East Palo Alto City Council
June 3, 2025

EAST PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
Tuesday, June 3, 2025, 6:30 PM
EPA Government Center
2415 University Avenue, First Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
NOTICE
This meeting will be held virtually and in-person at the Council Chambers located on 2415 University Ave, First Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303. The virtual portion of this City Council meeting will be conducted in accordance with City of East Palo Alto Resolution adopted pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.

The public may participate in the City Council Meeting via Zoom Meeting or by attending inperson in the Council Chambers at 2415 University Ave, First Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303.

Community members may provide comments by emailing [email protected], submitting a speaker card at the meeting, or using the RAISE HAND feature when the Mayor or City Clerk call for public comment. Emailed comments should include the specific agenda item on which you are commenting.

Please click this URL to join
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87008332677
Or join by phone:

Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):

US: +1 669 900 6833 or
+ 1 346 248 7799 or
+ 1 253 215 8782 or
+ 1 312 626 6799 or
+ 1 929 205 6099 or
+ 1 301 715 8592
Webinar ID: 870 0833 2677
International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aMWYF4KT East Palo Alto City Council June 3, 2025 Agenda
1 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL

2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA

3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR

3.1 Gun Violence Awareness Day Proclamation

3.2 Pride Month Proclamation

3.3 Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr. Proclamation

3.4 City Council Meeting Minutes

REQUESTS TO APPEAR REMOTELY
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953, members of the body may appear remotely for the following reasons:

1. Teleconference Exception (Gov’t Code § 54953(b)): None.

2. Just Cause (Gov’t Code § 54953(j)(2)(D)): (Contagious illness prevents the member from attending the meeting in person (Id., subd. (j)(2)(B))

3. Emergency Circumstances: None
Mayor Martha Barragan.

General description (Contagious illness prevents the member from attending the meeting in person (Id., subd. (j)(2)(B))
Affirmation (18 year or older participants)
Admonitions: (a) video and audio must remain on; (b) disruption causes cease of council action.

Recommendation:

Present the proclamation for Gun Violence Awareness Day.

Recommendation:

Present the proclamation for Pride Month.

Recommendation:

Present the proclamation for Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr .

Recommendation:

Adopt May 20, 2025, City Council Meeting Minutes.

East Palo Alto City Council June 3, 2025 Agenda
2 3.5 Authorization to Apply for CalHome 2025

3.6 Approval of Resolution concerning appeal hearing for 1174 Laurel Avenue

4. EPASD BOARD MEETING ITEMS - NONE

5. PUBLIC COMMENT

6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

7.1 San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority Presentation

8. PUBLIC HEARINGS

9. POLICY AND ACTION

9.1 Commission Appointments

9.2 FY2025–2029 Strategic Priorities Framework and FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution that authorizes the City Manager (or designee) to submit an application for the Homeownership Super Notice of Funding Availability (“HOSN”) to the Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”), issued on December 12, 2024, to issue deferredpayment loans of up to $250,000 to qualifying homeowners to support repair, rehabilitation, and new construction of second units in East Palo Alto, and, if awarded, to negotiate, execute, and deliver a State of California Standard Agreement, and any and all other documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to receive the grant funds.

Recommendation: Adopt a resolution denying an appeal concerning 1174 Laurel Avenue of a decision by the interim building official requiring a new permit for new construction following complete demolition of a garage, and directing that remaining fees from the prior permit be applied to the new permit, where legally permissible.

Recommendation: Accept the presentation.

Recommendation: Interview applicants for the Planning Commission; and appoint applicants for Regular or Alternate Seats.

Recommendation:

1. Receive results from the second round of community engagement, including the Council project prioritization process and community survey data;

2. Adopt FY2025-2029 Strategic Priorities;

3. Provide direction on carryforward and new projects in FY2025-2027 Work Plan; and
East Palo Alto City Council June 3, 2025 Agenda
3 10. CLOSED SESSION

11. COUNCIL REPORTS

12. ADJOURNMENT

4. Direct staff to finalize the Work Plan for formal adoption at the June 17, 2025, City Council meeting.

10.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 1180 Beech Street, East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Agency negotiator: Michelle Magarell, Deputy City Attorney, East Palo Alto

10.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).) Case Name Unspecified.

Upcoming meetings:

Regular Meeting June 17, 2025 6:30 PM
Special Meeting July 8, 2025 6:30 PM
Regular Meeting July 15, 2025 6:30 PM
This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a) This Notice of Availability of Public Records: All public records relating to an open session item which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act, that are distributed to the majority of the City Council will be available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, CA at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the City Council. Such documents may also be available on the East Palo Alto website www.cityofepa.org subject to staff’s ability to post the documents prior to the meeting. Information may be obtained by calling (650) 853-3100.

The City Council meeting packet may be reviewed by the public in the Library or the City Clerk's Office. Any writings or documents pertaining to an open session item provided to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, shall be made available for public inspection at the front counter at the City Clerk's Office, 2ND Floor, City Hall, 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto, California 94303 during normal business hours. Information distributed to the Council at the Council meeting becomes part of the public record. A copy of written material, pictures, etc. should be provided for this purpose.

East Palo Alto City Council Chambers is ADA compliant. Requests for disability related modifications or accommodations, aids or services may be made by a person with a disability to the City Clerk's office at (650) 853-3127 no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof.

DECLARATION OF POSTING
This Notice is posted in accordance with Government Code §54954.2(a) or §54956. Members of the public can view electronic agendas and staff reports by accessing the City website. Under penalty of perjury, this Agenda was posted to the public at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

POSTED: May 23, 2025
ATTEST:

James Colin
City Clerk
East Palo Alto City Council June 3, 2025 Agenda
4 CONSENT ITEM 3.1

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: James Colin, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Gun Violence Awareness Day Proclamation
Recommendation
Present the proclamation for Gun Violence Awareness Day.

Attachments

1. Proclamation
5 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO DECLARING JUNE 28, 2025, AS GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS DAY
WHEREAS, gun violence is a public health crisis that impacts communities across the United States, causing untold pain and suffering to individuals, families, and communities; and WHEREAS, every day, 120 people in America are killed with guns, and the gun homicide rate in the U.S. is 26 times higher than that of other developed countries; and WHEREAS, East Palo Alto has been affected by gun violence, which has brought immense tragedy and loss to our community, and it is our collective responsibility to address and combat this epidemic; and WHEREAS, as of 2023, California ranked #44 out of the 50 states, with one of the lowest firearm mortality rates, and received an "A" for having "the strongest gun safety laws in the United States"; and WHEREAS, while we have made progress as a state over the past decade, there is still work to be done to provide a safer environment for the developing generation(s); and WHEREAS, Gun Violence Awareness Day provides an opportunity to honor and remember all victims and survivors of gun violence, and to highlight the daily impact of gun violence on our neighborhoods, particularly in communities of color that are disproportionately affected; and WHEREAS, the observance of Gun Violence Awareness Day will encourage citizens to learn more about the impact of gun violence, support efforts to prevent further gun-related tragedies, and advocate for commonsense solutions that will help save lives; and WHEREAS, the wearing of orange on Gun Violence Awareness Day has become a symbol of the movement to end gun violence, as it reflects the value of human life and the desire for a future free from the fear and threat of gun violence; and
WHEREAS, by working together, we can increase awareness, support survivors, and honor the lives of those lost to gun violence, thereby fostering a safer environment for all residents of East Palo Alto; and WHEREAS, organizations, advocacy groups, and citizens across the country are committed to reducing gun violence through education, community engagement, and legislative advocacy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of East Palo Alto hereby declares June 28, 2024, as Gun Violence Awareness Day in the City of East Palo Alto; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council encourages all residents, businesses, and organizations to participate in activities and programs designed to raise awareness and seek solutions to end gun violence, including wearing orange to show solidarity with the movement.

Date: June 3, 2025

Martha Barragan, Mayor
6 CONSENT ITEM 3.2

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: James Colin, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Pride Month Proclamation
Recommendation
Present the proclamation for Pride Month.

Attachments

1. Proclamation
7 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO

CELEBRATING PRIDE MONTH
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of East Palo Alto recognizes and proclaims the month of June 2025 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQIA+) “Pride Month” throughout the City of East Palo Alto; and WHEREAS, East Palo Alto joins the County of San Mateo to observe Pride Month with a Progress Pride flag raising ceremony to honor the history of the LGBTQIA+ liberation movement and to support the rights of all citizens to experience equality and freedom from discrimination; and
WHEREAS, the Progress Pride flag is widely recognized as a symbol of pride, inclusion, and support for social movements that advocate for LGBTQIA+ people in society; and
WHEREAS, all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

LGBTQIA+ individuals have had immeasurable impact to the cultural, civic and economic successes of our country; and
WHEREAS, East Palo Alto is committed to supporting visibility, dignity and equality for LGBTQIA+ people in our diverse community; and WHEREAS, while society at large increasingly supports LGBTQIA+ equality, it is essential to acknowledge that the need for education and awareness remains vital to end discrimination and prejudice; and
WHEREAS, this nation was founded on the principle that every individual has infinite dignity and worth, and the City Council calls upon the people of this municipality to embrace this principle and work to eliminate prejudice everywhere it exists; and WHEREAS, celebrating Pride Month influences awareness and provides support and advocacy for San Mateo County’s LGBTQIA+ community, and is an opportunity to take action and engage in dialogue to strengthen alliances, build acceptance and advance equal rights.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of East Palo Alto herby proclaims the month of June 2025 as Pride Month in support of the LGBTQ community.

June 3, 2025
Martha Barragan
Mayor
8 CONSENT ITEM 3.3

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: James Colin, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr. Proclamation Recommendation
Present the proclamation for Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr.

Attachments

1. Proclamation
9 PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
CELEBRATING ELDER FREDERICK DUBLUNCH’ PORCHE’
SR.’S 50 YEARS OF PREACHING IN THE MINISTRY
WHEREAS, on December 10, 1975, at the age of 15, Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr., excepted his calling into the ministry up under the late Dr. G.L. Bedford Sr., of the Macedonia Missionary Baptist Church of San Francisco, CA. After having studied under Dr. Bedford Sr., for a few months he was allowed to move forward and preach his first message on February 22, 1976. His subject, “Can You Identify Yourself” Text, Jeremiah 1:15 and on that same day he was Licensed to exercise his gift. But a year later of June 12, 1977, he was fully Ordinated into the ministry; and
WHEREAS, he continued preaching throughout the City of San Francisco, preaching in local churches, preaching revivals, teaching in seminars, performing wedding, officiating funerals and on occasions asked to preach in front of the “Baptist Ministry Council of San Francisco”. Elder Porche’ Sr, also sat on the City Planning Board under the late Senator Dianne Feinstein who was serving as the Mayor during that time; and WHEREAS, he continued his education by attending “Bishop College” of Dallas, Tx and “Simpson Bible College” of San Francisco. After returning home from Dallas, TX., he was called to pastor the Bayview Tabernacle Baptist Church of San Francisco where he served for seven years before resigning; and WHEREAS, after many years of serving in the Baptist Church Organization he joined the Church of The Living God-CWFF, Temple #21 in April of 1995 under the leadership of Elder Willie Mingo, he proven himself worthy to pastor within the CWFF Organization he was later appointed as a new pastor to start up the Sacramento, CA Temple. After only a year and half that the Temple Closed, as the Lord seen fit, he was called back to Temple #21 where he was appointed as pastor under the late Bishop Jeff Ruffin; and WHEREAS, after two years pastoring Temple #21 in San Francisco, with the approval of the congregation and the Bishop the church moved to Pittsburgh, CA, where the church remain today. But in September 2006 once again he was given a new assignment by the bishop to pastor Temple #226 in the City Of East Palo Alto, CA where he led a band of a faithful few. He has been able to accomplish much during his nineteen years of pastoring in the East Palo Alto community. Much has been achieved under his leadership at Temple #21. He served as a teacher and as an Advisor for the District #11 “Men Brotherhood” and served as an instructor for “Ministerial Protocol and Ethic.” In the National Brotherhood of the Church of The Living God-CWFF everywhere he serves as both teacher and advisor within the men national brotherhood.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of East Palo Alto, on behalf of the entire community, does hereby recognize and honor Pastor Elder Frederick DuBlunch’ Porche’ Sr. for his unwavering faith, extraordinary dedication, and spiritual leadership over the course of nearly five decades.

Dated: May 25, 2025
Martha Barragan, Mayor
10 CONSENT ITEM 3.4

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: James Colin, City Clerk
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Minutes
Recommendation
Adopt May 20, 2025, City Council Meeting Minutes.

Attachments

1. May 20, 2025, City Council Meeting Minutes.
11 EAST PALO ALTO CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR SESSION AGENDA
Tuesday, May 20, 2025, 6:30 PM
EPA Government Center
2415 University Avenue, First Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Barragan at 6:33 PM.

Attendee Name Title Status Left
Martha Barragan Mayor Present 10:30 PM
Mark Dinan Vice Mayor Present
Carlos Romero Councilmember Present
Ruben Abrica Councilmember Present
Webster Lincoln Councilmember Present

2. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Mayor Barragan requested that item 17.1 be moved to be discussed after item 15.

A motion to approve the agenda with the proposed changes was made by Mayor Barragan, seconded by Vice Mayor Dinan, and passed unanimously.

3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Barragan pulled items 3.2 and 3.7 for discussion.

A motion to approve the consent calendar was made by Mayor Barragan, seconded by Vice Mayor Dinan, and passed unanimously.

3.1 Asian American & Pacific Islander Month Proclamation The following speakers provided public comments:
- Adit Naor
A motion to approve the item 3.1 was made by Councilmember Abrica, seconded by Councilmember Romero, and passed unanimously.

3.2 Jewish Heritage Month Proclamation

3.3 FY 2024-25 Third Quarter Treasury Report

3.4 Potential Project List Adoption for Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017

3.5 Proclamation of the City of East Palo Alto in Recognition of National Public Works Week
12 3.6 James Turner Proclamation

3.7 Alfredo Bryant Proclamation

3.8 City Council Meeting Minutes

4. CLOSED SESSION

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
The following speakers provided public comments:
- Marjory Ruiz Hidalgo
- Gail Dixon

6. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

7.1 One Shoreline Presentation
Len Materman, CEO of One Shoreline provided a presentation.

8. ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TO THE EAST PALO

ALTO SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD MEETING

9. APROVAL OF THE EPASD BOARD MEETING AGENDA

10. APPROVAL OF EPASD BOARD MEETING CONSENT CALENDAR
A Motion to approve the consent calendar was made by Mayor Barragan, seconded by Councilmember Lincoln and passed unanimously with Councilmember Romero being absent.

10.1 Cash Disbursement Report for March 2025

11. EPASD BOARD MEETING CLOSED SESSION

12. EPASD BOARD MEETING PUBLIC COMMENT

13. EPASD BOARD MEETING POLICY AND ACTION

14. EPASD BOARD REPORTS

15. ADJOURN EAST PALO ALTO SANITARY DISTRICT BOARD MEETING

AND RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

16. PUBLIC HEARINGS

16.1 Appeal hearing for 1174 Laurel Avenue
Amy Chen, Community Development Director and Donald Zhao Interim Chief Building Official provided a presentation for this item.

The following speakers provided public comments:
- Iliana Nicholas
- Mariana Sumina
13 - Elena Sava
A motion to approve item 16.1 was made by Councilmember Lincoln, seconded by Councilmember Abrica, and passed via the following votes Ayes: Abrica, Barragan, Lincoln. Romero
Noes: Dinan

16.2 Status of the City’s Vacancies, Recruitment, and Retention efforts Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2561
Ana Torres, Human Resources Manager, provided a presentation on item

16.2. The following speakers provided public comments:
- Kevin Lewis
- Janet Nunez
- Gail Dixon
A motion to approve item 16.2 was made by Councilmember Romero, seconded by Councilmember Abrica and passed unanimously with Mayor Barragan being absent.

17. POLICY AND ACTION

17.1 Commission Appointments
The Council interviewed the following applicants:
- Christopher Kao
- Elena Savva
- Elena Kogan
- DeVan Taylor
- Maria Rocha
- Elizabeth Pulido
- Gail Dixon
However, the Council did not make any appointments at that time due to an error in communication, which resulted in some applicants not receiving timely notice to attend the meeting. In order to ensure fairness and uphold the integrity of the selection process, the Council decided to interview the rest of the applicants at the June 3, 2025, meeting so that all eligible applicants would have an equal opportunity to participate.

17.2 2025 Transient Occupancy Tax Grant Recommendations Maurice Baker, Community Services Manager, provided a presentation on this item.

A motion to approve item 17.2 was made by Councilmember Romero, seconded by Councilmember Abrica and passed unanimously with Mayor Barragan being absent. 14

18. COUNCIL REPORTS

19. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 11:14 PM
15 CONSENT ITEM 3.5

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: Yajaira Morales, Housing Project Manager
Karen Camacho, Housing and Economic Development Manager Amy Chen, Community and Economic Development Director
SUBJECT: 2025 Application for CalHome ADU/JADU Grant Program Recommendation
Adopt a resolution:

1. Retroactively approving the City Manager’s (or designee) submission of an application for the Homeownership Super Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to provide deferred-payment loans of up to $250,000 to qualifying homeowners to support repair, rehabilitation, and new construction of second units in East Palo Alto,

2. Authorizing the City Manager (or designee) to negotiate and execute any documents or agreements, including a grant agreement, to accept and disburse such grant funding to qualified subrecipient; and

3. Finding that the proposed action does not constitute a “project” with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(4) and (5) in that it is a governmental fiscal, organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

Alignment with City Council Strategic Plan
This recommendation is primarily aligned with:

Priority: Promote Housing, Economic and Workforce Development 16 CONSENT ITEM 3.5
Background
On December 12, 2024, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) issued a 2024 Homeownership Super Notice of Funding Availability (2024 Super NOFA), due on March 13, 2025. This 2024 Super NOFA was a call for grant applications covering several categories for affordable homeownership projects and programs. City staff partnered with East Palo Alto Community Alliance and Neighborhood Development Organization (EPACANDO) to submit an application before the deadline. Historically, the City Council supported accessory dwelling unit (ADU) streamlining efforts and has supported the City submitting an application to the same program before today. This application would Supplement the City’s current CalHome ADU/ junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) Loan Program. City staff now seeks City Council authority for the application submittal, as required by HCD.

Analysis
CalHome
The CalHome Program, administered by HCD under the Super NOFA, provides funding to support a variety of activities aimed at assisting low-income homeowners. Through the issuance of deferred-payment loans, CalHome supports the acquisition, rehabilitation, repair, and construction of affordable housing.

Eligible applicants, including jurisdictions and qualified nonprofit organizations, may apply for CalHome funds in several project areas. These include Homeownership Development Project Loans, First-Time Homebuyer Mortgage Assistance, Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation (OOR) Assistance, Technical Assistance for Self-Help Housing Projects, Technical Assistance for Shared Housing Programs, ADU and JADU Programs, and the Acquisition of Manufactured Housing.

Applicants may request funding for up to two program areas. For most program combinations, with the exception of Homeownership Development Project Loans with or without Technical Assistance for Self-Help Housing Projects, the maximum award is $5 million. The maximum loan amount for an individual project varies by activity and is up to $250,000 for the new construction of an ADU or JADU.

CalHome JADU/ADU Loan Program
The CalHome JADU/ADU Loan Program implemented City Council’s Affordable Housing Strategy goal in January 2020 of establishing a dedicated funding source to assist low-income households in building ADUs, in response to the Second Unit and Anti-Displacement Task Force’s November 2019 recommendations for a comprehensive Second Unit strategy.

The CalHome JADU/ADU Loan Program was established after the City was awarded in 2020 a $2,000,000 grant from HCD to provide up to 20 loans to income-qualified homeowners interested in building, reconstructing, repairing, or rehabilitating ADUs or JADUs. In exchange, participating 17 CONSENT ITEM 3.5
homeowners agreed to rent their units to East Palo Alto households earning at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The City, East Palo Alto Community Alliance and Neighborhood Development Organization (EPACANDO), HCD, and Meriwest Credit Union (Meriwest) have collaborated to implement the program since its official launch via a webinar on January 19, 2022. Now that the City has the program up and running and the program is set to expire by June 2025, City staff is recommending continuation of the program. One potential funding source to continue the program is the recent 2024 Super NOFA.

Fiscal Impact
There is no net fiscal impact with the activities discussed in this staff report, as the City is not allocating funding toward the program. If awarded, the City will receive pass-through funds of up to $250,000 per applicant up to $3 million total, and an additional 20% of the individual loan amount for administrative costs (totaling up to $600,000), to be split between the City and the subcontractor EPACANDO, for a total grant amount of $3,600,000.

Public Notice
The public was provided notice by making the agenda and report available on the City’s website and on a bulletin board located at City Hall: 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto.

Environmental
The proposed action does not constitute a “project” with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(4) and (5) in that it is a governmental fiscal, organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

Government Code § 84308
Applicability of Levine Act: No, as the proposed action does not involve an entitlement.

Analysis of Levine Act Compliance: Not applicable.

Attachments

1. Resolution
18 RESOLUTION NO. XX-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
RETROACTIVELY APPROVING THE CITY MANAGER’S APPLICATION FOR THE

HOMEOWNERSHIP SUPER NOTICE OF FUNDING AVAILABILITY (SUPER NOFA) TO THE

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (HCD) TO PROVIDE DEFERRED-PAYMENT LOANS OF UP TO $250,000 TO QUALIFYING HOMEOWNERS TO

SUPPORT REPAIR, REHABILITATION, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND UNITS IN EAST PALO ALTO; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER (OR DESIGNEE) TO NEGOTIATE AND

EXECUTE ANY DOCUMENTS OR AGREEMENTS, INCLUDING A GRANT AGREEMENT, TO ACCEPT AND DISBURSE SUCH GRANT FUNDING TO QUALIFIED SUBRECIPIENT; AND FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A “PROJECT” WITHIN THE MEANING OF CEQA PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND (5) WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) issued a Homeownership Super Notice of Funding Availability (Super NOFA) on December 12, 2024, for the CalHome Program established by Chapter 84, Statutes of 2000 (SB 1656 Alarcon), and codified in Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 50650) of Part 2 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code (Statute), and pursuant to the statute, HCD is authorized to approve funding allocations utilizing monies made available by the State Legislature to the CalHome program, subject to the terms and conditions of the Statute and the CalHome Program Regulations adopted by HCD in April 2004; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to submit an application to obtain from HCD an allocation of CalHome funds in the amount of $3,600,000; and
WHEREAS, the proposed action does not constitute a “project” with the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15378(b)(4) and (5) in that it is a governmental fiscal, organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO as follows:

1. Finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct, and are incorporated by this action: and

2. The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves the submission to the State of California of one or more application(s) in the aggregate amount, not to exceed, $3,600,000 for the following activities pursuant to the 2024 Homeownership Super Notice of Funding Availability (Super NOFA)
CalHome Accessory Dwelling Unit/
Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Assistance Program $ 3,600,000

3. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager (or designee), to execute and deliver all documentation, including applications and act on the City of East Palo Alto’s behalf in 19 all matters pertaining to all such applications;

4. If an application is approved, the City Manager (or authorized designee), is authorized to negotiate, execute and deliver the Standard Agreement and any and all subsequent amendments thereto and related documents with the State of California for the purposes of obtaining the CalHome fund grant;

5. If the application is approved, the City Manager (or authorized designee), is authorized to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the CalHome fund grant; and

6. The application in full is incorporated by this reference as part of the Standard Agreement. Any and all activities funded, information provided, and timelines represented in the application are enforceable through the Standard Agreement. The City of East Palo Alto acknowledges and agrees that it may be required to execute any and all other instruments necessary or required by HCD for participation in the HOSN Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Barragan, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

James Colin, City Clerk John D. Lê, City Attorney
20 CONSENT ITEM 3.6

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: Amy Chen, Community & Economic Development Director Donald Zhao, Interim Chief Building Official
SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution concerning appeal hearing for 1174 Laurel Avenue Recommendation
Adopt a resolution denying an appeal concerning 1174 Laurel Avenue of a decision by the interim building official requiring a new permit for new construction following complete demolition of a garage and directing that remaining fees from the prior permit be applied to the new permit, where legally permissible.

Alignment with City Council Strategic Plan
This recommendation is primarily aligned with:

Priority: Promote Housing, Economic and Workforce Development Priority: Promote Health & Public Safety
Background
The procedural history of this appeal is more fully set forth in the staff’s report to the Council for the May 20, 2025, appeal hearing.

The appeal hearing was conducted according to the procedures in the staff report.

Ultimately, the Council moved to deny the appeal and directed staff to return with a resolution finalizing their decision.

