Agenda packet — Dublin City Council, June 21, 2022 (part 3 of 5)

Agenda Item 4.12
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Five-Year Review of Fire and Emergency Response Services Contract with Alameda County Fire Department
Prepared by: John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager and Bonnie S.

Terra, Division Chief, Alameda County Fire Department
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will receive a five-year evaluation report on fire and emergency response services provided under contract by the Alameda County Fire Department.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None.

DESCRIPTION:

Since July 1, 1997, the City has contracted with the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) for fire and emergency response services. The current Fire and Emergency Response Services Agreement has a term of 20 years and will expire on June 30, 2032. Pursuant to this agreement, the City and ACFD agreed to jointly prepare an evaluation of services provided to the City every five (5) years and present the evaluation to the City Council by June 30th of every fifth year. This report will summarize and highlight certain agreement areas over the period beginning July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2021 (reporting period).
314

Page 2 of 8 ends

Service Level Quality
Station Location and Staffing
ACFD operates three fire stations within the City limits. Station 16 is located on 7494 Donohue Drive and operates one engine company with three firefighters. Station 17 is located at 6200 Madigan Road and houses one engine company and one truck company with three personnel on each apparatus. Station 18 is located at 4800 Fallon Road and operates one engine company with three personnel.

ACFD utilizes a constant staffing model as a department standard; this means that the appropriate numbers of personnel are available to fill all positions at each station on a daily basis. Each engine and truck company within the City of Dublin is capable of providing paramedic level services. All ACFD apparatus have a minimum of one paramedic and two emergency medical technicians.

There is a minimum of four paramedics assigned to the City of Dublin at all times.

In addition to the staffing on each apparatus from Stations 16, 17 and 18, the City of Dublin receives automatic aid from San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) Engine 39, Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department, and the full depth of resources of ACFD’s 34 companies.

These resources are built into designated responses and are also utilized on an as-needed basis.

Response units are utilized to ensure that the closest resources are responding in adequate numbers and that established standards of coverage are maintained within the City.

Response Times
The emergency response time standard requires that the first fire unit arrive on scene within five minutes or less 90% of the time. Response times for this reporting period were not met in Fiscal Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 for All Emergency Calls. ACFD missed the response time standard by one to two percentage points. This was the result of many factors such as human error using the mobile data terminals, information technology connectivity issues, and inaccurate fire reporting for recording response delays. ACFD and the City of Dublin have worked together to implement systematic changes that have resulted in compliant response times. These changes include the installation of a GPS-based signal preemption system along Dublin Blvd, updated fire reporting software and relative training on program use, and technology updates to mobile data terminals.

Table 1: Emergency Response Times
Fiscal Year All Emergency Calls
<5-minute response
All Calls
<5-minute response
2016-2017 90% 88%
2017-2018 88% 87%
2018-2019 89% 87%
2019-2020 88% 86%
2020-2021 92% 87%
Bold indicates time standard met
315

Page 3 of 8 ends

In the 2011-2016 reporting period, ACFD met the response time standard every year in each category.

ACFD met or exceeded the response time standard of two engines and one truck on scene for first alarm assignments within 10 minutes of dispatch 90% of the time for each year of the reporting period. These response times represent calls where each apparatus arrived on scene and the incident was confirmed at the specified location.

Table 2: First Alarm Response Times
Fiscal Year First Alarms
<10-minutes
First Alarms
>10-minutes
Percentage
2016-2017 39 39 100%
2017-2018 35 38 92%
2018-2019 39 43 91%
2019-2020 32 34 94%
2020-2021 42 45 93%
Bold indicates time standard met
Adequacy of Services Provided
A. Fire Protection/Response Services

EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE
ACFD provides a minimum of one paramedic on all fire apparatus in the City of Dublin at all times. To date, the response times to Emergency Medical Service (EMS) calls within the City have exceeded the County EMS contractual requirement of 10 minutes or less 90% of the time. In addition, ACFD provides medical oversight and a comprehensive quality improvement program as required in the City’s First Responder Advance Life Support (FRALS) Agreement. ACFD has complied with all applicable county and state data and certification/licensure requirements.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE
ACFD maintains a fully functioning hazardous materials team. The team is equipped and trained to handle a variety of hazardous materials incidents including radiological and biological incidents. The team is classified Type I as defined by the California Office of Emergency Services. It responds and functions from specifically equipped hazardous materials response units. ACFD is part of the Alameda County Mutual Aid Plan, which ensures the appropriate response to incidents that would otherwise overwhelm the fire resources in Dublin/ACFD.

B. Fire Prevention Services

FIRE PREVENTION SERVICES
Standard staffing for the City of Dublin Fire Prevention Bureau consists of one Deputy Fire Marshal, one Fire Code Compliance Officer, and one Office Assistant II 316

Page 4 of 8 ends

(City of Dublin position). When an on-site Deputy Fire Marshal (DFM) is not assigned, a Fire Plan Checker and the Division Chief of Fire Prevention assume the duties. The DFM provides coordination of daily activities for Fire Prevention personnel assigned to the City. The Division Chief of Fire Prevention is also available to attend planning and development meetings as needed and provide oversight for the ACFD Fire Prevention activities.

Fire Investigation – ACFD provides fire investigation services to determine origin and cause of fires. Fire Investigators are called by operational personnel when the need arises.

Occupancy Inspections – Fire Prevention personnel perform all required inspections relating to construction, fire operational permits and the self-inspection program.

Fire companies perform the required mandated inspections for public schools and multi-family housing.

Table 3: Fire Prevention Bureau Plan Checks & Inspections Fiscal Year Plan Checks Inspections
2016-2017 1,633 4,304
2017-2018 1,654 4,141
2018-2019 1,195 4,034
2019-2020 797 4,284
2020-2021 490 2,964
Plan Submittal Review – The City’s Community Development Department reported that plans for new construction and tenant improvements have been submitted and reviewed within the established City standards. In addition, the Fire Prevention Bureau has reviewed planning department referrals for plan development, tract map, parcel map and conceptual designs.

Development Inspection – Development Inspections are performed at a number of stages during the development process. Fire Prevention personnel inspect the water supply, fire sprinklers, hydrants, and alarm systems prior to issuing a temporary or final certificate of occupancy by the Building Department.

Table 4: Fire Prevention Revenue
Fiscal Year Construction Revenue Permit Revenue
2016-2017 $515,073 $111,641
2017-2018 $603,819 $105,251
2018-2019 $712,418 $108,125
2019-2020 $287,186 $61,563
2020-2021 $371,654 $42,472
317

Page 5 of 8 ends

Fireworks Administration – Fire Prevention personnel administer the permitting of annual fireworks booths throughout the City. Individual booths are inspected prior to opening and throughout the sales period as needed. Each site is inspected following the 4th of July to assure proper cleanup of all related materials has taken place so a refund of deposits can be approved.

Table 5: Firework Booths
Fiscal Year # of Booths
2016-2017 14
2017-2018 13
2018-2019 13
2019-2020 13
2020-2021 15
Weed Abatement – Abatement notices are sent out annually in March to notify individuals of the need for vegetation abatement on their property. Owners who do not notify the Fire Prevention Bureau of compliance within the established time frame will have their property inspected to determine compliance. Individuals not in compliance are sent a notice of violation advising them that a contractor may abate the property and that they are responsible for the associated costs.

Fire Prevention Fees and Miscellaneous – The Fire Prevention Bureau performs business license application inspections for all new businesses. Inspections occur any time a new business locates within the City or changes operations that requires a new license. The inspections result in the business being added to the permitted occupancies list or put into the self-inspection program. The self-inspection program is organized through the business license application process and requires an on-site fire inspection every three years.

C. Community Education
The ACFD Public Education Assistant coordinates community relations and public education requests and services. The individual works out of the Fire Administration Office. There are a variety of educational and training programs provided to the City of Dublin. The following is a brief list of the programs offered:
 Station Tours and Apparatus Visits
 Personnel Emergency Preparedness (PEP) Presentations
 LISTOS Emergency Preparedness Training
 Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Training
 Community CPR (Hands-Only CPR)
 Career Day Speakers
 Public Information Notifications via Social Media & AC Alert  Dublin High School’s Every 15 Minutes
318

Page 6 of 8 ends

 Updating of City of Dublin website (ACFD pages)
 Community Festival/Fair Participation
Cost of Services
The ACFD annual budget submission to the City has followed the internal timelines and deadlines established by the City. ACFD Staff and City Staff have worked cooperatively during each year’s budget development process to ensure that all questions and issues are resolved to the satisfaction of the City. Table 6 below summarizes the ACFD contract and budget variance over the reporting period.

Table 6: Reporting Period Budget Verses Actuals
FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21
Budget $12,383,832 $12,799,979 $13,395,733 $13,976,466 $14,435,233 Actual $12,207,023 $12,488,101 $13,055,955 $13,551,338 $14,088,364 Variance ($176,809) ($311,878) ($339,778) ($425,128) ($346,869) Variance % -1.4% -2.4% -2.5% -3.0% -2.4%
Comparative Cost Analysis
The ACFD realizes the importance to the City of Dublin of ensuring services are being delivered in the most cost effective and efficient manner possible. To demonstrate the value of the contract for service between the City of Dublin and the ACFD, a comparison to another agency for cost per FTE and cost per company is provided in Table 7 below using FY 2021-2022 adopted fire services operating budgets. Both comparisons demonstrate the benefits of contracting for service with ACFD.

Table 7: Comparative Cost Analysis
Operating
Budget
Number of
FTE
Cost per FTE Number of
Companies
Cost per
Company
City of Dublin $14,857,801 45 $330,173 4 $3,714,450
City of Fremont $58,838,000 162 $363,198 13 $4,526,000
This assessment does not consider the enhanced services provided by ACFD that Fremont doesn’t offer like an urban search and rescue company, bulldozer, water rescue, and immediate access to any other ACFD resources.

The overall cost and resource benefit of the contract clearly demonstrates an advantage to the City of Dublin in contracting with ACFD. ACFD provides a unified response to emergency, centralized management of resources, reduction of duplication, “economies of scale” which improve cost containment, the ability to provide specialized services and retention of local control through a well-structured contract.

Reports, Records, and Oversight
County Audit
319

Page 7 of 8 ends

ACFD is audited on an annual basis by an independent financial auditor. Additionally, the Alameda County Auditor-Controller’s Office conducts periodic audits of ACFD’s specific operational and/or fiscal areas (i.e., fixed assets audit, payroll audit, etc.). City Staff has reviewed the most recent ACFD financial audit as part of the contract review.

Fire Department Complaints
All complaints received by the ACFD are forwarded to a Deputy Fire Chief. Each complaint is followed up on and documented by the Deputy Chief handling the complaint. During the term of this review, no formal complaints concerning the City of Dublin were received. It is ACFD policy that the City Manager would be fully informed about any complaints and subsequent remedies.

ACFD Fire Advisory Commission
The ACFD Fire Advisory Commission meets on a quarterly basis on the third Thursday of February, May, August, and November. The City of Dublin holds a seat on the Commission. The Dublin City Council appoints the representative to the Commission.

Inventory and Facilities
In 1997, and after the dissolution of Dougherty Regional Fire Authority (DRFA,) the City created a comprehensive inventory listing of those fixed assets owned by the City of Dublin. Over the past 25-year period, the City has tracked the Fire Services inventory through the City’s Equipment Internal Service Schedule, the Fire Station Building Replacement Schedule and the City’s Fixed Asset System. ACFD has provided the City with complete inventories of each new apparatus purchased by the City.

Buildings and Real Property
Fire Stations 16, 17 and 18 are owned and maintained by the City of Dublin and the City budgets annually for facility maintenance and capital projects. Day-to-day maintenance is handled by the City’s contract with the MCE Corporation through the Public Works Department.

Apparatus and Equipment
Apparatus and equipment within the City are owned by the City of Dublin. Maintenance of fire apparatus is provided by ACFD mechanics and billed to the City of Dublin.

Payment of services
The existing contract language specifies that ACFD will provide the City an expenditure breakdown and invoice for current services on a quarterly basis.

Evidence of Insurance
Staff has reviewed the evidence of insurance and self-insurance certificate that reflects the County of Alameda’s self-insured liability and workers’ compensation policy limits.

Dispatch
The Alameda County Regional Emergency Communications Center (ACRECC), a nationally accredited and distinguished Center of Excellence, is managed by the ACFD and has served as the Alameda County regional fire and emergency services (EMS) dispatch center since 2002. In addition to the City of Dublin, the County EMS Agency, the Cities of Alameda, Livermore, 320

Page 8 of 8 ends

Pleasanton, Fremont, and Camp Parks are also participants in ACRECC. Alameda County’s private ambulance provider, Falck Northern California, LLC, is also dispatched out of ACRECC.

Dispatching fire, EMS, and ambulance calls from the same center provides for better coordination and quicker response times to emergency incidents.

The Table 8 below summarizes the cost per call for each year of the reporting period.

Table 8: Cost per Call for Service
Fiscal Year Cost Per Call
2016-2017 $38.74
2017-2018 $39.83
2018-2019 $42.07
2019-2020 $42.93
2020-2021 $44.22
ACFD will continuously work on integrating other fire departments into ACRECC to ensure providing the City with high quality, cost-effective fire dispatch services, state of the art emergency medical dispatch and excellent customer service.

The regional dispatch center provides the City of Dublin with high quality cost-effective fire dispatch services, state of the art emergency medical dispatch and excellent customer service.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.
321

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 4 ends

Agenda Item 4.13
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Annual Update to the Master Fee Schedule
Prepared by: Chris Rhoades, Financial Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider adopting an annual update to the Master Fee Schedule as prescribed by the City’s User Fee Cost Recovery Policy (Resolution 160-12).

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Adopting an Annual Update to the Master Fee Schedule for Services Provided by the City.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The financial impact will be based on the activity levels after the fee updates are adopted and in place. The annual increase of 5.52% is calculated based on changes in the December Consumer Price Index (Bureau of Labor Statistics, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers). The recommendations do not establish all fees at 100% recovery and the City would continue to subsidize some services in accordance with the adopted policy (Resolution 160-12).

DESCRIPTION:

In September 2012 the City Council adopted a User Fee Cost Recovery Policy (Fee Policy) that calls for an update to the Master Fee Schedule annually to keep pace with increases in the City’s costs for providing services. The Fee Policy also states that changes to fees should be calculated based on changes in the preceding December Consumer Price Index (Bureau of Labor Statistics, San Francisco-Oakland Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers), which was recently updated to include Hayward and was renamed to the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers). The Consumer Price Index (CPI) year over year increase for December 2021 was 5.52%.
322

Page 2 of 4 ends

Based on the Fee Policy all fees that are updated annually are increased by the CPI to create the base fee, except where specifically stated otherwise in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The base fees are then rounded down to the nearest dollar and are listed on the Master Fee Schedule. In subsequent years, the prior year’s base fee is multiplied by the CPI to create the new year’s base fee, which is rounded down to the nearest dollar. City of Dublin Master Fee Schedule Prior to Rounding (Attachment 3) provides each fees base costs prior to rounding. Additionally, the Fee Policy allows, as necessary, for new fees to be added to the City’s Master Fee Schedule. This process is continued until a new fee study is completed. The current fee study was presented and adopted by City Council on June 19, 2018 (Resolution 85-18).

New Items for This Update
Staff is recommending the addition of one fee associated with the Building and Safety division’s processing of parking lot pavement repair and restriping permits and the adjustment of one fee associated with the Building and Safety division’s permitting of residential solar systems.

The new fee for parking lot pavement repair and restriping is needed to capture the transfer of plan check, permit processing, and inspections to Building and Safety from Public Works. Staff is recommending the new fee be time and materials costs, with a two-hour minimum. This is comparable to other fees within Building and Safety and allows for estimation based upon the size of a project.

The adjustment to the fee for building permits for residential solar systems brings the fee into alignment with the definition of a solar system, newly defined by Government Code 66015; which includes the photovoltaic system, distribution panels, and storage units (batteries). The adjustment brings the fee up to the government code limit of $450 from $268. Since the solar system is now inclusive of storage units (batteries), the total fee remains in alignment with prior years, where a separate fee for the storage units would have been applied.

Parks and Recreation Program Fees
At its June 21, 2016, City Council meeting the City Council, for the first time, also included the Parks and Recreation Program Fees as part of the Master Fee Schedule. Previously, the Parks and Recreation Program Fees were listed separate from the Master Fee Schedule as they were adopted by the Parks and Community Services Commission (the Commission).

The Parks and Recreation Program Fees are set based on the Parks and Community Services Pricing Policy (the Pricing Policy) which was adopted by the City Council on September 21, 2010 and revised on June 21, 2016. The revised and simplified Pricing Policy allows the fees to be set annually as part of the Master Fee Schedule; provides a certain level of authority to the Parks and Community Services Director to increase rates during the year (up to 20%), provided that these fees are then documented in the upcoming Master Fee Schedule; allows the Parks and Community Services Director to establish rates during the fiscal year should new classes be added during that period; and allows for the City Council to adopt fees associated with current facility use policies as part of the Master Fee Schedule.
323

Page 3 of 4 ends

Below is a summary of the proposed adjustments for Fiscal Year 2022-23, which were presented to the Parks and Community Services Commissions on May 16, 2022.

Adopt a Bench
The Adopt-a-Bench program is designed to allow the public to honor special people or events in their lives and provide long-lasting beautification to Dublin parks. Through the program, any individual, family, business, or community group can provide a donation to adopt a park bench, including a personal message on an engraved plaque. Donors can adopt an existing bench or purchase a new one. These fees were approved by the City Council on January 11, 2022. Fee:

Existing bench - $1,500; New bench - $2,500.

Old St. Raymond’s Church Outdoor Patio
Improvements were made to the patio space adjacent to the Old St. Raymond’s Church at Heritage Park. Staff is proposing to offer the recently renovated outdoor patio as a stand-alone rental not associated with the use of the church. The patio will be available for rent Monday-Thursday only, so as not to conflict with weekend rentals when the patio is included in the rental fee. Fee: Ranges from $17 - $96 per hour; Deposit of $500.

Shannon Center Outdoor Patio
The outdoor patio at the Shannon Community Center is currently included in the rental fee of Ambrose Hall. Staff is proposing to offer the patio as a stand-alone rental to provide additional space for meetings outside of using the main room. The patio will be available for rent Monday- Thursday only, so as not to conflict with weekend rentals when the patio is included in the rental fee. Fee: Ranges from $17 – $197 per hour; Deposit of $500.

Outdoor Boardwalk at the Wave
To maximize rental space at the Wave, Staff is proposing to offer the dry patio spaces (Boardwalk area) within the secured fenced area for rent outside of traditional waterpark hours.

There would be no access to water features or pools but will include amenities such as concrete ping pong tables, fire pits, and existing seating areas. Fee: Ranges from $275 - $396.

Additional Amenity Items for Facility Rentals
PCSD has additional items for use to enhance the renter’s experience. These items have direct costs associated with their use, such as Staff time for set up and take down, maintenance and cleaning, and replacement. The proposed fees are to cover the direct costs to use these items.

Items include but are not limited to linens, patio heaters, dance floor, stage, and pianos. The range of fees provides flexibility based on the direct costs of each item and the inclusion of additional items in the future. Fee: Ranges from $15 - $200.

Picnic Area
With existing and future park construction, new picnic areas will soon be available for use. The updated picnic rental fees reflect a picnic area with seating for 18, which previously was not available. Fee: Ranges from $12 for four hours to $36 for four hours.

In addition, staff has included administrative clean-up items to delete programs and activities that 324

Page 4 of 4 ends

have been discontinued (such as Little Lovies and the Bocce Ball League) and to delete other activities that have been consolidated.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Adopting an Annual Update to the Master Fee Schedule for Services provided by the City
2) Exhibit A to the Resolution – City of Dublin Master Fee Schedule, FY 2022-23 3) City of Dublin Master Fee Schedule Prior to Rounding 325
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

ADOPTING AN ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR SERVICES

PROVIDED BY THE CITY
WHEREAS, the California Constitution authorizes local government to recover the reasonable costs of providing services; and
WHEREAS, the City processes various permits, applications, and licenses, and offers various recreational program and facility rental opportunities; and WHEREAS, on September 4, 2012, the City Council approved Resolution 160 -12 Establishing a User Fee Cost Recover Policy (Fee Policy) that specifies annual adjustments to fees for services provided by the City; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2018, the City Council adopted the comprehensive updated Master Fee Schedule; and
WHEREAS, the Fee Policy, allows new fees to be added to the City’s Master Fee Schedule, when necessary, before the next comprehensive fee study in undertaken; and WHEREAS, the new fees have been added to the Master Fee Schedule set forth in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, fees and charges for recreation programs set forth in Exhibit A were reviewed by the Parks and Community Services Commission on May 16, 2022, prior to being presented to the City Council for consideration; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin adopts the Master Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the updated fees identified in said Master Fee Schedule, shall be effective beginning July 1, 2022. For those items billed as “time and materials,” the fees and overhead rates shown in Exhibit A shall be applicable to services provided beginning July 1, 2022.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that except as otherwise designed in Exhibit A, the fees therein shall be automatically adjusted annually using the adjustment methodology in Resolution No. 160-12 Establishing a User Fee Cost Recovery Policy adopted by the City Council on September 4, 2012.
326
Attachment 1
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
327
Exhibit A
CITY OF DUBLIN MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, FY 2022-23
Adjusted by CPI change, Dec 2020 - Dec 2021 (+5.52%)
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 1.0: General & Administrative
120 Photocopies – (first page or 1-page document) Reproduction of documents / cost for first page $0.50* $0.50* 121 Photocopies – (each additional page ) Reproduction of documents / cost per page after first page $0.10* $0.10* 122 Mailing of photocopies Documents where a physical copy is requested to be mailed / per mailing Actual Postage Actual Postage 123 Retrieval of public documents (Info Only - Established by State Law) Costs incurred for locating or collecting records / staff time
No Charge – Is included in per page
cost
No Charge – Is included in per page
cost
124 Copies of Political Reform Act 1974 Documents (Ca Govt Code 81008) (Info Only - Established by State Law), any related documents / per page $0.10* $0.10* 125 Political Reform Act Retrieval (Ca Govt Code 81008) (Info Only - Established by State Law) - retrieval of documents over 5 years old / per request includes multiple documents requested at the same time $5.00** $5.00** 126 Bound documents, reports including Budget; CAFR; etc. General documents which shall not exceed the combined cost if the per page rate in #120 is used / per document
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
Special Copies:
· Pla ns and Specifications For Construction
· M aps
· A erial Photographs
128 General Overhead Unless defined elsewhere General City Overhead to be used for developing equivalent fees and charges / applied to actual costs

64.8%* 64.8%*
129 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / Case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead.

As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
130 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Fee Per kilowatt Hour fee (kWh) to help recover the cost of electricity to the City
30 cents per kWh while plugged in
to City-owned EV charging stations
32 cents per kWh while plugged in
to City-owned EV charging stations
131 Passport Execution Fee The Department of State has set the acceptance fee at $35 for jurisdiction who process Passport application $35.00** $35.00**
132 Passport Application Fee
The Application Fee which is collected on behalf of the US Department of State, will be charged at the current rate as specified by the US Department of State. These costs may also include any charges for delivery of the application.

Actual Cost Actual Cost
127 Construction project plans and specifications; maps; may include oversized pages / per document
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 1 of 34
Attachment 2
328
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 1.1: Finance / Business License
160 First Returned Check Fee (Ca. Civil Code 1719 (a)(1) (Info Only - Established by State Law) Payments received via check when the payment is declined is declined by the bank / per check $25.00
Set by State Law**
$25.00
Set by State Law**
161 Subsequent Returned Check Fee (Ca. Civil Code 1719 (a)(1) (Info Only - Established by State Law) Payments received via check when the payment is declined is declined by the bank / per check after first $35.00
Set By State Law**
$35.00
Set By State Law**
162 Annual Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(A)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Annual Business License / per business $27.00 $28.00
164 New Business Registration (License) Registration fee $96.00 $102.00 165 Itinerant Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(B)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Daily to a maximum of 5 days / per day
$40.00/day - Max.
$200 per year
$40.00/day - Max.
$200 per year
166 Temporary Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.250(C) (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Temporary places of sale / daily $46.00/day $46.00/day 167 Master Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(D)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Master license for organizer / per permitted event $40.00 $42.00
168 Business License Transfer Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.280 (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Transfer is substantially similar to the ownership existing before the transfer / per transfer $64.00 $67.00 169 Duplicate Business License Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.290 (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Replace any license previously issued license $23.00 $25.00
170 Delinquent Business License Processing Fee 22.00* 22.00* 171 Contract Retention Escrow Fee Contractors may elect to have retention amounts paid to a third party escrow / per payment $66.00 $69.00
Section 1.2: Administrative Fees - Impact Fee Credit Agreement Administration 408 Impact Fee Credit Statement Per statement - Developers who request statements for credit balance $124.00 $131.00 409 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Park Land/Affordable Unit Impact Fee Credit Flat fee $310.00 $327.00
410 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Traffic Impact or Park Improvement Impact Fee Credit Flat fee $310.00 $327.00
411 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Fire Impact Fee Credit Flat fee $310.00 $327.00 412 Impact Fee Credit Application Processing Fee Per invoice $141.00 $148.00 413 Impact Fee Credit Invoice Change Fee Flat fee $175.00 $185.00 Section 2.0: Police Services- General (Fingerprints / Records / Vehicles/ Development) 201 Livescan (Fingerprints) Fingerprinting / per application - Outside Agency /DOJ Fees charged separately $31.00 $33.00
202 Fingerprint Card Card / non-electronic prints - Outside Agency/DOJ Fees charged separately $47.00 $50.00 203 Police Report / Inspection Verification Authorized release of a copy of a Police Report / per report $5.00 Flat** $5.00 Flat** Per Senate Bill 234, the City cannot impose a business license fee for small or large family daycare *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 2 of 34
329
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
204 Records Subpoena (Subpoena Duces Tecum) Ca. Govt Code 6254(f) (1) and (2) (Info Only - Established by State Law) Response to subpoena) $15.00** $15.00** 205 Records subpoena: photos saved to CD Duplication of photo records / per CD $72.00 $76.00 206 Visa Letter Preparation of a Visa letter requested for foreign travel / per letter $70.00 $74.00 208 Fix-It Ticket Sign-Off Sign-off on ticket not issued by Dublin Police Services / per citation $10.00 $10.00 209 Repossessed Vehicle Release - Ca. Govt Code 41612 (Info Only - Established by State Law) -Process and provide release document / per release $15.00** $15.00**
210 Towed / Stored Vehicle Release Provide release documentation for towed and/or stored vehicle / per vehicle $100.00 $100.00
Section 2.1: Police Services- Permits
220 Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) – One Day Permit Issuance of documents required for an application to ABC / per application (Police Chief may waive for Dublin-based non-profit) $85.00 $90.00 221 Bingo Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.44) Annual license issuance per the Municipal Code / per application $123.00 $130.00 222 Dance Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.52) Processing of a dance permit per the municipal code / per permit $123.00 $130.00 223 Fortune Teller Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.08) Processing of a fortune teller permit per the municipal code / per permit $123.00 $130.00 224 Gun Dealer Permit Processing of a Gun Dealer permit / per permit $247.00 $261.00 225 Massage Establishment – Initial (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.20) Processing of a massage establishment permit per the municipal code / per location $420.00 $443.00
226 Massage Establishment – Yearly (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.20) Annual permit after initial massage establishment permit / per permit $268.00 $283.00 228 Parade Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.12) Processing of a parade permit per the municipal code / per event (permit only - service charges per 5.12.100 additional) $230.00 $242.00 229 Peddler Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.16) Processing of a peddler permit per the municipal code / per application $247.00 $261.00 230 Secondhand Dealer Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.12) Processing of a secondhand dealer permit per the municipal code / per permit $247.00 $261.00
231 Taxi Company (Owner) Permit - Initial (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

6.76)
Processing of a taxi company (owner) permit per the municipal code / per initial permit $247.00 $261.00
232 Taxi Company (Owner) Permit – Renewal (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 6.76) Annual permit after initial Taxi Company (owner) permit / per permit $247.00 $261.00 233 Taxi Driver (Operator) Annual Permit – (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

6.76) Annual permit Taxi Driver (operator) permit / per permit $247.00 $261.00 234 Tobacco Retailer License (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.40) Annual license issuance per the Municipal Code / per license $311.00 $328.00 Section 2.2: Police Services- Hourly Rates
PS1 Sheriffs Technician Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $99.00 $105.00 *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 3 of 34
330
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
PS2 Sheriff’s Deputy Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $199.00 $210.00 PS3 Sheriffs Sergeant Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $230.00 $242.00 Section 4.1: Fire Prevention Services Plan Review & Inspection Plan Review & Inspection
240 New Construction up to 5000 sq. ft. Per application $607.00 $640.00 241 New Construction 5000 sq. ft. to 45,000 sq. ft. Per application $1,307.00 $1,379.00 242 New Construction >45,000 sq. ft. Per application $1,707.00 $1,801.00 243 Tenant Improvement up to 5000 sq. ft. Per application $407.00 $429.00 244 Tenant Improvement 5000 sq. ft. to 45,000 sq. ft. Per application $507.00 $535.00 245 Tenant Improvement >45,000 sq. ft. Per application $607.00 $640.00 246 Custom Single-Family Residence *** Per application $307.00 $324.00 247 Processing, Review, Inspection & Approval of Licensed Care Facilities New Fee $369.00 $389.00 248 Review and Approval of Improvement plans and/or maps New Fee $249.00 $263.00 Fire Alarm Systems – (New or Tenant Improvements)
250 Fire Alarm System < 50 devices Per application $607.00 $640.00 251 Fire Alarm System > 50 devices Per application $1,107.00 $1,169.00 252 High-rise System Per building $1,807.00 $1,907.00
Fixed Fire Protection Systems
260 Medical Gas System Per system $607.00 $640.00
261 Hood Duct System Per system $607.00 $640.00
262 Halon or Clean Agent Per system $707.00 $746.00
263 Spray Booth per booth Per system $507.00 $535.00
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, Commercial– (New or Tenant Improvements) 270 System < 20 heads Base fee per system $507.00 $535.00 271 System > 20 heads Base fee per system $1,007.00 $1,063.00 272 Plus amount per head in excess of 100 heads Per head $6.00 $6.00 273 Underground Water Supply Per system / tap $1,007.00 $1,063.00 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, Residential– (New and Alterations) 275 NFPA 13 D master plan check and inspection Per system $807.00 $851.00 276 Additional permits for already approved master plan Per application $607.00 $640.00 277 NFPA 13R system (per unit, per building) Per unit up to 50 units. $807.00 $851.00 278 NFPA 13 System Per unit up to 50 units /Per System $1,107.00 $1,169.00 279 Underground Water Supply Per system / tap $1,107.00 $1,169.00 The fees for all plan review and inspection, fire alarm systems, fixed fire systems, and automatic fire sprinkler systems include one inspection and one re- inspection for each inspection type (e.g. weld, hydro, rough, pre-pour, functional, final, etc.). If a permit applicant elects to split inspections into small pieces such as by floor or by system; additional inspection fees will be due based upon the hourly rate. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 4 of 34
331
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 4.2: Fire Prevention Services Regulated Activities 300 Annual Permits - Group 1 Aerosol, Open Flames & Candles, Fire Hydrants and Valves, Open Burning, Open Flames and Torches $105.00 $111.00
301 Annual Permits - Group 2
Carbon Dioxide Systems, Cellulose Nitrate Film, Combustible Fiber Storage, Compressed Gases, Cryogenics, Dry Cleaning Plants, Combustible Dust Producing Operations, Floor Finishing, Fruit & Crop Ripening, Fumigation, Repair Garages, HPM Facilities, Hot Work Operations, LP Gas, Liquid or Gas Fueled Equipment in assembly buildings, Lumberyards, Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities, Rooftop Heliports, Wood Products, Magnesium, Misc.

Combustible Storage, Organic Coatings, Industrial Ovens, Cutting and Welding, Storage of Scrap Tires
$159.00 $168.00
302 Annual Permits - Group 3 Temporary Membrane Structures and Tents >400 sq. ft. $213.00 $225.00 303 Annual Permits - Group 4
Aviation Facilities, Amusement Buildings, Carnivals & Fairs, Exhibits & Trade Shows, Explosives, Flammable or Combustible Liquids, Hazardous Materials, High Piled Storage, Places of Assembly, Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material, Pyroxylin Plastics, Refrigeration Equipment, Spraying & Dipping Operations, Production Facilities, Live Audiences $268.00 $283.00
304 Annual Permits - Group 5 Tire Rebuilding Plants $377.00 $398.00 305 Annual Permits - Group 6 Waste Handling $486.00 $513.00 306 Annual Permits - Group 7 Covered and Open Mall Buildings $704.00 $743.00 307 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / Case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead.

As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
Annual Notice of Inspection (Self Inspection)
344 Annual notice of inspection (Waived if business is subject to Annual Regulated Activity Permit)
Collected as supplement to the Annual Business Registration imposed under Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.250 / per year $38.00 $40.00
Section 4.3: Fire Works Displays & Sales
Fire Works Displays
*** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 5 of 34
332
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
350 Display Aerial Base Fee Per event $325.00 $343.00
351 Additional amount per shell group 60 shells If applicable added to base fee $140.00 $147.00 352 Additional amount per shell group 61-120 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.00 $263.00 353 Additional amount per shell group 121-181 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.00 $263.00 354 Additional amount per shell group 181-240 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.00 $263.00 355 Additional amount per shell group > 241 shells If applicable added to base fee $358.00 $378.00 Fire Works Sales
356 Fireworks Stand Application Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.24.070(B) (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Processing and administration of fireworks stands $144.00 $152.00
357 Fireworks Stand Inspection Cost to inspect sales locations $199.00 $210.00 Section 4.4: Fire Prevention Services- Hourly Rates
FR1 Deputy Fire Marshall Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $199.00 $210.00 FR2 Fire Code Compliance Officer Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $109.00 $115.00 Section 5.1: Housing Services Program Fees
501 Below Market Ownership Units - Transaction Fee Administration of the “For Sale” Inclusionary units / per unit per change in ownership – Including Initial $2,769.00 $2,922.00
502 Secondary Below Market Rate Unit - Transaction Fee Administration of the “Second Units” designated to meet Affordable Program requirements / per unit per change in ownership – including Initial
$1,547.00 $1,633.00
504 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 20 units or less Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $1,293.00 $1,365.00
505 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 21 to 100 units Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $2,102.00 $2,218.00
506 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 101 + units Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $3,028.00 $3,195.00
507 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring - Follow Up Compliance Fee First follow up (base fee); additional follow up audits T&M First Follow up $462.00 Additional - T&M
First Follow up $488.00
Additional - T&M
508 Below Market Rate Unit - Refinance Administrative Fee Administrative cost for document preparation and research when an inclusionary unit requires City approval / per request $1,032.00 $1,089.00 509 Secondary Below Market Rate Unit - Refinance Administrative Fee Administrative cost for document preparation and research when a secondary inclusionary unit requires City approval / per request $583.00 $615.00 510 First time home loan program - administrative fee Administrative charge for review and approval of first time home buyer loan / per loan approved
$1,955.00 $2,062.00
Section 6.1: Planning Division
Use Permits (TUP/CUP)
550 Minor Use Permit Per application $1,086.00 $1,146.00 551 Minor Use Permit – Minor Amendment Per application $271.00 $286.00 For all activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost shall be determined using composite City Staff rates and designated overhead factors.

T&M T&M
Zoning Clearance-General
570 Accommodations for persons with disabilities Review Per application No Fee No Fee 571 Banner / Balloon/Searchlight Per sign / balloon $108.00 $114.00 572 Indoor recreational Facilities/Day Care Center/Scarlett Court Per application $543.00 $573.00 574 Zoning Clearance-General Per application $81.00 $85.00 575 Zoning Clearance – Housing Projects Eligible for Streamlined Approval Per application T&M T&M 576 Zoning Clearance – SB 9 Unit Developments Per application T&M T&M Variance
580 Non-Residential Variance Per application T&M T&M
581 Residential Variance Per application T&M T&M
Site Development Review (SDR)
590 Site Development Review - General Per application T&M T&M 591 Site Development Review – Residential Additions > 500 sq. ft. Per application T&M T&M 592 Site Development Review – Single Sign (Master Sign Program is handled as a Site Development Review-General) Per Sign $352.00 $372.00 593 Site Development Review Waiver Per request $380.00 $401.00 594 Site Development Review Waiver for Projects' with Development Deposit Account Time & Material T&M T&M
595 Site Development Review – Time Extension (Administrative Determination) Per request $244.00 $257.00
596 Site Development Review – Time Extension (Planning Commission Determination) Per request $1,221.00 $1,289.00
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 7 of 34
334
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
597 Site Development Review Waiver – Permanent Outdoor Seating Per application. This fee shall be valid until the City’s applicable American Rescue Plan Act budget allocation is exhausted, or until September 30, 2022, whichever occurs first. Upon expiration, this fee shall be superseded by Fee #593 (Site Development Review Waiver).

