid by Check #47710 05/21/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,000.00 359 Kevin Moya Yard ServicesRandell/Olive basin PondPaid by Check #47710 05/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 6,000.00 360 Kevin Moya Yard Services- Alta/
Davis Ponding basin
Paid by Check #47710 05/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,000.00 363 Kevin Moya- Wright
basin/Englehart Ditch
Paid by Check #47710 06/04/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 5,000.00 366 Kevin Moya Yard ServicesSaginaw & Euclid BasinPaid by Check #47710 06/21/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 5,500.00 Vendor 1853 - Kevin Moya Totals Invoices 6 $25,000.00
Vendor 1749 - NEOGOV
INV-42147 FY 24/25 governmentjobs.com
subscription
Paid by Check #47711 06/07/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,171.89 Vendor 1749 - NEOGOV Totals Invoices 1 $2,171.89
Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts
3641-202219 Supplies Paid by Check #47712 06/15/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 (7.14) 3641-202426 Supplies Paid by Check #47712 06/16/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 12.35 Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts Totals Invoices 2 $5.21 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD
366226241001 OFFICE SUPPLIES Paid by Check #47713 05/03/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 238.78 371622576001 Admin office supplies Paid by Check #47713 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 117.07 371491735001 Admin office supplies Paid by Check #47713 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 178.96 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD Totals Invoices 3 $534.81 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera
July 2024 FY 24/25 Anthem Reimb
7/01/2024-7/31/2024
Paid by Check #47714 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 312.45 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera Totals Invoices 1 $312.45
Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
4475716051806/24 PGE 180 W MERCED STE A
5/8/24-6/6/24
Paid by Check #47717 06/07/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,034.39 7681012419806/24 PGE 180 W MERCED STE C
5/8/24-6/6/24
Paid by Check #47715 06/07/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 502.92 9750865237306/24 PGE 180 W MERCED STE B5/8/24
-6/6/24
Paid by Check #47716 06/07/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 112.00 2946520700806/24 L & L 05/10/24-06/09/24 Paid by Check #47719 06/10/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 138.93 6021181187606/24 Sportsplex - 201 N URUAPAN
WAY 05/08/24-06/06/24
Paid by Check #47721 06/10/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 3,533.68 Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 4 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 1557710974506/24 Parks 1851 E KAMM AVE
05/10/24-06/09/24
Paid by Check #47718 06/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,898.66 1349716235706/24 KAMM & GREEN 05/09/24-
06/07/24
Paid by Check #47726 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 19,373.71 1561888272206/24 PW 05/14/24-06/11/24 Paid by Check #47727 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 130.09 2073277197506/24 1088 E KAMM AVE 05/10/24-
06/09/24
Paid by Check #47728 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 875.08 3380779542306/24 2007 N CRAWFORD AVE
05/13/24-06/10/24
Paid by Check #47730 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,015.48 4323390246906/24 L & L CITRUS HEIGHTS VENTURA
AND O 05/16/24-06/13/24
Paid by Check #47720 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 82.75 6407995725006/24 PW 05/14/24-06/11/24 Paid by Check #47731 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 4,372.55 8543598174206/24 L & L 05/16/24-06/13/24 Paid by Check #47723 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 265.70 9018373735306/24 L & L DUNMORE HOMES VISCAYA
1 AT SAGINA 05/16/24-06/13/24
Paid by Check #47724 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,221.37 9179222553306/24 PW 05/16/24-06/13/24 Paid by Check #47733 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,099.06 9196176758806/24 L & L SIERRA WAY AND BUENA
VISTA AVE 05/16/24-06/13/24
Paid by Check #47725 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 129.55 8319024072706/24 Parks SW SW 16-16-24 05/10/24
-06/09/24
Paid by Check #47722 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 22.44 9548749847906/24 ALTA & NEBRASKA AVE 05/14/24
-06/11/24
Paid by Check #47734 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 117.62 3166578419006/24 3007 W KAMM AVE 05/17/24-
06/16/24
Paid by Check #47729 06/17/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,620.51 8866956432506/24 NW SE SW 18 16 24 05/17/24-
06/16/24
Paid by Check #47732 06/17/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 33.84 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 20 $39,580.33 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services
6/24 FOR 5/24 MAY 2024 Monthly Disposal
Charges
Paid by Check #47735 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 152,312.47 FY 25 JULY 2024 FY 25.26 CONTRACT Disposal
payment for JULY 2024
Paid by Check #47735 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 60,000.00 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services Totals Invoices 2 $212,312.47 Vendor 207 - Polydene Inc.
1840197 Polydyne Dinuba WWRP Paid by Check #47736 06/10/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 10,073.33 Vendor 207 - Polydene Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $10,073.33 Vendor 1906 - Benjamin Prado
NALEO LV 6/17/24 NALEO Las Vegas Conference Paid by Check #47670 06/12/2024 06/14/2024 06/14/2024 06/25/2024 271.00 NALEO LV Hotel B Reimb Exp - Las Vegas Hotel
06/17/24-06/21/24
Paid by Check #47670 06/25/2024 06/25/2024 06/25/2024 06/25/2024 792.41 Vendor 1906 - Benjamin Prado Totals Invoices 2 $1,063.41 Vendor 1565 - Quadient Finance USA, Inc.
6/9/24 POSTAGE Paid by Check #47737 06/09/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,500.00 Vendor 1565 - Quadient Finance USA, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,500.00 Vendor 1099 - Ramirez Mobile Car Wash Inc.

Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 5 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 0019 PD - Repairs/Labor - U#6 -
DA2402059
Paid by Check #47738 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 385.00 Vendor 1099 - Ramirez Mobile Car Wash Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $385.00 Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System
RIS-POS02-57730 RIS Valve Paid by Check #47739 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 134.07 RIS-POS02-57903 FY23/24-Park-Irrigation
parts/supplies-KC Park
Paid by Check #47739 06/18/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/21/2024 06/28/2024 261.14 Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System Totals Invoices 2 $395.21 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West
179628 rodeo boots Joel 2nd pair Paid by Check #47740 03/20/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 150.00 180653 rodeo boot Cosme 2nd pair Paid by Check #47740 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 150.00 180654 rodeo boots Raul 2nd pair Paid by Check #47740 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 150.00 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West Totals Invoices 3 $450.00 Vendor 1707 - RRM Design Group
2249-01-0424 Dinuba Downtown Civic Square
Conceptual Plan
Paid by Check #47741 05/20/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 14,351.75 2249-01-0524 RRM Design Group- Downtown
Civic Square
Paid by Check #47741 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 4,840.75 Vendor 1707 - RRM Design Group Totals Invoices 2 $19,192.50 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises
BA21 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES JANUARY 1-31
2023
Paid by Check #47742 08/11/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,087.61 DINSP07-23 SELF HELP- LOAN PORTFOLIO

MANAGEMENT
Paid by Check #47742 08/11/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,190.00 SUB#21 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES JAN 1-31 2023
Paid by Check #47742 08/11/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 107.76 SUB#22 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES APRIL 1-30 2023
Paid by Check #47742 08/16/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 319.97 SUB#23 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES JUNE 1-30 2023
Paid by Check #47742 08/18/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,251.00 SUB#24 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES JULY 1-31 2023
Paid by Check #47742 08/23/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 624.62 DIN21RE 11/1/23 Self Help- General Admin &
Account Delivery DIN21RE
Paid by Check #47742 11/01/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 13,164.63 DIN21HB 11/6/23 SELF HELP- DIN21HB GENERAL
ADMIN APRIL- JUNE 2023
Paid by Check #47742 11/06/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,598.25 BA22 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES FEB 1-28 2023
Paid by Check #47742 02/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,470.76 BA23 SELF-HELP -CV2SUB
EXPENDITURES MARCH 1-31
2023
Paid by Check #47742 02/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 3,064.71 BA24 CDBG-CV2BA Business Assistance
& Implementation Cost
Paid by Check #47742 02/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 37,549.38 Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 6 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount DIN21HB 3/5/24 SELF HELP- DIN21HB GENREAL
ADMIN/ ACTIVITY JANUARY 2024
Paid by Check #47742 03/05/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,090.24 DIN21RE 3/6/24 Self Help-General Admin &
Account Delivery DIN21RE
January 2024
Paid by Check #47742 03/06/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 8,183.17 BA25 SELF-HELP -CV2BA
EXPENDITURES AUGUST 1-30
2023
Paid by Check #47742 03/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 58.96 DIN21SL 3/11/24 SELF HELP- DIN21SL GENERAL
ADMIN JAN 2024
Paid by Check #47742 03/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 321.52 DIN21SL 3/11/24B SELF HELP- DIN21SL GENERAL
ADMIN JULY-DEC 2023
Paid by Check #47742 03/11/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 441.54 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises Totals Invoices 16 $72,524.12 Vendor 1859 - Simplot Grower Solutions, Simplot Partners, Simplo 223019270 simplot cutrine plus Paid by Check #47743 06/17/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 921.80 Vendor 1859 - Simplot Grower Solutions, Simplot Partners, Simplo Totals Invoices 1 $921.80 Vendor 2084 - Superior Plus Energy Services Inc
21294084 Superior Plus Propane- Propane Paid by Check #47744 06/06/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 1,022.03 21378408 Superior Plus Propane- Propane Paid by Check #47744 06/06/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 871.22 Vendor 2084 - Superior Plus Energy Services Inc Totals Invoices 2 $1,893.25 Vendor 163 - TAG/AMS Inc.
2831488 Random test Gonzalez Cruz Paid by Check #47745 12/15/2023 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 170.00 Vendor 163 - TAG/AMS Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $170.00
Vendor 717 - TMI Research Services
CITYOD 24-5-31 Service Month May 2024 Paid by Check #47746 05/31/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 420.00 Vendor 717 - TMI Research Services Totals Invoices 1 $420.00 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. 4004165930 toyota lease Paid by Check #47747 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 950.73 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $950.73 Vendor 49 - Tulare County
IN0216110 FY23/24-Special Events-Indep.

Day Celeb- Tul.Co. Food permit
fee
Paid by Check #47748 06/17/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/24/2024 06/28/2024 472.00 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 1 $472.00
Vendor 1962 - UBEO Business Services
4519992 Laserfiche renewal 07/2/24-
07/1/25
Paid by Check #47749 05/23/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 4,750.00 Vendor 1962 - UBEO Business Services Totals Invoices 1 $4,750.00 Vendor 273 - US Bank
06/18/2024 Safe Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund
Paid by EFT #3020 06/18/2024 06/24/2024 06/24/2024 06/24/2024 224,124.99 06/24/2024 2014 Successor Paid by EFT #3019 06/24/2024 06/25/2024 06/25/2024 06/25/2024 680,750.00 Vendor 273 - US Bank Totals Invoices 2 $904,874.99
Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless
Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 7 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 9964165682 Administration 04/15/24-05/14/24 Paid by Check #47752 05/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 120.85 9964165683 CM & Council 04/15/24-05/14/24 Paid by Check #47753 05/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 286.60 9966264182 PD - 05/11/2024 - 06/10/2024
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #47750 06/10/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,159.60 9966520467 May/June 2024 Paid by Check #47751 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 394.28 9966625328 Administration 05/15/24-06/14/24 Paid by Check #47752 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 129.14 9966625329 CM & Council 05/15/24-06/14/24 Paid by Check #47753 06/14/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 288.76 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless Totals Invoices 6 $3,379.23 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC
5031420029 FY23/24-Parks-uniform
allowance/safety/op supplies-Wk
of 6/12/24
Paid by Check #47754 06/12/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/13/2024 06/28/2024 404.85 5031423276 FY23/24-Parks-uniform
allowance/safety supplies-wk of
6/19/24
Paid by Check #47754 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/20/2024 06/28/2024 120.84 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC Totals Invoices 2 $525.69 Vendor 1382 - XiO, Inc.
2022-13184 XiO monthly monitoring, FIU,
Quarterly
Paid by Check #47755 06/15/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,967.00 Vendor 1382 - XiO, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,967.00
Vendor Eddie Chavez
2183.57 Refund Building Permit cancelled
2024-00000441
Paid by Check #47756 06/27/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 2,183.57 Vendor Eddie Chavez Totals Invoices 1 $2,183.57
Vendor Josefina Ibarra
Josefina6/19/24 Refund of Business License fee.

License #1774
Paid by Check #47757 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 143.30 Vendor Josefina Ibarra Totals Invoices 1 $143.30
Vendor Josefina C. Silva
TNR2024-9 Trap & Release Program -
Reimbursement
Paid by Check #47758 06/19/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 06/28/2024 50.00 Vendor Josefina C. Silva Totals Invoices 1 $50.00
Grand Totals Invoices 133 $1,471,204.48
Run by Rosemary Silva on 06/27/2024 01:54:53 PM Page 8 of 8 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/22/24 - 06/28/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1143 - AAA Quality Services, Inc.
00348755 FY2024-Parks-Portable restroom
service-Centennial Park- June
Paid by Check #47760 06/29/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 196.36 00348756 FY2024-Parks-Portable restroom
service-Nebraska Park- June
Paid by Check #47760 06/29/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 300.13 00348767 FY2024-Parks-Portable Restroom
Srvc.-Centennial Park - June
Paid by Check #47760 06/29/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 283.14 00348769 FY2024-Parks-Portable restroom
service-Vuich Park- June
Paid by Check #47760 06/29/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 265.66 Vendor 1143 - AAA Quality Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 4 $1,045.29 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators
6/07/24 Funding FY 23/24 6/07/24 Funding Paid by Check #47761 06/07/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 28,967.67 6/28/24 Funding FY 23/24 6/28/24 Funding Paid by Check #47761 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 8,066.71 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators Totals Invoices 2 $37,034.38 Vendor 620 - Lizet Aldaz
EAR062024 PD - Educational Assistance
Reimbursement
Paid by Check #47762 06/30/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 207.60 Vendor 620 - Lizet Aldaz Totals Invoices 1 $207.60
Vendor 2096 - Appliance World Plus
07/01/2024 Maintanence & repair to Ridge
Creek walk in cooler
Paid by Check #47759 07/01/2024 07/01/2024 07/01/2024 07/01/2024 750.00 Vendor 2096 - Appliance World Plus Totals Invoices 1 $750.00 Vendor 17 - AT&T
9391054736 06/24 PD - 05/20/2024 - 06/19/2024
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #47763 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 131.37 Vendor 17 - AT&T Totals Invoices 1 $131.37
Vendor 65 - Banner Pest Control
216187 PD - Removal of Pigeons
Downtown
Paid by Check #47764 06/04/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 75.00 216421 PD - Removal of Pigeons
Downtown
Paid by Check #47764 06/18/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 75.00 Vendor 65 - Banner Pest Control Totals Invoices 2 $150.00 Vendor 1869 - Bass Mekanics Car Audio
#REC011 FY2024-Sports-2024
baseball/softball All-Stars jerseys
Paid by Check #47765 06/17/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 464.00 #REC012 FY2024-Youth Services- ASP staff
shirts
Paid by Check #47765 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 900.00 Vendor 1869 - Bass Mekanics Car Audio Totals Invoices 2 $1,364.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates
AH14486 bsk well #18 FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47766 06/18/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 55.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates Totals Invoices 1 $55.00
Vendor 1668 - Caddyshack Rodent Service, LLC
6570 caddy rodent control FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47767 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 942.50 Vendor 1668 - Caddyshack Rodent Service, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $942.50 Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 1 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2
4194898657 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 51.22 4194898717 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 141.99 4194898754 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 310.54 4194899002 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 343.20 4195089468 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/06/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 178.66 4195089504 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/06/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 128.06 4195089621 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/06/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,111.77 4195571941 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 112.32 4195571943 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 30.62 4195571946 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 333.67 4195571960 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 220.99 4195572012 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 148.65 4195572112 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/12/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 234.97 4195790575 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/13/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 128.06 4195790592 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/13/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 178.66 4195790816 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/13/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,704.22 1904935073 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/17/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 520.80 4196293798 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 51.22 4196293808 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 310.54 4196293837 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 112.32 4196293946 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 234.97 4196494499 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 128.06 4196494541 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 178.66 5217438312 FY 23/24 Parks supplies Paid by Check #47769 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 17.60 1904940950 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 195.30 1904940953 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 195.30 4197073121 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 30.62 4197073171 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 333.67 4197073188 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 148.65 4197073236 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 112.99 4197073242 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 276.36 4197073410 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 235.19 4197182690 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 128.06 4197182748 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 179.10 4197183353 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 834.53 4196494843 Contractual Paid by Check #47768 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 955.59 Vendor 333 - Cintas Corporation No. 2 Totals Invoices 36 $10,537.13 Vendor 1419 - Collins & Schoettler Planning Consultant, Inc. 000061 Collins city planning serivices FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47770 06/11/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 11,225.00 Vendor 1419 - Collins & Schoettler Planning Consultant, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $11,225.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 2 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 1992 - Melvin R Cox
200077 FY 2024- Mel Cox shopping cart
retrieval June 2024
Paid by Check #47771 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 285.00 Vendor 1992 - Melvin R Cox Totals Invoices 1 $285.00
Vendor 2082 - Debtbook
DB2005280 Lease and SBITA Management &
Premium Implementation
Paid by Check #47772 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 10,000.00 Vendor 2082 - Debtbook Totals Invoices 1 $10,000.00
Vendor 77 - Department of Justice
743964 PD - Blood Alcohol Analysis / May
2024
Paid by Check #47773 06/07/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 70.00 Vendor 77 - Department of Justice Totals Invoices 1 $70.00 Vendor 552 - Dragnet Pest Control
1283-07-2024 FY2024-Senior Center-Pest
control services - June 2024
Paid by Check #47774 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 68.00 Vendor 552 - Dragnet Pest Control Totals Invoices 1 $68.00 Vendor 309 - Elbert Distributing
24115110 elbert distributing inventory FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47775 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 109.17 Vendor 309 - Elbert Distributing Totals Invoices 1 $109.17 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products
22629855 FY2024-Parks-Irrigation
supplies/parts-Repair/Maint.