Analysis
21 CONSENT ITEM 3.6
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution laying out the facts and law set forth in the May 20, 2025, staff report that includes the following, in addition to any facts or testimony offered at the hearing:
 EPAMC Chapter 15.08.010 adopts the 2022 California Building Standards Code, which requires construction to follow approved permits. The unauthorized demolition violates this requirement.
 “Substantial Improvement”, as defined in the California Existing Building Code (CEBC) Section 202 and EPAMC Section 15.52.040(VV) for Flood Plain Management, includes alterations in flood hazard areas where repair or improvement costs exceed 50% of the structure’s market value. Complete demolition exceeds this threshold, requiring full compliance with new construction standards, including:
 Elevating the floor 18 inches above base flood elevation. Needs to be certified by a registered engineer or surveyor and verified by the building official.  Meeting CALGreen mandatory requirements for residential construction (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
 Complying with the 2022 California Energy Code, including solar photovoltaic (PV) requirements under Section 150.1(c)(14). (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
 Potentially installing fire sprinklers, depending on site evaluation and water flow availability (not required for conversion). (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
 EPAMC Section 15.04.150 (Existing Buildings): requires new construction to meet updated building standards when the value of the alterations exceed 50% of the structure’s value. The demolition negates provisions for minor alterations, requiring full compliance with new construction codes.
 Although state law exempts ADUs under 750 square feet from impact fees, the proposed 400-square-foot ADU must still meet all applicable building code requirements for new construction.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact in the proposed action, outside of what was already disclosed in the May 20, 2025, agenda report.

Public Notice
The public was provided notice by making the agenda and report available on the City’s website 22 CONSENT ITEM 3.6
and on a bulletin board located at City Hall: 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto.

Environmental
The action being considered does not constitute a “Project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378 (b)(5), in that it is a government administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

Government Code § 84308
Applicability of Levine Act: No, as the proposed action does not involve an entitlement.

Analysis of Levine Act Compliance: Not applicable.

Attachments

1. Resolution.
23 RESOLUTION NO. [XX-2025]

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO

DENYING AN APPEAL OF A DECISION BY THE INTERIM BUILDING OFFICIAL

REQUIRING A NEW PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION FOLLOWING COMPLETE

DEMOLITION OF A GARAGE, AND DIRECTING THAT REMAINING FEES FROM

THE PRIOR PERMIT BE APPLIED TO THE NEW PERMIT, WHERE LEGALLY

PERMISSIBLE
WHEREAS, on January 24, 2024, the City of East Palo Alto issued a building permit to the property owner at 1174 Laurel Ave., East Palo Alto, CA 94303, #BLD2023- 1038, authorizing the conversion of a 400 square foot existing garage into an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), pursuant to the standards in Chapter 18.96 of the East Palo Alto Municipal Code and California Government Code § 65852.2; and WHEREAS, the approved permit scope allowed for [the removal and replacement of the existing garage roof and garage door, reinforcement of the foundation, and otherwise required the retention of the foundation and three structural walls/retaining and reinforcing three existing walls, replacing the garage door wall, and installing a new concrete slab] to meet the criteria for a conversion under state and local ADU law; and
WHEREAS, upon subsequent inspection, a Building inspector determined that the property owner had demolished the entire structure—including all existing walls, the roof, and the foundation—thereby eliminating any physical continuity with the original garage and converting the project into a new construction, which is materially different from a conversion; and
WHEREAS, demolition and new construction are not authorized under the original garage-to-ADU conversion permit, and under the California Building Code and the City’s adopted building regulations, such work requires a new building permit; and WHEREAS, on October 1, 2024, the Building official issued a notice to the property owner to cease all unauthorized work and to submit a new building permit application for new ADU construction, consistent with applicable codes and standards; and
24 WHEREAS, the property owner appealed the Interim Building Official’s decision to the City Council in accordance with the appeal procedures set forth in the East Palo Alto Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on May 20, 2025, at which time the property owner and members of the public were provided an opportunity to be heard, and all evidence was considered; and WHEREAS, based on the record and evidence presented, the City Council finds that the scope of work completed by the property owner is inconsistent with the approved permit and constitutes new construction, requiring a new building permit under the California Building Code and City building regulations.

NOW, THEREFORE, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF EAST PALO ALTO:

1. The appeal filed by the property owner of 1174 Laurel Ave., East Palo Alto, CA 94303, is hereby DENIED.

2. The City Council hereby adopts the May 20, 2025, Staff Report, attached hereto as Exhibit A, as part of the factual basis and record supporting any decision rendered in these proceedings.

3. The decision and interpretation of the Interim Building Official is UPHELD, and the property owner is required to apply for and obtain a new building permit for the construction of an accessory dwelling unit, in compliance with the California Building Code and Chapter 18.96 of the East Palo Alto Municipal Code.

4. The City Council finds that the complete demolition of the original 400 sq. ft. garage structure, including removal of all three walls, roof, and foundation—was outside the scope of the approved conversion permit, which required structural retention.

5. City staff are directed to apply any unused or remaining portion of the original permit fees paid under the prior garage conversion permit toward the application fee for the new construction permit, to the extent such application of funds is legally and administratively permissible under the City’s fee and accounting policies.

6. The City Council finds that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures).
25 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution and ensure that a copy is transmitted to the property owner and retained in the official project file.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of East Palo Alto at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Martha Barragan, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

James Colin, City Clerk John D. Lê, City Attorney
26 EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: May 20, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: Amy Chen, Community & Economic Development Director Donald Zhao, Interim Chief Building Official
SUBJECT: Appeal hearing for 1174 Laurel Avenue
Recommendation
Staff recommend the City Council deny the appeal application regarding 1174 Laurel Avenue.

The garage conversion to an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), under permit #BLD2023-0138, was not completed according to the approved scope.

Staff also recommend the City Council direct staff to recover any unused building permit fees from permit #BLD2023-0138 and apply them to the new building permit fee required for new ADU construction.

Alignment with City Council Strategic Plan
This recommendation is primarily aligned with:

Priority: Promote Housing, Economic and Workforce Development Priority: Promote Health & Public Safety
Background
Mr. Akhil Aggrawal owns the property at 1174 Laurel Avenue. The original project aimed to convert a 400-square-foot detached garage into a 400-square-foot ADU. The project timeline is as follows:
 December 2020: Mr. Aggrawal submitted the initial application for garage conversion. 39 EXHIBIT A
27  October 19, 2023: After hiring a new designer, Mr. Derek Ouyang, he submitted a Preliminary Ministerial Review (PMR) application to the Planning Division to confirm compliance with development standards. This does not constitute a planning permit nor authorize construction.
 November 15, 2023: The Planning Division approved the PMR.  November 21, 2023: Me. Aggrawal submitted the Building permit application.  January 24, 2024: The Building Division issued permit #BLD2023-0138 for the conversion. The approved scope required retaining and reinforcing three existing walls, replacing the garage door wall, and installing a new concrete slab.

However, on October 1, 2024, a Building Inspector found that the entire garage structure, including its foundation, had been demolished, violating both the East Palo Alto Municipal Code (EPAMC) and the California Building Code. The issued permit only allowed for conversion of the existing structure, not demolition and new construction. To erect a new ADU on the site, as opposed to conversion of an existing structure, a separate permitting process is required.

The inspector issued a Correction Notice the same day, informing Mr. Aggrawal and Mr. Ouyang that the work did not comply with the approved plans related to permit #BLD2023-0138, and that construction could not proceed.

On November 4, 2024, Mr. Ouyang contacted the City to contest the issue. During a meeting on January 7, 2025, Mr. Ouyang admitted that they had demolished the structure after discovering compromised wall integrity – but did not apply for the required demolition permit or inform the City. Director Amy Chen explained that, because the structure had been demolished, the project requires new approvals for ADU construction, as required by the East Palo Alto Municipal Code.

After discussions on the appeal process and fee, Mr. Aggrawal and Mr. Ouyang submitted a formal appeal on April 30, 2025. This hearing addresses that appeal.

Analysis
The complete demolition of the garage invalidated permit #BLD2023-0138. Because the structure no longer exists, the approved conversion permit and its related inspection sequence no longer apply.

The following codes and regulations govern the situation:
 EPAMC Chapter 15.08.010 adopts the 2022 California Building Standards Code, which requires construction to follow approved permits. The unauthorized demolition violates this requirement.
 “Substantial Improvement”, as defined in the California Existing Building Code (CEBC) Section 202 and EPAMC Section 15.52.040(VV) for Flood Plain Management, includes 2840
alterations in flood hazard areas where repair or improvement costs exceed 50% of the structure’s market value. Complete demolition exceeds this threshold, requiring full compliance with new construction standards, including:
 Elevating the floor 18 inches above base flood elevation. Needs to be certified by a registered engineer or surveyor and verified by the building official.  Meeting CALGreen mandatory requirements for residential construction (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
 Complying with the 2022 California Energy Code, including solar photovoltaic (PV) requirements under Section 150.1(c)(14). (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
 Potentially installing fire sprinklers, depending on site evaluation and water flow availability (not required for conversion). (The previously approved plans met this requirement)
EPAMC Section 15.04.150 (Existing Buildings): requires new construction to meet updated building standards when the value of the alterations exceed 50% of the structure’s value. The demolition negates provisions for minor alterations, requiring full compliance with new construction codes.

Although state law exempts ADUs under 750 square feet from impact fees, the proposed 400- square-foot ADU must still meet all applicable building code requirements for new construction.

Typically, if a builder finds a structural issue, they must notify the Building Division and submit revised plans before deviating from the original scope. In this case, Mr. Aggrawal and Mr.

Ouyang failed to notify the City or apply for changes. Instead, they proceeded to demolish the structure without approval.

Upholding this appeal would require staff to inspect a project that no longer matches the approved plans. This would compromise the City’s ability to enforce building codes and set a dangerous precedent – allowing applicants to obtain conversion permits with fewer requirements, demolish structures, and appeal to bypass stricter standards for new construction. Such a practice would undermine the integrity of the permitting process and endanger public safety.

To protect community safety and ensure code compliance, staff recommend denying the appeal and requiring the applicant to submit a new building permit application for new ADU construction.

Procedures (and time allotment) for the Conduction of the Appeal Hearing According to Cal. Gov. Code 65905 and EPAMC Title 18, Article 8, Chapter 18.116.040 (C)(2) this hearing shall be conducted in compliance with standard hearing procedures. This is the first 2941
Building Appeal and thus there are no examples of time limits from previous hearings.

Fundamental due process requires that all parties in a quasi-judicial hearing, such as this appeal, have a reasonable opportunity to present their case. Time limits must be reasonable and applied equally to all parties. Thus, the following procedures and suggested time limits are what the City Council may follow to ensure an orderly and fair hearing:
a. Call to Order and Opening (~5minutes)
 Mayor Barragan opens meeting
 Introduce the appeal case on the record
 Describe the subject property and issue
b. Staff Presentation (~10 minutes)
 City planning staff presents background, decision rationale, and applicable legal standards
c. Appellant Presentation (~10 minutes)
 Appellant presents reasons for appeal
 May include legal arguments, hardship, or evidence disputing staff findings d. Staff Rebuttal (if any) (~10 minutes)
 Staff responds to the appellants claims.
e. Public Comment (~10 minutes)
 Open floor to other stakeholders (neighbors, interest groups, etc.) 2-3 minutes each.
f. Appellant Rebuttals (~2-5 minutes)
 Appellant may provide brief rebuttal
g. City Council Questions/Discussion (~5 minutes)
 Council members ask questions to staff or appellant.
h. Deliberation and Decision (~5 minutes or as needed)
 Hearing body discusses in open session
 Votes on the appeal
 Must state findings on the record
3042
o E.g., how the decision conforms with Gov. Code § 65852.2  Decision must be based on substantial evidence in the record i. Close the Hearing
Fiscal Impact
This item does not have a fiscal impact. The applicant previously paid $3,689.99 for permit #BLD2023-0138. If the appeal is denied, the applicant must pay for a new building permit. The City Council may direct staff to apply any unused funds from the previous permit toward the new building permit fee.

Public Notice
The public was provided notice by making the agenda and report available on the City’s website and on a bulletin board located at City Hall: 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto.

Environmental
The action being considered does not constitute a “Project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378 (b)(5), in that it is a government administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

Government Code § 84308
Applicability of Levine Act: Yes.

Analysis of Levine Act Compliance: See below.

Parties: Akhil Aggrawal, Derek Ouyang
Participant(s): Vice Mayor Mark Dinan forwarded an email from Derek Ouyang on February 4, 2025. The City Attorney was informed and emailed the City Council informing them of the due process requirements and asked the Council to refrain from communicating with the appellant. No further email communication followed, but this is noted for the record.

Attachments

1. Stamped Approved Plans for Building permit #BLD2023-0138

2. Submitted Appeal
3143
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303

COVER SHEET
A0.0
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1 2 4

PROJECT INFO VICINITY MAP

SITE PLAN
ADDRESS: 1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA, 9430
APN: 062-125-160
OWNER: AKHIL AGGRAWAL
EXISTING PROPERTY LOT COVERAGE: 1,950 SQFT
LOT SIZE: 6,250 SQFT
SCOPE OF WORK: CONVERT EXISTING 400 SQFT DETACHED GARAGE INTO 400 SQFT DETACHED ADU. NO IMPACT TO INTERIOR OF EXISTING MAIN RESIDENCE.

ZONE: R-LD
OCCUPANCY: R-3 / U
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B
FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION:

ZONE: AE
FIRM MAP NUMBER: 06081C0307F
BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (BFE): 17 FT. ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, OR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS MUST BE FLOOD DAMAGE-RESISTANT MATERIALS BELOW THE LINE.

PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION (FFE) OF ADU: 17 FT
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST OF $120,000 < 50% EXISTING IMPROVEMENT VALUE, $244,236 PER SAN MATEO COUNTY 2022 TAX ASSESSOR ROLL, MEANING THE CONVERSION WILL

NOT TRIGGER FLOOD ZONE UPGRADES

PROPERTY CURRENTLY DOES NOT HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS, AND BECAUSE PROPOSED PROJECT

DOES NOT CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT, FIRE SPRINKLERS WILL NOT BE INSTALLED.

APPLICABLE CODE EDITIONS:

CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 2022 EDITION
CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE 2022 EDITION

EAST PALO ALTO MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.04.125 LIMITS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY TO THE FOLLOWING HOURS: MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY: 7:00 AM TO 6:00 PM; SATURDAY: 9:00 AM TO 5:00 PM; SUNDAYS AND NATIONAL HOLIDAYS: NO ACTIVITY ALLOWED

SHEET CONTENTS
A0.0 COVER SHEET
A0.1 FLOOD MAP
A1 FLOOR PLAN
A2.0 ELEVATION AND SECTION
A2.1 ELEVATIONS
A3 LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL
PLAN
A4 CONSTRUCTION BEST

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
G1 GREEN BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS
G2 GREEN BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS
T1 TITLE 24
T2 TITLE 24
T3 TITLE 24
T4 CF1R-ALT-02
T5 RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY

MEASURES SUMMARY
S0.0 GENERAL NOTES -

STRUCTURAL
S1.0 FOUNDATION PLAN
S1.1 ROOF AND CEILING

FRAMING PLAN
S2.0 DETAILS
S2.1 DETAILS
S2.2 DETAILS
3 DRAWING LIST
125’ - 0”
50’ - 0”
4’ - 0”
SITE PLAN NOTES:
- EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE STRUCTURE,

TO BE CONVERTED TO DETACHED ADU,

ABIDES BY STATE SIDE AND REAR YARD
SETBACK REQUIREMENT OF 4 FT
- (E) GAS METER AND (E) ELECTRICAL METER
ARE GREATER THAN 3 FT APART
- NO EXISTING EASEMENTS
SANITARY SYSTEM NOTES:
- PIPE WITH COVER LESS THAN 3 FT MUST BE
CLASS 200 PVC.
- PIPE WITH COVER OF 3 FT AND ABOVE CAN
BE CLASS 150 PVC OR HIGHER.
- SEWER PIPES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
SLOPE OF 2% AND A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 3%.
- INSTALL (N) 4” WYE CONNECTION INTO

EXISTING LATERAL SEWER TO SERVE NEW

ADU DRAINAGE FIXTURES

LAUREL AVE

STREET CURB

PROPERTY LINE
1/8” = 1’ - 0”
N
(E) MAIN RESIDENCE
(E) GARAGE
TO BE

CONVERTED

INTO ADU
30’ - 0”
4’ - 0”
4’ - 0”
62’ - 0” 9’ - 0”
20’ - 0”
20’ - 0”
26’ - 0”

MELLO ST

STREET CURB
(E) 4” SEWER LATERAL, 2% SLOPE (N) 4” SEWER LINE, 2% SLOPE AND CLASS 150 PVC (E) BUILDING

ADDRESS SIGN TO
REMAIN
(N) BUILDING

ADDRESS SIGN
(E) SSCO
RIM: 15.8
INV: 12.5
(N) SSCO
RIM: 15.8
INV: 12.5
(E) ELECTRICAL
METER

UPGRADE TO
(N) 200 AMP
PANEL
(E) GAS
METER
(N) TIE-IN
RIM: 15.5
INV: 12.2
(E) DRIVEWAY (N) 4FT HIGH
WOODEN
FENCE
(N) SSCO WITHIN 5’

OF SEWER LINE

EASEMENT PER
DISTRICT DETAIL #7
(E) WATER
METER/SERVICE EAVE 2’ - 0”
EAVE 2’ - 0”
3 3
3 3
3 3
2 Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
3244

FLOOD MAP
A0.1
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
1 FLOOD MAP
3 No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
3345

FLOOR PLAN
A1
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
1 FLOOR PLAN
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
2 NOTES

ROOM AREA
BATHROOM 56.6 SF
LIVING SPACE 312 SF
NET SF 368.6 SF
NATURAL VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS:

LIVING SPACE
4% X 312 SF = 12.5 SF VENTILATION REQ.
48 SF PROVIDED
NATURAL LIGHT REQUIREMENTS:

LIVING SPACE
8% X 312 SF = 25 SF NATURAL LIGHT REQ.
95 SF PROVIDED
N

KEYNOTES

1. DEMOLISH EXISTING GARAGE DOOR. INSTALL

NEW INFILL WALL WITH DOORS AND
WINDOWS.

2. PREFABRICATED KITCHEN AND BATHROOM
COMPONENTS TO BE ASSEMBLED ONSITE.

3. INSTALL ADDITIONAL 2X4 STUDS IN
PERIMETER WALLS TO ACHIEVE 12” O.C.

4. DEMO (E) CONCRETE SLAB. INSTALL (N)
10-MIL VAPOR RETARDER CONFORMING TO
ASTME1745 CLASS A REQUIREMENTS, PER
CRC R506.2.3. POUR (N) 4” REINFORCED SLAB.

INSTALL (N) UNDERLAYMENT AND VINYL
FLOORING.

5. CONNECT (N) INTERIOR WALL TO GARAGE

SIDE WALL USING HARDENED STEEL
STRUCTURAL NO.9 2-½” SCREWS OR
EQUIVALENT AT 24” O.C.

6. SHOWER DOOR SHALL OPEN SO AS TO
MAINTAIN A 22” MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED
OPENING FOR EGRESS PER CPC 408.5.

SHOWER STALL TO BE 1024 SQUARE INCHES

MINIMUM AND CAPABLE OF ENCOMPASSING A
30” DIAMETER CIRCLE, CPC 408.6. SHOWER

SHALL HAVE INDIVIDUAL CONTROL VALVES OF

THE PRESSURE BALANCE OR THERMOSTATIC
MIXING VALVE TYPE (CPC 408.3). MAX WATER

TEMPERATURE DISCHARGING FROM

INDIVIDUAL SHOWERHEAD SHALL BE LIMITED
TO 120 DEGREES F USING FIELD-ADJUSTED
SHOWER VALVE (CPC 408.3.2).

7. MINIMUM 36” DEEP CLEAR LANDING, MAX 7-¾”

TO TOP OF THE THRESHOLD FOR INSWING
DOOR AND MAX 1-½” TO TOP OF THE

THRESHOLD FOR OUT-SWINGING DOORS PER
CRC R311.3.1. SLODE OF EXTERIOR LANDING
SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% SLOPE PER CRC
311.1.

8. SINK FAUCETS < 1.2 GPM, > 0.8 GPM.

SHOWERHEAD < 1.8 GPM. TOILET < 1.28 GPF.

9. GYPSUM BOARD SHALL NOT BE USED WHERE

THERE WILL BE DIRECT EXPOSURE TO

WATER, OR IN AREAS SUBJECT TO
CONTINUOUS HIGH HUMIDITY. CRC R2702.3.7.

BATHTUB AND SHOWER FLOORS AND WALLS

ABOVE BATHTUBS WITH INSTALLED SHOWER

HEADS AND IN SHOWER COMPARTMENTS

SHALL BE FINISHED WITH A NONABSORBENT
SURFACE. SUCH WALL SURFACES SHALL
EXTEND TO A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN 6FT
ABOVE THE FLOOR. CRC R307.2.

10. TWO EXTERIOR WALLS AND ROOF EAVES
WITHIN 5FT OF PROPERTY LINE TO BE

ONE-HOUR FIRE RATED WALLS TESTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E119 OR UL 263
WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. UL
DESIGN U305.

11. WATER CLOSET TO HAVE A SIDE CLEARANCE
OF 15” ON EACH SIDE MEASURED FROM THE

CENTERLINE OF THE WATER CLOSET TO THE

WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS (CPC
402.5).
1 (N) STUDIO ROOM
(N) BATHROOM
2 4
4 5
6 7
8 9

WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE
MARK COUNT HEIGHT WIDTH AREA VENT. LIGHT DETAILS
A 3 4’-0” 4’-0” 48 SF 24 SF 45 SF NEW WINDOW, SAFETY GLAZING CRC R308.4 B 1 4’-0” 2’-0” 8 SF 4 SF 7 SF NEW BATHROOM WINDOW
C 1 6’-8” 3’-0” 20 SF 0 SF 0 SF NEW FRONT DOOR, SAFETY GLAZING CRC R308.4 D 1 6’-8” 6’-0” 40 SF 20 SF 10 SF NEW PATIO SLIDING DOOR, SAFETY GLAZING CRC R308.4
E 1 6’-6” 2’-10” 18 SF 0 SF 0 SF NEW BATHROOM DOOR
A
C D
E
A
B A

OUTDOOR SEMI-ENCLOSED AREA,
(N) 4FT HIGH WOODEN FENCE
10 10
11 3
3 3
3 3
2 No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
4634
ROOF:
- (N) SHINGLE ROOFING, CLASS C
MIN RATING (CRC R902)
- (N) GRACE ROOF UNDERLAYMENT
- (N) ¾” ROOF SHEATHING DECK
ATTIC:
- (N) SCISSOR TRUSSES
- (N) R-30 BATT INSULATION, 1-INCH

MIN SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF

ROOF SHEATHING AND INSULATION
(CRC R806.3)
CEILING:
- (N) ⅝” GYPSUM BOARD

ELEVATION AND

SECTION
A2.0
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
2 WEST ELEVATION
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
DEMOLISH (E) GARAGE DOOR; (N)
INFILL WALL WITH DOORS; (N)

WOOD SIDING
1 WEST SECTION
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
EXTERIOR WALL:
- (E) EXTERIOR WOOD SIDING TO
REMAIN
- (E) TYVEK HOUSE WRAP TO
REMAIN
- (E) 2X4 WALL FRAMING WITH
ADDITIONAL (N) 2X4 STUDS
- (N) R-15 BATT INSULATION
- (N) ⅝” GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR

UL TYPE X
A
C
D
FLOOR:
- (N) 10-MIL VAPOR RETARDER CONFORMING
TO ASTME1745 CLASS A REQUIREMENTS,
PER CRC R506.2.3.
- (N) CONCRETE SLAB
- (N) UNDERLAYMENT + VINYL FLOORING
ATTIC VENTILATION:
- 400 SF OF ATTIC AREA
- 400 / 150 = 2.7 SF (384 SQ.IN.) NET VENTILATION AREA REQUIRED (CRC R806.2)
- PROVIDE WALL VENT BENEATH RIDGE ON WEST AND EAST
ELEVATION (AS SHOWN), EACH 1.75 SF, TOTALING 3.5 SF

PREMISE ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION

SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH

NUMERALS NOT LESS THAN FOUR

INCHES IN HEIGHT WITH A MINIMUM
STROKE OF 0.5 INCHES ON THE

SIDE OF THE BUILDING THAT IS

VISIBLE FROM THE STREET OR
ROAD FRONTING THE PROPERTY.

THE NUMBERS SHALL BE IN ARABIC

NUMERALS OR ALPHABET LETTERS
(CFC 505.1)

ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL BE

ILLUMINATED TO BE VISIBLE FROM

THE STREET DURING DARKNESS
(CBC 501.2.1)
ATTIC SPACE ABOVE BATHROOM (7 FT CEILING HEIGHT)
ACCESSIBLE THROUGH 36” X 30” ACCESS DOOR,
LOCATED ON WALL ABOVE BATHROOM DOOR. ACCESS

MUST BE AT LEAST AS LARGE AS LARGEST COMPONENT
OF APPLIANCE (20” X 20”) OR 22” X 30” (CMC 304.4).

