Compliance with All Ethics Requirements Regarding Independence The engagement team, others in our firm, as appropriate, and our firm, have complied with all relevant ethical requirements regarding independence.
Significant Risks Identified
We have identified the following significant risks:
Risk of Management Override of Internal Controls – A risk of management override of internal controls exists at any entity where management can change or decide not to perform that entity’s internal controls.
Revenue Recognition Risk – Errors in revenue recognition can affect bond covenant ratios and the net position of the City.
Qualitative Aspects of the Entity’s Significant Accounting Practices Significant Accounting Policies
Management has the responsibility to select and use appropriate accounting policies. A summary of the significant accounting policies adopted by the City is included in Note 1 to the financial statements.
There have been no initial selection of accounting policies and no changes in significant accounting policies or their application during the year ended June 30, 2025. No matters have come to our attention that would require us, under professional standards, to inform you about (1) the methods used to account for significant unusual transactions and (2) the effect of significant accounting policies in controversial or emerging areas for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.
Significant Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures Accounting estimates and related disclosures are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management’s current judgments. Those judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from management’s current judgments.
The most sensitive accounting estimates affecting the financial statements are valuations, capital asset depreciation and useful life, and pension and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) plan assumptions.
286
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Management’s estimate of investment valuations, capital assets depreciation and useful life, and pension and OPEB plan assumptions are based on historical useful lives of such assets, actuarial assumptions, and the City’s investment custodians, respectively. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimate of investment valuations, capital assets depreciation and useful life, and pension and OPEB plan assumptions and determined that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole and in relation to the applicable opinion units.
Financial Statement Disclosures
Certain financial statement disclosures involve significant judgment and are particularly sensitive because of their significance to financial statement users. The most sensitive disclosures affecting the City’s financial statements relate to:
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Investments
Long-term Debt
Capital Assets
Employee Retirement Plans
Other Post-Employment Benefits
Commitments and Contingencies
Restatements
Significant Difficulties Encountered during the Audit
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management relating to the performance of the audit.
Uncorrected and Corrected Misstatements
For purposes of this communication, professional standards also require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those that we believe are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Further, professional standards require us to also communicate the effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods on the relevant classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures, and the financial statements as a whole and each applicable opinion unit. Uncorrected misstatements or matters underlying those uncorrected misstatements could potentially cause future-period financial statements to be materially misstated, even though the uncorrected misstatements are immaterial to the financial statements currently under audit.
In addition, professional standards require us to communicate to you all material, corrected misstatements that were brought to the attention of management as a result of our audit procedures.
The material misstatements identified as a result of our audit procedures and corrected by management are included as an attachment to this letter (“Exhibit A”). 287
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Disagreements with Management
For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, which could be significant to the City’s financial statements or the auditor’s report. No such disagreements arose during the course of the audit.
Representations Requested from Management
We have requested certain written representations from management, which are included in the attached letter dated December 10, 2025.
Management’s Consultations with Other Accountants
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters. Management informed us that, and to our knowledge, there were no consultations with other accountants regarding auditing and accounting matters.
Other Significant Matters, Findings, or Issues
In the normal course of our professional association with the City, we generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, significant events or transactions that occurred during the year, operating and regulatory conditions affecting the entity, and operational plans and strategies that may affect the risks of material misstatement. None of the matters discussed resulted in a condition to our retention as the City’s auditors.
Required Supplementary Information
We applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
Supplementary Information
We were engaged to report on the combining and individual nonmajor fund statements and budgetary comparison schedules for the major capital project funds and nonmajor governmental funds (supplementary information) which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the 288
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.
Other Information Included in the Annual Report
Pursuant to professional standards, our responsibility as auditors for the introductory and statistical sections, whether financial or nonfinancial, included in the City’s annual report, does not extend beyond the information identified in the audit report, and we are not required to perform any procedures to corroborate such other information. However, in accordance with such standards, we have read the information and considered whether such information, or the manner of its presentation, was materially inconsistent with its presentation in the financial statements.
Our responsibility also includes communicating to you any information which we believe is a material misstatement of fact. Nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that such information, or its manner of presentation, is materially inconsistent with the information, or manner of its presentation, appearing in the financial statements.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council, and management of the City and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
289
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Exhibit A
Co
rrected Misstatements:
3600-9610-73103 Improvements Not Building 1,277,639.60
3600-0000-21101 Accounts Payable 1,213,757.62
3600-0000-23102 Contract Payable Retention 63,881.98
Total 1,277,639.60 1,277,639.60
1001-0000-11101 Operating Account 11,227,600.00
2922-0000-47305 Other Agency Grants 1,450,000.00
2922-0000-47305 Other Agency Grants 11,227,600.00
1001-0000-12101 Accounts Receivable 11,227,600.00
2922-0000-11101 Operating Account 11,227,600.00
2922-0000-26000 Deferred Revenue 1,450,000.00
Total 23,905,200.00 23,905,200.00
3500-0000-31201 Restricted 2,045,624.00
3500-9510-73103 Improvements Not Building 2,045,624.00
Total 2,045,624.00 2,045,624.00
Audit Adjusting Journal Entries JE # 1
To move amount for Street Projects progress payment back into accounts payable at June 30, 2025.
Audit Adjusting Journal Entries JE # 2
To reclassify TVTC Grant to deferred and to reverse accounts receivable and revenues related to TVTC grant due to no expenditures incurred for the grant in current year.
Audit Adjusting Journal Entries JE # 3
To record prior period adjustment for Don Biddle Community Park expenditures incurred in FY2024 but recorded in FY2025.
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
City of Dublin
Measure B Funds
Dublin, California
Financial Statements and
Independent Auditor’s Reports
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Attachment 4
298
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure B Funds Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report .............................................................................................................................. 1 Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet ............................................................................................................... ........................................... 5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances .................................................................................................. ........................... 6 Notes to Financial Statements .............................................................................................................................. 7 Supplementary Information:
Budgets and Budgetary Accounting ................................................................................................................. 12 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual:
Measure B – ACTC Streets and Roads Special Revenue Fund .................................................................. 13 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual:
Measure B – ACTC Bikes and Pedestrians Special Revenue Fund ........................................................... 14 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ....................................................................................................................... 15 Report on Compliance and on Internal Control
over Compliance for Measure B ....................................................................................................................... 17 299
This page intentionally left blank
300
INDE
PENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the financial statements of the Measure B Funds (Measure B Funds) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the Measure B Funds of the City, as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Measure B Funds of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Measure B Funds and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City as of June 30, 2025, and changes in its financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. 301
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements The City’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Measure B Funds’ ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Measure B Funds’ internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Measure B Funds’ ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control–related matters that we identified during the audit.
2 302
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Measure B Funds’ financial statements. The budgetary comparison information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements.
The budgetary comparison information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, budgetary information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards , we have also issued our report dated December 10, 2025 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tes
ts of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
3 303
This page intentionally left blank
4 304
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission- Measure B Funds Balance Sheet
June 30, 2025
ACTC ACTC
Streets and Bikes and
Roads Pedestrians Total
ASSETS:
Cash and investments -$
1,015$
1,015$
Total assets -$
1,015$
1,015$
FUND BALANCES:
Restricted -$
1,015$
1,015$
Total fund balances -$
1,015$
1,015$
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
5 305
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission- Measure B Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances For the year ended June 30, 2025
ACTC ACTC
Streets and Bikes and
Roads Pedestrians Total
REVENUES:
Interest income -$
35$
35$
Total revenues - 35 35
REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
EXPENDITURES - 35 35
FUND BALANCES:
Beginning of year - 980 980
End of year -$ 1,015$ 1,015$
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
6 306
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure B Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Reporting Entity
All transactions of the Alameda County Transport ation Commission – Measure B Funds (Measure B Funds) of the City of Dublin, Califor
nia (City), are included as a separate special revenue fund in the basic financial statements of the City. Measure B Funds are used to account for the City’s share of re venues earned and
expenditures incurred under the City’s local streets and roads, and bike and pedestrian programs.
The accompanying financial statements are for Measure B Funds only and are not intended to fairly present the financial position or results of operations of the City.
B. Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus
The accompanying fin
ancial statements are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Revenues are generally recorded when mea
surable and available, and expenditures are recorded when the related liabilities are incurred.
The accounting and fina
ncial reporting treatment app lied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmenta
l funds are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus, wherein only current assets and current liabil
ities generally are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of governmental funds present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (ex
penditures and other financing uses) in net current assets.
C. Fund Accou
nting
The operations of the
Measure B Funds are accounted for in separate special revenue funds. The funds are separate accounting entities with a set of se lf-balancing accounts which comprise their assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenses.
D. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principl es generally accepted in the United States of America requires manage
ment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reportin g period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
2. MEASURE B FUNDS
Under Measure B, approved by the voters of Alam eda County in 1986 (ACTA Old Measure B) and in 2000, (ACTC Measure B), the City receives a portion of the pr oceeds of an additional one-half cent sales tax to be used for transportation-related expenditures. This me asure was adopted with the intention that the funds generated by the additional sales tax will not fund expe nditures previously paid fo r by property taxes but, rather, would be used for additional projects and programs.
Major projects funded by Measure B were as follows:
Streets and Roads Program – To improve, repair, and overlay city streets.
Bike and Pedestrian Program – To provide sidewalk and American Disability Act (ADA) improvements and to implement the bikeway network.
7 307
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure B Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Measure B funds are pooled with the City’s cash and investments in order to generate optimum interest income.
The City pools its available cash for investment pu rposes. The City’s cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and short-term investments with original maturity of three months or less from date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are combined with investments and displayed as Cash and Investments.
Measure B Funds had the following cash and investments at June 30, 2025:
Cash and Investments $ 1,105
A. Investments
Under the provisions of the City’s investment po licy, and in accordance wi th Ca lifornia Government Code, the fo
llowing investments are authorized:
In accordan
ce with GASB Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools, investments were stated at fair value using the aggregate method in all funds and component units. The City’s investments are carried at fair market value as required by generally accepted accounting principles. The City accounts fo r all changes in fair value that occurred during the year and are reflected in the fund balance for the fiscal year. These investment value changes are unrealized since the City’s policy is to generally hold and buy investments until maturity dates.
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum Credit
Quality
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Maximum
Investment In
One Issuer
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years A-1 30% 20%
Bankers' Acceptance 180 days A-1 40% 20% of Portfolio
U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes 10 years N/A No Limit No Limit U.S. Government Agency Securities 10 years N/A 25% for callable 35% California Asset Management Program N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Commercial Paper 270 days A-1 25% 20% of Portfolio
Time Certificates of Deposit 1 year N/A 10% No Limit
State Local Agency Investment Fund N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Asset-Backed Securities 5 years AA 20% 5%
Medium-Term Notes 5 years A 30% 5%
Mutual Funds N/A AAA 20% 10%
Money Market Funds N/A AAA 20% No Limit
Municipal Securities 10 years A No Limit 5%
Supranationals 5 years AA 30% 10%
8 308
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure B Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS, Co ntinued
B. Risk Di
sclosures
Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the fluctuation in fair value of investments due to changes in interest rates. The City’s exposure to losses caused by rising interest rates is minimized by limiting the average maturity of the City’s investment not to exceed five years.
Credit Risk – Credit risk
is the risk of loss of value of a security or investment due to downgrad e of its rating due to a change in the ability of the issuer to fulfill its debt obligation. With the exception of U.S.
Treasury securities and
authorized pools, no more than 50% of the City ’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution to reduce the City’s exposure to credit risks.
Custodial Credit Risk – The c
ustodial credit risk for an investment is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that ar
e in the possession of an outside party. None of the City’s investments were subject to custodial credit risk.
C. Local Agency Investmen
t Fund
The City is a voluntary
participant in the Local Agen cy Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California.
The City’s investments with LAIF at June 30, 2025 include a portion of the pool funds invested in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities. These investments include the following:
Structured Notes
– are debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturi ty) depend upon one or more indices and/or have embedded forwards or options.
Asset
-Backed Securities – the bulk of which are mortgage-backed securities, entitle their purchasers to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of asse ts such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mort
gages (such as Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) or credit card receivables.
As of June 30, 20
25, the City invested in LAIF, which had invested 3.81% of the pool investment funds in Struct
ured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities as comp ared to 3.00% in the previous year. The LAIF fair value factor
of 1.001198310 was used to calculate the fair value of the investments in LAIF.
4. COM
MITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The City participates in several grant programs. Th ese programs are subject to further examination by the grantors and the amount, if any, of expenditures whic h may be disallowed by the granting agencies cannot be determined at this time. The City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. 9 309
This page intentionally left blank
10 310
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
11 311
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure B Funds Supplementary Information
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING
The City follows these
procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the basic financial statements:
Prior to June 30 the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following July 1. The operating budget includes proposed expendit ures and th
e means of financing them.
The public is given an opportunity to comment on the budget at a noticed City Council meeting. Prior to July 1, the
budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution. During the
fiscal year, the City Manager is au thorized to transfer budgeted amounts between line items, provided that
the transfer is within the same fund, regardless of the specific department activity. This include the authority t
o transfer from the General Fund budgeted contingency amounts that
are approved by the City Council during th e budget adoption. The City Manag er is authorized to increase r
evenue and expenditure budget for various departmental functions, when the net budget impact is zero.
The City Manager is a
uthorized to increase the a ppropriations for the following fiscal year in an amount not to exceed the amount of funds encumbered or designated by the City Manager as needed for ex
penses that did not occur prior to the year-end, but are expected to be expended in the next year consistent w
ith the original purpose.
As part of the annual Budget adoption the Ci ty Council authorizes the carry-over unexpend ed ca
pital project appropriations, for those projects where work and expenditures will continue in the subsequent year.
Formal budgetary integration is employed as a managemen t control device during the year for the general fund, special revenue funds and capital projects funds. Budgets for the general,
special revenue and capital projects funds are adopted on a basis consis tent with general
ly accepted accounting principles in the United States. 12 312
City of Dublin
Supplementary Information, Continued
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure B - ACTC Streets and Roads
Variance with
Final Budget
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Ne gative)
REVENUES:
Interest income 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ (10,000)$
Total revenues 10,000 10,000 - (10,000)
EXPENDITURES:
Streets and roads - 28,091 - 28,091
Total expenditures - 28,091 - 28,091
Net change in fund balance 10,000$ (18,091)$ - 18,091$ FUND BALANCE:
Beginning of year -
End of year -$
Budgeted Amounts
For the year ended June 30, 2025
13 313
City of Dublin
Supplementary Information, Continued
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure B - ACTC Bikes and Pedestrians
Variance with
Final Budget
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Ne gative)
REVENUES:
Interest income 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 35 $ (3,965)$
Total revenues 4,000 4,000 35 (3,965)
Net change in fund balance 4,000$ 4,000$ 35 (3,965)$ FUND BALANCE:
Beginning of year 980
End of year 1,015$
Budgeted Amounts
For the year ended June 30, 2025
14 314
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE
AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Measure B Funds (Measure B Funds) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 10, 2025.
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.
315
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Measure B Funds’ financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statement. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
16 316
REPO
RT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER COMPLIANCE FOR MEASURE B
Independent Auditor’s Report
To th
e Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance for Measure B
Opinion on Compliance for Measure B
We have audited City of Dublin’s (City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission that could have a direct and material effect on its Measure B 2000 Funds (Measure B Funds) for the year ended June 30, 2025.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its Measure B Funds for the year ended June 30, 2025.
Basis for Opinion on Measure B
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States ( Government Auditing Standards); and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission. Our responsibilities under those standards and are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the City’s Measure B Funds.
Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Measure B Funds compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s Measure B Funds.
317
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the Measure B Fund’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the Measure B Fund’s compliance with the requirements of the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the Measure B Funds’ compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control over Compliance
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined below. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.
18 318
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
19 319
City of Dublin
Measure BB Funds
Dublin, California
Financial Statements and
Independent Auditor’s Reports
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Attachment 5
320
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure BB Funds Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................................. 1 Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet ................................................................................................................ ........................................... 5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances .................................................................................................... ............................. 6 Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................... 7 Supplementary Information:
Budgets and Budgetary Accounting .................................................................................................................. 12 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual:
Measure BB – ACTC Streets and Roads Special Revenue Fund ................................................................. 13 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual:
Measure BB – ACTC Bikes and Pedestrians Special Revenue Fund .......................................................... 14 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ....................................................................................................................... 15 Report on Compliance and on Internal Control
over Compliance for Measure BB .................................................................................................................... 17 321
This page intentionally left blank.
322
INDE
PENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the financial statements of the Measure BB Funds (Measure BB Funds) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the Measure BB Funds of the City, as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Measure BB Funds of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Measure BB Funds and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City as of June 30, 2025, and changes in its financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. 323
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements The City’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Measure BB Funds’ ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Measure BB Funds’ internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Measure BB Funds’ ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control–related matters that we identified during the audit.
2 324
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Measure BB Funds’ financial statements. The budgetary comparison information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements.
The budgetary comparison information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements.
Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, budgetary information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 10, 2025 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
3 325
This page intentionally left blank.
4 326
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission - Measure BB Funds Balance Sheet
June 30, 2025
ACTC ACTC
Streets and Bikes and
Roads Pedestrians Total
ASSETS:
Cash and investments 2,709,834$ 83,523$ 2,793,357$ Direct local distribution program receivables 253,826 86,419 340,245 Total assets 2,963,660$ 169,942$ 3,133,602$ FUND BALANCES:
Restricted 2,963,660$ 169,942$ 3,133,602$ Total fund balances 2,963,660$ 169,942$ 3,133,602$ See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
5 327
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission - Measure BB Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
ACTC ACTC
Streets and Bikes and
Roads Pedestrians Total
REVENUES:
Measure BB revenue 1,446,811$ 492,592$ 1,939,403$ Use of money and property 79,542 32,078 111,620 Total revenues 1,526,353 524,670 2,051,023
EXPENDITURES:
Bikes and pedestrians - 1,332,374 1,332,374
Streets and roads 411,622 - 411,622
Total expenditures 411,622 1,332,374 1,743,996
EXPENDITURES 1,114,731 (807,704) 307,027
FUND BALANCES:
Beginning of year 1,848,929 977,646 2,826,575
End of year 2,963,660$ 169,942$ 3,133,602$ For the year ended June 30, 2025
REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
6 328
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure BB Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Reporting Entity
All transactions of the Alameda County Transport ation Commission – Measure BB Funds (Measure BB Funds) of the City of Dublin, Califor
nia (City), are included as a separate special revenue fund in the basic financial statements of the City. Measure BB Funds are used to account for the City’s share of revenues earned and
expenditures incurred under the City’s paratransit, local streets and roads, an d bike and pedestrian p
rograms. The accompanying financial statements are for Measure BB Funds only and are not intended to
fairly present the financial position or results of operations of the City.
B. Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus
The accompanying fin
ancial statements are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Revenues are generally recorded when mea
surable and available, and expenditures are recorded when the related liabilities are incurred.
The accounting and fina
ncial reporting treatment app lied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmenta
l funds are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus, wherein only current assets and current liabil
ities generally are included on the balance sheet. Operating statements of governmental funds present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (ex
penditures and other financing uses) in net current assets.
