02. PH Adopt Reso Adopting 2021-29 Housing Element Update — Downey City Council, February 8, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

I(Q-1-1111111104
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCW_
FROM: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
BY: ALDO E. SCHINDLER, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER / COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 2022
SUBJECT: ADOPT 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND CORRESPONDING

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT INITIAL STUDY/ NEGATIVE

DECLARATION

P P ROVED BY
't,�_xpopi
Pursuant to California State law, each city and county requires a state -certified Housing Element that must be updated and adopted every eight years in accordance with a specific schedule of dates established by the State. The Housing Element must demonstrate the City's ability to accommodate the projected future housing need for the community. The City of Downey's Planning Department contracted the assistance of MIG, Inc., to prepare the 2021- 2029 General Plan Housing Element Update (HEU) in compliance with many State laws that have been adopted in recent years. The HEU covers the planning period of October 15, 2021 through October 15, 2029 and identifies strategies and programs to encourage the development of a variety of housing opportunities for all residents.

M@ " X 'I " A� M a M,
M NJ T.T.

IT40 ir�W i I
Once HCD determines the regional allocation for the So thern California region, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) distributes a RHNA allocation to each city within the region. For this sixth cycle, the City of Downey has a RHNA allocation of 6,525 housing units. Table 2.8 in the Housing Element, and included below for reference, illustrates the income distribution for the City's overall RHNA allocation.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 2
Table 2.8: Rep-ional Housing Needs Allocation 2021-2029 Very Low'
0-50%
2,079
32%
Low
>50-80%
946
14%
Moderate
>80-120%
915
14%
Above Moderate
120%+
2,585
40%
Total
---
6,525
100%
mr, WM- rem re, M.
allo atio is tive times higner than the 2114-2121 Min[AA WOCaTI—OnTF�Z-11ILL-11TURIMM�� more than 18 percent of the City's existing 35,838 units housing stock which has been developed over the course of more than 60 years. The following section summarizes the HEU's objectives and goals in order tackle the current challenge.

I he City must demonstrate in the HEU that its housing plans, policies, and zoning can accommodate 6,525 housing units. This was a challenge due to current built -out conditions within the City. The first step was assessing development projects currently proposed or und review; this approach resulted in a credit of 193 units. The second step was identifying the potential capacity that could be built within the City's existing zoning districts and built environment; this resulted in a credit of 2,779 units. The remaining 3,553 units requires amendments to the City's existing zoning map and development standards to create new housing opportunities in areas that had not previously been considered for housing. When considering new housing opportunities within the community, staff focused on locating housil'o opportunities near transit corridors and maintaining the character of existing residential neighborhoods. I
To meet the remaining need, Residential Overlay Zones will be established along the City's major corridors, Telegraph Road, Paramount Boulevard, Florence Avenue, Imperial Highway, Lakewood Boulevard, and Firestone Boulevard. State regulations require that the Housing Element identify specific sites throughout the City and show that there is potential for development of those sites within the 6 th RHNA cycle. This does not require that these sites be redeveloped but, it is required to show that there is viability for meeting the required RHNA.

The sites inventory identified in Chapter 4 of the Housing Element encompasses sites within L.
o residential znes and sites that require rezoning actions; these sites total 7,414 units, 3,477 unit of which are in the very low- and low-income RHNA categories. Therefore, the City can adequately accommodate the RHNA after rezoning actions are completed. Table 4.5 of the Housing Element update, provided below for reference, shows a shortfall of 517 low-income units but those can be addressed with the surplus of site capacity in the very low-income category.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE i i
i r
PAGE 3
Table I Inventory Summa
1 .
r
i .
r�
a. cull
i

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 4
Figure 4.2: Sites Inventory Map
Base Map Features
Approved Propoed Projects (Credits)
Sites To Be Rezoned
S= Approved or Proposed Projects IM MDRIR3 Sites to Rezone Downey City Boundary
1M Mixed -Use Sites to Rezone
Parks and Open Space
Sites Currently in Place
Commercial Specific Plan Sites to Rezond
Rivers and Waterbodies
Vacant and Underutilized R1
Residential Overlay Sites
�jM Vacant and Underutilized R2
goo Downtown Downey SP Sites
Residential Overlay Zone

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 5
In Chapter 6 of the Housing Element, the Housing Plan, provides goals, policies, and programs for high -quality housing development. These have been established to address housing issues in the City and meet State law housing requirements. These goals and policies were informed by recent community input, the housing needs assessment (Chapter 2 of HEU), housing constraints analysis (Chapter 3 of HEU), housing resources analysis (Chapter 4 of HEU), and the review of program accomplishments from the previous (2014-2021) Housing Element (Chapter 5 of the HEU). Overall, the Housing Plan is made up of five goals, 29 policies, and 35 programs.
during the planning period with appropriate land use and development standards, as well as services and facilities to accommodate the City's share of regional housing need for each income level. The programs address identified housing issues in the City and approaches to meet State law housing requirements. Programs generally include a statement of specific City action(s) necessary to implement a policy or goal and identify the City department or other agency responsible for implementation, the quantified objectives (where applicable), and a timeframe for completion. A summary of quantified objectives is included in the program descriptions of the Housing Plan.

Imlementatioti
The draft HEU was submitted to HCD for review on September 15, 2021 and a response with comments from HCD was received on November 10, 2021. Primarily, most comments from HCD identified a need for additional justification and reasoning for different components of the element, such as the sites inventory, constraints, and additional specification for timelines of various programs. Staff addressed the comments provided by HCD and resubmitted the document to HCD for final review on December 22, 2021.

On January 19, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to review Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 21-3158, by a 4-0-1 vote with one commi . ssi . oner abstaining and the remaining four in favor. The Resolution recommends that the City Council adopt the General Plan Amendment for the 2021-2029 Housing Element and corresponding Initial Study/Negative Declaration.

After adoption and certification of the Housing Element Update, there will be need for a secondary phase where the programs adopted in the Housing Element will need to be implemented. The most notable will be the General Plan and Zoning amendments to apply a residential overlay on major commercial corridors within the City. This phase will include the establishment of development standards specifically for corridors to identify allowable building heights, building articulation, and design standards. These amendments will incorporate public comments and be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration and action.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 6
MIMM
Public participation plays a key role in the development of all City actions, and -efforts were made for that to remain true during this Housing Element update. Public outreach not only included residents, but also coordinated participation among local agencies and housing groups, community organizations, and housing sponsors. A list of agencies and organizations • to the workshop are listed in Appendix A • the Housing Element and •-• • 100 groups and agencies working with special needs groups, civic and religious groups and housing developers and • •
Staff hosted two • workshops, one Planning Commission study • and • presentation for Planning Commission recommendation. The community workshops were held on December 17, 2020 and June 14, 2021. The Planning Commission study session was held on December 15, 2021. The community workshops were held virtually via webcam due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the City was precluded from hosting traditional in -person meetings, there was a positive turn -out of 116 participants over both virtual meetings. In addition • the • meetings, individuals were also given an t••• to participate via an online survey. A City webpage was exclusively dedicated to the Housing Element allowing individuals to •• up-to-date information and •• including information for how to participate.
• Need for affordable housing
• Consideration for vulnerable populations
• Housing near transit and transit -oriented development • Continue support of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU)
• c..•f climate change issues and resilience
• • safety, and traffic concerns
• Property rehabilitation
• Further Fair Housing
• Preferred locating new housing along major corridors and large retail spaces, instead • zones.
• Having a future orientation to support young people growing up in Downey and young families • want to stay in the City.
• •••.. • income and rent -burdened households
� NO
-one
Ql" Nippy". OWN! 01010'81�*P_ "I
T1-111dW-1W6,"J#rWrr I A I
Move servea as
all programs within the Element.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 7
r 1 r-�Wt Lei I V001
A. Consistency. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with all other goals, policies, programs, and land uses of applicable elements of the General Pla The project is in conformance with all other applicable objectives, policies, and programs specified in the City's General Plan. Additional general plan amendments and zone changes will be executed in order to meet the policies and goals of the Housing Element Update. Staff will continue to ensure that those actions remain consistent with the overall General Plan. In addition, in order for the City to remain in compliance with state law governing the overall General Plan and Housing Element, the City is required to perform periodical updates every eight years. State law requires the housing element to address the following key topics: 1) housing needs, 2) constraints to housing development, 3) housing resources, and 4) housing plan. The Housing Element will be in strict conformance with the previous four topics. The following are current policies promoted b the proposed General Plan Amendment: I
Policy 1. 1. 2 -
Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the City's future population growth.

Program 1. 1. 2. 1. -
Identify areas to absorb population growth and support additional housing.

Program 1. 1. 2.2. -
Designate parts of the City as second unit development areas to absorb the need for addonal housing.

Program 1. 1. 2.3. -
Promote housing projects and mixed -use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit - oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Landing project.

Goal 1.2.-
Advance livable community concepts.

Policy 1. 2. 1. -
Promote livable communities concepts that allow added flexibility in addressing land use needs.

Program 1. 2.1.2. -
Promote mixed -use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips by vehicles.

Policy 1. 2.2 —
Focus on areas where livable communities concepts are most likely [to] have the most impact to set a catalyst for similar projects elsewhere in the city.

Program 1.2.2.4 -
Use the development of the Downey Landing as a catalyst for further economic development, including housing, on properties along the periphery of the site.

I leirtmol 14 Lei NMI 0 0 1 1 0 9 0 0 0 - 0

G GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 8
I he information received at these meetings was incorporated into the proposea aocume t.

Lastly, the workshop, surveys, and all outreach material was accessible to both English and Spanish speakers.

Goal 1. 4 - Protect and enhance the residential neighborhoods.

Policy 1. 4.2. - Promote residential construction that complements existing neighborhoods.

Program 1. 4.2. 1. - Discourage residential construction not in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood.

Future development resulting from the goals of the proposed Housing Element will occur along the City's major corridors and large commercial spaces where it is more compatible with high density development. The City's Single-family (R-1) neighborhoods will remain largely the same in terms of character. The R-1 neighborhoods are well established and are part of the City's identity making up 57. 1 % of all homes. It remains a priority to preserve that identity. Ultimately, single-family lots will more appropriately help meet housing needs by increasing housing stock via ADUs.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATZ FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 9
B. Adverse Effects. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the surrounding environment.

The Housing Element Update only establishes a regulatory environment that supports and encourages housing production. Therefore, no projects are authorized or approved by this action. Future projects, including zone text amendments and new housing units, will be evaluated through the appropriate review process, and potentially subject to further environmental review.

The Housing Element was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Again, because no physical construction is proposed, the analysis is based on a hypothetical development scenario for the Inventory Sites identified in the Housing Element and how construction and operation of those sites may result in impacts to the environment. The Initial Study determined that the Housing Element would result in a "less than significant impact." Therefore, a Negative Declaration is proposed for adoption.

C. Public Health, Safety and Welfare. The proposed General Plan Amendment promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of this article.

The goals and policies found within the proposed Housing Element include: providing housing at all income levels, providing housing specifically for vulnerable populations, rehabilitation of existing homes, providing education and resources for homeownership, neighborhood preservation, and affirmatively furthering fair housing. These types of policies fundamentally and inherently promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. In terms of future development, through the sites inventory analysis a heavy emphasis was placed in determining where future development would bl� most appropriate in relation to nearby is uses.

D. Conflicts. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not conflict with provisions of this article, including the City's subdivision ordinance.

Approval of the Housing Element does not alter any provisions of the Downey Municipal Code, including the City's subdivision ordinance. Rather zoning text amendments will follow in order to achieve the goals and policies out lined in the adopted Hosing Element.

The purpose of the Downey Municipal Code is to be in accordance with the comprehensive General Plan.

I =1 L VA 1 :0] L1 I J� 14 Z I if -,I V-11 0
In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study of environmental impacts was prepared for the proposed project and resulted in a Negative Declaration. This environmental review is analyzed at a "program level", rather than at a "project level" because there is no request for physical development, and the proposed Housing Element remains consistent with the other elements found within the City's General Plan at this time. Therefore, this environmental review tiers off of the City's broader General Plan Environmental Impact Report. However, future development and changes to the General Plan as a result of the Housing Element Update may be subject to a new and separate CEQA review process.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT — 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 8, 2022
PAGE 10
The initial study finds that the project would have "less than significant impacts", and a Negativz Declaration will be filed. A copy of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) is attached to this report as Attachment G. A 30-day public comment period for the proposed IS/ND was provided starting November 1, 2021 and ended on November 30, 2021.

Efficiency & Adaptability
Public •_•'
Quality of Life, Neighborhood and Infrastructurt

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A — City Council Resolution
Attachment B — 6 th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element
Attachment C — HCD Letter dated November 10, 2021 and City Responses Attachment D — Initial Study/Negative Declaration
Attachment E — Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-3158 Attachment F — • Commission Staff Report

Attachment ""

WHEREAS, on January 27, 2022, • • the pending • hearing was published in the Downey Patriot as a 1/8th page ad in accordance with the requirements of the Downey • •• and,
1KNORILTAVOI& U-4 M6
a =-11W No=
the General Plan and Negative Declaration.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOWNEY DOES HEREBY • AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council finds, determines and declares the requested General Plan Amendment, after preparing an Initial Study in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, found that the General Plan Amendment (project) will have "less than significant impacts" because there is no request for physical development, and the HEU remains consistent with other elements found in the City's General Plan. A Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance to the findings in the Initial Study.

SECTION 2. Having further considered all of the oral and written evidence presented to it at • public hearing, the City Council • the City •' i• further finds, determines and ieclares that:
1 . The project is in conformance with all • applicable objectives, policies, and programs specified in the City's General Plan. Additional general plan amendments and zone changes will be executed in order to meet the policies and goals of the Housing Element Update. The City will continue to ensure that those actions remain consistent with the overall General Plan. In addition, in order for the City to remain in compliance with state law governing the • General Plan and Housing Element, the City is required to perform periodical updates every eight years. State law requires the housing element to address the following key topics: 1) housing needs, 2) constraints to housing development, 3) housing resources, and 4) housing plan.

The Housing Element will be in strict conformance with the previous four topics. The following are current policies promoted by the proposed General Plan Amendment:

Policy Provide an appropriate amount of land area to absorb the City's future population growth.

Program 1. 1. 2. 1. - Identify areas to absorb population growth and support additional housing.

Program 1. 1. 2.2. - Designate parts • the City as second unit development areas to absorb the need for additional housing.

Program 1. 1. 2.3. - Promote housing projects and mixed -use projects that include housing within areas designated for the downtown area, transit - oriented developments, and areas in the vicinity of the Downey Landing project.

Goal 1. 2. - Advance livable community concepts.

Policy 1. 2. 1. - Promote livable communities concepts that allow added flexibility in addressing land use needs.

Program 1.2.1.2.- Promote mixed -use developments with housing on the same site or in proximity to commercial services to reduce the need for trips • vehicles.

Policy 1. 2.2 — Focus on areas where livable communities concepts are most

likely [to] have the most impact to set a catalyst for similar projec elsewhere in the city.

Program 1. 2.2.4 - Use the development of the Downey Landing as a catalyst for further economic development, including housing, on properties along the periphery of the site.

One of the key topics of the Housing Element is addressing housing needs and accommodating the 6,525 units stipulated by the State's RHNA. As a part of assessing the City's housing needs, a sites inventory was performed to identify the specific parcels that can best fit increased densities. The majority of those sites are found along the City's main traffic corridors. This includes large commercial sites such as the Stonewood Mall, Downey Promenade, and Downey Landing. These developments are encouraged to utilize a mixed -use component. In addition, new mixed -use zoning and overlays will be proposed as a result of the Housing Elemen in an effort to implement the City's existing Mixed -use General Plan Designation.

Lastly, the Housing Element will continue to comply with State regulations related t Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU), formerly known as Second Unit Developments. It estimated that 930 ADUs will be constructed during this Housing Element cycle.

Policy 1. 3.2. — Monitor and address changes in land use trends.

Program 1. 3.2. 1. - Adopt a comprehensive update of the zoning chapter of the municipal code.

Program 1. 3.2.2. - Adjust the codes, policies, and regulations in response to changes in land use trends.

New and evolving development is continuously introduced into the city, and it remains a responsibility to analyze and determine the viability of these changes in the City of Downey. Some land use changes and trends discussed in the Housing Element aim to address low housing stock, affordability, and development constraints. As a result, there will be future Zone Text Amendments and General Plan amendments. These amendments include implementation of the City's Mixed - use General Plan Designation, increase in housing density, and if viable inclusionary housing policies.

Policy 1. 4. 1. - Promote Neighborhood Identity.

Program 1. 4.1.4. - Promote public participation in the planning process. 'zwr.rr, 1.4.1.5.- Provide ' Ilic information on wa_�,js residents %ejjr, owners can improve their neighborhoods.

Public participation was vital in drafting the proposed documents. The City held two separate public outreach workshops and a Planning Commission Study Session where residents were invited to attend and share their thoughts. In addition to community meetings, residents and stakeholders could also provide input via a community survey and receive information via the Housing Element webpage. At the community meetings, residents were introduced to the intent of the Housing Element and the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Participants shared thoughts mm Ow" sustainabilftypXarkinoiltraffic u-oi-*,,ort for ADUs and resources for vulnerable residents. The information received at these meetings was incorporated into the proposed document. Lastly, the workshop, surveys, and all outreach material was accessible to both English and Spanish speakers.

Goal 1.4 - Protect and enhance the residential neighborhoods.

Policy 1. 4.2. - Promote residential construction that complements existil neighborhoods.

IN 0
W.WeVE,

2. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties or the surrounding environment because the Housing Element Update only establishes a regulatory environment that supports and encourages housing production. Therefore, no projects are authorized or approved by this action. Future projects, including zone text amendments and new housing units, will be evaluated through the appropriate review process, and potentially subject to further environmental review. The Housing Element was reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. No physical construction is proposed, the analysis is based on a hypothetical development scenario for the Inventory Sites identified in the Housing Element and how construction and operation of those sites may result in impacts to the environment. The Initial Study determined that the Housing Element Update would result in a "less than significant impact." Therefore, a Negative Declaration is proposed for adoption.

3. The proposed General Plan Amendment promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of the Downey Municipal Code.

Specifically, the goals and policies found within the Housing Element Update include, providing housing at all income levels, providing housing specifically for vulnerable populations, rehabilitation of existing homes, providing education and resources for homeownership, neighborhood preservation, and affirmatively furthering fair housing.

These types of policies fundamentally and inherently promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. In terms of future development, through the sites inventory analysis a heavy emphasis was placed in determining where future development would be most appropriate in relation to nearby land uses.

5. Based on factors such as the age and condition of existing uses, the site land versus improvement value, lack of recent enhancements to existing uses, increased development intensity potential, and development interest, the existing uses on the sites identified in the site inventory to accommodate the lower income RHNA are likely to be discontinued during the planning period, and therefore do not constitute an impediment to additional residential development during the period covered by the housing element.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of thiii Ordinance is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one more sections, subsections, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. I

SECTION 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Resolution, the City Council of the City of Downey hereby adopts the General Plan Amendment and Negative Declaration (PLN-21-00139), thereby adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update for the sixth housing cycle.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 202Z
Blanca Pacheco, Mayor
Maria Alicia Duarte, CMC
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SS

CITY OF DOWNEY
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 22- was adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Downey held on the -t' day of _, 2022, by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

Council Members:

NOES:

Council Member:

ABSENT:

Council Member:

ABSTAIN,
Council Member:

I FURTHER CERTIFY that a summary of the foregoing Resolution No. 22- was published in the Downey Patriot, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Downey, on —, 2022 (after adoption including the vote thereon). It was also posted in the Regular posting places in the City of Downey on the same dates.

Maria Alicia Duarte, CMC
City Clerk

x ' �tt3Nt&v e
1 �.............e
ass",-hl
1 This page left intentionally blank.

Regulatory Framework .......................................... 1'I Scope and Content ofthe Housing Element ............. --1'2 Relationship to Other General Plan Bement --1'3
PublicParticipation ........................................... ~~~~._~+^~......... ^~~-_~-_-~^.—.~a^^.~~.°_~........ I'4 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (4FFH)......... ............. ....... ........... ___"____.... l'11 Chapter 2, ConomunityProf|e/Hmusing Needs Assessment ..................... ~^�_~�__~___~~^~^~^~__.,2-1 PopulationandEmp|oymentTrends--- 2,1
Household Characteristics ................................. 3-4 Housing Stock Characteristics ........ 2'7
Special Housing Needs ....................... ....... __ ......... ...... ............... 2'9 Energy Conservation Opportunities 2'13
At -Risk Housing Analysis ........... ......... ,~~_._,,^°~~,_,^ ............. ..... _,.~'+_.~...... °___,,~^__~^2'13 Non -Governmental Constraints ........

Govennmenta|Constroints-----. __ ......... ........ ...... __ ...... 3'5 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing3'27
Environmental [nnsLnaints____^...... ._n,^___^._°....... ........ ........ _..~-_^_~,3-58 Housing imDown . 4'1
Regional Housing Needs Asnessment~~............... _~_~............. _.^^...... ... 4'3 Approved and Proposed Projects ...... ......... ....... ....... _=........ ...... ,,_^_~,_=4-3 Residential Sites Inventory .......................... _~.-~~-^_-_~~_,__,"........... _~_~,_~_`=~,^_",_._~-4-4 Sites tnBeRezoned 4'1#
------'--'---.--^___w-`_..^.---�-_�_--�-_'--.--..-^r_�-_-

Chapter6. Housing Plan..~......,,,,.....~...,.,...... 6-1 Goal and Policies --------..6-2
Implementing Programs---....

Summary ofQuantified Ob]ectivea._ _",°__,_,__.,~_=__.~_....... ............ G-25 Appendix A. Public Outreach
Summary, Community Workshop #1
Summary, Community Workshop #1
Summary, Community Survey
Outreach List
Summary of City Edits/Response to HCD Findings
Appendix B. Sites Inventory Table

promoting the production of safe, decent, and affordable housing for all community residents. The across the State. The dire housing situation in California has resulted in:

Local factors have also impacted housing development. in Downey, lack of undeveloped land, high land prices, open space deficits, and productive industrial uses that are incompatible with residential neighborhoods have limited opportunities for new residential development. Nonetheless, the City is fully committed tndoing its part toaddress the StaYe'shousing crisis and will continue tomake every effort to increase housing capacity and supply in Downey. The City continues to plan for future growth — specifically new residential development —through major planning efforts, like the Downtown Downey Specific Plan.

With this Element, the City is implementing a plan that embraces new opportunities,supports housing development, and provides diverse housing options. Realizing that new housing opportunities for all income levels isdifficult toachieve, the City will follow adoption ofthe Housing Element with a comprehensive General Plan land use update that rethinks residential development opportunities throughout the City. Moving forward, the City will provide for a diversity of housing in expanded geographic locations throughout the City but also by using creative solutions to support housing development throughout the community.

of existing and future residents can be met. State law requires that all cities adopt a Housing Element and describes in detail the necessary contents of the Housing Element. California planning law provides more detailed requirements for the Housing Element than for any other General Plan element. This Housing Element responds to those requirements and responds specifically to conditions and policy directives unique to Downey.

The California Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian asthe sta1esmain housing goal. Recognizing the important part that local planning programs play in pursuit of this goal, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element as part of their comprehensive General Plans. Section 65581 of the California Government Code reflects the legislative intent for mandating that each city and county prepare Housing Element:
1' To ensure that counties and cities recognize their responsibilities in contributing to the attainment ofthe State housing goal

2. To ensure that counties and cities will prepare and implement housing elements which, along with federal and state programs, will move toward attainment of the state housing goals

3. To recognize that each locality is best capable of determining what efforts are required by it to contribute to the attainment ofthe state housing goal, provided such adetermination is compatible with the state housing goal and regional housing needs

4. To ensure that each local government cooperates with other local governments to address regional housing needs
The Housing Element covers the planning period of October 15, 2021 through October 15, 2029 and identifies strategies and programs to: 1) encourage the development of a variety of housing opportunities; 2) provide housing opportunities for persons oflower and moderate incomes; 3) preserve the quality of the existing housing stock in Downey; 4) minimize governmental constraints; and5) promote equal housing opportunities for all residents.

Toward these ends, the Housing Element consists of:
0 Anintroduction ofthe scope and purpose ofthe Housing Element a Ananalysis ofthe [itvsdemographic and housing characteristics and trends 0 A review of potential market, governmental, and environmental constraints to meeting the Cit/sidentified housing needs
w An evaluation of land, administrative, and financial resources available to address the housing goals
0 Areview ofpast accomplishments under the previous Housing Element 0 A Housing Plan to address the identified housing needs, including housing goals, policies, and programs
1-2 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

The Housing Element is also closely related to the Zoning Regulations and assesses multiple ordinances and Zoning Regulations sections that pertain to housing for compliance with State law. As new ordinances are considered, the City will review the Housing Element to ensure compliance with housing State law requires that the General Plan and all individual elements collectively form an "integrated, internally consistent, and compatible statement ofpo|icies."The goals, policies, and programs of this Housing Element are consistent with the goals, policies, and programs contained in other elements of the Downey General Plan.

Development policies contained in the Lend Use Element —which establishes the location, type, density, and distribution of local land uses, including housing —most directly relate tothe Housing Element.

When any element of the General Plan is amended, the City will review the Housing Element and if necessary, prepare an amendment to ensure continued consistency among elements. State law requires that upon revisions to the Housing Element, the Safety and Conservation Elements include an analysis and policies regarding flood hazard and management information.

Several new laws trigger additional General Plan update requirements upon revision of the Housing Element.
� SB 244 requires that before the due date for adoption of the next Housing Element after January 1, 2012, the General Plan Land Use Element must be updated to identify and describe disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUC) that exists within the city's sphere of influence (SOI). Disadvantaged communities both within the City and its SCI have been identified and policy has been prepared toaddress environmental justice issues. � SB 379 requires that, upon the next revision of a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) on or after 1/1/2817,oronorbefore 1/1/2Q22,ifajurisdiction has not adopted aLHK8P,the Safety Element (and other elements as needed) must be updated to address climate resiliency. � SB 1241 and SB 1000 require the General Plan Safety Element, upon the next revision of the Housing Element on or after January 1, 2014, to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address the risk offire and flooding.
� S8180Qalso requires local jurisdictions toadd an Environmental Justice element urpolicies to their General Plans and is required in General Plans when two or more elements are updated beginning January 1,IO18.

The City will follow adoption of the Housing Element that will include a comprehensive General Plan land use update and updates to all required parts of the Plan. As such, information on flood hazard, flood management, fire hazards, disadvantaged communities, and environmental justice issues will be updated.

The Housing Element must reflect the values and
preferences of the Downey community; therefore,
public participation plays a role in the development
of this Element. Section 65583(c)(6)(B) of the
Government Code states: "The local government
shall make diligent effort to achieve public
participation of all economic segments of the
community in the development of the housing
element, and the program shall describe this
effort." This process not only includes residents of
the community, but also coordinates participation
among local agencies and housing groups,
community organizations, and housing sponsors.

Community outreach for the Housing Element
update included two workshops, a community
survey, and a webpage for the Housing Element Update were initiated. Outreach for the sixth cycle Housing Element was challenging because much of the update process occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions on public gatherings prevented the city from holding traditional public workshops. Instead, the city utilized online engagement tools, including an online survey, social media posts and online documents to provide opportunities for the community to share their feedback.

Following guidance from public health agencies regarding public gatherings and COVID-19, all workshops and meetings were held virtually using online video conferencing (Zoom). The workshop, surveys, and all outreach material was accessible to both English and Spanish speakers.

Many of these themes and comments that have emerged from the outreach efforts have been incorporated in the Housing Plan through programs that promote ADU development, includes actions to review and revise key parts of the City's development standards. The comments also support the City's approach to the sites inventory which expands opportunities for multi -family housing, including affordable housing, in more locations throughout the City. City alnowney Concerns about housing cost and aid to struggling residents has TALLER been taken into consideration through the various programs I I VIRTUAL that include emergency mortgage and rent assistance and a L I I housing rebate and grant program to address code
enforcement issues and programs that aim to increase
affordable housing development through regulatory incentives. 3MMEEMMIUMMIM
On December 17, 2020, the City conducted a community
workshop to gather input from key local stakeholders, housing advocates, and residents. The meeting included a PowerPoint presentation about the intent of the Housing Element update and Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), opportunities to meet local housing needs, and creative approaches to address the City's constraints to housing production, which was

EIMV y
We want to hear
from you!
.nnn e. Aa � x4rg pimn thus eznp•=e�-0: en
f5 Grg Elcrn.� Il;�ieal VdnrksP�u�p
followed by a facilitated discussion regarding housing issues. The workshop had 58 attendees. To ensure that the housing concerns of low- and moderate -income and special needs residents were addressed, the City notified agencies and organizations that serve these communities in Downey and surrounding areas. The list of agencies and organizations invited to the workshop are listed in Appendix A and included over 100 groups and agencies working with special needs groups, civic and religious groups and housing developers and local businesses. Outreach for the workshop was conducted in English and Spanish using flyers, social media posts, direct mail to a stakeholder list and to an email list with over 20,000 contacts form the City's Park and Recreation Department.

Press releases/notification of the workshop were sent to local media outlets and the Downey Chamber of Commerce members. f Information was posted on the General Plan/Housing Element website. The community workshops had dedicated Spanish
breakout rooms where the presentation and discussion were conducted in Spanish. A summary of the workshop is provided in Appendix A.

Community input included:
• The need for more affordable, multi -family housing
• Consider residents first, especially most vulnerable
• Housing near transit and transit -oriented development • Revisit City zoning code and land use planning policies • Less restrictive development standards
• Supporting Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) and tiny house development • Address climate change issues and resilience
• Parking, safety, and traffic concerns
• Potential negative effects of freeway expansion on Downey neighborhoods The City of Downey developed a community survey to
gather feedback for the 2021-2029 Housing Element
Update from Downey residents, workers, property
owners and others interested in housing issues in the
city. The survey was posted on the City of Downey's
website, from December 18, 2020 to January 29,
2021, and available in both English and Spanish.

Weekly social media posts encouraged the Downey
community to participate. The survey received a total
of 991 responses; 54 surveys (5.4%) were completed
using the Spanish language version of the survey.

Approximately two-thirds of respondents (62.0%) were homeowners, and one-third (33.2%) renters.

Nearly five percent (4.8%) lived with friends and family and/or did not have a permanent home.

Survey findings included:

• Half of respondents said they commuted more than ten miles to work. • More than half said they lived in Downey due to close distance to family and friends (55.2%) and the schools (54.2%).
• One in four respondents (27.5%) said they struggled to pay their rent or mortgage since the coronavirus outbreak.
• Some of the most important housing challenges to respondents included ensuring that children who grow up in Downey can afford to live in the City on their own; encouraging rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods; supporting homeowners at risk of mortgage default to keep their homes; and targeting efforts to address long-term inequities in the housing market, including discrimination in renting.
• Respondents considered acknowledging the traffic impacts of new housing development, balancing development across the City, and looking at transit -oriented development opportunities as the most important approaches for deciding where to allow new housing in Downey.
• Locating new housing along major corridors, within existing commercial shopping centers, or in hotels or motels that can be converted to housing were considered more favorable locations by more respondents than increasing the number of housing units in single family neighborhoods.

See Appendix C for a survey summary.

On June 14, 2021, the City conducted a community
workshop to gather feedback on the Public Review
Draft Housing Element from key local
stakeholders, housing advocates, and residents.

The meeting included a PowerPoint presentation
presenting key portions of the 2021-2029 Housing
Element, including site suggestions and programs
the City will undertake to address housing issues in
Downey and to meet State law housing
requirements. The workshop had 58 attendees
and included a dedicated Spanish breakout room
where the presentation was conducted in Spanish,
however there were no attendees who chose to
participate in Spanish. Both English and Spanish
versions of the presentations were recorded and
posted to the City's website for residents not able
to make the meeting. To ensure that the housing
concerns of low- and moderate -income and
special needs residents were addressed, the City
notified agencies and organizations that serve
Housing Element Community Workshop:.

SHARE Yf THOUGHTS
these communities in Downey and surrounding
��.E�tm=:
42 9�pAil�¢"'.'tly NS%Ym"'4ryk wa=. sr yYw Fti�
�rt`r4^a d`ek'4R MT
areas. The list of agencies and organizations
R.s..';ri .
g,`��aaPo*Wk
invited to listed in Appendix.
the workshop are
Outreach for the workshop was conducted in
English and Spanish using flyers, social media posts,
and direct mail to a stakeholder list.

Below is a summary of themes from the workshop, and screenshots of the notes taken during the meeting.

Key themes emerged during the discussion, including:
m Expand availability ofaffordable, multi -family housing • Encourage development near transit corridors
* Parking, traffic, and overcrowding concerns
* Having a future orientation to support young people growing up in Downey and young families who want tostay inthe City
m Balancing the needs uflong-time homeowners and renters • More support needed for lower income, rent -burdened households 0 Address growing climate impacts
When asked about how the City might encourage more housing development in Downey, recommendations from the group included:
w Reduce orremove parking requirements
• Support pooled parking opportunities for developments °, Encourage development along transit corridors and expanding bike infrastructure • Support tiny home development tohelp alleviate homelessness • Explore how rezoning might encourage more affordable developments • Ensure long-term affordability covenants omhousing
• Focus new multi -family developments inareas with lower impacts • Seek more input from undepvepresented groups
Further opportunity for public participation will be provided at Planning Commission and City Council adoption hearings expected to occur Fall 2021.

The Los Angeles chapter of the Urban Land Institute (ULI-LA) offered the City the opportunity to conduct meaningful outreach to the development community around the policy and zoning changes proposed in theHousin0E|ement.TheUL|'LAfor"ufficehouo"aUovvedcitystafftointeractm/ithUL|vo|unteemvvho have expertise on various aspects of housing development — including economics and market analysis, development of market -rate and affordable housing, entitlements and land use consulting, architecture, and design -- and answer questions. These sessions were intended tofill a critical gap in public -private sector interaction around housing policy, by allowing cities to receive customized, one-on-one feedback onkey issues from expert practitioners inaneutral advisory setting.

The City used the ULI Office hours to seek guidance from the development community to fully assess constraints and viability ofpotential inventory sites byestablishing a review process with the UL| group.

The City held four virtual meetings with a subcommittee of the ULI group made up of a variety of large- scalehousingdeve|openxvbospeciaUzeinmarketrateandeffordab|ehousin8deve|opments.RegardinB the viability of potential sites that were reviewed, feedback from the group focused significantly on the surrounding uses. The ULI group was interested in the proximity to grocery stores, shopping centers, existing multi -family housing development; these factors increased the "attractive" nature of the sites and viability for development, in addition to the proposed re -zoning and increased density on the potential inventory sites

After aseries ofmeetings, several ofthe suggestions hromtheUUpone|havebeenfu|dedintoanactkm item in the Housing Plan. Program 1.3 includes an action item to review and, if needed, revise residential developments standards with afocus on minimum lot area requirements and building height limits in the R-3 zoning district and minimum unit sizes for all residential development.

On]uly 19, 2021,the Affordable Housing City Council Subcommittee held aspecial meeting 1odiscuss the Housing Element update process and discuss the potential for adoption of an inclusionary housing requirements. The public was invited to the meeting and the agenda was posted prior to the meeting on the City's website, City Hall, the Downey Library, and Barbara J. Riley Center (community center). No public comments were received.
18 CftyofDowney
-

YOU ARE INVITED
[STAN INKADOS
��~�� HOUSING ELEMENT
��u�� mo��/m��mm��u
DECEMBER15
��T0[V��0A
�U�|
� m�
�m�� STUDY �TU�.��
.~ -°°~,
��UND[�T�|D

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
��
On December 15, 2021, the City held a study session with the City of Downey Planning Commission to discuss the
Housing Element update and the proposed revisions to
the Housing Element prior to resubmittal of the revised Draft Housing Element to HCD. The study session was
advertised on the City's social media platforms
(Facebook, instagram, Nextdoor and Twitter), in the
Downey Patriot and Downey Latino local newspapers,
and on the City's website. To ensure that the housing
organizations invited to the study session are listed in Appendix. To increase participation from the Downey
community, the City sent email notifications to the stakeholders list, participants of previous workshops, multi -family property owners, the Clergy Council, rent control advocates, and a park and recreation The meeting included a PowerPoint presentation presenting the Housing Element updated process, public outreach efforts, key portions of the 2021-2029 Housing Element, and proposed revisions to the Draft Housing Element. No public comments were received. businesses. Outreach for the workshop was conducted in English and Spanish using flyers, social media posts, direct mail to a stakeholder list.

The following actions were undertaken toadvertise the
Draft Housing Element for public review: Cityofbowney
2021-2029
� The Draft Housing Element was posted ontheFELDEtMENTO HOKS\NG ELEM��
City'sdedicated Housing Element m/ebsite. DEV|V|EWDAPR8U0|NAR Comments were submitted through adedicated

TO REVIEW THE DIGITS HOUSING PLAN DEVELOPED FROM COMMUNITY INPUT form available onthe vvebskeand through email
orwritten correspondence sent directly tothe VISIT OUR WERPACE AT: V11V1V.D0WNEYCA.0RG/KEUPDA1E � Email notices inthe form ofadigital flyer were
distributed to �
o Acomprehensive list ofstakeholdershas
such asagencies and organizations that
serve the Downey community and mommoulmmmm
surrounding areas and many which serve special needs and|oweHncome communities (see list inAppendix A)
o Previous workshop participants and individuals expressing interest in the Housing Element update process
o The Cit/sCity Council housing issue contact list
o Local clergy contacts
o Multi -family property owners
• The Parks and Recreation Department sent emai|s (email blast) to all residents intheir email distribution list (with over 2U,0UUcontaots).
• The Draft Housing Element was also advertised in the City'ssuda| media platform such as Facebookand |ns1a8naminboth English and Spanish.
• The Downey Police Department posted digital flyers (English and Spanish) on the Nextdoor, a neigh borhood-level communications app, and sent to Neighborhood Watch groups m The flyer notices were published inthe Downey Patriot newspaper.

General comments received asnfSeptember 14, 2021indude:
• Reluctance to add additional housing capacity in the City due to traffic concerns • Limiting new multi -family developments to main corridors to limit neighborhood impacts from new development and tonot rezone single-family neighborhood w Concerns about government -subsidized housing
• The need tobetter utilize freeway right ofway for other land use, commercial centers for mixed -use development, additional security in underground parking areas, and traffic concerns • The desire tokeep the market rate under control bybanning short term rentals unless they are owner -occupied more than Q5percent ofthe year.
• The expensive housing market in Downey and the desire for a more robust housing policy to address the lack ofaffordable housing for current and future residents. • The need for housing types beyond single-family, the needs for housing affordable to "middle dassindividua|sandfami|ies"suchascondosanddup|exes,andtheadditionofmu|tifami|y housing inareas with "dying businesses" such asthe StonevvoodMail.

In December, 2021, a revised draft of the Housing
Element was resubmitted to HCD (Department of Housing
and Community Development) with revisions which
addressed HCD's findings letter from November 10, 2021.

The letter identified findings related to the need for
additional analysis in various parts of the Element. The HCD findings letter and a table summarizing HCD findings and the City's responses/revisions to each comment is
included in Appendix A. For 10 days prior to submittal, the Element revisions were made a vailable to the public for comment and input.

The following actions were undertaken to advertise the
Revised Draft Housing Element for public review:
• The Revised Draft Housing Element was posted on the
City's dedicated Housing Element website and hard copies were displayed at the City's Barbara J. Riley Community & Senior Center and at the public counter in Downey City Hall. Comments were submitted through a daily -monitored email ([email protected]) or written correspondence sent directly to the City.
• Email notices in the form of a digital flyer were distributed to o A comprehensive list of stakeholders such as agencies and organizations that serve the Downey community and surrounding areas and many which serve special needs and lower -income communities (see list in Appendix A)
o Previous workshop participants and individuals expressing interest in the Housing Element update process
o The City's City Council housing issue contact list
o Local clergy contacts
o Multi -family property owners
o Downey Police Department's Neighborhood Watch groups
• The Parks and Recreation Department sent emails (email blast) to all residents in their email distribution list (with over 20,000 contacts).
• The Draft Housing Element was also advertised in the City's social media platform such as Facebook and Instagram in both English and Spanish.

The following comments were received:
• Our Future Los Angeles, a countywide coalition of advocates and labor leaders in Los Angeles County. Submitted a comment letter that requested the City add more protection for tenants, adopt a rent Stabilization Ordinance, prioritize rezoning in high resource areas, and prioritize affordable housing through mechanisms such as an inclusionary housing ordinance. The letter also expressed that the City has overestimated ADU production. In the revised Draft Housing Element, resubmitted to HCD for a second round of review, ADU estimates have been scaled back. The City is also moving forward with exploratory action that evaluates the adoption of an inclusionary housing ordinance through meetings with the City Council Affordable Housing Subcommittee. The 2021-2029 Housing Element includes a strategy to increase housing opportunities in all parts of the City through a rezoning program that not only increase capacity

inhigher density and mixed -use areas, also along the [itysmajor commercial corridors and commercial centers though aresidential overlay zone that will allow high -density housing development at a minimum density of 30 units per acre. The strategy adds residential capacity to non-residential areas and will address disproportionate need without the risk of displacement ofresidents and improves fair housing and equal opportunity conditions.

An additional public comment was received and included a request for a specific property to be included in the Residential Overlay described in Chapter 4. The site is included in the residential overlay but not included asanidentified site inthis Housing Element due tothe combination of site size (under half an acre) and existing use (commercial property with two residential units).

Nevertheless, interest in the Residential Overlay will be taken into consideration during the subsequent the General Plan and Zoning update and this property may be included as a site in subsequent edits ofthis Housing Element.

State law requires that the preparation, adoption, and implementation of a housing element includes a diligent effort to include public participation from all economic segments of the community. A diligent effort means going beyond simply giving the public an opportunity to provide input and should be proactively and broadly conducted through avariety ofmethods to assure access and participation. As part of the Housing Element update, the City of Downey proactively engaged the community through a variety of avenues including digital/social media outreach, a community survey, community workshops, and direct email to stakeholder groups. To ensure all residents regardless of language spoken were included, all meetings, advertisements, flyers, and surveys were available in Spanish.

The results of the workshop and survey findings relevant to the AFFH analysis include the following issues — which are discussed in more detail under the AFFH section in Chapter 3 and in the Housing Plan (Chapter 6, specifically Program 5.2):
• Housing Cost is anissue tomany residents:
o One in four respondents (27.5%) said they struggled to pay their rent or mortgage since the coronavirusoutbreak.
o Some of the most important housing challenges to respondents included ensuring that children who grow up in Downey can afford to live in the City on their own; encouraging rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods; supporting homeowners at risk of mortgage default to keep their homes; and targeting efforts to address long-term inequities in the housing market, including discrimination in venting. • Residents expressed an interest in expanding the availability of affordable, multi -family housing and support for lower income, rent burdened households:
o Residents would like to see new housing in areas with the least impact on traffic and that new housing should hespread evenly across all parts ofthe City. o Residents support tiny home development tohelp alleviate homelessness o Residents support exploring how rezoning might encourage more affordable developments
o Residents would like that the City ensure long-term affordability covenants on housing During the preparation of the housing element the City did a diligent effort to include public

through electronic means such as websitesand social media sites, the City proactively and broadly conducted through a variety of methods to assure access and participation. Outreach for the workshop was conducted inEnglish and Spanish using flyers, social media posts, direct mail tuastakeholder list and to an email list with over 2O,OOUcontacts from the [it's Park and Recreation Department. Press re leas es/n ot ificatio n of the workshop were sent to local media outlets and the Downey Chamber of Commerce members. Information was posted on the General Plan/Housing Element website. To ensure thatthehousinQconcernsuf|ow-andmoderate'inconneandspeda|needsmesiden1smereaddressed, the City notified agencies and organizations that serve these communities in Downey and surrounding areas. The list of agencies and organizations invited to the workshop are listed in Appendix A and included over 100 groups and agencies working with special needs groups, civic and religious groups and housing developers and local businesses. Making the outreach process and material accessible to Spanish speakers was a priority. Outreach for the workshops and the survey was conducted in English and Spanish. The community workshops had dedicated Spanish breakout rooms where the presentation and discussion were conducted inSpanish.