MAX HEIGHT: 13’-3” ABOVE GRADE
ROOF EAVE WITHIN 5FT OF PROPERTY LINE, 1 HOUR FIRE
RATED:
- (N) ⅝” GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR UL TYPE X
- (N) SOFFIT BOARD
EXTERIOR WALL WITHIN 5FT OF PROPERTY LINE, 1 HOUR
FIRE RATED BOTH SIDES, UL U305:
- (E) 2X4 WALL FRAMING WITH ADDITIONAL (N) 2X4 STUDS
- (N) R-15 BATT INSULATION
- (N) ⅝” GYPSUM BOARD INTERIOR UL TYPE X
- (N) ⅝” GYPSUM BOARD EXTERIOR UL TYPE X
- (N) TYVEK HOUSE WRAP
- (N) T1-11 PLYWOOD EXTERIOR SIDING

WALL VENT FOR ATTIC

VENTILATION
ROOF SLOPE: 6/12
BFE, DFE, FFE: 17FT
3 334
3 3
3 3
3 4
No. Description Date 1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3) Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
3547

ELEVATIONS
A2.1
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
2 EAST ELEVATION
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
3 SOUTH ELEVATION
1/4” = 1’ - 0”
A
A A
B

WALL VENT FOR ATTIC

VENTILATION
3 No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
4836

LIGHTING AND

ELECTRICAL PLAN
A3
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
1 FLOOR PLAN
1/4” = 1’ - 0”

LIGHTING

1. ALL LUMINAIRES SHALL BE HIGH-EFFICACY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBEES TABLE 150.0-A, AND SHALL COMPLY WITH CEC 150.0(K)

2. ALL LED LUMINAIRES AND LAMPS SHALL BE MARKED “JA8-2022” AND LISTED IN THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DATABASE AT HTTPS://CACERTAPPLIANCES.ENERGY.CA.GOV/PAGES/APPLIANCESSEARCH.ASPX

3. ALL RECESSED DOWNLIGHT AND ENCLOSED LUMINAIRES SHALL BE MARKED “JA8-2022-E” AND LISTED IN THE

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION DATABASE AT
HTTPS://CACERTAPPLIANCES.ENERGY.CA.GOV/PAGES/APPLIANCESSEARCH.ASPX

4. RECESSED DOWNLIGHT LUMINAIRES IN CEILINGS SHALL NOT BE SCREW-BASED

5. BATHROOMS, GARAGES, LAUNDRY ROOMS, AND UTILITY ROOMS: AT LEAST ONE LUMINAIRE IN EACH SPACE SHALL BE

CONTROLLED BY A VACANCY SENSOR

6. DIMMERS: EXCEPT AS NOTED FOR KITCHENS, BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY, UTILITY ROOMS, GARAGE, & EXTERIOR LIGHTING, ALL LIGHTING TO BE CONTROLLED BY DIMMERS. DIMMERS CAN BE ELIMINATED IF FLUORESCENT OR APPROVED HIGH EFFICACY DEVICE IS USED. ALL LUMINAIRES REQUIRING “JA8-2022” OR “JA8-2022-E” MARKING SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY A DIMMER OR VACANCY SENSOR. EXCEPTION: CLOSESTS LESS THAN 70 SF & HALLWAYS

7. PROVIDE A SWITCHED LIGHT OUTLET OR SWITCHED RECEPTACLE IN EVERY HABITABLE ROOM

8. ALL RECESSED LIGHT FIXTURES TO EMPLOY GASKET OR CAULKING TO SEPARATE CONDITIONED FROM

NON-CONDITIONED SPACE

9. SWITCHED RECEPTACLES ARE NOT PERMITTED IN KITCHEN OR BATHROOM

EXTERIOR LIGHTS

1. PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE AT ALL EXTERIOR DOORS. CEC 210.70(A)

2. OUTDOOR LIGHTING PERMANENTLY MOUNTED TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING SO AS TO NOT OPERATE DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS:
a. PHOTOCONTROL AND MOTION SENSOR
b. PHOTOCONTROL AND AUTOMATIC TIME-SWITCH CONTROL
c. ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK
d. ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM PER CBEES 150.0(K)3AIIIC

3. EXTERIOR LIGHTS ATTACHED TO STRUCTURE SHALL TURN OFF AUTOMATICALLY WITHIN 30 MINUTES IF NOT

REACTIVATED BY MOTION DETECTOR

4. (2) AND (3) ABOVE NOT REQUIRED IF FLUORESCENT OR OTHER APPROVED HIGH EFFICACY FIXTURE USED

CLOSET LIGHTING

1. PROVIDE MIN. 12” CLEARANCE BETWEEN FULLY ENCLOSED LED FIXTURE & NEAREST POINT OF STORAGE

2. PROVIDE MIN. 6” CLEARANCE BETWEEN FLUORESCENT FIXTURE & NEAREST POINT OF STORAGE

GENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTES

1. THESE NOTES CONVEY MIN. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND ARE TO BE USED WHERE APPLICABLE CONDITIONS OCCUR. MORE STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS STIPULATED ELSEWHERE WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS OR WITHIN RELEVANT MANUFACTURER’S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS WILL SUPERSEDE

2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED PER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THESE DOCUMENTS AND THE MANUFACTURER’S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS

OVERCURRENT PROTECTION

1. OVERCURRENT DEVICES SHALL BE READILY ACCESSIBLE

2. OVERCURRENT DEVICES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WHERE THEY WILL BE EXPOSED TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE

3. OVERCURRENT DEVICES SHALL NOT BE IN THE VICINITY OF EASILY IGNITABLE MATERIALS, SUCH AS IN A CLOTHES CLOSET

4. OVERCURRENT DEVICES IN DWELLING UNITS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN BATHROOM

5. BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY BEDROOM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN ARC-FAULT CIRCUIT

INTERRUPTER

6. ALL PANEL CIRCUITS TO BE LABELED

KITCHEN

1. PROVIDE MIN. (2) 20A, SMALL APPLIANCE BRANCH CIRCUITS. MAY INCLUDE APPLIANCE OUTLETS IN PANTRY, DINING ROOM, & OTHER SIMILAR AREAS. CEC 210.52(C)(3)

2. REFRIGERATOR MAY BE ON ITS OWN 15A OR GREATER CIRCUIT

3. NO POINT ALONG COUNTERTOP SHALL BE MORE THAN 24” FROM OUTLET. OUTLETS MUST BE NO MORE THAN 18” ABOVE COUNTERTOP. SPACES SEPARATED BY SINKS, RANGE TOPS, OR REFRIGERATORS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATE SPACE. OUTLETS NOT REQ. IN WALL SPACES LESS THAN 12”.

4. GFI PROTECTION REQUIRED FOR COUNTERTOP OUTLETS

5. AT LEAST 50% OF LIGHTING WATTAGE TO BE FLUORESCENT OR OTHER APPROVED HIGH EFFICACY DEVICE

6. DO NOT SCALE APPLIANCE LOCATIONS FROM DRAWING. CONFIRM ALL LOCATIONS WITH CLIENT AT TIME OF

ROUGH-IN

BATHROOMS

1. PROVIDE MIN. 20A BRANCH CIRCUIT TO RECEPTACLES WITH NO OTHER OUTLETS. IF 20A BRANCH SUPPLIES SINGLE BATHROOM, LIGHTING IN SAME BATHROOM ALLOWED. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ALLOWED UNDER SPECIAL

CIRCUMSTANCES

2. AT LEAST ONE GFI OUTLET WITHIN 36” OF OUTSIDE EDGE OF SINK

3. ALL LIGHTING TO BE FLUORESCENT OR ACTIVATED BY TITLE 24 APPROVED SWITCH, WILL AUTOMATICALLY TURN OFF WITHIN 30 MINUTES IF NO ACTIVITY FROM MOTION DETECTOR

LAUNDRY

1. MIN. 20A BRANCH CIRCUIT TO RECEPTACLES WITH NO OTHER OUTLETS

FIRE RATED WALLS

1. 24” MIN. SPACING BETWEEN STEEL RECEPTACLE BOXES THAT ARE “BACK-TO-BACK”. OPENINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 SQ.IN. FOR ANY 100 SF OF WALL AREA

SMOKE DETECTORS

1. SMOKE DETECTORS MUST BE WITHIN 24” OF HIGHEST POINT IN ROOM. DETECTORS REQ. IN EACH BEDROOM, HALL OR AREA IMMEDIATELY OUTSIDE BEDROOMS(S), TOP OF STAIRS, AND A MINIMUM OF 1 DETECTOR AT EACH FLOOR.

DETECTORS TO BE WIRED TOGETHER WITH BATTERY BACKUP

INTERIOR RECEPTACLES

1. NO POINT ALONG THE FLOOR LINE IN WALL SPACE SHALL BE MORE THAN 6 FT FROM OUTLET WHEN MEASURED HORIZONTALLY. OUTLET NOT REQ. FOR WALL SPACE LESS THAN 24”

2. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BOTTOM OF RECEPTACLE BOXES TO BE 14” ABOVE THE SUBFLOOR OR SLAB

3. BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY BEDROOM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN ARC-FAULT CIRCUIT

INTERRUPTER

4. ALL 125V & 20A RECEPTACLE OUTLETS SHALL BE LISTED TAMPER RESISTANT PER CEC 406.12

5. PROVIDE 30A CIRCUIT FOR ELECTRIC CLOTHES DRYER. CEC 220.54

EXTERIOR RECEPTACLES

1. WEATHERPROOF, GFI, TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES
REQ. AT ENTRANCE AND YARDS, NO MORE THAN 6’-½”
ABOVE GRADE (CEC 210.8, 406.9(B), 406.12, 210.52(E)).

SWITCHES

1. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, BOTTOM OF SWITCH BOXES
TO BE 40” ABOVE SUBFLOOR OR SLAB

2. DOOR BELL SWITCH TO BE NO MORE THAN 48” ABOVE

LANDING

GROUNDING

1. UFER AT SERVICE DISCONNECT - CONNECT #4 CU GROUND
ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR TO #4 FOOTING REBAR WITH A
MINIMUM LENGTH OF 20 FT OR EMBED 20 LF OF #4 CU
CONDUCTOR IN FOOTING. UFER TO HAVE A MIN. OF 2”

CONCRETE ENCASEMENT

2. BOND ALL METAL PIPING (COLD WATER, HOT WATER)

CONDUCTORS

1. ALL CONDUCTORS TO BE COPPER WITH TYPE THHN/THWN

INSULATION MINIMUM
2 N NOTES

KEYNOTES

1. NEW PIONEER 9000-BTU 115V 20 SEER DUCTLESS
MINISPLIT HEAT PUMP (MODEL #WYT009ALFI19RL).

MOUNT AIR HANDLER ON INTERIOR WALL AT 6’-4” ABOVE
FLOOR. MOUNT CONDENSER UNIT ON EXTERIOR WALL
AT 7’-0” ABOVE GRADE WITH FUSE DISCONNECT BOX.

SEE SHEET T3 FOR CF1R-ALT-02 FORM. PROVIDE A GFCI

PROTECTED, WEATHERPROOF RECEPTACLE OUTLET
WITHIN 25 FT OF THE UNIT (CEC 210.8(A)(3), 210.63(A)).

2. COMBINED SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM AC

PRIMARY POWER TO BE SUPPLIED FROM UNSWITCHED
PORTION OF BRANCH CIRCUIT 1, ALSO USED FOR
POWER AND LIGHTING (CFC 907.2.10 AND NFPA
72-29.6.3). INSTALL IONIZATION SMOKE ALARM WITH AN

ALARM-SILENCING SWITCH OR PHOTOELECTRIC SMOKE
ALARM, 10 FT OR GREATER FROM PERMANENTLY
INSTALLED COOKING APPLIANCES (CFC 907.2.10.3).

3. BATHROOM LIGHT CONTROLLED BY A VACANCY SENSOR
PER CEC TABLE 150(K)(2)(J). BATH

FAN/LIGHT/NIGHTLIGHT COMBO, TO BE SEPARATELY
SWITCHED (CEC 150.0(K)(2)(B)). SHOWER LIGHT LABELED
“SUITABLE FOR WET LOCATIONS” OR “SUITABLE FOR
DAMP LOCATIONS” (CEC 410.10(A)). THE EXHAUST RATE
OF THE BATHROOM FAN SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 50
CFM FOR INTERMITTENT OPERATION AND 20 CFM FOR
CONTINUOUS OPERATION (CMC 405.3.1).

4. ADD NEW 125 AMP SUBPANEL TO SERVE ADU, IN WALL
CABINET FACING LIVING AREA. PROVIDE 36” CLEARANCE
IN FRONT OF PANEL, 30” WIDE, 6'-6” HIGH FOR
HEADROOM (CEC 110.26).

5. INSTALL RHEEM 20 GAL ELECTRIC WATER HEATER
(MODEL #XE20P06PU20U0), COMPLIANT WITH
PROVISIONS OF CPC 508.4. MOUNT IN ATTIC ABOVE

BATHROOM CEILING, WITH CLEARANCES PER
MANUFACTURER’S SPEC. PROVIDE PASSAGEWAY FROM

ACCESS TO APPLIANCE WITH SOLID FLOORING NOT
LESS THAN 24” WIDE (CMC 304.4.2). A 30” X 30”

PLATFORM SHALL BE PROVIDED IN FRONT OF THE
SERVICE SIDE OF THE APPLIANCE (304.4.3). A LIGHT

FIXTURE AND CONVENIENCE OUTLET SHALL BE
PROVIDED NEAR THE APPLIANCE. SWITCH

CONTROLLING THE LIGHT FIXTURE SHALL BE LOCATED
AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE PASSAGEWAY (CMC 304.4.4).

6. MICROWAVE WITH RANGE HOOD INSTALLED ABOVE
RANGE. THE RANGE HOOD FAN SHALL RUN
INTERMITTENTLY (CMC 405.4). FOR

INTERMITTENT-CONTROLLED OPERATIONS, THE
EXHAUST RATE SHALL BE A MIN OF 100 CFM (CMC
405.4.1). EXHAUST DUCTS FOR RANGE HOOD AND
BATHROOM FAN TO TERMINATE 3 FT FROM PROPERTY
LINES, 3 FT FROM OPENINGS INTO THE BUILDING, AND
10 FT FROM FORCED AIR INLETS (CMC 502.2).
(N) STUDIO ROOM
(N) BATHROOM

ELECTRICAL LEGEND

SWITCHES
TAG: SWITCH TYPE
(NONE) SWITCH
3 3 WAY

RECEPTACLES - NON SWITCHED
TAG: SWITCH TYPE
(NONE) STANDARD DUPLEX

GFI GFI

R RANGE

REF REFRIGERATOR

W/D WASHER/DRYER

WH DEDICATED WATER HEATER CIRCUIT

SMOKE AND CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR
NOTES

1. REVIEW OUTLET, FIXTURE, & SWITCH LOCATIONS

WITH OWNER PRIOR TO WIRING

2. CENTER LIGHTS ON CEILING U.O.N.

LIGHTING LEGEND

LINEAR UNDERCABINET FIXTURE

RECESSED CAN LIGHT

PENDANT FIXTURE

WALL MOUNT FIXTURE

BATHROOM EXHAUST FAN

EXTERIOR EMERGENCY WALL LIGHT
NOTES

1. LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE

CENTERED ON CEILINGS

UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE

2. REVIEW LIGHT LOCATIONS WITH

OWNER DURING ROUGH-IN

3. PROVIDE “HIGH EFFICACY” LED

LIGHTING WHERE LED LIGHTING

IS NOTED
S
S/CO
M
S
1 M
S
1 S/CO
2 3
S
S
GFI
S
GFI

REF GFI GFI R
WH

GFI GFI
S S S
4 5 W
H
6 GFI
S
3 3
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
4937

CONSTRUCTION
BEST

MANAGEMENT

PRACTICES
A4
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5038

GREEN BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS
G1
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
X
XXXXX
XXX
X
X
X
X
X

XXXXXXXX
No. Description Date 1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3) Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5139

GREEN BUILDING

REQUIREMENTS
G2
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
X
XXXXXX
XXX

XXXXXXXX
XXX
No. Description Date 1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3) Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5240
TITLE 24
T1
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303

LAUREL ADUO GARAGE CONVERSION CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO
1174 LAUREL AVE
EAST PALO ALTO, 94303
TBD
TBD

LAUREL ADUO GARAGE CONVERSION
10/4/23
1174 LAUREL AVE
70 DEGREES WEST OF NORTH

EAST PALO ALTO
1 94303

ELECTRIC
3 400

SINGLE FAMILY
400
INSULATION; FENESTRATION/GLAZING ADDL SPACE CONDITIONING SYSTEM; WATER HEATER
WALL
WOOD
2X4
12” O.C.
15 N/A

0.095

4.3.1 A-4

0.125

ADDING EXTERIOR WALL

INSULATION TO EXISTING
WALLS

CEILING
WOOD
2X4
24” O.C.
30 N/A

0.031

4.2.1 A-20

0.031
6:12
NOT IN CLIMATE ZONES 2,4,9,10,12,14

NO DUCTS ARE INSTALLED IN ATTIC

EXCEPTION
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5341
TITLE 24
T2
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
ADDING NET 68 SF OF GLAZING
74 1800

0.30 N/A

0.23 N/A

OPERABLE

NON-METAL
N/A
N, S, E 2
16 N, 16 S, 16 E 0

0.3 NFRC

0.23 NFRC
N/A
N/A

OPERABLE

NON-METAL
N/A E280

0.3 NFRC

0.23 NFRC
N/A
N/A
AB

OPERABLE

NON-METAL
N/A W20
12 0.3
NFRC

0.23 NFRC
N/A
N/A D
68 74
X
12 18
X

0.3 0.3
X

0.23 0.23
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
No. Description Date 1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3) Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5442
TITLE 24
T3
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
12 X
68 X

0.3 0.3
X

0.23 0.23
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

MINISPLIT ADU X
X

ADU WATER HEATER
DHW
4 CONSUMER STORAGE
20 GAL

ELECTRICITY
1 DEREK OUYANG

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
10/4/23
N/A
(626)246-8299

DEREK OUYANG

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
10/4/23
N/A
(626)246-8299
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5543
CF1R-ALT-02
T4
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5644

RESIDENTIAL

MANDATORY

MEASURES

SUMMARY
T5
PREPARED BY:

CITY SYSTEMS
157 MIRAMONTE RD
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1174 LAUREL AVE -

DETACHED ADU
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO,
CA, 94303
No. Description Date
1 ZONING CLEARANCE

SUBMISSION
10/15/23
2 ZONING CLEARANCE

RESUBMISSION
11/6/23
3 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/6/24
4 BUILDING REVIEW

RESUBMISSION
1/19/24
Designer Signature, 1/24/24:

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Brandon Wofford
01/24/2024
5745

GENERAL

1. GOVERNING CODES: ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 24: CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE:
• 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)
• 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC)
• 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)
• 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE (CEC),
• 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)
• 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEC)

2. THE NOTES ON THE STRUCTURAL PLANS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THESE NOTES.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE BEFORE COMMENCING WORK AND SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

4. OMISSIONS OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE DRAWINGS, NOTES, AND

DETAILS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND RESOLVED BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

5. DETAILS SHOWN SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT AT ALL APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS WHETHER SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT OR NOT.

6. THE CLIENT/CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE MUST SUBMIT IN WRITING FOR ANY INQUIRIES OR MODIFICATION REQUESTS FOR THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW DO NOT CONSTITUTE "IN WRITING" UNLESS IT IS CLEARLY NOTED THAT SPECIFIC CHANGES ARE BEING REQUESTED.

7. UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, NO STRUCTURAL MEMBER SHALL BE CUT,

DRILLED, OR NOTCHED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD.

8. CONSTRUCTION METHOD AND PROJECT SAFETY: THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND

SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE AND DO NOT INDICATE METHODS, PROCEDURES OR SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO MAINTAIN AND INSURE THE INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION. HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING WILL NOT ENFORCE SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS.

CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY DEVICES, INCLUDING

SHORING AND BRACING, AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMING TO ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS AND REGULATONS.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

1. HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT MAY BE ON THE SITE.

2. HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING HAS NOT PERFORMED INVESTIGATIONS TO DETERMINE THE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. THE OWNER WILL PROVIDE THE RESULTS OF SUCH INVESTIGATIONS IF THEY HAVE BEEN PERFORMED.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT PERSONNEL WITHIN THE WORK AREA ARE PROTECTED FROM EXPOSURE TO HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. IF HAZARDOUS

MATERIALS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY CEASE WORK UNTIL CONDITIONS CAN BE MAINTAINED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.

WOOD NOTES

1. ALL WOOD CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PER CBC, CHAPTER 23.

2. ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH AND MUST CONFORM TO THE GRADING RULES OF THE WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ANY ADDITIONAL APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. ALL PRESSURE TREATED LUMBER TO BE STAMPED BY AN APPROVED GRADING AGENCY.

3. STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL BE (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED):

A. BEAMS & POSTS (2x AND 4x) NO. 2
B. BEAMS & POSTS (6x OR LARGER) NO. 1
C. STUDS NO. 2 (2x4, 3x4, 2x6 AND 3x6)
D. JOISTS NO. 2

4. NEW STUD AND POST SIZES SHALL BE (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED):

A. STUD WALLS 2x4 @ 16” ON CENTER FOR INTERIOR WALLS, OR S.A.D. 2x6 @ 16” ON CENTER FOR EXTERIOR WALLS & PLUMBING WALLS & SHEAR WALLS
B. POSTS AS MINIMUM SHALL HAVE WIDTH TO MATCH BEAM WIDTH ABOVE AND DEPTH TO MATCH WALL THICKNESS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

5. ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER SHALL HAVE A MAXIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT OF 19% AT TIME OF INSTALLATION.

6. ALL NAILS USED IN TIMBER-TO-TIMBER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE COMMON WIRE NAILS AND NAILING SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES. WHERE NAILS TEND TO SPLIT THE WOOD, NAIL HOLES SHALL BE PREDRILLED.

7. ALL NAILS CONNECTING PRE-MANUFACTURED METAL ITEMS (CONNECTORS, HANGERS, STRAPS, ETC) TO TIMBER SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUFACTURER'S CATALOGUE AND APPLICABLE ICCES EVALUATION REPORTS.

8. ALL STUD WALLS SHALL HAVE 2x FIRE BLOCKING AT 10'-0" O.C. MAXIMUM.

9. WALL STUDS SHALL ALIGN WITH FLOOR AND ROOF JOISTS FOR FULL HEIGHT OF STRUCTURE.

10. 2x BLOCKING SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN JOISTS AND RAFTERS OVER SUPPORTS.

11. WHERE WOOD IS IN CONTACT WITH EARTH, CONCRETE OR MASONRY, PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR-LARCH SHALL BE USED.

12. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SILL PLATES IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH 5/8"ø ANCHOR BOLTS WITH 7” EMBEDMENT AT 4'-0" O.C. W/ 3"x3"x1/4" PLATE WASHERS.

13. ALL BOLT HEADS AND NUTS WHICH BEAR AGAINST THE FACE OF WOOD MEMBERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH WASHERS. NO UPSET THREADS ARE ALLOWED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

14. PROVIDE POST OR MULTIPLE STUDS FOR SOLID BEARING AT THE ENDS OF ALL BEAMS OR GIRDER TRUSSES WHERE POSTS ARE NOT SHOWN.

15. PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING AT BEARING WALLS UNDER PERPENDICULAR PARTITIONS. PROVIDE DOUBLE FLOOR JOISTS UNDER PARALLEL PARTITIONS.

16. MINIMUM SPLICE NAILING OF DOUBLE PLATES TO BE AS FOLLOWS: SIXTEEN (16) 16d EACH SIDE OF SPLICE WITH NO ADJACENT SPLICE WITHIN 4'-0". SEE TYPICAL DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

17. FACE NAIL TWO PIECE BUILT-UP BEAMS WITH 16d AT 12" O.C. STAGGERED AT TOP AND BOTTOM TO ALTERNATE SIDES OF BEAM. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ROW OF NAILING AT ALL BEAMS GREATER THAN 12" DEEP.

18. BOLT HOLES IN WOOD SHALL BE THE DIAMETER OF THE BOLT PLUS 1/16”, MAXIMUM.

19. PRE-DRILL ALL HOLES FOR 20d AND LARGER NAILS, SPIKES AND LAG BOLTS. LEAD HOLES FOR LAGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:

A. SHANK PORTION:SAME DIAMETER AND LENGTH AS SHANK.

B. THREADED PORTION: 60% TO 75% OF THE DIAMETER OF THE THREAD AND THE SAME LENGTH AS THREAD.

20. HOLES FOR PIPES EXCEEDING ONE-THIRD OF THE PLATE WIDTH SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN PARTITIONS USED AS SHEAR WALLS AND BEARING WALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED. PIPES SHALL PASS THROUGH THE CENTER OF THE PLATES. NOTCHING IS NOT ALLOWED.

21. PROVIDE 2x SOLID BLOCKING AT A MINIMUM OF 8'-0" O.C. FOR SOLID SAWN JOISTS WHERE

SHEATHING OR GYPSUM BOARD IS NOT APPLIED TO TOP AND BOTTOM OF JOISTS FOR ENTIRE LENGTH OF JOIST.

22. ALL PREMANUFACTURED METAL ITEMS (CONNECTORS, HANGERS, STRAPS, ETC.) SHALL BE BY SIMPSON STRONG TIE COMPANY, INC. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

23. RETIGHTEN ALL BOLTS BEFORE CLOSING IN.

24. USE SIMPSON MASONRY ANCHORS TITEN HD (ESR-1056) FOR WOOD TO MASONRY CONNECTION.

25. ALL BOLTS, SCREWS, NAILS AND CONNECTORS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE GALVANIZED. ALL BOLTS, SCREWS, NAILS AND CONNECTORS IN CONTACT WITH PRESSURE

TREATED LUMBER SHALL BE HOTDIP ZINC COATED GALVANIZED OR STAINLESS STEEL PER SECTION 2304.9.5.

