Service
Printed Collateral - JPW will create an Eastvale Elevates pitchbook/pitch kit to be used as a leave-behind after meetings filled with visual aids when pitching to prospective developers or business owners. The kit will include branded materials that provide an overview and main attributes of Eastvale and will contain details about a specific property or entity Eastvale wants to highlight. Collateral will also include:
- How-to Guide to host a grand opening for the new business welcome box
- Key contacts list for the new business welcome box
- Eastvale shopping malls electronic and printable map
- Economic development general brochure
*Price does not include printing and production
1.00 $8,000.00
$8,000.00
Service
Project Management - As needed project management to
execute outreach initiatives in a timely and cost-effective manner.
1.00 $7,500.00
$7,500.00
Estimate Total
$55,550.00
Notes
Ongoing public outreach to support Eastvale's economic development department's strategic plan. Services will be conducted on an as- needed basis.
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A -4"
TASK ORDER #4 SEE ATTACHED
707
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[STRATEGY & MESSAGING]:
- Strategic communications plan to highlight key message points to be used in all forms of media, outreach and
communication. This will serve as a guidebook to maintain consistency and clarity.
1.00 $2,500.00
$2,500.00
Service
[SURVEY]:
- Conduct a community survey to gauge baseline knowledge of community member's understanding of the housing plan via email.
- Receive and analyze survey results; present to client; adjust strategy if needed.
-
NOTE:
Please see notes section below.
1.00 $4,445.00
$4,445.00
Service
[OWNED MEDIA]:
- Create a new web page on the planning website to
understand the housing process.
- Create icons for easy navigation to the housing simulator. - Make this web page home base for all communication-related outreach and direct all inquires to this page.
- Develop email drip campaign schedule, copy, and creative approach for August, September, October and November.
- Create messaging for the water department and garbage departments billing snipes to be sent out in September, October, and potentially November depending on the printing deployment schedule.
1.00 $7,650.00
$7,650.00
Service
[CUSTOMER CARE]:
- Develop reactive response messages for Eastvale planning staff to be used to address public inquiries and concerns. - These will be turned into FAQs that will be updated as new inquiries come in to educate and dispel false stories produced outside of Eastvale purview.
1.00 $1,150.00
$1,150.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
142
Issue Date
08/09/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale RHNA Community Engagement
Service
[COMMUNITY OUTREACH]:
- Coordinate all logistics for five (5) virtual public meetings (one in each council member's district) specific to this topic (no other topics will be addressed).
- JPW will moderate the meetings, create the presentation slide deck, create, print, and distribute all outreach collateral to promote meeting participation.
- The content created for these meetings can be used to also support Eastvale staff at all city council meetings.
1.00 $10,350.00
$10,350.00
Service
[VIDEO]:
- Develop concept, write script and storyboard one (2) two- minute video using animation to tell the housing element story. - JPW to schedule, film and produce video.
-
NOTE:
Please see notes section below.
1.00 $7,500.00
$7,500.00
Service
[GRAPHIC SUPPORT]:
- JPW will create up to 10 infographics that can be used for presentations, on the website, in email blasts, and on social media.
- Any additional graphics support not listed in other services can be captured under this service line.
1.00 $5,400.00
$5,400.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT; TRACK AND MEASURE]:
- Weekly project team meetings and other ad hoc meetings as directed by client.
- Prep weekly status reports on deliverables + monthly
analytics reporting.
1.00 $5,405.00
$5,405.00
Estimate Total
$44,400.00
Notes
This estimate includes labor for video and survey, however, to maximize support services available, the City of Eastvale can pay vendors directly for expenses listed:
- Motion graphics video estimate: $4,000
- Online survey distribution estimate: $1,100
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-5"
TASK ORDER #5 SEE ATTACHED
710
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[REDISCOVERY INTERNAL EXERCISE]
Public outreach re-discovery with the project team to
understand project goals and public participation goals.
1.00 $1,500.00
$1,500.00
Service
[STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN]:
Prepare a strategic communications plan that will outline standardized messaging, key message points, calls to action, and an outreach strategy with consistent messaging to see the highest engagement rate
1.00 $3,500.00
$3,500.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]:
Team meetings, project oversight, program work to keep
outreach on track
1.00 $3,800.00
$3,800.00
Service
[VIDEO/EDITING]:
Develop a video concept, write script and storyboard for a 90- second to 2-minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot filming and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of graphics, and voiceover
1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Estimate Total
$18,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
153
Issue Date
10/08/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-6"
TASK ORDER #6 SEE ATTACHED
712
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[REDISCOVERY INTERNAL EXERCISE]
Public outreach re-discovery with the project team to
understand project goals and public participation goals.
1.00 $1,500.00
$1,500.00
Service
[STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PLAN]:
Prepare a strategic communications plan that will outline standardized messaging, key message points, calls to action, and an outreach strategy with consistent messaging to see the highest engagement rate
1.00 $3,500.00
$3,500.00
Service
[VIDEO/EDITING]:
Develop a video concept, write script and storyboard for a 90- second to 2-minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot filming and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of graphics, and voiceover
1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]:
Team meetings, project oversight, program work to keep
outreach on track
1.00 $3,800.00
$3,800.00
Estimate Total
$18,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
153
Issue Date
10/08/2021
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT/STRATEGIC PLAN]
Execute outreach engagement plan including all touchpoints leading up to community meeting. Includes the creation of PPT presentation, meeting invite, creation of a FAQ, coordination of speakers, creation of a hybrid meeting model including, in- person meeting coordination including a run-of-show, meeting moderation, assistance with needed outreach material, website updates, and social media posts to support public meetings
1.00 $10,000.00
$10,000.00
Service
[PROJECT MANAGEMENT]
Team meetings, project oversight, program of work to keep outreach on track
1.00 $1,600.00
$1,600.00
Estimate Total
$11,600.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
178
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
Outreach
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-7"
TASK ORDER #7 SEE ATTACHED
715
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Establish video concept, write script and storyboard for a 2- minute video. Includes a full-day onsite video shoot, filming, and production; Includes editing of drone and video footage, creation of video graphics, and voiceover. (2) rounds of edits without incurring additional hourly costs.
1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Estimate Total
$9,800.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
179
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Mobility, Safety & Connectivity
PSA
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A-8"
TASK ORDER #8 SEE ATTACHED
717
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
[Graphic services for tradeshow booth]
- Creation of all graphics for modular booth
- Brochure creation
- PPT or video for booth display
1.00 $9,800.00
$9,800.00
Service
Google ad buy for restaurant and retail space including the promotion and sponsorship of blog posts
1.00 $6,000.00
$6,000.00
Product
[Project management]
- As needed project and account oversight to execute
initiatives
1.00 $3,200.00
$3,200.00
Estimate Total
$19,000.00
Notes
ESTIMATE DISCLAIMER. Any estimate provided is merely an opinion of possible costs that could be encountered, based on the knowledge and experience of the project manager. The estimate is NOT a guarantee for work to be carried out.
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
174
Issue Date
01/19/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Community Outreach Support
RJV #4832-5390-9�32 ,2
EXHIBIT "A -8 (AMMENDED)"
TASK ORDER #8 AMMENDED
SEE ATTACHED
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
EXHIBIT "A-9"
TASK ORDER #9
SEE ATTACHED
729
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Project Website
- The client will provide content to post to a project-specific page eastvaleelevates.com, including:
* On-going updates
* Workshop announcements, materials, and summaries
* Surveys
* Any reports for public review
* Placement of provided renderings and visual concepts of the future site
1.00 $5,385.00
$5,385.00
Estimate Total
$5,385.00
Notes
Assumptions
The City of Eastvale will take care of direct cost billable expenses directly through the city From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
227
Issue Date
08/22/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Support
EXHIBIT "A-10"
TASK ORDER #10
SEE ATTACHED
731
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Public/Marketing Collateral
-Graphics/print materials
- JPW will develop content,
graphics and visuals to be used in project outreach. Collateral pieces will include:
* (1) Brochure
* (1) Construction site banner design. Does not include printing.
* Sales kit including folder, one sheet, leasing option sheet, (1) battle card that talks about two or three areas that highlight the development differentiators
.
* Each collateral piece will have up to two rounds of revisions without incurring additional costs.
- Social media
- The project team will provide a fiscal year
calendar with 1-2 social media posts a week including
milestones, pop-up event announcements and workshops.
The
team will consider targeted ads on social media designed to engage the business, real estate and development of key audiences. *Does not include the cost to run targeted ads on social media
- Email template and content calendar
- The project team
will provide an email template and a fiscal year monthly blog calendar that will include (1) written blog topic per month to support the project progress. This will be used to create a buzz about the project which can be cross-promoted using other outsourcing elements such as industry-specific publications.
1.00 $24,525.00
$24,525.00
Service
Task 2 - Account Management:
* Project team meetings (monthly)
* Communications team meetings (biweekly)
* Project management
1.00 $18,460.00
$18,460.00
Estimate Total
$42,985.00
Notes
Assumptions
The City of Eastvale will take care of direct cost billable expenses directly through the city From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
224
Issue Date
08/16/2022
Subject
City of Eastvale Economic Development
Support
Staff Level Coordinator
Senior
Coordinator
Specialist /
Multimedia
Designer
Senior
Specialist
MarCom
Manager
Senior
Multimedia
Designer /
Senior
MarCom
Manager
MarCom or
Creative
Director
Senior
Director
Vice
President
Senior Vice
President
President &
Founder
Video &
Photo
Production
Partners Media buy
Rate $ 85 $ 100 $ 115 $ 130 $ 145 $ 160 $ 175 $ 190 $ 205 $ 220 $ 250 195$ ‐ $ TASKS
TASK 1. PUBLIC/MARKETING
COLLATERAL
Graphics/print materials 6 8 24 2 40 $6,130.00
Social media 26 12 16 2 56 $8,030.00
Email template and content calendar 26 22 4 4 56 $7,910.00 (1) PowerPoint template for
presentations with animations, talking
points, and custom graphics* 321 0 1 16 $2,455.00
TASK 2. ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT
SERVICES
Project
Management/Logistics/Meetings/
Agendas 48 40 32 4 124 $18,460.00
TOTALS: 292 $42,985.00
Estimate | Project Team Hours Per Task
Estimated
Hours per
Task Estimated Cost
733
JPWCOMMUNICATIONS 2710 Loker Avenue W., Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92010 jpwcomm.com | 760.683.8395
JPW Communications Rate Sheet – 2022 The following sets forth the current rate schedule for JPW Communications. All work is charged in 15-minute increments and billed at the end of each month unless otherwise arranged via a set contract. Position Rate/Hour President $250 Senior Vice President $220 Vice President $205 Senior Director $190 Director $175 Senior Manager $160 Manager $145 Senior Multimedia Designer $145 Senior Specialist $130 Specialist $115 Multimedia Designer $115 Senior Coordinator $100 Production Artist $85 Coordinator $85 Administrative Assistant $85 734
EXHIBIT "A-11"
TASK ORDER #11
SEE ATTACHED
735
Item Type
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
Service
Task 1 - Project Management -
- Host (9) monthly half-hour meetings to provide key updates and solicit client feedback. Meetings will start in October 2022 and conclude in June 2023.
