PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Gap Closure
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will connect from 2,450 LF east of Hellman Ave to Archibald Avenue. The total length of the proposed project is approximately 3,200 LF including a bridge over the Cucamonga Creek. Both road and bridge will serve 4 lanes of traffic including bicycle and pedestrian facilities. A separate pedestrian bridge over the Cucamonga Creek little south of the proposed vehicular bridge, as shown on the below map, is also part of this project.
PROJECT STATUS: 90% plans and specifications under review.
Construction Management service procured.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: Design contract award date - May 22, 2019 30% design completed - December 2019
NOD filed - December 2020
90% design - November 2021
Estimated 100% design - February 2022
PROJECT MAP:
Proposed Limonite Ave Bridge
Proposed Pedestrian Bridge
186
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity/ATP Trails PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and construct nearly 5 miles of trails running along Scholar Way and Harrison Avenue. The project will provide dedicated space for people to bike and walk from north Eastvale to the Santa Ana River Trail on the south.
PROJECT STATUS: Design contract was awarded to Mark Thomas. Preliminary design work has started. Community outreach meeting is scheduled for January 22, 2022.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: Mark Thomas is performing Phase 1A efforts consisting of preliminary design and public outreach.
PROJECT MAP:
187
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: ADA Transition Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Program includes preparation and implementation of an ADA Self Evaluation Plan as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Future year funding will support removal of ADA barriers as identified in the Plan. Annual program to provide improvements focusing on ADA accessibility, including curb ramps and sidewalks throughout the City.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: This is an on-going project. Currently, field work to identify ADA barriers on City streets including curb ramps and sidewalks is on hold.
CDBG application has been submitted for funding.
188
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Sign Inventory
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will improve roadway safety and traffic through upgrades to existing and/or adding new high-visibility traffic signs.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: Inventory of traffic sign has been completed. Currently, field work to collect reflectivity of signs to meet MUTCD is on-going. 189
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Archibald Avenue/Limonite Avenue Widening Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street widening and safety project for Archibald Avenue from the City of Ontario limits south of the SCE easement, including the intersection at Limonite Avenue and portions of Limonite Avenue east and west of the intersection. The project looks to improve safety and overall circulation in conjunction with the improvements associated with the Homestead and Merge developments, and Limonite Gap Project. Components of the project include, but are not limited to, coordinating with SCE to relocate SCE high-tension support structures.
PROJECT STATUS: • City approved the proposed design plan from SCE on July 14, 2021. • SCE is procuring materials and submitted encroachment permit application to the City.
• Construction for foundation is expected to begin in summer 2022.
PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE
ARCHIBALD AVE
190
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Prado (TR 35751)
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Schleisman Road and Cucamonga Flood Channel PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include a development of a gated community of 243 attached and detached single-family homes on approximately 19 acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Punch list items have been issued.
PROJECT MAP:
SCHLEISMAN RD
191
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Pulte (TR 28943)
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Scholar Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements consists of 79 residential units.
PROJECT STATUS: Improvements have been completed. Project close-out task is remaining before city council accepts the project as complete.
PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE
SCHOLAR WAY
192
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Merge
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 26 gross acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:ARCHIBALD AVE
LIMONITE AVE
193
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch by Transwestern
PROJECT NUMBER: PW19-11322
PROJECT LOCATION: East end of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 20 gross acres including 2 light industrial warehouses.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:
CUCAMONGA CREEK
HELLMAN AVE
194
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Homestead
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10052
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 55.86 gross acres consisting of six industrial buildings
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE ARCHIBALD AVE
195
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Vantage Point Church
PROJECT NUMBER: PW15-1174
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Prado Basin Park Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include development of an approximately 85,000 sq. ft. church which includes a sanctuary, classrooms, cafe, and a bookstore on 10.43 acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
PROJECT MAP:
196
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Hamner Place
PROJECT NUMBER: PW18-10712
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 21.48 gross acres.
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
PROJECT MAP:
HAMNER AVE
197
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Beazer Homes (Tract 31476)
PROJECT NUMBER: PW12-0679
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 40.6 gross acres. Improvements include the construction of Hellman Avenue (half street) and the associated water, sewer, and drainage improvements.
PROJECT STATUS: Public improvements completed
PROJECT MAP:
WALTERS ST
HELLMAN AVE
198
EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT UPDATES
PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Campus Business Park
PROJECT NUMBER: PW12-0750
PROJECT LOCATION: West side of Archibald Avenue south of Limonite Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 53.37 gross acres with 11 development parcels and 6 letter lots.
PROJECT STATUS: Public improvements completed. Project close-out task is remaining before city council accepts the project as complete.
PROJECT MAP:
LIMONITE AVE ARCHIBALD AVE
199
Agency Grant Name Project Name Grant Award Match Due Date Status CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant
TRP 10
Annual Overlay Project $ 203,180.00 $ - 3/1/2022 Under construction as part of the Annual Overlay Project
CTC/
Caltrans
Active Transportation Project Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity
$ 6,471,000.00 $ 1,620,000.00 6/30/2025 Under design
CTC/
Caltrans
Local Partnership Program Limonite Gap Closure Project $ 9,475,000.00 $ - Award construction by December 2022
Grant request has been
approved. Allocation for
construction funds will be
requested in Summner 2022.
CTC/
Caltrans
Active Transportation Project Southeast Eastvale Safe Routes to School Gap Closures
$ 1,420,000.00 $ - Construction in
FY22/23
Grant request has been
approved
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 10
Advanced Dilemma Zone
Detection
$ 712,800.00 $ - Under design
Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) Cycle 10
Retroflective Backplate for
Signals
$ 278,100.00 $ - Under design
CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant
TRP 13
Annual Overlay Project $ 174,999.00 $ - April 1, 2023 Grant request has been approved
RCTC SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety
Enhancement on Citrus St,
Sumner Ave and River Rd
$ 432,500.00 $ 469,953.00 Under construction as part of the Annual Overlay Project
CAL FIRE Resource Management Grant City of Eastvale Urban Foresty Management
$ 249,925.00 $ 60,024.00 March 30, 2024 Grant request has been approved
National
Endowment
for the Arts
Our Town FY22 Limonite Avenue Roundabout
Sculpture/Art Element
$ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 August 2021 Announcement of grant in April 2022
PUBLIC WORKS GRANTS SUMMARY
AWARDED GRANTS
FUTURE GRANTS
200
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.6
January 26, 2022
City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – October & November 2021 Prepared By:
Eva Terekhova, Emergency Management Specialist
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Eastvale Crime Sta s
cs for October &
November 2021.
Summary
The City Council requested staff to collaborate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to develop a crime sta
s
cs document that would reflect selected Part I and Part II crime data for the City of Eastvale. Intended to show month-to-month crime sta s
cs, the document will assist in
determining appropriate staffing levels for law enforcement services.
Background
In May 2017, City Council directed staff to coordinate with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to request and obtain monthly crime sta
s
cs for the City of Eastvale. The primary
intent of the request was to determine appropriate staffing levels during the City’s contract nego
a
ons with the Sheriff’s Department. Over several weeks, the city manager and staff worked collabora
vely with Riverside County Sheriff’s Department administra on and management to
obtain crime statistics that could be shared with the public on a regular basis.
Upon receiving the data, the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department advised staff that the data provided would be reflec
ve of the previous month, or thirty days behind the current month; and that the report would need to include a disclaimer identifying the data as preliminary and raw.
At the July 26, 2017 mee
ng, City Council recommended that staff add columns reflec ve of felony
and misdemeanor arrests. During the September 26, 2017 mee ng, City Council recommended staff
add traffic viola
ons/cita
ons data and the total calls for service broken down per month. Crime 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
201
sta
s
cs that were released in the
me that passed since the last mee
ng of the City Council are
attached.
Environmental
Crime sta
s
cs are not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
This request has no fiscal impact.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
July 25, 2017: Approved by the Public Safety Commission September 26, 2017: Approved by City Council
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - October 2021 Eastvale Crime Statistics.pdf Attachment 2 - November 2021 Eastvale Crime Statistics.pdf 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
202
City of Eastvale
Crime Statistics
October 2021
Violent Crime Statistics
VIOLENT CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2021 POPULATION = 67,626
OCT
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2020
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUL
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
YEAR
TO
DATE
2021
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2020
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2019
HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 2 3 3
ROBBERY 2 0.03 4 0.06 1 0.01 4 0.06 1 0.01 20 22 25
AGGRAVATED
ASSAULT
2 0.03 5 0.08 2 0.03 2 0.03 7 0.10 45 54 52
ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
TOTAL 4 N/A 9 N/A 3 N/A 6 N/A 9 N/A 68 82 80
YEAR POPULATION TOTAL CALLS FOR
SERVICE/FILE #S
2020 66,413 23,778
2019 66,078 24,587
2018 64,855 28,383
2017 64,613 32,295
2016 63,214 31,234
2015 60,881 26,556
LEGEND
All data is preliminary, pending year end verification by CA-DOJ and FBI.
The numbers presented here are raw statistics based on the information currently in the Records Management System (RMS).
Source of population data: State of California, Department of Finance “Total calls for service/file #s generated” encompass ALL call types inclusive of the ones listed and not listed on this chart.
Year to Date (YTD) is calendar year
TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S GENERATED
YEAR: 2021 POPULATION: 67,626 TOTAL YTD: 20,809
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1,749 1,707 1,880 2,346 2,011 2,277 1,931 2,155 2,116 2,637 Non-Violent Crime Statistics
PROPERTY CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2021 POPULATION = 67,626
OCT
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2020
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUL
2021
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
YEAR
TO
DATE
2021
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2020
YEAR
END
TOTAL
2019
BURGLARY 3 0.04 6 0.09 11 0.16 7 0.10 10 0.15 131 127 150
VEHICLE
THEFT
6 0.09 10 0.15 10 0.15 13 0.19 10 0.15 112 140 118
LARCENY
THEFT
71 1.05 30 0.45 39 0.58 34 0.50 42 0.62 483 557 657
MAIL THEFT 2 0.03 8 0.12 8 0.12 4 0.06 7 0.10 63 88 53
INJURY TCS 10 0.15 7 0.11 13 0.19 13 0.19 10 0.15 108 140 202 FELONY
ARREST
20 0.30 17 0.26 8 0.12 18 0.27 17 0.25 176 159 201
MISDEMEANOR
ARREST
16 0.24 29 0.44 14 0.21 22 0.33 20 0.30 193 305 354
TRAFFIC
CITATIONS
281 4.16 287 4.32 380 5.62 454 6.71 292 4.32 3,266 3,273 3,335 TOTAL 409 N/A 394 N/A 483 N/A 565 N/A 408 N/A 4,532 4,789 5,082 203
▪▪▪▪
204
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.7
January 26, 2022
Opera(ng and Capital Improvement Budge(ng So+ware
Professional Services Agreement
Prepared By:
Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Five-Year So ware Services Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. for budge(ng so ware and related professional services in an amount not-to-exceed $210,775, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
Summary
The budget process is facilitated and managed by the Finance Department. The process relies heavily on linked Microso Excel workbooks and Word documents. Microso Excel does not allow for sharing of linked workbooks, as a result the workbooks cannot be collabora(vely worked on at the same (me by mul(ple users. Due to the inability to share excel workbooks, the current process requires heavy involvement by one single member of the department. This contributes to the inability to efficiently involve all Finance employees in the budget process, as a result department employees are insufficiently trained. Budge(ng so ware allows for a collabora(ve working environment in addi(on to significantly reducing Finance staff hours involved in preparing, collec(ng, managing, analyzing, and balancing budget data. The so ware will also provide a more user-friendly interface for City Departments to use. Finally, the so ware will provide for the complete crea(on of both an online digital and print budget book within the so ware. Currently crea(on of the budget book is the most (me consuming project for both the Finance Department and other departments and only culminates in a printed book.
Background
Accurate and (mely prepara(on of the city's budget. mid-year budget, and quarterly financial 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
205
reports in addi(on to the analysis of non-financial data is cri(cal to successful City opera(ons.
Currently, the budget and financial repor(ng process is cumbersome and (me consuming for Finance and all City departments. The completely manual budget process requires departments to submit budget proposals to Finance via Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and Word documents via email communica(on. This manual process for the transmission and input of financial data vastly increases the probability for errors. Although this process has provided the city with successful budget prepara(on since the city's incorpora(on, it is not the most effec(ve or efficient way to prepare budgets and financial data. Recently, budge(ng and financial repor(ng so ware specific for local government has become available to the market.
The Finance Department spends an es(mated 570 hours each year preparing, forma@ng, reviewing, re-forma@ng, re-working the budget proposals via Excel spreadsheets and Word documents during the annual budget process. Addi(onally, the Finance Department spends approximately 180 hours preparing Quarterly Financial Reports and 130 hours preparing the Mid-Year Budget, for a total of 880 hours annually. Much of this work is completed at the Director and Manager level due to the current financial repor(ng and budge(ng tools at the city's disposal. The 880 hours equals 42% of annual work (me for a full-(me staff member. Through the use of budge(ng so ware, staff es(mates a reduc(on of Finance staff (me from 42% to 20% of a full-(me staff member. Although this creates a 50% reduc(on in (me allocated towards the budget process, a budget savings will not be realized. Instead, affected staff will be available to devote (me to budget analysis and long-term forecas(ng in addi(on to other projects. Procurement of budge(ng so ware will allow more Finance staff to work on the budget process, as the data will now be accessible via a collabora(ve so ware package rather than located within complex and inaccessible spreadsheets and Word documents. This will provide for cross-training opportuni(es, ensuring that ample staff has the skills required to work on important financial repor(ng and budge(ng for the city in addi(on to reducing the calendar days required to complete the budget as multiple staff can devote time to the process.
Currently, staff relies on a combina(on of Microso Excel and Word. These tools have limita(ons in their ability to work collabora(vely and dynamically with other departments and team members.
The current setup does not easily compare or link financial data to performance metrics; the current process lacks quick & flexible filtering; it is difficult to aggregate data from different sources; charts and graphs must be manually updated; and staff spends mul(ple hours forma@ng and reforma@ng data instead of using the (me to analyze the data. Modern, purpose-built so ware will dramatically enhance Finance's ability to build an effective budget.
A er par(cipa(ng in mul(ple demonstra(ons, staff has determined OpenGov best meets the City’s current and future needs in the areas of opera(ng budget prepara(on, capital improvement program planning, personnel budge(ng, financial forecas(ng, and financial repor(ng and transparency. OpenGov is a Redwood City, CA based company founded in 2012 to help public agencies improve the accessibility and transparency of their financial data to the public. Over the last several years, OpenGov has developed tools to allow for opera(ng budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) prepara(on. OpenGov currently serves over 2,200 governments ranging from states, coun(es, and ci(es. Some examples of the California ci(es served by OpenGov are large ci(es such as Santa Monica, Long Beach, San Jose, and San Diego; to mid-size ci(es like Diamond Bar, Glendora, Hayward, Palo Alto, and Redwood City; and many smaller ci(es and towns like Foster City, Alameda, Cupertino, Glendora, and Menlo Park.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
206
The OpenGov plaNorm will allow staff to interact simultaneously by entering and modifying data in one centralized loca(on, rather than sending Excel spreadsheets back and forth via email. The plaNorm will be linked directly to the City’s financial management system, Springbrook, providing (mely and accurate access to cri(cal financial data. Most importantly, this streamlined process minimizes the high poten(al for human error. The main modules that the city will u(lize are as follows:
Communica(ons and Repor(ng – integrates with and aggregates data from a variety of sources both financial and non-financial. In addi(on, OpenGov’s visualiza(on and dashboarding capabili(es allow staff to easily access, visualize, and compare data from several sources all in one place. The so ware creates specific dashboards for different departments or stakeholders so they have ready access to the data they need from different systems and can monitor progress to goals or trends over time.
Stories
Open Town Hall
Reporting
Dashboards
Transparency Portal
Budge(ng and Planning Suite – integrated budge(ng and planning solu(on that has the capacity to aggregate and synchronize both financial and non-financial data. It is intended to streamline and transform the budget process from the ini(al stages of planning and personnel forecas(ng on through final publica(on while enabling collabora(on throughout. The so ware includes mul(-year and personnel forecas(ng, and electronic budget book which links to the financial and non-financial data as appropriate.
Operating Budget
Workforce Planning (personnel)
Capital Improvement Project Budgeting
Online Budget Book
Budget Reporting
In an effort to streamline implementa(on, staff an(cipates par(ally implemen(ng the budge(ng a planning suite and fully u(lizing the online budget book for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget year. Full implementa(on of the budge(ng and planning suite is an(cipated for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 MidYear. implementa(on of the Communica(ons and Repor(ng module will be completed in tandem with the Communications Department, likely in the Spring of 2023.
Per the City’s Municipal Code Sec(on 4.06.080, OpenGov was selected as a sole source provider as the good or service is provided by only one vendor and this vendor has exclusive rights to the good or service. This so ware is the only integrated mul(-tenant so ware-as-a-service solu(on designed specifically for government budge(ng and robust analy(cal repor(ng and transparency. OpenGov is the only manufacturer and distributor of this software.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: 7 | Goal #: 4 Empower staff to innovate for efficiencies; create a culture of innovation.
Fiscal Impact
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
207
The opera(onal, on-going, cost of services is $34,200 annually. There is a non-opera(onal, one- (me, implementa(on fee of $39,775. In an(cipa(on of implemen(ng budget so ware, staff requested adequate budget in the fiscal year 2021-22 budget in account 100-210-6615 to cover the cost of both the operational and non-operational costs in year one.
Year Type
One-Time
Costs
Annual Costs
One Implementation $39,775 $0
One Software 34,200
Two Software 34,200
Three Software 34,200
Four Software 34,200
Five Software 34,200
Total $39,775 $171,000
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Budgeting software has not been considered previously by the City Council.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Scope of Work
Attachment 2 - Software Services Agreement
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
208
Created On: 1/14/2022
Quote Expiration: 1/31/2022 Prepared By: Andrew Kercado Subscription Start Date: Email: [email protected]
2/1/2022 Subscription End Date:
1/31/2027
Contract Term: 60 Months
Customer Information
Customer: Contact Name: Amanda Wells Contact Name: Amanda Wells Bill To/Ship To: Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: (951) 703-4438 (951) 703-4438
Order Details
Billing Frequency: Annual Description: See Billing Table Below Payment Terms: Net Thirty (30) Days
SOFTWARE SERVICES:
Start Date End Date Annual Term Annual Fee
2/1/2022 1/31/2027 5 $34,200.00
Annual Subscription: $34,200.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
Professional Services Total: $39,775.00
Billing Date Amount Due
February 1, 2022 $73,975.00 (Software Services + Professional Services ) February 1, 2023 $34,200.00
February 1, 2024 $34,200.00
February 1, 2025 $34,200.00
February 1, 2026 $34,200.00
OpenGov, Inc.
Signature: Signature:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Product / Service
OpenGov Inc.
PO Box 41340
San Jose, CA 95160
United States
City of Eastvale, CA
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, California 91752
United States
City of Eastvale, CA
Budgeting & Planning
Product / Service Description
OpenGov Deployment Product configuration, setup, and training described in the attached SOW.
Billing Table:
Order Form Legal Terms
Welcome to OpenGov! Thanks for using our Software Services. This Order Form is entered into between OpenGov, Inc., with its principal place of business at 6525 Crown Blvd #41340 San Jose, CA 95160 (“OpenGov”), and you, the entity identified above (“Customer”), as of the Effective Date. This Order Form includes and incorporates the OpenGov Software Services Agreement (“SSA”) attached, or if no such SSA is attached, the SSA available at https://opengov.com/terms-of-service and the applicable Statement of Work (“SOW”) incorporated herein in the event Professional Services are purchased. The Order Form, SSA and SOW shall hereafter be referred to as the "Agreement". Unless otherwise specified above, fees for the Software Services and Professional Services shall be due and payable, in advance, on the Effective Date. By signing this Agreement, Customer acknowledges that it has reviewed, and agrees to be legally bound by, the OpenGov Software Services Agreement. Each party’s acceptance of this Agreement is conditional upon the other’s acceptance of the terms in the Agreement to the exclusion of all other terms. 209
Statement of Work
City of Eastvale, CA
Created by: Ariana Tuckey
Creation Date: 12/08/21
Document Number: DD-02229
Version Number: 1
Overview 2
Preamble 2
Methodology 3
Project Initiation 4
Best Practice Review 4
Configuration 4
Validation 4
Deploy 5
Project Completion 5
Project Schedule 5
Roles and Responsibilities 6
Roles and Responsibilities Matrix 6
Governance 8
Regular Communication Components 8
Commitment to Project Direction and Goals 10
Escalation Process 10
Process 10
Escalation Requirements 10
Documentation 11
General Project Commitments 11
Project Scope 12
OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform 12
OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform Project Deliverables 12 1 210
Project Tasks 12
Initiate 12
Best Practices 13
Configuration 13
Validation 14
Deploy 14
OpenGov Budgeting & Planning 15
Budget & Planning Project Deliverables 15
Project Tasks - Budgeting and Planning 15
Initiate 15
Best Practices 17
Configure 17
Validation 19
Deploy 19
Financial Integration 20
Financial Integration Deliverables 20
Financial Integration Tasks 20
Initiate 20
Configuration 21
Validation 21
Deploy 22
Acceptance 22
Acceptance Process 22
Acceptance Requirements 23
Change Management 23
1. Overview
1.1. Preamble
This Statement of Work (“SOW”) identifies services that OpenGov, Inc. (“OpenGov” or “we”) will perform for City of Eastvale, CA (“Customer” or “you”) pursuant to that order for Professional Services entered into between OpenGov and the Customer (“Order Form”) which references the Software Services Agreement or other applicable agreement entered into by the parties (the “Agreement”).
● Customer’s use of the Professional Services are governed by the Agreement and not this SOW.
● Upon execution of the Order Form or other documentation referencing the SOW, this 2 211
SOW shall be incorporated by reference into the Agreement. ● In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the terms and conditions of this SOW and the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this SOW shall govern with respect to the subject matter of this SOW only. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this SOW shall have the meaning defined in the Agreement. ● This SOW may not be modified or amended except in a written agreement signed by a duly authorized representative of each party.
● openGov will be deployed as is, Customer has access to all functionality available in the current release.
2. Methodology
OpenGov’s deployment methodology, often referred to as the OpenGov Way (“OG Way”), delivers on OpenGov’s mission to power more effective and accountable governments. ’It is an innovative, modern, and iterative approach that leads our customers to successfully deploy our products and help them successfully achieve their vision. The OG Way differentiates itself in the market by its foundation of customer empowerment. We rely on our years of experience working with governments, leading in governments, and leveraging best practices from the public and private sector in order to coach our customers through the change management needed to leverage our best practices and quality software. This methodology requires a degree of focus and engagement to ensure collaboration between both parties to produce the desired results in a timely manner. We look forward to our partnership and can’t wait to show you how The OG Way will improve the way you do business and the services you’re able to provide to your citizens! 3 212
Project Initiation
During project initiation, we will introduce project resources, review the products and services purchased, finalize project timelines, and conduct the kickoff meeting. Both OpenGov and Customer are responsible for assigning their Project Managers for the project. We will hold a planning meeting to review all project documents OpenGov has received to date. We’ll also provide additional worksheets that need to be included. We’ll set-up meetings to finalize the project plan and ensure there is a centralized location for these documents to be stored for collaboration. Lastly, we’ll determine the date for the larger kickoff meeting and discuss the agenda for this critical meeting.
Best Practice Review
● OpenGov will provide your team with access to OG University and OpenGov’s Resource Center so that you can start learning.
● Provided checklists with samples of data and information that we’ll need completed.
We will obtain all data and integration information at this time in our standard format. ● We will review your agency-specific documents to validate your business requirements.
● We will then coach you on our best practices by showing you how our tool works in the most effective manner.
● Based on our best practices review, we’ll make solution recommendations based on our domain expertise.
● We’ll align with your team based on our understanding of your operating processes based on technical requirements and product functionality. ● We’ll review all data and integration requirements. A data map will be mutually agreed upon and signed off on by Customer.
● We'll present a solution document to be mutually agreed upon prior to starting the configuration.
Configuration
● We will set-up the base configuration based on the mutually agreed upon solution document.
● We will mutually configure the use cases based on the mutually agreed upon solution document.
● We will migrate your data based on our mutually agreed upon data map.
Validation
● Review the completed work performed during configuration. 4 213
● The appropriate members of the Customer project team will confirm that the solution has been configured correctly based on the solution and data mapping documents by testing the use of the solution.
● Training will be provided based on the selected package, or as set forth herein. ● Any items that were configured or migrated incorrectly based on the data map and solution document will be tracked via an issue log. We will work with your team to identify deployment critical issues that will be worked out prior to launch. If the item is not included in the mutually agreed upon data map and solution document, a mutually agreed upon change order will be discussed as defined in Section 10 Change Management of this SOW.
● The exit criteria for this phase is the sign off by the Customer’s Project Manager of the configuration based on the mutually agreed upon solution and data map as defined in Section 9 Acceptance of this SOW.
Deploy
● The solution is usable by Customer.
Project Completion
● Customer is sent a project acceptance form to sign as defined in Section 9 Acceptance of this SOW.
● Customer will be asked to respond to a brief survey to provide feedback about the experience.
● Customer is introduced to Customer Support and educated on how to engage with customer support based on Customer’s procured package.
3. Project Schedule
OpenGov will schedule resources for this project upon signature of the order form. Unless specifically noted, the OpenGov assigned project manager (as identified below or such alternate designated by OpenGov, the “OpenGov Project Manager”) will work with Customer Project Manager to develop the project schedule for all requested deliverables under this SOW. OpenGov reserves the right to adjust the schedule based on the availability of OpenGov resources and/or Customer resources, and the timeliness of deliverables provided by the Customer.
5 214
4. Roles and Responsibilities
4.1. Roles and Responsibilities Matrix
OpenGov
Role Role Description
Executive Sponsor
(“ES”)
Responsible for ensuring alignment on project value proposition and vision. Escalation point for Customer Executive Sponsor to mitigate any risks that the project team cannot resolve. Executive Sponsor attends monthly (or other frequency) executive
meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status and closure summary.
Project Manager
(“PM”)
Responsible for the delivery of the professional services based upon the agreed upon contract and SOW within the budgeted hours and timeframe. Ensures the project is properly forecasted, assigns tasks/resources, and tracks toward project completion.
Holds executive steering committee meetings and/or quarterly business reviews as appropriate to ensure project issues are properly escalated and success is achieved. Facilitates the transition to support.
Analyst (“IA”) Responsible for helping Customer configure OpenGov’s product suites as assigned. The Analyst is the primary consultant, guiding Customer through configuration working sessions to put together successful workflows.
Subject Matter
Expert (“SME”)
OpenGov Subject Matter Experts (“SMEs”) will engage in
strategy, design, and execution discussions internally and with Customer during the deployment. The SME has a specific area of expertise, and depending on the scope of the project more than one SME may engage. The SME will not be on all working
sessions, but will be involved per the direction of the OpenGov Project Manager.
Integration Engineer
(“IE”)
Responsible for migrations, conversions, and integrations as assigned. Responsible for providing clear direction on
specifications to ensure proper delivery of migration,
conversions, and integrations. Clear data mapping and data validation to be provided with customer sign-offs obtained by the OpenGov Project Manager.
Account Executive The Account Executive is responsible for the sales cycle. Aligning 6 215
(“AE”) on program vision, value proposition, and contract terms. The Account Executive will facilitate project kickoff along with the OpenGov Project Manager. The Account Executive will be
engaged with the customer throughout their journey with OpenGov, post-deployment and beyond.
Customer Manager
(“CM”)
The Customer Manager (“CM”) is the primary customer
relationship holder post-Deploy. The “Air Traffic Controller” or “Quarterback” of OpenGov resources with focus on long term success of Customer’s partnership with OpenGov. The CM will engage with Customer to discuss adoption strategy and conduct periodic reviews to ensure Customer’s key stakeholders
understand all OpenGov offerings and how they align to key Customer priorities. The CM will be introduced at deployment kick-off, but will not be an active participant in deployment working sessions. As the deployment approaches closure, the CM's engagement will ramp-up, and the OpenGov Project
Manager to CM meeting with Customer will occur prior to Project Completion.
Customer
Role Role Description
Budget Owner (“BO”) The Customer Budget Owner commits the funds to the project deployment, assesses the value to the cost (ROI), and approves changes orders. In some cases, the Budget Owner and Executive Sponsor are the same person.
Executive Sponsor
(“ES”)
Responsible for ensuring Customer team is aligned to core project value proposition and goals. Able to intervene if the project goes off track, and has ability to make decisions on timeline and budget when decisions are stalled. The Executive Sponsor is not expected to regularly attend deployment working sessions. Executive Sponsors, attend monthly (or other
frequency) executive meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status and closure summary.
Project Manager
(“PM”)
Serves as the primary contact for OpenGov Project Initiation, Best Practice Review, Configuration, Validation, Deploy, Project Completion. Coordinates meetings and schedules. Controls communication between the Customer and OpenGov project
teams.
Project Lead (“PL”) Is an internal SME in the functional area of deployment. Attends working sessions, trainings, and responsible for reviewing 7 216
configurations. Primary OpenGov counterpart will be the Analyst.
Data and
SystemsLead (“DSL”)
Responsible for mapping out data infrastructure and validating migration, conversion, integration requirements. Someone who is able to connect OpenGov team with any of Customer’s
third-party data sources and vendors as needed to fulfill SOW requirements.
5. Governance
Project Governance provides the foundation and framework to manage deployments by assessing progress and addressing questions and challenges during the course of deployment. OpenGov follows three guiding principles for governance to maximize the deployment value with our customers:
● Regular communication aligned to the agreed upon project plan and timing will occur. OpenGov expects our customers to raise questions or concerns as soon as they arise. OpenGov will do the same, as we can only address items when known. ● Executive involvement is expected from both OpenGov and Customer. Not only may Executives be called upon to clarify expectations and/or confusion, but also to steer strategic items to maximize the value through the deployment. ● Commitment to the direction outlined in this SOW and critical assessment change orders to ensure they drive value.
5.1. Regular Communication Components
Meeting
Frequency Purpose Participants
OpenGov Customer
Quarterly
Management
Review
(“QMR”)
Engagement
Review
Quarterly Overview of
Program Status,
Value Realization,
trends, savings
reports, program
improvement,
technology, and
discuss program
adjustments
PM, ES,
others as
necessary
PM, PL,
ES, others
as
necessary
8 217
Statement
Committee
Bi-Annually Review of
milestones per
commercial
agreement, review
budget and fiscal
matters.
Discuss strategic
direction from
deployment,
alignment of
OpenGov with
Customer’s 3-year
roadmap, evaluate
potential shift in
strategy and
impact to
relationship
PM, ES,
AE, CM
PM, BO.
ES
Executive Sponsor Meeting Monthly /
Bi-Monthly
Discuss
deployment:
- Strategic
impacts: timing,
scope, process
- Value prop
changes,
confusion
- Project specific:
items that need
guidance, support
and/or clarity
PM, ES,
plus
others as
necessary
PM, ES,
plus
others as
necessary
Weekly Deployment Updates Weekly Summary of
project actions
against project
plan.