26. DO NOT NOTCH ANY MEMBERS WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED IN THESE DRAWINGS AND DETAILS.

DIMENSIONAL CONTROL

1. DO NOT USE SCALED DIMENSIONS. WHERE NO WRITTEN DIMENSION IS PROVIDED, CONSULT WITH THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR CLARIFICATION BEFORE PROCEEDING.

2. VERIFICATION: VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES.

DESIGN CRITERIA

1. APPLICABLE CODE: CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CBC) 2019 EDITION, PART 2.

2. LIVE LOADS:

A. ROOF (BASIC LIVE LOAD): 20 PSF
B. CEILING (UNINHABITABLE ATTIC W/OUT STORAGE): 10 PSF

3. WIND DESIGN PARAMETERS:

A. BASIC WIND SPEED: 91 MPH
B. EXPOSURE: B
C. WIND IMPORTANCE FACTOR: Iw=1.0

4. SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS:

A. OCCUPANCY CATEGORY: 2, STANDARD
B. SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY: D
C. SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR: Ie = 1.0
D. LATITUDE: 37.4711863 NORTH
E. LONGITUDE: 122.1509877 WEST
F. SITE CLASS: D
G. MAPPED MCE ACCELERATIONS
• Ss = 1.500
• S1 = 0.600
H. SITE COEFFICIENT AT SHORT PERIOD
• Fa = 1.20
• Fv = 1.70
I. ADJUSTED MCE SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION PARAMETERS:
• SDS = 1.200
• SD1 = 0.680

5. STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS:

1. A. BEARING WALL SYSTEM

2. 15. LIGHT FRAME WALLS SHEATHED WITH WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS RATED FOR

SHEAR RESISTANCE

3. R = 6.5 (RESPONSE MODIFICATION COEFFICIENT)

4. Ωo = 2.5 (OVERSTRENGTH FACTOR)

5. Cd = 4 (DEFLECTION AMPLIFICATION FACTOR)

6. V = 0.1538 x W (DESIGN BASE SHEAR)

6. FOUNDATION DESIGN VALUES:

A. BEARING CAPACITY (DL ONLY) 1500 PSF
B. BEARING CAPACITY (DL + LL) 1500 PSF
C. BEARING CAPACITY (DL+LL+E/W) 2000 PSF

CONCRETE

1. REINFORCING STEEL
ALL BARS, U.O.N.: ASTM A615, GR 60 OR ASTM A706, DEFORMED.

2. MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER
CAST AGAINST & EXPOSED TO EARTH.................3"
EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER.......................2"
NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT WITH GROUND:

SLABS, WALLS, JOISTS..............................................3/4"

3. CONCRETE MIXES FOR (N) CONCRETE ONLY
MIX ID USE STRENGTH, f'c WEIGHT
A FOOTINGS 2,500 PSI NORMAL
B CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE 2,500 PSI NORMAL

4. CHAIRS, SPACERS, AND SAND PLATES: AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN CONCRETE COVER.

5. VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DOWELED TO SUPPORTING MEMBERS WITH THE SAME SIZE AND SPACING OF REINFORCEMENT AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS AND GENERAL NOTES.

6. ANCHOR BOLTS, DOWELS, AND HOLD DOWN SECURELY HELD IN PLACE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND OBSERVATION BY A INSPECTING AGENCY.

7. ADMIXTURES: REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER. CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR ADDED CHLORIDES ARE NOT PERMITTED.

8. VIBRATION: ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE CONSOLIDATED WITH MECHANICAL VIBRATORS.

FOUNDATION NOTES

1. INSTALLATION OF THE FOOTINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE DEPTH BELOW FINISHED OR NATURAL GRADE SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM ACCORDING TO THE FOUNDATION DETAILS ON THE DRAWINGS.

FIELD DISCOVERED CONDITIONS MAY NECESSITATE DEEPER FOUNDATIONS.

2. ALL WATER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS PRIOR TO PLACING OF CONCRETE.

3. ALL BACKFILL WITH ENGINEERED FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% RELATIVE DENSITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

4. FOOTINGS AND GRADE BEAMS SHALL BE CENTERED UNDER BEARING WALLS ABOVE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

5. VERIFY LOCATIONS FOR OPENINGS OR PENETRATIONS THROUGH CONCRETE, CONCRETE CURBS, FLOOR DEPRESSIONS, FLOOR SLOPES AND DRAINS, INSERTS, ETC. PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND OTHER DRAWINGS.

TESTS, INSPECTIONS, AND OBSERVATIONS NOTES

1. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL ITEMS AS REQUIRED BY THE CBC, CHAPTER 17.

2. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RETAINING AN INDEPENDENT TESTING AND

INSPECTION LABORATORY QUALIFIED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO PERFORM ALL REQUIRED TESTING AND INSPECTIONS.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE TESTING AND INSPECTION

LABORATORY WITH CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES TO ENSURE PROPER COORDINATION OF WORK.

4. THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR SHALL SUBMIT INSPECTION REPORTS TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. THE REPORTS SHALL INDICATE WHETHER WORK INSPECTED CONFORMED TO THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. ANY

DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR CORRECTION. IF DISCREPANCIES ARE NOT CORRECTED, THEY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND ENGINEER OF RECORD.

5. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHALL BE INSPECTED BY AN APPROVED TESTING AND INSPECTION LABORATORY:

A. CONCRETE (CBC 1705.3)
a. POST-INSTALLED ANCHORS WITH EPOXY

6. IN ADDITION TO SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIED ITEMS SHALL HAVE

PERIODIC STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD OR A

PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AT THE FOLLOWING BENCH MARKS:

A. REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE FORMWORK, AND ANCHOR EMBEDMENTS PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR.

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR INSPECTOR A MINIMUM OF 48

HOURS (EXCLUDING WEEKEND DAYS) PRIOR TO THE TIME OF A REQUIRED INSPECTION AND OBSERVATION.

CONVERSION OF EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE TO

PROPOSED DETACHED ADU

SHEET LIST
Sheet Name
S0.0 GENERAL NOTES - STRUCTURAL
S1.0 FOUNDATION PLAN
S1.1 ROOF AND CEILING FRAMING PLAN
S2.0 DETAILS
S2.1 DETAILS
S2.2 DETAILS

LAUREL AVE ADU
ADDRESS: 1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA, 94303
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.

As indicated
1/24/2024 10:41:31 AM
S0.0

GENERAL NOTES -

STRUCTURAL
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
DA
JG

VICINITY MAP
PROJECT ADDRESS:
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST
PALO ALTO, CA, 94303

SCOPE OF WORK
No. Description Date

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
4658
5" THICK CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE W/ #4 REBARS @ 16" O.C., EA.

DIR. AT CENTER OF SLAB, OVER 15 MIL VAPOR BARRIER, OVER 7"

CLEAN CRUSHED ROCK, SEE DETAIL
1 2/S2.1
TYP. DOWEL CONNECTION,
SEE 3/S2.1
TYP. SLAB ON GRADE
CONC. FTG.

PER PLAN
CONC. CURB

OR STEM WALL

SHEAR WALL POST, SEE

SCHEDULE FOR HOLDOWN

AND ANCHOR CALLOUT
#

1. NEW CONCRETE SHALL BE CURED FOR TEN DAYS FROM TIME OF POUR BEFORE ANY LOAD MAYBE APPLIED.

2. CONCRETE SHALL DEVELOP A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI.

3. ALL ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO A.S.T.M. F1554 GR. 36 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

4. ALL SILL PLATES SHALL BE BOLTED TO FOUNDATION WITH 5/8"ø F1554 GR. 36 BOLTS SPACED 4'-0" MAX. U.O.N. EMBED BOLTS A MINIMUM OF 7" INTO CONCRETE. PROVIDE 3"x3"x1/4" WASHERS AT ALL A.B.'S. PROVIDE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS PER PLATE AND ONE BOLT 6" FROM THE END OF ALL PLATES.

5. FOOTINGS SHALL BE POURED ON FIRM, UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL. IF OVER-EXCAVATION OCCURS, RECOMPACT SOIL TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY.

6. ALL LUMBER EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR LUMBER IN DIRECT CONTACT W/ CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR RATED FOR EXTERIOR USE.

7. ALL METAL CONNECTORS EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE Z-MAX GALVANIZED OR RATED FOR EXTERIOR USE.

8. VERIFY IN FIELD THAT EXISTING FOOTING DIMENSIONS ARE AT MIN. 12" WIDE AND MIN. 12" DEPTH. OTHERWISE, FOLLOW DETAIL 5/S2.1 FOR

UNDERPINNING
1 1 2
A
B
2 2
2A
2A
SEE NOTE 8
(E) FTG.,
SEE NOTE 8
(E) FTG.,
SEE NOTE 8
(E) FTG.,
WIDE FTG.
(N) 15"
4 S2.1
2A 2A
2A
2A
6 S2.1
6 S2.1
6 S2.1
SIMPSON HDU2-SDS2.5 W/ SSTB20 ANCHOR BOLT, EMBED. 17" MIN. INTO CONC., (2) 2x OR 4x HOLDOWN POST
SIMPSON HDU2-SDS2.5 W/ 5/8"ø F1554 GR. 36 THREADED ROD W/ SIMPSON SET-XP EPOXY, EMBED. 10" MIN. INTO EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTING, (2) 2x OR 4x

HOLDOWN POST, SEE DETAIL
2 2A
6/S2.1
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.

As indicated
1/24/2024 10:41:32 AM
S1.0

FOUNDATION PLAN
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
DA
HSC

FOUNDATION LEGEND FOUNDATION CALL OUTS

FOUNDATION NOTES
1/4" = 1'-0"

FOUNDATION PLAN

FLOOR-TO-FOUNDATION HOLD

DOWN SCHEDULE
No. Description Date

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
4759
NEW SCISSOR ROOF TRUSSES @ 24" O.C., PER TRUSS

MANUFACTUROR
2x6 CEILING JOISTS @16" O.C.
1 2

TRUSSES

HEADERS / LEDGERS

POST, EMBEDDED IN STUDWALL,

WIDTH PER PLAN, DEPTH TO MATCH

STUDWALL, SEE DETAIL
POST
1/S2.2

CEILING JOISTS

1. NEW ROOF PLYWOOD SHALL BE 15/32" PERFORMANCE CATEGORY APA RATED SHEATHING, 32/16, STRUCTURAL 1, EXPOSURE 1 W/ 10d NAILS AT 6" E.N., 12" F.N., 6" B.N.

2. PLACE SHEAR PANEL ON SHEAR WALLS PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTERSECTING WALLS. SEE DETAIL 3/S3.0

3. ALL NAILS SHALL BE COMMON NAILS U.O.N. NAILS SHALL NOT BE DRIVEN CLOSER TOGETHER THAN 1/2 OF THEIR LENGTH NOR CLOSER TO THE EDGE OF THE MEMBER THAN 1/4 OF THEIR LENGTH. PREDRILL HOLES WHERE WOOD TENDS TO SPLIT. THE

PENETRATION OF THE NAIL INTO THE PIECE RECEIVING THE POINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/2 THE NAIL LENGTH.

4. ALL HEADERS AT DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS SHALL BE THE FOLLOWING U.O.N.:

A. 4x8 D.F. #2 MIN @ 2x4 STUDWALL
B. 6x8 D.F. #1 MIN @ 2x6 STUDWALL

5. EXTERIOR STUD WALLS SHALL HAVE 15/32" PERFORMANCE CATEGORY APA RATED SHEATHING, 32/16, STRUCTURAL 1, EXPOSURE 1 W/ 10d NAILS AT 6" E.N., 12" F.N., 6" B.N., TYP. U.O.N. ON SHEAR WALL PLANS.

6. ALL LUMBER EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR LUMBER IN DIRECT CONTACT W/ CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED OR RATED FOR EXTERIOR USE.

7. ALL METAL CONNECTORS EXPOSED TO WEATHER SHALL BE Z-MAX GALVANIZED OR RATED FOR EXTERIOR USE.

8. STUDWALL TO BE 2x4 @12" O.C., PROVIDE NEW STUDS AS NECESSARY. 1 2
A
B
TYP. HEADER, SEE

ROOF FRAMING
NOTE 4
HDR.
6 8'-6" SHEAR WALL
6 6
6 8
S2.1
8 S2.1
7 S2.1
HDR.

HDR. HDR.
7 S2.1
1 8'-6" SHEAR WALL
TYP. STUDWALL, 2x4 @ 12"
O.C., PROVIDE NEW STUDS

AS NECESSARY, SEE
DETAIL 1/S2.0
6'-0" SHEAR WALL
6'-0" SHEAR WALL
2 HDR.

1. SEE TYPICAL SHEAR WALL DETAIL FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND FRAMING INFORMATION.

2. ALL NAILS SHALL BE COMMON NAILS U.O.N. NAILS SHALL NOT BE DRIVEN CLOSER TOGETHER THAN 1/2 OF THEIR LENGTH NOR CLOSER TO THE EDGE OF THE MEMBER THAN 1/4 OF THEIR LENGTH. PREDRILL HOLES WHERE WOOD TENDS TO SPLIT. THE PENETRATION OF THE NAIL INTO THE PIECE RECEIVING THE POINT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/2 THE NAIL LENGTH.

3. ALL SHEAR WALLS LABELED AS "PERFORATED" SHALL HAVE CS16

STRAP ABOVE AND BELOW WINDOW OPENINGS, AND ABOVE DOOR
OPENINGS, PER DETAIL 2/S2.0
2/S2.0

SHEAR WALL PLYWOOD AND ANCHOR BOLT SCHEDULE
Min. Plywood
Thickness
6 4
3 2
15/32"
15/32"
15/32"
15/32"
15/32"
15/32"
15/32"
Plywood
Grade
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
STRUCT. 1
Common
Nail Size
10d
10d
10d
10d
10d
10d
10d
Edge
Nailing
6" o.c.
4" o.c.
3" o.c.
2" o.c.
4" o.c.
3" o.c.
2" o.c.

Field
Nailing
12" o.c.
12" o.c.
12" o.c.
12" o.c.
12" o.c.
12" o.c.
12" o.c.

Unsupported
Panel Edges
Blocked
Blocked
Blocked
Blocked
Blocked
Blocked
Blocked
Panel Edge
Studs Required
2x
2x
3x
3x
3x
3x
3x
Allowable
Shear lbs/ft
340
510
665
870
1020
1330
1740
Sole Plate Nailing
16d Face
8 1/2" o.c.
5 1/2" o.c.
4 1/2" o.c.
3 1/2" o.c.
5 1/2" o.c.
4 1/2" o.c.
3 1/2" o.c.

Shear Clip
Spacing
(2)
16" o.c.
10" o.c.
9" o.c.
6" o.c.
6" o.c.
6" o.c.
12" o.c.
(4)
NOTE:

1. PLYWOOD MAY BE INSTALLED ON EITHER SIDE OF STUD WALL.

2. SHEAR CLIPS SHALL BE A35 CLIPS U.O.N., LTP4 CLIPS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF A35 CLIPS.

3. ANCHOR BOLTS INTO NEW CONCRETE FOOTING SHALL BE 5/8"ø GALV. HOOKED ANCHOR BOLTS WITH A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF 7". ANCHOR BOLTS INTO EXISTING CONCRETE FOUNDATION SHALL BE SIMPSON 5/8"ø TITEN HD (ESR-2713) WITH A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF 5 3/4". PROVIDE 3x3x1/4" PLATE WASHER AT EACH ANCHOR BOLT.

4. SHEAR CLIPS AT SHALL BE HSLQ37 HEAVY SHEAR TRANSFER ANGLE.

5. CALLOUT INDICATES PLYWOOD ON BOTH SIDES OF SHEAR WALL.

Anchor Bolt
Spacing
(3)
44 33
22 48" o.c.
36" o.c.
36" o.c.
24" o.c.
24" o.c.
18" o.c.
12" o.c.

Sill Plate
Size
2x
2x
3x
3x
3x
3x
3x
(5)
(5)
(5)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
22 PLYWOOD SHEAR WALL

PLYWOOD LENGTH

MINIMUM SHEAR

FLOOR-TO-FLOOR HOLD DOWN

PLYWOOD AND ANCHOR BOLT TYPE
# #
# FLOOR-TO-FOUNDATION HOLD DOWN
#
#
#
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.

As indicated
1/24/2024 10:41:32 AM
S1.1

ROOF AND CEILING

FRAMING PLAN
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
DA
HSC

ROOF FRAMING CALL OUTS

FRAMING LEGEND

ROOF FRAMING NOTES
1/4" = 1'-0"

ROOF AND CEILING FRAMING PLAN

SHEAR WALL NOTES

SHEAR WALL LEGEND
No. Description Date

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
6048

WIDTH OF OPENING
TYP. CONCRETE FLOOR OR CURB CONDITION
(BEARING WALL - PLYWOOD SHEATHING)
TYP. CONCRETE FLOOR OR CURB CONDITION
(NON-BEARING WALL )
SINKER NAILS EA. SIDE
LAP PLATES 48" MIN. W/ (16) 16d
HEADER
4" MIN.
9" MAX.

END OF SILL OR

SILL SPLICE OR

HOLE EXCEEDING
1/3 SILL WIDTH
5/8"ø GALV. HOOKED A.B.'S @ 48"
O.C. MAX. MIN. 2 PER PIECE.

SPACING @ SHEAR WALL PER PLAN
2x SILL, (2) 2x SILL
@ OPENING
LARGER THAN 4'-0"
2-16d END NAILS
OR 4-10d TOE
NAILS @ EA.

STUD
16d @ 16" O.C. TO

JOIST OR BLOCKING
@ NON-BEARING
WALLS
2x SOLID BLKG.
@ 6'-0" MAX.

WHERE WALL
HEIGHT
EXCEEDS 10'-0"
2-16d END
NAILS OR 2-10d
TOE NAILS EA.

END
MIN. 2x4 / 2x6 STUDS
@ 16" O.C. MAX. TYP.

AT BEARING & SHEAR
WALLS U.O.N. ON
PLANS S.A.D. FOR
SIZE OF NONBEARING WALLS

SEE NAILING

SCHEDULE FOR

ATTACHMENT OF

JOIST & BLOCKING

AT BEARING WALLS

SPLICE TOP PLATE ONLY

OVER STUD SUPPORTS
4-10d TOE NAILS
2-16d TO EA. MEMBER OF BUILT-UP
HEADER (20d @ 3x STUDS). HUC
HANGER @ 4x & 6x MEMBERS
2-16d LOWER PLATE
TO EA. STUD
LAP PLATES & 2-16d FACE
NAILS @ CORNERS AND

INTERSECTIONS
3 STUDS MIN. @

CORNERS &

INTERSECTIONS
3-16d FACE NAIL AT
EXT. WALLS
DBL. STUDS @

OPENINGS LARGER
THAN 4'-0" U.O.N.
2" NOM. CRIPPLE TYP. 2-2"
NOM. CRIPPLES AT OPENINGS
LARGER THAN 6'-0"
3x PTDF SILL
4-10d T.N.
16d @ 24" O.C. @ 2x
20d @ 24" O.C. @ 3x
TYP. WOOD FLOOR

CONDITION
.

MIN. 1/2" GROUT BED

REQ'D UNDER ALL
WALLS WHERE CONC. IS

NOT LEVEL FOR FULL

BEARING OF SILL PLATE

0.157 HILTI POWER DRIVEN PINS
(MIN. 1 1/2" EMBED INTO CONC.)
ICC REPORT NO. 2269 @ 16" O.C.

MAX. MIN. 3 PINS PER PIECE
7" MIN. EMBED
2x SILL PLATE @

WOOD FLOOR

CONDITION
A34 CLIP EA, SIDE OF
POST, U.O.N., T&B OF
POST
A35 TYP.
3" MIN.
8" MAX.

BEAM PER PLAN W/
A34 CLIP, EA. SIDE
OF BM., TYP.

CRIPPLE POST

PER PLAN
2x BLKG. ABOVE

BEARING WALLS
HDR. PER PLAN
TYP. TOP PLATE

SPLICE, WHERE
OCCURS
12"
12"

DBL TOP PLATE
EN. @ JOINT

HOLDOWN POST,
(STAGGER)

PER PLAN
E.N.

HOLDOWN

PER SCHEDULE
E.N. @ SILL PLATE
(STAGGER)

STUD, PER PLAN

JOINT STUD,

PER SHEAR
WALL SCHED.

NOTES:

1. FOR ITEMS NOT NOTED, SEE PLAN & SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE

2. MINIMUM PANEL DIMENSION IS 2'-0"

3. USE FULL SIZE PANELS WHERE POSSIBLE

4. FIELD NAILING (FN.) @ 12" U.O.N.

5. [3x] SOLID BLKG. @ HORIZ. JOINTS
E.N.

DISTANCE, TYP.
1/2" MIN. EDGE

ANCHOR OR POST

INSTALLED ANCHOR

PER PLAN
3x BLKG. @ ALL

PLYWOOD JOINTS,
PROVIDE E.N. TYP.

PER SCHEDULE

SILL PLATE NAILS

PER SCHEDULE

FLOOR TO FLOOR

CONNECTION

PER PLAN SHEAR CLIP PER

SCHEDULE

PLYWOOD JOINT
HDR. PER PLAN,

PROVIDE EDGE
NAIL TYP.

SILL PLATE

PER SCHEDULE
EDGE NAIL TYP.

CS16 STRAP @

PERFORATED SHEAR
WALL, EXTEND 8'-0"

PAST OPENING OR TO

END OF SHEAR WALL
JOIST OR BLKG.

PER PLAN
F.N.

ANCHOR BOLT

PER SCHEDULE
FASTENING SCHEDULE [2016 CBC TABLE 2304.10.1] - THE FOLLOWING ARE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE FASTENING SCHEDULE BASED ON THE 2016 CA BUILDING CODE. a. Nails spaced at 6 inches at intermediate supports where spans are 48" or more. For nailing of wood structural panel and particleboard diaphragms and shear walls, refer to Section 2305. Nails for wall sheathing are permitted to be common, box or casing.
b. Spacing shall be 6 inches on center on the edges and 12 inches on center at intermediate supports for nonstructural applications. Panel supports at 16 inches (20 inches if strength axis in the long direction of the panel, unless otherwise marked).
c. Where a rafter is fastened to an adjacent parallel ceiling joist in accordance with this schedule and the ceiling joist is fastened to the top plate in accordance with this schedule, the number of toenails in the rafters shall be permitted to be reduced by one nail.
**See Table 2304.10.1 for more information

ELEMENT / CONNECTION FASTENER LOCATION
ROOF

1. BLOCKING BETWEEN CEILING

JOISTS, RAFTERS OR

TRUSSES TO TOP PLATE OR

OTHER FRAMING BELOW
3 - 8d COMMON (2 1/2" x 0.131")
3 - 10d BOX (3" x 0.128")
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

TOENAIL EACH END

BLOCKING BETWEEN

RAFTERS OR TRUSS NOT

AT THE WALL TOP PLATE,

TO RAFTER OR TRUSS
2 - 8d COMMON (2 1/2" x 0.131")
2 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
2 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES

TOENAIL EACH END
2 - 16d COMMON (3 1/2" x 0.162")
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES

END NAIL

FLAT BLOCKING TO TRUSS

AND WEB FILLER
16d COMMON (3 1/2" x 0.162") @ 6" O.C.
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS @ 6" O.C.
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES @ 6" O.C.