T&M T&M

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROCESSING
600 Planned Development Application (Stage 1 / Stage 2) Per application T&M T&M 601 Planned Development Minor Amendment –(Administrative Determination) Per application $556.00 $586.00
602 Planned Development Minor Amendment for Project's with Development Deposit Account Time & Material T&M T&M
603 Planned Development Minor Amendment – (Planning Commission Determination) Per application T&M T&M
604 Planned Development Major Amendment – (City Council Determination) Per application T&M T&M
Section 6.2: Other Planning Fees
Other Charges
610 Appeal of Action by Applicant Per appeal T&M T&M
611 Appeal of Action by member of public (non-applicant) Per appeal $217.00 $229.00 612 Estoppel Certificate – Development Agreement Per certificate prepared when requested by entity not a party to the Development Agreement $253.00 $267.00
613 Heritage Tree Removal Permit Per tree $271.00 $286.00 614 Preparation of Mailing Address Labels (Noticing Requirements) Per set of labels $70.00 $74.00 615 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
616 General Plan Amendment Time & Material T&M T&M
617 Specific Plan Amendment Time & Material T&M T&M
618 Tentative Map Time & Material T&M T&M
619 Development Agreement Time & Material T&M T&M
620 Lot line adjustment Time & Material T&M T&M
621 Building division permit referral *** Per application $147.00 $155.00 *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 8 of 34
335
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 6.3: Planning Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead PL1 Composite City Planning Staff Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per Hour for T&M activities $299.00 $316.00 PL3 Overhead Rate - Applied to actual costs incurred for consultant services and expenses billed under T&M Percentage applied to City costs 30.0%* 30.0%* Section 7.1: Building and Safety Division – Building Permits (Total Valuation) Building Permits Based on Valuation Formula / $ Valuation *** 700 $0-$500 Per calculated valuation $50.00 $50.00
701 $501-$1,000 Per calculated valuation $109.00 $115.00 702 $1,001-$2,000 Per calculated valuation $168.00 $177.00 703 $2,001-$3,000 Per calculated valuation $230.00 $242.00 704 $3,001-$4,000 Per calculated valuation $261.00 $276.00 705 $4,001-$5,000 Per calculated valuation $318.00 $335.00 706 $5,001-$10,000 (first $5000) Per calculated valuation $318.00 $335.00 707 $5,001-$10,000 (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $55.00 $58.00 708 $10,001-$50,000 (first $10,000) Per calculated valuation $593.00 $625.00 709 $10,001-$50,000(each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $30.00 $32.00 710 $50,001-$100,000 (first $50,000) Per calculated valuation $1,793.00 $1,905.00 711 $50,001-$100,001 (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $29.00 $30.00 712 $100,001-$500,000 (first $100,000) Per calculated valuation $3,243.00 $3,405.00 Fees 708, 710, 712, 714, 722 are calculated using cost per $1000 of the preceding Fee. *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver.

Calculation of the Building Permit fee to be collected shall be in accordance with the Table below. The determination of the valuation and annual adjustments to the valuation shall be made by the Building Official as authorized in Dublin Municipal Code section 7.28.430(E). *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 9 of 34
336
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
713 $100,001-$500,000 (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $23.00 $25.00 714 $500,001 and up (first $500,000) Per calculated valuation $12,443.00 $13,405.00 715 $500,001 and up (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $13.00 $13.00 716 Demolition permits and removal of underground tanks Calculate using valuation factors above 50%
of the fee calculation based on
valuation
50%
of the fee calculation based on
valuation
Section 7.2: Building and Safety Division – Master Plan Check / Green Building Building Permits Based on Valuation Formula /$ Valuation Single Family detached tract housing (when using a Master Plan Check) 720 $100,001-$500,000 (first $100,000) Per calculated valuation $2,525.00 $2,664.00 721 $100,001-$500,001 (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $12.00 $12.00 722 $500,001 and up (first $500,000) Per calculated valuation $6,925.00 $7,464.00 723 $500,001 and up (each additional $1000 or fraction thereof) Per calculated valuation $4.00 $4.00 Building Permit State Surcharges
725 California Building Standards Commission Green Building Valuation Surcharge (Info Only) State fee required to be collected based on permit valuation $1.00**
for ea. $25,000 or
fraction thereof
$1.00**
for ea. $25,000 or
fraction thereof
726 Residential - California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Surcharge
(Info Only) State fee required to be collected based on permit valuation $0.13** per $1,000
$0.13**
per $1,000
727 Non-Residential - California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (SMIP) Surcharge
(Info Only) State fee required to be collected based on permit valuation $0.28** per $1,000
$0.28**
per $1,000
Section 7.3: Building and Safety Division – Residential Flat Fees Residential Building Permits - Flat Fees
730 Bathroom Remodel or Repair Per bathroom $406.00 $428.00 731 Electrical Appliances Per Appliance - Installation of electrical appliances per “Service Explanation” #1
$112.00 $119.00
732 Electrical Circuits (first) First or single circuit per “Service Explanation” #2 $112.00 $119.00 The provisions for residential flat fees may be applied when the specific work involved is for a single dwelling unit and /or appurtenant accessory structures where there is no other work except the item listed herein. “Service Explanations” follow the Table. *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 10 of 34
337
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
733 Electrical Circuits (each additional) Fee for each additional circuit per “Service Explanation” #2 $19.00 $20.00 734 Electrical Panels (first) First or single panel per “Service Explanation” #3 $167.00 $176.00 735 Electrical Panels (each additional) Fee for each additional panel per “Service Explanation” #3 $52.00 $55.00 736 Fireplace Insert Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #4 and #5 $211.00 $223.00 737 Garbage Disposal Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #1 $92.00 $97.00 738 Gas Piping System Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #6 $207.00 $218.00 739 Hot Tub / Spa Portable Per single installation “Service Explanation” #7 $207.00 $218.00 740 HVAC System Per system / “Service Explanation” #8 $220.00 $232.00 741 Kitchen Remodel or Repair (w/o structural modifications) Per permit, limited to one kitchen $685.00 $723.00 742 Lawn Sprinkler System Per system for any lawn sprinkler or irrigation system $105.00 $111.00 743 Motors Per “Service Explanation” #9 $220.00 $232.00 744 Plumbing Fixture Per “Service Explanation” #1 and #2 $101.00 $106.00 745 Roofing Replacement (Residential) For re-roofing a single family dwelling $234.00 $247.00 746 Shower / tub replacement only Per unit $167.00 $176.00 747 Solar System - Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic (Up to 15Kw) as defined by Government Code 66015 Per permit $268.00 $450.00** 748 Solar System - Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic (for each Kw above 15 or fraction thereof) as defined by Government Code 66015 Each Kw above 15 of fraction thereof $15.00** $15.00** 750 Solar Pool Heating System Per system (when not included with original pool permit) $323.00 $341.00 751 Solar Water Heaters Per application $275.00 $291.00 752 Ventilation Fan Per “Service Explanation” #10 $87.00 $92.00 753 Water Heater Per “Service Explanation” #8 $101.00 $106.00 754 Water Piping System Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #6 $207.00 $218.00 755 Window Replacements (first 5 windows) Per application containing 1-5 windows $200.00 $212.00 756 Window Replacements (each additional window) Additional per window charge added to base 1-5 window charge on same application
$10.00 $11.00

SERVICE EXPLANATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL FLAT FEES
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Section 7.4: Building and Safety Division – Non-Residential Flat Fees For installation, relocation or replacement of any motor (not an integral part of an integral part of an electrical appliance, fan, heating appliance, cooling appliance), generator, heater, electrical furnace, welding machine, transformer, and rectified (includes all necessary circuits, outlets, For the installation, relocation or replacement of each heating, cooling or refrigeration appliance (includes all necessary electrical circuits, outlets, fixtures, switches, receptacles, gas piping vents, water piping and duct work). OR (a) For the installation, relocation or replacement of each gas fired water heater (includes all necessary water and gas piping and vents). OR (b) For the installation relocation or replacement of each electrical water For installation, relocation or replacement of temporary power poles, power pedestals, subpanels or service upgrades (includes all necessary

For installation, relocation or replacement of ventilation fans connected to a single duct or outlets, switches, receptacles, fixtures and duct work).

For the installation, relocation or replacement of each vent or factory-built chimney.

For the installation of a solid burning fuel appliance (includes all necessary electrical circuits, outlets, fixtures, switches, receptacles factory-built For each installation or alteration of each water piping system, gas piping system, or refrigerant piping system or portion thereof where fixtures or For the installation, relocation or replacement of any spa / hot tub; includes all necessary outlets, receptacles, gas piping (only for spas supported on a slab. See Valuation Table for spas located on decking).

For installation, relocation, or replacement of any electrical appliance which requires plumbing installation such as garbage disposal, dishwasher, etc., (includes all necessary circuits, outlets, switches, receptacles, fixtures, water piping, and waste and vent piping).

For installation, alteration or replacement of an electrical circuit (includes all necessary outlets, switches, receptacles, and lighting fixtures). *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 11 of 34
338
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Non-Residential Building Permits - Flat Fees
763 Solar Panel - Non-Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic (up to 50 Kw) Per Permit $1,000.00** $1,000.00** 764 Solar Panel - Non-Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic (51 Kw-250 Kw) Per kilowatt between 51-250 $7.00** $7.00** 765 Solar Panel - Non-Residential Rooftop Photovoltaic (above 251 Kw) Per kilowatt above 251 $5.00** $5.00** 766 Replacement in - kind Heating and or Air conditioning units Per unit - “Service Explanation” #8 $675.00 $712.00 767 Water heaters - standard Per water heater - "Service Explanation" #8 $167.00 $176.00 768 Reroof Base (Initial square) Per initial square (10ft X 10ft) area $130.00 $137.00 769 Reroof – Additional beyond base Each additional square (10ft x 10ft) area or fraction thereof $13.00 $13.00 Section 7.5: Building and Safety Division – Construction Debris & Demolition 771 Residential per C&D phase/bond required Per Phase $414.00 $437.00 772 Residential non-bonded project **** Per application $229.00 $241.00 774 Commercial - bonded Per application $414.00 $437.00 775 Commercial - non-bond Per application $229.00 $241.00 Section 7.6: Building & Safety- Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead BS1 Composite City Building & Safety Staff Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $231.00 $244.00 BS2 Overhead Rate – Applied to actual costs incurred for consultant services and expenses billed under T&M Percentage applied to City costs 30.0%* 30.0%* Section 7.7: Building and Safety Division – Other Fees
780 Additional plan checking, alternate means and methods applications, or plan revisions Time and Materials T&M T&M
781 Certified Accessibility Specialist (CASp)- Meeting Initial meeting and review; all other work is T&M $1,384.00 $1,461.00 782 Code compliance survey Initial 100 sq. ft. $685.00 $723.00 For all activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost shall be determined using composite City Staff rates and designated overhead factors.

Overhead shall also be applicable to any work contracted by the City. An initial deposit shall be made by the applicant as determined by City Staff based on the scope and complexity of the project. Additional deposits shall be collected as necessary during processing. Any applicant funds remaining after completion of the project shall be refunded to the applicant. *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 13 of 34
340
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
801 Copies of Map - plotted GIS map
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
Not to exceed actual cost – As
determined by City Manager or
designee
802 Research Fee Per 1/2 Hour $158.00 $167.00
803 Subdivision and Development Improvement Plan Review/Revision & Plan Check after 4th revision Time & Materials T&M T&M
804 Subdivision and Development Improvement Plan/Map Check Charge Time & Materials-> 3% of estimated cost of improvements ($2,500 minimum deposit; maximum $25,000) T&M T&M
805 Subdivision Inspections Charge Time & Materials-> 3% of estimated cost of improvements ($2,500 minimum initial deposit; maximum $100,000) T&M T&M
806 Special Study Review (i.e., Traffic Study) New Fee: $5,000 Initial Deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 807 Permit processing fee Includes cost of processing grading or encroachment permit or misc. permit $141.00 $148.00
808 Trenching / Road Cuts – Base transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, 1 - 100 sq. ft. Base Permit cost up to 100 sq. ft. $506.00 $534.00 809 Trenching / Road Cuts – Over 100 SF transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, >100 sq. ft. Additional permit cost per additional square foot in excess of 100 sq. ft. $2.00 $2.00 810 Construction concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter 1- 50 sq. ft Base Permit cost up to 50 sq. ft. $633.00 $668.00 811 Construction concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter greater than 50 sq. ft Additional permit cost per additional linear foot in excess of 50 sq. ft. $2.00 $2.00 812 Constructing concrete driveways: residential Per Driveway- Residential $759.00 $801.00 813 Constructing concrete driveways: commercial Per Driveway - Commercial $1,265.00 $1,335.00 814 Constructing drain inlets, manholes, and connections to same Connection of inlet $1,012.00 $1,068.00 815 Encroachment Permit Resurfacing Surcharge – 100 sq. ft. or less Per each permit where roadway asphalt is cut impacting 100 sq. ft. or less of roadway $108.00 $114.00
816 Encroachment Permit Resurfacing Surcharge – per sq. ft. after 100 sq. ft. In addition to base charge for up to 100 sq. ft. – an additional per sq. ft. $1.00 per square foot $1.00 per square foot 817 Transportation / Oversized Vehicle Permits: Annual (Info Only State Limits Max. Fee Per Calif. Vehicle Code 35795 (b)(1)); per annual permit application $90.00** $90.00**
818 Transportation / Oversized Vehicle Permits: Single trip (Info Only State Limits Max. Fee Per Calif. Vehicle Code 35795 (b)(1)); per single trip application $16.00** $16.00**
819 Block party / street closure Per application See Encroachment Fee See Encroachment Fee 820 Filming/Photography Within Public Right of Way - Professional Fee Per Application $748.00 $789.00 821 Filming / Photography Within Public Right of Way - Basic fee Per application See Encroachment Fee See Encroachment Fee 822 Building division permit referral – residential *** Per application $616.00 $650.00 823 Building division permit referral - non residential Per Application $926.00 $977.00 824 Personal Wireless Service Facility Permit $5,000 Initial Deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 825 Watercourse Protection Permit $15,000 Initial Deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 826 ADA site compliance review Per application $926.00 $977.00 827 Newsrack Permit Per application / single space in City-owned newsrack $380.00 $401.00 828 Inspection: Public improvements construction; grading; encroachment permits Per hour T&M T&M
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 14 of 34
341
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
829 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
830 Amended map or certificate of correction Fixed Fee $627.00 $662.00 831 Street Vacations/Abandonment, Right of Way Dedication Review $2,000 Initial Deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 832 Certificates of compliance, mergers, parcel map waivers $3,000 initial deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 833 Investigation fee/work without a permit (encroachment) Hourly Rate - 1 hr. minimum. Over 1 hour (Time & Materials) Base $253.00 Over 1 Hour T&M
Base $267.00
Over 1 Hour T&M
834 Traffic control plan review (encroachment) Fixed Fee $371.00 $391.00 835 Processing extension of subdivision improvement agreement or development agreement (subdivision) Time & Materials T&M T&M 836 Warranty inspection and project closeout (subdivision) Fixed Fee $926.00 $977.00 837 Condition of approval compliance review or single parcel review (no improvement plans) Hourly Rate - 1 hr. minimum. Over 1 hour (Time & Materials) Base $317.00 Over 1 Hour T&M
Base: $334.00
Over 1 Hour T&M
838 Grading Plan Review/Site Work Permit Review $5,000 initial deposit (Time & Materials)/$2,500 initial deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M
839 Grading Inspection $15,000 initial deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 840 Erosion Control Review and Inspection $1,000 initial deposit (Time & Materials) T&M T&M 841 Nuisance Abatement - Tree trimming, Sidewalk Repair See muni code See Muni Code See Muni Code Section 8.2: Engineering- Cash Bond Required For Encroachment Permit (If No Surety Bond) 850 Transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, and other street excavation work – 50 square feet of less Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00* $500.00* *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 15 of 34
342
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
851 Transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, and other street excavation work – in excess of 50 square feet Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00 + $5.00/ sq. ft. in excess of 50 sq. ft.*
$500.00 + $5.00/ sq. ft.
in excess of 50 sq. ft.*
852 Concrete Sidewalk 50 square feet or less Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00* $500.00* 853 Concrete Sidewalk more than 50 square feet Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00 + $5.00/ sq. ft. in excess of 50 sq. ft.*
$500.00 + $5.00/ sq. ft.
in excess of 50 sq. ft.*
854 Concrete Curb and / or gutter of 30 linear feet or less Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00* $500.00* 855 Concrete Curb and / or gutter more than 30 linear feet Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00 + $20.00/ linear ft. in excess of 30 linear ft.*
$500.00 + $20.00/ linear ft. in
excess of 30 linear ft.*
856 Residential Concrete Driveway Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $500.00 Minimum*
$500.00
Minimum*
857 Commercial Concrete Driveway Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $1,000.00 Minimum*
$1,000.00
Minimum*
858 Drop inlets, manholes and connections to same Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions $1.000.00 Minimum*
$1.000.00
Minimum*
859 Temporary street or lane closures Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions No Deposit / Bond Required No Deposit / Bond Required 860 Miscellaneous encroachment work Minimum Bond Amount Per Application - See Section 8.2(A): Conditions Amount to be determined by the
Public Works Director in
accordance with the nature and
scope of work
Amount to be determined by the
Public Works Director in
accordance with the nature and
scope of work
Section 8.2(A): Conditions: -Cash Bond Required For Encroachment Permit Section 8.3: Engineering- Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead EN1 Composite City Engineering Staff (Excludes Inspectors) Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $317.00 $334.00 EN2 Composite City Public Works / Engineering Inspectors Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $253.00 $267.00
EN5 Overhead Rate - Applied to actual costs incurred for consultant services and expenses billed under T&M Percentage applied to City costs 26%* 26%* Section 8.4: Environmental Programs- Fees
870 Building division permit referral Flat Fee $493.00 $520.00 871 Stormwater Treatment Measure Inspection Per Hour $253.00 $267.00 872 Storm Drain Medallion Each Medallion $10.00 $11.00
- Conditions For Release: Bonds shall be released six months after the work has been accepted by the City, provided there are no defects in the work. - Annual Bonds: A minimum annual cash deposit of $5,000.00 may be posted in lieu of a cash or a surety bond for each permit. The City may require additional bonds or cash deposits
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 16 of 34
343
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
873 Stormwater Facility Inspections: Restaurant/Commercial Flat Fee $414.00 $437.00 874 Trash Capture/Enclosure Inspection Flat Fee $210.00 $222.00 875 Review of Annual Maintenance Reports of privately maintained post- construction Flat Fee $234.00 $247.00
876 Initial Annual Self Haul Permit Annual Permit $611.00 $645.00 877 Annual Self Haul Permit Renewal Annual Permit $365.00 $385.00 878 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
Section 8.5: Environmental Programs- Composite Hourly Rates ENV1 Environmental Coordinator Per Hour $213.00 $225.00 ENV2 Environmental Technician Per Hour $183.00 $193.00
ENV3 Office Assistant II Per Hour $127.00 $134.00
Section 9.1: City Attorney – Development Application Processing CA1 Overhead Rate – Applied to City Attorney Costs associated with Planning and Engineering Applications
Percentage applied to City costs 44%* 44%*
CA2 Equivalent Fees and Charges
Fees for services or costs not explicitly listed in any section in the Master Fee Schedule / case by case basis, may include: staff costs; contractor / consultant costs; reimbursable expenses; general overhead As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
As determined by City Manager or
designee based on actual costs and
rates plus general overhead
Section 10.1: Parks & Recreation Program Fees - Activity Fees** Family Programs
For all development related activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost of the City Attorney shall be determined by applying the designated overhead factor to the Cost for City Attorney services incurred by the City. An initial deposit shall be made by the applicant as determined by City Staff based on the scope and complexity of the project. Additional deposits shall be collected as necessary during processing. Any applicant funds remaining after completion of the project shall be refunded to the applicant.

All Parks & Recreation Program Fees are subject to 20% increase based on the Parks & Community Services Pricing Policy. (1) Noted activities were added during the year at the Parks & Community Services Director's discretion, per Policy; or were new fees approved byt the City *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 17 of 34
344
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FP1 After School Recreation Full Session / 13 weeks each Resident $762
Non-Resident $914
(beginning 5/1/19)
Resident $794
Non-Resident $952
FP2 After School Recreation Late Fee / per minute Flat Fee $10 Plus $1 each minute
Flat Fee $10
Plus $1 each minute
FP3 Seasonal Half Day Camps Half Day - One week session Resident $101 Non-Resident $121
Resident $105
Non-Resident $126
FP4 Seasonal Full Day Camps Full Day / One week session Resident $244 Non-Resident $293
Resident $338
Non-Resident $405
FP5 Seasonal Full Day Camp includes Waterpark Admission Full Day / One week session New Resident $408 Non-Resident $490
FP6 Camp Connector Lunch Connector / 1 hour Resident $20 Non-Resident $24
Resident $21
Non-Resident $25
FP7 Dublin L.E.A.D. Program Summer Session Resident $114 Non-Resident $137
Resident $119
Non-Resident $143
FP8 After School L.E.A.D. Full Session / 13 weeks each New Resident $592 Non-Resident $710
Preschool Programs
PP1 Preschool - 3-Year Old Classes 2 days per week session / 11 weeks each Resident $538 Non-Resident $646
Resident $631
Non-Resident $743
PP2 Preschool - 4-Year Old Classes 2 days per week session / 11 weeks each Resident $571 Non-Resident $685
Resident $665
Non-Resident $784
PP3 Preschool - 3-Year Old Classes 3 days per week session / 11 weeks each Resident $804 Non-Resident $965
Resident $908
Non-Resident $1,075
PP4 Preschool - 4-Year Old Classes 3 days per week session / 11 weeks each Resident $845 Non-Resident $1,014
Resident $950
Non-Resident $1,127
PP5 Preschool - 4-Year Old Classes 4 days per week session / 11 weeks each Resident $1,280 Non-Resident $1,536
Resident $1,404
Non-Resident $1,671
PP7 Camp Shamrock 1 week session (half day) Resident $123 Non-Resident $148
Resident $128
Non-Resident $154
Senior Center Programs
SC1 Activity Fee Per activity Resident $3-$15
Non-Resident $3.5-$18
Resident $3-$16
Non-Resident $4-$19
SC2 Special Luncheons Per Luncheon Resident $10-$20
Non-Resident $12-$24
Resident $10-$21
Non-Resident $13-$25
SC3 Dances Pre-Registrations / Per Person Resident $10-$25 Non-Resident $13-$30
Resident $10-$26
Non-Resident $13-$31
SC4 Dances At the Door / Per Person Resident & Non-Resident $15-$40 Resident $16-$42 Non-Resident $19-$50
SC5 Trips and Tours City Trips & Tours / Per trip Resident & Non-Resident $15-$100 Resident $16-$104 Non-Resident $19-$125
SC6 Trips and Tours - Additional fee Contracted Trips & Tours / Per trip Resident & Non-Resident $25-$300 Resident $26-$313 Non-Resident $31-$375
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 18 of 34
345
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Sports Programs
SP1 Adult Sports Basketball Adult League Resident $499-$699 Non-Resident $599-$839
Resident $520-$728
Non-Resident $624-$874
SP2 Adult Sports Softball Adult League Resident $499-$699 Non-Resident $599-$839
Resident $520-$728
Non-Resident $624-$874
SP3 Adult Sports Sports League Late Registration Fee Resident $25 Non-Resident $25
Resident $26
Non-Resident $26
SP4 Youth Sports Junior Warriors Basketball League - Winter Season Resident $183 Non-Resident $220
Resident $191
Non-Resident $229
SP5 Youth Sports Junior Warriors Basketball League - Summer Season Resident $127 Non-Resident $152
Resident $132
Non-Resident $158
SP6 Youth Sports Teeball League Resident $120
Non-Resident $144
Resident $125
Non-Resident $150
Wave
WV1 Waterpark Admission Fees (Full Day) Children under 2 Resident and Non-Resident Fee $3 Resident Fee $3 Non-Resident Fee $4
WV2 Waterpark Admission Fees (Full Day) Recreational Swimming Under 40" Resident Fee $13 Non-Resident Fee $15
Resident Fee $14
Non-Resident Fee $17
WV3 Waterpark Admission Fees (Full Day) Recreational Swimming Over 40" Resident Fee $15 Non-Resident Fee $17
Resident Fee $16
Non-Resident Fee $19
WV4 Waterpark Admission Fees (Full Day) Military Military Personnel, veterans, reservists, active duty military (up to 3 guests) (1) $10 $10
WV5 Waterpark Season Pass (Resident) Adminission Fees (1) (M-Th) Children under 2 Resident $20 Resident $21 WV6 Waterpark Season Pass (Resident) Adminission Fees (1) (M-Th) Recreational Swimming Under 40" (M-Th) Resident $75 Resident $78 WV7 Waterpark Season Pass (Resident) Adminission Fees (1) (M-Th) Recreational Swimming Over 40" (M-Th) Resident $85 Resident $89 WV8 Waterpark Family Season Pass Resident Only, M-Th, No Holidays Family waterpark summer season pass for residents only. $270 Resident $281 WV9 Swim Lessons 1 Instructor to 8 Participants Per Class $10 Resident $10 Non-Resident $13
WV10 Swim Lessons 1 Instructor to 6 Participants Per Class $14 Resident $15 Non-Resident $18
WV11 Swim Lessons 1 Instructor to 5 Participants Per Class $20 Resident $21 Non-Resident $25
WV12 Lessons 1 Instructor to 4 Participants Per Class $26 Resident $27 Non-Resident $33
WV13 Swim Lessons 1 Instructor to 2 Participants Per Class $35 Resident $36 Non-Resident $44
WV14 Lessons 1 Instructor to 1 Participants Per Class $55 Resident $57 Non-Resident $69
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 19 of 34
346
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
WV15 Swim Team Junior Green Gators Per Class Resident $12 Non-Resident $14
Resident $13
Non-Resident $16
WV16 Swim Team Green Gator Per Person Per Season New Resident $359 Non-Resident $431
WV17 Lap Swim/Water Walking Per visit charge. Purchase of $50 punch card allows 10 visits $6 Resident $6 Non-Resident $8
WV18 Birthday Party Package - Summer Season Party Packages / Per person Resident $30 Non-Resident $36
Resident $31
Non-Resident $38
WV19 Birthday Party Package - Off-Season Party Packages / Per person Resident $22 Non-Resident $26
Resident $23
Non-Resident $28
WV20 Public Address Announcements (1) 3 personal announcements (birthdays, reunions, personal messages) $25 Resident $26 Non-Resident $31
WV21 Recreational Swim (Under 2 Years) Per Person Per Visit Resident $3 Non-Resident $5
Resident $3
Non-Resident $4
WV22 Recreational Swim (Over 2 Years) Per Person Per visit / Purchase of $50 punch card allows 10 visits. $6 Resident $6 Non-Resident $8

HERITAGE PARK & MUSEUMS
HP1 Heritage Park Drop-In Programs Heritage Park Drop-In Programs Per Person $3.00 Resident $3 Non-Resident $4
HP2 Ghosts Of Dublin Tour Per Person Admission Fee Resident $14 Non-Resident $17
Resident $15
Non-Resident $18
HP3 Weekend History Events Per Person Per Event Resident $5 Non-Resident $6
Resident $5-$15
Non-Resident $6-$18
HP4 Group Tours Per Person Per Tour $5.00 Resident $5
Non-Resident $6
HP5 School Field Trips Per Student Per Field Trip $4.00 Resident $4 Non-Resident $5
HP6 Pioneer Activity Per Student Per Activity $1.50 Resident $1.50 Non-Resident $2.50
Contract Classes