Risks and
achievements
highlighted in
addition to asks of
leadership.
Project
Team +
ES(s)
Project
Team +
ES(s)
9 218
5.2. Commitment to Project Direction and Goals
This SOW is the direction agreed upon by Customer and OpenGov. Transparency of the plan is paramount for our Customers to attain the value the SOW or any subsequent change order outlines.
Should direction of the deployment become disconnected, OpenGov and Customer Project Managers will outline the gaps as they understand them and communicate the gaps to their respective Executive Sponsor(s) (or Project Teams) for discussion and resolution.
The communication path for this engagement will be outlined in the kick off meeting, documenting both phone numbers and email. The general path is:
OpenGov Project Manager → Professional Services Sr. Manager / SVP → Executive Sponsor
6. Escalation Process
The purpose of this section is to define the escalation process, should it be needed, to support closing issues that are raised, discussed to move forward with the deployment.
OpenGov and Customer agree to raise concerns and follow the escalation process, resource responsibility, and documentation.
6.1. Process
● Identification of an issue impeding deployment progress, outcome or capturing the value proposition, that is not acceptable.
● Customer or OpenGov Project Manager summarizes the problem statement and impasse.
● Customer and OpenGov Project Managers will outline solution, acceptance or schedule Executive review in accordance with SLA as defined in Section 7 General Project Assumptions.
● Resolution will be documented and signed off following Executive review in accordance with SLA as defined in Section 7 General Project Assumptions.
6.2. Escalation Requirements
● OpenGov and Customer Project Managers will summarize the impasse and recommendation to present at scheduled or ad hoc executive meetings. Unless otherwise noted in this SOW, Customer Project Manager can approve how hours are used, but not where funding is required.
10 219
● Executive Sponsors attend monthly (or other frequency) executive meetings to review deployment status, documented issue list, status, and closure summary. ● Steering Committees, where applicable, will be the arbitrator to direction and issue closure. Unless otherwise noted in this SOW, the Customer Executive Sponsor must approve change orders that result in additional cost.
● Customer or OpenGov Subject Matter Experts may be requested to provide input to the issue and assist in closure. Both Customer and OpenGov will make best effort to enable those Subject Matter Experts to be available and participate.
6.3. Documentation
● Issue Escalation: Problem Statement with clear impact to the deployment and/or engagement.
● Acceptance Document: Which will include any change order(s) or other process adjustments required and summary of the resolution.
● Notes from Project Meetings, Executive Reviews, and Steering Committee meetings, as appropriate.
7. General Project Commitments
OpenGov is excited to work with Customer on the implementation of our OpenGov ERP Cloud. In order to ensure we are able to meet the project timeline and ensure Customer is successful in this implementation, OpenGov asks that Customer abide by the General Assumptions detailed in this SOW.
● This SOW is limited to the Implementation of the OpenGov Cloud as defined in the Project Scope. Any additional services or support will be considered out of scope.
● Customer will commit and provide access to all necessary stakeholders and subject matter experts, and other key parties whose roles are defined in Section 4.1, necessary to the successful implementation of the OpenGov ERP Cloud as defined in this SOW.
● Customer is responsible for internal change management associated with the purchase of new software.
● Response Protocol
○ OpenGov and Customer commit to responding to inquiries, updates, or any other project-related matters in no more than 10 business days throughout the course of this project. If Customer is delayed in its response, Customer acknowledges that: a) the delay may impact the project schedule; and b) any fees for Professional Services due to OpenGov after such delay shall become due and OpenGov may invoice Customer for such prepayment.
11 220
○ As set forth in Section 6.1(e) of the Agreement, if extended delays in Customer responsiveness are encountered, OpenGov may opt to put the project into an "On Hold" status, which includes causing OpenGov to stop or cause to be stopped the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer, until the Customer has fulfilled its obligations set forth in the On Hold Notice as described in the Agreement.
○ The Professional Services will be provided during regular business hours (8am to 6pm Pacific Time) Monday through Friday (holidays excluded).
● SOW Expiration:
○ This SOW is valid for up to 90 days from the Creation Date, or as agreed to in writing by OpenGov and Customer.
8. Project Scope
8.1. OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform
8.1.1. OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform Project Deliverables
Deliverable Description
OpenGov
Reporting &
Transparency
Platform
Cloud based Reporting & Transparency Platform that includes:
● Stories
● Open Town Hall
● Reporting
● Dashboards
● Transparency Portal
8.1.2. Project Tasks
The tasks listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the OpenGov Reporting & Transparency Platform implementation.
8.1.2.1. Initiate
Functionality Description
Provisioning
R&T Platform
OpenGov will provision Customer’s OpenGov entity and verify Customer has access to all purchased modules.
12 221
OpenGov
University
Platform
Training
OpenGov will provide access to OpenGov University online training courses intended to teach users on the basics of the Reporting & Transparency Platform.
Stories and
Open Town
Hall Examples
OpenGov will build out an example of a Story:
● One standard story based on available templates in OpenGov.
OpenGov will build out an example of a topic in Open Town Hall.
Initial Data
Migration
OpenGov will upload any applicable datasets to the OpenGov Platform. ● Base Budget File
● Historical Budget and Transactions Files, including beginning balances
● Budget Reference Year data files
OpenGov will accept flat files such as CSV, Text, and/or Excel
8.1.2.2. Best Practices
Functionality Description
Overview of
Best Practice
OpenGov assesses and identifies how best to configure and map data to ensure success based on materials provided by Customer.
Stories and
Open Town
Hall Review
The Implementation Analyst will conduct a review of the examples created.
Solution
Document
OpenGov will present a solution document to be mutually agreed upon prior to beginning configuration.
8.1.2.3. Configuration
Functionality Description
Chart of
Accounts
OpenGov will review and give feedback on Customer’s general ledger chart of accounts
OpenGov will provide a functional build of the proposed OpenGov Chart of Accounts, and gain sign off on acceptance from Customer.
OpenGov will configure OpenGov Chart of Accounts in OpenGov system
OpenGov
Reports
OpenGov will:
● Set up 3 OpenGov reports (Annual, Budget to Actuals, and 13 222
Transactions)
8.1.2.4. Validation
Functionality Description
Chart of
Accounts
Once built in OpenGov system, Customer will validate and sign off of transformed Chart of Accounts
Data Customer will validate and sign off on the datasets uploaded as part of the implementation.
8.1.2.5. Deploy
Functionality Description
Training
Stories
OpenGov will review configured story and train Customer on how to:
● Create new stories
● Update/Maintain current stories
● Publish internally and externally
Training Open
Town Hall
OpenGov will present configured Open Town Hall site and theme.
OpenGov will train Customer on Open Town Hall functionality Training
OpenGov
Reports
OpenGov will review configured OpenGov reports.
OpenGov will train Customer on report:
● Configuration
● Update/Maintenance
● Publishing internally and externally
Training
Dashboards
OpenGov will review configured Dashboards
OpenGov will train Customer on Dashboard:
● Configuration
● Update/Maintenance
● Publishing internally and externally
Platform
Training
OpenGov will review configured COA and uploaded data.
OpenGov will train Customer on Platform maintenance::
● Users
● Uploading data
● Maintaining COA
14 223
Sign Off Customer will sign off that they have:
● Configured Story
● Configured Open Town Hall
● Configured OpenGov reports
● Been trained on Stories, Open Town Hall, OpenGov reports
8.2. OpenGov Budgeting & Planning
8.2.1. Budget & Planning Project Deliverables
Functionality Description
OpenGov
Budgeting &
Planning Suite
Budgeting & Planning Suite, includes:
● Operating Budget
● Workforce Planning
● Capital Improvement Project Budgeting
● Online Budget Book
● Budget Reporting
8.2.2. Project Tasks - Budgeting and Planning
The tasks and responsibilities listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the OpenGov Budgeting and Planning Suite implementation.
8.2.2.1. Initiate
Functionality Description
Documentation
Receipt
Customer to provide OpenGov:
● Budget export
● Examples of the documentation currently provided to
department,
● Budget schedule,
● Management budget reports example
OpenGov
University
Budget
Training
During the initial phase, OpenGov will provide system training to administrators.
Training will include:
● How to create
○ a budget
15 224
○ a proposal
○ a worksheet
○ add a line item
○ reselect line items
○ submit a budget
● Reporting overview
● Stories overview
● Open Town Hall overview
● Workforce Planning Overview
Budget and
Workforce
Solution
Examples
OpenGov will build out examples of best practices for budgeting solutions:
Operating
● 2 budget instances in OpenGov
● 2 proposals for each budget instance (Traditional and OpenGov) ● 3 budget reports
○ Operating Budget Development
○ Operating Budget Details
○ Operating Budget Categories
● 1 budget story for review
Capital
● 1 budget instances in OpenGov
● 2 proposals
● 3 budget reports
○ Capital Budget Development
○ Capital Budget Details
○ Capital Budget Categories
● 1 capital story for review
Workforce Planning Shell
● 4 Standard cost elements
○ Wages
○ Insurance
○ Retirement
○ Taxes
Online Budget
Book Examples
OpenGov will build out:
● Look and feel of Online Budget Book
● Best practice templates for:
○ Table of Contents
○ Budget message
○ Introduction
○ Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions
○ Budget Summary
16 225
○ Departmental Information
○ Debt
8.2.2.2. Best Practices
Functionality Description
Overview of
Best Practice
OpenGov assesses and identifies how best to configure and map data to ensure success based on materials provided by Customer.
Budget and
Workforce
Solution
The Implementation Analyst will conduct a review of the examples created and work with the customer to confirm a budget format on which to move forward.
Online Budget
Book Solution
The Implementation Analyst will conduct review of Online Budget Book templates and work with Customer to confirm format and approach.
Solution
Document
OpenGov will present a solution document to be mutually agreed upon prior to beginning configuration.
8.2.2.3. Configure
Functionality Description
Base Budget
File
OpenGov will configure and upload Customer’s base budget file into OpenGov.
Budget
Configuration
Based on the Review and Confirmation phase OpenGov OpenGov will set up Customer’s preferred budget format:
Operating
● 1 Budget instance
● 2 Proposals (Department)
● Corresponding worksheets (single, fund, division, or function) ● 1 standard budget Story template
Capital
● 1 Budget instance
● 2 Proposals (Department or Project)
● Corresponding worksheets (single, fund, division, or function) ● 1 standard capital Story template
Based on the review of the Workforce Planning Shell and with the 17 226
guidance of the Implementation Analyst, Customer will:
● Buildout remaining cost elements
● Populate position template
● Validate Workforce calculation
Budget
Configuration
Working
Sessions
OpenGov will hold working sessions between the Implementation Analyst and Customer for the purpose of validating, reviewing, and iterating upon draft budget instances. Session will focus on:
● Set up
● Structure
● Workflow
● User access
Administrator
Budget
Management
Training
OpenGov will provide 1, 60-Minute training sessions to enable Customer’s Budget Administrators to manage and maintain their OpenGov budgets including:
● User access
● Approval workflow
● Cloning
● Phases
● Proposal status
Dataset and
View
Configuration
OpenGov will set up 1 export and dataset view to enable budget reports Budget
Report(s)
OpenGov will set up 8 budget reports to include:
Operating
● Operating Budget Milestones
● Operating Budget Development
● Operating Budget Details
● Operating Budget Categories
Capital
● Capital Budget Development
● Capital Budget Details
● Capital Budget Categories
● Capital Plan Report
Budget
Exports and
Reporting
Training
OpenGov will provide 1, 60-Minute training sessions to enable Customer to own, manage and maintain their OpenGov Budget Data and Reports including:
● Exports
● Dataset views
18 227
● Reports
Online Budget
Book
Configuration
and Training
Session
OpenGov will setup 3 OpenGov standard Online Budget Book templates chosen from examples defined above, including 1 completed story from 1 template
● Administrator training
○ One 60-Minute session for training:
■ Using and Copying Templates
■ How Datasets and Reports work in Stories
■ How the Online Budget Book works with
Transparency Portal
■ Preparing for updating and ongoing use
● OpenGov will provide working sessions for OpenGov to consult with Customer on Online Budget Book, scheduled as needed. (Not to exceed more than 10 sessions unless agreed upon by openGov Project Manager and Customer.)
Customer administrators will set up additional project story shells and corresponding project users, and admins/users will add content
8.2.2.4. Validation
Functionality Description
Validation of
Configured
Budgets
The OpenGov Project Manager and Analyst will confirm with Customer’s Project Lead that all budget proposals are configured properly based on the agreed upon format.
8.2.2.5. Deploy
Functionality Description
Internal
Budget User
Training
OpenGov will provide 1, 60-Minute training sessions to enable Customer’s internal users to understand budgeting requirements.
Sign Off Customer will provide written sign off that all Budgets and reports have been configured based on agreed upon formats.
19 228
8.3. Financial Integration
8.3.1. Financial Integration Deliverables
Functionality Description
Financial
Integration
OpenGov will work with Customer’s IT Staff and Project Team to setup a one way data integration from Springbrook to OpenGov
8.3.2. Financial Integration Tasks
The tasks listed below are required for OpenGov and Customer to successfully complete the Financial Integrations with OpenGov.
8.3.2.1. Initiate
Functionality Description
Solution
Review
OpenGov will review the proposed solution with Customer ● Functionalities to be Integrated
○ Actuals (Revenue and Expenses)
○ Budget
● Integration Approach
○ Database Connect / Agent Install
○ SFTP (File Transfer)
● OpenGov Assumes:
○ The data will be linked to the Customer’s COA.
○ Integration is unidirectional from the Customer’s
accounting software into OpenGov.
Data Files
[SFTP]
Customer will provide the data in the required format associated with the functionalities
● Data Files for Historical Years
● Data Files for Current Year
● Automate the file transfers into the OpenGov SFTP location Data Analysis OpenGov will perform the data analysis
● To align with the required functionalities
● To align with the COA
20 229
8.3.2.2. Configuration
Functionality Description
Integration
Setup
OpenGov will perform the following
● Installation of Agent (Database Integrations)
● Database View Deployment ( Database Integrations)
● SFTP Setup (SFTP Data Migrations)
● Sample File Format (SFTP Data Migrations)
● OpenGov Assumes:
○ OpenGov will require assistance from Customer to
understand source system specific customizations and
configurations when building the data extract. When
OpenGov is not able to access or extract data as per
requirements, Customer should provide the data files in CSV format into OpenGov FTP Location.
○ When the source accounting software is hosted by a third party vendor on behalf of Customer, Customer is
responsible for brokering OpenGov’s access to
Customer’s data residing at the vendor’s premises in
accordance with OpenGov’s data formatting
requirements.
Configuration
and Testing
OpenGov will perform the Configuration to
● Extract, Transform (when required) and load the data
● Build Reports for the required functionalities
● Initial validation of data
8.3.2.3. Validation
Functionality Description
Data Validation OpenGov team to work with Customer to
● Validate the historical data
● Validate the current year data
● OpenGov Assumes:
○ Customer will provide data to validate against (PDF
Export). Data should be received prior to the start of the integration.
21 230
○ OpenGov will perform the validation for data accuracy for the Integration, working jointly with Customer team to
approve the Financial Integration data.
8.3.2.4. Deploy
Functionality Description
Deployment
and Wrap Up
OpenGov will perform the Configuration to
● Schedule the current year data load
● Train the administrators
● Monitor the data load
Sign Off Customer will complete OpenGov-provided sign off document acknowledging
● Accuracy of the data for historical years and current year associated with the functionalities
● Accuracy Reports associated with the functionalities
● Adequately trained on the Integration Functionalities
9. Acceptance
9.1. Acceptance Process
All Deliverables require acceptance from the Customer Project Manager(s) following the completion of Deliverables and upon Project Closure. Customer is responsible for conducting any additional review or testing of such Deliverable pursuant to any applicable mutually agreed upon acceptance criteria agreed upon by the parties for such Deliverable.
Upon completion of these phases, the OpenGov Project Manager shall notify the Customer Project Manager(s) and provide the necessary documents for review and sign off.
The following process will be used for accepting or acknowledging Deliverables and Project Closure:
● OpenGov shall submit the completed Deliverables to Customer to review or test against the applicable acceptance criteria. Customer shall notify OpenGov promptly of its acceptance or rejection in accordance with the agreed upon acceptance criteria.
22 231
● Customer must accept all Deliverables that meet the applicable acceptance criteria.
OpenGov Project Manager will provide the Customer Project Manager with the OpenGov Acceptance form to sign off on the Deliverable and project. Once all Deliverables required to meet a particular phase have been accepted or are deemed accepted, the phase shall be deemed complete.
● Upon completion of the phase or project, OpenGov allows Customer 10 business days to communicate that the particular Deliverable(s) does not meet Customer’s requirements. Failure to communicate that the particular Deliverable(s) does not meet Customer’s requirements will be deemed as acceptance and any further work provided to remedy Customer’s complaint might incur additional cost. ● Customer shall provide to OpenGov a written notice detailing the reasons for rejection and the nature of the failure to meet the acceptance criteria. OpenGov shall make best effort to revise the non-conforming Deliverable(s) to meet the acceptance criteria and re-submit it to Customer for further review and testing. ● If the acceptance form is not received in accordance with Section 7 General Project Assumptions, the project phase and/or project will be considered accepted and automatically closed.
9.2. Acceptance Requirements
● All acceptance milestones and associated review periods will be tracked on the project plan.
● The Customer Project Manager will have decision authority to approve/reject all project Deliverables, Phase Acceptance and Project Acceptance. ● Any open issues shall receive a response in accordance with Section 7 General Assumptions of this SOW following the Validation Acceptance review, or as mutually agreed upon between the parties, for resolution prior to advancing on in the project. ● Both OpenGov and Customer recognize that failure to complete tasks and respond to open issues may have a negative impact on the project. ● For any tasks not yet complete, OpenGov and/or Customer will provide sufficient resources to expedite completion of tasks to prevent negatively impacting the project.
10. Change Management
This SOW and related efforts are based on the information provided and gathered by OpenGov. Customer acknowledges that changes to the scope may require additional effort or time, resulting in additional cost. Any change to scope must be agreed to in writing or 23 232
email, by both Customer and OpenGov, and documented as such via a:
● Change Order - Work that is added to or deleted from the original scope of this SOW.
Depending on the magnitude of the change, it may or may not alter the original contract amount or completion date and be paid for by Customer. Changes might include:
○ Timeline for completion
○ Sign off process
○ Cost of change and Invoice timing
○ Signed by OpenGov and Customer Executives approving funds.
Change documentation will be mutually agreed upon as defined in Section 7 General Assumptions of this SOW. Should that not occur, the change will be added to the next Executive Sponsor agenda for closure.
Example of changes that might arise during a deployment:
● Amending the SOW to correct an error.
● Extension of work as the complexity identified exceeds what was expected by Customer or OpenGov.
● Change in type of OpenGov resources to support the SOW. 24 233
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Software Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into by OpenGov, Inc., a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 6525 Crown Blvd #41340, San Jose, CA 95160 (“OpenGov”) and the customer listed on the signature block below (“Customer”), as of the date of last signature below (the “Effective Date”). This Agreement sets forth the terms under which Customer will be permitted to use OpenGov’s hosted software services.
1. DEFINITIONS
“Customer Data” means data that is provided by Customer to OpenGov pursuant to this Agreement (for example, by email or through Customer’s software systems of record). Customer Data shall not include any confidential personally identifiable information.
“Documentation” means the documentation for the Software Services at the Customer Resource Center page found at https://opengov.zendesk.com.
“Feedback” means suggestions, comments, improvements, ideas, or other feedback or materials regarding the Software Services provided by Customer to OpenGov, including feedback provided through online developer community forums.
“Initial Term” means the initial license term specified in number of years on the Order Form, commencing on the Effective Date.
“Intellectual Property Rights” means all intellectual property rights including all past, present, and future rights associated with works of authorship, including exclusive exploitation rights, copyrights, and moral rights, trademark and trade name rights and similar rights, trade secret rights, patent rights, and any other proprietary rights in intellectual property of every kind and nature.
“Order Form” means OpenGov’s Software Services order form that: (a) specifies the Software Services provided by OpenGov; (b) references this Agreement; and (c) is signed by authorized representatives of both parties.
“Renewal Term” means each additional renewal period, which shall be for a period of equal duration as the Initial Term, for which this Agreement is extended pursuant to Section 7.2.
2. SOFTWARE SERVICES, SUPPORT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2.1 Software Services. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OpenGov will use commercially reasonable efforts to perform the software services identified in the applicable Order Form entered into by OpenGov and Customer (“Software Services”).
2.2 Support & Service Levels. Customer support is available by email to [email protected] or by using the chat messaging functionality of the Software Services, both of which are available during OpenGov’s standard business hours. Customer may report issues any time. However, OpenGov will address issues during business hours. OpenGov will provide support for the Software Services in accordance with the Support and Software Service Levels found at https://opengov.com/service-sla, as long as Customer is entitled to receive support under the applicable Order Form and this Agreement.
2.3 Professional Services.
(a) If OpenGov or its authorized independent contractors provides professional services to Customer, such as implementation services, then these professional services will be described in a statement of work (“SOW”) agreed to by the parties (the “Professional Services”). Unless otherwise specified in the SOW, any pre-paid Professional Services Fees must be utilized within one (1) year from the Effective Date. Any unused pre-paid Professional Services Fees shall be forfeited.
(b) Unless the SOW provides otherwise, all reasonable travel expenses, pre-approved by Customer and incurred by OpenGov in performing the professional services will be reimbursed by Customer. Travel expenses 234
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
include cost of coach airfare travel round trip from the individual’s location to Customer's location, reasonable hotel accommodations, ground transportation and meals.
3. RESTRICTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
3.1 Restrictions. Customer may not use the Software Services in any manner or for any purpose other than as expressly permitted by the Agreement. Customer shall not, and shall not permit or enable any third party to: (a) use or access any of the Software Services to build a competitive product or service; (b) modify, disassemble, decompile, reverse engineer or otherwise make any derivative use of the Software Services (except to the extent applicable laws specifically prohibit such restriction); (c) sell, license, rent, lease, assign, distribute, display, host, disclose, outsource, copy or otherwise commercially exploit the Software Services; (d) perform or disclose any benchmarking or performance testing of the Software Services; (e) remove any proprietary notices included with the Software Services; (f) use the Software Services in violation of applicable law; or (g) transfer any confidential personally identifiable information to OpenGov or the Software Services platform.
3.2 Responsibilities. Customer shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining computers and third party software systems of record (such as Customer’s ERP systems) needed to connect to, access or otherwise use the Software Services. Customer also shall be responsible for: (a) ensuring that such equipment is compatible with the Software Services, (b) maintaining the security of such equipment, user accounts, passwords and files, and (c) all uses of Customer user accounts by any party other than OpenGov.
4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; LICENSE GRANTS; ACCESS TO CUSTOMER DATA
4.1 Software Services. OpenGov retains all right, title, and interest in the Software Services and all Intellectual Property Rights in the Software Services. The look and feel of the Software Services, including any custom fonts, graphics and button icons, are the property of OpenGov and Customer may not copy, imitate, or use them, in whole or in part, without OpenGov’s prior written consent. Subject to Customer’s obligations under this Agreement, OpenGov hereby grants to Customer a non-exclusive, royalty-free license during the Term to use the Software Services.
4.2 Customer Data. Customer retains all right, title, and interest in the Customer Data and all Intellectual Property Rights therein. Customer hereby grants to OpenGov a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to, and permit its partners (which include, without limitation the hosting providers of the Software Services) to, use, store, edit and reformat the Customer Data, and to use Customer Data for purposes of sales, marketing, business development, product enhancement, customer service, or for analyzing such data and publicly disclosing such analysis (“Insights”), provided that in all such uses Customer Data is rendered anonymous such that Customer is no longer identifiable.
4.3 Access to Customer Data. Customer may download the Customer Data from the Software Services at any time during the Term, other than during routine software maintenance periods. OpenGov has no obligation to return Customer Data to Customer.
4.4 Feedback. Customer hereby grants to OpenGov a non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to use and incorporate into the Software Services and Documentation Customer’s Feedback.
OpenGov will exclusively own any improvements or modifications to the Software Services and Documentation based on or derived from any of Customer’s Feedback including all Intellectual Property Rights in and to the improvements and modifications.
5. CONFIDENTIALITY
5.1 Each party (the “Receiving Party”) agrees not to disclose any Confidential Information of the other party (the “Disclosing Party”) without the Disclosing Party’s prior written consent, except as provided below. The Receiving Party further agrees: (a) to use and disclose the Confidential Information only in connection with this Agreement; and (b) to protect such Confidential Information using the measures that Receiving Party employs with respect to its own Confidential Information of a similar nature, but in no event with less than reasonable care. Notwithstanding the above, the Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information to the extent required by law or court order, provided that prior written notice of such required disclosure and an opportunity to oppose or limit disclosure is given to the Disclosing Party.
235
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
5.2 “Confidential Information" means all confidential business, technical, and financial information of the disclosing party that is marked as “Confidential” or an equivalent designation or that should reasonably be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and/or the circumstances surrounding the disclosure (including the terms of the applicable Software Agreement). OpenGov’s Confidential Information includes, without limitation, the software underlying the Software Services and all Documentation.
5.3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, “Confidential Information” does not include: (a) “Public Data,” which is data that the Customer has previously released to the public, would be required to release to the public, upon request, according to applicable federal, state, or local public records laws, or Customer requests OpenGov make available to the public in conjunction with the Software Services. Confidential Information does not include (b) information that has become publicly known through no breach by the receiving party; (c) information that was rightfully received by the Receiving Party from a third party without restriction on use or disclosure; or (d) information independently developed by the Receiving Party without access to the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information.
6. PAYMENT OF FEES
6.1 Fees; Invoicing; Payment; Expenses.
(a) Fees. The fees for the Software Services for the Initial Term and any Renewal Term (“Software Services Fees”) and the fees for Professional Services (“Professional Services Fees”) are set forth in the applicable Order Form. Software Services Fees and Professional Services Fees shall hereafter be referred to as “Fees”. Except to the extent otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement or in an Order Form, (i) all obligations to pay Fees are noncancelable and all payments are non-refundable, (ii) Customer must pay all Fees due under all Order Forms and SOW within thirty (30) days after Customer receives each invoice (invoices are deemed received when OpenGov emails them to Customer’s designated billing contact); (iii) the Software Service Fee shall be due annually in advance, and (iv) Customer must make all payments without setoffs, withholdings or deductions of any kind. (b) Annual Software Maintenance Price Adjustment. OpenGov shall increase the Fees payable for the Software Services during any Renewal Term by 5% each year of the Renewal Term. (c) Invoicing and Payment. OpenGov will invoice the Customer according to the Billing Frequency listed on the Order Form. Customer shall pay all invoices according to the Payment Terms listed on the Order Form. (d) Travel Expenses. Unless the SOW provides otherwise, OpenGov will invoice Customer for travel expenses, pre-approved by the Customer, incurred in connection with each SOW as they are incurred. Customer shall pay all such valid invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice. Each invoice shall include receipts for the travel expenses listed on the invoice.
(e) Customer Delays; On Hold Fee.
I. On Hold Notice. Excluding delays caused by Force Majeure as described in Section 10.5, if OpenGov determines that Customer’s personnel or contractors are not completing Customer’s responsibilities described in the applicable SOW timely or accurately, OpenGov shall promptly, but in no event more than thirty (30) days from the date of such determination deliver to Customer a notice (an “On Hold Notice”) that (A) designates the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer as “On Hold”, (B) detail Customer’s obligations and responsibilities necessary for OpenGov to continue performing the Professional Services, and (C) specify the Customer shall be invoiced for lost time in production (e.g. delayed or lost revenue resulting from rescheduling work on other projects, delay in receiving milestone payments from Customer, equipment, hosting providers and human resources idle) for a fee equal to 10% of the first year Software Service Fee (the “On Hold Fee”).
II. Effects of On Hold Notice. Upon issuing an On Hold Notice, OpenGov shall be entitled, without penalty, to (A) reallocate resources otherwise reserved for the performance of the Professional Services, and (B) stop or caused to be stopped the Professional Services to be provided to the Customer until the Customer has fulfilled its obligations as set forth in the On Hold Notice. OpenGov shall remove the “On Hold” status, only upon Customer’s fulfillment of its obligations set out in the On Hold Notice, including payment of the On Hold 236
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
Fee. Upon Customer’s fulfillment of its obligations in the On Hold Notice, OpenGov may, in its sole discretion, extend the timeline to complete certain Professional Services up to six (6) weeks, depending on the availability of qualified team resources (OpenGov cannot guarantee that these team resources will be the same as those who were working on the project prior to it being placed On Hold). OpenGov shall bear no liability or otherwise be responsible for delays in the provision of the Professional Services occasioned by Customer’s failure to complete Customer’s responsibilities or adhere to a Customer schedule which were brought to the attention of the Customer on a timely basis, unless such delays result, directly or indirectly from the failure of OpenGov or its authorized independent contractors to perform the Professional Services in accordance with this Agreement or applicable SOW.
6.2 Consequences of Non-Payment. If Customer fails to make any payments required under any Order Form or SOW, then in addition to any other rights OpenGov may have under this Agreement or applicable law, (a) Customer will owe late interest penalty of 1.5% of the outstanding balance per month, or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is lower and (b) If Customer’s account remains delinquent (with respect to payment of a valid invoice) for thirty (30) days after receipt of a delinquency notice from OpenGov, which may be provided via email to Customer’s designated billing contact, OpenGov may temporarily suspend Customer’s access to the Software Service for up to ninety (90) days to pursue good faith negotiations before pursuing termination in accordance with Section 7. Customer will continue to incur and owe all applicable Fees irrespective of any such Service suspension based on such Customer delinquency.
6.3 Taxes. All Fees under this Agreement are exclusive of any applicable sales, value-added, use or other taxes (“Sales Taxes”). Customer is solely responsible for any and all Sales Taxes, not including taxes based solely on OpenGov’s net income. If any Sales Taxes related to the Fees under this Agreement are found at any time to be payable, the amount may be billed by OpenGov to, and shall be paid by, Customer. If Customer fails to pay any Sales Taxes, then Customer will be liable for any related penalties or interest, and will indemnify OpenGov for any liability or expense incurred in connection with such Sales Taxes. In the event Customer or the transactions contemplated by the Agreement are exempt from Sales Taxes, Customer agrees to provide OpenGov, as evidence of such tax exempt status, proper exemption certificates or other documentation acceptable to OpenGov.
7. TERM & TERMINATION
7.1 Term. Subject to compliance with all terms and conditions, the term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until the Subscription End Date specified on the Order Form (the “Initial Term”) unless sooner terminated pursuant to Section 7.3 below.
7.2 Renewal. This Agreement shall automatically renew for another period of the same duration as the Initial Term (the “Renewal Term” and together with the Initial Term, the “Term”), unless either party notifies the other party of its intent not to renew this Agreement in writing no less than thirty (30) days before the end of the Initial Term.