Paid by Check #47776 06/18/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 208.85 22729607 FY2024-Parks-Irrigation
supplies/parts-Repair/Maint.

Paid by Check #47776 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 418.57 22729776 FY2024-Parks-Irrigation
supplies/parts-Repair/Maint.

Paid by Check #47776 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 (58.52) Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products Totals Invoices 3 $568.90 Vendor 252 - Geil Enterprises, Inc.
448471 geil Quartey service FY 24/25 Paid by Check #47777 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 333.00 448591 geil Quartey service FY 24/25 Paid by Check #47777 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 222.00 448592 geil Quartey service FY 24/25 Paid by Check #47777 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 309.00 448609 PD - Jul - Sep 2024 Quarterly
Service
Paid by Check #47777 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 102.00 Vendor 252 - Geil Enterprises, Inc. Totals Invoices 4 $966.00 Vendor 1955 - Goldstreet Design Agency, Inc
3247 FY 2024- Goldstreet water quality
report
Paid by Check #47778 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,625.00 Vendor 1955 - Goldstreet Design Agency, Inc Totals Invoices 1 $1,625.00 Vendor 1841 - Hamner, Jewell & Associates
203731 hamner jewell McKinley Ave. FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47779 06/17/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 206.67 Vendor 1841 - Hamner, Jewell & Associates Totals Invoices 1 $206.67 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno
Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 3 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 696435 PD - Copiers Maintenance Paid by Check #47780 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 490.35 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno Totals Invoices 1 $490.35 Vendor 208 - Interwest Consulting Group Inc.
313421 interest rev 1 of Ti remodel of
McDonalds FY 23/24
Paid by Check #47781 03/08/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 227.13 Vendor 208 - Interwest Consulting Group Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $227.13 Vendor 213 - Javelina Trading Company
2406007 javelina cordless tool kit FY 24/25 Paid by Check #47782 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 3,559.68 Vendor 213 - Javelina Trading Company Totals Invoices 1 $3,559.68 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co.
6138010 FY2024-Senior Center-Safety-Fire
extinguisher semi annual srvc.

Paid by Check #47783 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 227.13 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co. Totals Invoices 1 $227.13
Vendor 1917 - Kimball Midwest
102365734 kimball supplies FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47784 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 371.04 Vendor 1917 - Kimball Midwest Totals Invoices 1 $371.04 Vendor 1403 - Kings Industrial Occupational Medical Center, Inc. 235337 FY 23/24 Service Month April
2024
Paid by Check #47785 05/06/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 425.00 Vendor 1403 - Kings Industrial Occupational Medical Center, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $425.00 Vendor 89 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
7/01/24-6/30/25 DI030-10000 Membership
7/01/24-6/30/25
Paid by Check #47786 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 3,065.00 Vendor 89 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Totals Invoices 1 $3,065.00 Vendor 1723 - Matson Alarm Co, Inc.
4876220 Fire & Security Monitoring -405 E
El Monte Way 07/01/24-07/31/24
Paid by Check #47787 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 118.00 Vendor 1723 - Matson Alarm Co, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $118.00 Vendor 1913 - Metro Uniform & Accessories
281304 PD - PD Volunteer Uniform -
Aaron Gomes
Paid by Check #47788 06/07/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 150.76 281461 PD - PD Volunteer Uniform -
Arcenia Villegas
Paid by Check #47788 06/11/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 109.11 281798 PD - PD Volunteer Uniform - Mike
Smith
Paid by Check #47788 06/18/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 59.43 Vendor 1913 - Metro Uniform & Accessories Totals Invoices 3 $319.30 Vendor 1931 - MissionSquare Plan Services
2025-00000007 30 - 457 - Employee
MissionSquare $*
Paid by EFT #3023 07/03/2024 07/03/2024 07/03/2024 07/03/2024 2,880.17 Vendor 1931 - MissionSquare Plan Services Totals Invoices 1 $2,880.17 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc.
4141495 moore industrial FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47789 06/19/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 88.00 4141555 moore in-house FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47789 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 336.00 4141727 moore industrial FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47789 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 88.00 Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 4 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 4141728 moore industrial FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47789 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 86.00 4141788 moore industrial FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47789 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 88.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc. Totals Invoices 5 $686.00 Vendor 88 - Municipal Maintenance Equipment Inc.
023905 mme U-04 FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47790 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 897.70 Vendor 88 - Municipal Maintenance Equipment Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $897.70 Vendor 899 - NBS
202406-2318 Professional Services 07/01/2024-
09/30/2024 CFD-2018-1
Paid by Check #47791 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 4,731.40 202406-2331 Professional Services 07/01/2024-
09/30/2024 Assessments Fee
Paid by Check #47791 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 7,777.28 Vendor 899 - NBS Totals Invoices 2 $12,508.68
Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD
370896385001 FY2024-Senior CenterOffice/operating suppliesPaid by Check #47792 06/07/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 115.59 370894851001 FY2024-Senior CenterOffice/operating suppliesPaid by Check #47792 06/09/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 25.54 370869076001 PD - Supplies Paid by Check #47792 06/11/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 362.30 370922695001 PD - Supplies Paid by Check #47792 06/11/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 35.47 Vendor 142 - Office Depot BSD Totals Invoices 4 $538.90 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
50086645V2 PG&E Kamm and Alta Roundabout
FY 23/24
Paid by Check #47793 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 269,570.29 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 1 $269,570.29 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services
822728 FY2024-Parks-Yard waste
disposal-Rose Ann Vuich Park
Paid by Check #47794 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 701.08 822735 penas sweeper,disp. fee,
contractual. FY 23/24
Paid by Check #47794 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,889.24 Vendor 7 - Pena's Disposal Services Totals Invoices 2 $2,590.32 Vendor 2097 - Pneu-Dart, Inc.
389634 PD - Supplies / ACO Grant Paid by Check #47795 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,827.06 389635 PD - Supplies / ACO Grant Paid by Check #47795 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 392.68 389636 PD - Supplies / ACO Grant Paid by Check #47795 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 41.71 Vendor 2097 - Pneu-Dart, Inc. Totals Invoices 3 $2,261.45 Vendor 1906 - Benjamin Prado
Reimb 6/21/24 FY 23/24 Reimb luggage fee Paid by Check #47796 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 75.00 Vendor 1906 - Benjamin Prado Totals Invoices 1 $75.00
Vendor 2093 - Print Theory
7534 FY2024-Sportsplex-UniformSportsplex staff shirtsPaid by Check #47797 05/16/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 777.57 7744 FY2024-Multiple divisionsUniform/safety staff hatsPaid by Check #47797 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 604.84 Vendor 2093 - Print Theory Totals Invoices 2 $1,382.41
Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 5 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 275 - Proforce Marketing Inc.
551980 PD - Range/Armory Supplies - 3
SIG
Paid by Check #47798 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 2,180.81 Vendor 275 - Proforce Marketing Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,180.81 Vendor 688 - Rogelio Ramirez
June 2024 FY 23/24 Anthem Reimb
6/01/2024-6/30/2024
Paid by Check #47799 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 359.59 Vendor 688 - Rogelio Ramirez Totals Invoices 1 $359.59
Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System
RIS-POS02-58181 FY2024-Parks-Irrigation
supplies/parts-Repair/Maint.-
Viscaya
Paid by Check #47800 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 276.34 RIS-POS02-58197 FY2024-Parks-Irrigation
supplies/parts-Repair/Maint.

Paid by Check #47800 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 30.79 Vendor 38 - Reedley Irrigation System Totals Invoices 2 $307.13 Vendor 349 - RES COM Pest Control
2232181 PD - Dog Kennels Pest Control Paid by Check #47801 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 48.00 Vendor 349 - RES COM Pest Control Totals Invoices 1 $48.00 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West
180655 rodeo Alex 2nd pair of boots FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47802 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 150.00 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West Totals Invoices 1 $150.00 Vendor 2004 - SCA of CA, LLC
2024-005388 FY 2024-SCA Street Sweeping for
June 2024
Paid by Check #47803 06/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 15,646.13 Vendor 2004 - SCA of CA, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $15,646.13 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties
177122 scout specialties wastewater FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47804 06/18/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 44.82 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties Totals Invoices 1 $44.82
Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises
BA24- April 2023 FY 2024- BA24 CDBG-CV2BA
APRIL 1-31 2023
Paid by Check #47805 02/23/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 380.80 DIN21HB 6/24/24 FY 2024- GENERAL ADMIN/
ACTIVITY DELIVERY HBMARCH/MAY 2024
Paid by Check #47805 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 4,648.26 DIN21RE 6/24/24 FY 2024- GENERAL ADMIN/

ACTIVITY DELIVERY REHAB- MAY
2024
Paid by Check #47805 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 4,286.15 DIN21SL 6/24/24 FY 2024- Activity delivery: sewer
lateral May 2024
Paid by Check #47805 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 203.64 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises Totals Invoices 4 $9,518.85 Vendor 61 - Silvas Oil Company Inc.
623553 silvas oil dyed diesel fuel FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47806 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 1,985.55 Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 6 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 61 - Silvas Oil Company Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $1,985.55 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts
5080520 062024 PD - Water Coolers Service Paid by Check #47807 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 197.24 Vendor 431 - Sparkletts Totals Invoices 1 $197.24
Vendor 2084 - Superior Plus Energy Services Inc
21619226 FY 2024 - Kamps Propane Paid by Check #47808 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 3,097.82 Vendor 2084 - Superior Plus Energy Services Inc Totals Invoices 1 $3,097.82 Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center
1843 PD - K9 Maintenance Training /
Zeus
Paid by Check #47809 06/22/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 90.00 Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center Totals Invoices 1 $90.00 Vendor 329 - Townsend Public Affairs
21830 CONSULTING JULY 2024 Paid by Check #47810 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 6,000.00 Vendor 329 - Townsend Public Affairs Totals Invoices 1 $6,000.00 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. 4004174479 FY 2024- Toyota polaris lease Paid by Check #47811 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 310.41 Vendor 1633 - Toyota Industries Commercial Finance, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $310.41 Vendor 49 - Tulare County
24569 PD - TR-130 / Notice to Appear
Citation Prints
Paid by Check #47814 06/20/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 907.47 IN0216442 FY2024-Special Events-Indep.

Day food vendor permit fees
Paid by Check #47812 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 1,085.00 20723 PD - 3" Badge Stickers Paid by Check #47813 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 949.38 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 3 $2,941.85
Vendor 273 - US Bank
8693601312426 FY2024-Parks-CNG vehicle fuelJune 2024Paid by Check #47815 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 306.71 532302130 FY 23/24 & FY 24/25 Copier
Lease 06/20/2024 - 07/20/2024
Paid by Check #47816 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 3,903.91 Vendor 273 - US Bank Totals Invoices 2 $4,210.62
Vendor 1682 - USA Shade & Fabric Structures
90709-1 Shade Structure Viscaya Park FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47817 06/30/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 13,880.76 Vendor 1682 - USA Shade & Fabric Structures Totals Invoices 1 $13,880.76 Vendor 1434 - Vast Networks
55541 07/01/2024-07/31/2024 Internet Paid by Check #47818 07/01/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 4,625.76 Vendor 1434 - Vast Networks Totals Invoices 1 $4,625.76 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless
9966625325 verizon admin FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47819 06/14/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 339.77 9966625326 FY2024-Multiple divisions-cell
phone service fees
Paid by Check #47820 06/14/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 1,123.40 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless Totals Invoices 2 $1,463.17 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC
Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 7 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 5031426458 FY2024-Parks-Staff
uniforms/safety supplies
Paid by Check #47821 06/26/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 112.85 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC Totals Invoices 1 $112.85 Vendor 2094 - Victory Outreach of Selma
001 FY2024-Special Events-Indep.

Day-support staff parking/cleanup
Paid by Check #47822 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 768.00 Vendor 2094 - Victory Outreach of Selma Totals Invoices 1 $768.00 Vendor 2062 - W & E Electric
2406063 w & e Dinuba waste water FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 395.69 2406064 W & E ROOSEVELT REC. CENTER
FY 23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 991.79 2406065 w & e Dinuba waste water FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 225.00 2406066 w & e Dinuba waste water FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 150.00 2406067 w & e Dinuba waste water FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 615.03 2406099 w & e Dinuba waste water FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47823 06/21/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 225.00 Vendor 2062 - W & E Electric Totals Invoices 6 $2,602.51 Vendor 962 - Willdan Financial Services
00339269 willdan building plan checks FY
23/24
Paid by Check #47824 06/28/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 4,320.00 Vendor 962 - Willdan Financial Services Totals Invoices 1 $4,320.00 Vendor 1382 - XiO, Inc.
20124500 xio pressure monitoring FY 23/24 Paid by Check #47825 06/25/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 956.02 Vendor 1382 - XiO, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $956.02
Vendor Kimberly Lopez
Rfnd-BB24-Lopez FY2024-Sports-Refund-2024
soccer season parent shirt order
Paid by Check #47826 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 30.00 Vendor Kimberly Lopez Totals Invoices 1 $30.00
Vendor Karina Reyes
RFND-BB24-Reyes FY2024-Sports-Refund-2024
youth soccer reg. refund-Sophia
Reyes
Paid by Check #47827 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 06/24/2024 07/05/2024 42.00 Vendor Karina Reyes Totals Invoices 1 $42.00
Vendor William J. Rudy
TNR2024-10 Trap & Release Program -
Reimbursement - FY2024
Paid by Check #47828 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 150.00 Vendor William J. Rudy Totals Invoices 1 $150.00
Vendor William J. Rudy
Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 8 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount TNR2024-11 Trap & Release Program -
Reimbursement - FY2024
Paid by Check #47829 06/27/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 07/05/2024 50.00 Vendor William J. Rudy Totals Invoices 1 $50.00
Grand Totals Invoices 140 $455,624.45
Run by Rosemary Silva on 07/03/2024 10:48:30 AM Page 9 of 9 Accounts Payable Invoice Report
Payment Date Range 06/29/24 - 07/05/24
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
City Council Staff Report
Department: ENGINEER/PLANNING July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Watts, City Engineer
Subject: Future Roundabout Project Discussion (JW)

RECOMMENDATION
Council receive presentation on roundabouts eligible for grant funding and provide direction on prioritization.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On June 20th, the City of Dinuba was notified of the upcoming HSIP (Highway Safety Improvement Program) Cycle 12 grant opportunity. Cycle 12 currently has $300 million dollars available. Of the $300 million dollars, $252 million is available for roundabouts that meet or exceed the BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) requirements. Staff recommends applying for funding for the El Monte/Perry Roundabout.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None

DISCUSSION
The City's Roundabout Feasibility Study (Attachment 'A') was prepared by 4-Creeks Inc. at the direction of City Staff and in coordination with TJKM. The study is intended to serve as a planning-level study to guide the development of roundabout designs at these intersections and be used to apply for future grant funding opportunities.

It is important to prioritize the roundabout projects that will provide the greatest community benefit. As discussed previously on October 25th, 2023, a major way to help prioritize projects is identifying which roundabout locations reduce the chance of injury or fatality in the event of a collision which is the most beneficial to public safety.

Using the collision history gathered by 4-Creeks, the data would show to prioritize the proposed roundabout projects in the following order.

1. El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 56 - Design nearing completion and CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality) construction funding requested from TCAG earlier this year.

2. El Monte Way (Avenue 416) and Perry Avenue - Not included in Roundabout Feasibility Report, but included in the future El Monte Widening Avenue plan from Alta Avenue to Crawford Avenue.

3. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Avenue 400

4. El Monte Way (Avenue 416) & Road 92

5. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424) -Complete

6. Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Kamm Avenue (Avenue 408) - Planning to open September 7th
Due to the success of Alta Avenue (Road 80) & Nebraska Avenue (Avenue 424) roundabout, TCAG has allocated funding for an additional two roundabouts: El Monte Way (Avenue 416) and Road 56 and Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue.