C. Fund Accou
nting
The operations of the Measure BB Funds are accounted for i n separate special revenue funds. The funds
are separat
e accounting entities with a set of se lf-balancing accounts which comprise their assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenses.
D. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principl es generally accepted in the United States of America requires manage
ment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reportin g period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
2. MEASURE BB FUNDS
Under Measure BB, approved by the voters of Alameda County in 2014, the City receives a portion of the proceeds of an additional one-half cent sales tax to be used for transportation-related expenditures. This measure was adopted with the intention that the funds generated by the additional sales tax will not fund expenditures previously paid for by property taxes but, rather, would be used for additional projects and programs.
Major projects funded by Measure BB were as follows:
Streets and Roads Program – To improve, repair, and overlay city streets.
Bike and Pedestrian Program – To provide sidewalk and American Disability Act (ADA) improvements and to implement the bikeway network.
7 329
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure BB Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Measure BB funds are pooled with the City’s cash and investments in order to generate optimum interest income.
The City pools its available cash for investment pu rposes. The City’s cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and short-term investments with original maturity of three months or less from date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are combined with investments and displayed as Cash and Investments.
Measure BB Funds had the following cash and investments at June 30, 2025:
Cash and Investments $2,793,357
A. Investments
The City's Investment Policy and the California Gove rnment Code allow the City to invest in the following, p
rovided the credit ratings of the issuers are acceptable to the City; and approved percentages and maturities are not exceeded. Th e table below also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code, or the City's Investment Policy where the City's Investment Policy is more restrictive.
In accordan
ce with GASB Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools, investments were stated at fair value using the aggregate method in all funds and component units. The City’s investments are carried at fair market value as required by generally accepted accounting principles. The City accounts fo r all changes in fair value that occurred during the year and are reflected in the fund balance for the fiscal year. These investment value changes are unrealized since the City’s policy is to generally hold and buy investments until maturity dates.
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum Credit
Quality
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Maximum
Investment In
One Issuer
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years A-1 30% 20%
Bankers' Acceptance 180 days A-1 40% 20% of Portfolio
U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes 10 years N/A No Limit No Limit U.S. Government Agency Securities 10 years N/A 25% for callable 35% California Asset Management Program N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Commercial Paper 270 days A-1 25% 20% of Portfolio
Time Certificates of Deposit 1 year N/A 10% No Limit
State Local Agency Investment Fund N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Asset-Backed Securities 5 years AA 20% 5%
Medium-Term Notes 5 years A 30% 5%
Mutual Funds N/A AAA 20% 10%
Money Market Funds N/A AAA 20% No Limit
Municipal Securities 10 years A No Limit 5%
Supranationals 5 years AA 30% 10%
8 330
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure BB Funds Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS, Continued
B. Risk Di
sclosures
Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the fluctuation in fair value of investments due to changes in interest rates. The City’s exposure to losses caused by rising interest rates is minimized by limiting the average maturity of the City’s investment not to exceed five years.
Credit Risk – Credit risk
is the risk of loss of value of a security or investment due to downgrad e of its rating due to a change in the ability of the issuer to fulfill its debt obligation. With the exception of U.S.
Treasury securities and
authorized pools, no more than 50% of the City ’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution to reduce the City’s exposure to credit risks.
Custodial Credit Risk – The c
ustodial credit risk for an investment is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that ar
e in the possession of an outside party. None of the City’s investments were subject to custodial credit risk.
C. Local Agency Investmen
t Fund
The City is a voluntary
participant in the Local Agen cy Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California.
The City’s investments with LAIF at June 30, 2025 include a portion of the pool funds invested in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities. These investments include the following:
Structured Notes
– are debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturi ty) depend upon one or more indices and/or have embedded forwards or options.
Asset
-Backed Securities – the bulk of which are mortgage-backed securities, entitle their purchasers to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of asse ts such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mort
gages (such as Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) or credit card receivables.
As of June 30, 20
25, the City had invested in LAIF, which had invested 3.81% of the pool investment funds in Struct
ured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities as compared to 3.00% in the previous year. The LAIF fair value fa
ctor of 1.001198310 was used to calculate the fair value of the investments in LAIF.
4. DIRECT LOCAL DISTRIBUTION FROGRAM RECEIVABLES
The receivables represent the Measure BB sales tax revenues for the fiscal year received from the Alameda County Transportation Commission after June 30, 2025.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The City participates in several grant programs. Th ese programs are subject to further examination by the grantors and the amount, if any, of expenditures whic h may be disallowed by the granting agencies cannot be determined at this time. The City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. 9 331
This page intentionally left blank.
10 332
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
11 333
City of Dublin
Alameda County Transportation Commission – Measure BB Funds Supplementary Information
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. BUDGETS AND BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING
The City follows these
procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the basic financial statements:
Prior to June 30 the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following July 1. The operating budget includes proposed expendit ures and th
e means of financing them.
The public is given an opportunity to comment on the budget at a noticed City Council meeting. Prior to July 1, the
budget is legally enacted through passage of a resolution. During the
fiscal year, the City Manager is au thorized to transfer budgeted amounts between line items, provided that
the transfer is within the same fund, regardless of the specific department activity. This include the authority t
o transfer from the General Fund budgeted contingency amounts that
are approved by the City Council during th e budget adoption. The City Manag er is authorized to increase r
evenue and expenditure budget for various departmental functions, when the net budget impact is zero.
The City Manager is a
uthorized to increase the a ppropriations for the following fiscal year in an amount not to exceed the amount of funds encumbered or designated by the City Manager as needed for ex
penses that did not occur prior to the year-end, but are expected to be expended in the next year consistent w
ith the original purpose.
As part of the annual Budget adoption the Ci ty Council authorizes the carry-over unexpend ed ca
pital project appropriations, for those projects where work and expenditures will continue in the subsequent year.
Formal budgetary integration is employed as a managemen t control device during the year for the general fund, special revenue funds and capital projects funds. Budgets for the general,
special revenue and capital projects funds are adopted on a basis consis tent with general
ly accepted accounting principles in the United States. 12 334
City of Dublin
Supplementary Information, Continued
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure BB - ACTC Streets and Roads
Variance with
Final Budget
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Ne gative)
REVENUES:
Measure BB revenue 1,340,847$ 1,340,847 $ 1,446,811 $ 105,964 $ Use of money and property 17,000 17,000 79,542 62,542 Total revenues 1,357,847 1,357,847 1,526,353 168,506 EXPENDITURES:
Streets and roads 2,080,000 2,821,264 411,622 2,409,642 Total expenditures 2,080,000 2,821,264 411,622 2,409,642 Net change in fund balance (722,153)$ (1,463,417)$ 1,114,731 2,578,148$ FUND BALANCE:
Beginning of year 1,848,929
End of year 2,963,660$
Budgeted Amounts
For the year ended June 30, 2025
13 335
City of Dublin
Supplementary Information, Continued
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Measure BB - ACTC Bikes and Pedestrians
Variance with
Final Budget
Actual Positive
Original Final Amounts (Ne gative)
REVENUES:
Measure BB revenue 462,215$ 462,215$ 492,592$ 30,377$ Use of money and property 10,000 10,000 32,078 22,078 Total revenues 472,215 472,215 524,670 52,455
EXPENDITURES:
Bikes and pedestrians 948,228 1,367,837 1,332,374 35,463 Total expenditures 948,228 1,367,837 1,332,374 35,463 Net change in fund balance (476,013)$ (895,622)$ (807,704) 87,918$ FUND BALANCE:
Beginning of year 977,646
End of year 169,942$
Budgeted Amounts
For the year ended June 30, 2025
14 336
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE
AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Measure BB Funds (Measure BB Funds) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 10, 2025.
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting in relation to Measure BB Funds (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.
337
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Measure BB Funds’ financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
16 338
REPO
RT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER COMPLIANCE FOR MEASURE BB
Independent Auditor’s Report
To th
e Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance for Measure BB
Opinion on Compliance for Measure BB
We have audited City of Dublin’s (City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission that could have a direct and material effect on its Measure BB Funds (Measure BB Funds) for the year ended June 30, 2025.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its Measure BB Funds for the year ended June 30, 2025.
Basis for Opinion on Measure BB
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States ( Government Auditing Standards); and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission. Our responsibilities under those standards and are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the City’s Measure BB Funds. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Measure BB Funds compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s Measure BB Funds.
339
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the Measure BB Fund’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the Measure BB Fund’s compliance with the requirements of the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the Measure BB Funds’ compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Other Matters
Under Measure BB, approved by the voters of Alameda County in 2014, the City has received a total of 12 months of revenue from July 2024 through June 2025. The Local Street and Roads program has received $1,446,811 and the Bike and Pedestrian program has received $492,592. 18 340
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Internal Control over Compliance
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined below. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
19 341
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda
County Vehicle
Registration Fee Fund
Dublin, California
Financial Statements and
Independent Auditor’s Reports
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Attachment 6
342
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report ............................................................................................................................. 1 Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet ............................................................................................................... .......................................... 5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balance ................................................................................................................................. 6 Notes to Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................. 7 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards ..................................................................................................................... 11 Report on Compliance and Internal Control
over Compliance for Measure F ....................................................................................................................... 13 343
This page intentionally left blank.
344
INDE
PENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the financial statements of the Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund (VRF Fund) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the VRF Fund of the City, as of June 30, 2025, and the changes in financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the VRF Fund of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the VRF Fund and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City as of June 30, 2025, and changes in its financial position for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. 345
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements The City’s management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the VRF Fund’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the VRF Fund’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the VRF Fund’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control–related matters that we identified during the audit.
2 346
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 10, 2025 on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
3 347
This page intentionally left blank.
4 348
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Balance Sheet
June 30, 2025
ASSETS:
Cash and investments 183,879 $
Direct local distribution program receivables 59,689
Total assets 243,568$
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE:
Fund Balance:
Restricted 243,568
Total fund balance 243,568
Total liabilities and fund balance 243,568$
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
5 349
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance REVENUES:
Measure F revenues 345,704 $
Use of money and property 12,978
Total revenues 358,682
EXPENDITURES:
Contractual services 192,151
Streets and roads 411,268
Total expenditures 603,419
EXPENDITURES (244,737)
FUND BALANCE:
Beginning of year 488,305
End of year 243,568$
For the year ended June 30, 2025
REVENUES OVER
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
6 350
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. Reporting Entity
All transactions of th
e Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fees are reported in a special revenue f
und (VRF Fund) of the City of Dublin, California (City). The special re venue fund is included as part of t
he State Construction and Maintenance Fu nd in the basic financial statements of th e City.
The Fund is used to
account for the City’s revenues earned and expend itures incurred under the City’s various stre
et maintenance and construction projec ts. The accompanying financial statements are for the VRF Fund only and a
re not intended to fairly present the financial position of the City.
B. Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus
The accompanying fin
ancial statements are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Revenues are generally recorded when mea
surable and available, and expenditures are recorded when the related liabilities are incurred.
The accounting and fina
ncial reporting treatment app lied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. All governmenta
l funds are accounted for using a current financial resources measurement focus, wherein only c
urrent assets and current liabilitie s generally are included on th e balance sheet.
Operating stateme
nts of governmental funds presen t increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreas
es (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets.
C. Fund Accounting
The operations of the
VRF Fund are accounted for as part of the State Construction and Maintena nce Fund. Funds are
separate accounting entities with a set of self-balancing accounts which comprise their asset
s, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures.
D. Use of Es
timates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principl es generally accepted in the United States of America requires manage
ment to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reportin g period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
E. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The City pools its available cash for investment pu rposes. The City’s cash and cash equivalents are
considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and short-term investments with original maturity of t
hree months or less from date of acquisition. Cash and cash equivalents are combined with investments and displayed as Cash and Investments.
7 351
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POL ICIES, Continued E.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments, Continued
In accordance with GASB Statement
No. 40, Deposit and Investment Disclosures (Amendment of GASB No. 3), certain disclosure requirements for Dep
osits and Investment Risks were made in the following
areas:
Interest Rate Risk
Credit Risk
Overall
Custodial Credit Risk
Concentrations of Credit Risk
In addition,
other disclosures are specified including use of certain methods to present deposits and investments, highly sensitive investments, credit quality at year-end and other disclosures.
In accordance with GASB Statement No. 31, A ccounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools, highly liquid market investments with maturities of one year or less at time of purchase are stated at amortized cost.
The City participates in an investment pool manag ed by the State of California titled Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) which has invested a portion of the pooled funds in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities. LAIF’s investments are subject to credit risk with the full faith and credit of the State of California collateralizing these investments. In addition, these Structured Notes and Asset- Backed Securities are subject to market risk as to change in interest rates.
F. Revenues and Receivables
During the course of normal operations, the fund carries various receivable balanc es for
intergovern
mental revenue and interest. Revenues are recorded when received in cash, except revenues subject to accrual (generally 60 days after year-end ) are recognized when due. The primary revenue sources, which have been treated as susceptible to accrual by the fund, are Measure F vehicle registration fees.
2. MEASURE
F ALAMEDA COUNTY VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEES
The Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF) Program was approved by the voters in November 2010, with 63 percent of the vote. The fee will generate about $11 million per year by a $10 per year vehicle registration fee. The collection of the $10 per year vehicle registration fee started in the first week of May 2011.
The goal of the VRF program is to sustain the Co unty’s transportation network and reduce traffic congestion and vehicle related pollution. The program includes four categories of projects:
Local Road Improvement and Repair Program (60 percent) Transit for Congestion Relief (25 percent)
Local Transportation Technology (10 percent)
Pedestrian
and Bicyclist Access and Safety Program (5 percent)
8 352
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
The VRF Fund’s cash and investments are pooled with the City’s cash and investments in order to generate optimum interest income.
The City pools its available cash for investment pu rposes. The City’s cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and short-term investments with original maturity of three months or less from date of acquisition. Ca sh and cash equivalents are combined with investments and displayed as Cash and Investments.
VRF Fund had the following cash and investments at June 30, 2025:
Cash and Investments $ 183,879
A. Investments
The City's Investment Policy and the California Gove rnment Code allow the City to invest in the following, provided the credit ratings of t
he i ssuers are acceptable to the City; and approved
percentages and
maturities are not exceeded. The tabl e below also identifies certain provisions of the California Government
Code, or the City's Investment Policy where the City's Investment Policy is more restricti
ve.
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Minimum Credit
Quality
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Maximum
Investment In
One Issuer
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years A-1 30% 20%
Bankers' Acceptance 180 days A-1 40% 20% of Portfolio
U.S. Treasury Bills and Notes 10 years N/A No Limit No Limit U.S. Government Agency Securities 10 years N/A 25% for callable 35% California Asset Management Program N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Commercial Paper 270 days A-1 25% 20% of Portfolio
Time Certificates of Deposit 1 year N/A 10% No Limit
State Local Agency Investment Fund N/A N/A No Limit No Limit Asset-Backed Securities 5 years AA 20% 5%
Medium-Term Notes 5 years A 30% 5%
Mutual Funds N/A AAA 20% 10%
Money Market Funds N/A AAA 20% No Limit
Municipal Securities 10 years A No Limit 5%
Supranationals 5 years AA 30% 10%
In accordance with GASB Statement No. 31, A
ccounting and Financial Reporting for Certain
Investments and for External Investment Pools, investments were stated at fair value using the aggregate method in all funds and component units. The City’s investments are carried at fair market value as required by generally acce pted accounting principles. The City accounts for all changes in fair value that occurred during the year and are reflected in the fund balance for the fiscal year. These investment value changes are unrealized since the Ci ty’s policy is to hold and buy investments until maturity dates.
9 353
City of Dublin
Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
For the year ended June 30, 2025
3. CASH AND INVESTMENTS, Co ntinued
B. Risk Di
sclosures
Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is the fluctuation in fa ir value of investment due to changes in interest rates. The City’s exposure to losses caused by rising interest rates is minimized by limiting the average mat
urity of the City’s investment not to exceed five years.
Credit Risk – Credit risk is the risk o
f loss of value of a security or investment due to downgrade of its rating due to a change in the ability of the issuer to fulfill its debt obligation. With the exception of U.S.
Treasury securities and
authorized pools, no more than 50% of the City ’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution to reduce the City’s exposure to credit risks.
Custodial Cr
edit Risk – The custodial credit risk for an investment is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outs i d e p a r t y . N o n e o f t h e C i t y ’ s i nvestments were subject to custodial cr
edit risk.
C. Local Agency Investmen
t Fund
The City is a voluntary
participant in the Local Agen cy Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by California Government Code Section 16429 under th e oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The City’s investments with LAIF at June 30, 2025, include a portion of the pool funds invested in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities. These invest ments include the following:
Structured Notes – are debt securities
(other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturi ty) depend upon one or more indices and/or have embedded forwards or options.
Asset
-Backed Securities – the bulk of which are mortgage-backed securities, entitle their purcha sers to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of asse ts such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mort
gages (such as Collateralized Mortgage Obligations) or credit card receivables.
As of June
30, 2025, the City had invested in LAIF, which had invested 3.81% of the pool investment funds in Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities as compared to 3.00% in the previous year. The LAIF fair va
lue factor of 1.001198310 was used to calculate the fair value of the investments in LAIF.
4. DIRE
CT LOCAL DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM RECEIVABLES
The receivables represent the Measure F VRF revenues for the fiscal year received from the Alameda County Transportation Commission after June 30, 2025.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The City participates in several grant programs. Th ese programs are subject to any further examination by the grantors and the amount, if any, of expenditures which may be disallowed by the granting agencies cannot be determined at this time. The City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. 10 354
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE
AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund (VRF Fund) of the City of Dublin, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 10, 2025.
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.
355
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the VRF Fund’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
12 356
REPO
RT ON COMPLIANCE AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL
OVER COMPLIANCE FOR MEASURE F
Independent Auditor’s Report
To th
e Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Report on Compliance for Measure F
Opinion on Compliance for Measure F
We have audited City of Dublin’s (City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission that could have a direct and material effect on its Measure F Alameda County Vehicle Registration Fee Fund (VRF Fund) for the year ended June 30, 2025.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on its VRF Fund for the year ended June 30, 2025.
Basis for Opinion on Measure F
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States ( Government Auditing Standards); and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission. Our responsibilities under those standards and are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the City’s VRF Fund. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the VRF Fund’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s VRF Fund.
357
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the VRF Fund’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the VRF Fund’s compliance with the requirements of the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the VRF Fund’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the agreement between the City and Alameda County Transportation Commission, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control over Compliance
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined below. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.