7.3 Termination. Neither party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without a legally valid cause. If either party materially breaches any term of this Agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after notice by the non-breaching party (ten (10) days in the case of non-payment), the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement. Additionally, Customer may terminate this Agreement, upon providing at least ninety (90) days notice prior to the annual anniversary date of the Agreement ("Anniversary Date") upon the occurrence of an Event of Nonappropriation as defined below. An "Event of Nonappropriation" occurs when prior to each Anniversary Date: a) Customer uses all efforts that are lawful and within Customer's official power, to secure the appropriate funds for the next year's Fees, including indicating the Software Services serve an essential purpose to Customer; and b) Customer has not acquired, used or issued a proposal for similar products or services during this period or has not hired any third party or allowed its own employees to use other services in place of the Software Services. Customer shall permit OpenGov to assist with the efforts in a) above, including providing OpenGov with direct access to Customer's applicable appropriations team.
7.4 Effect of Termination.
(a) In General. Upon termination pursuant to Section 7.3 or expiration of this Agreement pursuant to Section
7.1: (a) Customer shall pay in full for all Software Services and Professional Services performed up to and including the effective date of termination or expiration, (b) all Software Services provided to Customer hereunder shall 237
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
immediately terminate; and (c) each party shall return to the other party or, at the other party’s option, destroy all Confidential Information of the other party in its possession. (b) Deletion of Customer Data. Unless otherwise requested pursuant to this Section 7.4(b), upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement the Customer Data, excluding any Insights, shall be deleted pursuant to OpenGov’s standard data deletion and retention practices. Upon written request, Customer may request deletion of Customer Data, excluding any Insights, prior to the date of termination or expiration of this Agreement. Such request must be addressed to “OpenGov Vice President, Customer Success” at OpenGov’s address for notice described at Section 10.
7.5 Survival. The following sections of this Agreement shall survive termination: Section 5 (Confidentiality), Section 6 (Payment of Fees), Section 7.4(b) (Deletion of Customer Data), Section 8.3 (Warranty Disclaimer), Section 9 (Limitation of Liability) and Section 10 (Miscellaneous).
8. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES; DISCLAIMER
8.1 By OpenGov.
(a) General Warranty. OpenGov represents and warrants that: (i) it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement; and (ii) the Professional Services, if any, will be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner in accordance with the related statement of work and generally prevailing industry standards. For any breach of the Professional Services warranty, Customer’s exclusive remedy and OpenGov’s entire liability will be the re-performance of the applicable services. If OpenGov is unable to re-perform all such work as warranted, Customer will be entitled to recover all fees paid to OpenGov for the deficient work. Customer must make any claim under the foregoing warranty to OpenGov in writing within ninety (90) days of performance of such work in order to receive such warranty remedies.
(b) Software Services Warranty. OpenGov further represents and warrants that for a period of ninety (90) days, the Software Services will perform in all material respects in accordance with the Documentation. The foregoing warranty does not apply to any Software Services that have been used in a manner other than as set forth in the Documentation and authorized under this Agreement. OpenGov does not warrant that the Software Services will be uninterrupted or error-free. Any claim submitted under this Section 8.1(b) must be submitted in writing to OpenGov during the Term. OpenGov’s entire liability for any breach of the foregoing warranty is to repair or replace any nonconforming Software Services so that the affected portion of the Software Services operates as warranted or, if OpenGov is unable to do so, terminate the license for such Software Services and refund the prepaid, unused portion of the Fee for such Software Services.
8.2 By Customer. Customer represents and warrants that (i) it has all right and authority necessary to enter into and perform this Agreement; and (ii) OpenGov’s use of the Customer Data pursuant to this Agreement will not infringe, violate or misappropriate the Intellectual Property Rights of any third party.
8.3 Disclaimer. OPENGOV DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR FREE; NOR DOES IT MAKE ANY WARRANTY AS TO THE RESULTS THAT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE SOFTWARE SERVICES. EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION 8, THE SOFTWARE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” AND OPENGOV DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, TITLE, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT.
9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
9.1 By Type. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS SUPPLIERS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES, REPRESENTATIVES,
CONTRACTORS OR EMPLOYEES, SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE WITH RESPECT TO ANY SUBJECT
MATTER OF THIS AGREEMENT UNDER ANY CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHER THEORY: (A) FOR ERROR OR INTERRUPTION OF USE OR FOR LOSS OR INACCURACY OF DATA OR COST OF PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES OR LOSS OF BUSINESS; (B) FOR ANY INDIRECT, EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES; OR (C) FOR ANY MATTER BEYOND SUCH PARTY’S REASONABLE CONTROL, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE.
238
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
9.2 By Amount. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY’S AGGREGATE, CUMULATIVE LIABILITY FOR ANY
CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE FEES PAID BY
CUSTOMER TO OPENGOV (OR, IN THE CASE OF CUSTOMER, PAYABLE) FOR THE SOFTWARE SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IN THE 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE ACT THAT GAVE RISE TO THE LIABILITY.
9.3 Limitation of Liability Exclusions. The limitations of liability set forth in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 above do not apply to, and each party accepts liability to the other for: (a) claims based on either party’s intentional breach of its obligations set forth in Section 5 (Confidentiality), (b) claims arising out of fraud or willful misconduct by either party and (c) either party’s unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure of the other party’s intellectual property.
9.4 No Limitation of Liability by Law. Because some jurisdictions do not allow liability or damages to be limited to the extent set forth above, some of the above limitations may not apply to Customer.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
10.1 Logo Use. OpenGov shall have the right to use and display Customer’s logos and trade names for marketing and promotional purposes in connection with OpenGov’s website and marketing materials, subject to Customer’s trademark usage guidelines provided to OpenGov.
10.2 Notice. Ordinary day-to-day operational communications may be conducted by email, live chat or telephone communications. However, for notices, including legal notices, required by the Agreement (in Sections where the word “notice” appears) the parties must communicate more formally in a writing given by personal delivery, by prepaid first-class mail or by overnight courier to the address specified in the most recent Order Form (or such other address as may be specified in writing in accordance with this Section).
10.3 Anti-corruption. OpenGov has not offered or provided any bribe, kickback, illegal or improper payment, gift, or thing of value to any Customer personnel in connection with the Agreement, other than reasonable gifts and entertainment provided Customer in the ordinary course of business. If OpenGov become aware of any violation of the above restriction then OpenGov shall promptly notify Customer.
10.4 Injunctive Relief. The parties acknowledge that any breach of the confidentiality provisions or the unauthorized use of a party’s intellectual property may result in serious and irreparable injury to the aggrieved party for which damages may not adequately compensate the aggrieved party. The parties agree, therefore, that, in addition to any other remedy that the aggrieved party may have, it shall be entitled to seek equitable injunctive relief without being required to post a bond or other surety or to prove either actual damages or that damages would be an inadequate remedy.
10.5 Force Majeure. Neither party shall be held responsible or liable for any losses arising out of any delay or failure in performance of any part of this Agreement, other than payment obligations, due to any act of god, act of governmental authority, or due to war, riot, labor difficulty, failure of performance by any third-party service, utilities, or equipment provider, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of the party delayed or prevented from performing.
10.6 Severability; Waiver. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or invalid, that provision will be limited or eliminated to the minimum extent necessary so that this Agreement will otherwise remain in full force and effect and enforceable. Any express waiver or failure to exercise promptly any right under this Agreement will not create a continuing waiver or any expectation of non-enforcement. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement.
10.7 Assignment. Except as set forth in this Section, neither party shall assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations to a third party without the other party's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. Either party may assign, without such consent but upon written notice, its rights and obligations under this Agreement to: (i) its corporate affiliate; or (ii) any entity that acquires all or substantially all of its capital stock or its assets related to this Agreement, through purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise. Any other attempted assignment shall be void. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind each party’s permitted assigns and successors.
10.8 Independent Contractors. No agency, partnership, joint venture, or employment is created as a result of this Agreement and neither party has any authority of any kind to bind the other party in any respect. 239
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
10.9 Attorneys’ Fees. In any action or proceeding to enforce rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover costs and attorneys’ fees.
10.10 Governing Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. Exclusive jurisdiction for litigation of any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be only in the Federal or State court with competent jurisdiction located in San Mateo County, California, and the parties hereby submit to the personal jurisdiction and venue therein.
10.11 Complete Agreement. This Agreement is the complete and exclusive statement of the mutual understanding of the parties and supersedes and cancels all previous written and oral agreements, communications, and other understandings relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. No modification of this Agreement will be binding, unless in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each party. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
240
OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT
Rev. 2018.01_210428NA
Signatures
Customer: ____________________ OPENGOV, INC.
Signature: Signature:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
[SIGNATURE PAGE TO OPENGOV SOFTWARE SERVICES AGREEMENT] 241
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.8
January 26, 2022
Approve the Acknowledgment and Disclaimer of Interests between the City, Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, and Southern California Gas Company for Installa1on of Data Collec1on Units (DCU's) on City Streetlight Poles
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the Acknowledgment and Disclaimer of Interests between the City, Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, and Southern California Gas Company for installa'on of Data Collec'on Units (DCU's) on City Streetlight Poles; and
2. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary documents including the Agreement and take any actions necessary to implement the Agreement.
Summary
Southern California Gas Company (SCG) will install Data Collec'on Units (DCU's) on City Streetlight Poles to support the implementation of its Advanced Meter Program.
Background
As part of a planned region-wide transi'on toward wireless u'lity usage tracking, Southern California Gas Company (SCG) has been upgrading its residen'al and commercial gas meters in the City with "advanced meter" technology. The advanced meter a5aches to exis'ng analog gas meters 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
242
and wirelessly communicate with the Data Collector Units (DCU), which is mounted onto a pole along with two whip antennas and associated ancillary equipment. Exhibit B within the agreement demonstrates the appearance of the proposed facility. The antennas act as "remote gas meter readers" and provide communica'on between gas meters and SoCalGas' data systems. This eliminates the need for gas meter reader's on-foot assessment. The detailed informa'on provided by the advanced meters will help customers be5er understand and manage gas use and costs, enabling them to quickly iden'fy and respond to sudden usage spikes and take steps to conserve.
The antenna system has no capacity or capability to be used for non-u'lity telecommunica'on purposes.
Of five exis'ng SCG facili'es in our City, only one is a5ached to a streetlight, which was owned by Edison at the 'me of implementa'on. Therefore, no a5achment agreement with the City was required. The other four are mounted on SCG owned poles, and they are solar powered. The locations of the existing SCG facilities are shown below:
City
Selected
Site
Point
Pole Detail
(Height &
Material)
Pole Tag
#
AC
or
Solar
Site Location Latitude Longitude
Eastvale LH321-B
Standard
Concrete26' AGL20715 Solar
1) East of 13498 ASPEN
GROVE RD
2) 41 FT SOUTH OF THE
SOUTH CURBFACE OF
65TH STREET
3) 6 FT WEST OF THE
WEST CURBFACE OF
DIAMONDBACK RD,
EASTVALE, RIVERSIDE
CA 92880 United States
33.96787777 -117.5782
Eastvale LI118-A
Standard
Wood-29'
AGL
20716 Solar
On Riverside Dr., west
of 12481 Riverside Dr.;
345’ east of east curb
face of Milliken Ave.;
7’ south of south curb
face of Riverside Dr.
EASTVALE, RIVERSIDE
CA 91752 United States
34.01908333
-
117.5570167
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
243
Eastvale LH323-A
Standard
Wood-29'
AGL
20716 Solar
On Hall Ave., across
from 7643 Hall Ave.;
607’ S. of S. curb face of
Walters St.;
12’ E. of E. edge of
pavement of Hall Ave.
CITY OF EASTVALE,
RIVERSIDE CA 92880
United States
33.9505
-
117.6044833
Eastvale LH320-A
Standard
Concrete26' AGL20717 Solar
On Prado Basin Pk Rd.,
across from 8507
Kendra Ln.;
67’ E. of E. curb face of
Archibald Ave.;
12’ N. of N. curb face of
Prado Basin Park Rd.
EASTVALE, RIVERSIDE
CA 92280 United States
33.93326666
-
117.5947667
SL
(previously
SCE) -
EASTVALE
LH6585-
A
Attachment 4237399E AC
1) On Parkwood Ave;
Across street/south of
14048 Parkwood Ave.
2) 292 ft. west of the
west curb face of
Corona Valley Ave.
3) 7 ft. south of the
south curb face of
Parkwood Ave.,
Eastvale, Riverside CA
92880 United States
33.954783 -117.589575
To help close the current gap in the exis'ng network within the City, SCG is proposing to add another site with DCU. To minimize the number of new facility installa'on within the City's Rightsof-way, the City desires to allow the SCG to install its equipment on City streetlight poles. The proposed location is shown below:
City
Selected
Site Point
Pole Detail
(Height &
Material)
Pole Tag # AC or Solar
Site
Location
Latitude Longitude
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
244
Eastvale LH346-E Attachment E3821 AC
On Oakdale
St; east of
12884
Oakdale St
33.9711 -117.5644
Staff worked with the City A5orney to nego'ate the terms and condi'ons with the SCG. The terms and conditions of this Attachment Agreement are consistent with other agencies contracted.
In 2018, City entered in an Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC to finance the acquisi'on, installa'on and retrofiNng of streetlight equipment in the City. To satisfy all terms and provisions in the Agreement, Banc of America required that the City and the Gas Company provide the disclaimers and further assurances in the form of written document.
The City's Planning Division and Public Works Department will con'nue to work with the SCG to minimize the number of installa'on, assure they do not nega'vely impact City light poles, and have minimal visual impact to the community.
Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: 5 | Goal #: N/A Improved Infrastructure
Fiscal Impact
Per Installa'on Site, a one-'me fee of $1,065 for compensa'on plus $359 for electrical consump'on will be charged to SCG. This will be receipted as revenue in miscellaneous income account 100-000- 4700.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
There is no prior City Council or Commission action.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Acknowledgment and Disclaimer of Interests 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
245
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DISCLAIMER OF INTERESTS
This Acknowledgment and Disclaimer of Interests (“Disclaimer”) is entered into this ____ day of _________, 2022, by and among the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”), Southern California Gas Company, a California corporation hereinafter referred to as the ("Gas Company") and Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC (and its successors and assigns, “Secured Party”), as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and Secured Party entered in an Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement (Escrow Account; Implementation Agreement) (as amended, “BALC Financing Agreement”) on or about September 27, 2018, to finance the acquisition, installation and retrofitting of streetlight equipment in the City and other capital improvements, equipment and other property, together with all replacements, repairs, restorations, modifications and improvements thereof or thereto and all accessories, equipment, parts and appurtenances appertaining or attached to any of such equipment, and all substitutions, renewals, or replacements of and additions, improvements, accessions and accumulations to any and all of such equipment, together with all the rents, issues, income, profits, proceeds and avails therefrom (excluding the SCGC Equipment as described on the terms hereof, collectively, the “BALC Collateral”); and
B. The Secured Party has an exclusive first priority security interest constituting a first lien on such Collateral.
C. Section 5.04(d) of the BALC Financing Agreement states that any accessories, equipment or devices affixed to the streetlights “shall thereupon become subject to the security interest of Lessor.”
D. The City anticipates entering into an Gas Meter Attachment Agreement (the “Gas Meter Attachment Agreement”) with Southern California Gas Company, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for the installation of Advanced Meter Facilities therein on certain streetlights identified on Exhibit B (the “SCGC Equipment”), which Exhibit B is incorporated herein by this reference (and the locations and properties referred to therein are hereby referred to as “Installation Sites”).
E. The Secured Party, as a condition to permitting the attachment of the SCGC Equipment on the BALC Collateral requires that the City and the Gas Company provide the disclaimers and further assurances set forth in this Acknowledgment and Disclaimer of Interests.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties do hereby enter into this Disclaimer and, respectively, represent, warrant and covenant, as follows:
246
1. Notwithstanding Section 5.04(d) of the BALC Financing Agreement, the City and the Secured Party permit the Gas Company (subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of this Disclaimer and the Attachment Agreement) to affix the SCGC Equipment on the streetlights identified as the Installation Sites and agree that such SCGC Equipment shall not become subject to the security interest of Secured Party under the BALC Financing Agreement. The Gas Company waives, disclaims, relinquishes and releases all interest in, right or claim to and lien on the BALC Collateral, including, but not limited to, any right of levy or distraint upon the BALC Collateral for rent. The Secured Party waives, disclaims, relinquishes and releases all interest in, right or claim to and lien on the SCGC Equipment.
2. The Gas Company acknowledges Secured Party’s exclusive first priority security interest in the BALC Collateral. The Gas Company acknowledges and agrees that except for attaching, operating, maintaining and removing the SCGC Equipment prudently, it has no right to remove or disturb any of the BALC Collateral and Gas Company shall be liable for any damages to the BALC Collateral directly caused by the SCGC Equipment or the failure of the Gas Company to attach, operate, maintain, remove or use the SCGC Equipment and the BALC Collateral with reasonable care and shall notify City and Secured Party of any such damage. The City (or Secured Party, to the extent permitted under the BALC Financing Agreement) may from time to time, at its own expense, make additions, modifications and improvements to the BALC Collateral (to the extent doing so complies with the terms of the BALC Financing Agreement) but not the SCGC Equipment.
Such additions, modifications and improvements to the BALC Collateral shall remain the sole property of the City (subject only to Secured Party’s exclusive first priority security interest), and the Gas Company shall have no interest therein. The Secured Party is granted the right of ingress and egress on the Installation Sites to inspect, use and/or (with prior written notice to the Gas Company) remove the BALC Collateral, and at any time may enter upon the Installation Sites to inspect, use and/or (with prior written notice to the Gas Company) remove the BALC Collateral located there without any liability whatsoever, except for any damages to the City’s buildings or SCGC Equipment or other improvements on the Installation Sites directly caused by the failure of the Secured Party to remove or use the BALC Collateral with reasonable care.
The Gas Company agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Secured Party from and against losses, liability or claims from owner of the real property where the Installation Sites are located and that are related to the SCGC Equipment or the Gas Meter Attachment Agreement.
3. The Gas Company shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Secured Party and its officers, agents and employees against all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, causes of action, fines or penalties, including but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees (collectively, “Claims”), for injury to or death of persons or damage to property incurred by Secured Party arising from the Advanced Meter Facilities being located on the BALC Collateral. This indemnity shall not extend to Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Secured Party, its officers, agents, or employees. Further, the Gas Company’s indemnification obligations shall not include any punitive, consequential or special damages, except to the extent asserted by a third party 247
against the Secured Party arising from a Claim for which Gas Company is obligated to indemnify the Secured Party under this paragraph.
4. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any agreement or instrument, and notwithstanding the means by which the BALC Collateral may be attached or affixed to the Installation Sites, the BALC Collateral shall be and remain equipment or other personal property and shall not be considered a fixture, a part of or affixed to the Installation Sites. Title to the BALC Collateral shall vest in the City, subject only to Secured Party’s exclusive first priority security interest therein, and otherwise shall be controlled by the terms of the BALC Financing Agreement.
5. The City represents that other than the Secured Party’s interests in the BALC Collateral and the attachment, operation and maintenance of the SCGC Equipment thereto on the terms set forth herein, no other lien, mortgage, hypothecation, encumbrance, security interest or other arrangement (including any financing arrangement or conditional sale or other encumbrance on title to real property or any financing lease having substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing) exists on, or is proposed or contemplated, with respect to the Installation Sites.
6. The City agrees to notify any party with any interest in the Installation Sites of this Disclaimer and shall ensure that no other Person with any interest in the Installation Sites or the SCGC Equipment has any interest in, right or claim to and lien on the BALC Collateral without Secured Party’s prior written consent in its sole and absolute discretion. The Gas Company agrees to notify any party with an interest in the SCGC Equipment of this Disclaimer and shall ensure that no other Person with any interest in the SCGC Equipment has any interest in, right or claim to and lien on the BALC Collateral without Secured Party’s prior written consent in its sole and absolute discretion. This Disclaimer shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of the City, the Gas Company and inure to the benefit of the Secured Party and its successors and assigns. “Person” means any individual, corporation, not for profit corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, association, professional association, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, government or any agency or political subdivision thereof or any other form of entity.
7. The City is the fee simple owner of the Installation Sites and warrants that it has authority to execute and deliver this Disclaimer to the Secured Party. The Gas Company warrants that it has authority to execute and deliver this Disclaimer to the Secured Party.
8. All notices, demands, requests, consents or other communications that this Disclaimer contemplates or authorizes, or requires or permits either party to give to the other, shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or mailed or sent by reputable overnight courier, such as FedEx, to the respective party as follows:
if to the City: City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
248
Attn: City Manager
Tel: (951) 361-0900
if to the Gas Company: Southern California Gas Company
555 West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Attn: Aineakho Ojior
Manager, Advanced Meter Network Deployment
Tel: (213) 231-6163
if to the Secured Party: Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC 11333 McCormick Road
Hunt Valley II
M/C MD5-032-07-05
Hunt Valley, MD 21031
Attention: Contract Administration
GENERAL PROVISIONS
(a) Integration. This Disclaimer constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Disclaimer. (b) Effective Date. This Disclaimer shall not become effective until the date it has been executed by the parties hereto. This Disclaimer shall be continuing, absolute and unconditional, with no act of any kind taken or not taken by any party at any time to affect or impair this Disclaimer. This Disclaimer shall remain in full force and effect until the earlier of (a) all obligations of the City to the Secured Party created or existing under the BALC Financing Agreement have been fully paid and performed and all obligations under this Disclaimer have been satisfied in full or (b) the permanent removal of all SCGC Equipment without any damage to the BALC Collateral. This Disclaimer may not be amended, modified, waived, or replaced except with the prior written consent of each of the parties hereto.
(c) Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Disclaimer.
249
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Disclaimer on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Bryan Jones
City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
By: ____ _______
Name: ___________________________
Its: ______________________________
250
251
Exhibit “A”
Gas Meter Attachment Agreement
252
1 ATTACHMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA
AND
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
This Attachment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into this day of , 2022, by and between the City of Eastvale, a California municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the (“City”) and Southern California Gas Company, a California corporation hereinafter referred to as the ("Gas Company"). Hereinafter the term “Parties” shall refer collectively to all the foregoing named Parties. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date indicated hereinabove (the “Effective Date”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, Gas Company is an investor-owned public utility that provides gas utility services to residents of City.
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2014, City granted to Gas Company a franchise to use and lay pipes and appurtenances necessary and convenient for the operation of a gas utility under, along, across or upon public streets, ways, alleys and places (collectively, “Rights-of-Way”) in the City for transmitting and distributing gas (the “Franchise”).
WHEREAS, Gas Company has been authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission to implement its Advanced Meter Program, which consists of, among other things, the installation of advanced meter equipment, network communications devices, including but not limited to data collector units (“DCUs), antennas, gas repeaters and/or radio frequency local area network range extenders, and other advanced meter facilities, in connection with and necessary for Gas Company’s operation, transmission and distribution of gas in the City (“Advanced Meter Facilities”).
WHEREAS, the installation of Advanced Meter Facilities requires the use of existing or new infrastructure, such as poles, towers, streetlights or buildings of sufficient height and at appropriate locations in order to be effective.
WHEREAS, City desires to allow the Gas Company to install its Advanced Meter Facilities, which are further described herein, within property owned by City identified on “Exhibit A” and incorporated herein by this reference (“Installation Sites”).
WHEREAS, City and Gas Company have agreed to enter into this Agreement regarding Gas Company’s use and attachment of Advanced Meter Facilities at the Installation Sites upon the terms, conditions and other considerations set forth herein. 253
2 A G R E E M E N T
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration thereof and for other valuable consideration as set forth herein below the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective as of the date of its execution by or on behalf of all the Parties hereto (“Effective Date”).
2. Term. The term shall be for 20 years from the Effective Date.
3. Authorization. Subject to the terms and conditions contained herein, City hereby authorizes Gas Company to install Advanced Meter Facilities upon Installation Sites and to operate, use, maintain, repair, replace, improve, alter, inspect, test and remove such Advanced Meter Facilities on the terms and conditions set forth herein. Any Advanced Meter Facilities installed upon Installation Sites shall be designed to have an appearance and the dimensions substantially similar to the facility depicted in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein. Unless the Parties enter into a separate agreement or written amendment to this Agreement, Gas Company shall have no right or authority to install Advanced Meter Facilities or any other facility or equipment upon City-owned property that has not been specifically identified in Exhibit “A”.
4. Scope of Agreement. This Agreement authorizes the Gas Company to attach the Advanced Meter Facilities in the general locations identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and to undertake all activities related to the installation, maintenance, operation, use, repair, replacement, improvement, alteration, inspection, testing and removal of the Advanced Meter Facilities.
Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint-venture or of any association whatsoever between City and Gas Company, it being expressly understood and agreed that neither the computation of fees nor any other provisions contained in this Agreement nor any act or acts of the parties hereto shall be deemed to create any relationship between City and Gas Company other than the relationship of City and Gas Company.
Gas Company hereby acknowledges, agrees and covenants that this Agreement does not authorize or bestow any rights to Gas Company to provide cable television service or commercial telecommunications services.
5. Compensation. The Gas Company shall pay to the City a one-time fee of One Thousand Sixty-Five Dollars ($1065), representing an administrative fee of $285 plus a license fee of $780 ($39/year x 20 years) per Installation Site. The fee shall be due within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.
6. Electrical Consumption Charge. Gas Company shall pay the City a one-time fee of $359.00 (which represents a base fee of $13.15 per year for the first year, with a three percent (3%) increase in the base fee each year after over the next 254
3 twenty years) per Installation Site as compensation for electricity usage by the Gas Company’s Advanced Meter Facilities. The fee shall be due within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date.
7. Authority to Allow Attachments. The City hereby represents and warrants to the Gas Company that it has all rights necessary to allow for the installation of the Advanced Meter Facilities at the Installation Sites, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Gas Company from and against losses, liability or claims from owner of the real property where the Installation Sites are located and that are related to the rights conferred to the Gas Company under this Agreement.
8. Workmanship and Responsibility of Gas Company. All of Gas Company's construction and installation work shall be performed at Gas Company's sole cost and expense and in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with the rules and regulation of the CPUC and in compliance with all applicable ordinances, regulations or law (to the extent not inconsistent with or preempted by the jurisdiction of the CPUC).
Gas Company shall remove all of the Advanced Meter Facilities at its sole expense within one hundred eighty (180) days after the termination of the Agreement, unless an agreement is otherwise reached between the City and Gas Company to abandon the Advanced Meter Facilities in place. Gas Company shall bear full responsibility for repairs to any damage to the Rights-of-Way caused by Gas Company’s or its employees’, contractors’, subcontractors’ or agents’ installation, construction, maintenance, repair, operation and removal of the Advanced Meter Facilities.
9. Gas Company to Bear All Costs. The Gas Company, or any successor or authorized assign, shall bear all costs incurred in connection with Gas Company’s or its employees’, contractors’, subcontractors’ or agents’ planning, design, installation, construction, maintenance, repair, operation and removal of the Advanced Meter Facilities. City shall not be responsible or bear any cost for repair of any damage or movement of Advanced Meter Facilities due to repair, maintenance and/or failure/collapse of any existing gas, water and sewer lines or any other improvements or works approximate to Advanced Meter Facilities, except for the active negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors or subcontractors.
10. Interference. The Gas Company installation and use of the Advanced Meter Facilities under this Agreement shall not damage or interfere in any way with City’s operations. The City at all times during this Agreement, reserves the right to take any action it deems necessary, in its sole discretion, to repair, maintain, alter, or improve the Installation Sites, which may temporarily interfere with the Advanced Meter Facilities. The City agrees to give 30 day advance notice of such interference to the Gas Company and to reasonably cooperate with the Gas Company to carry out such activities with a minimum amount of interference with the Gas Company’s operations.
11. Existing Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement. The City has advised the Gas Company that the City entered into an Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement with Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC, dated September 27, 2018 (“Equipment Agreement”), regarding the financing, acquisition, installation, and retrofitting of certain equipment 255
4 and light poles in the City, including, but not limited to the Installation Sites. Pursuant to the Equipment Agreement, the City shall not alter or permit the alteration of any of the Installation Sites or install or permit the installation of any accessory, equipment or device on the Installation Sites that would impair any applicable warranty, the originally intended function, or value of the Installation Sites. The Equipment Agreement also prohibits the City from using the Installation Sites in a matter that would result in a material adverse effect or material adverse change in the Installation Sites.
In the event that the City receives a notice of default from Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC pursuant to the Equipment Agreement as a result of the installation or operation of an Advanced Meter Facilities, the Gas Company shall remove all Advanced Meter Facilities installed pursuant to this Agreement within twenty (20) days. In the event of such removal, the City shall refund the payments provided to the City by the Gas Company pursuant to Sections 5 and 6 of this Agreement on a pro rata basis.
12. Indemnification of City. Gas Company shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its council members, officers, agents and employees against all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, liabilities, causes of action, fines or penalties, including but not limited to reasonable attorney’s fees (collectively, “Claims”), for injury to or death of persons or damage to property incurred by City arising from the Advanced Meter Facilities being located on the street light poles, including but not limited to Claims arising from an alleged breach or default of the Equipment Agreement as a result of the installation or operation of Advanced Meter Facilities. This indemnity shall not extend to Claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers, agents, or employees, provided. Further, the Gas Company’s indemnification obligations shall not include any punitive, consequential or special damages, except to the extent asserted by a third party against the City arising from a Claim for which Gas Company is obligated to indemnify the City under this paragraph.
13. Governing Law, Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed and construed by and in accordance with the Laws of the State of California. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to preclude either party’s right to seek redress from the CPUC.
14. Amendment of Agreement. This Agreement may not be amended except pursuant to a written instrument signed by both parties.
15. Notices. All notices, demands, requests, consents or other communications that this Agreement contemplates or authorizes, or requires or permits either party to give to the other, shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or mailed or sent by reputable overnight courier, such as FedEx, to the respective party as follows:
TO CITY:
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Attn: City Manager
Tel: (951) 361-0900
256
5 TO THE GAS COMPANY:
Southern California Gas Company 555
West Fifth Street
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Attn: Aineakho Ojior
Manager, Advanced Meter Network Deployment
Tel: (213) 231-6163
Either party may change its address by notice to the other party as provided herein.
Communications shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of (i) actual receipt at the offices of the party to whom the communication is to be sent, as designated above, or (ii) three working days following the deposit in the United States Mail of registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or with reputable overnight courier, such as FedEx, addressed to the offices of the party to whom the communication is to be sent, as designated above.
16. Other Regulations. All Gas Company’s use of the Rights-of-Way under this Agreement shall be in accordance with the laws of the United States of America, the State of California and in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations and ordinances of the City now in force, or hereinafter prescribed or promulgated by resolution or ordinance or by State or Federal law (to the extent that the same are not inconsistent with or preempted by the jurisdiction of the CPUC).
17. Powers to Enter into Agreement. The individuals executing this Agreement represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement on behalf of the respective legal entities of the Gas Company and the City.
18. Assignment or Transfer of Authorization. This Agreement may be assigned or transferred to any qualified person or entity subject to the prior written approval of the City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, City’s prior written consent shall not be required for any of the following: (a) the transfer of any shares or stock in or change in control of Gas Company’s parent company, or (b) any merger, consolidation or reorganization of, by or with Gas Company or transfer of all or substantially all of the stock or shares in Gas Company or assets of Gas Company.
