Dinuba City Council
June 9, 2026

1. PIPE (C-900 OR SDR-35) THROUGH MANHOLE REQUIRES AN APPROVED WATER STOP.

2. TERMINATING PIPES TO EXTEND INTO MANHOLE A MAX. 1".

3. THE TOP HALF OF ALL PIPE WITHIN THE MANHOLE IS TO BE CUT AWAY.

4. PREPARE A SMOOTH TROWELED CONCRETE CHANNEL HAVING UNIFORM GRADIENT BETWEEN PIPE INVERTS.

5. EXTEND THE CHANNEL WALLS UP TO SAME HEIGHT WITH TOP OF THE PIPE.

6. HAND TAMP 9" OF SAND, OR APPROVED BACKFILL MATERIAL, UNDER ALL PIPING COMING IN OR OUT OF THE MANHOLE UP TO TH FIRST JOINT.

7. THE BREADTH OF THE CHANNEL AT EACH JUNCTION MUST ALWAYS BE AS GREAT AS THE CHANNEL RADIUS OF THE CONNECTED

8. SLOPE THE BENCHING UP TOWARDS THE MANHOLE WALL AS INDICATED IN THE MANHOLE SECTION. TROWEL THE SURFACE SMO

9. ON A STANDARD MANHOLE, INCOMING NON-STRAIGHT LINES SHALL HAVE AN INVERT THAT IS AT LEAST 1" HIGHER THAN THE OUT-GOING LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED.

10. MAXIMUM OF 3 INLET PIPES INTO MANHOLE.

11. MAXIMUM OF 2 SANITARY SEWER LATERALS CAN BE CONNECTED TO A MANHOLE.

SIZE CHANGE

IN THE MAIN

MAIN TERMINATING

IN A MANHOLE

ALIGNMENT CHANGE

IN THE MAIN

PIPE CONTINUOUS

THROUGH MANHOLE
(SEE NOTE 3)
NOTES:

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-4

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

INVERT PLANS OF

STANDARD MANHOLES
01/24/2023

10"

VARIES WITH
PIPE DIA.
12" SUBGRADE
COMPACTED TO 95% OR
3/4" GRAVEL
9" (MIN.)
3"-6"
6"
6"
VARIES
36"
9" MIN.
12" MAX.
6' (MIN.)
24"
5" TO 7"

THICKNESS

1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "A" (6 SACK MIN.), TYPE II/V CEMENT.

2. CONCRETE CONE AND GRADE RINGS SHALL BE PRECAST REINFORCED AS PER ASTM C-478.

3. GROUT AND BAND ALL PIPE JOINTS OR INSTALL "KENT" SEAL NO. 2, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

4. GROUT MIXTURE SHALL BE 1:2 CEMENT TO SAND.

5. WHERE MANHOLES ARE NOT IN STREETS OR TRAVEL WAYS, PLACE TOP 12"-24" ABOVE EXISTING GROUND WITH A 24" CONCRETE COLLAR, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

6. BASE SHALL BE CLASS "A" (6 SACK MIX WITH 3/4" AGGREGATE).

7. WHEN ADJUSTING A MANHOLE, REFER TO CITY STD. SS-8.

8. SEWER LATERALS SHALL ENTER MANHOLE 1" ABOVE MAIN. HOLE FOR LATERALS SHALL BE BORED OR OTHER APPROVED METHO CITY ENGINEER.

9. NO FLOODING OR JETTING COMPACTION.

10. MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN MANHOLES SHALL BE 400'.

11. SEWER LATERALS, 6" AND LARGER, REQUIRE A SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE WHEN CONNECTING TO THE SANITARY SEWER MAIN

12. A MANHOLE IS REQUIRED AT EACH CHANGE IN DIRECTION, EXCLUDING SMALLER THAN 6" SEWER LATERALS.

NOTES:

MANHOLE FRAME & COVER
INSTALLATION. (SEE CITY STD. SS-8)
CLASS "A" CONCRETE
(6 SACK MIN.)
24" TO 48" OR 72"

PRECAST CONE
"KENT" SEAL BETWEEN

BARRELS
STANDARD C-478

CONCRETE PIPE

SECTION
BASE SEE NOTE 6
TROWEL
SMOOTH

SLOPE FROM SIDE OF

MANHOLE TO

SPRINGLINE OF PIPE

MANHOLE SIZING

PIPE SIZE MANHOLE SIZE
0-36" 48"
>36" 72"
48" TO 72"
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-5

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
01/24/2023

DROP BOWL MODEL WILL FIT SIZES UP TO
A4 UP TO 6"
A6 UP TO 8"
B8 UP TO 10"
B10 UP TO 12"
24" 12" AND 15" INLET PIPES
30" 18" INLET

SILICON SEAL INSIDE OF

BOWL TO MANHOLE WALL

DROP BOWL MOUNTING POSITION

FORCE LINE HOOD
1/4 OF
PIPE DIA.

NOTES:

1. ALL INSIDE DROP CONNECTIONS FOR SERVICES AND COLLECTOR SEWERS SHALL USE THE DROP BOWL AS PRODUCED BY: RELINER-DURAN, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL.

2. DROP BOWL MODEL "A4" SHALL BE USED FOR ALL INLET PIPES UP TO 6" INLETS, "A6" SHALL BE USED UP TO 8" INLETS, "B8" SHALL BE USED UP TO 10" INLETS, "B10" SHALL BE USED UP TO 12" INLETS, 24" DROP BOWL SHALL BE USED FOR 12" AND 15" INLETS, 30" DROP BOWL SHALL BE USED FOR 18" INLETS.

LINES LARGER THAN 10" SHALL BE AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.

3. THE FORCE LINE HOOD SHALL BE ATTACHED ON MODELS "A4" AND "A6" WHEN THE INCOMING LINE IS FROM A FORCE MAIN OR THE SLOPE IS S=0.03 OR GREATER.

4. SECURE DROP PIPE TO MANHOLE WALL WITH RELINER-DURAN, INC. STAINLESS STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLAMPING BRACKETS OR EQUAL. SEE CITY STD. SS-7.

5. ATTACH THE DROP BOWL AND EACH CLAMPING BRACKET TO THE MANHOLE WALL WITH 3/8" X 3-3/4" RAMSET/RED HEAD BOLTS HELD IN PLACE WITH 2 STAGE EPOXY PASTE. EPOXY SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS:

6. EPOXY PASTE SHALL BE A TWO COMPONENT, 100% SOLID SYSTEM. EPOXY SHALL BE SIKADUR 31 HI-MOD GEL BY SIKA CORPORATION OR APPROVED EQUAL.

7. THE EPOXY PASTE SHALL DEVELOP A MIN. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 5,000 PSI IN 28 DAYS WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D695 AT 73 DEGREES.

8. THE EPOXY PASTE SHALL DEVELOP A MIN. TENSILE STRENGTH OF 3,000 PSI IN 14 DAYS WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D638.

9. THE EPOXY PASTE SHALL DEVELOP A MIN. BOND STRENGTH OF 2,000 PSI IN 2 DAYS WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C882 (HARDENED CONCRETE TO HARDENED CONCRETE).

10. MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE PRINTED ON EACH CONTAINER IN WHICH THE MATERIALS ARE PACKAGED.

NOTES:

1. ALL INSIDE DROP PIPING TO BE A.B.S. OR
PVC SDR-26.

2. CEMENT ALL JOINTS.

3. CLAMPS TO BE 1-1/2 X 12 GA. STAINLESS
STEEL, ANCHORED TO M.H. WALL WITH
2-1/2" CADMIUM PLATED BOLTS.

MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER
INSTALLATION (SEE CITY STD. SS-9)

RELINER INSIDE DROP BOWL
SECURED WITH 4 STAINLESS STEEL

BOLTS OR APPROVED EQUAL

INLET PIPE

COMPRESSION

COUPLING

MORTAR - NON SHRINK

PVC CAULDER

COUPLING OR EQUAL
PVC SDR-26

GLUE FITTING

RELINER STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS
OR EQUAL. SECURE TO STRUCTURE
WITH 2 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS.

STRAP AT 4' INTERVALS (MIN. OF 2).

FOR INSIDE DROP CONNECTION
BRACKETS SEE CITY STD. SS-7

INSIDE DROP CONNECTION
30" OR

GREATER
48"
1/4 OF
PIPE DIA.
2'
6"

INSIDE DROP - PLAN

SLOPE SLOPE

INLET PIPE
ABOVE
45°
PIPE DIA. + .25'
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-6

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SANITARY SEWER DROP MANHOLE
01/24/2023

A A
NOTES:

1. STAINLESS STEEL ADJUSTABLE CLAMPING BRACKET AS MANUFACTURED BY RELINER-DURAN, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL.

2. CLAMP AND BRACKETS SHALL BE TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL, 11 GAUGE (.1196").

3. 3/16"Ø PINCH BOLT AND NUTS SHALL BE TYPE 18-8 STAINLESS STEEL.

4. STANDARD SIZES TO FIT 4", 6", 8", & 10" PVC SEWER PIPE SDR-26.

5. FOR PIPE SIZES LARGER THAN 10", CITY ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE DESIGN PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK.

TOP VIEW

DIAMETER VARIES WITH

SIZE REQUIRED
2"
1'-3" 4" 2"
B
B

SECTION B-B

SECTION A-A
1'-6"
3/8" DIA. STAINLESS

STEEL PINCH BOLT
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-7

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SANITARY SEWER DROP MANHOLE -

CLAMPING BRACKET
01/24/2023

*SEWER MAINS:

UP THRU 12" PIPE = 42" MINIMUM COVER
OVER 12" PIPE = 48" MINIMUM COVER

STREET SURFACE
4" SEWER LATERAL WITH MIN. SLOPE OF 1/4" PER FOOT.

SEE BELOW
60"
MIN.*
P
NOTES:

1. FOR DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 3' OF COVER, USE DUCTILE IRON PIPE OR C-900 PVC PIPE WITH APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA.

2. THE SLOPE OF SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2% OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

3. SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE AS-BUILT PLANS.

4. FOR CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS, USE PLASTIC SADDLE W/STAINLESS STEEL 2" CLAMPS, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONNECTION IS WATER TIGHT.

5. LOCATION OF SEWER LATERAL SHALL BE 5' FROM CENTER LOT LINE.

6. REPLACEMENT OF AN EXISTING SEWER LATERAL WILL REQUIRED A 2-WAY SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT LOCATED 24" FROM TH EXTERIOR WALL. CLEANOUT CAP SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE GRADE.

7. 5 FOOT MINIMUM BETWEEN THE TOP OF PIPE AND FINISH GRADE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 22° TO 45°

SEWER MAIN CONNECTION
L DRIVE STAKE 6" ABOVE EXIST. GROUND
UNTIL SIDEWALK IS INSTALLED AND AN "S"

IS STAMPED OVER SERVICE
STAMP "S" ON FACE OF CURB
CL

CAP END OF LINE IF

SERVICE CONNECTION IS

NOT MADE IMMEDIATELY
IF THERE IS NO C.O. AT THE RESIDENCE,
INSTALL 4" 2-WAY C.O. BETWEEN

PROPERTY LINE AND RESIDENCE
12"
5' MIN.
1/8 BENDS & 1/16

BENDS AS NEEDED

SEWER MAIN
8" MIN. DIA.

NEWLY LAID PIPE SHALL

HAVE MANUFACTURED
WYES (SEE NOTE 4)
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-8

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SEWER LATERALS
01/24/2023

COVER SIDE VIEW

TOP VIEW

TOP VIEW
25-1/4" DIA.
26-1/4" DIA.
4-1/2"
24" DIA.
31-1/2" DIA.
1-1/8"
5/8"
52" DIA. (MIN.)
27" DIA.
9" MIN.
12" MAX.
3"

JACKHAMMER
ROUND

MANHOLE ADJUSTMENT
"PHOENIX IRON WORKS"
24" FULL TRAFFIC TYPE NON-ROCKING MANHOLE
FRAME AND COVER MODEL NO. P-1090, OR
APPROVED EQUAL.

MANUFACTURER:

MARKED "SANITARY SEWER"
OR "STORM DRAIN"

PICK HOLE
EDGE

PRY-HOLE

ASTM GRID

PATTERN

GROUT HOLES
REPLACE & COMPACT 2" MIN. A.C.

AND LEVEL WITH EXIST. SURFACE.

FINISH A.C. GRADE 1/8" ABOVE

COVER IF SURFACE IS CONCRETE

GROUT JOINTS OR
"KENT" SEAL NO. 2 OR

APPROVED EQUAL,

AND BROOM FINISH

CONCRETE COLLAR
CLASS "A" (6 SACK MIN.)
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-9

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER
01/24/2023

12" 12"
24"
1/4"
8"
13"
4"
10-1/2"
9"
1-1/2"
12" MIN.

TO
18" MAX.
2" A.C.
8"
12" 12"
8" PIPE (MIN.)
45°

SECTION A-A FRAME & COVER PLAN VIEW
S
"PHOENIX IRON WORKS" FRAME AND COVER MODEL
NO. P-2502, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

1. PIPE AND FITTINGS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREIN, SHALL BE OF THE SAME MATERIAL AS THE SEWER, UNLESS APPRO ADAPTORS ARE UTILIZED.

2. PIPES AND FITTINGS SHALL BE PROPERLY ALIGNED AND MAINTAINED WHILE CONCRETE IS BEING PLACED AND ALLOWED TO HAR JOINTS FOR PIPES AND FITTINGS SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE. CONCRETE FOR BEDDING, ENCASEMENT, AND SUPPORT FOR PIPES AND FITTINGS SHALL BE PLACED UNIFORMLY AROUND THE PIPE AND FITTINGS, AND SHALL BE CLASS "A".

3. THE ACCESS FRAME, COVER AND CAP SHALL BE CAST IRON.

4. CLEANOUT INSTALLED BEHIND AN END STREET BARRICADE SHALL HAVE A 2'X2'X8" CONCRETE PAD PLACED AROUND IT.

5. JACK-HAMMER PAVEMENT AROUND THE EDGE PRIOR TO REPAVING

6. REPLACE AND COMPACT 2" AND 3" OF A.C. AND LEVEL WITH EXISTING STREET SURFACE. FINISH NEW A.C. GRADE 1/8" ABOVE CO NOTES:

A A

MANUFACTURER
COVER

FRAME AND COVER
CLASS "A" (6 SACK MIN.)
CONCRETE PAD, 8" DEEP
1/8 BEND LONG SWEEP

END CAP
8" WYE
SDR-35 OR

APPROVED EQUAL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-10

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SEWER CLEANOUT
01/24/2023

FLOW
LINE
48"
24"

ECCENTRIC MANHOLE

1. CONSTRUCTION OF MANHOLE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SEWER MANHOLE STANDARD SS-5, EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREON.

NOTES:
18"
MAX.
4" MIN.

ECCENTRIC CONE
PER ASTM C-476
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-11

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

ECCENTRIC MANHOLE
01/24/2023

6" 24" 8" 24" 6"
6"
5'-3" VARIES
INLET
24"
6" 5'-0"
6" 24" 8" 24" 6"
6" 6"
12"
6"
24"
6"

SECTIONAL PLAN

SECTION A-A
PREFAB ALT.

JENSEN PRECAST MODELS
CL750 OR CL1000
TO BE USED FOR:

1. INDUSTRIAL CLEANING PLANTS

2. STEAM CLEANING PLANTS

3. SERVICE STATION CAR WASH RACKS

4. RESTAURANTS
A A

1. SIZING IS A MINIMUM AND A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE A DESIGN 1/4" CHECKED STEEL PLATE H2O

PLATES IN TRAFFIC AREAS
4" C.I. 1/4
BEND

FLOW LINE

OF OUTFALL

CLEAN-OUT

TO GRADE
OUTLET
NOTES:

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-12

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL

GREASE TRAP
01/24/2023

4" SEWER SERVICE LATERAL
45 DEG. BEND OR AS REQUIRED
23° MIN.
45° MAX.

MIN. SLOPE 1/8" PER FT. MAX. SLOPE 1/4" PER FT.

LENGTH VARIES DEPENDING ON DEPTH OF
SERVICE & MAIN. 4" SEWER PIPE ASSUMED,

SIZE COULD VARY

INSTALL DFW BY NDS FLEXIBLE SADDLE

OR APPROVED EQUAL W/STAINLESS

STEEL CLAMPS, TEE OR WYE, SET
BETWEEN 23° & 45°

STAINLESS STEEL
STRAPS

FLOWLINE
EX. SEWER MAIN

SIZE VARIES
EX. SERVICE LATERALS TO BE CUT

BACK & NEW PIPE INSTALLED
& EXTENDED TO NEW MAIN
FLOW
4" SEWER SERVICE LATERAL

DFW BY NDS FLEXIBLE

COUPLING OR APPROVED

EQUAL W/STAINLESS STEEL
STEEL STRAPS.

PLAN VIEW

ELEVATION

1. FOR PIPES 6" TO 12" IN DIAMETER, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR (C36) WHO HAS THE PROPER EQUIPMENT AND PERMITS

IS CONSIDERED AN APPROVED AGENT AND MAY CORE INTO THE CITY'S SEWER MAINS OR REMOVE A SECTION AND INSTALL A WYE OR TEE.

2. FOR SEWER MAINS 18" OR LARGER, A MANHOLE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED WHERE CORINGS ARE MADE.

3. THE CITY PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR MUST OBSERVE ALL SADDLE & CORE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING CITY SEWER MAINS.

4. VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE SADDLES SHALL BE EXTRA STRENGTH CLAY PIPE AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "WEST COAST STANDARDS OF THE CLAY PIPE INSTITUTE".

5. OPENINGS INTO EXISTING SEWER MAINS SHALL BE MADE ONLY LARGE ENOUGH TO ADMIT ALL OF SADDLE FITTINGS.

6. THIS STANDARD DETAIL IS ONLY TO BE USED WHEN CONNECTING TO EXISTING SEWER MAIN LINES. NEW LINES SHALL HAVE WYES AS PER CITY STD. SS-8.

7. APPLY SILICON SEALANT TO COMPRESSION SCREWS AND WRAP STAINLESS STEEL STRAP WITH THREE (3) LAYERS OF PVC TAPE.

NOTES:
45° BEND

USE PIPE CEMENT

SEALANT UNDER SADDLE

STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS
EXIST. SEWER

MAIN SIZE VARIES
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
SS-13

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

SEWER LATERAL SERVICE CONNECTION

INTO EXISTING SEWER MAIN
01/24/2023

EXCAVATED
SOIL

FINISH GRADE
6"
20' MIN. CLASS "A"
6 SACK CONCRETE

FILL TO BOTTOM OF
WELL (SEE NOTE 3)

BACKFILL
(SEE NOTES 3 & 4)
24" MUSHROOM CAP

OVER CASING

WELL CASING

EXISTING GROUT SEAL

EXISTING BOREHOLE

EXISTING GRAVEL
3/4" MIN. CRUSHED
GRAVEL
24" MUSHROOM CAP

OVER CASING

1. IMPERVIOUS MATERIALS INCLUDE NEAT CEMENT, SAND-CEMENT GROUT, CONCRETE AND HIGH-SOLIDS BENTONITE.

2. FILL INCLUDES CLASS "A" CONCRETE (6 SACK MIN.) OR SLURRY ONLY.

3. ORGANIC MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE USED.

4. A PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM CITY AND/OR COUNTY, AND A WELL LOG SHALL BE PROVIDED.

5. A CITY INSPECTOR SHALL BE ON SITE DURING WELL ABANDONMENT.

6. ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH TULARE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REQUIREMENTS.

7. DURING PERIODS WHEN NO WORK IS BEING DONE ON THE WELL, SUCH AS OVERNIGHT OR WHILE WAITING FOR SEALING MATERIAL TO SET, THE WELL AND ANY SURROUNDING EXCAVATION SHALL BE COVERED. THE COVER SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ANCHORED AND STRONG ENOUGH TO KEEP FOREIGN MATERIAL FROM ENTERING WELL.

NOTES:

CUT OFF WELL
CASING AT 6' BELOW

GROUND LEVEL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-1

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

EXISTING WELL ABANDONMENT
01/24/2023

17-1/2"
15-7/8" DIA.
1-1/2"
3" 15" DIA.
4" 3/4"
9" DEEP X 27"Ø CLASS "A"
CONCRETE (6 SACK MIN.)

JACK-HAMMER AROUND EDGE

PRIOR TO REPAVING
2" A.C.
9" MIN.
3" CAP LOOSE
3" CLOSE NIPPLE GALV.
15" VALVE CASING
3" GRAVEL (MIN.)
3" GALV. PIPE (TYP.)
3" X 90° GALV. ELBOW

THRUST BLOCK SHALL BE POURED

AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL
3D
18"
D+4" PIPE PLUG TAPPED FOR
3" PIPE FITTING
3" GALV. STEEL COUPLING
INSTALL 3" RISER TO ONE SIDE OF

CASING WITH CLEARANCE TO

OPERATE VALVE
3" "FEBCO" BRASS BALL VALVE WITH

LEVER, OR APPROVED EQUAL
6"

DETECTABLE MARKING
TAPE: "CHRISTY" MODEL,

OR APPROVED EQUAL

IF ASPHALT, REPLACE & COMPACT
MIN. 2" A.C. AND LEVEL WITH

EXISTING SURFACE
FINISH A.C. GRADE 1/8"

ABOVE COVER
COVER MARKED "WATER" LOCATE
WIRE
6"

WATER MAIN D

COVER-SIDE VIEW
MANUFACTURER:
"PHOENIX IRON WORKS" FRAME
AND COVER MODEL NO. P-7001, OR

APPROVED EQUAL

BLOW-OFF FRAME & COVER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-2

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER BLOW-OFF
01/24/2023

A
PIPE SIZE 90° BEND 45° BEND 11 1/4° OR 22 1/2°
BEND

TEE OR END

DEAD TEE W/PLUG CROSS
8" 39" 33" 30" 33" 33" 27"
10" 45" 36" 33" 36" 36" 39"
12" 54" 42" 36" 44" 44" 46"
18" 94" 60" 42" 76" 76" 88"

1. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE USED FOR PIPES WITH 4" DIAMETER OR LARGER.

2. THRUST BLOCKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS "A" CONCRETE (6 SACK MIN.)

3. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE 6 INCHES.

4. THRUST BLOCKS TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL.

5. AREAS GIVEN ARE FOR CLASS 150 PIPE AT PRESSURE OF 150 P.S.I IN SOIL WITH 2,000 P.S.F.

CAPACITY. INSTALLATION USING DIFFERENT PIPE, TEST PRESSURE, AND/OR SOIL TYPES SHOULD ADJUST AREAS ACCORDINGLY, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER.

6. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE POURED A MIN. OF 5 DAYS BEFORE PRESSURIZING THE SYSTEM.

7. MEG-A-LUG JOINTS ARE REQUIRED AND THRUST BLOCKS CANNOT BE USED IN LIEU OF MEG-A-LUG JOINTS.

NOTES:

B
A
A
B
A
B
B A
B
PIPE SIZE 90° BEND 45° BEND 11 1/4° OR 22 1/2°
BEND

TEE OR END

DEAD TEE W/PLUG CROSS
8" 24" 24" 18" 21" 24" 30"
10" 24" 24" 21" 21" 24" 30"
12" 24" 24" 21" 21" 24" 30"
18" 39" 39" 39" 39" 39" 42"
90° BEND 45° BEND 22.5° BEND

TEE TEE W/ PLUG
CROSS
A
B
A
B
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-3

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

THRUST BLOCK
01/24/2023

APPROVED BACKFLOW

ASSEMBLY REQUIRED
24" MIN.
60" MAX.

FLOW THRUST BLOCK, TYP.
(SEE CITY STD. W-3) FLOW

FINISHED GRADE
LEVEL
18"
PUMPER

CONNECTION
2-1/2" FIRE DEPT.

CONNECTION

TEE OR UPRIGHT

INSTALL OS&Y POTTER

SUPERVISORY SWITCH
(TAMPER RESISTANT)

ASSEMBLY OR

APPROVED EQUAL
FLOW
C

TEST COCKS

DETECTOR ASSEMBLY

DOUBLE CHECK

ASSEMBLY
C
FIRE DEPT.

