Agenda packet — Eastvale City Council, January 24, 2024 (part 3 of 3)

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Project (Phase 1)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A design build project to construct a Phase 1 of the Civic Center Project, which includes approximately 50,000 square foot City Hall, a 25,000 square foot library, a police station with an associated parking garage, a park, and a civic plaza.

PROJECT STATUS: A consultant was procured to perform architectural, engineering, and interior design on May 10, 2023.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Tentative milestones:
• Start architectural, engineering, and interior design: May 11, 2023; • Construction Document Completion (100% design): June 30, 2024; • Start Construction: December 1, 2024;
• Complete Construction: November 30, 2026;
PROJECT MAP:

455

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 2 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Gap Closure
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will connect from 2,450 LF east of Hellman Ave to Archibald Avenue. The total length of the proposed project is approximately 3,200 LF including a bridge over the Cucamonga Creek. Both road and bridge will serve 4 lanes of traffic including bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

PROJECT STATUS: Construction Management service procured.

Contraction contract was awarded to Ortiz on July 26, 2023.

A notice to proceed was issued to Ortiz on August 30, 2023.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Construction activities began on September 5, 2023 with a construction duration of 260 working days.

PROJECT MAP:

Proposed Limonite Ave Bridge
Proposed Pedestrian Bridge
456

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 3 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity/ATP Trails PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and construct nearly 5 miles of trails running along Scholar Way and Harrison Avenue. The project will provide dedicated space for people to bike and walk from north Eastvale to the Santa Ana River Trail on the south.

PROJECT STATUS: Design contract was awarded to Mark Thomas. 30% plans and specifications have been delivered.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Mark Thomas is going to start Phase 2 efforts consisting of developing construction documents.

PROJECT MAP:

457

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 4 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will identify and prioritize potential traffic safety improvements in the City as well as providing foundational information for submittal of future grant application.

PROJECT STATUS: The final report was approved at December 13, 2023 City Council meeting.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: A final project invoice will be submitted to Caltrans for reimbursement and close out the project.

PROJECT MAP:

458

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 5 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Retroreflective Backplate on Traffic Signal Indicator PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install retroreflective backplate borders along backplates of traffic signal indicators at 39 signalized intersections to improve the visibility of signals.

PROJECT STATUS: Construction is complete.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: A final project invoice will be submitted to Caltrans for reimbursement and close out the project.

PROJECT MAP:

459

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 6 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Signal Dilemma Zone Detection and Mitigation PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will install advanced dilemma zone detection system and associated equipment in existing traffic signal cabinets at 16 signalized intersections to modify signal timing to improve safety for motorists approaching intersections.

PROJECT STATUS: Construction contract was awarded on September 13, 2023 Council meeting, and construction management service has been procured.

The contractor is working on necessary permits and ordering materials.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Construction Award- September 13, 2023 The construction field work is estimated to commen ce in Q1 2024.

PROJECT MAP:

460

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 7 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: ADA Transition Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Program includes preparation and implementation of an ADA Self Evaluation Plan as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Future year funding will support removal of ADA barriers as identified in the Plan. Annual program to provide improvements focusing on ADA accessibility, including curb ramps and sidewalks throughout the City.

PROJECT STATUS: Professional Services Agreement was signed with Bureau Veritas Technical Assessment. Notice to Proceed was issued on December 20, 2023.

461

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 8 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Archibald Avenue/Limonite Avenue Widening Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Street widening and safety project for Archibald Avenue from the City of Ontario limits south of the SCE easement, including the intersection at Limonite Avenue and portions of Limonite Avenue east and west of the intersection. The project looks to improve safety and overall circulation in conjunction with the improvements associated with the Homestead and Merge developments, and Limonite Gap Project. Components of the project include, but are not limited to, coordinating with SCE to relocate SCE high-tension support structures.

PROJECT STATUS: • Installation of new transmission poles is completed. • Existing poles were removed mid-July, allowing the Developers to start coordinating their construction schedules.
• Widening and street improvements started on Septemb er 11, 2023 with an anticipated completion by Summer 2024.

PROJECT MAP:

LIMONITE AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
462

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 9 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Merge
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements includes 26 gross acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing Grading completed for Pad 2
Developer is also responsible for improvements along Archibald Avenue which are currently underway.

PROJECT MAP:

ARCHIBALD AVE

LIMONITE AVE
463

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 10 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch by Transwestern
PROJECT NUMBER: PW19-11322
PROJECT LOCATION: East end of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 20 gross acres including 2 light industrial warehouses.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements have been completed, the City and Developer are working together to close out the project.

PROJECT MAP:

CUCAMONGA CREEK

HELLMAN AVE
464

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 11 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Homestead
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10052
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 55.86 gross acres consisting of six industrial buildings
PROJECT STATUS: Onsite and offsite improvements ongoing Developer is also responsible for improvements along Archibald Avenue which are currently underway.

PROJECT MAP:

LIMONITE AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
465

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 12 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Vantage Point Church
PROJECT NUMBER: PW15-1174
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Prado Basin Park Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include development of an approximate ly 85,000 sq. ft. church which includes a sanctuary, classrooms, cafe, and a bookstore on 10.43 acres.

PROJECT STATUS:

Phase 2 has begun, and the improvements will include the widening of Archibald Ave.

Vantage Point Church has started working with City Staff to apply for the encroachment permit.

PROJECT MAP:

466

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 13 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Hamner Place
PROJECT NUMBER: PW18-10712
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 21.48 gross acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
Heroes just opened onsite, the archway has been erected Hardscape is complete for the 7/11
PROJECT MAP:

HAMNER AVE
467

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 14 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: The Ranch (Parcel 14)
PROJECT NUMBER: PW20-10007
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Limonite Avenue west of the Cucamonga Creek PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include the development of 61,000 square foot industrial building.

PROJECT STATUS: Developer is working on closing out the project.

PROJECT MAP:

CUCAMONGA CREEK
468

EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 15 of 15 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Eastwalk/ Leal
PROJECT NUMBER: PW22-1004
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Hamner Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 158.6 acre development that will include approximately 2500 residential units as well as plans for future commercial development PROJECT STATUS: Mass Grading is complete for Phase 1 of the project, Rough Grading is approved and ongoing. Developer plans to begin construction February 2024.

PROJECT MAP:

HAMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY
58 TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE
469

AGENCY GRANT NAME PROJECT NAME GRANT AWARD MATCH DUE DATE STATUS California Transportation
Commission/California
Department of Transportation
ATP: Active Transportation Project Cycle 4 Improvement of Bike Network Connectivity $ 6,471,000.00 $ 1,620,000.00 Grant request has been
approved. The project is
currently under design.

California Transportation
Commission/California
Department of Transportation
LPP: Local Partnership Program Limonite Gap Closure Project 9,475,000.00 $ - $ Grant request has been
approved. Allocation for
construction funds was
requested and approved.

California Department of
Transportation
HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement
Program Cycle 10
Advanced Dilemma Zone Detection
712,800.00 $ - $ CON allocation was approved.

The project will be advertised for
construction soon.

California Department of
Transportation
HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement
Program Cycle 10
Retroflective Backplate for Signals
278,100.00 $ - $ Construction contract was
awarded in January 2023. Under
Construction
California Department of
Resources Recycling and
Recovery
CalRecycle: Rubberized Pavement Grant
TRP 13
Annual Overlay Project
$ 174,999.00 $ - March 30, 2024 Grant request has been
approved. Extension request
submitted.

South Coast AQMD Mobile
Source Air Pollution Reduction
SCAQMD/MSRC Contract ML18064 Electric Medium Duty Vehicle Purchase $ 51,722.00 $ 51,722.00 April 1, 2023 Extension to be submitted based
on lack on inventory.

South Coast AQMD Mobile
Source Air Pollution Reduction
SCAQMD/MSRC Contract ML16040 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations $ 12,500.00 $ 12,500.00 July 5, 2023 Under design
U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development
Community Development Block Grant TBD $ 196,130.00 $ - June 30, 2024 CAL FIRE Resource Management Grant City of Eastvale Urban Forestry Management $ 249,925.00 $ 60,024.00 March 30, 2024 Under design USDOT: Department of
Transportation
Congressman Calvert: 2023 Transportation
and Infrastructure Appropriations Bill Limonite Gap Pedistrian Bridge 1,600,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ Riverside County
Transportation Commission
2023 Western Riverside County Regional
Arterials Limonite Gap Closure 13,500,000.00 $ $ 13,500,000.00

AGENCY GRANT NAME PROJECT NAME GRANT AWARD MATCH ANNOUNCE DATE STATUS California Department of
Resources Recycling and
Recovery
CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement (TRP)
Grant Program Annual Overlay Project
Up to $250,000 December 2023 Application in review

PUBLIC WORKS GRANTS SUMMARY

GRANTS AWARDED

GRANTS IN PROGRESS
470

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.7
January 24, 2024
City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – October & November 2023 Prepared By:

Eva Terekhova, Emergency Management Specialist & Rebecca Hernandez, Community Safety Intern Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council receive and ﬁle the Eastvale Crime Sta$s$cs for October & November 2023.

Summary
The City Council requested staﬀ to collaborate with the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department to develop a crime sta$s$cs document that would reﬂect selected Part I and Part II crime data for the City of Eastvale. Intended to show month-to-month crime sta$s$cs, the document will assist in determining appropriate staffing levels for law enforcement services.

Background
In May 2017, City Council directed staﬀ to coordinate with the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department to request and obtain monthly crime sta$s$cs for the City of Eastvale. The primary intent of the request was to determine appropriate staﬃng levels during the City’s contract nego$a$ons with the Sheriﬀ’s Department. Over several weeks, the city manager and staﬀ worked collabora$vely with Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department administra$on and management to obtain crime statistics that could be shared with the public on a regular basis.

Upon receiving the data, the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department advised staﬀ that the data provided would be reﬂec$ve of the previous month, or thirty days behind the current month; and that the report would need to include a disclaimer identifying the data as preliminary and raw.

At the July 26, 2017 mee$ng, City Council recommended that staﬀ add columns reﬂec$ve of felony 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
471
and misdemeanor arrests. During the September 26, 2017 mee$ng, City Council recommended staﬀ add traﬃc viola$ons/cita$ons data and the total calls for service broken down per month. Crime sta$s$cs that were released in the $me that passed since the last mee$ng of the City Council are attached.

Environmental
Crime sta$s$cs are not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
This request has no fiscal impact.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
July 25, 2017: Approved by the Public Safety Commission September 26, 2017: Approved by City Council
Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - October 2023 Eastvale Crime Statistics

Attachment 2 - November 2023 Eastvale Crime Statistics

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
472
City of Eastvale
Crime Statistics
October 2023

Violent Crime Statistics

VIOLENT CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2023 POPULATION = 69,929

OCT
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000
JUL
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000

YEAR TO
DATE
2023

YEAR TO
DATE
2022
YEAR
TO
DATE
2021
HOMICIDE 0 0 2 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
RAPE 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 9 6 2
ROBBERY 3 0.04 2 0.03 3 0.04 1 0.01 2 0.04 22 24 23

AGGRAVATED
ASSAULT 21 0.30 3 0.04 12 0.17 12 0.17 23 0.33 117 63 51 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 0 0 3 1 0

TOTAL 24 N/A 7 N/A 16 N/A 14 N/A 25 N/A 151 96 72
YEAR POPULATION TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S
2022 69,929 26,411
2021 67,626 25,104
2020 66,413 23,778
2019 66,078 24,587
2018 64,855 28,383
2017 64,613 32,295
LEGEND
 All data in this report was retrieved from the Riverside Sheriff’s Office (RSO) Data Warehouse Reports system. The figures represented are dynamic and subject to change based on the rate at which information is composed and entered in the Data Warehouse system.
 Source of population data: State of California, Department of Finance.  “Total calls for service/file #s generated” encompass ALL call types inclusive of the ones listed and not listed on this chart.
 Year to Date (YTD) is calendar year.

TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S GENERATED
YEAR: 2023 POPULATION: 69,929 TOTAL YTD: 21,943

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1,929 2,066 2,349 2,495 2,056 2,100 2,328 2,146 2,247 2,227 Non-Violent Crime Statistics

PROPERTY CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2023 POPULATION = 69,929

OCT
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
JUL
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000

YEAR TO
DATE
2023

YEAR TO
DATE
2022

YEAR TO
DATE
2021
BURGLARY 12 0.17 13 0.19 15 0.21 11 0.16 16 0.23 127 146 158 VEHICLE THEFT 19 0.27 11 0.16 21 0.17 12 0.17 14 0.34 174 147 140 LARCENY THEFT 82 1.17 100 1.43 76 1.09 75 1.07 75 1.07 756 940 601 MAIL THEFT 4 0.06 3 0.04 2 0.03 3 0.04 6 0.06 40 33 69
INJURY TCS 14 0.20 15 0.21 4 0.11 8 0.11 5 0.07 92 134 136 FELONY ARREST 22 0.31 20 0.29 15 0.27 19 0.27 18 0.26 184 243 227

MISDEMEANOR
ARREST 31 0.44 57 0.82 15 0.51 36 0.51 24 0.34 287 438 243

TRAFFIC
CITATIONS 274 3.92 478 6.84 176 5.51 385 5.51 412 5.89 3,819 4,451 3,674

TOTAL N/A 697 N/A 559 N/A 559 N/A 573 N/A 5,479 6,532 5,248 473
City of Eastvale
Crime Statistics
November 2023

Violent Crime Statistics

VIOLENT CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2023 POPULATION = 69,929

NOV
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
NOV
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000
AUG
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000

YEAR TO
DATE
2023

YEAR TO
DATE
2022
YEAR
TO
DATE
2021
HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0.03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1
RAPE 1 0.01 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 0 0 10 6 2
ROBBERY 5 0.07 1 0.03 3 0.04 3 0.04 1 0.01 27 24 23

AGGRAVATED
ASSAULT 15 0.21 2 0.04 21 0.30 12 0.17 12 0.17 132 63 51 ARSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.01 3 1 0

TOTAL 21 N/A 3 N/A 24 N/A 16 N/A 14 N/A 172 96 72
YEAR POPULATION TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S
2022 69,929 26,411
2021 67,626 25,104
2020 66,413 23,778
2019 66,078 24,587
2018 64,855 28,383
2017 64,613 32,295
LEGEND
 All data in this report was retrieved from the Riverside Sheriff’s Office (RSO) Data Warehouse Reports system. The figures represented are dynamic and subject to change based on the rate at which information is composed and entered in the Data Warehouse system.
 Source of population data: State of California, Department of Finance.  “Total calls for service/file #s generated” encompass ALL call types inclusive of the ones listed and not listed on this chart.
 Year to Date (YTD) is calendar year.

TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE/FILE #S GENERATED
YEAR: 2023 POPULATION: 69,929 TOTAL YTD: 24,107

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
1,929 2,066 2,349 2,495 2,056 2,100 2,328 2,146 2,247 2,227 2,164 Non-Violent Crime Statistics

PROPERTY CRIMES
ESTIMATED 2023 POPULATION = 69,929

NOV
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
NOV
2022
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
OCT
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
SEP
2023
CRIME
RATE
PER
1000
AUG
2023
CRIME

RATE PER
1000

YEAR TO
DATE
2023

YEAR TO
DATE
2022

YEAR TO
DATE
2021
BURGLARY 7 0.10 17 0.19 12 0.17 15 0.21 11 0.16 134 146 158 VEHICLE THEFT 8 0.11 12 0.16 19 0.27 21 0.17 12 0.17 182 147 140 LARCENY THEFT 97 1.39 71 1.43 82 1.17 76 1.09 75 1.07 853 940 601 MAIL THEFT 11 0.16 0 0.04 4 0.06 2 0.03 3 0.04 51 33 69 INJURY TCS 20 0.29 7 0.21 14 0.20 4 0.11 8 0.11 112 134 136 FELONY ARREST 12 0.17 16 0.29 22 0.31 15 0.27 19 0.27 196 243 227

MISDEMEANOR
ARREST 22 0.31 37 0.82 31 0.44 15 0.51 36 0.51 309 438 243

TRAFFIC
CITATIONS 451 6.45 583 6.84 274 3.92 176 5.51 385 5.51 4,270 4,451 3,674

TOTAL 628 N/A 743 N/A 458 N/A 559 N/A 559 N/A 6,107 6,532 5,248 474

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.8
January 24, 2024
Annual Development Impact Fee Report as of June 30, 2023 Prepared By:

Luis De La Hoya, Finance Manager
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council receive and ﬁle Annual Development Impact Fees Report as of June 30, 2023.

Summary
Pursuant to the Mi(ga(on Fee Act (the “Act”) (Government Code sec(on 66000 et seq.), and speciﬁcally sec(on 66006 of the Act, the following report on the receipt, use and reten(on of development impact fees for Fiscal Year 2022-23 is hereby presented to the City Council for review.

Development impact fees are charged by local governments to defray all or a por(on of the cost of public facili(es related to new development being constructed within the City. The requirements for enactment of a development impact fee program are set forth in the Act, which was enacted by the State Legislature as Assembly Bill No. 1600 (2016) and is commonly referred to as “AB 1600 requirements”.

The Act requires two speciﬁc repor(ng requirements from the City: 1) A periodic (ﬁve-year) report to make ﬁndings with respect to all unexpended mi(ga(on fees and 2) an annual review of all development impact fees as deﬁned in the Act and to make a public report on the fees available to the public a;er the end of each ﬁscal year. The annual report is included herein. The report must provide the beginning and ending balances of the ﬁscal year, the amount of fees collected by the City, interest income and any other income earned, a descrip(on of how the fees were expended during the subject ﬁscal year, and any refunds or alloca(ons pursuant to Government Code Sec(on 66001(f).
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
475
If fees are not expended or remain uncommiBed for a period of ﬁve or more years, the report must include a ﬁnding iden(fying the purpose of the fee and the an(cipated improvements to be ﬁnanced by the fee. If such ﬁndings are not made, State law requires that the City refund the unused fees being held.

Background
Development impact fees may be collected by the City of Eastvale for the purpose of mi(ga(ng the impacts caused by new development on the City’s infrastructure. Fees are used to ﬁnance the acquisi(on, construc(on, and improvement of public facili(es required as a result of this new development. A separate funding structure has been established to account for the impact of new development on each of the following types of public facili(es: Transporta(on Facili(es, Fire Facilities, Public Facilities, and Road and Bridge Facilities.

On April 11, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolu(on No. 12-15, establishing the City’s development impact fees in accordance with the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study dated April 2, 2012. The current Development Impact Fee schedule does not account for inﬂa(onary or consumer price index increases, as a result the fees have been sta(c since the adop(on of the fee schedule in 2012.

Environmental
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
This action does not have an immediate impact on the General Fund.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
The City completed a Development Impact Fee Study in 2012 and adopted fees by resolu(on eﬀec(ve July 1, 2012. In 2023, staﬀ completed the second ﬁve-year periodic report as of June 30, 2012. An annual report was prepared for the period ended June 30, 2022 in December 2022.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2023 DIF Report

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
476
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

Background
The Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code Section 66000 et seq., (the “Act”) governs the establishment and administration of development impact fees paid by new development projects for public facilities needed to serve new development. Fees must be separate ly accounted for and used for the specific purpose for which the fee was imposed. The City’s adopted development impact fees are listed in the attached exhibits.

Expenditures are authorized through the annual Operating Budget and the City’s Capital Improve ment Program.

Development Fee Reporting
The Act mandates two specific reporting requirements for the city:
• A periodic (five-year) report making certain findings with respect to all unexpended mitigation fees; and,
• An annual review of all development impact fees as defined in the Act , in a public report after the close of each fiscal year.

Government Code Section 66006(b)(2) requires the report be placed on an agenda for review at a public meeting not less than 15 days after the report is made available to the public. The City is also required to adopt by resolution certain findings, as defined in the Act, for any unexpended balances of mitigations fees as of the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into those funds (Government Code Section 66001(d)). The City completed a Development Impact Fee study in 2012 and adopted fees by resolution effective July 1, 2012. The city initially adopted the County of Riverside Development Impact Fees when it incorporated on October 1, 2010, and used those fee amounts until adoption of updated City fees in June 2012.

The report is organized as follows:

Section 1. A brief description of the purpose of each development impact fee, its authorizing legislation and current amount (Government Code Section 66006(b) (1) (A)).

Section 2. A summary of the beginning fund balance on July 1, 202 2, annual fee revenue collected, interest earned, public improvement expenditures, and the endi ng fund balance at June 30, 2023 for each fee (Government Code Section 66006(b)(1)(B)-(H)).

Section 3. A listing of projects funded or to be funded with development impact fees (Government Code Section 66006(b)(1)(E)).

Section 4. Report of Findings for each fee.

477
Detail
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 2

SECTION 1 | Fee Descriptions

The City’s Development Impact Fees (DIF) were first adopted at incorporation on October 1, 2010, adopting the fees that were being charged by the County of Riverside at the time. In April 2012, a nexus study was done to update the fees, effective July 1, 2012. The following development impact fees were adopted:
transportation facilities development impact fee, fire facilities development impact fee, and the public facilities development impact fee. Subsequently, a fourth fee was adopted, the Road and Bridge Benefit District. A description of each fee is noted below:

Transportation Facilities
The purpose of the Transportation Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide traffic amenities adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by the City’s master planning process.

The 2012 Nexus Study identified a total of $8.4 million in capital facilities costs for facilities related to transportation. The transportation facilities identified were as follows:

1. Road improvements: Hellman Avenue one lane bridge widening over Cucamonga Creek.

2. Limonite Bridge over Cucamonga Channel

3. New Traffic Signals: 23 new traffic signals.

Cost estimates for the facilities include design, permitting, land acquisition, construction, and project administration.

The fee amount for the Transportation Facilities Development Impact Fee is as follows:

Land Use Maximum Fee
Single Family Residential $693 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $487 per dwelling unit
Commercial/ Retail $1,685 per 1,000 square feet of building space Light Industrial/Warehousing $352 per 1,000 square feet of building space Office/Business Park $373 per 1,000 square feet of building space

Fire Facilities
The purpose of the Fire Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide fire protection, fire suppression and other fire safety services adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by operational standards and planning criteria.

The 2012 Nexus Study identified a total of $8.9 million in capital facilities costs for fire facilities. The fire facilities identified were as follows:

1. Eastvale Fire Station No. 27.
478
Detail
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 3

2. Eastvale Fire Station, additional

Cost estimates for the facilities include design, permitting, land acquisition, construction, and project administration.

The fee amount for the Fire Facilities Development Impact Fee is as follows:

Land Use Maximum Fee
Single Family Residential $481 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $332 per dwelling unit
Commercial/ Retail $132 per 1,000 square feet of building space Light Industrial/Warehousing $137 per 1,000 square feet of building space Office/Business Park $132 per 1,000 square feet of building space

Public Facilities
The purpose of the Public Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide general governmental and related civic services adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by the City’s capital improvement programs, long -range planning, and strategic planning.

The 2012 Nexus Study identified a total of $ 13.4 million in capital facilities costs for facilities related to governmental and community services. The public facilities identified were as follows:

1. Civic Center: Governmental Services

2. Civic Center: Police Services

Cost estimates for the facilities include design, permitting, land acquisition, construction, and project administration.

The fee amount for the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee is as follows:

Land Use Maximum Fee
Single Family Residential $942 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $650 per dwelling unit
Commercial/ Retail $150 per 1,000 square feet of building space Light Industrial/Warehousing $156 per 1,000 square feet of building space Office/Business Park $150 per 1,000 square feet of building space

Road and Bridge Benefit District
The Road and Bridge Benefit District (District) DIF is inherited from the County of Riverside associated with incorporation of the city. The city accepted responsibility for the portion of the district within the city’s footprint. The district was created to ensure that new development within the district’s boundaries pays its 479
Detail
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 4

proportionate share of the necessary capital investments required to provide the y road and bridge improvements within the district adequate for the growing service population, consistent with the standards and needs defined by the City’s capital improvement programs, long-range planning, and strategic planning.

The most recent update of the Nexus Study in support of the DIF was completed by the County of Riverside in 2005. That study identified a total of $ 47.1 million (net of fees collected to date at that time) in capital facilities costs for projects needed within the district to meet its obligation to fund adequate roads and bridges within the district’s boundaries.

Cost estimates for the facilities include design, permitting, land acquisition, construction, and project administration.

The fee amount for the Road and Bridge Benefit District Development Impact Fee are broken down into zones within the original County district. Fee amounts are listed below:

Land Use Maximum Fee
Single Family Residential $884 – $2681 per dwelling unit Multi-Family Residential $417 – $1,857 per dwelling unit Commercial/ Retail $2652 – $9,117 per acre
Light Industrial/Warehousing $2652 – $9,117 per acre
Office/Business Park $2652 – $9,117 per acre

480

CI TY OF EASTVALE
Annual R epor t on D evel opm ent I m pact Fees
Fi scal Year Ended June 30, 2023
D et ai l
Sect i on 2 | Begi nni ng Fund Bal ance
Fiscal Transportation Fire Public Road & Bridge
Year Facilities Facilities Facilities Benefit Dist. Total BEGINNING BALANCE 7/1/2022 423,775$ 538,832$ 590,338$ 6,670,033$ 8,222,979$

REVENUES
Fees Received:
2022/23 498,894$ 56,298$ 64,108$ 51,416$ 670,717$ Total 498,894$ 56,298$ 64,108$ 51,416$ 670,717$ Interest Income:
2022/23 21,724$ 14,538$ 5,864$ 167,054$ 209,180$ Unrealized Gain:
2022/23 6,587$ 8,376$ 8,903$ 98,573$ 122,440$ Total 28,311$ 22,914$ 14,767$ 265,627$ 331,619$ Total Revenues FY 2022/23 527,206$ 79,212$ 78,876$ 317,043$ 1,002,337$

EXPENDITURES
Cost Allocation:
2022/23 3,040$ 1,290$ 4,020$ -$ 8,350$ Unrealized Loss:
2022/23 -$
Total 3,040$ 1,290$ 4,020$ -$ 8,350$ Capital Expenditures:

Hamner Place 95001-0000 95001-0002 & 95001-0003 -$ -$ 490,000$ -$ 490,000$ Landscape Median Improvement 93029-0000 Phase 1 Limonite -$ -$ -$ 184$ 184$ 2022/23 -$ -$ 490,000$ 184$ 490,184$ Total -$ -$ 490,000$ 184$ 490,184$ Total Expenditures FY 2022/23 3,040$ 1,290$ 494,020$ 184$ 498,534$ ENDING BALANCE 06/30/2023 947,941$ 616,755$ 175,194$ 6,986,893$ 8,726,782$ City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 481

CI TY OF EASTVALE
Annual R epor t on D evel opm ent I m pact Fees
Fi scal Year Ended June 30, 2023
D et ai l
Sect i on 3 | Pr oj ect Li st i ng
Transportation Fire Public Road & Bridge Total DIF Other Funding % of DIF vs Other Facilities Facilities Facilities Benefit Dist. Funds Sources Funding Sources Est. Project
Completion Status
Date

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2022/23 Activity
Civic Center Project 95001-0000 95001-0002 & 95001-0003 2024 In Progress -$ -$ 490,000$ -$ 490,000$ 1,980,903$ 20% Landscape Median Improvement 93029-0000 Phase 1 Limonite 2023 Complete - - - 184 184$ - 100% Total 2022/23 -$ -$ 490,000$ 184$ 490,184$ 1,980,903$ Total Capital Expenditures to 06/30/2023 -$ -$ 490,000$ 184$ 490,184$ 1,980,903$ 20%

UNSPENT COMMITTED FUNDS IN APPROVED PROJECTS
2022/23 and Beyond Committed Funds:
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Unspent Committed Funds -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

FUTURE PROJECTS PLANNED
Tentative Traffic Signal Installation Project 2025 500,000$ 500,000$ Tentative Hellman Ave Bridge Widening Project 2025 500,000$ 500,000$ Tentative Landscape Median Project 2024 800,000$
Tentative Public Works Yard and Offices 2025 -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ Tentative Fire Station #3 2025 -$ 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ Total Future Projects Planned 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$ 2,500,000$ -$ City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 482
Detail
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 5

Section 4 | Report of Findings
(Government Code Section 66001(d))

Transportation Facilities

1. The purpose of the Transportation Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide traffic amenities adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by the city’s master planning process.

2. The reasonable relationship between the Transportation Facilities DIF and the purpose for which it is charged is demonstrated in the City of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

3. The sources and amount of funding anticipated to complete the Transportation Facilities is in the city of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

4. The approximate date for funding and constructing some of the Transportation Facilities is noted in the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 through 2027-2028.

5. Future projects that are planned do not have an estimated date for completion as these projects will be connected to new development within the city.

Fire Facilities

1. The purpose of the Fire Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide fire protection, fire suppression and other fire safety services adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by operational standards and planning criteria.

2. The reasonable relationship between the Fire Facilities DIF and the purpose for which it is charged is demonstrated in the City of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

3. The sources and amount of funding anticipated to complete the Fire Facilities was in the City of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

4. The date for funding and constructing the new Fire Facilities will be included in the Capital Improvement Program in future years as projects are programmed . Future expansion of the Fire Facilities has not been determined at this time but will be considered as the city develops further.

483
Detail
City of Eastvale
Annual Report on Development Impact Fees
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 6

Public Facilities

1. The purpose of the Public Facilities DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city, which are necessary to provide general governmental and related civic services adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by the c ity’s capital improvement programs, long- range planning, and strategic planning.