Tnaffirmatively further fair housing:
0 outreach plans should consider geographic barriers toporbc/potionondshnukdplantoho/din- participate.
o The Draft Housing Element was drafted during 2B2Oand 2O21and Covid'19pandemic public gathering limitations were still in place. As a result, the outreach meetings were conducted through teleconferencing.

Meetings should be held outside of work hours, including on evenings and weekends, to facilitate participation.
o Both public workshops were conducted in the evening. The survey was available from December 18, 2020 to January 29, 2021 which allowed for access during a variety of days and times.

Drafts ofthe housing element should bemade available Umthe public for review and comment with ample time before submission to the Department of Housing and Community Development (9CO)for review.
o The City released the Public Review Draft to gather input from the community for two weeks prior its submittal to HCD. The Draft continued to be made available to the public for input during the 60-day period that the Element was under review by HCD. The Public review draft was distributed to agencies and organizations that serve these communities in Downey and surrounding areas. The community was notified of the opportunity to comment on the Draft through posts on the City's dedicated Housing Element webpage and via social media. A revised HCD Revisions Draft was also made available to the public for seven days prior to resubmittal. Changes in statutory deadlines (AB 1379) necessitated that the City resubmit the revised Housing Element following aseven- day public review period.

In -person and electronic options for participation should also be mode available. o The Draft Housing Element was drafted during 2020 and 2021 and Covid-19 pandernic public gathering limitations were still in place. As a result, the outreach meetings were conducted through teleconferencing. Electronic options were provided tothe community to provide input on the Draft Housing Element and participation in the survey.

The City will continue to employ a wide variety of media and methods to notify the public of important housing decisions and opportunities to provide input. A new program is the Housing Plan details the actions the City will take toachieve this include:
•Expandingoutreachtonun'profitdeue|opers,areasemineprovdeo,andcommunity'baaed organizations.
• Partnering with local community -based organizations to hold community meetings to gain input from Downey residents about housing needs, issues, and ideas to support the development of more affordable housing inthe City.
• Recruiting residents from underserved neighborhoods to participate on committees to address homelessness and affordable housing needs.

The City considered and incorporated the major themes identified during the public outreach program not only on its approach to meeting its identified housing need (expanding housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community), but in including programs and actions that address housing needs of Downey residents most particular related to the cost and affordability of housing — which was the major theme that emerged. The City's rezoning program to address the 6 th cycle RHNA reflects a significant expansion in housing opportunities in non-residential areas of the City. The City's strategy addresses constraints todevelopment ufhousing byincreasing residential densities, making residential a by -right use along the indicated areas of the City's corridors, and by streamlining multi -family projects

This element includes use efmany acronyms toidentify agencies, housing programs, funding sources, and planning terms. The most used acronyms (and their definitions) are included below.

AFFH-Affimmatively Furthering Fair Housing
Refers to the 1968 Fair Housing Act's obligation for state and local governments to improve and achieve more meaningful outcomes from fair housing policies, so that every American has the right to fair housing, regardless oftheir race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, orfamilial status.

Al - Analysis mfImpediments
Areview ofimpediments orbarriers that affect the rights uffair housing choice. Itcovers public and private policies, practices, and procedures affecting housing choice. The Al serves as the basis for fair housing planning, provides essential information to po|icymakero, administrative staff, housing providers, lenders, and fair housing advocates, and assists in building public support for fair housing efforts.

The Area Median Income (AJN|)is themidpointofareQion'sincomedbthbukion—halfoffami|iesina region earn more than the median and half earn less than the median. Related tohousing policy, the U.S.Department ofHousing and Urban Development (HUD)and California Housing and Community Development Department both define and release income thresholds every year, by household size, that determines eligibility for affordable housing.

CDBG-Community Development Block Grant
A grant program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that provides federal grants directly to larger urban cities and counties for activities that benefit low- and modena1e'incomeindividum|s,eUminatebU0ht,oraddresneseriousandimnmediatethreat to public health and welfare. States distribute CDBG funds to smaller cities and towns. Grant amounts are determined byaformula based upon need.

CEQA-Califmrnia Environmental Quality Act
A state law requiring state and local agencies to assess the environmental impacts of public or private projects they undertake or permit. Agencies must mitigate adverse impacts of the project to the extent feasible. If a proposed activity has the potential for a significant adverse environmental impact, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared and certified as legally adequate by the public agency before acting onthe proposed project.

CHAS-Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
A plan prepared by state or local agencies as a prerequisite for receiving assistance under certain U.S.

Department ofHousing and Urban Development (HUD)programs.

HCD-Ca|ifomia Department ofHousing and Community Development A state agency that administers state housing programs. HCD also administers the federal HOME and

lwyrnj �E� TYP
government housing and urban development programs.

RHNA - Regional Housing Needs Assessment
A determination by a council of governments (COG) (or by the California Department of Housing and Community Development [HCD]) of the existing and projected need for housing within a region. The 2�:JIZ2W,--145,�-�rto�oLl-.f W,4-4,K-�9i
the region. This housing allocation must be reflected in the locality's housing element of the general plan.

SCAG - Southern California Association of Governments
SCAG is a Joint Powers Authority under California state law, established as an association of local law, SCAG is designated as a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and under state law as a Regional Transportation Planning Agency and a Council of Governments. The SCAG region encompass six counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) and 191 cities in a area covering more than 38,000 square miles. I

This page left intentionally blank.

NO '14,111

law (California Government Code Section 65583(a)(1) and 65583(a)(2)) requires that this Housing Element assess population demographics and economic characteristics. Characteristics such as age, Ah
demographic changes can also help City leaders better respond to or anticipate changing housing current housing stock meets the needs of current and future city residents. The identified demographic patterns and trends will serve as the basis for crafting the City's housing policies and programs. This chapter uses data from various sources and with differing methodologies and timeframes. Totals may vary between data sources, but the intent of including the data is to show Between 281Uand JOZQ asreported bythe U.5.Census, the population ofDowney grew approximately O.9percent, from 111,933to113,9O1residents. Compared with the County ofLos Angeles asawhole, the 0.9 percent increase is one-third. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) growth forecasts predict a steady increase in population through 2045. From 2020 to 2045, SCAG projects that the City's population will grow by 5.6 percent, while countywide population is expected to increase by1S.6percent. The projected growth largely istied tuanticipated increases inhousing production, which has not been a factor for the last decade, hence the small percentage increase in Downey.

Table 2.1: Population Growth and Projected Growth
Source: US Census Bureau 2010, 2018 ACS 5-year, SCAG Growth Forecast

5.6%

15.6%
�___�

In addition to population projections, several other demographic characteristics and trends define housing needs. Among these characteristics are age composition, racial and ethnic composition, and employment.

Age
Median Age

5.6 White (non -Hispanic)
American Indian and Alaska Native
162(0.2%)
127(0.1%)
Employment by Industry
Educational services, and health care and social assistance 11,704 (23.3%)
10,408 (183%)
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative 4,330 (8.6%)
5,987 (10.5%)
and waste management services
Construction
Arts, entertainment, and recreation, and accommodation and 3,511 (7.0%)
5,669 (10.0%)
food services
Finance and insurance, and real estate and rental and leasing 3,207 (6.4%)
3,340 (S.9%)
Other services, except public administration
1,916 (3.8%)
3,061 (5,40/j)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting, and mining__ 334(0.7%) 141
(U%)
Source: US Census Bureau 2010, 2018 ACS 5-year
Seniors may eventually choose to trade down from their larger homes that they once needed for 6ildren to smaller and more affordable homes.

26Jpercent. While they make upthe smallest group (11.5percent in2O18),compared with ZO1lthe 65 and older age group experienced the greatest relative change, with an increase of 13.6 percent. The median age in the City is 35.6 years. Compared with the County (36.2 years) and the State (36.3 years), the City's population is younger. The large proportion of working adults and school -age children and the small senior population means that demand will likely continue to grow for larger units for families.

Along with an aging population, Downey is becoming more diverse racially and ethnically. Figure2.1 shows the racial/ethnic distribution of the population in the City of Downey. Hispanic residents make up most of the City's population. Compared with the County of Los Angeles, the City has a higher percentage ofHispanic residents and alower percentage ofwhite, non -Hispanic residents. Since 201q the proportion ofall non -Hispanic race/ethnic groups have decreased. - White (non -
Hispanic),
Source: usCensus Bureau ao1oAcss-yooEstimates
Residents ioDowney are primarily employed ineducational services, health care and social assistance, manufacturing, and retail trade. Major employers in the City include Kaiser Permanente with 4,500 employees, Stonewood Center with 2,100 employees, Downey Unified School District with 1,851 employees, and Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center with 1,41Oemployees.

Employment characteristics are important asthey have adirect relationship with income. |nDowney, the industries inwhich most residents work vary astowhether they pay below urabove the median income. Workers in manufacturing earn a median income that is 17.5 percent greater than the median

However, the median income earned by retail trade employees is 27.7 percent lower than the medi income for Downey residents. 11
Household characteristics can impact the type of housing needed. (The U.S. Census has different definitions for "household" and for "family": a household is the total number of related and unrelatedii. 0 , r4AM41re6ir unit.) For instance, single -person households often occupy smaller apartments or condominiums, such as one -bedroom units. Couples often prefer larger homes, and particularly single-family homes if they have children. As the baby boom generation continues to age, there has been an increased demand from empty nesters and retirees to clownsize to more affordable units that are easier to maintain. Thel patterns underscore the need for housing opportunities for people of all ages and income. I Characteristics for Downey households are summarized in Table 2.3. As defined above, the term "household" refers to the occupants of a housing unit, rather than the housing stock itself. The number of households has decreased by 921 households (or 2.7 percent) since 2010. The tenure distribution is households that are renter occupied constitute 49.4 percent of all households. Different housing arrangements have different housing needs, and this distribution indicates that addressing issue and needs for renters and owners equally is important.

Number of Households
16,800 (50.6%)
16,387 (49.4%)
23,187
Median Household Income
$92,179
$54,770
$71,948
Household Income Categories
-
-
-
Extremely, Low Income (0-30% AMI)
1,235 (7.6%)
3,290 (19.8%)
4,525 (13.8%)
Very Low Income (30-50% AMI)
1,810 (11.2%)
3,240 (19.5%)
5,050 (15A%)
Low Income (50-80% AMI)
2,895 (17.9%)
4,320 (26.0%)
7,215 (22.0%)
Moderate Income (80-100% AMI)j
2,025 (12.5%)
2,545 (15.3%®)
4,570 (13,9%)
Above Moderate Income (100% + AM 1)
8,210 (50.7%)
3,220 (19.4%)
11,430 (34�9%)
Total number of projected Extremely Low-
N/A
N/A
I
1,039-
Income Households 18HNA)
All Households Overpaying for Housing 5,860 (36.2%) 8,480 (51.0%) 14,340 (43,7%) Lower Income Households Overpaying for 3,600 (60.6%) 7,870 (72.5%) 11,475 (68.3%) Housing
Note: Pursuant to AB 2534, local jurisdictions are also required to project the housing needs of extremely low-income households (0-30% AMI). In estimating the number of extremely low-income households, ajurisdiction can use 50% of the very low-income allocation or apportion the very low-income figure based on Census data. Therefore, the City's very low- income RHNA of 2,079 units can be split into 1,039 extremely low-income and 1,040 very low-income units.

Source: US Census Bureau 2018 5-year, U.S. HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 2012-2016, Regional Housing Needs Allocation 2021-2029

According tuU.SiCensus 2U185'yearestimates, the median household income for Downey was $71,948; compared with the County of Los Angeles median household income of $64,251, the median income inDowney was 1%percent higher. Median household income differs bytenure; while renter - occupied medionhouseho|dinconoeinZ028wms $54,77O,the owner -occupied median household income was almost twice that at $92,179.

Census data estimates that in Downey, 9.9 percent of residents live in poverty, as defined by federal guidelines. This proportion is lower than the County of Los Angeles, where 16 percent of residents live in poverty. The proportion of residents living in poverty varies by race/ethnicity, disability status, and household type. The proportion of persons or households in Downey living in poverty is much higher for Black residents, of which 21.2 percent live in poverty, and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander residents, of which 65.2 percent live in poverty. Additionally, 13.8 percent of residents with a disability and IGJpercent offemale-headed households live inpoverty.

For housing planning and funding purposes, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) uses five income categories to evaluate housing need based on the Area Median Income (AM|)for the County:
m Extremely Low-income Households earn O-}0%nfAK8\
m Very Low-income Households earn 3U'SO%ofAM\
* Low-income Households earn 5U'80%o[AM|
• Moderate -income Households earn gU'II096ofAM|(federal data uses 180%) • Above Moderate -income Households earn over 120% of AMI (federal data uses 100%+) Source: U.S. Housing and Urban Development CoMprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) 2012-201* Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy ([HAS) data provide special Census tabulations (developed for HUD) and calculate household income adjusted for family size and tenure. As shown in

Figure 2.2, in Downey, Above Moderate -income households represent the largest share of all households and Low-income households the second largest category. According V»the 2016[HA3 13.8 percent of all households were classified as Extremely Low Income (0-30 percent of AMI), 15.4 percent were classified as Very Low Income (31-50 percent of AMI), 22 percent were classified as Low Income (51'8OY6ApN|),and l3.9percent were classified asModerate Income (8O'1UOpercent AM|),Income differs bytenure. Tenure and income are closely tied ayTable 2.3above shows that more renter households are in the lower income categories (0-80 percent AMI) compared with owner households.

Extremely low-income (ELI) is defined as households with income less than 30 percent of area median income. An estimate of the number of ELI households is provided in in Table 2.3: Household Characteristics by Tenure. Using Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data Table 2.3 shows that 13.8 percent of the City's total households (4,525 households) were classified as extremely low income (0-30 percent of AMI). Households with extremely low-income have a variety of housing situations and needs. For example, most families and individuals receiving public assistance, such as social security insurance (SSI) or disability insurance are considered extremely low-income households.

To calculate the projected housing needs, the City assumed 50 percent of its very low-income regional housing need are extremely low-income households. As a result, from the very low-income need of 2,079 units, the City has a projected need of 1,039 units for extremely low-income households. Many exireme|y|ov+incomehousehm|dswiUbexeekingrenta|huusingandmust|ike|yfadnganoverpayment, overcrowding or substandard housing condition. Table 2.3 shows that while 43.7 percent of households overpay for housing in Downey, 68.3 percent of lower income households overpay for housing. The situation is more dire for extremely low-income households as HUD data shows that 83.9 percent of these households overpay for housing.

Some extremely low-income households could be with mental orother disabilities and special needs. To address the range of needs, the City will employ a detailed housing strategy including changing the City's land use policy to include Low -Barrier Navigation Centers as a by right use in areas zoned for mixed -use andnon'residentia|zonespermittin8mu|tifami|yuses,punuanttoAB1O1.State|awrequiresddesto allow transitional and supportive housing as a residential use and allowed by right in all zones that allow similar residential uses. The City will also expand housing opportunities to meet the needs of special needs residents —including seniors, residents with disabilities and developmental disabilities, large families, extremely low-income households, and those experiencing homelessness —by giving priority to development projects that include acomponent for special needs groups inaddition toother lower - income househu|ds.|ncentivesovai|ab|etnseniorhousingtoaUspecia|needshousingtypes,iodudin8 reduced parking standards and unit sizes, increased height allowances, and maximum lot coverage. The City will continue working toward providing additional regulatory incentives and concessions to projects targeted for special needs groups.

State and federal standards specify that households spending more than 30 percent of gross annual income onhousing experience ahousing cost burden. Housing cost burdens occur when housing costs increase faster than household income. When a household spends more than 30 percent of its income on housing costs, it has less disposable income for other necessities such as health care. In the event of unexpected circumstances such as loss of employment or health problems, lower -income households with a housing cost burden are more likely to become homeless or double up with other households. In

Downey, 43.7 percent of households are overpaying for housing. Overpayment varies by tenure and in•me. For owner-occur)ied households, 36.2 percent are overpavin red with more 7MIMAGIZ61 Ril line =I@ a
I a is 0 6 0 4
This section describes housing characteristics and trends to provide a basis for assessing the match 'tQUVQ&-X_tM tt-_-�2.fdi 2Af LiIIPV_J_Leseiftcktde h osinq_g• hh ousing I mw n- -- characteristics, age and condition of housing, housing prices and rents, and homeownership rates.

Z='•'
ELVA meqno is W a
with 37.5 percent being multi -family units. Single-family homes also represent most o Pte ou Wingstoc increase from 2010, with 90.7 percent of new units being single-family. Mobile homes make up just 1 percent of the housing stock. Census data indicate that 0.6 percent of owner units and 2.1 percent of rental units are vacant.

Single -Family Detached -
Single -Family Attached
Multi -Family Units
Mobile home, other units
Total units
Average or median Household
Size
Units Needing
ReDlacement/Rehabilitation*
13,439 t37.5%)
368 (LO%)
35,838 (100.0%)
9��Z
W
Owner Households Renter Households All Households
Total Housing units 16,800 (50.6%) 16,387 (49.4%) 35,838" (100.0%) Vacancy Rate 0.6% 2.1% 3.7%
Overcrowded Units 1,105 (6.6%) 2,795 (17.1%) 3,900 (11.8%) Housing Cost $620,000 median sales $1,376 median gross N/A price rent
Note: 2020 CA DOF E-5 Population and Housing Estimates did not include a breakdown of data by tenure. Total housing units is from the US Census Bureau 2018 5-year data.
* These units, for example, may be suffering from neglect and building that appears structurally unsound and maintenance is non-existent. This does not include homes or structures that need more traditional rehabilitation such as repairs to maintain a safe and healthy living environment.
"Housing units by tenure reflect only occupied units while the total housing units includes unoccupied units Source: 2020 CA DOF E-5 Population and Housing Estimates, US Census Bureau 2018 5-year, CoreLogic May 2020; City of Downey 2020.

In response to a mismatch between household income and housing costs in a community, some households may not be able to buy or rent housing that provides a reasonable level of privacy and space. According to both California and federal standards, a housing unit is considered overcrowded if it is occupied by more than one person per room (excluding kitchens, bathrooms, and halls). In Downey,

11.8 percent ufhousing units are overcrowded. Overcrowding is more prevalent in rental units (17.1 percent) than owner -occupied units (6.6percend.

The condition of housing stock can be an indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Based upon observations and experiences of the Code Enforcement Division, the City estimates that in 2020, fewer than 25 housing units were in severe need of replacement or substantial rehabilitation due to housing conditions. These units, for example, may be suffering from neglect and building that appears structurally unsound and maintenance is non-existent. This does not include homes or structures that need more traditional rehabilitation such as repairs to maintain a safe and healthy living environment.

The City's Housing Rehabilitation and Assistance program provide grant assistance of up to $35,000 to very low-income households to address code enforcement violations and health and safety concerns, and to complete exterior painting. Grants can also be used to complete exterior and interior home repairs and make architectural modifications to achieve ADA compliance or reasonable accommodation for residents with disabilities. The program also provides refunds of 50 or 80 percent to low-income homeowners who have completed property, structural, and energy and/or water conservation improvements. Disabled households with needed accessibility modifications to their homes can also be assisted by the program. The City's code enforcement program refers property owners with compliance needs tohousing staff for rehabilitation assistance.

The cost of housing in a community is directly correlated to the number of housing problems and affordability issues. High housing costs can price low-income families out ofthe market, cause extreme cost burdens, or force households into overcrowded or substandard conditions. The Downey median home price in 2020, based information provided byCureLogic,was $62O,DD8.This was Q.5 percent higher than the median price in I019. The median home price in Los Angeles County as a whole in 2020 was $630,080, the same as in Downey. Home prices in Downey differ by geography; in the 90240 and AO24lZIP codes, the median home prices were $7O8,0OOand $698,000, respectively, while the median home price was $5yS,UOOinthe 9O242 ZIP code.

According Uothe ZU2U Census, 49.4 percent ofDowney households |ke in rental housing. Recent census data show that the median rent inDowney among all apartment units in2Ul9was S1,4GJper month.

Medianrentforaone'bedroomunitmos$1,l85permonth,and$],58Aforatwo'bednoomapartment.

Data from real estate website Zumper shows a much higher rental cost. As of March 2021, the average rent for a one -bedroom apartment was $1,510, and the average rent for a two -bedroom apartment was $1'985.

Table 2.5 shows that the HUD -determined fair market rents for Los Angeles County fall within the range ofthe rents within Downey. Therefore, the rental rates inDowney generally align with the HUD -defined fair market rents.

FY 2020 FIVIR $2,857
Source: FY2020 Fair Market Rents. U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) specific special needs groups and to address resources available to address these needs. Special needs households include people with disabilities, seniors, large families, single -parent households, --riencin
—riencin- homelessness. Table 2.6 summarizes soecial needs ngQuIation in Downey and is followed by a more detailed discussion of each.

Persons with Disabilities
Persons with Developmental Disabilities
Elderly (65+ years)
Large Households (5+ mern
Farmworkers
Female Headed Households
People Experiencing Homelessness
138 persons
12,967 persons
6,413 households
6,260 households
234 persons
Off-TIPWIT-11IMMM
258 persons

8.5% of residents

1.0% of residents

11.5% of residents

19.3% of households

18.9% of households

0.4% of labor force

20.6% of households

0.5% of Los Angeles
ountv Homeless Count
Source: US Census Bureau 2018 5-year, 2020 Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count, CA Department of Developmental Services Disabled residents face housing access and safety challenges. Disabled people, in most cases, are of "te,"c,wwx--?A1 * , income is
iften devoted to housing costs. In addition, disabled persons may face difficulty finding accessible housing (housing that is made • to •`•• with disabilities through the positioning •

2.ppliances and fixtures, the heights • installations and cabinets, layout of unit to facilitate wheelchair movement, etc.) because of the limited • • such units.
walking • • stairs) and independent living difficulties (difficulty •i errands alone such as g �r iff • F�" rLmC lik-,2 r, W%" `• 2 _W_ -YAl"s •
difficulty and 21 percent indicated an independent living difficulty. These disability types indicate the need for '.• housing and housing in a group setting with supportive services. The remaining disabilities tallied include cognitive difficulties (18 percent), self -care • (14 percent), hearing difficulties (12 percent), and vision difficulties (11 percent).

As age increases, so does the percentage • each age group that has disability; for residents who are 75 years and over, more than half (55.3 percent) have a disability, which is 28.2 percent of the total number

of residents with a disability. The 65 to 74 years age group constitutes the second -highest number of disabilities, with 1,855, although this is only 24 percent of the age group (19.3 percent of all people with disabi|hies).Disability and poverty are closely tied due toemployment limitations. For residents with disabilities, 13.8 percent live in poverty, compared to the 9.6 percent of residents without a disability who live in poverty.

The State Department of Developmental Services (DDS) currently provides community -based services to persons with developmental disabilities and their families through a statewide system of 21 regional centers. The Eastern Los Angeles Regional Center serves residents in Downey. The center is a private, non-profit community agency that contracts with local service providers to offer a wide range of services to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. In Downey, 1,138 persons are reported as consumers of the services provided at the local Regional Center. The largest age group of consumers are those ages 0 to 17, comprising 54.2 percent of the total consumers, followed by those ages 18 and older at45.8percent ofthe total consumers.
issues related to affordability and design significantly limit the supply of housing available to households ofpersons with disabilities. The most obvious housing need for persons with disabilities ishousing that is adapted to their needs. Location of housing is also an important factor for many persons with disabilities, as they often rely upon public transportation to travel to necessary services and shops. "Barrier free" housing, accessibility modifications, proximity to services and transit, and group living opportunities are important in serving this group. The City works with applicants who need special accommodations in their homes to ensure that application of building code requirements does not create a constraint. Cities and counties are required to consider requests for accommodations related to housing for people with disabilities and provide the accommodation when it is determined to be "reasonable" based on fair housing laws and case |avv interpreting the statutes. The City is in the process of creating a reasonable accommodation ordinance, to be completed in early 2022. The City complies with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the most recent California Building Code regulations. In addition, the City administers the Housing Rebate and Grant Program that provides financial assistance to disabled households to perform modifications such as those described above.

Many senior -headed households have special needs due to their relatively low incomes, disabilities or limitations, and dependency needs. Specifically, many people aged 65 years and older live alone and may have difficulty maintaining their homes, are usually retired and living on a limited income, and are more likely to have high health care costs and rely on public transportation, especially those with disabilities. The limited income of many elderly persons often makes it difficult for them to find affordable housing.

In Downey, 12,967 residents are 65 years and older, representing 11.5 percent of the population. The City has 6,413 senior households, of which 26.3 percent were renters and 73.7 percent were homeowners. For residents 65 years and older, 9.4 percent live in poverty, which is slightly lower than the 9.9 percent poverty rate for the County as a whole.

The City has worked with developers in the past to provide affordable rental housing specifically for seniors. In 1999 a 31,unitxeninr housing complex, Heritage Courts Senior Apartments was developed that is 100 percent affordable and limited to residents 65 or older. Within the complex there are 12 one-

bedroom units and 19 two -bedroom units. The City will continue to work with developers to provide affordable housing opportunities for senior residents and will continue to offer funding for home modifications through the Housing Rebate and Grant Program. The Barbara J. Riley Community and Senior Center offers programs and services for residents ages 50 and up. The Congregate Meal Program at the Senior Center is administered by Human Services Association of Bell Gardens. The Senior Center also provides avariety ofresources and referrals and has a Senior Wellness Check Program. The [ity's Parks and Recreation staff conducts daily phone call wellness checks with Downey seniors that are registered in its Senior Congregate Meal Program. These checks provide a safe and convenient way to check on the wellbeing of senior residents. The checks also serve as a social opportunity for seniors and help promote mental wellbeing as well. In addition to the daily phone call checks, City staff will conduct an on -site visit check if a senior cannot be reached over a 12-hour period. Staff will also contact the Downey Police Department if they cannot contact a senior either by phone or in -person.

Large households, defined by HCD as households containing five or more persons, have special housing needs due to the limited availability of adequately sized, affordable housing units. Larger units can be very expensive; as such, large households are often forced to reside in smaller, less expensive units or double -up with other families or extended family to save on housing costs, both of which may result in unit overcrowding. In Downey, 6,260 households are considered large households, or 18.9 percent of all households. There are 3,765 owner -occupied large households, or 60.1 percent of all large households, and 2,495 renter -occupied households, or 39.9 percent of all large households.

The 2O1AACS estimated that 16,906 housing units in Downey have three or more bedrooms. Of these units, 80 percent (13,578) were owner units and 20 percent (3,328) were rente r-occu pied. Four- or more bedroom units represented only 13 percent of all occupied housing units in the City. While it appears that there are enough units to accommodate the number of large households, it is likely that some of these large units are not occupied by large households. 2018 ACS data shows that the median household income in Downey was $71,948 and although five-, six, and seven -persons households had incomes above this ($lU2,417,$74371,and $9U,114respective|y),due tohousehold size they may still struggle with housing affordability. In 2019 seven percent of large families (household data not available) were living inpoverty, the same proportion for all families living inDowney.

A farmworker or agricultural worker is someone employed for labor in agriculture. Due to the high cost ofhousing and low wages, asignificant number ofmigrant farm workers have difficulty finding affordable, safe, and sanitary housing. In Downey, where there are no agricultural uses, only 234 residents, or 0.4 percent of the workforce are farmworkers. Los Angeles County has seen a significant decrease in agricultural workers. State EDD data (CA Employment Development Department, Industry Emp|oyment@LaborForcedatafortheLosAnge|e*Long8each'G|enda|e,K8aroh2OZU)shuwathat between 2000 and 2020, the number of farmworkers countywide decreased by 43 percent, from 7,700 to 4,400 farmworkers. Agricultural practices no longer account for a significant sector of Los Angeles County's economy, and as more agricultural land is converted for nonagricultural uses, this sector will continue todecline. Maps from the State of California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program show nofarmland in the City asDowney and most ofthe Los Angeles basin, is dassi0edas"UrbanandBui|t'UpLand".Quetnthe|ovvnumberofagricu|tura|wurkersinthe[ityand with farming activities not being located near Downey, there is a lower need for farmworker housing in

the City and the housing needs of migrant and/or farm worker housing need can be met through general affordable housing programs.

Single -parent households require special consideration and assistance because of the greater need for day care, health care, and other services. In 2018, Downey had 6,832 (20.6 percent) female headed households; most female -headed households are renters (61.2 percent). Currently, there are 4,336 single parent headed households. Female -headed households with children tend to have lower incomes and a greater need for affordable housing and accessible daycare and other supportive services. The relatively low incomes earned by female -headed households, combined with the increased need for supportive services, severely limit the housing options available to them. Of the 4,336 single parent headed households, in Downey, most (3,043) are female -headed households with children under 18 years of age (representing 45 percent of all female -headed households and 9 percent of all households in Downey). The City's 2014 Housing Element indicated that in 2010 (based on 2006-2010 ACS data) there were 6,418 female -headed households in the City of Downey, of which 3,286 had children under the age of 18. Compared with 2010 data, there has been an increase of six percent in the proportion of female -headed households in the City. Female -headed households with children tend to have lower incomes and a greater need for affordable housing and accessible daycare and other supportive services which severely limit the housing options available to them. A larger proportion of female -headed households live in poverty (16.7 percent) compared with all City households (9.9 percent). Lower - income single -parent households can benefit from County programs that provide direct rental assistance and ingeneral, programs that will facilitate the development ofaffordable housing.

People Experiencing Homelessness
Population estimates for people experiencing homelessness areverydifficulttomake.Cenous information is often unreliable due to the difficulty of efficiently counting a population without permanent residences. Given this impediment, local estimates of the homeless and anecdotal information are often where population numbers of the homeless come from. |n2O2O,the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count identified 258 persons experiencing homelessness in Downey, orQ.5 percent ofthe total number ofhomeless individuals in Los Angeles County. Of the 258 homeless individuals, 27 were sheltered and 231 unsheltered.

In Downey, homeless resources include the TLC Family Resource Center, which provides, food,clothing, health services, and other homeless support, and Angel Step Inn, anemergency shelter for victims of domestic violence. The Restorative Care Village at Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center is under construction and will include 22,OOOsquare feet and include l5Oskilled nursing beds, 8O residential treatments beds, and 50 beds in a Recuperative Care Center (RCC) will offer interim housing andindudeoon'siteadministrotivestaffsupporthealthoversi0ht,caxemanagementandUnka0eto permanent supportive housing. Also onthe Rancho Los Amigos site and currently under development is 1hel0U'bedVe{ermnCommonsmixed'usedeve|opment,whiohm/iUcombinesupportiveandaMbrdob|e housing for chronically homeless veterans and veteran families by providing a Workforce Development Hub to serve both the residents and the community at -large with job search assistance, employment training, and skill building services. In 2018, the City adopted a Plan to Prevent and Combat Homelessness, which outline the Oty/spriorities asit continues toaddress issues related to homelessness. The City's goals for addressing homelessness are as follows:

m Goal 1: Ensure City staff are equipped to address the intersection of homelessness and their departments through training onproper engagement techniques and available services. • Goal 2: Encourage the accessibility of supportive and affordable housing in the City. w Goal 3: Engage Downey residents and businesses around homelessness, services, and housing, • Goal 4:Increase the amount ufhomeless services offered inthe region. w Goal 5: Mobilize faith communities towards activities aligned with long-term solutions to Homelessness.
* Goa 6:Sustained commitment toending homelessness from the Downey City Council. • Goal 7: Prevent Downey residents from becoming homeless.

Other homeless shelters in the area include the Salvation Army Bell Shelter in the City of Bell and At the Fountain Transitional Living in the City of Bellflower.

Energy -related housing costs can directly impact the affordability of housing. While State building code standards contain mandatory energy efficiency requirements for new development, the City and utility providers are also important resources to encourage and facilitate energy conservation and to help residents minimize energy -related expenses. Policies addressing climate change and energy conservation are integrated into the Downey General Plan. Primary avenues to address climate change include lowering of transportation emissions through increased bicycle and pedestrian travel, improved land use decisions that places complementary uses in proximity to each other, reducing energy -related emissions by decreasing energy consumption of City operations, reducing water consumption, and incentivizing the use nfrenewable energy for citizens.

The Housing Rehabilitation Program assists Downey low- Uomoderate- income property owners with grants for necessary home repairs that include updates for energy and water conservation. Southern California Edison offers various energy conservation programs. The Energy Savings Assistance Prn8ram he|psimcome'qua|i8edcustnmersvvithfreeapp|iannesandinstaUatiunufenergy'effiden1refrigeratoo, air conditioners and more, as well as home efficiency solutions like weatherization. The Home Energy Efficiency Rebate Program offers financial incentives for installing approved energy upgrades. The Multifamily Energy Efficiency Rebate Program offers property owners and managers incentives on a broad list of energy efficiency improvements in lighting, HVAC, insulation, and window categories. These improvements are to be used to retrofit existing multifamily properties of two or more units.

Additionally, the Southern California Gas Company offers various rebate programs for energy -efficient appliances and makes energy efficient kits available to residents atnocost. The Southern California Gas Company also offers no -cost weatherization and furnace repair or replacement services for qualified |imited'incomecustomers.

State housing law requires an inventory and analysis of govern ment-assisted dwelling units eligible for conversion from lower income housing to market rate housing during the next ten years (2021-2031).

Reasons for this conversion may include expiration of subsidies, mortgage pre -payments or pay-offs, and concurrent expiration of affordability restrictions. Based on City records and information from the California Housing Partnership Corporation and the SCAG Pre -Certified Local Housing Data (2020), in the next 10 years there are no assisted housing developments in Downey at risk of losing affordability. Table

tarliest conversion dates. The earliest conversion date among these units is 2039. the btate mainta ns a is o n steo I
Consistent with Government Code Section _56b
Participating in California's First Right of Refusal Program" at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy- research/docs/HPD-00-OI.xlsx. This list includes various entities working in Los Angeles County and several entities interested in properties located in any county. If a development becomes at risk of providers who may have an interest in acquiring at -risk units and will assist other organizations in applying for funding to acquire at -risk units.

TCAC, H U D Sec.

Downey: The
Rental
Family
50 49
236 Program, Tax
2068
View
Exempt Bonds
Heritage Court
Rental
Senior
31 29
HOME (City of
2039
_!Apartments_
Downey)
Birchcrest
Rental
Family
64 62
HUD Sec. 236
2055
Apartments
11 units
Clark Manor
Rental
Family
41 41
HOME
restricted,
ADCO
Rental
Family
8 8
HOME
2059
Apartments
Townhome,
Elm Vista Owner Family 6 6 HOME 2062
Occupied
Total 200 195
Source: California Housing Partnership (CHPC), 2020; City of Downey, 2020; SCAG Pre -Certified Local Housing Data, 2020 Housing -element law requires a quantification of each jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need ?.s established in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) plan prepared by the jurisdiction's council of governments. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), in conjunction with the SCAG, determine a projected housing need for the region covered by SCAG, including the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura and Imperial. This share, the RHNA, is 1,341,827 new housing units for the 2021-2029 planning period throughout the each its own RHNA divided along income levels. The City of Downey has a RHNA of 6,525 housing units io accommodate in the housing element period. The income distribution is as shown in Table 2.8.

III iiiiii!��IIR lillillivil I 1,77= ��illillill III
0-50%
>50-80%
>80-120%
120%+

This page left intentionally blank,

availability of housing and the provision of affordable housing. Some of the key factors constraining standards and fees, and environmental factors like flooding or proximity to pollution sources, all of which can impact the cost and amount of housing produced. non -govern mental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing for all the local jurisdiction to remove governmental constraints that hinder achievement of its housing The availability and cost of housing is strongly influenced by market factors over which local government has little or no control. The primary non -governmental constraints to the development of new housing are land and financing availability, construction costs, and environmental constraints. State law requires that the housing element generally assess these constraints, which can inform actions that local governments might take tooffset the effects.

Land Availability and Cost
The price ofland and cost ofholding land throughout the development process are key components of the total cost of housing. These costs can account for as much as half of the final sales prices of new homes in small developments or in areas where land is scarce. The very limited amount of vacant residential land available inDowney creates osignificant constraint tnthe development ofnew housing.

Land costs in Downey's single-family residential neighborhoods range from $850,000 to $1.65 million for appruximate|yO.5'acne properties.' The diminishing supply nfland available for residential construction, combined with increasing demand for such development, has served to keep the cost of land high and I A review of available properties posted on Zillow and comparable sites in August 2020 show only two available vacant sites for sale. Land costs are estimated from this sample. See Downey CA Land, ZiUow,Accessed August Land for Sale, Landwatch'Accessed August 202[\

rising across Southern California. |naddition 0odemand, other variables affecting the cost ofland are the size oflots, location and amenities, the availability and proximity of public services, and the financing arrangement between the buyer and seller.

The time needed to hold land for development can also increase the overall cost of a project due to the interest which accrues on acquisition and development loans, the preparation of the site for construction, and government processing times for applications for entitlements and permits.

Underdevelopment ofproperties, particularly onthose zoned asR-3multifamily, adds anadditional constraint to the development of new housing. Even with an allowable 24 units per acre as permitted by the Downey Municipal Code, removing existing uses and redeveloping a property can be difficult. The market value of land and the costs of new construction may limit what a property owner may earn from developing a property at higher densities. Chapter 4, Housing Resources, includes an analysis and discussion of vacant and underutilized residentially zoned parcels that can accommodate new housing.

Construction Costs
Construction cost is determined primarily by the cost of labor and materials. These are the most significant cost components of developing residential units, and they have grown dramatically in recent years. According to data from the California Construction Cost Index, hard construction costs in California grew by 44 percent between 2014 and 2018, or an additional $80 per square foot.2 Construction costs are estimated to account for upwards of 60 percent of the production costofanew home, especially for multi -unit residential buildings which often require the use of more expensive materials, like steel, and need additional amenities such as parking structures.3 Variations in the quality of materials, type of amenities, labor costs, and the quality of building materials could result in higher or lower construction costs for anew home. Prefabricated factory -built housing, with variation onthe quality of materials and amenities, may also affect the final construction costper square foot ofa housing project.

The price paid for material and labor atany one time will reflect short-term considerations ofsupply and demand. Future costs are difficult to predict given the cyclical fluctuations in demand and supply that in large part are created by fluctuations in the state and national economies. Such policies unilaterally impact construction in a region and therefore do not deter housing construction in any specific community. An indicator ofconstruction costs is Building Valuation Data compiled by the International Code Council (|[[). The unit costs compiled bythe |[[ include structural, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical work, in addition to interior finish and normal site preparation. The data are national and do not consider regional differences, nor do the data include the price of the land upon which the buildings are built. The 2020 national averages for costs per square foot of apartment units and single-family homes are oofollows:
• Type |nr||,K0ulti-Family: $1Z9.Z3to$I67.Z7per square foot • Type V(Wood Fn*me),Muhi'Famik/: $11Z76to$I475Oper square foot • Type V(Wood Frame),One- and Two -Family Dwelling: $1ZZ46to$l4l7Zper square 2 Hayley Raetz, Teddy Forscher, Elizabeth Kneebone and Carolina Reid, The Hard Costs of Construction: Recent Trends in Labor and Materials Costs for Apartment Buildings in California, The Terner Center for Housing Innovation, University ofCalifornia Berkeley, March IOZC\p.8'

Availability of Financing
ca-cit.?l iised bX cleveloopir- fnr i-titiA itp wrenarm&wt a-ccl co-istructio'l, j,lg il iiiii9l for financing, t e 4F
purchase, and improvement costs. A fluctuation in rates of just a few percentage points can make a dramatic difference in the annual income needed to qualify for a loan.

In general, since the mid-2010s, financing for new residential development has been available at reasonable rates. However, economic fluctuations due to COVID-19 beginning in March of 2020 cause �J MitillA 2AAi�xg lex1erS 2A1 Xk2y k2ve 1,2stixg effects tkr#ugkz*is W*usixg Elenext -,1,1211ilg period. Al past, leading to credit tightening despite affordable interest r t es. ia I
7 c odI S of
t mmunity, lening prd e actices, the rates an•fees chargd, laws and regulations governin finan g cial institutions, and whether there is equal o ooo access t•thse institutins. The City f Downey's analysis of I
v
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HDMA) data on the disposition of residential loan a pplications in the City provides a snapshot of the availability of financing to Downey residents as of 2021.

In 2017, 3,445 households in Downey filed housing to applications. Table 3.1 below shows the rate of approvals among home loan applications where a decision was rendered by a lending institution.

Approval rates were lowest for home improvement loans (71.31 percent), or nearly 12 percentage e ?nnroval rate for all loan aDolications in Downev in 2017 (83.12 oercent).

Home improvement approval rates were also found to be lower during an assessment in the last qualify for a traditional home improvement loan for rehabilitation and repair work.

Table-3.1: Home Loan Application Activity in Downey, 2017 mom,
Home Purchase 925 33.44% 847 91.57%
Home Improvement 244 8.82% 174 71.31°/®
Refinancing 1,597 57.74% 1,278 80.03%
Total 2,766 100.00% 2,299 83.12%
Source: City of Downey; 2017 Financial Institutions Examination Council — 2017 HIVIDA Database 1 Total does not include applications which were withdrawn or closed prior to a decision. percent of all loans were approved. Low-income households experienced an overall loan approval rate in 2017 of 78.3 percent, and middle -income households had an overall loan approval rate of 76.5 were geferallv hi hest for IAI , p ni
hit nn hcants and lowest for Black aDDlicants.

Government Code section 65583(a)(6) requires an analysis of requests to develop housing at densities below those anticipated in sites inventory and the length of time between receiving approval for housing development and submittal of an application for building permit. The analysis must also look at local efforts to remove nongovernmental constraints that create a gap in the jurisdiction's ability to meet RHNAbyincome category.

Reques1sfovLovver DevelopmentDeOsitks
The City of Downey works with developers to help move housing projects forward and does not discourage a developer who may pursue a lower density than the maximum allowed. The City has seen a pattern of developments proposing lower densities among developers who work in the local area and the same formula and site plan for most standard sized lots. Similar site and floor plans are utilized throughout the City with different architectural styles at each site. This pattern allows developers to save cost because they can work from a base template instead of starting from scratch on every project.

When a project is proposed at densities lower than what is indicated in the Housing Element, the City encourages the applicant to use the density bonus provisions to incorporate affordable housing and to achieve a higher number of units. With recent legislation and the larger RHNA for the 6 th planning period, City staff has initiated conversations with applicants to encourage use of density bonuses and concessions available for affordable housing projects that can reduce some development standards.

What the City is finding is that although density bonuses and concessions are appealing, most developers who commonly work in the City are hesitant to be the first; they want to see other developments that have utilized the incentives before they try an affordable product. To show prospective developers the potential advantages of using the state's density bonus provisions, a detailed list of completed density bonus projects in Downey and in neighboring cities and a list of available concessions will be compiled and shared with all new applicants inquiring about or submitting plans for multi -family developments (Program 1.5). As part ofhousing element implementation, the City will be establishing minimum densities for development of multifamily uses along commercial corridors and at underdeveloped commercial centers. The minimum densities will ensure that new developments in this area are consistent with the density assumptions inthis Housing Element.