Currently, El Monte Way (Avenue 416) and Perry Avenue is an odd intersection based upon the existing layout and receives traffic congestion during peak hours. In order to help reduce congestion, reduce speeds on El Monte Way, and to eliminate old traffic signal equipment for less maintenance in the future, staff believes this is a critical location to implement a roundabout. Since the City has already requested funding for the El Monte Way (Avenue 416) and Road 56 Roundabout through TCAG for CMAQ funding, staff recommends applying for federal funds for the El Monte Way (Avenue 416) and Perry Avenue Roundabout through the HSIP grant opportunity that is currently due September 7th, 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT
Selecting the next roundabout to request grant funding for has no fiscal impact. If awarded, typically HSIP funding requires a 10% local funding match which will be a fiscal impact and will be addressed in future fiscal budgets.

PUBLIC HEARING
None
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study
Final City of Dinuba
Roundabout Feasibility Study
September 2020

Consultant:
324 S. Santa Fe, Suite A
Visalia, CA 93291
(559) 802-3052
Submitted to City of Dinuba
405 E El Monte Way
Dinuba, CA 93618
(559) 591-5900

Introduction
City of Dinuba
Consultant Team:

Subconsultants:

Public Works Department
• Ismael Hernandez, Public Works Director
4-Creeks, Inc.
• David Duda, AICP, Project Manager
• Molly McDonnel, Associate Planner
• Kyle McDonald, PE, Civil Engineer
• Kevin Clow, EIT, Assistant Engineering Designer
TJKM
• Atul Patel, TE, PTOE
• Rutvij Patel, Project Manager
Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.
• Jason Watts, PE, Civil Engineer
Acknowledgments

Introduction
Table of Contents

1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Objectives of Study................................................................................................................3 Location of Project..............................................................................................................................................3 Physical and Demographic Context.........................................................................................................6 Case Studies........................................................................................................................................................7 Regulatory Context............................................................................................................................................8

2. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................20 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................22 W. El Monte & Road 56...........................................................................................................................22 E. El Monte & Road 92...........................................................................................................................23 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.............................................................................................................25 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...................................................................................................................26 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400......................................................................................................................27

3. Roundabout Design Principles.................................................................................................29 Introduction..................................................................................................................................31 Guidance Documents....................................................................................................................................31 Benefits of Roundabout Intersections......................................................................................................32 Types of Circular Intersections....................................................................................................................34 Key Roundabout Features.............................................................................................................................36 Planning-Level Sizing and Space Requirements.................................................................................39 User Considerations.......................................................................................................................................41 Landscaping.......................................................................................................................................42

4. Proposed Design Concepts.................................................................................................43 Introduction..................................................................................................................................45 W. El Monte & Road 56...........................................................................................................................46 E. El Monte & Road 92...........................................................................................................................47 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.............................................................................................................48 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...................................................................................................................49 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.......................................................................................................................50 Preliminary Landscaping Concept Plan....................................................................................................51 Introduction

5. Action Plan and Implementation............................................................................................53 Feasibility Study Implementation.................................................................................................................55 Right-of-Way Acquisition...............................................................................................................................56 Environmental Review and Compliance Process...............................................................................57 Financial Plan...................................................................................................................................................58 Project Prioritization.......................................................................................................................................67 Figures, Tables, and Appendices
List of Figures
Figure 1-1. City of Dinuba regional location map.................................................................4 Figure 1-2. Proposed roundabout locations....................................................................................5 Figure 1-3. W. El Monte & Road 56, looking south.......................................................................5 Figure 1-4. E. El Monte & Road 92, looking west...................................................................5 Figure 1-5. N. Alta & Nebraska Ave, looking south.................................................................5 Figure 1-6. S. Alta & Kamm Ave, looking north..................................................................5 Figure 1-7. Cultural makeup of the City of Dinuba..........................................................................6 Figure 1-8. Age of Dinuba residents...............................................................................................6 Figure 1-9. Roundabout in Woodlake, CA.....................................................................................7 Figure 1-10. Victoria Avenue in Riverside........................................................................................7 Figure 2-1. Aerial View of W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection..................................22 Figure 2-2. W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection Location. .........................................22 Figure 2-3. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at El Monte & Road 92............................................24 Figure 2-4. Aerial View of E. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection.........................24 Figure 2-5. W. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection Location...............................................24 Figure 2-6. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection...................................................25 Figure 2-7. Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection Location....................................................25 Figure 2-8. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue.......... 25 Figure 2-9. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection....................................................26 Figure 2-10. Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection Location...........................................................................26 Figure 2-11. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue........... 27 Figure 2-12. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection...........................................28 Figure 2-13. Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection Location...........................................................28 Figure 2-14. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue & Avenue 400................................... 28 Figure 3-1. Single-lane roundabout. ...................................................................................................31 Figure 3-2. Roundabout safety features...............................................................................................32 Figure 3-3. Conflict points at roundabouts vs. traditional intersections...................................32 Figure 3-4. Vehicles waiting to enter roundabout.......................................................................33 Introduction
Figure 3-5. Example of rotary intersection........................................................................................34 Figure 3-6. Signalized roundabout in United Kingdom..............................................................34 Figure 3-7. Example of neighborhood traffic circle........................................................................34 Figure 3-8. Single-lane roundabout................................................................................................35 Figure 3-9. Multilane roundabout.....................................................................................................35 Figure 3-10. Oval central island.............................................................................................................36 Figure 3-11. Peanut-shaped central island.......................................................................................36 Figure 3-12. Single-lane roundabout..................................................................................................36 Figure 3-13. Roundabout design features.........................................................................................37 Figure 3-14. Accessible Pedestrian Crossing...................................................................................38 Figure 3-15. Large truck using truck apron on roundabout.....................................................38 Figure 3-16. Large vehicle wheel tracking......................................................................................38 Figure 3-17. Roundabout sizing graph..............................................................................................39 Figure 3-18. Entry sizing variables......................................................................................................40 Figure 3-19. Crosswalk lighting.............................................................................................................41 Figure 3-20. Truncated dome on sidewalk ramp........................................................................41 Figure 3-21. Roundabout dryscaping in Arizona.......................................................................42 Figure 3-22. Elaborate roundabout landscaping in Chico, California.......................................42 Figure 3-23. Example of public art in roundabout central island, Lansing, MI.......................42 Figure 3-24. Example of public art in central island, Sarasota, FL ......................................................42 Figure 4-1. Proposed Design Concept Locations.......................................................................45 Figure 4-2. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 56......................46 Figure 4-3. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 92.......................47 Figure 4-4. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue.........48 Figure 4-5. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue...............49 Figure 4-6. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.....................50 Figure 4-7. Conceptual Central Island Landscaping and Monument Signage..........52 Figure 4-8. Conceptual Splitter Island Landscaping....................................................................52 Figure 5-1. El Monte & Road 92 ROW Acquisition..............................................................56 Figure 5-2. Alta & Nebraska Ave ROW Acquisition..................................................................56 Figure 5-3. Alta & Kamm Ave ROW Acquisition..........................................................................56 Figure 5-4. Alta & Ave 400 ROW Acquisition..............................................................................56 Figure 5-5. NEPA Process....................................................................................................................57 Figure 5-5. CEQA Process...................................................................................................................58 List of Tables
Table 1. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 56......................................................23 Table 2. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 92.....................................................24 Table 3. Collision History for Alta Ave and Nebraska Avenue......................................26 Table 4. Collision History for Alta Ave and Kamm Avenue......................................................27 Table 5. Collision History for Alta Ave & Avenue 400......................................................28 Table 6. Volume Thresholds for Determining the Number of Entry Lanes Required.......40 Introduction
Table 7. ROW Acquisition Summary...........................................................................................57 Table 8. Cost Estimate Summary..............................................................................................58 Table 9. El Monte & Road 56 Cost Estimate...................................................................59 Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate..................................................................60 Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate.............................................................61 Table 12. S Alta & Kamm Avenue Cost Estimate............................................................63 Table 13. S Alta & Avenue 400 Cost Estimate...............................................................64

1. Introduction
1 2
Introduction
Introduction
Purpose and Objectives of Study
The City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study has been prepared by 4-Creeks Inc. at the direction of the City of Dinuba and in coordination with TJKM. This study was completed in accordance with tasks identified in the 1/28/2020 proposal, and within the scope of work agreed to by the City of Dinuba and by 4-Creeks, Inc. planning/engineering consultant.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of roundabout intersections at five key locations that serve as access points to the City of Dinuba and to present roundabout design concepts for these intersections.

The study will provide information on the existing conditions of these areas, review the current literature to provide an understanding of the principles involved in roundabout design, and propose design concepts for the five intersections involved in this study. The study will also identify possible funding opportunities, constraints, and estimate project costs to promote implementation of the proposed roundabouts.

This feasibility study includes the completion of the following professional services:

1. Description of existing conditions

2. Conceptual designs of each intersection with proposed roundabout (TJKM)

3. Summary of challenges and solutions with each alternative

4. Discussion of right of way or easements needed

5. Discussion of effects on the sounding property owners

6. Discussion of effects on environmental, historic, and culturally sensitive areas (work with City Planner)

7. List of potential permits required to facilitate each alternative

8. CEQA compliance and environmental determination based on coordination with City Contract Planner

9. List of Potential funding sources
Location of Project
As shown in Figure 1-1, the City of Dinuba is located in the north-western portion of Tulare County, approximately 12 miles north of the City of Visalia. The study area involves five intersections that serve as entrances into the City. Three of the proposed roundabout locations are located within City of Dinuba city limits, one is located within the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) and one is located in unincorporated Tulare County. The proposed roundabout locations are listed below and shown in Figure 1-2. • W. El Monte & Road 56
• E. El Monte & Road 92
• N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue
• S. Alta & Kamm Avenue
• S. Alta & Avenue 400
3 Introduction
Introduction
Figure 1-1. City of Dinuba regional location map.
4 Introduction
Figure 1-2. Proposed roundabout locations.
5 Figure 1-3. W. El Monte & Road 56, looking south.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-4. E. El Monte & Road 92, looking west.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-5. N. Alta & Nebraska Ave, looking south.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Figure 1-6. S. Alta & Kamm Ave, looking north.

Source: Google Earth 2019
Introduction
Introduction
Physical and Demographic Context
Diversity
According to the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program, the City of Dinuba has a population of approximately 24,316 as of July 2018. Of that population, 86.9% is Hispanic or Latino, 10.0% is White,

2.3% is Asian, 0.5% is Native American , and 0.4% is Black or African American. 66% of residents speak Spanish at home. Of the approximately 16,000 Spanish speakers, approximately 39% reported speaking English less than “very well.”
Economy
The medium household income in the City of Dinuba is $42,145, which falls below the medium income of California and the United States ($67,739 and $57,617, respectively). Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting are the primary driver of economic activity in Tulare County, and employ approximately 19.6 times more individuals than what is expected for a county this size.

Age
The median age of all residents of the City of Dinuba is 27.3 years years. 35% of all residents are under the age of 18, which is a high percentage when compared to California’s overall average of 22.9%. A graph showing the age distribution of Dinuba residents is shown in Figure 1-8.

Future Growth
The City of Dinuba is projected to grow to more than 34,000 residents by 2026. The City’s General Plan identifies a 3% annual growth rate for the City. Future growth is planned for the west and southern areas of town. This growth is expected to lead to an increase in traffic volumes in and around the City of Dinuba.

Figure 1-7. Cultural makeup of the City of
Dinuba. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau
Figure 1-8. Age of Dinuba residents. Source: 2018 ACS
6 86.9%

10.0%

2.3% 0.8%
Hispanic or Latino
White
Asian
Other
Introduction
Introduction
Case Studies
Roundabouts have been implemented in many communities throughout California due to their ability to improve safety and traffic flow. Roundabouts are becoming increasingly common in the central valley where they are gaining popularity among central valley drivers as more drivers become accustomed to using them. The roundabouts in the City of Dinuba and the City of Reedley, discussed below, are helpful examples that demonstrate successful implementation of roundabout designs in central valley cities.

Valencia Boulevard & Naranjo Boulevard - Woodlake, CA
The roundabout in Woodlake, CA was part of a multi-phased Downtown Enhancement Project and provides an enhanced entrance into the City of Woodlake downtown area. The single-lane, urban roundabout is located at the intersection of Valencia (SR 245) and Naranjo Boulevards (SR 216), which was previously controlled using traffic lights. The roundabout includes a Class II bike lane and multi-use pedestrian and bicycle path to increase accessibility and safety for multi-modal users. The roundabout was ultimately successful in reducing traffic congestion and increasing pedestrian and cyclist mobility.

E Dinuba Avenue & S Buttonwillow Avenue - Reedley, CA
The roundabout in Reedley, CA is located approximately three miles north-west of the City of Dinuba at the intersection of E. Dinuba Avenue and S. Buttonwillow Avenue. The single-lane roundabout replaced a traditional four-way controlled intersection and serves as an entrance into the City of Reedley. The roundabout uses low-profile landscaping to ensure clear sight distances and includes sidewalks and crosswalks for pedestrian connectivity.

Figure 1-9. Roundabout in Woodlake, CA Figure 1-10. Victoria Avenue in Riverside 7 Introduction
Regulatory Context
Federal
National Environmental Policy Act
Any project undertaken on the recommendation of this document may meet the definition of a “project” under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and will be subject to NEPA review if the project receives Federal funding. The City of Dinuba is considered the Lead Agency under NEPA, and thus is obligated to honestly determine whether or not the project is subject to NEPA. If it is, the City of Dinuba must commence with the appropriate level of environmental assessment as stated by NEPA and the various Federal Guidelines adopted to implement the act. The determinations under NEPA that the the City of Dinuba can make as Lead Agency are as follows:

1. The implementation project is not a “federal action” as defined by NEPA, 24 CFR 1508.18 and therefore is not subject to further review under NEPA;

2. The implementation is a Categorically Excluded project pursuant to Federal Guidelines;

3. The implementation project is subject to further environmental study requiring the preparation of an Environmental Assessment pursuant to applicable NEPA Guidelines.

4. Following the NEPA Environmental Assessment, a project will require one of the following environmental documents:
i. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), a document finding the project will not result in significant impacts on the environment, or
ii. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), a document which conducts an in-depth study of potential environmental impacts from the proposed project and recommends mitigation measures and project alternatives. An EIS is the highest order environmental analysis that can be performed under NEPA.

State
California Environmental Quality Act
Any project undertaken on the recommendation of this document may meet the definition of a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Dinuba is the Lead Agency under CEQA, and thus is obligated to honestly determine whether or not the project is subject to CEQA. If it is, the City of Dinuba must commence with the appropriate level of environmental assessment as stated by CEQA and the various State and local Guidelines adopted to implement the act. The determinations under CEQA that the City of Dinuba can make as Lead Agency are as follows:
8 Introduction

1. The implementation project is not a “project” as defined by CEQA, Guidelines Section 1 5 3 78 and therefore is not subject to further review under CEQA;

2. The implementation project is a Categorically Exempt project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15354 and 15300-15333, or is a Categorically Excluded project pursuant to Federal Guidelines;

3. The implementation project is subject to further environmental study requiring the preparation of an Initial Study pursuant to applicable CEQA Guidelines.

4. Following the outcome of the CEQA Initial Study the Lead Agency must cause the preparation of one of the following

5. Environmental documents supported by substantial evidence:
a. Negative Declaration (ND) a document finding the project will not result in significant impacts on the environment;
b. Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) a document finding potential significant impact(s) from the project and citing mitigation measure(s) to reduce impacts to less than significant levels, or that will avoid the impacts. Said mitigation measures must be agreed to by proponent/ applicant prior to public hearing taking action to approve the project, or; c. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is the highest order of environmental analysis that can be required under CEQA. An EIR requires a public hearing on the project and an in-depth analysis of potential Environmental Impacts.

Complete Streets Act
The Complete Streets Act (Assembly Bill 1358) was signed into law by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in September 2008. The law requires cities and counties to ensure that all circulation planning accounts for the needs of all roadway users. Specifically, the law requires cities and counties to ensure that local roads and streets accommodate the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit riders, as well as motorists.

California Department of Transportation 2015-2020 Strategic Management Plan The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) views all transportation improvements as an opportunity to improve sustainability, livability, and the economy. The department of transportation has identified five goals with specific objectives, performance measures, and targets in its 2015-2020 Strategic Management Plan. The outline of these specific goals and objectives are contained in the following section. 9 Introduction
Goal 1: Safety and Health
Provide a safe transportation system for workers and users and promote health through active transportation and reduced pollution in communities
Goal 2: Stewardship and Efficiency
Money counts. Responsibility manage California’s transportation-related assets Goal 3: Sustainability, Livability and Economy
Make long-lasting, smart mobility decisions that improve the environment, support a vibrant economy, and build communities, not sprawl.

Goal 4: System Performance
Utilize leadership, collaboration, and strategic partnerships to develop and integrated transportation system that provides reliable and accessible mobility for travelers.