2. The reasonable relationship between the Public Facilities DIF and the purpose for which it is charged is demonstrated in the City of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

3. The sources and amount of funding anticipated to complete the Public Facilities is in the City of Eastvale Development Impact Fee Study dated February 2, 2012, effective July 1, 2012.

4. The approximate date for funding and constructing of the Public Facilities is noted in the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 through 202 7-2028. Future expansion of Public Facilities has not been determined at this time but will be considered as the city is built out.

Road and Bridge Benefit District

1. The purpose of the Road and Bridge Benefit District ( district) DIF is to ensure that new development within the City of Eastvale pays its proportionate share of the capital investments made by the city to provide necessary road and bridge improvements within the district adequate to accommodate a growing service population within the standards and needs defined by the c ity’s capital improvement programs, long-range planning, and strategic planning.

2. The reasonable relationship between the Road and Bridge Benefit District DIF and the purpose for which it is charged is demonstrated in the C ounty of Riverside Road and Bridge Development Impact Fee Update Report dated November 1, 2005, effective January 7, 2006.

3. The sources and amount of funding anticipated to complete the Road and Bridge projects are in the County of Riverside Development Impact Fee Update Report dated November 1 , 20 05, effective January 7, 2006.

4. The approximate date for funding and constructing of Road and Bridge projects is noted in the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 through 2027-2028. Future capital projects to meet the city’s need for road and bridge expansion within the district have not been determined at this time but will be considered as the city develops further.

484

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.9
January 24, 2024
Adoption of Ordinance Amending Penalties for Cannabis Violations Prepared By:

Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance, entled:

AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 120.04.150 (CANNABIS FACILITIES, CULTIVATION, AND DELIVERIES) TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE

Summary
The City of Eastvale is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adopon of ordinances and resoluons, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the excepon of urgency ordinances, Government Code Secon 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than ﬁve days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the me of introducon or passage unless a moon waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. This Ordinance amendment was ﬁrst introduced at the duly noticed City Council regular meeting on January 10, 2024.

Background
On January 10, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to Secon 120.04.150 (Cannabis Facilies, Culvaon, and Deliveries) of the Eastvale municipal code to ensure consistency with Assembly Bill (AB) 1684.

Assembly Bill 1684 went into eﬀect January 1, 2024, and made certain amendments to the statute governing the City’s ability to impose administrave ﬁnes or penales on the unlicensed culvaon, manufacturing, processing, distribuon, or retail sale of cannabis. Per AB 1684, ﬁne amounts that the City may impose for cannabis violaons are limited to $1,000 per violaon and $10,000 per day. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
485
Cies are permiEed to levy larger ﬁnes if authorized by another secon of state law or aGer the city has given the violator notice and reasonable time to correct the violation.

Eastvale Municipal Code (“EMC”) § 120.04.150 explicitly prohibits most commercial cannabis acvity in the City, including but not limited to cannabis culvaon, cannabis distribuon, cannabis transportaon, cannabis storage, manufacturing of cannabis products, cannabis processing, the sale of any cannabis or cannabis products for adult-use, and the operation of a cannabis microbusiness.

Assembly Bill 1684 requires that any ordinance pursuant to Assembly Bill 1684 provide for a reasonable amount of me for a person to correct or remedy the violaon before any ﬁnes or penales are imposed if (1) the rental property owner or agent can show the rental or lease agreement prohibits the commercial cannabis acvity (not just the culvaon acvies noted in current law); and (2) the rental property owner or agent did not know the tenant was engaging in unlicensed commercial cannabis acvity for which a license was required and no complaint, property inspecon, or other informaon alerted the rental property owner or agent to the illegal commercial cannabis activity (not just the cultivation activities noted in current law).

The City of Eastvale has been complying with the State law as amended, and the purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the City’s administrave ﬁne structure for unlicensed cannabis acvity to be consistent with current State law requirements.

Environmental
The proposed Ordinance is not a project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As a result, no environmental review efforts are required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
This item brings City code into alignment with state law and does not accomplish any strategic plan priorities.

Fiscal Impact
It is diﬃcult to predict, from year to year, how much ﬁnes the City may collect for cannabis violaons. In calendar year 2023 the City collected $65,090 in ﬁnes related to cannabis grow houses. AB1684 reduces the maximum ﬁnes to $10,000 per day. The City expects there to be a reduction in fines collected as a result of this change.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On January 10, 2024, the City Council approved an amendment to Secon 120.04.150 (Cannabis Facilies, Culvaon, and Deliveries) of the Eastvale municipal code to ensure consistency with Assembly Bill (AB) 1684.

On July 22, 2020, the City Council modiﬁed Secon 120.04.150 (Cannabis Facilies, Culvaon, and Deliveries) of the Eastvale municipal code to classify the violaon of this secon as a misdemeanor (from infraction) and impose up to a $1000.00 fine per offense.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Draft Ordinance Amending Cannabis

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
486
4860-1333-2627 v1
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 120.04.150 (CANNABIS FACILITIES,

CULTIVATION, AND DELIVERIES) TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1684 went into effect January 1, 2024, and made certain amendments to the statute governing the City’s ability to impose administrative fines or penalties on the unlicensed cultivation, manufacturing, processing, distribution, or retail sale of cannabis.

WHEREAS, Eastvale Municipal Code (“EMC”) § 120.04.150 explicitly prohibits most commercial cannabis activity in the City, including but not limited to cannabis cultivation, cannabis distribution, cannabis transportation, cannabis storage, manufacturing of cannabis products, cannabis processing, the sale of any cannabis or cannabis products for adult-use, and the operation of a cannabis microbusiness.

WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1684 limits the fines and penalties that cities may impose on violators of a city’s cannabis regulations at $1,000 per violation and $10,000 per day, but permits cities to levy larger fines if authorized by another section of state law or after the city has given the violator notice and reasonable time to correct the violation.

WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1684 requires that any ordinance pursuant to Assembly Bill 1684 provide for a reasonable amount of time for a person to correct or remedy the violation before any fines or penalties are imposed if (1) the rental property owner or agent can show the rental or lease agreement prohibits the commercial cannabis activity (not just the cultivation activities noted in current law); and (2) the rental property owner or agent did not know the tenant was engaging in unlicensed commercial cannabis activity for which a license was required and no complaint, property inspection, or other information alerted the rental property owner or agent to the illegal commercial cannabis activity (not just the cultivation activities noted in current law).

WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has been complying with the State law as amended, and the purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the City’s administrative fine structure for unlicensed cannabis activity to be consistent with current State law requirements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Amendment of Section 120.04.150. Paragraphs (e) and (f) of Section 120.04.150 (Cannabis facilities, cultivation, and deliveries) of the Eastvale Municipal Code are amended to read as follows:
“(e) Viola?on. Viola?on of any provision of this sec?on is a misdemeanor subject to enforcement remedies and penal?es, including but not limited to those as set forth in Eastvale Municipal Code Chapter 1.01. Any enforcement o ﬃcer may issue an adminis tra?ve cita?on and ﬁne for a 487
4860-1333-2627 v1
viola?on of this sec?on without prior issuance of a No?ce of Viola?on, as provided in Sec?on

8.17.040 of this Code, and the administra?ve ﬁne shall be up to one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per viola?on. For the purposes of subsec?on (d), each cannabis plant present in viola?on of this sec?on is a separate viola?on . The property owner and each owner of the occupant business en?ty engaging in commercial cannabis ac?vity in viola?on of this sec?on shall be joint ly and severally liable for all penal?es and ﬁnes.

Each and every day a viola?on of this sec?on exists shall cons?tute a separate and dis?nct viola?on. Aggregate ﬁnes shall not exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per day if administra?ve ﬁnes are imposed immediately without prior issuance of a No? ce of Viola?on.

If the City imposes ﬁnes immediately, the property owner or their agent shall have 5 days in which to submit evidence to the City of the following: i) a tenant is in possession of the property, ii) the rental or lease agreement with the tenant prohibits commercial cannabis ac?vity , and iii) the property owner or agent did not know the tenant was engaging in illegal commercial cannabis ac?vity and no complaint, property inspec?on, or other informa?on alerted the rental property owner or agent to the illegal commercial cannabis ac?vity.

The City Manager or their designee must determine whether the evidence submi? ed by the property owner or rental agent proves items i, ii, and iii above to be true. If the City Manager or their designee so ﬁnds, the City will suspend the ﬁnes and provide the property owner or their agent with 10 days to remedy the viola?ons before ﬁnes are reinstated.

The remedies and penal?es provided herein are cumula?ve, alterna?ve and nonexclusive. The use of one does not prevent the use of any other criminal, civil, or administra?ve remedy or penalty authorized by law.
(f) Civil penal?es. Any viola?on of this sec?on is declared to be a public nuisance per se and contrary to the public interest and will at the discre?on of the city, be subject to a cause of ac?on for injunc?ve relief. In addi?on to any other method of enforcement, the city a? orney may bring a civil ac?on for injunc?ve relief and civil penal?es against any person or en?ty that violates this sec?on. In any civil ac?on brought pursuant to this sec?on, a court of competent jurisdic?on may award reasonable a? orneys' fees and costs to the prevailing party. The City may refer cases involving unlicensed commercial cannabis ac?vity to the A? orney General to undertake civil enforcement ac?on as authorized by the Government Code.” SECTION 2. Severability. If any chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 488
4860-1333-2627 v1
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.

SECTION 4. City Clerk Action. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and pasting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633(c).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ___________, 2024. __________________________________________
Christian Dinco
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
489
4860-1333-2627 v1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Communications Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 24-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 10 th day of January, 2024, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
490

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.10
January 24, 2024
Adop'on of An Ordinance Adding Sec'ons 10.20.180, 10.20.190,

10.20.200, and 10.32.80 to Chapter 10 of the Eastvale Municipal Code Related to Parking Violations.

Prepared By:

Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance, entled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTIONS 10.20.180 (PARKING WITHIN 18 INCHES OF THE CURB), 10.20.190 (PROHIBITED PARKING IN LOADING ZONES), 10.20.200 (STOPPING IN DESIGNATED FIRE LANE), AND 10.32.80 (ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLE) TO THE

EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE

Background
The City of Eastvale is authorized by Arcle XI, ''Local Government," §5 and §7 of the California State Constuon to exercise the police power of the State by adopng regulaons to promote public health, public safety and general prosperity, and other ordinances and regulaons not in conﬂict 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
491
with general laws. The City of Eastvale has authority pursuant to Secons 21101, "Local Regulaon" and 35700, "Local Authories," of the California Vehicle Code to regulate the stopping, standing, and parking of motor vehicles.

City oﬃcers and depues currently have the authority to issue parking or criminal citaons for California Vehicle Code (CVC) violaons occurring within the city's jurisdicon. However, the city cannot issue administrave ﬁnes for CVC violaons. Depending on the circumstances, oﬃcers and depues (parcularly the newly hired commercial vehicle enforcement deputy) ﬁnd that, at mes, it can be more eﬀecve to issue administrave ﬁnes to eﬀect compliance. Codifying CVC violaons into the Eastvale Municipal Code provides Sheriﬀ's Depues and Community Enhancement and Safety Oﬃcers with an addional tool to gain compliance. The California Vehicle Code secons proposed as city ordinances are as follows:

22502(a) CVC as EMC 10.20.180 No parking within 18 inches of the curb 22500(i) CVC as EMC 10.20.190 Prohibited parking in loading zones 22523(b) CVC as EMC 10.32.80 Abandonment of vehicle
22500.1 CVC as EMC 10.20.200 Stopping in a designated fire lane Environmental
The proposed Ordinance is not a project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As a result, no environmental review efforts are required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
This item brings City code into alignment with state law and does not accomplish any strategic plan priorities.

Fiscal Impact
Issuance of administrave ﬁnes for the newly adopted ordinances will likely result in increased revenue. The City Council authorized a new commercial enforcement deputy in the current ﬁscal year. It is not yet possible to determine the potenal revenue from this program with accuracy. It is not the intent of this program to increase revenue for the City, but rather, to increase public safety through compliance with existing State vehicle codes.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On January 10, 2024, the City Council introduced an ordinance adding secons 10.20.180 (Parking Within 18 Inches of the Curb), 10.20.190 (Prohibited Parking in Loading Zones), 10.20.200 (Stopping in Designated Fire Lane), and 10.32.80 (Abandonment of Vehicle) to the Eastvale Municipal Code.

On June 28, 2023 City Council approved a commercial vehicle enforcement deputy and the purchase of a commercial enforcement vehicle.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Draft Ordinance.docx

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
492
4873-1240-7177 v2
ORDINANCE NO. 2024-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTIONS 10.20.180 (PARKING WITHIN 18 INCHES OF THE CURB), 10.20.190 (PROHIBITED PARKING IN LOADING ZONES),

10.20.200 (STOPPING IN DESIGNATED FIRE LANE), AND 10.32.80 (ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLE) TO THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale is authorized by Article XI, ''Local Government," §5 and §7 of the California State Constitution to exercise the police power of the State by adopting regulations to promote public health, public safety and general prosperity, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has authority pursuant to Sections 21101, "Local Regulation" and 35700, "Local Authorities," of the California Vehicle Code to regulate the stopping, standing, and parking of motor vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update its Municipal Code provisions to enforce State Vehicle Code provisions on the stopping, standing, and parking of motor vehicles.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Addition of Section 10.20.180. Section 10.20.180 (Parking within 18 inches of the Curb) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

A vehicle stopped or parked upon a roadway with adjacent curbs or class IV bikeways, as defined in Section 890.4 of the Streets and Highways Code, shall be stopped or parked with the right-hand wheels of the vehicle parallel to, and within 18 inches of, the right-hand curb or the right-hand edge of the class IV bikeway, except that a motorcycle shall be parked with at least one wheel or fender touching the right-hand curb or edge. If no curbs, barriers, or class IV bikeways bound a two-way roadway, right-hand parallel parking is required unless otherwise indicated.

This section does not apply to commercial vehicles which, pursuant to Vehicle Code § 22502, subd. (b)(1) that cannot abide by these restrictions in loading or unloading merchandise or passengers.

SECTION 2. Addition of Section 10.20.190. Section 10.20.190 (Prohibited Parking in Loading Zones) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

A person shall not stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or official traffic control device, except as provided under Vehicle 493
4873-1240-7177 v2
Code § 22500.5, alongside curb space authorized for the loading and unloading of passengers of a bus engaged as a common carrier in local transportation when indicated by a sign or red paint on the curb erected or painted by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance.

SECTION 3. Addition of Section 10.20.200. Section 10.20.200 (Stopping in Designated Fire Lane) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

No person shall stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle, whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or official traffic control device along the edge of any highway, at any curb, or in any location in a publicly or privately owned or operated off-street parking facility, designated as a fire lane by the fire department or fire district with jurisdiction over the area in which the place is located.