- Attendance of (5) additional on-hour meetings as requested by the client.
- Contract management, logistics, agendas, and reporting.
1.00 $8,450.00
$8,450.00
Service
Task 2 - Comprehensive Website Updates -
Website Narrative Revisions
- JPW will rewrite and publish the website's content to focus on providing information that will entice companies to open in Eastvale in various segments including restaurants, retail, business services, food & drug, building & construction, and wholesale & commercial manufacturing. The content must
encourage small and corporate businesses to open a business, as opposed to highlighting industry-specific background information.
Video Update
- JPW will update the website's home page video reel up to (1 time). The video reel will not exceed 20-seconds in length and will be created with existing video/photo assets made available to JPW.
ADA Compliance
- JPW will ensure the website adheres to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 at level AA to the extent possible.
1.00 $7,015.00
$7,015.00
From JPW Communications 2710 Loker Avenue W
Suite 300
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Estimate For
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue
Suite 910
Eastvale, CA
91752
Estimate ID
234
PO Number
1094
Issue Date
09/22/2022
Subject
Eastvale Elevates Website Updates and Support
Service
Task 3 - General Website Maintenance -
Data and Document Updates
- JPW will receive new documents, data, and contents from the city on a monthly basis and shall update the website in the priority order of "critical," "important," "normal," and "minor," in accordance with Bugherd parameters.
Webpage Development
- At the request of city staff, JPW shall plan to create up to (5) additional pages on the site. The development will include (1) wireframe, (5) webpage creative layouts to fit within wireframe, and up to (2) rounds of revisions per page without incurring additional costs. If additional changes need to be made, JPW will bill at the current billable rate. Eastvale will be required to provide approved written content to support the webpage story.
- Creative development to support the (5) webpage stories including infographics, image Photoshopping, and icons. Up to (2) rounds of revisions per page without incurring additional costs. If additional changes need to be made, JPW will bill at the current billable rate.
- SEO, SEM, alt text for each page to ensure rankings on major search engines
1.00 $9,985.00
$9,985.00
Service
Billable Expenses
- Translation of one sheet into Spanish, Simplified and Traditional Chinese
1.00 $1,440.00
$1,440.00
Estimate Total
$26,890.00
JPWCOMMUNICATIONS 2710 Loker Avenue W., Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92010 jpwcomm.com | 760.683.8395
JPW Communications Rate Sheet – 2022 The following sets forth the current rate schedule for JPW Communications. All work is charged in 15-minute increments and billed at the end of each month unless otherwise arranged via a set contract. Position Rate/Hour President $250 Senior Vice President $220 Vice President $205 Senior Director $190 Director $175 Photographer $175 Videographer $175 Senior Manager $160 Manager $145 Senior Multimedia Designer $145 Senior Specialist $130 Specialist $115 Multimedia Designer $115 Senior Coordinator $100 Production Artist $85 Coordinator $85 Administrative Assistant $85 738
Project Estimator
Tasks
President Senior Vice
President Vice President Website
Programmer Senior Director Creative
Director Director Videographer Photographer Senior
Manager
Senior
Multimedia
Designer
Manager Senior
Specialist
Multimedia
Designer Specialist Senior
Coordinator
Production
Artist Coordinator Admin
Assistant Total Hours Total Dollars ($)
Rates 250$ 220$ 205$ 195$ 190$ 175$ 175$ 175$ 175$ 160$ 160$ 145$ 130$ 115$ 115$ 100$ 85$ 85$ 85$ Task 1: Project Management
Host (9) monthly half‐hour meetings from Oct. 22 ‐ June 23 5 5 5 15 2,250.00$ Attendance of (5) additional on‐hour meetings as requested by client 5 5 5 15 2,250.00$ Client contract management, logistics, agendas, and reporting 10 8 8 26 3,950.00$ $ Subtotal Task 1: Project Management ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 20 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 18 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 56 8,450.00$ Task 2: Comprehensive Website UpdatesRewrite website content for restaurants, retail, business services, food & drug, building & construction, wholesale & commercial manufacturing 8 12 3 23 3,530.00$ Update website's home page video reel (1) time throughout contract. Video will not exceed 20‐second in length. Eastvale to provide video/assets as needed 2 4 6 990.00$ Ensure website adheres to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) at level AA to the extent possible 8 3 6 17 2,495.00$ $ Subtotal Task 2: Comprehensive Website Updates ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 15 9 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 46 7,015.00$ Task 3: General Website Maintenance
Monthly data and document updates based on priority 2 15 4 8 29 4,370.00$ Up to (5) webpage or form development including wireframe and creative mockup. Client to provide approved content and images for placement. Includes up to (3) rounds of revisions before hourly rate 20 2 22 3,460.00$ Creative development for up to (5) webpages including infographics, image Photoshopping, and icons 8 8 1,280.00$ SEO, SEM, Alt text for each page to ensure rankings on major search engines 5 5 875.00$ Subtotal Task 3: General Website Maintenance ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 ‐ ‐ ‐ 43 4 10 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 64 9,985.00$ Labor Subtotal ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 37 ‐ ‐ ‐ 55 37 37 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 166 25,450.00$ Labor Contingency ‐$
Total Labor 25,450.00$
Billable Expenses
Translation of one sheet into Spanish 600.00$
Translation of one sheet into Simplified/Traditional Chinese 600.00$ Other ‐$
Subtotal Billable Expenses 1,200.00$
Markup (20%) 240.00$
Total Billable Expenses 1,440.00$
TOTAL 26,890.00$
Assumptions
739
-1-
First Amendment to Agreement
This First Amendment to Agreement (“First Amendment”) is entered into this ____ day of December 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale , a California general law city (“City”), and JPW Communications, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Contractor”), as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered in an agreement for communications and videography services on or about February 10, 2021 (“Agreement”).
B. The City Council approved the Agreement in an amount not to exceed $200,000 per fiscal year, with half allocated for communications services and half allocated for videography services. The executed Agreement unintentionally omitted “per fiscal year” .
This First Amendment corrects this typographical error. This First Amendment also removes the allocations for videography and communications services.
C. City and Contractor unintentionally executed a duplicate of the Agreement dated September 23, 2020 and desire to terminate that agreement and replace all reference s to the September 23, 2020 agreement in previously approved task orders to the Agreement dated February 10, 2021.
D. On August 25, 2021, the City Council authorized the not to exceed amount for communications services in fiscal year 2021 -22 to be increase d to $150,000, and this First Amendment memorializes that authorization.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this First Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:
1. COMPENSATION.
a. Section 4(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in each Task Order for the Services identified in t he Task Order. The total compensation for all task Orders, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) per fiscal year, unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Se ction 2 8 “Amendment” of this Agreement. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve Task Orders for Services that do not exceed the City Manager’s then -current signing authority for purchases of professional services as set forth in Section
4.06.050 of the Eastvale Municipal Code, as that section may be amended 740
-2-
from time to time. All other Task Orders shall be approved by the City Council prior to the commencement of the Services.”
b. For communications services rendered in fiscal year 2021 -22, the compensation not to exceed amount was increased to $150,000.
2. TERMINATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT. The agreement City and Contractor entered into dated September 23, 2020 is hereby terminated. All references to the agreement dated September 23, 2020 contained wit hin Task Orders approved prior to the date of this First Amendment shall be changed to refer to the Agreement dated February 10, 2021.
3. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. Remainder Unchanged . Except as specifically modified and amended in this First Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties. b. Integration. This First Amendment constitute s the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this First Amendment. c. Effective Date. This First Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Consultant.
d. Applicable Law . The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this First Amendment. e. References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this First Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this First Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CITY OF EASTVALE:
____________________________
Mark Orme, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Erica L. Vega, City Attorney
741
-3-
ATTEST:
____________________________
Marc Donohue, City Clerk
JPW COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
___________________________
Name:
Title:
742
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 10.12
December 14, 2022
Approval of a Third Contract Amendment with Gray Quarter Inc. for Software Support Services
Prepared By:
Simone Blackwell, Environmental Compliance Analyst
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1 .
Approve a third amendment to the contract with Gray Quarter Inc. for a total not-to-exceed fee amount of $124,205. The third amendment will increase the current not-to-exceed amount of $99,205 by an additional $25,000; and
2 .
Authorize the City Manager to execute the contract amendment and other necessary documents.
Summary
The Community Safety Department u1lizes Gray Quarter, Inc. to provide so2ware support and administra1on of the Accela Civic Pla4orm. Accela Civic Pla4orm provides cloud-based solu1ons and for permi5ng, project review, licensing, code enforcement, and service request management. The use of Accela Civic Pla4orm has allowed City staff to be more efficient and provide addi1onal services to the community.
To receive addi1onal so2ware support services for fiscal year 2022-23, the Community Safety Department is reques1ng a third amendment to the Gray Quarter Inc. contract for a not-to-exceed amount of $124,205. The fee includes the current not-to-exceed fee of $99,205 for services rendered during fiscal year 2021-22 and 2022-23, in addi1on to $25,000 for addi1onal services expected to be incurred during fiscal year 2022-23. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
743
Background
On January 7, 2020, the City entered into an agreement with Gray Quarter, Inc. to provide so2ware support and administra1on of Accela Civic Pla4orm for a total amount of $12,395.00 for fiscal year 2021-22. On July 27, 2022, City Council approved a first amendment to the contract increasing the not-to-exceed amount to $49,810.00 for addi1onal so2ware support services provided exclusively during fiscal year 2021-22.