Goal 5: Organizational Excellence
Be a national leader in delivering quality service through excellent employee performance, public communication, and accountability
California Highway Design Manual (2016)
The California Highway Design Manual (HDM) establishes uniform policies and procedure to carry out the design, implementation and operation of highways for Caltrans, but its guidelines also apply to local streets.

It is updated periodically with the most recent revision related in 2016.

California Department of Transportation Bikeway Classification Class I bikeway: Bike paths or shared use paths, also referred to as “Class I bikeways,” which provide a completely separated right-of-way designed for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with crossflows by motorists minimized.

Class II bikeway: Bike lanes, also referred to as “Class II bikeways,” that provide a restricted right-of-way designed for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of cyclists with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicles parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted.

Class III bikeway: Bike routes referred to as “Class III bikeways” provide a right-of-way onstreet or off-street, designated by signs and permanent markings and shared with pedestrians and motorist.

Class IV bikeway: Cycle tracks or separated bikeways, referred to as “Class IV bikeways,” that promote active transportation and provide a right-of-way designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to a roadway and are separated from vehicular traffic. These types of separation 10 Introduction
include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, or on street parking.

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2014) The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) is the guide to all pavement markings and signs used for traffic control on California streets. It is a state-specific version of the national MUTCD updated every few years. Guidance on roundabout markings and signage is provided in Section 2B.

FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2000)
The FHWA report “Roundabouts: an Informational Guide” was published in June 2000 and provides a comprehensive guide to roundabout site selection and design. The guide addresses the wide range of potential applications of roundabout intersections and addresses topics such as teh definition of a roundabout, what distinguishes roundabouts from traffic circles, public acceptance and legal issues associated with roundabouts, consideration of all user models, etc.

Local
Tulare County General Plan
The Transportation and Circulation section of the Tulare County General Plan document outlines goals and policies to facilities a functional circulation system within Tulare County. In an effort to improve the circulation and mobility throughout Tulare County, multi-modal and complete street goals and polices are incorporated into the Transportation and Circulation element of the Tulare County General Plan.

The goal of this element is to promote an efficient roadway and highway system for the movement of people and goods, which enhances the physical, economic, and social environment while being safe, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective. The following further explains the Tulare County General Plan’s list of policies below. This feasibility study is consistent with the General Plan’s policies.

TC-1.1 Provision of an Adequate Public Road Network
The County shall establish and maintain a public road network comprised of the major facilities illustrated on the Tulare County Road Systems to accommodate projected growth in traffic volume.

TC-1.2 County Improvement Standards
The County’s public roadway system shall be built and maintained consistent with adopted County Improvement Standards, and the need and function of each roadway, within constraints of funding capacity.

TC-1.3 Regional Coordination
The County shall continue to work with State, regional, and local agencies to assess transportation needs and goals and support coordinated transportation planning and programming with the Tulare County 11 Introduction
Association of Governments (TCAG) and other local agencies.

TC-1.4 Funding Sources
The County shall work to enhance funding available for transportation projects. This includes:

1. Working with TCAG, Federal and State agencies, and other available funding sources to maximize funding available to the County for transportation projects and programs, and

2. Enhance local funding sources, including assessment of transportation impact fees to pay for appropriate construction, enhancement, and maintenance of transportation facilities TC-1.5 Public Road System Maintenance
The County shall give priority for maintenance to roadways identified by the Tulare County Pavement Management System (PMS) and other inputs relevant to maintaining the safety and integrity of the County roadway system.

TC-1.6 Intermodal Connectivity
The County shall ensure that, whenever possible, roadway, highway, and public transit systems will interconnect with other modes of transportation. Specifically, the County shall encourage the interaction of truck, rail, and air-freight/passenger movements.

TC-1.7 Intermodal Freight Villages
The County shall consider the appropriate placement of intermodal freight villages in locations within the Regional Growth Corridors.

TC-1.8 Promoting Operational Efficiency
The County shall give consideration to transportation programs that improve the operational efficiency of goods movement, especially those that enhance farm-to-market connectivity.

TC-1.11 Regionally Significant Intersections
To enhance safety and efficiency, the County shall work to limit the frequency of intersections along regionally-significant corridors.

TC-1.12 Scenic Highways and Roads
The County shall work with appropriate agencies to support the designation of scenic highways and roads in the County.

TC-1.13 Land Dedication for Roadways and Other Travel Modes As required to meet the adopted County Improvement Standards, the County shall require, where warranted, an irrevocable offer of dedication to the right-of-way for roadways and other travel modes, as part of the development review process.
12 Introduction
TC-1.14 Roadway Facilities
As part of the development review process, new development shall be conditioned to fund, through impact fees, tonnage fees, and/or other mechanism, the construction and maintenance of roadway facilities impacted by the project. As projects or locations warrant, construction or payment of prorated fees for planned road facilities may also be required as a condition of approval.

TC-1.16 County Level of Service (LOS) Standards
The County shall strive to develop and manage its roadway system (both segments and intersections) to meet a LOS of “D” or better in accordance with the LOS definitions established by the Highway Capacity Manual.

City of Dinuba General Plan
The purpose of the Circulation Element of the City of Dinuba General Plan is to guide the continued development and improvement of the circulation system to support existing and planned development in the City of Dinuba and to establish acceptable roadway service levels and identify improvements required to maintain the service levels.

The City of Dinuba General Plan contains the following Objectives and Policies related to the proposed project:

2.1 Roadway Classification, Standards
Objective A. Develop a circulation network of local roads, collectors, arterials that will meet projected traffic needs.

Objective B. Maintain a roadway level of service (LOS) of C or better on Local, Minor Collector, Collector and Arterial streets.
• Policy 2.1 All street and roadway improvements shall be in conformance with the Circulation Plan contained in the General Plan Map (reference map pocket). • Policy 2.5 The design of arterials, collectors, minor collectors, and local streets shall comply with the Standard Drawings and Specifications Manual of the City of Dinuba, as amended.

Arterials
• Policy 2.8 Alta and El Monte shall be developed with a minimum right-of-way of between 104’- 119’, to include four travel lanes, parking and/or bicycle lanes, and a two-way left center turn lane or landscaped median. Where widening these two arterials is neither feasible or practical, the right or way shall remain 96 feet. Other arterials (Kamm, Crawford, Nebraska, Road 72, Road 64 and Road 96) shall be developed with a minimum right-of-way of 104 feet, to include four travel lanes, parking, and a two-way left center turn lane or landscaped median. Reference Figure 2-3 of City 13 Introduction
of Dinuba General Plan.
• Policy 2.9 The primary purpose of arterials is to carry traffic. Parking should be prohibited on new arterials and discouraged along existing arterials as deemed appropriate by the City Council and as traffic safety conditions warrant.
• Policy 2.10 Arterials shall be built in areas where traffic demand warrants the development of this facility to meet the adopted level of service standard. • Policy 2.11 Arterial streets shall be built at a typical separation of one (1) mile. Major arterials shall be provided at two mile intervals.

Collectors
• Policy 2.12 Collectors are to be designed with an 80-94 foot right-of-way width which allows four individual travel lanes of traffic, or two lanes with a two-way left turn center lane. Minor collectors may be developed with a 58-foot right-of-way to include two travel lanes, a two-way left turn center lane, and parking. (Reference Figure 2-3 of City of Dinuba General Plan). • Policy 2.13 Collector streets shall be at approximately one-mile intervals centered between arterial streets and shall be planned to intersect with other streets so as to maximize traffic safety and discourage fast flowing-traffic through residential areas. Where possible, major arterials, minor arterials, and collectors shall form 4 leg, right angle intersections; jog, offset and skewed intersections of streets in near proximity shall be avoided where possible. • Policy 2.14 Minor collectors shall serve residential neighborhoods and provide for circulation between adjacent neighborhoods, but shall not be used to carry through traffic or high traffic volumes. Actual design and improvement to ultimate standards shall be achieved through development of small facilities by developers as areas adjoining the designated circulation system are developed, with allowance for bicycle lanes, where planned.

Other Street Standards
• Policy 2.15 Local residential street right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60 (36’ minimum curb to curb) feet which allows two travel lanes, parking, a parkway strip (7’ wide), and sidewalk (4.5’ wide).
• Policy 2.16 Arterial, collector and local street standards shall be developed which provide adequate capacity for their appropriate function, and these shall be incorporated into the City’s Standard Drawings and Specifications Manual. Half streets shall not be permitted. • Policy 2.17 Local streets shall not carry an unreasonable level of through traffic. If it is determined that a local street is carrying an unacceptable level of through traffic, the City may use appropriate means to reduce traffic through creation of one way traffic flow, installation of traffic calming devices, and/or any other means deemed to be acceptable under the Vehicle Code of the State of California. Traffic calming features in conformance with Table 2-1 (see City of Dinuba General Plan) are encouraged.
• Policy 2.18 The General Plan Circulation Plan shows the street system consisting of arterials and collectors. Designated arterials and collectors are as follows:
• Policy 2.19 Median breaks and driveway standards for arterial, collector and local streets directly 14 Introduction
affect the performance of these roadways, and the following minimum standards have been developed to facilitate the proper operation of these roadways:

Arterial Street Standards
a. Driveway access to major activity centers should be located no closer than 200 feet to the adjacent intersection of a collector or arterial street. (Measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If driveways must be provided near intersections for facilities (such as service stations) these driveways shall not be serviced by median breaks and shall be located no less than 50 feet from the intersection (measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If more than one driveway is required to serve a property, the driveways shall be separated by 50 feet (The 50 feet is to be measured edge to edge, not centerline to centerline).
b. The distance between driveways along commercially developed arterials should not be less than 400 feet (measurement shall be from centerline to centerline). Where this spacing is not practical, the development shall provide acceptable traffic mitigation measures in addition to those already required.
c. Where practical and desirable, driveways should be located on adjacent collector streets rather than on arterial streets.
d. Driveway consolidation shall be encouraged through joint access agreements along arterials where standards a. through e. are exceeded.
e. Full median breaks, where there is no adopted design, should provide access to collector streets and to major activity centers and should not be less than 200 feet from an adjacent intersection of an arterial or collector street, and not less than 1,000 feet between full median breaks on major arterials.
f. Arterial streets shall include landscaping in accordance with Figure 2-3 (See City of Dinuba General Plan .

Collector Street Standards
a. Driveway access to major activity centers should be located no closer than 150 feet to the adjacent intersection of a collector or arterial street (measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). If driveways must be provided near intersections for facilities (such as service stations) these driveways shall not be serviced by median breaks and shall be located no less than 50 feet from the intersection (measurement shall be from the curb return to the edge of the driveway). If more than one is requested to serve a property, the driveways shall be separated by 50 feet, measured edge to edge, not centerline to centerline. b. The distance between driveways and intersecting local streets should not be less than 300 feet. (Measurement shall be from the curb return to the nearest edge of the driveway). Where this spacing is not practical, the development shall provide acceptable traffic mitigation measures in addition to those already required.
c. Driveways to residential property along collectors should be consolidated whenever possible. d. Concrete medians shall be provided on collectors where left turn control is needed and by 15 Introduction
painted medians on two way left turn pockets where appropriate. Where concrete medians are provided, median breaks should be spaced not less than 300 feet apart. e. Collectors shall include landscaping in conformance with Figure 2-3 (See City of Dinuba General Plan).
• Policy 2.20 The street network should provide a quick and effi cient route for emergency vehicles, including police, fire and other vehicles, when responding to calls for service. The length of single entry access routes shall be restricted.
• Policy 2.21 Standards for new street development can be altered or refined through the specific plan or planned unit development process where it can be demonstrated that projected traffic flows can be accommodated.
• Policy 2.23 City policy is to continue to provide a high level of service to the community. Therefore, the City designates Service Level “C” (ADT) as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council) as the minimum desirable service level at which arterial and collector streets should operate. All new facilities in these categories shall be designed to operate at this level or better for a period of at least 20 years following their construction. Level of Service “D” (peak hours) shall be deemed acceptable for those road segments and intersections which have been identified as already operating at that level.
• Policy 2.24 Traffic studies should be required, when necessary, to determine mitigation measures necessary to mitigate traffic impacts.
• Policy 2.25 Intersection improvements should be made to the existing major street system selectively through traffic engineering solutions rather than major structural improvements. This could include signalization, intersection channelization, use of directional signs, and diversion of traffic onto underutilized streets, or through sequential traffic signal timing. • Policy 2.26 City circulation system street alignments shall be coordinated with Tulare County circulation system street alignments.
• Policy 2.27 In order to promote safe and efficient traffic flow throughout the City, traffic signals shall be spaced no closer than 1/4 mile on arterials except in unusual circumstances. The intersections of arterial and collector streets and the access driveways to major traffic generators shall be located so as to maintain this minimum spacing.
• Policy 2.29 Promote the improvement of El Monte Way (Avenue 416) as the primary transportation access to the City from Highway 99. To this end, the City will cooperate with Tulare County, Fresno County, and CalTrans to prepare plan lines and secure funding for right-of-way, additional lanes, signalization, and streetscape improvements.
• Policy 2.30 The ultimate development of El Monte Way (Avenue 416) should include four travel lanes from Highway 99 through the City to Road 100.
• Policy 2.32 The circulation system shall be designed and developed to minimize excessive noise impacts on sensitive land uses and traffic congestion which would increase the rate of vehicle emissions. Development shall mitigate noise and emission impacts. 16 Introduction

2.2 Street Improvements
Objective. Protect rights-of-way for future street development by clearly defining the location of future rights-of-way and establishing street dedication requirements. Such methods should minimize adverse impacts on adjacent properties and avoid imposition of street improvement requirements significantly in advance of need.
• Policy 2.37 Establish official plan lines for all arterial and collector streets included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
• Policy 2.38 Official plan lines for El Monte Way, between Alta and Tulare, and for Alta Avenue, between El Monte and Vassar, should include potential abandonment or realignment of City streets which now intersect those streets at approximately a 45º angle. • Policy 2.40 Streets abutting new development shall be developed to handle bi-directional traffi c and at least one parking lane. Arterial half streets may be permitted when additional lanes are not necessary to support development. Half collector and local streets shall not be permitted.

2.4 Traffic Safety
Objective. Maximize the use of site planning techniques to improve traffic safety. • Policy 2.47 Provide left hand-turn lanes where necessary for access from arterials into high traffic commercial or multifamily developments.
• Policy 2.48 Project designs shall reflect options for reducing through traffic on local streets. • Policy 2.49 Promote design standards which allow for safe and efficient transport, delivery, loading and unloading of goods from service vehicles within commercial and industrial areas.

2.5 Alternative Transportation Modes
Objective. Promote the use of alternative modes of transportation • Policy 2.59 Provide reasonable accommodations for comfort and convenience for riders at major transit destinations so people can utilize the transit system safely and comfortably. The City shall determine such need based on site plan review procedure and other planning implementation methods.
• Policy 2.60 Major arterials, arterials, and collectors will be designed to allow transit vehicles to pull out of traffic. This policy may be implemented with either a continuous parking lane with bus stops, or with special bus pull out lanes.
• Policy 2.62 Encourage transit alternatives to meet the basic transportation needs of the young, the elderly, the handicapped, and individuals without access to an automobile.

2.6 Bicycle Facilities
Objective. Encourage the use of bicycles as a viable means of transportation. 17 Introduction
• Policy 2.65 The City will develop, through various funding mechanisms and sources, a city-wide bicycle/pedestrian path system. The bicycle/pedestrian path system will utilize existing or future railroad right-of-way and water courses such as Traver Creek. The path, which would be between 8 and 12 feet wide and off the roadway, could also include landscaping, lighting, mileage markers and directional signage and benches. Reference Figure 2-4 (See City of Dinuba General Plan) for the proposed bicycle/pedestrian city-wide path system.
• Policy 2.66 The City of Dinuba will work with the City of Reedley to connect the city-wide bicycle/ pedestrian trail system with a similar path system in Reedley. • Policy 2.67 Provide bikeway signage for Regional Bike Routes.

2.7 Pedestrian Facilities
Objective. Provide a safe walking environment for pedestrians. • Policy 2.70 Sidewalks, paths, and appropriate crosswalks should be located to facilitate access to all schools and other areas with significant pedestrian traffic. Whenever feasible, pedestrian paths should be developed to allow for unobstructed pedestrian flow from within a neighborhood. • Policy 2.71 Sidewalks shall be required in all areas of the community to accommodate pedestrian traffic, especially along routes with high pedestrian traffic such as schools, parks, and the Downtown area. Installation of these improvements shall be encouraged to the extent feasible in existing neighborhoods where they do not currently exist.
• Policy 2.73 Street lighting shall be provided for all public streets. • Policy 2.74 Pedestrian signals should be provided at all traffic signal locations. • Policy 2.75 Adequate sidewalk and park strip maintenance should be assured. Owners of abutting property shall be responsible for maintenance of sidewalks and park strips. City shall work to assist property owners, where possible.

