Agenda packet — Dublin City Council, July 16, 2024 (part 3 of 8)

Project: msproj11
Date: Fri 4/26/24

PROJECT SCHEDULE
393
STORMWATER NPDES INSPECTION SERVICES | 13

PROJECT BUDGET
Billable Rate ($/ hour)
1 NPDES Administration

1.1 Annual Project Kickoff 6 $1,420

1.2 Develop Site Matrix/Update Site Matrix 12 $2,568

1.3 Inspection Plan 16 $3,528

1.4 Identify Regulated Projects 8 $1,764

1.5 Meetings (assume 2) 4 $882

1.6 QA/QC 4 $1,076
Task 1 Subtotal 50 $11,238
2 1st Inspection

2.1 Outreach to Owner/Operators 32 $6,432

2.2 1st Inspection (assume 25 sites) 163 $30,475

2.3 Documentation 88 $16,700

2.4 Meetings (assume 3) 9 $1,848

2.5 QA/QC 4 $1,076
Task 2 Subtotal 296 $56,531
3 2nd & 3rd Inspection

3.1 Outreach to Owner/Operators 20 $3,968

3.2 2nd Inspection (assume 15 sites) 83 $15,825

3.2 3rd Inspection (assume 5 sites) 29 $5,595

3.3 Documentation (incl. Annual Inspection Report) 98 $18,710

3.4 Meetings (assume 3) 9 $1,848

3.5 QA/QC 8 $2,152
Task 3 Subtotal 247 $48,098
4 Illicit Discharge and Spill Response (assume 12)

4.1 Investigation & Source Identification 108 $20,928

4.2 Containment & Mitigation 42 $8,208

4.3 Cleanup & Remediation 60 $12,528

4.4 Documentation 48 $9,492

4.5 QA/QC 12 $3,228
Task 4 Subtotal 270 $54,384
593 $170,251
Reimbursable Expenses
General Expenses $5,000
$5,000
$175,251
$525,753
12 4 10 15
Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES
Permit Inspections and Illicit Discharge
and Spill Response Services

SUMMARY OF LABOR EFFORT

05.06.2024
44 0
4 3 33
4 376
8 91
8 30 341
48 12
33 8
48 3
12 12
6 Labor Total
12 Total CSW|ST2 Cost per Year:

Total Reimbursable Expenses:
6 24
8 12 42 126
12 116
30 55
27 121
4 50
Robert Stevens
Principal
Julia Harberson
Project ManagerTotal CSW|ST2 Budget
240.00
2 8
Kristine Pillsbury
Project Oversight Inspector
201.00
2 8
Varies Inspectors
175.00
Total CSW|ST2 Hours
CSW/ST2
2 269.00
Total CSW|ST2 Cost (3-Years):
90 24
48 48
22 18 18
50 8
20 8 40
45 165
8 27
30 4 100
8 8
12 100
394
14 | CITY OF DUBLIN

Berkeley
Novato
Petaluma
Pleasanton
Redwood City
Richmond
CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. Engineers │ Land Planners │ Surveyors

BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024

ENGINEERING SERVICES HOURLY RATES
Senior Engineer $ 201.00
Engineer I, II, III $ 144.00, $ 175.00, $ 194.00
Engineer Technician
Engineer Assistant
$ 131.00
$ 101.00

SURVEYING SERVICES HOURLY RATES

OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOURLY RATES
Principal $ 269.00
Associate Principal $ 245.00
Senior Project Manager
Project Manager
Sr. Landscape Architect
Landscape Architect
Construction Manager
$ 240.00
$ 226.00
$ 172.00
$ 156.00
$ 235.00
Resident Engineer $ 226.00
Field Engineer
Technical Writer
$ 194.00
$ 138.00
Graphic Illustrator $ 131.00
Project Assistant $ 101.00
• All expenses for transportation (mileage, bridge fare, etc.) will be charged at the Internal Revenue Service rate plus 10%.
• Filing fees, checking fees, prints, and other outside costs (such as agency submittal/permit fees etc.) will be charged at cost, plus service charges at the rate of 10%. • Billing will be monthly net 30 days.

Senior Surveyor $ 201.00
Surveyor I, II, III $ 144.00, $ 175.00, $ 194.00
Survey Technician
Survey Assistant
$ 131.00
$ 101.00
Two Person Survey Party $ 340.00
Survey Party Chief $ 220.00
Survey Chainman
Survey Apprentice
Aerial Drone Surveyor
$ 120.00
$ 112.00
$ 217.00

RATE SCHEDULE
395
STORMWATER NPDES INSPECTION SERVICES | 15

APPENDIX
396
16 |

INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN
Strawberry Creek Culvert Repair, Berkeley
Wildcat Canyon Drainage Repairs, Berkeley
Martin Canyon Creek Flood Damage
Repair, Dublin
Francisco Boulevard Improvements, San
Rafael
Northgate Walk, San Rafael
San Pablo Avenue Streetscape
Improvements: Pinole Parking Lot
Upgrades, Pinole
Doherty Drive Complete Streets, Larkspur
Main Street Enhancement, Tiburon
Fairgrounds Water Quality Improvements,
Vallejo

HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULIC STUDIES
UCSF Mission Bay Hospital – 4th Street
Closure Hydrology & Hydraulic Study, San
Francisco
Pastori Storm Drain Outfall Hydrology and
Hydraulic Analysis, Town of Fairfax
Solano Community College District Master
Plan Stormwater Review Report, Fairfield,
Vallejo, and Vacaville campuses
Ukiah Courthouse Hydrology Study, Ukiah
Roblar Road Quarry Reclamation Plan,
Petaluma

EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering, Portland State
University

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer
-California - No 76626
QSD/QSP Certificate #00352
Julia is a registered civil engineer who
specializes in hydrology and hydraulics related
to green infrastructure. Julia’s expertise includes qualifications to prepare Storm Water Pollution Prevent Programs (SWPPP) to assist with the compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities, otherwise known as the Construction General Permit (CGP).

JULIA HARBERSON PE, QSD, LEED AP

PROJECT MANAGER
397
| 17

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Path to Transit Project manager responsible for street and trail improvements as well as the restoration of Refugio Creek
and the North Channel.

Santa Venetia, San Rafael Project engineer responsible for value engineering analysis and selection of a vinyl sheet
pile solution for the levee improvement
project.

Dredging, Port of Richmond Project
manager responsible for dredging episodes for the Santa Fe Channel and inner harbor terminals.

San Lorenzo Creek Trail, HARD Project
engineer responsible for technical support and cost estimates associated with the ATP grant.

Lagunitas Watershed , Marin County
Project manager responsible for 72 culvert replacements within the Lagunitas Creek Watershed in Marin County.

County of Marin On-Call Support
Project Management 2018 to Current
Providing peer and project review, cost
estimating support, and technical support
for the County Council.

Port of Richmond On-Call Support
2011 to Current Provided general infrastructure, building improvements, and construction management services.

Alameda County On-Call Support 2007
to 2017 Provided planning and design
for street improvement projects.

City of Hercules On-Call Support 2014
to 2017 Provided planning, design, and
construction management services for
various street and infrastructure projects.

City of El Cerrito On-Call 2011 to 2018
Provided planning, design, and construction management for paving and sidewalk projects including emergency support for landslides and sinkholes.

EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering, San Jose State
University

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer
-California - No 58660
Professional Traffic Engineer
-California - No 2953
Robert specializes in developing private
and public infrastructure projects delivering
more than $200 million in construction valuation over the last 10 years. Engaged throughout the life of the project, his experience ranges from conceptual design to detailed engineering culminating in final construction. Robert coordinates the design effort of the team, public agencies, community organizations, and private parties resulting in consensus based solutions delivered on schedule and budget.

ROBERT STEVENS PE, TE, LEED AP

PRINCIPAL
398
18 |

SELECTED EXPERIENCE
Strawberry Creek Culvert Repair, Berkeley
Wildcat Canyon Drainage Repairs, Berkeley
Martin Canyon Creek Flood Damage
Repair, Dublin
California Statewide Community College
District Storm Water Management Plan
Template
County of Solano Architectural, Engineering Professional On-Call Services, Solano Blithedale Avenue Complete Street Feasibility Study, Mill Valley City of Vallejo Civil and Surveying On-Call
Support, Vallejo
Guide Dogs for the Blind Training Facilities,
Marin County
Hamilton Marketplace SWPPP, Novato
San Pablo Subdivision Stormwater Management, Novato
AEGIS Assisted Living Center, San Rafael
Hydraulic Analysis of Arroyo San Jose, Novato
Hydraulic Assessment for the Petaluma
River Trail Enhancement Project, Petaluma
Redwood Lodge Subdivision, Mill Valley
San Mateo Community College District
Storm Water Management Plans
Solano Community College District Storm
Water Management Plans
Foothill DeAnza Community College District Storm Water Management Plans, Santa Clara County Buck Institute for Age Research, Novato

EDUCATION
B.S. Civil Engineering, University of California, Davis

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil Engineer
California - No 61685
QSD/QSP Certificate #00830
QISP Certificate #00757
Kristine has more than 20 years of engineering
design and project management experience.

She has many years of experience preparing stormwater management plans and stormwater pollution prevention plans for both public and private entities. Her work has also includes hydrologic analysis to evaluate peak flows from watersheds of hundreds of acres and stream modeling to determine design water surface elevations and support the preparation of Letters of Map Revision applications to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Kristine served on the Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Citizens Advisory Committee.

KRISTINE PILLSBURY PE, QSD, QISP

OVERSIGHT INSPECTOR
399
5870 Stoneridge Mall Road
Suite 203
Pleasanton, CA 94588
400

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 4 ends

Agenda Item 5.9
DATE: July 16, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Forest Park, CIP No. PK0322 - Approval of Plans and Specifications, Award of Contract to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc., and Approval of a Budget Change
Prepared by: Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications and awarding a construction contract to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Forest Park Project. The project will construct a two-acre park located along Central Parkway, Pino Grande Road, Twain Harte Road, and Pandora Way. The City Council will also consider approving a budget change to increase the project funding.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Forest Park Project, CIP No. PK0322, and approve the budget change.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

As approved in the 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the total budget for the project is $3,148,947. The base bid submitted by Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. is $2,197,000.

Staff recommends approval of the base bid and a 10% construction contingency in the amount of $219,700 to facilitate change orders for unforeseen construction issues, bringing the total potential construction contract amount to $2,416,700.

In addition to the construction contract, the project budget includes expenditures for utility connection fees and soft costs, which includes Staff time, consultant costs, permit fees, and other miscellaneous costs. In total, the estimated project cost is approximately $3,540,000, which will require a budget increase of $390,000. Staff proposes a budget change to allocate $350,000 in General Fund (Unassigned Cash Flow Reserve), and $40,000 from Measure BB Funds to cover the shortfall. The proposed project funding and costs are as follows:
401

Page 2 of 4 ends

Current Funding Source
Public Facility Fees $2,898,947
Measure BB $250,000
Total Project Funding $3,148,947
Proposed Project Costs
Base Bid $2,197,000
Construction Contingency $219,700
Utility Connection Fees (DSRSD & PG&E) $272,300
Soft Costs $849,947
Total Estimated Expenditures $3,538,947
Funding Shortfall $390,000
Additional Potential Funding Source
General Fund (Unassigned Cash Flow Reserve) $350,000
Measure BB $40,000
Total Additional Funding $390,000
DESCRIPTION:

The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Forest Park (formally known as Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Square) Project, CIP No. PK0322 (Attachment 2), which will construct a two-acre park along Central Parkway, Pino Grande Road, Twain Harte Road, and Pandora Way. On December 6, 2022, the City Council approved the schematic design for the project, which includes the following park amenities:
 One multi-use court that allows for basketball and futsal  Picnic tables, shade elements, and BBQ
 Fitness stations
 Playgrounds for ages 2 to 5 years and 5 to 12 years
 Grass area for free play
 Interior pathways for circulation and exercise
Additionally, the project construction will upgrade the existing pedestrian curb ramps and crosswalks along the park frontages of Central Parkway, Twain Harte Road, and Pino Grande Road to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The ADA upgrades portion of the project are funded through the Measure BB Sales Tax – Bike and Pedestrian Fund.

Bid Process and Results
The City of Dublin issued the bid package for the Forest Park Project on April 19, 2024. The bid package consisted of three base bid items. Three sealed bids were received on May 23, 2024 with 402

Page 3 of 4 ends

the base bids ranging from $2,197,000 to $2,865,707. The lowest base bid was submitted by Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. A summary of the bids is provided as Attachment 3.

Staff reviewed the bid results, checked references and necessary licenses, and recommends that the City Council award the construction contract to Suarez & Munoz Co., Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

To facilitate the approval of contract change orders and avoid construction delays, it is requested that the City Manager or designee be authorized to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $219,700. The resolution will authorize this change as it relates to the project. Staff expects work to begin in August 2024 and be completed late-spring 2025.

Community Workforce Agreement
On January 11, 2022, the City Council approved a Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) with the Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County and its Affiliated Local Unions.

The CWA is applicable to public works projects valued at over $1,000,000, ensures that there are no labor issues related to said projects, and bolsters local efforts to connect residents with careers in the building and construction trades. The CWA includes a Local Hire Goal where 20% of all hours on a project are worked by Local Residents, which are defined as individuals that reside within Alameda County or within a 15-mile radius of City limits. The CWA also requires contractors to hire one new apprentice for the first $1,000,000 of construction costs, and an additional new apprentice for every $5,000,000 construction costs, based on the engineer’s estimate. Apprentices must work a minimum of 10% of the total craft’s work hours, but the CWA allows that apprentices may be deployed to another project to ensure the minimum number of hours are met.

Staff worked with a consultant, Workforce Integrity and Training Solutions, to prepare bid documents and solicit bids for the Forest Park Project that comply with the provisions of the CWA.

The provisions include the requirement that responsive bidders include an executed Agreement to be Bound to and by the CWA, and that all subcontractors of the successful bidder also execute the Agreement to be Bound within 14 days after Notice of Award.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
On May 8, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-12 Adopting a CEQA Addendum for the Project Known as Jordan Ranch 2 Specific to Four Subareas and Adopting a Related Statement of Overriding Considerations, which specifically addressed the construction of Forest Park. No further action related to CEQA is necessary for the Project.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

A courtesy copy of this report was sent to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. The City Council Agenda was posted.
403

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract to Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Forest Park Project, CIP No. PK0322 2) CIP No. PK0322
3) Bid Results
4) Budget Change Form
404
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 07/16/2024 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO SUAREZ AND MUNOZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE FOREST PARK PROJECT, CIP NO. PK0322
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 the City Council approved the schematic design for the Forest Park Project (Project), formally known as Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Square, located along Central Parkway, Pino Grande Road, Twain Harte Road, and Pandora Way; and WHEREAS, the design team has completed the plans and specifications for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on May 23, 2024, publicly open, examine, and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved plans and specifications for the Project, which plans and specifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to Staff and Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. was determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for doing said work.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the Plans and Specifications for the Project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award the Contract for the Project to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc., at a bid of two million one-hundred and ninety-seven thousand dollars and zero cents ($2,197,000.00), the particulars of which bids are on file in the Office of the Public Works Director.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager or designee to approve the Project contract change orders based on the appropriated funds designated for the Project up to the contingency amount of two-hundred nineteen thousand seven-hundred dollars and zero cents ($219,700.00).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Construction Agreement for the Project with Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. and make any necessary, non-substantive changes to carry out the intent of this Resolution. {Signatures on the Following Page}
405
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted 07/16/2024 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
406
Parks Five-Year Capital Improvement Program 2024-2029
Number – PK0322 FOREST PARK Program – PARKS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project provides for the planning, design, and construction of a 2.0-acre neighborhood square in the Jordan Ranch Development. The neighborhood square will be designed in accordance with the Neighborhood Square Standards contained in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

PROJECT TIMELINE: The planning phase began in Fiscal Year 2021-22 and the conceptual plan was approved by the City Council in December 2022.

The project is currently in design and construction will start in 2024.

ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: $75,000
2024-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
9100 – Salaries & Benefits $117,578 $117,578
9200 – Contract Services $493,940 $25,000 $518,940
9400 – Improvements $1,904,749 $325,000 $2,229,749
9500 – Miscellaneous $282,680 $282,680
TOTAL $2,798,947 $350,000 $3,148,947

FUNDING SOURCE
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
4100 – Public Facility Fees $2,798,947 $100,000 $2,898,947 2215 – Measure BB Sales Tax – Bike &
Pedestrian Fund (ACTC) $250,000 $250,000
TOTAL $2,798,947 $350,000 $3,148,947
Attachment 2
407
Forest Park (formerly Jordan Ranch Neighborhood Square) PK0322
Bid Date:

BASE BID
ITEM Qty. UNIT Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension 1 1 LS $1,795,000.00 $1,795,000.00 $1,773,600.00 $1,773,600.00 $2,285,672.00 $2,285,672.00 2 Base Bid Item B - Off-Site Contract Work 1 LS $208,000.00 $208,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $387,783.00 $387,783.00 3 Base Bid Item C - Shade Structures 1 LS $194,000.00 $194,000.00 $425,000.00 $425,000.00 $192,252.00 $192,252.00 TOTAL $2,197,000.00 $2,298,600.00 $2,865,707.00
Suarez & Munoz
Construction, Inc.

Jensen Landscape Contractor
LLC
Project Name:

Project No. :

CITY OF DUBLIN

ENGINEERING DIVISION

BID SUMMARY
May 23,2024

LOW BIDDER
S and H Construction Inc.

DESCRIPTION
Base Bid Item A - Base Contract Work

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1 Attachment 3
408
Amount
pk0322.1001 (35009510.49999) - (General Fund - Transfer In) 350,000 pk0322.2214 (35009510.49999) - (Measure BB - Transfer In) 40,000 $390,000
350,000
40,000
7/16/2024
Posted By:

Expenses
10010010.89101 - (General Fund - Transfer Out)
22140010.89101 - (Measure BB - Transfer Out)

CITY OF DUBLIN
The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), total budget for the Forest Park project is $3,148,947. Based on the bid submitted by Suarez & Munoz Construction, Inc and additional construction costs, the projected project budget is approximately $3,540,000, which will require a budget increase of $390,000.

REASON FOR BUDGET CHANGE
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

BUDGET CHANGE FORM
Account
PK0322 Forest Park
Transfers Out

BUDGET INCREASE AMOUNT
pk0322.9400.9401 (Improvements)
Funding Sources
**********Finance Use Only**********
As Presented at the City Council Meeting
Attachment 4
409

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 4 ends

Agenda Item 5.10
DATE: July 16, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements – Safe Routes to School Project, CIP No. ST0517 - Approval of Plans and Specifications and Award of Contract to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc.

Prepared by: Oliver Castillo, Assistant Civil Engineer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications and awarding a construction contract to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. for the Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements – Safe Routes to School Project. The project will install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons and upgrades to existing curb ramps at the following locations: Amador Valley Boulevard/Burton Street, Central Parkway/Aspen Street, and Grafton Street/Antone Way. The project will also modify the traffic signal at Central Parkway/Hibernia Drive.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. for the Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements – Safe Routes to School Project, CIP No. ST0517.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The bid submitted by FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. is $1,511,600. Staff recommends a construction contingency of $150,000 (approximately 10%) to facilitate change orders for unforeseen construction issues, bringing the total potential construction cost to $1,661,600.

Sufficient funds are available in the approved budget for CIP No. ST0517. 410

Page 2 of 4 ends

DESCRIPTION:

The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project, CIP No. ST0517 (Attachment 2). The project provides for the planning, design, and construction of improvements to various pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout the City, including pedestrian/bicycle bridges, annual sidewalk repair, and the Safe Routes to School improvements at various intersections.

The Safe Routes to School portion of the Project will include the installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at the intersections of Amador Valley Boulevard/Burton Street, Central Parkway/Aspen Street, and Grafton Street/Antone Way, existing pedestrian curb ramp upgrades in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, and other minor appurtenant improvements. This project will also include a traffic signal modification and curb ramp modifications at the intersection of Central Parkway/Hibernia Drive.

On July 19, 2022, the City Council approved a project funding agreement with Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) (Agreement No. A22-0026) for the construction phase of the Safe Routes to School Project. The agreement allocated $390,000 in Vehicle Registration Fee funds for the construction of the improvements.

Bid Process and Results
The City of Dublin issued a bid package for the Safe Routes to School Project on April 22, 2024. The bid package consisted of 43 base bid items. Three sealed bids were received on May 16, 2024, with the base bids ranging from $1,379,756.50 to $1,578,859.25. The lowest base bid of $1,379,756.50 was submitted by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. A summary of the bids is provided as Attachment 3.

Staff conducted an initial review of the bid results, references, and necessary licenses of the submitted bidders. However, since this project is partially funded by Vehicle Registration Fee funds, Alameda CTC requires all bidders to comply with the Local Business Contract Equity (LBCE) Program. The LBCE Program has the following contract goals:
 For Local Business Enterprise (LBE): 60% for construction contracts  For Small Local Business Enterprise (SLBE): 20% for construction contracts The apparent lowest bidder, Sposeto Engineering, Inc., did not meet the construction contract goal for 60% LBE participation under the LBCE Program. Therefore, a Good Faith Efforts (GFE) review was required pursuant to the LBCE Program. Staff provided Alameda CTC with the GFE documentation from all three bidders. The GFE documentation was reviewed and analyzed by Alameda CTC’s Contract Equity Consultant, who prepared an initial report that was subsequently reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Review Team (IRT). The three-member IRT included one City staff member and two Alameda CTC staff members, who were nominated by the Alameda CTC Executive Director.

The IRT conducted a GFE review in accordance with the LBCE criteria and determined that Sposeto Engineering, Inc. did not meet the requirements of the LBCE Program for GFE. Therefore, 411

Page 3 of 4 ends

Sposeto Engineering, Inc.’s bid was deemed non-responsive and resulted in its rejection. The IRT concluded that the second lowest bidder, FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc., met the requirements for the LBCE Program for GFE. Staff recommends that the City Council award the construction contract to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

To facilitate the approval of contract change orders and avoid construction delays, it is requested that the City Manager or designee be authorized to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $150,000. The resolution will authorize this change as it relates to the project. Staff expects work to begin in late August 2024 and be completed in early 2025.

Staff worked with its consultant, Workforce Integrity and Training Solutions, to prepare bid documents and solicit bids for the Safe Routes to School Project that comply with the provisions of the CWA. The provisions include the requirement that responsive bidders include an executed Agreement to be Bound to and by the CWA, and that all subcontractors of the successful bidder also execute the Agreement to be Bound within 14 days after Notice of Award.

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
This project is exempt under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

A courtesy copy of this report was sent to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. and Alameda County Transportation Commission’s Independent Watchdog Committee. The City Council Agenda was posted.
412

Page 4 of 4 ends

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications and Awarding a Contract to FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. for the Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements – Safe Routes to School Project, CIP No. ST0517
2) CIP No. ST0517
3) Location Map
4) Bid Results
413
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item XX, Adopted 07/16/24 Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. XX - 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO FBD VANGUARD CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE CITYWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS – SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECT, CIP NO. ST0517 WHEREAS, the design team has completed the plans and specifications for the Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements – Safe Routes to School, CIP No. ST0517, (Project) which includes installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons at Amador Valley Boulevard/Burton Street, Central Parkway/Aspen Street, and Grafton Street/Antone Way, existing pedestrian curb ramp upgrades, and other minor appurtenant improvements, as well as. traffic signal modification and curb ramp upgrades at the intersection of Central Parkway/Hibernia Drive; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on May 16, 2024, publicly open, examine, and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved plans and specifications for the Project, which plans and specifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and WHEREAS, the low bid from Sposeto Engineering, Inc. was deemed non-responsive due to not meeting the Alameda County Transportation Commission’s Local Business Contract Equity Program requirements for Good Faith Efforts; and
WHEREAS, the bid submitted by FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. met the requirements for the Alameda County Transportation Commission’s Local Business Contract Equity Program and was determined to be the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder for doing said work.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby approves the Plans and Specifications for the Project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award the Contract for the Project to the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder, FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. at a base bid of $1,511,600, the particulars of which bids are on file in the Office of the Public Works Director.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Construction Agreement for the Project with FBD Vanguard Construction, Inc. and make any necessary non-substantive changes to carry out the intent of this Resolution. 414
Reso. No. XX-24, Item XX, Adopted 07/16/2024 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
415
Attachment 2
Number – ST0517 CITYWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS Program – STREETS

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project includes planning, design, and construction of improvements to various pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout the City, including pedestrian/bicycle bridges and annual sidewalk repair. This project includes design and construction of improvements recommended in the updated Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, which was adopted by the City Council on January 10, 2023, as well as the Safe Routes to School improvements.

The project also includes an update to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan and implementation of Public Right-of-way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG). The plan update will include a review of City buildings, parks, and rights-of-way.

PROJECT TIMELINE: The Downtown pedestrian crossing improvements on Regional Street is the first project to be constructed. The design is 95% complete, and construction will begin in summer/fall 2024. The Safe Routes to School improvements at the intersections of Central Parkway at Aspen Street and Hibernia Drive, Grafton Street at Antone Way, and Amador Valley Boulevard at Burton Street are anticipated to begin construction in 2024. The ADA Transition Plan update, funded by the General Fund, is anticipated to be completed in 2025.

ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: $12,000
2024-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

ESTIMATED COSTS
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
9100 – Salaries & Benefits $127,372 $50,728 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $258,100 9200 – Contract Services $1,314,668 $555,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $2,669,668 9400 – Improvements $3,173,298 $1,175,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $6,448,298 9500 – Miscellaneous $40,034 $7,500 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $67,534 TOTAL $4,655,372 $1,788,228 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $9,443,600 416
PRIOR
YEARS 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 FUTURE

YEARS TOTALS
1001 – General Fund $858,000 $105,000 $963,000
2203 – Transportation Development Act $210,000 $210,000 2204 – Measure B Sales Tax - Local
Streets Fund (ACTC) $510,000 $510,000
2205 – Measure B Sales Tax - Bike &
Pedestrian Fund (ACTC) $142,900 $142,900
2214 – Measure BB Sales Tax - Local
Streets Fund (ACTC) $1,471,600 $630,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,001,600 2215 – Measure BB Sales Tax - Bike &
Pedestrian Fund (ACTC) $601,872 $698,228 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $2,400,100 2212 – Vehicle Registration Fee $726,000 $726,000
2217 – Measure BB Grants $135,000 $135,000
2220 – Road Maint. & Rehab. Account
(RMRA) $355,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,355,000 TOTAL $4,655,372 $1,788,228 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $9,443,600 417
Attachment 3
L
o
catio
n
Map
418
Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements - "Safe Routes to School: Crosswalk and Curb Ramp Improvement Projects and Traffic Signal Modification Project ST0517
Bid Date:

BASE BID
ITEM Qty. UNIT Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension 1 1 LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $127,000.00 $127,000.00 $140,000.00 $140,000.002 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $110,500.00 $110,500.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.003 1 LS $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,035.00 $25,035.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.004 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $44,750.00 $44,750.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.005 1 LS $56,000.00 $56,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.006 147 CY $375.00 $55,125.00 $310.00 $45,570.00 $170.00 $24,990.007 6 SY $600.00 $3,600.00 $1,094.00 $6,564.00 $400.00 $2,400.008 4,886 SF $5.00 $24,430.00 $10.00 $48,860.00 $22.00 $107,492.009 633 LF $22.00 $13,926.00 $23.00 $14,559.00 $18.00 $11,394.00 10 490 SF $5.00 $2,450.00 $12.00 $5,880.00 $10.00 $4,900.0011 3 EA $2,500.00 $7,500.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,300.00 $6,900.0012 4 EA $275.00 $1,100.00 $1,425.00 $5,700.00 $6,400.00 $25,600.0013 42 LF $90.00 $3,780.00 $90.00 $3,780.00 $130.00 $5,460.0014 1 EA $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,850.00 $5,850.00 $9,700.00 $9,700.0015 1 EA $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $7,250.00 $7,250.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.0016 264 TON $320.00 $84,480.00 $380.00 $100,320.00 $623.00 $164,472.0017 406 SF $36.50 $14,819.00 $65.00 $26,390.00 $63.00 $25,578.0018 6,086 SF $24.00 $146,064.00 $31.00 $188,666.00 $28.00 $170,408.0019 599 LF $96.00 $57,504.00 $115.00 $68,885.00 $50.00 $29,950.0020 134 LF $68.00 $9,112.00 $80.00 $10,720.00 $148.00 $19,832.0021 52 LF $33.00 $1,716.00 $117.00 $6,084.00 $35.00 $1,820.0022 79 LF $33.00 $2,607.00 $127.00 $10,033.00 $45.00 $3,555.0023 22 LF $33.00 $726.00 $140.00 $3,080.00 $55.00 $1,210.0024 190 SF $52.00 $9,880.00 $77.00 $14,630.00 $105.00 $19,950.0025 366 SF $60.00 $21,960.00 $82.00 $30,012.00 $35.00 $12,810.0026 8 CY $118.00 $944.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 $230.00 $1,840.0027 37 EA $158.00 $5,846.00 $250.00 $9,250.00 $450.00 $16,650.0028 14 EA $282.00 $3,948.00 $225.00 $3,150.00 $290.00 $4,060.0029 9 EA $158.00 $1,422.00 $550.00 $4,950.00 $540.00 $4,860.0030 5 EA $376.00 $1,880.00 $300.00 $1,500.00 $390.00 $1,950.0031 4,160 LF $8.20 $34,112.00 $6.50 $27,040.00 $8.40 $34,944.0032 88 SF $12.50 $1,100.00 $10.00 $880.00 $13.00 $1,144.0033 448 LF $19.00 $8,512.00 $15.00 $6,720.00 $20.00 $8,960.0034 500 LF $37.60 $18,800.00 $30.00 $15,000.00 $39.00 $19,500.0035 400 LF $18.80 $7,520.00 $15.00 $6,000.00 $20.00 $8,000.0036 160 LF $13.20 $2,112.00 $10.50 $1,680.00 $14.00 $2,240.0037 155 LF $9.80 $1,519.00 $7.75 $1,201.25 $10.00 $1,550.0038 256 SF $25.00 $6,400.00 $20.00 $5,120.00 $26.00 $6,656.0039 75 LF $7.50 $562.50 $6.00 $450.00 $7.00 $525.0040 1 LS $380,000.00 $380,000.00 $353,000.00 $353,000.00 $339,650.00 $339,650.00 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Detail 38)Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Detail 41)Thermoplastic Pavement MarkingYellow Curb StripeTraffic Signal Modification at Centrail & HiberniaThermoplastic Traffic Stripe (Detail 22)Instal Post and Foundation for Roadside SignRemove Traffic Stripes and Lane MarkersInstall Concrete Pavers Detectable Warning SurfaceNative Backfil CompactedRemove Roadside SignInstall Roadside SignRemove Post and Foundation for Roadside SignMinor Concrete (Caltrans Type A1-8 Curb)Minor Concrete (4" Retaining Curb)Minor Concrete (6" Retaining Curb)Minor Concrete (8" Retaining Curb)Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter)Remove Thermoplastic Pavement MarkingsThermoplastic Stripe (12") (White and Yellow)Thermoplastic Stripe (24") Yellow

DESCRIPTION
Mobilization (Max 10% of total base bid)Remove Concrete (Sidewalk)Water Pollution Control WorkRoadway ExcavationTraffic Control and Public Convenience (Max 10% of total base bid)Clear and GrubPotholingMinor Concrete (Stamped Concrete)Remove Existing Tree0.17' Cold Plan Asphalt ConcreteRemove Brick Pavers Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)Reconstruct Existing Storm Drain InletMinor Concrete (Sidewalk)Reconstruct Type III Sidewalk UnderdrainInstall Storm Drain InletAdjust Utility to Grade Remove Concrete (Curb and Guttter)

CITY OF DUBLIN

ENGINEERING DIVISION

BID SUMMARY
5/16/2024, 2:30pm
Project Name: Project No. :

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Sposeto Engineering Inc. FBD Vanguard Construction Inc. Ray's Electric 1 Attachment
4 419
41 1 LS $53,600.00 $53,600.00 $62,500.00 $62,500.00 $47,950.00 $47,950.00 42 1 LS $40,200.00 $40,200.00 $42,800.00 $42,800.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.0043 1 LS $80,500.00 $80,500.00 $90,500.00 $90,500.00 $71,900.00 $71,900.00 TOTAL $1,379,756.50 $1,578,859.25 $1,511,600.00
RRFB Installation at Central & AspenRRFB Installation at Amador Valley & BurtonRRFB Installation at Grafton & Antone

APPARENT LOW BIDDER LOWEST RESPONSIVE & RESPONSIBLE BIDDER 2 420

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 3 ends

Agenda Item 5.11
DATE: July 16, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to Add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising, and Signs – Prohibited Acts) (PLPA-2024-00049)
Prepared by: Gaspare Annibale, Associate Planner & Felicia Escover, Economic Development Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On June 25, 2024, the City Council considered amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to regulate sidewalk vendors in accordance with SB 946. This includes adding Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses) to establish regulations for sidewalk vendors, and amending Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts) to clarify that the City’s general restrictions on selling goods and services in City parks do not apply to sidewalk vendors. On June 25, 2024, the City Council waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance amendments with an adjustment to the wording of Section 4.50.060(B) that has been incorporated and reflected in Attachment 1. The City Council is now requested to waive the second reading and adopt the proposed Ordinance.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to Add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses), and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts).

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The adopted Master Fee Schedule includes a fee for Sidewalk Vending Permits to recover the City’s associated administrative costs.
421

Page 2 of 3 ends

DESCRIPTION:

Senate Bill 946 (SB 946) Sidewalk Vendors decriminalized and limited local regulation of sidewalk vending. The legislation expressly preempts any city regulations other than the time, place, and manner in which sidewalk vending can occur, and ensures that cities only adopt reasonable regulations related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns. The legislation also prohibits any enforcement other than administrative fines, imposes strict caps on those fines, and requires cities to develop an administrative process for vendors in violation to have their fines reduced to reflect their ability to pay.

The proposed sidewalk vending ordinance establishes minimum requirements for sidewalk vendors to protect pedestrians and customers as it relates to health, safety, or welfare concerns. In developing the ordinance, Staff looked at sidewalk vending ordinances other Tri-Valley cities have adopted, such as the Pleasanton and Danville, and referenced similar regulations where appropriate.

Staff has also prepared companion amendments to Dublin Municipal Code (DMC) Section

5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts) to clarify these regulations do not apply to sidewalk vendors.

On June 25, 2024, the City Council waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance amendments with an adjustment to the wording of Section 4.50.060(B) that has been incorporated and reflected in the draft Ordinance. Instead of saying “B. The sidewalk vendor permit shall be renewed annually,” the ordinance will say, “B. Sidewalk vendors shall apply for renewal annually.”
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and environmental documents be prepared. The City Council will consider finding the proposed ordinance and amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment and are not subject to CEQA review.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.
422

Page 3 of 3 ends

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to Add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses), and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts)
2) City Council Staff Report, dated June 25, 2024, Without Attachments 423
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 10 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 4.50 (SIDEWALK VENDING) TO TITLE 4 (REGULATION OF BUSINESSES), AND AMEND SECTION 5.100.090 (MERCHANDISING, ADVERTISING AND SIGNS – PROHIBITED ACTS) (PLPA-2024-00049)
The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The City occasionally initiates amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code (DMC) to clarify, add, or amend certain provisions to ensure that the DMC remains current with federal and state law, internally consistent, simple to understand and implement, and relevant to changes occurring in the community.

B. On September 17, 2018, the Governor approved Senate Bill 946 (SB 946), which decriminalized and limited local regulation of sidewalk vending.

C. SB 946 is intended to promote sidewalk vending as a legitimate economic activity and ensure that cities only adopt reasonable time, place, and manner regulations related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns.

D. SB 946 only applies to sidewalk vending in public rights-of-way; private rights-of-way are still subject to private and local regulations.

E. The City of Dublin (City) has initiated amendments to the DMC to establish regulations for sidewalk vendors in accordance with the provisions of SB 946. It addresses objective health, safety, and welfare concerns that arise from the use of public right-of-way for vending.

F. The proposed ordinance would add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses) and would require that all sidewalk vendors comply with the operating requirements of the ordinance in which reasonable time, place, and manner regulations have been established related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns. The regulations are designed to ensure accessibility standards are maintained; the safety of customers, pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists is prioritized; and the proper health and sanitary conditions are upheld.

G. The proposed ordinance would also amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts) to clarify that the City's general restrictions on selling goods and services in City parks do not apply to sidewalk vendors.

H. A Staff Report was submitted to the Dublin City Council on June 25, 2024, recommending approval of the amendments to the DMC.
424
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 10 I. The City Council held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) and Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts) on June 25, 2024, at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to be heard.

J. Proper notice of said ordinance was given in all respects as required by law.

K. The City Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony herein above set forth and used its independent judgment to evaluate the project.

SECTION 2. FINDINGS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures, require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The City Council will consider finding the proposed ordinance and amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment and are not subject to CEQA review.

SECTION 3. ADDITION OF CHAPTER 4.50
Chapter 4.50 is added to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses) of the Dublin Municipal Code and is to read and be numbered as follows:

Chapter 4.50

SIDEWALK VENDING
Sections:

Article I. General Provisions

4.50.010 Purpose—Authority.

4.50.020 Definitions.

4.50.030 Owner responsibility.

4.50.040 Violations—Penalty.

4.50.050 Ability to pay determination.

Article II. Permit Procedure

4.50.060 Permit—Required.

4.50.070 Application procedure and requirements.

4.50.080 Amendments to permit.

4.50.090 City sidewalk vending permit fee required.

4.50.100 Permit—Issuance or denial.

4.50.110 Permit—Grounds for denial.

4.50.120 Permit—Display requirements.

4.50.130 Revocation or suspension—Reasons.

4.50.135 Notification of revocation.

4.50.140 Appeal procedure.
425
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 10 Article III. Operating Requirements.

4.50.150 Requirements—Sidewalk vending.

4.50.160 Prohibited locations.

4.50.170 Sidewalk vending in parks.

Article I. General Provisions

4.50.010 Purpose - Authority.

The purpose of this Chapter is to establish regulations for sidewalk vendors in accordance with the provisions of SB 946. It aims to address objective health, safety, and welfare concerns that arise from the use of public right-of-way for vending. These concerns include ensuring accessibility standards; prioritizing the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists; as well as maintaining proper health and sanitary conditions.

4.50.020 Definitions.

Unless the provision or context otherwise requires, the definitions contained herein shall govern the construction of this Chapter.
“Applicant” means any person who applies for a permit as required by this Chapter. “Certified Farmers’ Market” means a farmers’ market operating in accordance with California Food and Agricultural Code 47004 et seq. in a location approved by the City of Dublin. “City Sidewalk Vendor Permit” means a permit issued to a sidewalk vendor by the Permit Administrator in accordance with this Chapter.
"Operator" refers to any individual responsible for the management and operation of a sidewalk vending enterprise.
"Owner" encompasses the following individuals or entities:

The sole proprietor of a sole proprietorship engaged in sidewalk vending.

Any general partner affiliated with a general or limited partnership that holds ownership of the sidewalk vending business.

Any person possessing a ten (10) percent or greater ownership stake in a corporation that possesses the sidewalk vending enterprise.

Any individual who is a member of a limited liability company (LLC) that has ownership rights in the sidewalk vending business.

All proprietors or stakeholders of any other type of business association that possesses ownership rights in the sidewalk vending business.

The principal business proprietor or entity that grants authorization for vendor operations within the business.
“Permit Administrator” means the Chief of Police or his/her designee. “Permittee” refers to any person operating or maintaining a sidewalk vending business. 426
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 4 of 10 “Right-of-Way” refers to all public streets, sidewalks, pedestrian paths, landscape areas, and easements, now and hereafter owned by the City.
“Roaming Sidewalk Vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who moves from place to place and stops only to complete a transaction.
“Sidewalk Vendor” means a person who sells food or merchandise from a pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack, or other nonmotorized conveyance, or from one’s person, upon a public sidewalk or other pedestrian path. “Special Event” means an event sponsored or approved by the City involving the exclusive use of a City street or property including, but not limited to an encroachment permit or special event permit.
“Stationary Sidewalk Vendor” means a sidewalk vendor who vends from a fixed location.

4.50.030 Owner responsibility.

For the purpose of enforcing the requirements of this Chapter, the owner of the sidewalk vending enterprise shall be responsible for the conduct of all employees, independent contractors, or other representatives while such persons are providing services on behalf of the business. The owner of the sidewalk vending enterprise must submit information on his or her operations, including if the sidewalk vendor is an agent of an individual, company, partnership, or corporation and the name and business address of the principal to the Permit Administrator during the permit application process. The Permit Administrator may discipline an owner or operator of the sidewalk vending business for the conduct of all individuals operating on behalf of the business.

4.50.040 Violation - Penalty.

A. Every person vending without a sidewalk vending permit may be subject to an administrative violation punishable by an administrative fine not to exceed:

1.Two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for a first violation.

2. Five hundred dollars ($500) for a second violation within one (1) year of the first violation.

3. One thousand dollars ($1,000) for each additional violation within one (1) year of the first violation.

The Permit Administrator may rescind a permit issued to a sidewalk vendor for the term of that permit upon the fourth violation or subsequent violations.

Upon proof of a valid permit, the administrative fines set forth in Section A shall be reduced to the administrative fines set forth in Section B, respectively.

B. Every person violating the provisions of this Chapter, except as identified in Section

4.50.040.A, is guilty of an administrative violation punishable by an administrative fine not to exceed:

1. One hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation.

2. Two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation within one year of the first violation. 427
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 5 of 10

3. Five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation within one (1) year of the first violation.

C.The Permit Administrator may rescind a permit issued to a sidewalk vendor for the term of that permit upon the fourth violation or subsequent violations.

D. Violations of this Chapter are not punishable as infractions or misdemeanors.

E. Failure to pay an administrative fine pursuant to this Chapter is not punishable as an infraction or misdemeanor. Additional financial conditions beyond those authorized in this Chapter shall not be assessed.

4.50.050 Ability-to-pay determination.

Any administrative citation issued under Chapter 4.50 will include instructions regarding the right to request an ability-to-pay determination. If the requestor meets the criteria described in Government Code Section 68632 (a) or (b), the City shall accept, in full satisfaction, twenty percent (20%) of the otherwise applicable fee.

Article II. Permit Procedure

4.50.060 Permit - Required.

A. Only sidewalk vendors with valid sidewalk vending permits issued by the Permit Administrator may vend upon the City’s public right-of-way.

B. Sidewalk vendors shall apply for renewal annually.

4.50.070 Application procedure and requirements.

An application for a sidewalk vending permit shall be submitted to the Permit Administrator on forms provided by Dublin Police Services and shall include the permit processing fee established by the City Council as part of the City’s Master Fee Schedule. Such forms shall require submission of the following information:

A. The name, address, and telephone number of the business owner and manager and any individuals who will be employed as sidewalk vendors under the permit.

B. A detailed description of the food/merchandise to be sold, a detailed description of the areas in which the sidewalk vendor intends to operate, anticipated hours of operation, and whether the vendor(s) will be roaming or stationary.

C. A copy of a California’s driver’s license or identification number, an individual taxpayer identification number, social security number, or other state-issued identification card. Such information is not a public record and will remain confidential as required by Government Code Section 51038(c)(4).

D. A copy of a valid California Department of Tax and Fee Administration seller’s permit, as required.

E. A copy of a valid mobile food facility permit issued by the Alameda County Department of Environmental Health, as required.
428
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 6 of 10 F. Proof of an unexpired business license or proof of current application for business license in the City.

G. An agreement to indemnify the City, its officers and employees, from any liability arising from use of the permit on the public right-of-way.

H. Proof of a policy or policies of comprehensive general liability insurance, in an amount of $1 million, approved by the City, and insuring against any injury, death, loss or damage as a result of wrongful or negligent acts or omissions by the permittee, with an endorsement naming the City as an additional insured. In addition, the permittee is required to carry workers’ compensation and automobile coverage sufficient to meet the requirements of the State of California.

I. Confirmation of compliance with all conditions and requirements of this Chapter.

J. Livescan form and fingerprints of the applicant.

K. Such other identification and information as deemed necessary by the Permit Administrator.

4.50.080 Amendments to permit.

A. When information provided in the application changes, the operator shall file an amendment to the permit within three (3) business days. The amendment form shall be accompanied by the fee established by the City’s fee schedule.

B. Amendments cannot be used to change goods or merchandise being vended or owners of a sidewalk vending business; new permit applications are required for such changes.

C. A denial of an application to amend a sidewalk vending permit may be appealed as outlined in Section 4.50.140.

4.50.090 City sidewalk vending permit fee required.

No sidewalk vending permit shall be issued until the appropriate fee has been paid. The fee for a city sidewalk vending permit shall be established by the City Council by resolution.

4.50.100 Permit - Issuance or denial.

The Permit Administrator shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of an application complying with all the provisions of this Chapter, issue a permit or deliver to the applicant, personally or by mail, written notice of denial of the permit, setting forth the reason or reasons for the denial, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.50.110.

4.50.110 Permit - Grounds for denial.

The Permit Administrator shall deny the permit if he/she finds:

A. That any information contained in or submitted with the application is not true, contains material misrepresentations, or if relevant or material information is omitted from the application; or B. That the operation as proposed by the applicant would not comply with any provision of this Chapter or any other ordinance or regulation of the City or any statute or regulation of the State of California; or
429
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 7 of 10 C. That, for any other reason, the operation as proposed would be detrimental to health, safety, or welfare; in violation of the requirement to maintain sanitary conditions; or in non-compliance with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and other disability access standards.

4.50.120 Permit - Display requirements.

Every sidewalk vendor must display their City-issued sidewalk vending permit on the street-side portion of their pushcart, stand, display, pedal-driven cart, wagon, showcase, rack, or other nonmotorized conveyance in a readily visible location when operating in the public right-of-way.

4.50.130 Revocation or suspension - Reasons.

A. A sidewalk vending permit issued pursuant to this Chapter may be suspended or revoked by the Permit Administrator for any of the following reasons:

1. The permittee provided false information on their application;

2. The permittee has failed to comply with the requirements of this Chapter on four (4) separate days in a twelve (12) month period; or

3. The permittee has conducted their business in a manner which endangers the public health, safety, or welfare.

4.50.135 Notification of revocation.

Revocation of a sidewalk vendor permit shall be served in writing no less than fourteen (14) days before the effective date of the revocation to the address listed on the initial application or to any subsequent address provided to the City by the permittee. Any applicant whose application for a sidewalk vendor permit is denied or whose permit is revoked may appeal such decision to the City Manager or designee pursuant to the provisions of Section 4.50.140.

4.50.140 Appeal procedure.

An applicant or permittee may appeal any action or determination of the Permit Administrator under the provisions of this Chapter to the City Manager pursuant to the provisions of Section

1.04.050.

Article III. Operating Requirements.

4.50.150 Requirements - Sidewalk vending.

A. Operational Requirements. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Chapter, all of the following operational requirements shall be applicable to all sidewalk vendors located within the City:

1. Ensure sidewalk accessibility by maintaining a 48-inch width unobstructed path, exclusive of the curb.

2. Prevent distractions and promote public welfare by refraining from the following: emitting any loud, unnecessary, and unusual noises consistent with the provisions of Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 5.28; using electrical, flashing, or animated signs; the use of tents, or displaying signage, banners, flags, or balloons that exceed a combined total of four (4) square feet. Any sign shall be attached flush to the sidewalk vending receptacle. 430
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 8 of 10

3. Maintain sanitary conditions to protect public health. Sidewalk vendors must have trash, recycling, and compost containers in or on their sidewalk vending receptacle; refrain from emptying trash into public trashcans; and must not leave any location without first picking up, removing, and properly disposing of all trash or refuse from their operation.

Additionally, sidewalk vendors must promptly clean up any food, grease, or other substances related to sidewalk vending activities that are discharged on public property.

B. Physical Facility Requirements. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Chapter, the following physical facility requirements shall be applicable to all sidewalk vendors located within the City:

1. A sidewalk vending permit does not grant an exclusive right to operate in any specific portion of the public right-of-way.

2. Equipment or objects used for sidewalk vending purposes may not be left or maintained in public spaces or in any portion of the public right-of-way from 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. in commercial areas and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. in residential areas. Any equipment or objects left overnight in public spaces or in any portion of the public right-of-way will be considered discarded and may be seized or disposed of by the City.

3. To prevent unintended rolling or slipping, sidewalk vendors are prohibited from operating pushcarts, pedal-driven carts, wagons, or other non-motorized conveyances on public rights-of-way with slopes greater than five (5) percent.

4. Additional Requirements. In residential areas, roaming sidewalk vendors may operate between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

4.20.160 Prohibited locations.

A. In order to protect pedestrian and vehicular safety and accommodate public street access including parking, traffic, and emergency road access, sidewalk vending shall be prohibited in the following locations:

1. On any sidewalk where the vendor does not leave at least a 48-inch width of unobstructed sidewalk adjacent to a curb. The 48-inch width cannot include curb dimensions.

2. On any sidewalk where there are no legal parking spaces within two hundred (200) feet, with the exception of parks.

3. Within twenty-five (25) feet of any crosswalk or intersection.

4. In any area that blocks or obstructs the visibility of traffic signals or regulatory signs.

5. In any driveway or parking lot access.

6. Within twenty-five (25) feet of any fire hydrant, fire call box, fire department connection, post indicator valves, or utility cabinets or equipment.

7. Within fifty (50) feet of any driveway entrance or exit to the City's Public Safety offices or any fire station.
431
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 9 of 10

8. Within fifty (50) feet of any area, structure or facility on which construction is occurring pursuant to a valid building or encroachment permit.

9. Within ten (10) feet of a litter receptacle, public art installation, or bike rack.

10. Within fifty (50) feet of a bus turnout, bus bench, or shelter.

11. Within fifty (50) feet from an outdoor dining area for a restaurant during the operating hours of the restaurant.

12. Within ten (10) feet from the entrance or exit doorway to any building or an automated teller machine.

13. Within five hundred (500) feet of any public or private school grounds prior to 4:00 p.m. on any day when the school is in session.

14. Within five hundred (500) feet of any public or private school grounds during sanctioned events held at the school.

15. Within fifty (50) feet of another sidewalk vendor.

16. On any median strip or landscaped area between the sidewalk and curb.

17. Within two hundred (200) feet of the perimeter of any Certified Farmers' Market or Special Event, during the hours when any such event is permitted. (Pursuant to Gov.

Code § 51038(d)(1)).

18. Immediately adjoining a bike lane when there is no other legal parking within two hundred (200) feet.

B. Stationary sidewalk vendors are prohibited from operating in areas that are exclusively residential.

4.50.170 Sidewalk vending in parks.

A. A stationary sidewalk vendor is prohibited from operating in a City park if the City has entered into an exclusive agreement for the sale of food or merchandise by one (1) or more concessionaires for that park.

B. Except as provided in Subsection A above, vending within City parks is allowed only upon or alongside sidewalks or other paved or marked pedestrian pathways. Outside of these aforementioned areas, vending shall not take place on sand, dirt, or parking lots. In addition, vending within City parks shall not be allowed where it would reduce sidewalk access below ADA minimums or within ten (10) feet of a public art installation, public information kiosk, or fountain.

C. In parks, sidewalk vendors shall not approach persons to sell food or merchandise.

D. Sidewalk vendors must comply with park hours.

SECTION 4. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 5.100.090
432
Ord. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 10 of 10 Section 5.100.090.A (Merchandising, advertising and signs—Prohibited acts) of Title 5 Public Welfare of the Dublin Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:

A. Teach, offer to instruct, sponsor a program or service for a fee, except any regularly licensed concessionaire or independent contractor acting by and under the authority and regulation of the Director;
All other subsections remain unchanged.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its final adoption.

SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if any provision, clause, sentence, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid, unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstance, such illegality, invalidity, unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts thereof of the Ordinance or their applicability to other persons or circumstances.

SECTION 7. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
433

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 4 ends

Agenda Item 5.11
DATE: June 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to Add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising, and Signs – Prohibited Acts) (PLPA-2024-00049)
Prepared by: Gaspare Annibale, Associate Planner & Felicia Escover, Economic Development Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Sidewalk Vendors Act (Senate Bill 946 or SB 946) decriminalized and limited local regulation of sidewalk vending. The legislation is intended to promote sidewalk vending as a legitimate economic activity and ensure that cities only adopt reasonable regulations related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns. Staff has prepared an ordinance amending the Dublin Municipal Code to regulate sidewalk vendors in accordance with SB 946. This includes adding Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses) to establish regulations for sidewalk vendors, and amending Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, advertising and signs— Prohibited acts) to clarify that the City’s general restrictions on selling goods and services in City parks do not apply to sidewalk vendors. The City Council will consider waiving the first reading and introducing the ordinance amending the Dublin Municipal Code.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Open the public hearing, deliberate, waive the reading, and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses), and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts).

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The Master Fee Schedule will be updated, under a separate item, to include a proposed fee for Sidewalk Vending Permits.

Attachment 2
434

Page 2 of 4 ends

DESCRIPTION:

Background
Senate Bill 946 (SB 946) Sidewalk Vendors decriminalized and limited local regulation of sidewalk vending. The legislation expressly preempts any city regulations other than the time, place, and manner in which sidewalk vending can occur, and ensures that cities only adopt reasonable regulations related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns. The legislation also prohibits any enforcement other than administrative fines, imposes strict caps on those fines, and requires cities to develop an administrative process for vendors in violation to have their fines reduced to reflect their ability to pay.

Under State law, a sidewalk vendor is a person who sells “food or merchandise” from any “nonmotorized conveyance” upon “a public sidewalk or other pedestrian path.” Sidewalk vendors can be stationary or mobile. Sidewalk vending does not, however, include food trucks or other persons selling their wares from motor vehicles or on private property.

Cities have a range of defensible regulations that can be adopted within the legislation’s limits such as requiring a Sidewalk Vending Permit. The legislation permits a range of reasonable regulations, including restrictions on hours of operations, location and zone restrictions, tax registration, and compliance with disability access standards. Cities can also require county health permits for food vendors; however, they cannot regulate on the grounds of public animus or concerns for economic competition. The legislation is intended to promote sidewalk vending as a legitimate economic activity and ensure that cities only adopt reasonable regulations related to objective health, safety, and welfare concerns.

Staff has also prepared companion amendments to Dublin Municipal Code (DMC) Section

5.100.090 (Merchandising, advertising and signs—Prohibited acts) to clarify these regulations do not apply to sidewalk vendors.

Analysis
Proposed Addition of Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) The proposed amendments to the DMC would add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses) to establish objective standards and regulations that directly relate to health, safety, and welfare, which comply with SB 946. The regulations include the following requirements:
 Permitting.
o All sidewalk vendors would be required to apply for and obtain a Sidewalk Vending Permit from Dublin Police Services. To obtain a permit, an Applicant would be 435

Page 3 of 4 ends

required to provide:
 Contact information,
 A detailed description of the food/merchandise to be sold,  Area of operation,
 Anticipated hours of operation,
 Whether the vendor would be roaming or stationary,
 Form of state-issued identification card,
 A valid Mobile Food Facility Permit issued by the County,  Proof of a business license,
 An agreement to indemnify the City,
 Proof of comprehensive general liability insurance,
 Confirmation of compliance with the regulations,
 Livescan and fingerprint information, and
 Sidewalk Vending Permit fee.
o All sidewalk vendors would be required to display their city-issued Sidewalk Vending Permit on their non-motorized conveyance when in operation.  Operating Requirements.
o All sidewalk vendors would be required to comply with the operating requirements of the ordinance including:
 Maintaining sidewalk accessibility,
 Preventing distractions related to loud noise and displaying certain visual content, and
 Maintaining sanitary conditions to protect public health. o Any equipment used for sidewalk vending purposes would not be allowed to be left or maintained in public spaces or public rights-of-way from 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. in commercial areas and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. in residential areas. o To prevent unintended rolling or slipping, sidewalk vendors would be prohibited from operating non-motorized conveyances on public rights-of-way with slopes greater than five percent.
o In residential areas, roaming sidewalk vendors can operate between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
o Restrictions on physical location are contained in Section 4.20.160 of the ordinance to protect pedestrian and vehicular safety and accommodate public street access including parking, traffic, and emergency road access. These regulations are designed to ensure that sidewalks are not blocked, that access to parking and buildings are not obstructed and that safety concerns on the adjoining roads are not created.
o Stationary sidewalk vendors are prohibited from operating in areas that are exclusively residential.
o Stationary sidewalk vendors are prohibited from operating in a City park if the City has entered into an exclusive agreement for the sale of food or merchandise by one 436

Page 4 of 4 ends

or more concessionaires for that park. If the City has not entered into an agreement, then vending within City parks is allowed only on or alongside sidewalks or other paved or marked pedestrian pathways where sidewalk accessibility is maintained.

Vendors must comply with park hours and not approach persons to sell food or merchandise.

Proposed Amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Section 5.100.090 Amendments are proposed to DMC Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, advertising and signs— Prohibited acts) to ensure compliance with SB 946 and to ensure internal consistency within the DMC. The proposed amendments to this Section clarify that the City's general restrictions on selling goods and services in City parks do not apply to Sidewalk Vendors. Attachment 2 provides the changes in redline format where underlined text is proposed to be added language to be added, and text with a strikethrough is proposed to be deleted.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

In accordance with State law, a public notice was published in the East Bay Times ten days prior to the hearing and posted at several locations throughout the City. The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to add Chapter 4.50 (Sidewalk Vending) to Title 4 (Regulation of Businesses), and Amend Section 5.100.090 (Merchandising, Advertising and Signs—Prohibited Acts)
2) Dublin Municipal Code – Redlined Pages
437

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 2 ends

Agenda Item 5.12
DATE: July 16, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers Prepared by: Darlynn Haas, Management Analyst II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from June 1, 2024 – June 30, 2024, totaling $14,352,606.97.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Receive the report.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

Summary of Payments Issued
Report Period June 1, 2024 – June 30, 2024
Total Number of Payments: 306
Total Amount of Payments: $14,352,606.97
DESCRIPTION:

The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the period beginning June 1, 2024, through June 30, 2024. This report is provided in accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011, in Resolution No.189-11. The listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies for processing payments and expenditures.

The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and (c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the legislative body, as long as such 438

Page 2 of 2 ends

payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial report.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

None.