14 358
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the agreement between the City and the Alameda County Transportation Commission. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
15 359
Independent Accountant’s Report
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We have examined the City of Dublin, California (City)’s compliance with the compliance requirements “activities allowed or unallowed” and “allowable cost/cost principles” (the specified requirements) as described in Part IV “Requirements for an Alternative Compliance Examination Engagement for Recipients That Would Otherwise be Required to Undergo a Single Audit or Program-Specific Audit as a Result of Receiving Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds” of the CSLFRF section of the 2025 OMB Compliance Supplement (referred to herein as “Requirements for an Alternative CSLFRF Compliance Examination Engagement”) during the year ended June 30, 2025. Management of the City is responsible for the City’s compliance with the specified requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the City’s compliance with the specified requirements based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the AICPA; the standards applicable to attestation engagements contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and in the “Requirements for an Alternative CSLFRF Compliance Examination Engagement.” Those standards and requirements require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the City complied, in all material respects, with the specified requirements referenced above. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about whether the City complied with the specified requirements. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
We are required to be independent and meet our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to the engagement.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the City’s compliance with specified requirements.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the specified requirements referenced above during the year ended June 30, 2025.
Attachment 7
360
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we are required to report all deficiencies that are considered to be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control; fraud, and noncompliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements that have a material effect on the City’s compliance with the specified requirements and any other instances that warrant the attention of those charged with governance. We are also required to obtain and report the views of responsible officials concerning the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, as well as any planned corrective actions. We performed our examination to express an opinion on the City’s compliance with the specified requirements and not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the internal control over the specified requirements or on compliance and other matters; accordingly, we express no such opinions. The results of our tests disclosed no matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Intended Purpose
The purpose of this examination report is solely to express an opinion on whether the City complied, in all material respects with the specified requirements referenced above during the year ended June 30, 2025. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Badawi & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
361
City of
Dublin
Dublin, California
Independent Accountants’ Report on
Agreed-Upon Procedures Applied to
Appropriations Limit Schedule
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026
Attachment 8
362
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of City Council of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We have performed the procedures enumerated below on the accompanying Appropriations Limit Schedule of the City of Dublin (City) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. The City’s management is responsible for the accompanying Appropriations Limit Schedule.
The City has agreed to and acknowledged that the procedures performed are appropriate to meet the intended purpose of the requirements of Section 1.5 of Article XIII-B of the California Constitution.
Additionally, the League of California Cities (as presented in the publication entitled Agreed-upon Procedures Applied to the Appropriations Limitation Prescribed by Article XIII-B of the California Constitution) has agreed to and acknowledged that the procedures performed are appropriate for their purposes. This report may not be suitable for any other purpose. The procedures performed may not address all the items of interest to a user of this report and may not meet the needs of all users of this report and, as such, users are responsible for determining whether the procedures performed are appropriate for their purposes.
The procedures performed and our findings are described below:
1. We obtained the completed worksheets used by the City to calculate its appropriations limit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, and determined that the limit and annual calculation factors were adopted by resolution of City Council. We also determined that the population and inflation options were selected by a recorded vote of City Council.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures.
2. For the accompanying Appropriations Limit Schedule, we added the prior year’s limit to the total adjustments, and agreed the resulting amount to the current year’s limit.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures.
3. We agreed the current year information presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit Schedule to corresponding information in worksheets used by the City.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures.
4. We agreed the prior year appropriations limit presented in the accompanying Appropriations Limit Schedule to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the City Council during the prior year.
Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 363
To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
of the City of Dublin
Dublin, California
We were engaged by the City to perform this agreed-upon procedures engagement and conducted our engagement in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. We were not engaged to and did not conduct an examination or review, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion or conclusion, respectively, on the accompanying Appropriation Limit Schedule. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion or conclusion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements related to our agreed-upon procedures engagement.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and management of the City and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this report is a matter of public record, and its distribution is not limited.
Badaw
i & Associates, CPAs
Emeryville, California
December 10, 2025
2 364
City of Dublin
Appropriations Limit Schedule
Amount Source
A. Appropriations limit for the year ended June 30, 2025 485,074,181$ Prior year resolution B. Calculation Factors:
1. Population increase % 1.0217 State Department of Finance
2. Inflation increase % 1.0644 City of Dublin
3. Total adjustment factor % 1.0875 B1*B2
C. Annual Adjustment Increase 42,443,991 [(B3-1)A)]
D. Other Adjustments - N/A
E. Total Adjustments 42,443,991 (C+D)
F. Appropriations limit for the year ending June 30, 2026 527,518,172$ (A+E) For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026
3 365
City of Dublin
Notes to Appropriations Limit Schedule
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026
1. PURP
OSE OF LIMITED PROCEDURES REVIEW
Under Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (the Gann Spending Limitation Initiative), California governmental agencies are restricted as to the amount of annual appropriations from proceeds of taxes.
Effective for years beginning on or after July 1, 1990, under Section 1.5 of Article XIIIB, the annual calculation of the appropriations limit is subject to a limited procedures review in connection with the annual audit.
2. METHOD OF CALCULATION
Under Section 10.5 of Article XIIIB, for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1990, the appropriations limit is required to be calculated based on the limit for the fiscal year 1986-1987, adjusted for the inflation and population factors discussed in Notes 3 and 4 below.
3. INFLATION FACTORS
A California governmental agency may adjust its appropriations limit by either the annual percentage change in the 4th quarter per capita personal income (which percentage is supplied by the State Department of Finance), or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year due to the change of local nonresidential construction. The factor adopted by the City of Dublin for the fiscal year 2025-2026 represents the annual percentage change in the 4th quarter per capita personal income.
4. POPULATION FACTORS
A California governmental agency may adjust its appropriations limit by either the annual percentage change of the jurisdiction’s own population, or the annual percentage change in population in the County where the jurisdiction is located. The factor adopted by the City of Dublin for fiscal year 2025-2026 represents the annual percentage change in population for the City.
5. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS
A California government agency may be required to adjust its appropriations limit when certain events occur, such as the transfer of responsibility for municipal services, to, or from, another government agency or private entity. There were no adjustments made for fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. 4 366
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.5
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Selection of Names of Two New Parks within the Francis Ranch Development
Prepared by: Bridget Amaya, Assistant Parks & Community Services Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will select the names of the two new neighborhood parks located in the Francis Ranch Development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Confirm Poppy Meadow Park as the name of the northern park and Wild Wind Park as the name of the southern park in the Francis Ranch Development.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The Francis Ranch Development (formerly known as East Ranch) is located north of Interstate 580, east of Fallon Road and the Jordan Ranch development, south of the Positano development, and adjacent to the City’s eastern boundary. The development includes six neighborhoods and two public parks totaling 11 acres. The developer collaborated with Staff to facilitate the design and construction of two new 5.5-acre parks, the northern park and the southern park. Following community input and public meetings, conceptual designs were presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission on November 18, 2024, and subsequently, approved by the City Council on December 3, 2024. The approved designs are provided as Attachment 1. Construction is slated to begin in January 2026 with tentative park openings scheduled for winter 2027.
367
The northern park will include the following amenities:
Reservable picnic area with shade elements and BBQ
Fitness stations
Playgrounds for ages 2 to 5 Years and 5 to 12 years
Dog park
Meditation garden
Grass area for free play
Interior pathways for circulation and exercise
Restroom
The southern park will include the following amenities:
One multi-use court (one tennis court with an overlay of four pickleball courts) One basketball court
Two bocce ball courts
Reservable picnic area with shade elements and BBQ
Playgrounds for ages 2 to 5 Years and 5 to 12 years
Pollinator garden
Grass area for free play
Interior pathways for circulation and exercise
Restroom
Public Input and Naming Process
Per the City’s Park Naming policy, community members are invited to suggest names for new park sites, after which the top-ranked names are presented to the Parks and Community Services Commission for consideration and recommendation to the City Council. The policy outlines that park names should generally reflect:
Geographic location and characteristics
Landscaping, topography, natural features
Design amenities or features
Historical significance
Recognition of a significant contributor to the advancement of the City That the land or area is traditionally known as...
The adjoining neighborhood, area, or street
To gather input, Staff conducted a two-phase online survey process.
Phase One: Open-Ended Survey (May 23-June 13, 2025)
The first survey invited residents to submit ideas based on park design themes and local history. It was promoted through the City’s website, newsflash features, the Dublin Digest, social media, and the Mayor’s Report video. Each of 122 total participants submitted up to three names per park. The survey provided background information to guide respondents, including:
Park Themes
North Park: Exploration of California
368
South Park: Exploration of the Bay Area
Historical Context - The land where the new parks will be built was once owned by the Croak family, early Irish-American settlers who arrived in the U.S. in the late 1860s and purchased farmland in 1874 near what is now Croak Road. Inspirational Elements – Local flora (e.g., poppy, lilac, oak), California and Bay Area geography, and exploration themes
Design amenities – features from the approved conceptual designs for each park.
Phase Two: Combination Survey (October 9-October 26, 2025) Based on Phase One results, Staff identified standout name pairings that reflected both the provided guidance and a cohesive relationship between the two parks. These combinations were presented in a second survey, asking participants to select their preferred pairing or submit alternate combinations. Attachment 2 provides a description of these name pairings. A total of 127 responses were received. The following table displays the outcome of the survey:
TABLE 1: NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN PARK NAME SURVEY RESULTS Northern & Southern Park Names Response Percent Response Count Poppy Meadow Park & Wild Wind Park 34% 43
Golden Eagle Ridge & Gray Fox Hollow 20% 25
Wildflower Ridge & Croak Commons 15% 19
Golden Horizon Park & Oak Vale Park 13% 17
Golden Poppy Park & Colinas Doradas Park 10% 13
Golden Bloom Park & Croak Summit 8% 10
100% 127
The following additional name combinations suggested by respondents are included below:
Wildflower Ridge & Wild Wind Park
Croak Commons & Croak Summit
Golden Horizon Park & Croak Summit
Golden Poppy Park & Gray Fox Hollow
Golden Horizon Park & Wild Wind Park
Golden Poppy Park & Croak Commons
Colinas Doradas & Croak Commons
Wildflower Ridge & Croak Summit
Poppy Meadow Park & Wildflower Ridge
Golden Poppy Park & Wild Wind Park
Poppy Meadow Park & Gray Fox Hollow
Golden Bloom Park and Colinas Doradas Park
From these names, the Parks and Community Services Commission recommended to the City Council that the northern park be named Poppy Meadow Park and the southern park be named Wild Wind Park.
369
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted, and the Francis Ranch Developer was provided with a copy of the Staff Report.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) City Council Approved Conceptual Park Designs
2) Park Name Combination Descriptions
370
PROJECT NAME LOCATION, CALIFORNIAFRANCIS RANCH PARKS DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA 0 15’ 30’ 60’
1 11
16 12
17 13
18 14
2 6
3 7
4 8
5 9
10 15
Play Area
Central Green
Drycreek Arroyo
Walkways and Trails
Restroom w/Drinking Fountain
Shade Structure
Shade Trees
Street Trees
Dog Park
Ornamental Fence
Connection To Fallon Village Regional Trail
Fitness Equipment
Park Sign
BBQ Area
Overlook
Flex Space
Meditation Garden
1JDOJD"SFB
LEGEND
3 11
1 4
4 5
9 10
15 12
2 8
7 6
14 13
1
17 16
16 3
3 3
3 4
7 THEME- &91-03"5*0/CALIFORNIA
/035)&3/1"3,&9)*#*5$0/$&15
Attachment 1
371
PROJECT NAME LOCATION, CALIFORNIAFRANCIS RANCH PARKS DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN PARK EXHIBIT CONCEPT 1 11
12 13
14 2
6 3
7 4
8 5
9 10
LEGEND
Play Area
Central Green
Drycreek Arroyo
Walkways and Trails
Restroom w/Drinking Fountain
Shade Structure
Bocce Courts (2)
Basketball Full Size Court
Tennis Courts ( ) + Pickleball Courts (4)
Pollinator Garden
Street Trees
Shade Trees
Park Sign
BBQ Area
Overlook
Flex Space
DG Walkway
6 3
3 13
14 4
4 4
4 1
7 5
8 9
10 17
2 11
11 12
12 3
3 3
3 16
17 15
15 16
16 THEME- &91-03"5*0/BAY AREA
372
Attachment 2
Park Name Combination Descriptions
Golden Poppy Park (North) & Colinas Doradas Park (South) Golden Poppy Park: California state flower; botanical heritage. Colinas Doradas Park: “Golden Hills” in Spanish; complements the “golden” theme and reflects Bay Area topography. Connection: Both names share the “golden” theme and botanical/topographic imagery, creating a visually and conceptually unified pairing.
Poppy Meadow Park (North) & Wild Wind Park (South)
Poppy Meadow Park: Celebrates California’s state flower and the natural beauty of open grasslands. “Meadow” reflects the park’s bright, colorful, and welcoming landscape, symbolizing community, renewal, and connection to nature. Wild Wind Park: Draws inspiration from Dublin’s naturally breezy environment, where steady winds are a defining feature of the local landscape. “Wild Wind” captures that movement and energy, symbolizing freedom and the untamed spirit of the outdoors. Connection: Together, the North park highlights color, openness, and California heritage, while the South park embraces Dublin’s characteristic wind and sense of motion. The names balance vibrancy and energy, celebrating the city’s natural elements and unique local character.
Golden Eagle Ridge Park (North) & Gray Fox Hollow (South) Golden Eagle Ridge Park: California state bird, symbolizes freedom and vision; “Ridge” reflects topography. Gray Fox Hollow: Local wildlife, tucked-away valley; evokes exploration, serenity, and natural Bay Area landscape. Connection: Both names emphasize wildlife and natural topography, creating a cohesive North/South nature and exploration theme.
Golden Bloom Park (North) & Croak Summit (South)
Celebrates California’s natural beauty and vibrant wildflowers. “Golden” connects to the state’s nickname and symbolizes warmth and optimism. “Bloom” evokes seasonal color, growth, and renewal. Croak Summit Park (South): Honors the Croak family’s local legacy and ties to Dublin’s history. “Summit” suggests elevation in the Dublin hills and vision. Connection: The North park evokes color, light, and renewal, while the South park grounds the pair in heritage, pride, and perspective, creating a meaningful connection between Dublin’s natural and historical roots.
Golden Horizon Park (North) & Oak Vale Park (South)
Golden Horizon Park: Suggests the warm glow of California sunlight. “Golden” reflects both natural beauty and California’s nickname as the Golden State, symbolizing vibrancy and discovery. Oak Vale Park: Honors the strength and longevity of native
373
oak trees, a defining part of California’s natural heritage. The word “Vale” (valley) adds a poetic quality, suggesting a grounded, serene retreat. Connection: The North park emphasizes light, openness, and inspiration, while the South park conveys rootedness and heritage. The names complement each other, uniting discovery and serenity into a cohesive theme.
Wildflower Ridge Park (North) & Croak Commons (South)
Wildflower Ridge: Celebrates California native wildflowers and ridge topography; exploration and natural beauty. Croak Commons: Honors the Croak family; emphasizes community gathering space. Connection: The North park embodies nature, color, and exploration, while the South park represents heritage, community, and togetherness. The names balance natural beauty and local history, creating a unified theme that celebrates both Dublin’s landscape and its roots.
374
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.6
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project (FEMA Project No. 716372) and Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive Project (FEMA Project No. 733034), CIP No. GI0221, Acceptance of Work
Prepared by: Andrew Russell, Public Works Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider accepting the Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project and the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Project. The projects consisted of repairing shallow landslides and other damage caused by the storms in winter 2022-2023.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 716372; and adopt the Resolution Accepting the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive Project, CIP No.
GI0221, FEMA Project No. 733034.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project and the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Project are two of five projects included in the Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements Capital Improvement Program project (CIP No. GI0221). The total cost for the two projects is as follows:
375
Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements, CIP No. GI0221
Funding Source (Total Resiliency Project Budget)
General Fund $3,414,189
Total Funding $3,414,189
Expenditures
Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair $1,278,301 Construction Contract: $965,078
Change Orders: $13,223
Contract Services, Design, Salary, and Testing: $300,000 Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive $778,028 Construction Contract: $587,620
Change Orders: ($9,592)
Contract Services, Design, Salary, and Testing: $200,000
Total Expenditures $2,056,329
Mape Memorial Park Pathway Relocation (Approved 12/2/25) $249,377
Total Expenditures of Approved Projects $2,305,706
Estimated Project Balance $1,108,483
The remaining budget will be retained within CIP No. GI0221 for use on the other Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness projects. The Mape Memorial Park Pathway Relocation Project was completed and accepted by the City Council on December 2, 2025.
DESCRIPTION:
The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements Project, CIP No. GI0221. The Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements Project provides for the planning, design, environmental permitting, and construction of repairs at various sites throughout the City that were damaged in the series of rainfall events in December 2022 and January 2023, which were declared a major disaster for the State of California, including Alameda County, by the President on January 14, 2023.
Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair
On June 17, 2025, the City Council awarded the Dougherty Hills Open Space and Trail Repair construction contract in the amount of $965,078 to Granite Construction Company. The work included the reconstruction of a slope, trail, and associate improvements at the trailhead adjacent to the intersection of Crossridge Road and Shady Creek Road. As a condition of the contract, Granite Construction Company is required to warranty the improvements for a period 376
of one year following the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
During construction, additive change orders for $29,023 were issued for additional tree removals, slope hydroseeding, erosion control measures, aggregate base material, subdrain markers, and trail signs. Deductive changes for $15,800 were applied for the field-verified decrease in contract bid item quantities and for a change to reuse an existing storm drain inlet instead of constructing a new inlet. The resulting balancing of change orders results in a net increase of $13,223. The improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and Staff recommends that the City Council accept the project and begin the warranty period. Pictures of the damage and the repair work are provided below.
Image 1 – Damaged slope, from bottom
Image 2 – Repaired slope, from bottom
Image 3 – Repaired trail and slope
Image 1 Image 2
377
Image 3
Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive On June 17, 2025, the City Council awarded the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive construction contract in the amount of $587,620 to Granite Construction Company. The work included the reconstruction of the roadside slope and trail damaged by shallow landslides that occurred along Dublin Boulevard between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive. As a condition of the contract, Granite Construction Company is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
During construction, additive change orders for $109,553 were issued for additional underground utility locating, trail reconstruction, rock excavation, large rock slope protection, erosion control materials, subdrain markers, and slope hydroseeding. Deductive changes for $119,145 were applied for the field verified decrease in contract bid item quantities. The resulting balancing of change orders results in a net decrease of $9,592. The improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and Staff recommends that the City Council accept the project and begin the warranty period. Pictures of the damage and the repair work are provided below.
378
Image 1 – Damaged slope, from top
Image 2 – During construction, from bottom
Image 3 – Repaired slope, drone view
Image 1 Image 2
379
Image 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted. A copy of this Staff Report was provided to Granite Construction Company.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Accepting the Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 716372
2) Resolution Accepting the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 733034 3) CIP No. GI0221
380
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ACCEPTING THE DOUGHERTY HILLS OPEN SPACE SLIDE AND TRAIL REPAIR PROJECT, CIP NO. GI0221, FEMA PROJECT NO. 716372
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025 , the City entered into a construction contract with Granite Construction Company for the Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Repair Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 716372; and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, Granite Construction Company is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year followi ng the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby accept the Dougherty Hills Open Space Slide and Trail Re pair Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 716372, and authorize Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to relea se the retention, if after 35 days of filing the Notice of Completion there are no subcontractor claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to release the maintenance bond at the end of the one- year warranty period.