2.11 Transportation System and Congestion Management
Objective A. Encourage the development of strategies for maximizing the efficiency of the existing street system.

Objective B. Promote a variety of public transit connections with other nearby cities and locations. • Policy 2.84 The City shall encourage the use of energy efficient and non polluting fuels and modes of transportation.
• Policy 2.85 Transportation System Management and Transportation Demand Management strategy should be used to mitigate traffic and parking congestion. Public transit, traffic management, ridesharing and parking management are to be used to the greatest extent practicable to implement transportation management strategies.
18 Introduction

2.13 Truck Routes and Truck Parking
Objective. Provide safe and efficient truck routes into and within the community. • Policy 2.93 Truck traffic shall be permitted on the designated arterials and collector streets only; as identified in the Circulation Element Truck Route Map (reference Figure 2-5 of City of Dinuba General Plan).
• Policy 2.94 Truck parking
a. Shall be discouraged on arterial/collector streets outside of the industrial park. b. Shall be prohibited in residential areas for vehicles in excess of 10,000 gross vehicle weight (GVW), or higher than 8 feet.
• Policy 2.95 The City shall encourage development of a truck terminal and parking facilities within the industrial park.
19 2. Existing Conditions
20 21
Existing Conditions
Introduction
Figure 2-1. Aerial View of W. El Monte Ave/Road 56 Intersection.; Source: Google Earth
Introduction
The City of Dinuba Roundabout Feasibility Study involves four existing intersections which serve as entrances into the City of Dinuba. This section will discuss the existing conditions of each intersection and the surrounding properties. The following will be included as part of this discussion:
• Street classification and ROW
• Existing and projected traffic volumes and LOS
• Collision History
• Existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
Traffic counts were provided by Metro Traffic Data Inc. Collision records for all four intersections were obtained via the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

W. El Monte & Road 56
The intersection of W. El Monte Avenue and Road 56 is located within the City of Dinuba Sphere of Influence, approximately 0.5 miles west of the City of Dinuba city limit. W. El Monte Road and Road 56 are both classified as arterial streets under the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 133’ on the west leg, 137’ on the east leg, and 80’ on the north and south legs.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural land uses with one residence located on the southwest corner.

There are no existing sidewalks, crosswalks, bicycle lanes or other pedestrian/cyclist infrastructure. Traffic counts for this intersection were not available at the time of the study due to the study’s coincidence with the COVID-19 pandemic.
22 Figure 2-2. W. El Monte Ave/Road 56
Intersection Location.

El Monte Ave
Road 56
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
Introduction
A total of 14 collisions occurred at the El Monte/Road 56 between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. Of these, five accidents caused injuries and nine were property damage only (PDO). As shown in Table 1, The primary collision factor for these collisions is varied, but the most common collision factor is “unsafe speed.”
Table 1. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 56
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
2 Not Driver Hit Object PDO
3 Starting/Backing Hit Object PDO
4 Wrong Side Head-On Injury
5 Unknown Sideswipe PDO
6 Lane Change Rear End PDO
7 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
8 Lane Change Side Swipe PDO
9 Stop Sign Broadside Injury
10 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
11 Unsafe Speed Head-On Injury
12 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
13 Stop Sign Broadside Injury
14 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
E. El Monte & Road 92
The intersection of W. El Monte Avenue and Road 92 is located along the eastern city limit of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-5). El Monte Road is listed as an arterial street and Road 92 is listed as a collector street in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 50’ on the north leg, 42’ on the south leg, 112’ on the west leg, and 115’ on the east leg.

Commercial uses are located on the northeast and southeast corners of this intersection, while agricultural land uses are located on the northwest and southwest corners. Sidewalks are present along the southwest corner to provide pedestrian connectivity to the south and east. A brief segment of sidewalk exists on northeast corner along the curb return, however it does not connect to sidewalk to the east or north. Class II Bicycle lanes are present east of the intersection along El Monte Road. 23 Existing Conditions
Traffic Counts were collected on March 12,
2020. As shown in Figure 2-3, the vast majority of
users traveling through the intersection are driving
eastbound and westbound on El Monte, with few
vehicles turning north or south onto Road 92 22and
few vehicles turning from Road 92 onto El Monte.

The traffic counts also confirmed that there is very
little bicycle or pedestrian traffic at this intersection.

Two cyclists were recorded at the intersection
between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and one was
recorded between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. No
pedestrians were recorded between 7:00 AM
and 9:00 AM and one was recorded between
4:00 PM and 6:00 PM.

Figure 2-3. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at El Monte & Road 92; Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

Figure 2-5. W. El Monte Ave/Road 92
Intersection Location.

Figure 2-4. Aerial View of E. El Monte Ave/Road 92 Intersection; Source: Google Earth
El Monte Ave
Road 92
24 Four collisions occurred between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018 at the intersection of El Monte and Road 92. Of these, one was fatal, one resulted in injury, and two were property damage only. Two of these collisions were due to improper turn, one was due to unsafe speed, and one was attributed to R-O-W Auto.

Table 2. Collision History for W. El Monte & Road 92
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 R-O-W Auto Broadside Fatal
2 Unsafe Speed Hit Object PDO
3 Improper Turn Overturned PDO
4 Improper Turn Hit Object Injury
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
25 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue is located at the northern end of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-7). Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue are both designated as arterial streets in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. The existing ROW leading up to the intersection is 80’ on the north and south legs, 55’ on the west leg, and 60’ on the east leg.

The intersection is bordered by vacant land on the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners. There is one existing driveway approach and structure on the northeast corner. The intersection offers crosswalks across all legs of the intersection, however pavement markings to delineate crosswalks are significantly faded.

There are no sidewalks, bike lanes, or other bicycle/pedestrian features.

Figure 2-7. Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection
Location.

Figure 2-6. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Nebraska Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Nebraska Ave
Alta Ave
Traffic Counts were collected on October 30, Introduction 2018. As shown in Figure 2-8, the vast majority of
users traveling through the intersection are driving
north or south on Alta Avenue. The traffic counts
found that many users are driving eastbound and
westbound on Nebraska Avenue. The traffic counts
reported few drivers turning from Alta Avenue onto
Nebraska Avenue or from Nebraska Avenue onto
Alta Avenue.

The traffic counts also confirmed that there is very
little bicycle or pedestrian traffic at this intersection.

Eight cyclists and eight pedestrians were recorded
at the intersection on the day of the traffic count.

Figure 2-8. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue. Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
26 Three collisions occurred at the intersection of Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue between January 1, 2014 and December 31st, 2018. All three of these collisions resulted in injuries. Stop sign/signal and driver alcohol/drug were cited as the primary collision factors for two of these collisions. The primary collision factor was not stated for the third collision.

Table 3. Collision History for Alta Ave and Nebraska Avenue Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Driver Alcohol/Drug Auto/Pedestrian Injury
2 Not Stated Broadside Injury
3 Stop Sign/Signal Broadside Injury
Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue is located in the southern portion of the City of Dinuba (see Figure 2-10). Kamm Avenue and Alta Avenue are both designated as arterial streets in the City of Dinuba General Plan Circulation Element. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 105’ on the north leg, 100’ on the south leg, 50’ on the west leg, and 96’ on the east leg.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural and vacant land uses on all sides. A High School is planned on the south-west corner of the intersection, which will significantly increase traffic flow upon development.

The intersection offers crosswalks for pedestrians across the southern leg of Alta Avenue and eastern leg of Kamm Avenue. Sidewalks are present along the southeast corner to provide pedestrian connectivity to the south and east. Brief segments of sidewalk are also present along the curb returns of the northeast and southwest corners. Class II Bicycle lanes are present along the north and south legs of Alta Avenue and east of the intersection along Kamm Avenue.

Figure 2-10. Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection
Location.

Figure 2-9. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Kamm Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Kamm Ave
Alta Ave
City of Dinuba
Existing Conditions
27 Traffic Counts were collected on March 12, 2020. As
shown in Figure 2-11, the majority of users traveling through the intersection are driving north or south on Alta Avenue.

The traffic counts also reported many drivers turning right to go north onto Alta Avenue from Kamm Avenue and
many drivers turning left to go east onto Kamm Avenue
from Alta Avenue. A new high school is planned for the
southwest corner of the intersection. As such, bicycle and pedestrian is expected to be significant.

Two collisions occurred at the intersection of Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue between January 1, 2014 and
December 31, 2018. Both of these collisions resulted in injuries. Improper turn was cited as the primary collision factor for one of the collisions, however the primary
collision factor was not stated for the other.

Figure 2-11. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue &
Kamm Avenue. Source: Metro Traffic Data Inc.

Table 4. Collision History for Alta Ave and Kamm Avenue Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Not Stated Not Stated Injury
2 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
Alta Avenue & Avenue 400
The intersection of Alta Avenue and Avenue 400 (SR 201) is located approximately 0.75 miles south of the in the Dinuba City Limit (see Figure 2-13). Alta Avenue is designated as an arterial street by the City of Dinuba General Plan. The segment of Alta Avenue leading up to this intersection is located in unincorporated Tulare County and is designated as a minor arterial by the Tualre County General Plan.

Avenue 400 (SR) is a Caltrans route and is designated as a major collector in the Tulare County General Plan. Leading up to the intersection, the existing ROW is 140’ on the north and south legs and 65’ on the east and west legs.

The intersection is bordered by agricultural and vacant land uses on all sides. The intersection does not offer crosswalks or sidewalks and there is signage to indicate that pedestrian crossing is not allowed at this intersection. Class II Bicycle lanes are present on the north and south legs of the intersection along Alta Avenue.

Existing Conditions
28 Figure 2-13. Alta Ave/Avenue 400
Intersection Location.

Figure 2-12. Aerial View of Alta Ave/Avenue 400 Intersection; Source: Google Earth
Avenue 400
Alta Ave
Traffic Counts were collected on May 17, 2017. As
shown in Figure 2-13, the majority of users traveling
through the intersection are driving north or south
on Alta Avenue. The traffic counts also reported
many drivers traveling through the intersection on
Avenue 400.

Eleven collisions occurred at the intersection of
Alta Avenue and Avenue 400 between January
1, 2014 and December 31, 2018. The primary
collision factor for a majority of these collisions
was unsafe speed and more than half resulted in
an injury.

Figure 2-14. Peak Hour Traffic Counts at Alta Avenue &
Avenue 400. Source: National Data & Surveying Services
Table 5. Collision History for Alta Ave & Avenue 400
Primary Collision Factor Collision Type Severity
1 Improper Turn Hit Object PDO
2 Driver Alcohol/Drug Hit Object Injury
3 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
4 Unsafe Speed Rear End Injury
5 Unsafe Speed Sideswipe PDO
6 Unsafe Speed Hit Object PDO
7 Driver Alcohol/Drug Broadside Injury
8 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
9 R-O-W Auto Head-On Injury
10 Unsafe Speed Rear End PDO
11 Improper Turn Hit Object Injury
City of Dinuba

3. Roundabout Design Principles
29 30
Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
31 Introduction
Thoughtful roundabout design is essential in ensuring that a roundabout can adequately serve traffic demand, accommodate the range of users, and is appropriate for a given area. Features incorporated into roundabouts can determine what types of vehicles will be able to use the roundabout, the speed at which vehicles use the roundabout, and the comfort/safety of pedestrians and cyclists using the roundabout. At its core, roundabout design involves balancing the competing factors of operational efficiency and user safety to achieve the following key objectives:
• Slow entry speeds
• The appropriate number of lanes
• Smooth channelization
• Adequate accommodation for design vehicles
• A design that meets the needs of pedestrians and cyclists • Appropriate sight distance and visibility
This section will provide an overview of roundabout design principles and discuss the elements that guided the development of the five roundabouts discussed in this Study.

Guidance Documents
Guidelines from several documents were referenced while developing the proposed roundabout designs.

These documents vary in their level of technical detail, however each provided essential information to guide the development of roundabout designs.

Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2010 NCHRP Report 672): NCHRP Report 672 was an update the the FHWA’s Roundabouts: An Informational Guide and provides a comprehensive guide to roundabout planning and design. This guide includes information on the design, use, signage, operation, and maintenance of roundabouts and discusses how the type of user should influence roundabout design.

California MUTCD 2014 Edition: The California MUTCD was last updated in 2014 by the Federal Highway Administration and provides detailed information on signage and markings for roundabout intersections. These guidelines were used to select appropriate signage and markings for the proposed roundabouts in the City of Dinuba.

Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility (2002): The Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide was published by the FHWA in 2002 and provides information on ensuring pedestrian and cyclist connectivity throughout a roundabout design. The guide also discusses roundabout accessibility for persons with disabilities.

Figure 3-1. Single-lane roundabout.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
32 Benefits of Roundabout Intersections
Safety
Several studies have shown that roundabouts are much safer than traditional intersections. According to studies by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the Federal Highway Administration, roundabouts typically provide the following safety benefits to intersections where stop signs or signals were previously used for traffic control:
• A 37 percent reduction in overall collisions
• A 75 percent reduction in injury collisions
• A 90 percent reduction in fatality collisions
• A 40 percent reduction in pedestrian collisions
These safety benefits are due to the design and
geometry of roundabout intersections. Unlike
traditional intersections, which require drivers to cross perpendicular to the flow of conflicting traffic, drivers enter a roundabout at a congruous angle that all but
eliminates T-bone and head on collisions. These are
two of the most severe collisions as they are much
more likely to result in injuries and fatalities. The curved, yield-controlled entry also serves to reduce traffic
speeds for vehicles entering the roundabout, which
reduces the occurrence and severity of collisions.

Additionally, roundabouts have fewer conflict points. A conflict point is any point where the paths of two through or turning vehicles diverge, merge, or cross and where a collision can occur. As shown in Figure 3-3, there are 32 conflict points associated with a traditional intersection while there are only 8 conflict points at an equivalent roundabout.

Figure 3-2. Roundabout safety features. Source: FHWA
Figure 3-3. Conflict points at roundabouts vs. traditional intersections.

Roundabout Design Principles
33 Traffic Flow
Research shows that roundabouts reduce traffic congestion by moving cars through an intersection more quickly than a traditional intersection. This is because roundabouts are yield-controlled intersections, meaning that traffic is not required to stop at the intersection if the roundabout is empty.

Although it may seem counterintuitive, the ability of a roundabout to slow traffic speeds actually increases the rate at which cars are able to move through the intersection because the capacity of a roundabout is greater when the speed of circulating traffic is lower. A yield-controlled intersection requires drivers to look for gaps in the traffic flow in order to enter the circulating lane. When circulating traffic flow is faster, gaps must be wider for a driver to comfortably enter. This results in fewer opportunities for drivers to enter the circulating lane. Roundabouts that effectively slow traffic create more opportunities for drivers to enter the circulating lane because the gaps in circulating traffic can be narrower.

Operation and Maintenance Costs
Roundabouts offer significant long-term cost benefits over traditional signalized intersections. Roundabouts are generally cheaper to operate because they do not require the hardware, maintenance and electrical costs associated with traffic signals, which can cost between $5,000 and $10,000 per year. Additionally, the service life of a roundabout is approximately 25 years, while the service life of a typical traffic signal is approximately 10 years.

It should be noted that initial construction costs may be higher for roundabouts than traditional signalized intersections in areas where Right-of-Way acquisition costs are high and existing Right-of-Way is not available at the road junction. Additionally, landscaping costs can be higher depending on the landscaping of the central island and splitter islands.

Figure 3-4. Vehicles waiting to enter roundabout.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
34 Types of Circular Intersection
A roundabout is a type of circular intersection in which traffic is permitted to flow in one direction around a central island. In addition to roundabouts, there are three other types of circular intersections. These are listed and defined below. These definitions are provided by the NCHRP Roundabouts: An Informational Guide.

Rotaries: An old-style circular intersection common to the United States prior to the 1960s, are characterized by a large diameter [often greater than 300 ft (100 m)]. The diameter of a rotary is primarily a consequence of the length of the weaving section required between intersection legs. Unlike the modern roundabout, lane changes are typically required within a rotary for some movements. In addition, some rotaries operate with circulating traffic yielding to entering traffic, which can create congestion on the circulatory roadway. Circulating speeds are high due to the large diameter, making maneuvers within the circle more challenging. An example of a Rotary intersection is provided in Figure 3-5)
Signalized Traffic Circles: An old-style circular intersection used in some cities in the United States where traffic signals are used to control one or more entry–circulating point. As a result, signalized traffic circles have distinctly different operational characteristics from yield controlled roundabouts, with queue storage within the circulatory roadway and progression of signals required. Signalized traffic circles are distinct from roundabouts with pedestrian signals, as the entry–circulating point at a roundabout is still governed by a yield sign. An example of a signalized traffic circle is provided in Figure 3-6) Neighborhood Traffic Circles: Circular intersections that are typically built at the intersections of local streets for reasons of traffic calming and/or aesthetics. The intersection approaches may be uncontrolled or stop-controlled. They do not typically include raised channelization to guide the approaching driver onto the circulatory roadway. At some traffic circles, left-turning movements for larger vehicles are allowed to occur in front of the central island, potentially conflicting with other circulating traffic. Exhibit 1-5 shows examples of typical neighborhood traffic circles. The example in Portland, Oregon, is an allway stop-controlled intersection; the example in Seattle, Washington, is uncontrolled. An example of a neighborhood traffic signal is provided in Figure 3-7).