CONNECTION A
B

MINIMUM CLEARANCE LINE

MINIMUM CLEARANCE

SIZE DC A B C
1" TO 3" 12" 24" 12"
4" & UP 24" 24" 12"

1. RESILIENT SEATED SHUT OFF VALVES AND TEST COCKS ARE REQUIRED.

2. NO TAPS, TEES OR CONNECTIONS OF ANY KIND ARE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE WATER METER AND THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.

3. PROTECTION FROM FREEZE DAMAGE IS REQUIRED IN EXPOSED AREAS.

4. ASSEMBLY MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR TESTING AND MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY OF DINUBA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

5. ASSEMBLY TO BE THE SAME SIZE AS THE WATER SUPPLY LINE PER UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE.

6. PRESSURE LOSS THROUGH ASSEMBLY MUST BE INCLUDED IN PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS FOR SIZING OF THE WATER SYSTEM P UNIFORM FIRE CODE.

7. MINIMUM CLEARANCE AROUND ASSEMBLY MUST BE MAINTAINED. REFER TO MINIMUM CLEARANCE CHART ON THIS PAGE.

8. ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE WATER SYSTEM MANAGER OR CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL SPECIALIST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

9. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICES AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF DINUBA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN

10. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE INSPECTED AND TESTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE SHOWIN THE ASSEMBLY WAS TESTED AND PASSED.

11. IF VALVES ARE RESILIENT SEAT, TYPE 'A' POST INDICATOR IS REQUIRED.

12. A CITY STANDARD FIRE HYDRANT MUST BE WITHIN 25' OF FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION OR INSTALLED WITHIN 25' OF THE FIRE HYDRANT CONNECTION.

13. LOCATION OF THE ASSEMBLY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

14. OSY AND FBC WILL LABELED WITH BUILDING ADDRESS AND SUITE ADDRESS.

15. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT INFRASTRUCTURE SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE DIRECTION OF THE DINUBA FIRE DEPARTMENT.

16. CONCRETE BOLLARDS MAY REQUIRED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DINUBA FIRE DEPARTMENT.

NOTES:

PIPE SLEEVE
6" CONCRETE SLAB
WATER SUPPLY LINE 1" MIN. (TYP.)
FLOW

ANTI TAMPER DEVICE OR CHAINS SHALL BE

APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT

CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE

ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER
PL

CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE

ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-4

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

BACKFLOW DEVICE AND FIRE

DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
01/24/2023

2-1/2"Ø OUTLET
4" THICK (MIN.)

CONCRETE PAD
CL 4-1/2"
OUTLET
CL 4-1/2"
OUTLET
1'-6"
3'
1'-6"
3'

PARK STRIP/

SIDEWALK
45°
45°
SEE NOTE 2

BREAKAWAY BOLTS

THRUST BLOCK
(SEE CITY STD. W-3)
"AWWA" RESILIENT SEATED GATE VALVE, MODEL NO.

C-509-80, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

THRUST BLOCK WATER MAIN
(SEE CITY STD. W-3)
8" MIN.

PIPE RISER
WATER VALVE: WELL AND
COVER (SEE CITY STD. W-8)

ROAD SURFACE

INSTALL HYDRANT GUARD
HG1 OR APPROVED EQUAL

SIDEWALK/PARK STRIP
CURB AND GUTTER FLANGED 90° ELBOW
6" WET BARREL
18" OFF FACE

OF CURB
6" WATER PIPE

SECTION A-A

CROSS-SECTION

1. TRADE NAMES ARE SPECIFIED AS STANDARD OF ACCEPTABLE QUALITY AND FEATURES. EQUIPMENT OF EQUAL

QUALITY WITH EQUAL FEATURES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED ONLY WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE DINUBA FIRE DEPARTMENT.

2. HYDRANTS SHALL BE "CLOW" MODEL 865, WET BARREL, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

3. HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE (2)-4 1/2" DIAMETER OUTLETS AND (1)-2 1/2" DIAMETER OUTLET.

4. NOZZLE CENTERLINES SHALL BE LOCATED NOT LESS THAN 18" ABOVE FINISH GRADE.

5. GATE VALVES SHALL BE "RESILIENT SEAT" TYPE FLANGED TO MAIN LINE.

6. HYDRANT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A HYDRANT GUARD HG1 OR APPROVED EQUAL BETWEEN THE HYDRANT AND RISER.

7. A BLUE TWO-WAY REFLECTIVE MARKER SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET ADJACENT TO THE HYDRANT PER CITY STD. W-6.

8. HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE A 4.5" STORZ HYDRANT ADAPTER (MODEL: HPHA50-45NH/CAP, OR APPROVED EQUAL) ATTACHED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE 4 1/2" DIAMETER OUTLET.

9. HYDRANT SHALL BE PAINTED OSHA SAFETY YELLOW.

10. A 3' DIAMETER OR 3' SQUARE CONCRETE PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE HYDRANT.

11. ALL CAPS AND THREADS SHALL BE LUBRICATED WITH A WATER PROOF GREASE FOLLOWING INSTALLATION.

METAL CAPS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON OUTLETS.

12. MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN FIRE HYDRANTS IS 400' (RESIDENTIAL) AND 300' (COMMERCIAL).

13. PAINT CURB RED FROM CENTERLINE OF FIRE HYDRANT 15' EACH WAY.

NOTES:

SIDEWALK (WHEN PARK

STRIP IS USED)

SIDEWALK (WHEN

PARK STRIP IS USED)
2" MIN.
4" MAX.

A A

3.5" MIN.

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-5

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION
01/24/2023

TWO LANE STREET

TWO LANE STREET

AT INTERSECTION

MULTI-LANE WITH TURN LANE

MULTI LANE STREET

FOUR LANE STREET WITH

TURN LANE AT INTERSECTION

FREEWAY AND EXPRESSWAYS

R/W FENCE
MEDIAN

LEFT EDGE LINE

RIGHT EDGE LINE

SHOULDER
6"
6"
6"
6"
6" 6"
6"

FIRE HYDRANT

BLUE RETROREFLECTIVE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER
LEGEND:

1. FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL PROVIDE LOCATION(S) FOR ALL MARKERS IN COMMERCIAL LOTS AND OTHER AREAS OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.

2. MARKERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE NEW AND RELOCATED HYDRANTS AND WITHIN ALL RESURFACING PROJECTS.

3. FOR STREETS WITHOUT LANE LINE OR STREETS WITH RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AND NO PAINTED LANE LINE, INSTALL MARKERS 6" FROM CENTERLINE OR EXISTING MARKERS.

NOTES:

MARKERS - SHALL BE BLUE 2-WAY STIMSONITE LIFELITE 88AB OR EQUAL.

ADHESIVE - AN AMPLE AMOUNT OF 2 (A&B) EPOXY OR EQUAL.

SURFACES - CLEAN AND DRY TO INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.

INSTALL MARKERS WITH REFLECTIVE SURFACES FACING
ONCOMING VEHICLES AND OFFSET 2" FROM LANE LINES
TOWARD FIRE HYDRANT.

FIRE HYDRANT MARKERS
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-6

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

FIRE HYDRANT PAVEMENT

MARKER LOCATION
01/24/2023

3'-0" MIN. FROM

EDGE OF PAVEMENT
3'-0" MIN. FROM

PROPERTY LINE OR

RIGHT OF WAY

FIRE HYDRANT

CONCRETE PAD
(TYP.)

NO CURB

WITH CURB

NO SIDEWALK

NON-CONTIGUOUS

SIDEWALK

CONTINGUOUS

SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK (TYP.)

ALTERNATE

LOCATION

COLD JOINT
STRIP
CURB (TYP.)
STREET (TYP.)

STEEL BOLLARDS
SEE M-1
60°
3'-0"
30° 30°

FIRE HYDRANT WITH
6" RUN (TYP.)
3-PORTS 2-PORTS 2-2 1/2"

PORTS ONLY

STEEL BOLLARDS PORT ORIENTATION
NOTES:

1. LOCATE FIRE HYDRANT AS SHOWN ABOVE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

2. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE LARGEST PORT PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREET.

3. IF THE CONCRETE SLAB IS TO BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO A CONCRETE CURB OR SIDEWALK, A COLD JOINT STRIP SHALL BE INSTALLED.

4. CONCRETE APRON SHALL BE REQUIRED WHERE THE FIRE HYDRANT IS INSTALLED IN AN UNPAVED LOCATION. THE APRON SHALL BE 4" THICK 520-C-2500 CONCRETE.

5. WHEN DISTANCE FROM THE FIRE HYDRANT TO THE TOP OR TOE OF THE SLOPE OR WALLS IS LESS THAN 2', SPECIAL HYDRANT INSTALLATION DETAIL SHALL BE SHOW ON THE PLANS.

6. THE DISTANCE FROM THE FACE OF THE CURB TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE 2 1/2' MINIMUM.

7. WHEN REQUIRED, NUMBER OF BOLLARDS AND LOCATION TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-7

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION -

SIDEWALK
01/24/2023

WATER
MAIN
REPLACE & COMPACT MIN. 2"
A.C. AND LEVEL WITH

EXISTING SURFACE
13"
9-1/8"
FINISH A.C. GRADE 1/8"

ABOVE COVER

JACKHAMMER AROUND EDGE

PRIOR TO REPAVING
2" A.C.
10" MIN.

CLASS "A" CONCRETE
(6 SACK MIN.) COLLAR

TRAFFIC VALVE BOX
SINGLE PIECE OF 8" MIN. PIPE
RISER, C-900
#10 COPPER LOCATE WIRE
"AWWA" RESILIENT SEAT GATE
VALVE, MODEL NO. C-509-80, OR
APPROVED EQUAL.

THRUST BLOCK
(SEE CITY STD. W-3)

LOCATE WIRE

OUTSIDE OF RISER

MARKING TAPE
(SEE CITY STD. W-17)
1-3/8"
6"

1. CAST IRON COVER WITH STREET TREAD INSCRIBED "WATER".

2. ON FIRE SPRINKLER RUNS, COVER SHALL BE INSCRIBED "FIRE".

3. INSTALL "CHRISTY" G5 TRAFFIC VALVE BOX 13" DIA. X 12", OR APPROVED EQUAL.

4. MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN IN-LINE GATE VALVES IS 500 FT., OR INTERSECTION PER PLANS.

5. WRAP ALL VALVES AND FITTINGS IN 8 MIL. PLASTIC WITH 10 MIL.

TAPE.

NOTES:
"KENNEDY"
"M & H DRESSER"
"MUELLER"
"CLOW"
APPROVED GATE VALVES:
10"
SEE NOTE 1
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-8

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER VALVE, WELL, AND COVER
01/24/2023

1. WATER METERS WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. INSTALLATION FEES
SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO SETTING THE METER.

2. ALL SERVICES WITH A METER SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH
A BOX AND WITH A LID MARKED "WATER" (NO CONCRETE
BOXES OR LIDS).

3. METERS SHALL BE THE "COLD DISPLACEMENT" TYPE
WATER METER CONFORMING TO "AWWA" STD. C700, OR
APPROVED EQUAL.

4. WATER METER & BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN
THE SIDEWALK, AND NOT WITHIN THE DRIVE APPROACH.

5. ALL GALVANIZED PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED IN A 10 MIL
PIPE WRAP TAPE.

NOTES:
1" CTS POLYETHYLENE PIPE
AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM #10 COPPER LOCATE WIRE
"MUELLER B" OR "SMITH BLAIR"

BRONZE DOUBLE STRAP SADDLE,
OR APPROVED EQUAL.

WATER
MAIN

CORPORATION STOPS
SHALL BE "FORD" MODEL
NO. F1100-4 COPPER PIPE
SIZE, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

STREET SURFACE
"W" STAMPED ON FACE OF CURB
1" WATER METER: "NEPTUNE" MODEL NO. T-10, WITH
PRO READ (CUBIC FT) WITH "NEPTUNE" R-900 RADIO
MIU'S, OR APPROVED EQUAL. (SEE NOTE 1).

FIBRELTYE MODEL NO. FL36 WITH NO
READER HOLE ON LID, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

FLUSH
(TYP.)
6" TO 8" 3"
1'

SIDEWALK PARK STRIP
(IF USED)
24" TO 36" (MIN.)
45°

CURB AND GUTTER
6"

PEA GRAVEL
1" FIRE SERVICE SCHEDULE
80 PVC PIPE (TYP.)
1" WATER SERVICE SCHEDULE
80 PVC PIPE (TYP.)
1" TEE
1" INLINE VALVE

ADAPTER

FITTING JAMES
JONES J-134
1" WATER METER
1" CURB STOP

METER BOX
SOLID 14 GA. COPPER

WIRE HELD IN PLACE
AT 5' INTERVALS (TYP.)

CONNECT TO CITY WATER MAIN

LEGEND SEE LEGEND

FOR HATCHING

GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE

WATER METER PLAN VIEW

SEE LEGEND

FOR HATCHING
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-9

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
1" RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE
01/24/2023

1. WATER METERS WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. INSTALLATION FEES
SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO SETTING THE METER.

2. ALL SERVICES WITH A METER SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH
A BOX AND WITH A LID MARKED "WATER" (NO CONCRETE
BOXES OR LIDS).

3. METERS SHALL BE THE "COLD DISPLACEMENT" TYPE
WATER METER CONFORMING TO "AWWA" STD. C700, OR
APPROVED EQUAL.

4. WATER METER & BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN
THE SIDEWALK, AND NOT WITHIN THE DRIVE APPROACH.

5. ALL GALVANIZED PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED IN A 10MIL
PIPE WRAP TAPE.

NOTES:

1.5" OR 2" CTS POLYETHYLENE

PIPE AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM
#10 COPPER LOCATE WIRE
"MUELLER B" OR "SMITH BLAIR"

BRONZE SADDLE WITH STAINLESS

STEEL STRAP
WATER
MAIN

CORPORATION STOPS
SHALL BE "FORD" MODEL
NO. F1100-4 COPPER PIPE
SIZE, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

STREET SURFACE
"W" STAMPED ON FACE OF CURB

1.5" OR 2" WATER METER: "NEPTUNE" MODEL NO. T-10,
WITH PRO READ (CUBIC FT) WITH "NEPTUNE" R-900
RADIO MIU'S, OR APPROVED EQUAL. (SEE NOTE 1).

FIBRELTYE MODEL NO. FL36 WITH NO
READER HOLE ON LID, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

FLUSH
(TYP.)
6" TO 8" 3"
1'

SIDEWALK PARK STRIP
(IF USED)
24" TO 36" (MIN.)
45°

CURB AND GUTTER
6"

PEA GRAVEL

1.5" OR 2" FIRE SERVICE
SCHEDULE 80 PVC PIPE
(TYP.)

1.5" OR 2" WATER SERVICE
SCHEDULE 80 PVC PIPE (TYP.)

1.5" TEE

1.5" OR 2" INLINE VALVE

ADAPTER

FITTING JAMES
JONES J-134

1.5" OR 2" WATER METER

1.5" OR 2" CURB
STOP

METER BOX
SOLID 14 GA. COPPER

WIRE HELD IN PLACE
AT 5' INTERVALS (TYP.)

CONNECT TO CITY WATER MAIN

LEGEND SEE LEGEND

FOR HATCHING

GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE

WATER METER PLAN VIEW

SEE LEGEND

FOR HATCHING
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-10

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

1.5" & 2" RESIDENTIAL WATER

SERVICE
01/24/2023

A. FIBRELTYE MODEL NO. FL36
B. 2" ANGLE METER VALVE (J-4205) WITH 2" METER FLANGE
ADAPTER (J-129M)
C. 2" GALVANIZED IRON TEE WITH (2) 2"X1" MIPxFIP GALVANIZED

IRON HEX BUSHING CONNECTORS
D. 1" GALVANIZED IRON TEE (FIP x FIP x FIP)
E. 1" GALVANIZED IRON ELBOW (FIP x FIP)
F. 1" DIA., GALVANIZED IRON PIPE
G. 1" STRAIGHT METER VALVE, FIP x METER SWIVEL NUT (J-1903W) LEGEND
2" CTS POLYETHYLENE PIPE

AS SPECIFIED IN ASTM
"MUELLER B" OR "SMITH BLAIR"

BRONZE SADDLE WITH STAINLESS

STEEL STRAP
WATER
MAIN

CORPORATION STOPS
SHALL BE "FORD" MODEL
NO. F1100-4 COPPER PIPE
SIZE, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
"W" STAMPED ON

FACE OF CURB

SIDEWALK

STREET SURFACE
FIBRELTYE MODEL NO. FL36 4'-6" MIN.

CURB & GUTTER
2" ANGLE METER VALVE
(J-4205) WITH 2" METER
FLANGE ADAPTER (J-129M)
2" GALVANIZED IRON TEE
WITH (2) 2"X1" MIPxFIP

GALVANIZED IRON HEX

BUSHING CONNECTORS

PEA GRAVEL
1" STRAIGHT METER VALVE,
FIP x METER SWIVEL NUT (J-1903W)
10"
4"
6"
4" 4"

1. PARTS NUMBER PRECEDED WITH J ARE JAMES JONES CO..

2. 5/8" DISPLACEMENT TYPE MAGNETIC DRIVE STRAIGHT
READING GALLONS.

3. METER BOX NOT TO BE INSTALLED IN SIDEWALK/DRIVE
APPROACH.

4. BOXES IN ALLEYS SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC LOADS SHALL

HAVE TRAFFIC RATED LIDS & BOXES AS DIRECTED BY THE
ENGINEER.

5. ALL GALVANIZED PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED IN A 10MIL PIPE WRAP TAPE.

NOTES:
6" MIN.

A
A
A
G
G
G
F
F
F
F
F
D
C
B
A
6" MIN.
6" MIN.

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-11

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
COMMERCIAL 3-MANIFOLD

WATER SERVICE
01/24/2023

WATER
MAIN

SIDEWALK

1. WATER METERS WILL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. INSTALLATION FEES SHALL BE PAID PRIOR TO SETTING THE METER.

2. ALL SERVICES WITH A METER SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH A BOX AND WITH A LID MARKED "WATER" (NO CONCRETE BOXES OR LIDS).

3. METERS SHALL BE THE "COLD DISPLACEMENT" TYPE WATER METER CONFORMING TO "AWWA" STD. C700, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

4. WATER METER & BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK, AND NOT WITHIN THE DRIVE APPROACH.

6. ALL GALVANIZED PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED IN A 10MIL PIPE WRAP TAPE.

NOTES:
"W" STAMPED ON FACE OF CURB

STREET SURFACE
2" METER VALVE BY PACK JOINT
FOR CTS: "FORD" FV43-777W, OR

APPROVED EQUAL
2" "FORD" ANGLE VALVE MODEL
NO. BF-777 WITH SHUT-OFF

VALVE, OR APPROVED EQUAL
#10 COPPER LOCATE
WIRE
45°
18"
3"
90° BRASS
COUP. OR PACK
JOINT COUP.

FOR CTS
2" TYPE "K" COPPER TUBING OR

CTS POLYETHELENE PIPE AS

SPECIFIED IN ASTM
"MUELLER B" OR "SMITH BLAIR"

BRONZE DOUBLE , OR

APPROVED EQUAL
2" CORPORATION STOPS
SHALL BE "FORD" MODEL
NO. F1100-7, OR

APPROVED EQUAL
24" TO
36" MIN.

PARKSTRIP
(IF USED)
1'

CURB & GUTTER
6" TO 8"
10"
6"

PEA GRAVEL

1.5" OR 2" WATER METER: "NEPTUNE" MODEL NO. T-10,
WITH PRO READ (CUBIC FT) WITH "NEPTUNE" R-900
RADIO MIU'S, OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE NOTE 1)
FIBRELTYE MODEL NO. FL36 WITH NO

READER HOLE ON LID, OR APPROVED EQUAL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-12

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
2" COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE
01/24/2023

1. VALVES TO BE MUELLER A-2360 OR EQUAL WITH 2" SQUARE NUTS, CCW TO OPEN.

2. 6" SEAL/BENCH WITH CONCRETE INSIDE OF VAULTS.

3. METER BOX IN SIDEWALK OR PLACE 3-1/2" THICK CL2 CONCRETE SLAB, 1' ON ALL SIDES OF BOX

4. 23-1/4" GALVANIZED SPACER SHALL BE INSTALLED.

5. TOP OF OPERATIVE SQUARE NUT TO BE 4" MIN. TO 12" MAX. BELOW BOTTOM OF LID.

6. TRACER WIRE TO BE #10 STRANDED COPPER WITH WHITE INSULATION.

NOTES:
35"
MIN.
64-1/2" MIN.

FLOW
4"
MIN. 12" MIN.
12" MIN.
4"
MIN.
4"
MIN.
4"
MIN.

SEE NOTE 5
18" MIN. TO

FACE OF CURB
4" FLANGED

GATE VALVE,

CCW TO OPEN
VALVE
(SEE CITY
STD. W-8)
18" MIN. TO

FACE OF CURB
6" NEPTUNE MACH

ULTRASONIC METER

PLAN VIEW

ELEVATION

FINISH GRADE
4" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED ELBOW
4" NEPTUNE MACH 10

ULTRASONIC METER
(SEE NOTE 4)
4" FLANGED

GATE VALVE,

CCW TO OPEN
4" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED ELBOW

STREET SURFACE

CURB & GUTTER
4" NEPTUNE MACH
10 ULTRASONIC
METER
4" PVC C900 OR

DUCTILE IRON PIPE
CLASS 150 OR HIGHER
4" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGE X MJ ELBOW

THRUST BLOCK
(SEE CITY STD. W-3)
4" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED SPOOL,

LENGTH AS NEEDED

TRACER WIRE
(SEE NOTE 6)
FLOW

WATER MAIN
4" FLANGED GATE

VALVE, CCW TO
OPEN
4" PVC C900 OR

DUCTILE IRON PIPE
CLASS 150 OR HIGHER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-13

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
4" COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE
01/24/2023

1. VALVES TO BE MUELLER A-2360 OR EQUAL WITH 2" SQUARE NUTS, CCW TO OPEN.

2. 6" SEAL/BENCH WITH CONCRETE INSIDE OF VAULTS.

3. METER BOX IN SIDEWALK OR PLACE 3-1/2" THICK CL2 CONCRETE SLAB, 1' ON ALL SIDES OF BOX

4. 27-1/4" GALVANIZED SPACER SHALL BE INSTALLED.

5. TOP OF OPERATIVE SQUARE NUT TO BE 4" MIN. TO 12" MAX. BELOW BOTTOM OF LID.

6. TRACER WIRE TO BE #10 STRANDED COPPER WITH WHITE INSULATION.

NOTES:
35"
MIN.
64-1/2" MIN.

FLOW
4"
MIN. 12" MIN.
12" MIN.
4"
MIN.
4"
MIN.
4"
MIN.

SEE NOTE 5
18" MIN. TO

FACE OF CURB
6" FLANGED

GATE VALVE,

CCW TO OPEN
VALVE
(SEE CITY
STD. W-8)
18" MIN. TO

FACE OF CURB
6" NEPTUNE MACH

ULTRASONIC METER

PLAN VIEW

ELEVATION

FINISH GRADE
6" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED ELBOW
6" NEPTUNE MACH 10

ULTRASONIC METER
(SEE NOTE 4)
6" FLANGED

GATE VALVE,

CCW TO OPEN
6" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED ELBOW

STREET SURFACE

CURB & GUTTER
6" NEPTUNE MACH
10 ULTRASONIC
METER
6" PVC C900 OR

DUCTILE IRON PIPE
CLASS 150 OR HIGHER
6" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGE X MJ ELBOW

THRUST BLOCK
(SEE CITY STD. W-3)
6" DUCTILE IRON

FLANGED SPOOL,

LENGTH AS NEEDED

TRACER WIRE
(SEE NOTE 6)
FLOW

WATER MAIN
6" FLANGED GATE

VALVE, CCW TO
OPEN
6" PVC C900 OR

DUCTILE IRON PIPE
CLASS 150 OR HIGHER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-14

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
6" COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE
01/24/2023

"FEBCO" MODEL NO. 825Y,
OR APPROVED EQUAL.