{Signatures on the following page}
381
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
382
Attachment 2
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ACCEPTING THE DUBLIN BOULEVARD SLIDE REPAIR BETWEEN INSPIRATION DRIVE AND SILVERGATE DRIVE PROJECT, CIP NO. GI0221, FEMA PROJECT NO. 733034
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025 , the City entered into a construction contract with Granite Construction Company for the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 733034; and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, Granite Construction Company is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby accept the Dublin Boulevard Slide Repair Between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive Project, CIP No. GI0221, FEMA Project No. 733034 , and authorize Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to release the retention, if after 35 days of filing the Notice of Completion there are no subcontractor claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to release the maintenance bond at the end of the one- year warranty period.
{Signatures on the following page}
383
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
384
Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness
Improvements
Overview
Project Number GI0221
Description
Beginning in the end of December 2022 through the rst few weeks of 2023, Dublin and most of California experienced damage due to a series of rain fall events that were declared a major disaster in Alameda County by the President on January 17, 2023. The City experienced damage at various sites, including street rights-of-way, parks and open space, and facilities and buildings. This project provide for the planning, design, environmental permitting, if necessary, and construction to make the repairs at various sites impacted. The following locations and types of repairs have been identied:
Dougherty Hills Open Space, Crossridge Road Trailhead – slide repair Dublin Boulevard, between Inspiration Drive and Silvergate Drive – slide repair Mape Memorial Park – Pathway Relocation
Koopman Canyon Creek at Shannon Community Center/San Ramon Road – channel and culvert improvements Martin Canyon Creek at Silvergate Drive - channel improvements Koopman Canyon Creek at Fenwick Court - trash rack repair and channel improvements Clark Canyon Creek at Padre Way - track rack repair and channel improvements The City has applied for grants for this project through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and California Of ce of Emergency Services (CalOES).
Capital Cost
Historical
$1.1M
FY2025 Budget
$937K
Total Budget (all years)
$2.31M
Project Total (to date)
$3.41M
Detailed Breakdown
Category Historical FY2025 FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029Future Total 9400 - Repairs/Improvements $825,000 $660,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,485,000 9200 - Contract Services $223,000 $277,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 9100 - Salaries & Bene ts $54,189 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129,189 Total $1,102,189 $937,000 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,414,189 Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements
2024-2029 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Update | DublinPage 49 Attachment 3 385
Funding Sources
Historical
$1.1M
FY2025 Budget
$937K
Total Budget (all years)
$2.31M
Project Total (to date)
$3.41M
Operational Costs
FY2025 Budget
$0
Total Budget (all years)
$0
Project Total
$0
Project Timeline
● 07/1/2025
The clean-up effort immediately following the storm events are complete and the preliminary engineering for the permanent repair began in Fiscal Year 2023-24. The project is currently in the preliminary engineering, design, or construction phases. A construction contract for the Mape Memorial Park Pathway Relocation project was awarded in May 2025 and construction began in June 2025. The two slide repair projects are anticipated to begin construction in summer 2025.
Detailed Breakdown
Category Historical FY2025 FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029Future Total 1001 - General Fund $1,102,189 $937,000 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,414,189 Total $1,102,189 $937,000 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,414,189 Table of Contents
Resiliency and Disaster Preparedness Improvements
2024-2029 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Update | Dublin
386
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.7
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Citywide Trash Capture Devices, CIP No. ST0121, Acceptance of Work Prepared by: Andrew Russell, Public Works Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider accepting the Citywide Trash Capture Devices project. The project consisted of installing new and replacing existing small trash capture devices in 86 storm drain inlets throughout the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Citywide Trash Capture Devices Project, CIP No.
ST0121.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Citywide Trash Capture Devices project is part of the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Capital Improvement Program project (CIP No. ST0121). The total cost for the Citywide Trash Capture Devices Project is as follows:
387
Citywide Trash Capture Devices:
Funding Source – ST0121 – Green Stormwater Infrastructure General Fund Designated Reserve $1,373,376
Other County Reimbursement $2,335,687
Total Funding $3,709,063
Expenditures
Construction Contract $224,254
Construction Change Orders $11,984
Contract Services, Design, Salary, and Testing $210,000 Total Expenditures $446,238
Estimated Project Balance $3,262,825
The remaining budget will be retained within CIP No. ST0121 for use on the other Green Stormwater Infrastructure projects.
DESCRIPTION:
The 2024-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) Project, CIP No. ST0121. The GSI Project provides for the planning, design, and construction of various projects that improve water quality and provide other environmental benefits in accordance with the Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan, which was approved by the City Council on June 18, 2019.
On July 15, 2025, the City Council awarded the Citywide Trash Capture Devices construction contract in the amount of $224,254 to American Enviro Services, Inc. The Citywide Trash Capture Devices project installed 86 small trash capture devices in existing storm drain inlets throughout the City. These devices filter trash and other pollutants from surface water runoff before the water enters the underground storm drainpipes, which connect to channels, creeks, and eventually to the San Francisco Bay. The project is necessary to meet the 100% trash load reduction requirements as mandated by Provision C.10 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Permit No. CAS612008, Order No. R2-2022-0018 (known as the “MRP”), issued by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. As a condition of the contract, American Enviro Services, Inc. is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
During construction, additive change orders for $27,389 were issued for removal of debris from several drain inlets, modifications to trash capture devices due to field conditions, and substitution of different devices at three locations due to field conditions. Deductive changes for $15,405 were applied for the field verified decrease in contract bid item quantities. The resulting balancing of change orders results in a net increase of $11,984. The improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications to the satisfaction of the City 388
Engineer, and Staff recommends that the City Council accept the project and begin the warranty period. Pictures of one of the installed trash capture devices is provided below.
Image 1 – Curb inlet grate
Image 2 – Semi-circular device and screen (prevents falling material getting beyond the filter)
Image 3 – Circular filter
Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted. A copy of this Staff Report was provided to American Enviro Services, Inc.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Accepting the Citywide Trash Capture Devices Project, CIP No. ST0121 2) CIP No. ST0121
389
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX - 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ACCEPTING THE CITYWIDE TRASH CAPTURE DEVICES PROJECT, CIP NO. ST0121
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2025, the City entered into a construction contract with American Enviro Services, Inc. for the Citywide Trash Capture Devices Project, CIP No. ST0121; and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been completed in accordance with plans and specifications, and any approved modifications thereof, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the City of Dublin; and
WHEREAS, as a condition of the contract, American Enviro Services, Inc. is required to warranty the improvements for a period of one year following the completion of the work and maintain a maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract value.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby accept the Citywide Trash Capture Devices Project, CIP No. SST0121, and authorize Staff to file a Notice of Completion with Alameda County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to release the retention, if after 35 days of filing the Notice of Completion there are no subcontractor claims.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager, or designee, to release the maintenance bond at the end of the one- year warranty period.
{Signatures on the following page}
390
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
391
Green Stormwater Infrastructure
Overview
Project Number ST0121
Description
This project provides for the planning, design, and construction of various citywide projects that will improvewater quality and provide other environmental bene ts in accordancewith the Green Stormwater Infrastructure(GSI) Plan. The GSI Plan and associated projects and trash load reduction requirements aremandated bythe Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP). Projects include stormwater full trash capturedeviceinstallation throughout the City, and construction of GSI along the Iron Horse Regional Trail corridor, south of Amador ValleyBoulevard. The City and Alameda CTC entered intoCooperative Agreements on February7, 2023 and April 16, 2024topartner on the design, environmental permitting, and construction phases for a bio-retention and hydromodi cation management facility along the Iron Horse Regional Trail corridor, south of Amador ValleyBoulevard, that satis es a portion of the City's GSI requirement and Alameda CTC's project, SR84 Expressway Widening and SR84/I-680 Interchange Improvements. Construction is anticipated tobe completein summer 2025.
Alameda CTC's shareof the costs is 75% of the total, whichwill be reimbursed tothe City after expenditure. Both agencies will enter intoa subsequent agreement for the maintenancephase. The "Other CountyReimbursement" funding is from Alameda CTC.
The design of the Citywide Trash CaptureDevices phase of the project is completed and is anticipated tobegin construction in summer 2025.
Capital Cost
Historical
$3.29M
FY2025 Budget
$420K
Total Budget (all years)
$870K
Project Total (todate)
$4.16M
Detailed Breakdown
Category Historical FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Future Total 9400- Improvements $2,333,670 $275,000 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,908,670 9200- ContractServices $847,053 $115,000 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,082,053 9100- Salaries& Benefits $96,340 $30,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $156,340 9500- Miscellaneous $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000
Total $3,289,063 $420,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,159,063 Green Stormwater Infrastructure
2024-2029 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Update | Dublin Attachment 2
392
Funding Sources
Historical
$3.29M
FY2025 Budget
$420K
Total Budget (all years)
$870K
Project Total (todate)
$4.16M
Operational Costs
FY2025 Budget
$0
Total Budget (all years)
$7.5K
Project Total
$7.5K
Project Timeline
● 06/18/2019
Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan approved.
● 07/1/2021
Planning phase began.
● 02/7/2023
Cooperative Agreement with Alameda CTC approved for the design and environmental permitting phase.
● 04/16/2024
Cooperative Agreement with Alameda CTC approved for the construction phase. ● 07/1/2025
Planning for trash capture device installation began in Fiscal Year 2021-22. Staff have identi ed approximately 80 locations for potential device installation anticipated in summer 2025. Construction of GSI along the Iron Horse Regional Trail corridor began in summer 2024 and is anticipated to be completed in summer 2025.
Detailed Breakdown
Category Historical FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 Future Total 9901- Other County
Reimbursement
$2,335,687 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,335,687
1101- General Fund
DesignatedReserve
$953,376 $420,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,823,376
Total $3,289,063 $420,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,159,063 Green Stormwater Infrastructure
2024-2029 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Update | Dublin 393
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.8
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO:
FROM:
Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8.84 (Sign Regulations) (PLPA- 004290-2025)
Prepared by: Amy Million, Community Development Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On December 2, 2025, the City Council considered City-initiated amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.84 (Sign Regulations). The proposed amendments address direction from the City Council to amend the regulation for Temporary Non-Commercial Signs, and other Staff-initiated amendments that are intended to bring greater clarity and consistency to existing regulations. The City Council waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance. The City Council is now requested to waive the second reading and adopt the proposed Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance Approving Amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.84 (Sign Regulations).
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Implementation of the recommended amendments is anticipated to have minimal financial impact. The removal of illegal signs and related administrative tasks are handled through the normal work of the existing Code Enforcement Officers without additional cost to the City.
However, expenses related to the storage of the signs and invoicing of the fee will be incurred.
These costs will be offset by the proposed fee of $50. Pursuant to the City’s fee policy, the City Manager may set a fee before the next comprehensive fee study, and the fee would be officially added to the fee schedule for adoption in July.
394
DESCRIPTION:
The City has initiated amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code (DMC) to address direction from the City Council regarding the regulation and enforcement of Temporary Non-Commercial Signs. In addition, Staff is proposing other minor amendments to the Sign Regulations to clarify certain provisions to ensure that the Sign Regulations remain internally consistent, simple to understand and implement, and relevant to changes occurring in the community.
On December 2, 2025, the City Council waived the first reading and introduced the Ordinance approving the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments as provided in Attachment 1. The December 2, 2025 City Council staff report is included as Attachment 2.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the amendments will have a significant effect on the environment and are not subject to CEQA review.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
In accordance with State law, a public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. Additionally, the City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Approving Amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.84 (Sign Regulations)
2) December 2, 2025 Staff Report (without attachments)
395
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. XX - 25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.84 (SIGN
REGULATIONS)
(PLPA-004290-2025)
The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The City occasionally initiates amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code to clarify, add, or amend certain provisions to ensure that it remains internally consistent, simple to understand a nd implement, and relevant to changes occurring in the community.
B. On September 2, 2025, the City Council discussed the regulation and enforcement of temporary political campaign signs and directed Staff to prepare the following amendments to the regulation of Temporary Non-Commercial Signs: 1) require such signs to be removed within 7 days following the conclusion of the event; 2) require a property owner consent form for placement of signs on private property; and 3) implement a sign retrieval fee. In addition, Staff initiated amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.84 (Sign Regulations). The proposed amendments (the “Project”) would bring greater clarity and consistency to existing regulations.
C. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2025, during which all interested persons were heard, and adopted Resolution No. 25-05 recommending that the City Council approve the Project.
D. A Staff Report was submitted to the Dublin City Council recommending approval of the Project.
E. The City Council held a public hearing on December 2, 2025, at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to be heard.
F. Proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law.
G. The City Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony set forth above and used its independent judgement to evaluate the Project.
SECTION 2: FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.120.050 .B., the City Council hereby finds that the Project is consistent with the General Plan in that the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments are necessary to provide clarity to existing regulations and internal consistency of the Zoning Ordinance.
396
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 2 of 3 B. The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), together with the State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The Ci ty Council finds that the Project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) as the Project would not result in any physical changes and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Projec t would have a significant effect on the environment and is not subject to CEQA review.
SECTION 3: AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8.84
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.84.050.O.2. is amended to read as follows:
O.2. Banner Signs. Up to two (2) Banner Signs are permitted pursuant to a Zoning Clearance and may be placed on site for a maximum of twenty -one (21) consecutive calendar days per permit. A minimum waiting period of forty-two (42) consecutive calendar days between displays is required. A Banner Sign shall not be larger than sixty (60) square feet in size and shall not be located so that it is higher than the eave of the structure in which the business is located. One (1) Banner Sign may be displayed on a tenant’s building fr ontage and one (1) Banner Sign may be displayed on the street frontage. If there is more than one street frontage, one (1) Banner Sign may be displayed on each street frontage (in lieu of the building frontage), up to two (2) street frontages, if the Banner Signs are at least two hundred (200) feet apart.
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.84.120.D. is amended to read as follows:
(D) Main Entrance Proximity. Freestanding Signs shall be permitted at two (2) or more of the main entrances pursuant to a Master Sign Program.
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8. 84.140 Subsections H (Real Estate Signs) and I (Real Estate Directional Signs) are reordered to be in alphabetical order.
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.84.140.K is amended to read as follows:
K. Temporary Non-Commercial Signs. Temporary Non-Commercial Signs provided they comply with all the following:
1. Be displayed for no more than sixty (60) consecutive calendar days.
2. Be removed within seven (7) days following the conclusion of the event that is the subject of the sign.
3. Be placed on private property with the property owner’s written permission.
4. Be no more than sixteen (16) square feet per side in area per individual sign and up to eighty (80) square feet of maximum aggregate area per lot.
5. Not be placed within the public right-of-way or within six hundred sixty (660) feet of and visible from the right-of-way of Interstate 580 or Interstate 680.
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.84.170 is amended to read as follows:
Application for a permit shall be filed on a form furnished by the Department of Community Development and shall include other information determined by the Community Development Director.
397
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 3 of 3 Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.84.270 subsection E is amended to read as follows:
E. Each person who erects a sign, which is subject to removal under this section, is jointly and severally liable for the cost of removal. Temporary Non-Commercial signs removed from the public right-of-way shall be stored for a minimum of fifteen (15) days. The person responsible for the Temporary Non-Commercial sign is responsible for costs associated with the removal and storage. For the purpose of this section, the person responsible means the person that is the subject of the event or activity displayed on the Temporary Non-Commercial sign.
SECTION 4. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three public spaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days following its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 16th day of December 2025, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
398
Attachment 2
399
400
401
402
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.9
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin Municipal Code for Outdoor Live Entertainment (PLPA-004212-2025)
Prepared by: Jennifer Byous, Principal Planner and Christine Begin, Assistant Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
On December 2, 2025, the City Council adopted a resolution approving amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Section 3.4 (Land Use Designations) and waived the first reading and introduced an Ordinance amending the Dublin Municipal Code, which together would permit Outdoor Live Entertainment in the Downtown. The proposed Ordinance would amend Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), and Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), and add Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment). The City Council is now requested to waive the second reading and adopt the proposed Ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Waive the second reading and adopt the Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), and the Addition of Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use and Establish Development Standards.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City has initiated amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code related to outdoor live entertainment associated with outdoor seating areas. The proposed amendments build upon the City Council’s adoption of the citywide Outdoor Seating Design Guidelines on September 19, 2023, which established standards to ensure outdoor seating are aesthetically pleasing, 403
provide a high-quality environment for patrons, and appropriately designed for the location.
On December 2, 2025, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving amendments to the DDSP and waived the first reading and introduced an Ordinance approving the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments. In addition, the City Council directed Staff to evaluate the inclusion of specific holidays in the Zoning Clearance process to avoid triggering a subsequent Minor Use Permit, update City Council in one year on the implementation of outdoor live entertainment permits and streamline the noise complaint process.
Staff evaluated ways to include holidays that would be desirable to the residents and restaurants and determined that the existing Temporary Use Permit (TUP) best addressed the City Council’s direction. Restaurants often celebrate cultural holidays such as St. Patrick’s Day, Valentine’s Day and Cinco de Mayo in addition to official Federal and State holidays, making it difficult to adequately capture a list of a holidays that would serve all cultures and address the City Council’s desired outcome. Instead, a TUP would provide businesses with flexibility to have extended hours for the holidays they choose to celebrate. TUPs are approved by staff as an over-the-counter permit and have been successfully used to address outdoor holiday entertainment in the past for cultural holidays such as St. Patrick’s Day and Cinco de Mayo.
The proposed Ordinance is included as Attachment 1. The December 2, 2025 City Council staff report is included as Attachment 2.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The proposed amends to the DDSP and Zoning Ordinance are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment. The amendments only clarify and update existing regulations and do not allow new physical development or intensify existing uses. Future projects will remain subject to permitting processes, including compliance with the noise ordinance and other applicable standards. Therefore, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA review.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Strategy 1: Economic Development, Small Business Support, and Downtown Dublin Objective 1A: Support the implementation of the 2024 Economic Development Strategy, including pursuing growth industries.
Objective 1D: Continue to evaluate and implement small business programs that provide financial assistance, business development, permit processing, and support services to the community.
404
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
In accordance with state law, a public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. Additionally, the City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), and the Addition of Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use and Establish Development Standards 2) December 2, 2025 Staff Report (without attachments)
405
Attachment 1
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. XX-25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE DUBLIN MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.08 (DEFINITIONS), CHAPTER 8.12 (ZONING DISTRICTS AND PERMITTED USES OF LAND), CHAPTER 8.116 (ZONING CLEARANCE), AND THE ADDITION OF CHAPTER 8.41 (OUTDOOR
LIVE ENTERTAINMENT) TO ADD OUTDOOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AS AN ALLOWED USE
AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(PLPA-004212-2025)
The Dublin City Council does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS
A. The City’s overarching goal of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) "to create a vibrant, dynamic commercial and mixed -use center that provides a wide array of opportunities for shopping, services, dining, working, living, and entertainment in a pedestrian -friendly and aesthetically pleasing setting that attracts both local and regional residents.” To achieve this goal, the City occasionally initiates amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code.