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:

The City Council Agenda was posted.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Payment Issuance Report for June 2024
439
Date Issued
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024 PRIME TIME ENTERTAINMENT AKI KUMAR LIVE PERFORMANCE - SUMMER CONCERT SERIES 2,000.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. CONSTR. MGMT FALLON SPORTS PARK PH3 MAR 2024 4,083.75 PARKWAY BODY SHOP POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 2,367.08 NAMRATA BERRY REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 172.80
PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. INSP. SVCS. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL APR 2024 2,427.50 MERCY & THE MANZ ENTERTAINMENT LLC LIVE MUSIC PERFORMANCE 6/6/24 FARMER'S MARKET 1,500.00 LANLOGIC INC. LANLOGIC WEB PROTECTION 1,050.00
MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,328.40
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. DUBLIN BLVD NORTH CANYONS PRKWY EXT PROJ DEC 2023 3,893.58 LANLOGIC INC. PHISHING/END USER TRAINING 4,000.00
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL MARCH 2024 23,880.50 RETIREE MEDICAL RETIREE MEDICAL 3,091.35
JULIE CARDOZA REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 650.00
HEALTHEQUITY, INC. HEALTHCARE MAY 2024 & COMMUTER JUNE 2024 BENEFIT 601.25 GLOBAL LEADERSHIP INTIATIVES FOR YOUTH 2023 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION AWARDS 200.00 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC DPS TOWING SERVICE 425.00
EUROPEAN MOBILE WERKS POLICE VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 670.19 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES - EAST RANCH CFD 4,676.58 EOA, INC. STORMWATER NPDES IMPLEMENTATION ASSISTANCE JAN 2024 6,121.25 EOA, INC. STORMWATER NPDES IMPLEMENTATION ASSIST FEB 2024 8,103.25 EOA, INC. EVIRON & SUS DIVISION PLAN REVIEW JAN 2024 405.00 EOA, INC. EVIRON & SUS DIVISION PLAN REVIEW FEB 2024 945.00 DUBLIN CHEVROLET POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 39.95 DUSTIN STENE PETTY CASH WAVE SUMMER SEASON 500.00
DSRSD JORDAN RNCH NEIGHBORHD SQ. PLAN REVIEW FEE FEB 2024 2,612.00 DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS WAVE - OSHA INSPECTION AND CLASSIFICATION FEE 292.50 DAVID KNUTSEN AND/OR THOMAS KNUTSEN RETURN ASSET SEIZURE FUND-CASE: D20-00836 1,100.00 DC ELECTRIC GROUP INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET REPLACEMENT APRIL 2024 29,698.80 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLAN REVIEW DEC 2023 375.00 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLAN REVIEW AUG 2023 500.00 COULSON & ASSOCIATES JORDAN RANCH NEIGHBORHOOD SQUARE JAN 2024 332.50 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLAN REVIEW JAN 2024 250.00 CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING DAC SPECIAL INSPECT & TESTING APR 2024 406.08 CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. PERSIMMON DR PEDEST PATH DEC 2023 35,596.25 CDW GOVERNMENT INC CONFERENCE ROOMS LIGHTWARE MOUNTING 3,739.31 CITY OF PLEASANTON BIKE EAST BAY T-SHIRTS 2024 1,218.26 CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 468.00 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES INC. WALLIS RANCH PARK DESIGN SERVICES MAR 2024 13,544.29 CARBONIC SERVICE THE WAVE POOL CHEMICALS 318.05
CALLANDER ASSOCIATES INC. WALLIS RANCH PARK DESIGN SERVICES JAN 2024 4,033.10 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES INC. WALLIS RANCH PARK DESIGN SERVICES FEB 2024 5,055.69 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. WALLIS RANCH GEOTECH SRVS FOR SOIL APR2024 3,512.25 CALEHS ATTN: JOE MOULTON DESIGNATED UST OPERATOR INSP. SVCS JAN 2024 600.00 BLAISDELL'S BUSINESS PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES MAY 2024 1,339.26 BPXPRESS ANNUAL STREET RESURFACING PLAN SETS 452.85
BIG O'TIRES #7 POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 115.68 BKF ENGINEERS TASSAJARA RD GAP CLOSURE PROJECT JAN 2024 10,557.50 A4 PROMOTIONS & INCENTIVES OFFICE SUPPLIES - ENVELOPES 201.91 A4 PROMOTIONS & INCENTIVES WAVE SUPPLIES 1,184.60
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 1 of 8 ends

Payee Description Amount
ANGEL HOUZE CLAY ART C/O JULIE P. KARTONO REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 63.00 BADAWI & ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL AUDIT SERVICES FOR FY23-24 23,134.50 ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM POLICE INVESTIGATIVE MEDICAL EXAMS 1,274.00 AMY L. JONES REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 288.00
AKSHAY ARORA ARORA TENNIS & FITNESS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 8,429.55 ADMANOR,INC. WASTE PREVENTION OUTREACH 3,000.00
Attachment 1
440
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 2 of 8 ends

6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/3/2024
6/6/2024
6/7/2024
6/7/2024
6/7/2024
6/7/2024
6/7/2024
6/7/2024
6/10/2024
6/10/2024
6/10/2024
6/10/2024
6/10/2024
6/11/2024 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE REIMB Q3 FY 23-24 78.00 Payments Issued 6/11/2024 Total: 78.00
Payments Issued 6/10/2024 Total: 52,575.66
TAYLOR OSMER MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2024 102.58
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM PURCHASE CARD STATEMENT MAY 2024 52,343.16 BRADLEY OLSON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT JUNE 2024 27.47
NICOLE WANZENRIED MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2024 83.82
BRADLEY OLSON MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2024 18.63
US BANK - PARS PARS: PE 5/31/24 5,812.39
Payments Issued 6/7/2024 Total: 174,342.97
I C M A 401 PLAN DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 5/31/24 1,284.76 I C M A 457 PLAN DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 5/31/24 38,437.28 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 5/31/24 23,996.05 HEALTHEQUITY, INC. HEALTHEQUITY: PE 5/31/24 4,828.66
CAL PERS PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 5/31/24 99,983.83
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 5/31/24 79,320.83 Payments Issued 6/6/2024 Total: 79,320.83
Payments Issued 6/3/2024 Total: 4,793,020.12
WORKFORCE INTEGRITY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, WALLIS RANCH PARK MARCH 2024 942.21 WORKFORCE INTEGRITY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, WALLIS RANCH PARK APR 2024 1,833.54 WING YEE LAM CPA LICENSE RENEWAL 280.00
WING YEE LAM CREDIT CARD READER TEST TRANS. 2/6/24 & 4/4/24 3.00 WILLDAN ENERGY SOLUTIONS BLDG ELECTRIFICATION & CODE ASSISTANCE DEC 2023 7,234.00 WILLIAM P. WALSH JR THE SKY KINGS SUMMER CONCERT SERIES 2024 2,500.00 VERTIGIS ANNUAL GEOCORTEX GIS MAINTENANCE SOFTWARE 6,497.00 WHITEWATER WEST INDUSTRIES LTD WAVE SLIDE AND AQUA PLAY STRUCTURE REPAIR SERVICE 59,893.40 VALERIE DEAM MC GRATH IRISH DANCERS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,461.60 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES FUEL APRIL 2024 21,731.16 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC SEPTIC TANK SERVICES JUNE 2024 726.38 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY FY2024 POLICE SERVICES CONTRACT 4,343,315.55 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY RETURN ASSET SEIZURE FUND-CASE: D20-00836 4,034.84 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL FY23/24 FIELD AND SHELTER SERVICES 67,153.15 TOMMY COOK MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2024 16.88
SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MRP STORMWATER INSPECTIONS FEB 2024 411.00 SWA GROUP JORDAN RANCH NEIGHBORHOOD SQ DESIGN MAR 2024 28,423.50 SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MRP STORMWATER INSPECTIONS JAN 2024 991.75 SHALINI REDDY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - MAY 2024 53.87
SQUAD SPORTS INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,042.20
SELECT IMAGING PRINTING & MAILING OF BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWALS 8,155.94 SHADEUSA WAVE UMBRELLA REPAIRS 2,478.41
SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC POOL SAFETY SIGNAGE 45.37
ROBERT HALF STAFFING SUPPORT - FINANCE DEPT 1,416.00
RON HSI TRI-VALLEY AIKIDO REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 402.00
REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. DPS TOXICOLOGY SERVICES 651.68 QUENCH USA, INC. WATER SERVICES D073045 JUNE 2024 1,622.62 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - SHANNON - MAY 2023 73.30 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - CORP YARD - MAY 2023 49.71 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - WAVE - MAY 2023 78.55 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - SENIOR - MAY 2023 77.45 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES PSC MAY 2024 50.36 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - CIVIC - MAY 2023 89.69 PRO CYCLES LLC POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 2,458.65 441
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 3 of 8 ends

6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/12/2024
6/17/2024 4LEAF INC. BUILDING INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW MAY 2024 63,984.00 Payments Issued 6/12/2024 Total: 1,854,272.72
WILLDAN HOMELAND SOLUTIONS ENERGY EFFICIENCY/INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS 537,932.16 WORLD CUP SOCCER CAMPS CLINICS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 7,318.80 WEE HOOP, INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,260.00
VERIZON WIRELESS WARRENT SEARCH RETURN CASE #24312768 50.00 VALERIE DEAM MC GRATH IRISH DANCERS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,944.00 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS THE WAVE POOL CHEMICALS 1,590.25
UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - MAY 2024 12,152.40 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ERP SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION 11,200.00 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC GRANT STRATEGY AND WRITING SERVICES 5,000.00 STARSPORTS PCS SPORTS EQUIPMENT - SOFTBALLS 2,145.43
THE SOURCING GROUP, LLC DPS PROMOTIONAL ITEMS FOR COMMUNITY EVENTS 4,727.34 SQUAD SPORTS INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4,285.66
SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC FILE 2399 COPIER SUPPLY TONER CARTIDGE 16.54 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC PLAN REVIEW SERVICES MAY 2024 490.00 ROBERT HALF STAFFING SUPPORT - FINANCE DEPT 2,832.00
SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC FILE 2399 COPIER SUPPLY AND SERVICE AGREEMENT 2,575.23 PRO CYCLES LLC POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 381.43 RAJBIIR SINGH RR PIZZA INC OFF SEASON BIRTHDAY PIZZA - THE WAVE 02/04-04/28 2,097.78 PLEASANTON EVENT RENTALS INC LINEN CLEANING FOR PCS RENTALS PROGRAM 679.15 PLEASANTON VIP SENIOR CLUB SENIOR CENTER HARD ROCK CASINO TRIP 545.00 PARKWAY BODY SHOP POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 3,289.76 MINUTEMAN PRESS PROMOTIONAL POSTCARDS - SENIOR CENTER 365.66 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES PLAN REVIEW FEB 2024 1,092.50 747.24
HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES WAVE SUMMER OPENING 600.00 MCE CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES APR 2024 573,002.41 MAKE ME A PRO SPORTS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 3,471.00
LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON UMPIRES ASSOCIATION OFFICIATING SERVICES FOR PCS SPORTS PROGRAMS 2,540.00 LYNX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. GIS CONSULTING SERVICES, APR & MAY 2024 12,225.00 LANLOGIC INC. OPEN DNS SOFTWARE JUNE 2024 1,050.00
LEHR AUTO DPS EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT & INSTALLATION FOR D22 28,686.18 EOA, INC. EVIRON & SUS DIVISION PLAN REVIEW DEC 2023 2,489.00 EVERPRO KIDS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,313.40
ENGIE SERVICES U.S. INC. SOLAR MAINT. CIVIC, LIBRARY, SHANNON MAY 2024 61,436.00 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR EAN SERVICES, LLC DPS SPECIAL INVESTIGATIVE UNIT 2,382.36 EAST BAY POOL SERVICE, INC. POOL MAINTENANCE AT THE WAVE - MAY 10,500.00 L.N. CURTIS AND SONS DPS UNIFORMS 42.94
LANLOGIC INC. 24/7 WAN INTERFACE MONITORING JUNE 2024 637.50 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 3,975.00
JCJCJ, INC ADOPT A BENCH PROGRAM PLAQUE 736.50
GUIDA ENGINEERING SERVICES PLAN REVIEW MAY 2024
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. BRIDGE & STRUCTURE ASSET INSPECTION TRAINING APR 2024 2,384.50 DSRSD SERVICE TO 5/31/2024 229,175.61
CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 DPS FIRST AID RESTOCK 63.03
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES PLAN REVIEW APRIL 2024 2,844.00 CARBONIC SERVICE THE WAVE POOL CHEMICALS 349.87
CHARGE POINT, INC. CHARGEPOINT ANNUAL SERVICE AND MAINT JUN 2024 26,876.35 BLUETOAD, INC. SUMMER ACTIVITY GUIDE OVERAGES 12.00
C. OVERAA & CO. CIVIC CENTER 2ND FLOOR RENOVATION 246,928.12 BKF ENGINEERS PROWAG REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS APR 2024 910.00 BKF ENGINEERS PROWAG REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS MAY 2024 2,590.00 ALPHA MEDIA LLC KKIQ/KUIC/KKKDV KKIQ WAVE RADIO ADVERTISEMENT AND LIVE EVENTS MAY 2024 1,700.00 AKSHAY ARORA ARORA TENNIS & FITNESS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 30,633.62 442
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 4 of 8 ends

6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
CITYSERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT - SENIOR STABILIZATION 8,022.50 CODE FOR FUN REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 598.50
CHS CONSULTING GROUP PARKING DEMAND ASSESSMENT FOR DOWNTOWN DUBLIN 8,469.00 CITYSERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT -HOMELESSNESS 12,397.50 CHRISTINE PETIT REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 715.20
CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COLLEGE DST FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT - PATHWAYS 15,795.00 CATHERYN M GRIER PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00
CDW GOVERNMENT INC SOLARWIND LICENSE UPGRADE 1,715.52
CARBONIC SERVICE THE WAVE POOL CHEMICALS 325.82
CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS INSTRUCTOR SERVICES AGREEMENT 897.00 CALLANDER ASSOCIATES INC. WALLIS RANCH PARK DESIGN SERVICES APR 2024 4,950.47 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 700.00 CALED CA ASSN FOR LOCAL ECON DEV CALED ACE RECERTIFICATION DUES 150.00 CALEHS ATTN: JOE MOULTON LIBRARY SPCC PLAN / TRAINING JUNE 2024 3,100.00 BPXPRESS BID SETS FOR 2024 CAPE SEAL PROJECT 303.00
BRINKS, INC. ARMORED CAR SERVICE JUNE 2024 314.72
BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF THE CIVIC CNTR CLOCKTOWER 4,500.00 AZCO SUPPLY TRAFFIC COMM MODULE 804.83
BIG O'TIRES #7 POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 701.36 AT&T - CALNET 3 SHANNON CENTER ALARM 9391063350 05/12/2024 29.12 AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CIVIC FIRE ALARM 06/01/2024 56.69 AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CIVIC FIRE ALARM 05/01/2024 56.45 AT&T - CALNET 3 HERITAGE 9391018979 05/14/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 HERITAGE CENTER BACKUP 05/06/2024 61.69 AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO PSC 05/01/2024 111.77
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CIVIC 05/27/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 CLARK AVE 05/27/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO SHANNON FAX 05/27/2024 29.12 AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO FS16 5/27/2024 56.69
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO ELEVATOR 111.27
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO FS2-3 05/26/2024 341.24
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CY 05/14/2024 234.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO BLDG INSP 05/14/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO FSP FAX 05/14/2024 56.69
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO FS18 05/14/2024 84.25
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CY FAX 05/14/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO PSC FIRE ALARM 05/14/2024 56.69 AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO LIBRARY 911 5/14/2024 29.12
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CY 05/14/2024 33.17
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO SR ALARM 05/12/2024 198.54
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO CIVIC 05/12/2024 111.70
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO WAVE 05/12/24 111.81
AT&T - CALNET 3 SERVICE TO 800 05/12/2024 0.03
ALAMEDA COUNTY LAFCO ALAMEDA COUNTY LAFCO COST 4,900.00 AMY'S ENGRAVED SIGNS & AWARDS NAME PLATE - CODE ENFORMENT OFFICER 183.29 AKSHAY ARORA ARORA TENNIS & FITNESS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 5,670.00 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP TO4 ALL WAY STOP WARRNT. & CROSSWLK ANALYS. MAR 2024 3,432.50 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT SVCS MAR 2024 647.50 ADVANCED INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PEST MANAGEMENT MAY 2024 4,228.80 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP ANNUAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM SUPPORT MARCH 2024 1,387.50 ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCTS DPS TECHNICIAN SHIRTS 182.47
ADITYA T. BABU CLUB V.I.P. VOLLEYBALL REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4,794.00 A4 PROMOTIONS & INCENTIVES PCS PROMOTIONAL POSTERS 505.49 A4 PROMOTIONS & INCENTIVES WAVE SIGNAGE SUPPLIES 574.60 54 ELECTRIC WAVE SPEAKERS, AMP REPLACE AND REWIRE AND TRAINING 16,577.82 CHABOT-LAS POSITAS COLLEGE DST FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT - VITA SERVICE 15,795.00 443
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 5 of 8 ends

6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. EXT. PAINTING CITY FACILITIES CONSTR. MAY 2024 690.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. IHT BRIDGE PROJECT MANAGEMENT MAY 2024 10,290.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. CONSTRUCTION MGMT-DON BIDDLE COMM PARK APR 2024 5,640.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. CONSTRUCTION MGMT-DON BIDDLE COMM PARK MAY 2024 8,400.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAY 2024 3,670.00 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. INSP SERVICES FOR REGIONAL ST CROSSWALK MAY 2024 2,965.00 NOOR KAUR DHARNI PAYROLL CHECK REPLACEMENT 51.13
NOVANI, LLC. ANNL MAINT SUPPT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SERVER NET APR 2024 1,002.13 NICHOLAS OCHOA PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00
NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD DESIGN SVCS-IRON HORSE NATURE PARK APR 2024 11,972.70 MINUTEMAN PRESS 2024 SLURRY SEAL NOTICES 1,064.63
MNS ENGINEERS, INC. IRON HORSE TRAIL BRIDGE AT DUBLIN BLVD FEB 2024 20,627.69 MATTHEW AINI PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00
MICHAEL BAKER INT'L, INC. AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE MAY 2024 2,465.00 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES FOR MAY 2024 32.96 MARK THOMAS & COMPANY, INC. IRON HORSE TRAIL CROSSING DESIGN SVCS APR 2024 781.36 KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. BIKE SHARE PROGRAM ANALYS. & SUPPORT APR 2024 780.00 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. DESIGN SERVICES - SLIDES REPAIR APR 2024 21,011.00 KINDERMUSIK W/ MS LINDSAY & FRIENDS, INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 2,074.80 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. DESIGN SERVICES - SLIDES REPAIR MAR 2024 30,113.76 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL APRIL 2024 12,039.19 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4,485.00
IVAN SAN PEDRO MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MAY 2024 54.00
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC REAL ESTATE CONSULTING FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS APRIL/MAY 2,440.00 INTERACTIVE DATA, LLC DPS SOCIAL MEDICA SEARCH SOFTWARE - MAY 2024 580.50 INCREDIFLIX, INC REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 5,505.00
HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOC SALES TAX AUDIT CONSULTING (APRIL - JUNE 2024) 4,628.45 IMAGE SALES, INC. CITY BADGE ACCESS CARDS 599.58
HAPPY LITES, LLC CIVIC CENTER PERMANENT LED LIGHTS 39,512.00 HD SUPPLY CONST & INDUSTRIAL POWER CORDS FOR POWER SHUTDOWN 107.04 HALEY & ALDRICH, INC STAFF AUGMENTATION APRIL 2024 1,887.50 HALEY & ALDRICH, INC STAFF AUGMENTATION MARCH 2024 3,237.50 HALEY & ALDRICH, INC STAFF AUGMENTATION JULY 2023 181.25 HALEY & ALDRICH, INC STAFF AUGMENTATION JAN 2024 2,725.00 GURUS EDUCATION EAST BAY REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 2,460.07
GTL LEASING, LLC HYDROGEN FUEL CYLINDERS LEASE APR 2024 1,332.00 GTL LEASING, LLC HYDROGEN FUEL CYLINDERS LEASE DEC 2023 6,660.00 FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION FUNDING PLAN 3,654.00 GTL LEASING, LLC HYDROGEN FUEL CYLINDERS LEASE MAR 2024 6,660.00 FASTSIGNS BRAY COMMUNITY ROOM LETTERING 276.15
FELICIA ESCOVER CALED CONF 2024 EMP REIMBURSEMENT 24.78 DREAM RIDE ELEVATOR ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE MAY 2024 516.00 EVERYTHING GROWS INTERIOR LANDSCAPING INTERIOR PLANT MAINTENANCE MAY2024 372.81 DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA DELTA DENTAL PREMIUM - MAY 2024 13,430.62 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACCTNG OFFICE- LIVESCAN FEES 740.00 DANIEL E. KEEN CITY MANAGER EVALUATION 10,700.00
DANIEL S COLLEY PCS COMMISSION 5/20/24 50.00
CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. STREET STUDY -DUBLIN BL. APR 2024 2,137.00 CUBIC ITS, INC. FY24/25 ATMS AND SYNCHRO GREEN MAINT. MAY2024 25,600.00 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. PLANNING & PRELIMINARY ENG VILLAGE PKWY FEB 2024 2,737.50 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. STREET STUDY -DUBLIN BL. MARCH 2024 1,036.00 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. MARTIN CANYON CREEK SILVERGATE DR FEB 2024 8,552.00 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR ASSESSOR MAP UPDATES 12.00 CPS HR CONSULTING TRAINING ADMIN RETREAT 3,825.00
COMCAST COUNCIL AV ROOM BUSINESS CABLE 5/18-6/17/2024 99.16 CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. KOOPMAN CANYON CREEK CHANNEL AND BANK REPAIR APR 2024 9,102.75 444
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 6 of 8 ends

6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING CIVIC MAY 2024 1,308.00 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING HERITAGE MAY 2024 98.00 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING WAVE MAY 2024 736.42 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING SENIOR MAY 2024 720.17 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING SHANNON MAY 2024 1,244.25 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING CIVIC MAY 2024 1,390.02 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING LIBRARY MAY 2024 2,669.34 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. JANITORIAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES APRIL 2024 7,987.00 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES APRIL 2024 5,273.93 THE SOURCING GROUP, LLC DPS PROMOTIONAL ITEMS FOR COMMUNITY EVENTS 508.49 T-MOBILE USA, INC. CELL PHONE SERVICES THROUGH 05/20/2024 667.31 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING PLAN/CONSTR REVIEW CULTURAL ARTS CENTER APR 2024 73,306.00 THE CITIES GROUP A JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY WORKERS' COMP ASSESSMENT 672.37 STANFORD HEALTH -VALLEYCARE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL TEST FEES 333.00 STEPHEN WRIGHT PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00
SQUAD SPORTS INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,720.80
SIGN SOURCE OF CHARLESTON LLC SIGNAGE FOR THE WAVE 438.75 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC SIMPLER SOFTWARE LICENSING SUPPORT 1,500.00 SELECT IMAGING NAME PLATE & BADGE - MAYOR 104.88
SHIR MARTIAL ARTS EMPOWER MARTIAL ARTS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 250.60 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS MAY 2024 3,368.25 RROOAR REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 2,908.80
RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLAN REVIEW FEB 2024 2,631.00 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP ENGINEERING SERVICES - PLAN REVIEW MARCH 2024 1,373.50 RENATA FLECCHIA TYLER PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00 ROBERT FERGUSON ROB'S SKATE ACADEMY REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 567.00 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. POSTAGE FEES FOR MAY 7900 0444 5825 3931 4,506.03 PRISCILLA A BARTON REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 675.00
PLAN JPA GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS - APRIL 2024 67.50
PLEASANTON VIP SENIOR CLUB CHINATOWN WALKING TOUR - SENIOR CENTER 945.00 PG&E A6 SERVICE TO FS18 05/12/2024 398.02
PG&E B6 SERVICE TO LIBRARY 04/30/2024 2,294.54
PG&E LS2-A SERVICE TO AVELLINA 05/13/2024 186.03
PG&E SERVICE TO PSC 05/14/2024 4,230.36
PG&E SERVICE TO SR CTR 05/12/2024 1,657.30
PG&E SERVICE TO WAVE 5/06/2024 26,550.98
PG&E LS2-A SERVICE TO CENTRAL 05/15/2024 4.87
PG&E LS2-A SERVICE TO EAST DUBLIN 04/16/2024 14,960.33
PG&E B1 SERVICE TO VARIOUS 1997-1 05/12/2024 37.56
PG&E LS2-A SERVICE TO ARN & MART 05/15/2024 104.29
PG&E TC1 SERVICE TO FALLON 05/13/2024 154.18
PG&E TC1 SERVICE TO 3544 DB 05/13/2024 142.32
PG&E TC1 SERVICE TO TASSAJARA 05/09/2024 131.78
PG&E SERVICE TO VARIOUS TC 04/12/2024 11,682.95
PG&E A6 SERVICE TO FS17 05/06/2024 277.24
PG&E TC1 SERVICE TO DB 05/06/2024 108.27
PG&E B1 ART LIGHT 7401 DUBLIN BLVD 05/01/2024 298.75
PG&E SERVICE TO PSC 05/14/2024 870.05
PG&E VAR PARK IRRIGATION 05/07/2024 3,577.82
PG&E B6 SERVICE TO BRAY CMMN 05/12/2024 113.33
PG&E B6 SERVICE TO FSP 05/06/2024 6,926.63
PG&E B10S SERVICE TO EGP 05/29/2024 4,076.14
PG&E 6196 HORIZON PKWY M DONBIDDLE 05/15/2024 775.68
PG&E LS2-A EAST DUBLIN 05/15/2024 21,753.82
PARKWAY BODY SHOP POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 2,264.58 PG&E IRRIGATION SERVICE TO 05/01/2024 289.80
445
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 7 of 8 ends

6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/17/2024
6/20/2024
6/20/2024
6/21/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. DOWNTOWN PUBLIC ART PRE-DESIGN 510.00 LANLOGIC INC. INSTALLATION & CABLING CIVIC AND SHANNON CENTER 25,088.50 JOY LIU FAMILY CAMPOUT PHOTOGRAPHY AND VIDEOGRAPHY 360.00 JULIA H. TOMTANIA HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 I C M A 457 PLAN DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 6/14/24 35,314.24 IRON MOUNTAIN POLICE RECORDS STORAGE 372.67
HEALTHEQUITY, INC. HEALTHEQUITY: PE 6/14/24 4,828.66
I C M A 401 PLAN DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 6/14/24 1,284.76 HARRELL HARRIS PHOTOGRAPHY 2024 SUMMER CAMP PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES 1,200.00 HDL COREN & CONE PROPERTY TAX CONSULTING SERVICES APR-JUN 2024 1,997.93 GINA MARIE GARCIA-GABRIELL HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 GOLDEN STATE FLEET SVCS INC DPS TOWING SERVICE 125.00
FRANCISCO & ASSOCIATES, INC. CFD 2015-1 AUDIT SERVICES JUN 2024 13,505.00 DENALECT ALARM COMPANY QUARTERLY ALARM CHARGE 363.00
EUROPEAN MOBILE WERKS POLICE VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 1,177.00 DARREN PHILLIPS HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 DELL MARKETING L.P. C/O DELL USA L.P. DPS DESKTOP SETUP 4,014.66 COMMUNITY RESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 3,198.51 CONTRA COSTA CO DA'S OFFICE RETURN ASSET SEIZURE - D21-01168 44,839.71 CINTAS CORPORATION NO.2 DPS FIRST AID RESTOCK 72.91
CENTRO LEGAL FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 2,145.27
CARBONIC SERVICE THE WAVE POOL CHEMICALS 286.97
CASTRO VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,255.80 BPXPRESS CAMP PARKS SIGN PROJECT 676.85
CALIFORNIA BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY, INC. NAVIGATOR PROGRAM CONSULTING SERVICES 2,750.00 BIG O'TIRES #7 POLICE VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 233.95 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP EAST BAY LEGAL NOTICE MAY 2024 2,100.05 BELES & BELES, LLP RETURN ASSET SEIZURE - D21-01168 15,658.00 ANGEL HOUZE CLAY ART C/O JULIE P. KARTONO REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,200.00 AZCO SUPPLY TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROLLERS JUNE 2024 20,958.53 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC CROSSING GUARD SERVICES SUMMER SCHOOL 5/26/24-6/8/24 218.56 ALLISON KELLY PASCHAL-HUNTER HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 ALAMEDA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ATTN: FIRE SERVICES FY23-24 MAR 2024 1,628,632.16 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS INC CROSSING GUARD SERVICES 5/26/24-6/8/24 7,902.58 ALAMEDA COUNTY CLERK 2024 DUBLIN TREE RESTORATION GRANT CLERK FEE 50.00 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 6/14/24 24,883.55 Payments Issued 6/21/2024 Total: 24,883.55
Payments Issued 6/20/2024 Total: 185,290.08
CAL PERS PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 6/14/24 101,973.10
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 6/14/24 83,316.98 Payments Issued 6/17/2024 Total: 733,548.01
WORKFORCE INTEGRITY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, CWA COMPLIANCE FOR DAC MAY 2024 1,811.88 WORLD CUP SOCCER CAMPS CLINICS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 2,177.26 WORKFORCE INTEGRITY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, IRON HORSE NATURE PARK-CWA ADMIN APR 2024 1,417.67 WORKFORCE INTEGRITY & TRAINING SOLUTIONS, CWA COMPLIANCE FOR DAC APR 2024 2,271.58 WARREN PAYLADO REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,775.40
WEE HOOP, INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 2,256.00
VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) VISION INSURANCE PREMIUM - MAY 2024 2,161.15 WAHIDA I. RASHID PLANNING COMMISSION 6/11/2024 50.00
VERIZON WIRELESS DATA PLAN FOR LICENSE PLATE READERS 2,515.88 VANESSA MEDVE REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 1,947.00
VANESSA THOMAS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 500.00
UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES & SUPPLY CO. WINDOW & CARPET CLEANING WAVE MAY 2024 1,744.00 446
City of Dublin
Payment Issuance Report
Print Date: 7/1/2024
Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024

Page 8 of 8 ends

6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
6/25/2024
Total Number of Payments Issued: 306
Grand Total for Payments Dated 6/1/2024 through 6/30/2024: 14,352,606.97 Payments Issued 6/25/2024 Total: 6,455,275.03
WORLD CUP SOCCER CAMPS CLINICS REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4,400.40 VERIZON WIRELESS WARRENT SEARCH RETURN CASE #24359225 50.00 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT BUILDING PLAN REVIEW FOR MAY 2024 12,029.00 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. JANITORIAL SERVICES JUNE 2024 22,884.36 US BANK - PARS PARS: PE 6/14/24 10,096.43
TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. JANITORIAL SRVCES & SUPPLIES - CAMP PARKS JUNE 2024 32,069.31 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL & PLNG COMM MTGS 1,249.83 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN FOR WOMEN FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 14,399.41 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR MAY 2024 38,186.00 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY FY2024 POLICE SERVICES CONTRACT 4,381,263.14 TIMEA IHAROSI HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 THE SOURCING GROUP, LLC PCS DEPARTMENT APPAREL - UNIFORMS 23/24 2,442.80 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. FY 23-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 2,905.52 SQUAD SPORTS INC. REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 4,158.60
SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. INSTALL MILITARY BANNERS 702.00
SMART WAVE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC DOWNTOWN WI-FI ANNUAL SUPPORT 14,036.00 SHWETA AGRAWAL HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION 06/13/24 50.00 SIERRA DISPLAY, INC. CHANGE OUT BANNERS TO SUMMER FUN 546.00 SELECT IMAGING WARNING SIGNS FOR FIREWORKS BOOTHS 113.39 SELECT IMAGING CODE ENFORCEMENT SHIRTS AND JACKET 173.73 S & S WORLDWIDE INC AFTER SCHOOL RECREATION SUPPLIES 2,608.03 SELECT IMAGING NAMETAG FOR PARKS COMMISSION 20.56
REDWOOD PUBLIC LAW, LLP FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THROUGH APR 24 45,084.45 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. DPS - TOXICOLOGY SERVICES 1,205.70 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS17 JUNE 2024 259.60 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS18 JUNE 2024 204.30 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - CORP YARD JUNE 2024 49.71 RAYNE OF SAN JOSE WATER SOFTENER SERVICES FS16 JUNE 2024 236.90 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - SENIOR JUNE 2024 77.45 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - SHANNON JUNE 2024 73.30 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - CIVIC JUNE 2024 89.69 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - WAVE JUNE 2024 78.55 PLEASANTON EVENT RENTALS INC LINEN CLEANING FOR PCS RENTALS PROGRAM 245.80 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAT SERVICES - PSC JUNE 2024 50.36 OPEN HEART KITCHEN FY 2023-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 7,509.01 PARTNERS FOR CHANGE TRI-VALLEY FY 2023-24 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT 2,296.00 M-GROUP PLANNING SERVICES - BOULEVARD PH 1-5 3,070.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS BANNER FOR DAC 324.57
LANLOGIC INC. WIFI ACCESS POINT INSTALLATION 27,361.36
LSA ASSOCIATES INC. CEQA DOCUMENT PREP FOR DUBLIN FALLON 580 PROJECT 102.50 447

STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL

Page 1 of 14 ends

Agenda Item 6.1
DATE: July 16, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Dublin Fallon 580 Project (PLPA-2023-00033)
Prepared by: Crystal De Castro, Senior Planner and Hazel Wetherford, Deputy City Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The City Council will consider a request by GH PacVest, LLC for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project. The proposal includes eliminating the Public/Semi-Public land use designation, converting 42.6 acres designated Open Space to Parks/Public-Recreation, establishing development standards for the future development of 238 residential units and up to 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/campus office use, and subdividing the 192-acre site into 11 parcels. Requested approvals include a General Plan and EDSP Amendment, Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment, Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential use, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8663, 8666, and 8667, and a Development Agreement. The City Council will also consider an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct a public hearing, deliberate, and:
1) Adopt a Resolution Adopting an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports and Adopting General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments to Eliminate the 2.5-Acre Public/Semi-Public Land Use Designation and to Convert Approximately 42.6 Acres of Open Space to the Parks/Public Recreation Land Use Designation; 2) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving Amendments to the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Ordinance No. 32- 05 and a Stage 2 Development Plan for 13.7-Acres of Medium-High Density Residential for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project;
3) Adopt a Resolution Approving the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project; and
4) Waive the reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and GH PacVest, LLC Related to the Dublin Fallon 580 Project.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:
448

Page 2 of 14 ends

All costs associated with the processing of this application are paid for by the applicant.

DESCRIPTION:

Background
The Dublin Fallon 580 property is located within the Fallon Village area in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP). The property extends north of I-580 to Jordan Ranch, east from Fallon Road to just beyond Croak Road. The project site has a band of low-lying hills along the upper third of the site and slopes down to I-580 where the property is generally flat. No grading has occurred to date and there are no existing structures. The site is generally surrounded by existing and future residential uses and Cottonwood Creek School to the north, commercial to the west and future residential, commercial, and industrial uses to the east as shown in Figure 1 and Table 1 below.

Figure 1. Location Map
449

Page 3 of 14 ends

Table 1. Surrounding Uses
Location Zoning General Plan Land Use Current Use of Property North Planned
Development
(PD)
Medium High Density Residential
Public/Semi-Public
Parks/Public Recreation
Townhomes, Future
Neighborhood Square,
Cottonwood Creek Park and
Cottonwood Creek School
South -- -- I-580/City of Pleasanton
East PD Medium-Density Residential
Industrial Park
General Commercial/Campus Office
Vacant Land
West PD Medium Density Residential
Parks/Public Recreation
Public/Semi-Public
General Commercial
Irongate Neighborhood,
Sunrise Nature Park, DSRSD
Utility, Falllon Gateway
Shopping Center
The project site has General Plan and EDSP land use designations of Medium-High Density Residential, General Commercial/Campus Office, Park/Public Recreation, Open Space, and Public/Semi-Public as shown in Figure 2 below.

Figure 2. GH PacVest Existing Land Uses
On May 18, 2021, the City Council approved a Fallon East Economic Development Zone (EDZ) and 450

Page 4 of 14 ends

incentives package for properties east of Fallon Road along the Dublin Boulevard Extension, including the project site. The EDZ encourages investments in targeted industry sectors prioritized by the City Council, including “Med-Tech” and “Bio-Tech” companies and startups.

On September 5, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 101-23, approving the initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to evaluate eliminating the 2.5-acre Public/Semi-Public land use designation and converting the Open Space land use designation to Parks/Public Recreation and proposed Development Agreement Deal Terms.

Proposed Project
The Applicant has requested approval of the following:
 An amendment to the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan to eliminate the Public/Semi-Public land use designation and convert 42.6 acres designated as Open Space to Parks/Public Recreation.
 An amendment to an existing Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan for the future development of 238 residential units and approximately 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/campus office use.
 A Stage 2 Development Plan to establish development regulations for the residential use.  Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667 to subdivide the 192-acre site into 11 parcels to accommodate proposed residential, commercial/campus office, parks, and open space use.
 A Development Agreement.

There is no development proposed at this time. A Site Development Review Permit is required for any future development with approval by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. Table 2 provides a comparison of existing and proposed land use designations and proposed development densities.
451

Page 5 of 14 ends

Table 2. EDSP Existing and Proposed Land Use Designations and Densities Existing Proposed
Land Use Designation Gross
Acres1
Density
Range
Gross Acres1 Density
Medium-High Density Residential 13.7 14.1-25
du/ac
(193-342
units)

13.7 17.4 du/ac
(238 units)
General Commercial/Campus
Office
126.3 .20-.80 FAR
(1,101,196 -
4,404,787
SF)
126.25 .20-.80 FAR
(1,101,196 -
4,404,787
SF) 2
Parks/Public Recreation
(Community Park)

7.2 7.22
Parks/Public Recreation (Nature
Community Park)
-- 42.59
Open Space 44.9 2.28
Public/Semi-Public3 2.5 30 du/ac
(74 units)
0 Total 192.11 192.04
1Acreages from prior General Plan, Specific Plan, and PD1 approvals were based on assumed boundary limits.

Proposed Acreages reflected in this application have been updated to match resolved boundary survey data dated January 2017. [Note the discrepancy in total acreages] 2The Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for this proposed project studied a development capacity of 0.6 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (3,299,670 SF).
3The Public/Semi-Public is an overlay designation and does not add to the total acres.

It is important to note that the proposed project is not increasing the amount of allowable residential units or commercial square footage from what was previously identified for this area under the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.

Analysis
General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments On September 5, 2023, the City Council authorized the initiation of a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment Study (Resolution 101-23) to eliminate the 2.5-acre Public/SemiPublic land use designation and convert approximately 42.6 acres of Open Space to Park/Public Recreation on the project site. The following is a discussion of those proposed amendments.

Public/Semi-Public Land Use
The Fallon Village project originally envisioned a mixed-use commercial area along Central Parkway, known as the Fallon Village Center. This commercial area was to be supported by a mix of commercial, Semi-Public, and residential uses. The General Plan and EDSP assigned a 2.5-acre Semi-Public land use overlay on the Medium-High Density residential site adjacent to Cottonwood 452

Page 6 of 14 ends

Creek Park and School. The final location of this site was to be determined at the time of the Planned Development Zoning Stage 2 Development Plan. On June 15, 2021, the City Council adopted a General Plan and EDSP Amendment to change the land use designation of the 2.5 acres of this property from Semi-Public to Public/Semi-Public. This amendment allowed a broader range of uses, including the potential for affordable housing development by a non-profit entity.

However, the plan for the Fallon Village Center has changed over time and no longer includes a commercial component. The Public/Semi-Public use in this area has been achieved through designating the site for the Cottonwood Creek School; therefore, the Applicant proposes to eliminate the Public/Semi-Public land use enabling more flexibility regarding the product type proposed on the Medium-High Density Residential site. While this would not increase the overall number of units on the site, it would enable them to spread those units across a larger area, resulting in a lower density product type.

Housing Element
The 2023-2031 Housing Element identifies this site as an opportunity site that can accommodate 74 lower-income affordable units. The “No Net Loss” law prevents local governments from downzoning or eliminating opportunity sites after adopting their Housing Element without finding alternative sites within the City that can accommodate those units. The City is in coordination with the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority to support development at the Dublin Transit Center which includes a site that is already identified as an opportunity site in the Housing Element (Assessor Parcel Number 986-0034-012-00). This site has a surplus of units that can serve as an opportunity site to accommodate these 74 units. A finding in support of locating these units at the Transit Center is included in Attachment 1.

Open Space to Parks/Public Recreation
The City identified a parkland deficit of approximately 50 acres resulting from new population data from the US Census and Housing Element. The majority of this deficit is in the nature community parkland category. On September 5, 2023, the City Council amended the Dublin Municipal Code (Ordinance 05-23) to shift parkland dedication categories from Community Parkland to Nature Community Parkland to address the City’s deficit with the addition of nature parks.

The proposed conversion of Open Space to Parks/Public Recreation helps address the City’s parkland deficit by providing an additional 42.6+/- acres of Nature Community Parkland. The site will accommodate a future nature park designed for low impact use with hiking and walking trails.

As part of the proposed Development Agreement deal terms, Staff has negotiated with the Applicant to dedicate this land to the City to address the City’s parkland deficit.

The draft City Council resolution approving the General Plan Amendment (GPA) and EDSP Amendment (EDSPA) is included as Attachment 1.

Planned Development Zoning
The project site has existing Planned Development Zoning (Ordinance No. 32-05) with a Stage 1 Development Plan and a Stage 2 Development Plan (Ordinance 13-08). Among other things, the Stage 1 Development Plan established the specific residential, commercial, and campus office uses 453

Page 7 of 14 ends

that are permitted by right, conditionally permitted, and prohibited as well as the overall allowed development density and intensity. The proposed project includes an amendment to the existing Stage 1 Development Plan and approval of a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential portion of the project.

The proposed amendment to the Stage 1 Development Plan is limited to amending the land use designations to be consistent with the proposed GPA/EDSPA, design standards for retaining walls and street sections, and updating the development assumptions for the General Commercial/Campus Office area. No other changes to the Stage 1 Development Plan are proposed.

The Stage 2 Development Plan builds off the existing Stage 1 Development Plan and includes development regulations (i.e. setbacks, height, parking, etc.), architectural and landscape standards, inclusionary housing requirements, and a conceptual site plan for the residential area.

An overview of the Stage 2 Development Plan, including the Site Plan (Figure 3), is provided below.

The draft Ordinance providing details of the amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan and the proposed Stage 2 Development Plan is included as Attachment 2.

Figure 3. Planned Development Stage 2 Site Plan
Residential Development Standards
The Stage 1 Development Plan includes development standards for the Medium-High Density Residential areas and allows them to be modified through a Stage 2 Development Plan. New development standards are proposed for the Medium-High Density Residential area supporting multi-family residences of various sizes and styles. The proposed Residential Development Standards are provided in Table 3 below. A complete list of all development standards is included in the proposed Planned Development Ordinance in Attachment 2. 454

Page 8 of 14 ends

Table 3. Residential Development Standards
Criteria Medium-High Density
Product Type
Attached Product, Townhome,
Condominium
Maximum Building Height(4)(12) 40'
Maximum Stories 3
Minimum Setbacks (1)(2)(4)(6)
Front setback-Porch/Living to right of way (ROW) 5'
Rear Setback-garage to back of curb property line (P/L) 3' Rear setback-balcony/deck to back of curb P/L (2nd/3rd story) 0.5’ Side setback-Bldg end to ROW or P/L 4’
Minimum Building Separation (2)(3)(4)
Bldg. to Bldg.-Paseo (Front) 18.5’
Bldg. to Bldg.-End 10’
Bldg. to Bldg.-Garage (Rear) 30’
Minimum Drive Aisle-with Aerial Fire Access 26’
Minimum Drive Aisle-No Aerial Fire Access 22’
Parking Spaces Required Per Home (11)
2 covered, plus 1 guest parking
space for 95% of the units
Minimum Usable Private Open Space (SF) (7)
60 S.F. of private outdoor
balcony, deck, patio space with
6’ minimum dimension
Notes:
(1) Setbacks measured from property line or as otherwise noted. (2) See following “Typical Plotting Concept” exhibits for graphic depiction of above standards. (3) Items such as, but not limited to air conditioning condensers, porches, chimneys, bay windows, retaining walls less than 4' in height, media centers, etc. may encroach 2' into the required setback of one side yard, provided a minimum of a 3' flat and level area is maintained for access around the house. (4) Setbacks are subject to Building Code requirements for access. (5) Maximum height of a front yard courtyard wall shall be 30" maximum (solid wall) or 42" maximum (transparent/fence).
(6) Patios / Private outdoor open space may encroach into the Front or Side Setback by up to 3’. (7) Retaining walls up to 4' high may be used to create a level usable area. Retaining walls in excess of 4' to create usable area are subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director.

Retaining walls over 30" in height are subject to safety criteria as determined by the Building Official. (8) Curbside parking may be counted toward required number of guest spaces. Two covered side-by-side spots shall be provided. Tandem spaces may not be utilized to meet the parking requirement. (9) Accessory Structure Setbacks will follow the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 8.40: Accessory Structures and Uses Regulations.
(10) A low wall (30" or less) may encroach into the site line area. No solid structure above 30" shall be allowed; porch columns excluded.
455

Page 9 of 14 ends

(11) Adjustments to the parking requirements shall be subject to Dublin Municipal Code 8.76.05. (12) Refer to Dublin Municipal Code 8.36.110 for height exceptions.

Architectural and Landscape Guidelines
The architectural and landscape guidelines provided in the Stage 2 Development Plan provide the framework for future Site Development Review Permits. The architectural and landscape guidelines are based on the Design Guidelines and Master Neighborhood Landscaping Plan in the Stage 1 Development Plan and aim to promote well designed and attractive development.

The proposed architectural guidelines for the residential area focus on the following proposed architectural styles: Traditional Farmhouse, Modern Farmhouse, Contemporary, Contemporary Spanish, and Modern French Country. The residential guidelines seek to develop an interesting mix of plans and elevation styles and to ensure balanced and varied streetscapes. To achieve this, requirements for varied elevations, colors, and massing are included as well as criteria for building form and articulation, roof, window, and door details, garage design and placement, and building materials and finishes. The architectural guidelines are included as Attachment 3.

The proposed landscape guidelines are intended to complement and enhance project architecture throughout the development. The emphasis for the Dublin Fallon 580 property is to create a welldesigned development through choices and arrangement of materials, colors, and textures. The overall landscape theme provides vibrant, flowering plant material that complements architecture and provides seasonal color while encouraging pedestrian access and connectivity to and from adjacent uses and activities. The landscape design guidelines are included as Attachment 4.

Inclusionary Zoning Regulations
The Zoning Ordinance requires the Planned Development Zoning address the provisions for inclusionary housing. The proposed Stage 2 Development Plan requires the future residential project to comply with the then current Inclusionary Zoning Regulations, as does the Development Agreement. The draft Ordinance adopting the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan is included as Attachment 2.

Vesting Tentative Tract Maps
The proposed project includes a request for Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667. Map No. 8663 would subdivide the 192-acre project site into 11 parcels, while Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8666 (Parcel 7) and 8667 (Parcel 8) would create the residential parcels, as shown in Table 4 below:

Table 4. Overview of Parcels
Parcel Parcel Size
(acres) 1
Land Use Proposed use
1 74.1 General Commercial/Campus
Office
Commercial/Office
2 17.43 General Commercial/Campus
Office
Commercial/Office
3 20.16 General Commercial/Campus Commercial/Office
456

Page 10 of 14 ends

Parcel Parcel Size
(acres) 1
Land Use Proposed use
Office
4 33.40 Park/Public Recreation Nature Community Park
5 7.22 Park/Public Recreation Community Park
6 9.19 Park/Public Recreation Nature Community Park
7 6.50 Medium-High Density
Residential
Residential
8 7.22 Medium-High Density
Residential
Residential
9 12.30 General Commercial/Campus
Office
Commercial/Office
10 2.28 Open Space Water Quality Facility for Residential Parcel
11 1.95 General Commercial/Campus
Office
Water Quality Facility for Residential
Parcel
1 The acreages from EDSP were based on assumed boundary limits. Proposed acreages reflected in this application have been updated to match resolved boundary survey data.

Access to the site is currently provided from Croak Road through Central Parkway. Once developed, primary access to the northern portion proposed for residential will be accessed through private streets from Central Parkway and the southern portion proposed for commercial/office will be accessed via the future Dublin Boulevard Extension. As part of the proposed map, a portion of the property would be dedicated for the future extension of Dublin Boulevard located north of Parcel 1 and 3. The dedication includes up to 200+/- feet of right-ofway plus a 10-foot public service easement on both the north and south side of the road, consistent with the proposed roadway improvement plans. The applicant would dedicate right of way and provide public street improvements on Pandora Way and Central Parkway to serve the residential developments. The Applicant is required to provide a 12-foot-wide access road to the Nature Community Park from Parcel 10 and Parcel 11 for City maintenance purposes. The Vesting Tentative Tract Maps and associated details are included as Attachment 6.

Development Agreement
The Applicant has requested approval of a Development Agreement for the project. The Development Agreement would provide security to the Applicant that the City will not change its zoning and other laws applicable to the project for a stated period of time. Additionally, it is a mechanism for the City to obtain commitments from the Applicant that the City might not otherwise be able to obtain. The main points are highlighted below:
 Project Grading
To accommodate the grading necessary on the property for future development, the Applicant/Property Owner can grade the entirety of the parcel prior to the construction of the Dublin Boulevard Extension. If grading has not commenced prior to the construction of the Dublin Boulevard Extension, a slope easement adjacent to the Dublin Boulevard 457

Page 11 of 14 ends

frontage shall be dedicated.
 Affordable Housing
The Applicant/Property Owner is required to satisfy its affordable housing obligation through compliance with the City’s current Inclusionary Zoning Regulations (Chapter 8.68 of the Dublin Municipal Code).
 Dublin Boulevard Right-of-Way Dedications
The Applicant/Property Owner is required to dedicate land to support the Dublin Boulevard Extension no later than three years from the approval date of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. As part of the Dublin Boulevard Extension project, the City agrees to design and construct a dedicated intersection into the project and in turn the Applicant/Property Owner agrees to reimburse the City for the direct design and paving costs.
 Community Facilities District for Service and Maintenance of Public Improvements The Applicant/Property Owner is required to cooperate with the formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) for the purpose of financing the services and maintenance of public facilities/improvements constructed by the Applicant/Property Owner. Public facilities/improvements include all public streets (including storm drain systems, streetlights, and other street appurtenances) within Parcels 7 and 8 (future residential tracts), as shown on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8663, 8666, and 8667.  Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Credits
The Development Agreement restricts the Applicant/Property Owner from using or applying any Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee (EDTIF) credits that they have purchased or transferred from any other credit-holder to satisfy the Developer’s EDTIF obligations.
 Dublin Boulevard Extension Project Mitigation
The Applicant/Property Owner is required to work with the City of Dublin to mitigate direct impacts on special status species in the areas south of the future Dublin Boulevard Extension project.
 Nature Community Parkland
The Applicant/Property Owner is required to dedicate approximately 42.6 acres of Open Space to the City for a cost of $653,400 per acre. Should the City Council approve the conversion of the Open Space land use designation to Parks/Public Recreation, the land will then serve as a Nature Community Park with hiking and walking trails. This action will help address the City’s parkland deficit.
 Public Improvements
The Applicant/Property Owner is required to complete transportation improvements, including improvements to Fallon Road, Croak Road, and the construction of new internal public and private streets.

The draft Ordinance approving the Development Agreement is included as Attachment 7 with the 458

Page 12 of 14 ends

Development Agreement itself as Attachment 8.

Consistency with the General Plan, Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance The proposed project is consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan and EDSP as proposed to be amended, and the Dublin Zoning Ordinance because the proposed zoning and land division will allow for the implementation of Parks, Open Space, Medium-High Density Residential, and General Commercial/Campus Office land uses within the project area, which has been designated for such uses.

Airport Influence Area (AIA)/Overlay Zoning District
The project site is located within the AIA/Overlay Zoning District and Airport Safety Zone 6 as provided in Chapter 8.35 of the Dublin Municipal Code. This area is designated as an area in which current or future airport-related noise, overflight, safety, and/or airspace protection factors may significantly affect land uses or necessitate restrictions on those uses. The AIA is a designation by the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission.

All permitted and conditionally permitted uses set forth in a Planned Development Zoning District that was adopted and in effect prior to August 2012 are considered to be “Existing Land Uses” pursuant to the Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). The Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission has no authority over existing land uses unless changes to an existing land use results in an increase of nonconformity with ALUCP policies. The proposed amendment to the General Plan and EDSP includes eliminating the 2.5-acre Public/Semi-Public land use designation and converting 42.60 +/- acres of Open Space to Parks/Public Recreation.

The Livermore Municipal Airport ALUCP allows Recreational Land Uses in Safety Zone 6 with no limit to intensity (people/acre). Therefore, the change in land use would be consistent with the ALUCP.

Local Transportation Analysis
The City of Dublin Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines require a Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) for all General Plan Amendments to evaluate potential impacts on the circulation network focusing primarily on local access and circulation in proximity to a project site. Per the TIA Guidelines, this analysis is required for conditions of approval and is outside the CEQA review process. Although the requested entitlements do not allow for the inclusion of conditions of approval for the commercial/office portion of the project, an LTA was completed to evaluate ultimate build out. The recommended improvements include a left turn lane at the northbound and westbound Dublin Boulevard/Fallon Road intersection and adjusting signal timing and cycle lengths at four intersections as outlined in the LTA. These improvements will be considered with future Site Development Review Permit(s). The LTA is included as Attachment 9 with the Appendices available for review on the City’s Development Activity webpage under the Dublin Fallon 580 Project: https://dublin-development.icitywork.com/.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. Prior CEQA analysis for 459

Page 13 of 14 ends

the project area includes: 1) the East Dublin General Plan and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (1993), 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002), and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs.” Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and using the City’s Initial Study Checklist, the City assessed whether any further environmental review is required for the proposed project and determined that an Addendum to the EDSP EIRs is the appropriate CEQA review. The Addendum is included as Attachment 10.

The General Commercial/Campus Office land use designation includes a FAR range of 0.20 to 0.80.

The previous environmental documents studied the potential impacts of development at an intensity of 0.28 FAR. An updated CEQA analysis was conducted with this project to include analysis of the potential impacts of development at an intensity of 0.6 FAR. The analysis found the

0.6 FAR to be consistent with the anticipated impacts (e.g., traffic and air emissions) in the previous EDSP EIRs.

PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 11, 2024. Five individuals provided public comment, two individuals in support of the project and three individuals against the project. In addition, the Planning Commission received five written comments (Attachment 11). The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 24-05 unanimously recommending the City Council approve the project (Attachment 12). The Planning Commission also recommended the City Council consider removing the Contemporary architectural style from the Planned Development Residential Guidelines because they felt it was not consistent with the surrounding development.

The City and the City’s CEQA and Traffic consultants prepared responses to the CEQA and trafficrelated comments received from the two primary written comment letters, which is included as Attachment 13. Additionally, the applicant elected to also provide a response to the comment letters, which is included as Attachment 14.

PUBLIC OUTREACH:

Three City-led Community Meetings were held on March 27, March 28, and April 3, 2024, to provide Dublin residents with information about the proposed Dublin Fallon 580 Project. In addition to Staff and the Applicant, nine residents attended the meeting on March 27; 33 residents attended on March 28; and eight residents attended on April 3. Staff provided a presentation that included an overview of the City’s development review process and the proposed project.

Questions were asked about affordable housing, traffic impacts, rodent control, off-site wetland mitigation, views, use of union labor, and the proposed Nature Community Park.

STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:

Strategy 1: Economic Development, Small Business Support, and Downtown Dublin Strategic Objective 1C: Continue supporting the Fallon-East Economic Development Zone and associated agreements that effectuate the construction of the Dublin Blvd. Extension. 460

Page 14 of 14 ends

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS:

In accordance with State law, a Public Notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property. A Public Notice was also published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. To date, the City has received some written comment on the project for this City Council hearing (Attachment 15). A Planning Application sign was posted on the project site and the project was also included on the City’s Development Projects webpage. A copy of this Staff Report was posted on the City’s website and provided to the Applicant.

ATTACHMENTS:
1) Adopting an Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Reports and Adopting General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments to Eliminate the

2.5-Acre Public/Semi-Public Land Use Designation and to Convert Approximately 42.6 Acres of Open Space to the Parks/Public Recreation Land Use Designation 2) Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map and Approving Amendments to the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Ordinance No. 32-05 and a Stage 2 Development Plan for 13.7-Acres of Medium-High Density Residential for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project
3) Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Architectural Design Guidelines 4) Exhibit B to the Ordinance - Landscape Design Guidelines 5) Resolution Approving the Vesting Tentative Maps for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project 6) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 7) Ordinance Approving a Development Agreement Between the City of Dublin and GH PacVest, LLC Related to the Dublin Fallon 580 Project
8) Exhibit A to the Ordinance - Development Agreement
9) Local Transportation Analysis
10) CEQA Analysis in Support of the Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan EIR 11) Planning Commission Public Comment Letters Received 12) Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-05
13) City response to CEQA and Traffic Impact Analysis comments 14) GH PacVest response to the CEQA and Traffic Impact Analysis comments 15) City Council Public Comment Letters
461
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 11 RESOLUTION NO. xx-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AND EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS TO ELIMINATE THE 2.5-ACRE PUBLIC/SEMIPUBLIC LAND USE DESIGNATION AND TO CONVERT APPROXIMATELY 42.6 ACRES OF

OPEN SPACE TO THE PARKS/PUBLIC RECREATION LAND USE DESIGNATION (PLPA-2023-00033)
(APNS 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-004-00, 985-0027-005-00) WHEREAS, the Property Owner, GH PacVest LLC, is requesting approval of General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, an amendment to the existing Planned Development (PD) Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan, approval of a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential use, Vesting Tentative Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667, and a Development Agreement for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project would eliminate the Public/Semi-Public land use designation and convert 42.6 acres designated Open Space to Parks/Public-Recreation, establish development standards for the future development of 238 residential units and approximately 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/campus office use. The 192-acre site would be subdivided into 11 parcels. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Fallon 580 Project” or the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the 192-acre site is located east of Fallon Road, north of I-580, and along the future Dublin Boulevard Extension; and
WHEREAS, the existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designations are Medium High Density, General Commercial/Campus Office, Parks/Public Recreation, Open Space, and Public Semi Public; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, the City Council approved the initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to evaluate 1) eliminating the “floating” 2.5-acre Public/Semi-Public land use designation and 2) converting approximately 42.6 acres Open Space land use designation to Parks/Public Recreation on the Project site; and
WHEREAS, the 2.5-acre Public/Semi-Public land use designation is an opportunity site that would accommodate 74 lower-income units subject to the “No Net Loss” provision in the 2023-2031 Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, Transit Center Site E-2 (APN 986-0034-012-00), identified in the 2023-2031 Housing Element, serves as an alternative opportunity site to accommodate the 74 lower-income units; and
WHEREAS, the conversion of approximately 42.6 acres to Parks/Public Recreation will accommodate a future Natural Community Park and address the City’s parkland deficit; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures, require that certain projects be 462
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 11 reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, prior CEQA analysis for the Project area includes: 1) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (1993), 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002), and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs;” and WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA, the City prepared a CEQA Addendum for the Project (the “Addendum”), incorporated by reference. The Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the development potential of the Project, and concludes that the Project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the EDSP EIRs and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met; and WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code, the City obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on the proposed General Plan Amendment. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation within the 90-day statutory consultation period and no further action is required under section 65352.3; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2024, the Dublin Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed project, including the Addendum to the EDSP EIRs referenced above, before taking action on the Project, and the Planning Commission did further hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove as set forth and recommended approval by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated July 16, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project for City Council including the following: 1) the General Plan Amendment/Easten Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, 2) the Planned Development Zoning District with Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, 3) the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps, 4) a Development Agreement, and 5) a CEQA Addendum; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including: 1) the proposed Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report; 2) the General Plan Amendment/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment; 3) the Planned Development Zoning with a Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan; 4) Vesting Tentative Tract Maps; and 5) a Development Agreement, on July 16, 2024, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024 the City Council considered the Addendum and all abovereferenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments, as set forth below, are in the public interest, will promote general health, safety and welfare, and that the General Plan as amended will remain internally consistent. The proposed Project is consistent with the guiding and implementing policies of the 463
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 11 General Plan in each of the Elements and will allow for a mixed-use development consisting of both residential and commercial/offices uses. The General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments noted below will ensure that the implementation of the proposed Project is in compliance with the General Plan and that each Element within the General Plan is internally consistent.

NOW BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds the elimination of the Public/Semi Public land use is in accordance with Government Code Section 65863 (No Net Loss):

A. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the Housing Element.

Consistent with Goal A and Policy 5 of the Housing Element, the City has forecasted for existing and projected housing needs and developed a buffer, by identifying alternative sites within the City, above household projections to meet existing and project needs. The Project would not reduce the amount of low-income units because an alternative site has been identified. Transit Center Site E-2 (APN 986-0034-012-00) is identified as an alternative site for the 74 low-income units and is in close proximity to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and within walking or cycling distance to places of employment, commerce, recreation, and services. The project would be in conformance with the following Housing Element Goal and Policy:

Goal A: Expand housing choice and multi-modal transportation opportunities for existing and future Dublin.

Policy A.5: Promote affordable housing opportunities adjacent to public transportation and within walking or cycling distance to places of employment, commerce, recreation, and services.

B. The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction’s share of the regional housing need at each income level and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by income level.

While the 2023-2031 Housing Element allocated 74 low-income units on the Project site, the City has identified an alternative site to relocate these units to accommodate the Total Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The City is in coordination with the Alameda County Surplus Property Authority to support development on surplus property at the Dublin Transit Center. This site, Transit Center Site E-2, has a surplus of units that can serve as an opportunity site to accommodate these 74 units. The site has a General Plan land use designation of Campus Office/High Density Residential and Planned Development Zoning that allows for Multi-Family Residential Use with an average density of 66 units per acre. As identified in the Housing Element Site Table D-9: City of Dublin 6th Cycle Housing Element Candidate Sites, Transit Center Site E2 (APN 986-0034-012-00) has a capacity of 493 units, of which 247 units are currently allocated to lower income households and 246 units to above moderate households. As provided in the table below, this alternative site can accommodate the 74 units and is adequate to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and 6558 and is consistent with the City’s projected needs for low-income households for the 2023-2031 Planning period. 464
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 4 of 11 Alternative Site: Dublin Transit Center Site E-2
Site APN General Plan Acres Net
Potential
Units
Low-Income
Units
Mod-Income
Units
Above ModIncome units
986-0034-
012-00
Campus Office/High
Density Residential

7.5 493 321 0 172
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council herby adopts the following amendments to the General Plan:

Figure 1-1 (Dublin General Plan Land Use Map) shall be amended to eliminate the 2.5-acre Public/Semi Public land use designation and convert approximately 42.6 acres of Open Space (OS) land use designation to Parks/Public Recreation (P/PR) for the project site as shown on the proposed land use map and modifications to the footnote as shown below:

The location of the Public/Semi-Public sites on the East Ranch (formerly Croak) property of Fallon Village will be determined at the time of the Stage 2 Development Plan approval. The size of the sites will be 2.0 net acres on the East Ranch property.