VARIES VARIES
CF1 Interment Fees Cremation/Burial $330 $344
CF2 Interment Fees Earth Burial $4,985 $5,194
CF3 MEMORIAL BENCH MEMORIAL BENCH WITH ABILITY TO HOLD HUMAN REMAINS $3,300.00 No Change Section 10.2: Parks & Recreation Program Fees - Cemetery Fees for Heritage & Cultural Arts Center** For all Contract Instructor Activities, Fees for Residents and for Non-Residents may vary. The fees are based on the contract agreements with each instructor and are subject to change at the discretion of the Parks & Community Services Director. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 20 of 34
347
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
CF4 MEMORIAL BOULDER MEMORIAL BOULDER WITH ABILITY TO HOLD HUMAN CREMATIONS $2,800.00 No Change CF5 MEMORIAL TREE HAAWTHORN TREE WITH PLAQUE, NO HUMAN REMAINS $800.00 No Change CF6 MEMORIAL BRICK MEMORIAL BRICK WITH PERSONALIZED INSCRIPTION, NO HUMAN REMAINS $350.00 No Change
CF7 Adopt a Bench New or existing bench with a personal message engraved on a plaque / Per Bench New Existing Bench $1,500
New Bench $2,500
Additional Facility Rental Fees for Amenities
FR0 Dance Floor, Stage, Piano, Linens, Patio Heaters, Wedding Arch, Etc / Amenities for rent with facility rental Additional Items Available for Rent Per Amenity New $15-$200 Civic Center Rental (Council Chambers & Regional Meeting Room) *Deposit of $500 (Update) FR1
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meetings / Per Hour No Fee No Fee FR2
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising / Per Hour $68 $71
FR3 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $90
Non-Resident $108
Resident $94
Non-Resident $113
FR4 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $120 Non Dublin-based Business $144
Dublin-based Business $125
Non Dublin-based Business $150
Heritage Park & Museums Facility Rental - St. Raymond Church *Deposit of $500 (Update) FR5
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours for the purpose of meetings - Hourly Fee Setup and Takedown Fee Only / per hour per staff $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR6
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use During outside of business hours for the purpose of meetings - per hour per staff $15 $17.00
FR7
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Used for the purpose of fundraising - Per Hour $45 $47.00 Section 10.3: Parks & Recreation Program Fees - Facility Rental Fees** *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 21 of 34
348
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR8 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $60
Non-Resident $72
Resident $63
Non-Resident $75
FR9 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $80
Non Dublin-based Business $96
Dublin-based Business $83
Non Dublin-based Business $100
FR10 Individuals or Other Groups Discount on hourly rental rates when multiple rooms are rented. 10% discount on hourly rental rates 10% discount on hourly rental rates RP1
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Youth Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours for the purpose of meetings - Hourly Fee Setup and Takedown Fee Only / Per hour per staff New Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
RP2
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Youth Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours for the purpose of meetings - Per hour per staff New $17.00
RP3
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Youth Sports Leagues
Used for the purpose of fundraising / Per hour New $45.00 RP4 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour New Resident $60 Non-Resident $72
RP5 Commercial Uses Per Hour New Dublin-based Business $80 Non Dublin-based Business $96
RP6 Individuals or Other Groups Discount on hourly rental rates when multiple rooms are rented. New 10% discount on hourly rate Heritage Park & Museums Facility Rental - Kolb Sunday School Barn *Deposit of $500 (Update) FR11
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours for the purpose of meetings - Hourly Fee Setup and Takedown Fee Only / per hour per staff Setup/Takedown $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR12
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours for the purpose of meetings Per hour per staff $25 $26
FR13
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising
Per Hour $76 $79
Heritage Park & Museums Facility Rental - St. Raymond Church Outdoor Patio Monday-Thursday as a Standalone Deposit of $500 *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 22 of 34
349
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR14 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $100 Non-Resident $120
Resident $104
Non-Resident $125
FR15 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $134 Non Dublin-based Business $161
Dublin-based Business $140
Non Dublin-based Business $168
FR16 Individuals or Other Groups Discount on hourly rental rates when multiple rooms are rented. 10% discount on hourly rental rates 10% discount on hourly rental rates Heritage Park & Museums Facility Rental - Lawn Area *Deposit of $500 (Update) FR17
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours for the purpose of meetings - Hourly Fee Setup and Takedown Fee Only / Per hour per staff $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR18
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours for the purpose of meetings Per hour per staff $17
FR19
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations and Youth Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising
Per Hour $57 $59
FR20 Individuals or Other Groups Lawn Area per hour Resident $75 Non-Resident $90
Resident $78
Non-Resident $94
FR21 Commercial Uses Lawn Area per hour Resident $100
Non-Resident $120
Resident $104
Non-Resident $125
Library Community Room *Deposit of $500 (Update)
FR22
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meetings Per Hour No Fee No Change FR23
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $68/hour $71 FR24 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $90
Non-Resident $108
Resident $94
Non-Resident $113
FR25 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $120 Non Dublin-based Business $144
Dublin-based Business $125
Non Dublin-based Business $150
Senior Center Facility Rental - Ballroom *Deposit of $750 (Update) *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 23 of 34
350
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR26
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meetings Per Hour $46 $48
FR27
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $139 $145
FR28 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $185 Non-Resident $222
Resident $193
Non-Resident $231
FR29 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $246 Non Dublin-based Business $296
Dublin-based Business $256
Non Dublin-based Business $308
Senior Center Facility Rental - Kitchen(separate from Ballroom rental)Minimum 3 hour rental, only permitted on weekdays - *Deposit of $750 (NEW) FR30
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues - (NEW)
Use during regular business hours Per Hour $15 per hour $17 FR31
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use Outside of Regular Business Hours Per Hour $23 per hour $24 FR32 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $80/Non-resident $96 Resident $83 Non-resident $100
FR33 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $115 Non Dublin-based Business $138
Dublin-based Business $120
Non Dublin-based Business $144
Senior Center Facility Rental - Classroom A *Deposit of $750 (Update) FR34
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meeting in conjunction with rental of the Senior Center Ballroom. Per Hour. $9 $17
FR35
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meeting as a standalone rental during Senior Center business hours. Per Hour. $15 $17
FR36
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $23 $24
FR37 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $37 Non-Resident $44
Resident $39
Non-Resident $46
FR38 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $49 Non Dublin-based Business $59
Dublin-based Business $51
Non Dublin-based Business $61
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 24 of 34
351
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Senior Center Facility Rental - Classroom B *Deposit of $750 (Update) FR39
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meeting Per Hour $15 $17
FR40
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $23 $24
FR41 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $28 Non-Resident $34
Resident $29
Non-Resident $35
FR42 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $38 Non Dublin-based Business $46
Dublin-based Business $40
Non Dublin-based Business $48
Senior Center Facility Rental - Classroom C/D *Deposit of $750 (Update) FR43
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meeting Per Hour $15.00 $17
FR44
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $23.00 $24
FR45 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $37 Non-Resident $44
Resident $39
Non-Resident $46
FR46 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $49 Non Dublin-based Business $59
Dublin-based Business $51
Non Dublin-based Business $61
Senior Center Facility Rental - Meeting Room *Deposit of $750 (Update) FR47
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of meeting Per Hour $4 $17
FR48
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $13 $17
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 25 of 34
352
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR49 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $17 Non-Resident $20
Resident $18
Non-Resident $21
FR50 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $22 Non Dublin-based Business $27
Dublin-based Business $23
Non Dublin-based Business $28
Shannon Center Facility Rental - Ambrose Hall *Deposit of $750 FR51
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours -
Setup and Takedown Fee Only per attendant per hour Setup/Takedown $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR52
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours - Per attendant per hour $85 $89 FR53
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $188 $196
FR54 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $250 Non-Resident $300
Resident $261
Non-Resident $313
FR55 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $332 Non Dublin-based Business $400
Dublin-based Business $346
Non Dublin-based Business $415
Shannon Center Facility Rental - Outdoor Patio (separate from Ballroom rental) Monday-Thursday Deposit of $500 (NEW) FR56
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours -
Setup and Takedown Fee Only per attendant per hour New Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR57
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours - Per attendant per hour New $31 *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 26 of 34
353
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR58
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour New $92
FR59 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour New Resident $123 Non-Resident $148
FR60 Commercial Uses Per Hour New Dublin-based Business $164 Non Dublin-based Business $197
Shannon Center Facility Rental - Kitchen(separate from Ballroom rental)Minimum 3 hour rental, only permitted on weekdays - *Deposit of $750 (NEW) FR61
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues - (NEW)
Use during regular business hours. Per Hour. $15 $17
FR62
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use Outside of Regular Business Hours. Per Hour. $23 $24 FR63 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $80 Non-resident $96
Resident $83
Non-resident $100
FR64 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $115 Non Dublin-based Business $138
Dublin-based Business $120
Non Dublin-based Business $144
Shannon Center Facility Rental - Multipurpose Room *Deposit of $750 FR65
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours -
Setup and Takedown Fee Only per attendant per hour Setup/Takedown $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR66
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours - Per attendant per hour $23 $24 FR67
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $53 $55
FR68 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $70 Non-Resident $84
Resident $73
Non-Resident $88
FR69 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $93 Non Dublin-based Business $112
Dublin-based Business $97
Non Dublin-based Business $116
Shannon Center Facility Rental - Classroom *Deposit of $750 *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 27 of 34
354
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
FR70
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use during regular business hours -
Setup and Takedown Fee Only per attendant per hour Setup/Takedown $15 Hourly - Free Setup/Tear Down $17
FR71
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use outside of business hours - Per attendant per hour $14 $17 FR72
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Use for the purpose of fundraising Per Hour $23 $24
FR73 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $30 Non-Resident $36
Resident $31
Non-Resident $38
FR74 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $40 Non Dublin-based Business $48
Dublin-based Business $42
Non Dublin-based Business $50
Stager Gym Facility Rental *Deposit ($500) - New
FR75 Dublin Sports League Organizations, Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations Per Hour Resident Fee Only $40 Resident Fee Only $42 FR76 Individuals or Other Groups Per Hour Resident $60
Non-Resident $72
Resident $63
Non-Resident $75
FR77 Commercial Uses Per Hour Dublin-based Business $80 Non Dublin-based Business $96
Dublin-based Business $83
Non Dublin-based Business $100
Wave Rentals
WR1 Shaded Space Rentals WEEKDAY Cabanas (3) 10'x10' structure with privacy screening, patio furniture.
$80 Resident $83
Non-Resident $100
WR2 Shaded Space Rentals WEEKEND Cabanas (3) 10'x10' structure with privacy screening, patio furniture.
$90 Resident $94
Non-Resident $113
WR3 Shaded Space Rentals Luxury Lounges (10+) Portable shaded coverings with two lounges. $40 Resident $42 Non-Resident $50
WR4 Pool/Amenity Rentals
Full Park Buyout - includes: Paul McCreary Sports Pool, Natatorium, Children's Splash Zone, and Waterslide Tower / Per Hour (Deposit $750)
Resident & Non-Profit $1,200
Non-Resident $1,440
Commercial $1,750
Resident & Non-Profit $1,250
Non-Resident $1,500
Commercial $1,824
WR5 Pool/Amenity Rentals Children's Splash Zone / Per Hour (Deposit $500)
Resident & Non-Profit $330
Non-Resident $400
Commercial $500
Resident & Non-Profit $344
Non-Resident $413
Commercial $521
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 28 of 34
355
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
WR6 Pool/Amenity Rentals
Lower Level of Tower - includes: Mt. Diablue, Golden Wave, and Riptide Rider / Per Hour
(Deposit $500)
Resident & Non-Profit $380
Non-Resident $460
Commercial $560
Resident & Non-Profit $396
Non-Resident $475
Commercial $584
WR7 Pool/Amenity Rentals
Full Waterslide Tower - includes: Emerald Plunge, Shamrock Swirl, and Dublin Screamer /
Per Hour
(Deposit $500)
Resident & Non-Profit $450
Non-Resident $540
Commercial $680
Resident & Non-Profit $469
Non-Resident $563
Commercial $709
WR8 Pool/Amenity Rentals Natatorium Rental / Per Hour
(Deposit $500)
Resident & Non-Profit $280
Non-Resident $540
Commercial $680
Resident & Non-Profit $292
Non-Resident $354
Commercial $427
WR9 Pool/Amenity Rentals Lane Rental: Paul McCreary Sports Pool Per Lane / During Normal Operating Hours / Per Hour
Resident & Non-Profit $12/hour
Non-Resident $14/hour
Commercial $19/hour
Resident & Non-Profit $13
Non-Resident $15
Commercial $20
WR10 Pool/Amenity Rentals Paul McCreary Sports Pool / During Normal Operating Hours / Per Hour (Deposit $500)
Resident & Non-Profit $280
Non-Residential $340
Commercial $410
Resident & Non-Profit $292
Non-Residential $350
Commercial $427
WR11 Other Amenities & Services Community Room Rental Deposit of $500 (New)
Resident & Non-Profit $100
Non-Resident $118
Commercial $154
Resident & Non-Profit $104
Non-Resident $125
Commercial $160
WR12 Other Amenities & Services Picnic Area Rental (added to other rental) Add-on Amenity, Flat $25/hr To be Deleted WR13 Other Amenities & Services Additional Staff / per hour $30 $34 WR14 Other Amenities & Services Additional Set-Up Fee for Technology and Equipment Package / Per Day New $500 WR15 Wave Locker Fees Locker fees for the storage of guest items / Per Locker Storage fee based on locker size $5-
$15
Storage fee based on locker
size $6-$20
Section 10.4: Parks & Recreation Program Fees - Picnic Area Rental Fees** Park Picnic Area Rentals
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 29 of 34
356
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
PR1
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 200)
$100/4 hours
$25 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$226/4 hours
$57 each additional hour
$100/4 hours
$25 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$226/4 hours
$57 each additional hour
PR2
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 96)
$48/4 hours
$12 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$108/4 hours
$27 each additional hour
$48/4 hours
$12 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$108/4 hours
$27 each additional hour
PR3
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 80)
$44/4 hours
$11 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$85/4 hours
$21 each additional hour
$44/4 hours
$11 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$85/4 hours
$21 each additional hour
PR4
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 64)
$32/4 hours
$8 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$73/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
$32/4 hours
$8 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$73/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
PR5
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 56)
$28/4 hours
$7 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$64/4 hours
$16 each additional hour
$28/4 hours
$7 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$64/4 hours
$16 each additional hour
PR6
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 48)
$24/4 hours
$6 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$54/ 4 hours
$14 each additional hour
$24/4 hours
$6 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$54/ 4 hours
$14 each additional hour
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 30 of 34
357
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
PR7
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic - Area (seats 36)
$18/4 hours
$5 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$41/4 hours
$10 each additional hour
$18/4 hours
$5 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$41/4 hours
$10 each additional hour
PR8
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 24)
$12/4 hours
$3 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$28/4 hours
$7 each additional hour
$12/4 hours
$3 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$28/4 hours
$7 each additional hour
PR9
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Picnic Area (seats 18) / 4 HoursPer each additional hour New $12/4 hours
$3 each additional hour
Use for the Purpose of Fundraising
$24/4 hours
$6 each additional hour
PR10 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 200) Resident $300/4 hours
$75 each additional hour
Non-Resident $360/4 hours
$90 each additional hour
Resident $300/4 hours
$75 each additional hour
Non-Resident $360/4 hours
$90 each additional hour
PR11 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 96) Resident $144/4 hours
$36 each additional hour
Non-Resident $173/4 hours
$43 each additional hour
Resident $144/4 hours
$36 each additional hour
Non-Resident $173/4 hours
$43 each additional hour
PR12 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 80) Resident $120/4 hours
$30 each additional hour
Non-Residents $144/4 hours
$36 each additional hour
Resident $120/4 hours
$30 each additional hour
Non-Residents $144/4 hours
$36 each additional hour
PR13 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 64) Resident $96/4 hours
$24 each additional hour
Non-Residents $115/4 hours
$29 each additional hour
Resident $96/4 hours
$24 each additional hour
Non-Residents $115/4 hours
$29 each additional hour
PR14 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 56) Resident $84/4 hours
$21/each additional hour
Non-Residents $101/4 hours
$25 each additional hour
Resident $84/4 hours
$21/each additional hour
Non-Residents $101/4 hours
$25 each additional hour
PR15 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 48) Resident $72/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
Non-Residents $86/4 hours
$22 each additional hour
Resident $72/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
Non-Residents $86/4 hours
$22 each additional hour
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 31 of 34
358
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
PR16 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic - Area (seats 36) Resident $54/4 hours
$14 each additional hour
Non-Resident $65/4 hours
$16 each additional hour
Resident $54/4 hours
$14 each additional hour
Non-Resident $65/4 hours
$16 each additional hour
PR17 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 24) Resident $36/4 hours
$9 each additional hour
Non-Resident $43/4 hours
$11 each additional hour
Resident $36/4 hours
$9 each additional hour
Non-Resident $43/4 hours
$11 each additional hour
PR18 Individuals or Other Groups Picnic Area (seats 18) / 4 HoursPer each additional hour New Resident $28/4 hours
$7 each additional hour
Non-Resident $36/4 hours
$9 each additional hour
PR19 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 200)
Resident $400/4 hours
$100 each additional hour
Non-Resident $480/4 hours
$120 each additional hour
Resident $400/4 hours
$100 each additional hour
Non-Resident $480/4 hours
$120 each additional hour
PR20 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 96)
Resident $192/4 hours
$48 each additional hour
Non-Resident $230/4 hours
$58 each additional hour
Resident $192/4 hours
$48 each additional hour
Non-Resident $230/4 hours
$58 each additional hour
PR21 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 80)
Resident $152/4 hours
$38 each additional hour
Non-Residents $182/4 hours
$46 each additional hour
Resident $152/4 hours
$38 each additional hour
Non-Residents $182/4 hours
$46 each additional hour
PR22 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 64)
Resident $127/4 hours
$32 each additional hour
Non-Residents $152/4 hours
$38 each additional hour
Resident $127/4 hours
$32 each additional hour
Non-Residents $152/4 hours
$38 each additional hour
PR23 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 56)
Resident $112/4 hours
$28 each additional hour
Non-Residents $134/4 hours
$34 each additional hour
Resident $112/4 hours
$28 each additional hour
Non-Residents $134/4 hours
$34 each additional hour
PR24 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 48)
Resident $96/4 hours
$24 each additional hour
Non-Residents $115/4 hours
$29 each additional hour
Resident $96/4 hours
$24 each additional hour
Non-Residents $115/4 hours
$29 each additional hour
PR25 Comercial Uses Picnic - Area (seats 36)
Resident $72/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
Non-Resident $86/4 hours
$22 each additional hour
Resident $72/4 hours
$18 each additional hour
Non-Resident $86/4 hours
$22 each additional hour
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 32 of 34
359
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
PR26 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 24)
Resident $48/4 hours
$12 each additional hour
Non-Resident $58/4 hours
$15 each additional hour
Resident $48/4 hours
$12 each additional hour
Non-Resident $58/4 hours
$15 each additional hour
PR27 Comercial Uses Picnic Area (seats 18) / 4 HoursPer each additional hour New Resident $36/4 hours
$9 each additional hour
Non-Resident $44/4 hours
$11 each additional hour
Emerald Glen Amphitheater Fees
AM1
Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations, Homeowners Associations, and Sports Leagues
Daily Fee $207.50 $216
AM2 Public Agencies, Dublin Chamber or Commerce, Dublin-based Charitable and Social Welfare and Sport League Organizations Daily Fee $470 $490 AM3 Individuals/Other Groups - Resident Daily Fee $625 $651 AM4 Individuals/Other Groups -Non-Resident Daily Fee $750 $782 AM5 Commercial Uses - Resident Daily Fee $832 $867
AM6 Commercial Uses - Non-Resident Daily Fee $1,000 $1,040 Section 10.5: Parks & Recreation Program Fees - Sports Fields Rental Fees** SR1 Public Agencies, Dublin Youth Sports Leagues Sports Fields Rental - Turf Field / Hour $7 $7 SR2 Public Agencies, Dublin Youth Sports Leagues Sports Fields Rental - Synthetic Turf Field / Hour $25 $26 SR3 Public Agencies, Dublin Youth Sports Leagues Sports Fields Rental - Lighting Charge / hour $25.40 $26 SR4 Dublin Adult Sports Leagues, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations
Sports Fields Rental - Turf Field / Hour $16.80 $18
SR5 Dublin Adult Sports Leagues, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations
Sports Fields Rental - Synthetic Turf Field / Hour $50 $52 SR6 Dublin Adult Sports Leagues, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations
Sports Fields Rental - Lighting Charge / hour $27.20 $28 SR7 Individual or Other Groups Sports Fields Rental - Turf Field / Hour Resident $21 Non-Resident $25.20
Resident $22
Non-Resident $26
SR8 Individual or Other Groups Sports Fields Rental - Synthetic Turf Field / Hour Resident $62.50 Non-Resident $104.70
Resident $65
Non-Resident $78
SR9 Individual or Other Groups Sports Fields Rental - Lighting Charge / hour Resident $34/hour Non-Resident $40.80/hour
Resident $35
Non-Resident $43
SR10 Commercial Uses Sports Fields Rental - Turf Field / Hour Resident $33.60 Non-Resident $40.30
Resident $35
Non-Resident $42
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 33 of 34
360
Exhibit A
# Item / Service Description / Unit Fees through
6/30/22
Fee Effective
7/1/22
SR11 Commercial Uses Sports Fields Rental - Synthetic Turf Field / Hour Resident $100 Non-Resident $250
Resident $104
Non-Resident $125
SR12 Commercial Uses Sports Fields Rental - Lighting Charge / hour Resident $54.40 Non-Resident $65.30
Resident $57
Non-Resident $68
Tennis Court Rentals
TR1 Public Agencies, Dublin Youth Sports Leagues Per Court Per Hour $5 $5 TR2 Dublin Adult Sports Leagues, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin- based Charitable and Social Welfare Organizations Per Court Per Hour $5 $7 TR3 Individuals or Other Groups Per Court Per Hour Resident $10 Non-Resident $12
Resident $10
Non-Resident $12
TR4 Commercial Uses Per Court Per Hour Dublin-based Business $15 Non Dublin-based Business $18
Dublin-based Business $16
Non Dublin-based Business $19
Cricket Batting Cages Facility Rentals
CR1 Public Agencies, Dublin Sports Organizations, Non-profit Organizations Per Hour Per Cage $15 $16 CR2 Residents Per Hour Per Cage $18 Resident $19
Non-Resident $23
CR3 Non-residents, Commercial Uses Per Hour Per Cage $22 $23 For Tournaments, an hourly Facility Attendant fee in addition to the rental fees will be charged. Please refer to the Sports Fields Use Policy for more information.
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 34 of 34
361
Fees Prior to RoundingCITY OF DUBLIN MASTER FEE SCHEDULE- PRIOR TO ROUNDING Adjusted by CPI change, Dec 2020 - Dec 2021 (+5.52%)
# I
tem / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 1.0: General & Administrative
130 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Fee Per kilowatt Hour fee (kWh) to help recover the cost of electricity to the City $0.30 30 cents per kWh while plugged in
to City-owned EV charging stations $0.32 32 cents per kWh while plugged in to City-owned EV charging stations
Section 1.1: Finance / Business License
162 Annual Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(A)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Annual Business License / per business $27.15 $27.00 $28.65 $28.00
164 New Business Registration (License) Registration fee $96.67 $96.00 $102.00 $102. 00 165 Itinerant Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(B)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Daily to a maximum of 5 days / per day $40.19 $40.00/day - Max.
$200 per year $42.41 $40.00/day - Max.
$200 per year
166 Temporary Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.250(C)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Temporary places of sale / daily $46.70 $46.00/day $49.28 $46.00/ day 167 Master Business Registration (License) Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

4.04.250(D)
(Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Master license for organizer / per permitted event $40.19 $40.00 $42.41 $42.00
168 Business License Transfer Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.280 (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Transfer is substantially similar to the ownership existing before the transfer / per transfer $64.08 $64.00 $67.62 $67.00 169 Duplicate Business License Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.290 (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Replace any license previously issued license $23.90 $23.00 $25.21 $25.00
170 Delinquent Business License Processing Fee 22.00* 22.00* 171 Contract Retention Escrow Fee Contractors may elect to have retention amounts paid to a third party escrow / per payment
$66.26 $66.00 $69.91 $69.00
Section 1.2: Administrative Fees - Impact Fee Credit Agreement Administration 408 Impact Fee Credit Statement Per statement - Developers who request statements for credit balance $124.91 $124.00 $131.80 $131. 00 409 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Park Land/Affordable Unit Impact Fee Credit
Flat fee $310.64 $310.00 $327.79 $327.00
410 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Traffic Impact or Park Improvement Impact Fee Credit
Flat fee $310.64 $310.00 $327.79 $327.00
411 Original/Transfer agreement to establish a Fire Impact Fee Credit Flat fee $310.64 $310.00 $327.79 $327. 00 412 Impact Fee Credit Application Processing Fee Per invoice $141.20 $141.00 $148.99 $148.00 413 Impact Fee Credit Invoice Change Fee Flat fee $175.96 $175.00 $185.67 $185.00 Section 2.0: Police Services- General (Fingerprints / Records / Vehicles/ Development) 201 Livescan (Fingerprints) Fingerprinting / per application - Outside Agency /DOJ Fees charged separately
$31.50 $31.00 $33.24 $33.00
202 Fingerprint Card Card / non-electronic prints - Outside Agency/DOJ Fees charged separately $47.79 $47.00 $50.43 $50. 00 205 Records subpoena: photos saved to CD Duplication of photo records / per CD $72.77 $72.00 $76.79 $76.00 206 Visa Letter Preparation of a Visa letter requested for foreign travel / per letter $70.60 $70.00 $74.50 $74. 00 208 Fix-It Ticket Sign-Off Sign-off on ticket not issued by Dublin Police Services / per citation $44.53 $10.00 $46.99 $10. 00 210 Towed / Stored Vehicle Release Provide release documentation for towed and/or stored vehicle / per vehicle
$116.22 $100.00 $122.63 $100.00
Section 2.1: Police Services- Permits
220 Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) – One Day Permit Issuance of documents required for an application to ABC / per application (Police Chief may waive for Dublin-based non-profit)
$85.81 $85.00 $90.54 $90.00
221 Bingo Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.44) Annual license issuance per the Municipal Code / per application $123.82 $123.00 $130.66 $130. 00 Per Senate Bill 234, the City cannot impose a business license fee for small or large family daycare *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 1
Attachment 3
362
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
222 Dance Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.52) Processing of a dance permit per the municipal code / per permit $123.82 $123.00 $130.66 $130.00 223 Fortune Teller Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.08) Processing of a fortune teller permit per the municipal code / per permit $123.82 $123.00 $130.66 $130.00 224 Gun Dealer Permit Processing of a Gun Dealer permit / per permit $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00 225 Massage Establishment – Initial (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.20) Processing of a massage establishment permit per the municipal code / per location $420.34 $420.00 $443.54 $443.00
226 Massage Establishment – Yearly (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.20) Annual permit after initial massage establishment permit / per permit $268.28 $268.00 $283.09 $283.00 228 Parade Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.12) Processing of a parade permit per the municipal code / per event (permit only - service charges per 5.12.100 additional) $230.26 $230.00 $242.97 $242.00 229 Peddler Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.16) Processing of a peddler permit per the municipal code / per application $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00 230 Secondhand Dealer Permit (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.12) Processing of a secondhand dealer permit per the municipal code / per permit $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00
231 Taxi Company (Owner) Permit - Initial (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

6.76)
Processing of a taxi company (owner) permit per the municipal code / per initial permit $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00
232 Taxi Company (Owner) Permit – Renewal (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 6.76) Annual permit after initial Taxi Company (owner) permit / per permit $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00 233 Taxi Driver (Operator) Annual Permit – (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter

6.76) Annual permit Taxi Driver (operator) permit / per permit $247.64 $247.00 $261.31 $261.00 234 Tobacco Retailer License (Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.40) Annual license issuance per the Municipal Code / per license $311.72 $311.00 $328.93 $328.00 Section 2.2: Police Services- Hourly Rates
PS1 Sheriffs Technician Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $99.93 $99.00 $105.44 $105.00 PS2 Sheriff’s Deputy Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $199.85 $199.00 $210.88 $210.00 PS3 Sheriffs Sergeant Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $230.26 $230.00 $242.97 $242.00 Section 4.1: Fire Prevention Services Plan Review & Inspection Plan Review & Inspection
240 New Construction up to 5000 sq. ft. Per application $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 241 New Construction 5000 sq. ft. to 45,000 sq. ft. Per application $1,307.72 $1,307.00 $1,379.91 $1,379.00 242 New Construction >45,000 sq. ft. Per application $1,707.43 $1,707.00 $1,801.68 $1,801.00 243 Tenant Improvement up to 5000 sq. ft. Per application $407.31 $407.00 $429.79 $429.00 244 Tenant Improvement 5000 sq. ft. to 45,000 sq. ft. Per application $507.23 $507.00 $535.23 $535.00 245 Tenant Improvement >45,000 sq. ft. Per application $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 246 Custom Single-Family Residence *** Per application $307.38 $307.00 $324.35 $324.00 247 Processing, Review, Inspection & Approval of Licensed Care Facilities New Fee $369.29 $369.00 $389.68 $389.00 248 Review and Approval of Improvement plans and/or maps New Fee $249.81 $249.00 $263.60 $263.00 Fire Alarm Systems – (New or Tenant Improvements)
250 Fire Alarm System < 50 devices Per application $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 251 Fire Alarm System > 50 devices Per application $1,107.87 $1,107.00 $1,169.03 $1,169.00 252 High-rise System Per building $1,807.35 $1,807.00 $1,907.12 $1,907.00 Fixed Fire Protection Systems
260 Medical Gas System Per system $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 261 Hood Duct System Per system $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 262 Halon or Clean Agent Per system $707.08 $707.00 $746.11 $746.00 263 Spray Booth per booth Per system $507.23 $507.00 $535.23 $535.00 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, Commercial– (New or Tenant Improvements) 270 System < 20 heads Base fee per system $507.23 $507.00 $535.23 $535.00 271 System > 20 heads Base fee per system $1,007.95 $1,007.00 $1,063.59 $1,063.00 272 Plus amount per head in excess of 100 heads Per head $6.52 $6.00 $6.88 $6.00 The fees for all plan review and inspection, fire alarm systems, fixed fire systems, and automatic fire sprinkler systems include one inspection and one re- inspection for each inspection type (e.g. weld, hydro, rough, pre-pour, functional, final, etc.). If a permit applicant elects to split inspections into small pieces such as by floor or by system; additional inspection fees will be due based upon the hourly rate. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 2
363
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
273 Underground Water Supply Per system / tap $1,007.95 $1,007.00 $1,063.59 $1,063.00 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems, Residential– (New and Alterations) 275 NFPA 13 D master plan check and inspection Per system $807.01 $807.00 $851.56 $851.00 276 Additional permits for already approved master plan Per application $607.16 $607.00 $640.67 $640.00 277 NFPA 13R system (per unit, per building) Per unit up to 50 units. $807.01 $807.00 $851.56 $851.00 278 NFPA 13 System Per unit up to 50 units /Per System $1,107.87 $1,107.00 $1,169.03 $1,169.00 279 Underground Water Supply Per system / tap $1,107.87 $1,107.00 $1,169.03 $1,169.00 Section 4.2: Fire Prevention Services Regulated Activities 300 Annual Permits - Group 1 Aerosol, Open Flames & Candles, Fire Hydrants and Valves, Open Burning, Open Flames and Torches $105.36 $105.00 $111.17 $111.00 301 Annual Permits - Group 2
Carbon Dioxide Systems, Cellulose Nitrate Film, Combustible Fiber Storage, Compressed Gases, Cryogenics, Dry Cleaning Plants, Combustible Dust Producing Operations, Floor Finishing, Fruit & Crop Ripening, Fumigation, Repair Garages, HPM Facilities, Hot Work Operations, LP Gas, Liquid or Gas Fueled Equipment in assembly buildings, Lumberyards, Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities, Rooftop Heliports, Wood Products, Magnesium, Misc.

Combustible Storage, Organic Coatings, Industrial Ovens, Cutting and Welding, Storage of Scrap Tires
$159.66 $159.00 $168.48 $168.00
302 Annual Permits - Group 3 Temporary Membrane Structures and Tents >400 sq. ft. $213.97 $213.00 $225.78 $225.00 303 Annual Permits - Group 4
Aviation Facilities, Amusement Buildings, Carnivals & Fairs, Exhibits & Trade Shows, Explosives, Flammable or Combustible Liquids, Hazardous Materials, High Piled Storage, Places of Assembly, Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material, Pyroxylin Plastics, Refrigeration Equipment, Spraying & Dipping Operations, Production Facilities, Live Audiences
$268.28 $268.00 $283.09 $283.00
304 Annual Permits - Group 5 Tire Rebuilding Plants $377.98 $377.00 $398.84 $398.00 305 Annual Permits - Group 6 Waste Handling $486.59 $486.00 $513.46 $513.00 306 Annual Permits - Group 7 Covered and Open Mall Buildings $704.91 $704.00 $743.82 $743.00 Annual Notice of Inspection (Self Inspection)
344 Annual notice of inspection (Waived if business is subject to Annual Regulated Activity Permit)
Collected as supplement to the Annual Business Registration imposed under Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.04.250 / per year $38.02 $38.00 $40.11 $40.00 Section 4.3: Fire Works Displays & Sales
Fire Works Displays
350 Display Aerial Base Fee Per event $325.84 $325.00 $343.83 $343.00 351 Additional amount per shell group 60 shells If applicable added to base fee $140.11 $140.00 $147.85 $147.00 352 Additional amount per shell group 61-120 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.81 $249.00 $263.60 $263.00 353 Additional amount per shell group 121-181 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.81 $249.00 $263.60 $263.00 354 Additional amount per shell group 181-240 shells If applicable added to base fee $249.81 $249.00 $263.60 $263.00 355 Additional amount per shell group > 241 shells If applicable added to base fee $358.43 $358.00 $378.21 $378.00 Fire Works Sales
356 Fireworks Stand Application Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.24.070(B) (Info Only - Established by City Ord/Code) Processing and administration of fireworks stands $144.46 $144.00 $152.43 $152.00
357 Fireworks Stand Inspection Cost to inspect sales locations $199.85 $199.00 $210.88 $210.00 Section 4.4: Fire Prevention Services- Hourly Rates
FR1 Deputy Fire Marshall Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $199.85 $199.00 $210.88 $210.00 FR2 Fire Code Compliance Officer Hourly rate for special services not otherwise defined / per hour $109.70 $109.00 $115.76 $115.00 *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 3
364
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 5.1: Housing Services Program Fees
501 Below Market Ownership Units - Transaction Fee Administration of the “For Sale” Inclusionary units / per unit per change in ownership – Including Initial $2,769.68 $2,769.00 $2,922.57 $2,922.00 502 Secondary Below Market Rate Unit - Transaction Fee Administration of the “Second Units” designated to meet Affordable Program requirements / per unit per change in ownership – including Initial $1,547.76 $1,547.00 $1,633.20 $1,633.00 504 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 20 units or less Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $1,293.60 $1,293.00 $1,365.01 $1,365.00 505 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 21 to 100 units Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $2,102.79 $2,102.00 $2,218.86 $2,218.00 506 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring Fee - 101 + units Rental developments with Inclusionary units / per development with restricted rent $3,028.18 $3,028.00 $3,195.34 $3,195.00 507 Annual Below Market Rate Rental Monitoring - Follow Up Compliance Fee First follow up (base fee); additional follow up audits T&M $462.70 First Follow up $462.00 Additional - T&M $488.24 First Follow up $488.00
Additional - T&M
508 Below Market Rate Unit - Refinance Administrative Fee Administrative cost for document preparation and research when an inclusionary unit requires City approval / per request $1,032.93 $1,032.00 $1,089.95 $1,089.00 509 Secondary Below Market Rate Unit - Refinance Administrative Fee Administrative cost for document preparation and research when a secondary inclusionary unit requires City approval / per request $583.26 $583.00 $615.46 $615.00 510 First time home loan program - administrative fee Administrative charge for review and approval of first time home buyer loan / per loan approved $1,955.07 $1,955.00 $2,062.99 $2,062.00 Section 6.1: Planning Division
Use Permits (TUP/CUP)
550 Minor Use Permit Per application $1,086.15 $1,086.00 $1,146.10 $1,146.00 551 Minor Use Permit – Minor Amendment Per application $271.54 $271.00 $286.53 $286.00 552 Minor Use Permit – Major Amendment Per application $1,086.15 $1,086.00 $1,146.10 $1,146.00 553 Non-Residential Conditional Use Permit (CUP) / (Approval considered by Planning Commission) Per application $1,629.22 $1,629.00 $1,719.16 $1,719.00 554 Non-Residential Conditional Use Permit (CUP) / (Can be approved by Zoning Administrator) Per application $1,629.22 $1,629.00 $1,719.16 $1,719.00 555 Residential Conditional Use Permit (CUP) / (Approval considered by Planning Commission) Per application $2,715.37 $2,715.00 $2,865.26 $2,865.00 556 Residential Conditional Use Permit (CUP) / (Can be approved by Zoning Administrator) Per application $2,715.37 $2,715.00 $2,865.26 $2,865.00 559 Conditional Use Permit – Minor Amendment (Administrative Determination) Per request $543.07 $543.00 $573.05 $573.00 560 Conditional Use Permit – Time Extension (Administrative Determination) Per request $380.15 $380.00 $401.14 $401.00 561 Conditional Use Permit – Time Extension (Planning Commission Determination) Per request $1,629.22 $1,629.00 $1,719.16 $1,719.00 562 Temporary Use Permit - Minor Per application $271.54 $271.00 $286.53 $286.00 Zoning Clearance-General
571 Banner / Balloon/Searchlight Per sign / balloon $108.61 $108.00 $114.61 $114.00 572 Indoor recreational Facilities/Day Care Center/Scarlett Court Per application $543.07 $543.00 $573.05 $573.00 574 Zoning Clearance-General Per application $81.46 $81.00 $85.96 $85.00 Site Development Review (SDR)
592 Site Development Review – Single Sign (Master Sign Program is handled as a Site Development Review-General) Per Sign $353.00 $352.00 $372.48 $372.00 593 Site Development Review Waiver Per request $380.15 $380.00 $401.14 $401.00 595 Site Development Review – Time Extension (Administrative Determination) Per request $244.38 $244.00 $257.87 $257.00 596 Site Development Review – Time Extension (Planning Commission Determination) Per request $1,221.92 $1,221.00 $1,289.37 $1,289.00

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROCESSING
601 Planned Development Minor Amendment –(Administrative Determination) Per application $556.11 $556.00 $586.81 $586.00 For all activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost shall be determined using composite City Staff rates and designated overhead factors. Overhead shall also be applicable to any work contracted by the City. An initial deposit shall be made by the applicant as determined by City Staff based on the scope and complexity of the project. Additional deposits shall be collected as necessary during processing. Any applicant funds remaining after completion of the project shall be refunded to the applicant.
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 4
365
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 6.2: Other Planning Fees
Other Charges
611 Appeal of Action by member of public (non-applicant) Per appeal $217.23 $217.00 $229.22 $229.00 612 Estoppel Certificate – Development Agreement Per certificate prepared when requested by entity not a party to the Development Agreement $253.07 $253.00 $267.04 $267.00
613 Heritage Tree Removal Permit Per tree $271.54 $271.00 $286.53 $286.00 614 Preparation of Mailing Address Labels (Noticing Requirements) Per set of labels $70.60 $70.00 $74.50 $74.00 621 Building division permit referral *** Per application $147.72 $147.00 $155.87 $155.00 Section 6.3: Planning Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead PL1 Composite City Planning Staff Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per Hour for T&M activities $299.78 $299.00 $316.32 $316.00 Section 7.1: Building and Safety Division – Building Permits (Total Valuation) Building Permits Based on Valuation Formula / $ Valuation *** 700 $0-$500 Per calculated valuation $93.41 $50.00 $98.57 $50.00 701 $501-$1,000 Per calculated valuation $109.70 $109.00 $115.76 $115.00 702 $1,001-$2,000 Per calculated valuation $168.35 $168.00 $177.65 $177.00 703 $2,001-$3,000 Per calculated valuation $230.26 $230.00 $242.97 $242.00 704 $3,001-$4,000 Per calculated valuation $261.76 $261.00 $276.21 $276.00 705 $4,001-$5,000 Per calculated valuation $318.24 $318.00 $335.81 $335.00 706 $5,001-$10,000 (first $5000) Per calculated valuation $318.24 $318.00 $335.81 $335.00 707 $5,001-$10,000 (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $55.39 $55.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $58.45 $58.00
708 $10,001-$50,000 (first $10,000) Per calculated valuation $593.00 $593.00 $593.00 $610.00 709 $10,001-$50,000(each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $30.41 $30.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $32.09 $32.00
710 $50,001-$100,000 (first $50,000) Per calculated valuation $1,793.00 $1,793.00 $1,793.00 $1,890.00 711 $50,001-$100,001 (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $29.33 $29.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $30.94 $30.00
712 $100,001-$500,000 (first $100,000) Per calculated valuation $3,243.00 $3,243.00 $3,243.00 $3,390.00 713 $100,001-$500,000 (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $23.90 $23.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $25.21 $25.00
714 $500,001 and up (first $500,000) Per calculated valuation $12,443.00 $12,443.00 $12,443.00 $13,390.00 715 $500,001 and up (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $13.03 $13.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $13.75 $13.00
Fees 708, 710, 712, 714, 722 are calculated using cost per $1000 of the preceding Fee. *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver.

Building Permits which are not established as fixed fee shall be determined using the total valuation. In this case the fee due is based on: Occupancy and Construction Type; estimated cost of services and the Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, Cal Green and Energy codes as adopted by the Calculation of the Building Permit fee to be collected shall be in accordance with the Table below. The determination of the valuation and annual adjustments to the valuation shall be made by the Building Official as authorized in Dublin Municipal Code section 7.28.430(E). *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 5
366
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 7.2: Building and Safety Division – Master Plan Check / Green Building Building Permits Based on Valuation Formula /$ Valuation Single Family detached tract housing (when using a Master Plan Check) 720 $100,001-$500,000 (first $100,000) Per calculated valuation $2,525.30 $2,525.00 $2,664.69 $2,664.00 721 $100,001-$500,001 (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $11.95 $11.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $12.61 $12.00
722 $500,001 and up (first $500,000) Per calculated valuation $6,925.00 $6,925.00 $6,925.00 $7,464.00 723 $500,001 and up (each additional $1000) Per calculated valuation $4.34 $4.00 for ea. $1,000 or fraction thereof $4.58 $4.00 for ea. $1,000
or fraction thereof
Section 7.3: Building and Safety Division – Residential Flat Fees Residential Building Permits - Flat Fees
730 Bathroom Remodel or Repair Per bathroom $406.22 $406.00 $428.64 $428.00 731 Electrical Appliances Per Appliance - Installation of electrical appliances per “Service Explanation” #1 $112.96 $112.00 $119.19 $119.00
732 Electrical Circuits (first) First or single circuit per “Service Explanation” #2 $112.96 $112.00 $119.19 $119.00 733 Electrical Circuits (each additional) Fee for each additional circuit per “Service Explanation” #2 $19.55 $19.00 $20.63 $20.00 734 Electrical Panels (first) First or single panel per “Service Explanation” #3 $167.27 $167.00 $176.50 $176.00 735 Electrical Panels (each additional) Fee for each additional panel per “Service Explanation” #3 $52.14 $52.00 $55.01 $55.00 736 Fireplace Insert Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #4 and #5 $211.80 $211.00 $223.49 $223.00 737 Garbage Disposal Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #1 $92.32 $92.00 $97.42 $97.00 738 Gas Piping System Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #6 $207.45 $207.00 $218.91 $218.00 739 Hot Tub / Spa Portable Per single installation “Service Explanation” #7 $207.45 $207.00 $218.91 $218.00 740 HVAC System Per system / “Service Explanation” #8 $220.49 $220.00 $232.66 $232.00 741 Kitchen Remodel or Repair (w/o structural modifications) Per permit, limited to one kitchen $685.36 $685.00 $723.19 $723.00 742 Lawn Sprinkler System Per system for any lawn sprinkler or irrigation system $105.36 $105.00 $111.17 $111.00 743 Motors Per “Service Explanation” #9 $220.49 $220.00 $232.66 $232.00 744 Plumbing Fixture Per “Service Explanation” #1 and #2 $101.01 $101.00 $106.59 $106.00 745 Roofing Replacement (Residential) For re-roofing a single family dwelling $234.61 $234.00 $247.56 $247.00 746 Shower / tub replacement only Per unit $167.27 $167.00 $176.50 $176.00 750 Solar Pool Heating System Per system (when not included with original pool permit) $323.67 $323.00 $341.54 $341.00 751 Solar Water Heaters Per application $275.88 $275.00 $291.11 $291.00 752 Ventilation Fan Per “Service Explanation” #10 $87.98 $87.00 $92.83 $92.00 753 Water Heater Per “Service Explanation” #8 $101.01 $101.00 $106.59 $106.00 754 Water Piping System Per single installation / per “Service Explanation” #6 $207.45 $207.00 $218.91 $218.00 755 Window Replacements (first 5 windows) Per application containing 1-5 windows $200.94 $200.00 $212.03 $212.00 756 Window Replacements (each additional window) Additional per window charge added to base 1-5 window charge on same application $10.86 $10.00 $11.46 $11.00

SERVICE EXPLANATIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL FLAT FEES
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 The provisions for residential flat fees may be applied when the specific work involved is for a single dwelling unit and /or appurtenant accessory structures where there is no other work except the item listed herein. “Service Explanations” follow the Table.

For installation, relocation or replacement of temporary power poles, power pedestals, subpanels or service upgrades (includes all necessary circuits, For the installation, relocation or replacement of each vent or factory-built chimney.