The designation shall be indicated (1) by a sign posted immediately adjacent to, and visible from, the designated place clearly stating in letters not less than one inch in height that the place is a fire lane, (2) by outlining or painting the place in red and, in contrasting color, marking the place with the words “FIRE LANE,” which are clearly visible from a vehicle, or (3) by a red curb or red paint on the edge of the roadway upon which is clearly marked the words “FIRE LANE.”
SECTION 4. Addition of Section 10.20.210. Section 10.20.210 (Abandonment of Vehicle) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is added to read as follows:
(a) No person shall abandon a vehicle upon any highway. (b) No person shall abandon a vehicle upon public or private property without the express or implied consent of the owner or person in lawful possession or control of the property. (c) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) and shall provide proof that the costs of removal and disposition of the vehicle have been paid. No part of any fine imposed shall be suspended. The fine may be paid in installments if the court determines that the defendant is unable to pay the entire amount in one payment.
(d) Proof that the costs of removal and disposition of the vehicle have been paid shall not be required if proof is provided to the court that the vehicle was stolen prior to abandonment.

That proof may consist of a police report or other evidence acceptable to the court. (e) The costs required to be paid for the removal and disposition of any vehicle determined to be abandoned pursuant to Section 22669 shall not exceed those for towing and seven days of storage. This subdivision does not apply if the registered owner or legal owner has completed and returned to the lienholder a “Declaration of Opposition” form within the time specified in Section 22851.8.
494
4873-1240-7177 v2
(f)(1) If a vehicle is abandoned in violation of subdivision (b) and is not redeemed after impound, the last registered owner is guilty of an infraction. In addition to any other penalty, the registered owner shall be liable for any deficiency remaining after disposal of the vehicle under Section 3071 or 3072 of the Civil Code or Section 22851.10 of this code. (2) The filing of a report of sale or transfer of the vehicle pursuant to Section 5602, the filing of a vehicle theft report with a law enforcement agency, or the filing of a form or notice with the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 4456 or Section 5900 or 5901 relieves the registered owner of liability under this subdivision.

SECTION 5. Renumbering of Chapter 10.20. Chapter 10.20 (Parking) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is renumbered such that Section 10.20.180 (Violation; penalty) is now Section

10.20.220 and Section 10.20.190 (Legal procedures and penalties) is now Section 10.20.230.

SECTION 6. CEQA Findings. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The ordinance, which imposes parking regulations and updates the City’s bail schedule, is not subject to CEQA review because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) provides that a project is exempt from CEQA if the activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 7. Severability. If any chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.

SECTION 9. City Clerk Action. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and pasting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633(c). 495
4873-1240-7177 v2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ___________, 2024. __________________________________________
Christian Dinco
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Communications Director
496
4873-1240-7177 v2

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Communications Director
497

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.11
January 24, 2024
Professional Services Agreement with Englekirk for the Structural Peer Review of City Hall, Library, and Police Station
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to execute a contract with Englekirk for an amount of $48,000 plus 10% con+ngency for a not to exceed amount of $52,800, to provide
structural peer review service of
City Hall, Library, and Police Station.

Summary
On August 26, 2022, Phase I of the Downtown Eastvale project, formerly known as the Leal Project, closed escrow and is now owned oﬃcially by The New Home Company. Phase I of Downtown Eastvale includes a new City Hall, library, police sta+on, arts and cultural spaces, and an amphitheater on approximately 16 acres. The area also includes 495,000 square feet of retail and commercial space, parks, and up to 802 homes. The remainder of the project will be constructed in subsequent phases.

On May 10, 2023, a contract amendment with Gensler was approved for architectural, engineering, and interior design services for Phase 1 of the Eastvale Civic Center Project. As approved, Gensler's scope includes providing full architectural and deign services for construc+on for all phases of the project to completion.

Background
Downtown Eastvale is the single most impac>ul development program in the City's history, and the complexity and size of the project are not something that the City has experienced previously. In order to successfully deliver quality project, it is important to get an expert opinion on some of the 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
498
major design elements such as structural and mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP). This process is known as a peer review, and it is an independent evalua+on of project design that is performed by professionals within the same design discipline. Peer review is done from the lens of safety, design eﬃciency, and constructability. This is something that is not captured or accomplished through code compliance "plan check". This service is highly recommended to ensure the highest quality of engineering service, constructability, and construction and material cost control.

Englekirk Structural Engineers (Englekirk) was selected to provide the structural peer review service of the three newly constructed buildings: City Hall, Library, and Police Sta+on. Since founded in 1969, Englekirk has been one of the top industry leaders providing consul+ng structural engineering design services for projects both in private and public sectors which include K-12 and Higher Educa+on, Historic Preserva+on, Healthcare, Jus+ce, Police / Fire/ EOC, Libraries, Museums and Wind Engineering. The work scope includes performing a qualita+ve review of the structural plans and providing feedback regarding the quality of proposed engineered design and cost-eﬀec+veness of the proposed structural design.

Environmental
The proposed professional services agreement with Englekirk is not considered a project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No further environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 1
| Target #: 2
| Goal #: 1
The proposed contract contribute to the development of Downtown Eastvale, which can signiﬁcantly aJract businesses and retailers to establish their presence in the City and create “Destination Eastvale” with high-quality and unique businesses.

Fiscal Impact
Total ﬁscal impact for this item is $52,800. Adequate budget is available under Capital Improvement Plan Project No. 95011 for the Civic Center in the General Capital Projects Fund (account 600-500- 6650).

Prior City Council/Commission Action
This is the first contract with this vendor and there is no prior Commission or City Council action.

Attachment(s)
AJachment 1 - Service Agreement (currently being reviewed for comment and execu+on by Englekirk)

Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to PSA

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
499
- 1 -

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES

STRUCTURAL PEER REVIEW SERVICES

FOR EASTVALE CIVIC CENTER WITH ENGLEKIRK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this ____ day of _________, 2024 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Englekirk Structural Engineers (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as “Party” and hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by direct negotiation the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.

B. Contractor, following submission of a proposal for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 "Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement commences on the date first ascribed above and terminates upon completion of the Eastvale Civic Center project.

SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Services” (hereinafter, the “Services”) and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.

SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.
500
- 2 -
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit “A” “Compensation” and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Fifty Two Thousand Eight Hundred dollars ($52,800), unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of this Agreement. (b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection (a) and Exhibit “A” include payment of labor on an hourly basis (as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection (c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
(c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt of Contractor’s correct and undisputed invoice. (d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.

SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.

City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor’s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor’s work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor’s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City’s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor’s work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 “Indemnification” and Section 17 “Insurance.”
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this 501
- 3 -
Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.

If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor’s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 “Standard of Performance” of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.

All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors’ work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.

SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
(a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to the Services, including expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three (3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
(b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed 502
- 4 -
upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
(c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors-in-interest and authorized representatives.

SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
(a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise.
(b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s personnel.

Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor’s personnel are in any manner officials, officers, or employees of City. (c) Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor’s personnel shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, may have to any such rights. Contractor’s indemnity obligations in Section 16 “Indemnification” of this Agreement include the obligation to indemnify the City from and against any liability that may arise related to claims that Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are entitled to retirement, health care or any other benefits that accrue to City employees. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.

Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit “A” “Scope of Work” that shall also be applicable to Contractor’s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general. 503
- 5 -
SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.

SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, “construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.

SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.

Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.

SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.

Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor 504
- 6 -
agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. (c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non- related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. (a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
(b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
(c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct.

Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a 505
- 7 -
Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.

SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. (b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor.
(c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
(d) City’s Negligence. The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.
506
- 8 -
SECTION 17. INSURANCE.

Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit “B” “Insurance” and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.

SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.

The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor’s duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.

Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” City acknowledges, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.

SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.

Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.

SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
(a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. (b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination to City.
(c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. (d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor’s possession shall be returned to City.

Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” 507
- 9 -
of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 “Compensation and Method of Payment” of this Agreement.

SECTION 21. DEFAULT.

In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 “Termination of Agreement.” Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.

Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.

SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.

All public information, data, reports, records, and maps as are existing and available to City as public records, and which are necessary for carrying out the Services shall be furnished to Contractor in every reasonable way to facilitate, without undue delay, the Services to be performed under this Agreement.

SECTION 24. NOTICES.

All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: Public Works Director
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
508
- 10 -
To Contractor: Englekirk Structural Engineers
Attn: Saurabh Prasad, PE, SE
888 S. Figueroa Street, 18th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three (3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.

SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.

SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.

This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 “Amendment” and the City Manager’s contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.

SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if it does not exceed the amount that may be approved administratively pursuant to the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. The City’s City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City’s rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.

SECTION 29. WAIVER.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a 509
- 11 -
waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.

In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits "A" through "B", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.

SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.

If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).

SECTION 34. CONFLICTING TERMS.

Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
510
- 12 -

CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Mark Orme
City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney

ENGLEKIRK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
____
________________
________________
511
A-1
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES AND COMPENSATION
512
A-1
EXHIBIT "B"

INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.

Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:

1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). (2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 "any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. (3) Workers’ Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (4) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three (3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three (3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.

2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability. $1,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (2) Automobile. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of 513
A-2
not less than $2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
(3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. (4) Professional Liability. $1,000,000 per occurrence.

B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:

1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. (1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. (2) Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor’s insurance. (3) Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

3. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation 514
A-3
against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.

C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit “C”. The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.

2. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.

3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor’s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
515

Opp No.: 202316480
January 3, 2024

via email [email protected]

Mr. Jimmy Chung, PE
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, California 91752

Regarding: Structural Engineering Fee Proposal
Eastvale Civic Center – Structural Peer Review
Eastvale, California

Dear Mr. Chung:

Englekirk Structural Engineers is pleased to present this fee proposal for structural engineering services for the above-mentioned project. The work scope as we understand it is to perform a qualitative review of the structural plans for the subject property and provide feedback regardi ng the cost -effectiveness of the proposed structural design.

Based upon the Basis of Design documents, the project to our understanding includes the new Eastvale Civic Center Phase 1 which includes the following buildings:
▪ City Hall, 3 stories, 52,000 sf with bridge connection to the Library on the 2nd floor ▪ Riverside Branch Library, 2 stories, 25,000 sf
▪ Police Station, 2 stories, 24,000 sf
▪ City Park with Amphitheater, 2.8 acres

Our work scope will be limited to a review of the structural plans and a review of the structural calculations as described below for all buildings. We will review these documents with the focus on determining if there are any cost-effective solutions or alternatives that should be considered for the current design.

At 100% DD Phase:

1. Review structural design development drawings and structural basis of design/narrative.

2. Provide comments on selected analysis procedure, seismic design methodologies and modeling approach for the structures as described in Basis of Design.

3. Provide comments to EOR on the structural drawings with primary focus on:
a. Identify any critical design items/details/sections at this stage to EOR that should be verified/included in CD drawings and calculations.

4. Provide comments to the basis of design/structural narrative and structural drawings through Bluebeam Studio Session.

5. Prepare for and participate in a conference call to discuss the comments and EOR response.

888 S. Figueroa Street
18th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 9001 7

323.733.6673 T

www.englekirk.com

Los Angeles
Orange County
Honolulu

516
Mr. Jimmy Chung, PE
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Eastvale
Re: City of Eastvale Peer Review
January 3, 2024

Page 2 of 3 ends

At 90% CD Phase:

1. Review 90% CD structural drawings and Calculations:
a. Review analysis procedure, and mathematical modeling of the building for general conformance to the code requirement, including compliance for essential facilities (Police Station). b. Review linear analysis results including reactions, drift demands, demands on structural elements (beams, columns, foundations etc.), deformation compatibility for the gravity force resisting system.
c. Review structural framing plans and details for consistency with analytical results presented in linear analysis and calculations.
d. Identify any structural components that need additional structural verification/details. e. Review drawings for completeness to streamline construction and avoid potential change orders. f. Review drawings/details for any constructability issues.

2. Verify comments provided in 100% DD review are incorporated in drawings/calculations.

3. Provide comments to the structural drawings and calculations through Bluebeam Studio Session.

4. Prepare for and participate in a conference call to discuss the comments and EOR response.

5. Prepare final peer review letter stating that the peer review has been completed.

We will prepare a letter summarizing our findings. We will allow up to 4 meetings with you and your engineer to discuss our findings. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss our findings with the Engineer of Record and discuss whether they can be effectively implemented into the current structural design. Also, it can be discussed if structural alternatives can be formulated for cost-saving considerations.

We have assumed that we will be provided a half size set of plans and complete set of calculations for our review.

PROPOSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FEE
For providing this work, we propose a lump sum fee of $48,000.

We estimate that if authorized to begin this review, we will take approximately 3 weeks to mobilize, review the structural plans, and prepare the summary letter with our findings and structural recommendations.

517
Mr. Jimmy Chung, PE
Public Works Director / City Engineer
City of Eastvale
Re: City of Eastvale Peer Review
January 3, 2024

Page 3 of 3 ends

It is understood and agreed that this study is undertaken to review the cost effectiveness of the proposed structural system and that Englekirk Structural Engineers is not responsible or liable for the accuracy or adequacy of a structural design performed by others. Responsibility for drawings, specifications and as -built conditions rest solely with the owner, the Engineer of Record, and the owner's other design professionals.

Accordingly, the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold Englekirk Structural Engineers harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, demands, losses, damages, and costs, including but not limited to costs of defense, arising out of or in any way connected with this project excepting only those losses arising out of the sole negligence of Englekirk Structural Engineers.

We hope you find this fee proposal clear. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

Saurabh Prasad, PE, SE
Project Director

SP:nk

cc: Vladimir Volnyy / Englekirk
518

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.12
January 24, 2024
Approval of a Change Order for: Task Order No. 13 for the Leal Plan Check Reviews; and, new Task Order No. 15 for the Walmart Plan Check Reviews by CSG Consultants
Prepared By:

Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Approve a change to Task Order no. 13 for the On-call Contract with CSG Consultants, Inc. for the plan check reviews of the Leal development project in the amount of $70,000; and 2 .

Approve a Task Order no. 15 for the On-call Contract with CSG Consultants, Inc. for the plan check reviews of the Walmart development project in the amount of $28,692; and 3 .

Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

Summary
The Public Works Department is commi7ed to the maintenance and opera8on of the City's infrastructure. This includes ensuring the safety and quality of streets, sidewalks, traﬃc signals, street lights, traﬃc signs, and storm drain inlets proposed by Developers. Therefore, obtaining plan check services from the proper engineers is integral to ensuring compliance of the City's code and design standards.

CSG Consultants, Inc. has been chosen from the on-call list to complete the plan check reviews for the Leal and Walmart development projects due to their exper8se and knowledge with development projects. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
519
Background
On January 12, 2022, the City Council awarded a Professional On-call Services contract to CSG Consultants, Inc. (CSG) for Private Land Development Plan Check Services. On July 27, 2022, City Council authorized the City Manager to approve task orders for the On-call Contracts for Engineering Professional Services in an amount that, in the aggregate, does not exceed $2,000,000 per ﬁscal year across all disciplines. The following task orders and amount of the Purchase Orders (PO) have been issued to CSG so far for FY23-24:

PO Amount
Task Order No.