Figure 3-5. Example of rotary intersection.

Figure 3-6. Signalized roundabout in United Kingdom.

Figure 3-7. Example of neighborhood traffic circle.

Roundabout Design Principles
Introduction
35 Introduction Modern Roundabouts: Roundabouts are the fourth subset of circular intersections with specific design and traffic control features. These features include yield control of all entering traffic, channelized approaches, and geometric curvature and features to induce desired vehicular speed levels. There are three types of roundabouts discussed in the NCHRP publication Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. These are miniroundabouts, single-lane roundabouts, and multilane roundabouts. An example of each of these is shown in Figures 3-8 through 3-9. Due to the location of the proposed roundabout sites, this Feasibility Study will focus on Single-lane and multilane roundabouts.

Single-Lane Roundabouts
Single Lane Roundabouts have a single-lane of entry at
all legs and one circulatory lane around the central island.

Their design typically includes raised splitter islands, a nontransversable central island, crosswalks, and a truck apron.

Single-lane roundabouts are designed for low-speed
operation and offer the greatest level of safety for users.

Traffic speeds on single-lane roundabouts is slower
than on multilane roundabouts, which creates a more
comfortable atmosphere for cyclists and pedestrians
using the intersection. Additionally, pedestrians only need to cross one lane of traffic at a time. For drivers, singlelane roundabouts have fewer conflict points than multilane roundabouts and drivers have no lane use decisions to
make.

Multilane roundabouts
Multilane roundabouts have at least one entry with two or more lanes, and can also include roundabouts with entries on one or more approaches that flare from one to two or more lanes. The number of circulatory lanes is based upon approach lane configurations. Vehicular speeds at the entry, on the circulatory roadway, and at the exit may be slightly higher than those for the single-lane roundabouts due to the increased roadway width. Multilane roundabouts
also have more conflict points and require pedestrians to cross two lanes of traffic, making multilane roundabouts slightly less safe than single-lane roundabouts. Multilane roundabout design typically includes raised splitter islands, a non-transversable central island, a truck apron, and
appropriate entry path deflection.

Figure 3-8. Single-lane roundabout
Figure 3-9. Multilane roundabout
Roundabout Design Principles
36 Key Roundabout Features
Central Island
The main distinguishing feature of a roundabout intersection is a raised central island around which traffic flows. Central Islands control the direction of traffic and can act as an aesthetic feature. The size of central islands can vary depending on the desired speed of traffic flow. As shown in Figures 3-10 and 3-11, central islands can vary significantly in shape and size depending on the intersection’s location and context.

Figure 3-10. Oval central island. Figure 3-11. Peanut-shaped central island.

Splitter Island
A splitter island is a raised, triangle-shaped island located between entering and exiting vehicles at each two-way leg of a roundabout. Splitter islands are used to direct and slow entering and exiting traffic speeds and reduce pedestrian crossing distance by allowing pedestrians to cross one direction of traffic at a time.

Circulatory Roadway
Like the central island, the circulatory roadway is a key distinguishing feature of a roundabout intersection.

The circulatory roadway is the curved path used by vehicles to travel in a counterclockwise fashion around the central island. The radius of the central island and circulatory roadway is a key component in determining traffic speeds within the roundabout.

Entrance Line
The entrance line marks the point of entry into the
circulatory roadway. Entering vehicles must yield to
any circulating traffic before crossing this line into the circulatory roadway.

Figure 3-12. Single-lane roundabout
Roundabout Design Principles
37 Figure 3-13. Roundabout design features. Source: FHWA Roundabout Design Principles
Accessible Pedestrian Crossings
Pedestrian crossings should be provided at least 20 feet from the entrance line to give room for the vehicle to stop prior to the crosswalk but outside of the circulatory roadway. The crossing typically cuts through the splitter island at grade to allow pedestrians, wheelchairs, strollers, and bicycles to pass through. The pedestrian crossings must be accessible with detectable warnings and appropriate slopes in accordance with ADA requirements. Considerations for persons with disabilities are discussed further on page 41.

Truck Apron
A truck apron is a transversable portion of the central island adjacent to the circulatory roadway that may be needed to accommodate the wheel tracking of large vehicles. When
a large vehicle enters a turn, the rear wheels take a shorter path around the curve (see Figure 3-16). A truck apron is a raised section of concrete that helps to accommodate this off-tracking by acting as an extra lane. The back wheels of the large vehicle can ride up on the truck apron so the truck can complete the turn, while the raised portion of concrete discourages use by smaller vehicles.

Figure 3-16. Large vehicle wheel tracking.

Figure 3-14. Accessible Pedestrian Crossing
Figure 3-15. Large truck using truck apron on roundabout. 38 Roundabout Design Principles
Planning-Level Sizing and Space Requirements
Roundabout Sizing
The number of lanes a roundabout should have is determined based on existing and projected traffic volumes. The graph below provides a method for determining the number of lanes in a roundabout based on AADT and left-turn rates. This graph is only applicable at intersections where the ratio of peak-hour to daily traffic (K) is between 0.09-0.10, the direction distribution of traffic (D) is between 0.52-0.58, the ratio of minor street to total entering traffic is between 0.33-0.50, and the acceptable volume-to-capacity ratio is between 0.85-1.00.

Figure 3-17. Roundabout sizing graph. Source: NCHRP (2010) 39 Roundabout Design Principles
Table 6. Volume Thresholds for Determining the Number of Entry Lanes Required Volume Range (Ve+ Vc) Number of Lanes Required
0 - 1,000 vehicles/hour Single-lane entry likely to be sufficient 1,000 - 1,300 vehicles/hour Single-lane entry may be sufficient based upon more detailed analysis. Two-lane entry may be needed.
1,300 - 1,800 vehicles/hour Two-lane entry likely to be sufficient More than 1,8000 vehicles/hour More than two entering lanes may be required. A more detailed capacity evaluation should be conducted to verify lane numbers and arrangements.

User Considerations
Trucks
Roundabouts should be designed to accommodate the largest vehicles that will use the intersection. El Monte Avenue and Alta Avenue are both identified as Truck Routes by the City of Dinuba General Plan.

Therefore, it is critical that the roundabouts are designed to accommodate large trucks.

While roundabouts are typically designed to reduce traffic speeds (tight turning radii and narrow curbto-curb widths), designers must ensure that large vehicle drivers have the basic ability to travel through the intersection in areas where large trucks are present. Implementation of a truck apron can be helpful in accommodating the rear wheel tracking of large vehicles.

One potential obstacle to the effective use of truck aprons is lack of public knowledge. Many truck drivers do not realize that they are allowed to ride up onto the apron and that it is there specifically for that purpose.

Outreach to truck drivers is needed to ensure the apron will be used to effectively accommodate large vehicles.

Entry Sizing
The sum of entering (Ve) and conflicting (Vc) traffic
volumes (see Figure 3-17), can be used to evaluate
the number of lanes required at each entry. Table 6,
summarizes the number of lanes needed at each entry
based on the sum of these variables.

Figure 3-18. Entry sizing variables.
40 Roundabout Design Principles
Cyclists
Bicycle lanes are not recommended within the circulatory roadway of roundabouts because they have been shown to have negative impacts on cyclist safety. When bicycle lanes or shoulders are present on roads approaching the intersection, they should be terminated in advance of the roundabout.

Cyclists have the option to merge with traffic and travel through the roundabout as a “driver,” via the roundabout’s vehicular travel lanes, or exit the roadway onto the sidewalk and travel through the intersection as a “pedestrian.” In areas where higher vehicle travel speeds and/or traffic volumes are present, it is likely that more cyclists will choose to exit the roadway and use the roundabout’s sidewalks/crosswalks to move through the intersection. A bicycle ramp to facilitate movements from the bicycle lane/shoulder to the sidewalk should be provided at these locations.

Pedestrians
Roundabouts are generally safer for pedestrians than traditional intersections because traffic speeds are lower, crossing distances are shorter, and splitter islands permit pedestrians to only cross one direction of traffic at a time. Roundabouts should facilitate pedestrian connectivity by providing sidewalks on approaches and crosswalks at each leg of travel. Crosswalks should set back from the yield line by at least one car length. This allows an approaching driver to devote their attention to the crossing pedestrian while waiting for the driver ahead to enter the circulatory roadway. Additionally, this provides a shorter crossing distance when compared to a crossing directly adjacent to the circulatory roadway.

Visually Impaired
Unlike traditional stop or signal controlled intersections, yield controlled intersections require pedestrians to make decisions based on gaps in traffic flow. This presents a unique challenge for individuals with visual disabilities who must decide not only when to cross the road, but also determine where and in which direction to cross. Accessible pedestrian signals, such as an audible message accompanied by flashing crosswalk lights or signage, can be useful in alerting drivers that a pedestrian is crossing and increase safety for the visually impaired. Truncated domes (Figure 3-19) or other tactile paving is also needed to alert visually impaired pedestrians of crossing locations.

Figure 3-19. Crosswalk lighting. Figure 3-20. Truncated dome on sidewalk ramp. 41 Roundabout Design Principles
Landscaping
Aside from guiding the direction of traffic, the central island of a roundabout usually does not serve a functional purpose and should not be transversed by motorists, pedestrians or cyclists. The land within the central island is essentially free space that can be enhanced to become an aesthetic feature.

Enhancing the visual impact of a roundabout central island is usually achieved through landscaping.

Landscaping can be as simple or elaborate as is desired. Simple landscaping options include grass or other low maintenance ground cover. More elaborate designs include flowers, ornamental landscaping, and fountains. Regardless of the type of landscaping, it is important that the design does not obstruct driver views.

The central island of a roundabout also creates the opportunity for local governments to express community values and sense of identity. Public art (usually sculptures) can be used to decorate a roundabout and create a sense of place and community engagement. Public art should be inclusive and representative of the community’s character.

Figure 3-21. Roundabout dryscaping in Arizona Figure 3-22. Elaborate roundabout landscaping in Chico, CA Figure 3-23. Example of public art in roundabout central island, Lansing, MI.

Figure 3-24. Example of public art in central island,
Sarasota, FL.
42 4. Proposed Design Concepts
43 44
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
45 Introduction
The Design Concepts discussed in this chapter were developed by 4, Creeks, Inc., TJKM, and Yamabe & Horn Engineering. The roundabout designs proposed in this section integrate the design elements discussed in Section 3 - Roundabout Design Principles while taking into account the existing conditions at each intersection. The proposed designs are intended to accommodate existing and future travel demand and were developed based on traffic count data, where available.

Figure 4-1. Proposed Design Concept Locations
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
46 W. El Monte & Road 56 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the E. El Monte & Road 56 intersection was developed by TJKM. Due to limitations related to Covid-19, traffic counts were not available for this intersection, however it was assumed that a single-lane roundabout would be sufficient to accommodate traffic based on the context and surrounding area.

The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from El Monte and single-lane entries from Road 56. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the El Monte Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Road 56 and to better conform to the existing two-lane roadway. Additionally, separating the right turns from the through movements will improve roundabout operations and prevent future delays.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection. There are no existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities and the intersection is not in an area of significant pedestrian or cyclist travel. It is not anticipated that pedestrian or cyclist use will increase in the future . Therefore, no cyclist or pedestrian facilities are proposed. However, cyclists may use the vehicular travel lanes to move through the intersection if needed.

Figure 4-2. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 56.

W. El Monte
Road 56
Proposed Design Concepts
47 E. El Monte & Road 92 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the E. El Monte & Road 92 intersection was developed by TJKM. The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from El Monte and single-lane entries from Road

92. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the El Monte Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Road

92. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection, it was determined that providing right-turn-only lanes on roadway entries with two travel lanes would better conform with the existing roadway. Additionally, separating the right turns from the heavy through movements will improve roundabout operations and help maintain acceptable operation in the future.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection. Crosswalks and sidewalks are proposed along all legs to accommodate pedestrian travel. The proposed sidewalks on the south-west corner will connect to existing sidewalk on the west side of Road 92, south of the intersection, and on the south side of El Monte, west of the intersection.

Sidewalks proposed on the north-west, north-east, and south-east corners will connect to future sidewalks along E. El Monte and Road 92 as these improvements are developed.

As discussed in Section 2, Class II bicycle facilities are present along the east and west legs of the intersection along El Monte Avenue. Bike ramps are proposed to accommodate cyclists who wish to travel through the intersection as a pedestrian. Sharrows are proposed within the circulatory roadway for cyclists wishing to move through the intersection using the vehicular travel lanes.

Figure 4-3. Proposed Design Concept for W. El Monte & Road 92.

E. El Monte
Road 92
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
48 Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue Design Concept
The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue intersection was developed by Yamabe & Horn Engineering. It was determined that a single-lane roundabout and single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection under existing and future conditions. Landscaping is proposed to reduce the travel width from the existing 80’ ROW along Alta Avenue to a single entry and exit lane. This will improve safety at the intersection by reducing traffic speeds.

Splitter islands are proposed on all four legs to slow and direct traffic. The splitter island on the southern leg was broken into three pieces in order to provide access to residences along Alta Avenue. A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks, which frequently travel through the intersection.

Sidewalks and crosswalks are proposed on all legs of the intersection to accommodate pedestrian travel.

It is proposed that the crosswalks bend as they intersect the splitter islands in order to orient pedestrians towards oncoming traffic and improve safety. The proposed sidewalks will connect future sidewalks along Alta Avenue and Nebraska Avenue as these improvements are developed. Bicycle ramps are proposed on all four legs of the intersection to facilitate bicycle movements from the roadway to the sidewalk.

Figure 4-4. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue Nebraska Ave
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
Introduction
49 Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue Design Concept Introduction The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue intersection was developed by 4-Creeks, Inc.

The design proposes a two-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from Alta Avenue and Kamm Avenue.

Drivers are directed to use the outer lane for right turns and the inner lane for through traffic and left turns. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection under existing conditions, traffic volumes are expected to significantly increase upon development of the planned high school on the southwest corner of the intersection. It was determined that a multi-lane roundabout would be best to maintain acceptable operation in the future and prevent traffic delays during peak travel periods.

A standard truck apron is proposed around the central island to accommodate large trucks. Crosswalks and sidewalks are proposed along all legs to accommodate pedestrian travel. The proposed sidewalks on the south-east corner will connect to existing sidewalk south side of Kamm Avenue, east of the intersection, and on the east side of Alta Avenue, south of the intersection. Sidewalks proposed on the south-west corner of the intersection will connect to planned sidewalk facilities upon the development of the new high school.

Sidewalks on the northeast and northwest corners will connect to future sidewalk facilities as those areas are developed in the future. A s discussed in Section 2, Class II Bicycle lanes are present along the north and south legs of Alta Avenue and east of the intersection along Kamm Avenue. Bike ramps are proposed to accommodate cyclists who wish to travel through the intersection using pedestrian facilities. Alternatively, cyclists can merge with vehicular traffic and use vehicular traffic lanes to move through the intersection.

Figure 4-5. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue Kamm Ave
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
50 Alta Avenue & Avenue 400 Design Concept
The roundabout design for the Alta Avenue & Avenue 400 intersection was developed by TJKM. The design proposes a single-lane roundabout with multi-lane entries from Alta Avenue and single-lane entries from Avenue 400. Right-turn-only lanes are proposed along the Alta Avenue legs to facilitate right turns onto Avenue 400. Although single-lane entries would have adequate capacity to serve the intersection, it was determined that providing right-turn-only lanes at entries from Alta Avenue would better conform to the existing 4-lane roadway. Additionally, it was found that while the rate of right turns is not necessarily high, the northbound and southbound through movement is high and right tun movements are higher than left turns on Alta Avenue. Separating the right turns from the heavy through movement traffic will improve roundabout operations and help to avoid future delays.

Existing culverts are located along the north side of El Monte, east of the intersection, and along the west side of Avenue 400, south of the intersection. It is proposed that the roundabout be constructed slightly west of the existing centerline along Avenue 400 in order to avoid construction in the culvert.

Figure 4-6. Proposed Design Concept for Alta Avenue & Avenue 400.

Avenue 400
Alta Ave
Proposed Design Concepts
Preliminary Landscaping Concept Plan
The proposed roundabouts are intended to act as entrances into the City of Dinuba and would be appropriate locations for decorative landscaping and welcome/monument signage. Landscaping should be similar in style to the landscaping used in the City’s medians and parks and consistent with the City of Dinuba Landscaping and Design Guidelines. It should be noted that the contents of this section are intended to guide the development of a final landscaping plan, and that a final landscaping plan should be prepared by a qualified landscape architect prior to project implementation.