Building Permit Timeframe
in Downey, the length of time between receiving approval for housing development and submittal of an app|icadonforabui|dingpermitis1ypica|k/6Odoyoor|eysfursing|e4amilydeve|opment4andsixto nine months for larger developments, depending on project complexity. For example, a multi -family residential project with complex grading and drainage plans may take longer to obtain permits. Also, developers may struggle with feasibility analyses, financing, or negotiations with design professionals, factors which are beyond the City's control.

Local Efforts to Remove Non -Governmental Constraints
This development analysis must also look at local efforts to remove non'Qovernmenta| constraints that create a gap in the jurisdiction's ability to meet RHNA by income category. In most parts of California, the primary non -governmental constraint is the overall cost of affordable housing development (high land and development costs). In general, constructing affordable housing, especially for low- and very low-income households, is not profitable to housing developers. Therefore, deed -restricted affordable units require subsidy beyond available density or financial incentives. This places the construction burden on non -profits and similar grant -funded housing developers and may result in affordable

projects that are not always dispersed throughout the region but are concentrated in limited areas with lower development costs.

While the City can offer developer incentives such as expedited permit processingorfeedefenab`k cannot afford tofully mitigate the high cost ofdevelopment for affordable housing developments and does not have programs to assist in financing private projects. Downey has offered to cover the cost of installation of utility connections for new, large housing developments. However, the City's ability to provide such assistance is limited. The City will continue to facilitate housing development through program actions related to providing development assistance —including continued streamlining and processing efficiencies such as creating an option for electronic plan check. As part of the State's Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB2, 2017) the City was awarded a grant to implement an online permitting and licensing program. The upgrades will expedite permit processing and reduce unnecessary delays.

Although local governments have little influence on such market factors as interestrates and availability of funding for development, their policies and regulations can affect both the amount of residential development that occurs and the affordability ofhousing. Since governmental actions can constrain development and affordability of housing —largely due to zoning regulations, fees, and delays in permit processes —State law requires the Housing Element to "address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing."
Governmental constraints are policies, development regulations, standards, requirements, orother actions imposed by various levels of government upon land and housing ownership and development.

Land use controls, building codes, processing procedures, and development fees are all factors that may hamper the maintenance, improvement, and/or development of housing in Downey. State and federal regulations such as those related to environmental protection, building codes, and other topics have significant and often adverse impacts onhousing costs and availability, although they are important to ensure provision ofm/eU'cons1ructed,safe units. While constraints exist atall levels ofgovernment, this section emphasizes policies and regulations that can be mitigated by the City of Downey.

Housing supply and cost are greatly affected by the amount of land designated for residential use and the densities at which development is permitted. In Downey, more than half of the City is designated for residential uses. Single-family residential neighborhoods are hyfar the most common residential use, accounting for more than half ofall land area.

The Land Use Element ofthe City ofDowney's Vision 202SGeneral Plan sets forth policies for guiding local development. These policies, together with existing zoning regulations, establish the amount and distribution of land to be allocated for different uses within the City. Table 3,2summarizes the General Plan land use designations and zoning districts that allow residential development either by right or through discretionary review processes.

Table 3.2: Residential General Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning Districts
Low/Medium Density
Residential
Medium Density
Residential
—1to8.9units per acre,
based onlot si z e'
9 tol7 units per acre
18 to 24 units per acre
R-1, Single Family Residential
R-2,Two Family Residential
-3, Medium Density Multiple -Family
Residential; R-3-0,Multiple-Family
Mixed Use Maximum of 24 units per M-U, Mixed Use
acre
Source: City of Downey, Vision 2025 General Plan, 2005
The Downey Vision 2025 General Plan Final EIR (2005) estimates a total residential "build out" of 36,9 units on all vacant and developed residential land, which was 2,156 units above the City's existing housing stock at the time. Most residential land in Downey is already developed, but some parcels are underutilized, meaning the developed densities are below the maximums allowed by the Zoning Code Most new housing units are likely to come from these underutilized residential properties as they are redeveloped with higher density developments. The increasing ease with which Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) can be constructed due to changes in State law will affect residential yield, particularly given the substantial land area in Downey occupied by single-family homes. I Aside from the three residential zones in the City that accommodate residential development (R-1, R-2, and R-3 zones), the City has also identified opportunities in which commercial properties can be "recycled" for residential purposes. In 2010, the Downey City Council adopted the Downtown Downey Specific Plan, identifying it as a "residential development opportunity area" for the development of mixed -use, multi -family housing. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan was initiated by the City to guide growth and residential development in the downtown area, encourage economic revitalization, and create a vibrant center of activity for the City. The Specific Plan includes objectives to focus growth in Downtown by allowing and promoting higher density residential and mixed -use development and to develop residential uses for all income levels. It establishes 131 acres as five unique land use districts, right and Qermit residential development
at the following densities:

1. Downtown Core —20 to 40 dwelling units per acre

2. Downtown Residential —8 to 40 dwelling units per acre

3. Firestone Boulevard Gateway — 40 to 75 dwelling units per acre

4. Paramount Boulevard Professional— 20 to 40 dwelling units per acre

7 1 �M'
1",
Minimum Lot Size
2,500 SF
1! 5,000 SF 20,000 SF
10,000 SF
80%-100%
80%
Commercial
Commercial
Maximum Lot Coverage
and Mixed-
Lot Coverage
and Mixed -
Use/
varies 100%
Use/
60% if
60% if
Residential
Residential
Only
Only
Maximum Floor Area Ratio

1.5 FAR

1.5 FAR 3.0 FAR

2.0 FAR
(FAR)
Maximum Height Limit
3 stories/ 45 ft
4 stories/50 ft 6 stories/75 ft
4 stories/50 ft
(See Section 3.6.2, Exhibit 3.2)
Minimum/Maximum Density
20-40 du/ac
8-40 du/ac 40-75 du/ac
20-40 du/ac
One bedroom - 600 square feet Two bedroom — 750 square feet Minimum Unit Sizes
Three bedroom — 1,000 square feet
Parking
0 Single
Family Units: Per City Standards
0 Multifamily Residential
o
Ownership: 1.7 spaces per dwelling
unit
o
Rental: 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit
o
Guests utilize off -site (public) parking
Source: Downtown Downey Specific Plan, adopted September 2010.
sit I HiFrOR-3 MWIIIIIIINI-TIFEWIM 0 11 0 W imLyr-AIJ6101504- Me passed numerous changes to the density bonus requirements. Chapter 6: Housing Plan includes State laws.

MAI
Duplex Dwelling
MEN,
Housing for Agricultural
~
Mobile/Manufactured Home CUP CUP CUP
Emergency Shelter, 1530
residents
Emergency Shelter, >30
residents
Single Room Occupancy CUP
Residential care, > 6 clients CUP CUP CUP
Senior Housing Development A
Source: City of Downey Municipal Code, 2020
Site Review for R-3 and R-3-0
0 A
CUP

CUP CUP
A CUP
Subject to Section 9418
Residential Development Standards
The City's current residential development standards are typical for those cities immediately surrounding Downey, many of which developed and matured along the same timeline. Permitted i La
are in concert with those being used by surrounding jurisdictions and to a great extent throughout the suburbs of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
two stories. Multi -family building heights are limited to 35 feet or three stories, whichever is less. The Zoning Code offers a height and/or density bonus for projects with affordable units. The application of these incentives, particularly in multiple -family residential zone districts (R-2 and R-3 zones), has resulted in the redevelopment of parcels that were previously underdeveloped with new, larger residential projects. Typical redevelopment includes demolition of current structures and the construction of new units to the allowed maximum density (24 du/acre), usually consisting of multi- family dwellings with units located over ground -floor garages.

The 35'fxotheight limit for multi -family projects inthe R'3zone isnot aconstraint for development. The minimum building code story height of seven feet allows for a comfortable development of three stories, which can accommodate the subfloors depths and roof pitch. The typical building type seen in the City of Downey is a townhouse design with a ground floor garage, usually incorporating a lower ceiling height, and two habitable floors above with ceiling heights of at least 9 feet. The 35-foot building height could easily accommodate an apartment or condominium development with three floors of habitable space. Higher building heights are available for projects within the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (DDSP) areas (45 to 75 feet) and several projects have been built at the established heights. The Downey View project is a 50 unit, six -story, 74-foot-tall building located within DIDSP District 5. Heritage Cnurtisa3l'unit,four-story,38-foot-taUbui|din0|ocatedvxbhinDDSPDistrictJ.Aspartofthe[it/s Housing Element implementation (Program 1.3), the City is increasing allowable density in the R-3 zone toallow upto4Ounits per acre and inthe process ufadjusting development standards, accordingly, Subject to Section 9418
Residential Development Standards
The City's current residential development standards are typical for those cities immediately surrounding Downey, many of which developed and matured along the same timeline. Permitted i La
are in concert with those being used by surrounding jurisdictions and to a great extent throughout the suburbs of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
two stories. Multi -family building heights are limited to 35 feet or three stories, whichever is less. The Zoning Code offers a height and/or density bonus for projects with affordable units. The application of these incentives, particularly in multiple -family residential zone districts (R-2 and R-3 zones), has resulted in the redevelopment of parcels that were previously underdeveloped with new, larger residential projects. Typical redevelopment includes demolition of current structures and the construction of new units to the allowed maximum density (24 du/acre), usually consisting of multi- family dwellings with units located over ground -floor garages.

including building heights. Program l3aboindudesonactionhemtoreviewandrevberesidentia| developments standards including building height limits in the R'3 zoning district.

The City completed acomprehensive update tothe residential development standards inMay of2O21.

The adopted residential development standards place slightly greater restrictions on the permitted sizes of houses in R'1 zone districts, including more restrictive setback requirements. These standards aim to limit the size of single-family homes and discourage over -sized homes considered incompatible with homes in existing single-family neighborhoods ("anti-mansionization"). For properties in the R-3 zoning district, the development standards are unchanged (setback, height, and parking requirements). Curreni residential development standards for multi -family are similar to those of surrounding jurisdictions and do not appear to constrain development, as evidenced by prior projects that involved private redevelopment activity. The regulations also provide incentives and concessions, including higher building heights, for density bonuses to facilitate construction of affordable units. To encourage multi- familyunitdeve|opment,1heCityvviUrevievvmnd,ifnecessaqy,revise1he|otareaperdweUinBunit requirement to a simple maximum density standard for more flexible yield. The City will also review and potentially revise height limits in the R-3 zoning district and evaluate the continued need for minimum unit sizes for residential development or the need for heigh limit differentiation in different parts of the R-3 zone. The current residential development standards for single-family development are shown inTable D,5 and development standards for multi -family development are summarized in Table To increase transparency and certainty in the development application process as required by law, the City has a variety of tools available for developers. The City's Community Development Department home page has links to the City's online land use plans (General Plan, Specific Plans, and Zoning Ordinance) aswell as helpful information related tucurrent planning efforts such as new developments standards, the update to the General Plan Housing Element, and the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan adoption. Direct links are also provided below:
•
• Housing Element Update: www.ovwneycu.v/gvvu/~'/v« uewm/u"m"v°,"""=.`v' deve|opment/pbnnino/houain0'e|ement+update
• Zoning Ordinance:
• Specific Plan documents:
• NevvRanchoLosAmi0osSouth[ampusSpec#lmP|an:h11ps:// www.dovvneyca.org/our- cky/departmen1s/cemmunky'deve|opment/p|annin0/nancho'aouth-campuo • New single-family residential development standards:
~- ^
� rxuonthe entitlement process:

Lot area - minimum (square feet)
Lot width minimum (feet)
Lot depth - minimum (feet)
interior lots
cornerlots
50 Lot depths shall bewithin ten percent (1D%)the average depth ofthe two (2) �abutting R'1lots onboth sides ofthe subject lot located unthesamesideofthe street.

Corner lots shall be within ten percent (10%) the average depth of the adjoining two R-I lots along the common :ront yard fronta e.

Floor area ratio — maximum (o)

Building separation - minimum
(feet)(h)
wall to wall 5 5 5 5 5
eave to eave 3 3 3 3 3
Walkway width — maximum (feet) 6 6 6 6 6
Parking for Single Family Dwellings 2.0 enclosed covered spaces within a garage for dwelling units with less than 3,375 square feet of habitable space
• 3.0 enclosed covered spaces within a garage for dwelling units equal to or above 3,375 square feet and equal to or below 4,500 square feet of habitable space
• 4.0 covered spaces within a garage for dwelling units with greater than 4,500 square feet of habitable space
Source: City of Downey Municipal Code, 2021
Notes:
(a) Single-family dwelling units in the R-1 Zone are eligible for a 0.05 FAR bonus for providing renewable energy sources, for a maximum FAR of

0.50, in accordance with the provisions of Section 9312.08(B)(2). (b) Porch features, such as but not limited to entry porches, covered patios, and porte-cocheres, must have a top -of -plate height equal to or less than the first floor top -of -plate height of the main structure, not to exceed twelve feet (12'). Top -of -peak height must be equal to or less than the top -of -peak height of the main structure, not to exceed sixteen feet (16'). Slope and pitch must be equal to main structure. (c) Unless the property is identified on the prevailing setback map, as adopted by the Commission, in which case the greater of the two setbacks shall apply.
(d) Garage setbacks are subject to Sections 9710 and 9534.22. (e) Any decimal fraction shall be rounded up to the nearest inch. (f) 1st floor side yard setbacks may be reduced subject to Section 9534. (9) Exclusive of porches, balconies, garages, or other such accessory structures or architectural features. (h) Building separation for rear detached garages is also subject to back up triangle requirements located in Section 9710.

D Veloament
e Stariclard
. . .... ....
. ... .. .
. . . . ........ . . . . .......
.. . .... . ..

Lot area - minimum (square feet)
Lot area per dwelling unit - minimum
1,980
(square feet)
11'
1,815 (for lots greater
Lot width - minimum (feet)
Building height - maximum (feet)
main • •
1ee or wo stories
35 feet or three stories,
whichever is less
whichever is less (a)
accessory building,
12 feet
12 feet
Yard setbacks -minimum (feet) front
f ront
20 15
15 rear
20 see note (b)
see note (b)
Yard setbacks (side) minimum (feet)
interior N
street
Dwelling unit size - minimum (square
studio units
one (1) bedroom
two (2) bedroom
three (3) bedroom
fqqLj�q bedroom
Buildihgsepa(4tibh - minimum (feet)
Main building and detached garage
�� _- minimum ftet)
Usable open space area per d11
welling
unit — minimum (square feet)
5 10
700
850
1,100
1,300
10 5
NOT11
5 W

7.5 500
600
800
1,000
1,300
10 5
S
5 (C)

7.5 500
600
800
1,000
1,300
10 Parking for Multi -Family Dwellings * Apartments, condominiums, duplexes, lofts, townhouses, and other multi -family dwelling units: IUcovered spaces within agarage; plus O.5 guest parking space per unit
• Senior citizen housing development: 2per dwelling unit, plus O25per unit for guest parking
�• Affordable housing projects: consistent with State law Source: City ofDowney Municipal Code, 2020
(1) When abutting R-1 or R -2 zoned properties, the variable height requirement shall apply in accordance with Section es34.24. wvvhenthe rear yard abuts anR-1 Zone, the following minimum setbacks are required: twenty (20) feet for a one (1) story building, thirty (30) feet for atwo (z)story building, and forty-six (*a)feet for athree (a)story building. When the rear yard area abuts ofully dedicated public alley, the following minimum setbacks are required: no setback required for a one (1) story building, ten (mfeet) for atwo <qstory building, and twenty-six feet for a three (3) story building. When the rear yard area abuts another R-3 Zone the following minimum setbacks are required: ten (m) feet for aone (1) story building, fifteen (zs)feet for vtwo (z)story building, and twenty (zu)feet for athree (a)mnryhunumo' wvvxenabutting the n'/Zone, the minimum setback shall ueten <uVfeet. w/sxcmuve,xporches, balconies, garages, orother such accessory structures o,architectural features. (1) Each additional bedroom over four (4) shall be a minimum of one hundred thirty (130) square feet.

Parking for Multi -Family Developments
Adequate parking for residential projects contributes tothe value ofaproject, the safety ofresidents, and its appearance. However, excessive parking standards can pose a significant constraint tothe development of housing because it reduces the land and financing availability for project amenities or additional units. The City's parking requirements are based on unit type and size as specified in Tables

3.3, 3.5 and 3.6. Parking standards in Downey are not considered a significant constraint to housing development. The City's parking standards are typical for suburban communities and reductions for affordable and senior housing are provided for by State law. Developers of affordable and senior housing who are eligible for a density bonus pursuant to Government Code Section 65919-65918 and projects development under the streamlined provisions of SB 35 are eligible to use parking standards established by State law. The 50-unit Downey View affordable housing development requested and was granted an increase in the proportion of compact parking spaces. A current project under review has requested a concession to allow a maximum of two spaces per unit (no guest parking) and a reduction in the required dimensions ofparking spaces.

The Downtown Downey Specific Plan parking requirements are based on the benefits of shared (joint use) parking and the existing surplus of parking available within the Specific Plan area. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan provides for lower parking standards for multi -family housing, 1.7 spaces per ownership unit and 1.5 spaces per rental unit. As guest parking is accommodated through available unit). As part of Housing Element implementation, the City will create a new zone and development standards to implement the General Plan Mixed -Use designation and adopt standards that allow for a minimum density of at least 30 units per acre, including parking (Program 1.3).

On- and Off -Site Improvement Requirements
Site improvements and property dedications are important components of new development and contribute to the creation of quality housing, providing requisite infrastructure and property enhancements. Housing construction in Downey is subject to a variety of site improvement and buildin2

code requirements. Developers are generally responsible for covering the full costufwater, sewer, road, and drainage improvements to serve their projects.

On -site improvements typically include private or shared driveways, parking areas, drainage, sections of underground pipe, urban runoff water quality controls, and amenities such as landscaping, fencing, open space, and park facilities. Off -site innprovementstypica|lyindude:

Sections ofroadway, medians, bridges, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes Water and sewer systems connections
Public facilities for fire, school, and recreation, or fair -share fees based on nexus studies on- and off -site improvement requirements for residential development in Downey are imposed on a case -by -case basis. In general, full street width dedication is required and construction of sidewalks where widening is needed. The typical residential street in Downey has a 60-foot width, which includes 36 feet from curb -to -curb and a 12-foot-wide parkway/sidewalk on each side of the street. Project applicants are required to cover all public right-of-way improvements per City standards. On- and off - site improvements have not been determined to be a constraint to the development of affordable housing, as they are uniformly applied and necessary to meet public health and safety requirements and provide public benefit.

In May 2021, the City adopted subdivision standards for single family R-1 zones, and it includes standards for minimum lot dimensions; lot placement and orientation; private roads; parking; and landscaping. R,2and R-3standards have not been changed.

Locally Adopted Ordinances
State law requires that cities include an analysis of any locally adopted ordinance that directly impacts the cost and supply of residential development, such as inclusionary housing ordinances and short-term rental ordinances. The City of Downey has neither of these ordinances nor any other ordinance, including those applicable to the division of land, that restrict residential development or the use of residential properties. In 2021, the City initiated an inclusionary housing feasibility study and, if shown to be appropriate for Downey, will consider adopting an inclusionary housing ordinance and program during the planning period. As the City studies its viability, it will also determine what constraints such anordinance might have onresidential development inthe City. |naddition toland use controls, local building codes also affect the cost ufhousing. Downey has adopted the 2019 edition of the California Building Code, based upon the 2018 International Building Code (IBC), which establishes minimum construction standards. As required of all jurisdictions in California, Downey has adopted the 2019 California Green Building Code established construction standards necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. Provisions in the California Building Code include measures to ensure barrier -free design in all buildings, facilities, site work, and other developments to which this code applies and to ensure that they are accessible to and usable by and/or for persons with disabilities.

The City has adopted local amendments to the Building Code. Many are technical in nature and relate to structural seismic resistance, seismic design provisions, and the quality of materials used during

The City enforces code compliance to promote property maintenance in accordance with the City Zoning and Building ordinances and State and County Health Codes. The Code Enforcement Division is responsible for code enforcement activities in the City, and compiles statistics on the number and type of code complaints it receives. According to the Code Enforcement Division, 5,768 code enforcement cases were filed in 2020, related to building regulations and health and safety.

Code enforcement cases typically involve required maintenance of a property or illegal construction within the City's residential zoning districts. Residents are encouraged to apply for rehabilitation assistance when applicable, and they may be eligible for a grant up to $35,000 to be used for exterior painting, the correction of code enforcement violations, accessibility improvements for the physically disabled, and to fix health and safety concerns. Some mandatory improvements residents may be asked to address are items such as the installation of smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, security locks on all doors and windows, attic insulation, and lead -based paint removal.

According to the Chief Code Enforcement Officer, investigations of property maintenance complaints usumUyinvo|veuveqJrownoudun'kept|andscaping,pee|ingpointbnokenwindowsandscreens, deteriorated roofs and other property deficiencies that indicate prolonged deferred maintenance. The illegal conversion of garages to living quarters, on the other hand, can indicate the presence of overcrowding due to a lack of affordable housing in the community. Although there are other categories of code enforcement complaints received by the Code Enforcement Division, these two types of complaints are the most common that relate to housing condition and affordability.

Article Vill, Chapter 7 (Abandoned and Vacant Property Registration and Maintenance) of the Downey Municipal Code, requires registration of unoccupied properties toguard against blight and protect investments ufsurrounding property and business owners. These regulations also help guard against deterioration of vacant residential properties, thus helping to protect the existing housing stock.

Housing Element law requires jurisdictions to identify available sites in appropriately zoned districtswith development standards that encourage the development of a variety of housing types for all income levels. These include multi -family rental housing, factory -built housing, mobile homes, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. The following paragraphs describe how the City makes provisions for these types ofhousing.

Rental Housing
Multi -family housing represents 42 percent of all housing units in the City. Downey's zoning code allows mu|ti-fami|yunitsmspermittedusesintheR'2(nadup|exes),R'3,R'3'O,andMixed'Usezones.The[ity has also identified the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area as an opportunity area for the development ufmulti-family housing.

The number of multi -family units has increased in recent years as underdeveloped multi -family zoned lots with only one unit have been redeveloped at higher densities. Examples of recent multi -family development on parcels where asingle unit existed include:
*8l394thStreet— 4'unhdevelopment

* 9553 Firestone Blvd- 24-unit condominium development
* 8104 Stewart and Gray Rd- 7-unit townhome development * 10734 Paramount Blvd (multiple addresses)- 117-unit townhome development * 7940 Telegraph Rd- 39-unit townhome development
In 2015, the first new multi -family residential project was developed within the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area. The 50-unit project, named Downey View, is deed restricted for very low (five units) and low income (45 units) households. The Specific Plan area offers significant opportunities to accommodate the City's RHNA allocation, given allowed densities and the sites available.

I 57KNoMIMFM - . - I a Is I - P. —HE VA - T
0 ZQ 9 1,40111 17M&Z1!MTV41ffiJ0J 111:4
VA%J, I
modifications.

Mobile Homes/Manufactured Housing
State law requires that mobile and manufactured homes be allowed in residential zones. These units cannot be regulated by any planning fees or review processes not applicable to conventional single- ftimiWo-weffings. However, the architectural design of manufactured or mobile homes can be regulatef by the City. Under the City's zoning regulations, manufactured housing (listed in the zoning code as prefabricated housing) is a permitted use in all residential zones. Mobile home developments (mobile home parks) are permitted with a CUP in all residential zones. Data available from the Department of Homeland Security and verified by the City show there were 189 mobile homes in Downey in four Mobile Home Parks in 2018 (see Table 3.7 below).'
ACE Trailer Park
Orange Grove Mobile Home Park
SUN Trailer Park
Tri-City Mobile Lodge
Source: DHS, 2018; Downey Planning Division,
12265 Woodruff Avenue
70 Downey, CA 90241
13331 Lakewood Boulevard
48 Downey, CA 90242
12532 Lakewood Boulevard
30 Downey, CA 90242
- ---------------- -
13441 Lakewood Boulevard
41 Downey, CA 90242
Total:
189
Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) can be a unique source of affordable housing since they are smaller than primary units and do not have direct land acquisition costs. ADU development expands housing ty X increasing the number of rental
units available within existing neighborhoods. SCAG 2020 affordability estimates show that about 69 percent of ADUs would be affordable to lower income households. Consistent with the Government 4 Homeland Infrastructure Foundation Level Data, Mobile Home Parks, Downey, CA, 2018, accessed August 2020 from: I iI
, q : I' I i, I mo latform.o endata. I i i 1,'11, r asets/mobile-horne-!2arksLdata

Code Section 65852.3, Downey permits ADUs by right in single-family residential zones [R'1] and are subject to all development standards of the underlying zoning district with a few minor exceptions. The City will continue to promote ADUs as a key strategy to accommodate both the low and moderate income RHWAallocations.

The City last updated its ADU ordinance in 2018, expanding the areas citywide where ADUs are permitted. The State Legislature has passed numerous changes tothe ADU requirements to promote their development, including additional regulations that became effective after the City's 2018 ADU ordinance update. These include allowing ADUs to be built concurrently with a single-family home, expandin0areasw/hereADUscanbebui|ttoinc|udeaUzonin0districtsthateUovvsinB|e4ami|yuses, modifying fees from utilities such as special districts and water corporations, reducing parking requirements, and eliminating owner -occupancy restrictions at least through 2025. The Housing Plan commits the City to adopting an updated ABU ordinance tofully comply with all current ADU regulations set forth in the Government Code.

Emergency Shelters
SB 2 (Housing for the Homeless) of 2008 requires that jurisdictions, within one year of the 4th cycle Housing Element adoption, amend the zoning ordinance to identify a zone or zones where year-round emergency shelters for the homeless would be permitted by right without discretionary review. As result of SB 2, Government Code Section 65583(a)(4) allows limited flexibility for local governments to apply written, objective development and management standards.

In 2013, Downey passed an ordinance amending the zoning code to allow emergency shelters (with up to 30 occupants) and transitional living facilities in the Hospital -Medical Arts (H-M) zone by right without any other discretionary permit required. Emergency shelters with more than 30 occupants require a CUP inthe H'K8Zone.

In addition to the development standards of the zone in which they are located, emergency shelters for homeless persons are subject to and comply with standards and regulations including the following key w Capacity: A single emergency shelter for thirty (30) occupants, or a combination of multiple shelters with acombined capacity not toexceed thirty (]O)occupants, shall beallowed asa permitted use, consistent with Section 65583(a)(4)(A) of the Government Code. Any emergency shelter with a capacity greater than thirty (30) occupants shall also be subject to the approval of oconditional use permit, asset forth inSection 0OJ4nfthis Code. • Hours of Operation: The facility shall operate on a first -come, first -serve basis with clients only permitted on -site and admitted to the facility between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. during Pacific Daylight Time, and 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. during Pacific Standard Time. Clients must vacate the facility by8:0Ua.m. and have noguaranteed bed for the next night. Acurfew nfIO:OUp.m.(or earlier) shall beestablished and strictly enforced and clients shall not beadmitted after the curfew.
• Separation: To avoid over -concentration of emergency shelter facilities, a minimum distance of five hundred (500) feet shall be maintained from any other emergency shelter, as measured from the property line.
• Staffing: A minimum of one (1) staff member per fifteen (15) beds shall be awake and on duty when the facility is open. Facility staff shall be trained in operating procedures, safety plans, and assisting clients. The facility shall not employ staff who have been convicted of a felony or who

are required toregister asasex registrant underPena|CodeSeotionZ9U.

Parking: I uncovered space per 4 beds plus I uncovered space per staff member.

The City may regulate proximity tuother emergency shelters, ifemergency shelters are not required to be more than 300 feet apart. No other separation requirements are permitted. Program 3.5 is included in the Housing Plan (Chapter 6) and includes an action item to bring the City's emergency shelter ordinance into compliance, specifically related to the City's distancing requirement for shelters.

Two clusters of land are zoned H'M, which promotes medical offices and other medical -related uses. one cluster of approximately 37 acres in the Downtown/Brookshire Avenue area includes the Downey Regional Medical Center and PIH Health Downey Hospital, Downey Community Health Center, Brookshire Manor senior community, and the Family Support Center. A second smaller cluster of nine acres near the Downey Landing commercial development includes several assisted living and nursing home facilities. As of early 2021, no properties are available in these two areas to accommodate shelters for the 231 unsheltered homeless persons identified in the City during the 2020 Los Angeles County Point -In -Time Homeless Count. The City will be amending its Zoning Code to allow for development in the M'Zzone instead ofthe H'K4Zone.

There are 295 acres of land zoned M-2 (General Manufacturing). The M-2 zone was chosen over the M-1 zone due to the availability of land but both zones have similar uses and are in the same areas of the City. Uses in the K8'2zone are not as intensive asthe zone's name suggest. Most uses are most closely related to light manufacturing or commercial manufacturing. Many of the uses are larger business park- stylebui|dinGssomeofamoneoommercia|natune.Thezoneis|argeenuughtoaccommodate8shehers needed for the 231 unsheltered persons identified in the 2020 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count. The location of the zone is conducive to transit and pedestrian access as it is near major roadways such as Lakewood and Firestone Boulevards, Imperial Highway, Woodruff Avenue, and Stewart and Gray Road.

The zone iaalso close to|'6O5and |'1D5freeways a»well as the Norwalk and Lakewood Boulevard rail stations for the Metro Green line. Metro bus and Downey Link bus stops (the [ity'spublic transit system) are also accessible from all locations in the zone.

AB 101 from the 2019 legislative session requires that Low -Barrier Navigation Centers be allowed as a by -right use in mixed use and nonresidential zones that permit (by -right or conditionally) multi -family uses. Low Barrier Navigation centers currently are not addressed in the zoning code. The City is creating a new Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan, which will allow for emergency shelters in three of four districts, and will include Low Barrier Navigation Centers in a manner that meets the requirements ofA8 181.

Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing
Pursuant to State law, Downey permits transitional or supportive housing (with six or fewer residents) in all residential zones, aswell osinthe H-&4zone. |nDowney, transitional and supportive housing are considered single-family or multi -family uses and thus are held to the same underlying zoning standards asother residential uses inthe same residential zoning district.

Effective January 1,J819,A8216Z(Supportive Housing Streamlining Act) requires supportive housing to beconsideredauseby'hghtinzunesvvhevemulti-fami|ymndmixed'usesarepermitted,induding nonresidential zones permitting multi -family uses if the proposed housing development meets specified criteria. The |avv prohibits local governments from imposing any minimum parking requirement for units occupied by supportive housing residents if the development is located within one-half mile of a public

transit stop. AB2162also requires local entities Uustreamline the approval ofhousing projects containing a minimum amount of supportive housing (at least 25 percent of units or 12 units, whichever is greater) by providing a ministerial approval process, removing the requirement for CEQA analysis, and removing the requirement for a CUP orother similar discretionary entitlements.

Downey isopen toaministerial review process for supportive housing. The City believes that this use would be appropriate in the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan area. The new Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan (currently under development) will allow for transitional and supportive housing |namanner that meets the requirements ofA82l62.

Single Room Occupancy(SRO)Housing
Single -room occupancy hotels and/or boarding homes are collectively referred to as SROs. SRO units are one -room units intended for occupancy by single individual. An SRO is distinct from a studio or efficiency unit in that a studio is a one -room unit that must contain a kitchen and bathroom. Although SRO units are not required to have a kitchen or bathroom, many SROs have one or the other. Downey's zoning code lists SRO housing in the Hospital Medical Arts (H-M) Zone as a permitted use and as a conditionally permitted use inthe R'Sresidential zone.

Employee Housing
|naccordance with State Employee Housing Act (Sections 17OZ1.5and 17OZ1.6ofthe Health and Safety Code), employee housing for six or fewer employees to be treated as a single-family structure and permitted inthe same manner asother dwellings ofthe same type inthe same zone and employee housing consisting of no more than 13 units or3G beds to he permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses inthe same zone. According toState law (Sections 17O%1.Sufthe Health and Safety Code), employee housing shall not be included within the definition of a boarding house, rooming house, hotel, dormitory, or other similar term that implies that the employee housing is a business run for profit or differs in any other way from a family dwelling. No conditional use permit, zoning variance, or other zoning clearance shall be required of employee housing that serves six or fewer employees that is not required of a family dwelling of the same type in the same zone. Use of a family dwelling for purposes of employee housing serving six or fewer persons shall not constitute a change of occupancy for purposes of Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 17910) or local building codes.

Employee housing is not addressed in the City's zoning regulations and as an urbanized community, there is no land within Downey designated for agricultural use and no zone allows agricultural uses. To comply with the State Employee Housing Act (Section 17D0Oofthe Health and Safety [ode),Program

1.3 in the Housing Plan requires the Zoning Code to be updated to define Employee Housing and address State requirements for allowing Employee Housing for six or fewer employees.

Housing element law requires that in addition to the needs analysis for people with disabilities, the housing element must analyze potential governmental constraints to the development, improvement, and maintenance of housing for people with disabilities, demonstrate local efforts to remove any such constraints, and provide for reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities through programs that remove constraints.

Zoning and Land Use
Under the California State Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act(LantermanAc),small state -licensed residential care facilities for six or fewer persons must be permitted in all zones that allow sin0|e'ormuki-fami|yuseo,subjeuttothesemepermitpnnoessingrequivementsanddeve|opment standards; Downey iscompliant with the LmnternnanAct. Aspreviously indicated, the Downey Municipal Code permits residential care facilities, including facilities for the disabled (with six or fewer residents), by right in all zones that allow residential uses. For group homes with seven or more residents, the City requires approval of a CUP in all residential zones. There are no facility concentration or distance requirements or similar limitations for either type of residential care facility. The applicable development standards are no more restrictive than standards that apply to other residential uses of the same type permitted in the same zone. The CUP requirement for facilities with 7 or more residents is also not an impediment. City records show that applications for group homes for 7+ persons are not common. CUP findings for approval are asfollows:

1. That the requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the intent and purpose of this article nrthe Cit/s General Plan orthe public convenience orgeneral welfare ufpersons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof;
Z. That the requested use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development ufthe area inwhich itisproposed tubelocated;

3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; and

4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways inthe area.

Definition of Family
The City of Downey zoning code defines a "family" as "two (2) or more persons bearing the generic character of, and living together as, a relatively permanent single bona fide housekeeping unit in a domestic relationship based upon birth, marriage, or other domestic bond of social, economic, and psychological commitment to each other, as distinguished from a group occupying a boarding house, club, dormitory, fraternity, lodging house, motel, rehabilitation center, rest home, or sorority." Reasonable Accommodation
Physical disabilities can hinder access to housing units of traditional design and limit one's ability to thrive. According to U.S. Census American Community Survey data, nearly 5,000 people in Downey have an ambulatory disability, and approximately 4,100 people have difficulty living independently. Nearly one in four seniors in Downey, or 23.1 percent of residents over the age of 65, have an ambulatory disability, while l9.6percent ofseniors cannot live independently.

Both the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act direct local governments to make reasonable accommodation (i.e., modifications or exceptions) in their zoning laws and other land use regulations to allow disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. For example, it may be a reasonable accommodation to waive a setback requirement so that elevated ramping can be constructed to provide access to a dwelling unit for a resident who has mobility impairments. Whether a modification is reasonable depends on the circumstances and must be decided on a case -by -case basis. The City is in the process ofcreating a reasonable accommodation ordinance, to becompleted bythe end 2DZ1.

in bathrooms, lower cabinets, and elevators. The City complies with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the most recent California Building Code regulations. In addition, the City 2dministers the Housing Rebate and Grant Program that provides financial assistance to disabled households to perform modifications such as those described above. development fees to recoup costs and ensure that essential services and infrastructure are available when needed. The total fees vary from project to project based on type, existing infrastructure, and the cost of mitigating environmental impacts. Fees are usually collected upon filing of an application for development projects that require discretionary approval or at the time building permits are issued.

Fees which are typically charged for a standard residential development are summarized in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8: Fees Charged for Residential Development,
Planning and Application Fees
Zone Variance $3,409
riance (R-1 Zone Only)
Conditional Use Permits
--�� —
General Plan Amendment �
Zone Change Code Amendment
Site Plan Review $3,196
Planned Unit Development $5,327
Specific Plan Direct Cost + 10%
Subdivision
Certificate of Compliance
Lot Line Adjustment/Lot Merger
Parcel Map
_
Tract Map
Environmental

Fees collected from residential developers include school fees ($3.79 per square foot) and an Art in Public Places fee, which applies to developments of more than four units at a value of one percent of for each residential unit built and is adjusted annually for the Consumer Price Index. The current rate is $500 per newly built single-family dwelling unit and $380 per unit for multi -family dwellings. Two additional development impact fees include the Records Management Fee (0.2 percent of building permit valuation) and General Plan Revision Fee (0.2 percent of building permit valuation). tn electric, gas, and telephone. No utility tax is charged for water use.

NALWAZAWIAG_ • auwwl�•�
in Downey, a 2,333 square -foot single-family unit and for a 916 square -foot multiple -family unit. For a tfAwlh�tWK0. ee—st—o—ta _1a wLQ>d mate k 18,803. For a multiple -family unit, -m i iWr_Lzi.W._ftd_f o r
larger residential buildings, the Art in Public Places fee.

Building Permit
Plan Check Fee
Disabled Access Plan Check Fee
Fire Plan Check Fee
Energy Conservation Plan Check Fee
Electrical permit
Mechanical permit
Mechanical Plan Check Fee
Plumbing permit
School Fee(')
Parkland Dedication Fee
Art in Public Places Fee(')
Deputy Inspector Registration
General Plan Revision
Plans Archival/Record Management
Strong Motion -State Quake Tax
Green Building Standards
TOTAL
$3,487
$1,149
$2,964
$977
N/A
$107
$137
$35
$326
$107
$220
$207
$380
$291
N/A
$146
$499
$372
$8,842
$2,621
$500
$380
N/A
N/A
$86
$21
$653
$233
$653
$233
$42
$61
$14
$5
$18,803
$6,945
Notes:
(a) Calculations based on a single-family unit 2,333 sq. ft. of living area with 535 sq. ft. garage space, with building valuation per unit of $326,619.

(WCalculations based moone unit ofamulti-family four -unit development with y'x*4sq. ft. uftotal living area with attached 1,srysq. ft. carport. Total building valuation is $465,855. (c)School fees are calculated as $y.7eper residential square foot. (d) Art in Public Places fee is calculated as one percent of valuation on residential buildings of more than four units with total building valuation of$so0,onoo,more.

Source: City of Downey, 2020
Development fees make up approximately six percent of the median home purchase price .5 Because many of these fees are determined by square footage, valuation, and factors such as the number of charged to a developer for every residential development. costs. Given that cost recovery percentages for these departments were well under the typical ra7ng seen in other jurisdictions, the study suggested the City consider adopting and implementing a Cost Recovery Policy, including a mechanism to annually update fees.' To assist developers and property owners during the permitting process, the Building and Safety Divisior a proposed project. The fee scheduled is available on the City's website at www.downeyca.org/our- Processing and permit procedures may pose a considerable constraint to the production and improvement of housing. Common constraints include lengthy processing time, unclear permitting procedures, layered reviews, multiple discretionary review requirements, and costly conditions of approval. These constraints increase the final cost of housing, uncertainty in the development of the software updates, which will allow the City to implement industry standard best practices such as these changes will reduce the review period and permit issuance period for infill projects.

Implementation is excepted by late 2021.

TO
of various levels of complexity and requiring different entitlements. Processing times vary with the complexity of the project. The tables below outline the typical timelines for various residential projects.

Table 3.10 focuses more specifically on the individual entitlement approvals that may be required, ' Sarah Mawhurter,David Garcia, and Hay|ey Raetz, ItAll Adds Up: The Cost of Housing Development Fees in Seven Colifbnnk/Cities, TernerCenter for Housing Innovation, University ofCalifornia Berkeley, March ZO18,pp.20-21, accessed from http://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/uploads/Development_Fees_Report_Final_2.pdf oK8utrixConsu|tingGmup'CustofServices(UserFee)Study,Fino|Report:CityofDmwney,[a|ifomia'Apri|2O18,

generally identifies the typical approvals required for single-family and multi -family projects, along with the estimated processing times of the planning and building departments. need for any General Plan amendments and more complex CEQA review, such as an EIR. *These time `—periods begin when acomplete application is submitted and are extended when additional information isrequested bythe City.

The timefmmeybelow are target issuance date —when the applicant can expect a decision ntheir application.

Ministerial Review
60 days
—�O
90 days
days (CUP is common for a large
Not common for multiple family
Condition Use Permit
residential care facility in the R-1
projects
Zoning Amendment (Zone Change)
3-6 months
6-9 months
General Plan Amendment
6-9 months
6-9 months
Site Plan Revie
No SPR required for SF
6-9 months
Tract Maps
3-6 months
4-6 months
Parcel Map
3-6 months
6-9 months
Initial Environmental Study
Not common for SF
6-9 months
Environmental Impact Report
Not common for SF
6-9 months
Source: City mDowney, zozo
Bldg. Plan Check
Tent. Tract/Parcel
Site Plan Review
Site Plan Review
Review
Map
Typical Approval
Permitting
Planning
Planning
Planning
Requirements
Commission
Commission
Commission
Inspections
City Council
Plan Check
Plan Check
Final Map
Permitting
Permitting
Plan Check
Inspection
Inspection_
Permitting
Inspection
Planning =
3-6 months if no
Planning = 30 days
accompanying
Planning = 3-6 mos.

Planning = 6-9 mos.

Est. Total Processing
Plan Check = 10-14
rezone or plan
Plan Check =
Plan Check =
Time
days
amendment
60-90 days
60-90 days
Plan Check =
30-60 days
Note: Processing times may vary by sq. ft., building
type, design, complexity, and volume of workload; inspection times not included

Streamlining
In response toState law, California cities are required to improve the efficiency ofpermit and review prooessesbyprovidinQ"one'stoppnocesin0."TheCityofDow/neyhaofuUyimp|ementedtheprovisions of the Permit Streamlining Act, which limits processing times for entitlements to a 30-day review period and 60 days for a hearing. Periodic surveys conducted by City staff show that local processing times are comparable tothose experienced inneighboring communities.

Toencourage and facilitate the development ofavariety nfhousing types, City staff continues to monitor permit processing times to ensure the fastest possible turnaround for applications. The City diligently complies with all applicable streamlining policies and practices. Downey has modified its application packet to simplify and streamline the development application process and works with developers to ensure efficient case processing. In 2018, the City digitized resources, including archived building permits and planning entitlements, to further streamline permit processing and reduce the amount of time it takes to conduct property research. Upgrades were also made to the City's permitting software to ensure accurate information and speedier service. This includes zoning, general plan, land use, property owner information, prior planning cases, county assessor maps, and digital aerial photographs for each parcel.

Downey's comprehensive zoning map and General Plan land use map have also been digitized using enhanced geographic information system technology. The City isworking to establish electronic plan check for 2021 for a more streamlined plan check review. Also, the City is committed to updating ADU standards and permit streamlining to comply with recent State legislation.

SB 35 Approval Process
SB 35 requires cities and counties to streamline review and approval of eligible affordable housing projects by providing a ministerial approval process, exempting such projects from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). When the State determines that jurisdintionsheveinsuffidentprogresstowardtheir|owepincomeRHNA(very|owand|nvvincome), these jurisdictions are subject to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 [Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017] streamlining) for proposed developments with at least 50 percent affordability. If the jurisdiction also has insufficient progress toward its above -moderate -income RHNA, then the jurisdiction is subject to the more inclusive streamlining for developments with at least 10 percent affordability. SB 35will automatically sunset onJanuary 1,2UZ6.