On August 24, 2022, City Council approved a second amendment to the contract, increasing the contract by an addi1onal $49,395 for a total not-to-exceed amount to $99,205. The addi1onal $49,395 was designated towards so2ware support and tracking module implementa1on services provided exclusively during fiscal year 2022-23.
The third amendment will allow for addi1onal improvements to be completed for Planning and Engineering.
Through the partnership with Gray Quarter, the City has been able to transi1on to digital applica1on and plan review for all building permit types. Residents and builders can now apply online, have plans reviewed online, pay fees online, obtain a permit, and request inspec1ons all without the need to visit City Hall.
Environmental
Not applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: 7
| Goal #: 7
Amending the contract with Gray Quarter, Inc. supports the goal of inves1ng internally in so2ware and technology improvements to enhance customer service (Target 7, Goal 7).
Fiscal Impact
City Council approved funds are available in General Fund, Community Development other contract services account 100-301-6490 to accommodate $15,000 and the remaining $10,000 will be available through a mid-year budget adjustment in the General Fund Building Safety Division.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 27, 2022, City Council approved a first amendment to the contract, increasing the not-to- exceed fee to $49,810.
On August 24, 2022, City Council approved a second amendment to the contract, increasing the not- to-exceed fee to $99,205.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Accela Civic Platform Administration 01.07.2020
Attachment 2 - Signed Gray Quarter Contract No 1 Amendment - Not to Exceed Fee
Attachment 3 - Signed Gray Quarter Contract No 2 Amendment - Not to Exceed Fee
Attachment 4 - Signed Gray Quarter Contract No 3 Amendment - Not to Exceed Fee
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
744
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
Accela Civic Platform Administration]
I Services (" Agreement") Is entered Into as of this l^ dav of GrarOuaSl I*" " t"® CityofEastvale, a municipalcorporationfcity") LdGrayQuarter, Inc.. a California corporation (" Contractor"). City and Contractor are dTasTe^ P^rtiJ^^ -°" ectively
RECITALS
f ^ sought, by direct negotiation the performance of theservicesdefinedand described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement. r following submission of a proposal for the performance of the i? to Sr^ rtro^^
desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
hv th. D°^' in consideration of the mutual promises and covenantsmadebythe Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows; SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Sut^ ect to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement" of this aSrH^ oh i® ° n® C) commencing on the datefirstascribedabove. This Agreement shall renew automatically for a subsequent three ( 3) year term unless either Party provides the other party with a written notice of nonrenewal at least ninety ( 90) days before the end of the initial term.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
to perform the services set forth in Exhibit " A" " Scope of reference ^ ' Services") and made a part of this Agreementby this SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
norf^ r ^^^ 11 not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its h , Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless qprLn oTS ^ J^thorizedin advance and in writing in accordancewithSection26 Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall 1 745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
President
John Schomp
764
A-2022-07S
Second Amendment to Agreement
This Second Amendment to Agreement (" Second Amendment") is entered into this 24thday of August, 2022 by and betweenthe City of Eastvale, a Californiageneral law city ("City"), and Gray Quarter, Inc., ("Contractor"), as follows:
RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered in an agreement for Accela Software Support Services on or about January 7, 2020 for a fee not -to -exceed $ 12, 395. The not - to -exceed fee was fully expended during fiscal year 2020/21.
B. The City and Contractor amended the contract on July 27, 2022 for a fee not -to - exceed $ 49,810 to reflect the cost of services rendered during fiscal year 2021/ 22.
C. City and Contractor desire to further amend the not -to -exceed fee to reflect the cost of services expected to be incurred during fiscal year 2022/23.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this Second Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:
AMENDMENTS.
a. Compensation. Section 4 and Exhibit B of the Agreement are amended to increase the not - to - exceed compensation amount to 99, 205.
2. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this Second Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.
b. Integration. This Second Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Second Amendment.
c. Effective Date. This Second Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Consultant.
d. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Second Amendment. 4-
765
e. References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this Second Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this Second Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
F-11 = ZMVIM 97.111MOINKM
UYL,
Erica. L. Vega, City Aorney
ATTEST:
m6Ycb6n-o'hue- City Clerk
CITY OF EASTVALE:
14-11VAM-UMRM111C4dift'
2-
Gray Quarter, Inc.
John Schomp
Name:
President
Title:
766
t .
y.,
767
Third Amendment to Agreement
This Third Amendment to Agreement (:Third Amendment") is entered into this 14th day o! December,2022 by and-between tne City of Easfuale, a Califomia general law city ('City'), and Gray Quarter, lnc., ("Contractof), as follows:
RECITALS
A.
B.
C
D
City and Contractor entered in an agreement for Accela Software Support Services on or about January 7,2020 for a fee not-to-exceed $12,395. The not- to-exceed fee was fully expended during fiscal year 202A121.
The City and Contractor amended the contract on July 27,2022 for a fee not-to- exceed $49,810 to reflect the cost of services rendered during fiscal year 2A21t22.
The City and Contractor further amended the contract on August 24, 2A22 for a fee not-to-exceed $99,205 to reflect the cost of expected services during fiscal year 2022123.
City and Contractor desire to further amend the not-to-exceed fee to by an additional $25,000 to reflect the cost of additional services expected to be incurred during fiscal year 2022123.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter this Third Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:
1, AMENDMENTS.
a. Compensation. Section 4 and Exhibit B of the Agreement are amended to increase the not-to-exceed compensation amount to $124,205.
2. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this Third Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.
b. lntegration. This Third Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Third Amendment.
1 768
c. Effective Date. This Third Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Consultant.
d. Applicable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Third Amendment. e. References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All deflned terms utilized in this Third Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this Third Amendment.
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.
CIry OF EASTVALE:
Mark Orme, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Erica L. Vega, City Attorney
ATTEST
ltlarc Donohue, City Clerk
Gray Quarter, lnc
Signature
l=.-2.---
Name
C,-" b.*,&*-
1 TGT
769
-J-
770
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 10.13
December 14, 2022
2023 City Council and Commissions Meeting/Holiday Schedule Prepared By:
Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 2023 City Council and Commissions/Holiday Schedule.
Summary
This item is submi#ed for approval of the regular mee&ng schedule for the City Council, Planning Commission, Public Safety Commission, and Finance Commi#ee for calendar year 2023. Currently, the Eastvale City Council meets on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month at 6:30 p.m., the Planning Commission meets every third Wednesday of the month at 6:00 p.m., the Public Safety Commission meets every fourth Tuesday of the month at 6:00 p.m., and the Finance Commi#ee meets every third Tuesday of the month at 4:30 p.m.
Background
Due to several holidays, the following City Council and Commission mee&ngs have been adjusted and/or cancelled:
1 .
November 22, 2023 – Cancelled due to the Thanksgiving Holiday – City Council 2 .
December 26, 2022 – Cancelled due to City Hall Holiday Closure – Public Safety Commission 3 .
December 27, 2022 – Cancelled due to City Hall Holiday Closure – City Council
The City Council authorized the City Hall Holiday schedule at its January 21, 2021 mee&ng, as part of the updated Personnel Policies and Procedures.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
771
For 2019, the City Council authorized going “dark” for the month of August. The proposed 2023 mee&ng schedule con&nues with the summer recess for the Planning and Public Safety Commissions. In 2022 the City Council held one mee&ng in July and August, which allowed the Council the ability to plan for scheduled vaca&ons and resume normal mee&ngs in the month of September. The proposed 2023 mee&ng schedule includes the Finance Commi#ee going "dark" in August and December.
If needed, a special mee&ng of the City Council and Commissions may be called if an urgency item needed to be addressed.
Environmental
Not Applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2023 Meeting Schedule
Attachment 2 - 2023 City Hall Holidays
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
772
2023 MEETING SCHEDULE
CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSIONS, AND
FINANCE COMMITTEE
MEETING
DATE
MEETING TYPE TIME AGENDA
DISTRIBUTION
JANUARY
Selection of Commission Chair and Vice Chair
11 City Council 6:30 pm 01/06
17 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 01/13
18 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 01/13
24 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 01/20
25 City Council 6:30 pm 01/20
FEBRUARY
08 City Council 6:30 pm 02/03
15 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 02/10
21 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 02/17
22 City Council 6:30 pm 02/17
28 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 02/24
MARCH
08 City Council 6:30 pm 03/03
15 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 03/10
21 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 03/17
22 City Council 6:30 pm 03/17
28 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 03/24
APRIL
12 City Council 6:30 pm 04/07
18 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 04/14
19 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 04/14
25 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 04/21
26 City Council 6:30 pm 04/21
MAY
10 City Council 6:30 pm 05/05
16 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 05/12
17 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 05/12
23 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 05/19
24 City Council 6:30 pm 05/19
JUNE
14 City Council 6:30 pm 06/09
20 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 06/16
21 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 06/16
773
2023 MEETING SCHEDULE
CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSIONS, AND
FINANCE COMMITTEE
MEETING
DATE
MEETING TYPE TIME AGENDA
DISTRIBUTION
JUNE
27 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 06/23
28 City Council 6:30 pm 06/23
JULY
DARK City Council N/A N/A
18 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 07/14
19 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 07/14
25 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 07/21
26 City Council 6:30 pm 07/21
AUGUST
DARK City Council N/A N/A
DARK Finance Committee N/A N/A
DARK Planning Commission N/A N/A
DARK Public Safety Commission N/A N/A
23 City Council 6:30 pm 08/18
SEPTEMBER
13 City Council 6:30 pm 09/08
19 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 09/15
20 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 09/15
26 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 09/22
27 City Council 6:30 pm 09/22
OCTOBER
11 City Council 6:30 pm 10/06
17 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 10/13
18 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 10/13
24 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 10/20
25 City Council 6:30 pm 10/20
NOVEMBER
08 City Council 6:30 pm 11/03
15 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 11/10
21 Finance Committee 4:30 pm 11/17
DARK City Council N/A N/A
28 Public Safety Commission 6:00 pm 11/21*
774
2023 MEETING SCHEDULE
CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSIONS, AND
FINANCE COMMITTEE
DECEMBER
Election of Mayor & Mayor Pro Tem
13 City Council 6:30 pm 12/08
20 Planning Commission 6:00 pm 12/15
DARK Finance Committee N/A N/A
DARK Public Safety Commission N/A N/A
DARK City Council N/A N/A
*Regular date changed, due to holiday.