For installation, alteration or replacement of an electrical circuit (includes all necessary outlets, switches, receptacles, and lighting fixtures). *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 6
367
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
8 9
10 Section 7.4: Building and Safety Division – Non-Residential Flat Fees Non-Residential Building Permits - Flat Fees
766 Replacement in - kind Heating and or Air conditioning units Per unit - “Service Explanation” #8 $675.58 $675.00 $712.88 $712.00 767 Water heaters - standard Per water heater - "Service Explanation" #8 $167.27 $167.00 $176.50 $176.00 768 Reroof Base (Initial square) Per initial square (10ft X 10ft) area $130.34 $130.00 $137.53 $137.00 769 Reroof – Additional beyond base Each additional square (10ft x 10ft) area or fraction thereof $13.03 $13.00 $13.75 $13.00 Section 7.5: Building and Safety Division – Construction Debris & Demolition 771 Residential per C&D phase/bond required Per Phase $414.91 $414.00 $437.81 $437.00 772 Residential non-bonded project **** Per application $229.18 $229.00 $241.83 $241.00 774 Commercial - bonded Per application $414.91 $414.00 $437.81 $437.00 775 Commercial - non-bond Per application $229.18 $229.00 $241.83 $241.00 Section 7.6: Building & Safety- Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead BS1 Composite City Building & Safety Staff Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $231.35 $231.00 $244.12 $244.00 Section 7.7: Building and Safety Division – Other Fees
781 Certified Accessibility Specialist (CASp)- Meeting Initial meeting and review; all other work is T&M $1,384.84 $1,384.00 $1,461.28 $1,461.00 782 Code compliance survey Initial 100 sq. ft. $685.36 $685.00 $723.19 $723.00 783 Code compliance survey Each additional 100 sq. ft. or fraction thereof $24.98 $24.00 $26.36 $26.00 786 Plan storage fee Applies to plans required to be prepared by a professional engineer or architect $10.86 $10.00 $11.46 $11.00
787 Re-inspection fee. Per each re-inspection; on Multi-Family, fee is calculated per unit $192.25 $192.00 $202.86 $202.00 789 Service requested outside of regular working hours / business days (4 hour min) Per hour with a four hour minimum $261.76 $261.00 $276.21 $276.00 791 Address Requests (single address) *** Per Request $122.73 $122.00 $129.51 $129.00 793 Issue permit refund Per refund $72.77 $72.00 $76.79 $76.00 794 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Per Application $187.90 $187.00 $198.28 $198.00 For installation, relocation or replacement of any motor (not an integral part of an integral part of an electrical appliance, fan, heating appliance, cooling appliance), generator, heater, electrical furnace, welding machine, transformer, and rectified (includes all necessary circuits, outlets, fixtures, For all activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost shall be determined using composite City Staff rates and designated overhead factors. Overhead shall also be applicable to any work contracted by the City. An initial deposit shall be made by the applicant as determined by City Staff based on the scope and complexity of the project. Additional deposits shall be collected as necessary during processing. Any applicant funds remaining after completion of the project shall be refunded to the applicant.
*** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver.

For the installation, relocation or replacement of each heating, cooling or refrigeration appliance (includes all necessary electrical circuits, outlets, fixtures, switches, receptacles, gas piping vents, water piping and duct work). OR (a) For the installation, relocation or replacement of each gas fired water heater (includes all necessary water and gas piping and vents). OR (b) For the installation relocation or replacement of each electrical water For installation, relocation or replacement of ventilation fans connected to a single duct or outlets, switches, receptacles, fixtures and duct work). *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 7
368
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 8.1: Engineering / Public Works – Other Fees
800 Copies - 24" x 36" Per Sheet $5.00* $5.00*
802 Research Fee Per 1/2 Hour $158.58 $158.00 $167.33 $167.00 807 Permit processing fee Includes cost of processing grading or encroachment permit or misc. permit $141.20 $141.00 $148.99 $148.00 808 Trenching / Road Cuts – Base transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, 1 - 100 sq. ft. Base Permit cost up to 100 sq. ft. $506.15 $506.00 $534.08 $534.00 809 Trenching / Road Cuts – Over 100 SF transverse and longitudinal trenches, road cuts, >100 sq. ft. Additional permit cost per additional square foot in excess of 100 sq. ft. $2.17 $2.00 $2.29 $2.00 810 Construction concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter 1- 50 sq. ft Base Permit cost up to 50 sq. ft. $633.23 $633.00 $668.18 $668.00 811 Construction concrete sidewalk, curb, and gutter greater than 50 sq. ft Additional permit cost per additional linear foot in excess of 50 sq. ft. $2.17 $2.00 $2.29 $2.00 812 Constructing concrete driveways: residential Per Driveway- Residential $759.22 $759.00 $801.13 $801.00 813 Constructing concrete driveways: commercial Per Driveway - Commercial $1,265.36 $1,265.00 $1,335.21 $1,335.00 814 Constructing drain inlets, manholes, and connections to same Connection of inlet $1,012.29 $1,012.00 $1,068.17 $1,068.00 815 Encroachment Permit Resurfacing Surcharge – 100 sq. ft. or less Per each permit where roadway asphalt is cut impacting 100 sq. ft. or less of roadway $108.61 $108.00 $114.61 $114.00
820 Filming/Photography Within Public Right of Way - Professional Fee Per Application $748.36 $748.00 $789.67 $789.00 822 Building division permit referral – residential *** Per application $616.93 $616.00 $650.99 $650.00 823 Building division permit referral - non residential Per Application $926.49 $926.00 $977.63 $977.00 826 ADA site compliance review Per application $926.49 $926.00 $977.63 $977.00 827 Newsrack Permit Per application / single space in City-owned newsrack $380.15 $380.00 $401.14 $401.00 830 Amended map or certificate of correction Fixed Fee $627.79 $627.00 $662.45 $662.00 833 Investigation fee/work without a permit (encroachment) Hourly Rate - 1 hr. minimum. Over 1 hour (Time & Materials) $253.07 $253.00 -Base Over 1 Hour - (T&M) $267.04 $267.00 - 834 Traffic control plan review (encroachment) Fixed Fee $371.46 $371.00 $391.97 $391.00 836 Warranty inspection and project closeout (subdivision) Fixed Fee $926.49 $926.00 $977.63 $977.00 837 Condition of approval compliance review or single parcel review (no improvement plans) Hourly Rate - 1 hr. minimum. Over 1 hour (Time & Materials) $317.16 $317.00 -Base Over 1 Hour - (T&M) $334.66 $334.00 - *** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver.

For all activities noted as Time and Materials (T&M), the cost shall be determined using composite City Staff rates and designated overhead factors. Overhead shall also be applicable to any work contracted by the City. An initial deposit shall be made by the applicant as determined by City Staff based on the scope and complexity of the project. Additional deposits shall be collected as necessary during processing. Any applicant funds remaining after completion of the project shall be refunded to the applicant.
*** In order to incentivize accessory dwelling units (ADUs): 1) an ADU less than 750 square feet; and 2) ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed- restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years are not subject to these City permit fees, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code, the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU, and/or enforcement fees are not eligible for this fee waiver. **** Waived for ADUs less than 750 square feet and ADUs 750 square feet or larger that are deed-restricted as lower-income units for a period of 55 years, if a homeowner/contractor agrees to use AVI for handling construction and demolition debris, rather than self-haulers, effective for building permits applied for between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2026. ADUs required to satisfy Chapter 8.68 (Inclusionary Zoning Regulations) of the Dublin Municipal Code and the scope of work beyond the establishment of the ADU are not eligible for this fee waiver. *Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 8
369
# Item / Service Description / Unit FY 2021-22
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/21
FY 2022-23
Fees Prior to rounding down
Fee Effective
7/1/22
Section 8.2(A): Conditions: -Cash Bond Required For Encroachment Permit Section 8.3: Engineering- Composite Hourly Rates & Overhead EN1 Composite City Engineering Staff (Excludes Inspectors) Hourly Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $317.16 $317.00 $334.66 $334.00 EN2 Composite City Public Works / Engineering Inspectors Rate (Includes Overhead) Per hour for T&M activities $253.07 $253.00 $267.04 $267.00 Section 8.4: Environmental Programs- Fees
870 Building division permit referral Flat Fee $493.11 $493.00 $520.33 $520.00 871 Stormwater Treatment Measure Inspection Per Hour $253.07 $253.00 $267.04 $267.00 872 Storm Drain Medallion Each Medallion $10.86 $10.00 $11.46 $11.00 873 Stormwater Facility Inspections: Restaurant/Commercial Flat Fee $414.91 $414.00 $437.81 $437.00 874 Trash Capture/Enclosure Inspection Flat Fee $210.71 $210.00 $222.34 $222.00 875 Review of Annual Maintenance Reports of privately maintained post- construction Flat Fee $234.61 $234.00 $247.56 $247.00
876 Initial Annual Self Haul Permit Annual Permit $611.88 $611.00 $645.65 $645.00 877 Annual Self Haul Permit Renewal Annual Permit $365.70 $365.00 $385.88 $385.00 Section 8.5: Environmental Programs- Composite Hourly Rates ENV1 Environmental Coordinator Per Hour $213.97 $213.00 $225.78 $225.00 ENV2 Environmental Technician Per Hour $183.56 $183.00 $193.69 $193.00 ENV3 Office Assistant II Per Hour $127.08 $127.00 $134.09 $134.00 - Conditions For Release: Bonds shall be released six months after the work has been accepted by the City, provided there are no defects in the work. - Annual Bonds: A minimum annual cash deposit of $5,000.00 may be posted in lieu of a cash or a surety bond for each permit. The City may require additional bonds or cash deposits
*Local Fees and Charges not subject to annual adjustment based on Consumer Price Index (CPI)
**Fees and Charges established by separate ordinance, State Law, or another agency and not subject to CPI adjustment Page 9
370

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 4.14
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Authorizing Remote Meetings of City Council and City Commissions Due to Increase in COVID-19 Cases
Prepared by: John Bakker, City Attorney
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

From March 2020 through September 2021, the City conducted meetings of its legislative bodies remotely pursuant to various executive orders that suspended certain Brown Act provisions. In October, the City returned to in-person meetings and at the same time state law changed to require certain findings to be made for an agency to meet remotely. Under the new law, AB 361, the City can conduct virtual meetings where the Governor has proclaimed a State of Emergency and state or local health officials have imposed or recommended social distancing or where the City Council has declared the need to meet remotely due to imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees. On January 11, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution pursuant to AB 361 authorizing remote teleconferenced meetings for a 30-day period ending February 10, 2022. Due to the current increase in cases resulting from the Omicron variants, it would be prudent for the City Council and City Commissions to have the ability to attend meetings virtually for at least the next 30 days. The City Council will consider adopting a resolution that would allow for virtual attendance for the next 30 days.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Finding That There is a Proclaimed State of Emergency; Finding That Meeting in Person Would Present Imminent Risks to the Health or Safety of Attendees as a Result of the State of Emergency; and Authorizing Remote Teleconferenced Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Dublin Pursuant to AB 361.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None.
371

Page 2 of 3 ends

DESCRIPTION:

On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the State address the broader spread of COVID-19.

On March 18, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying the proclamation of a local state of emergency by the Director of Emergency Services due to COVID-19.

On March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20, which suspended certain provisions of the Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means. Additionally, the State implemented a shelter-in-place order, requiring all non-essential personnel to work from home.

At that time and through September 2021, the City’s legislative bodies met by teleconference. On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which among other things, rescinded certain clauses of Executive Order N-29-20 after September 30, 2021, including clauses that suspended certain provisions of the Brown Act. Thus, effective October 1, 2021, agencies would have had to transition back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act.

The City of Dublin began meeting in person beginning in October 2021.

Since the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, the highly contagious Delta variant has emerged, causing a spike in cases throughout the state and within the Alameda County.

Additionally, since then, the Omicron variants have emerged and been designed as a variant of concern by the United States, and the number of cases in the City have increased over the last month.

On September 16, 2021, the Governor signed AB 361 (2021) which allows for local legislative and advisory bodies to continue to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions and includes a requirement that the Council make specified findings. AB 361 took effect immediately.

AB 361 allows local legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely after the expiration of the clauses of Executive Order N-29-20. Under AB 361, the City and its legislative bodies may meet remotely when:
· The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency; · State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing;
· Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

On January 11, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution authorizing remote teleconferenced meetings for a period of 30 days pursuant to AB 361. That resolution expired on February 10, 2022.
372

Page 3 of 3 ends

At its April 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council directed Staff to bring a resolution to the May 3, 2022 meeting to allow the City Council and the City’s legislative bodies to meet virtually, including hybrid meetings, pursuant to AB 361. At its May 3, May 17, and June 7, 2022 meetings, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 39-22, 48-22, and 65-22 that included the necessary findings pursuant to AB 361 to allow the City Council and the City’s legislative bodies to meet remotely or in a hybrid format for 30 days.

The City meets the requirements to hold meetings remotely in order to ensure the health and safety of the public:
· The Governor has declared a State of Emergency, and the City Council has ratified the proclamation of a local emergency by the Director of Emergency Services; · The CDC recommends social distancing of at least six feet due to COVID-19; · There’s been an increase of COVID-19 cases within the state and throughout Alameda County;
· Meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, the legislative bodies, and staff.

The proposed resolution includes the necessary findings pursuant to AB 361 to allow the City Council and the City’s legislative bodies to meet remotely or in a hybrid format for the next 30 days. The City Council would need to adopt a subsequent resolution declaring the need to continue to meet remotely to allow for such meetings after that 30-day period.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Finding That There is a Proclaimed State of Emergency; Finding That Meeting in Person Would Present Imminent Risks to the Health or Safety of Attendees as a Result of the State of Emergency; and Authorizing Remote Teleconferenced Meetings of the Legislative Bodies of the City of Dublin Pursuant to AB 361
373
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. xx-22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
FINDING THAT THERE IS A PROCLAIMED STATE OF EMERGENCY; FINDING THAT MEETING

IN PERSON WOULD PRESENT IMMINENT RISKS TO THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF ATTENDEES AS A RESULT OF THE STATE OF EMERGENCY; AND AUTHORIZING REMOTE

TELECONFERENCED MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN PURSUANT TO AB 361
WHEREAS, all meetings of the City of Dublin’s legislative bodies are open and public, as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act (Cal. Gov. Code sections 54950 – 54963), so that any member of the public may attend, participate, and watch the City’s legislative bodies conduct their business; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the State prepare for a broader spread of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”); and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying the proclamation of a local emergency by the Director of Emergency Services due to COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 suspending certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act in order to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means; and WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 and its successors, the City Council met primarily virtually through September 2021; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which, effective September 30, 2021, ended the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 that allows local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Governor Newsom signed AB 361 (2021) which allows for local legislative bodies and advisory bodies to conduct meetings via teleconferencing under specified conditions and includes a requirement that the City Council make specified findings. AB 361 (2021) took effect immediately; and
WHEREAS, under AB 361 (2021), an agency meeting virtually requires that the Governor declare a State of Emergency pursuant to Government Code section 8625; and WHEREAS, AB 361 (2021) further requires that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing, or, requires that the legislative body determines that meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health and safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City, specifically, Governor Newsom has 374
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 2 of 3 declared a State of Emergency due to COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, since the issuance of Executive Order N-08-21, the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19 has emerged, causing an increase in COVID-19 cases throughout the State and Alameda County; and
WHEREAS, on November 30, 2021, the Omicron variant was designated as a variant of concern by the United States; and
WHEREAS, cases of the highly contagious Omicron variant, including a subvariant called BA.2, have caused surges of COVID-19 and there has been an increase in cases during the last month in Alameda County; and
WHEREAS, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) continues to recommend physical distancing of at least 6 feet from others outside of the household; and WHEREAS, because of the recent rise in COVID-19 cases due in part to the highly contagious Omicron variants of COVID-19, the City is concerned about the health and safety of all individuals who intend to attend City Council and meetings of the City’s other legislative bodies; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the imminent risks of the City’s legislative bodies holding in person meetings to the health or safety of attendees exists due in part to the Omicron variants of COVID-19; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, acting as a legislative body pursuant to Government Code section 54952(a) and for the benefit of all legislative bodies created by the City Council pursuant to Government Code section 54952(b), that the presence of COVID-19 and the Delta and Omicron variants would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, staff, and members; and WHEREAS, teleconference meetings may include hybrid meetings, in which all or some members of the legislative body meet in person while others attend by teleconference, and members of the public are either allowed to participate only by teleconference or both in person and by teleconference (“hybrid meetings”). The purpose of hybrid meetings is to allow for multiple modes of attending meetings while reducing the risks of COVID-19, including the Delta and Omicron variants; and
WHEREAS, the City shall ensure that its meetings comply with the provisions required by AB 361 (2021) for holding teleconferenced meetings.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Dublin as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct, and incorporated into this Resolution.

2. In compliance with AB 361 (2021), and in order to continue to conduct teleconference meetings without complying with the usual teleconference meeting requirements of the Brown Act, the City Council makes the following findings:
a) The City Council has considered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and b) The state of emergency, as declared by the Governor and City Council, and as specifically related to the current increase in cases apparently resulting from the 375
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 3 of 3 Omicron variant, directly impacts the ability of the City Council and the City’s legislative bodies, as well as staff and members of the public, to meet safely in person; and c) The CDC continues to recommend physical distancing of at least six feet due to COVID-19 and as a result of the presence of COVID-19 and the increase of cases due to the Omicron variant, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees, the legislative bodies and staff.

3. City staff is directed to facilitate any teleconference meetings, including hybrid meetings, of the City Council and City’s legislative bodies in compliance with AB 361, in order to better ensure the health and safety of the public for a period of thirty days following the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
376

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 4.15
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Dublin Senior Living Project (PLPA-2021-00042) Prepared by: Gaspare Annibale, Associate Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On June 7, 2022, the City Council held a Public Hearing to consider the Dublin Senior Living Project consisting of a two-story, 155,517-square-foot building with 152 units, including 114 assisted living units, 38 memory care units and a total of 174 beds. The City Council waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance approving the Planned Development Zoning and adopted a Resolution approving the Site Development Review Permit. The City Council will hold a second reading of the Ordinance approving the Planned Development Zoning.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Waive the reading and adopt the Ordinance Considering the CEQA Addendum, Amending the Zoning Map and Approving a Planned Development Zoning District with a Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin Senior Living Project.

DESCRIPTION:

South Bay Partners, LLC. is proposing a community care facility on a vacant 5.74-acre site located at 5751 Arnold Road. The project site is located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. Refer to Figure 1 for the project location and Table 1 for surrounding land uses. The property has a General Plan land use designation of Campus Office and is currently developed with a parking lot, landscaping and a graded pad for what was to be a future office building. The property is subject to Planned Development Zoning (Ordinance No. 30-98), which was approved as part of the Creekside Office Park Project in 1998.
377

Page 2 of 3 ends

Figure 1. Project Location
The Applicant proposes to construct the Dublin Senior Living Project, consisting of a two-story, 155,517-square-foot building with 152 units, including 114 assisted living units, 38 memory care units and a total of 174-beds, and related site improvements. Requested approvals include a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and a Site Development Review Permit.

On June 7, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing, waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance amending the zoning map and approving a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan. The City Council also adopted a Resolution approving the Site Development Review Permit.

The City Council is being asked to hold a second reading and adopt the Ordinance, included as Attachment 1. For a complete description of the project, please refer to the Staff Report for the June 7, 2022 City Council meeting, which is included as Attachment 2.

Project
Location
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
NORTH
378

Page 3 of 3 ends

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Development of the project site was previously addressed in the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report for which the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report and an addendum on August 22, 1994. Pursuant to Resolution No. 53-93, the City Council adopted a Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program, which continues to apply to development in Eastern Dublin. The City Council also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in connection with certification of the 1993 GPA/SP EIR.

Consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including Section 21166 and related CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, the City prepared an Initial Study to determine whether additional environmental review was required for the proposed Dublin Senior Living project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City determined that no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required for the proposed project and an Addendum to the 1993 GPA/SP EIR is the appropriate CEQA review, as there were no new potentially significant impacts associated with the project. The City further determined that the 1993 GPA/SP EIR adequately addressed the potential environmental impacts of the Dublin Senior Living Project as there are no significant project changes, new information, or change in circumstances that result in a new or substantial increase in severity of a significant impact from those identified in the 1993 GPA/SP EIR. Therefore, no standards for requiring supplemental environmental review or documentation under CEQA are met and none are required for the project. Since completion of the CEQA Addendum, minor revisions have been made to address the number of trees to be removed, preserved and planted as part of project implementation. No other revisions were made or required. As these revisions are editorial in nature, they do not affect the outcome of the environmental analysis conducted or increase related impacts that were evaluated in the CEQA Addendum.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Considering the CEQA Addendum, Amending the Zoning Map and Approving a Planned Development Zoning District with a Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin Senior Living Project
2) City Council June 7, 2022 Staff Report, without attachments 379
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 22

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

CONSIDERING THE CEQA ADDENDUM, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT WITH A RELATED STAGE 1 AND STAGE 2

DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DUBLIN SENIOR LIVING PROJECT
PLPA 2021-00042
(APN 986-0014-013-00)
The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The Applicant, South Bay Partners, LLC., proposes to develop a community care facility located at 5751 Arnold Road. The proposed project consists of a two-story, 155,517-square-foot building with 152 units, including 114 assisted living units, 38 memory care units and a total of 174 beds.

Common space amenity areas, and associated site, frontage and landscape improvements are also proposed. Requested approvals include a Planned Development Rezoning with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and Site Development Review Permit. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Senior Living Project” or the “Project”.

B. The Project site is approximately 5.74 acres located on the east side of Arnold Road, north of Central Parkway (APN 986-0014-013-00).

C. The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Campus Office and is located in a Planned Development Zoning District (Ordinance No. 30-98).

D. The community care facility is consistent with the Campus Office land use designation but requires amendments to the Planned Development Zoning District.

E. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared.

F. The Project site is located in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area, for which the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report and an addendum on August 22, 1994 (1993 GPA/SP EIR), which identified impacts from development of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area. The City Council adopted mitigation measures, a mitigation monitoring program and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53-93, incorporated herein by reference).

G. The City prepared an Initial Study to determine whether supplemental environmental review was required for the proposed Project under CEQA standards. The Initial Study examined whether there were substantial changes to the proposed development, substantial changes in circumstances, or new information, any of which would result in new or more severe significant impacts than previously 380
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 2 of 8 analyzed in the 1993 GPA/SP EIR, or whether any standards for supplemental environmental review were met.

H. Upon completion of the Initial Study, it was determined that there were no new potentially significant impacts associated with the Project and, therefore, an Addendum to the 1993 GPA/SP EIR was prepared.

I. Following a properly noticed public hearing on May 10, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-07 recommending that the City Council consider the CEQA Addendum, and approve of a Zoning Map Amendment, a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 and 2 Development Plan and a Site Development Review Permit for the Dublin Senior Living Project, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available at City Hall during normal business hours.

J. A Staff Report, dated June 7, 2022, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the CEQA Addendum, Zoning Map Amendment, Planned Development Rezoning and Site Development Review Permit for the City Council.

K. On June 7, 2022, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the Zoning Map Amendment, Planned Development Rezoning and Site Development Review Permit at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard.

L. The City Council considered the Addendum to the 1993 GPA/SP EIR, as well as the prior 1993 GPA/SP EIR and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony before taking any action on the Project.

M. The City Council did hear and use independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth.

Section 2: Findings
A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code (DMC), the City Council finds as follows.

1. The Dublin Senior Living Project (“the Project”) PD-Planned Development Zoning meets the purpose and intent of DMC Chapter 8.32 in that it provides a comprehensive development plan that creates a desirable use of land that is sensitive to surrounding land uses by virtue of the layout and design of the site plan. The Project is planned comprehensively and will follow development standards tailored to the specific needs of the site. These standards will address issues such as building setbacks, architecture, landscaping and grading. The proposed facility will blend with the natural features unique to the site through the use of design and planning.

The Applicant proposes internal common space areas and landscape amenity areas around the building, which are consistent with the provisions and regulations for development set forth therein.

2. Development of the Project under the PD-Planned Development Zoning will be harmonious and compatible with existing and future development in the surrounding area in that the site will provide for a new community care facility, which as a commercial service use type will be similar 381
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 3 of 8 to other nearby uses, which include a mix of commercial, office, residential (single-family and multifamily), institutional, and civic uses.

B. Pursuant to DMC Sections 8.120.050 A and B, the City Council finds as follows.

1. The PD-Planned Development Zoning for the Project will be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in the surrounding area in that the proposed site plan has taken into account adjacent land uses and will provide a wide range of amenities for residents of the facility. The Project will allow for elderly residents of surrounding neighborhoods to continue to reside in Dublin and will provide employment opportunities. The proposed site plan has considered a land use type and density that is compatible with the adjacent area and densities.

2. The Project site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the zoning district being proposed in that the site is flat with access provided from Arnold Road and is served by existing public utilities. The Project site conditions are documented in the Addendum to the 1993 GPA/SP EIR and prior certified 1993 GPA/SP EIR, and the Project will implement all adopted mitigation measures, as applicable. There are no site conditions that have been identified that will present an impediment to development of the site for the proposed community care facility.

3. The PD-Planned Development Zoning will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare in that the Project will comply with all applicable development regulations and standards and will implement all adopted mitigation measures, as applicable. In order to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access to all portions of the site, access is provided to the site from Arnold Road.

4. The PD-Planned Development Zoning is consistent with and in conformance with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, in that the proposed use as a community care facility is consistent with the existing Campus Office land use designation for the site, which allows commercial service uses. The Project complies with this designation as it will provide for an attractive, campus-like setting for a non-retail commercial use that will not generate nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors, or glare.

Section 3: Zoning Map Amendment
Pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.32, the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to rezone the property described below to a Planned Development Zoning District, and supersedes and replaces the previously adopted zoning (Resolution No. 30-98):

5.74 acres located on the east side of Arnold Road, north of Central Parkway (Assessor Parcel Number 986-0014-013-00) (“the Property”).
382
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 4 of 8 A map of the rezoning area is shown below:

Section 4. Approval of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the following Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the 5.74-acre project area, which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with DMC Section 8.32.080 or its successors.

Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan
This is a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan pursuant to DMC Chapter 8.32. This Development Plan meets all the requirements for both a Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and is adopted as part of the PD-Planned Development Zoning for the Dublin Senior Living Project (PLPA-2021-00042).

The Planned Development zoni ng district and this Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan provides flexibility to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the General Plan and provisions of DMC Chapter 8.32 are satisfied.

1. Statement of Proposed Uses
Permitted Uses (as defined by the Zoning Ordinance):

Community Care Facility/Large
Similar and related uses as determined by the Director of Community Development Conditional Uses:

None
Accessory Uses:

Uses which are necessarily and customarily associated with, and are appropriate, incidental, and subordinate to the principal uses as determined by the Director of Community Development 383
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 5 of 8

2. Stage 1 and Stage 2 Site Plan
The Stage 1 and Stage 2 Site Plan is shown below.

3. Site Area, Proposed Densities and Development Regulations Maximum Beds 174
Maximum Faculty and
Staff
42 (on-site at one time)
Floor Area Ratio 0.62
Maximum Building
Height:
2 stories/28 feet
Maximum lot coverage 32%
Parking Spaces 1 per 3 employees on largest shift, plus 1 per 3 beds
Parking Stall Dimensions
Standards
Per Chapter 8.76 Off-Street Parking and Loading
Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance
Minimum Setbacks 20’ front (along Arnold Road)
10’ side (along north and south property lines)
10’ rear (along east property line)
Signage Pursuant to Chapter 8.84 Sign Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance
384
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 6 of 8

4. Phasing Plan.

The Project is not subject to a phasing plan as it will be built in one phase, first beginning with site preparation, and followed by grading, building construction, paving and architectural coating.

5. General Plan and Specific Plan Consistency.

The Project is consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designation of Campus Office, which allows commercial service uses, such as community care facilities. in addition, the proposed use will provide for an attractive, campus-like setting for a non- retail commercial use that will not generate nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors, or glare and is consistent with the floor area ratio of 0.25. to 0.80 allowed in the Campus Office land use designation.

6. Inclusionary Zoning Regulations.

The proposed project is a commercial use type and is not subject to the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations (DMC Chapter 8.68) for the provision of affordable housing because the regulations apply only to residential development projects of 20 units or more.

7. Architectural Standards.

The Project’s architectural style utilizes a contemporary design approach, which has been designed to be complementary to the nearby residential development within the Dublin Crossing Specific Plan.

The architectural design of the Project shall reflect the following standards:
 Incorporate features such as different wall planes, heights, wall textures, low slope/flat roof construction, light fixtures, and landscaping to enhance the building detail at the pedestrian level.
 Use high quality modern materials including engineered wood-look panel veneer, smooth stucco finish, cultured stone veneer, and provide for stucco clad framed elements to break down the building form into more human scale volumes.
 Colors shall be neutral in nature, while bright/harsh primary colors shall be avoided.  Windows shall provide for a modern style and vary in size and configuration, while being free of decorative mullions.
 Where appropriate, given the orientation of the building to the sun, modern metal canopies shall be provided above windows to employ shade to respective units.  Provide functional outdoor spaces for residents, which allows for gathering and socializing, with landscaping, outdoor seating, enhanced paving treatment, and other features to provide an appropriate urban scale for the development.

8. Preliminary Landscaping Plan.

The conceptual landscape design of the Project shall reflect the following standards:
 Create a park-like environment that is utilized by the residents.  Provide plentiful green space and natural habitat that utilizes a native and climate-adaptive planting palette to Dublin, and is considered moderate or low water use. 385
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 7 of 8  Provide a generous landscape buffer along Arnold Road that softens the main street frontage.
 Preserve existing trees where possible along the site perimeter to further enhance the landscape buffer and better integrate the new development into the surrounding community.  Utilize plants that provide a year -round vegetated landscape with seasonality, color, and interest for an attractive visual environment.

9. Aerial Photo.

10.Applicable Requirements of Dublin Zoning Ordinance.

Except as specifically provided in this Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the property shall be subject to the regulations of the closest comparable zoning district as determined by the Community Development Director and the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. No development shall occur on this property until a Site Development Review Permit has been approved.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be enforced thirty (30) days following its final adoption.

Section 6. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public spaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

Project
Location

COMMERCIA
L

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
386
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 8 of 8 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk
387

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 8 ends

Agenda Item 6.1
DATE: June 7, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Dublin Senior Living Project (PLPA-2021-00042) Prepared by: Gaspare Annibale, Associate Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Applicant, South Bay Partners, LLC., proposes to develop a community care facility located at 5751 Arnold Road. The proposed project consists of a two-story, 155,517-square-foot building with 152 units, including 114 assisted living units, 38 memory care units and a total of 174 beds.

Common space amenity areas and associated site, frontage, and landscape improvements are also proposed. Requested approvals include a Planned Development Rezone with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and a Site Development Review Permit. The City Council will consider the Dublin Senior Living project, including an Addendum to the General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and: 1) waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Considering the CEQA Addendum, Amending the Zoning Map and Approving a Planned Development Zoning District with a Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin Senior Living Project; and 2) adopt the Resolution Approving a Site Development Review Permit for the Dublin Senior Living project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The cost associated with processing the proposed project is borne by the Applicant.

DESCRIPTION:

South Bay Partners, LLC. is proposing a community care facility on a vacant 5.74-acre site located within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) area. Refer to Figure 1 for the project location and Table 1 for surrounding land uses. The property has a General Plan and EDSP land use designation of Campus Office and is currently developed with a parking lot, landscaping, and a Attachment 2
388

Page 2 of 8 ends

graded pad for what was to be a future office building. The property is subject to a Planned Development (PD) zoning district (Ordinance No. 30-98), which was approved as part of the Creekside Office Park Project in 1998.

Figure 1. Project Location
Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses
Location Zoning General Plan Land Use Current Use of the Property North PD (Planned Development) Campus Office Creekside Business Park South PD (Planned Development) Campus Office Hites Plaza East PD (Planned Development) Campus Office Ross Stores Offices West DCZD (Dublin Crossing
Zoning District)
Dublin Crossing Boulevard (Dublin
Crossing)
Project
Location
SOUTH
WEST
EAST
NORTH
389

Page 3 of 8 ends

Background
On January 7, 1994, the City Council adopted a General Plan Amendment and the EDSP, which provides a comprehensive land use program for the planning area of roughly 3,300 acres, along with goals and policies to guide future public and private actions relating to the area’s development.

On March 17, 1998, the City Council adopted a PD Rezone (Ordinance No. 30-98) for the Creekside Office Park Project, which includes the project site located at 5751 Arnold Road. The PD zoning district established general provisions, development regulations and design guidelines for a larger

31.2-acre area that includes Hites Plaza. The PD, as written, encourages a site layout and building design that creates the appearance of a singular workplace, rather than independent developments, to accommodate a mix of office, and research and development uses. Hites Plaza includes two development pads envisioned to accommodate a mix of office and research and development uses. One of those sites was constructed and fully occupied but the second site has remained undeveloped.

Proposed Project
The Applicant proposes to construct an assisted living and memory care facility on the undeveloped site. The proposed use is defined by the Zoning Ordinance as a “Community Care Facility, Large,” which is considered a commercial use type. The proposed project is a two-story, approximately 155,517-square-foot community care facility. A total of 152 units are proposed, including 114 assisted living units, 38 memory care units and a total of 174 beds. In addition to the assisted living and memory care units, the first and second floor of the facility would provide a range of amenities and support facilities for residents and staff. These amenities include two courtyards, one for assisted living residents and the other for memory care residents, a kitchen, lobby area, offices, medical facilities, living areas, theatre, activity areas and dining rooms.

Associated site, frontage, and landscape improvements are also proposed. Refer to Figure 2 for the proposed site plan. Requested approvals include a PD Rezone with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and a Site Development Review (SDR) Permit. 390

Page 4 of 8 ends

Figure 2. Proposed Site Plan
Analysis
Planned Development Rezone
The project site has an existing PD zoning district (Ordinance No. 30-98), which allows business, administrative and professional office uses. To accommodate the proposed project, the application includes a PD Rezone. The proposed PD establishes a detailed Development Plan for the site, including permitted and conditionally permitted uses, the overall development density and intensity (e.g., floor area ratio, building heights, setbacks, etc.) and design guidelines. A “Community Care Facility, Large” as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, would be the only use allowed by the PD. Table 2 provides an overview of the proposed development standards for the proposed project.

Table 2. Development Standards
Maximum Beds 174
Maximum Faculty and
Staff
42 (on site at one time)
Floor Area Ratio 0.62
Maximum Building Height: 2 stories/ 28 feet
Maximum lot coverage 32%
Parking Spaces 1 per 3 employees on largest shift, plus 1 per 3 beds
Parking Stall Dimensions
Standards
Per Chapter 8.76 Off-Street Parking and Loading
Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance
Minimum Setbacks 20’ front (along Arnold Road)
10’ side (along north and south property lines)
Arnold Road
391

Page 5 of 8 ends

10’ rear (along east property line)
Signage Pursuant to Chapter 8.84 Sign Regulations of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance
The draft Ordinance providing the details of the proposed zoning district is included as Attachment 1.

Site Development Review Permit
The following is a summary of the key components of the project associated with the SDR Permit.

The draft Resolution approving the SDR Permit is included as Attachment 2 with the project plans included as Attachment 3.

Site Design and Access: The project site is accessed from a new single driveway off Arnold Road that leads directly to the building’s front entrance and parking area located to the north of the building. This driveway aligns with the signalized intersection at Arnold Road and Horizon Parkway. The site is also accessed from adjacent properties through joint access easements that provide access to Central Parkway and Hacienda Drive. Adjacent to the building’s front entry is a large, covered canopy, which allows for resident and guest pick-up and drop-off. Further east is a loading and receiving area, trash enclosure, and generator enclosure.

As part of the project, a new sidewalk will be installed along the project driveway from Arnold Road to the building entrance. In addition, new curb ramps will be installed at the intersection of Arnold Road and the new driveway. Refer to Sheet A1.0 in the project plans for the site plan.

Architecture: The project’s architectural style utilizes a contemporary design approach that uses varying planes, materials, and colors to break up the mass and complement the architecture of the mix of surrounding residential and commercial uses. The two-story building is accented with changes in exterior cladding and colors, modern style windows that vary in size, awnings, and a multiple-level, flat roof. The main entry is highlighted through a large canopy providing cover for vehicle pick-up and drop-off. The building is finished with a variety of materials including engineered wood-look panel veneer, smooth stucco, and cultured stone veneer. The proposed paint colors are neutral in nature with white, grey, and taupe colors used on the varying wall planes as well as the brown wood panels, and tan color used to accentuate the canopy and front entrance of the building. The color and materials are shown in the project plans on Sheets A4.0– A4.4.

Landscaping: Landscaping will be provided throughout the parking lot, around the perimeter of the building, and around the perimeter of the site to provide a visual buffer and screening to surrounding uses. This includes a landscape buffer along Arnold Road that would help to soften the project frontage. Various evergreen and ornamental trees, shrubs, grasses, perennials, ground cover, and vines are provided. There are 118 existing trees on the project site, of which 86 trees are proposed to be removed within the existing parking lot to accommodate the building, and 32 trees would be preserved, including existing mature trees along Arnold Road. Two of the trees proposed for removal are dead, and none are considered heritage trees. A total of 87 trees would be planted as part of the proposed project.
392

Page 6 of 8 ends

The proposed project provides approximately 17,644 square feet of private open space, including 6,187 square feet for the memory care courtyard and 11,457 square feet for the assisted living courtyard. Landscaping would be provided within the memory care and assisted living courtyards, which would incorporate illuminated walkways, a seating area and activity space for residents.

The proposed landscape plan is shown in the project plans on Sheet L100. An arborist report evaluating the on-site trees in included as Attachment 4.

Public Art: The Applicant intends to satisfy the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance through the payment of in lieu fees. Condition of Approval No. 16 in the Resolution approving the SDR Permit captures this requirement.

CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE:

The proposed community care facility and its respective site improvements are consistent with the General Plan and EDSP land use designation of Campus Office, which allows commercial service uses, such as the proposed facility. In addition, the proposed use will provide for an attractive, campus-like setting for a non-retail commercial use that will not generate nuisances related to emissions, noise, odors, or glare. The proposed floor area ratio of 0.62 is consistent with the floor area ratio of the Campus Office land use designation of 0.25 to 0.80. The proposed use and improvements are also consistent with the proposed Planned Development zoning district.

REVIEW BY APPLICABLE DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES:

The Building and Safety Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Department, and Dublin San Ramon Services District reviewed the project and provided conditions of approval, where appropriate, to ensure that the project is established in compliance with all local ordinances and regulations. Conditions of approval from these departments and agencies have been included in the draft Resolution approving the Site Development Review Permit for the project (Attachment 2).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Development of the project site was previously addressed in the General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (1993 GPA/SP EIR) for which the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report and an Addendum on August 22, 1994.

Pursuant to Resolution No. 53-93, the City Council adopted a Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program, which continues to apply to development in Eastern Dublin. The City Council also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations in connection with certification of the 1993 GPA/SP EIR.

Consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) including Section 21166 and related CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, the City prepared an 393

Page 7 of 8 ends

Initial Study to determine whether additional environmental review was required for the proposed Dublin Senior Living project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City determined that no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required for the proposed project and an Addendum to the 1993 GPA/SP EIR is the appropriate CEQA review, as there were no new potentially significant impacts associated with the project (refer to Attachment 5). The City further determined that the 1993 GPA/SP EIR adequately addressed the potential environmental impacts of the Dublin Senior Living project as there are no significant project changes, new information, or change in circumstances that result in a new or substantial increase in severity of a significant impact from those identified in the 1993 GPA/SP EIR. Therefore, no standards for requiring supplemental environmental review or documentation under CEQA are met and none are required for the project. Since completion of the CEQA Addendum, minor revisions have been made to address the number of trees to be removed, preserved and planted as part of project implementation. No other revisions were made or required. As these revisions are editorial in nature, they do not affect the outcome of the environmental analysis conducted or increase related impacts that were evaluated in the CEQA Addendum. Refer to Attachment 6, Errata Memorandum on the CEQA Addendum. In addition, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is provided as Attachment 7.

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:

On May 10, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed project.

One member of the public addressed the Commission regarding the project. After closing the public hearing and deliberating, the Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the Dublin Senior Living Project and adopted Resolution No. 22-07 (refer to Attachment 8). The dissenting Commissioners expressed concerns about compatibility with the surrounding uses. The concerns primarily focused on the design and materials of the proposed building and compatibility with that of the surrounding commercial buildings, and concern about the loss of a future jobs producing site.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

Two City-led Community Meetings were held on April 20 and 21, 2022, to provide Dublin residents with information about the proposed Dublin Senior Living project. Four community members attended the first meeting, with no community members attending the second meeting.

At the first meeting a clarification question was asked about the type of residential care facility being proposed.

In accordance with State law, a public notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the proposed project to advertise the project and the upcoming public hearing.

A public notice also was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. A Planning Application sign was posted on the project site and the project 394

Page 8 of 8 ends

was also included on the City’s development projects webpage. The City Council Agenda was posted and a copy of this Staff Report has been provided to the Applicant.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Considering the CEQA Addendum, Amending the Zoning Map and Approving a Planned Development Zoning District with a Related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan for the Dublin Senior Living Project
2) Resolution Approving a Site Development Review Permit for the Dublin Senior Living Project 3) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Dublin Senior Living Project Plans 4) Arborist Report
5) CEQA Addendum
6) Errata Memorandum on CEQA Addendum
7) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
8) Planning Commission Resolution No. 22-07 Recommending the City Council Consider an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and Approve an Amendment to the Zoning Map, a Planned Development Zoning District with a related Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan and a Site Development Review Permit for the Dublin Senior Living Project.
395

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 4.16
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Special Designation of General Fund Reserves for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Prepared by: Lisa Hisatomi, Director of Administrative Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In accordance with the City's Fund Balance and Reserves Policy, the City Council will consider special designations of General Fund reserves for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Authorizing a Special Designation of General Fund Reserves for Fiscal Year 2021-22.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Approval of special designations in the General Fund will not result in any change to total fund balance but would shift resources among reserve categories. The Fiscal Year 2021-22 Unassigned (Cash Flow) Reserve is projected at $70,483,123, after Staff’s recommendation of special designations, which is equivalent to nine months of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 General Fund operating budget.

DESCRIPTION:

Background
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 54 (GASB 54), Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Type Definitions, requires fund balance to be classified into different categories for governmental funds depending on the extent to which the use of resources is constrained for specific purposes.

Per GASB 54, the five fund balance classifications are:
 Non-Spendable – amounts that cannot be spent because they are either (a) not in spendable form, or (b) legally or contractually required to be maintained.  Restricted – balance with constraints placed of the use of the resources which are either (a) 396

Page 2 of 3 ends

externally imposed by creditors, contributors, or laws and regulations of other agencies, or (b) imposed by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation.  Committed – amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to formal action of the agency’s governing body. These are considered legally restricted and can only be removed or changed by formal action of the governing body. Action to constrain resources should occur prior to the end of the fiscal year, though the exact amount may be determined subsequently.  Assigned – amounts that are constrained by the governing body’s intent to be used for specific purposes but are neither restricted nor committed.
 Unassigned – used by General Fund for residual classification of positive funds.

Recommended Reserve Designations for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Staff is projecting Fiscal Year 2021-22 with an operating surplus of $16.8 million with an available surplus of approximately $10.0 million, after subtracting budgeted transfers out to CIPs that are funded by Undesignated Reserve, contributions to pension unfunded liability and facilities replacement fund.

The General Fund Reserves Summary (Attachment 2) provides a listing of reserve balances by category. While the Fiscal Year 2021-22 year-end balances are not yet final until the City closes its financial books, Staff can make reasonable assumptions about estimated reserve balances at this point.

Many of the reserve changes are due to the spending down of Committed Reserves for budgeted capital improvement project expenses during Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the spending down of carry-over reserves from the prior year. Other shifts are related to year-end accounting policies.

This Staff Report also transmits a Resolution (Attachment 1) which confirms designations only of Committed Reserves for Fiscal Year 2021-22, as City Council approval of Assigned Reserves is not necessary by resolution. However, Staff seeks City Council direction on each of the following recommended designations:

Committed Reserves:
 Downtown Public Improvement Reserve - Increase $2,200,000 In accordance with the City Council’s Strategic objective #1a: Continue support of the Downtown Preferred Vision and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan including improving visual and environmental quality and evaluating specific business uses, Staff recommends the addition of $2.2 million to this reserve.
 One-Time Initiative - Capital - Increase $1,500,000
In accordance with the City Council’s Strategic objective #4d: Conduct a feasibility study into the fiber connectivity between City facilities. Staff recommends the addition of $1.5 million to this reserve to provide future funding needs for major citywide technological and infrastructure upgrades.
397

Page 3 of 3 ends

 Lease Revenue Bond Payment - Increase $2,000,000
In accordance with the City Council’s Strategic objective #4c: Make annual contributions to reserves for the early payoff of the energy efficiency bonds. Staff recommends the addition of $2.0 million to this reserve.

Assigned Reserves:
 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Revenue Replacement – Create the new reserve and add $665,878
The City Council has allocated $665,878 from the first tranche of American Rescue Plan Act Revenue Replacement category. Per the Treasury Department rule, the use of such funds must go towards current fiscal year City expenditures and may not be directly deposited into a reserve fund. The City could then shift the General Fund savings into an Assigned Reserve for future unexpected pandemic expenditures. The City has utilized the fund to offset General Fund expenditure for polices services contract cost and purchase of computers.  Non-Streets CIP Commitments - Increase $1,000,000
In accordance with the City Council’s Strategic objective #3b: Provide on-going condition assessments of aging city facilities and assets. Staff recommends the addition of $1.0 million to this reserve to fund future capital endeavors on infrastructure maintenance and reinvestment.  Pavement Management - Create the new reserve and add $2,000,000 In accordance with the City Council’s Strategic objective #3c: c. Explore finance options for long-term pavement management needs. Staff recommends the creation of the reserve and add $2.0 million to this reserve to provide funding to optimize the pavement condition within the City.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Special Designation of General Fund Reserves is directly associated with the Two-Year Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2022-23 and 2023-24.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Authorizing a Special Designation of General Fund Reserves for Fiscal Year 2021-22 2) Fiscal Year 2021-22 General Fund Reserves
398
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted 06/21/22 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL DESIGNATION OF GENERAL FUND RESERVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
WHEREAS, the City's Fund Balance and Reserves Policy requires special fund balance allocations to be adopted by the City Council, and allows the City Council to take action prior to the end of the fiscal year to direct a specific assignment of the fund balance; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed updated information regarding fund balance and estimated one-time revenues during the preparation of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby make a special allocation of the estimated Fiscal Year 2021-22 year-end balance to the Committed fund balance as follows:
 Increase the reserve for Downtown Public Improvement Reserve by $2,200,000  Increase the reserve for One-Time Initiative - Capital by $1,500,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, any net resources remaining after special designations, and after meeting the Fund Balance and Reserves Policy requirements, will be left in the Unassigned (Available) Reserve.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
399
Attachment 2FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 GENERAL FUND RESERVES

RESERVE DESCRIPTION
Actual
2020-21
Increase
2021-22
Decrease
2021-22
Net
Change
Projected
2021-22
Non-Spendable $13,266 $13,266
Prepaid Expenses 13,266 13,266
Restricted $4,493,314 $4,493,314
Cemetery Endowment 60,000 60,000
Developer Contr - Downtown 1,490,000 1,490,000
Developer Contr - Heritage Pk 19,000 19,000
Developer Contr - Nature Pk 60,000 60,000
Section 115 Trust - Pension 2,114,314 2,114,314
Heritage Park Maintenance 750,000 750,000
Committed $70,694,542 $5,700,000 ($16,634,077) ($10,934,077) $59,760,465 Advance to Public Facility Fee 9,857,639 (7,074,270) (7,074,270) 2,783,369 Downtown Public Improvement 13,000,000 2,200,000 (200,000) 2,000,000 15,000,000 Economic Development 53,319 (53,319) (53,319)
Economic Stability 8,000,000 8,000,000
Emergency Communications 532,113 532,113
Fire Svcs Pension/OPEB 5,671,094 5,671,094
Innovations & New Opport 1,031,719 (137,220) (137,220) 894,498 One-Time Initiative - Capital 4,966,110 1,500,000 (1,476,078) 23,922 4,990,032 One-Time Initiative - Operating 503,860 503,860
Public Safety Reserve 2,600,000 2,600,000
Specific Committed Reserves
Cemetery Expansion (CIP) 1,173,549 (1,173,549) (1,173,549) Contribution to Public Facility Fee 6,000,000 6,000,000 Cultural Arts Center 4,539,197 (4,364,197) (4,364,197) 175,000 Don Biddle Park (CIP) 2,100,000 (2,100,000) (2,100,000) Fallon Sports Park 3 Contingency 3,110,500 3,110,500
Lease Revenue Bond Payment 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 6,000,000 Maintenance Facility (CIP) 55,443 (55,443) (55,443)
Utility Undergrounding (CIP) 3,500,000 3,500,000
Assigned $66,743,520 $4,665,878 ($1,810,019) $2,855,859 $69,599,380 Accrued Leave 1,296,514 1,296,514
Catastrophic Loss 17,710,320 17,710,320
CIP Carryovers 2,735,111 2,735,111
Fiscally Responsible Adj 325,000 325,000
Municipal Regional Permit 2,212,931 (418,403) (418,403) 1,794,528 Non-Streets CIP Commitments 2,366,100 1,000,000 (93,600) 906,400 3,272,500 Operating Carryovers 1,882,745 1,882,745
Parks and Streets Contingency 201,270 201,270
Pension & OPEB 16,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 17,000,000 Relocate Parks Dept 500,000 500,000
Service Continuity 3,150,000 3,150,000
Specific Assigned Reserves
ARPA Revenue Replacement (New) 665,878 665,878 665,878 Climate Action Plan 3,000,000 3,000,000
Contribution to ISF 1,500,000 1,500,000
Façade Improvement Grants 374,157 374,157
HVAC Replace. & Civic Ctr Improv. (CIP) 3,337,009 (1,145,652) (1,145,652) 2,191,357 Pavement Management (New) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Public Safety Complex (CIP) 152,363 (152,363) (152,363) Village Pkwy Pavemt Recon 10,000,000 10,000,000
Unassigned $67,819,852 $18,444,095 ($11,264,065) $7,180,030 $74,999,883 Unassigned-Unrealized Gains 4,516,760 4,516,760
Unassigned (Available) 63,303,092 70,483,123
TOTAL RESERVES $209,764,495 $28,809,973 ($29,708,160) ($898,187) $208,866,308 400

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 7 ends

Agenda Item 6.1
DATE: June 21, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Adoption Prepared by: Sai Midididdi, Associate Civil (Traffic) Engineer EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider adopting the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee pursuant to the requirements of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement of the Tri-Valley Transportation Council.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and adopt the Resolution Adopting the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Pursuant to the Requirements of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee is used to finance public facilities and improvements needed to serve the demand generated by new development in the Tri-Valley area jurisdictions. The fee would be charged to new development of all types located in the geographic area covered by the Tri-Valley Transportation Council.

DESCRIPTION:

Background
On October 13, 2013, the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa County, the Cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon, and the Town of Danville entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) in order to establish the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC), as a separate agency. The TVTC jointly coordinates transportation planning efforts within the Tri- Valley area. It also collects and administers the Tri-Valley Transportation Development (TVTD) Fee to facilitate the implementation of transportation improvement projects identified in the TVTC strategic expenditure plan (SEP).
401

Page 2 of 7 ends

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the JEPA, TVTC shall through resolution, based on the findings of a nexus study, recommend regional impact fee amounts for categories of land use entitlements within the Tri-Valley Area for purposes of funding a portion of transportation improvement projects identified in the TVTC SEP. In addition, pursuant to Section 6(c) of the JEPA, if the TVTD Fee is recommended for amendment, each member agency shall consider the adoption (by ordinance or resolution) of the TVTD Fee in the amounts recommended by TVTC. In accordance with Section 7(b) of the JEPA, member agencies are only eligible to receive TVTD Fee allocations if they have adopted the uniform TVTD Fee as recommended by the TVTC.

Discussion
On April 18, 2022, TVTC held a public hearing to consider adoption of the TVTD Fee, adoption of new Strategic Expenditure Plan Prioritization of Projects and Funding Plan, and adoption of the Assembly Bill (AB) 602 Supplemental Analysis. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the TVTC adopted Resolution No. 2022-07 approving a new Transportation Development Fee, adopting the new Strategic Expenditure Plan Prioritization of Projects and Funding Plan, and adopting the Assembly Bill (AB) 602 Supplemental Analysis. Prior to the adoption of TVTC Resolution No. 2022-07, the TVTC adopted a Nexus Study in August 2021. (Attachment 2) Nexus Study Requirements
The California Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §66001) requires jurisdictions to identify certain information and make certain statutory findings when establishing, increasing, or imposing a development impact fee. TVTC made these findings as part of its adoption of the TVTD Fee, and these findings are included in the resolution for City Council consideration.

Specifically, the findings jurisdictions are required to make are as follows:

1. Identify the purpose for collecting development impact fees;

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put, including identifying the facilities to be built if applicable;

3. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed;

4. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed; and

Summary of Nexus Study
There have been significant changes in the funding, planning, and traffic conditions under which the TVTD Fee was originally developed. In addition, many of the original 22 projects identified in the previous SEP have been completed and the TVTC identified 23 new projects (List C of the Nexus Study, Attachment 2) to be considered. Based on these factors, an updated nexus study 402

Page 3 of 7 ends

was prepared to support updates to the TVTD Fee. The 2020 Nexus Study was adopted by the TVTC on August 16, 2021.

Since adopting the Nexus Study in August 2021, Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved by the Governor of California and includes additional requirements for nexus fee studies adopted after January 1, 2022. Although TVTC’s Nexus Fee Study was not required to consider AB 602 given its adoption date, TVTC retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to complete an AB 602 supplemental analysis to (1) understand the future implications of AB 602 and (2) to proactively define the methodologies of future Nexus Fee Study updates such that they will be compliant with AB 602. This AB 602 Supplemental Analysis was adopted by TVTC as part of the April 18, 2022 adoption of the TVTD Fee (Attachment 3).

A summary of the 2020 Nexus Study is as follows:

Forecast Growth
New development within the Tri-Valley Area is forecast to add 33,312 households and 63,947 jobs between 2018 and 2040. This growth will produce an increase of 57,596 average AM/PM peak hour trips.

Project Benefits
Based on forecast projections, the vehicle hours of delay is expected to increase by 60 percent during the AM peak and 88 percent during the PM peak. With the 38 improvement projects, this delay is expected to decrease by 15 percent during the AM peak and 23 percent during the PM peak when compared to the 2040 No-Build Scenario, as shown in the following figure. In addition, these projects will result in other benefits to the Tri-Valley Area including improving roadway safety, improving roadway operations, improving public transit, and increasing bicycle ridership. 403

Page 4 of 7 ends

Figure 1: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) Note: Hours of delay are based on trips with origin or destination in the TVTC region.

Nexus Study – Proposed Updated Fee
The total investment for projects eligible to receive TVTD Fee funding is estimated to be $4.573 billion, where $3.702 billion is unfunded. An additional reduction was applied to account for external “cut-though” trips on roadway congestion projects. Future development within the Tri- Valley Area is not responsible to pay for these cut-through trips since these trips are caused by growth outside of the Tri-Valley Area. This reduces the total unfunded cost to be covered by the maximum TVTD Fee to $2.698 billion. Note that this did not change the overall project costs.

The $2.698 billion of unfunded costs were allocated across future development by land use type based on the proportion of forecast peak-hour trips to determine the Total Fee per Land Use.

Then, the maximum fee schedule was determined by dividing the Total Fee per Land Use by the 2020-2040 Growth as shown in the following table.

Table 1: Maximum Fee by Land Use Category
Land Use Type Growth Maximum Fee
Single-Family Residential 15,857 DU $40,250 per DU
Multi-Family Residential 17,456 DU $23,890 per DU
Retail 5,117,500 SF $77.88 per SF
Office 6,796,800 SF $54.10 per SF
Industrial 9,289,800 SF $31.15 per SF
Other 12,441 trips* $46,844 per trip*
* Average AM/PM trip
The maximum fee schedule shown in Table 1 would generate sufficient revenues to fund the total unfunded cost of all selected projects, however, TVTC was not obligated to apply this fee schedule. 24,718
15,613
39,570
29,376
35,852
25,813
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour
Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD)
2020 2040 No-Build 2040 Build
404

Page 5 of 7 ends

For instance, the past practice of TVTC has been to set rates at approximately one-third of the maximum fee calculated in the 1995 and 2008 Nexus Studies to help foster growth within the Tri- Valley Area, while providing a regional funding source that could be used to match and help compete for Federal and State transportation grants and funding programs.

Summary of Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP)
In January 2015, the TVTC adopted Resolution No. 2015-01 adopting the updated TVTD Fee Schedule as a two-year phase-in plan, with no change during the initial year (FY 2014-15), an increase to 25% of the maximum allowable rate by the fee nexus study in the second year (FY 2015-16) and a final increase to 35% of the maximum allowable rate by the third year (FY 2016- 17). That fee was based on the Fee Nexus Study adopted in 2008.

In January 2017, the TVTC approved the 2008 TVTC Nexus Study Validation Review and adopted the 2017 Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP) Update. At that time, the TVTC elected to maintain the current fee rate (only annual Construction Cost Index (CCI) adjustment). The 2017 SEP Update incorporated and built upon the updated project descriptions, funding programs, and progression of the TVTD Fee over the previous years. Some of the transportation improvement projects on the original list were completed and schedules and funding for others have changed. The JEPA, adopted in 2013, required approval of the SEP by a supermajority of the TVTC – six members. 2022 Strategic Expenditure Plan
The proposed 2022 rate adjustments are presented in the following table. The TVTC adopted a rate adjustment reflecting 15% of the maximum fee rate for the duration of the SEP for all uses except retail and “other” land uses.

Table 2: FY 2022-23 Rate Adjustment
Like the prior SEP, it is proposed that retail continue to have a lower cap to help encourage retail growth, given that local retail has been greatly impacted by the global pandemic.

Retail is proposed to initially be established at 6% and then increase to 7% in funding year 2023-

24. In the “Other” land uses category, which consist of developments that do not fall into the other five land use categories such as theaters, motel/hotels, day care facilities, and gas stations, it is recommended that the rate be set at 12% of the maximum fee rate for the duration of the SEP. 405

Page 6 of 7 ends

It is also proposed that the TVTD Fee rate continue to increase on an annual basis based on the annual CCI adjustment to reflect changes in regional construction costs. Similarly, to how the SEP has been implemented in the past, the CCI adjustment will not be applied for years when there is a prescribed rate increase planned. Essentially this means that the CCI adjustment would not be applied for any use in FY 2022-23 and not to retail in FY 2023-24.

A draft SEP Funding Plan was presented to the TVTC Board at the December 13, 2021 study session. Following the study session, the TVTC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) held two community meetings and received feedback from the community on the draft SEP. Subsequently, revisions were made to the draft plan. The SEP subcommittee recommended TVTC adopt the revised SEP Funding Plan. The recommended SEP Funding Plan proposed funding for 22 projects (16 from List C of the Nexus Study, Attachment 2, and 6 priority projects from previous SEP lists) over a 10-year horizon (Attachment 4).

Public Outreach
As referenced above, to provide the public with information related to the TVTC SEP, the TVTC TAC held two community outreach information sessions. The information sessions were held via teleconferencing (i.e. Zoom). A flyer was created for both sessions and circulated to members of the Bay Area Building Industry Association (BIA), the BIA External Affairs Director, members of the development community, advocacy groups and posted to the TVTC website.

TVTC Member Agencies and Recommended Action
The TVTC unanimously adopted a new Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee, a new Strategic Expenditure Plan Prioritization of Projects and Funding Plan, and adopted the AB 602 Supplemental Analysis.

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the JEPA, if the TVTC recommends new TVTD Fee rates, each member agency shall consider the adoption (by ordinance or resolution) of the TVTD Fee in the amounts recommended by TVTC. Pursuant to Section 7(b) of the JEPA, member agencies are only eligible to receive TVTD Fee allocations in accordance with the TVTC SEP if they have adopted the uniform TVTD Fee as recommended by the TVTC.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

A notice was placed in the East Bay Times on June 10, 2022 and June 16, 2022 notifying the community of the City Council’s consideration of the proposed fee revisions, TVTD Fee updates, and that all the relevant materials are on file with the City Clerk for public review for a 10-day period prior to the City Council’s consideration of the fee update. Additionally, the City Council Agenda was posted.
406

Page 7 of 7 ends

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Adopting the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Pursuant to the Requirements of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
2) Exhibit A to the Resolution – TVTC Resolution No. 2021-10 and 2020 Nexus Study 3) Exhibit B to the Resolution – AB 602 Supplemental Analysis 4) Exhibit C to the Resolution – TVTC Resolution No. 2022-07 and 2022 Strategic Expenditure Plan Prioritization of Projects, and Funding Plan
407
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 1 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 22

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

ADOPTING THE TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEE PURSUANT TO

THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on October 13, 2013, the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa, the Cities of Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, San Ramon, and the Town of Danville entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) in order to establish the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC), as a separate agency, to jointly coordinate transportation planning efforts within the Tri- Valley Area through collecting and administering the Tri-Valley Development Fee (TVTD Fee) to facilitate the implementation of transportation improvement projects identified in the TVTC Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP); and
WHEREAS, the 2013 JEPA replaced the previous JEPA, adopted in 1998, pursuant to which the member agencies previously collected the TVTD Fee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the JEPA, TVTC shall through resolution, based on the findings of a nexus study, recommend regional impact fee amounts for categories of land use entitlements within the Tri-Valley Area for purposes of funding a portion of transportation improvement projects identified in the TVTC SEP; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6(c) of the JEPA, if the TVTD Fee is recommended for amendment, each member agency shall consider the adoption (by ordinance or resolution) of the TVTD Fee in the amounts recommended by TVTC; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7(b) of the JEPA, member agencies are only eligible to receive the TVTD Fee in accordance with the TVTC SEP if they have adopted the uniform TVTD Fee as recommended by the TVTC; and
WHEREAS, there have been significant changes in the funding, planning, and traffic conditions under which the TVTD Fee was originally developed. In addition, many of the original 22 projects identified in the previous SEP have been completed and the TVTC has identified 23 new projects (List C of the Nexus Study) to be considered; and WHEREAS, TVTC entered into a contract with Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”) to complete the 2020 TVTC Nexus Study and Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP) in accordance with the requirements of the California Mitigation Fee Act; and WHEREAS, the 2020 Nexus Study (“Study”) considered the following new projects (“Projects”) and the number of trips generated by the anticipated development of each land use type and determined a Maximum Fee Rate for each of the land uses from Appendix B of the Study. The Projects considered in the Study include the remaining projects from List A and List B, as well as the following new projects:
 C-1 Tesla Road Safety Improvement,
 C-2 Norris Canyon Road Safety Improvement Project,
 C-3 Dublin Boulevard-North Canyons Parkway Extension, 408
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 2 of 5  C-4 Vasco Road at Dalton Avenue Intersection Improvements,  C-5 El Charro Road Widening,
 C-6 Sunol/680 Interchange Improvements,
 C-7 I-680 Express Lanes-Hwy 84 to Alcosta,
 C-8 Santa Rita/I-580 Interchange,
 C-9 Stoneridge/I-680 Interchange,
 C-10 Innovate 680,
 C-11A Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing-City of San Ramon,  C-11B Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing-City of San Ramon,  C-11C Iron Horse Trail Crossing at Dublin Boulevard,
 C-11D Iron Horse Trail,
 C-11E Iron Horse Trail to Shadow Cliffs Connection,
 C-11F Iron Horse Trail Connection Improvements at Santa Rita Road,  C-11G Iron Horse Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing-Town of Danville,  C-11H Iron Horse Trail System-Wide Improvements,
 C-12 I-680 Interchange Improvements at Hacienda Drive,  C-13 Fallon/El Charro Interchange,
 C-14 Valley Link Rail (Phase 1),
 C-15 Technology Enhancements,
 C-16 I-680 Express Bus Service; and
WHEREAS, the TVTC Technical Advisory Committee and Consultant reviewed forecasts of new development in the Tri-Valley Area, and outlined the status, scope, costs, and anticipated funding for the Projects; and
WHEREAS, on August 16, 2021, the TVTC adopted the Tri-Valley Transportation Council 2020 Nexus Study Fee Update attached hereto as Exhibit A, pursuant to TVTC Resolution No. 2021-10; and
WHEREAS, since adopting the 2020 Nexus Study in August 2021, Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved by the Governor of California and includes additional requirements for nexus fee studies adopted after January 1, 2022; and
WHEREAS, while the 2020 Nexus Fee Study was not required to incorporate AB 602 given its adoption date, TVTC retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to complete an AB 602 supplemental analysis to (1) outline the future implications of AB 602 and (2) to proactively define the methodologies of future Nexus Fee Study updates such that they will be compliant with AB 602; and
WHEREAS, the AB 602 Supplemental Analysis, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, was adopted by the TVTC on April 18, 2022; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2022, by TVTC Resolution No. 2022-07, the TVTC adopted and recommended, by a vote of all 7 member agencies, the new TVTD Fee rates shown in the table below, which are effective July 1, 2022 (“2022 TVTD Fee rates”); and FY2022/2023 Rate Adjustment
Land Use Current % of FY 2022/23 Change from % Change
409
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 3 of 5 2021
Rate
Maximum Rates 2021 Rates
Single Family (DU) $5,057 15% $6,596.40 $1,539.40 30.4% Multi-Family (DU) $3,484 15% $3,889.20 $405.20 11.6%
Retail (SF) $3.74 6% $5.07 $1.33 35.6%
Office (SF) $8.59 15% $8.81 $0.22 2.5%
Industrial (SF) $5.00 15% $4.97 -$0.03 -0.6%
Other (avg AM/PM
trips)
$5,620 12% $6,100.68 $480.68 8.6%
DU = Dwelling Units; SF=Square Feet
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code § 66001(a)) requires jurisdictions to make certain statutory findings prior to any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project and TVTC made such findings as part of its adoption of the 2022 TVTD Fee rates; and WHEREAS, the recommended fee rate is 15% of the Maximum Fee Rate for the duration of the SEP for all uses except retail and “other” land uses, which are recommended to be set at 6% and 12% of the Maximum Fee Rates, respectively; and
WHEREAS, Transit-oriented housing development projects satisfying the criteria in Government Code Section 66005.1 may conduct a project-level transportation analysis and a smaller proportion of the applicable fee may be imposed; and WHEREAS, the 2022 TVTD Fee recommended retail rate is $5.07 for FY 2022-23 and increased to $5.92 (7% of the maximum) effective July 1, 2023. All other rates for remaining land uses will be adjusted per Construction Cost Index (CCI) as of July 1st of each year consistent with current practice; and
WHEREAS, the TVTC adopted the SEP and Prioritization of Projects and Funding Plan, which proposes funding for 22 projects (16 projects from New List C and 6 priority list from previous project lists) over the next 10 years, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act, (1) a public hearing notice was published in the newspaper and interested persons were notified 30 days in advance of the April 18, 2022 TVTC meeting of the TVTC’s proposed action on the 2022 TVTD Fee, (2) notices were sent to any individuals requesting notices pertaining to fee increases by the TVTC 14 days in advance of the meeting at which the new 2022 TVTD Fee is proposed for adoption, (3) the 2020 Nexus Study, AB 602 Supplemental Analysis, and the draft SEP Funding Plan were available for public review on the TVTC Board’s website 10 days in advance of the meeting at which the new 2022 TVTD Fee, 2020 Nexus Study, SEP, and AB 602 Supplemental Analysis was proposed for adoption, and (4) a public notice was posted 10 days in advance of the meeting.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Dublin, in accordance with Government Code § 66001(a) and based on the information presented in the 2020 Nexus Study, adopts and approves the 2022 TVTD Fee rates shown in the table above and makes the following findings:

1. Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. Response: TVTC policy, as 410
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 4 of 5 expressed through the TVTC Action Plan, is that new development shall contribute for the mitigation of their impacts on Routes of Regional Significance and that the cost-sharing of recommended improvements will be implemented through the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee regional impact fee program. The fee advances a legitimate public interest by enabling the TVTC to fund improvements to transportation infrastructure required to accommodate and mitigate the impacts of new development. This finding is documented by the analysis of the projected increase in future travel generated by the new development that is projected to occur in the Tri-Valley. Growth in new residents and employees is projected to increase the cumulative average daily delay on the Tri-Valley regional roadways in the morning and evening peak hours, excluding effects from more cut-through traffic.

2. Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. Response: The TVTD Fee will be used to fund projects to expand capacity, traffic signal coordination, and other traffic improvements, improve safety, improve regional transit, improve active transportation/bicycle options, and mitigate the impacts of additional congestion on Routes of Regional Significance to serve new development as designated in the Strategic Expenditure Plan. The projects/public facilities to be funded by the fee are identified in the 2020 Nexus Study and the SEP and the Prioritization of Projects and Funding Plan.

3. Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project upon which the fee is imposed. Response: Based on the analysis in the 2020 Nexus Study, the new development projects within the Tri-Valley will generate additional trips which will impact the transportation system in the region, including on Routes of Regional Significance. As illustrated in the 2020 Nexus Study, the planned projects will expand and improve capacity on the Routes of Regional Significance and alleviate congestion to accommodate the increased trips generated by new development. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee for these projects and the new development generating these additional trips on which the fee will be imposed.

4. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. Response: The need for the planned projects is based on the forecasted increase in congestion on Routes of Regional Significance, as well as other transportation impacts resulting from new development.

The 2020 Nexus Study analyzed the contribution by each land use based on the proportion of average AM/PM trips generated by each land use. As demonstrated in the Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the planned projects and the types of development upon which the fee is imposed because the planned projects will mitigate the transportation impacts generated by new development.

5. Determine that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. Response: The 2020 Nexus Study demonstrates that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the proposed fee and the cost or portion of the cost of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed because each land use category’s share of the total trips generated was multiplied by the applicable project costs and then divided by the total number of units, square feet or trips that will occur within the development horizon. In this way, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost attributable to each land use type because the fee applicable to each land use type is based on the number of trips generated by that applicable land use type.

Furthermore, the 2022 TVTD Fee is proposed to be set at between 6% to 15% of the justified 411
Reso. No. XX-22, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2022 Page 5 of 5 maximum fee rate and thus, the amount of the fee is lower than the actual costs attributable to new development.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City of Dublin will:

1. Require each project developer to pay the TVTD Fee prior to issuance of building permits for the project, or no later than occupancy, and to the extent permitted by law.

2. Levy the TVTD Fee on all development projects not exempt from payment of the fee.

3. Apply the TVTD Fee on all significant changes to existing development agreements adopted after the effective date of the JEPA. The TVTD Fee shall be applied to all components of a project that are subject to an amended or renewed development agreement. As used herein, “significant” means any of the following: (a) change in land use type (e.g., office to retail); (b) intensification of land use types (e.g., increases in square footage of approved Office); (c) extension of the term of development agreements; and (d) reduction or removal of project mitigation requirements or conditions of approval.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Dublin finds that the foregoing recitals are true.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
412
Attachment 2
Exhibit A to Resolution
TVTC Resolution 2021-10 and 2020 Nexus Study
413
414
Tri-Valley Transportation Council
2020 Nexus Fee Update Study

TVTC MEMBER AGENCIES

IN ASSOCIATION WITH

AUGUST 2021 | FINAL
Prepared By:

415
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final i

CONTENTS
Acronym List .............................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction and Background ........................................................................................... 1 2 Forecast of New Development and Travel Demand ......................................................... 4 3 Improvement Projects and Cost Estimates .................................................................... 19 4 Nexus Findings .............................................................................................................. 22 5 Next Steps ..................................................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................ 34 Appendix A – Existing TVTC Projects ....................................................................................... 35 Appendix B – Additional TVTC Projects .................................................................................... 52 Appendix C – Project Improvement Categories ......................................................................... 66

416
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final ii

TABLES
Table 1: Total Household Forecasts by Agency ......................................................................... 5 Table 2: Projected Dwelling Unit Growth, 2020-2040 ................................................................. 6 Table 3: Single Family Household Forecasts by Agency ............................................................ 6 Table 4: Multifamily Household Forecasts by Agency ................................................................ 7 Table 5: Total Employment Forecasts by Agency ...................................................................... 8 Table 6: Total Employment Forecasts by Employment Type ...................................................... 9 Table 7: Employment Growth Converted to Square Commercial Building Space ......................13 Table 8: Overall Growth Comparison ........................................................................................13 Table 9: Household Growth Comparison ...................................................................................15 Table 10: Actual Versus Projected 2020 Household Values ......................................................15 Table 11: Employment Growth Comparison ..............................................................................18 Table 12: Actual Versus Projected 2020 Employment Values ...................................................18 Table 13: Existing Projects – List A& B .....................................................................................20 Table 14: New Selected Projects – List C .................................................................................21 Table 15: Methodology and Improvements ...............................................................................24 Table 16: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) .............................25 Table 17: HSIP Crash Saving Dollar Amounts ..........................................................................27 Table 18: Future Safety Benefits with Project Improvements ....................................................27 Table 19: Future Project Induced Daily Bicycle Demand ...........................................................27 Table 20: Safety Benefits with Project C-11 ..............................................................................28 Table 21: AM/PM Peak-Hour Average Trip Rate Comparison Between 7th Edition and 10th Edition .......................................................................................................................................29 Table 22: Total Trip Ends by Land Use Category ......................................................................30 Table 23: Total Fee by Land Use Category ...............................................................................31 Table 24: Total Cost and Maximum Fee by Land Use Category ...............................................32 417
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final iii

FIGURES
Figure 1:Total Household Forecasts by Agency ......................................................................... 6 Figure 2: Single Family Household Forecasts by Agency ........................................................... 7 Figure 3: Multifamily Household Forecasts by Agency ............................................................... 8 Figure 4: Total Employment Forecasts by Agency ..................................................................... 9 Figure 5: Retail Employment Forecasts by Agency ................................................................... 10 Figure 6: Service Employment Forecasts by Agency ................................................................10 Figure 7: Other Employment Forecasts by Agency ................................................................... 11 Figure 9: Manufacturing Employment Forecasts by Agency ......................................................12 Figure 10: Trade/Wholesale Employment Forecasts ................................................................. 12 Figure 11: 2008 Nexus and 2020 Refined Dwelling Unit Forecast .............................................14 Figure 12: 2008 Nexus Study and 2020 Nexus Study Employment Forecast (Retail, Service, Other) .......................................................................................................................................16 Figure 13: 2008 Nexus Study and 2020 Nexus Study Employment Forecast (Agriculture, Manufacturing, Trading) ............................................................................................................17 Figure 14: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) ............................25

418
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final iv

ACRONYM LIST
ACTC Alameda County Transportation Commission
ATP Active Transportation Program
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit
BRT Bus Rapid Transit
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority
CHP California Highway Patrol
CMF Crash Modification Factors
CPM County Program Manager
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FHWA Federal Highway Authority
HOV High Occupancy Vehicle
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
I-580 Interstate 580
I-680 Interstate 680
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
JEPA Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
JPA Joint Power Agreement
LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
OBAG One Bay Area Grant Program
OTS Office of Traffic Safety
PM Post Mile
PSR Project Study Report
PSR-PDS Project Study Report-Project Development Support RRS Routes of Regional Significance
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SAV Shared Autonomous Vehicle
SB 1 Senate Bill 1
SEP Strategic Expenditure Plan
SR 84 State Route 84
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TAZ Traffic Analysis Zone
TBD To Be Determined
TDM Travel Demand Model
419
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final v

TEP Transportation Expenditure Plan
TFCA Transportation Fund for Clean Air
TIF Transportation Improvement Fee
TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership and Cooperation
TSP Transit Signal Priority
TVTC Tri-Valley Transportation Council
TVTDF Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee
TVTP/AP Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan
VHD Vehicle Hours of Delay
420
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Completed and adopted in early 2008, the T ri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) Nexus Study: Fee Update (“2008 Nexus Study”) identified 22 projects that the TVTC elected for eligibility to receive funding from the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF). The first 11 projects (List A, Table 13) were adopted into the original program in 1995. The second set of 11 (List B , Table 13), were new projects that were included in the 2008 Nexus Study. The travel demand modeling documented in the 2008 Nexus Study projected that these projects would reduce the congestion created by ne w development within the Tri - Valley.