EQUIPMENT COVER PER
CITY STD. W-24

RESILIENT SEAL

GATE/BALL
VALVES
ELL (TYP.)
UNION
(TYP.)
FLOW

FLANGE TO FLANGE OR
THREADED FITTINGS (TYP.)

FINISH GRADE
4" THK. CONCRETE SLAB

PIPE SLEEVE

GALVANIZED STEEL
PIPE (TYP.)
GALV. STEEL OR
PVC SCHEDULE 40 FLOW
18" MIN. TO 30" MAX.

ABOVE FINISH GRADE

OR FLOOR LINE

1. ALL PIPE FITTINGS SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40, OR GALVANIZED STEEL, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

2. BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICE AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE APPROVED AND INSPECTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

3. VALVE ASSEMBLIES MAY HAVE SCREWED FITTINGS OR FLANGED FITTINGS.

4. COAT ALL EXPOSED THREADS WITH AN APPROVED RUST INHIBITING SEALANT.

5. APPROVED PLASTIC TAPE, 1/2" WIDE, SHALL BE USED ON ALL THREADED CONNECTIONS.

6. DISSIMILAR METALS SHALL BE SEPARATED BY AN APPROVED DIELECTRIC COUPLING.

7. PLASTIC PIPE SHALL NOT BE USED ABOVE FINISH GRADE.

8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADJUSTABLE PIPE SUPPORT APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER . 9. PROVIDE 24" MIN. CLEAR SPACE AROUND BLACKFLOW PREVENTER OR AT THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR DISCRETION.

NOTES:

PIPE SLEEVE
1" MIN. (TYP.)
1/2"
GALV. STEEL OR
PVC SCHEDULE 40

THRUST BLOCK (SEE
CITY STD. W-3) NOTE:

THE BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY SHALL

BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY AN APPROVED

AWWA OR ABPA CERTIFIED TESTER WITHIN
FIVE (5) DAYS OF INSTALLATION WITH THE
RESULTS SENT TO THE CITY OF DINUBA.

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-15

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS
3/4" TO 2" REDUCED PRESSURE

PRINCIPAL BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
01/24/2023

WATER
10"
10"
8" MIN.

VARIES
TO BE PAVED WITH 2" A.C. (85-100 PENETRATION
ASPHALT). TACK-COAT CONCRETE AND METAL

SURFACES PRIOR TO PAVING
8" CASING & COVER
CHRISTY G-5
CHRISTY G-5 CAST IRON

TRAFFIC LID OR

APPROVED EQUAL
10" CONCRETE COLLAR

UNDER PAVING

POUR CONCRETE

COLLAR AROUND
CASING-LEAVE 2" LOW

FOR AC PAVING

VALVE-AWWA NON-RISING STEM

AND O-RING SEALS RESILIENT
WEDGE GATE VALVE #12 CU TRACER WIRE

VALVE TO BE FLANGE

COUPLED TO THE MAIN
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-16

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER VALVE
01/24/2023

SPRINGLINE

1. USE SPECIAL CARE IN BEDDING FLEXIBLE PIPE TO ENSURE SIDEWALL SUPPORT.

2. LESS COVER FOR 8" PIPE MAY BE ALLOWED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

3. TRACER WIRE TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL WATER MAINS, WATER SERVICES, AND HYDRANT LATERALS.

4. WHEN UNSTABLE SOIL IS ENCOUNTERED CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM TRENCHING ACTIVITIES PER CALIFORNIA OSHA STANDARDS.

5. JETTING OF TRENCHES IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

6. MINIMUM WATER MAIN SIZE SHALL BE 8". MINIMUM SEWER MAIN SIZE SHALL BE 8". MINIMUM STORM DRAIN MAIN SIZE SHALL BE 1

7. NEWLY CONSTRUCTED SEWER AND STORM DRAIN MANS SHALL BE WAYNE BALLED, MANDREL, AIR TESTED AND VIDEO INSPECTE ALL TESTING SHALL BE OVER SEEN BY A CITY REPRESENTATIVE.

8. PERMANENT RESURFACING OF PAVEMENT AREAS SHALL CONSIST OF 7" A.C. PAVING OR MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION I PAVEMENT CUT IS WIDER THAN 6' UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. EXISTING PAVEMENT CUT EDGES SHA BE SAWCUT AND TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED PRIOR TO FINAL PAVING.

9. UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, ALL CUTS MADE IN PAVEMENT 5 YEARS AND YOUNGER SHALL BE TREAT WITH THE INFRARED PAVEMENT REPAIR PROCESS A MIN. OF 6" ON EACH SIDE OF SAWCUT. FOR PAVEMENT CUTS LESS THAN 2' I WIDTH, THE INFRARED PAVEMENT REPAIR SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE ENTIRE AREA. WHEN INFRARED PAVEMENT REPAIR IS NOT REQUIRED, A CRACK SEALANT SHALL BE APPLIED ALONG THE PAVEMENT CUTS.

NOTES:

RESURFACE WITH A 7" MIN. A.C. PAVEMENT

COMPACT LEVEL WITH EXISTING SURFACE
(SEE NOTES 8 & 9)

SAWCUT EDGE PRIOR

TO REPAVING
7"
24"
3" DETECTABLE MARKING TAPE: "CHRISTY"

MODEL, OR APPROVED EQUAL

BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE
MECHANICALLY COMPACTED IN 12"
MAX. LIFTS

TRENCH SHALL

COMPLY WITH

CALIFORNIA OSHA

STANDARDS
#10 GAUGE COPPER TRACER WIRE

ON WATER MAINS ONLY

SAND BACKFILL

HAND TAMPED SAND TO
SPRINGLINE IN 3" LIFTS

STABILIZATION MATERIAL, SAND OR

APPROVED EQUAL
90% MIN.

REL. COMP. PIPE DIA.
4" MIN.
12"
90% MIN. REL.

COMP.
±24"
95% MIN.

REL. COMP.

FOR 8" PIPE = 22" TO 32"
FOR 10" PIPE = 24" TO 34"
FOR 12" PIPE = 26" TO 36"
FOR 14" PIPE = 28" TO 36"
FOR 16" PIPE = 48" TO 60"
FOR 48" PIPE = 96" TO 102"

TRENCH WIDTH
8" (MIN.) THRU 12" PIPE = 42" (MIN.) COVER
OVER 12" PIPE = 48" (MIN.) COVER

WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM DRAIN MAINS
6" MIN. OVERCUT
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-17

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

TRENCH DETAIL
01/24/2023

WM
3'
3' SAMPLING STATION
DOOR
3'-10"
1-3/4"
1/2" DIA. X 6" STEEL ANCHOR

BOLTS WITH ACORN NUTS
36" X 36" X 6" THK.

CONCRETE SLAB
1" PVC PIPE (SCH. 40)
4'-6" WIDE SIDEWALK
WM
3'
3'

SAMPLING STATION
1'
1'
6"

CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER
A
A
7-10' PARK STRIP
1' CONCRETE PARK

STRIP (IF USED)

TOP VIEW WITH PARK STRIP TOP VIEW WITHOUT PARK STRIP

SECTION A-A
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-18

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER SAMPLE STATION
(SHEET 1 OF 2)
01/24/2023

SHELF

DOOR TO BE MOUNTED

OPPOSITE FROM

VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AREA

SAMPLER HOUSING
3/8" O.D. COPPER TUBING
TYPE "K" SOFT DRAWN

POSITION SAMPLE LINE OUTLET
DIRECTLY OVER 1 1/2" DRAIN HOLE
3/8" TUBE SIZE IMPERIAL #100
H.D. VALVE, BRASS MOUNT ON

VALVE HOLDER
6' MIN.
3/4" P.V.C. DRAIN LINE
WITH 90° ELL (TYP)

SAMPLE LINE

FROM METER
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-19

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER SAMPLE STATION
(SHEET 2 OF 2)
01/24/2023

FLOW

1. RESILIENT SEATED SHUT-OFF VALVES AND TEST COCKS ARE REQUIRED.

2. NO TAPS, TEES OR CONNECTIONS OF ANY KIND ARE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE WATER METER AND THE PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY.

3. PROTECTION FROM FREEZE DAMAGE IS REQUIRED IN EXPOSED AREAS.

4. ASSEMBLY MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR TESTING AND MAINTENANCE PER CITY OF DINUBA MUNICIPAL CODE.

5. ASSEMBLY TO BE THE SAME SIZE AS THE WATER SUPPLY LINE PER UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE.

6. PRESSURE LOSS THROUGH PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER ASSEMBLY MUST BE INCLUDED IN PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS FOR SIZING OF THE WATER SYSTEM PER UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE.

7. DOWNSTREAM PIPING MAY HAVE VALVES IN SYSTEM.

8. INSTALL ONE UNION IN THE PIPING SYSTEM WITHIN 12 INCHES OF THE ASSEMBLY.

9. ASSEMBLY CAN NOT BE SUBJECT TO BACK PRESSURE FROM PUMPS, ELEVATION, OR OTHER SOURCES.

10. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES, MAXIMUM OF 18 INCHES CLEARANCE AROUND ASSEMBLY.

11. ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

NOTES:

UNION JOINT
INSTALL "Y" STRAINER

WHERE DIRECTED

UNION JOINT

SPRINKLER
HEAD
VALVE
18" MIN.

FLOW
24" MIN.
60" MAX.
30" MAX.
18" MIN.

EQUIPMENT COVER PER
CITY STD. W-24
PIPE
SLEEVE
24" MIN. PIPE
SLEEVE

3.5" THICK

CONCRETE PAD
1/2"
PL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-20

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER

BLACKFLOW PREVENTER INSTALLATION
01/24/2023

1. INLET AND OUTLET VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AT EACH END OF ASSEMBLY.

2. ALL WATER METERS SHALL BE "NEPTUNE" REMOTE READ, OR APPROVED EQUAL.

3. ALL WATER METERS LARGER THAN 2" SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE OWNER, DEVELOPER, OR CONTRACTOR.

NOTES:

FLOW FLOW

STRAINER
METER

APPROVED REDUCED

PRESSURE DEVICE

FLOW FLOW

THRUST BLOCK, SEE
CITY STD. W-3 (TYP.)
90° BEND
12" SPACER SPOOL

GATE VALVE
12" CLR.

GATE VALVE
90° BEND

FINISHED GRADE
CLASS "A"

CONCRETE
(6 SACK MIN.)
12" SQ.
1"

CROSS SECTION

PLAN VIEW

CONTRACTOR

WILL PROVIDE

ADJUSTABLE

PIPE SUPPORT

APPROVED BY

CITY ENGINEER
LEVEL
WATER
SUPPLY
LINE
6"
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-21

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

COMPOUND OR TURBINE METER SETTING

WITH REDUCED PRESSURE DEVICE
01/24/2023

APPROVED BACKFLOW

ASSEMBLY REQUIRED

1. RESILIENT SEATED SHUT OFF VALVES AND TEST COCKS ARE REQUIRED.

2. NO TAPS, TEES, CONNECTIONS OF ANY KIND ARE PERMITTED BETWEEN THE WATER METER AND THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.

3. PROTECTION FROM FREEZE DAMAGE MAY BE REQUIRED IN EXPOSED AREAS.

4. ASSEMBLY MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR TESTING AND MAINTENANCE PER CITY OF DINUBA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

5. ASSEMBLY TO BE THE SAME SIZE AS THE WATER SUPPLY LINE PER UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE.

6. PRESSURE LOSS THROUGH ASSEMBLY MUST BE INCLUDED IN PRESSURE LOSS CALCULATIONS FOR SIZING OF THE WATER SYSTEM PER UNIFORM BUILDING CODE.

7. MINIMUM CLEARANCES AROUND ASSEMBLY MUST BE MAINTAINED. REFER TO MINIMUM CLEARANCE CHART ON THIS PAGE.

8. DRAINAGE TO EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED WHEN ASSEMBLY IS INSTALLED INSIDE.

9. ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE WATER SYSTEM MANAGER OR CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL SPECIALIST PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

10. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICES AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY OF DINUBA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.

11. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE INSPECTED AND TESTED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OR PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE SHOWING THE ASSEMBLY WAS TESTED AND PASSED.

NOTES:

FLOW
LEVEL

FINISHED GRADE
12" TO 18"
24" MIN.
60" MAX.

WATER SUPPLY LINE FLOW

THRUST BLOCK, SEE
CITY STD. W-3 (TYP.)

MINIMUM CLEARANCE

SIZE DC A B C
1" TO 3" 12" 24" 12"
4" & UP 24" 24" 12"
B
C

DOUBLE CHECK

ASSEMBLY
C

MINIMUM CLEARANCE LINE

TEST COCKS

PIPE SLEEVE
1/2"

3.5" THICK PIPE SLEEVE

CONCRETE PAD CONTRACTOR WILL

PROVIDE ADJUSTABLE

PIPE SUPPORT

APPROVED BY CITY

ENGINEER

EQUIPMENT COVER,
SEE CITY STD. W-24
A
PL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-22

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

DOUBLE CHECK VALVE
01/24/2023

PERMANENTLY

ATTACHED PIPE

HOSE CONNECTION

FROM WATER SOURCE

APPROVED AIR GAP

AIR-GAP PROTECTION

MECHANICAL ASSEMBLY PROTECTION

APPROVED RP

FROM WATER
SOURCE

APPROVED RP

FROM WATER
SOURCE

1. AIR-GAP MUST BE AN APPROVED "AIR-GAP" SYSTEM.

2. MECHANICAL BACKFLOW PREVENTER MUST BE AN APPROVED REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPAL ASSEMBLY.

3. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY MUST BE TESTED BY A CERTIFIED BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE TESTER, WHO IS REGISTERED WITH CITY. THE TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED ONCE A YEAR. THE TEST RESULTS MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY.

4. TYPICAL EQUIPMENT: WATER TRUCKS, PEST CONTROL TRUCKS, HYDROSEEDING EQUIPMENT, PORTABLE WASHING, AND STEAM CLEANING EQUIPMENT.

REQUIREMENTS:

CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-23

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

APPROVED PORTABLE WATER

TRANSPORT BACKFLOW PROTECTION
01/24/2023

· PLASTICOTE POWDER COAT FINISH
· ACCEPTS PADLOCK
· FOREST GREEN IN COLOR
· PLASTICOTE POWDER COAT FINISH
· ACCEPTS PADLOCK
· HINGED FOR EASY ACCESS
· FOREST GREEN IN COLOR

LIFT-OFF ENCLOSURES

TYPE LENGTH (L) HEIGHT (H) WIDTH (W)
GS-.5 12" 18" 10"
GS-1 22" 24" 10"
GS-2 30" 24" 10"
GS-3.3 30" 30" 16"
H
L
L
H
W
W

HINGED BODY ENCLOSURES

TYPE LENGTH (L) HEIGHT (H) WIDTH (W)
GS-3 40" 24" 10"
GS-4 46" 30" 16"
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-24

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

EQUIPMENT COVERS
01/24/2023

CROSS CONNECTION
NOTES:

LINE VALVE (RT X RT)

GATE VALVE (FL X RT)

SECONDARY LINE

CROSS (FL)

TRANSMISSION GRID LINE TRANSMISSION GRID LINE

SECONDARY LINE

TEE (FL)

GATE VALVE (FL X RT)

1. MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN VALVES
IS 500'.

TEE CONNECTION
CL
CL
CL
CL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-25

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

WATER MAIN INTERSECTION

CONNECTIONS
01/24/2023

P.U.E.

UTILITY
TRENCH

CITY R/W
6' 6'
WATER
MAIN
10' MIN.
(O.D. TO O.D.) STORM

DRAIN MAIN

SANITARY

SEWER MAIN

UTILITY
TRENCH
P.U.E.

1. WATER MAINS AND STORM DRAIN MAINS SHALL BE PLACED NORTH OR WEST OF THE STREET CENTERLINE.

2. SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE PLACED TO THE SOUTH OR EAST OF THE STREET CENTERLINE.

3. FOR LOCATION OF WATER SERVICES AND SEWER LATERALS, SEE CITY STD. SS-1.

4. THERE SHALL BE A 10' MINIMUM OUTSIDE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE OF PIPE DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER MAINS, SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND STORM DRAIN MAINS.

5. BACKFILL IN PARKWAY OR STREET INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY CITY STD. W-12.

6. LOCATION OF UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE WITHIN THE P.U.E. EXCEPT FOR CROSSINGS.

7. AT NO TIME WILL SANITARY SEWER LINES BE ALLOWED IN A TRENCH OCCUPIED BY PRIMARY OR SECONDARY ELECTRICAL POWER.

8. EACH UTILITY COMPANY MAY HAVE ONE OR MORE CONDUITS OR CONDUCTORS IN A JOINT UTILITY TRENCH.

9. DEPTHS TO VARY ACCORDING TO CONDUIT SIZES AND LATERAL INTERFERENCE AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS.

10. ALL CONDUCTORS OR CONDUITS SHALL HAVE 3" MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM TRENCH SIDEWALL.

NOTES:

MINIMUM PIPE DIAMETER FOR:

WATER MAIN:8"
SANITARY SEWER MAIN: 8"
STORM DRAIN MAIN: 18"
10' MIN.
(O.D. TO O.D.)
PL
CL
6'
42" (TYP.) UNLESS

OTHERWISE NOTED

AND APPROVED BY

THE CITY ENGINEER
PL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-26

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

LOCATIONS OF UTILITY MAINS
01/24/2023

STORM DRAIN

SANITARY SEWER

WATER MAIN

SANITARY SEWER

WATER MAIN

STORM DRAIN

1. THIS "STANDARD" IS A GUIDE ONLY AND DEVIATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTABLE WHERE CONDITIONS DICTATE.

2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE DESIRABLE BUT DO NOT GOVERN.

3. THE INTENTION IS TO SHOW THE RELATIVE POSITION OF ALL UTILITIES.

4. ANY CHANGES OR DEVIATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

MH
MH 6' MIN.

NOTES:

CL
10' MIN.
10' MIN.
6' MIN.

CL CL
CL
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:

APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER

APPROVED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

REVISIONS

NAME BY DATE
W-27

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

LOCATIONS FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS
& PIPES IN RESIDENTIAL AREA CITY STREETS
01/24/2023

CITY OF DINUBA – ADA TRANSITION REPORT
Page | 38
Appendix J – Glossary of Terms
ABA: See Architectural Barriers Act.

ADA: See Americans with Disabilities Act.

ADA Transition Plan: Transportation system plan that identifies accessibility needs, the process to fully integrate accessibility improvements, and aims to ensure that all transportation facilities, services, programs, and activities are accessible to all individuals.

ADAAG: See Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines.

Accessible: A facility that provides access to people with disabilities using the design requirements of the ADA.

Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS): A device that communicates information about the WALK phase in audible and vibrotactile formats.

Alteration: A change to a facility in the public right-of-way that affects or could affect access, circulation, or use. An alteration must not decrease or have the effect of decreasing the accessibility of a facility or an accessible connection to an adjacent building or site.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Civil rights legislation passed in 1990 and effective July 1992. The ADA sets design guidelines for accessibility to public facilities, including sidewalks and trails, by individuals with disabilities.

Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG): Contains scoping and technical requirements for accessibility to buildings and public facilities by individuals with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990.

APS: See Accessible Pedestrian Signal.

Architectural Barriers Act (ABA): Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment.

Capital Improvement Program (CIP): The CIP for a public agency typically includes an annual capital budget and a five-year plan for funding the new construction and reconstruction projects on the agency’s transportation system.

Detectable Warning: A surface feature of truncated domes, built in or applied to the walking surface to indicate an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way.

DOJ: See United States Department of Justice.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): A branch of the U.S. Department of Transportation that administers the federal-aid Highway Program, providing financial

CITY OF DINUBA – ADA TRANSITION REPORT
Page | 39
assistance to states to construct and improve highways, urban and rural roads, and bridges.

FHWA: See Federal Highway Administration.

Pedestrian Access Route (PAR): A continuous and unobstructed walkway within a pedestrian circulation path that provides accessibility.

Pedestrian Circulation Route (PCR): A prepared exterior or interior way of passage provided for pedestrian travel.

PROWAG: Federal accessibility standards governing pedestrian facilities within the public rights-of-way, adopted by the U.S. Access Board and issued as a Final Rule effective September 7, 2023. PROWAG establishes scoping and technical requirements for elements such as sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, street furnishings, transit stops, on-street parking, and other components of public pedestrian circulation systems.

Right-of-Way: A general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for the network of streets, sidewalks and trails creating public pedestrian access within a public entity’s jurisdictional limits.

Section 504: The section of the Rehabilitation Act that prohibits discrimination by any program or activity conducted by the federal government.

Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS): Accessibility standards that all federal agencies are required to meet; includes scoping and technical specifications.

United States Access Board: An independent federal agency that develops and maintains design criteria for buildings and other improvements, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment, and electronic and information technology. It also enforces accessibility standards that cover federally funded facilities.

United States Department of Justice: Federal executive department responsible for enforcement of the law and administration of justice (also referred to as the Justice Department or DOJ).

CITY OF DINUBA – ADA TRANSITION REPORT
Page | 40
Appendix K – PROWAG (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines) https://www.access-board.gov/prowag/

City Council Staff Report
Department: PUBLIC WORKS June 9, 2026
To: Mayor and City Council
From: George Avila, Public Works Director
By: Elva Patino, Business Manager
Subject: Authorization to Award the Purchase for Replacement Headworks Influent Pumps at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (GA)
RECOMMENDATION:

Council authorize the purchase of replacement headworks influent pumps for the Wastewater Treatment Plant and Award to Shape Incorporated.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Wastewater Treatment Plant influent pumps located at the headworks are critical components of the City’s wastewater collection and treatment system. The existing pumps have reached the end of their useful life and require replacement to maintain reliable plant operations and prevent potential sanitary sewer overflows or operational failures. Staff obtained quotes for replacement pumps and associated equipment and recommends awarding the purchase to Shape Incorporated based on the proposed equipment pricing and operational needs of the facility.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES:

None
DISCUSSION:

The influent pumps at the headworks of the Wastewater Treatment Plant are responsible for conveying incoming wastewater flows through the treatment process.

Due to age, wear, and ongoing operational demands, the existing pumps have deteriorated and are becoming increasingly unreliable. Failure of these pumps could disrupt plant operations, create emergency repair situations, and potentially result in regulatory compliance issues.

As part of the City’s ongoing commitment to maintaining critical wastewater infrastructure, staff evaluated replacement options for the influent pumps. The

proposed improvements include removal and replacement of the existing pumps, installation of new energy-efficient equipment, and associated upgrades necessary for proper operation and integration with the facility systems.

Staff received quotes from the following vendors (not including sales tax):
• Breck’s Electric Motors $182,078.32, attached herein as Attachment 1 • Electric Motor Shop $175,871.10, attached herein as Attachment 2 • Shape Incorporated $146,000.00, attachment herein as Attachment 3 After review of the quotations received, staff recommends awarding the purchase to Shape Incorporated as the lowest responsive quote and in the best interest of the City.

The proposed equipment meets the operational requirements of the Wastewater Treatment Plant while providing the most cost-effective option among the quotations received. Given that the subject purchase is necessary for the proper operation of the new screw press that is a part of the larger CDBG-funded sewer improvements project, Staff is using the procurement thresholds for construction as identified in the City's adopted procurement policy.

Due to the critical nature of the equipment and current lead times estimated between approximately 12 to 14 weeks, staff recommends proceeding with procurement as soon as possible to minimize the risk of equipment failure and operational disruptions. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the purchase of replacement headworks influent pumps for the Wastewater Treatment Plant and award to Shape Incorporated for an amount of approximately $158,410, including sales tax.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This expense will be funded by anticipated savings in the CDBG-funded sewer improvements project, informally referred to as the "P Street Sewer Main Improvements Project'.

PUBLIC HEARING:

None
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Breck's Electric Motor Shop

2. Electric Motor Shop Inc.

3. Shape Inc.

Estimate
Date
5/11/2026
Estimate #
5013
Name / Address
City of Dinuba
405 E. El Monte Way
Dinuba, Calif.93618
Breck's Electric Motors Inc
1957 Cambridge Cir.