Services
$407.00
1 Goodman Estates
Not used
2 Not used
3 $5,080.00
4 Olive Garden
Not used
5 $3,960.00
6 Goodman
$1,567.00
7 Rivian
$11,776.25
8 Dunkin Donuts
Not used
9 $2,866.25
10 American Car Wash
$1,210.00
11 Homestead SI
$1,083.75
12 Homestead TCP
$40,605
13 Leal
–
Change Order to add an additional $70,000,
grand total $110,605
$11,690
14 St. Oscar Romero Church
$28,692
15 Walmart
–
Needs Approval

An additional amount is being requested for:

Original PO
Amount
Task No.

Additional Task Order
Amount
Grand Total
Services
$40,605
13 $70,000
$110,605
Leal

The new PO amount being requested for the Walmart development project is:

PO Amount
Task No.

Services
$28,692
15 Walmart

Environmental
The proposed task orders are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act as they are not 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
520
projects.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: B
| Goal #: C
Developing Branding and Identity for Eastvale
Fiscal Impact
There are suﬃcient funds budgeted in the current ﬁscal year 2023-24 in General Fund Account 100- 320-6433 for Private Development.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On January 12, 2022, City Council awarded an On-Call Engineering and Professional Consul8ng Services to CSG.

On July 27, 2022, City Council approved a not to exceed amount of $2,000,000 per ﬁscal year On-Call Professional Engineering Services.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - PSA with CSG Consultants, Inc..pdf

Attachment_2.2 Task_Order No. 15 (Add Services).pdf

Attachment_2.1_Task_Order No. 13 (Add Services).pdf

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
521

AGREEMENT FOR ON - CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PRIVATE LAND DEVELOPMENT — PLAN CHECK SERVICES]
This Agreement for On -Call Professional Services ("Agreement') is entered into as of this day of V( omY 2021 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (" City') and CSG Consultants, Inc. (" Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by request for proposals the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.

B. Contractor, following submission of its proposals for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to be eligible to perform those services as needed and requested by the City.

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement' of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for three years commencing on the date first ascribed above. City may extend the Term of this Agreement two times for one year each time, for a total potential term of five years.

SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES & SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE. a) Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to perform Private Land Development — Plan Check services ( hereinafter, the " Services") as requested and authorized by the City. The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. When the City desires to utilize Contractor for Services, the City will issue a Task Order that includes a Scope of Services to be performed and the compensation to be paid for the Services within the Task Order.

Each Task Order shall be attached to this Agreement as part of Exhibit " A" ( e.g., the first Task Order will be Exhibit " A- 1", the second Exhibit " A- 2," etc.). Each Task Order is made a part of this Agreement by this reference.
1 -
522
b) Schedule of Performance. The Services authorized by each Task Order shall be completed pursuant to the schedule stated in the Task Order. Should the Services not be completed pursuant to that schedule, the Contractor shall be deemed to be in Default of this Agreement. The City, in its sole discretion, may choose not to enforce the Default provisions of this Agreement and may instead allow Contractor to continue performing the Services.

SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered that are in addition to or outside of the Services authorized by a Task Order unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 " Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.

SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
a) The City has or will enter into a maximum of five ( 5) non- exclusive contracts for performance of the Scope of Services identified in Exhibit A, including this Agreement (" On - Call Contracts"). The total aggregate amount payable by the City pursuant to the On -Call Contracts shall not exceed a cumulative maximum total value of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) per fiscal year ("NTE Sum"). Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in each Task Order for the Services identified in the Task Order. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve Task Orders for Services that do not exceed the City Manager's then -current signing authority for purchases of professional services as set forth in Section 4.06. 050, as that section may be amended from time to time. All other Task Orders shall be approved by the City Council prior to the commencement of the Services. It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied that this dollar amount will be authorized under the On -Call Contracts through Task Orders. Each time a Task Order is awarded under any of the On -Call Contracts, the City will send written notification to Contractor and each of the other consultants entering into the On -Call Contracts. The notice will identify the total funds allocated under issued Task Orders, and the remaining unencumbered amount of the NTE Sum. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the City will not pay any amount under this Agreement that would exceed the NTE Sum, and Contractor shall not enter into a Task Order that exceeds the NTE Sum.
b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor ( by sub -category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection ( a) and the applicable Task Order include payment of labor on an hourly basis ( as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall 2-
523
independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection ( c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission.
c) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of Contractor' s correct and undisputed invoice.
d) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor.

SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.

City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor' s work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor's work within sixty (60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor' s work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City' s acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud.

Acceptance of any of Contractor's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 Indemnification" and Section 17 " Insurance."
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files and other documents.

If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor' s guarantees and warranties in Section 9 " Standard of Performance" of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.

All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be 3-
524
used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors' work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.

SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR' S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor' s performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to work, services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement.

Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three ( 3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546. 7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars ($ 10, 000. 00), this Agreement and the Contractor' s books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three ( 3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor' s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement. c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors - in -interest and authorized representatives.

SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, nor to incurany obligation, debtor liabilityof any kindon behalfof or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. 4-
525
b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor' s exclusive direction and control.

Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City.
c) Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor' s officers, employees, agents or subcontractors shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, may have to any such rights. Contractor' s indemnity obligations in Section 16 " Indemnification" of this Agreement include the obligation to indemnify the City from and against any liability that may arise related to claims that Contractor, or its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are entitled to retirement, health care or any other benefits that accrue to City employees. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.

Contractor represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Task Orders attached hereto in Exhibit " A" that shall also be applicable to Contractor' s work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.

SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.

Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.
5-
526
SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
It is the understanding of City and Contractor that California prevailing wage laws do not apply to this Agreement because the Agreement does not involve any of the following services subject to prevailing wage rates pursuant to the California Labor Code or regulations promulgated thereunder: Construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work performed on public buildings, facilities, streets or sewers done under contract and paid for in whole or in part out of public funds. In this context, construction" includes work performed during the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited to, inspection and land surveying work.

SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.

SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.

Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et sea., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein.

Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor's performance of the Services. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.
b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non -related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. sm
527
c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmentalagencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a) All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law.
b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
c) if Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor' s conduct.

Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.

SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION.
a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professionalstandardof carefor Contractor's services, to the fullestextentpermittedby 7-
528
law, Contractorshallindemnify, protect, defendand hold harmlessCity and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (" Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor. c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section. d) City' s Negligence. The provisions of this section do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from gross negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents.

SECTION 17. INSURANCE.

Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit " B" " Insurance" and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.

WE
529
SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.

The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor's duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.

Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 "Termination of Agreement." City acknowledges, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors.

SECTION 19. CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.

Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor' s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor' s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance.

SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty ( 30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty 30) days written notice of termination to City.
c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor's possession shall be returned to City. Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 "Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 " Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement.

SECTION 21. DEFAULT.

In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in WE
530
which Contractor may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 " Termination of Agreement." Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City' s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.

SECTION 23. COOPERATION BY CITY.

SECTION 24. NOTICES.

To City: City of Eastvale
Attn: City Manager
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
To Contractor. CSG Consultants, Inc.

Attn: Cyrus Kianpour, President
550 Pilgrim Drive
Foster City, CA 94404
email: Contracts@csgengr. com
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three ( 3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.
10-
531
SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.

This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 " Amendment" and the City Manager's contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code.

SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if the total compensation under this Agreement, as amended, would not exceed the City Manager' s contracting authority under Section 4.06.050 of the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. The City's City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizesthe City Managerto execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City's rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.

SECTION 29. WAIVER.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisionsof this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the 11 -
532
laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U. S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.

SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits " A" ( including all subparts of Exhibit " A") and " B", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.

SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.

SECTION 34. NONEXCLUSIVITY.

This Agreement shall not preclude the City from contracting with other persons for work that could be performed by Contractor under this Agreement or utilizing City employees to perform such work.

SECTION 35. CONFLICTING TERMS.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first -above written.

CITY OF EASTVALE
12-
533
ATTEST:

APPROVED AS TO FORM
c —t2 da
Erica Vega
City Attomey
By:

Nar
Its:

NOTE: CONTRACTOR' S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE

REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR

OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTOR' S BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS

MUST SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL

SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.
13-
534
1 1
r
i . .
fir
r_
l ` I -
Lr/
JJ - ' Vj/
J
t'..f t ,
1f_
M l . j ,
o _ -
r _ _

1. ._
535
EXHIBIT " A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES & COMPENSATION
TASK ORDERS TO BE INSERTED HERE ONCE APPROVED. EACH TASK ORDER

MUST CONTAIN A SPECIFIC SCOPE OF SERVICE AND COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR THOSE SERVICES.]
tngfneelring; publicworks, andplanriing'servicesare'curiently billed'ona time-arid-materials'basis accordingto our ratesshownbelow: Overtimeratewill be 1:5 x the hourlyrateof the personnel providingservice. Oneachanniversaryof the contractstart date, CSGwill initiatea rateincreasebased on changein CPIfor the applicableregion. CSGwill mailan invoiceat the beginningof everymonthfor servicesrenderedduringthepreviousmonth. ' ' ' • ' ' ' ' . ' Administration / Document Control 100
Assistant Engineer 130
Associate Engineer 140
Senior Engineer 155
City/PrincipalEngineer . . . . . . . . f170
TrafficEngineeringji1WEngineering,'inc.) 150
GeoteclinicalSeivices (Geo-Advantec; Inc) . . ' ' ' . ' 155 Planning Te4hnl; ian .

Assistant Planner . -. . . '
105
Associate Planner 14d
Senior Olanner ' -' -'_ _ '-- ISd
Principal Planner . 170
PlanningManager ' 5185
Planningoifectdr ' 200
A- 1
536
EXHIBIT " B"

Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:

1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 0001). 2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 ( Ed. 1187) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 " any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. 3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. 4) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor' s profession. This coverage may be written on a " claims made" basis, and must include coverage for contractual liability. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three ( 3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor' s services or the termination of this Agreement.

During this additional three ( 3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.

2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
1) Commercial General Liability. $ 1, 000, 000 general
aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 2) Automobile. $ 1,000, 000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of C- l
537
not less than $ 2, 000, 000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as
required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $ 1,000, 000 per occurrence.
4) Professional Liability. $ 1,000, 000 per occurrence.

B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:

2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. 1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. 2) Contractor' s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor' s insurance. 3) Contractor' s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer' s liability.
4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

3. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation C- 2
538
against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor.

C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit " B". The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor identical to those Contractor provides.

2. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.

3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor' s liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.

C- 3
539

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California
County of San Mateo )
On December 16, 2021 before me, Kathy Lau, Notary Public insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared Cyrus Kianpour
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person* whose name( s) is/ efe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged tome that he/sheAhey executed the same in his/ iie e authorized capacityo*, and that by hisiheNAheiFsignatures) on the instrument the person(s3, or the entity upon behalf of which the person* acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal. r*A=-
KATHY L uu
NotaryPublic - California
SanMato county
Cotnnfton 0 2354084
MyComm. ExpiresMay7, 2025
Signatur ( Seal)
540
A- - A
t) Aj A AX
molah", - 3illurs V wlr&
17M.-P) til) AA rb•
541
O
ctober 16th, 2023
Mr. Gabriel Mayorquin
Assistant Engineer

CITY OF EASTVALE
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Subject: PW23-10004 Walmart Precise Grade and Improvement Plan – Estimate of Fees for Plan Review Dear Mr. Mayorquin,
Pursuant to your request, CSG Consultants, Inc. is pleased to provide this Estimate of Fees for review of plans and documents.

The services are based on information received from you via email dated 10/12/2023. The fees are based on our current contract rates for plan check and administrative services. Fees assume 100% completion and approval upon 3rd review. If additional plan check is required, the review would be billed at our hourly rate on a time and material basis.

The proposed scope of work and associated fees are:

1. Review Street Improvement Plans (44 hours) $ 7,340

2. Review Precise Grading Plans (128 hours) $ 21,280
T
OTAL $ 28,620
If you have any questions or would like to discuss this estimate further, please call me on my cell phone anytime, or call Vernon Tabirara at (714) 568-1010.

If this estimate meets your approval, please provide us with the necessary Notice-to-Proceed documentation.

Sincerely,
Peykan Abbassi, P.E
(818) 800-6326, [email protected]
3707 W Garden Grove Blvd. Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868
phone 714.568.1010 fax 714.568.1028 w ww.csgengr.com 542

3707 W Garden Grove Blvd. Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868
phone 714.568.1010 fax 714.568.1028 www.csgengr.com

December 4, 2023

Brian Sandona
Principal Engineer

CITY OF EASTVALE
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752

Subject: Request for Additional Authorization – Land Development Plan Review Services

Dear Mr. Sandona,

CSG Consultants, Inc. respectfully requests authorization for additional fees for Land Development Plan Review Services for Eastwalk (PW22-10004) in the City of Eastvale.

We are requesting an additional amount of $70,000. Our services and fees would be invoiced on a Time and Material basis for tasks as they are assigned by the City. Accurate expenditure timeline cannot be defined due to the unknown schedule and development plans of the private developer. Based on review of recent budgetary figures, the average burn rate has been approximately $7000 per month for the period between July ’23 and end of November ’23. An additional $70,000 will allow us to complete review and approval of the ongoing Planning Areas 1, 6, 7 and 8 projects. It will also cover the cost of review and approval of the forthcoming assignments of Planning Areas 3 and 4.

If this request meets your approval, please provide the necessary Notice-to-Proceed document.

Should you have any questions or would like to discuss this request further, please call me at (714) 568-1010 or email me at [email protected]. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Peykan Abbassi, PE
VP, Engineering-So Cal
543

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.13
January 24, 2024
Interim Financial Report - Fiscal Year 2023-24, Quarter 1 Prepared By:

Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council Receive and ﬁle the Interim Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2023-24, Quarter 1 ending September 30, 2023.

Summary
The goal of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Opera-ng and Capital Improvement Budget served to establish both long-term and short-term ﬁnancial planning for the City while adhering to regula-ons set by the Governmental Accoun-ng Standards Board (GASB). The comprehensive budget illustrates City Council’s commitment to providing cost eﬀec-ve municipal services. City Council adopts an opera-ng and capital improvement budget every year, which commits resources for the accomplishment of the City’s Strategic Plan, policies, and execu-on of services to the public. The budget report iden-ﬁes target areas while measuring achievements to ensure departments remain transparent and on track. An abundant amount of -me, analysis, and data from various resources helps establish projec-ons to forecast proper revenue and expenditure budgets. The budget is a dynamic document that is amended throughout the year for various reasons, including City Council ac-ons on department requests, ac-ons by third par-es which impact the budget plan, or changes in the economy.