Since 2008, there have been changes in the funding, planning and traffic conditions under which the TVTDF was originally developed. In addition, many of the 27 original projects have been completed and the TVTC has identified 23 new projects (List C, Table 14) to be considered. Based on these factors an updated nexus study is needed to support updates to the TVTDF.

FORECAST GROWTH
New development within the Tri-Valley is forecast to add 33,312 household and 63,947 jobs between 2018 and 2040. This growth will produce an increase of 57,596 average AM/PM peak hour trips.

PROJECT B ENEFIT S
Based on forecast projection, the vehicle hour of delay is expected to increase by 60 percent during the AM and 88 percent during the PM peak. With the construction remaining improvement projects, this delay is expected to decrease by 15 percent during the AM peak and 23 percent during the PM peak when compared to the 2040 No- Build Scenario. In addition, these projects will result in other benefits to the Tri - Valley Area including improving roadway safety, improving roadway operations, and increasing bicycle ridership.

Figure E-1: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD)

24,718
15,613
39,570
29,376
35,852
25,813
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour
Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD)
2020 2040 No-Build 2040 Build
421
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final ii

Note: Hours of delay are based on trips with origin or destination in the TVTC region.

UPDATED FEE
The total investment for projects eligible to receive TVTDF funding is estimated to be $4.470 billion, where $3.677 Billion is unfunded. An additional reduction was applied to account for external “cut-though” trips on roadway congestion projects. Future development within the Tri -Valley area is not responsible to pay for these trips since these trips are cause d by growth outside of the Tri-Valley area. This reduces the total unfunded cost to be covered by the maximum TVTDF to $2.928 billion. Note that this does not change the overall project costs.

The $2.928 billion unfunded cost was allocated across future development land use type based on the proportion of forecast peak -hour trips to determine the Total Fee per Land Use. Then the maximum fee schedule was determined by dividing Total Fee per Land Use by the 2020-2040 Growth as shown in Table E-1 below.

Table E-1: Maximum Fee by Land Use Category
Land Use Type Growth Maximum Fee
Single-Family Residential 15,857 DU $43,976 per DU
Multi-Family Residential 17,456 DU $25,928 per DU
Retail 5,117,500 SF $84.52 per SF
Office 6,796,800 SF $58.72 per SF
Industrial 9,289,800 SF $33.81 per SF
Other 12,441 trips* $50,839 per trip*
* Average AM/PM trip
The maximum fee schedule shown in in Table E-1 would generate sufficient revenues to fund the total unfunded cost of all selected projects, however TVTC jurisdictions are not obligated to apply this fee schedule. For instance, the TVTC jurisdiction set rates at approximate 1/3 of the maximum fee calculated in the 1995 and 2008 Nexus studies to help foster growth within the Tri -Valley area, while providing a regional funding source that could be used to match and help compete for Federal and State transportation grants and funding programs.
422
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 1

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

1.1 BACKGROUND AND HISTO RY
In 1991, the seven jurisdictions of Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Danville, and San Ramon signed a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) that established the Tri -Valley Transportation Council (TVTC). The purpose of the JPA was for the joint preparation of a Tri -Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan (TVTP/AP) for Routes of Regional Significance (RRS) and cost sharing of recommended improvements. The TVTP/AP was prepared and presented to all member jurisdictions in April 1995 and updated in 2000. The TVTP/AP created a common understanding and agreement on the Tri-Valley’s transportation concerns regarding prioritizing projects for funding and implementation.

In addition to the project priorities, the TVTP/AP also recommended the development of a TVTDF to allocate a fair share of regional infrastructure cost to go towards new development. The nexus study for the fee program, completed in 1995, justified allocating the unfunded cost needed to complete all of the 11 projects identified in the TVTP/AP to new development. The TVTC, however, recommended scaling back by roughly two-thirds the total amount the fee program would collect from the maximum funding needed. The TVTC and its member jurisdictions subsequently created and adopted the TVTDF in 1998 through a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA). The original Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP) was adopted in 1999.

The JEPA called for a periodic update of the fee program to reflect any significant changes in population growth, project status, and other conditions that would require revisions t o the fee program. Since 1995, there have been substantial changes in the funding, planning, and traffic setting in which the TVTDF was originally developed. New funding sources were established; the TVTP/AP was updated in 2000; projects were completed; project schedules and/or funding plans shifted; traffic patterns changed; and new regional transportation projects were identified through various traffic studies. The TVTC responded to these changes by directing the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to con duct its first update to the fee nexus study to update the fee and project list.

Completed and adopted in early 2008, the first update to the TVTC Nexus Study: Fee Update (“2008 Nexus Study”) identified 22 projects that the TVTC elected for eligibility to receive funding from the TVTDF. The first 11 projects (List A, Table 13) were adopted into the original program in 1995. The second set of 11 (List B, Table 13) , were new projects that were included in the 2008 Nexus Study. The travel demand modeling documented in the 2008 Nexus Study projected that these projects would further reduce congestion created by new development within the Tri -Valley. A revised fee structure was released by TVTC for consideration by each member agency in late 2008. While each mem ber agency communicated support for the revised fee structure, it was not approved by all member agencies pending preparation and approval of a corresponding SEP. A TVTC SEP Subcommittee was therefore formed to commence preparation of an SEP.

To facilitate the progress of existing projects while an update to the SEP was underway, an Interim Funding Plan was approved by TVTC in April 2010. The Interim Funding Plan matched the programmed amounts and priorities established in the 2004 SEP Update. It also included a revised disbursement timeline to reflect the current Joint TVTDF account balance and projected fee collections over the next five years.

With respect to the TVTC JEPA, in October 2013 TVTC entered into a new Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) comprised of seven member agencies: the County of Alameda, the County of Contra Costa, the City of Livermore, the City of Pleasanton, the City of San Ramon, the City of Dublin, and the Town of Danville. The purpose of the new JEPA agreement was to establish the TVTC as a separate agency responsible for planning, coordinating, and receiving disbursement of traffic impact fee 423
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 2

revenues from member agencies to help implement transportation improvement projects within the Tri - Valley Area.

Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP)
In January 2015, the TVTC adopted Resolution No. 2015- 01 – Adopting the updated Tri -Valley Transportation Development Fee Schedule as a two- year phase-in plan, with no change during the initial year (FY 14-15), an increase to 25% of the maximum allowable r ate by the fee nexus study in the second year (FY 15-16) and a final increase to 35% of the maximum allowable rate by the third year (FY 16- 17).

The new fee was based on the Fee Nexus Study adopted in 2008.

In November 2015, a review of the 2008 Nexus St udy was conducted to determine if the analysis establishing a reasonable relationship between the unexpended fees and the purpose for which those fees were collected remained valid. This review analyzed the 2008 Nexus Study Fee Update with current traffic conditions, forecasted growth, and project updates and found that the analysis establishing a reasonable relationship between the unexpended fees and the purpose of which those fees were collected was still valid. The review also identified a number of conditions that had changed since the completion of the 2008 Nexus Study, such as growth projections were lower in the more recent forecasts than at the time of the 2008 Nexus Study. This translated to lower trip generation rate from new development. In addit ion, a number of the projects in the Nexus Study had been completed or had a change in project description or cost estimate. However, due to inflation and updated cost estimates, the total unfunded project cost had only decreased by 9 percent. The minor decrease in unfunded cost, paired with a decrease in expected new peak hour trips to which the fee would be applied, meant that the maximum fee identified in the 2008 Nexus Study would be higher in an updated calculation.

In January 2017, the TVTC approved the 2008 TVTC Nexus Study Validation Review and adopted the 2017 Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP)* Update. At that time, the TVTC elected to maintain the current fee rate, with exception of the annual Construction Cost Index (CCI) adjustment . The 2017 SE P update incorporated and built upon the updated project descriptions, funding programs, and progression of the TVTDF over the previous six years. Some of the transportation improvement projects on the original list were completed and schedules and funding for others had changed. The JEPA, adopted in 2013, required approval for the SEP, by a supermajority of the TVTC – six members.

Since 2008, there have been changes in the funding, planning and traffic conditions under which the TVTDF was originally developed. In addition, many of the 22 projects have been completed and the TVTC has identified 16 new projects (List C , Table 14) to be considered. Based on these factors the 2020 updated nexus study was undertaken.

On August 16, 2021, the TVTC approved Resolut ion No. 2021-10 Adopting the Tri -Valley Transportation Council 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study.

424
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 3

1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION
The remainder of the report is divided into the following chapters:
• Chapter 2 - Forecast of New Development and Travel Demand: Describes the methodology, assumption, and results used to determine future development forecast • Chapter 3 - Improvement Projects and Cost Estimates: Presents list of improvement projects the TVTC elected to receive funding from the TVTDF. Detailed project descriptions are provided in Appendix A and Appendix B.
• Chapter 4 - Nexus Findings: Describes relevant findings for the imposition of development impact fees,
• Chapter 5 - Next Steps: Identifies next steps for adopting the updated fee schedule.

425
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 4

2 FORECAST OF NEW DEVELOPMENT AND TRAVEL DEMAND
This chapter describes the methodology, assumption, and results for travel demand forecasting.

2.1 METHODOLOGY AND APPR OACH
Travel demand forecasting was conducted using the current version of Contra Cos ta Transportation Authority Travel Demand Model (CCTA TDM). The use of the CCTA TDM is consistent with the previous 2008 Nexus Study. Based on the outcome of initial discussions with the TAC , the following steps were taken regarding the development of travel demand forecasts:
• Travel demand forecasting was reaffirmed to be based on the latest version of CCTA TDM. In 2019, the CCTA TDM was updated to incorporate assumptions consistent with the current (as of 2017) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). A 2018 base year validation was also completed as part of that update. The growth projections were based on a base year of 2020 and a horizon year of 2040. Note that the CCTA TDM base year was updated to reflect 2020 conditions and that the 2040 horizon year was also modified to address the specific needs of this study.
• Land use assumptions for households and employment were broken down for the 2020 base and 2040 horizon years by jurisdiction and were distributed to member agencies for review. Detailed data submitted to each jurisdiction included household and employment data at the traffic analysis zone (TAZ) level. In addition, supplemental data from the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) travel demand model was also provided to member agencies within Alameda County. Kimley Horn worked closely with the individual agencies to appropriately finalize growth forecasts prior to their use in the final modeling for this study.

Given that a recent land use forecast f or the Tri-Valley region already exists as incorporated into the 2019 update of the CCTA Model, it is important to provide a context for the basis of this forecast. Specifically, the focus of this effort, unlike the more recent application of the CCTA model which was in support of a Region‐ Wide RTP, is confined to a limited area that primarily includes City of Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Danville, and San Ramon and parts of unincorporated Contra Costa and Alameda counties. As this constitutes sub‐area analysis (although the entirety of the model will be used during analysis), the typical best practice includes carefully assessing land use within the study area to make sure that it is prepared in a manner consistent with the specific goals of the study for which the TDM will be applied. It is important to note that TDMs used in support of RTPs are prepared in accordance with strict control totals and, as such, their land use forecasts do not necessarily reflect certainty as to whether a given development wi ll occur, rather they are more akin to a process of prioritization (the forecaster determines the magnitude and location of development that is most likely to occur rather than determining whether something will NOT occur). Not surprisingly, local jurisdictions sometimes have more detailed perspectives on whether certain concentrations of development within their communities will occur before the RTP planning horizon. A land use assessment, such as that carried out as part of a typical sub‐ area analysis, is often an opportunity to reconsider jurisdictional land use input without the necessary limitations that an RTP puts on land use forecasting.

Based on these considerations and information shared by the TAC members, as well as input from staff from the member agencies at several individual agency meetings, it was determined that the 2040 land use forecast for the study area as included in the 2019 version of the CCTA TDM had unlikely development patterns in several locations within the study area as compared to the collective perspectives of member 426
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 5

agencies. Accordingly, it was agreed that a process to refine the existing CCTA forecast in a manner that could be reasonably justified based on readily available information and data would be undertaken.

Specifically, this forecast is intended to reflect both realistic and achievable 2040 growth within the study area, and not necessarily circumstances that would be reflective of the full potential of the study area or an overly conservative approach such as a “worst‐case” scenario.

2.2 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECA ST
This section presents the growth forecast based on feedback from member agencies.

2.2.1 HOUSEHOLD GROWTH
Table 1 and Figure 1 summaries the estimated household growth between 2020 and 2040 the resulted from the process described in the prior section. Between 20 20 and 2040 there is an expected total growth of 33,312 households within the Tri-Valley Area. This equates to a 24 percent change or an annual growth rate of 1.09%.

Table 1: Total Household Forecasts by Agency
Agency 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Danville 15,564 16,557 993 6% 0.31%
Dublin 21,708 29,105 7,397 34% 1.48%
Livermore 30,685 39,759 9,074 30% 1.30%
Pleasanton 27,783 34,099 6,316 23% 1.03%
San Ramon 27,624 36,638 9,014 33% 1.42%
Alameda Unincorporated 2,108 2,362 254 12% 0.57%
Contra Costa Unincorporated 11,921 12,185 264 2% 0.11%
Total Tri-Valley 137,393 170,705 33,312 24% 1.09%

427
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 6

Figure 1:Total Household Forecasts by Agency
Table 2 presents the overall change based on dwelling type. As shown, it is expected that single family units will grow by 15,856 units at an annual growth rate of 0.69 %. It is expected that multi -family units will go by 17,456 units at an annual growth rate of 2.35%. Table 3 and Figure 2 summarizes growth for single family household by agency. Table 4 and Figure 3 summarizes the growth for multifamily households by agency.

Table 2: Projected Dwelling Unit Growth, 2020-2040
Dwelling Type 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Single Family 107,944 123,800 15,856 15% 0.69%
Multifamily 29,449 46,905 17,456 59% 2.35%
Total 137,393 170,705 33,312 24% 1.09%

Table 3: Single Family Household Forecasts by Agency
Agency 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Danville 14,346 14,882 536 4% 0.18%
Dublin 14,579 17,506 2,927 20% 0.92%
Livermore 23,631 29,091 5,460 23% 1.04%
Pleasanton 20,689 24,202 3,513 17% 0.79%
San Ramon 21,704 24,821 3,117 14% 0.67%
Alameda Unincorporated 1,767 1,953 186 11% 0.50%
Contra Costa Unincorporated 11,228 11,345 117 1% 0.05%
Total Tri-Valley 107,944 123,800 15,856 15% 0.69%
6%, 993
34%, 7,397
30%, 9,074
23%, 6,316 33%, 9,014
12%, 254
2%, 264
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Dwelling Units
Existing Total Household Total Household Growth
428
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 7

Figure 2: Single Family Household Forecasts by Agency

Table 4: Multifamily Household Forecasts by Agency
Agency 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Danville 1,218 1,675 457 38% 1.61%
Dublin 7,129 11,599 4,470 63% 2.46%
Livermore 7,054 10,668 3,614 51% 2.09%
Pleasanton 7,094 9,897 2,803 40% 1.68%
San Ramon 5,920 11,817 5,897 100% 3.52%
Alameda Unincorporated 341 409 68 20% 0.91%
Contra Costa Unincorporated 693 840 147 21% 0.97%
Total Tri-Valley 29,449 46,905 17,456 59% 2.35%

4%, 536 20%, 2,927
23%, 5,460
17%, 3,513 14%, 3,117
11%, 186
1%, 117
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Dwelling Units
Existing Single Family Single Family Growth
429
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 8

Figure 3: Multifamily Household Forecasts by Agency

2.2.2 EMPLOYMENT GROWTH
Table 5 and Figure 4 summarizes the estimated employment growth between 2020 and 2040. Between 2020 and 2040 there is an expected total growth of 63,947 jobs within the Tri -Valley Area. This equates to an approximate 30% change or an annual growth rate of 1. 34%. Detailed information for specific Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) are included in Attachment B and C.

Table 5: Total Employment Forecasts by Agency
Agency 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Danville 19,330 19,519 189 1% 0.05%
Dublin 23,402 32,716 9,314 40% 1.69%
Livermore 46,038 66,795 20,757 45% 1.88%
Pleasanton 62,196 86,489 24,293 39% 1.66%
San Ramon 50,539 59,027 8,488 17% 0.78%
Alameda Unincorporated 4,358 4,913 555 13% 0.60%
Contra Costa Unincorporated 4,460 4,811 351 8% 0.38%
Total Tri-Valley 210,323 274,270 63,947 30% 1.34%

38%, 457
63%, 4,470
51%, 3,614 40%, 2,803 100%, 5,897
20%, 68 21%, 147
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Dwelling Units
Existing Multifamily MultiFamily Growth
430
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 9

Figure 4: Total Employment Forecasts by Agency

Table 6 presents the estimate growth between the base year of 2020 and the 2040 horizon year by employment type. Manufacturing, Service, and Other-type employment are forecasted to have the highest growth with a 60%, 33%, and 31% change, respectively. Retail and Trade/Wholesale-type employment are forecasted to have the smaller growth with a 20% and 19% change respectively. Agricultural-type employee is expected to have very little change. Figure 5 through Figure 10 summarizes the growth for each employment type by agency.

Table 6: Total Employment Forecasts by Employment Type
Employment Type 2020 2040 2020-2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Rate
Retail 50,168 60,403 10,235 20% 0.93%
Service 69,029 91,685 22,656 33% 1.43%
Other 67,621 88,356 20,735 31% 1.35%
Agricultural 1,225 1,224 -1 0% 0.00%
Manufacturing 14,942 23,842 8,900 60% 2.36%
Trade/Wholesale 7,338 8,760 1,422 19% 0.89%
Total Employment 210,323 274,270 63,947 30% 1.34%
Note:

Service employment includes professional services/offices, public administration, health services, educational services, hotel, etc.

Other employment includes car washes, repair-maintenance services, personal care services, civic and social organization etc.

1%, 189
40%, 9,314
45%, 20,757
39%, 24,293
17%, 8,488
13%, 555 8%, 351
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Total Employment Total Employment Growth
431
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 10

Figure 5: Retail Employment Forecasts by Agency

Figure 6: Service Employment Forecasts by Agency

4%, 166
9%, 711
50%, 3,468
19%, 3,864
25%, 1,817
8%, 85 10%, 124
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Retail Employment Retail Employment Growth
0%, 3
57%, 3,770
28%, 3,900
57%, 10,666
20%, 3,958
20%, 270 5%, 89
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Service Employment Service Employment Growth
432
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 11

Figure 7: Other Employment Forecasts by Agency

2%, 128 56%, 3,762
41%, 7,083
44%, 6,952 14%, 2,521
13%, 159 10%, 130
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Other Employment Other Employment Growth
-71%, -90
6%, 3
16%, 37
3%, 4
6%, 38
10%, 7
0%, 0
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Agriculture Employment Agriculture Employment Growth 433
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 12

Figure 8: Manufacturing Employment Forecasts by Agency

Figure 9: Trade/Wholesale Employment Forecasts

-1%, -3
85%, 903
130%, 5,472 43%, 2,358
4%, 147
7%, 16 7%, 7
-2,000
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Manufacturing Employment Manufacturing Employment Growth -4%, -15
24%, 165
23%, 797
36%, 449 1%, 7
6%, 18
1%, 1
-1,000
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
Danville Dublin Livermore Pleasanton San Ramon Alameda
Unincorporated
Contra Costa
Unincorporated
Employment
Existing Trade/Wholesale Employment Trade/Wholesale Employment Growth 434
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 13

Employment growth was converted to square feet of commercial building space based on employee density assumed from the 2008 Nexus Study. These conversions are shown in Table 7 below.

Table 7: Employment Growth Converted to Square Commercial Building Space Land Use
Type
Employee Growth
2020-2040
Employee Density
(SF/Employee)
In Building Square
Footage 2020-2040
Retail 10,235 500 5,117,572
Office/Service 22,656 300 6,796,911
Industrial1 10,321 900 9,289,204
Other 20,735 600 12,440,969
Total 63,947 - 33,644,656
1 Industrial includes agriculture, manufacturing, and trading employment-types.

2.2.3 COMPARISON WITH 2008 NEXUS STU DY
A comparison of the total growth (base year to horizon year) and the annual growth rates between the 2008 Nexus Study and the 2020 Nexus Study forecast is presented in Table 8. The household growth estimated in the current 2020 Nexus Study is approximately half as much as estimated in the 2008 Nexus Study. The employment growth is estimated to be slightly lower than the 2008 Nexus Study. A slower build-out results in smaller amount of development being available to pay towards improvement project s.

Table 8: Overall Growth Comparison

Total Growth Annual Growth
Household Employment Household Employment
2008 Nexus Study
(2007 to 2030 Growth) 51% 42% 1.81% 1.54%
2020 Nexus Study
(2020 to 2040 Growth) 24% 30% 1.09% 1.34%
Detailed comparison household and employment are discussed in the following sections.

2.2.3.1 Household
Table 9, Table 10 and Figure 11 presents a comparison of the household growth between 2008 Nexus Study and the 2020 refined growth forecast. Single family housing experienced 4% less growth than anticipated in the 2008 Nexus Study. Multifamily housing experienced 10% less growth than anticipated in the 2008 Nexus Study. The multifamily growth trend is similar between the 2008 and 2020 Nexus Study.

435
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 14

Figure 10: 2008 Nexus and 2020 Refined Dwelling Unit Forecast

0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Dwelling Units
2008 Nexus - Single Family 2020 Update - Single Family
2008 Nexus - Multifamily 2020 Update - Multifamily
436
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 15

Table 9: Household Growth Comparison
Dwelling Type
2008 Nexus Study 2020 Nexus Study
2007 2030
2007-
2030
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth 2018 2040
2020-
2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Single Family 91,136 129,818 38,682 42% 1.55% 107,944 123,800 15,856 15% 0.69% Multifamily 21,959 41,042 19,083 87% 2.76% 29,449 46,905 17,456 59% 2.35% Total 113,095 170,860 57,765 51% 1.81% 137,393 170,705 33,312 24% 1.09%

Table 10: Actual Versus Projected 2020 Household Values Dwelling Type 2020
Projected
2020
Actual Difference Percent
Difference
Single Family 113,000 107,944 -5,056 -4%
Multifamily 32,745 29,449 -3,296 -10%
Total 145,745 137,393 -8,352 -6%
Note: 2020 Projected assumes linear growth based on 2007-2030 growth assumed in 2008 Nexus Study

437
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 16

2.2.3.2 Employment
Table 11, Table 12, Figure 12, and Figure 13 presents a comparison of the employment growth between 2008 Nexus Study and the 2020 Nexus Study . All employment types except for Other are forecast to experience less growth than anticipated in the 2008 Nexus Study. Retail and Other employment experience higher growth at 15% and 8% more than 2020 estimate. For Agriculture employment, there was a -7% difference. Service, manufacturing, and trading employment experienced the greatest difference, ranging from -37% to -43% compared to employment numbers anticipated for 2020 in 2008 Nexus Study. While the actual numbers differ from the anticipated growth assumed in 2008 Nexus Study, the 2020 Nexus Study is anticipating similar growth trends as the previous study for all employment types.

Figure 11: 2008 Nexus Study and 2020 Nexus Study Employment Forecast (Retail, Service, Other) 0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Employment
2008 Nexus - Retail 2020 Update - Retail
2008 Nexus - Service 2020 Update - Service
2008 Nexus - Other 2020 Update - Other
438
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 17

Figure 12: 2008 Nexus Study and 2020 Nexus Study Employment Forecast (Agriculture, Manufacturing, Trading)

0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Employment
2008 Nexus Agriculture 2020 Update - Agriculture
2008 Nexus - Manufacturing 2020 Update - Manufacturing
2008 Nexus - Trading 2020 Update - Trading
439
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 18

Table 11: Employment Growth Comparison
Employment
Type
2008 Nexus Study 2020 Nexus Study
2007 2030
2007-
2030
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth 2020 2040
2020-
2040
Growth
Percent
Change
Annual
Growth
Retail 36,806 48,927 12,121 33% 1.25% 50,168 60,403 10,235 20% 0.93% Service 83,608 129,427 45,819 55% 1.92% 69,029 91,685 22,656 33% 1.43% Other 54,076 69,459 15,383 28% 1.09% 67,621 88,356 20,735 31% 1.35% Agriculture 1,483 1,182 -301 -20% -0.98% 1,225 1,224 -1 0% 0.00% Manufacturing 20,048 30,895 10,847 54% 1.90% 14,942 23,842 8,900 60% 2.36% Trading 10,986 14,371 3,385 31% 1.17% 7,338 8,760 1,422 19% 0.89% Total 207,007 294,261 87,254 42% 1.54% 210,323 274,270 63,947 30% 1.34%

Table 12: Actual Versus Projected 2020 Employment Values Employment
Type
2020
Projected
2020
Actual Difference Percent
Difference
Retail 42,603 42,603 7,565 15%
Service 105,521 105,521 -36,492 -37%
Other 61,433 61,433 6,188 8%
Agriculture 1,339 1,339 -114 -7%
Manufacturing 25,236 25,236 -10,294 -43%
Trading 12,605 12,605 -5,267 -43%
Total 248,737 248,737 -38,414 -18%
Note: 2020 Projected assumes linear growth based on 2007-2030 growth assumed in 2008 Nexus Study 440
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 19

3 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND COST ESTIMATES
This chapter presents the 38 improvement projects included as part of the 2020 Nexus Updates.

3.1 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
There are 38 improvement projects that th e TVTC has included in the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) for the 2020 Nexus Study . Of those projects, 15 projects exist in the current TVTDF and 23 that are to be considered as part of this nexus update study.

3.1.1 CURRENT PROJECT LIST
Current projects are divided into two lists. The first list, List A, includes 7 projects that were included in the original program adopted in 1995. The second list, List B, includes 8 projects that were included in the 2008 Nexus Study.

Out of the 27 existing projects, 10 projects have been completed and are no longer considered for further funding. In addition, two projects (B -9 Danville Boulevard/Stone Valley Road I -680 Intersection and B-11a I-680 HOV Direct Access Ramps) have been removed from the project list and are no longer being considered for funding (for a total of 12 projects removed from the prior lists). The remaining projects have not been fully completed. Table 13 summaries the projects in List A and B along with their total project costs and their remaining unfunded cost. Detailed description of projects in Lists A and B are provided in Appendix A.

3.1.2 NEW SELECTED PROJECT LIST
With almost half of the current project list completed and no longer receiving funding, TVTC reviewed and selected additional projects to be considered for receiving funding from the TVTDF. This selection process involved a comprehensive planning process to develop a project list that mitigates the impacts of new development based on feasibility and stakeholder support. From this process, 23 additional projects (List C) were identified to receive funding from the TVTDF. List C projects, along with their total project costs and their remaining unfunded costs are listed in Table 14. Detailed descriptions of projects in List C are provided in Appendix B.

3.2 UNFUNDED COST
Tables 13 and 14 presents total project cost and their remaining unfunded cost. The total investment for projects eligible to receive TVTDF funding is estimated to be $4.470 billion, where $3.677 billion is unfunded. An additional reduction was applied to account for external “cut-though” trips on roadway congestion projects. Future development within the Tri-Valley area is not responsible to pay for these trips since these trips are caused by growth outside of the Tri-Valley area. This reduces the total unfunded cost to be covered by the maximum TVTDF to $2.928 billion. Note that this does not change the overall project costs.

The funded amount includes the current TVTDF amount currently allocated toward projects as well as additional federal, state, regional, or local funding sources. Based on input received from member 441
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 20

jurisdictions, it is anticipated that approximately $793.24 million of funding has been identified for the current project list. Appendices A and B include a cost estimate and a portfolio of likely funding sources.

Table 13: Existing Projects – List A& B
Project
Total Cost
(2021
$Millions)
Unfunded
Cost
(2021
$Millions)
A-1 Interstate 580 (I-580)/Interstate 680 (I-680) Interchange (southbound to eastbound) - -
A-2a State Route 84 (SR 84) Expressway (I-580 to I-680) $325.4 - A-2b SR 84/I-580 Interchange $22.7 $6.42
A-3 I-680 Auxiliary Lanes (Segment 2) - -
A-4 West Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station - -
A-5a I-580 Eastbound Auxiliary Lane - -
A-5b I-580 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane Westbound - - A-6 I-680 HOV Lanes, SR 84 to Top of Sunol Grade - -
A-7 I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road Interchange
Modifications - -
A-8 I-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange - -
A-9a Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 1 $10.87 $8.42 A-9b Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 2 $58.77 $57.08 A-10a Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 1 $40.57 $11.14 A-10b Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 2 $31.20 $28.62 A-11 Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – Phase 2 $22.35 $21.21 B-1 I-580/I-680 Interchange (westbound to southbound) $1,785.65 $1,746.65 B-2 Fifth Eastbound Lane on I-580 from Santa Rita Road to Vasco Road - -
B-3 I-580/First Street Interchange Modification $61.00 $7.93 B-4 I-580/Vasco Road Interchange Modification $85.65 $16.61 B-5 I-580/Greenville Road Interchange Modification $86.00 $18.92 B-6 Jack London Boulevard Extension $28.16 $10.08
B-7 El Charro Road Extension (Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard to Stanley Boulevard) $72.48 $72.48
B-8 Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Widening Project (East of Blackhawk Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive) $88.08 $54.55 B-9 Danville Boulevard/Stone Valley Road I-680 Interchange Improvements - -
B-10 I-680 Southbound HOV Lane Gap Closure (North Main Street to Rudgear Road)
-
-
B-11a I-680 HOV Direct Access Ramps - -
B-11b I-680 Transit Corridor Improvements $277.85 $274.85 Note: Completed or removed projects that are no longer considered for further funding are shaded.

442
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 21

Table 14: New Selected Projects – List C
Project Total Cost
(Millions)
Unfunded Cost
(Millions)
C-1 Tesla Road Safety Improvements $13.19 $13.19
C-2 Norris Canyon Road Safety Improvement $24.49 $18.49 C-3 Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extensions $160.39 $134.91 C-4 Vasco Road at Dalton Avenue Intersection Improvements $3.39 $3.39 C-5 El Charro Road Widening $68.09 $38.09
C-6 Sunol/680 Interchange Improvements $16.60 $7.60
C-7 I-680 Express Lanes – Hwy 84 to Alcosta $527.57 $507.57 C-8 Santa Rita/I-580 Interchange $10.33 $2.63
C-9 Stoneridge/I-680 Interchange $11.98 $4.08
C-10 Innovate 680 $57.21 $54.66
C-11a Iron Horse Trail Bicycle-Pedestrian Overcrossing – Bollinger Canyon Road $22.88 $8.58
C-11b Iron Horse Trail Bicycle-Pedestrian Overcrossing – Crow Canyon Road $19.69 $19.69
C-11c Iron Horse Trail – Dublin $11.60 -
C-11d Iron Horse Trail – Livermore $26.99 $26.99
C-11e Iron Horse Trail to Shadow Cliffs $1.65 $0.30
C-11f Iron House Trail Connection Improvements at Santa Rita Road $0.87 $0.48
C-11g Iron Horse Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing – Sycamore Valley Road $19.78 $19.78
C-11h Iron Horse Trail Safety Improvements $85.60 $85.60 C-12 Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Improvements $39.13 $34.50 C-13 Fallon/El Charro Interchange Improvements $34.51 $19.96 C-14 Valley Link Rail (Phase 1) $258.25 $258.25
C-15 Technology Enhancements $0.33 $0.33
C-16 I-680 Express Bus Service $59.35 $59.35

443
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 22

4 NEXUS FINDINGS
This chapter presents the relationship of between the increase travel demand from new development , the cost of improvements needed to accommodate that growth, and the impact fee to fund those investments.

4.1 OVERALL METHODOLOGY
Impact fees may be calculated using a purely technical method that would fund the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The four steps followed in any development impact fee study include the following:

1. Prepare growth projections;

2. Identify facility standards;

3. Determine the amount and cost of facilities required to accommodate new development based on facility standards and growth projections; and

4. Calculate the public facilities fee by allocating the total cost of facilities per unit of development.

This nexus study results in a calculation of the maximum fee based on the list of projects identified in Chapter 3 (and described in Appendices A and B) to the greatest extent technically defensible under the Mitigation Fee Act. Consistent with the TVTC’s directions, the full cost of funding these improvements is used to calculate the maximum fee rates the TVTC could apply to all new residential and non- residential development in the Tri-Valley between 2020 and 2040.

4.2 MITIGATION FEE A CT FINDINGS
Development impact fees are one-time fees typically paid when a building permit is issued and imposed on development projects by local agencies responsible for regulating land use (cities and counties). To guide the widespread imposition of public facilities fees, the State Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act (Act) with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1987 and subsequent amendments. The Act, contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025, establishes requirements on local agencies for the imposition and administration of fee programs. The Act requires local agencies to document five findings when adopting a fee.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the TVTC updated impact fee were adopted when the first TVTC fee was adopted in 1995 and subsequently again when the Nexus Study was updated in 2008 and 2017. They are presented here and supported by the Nexus Analysis section (Chapter 2) of this report.

All statutory references below are to the Act. This sample framework for the Mitigation Fee Act findings is only to provide local agencies with guidance and is not a substitute for legal advice. Local agencies will customize the findings for their jurisdiction and consult with their legal counsel prior to adoption of the updated TVTDF.

4.2.1 PURPOSE OF FEE
For the first finding, the local agency must identify the purpose of the fee (Section 66001(a)(1)). The TVTC policy, as expressed through the TVTC Action Plan, is that new development shall contribute for mitigation of their impacts on the Routes of Regional Significance, and that the cost sharing of recommended improvements will be implemented through the TVTDF regional impact fee progra m. This is administered by the seven jurisdictions of Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Danville, and San Ramon, which all signed a joint powers authority (JPA). The fee advances a legitimate 444
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 23

public interest by enabling the TVTC to fund improvements to transportation infrastructure required to accommodate new development.

4.2.2 USE OF FEE REVENUES
For the second finding, the local agency must identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan, as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made i n other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged (Section 66001(a)(2)). The TVTDF will fund expanded facilities on the Routes of Regional Significance to serve new development. These facilities include the followi ng:
• Roadway widening;
• Roadway extension;
• Traffic signal coordination and other traffic improvements; • Freeway interchanges and related freeway improvements; • Active transportation (pedestrian/bicycle) improvements; • Safety improvements needed to mitigate the higher volume of traffic generated by new development on a major arterial or other regional facility; and • Improvements required for regional express bus and rail transit.

4.3 BENEFIT RELATIONSHIP
The nexus must show a reasonable benefit relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development project upon which the fee is imposed. In other words, the nexus must demonstrate that the improvement projects will mitigate the impacts of new development upon which the fee is imposed. This section describes the methodology and results for establishing the benefit relationship.

4.3.1 METHODOLOGY
The previous 2008 Nexus Study used a model-based delay methodology to determine how List A and List B would mitigate the impacts of new development by comparing vehicle hours of delay (VHD) from the 2005 base year with the Future 2030 No- build and Future 2030 Build scenarios. Given that some of the new recommended projects cannot be effectively analyzed using this same methodology, additional methodologies are being introduced as part of thi s update to appropriately assess the benefits of some select projects.

To facilitate this approach, projects were aggregated into different improvement categories. These categories include roadway capacity, transit, safety, pedestrian/bicycle, intersection, and technology. If the project’s benefit could not be sufficiently analyzed based on model-delay, either because the project could not be reflected in the model or that the model is insensitive to the benefits associated with a specific project, the project was categorized as a safety, pedestrian/bicycle, intersection, or technology improvement and accordingly analyzed using off -model techniques. Since these improvement categories improve different aspects of the transportation system, differing methodol ogies and measures of effectiveness (MOEs) are necessary to appropriately evaluate their anticipated benefit to the transportation system. It should be noted some projects could be categorized into multiple improvement types; however, projects were limited to the category which best reflects their primary benefit for the purposes of supporting this Nexus Study. Table 445
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 24

15 summarizes the different methodology and MOEs that are proposed for this evaluation. A full list of how each project was categorized is included in Appendix C.