Table 2.2 (Land Use Development Potential: Eastern Extended Planning Area) shall be amended to reflect the change in land uses and shall read as follows:

Table 2 .2 | LAND USE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL: EASTERN EXTENDED PLANNING AREA

CLASSIFICATION ACRES INTENSITY UNITS FACTOR YIELD
RESIDENTIAL Acres Dwelling
Units/Acre
Dwelling
Units
Persons/
Dwelling
Unit
Population
High Density 52.94 25.1+ 1,328+ 2 .99 3,971+
Campus Office/ High
Density 13.92 25.1+ 715 2 .99 2,138
465
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 5 of 11 Medium-High Density 153 .61 14 .1-25 .0 2,165-3,840 2 .99 6,473- 11,482
Medium-High Density and
Retail/ Office
0 14 .1-25 .0 0 2 .99 0
Medium Density 418 .1 6 .1-14 .0 2,550-5,853 2 .99 7,625- 17,500
Single Family 725 0 .9-6 .0 652-4,350 2 .99 1,949-
13,007
Estate Residential 30 .5 0 .01-0 .8 0-24 2 .99 0-72
Rural Residential/ Agriculture 329 .8 0 .01 3 2 .7 9
TOTAL: 1,723.87 7,413-
16,113+
22,165-
48,179+
COMMERCIAL Acres Floor
Area
Ratio
(Gross)
Square Feet
(millions)
Square Feet/
Employee
Jobs
General
Commercial
194 .85 .20- .60 1 .6-5 .0 510 3,328-9,985
General
Commercial/
Campus Office
168 .57 .20- .80 1 .46-5 .87 385 3,814-
15,258
Mixed Use 0 .30-1 .00 0 490 0
Mixed Use 2/
Campus Office
22 .9 .45 max .45 260 1,731
Neighborhood
Commercial
0 .25- .60 0 490 0
Industrial Park 56 .4 .35 max .86 590 1,458
Industrial Park/
Campus Office
0 .25- .35 0 425 0
Campus Office 123 .66 .25- .80 1 .35-4 .31 260 5,179-
16,574
Campus Office/
High Density 13.921 .25- .80 .15- .49 260 583-1,866
Medical Campus 42.88 .25- .80 .46-4 .49 260 1,796-5,747 Medical Campus/
Commercial

15.85 .25- .80 .17- .41 510 338-812
TOTAL: 625.11 6.5-21.88 18,227-
53,431

PUBLIC/SEMI- PUBLIC/OPEN
SPACE
Acres Floor
Area
Ratio
(Gross)
Square Feet
(millions)
Square Feet/
Employee
Jobs
Public/Semi-Public 96.96 .50 max 2 .11 590 3,579
Semi-Public 2 .09 .50 max .045 590 77
Acres Number
466
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 6 of 11 Parks/Public
Recreation
250
Regional Parks 1.2 1
Open Space 656.96
Schools Acres Floor
Area
Ratio
(Gross)
Square Feet
(millions)
Square Feet/
Employee
Jobs
Elementary
School
38 .50 max 1 .06 590 1,797
Middle School 27 .8 .50 max .61 590 1,034
High School 23.46 .51 590 866
TOTAL: 1,098.97 5.87 7,445
Acres Dwelling
Units
Population Square Feet
(millions)
Jobs
GRAND TOTAL: 3,447.95 6,698-
15,398+
18,089-
41,578+

12.37-27.74 25,673-
60,876
1 Not included in Total as it is already accounted for under the Residential classification.

Figure 3-1 (Dublin General Plan Parks and Open Space Map) shall be amended to add the new future park designation as shown on the proposed land use map.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following amendments to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan:

Figure 4.1 (Land Use Map) shall be amended to remove the land use designation Public/SemiPublic from the GH PacVest (formerly Chen) property as follows: Note: The Natural Community Park shall be located on Parcel 4 and Parcel 6.
467
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 7 of 11 Table 4.1 (Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Land Use Summary) shall be amended to reflect the change in land area for Public/Semi Public, Parks, and Open Space and shall read as follows with no modifications to the footnotes:

TABLE 4.1

EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN

LAND USE SUMMARY
(Amendment Reso# 66-03, 47-04, 223-05, 58-07, 37-08, 210-08, 176-09, 76-10, 55-12, 92-12, 210-12, 198-13, 159-14, 101-15, 165-15, 151-16, 85-21, 14-22, 133- 22, 136-22 and xx-24)
Land Use Description LAND AREA DENSITY YIELD

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
General Commercial 252.55 acres .25-.35 FAR 2.746 MSF
General Commercial/Campus
Office****
160.37 acres .28-.60 FAR 4.191 MSF
Industrial Park* 61.3 acres .25-.28 FAR .747 MSF
Neighborhood Commercial 0 acres .30-.35 FAR .0 MSF
Mixed Use 0 acres .30-1.0 FAR .005 MSF
Mixed Use 2/Campus
Office****

25.33 acres .45 FAR .497 MSF
Campus Office 80.36 acres .35-.75 FAR 1.575 MSF
Campus Office/High Density 13.92 acres
(4)
.35-.75 FAR .265 MSF
Medical Campus 42.88 acres .25-.80 FAR .950 MSF
Medical Campus/Commercial 15.85 acres .25-.60 FAR .250 MSF Subtotal 652.56 acres 11.226 MSF

RESIDENTIAL
High Density 55.54 acres 35 du/ac 1,943 du
Campus Office/High Density 13.92 acres 66 du/ac 715 du
Medium High Density 169.31 acres 20 du/ac 3,386 du
Medium Density** 505.41 acres
(1)
10 du/ac 5,054 du
Single Family*** 947.25 acres 4 du/ac 3,789 du (3)
Estate Residential 30.4 acres 0.13 du/ac 4 du
Rural Residential/Agric. 539.55 acres .01 du/ac 5 du
Mixed Use 0 acres 15du/ac 115 du
Subtotal 2,261.38
acres
15,011 du

PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC
Public/Semi-Public 96.96 acres .24 FAR 1.01 MSF
Semi-Public 2.09 acres .25 FAR .03 MSF
Subtotal 99.05 acres 1.04 MSF

SCHOOLS
Elementary School 55.8 acres (2) 5 schools
468
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 8 of 11 Junior High School 21.3 acres 1 school
High School 23.46 acres 1 school
Subtotal 100.56 acres

PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
City Park 56.3 acres 1 park
Community Park 93.3 acres 3 parks
Neighborhood Park 50.9 acres 7 parks
Neighborhood Square 19.2 acres 7 parks
Natural Community Park 53.0 acres 2 parks
Subtotal 272.7 acres 20 parks
Open Space 641.46 acres
TOTAL LAND AREA 4,027.71
acres
Table 4.2 (Population and Employment Summary) shall be amended to read as follows to reflect the change for Public/Semi Public with no modifications to the footnotes:

TABLE 4.2

EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN

POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY
(Amended Per Resolution No. 47-04, 223-05, 58-07, 37-08, 176-09, 76-10, 55-12, 92- 12, 210-12, 198-13, 159-14, 165-15, 151-16, 85-21,
14-22, 133-22 and 136-22 and xx-24)
Land Use
Designation
Developmen
t
Sq
Ft/Employees
Persons/du Populatio
n
Commercial
Industrial Park .747 MSF 590 1,266
General
Commercial/Campus
Office*

1.956 MSF 385 5,081
General Commercial 2.746 MSF 510 5,384
Neighborhood
Commercial
.0 MSF 490 0
Mixed Use** 0 MSF 490 0
Mixed Use 2/Campus
Office****
.497 MSF 260 1,910
Campus Office 1.840 MSF 260 7,077
Campus Office/High
Density
.265 MSF 260 1,019
Medical Campus .950 260 3,654
Medical Campus/
Commercial
.250 510 490
Public/Semi Public 1.01 MSF 590 1,711
Semi-Public 0.03 MSF 590 51
TOTAL: 10.291 MSF 27,577
469
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 9 of 11 Table 4.7 (Fallon Gateway Subarea Development Potential) shall be amended to reflect the development potential for the General Commercial/Campus Office land use designation and shall read as follows with modifications to the footnote as shown below:

Table 4.7

FALLON GATEWAY
SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL1
Designation Acres Density Development
Potential
General Commercial 47.85 .25 FAR 521,087
General Commercial/Campus
Office
146.05 .28 - .60 FAR 1,781,343- 3,299,670
Medical Campus 42.88 .51 FAR 950,000
Industrial Park 61.3 .28 FAR 747,664
Total 298.08 --- 4,000,094 –
7,299,764
Natural Community Park 42.6 -- --
Open Space 2.28 -- --
Park/Open Space Total 44.88
1In 2006, the Fallon Village amendment expanded the Fallon Gateway Subarea to the west and north to encompass the entire GH PacVest property (as the Dublin Blvd. alignment had shifted north) except for the areas designated as Community Park and Medium High Density Residential.

Additionally, the areas of the GH PacVest, Righetti and Branaugh properties within the Livermore Airport Protection Area (formerly the Industrial subarea) were added to the Fallon Gateway Subarea. See Figure 4.2. Medical Campus 42.88 .51 FAR .950 msf Table 4.9 (Fallon Village Center Subarea Development Potential) shall be amended to reflect the change for the Medium-High Density designation and shall read as follows with no modifications to the footnote as shown below:

Residential
High Density 1,943 du 2.99 5,810
Campus Office/High
Density
715 du 2.99 2,138
Medium High Density 3,386 du 2.99 10,124
Medium Density 5,054 du 2.99 15,111
Single Family***(1) 3,789 du 2.99 11,329
Estate Residential 4 du 2.99 12
Mixed Use** 0 2.99 0
Rural
Residential/Agric.
5 du 2.99 16,5
TOTAL: 14,896 44,539
470
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 10 of 11 Table 4.9

FALLON VILLAGE CENTER

SUBAREA DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
(Amended per Resolution No. 92-12, 165-15, 85-21 and xx-24) Designation Acres Density Development Potential
Medium Density Residential 38.431 20 du/ac 384 du
Medium High Density Residential 13.33 20 du/ac 267 du
Residential Subtotal 52.13 -- 651 du
Neighborhood Square 2.0 -- 1 park
Community Park 13.5 -- 1 park
Open Space 3.6 -- --
Park/Open Space Total 1 community park
1 neighborhood
square
Public/Semi Public 5.7 --
Semi-Public 0 --
Total --- 651 du
Appendix 4 Land Use Summary by Land Owners “#21 GH PacVest (formerly Chen)”, “#23 GH PacVest (formerly Chen)”, “#29 GH PacVest (formerly EBJ”), and “#30 GH PacVest (formerly Pleasanton Ranch)” shall be amended to read as follows:

APPENDIX 4

EASTERN DUBLIN SPECIFIC PLAN

LAND USE SUMMARY BY LAND OWNERS
Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Square Feet Units #21 GH PACVEST
(FORMERLY CHEN)
Medium High Density
Residential 6.5 20 130
General Commercial / Campus
Office

90.74 0.6 2,371,580
Community Park 7.2
Natural Community Park 33.4
Open Space 2.28 -
Total 140.12 2,371,580 130
#22 GH PACVEST
(FORMERLY ANDERSON)
Medium-High Density
Residential 7.2 20 144
General Commercial / Campus
Office 34.01 0.6 888,885
Natural Community Park 9.19
471
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 11 of 11 Total 50.4 888,885 144
Owner/Land Use Category Acres Density Square Feet Units #29 GH PACVEST
(FORMERLY EBJ Partners)
General Commercial / Campus
Office 1.1 0.6 28,750
Total 1.1 28,750
#30 GH PACVEST
(FORMERLY PLEASANTON
RANCH)
General Commercial / Campus
Office .4 0.6 10,454
Total .4 10,454
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
472
Attachment 2
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 13 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 24

AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING STAGE 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 32- 05 AND A STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 13.7-ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR THE DUBLIN FALLON 580 PROJECT
PLPA-2023-00033
(APNs 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-004-00, 985-0027-005-00) The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The Property Owner, GH PacVest LLC, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment (Ordinance 32-05) and a Stage 2 Development Plan. The proposed project includes up to 238 residential units within 13.7 acres designated Medium High Density Residential, approximately 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/office uses on 126 acres designated General Commercial/Campus Office.

Requested approvals include a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment (Ordinance No. 32-05) and a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential parcels, Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667, and a Development Agreement. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Fallon 580 Project” or the “Project.” B. The project site is approximately 126 acres generally bounded by Jordan Ranch and Francis Ranch to the north, the vacant Righetti property to the east, Fallon Road to the west and Interstate 580 (I‐580) to the south.

C. This Ordinance adopts an amendment to the Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance 32-05) as it applies to the project area (APNs 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-004- 00, 985-0027-005-00) and a Stage 2 Development Plan for 13.7-acres of Medium High Density Residential within the Dublin Fallon 580 Project and located south of Jordan Ranch and east and west of Croak Road (APNs 985-0027-002-00 and 905-0001-006-03).

E. This Ordinance shall supersede Ordinance No. 13-08, adopted by the City Council on March 18, 2008, for an amended Stage 1 Development Plan and Stage 2 Development Plan for the 7-acre residential portion of the GH PacVest property (formerly Anderson) located east of Croak Road which, among other approvals established the regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance (APN 905-0001-006-03).

F. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) together with CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain project be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared.

G. Prior CEQA analysis for the Project area includes: 1) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR (1993); 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002); and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs.” Pursuant to the requirements of the CEQA, the City prepared an Addendum for the Project, which reflected the City’s independent judgment and analysis 473
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 13 of the potential environmental impacts of the Project and concludes that the Project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the EDSP EIRs and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met.

G. Following a properly noticed public hearing on June 11, 2024, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 24-05, recommending approval of the Addendum and the Dublin Fallon 580 Project, and approve General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendments, Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Amendments and a Stage 2 Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Tract Maps, and a Development Agreement for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project, which Resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours.

H. A Staff Report dated July 16, 2024, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the Planned Development Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, for the City Council.

I. The City Council considered the Addendum to the EDSP EIRs, and all above referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony at a properly noticed public hearing prior to taking action on the Project.

J. On July 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. xx-24 adopting the CEQA Addendum and approving a General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, which Resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours.

SECTION 2: FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Section 8.32.070 of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows:

1. The proposed Planned Development Zoning District meets the purpose and intent of Chapter 8.32 in that 1) it provides maximum flexibility and diversification in the development of property; 2) maintains consistency with, and implements the provisions of, the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; 3) protects the integrity and character of both residential and non-residential areas of the City; 4) encourages efficient use of land for preservation of sensitive environmental areas such as open space areas and topographic features; 5) provides for effective development of public facilities and services for the site; 6) encourages use of design features to achieve development that is compatible with the area; and 7) allows for creative and imaginative design that will promote amenities beyond those expected in conventional developments.

2. Development under the Planned District Development would be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in surrounding areas in that 1) the proposed project is located within the Fallon Village Stage 1 Development Plan area which has a mix of residential, commercial and industrial areas; 2) the project’s residential area will be consistent the planned residential projects, including Francis Ranch to the north and medium density residential land use to the east and 3) the future industrial area to the east are envisioned to be developed with similar and compatible uses.

Pursuant to Sections 8.120.050.A and B of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows:
474
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 13

1. The proposed amendment would be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in surrounding areas in that 1) the proposed project is located within the Fallon Village Stage 1 Development Plan area which has a mix of residential, commercial and industrial areas; 2) the project’s residential area will be consistent with the planned residential projects, including Francis Ranch to the north and medium density residential land use to the east; and 3) the future industrial area to the east are envisioned to be developed with similar and compatible uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type, intensity of the zoning district being proposed in that the proposed density and development standards in the proposed zoning is consistent with the existing Stage 1 Development Plan and existing and proposed land use designations in the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan.

3. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare in that 1) the proposed amendment addresses the planned design of the Dublin Boulevard extension and provides for a FAR for general commercial/campus offices uses consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and 2) the commercial/office area to the east is envisioned to be developed with similar and compatible uses.

4. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in that the proposed land uses and densities are consistent with land use designations in the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan as amended.

B. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 32-05 (Section 3.2.A.3), the City Council makes the following findings regarding the amendments to the Stage 1 Development Plan as follows:

1. The proposed use and development is consistent with the General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

2. The proposed development is consistent with Stage 1 and 2 design guidelines.

3. Appropriate transitions are developed between projects where an industrial use is adjacent to a different use. These transitions can be created through careful design of landscaping, consideration of the relationship of the uses to buildings on surrounding sites, building and circulation layout, and setbacks.

4. The size, scale and intensity of development do not conflict with the character of the district and adjacent land uses.

5. Adequate space, light, and air along with visual and acoustical privacy are provided.

6. No excessive noise, illumination, unsightliness, odor, smoke, and other objectionable influences are generated.

7. On and off-site vehicular and pedestrian linkages and circulation are functional and minimize barriers.

8. Streetscapes and parking lots are varied, create visual interest and are pedestrian friendly.
475
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 4 of 13

9. The development provides access to public transit and services.

10.Adequate on-site parking, including the ability to participate in shared parking, is provided.

11.Where possible, certain elements should be coordinated and shared, including access drives; internal circulation; perimeter open space and landscape buffers; service, loading, and refuse locations; and drainage, detention, and water quality facilities.

SECTION 3. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
Pursuant to Chapter 8.32, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code the City of Dublin Zoning Map is amended to rezone the property described below to a Planned Development Zoning District:

Approximately 192-acres located south of Jordan Ranch, north of I-580, east of Fallon Road, and just beyond Croak Road (APNs 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027- 004-00, 985-0027-005-00 (the “Property”)
A map of the rezoning area with a related Stage 2 Development Plan for the Medium- High Density Residential is shown below:

SECTION 4. AMENDMENTS TO THE OF STAGE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 32-05
Fallon Village Stage 1 Development Plan
On December 20, 2005, the City Council approved a Stage 1 Development Plan for the 1,134- acre Fallon Village Project (Ordinance 32-05), pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. The Planned Development Stage 1 Development Plan for the Fallon Village Project is amended as shown below. All other provisions of Ordinance 32-05 remain unchanged. 476
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 5 of 13

1. Statement of Proposed Uses. The statement of proposed uses shall amend PD-Parks with the addition of Natural Community Park as a permitted use and PD-Public/Semi-Public to remove reference to the location of the Public/Semi-Public on the GH PacVest property within the Fallon Village Center as follows:

PD-Park
Intent. Community and neighborhood open space and recreational area, both active and passive.

Permitted Uses
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Square
Natural Community Park
Recreational and educational facility
Trail staging area
Similar and related uses as determined by the Community Development Director PD-Public/Semi-Public
Intent. Identifies areas where institutional or community facilities uses are anticipated. The exact location of parcels with a Public/Semi-Public designation shall be determined at Stage

2. The Public/Semi-Public parcels on the Francis Ranch (formerly Croak/East Ranch) properties (net 2.0-acres) shall be located within the Fallon Village Center.

2. Development Regulations. Amend Development Regulations for PD-General/Campus Office, and PD-industrial Park projects in Fallon Village to reflect the mix of uses for the GH PacVest property as follows:

A. PD-General Commercial/Campus Office, and PD-Industrial Park

1. Development Standards
b. Each property owner shall develop their General Commercial/Campus Office parcel with a mix of land uses consistent with the assumptions made in their respective traffic studies as follows:

Property Traffic Study Traffic Assumption Summary
GH
PacVest
Dublin Fallon 580
Local
Transportation
Analysis dated
March 2024
(Kittelson)
ITE Land Use Unit
Amount
Weekday
ADT
Advanced
Manufacturing 2888.4 KSF 13,720
Hotel 314 rooms 2,509
Retail 100 KSF 3,701
Office 100 KSF 1,084
Righetti
Fallon Village
Traffic Study
dated August
2005
The Traffic Study assumed development
would consist of 70% commercial and 30%
office.
477
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 6 of 13 This mix of commercial and office uses may be modified as long as the traffic impacts for each parcel remain consistent with the assumptions made in the Traffic Study.

3. Stage 1 Site Plan. Amend the Stage 1 Site Plan as shown in Figure 1, to replace Exhibit A of Ordinance 32-05 in its entirety to accurately reflect the changes in the land use designations for Fallon Village.

Figure 1. Stage 1 Site Plan

4. Stage 1 Design Guidelines. Amend Exhibit B in Ordinance 32-05 as follows: Retaining Walls (p. 56-58). Details on retaining walls for the GH PacVest Properties shall be as shown on the approved tentative maps for the respective residential developments.

5. Site area, proposed densities. The Table in Section 5 (site area, proposed densities) of Ordinance 32-05 is amended to accurately reflect the changes to the land use designations for Fallon Village (no changes to the footnotes):

Land Use Acreage Density
Single Family Residential 403.6 acres 0-6.0 units/acre
Medium Density Residential 60.1 acres 6.1-14.0 units/acre 478
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 7 of 13 Medium High Density
Residential

23.8 acres 14.1-25.0 units/acre
Rural
Residential/Agriculture
142.9 acres 1 unit/100 acres
Mixed Use 6.4 acres 0.3-1.00 FAR
General Commercial/
Campus Office
144.3 acres 0.20-0.80 FAR
Industrial Park 61.3 acres 0.35 / 0.40 FAR1
Community Park 18.3 acres --
Neighborhood Park 23.6 acres --
Neighborhood Square 8.0 acres --
Natural Community Park 42.6 acres --
Open Space 168.6 acres --
Elementary School 21.1 acres --
Semi-Public 4.1 acres 0.50 FAR
Public/Semi-Public 2.0 acres 0.50 FAR
1The maximum FAR for warehousing uses is 0.40 for the Branaugh Property only. For all other uses and parcels, the maximum FAR is 0.35.

6. Phasing Plan. Amend the Stage 1 Phasing Plan as shown in Figure 2, to replace Exhibit C of Ordinance 32-05 in its entirety to accurately reflect the land use designations for Fallon Village.

Figure 2. Stage 1 Phasing Plan

7. Master Neighborhood Landscaping Plan. Amend the Stage 1 Master Neighborhood Landscaping Plan as shown in Figure 3, to replace Exhibit D of Ordinance 32-05 in its entirety to accurately reflect the changes to land use designations for Fallon Village. 479
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 8 of 13 Figure 3. Stage 1 Master Neighborhood Landscaping Plan
480
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 9 of 13

8. Master Infrastructure Plan. Amend the Stage 1 Master Infrastructure Plan as shown in Figure 4, to replace Exhibit F in Ordinance 32-05 in its entirety to accurately reflect the changes to land use designation for Fallon Village.

Figure 4. Master Infrastructure Plan

9. Street Sections. Amend Exhibit G in Ordinance 32-05 as follows: Street sections for GH PacVest Properties shall be as shown on the approved tentative maps for the respective developments.

SECTION 5. APPROVAL OF STAGE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The regulations for the use, development, improvement, and maintenance of the Property are set forth in the following Stage 2 Development Plan for the 13.7-acre portion of the GH PacVest area (APNs 985-0027-002-00 and 905-0001-006-03), which is hereby approved. Any amendments to the Stage 2 Development Plan shall be in accordance with Section 8.32.080 of the Dublin Municipal Code or its successors. This Stage 2 Development Plan supersedes and replaces Ordinance 13-08 in its entirety.

Stage 2 Development Plan
The following is a Stage 2 Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 8.32 of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. This Development Plan meets all the requirements of a Stage 2 Development Plan and is adopted as part of the PD-Planned Development rezoning for the Dublin Fallon 580 Medium-High Density Residential (PLPA-2023-00033).

The PD-Planned Development District and this Stage 2 Development Plan provides flexibility to encourage innovative development while ensuring that the goals, policies, and action programs of the General Plan and provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the Zoning Ordinance are satisfied. 481
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 10 of 13

1. Statement of compatibility with the Stage 1 Development Plan. The Dublin Fallon 580 Residential Stage 2 Development Plan is consistent with the Stage 1 Development Plan for the Fallon Village Project area (Ordinance No. 32-05), as amended in Section 4 above.

2. Statement of Uses. Permitted, conditional, accessory and temporary uses are allowed as set forth in the Stage 1 Planned Development for Fallon Village in Ordinance No. 32-05 as amended, which is incorporated herein by reference.

3. Stage 2 Site Plan. The following Stage 2 Site Plan is conceptual. Final site design shall be determined by the Site Development Review Permit.

4. Site Area, Proposed Densities.

Land Use Size
(Gross
Acres)
Units Density
(du/ac)
Parcel 7 -Tract 8666
Medium-High Density
Residential

6.5 128 19.7
Parcel 8- Tract 8667
Medium-High Density
Residential

7.2 110 15.3
Total 13.7 238 17.4

5. Development Regulations.

Residential Development Standards
CRITERIA Medium High Density
Product Type
Attached Product, Townhome,
Condominium
482
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 11 of 13 Maximum Building Height(4)(12) 40'
Maximum Stories 3
Minimum Setbacks (1)(2)(4)(6)
Front setback- Porch/ Living to ROW 5'
Rear Setback- garage to back of curb P/L 3'
Rear setback-balcony/deck to back of curb P/L
(2nd/3rd story) 0.5’
Side setback- Bldg end to ROW or P/L 4’
Minimum Building Separation (2)(3)(4)
Bldg. to Bldg.- Paseo (Front) 18.5’
Bldg. to Bldg.- End 10’
Bldg. to Bldg.- Garage (Rear) 30’
Minimum Drive Aisle- with Aerial Fire Access 26’
Minimum Drive Aisle- No Aerial Fire Access 22’
Parking Spaces Required Per Home (11)
2 covered plus 1 guest parking
space for95% of the units.

Minimum Usable Private Open Space (SF) (7)
60 S.F of private outdoor balcony,
deck, patio space with 6’ minimum
dimension
Notes:
(1) Setbacks measured from property line or as otherwise noted. (2) See following “Typical Plotting Concept” exhibits for graphic depiction of above standards (3) Items such as, but not limited to air conditioning condensers, porches, chimneys, bay windows, retaining walls less than 4' in height, media centers, etc. may encroach 2' into the required setback of one side yard, provided a minimum of a 3' flat and level area is maintained for access around the house.
(4) Setbacks are subject to Building Code requirements for access. (5) Maximum height of a front yard courtyard wall shall be 30" maximum (solid wall) or 42" maximum (transparent/fence)
(6) Patios / Private outdoor open space may encroach into the Front or Side Setback by up to 3’ (7) Retaining walls up to 4' high may be used to create a level usable area. Retaining walls in excess of 4' to create usable area are subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director. Retaining walls over 30" in height are subject to safety criteria as determined by the Building Official.
(8) Curbside parking may be counted toward required number of guest spaces. 2 covered side-by-side spots shall be provided. Tandem spaces may not be utilized to meet the parking requirement. (9) Accessory Structure Setbacks will follow the City Dublin Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 8.40:

Accessory Structures and Uses Regulations
(10) A low wall (30" or less) may encroach into the site line area. No solid structure above 30" shall be allowed; porch columns excluded.
(11) Adjustments to the parking requirements shall be subject to Dublin Municipal Code 8.76.05. (12) Refer to Dublin Municipal Code Ch 8.36.110 for height exceptions. 483
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 12 of 13 Typical Plotting Concepts

6. Architectural Design Guidelines. Please refer to Exhibit A.

7. Preliminary Landscape Plan. Please refer to Exhibit B.

8. Inclusionary Zoning Regulations. The project shall comply with the Inclusionary Zoning Regulations (Chapter 8.68) for the provision of affordable housing unless otherwise defined by the Development Agreement.

9. Public Art. The project shall comply with Public Art Program Contribution (Chapter 8.58) and either make a contribution for or provide public art in accordance with the Dublin Municipal Code.

10. Applicable Requirements of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance. Except as specifically provided in this Stage 2 Development Plan and the Stage 1 Development Plan (Ordinance No. 32-05), 484
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 13 of 13 the use, development, improvement and maintenance of the Property shall be governed by the provision of the Dublin Zoning Ordinance pursuant to 8.32.060C or its successor. The closest comparable zoning district is as follows:

Residential:

R-M Multi-Family Residential District
General Commercial/Campus Office:

C-2 General Commercial District and M-P Industrial Park Zoning District, whichever is least restrictive.

SECTION 5. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public spaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this ___ day of _______, 2024 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
485
DUBLIN FALLON 580

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

DUBLIN, CA
FEBRUARY 2024
GH Pacvest, LLC
$WWDFKPHQW
([KLELW$WR2UGLQDQFH$UFKLWHFWXUDO'HVLJQ*XLGHOLQHV 486
2 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
487
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines 3
Table of Contents
Introduction 4
Architectural Components 5
Architectural Styles 9
A
B
C
488
4 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
A
Introduction
Purpose and Objective
The Architectural Guidelines provides the architecture framework for future development within Dublin Fallon 580 with the goal of high-quality designed homes. These guidelines and the graphic representations contained herein are for conceptual purposes only. Guidelines with the term “shall” are required and to be implemented; guidelines with the term “should” are highly recommended. The Architectural Guidelines are organized into two sections: B. Architectural Components, and C. Architectural Styles. These guidelines are to be used with the Development Standards for the project, which dictate height, open space and setback requirements.

Exhibit 1.1: GH Pacvest Site Context Map N.T.S.

7.2 Ac
489
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines 5
B
Architectural Components
The public realm architecture is comprised of building and design components that include: Building Façades, Roofs and Roof Decks, Garages, Architectural Details, and Materials and Colors. When appropriately designed, these components can create visually interesting streetscapes and human scale environments. This section of the Architectural Design Guidelines covers architectural components and addresses Universal Design and Accessory Dwelling Units.

Building Façades
Building Façades constitute all vertical sides of the building: front, sides, and rear that, together with the roof, creates a building’s mass and scale.

A building’s mass and scale directly impact the overall streetscape of a neighborhood. To encourage a pedestrian friendly environment and visually interesting streetscape, the following guidelines are encouraged:
• Stagger wall planes in the horizontal and/or vertical plane, where appropriate, to break up the elevation to avoid large building massing.
• Provide projections and recesses in building elevations appropriate to the architectural style to create shadow and depth.
• Use balconies to create plane breaks in the building elevations. • Buildings shall be designed with “4-sided” architecture to create high-quality homes that are human-scale and enhance the public realm.
• %XLOGLQJVVKDOOEHGHVLJQHGWRGLႇHUHQWLDWHDGH¿QHGEDVHDPLGGOH or body, and a top, cornice, or parapet cap as appropriate to the building style.

Staggered wall planes
Use balconies to create plane breaks in the
building elevations.
490
6 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Components B
Roofs and Roof Decks
The building roof provides an important function to the home and to shaping the skyline and a building’s overall form.
• Variation of roof forms are encouraged to allow for the creation of an interesting roofscape and streetscape.
• Roof forms can include, but are not limited to, gable, shed, and hip. Flat roofs may be allowed under the Contemporary and Contemporary Spanish architectural styles, especially when roof decks are part of the building design.
• Roof material and color shall complement the architectural style of the home.
• Roof decks, if implemented, should be designed as an integral part of the overall building design, consider solar panel requirements, KDYHDGHTXDWHUDLOLQJVIRUVDIHW\DQGSULYDF\DQGRႇHUDGHTXDWH private open space for residents.

Garages
Garages provide a sheltered space for vehicles and, when thoughtfully placed and designed, will de-emphasize the vehicle and can add to the articulation of the overall building form.
• Alley-load buildings with garage in the alley are encouraged to promote a walkable pedestrian streetscape.
• Garage door recesses into surrounding wall planes, and/or with 2nd ÀRRUDERYHFDQWLOHYHUHGDUHHQFRXUDJHGWRKHOSGHHPSKDVL]HWKH garage door.
• Garage door windowlites are allowed and should be appropriate to the architectural style of the home.
• To soften alleyways with many garage doors, appropriate landscaping (i.e. small hedges, climbing trellis, etc. ) in between garage doors is encouraged.

Roof deck
Landscaping in between garage doors
Variation in roof forms
491
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines 7
B Architectural Components
Architectural Details
The Architectural Details of a building help complete the design vision DQGFDQPHDQWKHGLႇHUHQFHEHWZHHQDZHOFRPLQJVWUHHWVFHQHZLWK appeal and one that may be non-inviting and bland. This section includes guidelines for the following Architectural Details: entryways, windows and doors, exterior lighting, gutters and down spouts, building addresses, and mechanical equipment.

Entryways
• Entryways present the threshold between public and private spaces and are a focal point to the building façade. The following elements are encouraged to be used to articulate the entryway as a focal point: Porch, Trellis, Portico, and Recessed Entryway.
• Where entryways face a paseo, there shall be a walkway, 4’ wide minimum, connecting the entryway to the paseo.
• Where entryways face a street, there shall be a walkway, 4’ wide minimum, connecting the entryway to the sidewalk.

Windows and Doors
• Window and door design and their trim elements shall be consistent with the overall architectural style of the building.
• Window shutters, when used, shall be the same size and shape as the window opening they appear to shutter.
• Window frames shall be appropriately colored to match or complement the house or trim colors for each color scheme.

Exterior Lighting
• Exterior lighting shall adhere to standards and regulations in Dublin Municipal Code 7.32.270: Building Security, Section (D) Lighting. • $OOEXLOGLQJPRXQWHGDQGVLWHOLJKWLQJ¿[WXUHVVKDOOEHIXOO\VKLHOGHG DQGXWLOL]HFRORUVDQG¿QLVKHVWRFRPSOHPHQWWKHEXLOGLQJ¶V architectural style.

Gutters and Downspouts
• Gutters and downspouts shall be integrated into the overall building design in regards to location and color.

A walkway connecting the entryway to the
paseo
Window designs and trim elements
Window shutters proportional to the window
opening
492
8 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Components B
Building Addresses
• Building address numbers should be of a clear typeface appropriate to building style.
• Lighting and visibility of building addresses should adhere to the regulations in Dublin Municipal Code 7.32.120: Address Illumination.

Mechanical Equipment
• Mechanical equipment located on the ground shall be screened from view from the public to maintain a pedestrian friendly street scene. Screening can be landscape and/or a fencing screen. • Mechanical equipment located in cabinets and/or on the wall shall be appropriately screened with doors that are integrated into the overall building design and/or landscaping that will not obscure access to the equipment per utility company standards.
• Any rooftop equipment shall be integrated into the overall building design and screened from public views.

Materials and Colors
The Materials and Colors of a building have a direct impact on the streetscape and overall neighborhood. The following guidelines are to be referenced with the materials allowed for each architectural style. • Materials and colors shall be of high-quality and durable, weather ZHOODQGUHÀHFWWKHKRPH¶VDUFKLWHFWXUDOVW\OH
• Material and color blocking shall not terminate at outside corners and shall wrap to appropriate transition points of the building façade. • Materials and colors at the base of buildings should continue to where the building meets grade so the building is well seated into WKHVWUHHWDYRLGLQJD³ÀRDWLQJ´ORRN
Universal Design
The proposed buildings will adhere to the Universal Design Guidelines as outlined in Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 7.90: Universal Design.

Accessory Dwelling Units
Accessory Dwelling Units proposed in Dublin Fallon 580 will adhere to the standards and regulations as outlined in Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.80: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations.

Example of well screened Mechnical
Equipment on ground level
%XLOGLQJVIDFLQJDFURVVDVWUHHWXVHGL௺HUHQW
color schemes for street scene variation
493
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines 9
C
Architectural Styles
The architectural styles of Dublin Fallon 580 draw from the project site’s setting of rolling hills and its relationship to the surrounding area DQGH[LVWLQJUHVLGHQWLDOQHLJKERUKRRGV7KHIROORZLQJ¿YHDUFKLWHFWXUDO VW\OHVLGHQWL¿HGIRU'XEOLQ)DOORQDUHDPL[WXUHRIWUDGLWLRQDODQG FRQWHPSRUDU\VW\OHVRႇHULQJYDULDWLRQ
• Traditional Farmhouse
• Modern Farmhouse
• Contemporary
• Contemporary Spanish
• Modern French Country
494
10 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Styles C

MINIMUM CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS
Roof Form
• Gable Roof Forms
• 3:12 to 8:12 Pitch
• 12” to 18” deep Eaves
• 6” to 12” deep Rakes
• Shed Accent Roofs
Roof Materials
• Dimensional Composition Shingle
5RR¿QJDQGRU6WDQGLQJ6HDP0HWDO
5RR¿QJ
Exterior Finish
• Board and Batten Siding
• Lap Siding with 6 to 8 inch Exposure
• Stucco Finish
• Brick or Stone Veneer
Windows and
Doors
• Single Hung and Casement Windows
• Accent Painted Entry Doors
• Panelized or Carriage House Sectional
Garage Doors
• Fixed Accent Windows
Trims and
Accents
• Wood trim, Fiber Cement Trim, and/or
+LJK'HQVLW\)RDPZLWKSUHFDVW¿QLVK
RUVPRRWKVWXFFR¿QLVK
• Wood Brackets or Kickers
• Wood Porch Posts
• Wood Railings
• Decorative false vents in gable ends
• Trim same color as adjacent body color
Traditional Farmhouse
495
Modern Farmhouse
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Styles
11 C

MINIMUM CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS
Roof Form
• Gable Roof Forms
• 3:12 to 6:12 Pitch
• 6” to 12” deep Eaves
• 0” to 6” deep Rakes
• Shed Accent Roofs
Roof Materials
• Dimensional Composition Shingle
5RR¿QJDQGRU6WDQGLQJ6HDP0HWDO
5RR¿QJ
Exterior Finish
• Lap Siding
• Stucco Finish
• Board and Batten Accent Siding
• Brick and/or Stone Veneer
Windows and
Doors
• Single Hung and Casement Windows
• Accent Painted Entry Doors
• Panelized or carriage house sectional
Garage Doors
• Fixed Accent Windows
Trims and
Accents
• Wood trim, Fiber Cement Trim, and/or
+LJK'HQVLW\)RDPZLWKSUHFDVW¿QLVK
RUVPRRWKVWXFFR¿QLVK
• Wood brackets or Kickers
• Wood Porch Posts
• Metal Railings
• Metal Awnings over windows or doors
• Trim same color as adjacent body color
496
12 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Styles C

MINIMUM CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS
Roof Form
• One primary roof form
• Secondary roof forms, and/or dormers
smaller than primaryroof form
• Gable, Shed or Flat roofs
• 0”-18” Eaves
• 0”-18” Rakes
Roof Materials • Dimensional composition roof shingles
• Flat Concrete Roof Tiles • Standing Seam metal roof
Exterior Finish
• Horizontal Lap Siding with 4”-8”
exposure
• Horizontal or Vertical T&G Siding
• Metal siding
• 6WXFFRVPRRWKRU¿QHGDVK¿QLVK
• Brick or Stone Veneer
Windows and
Doors
• Single Hung Windows
• Casement Windows
• Slider Windows
• Square or Rectangular Windows
• Flat garage doors (no panels) or
rectangular recessed panels (no bevels
encouraged)
• Flush entry doors with no panels. Any
glazing to be square or rectangular
• Awning Accent Windows
Trims and
Accents
• Recessed windows or enhanced
window trims
• Rectangular, Square or Round columns
and pilasters – minimum of 4” width in
any direction
Contemporary
497
Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Styles
13 C

MINIMUM CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS
Roof Form • Gable Roof and/or Hipped Roof
• 4:12 - 6:12 Roof Pitches • Limited Flat Roof Areas
Roof Materials
• Clay or Concrete Roof Tiles, one of the
following shapes
• Barrel Roof Tile
• Flat Concrete
• S-shaped Concrete
• Standing Seam metal Accent Roof
Areas
Exterior Finish • Predominately Stucco
• Horizontal Lap Siding
• Tongue and Groove Siding
• Stone or Brick Veneer
• Tile Accents
Windows and
Doors
• Single Hung Windows
• Casement Windows
• Slider Windows
• Contemporary Paneled front doors (no
beveled panels)
• Flat garage doors (no panels) or
rectangular recessed panels (no bevels
encouraged)
• Fixed Accent Windows
• Solid, Flat Front Doors
Trims and
Accents
• Recessed windows or enhanced
window trims
• Metal Railings
• Wood Railings
• Decorative Metal Details
• False Tiles Vents
Contemporary Spanish
498
14 Dublin Fallon 580 Design Guidelines
Architectural Styles C

MINIMUM CHARACTERISTICS SUGGESTED ENHANCEMENTS
Roof Form • Gable Roof
• 4:12 - 7:12 Roof Pitches
• Hipped Roof accents, 4:12 - 7:12 roof
pitches
• Limited Flat Roof Areas
Roof Materials • Dimensional Roof Shingles and/or Flat
Concrete Tile
• Standing Seam Metal Accent Roof
Areas
Exterior Finish • Predominately Stucco
• Horizontal Lap Siding
• Tongue and Groove Siding
• Stone or Brick Veneer
Windows and
Doors
• Single Hung Windows
• Casement Windows
• Slider Windows
• Contemporary Paneled Front Doors (no
beveled panels)
• Flat garage doors (no panels) or
rectangular recessed panels (no bevels
encouraged)
• Fixed Accent Windows
• 6ROLGÀDWIURQWGRRUV
Trims and
Accents
• Recessed windows or enhanced
window trims
• Metal Railings
• Wood Railings
• Decorative Metal Details
• False tile vents
Modern French Country
499
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
500
2 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

CONCEPT
The Dublin Fallon 580 property comprises of 13.66 acres designated for high-density multi-family residential
use (Parcels 7 and 8, depicted below with pedestrian
circulation and bicycle connections). The selection
and arrangement of materials, colors, and textures will create a unified community aesthetic. The overarching
landscape theme will feature vibrant, blossoming
plant life, complemented by evergreen planting that
harmonizes with the architecture and encourages
pedestrian access and connectivity both within the
community and to neighboring areas.

Each entrance to the neighborhoods will have its
own enhanced character while still fitting in with the
surrounding community. The proposed landscaping
will contribute to a strong visual identity. Within the residential community, the internal streets and sidewalks will be adorned with various street trees, strategically positioned to maximize solar exposure. Additionally, lowgrowing flowering groundcover will enhance pedestrian connections to the public sidewalks.

DESIGN PRINCIPLES
• Create an aesthetically pleasing site by carefully
selecting and arranging materials, colors, and textures that harmonize with the natural open space.
• Offer outdoor amenities to residents, including shaded paseos and outdoor seating areas.
• Promote a unified neighborhood identity through
distinctive entry branding and consistent site elements. • Establish a cohesive and inviting atmosphere at
night by implementing street lighting throughout
the neighborhood, ensuring safety, aesthetics, and a
sense of continuity.

Pedestrian circulation
Parcel 8

7.16 Ac
Parcel 8

7.20 Ac
Parcel 7

6.50 Ac
Parcel 7

6.50Ac
Parcel 7

6.50 Ac
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection
Pedestrian Routes on Primary Streets
with Sidewalks
Pedestrian Routes Through Paseos
501
3 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
Croak Road Hillside Condition
Scale: N.T.S.

STREETS AND ENTRIES
Neighborhood Streets
The neighborhood streets will be carefully designed
to create a well-organized layout that guides both
vehicles and pedestrians throughout the community.

Landscaping will be incorporated along the streets
to create an attractive street scene. Textured paving
materials like stamped asphalt, stamped concrete, or
pavers can be used in crosswalks to visually enhance the pedestrian pathways.

The selection of street trees will be coordinated with
utilities and street lights to create a continuous canopy of trees along the streets. Additional trees will be strategically placed in irregular patterns, and screening trees will be positioned near building ends to soften the architectural features. A tiered approach will be employed, incorporating low-growing groundcover, intermediate shrubs, and
background shrubs to provide a diverse landscape with
seasonal colors and textural contrast. Please refer to the plant palette for suggested species and required sizes.

Neighborhood Entries
To emphasize the arrival and unique character of
the community, incorporate distinctive plantings or
monuments at entry points. Ensure that the design of
these features aligns with the architectural style of the surroundings.

Croak Road
The sloped edge along Croak Road should continue the
character of the valley and have a natural and California landscape. It should include grasses, native plants, trees and low-lying groundcovers. The east side of Croak Road is a gentle hillside, shown below.

Open Space Interface Roads
Streets along the open space should have a rural and
lightly landscaped edge that allows for views of the
valley. The opposite site should provide street trees and a variety of planting.

Entry monument with thematic landscaping Street trees in parkway strips or front yard planting areas 502
4 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Landscaping between garage doors Neighborhood paseos

COMMON LANDSCAPE AREAS
Paseos
Paseos are designated pedestrian walkways within the
community, offering a pleasant and convenient means
of getting around without interference from vehicles. It is essential to adorn the paseos with carefully selected plantings that enhance the visual appeal and provide an enjoyable walking experience. Additionally, incorporating seating areas, fountains, or sculptures along the paseos can further enhance the overall ambiance. The paseos
should seamlessly integrate into the overall design of the residential development.

Alleyways
By strategically considering their placement and design, garages can be integrated into the landscape in a way
that minimizes their visual prominence and enhances
the overall landscape experience. Introducing suitable
plantings such as small hedges or climbing trellises
between garage doors can soften the appearance of
alleyways.

To safeguard the landscaping from interference by
vehicles or pedestrians, raised planting surfaces,
depressed walkways, or curbs should be employed.

Concrete mow-strips should separate turf and shrub
areas, creating a connected network of pathways, and
incorporating focal elements along sight lines.
503
5 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
Pocket parks

POCKET PARKS
Pocket parks are small green spaces nestled into the
fabric of an urban neighborhood that provide public
space for social engagement, relaxation, and exercise.

Pocket parks typically feature seating opportunities,
aesthetic landscaping, and other amenities that improve the physical and psychological well-being of local
residents. Pocket parks often fill irregularly shaped or underutilized lots and can serve as focal points of activity and interest for the surrounding population.

Pocket parks also offer convenient points of access for emergency vehicles by connecting the inner community
zone to the external arterial roads. This is achieved
through the strategic placement of durable and weatherresistant hardscape materials that can support heavy vehicles, for example, a full-sized fire engine. Hardscape treatments such as decorative pavers provide a unique
plaza experience for visitors while ensuring safety and efficiency for emergency responders.
504
6 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Parcel 7
There is an opportunity for a pocket park within Parcel

7. This common green space would directly serve
the adjacent residential buildings and provide a key
connection to to the existing developement and park. In addition to an open area for social gathering, the pocket park would feature a pedestrian and bicycle connection
to the Neighborhood Square park to the north, a green
landscaped perimeter, and outdoor site elements such as benches and lighting.

Parcel 8
There is an opportunity for a pocket park in the northern area within Parcel 8. This common green space would
directly serve the adjacent 5-plex residential building and provide a key connection to Central Parkway. In addition to an open area for social gathering, the pocket park
would feature a pedestrian and bicycle connection to
East Ranch, a green landscaped perimeter, and outdoor
site elements such as benches and lighting.

There is an additional pocket park opportunity along
the western edge of Parcel 8 with frontage to Croak
Road. This area may potentially offer additional common space and seating opportunities to improve quality of
life and community cohesion. This location could provide direct pedestrian and bicycle access to the sidewalk
and supplement neighborhood connections to the
surrounding circulation network.

Parcel 8 pocket park opportunity areas
Parcel 7 pocket park opportunity area
Pocket Park with
Ped. / Bike Access
Pocket Park with
Ped. / Bike Access
Pocket Park
505
7 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

OUTDOOR SITE ELEMENTS
Street Lighting
All street lighting in the residential neighborhood will conform to approved City standards. Street lighting
is used for both decoration as well as marking special
pathways and landmarks.

Model: The Lumec L60 LED Hexagonal Lantern series
on 18.5’ tall post is recommended, to match the current City’s standard.

Mailbox
Clustered mailbox will be used. The mailbox location/
model shall be reviewed and approved by USPS.

Signage
Signage shall conform to City ordinances.

Perimeter Fence
For security reasons, it may be necessary to install a fence around the property. To enhance the visual appeal, it is recommended to incorporate landscaping elements such
as climbing vines and tall hedges adjacent to the fence.

Gates should be included in walls or fences as needed to ensure emergency or maintenance access.

Benches and Trash Receptacles
Benches and trash receptacles should be placed
strategically to ensure visitor convenience. The model
of bench and trash receptacle should be consistent
throughout the neighborhood.

Bike Parking
Bicycle racks play a crucial role in promoting sustainable and active transportation. Provide bicycle parking, where feasible, to support intermodal travel for residents.

Street Lighting
Scale: N.T.S.

Perimeter fence
Benches and trash receptacles
Bicycle parking
506
8 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

FENCES AND WALLS
The landscape system encompasses community theme
walls, fencing, and front yard planting. Each element of the landscape is carefully designed to reflect the unique character and exceptional quality of the community.

Typically, fences will be positioned away from the view triangles at intersections to ensure visibility and safety.

Where necessary, breaks in the fence, removable sections, or gates will be incorporated to allow for maintenance
access to adjacent utilities, such as water quality basins.

Good Neighbor Fence - The good neighbor fence should
be located between lots. The design is a vertical board wood fence, 6’ tall with caps and fascia boards. Wood 4x4 posts are located at a minimum of 8’ on center.

Lattice Top Fence - This fence should be used parallel to the front of the home. Where side yards abut a residential street, the lattice fence will also be used. Where the fence is adjacent to the street, a 3 foot landscape buffer, at a minimum, is provided between the walkway and fence.

Open Space Interface Fence - This fence should be
utilized along the wildfire buffer lots where they abut open space. The fence should not exceed 4 feet in height.

Concrete Split Rail Fence - This fence is utilized in the landscape along the southern sidewalks of street B
serving as a thematic element to keep pedestrians out of water quality basins.

CMU Block Wall - Use split face CMU block wall where
needed to retain throughout the community. Tree
plantings for screening on the retaining wall slope are discussed in the following section.
2”x6” Cap
Vertical Wood Lattice
4”x4” Post
2”x4” Bottom Rail
1”x6” Kick Board
1”x8” With 1”
Overlap Each Side
8’-0” MAX
6’-0”
Good Neighbor Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

Lattice Top Fence
Scale: N.T.S.
507
9 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
L ti
Open Space Interface Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

Concrete Split Rail Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

CMU Retaining Wall
Scale: N.T.S.
508
10 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME HEIGHT SPREAD
Acer rubrum ‘Armstrong‘ Red Maple 60’ 15’
Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 40’ 40’
Koelreuteria paniculata Goldenrain Tree 30’ 35’
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 25’ 25’
Pistacia chinensis ‘Keith Davey’ Chinese Pistache 40’ 40’ Platanus x acerifolia ‘Yarwood’ London Plane Tree 60’ 35’ Prunus x yedoensis ‘Akebono‘ Yoshino Cherry 25’ 25’
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 50’ 50’
Tilia cordata ‘Greenspire’ Greenspire Little Leaf Linden 40’ 30’ Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm 60’ 50’
Zelkova serrata Japanese Zelkova 50’ 50’
PLANTING LIST  TREES
Street Trees

PLANTING DESIGN
The landscaping should elevate the overall quality of
the neighborhood by framing and softening the look
of structures, delineating site functions, and providing screening and buffering from adjacent uses. Whenever
feasible, landscaped areas should follow a three-tiered planting approach: 1) trees, taking into account the
available planting space; 2) shrubs; and 3) grasses, ground covers, and vines. Utilize tree patterns and structure to emphasize entries, create edges, provide privacy, and
itnegrate open space. This ensures a visually appealing landscape design. This is not an exhaustive list and
development plans may include others that appropriate
for the project and microclimate.

Plant material should be selected appropriately for
location and microclimate. Provide a combination of
evergreen, deciduous and flowering trees. A variety of
flowering, variegated, and evergreen shrubs should be
mixed to maintain visual interest and seasonal diversity.

Emphasis will be placed on the use of low-water, climateadapted, and deer-resistant plant materials. Plants should be selected and spaced appropriately for their
mature size to ensure healthy growth and to reduce
trimming and shearing. Micro-climates, soil conditions, and irrigation water quality must be considered in plant selection. Plants with similar watering needs should be planted together to prevent under or over watering.

Quercus agrifolia Tilia cordata ‘Greenspire’ Ulmus parvifolia Zelkova serrata 509
11 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Acer buergerianum Triden Maple 20’ O.C.

Acer palmatum Japanese maple 20’ O.C.

Arbutus ‘Marina’ Strawberry Tree 30’ O.C.

Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 20’ O.C.

Chitalpa tashkentensis Chitalpa 25’ O.C.

Citrus spp. Citrus 15’ O.C.

Cotinus coggygria Smoke Tree 25’ O.C.

Ginkgo biloba Maidenhair Tree 25’ O.C.

Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 25’ O.C.

Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay 25’ O.C.

Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 25’ O.C.

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Aesculus californica California Buckeye 25’ O.C.

Arctostaphylos ‘Dr Hurd’ Manzanita 15’ O.C.

Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 20’ O.C.

Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 20’ O.C.

Gleditsia triacanthos Honey Locust 30’ O.C.

Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 40’ O.C.

Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 50’ O.C.

Quercus robur fastigiata English Oak 15’ O.C.

Quercus suber Cork Oak 50’ O.C.

Schinus molle California Pepper Tree 50’ O.C.

Umbellularia californica California Bay 50’ O.C.

Accent Trees
Enhanced Open Space Trees
Chitalpa tashkentensis
Geijera parviflora
Quercus suber
510
12 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Carpinus betulus European Hornbeam 20’ O.C.

Garrya elliptica Silk Tassel Tree 15’ O.C.

Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Southern Magnolia 20’ O.C.

Metrosideros excelsa New Zealand Christmas Tree 25’ O.C.

Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum 20’ O.C.

Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 20’ O.C.

Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 20’ O.C.

Rhamnus alaternus Italian Buckthorn 15’ O.C.

Rhus lancea African Sumac 25’ O.C.

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME BOX SIZE HEIGHT SPACING WALL OFFSET Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer II’ Allee Lacebark Elm 36 inches 40 feet 35 feet 15 feet Residential Screening Trees
Retaining Wall Trees
The sloped planting area at the retaining wall at Parcel 7 should feature two rows of trees to provide screening. These should be triangulated with a spacing of 35 feet on center between trees and rows. The first row of trees should be offset 15 feet from the retaining wall. At the north end of the wall, only one row of trees should be planted given the limited space.

Nyssa sylvatica
Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer II’
Carpinus betulus
511
13 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
PLANTING LIST  SHRUBS
Accent Shrubs

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Agave spp. Agave 18” O.C.

Aloe striata Carol Aloe 18” O.C.

Anigozanthos spp. Kangaroo Paw 36” O.C.

Bulbine frutescens Stalked Bulbine 36” O.C.

Coreopsis spp. Coreopsis 24” O.C.

Dasylirion wheeleri Spoon Yucca 48” O.C.

Dianella tasmanica Tasman Flax Lily 30” O.C.

Hemerocallis Day Lily 36” O.C.

Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 30” O.C.

Heuchera spp. Coral Bells 24” O.C.

Iris douglasiona Pacific Coast Iris 18” O.C.

Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker 30” O.C.

Lantana spp. Lantana 48” O.C.

Liriope muscari Lily Turf 24” O.C.

Penstemon spp. Penstemon 36” O.C.

Teucrium chamaedrys Germander 24” O.C.

Verbena Verbena 24” O.C.

Bulbine frutescens Lantana spp. Penstemon Teucrium chamadrys 512
14 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Abelia spp. Abelia 36” O.C.

Arbutus unedo ‘Compacta’ Compact Strawberry Bush 48” O.C.

Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanita 96” O.C.

Buddleia davidii Butterfly Bush 60” O.C.

Carpenteria californica Bush Anemore 60” O.C.

Dodonaea viscosa Hopseed Bush 60” O.C.

Euonymus japonica Spindle Tree 60” O.C.

Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava 120” O.C.

Lavatera maritima Tree Mallow 84” O.C.

Ligustrum J. ‘Texanum’ Waxleaf Privet 72” O.C.

Loropetalum chinensis Chinese Fringe Flower 72” O.C.

Myrica californica Wax Myrtle 15’ O.C.

Myrsine africana African Boxwood 60” O.C.

Prostanthera ovalifolia Mint Bush 84” O.C.

Rhamnus californica Coffeeberry 72” O.C.

Ribes spp. Currant 72” O.C.

Tall Shrubs
Arctostaphylos spp. Anigozanthos Camellia japonica Lavatera maritima 513
15 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Asparagus densiflorus ‘Myers’ Foxtail Fern 36” O.C.

Callistemon ‘Little John’ Dwarf Cottlebrush 36” O.C.

Cistus spp. Rock Rose 48” O.C.

Coleonema spp. Breath of Heaven 48” O.C.

Dietes spp. Fortnight Lily 36” O.C.

Epilobium canum California Fuchsia 30” O.C.

Escallonia ‘Jubilee’ Escallonia 60” O.C.

Euphorbia rigida Silver Spurge 36” O.C.

Grevillea ‘Noelii’ Grevillea 36” O.C.

Myrtus communis ‘Compacta’ Dwarf Myrtle 30” O.C.

Nandina spp. Nandina/Heavenly Bamboo 30” O.C.

Nepeta x faassenii Catmint 30” O.C.

Nephrolepis cordifolia ’California’ California Fern 48” O.C.

Olea europaea ‘Montra’ Little Olive 72” O.C.

Perovskia atriplicifolia Russian Sage 36” O.C.

Phormium tenax New Zealand Flax 48” O.C.

Pittosporum tobira Dwarf Mock Orange 60” O.C.

Rhaphiolepsis indica Indian Hawthorn 72” O.C.

Salvia spp. Sage 48” O.C.

Teucrium fructicans Bush Germander 48” O.C.

Sedum spp. Stonecrop 24” O.C.

Viburnum tinus compacta Viburnum 48” O.C.

Westringia fruticosa ‘Mundi’ Coast Rosemary 36” O.C.

Medium Shrubs
Dietes spp. Teucrium fruticans Olea europaea ‘Montra’ Salvia spp. 514
16 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama Grass 30” O.C.

Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ Feather Reed Grasses 36” O.C.

Carex spp. Sedge 24” O.C.

Chondropetalum tectorum Small Cape Rush 36” O.C.

Festuca californica California Fescue 24” O.C.

Juncus patens California Gray Rush 24” O.C.

Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye 48” O.C.

Lomandra longifolia Dwarf Mat Rush 36” O.C.

Muhlenbergia rigens Meadow Muhly 36” O.C.

Pennisetum alopecuroides Dwarf Fountain Grass 30” O.C.

Pennisetum setaceum ‘Rubrum’ Red Fountain Grass 30” O.C.

PLANTING LIST  GRASSES
Lomandra longifolia
Muhlenbergia rigens
Festuca californica
Juncus patens
PLANTING LIST  VINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPREAD
Bougainvillea spp. Bougainvillea 20’
Ficus pumila Creeping Fig 30’
Hardenbergia violacea Purple Vine Lilac 10’
Jasminum spp. Jasmine 20’
Lonicera japonica Honeysuckle 20’
Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 30’
Solanum laxum Potato Vine 25’
Wisteria sinensis Chinese Wisteria 15’
Bougainvillea spp. Hardenbergia violacea Ficus pumila
515
17 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Acacia redolens Acacia 10’ O.C.

Achillea millefolium Yarrow 30” O.C.

Baccharis pilularis Coyote Brush 72” O.C.

Ceanothus griseus California Lilac 60” O.C.

Coprosoma kirkii ‘Verde Vista’ Prostate Mirror Plant 60” O.C.

Dymondia margaretae Silver Carpet 36” O.C.

Erigeron glaucus ‘Sea Breeze’ Seaside Daisy 36” O.C.

Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy 36” O.C.

Gazania spp. Gazania 24” O.C.

Geranium spp. Hardy Scented Geramium 24” O.C.

Juniperus spp. Juniper 60” O.C.

Limonium perezii Sea Lavender 24” O.C.

Mimulus x ‘Jelly Bean Orange’ Sticky Monkey Flower 48” O.C.

Myoporum parvifolium ‘Pink’ Myoporum ‘Pink’ 72” O.C.

Pelargonium peltatum Ivy Geramium 48” O.C.

Oenothera speciosa ‘Childsii’ Mexican Evening Primrose 36” O.C.

Osteospermum fruticosum African Daisy 60” O.C.

Rosa ‘Carpet Rose’ Carpet Rose 48” O.C.

Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Huntington Carpet’ Rosemary 60” O.C.

Senecio serpens Blue Chalk Sticks 24” O.C.

Stachys byzantina Lamb’s Ears 24” O.C.

PLANTING LIST  GROUNDCOVERS
Stachys byzantina Rosmarinus officinalus Senecio serpens Myoporum parvifolium ‘Pink’ 516
18 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Aesculus californica Buckeye 25’ O.C.

Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 25’ O.C.

Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum 25’ O.C.

Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 50’ O.C.

Platanus racemosa Calfornia Sycamore 40’ O.C.

Ulmus propinqua ‘JFS-Bieberich’ Emerald Sunshine Elm 25’ O.C.

PLANTING LIST  STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS
Plants play an important role in the function of landscape-based stormwater treatment measures. All species listed are included in the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Guidebook and are suitable for stormwater treatment measures.

Trees in Stormwater Treatment Areas

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow 30” O.C.

Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ Coyote Brush Prostrate 72” O.C.

Carex pansa California Meadow Sedge 18” O.C.

Chondropetalum tectorum Cape Rush 36” O.C.

Eriogonum fasciculatum Flattop Buckwheat 36” O.C.

Juncus patens Blue Rush 24” O.C.

Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye 48” O.C.

Limonium californicum Marsh Rosemary 24” O.C.

Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 36” O.C.

Nasella pulchra Purple Needlegrass 30” O.C.

Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 48” O.C.

Epilobium densiflorum Dense Spike Primrose 30” O.C.

Shrubs & Grasses in Stormwater Treatment Areas
Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’
Epilobium densiflorum
Juncus patens
517
2 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Pedestrian circulation
Parcel 8

7.16 Ac 7.20 Ac
Parcel 7

6.50 Ac
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection
Pedestrian Routes on Primary Streets
with Sidewalks
Pedestrian Routes Through Paseos
Attachment 4
Exhibit B to Ordinance - Landscape Design Guidelines
518
3 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
Croak Road Hillside Condition
Scale: N.T.S.

STREETS AND ENTRIES
Neighborhood Streets
The neighborhood streets will be carefully designed
to create a well-organized layout that guides both
vehicles and pedestrians throughout the community.

Entry monument with thematic landscaping Street trees in parkway strips or front yard planting areas 519
4 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Landscaping between garage doors Neighborhood paseos

To safeguard the landscaping from interference by
vehicles or pedestrians, raised planting surfaces,
depressed walkways, or curbs should be employed.

Concrete mow-strips should separate turf and shrub
areas, creating a connected network of pathways, and
incorporating focal elements along sight lines.
520
5 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
Pocket parks

POCKET PARKS
Pocket parks are small green spaces nestled into the
fabric of an urban neighborhood that provide public
space for social engagement, relaxation, and exercise.