The Quarterly Interim Financial Report is intended to serve as an update to Council on the City's revenue and expenditure performance with respect to budget. This par-cular Interim Financial Report is for the ﬁrst quarter (1) of ﬁscal year 2023-24 ending September 30, 2023. The ﬁgures in the a:ached reports represent the unaudited ﬁnancials for quarter 1 as of January 16, 2024. It is important to note that the ﬁgures contained within the report do not reﬂect audited ﬁnancials for 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
544
the current ﬁscal year, and ﬁgures may be adjusted in accordance with audit standards. The General Fund is expected to complete the ﬁscal year with a $20.3 million budget surplus and a total of $147.7 million in available fund balance, of which $140.3 million is assigned or commi:ed for future use.

Background
Detail regarding the Interim Financial Report can be found in attachment 1, Interim Financial Report.

Environmental
Government ﬁscal ac-vi-es and budget appropria-ons are not considered a Project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: 3
| Goal #: 6
Ensure that City revenues align with expenditures.

Fiscal Impact
The interim report for Quarter four of ﬁscal year 2022-23 does not cause a ﬁscal impact to the city.

No action regarding revenue or expenditure budget is requested of the City Council at this time.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
In prepara-on for the adop-on of the Fiscal-Year 2023-24 Annual Opera-ng Budget staﬀ followed the budget -meline as presented at the December 14, 2022 council mee-ng. The City Council held a Strategic planning Workshop and Priori-es Update on February 9, 2023. City Council was also presented with a budget goal seGng session and workshop conducted on April 26, 2023. On June 14, 2023 the draH budget was presented to Council as a budget study session, no changes were made to the proposed budget. On June 28, 2023 the City Council unanimously adopted the budget.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Interim Financial Report - FY 2023-24 Quarter 1

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
545

CITY OF

EASTVALE

CALIFORNIA

INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
QUARTER ONE | 3 MONTHS
FISCAL YEAR 2023 - 2024
546
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 2

REPORT OVERVIEW
On June 28, 2023, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2023-24 budget. The interim ﬁnancial report is prepared by the Finance Department and contains informa�on related to the ﬁscal year 2023-24 budget and actual ac�vity for revenues and expenditures for the 3-month period ending September 30, 2023. The ﬁgures contained in this report are unaudited for ﬁscal year 2022-23 and 2023-24.

QUARTER 1 HIGHLIGHTS: Key changes impacting the city during the first quarter of fiscal year 2023-24 Prior Fiscal Year Notes: The city ended the prior ﬁscal year with a budget surplus of $31.3 million. The surplus is due to several factors . The overwhelming majority of the surplus is due to a n increase in the city’s sales tax receipts.

Addi�onally, the City experienced savings in its largest department s in the General Fund, General Government, Community Development, and Public Works. These departments had budget surpluses due to vacancies and capital improvement plan savings.

First Quarter Notes: The ﬁrst quarter of the ﬁscal year provides the least amount of data on budget performance, as less than 3 months of expenditure data is contained in the report. The city pays invoices within a 45-60 day window, meaning many payments for August and September have not been processed by September 30th. Addi�onally, most revenues are received a�er the start of the calendar year. As a result, the ﬁrst quarter report includes limited data on both revenue and expenditure budget performance.

Fund Balance: The city is projected to complete the year with $147.7 million in fund balance in the General Fund. A litle over $15.3 million is set aside as an assigned emergency reserve for opera�ons. Addi�onal assigned reserves include $29.5 to cover capital improvement project grants and $219,066 to cover special revenue fund nega�ve fund balances. A total of $9.5 million has been commited by the City Council for the Civic Center project and other capital reserves. The remaining $7.7 million of unassigned fund balance is available for emergency projects and situa�ons or can be assigned by City Council to new projects or the Civic Center project. The Fire Fund is projected to ﬁnish the ﬁscal year with $16.7 million in fund balance. An assigned emergency reserve of $5.9 million is set aside for opera�ons, and an addi�onal $2.0 million is assigned for the future third ﬁre sta�on. A n addi�onal $8.0 million was commited by the City Council for the future third ﬁre sta�on, and $400,000 is commited as an equipment replacement reserve.

This leaves $366,164 of unassigned fund balance.

Sales Tax Monitoring: The Finance department con�nues to monitor revenues closely, par�cularly sales tax. A true- up payment applicable to quarter two ending December 31, 2020, has not yet been received. HdL originally believed the true up would be received in the 2021-22 ﬁscal year, however the State has s�ll not reallocated the payment. The true-up is es�mated at $8.0 million. More detail regarding sales tax is available in the atachments “General Fund Opera�ng Summary” and “Sales Tax Quarterly Summary.”
Appropria�ons Limit: A summary report , “Appropria�ons Limit Summary ,” is included in this report . The city exceeded the state mandated Appropria�ons Limit for ﬁscal year 2020 -21, 2021-22, 2022-23, and 2023-24. The summary report details the city’s limit and revenues subject to appropria�ons and provides trend data for the last seven ﬁscal years. The city will con�nue to address the appropria�ons limit implica�ons during the budget and mid- year processes. The City Council commited funds that exceeded the limit towards capital outlay.

This report does not include projections and only focuses on the City’s performance in comparison to budgeted estimates.

Attached Detail Reports

General Fund Summary by Category
General Fund Summary by Department
General Fund Opera�ng Summary
Other Funds Revenue and Expenditure Summary
City-Wide Fund Balances
Assigned Reserve, Con�ngency Calcula�on
Appropria�ons Limit Summary
Sales Tax Quarterly Summary
547
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 3 Accounting Methods
The ﬁgures presented in this execu�ve summary and the atached reports reﬂect general ledger balances as of September 30, 2023. Approximately 25% of the year has been reported. The city u�lizes an accrual basis of accoun�ng for all governmental funds, as required by the Generally Accepted Accoun�ng Standards (GAAP). To comply with GAAP, staﬀ accrues revenues received and expenditures occurring in the months of July and August back to the month of June . This matches the transac�on to the period in which revenue was earned or the expenditure occurred. The ﬁgures in this report represent the audited ﬁgures for June 30, 2023, and the Finance Department’s best es�mate of revenues and expenditures for September 30, 2023, as of the published date of this report.

GENERAL FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s General Fund is the largest and most ﬂexible of the city’s funds as it contains all unrestricted revenues and provides the most discre�on for expenditures. Major General Fund revenue sources include sales tax, property tax, franchise fees, permit fees, and intergovernmental. The General Fund holds the majority of services provided to the community including police services, community development, and general government. The General Fund Overview table provides budgeted revenues and expenditures in addi�on to actual revenues and expenditures. The percentage reﬂects the percentage of budget u�lized.

Balanced Budge�ng – Per the city’s adopted
Budget Policy, the total expenditure
appropria�ons shall not exceed the total of
es�mated revenues. In the adopted ﬁscal year
2023-24 budget, total General Fund expenditure
appropria�ons did not exceed revenues and the
total budget surplus totaled $20.3 million. Details
regarding the city’s opera�ng statement can be
found on page seven and in the Atachment
General Fund Opera�ng Summary.

Net Revenue/Change in Fund Balance - The
General Fund will likely complete the ﬁscal year
with $ 20.3 million in net revenue, also called a
budget surplus (revenue minus expenditures), for
the ﬁscal year 2023-24. These funds have been
allocated towards capital infrastructure reserves ;
commited reserves were iden�ﬁed during the 2023-24 budget process and adopted by council via resolu�on.

It should be noted that the Fire Fund also consists of General Fund revenues, however due to agreements with Riverside County the fund is separated as an other-purpose general fund for budgeting purposes. The Fire Fund is collapsed into the General Fund on the city’s ﬁnancial statements. Fire Fund information is in the section following the General Fund in this report.

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
As a general note, not all revenues are received monthly including sales tax, property tax, and franchise fees. The State of California provides monthly es�mated sales tax advance installments and issues the city a quarterly true-up a�er the State receives quarterly tax returns from businesses. A majority of property tax is typically received solely in the second half of General Fund Overview
3-Months Ended September 30, 2023
General Fund
Overview
Adjusted
Budget
Actual
Ac�vity
%
Revenues 64,717,296 7,934,056 12%
Expenditures 44,448,679 13,946,702 31%
Surplus (Deﬁcit) 20,268,618 (6,012,646)
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 2021-22 Actuals 2022-23 Actuals 2023-24 Budget
2023-24 Actuals
To-Date
Millions
Year-by-Year Revenue and Expenditures
Revenue Expenditure
548
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 4 the ﬁscal year and as a result, a large por�on of property tax revenues have not yet been received for the ﬁscal year .

Franchise fees are received quarterly, a�er the quarter ends.

Overall, actual revenues stand at 12% of budget due solely to the issue listed above. Overall, General Fund revenues are at $7,934,056.

Detail of Specific Revenue Categories
Sales Tax – Sales tax revenues are highly
indica�ve of economic circumstances. The
city u�lizes HdL Companies for sales tax
analysis. Budget currently stands at $ 46.3
million. For the ﬁrst quarter repor�ng
period, only July sales tax revenues have
been received , totaling $3.6 million . Sales
tax is the city’s largest revenue source and
for monitoring purposes staﬀ created an
Atachment to this report �tled Sales Tax
Summary. Although taxes were not
received in the repor�ng period, ﬁrst
quarter taxes have been received as of the
publish date of this quarterly report. First
quarter sales taxes came in at $11.7 million,
which is on target with budget projec�ons.

It should be noted that because these
revenues were not received during the ﬁrst quarter, all other reports omit these sales tax revenues.

Property Tax – Property tax revenues are based solely on the valua�on of property, both secured and unsecured, within the city . Secured property is property including land and buildings; unsecured property includes equipment and machinery. Property tax revenues are typically received in the second half of the ﬁscal year. Actual revenues are at $33,435 or 1% of budget.

Franchise Fees – This category is typically comprised of regular recurring revenues from solid waste collec�on, cable u�li�es, electric u�li�es, and natural gas u�li�es. Franchise fees stand at $185,539 or 8% of budget. Only one ﬁrst quarter payment for electric fees was received before the end of the quarter. The majority of regular and recurring franchise fee payments have not yet been received for the ﬁrst quarter.

Licenses, Fees, and Permits – Unlike tax revenues, this category of revenue is received on a daily basis at the city’s front counter and is comprised of construc�on, planning, building permits and fees, and business registra�on. Overall, this category is at $656,911 or 27% of budget. Contracted services and employee wages drive the fees charged to private developers for planning and building fees. Within the category, speciﬁc divisions and types of fees performed diﬀerently during the ﬁrst quarter. As departments, Community Development, Engineering, and Community Services appear on trend; budget is at 28%, 27%, and 29% respec�vely. More speciﬁcally, building ﬁxed fees are at 22% of budget, which is a litle low compared to the prior year and may be indica�ve of a drop in building permits. Encroachment development fees are exceeding budget es�mates at 34%. Legal fees are on target at 28 %. Passport service revenues are below budget projec�ons at 15%; although passport service demand remains heightened, the department ’s passport service posi�on was vacant for the month of July. Business registra�on fees on target at 27% of budget.

Sales & Use Tax
71%
Intergovernmental
10%
Property Taxes
6%
License, Permits & Fees
4%
Franchise Fees
4%
Use of Money & Property
3%
Fines, Penalties &
Forfeitures
1%
Transfers In
1%
Miscellaneous

0.25%
Revenue Budget Breakdown
549
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 5 Intergovernmental – This category is populated by Vehicle License in Lieu fees (VLF). VLF revenues are typically received in the last six months of the ﬁscal year, 50% within quarter three and the ﬁnal 50% in quarter four. As a result, actuals stand at zero.

Use of Money and Property – This category is populated investment income. Budget was es�mated at $2,100,000 and actuals are at $ 2,830,966, or 135% of budget. Net of an unrealized gain reversal from the prior year required by the Government Accoun�ng Standards Board, interest stands at $686,819, or 33% of budget, which is on target with budget es�mates.

Transfers In – This category stands at 100%. The category consists of transfers-in to the General Fund from other funds .

Transfers include the $531,786 for the city’s cost alloca�on plan (CAP). The CAP is an administra�ve charge to other funds to help fund the cost of General Fund internal services such as informa�on technology, ﬁnance, and human resources.

Overall, General Fund revenues are at $7,934,056 or 12% of budget.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES
Detail Information on General Fund Sales and Property Tax Revenue Categories Sales Tax: Sales tax is the number one revenue source for the General Fund. For every dollar of sales tax paid, only $0.13 is received by the City of Eastvale. The other $0.87 goes to the State General Fund ($0.51), the State Local Revenue Fund ($0.14), Riverside County Transporta�on
Commission ($0.06), a State Local Revenue Fund speciﬁc to local health and social services programs ($0.06), State Local Public Safety Fund ($0.06), and the Riverside County
Transporta�on Fund ($0.03). For more informa�on on what agencies receive sales tax revenue go to:
www.cd�a.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/sut-rates-descrip�on.htm

Property Tax: Property tax is the number four largest revenue source for the city’s General Fund and is the number one revenue source for the city’s Fire Fund. However, like sales tax every dollar of base property tax that a property owner pays only $0.02 is received by the city’s General Fund; another $0.06 is received by the city’s Fire Fund. Over $0.51 goes towards educa�on to the Corona Norco Uniﬁed School district, Riverside
Community College, and Riverside County Oﬃce of
Educa�on. Riverside Count y receives $0.29. The
remaining $0.04 goes to several special districts and
ﬂood control administra�on. The property tax revenues
received by the Fire Fund are restricted to Fire Services expenditures.

This breakdown of costs is only for the base property
tax rate. Many Eastvale residents also pay levies for
special assessments, including special ﬁnancing
districts, such as landscape ligh�ng maintenance
districts and community facility district s. For more
informa�on about special ﬁnancing districts in Eastvale go to: www.eastvaleca.gov/government/ ﬁnance -
department/special-ﬁnancing-districts

$0.51 State
General Fund
$0.14 State Local
Revenue Fund
$0.13 EASTVALE
$0.06 RIVCO RCTC
$0.06 State Local Rev
$0.06 State Local Safety
$0.03 RIVCO Transporta�on
For every $1 of paid sales tax, the city only
receives 13 cents . The remainder is spread among
State and County agencies.
550
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 6

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
A comparison of the adjusted budget to actual expenditures provides an overview of how actual expenditures compare to the city’s budget. Overall, actual expenditures are at $13,946,702 or 31% of budget.

Detail of Specific Expenditure Categories
Contract Services – This category is the largest category and includes contract services for law enforcement ,
building and safety, planning, and public works.

Currently, actual expenditures for the total contract
category are $226,584 or 1% of budget; total budget for this category is $ 17.9 million. The largest expenditure within this category is the Law Enforcement contract
with Riverside County Sheriﬀ ; budget for law
enforcement totals $14.1 million. Other major contracts in this category are animal control, crossing guards, legal services, and support services for all major departments.