FACE NAIL

2. 3 - 8d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

CEILING JOISTS TO TOP
PLATE

TOENAIL EACH JOIST

3. CEILING JOISTS NOT ATTACHED

TO PARALLEL RAFTER, LAPS

OVER PARTITIONS (NO THRUST)
(TABLE AND SECTION2308.7.3.1)
3 - 16d COMMON
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

FACE NAIL

4. CEILING JOISTS ATTACHED TO

PARALLEL RAFTER (HEEL JOINT)
(TABLE AND SECTION 2308.7.3.1)
TABLE 2308.7.3.1 FACE NAIL
CEILING JOISTS TO TOP PLATE 3 - 10d COMMON
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

5. FACE NAIL
3 - 10d COMMON
3 - 16d BOX
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

6. RAFTER OR ROOF TRUSS TO

TOP PLATE ( TABLE AND
SECTION 2308.7.5)
TOENAIL(c)
2 - 16d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
3 - 10d COMMON
3 - 16d BOX
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

END NAIL

TOENAIL

7. ROOF RAFTERS TO RIDGE
VALLEY OR HIP RAFTERS; OR
ROOR RAFTER TO 2" RIDGE BEAM
WALL
16d COMMON
10d BOX
3" x 0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

8. 24" O.C. FACE NAIL
16" O.C. FACE NAIL

STUD TO STUD (NOT AT BRACED

WALL PANELS)

STUD TO STUD AND ABUTTING

STUDS AT INTERSECTING

WALL CORNERS (AT BRACED

WALL PANELS)
16d COMMON
16d BOX
3" x 0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
16" O.C. FACE NAIL
12" O.C. FACE NAIL
12" O.C. FACE NAIL

9. BUILT-UP HEADER 16d COMMON 16" O.C. EACH EDGE, FACE NAIL 12" O.C. EACH EDGE, FACE NAIL

10. 16d BOX

11. CONTINUOUS HEADER TO
STUD
4 - 8d COMMON
4 - 10d BOX

TOENAIL

12. TOP PLATE TO TOP PLATE 16d COMMON 16" O.C. FACE NAIL 10d BOX
3"x0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
12" O.C. FACE NAIL
8 - 16d COMMON
12 - 10d BOX
12 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
12 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

EACH SIDE OF END JOINT, FACE NAIL
(MIN 24" LAP SPLICE LENGTH EACH SIDE

OF END JOINT)

13. TOP PLATE TO TOP PLATE,

AT END JOINTS

BOTTOM PLATE TO JOIST,

RIM JOIST, BAND JOIST OR

BLOCKING (NOT AT BRACED

WALL PANELS)

14. 16d COMMON
16d BOX
3" x 0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
16" O.C. FACE NAIL
12" O.C. FACE NAIL

BOTTOM PLATE TO JOIST,

RIM JOIST, BAND JOIST OR

BLOCKING AT BRACED

WALL PANELS

15. 2 - 16d COMMON
3 - 16d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
16" O.C. FACE NAIL
FLOOR
3 - 16d COMMON
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

29. JOIST TO BAND JOIST OR RIM
JOIST

END NAIL
2 - 8d COMMON
2 - 10d BOX
2 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
2 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

30. BRIDGING OR BLOCKING TO

JOIST, RAFTER OR TRUSS

EACH END, TOENAIL

WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS, SUBFLOOR, ROOF AND INTERIOR WALL SHEATHING TO FRAMING AND PARTICLEBOARD WALL SHEATHING TO FRAMING(a) 6d COMMON OR DEFORMED (2" x

0.113") (SUBFLOOR AND WALL)
8d BOX OR DEFORMED (ROOF)
2 3/8" x 0.113" NAIL (SUBFLOOR AND
WALL)
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE

SUPPORTS

31. 3/8" - 1/2"
1 3/4" 16 GAGE STAPLE, 7/16" CROWN
2 3/8" x 0.113" NAIL (ROOF)
4" EDGE
8" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
1 3/4" 16 GAGE STAPLE, 7/16" CROWN
(ROOF)
3" EDGE
6" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
8d COMMON
6d DEFORMED
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
2 3/8" x 0.113 NAIL
2" 16 GAGE STAPLE, 7/16" CROWN
4" EDGE
8" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
10d COMMON
8d DEFORMED
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

32. 19/32" - 3/4"

33. 7/8" - 1/4"

OTHER EXTERIOR WALL SHEATHING
1 1/2" GALVANIZED ROOF NAIL
1 1/4" 16 GAGE STAPLE WITH 7/16" OR
1" CROWN
3" EDGE
6" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
1/2" FIBERBOARD SHEATHING(b) 34.
1 3/4" GALVANIZED ROOF NAIL
1 1/2" 16 GAGE STAPLE WITH 7/16" OR
1" CROWN
3" EDGE
6" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
25/32" FIBERBOARD SHEATHING(b) 35.

WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS, COMBINATION SUBFLOOR UNDERLAYMENT TO FRAMING

36. 3/4" AND LESS 8d COMMON
6d DEFORMED
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

37. 7/8" - 1" 8d COMMON
8d DEFORMED
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

38. 1 1/8" - 1 1/4" 10d COMMON
8d DEFORMED
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

PANEL SIDING TO FRAMING

39. 40.
1/2" OR LESS 6d CORROSION - RESISTANT SIDING
6d CORROSION - RESISTANT CASING
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS
5/8" 8d CORROSION - RESISTANT SIDING
8d CORROSION - RESISTANT CASING
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

INTERIOR PANELING

41. 1/4" 4d CASING
4d FINISH
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

42. 3/8" 6d CASING
6d FINISH
6" EDGE
12" INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS

ELEMENT / CONNECTION FASTENER LOCATION

STUD TO TOP OR BOTTOM
PLATE

16. 4 - 8d COMMON
4 - 10d BOX
4 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
4 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
2 - 16d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

TOENAIL

END NAIL
2 - 16d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

17. TOP OR BOTTOM PLATE TO
STUD

END NAIL
2 - 16d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

18. TOP PLATES, LAPS AT CORNERS

AND INTERSECTIONS

FACE NAIL
2 - 8d COMMON
2 - 10d BOX
2 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
2 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
1" BRACE TO EACH STUD AND
PLATE

19. FACE NAIL
2 - 8d COMMON
2 - 10d BOX
1" x 6" SHEATHING TO EACH

BEARING

20. FACE NAIL
1" x 8" AND WIDER SHEATHING TO

EACH BEARING

21. 3 - 8d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX

FACE NAIL

JOIST TO SILL, TOP PLATE,

OR GIRDER

22. 3 - 8d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

TOENAIL

RIM JOIST, BAND JOIST, OR

BLOCKING TO TOP PLATE,

SILL OR OTHER FRAMING
BELOW
8d COMMON
10d BOX
3" x 0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

23. 6" O.C., TOE NAIL
2 - 8d COMMON
2 - 10d BOX

24. 1" x 6" SUBFLOOR OR LESS

TO EACH JOIST

FACE NAIL

25. 2" SUBFLOOR TO JOIST OR GIRDER 2 - 16d COMMON FACE NAIL

26. 2" PLANK 2 - 16d COMMON EACH BEARING, FACE NAIL
20d COMMON 32" O.C. FACE NAIL AT TOP AND BOTTOM

STAGGERED ON OPPOSITE SIDES
24" O.C. FACE NAIL AT TOP AND BOTTOM

STAGGERED ON OPPOSITE SIDES
10d BOX
3" x 0.131" NAILS
3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

27. BUILT UP GIRDERS AND BEAMS, 2"

LUMBER LAYERS

ENDS AND AT EACH SPLICE,

FACE NAIL
AND
2 - 20d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN
2 - 20d COMMON
3 - 10d BOX
3 - 3" x 0.131" NAILS
3 - 3" 14 GAGE STAPLES, 7/16" CROWN

LEDGER STRIP SUPPORTING

JOISTS OR RAFTERS

28. EACH JOIST OR RAFTER, FACE
NAIL

PLAN SECTION

PLAN SECTION

PLAN SECTION

PLAN SECTION

PLAN SECTION
8d @ 10"O.C.
16d @ SPACING TO

MATCH SHEAR PANEL

EDGE NAILING
E.N.

SHEAR PLY
2x OR 3x
POST
HOLDOWN AT 2x OR 3x
PLATE
E.N.

POST
E.N. W/ 2x OR 3x STUD

WHERE SHEAR PANEL
INSTALL INTER- OCCURS @ CROSS WALL

SECTING WALL

AFTER SHEAR PLY

IS INSTALLED

HOLDOWN

WHERE OCCURS
WALL &
POST
POST

HOLDOWN
E.N.

SHEAR PLY

SHEAR PLY
E.N.

HOLDOWN
WALL &
POST
POST
WALL &
POST

HOLDOWN
2x TRIMMER
E.N. SHEAR PLY
A
B E
C
E
16d @ SPACING TO

MATCH SHEAR PANEL

EDGE NAILING

SHEAR PLY
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.

As indicated
1/24/2024 10:41:34 AM
S2.0

DETAILS
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
JG
HSC
1/2" = 1'-0" 1

TYPICAL STUD WALL
1" = 1'-0" 2
TYP. SHEAR WALL DETAIL
12" = 1'-0" 4

MINIMUM NAILING SCHEDULE
3/4" = 1'-0" 3
PLAN SECTIONS @ WOOD
POSTS
No. Description Date

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
6149
2" L1 L2
(E) CONC.

SLAB
(N) CONC. SLAB
REINF. BAR DOWEL
@ 16" O.C. TYP. AT

LOCATION OF (N)

REBAR, SEE TABLE
FOR SIZE & EMBED.

BAR
SIZE
#4
#5
#6

DRILL BIT

DIAMETER
5/8"
3/4"
7/8"
L1
5"
5"
5"
DRILLED DOWEL NOTES:

1. SEE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION AND MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS.

2. WHERE THICKNESS OF EXISTING CONCRETE DOES NOT PERMIT SCHEDULED EMBEDMENT, SHORTEN EMBEDMENT TO MAINTAIN 2 IN. MINIMUM CONCRETE OVER AT END OF DOWEL.

3. USE SIMPSON S.E.T. EPOXY, W/ MIN. (3) DOWELS TO TIE (N) FTG. TO (E) FTG.

4. DO NOT CUT EXISTING REINF. WHEN DRILLING.

L2
2'-0"
2'-0"
2'-0"

SLAB ELEVATION
MIN.
2"
L1 L2
L2
(E) FTG.

FOOTING ELEVATION
A
A

SECTION A-A
EQ EQ
EQ EQ
EQ EQ

EQ EQ EQ
(N) FTG.
(E) FTG.

BEYOND

PROVIDE DOWEL

W/ EPOXY TO
MATCH

LOCATION OF
ALL NEW HORIZ.

REBARS TYP.
(N) FTG.
135.00°

90.00°
d
DD
2 1/2" MIN.
6d,
4" MIN.
6d,

STIRRUPS AND TIES
6 1

MAIN REINFORCEMENT
0"
12" MIN.
12d
D
d
D
MAX. SLOPE IF REQ'D.
24" MIN.
48d LAP,
4" MIN.
4d,
BAR
SIZE

BEND DIAMETER,
D
d = BAR DIAMETER
#3 TO #8
#9 TO #11
6d
8d
BAR
SIZE

BEND DIAMETER,
D
d = BAR DIAMETER
#3 TO #5
#6 TO #11
4d
8d
CLASS A & B BAR LAP SPLICE LENGTHS (IN.)
Ld = DEVELOPMENT LENGTH OF BAR

BAR SIZE
f'c = 2500 PSI f'c = 3000 PSI f'c = 4000 PSI
Ld A B Ld A B Ld A B
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
18 18 23 16 16 21 14 14 18
24 24 31 22 22 28 19 19 25
30 30 39 27 27 36 24 24 31
36 36 47 33 33 43 28 28 37
53 53 68 48 48 62 42 42 54
60 60 78 55 55 71 47 47 62
68 68 88 62 62 80 54 54 70
76 76 99 70 70 77 60 60 78
85 85 110 90 90 100 67 67 87
NOTES:

1. FOR SLAB BARS, BOTTOM BEAM BARS AND TEMPERATURE BARS IN SLABS, BEAMS OR FOOTINGS WITH SPACING MORE THAN 6" OR MORE, USE 0.8 TIMES THE LENGTH SHOWN, BUT NO LESS THAN 1' - 0".

2. FOR BARS WITH MORE THAN 1' - 0" OF CONCRETE CAST BELOW THE DEVElOPMENT LENGTH OR SPLICE, USE 1.3 TIMES THE LENGTHS SHOWN.

3. IF MORE THAN 50% OF THE BARS ARE SPLICED WITHIN THE SPLICE LENGTH, USE CLASS B LAP, OTHERWISE USE CLASS A LAP.

TOOLED JOINT AT

CONTINUOUS POUR W/
1/4" MAX. EDGE RADIUS
SAWCUT WITHIN 12

HOURS OF PLACING

CONCRETE
3/4"
T
9" 6"
2"
T

CONTROL JOINT
SLAB REINF. AND

UNDERLAYMENT

PER PLAN
T/4
1ST POUR 2ND POUR
SLAB REINF. AND

UNDERLAYMENT

PER PLAN
5/8"ø SMOOTH BARS,

APPLY BOND BREAKER

TO ONE SIDE & SPACE
TO MATCH TYP. REINF.

CONSTRUCTION JOINT

SLAB ON GRADE

CONCRETE BLOCK

CHAIRS (DOBIES),
AS REQ'D.

SLAB REINF. AND

UNDERLAYMENT

PER PLAN
#4 CONT.

TYP.
3" CLR.
8" TYP.

THICKENED EDGE,

THICKENED EDGE
SLAB REINFORCING:
#4 @ 16" O.C. EA.

WAY, TYP.
15 MIL VAPOR BARRIER
(MAY BE OMITTED AT

EXTERIOR SLABS)
5" THK.

TYP.
7" CLEAN

CRUSHED
ROCK
EXT.

GRADE

NEW SLAB ON GRADE

AND UNDERLAYMENT,

PER PLAN
(E) STUD WALL,

PER PLAN
18" WIDE FOOTING
12" MIN.
8" MIN.
8" MIN.
#4 DOWELS @ 16" O.C. W/

SIMPSON SET-XP EPOXY

INTO (E) FOOTING, PER
DETAIL 3/S2.1
(3) #4 BARS
#4 STIRRUPS
@ 16" O.C.
3" CLR.

TYP.
(E) FTG. EMBED.

MIN.
8"
(E) FTG. WIDTH
E.N.

SHEAR PLY, PER

PLAN AND SCHEDULE

SILL PLATE AND

ANCHOR BOLT,

PER PLAN

FINISH GRADE

SHEAR PLY, PER PLAN

AND SCHEDULE, MAY BE

APPLIED TO EITHER SIDE

OF STUDWALL
(E) SILL PLATE W/

ANCHOR BOLTS PER

PLAN AND SCHEDULE
(E) FTG.

HOLDOWN PER PLAN

AND SCHEDULE

PER PLAN
EMBED.

F1554 GR. 36

THREADED ROD W/

SIMPSON AT-XP

EPOXY, PER PLAN

SLAB ON GRADE PER
PLAN, SEE DETAIL E.N.

HOLDOWN POST,

PER PLAN
WIDTH 12" MIN.
(E) FTG., V.I.F.
12" MIN. V.I.F.
(E) FTG. EMBED.
2/S2.1

IF (E) DIMENSIONS ARE

VERIFIED TO BE

INADEQUATE, FOLLOW
DETAIL 5/S2.1 FOR

UNDERPINNING

SILL PLATE AND

ANCHOR BOLT

PER SCHEDULE
E.N.

SHEAR PLY.

PER PLAN

STUD WALL

PER PLAN

SLAB AND

UNDERLAYMENT,

PER PLAN AND
DETAIL 2/S2.1
(2) #4 CONT.
@ TOP & BOT.
#4 TIES @ 16" O.C.

PER PLAN
FTG. WIDTH,
MIN.
8"
FIN. GRADE
18" MIN.
1 1
TYP.
3" CLR.
2x4 BLOCK AT TOP
@ 32" O.C.

GABLE END TRUSS,

DESIGNED BY OTHERS

PLYWOOD AT GABLED ENDS

EDGE NAILING (OMIT
T.N. CLIP IF PLYWOOD
CONTINUES TO BOTT.

CHORD) E.N.

PLYWOOD, PER PLAN
A35 CLIP
@ 24" O.C.
2x6 DIAGONAL BRACE
SPACED @ 48" O.C.,

ATTACHED TO VERTICAL
STUD WALL, PER PLAN AND BLOCKING (4)-10d
ROOF TRUSS @
24" O.C.,

DESIGNED BY
OTHERS

PROVIDE GABLE END
TRUSS BLKG. AS REQ'D
2x OUTLOOKERS
@ 4'-0" O.C.

CS16 STRAP @ EA.

OUTLOOKER
FASCIA, S.A.D.

E.N.
2x SHAPED BLOCKING

ROOF TRUSS PER PLAN,

DESIGNED BY OTHERS
E.N.

FRAMING CLIP PER

SHEAR SCHEDULE
ROOF PLY. PER
PLAN
E.N.

PLYWOOD, PER PLAN

STUD WALL, PER PLAN

FASCIA,
S.A.D. SIMPSON H2.5A TIE
@ EA. TRUSS

DO NOT NOTCH TRUSSES,
PROVIDE 2x SHIM, AS

NECESSARY FOR FULL

BEARING
S.A.D.

OVERHANG
E.N.

Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.
1" = 1'-0"
1/24/2024 10:41:34 AM
S2.1

DETAILS
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
DA
JG
1" = 1'-0" 3

TYPICAL DOWEL CONNECTION
1" = 1'-0" 1
TYP. REINF. BAR BENDS AND

LAP SPLICE SCHEDULE
1" = 1'-0" 2
TYP. SLAB ON GRADE DETAILS
5 UNDERPIN FOOTING RETROFIT
DETAIL
6 HOLDOWN TO EXISTING FTG. -

SLAB ON GRADE
4 TYP. SLAB ON GRADE

FOOTING - NO CURB
7 GABLE END ROOF TRUSS
DETAIL
8 TYP. ROOF TRUSSES PERP.

TO EXT. WALL
No. Description Date
1 PLAN REVISION 01/24/2024

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
6250
FLUSH BM.,

PER PLAN

STUDWALL,

PER PLAN

POST, EMBEDDED IN

STUDWALL, WIDTH TO

MATCH BEAM ABOVE,

DEPTH TO MATCH

STUDWALL
(2) A34 FRAMING
CLIPS, MIN.

SIMPSON H2.5A

HURRICANE TIE,
EA. SIDE OF BEAM
(2) A34 FRAMING
CLIPS, MIN.

SILL PLATE
DOUBLE

TOP PLATE

ALIGN POST W/

BEAM ABOVE

TYPICAL STUDWALL CONDITION
FLUSH BM.,

PER PLAN

STUDWALL,

PER PLAN

POST, EMBEDDED IN

STUDWALL, WIDTH TO

MATCH BEAM ABOVE,

DEPTH TO MATCH

STUDWALL
(2) A34 FRAMING
CLIPS, MIN.

SIMPSON H2.5A

HURRICANE TIE
(2) A34 FRAMING
SILL PLATE CLIPS, MIN.

DOUBLE

TOP PLATE

ALIGN POST W/

BEAM ABOVE

CORNER CONDITION
SIMPSON LTP4

FRAMING CLIP
FLUSH BM.,

PER PLAN

STUDWALL,

PER PLAN

POST, EMBEDDED IN

STUDWALL, WIDTH TO

MATCH BEAM ABOVE,

DEPTH TO MATCH

STUDWALL
A34 FRAMING
SIMPSON LTP4

FRAMING CLIP
(2) A34 FRAMING
SILL PLATE CLIPS, MIN.

DOUBLE

TOP PLATE ALIGN POST W/

BEAM ABOVE

ENDWALL CONDITION
SIMPSON LTP4

FRAMING CLIP
FLUSH BM.,

PER PLAN

STUDWALL,

PER PLAN

POST, EMBEDDED IN

STUDWALL, WIDTH TO

MATCH BEAM ABOVE,

DEPTH TO MATCH

STUDWALL

SIMPSON ECCQ
COL. CAP, PER
PLAN
SIMPSON MST37

STRAP ACROSS

DISCONTINUOUS

TOP PLATE
(2) A34 FRAMING
CLIPS, MIN.

SILL PLATE
DOUBLE

TOP PLATE

ALIGN POST W/

BEAM ABOVE
"POST W/ CC"

COLUMN CAP CONDITION
MIN.

W
W
W/3 MAX. @ ALL WALLS
W/2 MAX IF DBL. FULL
HT. STUDS (LIMITED TO
2 CONSECUTIVE
STUDS)
W = WIDTH OF STUD OR PLATE
d = DEPTH OF JOIST
L = CLEAR SPAN BETWEEN SUPPORTS

NO HOLES OR NOTCHES PERMITTED
WHERE d IS LESS THAN 5 1/2" DEEP.

NOTCHES NOT PERMITTED IN BEARING
WALL STUDS.

NOTCHES NOT PERMITTED IN MIDDLE
L/3 OF SPAN LENGTH

CLEAR SPACING

BETWEEN HOLES

SHALL NOT BE
LESS THAN 4' - 0"
MIN.
3/4" CLR.
4" MAX. @ NON-BEARING

WALLS ONLY
d/2 d/2
d
MAX.
d/4
L/3 MIN. 4d MIN.

MAX.
d/3
MAX.
d/6
2" MIN.
2" MIN.
2" MIN.

STRAP AND SPLICE

TOP PLATE SPLICE

PLATE JOINTS TO

BE OVER STUDS
8-16d EA. SIDE OF
SPLICE
ST6224 STRAP

ON TOP OR SIDE
DBL. TOP PLATE EQ EQ

HOLE SIZE STRAPS
LESS THAN 1/3

PLATE WIDTH

NOT REQ'D
LESS THAN 2/3

PLATE WIDTH
ST2122 W/ 4
16d EA. END
OVER 2/3

PLATE WIDTH
ST2125 W/ 6
16d EA. END

OF PIPE & STRAP

TOP PLATE SPLICE AT PIPE
STRAP EA. SIDE

PER TABLE
DBL.

TOP PLATE
Scale
Project number
Date
Drawn by
Checked by
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail
Consultant
Address
Address
Phone
Fax
e-mail

APPROVAL STAMP

THESE PLANS ARE THE PROPERTY OF HC STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE EXPRESS USE ON THIS
PROJECT. ANY REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS

DRAWINGS OR ANY OF ITS DETAILS WITHOUT WRITTEN
CONSENT OF HC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INC. IS A

VIOLATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW AND THE VIOLATOR MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION IN A COURT OF LAW.
1" = 1'-0"
1/24/2024 10:41:35 AM
S2.2

DETAILS
2023-040
1174 LAUREL AVE, EAST PALO ALTO, CA,
94303

LAUREL AVE ADU
08-18-2023
DA
HSC
1" = 1'-0" 1
BEAM TO POST CONNECTION, TYP.
1" = 1'-0" 3

SAWN LUMBER HOLES &
NOTCH REQ.
1" = 1'-0" 2

TOP PLATE SPLICE
No. Description Date

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE

FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE

CALIFORNIA BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL,

ELECTRICAL, AND ENERGY CODES AS AMENDED
BY THE JURISDICTION.

PLAN REVIEW ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS

DOES NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION TO

PROCEED IN VIOLATION OF ANY FEDERAL,
STATE, NOR LOCAL REGULATION.

BY: ___________________ DATE: _________________ WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS, INC. (WC3 )
Yanxian Chen
01/24/2024
6351
6452
6553
6654
6755
6856
6957
7058
5971
6072
7361
6274
6375
7664
6577
7866
7967
8068
8169
8270
8371
8472
8573
8674
8775
8876
8977
9078
9179
9280
9381
9482
9583
9684
9785
9886
9987
10088
10189
10290
10391
10492
10593
10694
10795
10896
10997
11098
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.1

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: James Colin, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointments
Recommendation
Interview applicants for the Planning Commission; and appoint applicants for Regular or Alternate Seats.

Alignment with City Council Strategic Plan
This recommendation is primarily aligned with:

Priority No. 1: Promote Housing, Economic and Workforce Development Priority No. 3: Promote Health & Public Safety
Priority No. 4: Ensure Our Financial and Organizational Health Background
The City Council of the City of East Palo Alto is seeking candidates to make the following appointments:

Planning Commission appointments for the following terms:

Regular Seat No. 3: From July 8, 2025, through May 31, 2028 Regular Seat No. 4: From July 8, 2025, through May 31, 2028 Alternate Seat No. 1: From May 31, 2025, through May 31, 2026 The application period remained open through June 3, 2025. Applications were accepted 99 POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.1
electronically via the SurveyMonkey platform. Outreach was conducted through the City’s social media platforms, various newsletters sent to over 4,000 residents, targeted Facebook advertisements, and the City’s website.

At the May 20, 2025, City Council meeting, the Council interviewed the following applicants:
- Christopher Kao
- Elena Savva
- Elena Kogan
- DeVan Taylor
- Maria Rocha
- Elizabeth Pulido
- Gail Dixon
However, the Council did not make any appointments at that time due to an error in communication, which resulted in some applicants not receiving timely notice to attend the meeting. In order to ensure fairness and uphold the integrity of the selection process, the Council decided to interview the rest of the applicants at the June 3, 2025, meeting so that all eligible applicants would have an equal opportunity to participate.

The City Clerk has notified all applicants who were not interviewed on May 20 that they will have the opportunity to be interviewed on June 3, 2025.

To further support inclusiveness and participation, the City is continuing to accept applications through June 3, 2025. Any new applications received before that date will be included in the interview process.

Selection Process
In order to ensure an efficient and transparent Brown Act compliant selection process, the procedure for review is as follows:

1. City Council will review the applications attached to the June 3, 2025, agenda.

2. City Council will be provided with a voting form at the beginning of the agenda item from the City Clerk.

3. City Council will conduct interviews.

4. City Council will make its selections by motion.

Attachments

1. Planning Commission Applications
100
Planning Commission Application 2025
1 / 19
Q1
Name
Christopher Kao
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#1

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Tuesday, April 08, 2025 5:36:05 PM y A
Last Modified: Mo Tuesday, April 08, 2025 5:42:29 PM u d y A 8 9 P Time Spent: S 00:06:233
IP Address: P

101
Planning Commission Application 2025
2 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? I would like to serve on the Planning Commission because I care deeply about East Palo Alto’s future and have already been actively involved in shaping it. As the chair of the Public Works and Transportation Commission, I’ve worked collaboratively to research infrastructure funding, improve ADA accessibility, and enhance pedestrian safety through efforts like the temporary traffic circles on Pulgas and Fordham. My engagement with the Ravenswood Business District Specific Plan update reflects my long-term commitment to thoughtful development: I proactively shared transportation data with the city’s consultants, such as SamTrans’ plans for Bus Rapid Transit and the launch of the EPX route, to help ensure our transit models reflect both present and future needs. I want to bring this same energy and follow-through to the Planning Commission, especially now that the specific plan is entering a phase where implementation decisions will have a lasting impact on the community.