Central Islands
Landscaping is proposed within the central islands of all roundabouts proposed by this study. Central islands should be landscaped with shrubs and ornamental vegetation that allow adequate sight distance for vehicles and pedestrians. Sculptures, or other public artwork, may be incorporated into the design to enhance the visual character. Plants should be selected based on their ability to provide a variety of colors and textures and spaced to fill in 80% of the central island area within two years after planting.

Groundcover coverage should be 100% in one year. A sample plant list for central island landscaping is provided below.
• Yeddo Hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis umbellata)
• Chinese Red Fringe Flower
• Privet (Ligustrum japonicum)
• Dianella (Cassa Blue or Clarity Blue)
• Fortnight Lily (Butterfly Iris)
• Asian Star Jasmine
• Lantana
• Red & Yellow Yucca
• “Flamingo Glow” Yucca/Lily (Beschorneria yuccoides)
• Agave “Blue Glow”
Welcome signs or monument signs are an effective tool to create a sense of identity in a public space, and can be incorporated into the roundabout central island landscaping plan to inform drivers of where they are and provide aesthetic benefits. “Welcome to Dinuba” monument signage is proposed at the intersections of W. El Monte & Road 56, W. El Monte & Road 92, N. Alta & Nebraska, and S. Alta & Kamm Avenue. Monument signage may be implemented at S. Alta & Avenue 400 instead of S. Alta & Kamm Avenue at the City’s discretion.

Planter Strips and Splitter Islands
Landscaping is proposed within all splitter islands wider than 8 feet and within planter strips, where applicable. Plants should be selected based on their ability to provide low maintenance, drought tolerant ground cover and should be spaced to provide 100% ground cover in 1 year. Sod should not be used within planter strips or splitter islands. Decorative hardscaping is proposed where splitter islands are less than 8 feet wide.
51 Proposed Design Concepts
Figure 4-7. Conceptual central island landscaping and monument signage.

Figure 4-8. Conceptual splitter island landscaping.
52 5. Action Plan and Implementation
53 54
Action Plan and Implementation
Introduction
55 Feasibility Study Implementation
This planning study was developed to assess the feasibility of roundabout intersections at five key locations that serve as access points to the City of Dinuba. It is intended to serve as a planning-level study to guide the development of roundabout designs at these intersections. Implementation of the Study is based on the following assumptions:
• All improvements will be consistent with the City of Dinuba General Plan, as well as all other applicable agency standards.
• Implementation of the proposed design concepts identified in this feasibility study will occur as funding sources become available. This may be in phases depending on the funding source and timing availability.
• Project funding is able to be obtained locally or through State and Federal funding sources. • Land necessary to accommodate the footprint of the proposed roundabout can be reasonably obtained through Right of Way Acquisitions.

Based on these assumptions, all five intersections involved in this study are considered to be feasible locations for roundabout intersections, and the designs provided in Section 4 - Proposed Design Concepts are appropriate to accommodate existing and future uses. This section will strategies necessary to achieve project implementation, including Right-of-Way acquisition, environmental review and compliance, and financial planning.

Action Plan and Implementation
Right of Way Acquisition
Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition is the act of acquiring land or easements to complete a project. ROW acquisitions will be required for four of the intersections prior to project implementation. The roundabout at El Monte & Road 56 is the only intersection that will not require ROW acquisition because existing ROW is sufficient to accommodate the proposed design. Land that will need to be acquired by the City prior to project implementation is shown in Figures 5-1 - Figure 5-4, and a summary of ROW acquisition requirements is provided in Table 7. It should be noted that ROW area calculations are approximate and based off of conceptual designs. Property boundary surveys and final designs will be needed to determine exact ROW acquisition requirements.
56 Figure 5-1. El Monte & Road 92 ROW Acquisition Figure 5-2. Alta & Nebraska Ave ROW Acquisition Figure 5-3. Alta & Kamm ROW Acquisition Figure 5-4. Alta & Ave 400 ROW Acquisition Action Plan and Implementation
Table 7. ROW Acquisition Summary
Intersection APN Land Use
ROW
Acquisition
(sf)
E. El Monte & Road 92 013-090-040 General Commercial 3925 013-090-055 Medium-Low Density Residential 4444
018-180-020 Medium-Low Density Residential 6701
018-180-032, 034 General Commercial 3296
N. Alta & Nebraska
Avenue
013-050-012 Medium-Low Density Residential 7937
013-100-008 Community Commercial 11481
014-071-001 Medium-Low Density Residential 6528
014-380-023 Community Commercial 14450
S. Alta & Kamm Avenue 107-172-009, 059 Light Industrial 9754 017-210-020 Community Commercial 3442
030-010-041 Light Industrial 3761
030-260-043 General Commercial 5778
S. Alta & Avenue 400 030-020-039 Professional Office 975 030-030-020 Industrial Reserve 412
57 Environmental Review and Compliance Process
It is likely that all five proposed roundabouts will require federal funding and will therefore be subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The federal agency that is providing project funding will be responsible for complying with the requirements of NEPA, while the City of Dinuba and/or Tulare County will act as Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA guidelines.

It is anticipated that the environmental impacts associated with Plan implementation will be adequately accounted for under a Finding of No Significant Impact under NEPA and a Negative Declaration under CEQA, however the final determination regarding the appropriate environmental compliance documents will be made by the federal agency carrying out the federal action and the City of Dinuba and/or Tulare County as Lead Agencies pursuant to NEPA and CEQA guidelines.

Environmental
Assessment
(EA) Notice of
Availability and
Final EIS
Finding of No
Significant Impact
(FONSI)
Draft
Environemtnal
Impact Statement
(EIS)
Record of Decision
(ROD)
Notice of
Intent (NOI)
Figure 5-5. NEPA Process
Action Plan and Implementation
Initial
Environmental
Study
Negative
Declaration /
Mitigated Negative
Declaration
(ND/MND)
Final EIR
Decision
Notice of
Preparation
(NOP)
Draft EIR
Figure 5-6. CEQA Process
Table 8. Cost Estimate Summary
Intersection Total Construction Cost
W. El Monte & Road 56 $2,111,039.98
E. El Monte & Road 92 $3,512,965.78
N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue $2,942,000.00
S. Alta & Kamm Avenue $2,625,651.88
S. Alta & Avenue 400 $2,135,507.28
Financial Plan
Because implementation of the proposed design concepts is completely dependent on the acquisition of adequate funding, cost estimates and identification of potential funding sources is necessary to ensure the practicality of this study. This section will discuss the estimated costs of proposed design concepts and identify potential funding sources to support project implementation.

Project Costs
Preliminary cost estimates for implementation of four of the proposed design concepts were developed by 4-Creeks. Cost estimates for the N. Alta & Nebraska Avenue roundabout were developed by Yamabe & Horn Engineering. These estimates should be used as a guideline for funding requests and scheduling.

It should be noted that cost estimates are based off of preliminary designs and assumed project extents (i.e. length of road reconstruction) and cost estimates may need to be updated throughout the design and approval process as more information becomes available. 58 Action Plan and Implementation
59 Table 9. El Monte & Road 56 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 258 SF $1.50 $387.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 157,197 SF $0.25 $39,299.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 605 LF $4.00 $2,420.00 10 Remove Asphalt Dike 133 LF $4.00 $532.00
11 Remove Guard Rail 189 LF $6.00 $1,134.00
12 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 8 EA $7,000.00 $56,000.00 13 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 14 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
15 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
16 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,659 LF $42.00 $153,678.00
17 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,342 LF $40.00 $53,680.00 18 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
19 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
20 Landscaping 9,533 SF $4.00 $38,132.00
21 Stamped Median Concrete 1,209 SF $15.00 $18,135.00
22 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
4,222 SF $25.00 $105,550.00
23 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 24 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
25 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
26 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,553 TON $100.00 $455,300.00
27 Class II Aggregate Base 6,937 TON $80.00 $554,960.00 Construction Subtotal $1,919,127.25
Contingency (10%) $191,912.73
Construction Total $2,111,039.98
Action Plan and Implementation
Introduction
60 Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message
Signs (PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 4,524 SF $1.50 $6,786.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 119,305 SF $0.25 $29,826.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 1,105 LF $4.00 $4,420.00 10 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 1 EA $7,000.00 $7,000.00 11 Power Pole Relocation 2 EA $25,000.00 $50,000.00
12 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 13 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
14 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
15 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,007 LF $42.00 $126,294.00
16 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,922 LF $40.00 $76,880.00 17 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
18 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
19 Landscaping 18,031 SF $4.00 $72,124.00
20 Concrete Sidewalks 16,905 SF $6.00 $101,430.00
21 Stamped Median Concrete 1,382 SF $15.00 $20,730.00
22 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
3,607 SF $25.00 $90,175.00
23 Curb Ramp 8 EA $5,500.00 $44,000.00
24 Detecable Warning Surfaces 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00
25 Bike Ramp 4 EA $3,700.00 $14,800.00
26 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 27 RFB Beacons 1 LS $220,000.00 $220,000.00
28 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
29 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
30 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,944 TON $100.00 $494,400.00
Action Plan and Implementation
Table 10. El Monte & Road 92 Cost Estimate Continued
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
31 Class II Aggregate Base 7,446 TON $80.00 $595,680.00 32 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 18,366 SF $40.00 $734,640.00 Construction Subtotal $3,193,605.25
Contingency (10%) $319,360.53
Construction Total $3,512,965.78
Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Traffic and Dust Control 1 LS $75,000.00 $75,000.00
3 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000.00
4 Asphalt Concrete Grinding 82,392 SF $0.25 $20,598.00
5 Roadway Excavation 3,560 CY $40.00 $142,400.00
6 Hot Mix Asphalt, Type 'A' 2,401 TON $120.00 $288,120.00 7 Aggregate Base, CL II 4,332 TON $35.00 $151,620.00
8 Construct Concrete Median Curb 1,701 LF $30.00 $51,030.00 9 Construct Mountable Curb 364 LF $35.00 $12,740.00
10 Construct Concrete Curb and Gutter 3,111 LF $40.00 $124,440.00 11 Construct Concrete Sidewalk 18,460 SF $7.00 $129,220.00 12 Construct Concrete Stamped Truck
Apron
4,305 SF $30.00 $129,150.00
13 Construct Concrete Residential
Driveway Approach
3,447 SF $15.00 $51,705.00
14 Construct Concrete Commercial
Driveway Approach
2,008 SF $25.00 $50,200.00
15 Construct 3" Thick Brick Stamped
Concrete
1,482 SF $8.00 $11,856.00
16 Construct Concrete Curb Ramp 8 EA $3,000.00 $24,000.00 17 Construct Concrete Bicycle Ramp 8 EA $2,000.00 $16,000.00 18 Construct Concrete Pedestrian Refuge 4 EA $8,000.00 $32,000.00 19 Adjust Existing Water Valve 7 EA $800.00 $5,600.00
20 Adjust Existing Water Meter 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 21 Relocate Existing Water Meter 3 EA $1,000.00 $3,000.00 61 Action Plan and Implementation
Table 11. N Alta & Nebraska Avenue Cost Estimate Continued No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
22 Install 1" Water Service 14 EA $3,500.00 $49,000.00
23 Install 2" Water Service 3 EA $3,500.00 $10,500.00
24 Install Backflow Preventor 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00
25 Relocate Fire Hydrant 2 EA $4,500.00 $9,000.00
26 Adjust Existing Sanitary Sewer
Manhole
3 EA $1,200.00 $3,600.00
27 Install Sanitary Sewer Manhole 4 EA $6,000.00 $24,000.00 28 Install 10" Trunk Sanitary Sewer Pipe 600 LF $130.00 $78,000.00 29 Install 15" Trunk Sanitary Sewer Pipe 400 LF $135.00 $54,000.00 30 Install 4" Sanitary Sewer Service 7 EA $2,500.00 $17,500.00 31 Install 6" Sanitary Sewer Service 2 EA $2,500.00 $5,000.00 32 Construct Storm Drain Inlet 5 EA $5,000.00 $25,000.00 33 Construct 48" Storm Drain Manhole 7 EA $6,000.00 $42,000.00 34 Install 24" Storm Drain Pipe 246 LF $160.00 $39,360.00 35 Install 48" Storm Drain Pipe 1,318 LF $180.00 $237,240.00 36 Install Underground Retention Basin 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 37 Install Landscape and Irrigation Plan 34,596 SF $8.00 $276,768.00 38 Install Streetlight Pull Box 3 EA $1,300.00 $3,900.00 39 Install Directional Bore, Conduit, and
Conductors
2,476 LF $22.50 $55,710.00
40 P.O.S. and Power Connection 1 EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00 41 Install Streetlight 20 EA $8,000.00 $160,000.00
42 Relocate Chain Link Fence 220 LF $10.00 $2,200.00
43 Construct City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00 44 Worker Protection From Caving
Ground in Excavation
1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00
45 SWPP Development & Maintenance 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 46 Install Pavement Striping and Signage
and Markings
1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00
47 Acquire City Encroachment Permit 1 LS $117,000.00 $117,000.00 48 Miscellaneous Street Facilities and
Operations
1 LS $20,543.00 $20,543.00
Construction Subtotal $2,942,000.00
Introduction
62 Action Plan and Implementation
63 Table 12. S Alta & Kamm Avenue Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
Base Bid
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS 75,000.00 $75,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000.00
3 Dust Control 1 LS 3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS 35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS 4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA 1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Removing Concrete (F) 1,528 SF 1.50 $2,292.00
8 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 62,241 SF 0.25 $15,560.25 9 Remove Curb & Gutter / Curb (F) 1,169 LF 4.00 $4,676.00 10 Remove Asphalt Dike 231 LF 4.00 $924.00
11 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00
12 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,496 LF 42.00 $62,832.00
13 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,385 LF 40.00 $55,400.00 14 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
415 LF 60.00 $24,900.00
15 Retaining Curb 315 LF 30.00 $9,450.00
16 Concrete Sidewalks 14,942 SF 6.00 $89,652.00
17 Stamped Median Concrete 5,552 SF 15.00 $83,280.00
18 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
5,014 SF 25.00 $125,350.00
19 Curb Ramp 8 EA 5,500 $44,000.00
20 Detecable Warning Surfaces 1 LS 4,500 $4,500.00
21 Bike Ramp 8 EA 3,700 $29,600.00
22 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS 45,000.00 $45,000.00 23 Hot Mix Asphalt 2,003 TON 100.00 $200,300.00
24 Class II Aggregate Base 6,583 TON 80.00 $526,640.00
25 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 22,735 SF 40.00 $909,400.00 Construction Subtotal $2,386,956.25
Contingency (10%) $238,695.63
Construction Total $2,625,651.88
Action Plan and Implementation
Table 13. S Alta & Avenue 400 Cost Estimate
No. Items Units Quantity Unit Price Totals
1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Water Pollution Prevention 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 3 Dust Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
4 Traffic Control 1 LS $35,000.00 $35,000.00
5 Portable Changeable Message Signs
(PCMS)
1 LS $4,200.00 $4,200.00
6 Construction Notification Signs 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000.00 7 Remove Asphalt Concrete (F) 91,865 SF $0.25 $22,966.25 8 Remove Asphalt Dike 289 LF $4.00 $1,156.00
9 Salvage Traffic Signal/Street Light 8 EA $7,000.00 $56,000.00 10 Misc. Utility Adjustments 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 11 Stormwater Adjustments 1 LS $15,000.00 $15,000.00
12 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00
13 Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,656 LF $42.00 $153,552.00
14 Concrete Median Curb Type B1-6 1,235 LF $40.00 $49,400.00 15 Mountable Concrete Curb
(Roundabout)
315 LF $60.00 $18,900.00
16 Retaining Curb 214 LF $30.00 $6,420.00
17 Landscaping 7,379 SF $4.00 $29,516.00
18 Stamped Median Concrete 731 SF $15.00 $10,965.00
19 Stamped Structural Concrete (Truck
Aprons)
4,223 SF $25.00 $105,575.00
20 Signing, Striping, & Marking 1 LS $45,000.00 $45,000.00 21 Street Lighting 12 EA $9,700.00 $116,400.00
22 City Monument Sign 1 EA $50,000.00 $50,000.00
23 Hot Mix Asphalt 4,610 TON $100.00 $461,000.00
24 Class II Aggregate Base 6,948 TON $80.00 $555,840.00 25 ROW Acquisition (estimated) 1,387 SF $40.00 $55,480.00 Construction Subtotal $1,941,370.25
Contingency (10%) $194,137.03
Construction Total $2,135,507.28
64 Action Plan and Implementation
Potential Funding Sources
Successful implementation of the design concepts proposed by this Feasibility Study will require acquisition of reliable funding. Funding for design concept implementation may be obtained locally or through State and Federal Grant programs. Although local funding sources are often more reliable, State and Federal grants should be pursued to supplement project implementation.