Pocket parks also offer convenient points of access for emergency vehicles by connecting the inner community
zone to the external arterial roads. This is achieved
through the strategic placement of durable and weatherresistant hardscape materials that can support heavy vehicles, for example, a full-sized fire engine. Hardscape treatments such as decorative pavers provide a unique
plaza experience for visitors while ensuring safety and efficiency for emergency responders.
521
6 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Parcel 7
There is an opportunity for a pocket park within Parcel

Parcel 8 pocket park opportunity areas
Parcel 7 pocket park opportunity area
Pocket Park with
Ped. / Bike Access
Pocket Park with
Ped. / Bike Access
Pocket Park
522
7 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

Model: The Lumec L60 LED Hexagonal Lantern series
on 18.5’ tall post is recommended, to match the current City’s standard.

Mailbox
Clustered mailbox will be used. The mailbox location/
model shall be reviewed and approved by USPS.

Signage
Signage shall conform to City ordinances.

Gates should be included in walls or fences as needed to ensure emergency or maintenance access.

Bike Parking
Bicycle racks play a crucial role in promoting sustainable and active transportation. Provide bicycle parking, where feasible, to support intermodal travel for residents.

Street Lighting
Scale: N.T.S.

Perimeter fence
Benches and trash receptacles
Bicycle parking
523
8 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Typically, fences will be positioned away from the view triangles at intersections to ensure visibility and safety.

Where necessary, breaks in the fence, removable sections, or gates will be incorporated to allow for maintenance
access to adjacent utilities, such as water quality basins.

Open Space Interface Fence - This fence should be
utilized along the wildfire buffer lots where they abut open space. The fence should not exceed 4 feet in height.

Concrete Split Rail Fence - This fence is utilized in the landscape along the southern sidewalks of street B
serving as a thematic element to keep pedestrians out of water quality basins.

Fence is setback a minimum of 5’ from front facade. This fence is used parallel to the front of the home. Where side yards abut a residential street, the lattice fence is also used. Where fence is adjacent to the street a minimum of 3’ landscape buffer is provided between walkway and fence. 2”x6” Cap
Vertical Wood Lattice
4”x4” Post
2”x4” Bottom Rail
1”x6” Kick Board
1”x8” With 1”
Overlap Each Side
8’-0” MAX
6’-0”
Good Neighbor Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

Lattice Top Fence
Scale: N.T.S.
524
9 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580
3’ CONCRETE SPLIT-RAIL FENCE
Location:

Located along the multi-use trail and along paseo
conditions that abut internal open space areas.

Open Space Interface Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

Concrete Split Rail Fence
Scale: N.T.S.

CMU Retaining Wall
Scale: N.T.S.
525
10 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

PLANTING LIST - TREES
Street Trees

Quercus agrifolia Tilia cordata ‘Greenspire’ Ulmus parvifolia Zelkova serrata 526
11 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Acer buergerianum Triden Maple 20’ O.C.

Acer palmatum Japanese maple 20’ O.C.

Arbutus ‘Marina’ Strawberry Tree 30’ O.C.

Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 20’ O.C.

Chitalpa tashkentensis Chitalpa 25’ O.C.

Citrus spp. Citrus 15’ O.C.

Cotinus coggygria Smoke Tree 25’ O.C.

Ginkgo biloba Maidenhair Tree 25’ O.C.

Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 25’ O.C.

Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay 25’ O.C.

Prunus sargentii Sargent Cherry 25’ O.C.

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Aesculus californica California Buckeye 25’ O.C.

Arctostaphylos ‘Dr Hurd’ Manzanita 15’ O.C.

Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 20’ O.C.

Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 20’ O.C.

Gleditsia triacanthos Honey Locust 30’ O.C.

Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 40’ O.C.

Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 50’ O.C.

Quercus robur fastigiata English Oak 15’ O.C.

Quercus suber Cork Oak 50’ O.C.

Schinus molle California Pepper Tree 50’ O.C.

Umbellularia californica California Bay 50’ O.C.

Accent Trees
Enhanced Open Space Trees
Chitalpa tashkentensis
Geijera parviflora
Quercus suber
527
12 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Carpinus betulus European Hornbeam 20’ O.C.

Garrya elliptica Silk Tassel Tree 15’ O.C.

Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Southern Magnolia 20’ O.C.

Metrosideros excelsa New Zealand Christmas Tree 25’ O.C.

Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum 20’ O.C.

Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 20’ O.C.

Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir 20’ O.C.

Rhamnus alaternus Italian Buckthorn 15’ O.C.

Rhus lancea African Sumac 25’ O.C.

Nyssa sylvatica
Ulmus parvifolia ‘Emer II’
Carpinus betulus
528
13 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

PLANTING LIST - SHRUBS
Accent Shrubs

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Agave spp. Agave 18” O.C.

Aloe striata Carol Aloe 18” O.C.

Anigozanthos spp. Kangaroo Paw 36” O.C.

Bulbine frutescens Stalked Bulbine 36” O.C.

Coreopsis spp. Coreopsis 24” O.C.

Dasylirion wheeleri Spoon Yucca 48” O.C.

Dianella tasmanica Tasman Flax Lily 30” O.C.

Hemerocallis Day Lily 36” O.C.

Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 30” O.C.

Heuchera spp. Coral Bells 24” O.C.

Iris douglasiona Pacific Coast Iris 18” O.C.

Kniphofia uvaria Red Hot Poker 30” O.C.

Lantana spp. Lantana 48” O.C.

Liriope muscari Lily Turf 24” O.C.

Penstemon spp. Penstemon 36” O.C.

Teucrium chamaedrys Germander 24” O.C.

Verbena Verbena 24” O.C.

Bulbine frutescens Lantana spp. Penstemon Teucrium chamadrys 529
14 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Abelia spp. Abelia 36” O.C.

Arbutus unedo ‘Compacta’ Compact Strawberry Bush 48” O.C.

Arctostaphylos spp. Manzanita 96” O.C.

Buddleia davidii Butterfly Bush 60” O.C.

Carpenteria californica Bush Anemore 60” O.C.

Dodonaea viscosa Hopseed Bush 60” O.C.

Euonymus japonica Spindle Tree 60” O.C.

Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava 120” O.C.

Lavatera maritima Tree Mallow 84” O.C.

Ligustrum J. ‘Texanum’ Waxleaf Privet 72” O.C.

Loropetalum chinensis Chinese Fringe Flower 72” O.C.

Myrica californica Wax Myrtle 15’ O.C.

Myrsine africana African Boxwood 60” O.C.

Prostanthera ovalifolia Mint Bush 84” O.C.

Rhamnus californica Coffeeberry 72” O.C.

Ribes spp. Currant 72” O.C.

Tall Shrubs
Arctostaphylos spp. Anigozanthos Camellia japonica Lavatera maritima 530
15 DESIGN GUIDELINES
Dublin Fallon 580

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Asparagus densiflorus ‘Myers’ Foxtail Fern 36” O.C.

Callistemon ‘Little John’ Dwarf Cottlebrush 36” O.C.

Cistus spp. Rock Rose 48” O.C.

Coleonema spp. Breath of Heaven 48” O.C.

Dietes spp. Fortnight Lily 36” O.C.

Epilobium canum California Fuchsia 30” O.C.

Escallonia ‘Jubilee’ Escallonia 60” O.C.

Euphorbia rigida Silver Spurge 36” O.C.

Grevillea ‘Noelii’ Grevillea 36” O.C.

Myrtus communis ‘Compacta’ Dwarf Myrtle 30” O.C.

Nandina spp. Nandina/Heavenly Bamboo 30” O.C.

Nepeta x faassenii Catmint 30” O.C.

Nephrolepis cordifolia ’California’ California Fern 48” O.C.

Olea europaea ‘Montra’ Little Olive 72” O.C.

Perovskia atriplicifolia Russian Sage 36” O.C.

Phormium tenax New Zealand Flax 48” O.C.

Pittosporum tobira Dwarf Mock Orange 60” O.C.

Rhaphiolepsis indica Indian Hawthorn 72” O.C.

Salvia spp. Sage 48” O.C.

Teucrium fructicans Bush Germander 48” O.C.

Sedum spp. Stonecrop 24” O.C.

Viburnum tinus compacta Viburnum 48” O.C.

Westringia fruticosa ‘Mundi’ Coast Rosemary 36” O.C.

Medium Shrubs
Dietes spp. Teucrium fruticans Olea europaea ‘Montra’ Salvia spp. 531
16 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Bouteloua gracilis Blue Grama Grass 30” O.C.

Calamagrostis ‘Karl Foerster’ Feather Reed Grasses 36” O.C.

Carex spp. Sedge 24” O.C.

Chondropetalum tectorum Small Cape Rush 36” O.C.

Festuca californica California Fescue 24” O.C.

Juncus patens California Gray Rush 24” O.C.

Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye 48” O.C.

Lomandra longifolia Dwarf Mat Rush 36” O.C.

Muhlenbergia rigens Meadow Muhly 36” O.C.

Pennisetum alopecuroides Dwarf Fountain Grass 30” O.C.

Pennisetum setaceum ‘Rubrum’ Red Fountain Grass 30” O.C.

PLANTING LIST - GRASSES
Lomandra longifolia
Muhlenbergia rigens
Festuca californica
Juncus patens

PLANTING LIST - VINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Acacia redolens Acacia 10’ O.C.

Achillea millefolium Yarrow 30” O.C.

Baccharis pilularis Coyote Brush 72” O.C.

Ceanothus griseus California Lilac 60” O.C.

Coprosoma kirkii ‘Verde Vista’ Prostate Mirror Plant 60” O.C.

Dymondia margaretae Silver Carpet 36” O.C.

Erigeron glaucus ‘Sea Breeze’ Seaside Daisy 36” O.C.

Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy 36” O.C.

Gazania spp. Gazania 24” O.C.

Geranium spp. Hardy Scented Geramium 24” O.C.

Juniperus spp. Juniper 60” O.C.

Limonium perezii Sea Lavender 24” O.C.

Mimulus x ‘Jelly Bean Orange’ Sticky Monkey Flower 48” O.C.

Myoporum parvifolium ‘Pink’ Myoporum ‘Pink’ 72” O.C.

Pelargonium peltatum Ivy Geramium 48” O.C.

Oenothera speciosa ‘Childsii’ Mexican Evening Primrose 36” O.C.

Osteospermum fruticosum African Daisy 60” O.C.

Rosa ‘Carpet Rose’ Carpet Rose 48” O.C.

Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Huntington Carpet’ Rosemary 60” O.C.

Senecio serpens Blue Chalk Sticks 24” O.C.

Stachys byzantina Lamb’s Ears 24” O.C.

PLANTING LIST - GROUNDCOVERS
Stachys byzantina Rosmarinus officinalus Myoporum parvifolium ‘Pink’ Senecio serpens 533
18 LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Aesculus californica Buckeye 25’ O.C.

Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 25’ O.C.

Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum 25’ O.C.

Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 50’ O.C.

Platanus racemosa Calfornia Sycamore 40’ O.C.

Ulmus propinqua ‘JFS-Bieberich’ Emerald Sunshine Elm 25’ O.C.

PLANTING LIST - STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS
Plants play an important role in the function of landscape-based stormwater treatment measures. All species listed are included in the Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Guidebook and are suitable for stormwater treatment measures.

Trees in Stormwater Treatment Areas

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING
Achillea millefolium Common Yarrow 30” O.C.

Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’ Coyote Brush Prostrate 72” O.C.

Carex pansa California Meadow Sedge 18” O.C.

Chondropetalum tectorum Cape Rush 36” O.C.

Eriogonum fasciculatum Flattop Buckwheat 36” O.C.

Juncus patens Blue Rush 24” O.C.

Leymus condensatus ‘Canyon Prince’ Canyon Prince Wild Rye 48” O.C.

Limonium californicum Marsh Rosemary 24” O.C.

Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 36” O.C.

Nasella pulchra Purple Needlegrass 30” O.C.

Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 48” O.C.

Epilobium densiflorum Dense Spike Primrose 30” O.C.

Shrubs & Grasses in Stormwater Treatment Areas
Baccharis pilularis ‘Twin Peaks’
Epilobium densiflorum
Juncus patens
534
Attachment 5
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 34 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 24

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING THE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS FOR THE DUBLIN FALLON 580

PROJECT
PLPA-2023-00033
(APNS 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-002, 985-0027-005, AND 985-0027-004) WHEREAS, the Property Owner, GH PacVest LLC, is requesting approval of General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, an amendment to the existing Planned Development (PD) Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan, approval of a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential use, Vesting Tentative Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667, and a Development Agreement for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project; and WHEREAS, the proposed project would eliminate the Public/Semi-Public land use designation and convert 42.6 acres designated Open Space to Parks/Public-Recreation, establish development standards for the future development of 238 residential units and approximately 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/campus office use. The 192-acre site would be subdivided into 11 parcels. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Fallon 580 Project” or the “Project”; and
WHEREAS, the 192-acre site is located in eastern Dublin east of Fallon Road, north of I580, and along the future Dublin Boulevard Extension; and WHEREAS, the existing General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan land use designations are Medium High Density, General Commercial/Campus Office, Community Park, Parks/Public Recreation, Open Space, and Public Semi Public; and WHEREAS, the project site is located within Planned Development Ordinance No. 32-05 for Fallon Village which allows for up to 238 residential units and up to 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/office development; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 8663 will allow for the orderly division of the Dublin Fallon 580 Project Property into 11 parcels consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 8666 and 8667 will allow for the orderly division of the Dublin Fallon 580 Project Property for Medium High Density residential, consistent with the City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, prior CEQA analysis for the Project area includes: 1) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (1993); 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002); and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs;” and 535
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 34 WHEREAS, in compliance with CEQA, the City prepared a CEQA Addendum for the Project (the “Addendum”), which is incorporated by reference. The Addendum reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the development potential of the Project, and concludes that the Project would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the EDSP EIRs and no other CEQA standards for supplemental review are met; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing on June 11, 2024, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 24-05, recommending approval of the Dublin Fallon 580 Project, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours; and
WHEREAS, a Staff Report dated July 16, 2024 and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed for City Council the following: 1) the General Plan Amendment/ Easten Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, 2) the Planned Development Zoning District with Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan, 3) a Development Agreement, and 4) a CEQA Addendum; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024 the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including 1) the proposed Addendum to the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, 2) the General Plan Amendment/Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Amendment, 3) the Planned Development Zoning with a Stage 1 Development Plan Amendment and Stage 2 Development Plan, 4) Vesting Tentative Tract Maps, and 5) a Development Agreement, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Addendum and all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of Dublin does hereby make the following findings and determinations regarding the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8667, and 8668 for the Project:

A. The proposed subdivision maps together with the provisions for their design and improvement are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan in that Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667: 1) are consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision regulations and related ordinances; 2) are consistent with the land use designations and acreages of the Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; 3) provide for the future extension of Dublin Boulevard; and 4) respect the Airport Protection Area Line as the limit of residential development.

B. The subdivision site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development in that: 1) the design and improvements of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667 are consistent with the General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan objectives, polices, general land uses, and programs as they relate to the subject property because 536
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 34 they would create subdivisions for implementation of Medium-High Density Residential, General Commercial/Campus Office, Parks/Public Recreation, and Open Space uses and the subject property is designated for these types of developments; 2) the Project site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development and is consistent with the land use designations of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and consistent with the Stage 1 and Stage 2 Development Plan as amended and adopted with this Project; 3) the subject property is a hillside development and generally slopes from the north east corner to I-580; 4) the project proposes to mass grade the site and flatten it where necessary to allow for intended future users and create the Dublin Blvd extension road subgrade; 5) The grading proposed for the project will take into consideration the hilly terrain and will be designed to avoid excessive cuts and fills; and 6) a slope is proposed between the residential and industrial which provides a buffer between the uses.

C. The tentative tract maps are consistent with the intent of applicable subdivision design or improvements of the tentative tract map are consistent with the city’s general plan and any applicable specific plan in that land uses that would be developed of parcels created by Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, 8667 are consistent with the General Provisions and Development Standards for the Planned Development Zoning District for the Fallon Village area of which the site is a part, and the proposed Stage 2 Development Plan adopted with this Project.

D. The subdivision design and proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat:
in that: 1) the Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667 will not cause environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife of their habitat; 2) the project site is located adjacent to major roads, including I-580 and the future extension of Dublin Boulevard, on approximately 192 acres of land; and 3) the topography of the property consists of rolling hills; however with an approved grading plan this site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of Medium-High Density Residential, General Commercial/Campus Office, Parks/Public Recreation, and Open Space uses.

E. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause serious public health concerns in that: 1) the proposal is consistent with the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan policies and the City’s ordinances enacted for the public health, safety, and welfare; 2) the project will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity nor will it be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare; 3) no noxious odors, hazardous materials, or excessive noises will be produced; and 4) in order to ensure adequate emergency vehicle access to all portions of the site, access will be provided via private internal streets from Central Parkway, Croak Road via the future Central Parkway Extension, and the future Dublin Boulevard Extension 5) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines the City prepared a CEQA Addendum for the Project and, therefore, the proposed subdivision will not result in environmental damage or substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat or cause public health concerns.

F. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; or alternate easements are provided pursuant to Government Code in that: 1) the design of the subdivisions will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, or access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and 2) the City Engineer has reviewed the map and title report and has not found any conflicting easements of this nature.
537
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 4 of 34 G. The design or improvements of the tentative maps are consistent with the city’s general plan and any applicable specific plan in that: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Maps will subdivide the property, which is consistent with the Stage 1 Development Plan approved for the Fallon Village area, and the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and 2) the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps will not alter the use of the site, which is allows residential, commercial/office, parks, and open space uses.

H. The subdivision is designed to provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in that: 1) the future buildings on the parcels will be oriented in a way that allows for natural heating and cooling opportunities; and 2) any future development will be required to comply with the California Green Building Code.

I. The tentative tract map, including design and improvement, shall comply with all the applicable provisions and requirements of the zoning ordinance, the latest municipal stormwater permit issued to the city by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this title, any other ordinance of the city, and the Subdivision Map Act in that: 1) the proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 8663 create eleven parcels and Vesting Tentative Tract Maps Nos. 8666 and 8667 creates the residential portion of Vesting Tract Map 8663, which are consistent with the Stage 1 Development Plan approved for the Fallon Village area, the Stage 2 Development adopted for this Project, and the City of Dublin Zoning Ordinance, General Plan, and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan; and 2) the Project is compliant with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit; 3) the Project would include bioretention areas and stormwater treatment vaults to ensure consistency with regional C.3 stormwater treatment; and 4) the Project would include full trash capture devices to ensure consistency with regional C.10 stormwater treatment requirements.

NOW BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby conditionally approves Vesting Tentative Tract Maps 8663, 8666, 8667 for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project, prepared by MacKay & Somps, dated April 2024, March 2024, and February 2024, respectively and are subject to the conditions included below, and in accordance with the Project Plans, incorporated herein by reference and attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:

Unless stated otherwise, all Conditions of Approval shall be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits and shall be subject to Planning Division review and approval. The following codes represent those departments/agencies responsible for monitoring compliance of the conditions of approval: [PL] Planning; [B] Building; [PO] Police; [PW] Public Works; [ESD] Environmental Services Division; [ADM] Administration/City Attorney; [FIN] Finance; [PCS] Parks and Community Services; [F] Dublin Fire Prevention; [DSR] Dublin San Ramon Services District; [LDD] Livermore Dublin Disposal; [CO] Alameda County Department of Environmental Health; [Zone 7] Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7; [LAVTA] Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority; and [CHS] California Department of Health Services. # CONDITION TEXT RESPON.

AGENCY
WHEN REQ’D
Prior to:

GENERAL CONDITIONS
538
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 5 of 34

1. Approval. This approval is for the Dublin Fallon
580 (PLPA-2023-00033). This approval shall be as
generally depicted and indicated on the Vesting
Tentative Tract Maps 8663, 8666, 8667 prepared
by McKay & Somps, dated April 2024, March 2024,
and February 2024, respectively, attached as
Exhibit A and other plans, text, and diagrams
relating to this Project, and as specified as the
following Conditions of Approval for this project.

PL On-going

2. Permit Expiration. The Vesting Tentative Tract
Maps term shall coincide with the Term of Project
Approvals defined in the Development Agreement.

PW Defer to the DA

3. Hold Harmless/Indemnification. The
Applicant/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless the City of Dublin and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Dublin or its
advisory agency, appeal board, Planning
Commission, City Council, Community
Development Director, Zoning Administrator, or
any other department, committee, or agency of the
City to the extent such actions are brought within
the time period required by Government Code
Section 66499.37 or other applicable law:
provided, however, that the Applicant/Developer’s
duty to so defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
shall be submitted to the City’s promptly notifying
or proceeding and the City’s full cooperation in the
defense of such actions or proceedings.

ADM, PW On-going

4. Clarifications and Changes to the Conditions.

In the event that there needs to be clarification to
these Conditions of Approval, the City Engineer
and Community Development Director have the
authority to clarify the intent of these Conditions of
Approval to the Applicant/Developer without going
to a public hearing. The City Engineer and
Community Development Director also have the
authority to make minor modifications to these
conditions without going to a public hearing in
order for the Applicant/Developer to fulfill needed
improvements or mitigations resulting from
impacts of this project.

PL, PW On-going

PLANNING- PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

5. Mitigation Monitoring Program. Applicant/
Developer shall comply with CEQA Addendum for
Dublin Fallon 580 Project dated April 8, 2024
including all mitigation measures, action programs,
and implementation measures contained therein.

PL, PW Approval of
Improvement
Plans and Ongoing

6. Inclusionary Housing. The proposed project shall
comply with the City of Dublin Inclusionary Zoning
PL On-going
539
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 6 of 34 Regulations as follows:

The inclusionary housing requirement is 12.5
percent of the total number of units within the
development and shall be satisfied as follows
unless an alternate method of compliance is
approved by City Council consistent with the
Inclusionary Zoning Regulations:
• In-Lieu Fee: 40 percent of the total number
of inclusionary units within the development
shall be satisfied via payment of an “In-Lieu
Fee” as provided by the City’s Impact Fee
Schedule.
• On-site Affordable Units: 60 percent of the
total number of inclusionary units within the
development shall be developed on site.
• On-site Affordable Units shall be dispersed
throughout the neighborhood and
constructed concurrently with the market
rate units.
• Execution of an agreement imposing
appropriate resale controls and/or rental
restrictions on the affordable units shall be
required in accordance with DMC Chapter

8.68.l consistent with the Inclusionary
Zoning Regulations.

7. Open Space Areas. Private open space areas
shall be planted and irrigated to create landscape
that is attractive, conserves water, and requires
minimal maintenance.

PL Approval of
Improvement
Plans
Fire Prevention

8. Fire Apparatus Access Road. All fire apparatus
access road shall be with an approved allweathered surface and capable of supporting imposed load of 75,000 lbs.

F Approval of
Improvement
Plans

9. Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant system design and
installation shall meet requirements of California
Fire Code and Dublin San Ramon Services
District.

F Approval of
Improvement
Plans

10. No fire service lines shall pass beneath buildings. F Approval of Improvement
Plans

11. Buildings in Tract 8666 shall be constructed and
met the requirements of one-or two-family
dwelling/townhouse to meet the 2022 CFC
Appendix D107.1
F Building Permit
Issuance
Dublin San Ramon Services District

12. Regulations that Apply to Development
Projects. The regulations that apply to
development projects are codified in: the Dublin
DSRSD Building Permit
Issuance and
Improvement
540
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 7 of 34 San Ramon Services District Code (DSRSD); the
DSRSD “Standard Procedures, Specifications and
Drawings for Design and Installation of Water and
Wastewater Facilities” as amended from time to
time; all applicable DSRSD Master Plans and all
DSRSD policies. Prior to issuance of any building
permit, complete improvement plans shall be
submitted to DSRSD that conform to the pertinent
documents.

Plans

13. Fees. Planning and review fees, inspection fees,
and fees associated with a wastewater discharge
permit shall be paid to DSRSD in accordance with
the rates and schedules and at time of payment as
established in the DSRSD Code. Planning and
review fees are due after the 1st submittal of plans.

Construction Permit and Inspection Fees are due
prior to the issuance of a Construction Permit.

Capacity Reserve Fees are due before the water
meter can be set or the connection to the sewer
system.

DSRSD Permit Submittal
and Construction
Permit Issuance

14. District Review and Acceptance. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the City; or any
Building Permit or Construction Permit by the
Dublin San Ramon Services District, all
improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall be
signed by the District Engineer. Each drawing of
improvement plans for DSRSD facilities shall
contain a signature block for the District Engineer
indicating approval of the sanitary sewer and/or
water facilities shown. Prior to approval by the
District Engineer, the applicant shall pay all
required DSRSD fees, and provide an engineer’s
estimate of construction costs for the sewer and
water systems, a faithful performance bond, and a
comprehensive general liability insurance policy in
the amounts and forms that are acceptable to
DSRSD. The applicant shall allow at least 15
working days for final improvement drawing review
by DSRSD before signature by the District
Engineer.

DSRSD Building Permit
Issuance or
Construction
Permit Issuance

15. Easements. All easement dedications for DSRSD
facilities shall be by separate instrument
irrevocably offered to DSRSD or by offer of
dedication on the Final Map. Prior to approval by
the City for Recordation, the Final Map shall be
submitted to and approved by DSRSD for
easement locations, widths, and restrictions.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

16. Water and Sewer Services Analysis. The
Developer will be required to enter into a Planning
Services Agreement with DSRSD to conduct a
DSRSD Grading Permit
Issuance
541
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 8 of 34 Water and Sewer Services Analysis to adequately
size the water and sewer facilities for the project.

17. Planned District Major Infrastructure. Planned
District major infrastructure is planned through this
project area to provide sufficient service for this
project. The location and size of the District’s
anticipated Major Infrastructure are shown in the
District’s Master Plans. To provide
timely service and minimize construction conflicts,
the applicant shall enter into an Area Wide Facility
Agreement (AWFA) with the District for the
installation of the major infrastructure through the
project.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

18. Installation in Main Thoroughfares. Where the
narrow width of a proposed alley or cul-de-sac is
so restrictive that the standard separation
requirements for water mains and sewer mains
cannot be maintained, the water and sewer mains
shall be installed within main thoroughfares,
outside of alleyways or cul-de-sacs. Water and
sewer mains may not be installed within
courtyards. Water meters shall be installed around
the outer perimeter of buildings. Installation of
water lines from the meter to each unit shall be
documented and submitted to the District.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

19. Provide Sufficient Capacity. All mains shall be
sized to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate future flow demands in addition to
each development project's demand. Layout and
sizing of mains shall be in conformance with
DSRSD utility master planning.

DSRSD Grading Permit
Issuance

20. Submission of Proposed Easements. Prior to
approval by the City of a grading permit or a site
development permit, the locations and widths of all
proposed easement dedications for water and
sewer lines shall be submitted to and approved by
DSRSD.

DSRSD Grading Permit
Issuance

21. Locate Facilities in Public Streets. Water and
sewer mains shall be located in public streets
rather than in off-street locations to the fullest
extent possible. If unavoidable, then sewer or
water easements must be established over the
alignment of each sewer or water main in an offstreet or private street location to provide access for future maintenance and/or replacement.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

22. Looped or Interconnect Pipelines. Domestic
and fire protection waterline systems for Tracts or
Commercial Developments shall be designed to be
looped or interconnected to avoid dead end
sections in accordance with requirements of the
DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans
542
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 9 of 34 DSRSD Standard Specifications and sound
engineering practice.

23. Sewers to Operate by Gravity Flow. Sewers
shall be designed to operate by gravity flow to
DSRSD’s existing sanitary sewer system.

Pumping of sewage is discouraged and may only
be allowed under extreme circumstances following
a case-by-case review with DSRSD staff. Any
pumping station will require specific review and
approval by DSRSD of preliminary design reports,
design criteria, and final plans and specifications.

The DSRSD reserves the right to require payment
of present worth 30-year operations and
maintenance costs as well as other conditions
within a separate agreement with the applicant for
any project that requires a pumping station.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

24. Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). The
District employs Advanced Metering Infrastructure
(AMI), a fixed water meter reading system. The
system uses radio communication between the
individual water meter boxes or vaults and Tower
Gateway Base Stations (TGBs) to transmit data on
water consumption and meter readings. Due to the
high density and tall profile of the buildings in this
project, the buildings themselves may hinder
effective communication between the individual
meter boxes and the TGBs. Applicant shall fund an
AMI Propagation Study provided by the District to
determine if supplementary AMI communication
equipment is required. If findings show that
additional communication equipment is required,
the developer shall be responsible for providing
site and installation off supplementary equipment
specific to the District’s AMI system, as approved
by both the City of Dublin and the District.

DSRSD Building Permit
Issuance

25. Water and/or Sewer Capacity Demands. This
project will be analyzed by DSRSD to determine if
it represents additional water and/or sewer
capacity demands on the District. Applicant will be
required to pay all incremental capacity reserve
fees for water and sewer services as required by
the project demands. All capacity reserve fees
must be paid prior to installation of a water meter
for water. If a water meter is not required, the
capacity reserve fee shall be paid prior to issuance
of a building permit. The District may not approve
the building permit until capacity reserve fees are
paid.

DSRSD Building Permit
Issuance or
Construction
Permit Issuance

26. Obtain Permit to Construct Demands. No sewer
line or waterline construction shall be permitted
DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
543
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 10 of 34 unless the proper utility construction permit has
been issued by DSRSD. A construction permit will
only be issued after all of the items listed under the
Fees condition for DSRSD have been satisfied.

Plans

27. Backflow Prevention Devices/Double Detector
Check Valves. Above ground backflow prevention
devices/double detector check valves shall be
installed on fire protection systems connected to
the DSRSD water main. The applicant shall
collaborate with the Fire Department and with
DSRSD to size and configure its fire system.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

28. Proposed Irrigation. Any proposed irrigation for
this project shall be designed for and connected to
potable water. Unless explicitly stated otherwise by
DSRSD, recycled water irrigation is unavailable for
use for this project per DERWA recycled water
moratorium Resolution No. 19-3 dated 3/24/2019.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

29. No Installation Under Pavers, Decorative
Pavement or Concrete. Pipelines and related
appurtenances shall not be constructed
underneath pavers or decorative pavement or
concrete unless a DSRSD grant of easement form
is signed by the property owner.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

30. Offsite Easements. Offsite easements for
connection to DSRSD water facilities may be
required. The applicant shall be responsible for
acquiring all necessary off site easements and
constructing necessary off site water mains in
conformance with all DSRSD requirements.

DSRSD Approval of
Improvement
Plans

31. Water Supply Assessment. The Developer shall
be required to enter into a Planning Services
Agreement with DSRSD to conduct a Water
Supply Assessment to determine available supply
for the project. This shall be completed before or
during the Water Sewer Analysis with DSRSD.

DSRSD Grading Permit
Issuance

PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL CONDITIONS

32. Conditions of Approval. Applicant/Developer
shall comply with the City of Dublin Public Works
Standard Conditions of Approval contained below
(“Standard Condition”) unless specifically modified
by Project Specific Conditions of Approval for the
proposed Dublin Fallon 580 development project
(“Development”) set forth below.

PW On-going

33. Compliance. Applicant/Developer shall comply
with the Subdivision Map Act, the City of Dublin
Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, City of Dublin
Title 7 Public Works Ordinance, which includes the
Grading Ordinance, the City of Dublin Public
Works Standards and Policies, the most current
requirements of the State Code Title 24 and the
PW On-going
544
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 11 of 34 Americans with Disabilities Act with regard to
accessibility, and all building and fire codes and
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit.

All Development-related public improvements
constructed by Applicant/Developer and to be
dedicated to the City are hereby identified as
“public works” under Labor Code section 1771
unless otherwise specified in the Dublin Fallon 580
Development Agreement. Accordingly,
Applicant/Developer, in constructing such
improvements, shall comply with the Prevailing
Wage Law (Labor Code. Sects. 1720 and
following).

34. Fees. The Applicant/Developer shall pay all
applicable fees in effect at the time of permit
issuance or final map approval unless otherwise
specified in the Dublin Fallon 580 Development
Agreement, including, but not limited to: Planning
fees; Dublin San Ramon Services District fees;
Public Facilities fees; Transportation Impact Fees;
City of Dublin Fire fees; Noise Mitigation fees;
Inclusionary House In-Lieu fees; Alameda County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District
fees; Dublin Ranch East Side Storm Drain Benefit
District.

Various
Depts
Grading Permit
Issuance or Final
Map Approval

35. Zone 7 Impervious Surface Fees. The
Applicant/Developer shall complete a “Zone 7
Impervious Surface Fee Application” and submit
an accompanying exhibit for review by the Public
Works Department. Fees generated by this
application will be due at grading permit issuance
or final map approval.

PW
Grading Permit
Issuance or
Final Map
Approval
PUBLIC WORKS – AGREEMENTS

36. Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement. Developer shall enter into an
Agreement with the City of Dublin that guarantees
the property owner’s perpetual maintenance
obligation for all stormwater management
measures installed as part of the project, including
those on-site and within the public Rights of Way.

In addition to stormwater management measures,
drainage v-ditches, mitigation areas, and existing
wetlands shall be included for reference, as
applicable. Said Agreement is required pursuant to
Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional
Stormwater NPDES Permit, Order No. R2-2022-
0018. Said permit requires the City to provide
verification and assurance that all treatment
devices will be properly operated and maintained.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
545
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 12 of 34 The Agreement shall be recorded against the
property and shall run with the land.

37. Improvement Agreement. Applicant/Developer
shall enter into an Improvement Agreement with
the City for all public improvements including any
required offsite storm drainage or roadway
improvements that are needed to serve the
development, as determined by the City Engineer.

The Improvement Agreement shall include security
(Faithful Performance and Labor and Material) to
guarantee completion of all required improvements
for each appropriate phase or stage of the
Development and associated Final Map.

PW Final Map
Approval

38. CC&Rs/Operating Agreement language:

At a minimum, the following statements or similar
must be included in the HOAs/CC&R’s and
POAs/Operating Agreement:
 Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement. The Development is subject to
the Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement dated
______________________ and recorded
on ______________________ as
Document No.
______________________________ in
the records of Alameda County, CA. Under
the Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement, this Development is
responsible for ensuring that the installed
stormwater management measures remain
in effective operating condition in perpetuity.

Commencing on the date the Homeowners
Association/Property Owner’s Association
(select appropriate entity) begins operation,
the Association assumes the rights and
duties of the Property Owner as defined in
the Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement. The Board shall have full right,
power and authority to act on behalf of the
Association, its Members and the town
home, condominium, single-family
homeowners, commercial tenants under the
Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement.
 On-lot bioretention areas (as applicable):

The Homeowner's Association shall be
responsible for the maintenance of all
stormwater management measures,
including the bioretention areas on private
lots. The private, on-lot bioretention areas
PW/ESD
Approval of
Final Map in
which
Stormwater
Infrastructure is
Associated
546
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 13 of 34 shall be maintained in accordance with the
Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement and shall not be modified
without written approval from the City of
Dublin.
 Stormwater Treatment Measure
Maintenance: The stormwater
management measures (bioretention,
ponds, trash capture devices, etc.) shall be
inspected and maintained as detailed in the
Stormwater Management Maintenance
Agreement. The Association shall maintain
an inspection and maintenance record on
file made available to the City upon request.

In addition, all on-site storm drains shall be
cleaned at least annually before
commencement of the rainy season (by
October 1) of each year.
 Storm Drainage Restrictions: As part of the
original construction of the Development,
stormwater management measures were
installed within the Development in
connection with the Development’s
drainage system. Neither the Association
nor any Owner shall do any work, construct
any improvement, place any landscaping or
otherwise perform any action whatsoever
which alters or interferes with the drainage
pattern for any Lot or any portion of the
Common Areas, except to the extent such
alteration in drainage pattern is approved in
writing by the City of Dublin.
 Good Housekeeping: The Homeowner's
Association shall be responsible for litter
control and sweeping of all paved surfaces
within the development. All private storm
drain systems are to be cleaned
immediately before the commencement of
the rainy season (October 15).
 Landscape Maintenance: Landscaping
shall be designed with an efficient irrigation
system to reduce runoff and promote
surface infiltration. Landscaping shall also
be designed and maintained to minimize the
use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides.

Each Owner, and the Association, is
encouraged to use integrated pest
management practices (less toxic pest
management) as a first step in maintaining
landscaping. Chemical pesticides and
547
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 14 of 34 fertilizers should be employed as a last step
in managing weeds and other pests, and
shall not be applied prior to forecast rain.
 Waste Haul Vehicle Back-Up Noise: For
units where individual cart service is
proposed for short alleys without truck turn
around, the property disclosures shall notify
future property owners that waste service
vehicles will include backup noise/beeping
as early as 6AM on trash service day. To
service all three streams (landfill, organics,
recycling), three different trucks will be onsite each collection day.

PUBLIC WORKS – PERMITS AND BONDS

39. Encroachment Permit. Applicant/Developer shall
obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Public
Works Department for all construction activity
within the public right-of-way. At the discretion of
the City Engineer an encroachment permit for work
specifically included in an Improvement Agreement
may not be required.

PW Permit Issuance

40. Grading Permit. Applicant/Developer shall obtain
a Grading Permit from the Public Works
Department for all grading.

PW Permit Issuance

41. Security. Applicant/Developer shall provide faithful performance security to guarantee the
improvements, as well as payment security, as
determined by the City Engineer (Note: The
performance security shall remain in effect until
one year after final inspection).

PW Permit Issuance

42. Permits from Other Agencies.

Applicant/Developer shall obtain all permits and/or
approvals for the Development required by other
agencies including, but not limited to:
 US Army Corps of Engineers
 US Fish and Wildlife Service
 Regional Water Quality Control Board
 Federal Emergency Management Agency
 California Department of Fish and Wildlife
 The five entities above shall collectively be
referred to as “Resource Agencies”
 California Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans)
 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
 Livermore-Amador Valley Transit Authority
(LAVTA)
 Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail
Authority
 Dublin San Ramon Services District
(DSRSD)
PW Permit Issuance
548
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 15 of 34  Alameda County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District Zone 7 (Zone 7)

PUBLIC WORKS - SUBMITTALS

43. Improvement Plan Submittal Requirements. All
submittals of plans shall comply with the
requirements of the “City of Dublin Public Works
Department Improvement Plan Submittal
Requirements”, the “City of Dublin Improvement
Plan Review Check List,” and current Public Works
and industry standards. A complete submittal of
improvement plans shall include all civil
improvements, joint trench, street lighting and onsite safety lighting, landscape plans, and all associated documents as required.

Applicant/Developer shall not piecemeal the
submittal by submitting various components
separately.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

44. Improvement Plan Requirements from Other
Agencies. Applicant/Developer will be responsible
for submittals and reviews to obtain the approvals
of all participating non-City agencies, including but
not limited to: the Alameda County Fire Department
and the Dublin San Ramon Services District.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

45. Composite Exhibit. Construction plan set shall
include a Composite Exhibit showing all site
improvements, utilities, landscaping improvements
and trees, etc. to be constructed to ensure that
there are no conflicts among the proposed and
existing improvements.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

46. Geotechnical Report. Applicant/Developer shall
submit a Design Level Geotechnical Report, which
includes street pavement sections, grading and
additional information and/or clarifications as
determined by the City Engineer.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

47. Ownership and Maintenance of Improvements.

Applicant/Developer shall submit an Ownership
and Maintenance Exhibit for review and approval
by Planning Division and Public Works
Department. Terms of maintenance are subject to
review and approval by the City Engineer.

PL, PW
Approval of Final
Map or Grading
Permit Issuance

48. Building Pads, Slopes and Walls.

Applicant/Developer shall provide the Public Works
Department with a letter from a registered civil
engineer or surveyor stating that the building pads
have been graded to within 0.1 feet of the grades
shown on the approved Grading Plans, and that the
top & toe of banks and retaining walls are at the
locations shown on the approved Grading Plans.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements
549
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 16 of 34

49. Approved Plan Files. Applicant/Developer shall
provide the Public Works Department a PDF format
file of approved site plans, including grading,
improvement, landscaping & irrigation, joint trench
and lighting.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

50. Master Files. Applicant/Developer shall provide
the Public Works Department a digital vectorized
file of the “master” files for the project, in a format acceptable to the City Engineer. Digital raster
copies are not acceptable. The digital vectorized
files shall be in AutoCAD 14 or higher drawing
format. All objects and entities in layers shall be
colored by layer and named in English. All
submitted drawings shall use the Global
Coordinate System of USA, California, NAD 83
California State Plane, Zone III, and U.S. foot.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements

51. Environmental and Sustainability Files.

Applicant/Developer shall provide to the Public
Works Department GIS shape files, provided in a
format acceptable to the City, all MRP Provision
C.3 stormwater features, trash capture devices,
mitigation measures, wetlands, v-ditches and
public waste containers.

PW/ESD Acceptance of
Improvements

52. SB 1383 Compliance Reporting. To comply with
SB 1383, applicant shall keep and maintain a copy
of all records pertaining to the procurement of SB
1383 compliant compost and mulch. Applicant shall
provide to the Public Works Department records
indicating the total compost and mulch procured or
used, the quantity of compost (tons or cubic yards)
and mulch (tons) procured from each facility or
entity, facility or vendor information (name of
facility, address, contact information), a general
description of how the compost and/or mulch was
used, and where compost and mulch was used,
and invoices demonstrating procurement.

PW/ESD Acceptance of
Improvements
PUBLIC WORKS – FINAL MAP, EASEMENTS AND ACCESS RIGHTS

53. Dedications. All rights-of-way and easement
dedications required by these conditions or
determined necessary by the City Engineer shall
be shown at each Final Map phase unless made by
separate instrument in accordance with the Dublin
Fallon 580 Development Agreement.

PW Final Map
Approval

54. Public Service Easements. A Public Service
Easement (PSE) shall be dedicated along the
project’s frontage to allow for the proper placement
of public utility vaults, boxes, appurtenances or
similar items behind the back-of-sidewalk. Private
improvements such as fences, gates or trellises
shall not be located within the PSE.

PW Final Map
Approval
550
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 17 of 34

55. Emergency Vehicle Access Easements. The
Applicant/Developer shall dedicate Emergency
Vehicle Access Easements (EVAE) over the clear
pavement width of all drive aisles as required by
the Alameda County Fire Department and City
Engineer.

PW Final Map
Approval

56. Abandonment of Easements.

Applicant/Developer shall obtain abandonment
from all applicable public agencies of existing
easements and rights-of-way within the project site
that will no longer be used. Prior to completion of
abandonment, the improvement plans may be
approved if the Applicant/Developer can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
that the abandonment process has been initiated.

PW Final Map
Approval

57. Acquisition of Easements. Applicant/Developer
shall be responsible for obtaining all onsite and
offsite easements, and/or obtain rights-of-entry
from the adjacent property owners for any
improvements not located on their property. The
Applicant/Developer shall prepare all required
documentation for dedication of all easements onsite and off-site. The easements and/or rights-ofentry shall be in writing and copies furnished to the Public Works Department.

PW Final Map
Approval

58. Approval by Others. The Applicant/Developer will
be responsible for submittals and reviews to obtain
the approvals of all applicable non-City agencies.

PW Final Map
Approval

PUBLIC WORKS - GRADING

59. Grading Plan. The Grading Plan shall be in
conformance with the recommendation of the
Geotechnical Report, the approved Tentative Maps
, and the City design standards & ordinances. In
case of conflict between the soil engineer’s
recommendation and the City ordinances, the City
Engineer shall determine which shall apply.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

60. Geotechnical Engineer Review and Approval.

The Project Geotechnical Engineer shall be
retained to review all final grading plans and
specifications. The Project Geotechnical Engineer
shall approve all grading plans prior to
City approval.

PW
Grading Permit
Issuance/
Sitework Permit

61. Grading Off-Haul. The disposal site and haul truck
route for any off-haul dirt materials shall be subject
to the review and approval by the City Engineer
prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. If the
Applicant/Developer does not own the parcel on
which the proposed disposal site is located, the
Applicant/Developer shall provide the City with a
Letter of Consent signed by the current owner,
PW
Grading Permit
Issuance/
Sitework Permit
551
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 18 of 34 approving the placement of off-haul material on
their parcel. A Grading Plan may be required for
the placement of the off-haul material.

A Transportation Permit or Encroachment Permit
may be required for the haul route, as determined
by the City Engineer, which shall include a pre- and
post-hauling survey of the pavement condition.

Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for
repairing damaged pavement due to hauling
operations, as determined by the City Engineer.

62. Erosion Control Plan. A detailed Erosion and
Sediment Control Plan shall be included with the
Grading Plan submittal. The plan shall include
detailed design, location, and maintenance criteria
of all erosion and sedimentation control measures.

The plan shall also address site housekeeping best
management practices.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
Demolition Plan. The Applicant/Developer’s Civil
Engineer shall prepare a demolition plan for the
project, which shall be submitted concurrent with
the improvement plan package. The demolition
plan shall address the following:
 Pavement demolition, including streetlights
and landscaped median islands.
 Landscaping and irrigation
 Fencing to be removed and fencing to remain
 Any items to be saved in place and or
protected, such as trees, water meters, sewer
cleanouts, drainage inlets or backflow
prevention devices.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – STORM DRAINAGE & OTHER UTILITIES

63. On-site Storm Drain System. Storm drainage for
the 10-year storm event shall be collected on-site
and conveyed through storm drains to the public
storm drain system. Show the size and location of
existing and proposed storm drains and catch
basins on the site plan. Show the size and location
of public storm drain lines and the points of
connection for the on-site storm drain system.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

64. Overland Release. Grading and drainage shall be
designed so that surplus drainage (above and
beyond that of the 10-year storm event) not
collected in site catch basins, is directed overland
so as not to cause flooding of existing or proposed
buildings.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

65. Storm Drain Easements. Private storm drain
easements and maintenance roads shall be
provided for all private storm drains or ditches that
are located on private property. The
PW Grading Permit
Issuance
552
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 19 of 34 Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for the
acquisition of all storm drain easements from offsite
property owners which are required for the
connection and maintenance of all offsite storm
drainage improvements.

66. Storm Drain Inlet Markers. All public and private
storm drain inlets must be marked with storm drain
markers that read: “No dumping, drains to creek,”
and a note shall be shown on the improvement
plans. The markers may be purchased from the
Public Work Department.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements

67. Fire Hydrants. Fire hydrant locations shall be
approved by the Alameda County Fire Department.

A raised reflector blue traffic marker shall be
installed in the street opposite each hydrant, and
shown on the signing & striping plan.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements

68. Dry Utilities. Applicant/Developer shall construct
gas, electric, telephone, cable TV, and
communication improvements within the fronting
streets and as necessary to serve the project and
the future adjacent parcels as approved by the City
Engineer and the various Public Utility agencies.

PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements

69. Dry Utility Locations. All electric, telephone,
cable TV, and communications utilities, shall be
placed underground in accordance with the City
policies and ordinances. All utilities shall be located and provided within public utility easements or
public services easements and sized to meet utility
company standards.

PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements

70. Utility Vaults and Boxes. All utility vaults, boxes, and structures, unless specifically approved
otherwise by the City Engineer, shall be
underground and placed in landscaped areas and
screened from public view. Landscape drawings
shall be submitted to the City showing the location
of all utility vaults, boxes, and structures and
adjacent landscape features and plantings. The
Joint Trench Plans shall be submitted along with
the grading and/or improvement plans.

PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements

PUBLIC WORKS - STREET IMPROVEMENTS

71. Public Improvements. The public improvements
shall be constructed generally as shown on the
Tentative Maps. However, the approval of the
Tentative Maps is not an approval of the specific
design of the drainage, traffic circulation, parking,
stormwater treatment, sidewalks and street
improvements.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

72. Public Improvement Conformance. All public
improvements shall conform to the City of Dublin
Standard Plans, current practices, and design
PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
553
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 20 of 34 requirements and as approved by the City
Engineer.

73. Public Street Slopes. Public streets shall be a
minimum 1% slope with minimum gutter flow of

0.7% around bulb outs.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

74. Pavement Structural Sections. Asphalt concrete
pavement sections within the public right-of-way
shall be designed using the Caltrans method for
flexible pavement design (including the asphalt
factor of safety), an assumed R-Value of 5. Final
pavement sections shall be based on the actual RValue obtained from pavement subgrade.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

75. Curb Ramps. City standard curb ramps are
required at all intersections. All curb ramps shall
include truncated domes, and meet the most
current City and ADA design standards. Show curb
ramp locations on the plans. Please note that all
curb returns on public streets shall have directional
or dual ADA ramps – one for each crosswalk and
oriented to align parallel with the crosswalk.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

76. Visibility Triangle. All improvements within the
sight visibility triangle at all intersections, including but not limited to walls and landscaping, shall be a
maximum height of 30” from the roadway surface
elevation at the nearest lane.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

77. Traffic Signing and Striping.

Applicant/Developer shall install all traffic signage,
striping, and pavement markings as required by the
City Engineer. Signing plans shall show street
name and stop signs and any other regulatory
signage appropriate for the project. Striping plans
shall show stop bars, lane lines and channelization
as necessary. Striping plans shall distinguish
between existing striping to be removed and new
striping to be installed. All striping shall be
thermoplastic.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

78. Street Lighting. Street light standards and
luminaries shall be designed and installed or
relocated as determined by the City Engineer.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance

PUBLIC WORKS - CONSTRUCTION

79. Erosion Control Implementation. The Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan shall be implemented
between October 1st and April 30th unless
otherwise allowed in writing by the City Engineer.

The Applicant/Developer will be responsible for
maintaining erosion and sediment control
measures for one year following the City’s
acceptance of the improvements.

PW
Start of
Construction and
On-going

80. Archaeological Finds. If archaeological materials
are encountered during construction, construction PW Start of Construction and 554
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 21 of 34 within 100 ft of these materials shall be halted until
a professional Archaeologist certified by the
Society of California Archaeology (SCA) or the
Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA) has
had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of
the find and suggest appropriate mitigation
measures.

On-going

81. Construction Activities. Construction activities,
including the idling, maintenance, and warming up
of equipment, shall be limited to Monday through
Friday, and non-City holidays, between the hours
of 7:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. except as otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Extended hours or
Saturday work will be considered by the City
Engineer on a case-by-case basis. Note that the
construction hours of operation within the public
right-of-way are more restrictive.

PW
Start of
Construction and
On-going

82. Temporary Fencing. Temporary construction
fencing shall be installed along the construction
work perimeter to separate the construction area
from the public. All construction activities shall be
confined within the fenced area. Construction
materials and/or equipment shall not be
operated/stored outside of the fenced area or
within the public right-of-way unless approved in
advance by the City Engineer.

PW
Start of
Construction and
On-going as
Needed

83. Construction Noise Management Plan.

Applicant/Developer shall prepare a construction
noise management plan that identifies measures to
minimize construction noise on surrounding
developed properties. The plan shall include hours
of construction operation, use of mufflers on
construction equipment, speed limit for
construction traffic, haul routes and identify a noise
monitor. Specific noise management measures
shall be provided prior to project construction.

PW
Start of
Construction
Implementation,
and On-going as
needed

84. Traffic Control Plan. Closing of any existing
pedestrian pathway and/or sidewalk during
construction shall be implemented through a Cityapproved Traffic Control Plan and shall be done with the goal of minimizing the impact on
pedestrian circulation.

PW
Start of
Construction and
On-going as
needed

85. Construction Traffic Interface Plan.

Applicant/Developer shall prepare a plan for
construction traffic interface with public traffic on
any existing public street. Construction traffic and
parking may be subject to specific requirements by
the City Engineer.

PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation,
and On-going as
needed
555
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 22 of 34

86. Pest Control. Applicant/Developer shall be
responsible for controlling any rodent, mosquito, or
other pest problem due to construction activities.

PW On-going

87. Dust Control Measures. Applicant/Developer
shall be responsible for watering or other dustpalliative measures to control dust as conditions warrant or as directed by the City Engineer.

PW
Start of
Construction;
Implementation
On-going as
needed

88. Dust Control/Street Sweeping. The
Applicant/Developer shall provide adequate dust
control measures at all times during the grading
and hauling operations. All trucks hauling export
and import materials shall be provided with tarp
cover at all times. Spillage of haul materials and
mud-tracking on the haul routes shall be prevented
at all times. The Applicant/Developer shall be
responsible for sweeping of streets within,
surrounding and adjacent to the project, as well as
along the haul route, if it is determined that the
tracking or accumulation of material on the streets
is due to its construction activities.

PW During Grading
and Site Work

89. Construction Traffic and Parking. All
construction-related parking shall be off-street in an
area provided by the Applicant/Developer.

Construction traffic and parking shall be provided in
a manner approved by the City Engineer.

PW
Start of
Construction and
On-going
PUBLIC WORKS – EROSION CONTROL & STORMWATER QUALITY

90. Stormwater Treatment. Consistent with Provision
C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES
Permit (MRP) Order No. R2-2022-0018 the
Applicant/Developer shall submit documentation
including construction drawings demonstrating all
stormwater treatment measures and
hydromodification requirements as applicable are
met.

PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance

91. Stormwater Site Design and Source Control. All
applicable site design measures and structural and
operational stormwater source controls shall be
implemented as required by the MRP.

PW/ESD Grading/Sitework
Permit Issuance

92. Maintenance Access. Applicant/Developer shall
design and construct maintenance access to all
stormwater management measures and mitigation
swales, as appropriate. Maintenance access for
equipment and personnel to overflow risers,
cleanouts and other structures is required. The
final number, location, width, and surfacing of
maintenance access points from public or private
streets is subject to the approval of the City
Engineer.

PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance
556
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 23 of 34

93. NOI and SWPPP. Prior to any clearing or grading,
Applicant/Developer shall provide the City
evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been
sent to the California State Water Resources
Control Board per the requirements of the NPDES.

A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to the Public
Works Department and be kept at the construction
site.

PW
Start of Any
Construction
Activities

94. SWPPP. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) shall identify the Best Management
Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the project
construction activities. The SWPPP shall include
the erosion and sediment control measures in
accordance with the regulations outlined in the
most current version of the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) Erosion and Sediment
Control Handbook or State Construction Best
Management Practices Handbook. The
Applicant/Developer is responsible for ensuring
that all contractors implement all storm water
pollution prevention measures in the SWPPP.

PW
SWPPP to be
Prepared Prior to
Grading Permit
Issuance;
Implementation
Prior to Start of
Construction and
On-going as
needed

95. Stormwater Management Plan. The Stormwater
Management Plan has been approved in concept
only. A final Stormwater Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the City
Engineer. Approval is subject to the
Applicant/Developer providing the necessary
plans, details, and calculations that demonstrate
the plan complies with the standards issued by the
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control
Board and Alameda Countywide Clean Water
Program. Landscape Based Stormwater
Management Measures shall be irrigated and be
on a separate irrigation controller from traditional
landscape, and meet WELO requirements.

PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance

96. Stormwater Control Plan. A narrative Stormwater
Control Plan with sufficient detail to ensure the
stormwater design, site plan, and landscaping plan
are congruent shall be submitted for review and
approval by the City Engineer. The Stormwater
Control Plan shall consist of a report and exhibit.

Required details of the plan are available at:
https://dublin.ca.gov/1656
PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance

97. SB 1383 Compliance. To comply with SB 1383
procurement requirements, all mulch and compost
used in stormwater management measures and
general landscape areas shall meet SB 1383
procurement requirements. Specifically, compost
must be produced at a permitted composting
PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance
557
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 24 of 34 facility; digestate, biosolids, manure and mulch do
not qualify as compost. Eligible mulch must be
derived from organic materials and be produced at
a permitted transfer station, landfill, or composting
facility. Examples of allowed compost include
arbor mulch and composted mulch. Examples of
allowed mulch include mulch made from recycled
pallets and dimensional lumber, aged tree
trimmings, wood fines, and screened compost
overs. Mulch must meet or exceed the physical
contamination, maximum metal concentration, and
pathogen density standards for land application
specified in 14 CCR 17852(a)(24.5)(A)1 through 3.

98. Trash Capture. The project must include
appropriate full trash capture devices for both
private and public improvements. Specific details
on the trash capture devices selected are required
on the construction plan set demonstrating how
MRP Provision C.10 (trash capture) requirements
are met. A list of approved full trash capture
devices may be found at the California Stormwater
Quality Association website at the following link:
https://www.casqa.org/resources/trash/certifiedfull-capture-system-trash-treatment-controldevices. Please note that lead time for trash capture device delivery can be substantial. The
applicant/contractor shall plan accordingly.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance

99. Phased Construction and Stormwater
Management Measures. Required stormwater
treatment, hydromodification management, and
trash capture devices shall be installed concurrent
with construction of the first phase of
improvements. Temporary facilities are not
permitted.

PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance
PUBLIC WORKS – ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
100. Photometrics. The Applicant/Developer shall
provide a complete photometrics plan for both
onsite and frontage roadways. Include the
complete data on photometrics, including the High,
Average and Minimum values for illuminance and
uniformity ratio.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
101. Garbage Truck Access. The Applicant/Developer
shall provide plans and details on anticipated
garbage truck access and routes, in addition to
example set-out diagrams for waste carts/bins
placement on garbage day demonstrating
adequate space available for carts/bins. Carts and
bins shall not block street or driveway access. On
street parking must be considered (e.g., if on street
parking is allowed, demonstrate that there is
PW/ESD Final Map
Approval
558
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 25 of 34 adequate space for parked cars and three-stream
carts).

PUBLIC WORKS - SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment
District. The Developer shall petition to have the
project area annexed into the Dublin Ranch Street
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District and
shall provide any exhibits required for the
annexation. In addition, Developer shall pay all
administrative costs associated with processing the
annexation.

PW First Final Map
Approval
102. Traffic Impact Fees. Applicant/Developer shall
pay the Eastern Dublin and Tri-Valley
Transportation Development traffic impact fees at
each Final Map phase
PW Final Map
Approval
103. Local Transportation Analysis. Project will
comply with the improvement requirements
identified in the local transportation analysis to
address deficiencies.

PW Final Map
Approval
104. Dublin Ranch East Side Storm Drain Benefit
District. The project is located within the Dublin
Ranch East Side Storm Drain Benefit District. The
project shall meet the Benefit District requirements
and Applicant shall pay fees as stated in Ordinance
No. 06-07.

PW First Final Map
Approval
105. Final Map Signature Omissions. The Applicant
shall send by certified mail, a copy of the proposed
final map, together with a copy of the SMA Section,
to any public entity or public utility which has
previously acquired a right-of-way or easement on
the parcels within the proposed subdivision
informing them of the subdivision and consent to
omit their signatures on the map, as described in
Government Code Section 66436(A)(3)(a)(i). This
shall be completed prior to approval of the large lot
final map and future subdivision maps.

PW
First Final Map
and Successive
Final Maps
106. Conservation Easements. Final Maps shall
delineate boundaries of conservation easements
which may be required for on-site conservation
areas.

PW First Final Map
Approval
107. Public Access Easement to Community Park.

The Applicant/Developer shall dedicate Public
Access Easement from Pandora Way through
Parcel 7 to the Community Park (Parcel 5) on the
large lot final map to ensure Parcel 5 is not
landlocked.

PW First Final Map
Approval
108. Public Street Dedications. Applicant/Developer
shall dedicate public street right-of-way on the
property in fee and public service easements as
required for the construction of the ultimate buildout
PW First Final Map
Approval
559
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 26 of 34 geometry of Fallon Road, Dublin Boulevard, and
Croak Road. Geometry shall include stormwater
treatment within the public right-of-way.

Additionally, two curb ramps per corner at each
intersection are required. Right-of-way dedications
shall accommodate these improvements.
109. Fiber Communication Conduit. Applicant shall
work with the City to install conduit(s) for future City owned fiber communication lines on Croak Road,
Central Parkway, Fallon Road, and Dublin
Boulevard property frontages.

PW Improvement
Plan Approval
110. Existing Easements. Grading and construction of
improvements proposed within existing easements
shall be coordinated and authorized by the
easement holder and any agency having existing
utilities onsite. Applicant shall submit to the City
written authorization from easement holders for
work to be completed within their easements.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
111. Right of Entry. The applicant shall obtain right of entry from adjacent property owner(s) for any
grading work on adjacent property prior to permit
issuance.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
112. Grading at Public Service and Public Utility
Easements. Slopes shall be a maximum of 2%
within public utility easements and public service
easements fronting rights-of-way.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
113. Natural Community Park. The Natural
Community Park as shown on Parcel 4 and Parcel
6 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 8663 shall be
shown on the final map and deeded to the City of
Dublin per the Dublin Fallon 580 Development
Agreement. The City will not accept Parcels 4 and
6 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 8663 until all
associated improvements are completed as
generally shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 8663 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and Park & Community Services Director.

Required improvements include, but are not limited
to, the following.
 12’ wide compacted Class 2 Aggregate
Base (AB) maintenance access road with
associated drainage generally as shown on
the Tentative Maps.
 Fencing and gate access separating
maintenance access road and adjacent
private parcel.
 Fencing at the perimeter of the park to allow
for grazing for vegetation management and
protection from wild game (i.e. feral pigs).

PW First Final Map
Approval
560
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 27 of 34 Caltrans standard detail A86 or approved
equal.
 Off-street access gates shall be located to
provide a pull off area for truck/trailer while
opening/closing the access gates.
 Minimum 1/2 acre graded pad area for
maintenance storage and provide access
from public street to graded pad.
 Utility Stubs: Storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, potable water, recycled water (as
applicable) and electric services shall be
stubbed to each Natural Community Park
parcel at locations approved by the City
Engineer and Park & Community Services
Director.
114. Maintenance Access Easement for Natural
Community Park. Applicant/Developer shall
dedicate maintenance access easements over all
City maintenance entries and roads located on
private parcels providing access to the Natural
Community Park, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.

PW First Final Map
Approval
115. Community Park. The Community Park shown on
Parcel 5 on Vesting Tentative Map 8663 shall be
shown on the final map and deeded to the City of
Dublin by separate instrument. The City will not
accept the future community park until the site is
rough graded, including erosion control measures,
and all associated improvements are completed as
generally shown on Vesting Tentative Map 8663 to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Parks
& Community Services Director. Required
improvements include, but are not limited to the
following.
 Secondary access from the cul-de-sac at
Parcel 10
 Maintenance access
 Utility Stubs: Storm drainage, sanitary
sewer, potable water, recycled water (as
applicable) and electric services shall be
stubbed to the Community Park parcel at
locations approved by the City Engineer and
Park & Community Services Director.