775
CITY OF EASTVALE
2023 Holiday Schedule
HOLIDAY DESIGNATED DAY OBSERVED ON
“Martin Luther King Jr. Day” January 16, 2023 January 16, 2023 “President’s Day” February 20, 2023 February 20, 2023
“Memorial Day” May 29, 2023 May 29, 2023
“Independence Day” July 4, 2023 July 4, 2023
“Labor Day” September 4, 2023 September 4, 2023
“Veteran’s Day” November 11, 2023 November 9, 2023
“Thanksgiving Day” November 23, 2023 November 22, 2023
“Day After Thanksgiving” November 24, 2023 November 23, 2023 “Christmas Eve Day” December 24, 2023 December 25, 2023 “Christmas Day” December 25, 2023 December 26, 2023
“New Year’s Day” January 1, 2024 January 1, 2024
CITY HALL CLOSED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC
December 25 – 28, 2023
Please Note: City Hall is closed every Friday. If a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, City Hall is closed the previous Thursday. If a holiday falls on a Sunday, City Hall is closed the following Monday.
776
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Item No. 10.14
December 14, 2022
Award of Contracts for Professional Services Agreements for Community Services Events
Prepared By:
Enswins Cordero
Recommended Action(s)
It is recommended that the City Council approve the agreements with T-Rev Produc ons, X-Treme
Security Services, and Traffic and Parking Control Management Services for a term of one (3) year
period with the ability to renew for two (1) one-year extensions in the amount not-to-exceed $150,000 per fiscal year per consultant, and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreements.
Summary
The Community Services Division is responsible for the planning and implementa on of all City
community events. The City needs technical services in several disciplines to advance the goals and policies of the City Council that are outlined in the City’s Strategic Plan. On-call professional services in specific disciplines will enhance the community's experience, ensure public safety, and allow staff to mobilize that exper
se on short no
ce, if necessary, under pre-nego
ated, compe
ve
procurement terms and condi
ons. Staff iden
fied several specialty areas of professional exper
se
to prepare innovative solutions to meet the goals and directions set forth in the City’s Strategic Plan.
Quota
ons of services have been con
nuously received from September 8, 2021 through November 17, 2022. The evalua
on team consis
ng of City staff reviewed the proposals based on the exper se
and experience of the contracted vendor; ability and competence of the vendor to perform the work within strict cost and budget and deadlines; familiarity and ability to abide with required Federal, State, and local standards and codes; and capacity of staff to provide necessary guidance to efficiently manage provided services. Staff recommends entering into agreements for on-call 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
777
professional services with the following professional consulting firms for each respective disciplines:
Discipline Category
Firm(s) recommended for on-call services
Professional Lighting, Audio/Video, Electrical,
Stage Services
T-Rev Productions
Event Private Security Services
X-Treme Security Services
Traffic and Parking Control Management Services
Parking Concepts, Inc.
Background
The City annually hosts several large-scale community events related to the Strategic Plan that focuses on providing cultural and diverse events to our community. All of these events require various professional services to complement the experience and exper se of City staff, partner
agencies, and dedicated volunteers.
The intent of this on-demand agreement lis
ng is to establish a qualified pool of firms to support the various projects and staffing needs necessary for the efficient, enjoyable, and safe implementa on
of diverse celebra
ons for the Eastvale community. Maintaining an ac
ve and comprehensive on-
call list will streamline the process of awarding community event work to the most suitable professional service vendors for specific events and greatly enhance public safety and the overall experience event guests.
Environmental
Approval of the agreements is not a project subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: 6
| Goal #: 1
Collaborate to provide cultural and diverse events and celebration (include food).
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact at this
me, and there is no guarantee of community event work the listed professional service vendors. Budgets for community event work will be approved through normal budget planning and approval prac
ces; in the current fiscal year adequate budget is available in the General Fund Community Services account 100-720-6415 for these agreements. The master contracts do not guarantee work to any of the professional service vendors. The master contracts are good for one (3) three-year period with the ability to renew for two (1) one-year extensions.
Work will be authorized as needed by the City subject to funding and budget availability. All individual tasks and project contracts will be nego
ated and executed in accordance with the
Purchasing Ordinance approved by the City Council on June 26, 2019.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On June 22, 2022, City Council approved and Adopted Budget Resolu on 22-XX amending the 2022-
23 Fiscal Budget by $537,960 for the con
nued development and implementa
on of community
events and celebrations.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Agreement for Services-TRev Productions.pdf 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
778
Attachment 2 - Exhibit B - TRev Productions.pdf
Attachment 3 - Agreement for Services-X-Treme Security.pdf
Attachment 4 - Exhibit B - Eastvale - Private Security Services.pdf
Attachment 5 - Agreement for Services-Parking Concepts Incorporated.pdf
Attachment 6 - Exhibit B - City of Eastvale_PRICE PROPOSAL SHEET PARKING MANAGEMENT.pdf
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
779
- 1 -
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL LIGHTING, AUDIO, STAGE, AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES
This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this 14th day of December, 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”) and T-Rev Productions, a corporation (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by informal quotes the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of a quote for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services def ined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for one (3) three-year period with the ability to renew for two (1) one-year extensions commencing on the date first ascribed above.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. (a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, t he “Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “ Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
780
- 2 -
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed one-hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) per fiscal year, unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. (b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid a ccording to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expe nses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this 781
- 3 -
Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or oth erwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors’ work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.
SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. An y and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Governm ent Code Section 8546.7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, a t the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so ; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed 782
- 4 -
upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in-interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Contractor , nor any of Contractor’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable to Contractor’s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state 783
- 5 -
and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neithe r City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereu nder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work p erformed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all ti mes avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independent ly involved in the performance of non -related 784
- 6 -
services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily pro vide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reim bursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.
Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admiss ions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Feder al or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.
785
- 7 -
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threaten ed, including attorneys ’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or sub contractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents f rom and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor.
(c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreem ent naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
(d) City’s Negligence . The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” and made a part 786
- 8 -
of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so app roved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that intere st, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledge s, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or Ci ty may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City.
Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
787
- 9 -
In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alterna tive, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termina tion of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: Mark Orme
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor: T-Rev Productions
Attn: Trevor McGaughey
5044 Bilmoor Avenue
Tarzana, CA 91356
788
- 10 -
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total c ompensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shal l be void. The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
789
- 11 -
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusivel y in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other pro ceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.
Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Mark Orme
City Manager
790
- 12 -
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
___________________________________
By: ____
Name: ___________________________
Its: ______________________________
NOTE: CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S
BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS MUST SUBMIT
DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
791
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Contractor will perform the following Services:
A. Provide professional lighting, audio, stage, and electrical services as requested for City of Eastvale community events.
B. Setup includes ambient lighting (and truss equipment) and sound for event areas and additional event amenities (Haunted House, North Pole ride, etc.)
C. Provide electrical power to all pre-designated vendor booth spaces.
II. As part of the Services, Contractor will prepare and deliver the following tangible work products to the City:
A. Entertainment stages and archways.
B. Truss lighting, portable speakers, and gobos for event amenities.
C. Electric generators and cable bridges/ramps.
D. Forklifts and scissor lifts necessary for setup.
III. Additional services to be provided:
A. Ensure all setup is completed in accordance with applicable Building and Safety codes.
B. Attend event planning and de-brief meetings as necessary. 792
B-1
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
See Attachment “Exhibit B”
793
C-1
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performanc e of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance . Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).
(2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City.
(3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement.
(4) Professional Liability . Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three (3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance . Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability. $1,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(2) Automobile. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amo unt of 794
C-2
not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
(3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
(4) Professional Liability. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B. Other Provisions . Insurance policies requir ed by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:
1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees.
(2) Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or vo lunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor’s insurance.
(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limit s of the insurer's liability.
(4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
3. Workers' Compensation Coverage . Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation 795
C-3
against City, and its respective elected and a ppointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit “C”. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.
2. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
796
City of Eastvale
Attn: Community Services
13200 Citrus Street
Eastvale, CA 92880
Regarding: Community Event Pricing
Price Rates
EQUIPMENT EVENT PRICE
Stage (24’W x 16’L ‘ 36H”) with truss structure
Stage Audio
Line Array Loudspeaker
4 Wireless Microphones
4 Stage Monitors
Sound board
XLR cables
Stage Lighting
4 LED Wash Movers
4 Mover Beams
4 LED Lekos
Stage wash
3 Par Audience blinder lights
Stage and Vendor Electrical Power
70KVA Generator
Edison cables
Generator Cable
Distros
Additional Generator for Outdoor-Street Vendors
150KVA Generator
Specialty Lighting for Event Amenities
$ 2,830.00
$ 1,858.00
$ 2,505.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 1,000.00
Varies per theme/request
LABOR EVENT PRICE
Audio A1 Show Tech
Lighting LD1 Show Tech
Audio-Video Tech
Lighting Tech
$ 750.00
$ 750.00
$ 450.00
$ 450.00
5044 Bilmoor Ave.
Tarzana, CA 91356
(818) 294-4096
[email protected] EXHIBIT B
797
- 1 -
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
EVENT PRIVATE SECURITY SERVICES
This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this 14th day of December, 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”) and X-Treme Security, a corporation (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by informal quotes the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of a quote for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and ad equacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for one (3) year period with the ability to renew for two (1) one-year extensions commencing on the date first ascribed above.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. (a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
798
- 2 -
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed one-hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) per fiscal year, unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. (b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor categ ory in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days after submitt ed to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this 799
- 3 -
Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon c ompletion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors’ work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.
SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canc eled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed 800
- 4 -
upon, such documents a nd records shall be made available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in-interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Contractor , nor any of Contractor’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all ti mes faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable to Contractor’s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state 801
- 5 -
and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neithe r City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereu nder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work p erformed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this A greement, independently involved in the performance of non -related 802
- 6 -
services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services un der this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "volun tary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.
Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admiss ions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity t o review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly l iable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.