B. Staff has initiated amendments to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an allowed use. In addition, a new Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) is proposed to be added to establish development stand ards for Outdoor Live Entertainment , and Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance). The proposed amendments (the “Project”) would allow Outdoor Live Entertainment with a zoning clearance to support live outdoor entertainment opportunities in the Downtown.
C. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2025, during which all interested persons were heard, and adopted Resolution No. 25-04 recommending that the City Council approve the Project.
D. A Staff Report was submitted to the Dublin City Council recommending approval of the Project.
E. The City Council held a public hearing on December 2, 2025, at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to be heard.
F. Proper notice of said hearing was given in all respects as required by law.
G. The City Council did hear and consider all said reports, recommendations, and testimony set forth above and used its independent judgement to evaluate the Project.
406
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 2 of 5 SECTION 2. FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.120.050 .B., the City Council hereby finds that the Project is consistent with the General Plan and Downtown Dublin Specific Plan in that the proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments are necessary to provide clarity and internal consistency within the Zoning Ordinance and to implement the Specific Plan’s goal of fostering a vibrant, mixed -use downtown environment. The amendments establish clear definitions, permitting procedures, and development standards for Outdoor Live Entertainment within the Downtown Dublin Zoning District, ensuring that such uses are appropriately regulated, compatible with surrounding uses, and compliant with applicable Building, Fire, and Noise Ordinance requirements.
B. The California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), together with the State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The City Council finds that the Project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment. The amendments only clarify and update existing regulations and do not allow new physical development or intensify existing uses. Future projects will remain subject to permitting processes, including compliance with the noise ordinance and other applicable standards. Therefore, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA review.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.08.020
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.08.020 is amended to add the following definition to the list:
Outdoor Live Entertainment (use type). The term Outdoor Live Entertainment shall mean live entertainment that occurs in outdoor areas, not within a fully enclosed permanent structure, associated with Outdoor Dining. This includes live music or amplified sound.
SECTION 4. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.12.050
The table headed “Commercial Use Types” in Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.12.050 is amended to add the following row and accompanying note:
COMMERCIAL USE TYPE A R-1 R-2 R-M C-O C-N C-1 C-2 M-P M-1 M-2 Outdoor Live Entertainment 8 - -
- - - -
- - - - -
8 Permitted with a Zoning Clearance or Minor Use Permit in the Downtown Dublin Zoning Districts only.
407
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 3 of 5 SECTION 5. ADDITION OF CHAPTER 8.41
Chapter 8.41, entitled Outdoor Live Entertainment, is hereby added to read as follows:
Chapter 8.41
OUTDOOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT
8.41.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide procedures and standards to encourage and facilitate the establishment of Outdoor Live Entertainment.
8.41.020 Intent.
The intent of this Chapter:
A. Allow for the safe and appropriate use of the outdoor dining area in which the outdoor live entertainment is located.
B. Support the principles of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to encourage a mix of complementary land uses including entertainment.
C. Ensure the outdoor live entertainment does not negatively impact traffic or parking facilities in the neighborhood or shopping center.
D. Ensure compliance with all Building and Fire Code regulations for the use, occupancy type and accessibility.
E. Reduce the potential for noise impacts from Outdoor Live Entertainment.
F. Establish development standards and regulations for the siting of Outdoor Live Entertainment within the City and verify compliance with the Outdoor Seating Design Guidelines.
8.41.030 Development Standards and Regulations.
Outdoor Live Entertainment shall comply with the following requirements:
A. Permitted Areas. Outdoor Live Entertainment is permitted in an approved Outdoor Dining area.
B. Permitted Days and Hours.
Sunday through Thursday 10am – 8pm
Friday and Saturday 10am – 10pm
C. Amplified Sound. Sound-amplifying equipment shall be limited to music, human speech, or both and be compliant with Dublin Municipal Code Section 5.28 (Noise). Business owners are required to regularly monitor sound levels and take corrective actions as needed to ensure continued compliance with the noise standards.
8.41.040 Permitting Procedure.
A. Zoning Clearance. A proposed Outdoor Live Entertainment shall be approved ministerially with a Zoning Clearance and without discretionary review or a public hearing if it meets the following standards:
1. Meets all Development Standards and Regulations under Section 8.41.030.
2. Located within an area designated for outdoor dining. 408
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 4 of 5
3. Meets all Building and Fire Code regulations for the use, occupancy type and accessibility for persons with disabilities.
4. The facility qualifies for an exemption for environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A Zoning Clearance form shall document the compliance of the Outdoor Live Entertainment with the above requirements and shall be kept on file in the Community Development Department for the duration of the operation of the Outdoor Live Entertainment.
B. Minor Use Permit. A proposed Outdoor Live Entertainment that does not meet the requirements for approval by zoning clearance under subsection A of this section shall require approval of a Minor Use Permit under Chapter 8.102 (Minor Use Permit).
SECTION 6. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.116.020
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.116.020 is amended to add the following subsection:
N. Outdoor Live Entertainment. Outdoor Live Entertainment that meets the standards specified in Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment).
SECTION 7. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.116.030
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.116.030 is amended to add the following subsection:
L. Outdoor Live Entertainment. If the Zoning Clearance is for Outdoor Live Entertainment, the Applicant shall submit a “Zoning Clearance for Outdoor Live Entertainment” form along with such information requested on said form.
SECTION 8. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.116.040
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.116.040 is amended to add the following subsection:
L. Outdoor Live Entertainment. All requests for Outdoor Live Entertainment shall be reviewed for compliance with Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment). The zoning clearance approval for Outdoor Live Entertainment shall be a completed “Zoning Clearance for Outdoor Live Entertainment” application form and any pertinent attachments as required on the form with the date and signature of the Community Development Director or his/her designee.
SECTION 9. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 8.116.050
Dublin Municipal Code Section 8.116.050 is amended to add the following subsection:
L. Outdoor Live Entertainment. A Zoning Clearance issued for Outdoor Live Entertainment shall expire when the use is no longer operational.
SECTION 10. POSTING OF ORDINANCE
The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three public spaces in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of 409
Ord. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/2025 Page 5 of 5 California.
SECTION 11. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days following its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY the City Council of the City of Dublin, on this 16th day of December 2025, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
410
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 6.1
DATE: December 2, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT: Amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and Dublin Municipal Code for Outdoor Live Entertainment (PLPA-004212-2025)
Prepared by: Jennifer Byous, Principal Planner and Christine Begin, Assistant Planner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider City-initiated amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) and the Zoning Ordinance to permit Outdoor Live Entertainment as an allowed use.
The proposed amendments include updates to Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), and Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), the addition of Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment), and amendments to DDSP Section 3.4 (Land Use Designations). Staff recommends that the project be found exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct the public hearing, deliberate and: 1) adopt the Resolution Amending the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan To Add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use, and 2) waive the reading and introduce an Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), and the Addition of Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use and Establish Development Standards.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment 2
411
DESCRIPTION:
Background
The overarching vision of the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan (DDSP) is “to create a vibrant, dynamic commercial and mixed-use center that provides a wide array of opportunities for shopping, services, dining, working, living, and entertainment in a pedestrian-friendly and aesthetically pleasing setting that attracts both local and regional residents.” A map of the DDSP area is provided in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Map
On September 19, 2023, the City Council adopted citywide Outdoor Seating Design Guidelines to ensure that outdoor seating is aesthetically pleasing, provides a high-quality environment for patrons, and is appropriately designed for the location. The Design Guidelines encourage creative design while enriching the Dublin community. Since adoption, the City has continued to work with business owners to encourage a mix of complementary land uses, including entertainment, in the Downtown area.
In September 2025, a citywide survey was sent to local business owners to gather input regarding the potential introduction of outdoor live entertainment associated with outdoor dining areas. Results from the survey indicate business owners support outdoor live 412
entertainment downtown. The preferred time for these events is weekend evenings, suggesting a desire to boost after-hours activity.
Staff researched examples of regulations for outdoor live entertainment in other jurisdictions.
Collectively, the jurisdictions surrounding Dublin and others in the San Francisco Bay Area emphasize maintaining neighborhood compatibility through a discretionary or temporary permit process. These approaches provide flexibility for local businesses while ensuring outdoor entertainment activities remain compatible with adjacent residential and mixed-use areas. A summary of these regulations is provided in Attachment 4.
Staff proposes to amend the DDSP and Zoning Ordinance to allow outdoor live entertainment in the Downtown.
Analysis
The following is an overview of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and DDSP. The proposed amendments are intended to further implement the vision of the DDSP and expand opportunities for entertainment while ensuring compatibility with surrounding uses.
The amendments would establish “Outdoor Live Entertainment” as a defined land use and create objective standards and approval procedures.
Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Chapter 8.08 (Definitions)
The amendments introduce a new land use and definition for Outdoor Live Entertainment in Chapter 8.08 (Definitions) as follows:
The term Outdoor Live Entertainment shall mean live entertainment that occurs in outdoor areas, not within a fully enclosed permanent structure, associated with Outdoor Dining.
This includes live music or amplified sound.
Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land) Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land) would be amended to allow Outdoor Live Entertainment in the Downtown Dublin Zoning Districts with a Zoning Clearance or Minor Use Permit (MUP). This approach provides flexibility for smaller-scale, compliant activities to be approved ministerially, while ensuring that larger or potentially impactful activities undergo discretionary review, as further described below.
Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment)
New Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) establishes specific development standards and permitting procedures. The following standards are designed to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, compliance with the Building and Fire Codes, and adherence to the City’s noise regulations in Chapter 5.28:
Location: Permitted within an approved Outdoor Dining area in the Downtown Dublin Zoning Districts.
Hours of Operation: Limited to 10:00 AM – 8:00 PM Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 AM – 10:00 PM Friday and Saturday.
Noise Control: Amplified sound must comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance and be 413
limited to music and human speech.
A streamlined Zoning Clearance process is provided for Outdoor Live Entertainment that meets all development standards. If a proposal cannot meet those standards, a Minor Use Permit is required, allowing Staff to review site-specific considerations such as parking, access, and compatibility with surrounding uses, etc., and apply conditions of approval as necessary to ensure compatibility.
Chapter 8.116.020 (Applications Requiring a Zoning Clearance) Chapter 8.116.020 (Applications Requiring a Zoning Clearance) would be amended to include Outdoor Live Entertainment that meets the standards specified in Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment).
Downtown Dublin Specific Plan Amendments
Corresponding amendments to the DDSP add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an allowed use in the Downtown under Section 3.4 (Land Use Designations) and Table 3-1. This use would be permitted with approval of a Zoning Clearance or Minor Use Permit. These changes are consistent with the Specific Plan’s goals to encourage a mix of complementary land uses - including dining and entertainment—that support an active, pedestrian-oriented downtown.
The proposed amendments provide a clear regulatory framework to facilitate outdoor entertainment activities that enhance the downtown experience, contribute to economic vitality, and align with the vision of the DDSP.
A draft City Council Resolution approving the amendments to the DDSP is included as Attachment 1 and a draft Ordinance approving the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance is included as Attachment 2. A redline version of the proposed changes to the Zoning Ordinance and the DDSP is provided in Attachment 5, where underlined text is proposed to be added and text with a strikethrough is proposed to be deleted.
Consistency with the General Plan, Specific Plans and Zoning Ordinance The proposed Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance Amendments are consistent with the Dublin General Plan in that they support the Plan’s goals to promote a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly, and economically active downtown. By allowing Outdoor Live Entertainment in appropriate locations, the amendments encourage social interaction, enhance the community’s sense of place, and strengthen the mix of complementary land uses envisioned in the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan.
414
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with State Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared. The proposed amends to the DDSP and Zoning Ordinance are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that the amendments will not have a significant effect on the environment. The amendments only clarify and update existing regulations and do not allow new physical development or intensify existing uses. Future projects will remain subject to permitting processes, including compliance with the Noise Ordinance and other applicable standards. Therefore, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA review.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the proposed amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Public testimony was provided by three members of the community who expressed concerns about the proposed hours and the potential for loud noise associated with allowing amplified outdoor live entertainment. The Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council with an added recommendation that the Zoning Clearance include guidance to business owners to monitor noise generated by outdoor entertainment. Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-04 is included as Attachment 3.
In response to the Commission’s recommendation, the draft Ordinance has been revised to reflect the Planning Commission’s recommendation as follows:
8.41.030 (Development Standards and Regulations)
…
C. Amplified Sound. Sound-amplifying equipment shall be limited to music, human speech, or both and be compliant with Dublin Municipal Code Section 5.28 (Noise). Business owners are required to regularly monitor sound levels and take corrective actions as needed to ensure continued compliance with the noise standards.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Strategy 1: Economic Development, Small Business Support, and Downtown Dublin Objective 1A: Support the implementation of the 2024 Economic Development Strategy, including pursuing growth industries.
Objective 1D: Continue to evaluate and implement small business programs that provide financial assistance, business development, permit processing, and support services to the community.
415
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
In accordance with State law, notice was sent to the Tribal Consultation list, and a public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted at several locations throughout the City. A notice of this hearing was also mailed to all property owners and tenants in the DDSP area, those within 300 feet of the DDSP boundaries and to all people who have expressed an interest in being notified of meetings. Additionally, as noted above, a citywide survey was sent to local business owners to gather input regarding the potential introduction of outdoor live entertainment associated with outdoor dining areas. The City Council Agenda was also posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Amending the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use
2) Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Dublin Municipal Code Chapter 8.08 (Definitions), Chapter 8.12 (Zoning Districts and Permitted Uses of Land), Chapter 8.116 (Zoning Clearance), and the Addition of Chapter 8.41 (Outdoor Live Entertainment) to add Outdoor Live Entertainment as an Allowed Use and Establish Development Standards 3) Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-04
4) Table 1- Outdoor Entertainment Regulations: Regional Comparison 5) DDSP Amendments and Dublin Municipal Code Amendments Redlined Pages 6) Noise Ordinance
7) Public Comments
416
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 5.10
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Revisions to the Personnel System
Prepared by: Sarah Monnastes, Human Resources Director/Risk Manager
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider revisions to the City’s Personnel Systems, including the Classification Plan and Salary Plan for Full-Time Employees, to retitle two existing positions and update corresponding job descriptions and salary ranges.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Amending the Classification Plan; and adopt the Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service and for Full-Time Personnel.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The conversion of the Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator into the newly created Parks Planner classification results in an increase of $21,000, or 14%, to the top of the salary range. The cost associated with moving the existing Coordinator into the new position is estimated at $3,900 for the remainder of the current fiscal year. This can be covered within the existing Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget.
DESCRIPTION:
Pursuant to the City’s Personnel System Rules, a job description must be adopted for each classification. Job descriptions outline the essential duties, skills, abilities, and qualifications that comprise the City’s Classification Plan. The Personnel System Rules also require the City Council to adopt a Salary Plan, which is done on an annual basis. This Staff Report outlines proposed updates to the Classification Plan and Salary Plan to reflect organizational and operational needs.
Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer
The job description for the Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer is proposed to be 417
retitled Public Works Director and modernized, including removing the requirement to possess a Professional Engineer (PE) License (Attachment 2).
The City utilizes a combination of in-house professional staff and contracted engineering consultants to perform and review technical engineering work. Over time, the operational needs of the Public Works Department have evolved. As a result, the Director’s responsibilities have increasingly focused on executive leadership, strategic planning, budgeting, policy development, capital program management, and interdepartmental coordination. Removing the PE requirement, modernizing the job descriptions, and retitling the position better aligns the classification with contemporary organizational needs and industry standards, where many agencies distinguish between technical engineering roles and department director functions.
The Salary Plan is also proposed to be amended to reflect the revised position title, but there is no recommended change to the current salary (Attachment 4).
Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator
The job description for the Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator is proposed to be updated and retitled Parks Planner (Attachment 3).
An outside consultant conducted a review of the position and determined that while some components of the core scope of work remain appropriate, the title, salary range, and overall job descriptions should be adjusted to accurately reflect the professional-level responsibilities assigned. The existing title does not fully convey the breadth of duties, which include professional-level park planning and project delivery functions such as overseeing park master planning efforts, coordinating community input processes, managing consultant design teams, developing cost estimates, administering grants, and carrying capital projects from concept through construction administration. These responsibilities mirror those commonly found in parks and open space planning positions. Therefore, Staff recommends adopting the more accurate and industry-standard title of Parks Planner to improve alignment with actual duties and enhance the City’s ability to recruit qualified candidates in the future.
The duties of the position are consistent with responsibilities typically assigned to a Senior Planner rather than to the Associate Planner range to which the role is currently aligned.
Therefore, the Salary Plan is proposed to be amended to retitle the position and place the salary within the Senior Planner salary range (Attachment 4). This change promotes internal equity, reflects the professional expertise required of the position, and strengthens the City’s competitiveness in attracting and retaining qualified candidates in a specialized planning field.
The employee currently holding the Coordinator title will be moved into the new classification, with the salary adjusted accordingly.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
418
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Amending the Classification Plan
2) Exhibit A to the Resolution – Public Works Director Job Description 3) Exhibit B to the Resolution – Parks Planner Job Description 4) Resolution Amending the Salary Plan for Full-Time Personnel and for Positions Exempt from FLSA Overtime Provisions
5) Public Works Director Job Description – redline version 6) Parks Planner Job Description – redline version
419
Attachment 1
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted 12/16/2025 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel System Rules , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent resolutions which comprise the Classification Plan; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to periodically add, remove and/or amend job descriptions in the Classification Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 30 -84 and subsequent resolutions shall be further amended to retitle the Public Works Director/Associate City Engineer to Public Works Director and update the job description (Exhibit A).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 30-84 and subsequent resolutions shall be further amended to retitle the Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator to Parks Planner and update the job description (Exhibit B).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document shall become a part of the official Classification Plan for the City of Dublin; and that the changes contained herein shall be effective December 17, 2025.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
420
Attachment 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Date Adopted: August 24, 1987
Date Revised: August 05, 2003; August 18, 2010; December 16, 2025 FLSA: At-Will, Exempt
General Purpose
Under administrative direction of the City Manager, or designee, the Public Works Director plans, organizes, and directs the activities, operations, and programs of the Public Works Department.
The Director serves as a member of the City’s executive management team at the will of the City Manager.
The Director has full responsibility for the management, planning and supervision of all Public Works programs. Programmatic areas may include maintenance of City streets, parks and trails, buildings, traffic control systems and fleet; the Capital Improvement Program; stormwater, solid waste, recycling, and Climate Action Plan initiatives; as well as development review, permitting, and inspections.
Distinguishing Characteristics
The Public Works Director is an executive management-level classification and serves as Department Head. This position exercises substantial independent judgement and discretion in developing policies, managing resources, overseeing major projects, and ensuring effective coordination across departments and external agencies. The Director has broad administrative and operational authority and is responsible for interpreting related codes, ordinances, and regulations; ensuring compliance with local, state, and federal laws; and resolving complex and sensitive departmental matters. The Director is expected to provide strategic leadership that promotes collaboration, innovation, accountability, and continuous improvement across the organization.
Supervision Received and Exercised
Receives administrative directions from the City Manager or designee. Provides direct supervision to management, professional, technical, and administrative staff.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities
The following duties are typical for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment. Develops, directs, and oversees the implementation of departmental goals, objectives, policies, procedures, and work standards.