My vision for East Palo Alto is a walkable, mixed-use, multimodal city that meets the aspirations of current residents and future generations. I believe the next evolution of the Planning Commission must include voices that understand both the need for inclusive growth and the importance of preventing displacement. I’m part of a generation that sees thriving, connected places like Cityline in downtown Sunnyvale or Huxley in Redwood City and wants to see something similar—yet rooted in EPA’s values—emerge here. I know that the Ravenswood and Four Corners area, located within 0.5 miles of a major transit stop, is a unique opportunity zone for equitable development. With three years of commission experience, a record of community-oriented action, and a commitment to collaboration, I hope to bring a balanced, thoughtful perspective to the Planning Commission that reflects the city’s diversity and longterm interests. 102
Planning Commission Application 2025
3 / 19
Q1
Name
Tonga Victoria
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#2

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: W y A A Wednesday, April 23, 2025 10:12:33 AM
Last Modified: Mo W d d y A 3 8 A Wednesday, April 23, 2025 10:18:55 AM Time Spent: S 00:06:21
IP Address: P

103
Planning Commission Application 2025
4 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? I would like to serve on the Planning Commission because I believe equitable development is the cornerstone of a just and thriving city. As someone who was born and raised in East Palo Alto, and who has spent over a decade working at the intersection of housing, policy, and community voice, I understand how planning decisions today will define the future of our neighborhoods for generations.

As a current Public Works & Transportation Commissioner, I’ve already helped shape infrastructure conversations around mobility, youth access, and environmental resilience. I see the Planning Commission as a next step to ensure our general plan, zoning, and development projects uphold principles of racial and economic justice, sustainability, and long-term community benefit.

My approach is rooted in transparency, inclusion, and proactive collaboration. I want to help ensure that as our city grows, it grows with intention—preserving the cultural integrity of East Palo Alto while creating real pathways to affordability, ownership, and opportunity for all.
104
Planning Commission Application 2025
5 / 19
Q1
Name
Elena Savva
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#3

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Thursday, April 24, 2025 4:34:50 AM y A A
Last Modified: Mo Thursday, April 24, 2025 5:11:56 AM u d y A A Time Spent: S 00:37:06 3
IP Address: P

105
Planning Commission Application 2025
6 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? Serving on the Planning Commission isn't just a civic duty for me a chance to actively shape the future of our town. I want to be a thoughtful voice, advocating for growth that respects and enhances the very fabric of our neighborhoods and the natural beauty that surrounds us. Beyond connection to our community, I also feel a strong sense of responsibility to participate actively in our local governance. I genuinely believe that each of us has a role to play in shaping our future. I understand that the decisions made by the Planning Commission have long-lasting ripples, and I'm prepared to dedicate the necessary time and energy to delve into each proposal, understand the nuances of our regulations, and make well-informed choices that genuinely serve the best interests of our entire community. I have architect degree. My years of training and professional experience have given me an understanding of how spaces work, the principles that guide good design, the practicalities of building codes, and the real-world implications of planning policies. I believe this allows me to offer meaningful perspectives on the feasibility and overall quality of development projects and I genuinely believe my expertise can be an asset in shaping a brighter future for our community. 106
Planning Commission Application 2025
7 / 19
Q1
Name
Elena Kogan
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#4

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Friday, April 25, 2025 10:04:55 AM y A A
Last Modified: Mo F d y A A Friday, April 25, 2025 10:06:51 AM Time Spent: S 00:01:56
IP Address: P

107
Planning Commission Application 2025
8 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? Because I am passionate about the city where I and my family have lived for 25 years. I want to see it improve and thrive. 108
Planning Commission Application 2025
9 / 19
Q1
Name
Michael Mashack
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Respondent skipped this question
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#5

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Friday, May 02, 2025 6:47:43 AM y y A
Last Modified: Mo F d y y A Friday, May 02, 2025 7:15:27 AM Time Spent: S 00:27:44
IP Address: P

109
Planning Commission Application 2025
10 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? Having grown up in the Gardens neighborhood where I raised my children, coached youth sports, maintain an active leadership role as a YMCA Board Member, and have served on various City Boards, Committees, and Commissions, I understand the hopes and concerns of our East Palo Alto families, seniors, and small businesses. Witnessing firsthand and in real-time, East Palo Alto’s rapid growth and the pressures of displacement, I want to help ensure that new development reflects and uplifts the needs of all East Palo Alto residents.

I’m eager to continue serving on the East Palo Alto Planning Commission, where I’ve proudly led the commission as the Chair of the Commission for the past two years. During my tenure, I’ve helped guide complex, community centered land use decisions such as the RBD Specific Plan and Housing Element Compliance, affordable housing policy to open space planning, and I remain committed to ensuring our rapid growth benefits all residents.

I want East Palo Alto to be a model of thoughtful urban growth: one that balances new economic opportunity with social equity, green infrastructure with neighborhood scale, and pedestrian safety with regional connectivity. By serving on the Planning Commission, I will continue to work to integrate innovative sustainability standards, strengthen zoning protections for small scale entrepreneurs, and expand community outreach so that every resident, regardless of background or income, can participate meaningfully in shaping our city’s future.

Thank you for considering my application. I’m committed to continuing the investment of my time, energy, and local knowledge to help guide East Palo Alto’s next chapter of growth in a way that honors its past and empowers its people. 110
Planning Commission Application 2025
11 / 19
Q1
Name
DeVan Taylor
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
Respondent skipped this question
Q4
E-mail Address
Respondent skipped this question
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#6

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Tuesday, May 06, 2025 6:13:23 PM y y
Last Modified: Mo Tuesday, May 06, 2025 6:30:18 PM u d y y 3 8 P Time Spent: S 00:16:54
IP Address: P

111
Planning Commission Application 2025
12 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? I would like to serve on the Planning Commission because I care deeply about preserving and uplifting the values, voices, and vision of East Palo Alto residents. Our city has a rich history of cultural diversity, community activism, and resilience in the face of displacement and inequity. I want to help ensure that future development reflects that legacy and is shaped with strong local input.

With a background in public administration, policy development, and community engagement, I bring the tools to support planning decisions that prioritize affordability, environmental sustainability, and inclusive growth. I believe planning is not just about buildings and zoning — it’s about creating a city where families can stay rooted, where elders can age with dignity, and where future generations feel a sense of belonging. My goal is to support development that includes local voices, celebrates our cultural heritage, and ensures that East Palo Alto’s residents remain at the center of its future. 112
Planning Commission Application 2025
13 / 19
Q1
Name
Maria Rocha
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto,CA 94303
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#7

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Thursday, May 08, 2025 2:32:26 PM y y
Last Modified: Mo Thursday, May 08, 2025 2:36:32 PM u d y y 8 3 3 P Time Spent: S 00:04:06
IP Address: P

113
Planning Commission Application 2025
14 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? I would like to serve on the Planning Commission because East Palo Alto is not just where I live—it’s where I was raised, where I taught, and where I’ve chosen to raise my own family. As a second-generation resident with deep community ties, I have seen our city grow through both challenges and triumphs. My lived experiences—as a student, educator, mother, and public servant—have given me a unique understanding of our community’s needs, especially around responsible development, housing, and infrastructure.

I believe thoughtful planning should center the voices of long-standing residents, prioritize equity, and preserve the rich cultural and historical fabric of East Palo Alto. With my professional background in project management, policy writing, and access control at Stanford, I bring skills in collaboration, safety, and sustainability that I believe can support the city’s growth in a balanced and community-driven way. This is my opportunity to give back in a tangible way to the city that has shaped me. 114
Planning Commission Application 2025
15 / 19
Q1
Name
Robert Allen Fisk
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Q4
E-mail Address
Respondent skipped this question
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#8

COMPLETE
Co o Collector: W Web Link 1 (W ) Web Link)
Started: Thursday, May 08, 2025 5:12:36 PM y y
Last Modified: Mo Thursday, May 08, 2025 5:31:02 PM u d y y 8 3 P Time Spent: S 00:18:26 8
IP Address: P

115
Planning Commission Application 2025
16 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? I am a senior member of the commission having served for the last decade. I am knowledgeable of developments in the city, past, present and future (yet to be built). At my urging and participation, I am responsible for the city adopting the Condo Conversion Ordinance (limitations) and the Ellis Act Mitigations (financial and tenant protections). In addition, I have served as Treasurer for the last 4 city propositions (JJ, V, L, HH) and was responsible for tracking income and expenses and filing 410s, 460s and other required FPPC documents with the city clerk.

Here is additional information that you may want to review that I provided in previous appointment applications. =====
What is your understanding of the purpose of this Advisory body? Since the commission reviews all development proposals requiring a use permit, architectural control, variance, minor subdivision and environmental review associated with these projects, I see clearly that the Commission serves as one of the recommending bodies to the City Council for major subdivision, rezoning, conditional use permits and planned unit development permits. All developers need to be treated fairly and equitably as do our citizens by requiring quality construction and planning that serves all our citizen needs including maximizing community benefits.

Please describe briefly why you want to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee you choose, and what you hope to accomplish as a member:

Preserve affordable housing, add additional affordable housing (BMRs), and prevent resident displacement.

Please list 3 issues facing the City that you feel the Advisory Body should address:
(1)Traffic and (2) parking impacts in upcoming projects should not be considered separately but altogether. Three projects will affect the University Avenue corridor: two at Woodland Ave, one at Donohoe, and one at Bay Road.

Plus we need to leverage all projects to provide the (3) maximum community benefits.

EDUCATIONAL & OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND:

Education: B.S., Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst M.A., Biology, University of California, Berkeley (candidate) NeuroBiology, NeuroChemistry, coursework (Stanford University) A+ Certification, CompTIA, Networking Essentials, Cisco/Sun Academy Unix System Administration Certificates. OICW, Menlo Park Occupation:___Retired_____________________________________________ Prior work experience includes:

Systems Engineer, Information Technology, Sun Microsystems, and Tandy Corporation; Research Associate (Biotechnology) at Syntex Corporation & Syntex Research; Neurology Research, Veteran’s Administration Hospital and Stanford University; Electron Microscopy, UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco; Property Manager, J&R Associates, East Palo Alto
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Do you/ did you belong to any other Civic affiliations? Did you participate in any community activities? Please list them and share your experiences:

Planning Commissioner:
116
Planning Commission Application 2025
17 / 19
PC Sub-Committee on Subdivisions, Chair; PC Sub-Committee on Condominium Conversion; PC Liaison to Westside Area Plan Advisory Committee
Rent Stabilization Board Member (Chair, 2005):

RSB Sub-Committees: (1) Rules & Regulations; (2) Operational Excellence RSB Ad-hoc Committee on Condominium Conversion; Joint PC/RSB Condo Conversion Syntex Corporation, Veterinary Explorer Post Leader 1977-78 Syntex Research, Safety Committee (Radioactive, Bio-hazardous, & other Toxic Wastes) Filoli Gardens and Nature Preserve (1 square mile) and a National Trust Site for Historic Preservation in Woodside Nature Education Docent and House & Garden Docent; School Day Hikes (2 miles) for students (grades 1-5) I attended all the Westside Area Plan Advisory Committee and GPAC meetings as well as other General Plan community meetings at the YMCA and the RSB and the consultant led city hall workshops. Attended YUCA and Woodland Park community meetings.

Measure HH +V campaigns: accounting, website maintenance, and outreach efforts in 2018 &2020 and other campaigns notably the NO on E(victions) and JOP campaigns in the past.
117
Planning Commission Application 2025
18 / 19
Q1
Name
Andre Guzman
Q2
Home Address
Q3
City
East Palo Alto
Q4
E-mail Address
Q5
Phone Number
Q6
Are you available to attend regular Commission meetings scheduled for the second and fourth Monday's of every
month at 7:00 pm?
Yes
#9

COMPLETE
Collector: o o W Web Link 1 (W Web Link)
SStarted: F d y y 9 3 A Friday, May 09, 2025 1:13:02 AM Last Modified: Mo F d y y 9 A Friday, May 09, 2025 1:15:56 AM Time Spent: 00:02:53
IP Address: P A

118
Planning Commission Application 2025
19 / 19
Q7
Why would you like to serve on the Planning Commission? To continue to grow roots deep in the community and develop a better east palo alto. My grandfather was on a few of the first commission boards prior to the city being incorporated. East Palo Alto has been home to us for decades. 119
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2

EAST PALO ALTO

CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
VIA: Melvin E. Gaines, City Manager
BY: Orly Amey, Assistant to the City Manager
Shiri Klima, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: FY2025–2029 Strategic Priorities Framework and FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan Recommendation

1. Receive results from the second round of community engagement, including the Council project prioritization process and community survey data;

2. Affirm the FY2025-2029 Strategic Priorities;

3. Provide direction on carryforward and new projects in the FY2025-2027 Work Plan;

4. Direct staff to finalize the Work Plan for formal adoption at the June 17, 2025, City Council meeting; and

5. Direct staff to include necessary appropriations for Work Plan projects in the proposed budget to be adopted at the June 17, 2025, City Council Meeting.

Alignment with City Council Strategic Plan
This recommendation is primarily aligned with:

Priority: Promote Housing, Economic and Workforce Development Priority: Implement the Comprehensive Transportation and Mobility Plan Priority: Promote Health & Public Safety
Priority: Ensure Our Financial and Organizational Health Priority: Improve the City's Water Infrastructure
Priority: Develop and Implement a Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan Priority: Enhance Community Services and Parks for Residents Executive Summary
120
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
The City of East Palo Alto is nearing completion of a strategic planning process to establish the FY2025–2029 Strategic Priorities and FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan. This staff report outlines the process undertaken to develop the framework, summarizes the community input that shaped it, and presents the recommended priorities and possible project selections for Council adoption. Following extensive engagement and project scoping, a total of 111 projects were reviewed by Council, who provided direction on which to advance for feasibility analysis.

Staff now return with a final recommendation for adoption of a four-year Strategic Priorities framework and a focused two-year Work Plan consisting of 22 new and 37 carryforward projects that align with City needs, organizational capacity, and Council direction.

Background
The City has undertaken a comprehensive strategic planning process to define a set of fouryear Strategic Priorities and a two-year Work Plan. This initiative was launched in Fall 2024 following Council’s direction to develop a four-year Strategic Priorities framework, complemented by a focused two-year Work Plan.

This process began with project scoping and consultant onboarding in Fall 2024. The City retained Raimi + Associates (R+A) to guide the development of the strategic planning framework and facilitate community and Council engagement. Internal alignment efforts were conducted through a cross-departmental working group to ensure feasibility and coordination across City departments.

Community engagement has been central to the priority-setting and work plan development process. Between February and March 2025, staff and consultants conducted a broad-based community engagement process. This included key leader interviews with institutional partners, multiple stakeholder focus groups, and a citywide community workshop held on March 8, 2025. That same day, Council held a Goal-Setting Retreat to reflect on input and begin shaping preliminary priority areas.

By April 2025, staff and R+A synthesized the information collected through this process into a preliminary list of 13 strategic themes, which were further refined into 7 proposed priority areas. City departments were then asked to submit project proposals aligned with these priorities, including both new initiatives and recommended carryforward projects from the FY2024–2025 Work Plan.

On April 22, 2025, the City Council held a Study Session to review the full draft project inventory. Council reviewed a total of 111 projects—61 in-progress projects from the FY2023– 2025 Work Plan and 50 new project proposals developed through community engagement and departmental scoping. Staff presented the prioritization framework and advised that 23 of the FY2023–2025 Work Plan projects were either expected to become operational or to be completed by June 30, 2025. The 38 projects projected to continue into FY2025-2026 were presented as potential carryforward projects to be included in the FY2025–2027 Work Plan.

The City Council affirmed that the 38 projects should carry forward – 37 of them have been 121
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
included FY2025-2027 Work Plan, with the exception of the grant-funded carryforward project Activate City Parks with Health and Safety Programming. Upon further review, staff determined that it is not feasible to proceed with the project given that the grant has concluded, so staff has removed it from the projects list. Council also directed staff to further evaluate a list of potential new projects for inclusion based on staffing and funding capacity. This June 3, 2025, agenda report includes staff evaluation of new projects and includes a recommended four-year strategic priorities framework and two-year work plan.

Analysis
Insights from Second Round of Community Engagement
After the April 22 Study Session, the City launched a second round of community engagement to validate the draft Strategic Priorities and inform final project selection for the FY2025–2027 Work Plan. This round included an online survey, two public workshops, and pop-up outreach events across the community.

The City hosted an in-person workshop at the YMCA on May 7 and a virtual workshop on May

12. Each workshop included a presentation on the strategic planning process, small group discussions, and opportunities for participants to reflect on the proposed priorities and projects.

In addition, City staff conducted pop-up outreach at the Bloomhouse Farmers Market and the Cinco de Mayo celebration at Bell Street Park. These events helped reach a broad crosssection of residents who may not have been able to attend the formal workshops.

The community survey—available online in English and Spanish—received over 175 responses. Residents were asked to reflect on the Strategic Priorities, rank up to 10 projects from the total list of new projects, suggest missing projects, and offer open-ended feedback.

Across workshops and survey feedback, several themes consistently emerged, including infrastructure and neighborhood safety, housing stability, emergency preparedness, youth and senior services, and calls for greater transparency and communication.

Overall, community input reinforced strong alignment with the proposed Strategic Priorities and helped shape the recommended Work Plan. Residents voiced broad support for the City’s direction while identifying areas where staff could refine or expand efforts. A full summary of findings is provided in Attachment A.

Proposed Strategic Priorities Framework
The final Strategic Priorities framework reflects the synthesis of community input and Council direction. It outlines seven priority areas for the City of East Palo Alto for the next four years:

1. Civic Engagement: Provide diverse and inclusive opportunities for all EPA community members to participate in City meetings, have a voice in City affairs, and develop leadership skills for EPA youth.
122
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2

2. Governance, Organizational Strength, and Fiscal Sustainability: Strengthen the City’s internal capacity, transparency, and long-term financial health by improving core operation, investing in workforce and systems, and implementing data-informed strategies to ensure effective service delivery, accountability, and fiscal resilience.

3. Comprehensive Housing: Increase the City’s housing stock at all income levels (from affordable to market rate), facilitate pathways to homeownership, and guard against the displacement of existing residents.

4. Land Use, Economic, and Workforce Development: Support balanced development that attracts investment, strengthens local businesses, and expands access to quality jobs and services that meet local needs.

5. Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities: Invest in the modernization and expansion of the City’s parks, recreation, and community facilities and services to increase residents’ access to open spaces and recreational opportunities.

6. Public Health, Safety, and Quality of Life: Implement and enforce strategies to ensure public safety, improve the livability of neighborhoods, and prepare the City for disasters and emergencies.

7. Public Infrastructure and Utilities: Maintain, modernize, and expand the City’s physical infrastructure (streets, sidewalks, utilities) to support existing homes and businesses, and new development.

The survey listed these proposed Strategic Priorities and asked: “To what extent do these Strategic Priorities align with the main issues that the City should address to improve the East Palo Alto community?” 78% of the respondents stated that they either agree or strongly agree with these priorities.

Proposed FY2025-2027 Work Plan
Prior to conducting a project feasibility review, staff made administrative adjustments to the proposed new project list. As a result of these adjustments, the number of new proposed projects reduced from 27 to 23. Changes included:
 The proposed projects “Launch Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program” and “Launch Foreclosure Prevention Fund Program” were merged into a single initiative.
 A new youth civic engagement project was combined with a carryforward project focused on creating a youth commission. This effort is now reflected as a carryforward project titled “Develop Recommendations for Establishing a Youth Commission or Alternative Youth Civic Engagement Program.”
 The project “Design and Construct Road Improvements on Woodland Avenue from 123
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
University Avenue to Newell Road” was mistakenly identified as new during the April 22 Study Session; it is actually a carryforward project.
 The projects “Implement Quick-win Projects from the Parks Master Plan” and “Implement Parks Lighting and Safety Improvement Program” were merged into a single project: “Implement Priority Projects from the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan.”
Following these adjustments, staff conducted an in-depth feasibility assessment of the 23 remaining projects. This included analysis of alignment with the seven Strategic Priorities, departmental workload and capacity to manage additional projects, budget availability (including one-time and ongoing costs), and logical phasing and sequencing over the FY2025– 2027 cycle. In particular, there were some key considerations, which include:
 Departmental capacity is limited. Many departments are already managing high workloads. Without consultant support or additional staff, they cannot take on more complex projects. As a result, projects are phased across two years to avoid overextension.
 Funding considerations are critical. One-time costs have been incorporated into the FY 2025–2026 proposed budget where feasible. The City Council may choose to allocate unassigned General Fund reserves but must recognize these funds are limited and are not ongoing.
 Ongoing fiscal impacts are avoided. Staff suggests caution in adding recurring General Fund commitments—such as new full-time positions—given the City’s structural deficit.

Each proposed project was evaluated for readiness and includes a description, lead department, cost estimates, staffing impacts, and implementation timeline. Based on this process, staff reviewed 61 projects for the FY2025–2027 Work Plan—37 carryforward projects from the FY24-25 Work Plan, and 23 new projects.

See Attachment B for a detailed evaluation matrix of all proposed projects.

Distribution of Projects by Lead Division
To better understand workload distribution, staff analyzed the number of projects led by each division, including carryforward and new initiatives:
 Public Works – Engineering leads the most projects: 19 total (17 carryforward, 2 new).  City Manager’s Office divisions (Main, Community Services, Information Technology, and Human Resources) collectively lead 20 projects, including 5 new initiatives focused on modernization, civic engagement, and equity.
 Other departments, such as Housing (CEDD) and Finance, are also leading multiple 124
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
new and resource-intensive projects, many of which require phased implementation or consultant support.

Because staff expertise is in many cases specialized, reallocating personnel between divisions (e.g., from the City Manager’s Office to Engineering) is not feasible. This analysis underscores the need for phased implementation, cross-departmental coordination, and strategic staff augmentation to deliver a realistic and achievable Work Plan.

Projects NOT Recommended for the FY2025-2027 Work Plan
All 23 new project proposals were assessed for alignment with Strategic Priorities, fiscal impact, staffing capacity, and implementation feasibility. Although some projects are supported by community or Council interest, four are not recommended at this time due to feasibility challenges. Three of these have alternative, modified versions included in the Work Plan for further research or scoping. The fourth is not recommended because it has already been addressed through prior planning. These projects may be reconsidered in future cycles if staffing or funding conditions improve.

1. Priority: Comprehensive Housing
 Launch Residential Rental Inspection Program (CEDD – Building) The proposed program would enhance tenant protections and improve housing quality by establishing regular inspection standards and enforcement protocols to ensure residential rental properties comply with health and safety codes. Before the program can be launched, several steps are required: researching existing rental inspection programs, developing a program framework and guidelines, conducting legal review, drafting an ordinance, and obtaining City Council approval along with necessary resource allocation.

Due to current staffing and workload limitations, staff does not believe the program can be implemented within the next two fiscal years. Instead, staff offers an alternative project to study and begin drafting guidelines for a potential Residential Rental Inspection Program in East Palo Alto. This research-focused project is included in the possible project list below.
 Launch a Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program (CEDD – Housing)
This project proposes to launch and operate a local foreclosure prevention fund to support financial stability among residents. However, due to its high workload impact (4 of 5) and significant implementation needs, including a feasibility study, staffing, and funding, staff does not believe the program can be implemented within the next two fiscal years. Instead, staff offers an alternative project to research the feasibility of the program. This researchfocused project is included in the possible project list below. 125
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
 Implement a First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (CEDD – Housing) The proposed program would develop a down payment assistance program for eligible first-time homebuyers. Staff proposes to further study a potential program and to receive further City Council input prior to committing to launching such a program. Therefore, this project is recommended against; however, a project to research the feasibility of a firsttime homebuyer assistance program is included as a possible project.

2. Priority: Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities  Study the Creation of a Parks and Recreation Department (CMO - Admin) This project would evaluate the feasibility of creating a standalone Parks and Recreation Department, replacing the current structure in which recreation programs are managed by the Community Services Division of the City Manager’s Office. While the project has a moderate workload (3 of 5), a recent comprehensive effort already addressed this topic.

In April 2023, the City Council adopted the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan, a two-year effort that included robust community engagement and organizational analysis. The plan, which cost $370,000 to complete, already offers recommendations for future staffing and a department structure. Given this recent, in-depth planning work and the current lack of ongoing funds to support a new department, staff does not recommend inclusion of this project at this time.

Thus, 22 new projects remain in the FY 2025-2027 Work Plan (with 59 total projects).

Potential Projects for the FY2025-2027 Work Plan
This section outlines the 22 new projects that staff recommends including in the FY2025–2027 Work Plan, based on the Council’s prioritization exercise, community input and feasibility assessments. According to the latest community outreach, the most desired new projects are (in order of popularity):

1. Develop Citywide Sewer Master Plan

2. Expand Parking Enforcement Capacity

3. Install Citywide Lighting Improvements – Phase 2

4. Launch Emergency Preparedness Program

5. Develop a 10-Year Fiscal Strategy and Structural Deficit Plan

6. Launch Home Repair Program

7. Research the Feasibility of a First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program

8. Fund Community Services for YMCA

9. Plan for Development of New Civic Center Facility

10.Implement Quick-Win Projects from the Parks Master Plan Costs of Recommended Projects
126
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
While staff can potentially accomplish the remaining projects, collectively, it is important for Council to be aware of the costs. In FY2025-26, the impact is $3,605,610 from the General Fund:
$1,639,610 for the new projects and $1,966,000 for the continuing projects. (Most of the carryforward projects costs are already budgeted, but there’s likely $580 thousand that could be requested in FY25-26, depending on policy direction predominantly related to the permit parking program.) This does not include the FY2026-27 impact for projects that must continue into that year or will only begin in that year, and it also does not include projects staff recommended against.