803
- 7 -
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threaten ed, including attorneys ’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or sub contractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents f rom and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor.
(c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreem ent naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
(d) City’s Negligence . The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” and made a part 804
- 8 -
of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
Any attempted assignment shall be i neffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, h owever, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and sub contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City m ay terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City.
Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
805
- 9 -
In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative , the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: Mark Orme
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor: Xtreme Security
Attn: Ernie Paderez
337 N. Vineyard Ave., Suite 210
Ontario, CA 91764
806
- 10 -
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total c ompensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shal l be void. The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
807
- 11 -
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusivel y in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other pro ceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or wri tten, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement sha ll be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.
Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Mark Orme
City Manager
808
- 12 -
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
___________________________________
By: ____
Name: ___________________________
Its: ______________________________
NOTE: CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S
BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS MUST SUBMIT
DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
809
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Contractor will perform the following Services:
A. Provide private security services as requested for City of Eastvale community events.
B. Services to include patrols, security screenings, crowd control management, emergency response, age verifications, and community event rule enforcement.
C. Report pertinent event security information (incidents, complaints, etc.) to appropriate City staff and law enforcement personnel.
D. Provide necessary training and equipment to all security personnel assigned to community events. Personnel may be armed or unarmed, per City and local law enforcement request and approval.
II. As part of the Services, Contractor will utilize and deliver the following tangible work equipment to the City:
A. Radio communication equipment.
B. Security screening devices (metal detection stands and wands), as necessary.
C. Branded vehicles and utility carts, as necessary.
III. Additional services to be provided:
A. Attend event planning and de-brief meetings as necessary. 810
B-1
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
See Attachment “Exhibit B”
811
C-1
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the S ervices by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance . Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).
(2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City.
(3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement.
(4) Professional Liability . Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three (3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance . Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability. $1,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(2) Automobile. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amo unt of 812
C-2
not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
(3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
(4) Professional Liability. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B. Other Provisions . Insurance policies requir ed by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:
1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees.
(2) Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or vo lunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor’s insurance.
(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limit s of the insurer's liability.
(4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
3. Workers' Compensation Coverage . Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation 813
C-3
against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions o f this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit “C”. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.
2. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
814
Xtreme Security
337 N. VINEYARD SUITE 210
ONTARIO, CA 91764
(909)390-6818
[email protected]
PROPOSAL
BILL TO
CITY OF EASTVALE
Provide private security services for special events. Rates are per hour and with four (4) hour shift minimum.
Rates subject to change in accordance to wage laws and proper notification to client.
QUOTE # N/A
DATE 11/02/2022
DUE DATE N/A
TERMS Net 30
TYPE DESCRIPTION QTY RATE
Regular SECURITY GUARD 1 32.00
OT/Holidays SECURITY GUARD 1 48.00
815
- 1 -
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
EVENT PARKING AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICES
This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this 14th day of December, 2022 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Parking Concepts Incorporated, a corporation (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
A. City has sought, by informal quotes the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.
B. Contractor, following submission of a quote for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.
C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.
OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and ad equacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.
Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for one (3) three-year period with the ability to renew for two (1) one-year extensions commencing on the date first ascribed above.
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. (a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
816
- 2 -
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “B” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed one-hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) per fiscal year, unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. (b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “B” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor categ ory in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.
SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days after submitt ed to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this 817
- 3 -
Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.
If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.
All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon c ompletion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors’ work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.
SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canc eled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed 818
- 4 -
upon, such documents a nd records shall be made available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors -in-interest and authorized representatives.
SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. (b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. (c) Neither Contractor , nor any of Contractor’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor may have to any such rights.
SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.
Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all ti mes faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable to Contractor’s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state 819
- 5 -
and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neithe r City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereu nder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work p erformed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.
SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.
Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, physical handicap, medical condition or marital status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.
SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.
SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this A greement, independently involved in the performance of non -related 820
- 6 -
services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services un der this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "volun tary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.
Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admiss ions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity t o review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly l iable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.
821
- 7 -
SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threaten ed, including attorneys ’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or sub contractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents f rom and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to off icers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor.
(c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreem ent naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
(d) City’s Negligence . The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.
Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “C” “Insurance” and made a part 822
- 8 -
of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.
The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.
Any attempted assignment shall be i neffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, h owever, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.
SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and sub contractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.
SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City m ay terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City.
Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.
SECTION 21. DEFAULT.
823
- 9 -
In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative , the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.
SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.
Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.
SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.
All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
SECTION 24. NOTICES.
All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: Mark Orme
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor: Parking Concepts Incorporated
Attn: Art Ayvazian
12 Mauchly, Building I
Irvine, CA 92618
824
- 10 -
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.
Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.
SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.
This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendment s that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.
This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.
No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreemen t if the total compensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attem pted waiver shall be void. The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.
SECTION 29. WAIVER.
Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant o f this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or v iolation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.
825
- 11 -
This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and govern ed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shal l lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.
SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.
In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigat ion or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.
SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or wri tten, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.
SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.
If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement sha ll be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).
SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.
Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Mark Orme
City Manager
826
- 12 -
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
___________________________________
By: ____
Name: ___________________________
Its: ______________________________
NOTE: CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND
APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE
REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S
BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS MUST SUBMIT
DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
827
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Contractor will perform the following Services:
A. Provide parking and traffic control services as requested for City of Eastvale community events.
B. Services to include parking lot site preparation, guest vehicle check-in support, event traffic and pedestrian guidance,
C. Monitor all event vehicle entry points as designated, provide appropriate necessary information, and notify City staff of arrival of pre -designated personnel, event vendors, or guests.
D. Provide necessary training and safety equipment to all parking and traffic personnel assigned to community events.
II. As part of the Services, Contractor will utilize and deliver the following tangible work equipment to the City:
A. Traffic control equipment as requested or necessary.
B. Site preparation materials as requested or necessary.
III. Additional services to be provided:
A. Attend event planning and de-brief meetings as necessary. 828
B-1
EXHIBIT "B"
COMPENSATION
See Attachment “Exhibit B”
829
C-1
EXHIBIT "C"
INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the S ervices by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best's rating of no less than A:VII.
Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:
1. Minimum Scope of Insurance . Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001).
(2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City.
(3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement.
(4) Professional Liability . Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three (3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.
2. Minimum Limits of Insurance . Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability. $1,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
(2) Automobile. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amo unt of 830
C-2
not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
(3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence.
(4) Professional Liability. $1,000,000 per occurrence.
B. Other Provisions . Insurance policies requir ed by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:
1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.
2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages.
(1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforde d to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees.
(2) Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers , officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor’s insurance.
(3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
3. Workers' Compensation Coverage . Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation 831
C-3
against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, official s, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit “C”. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.
2. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.
3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
832
PRICE PROPOSAL SHEET – PARKING MANAGEMENT
Scope of Services: The minimum number of service hours required per event is Four (4) hours. The below rates shall include any and all operating and overhead expenses including but not limited to taxes, insurance, site evaluation/recommendations, meeting attendance, site preparation/cleanup, staffing, staff uniforms and safety equipment. Pricing does not include travel time.
POSITION Pricing (Not-to-exceed hourly rate)
On-Site Coordinator $ 45.00
Parking Director $ 37.50
Crossing Guard $ 37.50
Cashier $ 37.50
Sincerely,
12 Mauchly, Building I
Irvine, CA 92618
Art Ayvazian
General Manager
O : 714.5437525
M : 949.572.1963
E: [email protected]
www.parkingconceptsinc.com
833
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 12.1
December 14, 2022
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:
Jimmy Chung, City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce, read by tle and waive further reading of an Ordinance amending
Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets.
Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:
- Segment 14: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 to establish the speed limit for a new segment.
- Segment 16: Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable.
Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the acons of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
834
the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than arbitrary methods.
Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of idenfying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Secon 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
Since the City Council approved the Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, four subsequent amendments were approved. The Engineering Division determined that it is necessary to study thirty-seven (37) street segments. In accordance with State law, the Engineering and Traffic Survey involves three major elements of data collecon and analysis: (1) spot speed radar survey; (2) collision rate analysis; and (3) roadway segment field review to idenfy any roadway characteriscs not readily apparent to motorists. The recommended speed limits are based on these three elements. The study and recommended speed limits have also been reviewed and approved by the Riverside Sherriff's Office who provides contract safety services to Eastvale.
Two street segments within the City’s arterial and collector street network were surveyed. The California Vehicle Code requires speed limits to be set near the 85 th
percenle speed for arterial and
collector streets. Based on the Engineering and Traffic Survey results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these two (2) segments is shown below:
Segment No.
Location
Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit (mph)
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Ave and I-
15 Fwy
None
50 16
Citrus St
Harrison Ave and
Scholar Way
45 40
Citrus Street between Harrison and Sumner previously had a wide travel lane and a connuous issue with speeding. In an effort to migate the concern with speeding on Citrus St, an addional travel lane was added on both sides (total 4 lanes) of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Sumner Ave. In addion, a bike lane was added on both sides of Citrus St between Harrison Ave and Scholar Ave as part of the recent Annual Overlay Project. The CA MUTCD requires secons of the same street with different characteriscs, including number of lanes, adjacent land use, etc. to be studied separately.
The traffic data collected for Citrus Street in 2021 represented the enre segment: from Harrison Avenue to Hamner Avenue. It will sll represent the remaining secon from Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue.
Cantu-Galleano Rd is a short segment that connects City of Ontario and City of Jurupa Valley. It was never surveyed to establish the speed limit.
The current speed limits in the adjacent cies are 55
mph in Ontario and 45 mph in Jurupa Valley.
In order for the courts to uphold speeding ckets issued by law enforcement, each cket must be able to withstand the scruny of the courts. This Engineering and Traffic Survey contains documents 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
835
with sufficient informaon in compliance with State law to jusfy the posted speed limit. Once the ordinance is adopted, the corresponding changes to the posted speed limits on the affected streets will be modified.
Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addional speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esmated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale 2022 Speed Zone Survey Amendment
Attachment 2 - Proposed Ordinance
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
836
2022
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
Adopted on October XX, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-XX
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 2022-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 18-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 2015-14
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10
Approved By:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650
Date
* Contract services provided by Interwest Consulting Group 837
838
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3
3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 11
4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12
4.1 Speed Limit Signing 13
5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14
5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance 14
APPENDIX
APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Sheets
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
839
840
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for two (2) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.