The number and type of grant and loan programs available to public agencies in any given year can vary significantly based on Legislature appropriations. Many of the grant programs below are on-going with rounds of grant monies provided upon availability of funding. The grant and loan programs listed below are not exhaustive and should be updated regularly upon implementation of any design concepts proposed by this feasibility. The City of Dinuba will be responsible for developing individual applications in response to grant program solicitations.

Federal Funding Sources
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program: The CMAQ program provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs that help to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. The program funds projects that reduce congestion and improve air quality for aras that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas) and for former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance maintenance areas). This program is funded through the FAST act.
• Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act: A fairly flexible program to provide federal funding to state and regional governments for transportation related projects and programs. The AID Demonstration program, Safe Routes to School program, Transportation Enhancements Program, and Transportation Alternatives Program grants are also provided under the FAST Act. • Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) program: The BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program, previously known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) program, provides fundings funding for selected projects and programs based on considerations for safety, economic competitiveness, quality of life, environmental sustainability, state of good repair, innovation, and partnershop. The Department of Transportation (DOT) website states that the DOT intends to award 50% of BUILD transportation grant funding to projects located in rural areas to deliver positive benefits to these communities. • Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) discretionary grant program: Provides funding to State and regional governments for public infrastructure projects. • Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program (TCSP): TCSP is intended to address the relationships among transportation, community, and system preservation plans and practices and identify private sector-based initiatives to improve those relationships. State and local governments, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), and tribal governments are eligible for discretionary grants, authorized at $270 million through 2009, to carry out eligible projects to integrate transportation, community, and system preservation plans and practices. 65 Action Plan and Implementation
State Funding Sources
• Low Carbon Transportation Investments and Air Quality Improbement Program: The Low Carbon Transportation Investments and the Air Quality Improvement Program is funded through Capand-Trade auction proceeds and provides funding for projects that reduce transportation-related emissions.
• California Department of Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program:

Provides funding for projects related to housing, public works, and community facilities for low-income areas.
• Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB1): Provides increased funding to fix roads, freeways, and bridges in communities across California with funds split equally between State and Local Investments. • Transportation Development Act (TDA): the TDA provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit related purposes that comply with regional transporation plans. The act establishes two funding sources; the Local Transporation Fund (LTF), and the State Transit Assistance (STA) fund. LTF may be usd by counties with a population under 500,000 for local streets and roads, construction, and maintenance. STA funding can only be used for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes.
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD): Provides funding for a variety of local transportation related projects that support the goals of the SJVAPCD. These include funds for bike paths, electric vehicle charging stations, and public transportation subsidies. 66 Action Plan and Implementation
Project Prioritization
It is unlikely that funding will be available to implement all five intersections simultaneously. Therefore, it is important to prioritize projects that will provide the greatest community benefit first. Flexibility should be given with regard to priority order, as projects may need to be implemented out of sequence based on funding availability and readiness to proceed.

There are a number of ways projects may be prioritized. The City of Dinuba may choose to prioritize projects based on collision rates for each intersection. Because roundabouts greatly reduce the chance of injury or fatality in the event of a collision, this method of project prioritization would be the most beneficial to public safety. Using the collision history discussed in Section 3, this method would prioritize the proposed roundabout projects in the following order:

1. Alta Avenue & Road 56

2. Alta Avenue & Avenue 400

3. El Monte & Road 92

4. Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue

5. Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue
Roundabout intersections also offer substantial benefits related to traffic flow. Because traffic delay has a direct effect on greenhouse gas emissions and air quality, the City of Dinuba may choose to prioritize projects based on traffic volumes to maximize emissions reduction benefits. The proposed projects would be prioritized in the order below using this method. The Alta/Avenue 56 intersection is not included in this prioritization list because traffic counts were not available at the time of this study due to COVID-19.

1. Alta Avenue & Kamm Avenue

2. Alta Avenue & Avenue 400

3. Alta Avenue & Nebraska Avenue

4. El Monte & Road 92
The City may wish to consider other factors as they determine the most appropriate way to prioritize the proposed projects. Potential considerations include pedestrian volume, future development (such as the planned high school at Alta & Kamm) or community input. The City of Dinuba has the option to select a method of prioritization at the acceptance of this plan or at a later date. 67 City Council Staff Report
Department: PUBLIC WORKS July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: George Avila, Public Works Director
By: Anna Santillan, Fiscal Analyst I
Subject:

Resolution No. 2024-52 Authorizing Execution of Program Supplement for the use of Measure R funds for the El Monte Way Corridor Improvements Project Phase 2 (GA)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Measure R Expenditure Plan includes funding for enhancing El Monte Way across the length of the City of Dinuba. Phase 2 of these improvements includes the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of El Monte & Perry. The approval of the subject Program Supplement will allow the city to access $700,000 for the design and ROW acquisition for this project.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
In September 2020 the City Council was presented with a comprehensive Roundabout Feasibility Study that identifies future roundabouts at various major intersections. One of the sites identified is the intersection of E. El Monte Way and Perry Avenue. A new roundabout at this location would improve traffic flow, capacity, and enhance vehicular and pedestrian safety. The Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) is supportive of the city's efforts to construct roundabouts at major intersections.

Funding for the design/engineering and right-of-way (ROW) acquisition for the El Monte/Perry roundabout can be earmarked out of the city's Measure R Avenue 416 Improvements Project allocation. A total of $350,000 for professional engineering and a total of $350,000 for ROW is available for the subject project. In order to program the funds, TCAG requires that the City Council formalize this action by adopting a resolution approving a Measure R Program Supplement. A copy of the resolution and program supplement is enclosed herein as Attachment 'A' and Attachment 'B', respectively.

FISCAL IMPACT
The anticipated cost to complete design/engineering and ROW acquisition is $700,000. This entire amount would be funded with measure R funds.

PUBLIC HEARING
None.

ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Attachment 'A'-Resolution 2024-52
Attachment 'B'-Program Supplement

City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From:

Subject: 2023-24 Year-in-Review (LP)

RECOMMENDATION
Council to accept the 2023-24 Year-in-Review as an informational item.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The past year has been very productive. City staff has worked diligently to ensure that Council goals are met while providing a high level of customer service to the community.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES
None.

DISCUSSION
As outlined in the memo enclosed herein as Attachment 'A', the City of Dinuba accomplished many key goals and objectives set forth by the City Council. These activities were carried out and accomplished with the hard work and dedication of all City staff.

Despite the ongoing uncertainty over sales tax revenues as a result of the CDTFA audit, the City was able to maintain current staffing and service levels while adopting a balanced budget across all fund types. This is no small feat considering the considerable amount of sales tax revenues at stake. Staff continues to work with the CDTFA on a fair and equitable settlement of the sale tax issue and hopes to have a resolution in the coming months.

While recruitment continues to be a challenge, particularly in public safety, all departments have been able to fill some key positions in their respective departments.

The Fire Department is the one department that continues to be challenged with recruiting single-role paramedics. This seems to be an industry-wide challenge that we hope is cyclical in nature and will resume to some state of normalcy. Chief Chastain is exploring strategies to increase recruitment.

Many critical capital projects were completed are started in the past fiscal year. The new clarifier at the wastewater treatment plant was completed and is now operational.

This will provide much needed treatment capacity and redundancy at the plant.

Various streets throughout the community were rehabilitated with slurry seal and new striping including the addition of bike lanes on major corridors.

Significant improvements have also been completed at City parks. New basketball courts, solar lighting, and walking trail were installed at KC Vista Park providing much more active and passive activities during the day and into the evening hours. The new Viscaya Neighborhood Park broke ground in June and is the first park to be developed in over 30 years. This park has been long overdue and will provide a significant source of recreational opportunities to the community.

Several major new vehicles and equipment were purchased to ensure staff has the tools that they need to carry out their jobs. A new 105' fire ladder truck and new fire engine were ordered. The lead time for these specialty vehicles is about 18 months.

The Fire Department expects to receive them in 2025. A new ambulance was also purchased thanks to funding from the Alta Healthcare District.

In addition to funding new vehicles and equipment, the Alta Healthcare District Board approved a $490,000 grant to fund three (3) full-time EMTs and purchase one new ambulance very 18 months. The new staffing will help with coverage and reduce the number of EMS calls are not referred to private ambulance companies.

Some new businesses opened, and others are slated for the coming year. Of major significance is the re-tenanting of the Mercantile Row Shopping Center on the eastside. This center has remained dormant for decades with many vacant spaces.

The center is now home to several new businesses including Sequoia Foods, Brochettes Euro-Mediterranean Grill, and Superior Grocers. Five Below, a second Starbucks and Tulare Works are expected to open soon.

Lastly, to handle and plan for expected growth around the new Dinuba High School staff retained a consultant to prepare a focused General Plan Update. The update made several changes to land uses around the new High School to ensure that sufficient land is available to accommodate demand for new residential developments once the school is completed.

FISCAL IMPACT

PUBLIC HEARING
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
A. 2023-24 Year in Review Memo
City of Dinuba
Memo
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Luis Patlan, City Manager
Date: July 9, 2024
Re: 2023/24 in Review
I am pleased to present the 2023/2024 Year in Review. As highlighted in this memo, the past year has been very productive. City staff has worked diligently to implement the Council’s goals and priorities as well as continue to provide a high level of service to the community. The Council’s clear direction, strong support, and steadfast vision to improving the quality of life in the community are what allowed these and many other wins possible.

Goal #1: Fiscal Health
Objective A: Preserve sales tax revenues
 Working with CDTFA on audit of sales tax revenues
 SB 1494 (Glazer) was defeated (phase-out of sales tax sharing agreements) Objective B: Prepare balanced general fund budget
 Adopted balanced FY 2024/25 general fund budget
 Implemented utility rate adjustments to cover operations and capital projects  Earned $2.16 million in interests on all cash invested (July 1, 2023 - March 30, 2024)  Clean fiscal year-end audit for FY 2022/23
 Outsourced street sweeping services resulting in annual savings  Received CSFMO & GFOA budget award for excellence in budgeting for FY 2023/24 Objective C: Seek and secure grants for key community projects  Total grants awarded in 2023/24: $24.8 million
2 Goal #2: Quality of Life & Neighborhood Improvements
Objective A: Address homelessness in the community
 Ongoing partnership with Tulare County HHSA & Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance  Adopted anti-camping ordinance to ensure parks are accessible to all  6 homeless housed in Sierra Village Apartments
 Conduct weekly check-ins with local homeless and provided navigation services Objective B: Make improvements to existing community parks and plan for new parks  Viscaya Neighborhood Park under construction
 Installation of new restrooms at Entertainment Plaza
 Installation of two new basketball courts with solar lights at KC Park  Completion of nature-based walking trail at KC Vista Park  Installation of new solar light at KC Park parking lot (adjacent to BB & PB courts) Objective C: Focus on downtown improvements
 Awarded $2.9M Clean CA grant to upgrade and renovate Entertainment Plaza  Completion of Open Gate Thrift Store façade improvement  Completion of former Don Shoe store face improvement
 City Hall and Civic Square Conceptual Plan
 9 apartments on the second floor of former Don’s Shoe Store Objective D: Identify and plan for needed neighborhood improvements & community beautification
 Delgado neighborhood lighting study completed, and new solar lights ordered  New raised median with landscaping installed on El Monte in front of Dutch Bros.  Awarded $750k CalHome grant to fund the Housing Rehabilitation Program  Awarded $750k CalHome grant to fund the First-Time Homebuyer Downpayment Assistance Program
Goal #3: Maintaining Organizational Capacity
Objective A: Ensure adequate staffing for the organization  Hire FT Building Official and Building Inspector
 Hired second FT Code Enforcement Officer
 Fire Department implemented minimum two personnel per fire engine  Promoted George Avila to PW Director
 Promoted Greg Chastain to Fire Chief
 DFD secured $300k from Alta Health Care District to hire 3 FT EMT’s 3 Objective B: Provide organization with needed vehicles and equipment  New dump truck purchased and received for Public Works  New ambulance purchased and received (Alta Health Care grant)  105’ fire ladder truck ordered ($2.0 million state earmark)  New fire engine ordered ($900,000 Measure F)
Objective D: Maintain and update ordinances and master plans  Completion of focused General Plan Update
 Adopted Daytime Curfew for Minors
 Adopted anti-camping ordinance
Objective C: Evaluate and maintain adequate technology upgrades and infrastructure  Created work station replacement program for all city departments Goal #4: Investing in the Community
Objective A: Maintaining and expanding existing city programs & facilities  Expanded senior luncheons to five days per week ($500k CDBG grant)  Senior Center re-roof
 Interior remodel of PW offices to accommodate new staffing  Interior remodel and renaming of The Patio at Ridge Creek Golf Course  Upgrades to the existing fire department (paint, new windows, floor coverings, restroom shower, office furniture)
Objective B: Maintain and expand critical community infrastructure  New clarifier at Wastewater Treatment Plant completed  Water Well #21 under construction
 $1.0 million federal earmark awarded for Sierra Way Sewer Main Project  $2.7 million Cal OES grant to rehabilitate Pamela Storm Water Basin Objective C: Maintain and improve local roads and streets  Slurry seal at various locations (Tulare, L, Uruapan, Euclid Streets)  Reconstruction of two alleys in the downtown
 Reconstruction of E. El Monte/Crawford intersection
 Alta/Kamm Roundabout Project under construction
 Reconstruction of Crawford/Nebraska intersection
 Completion of HSIP grant safety street striping
4 Goal #5: Engaging the Community
Objective A: Employ social media to connect and inform the community  Ongoing Social Media engagement
 Prepared annual State of City video (posted on social media) Objective B: Support community events and activities
 2
nd annual BBQ Fest was a success
 Independence Day (July 4th) Fireworks Show at Ridge Creek was a success  Over 1,293 participated in Parks & Recreation programs & activities  New Adult Softball league added in 2023 and 2024
 Fire Department attended over 30 public education events with over 4600 attendees.  Dinuba PD held over 70 community oriented policing events  1,284 participated in youth sports programs
 213 students participated in the After School Program monthly  6,760 senior lunches served
Objective C: Provide support and collaborate with local service groups  Modernized agreement with the Dinuba Chamber of Commerce  Participate in the Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee  Dinuba Police Volunteers donated 1,166 hours equivalent to $46,640 cash value  City funded Fire Explorer Program – 10 explorers participating in the program  Fire Department working on partnership with Valley ROP for a Fire Training Facility  Fire and Police Chiefs participated in Fentanyl Town Hall Goal #6: Economic Development
Objective A: Market city to prospective industrial companies  Work closely with Tulare EDC on marketing and business recruitment  City demographics and retail data updated in 2023
 Council attended International Conference of Shopping Centers in May 2024 Objective B: Revitalize Mercantile Row Shopping Center
 Brochettes Euro-Mediterranean Grill open for business  Superior Grocers open for business (former Save Mart space)  Sequoia Foods open for business (portion of former Kmart space)  Ross Dress tenant improvements under construction (former Rite Aid space)  Five Below signs lease (former Rite Aid Space)
 Tulare/Dinuba Works offices under construction (portion of former Kmart space)  Second Starbucks under construction
5 Objective D: New retail businesses
 Valley Strong open for business
 The Habit Burger open for business
Objective C: Encourage new residential development
 Montebella Phase I under construction
 Montebella Phase II under construction (33 lots)
 Vineyard Estates under construction (44 lots)
 Montebella Phase III approved (88 lots)
 Rose View Estates Phase I & II approved (73 lots)
 Los Prados subdivision approved (151 lots)
 Empire Estates subdivision approved (75 lots)
Looking Ahead
As we look ahead, several projects and activities will be the focus of staff in the coming year:
 Reach fair and equitable resolution with the CDTFA on sales tax revenues  Complete construction of the Viscaya Neighborhood Park  Complete construction of the Fire Training Facility
 Entertainment Plaza Renovations ($2.9M Clean CA grant)  Vuich Park Restroom Project
 $4 million Major Street Corridor Improvement Projects  Complete 8
th Cycle Housing Element Update
 Prepare Water Master Plan
 Pursue additional retail development on City-owned 20 acres next to Walmart  El Monte/Road 56 Roundabout Project
 $17.5 million Active Transpiration Projects (ATP)
 4 new residential subdivisions expected to break ground  Chipotle Mexican Grill expected to begin construction in August/September City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Maria Alaniz, City Clerk/Human Resources Director Subject: Conference with Labor Negotiators (MA)

RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to GC Subdivision 54957.6; Agency designated representative: Maria Alaniz; Karina Solis; Luis Patlan; Daniel James
Employee Organizations: City Employees' Association; Police Officers' Association; Firefighters' Association; and Unrepresented Employees

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUTSTANDING ISSUES

DISCUSSION

FISCAL IMPACT

PUBLIC HEARING
City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE July 9, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From:

Subject: Public Employee Performance Evaluation (LP)

RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to GC Section 54957; Title: City Manager
The City Council will conduct the City Manager's annual performance evaluation.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OUTSTANDING ISSUES

DISCUSSION

FISCAL IMPACT

PUBLIC HEARING

Dinuba City CouncilJuly 9, 2024

Dinuba City Council
July 9, 2024