Tulare, Calif. 93274
P.O. No. Terms
Net 15
Phone #
559-651-1475
Fax #
559-651-1490
E-mail
[email protected]
Web Site
www.breckselectricmotors.com
Total
Subtotal
Sales Tax (8.5%)
Item Description Qty Class Total
NT 3202 Flygt NT 3202 MT3 ~641
(45hp/460v/3ph) 8" Discharge, FM
Explosion Proof, FLS, 65'
Shielded Power Cable
2 167,814.12T Retail
lead time 12-14 WEEKS
I asked if there is an expedite option.

I will let you know if there is.
$182,078.32
$167,814.12
$14,264.20

Ship To Information

WWRF WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
6675 AVE 412
DINUBA, CA 93618
Customer Information

CITY OF DINUBA
405 E. EL MONTE WAY
DINUBA, CA 93618
RFQ #:

Quote Date
5/6/2026
PO #:

Quote By: BOB LANGE
Salesperson: NATE ROLDAN
RS-RQ28137
Quote Number
001831
Customer ID
Phone: (559) 805-5510 x
Fax: (559) 591-5923 x

PABLO VELAZQUEZ
Attn cc Quote
Terms: Net 30
Quote Information
Reason Sent For Repair:

Comments:

QTY 2 45HP FLYGT SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS. APPROX 12-14 WEEKS TO SHIP PLUS TRANSIT. FREIGHT ADDITIONAL TO QUOTE.

PLEASE CONFIRM TO: BOB LANGE 559-650-1153 X 263
Nameplate Information
ID RS-M30261
Material Unit Price Ext Price
2 0032020950941 FLYGT 45HP 460V 641 IMP 3PH 8" DIS FM RATED LS 81,046.59 162,093.18 W/65FT CABLE
1 FREIGHT IN - REPAIR INBOUND FREIGHT - TO BE ADDED+ 0.00 0.00 Total for Material : 162,093.18
Total for Quote RS-RQ28137 : 175,871.10
Tax : 13,777.92
Subtotal : 162,093.18
Lead Time
Quotes exclude Sales Tax & Freight, Unless Otherwise Noted.

Not Responsible For Items Left Over 60 Days.

Quote valid for 45 days.

Warranty info available at: https://emshop.com/motor-warranty SIGNATURE: DATE:

PO# ( IF NOT ALREADY ISSUED ): Ship Via: UPS Page 1 of 1 Our Tax ID: Your Tax ID: Taxable Material 162,093.18 Taxable Labor 0.00 Sales Tax Code 1: DINUBA CITY SALES TAX

SANITATION • HYDRAULIC • AND PROCESSING EQUIPMENT

PLEASANTON SACRAMENTO STOCKTON
3825 Hopyard Road #195
Pleasanton, CA 94588
Phone (925) 485-9720
2356 Gold Meadow Way #270
Gold River, CA 95670
Phone (916) 309-4132
119 Val Dervin Parkway # 2
Stockton, CA 95206
Phone (209) 234-5909
QUOTATION Page 1 of 3
TO: City of Dinuba
1088 East Kamm
Dinuba, CA 93618
DATE: 05-21-2026
QUOTE #: 112410
DESC:

JOB: 3202 Replacement Dinuba
LOCATION:

ATTN: Estimating PHONE:

EMAIL:

WE ARE PLEASED TO QUOTE ON THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS

PRINTED ON LAST PAGE HEREOF, THESE CONDITIONS MAY BE CHANGED ONLY BY A WRITTEN STATEMENT SIGNED BY AN OFFICER OF SHAPE, INCORPORATED.
☒ F.O.B. FACTORY
☐ F.F.A. TO FIRST DESTINATION
Line
#
Qty Item Price
01 2 Flygt NT 3202.095 MT 641 Impeller, 8" Discharge
45hp 460V 3 Phase 50' Power Cable. FM, FLS,
02 1 Freight
Total for Above Equipment: $146,000.00
(Tax Rate 0.000%) Total Tax: $0.00
Grand Total: $146,000.00
Notes:

1. QUOTE IS VALID FOR 45 DAYS, See attached TOCs for details

2. Price DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY APPLICABLE TAXES

3. Price INCLUDES Freight: F.F.A.

4. Price does not include: installation, equipment unloading, pipe, conduit, anchor bolts, guide bars/rails or any other items not listed.

5. ESTIMATED EQUIPMENT LEAD TIME: A) Pumps 12-14 WEEKS B) ACCESSORIES 10-12 WEEKS SHAPE, INC.

Sean Smith - [email protected]
QUOTATION DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY SALES OR USE TAX PAYABLE UNDER ANY STATE OR FEDERAL STATURE. THIS QUOTATION PRICE IS FOR MATERIAL LISTED ABOVE. ANY

ADDITIONS OR MODIFICATIONS THAT BECOME NECESSARY FOR APPROVED SUBMITTALS, UPON AWARDING OF THIS CONTRACT, MAY RESULT IN NECESSARY PRICE CHANGES.

NOTE: ITEMS NOT SPECIFIED ON THIS QUOTATION ARE NOT INCLUDED IN OUR PRICE AND ARE TO BE SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. PRICES ARE FOR IMMEDIATE ACCEPTANCE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SALE SUBJECT TO MANUFACTURERS STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 30% RESTOCKING FEE.

SHAPE STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1

ACCEPTANCE
The following Terms and Conditions are an integral part of the offer to sell the equipment and/or services offered in this proposal. When the BUYER signifies acceptance of this quotation by submission of a Purchase Order or signed SELLER Quotation, it shall become a binding contract when accepted and signed by an authorized signer of the SELLER. Any changes or amendments to this proposal made by the BUYER must have SELLER’s approval in writing to become a part of this contract. These Terms and Conditions and the accompanying Purchase Order or signed SELLER Quotation shall comprise the entire agreement between the parties and no course of prior dealings between the parties and no usage of the trade shall be relevant to supplement or explain any terms used in this contract. Unless stated otherwise, the terms and conditions of the manufacturers listed herein will apply to this quotation Any attachments or listed documents are considered a part of this quotation and are made part of the agreement. Quote is firm for thirty (30) days unless otherwise stated on the face of the attached quotation.

APPROVAL DRAWINGS
All items listed are based on SELLER’S interpretation of the requirements in accordance with the plans and specifications. Any preliminary drawings or literature attached to our quotation are for illustration purposes only to show approximate arrangements. Specific drawings and submittal data will be furnished for approval as required after receipt and acceptance of the BUYER’S order. Any submittal or manuals when provided by SELLER will be in the form of a PDF electronic file only. Any form of media beyond the electronic file would be the responsibility of BUYER. Fabrication of products or equipment ordered will not begin until approval and direction to proceed is received in writing. No warranty is made regarding quantities, materials of construction or type of materials quoted. Operation, installation, and maintenance of materials quoted are the responsibility of the OWNER or CONTRACTOR.

DELIVERY
Any shipment or delivery date recited represents our best estimate, but no liability, direct or indirect, is assumed by SELLER for failure to ship or deliver on such dates.

Unless otherwise directed, SELLER shall have the right to make early or partial shipments and invoices covering the same to BUYER shall be due and payable in accordance with payment terms hereof. FOB shall be origin unless stated otherwise on the front of these Terms and Conditions.

Delivery schedule(s) will be contingent on supply-chain availability and variability for material components, therefore, lead-times are subject to change without notice.

Published weights are careful estimates but are not guaranteed. SELLER will endeavor, insofar, as it is possible, to comply with shipping instructions specified by the Purchaser. However, SELLER reserves the right to ship merchandise by such means of transportation as it may select. The manufacturer will ship the equipment via best way. Demurrage shall be billed to the account of the Purchaser. DAMAGE CLAIMS: Care is taken in packaging all shipments. After BUYER has been given the receipt by the transportation company, all claims for breakage or shortages, whether concealed or obvious, must be made in writing by the BUYER to the carrier and SELLER within seven (7) days after receipt of shipment. When damage or shortages are obvious, written comments on the bill of lading are required before the driver is released.. RETURNED PRODUCTS: In no instance is equipment to be returned without first obtaining SELLERS written approval and returned materials authorization.

If shipment is postponed at the request of the purchaser after manufacturing has been commenced, payment will be due on notice from us that the equipment is ready for shipment. Pro rata payments shall be made for partial shipments.

STORAGE
Any item of the product on which shipment is delayed by BUYER may be placed in storage by SELLER at BUYER’S expense and risk. If a delay in shipment is requested by BUYER after an order has been entered and accepted:
a. No charge will be made if the request for delay is made more than six (6) weeks before acknowledged shipping date and the requested delay is for a period not in excess of thirty (30) days.
b. A charge will be made if the requested delay exceeds a period of thirty (30) days or if the request is made within six (6) weeks of the acknowledged shipping date. SELLER will advise BUYER of the charge within ten (10) days of receiving BUYER’S request for delay. c. If the product is within six (6) weeks of the acknowledged shipping date, then SELLER has the option of completing, invoicing and storing the product and charging one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month, or the maximum percentage permitted by law, whichever is lesser, of the established price for such product, plus storage cost.

PAYMENT
Payment terms, upon credit approval, are of net thirty (30) days from the date of each invoice for material shipped (or when ready for shipment if shipment is deferred by BUYER) unless stated otherwise on the face of the attached quotation. Flow down provisions are not accepted and shall not be enforceable against SELLER.

Retention is not allowed. In the event any payment becomes past due, a charge of one-half percent (1.5%) will be assessed monthly. These terms are completely independent from, and not contingent upon, when BUYER receives payment from the OWNER. A processing fee of up to four percent (4%) will be added for credit card payments. All merchandise sold is subject to lien laws. Partial or final payment shall constitute acceptance of delivered materials, products, or equipment.

FORCE MAJEURE
Neither Party will be liable for any failure or delay in performing an obligation under these Terms and Conditions that is due to any of the following causes, to the extent beyond its reasonable control: acts of God, accident, riots, war, terrorist act, epidemic, pandemic, quarantine, civil commotion, breakdown of communication facilities, breakdown of web host, breakdown of internet service provider, natural catastrophes, governmental acts or omissions, changes in laws or regulations, national strikes, fire, explosion, generalized lack of availability of raw materials or energy. For the avoidance of doubt, Force Majeure shall not include (a) financial distress nor the inability of either party to make a profit or avoid a financial loss, (b) changes in market prices or conditions, or (c) a party’s financial inability to perform its obligations hereunder.

TAXES AND BONDS
Taxes and bonds are NOT included in our pricing. Any applicable taxes or bonds will be added to the price and shown separately on each invoice. All prices exclude sales, use, duties, excise, and other taxes in respect to manufacture, sale, or delivery, all of which are to be paid by the buyer unless a proper exemption certificate is furnished. BUYER agrees to reimburse our company for taxes SELLER must pay on BUYER’S behalf.

PRICE ESCALATION and/or MATERIAL DEPOSITS
If between the proposal date and actual procurement and through no fault of the SELLER, the relevant cost of labor, material, freight, brokerage fees, tariffs, and other SELLER costs combined relating to the contract increase, then the contract price shall be subject to escalation and increased accordingly. If required by the BUYER, increase shall be verified by documentation and the amount of contract price escalation shall be calculated as either the actual increased cost to the Seller or, if agreed by the Parties, the equivalent increase of a relevant industry recognized third-party index. SELLER shall undertake good faith efforts to obtain savings in its procurement of materials to avoid escalation costs. BUYER shall cooperate with SELLER in such efforts to obtain such cost savings. SELLER shall contemporaneously track any escalation costs.

CLAIMS AND BACKCHARGES
BUYER agrees to examine all materials immediately upon delivery and report to SELLER in writing any defects or shortages noted no later than ten (10) days following the date of receipt. The parties agree that if no such claim is made within said time, it shall be considered acceptable and in good order with respect to any defect or shortage which would have been revealed by such an inspection. In no event will SELLER be responsible for any charge for modification, servicing, adjustment or for any other expense without written authorization from SELLER prior to the performance of any such work. IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE TO BUYER OR

SHAPE STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2

ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOSS OF USE, REVENUE OR PROFIT, OR FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR

PUNITIVE DAMAGES, FOR ANY REASON, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF A DELAY IN OR FAILURE OF DELIVERY, DEFECTS

IN MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP AND/OR FAILURE OF GOODS TO PERFORM TO APPLICABLE SPECIFICATIONS, DRAWINGS, BLUEPRINTS OR SAMPLES AS SET FORTH OR DESCRIBED HEREIN, IF ANY, OF A BREACH BY SELLER OF ANY OTHER TERM OR OBLIGATION OF SELLER UNDER THE CONTRACT. No penalty clauses of any description will be effective unless approved in writing over the signature of a principal of SELLER. Under no circumstances shall SELLER be liable for any consequential, special or incidental damages, including liquidated damages, arising from any breach by it in this transaction, AND ALL SUCH

CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL AND INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, ARE EXCLUDED FROM ANY REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO THE BUYER.

SECURITY INTEREST & TITLE
Until all amounts due SELLER have been paid in full, SELLER shall retain a security interest in the product and have all rights of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code and applicable law, including the right to repossess the product or equipment without legal process and the right to require the BUYER to assemble the equipment and make it available to SELLER at a place reasonably convenient to both parties.

WARRANTY
Equipment and parts not manufactured by the SELLER carry only the warranty of the manufacturer of said parts. SELLER does not make any express or implied warranty for equipment and/or parts it did not manufacture. Credits for defective material and workmanship in said equipment and/or parts are only in accordance with the underlying company policy of the manufacturer. SELLER makes no warranty whatsoever with respect to any equipment and/or parts as to their merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is further agreed that the SELLER assumes no liability whatsoever for failure of equipment due to normal usage and wear.

INDEMNIFICATION
To the fullest extent permitted by the law in which the project is located, BUYER and SELLER shall indemnify and hold one another and their respective employees and agents harmless from and against all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, actions, causes of action, demands, fines, penalties, judgments, costs, and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, court costs, expert fees and costs, arising out of or resulting from BUYER’s or SELLER’s own negligent acts, omissions or misconduct, to the extent such negligence is covered by BUYER’s and SELLER’s respective insurance policies. In the event any third party asserts against SELLER a claim for patent infringement, royalties or licensing fees with respect to BUYER’s use of the products, materials, or equipment provided hereunder, BUYER agrees to indemnity SELLER for all liability damages, costs and expenses in connection therewith.

CANCELLATION
Buyer may cancel this contract only in writing signed by BUYER’s duly authorized agent and acknowledged in writing by SELLER’s duly authorized agent. Should this order be cancelled, BUYER shall be obligated to pay for the level of work performed and products shipped. Work performed includes any engineering, calculations, preparation of submittals, drawings, and/or travel to job site in relation to this order. In addition to any other remedies provided under these Terms and Conditions, SELLER may terminate this contract with immediate effect by providing signed, written notice to BUYER, if BUYER: (i) fails to pay any amount when due under the contract and such failure continues for 30 days after BUYER’s receipt of written notice of nonpayment; (ii) has not otherwise performed or complied with any of these Terms and Conditions; or (iii) becomes insolvent, files a petition for bankruptcy or commences or has commenced against it proceedings in bankruptcy, receivership, reorganization or assignment for the benefit of creditors.

FIELD WORK
Unless specifically stated on our quotation, installation, start-up service, field testing, supervision, operation, and training are not included in our pricing of product. In the event that SELLER or any of its employees or agents do perform work or services on-site at the project’s location, BUYER agrees to hold SELLER and its employees or agents harmless for any injuries or damage to property caused by their acts or omission, except to the extent said injuries or property damage arise from gross negligence or intentional misconduct.

MODIFICATIONS
This contract can be modified only in writing which specifically states that it amends these Terms and Conditions and is signed by both parties and their duly authorized agents. It is further agreed that this contract shall not be modified in any respect except in writing signed by the party and their duly authorized agent against whom the modification is sought to be enforced.

AUTHORITY OF SELLER’S AGENTS
No agent, employee or representative of the SELLER has any authority to bind the SELLER to any affirmation, representation or warranty concerning the goods sold under this Contract, and unless an affirmation, representation or warranty made by an agent, employee, or representative is specifically included within this written contract, it shall not be enforceable by the BUYER.

NO THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES
This contract is for the sole benefit of BUYER and SELLER and their respective successors and permitted assigns and nothing herein, express or implied, is intended to or shall confer upon any other person or entity any legal or equitable right, benefit, or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of these Terms and Conditions.

GOVERNING LAW
All matters arising of or relating to the contract or the Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state in which the project is located.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION
In the event of any dispute between BUYER and SELLER arising out of the terms of the contract and these Terms and Conditions, such dispute shall be decided by arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with the then-prevailing Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures of the American Arbitration Association. BUYER and SELLER mutually agree that any dispute involving claims valued at or above $1,000,000.00 shall be heard by a panel of three (3) arbitrators. The venue for all arbitration proceedings shall be the State of California. The foregoing agreement to arbitrate shall be specifically enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction. The award rendered by the arbitrators shall be final and judgment may be entered upon it in accordance with applicable law in any court of competent jurisdiction.

SEVERABILITY
The partial or complete invalidity of any one or more provisions of these Terms and Conditions shall not affect the validity or continuing force and effect of any other provision. If any provision is invalid, in whole or in part, the provision shall be considered reformed to reflect the intent thereof to the greatest extent possible consistent with applicable law.

ASSIGNMENT – DELEGATION
No right or interest in this Contract shall be assigned by the BUYER without the written permission of the SELLER, and no delegation of any obligation owed, or of the performance of any obligation by the BUYER shall be made without the written permission of the SELLER. Any attempted assignment or delegation shall be wholly void and totally ineffective for all purposes unless made in conformity with this paragraph.

City Council Staff Report
Department: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE June 9, 2026
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
By: Lupe Montejano, Billing Supervisor/Deputy City Clerk Subject: Warrant Register May 29, 2026 & June 5, 2026 (KS) RECOMMENDATION:

Council to review and approve the Warrant Register as presented.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

None.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES:

None.

DISCUSSION:

None.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

PUBLIC HEARING:

None required.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. WR 5.29.26

2. WR 6.5.26

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators
Funding 5/22/26 Miscellaneous Paid by Check #57674 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 48,480.62 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators Totals Invoices 1 $48,480.62 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing
42435 P-06 Paid by Check #57675 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 160.00 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing Totals Invoices 1 $160.00
Vendor 1753 - Alta Healthcare District
Grant Refund 2024-25 Grant Refund Paid by Check #57676 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 12,351.03 Vendor 1753 - Alta Healthcare District Totals Invoices 1 $12,351.03 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross
000443115081 Tyler 141A75193 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57679 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 356.33 000443130736 Magyar 730A75583 6/1/26-
8/31/26
Paid by Check #57678 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,382.28 000443147355 Harman 862W04709 6/1/26-
8/31/26
Paid by Check #57677 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 720.72 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross Totals Invoices 3 $2,459.33 Vendor 2300 - Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc.
1053107 DINUBA WWTP PARTS Paid by Check #57680 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 74,775.18 Vendor 2300 - Aqua-Aerobic Systems, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $74,775.18 Vendor 65 - Banner Pest Control
226590 PD - Removal of Pigeons
Downtown
Paid by Check #57681 05/05/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 75.00 226774 PD - Removal of Pigeons
Downtown
Paid by Check #57681 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 75.00 Vendor 65 - Banner Pest Control Totals Invoices 2 $150.00 Vendor 2095 - BCS Consulting, Inc.
1097 Monthly IT Service - May 2026 Paid by Check #57682 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 6,200.00 Vendor 2095 - BCS Consulting, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $6,200.00 Vendor 1679 - Bill Nelson General Engineering Construction, Inc. 251741-6 Bill Nelson 2024 CDBG Sewer
Infrastructure Improvements
Paid by Check #57683 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 128,094.94 Vendor 1679 - Bill Nelson General Engineering Construction, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $128,094.94 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates
AJ08971 COLIFORM PRESENCE/ABSENCE Paid by Check #57684 04/17/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 176.00 AJ11366 COLIFORM PRESENCE/ABSENCE Paid by Check #57684 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 162.00 AJ11176 COLIFORM PRESENCE/ABSENCE Paid by Check #57684 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 176.00 AJ11474 COLIFORM PRESENCE/ABSENCE Paid by Check #57684 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 110.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates Totals Invoices 4 $624.00
Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co.

F-041128 WWTP SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57685 04/04/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 2,358.97 F-041217 HOSE MENDER Paid by Check #57685 05/06/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 27.33 Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co. Totals Invoices 2 $2,386.30 Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc.

Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 1 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 21505 FY25/26-Comm. Srvcs.-2026
cooling maint.-Parks & Rec
Paid by Check #57686 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 1,091.50 21538 FY25/26-Sportsplex-2026 cooling
maintenance-Sportsplex
Paid by Check #57686 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 155.00 21508 FY25/26-Comm. Srvcs.-2026
cooling maint.-CPR Building
Paid by Check #57686 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 1,026.00 21555 Repairs Paid by Check #57686 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 125.00 21556 FY25/26-Senior Center-2026
cooling maintenance-Senior
Center
Paid by Check #57686 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 928.00 Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc. Totals Invoices 5 $3,325.50 Vendor 239 - City of Fresno
20010922 PD - Perishable Skills Training /
Jorge Gonzalez
Paid by Check #57687 04/02/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 623.00 Vendor 239 - City of Fresno Totals Invoices 1 $623.00
Vendor 1238 - Coleman & Horowitt, LLP
564130 General Business Paid by Check #57688 04/30/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 209.00 Vendor 1238 - Coleman & Horowitt, LLP Totals Invoices 1 $209.00 Vendor 1933 - Danny's Diesel Repair
INV-415 U-11 Paid by Check #57689 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 140.00 INV-421 u-10 Paid by Check #57689 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 140.00 INV-426 R-05 Paid by Check #57689 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 140.00 Vendor 1933 - Danny's Diesel Repair Totals Invoices 3 $420.00 Vendor 30 - Dinuba Chamber of Commerce
06011658 Annual Banquet Tickets-Two
Tickets
Paid by Check #57690 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 130.00 Vendor 30 - Dinuba Chamber of Commerce Totals Invoices 1 $130.00 Vendor 552 - Dragnet Pest Control
1283-2602-0526 FY25/26-Senior Center-pest
control services-May 2026
Paid by Check #57691 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 68.00 Vendor 552 - Dragnet Pest Control Totals Invoices 1 $68.00 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products
30175303 FY25/26-Sports-Field prep
supplies/clay
Paid by Check #57692 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 320.41 30229561 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies
Paid by Check #57692 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 321.54 30270634 FY25/26-L&L/Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-Viscaya
Paid by Check #57692 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 116.25 30270673 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-downtown
Paid by Check #57692 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 204.60 30309239 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies
Paid by Check #57692 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 192.17 30309299 FY25/26-L&L/Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-Muirfield
Paid by Check #57692 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 531.56 Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 2 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 30309460 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies
Paid by Check #57692 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 353.94 30309505 FY25/26-L&L/Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-Viscaya
Paid by Check #57692 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 85.22 30350090 FY25/26-L&L-Irrigation
parts/supplies
Paid by Check #57692 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 298.70 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products Totals Invoices 9 $2,424.39 Vendor 603 - Mario Febres
May 2026 Anthem Reimb Supp 5/1/26-
5/31/26 RX 5/1/26-4/31/27
Paid by Check #57693 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 353.60 Vendor 603 - Mario Febres Totals Invoices 1 $353.60
Vendor 2299 - Rene Emilio Gomez
SNL2026-05 FY25/26-Special EventsSNL/Summer Concerts Ent. 6/12/26
Paid by Check #57694 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 800.00 Vendor 2299 - Rene Emilio Gomez Totals Invoices 1 $800.00 Vendor 2001 - Gonzalez Pro Tree Service
05192026-01 Tree Removal & Stump Grinding Paid by Check #57695 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 3,000.00 Vendor 2001 - Gonzalez Pro Tree Service Totals Invoices 1 $3,000.00 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman
June 2026 Anthem Reimb 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57696 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 993.60 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman Totals Invoices 1 $993.60 Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security
771337 FY25/26-Senior Center-Alarm
monitoring srvc.-6/1/26-6/30/26
Paid by Check #57697 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 132.00 Vendor 1150 - Hoffman Security Totals Invoices 1 $132.00 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno
853819 PD - Copier Supplies Freight
Charges
Paid by Check #57698 05/27/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 16.75 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno Totals Invoices 1 $16.75 Vendor 974 - InfoSend, Inc.
310265 DC Manuel- Inserts 57823 May
2026
Paid by Check #57699 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 2,014.79 Vendor 974 - InfoSend, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,014.79 Vendor 1718 - JCL Company, LLC
01052346188 SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57700 01/05/2023 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 189.22 0303231049 WATER DEPT SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57700 03/03/2023 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 110.56 0829237284 SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57700 08/29/2023 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 84.68 0829237285 CREDIT Paid by Check #57700 08/29/2023 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 (68.63) 04162413201 SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57700 04/16/2024 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 90.06 04232413360 supplies Paid by Check #57700 04/23/2024 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 483.92 07082522745 SHOP SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57700 07/08/2025 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 227.85 Vendor 1718 - JCL Company, LLC Totals Invoices 7 $1,117.66 Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 3 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co.
6250982 FY25/26-Sportsplex-Fire Ext.
annual maint/service
Paid by Check #57701 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 532.86 Vendor 5 - Jorgensen & Co. Totals Invoices 1 $532.86
Vendor 281 - Law and Associates Investigations
26-061 Fraysure Paid by Check #57702 04/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 800.00 Vendor 281 - Law and Associates Investigations Totals Invoices 1 $800.00 Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California 55100386168 M-734 Paid by Check #57703 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,829.34 55100386228 M-734 Paid by Check #57703 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 99.99 55100386237 P-06 Paid by Check #57703 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 885.07 55100386295 M-735 Paid by Check #57703 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 99.95 Vendor 449 - Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California Totals Invoices 4 $2,914.35 Vendor 1723 - Matson Alarm Co, Inc.
8404563 City Hall Monitoring 06/01/26-
06/30/26
Paid by Check #57704 06/01/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 137.62 Vendor 1723 - Matson Alarm Co, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $137.62 Vendor 1181 - McCormick, Kabot & Lew
16253 General Matters February 2026 Paid by Check #57705 02/25/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 3,114.75 16255 Retainer February 2026 Paid by Check #57705 02/25/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 3,300.00 Vendor 1181 - McCormick, Kabot & Lew Totals Invoices 2 $6,414.75 Vendor 1913 - Metro Uniform & Accessories
309203 PD - Uniform / FT Melanie Flores Paid by Check #57706 05/04/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 525.12 309235 PD - Uniform / FT Keng Vang Paid by Check #57706 05/04/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 543.54 Vendor 1913 - Metro Uniform & Accessories Totals Invoices 2 $1,068.66 Vendor 1943 - Mineral King Publishing, Inc
73180 Public Notice - MVT AB 2561 Paid by Check #57707 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 180.00 18224 6/2026 Subcription renewal Human
Resources
Paid by Check #57707 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 50.00 Vendor 1943 - Mineral King Publishing, Inc Totals Invoices 2 $230.00 Vendor 589 - Rosa Montanez
May 2026 Anthem Reimb 5/1/26-5/31/26 Paid by Check #57708 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 247.82 Vendor 589 - Rosa Montanez Totals Invoices 1 $247.82
Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc.
2605296 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605297 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605326 IN-HOUSE Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 94.00 2605327 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605328 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605329 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 106.00 2605426 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605427 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 106.00 Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 4 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 2605435 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57709 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 181.00 2605446 IN-HOUSE Paid by Check #57709 05/15/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 267.00 2605668 IN-HOUSE Paid by Check #57709 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 259.00 2605724 IN-HOUSE Paid by Check #57709 05/21/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 720.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc. Totals Invoices 12 $2,638.00 Vendor 88 - Municipal Maintenance Equipment Inc.
049242 U-04 Paid by Check #57710 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 209.30 Vendor 88 - Municipal Maintenance Equipment Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $209.30 Vendor 142 - ODP Business Solutions, LLC
464513146002 HR folders Paid by Check #57711 05/04/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 31.32 468752332001 FY25/26-Mult. Div-Operating
supplies-CS/Parks/YS
Paid by Check #57711 05/06/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 158.25 469797629001 Senior Center Receipt Books Paid by Check #57711 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 236.44 Vendor 142 - ODP Business Solutions, LLC Totals Invoices 3 $426.01 Vendor 954 - Office Overload Printing
19729 Inspection Forms Paid by Check #57742 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 219.80 Vendor 954 - Office Overload Printing Totals Invoices 1 $219.80 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera
June 2026 Anthem Reimb 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57712 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 349.64 Vendor 1708 - James Olvera Totals Invoices 1 $349.64
Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
4475716051805/26 180 W Merced STE A Paid by Check #57725 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 668.84 7681012419805/26 180 W Merced STE C Paid by Check #57723 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 126.78 9750865237305/26 180 W Merced STE B Paid by Check #57724 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 35.25 1693144969405/26 Parks- N/KAMM E/Green 04/09/26
-05/07/26
Paid by Check #57714 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 11.46 1557710974505/26 Parks 1851 E Kamm Ave 04/10/26
-05/10/26
Paid by Check #57713 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 2,610.40 5751498437605/26 Parks 139 N K St 04/10/26-
05/10/26
Paid by Check #57716 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 55.15 6021181187605/26 Sportsplex 201 N URUAPAN WAY
04/10/26-05/10/26
Paid by Check #57717 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,927.48 8319024072705/26 Parks SW SW 16-16-24 04/10/26-
05/10/26
Paid by Check #57718 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 17.73 61830544740 5/26 496 E TULARE ST 4/10/26-
5/10/26
Paid by Check #57722 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,401.13 4323390246905/26 L & L CITRUS HEIGHTS VENTURA
AND O 04/16/26-05/14/26
Paid by Check #57715 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 77.49 8543598174205/26 L & L 04/16/26-05/14/26 Paid by Check #57719 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 250.16 9018373735305/26 L & L DUNMORE HOMES VISCAYA
1 AT SAGINA 04/16/26-05/14/26
Paid by Check #57720 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,140.56 9196176758805/26 L & L SIERRA WAY AND BUENA
VISTA AVE 04/16/26-05/14/26
Paid by Check #57721 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 114.19 Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 5 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 3166578419005/26 3007 W Kamm Ave 04/17/26-
05/17/26
Paid by Check #57726 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 87.79 5949665550305/26 6675 AVE 412 04/17/26-05/17/26 Paid by Check #57727 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 42,700.81 8866956432505/26 NW SE SW 18 16 24 04/17/26-
05/17/26
Paid by Check #57728 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 25.81 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 16 $51,251.03 Vendor 2241 - Public Safety Communications Association
000025 PD - Taking the Call Training /
Josiah Landeros
Paid by Check #57729 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 60.00 Vendor 2241 - Public Safety Communications Association Totals Invoices 1 $60.00 Vendor 2107 - Rat Incorporated
INV/2026/5390 FY25/26-Special Events-SNL-1
month-portable restroom rentals
Paid by Check #57730 05/27/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/27/2026 05/29/2026 400.00 Vendor 2107 - Rat Incorporated Totals Invoices 1 $400.00 Vendor 221 - Rene G. Ortega Concrete
2207 393 Ramblewood Paid by Check #57731 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 5,850.00 2208 388 Ramblewood Drive Paid by Check #57731 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 11,150.00 2210 1432 Villa Ave Paid by Check #57731 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 4,365.00 Vendor 221 - Rene G. Ortega Concrete Totals Invoices 3 $21,365.00 Vendor 2204 - Reptile Ron Animal Presentations Incorporated 2713 FY25/26-Youth Services-Summer
Fun Program Presentation
Paid by Check #57732 04/27/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 300.00 Vendor 2204 - Reptile Ron Animal Presentations Incorporated Totals Invoices 1 $300.00 Vendor 2177 - Rise Above Fire Training & Tools, LLC
G26-0518 Equipment Paid by Check #57733 05/18/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,040.50 Vendor 2177 - Rise Above Fire Training & Tools, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $1,040.50 Vendor 1886 - Schlegel, Timothy
FFI & FFII Educational Reimbursement Paid by Check #57734 02/22/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 500.00 ACLS Skills 2026 Reimbursement Paid by Check #57734 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 178.00 CPR Cards Reimbursement for Rec. Cards Paid by Check #57734 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 390.00 Vendor 1886 - Schlegel, Timothy Totals Invoices 3 $1,068.00 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties
194349 FY25/26-Parks-Repair &
maintenance supplies
Paid by Check #57735 04/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 187.73 194538 FY25/26-Parks-Striping paintCinco de Mayo event suppliesPaid by Check #57735 04/28/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 819.74 Vendor 42 - Scout Specialties Totals Invoices 2 $1,007.47 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises
DIN21SL MAR2026 Sewer Lateral General Admin
March 2026
Paid by Check #57736 04/24/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 348.50 DIN21SL APR2026 Sewer Lateral General Admin April
2026
Paid by Check #57736 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 385.96 Vendor 46 - Self Help Enterprises Totals Invoices 2 $734.46 Vendor 2214 - Standard Insurance Company
Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 6 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 10986819 6/1/2026-7/1/2026 Paid by Check #57737 05/11/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 685.76 Vendor 2214 - Standard Insurance Company Totals Invoices 1 $685.76 Vendor 940 - Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
183891728-0001 EQUIPMENT RENTAL Paid by Check #57738 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,086.76 Vendor 940 - Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $1,086.76 Vendor 1442 - Superior Pool Products, LLC
Q2034725 SUPPLIES WWTP Paid by Check #57739 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,821.65 Vendor 1442 - Superior Pool Products, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $1,821.65 Vendor 2292 - SWConstruction, inc.
23533-2 SW Construction Entertainment
Plaza Beautification Project #2
Paid by Check #57740 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 130,074.81 Vendor 2292 - SWConstruction, inc. Totals Invoices 1 $130,074.81 Vendor 1447 - Monte Sylvester
June 2026 Anthem Reimb 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57741 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 338.50 Vendor 1447 - Monte Sylvester Totals Invoices 1 $338.50 Vendor 426 - Tioga Solar Dinuba LLC
1060501859 Tioga Solar 03/01/2026-
03/31/2026
Paid by Check #57743 03/31/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 41,315.56 Vendor 426 - Tioga Solar Dinuba LLC Totals Invoices 1 $41,315.56 Vendor 1953 - Ed Todd
April 2026 Anthem Reimb 4/1/26-4/30/26 Paid by Check #57744 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,301.22 Vendor 1953 - Ed Todd Totals Invoices 1 $1,301.22
Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center
2089 PD - K9 Maintenance Training /
Enzo & Zeus
Paid by Check #57745 05/25/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 180.00 Vendor 311 - Top Dog Training Center Totals Invoices 1 $180.00 Vendor 658 - Eric Trevino
15 Years Service Award 2021 Paid by Check #57746 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 150.00 Vendor 658 - Eric Trevino Totals Invoices 1 $150.00
Vendor 49 - Tulare County
22123 PD - Engraved Plaque / Karla
Alvarez
Paid by Check #57747 05/13/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 36.89 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 1 $36.89
Vendor 154 - USA Bluebook
INV01050787 LOCK MODEL Paid by Check #57748 05/19/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 790.70 Vendor 154 - USA Bluebook Totals Invoices 1 $790.70
Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless
6143035181 Verizon pw Paid by Check #57749 05/07/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 1,364.95 6143481881 Apr/May 2026 Paid by Check #57751 05/12/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 460.32 6143597064 FY25/26-Mult. Div-Cell phones
services-4/15-5/14
Paid by Check #57750 05/14/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 1,174.11 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless Totals Invoices 3 $2,999.38 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC
Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 7 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/24/26 - 05/29/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 5031725273 FY25/26-Parks-Uniform Allowance
- Parks staff-Wk. of 5/20/26
Paid by Check #57752 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/26/2026 05/29/2026 79.84 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC Totals Invoices 1 $79.84 Vendor 820 - Vulcan Materials Company
6397951 ASPHALT Paid by Check #57753 05/08/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 675.82 Vendor 820 - Vulcan Materials Company Totals Invoices 1 $675.82 Vendor Amalia Vargas
Rfnd-Vargas-Nebr FY25/26-CS-Park rental refundNebraska Park 7/11/26Paid by Check #57754 05/20/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/22/2026 05/29/2026 100.00 Vendor Amalia Vargas Totals Invoices 1 $100.00
Grand Totals Invoices 131 $566,361.85
Run by Anali Guerrero on 05/29/2026 09:54:54 AM Page 8 of 8

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 367 - A-1 Alternative Fuel Systems / A-1 Auto Electric 203078 t-20 Paid by Check #57755 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 400.68 Vendor 367 - A-1 Alternative Fuel Systems / A-1 Auto Electric Totals Invoices 1 $400.68 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators
Funding 5/29/26 Miscellaneous Paid by Check #57756 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 16,282.21 Vendor 263 - Advantek Benefit Administrators Totals Invoices 1 $16,282.21 Vendor 1036 - Allstar Fire Equipment
272596 New Engine Equipment Paid by Check #57757 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 197.73 Vendor 1036 - Allstar Fire Equipment Totals Invoices 1 $197.73 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing
42441 P-07 Paid by Check #57758 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 195.00 Vendor 522 - Allstar Towing Totals Invoices 1 $195.00
Vendor 20 - Ameritas Life Insurance
5/01/26-5/31/26 010-007745-00000 Paid by Check #57759 05/12/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 25,641.44 Vendor 20 - Ameritas Life Insurance Totals Invoices 1 $25,641.44 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross
000443142897 Sano 097M84206 6/1/26-8/31/26 Paid by Check #57760 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,327.98 000443158096 Hartley 925M97595 6/1/26-
6/30/26
Paid by Check #57761 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 390.70 Vendor 351 - Anthem Blue Cross Totals Invoices 2 $1,718.68 Vendor 1513 - Barnes Welding Supply
0091748519 supplies Paid by Check #57762 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 52.63 0091752447 SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57762 05/31/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 52.63 Vendor 1513 - Barnes Welding Supply Totals Invoices 2 $105.26 Vendor 1814 - Bogie's Pump Systems, Inc.
20741 Bogie- Supplies Paid by Check #57763 04/09/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 704.09 Vendor 1814 - Bogie's Pump Systems, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $704.09 Vendor 822 - Boundtree Medical LLC
86211590 Supplies Paid by Check #57764 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 292.98 86220288 Supplies Paid by Check #57764 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 695.71 86220289 Supplies Paid by Check #57764 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 163.10 Vendor 822 - Boundtree Medical LLC Totals Invoices 3 $1,151.79 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates
AJ12488 COLIFORM PRESENCE/ABSENCE Paid by Check #57765 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 Vendor 116 - BSK Associates Totals Invoices 1 $181.00
Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co.

F-040931 WWTP SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57766 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 263.07 Vendor 1192 - California Industrial Rubber Co. Totals Invoices 1 $263.07 Vendor 563 - John Carrillo
June 2026 Anthem Reimb 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57767 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 325.67 Vendor 563 - John Carrillo Totals Invoices 1 $325.67
Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc.

Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 1 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 21581 FY25/26-Senior Center-repair &
maint.-Repair A/C unit-Bingo
Room
Paid by Check #57768 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 2,250.00 Vendor 305 - Cartozian Air Conditioning and Heating Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $2,250.00 Vendor 896 - Central Valley Refrigeration, Inc.
69387 PD - Ice Machine
Repairs/Maintenance
Paid by Check #57769 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 749.95 Vendor 896 - Central Valley Refrigeration, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $749.95 Vendor 274 - Code Publishing Company
GCI0019937 Municipal Code- Web Update New
Pages
Paid by Check #57770 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 367.50 Vendor 274 - Code Publishing Company Totals Invoices 1 $367.50 Vendor 170 - Comcast
0191269 05/22/26 201 N Uruapan Way 05/27/26-
06/26/26
Paid by Check #57771 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 390.68 0136611 05/26/26 PD - 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #57772 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 139.18 0002177 05/27/26 1390 E Elizabeth Way 06/01/26-
06/30/26
Paid by Check #57773 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 91.45 0181138 05/27/26 180 W Merced St 06/02/26-
07/01/26
Paid by Check #57774 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 922.75 Vendor 170 - Comcast Totals Invoices 4 $1,544.06
Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer
C27045 FRONT DESK ENVELOPES Paid by Check #57775 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 949.38 Vendor 232 - Courier Printing and Village Printer Totals Invoices 1 $949.38 Vendor 1992 - Melvin R Cox
175908 Mel Cox shopping carts APRIL
2026
Paid by Check #57776 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 580.00 175909 Mel Cox shopping carts MAY 2026 Paid by Check #57776 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 460.00 Vendor 1992 - Melvin R Cox Totals Invoices 2 $1,040.00
Vendor 1782 - Marleen Cruz
Tuit.Reim25/26-3 FY 25/26 Tuition Reimbursement
01/12/26-05/22/26
Paid by Check #57777 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 336.58 Vendor 1782 - Marleen Cruz Totals Invoices 1 $336.58
Vendor 77 - Department of Justice
048735 PD - Blood Alcohol Analysis / April
2026
Paid by Check #57778 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 140.00 Vendor 77 - Department of Justice Totals Invoices 1 $140.00 Vendor 309 - Elbert Distributing
26257640 inventory Paid by Check #57779 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 498.21 Vendor 309 - Elbert Distributing Totals Invoices 1 $498.21 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products
30346803 FY25/26-L/L & Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-Nebraska Park
Paid by Check #57780 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 307.34 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 2 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 30385100 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-downtown
Paid by Check #57780 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 98.99 30428284 FY25/26-L&L/Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies-Parkside
Paid by Check #57780 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 341.02 30433758 FY25/26-Parks-Irrigation
parts/supplies
Paid by Check #57780 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 381.25 Vendor 36 - Ewing Irrigation Products Totals Invoices 4 $1,128.60 Vendor 1954 - Fahrney Buick GMC
47994 M-736 Paid by Check #57781 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 143.64 47999 m-736 Paid by Check #57781 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.31 Vendor 1954 - Fahrney Buick GMC Totals Invoices 2 $324.95 Vendor 2011 - Guerrero, Anali
Tuit.Reim25/26-2 FY 25/26 Tuition Reimbursement
01/12/26-05/22/26
Paid by Check #57782 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 278.25 Vendor 2011 - Guerrero, Anali Totals Invoices 1 $278.25 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman
Apr-June 2026 Anthem Reimb 4/1/26-6/30/26 RX Paid by Check #57783 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 496.20 Vendor 1431 - Patricia Hartman Totals Invoices 1 $496.20 Vendor 139 - Henry Schein Inc.
57514787 Supplies Paid by Check #57784 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,406.40 57514788 Supplies Paid by Check #57784 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 455.87 Vendor 139 - Henry Schein Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $1,862.27 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno
855060 PD - Copier Freight Supplies
Charges
Paid by Check #57785 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 16.75 Vendor 1721 - Image 2000 Fresno Totals Invoices 1 $16.75 Vendor 1718 - JCL Company, LLC
05192628590 SHOP TOOL Paid by Check #57786 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 68.08 Vendor 1718 - JCL Company, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $68.08 Vendor 6 - Jim Manning Dodge Inc.
170425DOR PD-05 Paid by Check #57787 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 34.56 Vendor 6 - Jim Manning Dodge Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $34.56 Vendor 796 - L.N. Curtis & Sons
INV1071393 New Engine Equipment Paid by Check #57788 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 3,039.88 Vendor 796 - L.N. Curtis & Sons Totals Invoices 1 $3,039.88 Vendor 2198 - LKQ Corporation
175534480 PD WHEEL Paid by Check #57789 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 624.43 Vendor 2198 - LKQ Corporation Totals Invoices 1 $624.43 Vendor 2179 - Logan Bros Pump & Ag, INC
260232 Logan-Well 15 Epoxy Coat Paid by Check #57790 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 5,531.03 Vendor 2179 - Logan Bros Pump & Ag, INC Totals Invoices 1 $5,531.03 Vendor 1873 - Medallion Supply, Inc
Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 3 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 9130-1141440 aerator #3 @ a-basin cord
replace
Paid by Check #57791 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 4,331.32 Vendor 1873 - Medallion Supply, Inc Totals Invoices 1 $4,331.32 Vendor 1797 - David Mendoza
May 2026 Anthem Reimb 5/1/26-5/31/26 Paid by Check #57792 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 399.00 Vendor 1797 - David Mendoza Totals Invoices 1 $399.00
Vendor 1943 - Mineral King Publishing, Inc
73179 FY25/26-Comm.Srvcs.-Public
Notice-Parks operating hours
Paid by Check #57793 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 320.00 73181 Ord No. 2026-06 Summary Paid by Check #57793 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 460.00 73384 FY26/27-Public Notice- MVT 470-
22 Adoption of the 2026-27
Budget
Paid by Check #57793 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 170.00 73385 FY 26/27-Public Notice to Adopt
City's L & L's Districts
Paid by Check #57793 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,310.00 Vendor 1943 - Mineral King Publishing, Inc Totals Invoices 4 $2,260.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc.
2605770 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 106.00 2605771 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 2605988 CITY WELLS Paid by Check #57794 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 125.00 2605989 IN-HOUSE Paid by Check #57794 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 102.00 2606083 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 106.00 2606085 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 2606087 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 2606088 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 2606099 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 2606100 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 106.00 2606114 INDUSTRIAL Paid by Check #57794 05/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 181.00 Vendor 22 - Moore Twining Associates Inc. Totals Invoices 11 $1,631.00 Vendor 1570 - Mountain Valley Environmental Services, Inc. 7014 mountain valley Chief plant
operator services June 2026
Paid by Check #57795 05/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 4,871.70 7096 FY 26/27 mountain valley Chief
plant operator services July 2026
Paid by Check #57795 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 4,871.70 Vendor 1570 - Mountain Valley Environmental Services, Inc. Totals Invoices 2 $9,743.40 Vendor 884 - Napa Auto Parts
133659 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 6.87 133683 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 744.11 133689 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 355.87 133715 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 138.11 133728 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 (40.13) 133810 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 259.05 133826 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 140.94 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 4 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 133897 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 31.37 133902 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 34.68 133920 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 17.32 133926 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 22.29 134159 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 38.42 134181 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/12/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 129.86 134238 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 45.09 134249 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 45.61 134280 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 48.21 134296 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 50.82 134297 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 13.01 134332 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 247.92 134347 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 (125.18) 134350 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 68.11 134404 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 137.59 134454 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 36.73 134455 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 122.67 134557 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 58.32 134579 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 12.95 134598 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 160.79 134606 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 (63.44) 134607 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 (76.98) 134608 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 125.76 134612 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 124.45 134641 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 58.55 134766 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 6.87 134805 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 261.49 134819 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 29.28 134831 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 361.97 134832 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 91.07 134918 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 7.89 134935 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 246.82 134958 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 183.95 134960 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 7.01 134961 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 218.46 134979 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 151.89 135030 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 24.40 135039 Vehicles Paid by Check #57796 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 12.90 Vendor 884 - Napa Auto Parts Totals Invoices 45 $4,573.74 Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts
3641-337159 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 04/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 27.49 3641-337319 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 93.09 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 5 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 3641-337421 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 36.84 3641-337422 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 04/30/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 36.84 3641-337514 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 14.75 3641-337519 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 105.32 3641-337556 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 60.81 3641-337560 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 376.81 3641-338148 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 104.64 3641-338383 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 199.91 3641-338465 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 41.22 3641-338593 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 70.36 3641-338634 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 98.43 3641-338644 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 102.65 3641-338690 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 27.23 3641-338720 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 29.85 3641-338722 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 (29.85) 3641-338723 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/06/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 29.85 3641-338868 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/07/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 11.26 3641-339634 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 43.56 3641-339657 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 18.40 3641-339667 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/11/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 48.05 3641-340070 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 92.03 3641-340503 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 28.48 3641-340988 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 58.93 3641-341000 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 7.80 3641-341192 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 13.83 3641-341217 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 9.29 3641-341268 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 36.84 3641-341310 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 17.41 3641-341469 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 95.49 3641-341493 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 117.28 3641-341637 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 273.24 3641-341769 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 39.54 3641-342655 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 212.48 3641-342707 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 36.00 3641-342849 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 138.89 3641-342884 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 28.25 3641-342993 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 46.17 3641-343075 Vehicles Paid by Check #57797 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 207.50 Vendor 392 - O'Reilly Auto Parts Totals Invoices 40 $3,006.96 Vendor 142 - ODP Business Solutions, LLC
468589289001 odp supplies Paid by Check #57798 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 55.83 468590188001 odp supplies Paid by Check #57798 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 9.75 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 6 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 470057664001 FY25/26-Mult. Div.-
Office/operating supplies
Paid by Check #57798 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/26/2026 06/05/2026 262.00 Vendor 142 - ODP Business Solutions, LLC Totals Invoices 3 $327.58 Vendor 781 - Omega Industrial Supply Inc.
169522 Omega- Supplies Paid by Check #57799 04/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 968.70 Vendor 781 - Omega Industrial Supply Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $968.70 Vendor 836 - OPTERRA Energy Services, LLC
90081484 repairs to solar connection Paid by Check #57800 05/12/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 9,699.56 Vendor 836 - OPTERRA Energy Services, LLC Totals Invoices 1 $9,699.56 Vendor 1773 - Pace Supply Corp.
1911442051 supplies Paid by Check #57801 05/21/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 224.39 Vendor 1773 - Pace Supply Corp. Totals Invoices 1 $224.39 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric
0915078178005/26 PW-Various 04/16/26-05/14/26 Paid by Check #57804 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,767.72 7232679737905/26 PW-Various 04/16/26-05/14/26 Paid by Check #57805 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 17,359.62 0008518099-0 2099 W SIERRA WAY B April 2026 Paid by Check #57803 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 201.70 6402990649805/26 PD - 04/17/2026 - 05/17/2026
Billing Charges
Paid by Check #57806 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 86.74 5022214690905/26 L & L PARKSIDE VILLAGE PHASE
I 04/22/26-05/20/26
Paid by Check #57802 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 258.31 Vendor 76 - Pacific Gas & Electric Totals Invoices 5 $19,674.09 Vendor 366 - PBM Supply & Mfg., Inc
INV/2026/14849 WWTP SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57807 05/04/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 258.48 Vendor 366 - PBM Supply & Mfg., Inc Totals Invoices 1 $258.48 Vendor 2195 - Miguel A Pelayo
0000051 Discing at multiple city owned
locations
Paid by Check #57808 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 750.00 Vendor 2195 - Miguel A Pelayo Totals Invoices 1 $750.00 Vendor 207 - Polydene Inc.
2028480 clarifloc we-2563 Paid by Check #57809 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 10,589.90 Vendor 207 - Polydene Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $10,589.90 Vendor 1944 - Quadient, Inc
62797371 POSTAGE MACHINE METER
RENTAL
Paid by Check #57810 04/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 630.60 Vendor 1944 - Quadient, Inc Totals Invoices 1 $630.60
Vendor 688 - Rogelio Ramirez
May 2026 Anthem Reimb 5/1/26-5/31/26 Paid by Check #57811 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 372.32 Vendor 688 - Rogelio Ramirez Totals Invoices 1 $372.32
Vendor 349 - Rescom Pest Control
290715999 PD - WWTP Kennels Pest Control
Service
Paid by Check #57812 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 48.00 Vendor 349 - Rescom Pest Control Totals Invoices 1 $48.00 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West
Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 7 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount 038597 ALEX ALDAZ 2ND PAIR OF
BOOTS FY 25/26
Paid by Check #57813 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 200.00 Vendor 1677 - Rodeo Wild West Totals Invoices 1 $200.00 Vendor 690 - Richard Smith
RICHARD80 REIMBURSMENT FOR DIESEL