The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe an d reasonable, therefore, speed limit s are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.
The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.
It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.
This report contains sufficient information to docum ent that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Sect ion 627 have been satisfied and th at other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria. California Asse mbly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC S ection 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, but they do not take effect until the next revision of the CA MUTCD is approved.
On July 10, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 and January 26, 2022. Since the January 26, 2022 approval of the speed surveys, the following two (2) street segments have been studied:
14. Cantu-Galleano between Hamner Avenue and Interstate 15 (new segment)
16. Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 841
Introduction
2 The segments below were studied for the following reasons:
1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 14
2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable:
Citrus Street – Segment 161
This survey will either verify, increase, or decrea se the existing speed limits for the two (2) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.
At two (2) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD 2014 (rev 6).
Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc.
Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E.
1 In 2022, a City project restriped the section of Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue from 2 to 4 lanes (to match Sumner Avenue to Scholar Way) with bike lanes. Citrus Street between Sumner Ave and Scholar Way was also restriped, to add bike lanes. The result was consistent stripi ng between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The restriping changed the character of the roadway between Harrison Aven ue and Scholar Way, requiring a resurvey for continued enforcement. Citrus Street previously varied along its length from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. With the new striping, a mile-long section of the street now has consistent striping , which is significantly different from the striping between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. The City decided to split Citrus Street into two segments, between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way and between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue. New speed survey data and traffic count data were collected for the modified segment between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way. The traffic data collected in the 2021 Engineerin g and Traffic Survey are still applicable to the segment between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue since there have not been any striping changes to that segment. The traffic collision data for Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue, however, has been modified to reflect the shorter segment, with no change in the findings.
842
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0
STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, th e normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
The study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 a nd as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 6. The thr ee elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:
1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2. Collision records
3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver
Other factors that may also be considered include:
Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed su rveys, performed by a certifie d radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for two (2) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.
843
Study Methodology
4 Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the two (2) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the Statew ide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period from August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022 (three years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.
Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased co nsideration of vulnerable pedest rian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.
Analysis. The three elements and two other factor s described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:
Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow th e speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.
Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.
The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:
A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditi ons are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.
C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no furt her reduction can be applied.
A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Collision Data on California State Highways (roads miles, travel, collisions) published by Caltrans every two years. The latest edition, 2019, was used for this 2022 analysis.
The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:
Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years 844
Study Methodology
5 Where: Number of mid-block collis ions based on 3 years (August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2022), 24- hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.
California Assembly Bill (AB) 43 modified certain sections of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which also pertain to certain sections of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Some of the modified sections of the CVC became effective on January 1, 2022, whereas other changes related to the CA MUTC D do not go into effect until the CA MUTCD is updated. Neither of the two study segments were affected by AB 43. Details of the changes related to AB 43 are provided in Appendix A.
845
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0
SURVEY RESULTS
3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey
Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.
The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.
Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Su rvey Summary sheets for each of the two (2) segments surveyed as well as those for segmen ts previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
Posted speed limit
Direction of survey
Date and time of speed survey
Weather conditions
Number of vehicles observed in each direction
Speed of each surveyed vehicle
15th percentile speed
50th Percentile speed
85th Percentile speed
10 mph pace speed
Percent over pace speed
Percent in pace speed
Percent under pace speed
Average speed
The summary contains information about vehicu lar speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 846
7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1
(May 2022)
No
Street
Between
Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street
N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 40 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usa
ge, no bike lanes
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I- 15)
E/W None 2 59 55 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 (Continued on Next Page)
847
8 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary 1 (Continued)
No
Street
Between
Dir
Existing
Speed Limit2
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
38 Riverside Drive Hamne r Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduce - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 39 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increase - 85th%ile, Option 2 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None2 43 40 Establishing Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray.
2,One segment, currently studied (No. 14), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 3 See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA law, AB 43. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for expl anations of Option 1 and Option 2. 848
9 Survey Results
3.2 Collision Rate Analysis
The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segm ent was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collisio n data for the two (2) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from August 1, 2019 to July 31, 2022. Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were cal culated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”
It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.
The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.
Example:
Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 10
6 Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data
Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue betwee n Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue:
Collision Rate = 10 x 10
6 18,890 x 365 x 1.00 x 3
= 0.48 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)
The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2019 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the two (2) segments stud ied in the 2022 analysis, and are as follows:
No.
Street
Between
Statewide
Average
Collision
Rate
14 Cantu-Galleano I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave 1.18
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 1.14
849
10 Table 2: Collision Analysis 1
(Amended September 2022)
No
Street
Between
Segment Length
(mile)
Segment Length
(feet)
Average Daily
Traffic (ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
(3 yr total)
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM)3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 3
4 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 5,400 1 0.25 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3755 1 0.24 0.93 No Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 8
9 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20934 7 0.19 1.29 No Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 20 21
22 23
24 25
Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 19,500 5 0.42 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 1.34 7,080 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 29
30 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No 31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 33 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7806 4 0.62 1.32 No 37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 39 40
41 42
Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 43 44
45 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 5,600 4 1.55 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4721 0 0.00 0.91 No Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6678 1 0.20 1.60 No 46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 New roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 3-year period 3 Col/MVM = Collisions (Accidents) per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 850
11 Survey Results
3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.
The roadway segments were driven by Ms. Angelina Miralaie, Traffic Engineer (contracted through Interwest). The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were recorded as part of the study in Strip Maps Found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the reco mmended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.
The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
Collision History
Collision Rate
Average Daily Traffic Volume
Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations Lack of Sidewalks and Bike Lanes
Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways Nearby schools and parks
Adjacent land uses
851
Survey Findings and Recommendations
12 SECTION 4.0
SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.
The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.
Most recent collision record (mid-block)
Roadway characteristics
Shoulder condition
Grade
Alignment
Sight Distance
Roadside development and environment
Parking practices and pedestrian activity
Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Residential density
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engin eering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows th e surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 852
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 4.1 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.
It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.
Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.
Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.
853
Summary and Conclusions
14 SECTION 5.0
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 6, Section 2B.13.
2. Daily traffic counts for two (2) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2022 on May 18th.
3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.
4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.
5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on the two (2) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should both be changed, as listed below.
Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit
No.
Street
Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd
Hamner Avenue and I-15
Freeway None 50 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar
Way 45 MPH 40 MPH Decrease Speed Limit
– 85th percentile,
Option 1
5.1 Speed Limit Ordinance
Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as follows:
854
ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX (DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED
LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and road side conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No
Street
Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 DRAFT
855
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 55
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
28 29
Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 39
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40
DRAFT
856
(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above-listed streets are set forth herein.
Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.
The following speed limits are as established:
No.
Street
Between
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 40
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45 Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
28 29
Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
DRAFT
857
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35
Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this _____ day of October, 2022.
_______________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
DRAFT
858
____________________________ _____________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donahue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the ____ day of October, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the ___ day of October, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: XX
NOES: XX
ABSENT: XX
ABSTAIN: XX
_____________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
DRAFT
859
860
ORDINANCE NO. 22-01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE
10 TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED
LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of TitlelO to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated January 2022)
889
890
1 Appendix A
RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an Engineer ing and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehi cle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic co llisions recorded during the specific three-year interval of August 1, 2 019 through July 31, 2022, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.
In order to enforce speed limits by radar or ot her electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineer ing and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the da te of the alleged violation…” c onstitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:
If officers have completed specialized tr aining courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.
If after seven years, “ …a registered engine er evaluates the secti on of the highway and determines that no significant changes in ro adway or traffic condi tions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.
Since speed traps are illegal, th e lack of an adequate study effe ctively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 891
2 Appendix A
REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS
Under California law, the max imum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.
Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph ma y be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such survey s include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those dr ivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.
The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also proh ibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar enforcement.
APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whicheve r is found most appropria te to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic a nd is reasonable and safe. The d eclared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.
The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 892
3 Appendix A
40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that phy sical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.
Maintaining Existing Speed Limit
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the lo cal authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.
Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit
22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles pe r hour prima facie speed li mit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity di strict” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or ne ighborhood downtowns, urba n villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail 893
4 Appendix A
or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open dir ectly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.
Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by A ssembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022. Section 22358.7, which is referenced, will not go into effect until 2024, and is, therefore, not included in this document as an applicable CVC section.
Speed Trap
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1 ) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged viola tion, and enforcement of the spee d limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the sp eed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street , road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one th at is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are a pproved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by th e Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning, and became effective on January 1, 2022.):
(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterru pted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
894
5 Appendix A
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, whil e children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or duri ng the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing an y schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physic al barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by seni or citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business ac tivity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit ahs been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2 ) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successf ully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an addi tional training c ourse of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer es tablished that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alle ged violation unless the cita tion was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to di stance and with boundaries 895
6 Appendix A
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or st ate highway with a pr ima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prio r to the date of th e alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone or business activity district. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or othe r electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the a lleged violation or evidence th at the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or te stimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and tr affic survey” as used in this Co de, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with me thods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other re quirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following 896
7 Appendix A
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. 2) Collision records.
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic su rvey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occ upied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectivel y, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one- quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, senior s, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupi ed by buildings in use for busine ss, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district ma y be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of bu ildings in use for busine ss to the length of the highway exists.
Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, w ithin a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting th ereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or busine ss structures, or (b) upon bot h sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business st ructures. A residence 897
8 Appendix A
district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.
Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a high way is within a business or re sidence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a) No building shall be counted unless its entr ance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehi cle upon a highway at a speed gr eater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibili ty, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
898
9 Appendix A
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highw ays if during the last 100 feet of his approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffi c upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all such highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right- of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
1) On any highway other than a state highwa y, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When passing a school building or the gr ounds thereof, conti guous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during sc hool hours or during the noon recess period.
Such prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
3) When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street othe r than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.
Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having juri sdiction of the portions of the street concerned 899
10 Appendix A
have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways w ith two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different ro adways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
Speed Trap Prohibition
40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a sp eed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
900
APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated June 2021)
901
902
1 Appendix B
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated June 2021)
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.