If all projects (both new and carryforward) are adopted, the FY 2025-2026 projected General Fund deficit will increase by $1.34 million to $3.43 million. There are also impacts to other funds, such as the Water Fund and IT Projects Fund. Additionally, many of these projects have ongoing fiscal impacts due to recurring software licensing costs, ongoing programs, or maintenance: that impact is estimated at $800 thousand annually (of which approximately $600 thousand is related to the carryforward project titled Launch a Residential Parking Permit Program, which could be reduced with permit fees) from the General Fund in the coming years, not including inflation; that amount would be added to the General Fund’s structural deficit as it would be carried forward year after year.

Table 1: Necessary FY2025-2026 General Fund Funding for Possible New Projects Project FY 2025-26 Funds
General Fund
Cost Already in
Proposed
Budget
General Fund
Cost Not Yet
in Proposed
Budget
Other Funds
Priority: Civic Engagement

1. Implement Sister City and Cultural
Exchange Initiative - $70,610 -
Priority: Governance, Organizational Strength, and Fiscal Sustainability

2. Conduct Council Term Limit Policy
Research - $7,000 -
Priority: Governance, Organizational Strength, and Fiscal Sustainability

3. Develop a 10-Year Fiscal Strategy
and Structural Deficit Plan - $150,000 -

4. Implement a Centralized Grants
Management System - $150,000 -

5. Prepare 2026 Ballot Measure to
Raise Revenue for Infrastructure
Improvements and Public Facilities
$215,000 - -

6. Upgrade and Launch New City
Website - -
$50,000 – IT
Fund
127
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
Project FY 2025-26 Funds
General Fund
Cost Already in
Proposed
Budget
General Fund
Cost Not Yet
in Proposed
Budget
Other Funds
Priority: Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities

7. Conduct a Comprehensive
Evaluation of Senior Center (as
required per contract)
$80,000 - 0

8. Expand EPACenter Services and
Programs Through City Funding - -
$70,000 –
TOT*

9. Subsidize YMCA Memberships
- -
$100,000 -
TOT

10. Implement Priority Projects from
Parks, Recreation, & Open Space
Master Plan
$305,000 -
$1,755,000 –
Light Dist

11. Plan for Development of New Civic
Center Facility - - -
Priority: Public Health, Safety, and Quality of Life

12. Expand Parking Enforcement
Capacity - $350,000 -

13. Implement a Shopping Cart
Abatement Program - $2,000 -

14. Launch Emergency Preparedness
Program $160,000 - -

15. Maintain Senior/ Disabled
Individuals’ Emergency Contact
Database
- - $50,000
Priority: Public Infrastructure and Utilities

16. Install Citywide Lighting
Improvements - Phase II - -
$2,000,000-
Light Dist

17. Develop Citywide Sewer
Infrastructure Master Plan - -
$100,000 -
EPASD
Priority: Comprehensive Housing

18. Develop and Launch Home Repair
Program $125,000 - -

19. Research Feasibility of a
Residential Rental Inspection
Program
- - -

20. Update the Inclusionary Housing
Ordinance - $25,000 -

21. Research Feasibility of Financial
Empowerment and Foreclosure
Prevention Program
- - -
128
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
Project FY 2025-26 Funds
General Fund
Cost Already in
Proposed
Budget
General Fund
Cost Not Yet
in Proposed
Budget
Other Funds

22. Research the Feasibility of a FirstTime Homebuyer Assistance Program
- - -
TOTALS $885,000 $754,610 (various
funds)
* EPACenter received a separate $30,000 TOT grant,
so cumulatively this program will cost $100,000
Staff is requesting that the City Council review the project descriptions presented in Attachment B and confirm that they align with the intended scope of work and outcomes that Council wish to see advanced. Clear project scopes will be essential to track progress and avoid future misalignment or under-delivery.

While each of these projects has merit, staff has included detailed commentary on associated barriers—including staffing workload, dependency on consultant support, and funding status— to ensure full transparency. This will help the Council understand the "lift" each project represents and allow for informed decisions around phasing and implementation support. Staff has listed the anticipated time impact, the project costs (both upfront and ongoing), and the proposed schedule. Staff requests the Council review this information carefully.

Staff’s recommendations on potential new projects to be included in the Work Plan are detailed below. (Note carryforward projects are not listed here but can be found in Attachment B.) Priority: Comprehensive Housing
Launch Home Repair Program (CEDD – Housing)
This housing initiative would establish a City-supported program to deliver both minor and major home repairs for five to ten low-income households, with an emphasis on enabling senior residents to safely age in place. The program will be administered through a nonprofit partner selected via competitive RFP, and will include eligibility screening, repair coordination, community outreach, and compliance monitoring. A total of $125,000 has already been allocated in the proposed FY25-26 budget from the Community Resource Fund to support program launch of the senior home repair component of this program. The full five-year program cost is estimated at $825,000, and the remaining $700,000 in funding would need to be allocated from non-General Fund sources such as Measure JJ, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), or County CDBG. The staff workload is rated as moderate (3 out of 5). Staff supports inclusion in the Work Plan.

Research the Feasibility of a Residential Rental Inspection Program (CEDD – Building) 129
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
Community members and the City Council proposed a program that would enhance tenant protections and improve housing quality by establishing regular inspection standards and enforcement protocols to ensure residential rental properties comply with health and safety codes. Before the program can be launched, several steps are required: researching existing rental inspection programs, developing a program framework and guidelines, conducting legal review, drafting an ordinance, and obtaining City Council approval along with necessary resource allocation.

As stated above, staff does not believe the full program launch is currently feasible due to current staffing and workload limitations. However, this research-focused project is feasible.

This project involves researching other cities’ programs to understand the feasibility of a citywide Residential Rental Inspection Program to systematically inspect rental properties and ensure compliance with health and safety codes. As part of the scope of this light workload impact (2 of 5) project, staff would present to Council variants of programs, possible funding mechanisms, and resources needed. This project could be included in the Work Plan to determine whether such a program is feasible. This project does not require additional funding, as it will be implemented using existing staff capacity within current budget allocations.

Update Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (CEDD – Housing)
This project proposes a review and potential update of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to reduce constraints on housing development and align with evolving State legislation. The effort would begin following the completion of the Countywide Grand Nexus Study, which will provide essential legal and economic data to guide any recommended changes. While the project workload is moderate (3 out of 5), the initiative will require significant coordination of multiple departments. Legal risk should also be considered, as similar updates in other jurisdictions have led to protracted legal challenges. Staff recommends inclusion of this project in the Work Plan. This project is not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and expected to require a $25,000 General Fund allocation in FY25–26 to support legal review and technical analysis; no funding is anticipated beyond this one-time expenditure.

Research the Feasibility of a Residential Rental Inspection Program (CEDD – Building) This project involves researching other cities’ programs to understand the feasibility of a citywide Residential Rental Inspection Program to systematically inspect rental properties and ensure compliance with health and safety codes. As part of the scope of this light workload impact (2 of 5) project, Staff would research and present to Council variants of programs, possible funding mechanisms, and resources needed. Staff recommend inclusion of this project in the Work Plan to understand whether such a program is feasible. This project does not require additional funding, as the required research will be conducted using existing staff capacity within current budget allocations.

Research Feasibility of a Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program (CEDD – Housing)
This project, a component of the Affordable Housing Strategy, proposes a research effort to 130
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
evaluate the feasibility of creating a foreclosure prevention program aimed at supporting at-risk homeowners. This initial phase will include reviewing program models from other jurisdictions, identifying potential nonprofit and legal partners, and assessing implementation pathways specific to East Palo Alto’s housing landscape. The program would build on best practices such as early intervention systems, emergency mortgage assistance, housing counseling, and legal aid partnerships. Staff recommend inclusion in the Work Plan given its light workload impact (2 of 5), alignment with the City’s Housing priority and the potential long-term impact on housing stability for EPA residents. Implementation would be considered as a separate program, pending Council direction and funding allocations. This project does not require additional funding, as the required research will be conducted using existing staff capacity within current budget allocations.

Research the Feasibility of a First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (CEDD – Housing)
This project includes research of a down payment assistance program for eligible first-time homebuyers. This phase will focus on researching best practices and identifying potential funding models. Staff will provide recommendations to the City Council and receive further Council direction. This project does not require additional funding, as the required research will be conducted using existing staff capacity within current budget allocations.

Priority: Civic Engagement
Implement Sister City and Cultural Exchange Initiative with the Kingdom of Tonga (City Clerk)
This initiative proposes formalizing East Palo Alto’s first Sister City relationship with a city in the Kingdom of Tonga, while establishing a broader framework for future cultural exchange partnerships. Activities include forming the East Palo Alto–Tonga Sister City Committee, executing a partnership agreement, organizing mutual delegation visits, and hosting ceremonial and cultural events. The project workload is moderate (3 out of 5), and while partial funding is available, feasibility will depend heavily on the volunteer committee’s ability to coordinate logistics and fundraise for travel and events. Staff recommend inclusion in the Work Plan and could deliver on committee development, partnership planning, and coordination with Sister Cities International—with advancement to delegation travel and hosting contingent upon volunteer capacity and external fundraising progress. This project is not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and would require a one-time General Fund allocation of $70,610 in FY25–26 to support travel, event hosting, and initial partnership development activities, with a recurring annual cost of $610 to maintain membership in Sister Cities International.

Priority: Governance, Organizational Strength, and Fiscal Sustainability 131
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
Conduct Council Term Limit Policy Research (City Clerk) This project proposes legal and policy research to assess the feasibility, implications, and options for implementing term limits for City Council members. The work would include a review of best practices, legal requirements, and policy models, culminating in a report to the Council outlining term limit options and potential pathways for ballot placement.

With a manageable workload (3 out of 5), the project is a low-barrier initiative that advances transparency and supports long-term governance planning. If Council elects to move forward, additional work such as drafting ballot language and preparing election materials would be conducted in a future phase. Staff recommend inclusion of this project in the Work Plan, with any next steps contingent upon formal direction from the Council. This project is not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and would require a $7,000 General Fund allocation in FY25– 26 to support legal review and policy analysis; if Council directs ballot placement, additional funding for election-related expenses would be needed in a future phase.

Develop a 10-Year Fiscal Strategy and Structural Deficit Plan (Finance) This foundational initiative addresses the City’s estimated $2 million annual General Fund structural deficit, which would only grow in time due to inflation, through development of a comprehensive 10-year fiscal strategy. The plan will include long-range revenue and expenditure forecasting, evaluation of cost containment and revenue enhancement strategies, and alignment of capital planning with operational budgeting to ensure long-term financial sustainability. With a moderate workload (3 out of 5) and no major upfront costs, the project is highly feasible and directly aligned with the City’s Governance and Fiscal Sustainability priority.

Staff recommends inclusion in the Work Plan, as the plan is critical to addressing the City's long-term financial health and will provide strategic guidance for future budget decisions. This project is not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and would require a $150,000 General Fund allocation in FY25–26 to support consultant services for long-term fiscal forecasting, cost containment analysis, and development of revenue strategies. No ongoing funding is anticipated beyond this initial planning investment.

Implement a Grants Management System (Finance)
This project proposes the implementation of a centralized Grants Management System to safeguard and manage over $156 million in active State, federal, and local grant funds. The platform will support citywide compliance with grants regulations, improve audit readiness, and reduce the risk of missed deadlines, fund lapses, or clawbacks. By automating reporting, reimbursement, and retention functions, the system will enhance financial accountability and preserve institutional knowledge across departments. The project workload is significant (4 out 132
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
of 5) and will require software procurement, interdepartmental coordination, and staff training.

Staff recommends inclusion in the Work Plan due to the critical importance of this system in protecting public funds, ensuring regulatory compliance, and supporting sustainable grant management citywide. This project is not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and would require a one-time General Fund allocation of $150,000 in FY25–26 for system procurement and implementation. Ongoing annual costs of $20,000 will be supported through indirect cost recovery, the IT Maintenance budget, and departmental contributions.

Prepare 2026 Ballot Measure to Raise Revenue for Infrastructure Improvements and Public Facilities (CMO - Admin)
This project prepares a revenue measure for the November 2026 ballot to fund critical infrastructure improvements and public facility investments. Staff will work with consultants to design and implement a community survey, engage the public, and present findings to the Council. Pending Council direction, the initiative would proceed with measure development, legal and fiscal review, and placement on the 2026 ballot. The election process would include educational outreach and compliance with all applicable election laws. This is a high workload impact project (5 of 5). Given the project’s timeline and alignment with the City’s fiscal and infrastructure priorities, staff recommends inclusion in the Work Plan to ensure a well-planned, transparent approach to revenue generation. This project is already included in the proposed FY25-26 budget with a $215,000 General Fund allocation in FY25–26 to cover consultant costs, legal and fiscal review, community engagement, and ballot preparation. If the measure includes water infrastructure components, partial funding may be drawn from the Water Fund.

Upgrade and Launch New City Website (City Clerk)
This initiative will redesign and modernize the City's website to improve public access to information, services, and engagement tools. The project directly supports the City’s goals around transparency, digital accessibility, and customer service. It will involve crossdepartmental collaboration to ensure the site meets the diverse needs of the community. The staff workload is moderate (4 out of 5), and successful delivery will require active coordination across all departments. Staff recommend inclusion in the Work Plan, as this will enhance public-facing services and align with broader efforts to modernize City systems. This project will require a one-time cost of $50,000 for website redesign and implementation, which will be allocated from the IT Fund. No additional ongoing funding is anticipated.

Priority: Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities
133
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
Conduct a Comprehensive Evaluation of the Senior Center (CMO – CS) The City of East Palo Alto and the EPA Senior Center Incorporated have operated under a 30- year lease and operating agreement since 2006, which calls for performance evaluations every five years. To date, none of these evaluations have been conducted. This project will fulfill the City’s obligation to evaluate the Senior Center in 2026 to ensure alignment with the City's evolving goals for senior services. The evaluation will include a review of current operations, integration of goals from the City's Action Plan on Aging, and a detailed assessment of service delivery, governance, and partnership structure. Deliverables will include a list of evaluation goals, an RFP for a third-party consultant, a draft and final evaluation report, and—based on the findings—a proposed action plan for future direction. This’s project’s workload is moderate (3 out of 5). Given the lapse in required reviews and the importance of accountability and service quality, staff recommend inclusion of this evaluation in the Work Plan, with consultantled implementation and Council oversight of findings and recommendations. This project is already included in the proposed FY25–26 budget with an $80,000 General Fund allocation.

Expand EPACenter Services and Programs Through City Funding (CMO – CS) This project would establish a formal partnership with EPACenter, East Palo Alto’s only local performing arts and creative development hub, to expand its service offerings in alignment with community priorities around engagement, education, and wellness. Through a negotiated agreement, the City would provide funding to EPACenter to enhance programming access. In FY2025-26, Staff anticipates a low workload and a budget of approximately $70,000 to support live music and other similar events; in FY2026-27, EPACenter will likely request $250,000 for a suite of programming and classes. Please note that this project is currently unfunded and not included in the proposed FY25-26 budget and would require a $70,000 TOT Fund allocation.

The project’s success will depend on EPACenter’s ability to deliver on proposed outcomes, and staff will monitor implementation through quarterly reporting and community feedback mechanisms. The workload is moderate (3 out of 5), and staff recommend this project’s inclusion in the Work Plan.

Fund Community Services for YMCA (CMO – CS)
This project proposes subsidized memberships through a partnership with the YMCA. It supports the Parks, Recreation and Community Facilities priority and is included in the City’s 2023 Parks Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. Staff recommends in FY2025-26 investing $100,000 out of the unassigned TOT Fund balance and see the community’s desire for this subsidy. If the current YMCA membership costs $1200 per year per family, and the City subsidizes $1,000 of that per year for EPA families that demonstrate need, $100,000 would subsidize the membership of up to 100 families. This project is not included in the proposed FY25–26 budget and would require a $100,000 TOT Fund allocation. The workload is moderate (3 out of 5), and staff recommends inclusion of this project in the Work Plan.

Implement Priority Projects from the Parks Master Plan (PW - Engineering) This initiative includes a suite of targeted improvements identified as high-impact, quick134 POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
delivery projects within the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. The scope includes increased park lighting, installation of sports lighting at Martin Luther King Jr. Park, placement of security cameras in parks with limited sightlines, added shading, and audiovisual upgrades at Cooley Landing. These improvements are designed to enhance safety, usability, and the overall park experience and will cost $2.1 million (with $300,000 from the General Fund and $1.8 million from the Lighting District). This project is already included in the FY25- 26 proposed budget and is expected to have significant workload impacts (4 of 5). Given the project’s alignment with community priorities and the Parks Master Plan, staff recommends inclusion of this project in the Work Plan to advance enhancements across the City’s parks.

Plan for Development of New Civic Center Facility (CMO - Admin) This project entails working toward a civic center campus that combines multiple public uses.

This has very high workload impact (4 of 5) and may be at a high cost, but it would have a tremendous impact. Given its significance and alignment with long-term City facilities planning, staff recommends inclusion of the planning and pre-construction phase in the Work Plan, with construction contingent upon determining the full funding package. This project does not require additional funding, as the required research and planning will be conducted using existing staff capacity within current budget allocations.

Priority: Public Health, Safety, and Quality of Life
Expand Parking Enforcement Capacity (Police)
This project proposes to expand the City’s parking enforcement capacity through the procurement of a dedicated contractor and the use of modern enforcement technologies. The selected contractor would oversee administration of permit zones, implement a permit management system, and deploy technology-enabled strategies to improve compliance, reduce neighborhood congestion, and streamline operations. With a moderate staff workload (3 of 5) supported by contractor-led implementation, staff could support inclusion of this project in the Work Plan to support livability goals and enhance parking program effectiveness in residential neighborhoods. This project is not included in the proposed FY25–26 budget and would require an estimated $350,000 General Fund allocation to initiate a contractor-led parking enforcement program. The cost estimate is based on comparable services in other cities, such as a $700,000 annual contract in South San Francisco; actual costs will be determined through the procurement process.

Implement Shopping Cart Abatement Program (CMO - Admin) This initiative proposes the development of a Shopping Cart Abatement Program to address the growing issue of abandoned carts in public spaces. Key actions will include adoption of a dedicated ordinance, development of a clear program structure with defined roles and responsibilities, and proactive engagement with local businesses. A public awareness campaign will also be launched to promote shared accountability and educate retailers and 135
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
residents about compliance. The project carries a moderate workload (3 out of 5). Staff recommend inclusion of this project in the Work Plan. This project is not included in the proposed FY25–26 budget and would require an estimated $2,000 General Fund allocation to support ordinance development, stakeholder engagement, and public outreach efforts.

Launch Emergency Preparedness Program (CMO - Admin)
This citywide emergency preparedness effort will modernize the City’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), improve supply readiness, and strengthen emergency response capacity through staff and resident training. The project aligns strongly with the City’s Emergency and Disaster Preparedness priority and has broad Council and community support. With $160,000 already budgeted, the program is ready for launch; however, it represents a significant workload (4 out of 5) and requires sustained coordination with external partners and consultants. Staff recommend inclusion of this project in the Work Plan, recognizing the initiative’s critical role in protecting residents and ensuring operational readiness in times of crisis. This project has been included in the proposed FY25–26 budget with a $160,000 General Fund allocation.

Maintain and Expand Senior and Disabled Individuals Vulnerability and Emergency Contact Database (CMO – CS)
This project supports disaster preparedness for vulnerable populations by updating and expanding the City's existing contact database. It aligns with Emergency and Disaster Preparedness priority and has low staffing and workload needs (2 out of 5). With funding secured, its feasibility is high and staff recommends inclusion in the Work Plan. The project would entail calling upon partnerships with local nonprofits to maximize reach and accuracy.

This project is not included in the proposed FY25–26 budget and would require a $50,000 General Fund allocation.

Priority: Public Infrastructure and Utilities
Install Citywide Lighting Improvements – Phase 2 (PW - Engineering) This project continues the City’s multi-phase effort to enhance public safety and visibility through upgraded lighting infrastructure. Phase 2 is a low workload impact project (2 of 5) that includes completing a comprehensive lighting study to assess citywide needs and priorities, followed by implementation of targeted lighting improvements based on study findings. Staff recommend inclusion of this phase in the Work Plan to build on recent progress and address lighting gaps across the community. Deliverables include completion of the lighting study and installation of identified improvements. This project is included in the proposed FY25–26 budget with a $2 million allocation from the Street Lighting Fund. It will also require approximately $10,000 annually in ongoing maintenance expenses.

Develop Citywide Sewer Master Plan (PW - Engineering)
This plan will provide a long-range roadmap for sewer system repairs and fiscal planning. It directly supports the Public Infrastructure and Utilities priority. With consultant support and 136
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
funding already in place, the project is feasible despite moderate staffing needs (3 out of 5).

Staff recommends inclusion of this project in the Work Plan as a foundational investment in infrastructure resilience. This project is included in the proposed FY25–26 budget with a $100,000 allocation from EPASD Enterprise Funds to complete the planning process.

Council Review of Proposed Work Plan Projects
Staff requests that the City Council confirm which of the 37 carryforward projects and which of the 22 new proposed projects should be included in the final FY2025–2027 Work Plan. Council may also provide direction to defer, revise, or phase any project. To support effective implementation, staff additionally requests that Councilmembers review the full project feasibility details and scopes in Attachment B to ensure they align with the desired outcomes and levels of service. Clear Council confirmation on both project selection and scope will support execution and accountability over the next two years.

Monitoring and Reporting
To ensure transparency and accountability once the Work Plan is adopted, the City will implement a structured monitoring process. Staff will report the status of these projects quarterly to the City Council. The City will also update the community via the City website and other communication channels.

Next Steps and Adoption Timeline
Pending Council direction at the June 3 meeting, staff will make final refinements and present the FY2025-27 Work Plan for adoption on June 17, 2025. Implementation of the FY2025–2027 Work Plan will begin on July 1, 2025.

Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact from the City Council’s confirmation of project selection for the FY2025-2027 Work Plan. Funding requests for projects anticipated to begin in FY2025–2026 will be included in the FY2025–2026 Proposed Budget. Projects scheduled to start in FY2026– 2027 will be considered in that year’s budget cycle.

Public Notice
The public was provided notice by making the agenda and report available on the City’s website and on a bulletin board located at City Hall: 2415 University Avenue, East Palo Alto.

Environmental
The action being considered does not constitute a “Project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378(b)(5), in that it is a government administrative activity that will not result in direct or 137
POLICY AND ACTION ITEM 9.2
indirect changes in the environment.

Government Code § 84308
Applicability of Levine Act: No.

Analysis of Levine Act Compliance: Not applicable.

Attachments

1. Attachment A: Community Engagement Summary and Survey Results

2. Attachment B: Evaluation of Proposed New and Carryforward FY 2025-2027 Council Work Plan Projects
138
Attachment A: Community Engagement Summary
and Survey Results
Grounding the Strategic Priorities Framework and Council Work Plan Projects in Community Input
This report provides a summary of community feedback gathered throughout the City’s community engagement process in April and May 2025 to inform the development of the FY2025–2029 Strategic Priorities and the FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan. Insights from this process played a vital role in shaping the final project list and ensuring that the City’s priorities reflect both longstanding and emerging community needs.

Engagement Overview
In May 2025, the City of East Palo Alto hosted two community workshops to support development of the FY2025–2029 Strategic Priorities and FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan. Staff held the first workshop in person at the Lewis & Joan Platt YMCA on May 7, 2025 from 6:30-8 PM, which had 10 attendees. The second workshop was conducted virtually on Zoom on May 12, 2025 from 6:30 -8 PM and had 27 registrants. Staff also engaged residents at pop-up outreach events held at the Bloomhouse Farmers Market (on April 30, 2025 from 9 AM – 12 PM) and the Cinco de Mayo community celebration at Bell Street Park on May 4, 2025 from 12 PM – 4 PM.

The City designed this engagement effort to achieve three key goals:
 Inform residents about the City's work to develop new Strategic Priorities and Projects;
 Invite the community to analyze and reflect on the draft priorities and projects developed through prior engagement;
 Gather feedback to help the City Council finalize the FY2025–2027 Work Plan.

To maximize participation, staff launched a wide-reaching outreach campaign to support both workshops and a bilingual community survey. In addition to hosting in-person and virtual workshops, the City administered an online survey to gather broader input from residents unable to attend events. Staff posted flyers in public spaces, promoted the events and survey link on the City’s website and social media, and sent announcements through City email listservs. They also provided materials to City Councilmembers to distribute through their networks and emailed community-based organizations, encouraging them to share the information with their constituents. This multi-channel strategy aimed to ensure that community members across the city had a meaningful 139
opportunity to shape the City’s strategic direction and identify the projects that matter most to them.