19. Entire Agreement; Successors and Assigns. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. There are no representations, agreements, or understandings, whether oral or written, between or among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement which are not fully expressed herein. Each party has relied on advice from its own attorneys, and the warranties, representations, and covenants of this Agreement itself. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
257
6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained and have caused this Agreement to be executed by setting hereunto their signatures on the day and year respectively written herein below.
DATE: __________________________ CITY OF EASTVALE
By: __________________________________________
Bryan Jones, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: __________________________________________
Erica Vega, City Attorney
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
DATE: By:
Aineakho Ojior
DCU Field Operations Manager
Advanced Meter
258
7 Exhibit “A” Light Standards
SoCalGas
Site lD#
Pole ID# Latitude Longitude Location Address
LH6585-A E1234 33.954783 -117.589575
On Parkwood Ave; Across street/south of 14048
Parkwood Ave.
292 ft. west of the west curb face of Corona Valley Ave. 7 ft. south of the south curb face of Parkwood Ave.,
Eastvale, Riverside CA 92880 United States
LH346-E E3821 33.971069 -117.564368
On Oakdale St., E. of 12884 Oakdale St. (Harada Elem.
School)
27’ SW. of W. curb face of Merry Meadows Dr.
8' N of N curb face of Oakdale St. (behind sidewalk)
Eastvale, Riverside, CA 92880
259
Exhibit “B” Construction Plan
CITY:
COUNTY:
JURISDICTION:
SITE NUMBER/ID:
SITE TYPE:
EASTVALE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CITY OF EASTVALE
VARIOUS
(E) 23’ A.G.L. AMERON POLE
1C123, AC POWER
GENTRAL NOTES AND CONDITIONS
260
9 8| DETAIL E 1tI DETAIL H
H£ TE- UT
iz . ' z ‘
r ' Ji ._ 0
9 I DETAIL G 1g DETAIL F 121 DETAIL J
7| SITE ELEVATION LOOKING EAST
1 | DETAIL A 2 [ OETAIL B DETAIL C 4 ] DETAIL D
261
10 MATERIAL
LIST
RPLEY 5731-05
STREET MGHT PH TAP
” SoCalGas
e) nergy
ELECTRICAL
DIAGRAM
End of Exhibit “B”Construction Plan
262
Exhibit “B”
SoCalGas Site lD# Pole ID# Latitude Longitude Location Address LH6585-A E1234 33.954783 -117.589575
On Parkwood Ave; Across street/south of 14048
Parkwood Ave.
292 ft. west of the west curb face of Corona Valley Ave. 7 ft. south of the south curb face of Parkwood Ave., Eastvale, Riverside CA 92880 United States
LH346-E E3821 33.971069 -117.564368
On Oakdale St., E. of 12884 Oakdale St. (Harada Elem.
School)
27’ SW. of W. curb face of Merry Meadows Dr.
8' N of N curb face of Oakdale St. (behind sidewalk)
Eastvale, Riverside, CA 92880
263
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.9
January 26, 2022
Approve Task Order A-5 in the Amount of $114,000.00 with Conceptual Design & Planning Company for Schleisman Road Multi-use Trail Landscape Conceptual Plan Services
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve Task Order A-5 in the amount of $114,000.00 with Conceptual Design & Planning Company for Schleisman Road Multi-use Trail Landscape Conceptual Plan Services; and
2. Authorize City Manager to execute Task Order A-5 with On-Call Professional Services Vendor Conceptual Design & Planning Company.
Summary
The City has several Safety and Connec2vity Projects related to the General Plan that include design and construc2on of mul2-use trails to improve safety and connec2vity for everyone to use whether in a car, on a bike or on foot. The Schleisman Road Mobility, Safety and Connec2vity Project includes installing a mul2-use trail along Schleisman Road between Hamner Avenue and Sumner Avenue.
Staff is recommending that the City Council approve task order to Conceptual Design & Planning Company (CDPC) to develop a conceptual plan that meets the City's vision and goals. Once a conceptual plan is developed, the City will request proposals from civil engineering firms to develop plans and specifications.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
264
Background
On February 26, 2020 City Council Approved Conceptual Design & Planning Company as a Professional On-Call Services Consultant for the area of Landscape Architecture. The approved oncall agreement with CDPC is not to exceed $350,000. $250,000 of that can be used for landscape architectural services and $100,000 can be used for placemaking services.
Task Orders approved for CDPC work are listed below:
Task Order A1 Hamner Place Landscape - Final Walk $ 800 Task Order A2 Landscape Plan Maintenance Guidelines $ 3,500 Task Order A3 I-15 Preliminary Landscape Plan $ 3,000
Task Order A4 I-15 Conceptual Landscape Plan $20,000
Task Order A5 Hamner Place Slope Landscape Plan Revision $ 2,000 Total $29,300
The staff recommends the City Council to approve Task Order A-6 for Schleisman Road Trail Conceptual Plan in the amount of $114,000. The total of the task orders including A6 is within the approved not to exceed amount.
Environmental
Approval of the contract is not a project and is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An environmental determina2on will be required prior to construction of the project.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 3 Plan for landscape, roads and street maintenance
Fiscal Impact
There is sufficient amount budgeted in the project #93027 - Schleisman Road Mobility, Safety and Connectivity Project (210-510-6660).
Prior City Council/Commission Action
February 26, 2020 City Council approved the On-Call Professional Services Consultants which included Conceptual Design & Planning Company.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - CDPC Agreement
Attachment 2 - Task A-6 CDCP
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
265
AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
[LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE; PEACEMAKING]
This Agreement for On-Call Professional Services ("Agreement") Is entered Into as of this \4- day of . 2020 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation ("City") and Conceptual Design and Planning Company, a California corporation ("Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter Individually referred to as "Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for qualifications the performance of the services defined and described particularly In Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of Its qualifications for the performance of the services defined and described particularly In Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly In Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement Is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term of this Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term of five years.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. (a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform landscape architecture and placemaking services (hereinafter, the "Services") as requested and authorized by -theXlty^When the-Clt>Ldeslres-to utlllze-Contractor-for ServlGeSi-the-Clty-wlll Issue-aTask Order that Includes a Scope of Services to be performed and the compensation to be paid for the Services within the Task Order. Each Task Order shall be attached to this Agreement In Exhibit "A" (e.g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit "A-1", the second Exhibit "A-2," etc.). Each Task Order Is made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
-1
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
PREPARED FOR:
City of Eastvale
Public Works Department
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, California 91752
12.15.21 SUBMITTED BY:
Conceptual Design and Planning Company
3195-C Airport Loop Drive
Costa Mesa, California 92626
PROPOSAL FOR
PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
MOBILITY, SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT
www.cdpcinc.com
PROPOSAL NO. 21-073
286
C D P C | PROPOSAL | SCHLEISMAN ROAD MOBILITY, SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT PAGE | 2 Task 1. Project AdministraƟ on and CoordinaƟ on
Provide assistance in coordinaƟ ng project meeƟ ngs with the stakeholders, business owners and residents.
Provide coordinaƟ on with Webb Associates for the purpose of developing meeƟ ng agendas and aƩ endance (aƩ endance shall be outlined per each task).
Provide assistance to develop the project schedule.
Task 2. Due Diligence
Review the City of Eastvale trails/pedestrian connecƟ ons as they pertain to project scope area.
Meet with the City of Eastvale and Stakeholders to review the proposed project.
Overall CreaƟ ve Plan Guidance to Project Infrastructure – Provide a thoughƞ ul and non-linear perspecƟ ve on the overall plan of Eastvale’s growth and direcƟ on. Contribute ideas that might not ordinarily be revealed and thereby build a stronger community.
Visioning/Mood Boards to Guide Development Look/Feel/Purpose – Study and shape the experience for residents and visitors of Eastvale by developing a ‘visual storyline’ that informs the direcƟ on of the project.
NavigaƟ onal Markers and Wayfi nding – Visually build a system of markers that can provide not only informaƟ on, but beauƟ fy and engage the user experience.
Experience Design of Public AcƟ vaƟ on Spaces – Develop permanent and temporary experiences, places of interacƟ on, and places of acƟ ve and passive beauty within the infrastructure of Eastvale.
ConnecƟ vity of Pedestrian & Vehicular notes – Build a framework that connects criƟ cal elements of Eastvale. Create corridors that allow Eastvale to access various points of usage and interests within the City. The result would be less stress, keep residents in place and draw new residents looking for this type of experience.
Obtain from the City of Eastvale exisƟ ng condiƟ ons street improvement plans.
Task 4.I Conceptual Landscape Plan
To aid in the development of the landscape design. The services in this secƟ on will include the following:
Discuss the project goals with the City of Eastvale and the project design team.
Provide analyses of the following program elements:
• Site constraints.
• Visual constraints.
• Pedestrian/vehicular circulaƟ on interface.
• Solar orientaƟ on.
• Retail interface.
• Sense of place.
• Gathering space.
• ConnecƟ vity.
• OpportuniƟ es.
Obtain project planning data including architectural, applicable City of Eastvale plan requirements, exisƟ ng site plan informaƟ on, and exisƟ ng topographic.
Prepare two (2) 60-scale conceptual design indicaƟ ng locaƟ on of design elements and pedestrian/vehicular circulaƟ on. The conceptual design is to communicate the proposed design intent and to develop the iniƟ al design.
AƩ end and parƟ cipate in a Design CharreƩ e/Workshop to review the proposed design alternaƟ ves with the City of Eastvale.
Prepare a refi ned 60-scale conceptual illustraƟ ve landscape plan indicaƟ ng locaƟ on of design elements and pedestrian/vehicular circulaƟ on. Review the illustraƟ ve landscape plan with the City and project design team to discuss the fi nal design intent. Upon review, provide modifi caƟ ons necessary to the conceptual illustraƟ ve landscape plan for City review and approval.
Provide overall design input to depict the exisƟ ng streetscape with the proposed development.
PROJECT TASKS
287
C D P C | PROPOSAL | SCHLEISMAN ROAD MOBILITY, SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT PAGE | 3 Provide a colored, rendered plan for presentaƟ on to the City and the project design team.
Coordinate exisƟ ng light standard and pedestrian fi xtures with the team for the purpose of confi rming selecƟ on.
Provide image board depicƟ ng proposed site ameniƟ es and landscape plant paleƩ e.
This secƟ on includes a total of two (2) addiƟ onal 4-hour project meeƟ ngs and or teleconferences. AddiƟ onal meeƟ ngs or Ɵ me other than as described shall be billed at the hourly rates indicated.
Task 4.II – SchemaƟ c Landscape Plan
To aid in the further development and refi nement of the conceptual plan. The services in this secƟ on will include the following.
Review any updates to the conceptual site plan with the City, project design team, and project stakeholders.
Prepare six (6) 20-scale enlargements of the preliminary landscape plan indicaƟ ng locaƟ on of proposed hardscape elements, pedestrian circulaƟ on, site furnishings, and planƟ ng concepts. The following elements shall be included in the Full SubmiƩ al:
• Trees, shrubs, and groundcover areas or other soŌ scape elements. • Pedestrian interface (typical).
• Pedestrian gathering (typical).
• Site furnishings.
• Site ameniƟ es.
• IntersecƟ on (typical).
• SecƟ ons (4).
Provide four (4) presentaƟ on exhibits and video for the proposed Master Plan Pedestrian/Walkable Eastvale streetscape.
Provide colored full size and reducƟ on of the schemaƟ c landscape presentaƟ on plan for presentaƟ on to the City and the project design team.
Provide image board depicƟ ng proposed site ameniƟ es and landscape plant paleƩ e.
Provide esƟ maƟ on of cost for a typical block secƟ on based on the proposed design.
This secƟ on includes a total of two (2) 4-hour project meeƟ ngs and or teleconferences. AddiƟ onal meeƟ ngs or Ɵ me other than as described shall be billed at the hourly rates indicated.
PROJECT TASKS
288
Fee Exhibit
Conceptual Design and Planning Company Hourly Rates
Principal $180.00
Associate Principal $170.00
Director of Design $160.00
Associate Landscape Architect $150.00
Senior Landscape Architect $140.00
Branding/Wayfinding Principal $120.00
Senior Project Manager $120.00
Project Manager $110.00
Job Captain $100.00
Senior Draftsman $ 90.00
Draftsman $ 80.00
Clerical $ 70.00
Conceptual Design and Planning Company Fees
Task 1.0 – Project Administration and Coordination $ 12,000.00 Task 2 – Records and Base Map $ 12,000.00
Task 4.I – Conceptual Landscape Plan $ 65,000.00
Task 4.II – Schematic Landscape Plan $ 25,000.00
Total: $114,000.00
289
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND PLANNING COMPANY
SÊçã«ÙÄ C½®¥ÊÙÄ® O¥¥®
3195-C Airport Loop Drive, Studio One
Costa Mesa, California 92626
T 949.399.0870
CÄãÙ½ C½®¥ÊÙÄ® O¥¥®
6659 Morro Road
Atascadero, California 93422
T 805.466.3385
SÊçã«ÙÄ Nò O¥¥®
8275 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 114
Las Vegas, Nevada 98123
T 702.818.1223
www.cdpcinc.com
To evoke a feeling.
Enhance an experience.
Enrich a life.
C D P C | PROPOSAL | SCHLEISMAN ROAD MOBILITY, SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY PROJECT 290
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.10
January 26, 2022
First Amendment for Professional Services Agreement with Infinity Technologies for Information Technology Services
Prepared By:
Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the first amendment to the professional services agreement with Infinity Technologies.
2. Authorize the Acting City Manager to execute all necessary documents.
Summary
Currently, Infinity Technologies provides on-site support at City Hall/City facili)es 3 days a week. As we con)nue to grow as a City, the demands for informa)on technology (IT) support increases. Staff is recommending to increase on-site support to 4 days a week, during normal business hours.
Besides on-site support, also included in the existing agreement is:
1. 24 x 7 x 365 technical and unlimited remote support
2. Support of all City software's
3. Proactive networking monitoring and backup services
4. Network and infrastructure support
5. Server maintenance and backup
Background
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
291
The City has been consul)ng for IT services with Infinity Technologies since June 2021. They oversee the day-to-day operations of information technology services for the City.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
The new proposed monthly flat fee for IT services is $13,000. The monthly fee will be paid out of account number 100-240-6412.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
The City Council previously approved the ini)al agreement with Infinity Technologies on April 28, 2021.
At their January 12, 2022 mee)ng, the City Council approved funding for the increased on-site IT support during the mid-year budget process.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 1st Amendment to Agreement with Infinity Technologies.doc Attachment 2 - Original Professional Services Agreement 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
292
-1-
First Amendment to Agreement
This First Amendment to Agreement (“First Amendment”) is entered into this 26th day of January, 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale, a California general law city (“City”), and Infinity Technologies, a California corporation (“Contractor”), as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered in an agreement for Information Technology Services on or about June 1, 2021 with a flat monthly fee of $10,000 for information technology services.
B. City and Contractor desire to amend the scope of services to reflect additional coverage at City Hall for information technology services and a modified monthly fee.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this First Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:
1. AMENDMENTS.
a. Compensation. Section 4(a) and Exhibit B of the Agreement are amended to increase the monthly flat fee for information technology services to $13,000.
b. Scope of Services. The scope of services in Exhibit A are modified to reflect a monthly on-site support service of 4 days/32 hours per week.
2. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this First Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.
b. Integration. This First Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this First Amendment.
c. Effective Date. This First Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Consultant.
d. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this First Amendment. 293
-2-
e. References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this First Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this First Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CITY OF EASTVALE:
____________________________
Acting City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Erica L. Vega, City Attorney
ATTEST:
____________________________
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
___________________________
Name: Mohammad Ahmed
Title: President/CEO
294
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA
AND
INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
This Agreement for Services (" Agreement") is entered into as of this 1st day of June, 2021 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (" City") and True Infinity Technologies, a California corporation (" Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by direct negotiations the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three ( 3) years commencing on the June 1, 2021, with the potential of two ( 2) mutually agreed upon one year extensions.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit " A" " Scope of Services" ( hereinafter, the " Services") and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
b) Schedule of Performance. The Services shall be completed pursuant to the schedule specified in Exhibit " A." Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Contractor shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Contractor to continue performing the Services.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
1 - 295
Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 " Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit " B" " Compensation" and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed ten thousand dollars ($ 10, 000), on a monthly basis, unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement. b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection ( a) and Exhibit " B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis ( as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection ( c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of Contractor' s correct and undisputed invoice. d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor' s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor' s work within sixty ( 60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor' s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City' s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor' s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this 2- 296
Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 " Indemnification" and Section 17 Insurance."
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor' s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 " Standard of Performance" of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors' work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.
SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR' S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor' s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three ( 3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546. 7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars 10, 000. 00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the 3- 297
request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three ( 3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor' s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor' s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors - in -interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor' s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor' s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. c) Neither Contractor , nor any of Contractor's officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City' s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific 298
standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit " A" " Scope of Work" that shall also be applicable to Contractor' s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, " construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U. S. C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor' s performance of 5- 299
the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney' s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor' s conduct.
Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any 300
such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor' s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (" Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor.
c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
7- 301
d) Cit '' s Negligence. The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit " C" " Insurance" and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor' s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 " Termination of Agreement." City acknowledges, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor' s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor' s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty ( 30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty 30) days written notice of termination to City.
c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. 302
d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor' s possession shall be returned to City.
Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 " Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 " Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 " Termination of Agreement." Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor' s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City' s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
303
To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: Bryan Jones, City Manager
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor: Infinity Technologies
Attn: Mohammed Ahmed
P. O. Box 582404
Elk Grove, CA 95758
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 " Amendment" and the City Manager' s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total compensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager' s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. The City' s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City' s rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.
10- 304
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U. S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney' s fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits " A" through " C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision( s). 11 - 305
SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.
Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first -above written.
bwy arc bo'nohue
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
1 Erica Vega
City Attorney
By:
Na e:Mohammad Ahmed
Its: President/ CEO
CITY OF EASTVALE
12- 306
307
NOTE: CONTRACTOR' S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR' S
BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS MUST SUBMIT
DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
13- 308
EXHIBIT " A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of services are outlined in the attachment proposal from Infinity Technologies.
IM
309
EXHIBIT " B"
COMPENSATION
The monthly flat fee for information technology services is $ 10, 000. 310
EXHIBIT " C"
INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A. M.
Best' s rating of no less than A:VII.
Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage ( Occurrence Form CG 0001). 2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 Ed. 1/ 87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 " any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. 3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. 4) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor' s profession. This coverage may be written on a " claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three ( 3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor' s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three ( 3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
1) Commercial General Liability. $ 1, 000, 000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 2) Automobile. $ 1, 000, 000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of C- 1
311
not less than $ 2, 000, 000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $ 1, 000, 000 per occurrence. 4) Professional Liability. $ 1, 000, 000 per occurrence.
B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:
1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. 1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. 2) Contractor' s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor' s insurance. 3) Contractor' s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
3. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation C- 2
312
against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit "C". The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.
2. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor' s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
C- 3
313
Infinity Technologies PM
CITY OF EASTVALE, CA April 15, 2021
DESCRIPTION OFSERVICESAND COST QUOTE FOR:
MONTHLY IT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Introduction
Infinity Technologies would like to thank the City of Eastvale for the opportunity to provide a quote for services to continue to support your technology needs. Infinity Technologies has extensive experience in developing city IT departments from the ground up, as well as maintaining a high level of service for ongoing management of City technology requirements.
Infinity Technologies is submitting this quote that will provide the City of Eastva le with a reliable set of technology services including a help desk to support your network and desktop PCs, provide reliable server management, administeryour email system and support your mobile devices. We will continue to offer these services under a flat monthly technology fee.
Additionally, we have a broad set of experience and expertise to offer IT services beyond the scope outlined below for any new or special projects. In these instances, we will work with you to develop budget to ensure they meet you r ti me and cost expectations.
Monthly Support - Scope of Services
A benefit to selecting Infinity Technologies IT to provide your monthly IT support is that we provide a complimentary onsite network assessment and recommendation. This involves ourtea m working with you to discover any technology challenges and we will identify opportunities tofollow best practices. We will conduct and inventory of applicable ITequipment. During our audit, we will document our findings and meet with you to ensure you are aware of ou rfi ndi ngs and any recommendations. Infinity Technologies will provide support for your mission - critical systems, including desktops, network equipment, City Software, Microsoft office 365 Email System, Mobile Devices and Server Management.
The services listed below are included inour flat monthly fee: 1.
On - Site 3 Days a week ( flexible with City's schedule) 2. 24 x 7 x 365 Technical Support3.
24x7x365 Unlimited Remote Support (Help Desk) 4.
After hour and holiday support5.
Response times (Described in SLA) 6.
Accela Enterprise Software Support 7.
Department Outreach 8.
City Software Support9.
Proactive network monitoring and backup services 10.
Remote support fordesktops onsite and offsite 11.
Network and infrastructure support 12.
Supportfordesktops/ laptops 13.
Server maintenance and backup
314
Infinity Technologies PM
14. Administration of Office365
15. Mobile devices
16. Install/ Configure new Computers and Servers
17. IT procurement processes
18. Printer/ Copier user support ( connectivity for onsite users) Monthly Support
Revised Flat fee for monthly services $ 10, 000
INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT ( SLA)
1. One reach local phone number and email address for emergency support
2. Provide 24x 7 x 365 support
3. Respond to emergencyoutages ( 1) hour during normal business hours
4. Respond toe merge ncyoutages ( 2) hours during no n- business hours
5. In case of an emergency, be onsite within ( 4) hours
6. Provide unlimited technical phone support
7. Trouble Tickets wi I I be acknowledged within ( 30) minutes during norm a I business hours
8. Typica I response time during norm a I business hours a. Password reset ( 15) minutes
b. Create new user (1) hour
c. Installing desktop application ( 1) hour
d. Troubleshoot/ Desktop repair( 30) minutes
e. Adding desktop printer ( 15) minutes
06 315
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
DATE( MMIDDIYYYY)
05/ 05/ 2021
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER( S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATIONIS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement( s).
PRODUCER CONTACT
NUTMEG INS AGENCY INC/ 50 PLUS/ PHS
76210773
NAME:
PHONE ( 888) 925- 3137
A/C, No, Ext):
FAX ( 888) 443- 6112
A/C, No):
The Hartford Business Service Center
3600 Wiseman Blvd E- MAIL
San Antonio, TX 78251 ADDRESS:
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC#
INSURED INSURERA: Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. 11000
INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
2390 E CAMELBACK RD
Property and Casualty Insurance Company
INSURER B .
of Hartford
34690
PHOENIX AZ 85016 INSURERC:
INSURER D :
INSURER E:
INSURER F :
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
ADDL SUBR
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF POLICY EXP
LIMITS
LTR INSR WVD MMIDDIYYYY MMIDDIY YYY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE 1, 000, 000 CLAIMS -MADE OCCUR DAMAGE TO RENTED 1, 000, 000
PREMISES Ea occurrence
MED EXP ( Any one person) X General Liability 10, 000
A 76 SBU IS1808 01/ 01/ 2021 01/ 01/ 2022 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY 1, 000, 000 GEN' L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE 2, 000, 000 POLICY PRO- Fx LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/ OP AGG 2, 000, 000
JECT
OTHER:
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1, 000, 000
Ea accident
BODILY INJURY ( Per person) ANY AUTO
A
ALL OWNED SCHEDULED
76SBU IS1808 01/ 01/ 2021 01/ 01/ 2022 BODILY INJURY (Per accident) AUTOS
AUTOS HIRED
X
NON -
PROPERTY
OWNED X DAMAGE AUTOS
AUTOS Per accident) UMBRELLA
LIAB OCCUR
EACH OCCURRENCE EXCESS
LIAB CLAIMS - AGGREGATE
MADE
DED
RETENTION $ WORKERS
COMPENSATION X
I
PER OTH- AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY STATUTE ER E.
YIN B L. EACH ACCIDENT 1, 000, 000 ANY
PROPRIETOR/ PARTNER/ EXECUTIVE NIA 76 WEG ZT2604 01/ 01/ 2021 01/ 01/ 2022 OFFICER/ MEMBER EXCLUDED? E. L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE 1, 000, 000 Mandatory in NH) If
yes, describe under E. L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 1, 000, 000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below A
FAILSAFE TECHNOLOGY E OR 76 SBU IS1808 01/ 01/ 2021 01/ 01/ 2022 Each Glitch 1, 000, 000 0
Aggregate 1, 000, 000 DESCRIPTION
OF OPERATIONS/ LOCATIONS/ VEHICLES ( ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) Those usual to the Insured' s Operations. CERTIFICATE
HOLDER CANCELLATION City
of Eastvale SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED 12363 LIMONITE AVE STE 910 BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED MIRA LOMA CA 91752- 3686 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE c
1988-
2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD
25 (2016/ 03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marksof ACORD 316
317
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.11
January 26, 2022
Approve Task Order A6, A7, and A8 in the Amount of $59,000 with JPW Communica3ons for Safety and Connec3vity Project Public Outreach and Economic Development Support
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve Task Order A6 in the amount of $30,200 for Safety and Connec&vity Project Public Outreach; and
2. Approve Task Order A7 in the amount of $9,800 with JPW Communica&ons for Safety and Connectivity Project Videography; and
3. Approve Task Order A8 in the amount of $19,000 for Economic Development Communica&ons Support.
Summary
On February 26, 2020 City Council Approved JPW Communica&ons as a Professional On-Call Services Consultant for the area of Communica&ons and Videography. The approved on-call agreement with JPW is not to exceed $200,000 per fiscal year. $100,000 of that can be used for communica&ons services and $100,000 can be used for videography services. On August 26, 2021, the City Council approved an amendment to increase the not to exceed communica&ons services from $100,000 to $150,000 for fiscal year 2021-22.
Task orders approved in FY 21/22 for JPW under communications services are listed below:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
318
Task Order
A3*
Continued Economic Development Support including
graphics updates, website enhancement, digital
marketing, and new business outreach program.
$55,550
Task Order
A4*
Housing Element/Regional Housing Needs Assessment
Outreach
$31,205
Task Order
A5*
League of California Cities proposed Resolution related to Online Sales Tax Revenue Disbursement
$12,700
Task Order A6 Safety and Connectivity Project Public Outreach $30,200 Task Order A8 Economic Development Communications Support $19,000 Communications Services Fiscal Year Total $148,655
* Task orders A-3, A-4, and A-5 approved by City Council on August 25, 2021.
Task orders approved in FY 21/22 for JPW under videography services in FY 21/22.
Task Order A7
Safety and Connectivity Project Project Videography $9,800 Videography Fiscal Year Total $9,800
Background
Task Order A6 and A7 will aid the City's Safety and Connec&vity Projects planned that includes design and construc&on of mul&-use trails to improve safety and connec&vity for everyone whether in a car, on a bike or on foot. The City is commiAed to a thorough and comprehensive public outreach program from project design through construc&on of the project(s) by seeking input from community, providing technical informa&on in a clear and concise way and keeping proac&ve, twoway communica&on to maximize awareness of the project(s). JPW Communica&ons will assist the City in doing so by preparing strategic communica&ons plan, assis&ng in community workshop(s) and developing an informational video.
Task Order A8 will help in the crea&on of a trade show booth and suppor&ng collateral for various Economic Development trade shows which include the Interna&onal Conference of Shopping Centers, which is aAended by na&onal retail businesses who are looking to expand to new Ci&es and shopping centers. In addi&on the project includes ongoing support of business aArac&on through the Eastvale Elevates Advertisement Campaign.
Environmental
Approval of the contract is not a project and is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 7 Attract and retain Business
Improve traffic mobility and management throughout the city's major corridors and around the schools
Fiscal Impact
There is sufficient amount budgeted in account 210-510-6490-92012 for Task Orders A6 and A7 and Economic Development account 100-301-6422 for Task Order A8. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
319
Prior City Council/Commission Action
February 26, 2020 City Council approved the On-Call Professional Services Consultants which included JPW Communications.
August 25, 2021 City Council approved task orders A3,A4 and A5 and approved an amendment to increase the not to exceed amount for communica&ons services from $100,000 to $150,000 for fiscal year 2021-22.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Staff Report for RFQ On-Call 1
Attachment 2 - JPW Communications Agreement
Attachment 3 - Task Order A-6 Communications
Attachment 4 - Task Order A-7 Videography
Attachment 5 - Task Order A-8 Economic Development Communications 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
320
Return to Agenda
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
February 26, 2020
City Council Business
Agenda Item No. 12.1
Selection of Professional On-Call Services Proposals
Prepared By: Gina Gibson-Williams, Community Development Director Recommended Actions
1. Approve the recommended consultants to provide on-call professional services to the City as needed; and
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements for on-call professional services with the selected consultants for their respective categories for a term not-to-exceed 3 years with the potential for two one year extensions in amounts not-to-exceed $100,000 per fiscal year, or $250,000 per fiscal year for the categories of Landscape Architecture, Street Design for Major Corridors, Downtown Urban Design, MultiUse Trail Design, and Circulation and Transportation Planning and Design, subject to review and approval of the agreements by the City Attorney.
Summary
The City needs technical expertise in several disciplines to advance the goals and policies of the Mayor and City Council outlined in the City’s Strategic Plan. On-call professional services in specific discipline categories will maximize expertise, experience, and mobilize that expertise on short notice under pre-negotiated, competitive procurement terms and conditions to address needs as they occur. City staff identified several specialty areas of professional expertise to prepare innovative solutions as a blueprint for the built environment for Eastvale’s future. We are creating and building tomorrow, today. The City of Eastvale requested Statements of Professional Qualifications from interested parties to provide expertise for the following on-call areas of expertise:
x Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis – To inform decision-makers of potential impacts to the City’s General Fund. Firms are expected to provide economic analysis, real estate market research, fiscal financial analysis for General Plan Amendment and Zone Change requests. 321
02/26/2020 City Council Meeting - Item No. 12.1 Page 2
x Economic Data Analysis and Land Use – To achieve the highest and best use of remaining land in the City, it is necessary to imagine new ways to think about and visualize land use. Firms will be expected to utilize urban design and economics to explain and visualize market dynamics created by tax and land use policies. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan update. x Downtown Master Planning and Urban Design– Firms will be expected to prepare a Downtown Urban Design Plan to facilitate and encourage development and improvements that help realize the community’s vision for a viable Downtown and entertainment district. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan update.
x Landscape Architecture - Firms will be expected to design and review landscape architecture plans and projects to create livable and memorable spaces and placemaking for Eastvale. x Streetscape Design for Major Corridors – Streetscape treatments are meant to enhance and unify the visual and spatial experience of people that drive, walk or ride a bicycle or bus, and help provide key linkages between streets residences and businesses and create a sense of arrival and branding.
A comfortable experience through the streetscape pattern gives the user a sense of direction and a sense of place. Firms will be expected to provide consultation and design of streetscape treatments for major corridors, interchanges, freeways, gateway and entry statements, street furniture, paving and lighting concepts, public signs, banners and wayfinding and identity. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan update. x Multi-use Trail Design -Firms will be expected to design multi-use trails that provides a safe means of travel for people that ride bicycles and walk. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan update.
x Circulation and Transportation Planning and Design – Firms will be expected to develop an overall circulation plan to provide convenient access to and within the city for all transportation modes.