AsofJuly 1\2D2O H[Ddetermined that Downey issubject toS83Sstreamlining for proposed developments with 50 percent or greater affordability. As of early 2021, the City received one inquiry for SB 35 streamlining on an affordable housing project, but it did not qualify, so an SB 35 application for this development was not submitted. To accommodate any future SB 35 applications or inquiries, the Housing Plan includes a program to create and make available to interested parties an informational packet that explains the SB 35 streamlining provisions in Downey and provides SB 35 eligibility information.
yWanyminorpennhsaneissuedrequihnAonly"over{he'counter"approvaLsuohaoforresidentia|room additions and residential rehabilitation permits (plumbing, electrical, roofing). In addition, the City allows the issuance of separate grading and foundation permits prior to the issuance of the building

permits. Plans can be submitted to plan check prior to the Planning Commission and City Council final approval of the project with the submittal of a hold harmless agreement.

For single-family and two-family residence developments, no discretionary review process is required, and the proposed residential building application can proceed directly toplan check (assuming the proposed residence meets of all the zoning requirements). The City Planner reviews all appeals of staff decisions regarding R'lZone development plan checks.

Discretionary permits (such asvariances, CUPs,and tentative maps) typically require three tusix months to review and process for a public hearing, and processing time varies with the type of environmental review required. The Planning Commission remains the only entity in the discretionary review process, except when the processing involves a legislative action, or unless a Planning Commission decision is appealed. |nthese cases, approval bythe City Council isrequired.

For multi -family projects, applications are subject Site Plan Review process, typically auix-to'nine'month process from the time an application is filed and building permits are issued for the project.

There is no design review requirement for single-family or multi -family residential projectsinthe City.

However, a Site Plan Review is required for projects within the R-3 zone. This processreviews all site improvements, parking, landscaping, open space, and amenities, as well as architectural design of the housing development. The application is reviewed for compliance with development standards as well as architectural style and massing. The Downey Municipal Code (Section 9820.08) requires the following findings be made in a positive manner to support approval of the application. • That the site plan is consistent with the goals and polices embodied in the General Plan and other applicable plans and policies adopted bythe Council; • That the proposed development is in accordance with the purposes and objectives of the zone inwhich the site islocated;
w That the proposed development's she plan and its design features, including architecture and landscaping, will integrate harmoniously and enhance the character and design of the site, the immediate neighborhood, and the surrounding areas ofthe City; • That the site plan and location of the buildings, parking areas, signs, landscaping, luminaries, and other site features indicate that proper consideration has been given to both the functional aspects of the site development, such as automobile and pedestrian circulation, and the visual effects ofthe development from the view ofthe public streets; • That the proposed development will improve the community appearance by preventing extremes of dissimilarity or monotony in new construction or in alterations of facilities; ��That the site plan and design considerations shall tend to upgrade property in the immediate neighborhood and surrounding areas with an accompanying betterment of conditions affecting the public health, safety, comfort, and welfare; and
• That the proposed development's site plan and its design features will include graffiti -resistant features and materials in accordance with the requirements of Section 4960 of Chapter 10 of Article |Vofthe zoning code.

The findings are objective and during the public hearing there is clear explanation that a project cannot

development. Recommendations to the applicant may be given on the night of the hearing where the hearing may be continued to a date certain once the applicant works with Planning staff. |naneffort to further streamline and encourage appropriate development, the proposed rezoning will include an update to development standards for multi -family projects that will not require the Site Plan Review process and allow for this review to be completed administratively without discretionary approval (Program 1.3). In addition, Program 3.3 is included and indicates that the City will adopt objective design standards to ensure that the City can provide local guidance on design and standards for by -right projects usallowed byState law.

Environmental Review
State regulations require environmental review of discretionary project proposals (e.g., subdivision maps, precise plans, use permits, etc.). Thedmeframes associated with environmental review are regulated by[E[V\.|ncompliance with the Permit Streamlining Act, City staff ensures that non - legislative proposals are heard at the Planning Commission within 60days nfreceipt ofan application being deemed complete.

In January 2017, Assembly Bill 686 (AB 686) introduced an obligation to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) into California state law. AB 686 defined "affirmatively further fair housing" to mean "taking meaningful actions, in addition to combat discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity" for persons of color, persons with disabilities, and other protected classes. The Bill added an assessment of fair housing to the Housing Element which includes the following components: a summary of fair housing issues and assessment of the City's fair housing enforcement and outreach capacity; an analysis of segregation patterns and disparities in access to opportunities, an assessment of contributing factors, and an identification offair housing goals and actions. The primary data source for the AFFHanalysis |sthe City of Downey 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (N) and the State of California Department ofHousing and Community Development (HCD)AFFHData Viewer.

Fair Housing Enforcementmwd Capacity
The City prepared an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Plan (AI) FY 2020-2024 to accompany the City of Downey's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program statutes. The 2020-2024 Al contains the following information about fair housing enforcement and capacity.

The City of Downey contracts with the Fair Housing Foundation (FHF), a nonprofit organization dedicated to affirmatively furthering fair housing choice through the provision of education and direct client services. To promote awareness of fair housing laws, FHF implements targeted outreach and education programs for Downey residents for housing consumers including homeowners, prospective homebuyers, and tenants, as well as housing providers such as sellers, owners, real estate professionals, brokers, landlords, and property management firms. Using available data to analyze current discrimination trends, FHF disseminates brochures that promote awareness of specific fair housing issues to ensure that all persons can secure safe and decent housing that they desire and can afford, without regard to their race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, familial status, marital status, disability, ancestry, age, source of income, orother characteristics protected by laws.

Direct client services range from providing advice concerning general housing issues to performing

investigations and advising residents of their rights and remedies under the law in cases where evidence sustains the allegations ofdiscrimination.

According 10the ZO21'2024Al, during the most recently completed fiscal year covering July 1,2O18,to June 30, 2019, FHF provided direct client services to 264 Downey residents, landlords, property owners, real estate professionals, and property seekers. Among the direct clients served, 80 percent were in- placetenantsofrenta|huusing,comprisin81he|aqQeatse0mentofDowneyresidentsrequesdn0 assistance from FHF.

General housing services provided by FHF involve the provision of advice to landlords,property owners, and tenants requesting advice on their rights and responsibilities under federal and State law. Most of the general housing services provided by FHF for Downey residents are by phone to FHF's toll -free hotline. Residents may speak with a trained staff member with expertise in the resolution of many common landlord -tenant disputes. Residents may also request to meet with FHF staff attheir Long Beach or Orange County offices. During FY 2018-2019, FHF received 304 landlord and tenant inquiries (not all of which required direct services) from Downey residents, of which 201 (61 percent) were resolved by FHF by phone orcorrespondence without referral to another agency. In most cases, residents were informed of the law, civil code, and available remedies for their question or issue.

Each of the Downey residents receiving fair housing services from FHF during FY 2018-2019 originated from a general housing inquiry. The initial screening process for each of the 304 general housing inquiries resulted in the referral of 14 inquiries to the FHF Discrimination Department for further investigation and analysis. Of the 14 fair housing inquiries during 2018-2019, 10 were counseled and resolved by FHF after review ufavailable facts and four inquiries required m case to be opened because information gathered through the screening and counseling phase substantiated possible discrimination.

Each of the four cases that were opened involved in -place tenants of rental housing and none involved residents seeking a rental opportunity. One case involved alleged discrimination based on mental disability, one based on physical disability, one based onfamilial status, and one based on race.

Segregation and Opportunity Patterns and Trends
The AFFH analysis must address areas of ongoing and concentrated segregation and integration and compare concentrations of protected characteristics and incomes. The following information discusses the levels of segregation and integration for race and ethnicity, income, familial status, persons with Race/Ethnicity
The ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing concerns as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such ashousehold size, |oma1iona|preferenoes and mobility. Hispanic residents make upmost ofthe City's population (74 percent). The AFFH Data Viewer provides a measurement of the predominant racial/ethnic group for each census tract and the extent of the group's prominence. This is measured as predominant (> 50 percent), sizeable (10-50 percent), and slim (< 10 percent). The entire city of Downey shows a Hispanic majority with a prominence value of 40 percent or greater. Only one other racial group in the City has a prominence value. Black residents have a prominence value of 3 percent, which is considered slim. Compared with the County of Los Angeles, the City has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents and a lower percentage of white, non -Hispanic residents. Since 2010, the proportion of all non -Hispanic race/ethnic groups have decreased. Figure 3'1shows the distribution ofnon-white

residents in Downey by Census block groups. Every block group in the City has a non-White population over GUpercent and there are nnconcentrations ofnon-White population.

A commonly used measure of segregation is the dissimilarity index which represents the extent to which the distribution of any two groups (frequently racial or ethnic groups) differs across census tracts or block groups. The values of the dissimilarity index range from 0 to 100, with a value of zero representing perfect integration between the racial groups in question, and a value of 100 representing perfect seBregadombetweentherada|Qroups."(AFFH'T).The[ityofDowney'sRado)/EthnicDissimi|arity Index presented in the 2020 Al compares extremely favorably to the Los Angeles/Orange County metro region interms nfabsolute values, meaning that Downey ixsignificantly more integrated than the region overall. However, an examination of overall trends reveals that the City is trending in the direction of more, not less, segregation at a rate that is significantly higher than that of the region overall. With respect1onon'vvhiteresidents,theieve|ofsegre0adonfromvvhites,asmeasuvedbytheDissimi|arity index, has increased byover S5 percent since 1990. By contrast, although Downey isless segregated than the region according to the Dissimilarity Index, the regional level of non-white/white segregation has only increased by slightly under three percent during the same period. This trend is even more pronounced for Hispanic residents, as well as Asian and Pacific Islander residents, as they have experienced increased segregation by around 51 and 85 percent respectively, compared to five percent and nine percent respectively in the region. Black residents have experienced a decrease in their score with respect to White residents, as their score has decreased by around three percent in the jurisdiction.

This is similar to what the region experienced as the region saw a decrease of about five percent.

To assist in this analysis of integration and segregation, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAQ created Opportunity Maps to identify resources levels across the state. These opportunity maps are made from composite scores of three different domains (economic, environmental, and education) made up of a set of indicaton.Thenpportunkymapsinc|udeameasurenr"M|ter"toidentifyareasvxithpoxertyandnyda| segregation (Census tracts with at least 30 percent of the population under the federal poverty line and a location quotient higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all people of color in comparison to the County). According to the California Fair Housing Task Force's 2021 opportunity maps, there are no census tracts or areas of high racial segregation and poverty in Downey. Regionally, areas with high segregation and poverty are located in cities west of Downey and in the south-central area of the City of Los Angeles. These include the cities of Cudahy, Bell Gardens, Maywood, Lynwood, and Huntington Park, and the South Los Angeles community (H[DAFFHData Viewer).

These areas also correspond to historic patterns of segregation and redlining (AFFH-Data Viewer). The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLQ a defunct financial services corporation from the 1930s, developed a neighborhood ranking system (known today as redlining) toassess credit -worthiness by mortgage security. The grades ranged from A toD,where Aincluded predominantly white orupper- midd|e-c|ussneiAhborhoodsthat1heHOLCdefinedasposin0minima|risk,andDinc|udedaveesthat predominandycontainedmaq8ina|ized|ow+inoomepopu|abnns,suchas]ewish,Aoian,W1enican,and Black residents. These areas were also more likely to be near industrial areas and have an older housing stock. The effects of disinvestments caused by redlining can still be observable today, where formerly redlined neighborhoods have fewer resources such as quality schools, access to fresh food and health care. Many of the neighborhoods mentioned above were graded C (Declining) or D (Hazardous) and are still challenged by high rates of segregation and poverty in the 21st century. Historically, Downey only had afew census tracts that were graded onthe HDLC'sranking system, and ofthese most were classified asC(Dec|ining)and located along Firestone Boulevard.

Persons with Disabilities
Disabled residents face housing access and safety challenges. Disabled people, in most cases, are of limited incomes and often receive Social Security income only. As such, much of their monthly income is often devoted to housing costs. in addition, disabled persons may face difficulty finding accessible housing because of the limited number of such units. In Downey, 9,567 residents (8.5 percent) are living with a disability, of which 1,138 or 1.0 percent of residents are living with a developmental disability.

Figure 3.2 shows the population of persons with a disability by Census tract. At a regional level, Downey is similar to the rest of the county in that almost all the census tracts have less than 20 percent of their population living with adisability. However, the map reveals there are slightly more disabled residents in two tracts (10 to 20 percent of residents). One tract is located north of Firestone Boulevard between Paramount and Lakewood Boulevard and includes the Civic Center. The second tract is in the area northeast ofLakewood Boulevard and Florence Avenue.

Familial Status
Single -parent households require special consideration and assistance because of the greater need for day care, health care, and other services. In particular, female -headed households with children tend to have lower incomes and a greater need for affordable housing and accessible daycare and other supportive services. In Downey, 6,832 (20.6 percent) of households are female headed; most female- headedhouseho|dsareren1en(61.2perment).A|an8erpnnpnrtionoffema|e'headedhouseho|ds|ivein poverty (16Jpercent) compared with all City households (9.9percent).

Figures 3.3 and 3.4 show the percent of children in married -couple households in the region and the percent of children in female -headed households (no spouse/partner) by Census tract. Several areas in Downey, north of Firestone Boulevard, show concentration of children living in married couple households (more than 80 percent of children). Figure 3.4 shows that all tracts in the City have less than 40 percent of children living in female -headed households. While there is no major concentration of children living in female -headed households, areas of the City south of Firestone Boulevard have a slightly higher proportion (20 to 40 percent) of children living in female -headed households.

Income Level
According to U.S. Census 2018 5-year estimates, the median household income for Downey was $71,948; compared with the County of Los Angeles median household income of $64,251, the median income inDowney was 1Zpercent higher. Median household income differs bytenure; while renter - occupied medianhouseho|dincomein2U3Uwas$S4,77O,theow/ner-occupiedmedianhouseho|d income was almost twice that at$92,l79. Census data also estimates that in Downey, 9.9 percent of residents live inpoverty, osdefined byfederal guidelines.

Figure 3.5 shows median household income by Census block group and Figure 3.6 shows poverty status byCensus tract. |nDowney, the highest median household incomes are located north nfFirestone Boulevard. The lowest incomes are in areas of the city north and south of Florence Avenue and in the southwest corner of the City in and around the Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center and Medical Center. Downey has a lower proportion of residents living in poverty compared with the surrounding region. In all areas of the City the percent of residents with incomes under the poverty level is less than 20 percent. Areas of the City between Paramount and Lakewood Boulevards and the area in and around Downey Landing have a slightly higher percentage of residents with incomes under the

poverty level (10 to 20 percent). There is no major concentration of residents living in poverty in Identifying low or moderate -income (LIVII) geographic areas and individuals is important to overcome patterns of segregation. HUD defines an LIVII area as a Census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI (based on HUD income definition of up to 80 percent of the AMI).

Figure 3.5 shows the Lower and Moderate Income (LIVII) areas in Downey by Census block group.

Atthe County level, the latest iteration ofthis data from the 2Ul1-2015American Community Survey (ACS) shows 5,526,154 low- and moderate -income residents in Los Angeles County against a population of9,863,O25.This yields olow- and moderate -income percentage of56.D3percent countywide. |nother words, 56.3 percent of people living in Los Angeles County are members of households earning less than 80 percent of Area Median Income. Though significant, this percentage is similar to the broader geographical region. Neighboring Orange [munt\/spercentage was 4926; San Bernardino, 43J9;and San Die0n,47.7U. Much ofLos Angeles County has high proportions ofLK8| areas particularly in Southeast and Central Los Angeles and the San Gabriel Valley. Downey has a similar low- and moderate - income percentage of 50.76 percent. Within the City, LMI areas are in most areas of the City south of Firestone Boulevard.

In Downey, local and regional data for segregation and integration by income show that:
m The highest median household incomes are located north of Florence Avenue that borders 1-5 and the City ufPico Rivera.
°* Downey has a low- and moderate -income percentage of 50.76 percent, similar to countywide percentage and higher than surrounding counties.
• A concentration of lower -income households exists in the areas of the City south of Firestone Boulevard. These areas also have a higher proportion of renters and households experiencing housing cost burdens.

RociallylEthnically Concentrated Areas ofPoverty
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines a Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Area of Poverty (R/ECAP) as a census tract where: (1) the non -white population comprises 50 percent or more of the total population and (2), the percentage of individuals living in households with incomes below the poverty rate is either (a) 40 percent or above ur(b)three times the average poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever is lower. The Al does not address R/ECAPs due to their absence within City boundaries which is confirmed by data in the HCD AFFH Data Viewer. |nLos Angeles County, there are R/ECAPsconcentrated around the central parts ofthe City ofLos Angeles, with a few scattered in San Fernando, San Gabriel, and Antelope Valleys. While there are no R/ECAPsinthe City, Figure llshows that most ofthe Cit/sblock groups show anon-white population that is 60 percent or greater and is predominantly composed of a Hispanic population. As mentioned earlier, Hispanics have a prominence value of 40 percent or greater in the City, however, the areas where the prominence value exceeds 50 percent are largely located south of Firestone Boulevard. These areas coincide with LKH|areos, lower median income areas and renters.

RaciallylEthnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence
Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs), they are generally understood to be neighborhoods in which there are both high concentrations of non -Hispanic White households and high household income rates. As mentioned previously, there are no concentrations of non -Hispanic White

residents in Downey. The City has a similar racial demographic makeup as the surrounding region.

Downey is in an area of the Country with no concentrations of non -Hispanic White residents. In 3,:j.i,mTaW *ifg,�m-iwttedian household incomes are located north of Firestone Boulevard. These areas it- -
do not have any concentration of non -Hispanic White residents.

Compared with Los Angeles County, the City has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents and a low'i percentage of white, non -Hispanic residents. As a result, Downey has fewer concentrations of White residents. A regional comparison shows that Downey has fewer areas with predominantly White residents compared with the surrounding area and the County. There is no Census tract with predominance values for the White population.

Percent of Total Non -White Population Base Map features SEEM :5 20% —•—•— City Boundary
,n r 21 -40% Water
41 -60% Open Space
_. 61 - 80%
L �ti,\HNC > 81 %

Percent of Population with a Disability Base Map Features F--' A -C 10% City Boundary
ISE= 10% - 20% Water
MMMM 20%.30% Open Space
IWAIM 30% - 40%
> 40%

Percent of Children
Households 9
Base.:i Features
INUM 0' r
CityBoundary
1'
NORM Water
NMI} / '
kl'

Percent of Children in Female -Headed
Households (2019)
Base Map features
REM= 80%

Percent of Population with Incomes Below
the Poverty Level (2019)
40%
Base Map features
----- City Boundary
Water
Open Space

Opportunity Access
The City's Analysis of Impediments (AI) presents findings for seven opportunity indices: environmental health, low poverty index, school proficiency index, labor market index, transit index, low transportation index, and the job proximity index.
° The environmental health index summarizes potential exposure toharmful toxins ata neighborhood level. The higher the value, the better the environmental quality of a neighborhood. |nDowney across every category, including those results reported for communities below the federal poverty level, Downey scores are well below the regional averages. Downey shows low environmental index scores across the board, regardless of the race orincome ofthe individual.

The low poverty index captures poverty in a neighborhood or jurisdiction where the higher the scone, the lower the area's exposure to poverty. Downey's score for each category is either equal to, or well above, the re8ion's average. This represents a much lower exposure to poverty in the jurisdiction. Of note is the lesser exposure that Black and Hispanic residents have in the jurisdiction, as the City's score for those groups is well above the regional scores.

The school proficiency index uses test scores from fourth grade students todetermine whether neighborhoods have high'perfnrming, or low -performing, elementary schools. The higher the score, the higher the quality of elementary schools in the area. Compared to regional averages, the jurisdiction is performing in line with the region, with two exceptions for White and Asian and Pacific Islander residents, where the jurisdiction's scores are well below the regional average for those groups.
° The labor market index presents the general strength of human capital and labor market engagement in each area. The higher the score, the higher labor market engagement. Compared to the regional scores, Downey is, on average, performing slightly above the expected labor market engagement with two exceptions: for White and Asian and Pacific Islander residents, where the jurisdiction's scores are well below the regional average for those groups. � The transit index is based on estimates of transit trips taken by a family. The higher the score, the more likely residents are to utilize public transportation. For this index, the jurisdiction is performing similar to the region for this index. More importantly, use of transit is relatively consistent across each racial group, suggesting that there does not exist a racial disparity in resident's reliance on, oruse of, public transit.
= The low transportation index isbased onestimates oftransportation expenses for afamily. The higher the score, the lower the transportation cost for anarea. Asinthe transit index, Downey is performing in line with the region. The high scores for both these indices suggests that residents are using the public transit available tothem, and it is relatively affordable. � The job proximity index quantifies the accessibility of a given residential neighborhood as a function of its distance to all job locations within the region, with larger employment centers weighted more heavily. The higher the score, the better access to employment opportunities is for a given area. For every racial category, Downey is slightly performing above the regional

The discussion below addresses opportunity access in more depth regarding education, environmental, transportation, and economic scores.

Education
Information on schools in the Downey Unified School District (from publicschoolreview.com) show that the district's average testing ranking is 7/10, which is in the top 50 percent of public schools in California and is ranked within the top 50 percent of all 989 school districts in California (based on combined math and reading proficiency testing data) for the 2018-2019 school year. School ranking had no significant variation by location. A comparison of schools in the Downey Unified School District on publicschoolreview.com shows that a few low -scoring K-12 schools overlap with areas classified as moderate resource (rank of 6/10 or 5/10). The schools include Gauldin Elementary School and Warren High School. A majority of Downey is considered highest resource and as such many top scoring schools are located throughout the City.

Environmental Justice
The California Office nfEnvironmental Health Hazard Assessment (3EHHA) developed a screening methodology to help identify California communities disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution called the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviro Screen).

In addition to environmental factors (pollutant exposure, groundwater threats, toxic sites, and hazardous materials exposure) and sensitive receptors (seniors, children, persons with asthma, and low birth weight infants), [a|EnviroScreen also takes into consideration socioeconomic factors. These factors include educational attainment, linguistic isolation, poverty, and unemployment. Research has shown a heightened vulnerability of people of certain ethnicities and lower socioeconomic status to environmental pollutants. Figure 3.11shows [a|EnvinoScreen 3.0results for Downey. |ngeneral, Downey has lower CalEnviro Screen scores than most areas to the west and north of the City. Within the City, several areas have higher scores. The area south of Firestone Boulevard and east of Lakewood Boulevard shows a concentration of tracts with higher CalEnviro Screen scores. This area of the City has long been developed with industrial uses and is slowly transitioning to commercial and residential uses.

A second concentration is found west of Paramount Boulevard (between Florence Avenue and Firestone Boulevard). The highest CalEnviro Screen scores are in the southeast corner of the City in an area bisected by 1-105. The areas with the highest CalEnviro Screen scores coincide with the designation of Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) consistent with S13 535. DACs are defined as the top 25 percent scoring areas from [m|EnvinoSoreen. Compared tothe County, Downey had similar scores toareas located in the central and eastern parts of the County. The lowest scoring areas are concentrated along the coast, the Santa Monica and San Gabriel Mountains, and parts of the Antelope Valley.

Transportation
Los Angeles County residents in urban and suburban areas generally enjoy superior access to transportation infrastructure. The County is also traversed by numerous major freeways within its boundaries (including Interstate 5, 10, 710, 605 all of which are either in close proximity or intersect with Downey). Proximity to these highways allows access to employment and other activity centers in Downtown Los Angeles, San Gabriel, West Los Angeles, and Orange County. 3-40 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

Additionally, the City scored 6.9inthe AJlTr nshPerfonmance3core([enterforNei8hbodhood Technology 2O19,A|lTr nsit,a|ltrensitznt.uqg)indicadn0that the City had amoderate combination oJ trips per week and number of jobs accessible enabling a negligible number of people to take transit to work. The City's score was similar to the County score of 6.8. AliTransit data also shows that in Downey,

99.9 percent of workers live within Yz mile of transit compared with 90.1 percent for the County.

Downey has access to eight major bus routes provided by LA Metro and is in close proximity to Metro's Lakewood Station, which is a light rail station along the Green Line. LA Metro is also in the planning process for anew light rail service, known as the West Santa Ana Branch, which isplanned tohave a station on Gardendale Street (southwest area of the City) and a connection point at the Green Line Lakewood Station.

Employment/Economic
Local economic characteristics impact local housing needs, even though these characteristics may not be directly related tnfair housing. These economic characteristics include the types of jobs available within the municipality, the way residents access jobs (e.g., auto, transit, etc.), the types of occupations held by residents, and their household income. The Al shows that Downey's top ten employers are primarily in the medical, education, and retail sector. Residents who work within Downey are primarily employed in educational services, health care and social assistance, retail trade, and manufacturing. This is consistent with the major employers in the City of Downey. Major employers in the City include Kaiser Permanente with 4,500 employees, Stonewood Center with 2,100 employees, Downey Unified School District with 1,851 employees, and Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center with 1,410 employees.

Approximately half of the top ten employers in Downey are in the medical sector. Employment characteristics are important axthey have a direct relationship with income. In 2018,those employed in educational services, health care and social assistance fields earned a median income that is 6.5 percent greater than the median income inDowney. However, the median income earned byretail trade employees was 27.7 percent lower than the median income for Downey residents.

In terms of unemployment, October 2021 unemployment data from the State Employment Development Department reported that Los Angeles County had an unemployment rate of 9.4 percent while the State of California had an unemployment rate of 6.4 percent. Downey had a lower level of unemployment (7.7 percent) among most cities in southeast Los Angeles County; Lynwood (9.3 peroent),South Gate (8.4percent),Pico Rivera (82 percent), Bell Gardens (8.4percent),and Paramount (9.0 percent). Unemployment in Downey was higher than southeast cities such as Cudahy (6.7 percent), and Santa Fe Springs (4.6 percent).

HCD and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAQ coordinated efforts to produce opportunity maps that evaluate specific economic, environmental, and educational characteristics that have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low- incometami|ies.TheTCA[/HCDOppnrtunityMapsaneintendedtodisp|aytbeareasthatofferlow- income children and adults the best chance at economic advancement, high educational attainment, and good physical and mental health. The primary function of TCAC is to oversee the Low-income Housing Tax Credit (L\HTC) Program, which provides funding 10 developers ofaffordable rental housing.

The opportunity maps play a critical role in shaping the future distribution of affordable housing in areas with the highest opportunity.

Shown onFigure 3.7,most T[A[opportunity areas inDowney are inthe highest ormoderate resources category. Most of the areas of the City north of Firestone Boulevard are identified as high resources areas. South of Firestone Boulevard, there is a mix ofhigh and moderate resources areas. The City has more high resources areas than neighboring jurisdictions and no low resources areas which is the dominant classification for cities located west of Downey. One area is designated as Moderate Resources (Rapidly Changing) and is located on the southeastern part of the City, adjacent to the eastern City boundary and south of Firestone Boulevard. This area is predominately developed with industrial uses, although a few residential sites identified to be rezoned are located here. These areas have index scores just below the "High Resource" threshold and have experienced rapid increases in opportunity since2O0O.

Disproportionate Need
Disproportionate housing need generally refers to a condition in which there are significant disparities in certain groups of residents experiencing a category of housing need when compared to the total population experiencing that category of housing need in the applicable geographic area. The disproportionate housing need analysis looks at cost burden, overcrowding, and environmental justice.

Cost Burden (Overpoyment)
State and federal standards specify that households spending more than 30 percent of gross annual income on housing they are overpaying (or experience a housing cost burden). When a household spends more than 30 percent of its income on housing costs, it has less disposable income for other necessities such as health care. In Downey, 43.7 percent of households are overpaying for housing.

Overpayment varies by tenure and income. Citywide, 36.2 percent of owner -occupied households are overpaying for housing compared with more than half (51 percent) of renter -occupied households.

The A|identifies disproportionate need related tohousing cost burden (spending over 3Opercent income on housing). Except for Native American households, Downey has a lower costburden inthe region for every ethnic group and household type. For Native American households, the proportion experiencing severe housing cost burdens is 10 percent above that of all households in the region which experience severe rent burden. American Indian and Alaska Native residents make up 0.1 percent of the Downey population.

Figures 3.8 and 3.9 show housing overpayment for homeowners and for renters. In general, overpayment ismore prevalent for renter households. Figure 3,8shows that inmost areas ofthe City 40 to 60 percent of homeowners are overpaying for housing. These areas are located throughout the City, but a noticeable concentration is visible north of Firestone Boulevard. Figure 3.9 shows that in some areas of the City 60 to 80 percent of renter households are overpaying for housing. These areas are mostly located south of Imperial Highway and in the northern area of the City bounded by Florence Avenue, Tweedy Lan, Gallatin Road and Lakewood Boulevard.

TCAC Opportunity Areas (2021) Composite Score
Highest Resource
High Resource
Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing)
Lod Resource
High Segregation & Poverty
Missing/Insufficient Data
Base Map Features
— --- City Boundary
Water
Open Space

Overcrowding and Substandard Housing
Overcrowding of residential units, in which there is more than one person per room, can be a potential indicator that households are experiencing economic hardship and are struggling toafford housing. |n Downey, 11.8 percent of housing units are overcrowded. Overcrowding is more prevalent in rental units (17.1 percent) than owner -occupied units (6.6 percent). In contrast to the level of overcrowding in the City, cities to the west of Downey (Bell Gardens, South Gate, Lynwood, Bell, and Huntington Park) show that there are significantly more tracts with overcrowding levels higher than the State average. Odes east of Downey (Whittier, Santa Fe Springs, La Mirada, and Hacienda Heights), show few tracts with overcrowding levels higher than the State average. The Census Tracts with overcrowding higher than the state average is in the area south of Firestone Boulevard and overlaps with higher levels of overpayments (Figures 3.8and 3.9),lower incomes (Figure I5),and renters (Figure I13).

The Downey A]shows that more than half ofDowney households, 53percent, experience housing problems which include lack ofaccess tokitchen orplumbing facilities, overcrowding, and housing cost burden. Among those households experiencing problems, 33 percent of the total experience severe housing problems. These percentages are almost identical to the regional average. Additionally, as is true in the region, Hispanic households in Downey experience housing problems and severe housing problems at higher rates than the average. Another group experiencing significantly larger housing problems are Native American residents. In Downey, all Native American residents (100 percent of residents inthis group) experience problems.

Asshown unFigure E.10,overcrowding bmost prevalent inareas ofthe City south ofFirestone Boulevard. Based upon observations and experiences ofthe Code Enforcement Division, the City estimates that in 2020, fewer than 25 housing units were in severe need of replacement or substantial rehabilitation due to housing conditions. These units, for example, may be suffering from neglect and building that appears structurally unsound and maintenance is non-existent. This does not include homes orstructures that need more traditional rehabilitation such as repairs to maintain a safe and healthy living environment. HUD [HASdata (%U14'J018)provides anestimate ofhouseholds with at least one offour housing problems (incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than one person per room, or cost burden greater than 30 percent). In Downey, 48.6 percent of households reported one of these housing problems, a level lower than Los Angeles County (51 percent) and slightly higher than the state (44.3 percent).

Environmental Justice
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (bEHHA) developed a screening methodology to help identify California communities disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution called the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviro Screen).

In addition to environmental factors (pollutant exposure, groundwater threats, toxic sites, and hazardous materials exposure) and sensitive receptors (seniors, children, persons with asthma, and low birth weight infants), CalEnviro Screen also takes into consideration socioeconomic factors. These factors include educational attainment, linguistic isolation, poverty, and unemployment. Research has shown a heightened vulnerability of people of certain ethnicities and lower socioeconomic status to environmental pollutants. Figure 3'lIshows [a|EnvinxScreen 3.0results for Downey. |ngeneral, Downey has lower CalEnviro Screen scores than most areas to the west and north of the City. Within the City, several areas have higher scores. The area south of Firestone Boulevard and east of Lakewood

Percent of Owner Households (with Mortgages)
Spending >30% Income on Housing Costs Base Map features c 20% — —_— City Boundary
20% - 40% Water
40% - 60.% Open Space
EMMM 60% - 80%
MMMM > 80%

Percent of Overcrowded Households
(>1.0 persons per room)
Base Map Features
( 20%

��,� ti . 0a

Boulevard shows a concentration of tracts with higher CalEnviro Screen scores. This area of the City has long been developed with industrial uses and is slowly transitioning to commercial and residential uses.

A second concentration is found west of Paramount Boulevard (between Florence Avenue and Firestone Boulevard). The highest CallEnviro Screen scores are in the southeast scorner of the City in an area bisected by 1-105. The areas with the highest CalEnviro Screen scores coincide with the designation of Disadvantaged Communities (DAC) consistent with SB 535. DACs are defined as the top 25 percent scoring areas from [a|EnviroScreen.

Displacement Risk
Displacement refers to instances where a household is forced or pressured to move from their home against their wishes. Areas with high demand for homes drive up housing costs and increase pressure for redevelopment, resulting in the potential for displacement. The displacement risk in Downey can be evaluated based on physical and economic displacement.

The HCD AFFH viewer identifies communities, or places where residents may be particularly vulnerable to displacement in the context of rising property values. The central areas of Los Angeles County, including parts ofthe San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys are vulnerable tudisplacement. The areas vulnerable to displacement in Downey are mostly located in the downtown area and areas just south of downtown. The vulnerability, according to the data is based on the higher proportion of persons of color and lower income and renter households and observed rent increases.

Physical Displacement
Physical displacement isthe result ofeviction, acquisition, rehabilitation, ordemolition ufproperty; the expiration of covenants on rent- or income -restricted housing; or the rising cost of housing. Tenure and displacement are closely tied as renters are at higher risk of displacement from rising rental prices.

The tenure distribution in Downey is nearly split equally. Owner -occupied households constitute 50.6 percent of all households in 2020, while households that are renter occupied constitute 49.4 percent of all households. Figure 3.12 shows areas with higher proportion of households in renter -occupied housing units. Several areas of the City are susceptible to displacement because of the high proportion of households that are renters and lower income. In the central areas of the City there are five Census tracts where renter households make up more than 60 percent of all households. In two of these tracts, renter households make up more than 80 percent of all households. One tract is located north of Firestone Boulevard, and it includes the Civic Center, Downey High School, and part of the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area. The second tract is in the eastern part of the City south of Firestone Boulevard. This area has many industrial uses and multi -family residential properties. The City has a Residential Anti -Displacement Policy to comply with the requirements of Section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of1874with respect 10the prevention and minimization of residential displacement because ofthe expenditure ofHUD assistance.

Displacement can also occur form the loss of affordable housing. Housing law requires an inventory and analysis of govern ment-assisted dwelling units eligible for conversion from lower -income housing to market rate housing during the next 10 years. Reasons for this conversion may include expiration of subsidies, mort0aAepre'paymentsorpay'offs,andconcurrentexpimtionofaffoujabiUtyrestrictions.

Based on City records and information from the California Housing Partnership Corporation and City records, in the next 10 years (2021-2031) no assisted units have expiring affordability covenant.

Also, it is possible for local government policies to result in the displacement oraffect representation of minorities orpersons living with adisability. Currently, most ofthe cities with adopted reasonable accommodations procedures have a definition of a disabled person in their zoning ordinances. The City of Downey is in the process of creating a reasonable accommodation ordinance, to be completed by the end2821.

Economic Displacement
Economic displacement is due to the inability to afford rising rents or costs of homeownership like property taxes. Fi0urel1] shows HUD's Location Affordability Index, which provides standardized housing and transportation costs by state. Most of Downey has a median gross rent of$1,5OO. Recent census data show that the median rent in Downey among all apartment units in 2019 was $1,462 per month. Real estate w/ebskeshovv higher rental costs including Costar which shows an average nenbt pof $2,025 for a two -bedroom apartment. HUD -determined fair market rents for Los Angeles County fall within the range ofthe rents within Downey, indicating that rental rates inDowney generally align with the HUD -defined fair market rents although that can be changing due to the escalating rents in the region. In Downey, the areas with the highest rents du not coincide with areas with a high proportion of renter households. There are only four census tracts north of Firestone Boulevard with median gross rents of$%,0OO.However, Figure l0shows that the areas south ofImperial Highway have high proportions of overpaying renters. This area generally coincides with higher levels of overcrowding and lower income households.

Regionally, areas incentral Los Angeles County have lower median gross rents as indicated by the Location Affordability Index, than areas inWest Los Angeles, the South Bay, afew cities inthe northern San Gabriel Valley, and western San Fernando Valley. In terms of housing overpayment, most of Los Angeles County renters and homeowners are experiencing significant housing cost burdens. This could create regional economic pressure in the City of Downey and further decrease the availability of affordable housing as residents in Los Angeles County actively seek areas with lower median rents.

Disproportionate Need and Displacement Issues
The Disproportionate Need and Displacement analysis reveals that areas of the City located south of Firestone Boulevard have disproportionate needs and higher vulnerability to displacement. The areas of the City south ofFirestone Boulevard have higher levels of:
• Renter households experiencing housing cost burden
• Overcrowding
• Households with lower median incomes
• Pollution burdens
State law requires that for housing elements due on or after January 1, 2021, sites must be identified throughout the community in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing opportunities (Government Code Section 65583(c)(10)). Affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity. For purposes of the Housing Element site inventory, this means that sites identified to accommodate the lower- incomeneedarenotconcentratedin|ow+resnuroedaneas(forexamp|e,|aokofmmcesstohigh

performing schools, proximity to jobs, location disproportionately exposed to pollution or other health impacts) or areas of segregation and concentrations of poverty.

HCD and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCA[) coordinated efforts to produce opportunity maps that evaluate specific economic, environmental, and educational characteristics that have been shown by research to support positive economic, educational, and health outcomes for low- incometami|ies.ShownonFigume3.14,mos T[ACopportunity areas inDowney are inthe highest or moderate resources category. Figure 3.14also shows that most planned housing sites are located within areas designated as Highest Opportunity. Half of the capacity on sites identified within the Downtown Downey Specific Plan are sites in a Highest Resources area, and the other half is in a Moderate Resources area. The area designated as Moderate Resources (Rapidly Changing) located on the southeastern part of the City, adjacent to the eastern City boundary and south of Firestone Boulevard, is predominately developed with industrial uses, although a few residential sites identified to be rezoned are|uca1edhere.Theoemreashaveindexsconesjustbe|owthe"Hi0hResource"thnesho|dandhave experienced rapid increases inopportunity since 2OOO. The Moderate Resources area has industrial and medical uses which may affect the area's designation. For the three commercial center sites, more than half of the identified capacity is in a Highest Resources area. Most commercial corridor sites are also in a Highest Resources area.

Racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) are HUD -designated Census tracts with relatively high concentrations of non -white residents living in poverty. There are no R/ECAPs within the City ofDowney.

The AFFH analysis also shows areas of the City located south of Firestone Boulevard have disproportionate needs and higher vulnerability to displacement. The areas of the City south of Firestone Boulevard have higher levels of:
• Renter households experiencing housing cost burden
• Overcrowding
• Households with lower median incomes
• Pollution burdens
One strategy to address the lack of affordable housing in the City is to increase high density, residential capacity throughout the City. As part of this strategy the City is adding residential uses (at a minimum density of 30 units per acre) along the City's major corridors and at the City's major commercial centers.

A significant proportion of that new capacity is south of Firestone Boulevard. Because the strategy adds nesidenda|capac|tytonon'residenda|areas,itisaddressinAthearea'sdispruportiunateneedwithnut the risk of displacement of residents improves fair housing and equal opportunity conditions.

The distribution of identified sites also improves fair housing and equal opportunity conditions in Downey because almost all sites lie within Moderate to Highest Resources areas. This is positive considering that these sites today do not support residential uses but represent locations where new higher -density housing can be provided and residents will have access to good schools, diverse jobs, and distant from industrial uses —and not concentrated in existing low poverty areas. The sites inventory also improves fair housing conditions through the future adoption of a residential overlay along some of the City's major corridors. This new overlay will expand new housing opportunities in all parts of the City and not inany concentrated areas.

Median Gross Rents
Base Map Features
a $1,000
— — — City Boundary
„} <$1,500
Water
<$2,000
Open Space
<$2,500
<$3,000
Greater than $3,000

TCAC Opportunity Areas 2021 2021-2029 Sites Inventory
IRENE=' Highest Resource Approved Propoed'Projects (Credits) Sites To Be Rezoned High Resource i Approved or Proposed Projects NNINM MDRIR3 Sites to Rezone k .,,. . Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing) Suter Currently an PlaceW1111M LDR/R1 Rezone to MDR/R3 Moderate; Resource MIMI= Mixed -Use Sites to Rezone
Vacant and Underutilized R1
Lour Resource Commercial Specific Plan Sites to Rezone
High Segregation "overt vacant and UnderutiuFed R2 Residential Overlay Sites Miss in tlrlsaaflic3ent Data VENOM Downtown Downey SIP Sites g Residential Overlay Zone

Public Outreach
Aspart ufthe Housing Element update, the City ofDowney proactively engaged the community through avariety of avenues including digital/social media outreach, acommunity survey, aoummunity workshop, and direct email to stakeholder groups. The results of the workshop and survey findings relevant tothe AFFHanalysis include:
0 Housing Cost is an issue to many residents:
o One in four respondents (27.5%) said they struggled to pay their rent or mortgage since the oonmnavinusoutbreak.
n Some of the most important housing challenges to respondents included ensuring that children who grow up in Downey can afford to live in the City on their own; encouraging rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods; supporting homeowners at risk of mortgage default tokeeptheirhomes;andtar0etin0effortstoaddress|ong-terminequhies in the housing market, including discrimination in renting.

Residents expressed an interest in expanding the availability of affordable, multi -family housing and support for lower income, rent burdened households:
o Residents would like to see new housing in areas with the least impact on traffic and that new housing should bespread evenly across all parts nfthe City. o Residents support tiny home development tohelp alleviate homelessness n Residents support exploring how rezoning might encourage more affordable developments o Residents would like that the City ensure long-term affordability covenants on housing Historic Patterns q/Development
When Downey was founded in 1873 (as a community not yet a city), much of the City's development patterns were determined by the expansion of the Union Pacific Railroad and development initially proceeded slowly. Economic growth in the 1950s and 1960s (following incorporation) led to an explosion in population growth leading Downey to be one of the first suburban "planned communities" with quality homes, schools, and retail centers. The City has only continued to grow since then and its built -out nature has reduced the availability of vacant land causing land and housing prices to increase.

The Disproportionate Need and Displacement analysis shows the need for more housing as there are several pockets of the city (downtown and south of Firestone Boulevard) that have high rates of overcrowding, housing overpayment, and housing burdens that overlap with areas of lower incomes and high proportions of renters. Some of these areas, such as the downtown, also overlap with historic patterns of redlining.

The City has worked to address issues with housing affordability and capacity by:
* Proactively addressing most immediate housing needs brought onby00D-19 by providing emergency rental assistance grants to income -eligible households in Downey that have been economically impacted by[OV|D'18through job loss, furlough, orreduction inhours orpay. * Significantly increasing high -density, residential capacity throughout the City by:
o Adopting General Plan and Zoning Code amendments to increase the allowable residential density inthe Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation and the R'3zone.
o Adopting implementing zone and development standards for the Mixed -Use

General Plan designation that will allow residential development ataminimum of 3Ounits per acre.
o Adopting aresidential overlay zone that will allow high -density housing development ataminimum density of30units per acre along key corridors. o Adding aresidential component tothree commercial specific plans, requiring a minimum density of3Ounits per acre. The residential component will be implemented by a residential or mixed -use overlay or by amending or rescinding the governing specific plans.
o Encouraging the development ofaccessory dwelling units (ADUs)through a facilitated and streamlined process.

The 2020 Analysis of Impediments (AI) did not identify any actions, omissions, or decisions by the City of Downey which restrict or|imit the housing choices ofresidents inDowney unthe basis nftheir age, race, color, ancestry, national origin, age, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor. The Al identified four recommendations to improve fair housing choice in Downey.