Parkland credits will not be provided until the
required grading and improvements are complete
or an agreement with the City is executed for the
completion of the improvements.

PW First Final Map
Approval
116. Deed Disclosure for Waste Haul Vehicle
Back-Up Noise. Deed disclosures shall be
included for units where individual cart service is
PW Final Map
Approval
561
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 28 of 34 proposed for short alleys without truck turn around.

The property disclosures shall notify future property
owners that waste service vehicles will include
backup noise/beeping as early as 6AM on trash
service day. To service all three streams (landfill,
organics, recycling), three different trucks will be
on-site each collection day.
117. Storm Drain Design. Applicant shall submit final
hydrology/hydraulic report associated with final
design of the project. Runoff coefficients used in
the in the report shall be calculated using actual
surfaces in the project (not assumed values), and
use coefficients shown in Table 7-3 of the CWP C.3
Technical Manual.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
118. Landscape Features within Public Right-ofWay. The Property Owner shall enter into an “Agreement for Long Term Encroachment for
Landscape Features” with the City to require the
Property Owner to maintain the landscape and
decorative features within public right-of-way
including frontage landscaping, decorative
pavements and special features (i.e. walls, portals,
benches, etc.). The Agreement shall identify the
ownership of the special features and maintenance
responsibilities. The Property Owner will be
responsible for maintaining the surface of all
decorative pavements including restoration
required as the result of utility repairs.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
119. ReScape California Landscape Design. All
publicly owned landscape (e.g. parks, right of way,
etc.) shall be designed and rated to meet ReScape
standards. The applicant is encouraged to design
all other landscape areas according to ReScape
Landscape standards.

PW/ESD Grading Permit
Issuance
120. Street Restoration. A pavement treatment, such
as slurry seal or grind and overlay, will be required
within the public streets fronting the site as
determined by the Public Works Department. The
type and limits of the pavement treatment shall be
determined by the City Engineer based upon the
number and proximity of trench cuts, extent of
frontage and median improvements, extent of
pavement striping and restriping, excessive wear
and tear/damage due to construction traffic, etc.

PW
Certificate of
Occupancy or
Acceptance of
Improvements
121. Overhead Utilities. All new and existing overhead
utilities shall be placed underground. PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
122. Hydromodification Management Standards.

This project is subject to hydromodification
management measures. The Applicant/Developer
PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
562
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 29 of 34 shall review the Bay Area Hydrology Model
(BAHM) Review Worksheet for all projects that
must meet Hydromodification Management
Standards. The worksheet is available on the
City’s website at the following webpage:
http://dublin.ca.gov/1656/
123. Special Projects, Non-LID Stormwater
Treatment. No part of this project is considered a
special project. Mechanical devices are not
allowed. The project must use 100% LID for
stormwater treatment.

PW/ESD
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
124. Stormwater Management Design.
 City standard details shall be used for
bioretention areas along Croak Road and
other public streets.
 Interceptor trees are not allowed.
 Trees located within bioretention areas are
discouraged.
 Any bubble-ups proposed shall be located
outside of the treatment measure, in native
soil.
 For plant selection in bioretention areas,
reference the City of Dublin Guidance for
Plant Selection, Spacing and Irrigation in
Stormwater Treatment Facilities located on
the City’s website at the following link:
https://dublin.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/34418
/City-of-Dublin-Guidance-for-Plant-Selection622023?bidId= PW/ESD Final Map
Approval
125. Mitigation Measures. The applicant shall provide
to the Planning Division and the Public Works
Department a copy of the mitigation measures
maintenance manual and schedule for reference,
including maintenance procedures and protocols to
follow after mitigation reporting is complete.

PW/ESD Acceptance of
Improvements
126. Croak Road. Croak Road is designated as a
residential collector street with an existing right-ofway width of 40 feet and pavement width of 34 feet.

The developer shall dedicate sufficient right-of-way
and provide public street improvements along the
project frontage to achieve minimum 44 feet curb
to curb with additional turn lanes as needed. Street
improvements shall include, but are not limited to:
removal and replacement of existing AC pavement,
installation of new pavement, curb and gutter, bike
lanes, minimum 8-foot wide multi-use trail,
accessible ramps, landscape, irrigation, street
lights and utility lateral(s) to serve the development.

PW First Final Map
Approval
PUBLIC WORKS – TRACT 8666 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
563
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 30 of 34 127. Geologic Hazard Abatement District. Prior to
filing of final map for Tract 8666, Developer shall
annex Tract 8666 and Parcel 10 of Tract 8663 into
the Fallon Village Geologic Hazard Abatement
District (GHAD). The board of directors for the
GHAD shall be the City Council and the City of
Dublin. The GHAD shall be responsible for the
ongoing maintenance of open space areas
(including benches and brow ditches, maintenance
roads or trails, and fencing) and water quality
control ponds, and shall include a reserve for
unforeseen repair of future slope stability.

Developer shall be responsible for submitting all
documents necessary for annexation into the
GHAD, including a plan of control, which shall
include an annual operating budget for buildout of
the project, and the petition. Developer shall also
be responsible for all administrative costs
associated with processing the annexation. An
engineer’ report shall be prepared and adopted by
the GHAD Board, setting the amount of the annual
assessment. The GHAD Board shall approve the
assessment levy prior to or concurrently with the
approval of the large lot final map by the City
Council. Initial assessments against property
owners shall not be lower than ultimate
assessments at buildout. The CC&Rs for the
project shall contain financial mechanisms, such as
deed assessments, enforceable by the City to
ensure the property owners are obligated to pay the
costs of maintenance in the event that the GHAD is
dissolved or does not have sufficient resources to
perform its obligations. The CC&Rs shall also
include provisions that require the property owners’
association to pay the GHAD or City’s attorneys’
fees in the event that either enforces the
Homeowner’s Association’s obligation to fund
maintenance of the open space areas and the
water quality control ponds. The CC&Rs shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and
City Attorney to ensure compliance with this
condition of approval.

PW Tract 8666 Final
Map Approval
128. Private Street and Private Property
Maintenance. Any private property or private
streets shall be privately owned and maintained.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements
129. Pandora Way. Pandora Way is designated as a
minor residential street with an existing right-of-way
width of 33 feet and pavement width of 32 feet. The
Applicant/Developer shall dedicate 9 feet of rightof-way along the project frontage to achieve 42 feet PW Tract 8666 Final
Map Approval
564
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 31 of 34 of total right-of-way and provide public street
improvements. Street improvements shall include,
but are not limited to: removal of existing curb and
gutter, installation of new pavement, curb and
gutter, 4.5-foot wide sidewalk, accessible ramps
and utility lateral(s) to serve the residential
development.
130. Vehicle Parking. All on-site vehicle parking
spaces shall conform to the following:
a. All parking spaces shall be double striped
using 4” white lines set 2 feet apart in
accordance with City Standards and DMC

8.76.070.A.17.
b. 12”-wide concrete step-out curbs shall be
constructed at each parking space where
one or both sides abut a landscaped area or
planter.
c. Where wheel stops are shown, individual 6’
long wheel stops shall be provided within
each parking space in accordance with City
Standards.
d. A minimum 2’ radius shall be provided at
curb returns and curb intersections where
applicable.
e. Parking stalls next to walls, fences and
obstructions to vehicle door opening shall be
an additional 4’ in width per DMC

8.76.070.A.16.

Landscaped strips adjacent to parking stalls shall
be unobstructed in order to allow for a minimum 2-
foot vehicular overhang at front of vehicles.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
131. Signing and Striping Plan. A Traffic Signing and
Striping Plan showing all proposed signing and
striping shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Engineer.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
132. Right-of-Way Dedication at Adjacent Property
(Tract 8197 – Jordan Ranch). Approval of the
Development requires the Applicant/Developer to
construct public right-of-way and make good faith
efforts to acquire the necessary land title and
interests from the adjoining property owner of the
common area to the north. Government Code
section 66462.5 (“Section 66462.5”) provides
that, under circumstances in which neither the City
nor the Developer has the necessary property
interests to complete an improvement required by
the tentative map conditions, the City shall either
(a) require Developer to enter into an agreement
that requires the completion of the improvement at
such time as it has acquired the interests or (b)
PW Final Map
Approval
565
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 32 of 34 acquire the necessary interests within 120 days of
filing the map or waive the condition requiring the
improvement. Developer desires more certainty
regarding when the improvements will be
completed, and the City desires that a diligent,
good-faith effort be made by the Developer to
acquire the necessary interests with the agreement
of the adjacent owner. Accordingly, the City
agrees, upon Developer’s demonstration of such
diligent, good faith efforts to the satisfaction of the City Manager, to commence the process described
under Section 66462.5 within 90 days of providing
such evidence to the City Manager. All costs
associated with acquisition shall be the obligation
of Developer.

PUBLIC WORKS – TRACT 8667 SPECIAL CONDITIONS
133. Geologic Hazard Abatement District. If the
Developer desires to have Tract 8667 annexed into
the Fallon Village Geologic Hazard Abatement
District (GHAD), the Developer shall submit a
geotechnical report for review to verify the parcel is
within a Geologic Hazard Area. If determination is
made that the parcel is within a Geologic Hazard
Area, the annexation of Parcel 8 of Tract 8663 into
the Fallon Village Geologic Hazard Abatement
District (GHAD) shall be completed prior to filing of
Final Map 8667. The board of directors for the
GHAD shall be the City Council and the City of
Dublin. The GHAD shall be responsible for the
ongoing maintenance of open space areas
(including benches and brow ditches, maintenance
roads or trails, and fencing) and water quality
control ponds, and shall include a reserve for
unforeseen repair of future slope stability.

Developer shall be responsible for submitting all
documents necessary for annexation into the
GHAD, including a plan of control, which shall
include an annual operating budget for buildout of
the project, and the petition. Developer shall also
be responsible for all administrative costs
associated with processing the annexation. An
engineer’ report shall be prepared and adopted by
the GHAD Board, setting the amount of the annual
assessment. The GHAD Board shall approve the
assessment levy prior to or concurrently with the
approval of the large lot final map by the City
Council. Initial assessments against property
owners shall not be lower than ultimate
assessments at buildout. The CC&Rs for the
PW Tract 8667 Final
Map Approval
566
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 33 of 34 project shall contain financial mechanisms, such as
deed assessments, enforceable by the City to
ensure the property owners are obligated to pay the
costs of maintenance in the event that the GHAD is
dissolved or does not have sufficient resources to
perform its obligations. The CC&Rs shall also
include provisions that require the property owners’
association to pay the GHAD or City’s attorneys’
fees in the event that either enforces the
Homeowner’s Association’s obligation to fund
maintenance of the open space areas and the
water quality control ponds. The CC&Rs shall be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and
City Attorney to ensure compliance with this
condition of approval.
134. Private Street and Private Property
Maintenance. Any private property or private
streets shall be privately owned and maintained.

PW Acceptance of
Improvements
135. Vehicle Parking. All on-site vehicle parking
spaces shall conform to the following:
f. All parking spaces shall be double striped
using 4” white lines set 2 feet apart in
accordance with City Standards and DMC

8.76.070.A.17.
g. 12”-wide concrete step-out curbs shall be
constructed at each parking space where
one or both sides abut a landscaped area or
planter.
h. Where wheel stops are shown, individual 6’
long wheel stops shall be provided within
each parking space in accordance with City
Standards.
i. A minimum 2’ radius shall be provided at
curb returns and curb intersections where
applicable.
j. Parking stalls next to walls, fences and
obstructions to vehicle door opening shall be
an additional 4’ in width per DMC

8.76.070.A.16.

Landscaped strips adjacent to parking stalls shall
be unobstructed in order to allow for a minimum 2-
foot vehicular overhang at front of vehicles.

PW Grading Permit
Issuance
136. Signing and Striping Plan. A Traffic Signing and
Striping Plan showing all proposed signing and
striping shall be submitted for review and approval
by the City Engineer.

PW
Grading Permit
or Encroachment
Permit Issuance
137. Central Parkway. Central Parkway is designated
as a residential collector street with an existing
right-of-way width of 51 feet and pavement width of
31 feet. The developer shall dedicate 13 feet of
PW Tract 8667 Final
Map Approval
567
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 34 of 34 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of July 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
right-of-way along the project frontage to achieve
64 feet of total right-of-way and provide public
street improvements. Street improvements shall
include, but are not limited to: removal of existing
AC berm and V-ditch, installation of new pavement,
curb and gutter, 8-foot wide sidewalk, accessible
ramps, landscape, irrigation, street lights and utility lateral(s) to serve the residential development.
568

PARCEL PROPOSED OWNER MAINTAINED BY PROPOSED USE
PARCEL 1 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/COPARCEL 2 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/COPARCEL 3 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/CO PARCEL 4 CITY CITY PARKS/PUBLIC RECREATIONPARCEL 5 CITY CITY COMMUNITY PARKPARCEL 6 CITY CITY PARKS/PUBLIC RECREATIONPARCEL 7 GH PACVEST HOA MH RESIDENTIAL PARCEL 8 GH PACVEST HOA MH RESIDENTIALPARCEL 9 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/CO PARCEL 10 GH PACVEST HOA OS (PRIVATE STREET/SWQ BASIN)PARCEL 11 GH PACVEST HOA GC/CO (PRIVATE STREET/SWQ BASIN) $WWDFKPHQW
([KLELW$WR5HVROXWLRQ9HVWLQJ7HQWDWLYH7UDFW0DSV
569
570
571
B
B2
C
D
A4
A1
E
C2
C1
B1
A2
A3
572
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
M
N
O
P
Q
EARTHWORK NOTES:

1. STRIPPING OF VEGETATION IS ASSUMED AT 0.1' REMOVAL OVER ALL OF THE GRADED AREA.

2. SHRINKAGE / EXPANSION NUMBERS ARE ASSUMED TO OFFSET EACH OTHER. FUTURE INFORMATION FROM THE DESIGN LEVEL
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT MAY INFLUENCE THIS ASSUMPTION.

3. CONSOLIDATION IS ASSUMED AT 0.1' OVER THE GRADED AREAS OF THE SITE.

ESTIMATED ROUGH EARTHWORK QUANTITIES:
573
574
575
576

PARCEL PROPOSED OWNER PROPOSED USE MAINTAINED BY
PARCEL 1 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/COPARCEL 2 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/COPARCEL 4 CITY CITY PARKS/PUBLIC RECREATIONPARCEL 5 CITY CITY COMMUNITY PARKPARCEL 6 CITY CITY PARKS/PUBLIC RECREATIONPARCEL 7 GH PACVEST HOA MH RESIDENTIALPARCEL 8 GH PACVEST HOA MH RESIDENTIALPARCEL 9 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/CO HATCH
R.O.W. CITY PUBLIC STREET PUBLIC STREETPARCEL 3 GH PACVEST COMM. HOA GC/COR.O.W. GH PACVEST HOA PRIVATE STREETPARCEL 11 GH PACVEST HOA PRIVATE STREET & SWQPARCEL 10 GH PACVEST HOA PRIVATE STREET & SWQ 577
LEGEND

STRAW WATTLESHYDROSEED (APPROXIMATE LIMITS)GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCECATCH BASIN SEDIMENT BARRIERPERIMETER SILT FENCEDRAINAGE DIRECTION 578
579
580
5 6
1 2
3 4
7 581
B
C
D
5 5
6 1
4 5
5 5
6 5
2 7
3 6
7 G
G
F E
E
H
E
J
I
582
583
GRAVEL

CONSTRUCTION

ENTRANCE
LEGEND

STRAW WATTLES/SILT FENCEGRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCECATCH BASIN SEDIMENT BARRIERDRAINAGE DIRECTION/OVERLAND RELEASE 584
DMA

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

PERVIOUS

AREA (SF)
TOTAL

AREA (SF)

EFFECTIVE

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

TREATMENT AREA

REQUIRED (SF)

TREATMENT AREA

PROVIDED (SF)
B B

PERVIOUS

RETENTION

BASIN (SF)
585
586
587
588
5 6
1 3 4
2 7 8
589
1 2
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 5
4 A
B
C
E
6 8
D
D
F
7 G
3 4
H
I
J
590
591
LEGEND

STRAW WATTLES/SILT FENCEGRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCECATCH BASIN SEDIMENT BARRIERDRAINAGE DIRECTION/OVERLAND RELEASE 592
A
A
DMA

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

PERVIOUS

AREA (SF)
TOTAL

AREA (SF)

EFFECTIVE

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

TREATMENT AREA

REQUIRED (SF)

TREATMENT AREA

PROVIDED (SF)

PERVIOUS

RETENTION

BASIN (SF)
593
594
Attachment 7
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. XX – 24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN

APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND GH PACVEST DEVELOPMENT COMPANY RELATED TO THE DUBLIN FALLON 580 PROJECT (PLPA-2023-00033)
(APNs 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-004-00, 985-0027-005-00) The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. A request has been made by GH PacVest LLC to enter into a Development Agreement with the City of Dublin for the property known as the Dublin Fallon 580 Project site, which includes properties identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers 985-0027-002-00, 905-0001-006-03, 985-0027-004-00, and 985-0027-005-00, an approximately 192-acre site.

B. The Property Owner, GH PacVest LLC, is requesting approval of General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan amendments, an amendment to the existing Planned Development (PD) Zoning Stage 1 Development Plan, approval of a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential use, Vesting Tentative Map Nos. 8663, 8666, and 8667, and a Development Agreement for the Dublin Fallon 580 Project. The proposed project would eliminate the Public/Semi-Public land use designation and convert 42.6 acres designated Open Space to Parks/Public-Recreation, establish development standards for the future development of 238 residential units and approximately 3,299,670 square feet of commercial/campus office use.

The 192-acre site would be subdivided into 11 parcels. These planning and implementing actions are collectively known as the “Dublin Fallon 580 Project.” C. The Project site is approximately 192 acres and is located east of Fallon Road, north of I580, and along the future Dublin Boulevard Extension.

D. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City prepared an Addendum for the Project, which reflected the City’s independent judgment and analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the Project. Prior CEQA analysis for the Project area includes: 1) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR (1993); 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002); and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs.” E. The proposed Development Agreement is attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit A.

F. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement on June 11, 2024, for which public notice was given by law.

G. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Dublin Fallon 580 Project including the Development Agreement by Resolution No. 24-05.

H. A public hearing on the proposed Development Agreement was held before the City Council on July 16, 2024 for which public notice was given as provided by law. 595
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 2 of 3 I. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission, including the Planning Commission’s reasons for its recommendation, the Agenda Statement, all comments received in writing, and all testimony received at the public hearing.

SECTION 2: FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS
Therefore, on the basis of: (a) the foregoing Recitals which are incorporated herein, (b) the City of Dublin General Plan; (c) the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, (d) the Dublin Fallon 580 Addendum; (e) the Staff Report; (f) information in the entire record of proceeding for the Project, and on the basis of the specific conclusions set forth below, the City Council finds and determines that:

A. The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified and contained in the City’s General Plan, and in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan in that: (a) the Development Agreement incorporates the objectives policies, general land uses and programs in the General Plan and Specific Plan and does not amend or modify them; and (b) the Project is consistent with the fiscal policies of the General Plan and Specific Plan with respect to the provision of infrastructure and public services.

B. The Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use districts in which the real property is located because the Development Agreement does not amend the uses or regulations in the applicable land use district.

C. The Development Agreement is in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good land use policies in that the Developer’s Project will implement land use guidelines set forth in the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and the General Plan as articulated in Resolution No. xx-24, amending the General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, adopted by the City Council on July 16, 2024.

D. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare in that the Developer’s proposed Project will proceed in accordance with all the programs and policies of the General Plan, Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and future Project Approvals and any Conditions of Approval.

E. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values in that the project will be consistent with the General Plan, the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, and future project approvals.

F. The Development Agreement specifies the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, and the obligations of the Applicant. The Development Agreement contains an indemnity and insurance clause requiring the developer to indemnify and hold the City harmless against claims arising out of the development process, including all legal fees and costs.

SECTION 3. APPROVAL
The City Council hereby approves the Development Agreement (Exhibit A to the Ordinance) and authorizes the City Manager to execute it.
596
Reso. No. XX-24, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2024 Page 3 of 3 SECTION 4. RECORDATION
Within ten (10) days after the Development Agreement is fully executed by all parties, the City Clerk shall submit the Agreement to the County Recorder for recordation.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE AND POSTING OF ORDINANCE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after the date of its passage. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause the Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___th day of ____ 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
597
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF DUBLIN
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Dublin
ƽƼƼ$1$
'
5 0
'$)ǛǅǀǁǂǄ

$1 + -ǈǍǉǎǉ
+

*1 /#$.'$) !*-
*- -Ǩ.0.

BETWEEN THE

CITY OF DUBLIN
AND
, LLC
FOR THE

ǁǄƼ

.ǜǅƼǁ-ƼƼƽ-ƼƼǂ-ƼƿǛǅǄǁ-ƼƼƾǃ-ƼƾǛǅǄǁ-ƼƼƾǃ-ƼǀǛ
)ǅǄǁ-ƼƼƾǃ-Ƽǁ
$WWDFKPHQW
([KLELW$WR2UGLQDQFH'HYHORSPHQW$JUHHPHQW
598
ƾ

ǹ/#$.“Agreement” *-/#$.
“Development Agreement”Ǻ$.(

) )/ - $)/*!*-- ! - )
+0-+*. . on
/#$.
4*! , ƾƼƾǀǛ
4
)
/2 )/# $/4*!0
'$)Ǜ
0)$
$+
'
*-+*-
/$*)ǹ# -
ơ -“City”),
)

./Ǜ

Ǜ
'
2 -
$($/

$'$/4*(+
)4 ǹ# -
ơ - “Developer”Ǻ+0-.0
)//*/#
0/#*-$/4*!ȔȔǂǁǄǂǀ
et seq. *!/#
'$!*-)$
*1 -)( )/*
)0
'$)0)$
$+
'* Ǜ#
+/ -
Ǆǚǁǂǚ$/4
) 1 '*+ -
- Ǜ!-*(/$( -to-/$( Ǜ$)$1$0
''4- ! -- /*$)/#$.
"- ( )/
.
“Party,”
)
-
*''
/$1 '4- ! -- /*
.“Partiesǚ”

RECITALS
ǚ
'$!*-)$
*1 -)( )/*
/$*). ǂǁǄǂǀet seq. ǹ“Development
Agreement Statute”Ǻ
)#
+/ -Ǆǚǁǂ*!/# 0
'$)0)$
$+
'* ǹ# -
ơ -
“C#apter Ǆǚǁǂ”)
0/#*-$5 /# $/4/* )/ -$)/*
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/!*-
/# 1 '*+( )/*!-
'+-*+ -/42$/#
)4+ -.*)#
1$)"
' "
'*- ,0$/

'
$)/ - ./$).0
#+-*+ -/4$)*- -/* ./

'$.#
-/
$) 1 '*+( )/-$"#/.$).0
#
+-*+ -/4ǚ
ǚ 1 '*+ -*2).
-/
$)-
'+-*+ -/4ǹ/# “Property”Ǻ
*).$./$)"*!

++-*3$(
/ '4ƽǅƾ

- .*!'
)Ǜ
.(*- +
-/$
0'
-'4 .
-$
$)3#$
$/,

"
' .
-$+/$*)*!-*+ -/4Ǜ
//

# # - /*
)$)
*-+*-
/ # - $)
4
- ! - )
ǚ
ǚ 1 '*+ -#
.
++'$ !*-Ǜ
)$/4#
.
++-*1 Ǜ1
-$*0.'
)0.

++-*1
'.$)
*))
/$*)2$/#
+-*%
/
*).$./$)"*!0+/*ƾƿǄ - .$ )/$
'0)$/.

)up to ƿǛƾǅǅǛǂǃƼ .,0
- ! /*!
*(( -
$
'ȍ*ƣ
1 '*+( )/ǹ/#
“ProjectǪǺǛ$)
'0$)"Ǜ2$/#*0/'$($/
/$*)Ǜ
( )( )/. /*/# 0
'$) ) -
'
'
)
)
./ -)0
'$)+
$Ɵ
'
) ǹ .*'0/$*)*ǚǸǸǸ-ƾǀǺ,
)
( )( )//*
'
)) 1 '*+( )/*)$)"-$)
)
*ǚƿƾ-Ƽǁ!*-
''*)$''
"
)

'
)) 1 '*+( )/*)$)"/
" ƾ 1 '*+( )/'
)!*-/# 0
'$)
''*)
ǁǄƼ-*%
/ǹ-ǚ*ǚǸǸǸ-ƾǀ
*+/
4/# $/4*0)
$'*)ǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǛƾƼƾǀ),
./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃ !*-/# Dublin
''*)ǁǄƼ
-*%
/ ǹ .*'0/$*)*ǚǸǸǸ-ƾǀ
*+/ *)ǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǛƾƼƾǀǺǛ
) /#$.
"- ( )/ǹ
++-*1
4/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǹǩDA”) ++-*1$)"
-$)
)
ǹ Ɵ)
'*2Ǻ) ǹ
*''
/$1 '4/# “Project Approvals”)ǚ
ǚ $/4 .$- ./# /$( '4Ǜ ƣ
$ )/Ǜ*- -'4,
)+-*+ - 1 '*+( )/*!
/# -*%
/ǚ
ǚ # $/4Ǜ$)
*''

*-
/$*)2$/#/# $/4*!
$1 -(*- Ǜ$./# '

" )
4/#
/ .$- ./*
*)./-0
/
+-*%
/" ) -
''4 .
-$

./# -*
2 4
3/ ).$*)*!0
'$)*0' 1
-!-*(
''*)*
/*/# 0
'$)
$/4'$($/.Ǜ
599
ƿ

*)/$)0$)"
./ -'4/#-*0"#0)$)
*-+*-
/ '
(
*0)/4
)
*))
/$)"/*
*-/#
)4*).
-&2
42$/#$)/# $/4*!
$1 -(*- Ǜ
*((*)'4- ! -- /*
.
/# +-*+*. 0
'$)*0' 1
- – *-/#
)4*).
-&2
4 3/ ).$*)-*%
/
ǹ"Dublin Boulevard Extension”Ǻǚ On +/ (
-ƿǛƾƼƽǅǛ/# $/4*0)
$'
*+/
-$)
)
*ǚƽƼ-ƽǅ/* ./

'$.#$"#/-of-W
4
$) .!*-0
'$)*0' 1
-

/2 )
''*)*

)/#
./ -)$/4
$($/ǹ“Precise Plan”Ǻǚ
ǚ $/4
) 1 '*+ -#
1 -

#
"- ( )/
) .$- /* 3+- ..
# - $)
1 '*+( )/"- ( )//#
/2$''!

$'$/
/ 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*%
/
.0
%
//*
*)$/$*).. /!*-/## - $)ǚ
ǚ # 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*+ -/4
)/# -*%
/#
.
) 1
'0
/
$)/#- )1$-*)( )/
'$(+

/- +*-/. ǹǩEIR”)
-/$Ɵ
4/# $/4ǜǹƽǺ
./ -)
0
'$) ) -
''
)( )( )/
)+
$Ɵ
'
))1$-*)( )/
'
(+

/
+*-/Ǜ/
/ '
-$)"#*0. *ǚǅƽƽƼƿƼǂǀǝǹƾǺ
./0
'$)-*+ -/$ ./
" ƽ
1 '*+( )/'
)
))) 3
/$*)0++' ( )/
'
ǹ/
/ '
-$)"#*0. *ǚ
ƾƼƼƽƼǁƾƽƽǀǺǝ
)ǹƿǺ
''*)$''
" -*%
/-
ơ0++' ( )/
'EIR ǹ/
/
'
-$)"#*0. 0(
-ƾƼƼǁƼǂƾƼƽƼǺǹ
*''
/$1 '4ǛǩPrior EIRsǪǺǚ# -$*-
.
.+
$Ɵ

''4
- .. /# ) -
''
)Ǜ+
$Ɵ
'
)
)/
" ƽ'
))
1 '*+( )/*)$)"
) 1 '*+( )/'
)!*-/# -*%
/ǚ)
)$/$
'/042
.
+- +
- !*-/#
( )( )//*'
)) 1 '*+( )/*)$)"-$)
)
*ǚƿƾƼǁ /
" ƽ 1 '*+( )/'
)ǝ /
" ƾ'
)) 1 '*+( )/ 5*)$)"
)
1 '*+( )/'
)ǝ ./$)" )/
/$1
-
'
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃǝ
)/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )//* / -($) 2# /# -/# .
++-*1
'.2$''- .0'/$)
)4
) 2*-.0
./
)/$
''4(*- . 1 - .$")$Ɵ

)/ )1$-*)( )/
'$(+

/./#
)/#*.

)
'45 $)/# . +-$*-
.*-
)4*/# -./
)
-- ,0$-$)"!0-/# -
)1$-*)( )/
'- 1$ 20) -
- ( /ǹ0
'$
.*0-
.*
/$*)
ƾƽƽǂǂ
)0$ '$) .S
/$*).ƽǁƽǂƾ
)ƽǁƽǂƿǺǚ#
)$/$
'/04
/ -($) /#
//# .
++-*1
'.$)*//-$"" -
)4*!/# ./
)
-.
- ,0$-$)"!0-/# - )1$-*)( )/
'- 1$ 2ǚ) )0(2
.+- +
- !*-/# .

++-*1
'. 3+'
$)$)"/#

.$.!*-Ɵ)$)")*!0-/# -- 1$ 2$.- ,0$- 0) -
+0-.0
)//*0$ '$) .S
/$*)ƽǁƽǂǀǹ Ǻǚ# $/4*0)
$'

*).$ -
)
++-*1 /# Ɵ)$)".$)/# )0(ǹ .*ǚ*ǚǸǸǸ-ƾǀ

*+/ *)ǸǸǸǸǸǸ ǸǸǛƾƼƾǀǺ+-$*-/*
++-*1$)" /# ) -
''
)
)
./ -)
0
'$)+
$Ɵ
'
)
( )( )/.Ǜ/#
( )( )//*'
)) 1 '*+( )/
*)$)"-$)
)
*ǚƿƾ-Ƽǁ/
" ƽ 1 '*+( )/'
)ǝ /
" ƾ'
))
1 '*+( )/ 5*)$)"
) 1 '*+( )/'
)ǝ ./$)" )/
/$1
-
'
+.
ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃǝ
)/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ
ǚ $/4#
."$1 )/# - ,0$- )*/$
*!$/.$)/ )/$*)/*
*+//#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
)#
.
*)0
/ +0
'$
#
-$)"./# - *)+0-.0
)//*
600
ǀ
*1 -)( )/*
/$*) ǂǁǄǂǃ
)#
+/ -Ǆǚǁǂǚ.- ,0$-
4*1 -)( )/
*
/$*) ǂǁǄǂǃǚǁǛ$/4#
.!*0)/#
//# +-*1$.$*).*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/
)$/.+0-+*. .
-
*).$./ )/2$/#/# "*
'.Ǜ+*'$
$ .Ǜ./
)
-.,

)'
)0. .$")
/$*)..+
$Ɵ $)$/4Ǩ. ) -
''
)ǚ

ǚ On
0) ƽƽǛ ƾƼƾǀǛ/# $/4*!0
'$)'
))$)"*(($..$*)Ǜ/#
$)$/$
'#
-$)"
*4!*-+0-+*. .*!D 1 '*+( )/A"- ( )/- 1$ 2Ǜ
-
*(( )
++-*1
'*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/+0-.0
)//* .*'0/$*)
*ǚƾǀ-Ƽǁǚ

ǚ On ǸǸǸǸǸǸǸ ǸǸǛƾƼƾǀǛ/# $/4*0)
$'*!/# $/4*!0
'$)
*+/
-$)
)
*ǚǸǸ-ƾǀ
++-*1$)"/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǹ/# ǩDA
Approving OrdinanceǪǺǚ# ++-*1$)"-$)
)
/**& Ƣ
/*)ǸǸǸǸǸǸǸǸ,
ƾƼƾǀǚ
Ǜ Ǜ2$/#- ! - )
/*/# !*- "*$)"-
$/
'.
)$)

*).$ -
/$*)*!/# (0/0
'+-*($. .Ǜ*
'$"
/$*).
)
*1 )
)/.# - $)

*)/
$) Ǜ$/4
) 1 '*+ -
"-
.!*''*2.ǜ

AGREEMENT
ƽǚ Description o! Propertyǚ # -*+ -/4/#
/$./# .0
%
/*!/#$.
"- ( )/$. .
-$
$)3#$
$/ǚ
ƾǚ Interest o! Developerǚ 1 '*+ -#
.
' "
'$)/ - ./$)/# -*+ -/4
$)/#
/$/$./# *2) -*!/# -*+ -/4ǚ
ƿǚ Relations#ip o! City and Developerǚ
/$.0) -./**/#
//#$.
"- ( )/$.

*)/-

//#
/#
.
)) "*/$
/
)1*'0)/
-$'4 )/ - $)/*
4
/# $/4
) 1 '*+ -
)/#
/) $/# -$/4)*- 1 '*+ -$.
)
" )/*!/#
*/# -ǚ# $/4
) 1 '*+ -# -
4- )*0)
/# 3$./ )
*!
)4!*-(*!%*$)/
1 )/0- *-+
-/) -.#$+
/2 )/# (
)
"- /#
/)*/#$)"
*)/
$) # - $)
*-$)
)4*
0( )/ 3
0/ $)
*))
/$*)# - 2$/#.#
''

*)./-0
.
(
&$)"/# $/4
) 1 '*+ -%*$)/1 )/0- -.*-+
-/) -.ǚ
ǀǚ EƢective Date and Term
ǀǚƽ Ƣ
/$1
/ ǚ # Ƣ
/$1
/ *!/#$."- ( )/ǹ“EƢective
Date”Ǻ$. /#
/ 0+*)2#$
#/# ++-*1$)"-$)
)
/
& . Ƣ
/ǚ
ǀǚƾ -(ǚ# / -(*!/#$."- ( )/.#
''
*(( )
*)/#
Ƣ
/$1
/
).#
''
*)/$)0 !*-ƽƼǹ/ )Ǻ4
-.!*''*2$)"/# $/4*0)
$'Ǩ.
601
ǁ

+/
)
*!/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)+-*%
/
.
*)./-0
/ /*$/.
0'/$(
/ 2$/#
)' )"/#
. .
-$
$)/# $/4Ǩ.
-/$Ɵ
!*-/# 0
'$)
*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)Ǜ
.(*- +
-/$
0'
-'4 .
-$
$)Exhibit CǛ
//

#
# - /*
)$)
*-+*-
/ # - $)Ǜ0)' ...
$/ -($.*/# -2$. 3/ ) *-
/ -($)
/
.+-*1$ $)/#$."- ( )/ǹ
..* 3/ ) *-/ -($)
/ Ǜ/#
“TermǪǺǚ
)/# 1 )//#
/
)4/#$--+
-/4'

2.0$/$.Ɵ'
#
'' )"$)"/# $/4Ǩ.
$..0
)
*!/# -*%
/++-*1
'.*-$/.
*(+'$
)
2$/#Ǜ/# T -(*!/#$.
"- ( )/.#
''

0/*(
/$

''4 3/ ) !*-
0-
/$*) ,0
'/*/# /$( !-*(
/# Ɵ'$)"*!.0
#'

2.0$//*/# )/-4*!
Ɵ)
' *- -$.($..$)"*-*/# -2$.
Ɵ)
''4/ -($)
/$)".0
#'

2.0$/Ǜ2#$
#0-
/$*).#
''$)
'0
)4
++
'.
ǹǩLitigation Extension”)ǚ
!- ,0$-
4*) *!/# +
-/$ .Ǜ/# */# -+
-/4.#
''
)/ -$)/*
'
-$Ɵ

/$*)+0-.0
)//*
/$*)ƽǀǚǀ
'*2( (*-$
'$5$)"/#
' )"/#*!.0
#
$/$"
/$*)3/ ).$*)ǚ#$."- ( )/.#
''/ -($)
/ 2$/#
- .+
//*
)4!*-.
' - .$ )/$
''*/
).0
#'*/.#
''
- '
.
))*'*)" -
.0
%
//*/#$."- ( )/Ǜ2$/#*0//# 3
0/$*)*--
*-
/$*)*!
)4!0-/# -
*
0( )/Ǜ2# )

-/$Ɵ

/ *!*

0+
)
4#
.
)$..0 !*-/#
0$'$)"ǹ.Ǻ
*).0
#'*/ǚ
ǀǚƿ +/$*)
'3/ ).$*)ǚ -$*-/*/# 3+$-
/$*)*!/# -( *!/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/Ǜ
.+-*1$ $)
/$*)ǀǚƾǛ 1 '*+ -(
4 3/ )/#
T -(*!/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ**.*Ǜ 1 '*+ -.# ''"$1 $/42-$// )
)*/$

/'
./)$) /4ǹǅƼ)

4.+-$*-/*/# / -($)
/$*)
/ *!/# 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/ǚ //# /$( 1 '*+ -+-*1$ ..0
#)*/$
Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''(
&

+
4( )/ /*$/4$)/#
(*0)/*!ʜƾǁƼǛƼƼƼ ǹ
%0./ !*-$)Ơ
/$*)!-*(/#
Ƣ
/$1
/ 0.$)"/#
-Ǜ
)-
)
$.
*-
&'
)-
)
*. -
Ǻfor

#
4 -*! 3/ ).$*)- ,0 ./ 0) -/#$.+-*1$.$*)ǚ +*)- $+/*!/# )*/$

)
/#
*)/-$
0/$*)Ǜ/# $/4
)
" -.#
''
++-*1 /# 3/ ).$*)
).#
'')*/$!4
/# 1 '*+ -$)2-$/$)"/#
//# T -(*!/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/#
.
)

0/*(
/$

''4 3/ ) !*-
)
$/$*)
'/$( + -$* ,0
'/*/# /$( + -$*
- ,0 ./
4 1 '*+ -0) -/#$.+-*1$.$*)Ǜ
*(( )
$)"*)/#
/ /#
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/2*0'*/# -2$. #
1 / -($)
/ ǝ+-*1$ 1 '*+ -
(
4 3 -
$. $/.*+/$*)/* 3/ )/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/)*(*- /# )Ɵ1
ǹǁǺ/$( .Ǜ!*-
(
3$(0(/*/
'T -(*!/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/*!Ɵơ )
ǹƽǁǺ4
-. ǹ+'0.
)4 3/ ).$*).+0-.0
)//*
/$*).ǀǚƾ or ǀǚƿ # - *! Ǻǚ-*1$
/# - $.
) 3/ ).$*)+ -$*- (
$)$)"Ǜ 1 '*+ -(
4- ,0 .//# 3/ ).$*)!*-
(0'/$+' 4
-.
)+-*1$ /# +
4( )/0 !*-

#4
-Ǩ. 3/ ).$*)ǚ

#
3/ ).$*).#
''
++'4/*/# )/$- -*+ -/40+*)+
4( )/*!*) ʜƾǁƼǛƼƼƼ ǹ
.

%0./ $)

*-
)
2$/#/#$.
/$*)ǀǚƿǺ+ -4
- 3/ ).$*)+
4( )/Ǜ 1 )$!
/# -*+ -/4$.*2)
4(0'/$+' 1 '*+ -.
//#
//$( ǚ
602
ǂ
ǀǚǀ -(*!-*%
/++-*1
'.ǚ# / -(*!
)4-*%
/++-*1
'.
ǹ
. Ɵ) $)
$/
'Ǻ!*-/# -*+ -/4*-
)4+*-/$*)/# - *!Ǜ.+
$Ɵ

''4
$)
'0$)"2$/#*0/'$($/
/$*)/# ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)
Ǆǂǂǃ, .#
''
3/ )
0/*(
/$

''4!*-/# -(*!/#$."- ( )/ǚ
ǀǚǀǚƽ -($)
/$*)*!"- ( )/ǚ
)/# 1 )//#
/ /#$.
"- ( )/$./ -($)
/ +-$*-/*/# 3+$-
/$*)*!/# -(Ǜ/# / -(*!
)4
-*%
/++-*1
'
)/# 1 ./$)"+ -$*!*-
)4Ɵ)
'.0
$1$.$*)(
+
++-*1

.
-*%
/++-*1
'.#
''
/# / -(*/# -2$.
++'$

' /*/#
++-*1
'ǚ
ǁǚ Vested Rights/Use of the Property/Applicable Law/Processing ǁǚƽ $"#//* 1 '*+ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''#
1 /# 1 ./ -$"#//*
1 '*+/# -*%
/*)/# -*+ -/4$)

*-
)
2$/#/# / -(.
)
*)$/$*).
of ǹ$Ǻ/#$."- ( )/Ǜ/# -*%
/++-*1
'.ǹ
.
)2# )$..0 ǺǛ
)
)4

( )( )/./*
)4*!/# (
..#
''Ǜ!-*(/$( /*/$( Ǜ

++-*1 +0-.0
)//*
/#$."- ( )/Ǜ
)ǹ$$Ǻ/# $/4Ǩ.*-$)
)
.Ǜ
* .Ǜ- .*'0/$*).Ǜ-0' .Ǜ
- "0'
/$*).
)*ƣ
$
'+*'$
$ ."*1 -)$)"/# 1 '*+( )/Ǜ
*)./-0
/$*)Ǜ
.0
$1$.$*)Ǜ*

0+
)
4
)0. *!/# -*%
/
)/# -*+ -/4$)
'0$)"Ǜ
2$/#*0/'$($/
/$*)Ǜ/# ) -
''
)Ǜ/# 0
'$)0)$
$+
'* Ǜ
)/#
+
$Ɵ
'
)Ǜ/# + -($// 0. .*!/# -*+ -/4Ǜ ).$/4
)$)/ ).$/4*!0. *!
/# -*+ -/4
)/# (
3$(0(# $"#/Ǜ
0'&
).$5 *!+-*+*.
0$'$)".Ǜ
)
/# +-*1$.$*).!*-- . -1
/$*)*- $

/$*)*!'
)!*-+0
'$
+0-+*. . /#
/
-
$)!*-

) Ƣ
/*)/# Ƣ
/$1
/ *!/#$."- ( )/ǹ
*''
/$1 '4Ǜ
“Applicable Law”Ǻǚ
) 3 -
$.$)"$/.$.
- /$*)2# )

/$)"0+*).0
. ,0 )/
+-*%
/
++-*1
'.Ǜ$/4.#
''
++'4/# ++'$

2
./#
*)/-*''$)"
*4*!
'
2ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"/# !*- "*$)"*-
)4/#$)"/*/#
*)/-
-4# - $)Ǜ
)4

( )( )//*/# -*%
/++-*1
'..#
'')*/

*( +
-/*!/# '
2 1 '*+ -
$.1 ./ $)/*0) -/#$."- ( )/ 0)' ..
)
$/$*)
'
( )( )/*!/#$.
"- ( )/$. )/ - $)/*
/2 ) 1 '*+ -
)$/4$)

*-
)
2$/#/#$.
"- ( )/ǚ
)/# 1 )//#
/.0
#
( )( )/./*/# -*%
/++-*1
'.
-
.*0"#/!*-
)4$./$)
/+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4*--*%
/Ǜ.0
#
( )( )/.
.#
'')*/- ,0$-
( )( )/*!/#$."- ( )/2$/#- .+
//*
)4*/# -
+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4*--*%
/Ǜ 3
+//*/# 3/ )/. /!*-/#$).0
#

( )( )/ǚ
ǁǚƾ .Ǜ3

/$*).Ǜ $

/$*).ǚ# $/4.#
'')*/
++'4/*/#
-*%
/
)4 1 '*+( )/$(+

/! *-
)4
++'$

/$*)Ǜ+-*
..$)"Ǜ *-$).+
/$*)
! ǹ
*''
/$1 '4Ǜ“Fees”Ǻ/#
//# $/4Ɵ-./ )

/.
ơ -/# Ƣ
/$1
/ ǚ 3
+/

.*/# -2$. . /!*-/#$)/#$."- ( )/Ǜ$/4
) 1 '*+ -
"- /#
//#$.
"- ( )/* .)*/'$($//# $/4Ǩ.$.
- /$*)/*$(+*. *-- ,0$- ǹ
Ǻ+
4( )/
603
ǃ
*!
)4! .$)
*))
/$*)2$/#/# $..0
)
*!
)4.0
. ,0 )/p-*%
/
++-*1
'.

.)
..
-4!*-+0-+*. .*!($/$"
/$)" )1$-*)( )/
'
)*/# -$(+

/.*!/#
-*%
/Ǜǹ
Ǻ $

/$*)*!
)4'
)Ǜ*-ǹ
Ǻ
*)./-0
/$*)*!
)4+0
'$

$(+-*1 ( )/*-!

$'$/$ . ǹ
*''
/$1 '4“Exactions”Ǻǚ3
+/
..+
$Ɵ

''4
+-*1$ # - $)Ǜ)*/#$)"$)/#$."- ( )/.#
'''$($//# $/4Ǩ.

$'$/4/*
$(+*. 3$./$)" 1 '*+( )/$(+

/F .
/-
/ ./#
/
- $)
-
.
4*)/#

(*0)/.$) Ƣ
/*)/# Ƣ
/$1
/ *-'$($/ 1 '*+ -Ǩ.

$'$/4/*
#
'' )"

)4.0
#$)
-
. .0) -./
/ *-'*

''
2ǚ
ǁǚƿ *)./-0
/$*)* .ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"/# +-*1$.$*).*!

/$*)ǁǚƽ

*1 Ǜ/*/# 3/ )/++'$

2$)
'0 .- ,0$- ( )/.0) -/#
./
/ *-'*

''4
*+/
0$'$)"Ǜ+'0(
$)"Ǜ(
#
)$

'Ǜ '
/-$

'
)Ɵ-

* .ǹ
*''
/$1 '4/# “Codes”ǺǛ/# * .$)
'0 .#
''
/#*. $)!*-

)
Ƣ
/
//# /$( 1 '*+ -.0
($/.$/.
++'$

/$*)!*-/# - ' 1
)/
0$'$)"Ǜ
"-
$)"Ǜ*-*/# -
*)./-0
/$*)+ -($/./*$/4ǚ
)/# 1 )/*!

*)Ơ$
/
/2 )
.0
#* .
)/# -*%
/++-*1
'.Ǜ/# -*%
/++-*1
'..#
''Ǜ/*/#
(
3$(0( 3/ )/
''*2
4'
2Ǜ+- 1
$'ǚ*-
*)./-0
/$*)*!+0
'$

$)!-
./-0
/0- Ǜ/# * .
++'$

' /*.0
#
*)./-0
/$*).#
''
/#*. $)!*-

) Ƣ
/
//# /$( *! 3
0/$*)*!
)$(+-*1 ( )/
"- ( )/
/2 )$/4

) 1 '*+ -+0-.0
)//*#
+/ -ǅǚƽǂ*!/# 0
'$)0)$
$+
'* ǚ
ǁǚǀ 20' .
) "0'
/$*).ǚ0-$)"/# -(*!/#$.
"- ( )/Ǜ/# $/4(
4
++'4) 2*-(*$Ɵ *-$)
)
.Ǜ- .*'0/$*).Ǜ-0' .Ǜ
- "0'
/$*).,
)*ƣ
$
'+*'$
$ .*!/# $/4/*/# -*+ -/42#$
#2 - )*/$)
!*-

) Ƣ
/*)/# Ƣ
/$1
/ *)'4/*/# 3/ )//# 4
- )*/$)
*)Ơ$
/
2$/#/# 1 ./ -$"#/."-
)/
4/# ++'$

2Ǜ/# -*%
/++-*1
'., or
/#$."- ( )/ǚ
)
$/$*)/*
)4*/# -
*)Ơ$
/./#
/(
4*

0-Ǜ

#*!/#
!*''*2$)") 2*-(*$Ɵ *-$)
)
.Ǜ- .*'0/$*).Ǜ-0' .Ǜ- "0'
/$*)., *-*ƣ
$
'
+*'$
$ ..#
''

*).$ -
+ -.
*)Ơ$
/2$/#/# ++'$

2ǜ
ǁǚǀǚƽ )4
++'$

/$*)*-- ,0$- ( )/*!.0
#) 2*-
(*$Ɵ *-$)
)
.Ǜ- .*'0/$*).Ǜ-0' .Ǜ- "0'
/$*).*-*ƣ
$
'+*'$
$ ./#
/
2*0'ǹ$Ǻ

0. *-$(+*.
.0
./
)/$
'Ɵ)
)
$
'
0- )*)Ǜ*-(
/ -$
''4 '
4
1 '*+( )/*!/# -*+ -/4
.*/# -2$.
*)/ (+'
/
4/#$."- ( )/*-
/# -*%
/++-*1
'.Ǜǹ$$Ǻ!-0./-
/ $)
(*- /#
)$).$")$Ɵ

)/2
4/# $)/ )/*-
+0-+*. *!/# -*%
/++-*1
'.*-+-
'0
*(+'$
)
/# - 2$/#$)
'0$)"Ǜ
2$/#*0/'$($/
/$*)Ǜ
4+- 1 )/$)"*-$(+*.$)"'$($/.*-
*)/-*'.$)/# -
/ Ǜ
/$($)"Ǜ+#
.$)"*-. ,0 )
$)"*! 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*%
/ǝǹ$$$Ǻ+- 1 )/*-
'$($//# +-*
..$)"*-+-*
0-$)"*!.0
. ,0 )/p-*%
/
++-*1
'.ǝ*-ǹ$1Ǻ- 0

/# ).$/4*-$)/ ).$/4*!0. *!/# -*+ -/4
.
2#*' Ǜ*-*/# -2$. - ,0$-$)"

)4- 0
/$*)$)/# .,0
- !**/
" *!Ǜ*-/*/
')0(
-*!Ǜ+-*+*.
0$'$)".Ǜ
604
Ǆ
./-0
/0- .
)*/# -$(+-*1 ( )/.Ǜ$)
(
)) -/#
/$.$)
*).$./ )/2$/#*-
(*- - ./-$
/$1 /#
)/# '$($/
/$*).$)
'0 $)/#$."- ( )/
)/# -*%
/
++-*1
'.ǝ
)ȍ*-
ǁǚǀǚƾ
!
)4*!.0
#*-$)
)
.Ǜ- .*'0/$*).Ǜ-0' .Ǜ
- "0'
/$*).Ǜ *-*ƣ
$
'+*'$
$ .*)*/#
1 " ) -
'ǹ$/4-2$ Ǻ
++'$

$'$/4ǚ
ǁǚǁ *-
/*-$0(*/++'$

' ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"
)4/#$)"/*/#

*)/-
-4
*)/
$) # - $)Ǜ$!
$/4*-$)
)
Ǜ- .*'0/$*)Ǜ+*'$
4Ǜ$-
/$1 Ǜ*-
*/# -(
.0- $. )

/ *-

*( . Ƣ
/$1 Ǜ2# /# -
4

/$*)*!/# $/4*-

4$)$/$
/$1 Ǜ
)$!$/$(+*. .

0$'$)"(*-
/*-$0(2#$
#
Ƣ
/.
''*-
)4
+
-/*!/# -*%
/Ǜ$/4
"- ./#
/.0
#*-$)
)
Ǜ- .*'0/$*)*-*/# -(
.0-
.#
'')*/
++'4/*/# -*%
/Ǜ/# -*+ -/4Ǜ/#$."- ( )/*-/# -*%
/
++-*1
'.0)' ../#
0$'$)"(*-
/*-$0($.$(+*.
.+
-/*!

'
-
/$*)*!

' ( -" )
4*-./
/ *! ( -" )
4
. Ɵ) $)*1 -)( )/*
/$*)
ǄǁǁǄǛ+-*1$ /#
//*/# 3/ )/
(*-
/*-$0(
++'$ ./*
''*-
)4+
-/*!/#
-*%
//# )/# -(.#
''
0/*(
/$

''4
3/ ) !*-
+ -$**!/$( ,0
'
/*/# + -$**!/# (*-
/*-$0(ǚ
ǁǚǂ 1$. ++'$

/$*) .ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"
/$*) ǁǚƾǛ
)4
3$./$)"
++'$

/$*)Ǜ+-*
..$)"
)$).+
/$*)! ./#
/
- - 1$. 0-$)"/#
T -(*!/#$."- ( )/.#
''
++'4/*/# -*%
/+-*1$ /#
/ǹƽǺ.0
#! .
#
1 " ) -
'
++'$

$'$/4
)
-
*).$./ )/2$/#/
/ '
2'$($/
/$*)./#
/
+-*
..$)"! .)*/ 3
/# ./$(
/ -
.*)

'
*./*!+-*1$$)"/#
. -1$
!*-2#$
#/# 4
-
#
-" ǝǹƾǺ/#
++'$

/$*)*!.0
#! ./*/#
-*+ -/4$.+-*.+
/$1 ǝ
)ǹƿǺ/#
++'$

/$*)*!.0
#! .2*0')*/+- 1 )/Ǜ
$(+*.
.0
./
)/$
'Ɵ)
)
$
'
0- )*)Ǜ*-(
/ -$
''4 '
4 1 '*+( )/$)

*-
)
2$/#/#$."- ( )/ǚ4.*
"- $)"Ǜ 1 '*+ -* .)*/2
$1 $/.
-$"#/./*
#
'' )" /# ' "
'$/4*!
)4.0
#
++'$

/$*)Ǜ+-*
..$)",
)ȍ*-
$).+
/$*)! .ǚ
ǁǚǃ 2
3 .ǚ#$."- ( )/.#
'')*/+-*#$
$//#
++'$

/$*)
*!
)4.0
. ,0 )/'4 )

/ City-2$ /
3 ./*/# -*%
/+-*1$ /#
/ǹƽǺ/#

++'$

/$*)*!.0
#/
3 ./*/# -*+ -/4$.+-*.+
/$1 Ǜ
)ǹƾǺ/#
++'$

/$*)*!
.0
#/
3 .2*0')*/+- 1 )/ 1 '*+( )/$)

*-
)
2$/#/#$."- ( )/ǚ
4.*
"- $)"Ǜ 1 '*+ -* .)*/2
$1 $/.-$"#/./*
#
'' )" /# ' "
'$/4*!

)4.0
#/
3 .Ǜ!

$
''4*-
.
++'$ /*$/.-*%
/*--*+ -/4Ǜ*-/*
'
$(
3 (+/$*)!-*(
)4/
3 ./*/# 3/ )/
''*2
4'
2ǚ
ǁǚǄ 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*%
/ǝ#
.$)"Ǜ$($)"ǚ $)
/#

'$!*-)$
0+- ( *0-/# '$)Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo 605
ǅ
ǹƽǅǄǀǺƿǃ
'ǚƿǀǂǁǛ/#
//# !
$'0- *!/# +
-/$ ./# - $)/*+-*1$ !*-/#
/$($)"*! 1 '*+( )/- .0'/ $)
'
/ -
*+/ $)$/$
/$1 - ./-$
/$)"/# /$($)"
*! 1 '*+( )//*+- 1
$'*1 -.0
#+
-/$ .Ǩ
"- ( )/Ǜ$/$./#
-/$ .Ǩ$)/ )//*

0- /#
/ Ɵ
$ )
4
4

&)*2' "$)"
)+-*1$$)"/#
//#$."- ( )/

*)/
$).)*- ,0$- ( )/./#
/ 1 '*+ -(0./$)$/$
/ *-
*(+' /
)4

/$*)Ǜ
$)
'0$)"2$/#*0/'$($/
/$*)Ǜ 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*%
/2$/#$)
)4+ -$**!
/$( . /
4$/4ǚ */#$)"$)/#$."- ( )/$.$)/ ) /*
-
/ )*-.#
''$/

*)./-0 /*
-
/
)4
ƣ-(
/$1 1 '*+( )/*
'$"
/$*)./* 1 '*+/#
-*%
/Ǜ*-'$

$'$/4$) 1 '*+ -0) -/#$."- ( )/$!/# 1 '*+( )/! $'.
/**

0-ǚ
/$./# $)/ )/$*)*!/#$.+-*1$.$*)/#
/ 1 '*+ -

' /* 1 '*+
/# -*+ -/4$)

*-
)
2$/#$/.*2)/$( .
# 0' .
)/# -*%
/
++-*1
'.ǚ
ǁǚǅ -*
..$)"ǚ */#$)"$)/#$."- ( )/.#
''

*)./-0 /*
'$($//#
0/#*-$/4*-*
'$"
/$*)*!$/4/*#*')
..
-4+0
'$
#
-$)".Ǜ)*-/*
'$($//# $.
- /$*)*!$/4*-
)4*!$/.*ƣ
-.*-*ƣ
$
'.2$/#- "
-/*
.0
. ,0 )/+-*%
/
++-*1
'./#
/- ,0$- /# 3 -
$. *!$.
- /$*)
4$/4Ǜ
+-*1$ /#
/.0
#$.
- /$*).#
''
3 -
$.
*).$./ )/2$/#/# 1 ./ -$"#/.
"-
)/
4/#$."- ( )/Ǜ/# ++'$

2,
)/# -*%
/++-*1
'.ǚ
ǂǚ Property Gradingǚ
ǂǚƽ #
.$)"ǚ For (0/0
'
) Ɵ/Ǜ/#
-/$ . .$- (
.."-
$)"
*!/# -*+ -/4+-$*-/*/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)/#-*0"#/# -*+ -/4ǚ
0-.0
)//*0
'$)0)$
$+
'*
/$*)ǃǚƽǂǚƽǃƼǹǺǛ2# )/# $)/ ) 0.
*!
.$/ - ,0$- .
++-*1
'*!
$.
- /$*)
-45*)$)"+ -($/Ǜ
"-
$)"+ -($/
.#
'' not be $..0 until .
$
++-*1
'ǚ #
-/$ .
"- /#
//# $)/ ) 0. Ǜ
3 '0.$1 '4!*-+0-+*. .*!0
'$)0)$
$+
'*
/$*)ǃǚƽǂǚƽǃƼǹǺ
)/#$.

/$*)Ǜ.#
''(
) /# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)ǚ
)

*-
)
2$/#/#$.

/$*)Ǜ 1 '*+ -(
4
++'4for,
)$/4(
4$..0
"-
$)"+ -($/Ǜ
)*/2$/#./
)$)"
++-*1
'*!
$.
- /$*)
-45*)$)"+ -($/!*-/# $)/ ) 0.
*!/# - (
$) -*!/# -*%
/.$/ ǚ
ǂǚƾ '*+
. ( )/ǚ # -*%
/++-*1
'.- ,0$- 1 '*+ -/*
$

/
'*+
. ( )/ǹǩSE”) !*-/#
/+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4
%

)//*/#
!0/0- 0
'$)*0' 1
-!-*)/
" , $!(
.."-
$)"#
.)*/
*(( )
+ -/#
+- '$($)
-4"-
$)"+'
)
..#*2)*)/# ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ Ǆǂǂƿǚ
1 '*+ - .#
''
**+ -
/ $)"**!
$/# 2$/#/# $/4)"$) -*)/# 3/ )/*!
/# $

/$*))
..
-4/*

*((*
te /# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)ǚ
T# SE .#
''
$

/
4. +
-
/ $)./-0( )/Ǜ$)
!*-(.
/$.!

/*-4/*/#
$/4)"$) -
)$/4//*-) 4Ǜ prior to /# Ɵ-./Ɵ)
'*-+
-
'(
+Ɵ'
4
606
ƽƼ
1 '*+ -2$/#$)/# /#- -4
- ǹƿǺ + -$* - ! - )
$)
/$*)Ǆǚ
!
Ɵ)
'*-
+
-
'(
+$.)*/Ɵ'
4 1 '*+ -2$/#$)/# /#- -4
-ǹƿǺ+ -$*Ǜ/# .#
''

/ $)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/#/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*) -$"#/-of-2
4
$

/$*) .
-$
$)
/$*)Ǆǚ
ǃǚ AƢordable ousingǚ
ǃǚƽ )$/. ,0$-
4 "0'
/$*).ǚ 1 '*+ -+-*+*. .0+/*ƾƿǄ
- .$ )/$
'0)$/.*)/# -*+ -/4ǚ0-.0
)//*/# $/4Ǩ.
)
'0.$*)
-4*)$)"
"0'
/$*).ǹ#
+/ -ǄǚǂǄ*!/# 0
'$)0)$
$+
'* Ǻǹ/# “Regulations”),
1 '*+ -.*!(*- /#
)/2 )/4ǹƾƼ) - .$ )/$
'0)$/.
- - ,0$- /*. /
.$
ƽƾǚǁʷ*!/# /*/
')0(
-*!0)$/.$)/# +-*%
/
.
Ƣ*-

' 0)$/.
..+
$Ɵ ǚ
ǃǚƾ '/ -)
/$1 *(+'$
)
0/#*-$5 ǚ ) -/# "0'
/$*).Ǜ

-/
$) 3
+/$*).+ -($/ 1 '*+ -./*.
/$.!4/# *
'$"
/$*)*/# -/#
)/#-*0"#
on-.$/
*)./-0
/$*)ǚ*-$)./
)
Ǜ+
-/*!/#$.*
'$"
/$*)

)
.
/$.Ɵ
/#-*0"#/# +
4( )/*!
! $)-'$ 0*!
*)./-0
/$*)*!0)$/.ǚ
)
$/ion,
1 '*+ -.

).
/$.!4/# $-
Ƣ*-

' #*0.$)"*
'$"
/$*).
4Ǜ
(*)"*/# -
(
#
)$.(.Ǜ*
/
$)$)"$/4*0)
$'
++-*1
'*!
)
'/ -)
/$1 ( /#**!