Two versions of the online survey were administered—one in English (garnering 168 responses) and one in Spanish (10 responses). Both showed a high level of general agreement with the draft strategic priorities. Among English-language respondents, nearly 80% either agreed or strongly agreed with the list of priorities. Spanish-language participants expressed even stronger alignment, with 90% indicating agreement. While the general consensus affirmed the City’s direction, many respondents expressed a desire for greater clarity around how priorities would be implemented, how progress would be communicated to the public, and how funding would be allocated.

Key Themes from Community Input
Public Infrastructure, Safety, and Cleanliness
Issues of safety, street conditions, and general neighborhood quality-of-life dominated community responses. Participants across all engagement formats identified traffic congestion, parking availability, and street lighting as top concerns. The highest-ranking projects in both surveys included expansion of parking enforcement capacity, completion of the street lighting upgrade project, and sidewalk improvements along key corridors. These concerns were especially prominent among Spanish-speaking respondents and attendees of the in-person workshop, where many emphasized the need for cleaner streets, stronger traffic enforcement, and expanded resources for emergency preparedness.

Emergency readiness also emerged as a cross-cutting priority. Participants expressed strong support for projects that enhance the City’s disaster response infrastructure, such as launching an Emergency Preparedness Program and maintaining a database of vulnerable senior and disabled residents.

Housing Affordability, Stability, and Livability
Concerns around housing affordability and residential stability remain high among East Palo Alto residents. Participants called for the City to increase its efforts to preserve existing housing, expand affordable homeownership options, and support legacy residents at risk of displacement. Projects such as the Home Repair Program, the Foreclosure Prevention Fund, and the First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program received consistent support across surveys and workshops.

Several respondents also called for the City to implement a rental inspection program to ensure basic livability standards, especially in multifamily properties. While some 140
expressed concerns about the City’s enforcement capacity, there was broad agreement on the need for greater oversight and accountability for landlords.

Youth, Seniors, and Community Services
The importance of investing in young people and seniors was another recurring theme.

Participants supported the formation of a Youth Commission and requested increased opportunities for youth civic engagement, mentorship, and leadership development.

Residents also emphasized the value of expanding access to community-based services, including YMCA subsidies, EPACenter programs, and neighborhood events that promote wellness and safety in public parks.

Seniors expressed interest in more accessible emergency preparedness resources, expanded transportation options, and an evaluation of services provided by the EPA Senior Center. One idea that gained traction was to launch a preparedness group specifically for older adults and those with access or functional needs.

Mental Health and Public Health
Mental health was frequently mentioned as a missing or underemphasized priority.

Participants cited the need for mental health support in schools, greater access to culturally competent counseling, and funding for public health initiatives that address conditions such as autism and stroke risk. Some participants expressed concern that the City’s current strategic priorities do not go far enough in addressing the root causes of health disparities in East Palo Alto.

Economic Development and Workforce Opportunities
While housing and infrastructure dominated immediate concerns, participants also voiced strong support for efforts to strengthen the City’s economic base. Residents expressed a desire to see more commercial activity within city limits—particularly everyday services like grocery stores, banks, and cafes—as well as expanded job training opportunities for youth and adults. The Measure HH Workforce Development Program and the development of an Economic Development Strategy both received broad support.

Transparency, Civic Engagement, and Inclusion
A consistent thread across feedback was a desire for improved transparency and more accessible, proactive communication from the City. Residents called for upgrades to the City website, clearer timelines for project delivery, and more user-friendly ways to report issues or track project status. In addition, several comments highlighted the need to activate currently dormant City commissions and create more opportunities for residents to be involved in decision-making.
141
Some residents also urged the City to take additional steps to preserve community identity, honor cultural legacies, and address the displacement of long-term residents— particularly members of the African American community. These themes were particularly prominent in workshop settings and open-ended survey comments.

Summary of Community Top Priority Projects Based on Survey Rankings Across both the English and Spanish surveys, a total of 162 respondents offered rankings on the most important projects to them for the 2025-2027 Work Plan. The topranked projects from the English and Spanish surveys illustrate a strong community consensus around infrastructure, housing stability, and neighborhood quality:

Top priority projects, ranked:

1. Develop Citywide Sewer Master Plan (n=90)

2. Expand Parking Enforcement Capacity (n=86)

3. Complete the Street Lighting Upgrade Project and Begin Multi-Phase Lighting Project (n=76)

4. Launch Emergency Preparedness Program (n=73)

5. Implement Parks Lighting and Safety Improvement Program (n=66)

6. Develop a Long-Term Fiscal Strategy and Structural Deficit Plan (n=66)

7. Launch Home Repair Program (n=65)

8. Consider Establishing a Youth Commission and/or Youth Appointees to City Boards/Commissions (n=63)

9. Implement First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program (n=60)

10.Fund Community Services for YMCA (n=59)

11.Plan for Development of Community Hub (New City Hall) (n=58)

12.Design and Construct Road Improvements on Woodland Avenue from University Avenue to Newell Road (n=57)

13.Implement Quick-Win Projects from the Parks Master Plan (n=57)

14.Study the Creation of Parks and Recreation Department (n=42)

15.Launch Foreclosure Prevention Fund (n=42)

16.Prepare 2026 Ballot Measure to Raise Revenue for Infrastructure Improvements and Public Facilities (n=41)

17.Launch Residential Rental Inspection (n=41)

18.Launch Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program (n=41)

19.Conduct Council Term Limit Policy Research (n=41)

20.Fund Community Services for EPACenter to Expand Services and Programs (n=40)

21.Implement Shopping Cart Abatement Program (n=40)

22.Implement a Grants Management System (n=39)

23.Review and Potentially Update Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (n=37) 142

24.Upgrade and Launch New City Website (n=30)
How Community Input Informed the Final Work Plan
Community feedback throughout the FY2025–2029 strategic planning process played a critical role in affirming the City’s emerging priorities and shaping refinements to better reflect resident needs. Community members expressed strong support for investments in public infrastructure, housing stability, safety, and services for youth and seniors.

They also underscored the importance of transparency, cultural inclusion, and more accessible communication about City initiatives.

While the City deeply values every idea and concern shared, the Council Work Plan reflects difficult but necessary choices. Limited staff capacity and funding mean that not every issue raised could be included at this time. However, community feedback has been documented in full, and the City intends to revisit and explore additional priorities as capacity grows. Some projects not included in this cycle may be better suited for future planning efforts, operational improvements, or external partnerships with the County of San Mateo, nonprofits, and other community partners.

This input has directly informed the design of the FY2025–2027 Council Work Plan and will continue to guide staff as projects move forward. The City remains committed to ongoing engagement and collaboration to ensure the plan delivers meaningful, visible improvements in the daily lives of East Palo Alto community members - and to maintain a responsive and inclusive approach to future decision-making. 143
Key Project Count
♦ = New Proposed Project Recommended for Inclusion in Work Plan 22 🔷 = Carryforward Projects Recommended for Inclusion in Work Plan 37 Strikethrough = Projects Not Recommended for Inclusion in Work Plan 5 $3,605,610.00 $1,639,610.00
^ Total Impact on General Fund in FY 25-26 ^ Total New Projects (♦) Impact on General Fund Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
🔷Develop Recommendations for Establishing a Youth Commission or Alternative Youth Civic Engagement Program
Develop a plan for launching a Youth Commission or a comparable civic engagement initiative based on community input and feedback from youth-serving organizations. Staff will also explore internship and civic education opportunities as part of this planning effort. (Note: This is a planning and feasibility project only; implementation would require additional staffing or consultant resources.)
CMO -
CS 4 $10,000.00
♦Implement Sister City and Cultural Exchange Initiative Establish a Sister City relationship with a City from the Kingdom of Tonga and develop a formal exchange program. Create a process for the City Council to evaluate and establish additional Sister City relationships in the future.

City
Clerk 3 $70,610.00
Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q3 Q3 Q4
🔷Collaborate with the SMC Libraries to Identify and Implement a Comprehensive Funding Strategy for Library Construction Partner with SMCL and the SMCL Foundation to fundraise through a capital campaign. The estimated independent library construction costs are $43M.

CMO -
Admin 2 N/A
♦Conduct Council Term Limit Policy Research
Research and draft policy recommendations regarding term limits for City Council members.

Present findings and receive Council direction on whether to place a term limit measure on a future election ballot.

City
Clerk 3 $7,000.00
♦Develop a 10-Year Fiscal Strategy and Structural Deficit Plan Address the City’s $2 million structural General Fund deficit by developing a comprehensive 10-year financial strategy. The plan will identify solutions to contain costs, enhance operational efficiency, diversify revenues, and finance long-term infrastructure needs. It will serve as a roadmap to fiscal sustainability, reduced financial risk, and continued delivery of core services.

Finance 3 $150,000.00
🔷Develop a Citywide Information Systems Master Plan
Create a strategic blueprint for the development, modernization, and governance of the City’s technology systems, including infrastructure, cybersecurity, and digital services to support efficient municipal operations.

CMO - IT 3 N/A
♦Implement a Centralized Grants Management System
Deploy a centralized, cloud-based Grants Management System to oversee $156 million in citywide grant funding. The platform will ensure compliance with federal regulations, improve audit readiness, streamline reimbursement workflows, and enhance financial oversight. The system will support departments in maintaining compliance, preventing funding losses, and preserving institutional knowledge.

Finance 4 $150,000.00
♦ Prepare 2026 Ballot Measure to Raise Revenue for Infrastructure Improvements and Public Facilities
Evaluate and, if feasible, initiate the process to place a revenue measure on the November 2026 ballot. This measure would help fund critical infrastructure and public facilities upgrades.

CMO -
Admin 5 $215,000.00
🔷Update the City’s Personnel Policies and Procedures
Modernize the City’s 1985 Personnel Policies and Procedures to align with current employment laws, operational needs, and best practices. The update will include legal review, stakeholder input, labor negotiations, and rollout through training and accessible documentation. Final adoption is anticipated no earlier than July 2027.

CMO -
HR 5 $50,000.00
♦Upgrade and Launch New City Website
Redesign and relaunch the City’s website to improve public access to information, enhance service delivery, and promote greater community engagement through modern, userfriendly design.

City
Clerk 4 N/A
Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Priority: Land Use, Economic, and Workforce Development Priority: Governance, Organizational Strength, and Fiscal Sustainability Priority: Civic Engagement
$1,966,000.00
^ Total Carryforward Projects (🔷) Impact on General Fund FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
144
🔷Conclude Measure HH Pilot Evaluation and Initiate Ongoing Workforce Development Program
Complete the Measure HH Workforce Development Pilot Program evaluation and use the findings to guide the launch of a multi-year workforce development program focused on economic mobility and priority populations.

CEDD -
Housing 3 N/A
🔷Create an Economic Development Strategic Plan Focusing on Small and Micro Businesses
Develop a comprehensive report that incorporates existing conditions, community outreach summaries, and recommendations to support local entrepreneurship, create job opportunities, leverage strategic sites, and diversify the City’s tax base to increase revenue.

Implementation is not included and will have to be a separate priority.

CMO -
Admin 3 $120,000.00
🔷Design and Implement a "Pop-Up"/Sidewalk Vending Policy and Program Develop and implement a Sidewalk Vending Policy that supports compliant, safe, and equitable vending practices. The program includes development of regulations, bilingual outreach materials, and one-on-one vendor support to promote small business growth.

CMO -
Admin 4 $18,000.00
🔷Implement Program to Distribute Community Resource Funds Grants for Small Business Assistance
Implement a Community Resource Fund grant program, as directed by the City Council, to provide financial assistance and capacity-building resources to small businesses in East Palo Alto.

CMO -
Admin 1 $125,000.00
🔷Renovate the Cummings Loft Property into a Small Business Incubator Use a $555,000 SBA grant to renovate the former Redevelopment Agency’s Cummings Loft site—currently in cold shell condition—into an incubator space to support emerging small businesses. The project includes design and construction phases.

PW -
Eng 2 N/A
Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
🔷Activate City Parks with Health and Safety Programming Explore and implement new strategies to activate City parks through pop-up health and safety programming, building on the success of the former FIT Zone initiative. The City will assess prior program models, collaborate with the Police Department to clarify past roles, and identify opportunities for a contractor or consultant to lead future implementation. The goal is to launch a pilot program that enhances community use of parks, promotes wellbeing, and improves public safety. Based on pilot results, staff will develop a sustainable, long-term strategy for continuing park activation independent of grant funding.

CMO -
CS 3 N/A
🔷Complete Construction of Tenant Improvements in the Former Police Evidence Room
Complete improvements at the 1960 Tate Office and at the Police Department Facility. 1960 Tate Street: The scope of work for the improvements at this site includes the removal and replacement of the existing roof shingles, rain gutters and downspouts, installation of new four-foot-wide awnings, and the removal and replacement of the current heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system. 141 Demeter: The scope of work for the improvements at this site includes the installation of new roofing at the facility’s buildings A, B, and C; repair of damaged dry rot on the existing facades for each building; installation of new exterior siding; rehabilitation of bathrooms; replacing awning; and installation of new heat pumps.

PW -
Eng 1 N/A
♦Conduct a Comprehensive Evaluation of the Senior Center (as required per contract)
Conduct a formal evaluation of the City’s 30-year agreement with the EPA Senior Center Incorporated, as required every five years under the lease. No evaluations have occurred since the agreement began in 2006, despite required reviews in 2011, 2016, 2021, and 2026.

CMO -
CS 3 $80,000.00
🔷Construct Access Improvements at Rutgers Street Entrance to the Bay Trail
Improve pedestrian access to the Bay Trail by coordinating with MidPeninsula Open Space and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to open the currently locked Rutgers Street gate. The project involves securing easements and installing a compliant access point.

PW -
Eng 1 $75,000.00
🔷Create a Pilot Dog Park Program
Identify and prepare a temporary site for a dog park using above-ground amenities.

Community Services will evaluate community usage during the pilot phase to determine long-term feasibility. The pilot park will follow standard park hours, with no lighting or landform changes.

CMO -
CS 4 $75,000.00
🔷Establish a Joint-Use Agreement with RCSD for Shared Recreation Sites Collaborate with the Ravenswood City School District to enter into a Joint-Use Agreement that enables public use of school recreational sites during non-school hours to expand community access to park space.

CMO -
CS 3 $50,000.00
♦Expand EPACenter Services and Programs Through City Funding Establish a formal funding agreement with EPACenter, East Palo Alto’s only local performing arts venue, to expand its programming and deepen the City’s partnership in youth development and community arts services.

CMO -
CS 3 N/A
🔷Finalize Architectural Design for the New East Palo Alto Library Complete the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) for the new East Palo Alto Library to prepare for future construction and funding efforts.

PW -
Eng 2 N/A
♦Subsidize YMCA Memberships
Enter into a funding agreement with the YMCA to provide free or reduced-cost memberships and expand public access to health and wellness services for East Palo Alto residents.

CMO -
CS 3 N/A
FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027) Priority: Parks, Recreation, and Community Facilities 145
♦Implement Priority Projects from the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
Deliver high-impact park improvements, including sports lighting for Martin Luther King Junior Park, cameras in all parks that lack sightlines, shading, and AV improvements at Cooley Landing.

CMO -
CS 4 $305,000.00
🔷Negotiate with County to finalize acquisition of Beech Street Negotiate with San Mateo County to complete a potential land swap of 2277 University Avenue for 1266 Beech Street. If the County agrees, the City will finalize the acquisition to support park expansion or civic use.

CMO -
Admin 1 N/A
♦Plan for Development of New Civic Center Facility
Launch planning for a new civic center campus that will house a new library, police department, and administrative offices. This project will include needs assessment, site planning, community engagement, and funding strategy.

CMO -
Admin 5 N/A
♦Study the Creation of Parks and Recreation Department
Evaluate the benefits, costs, and feasibility of establishing a standalone Parks and Recreation Department, which would replace the current organizational structure where recreation programs are managed within the Community Services division.

CMO -
Admin 3 N/A
Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Fiscal Impact
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
♦Expand Parking Enforcement Capacity
Expand the City’s parking enforcement program by contracting with a vendor experienced in residential permit parking and modern enforcement technology. The contractor will manage permit zones and utilize data-driven strategies to improve compliance, reduce neighborhood congestion, and increase operational efficiency.

Police 3 $350,000.00
🔷Implement a Crime Data Analytics Platform for the Police Department Enhance the police department’s data analytics capabilities through the deployment of new technology systems and staff resources to improve analysis of crime trends, optimize resource deployment, and increase transparency and community trust. This project is grantfunded.

Police 4 N/A
♦Implement a Shopping Cart Abatement Program
Establish a program to address and reduce abandoned shopping carts in public spaces through code enforcement, retailer outreach, and coordinated retrieval efforts.

CMO -
Admin 3 $2,000.00
🔷Launch a Residential Parking Permit Program
Adopt and implement a residential parking permit program to manage neighborhood parking demand and improve residential parking access.

PW -
Eng 2 $400,000.00
♦Launch Emergency Preparedness Program
Implement a citywide emergency preparedness initiative focused on updating the Emergency Operations Plan, enhancing internal coordination, expanding staff and community training, and improving emergency supply readiness.

CMO -
Admin 4 $160,000.00
♦Maintain Senior/Disabled Individuals' Emergency Contact Database Develop and maintain a comprehensive contact database for senior and disabled residents to ensure timely communication and response during emergencies.

CMO -
CS 2 N/A
🔷Strengthen the Clean City Program to Reduce Illegal Dumping Enhance the City’s illegal dumping response program to reduce incidents, promote environmental quality, and support beautification efforts throughout East Palo Alto.

PW -
Env 2 N/A
🔷Update the Environmental Justice Element of the General Plan Update the Environmental Justice Element to ensure consistency with State law and to incorporate local community priorities regarding health, equity, and environmental impacts CEDD -
Planning 1 $2,000.00
🔷Update the Safety Element of the General Plan
Update the Safety Element to align with State requirements and reflect local community goals related to resilience, hazard mitigation, and public safety.

CEDD -
Planning 1 $2,000.00
Project Description
Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
🔷Assess Utility Operations and Prepare Transition Plan for Post-Lease Operations
Evaluate options for managing the City’s water utility after the Veolia lease expires in April 2026. Options include extending the existing lease, contracting with a new provider, or transitioning operations in-house. Staff is currently in discussions with Veolia for a temporary lease extension while alternatives are explored.

CMO -
Admin 1 N/A
🔷Build Sidewalk and Pedestrian Safety Improvements on East Bayshore Road
Construct pedestrian and cyclist safety improvements along East Bayshore Road from Euclid Avenue to Menalto Avenue. Project elements include sidewalks, bikeways, traffic calming measures, green infrastructure, and lighting upgrades.

PW -
Eng 3 $920,000.00
FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 -
June 30, 2026)
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
Priority: Public Infrastructure and Utilities
Priority: Public Health, Safety, and Quality of Life
146
🔷Collaborate with City of Palo Alto to replace the Newell Street bridge Partner with the City of Palo Alto, the lead agency, to replace the Newell Street Bridge. East Palo Alto will provide engineering and site inspection support for the project.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Collaborate with SFCJPA to Construct San Francisquito Creek Flood Protection Upgrades
Support the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority (SFCJPA) in designing and constructing flood capacity improvements to protect East Palo Alto. Design is expected to be completed within three years. Construction is contingent on securing sufficient funding.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Collaborate with SFCJPA to implement the SAFER Bay Project Partner with SFCJPA to design and construct a levee that protects East Palo Alto from sea level rise. Design is expected to be completed within three years. Construction will proceed only if full funding is secured.

PW -
Eng 5 N/A
♦Install Citywide Lighting Improvements - Phase II
Implement Phase II of the City’s lighting plan, which includes conducting a lighting study and completing citywide lighting upgrades.

PW -
Eng 2 N/A
🔷Conduct a Siting Study to Identify Locations for Additional Water Storage Tanks
Conduct a water tank siting study to identify feasible locations within East Palo Alto for new water storage infrastructure. The study will assess tank configurations, operational needs, and long-term maintenance strategies for the proposed facility.

PW -
Eng 1 N/A
🔷Construct a Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing on University Avenue at US 101
Widen the University Avenue/US 101 overpass by constructing a 14-foot-wide pedestrian and bicycle bridge. The project also includes vehicle improvements to the US 101 on- and off-ramps at University Avenue to support safer and more efficient multimodal travel.

PW -
Eng 4 N/A
🔷Construct Full Trash Capture Devices to Meet Stormwater Compliance Requirements
Install two full trash capture devices at Newell Bridge on Saratoga Avenue to comply with State stormwater regulations and reduce pollution in local waterways.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Construct Mini Roundabouts to Replace Temporary Traffic Circles on Pulgas Avenue
Construct two mini roundabouts at Pulgas Avenue to replace temporary traffic circles. The scope also includes installation of additional signage and striping improvements to support traffic calming and safety.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Create a Financing Strategy for Water Infrastructure Upgrades Develop a water infrastructure financing strategy using $800,000 in FY 2023 Congressionally Directed Spending from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The strategy will leverage existing resources, including ratepayer-funded capital improvement fees, to identify funding sources for critical water system improvements.

This project will continue beyond June 2025 and the federal funding must be used before it expires. Completion is anticipated by Summer 2026.

Finance 4 N/A
🔷Design Roadway Improvements on Woodland Avenue
Design comprehensive roadway improvements on Woodland Avenue from University Avenue to Newell Road. Scope includes roadway reconstruction, utility upgrades, sidewalk, curb, and gutter work, and installation of new lighting.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Develop an Asset Management Database
Continue development of an integrated Asset Management Database encompassing all Cityowned infrastructure, including water and sewer systems, to improve asset tracking and long-term maintenance planning.

PW -
Main 3 $100,000.00
♦Develop Citywide Sewer Infrastructure Master Plan
Prepare a comprehensive sewer master plan that evaluates existing infrastructure conditions and provides a roadmap for phased upgrades to support long-term system capacity and reliability.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
🔷Install New Traffic Signal and Complete Safety Upgrades on University Avenue at Runnymede
Improve pedestrian and traffic safety at the University Avenue and Runnymede intersection by installing a new traffic signal with upgraded equipment and protected left-turn phases, along with pedestrian crossing enhancements to reduce conflicting vehicle movements.

PW -
Eng 2 N/A
🔷Modernize Equipment and Complete Rehabilitation of the O’Connor Pump Station
Complete Phase II of the O’Connor Pump Station rehabilitation, including electrical upgrades, pump replacement, shaft realignment, pavement restoration, building configuration improvements, and control system modernization.

PW -
Eng 3 N/A
Project Description Lead
Workload
Impact
1=low,
5=high)
FY 25-26
Costs
(General
Fund)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
🔷Complete Construction of 965 Weeks/Colibri Commons
Oversee the building permit process to ensure compliance with local codes and ordinances during the construction of Colibri Commons. Responsibilities include permit issuance, construction inspections, and verifying code compliance throughout the build.

CEDD -
Building 3 N/A
FY 2026-27 (July 1, 2026 -
June 30, 2027)
Priority: Comprehensive Housing FY 2025-26 (July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026)
147
♦Develop and Launch Home Repair Program
Develop and implement a home repair program that provides funding for minor and major repairs to 5–10 low-income homeowners. The program will include a senior-focused component to help older residents age in place through needed repairs and safety improvements.

CEDD -
Housing 3 $125,000.00
🔷Establish Rent Registry for Both Rent-Stabilized and Market-Rate Rental Units
Launch a citywide rent registry to replace the outdated rent stabilization database. This project was approved in the FY23–24 City Council budget and will improve compliance monitoring, data transparency, and enforcement capacity for all covered rental units.

CEDD -
RSP 4 N/A
♦Research Feasibility of a Residential Rental Inspection Program Assess the feasibility of establishing a systematic rental inspection program to ensure safety, habitability, and compliance with health and building codes across residential rental properties.

CEDD -
Building 2 N/A
♦Launch a Residential Rental Inspection Program Establish systematic inspections for multi-unit properties to ensure safety and compliance CEDD -
Building 5 N/A
♦Update the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
Upon completion of the Grand Nexus Study, present results to City Council and provide list of potential amendments to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) to reduce contraints.

CEDD -
Housing 3 $25,000.00
🔷Update the Zoning Code
Regular update of Zoning Code to respond to State legislative changes, process improvements, permanent supportive housing, housekeeping units, residential care facilities, and to incorporate objective design standards to faciliate new housing.

CEDD -
Planning 1 $1,000.00
♦Launch a Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program Launch a program that provides financial literacy, credit-building education, and foreclosure prevention funding services using Measure JJ and other city housing funds.

CEDD -
Housing 4 N/A
♦Research Feasibility of a Financial Empowerment and Foreclosure Prevention Program
Conduct research and internal analysis to assess the feasibility of creating a foreclosure prevention fund to support homeowners at risk of losing their homes. This phase will explore best practices, legal structures, and nonprofit partnerships used in other jurisdictions.

CEDD -
Housing 2 N/A
♦Implement a First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program Implement a down payment assistance program for eligible first-time homebuyers.

CEDD -
Housing 2 N/A
♦Research Feasibility of a First-Time Homebuyer Assistance Program Research and assess down payment assistance models for eligible first-time homebuyers.

This phase will focus on evaluating program design, eligibility, and funding options.

Identification of a sustainable funding source will be necessary before implementation.

CEDD -
Housing 2 N/A
148