Many invoices for ﬁrst quarter services have not been
processed as of September 30
th; as a result, this category
appears unusually low.

Personnel – The personnel category contains the salary
and beneﬁt costs for city employees. This category generated actual expenditures at $1,590,693 or 17% of budget. Staﬀ expects to see savings in this category due to new posi�ons remaining vacant during recruitment during the ﬁrst quarter, including six Public Works posi�ons, three Community Safety posi�ons, two Community Development posi�ons, and two City Clerk posi�ons. Much of the savings in Community Safety and Public Works will be u�lized to oﬀset contract services in those departments due to the need to contract for services while the posi�ons remained vacant.

Opera�ons – Opera�ons is a broad category including supplies, adver�sing, u�li�es, postage, and janitorial. Actual expenditures in this category are at $755,173 or 17% of budget.

Capital Outlay – Capital outlay consists of oﬃce equipment, computer hardware and so�ware, furniture, and ﬁxtures with a cost greater than $5,000. This category is at $288,584 or 42% of budget. Most of the city’s so�ware contracts are paid in advance in July for the en�re ﬁscal year, causing a front loading of expenditures. This category also houses capital expenditures for a new truck and equipment for the city ’s ﬁrst Commer cial Enforcement Oﬃcer posi�on in Law Enforcement.

Debt Service – Debt service in the General Fund accounts for the revenue neutrality agreement with Riverside County.

The agreement was based on es�mated tax revenue losses experienced by Riverside County as a result of the city’s incorpora�on; the obliga�on is paid to Riverside County through both the General Fund and the Fire Fund. The County invoices the city towards the end of the ﬁscal year, as a result, actuals stands at zero. Budget for revenue n eutrality is $320,000.

Transfers-Out – The transfers-out category in the General Fund accounts for the movement of cash from the General Fund to another fund. Budget includes $9,967,662 million in transfers out to the General Capital Improvement Fund, $1,020,000 for capital maintenance reserves, and $19,640 for General Fund beneﬁt contribu�ons for several Landscape and Ligh�ng Maintenance Districts and one Beneﬁt Assessment District. This beneﬁt contribu�on and the capital maintenance reserve contribu�ons are the only opera�ng transfers within the category.

Contract Services
55%
Personnel
28%
Operations
13%
Capital
Outlay
2%
Maintenance
1%
Debt Service
1%
Expenditure Budget Breakdown
551
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 7 Overall, the General Fund is at $13,946,702 or 31% of expenditure budget.

GENERAL FUND OPERATING STATEMENT
General Fund Operating Statement - The
General Fund is currently expected to generate
$31,102,296 in operating revenues and
$33,461,017 in operating expenditures. Operating
expenditures exceed revenues and as a result, the
General Fund has an operating deficit of
$2,358,721. On the non -operating side, the
General Fund is expe cted to bring in $33,615,000
in non -operating revenues and $10,987,662 in
non-operating expenditures. Non-operating revenues exceed expenditures and as a result, the General Fund has a non - operating surplus of $22,627,338 and the city is utilizing these non -operating revenues to support operating costs. Non- operating revenues are comprised of two sources of revenue, sales tax and interest. The sales tax revenue represents a local business in the business and industry category that changed business structure and as a result county pool sales tax was redistributed to host cities. At this time, staff considers this new sales tax source as one -time and non-operating in nature as the stability of the revenue is unknown. As a result, the revenue will be set aside for future capital improvement projects, such as the city’s civic center development at the Leal Property. The interest represents investment earnings on reserves for the civic center project; these reserves will be depleted within the next two to three fiscal years. As a result, staff views the investment earnings as non-operating. Non-operating expenditures consist of transfers out for the city ’s capital replacement reserves and capital improvement plan. As of September 30th, total net revenue is ($6,012,646).

FIRE FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s Fire Fund contains all revenues and expenditures related to the provision of ﬁre services in the city. The Fire Fund is considered General Fund monies; however, it has been restricted by Riverside County through the city’s revenue neutrality agreement and therefore is separated from the city’s unrestricted General Fund.

Revenues – Major Fire Fund revenue sources include property tax, licenses, permits, and fees, and use of money and property. Property tax, like the General Fund is primarily received in the second half of the ﬁscal year. Property tax is currently at 0% of budget. Property tax is the largest single source of revenue for the Fire Fund.

Licenses,
permits, and fees are at 9% of budget, primarily due to a signiﬁcant decrease in ﬁre plan check permits.

Investment income populates the category of use of money and property. Budget was es�mated at $200,000 and actuals are at $104,498 or 52% of budget. Staﬀ will likely request a budget appropria�on at mid-year to recognize the increase in investment earnings.

Overall, Fire Fund revenues are at $112,838 or 1% of budget.

Expenditures – The prior year fourth quarter invoice for Riverside County Fire contract services was accrued to the prior year in the ﬁrst quarter, but was not recognized as an expenditure un�l the second quarter. As a result, there is a nega�ve $1.6 million accoun�ng entry in the ﬁrst period causing the contract service category to appear upside down. The ﬁ rst General Fund Operating Statement as of 09/30/2023

Operating Revenue Actuals 7,781,770
Operating Expenditure Actuals 2,959,040
Operating Surplus 4,822,729

Non-Operating Revenue Actuals 152,286
Non-Operating Expenditure Actuals 10,987,662
Non-Operating Surplus (10,835,376)

Net Revenue (6,012,646)
Fire Fund Overview
3-Months Ended September 30, 2023
General Fund
Overview
Adjusted
Budget
Actual
Ac�vity
%
Revenues 8,692,500 112,838 1%
Expenditures 8,886,850 (1,572,762) (18%)
Surplus (Deﬁcit) (194,350) (1,459,925)
552
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 8 quarter invoice for the new ﬁscal year has not been received as of the publish date of this report. As a result, net of the prior year entry, contract services are at $10,407 or 0.14% of budget.

Opera�ons is a broad category including supplies, adver�sing, u�li�es, postage, and janitorial.

Maintenance and opera�ons actuals are at 14%
and 5% respec�vely. Maintenance and
opera�ons include building maintenance,
vehicle maintenance and fuel, and u�li�es.

Actual expenditures in the opera�ons category
are at $ 11,782 or 5% of budget . Maintenance
stands at $9,310 or 14% of budget.

Capital outlay is budgeted at $1,015,000 and is
solely for the design of the city ’s th ird ﬁre
sta�on. This budget is considered one -�me,
non—opera�onal and will not con�nue into the
future.

Overall, the Fire Fund is at ($1,572,762) or (18%)
of expenditure budget, mostly due to the ﬁrst
quarter CalFIRE invoice remaining outstanding and the required accrual entry for the prior year invoice.

Net Revenue – The Fire Fund is currently projected to complete the ﬁscal year with a nega�ve net revenue balance of ($194,350), for the ﬁscal year 2023-24. The budget shor�all is due to the capital outlay budget of $1.0 million for the city’s third ﬁre sta�on.

OTHER FUND OBSERVATIONS
The city’s other funds consist of governmental special revenue funds and six funds solely consis�ng of General Fund contribu�ons, the Capital Projects Fund, the Debt Service Fund, and four capital replacement reserve funds. These funds were created in order to track capital projects funded by the General Fund and debt.

MAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Capital Projects Fund – This fund was considered a major fund for the 2022-23 ﬁnancial audit. Revenues are solely from the General Fund and the purpose of the fund is to track speciﬁc one -�me general-fund capital improvement projects.

The fund holds adequate fund balance to cover budgeted expenditures and does not build fund balance over �me. Major projects for the ﬁscal year include the Limonite Gap Bridge, I -15 Corridor Landscaping Improvement, Prado Dam Inunda�on U�lity Mi�ga�on, Hamner Place Beau�ﬁca�on, Civic Center Design, and Citrus Property Modular Oﬃces.

NEGATIVE FUND BALANCE IN SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Several special revenue funds currently have and are projected to complete the year with nega�ve fund balance.

According to GASB requirements the General Fund will be required to cover those nega�ve fund balances at the end of the ﬁscal year. Gas Tax is projected to complete the ﬁscal year with a nega�ve fund balance, this was a Capital Improvement Plan over-budge�ng error that will be corrected during the mid-year process. The TDA fund is also projected to ﬁnish the ﬁscal year with a nega�ve fund balance. During the audit process, Finance staﬀ discovered that TDA projects and funding were incorrectly budgeted in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund. A correc�on will be processed during the Mid- Year process. The Miscellaneous Grants Fund is projected to have a signiﬁcant nega�ve fund balance of $11.4 million. This fund is reimbursed in two ways, progress payments at certain milestone points during projects or a�er projects are -4
-2
0 2
4 6
8 10
2021-22 Actuals 2022-23 Actuals 2023-24 Budget 2023-24 Actuals Millions
Year-by-Year Revenue and Expenditures
Revenue Expenditure
553
Executive Summary
City of Eastvale UNAUDITED
Fiscal Year 2022-23
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending September 30, 2023 | 3 months, 25% Reported

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 9 completed. Currently, the fund has outstanding milestone and completed project reimbursements. Public Works is working on submi�ng reimbursement requests. The TUMF Reimbursement Fund has a comparable situa�on as the Miscellaneous Grants Fund and the city is wai�ng to receive reimbursements. The city transferred over 88 ligh�ng maintenance districts and illumina�on districts from Jurupa Community Services District in the current ﬁscal year and several of those districts arrived with nega�ve fund balance. The General Fund will contribute to those funds to cover the nega�ve fund balance.

A Note Regarding Government Accounting and Budgeting
Most agencies manage governmental funds and budgets using a method called “modiﬁed accrual” accoun�ng. Modiﬁed accrual means that governmental funds are managed on a cash basis throughout the year. At year-end accruals are processed to ensure revenues and expenditures are recorded in the appropriate ﬁscal year in which the transac�ons actually occurred. This method applies to all the city’s funds (General Fund and Special Revenue funds).

As an illustra�on, revenue is recorded as it is received throughout the ﬁscal year (cash basis). The majority of General Fund revenues are received sporadically throughout the year, and most is received or accrued in the ﬁnal nine months of the ﬁscal year. Meanwhile, expenditures con�nue each month, regardless of whether revenues have been received. This circumstance highlights the importance of maintaining an adequate opera�ng reserve that allows for cash ﬂow needs throughout the ﬁscal year, especiall y during months in which some revenues categories are not received.

554

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months General Fund Summary by Category
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 2023-24

GENERAL FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes 3,662,139$ 4,004,362$ 3 ,817,700$ 3 3,435 1 % (3,784,265)$ Sales & Use Tax 44,710,286 47,356,371 4 6,250,000 3 ,637,325 8 % (42,612,675) Franchise Fees 1,971,912 6,556,660 2 ,390,000 1 85,539 8 % (2,204,461) License, Permits & Fees 2,333,526 2,347,535 2 ,436,750 6 56,911 2 7% (1,779,839) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 567,641 724,866 7 84,000 5 8,079 7 % (725,921) Intergovernmental 6,367,511 6,077,206 6 ,245,000 - 0 % (6,245,000) Use of Money & Property 151,235 1,511,747 2 ,100,000 2 ,830,966 1 35% 730,966 Miscellaneous 772,062 299,556 1 62,060 1 5 0 % (162,045) Transfers In 7,417,458 298,240 5 31,786 5 31,786 1 00% - Total General Fund Revenues 67,953,770 69,176,543 6 4,717,296 7 ,934,056 1 2% (56,783,240) Expenditures
Salaries 3,824,393$ 4,612,233$ 6 ,606,056$ 1 ,183,733 1 8% (5,422,323)$ Benefits 1,356,725 1,515,650 2 ,628,414 4 06,960 1 5% (2,221,454) Contract Services 13,945,325 15,778,352 1 7,882,051 2 26,584 1 % (17,655,467) Maintenance 205,290 345,138 4 08,500 7 8,366 1 9% (330,134) Operations 4,497,708 1,561,606 4 ,381,335 7 55,173 1 7% (3,626,162) Capital Outlay 187,826 758,553 6 91,270 2 88,584 4 2% (402,686) Debt Service 3,109,421 533,242 3 20,000 - 0 % (320,000) Transfers Out 6,597,427 12,761,462 1 1,531,052 1 1,007,302 9 5% (523,750) Total General Fund Expenditures 33,724,114 37,866,236 4 4,448,679 1 3,946,702 3 1% (30,501,976) NET REVENUE 34,229,656 31,310,307 2 0,268,618 (6 ,012,646)

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire Services) 7,601,854$ 8,379,338$ 8 ,400,000$ - 0 % (8,400,000)$ Sales & Use Tax - - - - 0 % -
Franchise Fees - - - - 0 % -
Other Taxes - - - - 0 % -
License, Permits & Fees 94,451 77,971 9 0,000 8 ,339 9 % (81,661) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures - 92,793 2 ,500 - 0 % (2,500) Intergovernmental - - - - 0 % -
Use of Money & Property (1,616) 432,432 2 00,000 1 04,498 5 2% (95,502) Miscellaneous - - - - 0 % -
Transfers - - - - 0 % -
Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,694,689 8,982,534 8 ,692,500 1 12,838 1 % (8,579,662) Expenditures
Salaries 808$ -$ -$ - 0 % -$
Benefits - - - - 0 % -
Contract Services 5,654,282 6,298,267 7 ,234,950 ( 1,593,855) - 22% (8,828,805) Maintenance 56,463 70,167 6 5,000 9 ,310 1 4% (55,690) Operations 447,634 (87,248) 2 51,900 1 1,782 5 % (240,118) Capital Outlay 38,200 26,094 1 ,015,000 - 0 % (1,015,000) Debt Service 262,228 272,717 3 20,000 - 0 % (320,000) Transfers Out - - - - 0 % -
Total General Fund Expenditures 6,459,615 6,579,997 8 ,886,850 (1 ,572,762) - 18% (10,459,612) NET REVENUE 1,235,074 2,402,537 (1 94,350) (1 ,459,925) % Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 10 555