This multi-modal approach recognizes the importance of moving and connecting people whether they are driving, riding a bicycle, walking or riding a bus. x Placemaking – Firms will be expected to be able to plan, program, implement, “activate” and create places for people and businesses to connect and prosper. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan update.
x Conceptual Rendering and Visualization – Firms will be expected to bring draft concepts and turn 2D into reality for public input and engagement. “A picture is worth a thousand words.” Knowledge of architecture, placemaking, landscape architecture, streetscape, and transportation/mobility is highly desirable.
x Appraisal Services – To aid the development process, it may be necessary to purchase property or obtain right of way to facilitate development. Firms will be expected to provide appraisal services 322
02/26/2020 City Council Meeting - Item No. 12.1 Page 3
that allow the City to evaluate land and make land-use decisions based on an unbiased professional opinion of valuation.
x Grant writing -Firms will be expected to research, write and submit grant proposals that are unique to Eastvale to include but are not limited to public safety, planning, infrastructure, transportation, and landscape.
x Videography – Firms will be expected to produce innovative videos to engage public input and tell Eastvale’s story. This product may be used for the Eastvale State of the City and the 10th Anniversary of Incorporation.
x Communications – Firms will be expected to assist the City with strategically disseminating information to the public using, social media, press releases, newsletters and other forms of communication to enhance community engagement. This product may be used for the Eastvale General Plan Update.
x Arborist- Firms will be expected to provide services in the cultivation, management, and care of trees in accordance with the City’s draft Tree Preservation Ordinance. The City is only seeking consulting arborist services through this RFQ. The services will not involve any tree planting, pruning, or other tree maintenance or care.
x Housing – Firms will be expected to research and prepare a policy-level document that provides a visionary, sustainable housing strategy for Eastvale’s present and future needs that is compliant with State Housing Law. This product may be used for the City’s General Plan update. x Financial advising – Firms will be expected to provide financing and bond market guidance regarding general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, special issuance bonds, public private partnerships, and lease-purchase agreements. Develop and recommend financing structure options, including preparation of financial analysis and plans. Assist with the development of credit rating strategies.
x Accounting services- Firms will be expected to provide intermediate and complex reconciliations, bank reconciliations, journal entry preparation, and maintenance of effort calculations. State reporting including AB1600 development impact fee reporting, California State Controller reports (street report, financial transaction report). Audit schedule preparation including revenue, deposit liabilities, prepaid, deferred revenue, due to/due From, transfers, retention, grants. Interest receivable and unrealized gain/loss allocations.
x Comprehensive Fee Study- Firms will be expected to provide a comprehensive analysis to understand the cost of providing services and quantify subsidized costs for all service areas. 323
02/26/2020 City Council Meeting - Item No. 12.1 Page 4
The benefits of having an on-call contract in place include:
x Technical expertise
x Commitments as-needed for service
x Accelerated procurement and authorization
x Independent and objective assessments
x Consolidates competition and procurement process
x Consultants that bring specialized expertise
x Consultants that are familiar or can quickly become familiar with Eastvale needs and values The City advertised the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in December 2019 and received over 80 proposals. The chart below shows the categories and the number of proposals received per category.
Category Number of Proposals
Landscape Architecture 14
Streetscape Design for Major Corridors 14
Downtown Master Planning and Urban Design 10
Communications 2
Videography 4
Arborist 2
Multi-use Trail Design 6
Circulation and Transportation Planning and Design 4
Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis 4
Economic Data Analysis and Land Use 4
Accounting Services 2
Placemaking 7
Conceptual Rendering and Visualization 3
Comprehensive Fee Study 1
Housing 2
Financial Advising 1
Grant Writing 3
Appraisal Services 0
Background
An RFQ allows pre-qualified experts to be responsive to support the City’s Strategic Plan and delivery of services. Proposals were accepted from December 3, 2019, through December 19, 2019. The City reviewed the statements of qualifications, assessed the firms, and is recommending that agreements for on-call professional services be entered into with the following professional consulting firms for each category:
Subject Firm(s) selected for on-call services
Landscape Architecture Community Works Design Group, Conceptual Design & Planning Company, Lynn Capouya Inc., and Schmidt Design Group
Streetscape Design for Major Corridors Kimley Horn, Mark Thomas, MIG, Sargent Town Planning, 324
02/26/2020 City Council Meeting - Item No. 12.1 Page 5
and Studio One Eleven
Downtown Master Planning & Urban Design Kimley Horn, KTGY, MIG, Sargent Town Planning, and Studio One Eleven
Communications DeGrave and JPW Communications
Videography DeGrave, JPW, and Windsong
Arborist Richard Fisher Associates and Rincon
Multi-use Trail Design Community Works Design Group, Fehr & Peers, Mark Thomas, and RRM Design Group
Circulation & Transportation Planning & Design Fehr & Peers, Kimley Horn, and Webb Associates Economic & Fiscal Impact Analysis HDL and Kosmont
Economic Data Analysis & Land Use Kosmont and Urban 3
Accounting Services Rahban CPA
Placemaking Conceptual Design & Planning Company, Sargent Town Planning, Schmidt Design Group, Studio One Eleven, and
Team Better Block
Conceptual Rendering & Visualization KOA, KTGY, and KTUA Comprehensive Fee Study Revenue Cost Specialists
Housing Placeworks
Financial Advising Kosmont
Grant Writing California Consulting, KOA, and Webb Associates Strategic Plan Action – Priority Level: 1A | Target #: 4 | Goal #: 1 Strengthen organizational development and effectiveness Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact at this time. The recommended not-to-exceed amount for each agreement is $100,000 per fiscal year for each discipline category except for the following categories, which are recommended for not to exceed amounts of $250,000 per fiscal year:
x Landscape Architecture
x Street Design for Major Corridors
x Downtown Urban Design
x Multi-Use Trail Design
x Circulation and Transportation Planning and Design
The master contracts do not guarantee work to any of the on-call consultants. The master contracts are good for three years with the ability for two one year extensions, as warranted. Work will be authorized as needed by the City subject to funding availability. All individual tasks and project contracts will be negotiated and executed in accordance with the Purchasing Ordinance approved by the City Council on June 26, 2019. 325
02/26/2020 City Council Meeting - Item No. 12.1 Page 6
Prior City Council Action
There is no prior action associated with this request.
Attachments
1. Due to file size, if you are interested in a copy of one of the proposals, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].
326
AGREEMENT FOR ON- CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES]
This Agreement for On- Call Professional Services (" Agreement") is entered into as of this day of 202(| by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation ("City") and JPW Communications, LLC, a California limited liability company Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for qualifications the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of its qualifications for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term ofthis Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term offive years.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform communications and videography services ( hereinafter, the " Services") as requested and authorized by the City. When the City desires to utilize Contractor for Services, the City will issue a Task Order that includes a Scope ofServices to be performed and the compensation to be paid for the Services within the Task Order. Each Task Order shall be attached to this Agreement in Exhibit " A" ( e. g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit " A- 1", the second Exhibit A- 2," etc.). Each Task Order is made a part of this Agreement by this reference. b) Schedule of Performance. The Services authorized by each Task Order shall be completed pursuant to the schedule stated in the Task Order. Should the 1 - 327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
Item Type Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
Service [REDISCOVERY INTERNAL EXERCISE]
Public outreach re-discovery with the project team to
understand project goals and public participation goals.
1.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Service [STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN]: Prepare a strategic communications plan that will outline standardized messaging, key message points, calls to action, and an outreach strategy with consistent messaging to see the highest engagement rate
1.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00
Service [VIDEO/EDITING]: Develop a video concept, write script and storyboard for a 90- second to 2-minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot filming and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of graphics, and voiceover
1.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00
Service [PROJECT MANAGEMENT]: Team meetings, project oversight, program work to keep outreach on track
1.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00
Estimate Total $18,600.00
From JPW Communications
2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Estimate ID 153
Issue Date 10/08/2021
Subject City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity Outreach
354
Item Type Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
Service [PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT/STRATEGIC PLAN]
Execute outreach engagement plan including all touchpoints leading up to community meeting. Includes the creation of PPT presentation, meeting invite, creation of a FAQ, coordination of speakers, creation of a hybrid meeting model including, in- person meeting coordination including a run-of-show, meeting moderation, assistance with needed outreach material, website updates, and social media posts to support public meetings
1.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Service [PROJECT MANAGEMENT]
Team meetings, project oversight, program of work to keep outreach on track
1.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
Estimate Total $11,600.00
From JPW Communications
2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Estimate ID 178
Issue Date 01/19/2022
Subject City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity Outreach
355
Item Type Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
Service Establish video concept, write script and storyboard for a 2- minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot, filming, and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of video graphics, and voiceover. (2) rounds of edits without incurring additional hourly costs.1.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00 Estimate Total $9,800.00
From JPW Communications
2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Estimate ID 179
Issue Date 01/19/2022
Subject City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity PSA
356
Item Type Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
Service [Graphic services for tradeshow booth] - Creation of all graphics for modular booth - Brochure creation
- PPT or video for booth display
1.00 $9,800.00 $9,800.00
Service Google ad buy for restaurant and retail space including the promotion and sponsorship of blog posts
1.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Product [Project management] - As needed project and account oversight to execute initiatives
1.00 $3,200.00 $3,200.00
Estimate Total $19,000.00
Notes
ESTIMATE DISCLAIMER. Any estimate provided is merely an opinion of possible costs that could be encountered, based on the knowledge and experience of the project manager. The estimate is NOT a guarantee for work to be carried out.
From JPW Communications
2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Estimate ID 174
Issue Date 01/19/2022
Subject City of Eastvale Economic Development
Community Outreach Support
357
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.12
January 26, 2022
Second Reading of an Ordinance Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets.
Summary
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the ac)ons of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than arbitrary methods.
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, and July 11, 2018. Each street segment is assigned a number for tracking purposes, and not all segments are updated at the same )me. Out of forty-six (46) total street segments, staff determined that it is necessary to update the thirty-seven (37) street segments for the following reasons:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
358
1. Establish the speed limit for new segments:
1. Hellman Ave between Limonite Ave and North City Limit
2. Mission Blvd between S Milliken Ave and Ontario Freeway (I-15)
3. Scholar Way between Limonite Ave and Bellegrave Ave – Segment 43
2. Segments that required resurveying in order to ensure that the speed limits are appropriate, current, and enforceable:
1. 58th St between Scholar Way and Hamner Ave – Segment 1
2. 65th St between Sumner Ave and Hamner Ave – Segments 3
3. 65th St between Hamner Ave and Wells Spring St - Segment 4
4. 68th St between Sumner Ave and Hamner Ave – Segment 5
5. 68th St between Hamner Ave and East City Limit - Segment 6
6. Archibald Ave between Bluff St and Wind River/Grapewin St – Segment 7
7. Archibald Ave between Wind River/Grapewin St and Schleisman Rd - Segment 8
8. Archibald Ave between Schleisman Rd and Bellegrave Ave - Segment 9
9. Baron Rd between Archibald Ave and Northerly Termius – Segment 10
10. Bellegrave Ave between Sumner Ave and Hamner Ave – Segment 11
11. Bellegrave Ave between Hamner Ave and East City Limit - Segment 12
12. Blossom Way between Harrison Ave and Sumner Ave – Segment 13
13. Chandler St between Hellman Ave and Hamner Ave – Segment 14
14. Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Hamner Ave – Segment 15
15. Fieldmaster St between Hall Rd and Archibald Ave – Segment 16
16. Hamner Ave between South City Limit and Schleisman Rd – Segment 18
17. Hamner Ave between Schleisman Rd and Limonite Ave - Segment 19
18. Hamner Ave between Limonite Ave and Bellegrave Ave - Segment 20
19. Harrison Ave between Chandler St and Schleisman Rd – Segments 24
20. Harrison Ave between Schleisman Rd and Blossom Way - Segment 25
21. Hellman Ave between River Rd and Chandler St – Segment 26
22. Hellman Ave between Chandler St and Limonite Ave - Segment 27
23. Orange St between Sumner Ave and Scholar Way – Segment 32
24. Prairie Smoke Rd between Hellman Ave and Whitewell Rd – Segment 33
25. River Rd between Hellman Ave and Archibald Ave – Segment 34
26. Riverboat Dr between Massy Harrison Way and Wells Springs St – Segment 35
27. Schleisman Rd between Hellman Ave and Archibald Ave – Segment 37
28. Schleisman Rd between Archibald Ave and Sumner Ave - Segment 38
29. Schleisman Rd between Sumner Ave and Scholar Way - Segment 39
30. Schleisman Rd between Scholar Way and Hamner Ave - Segment 40
31. Scholar Way between Schleisman Rd and Limonite Ave – Segment 42
32. Sumner Ave between Citrus St and 65th St – Segment 44
33. Sumner Ave between 65th St and Bellegrave Ave - Segment 45
34. Whitewell Rd between Schleisman Rd and Prairie Smoke Rd – Segment 46 Background
Since the City Council approved the Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, three subsequent amendments were approved. The Engineering Division determined that it is necessary to study thirty-seven (37) street segments. In accordance with State law, the Engineering and Traffic Survey involves three major elements of data collection and analysis: (1) spot speed radar survey; (2) collision rate analysis; and (3) roadway segment field review to iden)fy any roadway characteris)cs 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
359
not readily apparent to motorists. The recommended speed limits are based on these elements. The study and recommended speed limits have also been reviewed and approved by the Riverside Sherriff who provides contract safety services to Eastvale.
Thirty-seven (37) street segments within the City’s arterial and collector street network were surveyed or resurveyed. The California Vehicle Code requires speed limits to be set near the 85 th
percen)le speed for arterial and collector streets. Based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these thirty-seven (37) segments is shown below:
Segment No. Location Between
Current
Speed
Limit(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
1 58th Street
Scholar Way and
Hamner Avenue
35 35
3 65th Street
Sumner Avenue
and Hamner
Avenue
40 40
4 65th Street
Hamner Avenue
and East City Limit
35 35
5 68th Street
Sumner Avenue
and Hamner
Avenue
45 45
6 68th Street
Hamner Avenue
and East City
Limits
45 45
7 Archibald
Avenue
Bluff Street and
Wind
River/Grapewin
Street
55 55
8 Archibald
Avenue
Wind
River/Graphewin
Street and
Schleisman Road
50 50
9 Archibald
Avenue
Schleisman Road
and Bellegrave
Avenue/North City
Limit
50 50
10 Baron Road
Archibald Avenue
and Northernly
Terminus
35 35
11 Bellegrave
Avenue
Sumner Avenue
and Hamner
Avenue
50 50
12 Bellegrave
Avenue
Hamner Avenue
and East City Limit
50 50
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
360
13 Blossom Way
Harrison Avenue
and Sumner
Avenue
30 30
14 Chandler Street
Hellman Avenue
and Harrison
Avenue
45 45
15 Citrus Street
Harrison Avenue
and Hamner
Avenue
45 45
16 Fieldmaster
Street
Hall Road and
Archibald Avenue
40 40
18 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit
and Schleisman
Road
50 45
19 Hamner Avenue
Schleisman Road
and Limonite
Avenue
45 45
20 Hamner Avenue
Limonite Avenue
and Bellegrave
Avenue
45 45
24 Harrison Street
Chandler Street
and Schleisman
Road
45 45
25 Harrison Street
Schleisman Road
and Bellegrave
Avenue
45 45
26 Hellman Avenue
River Road and
Chandler Street
50 50
27 Hellman Avenue
Chandler Street
and Limonite
Avenue
50 50
28 Hellman Avenue
Limonite Avenue
to North City Limit
None 35
31 Mission
Boulevard
S. Milliken Avenue
and Ontario
Freeway (I-15)
None 55
32 Orange Street
Sumner Avenue
and Scholar Way
30 30
33 Prairie Smoke
Road
Hellman Avenue
and Whitewell
Road
35 35
34 River Road
Hellman Avenue
and Archibald
Avenue
40 40
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
361
35 Riverboat Drive
Massy Harris Way
and Wells Springs
Street
40 40
37 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue
and Archibald
Avenue
50 50
38 Schleisman Road
Archibald Avenue
and Sumner
Avenue
45 45
39 Schleisman Road
Sumner Avenue
and Scholar Way
45 45
40 Schleisman Road
Scholar Way and
Hamner Avenue
45 45
42 Scholar Way
Schleisman Road
and Limonite
Avenue
35 40
43 Scholar Way
Limonite Avenue
and Bellegrave
Avenue
None 40
44 Sumner Avenue
Citrus Street and
65th Street
45 45
45 Sumner Avenue
65th Street and
Bellegrave Avenue
45 45
46 Whitewell Road
Schleisman Road
and Prairie Smoke
Road
35 35
One important factor that was considered in seHng the speed limits was the California Assembly Bill (AB) 43 that was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sec)ons and adds new sec)ons to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sec)ons of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022. Details of these CVC criteria and modifica)ons are provided in the Engineering and Traffic Survey report. One addi)on to the CVC, Sec)on 22358.8 allows the local authority to retain the current speed limit if that speed limit was established by an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the sec)on of highway and determined that no addi)onal general purpose lanes have been added since the comple)on of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
Unfortunately, this CVC sec)on does not apply to the segment on Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue and the speed limit must be increased since the sec)on between Schleisman Road and 68th Street now has 4 lanes instead of the 2 lanes it had at the )me of the speed limit establishment in 2013.
In order for the courts to uphold speeding )ckets wriKen by the Eastvale Police Department, each )cket must be able to withstand the scru)ny of the courts. This Engineering and Traffic Survey contains documents with sufficient informa)on in compliance with State law to jus)fy the posted speed limit. Once the ordinance is adopted, the corresponding changes to the posted speed limits on the affected streets will be modified.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
362
Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 7 Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addi)onal speed limit signs need to be installed at various loca)ons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is es)mated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, and July 11, 2018.
On January 12, 2022 the City Council unanimously voted to introduce the Ordinance amending Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale Speed Zone Survey Amendment (E&TS Rpt) Final Draft Attachment 2 - Ordinance 22-XX
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
363
2013
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
Adopted on July24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 2015-14
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 18-09
Adopted on January XX, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-XX
Approved By:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650
Date
* Contract services provided by Interwest Consulting Group 364
365
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 4
3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 8
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 11
4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12
4.1 Speed Limit Signing 13
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14
5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance 15
APPENDIX
APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Sheets
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
366
367
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for thirty-seven (37) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network. The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.
The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.
This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied and that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria. California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, but they do not take effect until the next revision of the CA MUTCD is approved.
On July 10, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015 and July 11, 2018.
Since the 2018 approval of the speed surveys, the following thirty-seven (37) street segments have been studied.
1. 58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
368
Introduction
2 3. 65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
4. 65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street
5. 68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
6. 68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
7. Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street
8. Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road
9. Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit
10. Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus
11. Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
12. Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
13. Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
14. Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue
15. Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue
16. Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
18. Hamner Avenue between South City Limit and Schleisman Road
19. Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue
20. Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue
24. Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road
25. Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way
26. Hellman Avenue between River Road and Chandler Street
27. Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue
28. Hellman Avenue between Limonite Avenue and the North City Limit
29. Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15)
32. Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
33. Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road
34. River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
35. Riverboat Drive between Massy Harrison Way and Wells Springs Street
37. Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
38. Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue
39. Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
40. Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
42. Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue
43. Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue
44. Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street 369
Introduction
3 45. Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
46. Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road The segments below were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for new segments:
Hellman Avenue – Segment 28
Mission Boulevard – Segment 29
Scholar Way – Segment 43
2. Segments that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable:
58th Street – Segment 1
65th Street – Segments 3 & 4
68th Street – Segments 5 & 6
Archibald Avenue – Segments 7 – 9
Baron Road – Segment 10
Bellegrave Avenue – Segments 11 & 12
Blossom Way – Segment 13
Chandler Street – Segment 14
Citrus Street – Segment 15
Fieldmaster Street – Segment 16
Hamner Avenue – Segments 18 – 20
Harrison Avenue – Segments 24 & 25
Hellman Avenue – Segments 26 & 27
Orange Street – Segment 32
Prairie Smoke Road – Segment 33
River Road – Segment 34
Riverboat Drive – Segment 35
Schleisman Road – Segments 37 – 40
Scholar Way – Segment 42
Sumner Avenue – Segments 44 & 45
Whitewell Road – Segment 46
This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the selected thirty-seven (37) roadway segments within the City of Eastvale based on the data and results obtained.
At thirty-seven (37) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD 2014 (rev 6). Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required 370
Introduction
4 “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E. 371
Study Methodology
5 SECTION 2.0
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
The study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 6. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for thirty-seven (37) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. 372
Study Methodology
6 Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the thirty-seven (37) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 (three years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.
Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.
Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:
Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.
Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.
The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:
A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.
A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Collision Data on California State Highways (roads miles, travel, collisions) published by Caltrans every two years. The latest edition, 2018, was used for this 2021 analysis.
The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:
Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years 373
Study Methodology
7 Where: Number of mid-block collisions based on 3 years (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43 modified certain sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and also pertains to certain sections of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Some of the modified sections of the CVC became effective on January 1, 2021, whereas the relevant sections of the CA MUTCD do not go into effect until the CA MUTCD is updated. AB 43 created new CVC Section 22358.8, which, as of January 1, 2022, allows local authorities to maintain the current speed limit if they determine that the speed limit based on the 85th percentile speed is more than is reasonable or safe, and certain conditions are met. Details are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 22358.8 was applied to two street segments in order to maintain the existing speed limits.
374
Survey Results
9 SECTION 3.0
SURVEY RESULTS
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey
Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.
The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.
Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the thirtyseven (37) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
Posted speed limit
Direction of survey
Date and time of speed survey
Weather conditions
Number of vehicles observed in each direction
Speed of each surveyed vehicle
15th percentile speed
50th Percentile speed
85th Percentile speed
10 mph pace speed
Percent over pace speed
Percent in pace speed
Percent under pace speed
Average speed
The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 375
10 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(April, June, July & September 2021)
No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments3
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 22 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 23 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 56 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 1112
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 217 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue N/S & E/W None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 119 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 121 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 222 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 223 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 2425
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 2627
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 28 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian :& bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic 2930 Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage, no bike lanes 31 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) E/W None2 59 55 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.833 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 134 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.835 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 236 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduce - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 138 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 239 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 240 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 4142 43
Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road N/S 35 39 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None2 43 40 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 4445
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1 Roadway segments that have not expired, and therefore are not being updated, are highlighted in gray.2 Three segments, currently studied (Nos. 28, 31 and 43), did not previously have speed limits set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey.3 See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA law, AB 43. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 376
11 Survey Results
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis
The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the roadway segments was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”
It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. All but three (3) of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, indicating that only three (3) of the roadway segments qualified for the 5 mph reduction. Segment 19, Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue, had a calculated collision rate of 0.53, which is greater than the Statewide average of 0.41. Segment 32, Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way, had a calculated collision rate of 1.78, which is greater than the Statewide average of 1.60. Lastly, Segment 46, Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road, had a calculated collision rate of 3.06, which is greater than the Statewide average of 1.60.
The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.
Example:
Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 106
Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue:
Collision Rate = 10 x 106
18,890 x 365 x 1.00 x 3
= 0.48 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)
377
12 The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2018 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the thirty-seven (37) segments studied in the 2021 analysis, and are as follows:
No. Street Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 1.60
3 65th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.93
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 1.60
5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.32
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.93
7 8
9 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 0.93 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.29
Schleisman Road and Bellegrave / North City Limit 0.98
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 1.60 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.78 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.93
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.60
14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 0.91 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.93 16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 1.32 18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.98 19 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.41
20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91
24 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 0.93 25 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 0.93
26 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 1.32
27 28
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 0.93
Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.91
31 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.86 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 1.60
33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 1.60 34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.32
35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Spring Street 1.32 37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.98 38 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.93
39 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 1.32
40 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.91
42 Scholar Way Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.91 43 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 1.60
44 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 0.93
45 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 0.93
46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 1.60 378
13 Table 2: Collision Analysis1
(Amended December 2021)
No Street Between
Segment Length
(mile)
Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
(3 yr total)
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM)3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 234
65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 5,400 1 0.25 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3755 1 0.24 0.93 No Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 56 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 789
Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20934 7 0.19 1.29 No Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 1112
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3828 1 0.16 0.91 No 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.49 7,885 7,787 7 0.55 0.93 No 16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 17 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 181920212223
Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 19,500 5 0.42Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 2425
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 1.34 7,080 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 26 27 28
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No 2930
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 31 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7806 4 0.62 1.32 No 35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 36 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 37383940
Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 4142 43
Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 5,600 4 1.55 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4721 0 0.00 0.91 No Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6678 1 0.20 1.60 No 4445
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 Roadway segments that have not expired are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 3 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 379
14 Survey Results
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.
The roadway segments were driven by Mrs. Nadia Geesman, P.E., Associate Engineer (contracted through Interwest), who is a registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were recorded as part of the study in Strip Maps Found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.
The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
Collision History
Collision Rate
Average Daily Traffic Volume
Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations Lack of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways Nearby schools and parks
Adjacent land uses
380
Survey Findings and Recommendations
15 SECTION 4.0
SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.
The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered. Most recent collision record (mid-block)
Roadway characteristics
Shoulder condition
Grade
Alignment
Sight Distance
Roadside development and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity
Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Residential density
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. The July 2018-June 2021 Collision Survey Analysis in Table 2 lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 381
Survey Findings and Recommendations
16 4.1 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.
It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.
Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.
Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested. 382
Summary and Conclusions
17 SECTION 5.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 6, Section 2B.13.
2. Daily traffic counts for thirty-six (36) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2021 on February 10 (18 segments), February 11 (7 segments), February 17 (1 segment), July 22 (3), July 29 (5) and September 14 (2).
Radar speed surveys were taken in 2021 on February 12 (2 segments), February 17 (17 segments), February 18 (7 segments), July 22 (3), July 29 (5) and September 14 (2). The daily traffic count and radar speed survey for new Segment 28, Hellman Avenue between Limonite Avenue and North City Limit, which is shared with the City of Chino, was collected by the City of Chino for the Engineering and Traffic Survey they were concurrently updating. The daily traffic count was collected on April 6, 2021 and the radar speed survey was taken on April 21, 2021.
3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.
4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.
5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on the thirty-seven (37) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should remain unchanged except for the roadway segments listed on the next page.
383
Summary and Conclusions
18 Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and
Schleisman Road 50 MPH 45 MPH Decrease Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1
28 Hellman Avenue Limonite Avenue and North
City Limit None 35 MPH Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, Option 1
31 Mission
Boulevard
S Milliken Avenue and Ontario
Freeway (I-15) None 55 MPH Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, Option 2
42 Scholar Way Schleisman Road and Limonite
Avenue 35 MPH 40 MPH Increase Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 2
43 Scholar Way Limonite Avenue and
Bellegrave Avenue None 40 MPH Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, Option 1
5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance
Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as follows:
384
385
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX (DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED
LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 DRAFT
386
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 17 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 41 18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 19 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
21 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55
22 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 55
23 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 55
24 25
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
26 27
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
28 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
29 30
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 52
31 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 36 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 47
37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 38 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
39 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
40 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
41 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 39
42 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
43 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
44 45
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 (b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above-listed streets are set forth herein.
DRAFT
387
Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.
The following speed limits are as established:
No. Street Between (mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 17 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 19 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
21 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
22 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
23 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
24 25
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
26 27
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
28 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
29 30
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
31 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 36 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
DRAFT
388
37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 38 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
39 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
40 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
41 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
42 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
43 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
44 45
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this _____ day of January, 2022. _______________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
____________________________ _____________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
DRAFT
389
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donahue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the ____ day of January, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of January, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: XX
NOES: XX
ABSENT: XX
ABSTAIN: XX
_____________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
DRAFT
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated January 2022
414
415
1 Appendix A
RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific three-year interval of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2021, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.
In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:
If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.
If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.
Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 416
2 Appendix A
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.
Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.
The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar enforcement.
APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 417
3 Appendix A
40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Maintaining Existing Speed Limit
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.
Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit
22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail 418
4 Appendix A
or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022. Section 22358.7, which is referenced, will not go into effect until 2024, and is, therefore, not included in this document as an applicable CVC section.
Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) (b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning, and became effective on January 1, 2022.):
(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
419
5 Appendix A
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit ahs been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries 420
6 Appendix A
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following 421
7 Appendix A
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Collision records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence 422
8 Appendix A
district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures. d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
423
9 Appendix A
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.
Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
3) When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned 424
10 Appendix A
have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
425
APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated June 2021)
426
427
1 Appendix B
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated June 2021)
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.
The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see
Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 428
2 Appendix B
mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.
Option:
1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f).
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f). 429
3 Appendix B
Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Standard:
430
4 Appendix B
24 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
25 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 26 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.
If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
27 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
28 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. 431
5 Appendix B
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.
B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
29 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
30 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.
Guidance:
31 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report. 32 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
432
6 Appendix B
Support:
33 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
34 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.
Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 35 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.
Option:
36 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
37 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
38 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 39 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
40 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
41 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.
Option:
42 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 43 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
44 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
45 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
433
Standard:
7 Appendix B
46 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
47 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 48 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
49 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.
Standard:
50 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
51 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
Standard:
52 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
53 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 54 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
55 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
434
Standard:
8 Appendix B
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Option:
56 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
57 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
Guidance:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.
Standard:
59 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
60 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
61 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
64 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
65 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
66 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.
Option:
67 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar. 435
9 Appendix B
Guidance:
68 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
69 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
70 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
72 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
73 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
Guidance:
74 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
75 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
76 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 77 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Support:
78 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
79 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
80 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
81 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
82 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
436
10 Appendix B
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
83 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
84 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
85 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
Standard:
86 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
87 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.
Standard:
88 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
90 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
• The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
• Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
• A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law. 437
11 Appendix B
Speed Traps
Support:
92 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
93 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 94 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 95 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
97 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
98 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.
Support:
99 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Standard:
100 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.
An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
101 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
102 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
438
12 Appendix B
Support:
103 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.
Standard:
104 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
105 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part
6. Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
106 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.
Support:
107 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
439
13 Appendix B
Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD
Text Headings
Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.
Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.
Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.
The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.
Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.
Words and Phrases
Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed—the summation of the instantaneous or spot-measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.
Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85thpercentile speeds. (e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
440
14 Appendix B
Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.
Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.
Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)—the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.
Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.
Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.
CVC – California Vehicle Code.
Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.
Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.
Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.
Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 441
15 Appendix B
exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.
Engineering Study—the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.
Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.
Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.
Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).
Pedestrian Facilities—a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.
Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.
Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared-use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
442
16 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.
Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.
Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
443
APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated December 2021)
444
445
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586
0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
446
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
447
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642
0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
448
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260
1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
449
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
450
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700
1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
451
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580
1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
452
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010
1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
453
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030
0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Cul-de-sac near River Road.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
454
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650
1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.
Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
455
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575
0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
456
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comments:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
457
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075
1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
458
Location: Citrus Street Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Harrison Avenue to Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 15 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
5 0.39, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction between Harrison and Sumner and between Scholar and Hamner. 2WB/1EB e/o Sumner to w/o Scholar.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
7,885
1.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
459
Location: Fieldmaster Street Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue Segment No.: 16 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curves.
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
460
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road Segment No.: 18 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295
0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
461
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue Segment No.: 19 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
462
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue Segment No.: 20 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800
0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway width reductions.
Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
463
Location: Harrison Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road Segment No.: 24 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
464
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Blossom Way
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 25
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080
1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
465
Location: Hellman Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: River Road & Chandler Street Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100
0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
466
Location: Hellman Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue Segment No.: 27 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120
1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
467
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070
0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
468
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 31
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.
Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
469
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
470
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380
0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
471
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 34
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970
0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.
Agricultural land west of Hall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
472
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500
0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
473
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
474
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
475
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
476
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040
0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
477
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
478
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700
0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.
Roadway Geometrics:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
479
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935
1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
480
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422
1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
481
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542
0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.
Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
482
483
APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated December 2021)
484
485
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE
0.49 mi
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET
UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North SCHOLAR WAY JAMESTOWN AVENUE HAMNER AVENUE • 35 MPH 486
487
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)
0.31 mi
RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North 35 MPH • HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST • 35 MPH 488
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North SUMNER AVENUE SCHOLAR WAY HAMNER AVENUE 68TH STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
489
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET
0.5 mi
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST I-15 INTERSTATE HWY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •
WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
490
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET
1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
RIVER STREET
ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
RIVER RD
WIND
BARON
ROAD
BLUFF
GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD
55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
491
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD WIND RIVER RD
GRAPEWIN
STREET
CHANDLER STREET
FIELDMASTER
STREET
SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK EASTVALE
PKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
492
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North INDUSTRIAL
ARCHI BALD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
50 MPH • 50 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
493
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North INDUSTRIAL
ARCHI BALD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
50 MPH • 50 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
494
495
496
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT
0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •
CITY LIMIT BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL INTERSTATE HWY
CITY LIMIT
497
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BLOSSOM WAY
HARRISIN AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.5 mi
BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE CEDAR CREEK ROAD SUMNER AVENUE 30 MPH • • 30 MPH
REDSIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 30 MPH • PINE GROVE PL
498
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HELLMAN AVENUE ARCHIBALD AVENUE HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE
1.53 mi
RESIDENTIAL • 45 MPH
SELBY AVENUE
SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
499
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE SUMNER AVENUE HAMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1.49 mi
• 45 MPH
SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
HIGH
SCHOOL
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
500
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
FIELDMASTER STREET
HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi
RESIDENTIAL
FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
E
K
RD
C
H
E
R
R
Y
MEADOW
BROOK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK
HALL RD
ARCHIBALD AVE
501
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NorthRIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
FAIR GROUNDS
PARK RESIDENTIAL
502
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 65TH STREET 45 MPH • 45 MPH • 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
503
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER
HAMNER AVENUE
0.91 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH
SWAN LAKE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
• 45 MPH
AVENUE
45 MPH •
COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
504
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI): CHANDLER STREET
North
HARRISON AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH
NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
505
506
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD TO
0.97 mi
CONSERVATION
AREA
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMITS
RIVER ROAD
CHANDLER STREET
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1) 50 MPH •
UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED
CHANDLER STREET 507
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMIT
CHANDLER STREET
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
UNDEVELOPED 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • 50 MPH •
SCHOOL
WALTERS STREET ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKETSTREET
PINE AVENUE PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD LANDERWOOD DRIVE BICKMORE AVENUE
1.54 mi
CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE
LIMONITE AVE
PARK INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL CHINO CORONA ROAD KIMBALL AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
508
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE
LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
0.20 mi
HELLMAN AVENUE CHANDLER STREET INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL LIMONITE AVE
INDUSTRIAL SUMMIT DR
INDUSTRIAL HELLMAN AVENU CITY LIMIT ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)
1.54 mi KIMBALL AVENUE
CITY LIMIT INDUSTRIAL
509
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD
MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS (I-15)
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL 60 MPH •
510
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
ORANGE STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL
ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •
SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH
SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
AGRICULTURE RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
RESIDENTIAL
511
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD
0.26 mi
NOT TO SCALE
RESIDENTIAL
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
512
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVER ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
0.75 mi
NOT TO SCALE
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD
HALL ROAD
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
513
514
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
ARCHI BALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •
COMMERCIAL
515
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD
SUMNER
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
HARRISON
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUEAVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
516
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED 45 MPH •
517
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE
0.58 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN
HAMMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
518
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
SCHOLAR WAY
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOLAR
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
LIMONITE AVE
WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
519
520
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET
1.12 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
521
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
1.03 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE 45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
ORCHARD
PARK
SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
522
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
WHITEWELL ROAD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
0.29 mi
NOT TO SCALE
WHITEWELL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH
PRAIRIE
SMOKE RD
523
524
APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated December 2021)
525
526
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 0 0 45 044 0 2 44 X X 2 Time43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:0539 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E33 1 1 33 X X 2 *32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%29 3 1 29 X X X X 428 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%27 1 2 27 X X X 326 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
527
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:3049 1 2 49 X X X 348 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 736 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%35 0 2 35 X X 234 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 1 1 33 X X 232 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
528
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:3049 1 2 49 X X X 348 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 736 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%35 0 2 35 X X 234 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 1 1 33 X X 232 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
529
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:2049 2 2 49 X X X X 448 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 636 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
530
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:2552 1 0 52 X 151 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:5049 1 2 49 X X X 348 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 636 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
531
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:0062 0 1 62 X 161 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:2559 1 2 59 X X X 358 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%47 2 2 47 X X X X 446 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%45 0 1 45 X 144 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH43 0 0 43 042 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
532
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 1 3 59 X X X X 458 4 0 58 X X X X 457 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:0552 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:3049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 744 1 3 44 X X X X 443 1 0 43 X 142 1 0 42 X 141 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
533
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
534
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 1 45 X 144 1 1 44 X X 2 Time43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P32 0 1 32 X 1 A31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 624 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
535
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:2052 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 751 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:4049 0 1 49 X 148 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%37 2 2 37 X X X X 436 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%35 1 1 35 X X 234 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
536
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:4062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:5559 0 0 59 058 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 2 0 56 X X 255 3 2 55 X X X X X 554 0 3 54 X X X 3 *53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13%45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH43 3 2 43 X X X X X 542 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 1 0 40 X 139 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
537
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 0 0 44 0 Time43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:1042 1 0 42 X 141 1 0 41 X 1 Time40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:5039 2 0 39 X X 238 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%25 2 2 25 X X X X 424 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH23 1 0 23 X 122 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
538
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 655 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:4052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:1549 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
539
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:4052 2 0 52 X X 251 2 0 51 X X 2 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:0049 1 1 49 X X 2 *48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%39 1 1 39 X X 238 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
540
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 3 0 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:3042 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:2039 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *34 1 0 34 X 133 3 2 33 X X X X X 532 2 0 32 X X 231 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
541
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:2062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:4059 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 0 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 0 1 56 X 155 1 0 55 X 154 4 2 54 X X X X X X 653 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11%45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH43 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH41 0 3 41 X X X 340 1 0 40 X 139 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH38 0 1 38 X 137 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
542
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:0052 1 3 52 X X X X 451 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:2049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%39 2 0 39 X X 238 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
543
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:5052 1 2 52 X X X 351 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:1049 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%39 1 2 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%37 0 0 37 036 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
544
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 1 58 X 157 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 2 56 X X 255 1 0 55 X 154 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:1052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:3049 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%39 0 1 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
545
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:5052 2 0 52 X X 251 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:2049 4 2 49 X X X X X X 648 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 *38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%37 2 1 37 X X X 336 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
546
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:1562 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:0059 1 2 59 X X X 358 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%45 2 0 45 X X 244 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH43 0 1 43 X 142 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
547
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue)72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:0062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:2559 0 1 59 X 158 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 3 2 56 X X X X X 555 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 *54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69%47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 644 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH43 1 1 43 X X 242 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
548
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
549
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
550
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:2052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:1549 0 1 49 X 148 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH46 3 1 46 X X X X 445 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%35 0 4 35 X X X X 434 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH33 1 2 33 X X X 332 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 1 30 X 129 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
551
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 1 0 47 X 1 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 4 2 45 X X X X X X 644 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:0039 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%29 4 0 29 X X X X 428 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%27 2 2 27 X X X X 426 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%25 3 0 25 X X X 324 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
552
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
553
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:1052 0 0 52 051 0 2 51 X X 2 Time50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:2049 1 2 49 X X X 348 0 1 48 X 1 Existing47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 4 1 46 X X X X X 545 1 0 45 X 144 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH33 2 2 33 X X X X 432 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH31 0 1 31 X 130 0 3 30 X X X 329 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH28 0 0 28 027 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH26 1 0 26 X 125 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
554
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 2 0 55 X X 254 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:1552 1 3 52 X X X X 451 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:3549 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%39 2 0 39 X X 238 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
555
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:3062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:5059 3 2 59 X X X X X 558 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%47 2 1 47 X X X 346 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%45 1 1 45 X X 244 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH43 2 0 43 X X 242 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 1 40 X 139 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
556
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:3052 3 1 52 X X X X 451 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:5049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%39 0 1 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
557
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 1 54 X X 2 Time53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:3552 0 0 52 051 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:5549 3 1 49 X X X X 448 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%37 1 2 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
558
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 2 49 X X 248 0 1 48 X 147 0 1 47 X 1 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:2542 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:0039 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *33 1 0 33 X 132 1 3 32 X X X X 431 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
559
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 1 48 X 147 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 1 3 45 X X X X 444 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:2042 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:4039 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *34 0 4 34 X X X X 433 2 1 33 X X X 332 1 1 32 X X 231 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%29 2 0 29 X X 228 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
560
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:0052 3 2 52 X X X X X 551 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:2549 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
561
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 3 56 X X X 355 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:0052 0 2 52 X X 2 *51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:2049 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 0 1 42 X 141 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%39 1 0 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
562
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 0 1 44 X 1 Time43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 0 0 41 0 Time40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *35 0 2 35 X X 2 P34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 1 3 27 X X X X 426 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
563
564
APPENDIX F
Collision Data Sheets
Updated December 2021
565
566
Mid-Block Collisions
58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
567
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 568
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
569
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
570
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
571
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 572
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 573
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 574
Mid-Block Collisions
Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
575
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 576
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
577
Mid-Block Collisions
Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
578
Mid-Block Collisions
Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 579
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
580
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
(Page 2)
581
Mid-Block Collisions
Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
582
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Citrus Street/South City Limit and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 583
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
584
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 2)
585
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
586
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 2)
(Continued on Next Page)
587
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 3)
588
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
589
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
590
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between River Road and Chandler Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
591
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 592
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Limonite Ave and North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
593
Mid-Block Collisions
Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
594
Mid-Block Collisions
Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
595
Mid-Block Collisions
Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
596
Mid-Block Collisions
River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 597
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverboat Drive between Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
598
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Continued on Next Page)
599
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 2)
600
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 601
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
602
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
603
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
604
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
605
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
606
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP 607
Mid-Block Collisions
Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
608
APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
(Updated June 2021)
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
ORDINANCE NO. 22-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE
10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED
LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
635
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 17 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 41 18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 19 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
21 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55
22 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 55
23 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 55
24 25
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
26 27
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
28 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
29 30
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 52
31 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 36 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 47
37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 38 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
39 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
40 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
41 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 39
42 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
43 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
44 45
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 636
(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the abovelisted streets are set forth herein.
Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.
The following speed limits are as established:
No. Street Between (mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 15 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
16 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 17 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 18 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 19 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
20 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
21 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
22 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
23 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
24 25
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
26 27
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
28 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
29 30
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
31 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 32 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
33 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 637
34 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
35 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 36 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
37 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 38 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
39 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
40 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
41 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
42 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
43 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
44 45
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
46 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this _____ day of January, 2022. __________________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
638
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 22-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 12 of January, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the XX of ______, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
639
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.13
January 26, 2022
Installa(on and Purchase of Surveillance Systems at City Hall Facilities
Prepared By:
Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve the purchase of surveillance systems at City Facili es with Infinity Technologies for a not to exceed cost of $100,000.
2. Waive formal bidding procedures set forth in Municipal Code Section 4.06.070.
Summary
As the City con nues to grow and acquire addi onal facili es, staff is recommending to equip each City facility with a surveillance system to help ensure the safety of our facili es, office equipment, and City staff.
Through our informa on technology (IT) vendor, Infinity Technologies, the City is recommending to purchase Verkada cameras. Verkada's cameras require minimal bandwidth impact, include cloud archiving, and centralized management of the cameras. City staff received three informal quotes for Verkada surveillance systems and Infinity Technologies was found to be the most cost effec ve and fit the technological needs of the City. The City sought informal quotes from the following vendors:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
640
Vendor Amount
Monarch $122,275.74
GHA Technologies, Inc. $100,604.44
Infinity Technologies $93,853.23
Each vendor quote was for the same Verkada surveillance system.
City facilities included under this project are:
1. City Hall
2. The Citrus Property
3. Fire Station #27
4. Fire Station #31
Included in the proposed costs is a 10-year license with the cameras. These cameras are also mobile and can be moved to different City facilities, as needed.
Background
Surveillance cameras work as both a deterrent and a recovery tool. Visible security cameras can oDen deter unwanted aEen on and if crime does occur, security cameras can help gather evidence that can assist police. City Hall is currently the only City facility with a surveillance system.
Sec on 4.06.070 of the Eastvale Municipal Code requires compe ve formal bidding for purchases of goods or nonprofessional services of $25,000 or more. However, Sec on 4.06.080 allows the compe ve bidding requirement to be waived by the City Council when in the best interests of the City. City staff obtained three informal quotes for the system as documented above and the Verkada system was the lowest priced. Also, the Verkada system is recommended by the City's IT vendor due to its features mee ng the City's technological needs. Going through a compe ve formal bidding process is unlikely to yield a different result and would delay the implementa on of this security system. Therefore, it is in the best interests of the City to waive the formal bidding requirement for this purchase.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
The cost for the surveillance system is $93,853.23 and is budgeted in account number 600-290- 6615. Staff is budge ng addi onal funds up to a not to exceed total of $100,000 for any poten al unforeseen equipment expenses.
As part of the project, there is also cabling work that is required and the cost is not expected to exceed $19,000. Infinity Technologies will also perform project management and configura on of the new system for a not to exceed cost of $2,500. These purchases will be approved 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
641
administratively by the City Manager.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
The City Council ini ally approved funding for this project as part of the mid-year budget adjustments at the January 12, 2021, City Council meeting.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Surveillance Camera Quotes.pdf
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
642
Company Address Date 12/21/2021
13200 Citrus St. Eastvale CA Quotation # 101
[email protected] Customer ID COE21
Quotation For
Customer Name Marc Doohue Quotation valid until: 1/20/2022 Company Name:City of Eastvale - Citrus Property Prepared by: Hector Martinez Quote Name: Citrus Property Camera System
Comments or Special Instructions
Salesperson P.O. Number Date Ship Date F.O.B. Point Terms 12/21/2021 Net 30
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 8 Arm Mount $ 89.00 $61.41 Yes $491.28
3 CD51 Indoor Dome Camera, 90 Days $ 1,799.00 $1,241.31 Yes $3,723.93 8 CD51-E Outdoor Camera, 90 Days $ 1,999.00 $1,379.31 Yes $11,034.48 11 10 Year License $ 1,599.00 $1,103.31 Yes $12,136.41
Subtotal $ 27,386.10
If you have any questions concerning this quotation, please contact: Tax Rate 7.75% Hector Martinez - [email protected] Tax $ 2,122.42 Shipping and Handling $ -
Thank you for your business! TOTAL $ 29,508.52
List Price $ 39,690.00
10 Year License
Online Quotation
643
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 644
Company Address Date 12/21/2021
12363 Limonite Ave. Suite 910 Eastvale, CA 91752 Quotation # 101 [email protected] Customer ID COE21
Quotation For
Customer Name Marc Doohue Quotation valid until: 1/20/2022 Company Name:City of Eastvale - City Hall Prepared by: Hector Martinez Quote Name: City Hall Camera System
Comments or Special Instructions
Salesperson P.O. Number Date Ship Date F.O.B. Point Terms 12/21/2021 Net 30
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 5 Arm Mount $ 89.00 $61.41 Yes $307.05
8 CD51 Indoor Dome Camera, 90 Days $ 1,799.00 $1,241.31 Yes $9,930.48 5 CD51-E Outdoor Camera, 90 Days $ 1,999.00 $1,379.31 Yes $6,896.55 13 10 Year License $ 1,599.00 $1,103.31 Yes $14,343.03
Subtotal $ 31,477.11
If you have any questions concerning this quotation, please contact: Tax Rate 7.75% Hector Martinez - [email protected] Tax $ 2,439.48 Shipping and Handling $ -
Thank you for your business! TOTAL $ 33,916.59
List Price $ 45,619.00
10 Year License
Online Quotation
645
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 646
Company Address Date 12/21/2021
7067 Hamner Ave 92880 Quotation # 102
[email protected] Customer ID COE21
Quotation For
Customer Name Marc Doohue Quotation valid until: 1/20/2022 Company Name:City of Eastvale - Fire Station 27 Prepared by: Hector Martinez Quote Name: Fire Station 27 Camera System
Comments or Special Instructions
Salesperson P.O. Number Date Ship Date F.O.B. Point Terms 12/21/2021 Net 30
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 7 Arm Mount $ 89.00 $61.41 Yes $429.87
7 CD51-E Outdoor Dome Camera, 90
Days $ 1,999.00 $1,379.31 Yes $9,655.17
7 10 Year License $ 1,599.00 $1,103.31 Yes $7,723.17
Subtotal $ 17,808.21
If you have any questions concerning this quotation, please contact: Tax Rate 7.75% Hector Martinez - [email protected] Tax $ 1,380.14 Shipping and Handling $ 175.00
Thank you for your business! TOTAL $ 19,363.35
List Price $ 25,809.00
10 Year License
Online Quotation
647
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 648
Company Address Date 12/21/2021
14491 Chandler St 92880 Quotation # 101
[email protected] Customer ID COE21
Quotation For
Customer Name Marc Doohue Quotation valid until: 1/20/2022 Company Name:City of Eastvale - Fire Station 31 Prepared by: Hector Martinez Quote Name: Fire Station 31 Camera System
Comments or Special Instructions
Salesperson P.O. Number Date Ship Date F.O.B. Point Terms 12/21/2021 Net 30
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 4 Arm Mount $ 89.00 $61.41 Yes $245.64
4 CD51-E Outdoor Camera, 90 Days $ 1,999.00 $1,379.31 Yes $5,517.24 4 10 Year License $ 1,599.00 $1,103.31 Yes $4,413.24
Subtotal $ 10,176.12
If you have any questions concerning this quotation, please contact: Tax Rate 7.75% Hector Martinez - [email protected] Tax $ 788.65 Shipping and Handling $ 100.00
Thank you for your business! TOTAL $ 11,064.77
List Price $ 14,748.00
10 Year License
Online Quotation
649
Quantity Description List Price Unit Price Taxable? Amount 650
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.14
January 26, 2022
Purchase of Police Motorcycles
Prepared By:
Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council Approve a purchase order for BMW Motorcycle of Riverside in the amount of $60,830.24 for two 2022 BMW R 1250 RT-P motorcycles for the Police Department and authorize the Acting City Manager to execute any agreements and purchase orders.
Summary
The purchase of two new 2022 BMW R1250 RT-P police motorcycle will provide motorcycles for the two new Motor Depu1es approved at the January 12, 2022 City Council mee1ng. Per sec1on
4.06.080(d) of the City's Municipal Code, the City may u1lize exis1ng agreements with any federal, state, county or other public agency. Riverside County Sheriff has an agreement with BMW Riverside for the purchase, installa1on of equipment, and maintenance for police motorcycles and as a result the purchase of this motorcycle is exempt from the City's bidding requirement.
Background
On January 12, 2022 the City Council approved the addi1on of two new Motor Depu1es, bringing the city's total Motor Deputy staff to four. The city currently operates two motorcycles and one backup. In order to accommodate the two new Motor Depu1es, the City needs to purchase two addi1onal motorcycles. The motorcycles are 2022 BMW R1250 RT-P models. The motorcycles will be ou;i<ed with required equipment including, but not limited to, lidar, lights, radios, and shotgun racks. Approval of this item authorizes the City Manager to purchase the motorcycles from BMW of Riverside. In addi1on to the motorcycles, the two new Motor Depu1es will need to be ou;i<ed with new uniforms, helmets, tablets, and 1cket printers. In total, the equipment costs for the motorcycles and addi1onal equipment will total $90,350. Budget was appropriated at the 2022 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
651
Mid-Year Budget process.
Category Amount
Motorcycles 64,129
Uniforms/Helmets 16,817
Equipment 9,406
Total 90,352
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
The FY 2021-22 budget includes adequate appropria1ons for the motorcycle purchase in the Capital Project Fund under account 600-400-6610. The Capital Project Fund is funded through transfers from the General Fund. Ongoing vehicle maintenance costs are currently budgeted in the General Fund, maintenance budget was increased during the FY 2021-22 Mid-Year process.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - BMW of Riverside Quote
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.15
January 26, 2022
Conduc'ng Council and Commission Mee'ng U'lizing
Teleconferencing
Prepared By:
Erica Vega, City Attorney
Recommended Action(s)
Adopt a resoluon authorizing City Council and Commission meengs to be conducted ulizing teleconferencing, while also allowing in person attendance, under AB 361.
Summary
Due to the current surge in COVID-19 cases, the City Council has reconsidered offering the opon to Council Members, Commissioners, and the public to a)end City Council and Commission meengs via teleconferencing. At its meeng on January 12, 2022, the City Council directed that a teleconference opon be offered under AB 361 in addion to the opon to a)end meengs in person.
Under AB 361 (Government Code secon 54953(e)), the City Council is required to adopt a resoluon making findings within 30 days of meeng via teleconference for the first me and every 30 days therea7er that circumstances warrant ulizing teleconferencing to conduct Council and Commission meetings.
Background
AB 361 allows members of a legislave body to a)end a meeng via teleconference without having to post an agenda at their physical locaon and make that physical locaon accessible to members of the public during a State of Emergency declared by the Governor under the following circumstances:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
661
1. State or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing;
2. The legislave body has determined that meeng in person would present an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees; or
3. The legislave body is meeng to determine whether meeng in person would present an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees.
If teleconferencing for Council and Commissions is authorized, AB 361 requires it to also be offered to members of the public. AB 361 gives the City Council the discreon to determine whether to offer an option to attend meetings in person or to make meetings 100% remote participation.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to restore the use of GoToWebinar at Council and Commission meengs.
The City sll maintains an acve account with GoToWebinar and the fees are $249 per month; budget is located in IT services under account 100-240-6490. Staff has connued to use the so7ware for other meetings.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
April 8, 2020 - City commenced utilizing GoToWebinar for teleconferencing into Council and Commission meetings.
June 23, 2021 - Council provided direction to discontinue use of GoToWebinar for teleconferencing into Council and Commission meetings.
January 12, 2022 - Council directed that the City resume ulizing GoToWebinar for teleconferencing into Council and Commission meetings.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1: AB 361 Resolution
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
662
RESOLUTION NO. 22-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE AUTHORIZING
THE CITY COUNCIL AND CITY COMMISSIONS TO UTILIZE TELECONFERENCING FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC MEETINGS PURSUANT TO AB 361
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of California proclaimed a State of Emergency to exist in California as a result of the threat of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2020, the Governor of California executed Executive Order N25-20 which suspended and modified specified provisions in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section § 54950 et seq.) and authorized local legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meeting accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and address the local legislative body; and
WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the Governor of California executed Executive Order N29-20 which superseded and replaced the provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 related to the Brown Act and teleconferencing; and
WHEREAS, on June 11, 2021, the Governor of California executed Executive Order N-08- 21 which extended the provisions of Executive Order N-29-20 concerning teleconference accommodations for public meetings through September 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the Governor of California signed into law Assembly Bill 361 amending Government Code § 54953 and permitting members of a legislative body to teleconference into a meeting without having to comply with the requirements of subdivision (b)(3) Government Code § 54953 during a proclaimed state of emergency if a) State or local officials are imposing or recommending measures to promote social distancing, or b) the body finds that “as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees;” and
WHEREAS, AB 361 imposes requirements to ensure members of the public are able to attend and participate in public meetings of a legislative body conducted via teleconference, including:
Notice of the means by which members of the public may access the meeting and offer public comment, including an opportunity for all persons to attend via a call-in option or an internet-based service option;
The legislative body shall take no further action on agenda items when there is a disruption which prevents the public agency from broadcasting the meeting, or in the event of a disruption within the local agency’s control which prevents members of the public from offering public comments, until public access is restored; 663
Prohibits the legislative body from requiring public comments to be submitted in advance of the meeting and specifies that the legislative body must provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body and offer comments in real time; Prohibits the legislative body from closing the public comment period until the public comment period has elapsed or until a reasonable amount of time has elapsed; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 54953(e)(3), a legislative body that holds a meeting via teleconference pursuant to AB 361 must reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency and make findings every 30 days to continue to meet via teleconference.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares that the recitals set forth above are true and correct, and incorporated into this resolution as findings of the of the City Council.
SECTION 2. The City of Eastvale continues to follow safety measures in response to COVID-19 as ordered or recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and/or County of Riverside, as applicable. Based upon that guidance, in person attendance indoors at public meetings can present an imminent risk to the health and safety of attendees. The City Council wants to ensure that all persons desiring to attend public meetings may do so in a manner that protects the health and safety of the attendees, their families and other close contacts. As of January 18, 2022, data from CDPH shows that Riverside County has a daily new COVID-19 case rate of 257.5 case per 100,000 in population and a COVID-19 test positivity rate of 31.6%. Statewide, the daily case rate is 270.6 new cases per 100,000 in population and a 21.1% test positivity rate. These numbers are significantly higher than they were prior to the last regular City Council meeting conducted without use of teleconferencing on December 8, 2021, when the statewide daily case rate was 14.5 cases per 100,000 in population and the test positivity rate was 2.2%. Given the current prevalence of COVID-19 statewide and locally, requiring in person attendance to participate Council and Commission meetings would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.
Teleconferencing will provide increased meaningful participation options for both members of the legislative body and members of the public in a manner that protects the health and safety of the attendees, their families and other close contacts.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby declares that, pursuant to the findings in Sections 1 and 2, the City Council and City Commissions are authorized to utilize teleconferencing to conduct public meetings pursuant to AB 361 and Government Code § 54953, as amended thereby. The City Council further directs that members of the legislative body and members of the public be allowed to attend said meetings in person if they so choose.
SECTION 4. Staff is directed to agendize no less than every 30 days Council consideration of the need to continue with teleconferenced meetings as allowed by AB 361. 664
SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 2022. ______________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________ _______________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
665
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 22___, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the 26th day of January, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
666
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 11.16
January 26, 2022
Communications Monthly Summary
Prepared By:
Mollie Kortsen, Communication Specialist
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Communications Monthly Summary.
Summary
The City of Eastvale’s Communica
ons Team works to provide important and valuable informa on
to the community to ensure residents are kept up to date with City occurrences. This informa on is
disseminated through various platforms including the City’s website, social media platforms, and coordinated media releases. A monthly summary is provided to capture the avenues of outreach that are taken to inform Eastvale residents.
Background
The City of Eastvale provides informa
on to cons
tuents through the City’s website, social media
pla#orms, and media releases. The City’s website contains informa on pertaining to City Council
and Commission agendas, minutes, community events, crime preven on, safety
ps, frequently
asked ques
ons, and more. By visi
ng the City’s website, residents can also subscribe to Eastvale’s e-no
fica
on system. Eno
fica
on is a free service provided by City Hall, where subscribers can select the types of no
fica
ons they would like to receive by email. Links are also available to the City’s Facebook, Twi+er, Instagram, and LinkedIn accounts. Addi onally, the City collaborates with
our partner agencies to coordinate press releases that are disseminated using the above networks.
Environmental
Not Applicable.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
667
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Communications Report - Page 1
Attachment 2 - Communications Report - Page 2
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
668
669
670
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Agenda Item No. 12.1
January 26, 2022
Redrawing of Councilmember District Boundaries
Prepared By:
Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Conduct the con
nued public hearing to receive input from the community regarding proposed maps for the redrawing of election district boundaries;
2. Selected a proposed map for adoption; and
3. Con
nue the public hearing to February 9, 2022, for the introduc on of an Ordinance
en
tled: AN ORDINANCE ADJUSTING THE BOUNDARIES OF CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND REDEFINING THE BOUNDARIES OF ALL COUNCIL DISTRICTS OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE.
Summary
Pursuant to Elec
on Code sec
on 21601, ci
es with by-district elec
on systems are required to
redraw their district boundary maps to ensure compliance with the California and federal Vo ng
Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistric
ng requires a minimum of four public hearings
and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority popula ons and communi
es of interest are
aware of the redistric
ng effort and are provided with op
ons to par
cipate. This is the con
nued
fourth public hearing of the four required public hearings, and the third mee ng where dra< and
revised maps are presented. Community workshops was held on November 15, 2021 and December 13, 2021, providing basic redistric
ng informa
on for the community and focused on use of the
online mapping tool.
Background
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
671
Every 10 years, ci
es with by-district elec
on systems must use new census data to review and, if
needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local popula ons have changed. This process, called
redistric
ng, ensures all districts have a nearly equal popula
on. The redistric
ng process for the
City of Eastvale must be completed by April 17, 2022.
The City adopted its current district boundaries in 2016, based on 2010 census data as required by law. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020. One of the key requirements under the Fair Maps Act, and the federal Vo ng Rights Act, is
that districts be popula
on balanced. In addi
on, maps may not inten
onally seek to dilute or
minimize the minority vote and if there is an ability to create majority/minority vo ng districts, the
agency must strive to do so. Currently, the City’s districts vary widely in popula on, a result of the
building boom occurring since the 2010 census, the numbers from which were used to draw the City’s original district boundaries. At present, the popula on devia
on between the least populated
district to the most populated district, as compared to the ideal popula on (1/5 of the total City
popula
on) is 44.5%. One of the goals of redistric
ng is to reduce the total devia
on to as close to
zero as possible, however the courts have ruled that a devia on of 10% or less is generally
acceptable.
The purpose of this public hearing is to share proposed map op ons and receive feedback on the
maps presented. The Council, may, if desired, select a preferred map and direct staff to return at the February 9, 2022 meeting to introduce the ordinance approving the map.
Ini
ally the City’s redistric
ng consultant presented two map op
ons for considera
on, and two
maps were received from the community. At the second and third public hearings, Council requested revisions to certain previously submiIed maps. Specifically, Council requested Map E be reviewed at the January 26, 2022 Public Hearing as submiIed, and that Map Op ons F and H be
revised. Each of those maps is analyzed below.
Map Option E
Map Op
on E is revision to Map Op
on A, which straightens the alignment of Districts 4 and 5 along Archibald Avenue. The devia
on of Map Op
on E is 3.25%, down from the original Map Op
on A
devia
on of 7.77%. Like Map Op
on A, Op
on E creates four majority/minority Hispanic vo
ng
districts and one majority/minority Asian vo
ng district. At the Public Hearing on January 12, 2022, the Council requested that Map E remain under consideration.
Complete demographic analysis of Map Option E may be found as an attachment to this report.