FUEL PURCHASED FOR BACKHOE
Paid by Check #57814 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 80.00 Vendor 690 - Richard Smith Totals Invoices 1 $80.00
Vendor 911 - State Controller's Office
1434788 2025 Unclaimed Property Remit Report
07/01/2021-06/30/2022
Paid by Check #57815 11/20/2025 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 703.26 Vendor 911 - State Controller's Office Totals Invoices 1 $703.26 Vendor 121 - State of California
REF 22-119 Refund 22-119 Paid by Check #57816 06/03/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 397.47 Vendor 121 - State of California Totals Invoices 1 $397.47 Vendor 214 - Stericycle, Inc.
8014308201 May 2026 Paid by Check #57817 05/18/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 172.58 Vendor 214 - Stericycle, Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $172.58 Vendor 1447 - Monte Sylvester
June 2026 RX Anthem Reimb 6/1/26-6/30/26 Paid by Check #57818 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 170.00 Vendor 1447 - Monte Sylvester Totals Invoices 1 $170.00 Vendor 92 - Target Specialty Products
INVP502153929 TARGET SPECIALTIES SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57819 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,933.87 INVP502153933 SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57819 05/13/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 2,158.74 INVP502166155 TARGET SPECIALTIES SUPPLIES Paid by Check #57819 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 377.83 INVP502166156 target specialties landscape and
aquatic
Paid by Check #57819 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 2,158.74 Vendor 92 - Target Specialty Products Totals Invoices 4 $6,629.18 Vendor 2066 - Terminix Commercial
472217447 PD - Pest Control Service Paid by Check #57820 05/19/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 96.43 Vendor 2066 - Terminix Commercial Totals Invoices 1 $96.43 Vendor 866 - The Flower Box
FB602 PD - Sympathy Plants Delivery
Service / Diaz & Nunez
Paid by Check #57821 06/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 247.83 Vendor 866 - The Flower Box Totals Invoices 1 $247.83
Vendor 1953 - Ed Todd
May 2026 Anthem Reimb 5/1/26-5/31/26 Paid by Check #57822 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,301.22 Vendor 1953 - Ed Todd Totals Invoices 1 $1,301.22
Vendor 329 - Townsend Public Affairs
25426 Consulting June 2026 Paid by Check #57823 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 6,500.00 Vendor 329 - Townsend Public Affairs Totals Invoices 1 $6,500.00 Vendor 2117 - TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, INC. 210720-202605-1 PD - Monthly Service / Account ID
210720
Paid by Check #57824 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 108.00 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 8 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor 2117 - TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, INC. Totals Invoices 1 $108.00 Vendor 49 - Tulare County
260462 PD - Detention Facility Paid by Check #57825 05/02/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 452.00 22135 vinyl sign Paid by Check #57826 05/15/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 108.50 26562 PD - 72-Hr Assessment Forms Paid by Check #57839 05/20/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 753.15 Vendor 49 - Tulare County Totals Invoices 3 $1,313.65
Vendor 307 - Tulare County Consolidated Ambulance Dispatch, Inc 26-06-07 May 2026 Paid by Check #57827 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 9,814.75 Vendor 307 - Tulare County Consolidated Ambulance Dispatch, Inc Totals Invoices 1 $9,814.75 Vendor 296 - Tulare Kings Veterinary Emergency
264210 PD - Vet Service Fees Paid by Check #57828 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 156.18 Vendor 296 - Tulare Kings Veterinary Emergency Totals Invoices 1 $156.18 Vendor 273 - US Bank
8193723 City of Dinuba Safe Drinking
Water State Revolving FD
Paid by Check #57830 05/22/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 1,375.00 582987517 CH Copier Charges Paid by Check #57829 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 2,578.21 Vendor 273 - US Bank Totals Invoices 2 $3,953.21
Vendor 2246 - US Bank Voyager Fleet Systems
8693601312622 FY 25/26 Parks-PW CNG Fuel May
2026
Paid by Check #57831 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 2,127.81 Vendor 2246 - US Bank Voyager Fleet Systems Totals Invoices 1 $2,127.81 Vendor 1434 - Vast Networks
75744 06/01/26-06/30/26 Internet SIP
Trunks 30
Paid by Check #57832 06/01/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 5,161.80 Vendor 1434 - Vast Networks Totals Invoices 1 $5,161.80 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless
6143597063 verizon admin Paid by Check #57836 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 267.75 6143597065 April/May 2026 Paid by Check #57835 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 525.54 6143597066 HR/Finance 04/15/26-05/14/26 Paid by Check #57833 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 166.58 6143597067 CMO/Council 04/15/26-05/14/26 Paid by Check #57834 05/14/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 267.35 Vendor 354 - Verizon Wireless Totals Invoices 4 $1,227.22 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC
5031729151 FY25/26-Parks-Uniform Allowance
- Parks staff-Wk. of 5/27/26
Paid by Check #57837 05/27/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 05/28/2026 06/05/2026 59.75 Vendor 21 - Vestis Services LLC Totals Invoices 1 $59.75 Vendor 2062 - W & E Electric
2604021 ROOSEVELT PARK REPLACED

BROKEN LB WITH FLEX
Paid by Check #57838 04/17/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 328.18 Vendor 2062 - W & E Electric Totals Invoices 1 $328.18
Vendor Reliable Energy Management Inc.

REFReliableEne26 Building Permit Refund 2026-
00000160
Paid by Check #57840 05/29/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 06/05/2026 135.34 Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 9 of 10

Accounts Payable Invoice Report
G/L Date Range 05/31/26 - 06/05/26
Report By Vendor - Invoice
Summary Listing
Invoice Number Invoice Description Status Held Reason Invoice Date Due Date G/L Date Received Date Payment Date Invoice Net Amount Vendor Reliable Energy Management Inc. Totals Invoices 1 $135.34 Grand Totals Invoices 197 $178,820.20
Run by Anali Guerrero on 06/04/2026 02:49:21 PM Page 10 of 10

City Council Staff Report
Department: POLICE SERVICES June 9, 2026
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Abel Iriarte, Police Chief
By: Thaddeus Ashford, Lieutenant
Subject: Military Equipment Use Annual Report (AB 481) (AI) RECOMMENDATION:

Council to receive public comment concerning the annual report and the funding, acquisition, and use of the equipment; review and renew DPD Policy 705 - Military Equipment; review the AB 481 Military Equipment Annual Reports for 2025; and by opting not to modify or rescind, affirm Ordinance No. 2022-05.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom approved Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) requiring California Law Enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a Military Equipment Use Policy by their applicable governing body (City Council) prior to taking certain actions related to the funding, acquisition, or use of controlled equipment.

Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, and use of controlled equipment (Military Equipment) within its jurisdiction if the equipment meets specific standards. The Controlled Equipment Use Policy and the Annual Controlled Equipment Use Report are subject to annual review to affirm the criteria outlined in Assembly Bill 481 have been met.

The format of this report was crafted in a manner that conforms to the statutorily required annual report pursuant to California Government Code section 7072(a) to include the following information:
1) A summary of the military equipment uses and purposes; 2) A summary of any complaints or concerns regarding military equipment; 3) The results of any internal audits, information on any violations, and actions taken in response;
4) The total annual cost for each type of equipment;
5) The quantity possessed of each type of equipment;
6) The intent to acquire additional equipment and quantity sought.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES:

None.

DISCUSSION:

On September 30, 2021, the Governor of the State of California approved Assembly Bill 481, requiring law enforcement agencies to obtain the approval of the applicable governing body by adopting a military equipment use policy. The Department is required to seek City Council approval of their military equipment use procedure by ordinance, at a regular open meeting prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined. The bill allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets specified standards.

Assembly Bill 481 requires law enforcement agencies to submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:

For clarification, AB 481 does not permit the City to utilize aircraft vessels or vehicles that inherently contain weaponry; crew-served/large caliber (.50 or greater) weapons and ammunition; military uniforms; and explosives or pyrotechnics of any kind. A copy of the annual report on controlled equipment is enclosed as Attachment 'A'.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

PUBLIC HEARING:

Required per AB 481/Government Code 7070 and for City Council to approve the City of Dinuba’s Police Department to continue to use equipment designated as “Military Equipment” according to AB 481.

A public hearing notice was published in the Mid-Valley Times on May 7, 2026.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. AB481 Annual Reporting 2025

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Executive Summary
On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom approved Assembly Bill 481 requiring California Law Enforcement agencies to obtain approval of a Military Equipment Use Policy by their applicable governing body (City Council) prior to taking certain actions related to the funding, acquisition, or use of controlled equipment.

Assembly Bill 481 allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, and use of controlled equipment (“Military Equipment”) within its jurisdiction if the equipment meets specific standards. The Controlled Equipment Use Policy and an Annual Controlled Equipment Use Report is subject to annual review to affirm the criteria outlined in Assembly Bill 481 have been met.

The format of this report was crafted in a manner that conforms to the statutorily required annual report pursuant to California Government Code section 7072(a) to include the following information:
1) A summary of the military equipment uses and purposes; 2) A summary of any complaints or concerns concerning the military equipment; 3) The results of any internal audits, information on any violations, and actions taken in response;
4) The total annual cost for each type of equipment;
5) The quantity possessed of each type of equipment;
6) The intent to acquire additional equipment and quantity sought. ***Unless otherwise noted, the funds for equipment, staff costs, training costs, or costs for the use of the equipment, is from the approved existing budget. Tuition costs for outside training courses, even if included in the existing budget, will be noted in the total annual outside training cost section.***
The Dinuba Police Department recognizes the public’s ongoing interest in how controlled equipment is used to protect our community and is committed to maintaining our community’s trust in providing professional and responsive police services. As such, the Dinuba Police Department has authored the following comprehensive Annual Controlled Equipment Use Report to remain transparent with our community and in accordance with the annual reporting requirements set forth by applicable California Law.

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Controlled Equipment Categories
Assembly Bill 481 created Government Code 7070 which designated 15 categories of items deemed “military” or more accurately defined as controlled equipment. • Category 1: Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Category 2: Mine-resistant, ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
• Category 3: High-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored allterrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from the subdivision.
• Category 4: Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion. • Category 5: Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Category 6: Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Category 7: Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
• Category 8: Firearms of .50-caliber or greater. However, standard-issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
• Category 9: Ammunition of .50-caliber or greater. However, standard-issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision. • Category 10: Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50-caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard-issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50-caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a State agency.

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 • Category 11: Any Firearm or Firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
• Category 12: “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas”, and “pepper balls”, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray. • Category 13: Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the LongRange Acoustic Device (LRAD). • Category 14: The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions:
40-millimeter projectile launchers, “bean bag”, rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
• Category 15: Any other equipment as determined by the governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Type DUI Trailer Command Post (Category 5)
Description 2003, Ultra Hauler 18’ Enclosed, 2 axle Cargo Trailer Quantity 1
Capabilities The DUI mobile command trailer can also be utilized for other critical incidents, preplanned large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events.

Expected lifespan The mobile command trailer, 20‐year lifespan on chassis and vehicle structure. Upgrades may be needed in 7 years to maintain IT systems.

Manufacturer's
description
18' enclosed 2 axle cargo trailer
Purpose and
authorized uses
Primarily a DUI Trailer to be used based on DUI checkpoints. Can be utilized under specific circumstances of a given critical incident, large event, natural disaster or community event that is taking place.

Fiscal impact Annual maintenance cost of approximately $1,000.00 a year Legal and
procedural rules
It is the policy of the Department to use the DUI mobile command trailer only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.

Required training The driver/operator shall receive training in the safe handling of the trailer, and must have prior experience in pulling a trailer.

Compliance
mechanisms
Operational use under the review of the Operation Division Lieutenant, on-duty Watch Commander or appropriate team supervisor and governed under Dinuba Police Department Policy 703‐Vehicle Use.

Use Reporting
2025
Used 4 times as a command post for Officers working various city sponsored events.

Summary of
Complaints or
Concerns 2025
There were no complaints or concerns received.

Internal Audits /
Violations 2025
No Violations
Intended
Acquisition in
2025
None

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Type 37 MM Launchers and Munitions (Category 14)
Description 37 MM Launchers are utilized by department personnel as a less lethal tool to launch kinetic energy projectiles.

Quantity 2 – total

1. Penn Arms L6/L8 37MM Multi-shot Launcher.

1. Penn Arms GL1-40 37 MM Single Shot Launcher.

Capabilities Both Penn Arms (L6/L8) & (GL1-40) 37MM Launchers are tactical launchersthat feature a fixed stock and iron sights. They will fire standard 37mm less lethal munitions.

Expected lifespan 25 Years
Manufacturer's
description
Less lethal 37 MM launchers allow for personnel to introduce less lethal munitions from a safe distance. The range of the weapon system helps to maintain space between officers and a suspect reducing the immediacy of the threat which is a principle of De-escalation.

Purpose and
authorized uses
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:

1. Self‐destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals.

2. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.

3. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained.

4. Potentially vicious animals.

5. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Fiscal impact No cost maintenance; only cost of yearly munitions for training and qualification.

Legal and
procedural rules
It is the policy of the Department to utilize the 37 mm only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

Required training Sworn members utilizing 37 MM less lethal munitions impact rounds are trained in their use by POST certified less lethal instructors.

Compliance
mechanisms
Operational use under the review of the On-duty Watch Commander or and governed under Dinuba Police Department Policy 303.9 Kinetic Energy Projectile Guidelines.

Use Reporting
2025
Was not used in 2025
Summary of
Complaints or
Concerns 2025
There were no complaints or concerns received.

Internal Audits /
Violations 2025
No Violations
Intended
Acquisition in
2025
None

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Type Specialized Firearms (Rifles) and Ammunition (Category 10) Description Guns that are fired from shoulder level, having a long spirally grooved barrel intended to make bullets spin and thereby have greater accuracy over a long distance.

Quantity 33 total
23 - Colt AR‐15/M4 Rifles
10 – Sig Sauer MCX Rifles
Capabilities Precision shooting at greater distances than offered by the issued handgun.

Expected lifespan 15 years
Manufacturer's
description
The Colt AR‐15/M4 is a lightweight, magazine fed, gas‐operated, shoulder fired, and semiautomatic rifle. The Sig Sauer MCX are a lightweight, magazine fed, short-stroke gas-operated piston, shoulder fired, and semiautomatic rifle.

Purpose and
authorized uses
To be used as precision weapon to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances as a handgun, if present and feasible.

Fiscal impact No cost maintenance; only cost of yearly ammunition for training and qualification.

Legal and
procedural rules
It is the policy of the Dinuba Police Department to utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Required training Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.

Compliance
mechanisms
Operational use governed by Dinuba Police Department Policy 306‐ Firearms.

Use Reporting
2025
The rifles were used during range qualifications and training. The rifles were also deployed during patrol operations per policy but were not discharged.

Summary of
Complaints or
Concerns 2025
There were no complaints or concerns received.

Internal Audits /
Violations 2025
No Violations
Intended
Acquisition in
2025
None

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Type Flash Bang (Category 12)
Description A grenade that produces a bright flash and a loud noise.

Quantity 10
Capabilities A flashbang produces a bright flash and a loud noise so as to stun or disorient people without causing serious injury.

Expected lifespan 25 years
Manufacturer's
description
The Non-Reloadable Distraction Device unit incorporates an M201A1 type fuse with hex design gun steel body. This is compact version of the 8933 Low Roll body Distraction Device is the newest version of the first reusable non-bursting canister that limits movement and rolling once deployed. The compact Distraction Device fits safely in your hand and packs all the power of the full size Distraction Device. This is a smaller, lighter device with the same output.

Purpose and
authorized uses
To be used by trained personnel during the service of a search warrant as a distractionary device.

Fiscal impact Zero
Legal and
procedural rules
It is the policy of the Department to use flashbangs only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.

Required training Prior to using a flashbang, officers must be trained in the operation of the flashbang.

Compliance
mechanisms
Operational use under the review of the Operation Division Lieutenant, on-duty Watch Commander or appropriate team supervisor and governed under Dinuba Police Department Policy 705‐Military Equipment.

Use Reporting
2025
Was not used in 2025
Summary of
Complaints or
Concerns 2025
There were no complaints or concerns received.

Internal Audits /
Violations 2025
No Violations
Intended
Acquisition in
2025
None

DINUBA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT ON CONTROLLED EQUIPMENT – 2025 Type UAV / Drone (Category 1)
Description An unmanned aerial vehicle
Quantity 7 Total
1- DJI Matrice 200 (Fire Dept) (Not in use)
3- DJI Avata 2
1- DJI Mavic 3
2- DJI Matrice 4T
Capabilities Night Vision / 30 times zoom
Expected lifespan 20 years
Manufacturer's
description
Powerful aerial imaging system with class-leading agility and speed, redundant components for maximum reliability, and smart features that make performing complex tasks easy.

Purpose and
authorized uses
To be used by trained personnel anytime an aerial view of an incident or situation would increase officer safety or public safety.

Fiscal impact Zero
Legal and
procedural rules
It is the policy of the Dinuba Police Department to utilize UAV/Drones only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of UAV/Drones.

Required training Prior to using a UAV/Drone, officers must be certified by FAA instructors in the operation of the UAV/Drone. Additionally, all members that operate any UAV/Drone are required to possess their FAA license.

Compliance
mechanisms
Operational use under the review of the Operation Division Lieutenant, on-duty Watch Commander or appropriate team supervisor and governed under Dinuba Police Department Policy 606 ‐ Unmanned Aerial Systems.

Use Reporting
2025
Used 50 times to assist in the detection / location of suspects involved in crimes, for mapping of traffic accident scenes, trainings and community demonstrations.

Summary of
Complaints or
Concerns 2025
There were no complaints or concerns received.

Internal Audits /
Violations 2025
No Violations
Intended
Acquisition in
2025
The 4 drones that were purchased in 2025 were previously allocated through the departments evidence budget, range budget and general fund, to accommodate the 2 newly trained pilots (3 total pilots).

City Council Staff Report
Department: ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES
June 9, 2026
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karina Solis, Administrative Services Director
By: Jacqueline Lopez, Sr. Fiscal Analyst
Subject: Resolution No. 2026-37 Ordering the Annual Levy of Landscape and Lighting Districts Annual Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-27; and Resolution No. 2026-38 Approving Certification Compliance and Hold Harmless Statement (KS)
RECOMMENDATION:

Council conduct a public hearing to receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and take the following action by one motion:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-37 ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the City’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 2026/27, and

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-38 approving the Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement form regarding the levy and collection of assessments within the City’s landscaping and lighting assessment districts for fiscal year 2026/27.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City of Dinuba, by previous resolutions, formed a total of 18 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts (collectively referred to as the “Districts”). The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, pursuant to which these Districts were formed, requires City Council action annually to update the assessments which appear on the Tulare County property tax roll. On May 12, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-22, which initiated proceedings to levy assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27; Resolution No. 2026-23, which approved the District’s Annual Reports; and Resolution Nos. 2026-24, which declared intent to levy the special assessments and set a Public Hearing. Resolution No. 2026-37 (Attachment '1') and Resolution No. 2026-38

(Attachment '2') are attached herein for Council consideration.

OUTSTANDING ISSUES:

None.

DISCUSSION:

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“the Act”) authorizes cities to impose assessments on benefitted properties to finance construction of street landscaping, street lighting, traffic signals, parks, street trees, sidewalk repair, recreational improvements; as well as maintenance and servicing of any of these improvements. In accordance with Act, the City formed 18 Districts.

Each year, the City prepares an annual report for each District, along with the District estimates for an operating budget, to calculate the assessment annually levied for each parcel. This report is attached herein as 'Attachment 4'. This budget determines what maintenance operations are performed for the fiscal year and directs the County Assessor what to levy each parcel. The proposed assessment rates for some districts are higher this year than last year. However, the rates are less than the property owner approved maximum assessment rates for all districts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The amount of the levy on each parcel is proposed to either stay the same or increase from Fiscal Year 2025/26. The rates are less than or equal to the property owner approved maximum assessment. The Fiscal Year 2026/27 Annual Report prepared for the Districts was approved on May 12, 2026, and provides the details of the rates and levy for the Districts.

In order to fund the maintenance activities of all 18 Districts, it is estimated that a total annual budget of approximately $636,984 is required for Fiscal Year 2026/27, of which $65,055 is General Benefit that cannot be funded through the assessments. It is anticipated that a total of approximately $525,698 will be collected in assessment revenue. A total of approximately $36,810 in available district funds will be used to fund a portion of the difference between the anticipated expenses and assessment revenue. The remaining difference of approximately $9,421 will need to be funded via a contribution from an unrestricted revenue source by the City.