Table 15: Methodology and Improvements
Improvement
Type Methodology MOE/Benefit
Roadway
Capacity Model-based Delay
• AM and PM Peak Hour Delay (combined
with Transit and Pedestrian/Bicycle
Improvement Categories)
Transit Model-based Delay
• AM and PM Peak Hour Delay (combined
with Capacity and Pedestrian/Bicycle
Improvement Categories)
Safety Crash Reduction Factors
• Crash Reduction Estimates
• Qualitative Assessment of Resultant Delay
Reduction
Pedestrian/
Bicycle
Planning-level Assessment
Based on NCHRP 552
• Delay Based on the Conversion of
Estimated Commuter Usage of Proposed
Facilities (combined with Capacity
• and Transit Improvement Categories)
• Crash Reduction Estimates
Intersection Planning-level Assessment • Qualitative Assessment of Resultant Delay Reduction
Technology Planning-level Assessment • Qualitative Assessment of Resultant Delay Reduction

4.3.2 ROADWAY CAPACITY AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS
Roadway capacity projects include improvements that involve increasing capacity such as widening a roadway to add additional through lanes or extending existing roadways. Transit projects include improvements that upgrade or expand existing tr ansit service or assist with the implementation of new transit routes and services. Both roadway capacity and transit improvement projects were evaluated based on region wide delay derived using the CCTA travel demand model. Morning and evening region wide peak hours of delay from the two future scenarios, 2040 No-Build (without improvement projects) and 2040 Build (with improvement projects), were compared to the 2020 base year conditions.

The 2040 No-Build scenario is based on a year 2040 transportation network that will carry all of the locally produced or attracted new trips, but that only includes improvements that are expected to be funded under the financially-constrained RTP without the proposed Tri -Valley Transportation Development Fee projects (List A, B, and C) . The 2040 Build scenario is based on a year 204 0 transportation network that includes all the additional improvements that are expected to be funded with the updated Tri -Valley Transportation Development Fee. Both the 2040 No- Build and 2040 Build project scenarios include all of the travel associated with new development within the Tri -Valley. Under both scenarios, travel associated with through trips was excluded from the resultant delay summary (i.e., trips that have origins and destinations outside the Tri-Valley). Excluding through trips is common practice for this analysis given that the impact of this travel is not generated by land uses within the Tri -Valley area and therefor assessing a fee is impractical.

The improvement projects were evaluated using the aggregate regional peak-hour average weekday VHD delay on all the significant roadways (includes freeways, expressways arterials, and major collectors) in the 446
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 25

Tri-Valley on the 2020 Base Year networks and the 2040 No-Build and Build networks. The aggregate VHD provide a reasonable system wide measure of the impact of new development on congestion and mobility.

According to the CCTA travel demand model, between 2020 and 2040, if no projects are undertaken, the number of AM peak hours of delay is expected to increase 60 percent from 24,718 to 39,570 hours, while the number of PM peak hours of delay is expected to escalate 88 percent from 15,613 to 29,376 hours. If the projects are undertaken, the number of AM peak hours of delay would decrease 15 percent compared to the 2040 No-Build scenario, whereas, the number of PM peak hour of delay would decrease 23 percent.

This modest improvement demonstrates that the proposed improvement projects only partially mitigate future congestion by new development. Table 16 and Figure 14 show the comparison between the Future 2040 Build and Future 2040 No-Build scenarios.

In the aggregate, the comparison between the three scenarios showed that: 1) the 2020 Base Year conditions are better than the Futur e 2040 No-Build conditions; 2) the Future 2040 Build conditions are better than the Future 2040 No-Build; and 3) the Future 2040 Build conditions are not better than the 2020 Base Year conditions. These comparisons demonstrated that, in the aggregate, new development does not fund infrastructure needed to address existing deficiency caused by existing development.

Table 16: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) Peak Period 2020 Base
Year
Future 2040 Difference
No-Build Build No-Build Build
AM Peak Hour 24,718 39,570 35,852 60% 45%
PM Peak Hour 15,613 29,376 25,813 88% 65%
Note: Hours of delay are based on trips with origin or destination in the TVTC region.

Figure 13: Future Build vs No Build Scenario Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD)

Note: Hours of delay are based on trips with origin or destination in the TVTC region. 24,718
15,613
39,570
29,376
35,852
25,813
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour
Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD)
2020 2040 No-Build 2040 Build
447
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 26

In addition to reducing VHD, many roadway capacity and transit projects include additional secondary benefits to the transportation system. Many of these projects will result in safety benefits, as congestion can often exacerbate unsafe motoring conditions. Additionally, specific project attributes such as modifying interchanges or widening roadways to provide additional lanes so vehicles can safely maneuver along the roadway or provide space for slower moving vehicles during peak times can also improve safety . Other common project benefits may include pedestrian and bicycle improvements either directly or indirectly. For example, interchange can often be barriers for bicycles and pedestrian, however several of the interchange projects (e.g. C -12: Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Improvements and C-13: Fallon/El Charro Interchange Improvements) include bicycle and pedestrian improvements which close existing gaps and encourage more pedestrian and bicycle activity.

Based on t his analysis it is determined that the planned projects identified in this report will expand the capacity of the Routes of Regional Signif icance to accommodate the increased trips generated by new development and thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee for these projects and the new development on which the fee will be imposed.

4.3.3 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Safety projects involves safety -related improvements such as shoulder widening, installing guardrail, installing median barriers, or realigning roadway. For these projects, a crash reduction factor was calculated based on each safety improvements being implemented. The crash reductions were subsequently applied to crash forecasts for the purpose of identifying future benefits. The safety improvements considered in the evaluation are listed below:
• California Highway Patrol (CHP)
Enforcement Area
• Intersection
Improvement • Shoulder Widening
• Guard Rail Update • Roadway Median Barrier • Signal Timing Optimization • Guardrails • Roadway Realignment • Speed Feedback Signs • High Friction Pavement • Retaining Walls • Increased Super elevation • Additional Turn Lanes
Each of the safety elements for the proposed improvements were converted to a total number of annual crash savings in the region based on the Caltrans’ Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) and Federal Highway Authority’s (FHWA) Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearing House guide. CMFs are based on before and after research of safety improvement implementations. They indicate the proportion of future crashes that may be prevented by implementing a given countermeasure, reducing the crash frequency for an intersection or roadway segment. In other words, a CMF is a multiplicative factor used to compute the expected number of crashes after implementing a given countermeasure at a specific site.

The CMF was applied to a crash forecast which was based on 5- years of historical crash data whi ch resulted in fatality or injury. The reduction in crashes was then then converted to annual crash saving based on Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) crash saving dollar amounts shown in Table 17.

448
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 27

Table 17: HSIP Crash Saving Dollar Amounts
Severity Crash Savings
(per crash)
Fatal $2,190,000
Serious $2,190,000
Moderate $142,300
Minor $80,900
Table 18 shows the overall annual crashes saving from traffic injuries that were potentially eliminated. Note that this analysis excludes property costs and as such should be conservative. Also note that the forecast only considers the effect of new traffic impacts and excludes the effect of existing conditions for the purposes of establishing Nexus.

Table 18: Future Safety Benefits with Project Improvements Safety Benefits Total Fatal Serious Moderate Minor
5-Years Reduction
in Crashes 153.0 2.5 14.1 45.3 91.0
1-Year Reduction
in Crashes 30.6 0.5 2.8 9.1 18.2
Value per Annum
(2019 Dollars) $10,048,590 $1,092,810 $6,192,599 $1,290,003 $1,473,178 As shown in Table 19, there is a direct cost benefit to the investments made for roadway safety improvements in the region. While it is difficult to estimate an absolute percentage in reduced peak hour delays, the expected reductions in crashes will also enhance system reliability and resilience.

4.3.4 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE I MPROVEMENTS
While projects may include pedestrian and/or bicycle improvements, out of the 38 projects, project C -11 Iron Horse Trail Improvements is the only project that predominantly focuses on pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Project C -11 consists of various improvements to the I ron Horse Trail within the TVTC boundaries including overcrossing construction, closing existing gaps , and adding safety improvements through the trail system. Pedestrian and bicycle improvement were evaluated based on NCHRP 552 Guidelines for Analysis of Investments in Bicycle Facilities. This approach relies on spatial analysis techniques to determine the likely number of new active transportation users resulting from the introduction of a new pedestrian/bicycle improvement. Table 19 shows the comparison between the Future 2040 Build and Future 2040 No-Build scenarios.

Table 19: Future Project Induced Daily Bicycle Demand
Total Induced Demand 2020 Base Year Future 2040
No- Build
Future 2040
Build
Adult Bicyclists 1,275 1,778 3,338
Child Bicyclists 731 1,038 2,077
Total Facility Users 2,006 2,817 5,415
449
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 28

As shown in Table 19, Project C-11 could add over 2,500 bicycle trips per day on the Iron Horse Trail by 2040 which will provide an alternative to congested vehicular travel as well as significant health and recreational value. Closing existing gaps in the trail will also encourage bicycle trips for other trip purposes beyond just commute trips, including school, commercial and recreational trips.

Project C-11 improvements will result in additional secondary operational and safety benefits. Currently many at-grade crossings are located at intersections with high vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes which are regularly disrupted by conflicting at-grade operations given required traffic signal phasing. These improvements will help improve vehicular traffic operations by relocating pedestrian and bicycle traffic away from vehicular traffic helping to offset the transportation impacts associated with future development. These improvements will also provide safety benefits by reducing the potential for vehicle- bicycle and vehicle- pedestrian conflicts. Using the same methodology described in the previous section, a separate safety analysis was conducted to quantify the safety benefits of all the C -11 project. Table 20 summarizes the safety benefit for Project C-11.

Table 20: Safety Benefits with Project C-11
Safety Benefits Total Fatal Serious Moderate Minor
Annual Reduction
in Crashes 7 2 1 4 0
Value per Annum
(2019 Dollars) $7,166,200 $4,380,000 $2,190,000 $596,200 -

4.3.5 INTERSECTION IMPROVE MENTS
There are two projects in List C with intersection improvements. Project C-4: Vasco Road & Dalton Avenue intersection Improvements, includes the addition of a traffic lane, signal optimization, and other improvements such as shoulder widening and roadway alignment to improve safety. Vasco Road is a major commute corridor connecting the City of Livermore and City of Brentwood. The intersection at Dalton Avenue provides access to the communities in the San Ramon Valley. With the planned and anticipated residential and industrial development along the corridor, this intersection is expected to have significant delays during the peak hours of commute.

Project C-8: Santa Rita and I-580 Interchange, will construct a second southbound left turn lane from Santa Rita onto Pimilico Drive. The City of Pleasanton General Plan has identified this intersection to have a reduced Level of Service under build out conditions.

4.3.6 TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS
There are two technology projects in List C. While Project C -10: Innovate 680 consist of multiple components including transit infrastructure and service improvements, roadway improvements, and technology enhancement, this project has been categorized as a technology improvement because TVTDF funding is being requested only for the Advance Technology component of the project. Other project components are expected to be funded through alternative sources. The Advance Technology component consist of implementing three technology-related strategies to improve operation along the I-680 corridor.

Strategies include providing an enhanced 511 mobile app and implementing a shared autonomous vehicles (SAV) program to shift travel away from single occupant vehicles by providing travelers with better information about mode choice opportunities, resultant travel time, cost per trip, and the availability of 450
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 29

transit. Other technology strategies include integrating adaptive ramp metering and/or corridor /incident management systems which can help improve the efficiency and safety of the transportation system.

Project C-15: Technology Enhancements proposes to provide connectivity for transit and vehicles between local arterials and regional facilities. The project is expected to be completed in three phases - Feasibility, Design, and Construction. The TVTDF will help fund t he feasibility study phase of the study, since the details of the design and construction phase are unknown at this time. The feasibility study will focus on the first and last mile connectivity opportunities at key transit hubs and along major transit routes in the Tri - Valley area. Leveraging existing and emerging technology, such as connected and autonomous vehicles, may help increase safety and mobility for all modes. These technologies may also help with increasing transit ridership or expanding transit service to less-served areas, especially for communities that currently lack service. Given that the resultant projects are intended to offset the impacts of future development, the feasibility study is appropriate to include in the TVTC project list.

4.4 BURDEN RELATIONSHIP
The need for the TVTDF is based on the forecasted increase in congestion on routes of regional significance as well as other transportation impacts resulting from new development. Consistent with the methodology from the 2008, the contribution by each land use was based on the proportion of average AM/PM trips generated by each land use. As demonstrated in this Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the planned projects and the types of development upon which the fee is imposed because the planned projects will mitigate the transportation impacts of said new development.

4.4.1 TRIP RATE
The 2008 Nexus Study used the 7th Edition of Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)’s Trip Generation Handbook to develop the trip rates for each land use category. Since then, three additional editions of the Trip Generation Handbook have been published for use, ending with the most recent 10 th Edition. It was determined that for all categories except the ‘Other’ category, the trip rates would be developed using the 10th Edition rather than the 7 th Edition for this update. In addition, consistent with the 2008 Nexus Study, the trip rates were developed based on adjacent street traffic rather than peak -hour of generator. A 30- percent reduction was also taken for retail trips to account for pass-by trips, consistent with the 2008 Nexus Study. Table 21 below summarizes the comparison in average AM and PM peak -hour trip rates by land use type. As shown in Table 21, every land use category results in a lower trip rate using the 10 th Edition when compared to the 7th Edition.

Table 21: AM/PM Peak-Hour Average Trip Rate Comparison Between 7th Edition and 10th Edition Land Use Type 7th Edition Average
Trip Rate
10th Edition Average
Trip Rate Difference
Single-Family Residential 0.90 0.87 -0.03
Multi-Family Residential 0.62 0.51 -0.11
Retail 1.67 1.66 -0.01
Office 1.53 1.16 -0.37
Industrial 0.89 0.67 -0.22
Other 1.00 1.00 0.00
451
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 30

4.4.2 TOTAL TRIPS BY LAND USE
The total number of trips generated by the growth in either dwelling units or square- feet for each land use category are shown in Table 22. As shown in Table 22, a total of 57,596 trip ends are generated by the land use growth between 2020 and 2040. The growth attributable to single-family residential units generates the largest number of trips, 13,716, or almost 25- percent of the total trips. The growth attributable to industrial employment or industrial buildings generates the fewest number of trips, 6,178, or just over 10- percent of the total trips.

Table 22: Total Trip Ends by Land Use Category
Land Use Type Growth
(HH or Sq. Ft) Trip Rate Forecast Trips
Single-Family Residential 15,857 0.87 13,716
Multi-Family Residential 17,456 0.51 8,903
Retail 5,117,500 1.66 8,508
Office 6,796,800 1.16 7,850
Industrial 9,289,800 0.67 6,178
Other 12,441,000 1.00 12,441

4.5 FEE ESTIMATION
As required by the Mitigation Fee Act, the following section outlines the methodology for calculating the proposed fee and demonstrates how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the proposed fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fees will be imposed.

The following steps were taken to determine the fee for each land use type:

1. Determine total unfunded cost.

2. Determine average AM/PM forecast peak-hour trips generated

3. Determine Fee per Land Use Category

4. Determine Maximum Fee

4.5.1 TOTAL UNFUNDED COST
The total investment for projects eligible to receive TVTDF funding is estimated to be $4. 470 billion, where $3.677 billion is unfunded. An additional reduction was applied to account for external “cut-though” trips on roadway congestion projects. Future development within the Tri-Valley area is not responsible to pay for these trips since these trips are caused by growth outside of the Tri-Valley area. This reduces the total unfunded cost to be covered by the maximum TVTDF to $2.928 billion. Note that this not change the overall project costs.

4.5.2 PEAK -HOUR TRIP FORECAST
Section 4.4.2. describes how the peak hour forecast was determined. Based on Table 22, a n average of 57,596 AM/PM peak hour trips are generated by the land use growth between 20 20 and 2040. 452
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 31

4.5.3 FEE PER LAND USE CAT EGORY
To determine the total project cost by category, each land use category’s share of the total trips generated by land use growth was multiplied by the total cost. An example calculation is shown below :

𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐹𝐹 𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆 = $𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋 𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆 × 13,716 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐹𝐹 𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅 57,596 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑇𝐹𝐹𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑇𝑅𝑅 = $𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋 𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆 The total cost by land use category is shown in Table 23. As shown in Table 23, the total cost ranges from $396.27 million for industrial uses to $879.78 million for single-family residential uses.

Table 23: Total Fee by Land Use Category
Land Use Type Forecast Trips*
Total Fee by Land
Use
(Millions)
Single-Family Residential 13,716 $697.31
Multi-Family Residential 8,903 $452.62
Retail 8,508 $432.54
Office 7,850 $399.09
Industrial 6,178 $314.08
Other 12,441 $632.49
* Average AM/PM trip

4.5.4 MAXIMUM FEE
To determine the maximum fee per dwelling unit, square- foot, or trip depending on the land use category, the total cost per category was divided by the total number of units, square-feet, or trips that occur between 2020 and 2040. An example calculation is shown below
𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐹𝐹 𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆 = $𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋 𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑀𝑀𝑆𝑆 15,857 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑈𝑈𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅 = $𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋𝑋 𝑝𝑝𝑆𝑆𝑝𝑝 𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 𝑢𝑢𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑅𝑅 The maximum fees are summarized in Table 24. As shown in Table 24, the maximum fee for a single- family residential unit is $43,397 while the maximum fee for one square-foot of retail use is $84.52.

Historically the TVTC has not applied the maximum fee schedule. For both the 1995 and 2008 nexus studies, the TVTC jurisdiction set rates at approximate one-third of the maximum fee calculated in the 1995 and 2008 Nexus studies to help foster growth within the Tri-Valley area, while providing a regional funding source that could be used to match and help compete for Federal and State transportation grants and funding programs.

453
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 32

Table 24: Total Cost and Maximum Fee by Land Use Category Land Use Type Growth Maximum Fee
Single-Family Residential 15,857 DU $43,976 per DU
Multi-Family Residential 17,456 DU $25,928 per DU
Retail 5,117,500 SF $84.52 per SF
Office 6,796,800 SF $58.72 per SF
Industrial 9,289,800 SF $33.81 per SF
Other 12,441 trips* $50,839 per trip*
Note: Reduction cost is only provided for comparison purposes and should not be seen as the preferred fees.* Average AM/PM trip 454
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 33

5 NEXT STEPS
This report documents the findings needed to adopt a fee schedule to fund the improvements projects elected to receive funding from the TVTDF. Below are next steps needed for the TVTC to adopt a fee schedule that is most appreciate for their needs.

5.1 ADJUST MENT TO MAXIMUM FEE CALCULATION
As previously discussed, the maximum fee would generate sufficient revenues to fund the total unfunded cost of all selected projects. However, if the TVTC adopts fee schedule below the maximum, this would result in revenue shortfall and TVTC would need to take one or both of the following actions:
• Increase funding from other sources
• Fund selected projects or project phases

5.1.1 INCREASE FUNDING FRO M OTHER SOURCES
TVTC could reduce the funding shortfall for specific projects by increasing funding form other federal, state, regional, and local fund sources. Some potential funding sources as listed below:
• Federal
o One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG)
• State
o State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
o Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)
o Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant
o Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• Regional
o Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) County Program Manager (CPM) Fund Local o Measure B & Measure BB
o Measure J
• Local
o Traffic Impact/Mitigation Fees
o Development Fees
o General Purpose Funds

5.1.2 FUND SELECTED PROJECTS OR PROJECT PHASES
TVTC could determine to fund the full amount for selected projects or fund certain phases of the project such as the planning or design phase of a project.

5.2 UPDATE STRATEGIC EXPENDITURE PLAN (SEP)
Once the final fee schedule has been adopted TVTC should update the SEP to set priority for which projects should be funded first.

455
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 34

APPENDIX
A – Existing TVTC Projects
B – Additional TVTC Projects
C – Project Improvement Category
456
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 35

APPENDIX A – EXISTING TVTC PROJECTS
A-1. I- 580/I -680 INT ERCHANGE (SOUTHBOUND TO EASTBOUND) TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project A-1 was located at the I-580 and I-680 interchange. The project constructed the southbound to eastbound flyover, northbound to eastbound direct connector, southbound on- and off- loop ramps, and a northbound on-ramp.

The project was needed to improve safety and reduce congestion on southbound and northbound I -680 near I-580, and mitigate the impacts of local and regional growth in housing and employment. This project was approved by the voters of Alameda County, as a portion of the Measure B sales tax program.

Status: This project has been completed.

A-2A. SR 84 EXPRESSW AY (I -580 TO I -680)
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore, City of Pleasanton Lead Agency: Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) Project Description : Project A -2a is located along SR 84 between I -580 and I -680 in Livermore and Pleasanton. The project will widen and reconstruct SR 84 to expressway standards. The ultimate configuration is expected to consist of six lanes from I-580 to Stanley Boulevard and four lanes from Stanley Boulevard to I-680.

The project has been segmented into five primary sections:
• Segment 1 (I-580 to Jack London Boulevard) – widening and Phase I of the I-580/SR 84 Interchange project (Project A-2b).
• Segment 2 (Jack London Boulevard to a point roughly halfway between Concannon Boulevard and Stanley Boulevard) – widening existing configuration from two lanes to four lanes and from four lanes to six lanes.
• Segment 3 (Halfway between Concannon Boulevard and Stanley Boulevard to Ruby Hill Drive) – widening from two lanes to four lanes.
• Segment 4 (Ruby Hill Drive to Pigeon Pass) – straightening the roadway alignments and adding truck climbing lanes.
• Segment 5 (Pigeon Pass to I-680) – widening the roadway from two lanes to four lanes and improvements at the SR 84/I-680 interchange.

Status: Below is the status of the project.
• Final design and right-of-way acquisition was completed in September 2020. • Construction began in May 2021.
• Completion of construction is anticipated in spring 2024. 457
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 36

Cost Estimate and Funding Sources
Segment 3:

Cost (Millions) $105.40
Funding (Millions)
Measure B $34.87
Measure BB $10.00
State $47.03
Local (CMA-TIP) $2.00
Local (City) $1.50
TVTDF $10.00
Total Funding (Millions) $105.40
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.00
Segment 5:

Cost (Millions) $244.10
Funding (Millions)
Measure B $1.05
Measure BB $123.40
State (SB 1 LPP) $8.60
Regional Improvement Program (RIP) $11.11
Regional Measure 3 (RM 3) $85.00
TVTDF $14.94
Total Funding (Millions) $244.10
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.00
A-2B. SR 84/I -580 IN TERCHANGE
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore
Lead Agency: Caltrans and City of Livermore
Project Description: Project A-2b is located in Livermore, at the intersection of I-580 and Isabel Avenue including Portal Avenue.

The project consists of two phases:
• Phase 1 – The Isabel Avenue Interchange project which included replacing the I -580/Portola Avenue interchange with the I -580/Isabel Avenue- SR 84 interchange. Phase I also included realignment of Isabel Avenue and the realignment and extension of Portola Avenue from East Airway Boulevard to Isabel Avenue.
• Phase 2 – The ultimate improvements at the I-580/Isabel Avenue-SR 84 Interchange are to provide six lanes over I-580 at the Isabel Avenue-SR 84 Interchange and four lanes over I-580 at the Portola Avenue overcrossing.

Status: A programmatic environmental assessment and right-of-way acquisition is complete. 458
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 37

• Phase 1 – Construction of Phase I of the project was completed in March 2012. • Phase 2 – Conceptual design is approved. Project development activities are anticipated to begin in 2023.

Cost Estimate and Funding Sources
Phase 2:

A-3. I- 680 AUXILIARY LANES (SEGMENT 2)
TVTC Project Sponsor: Town of Danville
Lead Agency: Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Project Description: Project A-3 was located along I -680 in Danville and constructed auxiliary lanes in both directions between Crow Canyon Road in San Ramon and Sycamore Valley Road in Danville. The project was the last segment of auxiliary lanes in both directions of I-680 between Bollinger Canyon Road in San Ramon and Diablo Road in Danville.

Status: This project has been completed.

A-4. WEST DUBLIN/PLE ASANTON BART STATION
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Dublin, City of Pleasanton Lead Agency: BART
Project Description: Project A -4 was located in Dublin and Pleasanton and constructed the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and related transit improvements. The project was a joint public and private venture to build a station on the active BART line in the median of I -580. The related transit improvements were located on both the north (Dublin) and south (Pleasanton) sides of the freeway on property owned by BART and included patron parking garages, passenger pick -up and drop-offs, and bus drop-offs.

Status: This project has been completed.

Cost (Millions) $22.00
Funding (Millions)
Livermore Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) $16.28
TVTDF $5.15
Total Funding (Millions) $21.43
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.57
459
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 38

A-5A. I- 580 EASTBOUN D AUXILIARY LANE
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton
Lead Agency: Alameda CTC
Project Description: Project A-5a was located along eastbound I-580 from Hacienda Drive in Pleasanton and Greenvi lle Road in Livermore. The project constructed eastbound auxiliary lanes between Isabel Avenue and North Livermore Avenue and between North Livermore Avenue and First Street in Livermore.

In addition, the project included widening two eastbound bridges at Arroyo-Los Positas Road and adding final asphalt concrete pavement across all lanes in the eastbound direction from Hacienda Drive to Greenville Road.

Status: This project has been completed.

A-5B. I- 580 HOV LANE WESTBOUND
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton
Lead Agency: Alameda CTC
Project Description: Project A-5b was located along westbound I-580 from Greenville Road in Livermore to Foothill Road overcrossing in Dublin and Pleasanton. The project constructed westbound HOV lanes and rehabilitated existing pavement.

The project increased capacity, safety, and efficiency for commuters and freight along the primary trade corridor connecting the Bay Area with the Central Valley.

The project was completed in two segments:
• East Segment – Greenville Road overcrossing to Isabel Avenue in Livermore • West Segment – Isabel Avenue to Foothill Road overcrossing Status: This project has been completed.

A-6. I- 680 HOV LANES , SR 84 TO TOP OF SU NOL GRADE
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton
Lead Agency: Caltrans and Alameda CTC
Project Description: Project A- 6 was located along southbound I -680 between SR-84 and the top of the Sunol Grade. The project constructed HOV lanes along approximately a 3.5-mile segment of I-680.

Status: This project has been completed.

460
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 39

A-7. I- 580/FOOTHILL ROAD/SAN RAMON ROAD INTERCHANGE

MODIFICATIONS
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project A-7 was located at the intersection of the I -580 ramps and Foothill Road in Pleasanton. The project constructed improvements to improve intersection operations and safety. The project modified the intersection to remove the direct eastbound to southbound connection and eastbound to northbound loop connection so that it terminates into a “T” style signalized intersection at Foothill Road just south of the Foothill Road Bridge.

Status: This project has been completed.

A-8. I- 680/ALCOSTA B OULEVARD INTERCHANGE
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of San Ramon
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project A- 8 was located at the I -680/Alcosta Boulevard interchange in San Ramon.

The project reconstructed the southbound off-ramp and added a new on-ramp to improve operations at the interchange. This project closed the southbound off-ramp and built new on- and off-ramps north of Alcosta Boulevard.

Status: This project has been completed.

A-9A. CROW CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Lead Agency: Alameda County
Project Description: Project A -9a is located along Crow Canyon Road between E. Castro Valley Boulevard and the Alameda/Contra Costa County line.

Project A-9a is Phase 1 of a two-phase safety improvement project along Crow Canyon Road. Please refer to Project A-9b for details on Phase 2.

Phase 1 safety improvements include speed feedback signs, shoulder widening, California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement areas, and guard rail modifications.

Overall, the short -term safety improvements will facilitate traffic safety and operations, while reducing congestion for residents traveling between Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Status: The project is currently in the Preliminary Engineering/Environmental Studies stage. Construction of Phase 1 is to be determined.

461
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 40

Cost and Funding Source

Cost (Millions) $18.87
Funding (Millions)
CMA TIP $0.45
Local Alameda County $0.45
TVTDF $1.55
Total Funding (Millions) $2.45
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $8.42
A-9B. CROW CANYON RO AD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Lead Agency: Alameda County
Project Description: Project A -9b is located along Crow Canyon Road between E. Castro Valley Boulevard and the Alameda/Contra Costa County Line.

Project A-9b is Phase 2 of the two- phase safety improvement project along Crow Canyon Road. Please refer to Project A-9a for details on Phase 1.

Phase 2 safety improvements include roadway realignment, shoulder widening, roundabouts, two- way left turn lanes (as needed), and tunnels at post mile (PM) 2.15.

This project will increase safety for motorists traveling along this major arterial roadway between Castro Valley in Alameda County and San Ramon in Contra Costa County. The realignment of various curves, shoulder widening, and tunnels at PM 2.15 will facilitate improved traffic operations and reduce congestion for residents traveling between Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Status: This project is in the scoping stage. Construction is expected to begin after completion of Phase 1 (Project A-9a). Phasing and schedule have not yet been determined.

Cost and Funding Source

Cost (Millions) $58.77
Funding (Millions)
TVTDF $1.69
Total Funding (Millions) $1.69
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions, 2015) $57.08
A-10A. VASCO ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PH ASE 1
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Lead Agency: Alameda County
462
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 41

Project Description: Project A-10a is located along Vasco Road in Alameda County.

Project A-10a is Phase 1 of the Vasco Road Safety Improvements, a two-phase safety improvement project along Vasco Road. The project includes roadway realignment, shoulder wi dening, and installment of median barriers along Vasco Road. Please refer to Project A-10b for details on Phase 2.

Roadway realignments have been completed and consisted of straightening the alignment of Vasco Road at about 1.8- miles north of the Livermore city limits to the Alameda/Contra Costa county line. A median barrier has been installed between the Contra Costa County line and about 1.8-miles north of the Livermore city limits. The installation of median barriers eliminates crossover -type collisions that resulted in fatalities in the past. The realignment of tight curves facilitates Tri Delta bus services between Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

The remaining components of Phase 1 includes sub-standard shoulder modifications.

Status: The utility re location phase of this project has been completed. Construction of the realignment project was completed in November 2009. Installation of the median barriers was also completed. The Vasco Road Safety Improvement Project is scheduled to be constructed in t wo stages. Shoulder improvements for Phase 1 are expected to be completed by 2020.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $40.57
Funding (Millions)
Measure B $1.50
STIP $4.60
TCRP $6.50
Local Alameda County $2.81
STP/CMAQ $3.90
Prop 1-B $6.00
Fed demo $0.80
TVTDF $3.32
Total Funding (Millions) $29.43
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions, 2015) $11.14
A-10B. VASCO ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PH ASE 2
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Lead Agency: Alameda County
Project Description: Project A-10b is located along Vasco Road in Alameda County. Project A-10b is Phase 2 of the Vasco Road Safety Improvements, a two- phase safety improvement project along Vasco Road. Please refer to Project A-10a for details on Phase 1.

Phase 2 includes roadway realignment, shoulder widening, and installation of median barriers. This phase of the project will install median barriers along Vasco Road within Alameda County on portions of the roadway not covered by Phase 1. In addition, this phase will include shoulder widening and curve modifications, as needed. Phase 2 of Vasco Road will provide continuous median barrier protection 463
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 42

between Contra Costa County and the City of Livermore. The installation of median barriers will eliminate crossover-type collisions that resulted in fatalities in the past.

Status: The Phase 2 project is in the scoping stage. The Phase 2 project includes the PSR to be done by Alameda County.

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $31.20
Funding (Millions)
TVTDF $2.58
Total Funding (Millions) $2.58
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions, 2015) $28.62
A-11. EXPRESS BUS/BU S RAPID TRANSIT (BRT ) – PHASE 2
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Dublin
Lead Agency: Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) Project Description: Project A-11 is Phase 2 of the Express Bus/BRT, which consists of two phases. The express bus route associated with Phase 1 of the project has been operating since January 2011.

Phase 2 includes upgrades to and expansion of the initial Rapid Project, as w ell as some project refinements, updates, and maintenance/replacement of original project elements and equipment based on evaluation of the existing components and conditions at the time of funding. The transit system priorities include the following elements:
• A technologically advanced transit system
• A multi-modal transportation system that supports the local economy • Prioritized regional transfers and connections
• Reliability and efficiency that maximizes value to taxpayers and the community Phase 2 will consist of five key potential elements (based upon conditions at time of funding):

1. Advanced Technology – Design and installation of advanced technologies and road features allowing rapid transit to operate quickly and efficiently, and help to mitigate delay in dwell times, boardings, and travel times. Some of the advanced technologies and road features that LAVTA is considering for Phase 2 are: transit signal priority (TSP), enhanced stations, queue jumps, environmentally friendly coaches and advanced onboard technology, advanced fare collection systems, level boarding, dedicated travel lanes, and better integrated park and ride facilities and transit centers. Element 1 is currently budgeted at $2 Million.

2. North/South Express Bus/Rapid Service – In keeping with the Alameda Countywide Transit Plan, and in order to provide a strong foundation for LAVTA’s Sys tem, I-680 service expansion, North/South Express Bus/BRT service, and other Express/Rapid service options, will be explored and considered. Element 2 is currently budgeted at $6.5 Million.

3. Dublin Extension – Continued study and planning will be done on ho w best to integrate the planned extension of Dublin Boulevard and the planned Livermore BART Extension into LAVTA’s Express Bus/BRT service. Element 3 is currently budgeted at $6.5 Million. 464
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 43

4. Pleasanton Alignment – Complete “Rapidization,” of the Livermore to Pleasanton alignment will be evaluated, with advanced technology and improved service elements planned for the south side of I-580, and possible connection to the existing Rapid service. Element 4 is currently budgeted at $1.5 Million.

5. Park and Ride Lots – In working with local cities and Alameda County, LAVTA will consider improved park and ride elements to support bus, biking, and walking access in the Tri -Valley, and to improve the accessibility of transportation alternatives that would ease congestion on I -580.

These options might include: construction of new lots, smart signage, improved bicycle storage, increased pedestrian accessibility and safety, enhanced multi -modal elements on coaches, and increased or revised bus service to rail stations and regional transit connections. Element 5 is currently budgeted at $2 Million.

Status: Phase 1 is fully completed and operational, as of January 2011. Phase 2 is in the research, design, and planning stage. In August 2016, LAVTA realigned the Express Bus/BRT R oute (Route 30R) to serve Las Positas College, and transformed existing Route 10 into an Express Bus/BRT (Route 10R) operating through Pleasanton to BART. The transformation of Route 10 into Route 10R was the first step in implementation of the Phase 2 Pleasanton Alignment. LAVTA intends to implement additional items from Phase 2 (Advanced Technology) to both Routes 10R and 30R in 2017, which includes upgrading the traffic signal priority onboard the buses and at key intersections along both Rapid routes. Costs for Phase 2 have been updated to reflect current pricing for the project elements listed above. Phase 2 Scope of work, schedule, and full funding parameters are not known at this time.

Cost and Funding Sources
Phase 2:

Cost (Millions) $22.35
Funding (Millions)
TVTDF $1.14
Total Funding (Millions) $1.14
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $21.21
B-1. I- 580/I -680 INT ERCHANGE (WESTBOUND TO SOUTHBOUND) TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Dublin
Lead Agency: Alameda CTC
Project Description: Project B-1 is located at the I -580/I-680 Interchange in Alameda County. The proposed project limits are from 1,700 feet east of the Hacienda Drive Overcrossing to 2,000 feet west of the San Ramon Road Overcrossing along I -580, and from the Amador Valley Boulevard Undercrossing to 3,400 feet south of the Stoneridge Drive Overcrossing along I-680.

Status: A Project Study Report -Project Development Support (PSR -PDS) was completed and approved by Caltrans in 2009.

The next steps in project development will be to:
• Review the existing PSR-PDS to validate the information 465
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 44

• Identify the need for updates/revisions to identify financially feasible improvements to address the latest safety, operational, and congestion issues
The Alameda CTC’s 2014 Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP), approved as part of Measure BB, includes $20 Million in funding for I-580/I-680 Interchange improvements. Further project development is being explored. Alameda CTC is working with local, regional, and state agencies in identifying funding.

The Alameda CTC’s 2020 Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) split this project into two phases. Phase 1 is part of the County’s 10-year priory project list, while Phase 2 is listed under 30-Year project list.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions, 2015) $1,785.65
Funding (Millions, 2015)
Measure BB $20.00
TVTDF $1.00
Total Funding (Millions, 2015) $21.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions, 2015) $1,764.65
B-2. FIFTH EASTBOUND LANE ON I -580 (SANT A RITA ROAD TO VASCO ROAD)
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton, City of Livermore Lead Agency: Alameda CTC
Project Description: Project B-2 is located along eastbound I -580 between Santa Rita Road and Vasco Road. The project would construct a fifth eastbound mixed flow lane and would eliminate the lane drop at Santa Rita Road.

Status: This project has been completed.

B-3. I- 580/FIRST STR EET INTERCHANGE MODI FICATION
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project B-3 is located at the I-580/First Street interchange in Livermore. The project would modify the interchange by widening the overcrossing to six lanes and reconstructing the ramps to achieve a partial cloverleaf interchange design.

Status: A PSR has been completed. The project schedule and phasing are not available at this time.