New Maps for Review
Map Option Fv2
Map Op
on Fv2 (Version 2) is a revision to the previous Map Op on F, which was a revision to the
original Map Op
on B, submiIed by a member of the public. Council was desirous of keeping the Serafina condominium complex together, and did not express a preference for either District 1 or 3, as long as the community remained in a single district. Map Op on Fv2 exhibits a devia
on of 4.95%
and creates four majority/minority Hispanic vo
ng districts and one majority/minority Asian vo
ng
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
672
district.
Complete demographic analysis of Map Option Fv2 may be found as an attachment to this report Map Option Hv2
Map Op
on Hv2 (Version 2) is a revision to the previous Map Op on H, which was submiIed by a
member of the public. Similar to Op
on F, Council expressed a desire to keep the Serafina
condominium complex together. Map Op
on Hv2 exhibits a devia
on of 5.89% and also creates four
majority/minority Hispanic voting districts and one majority/minority Asian voting districts.
Complete demographic analysis of Map Option Hv2 may be found as an attachment to this report.
Next Steps
At the conclusion of the public hearing at tonight’s mee ng, the Council may select a preferred map
and direct staff to bring back introduc
on of the Ordinance finalizing the selec
on of district
boundaries, or may request revisions to one or more maps for considera on at a future public
hearing. While the three maps presented at the hearing reflect the Council’s direc on to narrow the
selec
on, Council may consider all previously submiIed maps and adopt any map that has been previously discussed. All map op
ons are included in the demographic analysis aIached to this report, and all maps are available online for public review.
The deadline for the Council to adopt the ordinance (hold second reading) is April 17, 2022.
Environmental
No Applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Public Hearing #1 was held on September 29, 2021,
Public Hearing #2 was held on November 10, 2021,
Public Hearing #3 was held on December 8, 2021, and
Public Hearing #4 was held on January 12, 2022, and continued open to January 26, 2022.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Maps and Demographic Data
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
673
Map Option A
674
Map Option A
District
Total_Pop
ulation
Raw
Deviation
%
Deviation
CVAP19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL AIAN
CVAP19
NL ASIAN
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 14,284 304 2.17% 6,912 1,774 615 3,389 - 1,018 3,521 14 70 2 14,169 189 1.35% 6,771 1,483 842 1,975 1 2,209 4,782 23 59 3 14,495 515 3.68% 8,354 2,151 1,081 3,027 - 1,765 5,333 27 150 4 13,544 -436 -3.12% 7,870 2,109 692 3,294 17 1,415 4,554 - 31 5 13,409 -571 -4.09% 6,761 1,697 555 2,373 5 1,906 4,424 - 80 Total 69,901
Ideal 13,980
Total Deviation 7.77%
675
Map Option B
676
Map Option B
District
Total_Po
pulation
Raw
Deviatio
n
%
Deviatio
n
VAP19
Total
VAP19
NL White
VAP19
NL Black
VAP
Hispanic
VAP19
NL AIAN
VAP19
NL ASIAN
VAP19
Not
Hispanic
VAP19
NL
Hawaiian
VAP19
NL Other
1 14,093 113 0.81% 10,118 2,020 1,045 4,506 249 2,509 5,612 52 2 14,169 189 1.35% 9,884 2,011 1,159 2,757 198 2,928 7,127 77 - 3 13,968 -12 -0.09% 9,975 1,934 1,167 3,536 232 3,323 6,439 73 4 13,830 -150 -1.07% 9,956 2,199 1,115 3,487 237 3,132 6,469 62 5 13,841 -139 -1.00% 9,596 2,009 828 3,192 237 3,576 6,404 45 Total 69,901
Ideal 13,980
Total Deviation 2.42%
677
Map Option C
678
Map Option C
District
Total_Po
pulation
Raw
Deviatio
n
%
Deviatio
n
VAP19
Total
VAP19
NL White
VAP19
NL Black
VAP
Hispanic
VAP19
NL AIAN
VAP19
NL ASIAN
VAP19
Not
Hispanic
VAP19
NL
Hawaiian
VAP19
NL Other
1 14,055 99 0.71% 10,118 2,020 1,045 4,506 249 2,509 5,612 52 2 14,143 187 1.34% 9,884 2,011 1,159 2,757 198 2,928 7,127 77 - 3 13,948 -8 -0.06% 9,975 1,934 1,167 3,536 232 3,323 6,439 73 4 13,867 -89 -0.64% 9,995 2,201 1,103 3,379 246 3,292 6,616 65 5 13,768 -188 -1.35% 9,557 2,007 840 3,300 228 3,416 6,257 42 Total 69,781
Ideal 13,956
Total Deviation 2.69%
679
Map Option D
680
Map Option D
681
Map Option E
682
Map Option E
District
Total_Pop
ulation
%
Populatio
n
CVAP19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL AIAN
CVAP19
NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 14,001 0.15% 6,841 1,773 592 3,389 3,456 - 968 14 79
2 14,169 1.35% 6,771 1,483 842 1,975 4,782 1 2,209 23 59 3 14,159 1.28% 8,128 2,107 1,070 2,895 5,233 - 1,739 27 140 4 13,857 -0.88% 8,083 2,142 666 3,393 4,671 1 1,537 - 40 5 13,715 -1.90% 6,845 1,709 615 2,406 4,472 21 1,860 - 72 Total 69,901 36,668 9,214 3,785 14,058 22,614 23 8,313 64 390 Ideal 13,980
Deviation 3.25%
683
Map Option F
684
Map Option F
District
Total_Pop
ulation
%
Population
CVAP19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL AIAN
CVAP19
NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 14,093 0.81% 6,720 1,728 568 3,251 3,457 - 1,055 14 50 2 14,169 1.35% 6,771 1,483 842 1,975 4,782 1 2,209 23 59 3 14,104 0.89% 8,159 2,010 1,113 3,023 5,150 - 1,673 27 170 4 13,632 -2.49% 8,179 2,074 691 3,648 4,536 1 1,433 - 26 5 13,903 -0.55% 6,839 1,919 571 2,161 4,689 21 1,943 - 85 Total 69,901 36,668 9,214 3,785 14,058 22,614 23 8,313 64 390 Ideal 13,980
Deviation 3.84%
685
Map Option G
686
Map Option G
District Total Pop % Deviation
CVAP
Total
CVAP
White
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP
Black
CVAP
ASIAN
CVAP
AIAN
CVAP
Hawaiian
CVAP
Other
1 14093 0.81% 8563 0.2771 0.455 0.0942 0.1654 0 0.0041
2 14028 0.34% 7349 0.2281 0.2958 0.1259 0.3297 0.0082 0.0027 3 14294 2.25% 8826 0.2471 0.3695 0.1516 0.2089 0.0019 0.0028 4 13368 -4.38% 7597 0.2655 0.4331 0.101 0.1943 0.0088 0 5 14118 0.99% 7024 0.258 0.3435 0.0894 0.2966 0.0094 0
Ideal Population 13980
Deviation 6.62%
687
Map Option H
688
Map Option H
District Total Pop
%Deviati
on
Total
CVAP
CVAP
White
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP
Black
CVAP
Asian
CVAP
AIAN
CVAP
Hawaiian
CVAP
Other
1 14093 0.81% 8563 0.2771 0.455 0.0942 0.1654 0 0.0041
2 14169 1.35% 6963 0.2225 0.2993 0.1311 0.3266 0.0086 0.0029 3 13968 -0.09% 8749 0.2491 0.3688 0.1502 0.2085 0.0017 0.0029 4 14348 2.63% 8155 0.2571 0.4383 0.1024 0.1968 0.0118 0 5 13323 -4.70% 6929 0.2686 0.3252 0.086 0.3064 0.0056 0 Ideal Population 13980
Deviation 7.33%
689
Map Option Fv2
690
Map Option Fv2
Ideal Population 13,980
Total Deviation: 4.95%
District
Total
Population
%
Population
CVAP19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL AIAN
CVAP19
NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 14,115 0.96% 6,793 1,761 593 3,332 3,460 - 1,002 14 70 2 14,169 1.35% 6,771 1,483 842 1,975 4,782 1 2,209 23 59 3 13,661 -2.28% 7,884 1,947 1,080 2,863 5,026 - 1,652 27 150 4 13,632 -2.49% 8,179 2,074 691 3,648 4,536 1 1,433 - 26 5 14,324 2.46% 7,041 1,949 579 2,240 4,810 21 2,017 - 85 691
Map Option Hv2
692
Map Option Hv2
District
Total
Population
%
Population
CVAP19
Total
CVAP19
NL White
CVAP19
NL Black
CVAP
Hispanic
CVAP19
Not
Hispanic
CVAP19
NL AIAN
CVAP19
NL ASIAN
CVAP19
NL
Hawaiian
CVAP19
NL Other
1 14115 0.97% 8673 2403 820 3962 4711 0 1407 35 46
2 14169 1.35% 6963 1549 913 2084 4879 60 2274 20 153
3 13525 -3.25% 8485 2172 1285 3093 5392 15 1823 27 70
4 14348 2.63% 8155 2097 835 3379 4776 96 1605 0 143
5 13744 -1.69% 7083 1891 612 2320 4763 39 2163 0 58
Ideal 13,980
Deviation 5.89%
693
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 13.1
January 26, 2022
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and Related Letters and Reports for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021 Prepared By:
Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council accept the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and accompanying letters and reports the for fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 Summary
In order to meet guidelines set forth in the Government Accoun'ng Standards Board (GASB) statement number 34, the City enters into contracts with audi'ng firms in order to perform annual audits and compile the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). The audit process typically begins in July and concludes in December with the prepara'on of the financial statements.
The audit helps to iden'fy whether significant ma1ers exist that should be addressed by the City in order to strengthen internal controls and ensure accuracy in financial reporting.
Background
The City’s independent auditor, Teaman, Ramirez, & Smith, Inc., have completed their annual audit of the City’s general ledger for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. The services provided for this audit fulfill the first year of a three-year contract. The City’s annual financial statements were prepared by the audit firm in accordance with Generally Accepted Accoun'ng Principles (GAAP), Government Accoun'ng Standards, and comply with other rules and regula'ons applicable to government entities.
At the conclusion of the audit test work, the audit firm issues an opinion as to the fairness of presentation of the financial position of City activities. The City received an unqualified opinion from 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
694
the independent auditors. An unqualified opinion is an independent auditor’s judgement that a company or organiza'on’s financial records and statements are fairly and appropriately presented and in accordance with GAAP. In addi'on, the audit firm is required to issue reports related to internal controls and communicate with the Council regarding how the audit was planned and conducted. All reports and letters are attached.
The ACFR consists of three parts, Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MDA), the basic financial statements, and required supplementary informa'on. The MDA serves as an introduc'on to the basic financial statements. The basic financial statements include three components: the government-wide financials statements, the fund financials statements, and notes to the financial statements. The required supplementary informa'on provides addi'onal financial informa'on regarding the City not provided in the basic financial statements. The City prepares the Transmi1al Letter and Management Discussion and Analysis and the City’s audit firm prepares the basic financial statements and compiles the final ACFR document.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. Costs associated with the annual audit were included in the fiscal year 2021-22 adopted budget.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Independent Auditor's Communication to the City Council (SAS 114) A1achment 2 - Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Repor'ng and on Compliance (SAS 115)
A1achment 3 - Independent Accountant's report on Agreed Upon Procedures Applied to Appropriations Limit Worksheet
Attachment 4 - Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
695
'HFHPEHU
&LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI(DVWYDOH
(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD
:H KDYH DXGLWHGWKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV RIWKH JRYHUQPHQWDO DFWLYLWLHV HDFK PDMRU IXQG DQG DJJUHJDWH UHPDLQLQJ IXQG LQIRUPDWLRQ RI WKH &LW\ RI (DVWYDOH WKH ³&LW\´
IRU WKH \HDU HQGHG -XQH
3URIHVVLRQDO VWDQGDUGV UHTXLUH WKDW ZH SURYLGH \RX ZLWK LQIRUPDWLRQ DERXW RXU UHVSRQVLELOLWLHV XQGHU JHQHUDOO\DFFHSWHGDXGLWLQJVWDQGDUGVDQGGovernment Auditing Standards and Uniform Guidance,DVZHOODV FHUWDLQ LQIRUPDWLRQ UHODWHG WR WKH SODQQHG VFRSH DQG WLPLQJ RI RXU DXGLW :H KDYH FRPPXQLFDWHG VXFK LQIRUPDWLRQLQRXUOHWWHUWR\RXGDWHG-XO\3URIHVVLRQDOVWDQGDUGVDOVRUHTXLUHWKDWZHFRPPXQLFDWH WR\RXWKHIROORZLQJLQIRUPDWLRQUHODWHGWRRXUDXGLW 6LJQLILFDQW$XGLW0DWWHUV
Qualitative Aspects of Accounting Practices
0DQDJHPHQW LV UHVSRQVLEOH IRU WKH VHOHFWLRQ DQG XVH RI DSSURSULDWH DFFRXQWLQJ SROLFLHV 7KH VLJQLILFDQW DFFRXQWLQJSROLFLHVXVHGE\WKH&LW\DUHGHVFULEHGLQ1RWHWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWV$VGHVFULEHGLQ1RWH WR WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVWKH &LW\ FKDQJHG DFFRXQWLQJ SROLFLHV UHODWHGWR 6WDWHPHQW RI *RYHUQPHQWDO $FFRXQWLQJ6WDQGDUGV
*$6%6WDWHPHQW
1RFiduciary ActivitiesDQG1RLeases,LQWKHILVFDO \HDU :H QRWHG QR WUDQVDFWLRQV HQWHUHG LQWR E\ WKH &LW\ GXULQJ WKH \HDU IRU ZKLFK WKHUH LV D ODFN RI DXWKRULWDWLYH JXLGDQFH RU FRQVHQVXV $OO VLJQLILFDQW WUDQVDFWLRQV KDYH EHHQ UHFRJQL]HG LQ WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVLQWKHSURSHUSHULRG
$FFRXQWLQJHVWLPDWHVDUHDQLQWHJUDOSDUWRIWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVSUHSDUHGE\PDQDJHPHQWDQGDUHEDVHG RQ PDQDJHPHQW¶V NQRZOHGJH DQG H[SHULHQFH DERXW SDVW DQG FXUUHQW HYHQWV DQG DVVXPSWLRQV DERXW IXWXUH HYHQWV&HUWDLQDFFRXQWLQJHVWLPDWHVDUHSDUWLFXODUO\VHQVLWLYHEHFDXVHRIWKHLUVLJQLILFDQFHWRWKHILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVDQGEHFDXVHRIWKHSRVVLELOLW\WKDWIXWXUHHYHQWVDIIHFWLQJWKHPPD\GLIIHUVLJQLILFDQWO\IURPWKRVH H[SHFWHG7KHPRVWVHQVLWLYHHVWLPDWHVDIIHFWLQJWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZHUH
0DQDJHPHQW¶V HVWLPDWH RI WKH IDLU YDOXH RI LQYHVWPHQWV LV EDVHG RQ LQIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHG E\ ILQDQFLDOLQVWLWXWLRQV:HHYDOXDWHGWKHNH\IDFWRUVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVXVHGWRGHYHORSWKHIDLUYDOXH RILQYHVWPHQWVLQGHWHUPLQLQJWKDW IDLUYDOXHLV UHDVRQDEOHLQUHODWLRQWRWKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV WDNHQDVDZKROH
0DQDJHPHQW¶V HVWLPDWH RI FDSLWDO DVVHWV GHSUHFLDWLRQ LV EDVHG RQ KLVWRULFDO HVWLPDWHV RI HDFK FDSLWDOL]HGLWHP¶VXVHIXOOLIH7KHLQLWLDOYDOXHRIWKH&LW\¶VFRQWULEXWHGLQIUDVWUXFWXUHRUFDSLWDO DVVHWVLVEDVHGRQHVWLPDWHVRIDFTXLVLWLRQYDOXHRQWKHGDWHWKHDVVHWVZHUHFRQWULEXWHGWRWKH&LW\ :HHYDOXDWHGWKHNH\IDFWRUVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVXVHGWRGHYHORSWKHVHHVWLPDWHVWRGHWHUPLQHWKH\ DUHUHDVRQDEOHLQUHODWLRQWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWDNHQDVZKROH
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com 696
0DQDJHPHQW¶V HVWLPDWH RI WKH QHW SHQVLRQ OLDELOLW\ DQG UHODWHG SHQVLRQ GHIHUUHG RXWIORZV DQG LQIORZVRIUHVRXUFHVDUHEDVHGRQDQDFWXDULDOYDOXDWLRQDQGSHQVLRQFRQWULEXWLRQVPDGHGXULQJWKH \HDU:HHYDOXDWHGWKHNH\IDFWRUVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVXVHGWRGHYHORSWKHQHWSHQVLRQOLDELOLW\DQG UHODWHGSHQVLRQGHIHUUHGRXWIORZVDQGLQIORZVRIUHVRXUFHVLQGHWHUPLQLQJWKDWLWLVUHDVRQDEOHLQ UHODWLRQWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWDNHQDVDZKROH 0DQDJHPHQW¶V HVWLPDWHV RI WKH QHW RWKHU SRVWHPSOR\PHQW EHQHILWV 23(%
OLDELOLW\
DVVHW
DQG
UHODWHG23(%GHIHUUHGRXWIORZVDQGLQIORZVDUHEDVHGRQDFWXDULDOYDOXDWLRQ:HHYDOXDWHGWKH NH\ IDFWRUV DQG DVVXPSWLRQV XVHG WR GHYHORS WKH QHW 23(% OLDELOLW\ DVVHW
DQG UHODWHG 23(%
GHIHUUHGRXWIORZVDQGLQIORZVLQGHWHUPLQLQJWKDWWKH\DUH UHDVRQDEOHLQ UHODWLRQWRWKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVWDNHQDVDZKROH
&HUWDLQ ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQW GLVFORVXUHV DUH SDUWLFXODUO\ VHQVLWLYH EHFDXVH RI WKHLU VLJQLILFDQFH WR ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWXVHUV7KHPRVWVHQVLWLYHGLVFORVXUHVDIIHFWLQJWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZHUH
7KHGLVFORVXUHRIWKHIDLUYDOXHRILQYHVWPHQWVLQ1RWHVDQGUHSUHVHQWVDPRXQWVVXVFHSWLEOHWR PDUNHWIOXFWXDWLRQ
7KHGLVFORVXUHRIDFFXPXODWHGGHSUHFLDWLRQIRUFDSLWDODVVHWVLQ1RWHLVEDVHGRQHVWLPDWHGXVHIXO OLYHVZKLFKFRXOGGLIIHUIURPDFWXDOXVHIXOOLYHVRIHDFKFDSLWDOL]HGLWHP 7KHGLVFORVXUHRIWKHSHQVLRQSODQVQHWSHQVLRQOLDELOLW\DQGUHODWHGSHQVLRQGHIHUUHGRXWIORZVDQG LQIORZVRIUHVRXUFHVLQ1RWH
WRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVUHSUHVHQWVPDQDJHPHQW¶VHVWLPDWHVEDVHG RQ DQ DFWXDULDO YDOXDWLRQ DQG SHQVLRQ FRQWULEXWLRQVPDGH GXULQJWKH \HDU $FWXDO UHVXOWV FRXOG GLIIHUGHSHQGLQJRQWKHNH\IDFWRUVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVXVHGIRUWKHDFWXDULDOYDOXDWLRQ 7KHGLVFORVXUHRIWKHQHW23(%OLDELOLW\
DVVHW
DQGUHODWHG23(%GHIHUUHGRXWIORZVDQGLQIORZVRI
UHVRXUFHVLQ 1RWH WRWKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV UHSUHVHQWV PDQDJHPHQW¶V HVWLPDWH EDVHG RQ DQ DFWXDULDOYDOXDWLRQ$FWXDOUHVXOWVFRXOGGLIIHUGHSHQGLQJRQWKHNH\IDFWRUVDQGDVVXPSWLRQVXVHG IRUWKHDFWXDULDOYDOXDWLRQ
7KHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWGLVFORVXUHVDUHQHXWUDOFRQVLVWHQWDQGFOHDU Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit
:H HQFRXQWHUHG QR VLJQLILFDQW GLIILFXOWLHVLQ GHDOLQJ ZLWKPDQDJHPHQWLQ SHUIRUPLQJ DQG FRPSOHWLQJ RXU DXGLW
Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements
3URIHVVLRQDO VWDQGDUGV UHTXLUH XV WR DFFXPXODWH DOO NQRZQ DQG OLNHO\ PLVVWDWHPHQWV LGHQWLILHG GXULQJ WKH DXGLWRWKHUWKDQWKRVHWKDWDUHFOHDUO\WULYLDODQGFRPPXQLFDWHWKHPWRWKHDSSURSULDWHOHYHORIPDQDJHPHQW 0DQDJHPHQWKDVFRUUHFWHGDOOVXFKPLVVWDWHPHQWV,QDGGLWLRQQRQHRIWKHPLVVWDWHPHQWVGHWHFWHGDVDUHVXOW RIDXGLWSURFHGXUHVDQGFRUUHFWHGE\PDQDJHPHQWZHUHPDWHULDOHLWKHULQGLYLGXDOO\RULQWKHDJJUHJDWHWR HDFKRSLQLRQXQLW¶VILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWDNHQDVDZKROH 697
Disagreements with Management
)RUSXUSRVHVRIWKLVOHWWHUDGLVDJUHHPHQWZLWKPDQDJHPHQWLVDILQDQFLDODFFRXQWLQJUHSRUWLQJRUDXGLWLQJ PDWWHUZKHWKHURUQRWUHVROYHGWRRXUVDWLVIDFWLRQWKDWFRXOGEHVLJQLILFDQWWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVRUWKH DXGLWRUV¶UHSRUW:HDUHSOHDVHGWRUHSRUWWKDWQRVXFKGLVDJUHHPHQWVDURVHGXULQJWKHFRXUVHRIRXUDXGLW Management Representations
:H KDYH UHTXHVWHG FHUWDLQ UHSUHVHQWDWLRQV IURP PDQDJHPHQW WKDW DUH LQFOXGHG LQ WKH PDQDJHPHQW UHSUHVHQWDWLRQOHWWHUGDWHG'HFHPEHU
Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants ,Q VRPH FDVHV PDQDJHPHQW PD\ GHFLGHWR FRQVXOW ZLWK RWKHU DFFRXQWDQWV DERXW DXGLWLQJ DQG DFFRXQWLQJ PDWWHUVVLPLODUWRREWDLQLQJD³VHFRQGRSLQLRQ´RQFHUWDLQVLWXDWLRQV,IDFRQVXOWDWLRQLQYROYHVDSSOLFDWLRQ RI DQ DFFRXQWLQJ SULQFLSOH WR WKH &LW\¶V ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV RU D GHWHUPLQDWLRQ RI WKH W\SH RI DXGLWRU¶V RSLQLRQ WKDW PD\ EH H[SUHVVHG RQ WKRVH VWDWHPHQWV RXU SURIHVVLRQDO VWDQGDUGV UHTXLUH WKH FRQVXOWLQJ DFFRXQWDQWWRFKHFNZLWKXVWRGHWHUPLQHWKDWWKHFRQVXOWDQWKDVDOOWKH UHOHYDQW IDFWV7RRXUNQRZOHGJH WKHUHZHUHQRVXFKFRQVXOWDWLRQVZLWKRWKHUDFFRXQWDQWV Other Audit Findings or Issues
:H JHQHUDOO\ GLVFXVV D YDULHW\ RIPDWWHUVLQFOXGLQJWKH DSSOLFDWLRQ RI DFFRXQWLQJ SULQFLSOHV DQG DXGLWLQJ VWDQGDUGVZLWKPDQDJHPHQWHDFK\HDUSULRUWRUHWHQWLRQDVWKH&LW\¶VDXGLWRUV+RZHYHUWKHVHGLVFXVVLRQV RFFXUUHGLQWKHQRUPDOFRXUVHRIRXUSURIHVVLRQDOUHODWLRQVKLSDQGRXUUHVSRQVHVZHUHQRWDFRQGLWLRQWRRXU UHWHQWLRQ
2WKHU0DWWHUV
:H DSSOLHG FHUWDLQ OLPLWHG SURFHGXUHV WR WKH PDQDJHPHQW¶V GLVFXVVLRQ DQG DQDO\VLV DQG WKH UHTXLUHG VXSSOHPHQWDU\LQIRUPDWLRQVHFWLRQZKLFKDUHUHTXLUHGVXSSOHPHQWDU\LQIRUPDWLRQ 56,
WKDWVXSSOHPHQWVWKH
EDVLF ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV2XUSURFHGXUHVFRQVLVWHG RILQTXLULHVRIPDQDJHPHQW UHJDUGLQJWKHPHWKRGVRI SUHSDULQJWKHLQIRUPDWLRQDQGFRPSDULQJWKHLQIRUPDWLRQ IRUFRQVLVWHQF\ZLWKPDQDJHPHQW¶V UHVSRQVHVWR RXULQTXLULHVWKHEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGRWKHUNQRZOHGJHZHREWDLQHGGXULQJRXUDXGLWRIWKHEDVLF ILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWV:HGLGQRWDXGLWWKH56,DQGGRQRWH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRUSURYLGHDQ\DVVXUDQFHRQWKH 56,
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
:HZHUHQRWHQJDJHGWRUHSRUWRQWKHLQWURGXFWRU\DQGVWDWLVWLFDOVHFWLRQVZKLFKDFFRPSDQ\WKHILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVEXWDUHQRW56,6XFKLQIRUPDWLRQKDVQRWEHHQVXEMHFWHGWRWKHDXGLWLQJSURFHGXUHVDSSOLHGLQ WKHDXGLWRIWKHEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGDFFRUGLQJO\ZHGRQRWH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRUSURYLGHDQ\ DVVXUDQFHRQLW
$VSDUWRIWKHDXGLWZHDVVLVWHGZLWKWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRIWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGUHODWHGQRWHV*$6% 3HQVLRQ FDOFXODWLRQ DQG UHODWHG MRXUQDO HQWULHV DQG MRXUQDO HQWULHV UHODWHG WR *$6% 23(%
+RZHYHU WKHVH VHUYLFHV GRHV QRW FRQVWLWXWH DQ DXGLW XQGHU *RYHUQPHQW $XGLWLQJ 6WDQGDUGV DQG DUH FRQVLGHUHGQRQDXGLWVHUYLFHV0DQDJHPHQWKDV UHYLHZHGDSSURYHGDQGDFFHSWHG UHVSRQVLELOLW\ IRUWKH UHVXOWVRIWKHVHVHUYLFHV
5HVWULFWLRQRQ8VH
7KLVLQIRUPDWLRQDQGXVHLVLQWHQGHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLODQGPDQDJHPHQWRIWKH&LW\DQG LVQRWLQWHQGHGWREHDQGVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGE\DQ\RQHRWKHUWKDQWKHVHVSHFLILHGSDUWLHV 9HU\WUXO\\RXUV
699
,QGHSHQGHQW$XGLWRUV¶5HSRUWRQ,QWHUQDO&RQWURO2YHU)LQDQFLDO5HSRUWLQJDQGRQ &RPSOLDQFHDQG2WKHU0DWWHUV%DVHGRQDQ$XGLWRI)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWV 3HUIRUPHGLQ$FFRUGDQFHZLWKGovernment Auditing Standards &LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI(DVWYDOH
(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD
:H KDYH DXGLWHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH DXGLWLQJ VWDQGDUGV JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHG LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV RI $PHULFDDQGWKHVWDQGDUGVDSSOLFDEOHWRILQDQFLDODXGLWVFRQWDLQHGLQGovernment Auditing StandardsLVVXHG E\WKH&RPSWUROOHU*HQHUDORIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVRIWKHJRYHUQPHQWDODFWLYLWLHVHDFK PDMRUIXQGDQGWKHDJJUHJDWHUHPDLQLQJIXQGLQIRUPDWLRQRIWKH&LW\RI(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD WKH³&LW\´
DV
RIDQGIRUWKH\HDUHQGHG-XQHDQGWKHUHODWHGQRWHVWRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZKLFKFROOHFWLYHO\ FRPSULVHWKH&LW\¶VEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGKDYHLVVXHGRXUUHSRUWWKHUHRQGDWHG'HFHPEHU ,QWHUQDO&RQWURO2YHU)LQDQFLDO5HSRUWLQJ
,QSODQQLQJDQGSHUIRUPLQJRXUDXGLWRIWKH ILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZHFRQVLGHUHGWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURO RYHUILQDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJ
LQWHUQDOFRQWURO
DVDEDVLVIRUGHVLJQLQJDXGLWSURFHGXUHVWKDWDUHDSSURSULDWHLQWKH FLUFXPVWDQFHVIRUWKHSXUSRVHRIH[SUHVVLQJRXURSLQLRQVRQWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVEXWQRWIRUWKHSXUSRVH RIH[SUHVVLQJDQRSLQLRQRQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURO$FFRUGLQJO\ZHGRQRWH[SUHVV DQRSLQLRQRQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURO $deficiency in internal controlH[LVWVZKHQWKHGHVLJQRURSHUDWLRQRIDFRQWUROGRHVQRWDOORZPDQDJHPHQW RUHPSOR\HHVLQWKHQRUPDOFRXUVHRISHUIRUPLQJWKHLUDVVLJQHGIXQFWLRQVWRSUHYHQWRUGHWHFWDQGFRUUHFW PLVVWDWHPHQWVRQDWLPHO\EDVLV$material weaknessLVDGHILFLHQF\RUDFRPELQDWLRQRIGHILFLHQFLHVLQ LQWHUQDOFRQWUROVXFKWKDWWKHUHLVDUHDVRQDEOHSRVVLELOLW\WKDWDPDWHULDOPLVVWDWHPHQWRIWKH&LW\¶VILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWVZLOOQRWEHSUHYHQWHGRUGHWHFWHGDQGFRUUHFWHGRQDWLPHO\EDVLV$significant deficiency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
&RPSOLDQFHDQG2WKHU0DWWHUV
$VSDUWRIREWDLQLQJUHDVRQDEOHDVVXUDQFHDERXWZKHWKHUWKH&LW\¶VILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDUHIUHHRIPDWHULDO PLVVWDWHPHQWZHSHUIRUPHGWHVWVRILWVFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFHUWDLQSURYLVLRQVRIODZVUHJXODWLRQVFRQWUDFWVDQG JUDQW DJUHHPHQWV QRQFRPSOLDQFH ZLWK ZKLFK FRXOG KDYH D GLUHFW DQG PDWHULDO HIIHFW RQ WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV+RZHYHUSURYLGLQJDQRSLQLRQRQFRPSOLDQFHZLWKWKRVHSURYLVLRQVZDVQRWDQREMHFWLYHRI
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com 700
RXU DXGLW DQG DFFRUGLQJO\ ZH GR QRW H[SUHVV VXFK DQ RSLQLRQ 7KH UHVXOWV RI RXU WHVWV GLVFORVHG QR LQVWDQFHVRIQRQFRPSOLDQFHRURWKHUPDWWHUVWKDWDUHUHTXLUHGWREHUHSRUWHGXQGHUGovernment Auditing Standards.