The following districts propose to levy assessment rates that are higher than the prior year, based on the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2026/27, and the assessment rates are equal to or less than the maximum assessment rates:
• Assessment District No. 89-01 – Country Club Estates

• Assessment District No. 90-02 – Peachwood Village
• Assessment District No. 92-01 – Nebraska Park
• Assessment District No. 93-01 – Marshall Acres
• Assessment District No. 95-01 – Tierra Vista
• Assessment District No. 99-01 – Morningside Phase 2
• Assessment District No. 06-03 – Sierra View
• Assessment District No. 06-04 – Stony Creek
• Assessment District No. 09-01 – Viscaya
• Assessment District No. 08-01 – Parkside-Muirfield
• Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District The following districts propose no increase to the levy assessment rates, which indicate they will remain equal to the prior year based on the estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2026/27 and where the assessment rates are still less than the maximum assessment rates:
• Assessment District No. 95-02 – Sierra Heights
• Assessment District No. 06-01 – Sugar Plum-Villagio
• Assessment District No. 06-02 – Citrus Heights
• Assessment District No. 10-02 – Lincoln-McKinley
The following districts propose to levy at the maximum assessment rate, which does not increase, so they are equal to the prior year:
• Assessment District No. 90-01 – Harvest Estates
• Assessment District No. 98-01 – Alta Mission
• Assessment District No. 98-02 – Morningside Phase 1
State regulations require a two-part process to complete the annual levy. The first part of the process requires Council to take action to initiate proceedings for the levy, approve the Annual Reports for the Districts and call for a Public Hearing. The second part to complete the levy process is for the Council to conduct a Public Hearing to allow all interested persons an opportunity to hear and be heard and, if no majority protest exists, order the levy and collection of the assessments within the Districts.

The Tulare County Auditor’s Office requires that the Council approve the Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement form prior to accepting the submittal of the special assessments. This form, which is attached herein as 'Attachment 3', is an annual requirement by the County and the Council has approved this form annually as a part of the annual resolution ordering the levy and collection of assessments within

the City’s landscaping and lighting assessment districts. The action by the Council will fulfill the 2026/27 requirements for the Tulare County Auditor’s Office to accept the submittal of the annual levy of landscaping and lighting district assessments.

PUBLIC HEARING:

A notice of the hearing was published in the Mid-Valley Times on May 28, 2026, and on the City’s website.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 2026-37 Ordering the levy and collection of assessments within the City's Landscaping and Lighting

2. Resolution 2026-38 Approving the Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement form regarding the levy and collection

3. Hold Harmless Statement

4. Dinuba L&Ls Engineer's Report 2026-27

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-37

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA,

CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY’S LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dinuba (“City Council”), pursuant to the terms of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 16, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500), previously formed the landscaping and lighting assessment districts (the “Districts”) known and designated as follows:
 Country Club Estates No. 3 Subdivision Assessment District No. 89-01  Harvest Estates Subdivision Assessment District No. 90-01  Peachwood Village Subdivision Assessment District No. 90-02  Nebraska Park/Pond Benefit Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 92-01  Marshall Acres Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 93-01  Tierra Vista Phase I Assessment District No. 95-01
 Sierra Heights Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 95-02  Alta Mission Estates Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 98-01  Morningside Phase 1 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 98-02  Morningside Phase 2 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 99-01  Sugar Plum – Villagio Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-01  Citrus Heights Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-02  Sierra View Estates Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-03  Stony Creek Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-04  Parkside-Muirfield Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 08-01  Viscaya I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 09-01  Lincoln-McKinley Estates Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 10-02  Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District WHEREAS, the City of Dinuba (the “City”) retained NBS for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the Districts, and the preparation and filing of the Annual Report designated as the “City of Dinuba, Fiscal Year 2026/27 Engineer’s Report, Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts.” WHEREAS, NBS has prepared, and filed with the City Clerk, the Annual Report concerning the assessments within the Districts for Fiscal Year 2026/27. Reference is made to such Annual Report, which presents, for each District, the plans and specifications for the improvements to be maintained, serviced and operated, an estimate of the costs for the maintenance, service and operation of the improvements, and an assessment of the estimated costs; and, WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2026/27 assessments are not proposed to increase above the amount previously approved by affected property owners (“increased assessment” as defined in Section 54954.6 of the California Government Code); and,
WHEREAS, the assessments are not based upon the assessed value of property within each District, but are based upon the special benefit received from the improvements therein; and, WHEREAS, the assessments are in compliance with all laws pertaining to assessments levied pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218.

Attachment '1'

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dinuba, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:

1. Following notice duly given, the City Council has held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding the Fiscal Year 2026/27 assessments for the Districts, and considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons.

2. Based upon the City Council’s review of the Annual Report, which has been filed with the City Clerk, the City Council hereby finds and determines that:
a. The land within the Districts will receive special benefit from the maintenance, service and operation of the authorized improvements therein. b. The Districts include all of the lands receiving such special benefit. c. The net amounts to be assessed upon the lands within the Districts are apportioned by a formula which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such parcel from the maintenance, service and operation of the authorized improvements therein.

3. The assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27, as detailed within the Annual Report, are hereby confirmed as filed.

4. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of assessments for the Districts for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2026 and ending June 30, 2027.

5. The City Council hereby orders NBS to submit the assessments to the Tulare County Auditor’s Office for placement on the Fiscal Year 2026/27 secured property tax roll.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED upon motion of Council Member __________________, seconded by Council Member __________________, at a regular meeting this 9th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Mayor, City of Dinuba
ATTEST:

City Clerk, City of Dinuba
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney, City of Dinuba

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-38

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DINUBA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION AND

HOLD HARMLESS STATEMENT FORM REGARDING THE LEVY AND
COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE CITY’S LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Dinuba (“City Council”), pursuant to the terms of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 16, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500), previously formed the landscaping and lighting assessment districts (the “Districts”) known and designated as follows:
 Country Club Estates No. 3 Subdivision Assessment District No. 89-01  Harvest Estates Subdivision Assessment District No. 90-01  Peachwood Village Subdivision Assessment District No. 90-02  Nebraska Park/Pond Benefit Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 92-01  Marshall Acres Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 93-01  Tierra Vista Phase I Assessment District No. 95-01
 Sierra Heights Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 95-02  Alta Mission Estates Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 98-01  Morningside Phase 1 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 98-02  Morningside Phase 2 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 99-01  Sugar Plum – Villagio Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-01  Citrus Heights Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-02  Sierra View Estates Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-03  Stony Creek Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 06-04  Parkside-Muirfield Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 08-01  Viscaya I & II Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 09-01  Lincoln-McKinley Estates Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 10-02  Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District WHEREAS, NBS is placing the special assessments on the Tulare County secured property tax roll for collection, and the Tulare County requires the City Council to approve the Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement form (see Attachment) prior to accepting the submittal of the special assessments; and
WHEREAS, the assessments are in compliance with all laws pertaining to assessments levied pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Division 15, Part 2 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and the assessments are in compliance with the provisions of Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the assessments are not based upon the assessed value of property within each District, but are based upon the special benefit received from the improvements therein; and WHEREAS, the City Council agrees that it shall be solely liable and responsible, and will defend and hold the County of Tulare harmless from any liability as a result of claims or claims for refunds and related interest due filed by taxpayers against any assessments, fees, charges or taxes placed on the roll for the City Council by the County; and
Attachment '2'

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Dinuba, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:

1. The City Council does hereby approve the Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement form (see Attachment) regarding the levy and collection of assessments within the City of Dinuba landscaping and lighting assessment districts for fiscal year 2026/27.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED upon motion of Council Member __________________, seconded by Council Member __________________, at a regular meeting this 9th day of June, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Mayor, City of Dinuba
ATTEST:

City Clerk, City of Dinuba
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney, City of Dinuba

Attachment '3'
Compliance Certification and Hold Harmless Statement
The City/District of ________________________________ certifies the following:

I have read and am familiar with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the State Constitution as revised by Proposition 218, including the articles cited below, and believe that all of the taxes, assessments, levies and fees accompanying this submission to the County Auditor-Controller for inclusion on the secured property tax roll are in compliance with the law.

Article XIIIC. Sec. 2 c. “Any general tax imposed, extended, or increased, without voter approval, by any local government on or after January 1, 1995, and prior to the effective date of this article, shall continue to be imposed only if approved by a majority vote of the voters voting in an election on the issue of imposition, which election shall be held within two years of the effective date of this article and in compliance with subdivision b.”
Article XIIIC. Sec. 2 d. “No local government may impose, extend, or increase any special tax unless and until that tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a two-thirds vote. A special tax shall not be deemed to have been increased if it is imposed at a rate not higher than the maximum rate so approved.” Article XIIID. Sec. 5. “…this article shall become effective the day after the election unless otherwise provided. Beginning July 1, 1997, all existing, new, or increased assessments shall comply with this article.”
Article XIIID. Sec. 6 d. “Beginning July 1, 1997, all fees or charges shall comply with this section.” In addition, the City/District agrees that it shall be solely liable and responsible, and will defend and hold the County harmless from any liability as a result of claims or claims for refunds and related interest due filed by taxpayers against any assessments, fees, charges or taxes placed on the roll for the City/District by the County; and
The City/District shall be solely liable and responsible, and will defend and hold the County and the County Auditor harmless from any and all legal fees or other costs incurred related to such a claim.

Approved by the governing Board on _____________________________________________________ Date
_____________________________________________ ____________________________ City/District Manager Date

Engineer’s Report For: Fiscal Year 2026/27
Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts
May 2026
Attachment '4'

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Proposed 2026/27 Levy ........................................................................................... 2

1.2 Prior Year and Proposed Rates ................................................................................ 3 Country Club Estates ....................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Plans and Specifications .......................................................................................... 4

2.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ........................................................................... 4

2.3 General Benefit ....................................................................................................... 4

2.4 Estimate of Costs ..................................................................................................... 5

2.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates ...................................................................... 5

2.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ........................................................................ 6

2.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................... 6 Harvest Estates ............................................................................................................... 7

3.1 Plans and Specifications .......................................................................................... 7

3.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ........................................................................... 7

3.3 General Benefit ....................................................................................................... 7

3.4 Estimate of Costs ..................................................................................................... 8

3.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates ...................................................................... 8

3.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ........................................................................ 9

3.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................... 9 Peachwood Village ....................................................................................................... 10

4.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 10

4.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 10

4.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 10

4.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 11

4.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 11

4.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 12

4.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 12 Nebraska Park .............................................................................................................. 13

5.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 13

5.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 13

5.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 14

5.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 14

5.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 15

5.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 15

5.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 16 Marshall Acres .............................................................................................................. 17

6.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 17

6.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 17

6.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 17

6.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 18

6.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 18

6.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 19

6.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 19 Tierra Vista ................................................................................................................... 20

7.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 20

7.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 20

7.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 20

7.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 21

7.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 21

7.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 22

7.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 22 Sierra Heights ............................................................................................................... 23

8.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 23

8.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 23

8.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 23

8.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 24

8.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 24

8.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 25

8.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 25 Alta Mission ................................................................................................................. 26

9.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 26

9.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 26

9.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 26

9.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 27

9.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 27

9.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 28

9.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 28 Morningside Phase 1 .................................................................................................... 29

10.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 29

10.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 29

10.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 30

10.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 30

10.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 30

10.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 31

10.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 31 Morningside Phase 2 .................................................................................................... 32

11.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 32

11.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 32

11.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 32

11.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 33

11.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 33

11.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 34

11.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 35 Sugar Plum/Villagio ...................................................................................................... 36

12.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 36

12.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 36

12.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 36

12.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 37

12.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 37

12.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 38

12.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 38 Citrus Heights ............................................................................................................... 39

13.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 39

13.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 39

13.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 39

13.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 40

13.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 40

13.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 41

13.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 41 Sierra View ................................................................................................................... 42

14.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 42

14.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 42

14.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 42

14.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 43

14.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 43

14.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 44

14.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 44 Stony Creek .................................................................................................................. 45

15.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 45

15.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 45

15.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 45

15.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 46

15.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 46

15.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 47

15.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 47 Parkside/Muirfield........................................................................................................ 48

16.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 48

16.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 48

16.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 48

16.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 49

16.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 49

16.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 50

16.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 50 Viscaya ......................................................................................................................... 51

17.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 51

17.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 51

17.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 51

17.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 52

17.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 52

17.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 53

17.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 53 Lincoln/Mckinley .......................................................................................................... 54

18.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 54

18.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 54

18.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 54

18.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 55

18.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 55

18.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 56

18.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 56 Parkside Village 2 & 3 ................................................................................................... 57

19.1 Plans and Specifications ........................................................................................ 57

19.2 Boundary Description & Diagram ......................................................................... 57

19.3 General Benefit ..................................................................................................... 57

19.4 Estimate of Costs ................................................................................................... 58

19.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates .................................................................... 58

19.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs ...................................................................... 58

19.7 Assessment Funds ................................................................................................. 59

Appendix A: Assessment Roll ........................................................................................ 60 Appendix B: Boundary Maps ......................................................................................... 61 Appendix C: Maps of Improvements ............................................................................. 62

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Dinuba (the “City”) has formed several assessment districts to fund landscape and lighting improvements throughout the City. Each assessment district has been formed pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”). This report is prepared in accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Act.

The assessment districts include:

Assessment District No. 89-01 – Country Club Estates
Assessment District No. 90-01 – Harvest Estates
Assessment District No. 90-02 – Peachwood Village
Assessment District No. 92-01 – Nebraska Park
Assessment District No. 93-01 – Marshall Acres
Assessment District No. 95-01 – Tierra Vista
Assessment District No. 95-02 – Sierra Heights
Assessment District No. 98-01 – Alta Mission
Assessment District No. 98-02 – Morningside Phase 1
Assessment District No. 99-01 – Morningside Phase 2
Assessment District No. 06-01 – Sugar Plum/Villagio
Assessment District No. 06-02 – Citrus Heights
Assessment District No. 06-03 – Sierra View
Assessment District No. 06-04 – Stony Creek
Assessment District No. 08-01 – Parkside/Muirfield
Assessment District No. 09-01 – Viscaya
Assessment District No. 10-02 – Lincoln/McKinley
Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3 Landscape and Lighting Assessment District Collectively, the assessment districts are referred to as the “Districts” in this report.

Each of the Districts is a separate assessment district with a separate budget designed to fund certain improvements that benefit each individual assessment district. Each assessment district has its own assessment rates and boundaries. The Districts are only combined in this report for convenience.

All districts listed above, excluding Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3, were formed by the City. The City is responsible for the development of the boundaries, the assessment rates, and the assessment methodology. The final assessment district listed, Parkside Village Unit Nos. 2 and 3, was formed by NBS in October of 2015.

The City engaged NBS to perform a general benefit analysis for the Districts during the 2016/17 Fiscal Year.

That analysis resulted in recommended general benefit percentages for the Districts. The budgets for the Districts reflect the general benefit percentage recommendations. The City Clerk’s office has a copy of the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis, as well as copies of the original Engineer’s Reports.

This analysis and original Engineer’s Reports are made part of this report by reference.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 2

1.1 Proposed 2026/27 Levy
The following table summarizes the proposed 2026/27 levy for the Districts:

District
No. District Name
2026/27
Maximum
Assessment
Rate
2026/27
Proposed
Assessment
Rate
2026/27
Benefit
Units
2026/27
Estimated
Assessment (1)
2026/27
Contribution
from NonAssessment
Sources (2)
89-01 Country Club Estates $349.52 $349.52 52 $18,175.04 $1,925.00 90-01 Harvest Estates 91.72 91.72 18 1,650.96 1,473.90
90-02 Peachwood Village 336.46 336.46 95 31,963.70 1,178.84 92-01 Nebraska Park 231.35 231.34 419.28 96,996.24 18,076.67 93-01 Marshall Acres 231.46 231.46 80 18,516.80 3,788.62 95-01 Tierra Vista 288.93 288.92 30 8,667.60 583.30
95-02 Sierra Heights 186.17 186.16 84 15,637.44 1,713.60 98-01 Alta Mission 125.00 125.00 41 5,125.00 3,366.96
98-02 Morningside Phase 1 170.18 170.18 48 8,168.64 8,133.46 99-01 Morningside Phase 2 272.49 175.68 60.51 10,630.89 5,221.91 06-01 Sugar Plum/Villagio 311.27 140.56 143 20,100.08 16,807.16 06-02 Citrus Heights 377.20 125.74 16 2,011.84 1,460.44 06-03 Sierra View 302.94 290.26 25 7,256.50 558.36
06-04 Stony Creek 324.96 183.96 11 2,023.56 4,936.38
08-01 Parkside/Muirfield 566.24 205.82 356 73,271.92 33,183.08 09-01 Viscaya 652.76 376.24 401 150,872.24 5,413.71
10-02 Lincoln/McKinley 426.02 362.88 15 5,443.20 317.48 NA Parkside Village 2 & 3 403.16 403.16 122 49,185.52 3,147.60 Total 2016.79 $525,697.17 $111,286.47
(1) Excludes installment rounding. The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County. (2) Includes contributions from District reserve funds, general benefit contributions, and any budget shortfall.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 3

1.2 Prior Year and Proposed Rates
The following table summarizes the current and historical assessment rates for the Districts:

District
No.

District
Name
2026/27
Maximum
Assessment
Rate
2025/26
Maximum
Assessment
Rate Difference
2026/27
Proposed
Assessment
Rate
2025/26
Assessment
Rate Difference
89-01 Country Club Estates(1) $349.52 $332.88 $16.64 $349.52 $332.88 $16.64 90-01 Harvest Estates(2) 91.72 91.72 0.00 91.72 91.72 0.00 90-02 Peachwood Village(1) 336.46 320.44 16.02 336.46 320.44 16.02 92-01 Nebraska Park(1) 231.35 220.34 11.01 231.34 220.34 11.00 93-01 Marshall Acres(1) 231.46 220.44 11.02 231.46 220.44 11.02 95-01 Tierra Vista(1) 288.93 275.17 13.76 288.92 275.16 13.76 95-02 Sierra Heights(1) 186.17 186.17 0.00 186.16 186.16 0.00 98-01 Alta Mission(2)) 125.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 125.00 0.00 98-02 Morningside Phase 1(2) 170.18 170.18 0.00 170.18 170.18 0.00 99-01 Morningside Phase 2(3) 272.49 267.14 5.35 175.68 167.16 8.52 06-01 Sugar Plum/Villagio(4) 311.27 303.16 8.11 140.56 140.56 0.00 06-02 Citrus Heights(4) 377.20 367.37 9.83 125.74 125.74 0.00 06-03 Sierra View(4) 302.94 295.04 7.90 290.26 276.44 13.82 06-04 Stony Creek(4) 324.96 316.49 8.47 183.96 175.20 8.76 08-01 Parkside/Muirfield(4) 566.24 551.47 14.77 205.82 196.02 9.80 09-01 Viscaya(4) 652.76 635.74 17.02 376.24 361.78 14.46 10-02 Lincoln/McKinley(4) 426.02 414.91 11.11 362.88 362.88 0.00 NA Parkside Village 2 & 3(5) 403.16 392.65 10.51 403.16 392.65 10.51 (1) Annual Maximum inflator is the lesser of costs or 5%. (2) No annual Maximum inflator.
(3) Annual Maximum inflator is the change in the California Statewide CPI as of October of each year, not to exceed 2%. The CPI increase was 3.29%, therefore the maximum rate increase for Fiscal Year 2026/27 is 2%. (4) Annual Maximum inflator is change in the US City Average CPI-U as of December of each year. The effective increase for 2026/27 was

2.6771%.
(5) Annual Maximum inflator is change in the US City Average CPI-U as of December of each year, not to exceed 3%. The effective increase for 2026/27 was 2.6771%.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 4

COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES
Assessment District No. 89-01 – Country Club Estates (“Country Club Estates”) was formed in 1989 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

2.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Country Club Estates:
 A landscaping strip along West El Monte Way
 A detention pond at the end of North Kelly Drive (also with frontage on West Pamela Lane)  Masonry walls along West El Monte Way and along the portions of three parcels that share a border with the detention pond.
 Five internal streetlights and an additional three along North Lillie Avenue (on the Country Club Estates side of North Lillie Avenue)
These improvements are collectively known as the “Country Club Estates Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

2.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Country Club Estates generally consists of property northerly located along West Kelly Drive, west of Lillie Avenue, north of West El Monte Way, and properties easterly located along North Kelly Drive.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Country Club Estates can be found in Appendix B of this report.

2.3 General Benefit
The Country Club Estates Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Country Club Estates. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 15.4% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 5

2.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Country Club Estates Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $10,000.00
Contractor Costs (2) 2,500.00
Total Maintenance Costs $12,500.00
County Costs (3) $65.90
City Administrative Overhead (4) 673.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,350.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 3,586.14
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $5,675.04 Total Costs $18,175.04
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County of Tulare (the “County”) charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied.
(4) Includes City overhead; liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

2.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $332.88 $332.88
2026/27 349.52 349.52
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 6

2.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Country Club Estates Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $18,175.04
General Benefit Percentage (1) 15.4%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution 1,925.00 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 10,575.00
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 5,675.04 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 52.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $349.52
Maximum Assessment Revenue 18,175.04
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $12,663.90
Proposed Assessment Rate 349.52
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 18,175.04
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 5,511.14
City Contribution for General Benefit $1,925.00
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

2.7 Assessment Funds
Country Club Estates is projected to have a balance of approximately $160 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease of the estimated June 30, 2025, deficit of $5,350.

The City will contribute approximately $1,925 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 15.4% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 7

HARVEST ESTATES
Assessment District No. 90-01 – Harvest Estates (“Harvest Estates”) was formed in 1990 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

3.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Harvest Estates:
 Three external streetlights (along North Euclid Avenue) and two internal streetlights (on Euclid Circle)
These improvements are collectively known as the “Harvest Estates Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

3.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Harvest Estates generally consists of property located south of West Nebraska Avenue, east of North Euclid Avenue and along West Euclid Circle, and west of North Alta Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Harvest Estates can be found in Appendix B of this report.

3.3 General Benefit
The Harvest Estates Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Harvest Estates. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 36.1% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 8

3.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Harvest Estates Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $1,618.05
Contractor Costs (2) 0.00
Total Maintenance Costs $1,618.05
County Costs (3) $22.81
City Administrative Overhead (4) 144.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $1,506.81 Total Costs $3,124.86
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

3.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

There is no rate inflator associated with Harvest Estates. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate has remained the same since the district was formed.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $91.72 $91.72
2026/27 91.72 91.72
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 9

3.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Harvest Estates Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $3,124.86
General Benefit Percentage (1) 36.100%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $584.12 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 1,033.93
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 1,506.81 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 18.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $91.72
Maximum Assessment Revenue 1,650.96
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $2,540.74
Proposed Assessment Rate 91.72
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 1,650.96
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (889.78)
City Contribution for General Benefit $584.12
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 889.78
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

3.7 Assessment Funds
Harvest Estates is projected to have a deficit balance of $15,565 on June 30, 2026, which represents an increase of the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $14,675.

The City will contribute approximately $585 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 36.1% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget, as well as the budget shortfall of approximately $890.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 10

PEACHWOOD VILLAGE
Assessment District No. 90-02 – Peachwood Village (“Peachwood Village”) was formed in 1990 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

4.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Peachwood Village:
 Landscaping strips along North Lillie Avenue in front of the detention pond and along Alice Avenue northeast of the park
 Masonry walls along Saginaw Avenue and along the back of the parcels to the northeast of Pacific Circle Drive
 15 internal streetlights
 A detention pond along North Lillie Avenue
These improvements are collectively known as the “Peachwood Village Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

4.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Peachwood Village generally consists of property south of Saginaw Avenue, east of the railroad tracks and North Alice Street, along and north of West North Way, and along and east of both North Kelly Drive and North Lyndsay Way.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Peachwood Village can be found in Appendix B of this report.

4.3 General Benefit
The Peachwood Village Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Peachwood Village. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 4.0% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 11

4.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Peachwood Village Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $19,471.00
Contractor Costs (2) 10,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $29,471.00
County Costs (3) $120.40
City Administrative Overhead (4) 841.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,360.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 171.30
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $2,492.70 Total Costs $31,963.70
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

4.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $320.44 $320.44
2026/27 336.46 336.46
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 12

4.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Peachwood Village Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $31,963.70
General Benefit Percentage (1) 4.000%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $1,178.84 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 28,292.16
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 2,492.70 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 95.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $336.46
Maximum Assessment Revenue 31,963.70
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $30,613.56
Proposed Assessment Rate 336.46
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 31,963.70
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 1,350.14
City Contribution for General Benefit $1,178.84
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

4.7 Assessment Funds
Peachwood Village is projected to have a deficit balance of $40,135 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease of the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $41,485.