466
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 45

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $61.00
Funding (Millions)
Livermore TIF $53.07
Total Funding (Millions) $53.07
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $7.93
B-4. I- 580/VASCO ROA D INTERCHANGE MODIFI CATION
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project B-4 is located at the I-580/Vasco Road interchange in Livermore. The project would modify the interchange by widening the overcrossing to eight lanes and reconstructing the ramps to achieve a modified partial cloverleaf interchange design.

Status: A PSR and programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for right-of-way protection has been completed. Right -of-way acquisition is underway. Environmental assessment, project development activities, and design are anticipated to begin in 2018.

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $85.65
Funding (Millions)
Livermore TIF $67.66
Measure BB $1.38
TVTDF $6.80
Total Funding (Millions) $75.84
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $9.81
B-5. I- 580/GREENVILLE ROAD INTERCHANGE M ODIFICATION
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore
Lead Agency: Caltrans
Project Description: Project B-5 is located at the I -580/Greenville Road interchange in Livermore. The project would modify the interchange by widening the undercrossing to six lanes and reconstructing the ramps to achieve a modified partial cloverleaf interchange design. The project would also construct segments of auxiliary lanes in the vicinity of the interchange.

Status: A PSR and programmatic EIR for right -of-way protection has been completed. Right -of-way acquisition is underway. The project phasing and schedule is unavailable.

467
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 46

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $86.00
Funding (Millions)
Livermore TIF $67.08
Total Funding (Millions) $67.08
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $18.92
B-6. JACK LONDON BOULEVARD EXTENSION
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Livermore
Lead Agency: City of Livermore
Project Description: Project B-6 is located along Jack London Boulevard in Livermore. The project would widen Jack London Boulevard to El Charro Road as a four-lane arterial roadway.

The project will be constructed in two phases.
• Phase 1 - two lane extension
• Phase 2 – relocate a portion of the roadway south of the Livermore Airport to its ultimate alignment
Status: An EIR, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of the two-lane extension (Phase 1) has been completed.

The project is expected to be constructed in two phases. • Phase 1 – Completed 2009.
• Phase 2 - Will not commence until after the quarries have completed mining operations.

Cost and Funding Sources
Phase 2:

Cost (Millions) $28.16
Funding (Millions)
Livermore TIF $18.08
Total Funding (Millions) $18.08
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $10.08
B-7. EL CHARRO ROAD EXTENSION (STONERIDG E DRIVE/JACK LONDON

BOULEVARD TO STANLEY BOULEVARD)
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of Pleasanton
Lead Agency: City of Pleasanton
468
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 47

Project Description: Project B-7 is located along El Charro Road in Pleasanton. The project would extend El Charro Road south from its current terminus at Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard to connect with Stanley Boulevard. Currently, this section of El Charro Road is a private roadway, but the El Charro extension will be open for public use.

The El Charro Road Extension project consists of two phases. • Phase 1 – between I-580 and Stoneridge Drive-Jack London Boulevard • Phase 2 – between Stoneridge Drive-Jack London Boulevard and Stanley Boulevard, approximately 1.7 miles
Status: Phase 1 was completed and open for public use in 2012 with the construction of the Livermore Outlets. Phase 2 is dependent on the status/development of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan. This plan will identify the land use and circulation along the future El Charro Road and will identify a timeline for opening of this roadway for public use. It is anticipated that the project w ill be constructed with the first stages of the East Side Specific Plan development. The City of Pleasanton began the East Pleasanton Specific Plan in 2013 and the Pleasanton City Council, in 2015, determined that the completion of the Plan would occur at a later date and the Plan adoption was placed on hold.

The project is expected to be constructed in several stages. • Phase 1 – Completed and opened to traffic in 2012.
• Phase 2 – Schedule is undetermined at this time.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $72.48
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $72.48
B-8. CAMINO TASSAJAR A/TASSAJARA ROAD WID ENING PROJECT (EAST

OF BLACKHAWK DRIVE T O NORTH DUBLIN RANCH DRIVE)
TVTC Project Sponsor: Contra Costa County, City of Dublin Lead Agency: Contra Costa County, City of Dublin
Project Description: Project B-8 is located along Camino Tassajara-Tassajara Road. This project consists of two project phases:

Safety Improvement Project – Blackhawk Drive in Contra Costa County to Moller Ranch (Palisades Drive) in the City of Dublin
• The safety improvement project will widen Camino Tassajara from two to four lanes from East of Blackhawk Drive to Moller Ranch (Palisades Drive) in the City of Dublin. The project may also include realignment of various horizontal curves along the roadway. Interim improvements may include roadway widening to meet two- lane rural road standards with sufficient lane width and 469
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 48

shoulder width to improve safety and allow for future bike lanes. The project will improve safety for motorists and create bicycle facilities consistent with the Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The ultimate improvements will increase capacity along Camino Tassajara to help mitigate the impacts of local and regional growth in housing and employment within the Tri-Valley.

Roadway Widening Project – Windemere Parkway to County Line (Contra Costa County) and Quarry Lane School/Wallis Ranch Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive (City of Dublin) • The roadway widening project consist of two segments:
o Segment A – Windemere Parkway to County line
 Segment A will widen and realign Camino Tassajara from two to four lanes. The horizontal curves at the Contra Costa/Alameda County Line will be realigned to increase safety along the roadway. Roadway shoulders will be widened to create bicycle facilities consistent with the Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The ultimate improvements will increase capacity along Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road to help mitigate the impacts of local and regional growth in housing and employment within the Tri-Valley.
o Segment B – Quarry Lane School/ Wallis Ranch Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive  Segment B will widen Tassajara Road from two to four lanes and will improve safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians, by providing sidewalks, bike lanes, and widening from two to four lanes. Roadway improvements will be consistent with the City of Dublin Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The ultimate improvements will increase capacity along Tassajara Road to help mitigate the impacts of local and regional growth in housing and employment within the Tri - Valley.

The segment of Tassajara Road from the County line to North Dublin Ranch Drive in the City of Dublin is a RRS and was modeled in the 2008 Nexus Study. However, the segment was not included in previous TVTDF funding plans to receive funding. By identifying this segment of the project in the project description, this will enable the City of Dublin to utilize various revenue sources, including the 20% TVTDF return- to- source funds on this segment. This will not impact the projected revenue allocation or resulting benefit of the 2008 Nexus Study.

Status:

Safety Improvement Project: The PSR for the project has been completed. The City of Dublin and Contra Costa County are coordinating on various aspects of the Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road safety improvements near the Contra Costa/Alameda County line. Contra Costa County and the City of Dublin are beginning design of Phase 1 improvements of the safety project limits from Windermere Parkway to Moller Ranch (Palisades Drive).

Roadway Widening Project: The PSR for the project has been completed. The City of Dubl in and Contra Costa County are coordinating on various aspects of the Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road widening phase. Contra Costa County and the City of Dublin are conducting initial preliminary engineering for the Segment A and B roadway widening project within their respective jurisdictions.

470
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 49

Cost and Funding Sources
Safety Improvement Project
Contra Costa County:

Cost (Millions) $20.54
Funding (Millions)
Contra Costa Traffic Mitigation Fees $4.25
TVTDF $3.70*
Total Funding (Millions) $7.95
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $12.59
City of Dublin:

Cost (Millions) $34.55
Funding (Millions, 2015)
Dublin EDTIF $2.49
Dublin Dougherty Valley Contributions $0.50
TVTD (City of Dublin 20% Local Funding) $1.00
TVTDF $0.00*
Total Funding (Millions) $3.99
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $30.56
*The City of Dublin and Contra Costa to share $2.0 Million from the 2017 SEP Update for project segment between Windermere Parkway and Moller Ranch (Palisades Drive). Remaining $1.70 Million to be used in Contra Costa County.

Roadway Widening Project
Segment A: County
Cost (Millions) $17.65
Funding (Millions)
Contra Costa Traffic Mitigation Fees $14.48
TVTDF $2.68**
Total Funding (Millions) $17.16
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions, 2021) $0.49

Segment B: City of Dublin
Cost (Millions) $15.34
Funding (Millions)
Dublin Transportation Improvement Fee (TIF)
Program
$1.00
Dublin Dougherty Valley Contributions $1.63
TVTD (City of Dublin 20% Local Funding) $1.80
Total Funding (Millions) $4.43
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $10.91
**$2.68 Million to be used in Contra Costa County.
471
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 50

B-10. I-680 SOUTHBOUND HOV LANE GAP CLOSURE (N ORTH MAIN STREET

TO RUDGEAR ROAD)
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of San Ramon
Lead Agency: CCTA
Lead Agency: Project B-10 is located along southbound I -680 between North Main Street and Rudgear Road. The project would close the HOV lane gap along this segment of I -680 and provide a continuous HOV lane from the Benicia-Martinez Bridge to the Contra Costa/Alameda County line.

The project is necessary to encourage carpooling, vanpooling, and transit; while providing the necessary infrastructure for express buses in the corridor. When completed, the HOV lane is planned to be converted to an Express Lane as part of the I-680 Express Lanes Project.

Status: This project has been completed.

Cost and Funding Sources

B-11A. I -680 HOV DIR ECT ACCESS RAMPS
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of San Ramon
Lead Agency: CCTA
Project Description: Project B -11a is located along I -680 in San Ramon. The projec t would construct dedicated HOV on- and off-ramps in the median of I-680, in both the northbound and southbound directions at Norris Canyon Road or at Executive Parkway in San Ramon. The project received a high level of community interest, with a number of local residents voicing strong oppositions about the direct HOV ramps at Norris Canyon. An alternative location for the direct ramps is also being evaluated at Executive Parkway.

Status: March 2016, a letter from the City of San Ramon to CCTA was submitt ed and stated that the City of San Ramon withdrew support for the project. Subsequently, the CCTA has suspended work on the project. The project has been removed from the project list and is no longer considered for funding.

Cost (Millions) $98.70
Funding (Millions)
RM2 $14.1
Measure J $30.4
STIP/RP $15.6
BAIFA $15.1
TVTDF $6.49
Total Funding (Millions) $81.69
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $17.01
472
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 51

B-11B. I -680 TRANSIT CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
TVTC Project Sponsor: City of San Ramon
Lead Agency: CCTA
Other Involved Parties: Caltrans, Southwest Area Transportation (SWAT) Committee, Transportation Partnership and Cooperation (TRANSPAC)
Project Description: Project B.11b is located along I-680 in San Ramon Valley. The project would fund a corridor express lane and operational improvement s to facilitate carpools , vanpools and increase transit use in the corridor as an alternative to single occupant vehicle travel. Funding may also be us ed to implement high capacity transit improvements along I-680. These improvements may include an express lane, relevant transit projects, advanced traffic management programs, and/or autonomous or connected vehicles.

Status: A Project Study “I-680 Transit Investment Congestion Relief Study” was completed in 2015 with Measure J funds. Specific details for this project will be further developed when additional funding is identified. Phasing and schedule are unavailable at this time.

Cost Estimate and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $277.85
Funding (Millions)
Measure J $1.00
TVTDF $2.00
Total Funding (Millions) $3.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $274.85

473
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 52

APPENDIX B – ADDITIONAL TVTC PROJECTS
C-1 TESLA ROAD SAFET Y IMPROVEMENT
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County
Project Description: This project along Tesla Road from Greenville Road to South Livermore Avenue in rural Unincorporated Alameda County includes shoulder widening, turn lanes to access wineries and residences, pavement rehabilitation, and utilities undergrounding. This safety improvements project will address rear end type collisions, improve access to wineries, and improve goods movements as well as commute traffic issues. Proposed improvements will reduce queues along this congested rural roadway connecting Unincorporated areas of Alameda County to City of Livermore.

Status: This project is in the scoping phase and is expected to be completed by 2024.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $13.19
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $13.19
C- 2 NORRIS CANYON ROAD S AFETY IMPROVEMENT PR OJECT
TVTC Project Sponsors: Contra Costa County, Department of Public Works & Alameda County, Department of Public Works
Project Description: The proposed project for Norris Canyon Road includes countermeasures that will increase safety on a regional route that connects San Ramon to Alameda County. The proposed project includes the following road segments:
• Segment 1 (Norris Canyon Road from San Ramon City Limits to 300 feet west of Ashbourne Drive) – this segment has experienced an increase in run off the road collisions and is slated for countermeasures such as guardrails and other safety countermeasures. • Segment 2 (Norris Canyon Road from 300 feet west of Ashbourne Drive to Alameda County limits) – this segment currently has a 20’ pavement width and no road shoulders. This segment has also experienced an increase in run off the road collisions. Countermeasures include shoulder widening, installation of a retaining wall, and installation of a guardrail. • Segment 3 (Norris Canyon Road from the Alameda County limit line to Crow Canyon Road) – the narrow rural road continues west into Alameda County where the road pavement continues to be narrow with approximately 20’ existing pavement width and no road shoulders. The proposed project would include shoulder widening and guardrail installation to reduce serious injury collisions.

For each phase of this project, there will be a project scope and cost estimate, environmental documentation, preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E), Right of Way Acquisition, Construction, and Construction Inspection.

Status: The Project is in the preliminary engineering phase for Segments 1 and 2 as other funding is sought in order to continue planning studies and further design efforts. 474
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 53

Cost and Funding Sources:

Contra Costa County (Segment 1 & 2):

Cost (Millions) $8.00**
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $8.00
**Segment 1: $2 million, Segment 2: $6 million

Alameda County (Segment 3):

Cost (Millions) $16.49
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $16.49
C- 3 DUBLIN BOULEVARD – NORTH CANYONS PARKW AY EXTENSION TVTC Project Sponsor: Dublin and Livermore
Project Description: This project will construct the street extension to connect Dublin Blvd at Fallon Road in Dublin with North Canyons Parkway in Livermore at Doolan Road. The preliminary phase (currently underway) of this planned project will update the project by incorporating multimodal travel, and the current State, regional, and local priorities.

Dublin Boulevard - North Canyons Parkway Extension project would extend Dublin Boulevard in Dublin at its current terminus at Fallon Road to North Canyons Parkway in Livermore. The new extended street is planned to have 4 to 6 travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, curb and gutter, traffic signals/roundabouts, a raised median, bus stops, and all street utilities. This project will consider the provision of dedicated transit lanes in addition to the mixed flow travel lanes for higher level of transit service with 10 to 20- minute headways during appropriate peak demand periods. This project will also require enhanced multimodal connectivity to various land uses along its stretch and at its terminus, including connectivity to 5 PDAs.

While addressing Sustainable Communities Strategies, circulation inside and outside the PDAs will be incorporated as part of the design. This project is currently in Preliminary Design Phase (funded by local monies) including the environmental analysis for the project. It will require design and construction funding.

Status: Environmental phase is complete. Currently in design phase. Anticipated to complete design in 2023. Subsequent milestones are TBD.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $160.39
Funding (Millions)
Measure BB $7.75
Federal $0.54
Local $17.20
Total Funding (Millions) $25.49
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $134.91
475
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 54

C-4 VASCO ROAD AT DA LTON AVENUE INTERSEC TION IMPROVEMENTS TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda County/City of Livermore
Project Description: The project along Vasco Road at Dalton Avenue includes the addition of a traffic lane, traffic signal modification, shoulder widening, and utility adjustments as needed.

This project is a continuation of the safety improvements project along Vasco Road that included a roadway realignment and other safety improvements north of the Livermore city limits to the Alameda/Contra Costa county line.

Status: This project is in the scoping phase and is expected to be completed by 2023.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $3.39
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $3.39
C-5 EL CHARRO ROAD W IDENING
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton
Project Description: Construct 1.7 miles of 4- lane divided road with Class I and Class IV bike facilities, including a bridge over the Arroyo Mocho and a grade separation.

Status: This project has not been started.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $68.09
Funding (Millions)
Pleasanton TIF $30.00
Total Funding (Millions) $30.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $38.09

476
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 55

C-6 SUNOL/680 INTERC HANGE IMPROVEMENTS
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton
Project Description: T his project will fund the design of the I -680 at Sunol Boulevard interchange improvement. This will include a Project Study Report (PSR) to establish a project scope and cost estimate, environmental documentation, and the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E).

Status: Currently in PSR-PDS, PA&ED Phase anticipated Spring/Summer 2019 Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $16.60
Funding (Millions)
Pleasanton TIF $2.00
Total Funding (Millions) $2.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $14.60
C-7 I-680 EXPRESS LANES – HWY 84 TO ALCO STA
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton/ACTC
Project Description: This project will close the gap between existing and in- progress high- occupancy vehicle (HOV)/express lane projects to the north and south. The project extends for approximately nine miles on northbound I-680 through Sunol, Pleasanton, Dublin, and San Ramon.

Status: Design and construction of this project is being rolled out in two phases—southbound (Phase 1) and northbound (Phase 2). Environmental and preliminary engineering studies are complete. Phase 1 final design work was initiated in February 2020 and construction for Phase 1 is ant icipated to start in 2022.

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $527.57
Funding (Millions)
Measures BB $20.00
Total Funding (Millions) $20.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $507.57
C-8 SANTA RITA/I -580 INTERCHANGE
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton
Project Description: This project will construct a 2nd southbound left turn lane from Santa Rita onto Pimilico Drive. The left turn vehicle queue length exceeds the length of the left turn pocket and blocks the #1 southbound lane, thus reducing the Level of Service.

Status: This project has not been started.
477
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 56

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $10.33
Funding (Millions)
Pleasanton TIF $7.70
Total Funding (Millions) $7.70
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $2.63
C-9 STONERIDGE/I- 680 INTERCHANGE
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton
Project Description: This project will make modifications to the Stoneridge Drive Interchange to allow four westbound through lanes. This project will modify the northbound I -680 on ramp by one lane to provide two northbound ramp lanes. The widening will include the widening of the bridge structure as well as widening on Stoneridge Drive and safety improvements on the pedestrian and bicycle crossing.

Status: PS&E
Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $11.98
Funding (Millions)
2014 MBB (TEPO – 26) from Alameda
CTC
$5.20
Developer $2.70
Total Funding (Millions) $7.70
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $2.63

C-10 INNOVATE 680
TVTC Project Sponsor: CCTA/Danville/San Ramon/CCC
Project Description: Implement the following strategies in the I-680 corridor:

Strategy No. 1: Complete HOV/Express Lanes
Eliminate the gap in existing carpool lanes in the NB direction and convert to an express lane to increase efficiency.

Strategy No. 2: Cool Corridor “Hot Spots”
Improve congestion “hot spots” caused by high-volume weaving areas around N. Main Street, Lawrence Way, Treat Blvd, and other locations south of SR 24 (Livorna Road, etc.). This strategy will be completed with Strategy 1 since they are interdependent.

Strategy No. 3: Increase Efficiency of Bus Service
Increase bus service efficiency by improving express bus service, implementing bus operations on shoulder (BOS), and increasing technology-based intermodal transit centers/managed park and ride lots.

Strategy No. 4: Enhance TDM Strategies
478
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 57

Provide enhanced 511 mobile app providing options to make informed decisions about mode choice, travel time, and cost per trip.

Strategy No. 5: Provide First Mile/Last Mile Connections Implement Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs) to improve transit connectivity and to shift travelers from Single Occupant Vehicles (SOVs).

Strategy No. 6: Innovative Operational Strategies
Deploy a suite of technology-based solutions to maximize the efficiency of the roadway system integrating adaptive ramp metering, integrated corridor management, incident management, and decision support systems.

Strategy No. 7: Prepare Corridor for the Future
Prepare corridor to accommodate the evolution of CV applications and AV technologies for improved traffic flow by building new and upgraded vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communications.

TVTDF would go towards Advance Technology portions of the project.

Status: Currently in Planning, PA&ED
Cost and Funding Sources:

Advance Technologies:

Cost (Millions) $57.21
Funding (Millions)
Measure J $0.55
STMP $2.00
Total Funding (Millions) $2.55
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $54.66
C-11A IRON HORSE TRA IL BICYCLE PEDESTR IAN OVERCROSSING – CITY

OF SAN RAMON
TVTC Project Sponsor: CCTA/San Ramon/CCC
Project Description: T he Iron Horse Trail (IHT) is an 18- mile regional non -motorized trail that runs north/south through the San Ramon Valley providing critical access to adjacent land uses. The construction of overcrossings at key locations will develop attractive travel alternatives for congestion relief for commute trips as well as enhanced facilities for s chool, shopping, and recreation trips. For the scope of this project, the proposed overcrossing location is Bollinger Canyon Road. At this location, the overcrossing will provide substantial benefits including:

1. Improve safety by eliminating conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists;

2. Improve motor vehicle circulation by removing the at-grade crossings;

3. Reduce and eliminate unsafe crossing maneuvers by pedestrians and bicyclists;

4. Enhance safety by providing an environment that encourages walking and bicycling along the Iron Horse Regional Trail; and

5. Increase trail usage by improving the connectivity at the Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon Road crossings.

Status: Currently in PA&ED, CEQA Completed. Design Underway. Construction anticipated 2022. 479
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 58

Cost and Funding Sources

Cost (Millions) $22.88
Funding (Millions)
OBAG2 $4.80
Measure J (Transportation for Livable
Communities) $2.51
Measure J (TLC future year pre-
commitment) $4.98
San Ramon General Fund $2.00
Total Funding (Millions) $14.30
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $8.58
C-11B IRON HORSE TRA IL BICYCLE PEDESTR IAN OVERCROSSING – CITY

OF SAN RAMON
TVTC Project Sponsor: CCTA/San Ramon/CCC
Project Description: T he Iron Horse Trail (IHT) is an 18- mile regional non -motorized trail that runs north/south through the San Ramon Valley providing critical access to adjacent land uses. The construction of overcrossings at key locations will develop attractive travel alternatives for congestion relief for commute trips as well as better facilities for school, shopping, and recreations trips. For the scope of this project, the proposed overcrossing location is Bollinger Canyon Road. At this location, the overc rossing will provide substantial benefits including:

1. Improve safety by eliminating conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists;

2. Improve motor vehicle circulation by removing the at-grade crossings;

3. Reduce and eliminate unsafe crossing maneuvers by pedestrians and bicyclists;

4. Enhance safety by providing an environment that encourages walking and bicycling along the Iron Horse Regional Trail; and

5. Increase trail usage by improving the connectivity at the Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon Road crossings.

Status: Currently in PA&ED, CEQA Completed
Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $19.69
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $19.69

480
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 59

C-11C IRON HORSE TRA IL CROSSING AT DUBLI N BOULEVARD
TVTC Project Sponsor: Dublin
Project Description: This project will build a bicycle and pedestrian bridge over Dublin Boulevard in order to connect two segments of the Iron Horse Trail. This bridge will create a total separation between vehicles and bicyclists/pedestrians. This will eliminate the possibility of motorized vehicles and pedestrians having a collision, making this segment of the road safer for all users. Along with this, congestion will be reduced as cars will no longer have to wait for pedestrians. This reduction of congestion will also allow for the transit to operate more efficiently. Pedestrians and bicyclists will also not have to wait for a walk signal since they will be able to continue their walk or ride without stopping.

The bridge will follow ADA requirements so that disabled people will be able to use it as well. This bridge will also be aesthetically pleasing in order to attract users and improve the user’s experience. The bridge will also connect BART to Dublin in a safe manner, encouraging recreational user of the Iron Horse Trail and the opening of local businesses. This safe and fast route of crossing the Iron Horse Trail will promote walking and bicycling for both recreational and commuting purposes in Dublin, this encouraging the shift from motorized vehicles to alternative forms of transportation.

Status: The project is currently in the final design phase. Additionally, Environmental Analysis of the project is currently in-progress.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $11.60
Funding (Millions)
2014 MBB $6.05
TFCA $0.86
Local $0.23
Private $1.00
Total Funding (Millions) $11.60
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) -
C-11D IRON HORSE TRA IL
TVTC Project Sponsor: Livermore
Project Description: This project will extend existing trail and provide gap closures.

Status: Feasibility Study/Environmental Complete
Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $26.99
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $26.99
481
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 60

C-11E IRON HORSE TRA IL TO SHADOW CLIFFS CONNECTION
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton, Alameda County
Project Description: Currently, the Iron Horse Trail (IHT) ends as a narrow-paved path to the overcrossing bridge of the regional railway on the east side of Valley Avenue, where there is a flat, paved spaced under the railroad bridge that could accommodate the trail.

This project would construct a continuous Class I trail, at least 10 feet wide, and would include protected intersection improvements and additional crossing improvements of Valley/Bernal and Stanley to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Status: This project has not started.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $1.65
Funding (Millions)
Pleasanton TIF $0.60
Direct Developer Fee $0.75
Total Funding (Millions) $1.35
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.30
C-11F IRON HORSE TRA IL CONNECTION IMPROV EMENTS AT SANTA RITA ROAD
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton
Project Description: The Iron Horse Trail (IHT) is a major north- south regional route for bicyclists and cyclists. The Arroyo Mocho Trail (AMT) is an important east -west route for bicyclists and pedestrians extending to Livermore that bypasses many busy streets.

This project would improve connections from the IHT on Santa Rita Road to the AMT. The AMT would receive an improved Class I Pathway. A new pedestrian bridge would be constructed over the Arroyo Mocho to connect the southern Arroyo Mocho Class I pathway to the IHT to the north. The IHT then connects to the north and provides access to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station.

Status: This project has not started. TBD
Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $0.87
Funding (Millions)
Pleasanton TIF $0.40
Total Funding (Millions) $0.40
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.48
482
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 61

C-11G IRON HORSE TRA IL BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN O VERCROSSING –

TOWN OF DANVILLE
TVTC Project Sponsor: Danville/CCC/CCTA
Project Description: T he Iron Horse Trail (IHT) is an 18- mile regional non -motorized trail that runs north/south through the San Ramon Valley providing critical access to adjacent land uses. The construction of overcrossings at key locations will develop attractive travel alternatives for congestion relief for commute trips as well as better facilities for school, shopping, and recreations trips. For the scope of this project, the proposed overcrossing location is Bollinger Canyon Road. At this location, the overcrossing will provide substantial benefits including:

1. Improve safety by eliminating conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists;

2. Improve motor vehicle circulation by removing the at-grade crossings;

3. Reduce and eliminate unsafe crossing maneuvers by pedestrians and bicyclists;

4. Enhance safety by providing an environment that encourages walking and bicycling along the Iron Horse Regional Trail; and

5. Increase trail usage by improving the connectivity at the Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon Road crossings.

Status: PSR (Feasibility Study) completed. Project will require coordination, permitting, and agreements with Contra Costa County. East Bay Regional Parks Direct and various utilities.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $19.78
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $19.78
C-11H IRON HORSE TRA IL SYSTEM -WIDE IMPROVEM ENTS
TVTC Project Sponsor: Contra Costa County, Town of Danville, City of San Ramon, Alameda County, City of Dublin, City of Livermore, and City of Pleasanton Project Description: As the primary regional multi -modal corridor between Contra Costa and Alameda County, the Iron Horse Trail is the spine for active modes of travel in the East Bay. The proposed project for the Iron Horse Trail includes safety, operational, and capacity improvements within the TVTC boundary from Alamo to Livermore. The proposed project and associated cost estimate includes safety improvements at roadway crossings, a proposed parallel path to separate users according to speed, and a buffer between users traveling at high or low speed. The improvements would include features such as passive detection at road crossings, actuated flashers or warning signals at roadway crossings, high visibility markings, minor grading, construction of a new 10 foot wide parallel asphalt path with shoulders, and a buffer between high and low speed corridors which may include vegetation or fencing to maintain safe separation. Other safety improvements may be necessary to fit site conditions and as determined through additional study.

Separated grade crossings or bridges that have already been identified as critical for improved vehicle traffic flow at current at grade crossings and to improve safety for trail users are listed as separate projects 483
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 62

within the TVTC program. The cost and context for each bridge site warrants a specific project identification rather than to be included within the system-wide improvements under this project.

Status: A phasing plan has not yet been developed.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $85.60
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $85.60
C-12 I-680 INTERCHANGE IM PROVEMENTS AT H ACIENDA DRIVE TVTC Project Sponsor: Dublin and Pleasanton
Project Description: Implement I-580 Hacienda Drive Interchange Improvements, which includes reconstructing the overcrossing to add lanes.

I-580/Hacienda Drive interchange Improvements will include; reconstruction of overcrossing to provide additional northbound lane; widening of the eastbound off-ramp to include an additional lane to be used as a combined left and right turn lane; modifying signal and striping, modifying the westbound loop on- ramp; and widening of the westbound off-ramp to include a third left-turn lane.

Status: The project is currently in Preliminary Engineering phase and an EIR is currently underway.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $39.13
Funding (Millions)
Dublin TIF $4.95
Pleasanton TIF $0.04
Total Funding (Millions) $4.63
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $34.50
C-13 FALLON/EL CHARR O INTERCHA NGE
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore
Project Description: I -580/El Charro Road Interchange Improvements (Phase 2): reconstruction of overcrossing to provide four -lanes in each direction with bike lanes; reconstruction of the southbound to eastbound loop on- ramp; widening of the eastbound off -ramp to provide two exit lanes with two left turn and two right tum lanes; widening of the eastbound on-ramp; widening of the westbound off-ramp to provide two left tum and two right tum lanes; and widening of the westbound on-ramp.

Status: The project has not yet started.

484
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 63

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $34.51
Funding (Millions)
Dublin TIF $4.05
Pleasanton TIF $4.10
Livermore TIF $6.40
Total Funding (Millions) $14.55
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $19.96
C-14 VALLEY LINK RAIL (PH ASE 1)
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore, Alameda County Project Description: This project will connect Northern San Joaquin County communities to the Tri-Valley and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) through 41 miles of rail and 7 stations. The project will extend from the planned ACE N . Lathrop Station in the San Joaquin Valley through the Altamont Pass, then readily connect with the Dublin/Pleasanton BART terminus. The TVTDF would go towards construction cost and access improvement for three stations in Tri-Valley Area (Dublin/Pleasanton, Isabel, and Greenville).

Status: 2018-2020 Design/Environmental, 2019-2023 Procurement, 2020-2026 Design/Construction.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $258.25
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $258.25
C-15 TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEME NTS
TVTC Project Sponsor: Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore
Project Description: Provide connectivity for transit and vehicles between local art erials and regional facilities. This project will also focus on the first and last mile connectivity at key transit hubs and along major transit routes.

A. Support expansion and facilitate interoperability among par tner agencies of existing and future intelligent transportation system deployments, including connected/autonomous vehicles, integrated corridor management, transit vehicle operations, and emergency vehicle operations, among other uses.

B. Plan and implement connected and autonomous vehicle access in a seamless manner across Tri- Valley jurisdictions’ boundaries including arterial access to freeways. This requires a continued emphasis on sharing communication infrastructure, field equipment at jurisdictional boundaries, and data.

C. Update the existing communication links and enhance the existing connectiv ity of all Tri- Valley Traffic Operations Centers for on-going data and communication sharing. 485
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 64

D. Prepare corridors around transit centers and BART stations to implement Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs) to improve transit connectivity to shift travelers from Single Occupancy Vehicles (SOVs) to transit.

E. Prepare intersections around transit center and ABRT stations to accommodate the evolution of Connected Vehicle applications and Autonomous Vehicle technologies for improved traffic flow by building new and upgraded vehicle-to-infrastructure and vehicle-to-vehicle communications.

F. Test and develop standard/protocol at the intersections, through existing and new Vehicle- to- Everything (V2X) and Vehicle- to-Infrastructure (V2I) technologies as a regional standard to be adopted by the local agencies among the Tri -Valley Jurisdictions. These technologies will allow a vehicle to communicate in real time with its surroundings.

G. Work with regional agencies in incorporating signal and vehicle communications in day to day operations. This would include sharing of equipment and data for seamless integration of connected and autonomous vehicle access across Tri -Valley Jurisdictions and freeway infrastructure including express lanes.

The project will be implemented in phases. Phase 1 of the proposed project will comprise of a feasibility study to ident ify potential locations, improvements, and develop cost estimates at key transit hubs, along major transit routes, and at freeway access locations in tri-valley area. Phase 2 of the project will further the development of the project with completion of des ign and Phase 3 will compete the construction/implementation and operation of the proposed project.

Status: The project is currently not yet started.

Cost and Funding Sources
Cost (Millions) $0.33
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $0.33
C-16 I-680 EXPRESS BUS SERVICE
TVTC Project Sponsor: Alameda CTC, in partnership with CCTA Project Description: This project proposes to construct capital improvements and purchase buses in order to establish an ex press bus service on I -680. This project requires the construction of the I -680 Express Lane Gap Closure project, closing the gap in the express lanes between Alcosta Blvd and State Route 84, in order to utilize the express lanes to avoid congestion, reduce travel time, and improve reliably, as part of an express bus service between the Tri -Valley communities and Silicon Valley. This express bus service would likely be combined with and become part of similar efforts by Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and their Innovate 680 program, with the intent to serve the entire I -680 corridor extending from Martinez to San Jose, utilizing buses to provide access to additional commute options, including BART, Amtrak, Caltrain, VTA light rail, local bus service, and Greyhound, for those living along the corridor.

The service would operate weekdays only, with proposed 20- minute headways during peak periods and one-hour headways during off -peak hours. The service would be bi -directional to avoid substantial deadhead time and to maintain a high level of service. New electric buses would be purchased as part of this project.
486
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 65

The project proposes to place express bus stops in the Tri-Valley area at the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station and at a future park and r ide to be constructed at the Bernal Avenue interchange in Pleasanton.

Understanding that the express buses must merge across all lanes of traffic to access the express lane, these stop locations are spaced to efficiently serve the Tri -Valley area while al so maximizing the express lane distance the bus is able to utilize in-between bus stops.

The estimated costs below assume that at each bus stop location there would be construction of roadway and bus stop improvements, including installation of transit amenities such as shelters, bike lockers, lighting, and real time information signs.

Status: A project schedule has not yet been developed.

Cost and Funding Sources:

Cost (Millions) $59.35
Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding (Millions) $0.00
Total Funding Shortfall (Millions) $59.35
487
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 66

APPENDIX C – PROJECT IMPROVEMENT CATEGORIES

Project Improvement
Category*
A-2a State Route 84 (SR 84) Expressway (I-580 to I-680) Roadway Capacity A-2b SR 84/I-580 Interchange Roadway Capacity
A-9a Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 1 Safety
A-9b Crow Canyon Road Improvements Phase 2 Safety
A-10a Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 1 Safety
A-10b Vasco Road Safety Improvements Phase 2 Safety
A-11 Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) – Phase 2 Safety B-1 I-580/I-680 Interchange (westbound to southbound) Roadway Capacity B-3 I-580/First Street Interchange Modification Roadway Capacity B-4 I-580/Vasco Road Interchange Modification Roadway Capacity B-5 I-580/Greenville Road Interchange Modification Roadway Capacity B-6 Jack London Boulevard Extension Roadway Capacity
B-7 El Charro Road Extension (Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard to Stanley Boulevard) Roadway Capacity
B-8 Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Widening Project (East of Blackhawk Drive to North Dublin Ranch Drive)
Roadway Capacity
Safety
B-10 I-680 Southbound HOV Lane Gap Closure (North Main Street to Rudgear Road) Roadway Capacity
B-11b I-680 Transit Corridor Improvements Transit
C-1 Tesla Road Safety Improvements Safety
C-2 Norris Canyon Road Safety Improvement Safety
C-3 Dublin Boulevard – North Canyons Parkway Extensions Roadway Capacity C-4 Vasco Road at Dalton Avenue Intersection Improvements Intersection C-5 El Charro Road Widening Roadway Capacity
C-6 Sunol/680 Interchange Improvements Roadway Capacity C-7 I-680 Express Lanes – Hwy 84 to Alcosta Roadway Capacity C-8 Santa Rita/I-580 Interchange Intersection
C-9 Stoneridge/I-680 Interchange Roadway Capacity
C-10 Innovate 680 Technology
C-11a Iron Horse Trail Bicycle-Pedestrian Overcrossing – Bollinger Canyon Road Pedestrian/Bicycle
C-11b Iron Horse Trail Bicycle-Pedestrian Overcrossing – Crow Canyon Road Pedestrian/Bicycle
C-11c Iron Horse Trail – Dublin Pedestrian/Bicycle
C-11d Iron Horse Trail – Livermore Pedestrian/Bicycle
C-11e Iron Horse Trail to Shadow Cliffs Pedestrian/Bicycle C-11f Iron House Trail Connection Improvements at Santa Rita Road Pedestrian/Bicycle C-11g Iron Horse Trail Bicycle/Pedestrian Overcrossing – Sycamore Valley Road Pedestrian/Bicycle
488
Tri-Valley Transportation Council │ 2020 Nexus Fee Update Study August 2021 │ Final 67

Project Improvement
Category*
C-11h Iron Horse Trail Safety Improvements Pedestrian/Bicycle C-12 Hacienda/I-580 Interchange Improvements Roadway Capacity C-13 Fallon/El Charro Interchange Improvements Roadway Capacity C-14 Valley Link Rail (Phase 1) Transit
C-15 Technology Enhancements Technology
C-16 I-680 Express Bus Service Transit
Note: Table only includes projects that have not been fully completed. * Improvement category used to determine project benefit for Nexus. Projects may also project additional benefits to the system.

489

Page 1 ends

Dublin City CouncilJune 21, 2022

Dublin City Council
June 21, 2022