1. Explore the development and rehabilitation of affordable housing opportunities with local partners aswell asoutside developers.

2. Promote the construction of affordable for -sale and/or rental housing units with three or more bedrooms that are affordable to very low- and low-income families. The City shall publicize financial and regulatory incentive opportunities (e.g., expediting permit processing, deferred fees, density bonuses, or use of Housing Asset Funds) to developers for these unit types.

I Actively seek replacement funding sources torecover lost funding (e1g.,Redevelopment Agency dissolution, reduction in CDBG allocation, etc.) to continue facilitating affordable housing.

4. Direct the Fair Housing Foundation to provide information on reasonable accommodation to City residents through dissemination of written materials available at City Hall and appropriate community centers. Continue funding a fair housing program that encompasses investigations of discrimination complaints, research of housing related discrimination issues and public education and information.

Identification and Prioritization of Local Fair Housing Issues and Contributing Factors Housing Element law requires that the City list and prioritize contributing factors to fair housing issues.

Contributing factors create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, are fundamental to adequate goals and actions, and must be related to the overall analysis. This identification and prioritization must give highest priority to factors that limit or deny fair housing choice or access to opportunity or negatively impact fair housing. The following are contributing factors that affect fair housing choice in Downey.
1' Displacement risk due ¢oregional economic pressure
Areas with high demand for homes drive up housing costs and increase pressure for redevelopment, resulting inthe potential for displacement. Inadequate supply and production ofaffordable homes

available to low-income households and persons in protected classes as well as public opposition to new development are contributing factors tothis fair housing issue.

Contributing factors:
w Inadequate supply/production ofaffordable/special needs housing • Displacement ofresidents due tnregional economic pressures • High land and development costs inthe region
• Land use and zoning laws
• Public opposition tonew development and land use and zoning laws

2. Disproportionate housing needs in areas with lower incomes and higher proportions of renters The analysis found that areas south of Firestone Boulevard had higher levels of overcrowding and overpayment that overlapped with lower median incomes and higher proportions of renters.

Contributing factors:
• Inadequate supply/production ofaffordable/special needs housing • Displacement ofresidents due toregional economic pressures w Median gross rents lower than some more expensive areas of the region, such as West Los Angeles and the South Bay
• Location ofenvironmental health hazards
The City is taking several actions (reflected in the Housing Plan) to address these two contributing factors tofair housing issues and affirmatively further fair housing throughout the city. The main strategy to address displacements risk is to expand the opportunity for the development of housing for a variety ofincome levels through:
• General Plan and Zoning Code amendments toincrease the allowable residential density inthe Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation and R-3 zone from 18-24 units per acre to 18'40 units per acre
• Adoption of an implementing zone and development standards for the Mixed -Use General Plan designation that will allow residential development at a density of at least 30 units per acre • Adoption of a residential overlay zone that will allow high -density housing development at a density of at least 30 units per acre along key City corridors and allows residential development as by'ri0htuse
m Adding a residential component to three key specific plan areas with densities of at least 30 units per acre. The residential component will be implemented by a residential or mixed -use overlay orbyamending orrescinding the governing specific plans. • Review and, if needed, revise residential developments standards that may constrain housing development including minimum lot area requirements and building height limits in the R-3 zoning district and minimum unit sizes for all residential development. • Facilitating and encouraging ADUdevelopment
= Exploring the potential for adoption ofanindusionaryhousing ordinance • Educating the community on the importance of equitable access for all residents and neighborhoods toaffordable housing and financial support • Creating and convening the Ad Hoc Committee for Affordable Housing to discuss housing affordability issues in Downey, explore concepts such as inclusionary housing and serve as an ongoing space for residents to share concerns and ideas related to affordable housing in the City • Prioritizing community and stakeholder engagement during controversial development decisions.

Environmental hazards like geologic and seismic conditions provide the greatest threat tuthe built environment. The City has identified areas where land development should be carefully controlled. The following hazards may impact future development of residential units in the City.

Asstated inthe General Plan Safety Element, the entire City —as well asmost ofSouthern California —is located within a seismically active region that has been subject to major earthquakes in the past. While no known faults traverse Downey, the Whittier fault is approximately five miles away, and may generate an earthquake of maximum magnitude in the range of 6.0 to 7.2. .7 The greatest damage from earthquakes results from ground shaking. Although intense ground shaking is generally most severe near quake epicenter, properties such as those in Downey not immediately adjacent tuthe epicenter may be subject to extreme damage due to liquefaction, a condition related to the area's silt and sandy soils and relatively high water table. The greatest potential danger is the collapse of older residential units constructed from unreinforced masonry and explosions ufpetroleum and fuel lines. The State Division of Mines and Geology has designated the entire City as a liquefaction zone; the City requires geotechnical reports for construction projects to identify and mitigate the potential undermining of structural integrity during earthquakes.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) publishes maps that identify areas of Downey subject to flooding in the event of a major storm. These Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) indicate areas that may be inundated in the event of a 100-year or a 500-year storm. Since the Army Corp of Engineers completed raising the channel levees in2Q0O noproperties within Downey are considered by FEMA to be within a 100-year flood zone (a flood of such intensity that it has a one percent chance of occurring in any given year). Areas that are designated for future residential development do not fall within the 100-year floodplain and are not subject to specialized flood construction requirements.

Building and structure fires are the most serious fire threats within the City. Like most Southern California cities on the urban fringe, the late summer fires that result from the accumulation of dried underbrush have the potential to spread into the City proper. But since the City of Downey is largely deve|opedandnutad]acenttoanybrush'uoveredareas,Dovvneyhasa|h1|epntentia|furthesetypesof fires. Other fire hazards within the City may be associated with heavy industrial uses, older commercial and residential structures, the presence of hazardous materials, and arson.

Noise generated from mobile sources such as traffic and aircraft will continue to have the greatest potential impact on land use in Downey. The amount of noise generated by aircraft traffic is significant since the City lies under the fight path to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). Also, |nterstates5, 105,and 6Q5all cross through portions wfthe City and carry high daily traffic volumes that create ' According to the Southern California Earthquake Data Center

MMAT—TTW - 6 - - -
- 11MUNWO MIT-WrErl, M-M
dLC 111611 IC:'Clb 11 1141bC III LFIC ItIcIIIIIIII6
and policies to help reduce the effects, if not the actual intensity, of noise experienced by Downey residents. Land use policy discourages the placement of noise -sensitive land uses in areas that are subject to high noise levels.

This page left intentionally blank.

This chapter describes the land, financial, and administrative resources available in the City of Downey to address its existing and future housing needs, including its share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Government Code Section 65583(a) requires local governments to prepare an inventory of land suitable for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having the potential for redevelopment. The inventory of land suitable for residential development shall be use'L financial and administrative resources available to support affordable housing.

Demand for housing inDowney, and all Southern California ingeneral, has significantly increased over the past decade due to slow housing production. The City has worked to encourage housing development but is constrained, as are other urbanized jurisdictions, by lack of undeveloped (vacant) land, high land prices, open space deficits, and productive industrial uses that create land use conflicts if too close to residential neighborhoods. Factors such as major freeways and rail corridors further limit development potential, as adequate buffers around those locations are needed to create suitable living environments.

All the while, the cost of developing subsidized affordable housing has increased while public funding has decreased. According to a study produced by the Terner Center at LIC Berkeley, across the United States, the high costs of developing subsidized housing hinders efforts to address the affordability crisis of low- and moderate -income families and provide homes for unhoused individuals. The number of people overpaying for housing remains at historically high levels, and after many years of decline, homelessness has been on the rise in California. Levels of public subsidy for housing have not kept pace with these growing needs. At the same time, higher costs per unit to build affordable housing means that states and localities produce fewer units with the same amount of subsidy, even as more people need these unitsz. Many of the factors that have influenced housing affordability and availability were intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. The rise in cost of building materials, the skyrocketing demand zTemerCenter Strategies VnLower Cost and Speed Housing Production: ACase Study ofSan Francisco's 833

for more affordable housing, and the increase in persons struggling to afford housing costs have exacerbated analready serious situation.
|nresponse tothese circumstances, the City ofDowney has been proactive inaddressing most immediate housing needs brought on by COVID-19, such as disseminating information on local and regional assistance programs, including the City's own COVID-19 Emergency Residential Rental Assistance Program. This program provides emergency rental assistance grants to income -eligible households in Downey that have been economically impacted by COVID-19 through job loss, furlough, orreduction inhours orpay. The City continues 1obecommitted tubeing part ofthe statewide process 10provide adequate housing, challenges notwithstanding.

This section of the Housing Element will show that SCAG assigned the City a goal of accommodating 6,525 housing units in various income categories from 2021 through 2029. To put that figure into perspective, the allocation is eight times higher than the 2014-2021 RHNA allocated to Downey (814 units) and amounts to more than 18 percent of the City's existing housing stock (2019) which has been developed over the course of more than 60 years. Accommodating the sixth cycle RHNA allocation in a built -out city like Downey within an eight -year period represents a formidable challenge. Nonetheless, the City has paired this housing resources section with an aggressive set ofpolicies and programs that will work to address the challenge. Knowing that the housing needs of Downey residents and their families have reached a critical pitch, the City will embark on many programmatic actions to expand the opportunities for new residential development citywide.

The City will:
• Undertake General Plan and Zoning Code amendments to increase the allowable residential density in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation and the R-3 zone. • Adopt implementing zone and development standards for the Mixed -Use General Plan designation that will allow residential development at a minimum of 30 units per acre. • Adopt a residential overlay zone that will allow high -density housing development at a minimum density of3Uunits per acre along key corridors.
• Add aresidential component tothree commercial specific plans, requiring aminimum density of 30 units per acre. The residential component will be implemented by a residential or mixed -use overlay orbyamending orrescinding the governing specific plans. • Encourage the development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) through a facilitated and streamlined process.

As a community approaching full build -out, the City has few remaining vacant sites. The relative scarcity of vacant land necessitates the use of alternative mechanisms for providing sites for housing. In addition, the City has fiscal challenges to maintaining service levels. One mechanism that can support economic development and housing is considering the use of City -owned or publicly owned land, such as parking lots, for development. The City will use a toolkit of housing incentives programs to facilitate the construction of affordable and market rate housing products including the use of Development Agreements to secure long-term fiscal and affordable housing benefits. The City will focus on development projects on City -owned property in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area and at the Downey Landing commercial center (See Program 2.3).

share of the regional housing need. HCD allocates a numeric regional housing goal to SCAG, and SCAG then mandated to distribute the numerical goal among the cities and counties in the region. This sharl for the SCAG region is known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The housing allocati targets are not building requirements; rather, they are planning goals for each community to accommodate through appropriate planning policies and land use regulations. Allocation targets are intended to ensure that zoning is in place and appropriately zoned sites are available to address anticipated housing demand during the Housing Element planning period. I The sixth cycle RHNA for the SCAG region covers an 8.3-year planning period (June 30, 2021 — October 15, 2029). To address a diversity of housing need, the RHNA is divided into four income categories: very �OM, LOW moderater and above moderate. As determined b�,, SCAG, the City of Downey's draft allocation is 6,525 new housing units during this planning cycle, with the units divided among the four income categories as shown in Table 4.1.

Total Units Needed 6,525 100%
Source: Southern California Association of Governments, 2021 mw|~Area Median Income
Note: Pursuant mAazsa4 local jurisdictions are also required toproject the housing needs ofextremely low-income households (*3nmAMV.mestimating the number of extremely low-income households, a )vn,dicuun ;an use so% of the very low- income allocation n,apportion the very low-income figure based vnCensus data.

Therefore, the oty',very low-income x*mAufz'o79 units can besplit into z'osp In Downey, projects credited towards the RHNA are shown in Table 4.2 and Figure 4.2 The Veterans Commons Project is being developed on land owned by the Los Angeles County units for chronically homeless veterans and veteran families. Veterans Commons will be a mixed -use and skill
building services. Residential amenities include a 1,500-square-foot resident center, four case management/resident services offices, and a veterans' memorial public art located at the corner of Gardendale Street and Garfield Avenue. Construction will begin construction in December 2021.

Table 4.2 also includes a 28-unit townhome development at 12850 Woodruff Avenue which includes two very low-income units provided through the density bonus provisions. The City has worked to assist the property developer in providing an affordable component by introducing the site developer to a developer with extensive experience in obtaining funding specifically for affordable housing of affordable units, the developer has indicated that this is their first project utilizing the density bonus provisions provided for in SB1818 and desire to move forth with a small project to gain experience.

I he remaining projects are credited toward the above moderate -income RHNA. In total, the approved/proposed projects will result in 193 units. After these projects are considered, the City has remaining RHNA of 6,332 units.

Approve
Veteran Commons Project
50 10361 Foster Rd. condominiums
12850 Woodruff Ave.
condominiums
10224 La Reina Ave. apartments
7224 Florence Avenue
Total
52 Consistent with HCD guidelines, the methodology for determining realistic capacity on each identified site must account for land use controls and site improvements. Due to the limited availability of residential land, many property owners and developers may opt for a density bonus to increase the unit count. Starting in 2021, residential projects in California with on -site affordable housing can get a density bonus ufuptoSOpercent. Previously, under Government Code Section 65915--common|y known as the Density Bonus Law —the maximum bonus was 35 percent. In Downey, affordable housing has been developed on smaller sites, and projects have been able to achieve densities higher than the allowed maximum. Specifically, the 50-unit Downey View affordable housing development was developed on a 0.52-acre property at a density of 96 units per acre in a district that allowed a maximum of 70 units per acre (Downtown Downey Specific Plan, District 5: Firestone Boulevard Gateway District) .

The following assumptions are consistent with current trends and considered realistic:
� Lower -density residential sites: Realistic capacity for sites in land use designations that allow 17

city and there are very few opportunities for development in lower density areas as such the assumption isthat due tothe high cost ofdeveloping housing, most developments atthese densities will reach maximums. There are very few sites identified at these densities and those sites only yield 108 units at an assumed affordability level of above moderate -income. m Higher -density residential sites (presented in the second part of this Chapter): Realistic capacity for sites in land use designations that allow a density of more than 17 units per acre is calculated at 80 percent maximum density based on recent trends and the assumption that development standards, combined with unique site features and shared amenities such as parking and open space, may not always lead to 100 percent buildout. This assumption is realistic and conservative as high -density development projects have been developed at much higher densities. This shows the demand for high density residential development is high and given the higher cost of development in the region, reaching maximum or near maximum densities is expected. In 2014 Downey View, a 50-unit, multi -family development was built on a 0.5-acre site at a density of 96 units per acre in a zone that accommodated densities of up to 75 units per acre. Higher building heights are available for projects within the Downtown Downey Specific Plan (DDSP) areas (45 to 75 feet) and several projects have been built at the established heights.

As part of the City's Housing Element implementation (Program 1.3), the City is increasing allowable density in the R-3 zone to allow up to 40 units per acre and in the process adjust development standards, accordingly. Program 1.3 also includes an action item to review and revise residential developments standards including building height limits in the R-3 zoning district. Recent project trends show that the density assumption is realistic. A smaller, 8-unit multi -family development was built in 2020 at 10341 Western Avenue on 0.34 acres and yielded a density 23.5 units per acre which is 97.5 percent of maximum allowed density at the time it was built. Four recent projects also show that calculating realistic capacity at 80 percent maximum density is realistic:
o 10341 Western Avenue (permitted in 2019): 8 units on 0.34 acres and a density of 23.5 units per acre in the R-3 zone (which allows a maximum density of 24 units per acre) n 10303/10221 Downey Avenue (approved in 2021): 12 units on 0.83 acres and a density of 14.5 units per acre in the R2 zone (which allows a maximum density of 17 units per acre)
o 7940Te|eQraph Road (completed in 2021): 39 condominiums on 1.6acres and a density of 24 units per acre in the R3 zone (which allows a maximum density of 24 units per acre)
n 9553 Firestone Boulevard (permitted in 2019): 24 townhomes on 1.1 acres and a density of 22 units per acre in the R3 zone (which allows a maximum density of 24 units per acre)
* Mixed -use and Residential Overlay sites (presented in the second part of this Chapter): To ensure that the realistic capacity for future mixed -use and residential overlay sites takes into consideradondeve|upmentufnon-residenda|useoformixed'usepnojects,suchascommerdm| uses, a minimum density of 30 units per acre is used to calculate capacity. As part of Housing Element implementation, the City will undertake a General Plan and Zoning Code amendments to add a mixed -use zone to implement the Mixed -Use General Plan land use designation and to create a residential overlay for some of the commercial corridors. Both will be implemented at a minimum density of 30 units per acre. The land use update process will include identifying appropriate maximum densities for mixed -use and residential development on commercial corridors. As such, no maximum densities are included in this analysis. This approach provides for a conservative estimate of development potential, as many of the identified mixed -use and commercial corridor sites can achieve significantly higher residential capacity. The realistic

capacity calculation using the minimum density also accounts for the development ofnon- residential usesastheoctua|adoptedmeuimumdensitiesvviUbehi0her. � Specific plan sites: Site capacity in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan is based on allowed uses and intensities. The assumptions presented here are realistic, asdevelopment inthe Downtown Downey Specific Plan have achieved densities of up to 96 units per acre for affordable housing developments. The 50-unit Downey View affordable housing development was developed on a

0.52-acre property at a density of 96 units per acre in a district that allowed a maximum of 70 units per acre (Downtown Downey Specific Plan, District 5: Firestone Boulevard Gateway District). The Heritage Court senior housing project included 31 units at a density of 49.6 units per acre (Downtown Downey Specific Plan, Distric1J: Downtown Residential District). To calculate residential capacity the following assumptions are made:
o District 1and 3(Z0to4Ounits per acre) Amedian density of30units per acre isused to calculate realistic capacity based on actual developed densities in newer developments and toaccount for development ufnon-residential uses. o District 2 (8 to 40 units per acre) - A typical density of 30 units per acre is used to calculate capacity based on actual developed densities in newer developments and to account for development ofnon-residential uses.
o District No sites in this district are included since residential uses are not allowed. o District S(40 to 75units peraoe)—Amediandensity of 58units per acre bused to calculate capacity based on actual developed densities in newer developments and to account for development ofnon-residential uses.
o The use of median densities in three of the Downtown Specific Plan districts accounts for the fact that while the Specific Plan allows 100 percent residential development and while densities atorabove the maximum allowed can beand have been achieved there is still the potential development of mixed -uses. The use of the lower densities reflects the potential lower yield of mixed -use development.
� Specific plan sites: Site capacity in the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan is based on the adopted capacity for the Plan which includes development of up to 700 units (including the Veterans Commons Project) atdensities of60to1OUunits per acre. Based onthe densities expected to be developed, the 600 units (exclusive of the Veterans Commons Project) can be credited toward the lower -income RHNA based on the provisions of State law allowing developments at "default densities" (at least 30 units per acre in Downey) to be counted as lower -income sites. Nonetheless, recognizing that a variety of housing types and prices may be developed on the campus, the unit count is distributed more conservatively in this Housing Element and split between the lower- and above -moderate income RHNA.

Site Selection
To identify additional sites with potential for new development or recycling opportunities, the following criteria were used:
• Parcel iscurrently vacant; nr
• |fparcel bnot vacant:
o Existing uses are not higher -density residential (condominiums or apartments) n Age ofstructure: most sites inthe inventory have existing uses that were built over 3O years ago, but most are older than 40 years old. In The downtown area, a few sites have structures that are 1ODyears old (but not historically si0nificant). o Characteristics of existing uses such as declining uses and large underused portions of the property.

n Land values are higher than improvement values. |nafew cases, aparcel isincluded with a slightly higher improvement value (usually less than five percent higher) if the structure is older or shows obvious signs of deferred maintenance or if the site is underutilized (characterized by large surface parking or unused surface area on the site). o No recent, significant enhancements have been made (exempt enhancements include site cleanup orpaint)
n Gas stations are also not included since redevelopment is more complex given the need to mitigate underground storage tanks.
o Potential for lot consolidation is also taken into consideration including common ownership of adjacent parcels. Sites with multiple parcels are only included if the site functions as one use (one structure over multiple parcels) and the parcels are under common ownership.

Identifying potential sites must balance available information on the site with a visual and contextual assessment. While data pointing atolder structures or high improvement value can give a good sense of the redevelopment potential, for many sites visual cues are important. There are a few sites where the data indicates a higher improvement value or newer structure, but visual assessment shows that a structure shows signs of disrepair or is underdeveloped in comparison with development nearby. One site for example, is an older liquor store with surface parking in an area with well -maintained, more intensely developed office uses. On the other hand, a site with older structures and a very high land value may not be an ideal site due to a new tenant that has invested in fagade improvements such as paint and signage or the nature of the use limits the redevelopment potential, such as a convalescent home. While any of these properties can redevelop, this sites inventory presents the City's good faith effort toidentify sites that show the most potential for redevelopment.

The capacity of sites that allow development densities of at least 30 units per acre are credited toward the lower -income RHNA, as allowed by State law. The California Government Code states that if a local government has adopted density standards consistent with the population -based criteria set by State law (at least 30 units per acre for Downey), HCD is obligated to accept sites with those density standards (30 units per acre or higher) as appropriate for accommodating the jurisdiction's share of regional housing need for lower -income households. Land use designations with density ranges near the default density are considered appropriate to accommodate housing for moderate -income households.

Assembly B01397
Consistent with updated Housing Element law (Assembly Bill 1397) related to the suitability of small and large sites, the lower -income sites inventory presented in this section is predominately limited to parcels between 0.5 and l8acres in size, as HCD has indicated these size parameters best accommodate lower - income housingneed.|nthisinven1oqy, several sites comprising one ormore parcels are less than one- half ocneinsize.Theseshesareindmdedbecause1hemultip|eparce|sfunctionmaonesite such asa structure and its attached, surface, parking lot or a single structure located on multiple parcels. Small sites (less than one-half acre) meeting the default density standard are credited toward the moderate- andabove'moderateincomecate0oriestoaoountfnrapotentia|varietyuftypes,sizes,andamenity levels in future higher -density development projects.

AB 1397 also adds specific criteria for assessment of the realistic availability of non -vacant sites during

HnusinGEkementmustpresent"substantia|evidence"thettheexbtnguseduesnotconstitutean impediment for additional residential use onthe site. Due tuthe built -out nature of Downey, most sites have existing uses. Non -vacant sites included in the inventory have been chosen due to their location, existing uses, and potential for intensification. To ensure that appropriate sites have been chosen, properties that show recent investments or updates or that contain uses of local importance are not included.

Twenty-five parcels within 15 properties in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan are subjecttothe re- use provioionsofA813B7,vvhiohrequiresthatvacantskesidentUiedintheprevioustwoHousinA Elements and non -vacant sites identified in the previous Housing Element only be deemed adequate to accommodate a portion of the housing need for lower -income households if the site is zoned at residential densities consistent with the default density established by HCD (30 units per acre) and the site allows residential use by right for housing developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower -income households. The parcels subject to AB 1397 are identified in the sites inventory table in Appendix B. Non -vacant sites identified in the previous Housing Element but credited toward the moderate'orabnve moderate -income RH0Ainthe current Housing Element are not subject to the provisions of AB 1397 since they are not being used to address the lower -income RHNA.

Currently Available Sites
The inventory of sites that have appropriate zoning in place includes underutilized land in the Low Density Residential (LDR)/R-1 and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR)/R-2 General Plan/zoning designations and within the Downtown Downey and Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plans.

The sites have the appropriate land use and zoning designations in place and do not require any rezoning actions. Projected accessory dwelling unit (ADU) production is also included in this section as a resource to meet the RHNA. A summary of currently available sites is presented in Table 4.3, Figure 4.2, and detailed listing consistent with state law isincluded inthe appendix.

Additional land resources are available for future residential development onunderutilized Medium Density Residential/R-3 sites, commercial corridor sites, and two commercial centers. Due to the allowable densities and uses allowed on these sites, they require changes to the General Plan land use plan and zoning map; these sites will be discussed later in this section as sites that require rezoning

parcels, 1.74 acres total
Downtown Downey Sp�cific f�lan.
sites) and 1.75 acres total
sites) and 2.05 acres total
(6 sites) and 4.39 acres total
-
Rancho Los Amigos - South Campus
300
300
600
Specific Plan
_2
F�4
4 6,332
• Estimated ADU production are credited toward the RHNA consistent with HCD guidelines and SCAG affordability distribution assumptions (SCAG Regional Accessory Dwelling Unit Affordability Analysis, 2020) • Sites allowing the State -designated default density standard (at least 30 du/ac) are credited toward the lower income RHNA. Small sites meeting the default density standard are credited toward the moderate- and above moderate - income category.

Accessory Dwelling Units
Consistent with state law, a projection of ADU development during the planning period is included in the site inventory. While it isimpossible topredict the number ofADUsthat will bedeveloped inthe p|annin0periud(2D21'2UZ9),the[i1yhasestimateda|eve|ofADUdeve|opmenttha1accountsforpent- updemandatthestartnf1hep|anninQperiodandthepo1enda||eve|in0o#ofAQUdewe|upmen1inthe later part of the planning period. Interest in constructing ADUs is high in Downey and throughout the state; in 2019, 20 AIDU permits were issued and in 2020, 53 ADUs permits were issued, an increase of 165 percent. In 2021, as of October, 85 ADU permits have been issued which translates to 100 ADU permits by the end of the year, an increase of 89 percent from the previous year. Toaccount for pent- up demand,the[ityisestimabngmnincreoseinnextfevvyearsvvithaneventua||eve|inKoff.TheCity has seen a steady increase in ADU development and expects a continued increase given the lack of new, affordable housing units in the region and the emerging ease and resources available for ADU development. The following ADUestimate assumptions are made:
«° 2U22and 2823:75percent increase from 2O31(15Upermits per year) 0 2O24:25percent increase from 2U2l(125permits each year)

0 2027 thmugh2O29: 25percent decrease from 202l(75 permits each year) Based on these assumptions, it is estimated that 850 ADUs will be permitted during the planning period.

The projected ADUs are included as credits consistent with HCD guidelines. As part of Housing Element implementation, the City will take actions tofoster and facilitate ADUdevelopment. The projected ADUs are included in the sites inventory consistent with HCD guidelines and SCAG's affordability distribution assumptions (approved by HCD).

S89Projections
In September 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 9 into law, with an effective date of January 1, 2022. SB 9 (1) mandates ministerial approval of duplexes on lots zoned for a single-family residence and (2) requires ministerial approval of subdivisions of single-family lot into two lots, creating the theoretical possibility offour units on each single-family parcel inthe state (with some exceptions). The Terner Center for Housing Innovation at LIC Berkeley conducted extensive analysis statewide to determine how many parcels could feasibly utilize the provisions of SB 9 and found that approximately seven percent ofsingle-family parcels throughout the State may redevelop inthis way.

However, that number is increased in communities, such as Downey, with higher average parcel sizes and regional housing market pressures. In Downey, it is estimated that approximately 9 percent of oinQ|e4ami|ypaoe|smnu|dpotentiaUyredeve|op,tnaos|adngintothepctenda|fur1,6UDadditiona| housing units in the community. The Terner analysis does not set a horizon year for this buildout.

Conservatively estimating that five percent of the ultimate buildout could occur in the next eight years, a projection for an additional 80 housing units through SB 9 lot splits and duplex provisions are assumed for the next planning period. Because the affordability of such units is unknown at this time, they are allocated to the above -moderate income category. Included in the Housing Element is a program with actions aimed at facilitating and encouraging ADU development in Downey.

The sites inventory includes 0.70 acres of vacant and 1.04 acres of underutilized land in the Low Density Residential (LDR)/R-1 designation. These LDR/R-1 sites allow a maximum residential density of 8.9 units per acre. Combined, the six sites have adevelopment capacity ofl4units.

The sites inventory includes 2.3 acres of vacant and 3.2 acres of underutilized land in the Low Medium Density Residential (MDR)/R'J designation. These UNDR/R'2 sites allow a residential density of9tu 17 units per acre. The 10 sites have an overall development capacity of 94 units.

Underutilized sites included in this inventory have been chosen based on the potential capacity increase available to property owners. On these sites, the residential capacity is two to 13 times the existing development. Existing uses onthe sites are older orshow signs ufdisinvestment ordeferred maintenance, indicating a "ripeness" for redevelopment.

Downtown Downey Specific Plan Sites
The Downtown Downey Specific Plan, adopted in 2010, was initiated by the City to guide growth and development in Downtown, encourage economic revitalization, and create a lively center of activity. The Specific Plan encompasses 131 acres located at the geographic center of the City and plans for a mix of uses in five unique districts, each with specific development standards and design guidelines. Downtown Downey is envisioned as a vibrant urban center providing a wide array of dining, working, living, shopping, entertainment, and cultural opportunities all within a short walking distance. Historically, the area around Downey Avenue from Firestone Boulevard to Fifth Street has been identified as the

Downtown district o{Downey. Downtown Downey bat the center efthe community, containing major landmarks such as City Hall, the City Library, the Civic Theater, the Downey Depot, and the Rives Mansion. One of the Specific Plan's six catalytic strategies is allowing a wide range of housing types to provide customer base for retail uses and create a daytime and nighttime population in Downtown.

Current development trends in Downtown show that higher -density development on currently developed properties is feasible and realistic. Residential development since plan adoption includes various ownership multi -family developments and two affordable developments: the Heritage Court senior housing development (31 units at a density of 49.6 units per acre in Downtown Downey Specific Man District Z Downtown Residential District) and Downey View, a SO'unitdeve|upment (on a O.S'acve site at a density of 96 units per acre in Downtown Downey Specific Plan, District 5: Firestone Boulevard Gateway District). A program is included in the Housing Plan and directs the City to monitor development in the Specific Plan area and make any needed amendments if constraints to development inDowntown are identified.

There has been development interest for properties inthe Specific Plan area. Staff has received a mixture of inquiries for both commercial and mixed -use development in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan. Most interest has been in the Downtown Core or the Firestone Boulevard Gateway districts of the Specific Plan area. Staff had multiple meetings with two separate property owners who had recently acquired properties in the Downtown and expressed significant interest in mixed -use development on Firestone Boulevard. Staff provided information on available density bonuses and consistently responded to extensive questions from the property owners and their architects. Each separately determined that theywereunab|eto"pend|ou1"theprojectbecauseconstruriioncos$arecurrendy very high. The properties have not been developed with either commercial or residential development.

The properties have not changed hands since the initial meetings so staff believes there may be renewed interest in developing the properties at later date.

The City used the ULI Office hours to seek guidance from the development community to fully assess constraints and viability of potential inventory sites by establishing a review process with the ULI group.

The City held four virtual meetings with a subcommittee of the ULI group made up of a variety of large- scalehousinQdeve|opemwhospeda|izeinmarketra1eandaffordab|ehoudnDdeve|opments.Regarding the viability of potential sites that were reviewed, feedback from the group focused significantly on the surrounding uses. The ULI group was interested in the proximity to grocery stores, shopping centers, existing multi -family housing development; these factors increased the "a\1rariive"nature ofthe sites and viability for development. The Downtown Downey Specific Plan is centrally located and meets many ofthe criteria pointed out bythe UL| panel.

Fifty-one sites (with a combined realistic but conservative capacity of 1,076 units) have been identified in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan on sites that allow development at a range of densities, from up to 40 units per acre in Districts 1,2, and 3 and up to 75 units per acre in District 5. Residential development is not allowed in District 4: Civic Center, which is reserved for government and public facility uses such as [by Hall, local and regional government offices parks, and transit centers. The City owns several properties in the Downtown area, including a 399-space, multi -level public parking structure. Site capacity in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan is summarized in Table 4.3 and shown on Figure 4.1. Site selection in Downtown is based on the underutilized nature of the sites given the area's high profile and the increasing demand for residential development. Sites with existing uses are typically older and underutilized given the development potential afforded bythe Specific Plan development standards.

Examples of existing uses include small-scale commercial uses, car washes, and structures with large

surface parking lots. Sites with existing residential uses provide the opportunity for significant capacity increases.
0 District 1: The Paramount Boulevard Professional District is located east of Paramount Boulevard and generally west of Parrot Avenue between Second and Seventh Streets. The primary intent ofthis District btocreate a professional office environment with a residential component. District 1 allows 100 percent residential projects but buildings fronting Paramount Boulevard require that residential uses be allowed on the second floor or above of the building.

For all other streets in the district, residential uses are permitted on any floor. For properties fronting Paramount Boulevard, residential uses may be located on the second and third floors.

The existing uses on District 1 sites are all over 40 years old and have land values higher than improvement values. The four sites in District 1 have a realistic capacity of 53 units on sites allowing residential densities of201m4Uunits per acre.

District 2: The Downtown Residential District is located north of Second Street and south of Fifth Street, between College Avenue and La Reina Avenue. The primary intent of this district is to establish a residential neighborhood within Downtown. Neigh borh ood-servi ng commercial uses are permitted on the ground floor only. District 2 allows 100 percent residential projects. The existing uses on District 2 sites are all over 40 years old and most have land values higher than improvement values. Two sites are included with higher improvement values: one is included because the structure isvacant and for sale and the other is included because the structure is over 50 years old. A study by Terner Center for Housing Innovation at the University of California at Berkeley found that parcels with older commercial buildings were more likely to be converted to residential use in the Los Angeles metro area as older buildings are more likely to be run- downoroutdated,thereby|endin0themse|vestovedeve|opmentTheeightsitesinDistric12 have a realistic capacity of 56 units on sites allowing residential densities of 20 to 40 units per acre. Heritage Court, a 31-unit senior housing development built at a density of 49.6 units per acre, isinthis district.
• District 3:The Downtown Core District is generally located north ofSecond Street and south of Fifth Street, between La Reina Avenue and Civic Center Drive. The vision for this district is a vibrant pedestrian -oriented downtown with a mix ofuses with commercial uses onthe ground floor and residential on the second and third floors. District 3 allows 100 percent residential projects but buildings fronting Downey Avenue require that residential uses be allowed on the second floor or above of the building. For all other streets in the district, residential uses are permitted on any floor. The existing uses on District 3 sites are all over 30 years old but most are over 50 years old, and two sites have structure built 100 years ago. Only six of the 19 parcels that make up the sites in District 3 have improvement values higher than land values but these structures are all over 50 years old and three of these are over 95 years old. The 14 sites in District 3 have a realistic capacity of 155 units on sites allowing residential densities of 20 to 40 units per acre.
w District 5:The Firestone Boulevard Gateway District is located north of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way and south of Second Street, between Paramount Boulevard and Brookshire Avenue. The vision for District 5 is a lively area consisting of high intensity/density development with flexible retail, office, and residential space. District aUum/s 100 percent residential projects but buildings fronting Firestone Boulevard require that residential uses be allowed on the second floor or above of the building. For all other streets in the district, residential uses are permitted on any floor. Along Firestone Boulevard, the ground floor is reserved for office and commercial uses; residential uses may be located on the second floor and above. Most ofthe parcels that make up the District 5 sites have existing uses on them built over 50 years ago. Of

the 35 parcels that make up the District 5 sites, only four are less than 30 years old and these are included because one is a surface parking lot that is independently owned (not associated with the adjacent building) and the other are part of a center where surface parking makes up the majority of the acreage and a large empty building. The 28 sites in District 5 have a realistic, but conservative, capacity of 877 units on sites allowing residential densities of 40 to 75 units per acre. Three of the sites are partially owned by the City of Downey, and several sites are 96 units per acre on a lot of just over one-half acre in size.

Base Map Features Downtown Downey Specific Plan Sites
— -- Downey City Boundary District 1
Parks and Open Space District 2
Rivers and Waterbodies District'3
Downtown Downey Specific Plan Area District 5

Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan Capacity
Capacity for 600 units is included as part of the newly adopted The Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan which will guide long-term development of a mixed -use, compact, and multi -modal environment. The Plan area is located on approximately 123 acres of County -owned land and will create a new neighborhood and district that includes cultural uses and public spaces, stronger connections with local neighborhoods, and connectivity with mobility options in a manner that will reinforce the character and history of Downey and the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus. The City applied for and received a $425,000 grant to create the specific plan around a new station that is planned for the future Eco-Rapid light rail line. The plan includes development of up to 700 units (including the Veterans Commons Project) atdensities of68to100units per acre. Based onthe densities expected tobedeveloped, the 600 units (exclusive of the Veterans Commons Project) can be credited toward the lower -income RHNA baoedon1hepnovisionsofState|owaMowinQdeve|opmentsat"defau|tdenoi1ies"(mt|east3Uunitsper acre in Downey) to be counted as lower -income sites. Nonetheless, recognizing that a variety ufhousing types and prices may be developed on the campus, the unit count is distributed more conservatively in this Housing Element and split between the lower- and above -moderate income RHNA.

Asthe Specific Plan area consists entirely ofproperty
owned bythe County ofLos Angeles, the County was
consulted throughout development ofthe Specific Plan.

During these consultations, the County stated that they had begun receiving inquiries and preliminary interest
inmulti-family housing developments within the
Specific Plan area before the Specific Plan was finalized and adopted onOctober 1Z,Z02I.The Plan was
adopted very recently aosuch noactivity has yet been
submitted under the new provisions, however, there
has been significant activity and inquiry surrounding the potential for development inthis area. The property is
owned bythe County ofLos Angeles, sothey are the
entity that has been approached with potential housing
development projects. Information about interest was
shared with Downey City staff bythe County, but the
City has not received any preliminary proposals. City
staff has received general inquiries from different
developers about potential for development indifferent
areas within the Specific Plan. Staff always directs inquiries tuthe property owner before engaging in further discussions about potential development.

The Plan area is generally bounded by the Imperial Highway to the north, Gardendale Street to the south, Rives Avenue to the east, and Old River School Road to the west. Within the southwest portion of the Plan area, Metro is building light rail station located adjacent boGandenda|eStreet as part ofthe planned West Santa Ana Branch (WSAB) light rail transit corridor. The Plan area's proximity to a major transit facility is anticipated to further generate activity in the area and significant development is anticipated within the Specific Plan area during the 2021-2029 planning period. 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT 4-15

Remaining RHINA
The City can meet 46percent ofthe RHNA with approved and proposed projects, pnojectedADW development, and development on vacant and underutilized land in two residential designations and the Downtown Downey and Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plans. After accounting for this capacity, a shortfall of 3,553 units remains.

To address the shortfall, the City has identified various sites that, while appropriate for redevelopment and intensification, require General Plan amendments, zone changes, and the addition of residential overlays to facilitate residential development. Once appropriate land use and zoning actions are taken, the City can accommodate the remaining RHNA.

Sites that will be rezoned and used to address an unaccommoclated, lower -income RHNA are subject to additional requirements under State law. Housing Element law (Government Code 6558l2[h])requires that1he[ityaccommodateaU1he|owepincome,unaccommodatedRHNAonshesthatane:

1. Zoned to permit owner -occupied and rental multifamily residential use by right for developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower -income households during the planning period; and

2. Permit at least 16 units per site at a density of at least 20 units per acre Also, at least half of the very low- and low-income housing need must be accommodated on sites designated for residential use and for which nonresidential uses or mixed -uses are not permitted, except that a city or county may accommodate all the very low- and low-income housing need on sites designated for mixed -uses if those sites allow 100 percent residential use and require that residential use occupy 5Opercent ofthe total floor area ufamixed-use project.

Sites to accommodate the moderate- and above moderate -income RHNA are not subjectto these requirements. Sites that meet the density requirement but do not have a minimum capacity for 16 units are credited toward the moderate -and above moderate -income RHWAshortfaU.

Table 4.4 summarizes the sites to be rezoned and shows that once appropriate land use and zoning actions are taken, the City can adequately accommodate the remaining RHNA. While the table shows a deficit of 517 units for the low-income RHNA, those units can be addressed with the surplus of 969 units on very low-income sites. Detailed descriptions of sites to be rezoned are presented following Table 4.4 and on Figure 4.2; a detailed listing of sites is included in the appendix as required by State law.

Medium Density Residential (R- 83 316 314
3) Sites (133 parcels, 22.4 acres
Lotal)
Low Density Residential site to 4 40
be Rezoned to Medium Density
Residential (R-3)
(I parcel, 1.3 acres total)
Mixed -Use Sites 143
(21 parcels, 7.78 acres total)
Corridor Residential Overlay
"if—H
am
44 46 42 231
Telegraph Road
108 64 57
229
(15 sites, 21 parcels, 7.33
acres total)
Paramount Boulevard
427 134 129
690
(42 sites, 49 parcels, 22.88
acres total)
Florence Avenue
55 55
(2 sites, 2 parcel, 1.82 acres
total)
Imperial Highway
341 52 49
442
(20 sites, 25 parcels, 14.72
acres total)
Bellflower/Washburn Stand
106
106
Alone Site (1 parcel, 3.5
acres total)
7421 Firestone Boulevard
23 23
Stand Alone Site (1 parcel,

0.77 acres total)
Stonewood Center
175 175 524
874
Downey Landing
170 170 511
851
Florence Avenue/1-5 Specific
92 46 46
184
Plan L_�_
Total Sites
1,727 1,003 1,712
4,442
Remaining RHNA after
758 517 712 1,566
3,553
approved/proposed projects and
sites currently in place
Remaining RHNA (-
+969 -517 +291 +146
+889
shortfall/+surplus)
Notes:
* Sites with multiple parcels are only included
if the site functions as one use (one structure over multiple parcels) and the
parcels are under common ownership.
**Sites allowing the State -designated default density standard (at least 30 du/ac) and meet the rollover requirements of Government Code 65583.2[h] are credited toward the lower -income RHNA. Small sites (less than 0.5 acres) meeting the
default density standard but not the 16-unit capacity requirements for rollover sites are credited toward the moderate- and above -moderate income category.
0111111111111111151111111

The City's Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan land use designation and the implementing R-3 zoning district allow for developments with densities between 18 and 24 units per acre. The lack of available developable land, large sites, and the current development oflower-density residential uses means that higher -density residential projects are few in Downey today. To incentivize private redeve|npmentofpropertiesintheR'3zone,the[ityvviMincreasethedeve|opmentpotentia|onsites designated MDR and zoned R-3. Updated land use and development standards will increase the maximum density to 40 units per acre. The City will also explore increasing the minimum density as part of a comprehensive land use plan update. The methodology in this Housing Element assumes only the increase to a maximum density of 40 units per acre and uses 80 percent of maximum to calculate realistic capacity.

Aathe land use change will apply toall KXDR/R'9properties, the potential for new development b significant. This Housing Element only includes a small subset of sites that show potential for redevelopment. The sites identified have a combined capacity for 757 units distributed among the affordability levels based on size and realistic capacity. Sites meeting the size and minimum capacity requirement (I6 units) outlined in State law for shortfall sites are credited toward the lower -income RHNA. Small sites (less than 0.5acres) that meet the density requirement but do not have a minimum capacity for 16 units are credited toward the moderate- and above moderate -income RHNA shortfall.

Most of the MDR/R-3 sites included in the inventory existing residential uses, but only sites with a maximum of two existing units was included. Two sites have four existing units but are included because the sites have capacity for afour-fold increase in capacity. Most sites have land values that are higher than improvement value and about half have a land value that is twice the value of improvements on the property. A handful of sites are included with slightly lower land values (compared with improvement values), but those sites were chosen due tothe potential capacity increase on the size or the age of the structures (all over 60 years old). The sites chosen have a General Plan designation of MDR and a zoning designation of R-3. While there are many more potential sites in the MDR designation, many of those sites do not have the appropriate zoning and are excluded from the inventory. However, these properties will have the correct zoning when the City completes its General Plan and Zoning updates and additional capacity (that is not accounted for in this Housing Element) will be available. The average age of the structures on the sites in the inventory is 73 years. The handful of sites that have relatively newer structures (22 to 24 years old) are only included due to the significant potential for additional capacity or if the land value is especially high in comparison with the site's improvement value.