421
Provides leadership and strategic guidance for all Public Works service areas and programs. Oversees capital improvement activities at a program level, including long-range planning, project prioritization, budgeting, procurement, design, construction, and interagency coordination.
Serves as a key member of the City’s emergency response structure, including participation in Emergency Operations Center (EOC) activations; may serve as Public Works or Operations Section Chief during major incidents, disasters, or weather events; oversees post-event infrastructure assessment and response activities.
Oversees the development and implementation of the City’s asset management programs, including inventory, condition assessment, lifecycle analysis, and long-term capital renewal forecasting.
Provides oversight of environmental and regulator programs. Promotes and integrates technology solutions, including GIS, work order systems, permitting software, and asset management platforms to enhance operational efficiency, data accuracy, and service delivery.
Collaborates extensively with other City departments, including Community Development, Parks & Community Services, Finance, and the City Manager’s Office, to ensure coordinated project delivery, policy alignment, land development review, and long-range planning efforts. Oversees financial management of the Capital Improvement Program, including multi-year capital planning, grant acquisition and administration, fund compliance, and cost tracking. Manages, negotiates, and evaluates contractor agreements and professional service contracts for cost effectiveness, compliance, and quality of work. Analyzes, develops, and implements long-term maintenance, asset management, and operational strategies for City infrastructure and facilities. Coordinates and collaborates with engineers, consultants, developers, governmental agencies, utilities, and community stakeholders to support City initiatives and project delivery. Provides oversight of engineering activities performed by staff or consulting engineers to ensure technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and alignment with City standards. Ensures compliance with federal, state, and local regulations related to public works operations, environmental requirements, construction activities, and municipal infrastructure. Oversees the preparation, review, and approval of technical documents, engineering plans, studies, and project proposals prepared by staff or consultants. Prepares and presents written and oral reports, recommendations, and technical analyses for the City Manager, City Council, boards, commissions, and committees. Directs the development, preparation, and administration of the department budget; monitors expenditures and ensures alignment with adopted City Council goals and fiscal policies. Provides leadership, direction, mentorship, training, and performance evaluations for assigned staff; promotes a positive, collaborative, and productive work environment. 422
Represents the City and department in meeting with governmental agencies, contractors, vendors, businesses, professional and regulatory organizations, and community groups. Responds to and resolves complex or sensitive public inquiries, service requests, and operational challenges.
Ensures ethical procurement, contract oversight, and adherence to City purchasing policies and public contracting laws.
Leads long-range strategic planning for public infrastructure, including master planning, capital forecasting, and policy development that supports sustainable service delivery and Citywide goals.
Perform other duties as assigned.
Minimum Qualifications
Any combination of education and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities in qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Education:
Equivalent to a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with major course in engineering, public administration, business administration, construction management, urban planning or related field. A master’s degree in an applicable field is highly desirable.
Experience:
Six years of progressively responsible experience in public works operations, municipal administration, project or construction management, or related fields, including at least three years of supervisory and management experience over professional staff.
Knowledge of:
Local, state, and federal laws governing land development, public projects, public infrastructure, and assessment districts.
Modern administrative principles and practices, including goal setting, program development, implementation, and evaluation.
Principles and practices of municipal public works planning, maintenance, engineering, and operations.
Principles and practices of effective employee supervision, including work planning, assignment, review, evaluation, and staff development.
Materials, methods and techniques used in the construction, maintenance, and repair of public infrastructure, including streets, parks, drainage systems, stormwater systems, and traffic control devices.
423
Applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, regulations, and environmental compliance requirements.
Budget development, financial analysis, cost control and procurement practices. Effective methods of representing the City to government agencies, developers, contractors, community groups, and professional and legislative organizations.
Ability to:
Plan, organize, and direct the activities and operations of the Public Works Department. Develop and implement goals, objectives, policies, procedures, work standards, and internal controls.
Interpret, apply, and ensure compliance with a wide range of laws, regulations, policies, codes and standards.
Provide effective leadership and oversight of management, supervisory, professional, and technical personnel.
Exercise sound judgement and make responsible decisions under pressure and within established deadlines.
Prepare and present clear, concise, and accurate reports, proposals, and presentations. Conduct effective negotiations and represent the City in a wide variety of meetings, proceedings, and public forums.
Build and maintain effective working relationships with City staff, elected officials, contractors, vendors, and the community.
Demonstrate tact and good judgment in dealing with sensitive issues and situations. Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.
Work Environment
Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with frequent use of computers and other office equipment. This position also requires occasional fieldwork which may involve exposure to varying weather conditions, noise, dust, fumes, odors, uneven surfaces, construction hazards, or moving equipment. This position involves frequent interaction with elected officials, contractors, consultants, community groups, and members of the public, including individuals who may be upset or frustrated when discussing or interpreting policies and regulations.
The employee may be required to work evenings, weekends, holidays, and extended hours to meet City operational needs, respond to emergencies, or attend meetings. Field duties may require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hats, safety vests, eye protection, and hearing protection during construction site visits. The employee must be able to respond to emergency incidents or infrastructure failures outside of normal working hours.
Physical Requirements
424
The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met to perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
Sit, stand, and walk for extended periods in both office and field environments. Communicate effectively in person, by telephone, virtually, and in meetings. Use hands and fingers to operate computers, office equipment, and occasionally field tools used during site visits.
Bend, stoop, kneel, climb, or crouch occasionally when accessing project areas or conducting site inspections.
Lift, carry, or transport materials or equipment weighing up to 25 pounds on an occasional basis.
Navigate active construction sites, uneven terrain, and areas with potential exposure to traffic, heavy equipment, vibration, loud noise, dust, or other environmental hazards while following appropriate safety protocols.
Safely operate a motor vehicle and travel to various City or community locations. Maintain sufficient vision, hearing, and communication abilities necessary to safely perform field and office duties.
Licenses, Certificates and Special Requirements
Possession of a valid California Class C driver’s license and proof of automobile liability insurance.
Equal Opportunity Statement
The City of Dublin is an equal opportunity employer committed to building a diverse and inclusive workforce. We encourage applications from all qualified individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion or veteran status. Accommodations are available upon request during the selection process.
425
Attachment 3
Exhibit B to the Resolution
PARKS PLANNER
Date Adopted: July 17, 2001
Date Revised: December 16, 2025
FLSA: Exempt
General Purpose
Under general supervision, plans, organizes, coordinates, and implements programs and activities in support of capital improvement projects for City parks and community facilities. Duties include reviewing plans, specifications, and technical documents; managing the work of outside consultants and contractors; performing complex cost and feasibility analysis, and monitoring the progress of multiple concurrent projects from concept through construction.
Distinguishing Characteristics
The Parks Planner is a single-level professional classification responsible for coordinating complex projects involving parks, landscaped areas, and community facilities. The position integrates a broad range of technical functions and coordinates with multiple stakeholders, including consultants, contractors, and internal staff, engaged in the design, development, renovation and construction of municipal amenities. Assignments include both landscape-focused and architectural/building-related project areas, such as facility renovations, building improvements, master planning, feasibility studies, and the enhancement of public spaces.
Supervision Received and Exercised
Receives general supervision from the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Manager. Provides project leadership and oversight to consultants, contractors, and may provide task- level guidance to internal staff. This classification is not typically assigned ongoing supervisory responsibilities.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
The following duties are typical for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment. Serve as project coordinator for parks, landscaping, and community facility capital improvement projects from concept through construction, including scope development, scheduling, budgeting, consultant selection, design review, and project closeout. Facilitate community engagement processes, including developing and implementing outreach strategies to ensure inclusive participation; lead public workshops and meetings; and present project updates to the Parks Commission, City Council, community groups and other stakeholders.
426
Provide administrative and technical assistance to the CIP Manager, including conducting needs assessments and developing recommendations based on user and community input. Coordinate with City departments and outside agencies in the development of master planning documents and feasibility studies.
Oversee and evaluate the work of consultants and contractors involved in design, construction management, and inspection to ensure compliance with City standards, contract requirements, and project objectives.
Select, negotiate, and administer consultant and contractor agreements; prepare and manage amendments, task orders, and change orders; and evaluate performance. Collaborate with City staff in reviewing development plans and park development agreement documents associated with future public facilities.
Evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of proposed capital improvement projects and make recommendations to the CIP Manager and other departments. Prepare, submit, and administer grant applications and manage grant-funded projects, including tracking deliverables, compliance monitoring, reporting, and documentation with funding requirements.
Maintain current knowledge of industry standards, regulations, and best practices related to park planning, community facility development, public project delivery, environmental requirements, and design/construction methods.
Prepare and deliver clear and comprehensive written and oral reports, staff presentations, and technical documents.
Build and maintain effective working relationships with co-workers, other City staff, elected officials, contractors, consultants, community partners, and the public, using principles of effective communication and customer service.
Perform other duties as assigned.
Minimum Qualifications
Any combination of education and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities in qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Education:
Equivalent to graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in park planning and design, landscape architecture, urban planning, public administration, or a closely related field. A master’s degree is desirable.
Experience:
427
Five years of progressively responsible experience, preferably in a public agency, involving direct responsibility for the planning, design, or development of public facilities. Experience in landscape architecture and/or park and community facility planning is desirable.
Knowledge of:
Principles, practices, and methods of planning, designing, and developing municipal parks, landscaped areas, community facilities, and related public improvements, including architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, irrigation, accessibility, and site design components.
Construction and maintenance principles, methods, materials, and equipment used in public works and facility development.
Principles and practices of contract administration, budgeting, fiscal tracking, project accounting, and recordkeeping.
CEQA process, statutes, regulations, and related environmental requirements applicable to capital projects.
Federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and court decisions related to assigned responsibility.
Principles and practices of project management, community engagement, and public communication.
Grant development, application, administration, and reporting requirements. Modern software applications related to project management, budgeting, GIS mapping, CAD or design review, and document management.
Ability to:
Review, analyze, and interpret technical reports, plans, development agreements, master planning documents, and calculations, and provide clear and actionable recommendations. Lead and coordinate the work of consultants, contractors, and multidisciplinary project teams. Prepare and deliver professional written and oral presentations to commissions, elected bodies, and the public.
Manage multiple projects simultaneously while meeting deadlines and adjusting to changing priorities.
Build and maintain effective working relationships with elected officials, staff, contractors, consultants, and community members.
Exercise sound judgment within established procedures and professional standards. Prepare, review, and interpret plans, specifications, and design documents to ensure compliance with standards, codes, and regulations, and to evaluate constructability and cost impacts.
428
Maintain accurate records and documentation for project development, reporting, and implementation.
Provide excellent customer service when interacting with staff, consultants, project partners, and the public.
Work Environment
Work is performed primarily in a standard office setting with frequent use of computers and other office equipment. The position also requires occasional fieldwork which may involve exposure to varying weather conditions, noise, dust, fumes, odors, uneven surfaces, construction hazards, or moving equipment. Employees may interact with contractors, consultants, and members of the public, including individuals who may be upset or frustrated when discussing or interpreting policies and regulations. The employee may be required to work evenings, weekends, and/or extending hours to meet City operational needs or attend meetings. Field duties may require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hats, safety vests, eye protection, and hearing protection during construction site visits.
Physical Requirements
The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met to perform the essential functions of this position. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. Sit, stand, and walk for extended periods while performing both office and field duties. Communicate effectively in person, by telephone, virtually, and in meetings. Use hands and fingers to operate computers, office equipment, and basic field tools; reach with hands and arms as required.
Bend, stoop, kneel, climb, or crouch occasionally when accessing project areas or conducting site inspections.
Lift, carry or transport materials or equipment weighing up to 25 pounds on an occasional basis.
Safely operate a motor vehicle and travel to various City or community locations. Maintain sufficient vision, hearing, and communication abilities necessary to safely perform field and office duties, sometimes in environments with moderate noise or distractions.
Licenses, Certificates and Special Requirements
Possession of a valid California Class C drivers' license and proof of automobile liability insurance.
Registration as a Landscape Architect in State of California is desirable.
Equal Opportunity Statement
429
The City of Dublin is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to building a diverse and inclusive workforce. We encourage applications from all qualified individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion, or veteran status. Accommodations are available upon request during the selection process.
430
Attachment 4
Reso. No. XX-25, Item X.X, Adopted 12/16/25 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SALARY PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS EXEMPT
FROM COMPETITIVE SERVICE AND FOR FULL-TIME PERSONNEL
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City’s Personnel Syst em Rules, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 65-25 and 63-25 and subsequent Resolutions which establish a Salary Plan for full-time personnel.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I T RESOLVED that the position of Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer be retitled to Public Works Director under Article I, Section A of the Salary Plan for Management Positions Exempt from Competitive Service.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV ED that the position of Parks & Facilities Development Coordinator be retitled to Parks Planner under Article I, Section A of the Salary Plan for Full - Time Personnel Exempt from Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Overtime Provisions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV ED that the following position shall be paid an hourly rate within the following salary range with the exclusi on of any Performance Pay Adjustment granted in accordance with the adopted Personnel Rules:
Monthly
Minimum
Monthly
Maximum
Parks Planner $11,266.19 $14,083.85
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV ED that this document shall become a part of the official Salary Plan for the City of Dublin; and that the changes contained herein shall be effective December 17, 2025.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Dublin this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Clerk
431
Attachment 5
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Date Adopted: 8- August 24-, 1987
Date Revised: 8-5-August 05, 2003 & 5-; August 18-, 2010 ; December 16, 2025
Title: Public Works Director/Assistant City Engineer
FLSA: At-Will, Exempt
General Purpose:
The Public Works Director is a Department Head, under theUnder administrative direction of the City Manager, or his/her designee. This position is responsible for, the Public Works Director plans, organizes, and directs the managementactivities, operations, and supervisionprograms of the Public Works and Engineering functions including street maintenance, landscape maintenance, street tree maintenance, park maintenance, street sweeping, traffic engineering, subdivision and private development plan checking, capital improvement project planning and design and public works inspection.Department.
The Director serves as a member of the City’s executive management team at the will of the City Manager.
The Director has Distinguishing Characteristics:
This is an Executive Management/Department Head class with full responsibility for the management of multiple function service delivery, planning and supervision of all Public Works programs. Programmatic areas within the may include maintenance of City. Reports to streets, parks and trails, buildings, traffic control systems and fleet; the Capital Improvement Program; stormwater, solid waste, recycling, and Climate Action Plan initiatives; as well as development review, permitting, and inspections.
432
Distinguishing Characteristicsreceives direction
The Public Works Director is an executive management-level classification and serves as Department Head. This position exercises substantial independent judgement and discretion in developing policies, managing resources, overseeing major projects, and ensuring effective coordination across departments and external agencies. The Director has broad administrative and operational authority and is responsible for interpreting related codes, ordinances, and regulations; ensuring compliance with local, state, and federal laws; and resolving complex and sensitive departmental matters. The Director is expected to provide strategic leadership that promotes collaboration, innovation, accountability, and continuous improvement across the organization.
Supervision Received and Exercised
• Receives administrative directions from the City Manager or his/her designee. Employees at this level receive administrative direction from the City Manager in terms of goals. Department Head positions are reviewed in terms of results.
• Provides direct supervision of management, professional, technical, and administrative staff.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
The following duties are normaltypical for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment to this class.
• SupervisesDevelops, directs, and oversees the administration of the implementation of departmental goals, objectives, policies, procedures, and work standards. • Provides leadership and strategic guidance for all Public Works Department ofservice areas and programs.
• Oversees capital improvement activities at a program level, including long-range planning, project prioritization, budgeting, procurement, design, construction, and interagency coordination. • Serves as a key member of the City’s emergency response structure, including participation in Emergency Operations Center (EOC) activations; may serve as Public Works or Operations Section Chief during major incidents, disasters, or weather events; oversees post-event infrastructure assessment and response activities.
• Oversees the City. development and implementation of the City’s asset management programs, including inventory, condition assessment, lifecycle analysis, and long-term capital renewal forecasting.
433
• Submits reportsProvides oversight of environmental and recommendationsregulator programs. • Promotes and integrates technology solutions, including GIS, work order systems, permitting software, and asset management platforms to the enhance operational efficiency, data accuracy, and service delivery.
• Collaborates extensively with other City Managerdepartments, including Community Development, Parks & Community Services, Finance, and the City Council. Manager’s Office, to ensure coordinated project delivery, policy alignment, land development review, and long-range planning efforts.
Reviews and approves engineering plans, specifications, contract documents, and subdivision maps.
• Coordinates related activitiesOversees financial management of the Capital Improvement Program, including multi-year capital planning, grant acquisition and administration, fund compliance, and cost tracking.
Manages, negotiates, and provides technical assistance to other departments, public agencies, consultants and contractors.
Makes presentations on department activities, engineering designs, and related matters to the City Council, Planning Commission and other groups.
Analyzes short-term and long-term maintenance programs.
Prepares and reviews budget proposals for department needs consistent with adopted City Council goals and objectives.
Supervises and coordinatesevaluates contractor agreements and activities which may include: street maintenance, street sweeping, landscape maintenance, supplemental engineering services, park maintenance, and capital improvement projects.
434
• Evaluates all public worksprofessional service contracts for cost effectiveness, compliance, and quality of work performance..
Provides supervision and training of subordinate professional, technical, and clerical staff.
Other duties as required.
Analyzes, develops,Minimum Qualifications:
Knowledge of:
Local and state laws governing land development, public projects and assessment districts.
• Techniques and materials commonly employed in the constructionimplements long-term maintenance, asset management, and maintenance of public projects including streets, parks, drainage operational strategies for City infrastructure and facilities, and traffic controls; principles of supervision.
• Coordinates and collaborates with engineers, consultants, developers, governmental agencies, utilities, and community stakeholders to support City initiatives and project delivery. • Provides oversight of engineering activities performed by staff or consulting engineers to ensure technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and alignment with City standards. • Ensures compliance with federal, state, and local regulations related to public works operations, environmental requirements, construction activities, and municipal infrastructure. • Oversees the preparation, review, and approval of technical documents, engineering plans, studies, and project proposals prepared by staff or consultants. • Prepares and presents written and oral reports, recommendations, and technical analyses for the City Manager, City Council, boards, commissions, and committees. • Directs the development, preparation, and administration; of the department budget; monitors expenditures and ensures alignment with adopted City Council goals and fiscal policies. • Provides leadership, direction, mentorship, training, and performance evaluations for assigned staff; promotes a positive, collaborative, and productive work environment. • Represents the City and department in meeting with governmental agencies, contractors, vendors, businesses, professional and regulatory organizations, and community groups. 435
• Responds to and resolves complex or sensitive public inquiries, service requests, and operational challenges.
• Ensures ethical procurement, contract oversight, and adherence to City purchasing policies and public contracting laws.
• Leads long-range strategic planning for public infrastructure, including master planning, capital forecasting, and policy development that supports sustainable service delivery and Citywide goals.
• Perform other duties as assigned.
Minimum Qualifications
Any combination of education and experience that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities in qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Education:
Equivalent to a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with major course in engineering, public administration, business administration, construction management, urban planning or related field. A master’s degree in an applicable field is highly desirable.