*(+'$
)
/#
//# $/4*0)
$'Ɵ).( //# +0-+*. .*!/# "0'
/$*).ǚ
ǃǚƿ
/$.!

/$*)*!$/4 ,0$- ( )/.ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''.
/$.!4$/.

Ƣ*-

' #*0.$)"*
'$"
/$*) /#-*0"#
*(+'$
)
2$/#/# "0'
/$*).ǚ
Ǆǚ Right-of-ay Dedicationsǚ # -*%
/++-*1
'.- ,0$-
1 '*+ -/* $

/
+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4 /*/# $/4 in fee
.-$"#/-of-2
4
for /# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)Ǜ$)" ) -
'
*)!*-(
)
2$/#/#
*+/
-
$. '
)Ǜ/# (*./
0-- )/ .$")+'
).*)Ɵ' 2$/#/# *ƣ
*!/# $/4
Engineer
//# /$( *! $

/$*)Ǜ
)/# ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ Ǆǂǂƿǚ
S0
# $

/$*).#
''*

0-)*'
/ -/#
)/#- ǹƿǺ4
-.!-*(/#
++-*1
'
/
*!/# ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃǚ # $

/ -$"#/-of2
4.#
''
.#*2)*)/# Ɵ-./ Ɵ)
' *-+
-
' (
+Ɵ' 2$/#$)/#- -4
-.ǹƿǺof
/#
++-*1
'
/ *! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃǚ I!
Ɵ)
'
*-+
-
' (
+$.)*/Ɵ' 2$/#$)/# /#- -4
- ǹƿǺ + -$*Ǜ/# -$"#/-of-2
4.#
''
be $

/
4
. +
-
/ $)./-0( )/Ǜ$)
!*-(.
/$.!

/*-4/*/# $/4
)"$) -
)$/4//*-) 4ǚ 1 '*+ -
"- ./#
/$/2$'')*/-
$1
)4
607
ƽƽ

*(+ ).
/$*)*--
$1
)4
./ -)-
).+*-/
/$*)
(+

/ Fee ǹ“EDTIF”)

- $/.!*- $

/$)"/# -$"#/-of-2
4 !*-/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)ǚ
ǅǚ Community Facilities District – Service and Maintenance of Public Streets and Improvementsǚ
ǅǚƽ *((0)$/4

$'$/$ .$./-$
/ǚ 1 '*+ -
"- . /*
**+ -
/
$)/# !*-(
/$*)*!Ǜ*-
)) 3
/$*)$)/*Ǜ

*((0)$/4!

$'$/$ .$./-$
/*-
$./-$
/. ./

'$.# +0-.0
)//*/# ''*-**.
/, $)
'0$)"
++-*1
'*!
!*-/# +0-+*. *!Ɵ)
)
$)"/# . -1$
.
)(
$)/ )
)
*!
''+0
'$
./- /.
ǹ$)
'0$)"./*-(-
$).4./ (.Ǜ./- /'$"#/.Ǜ
)*/# -./- /
++0-/ )
)
.Ǻ

*)./-0
/
4/# 1 '*+ -2$/#$)/# !0/0- - .$ )/$
'/-

/+
-
'.
ơ -
$/4Ǩ.

+/
)
*!$(+-*1 ( )/.ǚ 1 '*+ -
"- ./#
//#
*0)
-$ .*!/#
$./-$
/ǹ.Ǻ2$''$)
'0
''*!/# -*+ -/4Ǜ
)/#
/ 1 '*+ -2$'')*/
*)/ ./
)
2$''Ǜ!*-
)*)
#
'!*!
''*!/# -*+ -/4Ǜ1*/ $)!
1*-*!!*-(
/$*)*!*-

)) 3
/$*)$)/*/# $./-$
/ǹ.Ǻ+-$*-/*Ɵ'$)"/# Ɵ-./Ɵ)
'(
+ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''
+
4$/.!
$-.#
- *!
($)$./-
/$1
*./.$)
0--
4/# $/4
..*
$
/ 2$/#/#
!*-(
/$*)*!
)ȍ*-
)) 3
/$*)$)/*/# $./-$
/ǹ.ǺǛ
. / -($)
4/# $/4
EngineerǛ+-$*-/*Ɵ'$)"/# Ɵ-./Ɵ)
'(
+ǚ
ǅǚƾ '/ -)
/$1 /#**!*(+'$
)
ǚ */2$/#./
)$)"/#
foregoing, $/4
"- ./#
/ 1 '*+ -(
4
'/ -)
/$1 '4 ./

'$.#
(
$)/ )
)

!0)Ǜ$)
)
(*0)//*
/ -($)
4/# $/4)"$) -Ǜ /#
/
*(+ ).
/ .!*-

'' !0/0- (
$)/ )
)
*!
''+0
'$
./- /.ǹ$)
'0$)"./*-(-
$).4./ (.Ǜ./- /
'$"#/.Ǜ
)*/# -./- /
++0-/ )
)
.) 2$/#$)
-
'.ǃ
)Ǆ ǹ!0/0- - .$ )/$
'
/-

/Ǻ,
..#*2)*)/# ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃ,
ơ -
CityǨ.

+/
)
*!$(+-*1 ( )/.ǚ
! 1 '*+ -
*(+'$ .2$/#/#$.
/$*)ǅǚƾ
+-$*-/*Ɵ'$)"/# Ɵ-./Ɵ)
'(
+Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''
3 (+/!-*(
*(+'$
)

2$/#
/$*)ǅǚƽǚ
ƽƼǚ Eastern Dublin Transportation Impact Fee Creditsǚ 1 '*+ - .#
'')*/0. *-
++'4
)4

- $/./#
/$/+0-
#
. *-/-
).! -- !-*(

)4*/# -
- $/-#*' -/*.
/$.!4 1 '*+ -Ǩ.*
'$"
/$*).. /!*-/## - $)ǚ City

"- ./#
/

- $/.!*-
'' '$"$
' ǩ0
'$

(+-*1 ( )/.Ǫ
. Ɵ) $)

/$*)ƽƿ.#
''
+-*1$ !*-0.
4 1 '*+ -0+*)
*(+' /$*)*!

*)./-0
/$*)*-0+*)
*)$)"!*-.
$ǩ0
'$

(+-*1 ( )/.ǚ” 1 '*+ -.#
''

'.*#
1 /# -$"#//*/-
).! -*-. ''
)4 '$"$
'

- $/./#
/$/-
$1 .
!-*(/# $/4/*!0/0-
*(( -
$
'ǹȍǺ*-- .$ )/$
' 1 '*+ -.*!/#
608
ƽƾ
1 -$*0.+
-
'.*!-

/Ǆǂǂƿ$)

*-
)
2$/#/# - ,0$- ( )/.*!/#
Consolidated Impact Fee Administrative GuidelinesǛ
-0
-4ƾƼƾǀǚ
ƽƽǚ Cooperation with Mitigationǚ
ƽƽǚƽ # $/4$.$)/# ($./*!+0-.0$)"- "0'
/*-4-
" )
4+ -($/.
for /# 0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)+-*%
/ǹǩ+-*%
/ǪǺ/#
/
-*.. ./#-*0"#
/# -*+ -/4ǚ# -*+ -/4$..0
#/#
//# $/4$.- ,0$- /*($/$"
/ !*-/#
+ -(
) )/$)$-
/$(+

/.*).+
$
'./
/0..+
$ .in /#
-
.*!/# -*+ -/4
.*0/#*!0
'$)*0' 1
-ǚ 1 '*+ -Ǩ.-*%
/2$''- ,0$- 1 '*+ -/*($/$"
/
!*-$-
/$(+

/.*).+
$
'./
/0..+
$ .$)/#
-
.*!/# -*+ -/4.*0/#*!
0
'$)*0' 1
-ǚ# $/4#
.
'-
4
*(($// /*Ɵ)
)
$)"/# ($/$"
/$*)*!
/# +-*%
/Ǜ
) 1 '*+ -2$''$-
/'4
) Ɵ/!-*(.0
# 3+ )$/0- ǚ

)2#$' Ǜ 1 '*+ -$.+- +
- /*.0
($/+ -($/.*!$/.*2)/*/# - .*0-

" )
$ .Ǜ
)/#*. + -($/.0
($//
'.2$''- ,0$-
($/$"
/$*)+'
)/#
/
$)
'0 .($/$"
/$*)!*-/# + -(
) )/$)$-
/$(+

/..*0/#*!0
'$)
*0' 1
-Ǜ
)/# $/4$.)*/4 /+- +
- /*.0
($/$/.+ -($/.ǚ# $/4#
.

0. $/.
*).0'/
)/Ǜ .*0-
)1$-*)( )/
'*'0/$*).Ǜ
)
ǚǛ/*begin
1 '*ping
+'
)/*(
& $/.($/$"
/$*).*'0/$*)
1 $'

' !*- 1 '*+ -Ǩ.0. in
($/$"
/$)"/# -*%
/Ǩ.$-
/$(+

/.ǚ#
-/$ .
"- /*
**+ -
/ $)

*(( -
$
''4-
.*)

' (
)) -/* Ƣ
/0
/ /# "*
'*!(
&$)"/# $/4Ǩ.
($/$"
/$*).*'0/$*)
1 $'

' /* 1 '*+ -ǚ

*-$)"'4Ǜ

#+
-/4
"- ./*
'$1 -2#
/ 1 -
*). )/.(
4
)
..
-4/*

*(+'$.#.0
#*
%
/$1 ǚ
ƽƾǚ Nature Community Parklandǚ
ƽƾǚƽ 0-
#
.
)
' ǚ 0
%
//*to-be-) "*/$
/ / -(.Ǜ/#
1 '*+ -2$''. '',
)$/42$''+0-
#
. Ǜ0.$)"- 1 )0 . -$1 !-*(/#
0
'$

$'$/$ . ǹǩǪǺ, /#
++-*3$(
/ '4ǀƾǚǂƾ

- .*!'
)*)/#
-*+ -/4/#
/$.+- . )/'4 .$")
/
.ǩ+ )+

Ǫ0) -/# $/4Ǩ. ) -
'
'
)
)/#
./ -)0
'$)+
$Ɵ
'
)ǹ/# ǩ
/0-
-&

)ǪǺ!*-
/*/
'
+0-
#
. +-$
*!ʜƾǃǛǄǀǃǛǅƼǄǹǩ0-
#
. -$
ǪǺǚ# +0-
#
. +-$
$.

. *)
/# '
) 1
'0 *!ʜǂǁƿǛǀƼƼ+ -

- 0. $)/# $/4Ǩ. p-*"-
(ǚ
!/#e Ɵ)
'

-
" '$1 - /*/# $/4$.(*- *-' ../#
)ǀƾǚǂƾ

- .Ǜ
0/)*/(*- /#
)
ǀǅǚƽƼ

- .Ǜ/# 0-
#
. -$
.#
''

%0./

*-$)"'4ǚ #
-/$ .
"-
/*) "*/$
/ $)"**!
$/#/*2
-
(0/0
''4
"-

' +0-
#
.
).
'

"- ( )/ ǹ/# ǩǪǺ 2$/#$).$3(*)/#.*!/# Ƣ
/$1
/ ǚ
ƽƾǚƽǚƽ
)$/$
'
4( )/ǚ#
-/$ .
"- /#
//# $/4Ǩ.$)$/$
'
+
4( )/0) -/# 2$''/
& /# !*-(*!
ʜǃǛƾǂǅǛƽǂǀ +
4( )/ ǹ*-.0
#

(*0)/
.(
4

%0./
'*2Ǻǹ/# ǩ
)$/$
'
4( )/ǪǺ/*/# 1 '*+ -to
609
ƽƿ
+0-
#
. /#
/0-
-&'
)!-*(/# /#
/2$''
.$(0'/
) *0.'4+
$
4
/# 1 '*+ -/*/# $/4 !*-/# $/$"
/$*)*./ǚ#
)$/$
'
4( )/

'
0'
/$*)
of ʜǃǛƾǂǅǛƽǂǀ$./# $/4Ǩ.+- . )/ ./$(
/ *!/# $/4Ǩ.
*./ of ($/$"
/$)"!*-/#
+ -(
) )/$)$-
/$(+

/.*).+
$
'./
/0..+
$ .*!/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-
3/ ).$*)+-*%
/*)/# -*+ -/4$)
-
..*0/#*!0
'$)*0' 1
- ǹ/#
ǩ$/$"
/$*)*./ǪǺǚ#*0'/# $/$"
/$*)*./ 3
ʜǃǛƾǂǅǛƽǂǀǛ/#
)$/$
'

4( )/.#
''
$)
-
. /*
,0
'/*/# $)
-
.
(*0)/ǚ 1 '*+ -#
.
+- 1$*0.'4
*(($// /*- $(
0-.$)"/# $/4!*-/# $/$"
/$*)*./

0.
/# $/$"
/$*)*Ƣ. /. /# 1 '*+ -Ǩ.*
'$"
/$*)/*($/$"
/ !*-/# $-
/$(+

/.
*).+
$
'.+
$ .*!/# 1 '*+( )/*)/# .
( '
).ǚ #*0') "*/$
/$*).on
/# )*/
+-*
$)"/*/# $/4Ǩ..
/$.!

/$*)Ǜ/# $/4(
4 '
/
/
)4
/$( /*- ,0$- 1 '*+ -/*- $(
0-. $/!*-/# $/$"
/$*)*./ǚ
ƽƾǚƽǚƾ (
$)$)"
'
)
ǚ$/#- "
-/*/# - (
$)$)"

'
)
*!/# 0-
#
. -$

ơ -/# I)$/$
'
4( )/, /#
-/$ .

&)*2' "
/#
//# 0
'$

$'$/$ . !0).+- . )/'4
1 $'

'
- $).0ƣ
$ )//*
''*2
/# $/4/*+
4/# !0''
(*0)/*!/# 0-
#
. -$
$)/# .#*-// -(ǚ# City

&)*2' " ./#
/$/.*
'$"
/$*)/*) "*/$
/ $)"**!
$/#/*2
-/#
$)
'0 .) "*/$
/$)"
(0/0
''4
"-

' +
4( )/.
# 0' !*-+
4( )/*!/#

'
)
*!/# 0-
#
. -$
ǹ/# ǩ
4( )/
# 0' ǪǺ/#
/2*0'
- Ơ
/
$)/# ǚ
!/#
-/$ .
- 0)

' /*
"- *)/#
4( )/
# 0' $)/#
Ǜ 1 '*+ -(
4 '
//*#
1 /#

'
)
/-
/
.

- $/0) -/# / -(.
*!/# +-*"-
(ǚ
ƽƾǚƾ /'
).ǚ #
-/$ .

&)*2' " /#
//# -
- /#
%0-$.$
/$*)
'2 /'
).*)/#
/0-
-&

)
)/#
/ 1 '*+ -Ǩ. .*0-

" )
4 -($/. (
4.0
%
/.0
#'
)./*
- ./-$
/$*)*-
*). -1
/$*)

. ( )/!*-2 /'
)+- . -1
/$*)ǚ #
-/$ .
"- /#
//# *2) -.#$+*!.0
#
'
).Ǜ
)/# $(+

/*!/# - ./-$
/$*)*-
*). -1
/$*)
. ( )/Ǜ.#*0'
/# $/4/
& *2) -.#$+*!.0
#'
).Ǜ *)/# 0-
#
. -$

- 0)- .*'1
)
2$''#
1 /*
- .*'1 $)/#
*0-. *!) "*/$
/$)"/# ǚ
!/# $/42 - /*
/
& *2) -.#$+*!/# %0-$.$
/$*)
'2 /'
).Ǜ/# 1 '*+ -.#
''+-*1$

(
$)/ )
)
!0)*- ./

'$.#
(
$)/ )
)
(
#
)$.(!*-(
$)/ )
)
*!
/# 2 /'
).2$/#$)/#
/0-
-&

)
.- ,0$-
4/# .*0-
" )
$ .ǚ
ƽƿǚ Public Improvementsǚ # +
-/$ .
"- /#
//# -*%
/Ǩ.
0$'*0/
2$''- ,0$- /#
*(+' /$*)*!
-/
$)$(+-*1 ( )/.
) /#
//# $/4Ǩ.
++-*1
'
of ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+.ǄǂǂƿǛǄǂǂǂǛ
)Ǆǂǂǃ.#
'')*/+- 1 )//# $/4
610
ƽǀ
!-*('
/ -- ,0$-$)"/#
*(+' /$*)*ơ# !*''*2$)"$)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/#'
/ -
+#
. .*!/# +-*%
/ǜ
ƽƿǚƽ Dublin B*0' 1
-ǚ
)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/# 1 '*+( )/of $/# -

-
'ƽ *-
-
'ƾ *! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ǄǂǂƿǛ 1 '*+ -.#
''

**-$)
/ 2$/#/# $/4*!0
'$)
)'
(
*0)/4-
).+*-/
/$*)
*(($..$*)ǹǺ*)/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-– *-/#
)4*).
-&2
4
3/ ).$*)-*%
/ǚ 1 '*+ - .#
''
*)./-0
/0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)-*%
/
$(+-*1 ( )/.
/2 )
''*)*

)-*
&*
Ǜ
*).$./ )/2$/#/# '
/ ./
0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)-*%
/
(+-*1 ( )/'
).ǚ # 1 '*+ -.#
''

'$"$
' !*-
./ -)0
'$)-
ƣ

(+

/ ǹ
Ǻ
- $/.!*-/#
*./*!/#
'$"$
' $(+-*1 ( )/.
*)./-0
/ *-
*) !*- 3
'0$)"/# '
)
*./*!/#
-$"#/-of-2
4Ǜ)*//* 3
/#
*./.#*2)$)/#
ǚ
ƽƿǚƾ 0
'$)*0' 1
-ǚ
)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/# 1 '*+( )/*! $/# -

-
'ƿ*-
-
'ǅ*! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ǄǂǂƿǛ 1 '*+ -.#
''

**-$)
/ 2$/#/# $/4*!0
'$)
)'
(
*0)/4-
).+*-/
/$*)
*(($..$*)ǹǺ*)/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-– *-/#
)4*).
-&2
4
3/ ).$*)-*%
/ǚ 1 '*+ - .#
''
*)./-0
/0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)-*%
/
$(+-*1 ( )/.
/2 )
''*)*

)
./ -'4+-*%
// -($)0. *-
)4+*-/$*)
)*/4 /
*)./-0
/ 2$/#$)/# +-*%
/
*0)
-4Ǜ
*).$./ )/2$/#/# '
/ ./
0
'$)*0' 1
-3/ ).$*)-*%
/
(+-*1 ( )/'
).ǚ # 1 '*+ -.#
''

'$"$
' !*-
./ -)0
'$)-
ƣ

(+

/ ǹ
Ǻ
- $/.!*-/#
*./*!/#
'$"$
' $(+-*1 ( )/.
*)./-0
/ *-
*) !*- 3
'0$)"/# '
)
*./*!/#
-$"#/-of-2
4Ǜ)*//* 3
/#
*./.#*2)$)/#
ǚ
ƽƿǚƿ 0
'$)*0' 1
-ȍ
''*)*

)/ -.
/$*)ǚ
)
*)%0)
/$*)
2$/# 1 '*+( )/*! $/# -
-
'ƽǛ
-
'ƾǛ
-
'ƿ*-
-
'ǅ*! ./$)"
)/
/$1 -

/
+ǄǂǂƿǛ 1 '*+ -.#
''
*(+' / /# 0
'$)*0' 1
-ȍ

''*)*
$)/ -.
/$*)$(+-*1 ( )/./*

*((*
/ /# !*''*2$)"
$)/ -.
/$*)'
) " *( /-4ǚ# ($)$(0(2$/#*!/#-*0"#'
) .
)/0-)'
) .

)//*/# ( $
)
)/#
0-
.#
''
ƽƾǨǚ
x *-/#
*0)ǜ/#- ' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜ!*0-/#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ/2*-$"#/-/0-)'
) .
x *0/#
*0)ǜ/2*' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜfour /#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ*) -$"#/-/0-)'
)
x
./
*0)ǜ/2*' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜ/#- /#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ/2*-$"#/-/0-)'
) .
x ./
*0)ǜ/#- ' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜ/#- /#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ*) -$"#/-/0-)'
)
# 1 '*+ -.#
''
'$"$
' !*-
./ -)0
'$)-
ƣ

(+

/ ǹ
Ǻ

- $/.!*-/#
*./*!/# '$"$
' $(+-*1 ( )/.
*)./-0
/ *-
*) !*-
611
ƽǁ
3 '0$)"/# '
)
*./*!/# -$"#/-of-2
4Ǜ)*//* 3
/#
*./.#*2)$)/#

ǚ
ƽƿǚǀ
''*)*
ȍ
''*)
/ 2
4 –
-
'ƽ

..
)/ -.
/$*)ǚ In

*)%0)
/$*)2$/# 1 '*+( )/*! $/# -
-
'ƽǛ
-
'ƾǛ
-
'ƿ*-
-
'ǅ*!
./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ǄǂǂƿǛ 1 '*+ -.#
''
*(+' / /#
''*)*
ȍ

''*)
/ 2
4$)/ -.
/$*)/*

*((*
/ /# !*''*2$)"$)/ -.
/$*)'
)
" *( /-4ǚ# ($)$(0(2$/#*!/#-*0"#'
) .
)/0-)'
) .
%

)//*/#
( $
)
)/#
0-
.#
''
ƽƾǨǚ
x *-/#
*0)ǜ/2*' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜ!*0-/#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ*) -$"#/-/0-)'
)
x *0/#
*0)ǜ*) ' ơ-/0-)'
) Ǜ!*0-/#-*0"#'
) .Ǜ*) -$"#/-/0-)'
)
x ./
*0)ǜ++'$

)/.#
''+-*1$ /#
++-*+-$
/ )0(
-*!/#-*0"#
'
) .Ǜ' ơ-/0-)'
) .Ǜ-$"#/-/0-)'
) .2$/#.0ƣ
$ )/./*-
" .+

*((*
/ +-*%
//-
ƣ
ǚ
# 1 '*+ -.#
''
'$"$
' !*-
./ -)0
'$)-
ƣ

(+

/ ǹ
Ǻ

- $/.!*-/#
*./*!/# '$"$
' $(+-*1 ( )/.
*)./-0
/ *-
*) !*-
3 '0$)"/# '
)
*./*!/# -$"#/-of-2
4Ǜ)*//* 3
/#
*./.#*2)$)/#

ǚ
ƽƿǚǁ
''*)*
ǚ
)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/# 1 '*+( )/of $/# -
-
'
ƽ,
-
'ƾǛ
-
'ƿ*-
-
'ǅ*! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+Ǆǂǂƿ, 1 '*+ -
.#
''
*(+' / /# !*''*2$)"$(+-*1 ( )/.
)
'$"$
' !*-
./ -)0
'$)
-
ƣ

(+

/ ǹ
Ǻ
- $/.!*-/#
*./*!/# '$"$
' $(+-*1 ( )/.

*)./-0
/ *-
*) !*- 3
'0$)"/# '
)
*./*!/# -$"#/-of-2
4, not to
3 /#
*./.#*2)$)/#
:
ƽƿǚǁǚƽ U'/$(
/ 2$ )$)"
)!-*)/
" $(+-*1 ( )/.!*-

''*)*

'*)"/#
-
'ƽ+-*%
/!-*)/
" , $)
'0$)")*-/#
*0)/-
1 '
'
) .
/2 ) I-ǁǄƼ
)/ -
#
)" /*0
'$)*0' 1
-ǚ/- /$(+-*1 ( )/..#
''
$)
'0 Ǜ
0/
- )*/'$($/ /*ǄǨ2$ +-*/
/
$
4 ' '
)
)($)$(0(ƿǨ
2$ ( $
)Ǜ
)($)$(0(ǄǨ2$ .$ 2
'&ǚ#
-*..-.
/$*)*!
''*)*

.#
''#
1
($)$(0(*!!*0-/#-*0"#/-
1 ''
) .$)

#$-
/$*)+'0./0-)
'
) .
//# $)/ -.
/$*).ǝ
)
ƽƿǚǁǚƾ I(+-*1 ( )/.)*-/#*!0
'$)*0' 1
-to +-*1$

*))
/$1$/4/* 3$./$)".$ 2
'&/*/# )*-/#Ǜ$/4

&)*2' " ./#
/
+*-/$*)
*!/# )
..
-4-$"#/*!2
4$.*2)
4
,0$.$/$*).Ǜ

)/#
/$/2*0'
) /*

,0$-
4 1 '*+ -*-/# $/4+-$*-/*$(+-*1 ( )/.*)/#
/
+*-/$*)*!/# -$"#/*!2
4
$)"
*(+' / ǚ# $/4

&)*2' " ./#
//#
612
ƽǂ
- ,0$- ( )/.- '
/ /*/# $(+-*1 ( )/. .
-$
$)/#$.0
.
/$*)ƽƿǚǁ 2$''

.0
%
//**1 -)( )/* .
/$*)ǂǂǀǂƾǚǁǝ
)
ƽƿǚǁǚƿ '
..

$& '
) .$)
*/#$-
/$*).,
*).$./$)"*!
ƿ-
!**/2$ ( $
)
)
)Ǆ-!**/2$
$
4 ' '
) 2$/#+-*/
/ $)/ -.
/$*).
/
1 -4.$")
'$5 $)/ -.
/$*)
'*)"
''*)*
!-*(/#
-ǁǄƼ
)/ -
#
)" /*
)/-
'
-&2
4 + -/# $/4Ǩ.$
4 '
) ./-$
)'
)ǚ
ƽƿǚǂ -*
&*
ǚ
)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/#
)4 1 '*+( )/+-*+*.
'of

-
'ƽ *! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+Ǆǂǂƿ, 1 '*+ -.#
''- ,0 .//#

)*)( )/*!-*
&*
.*0/#*!0
'$) *0' 1
-Ǜ

,0$- /# '
).
/
“F
$-M
-& /V
'0 ”,
)$)
*-+*-
/ /# '
).$)/*$/.+-*%
/Ǜ+-$*-/*$..0
)

*!

0$'$)"+ -($/!*-
-
'ƽǚ# 1

/$*)*!-*
&*
.#
'' 3
'0 /#
+*-/$*)*!-$"#/-of-2
4- . -1 !*-!0/0-
'' 4
$)&+-*%
/ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''
+
4
''
*./.
..*
$
/ 2$/#/# -$"#/-of-2
41

/$*)
)+
-
'

,0$.$/$*)ǚ
# $/42*0'*Ƣ. /
)4 1 '*+ -
*./.
..*
$
/ 2$/#/# 1 '*+ -*-/#
$/4

,0$-$)"/#
,0$.$/$*).Ǜ

'
). .
-$
$).0
.
/$*)ƽƿǚǁ, !-*(
/#
(*0)/.+
4 '
4 1 '*+ -!*-/#

,0$.$/$*)*!/*-be-

)*) -*
&
*
ǚ
ƽƿǚǃ
./- .//- /S*0/#*!0
'$)*0' 1
-ǚ )' ..-*
&*

$.(
$)/
$)
.
+-$1
/ ./- /Ǜ
-
'ƽ *! ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+Ǆǂǂƿ
.#
''$)
'0
+-$1
/ ./- //#
/-0).+
-
'' '/*0
'$)*0' 1
-
*))
/$)"/*

''*)*

//#e $)/ -.
/$*)2$/#
''*)G
/ 2
4 )0
'$)*0' 1
-
)
-*
&*
$)/ -.
/$*)Ǜ2#$
#./- /.#
''$)
'0
$
4 '
)+ ./-$
)

*))
/$1$/4ǚ
ƽƿǚǄ I-ǁǄƼȍ
''*)*

)/ -
#
)"
$-#
- ǚ# 1 '*+ -
.#
'' +
4/# !
$-.#
- /*2
-. /#
*)./-0
/$*)*!/# #
. ƾI-ǁǄƼȍ
''*)*

)/ -
#
)" $(+-*1 ( )/.)*'
/ -/#
)ǅƼ-

4.
ơ --
*-
/$*)*!/# Ɵ-./
- .$ )/$
'Ɵ)
'(
+ǹ-

/Ǆǂǂǂ*-ǄǂǂǃǺ
))*
0$'$)"+ -($/.!*-/#
- .$ )/$
' 1 '*+( )/.#
''
$..0 0)/$'/# !
$-.#
- +
4( )/#
.
)
(
ǚ # !
$-.#
- 2$''
/ -($)

. *)/# #
. ƾ
)/ -
#
)"
*./

)/# $/4Ǩ.
*

'-
).+*-
/$*))
'4.$.
)
)4
$/$*)
'
)
'4.$..0
%
//*

++-*1
'*!/# $/4)"$) -ǚ#*0'/# /-$+.
..*
$
/ 2$/#

/0
'
1 '*+( )/ on
)4*! $/# -
-
'ƽǛ
-
'ƾǛ
-
'ƿ*-
-
'ǅ*! ./$)"
)/
/$1 -

/
+Ǆǂǂƿ
' ../#
)0. /*

'
ul
/ /# !
$--.#
- +
4( )/Ǜ
/# $/42$''
*).$ -
)
++-*+-$
/ - !0)/*/# /# )-*2) -*!.0
#+
-
'to
- Ơ
//# - 0
)0(
-*!/-$+.ǚ
613
ƽǃ
ƽƿǚǅ #$
' -$+ 0
/$*)2$/#-
).+*-/
/$*) (
)

)
" ( )/ǚ To - 0
/# $(+

/*!/# +-*%
/" ) -
/ /-
ƣ

'*)"
''*)
R*

)0
'$)*0' 1
-, 1 '*+ -.#
''
- ,0$- /*+- +
-
)
$(+' ( )/$)
*)%0)
/$*)2$/#

#.0
. ,0 )/$/ 1 '*+( )/ 1$ 2
ǹ“SDR”Ǻ
-
).+*-/
/$*) (
)
)
" ( )/p'
)ǹǩ+'
)ǪǺ/*- 0

1 #$
' /-$+./*
)!-*(/# +-*%
/.$/ ǹ.ǺǛ/*/# .
/$.!

/$*)*!/# $/4
)"$) -ǚ# +'
).#
''$)
'0 /-$+- 0
/$*)(
.0- .)
..
-4/*

#$ 1
($)$(0(*1 -
''/
-" /*!/-$+- 0
/$*)/*- 0
+
&#*0-/-$+.
4
ƽƼʷ *-
)
++-*+-$
/
(*0)/*!/-$+- 0
/$*)

. on future /-
).+*-/
/$*)

)
'4.$.
0/)*/' ../#
)ƽƼʷ !*-*ƣ

)- .$ )/$
'0. .ǚ# p'
).#
''

'.*$)
'0
)$(+' ( )/ ./
)
" ( )/-

/$
.ǹ.Ǻ!*-/#
- /
$'0. .ǚ#
*)$/$*)..#
''- ,0$- $/4
++-*1
'*!/# +'
)+-$*-
/*/# $..0
)
*!

-/$Ɵ

/ *!*

0+
)
4!*-/# Ɵ-./
0$'$)"ǚ# +'
)
.#
''- ,0$-
))0
'- +*-/$)"*!/-$+.Ǜ.0-1 4.,
)/# (
&$)"*!- 1$.$*)./*
/# +'
)
.) /*( //# /-$+- 0
/$*)/
-" /.*-/#- .#*'./*/#
.
/$.!

/$*)*!/# $/4)"$) -ǚ #$
' /-$+- 0
/$*).2$''
(
.0-
/#-*0"#
*0)/.*!1 #$
' ./#
/ )/ -
) 3$//# .$/
)
4
*(+
-$.*)*!/#
- .0'/./* ./

'$.# /-$+/#- .#*'.ǚ- 0
/$*)/
-" /.2$''

++'$ /*
./

'$.#/# /#- .#*'.ǚ# ./$(
/ .
)/#- .#*'.2$''
- 1$ 2
)

++-*1
4/# $/4 Engineerǚ
(
.0- ./#
//
-" /*ƣ
(+'*4 ..#
''
.
-$
$) /
$'$)
/# p'
)Ǜ$)
'0$)"$)!*-(
/$*)- "
-$)"/# $-
/$(+' ( )/$)"+
-/4ǚ
# !*''*2$)"(
.0- ..#
''

*).$ - !*-$)
'0.$*)$)/# p'
)ǚ
ƽƿǚǅǚƽ On-.$/ .0++*-/!

$'$/$ .$)
'0$)"
$
4 ' +
/#.Ǜ
+ ./-$
)+
/#.'$)&$)"
0$'$)".
)

0../*+.ǚ
ƽƿǚǅǚƾ
)
0$'$)".0++*-/!

$'$/$ .$)
'0$)".#*2 -.Ǜ

#
)"$)"-**(.Ǜ
$
4 ' ./*-
" -**(.
)
$
4 ' -

&.ǚ
ƽƿǚǅǚƿ $ .#
-$)"*+/$*).!*-'*)"$./
)

*((0/ -..0
#

-+**'
)1
)+**'(
/
#$)". -1$
.ǚ
ƽƿǚǅǚǀ0
-
)/ -$ #*( . -1$
.!*-
*((0/ -.2#*

-+**'Ǜ/
& /-
).$/*-
$
4 ' /*2*-&ǚ
ƽƿǚǅǚǁ $)
)
$
'$)
)/$1 ..0
#
.+- -/
3
) Ɵ/.!*-/-
).$/

)
$
4 ' 3+ ). .ǹ ǚ"ǚǛ*((0/ -#
&Ǻ*-.0
.$$5 /-
).$/+
.. .ǹ ǚ"ǚǛ
*((0/ -#
&.Ǜ'$++ -
-.Ǻ!*-
'' (+'*4 .ǚ
614
ƽǄ
ƽƿǚƽƼ0/0- -
).+*-/
/$*))
'4.$.ǚ 1 '*+ -

&)*2' " ./#
/
future $/ 1 '*+( )/ 1$ 2
++-*1
'.2$''- ,0$-
$/$*)
'/-
).+*-/
/$*)

)
'4.$.Ǜ$)
'0$)"
0/)*/'$($/ /*/# !*''*2$)" ǹ
-
'- ! - )
.
- /*

-
' .$")
/$*).$) ./$)" )/
/$1 -

/
+ǄǂǂƿǺ:
ƽƿǚƽƼǚƽ # +'
))

..
'*)"0
'$)*0' 1
-/*

-
'ƽ
)
-
'ƾǛ
/2 )
''*)*

)-*
&*
ǚ
ƽƿǚƽƼǚƾ #
./-2 ./
*))
/$*)
/2 )
''*)

/ 2
4$)/ -.
/$*)
)/# .$")
'$5 $)/ -.
/$*)*!0
'$)*0' 1
-ȍ-*
&
*
ǚ
ƽƿǚƽƼǚƿ # $)/ -.
/$*)*!0
'$)*0' 1
-ȍ-*
&
*
ǚ
ƽƿǚƽƼǚǀ # +'
))

..
'*)"0
'$)*0' 1
-/*

-
'ƿ
)
-
'ǅǚ
ƽƿǚƽƼǚǁ 1 -. Ƣ
/./*/#
''*)*
-'#
--*
*
ȍ
-ǁǄƼ
)/ -
#
)" ǚ
ƽƿǚƽƼǚǂ 1 -. Ƣ
/./*/# 0
'$)*0' 1
-ȍ
''*)
*
$)/ -.
/$*)ǚ
ƽƿǚƽƽ
)/# 1 )/*!
)4
*)Ơ$
/
/2 )/#$.
/$*)ƽƿ
)/#

*)$/$*).*!
++-*1
'!*-/# -*%
/++-*1
'.- "
-$)"/# 0
'$

(+-*1 ( )/. .
-$
$)/#$.
/$*)ƽƿǛ/# / -(.*!/#$.
/$*)ƽƿ.#
''

*)/-*'ǚ
ƽǀǚ Amendment or Cancellationǚ
ƽǀǚƽ *$Ɵ

/$*)

0. *!*)Ơ$
/2$/#/
/ *- -
'

2.ǚ
# -*%
/
)-*+ -/4.#
''
.0
%
//*./
/
)! -
''

2.
)
- "0'
/$*).
)/#$."- ( )/* .)*/
-
/
)41 ./ -$"#/$)./
/
)
! -
''

2.
)- "0'
/$*).$) Ƣ
/*)/# Ƣ
/$1
/ ǚ If ./
/ *-! -
'
'

2.*-- "0'
/$*). )

/
ơ -/# Ƣ
/$1
/ *!/#$."- ( )/+- 1 )/*-
+-
'0
*(+'$
)
2$/#*) *-(*- +-*1$.$*).*!/#$."- ( )/*-- ,0$-

#
)" .$)+'
).Ǜ(
+.*-+ -($/.
++-*1
4/# $/4Ǜ/#
-/$ ..#
''( /

)
*)! -$)"**!
$/#$)
-
.*)

'
// (+//*(*$!4/#$."- ( )//*

*(+'42$/#.0
#! -
'*-./
/ '
2*-- "0'
/$*)ǚ )4.0
#
( )( )/*-
.0.+ ).$*)*!/# "- ( )/.#
''
.0
%
//*
++-*1
'
4/# $/4*0)
$'ǹ$)

*-
)
2$/##
+/ -ǄǚǁǂǺǚ

#
-/4
"- ./* 3/ )/*/# */# -$/.
615
ƽǅ
+-*(+/
)-
.*)

'
**+ -
/$*)$).*(*$!4$)"/#$."- ( )/*-
++-*1
+'
).ǚ
ƽǀǚƾ ( )( )/*! 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
40/0
'*). )/ǚ
#$."- ( )/(
ƽ4

( ) $)2-$/$)"!-*(/$( /*/$(
4(0/0
'

*). )/*!/#
-/$ .# - /*
)$)

*-
)
2$/#/# +-*
0- .*!/#
1 '*+( )/"- ( )//
/0/
)#
+/ -Ǆǚǁǂǚ 1$ 2
)
++-*1
'*!
)

( )( )//*/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/.#
''
./-$
/'4'$($/ /*

*).$ -
/$*)*!*)'4/#*. +-*1$.$*)./*

*-(*$Ɵ ǚ*
( )( )/Ǜ
(*$Ɵ

/$*)Ǜ2
$1 -, *-
#
)" /*/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/*-
)4+-*1$.$*)
# - *!.#
''
Ƣ
/$1 !*-
)4+0-+*. 0)' ...+
$Ɵ

''4. /!*-/#$)
2-$/$)"
/#
/ 3+- ..'4- ! -./*/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
).$")
4/# 0'4

0/#*-$5 - +- . )/
/$1 .*!
*/#
-/$ .ǚ
ƽǀǚƾǚƽ
-/$
'( )( )/ǚ# )

-/4. &$)".0
#
)

( )( )/*2).*-#
.
) ,0$/

' -$"#//**)'4
+*-/$*)*!/# 2#*' *!/#
-*+ -/4ǹ“Portion”ǺǛ/# ).0
#
-/4(
4*)'4. &
( )( )/*!/#$.
"- ( )/
.$-
/'4- '
/ ./*/# *-/$*)Ǜ
)/#
-/4*2)$)"
)4*/# -
*-/$*).#
'')*/
- ,0$- *- )/$/' /*

.$")
/*-4*-/*
*). )//*
)

( )( )//#
/
Ƣ
/.*)'4
)*/# -
-/4Ǩ.*-/$*)ǚ
ƽǀǚƿ ( )( )/.ǚ )4
( )( )/./*/#$."- ( )/2#$
#
- '
/ /*ǹ
Ǻ/# -(ǝǹ
Ǻ/# + -($// 0. .*!/# -*+ -/4
.+-*1$ $)
+
-
"-
+#ǁǚƽǝǹ
Ǻ+-*1$.$*).!*-“.$")$Ɵ

)/” - . -1
/$*)*- $

/$*)*!'
)ǝ
ǹǺ
*)$/$*).Ǜ/ -(.Ǜ- ./-$
/$*).*-- ,0$- ( )/.!*-.0
. ,0 )/$.
- /$*)
-4

/$*).ǝǹ Ǻ
)$)
-
. $)/# ).$/4*-$)/ ).$/4*!0. *!/# *1 -
''-*%
/ǝǹ! Ǻ
/# (
3$(0(# $"#/*-.$5 *!+-*+*.
0$'$)".ǝ*-ǹ"Ǻ(*) /
-4

*)/-$
0/$*).
4 1 '*+ -
.+-*1$ $)/#$."- ( )/Ǜ.#
''
(
n
“Amendment”
).#
''- ,0$- )*/$
*-+0
'$
#
-$)"
!*- /# '
))$)"
*(($..$*)
)/# $/4*0)
$'
!*- /#
-/$ .(
4 3
0/
)
( )( )/
# - /*ǚ # $/4Ǩ.0
'$
*-&.$-
/*-.#
'' / -($) 2# /# -
- . -1
/$*)
*- $

/$*)$.“.$")$Ɵ

)/” $)/#
*)/ 3/*!/# *1 -
''-*%
/ǚ
ƽǀǚǀ '
-$Ɵ

/$*).ǚ
!
)2# )Ǜ!-*(/$( /*/$( Ǜ0-$)"/#
-(*!/#$."- ( )/Ǜ$/4
) 1 '*+ -
"- - Ɵ) ( )/.
)
'
-$Ɵ

/$*).

- )
..
-4*-
++-*+-$
/ 2$/#- .+
//*/# /
$'.*!+ -!*-(
)
*!$/4

) 1 '*+ -# - 0) -Ǜ$/4
) 1 '*+ -.#
'' Ƣ
/0
/ .0
#
'
-$Ɵ

/$*).
/#-*0"#' // -
"- ( )/.ǹ

#Ǜ
“ClariƟcation”Ǻ
++-*1
4$/4
)
1 '*+ -Ǜ2#$
#Ǜ
ơ - 3
0/$*)Ǜ.#
''

//

# # - /*
.
)

)

*(
+
-/# - *!Ǜ
)(
4
!0-/# -
'
-$Ɵ !-*(/$( /* /$(
.
)
..
-42$/#!0/0-
++-*1
'
4$/4
) 1 '*+ -ǚ*.0
#'
-$Ɵ

/$*)
616
ƾƼ
.#
''
*)./$/0/
)
( )( )//*/#$."- ( )/- ,0$-$)"+0
'$
)*/$
*-
#
-$)"ǚ# $/4
)
" -*-#$.*-# - .$") .#
''#
1 /#
0/#*-$/4/*
/ -($) *)
#
'!*!$/42# /# -
- ,0 ./
'
-$Ɵ

/$*)$.*!.0
#

#
-

/ -/*
*)./$/0/
)( )( )/.0
%
//*
/$*)ƽǀǚƿ *-
'
-$Ɵ

/$*)
.0
%
//*/#$.
/$*)ƽǀǚǀǚ # $/4
)
" -.#
''#
1 /#
0/#*-$/4/*
- 1$ 2Ǜ
++-*1 Ǜ
) 3
0/ '
-$Ɵ

/$*)./*/#$."- ( )/+-*1$ /#
/.0
#
'
-$Ɵ

/$*).
- )*/( )( )/.ǚ
ƽǀǚǁ
)
''
/$*)
40/0
'*). )/ǚ 3
+/
.*/# -2$.
+ -($// # - $)Ǜ/#$."- ( )/(
4

)
' $)2#*' *-$)+
-/*)'4
4
/# (0/0
'
*). )/*!/# +
-/$ .*-/# $-.0

..*-.$)$)/ - ./Ǜ$)

*-
)

2$/#/# +-*1$.$*).*!/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )//
/0/
)#
+/ -
Ǆǚǁǂǚ )4! .+
$+0-.0
)//*/#$."- ( )/+-$*-/*/#
/ *!

)
''
/$*)
.#
''
- /
$)
4/# $/4ǚ
ƽǁǚ Annual Reviewǚ
ƽǁǚƽ 1$ 2
/ ǚ#
))0
'- 1$ 2
/ !*-/#$."- ( )/.#
''

/2 )
0'4ƽǁ
)0"0./ƽǁǛƾƼƾǀǛ
)/# -
ơ -
/2 )

#
0'4ƽǁ
)
0"0./ƽǁ0-$)"/# -(ǚ 1$ 2.#
''

*)0
/ $)

*-
)
2$/#

/$*)ǄǚǁǂǚƽǀƼ*!#
+/ -Ǆǚǁǂ
)/# +-*1$.$*).*!/#$.
/$*)ƽǁǚ
ƽǁǚƾ
)$/$
/$*)*! 1$ 2ǚ# $/4Ǩ.*((0)$/4 1 '*+( )/
$-
/*-.#
''$)$/$
/ /#
))0
'- 1$ 2Ǜ
.- ,0$- 0) -
/$*)ǄǚǁǂǚƽǀƼ*!
#
+/ -ǄǚǁǂǛ
4"$1$)"/* 1 '*+ -/#$-/4ǹƿƼǺ

4.+-$*-2-$// ))*/$
/#
//#
$/4$)/ )./*0) -/
& .0
#- 1$ 2ǚ*/' ../#
)/#$-/4ǹƿƼǺ

4.
ơ --
$+/
*!/# )*/$
Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''+-*1$ 1$ )
/*/# $-
/*-Ǜ
.-
.*)

'4
/ -($) )
..
-4
4/# $-
/*-Ǜ/* (*)./-
/ "**!
$/#
*(+'$
)

2$/#/# (
/ -$
'/ -(.
)+-*1$.$*).*!/# "- ( )/
./*/# 2#*' *-
- ' 1
)/+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4*2)
4 1 '*+ -ǚ #
0- )*!+-**!
4
.0
./
)/$
' 1$ )
*!
*(+'$
)
$.0+*) 1 '*+ -ǚ
ƽǁǚƿ /
Ƣ +*-/.ǚ*/# 3/ )/+-

'Ǜ/# $/4.#
'' +*.$/$)
/# (
$'/* 1 '*+ -

*+4*!
''./
Ƣ- +*-/.Ǜ
)- '
/ 3#$
$/.
*)
-)$)"

*)/-

/+ -!*-(
)

/'
./Ɵ1

4.+-$*-/*
)4+0
'$
#
-$)"
- ..$)"

))0
'- 1$ 2ǚ
ƽǁǚǀ *./.ǚ *./.-
.*)

'4$)
0--
4/# $/4$)
*))
/$*)
2$/#/#
))0
'- 1$ 2.#
''
+
$
4 1 '*+ -$)

*-
)
2$/#/# $/4Ǩ.
.
# 0' *!! .$) Ƣ
/
//# /$( *!- 1$ 2ǚ
617
ƾƽ
ƽǂǚ Defaultǚ
ƽǂǚƽ ( $ .1
$'

' ǚ+*)/# *

0-- )
*!
) 1 )/*!
!
0'/Ǜ/#
-/$ .(
4+0-.0
''- ( $ .
/'
2*-$) ,0$/42#$
#
- )*/
*/# -2$. +-*1$ !*-$)/#$."- ( )/*-$)/# $/4Ǩ.- "0' /$*)."*1 -)$)"
1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/.Ǜ 3+- ..'4$)
'0$)"Ǜ
0/)*/'$($/ /*Ǜ/# - ( 4*!
.+
$Ɵ
+ -!*-(
)
*!/#$."- ( )/ǚ
ƽǂǚƾ */$

)0- ǚ+*)/# *

0-- )
*!
) 1 )/*! !
0'/

4 $/# -
-/4Ǜ/# )*)- !
0'/$)"+
-/4.#
''. -1 2-$// ))*/$
*!.0
#
!
0'/0+*)/# !
0'/$)"
-/4ǚ0
%
//*
*-/"
" Ǩ.-$"#//*
0-
+0-.0
)//*
/$*) ƽǂǚƾ # - *!Ǜi!/# !
0'/$.)*/
0-
4/# !
0'/$)"
-/4
2$/#$)/#$-/4ǹƿƼǺ

4.
ơ -. -1$
*!.0
#)*/$
*! !
0'/Ǜ/# )*)- !
0'/$)"

-/4(
4/# )
*(( )

)4' "
'*- ,0$/

/$*)/* )!*-
$/.-$"#/.
0) -/#$."- ( )/ǝ+-*1$ Ǜ#*2 1 -Ǜ/#
/$!/# !
0'/

))*/

0-
2$/#$).0
#/#$-/4ǹƿƼǺ
4+ -$*Ǜ/# )*)- !
0'/$)"
-/4.#
''- !-
$)!-*(

)4.0
#' "
'*- ,0$/

/$*).*'*)"
./# !
0'/$)"
-/4
"$)./*
0-
.0
# !
0'/2$/#$).0
#/#$-/4 ǹƿƼǺ
4+ -$*
)$'$" )/'4+0-.0 ..0
#
0-
/*
*(+' /$*)ǚAny n*/$
*! !
0'/"$1 )# - 0) -.#
''.+
$!4$) /
$'/#
)
/0- *!/# !
$'0- .$)+ -!*-(
)
/#
//# )*/$
$)"
-/4
'
$(.
*)./$/0/ .
/# e1 )/*! !
0'/Ǜ
''!

/.
*)./$/0/$)".0
./
)/$
' 1$ )
*!.0
#!
$'0- Ǜ

)#*2 .0
#!
$'0- (
4
.
/$.!

/*-$'4
0- $)

*-
)
2$/#/# / -(.

)
*)$/$*).*!/#$."- ( )/ǚ0-$)"/# /$( + -$*.# - $).+ $Ɵ !*-

0- *!
!
$'0- *!+ -!*-(
)
Ǜ/#
-/4
#
-" /# - 2$/#.#
'')*/

*).$ - /*
$) !
0'/!*-+0-+*. .*!ǹ
Ǻ/ -($)
/$*)*!/#$."- ( )/Ǜǹ
Ǻ
$)./$/0/$*)*!' "
'+-*
$)".2$/#- .+
//# - /*Ǜ*-ǹ
Ǻ$..0
)
*!
)4

++-*1
'2$/#- .+
//*/# -*%
/ǚ
$'0- /*"$1 )*/$
.#
'')*/
*)./$/0/

2 $1 -*!
)4 !
0'/ǚ
ƽǂǚƿ *
(
" .
"
$)./$/4ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"
)4/#$)"/*/#

*)/-
-4
*)/
$) # - $)Ǜ$))* 1 )/.#
''
(
" .

2 -
"
$).//#
$/40+*)
) 1 )/*! !
0'/*-0+*)/ -($)
/$*)*!/#$."- ( )/ǚ
ƽǃǚ Estoppel CertiƟcateǚ $/# -
-/4(
4Ǜ
/
)4/$( Ǜ
)!-*(/$(
/*/$( Ǜ- ,0 ./2-$// ))*/$
!-*(/# */# -
-/4- ,0 ./$)".0
#+
-/4/*

-/$!4$)2-$/$)"/#
/Ǜǹ
Ǻ/#$."- ( )/$.$)!0''!*-

) Ƣ
/
)

$)$)"
*
'$"
/$*)*!/#
-/$ .ǝ ǹ
Ǻ/#$."- ( )/#
.)*/
)
( ) *-(*$Ɵ
$/# -*-
''4*-$)2-$/$)"Ǜ*-$!.*
( ) Ǜ$ )/$!4$)"/#
( )( )/.ǝ
)
ǹ
Ǻ/*/# &)*2' " *!/#
-/$!4$)"
-/4Ǜ/# - ,0 ./$)"
-/4$.)*/$) !
0'/
$)/# + -!*-(
)
*!$/.*
'$"
/$*).0) -/#$."- ( )/Ǜ*-$!$) !
0'/Ǜ/*
.
-$
/# - $)/# )
/0-
)
(*0)/*!
)4.0
# !
0'/.ǚ
-/4-
$1$)"

618
ƾƾ
- ,0 ./# - 0) -.#
'' 3
0/
)- /0-).0
#
-/$Ɵ

/ 2$/#$)/#$-/4 ǹƿƼǺ

4.!*''*2$)"/# -
$+//# - *!Ǜ*-.0
#'*)" -+ -$*
.(
4-
.*)

"- /*
4/#
-/$ .ǚ # $/4
)
" -*!/# $/4.#
''

0/#*-$5 /*
3 0/
)4
-/$Ɵ

/ - ,0 ./
4 1 '*+ -ǚ #*0'/#
-/4-
$1$)"/#
- ,0 ./)*/ 3
0/
)- /0-).0
#
-/$Ɵ

/ 2$/#$)/#
++'$

' + -$*Ǜ/#$.
.#
'')*/
( /*

!
0'/Ǜ+-*1$ /#
/.0
#
-/4.#
''
( /*
#
1
-/$Ɵ /#
//# ./
/ ( )/.$)
'

0. .ǹ
Ǻ/#-*0"#ǹ
Ǻ*!/#$.
/$*)
-
/-0 Ǜ
)
)4
-/4(
4- '4*).0
# (
-/$Ɵ

/$*)ǚ $/4

&)*2' " .
/#
/

-/$Ɵ

/ # - 0) -(
4
- '$ 0+*)
4-
).! - .ǹ
. Ɵ) $)

/$*)ƾƽǚƾǺ
) *-/"
" .ǹ
. Ɵ) $)
/$*) ƽǄǚƽǺǚ
ƽǄǚ Mortgagee Protectionǝ Certain Rights of Cureǚ
ƽǄǚƽ *-/"
" -*/
/$*)ǚ#$."- ( )/.#
''
.0+ -$*-
)
. )$*-/*
)4'$ )+'

0+*)/# -*+ -/4Ǜ*-
)4+*-/$*)/# - *!
ơ -/#
/
*!-
*-$)"/#$."- ( )/Ǜ$)
'0$)"/# '$ )!*-
)4 *!/-0./ *-(*-/"
"
ǹ“Mortgage”Ǻǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"/# !*- "*$)"Ǜ)*
-

## - *!.#
'' !
/Ǜ
- ) -$)1
'$Ǜ$($)$.#*-$(+
$-/# '$ )*!
)4*-/"
" (
$)"**!
$/#

)!*-1
'0 Ǜ
0/
''/# / -(.
)
*)$/$*).
*)/
$) $)/#$."- ( )/.#
''

$)$)"0+*)
) Ƣ
/$1
"
$)./
)4+ -.*)*- )/$/4Ǜ$)
'0$)"
)4 *!
/-0./
) Ɵ
$
-4*-(*-/"
" ǹ“Mortgagee”Ǻ2#*

,0$- ./$/' /*/# -*+ -/4Ǜ
*-
)4+*-/$*)/# - *!Ǜ
4!*-
'*.0- Ǜ/-0./ Ǩ..
' Ǜ $)'$ 0*!!*-
'*.0- Ǜ
*-*/# -2$. ǚ
ƽǄǚƾ *-/"
" */
'$"
/ ǚ*/2$/#./
)$)"/# +-*1$.$*).*!

/$*)ƽǄǚƽ

*1 Ǜ)**-/"
" .#
''#
1
)4*
'$"
/$*)*-0/40) -/#$.
"- ( )/Ǜ
!*- *-
ơ -!*-
'*.0- *-
$)'$ 0*!!*-
'*.0- Ǜ/*

*)./-0
/*-
*(+' / /#
*)./-0
/$*)*!$(+-*1 ( )/.Ǜ*-/*"0
-
)/ .0
#

*)./-0
/$*)*!$(+-*1 ( )/.Ǜ*-/*"0
-
)/ .0
#
*)./-0
/$*)*-
*(+' /$*)Ǜ
*-/*+
4Ǜ+ -!*-(*-+-*1$
)4! Ǜ $

/$*)Ǜ$(+-*1 ( )/.*-*/# -
3 /$*)*-$(+*.$/$*)ǝ+-*1$ Ǜ#*2 1 -Ǜ/#
/
*-/"
" .#
'')*/
)/$/'
/* 1*/ /# -*+ -/4/*
)40. .*-/*
*)./-0
/
)4$(+-*1 ( )/./# - *)
*/# -/#
)/#*. 0. .*-$(+-*1 ( )/.+-*1$ !*-*-
0/#*-$5
4/# -*%
/
++-*1
'.*-
4/#$."- ( )/ǚ
ƽǄǚƿ */$
*! !
0'//**-/"
"
)3/ ).$*)*!$"#//*0- ǚ

!/# $/4-
$1 .)*/$
!-*(
*-/"
" - ,0 ./$)"

*+4*!
)4)*/$
*!
!
0'/"$1 ) 1 '*+ -# - 0) -
).+
$!4$)"/#
- ..!*-. -1$

/# - *!Ǜ/# )/# $/4.#
'' '$1 -/*.0
#*-/"
" Ǜ
*)
0-- )/'42$/#. -1$

/# - *)/* 1 '*+ -Ǜ
)4)*/$
"$1 )/* 1 '*+ -2$/#- .+
//*
)4
'
$(
4
/# $/4/#
/ 1 '*+ -#
.
*(($//
) 1 )/*! !
0'/ǚ

#*-/"
" .#
''
619
ƾƿ
#
1 /# -$"#/0-$)"/# .
( + -$*
1 $'

' /* 1 '*+ -/*
0- *-- ( 4Ǜ
*-/*
*(( )
/*
0- *-- ( 4Ǜ/# 1 )/*! !
0'/
'
$( . /!*-/#$)/#
$/4Ǩ.)*/$
ǚ# $/4Ǜ/#-*0"#$/.$/4
)
" -Ǜ(
4 3/ )/# /#$-/4-
4
0-
+ -$*+-*1$ $)+
-
"-
+#ƽƾǚƾ!*-)*/(*- /#
)
)
$/$*)
'.$3/4

4.
0+*)- ,0 ./*! 1 '*+ -*-
*-/"
" ǚ
ƽǅǚ Severabilityǚ # 0) )!*-

$'$/4Ǜ$)1
'$$/4*-$'' "
'$/4*!
)4
+-*1$.$*).Ǜ
*1 )
)/Ǜ
*)$/$*), *-/ -(*!/#$."- ( )/.#
'')*/- ) -/#
*/# -+-*1$.$*).0) )!*-

' Ǜ$)1
'$*-$'' "
'ǝ+-*1$ /#
/Ǜ$!/#
0) )!*-

$'$/4Ǜ$)1
'$
/$*)Ǜ*-$'' "
'$/42*0' +-$1 $/# -$/4*-
1 '*+ -*!(
/ -$
'
) Ɵ/. -$1 !-*(/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/Ǜ*-
(
& + -!*-(
)
0) -/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/0)-
.*)

'4$ƣ
0'/Ǜ
/# )$/4
) 1 '*+ -.#
''( /
)
*)! -
).#
''(
& "** !
$/# Ƣ*-/.
/*
( )*-(*$!4/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/$)
(
)) -/#
/$.(0/0
''4

' /*$/4
) 1 '*+ -ǚ
ƾƼǚ AttorneysǨ Fees and Costsǚ
ƾƼǚƽ - 1
$'$)"
-/4ǚ
!/# $/4*- 1 '*+ -$)$/$
/ .
)4

/$*)
/
'
2*-$) ,0$/4/* )!*-
*-$)/ -+- //# / -(.
)
*)$/$*).*!/#$.
"- ( )/Ǜ/# +- 1
$'$)"+
-/4.#
''
)/$/' /*-
*1 --
.*)

//*-) 4.Ǩ ! .
)
*./.$)
$/$*)/*
)4*/# -- '$ !/*2#$
#$/(
4*/# -2$.

)/$/' ǚ
ƾƼǚƾ #$-
-/4#
'' )" ǚ
!
)4+ -.*)*- )/$/4)*/
+
-/4/*
/#$."- ( )/$)$/$
/ .
)

/$*)
/'
2*-$) ,0$/4/*
#
'' )" /# 1
'$$/4*!

)4/# -*%
/++-*1
'. ǹ$)
'0$)"/#$."- ( )/Ǻ, /#
-/$ ..#
''
**+ -
/
$) ! )$)".0
#

/$*)ǚ#
-/$ .# -
4
"- /*
ƣ-(
/$1 '4
**+ -
/ $)
! )$)".
$

/$*)
)/* 3
0/
%*$)/ ! ).
)
*)Ɵ )/$
'$/4

"- ( )/$)*- -/*.#
-
)+-*/
/$)!*-(
/$*)Ǜ0) -/# %*$)/ ! ).
+-$1$' " -
*")$5 0) -
++'$

' '
2ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''

-$/.*2)
*./.*!
! ).
.
-
'+
-/4$)$)/ - ./$)
)4.0
#

/$*)
) .#
''- $(
0-. /# $/4
!*-
''-
.*)

'
*0-/
*./.
)
//*-) 4.Ǩ! . 3+ )
4/# $/4$) ! ).
*!
)4.0
#

/$*)*-*/# -+-*
$)"ǚ
ƾƽǚ Transfers and Assignmentsǚ
ƾƽǚƽ "- ( )/0).2$/#/#

)ǚ''*!/# +-*1$.$*).Ǜ-$"#/.Ǜ
/ -(.Ǜ
*1 )
)/.Ǜ
)*
'$"
/$*).
*)/
$) $)/#$."- ( )/.#
''

$)$)"
upon
)$)0- /*/#
) Ɵ/*!/#
-/$ .
)/# $-- .+
/$1 # $-.Ǜ.0

..*-.

)
..$") .Ǜ- +- . )/
/$1 .Ǜ' .. .Ǜ
)
''*/# -+ -.*).

,0$-$)"/#
-*+ -/4Ǜ*-
)4+*-/$*)/# - *!Ǜ*-
)4$)/ - .//# - $)Ǜ2# /# -
4*+ -
/$*)*!
620
ƾǀ
'
2*-$)
)4(
)) -2#
/.* 1 -ǚ''*!/# +-*1$.$*).*!/#$."- ( )/.#
''

)!*-

'
. ,0$/

' . -1$/0
).#
''
*)./$/0/
*1 )
)/.-0))$)"
2$/#/# '
)+0-.0
)//*
++'$

' '

2.Ǜ$)
'0$)"Ǜ
0/)*/'$($/ /*Ǜ
/$*)
ƽǀǂǄ*!/# $1$' * *!/# /
/ *!
'$!*-)$
ǚ

#
*1 )
)//**Ǜ*-- !-
$)
!-*(*$)"Ǜ.*(

/*)/# -*+ -/4# - 0) -Ǜ*-2$/#- .+
//*
)4*2)
+-*+ -/4Ǜǹ
Ǻ$.!*-/#
) Ɵ/*!.0
#+-*+ -/$ .
)$.