Increased maximum densities would allow for a significant increase in capacity and serve as a redevelopment incentive. A current project at 7224 Florence Avenue will result in replacement of five older housing units with 12 new units, showing that the demand for redevelopment exists. Sites with multi -story apartment buildings are not included in the inventory because the capacity increase is lower.

Nonetheless, property owners for these aging residential uses may see the 66 percent increase in maximum density asanincentive for redevelopment.

A 1.3-acre site included in the inventory is currently designated for Low Density Residential development (111 zone) and developed as commercial truck parking or storage. The property owner for the site, located on Stewart and Gray Road adjacent to the City's western city boundary, has requested a

land use/zone change to allow development of high -density residential units. The property owner has expressed interest in developing 44 to 48 units and including an affordable component of 11 percent of units affordable to very low-income households. The site is included in the inventory with a capacity of 44 units with four of those units designated for very low-income affordability and 40 for above modenate'inoomeaffordabi|ity.

The Mixed -Use General Plan designation allows for integrated developments with significant residential components. The designation applies &nthe Downey Landing and Downtown Downey Specific Plan areas, Downey and Warren High Schools, and an area at the southern end of the City along Lakewood Boulevard north and south 1'105. This last location is intended to leverage the Lakewood Boulevard station of the Metro Green Line with future, intensified transit -oriented development. The mixed -use area in this part of Downey supports a variety of commercial, office, and residential uses. The Mixed -Use General Plan designation allows a density of up to 24 units per acre. The City has never adopted an implementing zone for the Mixed -Use designation.

To incentivize redevelopment of properties in the area around the Green Line station and other focal areas such as the Downey Landing and Downtown Downey Specific Plan areas, the City will increase the development potential on sites designated for Mixed -Use by adopting an implementing zone and development standards that allow 30 or more units per acre. The City will also explore establishing a maximum density upwards of5A units per acre, potentially higher. The maximum density analysis will occur as part of the land use update to occur after Housing Element adoption. The methodology in this Housing Element assumes only the establishment of a minimum density of 30 units per acre and that density is used to calculate realistic capacity as that will be the required density for standalone residential and mixed -use developments.

As the land use change will apply to all Mixed -Use properties in Downey, the potential for new development is significant. This Housing Element only includes a small subset of sites that show potential for redevelopment. The sites identified have acombined capacity for 23lunits, distributed among the affordability levels based on size and realistic capacity. Sites meeting the size and minimum capacity requirement (16 units) outlined in State law for shortfall sites are credited toward the lower - income RHNA. Small sites (less than 0.5 acres) that meet the density requirement but do not have a minimum capacity for 16 units are credited toward the moderate- and above moderate -income RHNA K8ixed'Usesites\nduded|ntheinventoryhavebeenchosenbasedonexisdnguses land value compared to improvement value, and the potential for the potential increase in residential capacity. All mixed'useuitesarestand'a|onesiteo,andno|otconso|idatiunisaoumed.Thesiteohaveavarietyuf existing uses, including single-family homes, strip commercial centers, and smaller, older commercial and office uses that show lack of investment. The average age of the structures on the sites in the inventory is 68 years and nineteen of the 21 parcels that make up the mixed -use sites have structures that are 60 years or older. The handful of sites that have relatively newer structures (22 to 24 years old) are only included due to the significant potential for additional capacity or if the land value is especially high in comparison with the site's improvement value. All but one parcel that make up the mixed -use sites have a potential for a three -fold increase in existing capacity. Increased maximum densities would allow for a significant increase in capacity and serve as a redevelopment incentive for property owners,

particularly for those properties near the Metro station. As part of the land use plan update,the City will also explore additional locations 1udesignate for mixed use.

SitesBase map Features Approved Propoed Projects (Credits) Sites To Be Rezoned — - — - — Downey City Boundary JIM Approved or Proposed Projects JIM MDR/R3 Sites to Rezone Currently in Place WM Mixed -Use Sites to Rezone
MMON Parks and Open Space
NOW Rivers and Waterbodies M& W Vacant and Underutilized R1 commercial specific Plan Sites to Rezonc IM Vacant and Underutilized R2 Residential Overlay
Im Downtown fr.... SP Sites ResidentialOverlay Zone

The major arterial roadways traversing Downey— Firestone Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, Telegraph Road, Lakewood Boulevard, Florence Avenue, and Imperial Highway —are lined with commercial uses interspersed with residential developments ofvarying densities. Many corridor sections are characterized by older, strip commercial shopping centers with prominent parking lots. Most structures along the corridors are more than 40years old and many over SQyears old. Most residential uses on commercial properties are currently not allowed. Data from several studies from the TernerCenter for Housing Innovation at the University of California at Berkeley shows that the underutilization of commercial land used for office and retail has only accelerated given the uncertainty around remote wvorkandbrich'and'mortarretai|inapost'pundemiceconomy.From2O14to201y,about38,OUQhomes were built on commercially zoned land across the state's four major metro areas. Of those homes, 28,000m/ere built inthe Los Angeles region, contributing 13.Q percent ofthe reQion'snet housing growth during that period. With the changes in the retail environment resulting from increased use of on-line commerce and the effects of COVID-19, many centers and buildings exhibit signs of underuse and disinvestment.

To incentivize redevelopment and investment in properties along the major commercial corridors and to provide opportunities for much -needed housing, the City will adopt anoverlay zone that will allow high - density housinGdeve|upmen1asaby'ri§htuseataminimumdenshyof3Ounhsperacve.Theoveday zone will apply to non -industrial, non-R-1 zoned properties located in key areas of six key commercial corridors identified on Figure 4.2 (Residential Overlay Zone). Allowing residential development as a by- rightuseintheseareasvvou|dafMrmative|yfurtherfairhousing(asnequiresby|aw)byintrodudnQnew housing in virtually every area of the City. The City's strategy to expand residential development opportunities, and to allow those uses as a by -right use, is strongly supported by the Terner Center studies that found that new homes built on commercial parcels comprised meaningful amounts of overall housing growth in areas where commercial to residential conversions are likely explicitly allowed. The studies found nearly double the rate of conversions of commercial to residential uses in cities that allow multifamily development in commercial areas compared with those that do not.

The corridor residential overlay will be refined as part of the General Plan and Zoning updates and may include properties beyond what is identified in this Housing Element. Because Housing Element law requires identification of specific sites, individual sites are identified in this inventory. Nonetheless, the nvedaywou|dapp|y1onon'indmstria|,non'R'1zonedproperties|ocatedinkeyareasofsixkey commercial corridors identified on Figure 4.2 (Residential Overlay Zone). The minimum density for the corridor will be set at 30 units per acre. A maximum density will be determined as part of the land use plan update to occur after Housing Element adoption. The methodology in this Housing Element assumes a realistic capacity of 30 units per acre. It is expected that the overlay will allow greater than 30 units per acre, so the capacity on identified sites is conservative and accounts for the development of non-residential uses such as a mixed -use development that may include commercial or office uses. The inventory addresses more than the RHNAassigned tothe City tuand allows for the development ofnon- residential uscsonthesesites.

Because residential uses already exist along the corridors, the addition of new housing would not be unusual and given market demand, would be feasible and reasonable. Consultation with development experts from the Urban Land Institute (ULI-LA) indicated that developers prefer to develop multi -family housing in areas where multi -family housing already exists. The ULI panel expressed that this approach ensures more limited pushback from the public in areas where multi -family uses are being introduced as

enew use. The corridors identified have a mix of commercial, office interspersed with residential developments of varying densities including older higher density one- and two-story apartment buildings. Future multi -family or high -density mixed -use developments along the identified corridors represent asimilar use 10what iscurrently developed.

Housing/residential overlay zones are added zoning layers that give property owners options and reason to consider either selling to a residential developer or making investments themselves in housing. In locations where land use policy and zoning do not allow residential development, use of overlays can facilitate housing production by avoiding a lengthy General Plan amend ment/rezon i ng process. Overlays can also allow a mix of uses, such as adding housing to an underused portion of a large site, like a parking lot. Overlay zones may include a variety of incentives to developers to include affordable units in their projects, such as:
• Increased density orallowable heights
m` Adjusted parking requirements
• By -right zoning oradministratkmproject approval
• Streamlined permitting
• Allowing housing in locations not zoned for residential uses • Incentives for lot consolidation
For this Housing Element, six corridors have been identified for application of a new residential overlay zone: Firestone Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, Telegraph Road, Lakewood Boulevard, Florence Avenue, and Imperial Highway. While the overlay would apply to most of the identified corridors, only a handful of sites are included in this inventory. Sites chosen for the Housing Element do not include residential uses and instead focus onsites that are underasedbased unthe availability ofland (such as large surface parking lots), older non-residential uses that have not been improved or shows signs of deferred maintenance, and vacant or for -sale properties. Gas stations are also not included since redevelopment is more complex given the need to mitigate underground storage tanks. Consistent with updated Housing Element law (Assembly Bill 1397) related to the suitability of small and large sites, the lower -income sites inventory presented in this section is predominately limited to parcels between 0.5 and 10acres in size, as HCD has indicated these size parameters best accommodate lower -income housing need. In this inventory, several sites comprising one or more parcels are less than one-half acre in size. These sites are included because the multiple parcels function as one site, such as a structure and its attached, surface, parking lot orasingle structure located on multiple parcels. Mu|ti'parce|sites are under common ownership. Sites meeting the size and minimum capacity requirement (16 units) outlined in State law for shortfall sites are credited toward the lower -income RHNA. Small sites (less than 0.5 acres or those sites with a capacity less than the 16 units required by law) are credited toward the moderate- and above moderate -income RH0Ashortfall.

Telegraph Road
Telegraph Road forms Downey's northern boundary and abuts the City of Pico Rivera. Only the south side of the corridor is in the city of Downey. Uses along this corridor include lower -scale commercial uses and older, high -density residential apartments interspersed with some newer high -density housing development, such as the 39-unit High Point townhouse development. The overlay is applied to over 162 acres along Telegraph Road but only a few sites are specifically identified in this Housing Element as required bylaw. The 15 Telegraph Road overlay sites that have been specifically identified for this Housing Element have a combined capacity for 229 units, distributed among the affordability levels based onsize and realistic capacity (see Table 4.4).

Paramount Boulevard runs the full length of the City between its north and south boundaries. Uses consist largely of lower -scale commercial and small office uses —many with large surface parking lots — and a mix ufresidential uses, from single-family homes to apartment buildings. The corridor also forms the western boundary of the Downtown Downey Specific Plan. (No sites in the Specific Plan area are planned for the overlay since the plan already accommodates higher -density residential uses.) The overlay is applied to over 106 acres along Paramount Boulevard but only a few sites are specifically identified inthis Housing Element usrequired bylaw. The 42Paramount Boulevard overlay sites that have been specifically identified for this Housing Element have a combined capacity for 690 units, distributed among the affordability levels based on size and realistic capacity (see Table 4.4).

Florence Avenue isaneast-west corridor that runs the full length ufthe City. The uses along this corridor include lower -scale commercial strip centers (many with larger surface parking lots) and a mix of residential uses, from single-family homes to apartment buildings. The overlay is applied to over 13 acres nfproperties onFlorence Avenue west ofOld River School Road but only afew sites are specifically identified in this Housing Element as required by law. The two Florence Avenue overlay site that has been specifically identified for this Housing Element has a capacity for 55 units, distributed among the affordability levels based on size and realistic capacity (see Table 4.4).

Imperial Highway
Imperial Highway is a major east -west regional corridor that runs from the City of El Segundo east to eastern Orange County. In Downey, Imperial Highway, a Caltrans-owned roadway, runs the full length of the City just north of 1-105. Major uses along this corridor include government uses such as administration offices for the County of Los Angeles, the Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, and Kaiser Permanent Medical Center (within the Downey Landing Specific Plan). Like all other corridors discussed here, commercial uses predominate, with a scattering of residential developments, but also parks, schools, and industrial businesses. The overlay isapplied toover 83acres along Imperial Boulevard but only a few sites are specifically identified in this Housing Element as required by law. The 20 Imperial Highway overlay sites that have been specifically identified for this Housing Element have a combined capacity for 442 units, distributed among the affordability levels based on size and realistic capacity (see Table 4.4).

Lakewood Boulevard
Lakewood Boulevard runs the full length of the City between its north and south boundaries. Uses consist largely nflower-scale commercial and small office uses —many with large surface parking lots — and a mix of residential uses, from single-family homes to apartment buildings. The overlay is applied to properties on Lakewood Boulevard south of Stewart and Gray Road. This southern portion of the Lakewood Boulevard corridor was identified for its location near to major activity focal areas, the Downey Landing Specific Plan area, and the Lakewood Station for the Metro C (Green) light rail line.

While no sites have been identified for this Housing Element along Lakewood Boulevard, the overlay is applied toover 49acres.

Firestone Boulevard
Firestone Boulevard is an east -west corridor that runs the full length of the City. The corridor also runs adjacent to the Downtown Downey, Stonewood Center, and Lakewood/Firestone Specific Plan areas. (Specific Plan areas are excluded from the overlay as development on those properties are guided by

development standards in their respective Specific Plans). Uses along this corridor range from more intensive commercial and residential uses (such as those in the Downtown Downey and 5tonewood Center Specific Plan areas) to smaller commercial uses with a scattering of residential developments, but also parks, schools, and industrial businesses. Various sites along Firestone Boulevard are included in the sites inventory but are located outside the overlay in the Downtown Downey and Stonewood Centers Specific Plan areas. While no sites have been identified for this Housing Element along Firestone Boulevard (outside of the Downtown Downey and Stonewood Centers Specific Plan areas), the overlay is applied tnover 1G6acres.

Stand Alone Sites
Two standalone sites are included in the Corridor Residential Overlay due to owner interestin redeveloping the properties. No project plans are available as the owners have not begun any plans to develop the properties but are interested in residential development with the potential to include affordable units. One 3.53-acre site is included in the overlay with a capacity for 106 units at a minimum density of 30 units per acre. The site is located on the southeast corner of Bellflower Boulevard and Washburn Road. The site has been included as there has been property owner interest turedevelop the property with housing. The site is located across the street from two newer regional commercial center.

TheDovvneyLandinQandthePromenadeatDovxneyarecommercia|"|ifegY|e"centem,providingp|aces for shopping, eating, and public gathering. These centers are still being developed and new residential uses are anticipated. The site is ripe for redevelopment given its large size, the adjacent uses, and its location less than half a mile north of Imperial Boulevard, one of the region's major corridors. The oin8|e'parceil5'aoreoitehasareaUaticmapacityuf1D6unito.Asecondsiteis|ucoteda|nnAFirestonc Boulevard (at Old River School Road) and is currently developed with a car wash and auto lube business and a surface parking lot. The 0.77-acre site has the capacity for 23 units. The City will work closely with the developers to provide assistance and to work toward the inclusion of affordable units in the developments.

The Housing Element sites inventory includes three sites in non-residential specific plan areas. The sites are commercial in nature but provide ideal opportunities to add residential uses. Malls and shopping centers nationwide are in precarious position, as they are dependent upon struggling retailers — particularly department stores —and subject to growing consumer reliance on e-commerce. In their heyday, malls were popular shopping destinations and public gathering spaces. But in the past decade, as shopping dollars migrated online and many well-known retailers went out of business, many commercial centers have experienced an ongoing cycle of dwindling traffic, lower sales, and disappearing storefronts. One in four U.S. malls is expected to close by 2022, and mail vacancies are at an eight -year high, according to a 2017 report by Credit Suisse.2This trend is significant for mail owners, as the rate of retail store closures accelerated during the 2020-21 coronavirus pandemic.

Downey is largely built out, with little land to accommodate new housing development. Lack of housing supply compounds affordability and homelessness issues. By adding residential opportunities to the City's commercial centers, the City recognizes that diverse housing types and higher -density residential development will be necessary to meet pent-up demand and ensure affordable housing options for people of all ages, family sizes, and incomes. Also, higher -density residential development typically is more affordable than lower -density development and the only path toward significantly contributing to

housing affordability. Adding residential uses to these sites provides property owners with the incentive to invest.
� MR
Paramount Boulevard at Alameda Street

Lakewood Boulevard at Florence Avenue
•• • a r ,r • ;• - • r

The City has had ongoing communications with local housing developers, who have confirmed that home builders and property owners are interested in repurposingcommeoia| properties in Southern California, including Downey. Similar interest and projects have yielded positive results. ~ City of Whittier: Property owners of the Whittwood Center in nearby Whittier added a significant residential component to the southern portion of this commercial development. As part ofits current General Plan update, and with the property owner's concurrence, the City is redesignating the property for mixed -use, with a housing density of 60 units per acre. A development agreement with property owners will ensure a portion of units will be affordable. • City of Pasadena: In Pasadena, the 10 West Walnut project now under construction will result in 394nesidentia| units, ground -floor retail/restaurantapame, and afive-story office building, all being constructed on a former surface parking lot serving the Parsons corporate office building. • City of Paso Robles: Paso Robles is in the process of entitling River Walk Terrace, a new affordable senior housing site with 79units for seniors 62years ofage and older. The development site is 4.21 acres and will be within walking distance toseveral destinations, including department stores, groceries, pharmacies, and the Salinas River Trail. The General Plan designates this site as a Regional Commercial zoning district with a Mixed -Use Overlay. The City's 2021-2028 General Plan Housing Element update identified the vacant parcel as a suitable site for housing.
� City of Azusa: Citrus Junction consists of 102 new townhomes located adjacent to Citrus Crossing, a dominant retail hub on Alondra Boulevard and across the street from Azusa Pacific University. This neighborhood falls within a Mixed -Use District. w City of Redondo Beach: In 2019, Redondo Beach approved a proposed overhaul of the South Bay GaUeria,anenclosed shopping mail. The reinvention will retain commercial uses inanopen-air configuration while providing 300 new apartments, a 150-room hotel, and public gathering spaces.

StonewvoodCen1er Specific Plan
The Stunewood Center, also known as the Stonewnod Mail, is a Downy landmark. When the center was established inthe l96Us it was the largest commercial development in the community's history and one of the first regional shopping centers in Southern California. In 1990, the center underwent a $100- million transformation into an enclosed mail which included over40 new stores. The Stnnomood Specific Plan, adopted in 190g,was established toguide renovations ofthe 6Z'aoecommercial center, located at the southeast corner of Lakewood and Firestone Boulevards. The center is anchored bv four departments stores, avariety ofsmaller retailers and eateries. More than half ofthe property b dedicated tosurface parking.

The Stonewood Center presents an ideal opportunity for residential development, given the site configuration and acres ofsurface parking lots. Residential uses could easily beadded while retaining the existing commercial structures. Consistent with planned densities for other commercial sites,the City will add a residential component at a density of at least 30 units per acre. The residential component will be implemented by a residential or mixed -use overlay or through re -designation of properties should the Stonewood Specific Plan be rescinded. The City will evaluate the high end of the density range for this site as part of a comprehensive General Plan update but anticipates that the density range will be consistent with other high -density designations: at least 40 units per acre but potentially up to 60 units per acre given the site size and the Center's location along two major corridors. Site development standards will ensure buffering between new uses and residential

neighborhoods to the north and east. The
Stonewood Center's property management
company has expressed interest in a potential
redevelopment of the site and is initiating
similar projects for two nearby commercial
centers it owns outright.

Downey Landing Specific Plan
The amended (2011) Downey Landing Specific Plan contains a vision, land use concepts, infrastructure and service plans, design guidelines, and development regulations for approximately 154 acres of a former industrial property. The plan area, originally an industrial site, is in the southern portion of the City and bounded by Lakewood Boulevard, Stewart and Gray Road, Bellflower Boulevard, Imperial Highway, and Columbia Way. As of 2021, the Specific Plan area has been and will be developed into and Medical Office Complex on approximately 30 acres, and a 13-acre site for the Discovery Sports Complex and the Columbia Memorial Space Center. (NASA's space shuttle program included shuttle construction at this former industrial property.) The commercial portion of the site currently is developed with two commercial centers —the Downey Landing and the Promenade at Downey —with vacant land still available for development. The commercial centers are "lifestyle" centers, providing places for shopping, eating, and public gathering. The uses are relatively new and as such, in a better position to withstand the cycle of dwindling retail traffic, lower sales, and disappearing storefronts affecting commercial centers nationwide. Nonetheless, the remaining vacant parcels could be

consistent with the diversity of u1ses
envisioned in the Specific Plan
residential sites such as commercial
centers, the City will add a residential
least 30 units per acre. The residential
component will be implemented by a
Specific Plan amendment. The City will
evaluate the high end of the density
range for this site as part of a
acre —but potentially higher given the
site size and more urban character.

Assuming that residential uses would be
most appropriate inthe northern
(commercio|)portion nfthe site (llI
Downey Landing Specific Plan Area I
addition of a residential overlay allowing at least 30 units per acre would yield over 3,300 units. structures/uses, site improvements, public amenities, and interior roadways. The realistic capacity estimate uses only half of a 5.63-acre, vacant, City -owned parcel (based on expressed developer of 851 units at a residential density of 30 units per acre. The City will work with property owners and local developers to advocate for the inclusion of affordable. To account for the inclusion of affordable units and the potential for development of smaller units affordable by design or by market costs, income (20 percent or 170 units) and above moderate -income (60 percent of capacity or 511 units) Florence Avenuell-5 Specific Plan
Adopted in 1991, the Florence Avenue/1-5 Specific Plan was established to guide development and improvements in a 39-acre area located south of Florence Avenue between the 1-605 and 1-5 freeways. into the area. Residential uses are not currently allowed. Through the years, several successful automobile dealerships were established, including Cadillac and Honda. The Great Recession took a drastic toll on the local automobile industry, and the Ford, Lincoln, and Cadillac dealerships all closed in 2009. The remaining major auto use is the Honda World Downey facility that includes car sales and automobile services. The automobile sales portion of the business currently occupies a smaller parcel to the west of this site and the automobile service component occupies the identified 6.1- acre parcel. The

to the north of the identified site and leaving the 6.1-acre site available for residential development that will complement residential uses adjacent to the site. To incentivize residential development in this area, the City will add a residential component to the current Honda World site. While the current site is = ,",°""""-/n| imp /tiqmr,nxnded omthe west. east. and south with residential uses.

Consistent with densities for other
non-residential sites such as
a residential component to the site
at a density of at least 30 units per
:?gre. The residential component will
be implemented via a residential or
mixed -use overlay or through a re -
the Specific Plan is rescinded. The
density range for this site as part of
a comprehensive General Plan
update but anticipates estimates
the site capacity is credited toward the low-income (50 percent or 92 units), and the other half is credited to the moderate -income (25 percent or 46 units) and above moderate -income (25 percent of densities, but the use of a minimum density of 30 units per acre to estimate realistic capacity also accounts for the possible development of non-residential uses in a mixed -use setting. 4,verall, the sites inventory identified in this chapter (including sites that require rezoning actions) totap 7,414 units, 3,477 unit of which are in the very low- and low-income RHNA categories. Overall, the City.0 can adequately accommodate —and have excess capacity for —to accommodate the RHNA once X,�,#VrAni 4.5 shows a shortfall of 517 low-income units but thol can be addressed with the surplus of site capacity in the very low-income category. I

Sites Currently Available (including
1,269
379
203
928
2,779
estimated ADU production)
RHNA status (-shortfaIQ-E4sUrP]E1usJF
+291
+146 _1_±_8_89
Government Code Section 65863 stipulates that a jurisdiction must ensure that its Housing Element inventory can accommodate its share of the RHNA by income level throughout the planning period. If a jurisdiction approves a housing project at a lower density or with fewer units by income category than identified in the Housing Element, it must quantify at the time of approval the remaining unmet housing need at each income level and determine whether there is sufficient capacity to meet that need. If not, the city must "identify and make available" additional adequate sites to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of housing need by income level within 180 days of approving the reduced -density project.

The sites inventoried in this Housing Element all lie within urban areas well served by street and utility infrastructure. The City operates its own street, water, wastewater, and storm drain systems, and prepares master plans to ensure infrastructure improvements are planned and funded to meet growth needs.

Site Infrastructure
Downey is fully developed, and full urban -level services are available to each site in the inventory.

Specifically, water and sewer service are available for all the sites included in the inventory. The City's water and sewer master plans show that there is adequate capacity for services to housing estimated under the City's current land use policy but will most likely necessitate adjustments to the City's infrastructure system to accommodate housing capacity increases that will occur as part of Housing Element implementation.

The City of Downey is a water retailer and provides water supply for domestic, irrigation and fire protection uses. The water service area is approximately 12.2squmne miles and covers approximately 98 percent of the land within the City's municipal boundaries. The remaining portions of the City, including the area that lies east of the San Gabriel River, south of|-5,and north of Cecilia Avenue, are currently served by other water purveyors. The City provides water service to an area with a current population of approximately 112,400. The City's 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) projected population of approximately 127,300 by 2040. Projected populations in the City's service area were based on projections obtained from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The SCAG data incorporates demographic trends, existing land use,

general plan land use policies, and input and projections from the Department of Finance (DOF) and the US Census Bureau. In 2015, the City's Water demand was 15,030 acre-feet per year (AFY), of which 1lQ0OAFYwas used by residential uses. The 2015 UVVW1P projected water use estimates a total demand of approximately 19,529 AFY by 2040, representing an increase of 29 percent. Primary demand would continue to occur from residential uses throughout the City. Accordingly, necessary improvements to water conveyance infrastructure would be planned through Capital Improvement Programs and development fees. Based oncurrent groundwater management practices inthe Central Basin, the reliability of supplemental water purchased from CBMWD for emergency use, and water conservation efforts from customers,
dry year ormultiple dry year scenarios donot compromise the [it/sability toprovide a reliable supp|yofwater tnits customers. Additionally, recycled water facilities would be expanded through the planning horizon to meet demands for non -potable water.

The City owns, operates and maintains asanitary sewer system that serves the City ofDowney. The City's sewers discharge to trunk sewers owned, operated, and maintained by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (CSDLAQ which also provides for the treatment and disposal of the City's wastewater. The City of Downey (City) is located within the jurisdictional boundaries of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 18. The Los Angeles County Sanitation District owns, operates, and maintains the large trunk sewers that form the backbone of the regional wastewater conveyance system. Local collector and/or lateral sewer lines are the responsibility of the jurisdiction in which they are located. As ef2OZ1,the Los Angeles County Sanitation District has stated that there are presently no deficiencies that exist in Districts' facilities that serve the City. The Cit/sportion ofthe sewer system consists of approximately 193 miles of sanitary sewer mains, 4,250 manholes, and two small lift stations. The majority of the system was built between 1945 and 1955, with the oldest sewers dating back to 1927. As part of the 2010 Master Plan, the City selected gravity sewers for inspection, with the target ofinspecting 58,OUUfeet ofpipe, approximately 5 percent ofthe [ity'ssewer system.

The sewers selected for inspection included sewers of all ages and located throughout the City. The results of these inspections were extrapolated to characterize the overall condition of the system to allow for a reasonable initial projection of future repair, rehabilitation, and replacement needs. The Master Plan also included a system evaluation that found that all the City -owned sewers meet the capacity criteria established in this study (i.e., depth of flow less than or equal to 75 percent of pipe diameter) under both existing and build -out dry weather flow conditions. While the study found that no capital improvement projects by the City are required to provide additional capacity, the study does not account for the increased capacity proposed inthis Housing Element.

Toensure that infrastructure needs ofspecific projects are addressed, the City requires that project applications for new development be reviewed for adequate infrastructure. Applications are evaluated on a case -by -case basis to ensure the capacity exists to service new developments. The Downey Vision 2825 General Plan plans for a residential "build out" of36,91S units and a maximum population of 121,063 residents. The estimated increased in the number of potential residential units in the City because ofHousing Bement implementation is not included inthe currently available infrastructure plans. To accommodate the 2021-2029 RHNA of over 6,500 residential units, within three years of adopting this Housing Element, the City will undertake a series of land use actions to increase development potential. These proposed land use actions will require thorough infrastructure and environmental review and any additional constraints will be identified at the time the actions are taken, along with any necessary mitigation measures to address infrastructure system and service provision.

Environmental Constraints

Available data from the California Department of Conservation (California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application or "EQ Zapp" accessed on November 12, 2021) indicates there are no identified Alquist Priolo fault traces or fault zones in Downey. Seismic Hazard Zone Maps from the California Department of Conservation indicate that the City is in an area where liquefaction may occur during a strong earthquake. The identified area spans a large portion of Los Angeles and Orange and is not limited to just the City ofDowney. The City ispredominantly flat and lacks any substantial topographical variations.

There are no identified landslide areas in the City of Downey. None of the parcels identified in the residential sites inventory are constrained by sensitive habitat or contamination that would prohibit developers from building. The sites inventory does not include industrial properties as such constraints due to soil contamination is not a factor. The vacant sites identified in the land survey are infill sites and are flat and generally rectangular in shape. As a result, no major grading would be required on these parcels. The underutilized sites are in0Ucommercial sites with potential to redevelop with residential uses. Available data from the California Department ufForestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) shows that there are no Fire Hazard Severity areas in Downey and the City is not on the Agency's list of high- riskoommunideawith wi|d|and'mrban interfaces. No properties within the City are considered by FEyNA to be within a 100-year flood zone. Therefore, no impacts associated with flood hazards, tsunami, or seiche would occur. The City requires engineering reports to establish appropriate design standards and mitigation measures taken toalleviate any identified hazards. However, the necessity ofthese reports io offset by the need for public safety and welfare, and thus the City does not consider the reports a constraint to housing development.

A variety of potential funding sources are available to finance housing activities in Downey. Due to both the high cost ufdeveloping and preserving housing, and limitations onboth the amount and uses of funds, layering of funding sources may be required for affordable housing programs and projects.

The City participates inHUD federal funding programs andreoeiveo[DBGandHOPNEfunds6nnnHUDun a formula basis each year and in turn, awards, grants, and loans to nonprofit and public organizations for programs and projects infurtherance ofHousing Element goals and policies. The CDBGand HOME programs generally provide for a wide range of eligible activities for the benefit of low- and moderate- incomeveoidents.Forthe2D2U'2O2lpro0ramyemr, the City received $1,Dg4,6DOofCD8Gfunds and $457,821 of HOME funds. When combined with $170,575 in estimated HOME program income generated during the prior program year, the 2020-2021 Action Plan allocates $1,094,600 of CDBG funds and $628,396 of HOME funds to the following program activities, to be implemented from July 1, 2020 toJune 3O,JOZ1.
• In partnership with housing developers, the City will leverage HOME and CDBG funds to support the development or creation of affordable housing opportunities for home buyers, with units affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of Area Median Income, including units for individuals, families, persons with special needs, and persons experiencing homelessness or at -risk ofhomelessness.
• Using CDBG and HOME funds, the City will continue to provide a Residential Rehabilitation Program for existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate -income households.

The City will continue to use CDBG funds to affirmatively further fair housing choice through by funding fair housing education, counseling, antidiscrimination, and landlord -tenant mediation services.

As a City with substantial housing and community development needs, Downey leverages its CDBG and HOME entitlement grants with a variety of funding resources including but not limited to those listed below 1emaximize the effectiveness ofavailable funds.
^^ State Low-income Housing Tax Credit Program
w^ Building Equity and Growth inNeighborhoods Program (BEG|N) m Ca|HomeProQram
.° Multifamily Housing Program (K8HP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• [a|HEASingle and Multi -Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
• Los Angeles County Continuum ofCare (Co[)
• Housing Authority ofCounty ofLos Angeles County (HA[oLA) * Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
m Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Community Reinvestment Act Programs
•^ United Way Funding
• Private Contributions
The City has also received funding from the State of California Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP)for planning activities that accelerate housing production. LEAP provides one-time grant funding to cities and counties to update their planning documents and implement process improvements that will facilitate the acceleration of housing production and help local governments prepare for their sixth cycle housing elements.

Several resources from the County of Los Angeles are available to the Downey community. The federally funded Housing Choice Voucher program (formerly Section 8) is overseen by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (L4[DA) and provides rental assistance payments to owners of private market rate units on behalf of low-income tenants. LACDA also oversees the First Home Mortgage Program, which is open to all Los Angeles County residents (outside of the City of Los Angeles). The Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program provides federal tax credit for low- and moderate- income homebuyers who have not owned a home in the past three years. Allocation for MCC is provided by the State and administered bythe County ofLos Angeles.

Agencies with administrative capacity to implement programs contained in the Housing Element include the City of Downey and local and regional non-profit private developers. The Planning Division within

the Community Development Department takes the lead to implement Housing Element programs and policies. The Division is responsible for implementing the General Plan by ensuring that development projects are consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance, and State codes. The City also works closely with non-profit developers to expand affordable housing opportunities in Downey. In 2016, the City and Habitat for Humanity of Greater Los Angeles (Habitat LA) partnered on development -1_56�- 2,41'4 2 with assista nce f ro m the Cit,,;ir_d_e�veIoQed Downey View, a 50-unit affordable housing complex.

CHAPTER 5:
2014-2019 HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMEN4
program
review its Housing Element as frequently as appropriate and evaluate:

The appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in contributing to the attainment of the state housing goal
The effectiveness of the Housing Element in attainment of the community's housing goals and objectives
Progress in implementation of the Housing Element
This evaluation provides critical information unthe extent tnwhich programs haveschiexedstated continue to be relevant tnaddressing current and future objem1ivesandwhetherthesepmo�namsmn nue
housing needs in Downey. The evaluation provides the basis for recommended modifications to policies and programs and the establishment ofnew houoinBobjec1k/es.

Through program implementation during the 2014-2021 planning period, the City of Downey has made considerable progress in addressing the housing needs of the special populations. Lower income households have been assisted through the Housing Rebate and Grant Program which offers grants to promote the improvement, rehabilitation and/or the preservation of housing units occupied by low- to moderate -income households. In June of 2020, Downey launched a COVID Rental Assistance Program to cover one month of rental payments for income -eligible households. In March of 2021, Downey began to offer assistance for up to three months. The City also offers the Housing Rehabilitation and Assistance program to assist disabled households with architectural modifications to their homes and continue to ' |i tmp|enneottheprovisinnsoftheAmehcansw�hQ�abi\�iesAc (ADA).Hmweve�noapp applications have been submitted recently. The City also made moderate progress in expanding housing opportunities. In 2014 the Downey View development, with 50 affordable units, was built. Downey View replaced an outdated telephone service building with an urban-infill, transit -oriented development. Four (4) units were designated to those individuals who experience a physical or sensory disability. Through its HUD- fundedgrantpno8nam,theCitywasab|etoprovidepub|icaen/icesdesi0nedtoprov\deres\dentsvvkh special needs including, but not limited to, those concerned with mental disabilities, physical disabilities, developmental disabilities, and other conditions as well as seniors. For 2020-2021 the City provided $8S,00infunding tothree organizations that assist the elderly and those with special needs.

q to
[he Whole Child, a non-profit organization that assists with homeless assistance and prevention programs. In 2018, the City adopted a Plan to Prevent and Combat Homelessness, which outline the City's priorities as it continues to address issues related to homelessness. While programs efforts to Pralh.� favorable the Cit�_�,'s efforts to address the needs of suecial needs groups are hindered by limited funding.

The Department of Housing and Community Development determined that the Downey 2014-2021 table, the quantified objective performance is summarized.

PROGRAM 1: CODE ENFORCEMENT --�
Continue tuconduct inspections unacomplaint basis
through the Cit/sCode Enforcement Division.

PROGRAM 2: HOUSING REBATE AND GRANT PROGRAM
Address property, structural, and energy/water
conservation improvements for low-income homeowners
inthe City. The City anticipates that lO projects will be assisted annually based onfunding availability.

PROGRAM 3: MONITOR AND PRESERVE AFFORDABLE

HOUSING
City staff will maintain a list of affordable units
to preserve affordable units. The Housing Division will continue to pursue partnership opportunities with non-
profits to preserve and expand affordable housing in the action in years 2014 to 2016. From 2018 to 2019, the City changed the program assessment metric to code
enforcement cases filed. For 2018 and 2019, there were a filed. In 2020, 5,768
code enforcement cases were filed. These cases typically involve required maintenance of a property or illegal
construction within the residential zoning districts.

Residents are encouraged to apply for rehabilitation
assistance when the case is applicable.

Continued Appropriateness:

Property maintenance is an important City goal. This
total of 120 grants of up to a range of $10,000 to $35,000 each (total of more than $1.78 million in funds), toward moderate -income households, far more than the 80
expected over the element period.

Continued Appropriateness:

The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan listed the Residential
Rehabilitation Program as key Housing Preservation
with updated objectives that will be consistent with the latest Consolidated Plan.

An inventory of the City's affordable housing units is kept and maintained by the Community Development
Department. The City partnered with Habitat for Humanity multi -family residential developments at risk during this during the housing cycle which have since lost their
affordability covenants.

Maintain and distribute literature on energy
and subsidies available from utility companies, and
encourage homeowners and landlords to incorporate
these features into construction and remodel i ng-projects.

Encourage ener conservation devices, including but not
limited to lighting, water heater treatments, and solar energy systems for all residential projects. Encourage
maximum utilization of Federal, State, and local
government programs, such as the County of Los Angeles
Home Weatherization Program, that assist homeowners
in providing energy conservation measures. Continue to
provide information on home loan programs available
through the City and encourage residents to use the
to implement enerRv efficient
PROGRAM 5: HOUSING OPPORTUNITY SITES
Staff will continue to facilitate the redevelopment of
the development community through an updated
inventory available throughout the 2014-2021 planning
qtcle. Provide information to interested develooers and on the City's website about potential residential
opportunity sites.
6: SECOND UNIT ZONING
Based on firevious plannin eriods. it is reasonable a
JA "t
planning period, therefore. Throughout the planning
�V- mai
was 202. The current Consolidated Plan (2020-2024)
commits CDBG/HCME funds to develop four affordable
rental units and rehabilitate 100 existing units. Continued education is provided to property owners to maintain
compliance with deed restrictions. Standards, benefits, and incentives related to affordable housing are also shared with any persons interested in the construction of a
residential development.

Continued Appropriateness:

Preservation of affordable housing is an important goal for the City. An updated version of this program will be
included in the Housing Element and will include details based on an updated riskanaysis.

The program is ongoing. The City offers all development applications within single-family residential zones the incentive of increasing floor -area ratio (FAR) by an
a4,&4,T-rErPt._5y11 #rr
elements. This bonus was used once in 2019 and once in
(see Program 2) made energy efficiency improvements to
their properties.

Continued Appropriateness:
66, - M-1
The City continues to encourage and advocate for the
construction/redevelopment of underutilized parcels as an ongoing effort. The City worked to increase densities at sevet sites dtx4g tWis Wok.tsi-ig Elenei.t cycla,;!#1dot?l of 57 units. At least one identified opportunity site within Downtown Specific Plan area was developed; information
website.

Continued Appropriateness:

The 2021 Housing Element will include an updated
sites inventory. A revised version of this program will remain in the Housing Element. I
In 2018 and 2019, the City updated its second unit
aandards to com with statewide ADU reilulations, which
rdngle-family residence in residential zone districts. The City �xAectef. 2 ticul *f 9, t* 11 AlUs4yriAg t�e eAtire elemeAt -ceri&; Argtiv& a tgtal of 19 JW_L1rojects fritu 2018 to

,he potential to construct second units though updated
handouts and information on the City's website.

PROGRAM 7: SENIOR HOUSING ZONING
that are favorable to senior residents. Throughout the
planning period, the City will inform eligible property owners of the incentives to develop senior housing
website.
2019). In 2020, a total of 53 ADLIs were approved, and 134J applications were submitted. Those that have not been
approved are anticipated to be issued sometime in 2021. property owners. Currently, the City provides information handouts at the public counter. The State released ADU
design guidelines that staff provides to the public at the counter and on the City's website. I
Continued Appropriateness:
"V
development (previously known as second units), the City can adopt a revised ADLI ordinance or apply standards
established under State law. This program is an important component of the City's affordable housing strategy and will remain in the H;#Y.sing Element veit� strengtXe;k-%t ?.Cti41A54F p I ro(mbte clavelopmOnt of ADUs consistent with State law.

The City continues to encourage and advocate for senior hity.sing d.eyelt;tment. T�e City *Kers incentives iA tXe f-#)rm- of reduced parking, lower minimum unit sizes, increases in heights and allowed stories, and increased lot coverage. The _?Y+,3UZ4 4VrsA%X_-_?_W
developments, and a density bonus is available.

Continued Appropriateness:

This program is an important component of the City's
affordable housing strategy and will remain in the Housing Element either as a stand-alone program or as part of a of special needs housing.

PROGRAM 8: MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE The City of Downey continues to provide information to Continue participation and distribute fliers and advertise residents and members of the public who may be interested program availability. in the program and assists individuals in ocating Los Angeles County Housing Authority's offices and website. 1 6 - . 0 . a I -
Continued Appropriateness:

Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). MCC
an important resource for low- and moderate -income first time home buyers and will remain in the Housing Element with updated objectives for continued coordination with LACDA.
.,-ROGRAM 9: SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE 2020 records show 455 total units within the City Continue to provide assistance to households through &t411A44V-Y-4X�iC--X�_ continued participation in the Section 8 program and There were 630 vouchers used in Downey in 2016.

encourage rental property owners turegister their units with the Housing Authority. The Housing Division will
continue tumonitor the number ofresidents accessing
the program and units available for rent.

PROGRAM 10: LOS ANGELES COUNTY PARTNERSHIP
Increase resident awareness about housing programs
offered bythe County byadvertising them onthe City's
vvebsiteand byoffering Staff assistance atCity Hall.
#n an annual basis, the City will review development
standards, to ensure that the development of lower
to address all constraints identified in Section 5 of the Housing Element. Staff will continue to use flexible
affordable housing through promotion of maximum
development densities.

PROGRAM 12: DENSITY BONUS
inform and encourage developers to utilize the density
HE
In June of 2020, Downey launched a COVID Rental
Assistance Program--$500,000 budget, 457 tenant
of 2021, Downey began to offer assistance for up to three Continued Appropriateness:

The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher is operated by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). The
affordable housing resource for City residents and will remain in the Housing Element with updated objectives for preservation of vouchers and continued coordination with information regarding County -sponsored housing
Continued Appropriateness:
that can supplement the City's current housing programs.

The partnership will remain a program with updated
objectives for continued coordination with LA County
The City was not able to make substantial updates or
staffing and funding constraints. Recently however,
Residential Design Guidelines have been developed to
residential development.

The City is in the process of updating ADU standards and units per lot. While no applications for residential
Downtown Specific Plan has helped facilitate large
residential development in the past and preliminary
proposals have been discussed for the near future.

Continued Appropriateness:
and this program will remain in the Housing Element with of the Housing Element.

The City continues to provide density bonus as a resource for new developments. The City offers developers density increases of 35 percent plus development incentives for

PROGRAM 13: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS
Continue to encourage Planned Unit Developments to
provide affordable housing through creative land use
-W..k.)-iques. inform develogers of the density incentives under the program.

PROGRAM 14: STREAMLINE PROCESSING
Continue to monitor permit processing times and
investigate ways to streamline the process. Continue to digitize information including building permits and the Zoning Code.
contain at least 20 percent units for low-incomLe
for
h.s,useholds or at least five vercent reserved for ver lo -�Mvr t wk-
2020 and no clatil
are available about previous years. I
The City will update its ordinance to remain in compliance with Government Code §65915, and to meet the revised
standards in recent State legislation which include more relaxed thresholds and higher bonus percentages.
1 0 4 1 . I �
JE@161010,&T4�01 11FINSISTAM01,1112 6 . 1. . go -
Continued Appropriateness:
-M,
NOT :19MMIJI 36,111 Fluallille -
F
No PUDs were proposed in the City during 2018, 2019, and 2020.
once staff reviews the current code section.