The City will contribute approximately $1,180 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 4% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 13

NEBRASKA PARK
Assessment District No. 92-01 – Nebraska Park (“Nebraska Park”) was formed in 1992 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

5.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Nebraska Park:
 A detention basin bounded by chain-link fencing at the west end of the Northridge Village townhome development (with frontage along Davis Drive)
 A detention basin bounded by chain-link fencing within the park at the corner of Nebraska Avenue and Oak Drive
 Masonry walls along Nebraska Avenue that continue down Lincoln Avenue  Masonry walls along Nebraska Avenue that extend from Oak Drive to Hayes Avenue  100 streetlights
 A park at the corner of Nebraska Avenue and Oak Drive  Landscaping:
 Along Davis Drive in front of the detention basin and the Northridge Village townhomes  Along Davis Drive in front of the parcels between North Villa Avenue and Eaton Avenue  A small median on Northridge Drive, west of Eaton Avenue  Along the masonry wall along Nebraska Avenue that continues down North Lincoln Avenue  Along the portion of the park that fronts Nebraska Avenue  Along the masonry wall along Nebraska Avenue that stretches from Oak Drive to Hayes Avenue  A small traffic circle at the intersection of Hayes Avenue and Briarwood Drive These improvements are collectively known as the “Nebraska Park Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

5.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Nebraska Park generally consists of property south of East Nebraska Avenue, west of North Alta Avenue, north of East Davis Drive, west of North Eaton Avenue, north of East Northridge Drive, east of North Newton Drive, north of East Bel Aire Drive, north of East Davis Drive, and west of North Crawford Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Nebraska Park can be found in Appendix B of this report.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 14

5.3 General Benefit
The Nebraska Park Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Nebraska Park. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 25.4% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

5.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Nebraska Park Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $46,168.00
Contractor Costs (2) 25,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $71,168.00
County Costs (3) $565.00
City Administrative Overhead (4) 13,543.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 4,120.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 7,600.64
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $25,828.64 Total Costs $96,996.64
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 15

5.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are first divided proportionally among the assessable acreage and then equally among the assessable lots resulting from subdivision.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $220.34 $220.34
2026/27 231.34 231.35
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

The rates in the table above represent the lowest levy amount for a single-family residential (SFR) parcel in Nebraska Park. SFR parcels with this assessment represent the base benefit unit in order to maintain the proportionality established by the City through historical practice.

5.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements in Nebraska Park:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $96,996.64
General Benefit Percentage (1) 25.400%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $18,076.67 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 53,091.33
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 25,828.64 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 419.28
Maximum Assessment Rate $231.35
Maximum Assessment Revenue 97,000.84
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $71,319.33
Proposed Assessment Rate 231.34
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 96,996.64
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 25,677.31
City Contribution for General Benefit $18,076.67
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 16 The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

5.7 Assessment Funds
Nebraska Park is projected to have a balance of $39,600 on June 30, 2026, which represents an increase from the estimated June 30, 2025 balance of $13,920.

The City will contribute approximately $18,075 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 25.4% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 17

MARSHALL ACRES
Assessment District No. 93-01 – Marshall Acres (“Marshall Acres”) was formed in 1993 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

6.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Marshall Acres:
 Landscaping strips along East Kamm Avenue and along South College Avenue  Masonry walls along East Kamm Avenue and along South College Avenue  Nine external streetlights (along East Kamm Avenue and South College Avenue) and 13 internal streetlights
 A park at the corner of East La Vista Avenue and South Wright Street  A detention pond along South Wright Street
These improvements are collectively known as the “Marshall Acres Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

6.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Marshall Acres generally consists of property south of East Kamm Avenue, west of South College Avenue, and along both East Marshall Avenue and South Wright Street.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Marshall Acres can be found in Appendix B of this report.

6.3 General Benefit
The Marshall Acres Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Marshall Acres. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 21.8% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 18

6.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Marshall Acres Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $11,379.00
Contractor Costs (2) 6,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $17,379.00
County Costs (3) $101.39
City Administrative Overhead (4) 841.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,390.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $2,332.39 Total Costs $19,711.39
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

6.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $220.44 $220.44
2026/27 231.46 231.46
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 19

6.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Marshall Acres Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $19,711.39
General Benefit Percentage (1) 21.800%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $3,788.62 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 13,590.38
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 2,332.39 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 80.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $231.46
Maximum Assessment Revenue 18,516.80
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $15,922.77
Proposed Assessment Rate 231.46
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 18,516.80
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 2,594.03
City Contribution for General Benefit $3,788.62
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

6.7 Assessment Funds
Marshall Acres is projected to have a deficit balance of $72,680 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease of the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $75,275.

The City will contribute approximately $3,790 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 21.8% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 20

TIERRA VISTA
Assessment District No. 95-01 – Tierra Vista (“Tierra Vista”) was formed in 1995 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

7.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Tierra Vista:
 Landscaping strips along North Crawford Avenue on either side of East Gerald Avenue  Masonry walls along North Crawford Avenue on either side of East Gerald Avenue  One external (along North Crawford Avenue) and five internal (on East Gerald Ave, Cherie Ann Ave) streetlights
These improvements are collectively known as the “Tierra Vista Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

7.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Tierra Vista generally consists of property east of North Crawford Avenue along East Gerald Avenue and Cherie Ann Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Tierra Vista can be found in Appendix B of this report.

7.3 General Benefit
The Tierra Vista Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Tierra Vista. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 9.5% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 21

7.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Tierra Vista Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $3,140.00
Contractor Costs (2) 3,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $6,140.00
County Costs (3) $38.02
City Administrative Overhead (4) 0.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 1,149.58
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $2,527.60 Total Costs $8,667.60
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

7.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $275.16 $275.17
2026/27 288.92 288.93
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 22

7.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Tierra Vista Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $8,667.60
General Benefit Percentage (1) 9.500%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $583.30 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 5,556.70
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 2,527.60 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 30.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $288.93
Maximum Assessment Revenue 8,667.90
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $6,934.72
Proposed Assessment Rate 288.92
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 8,667.60
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 1,732.88
City Contribution for General Benefit $583.30
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

7.7 Assessment Funds
Tierra Vista is projected to have a deficit balance of $850 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease of the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $2,590.

The City will contribute approximately $585 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 9.5% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 23

SIERRA HEIGHTS
Assessment District No. 95-02 – Sierra Heights (“Sierra Heights”) was formed in 1995 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

8.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Sierra Heights:
 Landscaping along East Kamm Avenue
 A masonry wall along East Kamm Avenue
 Eight streetlights for Phase 1 and seven lights for Phase 2 These improvements are collectively known as the “Sierra Heights Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

8.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Sierra Heights generally consists of property along and south of Kamm Avenue, east of Alta Avenue, along and north of Lois Lane, along and west of Kimberly Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Sierra Heights can be found in Appendix B of this report.

8.3 General Benefit
The Sierra Heights Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Sierra Heights. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 16.8% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 24

8.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Sierra Heights Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $5,900.00
Contractor Costs (2) 4,300.00
Total Maintenance Costs $10,200.00
County Costs (3) $106.46
City Administrative Overhead (4) 4,094.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $5,540.46 Total Costs $15,740.46
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

8.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners approved the addition of the rate inflator. Accordingly, the maximum assessment rate increases annually by the lesser of cost or 5%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $186.16 $186.17
2026/27 186.16 186.17
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 25

8.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Sierra Heights Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $15,740.46
General Benefit Percentage (1) 16.800%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $1,713.60 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 8,486.40
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 5,540.46 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 84.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $186.17
Maximum Assessment Revenue 15,638.28
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $14,026.86
Proposed Assessment Rate 186.16
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 15,637.44
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 1,610.58
City Contribution for General Benefit $1,713.60
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) The difference between the Maximum Assessment Revenue and the Total Assessment Revenue Needed. A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

8.7 Assessment Funds
Sierra Heights is projected to have an estimated balance of $26,400 on June 30, 2026, which represents an increase from the estimated June 30, 2025 of $24,790.

The City will contribute approximately $1,715 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 16.8% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 26

ALTA MISSION
Assessment District No. 98-01 – Alta Mission Estates (“Alta Mission”) was formed in 1998 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

9.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Alta Mission:
 A landscaping strip along Alta Avenue
 A masonry wall along Alta Avenue and along the backside of the northernmost parcels in the district  Three external (along Alta Avenue) and five internal (on Lois Lane, Payan Ave, Exie Lane) streetlights These improvements are collectively known as the “Alta Mission Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

9.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Alta Mission generally consists of properties located along both sides of South Grace Lane, Kimberly Avenue, Lois Lane, Payan Avenue, and Exie Lane.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Alta Mission can be found in Appendix B of this report.

9.3 General Benefit
The Alta Mission Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Alta Mission. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 21.3% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 27

9.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Alta Mission Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $5,400.00
Contractor Costs (2) 1,700.00
Total Maintenance Costs $7,100.00
County Costs (3) $51.96
City Administrative Overhead (4) 0.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $1,391.96 Total Costs $8,491.96
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

9.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. There was a majority protest by property owners with regard to the addition of the rate inflator. As such, there is no rate inflator associated with Alta Mission.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $125.00 $125.00
2026/27 125.00 125.00
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 28

9.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Alta Mission Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $8,491.96
General Benefit Percentage (1) 21.300%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $1,512.30 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 5,587.70
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 1,391.96 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 41.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $125.00
Maximum Assessment Revenue 5,125.00
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $6,979.66
Proposed Assessment Rate 125.00
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 5,125.00
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (1,854.66)
City Contribution for General Benefit $1,512.30
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 1,854.66
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

9.7 Assessment Funds
Alta Mission is projected to have a deficit balance of $23,690 on June 30, 2026, which represents an increase from the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $21,835.

The City will contribute approximately $1,510 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 21.3% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget, as well as the budget shortfall of approximately $1,855.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 29 MORNINGSIDE PHASE 1
Assessment District No. 98-02 – Morningside Phase 1 (“Morningside Phase 1”) was formed in 1998 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

10.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Morningside Phase 1:
 Masonry walls along Road 72 and along the back of those parcels to the south of West Adelaide Way
 A short masonry wall on top of which is wood fencing for those parcels adjacent to the detention basin and park along West Pamela Lane
 A detention basin on West Pamela Lane (shared funding with Morningside Phase 2)  A turf area along West Pamela Lane (shared funding with Morningside Phase 2)  16 streetlights
 A chain-link fence around parcel 014-460-044 which is on Road 72 and is designated as “City of Dinuba Well Site” on the assessor’s map
 Landscaping:
 Two landscape strips along Road 72
 A landscape strip along Road 72 next to the Well Site  A landscape strip along Road 72 next to the Dinuba Gas & Food Mart parcel  Three separate landscape strips along West El Monte Way in front of the commercial parcels  A landscape strip along the south and east sides of the Well Site parcel and along the back of the SFR parcels south of West Adelaide Way
These improvements are collectively known as the “Morningside Phase 1 Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

10.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Morningside Phase 1 generally consists of properties along West Pamela Lane (at Morningstar Drive), north of West El Monte Way, and properties along West Adelaide Way.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Morningside Phase 1 can be found in Appendix B of this report.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 30

10.3 General Benefit
The Morningside Phase 1 Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Morningside Phase 1. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 28.2% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

10.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Morningside Phase 1 Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $7,100.00
Contractor Costs (2) 7,800.00
Total Maintenance Costs $14,900.00
County Costs (3) $62.10
City Administrative Overhead (4) 0.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $1,402.10 Total Costs $16,302.10
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

10.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

In July of 2008, a rate inflator was proposed to the property owners and a protest ballot proceeding was conducted by the City. The property owners did not approve the addition of the rate inflator. As such, there is no rate inflator associated with Morningside Phase 1.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 31 The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $170.18 $170.18
2026/27 170.18 170.18
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

10.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Morningside Phase 1 Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $16,302.10
General Benefit Percentage (1) 28.200%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $4,201.80 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 10,698.20
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 1,402.10 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 48.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $170.18
Maximum Assessment Revenue 8,168.64
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $12,100.30
Proposed Assessment Rate 170.18
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 8,168.64
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (3,931.66)
City Contribution for General Benefit $4,201.80
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 3,931.66
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

10.7 Assessment Funds
Morningside Phase 1 is projected to have a deficit balance of $132,400 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease of the estimated June 30, 2025 deficit of $128,465.

The City will contribute approximately $4,200 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 28.2% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget, as well as the budget shortfall of approximately $3,930.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 32 MORNINGSIDE PHASE 2
Assessment District No. 99-01 – Morningside Phase 2 (“Morningside Phase 2”) was formed in 1999 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

11.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Morningside Phase 2:
 A masonry wall along Road 72 only along the west side of the first parcel north of West Kelly Drive (014-470-009)
 Landscaping along the masonry wall
 12 streetlights
 A detention basin on West Pamela Lane (shared funding with Morningside Phase 1)  A turf area along West Pamela Lane (shared funding with Morningside Phase 1) These improvements are collectively known as the “Morningside Phase 2 Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

11.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Morningside Phase 2 generally consists of properties along West Kelley Drive, Quail Run Drive, Red Robin Drive, and Morningstar Drive.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Morningside Phase 2 can be found in Appendix B of this report.

11.3 General Benefit
The Morningside Phase 2 Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Morningside Phase 2. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 17.2% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 33

11.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Morningside Phase 2 Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $5,400.00
Contractor Costs (2) 9,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $14,400.00
County Costs (3) $112.80
City Administrative Overhead (4) 00.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $1,452.80 Total Costs $15,852.80
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

11.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots. At the time of formation, there were 47 SFR parcels that were each assigned an equal assessment. Additionally, there was one large lot parcel (originally referred to as Lot 48) that was assigned a total assessment of $2,242.83. In 2008, Lot 48 was subdivided into 41 SFR lots. This was equal to an original rate per lot of $54.70. As compared to the original SFR parcels not part of Lot 48, the Lot 48 SFR parcels were levied a rate that was approximately 32.177% of the other SFR parcels. In Fiscal Year 2019/20, a parcel in the Lot 48 subdivision that was originally slated to be a park, became an SFR. That parcel was added to the district and levied at the same rate as the other 41 parcels in the subdivision. Accordingly, two different rates are applied to these two groups: 47 SFRs at the original rate with the escalation factor, and the Lot 48 subdivided parcels at approximately 32.177% of that rate.

The formation engineer’s report for Morningside Phase 2 included an annual maximum rate inflator that is calculated using the same method for Proposition 13 taxation increases. The formula is based on the change in the California Statewide CPI as of October of each year, not to exceed 2%. The CPI increase was

3.29%, therefore the maximum rate increase for Fiscal Year 2026/27 is 2%.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 34 The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates for the SFR parcels not originating from Lot 48:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1)(2) Maximum Rate(2)
2025/26 $167.16 $267.14
2026/27 175.68 272.49
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County. (2) The rate for Lot 42 parcels is 32.177% of the rate shown, or $56.52.

11.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Morningside Phase 2 Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $15,852.80
General Benefit Percentage (1) 17.200%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $2,476.80 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 11,923.20
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 1,452.80 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 60.51
Maximum Assessment Rate $272.49
Maximum Assessment Revenue 16,489.17
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $13,376.00
Proposed Assessment Rate 175.68
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 10,630.89
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (2,745.11)
City Contribution for General Benefit $2,476.80
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 2,745.11
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 35

11.7 Assessment Funds
Morningside Phase 2 is projected to have a deficit balance of $26,130 on June 30, 2026, which represents a decrease to the estimated deficit balance of $23,385 as of June 30, 2025.

The City will contribute approximately $2,475 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 17.2% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget, as well as the budget shortfall of approximately $2,745.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 36

SUGAR PLUM/VILLAGIO
Assessment District No. 06-01 – Sugar Plum/Villagio (“Sugar Plum/Villagio”) was formed in 2005 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

12.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Sugar Plum/Villagio:
 Landscaping along Saginaw Avenue and Road 72
 Masonry walls along Saginaw Avenue and Road 72
 35 total streetlights (10 external along Road 72 & Saginaw Avenue and 25 internal) These improvements are collectively known as the “Sugar Plum/Villagio Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

12.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Sugar Plum/Villagio generally consists of property located south of Saginaw Avenue, west of Road 72, and easterly bounded by properties along Vernazza Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Sugar Plum/Villagio can be found in Appendix B of this report.

12.3 General Benefit
The Sugar Plum/Villagio Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Sugar Plum/Villagio. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 10.8% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 37

12.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Sugar Plum/Villagio Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $22,095.00
Contractor Costs (2) 7,400.00
Total Maintenance Costs $29,495.00
County Costs (3) $181.24
City Administrative Overhead (4) 4,511.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 2,720.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $7,412.24 Total Costs $36,907.24
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

12.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

The formation engineer’s report for Sugar Plum/Villagio included an annual maximum rate inflator that is calculated based on the change in the US City Average CPI-U as of December of each year. The effective increase for 2026/27 was 2.6771%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $140.56 $303.16
2026/27 140.56 311.27
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 38

12.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Sugar Plum/Villagio Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $36,907.24
General Benefit Percentage (1) 10.800%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $3,185.46 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 26,309.54
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 7,412.24 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 13,621.70 Assessable benefit units 143.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $311.27
Maximum Assessment Revenue 44,511.61
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $33,721.78
Proposed Assessment Rate 140.56
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 20,100.08
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (13,621.70)
City Contribution for General Benefit $3,185.46
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

12.7 Assessment Funds
Sugar Plum/Villagio is projected to have a balance of $78,335 on June 30, 2026, which reduces the estimated June 30, 2025 balance of $91,960.

The City will contribute approximately $3,185 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 10.8% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 39

CITRUS HEIGHTS
Assessment District No. 06-02 – Citrus Heights (“Citrus Heights”) was formed in 2005 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

13.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Citrus Heights:
• An alley between the two rows of parcels
• Six streetlights
These improvements are collectively known as the “Citrus Heights Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

13.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Citrus Heights generally consists of property along the alley and bordered by West Ventura Street to the north, South O Street to the east, West Mono Street to the South, and South P Street to the west.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Citrus Heights can be found in Appendix B of this report.

13.3 General Benefit
The Citrus Heights Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Citrus Heights. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 32.7% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 40

13.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Citrus Heights Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $1,200.00
Contractor Costs (2) 0.00
Total Maintenance Costs $1,200.00
County Costs (3) $20.28
City Administrative Overhead (4) 912.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 0.00
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $2,272.28 Total Costs $3,472.28
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (4) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances.. (5) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

13.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

The formation engineer’s report for Citrus Heights included an annual maximum rate inflator that is calculated based on the change in the US City Average CPI-U as of December of each year. The effective increase for 2026/27 was 2.6771%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $125.74 $367.37
2026/27 125.74 377.20
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 41

13.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Citrus Heights Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $3,472.28
General Benefit Percentage (1) 32.700%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $392.40 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 807.60
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 2,272.28 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 1,068.04 Assessable benefit units 16.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $377.20
Maximum Assessment Revenue 6,035.20
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $3,079.88
Proposed Assessment Rate 125.74
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 2,011.84
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) (1,068.04)
City Contribution for General Benefit $392.40
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

The assessment roll showing each parcel’s proposed assessment amount can be found in Appendix A of this report.

13.7 Assessment Funds
Citrus Heights is projected to have a balance of $18,680 on June 30, 2026, which is a slight reduction in the estimated June 30, 2025 balance of $19,750 from the prior fiscal year.

The City will contribute approximately $390 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 32.7% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 42

SIERRA VIEW
Assessment District No. 06-03 – Sierra View (“Sierra View”) was formed in 2006 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. The boundaries and assessment methodology presented in this report were originally developed by the City.

14.1 Plans and Specifications
Below is a list of the improvements funded by the assessments levied upon the parcels in Sierra View:
• Landscaping strips along North Crawford Avenue and around the detention pond • A masonry wall along North Crawford Avenue
• One external streetlight along North Crawford Avenue and three internal streetlights along Lauren Avenue
• A detention pond at the corner of Lauren Avenue and Clora Ann Avenue These improvements are collectively known as the “Sierra View Improvements”. A map of these improvements can be found in Appendix C of this report.

14.2 Boundary Description & Diagram
Sierra View generally consists of property east of North Crawford Avenue and along Lauren Avenue.

A diagram showing the external boundaries of Sierra View can be found in Appendix B of this report.

14.3 General Benefit
The Sierra View Improvements will confer both special and general benefits upon parcels within Sierra View. The City is required to quantify the general benefits, separate them from the special benefits, and fund that portion of the budget representing general benefit through sources other than assessments.

A General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis was prepared by NBS in April of 2017 that estimated the proportion of special and general benefits. The analysis resulted in an estimated 9.9% of general benefit. Therefore, this percentage of the total maintenance budget cannot be funded by the assessments.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 43

14.4 Estimate of Costs
Below is an estimate of the costs needed to fund the Sierra View Improvements for Fiscal Year 2026/27:

Description Estimated Amount
City Maintenance Costs (1) $3,640.00
Contractor Costs (2) 2,000.00
Total Maintenance Costs $5,640.00
County Costs (3) $31.68
City Administrative Overhead (4) 0.00
Consulting/Legal Fees 1,340.00
Fund Balance Adjustment (5) 244.82
Total Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adjustment $1,616.50 Total Costs $7,256.50
(1) Includes Salaries, Repair & Maintenance costs, and Utilities. (2) Third-party maintenance services. Responsible for mowing and edging turf areas, maintaining flowerbeds, keeping hardscape areas clean, and keeping trees raised to contract heights. (3)
(4) The County charges $200 per fund, plus $1 per parcel. Because of the County’s policy of only allowing ten funds per agency, the City combines all but four districts into a single submittal file. As such, the $1 per parcel fee is charged directly to the applicable district, and the $200 fee is spread among the combined districts based on the proportion of parcels levied. (5) Includes City overhead, liability, fire, and risk insurances. (6) If the fund balance shows a deficit, the amount to levy is increased up to the maximum.

14.5 Assessment Methodology and Rates
According to the original engineer’s report, the costs are divided equally among the assessable lots.

The formation engineer’s report for Sierra View included an annual maximum rate inflator that is calculated based on the change in the US City Average CPI-U as of December of each year. The effective increase for 2026/27 was 2.6771%.

The table below shows the current and prior year actual and maximum assessment rates:

Fiscal Year Actual Rate (1) Maximum Rate
2025/26 $276.44 $295.04
2026/27 290.26 302.94
(1) The actual levy will be an even amount, as required by the County.

City of Dinuba
2026/27 Engineer’s Report – Landscape and Lighting Assessment Districts 44

14.6 Assessment of the Estimated Costs
The table below shows the assessment of the estimated costs of the Sierra View Improvements:

Description Estimated Amount
Total Estimated Costs $7,256.50
General Benefit Percentage (1) 9.900%
Maintenance costs to be funded by General Benefit Contribution $558.36 Maintenance costs to be funded by Assessment 5,081.64
Non-Maintenance Costs & Fund Adj. funded by Assessment 1,616.50 Maintenance costs to be funded by District Reserves 0.00 Assessable benefit units 25.00
Maximum Assessment Rate $302.94
Maximum Assessment Revenue 7,573.50
Total Assessment Revenue Needed (2) $6,453.32
Proposed Assessment Rate 290.26
Proposed Assessment Revenue Total 7,256.50
Revenue Capacity / (Shortfall) (3) 803.18
City Contribution for General Benefit $558.36
City Contribution to cover Shortfall 0.00
(1) Percentage estimated in the General Benefit Separation and Quantification Analysis prepared by NBS. (2) Only the special benefit portion of Maintenance Costs are funded through the assessment, but 100% of non-maintenance costs are funded through the assessment because these costs are attributed only to the district. (3) A shortfall (negative value) means that the special benefit portion of the budget cannot be fully funded by the assessments, or a portion is being funded with Reserve funds. A positive value will be collected until Reserve fund has capacity to fund the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the District until December 10, 2026.

14.7 Assessment Funds
Sierra View is projected to have a deficit balance of $2,455 on June 30, 2026, which is a decrease to the estimated June 30, 2025, deficit balance of $3,260.

The City will contribute approximately $560 in non-assessment district funds to cover the 9.9% general benefit portion of the maintenance budget.