The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see
Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 903
2 Appendix B
mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.
Option:
1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f).
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f). 904
3 Appendix B
Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Standard:
905
4 Appendix B
24 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
25 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 26 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.
If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
27 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
28 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. 906
5 Appendix B
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.
B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
29 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
30 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.
Guidance:
31 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report. 32 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
907
6 Appendix B
Support:
33 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
34 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.
Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 35 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.
Option:
36 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
37 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
38 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 39 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
40 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
41 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.
Option:
42 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 43 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
44 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
45 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
908
Standard:
7 Appendix B
46 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
47 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 48 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
49 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.
Standard:
50 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
51 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
Standard:
52 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
53 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 54 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
55 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
909
Standard:
8 Appendix B
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
Option:
56 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
57 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs gi ving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
Guidance:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.
Standard:
59 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
60 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
61 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
64 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
65 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
66 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.
Option:
67 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar. 910
9 Appendix B
Guidance:
68 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
69 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
70 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
72 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
73 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
Guidance:
74 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
75 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
76 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 77 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Support:
78 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
79 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
80 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
81 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
82 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.
911
10 Appendix B
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
83 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
84 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
85 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
Standard:
86 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
87 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.
Standard:
88 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
90 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
• The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
• Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
• Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
• A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law. 912
11 Appendix B
Speed Traps
Support:
92 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
93 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 94 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 95 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
97 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
98 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.
Support:
99 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Standard:
100 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.
An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
101 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
102 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
913
12 Appendix B
Support:
103 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.
Standard:
104 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
105 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part
6. Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
106 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.
Support:
107 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
914
13 Appendix B
Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD
Text Headings
Standard—a statement of required, m andatory, or specific ally prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.
Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineerin g judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are la beled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.
Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.
Option—a statement of practice t hat is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.
The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.
Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, pr ohibition, or enforceable condit ion. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.
Words and Phrases
Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed —the summation of t he instantaneous or spot-m easured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed —a speed at which a typical vehicl e or the overall traffic operates.
Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range repr esenting the speeds of th e largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
915
14 Appendix B
Speed Limit —the maximum (or minimum) speed applic able to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.
Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Speed Zone—a section of highwa y with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.
Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with spec ified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) —the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.
Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been desi gnated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.
Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronti ng thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 per cent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.
CVC – California Vehicle Code.
Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refe r to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.
Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.
Engineer – a person registered under Cali fornia Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to Calif ornia Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.
Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of availa ble pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the pur pose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 916
15 Appendix B
exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervi sion of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.
Engineering Study —the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engin eering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in th is Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon t he applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an e ngineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.
Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excl udes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges , and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.
Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same dire ction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.
Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skate s, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electr ic personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).
Pedestrian Facilities —a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.
Roadway—that portion of a highway im proved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bi cycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.
Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared- use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelcha irs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized user s. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
917
16 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highwa y contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.
Sidewalk—that portion of a str eet between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.
Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other dev ice used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a stree t, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or , in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public tr avel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
918
APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated September 2022)
919
920
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recomm
ended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30 , 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586
0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Commen
ts:
Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
921
922
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
923
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642
0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 m
ph due to ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comment
s:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
924
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segm ent No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (m
iles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recomm
ended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260
1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer• :
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
925
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Lim it Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (m
iles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recomm
ended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.
Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Sm
ith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
926
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: N
orth/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (m
iles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recomm
ended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:
Commen
ts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700
1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
927
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (m
iles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580
1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
928
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisma n Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segm
ent (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010
1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
929
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Term inus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segm
ent (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from
40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030
0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Cul-de-sac near River Road.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comme
nts:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
930
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Ham ner Avenue Segment No.: 11 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segm
ent (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650
1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.
Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comme
nts:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
931
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segm
ent (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575
0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comme
nts:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
932
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (m
iles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recom
mended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Vertical Curve at I-15.
Comme
nts:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
933
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
1.18 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323
0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
934
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075
1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
935
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
1.14 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.
Comments:
Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:
Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.
936
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
1.39 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626
0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
937
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curves.
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
938
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600
0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�.'-vk Vl-1 Qn-:: 7 /Jo/Zo,ei t I ,_ �11. •' Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date �,,,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 0, � Segment #19 939
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295
0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway Geometrics:
Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
940
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
941
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800
0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway width reductions.
Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
942
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:
Direction of Travel:
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
North/South
Traffic Data
19,500
4,400
0.83 Lane Configuration: 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.42
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Retail, commercial, big box and undeveloped Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: Existing
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
'::h:: l/1'1 �
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650
7 / ls2. l Zac..er'
Date
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group r� � �;,- 1T� �
I �,. I ,_ � I
�Fil Segment #23
943
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment.
Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;!
J} Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 944
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�Wlµt- 1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#25 945
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266
1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
946
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Blossom Way
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5
mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080
1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
947
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100
0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
948
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120
1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
949
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
0.91 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070
0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
950
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:
Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.
Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
C
;i,-
1Y
H!lt:t s
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. 7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (, • Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment#31 951
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:
Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
6'�) � VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I I ll:IO �)!,
1. #
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#32 952
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.
Roadway Geometrics:
Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.
Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620
0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
953
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 34
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
954
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380
0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
955
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Lim
it:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Lim
it Change:
Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970
0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.
Agricultural land west of Hall.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
956
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500
0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
957
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:
Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.
Comments:
Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.
Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� '--t,,t,_ 11--- j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1I. ;;
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#38 958
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300
1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
959
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238
0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
960
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 41
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:
Comment
s:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650
0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
961
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040
0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
962
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Scholar Way Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 5,600
Length of Segment (feet): 3,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.63
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 39 mph
10 mph Pace: 29-38 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 4
Collision Rate (Collisions/MVM): 1.55
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes except for partial Class ll NB.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight alignment. Southerly part of segment uses delineators to control U-turns and ped Xings.
Comments:
High school, intermediate school, elementary school & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.
Adjacent Land Use: Residential & schools
Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
0 �� �
'-/;k � 4:1:::: 7££f2. L201t:1. ;I
,i:. • Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group � Segment#43 963
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
0.91 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250
0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
964
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate:
1.60 Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700
0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A
0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.
Roadway Geometrics:
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
965
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935
1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.
Roadway Geometrics:
Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
966
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422
1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.
Roadway Geometrics:
Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
967
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:
Length of Segment (feet):
Length of Segment (miles):
Lane Configuration:
Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:
Posted Speed Limit:
Date Range:
Total Collisions:
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):
Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:
Recommended Speed:
Speed Limit Change:
Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542
0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
No bike lanes.
Roadway Geometrics:
Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.
Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
968
969
APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated September 2022)
970
971
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE
0.49 mi
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET
UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North
SCHOLAR WAY
JAMESTOWN AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
• 35 MPH
972
973
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)
0.31 mi
RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
35 MPH •
HAMNER AVENUE
WELLS SPRING ST
• 35 MPH
974
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North
SUMNER AVENUE
SCHOLAR WAY
HAMNER AVENUE
68TH STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
975
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET
0.5 mi
RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
WELLS SPRING ST
I-15 INTERSTATE HWY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •
WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)
HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
976
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET
1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
RIVER STREET
ARCHIBALD
AVENUE
WIND RIVER RD
BARONROAD
BLUFF
GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
977
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD
WIND
RIVER RD
GRAPEWIN
STREET
CHANDLER STREET
FIELDMASTER
STREET
SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK
EASTVALEPKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
978
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
INDUSTRIAL
ARCHI BALD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET
LIMONITE AVENUE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
50 MPH •
50 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
979
980
981
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT
0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •
BELLEGRAVE AVENUECITY LIMIT
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
INTERSTATE HWY
CITY LIMIT
982
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
BLOSSOM WAY
HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.5 mi
BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North
HARRISON AVENUE
SUMNER AVENUE
CEDAR CREEK ROAD
30 MPH •
• 30 MPH
REDSIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
30 MPH •
PINE GROVE PL
983
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALENorth
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY.50 mi CANTU-GALLEANORANCHRD.
COMMERCIALLIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< LIMIT(I-15)HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHTINDUSTRIALGOODMAN RD.&IT< LIMIT
LIGHTINDUSTRIAL
&IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH
984
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North
HELLMAN AVENUE
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE
1.53 mi
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
SELBY AVENUE
SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
985
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALENorth
HARRISON AVENUE
SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREETHARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY0
PL
SCHOLAR WAY• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPHRESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALHIGH SCHOOLPARK
• 40 MPH
COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE
COBBLE CREEK DRIVERESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
986
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North
HAMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL
ವ MP+
SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
ವ MP+
HIGH SCHOOL
RESIDENTIAL
PARK
CARROLLTON PLACE
MAYFIELD STREET
987
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
NOT TO SCALE North
FIELDMASTER STREET
HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi
RESIDENTIAL
FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
EK
RD
C
H
E
R
R
Y
MEADOW
BROOK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK
HALL RD
ARCHIBALD AVE
988
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi
CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITS
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
FAIR GROUNDS
RESIDENTIALPARK
989
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVERBOAT ROAD
HAMNER AVENUE
HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
990
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER
HAMNER AVENUE
0.91 mi
LIMONITE AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH
SWAN LAKE
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
991
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
CHANDLER STREET
North
HARRISON AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH
NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
992
993
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD TO
0.97 mi
CONSERVATION
AREA
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD
CHANDLER STREET
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1)50 MPH •
UNDEVELOPED
UNDEVELOPED
CHANDLER STREET
994
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
HELLMAN AVENUE
NOT TO SCALE
CITY LIMITHELLMAN AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
UNDEVELOPED
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
50 MPH •
SCHOOL
WALTERS STREET
ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKET
STREET
PINE AVENUE
PRAIRIE SMOKE
ROAD
LANDERWOOD DRIVE
BICKMORE AVENUE
1.54 mi
CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE
LIMONITE AVE
PARK
INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL
KIMBALL AVENUE
CHINO CORONA ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
995
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
NOT TO SCALE
HELLMAN AVENUE
LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT
0.20 mi
HELLMAN AVENUE
CHANDLER STREET
INDUSTRIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LIMONITE AVE
INDUSTRIAL
SUMMIT DR
INDUSTRIAL
HELLMAN AVENU
CITY LIMIT
ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)
1.54 mi
KIMBALL AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
INDUSTRIAL
996
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD
MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS(I-15)
COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL
60 MPH •
997
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
ORANGE STREET
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL
ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •
SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH
SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE
RESIDENTIAL
998
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD
0.26 mi
NOT TO SCALE
RESIDENTIAL
PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
999
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
RIVER ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
0.75 mi
NOT TO SCALE
ARCHIBALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE
RIVER ROAD
HALL ROAD
AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
1000
1001
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
HELLMAN AVENUE
ARCHI BALD AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •
COMMERCIAL
1002
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ARCHIBALD
SUMNER
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
HARRISON
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUE
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
1003
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY
0.5 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED45 MPH •
1004
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE
0.58 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHLEISMAN
HAMMNER
SCHOLAR
RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
1005
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
SCHOLAR WAY
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE
0.99 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SCHOLAR
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
LIMONITE AVE
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)WAY
RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
1006
1007
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET
1.12 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
1008
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
1.03 mi
NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE45 MPH •
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
LIMONITE AVENUE
RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
ORCHARD
PARK
SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH
BELLEGRAVE AVENUE
CITY LIMIT
1009
CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works
STRIP MAP
Street Name:
Street Segment:
Segment Length (MI):
North
WHITEWELL ROAD
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD
0.29 mi
NOT TO SCALE
WHITEWELL
SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH
PRAIRIE
SMOKE RD
1010
1011
APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated September 2022)
1012
1013
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:05
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
1014
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
1015
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
1016
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *
45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
1017
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C
42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/11/21
1018
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:00
62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:25
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH 56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A
52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79% 47 2 2 47 X X X X 4
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH
43 0 0 43 0
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1019
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 4 0 58 X X X X 4
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:05
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:30
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1020
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 48 - 57MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
1021
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *
33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 0 1 32 X 1 A
31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%
29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 6
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1022
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:20
52 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 7
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:40
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A
43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1023
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:55
59 0 0 59 0
58 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 2 0 56 X X 2
55 3 2 55 X X X X X 5
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 *
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13% 45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5
42 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1024
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:10
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:50
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%
29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%
27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%
25 2 2 25 X X X X 4
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
1025
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 4 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 5 3 51 X X X X X X X X 8 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 *
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 38% 44% 41%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 C
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 60% 54% 56%
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 2% 2% 3%
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 *
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43MPH 35 - 44MPH 35 - 44MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
1026
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 6
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:40
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:15
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/22/21
1027
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47MPH 38 - 47MPH 38 - 47MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
5/19/22
1028
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:40
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 0 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:00
49 1 1 49 X X 2 *
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E
43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1029
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:30
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:20
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing 37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 1 0 34 X 1
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5
32 2 0 32 X X 2
31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1030
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 0 0 45 0
44 3 0 44 X X X 3 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 10:45
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 2 3 40 X X X X X 5 * To: 11:55
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 * Existing
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH
36 5 3 36 X X X X X X X X 8 A
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 C
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
31 0 8 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 16% 28% 25%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 76% 60% 65%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1031
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:20
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:40
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%
49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E
46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11% 45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 0 3 41 X X X 3
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 38 0 1 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1032
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time
50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:20
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1033
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:50
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:10
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing
47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%
37 0 0 37 0
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1034
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 1 63 X 1 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 1 1 62 X X 2
61 0 0 61 0
60 1 1 60 X X 2 Weather: Clear
59 1 1 59 X X 2
58 1 0 58 X 1
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 Date:
56 3 3 56 X X X X X X 6
55 3 1 55 X X X X 4
54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 * Time
53 4 3 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:25
52 5 2 52 X X X X X X X 7 *
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 P Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 A To: 10:45
49 4 5 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 3 6 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 5 1 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 1 0 40 X 1 % Over Pace: 18% 26% 23%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 66% 66% 66%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1035
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive 62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 1 61 X 1
60 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 1 1 58 X X 2
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:
56 1 3 56 X X X X 4
55 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:55
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P
51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time
50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:15
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1036
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / PMPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound StatisticsSouthbound StatisticsCombined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51MPH 41 - 50MPH 41 - 50MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1037
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 2 56 X X 2
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:10
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time
50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:30
49 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing
47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1038
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:50
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:20
49 4 2 49 X X X X X X 6
48 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C
41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%
39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
1039
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:00
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P
52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A
51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13% 49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *
48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH
43 0 1 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1040
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue) 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:00
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:25
59 0 1 59 X 1
58 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5
55 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *
52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P
51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%
49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E
48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 6
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1041
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
1042
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 7
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time
53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:45
52 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *
51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time
50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:05
49 1 2 49 X X X 3 C
48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 2 3 44 X X X X X 5
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%
37 3 0 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1043
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 4 1 56 X X X X X 5
55 2 2 55 X X X X 4
54 2 0 54 X X 2 Time
53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:05
52 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:25
49 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A
48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing
47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 6
42 0 4 42 X X X X 4
41 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1044
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
1045
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:20
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:15
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%
35 0 4 35 X X X X 4
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1046
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:00
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C
34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%
29 4 0 29 X X X X 4
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4
26 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%
25 3 0 25 X X X 3
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1047
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49MPH 42 - 51MPH 41 - 50MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
9/14/21
1048
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:20
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%
37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 4
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 3 30 X X X 3
29 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1049
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 12:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:45
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *
45 8 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 P
43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
42 8 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 14% 18% 16%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 82% 74% 78%
37 1 1 37 X X 2
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 8% 6%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1050
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 2 0 55 X X 2
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:15
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:35
49 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1051
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:50
59 3 2 59 X X X X X 5
58 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P
54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A
53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C
52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%
49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 2 0 43 X X 2
42 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 1 40 X 1
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1052
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:30
52 3 1 52 X X X X 4
51 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:50
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C
45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1053
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 1 54 X X 2 Time
53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:55
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing
47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%
39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1054
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 To: 9:25
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 6 2 35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 2 4 34 X X X X X X 6 A
33 2 2 33 X X X X 4 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 5 3 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 26% 12% 27% 29 1 5 29 X X X X X X 6 *
28 2 1 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 64% 70% 64%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 10% 18% 9%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 28 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
6/5/18
1055
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:25
42 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:00
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing
37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4
31 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
1056
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:20
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:40
39 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 0 4 34 X X X X 4
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 1 1 32 X X 2
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%
29 2 0 29 X X 2
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
7/29/21
1057
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:00
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:25
49 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1058
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 3 56 X X X 3
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:00
52 0 2 52 X X 2 *
51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time
50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:20
49 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E
45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/17/21
1059
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.
Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing
37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 0 2 35 X X 2 P
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A
33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%
29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
2/18/21
1060
1061
APPENDIX F
Collision Data Sheets
Updated September 2022
1062
1063
Mid-Block Collisions
58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1064
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1065
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1066
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1067
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1068
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1069
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1070
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1071
Mid-Block Collisions
Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1072
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1073
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1074
Mid-Block Collisions
Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1075
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
(Continued on Next Page)
1076
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 2)
(Continued on Next Page)
1077
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 3)
1078
Mid-Block Collisions
Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1079
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1080
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1081
Mid-Block Collisions
Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1082
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Citrus Street/South City Limit and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1083
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
(Continued on Next Page)
1084
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 2)
1085
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
(Continued on Next Page)
1086
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 2)
(Continued on Next Page)
1087
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 3)
1088
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1089
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1090
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between River Road and Chandler Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1091
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1092
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Limonite Ave and North City Limit July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1093
Mid-Block Collisions
Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1094
Mid-Block Collisions
Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1095
Mid-Block Collisions
Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1096
Mid-Block Collisions
River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1097
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverboat Drive between Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1098
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
(Continued on Next Page)
1099
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 2)
1100
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1101
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1102
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1103
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1104
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1105
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1106
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
1107
Mid-Block Collisions
Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
No Relevant Reported Collisions Found.
1108
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP
(Continued on Next Page)
1109
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 2)
(Continued on Next Page)
1110
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway August 1, 2019 – July 31, 2022
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP (Page 3)
1111
APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
(Updated September 2022)
1112
1113
1114
1115
ORDINANCE NO. 23-XX (DRAFT)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO
THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Accident Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Section 22357 and 22358.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:
No Street Between
85th
Percentile
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 44
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 42 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
1116
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 55 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 55
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 55
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 47
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 56
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47 39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 39
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
1117
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 (b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above- listed streets are set forth herein.
Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.
The following speed limits are as established:
No. Street Between (mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street/East City Limit 35 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit 50 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50
Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 40
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 50
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
Schleisman Road and Blossom Way 45
28 29
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
1118
30 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
31 32
Limonite Avenue Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 50
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 45
33 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 34 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
35 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 36 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
37 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 38 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
39 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50 40 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
41 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
42 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
43 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 35
44 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
45 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
46 47
Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
48 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.
1119
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this 11th day of January, 2023. _______________________________________
Clint Lorimore
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
____________________________ _____________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
1120
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §
CITY OF EASTVALE )
I, Marc A. Donahue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 23-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 14th day of December, 2022, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of January, 2023, by the following vote:
AYES: XX
NOES: XX
ABSENT: XX
ABSTAIN: XX
_____________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
1121
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
Agenda Item No. 16.1
December 14, 2022
LIABILITY CLAIMS (Government Code § 54956.95) Claimant:
Unspecified pursuant to Government Code § 54961. Agency
claimed against: City of Eastvale
Prepared By:
Recommended Action(s)
Not Applicable.
Summary
Not Applicable.
Background
Not Applicable.
Environmental
Not Applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level:
N/A
| Target #:
N/A
| Goal #:
N/A
Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.
Attachment(s)
Not Applicable.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
1122
AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council Meeting
CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
Agenda Item No. 16.2
December 14, 2022
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
(Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: In the Ma6er of the Appeal of Membership Determina8on and Post Re8rement Employment of C. Bradshaw, J. Indrawan, J. Riley, T. Steenson, and L. Westhaver (CalPERS OAH No. 2021120040)
Prepared By:
Recommended Action(s)
Not Applicable.
Summary
Not Applicable.
Background
Not Applicable.
Environmental
Not Applicable.
Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level:
N/A
| Target #:
N/A
| Goal #:
N/A
Not Applicable.
Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.
Attachment(s)
Not Applicable. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
1123