The program remains a tool within the Downey Municipal
(potentially affordable) creative residential development projects.

Continued Appropriateness:

The City of Downey diligently complies with all applicable streamlining policies and practices. In 2018, the City
digitized resources including archived building permits and planning entitlements to further streamline permit
processing and reduce the amount of time it takes to
ctnIvct Alr*Aerty researc�. �,z , �,X e
City's permitting software to ensure accurate information and speedier service.
i "2021 for a more streamlined plan check review.

PROGRAM 15: PRIORITIZE HOUSING PROGRAM

ACTIVITIES
Identify housing needs and prioritize housing program
the City's Consolidated Plan.

Continue to conduct annual reviews of !1-1- �nnin and
�evelopment fees.
=ME=
sewer providers for their review and input.

PROGRAM 18: FLOOD MANAGEMENT
use decisions.

If larger project streamlining program that will also address new streamlining requirements under SB 35,
The City's Housing Rehabilitation Assistance Program has been identified by the Community Development
Department as an ongoing priority program based upon
annual needs assessments and the City's previous and
current Consolidated Plans. The City allocated
support rehabilitation of 20 low- to moderate -income
- - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . .

Continued Appropriateness:

Mae-,
longer needed and will be removed.

Annual reviews of fees are necessary and are a preferred timeline in the City of Downey. Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments are made at the beginning of every fiscal year.

Changes to planning and development fees were made to
recover cost for services, yet total cost for service remains high r than the applicable fee. City fees remain aggmprLAe_ iij._iiijig iii1i j�.jguni�ipg cotittunities. I
2019. Changes were made to recover cost for services, yet Wek-m—
Change in fees remains appropriate and consistent with
surrounding communities.

Continued Appropriateness:

Maintaining an appropriate ee structure is important to balancing the need to recover cost for services but not ... ......... Thl
"IAM40" -aniffilevel — W9UXT#W5W
WdLer and sewer providers consistent with the
requirements of State law.

Continued Appropriateness:
remain in the updated Housing Element.

Assessments regarding flood risks are ongoing. City staff development application.

RM2117119ro ITIOTIM nfzm�

PROGRAM 19:LOT CONSOLIDATION
Encourage lot consolidation ofsmaller parcels to
accommodate projects including o minimum ufl6units
atadensity ufetleast 3Udwelling units per acre or
higher.

PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
modifications to their homes and continue toimplement
the provisions ofthe Americans with 0isabi|itiesAct
(ADA).Pmvideinformation inpublic places �gerdingthe
Chysreasonable accommodation ordinance that expands
upon the provisions ofthe Housing Rebate and Grant
Program and make information onthis program more
widely available to residents. If necessary, implement
reasonable accommodate ;procedures within one year._�
Continue toassist households through the Fair Housing
Foundation and continue torefer fwirhousingcomp|aints
to the Fair Housing Foundation.

Flooding is addressed in the General Plan Safety Element; to avoid �duplication, this program will be removed,
The City continues to encourage lot consolidation; however, no lots were consolidated within the City during this
planning period.

Continued Appropriateness:
objective will remain in the Housing Element either as a The City currently does not have a reasonable
accommodation ordinance. As part of the last Housing
Element cycle, staff is working on forming the ordinance.

Adoption of the ordinance is anticipated for 2021.

Continued Appropriateness:

The City continues to contract with the Fair Ho using
Foundation (FHF), which serves 250 Downey residents per year, providing services including tenant and landlord
Continued Appropriateness:

Fair housing is an important issue to the City, and an
expanded version of the program will remain in the Housing Element consistent with new State laws requiring cities to Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AB 686, 2018).
2021 Housing Element, including progress meeting the City's fifth cycle RHNA. Through December of 2020, 39 percent of the total units in the RHNA allocation (or 466 of 1,201 units) were built. However, this is mostly due to development of moderate- and above -moderate units. No very low- or extremely low-income units were built so far during this period.
111

The conservation goal was to preserve four at -risk ownership units. Those ownership units are no longM affordable, but none of the City's stock of affordable multi -family housing converted to market rate housing during the planning period. I
Progress [Total units] _
�rogress [Percent of Construc
Progress [Percent ofCombined
Total Construction and RHNA
(a) Construction objectives represent the number of units the City realistically expects might be constructed within the planning period, as opposed to the "units accommodated by opportunity sites" which includes the City's remaining RHNA. (b) Any CDBG funding received during the planning period will be used to fund projects that improve and maintain the quality of the City's housing stock and residential infrastructure. The rehabilitation objective is consistent with the City's Housing Plan. (c) The conservation/ preservation objective is consistent with the City's total count of affordable units that are permanent but could potentially be at -risk units including 4 at risk ownership uniM (d) The units included in the table as assisted through programs includes 10 households assisted annually through the Housing Rebate and Grant Program. The number of units was estimated by income category based on past utilization of the program, *RHNA total represents number of units needed to accommodate shortfall from previous HE Cycle, since Downey did not make available adequate sites to accommodate the Fourth Cycle RHNA (2008-2014).

Source: City of Downey 2014-2021 Housing Element, page 40; Housing ElementAnnual Reports, 2014 to 2020

This page left intentionally blank.

This Housing Plan's goals, policies, and programs have been established to address housing issues in enduring obiective is to facilitate and
encourage safe, decent housing that fulfills the diverse needs of current and future residents. To 1kn identifies long-term housing goals and shorter -term oliciesand programs to address identified housing needs, constraints to development confronting the City, and housing needs assessment (Chapter 2) , housing constraints analysis (Chapter 3), housing resources analysis (Chapter 4), and the review of program accomplishments for the previous (2014-2021) Housing Element (Chapter 5).

To make adequate provision for the housing needs of people of all income levels, State law (Government Code 65583[c]) requires that the City, at a minimum, identify programs that do all the • Identify adequate sites, with appropriate zoning and development standards and services tu accommodate the locality's share of the regional housing needs for each income level. • Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very |ow- |ovv',and moderate -income households.
* Address and, where possible, remove governmental constraints tothe maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for people at all income levels, as well ashousing for people with disabilities.
• Conserve and improve the condition ofthe existing affordable housing stock and preserve assisted housing developments atrisk ofconversion tomarket-rate housing. • Promote equal housing opportunities for all people, regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability.

The programs below identify the actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate land use and development standards, and with services and facilities to accommodate the City's share of regional housing need for each income level. The programs also address identified housing issues in Downey and approaches to meet State law housing requirements.

Programs generally include a statement of specific City action(s) necessary to implement a policy or goal and identify the City department or other agency responsible for implementation, the quantified objectives (where applicable), and a timeframe for completion. A summary of quantified objectives is included following the program descriptions.

This Housing Plan focuses on goals, polices, and programs that can realistically be accomplished based on current funding and staffing levels. This does not preclude the City from undertaking additional program actions not included in this Plan if they are consistent with the goals and policies set here and throughout the General Plan.

Policy 1.1 Accommodate a variety of housing types to meet the needs of all residents.

Policy 12 Encourage and facilitate a range of housing to accommodate the City's share of regional housing and special housing needs.

Policy 1.3 implement land use policies and standards that allow for a range of residential densities and housing types that will enable households ofall types and income levels opportunities tofind suitable ownership and rental housing inthe City.

Policy 1/4 Encourage the development of residential units and the provision of related services for special needs groups, including the elderly, large households, single parents, persons with disabilities, extremely low-income persons, and persons experiencing homelessness.

Policy 1.5 Encourage infill development and recycling of land to provide adequate residential sites.

Policy 1.6 Support the assembly of small vacant or underutilized parcels to enhance the feasibility ofinfi||development.

Policy 17 Facilitate the development of accessory dwelling units on single-family properties citywide.

Po|icyZ.1 Facilitate housing development of affordable to lower -income households by providing technical assistance, regulatory incentives and concessions, and financial resources as funding permits.

Po|icyl2 Encourage the inclusion of housing affordable to lower -income households when reviewing proposals for new housing developments

Po|icyI3 Encourage and provide incentives for both the private and public sectors tn produce or assist in the production of affordable housing, with emphasis on housing affordable to persons with disabilities, seniors, large families, female -headed households with children, and people experiencing homelessness.

Policy 24 Asfunding allows, provide rental assistance toaddress existing housing problems and support regional programs to assist prospective homebuyers.

Policy 2.5 Support regional efforts to develop affordable housing and address homelessness.

Goal 3. Address and where legally possible, remove governmental constraints tothe maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities.

Pn|icyS.1 Review and adjust residential development standards, regulations, ordinances, departmental processing procedures, and residential fees related to rehabilitation and construction that are determined toconstrain housing development.

Policy 3.2 Utilize density bonuses, fee reductions, or other regulatory incentives, as available and appropriate, tominimize the effect ofgovernmental constraints.

Policy 3.3 Monitor State and federal housing -related legislation, and update City plans, ordinances and processes asappropriate turemove orreduce governmental constraints.
po|icyl4 Facilitate coordination between lending institutions, the real estate and development community, and the City tobetter understand and address non -governmental constraints and facilitate production of affordable housing.

Po|icy3.S Eliminate zoning and other regulatory barriers tothe placement and operation of housing facilities for the homeless and special needs populations in appropriate locations h h the City.
_
Goal 4. Conserve and improve the conditions of neighborhoods and existing housing, especially affordable housing.

Policy 4.1 Assist in the conservation and preservation of all affordable housing units, including mobile home parks and govern ment-su bsiclized housing, and especially those at risk of converting to market rate housing.

Po|icy4.Z Promote the repair, revitalization, and rehabilitation of residential structures which have fallen into disrepair.

Policy 4.8 Leverage State and federal loans and grants to assist in preserving existing housing and rehabilitating unsound housing structures.

Policy 4.5 Encourage energy conservation and sustainable building measures in new and existing homes.

Policy 4.6 Encourage development and long-range planning that uses compact urban forms that foster connectivity, walkability, and use of alternative transportation modes.

Goal S. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community for all. I
Policy 5.1 Affirmatively further fair housing related to the sale, rental, and financing of housing to avoid discrimination based on race, religion, age, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, or any other arbitrary factor.

Policy 5.2 Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing options throughout the community for all persons.

Policy 5.3 Assist in the enforcement of fair housing laws by providing support to organizations that can receive and investigate fair housing allegations, monitor compliance with fair housing laws, and refer possible violations to enforcing agencies.

Policy 5.4 Ensure that persons with disabilities have adequate access to housin3 Policy 5.5 Facilitate increased participation among traditionally underrepresented groups in the public decision -making process.

Policy 5.6 Provide outreach and education for the broader community of residents, residential property owners and operators regarding fair housing practices and requirements, implementing Programs
The programs below identify the actions that will be taken to address identified housing need and issues in Downey and approaches to meet state law housing requirements. Program numbers reference corresponding goals listed above.
credits for permitted or approved units are taken into consideration. The City can meet just under half (46 percent) of the RHNA with approved and proposed projects, projected ADU development, and on vacant and underutilized land for two residential designations and within the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area. The identified RHNA shortfall is 3,510 units. To address the shortfall, the City has identified various sites that, while appropriate for redevelopment and intensification, require General

Plan amendments, zone changes, and the addition ofresidential overlays tofacilitate residential development. Once appropriate land use and zoning actions are taken, the City can adequately accommodate the remaining RH0A.

Site Rezoning
The RHWAshortfall tobeaddressed for the 2OZ1'2O29planning period is7g4units inthe very low- income cate8nq\433unksinthe|uw'incnmeoategoq\7U6unitsinthemodenate'incomeoate0ory,and 1,587 in the above moderate -income category. The City will make available sites to accommodate the RH0Ashortfall by:
• Completing General Plan and Zoning Code amendments to increase the allowable residential density in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) General Plan designation and R-3 zone from 18-24 units per acre to 18-40 units per acre. The sites inventory includes 24.5 acres of MDR/R-3 sues.
• Completing a land use and zone change to APN 6232-020-004 from Low Density Residential/R-I toHigh Density Residenda|/R'I
• Adopt an implementing zone and development standards for the Mixed -Use General Plan designation that will allow residential development at a density of at least 30 units per acre. The sites inventory includes 778acres ofmixed-use sites.
• Adopt a residential overlay zone that will allow high -density housing development at a density of at least 30 units per acre along key City corridors and allows residential development as a by - right use. The overlay zone will apply to non -industrial, non-R-1 zoned properties located in key areas of six key commercial corridors identified on Figure 4.2 (Residential Overlay Zone) as well as one stand-alone property (APN 6283-001-035).While the overlay applies to non -industrial, non-R-1 zoned properties located in key areas of six key commercial corridors identified on Figure 4.2 (Residential Overlay Zone), specific sites totaling 49.4 acres have been chosen for the Housing Element consistent with State law.
• Add a residential component to three key specific plan areas with densities of at least 30 units per acre. The residential component will be implemented by a residential or mixed -use overlay or by amending or rescinding the governing specific plans. The sites inventory includes three non-residential specific plans.

The 784very low- income and the 433low-income RHNAshortfall units are subject tuthe requirements ofGovernment Code 6S58]2(h)and (i)). Consistent with the requirements ofGovernment Code 65583.2(h) and (i), the sites rezoned will allow owner -occupied and rental multifamily residential uses "by'right"for developments inwhich a1least 2Opercent ofthe units are affordable tolower income households. The sites will have capacity for at least 16 units per site at a density of at least 20 units per acre and at least half of the very low- and low-income housing need will be accommodated on sites designated for residential use and for which nonresidential uses ormixed'uses are not permitted.

The sites inventory shows that not enough identified capacity exists on sites designated exclusively for residential use. Thus, the very low- and low-income RHNA shortfall will be accommodated on sites designated for mixed use, with land use regulations that allow stand-alone residential uses and require that at least 50 percent of the total floor area of mixed -use projects have a residential use.

The amendments and rezoning will be completed within three years of Housing Element adoption. Sites to be rezoned, listed in the sites inventory table in the appendix, have an identified total realistic capacity for 4,3O9units (exceeding the RHNAshortfoU).

The City will continue to facilitate redevelopment of underutilized sites through outreach methods to the development community by providing on the City's website an updated inventory available throughout the 3U22'lQ%9planning cycle. This information will 6eavailable tointerested developers as residential opportunity sites. The City will continue to track the affordability of new housing projects and progress toward meeting the Ck\/s RHNA.

The City of Downey is not responsible for the actual construction of housing units. The City is, however, responsible for creating a regulatory environment in which the private market could build these units.

This includes the creation, adoption, and implementation of General Plan policies, zoning, and development standards, and/or incentives to encourage the construction of various types of units.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time) and application fees Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division T?mveƒramne/ Rezoning actions within three years ofHousing Element adoption; ongoing implementation and annual assessment ofstatus oƒhousing sites inventory os part o/the annual reporting process
Government Code Section 65Q63stipulates that ajurisdiction must ensure that its Housing Element inventory can accommodate its share of the RHNA by income level throughout the planning period. If a jurisdiction approves a housing project at a lower density or with fewer units by income category than identified in the Housing Element, it must quantify at the time of approval the remaining unmet housing need at each income level and determine whether there is sufficient capacity to meet that need. If not, thecity or county must "identify and make available" additional adequate sites to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of housing need by income level within 180 days of approving the reduced -density project.

The City will evaluate residential development proposals for consistency with goals and policies of the General Plan and the 2021-2029 Housing Element sites inventory and make written findings that the density reduction is consistent with the General Plan and that the remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the RHNA by income level. if a proposed reduction of residential density will result in the residential sites inventory failing to accommodate the RHNA by income level, the City will identify and make available additional adequate sites to accommodate its share of housing need by income level within 180 days of approving the reduced density project.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time) and application fees Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division T7m/eƒroone/ Ongoing; as part of the entitlement review process, evaluate new projectsfor consistency with General Plan objectives osthey relate tohousing and RHNA obligations
m Amend the General Plan Land Use Element to: 1) establish the Medium Density Residential designation density range ot10.O1o4O.0units per acre, 2)establish anew Residential Overlay designation with aminimum density ofatleast 3Dunits per acre, and 3)ensure land use policy

discussion reflects these two changes and direction to allow housing along specified corridors and within specified specific plan areas.
� |nthe Zoning Code and/or Specific Plans:
o Amend regulations for the Medium Density (R-3) zone to allow up to 40 units per acre and adjust development standards accordingly.
o Amend the Zoning Code to include a Residential Overlay that allows a minimum density of3Ounits per acre and allows residential development asaby-right use. Apply the Residential Overlay to all non -industrial properties located along commercial corridors identified inthe sites inventory.
o Amend the Stonewood Center, Downey Landing, and Florence/1-5 Specific Plans to allow housing at a density of at least 30 units per acre on properties identified in the sites inventory. For sites that are identified to meet the very low- and low-income RHNA shortfall, development standards in the Specific Plans will allow stand-alone residential uses and require that 50 percent of the total floor area of mixed -use projects have a residential use. Asanoption toamending the Specific Plans, the City may consider rescinding one or more of the plans and applying the appropriate residential zones or overlays tnsites identified inthe sites inventory needed tomeet the RHWAsho�faU. o Create anew zone and development standards tuimplement theGeneral Plan Mixed - Use desi8nadon.Adoptstandardstha1aMowforaminimumdensityofat|east 30units per acre, including parking. For sites that are identified tomeet the very low- and low- income RH0Ashortfa||,deve|opmentstandardsxviUaUuvvstand-a|onevesidentim|uaes and require that 50 percent of the total floor area of mixed -use projects have a residential use.
o To increase development opportunities, identify opportunities to apply the Mixed -Use zonetuother|ocadonsforfuturemixed'use/residentia|deve|opmen1,vxhi|econsiderin8 appropriate jobs/housing balance and fiscal impacts. Pursuant to AB 1397, amend the Zoning Ordinance to require by -right approval of housing development that include at least 20 percent of the units as housing affordable to lower -income households. These provisions will apply only to sites being used to meet the sixth cycle lower -income RHNA that were previously identified in the fourth and fifth cycle Housing Elements as housing sites. These "reuse" sites are specifically identified in the Housing Element appendix. o Identify and codify incentives to encourage development of residential uses in areas with the new Residential Overlay and Mixed -Use zone.
o Revise residential developments standards including minimum lot area requirements and building height limits in the R-3 zoning district and minimum unit sizes for all residential development.
o Update development standards for multi -family projects that will not require the Site Plan Review process and allow for this review to be completed administratively without discretionary approval.
• Resolve General Plan and Zoning Ordinance inconsistencies in residential land use designations. • Explore additional opportunities to expand residential development in the City, including, but Funding Source: General Fund
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Timefrarne: Ongoing, Update of General Plan and Zoning Regulations and adoption of densities in the MDRIR-3 designation, mixed -use standards, and residential

overlayformnidors and identified specific plan sites within three years 4f Housing Element adoption. Identification of additional mixed -use opportunity areas ospart ofoGeneral Plan update.

Promote the development of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by adopting an ADU ordinance that reflects current State law, including permit streamlining processes and fee assessment. Facilitate and encourage ADU development in Downey as follows:
• Create aprocess tobring unpennhtedADUsuptncode.
• Consider reducing development fees for ADUs.
* Create a one -stop assistance center for homeowners interested in developing an ADU. Establish a one -stop webpage on the City's website to serve as a repository for ADU information including developments standards and requirements, fee estimated, information on ADU development through the provisions ofSenate Bill ;.
* Implement, and provide to interested homeowners, state architect standard plans, when released, to support ADU development and streamline the plan check process for ADUs. * Continue the City's public outreach program to encourage ADU development, including advertising ADU development opportunities on the City's website, in local newspapers, in local utility bills, and at various community centers, including the public library. Establish ADU office hours every other month to allow for one-on-one help to interested homeowners on an appointment basis.
� Monitor ADUpermit applications, approvals, and affordability through the Housing Element Annual Progress Report process. Identify and implement additional incentives or other strategies, asappropriate, toensure adequate sites during the planning period. |fproduction falls below levels anticipated in the Housing Element, the City will evaluate and ensure that adequate sites are available through the adopted sites inventory, or it will identify additional sites to ensured continued provision of adequate sites.

Funding Source General Fund, State grants
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division and Building Division 7/meƒrmnve/ Adopt ordinance within two years o/Housing Element adoption; ongoing ADU development support; one -stop center and ADUoffice hours within one year; evaluation ofADUproduction: annually.

Quantified Objective: 930ADUxduring the planning period (this objective isosubset 4fand not /n addition tothe Quantified Objective for Program 1:Adequate Sites) Maintain an affordable housing density bonus ordinance that establishes procedures for obtaining and monitoring density bonuses in compliance with State law. Update the City's density bonus ordinance to remain in compliance with Government Code §65915. Enhance its applicability for the Downtown, Stonewood, Downey Landing, and Florence/1-5 Specific Plans. Consider providing additional incentives to developers to encourage use of the density bonus. Continue to promote the program and survey developers about interests in and constraints to using a density bonus. To show prospective developers the potential advantages of using the state's density bonus provisions, a detailed list of completed density bonus projects in Downey and in neighboring cities and a list of available concessions will be

compiled and shared with all new applicants inquiring about or submitting plans for multi -family developments.

General .-�^^ c7
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Tin/afnamme/ Adopt a density bonus ordinance within two years ipfHousing Element adoption; List of density bonus project examples within one ' year; Gauge developer interest and constraints: during pre -submittal meetings.

Quantified Objective: 34projects with density Jbonus units during the planning objective is osubset ofand not /naddition tnthe Quantified {biectave&forProgram 1:

Adequate Sites).

Study and, if shown to be appropriate for Downey, adopt an inclusionary housing ordinance and program. Asthe City studies its viability, itwill also determine and try 0mmitigate any constraints such onordinance might have unresidential development inthe City.

Funding Source: General 4�jnd ?��Vtrle)
Responsible Party: C6nimVnityDev&Jbpmmt DeportmerII Planning Divisioni City Council of Element adoption.

Continue to encourage Planned Unit Developments to provide affordable housing through creative development approaches. inform developers of the density incentives under the program. Review relevant Municipal Code provisions to make sure the program complies with State law.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Ongoing
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(3), require the replacement of units affordable to the same or lower income level as a condition of any development on a nonvacant site identified in the Housing Element consistent with those requirements set forth in Government Code section 65915(c)(3).

Replacement
residential uses, or within the past five years have had residential uses that have been vacated or demolished, and:
m Were subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable topersons and families oflow nrvery |ovv'inoomoe;or
w Subject to any other form of rent or price control through a public entity's valid exercise of its police power; or
• Oocupiedby|oxvorvery|uw+incomehouseho|dsFurthepurpnseofthisproAcam"previousfive years" isbased onthe date the application for development was submitted.

Pursuant toGovernment Code section 6638U(d)(Chapter 654 Statutes of2O19(SB 3SO)),the City shall not approve a housing development project that will require the demolition of residential dwelling units regardless of whether the parcel was listed in the inventory unless a) the project will create at least as many residential dwelling units as will be demolished, and b) certain affordability criteria are met.

Funding Source General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Timeframe: Ongoing
Provide housing opportunities tumeet the needs ofspecial needs residents— including seniors, residents with disabilities and developmental disabilities, large families, extremely low-income households, and those experiencing homelessness —by giving priority to development projects that include a component for special needs groups in addition to other lower -income households.

Expand incentives available to senior housing to all special needs housing types,including reduced parking standards and unit sizes, increased height allowances, and maximum lot coverage. Provide additional regulatory incentives and concessions to projects targeted for special needs groups.

Encouragedeve|opersmfsingle'tamilydwe||ingstoincurporateuniersa|designand/or"vishabi|ity" improvements.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget (staff time) and other sources, as available
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Tlmeframms: Ongoing; Establish olist ofregulatory ond/brfinoncio/incentives for special needs housing within one'yeoc
PROGRAM 2.2: HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Assist in meeting the housing needs for persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental disabilities, by implementing the following actions:
� Assist developers who seek State and Federal monies insupport ofhousing construction and rehabilitation targeted for persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental Provide regulatory incentives and concessions 10projects targeted for persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental disabilities.

Aupart ofthe land use policy changes, revise the permit and processing procedure for group homes for 7+ clients to ensure that these uses are treated objectively, do not discriminate against persons with disabilities, and provide approval certainty for housing for persons with Funding Source: Community Development Department budget Responsible Party., Community Development Department, Planning and Housing Divisions

T7nnefianne Support grant applications ot least once during the planning period, develop informational material within two years of Housing Element adoption, provide /ncenbvesfbrdevelopment ofhousing for persons with disabilities ononongoing basis; Permit processing procedure review as part of the land use updates to be completed within three years ofHousing Element adoption.

AsmoommunityapproaohinQfuUbu\ld'ou¢theCkyhasfewremainin0vaoantsites.Thereladvescarchy of vacant land necessitates the use of alternative mechanisms for providing sites for housing. In addition, the City has fiscal challenges to maintaining service levels. The City will use a toolkit of housing incentives programs to facilitate the construction of affordable and market rate housing products and will implement the following actions:
• Use Development Agreements to secure long-term fiscal and affordable housing benefits with a focus on development projects on City -owned property in the Downtown Downey Specific Plan area and atthe Downey Landing commercial center.
• Provide, when possible, developer incentives such as expedited permit processing and developer impact fee deferrals for units that are affordable tnlower-income households, including extremely low-income households.
• Use resources such as HUD Section 208/811 loans, HOPE 11 and III Homeownership program funds, HOME funds, CDBG funds, Low-income Housing Tax Credit Programs, and California Housing Finance Agency single-family and multi -family programs to stimulate private developer and non-profit entity efforts in the development and financing of housing for lower- and moderate'incomehousehuids.
• Facilitate discussions between developers and local banks to meet their obligations pursuant to the California Community Reinvestment Act (CCRA) providing favorable financing to developers involved in projects designed to provide lower and moderate -income housing opportunities.

Funding Source HUD, HOME, [o1HFA General Fund (staff time) Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning and Housing Divisions 77n/efrmmnec Ongoing; Establish olist ofregulatory ond/orfinondo/incentives for special needs housing within une'yeor.

Quantified Objective: Provide assistance and incentives to 4 special needs projects during the planning period; Development of2residential nrmixed-use projects with onaffordability components onCity-owned land.
w Provide pre -application temhnicaiassistanoe0maffordab|ehousinQprovideratndetennine project feasibility and address zoning and code compliance issues inthe most cost-effective and expeditious manner possible.
• Consult with local affordable housing developers, including offering letters of support for grant applications, advising on local zoning and code compliance, and facilitating partnerships. • Encourage multi -family housing development near transit routes. • Maintain a list of mortgage lenders participating in the California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) loan programs and refer the program to builders or corporations interested in developing housing inthe City.

m° Educate the community on the importance of equitable access for all residents and neighborhoods 10affordable housing and financial support Funding Source General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division T7meƒrume/ Ongoing; pre -application technical assistance to all residential development applicants that includes options, incentives, and resources (list of affordable housing developers and affordable housing financing ogencies/pnogoonns/or technical assistance for including affordable units /nthe project.

Quantified Objective: Assist 5affordable housing projects Continue to convene the Ad Hoc Committee for Affordable Housing, launched in 2021, to discuss housing affordability issues in Downey and explore concepts to be included in the General Plan and Zoning Code amendments, such as (but not limited to)inclusionary housing. Serve as an ongoing space for residents to share concerns and ideas related to affordable housing in the City.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, City Council Tirneframe: 2021 toJ02g
Quantified Objective: Meet quarterly throughout the planning period Continue tosupport 0rst'dme,low-and nmoderate'noomehomebuyersinDowneybyconnecdng interested residents and members of the public to the Mortgage Credit Certificate and First Home Mortgage programs, run by Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). Direct residents to the LACDAof0oes and vvebsite and review key eligibility requirements. Advertise and encourage interested 0ot{ime,|ow'inoomehomebuyersin8ovxneytoapp|yforthefedera|HumeOxvneohipProQram(HO9), financed with HOME funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Coordinate with Downey service providers and other community -based organizations to publicize housing assistance programs. Provide information on humsin8pno0ramsonthe Cit/sxxebsiteand via social media, through flyers posted at City facilities, and via staff assistance at City Hall.

Funding Source/ General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Housing Division TYnnefranme: 2021 to20JSYUpdate the Cit/'smebsdeUopost olist ofresources and regional agencies assisting first-time home buyers including eligibility requirements, provide the list ot Cityfac8/ties,onthe [ity'xsocial media pages, and to community organizations within one year.

Quantified Objective: Coordinate with the County toassist 25first time homebuyemduring the planning period.

Implement the City's Plan to Prevent and Combat Homelessness, which includes the following goals, • Ensure all City staff are equipped to address the intersection of homelessnessand their departments by providing trainings with local service providers on engagement techniques and available services.
• Facilitate City and broader community working groups to address homelessness and housing affordability inDowney.
• Mobilize and engage Downey residents, businesses, and faith communities to advocate for and champion long-term solutions toprevent and address homelessness. • Continue to support local organizations that provide emergency resources and provide opportunities for service expansion, such as co -location at City of Downey facilities. °* Continue to participate in regional efforts to address homelessness, and support additional bridge housing, access centers, and other homeless services offered in the region. • Identify potential sites in the City for emergency shelters to serve unmet needs of those in Downey experiencing homelessness.
• Ensure the Zoning Code defines supportive and transitional housing as residential uses, • Provide rental assistance and services coordination to prevent Downey residents from becoming homeless.

In addition to the goals above, the City will:
• Continue working with service providers and other non-profit organizations who aid residents experiencing homelessness and provide technical support as needed. ° Support and promote local housing opportunities for Downey residents by seeking space for local veterans experiencing homelessness in the Veterans Commons, 100 units of transitional housing planned for development in the Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan area.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, City Manager's Office 7ln/eƒrome: 2021 to 2029; Zoning revisionsfor emergency shelter siting and development standards within one year ofHousing Element adoption (see Program I5t Veterans Commons development tubecompleted byend ofJ0J2;Biweekly meetings with Veterans Commons developer; Presentation on best practices and regional issues and opportunities related to addressing homelessness to the Ad Hoc Committee for Affordable Housing in 2022.

Quantified Objective: Assist 5Opersons experiencing homelessness into housing osindicated /nthe City ofDowney Consolidated Plan 2DJ0'20J4(Assist 25persons experiencing homelexxness2030'20J4)
Coordinate with LACDA and other Los Angeles County agencies to promote local supportive housing development and rental opportunities for Downey residents, including Veterans Commons and the Restorative Care Village. The Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan area is owned by the County of Los Angeles and while the City does not have land use jurisdiction over the property, the City will coordinate with the County and encourage housing development opportunities in the Rancho Los

Amigos South Campus Specific Plan area. Coordinate with Gateway Council of Governments to explore regional solutions 10address housing needs.

Funding Source: General Fund
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning and Housing Divisions, City Monoges'O/fice
T?nnefrmnme/ Ongoing, Veterans Commons development tobecompleted byend o/J0J2, Biweekly meetings with Veterans Commons developer; Discussion with staff from the County ofLos Angeles onany proposed development applications to ensure they meet the goals outlined /nthe Rancho Los Amigos South Campus Specific Plan.

Maintain aninventory ofaffordable housing units inthe City, with unit affordability information to ensure landlords are compliant with deed restrictions. Continue to work with non-profit organizations, like Habitat for Humanity and PATH, to preserve existing affordable housing in the City. Pursue funding for ownership when necessary.

While no subsidized affordable units in the City currently are at risk of conversion to market rate, City staff will be prepared to provide technical assistance to owners, tenants, and non-profit housing corporation buyers of existing subsidized low-income housing complexes to extend subsidy contracts and/or find government financing (e.g., HOME funds) for acquisition of affordable rental units. If conversion of a subsidized complex or other affordable housing to market rate becomes likely, the City wiUworkvvithtenantsofat'riskunitsandpruvidethemvvitheducationneBardin0tenantrights,Mst right of refusal, and conversion procedures. The City will also provide tenants information regarding Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) rent subsidies through the Housing Authority and other affordable housing opportunities.

In addition, to promote the preservation of affordable housing in Downey, the City will explore the development of a community land trust to preserve the affordability of the housing stock. Work with regional transportation agencies to minimize and, if possible, eliminate the loss of housing in the City due to planned transportation expansion projects, such as the widening of Interstate 5.

Funding Source CD0GHOME
Responsible Party: Community Development Department Planning Division and Housing Division T7mefrmnve/ Ongoing
Quantified Objective: Preserve 195 units of affordable housing through the planning period (as listed /nChapter 2:Community ProfileyHous/ngNeeds Assessment
Continue partnership with the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA), which administers the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) rental assistance program in Downey through a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the City. Support additional Housing Choice Vouchers in the community and encourage rental property owners to rent to Housing Choice Voucher holders and register their units with the LACDA.

� Affirmatively market and promote the use of Housing Choice Vouchers in high opportunity areas.

Advertise and encourage landlords in Downey to participate in the Homeless Incentive Program run by LACDA, which provides financial support for property owners who rent to homeless Section 8voucher holders.

Continue to monitor the number of residents accessing the Housing Choice Voucher program, households on the wait list, and units available for rent. Direct interested residents to the County website and continue to provide information on the program, including new legal requirements pursuant to SB 329, which prohibits housing discrimination on the basis of source ufincome (including Housing Choice Vnucheo).

Funding Source: L(S.Department ofHousing and Urban Development /HUD/ Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Housing Division in coordination with L40A
T/mefronne: Ongoing
Quantified Objective: Preservation of455vouchers /nuse /nDowney /20JCV The has City allocated $950,000 to provide rental assistance to income eligible households adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The City provided rental assistance to 457 Downey renters in June 2020 to cover one month of rental payments for income eligible households. In 2021, the City updated the program guidelines to extend assistance from 1 month to 3 months of rental assistance to income eligible households, who's income was adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As of May 2021, the city has assisted atotal nf184households.

Continue toprovide rental assistance toDowney residents suffering from income loss due tothe [OV|D' 19pandemio. Expand to support homeowners at risk of foreclosure based on demonstrated ongoing need and funding availability.

Publicize the State'aCOV|D-19 rent relief program, which is being administered bythe California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency, and open to income eligible Downey households who need financial assistance for unpaid rent between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021.

Funding Source: HOME, Set Aside Funds, [Q8G'O/Cares Act Responsible Party: Community Development Department Housing Division TYnvsframe/ As needed
Quantified Objective: Rental and mortgage assistance to 300 homeowners during planning period, as funding permits
Adopt a Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance as required by State law and implement procedures within one year. Accommodate persons with disabilities who seek reasonable waiver or modification of land use controls and/or development standards pursuant to procedures and criteria set forth in the Municipal Code. Continue to administer the Housing Rehabilitation and Assistance program to assist

disabled households with accessibility mndificationstotheirhumes.CoondinatewithDowneyheahh care and other service providers to publicize the program to eligible residents.

Continue toimplement and enforce State accessibility standardsundtheprovisionsoftheAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Provide updated information regarding reasonable accommodation on the Cm/s website, at City Hall and at other public facilities. Facilitate training sessions with City staff, developers, service providers and residents regarding reasonable accommodation and ensuring equal access to housing for residents with disabilities.

Funding Source Community Development Department budget
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning and Housing Divisions 77nnafra/nac Adopt ordinance urresolution within one year ofHousing Element adoption; ongoing implementation
Encourage lot consolidation of smaller parcels to accommodate larger residential and mixed -use development projects on vacant and/or underutilized sites through provisions in the Zoning Code. As part of the General Plan and Zoning update, adopt additional incentives for projects that include lot consolidation as a way of adding more residential units to a project. Continue to promote the program atCity Hall and onthe [ity'saebsite.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division T7nvefrowme/ Ongoing; Update oƒGeneral Plan and Zoning Regulations within three years of Housing Element adoption.

Continue to monitor permit processing times and investigate ways to continue to streamline the process. Continue todigitize information, including building permits, to better understand timelines.

Expedite permit processing and reduce unnecessary delays by completing upgrades to the City's existing online permitting and licensing program as part of the City's Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB2, 2017) grant.

AsofJuly 17, 2020HO0determined that the City ofDowney was subject toSB35streamlining for proposed developments with 50 percent or greater affordability. To accommodate future SB 35 applications and inquiries, the City will create and make available an informational packet that explains 5835streamlining provisions in Downey and providesSB 35 eligibility information.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget; grants Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division and Building Division T7tnefronne/ Ongoing; electronic plan check system during FY2O22`2022;S83Sinformational material within one year ofHousing Element adoption

Adopt objective design standards tuensure that the City can provide local guidance ondesign and standards for by -right projects as allowed by State law. Adoption of objective design standards will facilitate high -quality residential development and compliance with State objectives. The objective design standards will ensure provision of adequate private open space, parking, and related features, as well asarchitectural design.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget; grants Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Timeframe: Within two years of Housing Element adoption PR*GRAM 3.4: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FEES
Continue to conduct annual reviews of planning and development fees to ensure that the fees are not excessive and are appropriate to cover the cost of services provided. Pursue additional streamlining opportunities to minimize costs for services as well as those assumed by the project applicant.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Timeframe: Ongoing; annual review offees
PRAWGRAM 3.5: SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING LAW
• Amend the Zoning Code to define employee housing and to clarify that employee housing serving six or fewer employees shall be deemed a single-family structure and shall be subject to the same standards for a single-family residence in the same zone consistent with the Employee Housing Act.
w Amend the Zoning Code to allow development of emergency shelters in the M-2 zone instead of the H-M zone and to change the City's distancing requirement for emergency shelter consistent with State Law (Government Code Section 65583.(a)(4)).
• Review the Zoning Ordinance and other pertinent documents such as Specific Plans to make any necessary changes to ensure compliance with the Supportive Housing Streamlining Act (AB 2162)and A81O1(Low+BarrierNavigation [enteo).

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Timeframe: Emergency Shelter zoning changes within one year of Housing Element Adoption; Employee Housing and AB 2162 and AB 101 zoning changes within three years of Housing Element adoption

Aspart ofthe General Plan and Zoning update, Modify/replace the Zoning Ordinance definition of "family" to ensure it does not exclude allowed uses and is inclusive/nondiscriminatory. Modify/replace the definition as appropriate.

Funding Source/ Community Development Department budget Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division Tinefronne/ Adoption Update of General Plan and Zoning Regulations within three years of Housing Element adoption.

Review development standards periodically to ensure that they do not constrain development of affordable housing and housing for special needs groups, such as individuals with disabilities. Revise development regulations and processes where it is needed and appropriate to address any identified constraints.

Funding Source General Fund
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division T7nnefromma: Ongoing; annual review
PROGRAM 3.8:ENERGY CONSERVATION
� Encourage energy -efficient design and energy conservation, and help residents minimize energy -related expenses. Maintain and distribute literature on energy conservation, including solar power, additional insulation, and subsidies available from utility companies, and encourage homeowners and landlords to incorporate these features into construction and remodeling projects.
� Encourage maximum utilization offederal, State, and local government programs, suchesthe County of Los Angeles Home Weatherization Program, that assist homeowners in providing energy conservation measures.

Continue to provide information on home loan programs available through the City and encourage residents to use the programs to implement energy efficient design.

Encourage and explore additional funding opportunities for energy conservation devices, including but not limited to lighting, water heater treatments, and solar energy systems in al, residential projects.

Review ordinances and recommend changes where necessary to encourage energy -efficient housing design and practices that are consistent with State regulations and advances in technology. Continue to enforce the State energy standards of the California Green Building Funding Source: Community Development Department budget, CDBG, HOME Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning and Building & Safety Divisions

Timeframe: Ongoing; Energy conservation information available two years after adoption of the Housing Element; Modifications to the City's development standards to ensure compliance with the latest energy conservation laws as part of the update to the General Plan and Zoning Regulations within three years of Housing Element adoption.

Quantified Objective: Rehabilitation assistance to approximately 20 low- and moderate -income households annually through the City's Housing Rebate And Grant Program, which covers energy -efficient design and energy conservation upgrades and modifications (or 166 households during the planning period) in rehabilitation assistance program as indicated in the City of Downey Consolidated Plan 2020- 2024. (this objective is also included in Program 4.2); Modifications to the City's development standards to ensure compliance with the latest energy conservation laws.

Submit the adopted Housing Element to City of Downey water and sewer service providers —including internal City departments —in accordance with Government Code Section 65589.7 and coordinate with relevant contacts regarding their review and input. The City provides water and sewer services in Downey and do not have procedures in place to grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower -income households as required by law. The City's sewer and water departments will adopt required procedures to grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower -income households as required by Government Code 65589.7.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning Division; Public Works Timeframe: Submit the adopted Housing Element to City of Downey water and sewer service providers within 30 days of adoption of Element, Adopt required procedures to grant priority for the provision of water and sewer services to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower -income households as required by Government Code 65589.7 within three years of Housing Element adoption, Coordination — ongoing.

Continue to monitor and evaluate development standards and advances in housing construction methods. Although the City has limited influence over non -governmental constraints, if non- governmental constraints are identified, the City will review, and if necessary, revise, any development regulations or processes that can potentially lessen those constraints.

Funding Source: Community Development Department budget Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning, Housing, and Building & Safety Divisions
Timeframe: Ongoing implementation

Continue to use code enforcement to support housing preservation and neighborhood quality and identify housing maintenance issues. Develop a proactive code enforcement program that targetsareas of concentrated rehabilitation needs, results in repairs, and mitigates potential cost, displacement, and relocation impacts on residents. Continue code enforcement referrals of property owners with compliance needs tahousing staff for rehabilitation assistance.

Funding Source/ Community Development Department budget, [D8G Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Code Enforcement Division Timeframe Ongoing
Quantified Objective: Assist 4,000 low- and moderate -income persons through the Code Enforcement program as indicated in the City of Downey Consolidated Plan 2020-2024 (assist 5D0persons annually J020'20J4V
Provide grant assistmnceofupto$35,00Otevery|ow'incomehouseho|dstoaddresscodeenforcemen1 violations and health and safety concerns, and to complete exterior painting. Grants can also be used to complete exterior and interior home repairs and make architectural modifications to achieve ADA compliance or reasonable accommodation for residents with disabilities. Provide refunds of 50 or 80 precent to low-income homeowners who have completed property, structural, and energy and/or water conservation improvements. The City anticipates that 20 projects will be assisted annually based on funding availability.

Funding Source: CDBG and HOME
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Housing Division Timefrarne: Ongoing
Quantified Objective: Rehabilitation assistance to 20 low- and moderate -income households annually (or 166 households during the planning period) in rehabilitation assistance program as indicated in the City of Downey Consolidated Plan 2020-2024.

Continue to contract with and refer fair housing complaints tuthe Fair Housing Foundation, whose services include counseling and mediation between tenants and landlords, fair housing treinings, workshops, and outreach. Facilitate public education and outreach by creating informational, multilingual informational material on fair housing that will be made available at public counters, libraries, postoffice, other community locations and on the City's website.

Funding Source: CDBG
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Housing Division Quantified Objective: Refer 290 Downey residents annually to Fair Housing Services as indicated in t City of Downey Consolidated Plan 2020-2024 (35 persons annually). I

PROGRAM 5.2: AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
The City promotes and affirmatively furthers fair housing opportunities and promotes housing for all persons, including those protected by the Califiri-iia Fair Empl*ym6nt #AXer State W feier?.l f?.ir XiL!si,.kg W fl?A.ki.kg 12ws. Ck-,?,fter 3 suxkR?rizes t�e f?4rAousing issues and concerns in Downey based on research conducted as part of this Housing Element update and supplemented by findings of the City's 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. Program 5.2 includes the following summary of the issues, contributing factors, and the City's actions in addressing these issues.
..... .. . . ..... . .......... .

Displacement risk due to regional e supply/production of I Thetwo identified fair housing issues are closely related, as such, the economic pressure (Priority: High) afforclable/special needs housing meaningful action items address at issues.