Experience:
Six years of progressively responsible experience in public works operations, municipal administration, project or construction management, or related fields, including at least three years of supervisory and management experience over professional staff.
Knowledge of:Techniques used to develop maintenance programs and budgets. • Local, state, and federal laws governing land development, public projects, public infrastructure, and assessment districts.
• Modern administrative principles and practices, including goal setting, program development, implementation, and evaluation.
• Principles and practices of municipal public works planning, maintenance, engineering, and operations.
• Principles and practices of effective employee supervision, including work planning, assignment, review, evaluation, and staff development.
436
• Materials, methods and techniques used in the construction, maintenance, and repair of public infrastructure, including streets, parks, drainage systems, stormwater systems, and traffic control devices.
• Applicable federal, state, and local laws, codes, regulations, and environmental compliance requirements.
• Budget development, financial analysis, cost control and procurement practices. • Effective methods of representing the City to government agencies, developers, contractors, community groups, and professional and legislative organizations.
Ability Toto:
Plan, organize, and direct the activities of the department.
• Deal effectively with representatives from public and private agencies and the general public in coordinating activities and resolving problemsoperations of the Public Works Department.
• Develop and implement goals, objectives, policies, procedures, work standards, and plans; coordinateinternal controls.
• Interpret, apply, and supervise contractor activities; perform engineering work expectedensure compliance with a wide range of a registered civil engineer. laws, regulations, policies, codes and standards.
• PresentProvide effective leadership and oversight of management, supervisory, professional, and technical personnel.
• Exercise sound judgement and make responsible decisions under pressure and within established deadlines.
• Prepare and present clear and, concise verbal, and writtenaccurate reports, proposals, and recommendations.presentations.
Deal effectively with representatives of other departments.
Effectively direct the activities of subordinate employees. 437
• Conduct effective negotiations and represent the City in a wide variety of meetings, proceedings, and public forums.
• Build and maintain effective working relationships with City staff, elected officials, contractors, vendors, and the community.
• Demonstrate tact and good judgment in dealing with sensitive issues and situations. • Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.
Work Environment
Work is performed primarily in a standard office environment with frequent use of computers and other office equipment. This position also requires occasional fieldwork which may involve exposure to varying weather conditions, noise, dust, fumes, odors, uneven surfaces, construction hazards, or moving equipment. This position involves frequent interaction with elected officials, contractors, consultants, community groups, and members of the public, including individuals who may be upset or frustrated when discussing or interpreting policies and regulations.
The employee may be required to work evenings, weekends, holidays, and extended hours to meet City operational needs, respond to emergencies, or attend meetings. Field duties may require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hats, safety vests, eye protection, and hearing protection during construction site visits. The employee must be able to respond to emergency incidents or infrastructure failures outside of normal working hours.
Physical Standards:Requirements
The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfullyto perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
• An employee is regularly required to sit Sit, stand, and walk for longextended periods of time; talk or hear,in both office and field environments.
• Communicate effectively in person, in meetings and by telephone; use, virtually, and in meetings.
• Use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standardcomputers, office equipment; and reach, and occasionally field tools used during site visits. • Bend, stoop, kneel, climb, or crouch occasionally when accessing project areas or conducting site inspections.
438
• Lift, carry, or transport materials or equipment weighing up to 25 pounds on an occasional basis.
• Navigate active construction sites, uneven terrain, and areas with hands and arms. The employee is frequently requiredpotential exposure to, bend and twist to reach files, walk and stand. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written traffic, heavy equipment, vibration, loud noise, dust, or other environmental hazards while following appropriate safety protocols.
• Safely operate a motor vehicle and oral travel to various City or community locations. • Maintain sufficient vision, hearing, and communication skills; give public presentations; read and interpret complex data, information and documents; analyze and solve problems; use a computer to prepare reports; interact with City management, other governmental officials, contractors, vendors, employees and the public.abilities necessary to safely perform field and office duties.
Training and Experience:
Any combination equivalent to education and experience is likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Education: The equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university in Civil Engineering or a related field. A Masters degree in an applicable field is highly desirable.
Experience: A minimum of five years of full -time increasingly responsible professional civil engineering experience involving the design, construction and maintenance of public works facilities, including three years in a supervisory capacity.
Certification: Registration in the State of California as a Professional Civil Engineer is highly desirable. Registration in the State of California as Land Surveyor is desirable, if civil engineering license does not cover land surveying.
Licenses: , Certificates and Special Requirements
• Possession of a valid Class C California Drivers’ License,Class C driver’s license and Certificateproof of Automobile Insurance for Personal Liability. automobile liability insurance. 439
Equal Opportunity Statement
The City of Dublin is an equal opportunity employer committed to building a diverse and inclusive workforce. We encourage applications from all qualified individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion or veteran status. Accommodations are available upon request during the selection process.
440
Attachment 6
PARKS PLANNER
Date Adopted: July 17-, 2001
Date Revised: _______December 16, 2025
Title: Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator
FLSA: Exempt
General Purpose:
Under general supervision, plans, organizes, coordinates, and integrates theimplements programs and activities in support of capital improvement projects for City parks and community facilities, including performing complex analysis. Duties include reviewing plans, specifications, and technical documents; managing the work of project costs and monitoring project progress. outside consultants and contractors; performing complex cost and feasibility analysis, and monitoring the progress of multiple concurrent projects from concept through construction.
Distinguishing Characteristics:
With general supervision from the The Parks and Facilities Development Manager,Planner is a single-level professional classification responsible for integrating a wide variety of functions, programs,coordinating complex projects involving parks, landscaped areas, and community facilities. The position integrates a broad range of technical functions and coordinates with multiple stakeholders, including consultants, contractors, and internal staff, engaged in the design, development, renovation and construction of recreation, park and other municipal facilities. amenities. Assignments include both landscape-focused and architectural/building-related project areas, such as facility renovations, building improvements, master planning, feasibility studies, and the enhancement of public spaces. 441
Supervision Received and Exercised
• Receives general supervision from the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Manager. • Provides project leadership and oversight to consultants, contractors, and may provide task-level guidance to internal staff. This classification is not typically assigned ongoing supervisory responsibilities.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
Under supervision, serves as project coordinator for capital improvement projects in the City. The incumbent is responsible for coordinating specific segments of assignments/projects that may include park improvements and expansion projects, development o f improved and new community facilities, and key public facilities offering recreational, cultural and human services to the community.
Provides administrative and technical assistance to the Parks and Facilities Development Manager in defining user and community needs for capital improvements and developing strategies for implementation.
Works with contractors and consultants performing all types of construction management and inspection activities to ensure construction practices are in compliance with City standards. Directs and coordinates activities of project to ensure project progresses on schedule and within prescribed budget, modifies schedules or plans as required.
Assists in analyzing the feasibility of proposed capital improvement projects and makes appropriate recommendations to the Parks and Facilities Development Manager and other City departments regarding project viability.
Under the direct supervision of the Parks and Facilities Development Manager, prepares and supervises the preparation of specifications and bidding documents for the design, construction, renovation and landscaping of the City’s parks, recreation and munic ipal facilities; drafts Requests for Proposals for consultant services required to develop and complete projects; solicits, reviews and recommends award of contracts; evaluates the work of contractors.
Maintains records and prepares a variety of reports. Responds to inquiries regarding the status of projects.
Develops and disseminates informational materials.
442
Maintains current knowledge of new techniques in landscape architecture, planning, and design.
Advises City staff regarding the care and maintenance of landscape architectural projects and equipment.
May assist supervisor by planning work assignments and providing instructions to other employees.
The following duties are typical for this classification. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment to this class.
Minimum Qualifications:
• Serve as project coordinator for parks, landscaping, and community facility capital improvement projects from concept through construction, including scope development, scheduling, budgeting, consultant selection, design review, and project closeout. • Facilitate community engagement processes, including developing and implementing outreach strategies to ensure inclusive participation; lead public workshops and meetings; and present project updates to the Parks Commission, City Council, community groups and other stakeholders.
• Provide administrative and technical assistance to the CIP Manager, including conducting needs assessments and developing recommendations based on user and community input.
Coordinate with City departments Knowledge of:
Principles, practices, techniques and methods of municipal buildings and facilities development including landscape architectural planning, design and maintenance.
Principles and practices of construction and maintenance methods, material and equipment.
Principles and practices of contract and fiscal administration in a public agency.
443
CEQA environmental process, statutes, regulations and internal standards as applied to public capital projects.
Modern principles and practices used in acquisition, master planning, designing, project management, and construction management of public capital improvements.
Computer software applications, including word processing, budgetary, project cost management and scheduling programs.
Public park, recreation, building and facilities systems, including but not limited to mechanical, plumbing and irrigation, electrical, security, communications and data, parking, public access, landscape planning, ADA and handicapped improvements.
Federal, state and local laws, regulations and court decisions applicable to assigned areas of responsibility.
Principles and practices of budgeting, purchasing and maintenance of public records.
Park and recreation facility design.
Research methods and analysis techniques.
Principles and practices of sound business communications.
Community outreach strategies.
Ability To:
• Work in a team environment that includes City staff and outside agencies in the development of master planning documents and feasibility studies.
444
• Oversee and evaluate the work of consultants and contractors involved in design, construction management, and inspection to ensure compliance with City standards, contract requirements, and project objectives.
• EstablishSelect, negotiate, and administer consultant and contractor agreements; prepare and manage amendments, task orders, and change orders; and evaluate performance. • Collaborate with City staff in reviewing development plans and park development agreement documents associated with future public facilities.
• Evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of proposed capital improvement projects and make recommendations to the CIP Manager and other departments. • Prepare, submit, and administer grant applications and manage grant-funded projects, including tracking deliverables, compliance monitoring, reporting, and documentation with funding requirements.
• Maintain current knowledge of industry standards, regulations, and best practices related to park planning, community facility development, public project delivery, environmental requirements, and design/construction methods.
• Prepare and deliver clear and comprehensive written and oral reports, staff presentations, and technical documents.
Build and maintain effective working relationships with management, subordinates, co-workers, consultants, contractors, representatives of other agencies, the general public, using customer service and public relations techniques.
Express ideas effectively in comprehensive written and oral presentations.
Exercise sound judgment within established programs and procedural guidelines.
Manage multiple projects simultaneously and be sensitive to deadlines and changing priorities.
Establish and maintain the necessary record keeping systems for management of facility and park development program.
Prepare, review and interpret designs, plans and specifications for compliance with current standards, law, codes and regulations for solutions to problems, cost estimating and constructability. 445
Physical Standards:
The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met by employees to successfully perform the essential functions of this class. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
• An employee is regularly required to sit for long periods of time; talk or hear, in person, in meetings and by telephone; use hands and fingers to handle, feel or operate standard office equipment; and reach with hands and arms. The employee is frequently required to, bend and twist to reach files, walk and stand. While performing duties, the employee is regularly required to use written and oral communication skills; read and interpret complex data, information and documents; operate an automobile to visit project site and move across rough terrain and bridge scaffolding to review construction sites prior to final completion; analyze and solve problems; interact with City management, other governmentalother City staff, elected officials, contractors, vendors, employees and the publicconsultants, community partners, and the public, using principles of effective communication and customer service.
• Perform other duties as assigned.
Minimum Qualifications
Training and Experience:
Any combination equivalent to of education and experience is that would likely to provide the required knowledge and abilities. in qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Education: Graduation
Equivalent to
graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in park planning and design, landscape architecture, urban planning, public administration, or a closely related field.
A Master’smaster’s degree is desirable.
446
Experience: Two
Five years of progressively responsible experience, preferably in a public agency with, involving direct project experience managing responsibility for the planning, design, or development of public facilities.
Experience in landscape architecture and/or park and community facility planning is desirable.
Knowledge of:
• Principles, practices, and methods of planning, designing, and developing municipal parks, landscaped areas, community facilities, and related public improvements, including architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, irrigation, accessibility, and site design components. • Construction and maintenance principles, methods, materials, and equipment used in public works and facility development.
• Principles and practices of contract administration, budgeting, fiscal tracking, project accounting, and recordkeeping.
• CEQA process, statutes, regulations, and related environmental requirements applicable to capital projects.
• Federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and court decisions related to assigned responsibility. • Principles and practices of project management, community engagement, and public communication.
• Grant development, application, administration, and reporting requirements. • Modern software applications related to project management, budgeting, GIS mapping, CAD or design review, and document management.
Ability to:
• Review, analyze, and interpret technical reports, plans, development agreements, master planning documents, and calculations, and provide clear and actionable recommendations. • Lead and coordinate the work is desired. of consultants, contractors, and multidisciplinary project teams.
• Prepare and deliver professional written and oral presentations to commissions, elected bodies, and the public.
• Manage multiple projects simultaneously while meeting deadlines and adjusting to changing priorities.
447
• Build and maintain effective working relationships with elected officials, staff, contractors, consultants, and community members.
• Exercise sound judgment within established procedures and professional standards. • Prepare, review, and interpret plans, specifications, and design documents to ensure compliance with standards, codes, and regulations, and to evaluate constructability and cost impacts. • Maintain accurate records and documentation for project development, reporting, and implementation.
• Provide excellent customer service when interacting with staff, consultants, project partners, and the public.
Work Environment
Work is performed primarily in a standard office setting with frequent use of computers and other office equipment. The position also requires occasional fieldwork which may involve exposure to varying weather conditions, noise, dust, fumes, odors, uneven surfaces, construction hazards, or moving equipment. Employees may interact with contractors, consultants, and members of the public, including individuals who may be upset or frustrated when discussing or interpreting policies and regulations. The employee may be required to work evenings, weekends, and/or extending hours to meet City operational needs or attend meetings. Field duties may require the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hard hats, safety vests, eye protection, and hearing protection during construction site visits.
Physical Requirements
The physical standards described are representative of those that must be met to perform the essential functions of this position. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
• Sit, stand, and walk for extended periods while performing both office and field duties. • Communicate effectively in person, by telephone, virtually, and in meetings. • Use hands and fingers to operate computers, office equipment, and basic field tools; reach with hands and arms as required.
• Bend, stoop, kneel, climb, or crouch occasionally when accessing project areas or conducting site inspections.
• Lift, carry or transport materials or equipment weighing up to 25 pounds on an occasional basis.
• Safely operate a motor vehicle and travel to various City or community locations. • Maintain sufficient vision, hearing, and communication abilities necessary to safely perform field and office duties, sometimes in environments with moderate noise or distractions. 448
Licenses;, Certificates; and Special Requirements:
• Possession of a valid California Class C drivers’ drivers' license and Certificate of Automobile Insurance for Personal Liability. and proof of automobile liability insurance.
• RegisteredRegistration as a Landscape Architect in State of California is desirable.
Equal Opportunity Statement
The City of Dublin is an Equal Opportunity Employer committed to building a diverse and inclusive workforce. We encourage applications from all qualified individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, religion, or veteran status. Accommodations are available upon request during the selection process.
449
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 8.1
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Presentation of the Outdoor Flag Display Policy
Prepared by: Jordan Foss, Senior Management Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive a presentation on the City of Dublin’s Outdoor Flag Display Policy, established by City Council Resolution No. 56-19 on June 4, 2019. The policy provides standards and procedures for the display of the United States Flag, the California State Flag, the City of Dublin Flag, and any commemorative flags authorized by the City Council. This presentation also summarizes the City’s operating practices for lowering flags to half-staff.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the presentation.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No financial impact with receiving the presentation.
DESCRIPTION:
During Item 9 of the September 16, 2025 meeting, the City Council requested an informational item be brought back to the City Council on the City’s Outdoor Flag Display Policy, and practices for lowering the flags to half-staff.
Background
On June 4, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 56-19, establishing the City’s Outdoor Flag Display Policy. The policy governs how flags are displayed at City facilities, including the United States Flag, the California State Flag, and the City of Dublin Flag. It also provides standards for the occasional display of commemorative flags at the Dublin Civic Center, as approved by the City Council.
The City of Dublin displays outdoor flags at the following City facilities and parks:
Civic Center
450
Corporation Yard
Don Biddle Community Park
Dublin Sports Grounds
Fallon Sports Park
Fire Stations 16, 17, and 18
Heritage Park and Museums (only used on occasion)
Public Safety Complex (Fire Administration and Police Services have separate poles) Senior Center
Shannon Community Center
The Wave Waterpark and Aquatic Center
Policy Overview
The Outdoor Flag Display Policy (Attachment 1) outlines the following key provisions:
Display Standards
Flags shall be displayed in accordance with federal and state statutes, including Title 4, Chapter 1 of the U.S. Code and California Government Code Sections 430–439. The United States Flag shall always be flown in the position of highest honor, either alone or alongside the California and City of Dublin flags. Flags may be flown 24 hours a day if properly illuminated during darkness and may be displayed in all weather conditions if constructed of all-weather material.
Commemorative Flags
Commemorative flags may only be displayed if authorized by the City Council at a duly noticed meeting.
Requests to display commemorative flags must be made by a member of the City Council.
Such flags may be flown for a reasonable period, not to exceed 31 days, and only at the Dublin Civic Center.
Operating Practices For Lowering Flags To Half-Staff
In addition to the adopted policy, City staff follow established operating practices for lowering flags to half-staff in observance of federal or state orders of mourning. The City follows the United States Flag Code (Title 4, U.S. Code, Chapter 1), which provides guidelines for displaying and caring for the American flag, including when it should be flown at half-staff.
Additionally, the City honors established annual federal days of recognition, including:
National Firefighters Memorial Day – May 4
Peace Officers Memorial Day – May 15
Memorial Day – last Monday in May
Patriot Day – September 11
Korean War Veterans Armistice Day – July 27
Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day – December 7
Furthermore, the City also honors the death of national or state leaders as outlined in the US 451
Flag Code, such as:
The President or former President – 30 days from the date of death. Upon the death of the Vice President, Chief Justice, or Speaker of the House – 10 days from the date of death.
Upon the death of an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, a Cabinet member, a U.S. Senator, Representative, or Territorial Delegate, or a Governor – from the day of death until interment.
Upon Presidential proclamation or gubernatorial order for other tragic events or the death of public servants or military personnel.
These observances serve as a symbol of mourning and respect, and the City follows official notifications and/or the US Flag Code to ensure the flag is displayed in accordance with protocol.
The City’s practice for lowering the flag to half-staff is as follows:
The City’s Communications Manager receives notifications through a flag status alert service that tracks proclamations issued by the President of the United States, the Governor of California, and other designated authorities. Upon receiving such notification, the Communications Manager notifies the appropriate maintenance staff, as well as the City Manager, of the order to lower flags. The Communications Manager publishes a News Flash on the City website about the flag lowering. The News Flash stays public until the flag is raised. City maintenance staff promptly lower the flags at the Dublin Civic Center and other City facilities and parks to half-staff in accordance with the guidance provided in the alert. o Flags are lowered to half-staff by Alameda County Fire Department at the three City Fire Stations and the Fire Administration building at the Public Safety Complex.
Flags remain at half-staff for the duration specified in the official proclamation, after which maintenance staff return them to full staff.