0- )0+*).0
#
+-*+ -/$ .Ǜǹ
Ǻ-0).2$/#.0
#+-*+ -/$ .Ǜ
)ǹ
Ǻ$.
$)$)"0+*)

#+
-/4
)

#.0

..$1 *2) -0-$)"$/.*2) -.#$+*!.0
#+-*+ -/$ .*-
)4+*-/$*)
/# - *!Ǜ
).#
''

) Ɵ//*
)

0- )0+*)

#+
-/4
)$/.+-*+ -/4
# - 0) -
)

#*/# -+ -.*).0

$)"/*
)$)/ - ./$).0
#+-*+ -/$ .ǚ
ƾƽǚƾ $"#//*..$")ǚ 1 '*+ -(
42$.#/*. ''Ǜ/-
).! -, *-
..$")

''*-+*-/$*).*!$/.-*+ -/4/**/# - 1 '*+ -.ǹ

#.0
#*/# - 1 '*+ -$.
- ! -- /*
.
“Transferee”Ǻǚ
)
*))
/$*)2$/#
)4.0
#.
' Ǜ/-
).! -*-

..$")( )//*
-
).! - Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''#
1 /# -$"#//* . ''Ǜ/-
).! -*-

..$")/*.0
#-
).! -
)4*-
''-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.
)*
'$"
/$*).*! 1 '*+ -

-$.$)"# - 0) -
)/#
/+ -/
$)/*/# +*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4
$)".*'*-
/-
).! -- Ǜ/*.0
#-
).! - Ǜ+-*1$ Ǜ#*2 1 -Ǜ/#
/ǜ 3
+/
.+-*1$
# - $)Ǜ)*.0
#/-
).! -Ǜ.
' *-
..$")( )/*! 1 '*+ -Ǩ.-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.
)
*
'$"
/$*).# - 0) -.#
''*

0-2$/#*0/+-$*-2-$// ))*/$
/*$/4
)

++-*1
'
4/# $/4
)
" -Ǜ2#$
#
++-*1
'.#
'')*/
0)-
.*)

'4
2$/## 'Ǜ
*)$/$*) Ǜ *- '
4 ǚ
ƾƽǚƿ ++-*1
'
)*/$
*!
' Ǜ-
).! -*-..$")( )/ǚ# $/4

)
" -.#
''
*).$ -
)
$ *)
)4/-
).! -Ǜ.
' Ǜ *-
..$")( )/*!/#$.
"- ( )/2$/#$)ten ǹƽƼǺ

4.
ơ - 1 '*+ -Ǩ.)*/$
Ǜ+-*1$
'')
..
-4
*
0( )/.Ǜ
-/$Ɵ

/$*).,
)*/# -$)!*-(
/$*)
- +-*1$ /*/# $/4

)
" -/* )

' /# $/4
)
" -/* / -($) 2# /# -/# +-*+*.
-
).! -

)+ -!*-( 1 '*+ -Ǩ.*
'$"
/$*).# - 0) -ǚ*/$
*!
)4.0
#

++-*1 .
' Ǜ/-
).! -Ǜ *-
..$")( )/ǹ2#$
#$)
'0 .
.
-$+/$*) *!
''-$"#/.Ǜ
$)/ - ./.
)*
'$"
/$*)./#
/#
1
)/-
).! --
)/#*. 2#$
##
1
)
- /
$)
4 1 '*+ -Ǻ.#
''
-
*- $)/# *ƣ
$
'-
*-.*!'
(

*0)/4Ǜ$)
!*-(

' /*/# $/4
)
" -Ǜ
*)
0-- )/'42$/#.0
#.
' Ǜ
/-
).! -*-
..$")( )/ǚ
ƾƽǚǀ *).$ -
/$*).!*-++-*1
'*!
' Ǜ-
).! -*-..$")( )/ǚ

)
*).$ -$)"/# - ,0 ./Ǜ/# $/4
)
" -.#
''

. /#
$.$*)0+*)/#
+-*+*.
..$") Ǩ.- +0/
/$*)Ǜ 3+ -$ )
ǛƟ)
)
$
'- .*0-
.,

../*
- $/,

)

$'$/4/*.0

..!0''4

--4*0//# 1 '*+( )/*!/# -*+ -/4/*

*(+' /$*)ǚ # $/4
)
" -Ǩ.
++-*1
'.#
''
!*-/# +0-+*. .of
Ǻ
+-*1$$)")*/$
/*$/4ǝ
Ǻ
..0-$)"/#
/
''*
'$"
/$*).*! 1 '*+ -
-
621
ƾǁ

''*

/
.
/2 ) 1 '*+ -
)/# +-*+*. +0-
#
. -Ǜ/-
).! - , or

..$")
.+-*1$
4/#$."- ( )/ǝ
)
Ǻ
..0-$)"$/4/#
//# +-*+*.
+0-
#
. -Ǜ/-
).! - , *-
..$") $.Ɵ)
)
$
''4

' *!+ -!*-($)"
1 '*+ -Ǩ.*
'$"
/$*).# - 0) -)*/2$/## '
4 1 '*+ -ǚ */2$/#./
)$)"
/# !*- "*$)"Ǜ/# $/4
)
" -Ǩ.
++-*1
'.#
'')*/
- ,0$- !*-
)

..$")( )//*
) )/$/4*- )/$/$ .
*)/-*''$)" 1 '*+ -Ǜ
*)/-*''
4
1 '*+ -Ǜ*-0) -
*((*)
*)/-*'2$/# 1 '*+ -Ǜ+-*1$ /#
/ 1 '*+ -
*2).
)
*)/-*'.)* ' ../#
)Ɵơ4+ -
)/ ǹǁƼʷǺ *!.0
#.0

..*- )/$/4 or

*)/-*'./#
4-to-
4(
)
" ( )/
$.$*).*!.0
#.0

..*- )/$/4ǚ
ƾƽǚǁ '
. 0+*)-
).! -ǚ+*)/# /-
).! -Ǜ.
' Ǜ*-
..$")( )/
*!
''*! 1 '*+ -Ǩ.-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,
)*
'$"
/$*).# - 0) -+0-.0
)//*

/$*)ƾƽǚƾ *!/#$."- ( )/Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''

0/*(
/$

''4 - '
. !-*(
/# *
'$"
/$*).0) -/#$."- ( )/Ǜ2$/#- .+
//*/# -*+ -/4/-
).! -- Ǜ
.*'Ǜ*-
..$") Ǜ
-$.$)".0
. ,0 )//*/#
/ *!$/4
)
" -
++-*1
'*!
.0
#/-
).! -Ǜ.
' Ǜ*-
..$")( )/ǝ+-*1$ Ǜ#*2 1 -Ǜ/#
/$!
)4/-
).! - Ǜ
+0-
#
. -Ǜ*-
..$")
++-*1
4/# $/4
)
" - 3+- ..'4
..0( .
''*!
/# -$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,
)*
'$"
/$*).*! 1 '*+ -0) -/#$."- ( )/Ǜ
1 '*+ -.#
''
- '
. 2$/#- .+
//*
''.0
#-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,
)

..0( *
'$"
/$*).ǚ
)
)4 1 )/Ǜ/# /-
).! - Ǜ+0-
#
. -Ǜ*-
..$") .#
''

.0
%
//*
''/# +-*1$.$*).# - *!
).#
''+-*1$
'')
..
-4
*
0( )/.Ǜ
-/$Ɵ

/$*).,
)*/# -)
..
-4$)!*-(
/$*)+-$*-/*$/4

)
" -
++-*1
'ǚ
ƾƽǚǂ 1 '*+ -Ǩ.$"#//* /
$)+
$Ɵ $"#/.*-
'$"
/$*).ǚ
1 '*+ -(
42$/##*'!-*(
.
' Ǜ/-
).! -*-
..$")( )/*!/#$."- ( )/
*-
)4+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4/-
).! -- Ǜ
-/
$)-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.
)ȍ*-
*
'$"
/$*).2#$
# 1 '*+ -2$.# ./*- /
$)Ǜ+-*1$ /#
/ 1 '*+ -.+
$Ɵ .
.0
#-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,
)ȍ*-*
'$"
/$*).$)
2-$// )*
0( )//*

++ )
/*/#$."- ( )/
)-
*- 2$/#/# '
(
*0)/4
*- -+-$*-/*/#
.
' Ǜ/-
).! -, *-
..$")( )/*!/# -*+ -/4ǚ 1 '*+ -Ǩ.+0-
#
. -Ǜ/-
).! - ,
*-
..$") .#
''/# )#
1 )*$)/ - ./*-*
'$"
/$*).!*-.0
#-$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,

)*
'$"
/$*).
)/#$."- ( )/.#
''- (
$)
++'$

' /* 1 '*+ -2$/#
- .+
//*.0
#- /
$) -$"#/.Ǜ$)/ - ./.,
)ȍ*-*
'$"
/$*).ǚ
ƾƽǚǃ
-/$
'..$")( )/ǚ
)/# 1 )/*!
+
-/$
'-
).! -Ǜ$/4
.#
''
**+ -
/ 2$/# 1 '*+ -
)
)4+-*+*. -
).! - /*
''*

/ -$"#/.

)*
'$"
/$*).0) -/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
)/# -*%
/++-*1
'.

(*)"/# - /
$) -*+ -/4
)/# /-
).! -- -*+ -/4ǚ -*1$ /#
/$/4
-
$1 .

*+4*!/#
..$")( )/
)
..0(+/$*)
"- ( )/
42#$
#
-
).! -
..0( ./# t-
).! -- -$"#/.
)*
'$"
/$*).
..*
$
/ 2$/#/#
622
ƾǂ
t-
).! -- -*+ -/4ǜǹ$Ǻ
)4.0
. ,0 )/
-

#2$/#- .+
//*/# t-
).! --
*
'$"
/$*)..#
'')*/
*)./$/0/

-

#2$/#- .+
//*/# - /
$) -$"#/.
)
*
'$"
/$*).*!.0
#t-
).! -*-ǹ*-
)4*/# --
).! - Ǻ0) -/# 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/Ǜ
) ǹ$$Ǻ
)4.0
. ,0 )/
-

#2$/#- .+
//*/# - /
$)
*
'$"
/$*).*!T-
).! -*-ǹ*-
)4*/# --
).! - Ǻ.#
'')*/
*)./$/0/

-

#
2$/#- .+
//*/# t-
).! -- -$"#/.
)*
'$"
/$*).*!
-
).! - 0) -/#
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ # T-
).! -*-
)/# -
).! -

#.#
''
.*' '4
- .+*).$
' !*-/# - +*-/$)"
)
))0
'- 1$ 2- ,0$- ( )/.- '
/$)"/*/#
+*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4*2)
4.0
#T-
).! -*-ȍ-
).! - ǚ )4
( )( )/
/*/# 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
/2 )$/4
)
T-
).! -*-*--
).! -
.#
''*)'4
Ƣ
//# +*-/$*)*!/# -*+ -/4*2)
4.0
#T-
).! -*-*-
-
).! - ǚ
ƾƾǚ Bankruptcyǚ # *
'$"
/$*).*!/#$."- ( )/.#
'')*/

$.
#
-"

' $)

)&-0+/
4ǚ
ƾƿǚ IndemniƟcationǚ 1 '*+ -
"- ./*$) ()$!4Ǜ ! ),
)#*'
#
-(' ../# $/4Ǜ
)$/. '
/
)
++*$)/
*0)
$'.Ǜ
*
-.Ǜ
*(($..$*).Ǜ
*ƣ
-.Ǜ
" )/.Ǜ (+'*4 .Ǜ
)- +- . )/
/$1 .!-*(
)4
)
''
'
$(.Ǜ
*./.
ǹ$)
'0$)"' "
'! .
)
*./.Ǻ
)'$

$'$/4!*-
)4+ -.*)
'$)%0-4*-+-*+ -/4

(
" 2#$
#(
4
-$. $-
/'4*-$)$-
/'4
.
- .0'/*!
)4

/$*).*-
$)

/$*).
4 1 '*+ -Ǜ*-
)4

/$*).*-$)

/$*).*! 1 '*+ -Ǩ.
*)/-

/*-.Ǜ
.0

*)/-

/*-.Ǜ
" )/.Ǜ*- (+'*4 .$)
*))
/$*)2$/#/#
*)./-0
/$*)Ǜ
$(+-*1 ( )/Ǜ*+ -
/$*)Ǜ*-(
$)/ )
)
*!/# -*%
/Ǜ+-*1$ /#
/ 1 '*+ -
.#
''#
1 )*$) ()$Ɵ

/$*)*
'$"
/$*)2$/#- .+
//*) "'$" )
*-2-*)"!0'

*)0
/*!/# $/4Ǜ$/.
*)/-

/*-.Ǜ.0

*)/-

/*-.Ǜ
" )/., *- (+'*4 ., *-2$/#
- .+
//*/# (
$)/ )
)
Ǜ0. *-
*)$/$*)*!
)4$(+-*1 ( )/
ơ -/# /$(
$/#
.
) $

/ /*
)

+/
4/# $/4*-
)*/# -+0
'$
)/$/4ǹ 3
+/

.+-*1$ $)
)$(+-*1 ( )/
"- ( )/*-(
$)/ )
)

*)Ǻǚ
!$/4$.
)
(
.
+
-/4/*
)4' "
'

/$*)Ǜ$/4.#
''
**+ -
/ 2$/# 1 '*+ -Ǜ.#
''

++
-$).0
#

/$*)Ǜ
).#
'')*/0)-
.*)

'42$/##*'
++-*1
'*!

. //' ( )/*/# -2$.

' /* 1 '*+ -ǚ
ƾǀǚ Insuranceǚ
ƾǀǚƽ *(( -
$
' ) -
'
$

$'$/4
).0-
)
ǚ 0-$)"/# -( of
/#$."- ( )/Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''(
$)/
$)$) Ƣ
/
+*'$
4*!
*(( -
$
'
" ) -
''$

$'$/4$).0-
)
2$/#
+ --*

0-- )

*(
$) .$)"' '$($/*!)*/
' ../#
)ʜƽǛƼƼƼǛƼƼƼǚ # +*'$
4.*(
$)/
$)
4 1 '*+ -.#
'')
( /# $/4

.
)
$/$*)
'$).0-
).#
''$)
'0 $/# -
. 1 -

$'$/4*!$)/ - ./
'

0.
*-
-*..-'$

$'$/4 )*-. ( )/ǚ $/4
) 1 '*+ -
"- /#
/.0
#$).0-
)

623
ƾǃ
(
4$)
'0
'/ -)
/$1 -$.&(
)
" ( )/+-*"-
(.Ǜ$)
'0$)". '!-$).0-
)
, or

*(
$)
/$*)*!. '!-$).0-
)

)$).0-
)
Ǜ+-*1$ /#
/.0
#
'/ -)
/$1
-$.&(
)
" ( )/+-*"-
(.+-*1$ +-*/
/$*) ,0$1
' )//*/#
/.+
$Ɵ
0) -/#$."- ( )/ǚ
ƾǀǚƾ *-& -.Ǩ *(+ ).
/$*)
).0-
)
ǚ0-$)"/# -(*!/#$.
"- ( )/, 1 '*+ -.#
''(
$)/
$)*-& -.Ǩ *(+ ).
/$*)$).0-
)
!*-
''
+ -.*). (+'*4
4 1 '*+ -!*-2*-&
//# -*%
/.$/ ǚ 1 '*+ -.#
''
- ,0$-

#
*)/-

/*-
).0

*)/-

/*-.$($'
-'4/*+-*1$ *-& -.Ǩ
*(+ ).
/$*)$).0-
)
!*-$/.- .+
/$1 (+'*4 .ǚ 1 '*+ -
"- ./*
$) ()$!4/# $/4!*-
)4
(
" - .0'/$)"!-*( 1 '*+ -Ǩ.!
$'0- /*
(
$)/
$)
)4.0
#$).0-
)
ǚ
ƾǀǚƿ 1$ )
*!
).0-
)
ǚ-$*-/*$..0
)
*!
)4+ -($/.!*-/#
-*%
/Ǜ$)
'0$)""-
$)"+ -($/.Ǜ 1 '*+ -.#
''!0-)$.#/# $/4.
/$.!

/*-4
1$ )
*!/# $).0-
)
- ,0$- $)
/$*).ƾǀǚƽ
)ƾǀǚƾ
) 1$ )
/#
/
/#

--$ -$.- ,0$- /*"$1 /# $/4
/'
./Ɵơ )ǹƽǁǺ

4.+-$*-2-$// )
)*/$
*!/#

)
''
/$*)*-- 0
/$*)$)
*1 -
" *!
+*'$
40)' ..- +'

2$/#.$($'
-
*1 -
" ǚ # $).0-
)
.#
'' 3/ )/*/# $/4Ǜ$/. '
/$1
)

++*$)/$1
*
-.Ǜ
*(($..$*).Ǜ*ƣ
-.Ǜ
" )/.Ǜ (+'*4 ., - +- . )/
/$1 .,

)/* 1 '*+ -+ -!*-($)"2*-&*)/# -*%
/ǚ
ƾǁǚ Sewer and aterǚ 1 '*+ -

&)*2' " ./#
/$/(0./*
/
$)
2 / -
). 2 -+ -($/.!-*(/# 0
'$)
)
(*) -1$
.$./-$
/
ǹ“DSRSD”Ǻ2#$
#$.
)*/# -+0
'$

" )
4)*/2$/#$)/#
*)/-*'*!/# $/4ǚ City

"- ./#
/$/.#
'')*//
&
)4

/$*)2$/#*++*.$)" 1 '*+ -Ǩ. Ƣ*-/.
/*- . -1 2
/ -
). 2 -

$/4.0ƣ
$ )//*. -1 /# -*%
/ .
-$

# - $)ǚ
ƾǂǚ Noticesǚ '')*/$
.- ,0$- *-+-*1$ !*-0) -/#$."- ( )/
.#
''
$)2-$/$)"ǚ */$
.- ,0$- /*
"$1 )/*/# $/4.#
''

- ..
.
!*''*2.ǜ
$/4
)
" -
City of Dublin
ƽƼƼ$1$
'
5 0
'$)ǛǅǀǁǂǄ
#*) *ǚǜǹǅƾǁǺǄƿƿ-ǂǂǁƼ

3*ǚ: ǹǅƾǁǺǄƿƿ-ǂǂǁƽ
$/#
*+$ ./*ǜ City Attorney
624
ƾǄ
*/$
.- ,0$- /*
"$1 )/* 1 '*+ -.#
''

- ..
.
!*''*2.ǜ

./Ǜ

$)"40)0)Ǜ#$ !( -$

.ƣ
-
ƾǄƼƼ*./
&'1ǚǛ0$/ ǁƽƽǁ
*0./*)ǛǃǃƼǁǂ
#*) *ǚǜǹǄƿƾ) ǃǄǃ-Ƽǂƾǃ
(
$'ǜ'.0)ț"#
-"-*0+ǚ
*(

-/4(
4
#
)"
- ..
4"$1$)")*/$
$)2-$/$)"/*/# */# -
-/4

)/# -
ơ -
'')*/$
..#
''

- ..
)/-
).($// /*/# ) 2
- ..ǚ
*/$
..#
''
( "$1 )
)-
$1 0+*)+ -.*)
' '$1 -4Ǜ*-$!(
$' Ǜ
0+*)/# 3+$-
/$*) of forty- $"#/ǹǀǄ) #*0-.
ơ -
$)" +*.$/ $)/# )$/
/
/ .
$'ǚ */$
.(
4
'.*
"$1 )
4*1 -)$"#/
*0-$ -Ǜ2#$
#.#
''

( "$1 )/# !*''*2$)"
4*-
4!

.$($' /-
).($..$*)*- (
$'Ǜ2#$
#
.#
''
( "$1 )0+*)1 -$Ɵ

/$*)*!-
$+/ǚ
ƾǃǚ Agreement is Entire Understandingǚ #$."- ( )/Ǜ$) '0$)"$/.
3#$
$/.Ǜ
*)./$/0/ ./# )/$- 0) -./
)$)"
)
"- ( )/*!/#
-/$ .
)
.0+ -. .
'') "*/$
/$*).*-+- 1$*0.
"- ( )/.
/2 )/#
-/$ .2$/#
- .+
//*
''*-
)4+
-/*!/# .0
%
/(
// -# - *!ǚ
ƾǄǚ Exhibitsǚ # !*''*2$)"*
0( )/ $.- ! -- /*$)/#$."- ( )/

)$.
//

# # - /*
)$)
*-+*-
/ # - $)
./#*0"#. /!*-/#$)!0''ǜ
3#$
$/
"
' .
-$+/$*)*!-*+ -/4
ƾǅǚ Recitalsǚ # !*- "*$)"
$/
'.
- /-0
)
*--
/
)
- (

+
-/# - *!ǚ
ƿƼǚ Counterpartsǚ #$."- ( )/(
4
3
0/
4

#
-/4*)

. +
-
/ .$")
/0- +
" Ǜ
)2# )/# 3
0/ .$")
/0- +
" .
-
*(
$) Ǜ
.#
''
*)./$/0/ *) .$)"' $)./-0( )/ǚ#$."- ( )/$. 3
0/ $)/2*ǹƾǺ
0+'$

/ *-$"$)
'.Ǜ

#*!2#$
#$. ( /*

)*-$"$)
'ǚ
ƿƽǚ Recordationǚ # $/4.#
''-
*-

*+4*!/#$."- ( )/2$/#$)
ten ǹƽƼǺ

4.!*''*2$)" 3
0/$*)
4
''
-/$ .ǚ# -
ơ -Ǜ$!/#$."- ( )/$.
625
ƾǅ
/ -($)
/ Ǜ(*$Ɵ , *-
( ) Ǜ/# $/4' -&.#
''-
*-)*/$
*!.0
#

/$*)2$/#/# '
(
*0)/4
*- -ǚ
ƿƾǚ No Third-Party BeneƟciariesǚ */#$)"
*)/
$) $)/#$."- ( )/
$.$)/ ) /**-.#
''
( /*
*)! -0+*)
)4+ -.*)Ǜ*/# -/#
)/#

-/$ .
)/# $-- .+
/$1 + -($// .0

..*-.
)
..$").Ǜ
)4-$"#/., or
- ( $ .# - 0) -ǚ
ƿƿǚ Applicable Lawǚ #$."- ( )/.#
''

*)./-0
) )!*-

$)

*-
)
2$/#/# '

2.*!/# /
/ *!
'$!*-)$
ǚ
ƿǀǚ Time is of the Essenceǚ $( $.*!/# .. )
!*-

#+-*1$.$*)*!
/#$."- ( )/!*-2#$
#/$( $.
) ' ( )/ǚ
ƿǁǚ Further Actions and Instrumentsǚ

#
-/4/*/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/.#
''
**+ -
/ 2$/#
)+-*1$ -
.*)

'
..$./
)
/*/# */# -

-/4
)/
&
''

/$*).)
..
-4/* ).0- /#
//#
-/$ .-
$1 /#

) Ɵ/.*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/Ǜ.0
%
//*.
/$.!

/$*)*!/#
*)$/$*).
*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ+*)/# - ,0 ./*!
)4
-/4Ǜ/# */# -
-/4
.#
''+-*(+/'4 3
0/ Ǜ2$/#

&)*2' "( )/*-
ƣ
1$/$!-
.*)

'4- ,0$- Ǜ

)Ɵ' *--
*-.0
#- ,0$- $)./-0( )/.
)2-$/$)".
)/
&
)4

/$*).

.(
4
-
.*)

'4)
..
-40) -/# / -(.*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )//*

--4*0//# $)/ )/
)/*!0'Ɵ''/# +-*1$.$*).*!/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/*-/* 1$ )
*-
*).0((
/ /# /-
).

/$*).

*)/ (+'
/
4/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ
ƿǂǚ Section eadingsǚ
/$*)#
$)".$)/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/
- !*-
*)1 )$ )
*)'4
)
- )*/$)/ ) /*
0. $)
$)/ -+- /$)"*-
*)./-0$)"/# / -(.Ǜ
*1 )
)/.Ǜ *-
*)$/$*).*!/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/ǚ
ƿǃǚ Construction of Agreementǚ #$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/# .

)- 1$ 2
)- 1$.
4' "
'
*0). '!*-
*/# 1 '*+ -
)$/4Ǜ
))*
+- .0(+/$*)*--0' /#
/
(
$"0$/$ ..#
''

*)./-0
"
$).//# -
ơ$)"

-/4.#
''
++'4/*/# $)/ -+- /
/$*)*- )!*-
( )/*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/ǚ
ƿǄǚ Authorityǚ # + -.*)..$")$)"
'*2- +- . )/
)2
--
)//#
/
/# 4#
1 /#
0/#*-$/4/*
$)/# $-- .+
/$1
-/4
)/#
/
'')
..
-4
626
ƿƼ

*
-*!$-
/*-.ǨǛ.#
- #*' -.ǨǛ+
-/) -.ǨǛ
$/4
*0)
$'.ǨǛ*-*/# -
++-*1
'.
#
1
)*
/
$) ǚ
ƿǅǚ Non-Intended Prevailing age Re,uirementsǚ 3
+/!*-+0
'$

$(+-*1 ( )/.
*)./-0
/
4/# 1 '*+ -
)/*
$

/ /*/# $/4
ǹ2#$
#
- .0
%
//*
*)$/$*).*!-*%
/++-*1
'ǺǛ)*/#$)"$)/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/.#
''$)
)42
4- ,0$- Ǜ*-

*)./-0 /*- ,0$- Ǜ
1 '*+ -/*+
4+- 1
$'$)"2
" .2$/#- .+
//*
)42*-&*!
*)./-0
/$*)*-
$(+-*1 ( )/2$/#$)/# -*%
/ǹ
“Non-Intended Prevailing Wage
Requirement”Ǻǚ0/!*-/# 0) -./
)$)"*!/#
-/$ .
.- Ơ
/ $)/#
$(( $
/ '4+-
$)". )/ )
Ǜ/#
-/$ .2*0')*/#
1 )/ - $)/*/#$.
1 '*+( )/"- ( )/

. 0+*)/# / -(.
)
*)$/$*).. /!*-/## - $)ǚ
1 '*+ -
)$/4#
1 (
1 -4 Ƣ*-/$)-

#$)"/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )//* ).0- /#
/$/./ -(.
)
*)$/$*).2$'')*/- .0'/$)
*)-

)/ ) - 1
$'$)"
" ,0$- ( )/ǚ# . Ƣ*-/.#
1
)
*)0
/ $)
/#

. )
*!
)4
++'$

' 3$./$)"%0$
$
'$)/ -+- /
/$*)*!/# -
)/

( )( )/./*/#
'$!*-)$
+- 1
$'$)"2
" '
2ǚ
!Ǜ .+$/ .0
# Ƣ*-/.Ǜ
)4
+-*1$.$*)*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/.#
''
/ -($)
4
)4
*0-/*!

*(+ / )/%0-$.$
/$*)/*- .0'/$)
*)-
)/ ) - 1
$'$)"
"
,0$- ( )/Ǜ.0
# / -($)
/$*).#
'')*/$)1
'$
/ *-- ) -0) )!*-

)4+-*1$.$*)# - *!ǝ+-*1$ Ǜ#*2 1 -Ǜ/#
//#
-/$ .# -
4
"- /#
/Ǜ$)
.0
# 1 )/Ǜ/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/.#
''
- !*-( .0
#/#
/

#
pr*1$.$*)*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )//#
/- .0'/.$)/# *)-
)/ )
- 1
$'$)"
" ,0$- ( )/2$''
- (*1 !-*(/#$. 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/
./#*0"#.0
#+-*1$.$*).2 - ) 1 -
+
-/*!/# 1 '*+( )/
"- ( )/Ǜ
)Ǜ$)'$ 0*!.0
#+-*1$.$*)ǹ.ǺǛ- +'

( )/+-*1$.$*)..#
''

.
+
-/*!/#$. 1 '*+( )/"- ( )/
..$($'
-$)/ -(./*.0
#
- (*1 +-*1$.$*)ǹ.Ǻ
.(
4
+*..$
'
)' "
'Ǜ1
'$
) )!*-

' , but
2$/#*0/- .0'/$)"$)/# *)-
)/ ) - 1
$'$)"
" ,0$- ( )/ǚ

Ǜ/#
-/$ .# - /*#
1

0. /#$."- ( )//*

3
0/
.*!/#
/
)4
-Ɵ-./

*1 2-$// )ǚ
627
628

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the City of Dublin , County of Alameda, State of California, described as follows:

PARCEL A:

PARCEL ONE:

BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1, EAST MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERN LINE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY FROM DUBLIN TO LIVERMORE AS SAID LINE IS DEFINED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED FROM ALICE M.

SHORT AND BEATRICE B. BRIGHT, TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED MARCH 13, 1934, IN BOOK 3008 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY AT PAGE 324, WITH THE EASTERN LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 6152, AS SAID COUNTY ROAD IS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED FROM HENRIETTA FARRELLY TO COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, RECORDED JANUARY 2, 1918, IN BOOK 2612, OF DEEDS, AT PAGE 352, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 89° 30' EAST ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY 814.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 31' WEST 2855.00 FEET TO THE NORTH BOUNDARY LINE OF TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG THE LAST NAMED LINE 435.70 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO. 6152; THENCE ALONG THE LAST NAMED LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES; SOUTH 36° 35' WEST 23.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23° 20' WEST 901.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 31' EAST 2001.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

ALSO BEING A PORTION OF THE SANTA RITA RANCHO.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1950, BOOK 6021, PAGE 575, SERIES NO. AE-13413.

ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 24, 1968, BOOK 2279, PAGE 110, SERIES NO. BA-117504.

PARCEL TWO:

A PORTION OF THE PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED NO. 6832 RECORDED FEBRUARY 15, 1950, IN BOOK 6021, PAGE 575, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF CROAK ROAD (ALSO KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD NO. 6152) AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE GENERAL NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS SOUTH 0°21'44" WEST, ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 44°54'24", AN ARC LENGTH OF 39.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°33'15" WEST, 9.88 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°59'16" WEST, 4.70 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CROAK ROAD; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID LINE NORTH 0°21'44" EAST,

35.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.

PARCEL THREE:

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID STATE DEED NO. 32178 (REEL 2001 OR IMAGE 911), DISTANT THEREON S. 0°21'44" W., 159.94 FEET FROM THE F
([KLELW$
629
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LAST SAID PARCEL; THENCE FROM A TANGENT THAT BEARS S. 31°56'43" W., ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 270.00 FEET, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 56°35'28", AN ARC LENGTH OF 266.68 FEET; THENCE S. 89°59'16" E., 221.42 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID STATE DEED NO. 6833 (VOLUME 6402 OR PAGE 393); THENCE ALONG LAST SAID LINE AND ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCELS DESCRIBED IN SAID STATE DEED NO. 32177 (REEL 1995 OR IMAGE 343) AND SAID STATE DEED NO. 32178 (REEL 2001 OR IMAGE 911) N. 0°21'44" E., 127.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.

PARCEL B:

A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE INDENTURE FROM SAMUEL B. MARTIN TO OWEN P. SUTTON, RECORDED JUNE 7, 1862, IN BOOK M OF DEEDS AT PAGE 266, BEING A PORTION OF THE SANTA RITA RANCHO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINES OF FALLON ROAD, A COUNTY ROAD WITH A WIDTH OF 60 FEET AS SAID ROAD IS DESCRIBED IN THE INDENTURE TO THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, RECORDED JULY 31, 1941, IN BOOK 4115 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS PAGE 57, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN AFORESAID INDENTURE FROM SAMUEL B.

MARTIN TO OWEN P. SUTTON; SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING LOCATED ON THE ARC OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 430.00 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 63° 55' 40" WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, SOUTH 89° 18' 00" EAST, 2,543.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY PROJECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 6152, KNOWN AS CROAK ROAD AND DESCRIBED IN THE INDENTURE TO THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, RECORDED JANUARY 2, 1918 IN BOOK 2612 OF DEEDS AT PAGE 352; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND PROJECTION THEREOF, SOUTH 0° 19' 30" EAST, 2274.37 FEET TO THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JUNE 4, 1956 IN BOOK 8048 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 339; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89° 20' 00" WEST, 200.40 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID UNION OIL COMPANY PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 0° 25' 00" EAST, 242.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF STATE FREEWAY 580, AS DESCRIBED IN THE INDENTURE TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 7, 1967 ON REEL 1995 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT IMAGE 347, SAID POINT BEING LOCATED ON THE ARC OF A CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 222.02 FEET, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 8° 11' 49" WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF STATE FREEWAY 580 AS FOLLOWS: WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8° 51' 49" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.35 FEET: THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 89° 20' 00" WEST, 302.60 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 4972.48 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3° 33' 15" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 308.45; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 85° 46' 45" WEST, 556.93 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 972.09 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45° 00' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 763.48 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 40° 46' 45" WEST 369.85 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 278.03 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47° 30' 55" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 230.57 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 37' 40" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 46.93 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, NORTH 1° 20' 00" EAST, 92.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 40' 00" WEST, 12.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF AFORESAID FALLON ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF FALLON ROAD AS FOLLOWS: NORTH 1° 20' 00" EAST, 1457.58 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 430.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGEL OF 27° 24' 20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 205.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

PARCEL C:

A PORTION OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED NO. 32178 (AZ69610) TO STATE OF 630
CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 18, 1967, IN REEL 2001, IMAGE 911, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL, DISTANT THEREON NORTH 83º 33' 16" WEST, 8.01 FEET FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE GENERAL NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN AS PARCEL 11 OF THAT CERTAIN SET OF MAPS OF 20 SHEETS ENTITLED "RELINQUISHMENT IN THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA", RECORDED JUNE 19, 1973, IN REEL 3444, IMAGE 722 TO 761, INCLUSIVE, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, SOUTH 0º 21' 44" WEST, 18.69 FEET AND ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 222.00 FEET THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 82º 13' 05", AN ARC LENGTH OF 318.57 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF FIRST SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID LINE NORTH 0º 21' 44" EAST, 242.28 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF FIRST SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG LAST SAID LINE SOUTH 88º 33' 16" EAST 191.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT.

APN: 905-0001-006-03 (Parcel One of Parcel A), 985-0027-005 (Parcel Two of Parcel A), 985-0027-002 (Parcel B) and 985-0027-004 (Parcel C)
631
632
April 3, 2024
DUBLIN FALLON 580

PROJECT

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION

ANALYSIS
Dublin, CA
Attachment 9
633
Inside front cover
Page Intentionally blank
634
Dublin Fallon 580 Project Local
Transportation Analysis (LTA)
Dublin, CA
Prepared for:
,
Prepared by:

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
155 Grand Avenue, Suite 505
Oakland, CA 94612
510.839.1742
Project Manager:

Aaron Elias
Associate Engineer
Project Principal:

Damian Stefanakis
Senior Principal Planner
Project Number 29998
April 3, 2024
635
Page Intentionally blank
636

CONTENTS

1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ...........................................................................................................................1

2. System Overview...............................................................................................................................3 Roadway Network.............................................................................................................................3 Transit Facilities..................................................................................................................................4 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities ......................................................................................................5

3. Traffic Operations Analysis ...........................................................................................................8 Study Location & Data Collection ..............................................................................................8 Analysis Methodologies & Level of Service Standards ......................................................9 Intersection Operations ..................................................................................................................9 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 11 Near-Term Conditions ................................................................................................................. 12 Near-Term Plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................ 13 Cumulative Conditions................................................................................................................. 16 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions........................................................................................ 20 95th Percentile Queue................................................................................................................... 24 CMP Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 38 Parking Assessment........................................................................................................................... 43

4. Discussion of Effects & Recommended Improvements................................................. 45 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard ............................................................................................. 45 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway.................................................................................................. 46 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access .............................................................................. 46 Dublin Boulevard & Croak Road.............................................................................................. 47 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps............................................................................................... 48 95th Percentile Queue Reduction Recommendations...................................................... 48 637
Local Transportation Analysis
April 3, 2024 List of Tables
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: ITE Trip Generation Estimate for the Project............................................................................................................1 Table 2. Existing Transit Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................5 Table 3. General Level of Service Definitions ............................................................................................................................9 Table 4 Existing Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours.............................................................. 11 Table 5 Near-Term Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours ....................................................... 12 Table 6: Near-Term Operations AM Peak Hour with and without the Project ......................................................... 14 Table 7: Near-Term Operations PM Peak Hour with and without the Project.......................................................... 15 Table 8 Cumulative Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours ...................................................... 19 Table 9: Cumulative Operations AM Peak Hour with and without the Project ........................................................ 22 Table 10: Cumulative Operations PM Peak Hour with and without the Project ...................................................... 23 Table 11: AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue in Feet ................................................................................................... 26 Table 12: PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue in Feet.................................................................................................... 32 Table 13: Analysis of CMP Segments for Existing Conditions ......................................................................................... 39 Table 14: Analysis of CMP Segments for 2040 Conditions ............................................................................................... 40 Table 15: Municipal Code Required Vs. Site Plan Provided Residential Parking...................................................... 43 Table 16: ITE Parking Generation Vs. Provides and Municipal Code Requirements............................................... 43 638
Local Transportation Analysis
April 3, 2024 List of Tables
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. iii
Page intentionally blank.
639
Section 1 Introduction
640
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the findings of the local transportation assessment (LTA) conducted for the proposed development of the property owned by GH PacVest and known as the Dublin Fallon 580 project (Project), located east of Fallon Road and south of Central Parkway in Dublin, CA.

Project Description
The Project is proposing to develop property that is located east of Fallon Road and south of Central Parkway in Dublin, CA. The applicant for the Project identified the proposed project as a mix of residential, industrial, and commercial uses. The identified uses include:
• 238 Multifamily Residential Dwelling Units
• 2,888,400 Square Feet of Advanced Manufacturing
• 314 Hotel Rooms
• 100,000 Square Feet of Retail
• 100,000 Square Feet of Office
The resulting trip generation per the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation manual for the daily, AM peak hour, and the PM peak hour is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: ITE Trip Generation Estimate for the Project
Description Size Units ITE Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Multi-Family 238 du 220 1,604 23 73 96 77 45 122
Advanced Manufacturing 2,888.4 ksf 140 13,720 1,493 472 1,965 663 1,475 2,138 Hotel 314 Rooms 310 2,509 81 64 145 95 91 186
Retail 100 ksf 820 3,701 52 32 84 163 177 340
Office 100 ksf 710 1,084 134 18 152 24 120 144
Total 22,618 1,783 659 2,442 1,022 1,908 2,930
641
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 2
Section 2
System Overview
642
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 3

2. SYSTEM OVERVIEW
The following section describes the existing conditions of the study area, including roadway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian networks.

Roadway Network
Freeways
Interstate 580 (I-580) is a generally east-west freeway that runs south of the project site. I-580 connects the San Francisco Bay Area to the west and the City of Livermore to the east. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the project is 65 miles per hour (mph). Express lanes are present in both directions and are in effect Monday through Friday from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Arterials/Collectors/Local Roadways
Dublin Boulevard is a six-lane divided east-west roadway that extends west of the project site. Dublin Boulevard is classified in the City’s General Plan1 as an arterial between its western limits and Tassajara Road and classified as a collector between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road (as well as the proposed extension to North Canyons Parkway). On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway and the posted speed limit is 45 mph in the vicinity of the project. Dublin Boulevard is proposed to be extended connecting from its current terminus at Fallon Road to North Canyons Parkway in Livermore.

Central Parkway is a two-lane divided east-west roadway that extends west from Croak Road west of the project to Sterling. The roadway generally runs through residential land uses and provides access to Cottonwood Creek K-8 School near the project. Central Parkway is classified as an arterial between Tassajara Road and Fallon Road and as a collector for its remaining extent. On-street parking is permitted east of Sunset View Drive near the project and in other segments abutting residential land uses. The posted speed limit is 25 mph in vicinity of the project. Central Parkway would be extended with the Francis Ranch (East Ranch) project with the proposed Project widening to the ultimate configuration.

Croak Road is a north-south roadway that is currently not accessible to the public near the project site.

Croak Road connects to Fallon Road near I-580, Central Parkway at its eastern terminus, and Terracina Drive. The roadway is classified as a local residential roadway between Central Parkway and Positano Parkway. Once the Dublin Boulevard extension is constructed, Croak Road will connect Dublin Boulevard and Central Parkway. In the interim, Francis Ranch (East Ranch) will construct part of Croak Road as a two lane roadway near Central Parkway.

Fallon Road/El Charro Road is a north-south divided roadway that widens from four lanes south of Central Parkway to six lanes to the north; south of I-580, Fallon Road becomes El Charro Road within the City of Pleasanton. Fallon Road is classified as an arterial roadway near the project site. The roadway primarily serves residential land uses within the City of Dublin, with some retail located near I-580. On1 The City of Dublin General Plan. Chapter 5: Land Use and Circulation – Circulation and Scenic Highways Element. Amended 2022. https://www.dublin.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7799/Chapter-5-May2020?bidId= 643
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 4
street parking is not permitted along this roadway. The posted speed limit is 45 mph in the vicinity of the project.

Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard is an east-west roadway located south of I-580; the roadway is Stoneridge Drive within the City of Pleasanton and Jack London Boulevard within the City of Livermore.

Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard is classified as an arterial between Foothill Road and its eastern limits. On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway. Class II bicycle lanes are present along much of its length. The posted speed limit is 40 mph in the City of Pleasanton (Stoneridge Drive) and increases to 45 mph in the City of Livermore (Jack London Boulevard). Stoneridge Drive is a 4 to 6-lane roadway; Jack London Boulevard varies from 2 to 6 lanes.

Tassajara Road is a major north-south roadway in Dublin that connects to Fallon Road/Camino Tassajara to the north and the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County to the south. Tassajara Road is classified as an arterial roadway within the City of Dublin; south of I-580 within the City of Pleasanton, the roadway becomes Santa Rita Road. The roadway varies from two lanes to five lanes and is divided along its southern portion, between Stoneridge Drive and Dublin Ranch Drive. On-street parking is not permitted along this roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph within the study area. Class II bicycle lanes are present, except for on the overpass over I-580.

Hacienda Drive is a north-south roadway that provides access to office, residential, and retail land uses such as Hacienda Crossings and Persimmon Place. Hacienda Drive is classified as an arterial and ranges from 3 lanes to 6 lanes. On-street parking is not permitted. The posted speed limit is 35 mph within the study area.

North Canyons Parkway is an east-west arterial roadway that will connect to the planned Dublin Boulevard extension at its present western terminus at Doolan Road. The roadway merges with Portola Avenue at Collier Canyon Road. It is a four-lane, divided road with a posted speed limit of 40 mph near the study area. On-street parking is generally prohibited, and a bicycle lane is present on both sides of the road. North Canyons Parkway provides access to commercial and office land uses east of the project site, including several hotels and a Costco Wholesale warehouse.

Airway Boulevard is a north-south roadway in Livermore that provides access to I-580 and the Livermore Municipal Airport and connects to North Canyons Parkway at its northern terminus. It is classified as an arterial roadway and is a divided six-lane road north of Kitty Hawk Rd/I-580 EB off-ramp. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Class II bicycle lanes are present, except for on the overpass over I-580.

Transit Facilities
The Project area is served by Tri-Valley Wheels, which provides fixed-route bus service operated by the Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) to Dublin, Livermore, Pleasanton, and neighboring communities. Wheels also offers a Dial-A-Ride Paratransit service to eligible patrons in Dublin, available wherever fixed-route service is operating. Three routes directly serve the area surrounding the Project – Route 2, Route 30R (Rapid), and Route 501 (School Route). Currently, Route 30R follows Dublin Boulevard to Fallon Road, where it detours to I-580 before connecting to North Canyons Parkway. With the 644
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 5
extension of Dublin Boulevard, this route is likely to use the extension and directly serve the nonresidential portions of the Project which have access via Dublin Boulevard.

The area is also served by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), with the nearest station being Dublin/Pleasanton which is located approximately four miles west of the site.

Table 2 provides details about the bus service that serves the Project area, and Table 2. Existing Transit Facilities
Route
Route
Type
Major Destinations Day Times Frequency
2 Fixed
Route
E. Dublin/Pleasanton BART, Dublin Ranch,
Emerald Glen Park, Fallon Middle School Weekdays One AM trip, one PM trip 2 per day
30R
Rapid
Route
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, East
Ave., Livermore Transit Center, Portola Park, and
Ride, Las Positas College, N. Canyons, Dublin
Blvd, E. Dublin BART, Dublin Civic Center, W.

Dublin BART
Weekdays 5:00 AM to
11:00 PM
Every 30 minutes
Weekends 5:00 AM to
11:00 PM
Hourly
501
(A, B, C)
School
Route
Positano, Fallon Road, Silvera Ranch, Tassajara
Road, Central Pwky., Dublin HS Weekdays
One AM trip,
one PM trip for
each route
2 per day
Source: wheeelsbus.com
Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities
Dublin’s existing bikeway system consists of the following bikeway types, as defined in the City of Dublin’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2023).
◼ Class I Multi-Use Paths provide a separate facility designed for the exclusive use of bicycles, pedestrians, and other non-motorized uses with minimal vehicle crossflows. o Class IA Paths exist along a separate alignment.
o Class IB Sidepaths double as sidewalks along the side of the roadway. ◼ Class II Bicycle Lanes are on-street bikeways that provide a dedicated space for exclusive or semiexclusive bicycle use. o Class IIA Lanes are conventional one-way striped bike lanes. o Class IIB Lanes are upgraded bike lanes with striped buffers or green conflict markings. ◼ Class III Bicycle Routes do not provide a dedicated space for bicycles but instead, bikes share the lane with motorists and signs, or pavement markings indicate the bike route. o Class IIIA Routes are signage-only routes.
o Class IIIB Routes have wide curb lanes or shoulders.
o Class IIIC Routes are routes with standard shared-lane markings (“sharrows”). ◼ Class IV Separated Bicycle Lanes are bicycle lanes that provide vertical separation (e.g. grade separation, flexible posts, planters, on-street parking, etc.) from motorists on roadways. 645
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 6
Existing bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project include:
◼ Fallon Road has Class II facilities north of Dublin Boulevard, as well as Class IB sidepaths on the west side, north of Gleason Drive.
◼ Dublin Boulevard generally has Class II facilities west of Fallon Road. ◼ Central Parkway generally has Class II facilities east and west of Fallon Road. However, there is a Class III facility on Central Parkway eastbound between Fallon Road and Sunset View Drive. Central Parkway east of Fallon Road also has Class IB sidepaths. ◼ Stoneridge Drive/Jack London Boulevard has Class II facilities east and west of El Charro Road. ◼ Airway Boulevard has Class II bicycle facilities south of N. Canyons Parkway. ◼ N. Canyons Parkway has Class II facilities east of Airway Boulevard 646
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 7
Section 3
Traffic Operations Analysis
647
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 8

3. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
Study Location & Data Collection
Based on consultation with relevant agency staff, seventeen (17) existing intersections near the study location were identified as study locations. An additional five (5) intersections are included to account for two future intersections (identified with a “*” below) and three project driveways (identified with an “**” below). This results in a total of twenty-two (22) intersections which include:

1. Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard

2. Tassajara Road & Central Parkway

3. Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard

4. Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps

5. Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr

6. Tassajara Road & Fallon Road

7. Fallon Road & Positano Parkway

8. Fallon Road & Central Parkway

9. Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard

10. Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway

11. Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps

12. El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps

13. El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard

14. Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive

15. Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road

16. Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway

17. Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps

18. Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway**

19. Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7)**

20. Croak Road & Central Parkway*

21. Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8)**

22. Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard*
Data at the 17 intersections that exist today were collected on January 18, 2024 which was a typical midweek day with good weather when schools were in session. Appendix A contains the raw count data from this data collection effort. In addition to intersection counts, signal timing plans were requested for each study intersection that is signalized from the jurisdiction that owns the signal which included the city of Dublin, city of Pleasanton, and Caltrans.
648
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 9
Analysis Methodologies & Level of Service Standards
Traffic operations were evaluated for the twenty-two study intersections using level of service (LOS) which describes the operating conditions experienced by users of a facility. LOS is a qualitative measure of the effect of a few factors, including speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, driving comfort, and convenience. Levels of service are designated “A” through “F” from best to worst, which cover the entire range of traffic operations that might occur. LOS “A” through “E” generally represent traffic volumes at less than roadway capacity, while LOS “F” represents locations over capacity and/or experiencing significant delays. These conditions are generally described in Table 3.

Table 3. General Level of Service Definitions
LOS Description of Traffic Conditions
Average Delay per Vehicle (Seconds)
Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection
A
LOS A represents free-flow travel with excellent levels of comfort and convenience and the freedom to maneuver. ≤10.0 ≤10.0 B
LOS B has stable operating conditions, but the presence of other road users causes a noticeable, though slight, reduction in comfort,
convenience, and maneuvering freedom.
>10.0 and ≤20.0 >10.0 and ≤15.0
C
LOS C has stable operating conditions, but the operation of individual users is substantially affected by the interaction with others in the traffic stream.
>20.0 and ≤35.0 >15.0 and ≤25.0
D
LOS D represents high-density, but stable flow. Users
experience severe restriction in speed and freedom to
maneuver, with poor levels of comfort and convenience.
>35.0 and ≤55.0 >25.0 and ≤35.0
E
LOS E represents operating conditions at or near capacity.

Speeds are reduced to a low but relatively uniform value.

Freedom to maneuver is difficult with users experiencing frustration and poor comfort and convenience. Unstable
operation is frequent, and minor disturbances in traffic flow can cause breakdown conditions.
>55.0 and ≤80.0 >35.0 and ≤50.0
F
LOS F is used to define forced or breakdown conditions. This condition exists wherever the volume of traffic exceeds the capacity of the roadway. Long queues can form behind these bottleneck points with queued traffic traveling in a stop-andgo fashion. >80.0 >50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual
Intersection Operations
To ascertain the existing traffic conditions, traffic operations were evaluated at the twenty-two study intersections. Level of service (LOS) was determined for each intersection for the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions (2024 conditions without the project) • Near-Term No Project (Estimate of conditions in 2028 without the Project) • Near-Term Plus Project (Conditions in 2028 plus just the residential portion of the Project) • Cumulative (2040) No Project (Based on the City of Dublin travel demand model) • Cumulative (2040) Plus Project (2040 conditions plus full buildout of the Project) 649
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 10
Intersection operations were evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodologies as implemented by the Vistro software program. The HCM 7th Edition procedure calculates a weighted average stop delay in seconds per vehicle at an intersection and assigns a level of service designation based on the delay. Based on the City of Dublin’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (July 2021), the following criteria were used to determine whether the Project resulted in a significant effect on the local transportation system.

Signalized Intersections:
 At a study, signalized intersection which is located outside the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area, the project would cause the motor vehicle LOS to degrade to worse than LOS D (i.e., LOS E or F);
 At a study, signalized intersection which is located within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area, the project would cause the motor vehicle (LOS to degrade to worse than LOS E (i.e., LOS F);  At a study, signalized intersection which is located outside the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area where the motor vehicle level of service is LOS E, the project would cause the total intersection average vehicle delay to increase by six (6) seconds or more; or  At a study, signalized intersection for all areas where the level of service is LOS F, the project would cause: (a) the overall volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio to increase 0.03 or more; or (b) the critical movement V/C ratio to increase by 0.05 or more.  For intersections located along routes of regional significance, the Tri-Valley Transportation Plan and Action Plan identifies LOS E or better as the standard for the Multimodal Transportation Service Objective (MTSO) related to intersection LOS. Routes of regional significance in the study area include:
o Dublin Boulevard
o Tassajara Road
o Fallon Road
o North Canyons Parkway
o Jack London Boulevard
Unsignalized Intersections
 At a study, unsignalized intersection which is located outside the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area, the project would cause the motor vehicle LOS to degrade to worse than LOS D (i.e., LOS E or F) and after project completion satisfy the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) peak hour traffic signal warrant;
 At a study, unsignalized intersection which is located within the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan area, the project would cause the motor vehicle LOS to degrade to worse than LOS E (i.e., LOS F) and after project completion satisfy the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) peak hour traffic signal warrant; or
 At a study, unsignalized intersection where the motor vehicle level of service is operating below the LOS threshold, the project would add ten (10) or more vehicles to the critical movement and after project completion satisfy the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) peak hour traffic signal warrant.
650
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 11
Existing Conditions
Based on the existing intersection count data, intersection geometry (Appendix B), and signal timing sheets, the existing traffic operations at the study intersections for the AM and PM peak hours were calculated and reported in Table 4. Appendix C contains the detailed output sheets from the analysis software documenting these findings. As shown, all intersections operate at LOS D or better.

Table 4 Existing Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours # Intersection
Existing AM Existing PM
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.35 43.5 D 0.40 38.7 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.58 28.1 C 0.48 27.9 C 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.48 31.8 C 0.67 37.0 D 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.59 13.2 B 0.63 11.1 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.73 31.4 C 0.81 33.2 C 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.64 21.9 C 0.39 15.2 B
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 0.78 22.1 C 0.50 9.3 A 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.57 31.9 C 0.36 20.9 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.53 20.1 C 0.48 21.4 C 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.53 13.3 B 0.59 13.0 B 11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.77 8.2 A 0.54 17.1 B
12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.39 6.8 A 0.54 6.9 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.29 10.5 B 0.69 11.3 B 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.76 31.0 C 0.26 11.1 B 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.36 11.0 B 0.15 8.0 A 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.27 13.7 B 0.46 16.4 B 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.22 9.8 A 0.21 10.1 B 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A N/A 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A N/A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway N/A N/A
21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A N/A
22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard N/A N/A
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
651
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 12
Near-Term Conditions
Near-term conditions represent background traffic growth to the year 2028. These volumes were derived based on an interpolation of the city of Dublin’s travel demand model outputs for the years 2020 and 2040. The transportation network and signal timing were kept the same as existing conditions. The resulting intersection operations are shown in Table 5. All study intersections were found to operate at LOS D or better. Near-term lane configurations and traffic volumes are provided in Appendix D. Appendix E provides the detailed output sheets for near-term conditions.

Table 5 Near-Term Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours # Intersection
Near-Term AM Near-Term PM
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.39 41.8 D 0.47 39.7 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.59 28.3 C 0.55 32.0 C 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.60 39.5 D 0.84 51.5 D 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.63 13.4 B 0.67 11.5 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.75 32.5 C 0.85 35.0 D 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.67 22.8 C 0.43 15.6 B
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 0.86 31.3 C 0.56 10.7 B 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.57 32.1 C 0.40 21.2 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.55 23.2 C 0.68 34.2 C 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.53 13.1 B 0.63 13.4 B 11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.75 8.7 A 0.59 24.5 C
12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.43 6.8 A 0.60 7.2 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.42 13.8 B 0.72 13.9 B 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.76 31.6 C 0.26 11.2 B 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.36 11.0 B 0.15 8.0 A 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.44 17.8 B 0.62 25.1 C 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.25 13.5 B 0.25 9.0 A 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A N/A 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A N/A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway N/A N/A
21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A N/A
22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard N/A N/A
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
652
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 13
Near-Term Plus Project Conditions
Near-term plus project conditions were developed to determine the effect that the residential component of the project will have on the transportation system under opening year conditions. The analysis assumes the transportation network would remain the same as today with the two residential parcels being accessed by Central Parkway. This analysis analyzed two project driveway intersections (#19 & #21) and assumes the intersection of Croak Road and Central Parkway would be constructed but would only be used by Project traffic. The lane configuration and volumes are provided in Appendix F while Appendix G has the detailed operational output sheets. Appendix L shows the change in traffic volumes between the near term no project and plus project scenarios.

Two project driveways would be needed in the near term with project scenario to provide access to the two residential parcels with one accessed off Pandora Way and the second accessed from Croak Road.

The lane configuration and traffic control assumed for these two intersections is shown below. As shown, the access for parcel 7 was assumed to be all-way stop control. This was assumed since the project is proposing a connection where Pino Grande Road curves to meet Pandora Way. All-way stop presents a conservative analysis of intersection operations for this access location and improved safety given the roadway curvature. Parcel 8 is proposed to be side street stop controlled.

Pandora Way & Parcel 7 Croak Road & Parcel 8
A summary of the intersection operations compared to the no project conditions are shown in Table 6 and Table 7 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. As shown, the residential component of the Project has limited effect on intersection operations and all intersections operate at or better than their respective LOS standard.
653
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 14
Table 6: Near-Term Operations AM Peak Hour with and without the Project # Intersection
Near-Term AM Near-Term AM PP
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.39 41.8 D 0.39 41.9 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.59 28.3 C 0.59 28.4 C 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.60 39.5 D 0.60 40.0 D 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.63 13.4 B 0.63 13.4 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.75 32.5 C 0.75 32.5 C 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.67 22.8 C 0.67 22.8 C
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 0.86 31.3 C 0.86 31.7 C 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.57 32.1 C 0.61 34.1 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.55 23.2 C 0.57 23.4 C 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.53 13.1 B 0.54 13.5 B 11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.75 8.7 A 0.78 9.0 A
12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.43 6.8 A 0.44 6.8 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.42 13.8 B 0.42 13.8 B 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.76 31.6 C 0.86 42.5 D 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.36 11.0 B 0.47 13.3 B 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.44 17.8 B 0.44 17.9 B 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.25 13.5 B 0.25 13.4 B 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A N/A 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A 0.06 7.1 A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway N/A 0.06 7.9 A
21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A 0.04 8.5 A 22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard N/A N/A
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
654
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 15
Table 7: Near-Term Operations PM Peak Hour with and without the Project # Intersection
Near-Term PM Near-Term PM PP
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.47 39.7 D 0.47 40.2 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.55 32.0 C 0.55 32.0 C 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.84 51.5 D 0.85 53.0 D 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.67 11.5 B 0.68 11.7 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.85 35.0 D 0.85 35.2 D 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.43 15.6 B 0.43 15.6 B
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 0.56 10.7 B 0.56 10.7 B 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.40 21.2 C 0.41 21.5 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.68 34.2 C 0.68 34.2 C 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.63 13.4 B 0.63 13.3 B 11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.59 24.5 C 0.59 26.5 C 12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.60 7.2 A 0.61 7.2 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.72 13.9 B 0.72 13.9 B 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.26 11.2 B 0.31 11.2 B 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.15 8.0 A 0.18 8.3 A 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.62 25.1 C 0.62 25.1 C 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.25 9.0 A 0.25 9.0 A 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A N/A 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A 0.06 7.1 A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway N/A 0.04 7.1 A
21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A 0.01 8.4 A 22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard N/A N/A
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
655
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 16
Cumulative Conditions
Cumulative conditions assesses whether the Project will have significant effects to the transportation network in the year 2040 which is the current horizon year for the city of Dublin travel demand model.

Cumulative no project conditions analyze the operations of the study intersections in 2040 based on changes to the transportation network and travel demand growth from land use changes between today and 2040. Cumulative lane configurations and traffic volumes are provided in Appendix H. Appendix I provides the detailed output sheets for Cumulative conditions.

Key changes to the transportation network affecting the study intersections are related to Dublin Boulevard which is proposed to be extended from Fallon Road east to North Canyons Parkway. This extension will also result in the extension of Croak Road to connect Central Parkway with the Dublin Boulevard extension. Finally, Fallon Road is assumed to be widened to four through lanes in each direction between the I-580 WB Off-Ramp and Central Parkway consistent with the plan line study. The effects on lane configuration are detailed below comparing existing and cumulative conditions.  Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard (#9) – Based on discussions with the city of Dublin, the current 65% design plans for the Dublin Boulevard extension, and the Fallon Road plan line, this intersection will be reconfigured as shown below.

Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions
 Fallon Road and Fallon Gateway (#10) – Based on discussions with the city of Dublin and considering the Fallon Road plan line study, this intersection will be reconfigured as shown below.

Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions
656
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 17
 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway (#16) – As part of the Dublin Boulevard extension project, this intersection will be reconfigured as shown below.

Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions
 Croak Road & Central Parkway (#20) – As part of planned roadway changes in the future, this intersection will provide access to new housing development off Central Parkway and be part of the Croak Road connection between Central Parkway and Dublin Boulevard. The intersection is assumed to be configured as shown below.

N/A (Does Not Exist Today)
Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions
657
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 18
 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard (#22) – As part of planned roadway changes in the future, this intersection will connect Central Parkway to Dublin Boulevard via Croak Road. The intersection is assumed to be configured as shown below.