3XUSRVHRIWKLV5HSRUW
7KHSXUSRVHRIWKLVUHSRUWLVVROHO\WRGHVFULEHWKHVFRSHRIRXUWHVWLQJRILQWHUQDOFRQWURODQGFRPSOLDQFHDQG WKHUHVXOWVRIWKDWWHVWLQJDQGQRWWRSURYLGHDQRSLQLRQRQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVVRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURORU RQFRPSOLDQFH7KLVUHSRUWLVDQLQWHJUDOSDUWRIDQDXGLWSHUIRUPHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKGovernment Auditing Standards LQFRQVLGHULQJWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURODQGFRPSOLDQFH$FFRUGLQJO\WKLVFRPPXQLFDWLRQLVQRW VXLWDEOHIRUDQ\RWKHUSXUSRVH
5LYHUVLGH&DOLIRUQLD
'HFHPEHU
701
,1'(3(1'(17$&&2817$17¶65(325721$*5(('8321352&('85(6 $33/,('72$335235,$7,216/,0,7:25.6+((76
&LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI(DVWYDOH
(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD
:HKDYHSHUIRUPHGWKHSURFHGXUHVHQXPHUDWHGEHORZZKLFKZHUHDJUHHGWRE\WKH&LW\RI(DVWYDOH WKH
³&LW\´
DQGWKH/HDJXHRI&DOLIRUQLD&LWLHV
DVSUHVHQWHGLQWKH/HDJXHSXEOLFDWLRQHQWLWOHGArticle XIIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines
RQWKH$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLWGRFXPHQWVRIWKH&LW\IRUWKH \HDU HQGHG -XQH
SUHSDUHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK 6HFWLRQ $UWLFOH ;,,,% RI WKH &DOLIRUQLD &RQVWLWXWLRQ
7KH&LW\¶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
:H REWDLQHG WKH FRPSOHWHG GRFXPHQWV UHTXLUHG E\ WKH $UWLFOH ;,,,% $SSURSULDWLRQV /LPLWDWLRQ 8QLIRUP *XLGHOLQHV DQG GHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKHOLPLW DQG DQQXDO DGMXVWPHQW IDFWRUV ZHUH DGRSWHG E\ UHVROXWLRQ RIWKH&LW\&RXQFLO:H DOVR GHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKH SRSXODWLRQ DQGLQIODWLRQ RSWLRQV ZHUH VHOHFWHGE\DUHFRUGHGYRWHRIWKH&LW\&RXQFLO
)LQGLQJ
1RH[FHSWLRQVZHUHQRWHGDVDUHVXOWRIRXUSURFHGXUHV )RUWKHDFFRPSDQ\LQJ$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLWZRUNVKHHWZHDGGHGODVW\HDU VOLPLWWRWRWDODGMXVWPHQWV
DQGDJUHHGWKHUHVXOWLQJDPRXQWWRWKLV\HDU
VOLPLW
)LQGLQJ
1RH[FHSWLRQVZHUHQRWHGDVDUHVXOWRIRXUSURFHGXUHV :H DJUHHG WKH FXUUHQW \HDU LQIRUPDWLRQ SUHVHQWHG LQ WKH DFFRPSDQ\LQJ $SSURSULDWLRQV /LPLW ZRUNVKHHWWRWKHRWKHUGRFXPHQWVUHIHUHQFHGLQDERYH )LQGLQJ
1RH[FHSWLRQVZHUHQRWHGDVDUHVXOWRIRXUSURFHGXUHV :HDJUHHGWKHSULRU\HDUDSSURSULDWLRQVOLPLWSUHVHQWHGLQWKHDFFRPSDQ\LQJ$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLW ZRUNVKHHWWRWKHSULRU\HDUDSSURSULDWLRQVOLPLWDGRSWHGE\WKH&LW\&RXQFLOGXULQJWKHSULRU\HDU )LQGLQJ
1RH[FHSWLRQVZHUHQRWHGDVDUHVXOWRIRXUSURFHGXUHV
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com 702
:H ZHUH HQJDJHG E\ WKH &LW\ RI (DVWYDOH WR SHUIRUP WKLV DJUHHGXSRQ SURFHGXUHV HQJDJHPHQW DQG FRQGXFWHGRXUHQJDJHPHQWLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDWWHVWDWLRQVWDQGDUGVHVWDEOLVKHGE\WKH$PHULFDQ,QVWLWXWHRI &HUWLILHG 3XEOLF $FFRXQWDQWV :H ZHUH QRW HQJDJHG WR DQG GLG QRW FRQGXFW DQ H[DPLQDWLRQ RU UHYLHZ HQJDJHPHQWWKHREMHFWLYHRIZKLFKZRXOGEHWKHH[SUHVVLRQRIDQRSLQLRQRUFRQFOXVLRQUHVSHFWLYHO\RQ WKH DFFRPSDQ\LQJ $SSURSULDWLRQV /LPLW ZRUNVKHHW DQG WKH &LW\¶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
7KLVUHSRUWLVLQWHQGHGVROHO\IRUWKHXVHRIWKH&LW\RI(DVWYDOHDQGVKRXOGQRWEHXVHGE\WKRVHZKRKDYH QRWDJUHHGWRWKHSURFHGXUHVDQGWDNHQUHVSRQVLELOLW\IRUWKHVXIILFLHQF\RIWKHSURFHGXUHVIRUWKHLUSXUSRVHV +RZHYHUWKLVUHSRUWLVDPDWWHURISXEOLFUHFRUGDQGLWVGLVWULEXWLRQLVQRWOLPLWHG 5LYHUVLGH&DOLIRUQLD
'HFHPEHU
703
&,7<2)($679$/(
$335235,$7,216/,0,7&20387$7,21
3HU&DSLWD3HUVRQDO,QFRPH&KDQJH
3RSXODWLRQ&KDQJH
&LW\3RSXODWLRQ*URZWK
&3,&KDQJH&RQYHUWHGWRD5DWLR
3RSXODWLRQ&KDQJH&RQYHUWHGWRD5DWLR
&DOFXODWLRQRI*URZWK)DFWRU
$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLW
$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLW
7KH $SSURSULDWLRQV /LPLWV ZDV DGMXVWHGWKURXJK D YRWH RIWKH FLWL]HQV RIWKH &LW\ RI (DVWYDOHRQ0DUFKXQGHUSURYLVLRQVRI*RY&RGH6HFWLRQDQGUDWLILHGE\5HVROXWLRQ 1R
7KH&LW\H[FHHGHGLWV$SSURSULDWLRQV/LPLWIRU)<DQGZLOOFDUU\RYHUWKHH[FHVVLQWRIXWXUH ILVFDO\HDUV
704
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL REPORT
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
CITY OF
EASTVA
C
L
ALIFO
E
RNIA
705
706
CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
For the Year Ended June 30, 2021
Prepared By:
Department of Finance and Administration
707
708
City of Eastvale
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Year Ended June 30, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
0BPAGE
I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal i - v
Government Finance Officers Association Award vi
List of Principal Officials vii
Organizational Chart viii
II. FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditors’ Report 1 - 2
Management Discussion & Analysis 3 - 17
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements
Statement of Net Position 18
Statement of Activities 19
Fund Financial Statements
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 20
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position 21
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 22
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 23 Notes to Financial Statements 24 - 60
Required Supplementary Information:
Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability - CalPERS Pension Plan 61 Schedule of Contributions - CalPERS Pension Plan 62
Schedule of Changes in Net OPEB Liability (Asset) and Related Ratios 63 - 64 Schedule of Contributions - OPEB 65
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual:
General Fund 66
Gas Tax Fund 67
American Rescue Plan Grant Fund 68
Notes to Required Supplementary Information 69
709
City of Eastvale
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Year Ended June 30, 2021
Table of Contents - Continued
PAGE
Supplementary Information:
Non-Major Governmental Funds 70 - 71
Combining Balance Sheet 72 - 75
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances 76 - 79 Non-Major Governmental Funds Comparison Schedules 80
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual:
Measure A Fund 81
AQMD Trust Fund 82
Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund 83
Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Fund 84
Benefit Assessment Fund 85
Road and Bridge Benefit District Fund 86
Community Development Block Grant Fund 87
Miscellaneous Grants Fund 88
CARES Act Grant Fund 89
Development Impact Fees Fund 90
PEG Grant Fund 91
TUMF Reimbursement Fund 92
Area Drainage Plan 93
TDA Funds 94
Capital Projects Fund 95
III. STATISTICAL SECTION
Introduction of Statistical Section
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component 96 - 97
Changes in Net Position 98 - 99
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 100 - 101
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 102 - 103 Revenue Capacity:
Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property 104 - 105 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates 106
Principal Property Tax Payers 107
Property Tax Levies and Collections 108
Debt Capacity:
Ratio of Outstanding Debt by Type 109
Ratio of General Bonded Debt 110
Direct and Overlapping Bonded Debt 111
Legal Debt Margin Information 112
Pledged Revenue Coverage 113
Demographic and Economic Statistics:
Demographic and Economic Status 114
Principal Employers 115
Governmental Activities Tax Revenues by Source 116 - 117 Taxable Sales by Category 118
710
City of Eastvale
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Year Ended June 30, 2021
Table of Contents - Continued
PAGE
Operating Information:
Full-time City Employees by Function 119
Operating Indicators by Function 120 - 121
Capital Asset Statistics by Function 122
711
This page intentionally left blank
712
INTRODUCTION
SECTION
713
714
December 17, 2021
Honorable Mayor, Council Members and Residents of the City of Eastvale, I am pleased to present the 2020‐21 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the City of Eastvale, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. State Law and the City's Municipal Code require that an annual financial report is prepared. This report fulfills that obligation. It has been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and with the financial reporting requirements prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
This report is intended to provide relevant financial information to residents of the City of Eastvale, City staff, creditors, investors, businesses, and other concerned readers. This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) and should be read in conjunction with it. The City of Eastvale's MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors in the financial section of this report. We encourage all readers to contact the Finance Department with any questions or comments regarding this report.
Purpose and Management Responsibility
This report consists of management representations concerning the finances of the City of Eastvale in its tenth year of incorporation. Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, management of the City of Eastvale continues to establish a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed both to protect the government's assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the City of Eastvale's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, therefore the City of Eastvale's comprehensive framework of internal controls is designed to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.
Audited Financial Statements
The City of Eastvale's financial statements have been audited by Teaman, Ramirez, & Smith, Inc., a firm of certified public accountants and consultants since the City’s inception in 2011. The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the City of Eastvale for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, are free of material misstatement. The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditor's report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report. GAAP requires that management provide a narrative of introductions, overview, and Clint Lorimore
Mayor
Todd Rigby
Mayor Pro Tem
Christian Dinco
Council Member
Brandon Plott
Council Member
Jocelyn Yow
Council Member
Bryan Jones
City Manager
i
715
analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A).
Profile of the Government
Eastvale is a young and dynamic community in Western Riverside County. We are the most northwest City in Riverside County and are surrounded by the Cities of Chino and Ontario in San Bernardino County on the west and north and the Riverside County Cities of Jurupa Valley, Norco and Corona on the east and south. The Federal Santa Ana River and Cucamonga Creek waterways traverse our City as does Interstate 15 and Highway 60. We are served by the Chino Airport and International Ontario Airport both within a 15‐minute drive.
We champion experiences that engage, excite, and elevate our commUNITY with our kindness, grit and solutions‐driven team to achieve courageous, creative, and collaborative results! We are a Strengths Based Leadership, Purpose & Values Driven, and People serving organization. We are always striving to Exceed Eastvale’s Expectations Every Day and desire to work with consultants that share this same goal and provide award winning services, performance and results. We also realize that some days we WIN, some days we LEARN, yet we are always GIVING and TRYING our BEST.
Eastvale, recently celebrated our 10th anniversary of incorporation as a General Law City. We were incorporated on October 1, 2010 and are the second youngest incorporated city in California. The City operates under a Council/Manager form of government and has a five‐member City Council comprised of members elected by district. Each Council Member is elected for four years with staggered terms. The Council selects one of its members in December of each year to serve as Mayor and another to serve as Mayor Pro Tem. The City Council values and encourages public participation in the governing process and our residents are engaged and proud to represent their neighborhood, culture and community.
The City of Eastvale invests in community relationships to increase collaboration and communication in a positive way and works closely with the Corona‐Norco Unified School District, the Jurupa Community Services District, the Jurupa Area Recreation & Parks District, neighboring cities, and other community stakeholders. The City of Eastvale is served by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office for law enforcement and CalFIRE/Riverside County Fire for Fire/Medical Emergency Response.
This report includes all funds of the City. It includes all governmental organizations and activities for which the City of Eastvale's City Council is financially accountable. The City provides a wide range of services including City Clerk, Communications, Planning, Building, Public Works, Engineering, Community Enhancement and Safety, and internal administrative services including Finance and Talent Attraction and Development (Human Resources/Risk Management).
Animal control, library and public safety (fire and police) services are provided to the City and its residents through contracts with the County of Riverside. Other services are provided directly through other agencies, water and sewer through the Jurupa Community Services District, parks and recreation through the Jurupa Community Services District and Jurupa Area Recreation and Parks District, and public transit through the Riverside Transit Agency. The City has franchise agreements for electricity service through Southern California Edison, natural gas through SoCalGas, refuse collection through Waste Management and Burrtec and cable service through state franchise agreements with Pacific Bell (AT&T), Time Warner and Charter Communications.
The Council is responsible for enacting ordinances, resolutions, and regulations governing the City, as well as the appointment of members of various statutory and advisory boards, in addition to the City Manager and City Attorney. As Chief Administrative Officer, the City Manager has the responsibility of administering programs in accordance with policies established by the City Council and within the guidelines of the annual budget adopted by the Council.
The Budget Process & Relevant Financial Policies
Beginning at incorporation, and continuing each year thereafter, the City embarks on budget planning process which begins in late winter / early spring with a discussion of the City Council goals and priorities and ends with the adoption of the budget prior to July 1st. In January 2021 the City Council hosted a Strategic Planning and Goal Setting Workshop and on March 24, 2021 the Council adopted the City of Eastvale Strategic Plan and Priority Goals. The adopted Strategic Plan includes seven targets: Organizational Development, Economic Development, Financial Planning, Public Safety, Infrastructure, Inclusion, and Innovation and Technology. With these seven targets driving the future of the City, “priority” goals were established in order to provide short‐ and long‐term goals for the community. Examples of goals include:
Develop and Construct Civic Center, Evaluate Parks and Recreation as a City Service, Construct Police Station and Third ii
716
Fire Station, and Create a Destination Eastvale. The fiscal year 2020‐21 budget was the second budget to be aligned with the city’s Strategic Plan goals and priorities. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City of Eastvale's financial planning and control. The development of the budget is completed as two separate projects: the development of the governmental activities operating budget, and the development of the capital improvement program (CIP) focusing on short and long‐term capital projects.
The City has a set of financial policies that it abides by and is continually enhancing and adding relevant policies as it develops its formal financial systems. Initially following incorporation, the City adopted the County's policies and codes.
As the City continues to develop and expand additional policies specific to Eastvale will continue to be created and adopted, replacing the County policies and directly addressing the City's goals, needs, and priorities. At June 30, 2021 the City had $26.3 million in committed reserves set aside for an emergency 50% general fund contingency, future City Hall, public safety contract rate stabilization, pension liability, and final Hamner Place land acquisition payment.
Local Economy
The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered from the broader perspective of the specific environment within which the City of Eastvale operates. The City of Eastvale is in its tenth year of incorporation and has a young and growing population and continues to be one of the fastest growing cities in Riverside County. The City developed in a significantly different fashion in comparison to older cities; residential was developed throughout the City before a downtown commercial center was developed. Several development projects are underway, and all will add significant commercial, residential, and retail growth. A large development opportunity should soon be underway; development of the 160‐acre Leal property at Hamner and Limonite Avenues to create our urban heartbeat, the downtown core and economic engines.
Current Year Initiatives
Early in the City’s incorporation we faced major fiscal challenges, specifically the State of California’s elimination of the City’s Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenue via SB89 in FY2011‐12. The State reinstated the VLF by the passage of SB130 in 2017 of which the City is now receiving VLF revenue and the City expects the funding to continue. As a result, management has continued to move the City forward and has begun to expand staffing levels to improve effectiveness and provide better customer service to the residents and businesses. For fiscal year 2020‐21, the City focused on adding new talent by increasing staffing levels from 30.5 full‐time equivalents (FTE) at the beginning of fiscal year 2019‐20 to 35.75 FTE for fiscal year 2020‐21. The City has continued to convert contracted services such as Building Safety, Planning, and Engineering to in‐house services.
Despite projected severe economic impacts from the COVID‐19 pandemic, sales tax continues to be the largest source of revenue for the general fund. Overall, sales tax revenues exceeded budget for the 2020‐21 fiscal year and the City completed the fiscal year with a $17.6 million surplus in the sales tax category. This is due to a local business that changed business structure; as a result, county pool sales tax revenue was reallocated to host cities. Vehicle license fee, licenses, permits and fees, and property tax round out the other top revenue generators to the general fund. A specific property tax levied for the fire services is the only source of revenue for the fire fund. The City is expected to continue positive revenue generation and will likely exceed budget projections for the fiscal year. Additional detail regarding the City’s revenues can be found in the Management Discussion and Analysis.
Economic Development has continued to make strides in the City, in 2020‐21 the City experienced a stream of new development, both in the entitlement process and construction. Commercial Retail centers such as Hamner Place, The Merge, and Goodman Commerce Center all had new businesses open during the fiscal year. The City anticipates receiving its first Transient Occupancy Tax revenue starting in 2022 in addition to the final $4.0 million Waste Hauler Retention Fee, which is earmarked for the new Police Station construction. Finally, the city anticipates beginning to utilize the $7.4 million American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund allocation in the new fiscal year.
Long‐Term Financial Planning and Initiatives
The City will continue to focus its emphasis on strategic investments and controlled and fiscally balanced growth. The City is in the process of obtaining a Long‐Range Financial Planning Model, which will be updated annually during the budget iii
717
process. This model will allow the City to forecast future revenues and expenditures 20 years into the future. Additionally, a comprehensive user fee study is underway. The City believes that with the appropriate policies in place, as approved and revisited each year as part of the budget program and Strategic Plan, the City's long‐term financial goals will be met.
The City has taken many steps to preserve the City’s financial integrity, maintain critical service levels, and sustain a reserve to grow the City into the coming years. Central to the city’s long‐term financial planning is the City’s Strategic Plan, which is annually incorporated into the budget process, culminating in an adopted budget each year by July 1st.
Long‐Term Liabilities
As of June 30, 2021, the city only has a few types of long‐term liabilities. They include employee accrued leave, capital leases (Southern California Edison Streetlight Purchase and LED Retrofit), and retirement benefits including CalPERS pension and other post‐employment benefits (OPEB). The city provides retirement pension benefits to employees through the California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS). The city pays 100% of the required employer contributions and employees are responsible for paying employee contributions. As of June 30, 2020 the city’s two plans are funded at
91.8% for classic and 89.8% for PEPRA.
The city provides postemployment health care benefits through the CalPERS healthcare program, Public Employees’ Medical and Welfare Trust Medical Plan (PEMHCA). The city has elected to join the CalPERS OPEB Trust in accordance with GASB No. 75, which provides a means to fund future retiree healthcare costs. The independently prepared actuarial valuation for the city’s OPEB determined that the trust is funded at 170.1% as of the most recent valuation dated December 31, 2019.
Additional details regarding the City’s long‐term liabilities can be found in the Management Discussion and Analysis and Note 7 of the financial statements.
Risk Management
The city retains the risk loss for general liability and workers’ compensation. General liability is housed within the city’s general fund. The city is a member of the Public Entity Risk Management Authority (PERMA) for general liability. PERMA was established to pool resources, share risks, purchases excess insurance, and share costs for professional risk management and claims administration. PERMA is a member of California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Excess Insurance Authority for excess liability coverage. Workers’ compensation is housed within the city’s general fund. The city is a member of State Compensation Insurance Fund for workers compensation. Established in 1914 by the state legislature, State Fund is a California specific provider of workers’ compensation insurance. Additionally, the city carries commercial insurance for all other risks of loss, including employee health, property, fire, water, and machinery insurance.
Awards and Acknowledgments
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United State and Canada awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Eastvale for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. This was the 9th consecutive year that the city has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement program requirements and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
Concluding Remarks
The City, in its tenth year of incorporation, has achieved a great deal in transitioning from the County support services and contract services and has established its own culture and approach to local governance. This tenth year provided the city the opportunity to continue the implementation of its longer‐term oriented policies and procedures. Building on these experiences, the forthcoming eleventh year of operation is poised to continue to refine and enhance these activities, which will provide the needed foundation for future successful operations and service delivery consistent with our Strategic Plan goals and priorities.
iv
718
In closing, I'd like to state that the preparation of this report would not have been possible without the talent and dedicated service of the Finance Department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and City Council for their support for striving for the highest standards of professionalism in the management of the City of Eastvale's finances.
Respectfully submitted,
Bryan Jones Amanda Wells
City Manager Finance Director / City Treasurer v
719
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Eastvale
California
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2020
Executive Director/CEO
vi
720
CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA
LIST OF PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS
JUNE 30, 2021
CITY COUNCIL
JOCELYN YOW
Mayor
CLINT LORIMORE
Mayor Pro Tempore
CHRISTIAN DINCO, Councilmember
BRANDON PLOTT, Councilmember
TODD RIGBY, Councilmember
CITY ADMINISTRATION
BRYAN JONES
City Manager
ERICA VEGA
City Attorney
AMANDA WELLS, Finance Director/City Treasurer
vii
721
City of Eastvale, Organization Chart Fiscal Year 2020‐21 Residents
City Council
City Manager
City
Clerk/Communications
Director
Assistant City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Communications
Specialist
Office Specialist (PT)
Finance Director/City
Treasurer
Accounting Manager
Accountant
Senior Accounting
Technician
Accounting Technician
Talent & Special
Projects Manager
Talent Analyst
Office Specialist
Community
Development Director
Community
Enhancement & Safety
Manager
CES Officer (2)
Emergency
Managerment
Specialist
Street Sweeping
Enforcement Officer
Street Sweeping
Enforcement Officer
Office Specialist
Planning Manager
Senior Planner
Assistant Planner
Planning Technician
Building Officlal
Senior Permit
Technician
Permit Technician
Permit Specialist
City Engineer
Senior Engineer
Associate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Office Specialist Senior Management Analyst
Management Analyst Executive Assistant
Fire Services Contract Law Enforcement Contract
City Attorney
viii
722
FINANCIAL
SECTION
723
724
,1'(3(1'(17$8',7256¶5(3257
&LW\&RXQFLO
&LW\RI(DVWYDOH
(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD
5HSRUWRQWKH)LQDQFLDO6WDWHPHQWV
:HKDYHDXGLWHGWKHDFFRPSDQ\LQJILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVRIWKHJRYHUQPHQWDODFWLYLWLHVHDFKPDMRUIXQGDQGDJJUHJDWHUHPDLQLQJ IXQGLQIRUPDWLRQRIWKH&LW\RI(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLD
WKH³&LW\´
DVRIDQGIRUWKH\HDUHQGHG-XQHDQGWKHUHODWHGQRWHV WRWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZKLFKFROOHFWLYHO\FRPSULVHWKH&LW\¶VEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDVOLVWHGLQWKHWDEOHRIFRQWHQWV Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements 0DQDJHPHQWLVUHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHSUHSDUDWLRQDQGIDLUSUHVHQWDWLRQRIWKHVHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDFFRXQWLQJ SULQFLSOHV JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHGLQWKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV RI $PHULFD WKLVLQFOXGHVWKH GHVLJQLPSOHPHQWDWLRQ DQGPDLQWHQDQFH RI LQWHUQDOFRQWUROUHOHYDQWWRWKHSUHSDUDWLRQDQGIDLUSUHVHQWDWLRQRIILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWKDWDUHIUHHIURPPDWHULDOPLVVWDWHPHQW ZKHWKHUGXHWRIUDXGRUHUURU
Auditor’s Responsibility
2XUUHVSRQVLELOLW\LVWRH[SUHVVRSLQLRQVRQWKHVHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVEDVHGRQRXUDXGLW:HFRQGXFWHGRXUDXGLWLQDFFRUGDQFH ZLWK DXGLWLQJ VWDQGDUGV JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHG LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV RI $PHULFD DQG WKH VWDQGDUGV DSSOLFDEOH WR ILQDQFLDO DXGLWV FRQWDLQHGLQGovernment Auditing StandardsLVVXHGE\WKH&RPSWUROOHU*HQHUDORIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV7KRVHVWDQGDUGVUHTXLUH WKDW ZH SODQ DQG SHUIRUP WKH DXGLW WR REWDLQ UHDVRQDEOH DVVXUDQFH ZKHWKHU WKH ILQDQFLDO VWDWHPHQWV DUH IUHH IURP PDWHULDO PLVVWDWHPHQW
$QDXGLWLQYROYHVSHUIRUPLQJSURFHGXUHVWRREWDLQDXGLWHYLGHQFHDERXWWKHDPRXQWVDQGGLVFORVXUHVLQWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWV 7KHSURFHGXUHVVHOHFWHGGHSHQGRQWKHDXGLWRU¶VMXGJPHQWLQFOXGLQJWKHDVVHVVPHQWRIWKHULVNVRIPDWHULDOPLVVWDWHPHQWRIWKH ILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVZKHWKHUGXHWRIUDXGRUHUURU,QPDNLQJWKRVHULVNDVVHVVPHQWVWKHDXGLWRUFRQVLGHUVLQWHUQDOFRQWUROUHOHYDQW WRWKH&LW\¶VSUHSDUDWLRQDQGIDLUSUHVHQWDWLRQRIWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVLQRUGHUWRGHVLJQDXGLWSURFHGXUHVWKDWDUHDSSURSULDWH LQ WKH FLUFXPVWDQFHV EXW QRW IRU WKH SXUSRVH RI H[SUHVVLQJ DQ RSLQLRQ RQ WKH HIIHFWLYHQHVV RI WKH &LW\¶V LQWHUQDO FRQWURO $FFRUGLQJO\ZHH[SUHVVQRVXFKRSLQLRQ$QDXGLWDOVRLQFOXGHVHYDOXDWLQJWKHDSSURSULDWHQHVVRIDFFRXQWLQJSROLFLHVXVHGDQG WKHUHDVRQDEOHQHVVRIVLJQLILFDQWDFFRXQWLQJHVWLPDWHVPDGHE\PDQDJHPHQWDVZHOODVHYDOXDWLQJWKHRYHUDOOSUHVHQWDWLRQRIWKH ILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWV
:HEHOLHYHWKDWWKHDXGLWHYLGHQFHZHKDYHREWDLQHGLVVXIILFLHQWDQGDSSURSULDWHWRSURYLGHDEDVLVIRURXUDXGLWRSLQLRQV Opinions
,QRXURSLQLRQWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVUHIHUUHGWRDERYHSUHVHQWIDLUO\LQDOOPDWHULDOUHVSHFWVWKHUHVSHFWLYHILQDQFLDOSRVLWLRQ RIWKHJRYHUQPHQWDODFWLYLWLHVHDFKPDMRUIXQGDQGDJJUHJDWHUHPDLQLQJIXQGLQIRUPDWLRQRIWKH&LW\RI(DVWYDOH&DOLIRUQLDDV RI-XQHDQGWKHUHVSHFWLYHFKDQJHVLQILQDQFLDOSRVLWLRQIRUWKH\HDUWKHQHQGHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKDFFRXQWLQJSULQFLSOHV JHQHUDOO\DFFHSWHGLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVRI$PHULFD
Emphasis of Matter
Change in Accounting Principle
$VGHVFULEHGLQ1RWHWRWKHEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWKH&LW\DGRSWHGWKHSURYLVLRQVRI*RYHUQPHQWDO$FFRXQWLQJ6WDQGDUGV %RDUG6WDWHPHQWV1RFiduciary Activities DQG1RLeases. 2XURSLQLRQLVQRWPRGLILHGZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKLVPDWWHU
Richard A. Teaman, CPA David M. Ramirez, CPA Javier H. Carrillo, CPA Bryan W͘Daugherty, CPA Joshua :͘Calhoun, CPA 4201 Brockton AveŶƵĞ Suite 100Riverside CA 92501 951.274.9500d > 951.274.7828 FAX www.trscpas.com 725
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
$FFRXQWLQJ SULQFLSOHV JHQHUDOO\ DFFHSWHG LQ WKH 8QLWHG 6WDWHV RI $PHULFD UHTXLUH WKDW WKH PDQDJHPHQW¶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¶VUHVSRQVHVWRRXULQTXLULHVWKHEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVDQGRWKHUNQRZOHGJHZHREWDLQHG GXULQJRXUDXGLWRIWKHEDVLFILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWV:HGRQRWH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRUSURYLGHDQ\DVVXUDQFHRQWKHLQIRUPDWLRQ EHFDXVHWKHOLPLWHGSURFHGXUHVGRQRWSURYLGHXVZLWKVXIILFLHQWHYLGHQFHWRH[SUHVVDQRSLQLRQRUSURYLGHDQ\DVVXUDQFH Other Information
2XUDXGLWZDVFRQGXFWHGIRUWKHSXUSRVHRIIRUPLQJRSLQLRQVRQWKHILQDQFLDOVWDWHPHQWVWKDWFROOHFWLYHO\FRPSULVHWKH&LW\¶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overnment Auditing Standards ,Q DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK Government Auditing Standards ZH KDYH DOVR LVVXHG RXU UHSRUW GDWHG 'HFHPEHU RQ RXU FRQVLGHUDWLRQRIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURORYHUILQDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDQGRQRXUWHVWVRILWVFRPSOLDQFHZLWKFHUWDLQSURYLVLRQV RIODZVUHJXODWLRQVFRQWUDFWVDQGJUDQWDJUHHPHQWVDQGRWKHUPDWWHUV7KHSXUSRVHRIWKDWUHSRUWLVWRVROHO\GHVFULEHWKH VFRSHRIRXUWHVWLQJRILQWHUQDOFRQWURORYHUILQDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDQGFRPSOLDQFHDQGWKHUHVXOWVRIWKDWWHVWLQJDQGQRWWRSURYLGH DQ RSLQLRQ RQWKHHIIHFWLYHQHVV RIWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURORYHU ILQDQFLDO UHSRUWLQJ RU RQFRPSOLDQFH7KDW UHSRUWLVDQ LQWHJUDOSDUWRIDQDXGLWSHUIRUPHGLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKGovernment Auditing StandardsLQFRQVLGHULQJWKH&LW\¶VLQWHUQDOFRQWURO RYHUILQDQFLDOUHSRUWLQJDQGFRPSOLDQFH
5LYHUVLGH&DOLIRUQLD
'HFHPEHU
726
CITY OF EASTVALE
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited)
for the Year Ended June 30, 2021
3 Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
As management of the City of Eastvale, California (City), we are pleased to offer to the readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the year ended June 30, 2021. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis is designed to focus on the current year’s activities, resulting changes, and currently known facts. As a result, we encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in the Letter of Transmittal, which can be found in the introductory section of this report, and with the City’s Basic Financial Statements, which follow this discussion.