This process ensures the City’s compliance with federal and state protocols and maintains uniform observance across City facilities.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution No. 56-19 – Establishing the City of Dublin Outdoor Flag Display Policy 2) US Flag Code (4. U.S. Code §7)
452
RESOLUTION NO. 56 — 19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF DUBLIN OUTDOOR FLAG DISPLAY POLICY WHEREAS, the City of Dublin displays the United States Flag, the California State Flag, and the City of Dublin Flag at the Dublin Civic Center; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin does not have a policy regarding the display of such flags or the display of any commemorative flags; and
WHEREAS, at its May 21, 2019 meeting, the City Council directed Staff to bring a flag display policy for City Council consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish a policy that provides guidance and standards for the outdoor display of flags at City facilities, including commemorative flags other than the United States, California, and City flags.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin hereby adopts the Outdoor Flag Display Policy attached hereto as Exhibit A.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June 2019, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Goel, Hernandez, Josey, Kumagai, and Mayor Haubert NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ayor
ATTEST:
auf, e
City Clerk
Reso 55- 19, Adopted 6/ 4/ 2019, Item 7. 1 Page 1 of 1
Attachment 1
453
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF DUBLIN
OUTDOOR FLAG DISPLAY POLICY
Background:
The Dublin City Council desires to establish a policy regarding: ( 1) the outdoor display of the United StatesFlag, the California StateFlag, and the City of Dublin Flag at City facilities; and 2) the outdoor display of commemorative flags at the Dublin Civic Center.
In adopting this policy, the City Council declaresthat the City of Dublin’s flagpoles are not intended to serve as a forum for free expression of the public, but rather for the display of Federal, State, and City Flags, and any commemorative flag asmay be authorized by the City Council as an expression of the City Council’ s official sentiments.
Purpose:
The purpose of this policy is to provide procedural guidance for the outdoor display of flags at City facilities. Nothing in this policy is intended to control the City’s indoor display of flags, including commemorative flags, within City facilities.
Policy:
I. Standards
Flags shall be displayed in accordancewith Federal and Statestatutes, including, but not limited to, Title 4, Chapter 1 of the United States Code and Sections 430 through 439 of the California Government Code, and this policy.
II. Procedure
A. United StatesFlag, California StateFlag, and City of Dublin Flag
1. No other flag shall be placed above the United States Flag and no other flag shall be larger than the United StatesFlag. Other flags may be flown at the same height and in the same size, in accordance with this policy.
Where both the United StateFlag and the California StateFlags are flown, they shall be of the same size.
2. Flags should be hoisted briskly and lowered ceremoniously. The United States Flag should be hoisted first and lowered last.
3. Flags shall be displayed during operating hours on all dayson which the City is open for business, and on national and state holidays. Flags may be displayed twenty-four (24) hours a day aslong asthey are illuminated during darkness.
454
EXHIBIT A
4. Flags shall not be displayed during inclement weather. However, all- weather flags may be displayed twenty- four ( 24) hours a day as long as they are illuminated during darkness.
5. When flags are displayed on a single pole, the order from top to bottom shall be: the United StatesFlag, the California StateFlag, and if displayed, the City of Dublin Flag.
6. When the flags are flown from adjacentflag poles, the United StatesFlag shall be flown at the highest point of honor, which is the furthest point to the left from the standpoint of the observer (“the flag’s right”). The California State Flag shall be placed in the second position of honor. The City of Dublin Flag, if displayed, shall be placed in the third position of honor.
7. The United StatesFlag, the Stateof California Flag and the City of Dublin Flag shall be flown at the Dublin Civic Center.
B. Commemorative Flags
1. The City’ s flagpoles are not intended to serve as a forum for free expressionby the public. The City shall display commemorative flags only if authorized by the City Council as an expression of the City’ s official sentiments. Any such authorization shall be given at a duly noticed meeting of the City Council.
a) The City Council shall only consider a requestto display a commemorative flag if the request is made by a member of the Dublin City Council.
2. Commemorative flags shall be displayed for a period of time that is reasonableor customary for the subject that is to be commemorated, but no longer than thirty- one ( 31) continuous days.
3. Commemorative flags shall be displayed exclusively at the Dublin Civic Center. Such flags may be displayed on the Civic Center flag poles or on one or more buildings at the Civic Center.
4. Commemorative flags displayed on the Dublin Civic Center flagpoles shall be displayed in the last position of honor beneaththe City of Dublin Flag, unless otherwise directed by the City Council and to the extent such display doesnot conflict with federal law, statelaw, or this policy. 3229102.3
455
4 USC 7: Position and manner of display
Text contains those laws in effect on November 6, 2025
From Title 4-FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES CHAPTER 1-THE FLAG
Jump To:
Source Credit
Miscellaneous
Amendments
Effective Date
Executive Documents
§7. Position and manner of display
The flag, when carried in a procession with another flag or flags, should be either on the marching right; that is, the flag's own right, or, if there is a line of other flags, in front of the center of that line. (a) The flag should not be displayed on a float in a parade except from a staff, or as provided in subsection (i) of this section.
(b) The flag should not be draped over the hood, top, sides, or back of a vehicle or of a railroad train or a boat. When the flag is displayed on a motorcar, the staff shall be fixed firmly to the chassis or clamped to the right fender. (c) No other flag or pennant should be placed above or, if on the same level, to the right of the flag of the United States of America, except during church services conducted by naval chaplains at sea, when the church pennant may be flown above the flag during church services for the personnel of the Navy. No person shall display the flag of the United Nations or any other national or international flag equal, above, or in a position of superior prominence or honor to, or in place of, the flag of the United States at any place within the United States or any Territory or possession thereof: Provided, That nothing in this section shall make unlawful the continuance of the practice heretofore followed of displaying the flag of the United Nations in a position of superior prominence or honor, and other national flags in positions of equal prominence or honor, with that of the flag of the United States at the headquarters of the United Nations.
(d) The flag of the United States of America, when it is displayed with another flag against a wall from crossed staffs, should be on the right, the flag's own right, and its staff should be in front of the staff of the other flag. (e) The flag of the United States of America should be at the center and at the highest point of the group when a number of flags of States or localities or pennants of societies are grouped and displayed from staffs. (f) When flags of States, cities, or localities, or pennants of societies are flown on the same halyard with the flag of the United States, the latter should always be at the peak. When the flags are flown from adjacent staffs, the flag of the United States should be hoisted first and lowered last. No such flag or pennant may be placed above the flag of the United States or to the United States flag's right.
(g) When flags of two or more nations are displayed, they are to be flown from separate staffs of the same height.
The flags should be of approximately equal size. International usage forbids the display of the flag of one nation above that of another nation in time of peace.
(h) When the flag of the United States is displayed from a staff projecting horizontally or at an angle from the window sill, balcony, or front of a building, the union of the flag should be placed at the peak of the staff unless the flag is at half-staff. When the flag is suspended over a sidewalk from a rope extending from a house to a pole at the edge of the sidewalk, the flag should be hoisted out, union first, from the building. (i) When displayed either horizontally or vertically against a wall, the union should be uppermost and to the flag's own right, that is, to the observer's left. When displayed in a window, the flag should be displayed in the same way, with the union or blue field to the left of the observer in the street. (j) When the flag is displayed over the middle of the street, it should be suspended vertically with the union to the north in an east and west street or to the east in a north and south street. (k) When used on a speaker's platform, the flag, if displayed flat, should be displayed above and behind the speaker.
When displayed from a staff in a church or public auditorium, the flag of the United States of America should hold the position of superior prominence, in advance of the audience, and in the position of honor at the clergyman's or speaker's right as he faces the audience. Any other flag so displayed should be placed on the left of the clergyman or speaker or to the right of the audience.
(l) The flag should form a distinctive feature of the ceremony of unveiling a statue or monument, but it should never be used as the covering for the statue or monument.
(m) The flag, when flown at half-staff, should be first hoisted to the peak for an instant and then lowered to the half- staff position. The flag should be again raised to the peak before it is lowered for the day. On Memorial Day the flag should be displayed at half-staff until noon only, then raised to the top of the staff. By order of the President, the flag shall be flown at half-staff upon the death of principal figures of the United States Government and the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, as a mark of respect to their memory. In the event of the death of other officials or foreign dignitaries, the flag is to be displayed at half-staff according to Presidential instructions or orders, or in 11/7/25, 11:57 AM about:blank
about:blank 1/4
Attachment 2
456
accordance with recognized customs or practices not inconsistent with law. In the event of the death of a present or former official of the government of any State, territory, or possession of the United States, the death of a member of the Armed Forces from any State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on active duty, or the death of a first responder working in any State, territory, or possession who dies while serving in the line of duty, the Governor of that State, territory, or possession may proclaim that the National flag shall be flown at half-staff, and the same authority is provided to the Mayor of the District of Columbia with respect to present or former officials of the District of Columbia, members of the Armed Forces from the District of Columbia, and first responders working in the District of Columbia.
When the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, or the Mayor of the District of Columbia, issues a proclamation under the preceding sentence that the National flag be flown at half-staff in that State, territory, or possession or in the District of Columbia because of the death of a member of the Armed Forces, the National flag flown at any Federal installation or facility in the area covered by that proclamation shall be flown at half-staff consistent with that proclamation. The flag shall be flown at half-staff 30 days from the death of the President or a former President; 10 days from the day of death of the Vice President, the Chief Justice or a retired Chief Justice of the United States, or the Speaker of the House of Representatives; from the day of death until interment of an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, a Secretary of an executive or military department, a former Vice President, or the Governor of a State, territory, or possession; and on the day of death and the following day for a Member of Congress. The flag shall be flown at half- staff on Peace Officers Memorial Day, unless that day is also Armed Forces Day. As used in this subsection- (1) the term "half-staff" means the position of the flag when it is one-half the distance between the top and bottom of the staff;
(2) the term "executive or military department" means any agency listed under sections 101 and 102 of title 5; (3) the term "Member of Congress" means a Senator, a Representative, a Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico; and
(4) the term "first responder" means a "public safety officer" as defined in section 1204 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10284). (n) When the flag is used to cover a casket, it should be so placed that the union is at the head and over the left shoulder. The flag should not be lowered into the grave or allowed to touch the ground. (o) When the flag is suspended across a corridor or lobby in a building with only one main entrance, it should be suspended vertically with the union of the flag to the observer's left upon entering. If the building has more than one main entrance, the flag should be suspended vertically near the center of the corridor or lobby with the union to the north, when entrances are to the east and west or to the east when entrances are to the north and south. If there are entrances in more than two directions, the union should be to the east. (Added Pub. L. 105–225, §2(a), Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1495 ; amended Pub. L. 110–41, §3, June 29, 2007, 121 Stat. 233 ; Pub. L. 115–123, div. A, §10102(a), (b), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 64 .) Historical and Revision Notes
Revised
Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large)
7 36:175. June 22, 1942, ch. 435, §3, 56 Stat. 378 ;
Dec. 22, 1942, ch. 806, §3, 56 Stat. 1075 ;
July 9, 1953, ch. 183, 67 Stat. 142 ; July 7,
1976, Pub. L. 94–344, (6)–(11), 90 Stat.
811 ; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXII, §320922(b), 108 Stat. 2131 .
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2018-Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 115–123, §10102(a), in sixth sentence of introductory provisions, substituted "possession of the United States," for "possession of the United States or" and "former officials of the District of Columbia," for "former officials of the District of Columbia and" and inserted "or the death of a first responder working in any State, territory, or possession who dies while serving in the line of duty," after "while serving on active duty," and ", and first responders working in the District of Columbia" before the period.
Subsec. (m)(2). Pub. L. 115–123, §10102(b)(1), substituted a semicolon for ", United States Code; and".
Subsec. (m)(4). Pub. L. 115–123, §10102(b)(2), (3), added par. (4). 2007-Subsec. (m). Pub. L. 110–41, in sixth sentence, inserted "or the death of a member of the Armed Forces from any State, territory, or possession who dies while serving on active duty" after "present or former official of the government of any State, territory, or possession of the United States" and substituted ", and the same authority is provided to the Mayor of the District of Columbia with respect to present or former officials of the District of Columbia and members of the Armed Forces from the District 11/7/25, 11:57 AM about:blank
about:blank 2/4457
of Columbia. When the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, or the Mayor of the District of Columbia, issues a proclamation under the preceding sentence that the National flag be flown at half-staff in that State, territory, or possession or in the District of Columbia because of the death of a member of the Armed Forces, the National flag flown at any Federal installation or facility in the area covered by that proclamation shall be flown at half-staff consistent with that proclamation." for period at end.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2018 Amendment
Pub. L. 115–123, div. A, §10102(c), Feb. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 64 , provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Feb. 9, 2018]." Finding
Pub. L. 110–41, §2, June 29, 2007, 121 Stat. 233 , provided that: "Congress finds that members of the Armed Forces of the United States defend the freedom and security of the United States." Executive Documents
Proc. No. 3044. Display of Flag at Half-Staff Upon Death of Certain Officials and Former Officials
Proc. No. 3044, Mar. 1, 1954, 19 F.R. 1235, as amended by Proc. No. 3948, Dec. 12, 1969, 34 F.R. 19699, provided:
WHEREAS it is appropriate that the flag of the United States of America be flown at half-staff on Federal buildings, grounds, and facilities upon the death of principal officials and former officials of the Government of the United States and the Governors of the States, Territories, and possessions of the United States as a mark of respect to their memory; and WHEREAS it is desirable that rules be prescribed for the uniform observance of this mark of respect by all executive departments and agencies of the Government, and as a guide to the people of the Nation generally on such occasions:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER, President of the United States of America and Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, do hereby prescribe and proclaim the following rules with respect to the display of the flag of the United States of America at half-staff upon the death of the officials hereinafter designated:
1. The flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff on all buildings, grounds, and naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions for the period indicated upon the death of any of the following-designated officials or former officials of the United States:
(a) The President or a former President: for thirty days from the day of death.
The flag shall also be flown at half-staff for such period at all United States embassies, legations, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. (b) The Vice President, the Chief Justice or a retired Chief Justice of the United States, or the Speaker of the House of Representatives: for ten days from the day of death. (c) An Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, a member of the Cabinet, a former Vice President, the President pro tempore of the Senate, the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Majority Leader of the House of Representatives, or the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives: from the day of death until interment.
2. The flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff on all buildings, grounds, and naval vessels of the Federal Government in the metropolitan area of the District of Columbia on the day of death and on the following day upon the death of a United States Senator, Representative, Territorial Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and it shall also be flown at half-staff on all buildings, grounds, and naval vessels of the Federal Government in the State, Congressional District, Territory, or Commonwealth of such Senator, Representative, Delegate, or Commissioner, respectively, from the day of death until interment.
3. The flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff on all buildings and grounds of the Federal Government in a State, Territory, or possession of the United States upon the death of the Governor of such State, Territory, or possession from the day of death until interment. 11/7/25, 11:57 AM about:blank
about:blank 3/4458
4. In the event of the death of other officials, former officials, or foreign dignitaries, the flag of the United States shall be displayed at half-staff in accordance with such orders or instructions as may be issued by or at the direction of the President, or in accordance with recognized customs or practices not inconsistent with law.
5. The heads of the several departments and agencies of the Government may direct that the flag of the United States be flown at half-staff on buildings, grounds, or naval vessels under their jurisdiction on occasions other than those specified herein which they consider proper, and that suitable military honors be rendered as appropriate.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States of America to be affixed.
DONE at the City of Washington this 1st day of March in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and fifty- four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and seventy- eighth.
[seal]
Dwight D. Eisenhower.
11/7/25, 11:57 AM about:blank
about:blank 4/4459
Outdoor Flag Display
Policy
December 16, 2025
460
Background
• June 4, 2019 – City Council adopted Resolution No. 56-19, establishing the Outdoor Flag Display Policy.
• Policy governs how flags are displayed, including the:
• United States Flag
• California State Flag
• City of Dublin Flag
• Commemorative Flags (occasional display)
461
Background, 2
• The City displays outdoor flags at the
following locations:
• Civic Center
• Corporation Yard
• Don Biddle Community Park
• Dublin Sports Grounds
• Fallon Sports Park
• Fire Stations 16, 17, 18
• Heritage Park and Museums (on occasion)
• Public Safety Complex
• Senior Center
• Shannon Community Center
• The Wave Waterpark and Aquatic Center
462
Policy Overview
• The Outdoor Flag Display Policy outlines key provisions:
• Display Standards
• Displayed according to federal and state statutes.
• US Flag always flown in highest honor.
• Flown 24 hours a day if illuminated correctly.
• Commemorative Flags
• Must be authorized by City Council at a noticed meeting. • Flown for a reasonable period, not to exceed 31 days. • Requests to display must be made by City Council member. 463
Operating Practices for Lowering Flags
• The City follows the US Flag Code (Title 4, US
Code, Chapter 1), which provides guidelines for:
• Displaying properly at half-staff.
• Caring for the American flag.
• When the flag should be flown at half-staff.
• Presidential or Gubernatorial proclamation or
announcement.
• Tri-Valley cities follow very similar process as
Dublin.
464
Operating Practices for Lowering Flags, 2
• Established annual federal days of recognition:
• May 4 – National Firefighters Memorial Day
• May 15 – Peace Officers Memorial Day
• Last Monday in May – Memorial Day
• July 27 – Korean War Veterans Armistice Day
• September 11 – Patriot Day
• December 7 – Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day
465
Operating Practices for Lowering Flags, 3
• Honoring the death of national or state leaders as outlined in the US Flag Code.
• President or former President – 30 days
• Vice President, Chief Justice, Speaker of the House – 10 days • Former Vice President, Associate Justice of Supreme Court, Cabinet member, US Senator, Representative, Territorial Delegate, Governor – Until internment
• Presidential proclamation or gubernatorial order for tragic events or death of public servants or military personnel
466
Operating Practices for Lowering Flags, 4
• City Practice:
1. Receive notification from flag status alert
service.
2. Notify Public Works maintenance staff and
City Manager of the order.
3. News Flash published about flags being at
half-staff.
4. Maintenance staff promptly lower flags at
all facilities in accordance with order.
5. Flags remain at half-staff for duration of
specified order.
6. Maintenance staff return to full staff in
compliance with order.
467
Recommendation
• Receive the presentation.
• Questions?
468
STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Item 8.2
DATE: December 16, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Colleen Tribby, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Dublin Centre Neighborhood Park – Conceptual Design
Prepared by: Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider the conceptual design for the 2.01-acre Dublin Centre neighborhood park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the presentation and approve the conceptual design for the Dublin Centre neighborhood park.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Developer will bear all costs associated with the agreement, with the park being developed in accordance with the City’s requirement for land dedication and park improvement. The Developer will be granted fee credits in the Neighborhood Park Improvement Fee category under the Public Facilities Fee Program.
DESCRIPTION:
The Dublin Centre housing and retail development (formerly called SCS Dublin) is located north of Dublin Boulevard between Tassajara Road and Brannigan Street and extends to the north of Gleason Drive. The Developer is working with the City to facilitate the design and construction of a new 2.01-acre public park within the development, shown in Figure 1, in accordance with the Park Improvement Agreement approved by the City Council on June 17, 2025. A concept plan for the park is provided as Attachment 2.
469