N/A (Does Not Exist Today)
Existing Conditions Cumulative Conditions
The operations of the study intersections under cumulative conditions are summarized in Table 8. Four intersections are anticipated to operate below their respective LOS standard. These intersections include:
 Tassajara Road and Dublin Boulevard is projected to operate at LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours which is below the LOS E standard for intersections on routes of regional significance.  Fallon Road & Positano Parkway is projected to operate at LOS F in the AM peak hour which is below the LOS E standard for intersections on routes of regional significance.  Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway is projected to operate at LOS F in the PM peak hour which is below the LOS E standard for intersections on routes of regional significance.  Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramp is projected to operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour which is below the LOS D standard for signalized intersections not on routes of regional significance. 658
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 19
Table 8 Cumulative Operations - Weekday AM and Weekday PM Peak Hours # Intersection
Cumulative AM Cumulative PM
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.57 64.8 E 0.67 46.0 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.64 29.3 C 0.78 48.7 D 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 1.19 178.7 F 1.35 144.3 F 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.76 15.2 B 0.81 15.5 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.81 36.4 D 0.97 48.3 D 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.73 26.7 C 0.52 18.0 B
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 1.09 94.2 F 0.71 16.6 B 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.59 32.8 C 0.61 25.8 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.70 43.7 D 0.74 48.1 D 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.33 9.6 A 0.48 10.7 B
11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.71 13.5 B 0.75 61.5 E 12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.69 7.5 A 0.79 8.5 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.75 41.7 D 0.78 31.1 C 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.79 33.4 C 0.26 11.4 B 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.36 11.0 B 0.15 8.1 A 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.69 23.8 C 1.19 145.0 F 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.47 64.2 E 0.36 7.9 A 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A N/A 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A N/A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway 0.50 11.6 B 0.59 13.5 B 21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A N/A
22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.62 21.1 C 0.64 18.8 B Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
659
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 20
Cumulative Plus Project Conditions
The cumulative plus project analysis estimates the effect of the full Project on conditions in 2040. The Project was coded into the travel demand model due to its size and potential to change non-project travel patterns in the vicinity. Lane configurations were similar to the no project cumulative conditions but there were three additional intersections added including one for each residential partial (also modeled for the near-term plus project conditions) and an access point for the industrial development that was added between Fallon Road and Croak Road along the Dublin Boulevard extension.

There are no site plans for any component of the Project except the residential parcels. Kittelson has assumed that the office, retail, and hotel components of the Project will be accessed via the Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway intersections. No access is assumed at this intersection for the approximately 2.9 million square feet of advanced manufacturing space. These land uses are all assumed to have access to either the Dublin Boulevard extension or Croak Road. Lane configurations assumed in this analysis for the access points into the non-residential portions of the Project are shown below. The residential access points would remain the same as shown in the near-term plus project conditions.

Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Full Access between Fallon Road and Croak Road
Dublin Boulevard & Croak Road
The lane configuration and volumes are provided in Appendix J while Appendix K has the detailed operational output sheets. Appendix M shows the change in traffic volumes between the near term no project and plus project scenarios. A summary of the intersection operations compared to the no project Project Access
Project Access
Project Access
Project Access
660
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 21
conditions are shown in Table 9 and Table 10 for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Key findings from the cumulative plus project evaluation include:
 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard (#3) is projected to operate at LOS F with and without the Project under cumulative conditions. However, the Projects effect on traffic volumes in the area result in enough of a change that the Project improves intersection operations at this location in both the AM and PM peak hour. No recommendations for improvement are proposed at this location since the operations are improving.
 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway (#7) is projected to fail in the AM peak hour for the cumulative no project scenario. The redistribution of vehicles as a result of the Project resulted in the intersection improving to LOS E for the AM peak hour which meets the LOS E standard for intersections on routes of regional significance. No recommendations for improvement are proposed at this location since the Project results in an improvement to operations at the intersection where it will meet the LOS standard.
 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard (#9) is projected to deteriorate from LOS D to LOS F in the PM peak hour as a result of the Project. Recommendations for improvement at this location are detailed in the next section of the report.
 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps (#11) is projected to deteriorate to LOS F in the AM and PM peak hours as a result of the Project. While there are plans to improve the interchange of Fallon Road and I-580, this analysis has assumed there are no changes to present a conservative case.

Recommendations for improvement at this location are detailed in the next section of the report.  Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway (#16) is projected to fail in the PM peak hour for the cumulative no project scenario. The redistribution of vehicles as a result of the Project resulted in reduced delay at the intersection. No recommendations for improvement are proposed at this location since the Project results in an improvement to operations at the intersection.  Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramp (#17) is projected to operate at LOS E in the AM peak hour under cumulative no project conditions. The redistribution of vehicles as a result of the Project will improve the intersection to LOS D. No recommendations for improvement are proposed at this location since the Project results in an improvement to operations. 661
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 22
Table 9: Cumulative Operations AM Peak Hour with and without the Project # Intersection
Cumulative AM Cumulative AM PP
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.57 64.8 E 0.56 56.7 E 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.64 29.3 C 0.64 29.1 C 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 1.19 178.7 F 1.20 166.8 F 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.76 15.2 B 0.78 15.9 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.81 36.4 D 0.81 36.3 D 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.73 26.7 C 0.70 26.4 C
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 1.09 94.2 F 1.05 75.0 E 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.59 32.8 C 0.66 42.9 D 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.70 43.7 D 0.80 45.0 D 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.33 9.6 A 0.43 15.8 B
11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.71 13.5 B 1.06 179.5 F 12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.69 7.5 A 0.84 10.1 B 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.75 41.7 D 0.87 76.7 E 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.79 33.4 C 0.79 34.4 C 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.36 11.0 B 0.38 12.0 B 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 0.69 23.8 C 0.73 25.1 C 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.47 64.2 E 0.48 42.7 D 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A 0.65 33.8 C 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A 0.06 7.1 A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway 0.50 11.6 B 0.51 11.8 B 21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A 0.06 10.4 B 22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.62 21.1 C 0.65 36.0 D Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
662
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 23
Table 10: Cumulative Operations PM Peak Hour with and without the Project # Intersection
Cumulative PM Cumulative PM PP
V/C Delay LOS V/C Delay LOS
1 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard 0.67 46.0 D 0.68 44.5 D 2 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway 0.78 48.7 D 0.76 45.1 D 3 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard 1.35 144.3 F 1.33 133.1 F 4 Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.81 15.5 B 0.82 16.7 B 5 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr 0.97 48.3 D 0.97 45.6 D 6 Tassajara Road & Fallon Road 0.52 18.0 B 0.49 17.1 B
7 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway 0.71 16.6 B 0.71 15.1 B 8 Fallon Road & Central Parkway 0.61 25.8 C 0.62 26.3 C 9 Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.74 48.1 D 0.89 83.4 F 10 Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway 0.48 10.7 B 0.73 42.4 D 11 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps 0.75 61.5 E 1.20 113.4 F 12 El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps 0.79 8.5 A 0.83 8.5 A 13 El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard 0.78 31.1 C 0.80 38.6 D 14 Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive 0.26 11.4 B 0.29 11.8 B 15 Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road 0.15 8.1 A 0.15 8.2 A 16 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway 1.19 145.0 F 1.15 142.7 F 17 Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps 0.36 7.9 A 0.38 9.2 A 18 Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway N/A 0.95 54.9 D 19 Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) N/A 0.06 7.1 A 20 Croak Road & Central Parkway 0.59 13.5 B 0.61 14.0 B 21 Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) N/A 0.02 10.4 B 22 Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard 0.64 18.8 B 0.85 44.6 D Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Delay in seconds; Grey highlighted cells indicate operations below the LOS standard; N/A indicated intersection does not exist under the analysis scenario.
663
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 24
95th Percentile Queue
In addition to an assessment of intersection operations, 95th percentile queues were assessed for each of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours. Comparisons between the estimated queue storage and estimated queue length are shown in Table 11 and Table 12. Queues shown in these tables are reported in feet and rounded up to the nearest 5 foot increment. Grey highlighted cells indicate where 95th percentile queues are estimated to exceed the available queue storage. Potential recommendations to address queues are provided when the Project causes the queue to exceed the available storage, or the Project increases the queue for a movement already exceeding the storage by 25 feet (one vehicle) or more. The following intersections and movements were found to meet these criteria:
 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard (#1)
o The Project causes the NBL turn lane to exceed the available storage by 5 feet under cumulative conditions in the PM peak hour.
 Tassajara Road & Central Parkway (#2)
o The Project causes the EBR turn lane, which already exceeds the available storage under cumulative conditions in the PM peak hour, to increase from 275 feet to 355 feet.  Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard (#3)
o The Project causes the NBR turn lane, which is already exceeding the available storage, to increase from approximately 1,810 feet to 2,170 feet under cumulative plus project conditions in the AM peak hour.
o The Project causes the NBR turn lane, which is already exceeding the available storage, to increase from approximately 1,200 feet to 1,260 feet under near-term plus project conditions in the PM peak hour.
 Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr (#5)
o The Project causes the SBL turn lane, which is already exceeding the available storage, to increase from approximately 440 feet to 500 feet under cumulative plus project conditions in the PM peak hour.
 Fallon Road & Positano Parkway (#7)
o The Project causes the NBR turn lane to exceed the available storage by 10 feet under cumulative conditions in the PM peak hour.
 Fallon Road & Central Parkway (#8)
o The Project causes the WBL turn lane to increase from 200 feet to 255 feet (approximately two vehicles) under near-term plus project conditions in the AM peak hour. This causes the WBL turn movement to exceed the available 200 foot storage.  Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard (#9)
o The Project causes the southbound right turn lane, which is already exceeding the available storage under cumulative no project conditions in the AM peak hour and PM peak hours, to increase from 355 feet to 530 feet in the AM and 195 feet to 350 feet in the PM.
o The Project causes the SBL turn lane, which already exceeds the available storage under cumulative PM conditions, to extend from 210 feet to 390 feet.  Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps (#11)
o The Project causes the SBR turn lane to exceed the available storage by more than 1,500 feet in the PM peak hour under cumulative conditions.
664
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 25
 Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway (#16)
o The Project causes the westbound left turn, which is already exceeding the available storage under cumulative conditions in the AM peak hour, to increase from 280 feet to 310 feet.
665
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 26
Table 11: AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue in Feet
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Intersection 1: Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 250 380 300 220 300 250 275 -
Existing 130 120 15 110 75 60 175 -
Near-Term 145 120 15 125 75 75 240 -
Near-Term Plus Project 145 120 15 125 75 75 250 -
Cumulative 195 120 15 170 75 105 740 -
Cumulative Plus Project 205 125 15 115 75 95 625 -
Intersection 2: Tassajara Road & Central Parkway
Storage 325 325 300 215 225 225 300 -
Existing 50 55 25 70 150 95 170 -
Near-Term 55 60 25 75 150 95 170 -
Near-Term Plus Project 55 60 25 75 150 95 170 -
Cumulative 60 75 35 100 150 95 170 -
Cumulative Plus Project 50 70 30 80 150 95 170 -
Intersection 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 380 250 295 290 265 330 395 -
Existing 90 270 25 55 55 60 190 -
Near-Term 115 465 35 65 65 60 220 -
Near-Term Plus Project 120 470 35 70 65 60 225 -
Cumulative 165 1810 60 85 70 60 260 -
Cumulative Plus Project 185 2170 65 95 70 60 230 -
Intersection 4: Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - - - - 1325 1325
Existing - - - - - - 205 110
Near-Term - - - - - - 205 110
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - 205 110
666
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 27
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Cumulative - - - - - - 205 115
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - 205 115
Intersection 5: Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr Storage - - 425 - 625 - 200 250
Existing - - 240 - 410 - 105 185
Near-Term - - 240 - 440 - 105 185
Near-Term Plus Project - - 240 - 440 - 105 185
Cumulative - - 240 - 555 - 105 190
Cumulative Plus Project - - 240 - 550 - 105 195
Intersection 6: Tassajara Road & Fallon Road
Storage 175 175 175 225 475 175 100 100
Existing 180 5 5 175 85 175 20 10
Near-Term 200 10 5 210 100 190 20 10
Near-Term Plus Project 200 10 5 210 100 190 20 10
Cumulative 260 10 5 320 160 240 25 20
Cumulative Plus Project 250 10 5 275 150 230 30 15
Intersection 7: Fallon Road & Positano Parkway
Storage - 225 335 - - - 360 450
Existing - 150 290 - - - 175 345
Near-Term - 155 315 - - - 185 615
Near-Term Plus Project - 155 315 - - - 185 625
Cumulative - 170 375 - - - 200 2075
Cumulative Plus Project - 160 395 - - - 215 1765
Intersection 8: Fallon Road & Central Parkway
Storage 300 255 295 245 350 230 250 250
Existing 35 160 105 60 35 50 200 85
Near-Term 40 160 105 65 40 50 200 85
667
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 28
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Near-Term Plus Project 40 185 110 70 40 55 255 95
Cumulative 50 160 110 75 45 105 205 85
Cumulative Plus Project 50 170 110 75 45 130 210 90
Intersection 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 430 - 140 225 400 400 - -
Existing 190 80 0 100 115 145 0 0
Near-Term 200 115 5 135 115 140 15 45
Near-Term Plus Project 210 115 5 150 115 140 15 45
Cumulative 195 135 15 355 135 90 10 295
Cumulative Plus Project 175 625 105 530 135 105 10 315
Intersection 10: Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway
Storage 275 - - - 210 210 - -
Existing 60 - - - 10 25 - -
Near-Term 60 - - - 10 25 - -
Near-Term Plus Project 60 - - - 10 25 - -
Cumulative 55 - - - 10 20 - -
Cumulative Plus Project 75 - 90 - 10 40 30 25
Intersection 11: Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - 225 - - 1550 1550
Existing - - - 75 - - 35 40
Near-Term - - - 85 - - 40 50
Near-Term Plus Project - - - 100 - - 45 50
Cumulative - - - 145 - - 65 95
Cumulative Plus Project - - - 180 - - 85 130
Intersection 12: El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps Storage - - - - 605 605 - - 668
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 29
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Existing - - - - 25 20 - -
Near-Term - - - - 25 25 - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - 25 25 - -
Cumulative - - - - 25 35 - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - 100 40 - -
Intersection 13: El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard Storage 125 - 650 450 450 325 400 775
Existing 5 - 30 15 25 5 10 25
Near-Term 15 - 35 35 35 5 25 45
Near-Term Plus Project 20 - 35 35 35 5 25 50
Cumulative 100 - 75 185 95 25 125 210
Cumulative Plus Project 120 - 75 200 110 25 120 230
Intersection 14: Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive
Storage 250 250 100 100 225 800 150 -
Existing 200 20 30 225 65 245 25 -
Near-Term 205 25 30 230 65 250 30 -
Near-Term Plus Project 225 25 30 285 70 235 30 -
Cumulative 220 25 30 240 65 275 30 -
Cumulative Plus Project 225 25 30 245 65 275 50 -
Intersection 15: Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road Storage - - - 100 275 - 100 -
Existing - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Near-Term - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Cumulative - - - 5 5 - 0 -
669
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 30
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Cumulative Plus Project - - - 5 5 - 5 -
Intersection 16: Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway
Storage 535 535 - - - 500 110 -
Existing 165 55 - - - 70 70 -
Near-Term 335 65 - - - 100 130 -
Near-Term Plus Project 335 65 - - - 100 130 -
Cumulative 420 105 - - - 190 280 -
Cumulative Plus Project 435 120 - - - 220 310 -
Intersection 17: Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - - - - 1400 1400
Existing - - - - - - 35 75
Near-Term - - - - - - 30 150
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - 30 150
Cumulative - - - - - - 30 725
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - 35 565
Intersection 18: Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project 80 - 25 35 270 415 0 -
Intersection 19: Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
670
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 31
AM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 20: Croak Road & Central Parkway
Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 21: Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 22: Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative 0 - 105 - 0 0 0 10
Cumulative Plus Project 45 - 120 - 205 120 380 55
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Queues in feet rounded up to nearest 5 foot increment; Grey highlighted cells indicate 95th percentile queues exceeding the available storage; “-“ indicates turn pocket does not exist. 671
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 32
Table 12: PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue in Feet
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Intersection 1: Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 250 380 300 220 300 250 275 -
Existing 90 210 55 100 105 70 145 -
Near-Term 125 215 55 95 140 115 160 -
Near-Term Plus Project 130 225 55 95 140 135 175 -
Cumulative 220 210 55 80 280 310 200 -
Cumulative Plus Project 255 245 55 80 200 330 225 -
Intersection 2: Tassajara Road & Central Parkway
Storage 325 325 300 215 225 225 300 -
Existing 110 130 35 35 115 160 120 -
Near-Term 110 160 40 35 115 200 135 -
Near-Term Plus Project 110 160 40 35 115 200 135 -
Cumulative 110 240 55 50 115 275 175 -
Cumulative Plus Project 115 230 45 50 115 355 170 -
Intersection 3: Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 380 250 295 290 265 330 395 -
Existing 120 555 50 60 160 205 170 -
Near-Term 125 1200 90 65 165 205 220 -
Near-Term Plus Project 125 1260 90 65 165 205 220 -
Cumulative 140 3830 230 75 190 215 430 -
Cumulative Plus Project 145 3665 225 90 195 225 430 -
Intersection 4: Tassajara Road & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - - - - 1325 1325
Existing - - - - - - 160 75
Near-Term - - - - - - 160 75
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - 160 75
672
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 33
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Cumulative - - - - - - 160 80
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - 200 95
Intersection 5: Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr Storage - - 425 - 625 - 200 250
Existing - - 380 - 315 - 85 245
Near-Term - - 390 - 340 - 85 245
Near-Term Plus Project - - 390 - 345 - 85 245
Cumulative - - 440 - 425 - 85 245
Cumulative Plus Project - - 500 - 465 - 85 245
Intersection 6: Tassajara Road & Fallon Road
Storage 175 175 175 225 475 175 100 100
Existing 30 10 5 70 85 25 5 5
Near-Term 30 10 5 75 100 25 5 5
Near-Term Plus Project 30 10 5 75 105 25 5 5
Cumulative 35 10 10 100 170 35 5 10
Cumulative Plus Project 35 10 10 95 145 30 5 5
Intersection 7: Fallon Road & Positano Parkway
Storage - 225 335 - - - - -
Existing - 90 40 - - - 45 35
Near-Term - 110 75 - - - 60 40
Near-Term Plus Project - 110 75 - - - 60 40
Cumulative - 200 270 - - - 120 60
Cumulative Plus Project - 235 205 - - - 95 110
Intersection 8: Fallon Road & Central Parkway
Storage 300 255 295 245 350 230 250 250
Existing 50 90 25 65 40 40 65 25
673
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 34
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Near-Term 50 90 30 70 40 55 65 25
Near-Term Plus Project 50 145 30 70 40 60 75 30
Cumulative 60 110 35 85 55 265 85 30
Cumulative Plus Project 75 125 35 80 80 270 95 30
Intersection 9: Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage 430 - 140 225 400 400 - -
Existing 125 165 0 80 185 245 0 0
Near-Term 175 335 0 125 185 195 0 0
Near-Term Plus Project 175 355 0 130 200 195 0 0
Cumulative 240 75 210 195 215 170 115 50
Cumulative Plus Project 350 340 390 350 295 285 795 250 Intersection 10: Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway
Storage 275 - - - 210 210 - -
Existing 90 - - - 20 65 - -
Near-Term 100 - - - 20 75 - -
Near-Term Plus Project 100 - - - 20 75 - -
Cumulative 110 - - - 25 80 - -
Cumulative Plus Project 145 - 215 - 35 160 450 105
Intersection 11: Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - 225 - - 1550 1550
Existing - - - 170 - - 85 155
Near-Term - - - 190 - - 110 170
Near-Term Plus Project - - - 200 - - 110 170
Cumulative - - - 220 - - 170 170
Cumulative Plus Project - - - 1985 - - 140 190
674
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 35
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Intersection 12: El Charro Road & I-580 EB Ramps
Storage - - - - 605 605 - -
Existing - - - - 30 25 - -
Near-Term - - - - 30 30 - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - 30 30 - -
Cumulative - - - - 40 45 - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - 55 40 - -
Intersection 13: El Charro Road & Jack London Boulevard Storage 125 - 650 450 450 325 400 775
Existing 5 - 75 130 55 5 5 55
Near-Term 10 - 105 160 80 25 15 80
Near-Term Plus Project 10 - 105 160 80 25 15 80
Cumulative 80 - 320 380 255 190 80 190
Cumulative Plus Project 310 - 355 340 275 235 100 195
Intersection 14: Central Parkway & Sunset View Drive
Storage 250 250 100 100 225 800 150 -
Existing 5 5 5 20 25 5 0 -
Near-Term 5 5 5 20 25 5 5 -
Near-Term Plus Project 5 5 5 25 25 5 5 -
Cumulative 5 5 5 20 25 10 5 -
Cumulative Plus Project 10 5 5 25 25 5 10 -
Intersection 15: Central Parkway & Panorama Drive/Pino Grande Road Storage - - - 100 275 - 100 -
Existing - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Near-Term - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - 5 5 - 0 -
Cumulative - - - 5 5 - 0 -
675
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 36
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Cumulative Plus Project - - - 5 5 - 5 -
Intersection 16: Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway
Storage 535 535 - - - 500 110 -
Existing 185 70 - - - 145 200 -
Near-Term 190 150 - - - 310 275 -
Near-Term Plus Project 190 150 - - - 310 275 -
Cumulative 85 350 - - - 1705 920 -
Cumulative Plus Project 120 360 - - - 1395 905 -
Intersection 17: Airway Boulevard & I-580 WB Ramps
Storage - - - - - - 1400 1400
Existing - - - - - - 30 100
Near-Term - - - - - - 35 105
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - 35 105
Cumulative - - - - - - 35 120
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - 35 140
Intersection 18: Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access Driveway Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project 545 - 95 365 145 180 0 -
Intersection 19: Pandora Way & Residential Project Access Driveway (Parcel 7) Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
676
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 37
PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queues in Feet (Rounded Up to Nearest 5 Feet) Intersection NBL NBR SBL SBR EBL EBR WBL WBR
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 20: Croak Road & Central Parkway
Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 21: Croak Road & Project Access (Parcel 8) Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative - - - - - - - -
Cumulative Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Intersection 22: Croak Road & Dublin Boulevard
Storage - - - - - - - -
Existing - - - - - - - -
Near-Term - - - - - - - -
Near-Term Plus Project - - - - - - - -
Cumulative 0 - 20 - 75 0 10 20
Cumulative Plus Project 365 - 105 - 210 45 195 55
Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition Methodologies Notes: Queues in feet rounded up to nearest 5 foot increment; Grey highlighted cells indicate 95th percentile queues exceeding the available storage; “-“ indicates turn pocket does not exist. 677
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 38

CMP ASSESSMENT
This section presents the findings of the Alameda CTC Land Use analysis under Existing Conditions and Cumulative Conditions with and without the Project. The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) Land Use analysis was performed to comply with its congestion management plan (CMP) Land Use Analysis Program. In the CMP, development projects generating more than 100 PM net new peak hour trips are analyzed to determine their effect on Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) roadways. Since the Alameda CTC Land Use Analysis Program’s 100-trip criteria is in the PM peak hour this analysis was evaluated in the PM peak hour only.

The city of Dublin’s travel demand model, which is a more refined version of the Alameda CTC travel demand model for Dublin, was used to determine the project’s effect on V/C ratio for the base year (2020) and future year (2040) models. Kittelson used the model to determine volume, capacity, and V/C ratio for all Tier 1 and Tier 2 CMP segments in the city of Dublin located east of Interstate 680. This included the Interstate 580 freeway, Dublin Boulevard, Fallon Road, Dougherty Road, Tassajara Road, and Village Parkway.

The findings of the CMP analysis using the city of Dublin’s travel demand model for volume, capacity, an V/C ratio is shown in Table 13 and Table 14 for existing and 2040 conditions with and without project, respectively. Alameda CTC does not have an adopted threshold for determining when a CMP segment is affected by a land use analysis project. Past analyses within the city of Dublin have used the following criteria to assess CMP roadway segment effects:
• For a roadway segment of the Alameda CTC CMP Network, the project would cause (a) the LOS to degrade from LOS E or better to LOS F or (b) the v/c ratio to increase by 0.02 or more for a roadway segment that would operate at LOS F without the project.

As shown in Table 13 and Table 14, some CMP segments were found to operate at LOS F. However, the Project did not result in any CMP segments deteriorating to LOS F or increase the V/C ratio for and intersection already at LOS F by 0.02 or more. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to have a substantial effect on CMP segments in the city of Dublin. 678
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 39
Table 13: Analysis of CMP Segments for Existing Conditions CMP
ID CMP Route From To # of Lanes
Capacity
(vphpl)
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Project
Trips
Δ
Volume V/C
(vph) LOS V/C Volume (vph) LOS V/C
F21 I-580 - EB I-680 Hopyard 6 13,200 10,063 D 0.76 10,104 D 0.77 41 0.00 F22 I-580 - EB Hopyard Santa Rita 5 9,900 8,785 D 0.89 8,899 D 0.90 114 0.01 F23 I-580 - EB Santa Rita El Charro 5 9,900 9,368 E 0.95 9,389 E 0.95 21 0.00 F24 I-580 - EB El Charro SR 84/Airway Blvd. 5 9,900 10,170 F 1.03 10,184 F 1.03 14 0.00 F37 I-580 - WB SR 84/Airway Blvd Fallon Rd/El Charro 5 9,900 5,959 C 0.60 5,962 C 0.60 3 0.00 F38 I-580 - WB Fallon Rd/El Charro Tassajara 5 9,900 5,928 C 0.60 5,938 C 0.60 10 0.00 F39 I-580 - WB Tassajara Rd I-680 5 9,900 7,315 C 0.74 7,323 C 0.74 8 0.00 T145 Dublin Blvd.-EB Village Parkway Dougherty Rd 3 3,300 887 A 0.27 896 A 0.27 9 0.00 T146 Dublin Blvd.-EB Dougherty Rd Hacienda Dr 3 3,300 2,242 B 0.68 2,197 B 0.67 -45 -0.01 T147 Dublin Blvd.-EB Hacienda Dr Tassajara Dr 3 3,300 2,979 D 0.90 2,941 D 0.89 -38 -0.01 T334 Dublin Blvd.-EB Tassajara Road Fallon Road 3 3,150 1,071 A 0.34 1,079 A 0.34 8 0.00 T231 Dublin Blvd.-WB Fallon Road Tassajara Road 3 3,150 165 A 0.05 170 A 0.05 5 0.00 T148 Dublin Blvd.-WB Tassajara Dr Hacienda Dr 3 3,300 233 A 0.07 237 A 0.07 4 0.00 T149 Dublin Blvd.-WB Hacienda Dr Dougherty Rd 3 3,300 91 A 0.03 91 A 0.03 0 0.00 T150 Dublin Blvd.-WB Dougherty Rd Village Parkway 3 3,300 541 A 0.16 540 A 0.16 -1 0.00 T239 Fallon Rd.-NB I-580 Tassajara Road 3 3,150 1,088 A 0.35 1,171 A 0.37 83 0.03 T342 Fallon Rd.-SB Tassajara Road I-580 3 3,150 534 A 0.17 553 A 0.18 19 0.01 T156 Dougherty Road-NB WB I-580 OFF ramp Amador Valley Blvd on SB 3 3,300 3,292 E 1.00 3,286 E 1.00 -6 0.00 T157 Dougherty Road-NB Amador Valley Blvd on SB Fallcreek Rd on SB/County Line 3 3,150 2,657 D 0.84 2,654 D 0.84 -3 0.00 679
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 40
CMP
ID CMP Route From To # of Lanes
Capacity
(vphpl)
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Project
Trips
Δ
Volume V/C
(vph) LOS V/C Volume (vph) LOS V/C
T158 Dougherty Road-SB Fallcreek Rd on SB/County Line Amador Valley Blvd on SB 3 3,150 743 A 0.24 744 A 0.24 1 0.00 T159 Dougherty Road-SB Amador Valley Blvd on SB WB I-580 OFF ramp 4 4,400 1,184 A 0.27 1,189 A 0.27 5 0.00 T160 Tassajara Road-NB WB I-580 OFF ramp Central Parkway 2 2,100 2,093 E 1.00 2,093 E 1.00 0 0.00 T161 Tassajara Road-NB Central Parkway Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr 2 2,100 1,373 B 0.65 1,380 B 0.66 7 0.00 T162 Tassajara Road-NB Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr Fallon Rd 1 1,050 625 A 0.60 627 A 0.60 2 0.00 T163 Tassajara Road-NB Fallon Rd County Line 1 1,050 833 C 0.79 837 C 0.80 4 0.00 T164 Tassajara Road-SB County Line Fallon Rd 1 1,050 450 A 0.43 452 A 0.43 2 0.00 T165 Tassajara Road-SB Fallon Rd Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr 1 1,050 283 A 0.27 282 A 0.27 -1 0.00 T166 Tassajara Road-SB Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr Central Parkway 2 2,100 485 A 0.23 488 A 0.23 3 0.00 T167 Tassajara Road-SB Central Parkway WB I-580 OFF ramp 3 3,150 845 A 0.27 847 A 0.27 2 0.00 T291 Village Parkway - NB Dublin Boulevard County Line 2 2,100 649 A 0.31 646 A 0.31 -3 0.00 T394 Village Parkway - SB Dublin Boulevard County Line 2 2,100 445 A 0.21 440 A 0.21 -5 0.00 Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on CMP Segment information from the city of Dublin’s Travel Demand Model Notes: Bolded text indicates LOS below the CMP standard; V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio.

Table 14: Analysis of CMP Segments for 2040 Conditions
CMP ID CMP Route From To # of
Lanes
Capacity
(vphpl)
2040 No Project 2040 Plus Project
Project
Trips
Δ
Volume V/C
(vph) LOS V/C Volume (vph) LOS V/C
F21 I-580 - EB I-680 Hopyard 6 13,500 10,242 D 0.76 10,193 D 0.76 -49 0.00 F22 I-580 - EB Hopyard Santa Rita 5 10,125 9,478 E 0.94 9,443 E 0.93 -35 0.00 680
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 41
CMP ID CMP Route From To # of
Lanes
Capacity
(vphpl)
2040 No Project 2040 Plus Project
Project
Trips
Δ
Volume V/C
(vph) LOS V/C Volume (vph) LOS V/C
F23 I-580 - EB Santa Rita El Charro 5 10,125 10,125 F 1.00 10,172 F 1.00 47 0.00 F24 I-580 - EB El Charro SR 84/Airway Blvd. 5 10,125 10,807 F 1.07 10,923 F 1.08 116 0.01 F37 I-580 - WB SR 84/Airway Blvd Fallon Rd/El Charro 5 10,125 6,837 C 0.68 6,763 C 0.67 -74 -0.01 F38 I-580 - WB Fallon Rd/El Charro Tassajara 5 10,125 6,806 C 0.67 7,290 C 0.72 484 0.05 F39 I-580 - WB Tassajara Rd I-680 5 10,125 8,099 D 0.80 8,273 D 0.82 174 0.02 T145 Dublin Blvd.-EB Village Parkway Dougherty Rd 3 3,300 1,421 A 0.43 1,391 A 0.42 -30 -0.01 T146 Dublin Blvd.-EB Dougherty Rd Hacienda Dr 3 3,300 2,932 D 0.89 2,894 D 0.88 -38 -0.01 T147 Dublin Blvd.-EB Hacienda Dr Tassajara Dr 3 3,300 3,207 E 0.97 3,264 E 0.99 57 0.02 T334 Dublin Blvd.-EB Tassajara Road Fallon Road 3 3,150 2,759 D 0.88 2,652 D 0.84 -107 -0.03 T231 Dublin Blvd.-WB Fallon Road Tassajara Road 3 3,150 426 A 0.14 523 A 0.17 97 0.03 T148 Dublin Blvd.-WB Tassajara Dr Hacienda Dr 3 3,300 424 A 0.13 485 A 0.15 61 0.02 T149 Dublin Blvd.-WB Hacienda Dr Dougherty Rd 3 3,300 471 A 0.14 557 A 0.17 86 0.03 T150 Dublin Blvd.-WB Dougherty Rd Village Parkway 3 3,300 1,126 A 0.34 1,248 A 0.38 122 0.04 T239 Fallon Rd.-NB I-580 Tassajara Road 3 3,150 1,027 A 0.33 1,209 A 0.38 182 0.06 T342 Fallon Rd.-SB Tassajara Road I-580 3 3,150 1,045 A 0.33 1,072 A 0.34 27 0.01 T156 Dougherty Road-NB WB I-580 OFF ramp Amador Valley Blvd on SB 3 3,300 3,244 E 0.98 3,254 E 0.99 10 0.00 T157 Dougherty Road-NB Amador Valley Blvd on SB Fallcreek Rd on SB/County Line 3 3,150 2,907 E 0.92 2,911 E 0.92 4 0.00 T158 Dougherty Road-SB Fallcreek Rd on SB/County Line Amador Valley Blvd on SB 3 3,150 920 A 0.29 909 A 0.29 -11 0.00 T159 Dougherty Road-SB Amador Valley Blvd on SB WB I-580 OFF ramp 4 3,300 1,073 A 0.33 1,044 A 0.32 -29 -0.01 T160 Tassajara Road-NB WB I-580 OFF ramp Central Parkway 2 2,100 1,789 D 0.85 1,830 D 0.87 41 0.02 681
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 42
CMP ID CMP Route From To # of
Lanes
Capacity
(vphpl)
2040 No Project 2040 Plus Project
Project
Trips
Δ
Volume V/C
(vph) LOS V/C Volume (vph) LOS V/C
T161 Tassajara Road-NB Central Parkway Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr 2 2,100 1,680 C 0.80 1,598 C 0.76 -82 -0.04 T162 Tassajara Road-NB Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr Fallon Rd 2 2,100 894 A 0.43 824 A 0.39 -70 -0.03 T163 Tassajara Road-NB Fallon Rd County Line 2 2,100 1,064 A 0.51 1,068 A 0.51 4 0.00 T164 Tassajara Road-SB County Line Fallon Rd 2 2,100 823 A 0.39 768 A 0.37 -55 -0.03 T165 Tassajara Road-SB Fallon Rd Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr 2 2,100 346 A 0.16 354 A 0.17 8 0.00 T166 Tassajara Road-SB Somerset Ln/N Dublin Ranch Dr Central Parkway 2 2,100 553 A 0.26 556 A 0.26 3 0.00 T167 Tassajara Road-SB Central Parkway WB I-580 OFF ramp 3 3,150 1,036 A 0.33 1,145 A 0.36 109 0.03 T291 Village Parkway - NB Dublin Boulevard County Line 2 2,100 1,192 A 0.57 1,265 A 0.60 73 0.03 T394 Village Parkway - SB Dublin Boulevard County Line 2 2,100 733 A 0.35 723 A 0.34 -10 0.00 Source: Kittelson & Associates, 2024 based on CMP Segment information from the city of Dublin’s Travel Demand Model Notes: Bolded text indicates LOS below the CMP standard; V/C = Volume to Capacity Ratio. 682
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 43

PARKING ASSESSMENT
The residential units for the Project are in two different parcels. Parcel 7 is accessed off Pandora Way and Pino Grande Road and contains 128 residential units. Parcel 8 is accessed off Croak Road and contains 110 units. This section analyzes whether these two parcels provide adequate parking to meet the requirements of Dublin’s municipal code. Dublin’s municipal code requires residential units that are townhouses similar to the Project to provide two enclosed garage parking spaces per unit and one on-street parking space located within 150 feet of the unit. The site plans dated February 2024 show slightly fewer parking spaces indicating a request for a parking requirement reduction. Table 15 provides a comparison between the required parking per the Dublin Municipal Code and the provided parking detailed in the site plan. As shown, guest parking has about ten (10) fewer spaces than the parking required per the municipal code.

Table 15: Municipal Code Required Vs. Site Plan Provided Residential Parking Units
Municipal Code Site Plan
Enclosed Guest Enclosed Guest
Parcel 7 128 256 128 256 120
Parcel 8 110 220 110 220 108
Total 238 476 238 476 228
To assess whether the loss of ten parking spaces is significant, Kittelson reviewed the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition. This manual does not contain parking studies for single family dwelling units such as the Project’s townhouses. The most similar land use where parking data is available is multifamily housing (low-rise). Table 16 provides a comparison between the municipal code, the site plan total, and the ITE parking generation estimate based on the 33rd, average, and 85th percentile demand. As shown, both the municipal code and the side plan require/provide significantly more parking than the 85th percentile parking generation numbers. This indicates that both Parcel 7 and Parcel 8 should not be affected by the loss of ten parking spaces compared to the code.

Table 16: ITE Parking Generation Vs. Provides and Municipal Code Requirements Units Municipal Code
Total Site Plan Total
ITE Parking Generation
33rd Average 85th
Parcel 7 128 384 376 132 155 195
Parcel 8 110 330 328 114 134 168
Total 238 714 704 246 289 363
While a reduction from code requirements of ten parking spaces is unlikely to result in insufficient parking supply, the municipal code does require the guest parking to be within 150 feet of the building. In both Parcel 7 and Parcel 8, some guest parking is available within 150 feet of all the residential units. However, the majority of guest parking is provided at the southern end of the site plan, especially for Parcel 8. If 683
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 44
guest parking were assigned to individual units, there would be many units in the northern part of the site plan that would have their guest parking more than 150 feet from the unit. Kittelson believes this does not align with the municipal code requirements to provide guest parking within 150 feet since most guests visiting residential units in the northern part of the site plan would have to park more than 150 feet from the residential unit.
684
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 45

4. DISCUSSION OF EFFECTS & RECOMMENDED

IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the operations assessment under existing, near-term, and cumulative conditions, two intersections were identified as experiencing a significant effect because of the Project. Details of the effect and proposed improvements are discussed in this section.

Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard
This intersection serves as one of the primary access points serving the approximately 2.9 million square feet of advanced manufacturing land use proposed by the Project. The majority of these jobs are anticipated to depart the Project in the PM peak hour heading west along Dublin Boulevard or making a left onto Fallon Road to access the I-580 freeway. There is little land use to the east or north of the Project which results in a heavy demand for the westbound movements at Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard. The westbound left turn at this intersection for example is projected to increase from about 190 vehicles to almost 1,200 vehicles. This amount of left turn volume overloads the triple left turn lanes at this location resulting in poor intersection operations.

There are few options at this location to reduce the effect of the Project since it is already operating with triple left turns lanes. Therefore, Kittelson recommends two strategies that can be considered in parallel.

The first is an extensive TDM strategy to reduce vehicle trips in the PM peak hour. Kittelson estimated that trip generation in the PM peak hour would need to show more than a 50% reduction to project trips.

Should a significant reduction not be feasible, the city should consider requesting upgrades to multimodal infrastructure such as protected bike lanes along Fallon Road in lieu of improvements that benefit vehicles.

In addition to a comprehensive TDM plan, the advanced manufacturing component of the Project should be able to access Fallon Road at the Fallon Gateway intersection. There is additional capacity at this intersection to carry more westbound left turn volumes which would reduce the demand for the westbound left turn at Dublin Boulevard on Fallon Road. The effect on LOS cannot be fully quantified without a detailed site plan which will be needed to make the assignment split between exiting onto Dublin Boulevard or onto Fallon Road via Fallon Gateway.

Once a site plan is submitted, a careful review should be performed to ensure that the demand for vehicles exiting the advanced manufacturing components of the Project are able to distribute as evenly as possible between the two intersections along Fallon Road at Fallon Gateway and Dublin Boulevard.

The layout of this intersection was analyzed to align with the Fallon Road plan line study which calls for four lanes in each direction. This lane alignment and the recommended queue storage for the turn lanes based on cumulative plus project conditions is shown below. 685
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 46
Fallon Road (N/S) & Dublin Boulevard
(E/W) Proposed Lane Assignment
NBL: 350’
NBR: 625’
SBL: 390’
SBR: 530’
EBL: 295’
EBR: 285’
WBL: 795’*
WBR: 315’
*Demand exceeds capacity, implementing TDM measures
and providing internal project connections to Fallon
Gateway will reduce queue length
Fallon Road & Fallon Gateway
As a primary intersection providing access to the Project and one of two allowing access to Fallon Road for Project traffic, this intersection has a high volume of vehicles. Based on the operations analysis the minimum lane configuration for this intersection along with the required queue storage for turn lanes is shown below. A single SB left turn lane into the project should be sufficient. Exiting the project on the east leg should have a double left turn lane, a through lane, and a right turn lane. If an internal connection to the advanced manufacturing land uses connects at Fallon Gateway, the WB left turn storage would increase as left turning vehicles shift from the Fallon Road and Dublin Boulevard intersection.

Fallon Road (N/S) & Fallon Gateway
(E/W) Proposed Lane Assignment
NBL: 145’
NBR: 100’
SBL: 215’
SBR: 100’
EBL: 35’
EBR: 160’
WBL: 450’
WBR: 105’
Dublin Boulevard & Commercial Access
The commercial access to the advanced manufacturing land uses is assumed to connect development parcels north and south of Dublin Boulevard at approximately the half-way point between Fallon Road and Croak Road. Based on our forecasts and operations analysis, the lane configuration and turn storage 686
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 47
for this intersection is shown below. The queue for the northbound left turn lane may be reduced should an internal connection between the advanced manufacturing land uses and Fallon Gateway be provided.

Commercial Access (N/S) & Dublin
Boulevard (E/W) Proposed Lane
Assignment
NBL: 545’
NBR: N/A*
SBL: 95’
SBR: 365’
EBL: 270’
EBR: 415’
WBL: 100’
WBR: N/A*
N/A* – Right turn lane not analyzed for this movement
Dublin Boulevard & Croak Road
Croak Road south of Dublin Boulevard would provide access to the advanced manufacturing land uses located south of Dublin Boulevard. The assumed lane configuration for this intersection and the estimated minimum queue storage based on cumulative conditions forecasts are shown below.

Croak Road (N/S) & Dublin Boulevard
(E/W) Proposed Lane Assignment
NBL: 365’
NBR: N/A*
SBL: 120’
SBR: 285’
EBL: 210’
EBR: 120’
WBL: 380’
WBR: 55’
N/A* – Right turn lane not analyzed for this movement
687
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 48
Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps
This intersection represents the primary freeway access intersection for the Project. This results in a degradation of intersection operations for both the AM and PM peak hours. In the AM peak hours, the Project contributes a large volume to the northbound thorough volume (almost 860 vehicles) which are coming from either the eastbound off-ramp or from south of the interchange along El Charro Road for traffic coming from Pleasanton. The reverse is happening in the PM peak hour with the Project adding almost 660 vehicles to the westbound on-ramp and about 300 traveling through the interchange to El Charro Road. The net effect is LOS F operations with the Project.

This intersection has plans to be improved in the future. However, the funding of these improvements is unclear and Kittelson decided on a conservative analysis where the interchange remains under its existing configuration. Based on the Project’s effect on the intersection, Kittelson recommends any improvements to the interchange should include at least two northbound through lanes. Adding the additional northbound lane to the existing configuration was found to improve the operations of the westbound ramp terminal intersection to LOS D in both the AM and PM peak hours. It is unlikely this can be achieved without replacing the bridge over I-580 in order to add extra lanes. Therefore, the city should consider requesting a fair share contribution to upgrade the interchange to its ultimate configuration. 95th Percentile Queue Reduction Recommendations
 Hacienda Drive & Dublin Boulevard (#1)
o Given the queue is only projected to exceed the available storage by 5 feet in 2040 with the Project, no recommendations are proposed at this intersection.  Tassajara Road & Central Parkway (#2)
o Due to limited ROW and since the queue storage already exceeds 200 feet, lengthening of the turn lane is not recommended. Kittelson recommends the Project be conditioned to update the signal timing at this location to reduce the EBR queue to the extent feasible.
 Tassajara Road & Dublin Boulevard (#3)
o Future forecasts call for a substantial increase for the NBR turn movement at this intersection. A development in the SE corner of this intersection is in the entitlements stage and is anticipated to construct the second NB right turn lane.  Santa Rita Rd & I-580 EB Ramps/Pimlico Dr (#5)
o Limited ROW prevents the extension of the SBL turn pocket or the addition of a second lane. Therefore, it is recommended the Project be conditioned to implement a signal timing improvement project to reduce the SBL turn lane queue to the extent feasible.  Fallon Road & Positano Parkway (#7)
o The queue for the NBR is projected to only exceed the available storage by 10 feet under cumulative plus project conditions. Since this is a future projection and the increase is less than one vehicle length, no improvements at this intersection are recommended.  Fallon Road & Central Parkway (#8)
o There is limited ROW to extend the WBL turn lanes at this intersection and only the nearterm condition was found to exceed the available storage. Therefore, it is recommended 688
April 3, 2024
Local Transportation Analysis Dublin Fallon 580 Project Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Page 49
the Project be conditioned to implement a signal timing improvement project at this intersection to reduce the WBL turn lane queue to the extent feasible.  Fallon Road & Dublin Boulevard (#9)
o As noted in the operations recommendations above, there is little that can be done at this intersection other than reduce the Project’s trip generation since it is assumed to already operated with three left turn lanes. Therefore, the TDM measures such as long-term bicycle lockers, a shuttle service to the nearest BART station, carpool pairing, and vanpool services should be considered. Once a more detailed site plan is established, an effective TDM plan can be developed.
 Fallon Road & I-580 WB Ramps (#11)
o The Fallon Road and I-580 interchange is proposed to be improved in the future. The Project should make a fair share contribution to replacing the interchange to reduce the effect of the SBR turn lane queues under cumulative conditions.  Airway Boulevard & N. Canyons Parkway (#16)
o Due to limited ROW, the queue effect occurring under cumulative conditions, and since the intersection is being improved as part of the Dublin Boulevard extension, it is recommended the Dublin Boulevard extension Project reduce queues to the extent feasible as part of the final signal timing plans for the intersection. No recommendations are proposed for the Project’s conditions of approval.
689
Appendix A: Raw Counts
690
Dublin Fallon 580 Project
CEQA Addendum
April 8,2024
Planning Application Number: PLPA-2023-00033
$WWDFKPHQW
691
Dublin Fallon 580 Project
CEQA Addendum
April 8, 2024
Project Overview
This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist.

The subject of this Initial Study is the Dublin Fallon 580 Development project, which includes the potential development of General Commercial/Campus Office (GC/CO), Open Space (OS), Parks/Public Recreation (P/PR), and Medium High (MH) Density Residential uses on approximately 192-acres in eastern Dublin within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) area and Fallon Village project site. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a General Plan/Specific Plan Amendment to eliminate the Public/Semi-Public (P/SP) land use designation on the project site and amend the land use designation on 42.6 +/- acres from OS to P/PR, a Stage 1 Development Plan amendment, a Stage 2 Development Plan for the residential parcels, and a Development Agreement. The project applicant has also submitted a Large Lot Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the 192-acre site into 11 parcels to accommodate proposed development of up to 238 residential units and up to 3,299,670-square feet of GC/CO uses. Additionally, the project applicant has submitted two Small Lot Vesting Tentative Tract Maps (VTTMs) for development of the MH Density Residential uses.

Prior CEQA Analysis
Prior CEQA analysis includes: 1) the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (1993); 2) the East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002); and 3) the Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005). Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs” or “previous CEQA findings,” and are described below.

Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR (1993) The Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan EIR and an addendum (Eastern Dublin EIR) were certified by the City Council on August 22, 1994. This EIR analyzed General Plan Amendments affecting a 6,920-acre area and the adoption of the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP), which encompassed a 3,328-acre area and provides a comprehensive planning framework for future development in Eastern Dublin. The area considered in this EIR included 692
the project site within the General Plan Amendment area. The Eastern Dublin EIR evaluated the following impacts:
Land Use
Population, Employment, and Housing
Traffic and Circulation
Community Services and Facilities
Sewer, Water, and Storm Drainage
Soils, Geology, and Seismicity
Biological Resources
Visual Resources
Cultural Resources
Noise
Air Quality
Fiscal Considerations
The Eastern Dublin EIR identified the following significant and unavoidable impacts:
Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space land
Cumulative traffic
Extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric, and telephone service)
Consumption of non-renewable natural resources
Increases in energy uses through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of the water distribution system
Inducement of substantial growth and concentration of population Earthquake ground shaking
Loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitat
Regional air quality
Noise
Alteration of visual character
The City adopted a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, which includes mitigation measures and a monitoring plan that continues to apply to development in eastern Dublin. The City Council also adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53–93) in connection with their certification of the Eastern Dublin EIR.
693
East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002)
In 2002, the City approved an annexation, pre-zoning, and related PD-Planned Development District Stage I Development Plan for the East Dublin Properties area (same area later named “Fallon Village”). The East Dublin Properties project site consists of 1,132 acres within the EDSP area and includes in its entirety the 192-acre GH PacVest Property. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to determine if the East Dublin Properties project required additional environmental review beyond that analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR. The IS found that many of the anticipated impacts of the East Dublin Properties project were adequately addressed in the Eastern Dublin EIR given: 1) the comprehensive planning for the development area; 2) the Eastern Dublin EIR’s analysis of buildout under the EDSP land use designations and policies; 3) the long-term 20-30 year focus of the EDSP and the Eastern Dublin EIR; 4) the East Dublin Properties project was specifically contemplated in the Eastern Dublin EIR; and 5) the East Dublin Properties project consisted of the same land uses analyzed in the Eastern Dublin EIR.

Although the IS concluded that the Eastern Dublin EIR adequately analyzed most of the potential environmental impacts of the East Dublin Properties project, it also identified the potential for new significant impacts or substantially intensified impacts beyond those previously analyzed. As a result, the Eastern Dublin EIR was updated and supplemented by the Programmatic East Dublin Properties Stage I Development Plan and Annexation Supplemental EIR (2002 Supplemental EIR), which updated the analyses of agricultural resources, biology, air quality, noise, traffic and circulation, schools, and utilities.

In certifying the 2002 Supplemental EIR, the City adopted a Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 40-02) for the following impacts:
Exceedance of Bay Area Air Quality Management District air quality standards Cumulative loss/degradation of sensitive habitats
Cumulative traffic operations at several intersections, including Dougherty Road/Dublin Boulevard, Hacienda Drive/Dublin Boulevard, and Fallon Road/Dublin Boulevard
Freeway operations on Interstate 580 (I-580) and I-680 These mitigation measures continue to apply to development in eastern Dublin, including the project site.

Fallon Village Supplemental EIR (2005)
In 2005, the City of Dublin considered additional approvals for the 1,132-acre Fallon Village area. These requested approvals had three components:

1. Amendments to the General Plan and EDSP to include the entire 1,132-acre Fallon Village area and to reflect changes to the land use designations on the site; 694

2. Revisions to the 2002 approval of the Planned Development Rezone with a Stage I Development Plan to increase the number of dwellings units by 582 to a total of 3,108 units and increase non-residential uses from 1,081,725 square feet to 2,503,175 square feet of commercial and office uses; and

3. A Stage 2 Development Plan, Vesting Tentative Map, Development Agreement, and Lot Line Adjustment for the development of the northernly 488 acres of the Fallon Village area to allow 1,078 dwelling units, a school, parks, and associated use.

The City approved all three components of the Fallon Village project.

On December 6, 2005, the City certified the Final Supplemental Fallon Village Project Environmental Impact Report (2005 Supplemental EIR) that analyzed the new uses and revisions to the previous approvals for the Fallon Village project.

The 2005 Supplemental EIR identified potentially significant environmental impacts and related mitigation measures. The City adopted a Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program for this approval that continues to apply to development in the Fallon Village area, including the project site. In addition, as part of Resolution No. 222-05, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the following significant and unavoidable impacts: traffic impact to Dublin Boulevard/Dougherty Road intersection, cumulative impacts to local roadways, consistent with the Alameda County Congestion Management Plan, demolition of the Fallon Ranch House and an increase in regional emissions beyond Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) thresholds.

The City Intended this 2005 Supplemental EIR to be used by state or regional agencies in their review of permits required for development in the Fallon Village area (e.g., California Department of Fish and Wildlife Streambed Alteration Agreements, California Endangered Species Act permits, Water Quality Certification or waiver by the Regional Water Quality Control Board under the Clean Water Act) (see, Draft 2005 Supplemental EIR, p. 27).

Proposed CEQA Analysis in this Document
The proposed project is generally based on the land use designations established by the City of Dublin’s General Plan and EDSP. This Initial Study relies on the EDSP EIRs which collectively evaluated the development of more than 3,300 acres in the eastern part of the City.

The City prepared a CEQA analysis using the City’s Initial Study Checklist, April 8, 2024, incorporated herein by reference, to assess whether any further environmental review is required for the proposed project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City determined, based on substantial evidence, that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required for the project and an Addendum to the EDSP EIRs is the appropriate CEQA review per the following:
695
No Subsequent Review is Required per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 identifies the conditions requiring subsequent environmental review. After a review of these conditions, the City determined that no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required for this project. This is based on the following analysis:
a) Are there substantial changes to the project involving new or more severe significant impacts?
There are no substantial changes to the project as analyzed in the EDSP EIRs. The proposed project would maintain all existing land uses and conform to all development regulations except for an increase in floor area ratio (FAR) to 0.60 for the uses in the GC/CO parcels. As demonstrated in the Initial Study, the project does not include substantial changes to the project analyzed under the EDSP EIRs, will not result in additional significant impacts, and no additional mitigation measures are required. b) Are there substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken involving new or more severe significant impacts?
There are no substantial changes to the circumstances assumed in the EDSP EIRs that would result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts from the project than those previously identified in the EDSP EIRs. As described for each CEQA topic in the Initial Study, the existing environmental conditions or circumstances in and around the project site have not changed such that implementation of the proposed project would result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of environmental effects identified in the EDSP EIRs. Although the EDSP area continues to develop around the project site, the site remains undeveloped grazing land. This is documented in the Initial Study.
c) Is there new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the previous EIR that shows the project will have a significant effect not addressed in the previous EIR; or previous effects are more severe than previously analyzed; or, previously infeasible mitigation measures are now feasible but the applicant declined to adopt them; or mitigation measures considerably different from those in the previous EIR would substantially reduce significant effects but the applicant declines to adopt them?
As documented in the Initial Study, there is no new information showing a new or more severe significant effect beyond those identified in the EDSP EIRs. Similarly, the Initial Study documents found that there are no new or different feasible mitigation measures or alternatives to reduce significant effects of the project which the applicant declines to adopt. All previously adopted mitigations continue to apply to the project. The EDSP EIRs adequately describe the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed development on portions of the EDSP area.
d) If no subsequent EIR-level review is required, should a subsequent negative declaration be prepared?
696
No subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required because there are no significant impacts of the project beyond those identified in the EDSP EIRs and no other standards for supplemental review under CEQA are met, as documented in the Initial Study.

Conclusion
This Addendum is prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 based on the attached Initial Study. Through the adoption of this Addendum and related Initial Study, the City determines that the proposed project does not require a subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration under CEQA Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163.

The City further determines that the EDSP EIRs adequately address the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project.

As provided in Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, this Addendum need not be circulated for public review, but shall be considered with the prior environmental documents before making a decision on this project.

The Initial Study and EDSP EIRs are incorporated herein by reference and are available for public review during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., in the Community Development Department, Dublin City Hall, 100 Civic Plaza, Dublin CA.

697
Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Environmental Checklist/Initial Study
April 8, 2024
PLPA-2023-00000

698
This page intentionally left blank.
699
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Table of Contents | Page i
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Background & Project Description 2
Environmental Setting 12
Environmental Checklist 14
Determination 17
Explanation of Environmental Checklist Responses 18
Appendices
A CalEEMod Output Sheets
B Model Snap Shots
C Biological Resources Report
D Special-Status Plant Survey Report
E Listed Large Branchiopod Wet Season Survey 90-Day Report F Arborist Report
G CEQA Bio Mitigation Measures Status and Implementation Plan H Geotechnical Investigation
I Noise Monitoring Sheets
J Dublin Fallon 580 Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum

700
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Table of Contents | Page ii
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location ....................................................................................................... 184 Figure 2: Aerial Photograph of the Project Site and Surrounding Land Uses ........................... 185 Figure 3: Proposed Parcel Layout ............................................................................................ 186 Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Land Use ............................................................................... 187 Figure 5: Residential Site Plan ................................................................................................. 188 Figure 6: Conceptual Circulation Plan ..................................................................................... 189 Figure 7: Preliminary Utility Plan ............................................................................................ 190 Figure 8: Noise Monitoring Locations ..................................................................................... 191 Note: All figures are included at the end of the document.

701
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Table of Contents | Page iii
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
List of Tables
Table A: Proposed Development .................................................................................................6 Table B: Proposed Uses Compared to Existing Approved Uses ....................................................7 Table C: Proposed Residential Uses Compared to Existing Approved Uses ..................................8 Table D: Project Construction Emissions in Pounds Per Day ......................................................39 Table E: Project Operational Emissions......................................................................................42 Table F: Unmitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors .45 Table G: Mitigated Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction to Off-Site Receptors .....46 Table H: Typical Maximum Construction Equipment Noise Levels (Lmax) ................................ 130 Table I: Equipment Noise by Construction Phase ..................................................................... 131 Table J: Construction Vibration Damage Criteria ..................................................................... 134 Table K: Vibration Source Amplitudes for Construction Equipment ......................................... 135 Table L: Existing Parks in the Vicinity of the Project Site .......................................................... 143 Table M: Existing Transit Facilities ........................................................................................... 156 Table N: Estimated Trip Generation for 580 Fallon based on 2022 Proposed Project ............... 163 Table O: Estimated Trip Generation for 580 Fallon Based on Fallon Village SEIR ...................... 163 702
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Initial Study | Page 1
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Initial Study
Introduction
This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and assesses the potential environmental impacts of implementing the proposed project described below. The Initial Study consists of a completed environmental checklist and a brief explanation of the environmental topics addressed in the checklist.

Because the proposed project is generally based on the land use designations established by the City of Dublin General Plan and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, this Initial Study relies on the Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (Eastern Dublin EIR), 1 which evaluated the development of over 3,300 acres in the eastern part of the City. The Eastern Dublin EIR was certified by the City in 1993. Two addenda to the Eastern Dublin EIR were subsequently adopted by the City.

In 2002, a Supplemental EIR (2002 SEIR)2
to the Eastern Dublin EIR was prepared for the East
Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation project (same area later named “Fallon Village”). The 2002 SEIR was certified by the City in 2002. The 2002 SEIR analyzed annexation of approximately 1,120 acres in eastern Dublin to the City and the Dublin San Ramon Services District, as well as a Prezoning and related PD-Planned Development District Stage 1 Development Plan. The land uses and intensities evaluated in the 2002 SEIR were consistent with both the Dublin General Plan and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan and included development of up to 2,526 residential units, 581,090 square feet of commercial use, 840,360 square feet of industrial space, a junior high school, elementary school, parks and open space uses.

In 2005, the City prepared a Supplemental EIR for the Fallon Village Project (Fallon Village SEIR)3 to amend the previous entitlements to include approximately 1,134 acres within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan, revise the Stage 1 Development Plan (PD-1) to modify the existing land uses and roadway alignments established in 2002, and approve a Stage 2 Development Plan for 1 Dublin, City of. 1992. Final Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 91103064, Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. December. 2
Dublin, City of. 2002. Final Revised Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2001052114, East Dublin Properties Stage 1 Development Plan and Annexation. March. 3 Dublin, City of. 2005. Fallon Village Project, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2005062010. November.
703
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Initial Study | Page 2
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
the northern portion of the Fallon Village project area. The Fallon Village Project allowed for development of up to 3,108 residential units, up to 2,503,175 square feet of commercial, office, light industrial and mixed-use development, two elementary school sites, parks, utility extensions and open spaces within the 1,134-acre site. The City certified the Fallon Village SEIR in December 2005.

The subject of this Initial Study is the Dublin Fallon 580 project, which includes development of General Commercial/Campus Office (GC/CO), Open Space (OS), Parks/Public Recreation (P/PR), and Medium High (MH) Density Residential uses on approximately 192-acres in eastern Dublin within the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan area and Fallon Village project site.

Background & Project Description
Project Title
Dublin Fallon 580
Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Dublin
Community Development Department
100 Civic Plaza
Dublin, CA 94568
Contact Person and Phone Number
Crystal De Castro
Senior Planner
Phone: 925-833-6610
[email protected]
Project Location
The approximately 192-acre project site is located in the eastern portion of Dublin (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APN]: 905-0001-006-03; 985-0027-002; 985-0027-005; 985-0027-004). The project site is located east of Fallon Road and north of Interstate 580 (I-580). Croak Road divides the project site from north to south and the future Dublin Boulevard Extension Project bisects the project site from west to east. Figures 1 and 2 provide the regional location and aerial photograph of the project site and surrounding land uses, respectively. 704
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Initial Study | Page 3
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
Project Applicant’s/Sponsor’s Name and Address

GH PACVEST, LLC
2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 5115
Houston, TX 77056
General Plan Designation
Medium High Density Residential (13.7 acres), General Commercial/Campus Office ( 126.3 acres), Parks/Public Recreation (P/PR) - (7.2 acres), Open Space (44.9 acres), and Public/SemiPublic (2.5 acres) Zoning
Planned Development (PD) Ordinance No. 32-05 and Ordinance No. 13-08 Project Description
Project Background and Prior Environmental Review
The project is included in three previous CEQA documents, as noted below. Collectively, these three environmental review documents are referred to as the “EDSP EIRs” or “previous CEQA findings.”
Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment and Eastern Dublin Specific Plan Program EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 1991103064). A Program EIR for the Eastern Dublin General Plan Amendment (Eastern Extended Planning Area) and the Eastern Dublin Specific Plan (EDSP) was certified by the City Council in 1993 by Resolution No. 51-93. This document and its related addenda collectively are referred to as the Eastern Dublin EIR. The Eastern Dublin EIR evaluated the following impacts:
Land Use
Population, Employment and Housing
Traffic and Circulation
Community Services and Facilities
Sewer, Water and Storm Drainage
Soils, Geology and Seismicity
Biological Resources
Visual Resources
Cultural Resources
Noise
Air Quality
705
City of Dublin Dublin Fallon 580 Project
Initial Study | Page 4
580Fallon_FinalDraftIS.docx (4/8/24)
Fiscal Considerations
The City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Resolution No. 53–93) for the following significant and unavoidable impacts:
Cumulative loss of agriculture and open space land
Cumulative traffic
Extension of certain community facilities (natural gas, electric and telephone service) Consumption of non-renewable natural resources
Increases in energy uses through increased water treatment and disposal and through operation of the water distribution system
Inducement of substantial growth and concentration of population Earthquake ground shaking
Loss or degradation of botanically sensitive habitat
Regional air quality
Noise
Alteration of visual character
The Eastern Dublin EIR was challenged in court and the court upheld the adequacy of the EIR.

Dublin City CouncilJuly 16, 2024

Dublin City Council
July 16, 2024