2. Displacement of residents due to regional
Promote public awareness of federal, State, and local
economic pressures
regulations regarding equal access to housing. Provide

3. High land and development costs in the
information to the public on various state and federal
region
housing programs and fair housing law. Maintain referral

4. Land use and zoning laws
information on the City's web site and at a variety of other

5. Public opposition to new development
locations such as community and senior centers, local social and land use and zoning laws
service offices, social media, via email, and at other public locations including City Hall and the library. Timefrome:four Disproportionate housing needs in 1. Inadequate supply/production of times per year as part affair housing workshops by the Fair areas with lower incomes and affordable/special needs housing Housing Foundation and other housing related events.
higher propordons of renters 2. Displacement of residents due to regional Implement an accessibility policy that establishes standards (Priority: High) economic pressures
and procedures for providing equal access to City services

3. Median gross rents lower than some more
and programs to all residents, including persons with limited expensive areas of the region, such as
proficiency in English, and persons with disabilities,
West Los Angeles and the South Bay
Timefrome: By 2023

4. Location of environmental health hazards
Ensure that all development applications are considered, reviewed, and approved without prejudice to the proposed residents, contingent on the development application's
compliance with all entitlement requirements. Timefrome:

Ongoing
Evaluate all proposed amendments to the General Plan's
Land Use Map and the Zoning Map for their effect on the City's policy of integrating diverse housing opportunities in

each neighborhood or planning district and on potential residential displacement. Timefrome: Ongoing; when any
land use policy changes are evaluated such as a General Plan update or Zoning Amendment adoptions.

Pursue funding and target neighborhoods of concentrated poverty for investment in rehabilitation, parks, transit, and active transportation. Ensure economic development plans reflect the needs of lower -opportunity neighborhoods.

Timefrome: onefunding application annually.

Continue to implement the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and HUD Consolidated Plan. Timeframe:

Ongoing, Al update in 2025.

Conduct public meetings at suitable times, accessible to persons with disabilities, and near public transit. Resources will be invested to provide interpretation and translation services when requested at public meetings.

Prioritize community and stakeholder engagement uring
controversial development decisions. Timefrome: Ongoing Related program actions in other programs in this Housing Plan:
. Program 13: Land Use Policy Changes (to increase high - density, residential capacity throughout the City and to remove constraints to housing development)
. Program 1.4: Accessory Dwelling Units
. Program 1.6: Inclusionary Housing
. Program 1.8: Replacement Of Units On Sites
. Program 23: Affordable Housing Development Incentives . Program 2.4: Affordable Housing Technical Assistance
0 Program 2.6: First -Time Home Buyer Assistance
. Program 2.9: Monitor And Preserve Affordable Housing And At -Risk Units
- Prog
6-22 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

Funding Source: General
Responsible Party. Community Development Department, Housing Division Timeframe; Varies by action item, see action items above.

Objective: Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities for a// persons. 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT 6-23

This page left intentionally blank.
6-24 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT

• Continue to employ a wide variety of media and methods to notify the public of important housing decisions and opportunities toprovide input.
• Expand outreach to non-profit developers, area service providers, and community based organizations. Partner with local community -based organizations to hold community meetings to gain input from Downey residents about housing needs, issues, and ideas to support the development of more affordable housing in the City. Invest resources to provide food, childcare, interpretation, and translation services atthese events. • Actively recruit residents from undemerved neighborhoods to participate on committees to address homelessness and affordable housing needs.
• Develop presentations and/or materials which address the local need for affordable housing and more resilient neighborhoods.
• Consider developing a housing resources handbook for Downey residents, homeowners, and developers.

Funding Source: General Fund (staff time)
Responsible Party: Community Development Department, Planning and Housing Divisions; City Monoge/s'D/fice
Tirnefrarne: Ongoing
Table 6.1 summarizes the City's quantified objectives for the 2021-2029 planning period by income group. While all programs list specific action to be undertaken, not all program actions are quantifiable and therefore only key programs include quantified objectives. The objectives are aggregated from the programs that indicate quantified objectives and are grouped under three categories as indicated in State Housing Element law. Not included inTable 6,lisanadditional 4,34Dpersons orhouseholds who will be assisted under the Fair Housing, Code Enforcement, Homeless Assistance programs. * The Construction Objective represents the City's remaining (after counting aacredit the units with approved or issued permits) 2021,2029 RH0Anf6,33J units. * The Rehabilitation Objective represents objectives for the Housing Rehabilitation Assistance program (20 low- and moderate -income households annually or 166 households during the planning period). The objective is divided between the lower three income categories as follows:
20Y6,40%,40Y6.
* The Conservation/Preservation objective refers to maintenance of the current level of assistance (455 vouchers) through the Housing Choice (formerly Section 8) Voucher program from the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA), the preservation of 195 units of affordable housing identified in the affordable housing at -risk analysis in Chapter 2: Community Profile and Needs Assessment and the provision of[OV|D'19rental/mortgage support to30Olow-income households for atotal assistance to9SOunits/house holds.

Conse rvation/P reservation
00iective
Total
*Note: The City of Downey is not responsible for the actual construction of these units. The City is, however, responsible for creating a ado tion and imlementation of

� t 4
?t { � t � } � � �� tk
l } it t } £
(: 4 i
r� ii fit?: is � .� 5,,.,,...G .., ?i �1�>.�ix �,C, .�s+ ;iti.. ¢r xis �d h=
�%
� i, ze\ �
i t
i d � ?� qt
��
�� w i ^ � v
,3. ��„ � 4 C z f, ,? �'�:,��. �.�

2021-2029 Housing Element. The sections below include summaries of the first of two planned section lists organizations contacted through the City's outreach work.

OnDecember 17, 2020,the City conducted acommunity workshop 10gather input from key local stakeholders, housing advocates, and residents. The meeting included aPowerPoin1presentation about the intent of the Housing Element update and Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), opportunities to meet local housing needs, and creative approaches to address the City's constraints to housing production, which was followed byafacilitated discussion regarding housing issues. The workshop had 58 attendees. Below is a summary of themes from the workshop, and screenshots of the notes taken during the meeting.

Key themes emerged during the discussion, including:
• The need for more affordable, multi -family housing
• Consider residents first, especially most vulnerable
.m Housing near transit and transit -oriented development * Revisit City zoning code and land use planning policies • Less restrictive development standards
• Supporting Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)and tiny house development •` Address climate change issues and resilience
• Parking, safety, and traffic concerns
• Potential negative effects offreeway expansion onDowney neighborhoods When asked about challenges, respondents talked about strict development standards and zoning, parking and traffic, limits on ADU development, declining affordability in the City,and the need for City staff to do more outreach and to educate the community on what level of income "affordable" housing serves.

Responses when asked about the types of housing needed in Downey included affordable, family friendly housing, tiny houses, housing for vulnerable populations, diverse housing types, middle housing like duplexes and triplexes, and housing built with afocus onconnectivity, and along transit corridors.

designs and easing ADU restrictions, creating more flexible zoning laws, introducing more mixed use designations, and allowing housing on other land uses, developing parking structures to address new parking needs, encouraging walkable communities, creating policies to promote climate friendly and qit--jIIA'4 a&i6l�rmwa f a f Wk
included focusing on pedestrian and bike safety, advocating for homeowners against expansion of the the culture, character, and history of the City of Downey.

The following pages display visuals of notes taken during the discussion.

U: 11 11"111111 ,
Oum an 1. What are the major housing issuestchallenges in Downey7 luea;on 2. What types of housing are particularly needed in the communmp- Suestlan 3. Downey's RHNA Is 6,510 housing units. The City has challenged this Key Themes,
k
k.

Additional Comments

Screenshot of Mural Notes from Workshop #1
December 1117,2020
6:00 - 9-00 Pm
Question 1. What ate The major ho'jsng Fssue&,'challenges in Dovmey? Question 2.VVe-Iaz Types of housing are particularly needed in the con-II-PUnity" Question 3. Downey's RHNA IS 6.510 PIOLISIng Units- The City has chaOenged this allocatton If tills allocation becornes finaI. whe:e ca®n new liouswig oe acconriod-sted In the Crty and what are creavve, sotuuons To audress. The need for housing in Doivney7 Key Themes

Screenshot of Mural Notes from Workshop
fU r;a7k
.C'4y ncf10n,00r.3xaS
t tzr . ?iwC r
!'i4':gq.+:T C$einir.i
tor, firm
fear zb445 y,,tr
' tfoe 44m'iq in't"$"'cs
4dE5s"4f6wd 1
r�„krr, r'41 ^�t"F5
Tunzs a r rr tr s7
�� kt ADO
t3fiz m MOIT
i 19
r sirkdoa9
rfirn ? d,#4mum
tk97d,K
.TAI9 vyill V-ib^ vU!iPC
Woclk ar(It^cesgfr
wcraw"Imi- *wi,
motinjhvov&-"nfk
1V ,atuz
o,�%nsrj
y."3�=
tf,'wF lMl"f+kikr3i'3
n4^�r�s'3�rti4 �i[b +Ftwar
I Fssr�trf� ,��r
3��`?�
No
z rpp r utwa t e, y s k itii ov
L[;fit, Poway en
Omm"WeA3tr,
�`�Pii's^
�Ynsa�YiFra�w�.ret;S"9'
', try"t'�-Ltsf'Ya
nrffi��ic"�t'�
Farkhio3,6 mkt d :
0fA, k °$:�1,,t
c4oP=eta^'w4�5'
tl9�k„;?itrs,'P
7r�i@fr�'

Screenshot of Mural Notes from or hop #1
Needs
New
HousingHousing
i ta` 6 k1 inRow
r'iAb'iif`:a r'i hl Vld Sti "
'�d'ouid be d'egC£�t tdto son �f�,R?'E $'ki*s��'f:+��
nomes
vyp,�s
�'G8rP8P��Pi a
�3'E%kt9Y"r
s"'Vord`.��i'we §deed
�a'$dWE"e'dCse L.ik°keC$:"'n'.'e:]f
6d6 h holly r1ni
Nlid f@e r'46iuwn
s mixed We,
.1$kw1-Wt not
L. X tr.PF . ta+ s,d66tg �§ &J Bii'kS!
r
dui t k tk rj f"ye xt
C-' �F €tt s for
Outdoor Open "One
Cwteop vudenls,
Fairkai
114iR aS:68 rxw
eCPt
Vi",',+Eri�"9ratn,. Mtn i d k' EL ikY�l &1i
AhQ*
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENTAPPENDIXA-6

Screenshot of Mural Notes from Workshop #1
i
Creative Solutions
AffordableftousI¢ng
Thdd2 ��
Hold
pro ram%fordyst
ckaaar gnsg zoningHNA
accountable for
note btsters
dumber
A4Ww/ Pnttrdduce
Bstdae s fany';etnq wwe
dBP€av createre Af9fa
I��ed �dte
cart de wwnhin Mrs plan
desag➢ts
CketagattatGtadae,
roo allow the City atnore
E dfnRlRty�
Memble zcarvng datars -
State level - key atrrrI
1? arkotq structures
City to room f strncr
Is through Mod use
Zornug surriddr'ds
planning and zoffing
drtcentdwas for.
czaaxaawaara+aay daraaf trusts
Ease restrdttio ns on
Tarot Incua lives to
for affordable Muting
ADUs
sdeveao,gers?
Pathway for caacrermy
City Coaunc➢B to use
;9dtaga➢Aa US make RR
Flats for t6aaaaa cuarrenliy
4rncenuves for sarlar
euntinent domain
nvusl in them, ra l s them
garnets
ap to code
Climate
rqe
f mw,-.drag Integrated
t
cdaaude arrr9 8dnf fu
h an O
OD around eaur rail
thaa tegh ut OW
fine
Rancho d.cs gunngus
housing c^onversavon
Campus
W, Re use of Iran-
CnctgLtf rrng pro en e ;
Urgency to address
essential ➢aDd utes raaae
said providmg tthern at
these Issues
as evaraaaeaamw rvu 1za
low c'ost to
and rarrvrate^.:recv eation '
dpverop rt
Everyone should
Encourage isd1 &adfle
have guaranteed
Erik analysis
ieserelf
dsn mm�V6�dnable
auaf�
I oueing
c6ttriumura$tIes
ovate ➢ ousfaafg gv;adct
Community gardens
aauf yarfsa3rcar"s twit are in
Incen atdze smsaa
andcanea�t�
Fine swigs the, taa�aslerC
yaG.Rivne e,
he aathytQ' offs
tadf8s%iP k2rotiAm
Promote pdSanes said
pmWasrstain ri; lice tho
Prtontty should be
dr OUde pt bheart -
hidaden on cut 0eci ntad
given to eeus¢draoeg
shauld be part of
god through dimaw.-
revideath,
now devebpment
cooled dus_,j"
rgpptF�C A�.^.R.�.'Eg�,)ItD'»Fi 6':Cd?atrf'
R .` - raaaaaaarrasaee
rrr.ta REarrastaakraarma fcr eacara.
as.�Ryur�EsSa rsrara6ees
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-7

creensot of Mural Notes from Workshop #1
Thq� .. I U twOv
loon Ltuir ar ,(,, cu
--4 n4*m pann vo of w(
Ofe a3 , raJi 01 PY tTI "!
�
n*t i
mlawo� 1s Safer to
00,saf rtr fir
walkmq
Pft"`see ve culture", iiHNA,,T'ta„ OftY ,et 95 RA'
chS PaCT�t, and 11.11 %ry 100 tanIT~' 4n Mel 1 st
of Clty 10 v .cr
waPam, to
twtrtt
�� t,t isa tthtt,� cstx:xtt
cIC.'1 ttp €tat uloceiIing
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIXA-&

On June 14, 2021, the City conducted a community workshop to gather feedback on the Public Review Draft Housing Element from key local stakeholders, housing advocates, and residents. The meeting included a PowerPoint presentation presenting key portions of the 2021-2029 Housing Element, including site suggestions and programs the City will undertake to address housing issues in Downey and to meet State law housing requirements. The workshop had 58 attendees and included a dedicated Spanish breakout room where the presentation was conducted in Spanish, however there were no attendees who chose to participate in Spanish. Both English and Spanish versions of the presentations were recorded and posted to the City's website for residents not able to make the meeting. Below is a summary of themes from the workshop, and screenshots of the notes taken during the meeting.

Key themes emerged during the discussion, including:
w. Expand availability ofaffordable, multi -family housing • Encourage development near transit corridors
• Parking, traffic, and overcrowding concerns
• Having a future orientation to support young people growing up in Downey and young families who want tostay inthe City
w Balancing the needs oflong-time homeowners and renters • More support needed for lower income, rent -burdened households • Address growing climate impacts
When asked about how the City might encourage more housing development in Downey, recommendations from the group included:
w Reduce orremove parking requirements
• Support pooled parking opportunities for developments • Encourage development along transit corridors and expanding bike infrastructure • Support tiny home development to help alleviate homelessness • Explore how rezoning might encourage more affordable developments • Ensure long-term affordability covenants onhousing
* Focus new multi -family developments inareas with lower impacts w Seek more input from under -represented groups

Reducer Remove focus m
Parking Requirements housing ie
lower:

Make sure that new
create communities
)m County land
residents have the Same
Consider joint parking
Wru green space
lid affordable
access to yualtty IvIrig
opportunities among
access to transit, new
housing
env ronmenrs as
developments
schools for additional
established residents do-
lstudenrs
More outreach and
Be future oriented so
Seek Input from
neourage
advertising for
kids can stay here into
underrelaresented
opment along
meetingst
adulthood ftthey
people for broad
sit corridors
input
input
choose
community Input
Study iraffe and
make parking
parory
Sugpoetyoung;
Have a tiny home
mrkFng patterns as
�make
";
workingyourfamilies
village for unhoused
community members
these are lntpacted by
new housing and
businesses

Screenshot of Mural Notes from Workshop
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-11

Screenshot of Mural Notes from r hop
I F .r ,:nir" ; +.it *iui
e utef e ove fOOLI"s MUM f8m %J1 Use nice county Iarari ev�vrrp rrt� rtt ri �� ar ons ewer lo(nt par inn 4r, r area Celts htusi"C''n areasv*"Ifth to la8t affor "+able s 10 � �I�r 4.m'�t 41;ZUt'4lr,926arinon P6rk1 4raei icy+pscts housing ;�r �r+, � +�;dsvetcpmee
��. alar � yei'C rr�. kart !,'r rlrrb
,fit �" r , G'.: ' e �;I'mIt+� a
G:I"r k i3 1r T`t` i °,+`r�*, r.e'a' ar "� �. .. �. rufore Outreach, aid o.."fa+'4iwe o6enwi so. 9 i,1s w Cur+ ti u d,rlra'r, Enc-.ur+s e adder ts'n fa, ''ds cKor, s,6y here Iita affo 6b(l fj irf' �t r r�r¢t 9au r t va r �elopralerl%'oldr9 , at. ,mut2rftrai+s7tsr(rA cor1lrhatrr`Ck�gl'eealls 51 tad,dkrnae.'ffl,*y �d�°er�rxi., � 1`I:�r;..:�s� fr�asir c�rr�lf�rs �
3 ;,e Irttrati tructure fnlput ; uote
L,00k to neigho.wing rA.zt
C"W es !or ideas rrl'o,
;a
witl r rll+ eo sfar e�
vat6 new
Schools for aad& 'mlE" t
Seem l' acrC frorn
Urderre,peserrted
peopte xf6r sh ad
cornmor ity 1t'Put
r]Iv+W
t?,St [ atrl to
!nt iead to on't nwke jmrlJn
Have a, t,r beme
d, ,pc(rt yawn u+ih e fir unh: used
park01Imocms c"S
tt eso cr r6oft ,.Pa.t ¢ fl i; y
Lfpwtrltof
`e
working 1vtr,'1,1es
IT l CP ii i9
tT, tS' h,,aCts1n(j i�fa
ill
Fu,r�' 4'sraa&
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-12

El� Citydbowney
City of Downey Housing Element Update Community Surveys, Meeting Our Housing Needs
Survey Results, March 1, 2021
The City of Downey developed a community survey to gather feedback for its 2021 Housing Element Update from Downey residents, workers, property owners and others interested in housing issues in the city. The survey was posted on the City of Downey's website, from December 18, 2020, to February 2, 2021, and available in both English and Spanish. The survey received a total of 991 responses; 54 surveys (5.4%) were completed using the Spanish language version of the survey.

The figures below display respondents' answers on how the city of Downey might meet its housing needs in the coming years. The "n =" which follows at the end of each figure heading refers to the total number of respondents who answered each question.
*'| live inDowney =9I59f
*'| live and work inDowney =6.7%
1%|work inDowney =1.1%
a|donot live orwork inDowney =l.7%
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-13

Prefer not to say N 2.4%
"Other ZIP Codes 1 0.7%
Adetached single-family homeMMMMMMMMMMM 68.3%
An apartment 20.0&
Acondominium/toxvnhome 5.3%
Adup|ex/trip|ex/fourp|ex 4.3%
|donot currently have apermanent home 1O��
��
Accessory dwelling unit ("gnannyflat") [0.6&
"
1 Group home/assisted living |O2Y6 '
Amobile home |0.2%

Homeowner ENNIMEMEM 62.0%
Renter 33.2%
Live with friends/family, do not own or rent 11 4.2%
Do not currently have a permanent home 110.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
EMPTAM
37,15601MOMMOM.,

Hispanic/Latino

62.7%
White non -Hispanic
11111MM 15.3%
Prefer not to say
OM 10.0%
Two or more races

4.1%
Asian or Asian American

3.5%
Black or African American

2.6%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

1.0%
Native American
Middle Eastern
men
11111111191 1111 1 i
I=0=11 1111!�I 1 11 : � Ili i •
0M
• Thai = < 1%
• Marathi = < 1%
• Cambodian = < 1%
• Vietnamese = < 1%
• Guirati = < 1%
• Tagalog = < 1%
0 Prefer not to say = 1.9%
Is Spanish = 11.0%
w English =86.4%
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-16

Developer ofhousing 111%
Developer ofcommercial buildings I O� 3%�

IlI11111110111111 1:111111111lg� III !1111111 111111 111 111 R
OVA
Figure 13: What are your reasons for living in Downey? "Other" responses (n=45) The size of phrases below are based upon the number of similar "other" responses to this question. For instance, seven survey respondents said they had lived in Downey for a long time, and another six indicated they were born and raised in Downey. Two respondents mentioned good neighborhoods as the reason they lived in Downey, while another two respondents talked about affordability. , f
taillily ch-01ces"
inherited fi,�unlly house
"a J[C C �1 t V
found neiv place here
I "I' o' I "I'l C 1* C I ("I C I'l t
ernmenev homing
wbuctlan 11fe
fanuiv ori,�nted
church
good neighborhoods
orew- up in Downey
born and raised in Downey
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-18

within the last 5 years? Select all that apply. (Question 5; n=960) Other responses to question 5:
s' Parking issues (3 responses)
• Family struggling 10find affordable housing (3responses) • Childcare costs
• City permit acquisition iohard
� Housing iotoo expensive
� Investors buying homes
��' Rent isincreasing often
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-19

outbreak? Select all that apply. (Question 6; n=966)
0 Homeowner d Renter ' Live with friends/family, do not own or pay rent 11 Do not currently have a permanent home Other responses to question 6include:
0 Neighbors experiencing overcrowding
� Few homebuyingopportunities
� Helping adult children with rent
� Senior parent moving in
.^ Landlord not doing repairs
� Apartment manager refused county rental assistance for tenants Working and living athome
0 Ranter
�
Live with fhends/famiky,do
not own orpay rent
02Qonot currently have a
permanent home
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-20

1171'Rii i111111111!1111 ME=
Detached single-family homes

28.7%
Condominiums/townhomes
i 22.2%
Smaller scale apartment buildings (4 units or fewer)

10.4%
Duplexes or Triplexes (2 or 3 unit buildings)

9.9%
Senior housing

8.5%
Larger scale apartment buildings (5 units or more)

7.8%
Accessory dwelling units (granny flats or guest houses)

6.8%
*Housing for families and individuals who need...

3.4%
*Interim/transitional housing for people looking to...

2.0%
Mobile home parks

0.4%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
IN First Choice 0 Second Choice a Third Choice
AggrErys-l"l, , , I -
Situation. (Question 7; n=949)

28.7%

22.3%

10.4%
01RVA
Senior housing 8.

Larger scale apartment buildings (5 units or more)
7 7%
Accessory dwelling units (granny flats or guest houses) *Housing for families and individuals who need supportive ... 3.3% *Interim/transitional housing for people looking to ... 1.9% Mobile home parks 1 0.4%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
W Homeowner IS Renter N Do not currently have a permanent home if Live with friends/family, do not own or pay rem 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-21

Support programs tohelp homeowners at risk of
mortgage default tokeep their homes, including mortgage loan programs.

Encourage the rehabilitation ofexisting housing molder
neighborhoods.
help move people into permanent housing.

Establish housing for households with special needs such asseniors, large families, veterans, and/or persons with disabilities
"live/work" neighborhoods.

Ensure that children who grow vpinDowney can afford to
live inDowney ontheir own
#mHomeowner
�Live with fnends/famUxdonot own n,pay rent
Total, All Respondents
6 Renter

Figure 20: Rank the importance of current housing challenges in Downey, (1= Not Important, W64
Developer of Housing) (Question 8; n=108;136;21)
Encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing in older neighborhoods.
1 1111W 01
Ensure that children who grow up in Downey can afford to live in Downey on their own
!11�1!11 rmm# •
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-23

Downey for new housing. (Question 9; n=918)
Lakewood Blvd. and Paramount Blvd.
ovincreasing the number ufhousing units allowed uneach
piece ufproperty within existing residential neighborhoods, such a,allowing more housing tvbebuilt inmulti-family
areas.

Within existing commercial shopping centers.

On parking lots of properties owned by religious
a I Most Favorable Locatio52 '3 04 5 Least Favorable Location New housing should belocated where bwill have the least impact untraffic |nDowney.

New housing should be spread evenly across all parts of the planned public transit.

New housing should belocated within easy access of shops and services.

--
where to allow new housing in Downey. Please rank the following in order of importance. (Question 10; n=569)
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%

25.8%
New housing should be New housing should be
located within easy access of spread evenly across all
shops and services. parts of the city.

Most Important 212 a 3 0 4 - Least Important
Figure 24: City of Downey Renter Responses to: There are a number of approaches for deciding where to allow new housing in Downey. Please rank the following in order of importance. (Question 10; n=313)
70%
OYA
44YA

32.6%
New housing should b e located where it will have
HTSVII5.1
IN I - Most Important 02 1, 3 IN 4 - Least Important

Key themes from responses included:
• Need for more housing
• Affordable housing
• TrafOc
• Homelessness
• Bus and transit accessibility and connections tonew housing • Consider the needs ofseniors and other special needs groups • Overcrowding concerns
• Financial support for homeowners 10rehabilitate homes • Promote diversity
• Build more multi -unit housing
• Build housing near schools
• Transform older hotels and motels
* Adjust zoning code and ease requirements tomake iteasier tobuild housing Housing policies which support renters rights and financial support � Maintain single family zoning
� Concerns related 10building more housing
2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-26

English Language Survey
community's long-term physical growth and provision of public services. The City is now updating th udes
Housing Element of that plan, which looks at the community's housing needs, and incl 7 approaches Downey will use to respond to demands for new housing, housing maintenance, and equal access to housing. Your input is critical to developing a housing plan that responds to local needs, values, and preferences. Please help by identifying what you believe are the most important issues to address over the next five to 10 years. Thank you for participating! a. Live inDowney
b. Work inDowney
c. Live and work inDowney
d. idonot live orw/orkinDowney

2. Which best describes your current living situation?
a. Adetached single-family home
b. Adup|ex/ hp|ex/fourp|ex
o. Acondom inium/tuwnhome
d. An apartment
e. Accessory dwelling unit (granny flat/guest house)
f. Amobile home

0. Gnuuphome/assisted |k/in8
h. |nterim/transitiona|housing and shelter
i. Donot currently have apermanent home
Other (please specify)
a. Rent
b. Own
c. Live with fhends/famiky,dnnot own orpay rent
d. Donot currently have apermanent home
Other (please specify)

4.What are your reasons for living |nDowney? Choose all that apply. a. Cost of housing
b. Quality ufhousing
c. Range of housing choices
d. Types o{housing available
e. Community and recreation amenities, like parks and recreation centers t Schools

0. Distance from work
h. Transportation options
i. Distance from home tnshopping, restaurants, healthcare, orother services j. Close distance 10family and friends
Other (please specify)
S. Prior %othe coronavirusoutbreak, had you experienced any mfthe following housing issues within the last 5years? Select all that apply.
a. Struggle to pay rent/mortgage
b. Lack funding for repairs
c. Significant rent increases
d. Housing discrimination
e. Too many people inthe house (overcruvvding)
f. Adult children living athome due toinability toafford housing

6.Have you experienced any mfthe following housing issues this year since the commnaviruaoutbreak? Select all that apply.
a. Struggle tupay rent/mortgage
b. Lack funding for repairs
o. Significant rent increases
d. Housing discrimination
e. Too many people inthe house (overurovvding)
f. Adult children living athome due toinability toafford housing

7.What types ofhousing does Downey need most?
Drag and drop your top three prioritiesƒrnmthe "Your choices " list on the loft to the "Your ranking "box onthe right, ranking the/n/norder qƒimportance, with the most important ontop and the least important onthe bottom.

Your ranking
a. Detached single-family homes
b. Condom iniums/townhomes
c. Larger scale apartment buildings (5 units ormore)
d. Smaller scale apartment buildings (4units orfewer)
e. Duplexes orTriplexes (2or3 unit buildings)
t Senior housing

8. Mobile home parks
h. Housing for families and individuals who need supportive services like jobs training and social services
i. Interim/transitional housing for people looking totransition from homelessness ]. Accessory dwelling units (granny flats orguest houses)

8. Rank the importance of current housing challenges in Downey.

Very
Somewhat Not Don't
Important
Important important Know
Ensure that children who grow up in Downey can
0 0 0 0
afford to live in Downey on their own.
'Focus new housing near commercial areas, creating
0 0 0 0
"live /work" neighborhoods.

Streamline the process for new housing construction.
0 0 0 0
Establish housing for households with special needs
such as seniors, large families, veterans, and/or
0 0 0 0
persons with disabilities.

Provide shelters and transitional housing for homeless
families and individuals, together along with services
0 0 0 0
that help move people into permanent housing.

Encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing in
0 0 0 0
older neighborhoods.

Support programs to help homeowners at risk of
mortgage default to keep their homes, including
0 0 0 0
mortgage loan programs.

Targeted efforts to address long-term inequities in the 0 0 0 0
housing market, including discrimination in renting.

9. To meet the City's long-term housing needs, the City will need to plan for more homes. This ixclules sixgle-42xtily kxxxes ?s well ?.F-2;r?rtyiexts, tzwxk(ixkes, 2xi cixdo:uixiuxEs. Please raxk tk,i ideas below based on what you think are the best general locations in Downey for new housing.

Drag and diop yout top three prioritiesorn the "Your choices" list on the left to the "Your ranking" box on the right, ronking them in order of importance, with the most irnportont on top and the least importont on the bottom,
Your ranking
a. Along major corridors, like Imperial Blvd., Firestone Blvd., Lakewood Blvd. and Paramount Blvd. b. Within existing commercial shopping centers.
hotels or motels that can be converted to housing.
d. By increasing the number of housing units allowed on each piece of property within existing residential neighborhoods, such as allowing more housing to be built in multi -family areas. e. On parking lots of properties owned by religious institutions if those institutions wish to develop housing.

MEMENNONNNNNEEM•III
� on

SINGLE-FAMILY MULTI -FAMILY

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
A single-family property has one A multi -family property has more An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is
building on its own lot, meant for than one housing unit, where each an extra housing unit, either a
one family. holds a different family or
separate home or an apartment,
household. These include duplexes,
built by a homeowner on their
condos, townhomes and apartment
property for use by family members
buildings.
or to rent to others.

10. There are a number of approaches for deciding where to allow new housing in Downey. Please rank the following in order of importance.

Dreg and drop your top three priorities from the "Your choices" list on the left to the "Your ranking" box on the right, ranking them in order of importance, with the most important on top and the least important on the bottom.
a. New housing should be concentrated near existing and planned public transit. b. New housing should be spread evenly across all parts of the city. c. New housing should be located where it will have the least impact on traffic in Downey. d. New housing should be located within easy access of shops and services. 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-31

a. 1toSyears
b. 6to1Oyears
c. 11toI0years
d. 21ormore years
e. |donot live inDowney

13.Please indicate your gender.
a. Male
b. Female
c Non -binary
d. Prefer not to state

24.How do you identify yourself? (Select all that apply) a. VVhitenon'Hbpanic
h. Black orAfrican American
c. Hispanic/Latino
d. Asian orAsian American
e. Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander
t Native American
G. Prefer not tosay

15. What language is primarily spoken in your household? a. English
b. Spanish
c. Korean
d. Tagalog
e. Chinese
f. Vietnamese
Other (please specify)

16. How old are you?

17. Which ZIP code do you reside in?
Other (please specify)
- I I I - a 0 , 1 0

19. Check all that apply to you:
a. Owner of a business in Downey
b. Developer of housing
c. Developer of commercial buildings
d. Use public transportation
e. Commute more than 10 miles to work
f. •' advocate
g. Social service provider

Spanish Language Survey
En 2008, la Ciudad de Downey adopt6 un plan, liamado Plan General, para guiar las clecisiones quel

1.Actua|nnente usted:
a. ViveenDowney
b. Tr bajaenDowney
c. VkeytrabajaenDowney
d. NovivenitnabsjaenDuwney
2'ZCuA|describe me]mrsusitvaci6ndenida actual?
a. Una viviendaunifamiUarindependiente
b. Un duplex / triplex /fourp|ex
c. Un condominio
d. Unapartamentu
e. Unidaddeviviendaancesoha(ADUoseQundavivienda)
t Una casa m6vi|
g. Hogargnmpa|/vidaasbtida
h. Vk/iendayrefu0io provisional /detranxicibn
Otros (por favor especifique),
�
3'ZCu6l describe nnejormuu1tuacidnactual deviuiencla7
a. |nquiUno
b Pmpietaho
c Vive con amigos /fami|iares no es propietaho ni paga a|qui|er

7.jQud tipo de vivienda necesitamm6s Downey?
Arrastreysueltesus troapribridadesprimcipolesdekr8sto"Sus e/ecciones"de/oizqmerdou/cmxdru"Su cbsificod6n"de/udeoechc,clasific6odo/nsenondende inpodonc6a,con /osmds0nportontesen/oporte deonriboy/osmenosirnpmr1ontesen/mpmrtedeobcjo.
=Categorizor por nivel de importancia I
a. Viviendaunifami|iarindependiente
b [ondominios
c EdURdusdeapartamentusdemayor esca|a(Sunidadesom6s)
d. Edhlciosdeapartementosdennenoresua|a(4unidadesomenos) e. 8dp|eaoTriplex (edUOduadeZo3unidades)
[ Viviendapanapersonas mayores
g. Panquesdecasasm6vi|ey
h. VivicndasparafamiUaseindividuosqueneuesitansemidosdeepoyocomocwpacitac|bndeemp|en ysen/idossoda|es
. Viviendaprovisional /transhorimparapersonas quebuoounbmcer|atransidbnde|afahadevivienda (homeless)
�Unidaddeviviendaauceonha(ADUosegundavivienda)

8. Clasifique la importancia de los problemas de vivienda en Downey.

Muy Algo No No se
importante importante importante
Aseg6rar de que los hijos que crecen en Downey
puedan permitirse un dfa vivir independientemente en
0 0 0 0
Downey.

Crear viviendas nuevas cerca de Areas comerciales,
0 0 0 0
creando vecindarios de "vivir/ trabajar".

Facilitar/agilizar el proceso de construcci6n de
0 0 0 0
viviendas nuevas.

Establecer viviendas para hogares con necesidades
especiales como personas mayores, familial
0 0 0 0
numerosas, veteranos y / o personas con
discapacidades.

Proporcionar refugios ("shelters") y viviendas de
transici6n para familias e indivicluos sin hogar, junto 0 0 0 0
con servicios que ayuclen a las personas a mudarse a
viviendas permanentes.

Promover la rehabilitaci6n de viviendas en vecinclarios 0 0 0 0
m6s antiguos.

Apoyar programas para ayuclar a los propietarios de
viviendas en riesgo de incumplimiento de la hipoteca a
0 0 0 0
conservar sus viviendas, que incluyen programas de
pr6stamos hipotecarios.

Esfuerzos dirigidos a reducir las desigualda es a largo plazo en el mercado de la vivienda, esto incluye la
0 0 0 0
discriminaci6n de los inquilinos.

%W�VVIVJL' R1 -
vivienclas nuevas.

Arrostre Y suefte sus tres prioridudes principules de /a fista "Sus elecciones, " de lo iz.quierdc al cumfro "Su closificacidn " de to det echq, cicysific6ndolas en orden de importoncio, con /as mas importantes, en /c porte de arriba y los menos importantes en to parte de abojo.

CategorriZafl por nivel de importando
a. A lo largo cle las calles principales, como Imperial Blvd., Firestone Blvd., Lakewood Blvd. y Paramount Blvd.
b. Dentro cle los centros comerciales
hoteles o moteles que se puedan convertir en vivienclas d. Al aumentar la canticlad cle uniclacles cle viviencla permiticlas en cada propieclad dentro cle los vecinclarios residenciales, como permitir que se construyan m6s vivienclas en ireas multifamiliares
estacionamientos cle las instituciones religiosas, si clichas instituciones desean clesarrollar vivienclas

10. Hay varias estrategias Para decidir d6nde permitir nuevas viviendas en Downey. Clasifique los siguientes en Or en de importancia.

Arrostre Y suelte sus tres prioridodes principales de to listo "Sus elecciones" de to izquierdo a/ cuodro "Su clasificaci6n " de /a derecho, clasific6ndolas en order de importancio, con los m6s importantes on la parte de orribo y las menos importontes en la porte de abojo.

Categorizor por nivel de importancio
a. Las vivienclas nuevas deben concentrarse cerca del transporte p6blico existente o planificado. b. Las vivienclas nuevas deben distribuirse cle manera uniforme en toclas las partes cle la ciuclad. c. Las vivienclas nuevas deben ubicarse cloncletengan el menor impacto en el tr6fico en Downey, d. Las vivienclas nuevas deben ubicarse con fAcil acceso a comercios y servicios. 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX A-39

a. 1aSaOos
b` 6a10ahos
c. 11a20aOos
d. 31umisafios
e. Yo no vivo en Downey
a. Masculino
b. Femenino
a. Blanco (no hispano)
b. Negro o afroarnericano
Otms(esped0oar)

e. W1enmrde1AaMos
b. 1Da29
u 30 a49
d. 6Qa64
e. 65ohnsom6s
Otms(espec0o*r)

1O/IOOub
Abode Communities
Abundant Hope Christian Center
Affordable Living for the Aging
American Legion Post #27D
Angel Step Inn, Southern California Alcohol and
Drug Programs, Inc.

Arc Mid -Cities
Arc ofLos Angeles and Orange Counties
Assistance League ofDowney
8|AofSouthern California
8irohcrestApartmen1s
BriteNew Horizons Services Inc
[AEmerging Technology Fund (CETF)
California Assembly
California Association ofRealtors
California Department ofHousing and
Community Development
California Senate
Calvary Chapel Christian School
Calvary Chapel Christian School, Grizzly
Academy
Calvary Chapel Church
Casa Youth Shelter
Catholic Charities
Catholic Charities Family Shelter
Chi|dren's Dental Health Clinic
Christian Outreach Appeal
City ofDowney Adult Literacy Program
City ofDowney ' ASPIRE Program
City ofDowney Community Development
Department
CityufQovvney-FireDepartment
CityofDowney-Library
City ofDowney ' Police Department
City ofDowney Public Works
City ofDowney Recreation Department
City ofDowney Senior Meals Program
Clark Manor Apartments (National CORE)
Clothes the Deal
Coast tnCoast Foundation
Commission on HIV County ofLos Angeles
Communities for aBetter Environment
Community Development Commission of
Downey
Community Family Guidance Center
Creative Beginnings Elementary
Department of Rehabilitation, State of
California
Desert Reign Church
Disabled American Veterans
Downey Adult School
Downey Arts Coalition
Downey Chamber nfCommerce
Downey Christian School
Downey Community Corner (Facehuokgroup)
Downey Community Health Center
Downey Conservancy
Downey Coordinating Council
Downey Council PTA
Downey Council PTA -Helps
Downey Family YMCA
Downey First Christian Church
Downey Historical Society
Downey Meals onWheels
Downey Memorial Christian Church
Downey Newcomers Club
Downey Seniors Club
Downey Tenants Union
Downey Unified School District
Downey United Methodist Church
Downey View Apartments (National CORE)
East La Community Corporation (ELA[C)
East Los Angeles VVomen'nCenter
Exchange Club Family Support Center
Fair Housing Council ofOrange County
Fair Housing Foundation
Family Crisis Center
FEK8A
Food Help (Downey First)
Foster Youth Services Coordinating Program
FPC(First Presbyterian Church) Downey
Gangs Out ofDowney (GOOD)
Gateway Cities Council of Governments
Good Shepherd Lutheran Church
Greater Downey Association ofRealtors
Habitat for Humanity
Harbor Interfaith Shelter
He|p|ineYouth Counseling, Inc.

Heritage Court Apartments (Abode Senior
Housing)
House ofYahweh
HUD Office nfFair Housing and Equal
Opportunity
Human Services Association ofLA
Imago DeiChurch
Imperial Highway Church ofChrist
John Stewart Company
]ovenex|nu.

KaiserPermanemte
K8Home
Keep Downey Beautiful
Kids in Need of Defense
Kingdom Causes Bellflower
Kirkwood Christian Schools, Elementary Campus
Kirkwood Christian Schools, Preschool Campus
Kivvanis Downey Los Amigos
KivvanisClub ufDowney
LeCasi1a,Southern California Alcohol and Drug
Programs, Inc.

LACounty Dept. ofPublic Health Childhood
Lead & Poisoning Prevention Program
LDS Church
Legacy Church (First Baptist Church ofDowney)
Light & Life Church Downey
Lions Club ofDowney
Living Help Center
Long Beach Rescue Mission
Long Beach Small Business Development Center
Los Angeles Community Development Authority
Los Angeles County Board ofSupervisors
Los Angeles County Department Child
Protective Services
Los Angeles County Department ofChildren and
Family Services
Los Angeles County Department ofPublic
Health
Los Angeles County Office ofEducation
Los Angeles County Regional Broadband
Consortium
Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority
(LAHSA)
Messiah Lutheran Church
Meta Housing Corp
Mexican American Opportunity Foundation
Downey Center
&qexicanAmericenOpportunhyFoundation-
Headquarte/s
Montessori [hi|dnen'oAcademy
National Community Renaissance and Hope
Through Housing Foundation
New Living Way Church
New Season LA I Downey
North Downey Church ufChrist
OLPHVVomen'oGuild
Optimist Club ofDowney
Our Lady ofPerpetual Help
Our Lady ofPerpetual Help School
Partnership Housing Inc.

People Assisting the Homeless (PATH)
Pathways Community Services
P|HHea|th
Project Sister
C-Up(Therapeutic Horseback Riding for
Disabled Persons)
Rancho Los Amigos Foundation/Health System
Rotary Club ofDowney
Saints ofValue
Salvation Army
Save the Brave USA
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center
Southern CACouncil ofGovernments (S[AG)
Southern California Rehab Service
Southern California Resource Services for
Independent Living
5pectrumLinc,|nc
S1Mark'sEpiscopal School
St Pius X'St Matthias Academy
3tRaymond School
St. Francis Medical Center Foundation
St. Raymond Catholic Church
Stay Gallery
Sunshine Community Resource Organization
[enter
The Whole Child
The Salvation Army Bell Shelter
The VVomen'sCouncil, Southern California
Alcohol and Drug Programs, Inc.

TLC Family Resource Center (at Downey Unified
School District)
Transitional Living Centers
True Lasting Connections (TLC)
U.S. Department of HUD
U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate Watch -it -Grow Urban Gardening Foundation
Volunteers of America Greater Los Angeles

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
2020 W. El Camino Avenue, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95833
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
Aldo Schindler, Director
Q#oAmi jjZq_nP_mRL o,n x c e - ALL _X -a-up
City of Downey
I 1111 Brookshire Avenue
Downey, CA 90241
UrIT41041WATIMM a
Thank you for submitting the City of Downey's (City) draft housing element received for review on September 15, 2021. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (b), the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review, Our review was facilitated by a conversation on November 8, 2021 with Senior Planner Crystal Landavazo, Associate Planner Irving Anaya, and consultant, Diana Gonzalez, of MIG. In addition, HCD considered comments from Californians for Homeownership pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (c).

The draft element addresses many statutory requirements; however, revisions will be necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law (Article 10.6 of the Gov. Code), The enclosed Appendix describes the revisions needed to comply with State Housing Element Law.

The City's statutory deadline to adopt a housing element was October 15, 2021. For your information, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1398 (Chapter 358, Statutes of 2021), if a local government fails to adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days of this statutory deadline, then any rezoning to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), including for lower -income households, shall be completed no later than one year from the statutory deadline. Otherwise, the local government's housing element will no longer comply with State Housing Element Law, and HCD may revoke its finding of substantial compliance pursuant to Government Code section 65585, subdivision (i).

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criterion. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) I Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD's Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD's Permanent

Mr1r@Vr99WTTM-FJ-M=

Page 2 ends

Downey City CouncilFebruary 8, 2022

Downey City Council
February 8, 2022