GENERAL FUND
Revenues
General Services
Non Departmental 65,076,959$ 66,138,827$ 61,551,546$ 7,227,680 12% (54,323,866)$ City Clerk 54,411 74,273 70,150 10,684 15% (59,466) City Manager 10,258 - - - 0% - Finance 126,297 145,228 100,100 27,094 27% (73,006) General Government - - - - 0% - City Attorney 80,205 22,944 44,000 12,386 28% (31,614) Subtotal General Services 65,348,130 66,381,272 61,765,796 7,277,844 12% (54,487,952) Community Development
Community Development 209,777$ 117,231$ 220,000$ 61,789 28% (158,211)$ Subtotal Community Development 209,777 117,231 220,000 61,789 28% (158,211) Public Works
Public Works 854,409$ 778,728$ 730,000$ 199,068 27% (530,932)$ Subtotal Community Development 854,409 778,728 730,000 199,068 27% (530,932) Community Safety
Community Safety 905,318$ 1,240,799$ 1,183,000$ 340,186 29% (842,814)$ Subtotal Community Safety 905,318 1,240,799 1,183,000 340,186 29% (842,814) Public Safety
Public Safety 636,137$ 658,514$ 818,500$ 55,169 7% (763,331)$ Subtotal Public Safety 636,137 658,514 818,500 55,169 7% (763,331) Total General Fund Revenues 67,953,770 69,176,543 64,717,296 7,934,056 12% (56,252,307) Expenditures
General Services
100 City Council 224,419$ 162,650$ 240,168$ 34,351 14% (205,818)$ 110 City Attorney 317,860 295,852 370,000 - 0% (370,000) 290 General Government 11,394,573 12,680,685 12,836,652 11,065,141 86% (1,771,512) Subtotal General Services 11,936,851 13,139,186 13,446,820 11,099,491 83% (2,347,329)$ City Manager
200 City Manager 609,470$ 521,256$ 696,806$ 124,355 18% (572,451)$ Subtotal City Manager 609,470 521,256 696,806 124,355 18% (572,451)$ Human Resources & Risk
220 Human Resources 651,178$ 601,869$ 845,629$ 188,233 22% (657,396)$ 230 Risk Management 386,678 388,154 820,320 537,178 65% (283,142) Subtotal Human Resources & Risk 1,037,856 990,024 1,665,949 725,411 44% (940,538)$ City Clerk/Communications
120 City Clerk 444,667$ 579,863$ 613,451$ 92,514 15% (520,937)$ 240 Information Technology 304,454 289,575 429,564 53,976 13% (375,587) 260 Communications 244,365 320,256 504,916 66,672 13% (438,244) 720 Events 682,857 1,003,507 1,059,568 105,380 10% (954,188) Subtotal City Clerk/Communication 1,676,343 2,193,201 2,607,499 318,543 (2,288,956)$ Finance
210 Finance 910,324$ 1,139,254$ 1,362,560$ 221,287 16% (1,141,273)$ Subtotal Finance 910,324 1,139,254 1,362,560 221,287 16% (1,141,273)$ Community Development
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 11 556

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months General Fund Summary by Departments
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
%
Budget
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 Used 2023-24 301 Administration 1,108,869$ 1,356,552$ 858,644$ 163,313 19% (695,332)$ 300 Planning 610,794 686,329 989,413 81,216 8% (908,197) 302 Economic Development - - 619,485 67,248 11% (552,237) Subtotal Community Development 1,719,663 2,042,881 2,467,543 311,777 13% (2,155,765)$ Public Works
320 Engineering 1,447,314$ 1,419,521$ 2,983,329$ 308,171 10% (2,675,157)$ 500 Public Works 368,711 275,437 823,876 97,849 12% (726,027) 295 Facility Maintenance 467,728 557,645 353,147 154,779 44% (198,368) 296 Facility Landscaping - 181,504 176,087 46,272 26% (129,815) 600 Landscaping (public right-of-way) 1,074 - - - 0% - Subtotal Community Development 2,284,828 2,434,108 4,336,439 607,071 14% (3,729,367)$ Community Safety
311 Administration 19,679$ 315,828$ 786,126$ 84,985 11% (701,141)$ 310 Building Safety 1,337,997 1,273,580 1,541,986 (7,276) 0% (1,549,262) 330 Community Enhancement & Safety 764,036 811,417 985,684 184,816 19% (800,868) Subtotal Community Safety 2,121,711 2,400,825 3,313,796 262,525 8% (3,051,271)$ Public Safety
400 Law Enforcement 11,097,700$ 12,621,198$ 14,061,266$ 252,438 2% (13,808,829)$ 430 Animal Control 233,268 276,155 350,000 23,804 7% (326,196) 440 Crossing Guards 96,099 108,149 140,000 - 0% (140,000) Subtotal Public Safety 11,427,066 13,005,502 14,551,266 276,242 2% (14,275,025)$ Total General Fund Expenditures 33,724,114 37,866,236 44,448,679 13,946,702 31% (30,501,976) TOTAL GENERAL FUND NET REVEN 34,229,656 31,310,307 20,268,618 (6,012,646)

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND
Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire Serv 7,601,854$ 8,379,338$ 8,400,000$ - 0% (8,400,000)$ Sales & Use Tax - - - - 0% - Franchise Fees - - - - 0% - Other Taxes - - - - 0% - License, Permits & Fees 94,451 77,971 90,000 8,339 9% (81,661) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures - 92,793 2,500 - 0% (2,500) Intergovernmental - - - - 0% - Use of Money & Property (1,616) 432,432 200,000 104,498 52% (95,502) Miscellaneous - - - - 0% - Transfers - - - - 0% - Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,694,689 8,982,534 8,692,500 112,838 1% (8,579,662) Expenditures
Public Safety
290 General Government 504,045$ 30,899$ 320,000$ - 0% (320,000)$ 295 Building Maintenance 184,581 145,792 133,900 20,364 15% (113,536) 296 Facility Landscaping - 22,065 66,000 6,596 10% (59,404) 320 Engineering 808 - - - 0% - 420 Fire Services 5,770,182 6,381,240 8,366,950 (1,599,723) -19% (9,966,673) Total Fire Fund Expenditures 6,459,615 6,579,997 8,886,850 (1,572,762) -18% (10,459,612)$ TOTAL FIRE FUND NET REVENUE 1,235,074 2,402,537 (194,350) 1,685,600 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 12 557

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months General Fund Operating Summary
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
%
Budget
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 Used 2023-24

GENERAL FUND
Operating Revenues
Property Taxes 3,662,139$ 4,004,362$ 3,817,700$ 33,435 1% (3,784,265)$ Sales & Use Tax 11,910,286 16,956,371 14,000,000 1,787,325 13% (12,212,675) Franchise Fees 1,971,912 2,556,660 2,390,000 185,539 8% (2,204,461) License, Permits & Fees 2,333,526 2,347,535 2,436,750 656,911 27% (1,779,839) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures 567,641 724,866 784,000 58,079 7% (725,921) Intergovernmental 6,367,511 6,077,206 6,245,000 - 0% (6,245,000) Use of Money & Property 172,785 536,747 735,000 4,528,679 616% 3,793,679 Miscellaneous 772,062 299,556 162,060 15 0% (162,045) Transfers In 57,239 298,240 531,786 531,786 100% - Total General Fund Operating R 27,815,101 33,801,543 31,102,296 7,781,770 25% (23,320,526) Operating Expenditures
Salaries 3,824,393$ 4,612,233$ 6,606,056$ 1,183,733 18% (5,422,323)$ Benefits 1,356,725 1,515,650 2,628,414 406,960 15% (2,221,454) Contract Services 13,945,325 15,778,352 17,882,051 226,584 1% (17,655,467) Maintenance 205,290 345,138 408,500 78,366 19% (330,134) Operations 3,192,633 1,561,606 4,381,335 755,173 17% (3,626,162) Capital Outlay 187,826 758,553 691,270 288,584 42% (402,686) Debt Service 1,250,371 533,242 320,000 - 0% (320,000) Transfers Out 735,475 2,442,453 543,390 19,640 4% (523,750) Total General Fund Operating E 24,698,037 27,547,227 33,461,017 2,959,040 9% (30,501,976) NET OPERATING REVENUE 3,117,064 6,254,316 (2,358,721) 4,822,729 Non-Operating Revenues
Sales Tax 32,800,000$ 30,400,000$ 32,250,000$ 1,850,000$ 6% (30,400,000)$ Franchise Fees (Retention Fees) - 4,000,000 - 0% - Use of Money and Property (Interes 384,586 975,000 1,365,000 446,433 33% (918,567) Use of Money and Property (Unrea (406,136) - - (2,144,146) 0% (2,144,146) Miscellaneous GASB 87 - - - - 0% - Transfers In (ARPA SLFRF) 7,360,219 - - - 0% - Total General Fund Non-Operat 40,138,669 35,375,000 33,615,000 152,286 -5% (33,462,714) Non-Operating Expenditures
Operations (Unrealized Loss) 1,305,075$ -$ - -$ 0% -$ Capital Outlay (GASB 87) - - - 0% - Debt Service (Tarpon Properties Pay 1,859,050 - - - 0% - Transfers Out (Streetlight Payoff) 3,808,933 - - - 0% - Transfers Out (Capital Replacement Reserves) 1,303,652 1,020,000 1,020,000 100% - Transfers Out (CIP) 2,053,019 9,015,357 9,967,662$ 9,967,662 100% - Total General Fund Non-Operat 9,026,077 10,319,009 10,987,662 10,987,662 100% - NET NON-OPERATING REVENUE 31,112,592 25,055,991 22,627,338 (10,835,376) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 13 558

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND -
Operating Revenues
Property Taxes (Restricted for Fire S 7,601,854$ 8,379,338$ 8,400,000$ - 0% (8,400,000)$ Sales & Use Tax - - - - 0% - Franchise Fees - - - - 0% - Other Taxes - - - - 0% - License, Permits & Fees 94,451 77,971 90,000 8,339 9% (81,661) Fines, Penalties & Forfeitures - 92,793 2,500 - 0% (2,500) Intergovernmental - - - - 0% - Use of Money & Property (1,616) 432,432 200,000 104,498 52% (95,502) Miscellaneous - - - - 0% - Transfers - - - - 0% - Total Fire Fund Revenues 7,694,689 8,982,534 8,692,500 112,838 1% (8,579,662) Operating Expenditures
Salaries 808$ -$ -$ - 0% -$ Benefits - - - - 0% - Staff Development - - - - 0% - Contract Services 5,654,282 6,298,267 7,234,950 (1,593,855) -22% (8,828,805) Maintenance 56,463 70,167 65,000 9,310 14% (55,690) Operations 447,634 (87,248) 251,900 11,782 5% (240,118) Capital Outlay 38,200 26,094 15,000 - 0% (15,000) Debt Service 262,228 272,717 320,000 - 0% (320,000) Transfers Out - - - - 0% - Subtotal Fire Fund Expenditures 6,459,615 6,579,997 7,886,850 (1,572,762) -20% (9,459,612) NET OPERATING REVENUE 1,235,074 2,402,537 805,650 (1,459,925) Non-Operating Revenues
Use of Money and Property (Unrealized Gain/Loss) - - -$ 0% -$ Transfers In - - - 0% - Total Fire Fund Non-Operating R - - - - 0% -$ Non-Operating Expenditures
CIP (Fire Station) -$ - 1,000,000 0% (1,000,000)$ CIP (Vehicle Purchase) - - - - 0% - Total Fire Fund Non-Operating E - - 1,000,000 - 0% (1,000,000)$ NET NON-OPERATING REVENUE - - (1,000,000) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 14 559

OTHER FUNDS
Revenues
200 Gas Tax 1,604,905$ 1,910,031$ 2,038,500$ 369,455$ 18% (1,669,045)$ 205 SB1 1,378,406 1,630,373 1,737,300 161,212 9% (1,576,088) 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) (493) 22,224 8,800 5,264 60% (3,536) 210 Measure A 2,189,098 3,561,411 2,075,500 286,407 14% (1,789,093) 211 TDA Fund - 146,666 334,820 - 0% (334,820) 220 AQMD 143,575 105,726 142,100 3,511 2% (138,589) 230 Grants: Law Enforcement Grants - - - - 0% - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund 668,027 520,685 2,281,129 - 0% (2,281,129) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund - - - - 0% - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund 7,360,219 - - - 0% - 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund 2,188 1,444 - - 0% - 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant - - - - 0% - 260 Local Law Enforcement Services 165,428 - - - 0% - 270 TUMF Reimbursement Fund - 13,818 - - 0% - 290 Transportation DIF 119,761 520,618 258,500 9,192 4% (249,308) 291 Fire DIF 46,690 70,837 45,500 3,928 9% (41,572) 292 Public Facilities DIF 102,648 69,972 163,000 1,534 1% (161,466) 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 454,300 218,470 125,000 50,396 40% (74,604) 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 3,820 4,743 - 3 0% 3 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 1,171 707 150 45 30% (105) 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 171,435 76,992 56,496 10,682 19% (45,814) 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 2,593 1,667 2,676 95 4% (2,581) 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 3,008 985 435 182 42% (253) 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 23,997 24,893 17,800 1,018 6% (16,782) 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 3,726 4,094 4,283 - 0% (4,283) 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 8,031 7,897 6,005 353 6% (5,652) 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 1,552 1,717 1,789 - 0% (1,789) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 7,659 9,512 9,702 - 0% (9,702) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 5,750 7,139 7,282 - 0% (7,282) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 12,563 11,259 9,665 3,962 41% (5,703) 312 LLMD 2014-1 19,499 18,215 16,726 10,296 62% (6,430) 313 LLMD 2014-3 8,489 7,114 8,442 3,895 46% (4,547) 314 LLMD 2014-4 6,850 6,071 4,120 2,023 49% (2,097) 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 10,162 11,030 11,914 35 0% (11,879) 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 74,687 41,746 93,435 1,645 2% (91,790) 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 43,192 49,212 50,611 384 1% (50,227) 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 73,498 95,925 99,652 (35) 0% (99,687) 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL 16,635 11,024 4,793 106 2% (4,687) 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A 2,006 8,149 4,700 2 0% (4,698) 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B 41,892 91,834 61,569 318 1% (61,251) 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C 4,299 16,645 10,043 32 0% (10,011) 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D 6,233 22,287 15,012 29 0% (14,983) 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F 29,516 22,359 10,355 211 2% (10,144) 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G 1,862 1,092 1,216 13 1% (1,203) 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S 2,420 1,320 1,612 12 1% (1,600) 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W 20,337 14,940 130 52 40% (78) 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A 49,149 18,360 13,848 284 2% (13,564) 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B 26,356 17,360 11,286 164 1% (11,122) 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C 1,423 1,094 647 8 1% (639) 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D 17,303 11,887 7,505 109 1% (7,396) % Budget
Used
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 15 560

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 2023-24
% Budget
Used
416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F 3,128 3,067 2,550 19 1% (2,531) 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G 26,486 10,287 8,477 156 2% (8,321) 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H 39,891 28,855 18,752 250 1% (18,502) 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J 27,374 18,512 12,670 164 1% (12,506) 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K 1,954 1,716 1,898 - 0% (1,898) 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M 2,315 2,771 1,611 16 1% (1,595) 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A 3,901 12,739 13,363 - 0% (13,363) 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B 3,372 9,909 8,051 14 0% (8,037) 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C 22,478 8,419 3,979 150 4% (3,829) 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D 45,713 17,458 7,911 302 4% (7,609) 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E 100,204 38,591 19,736 663 3% (19,073) 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F 38,201 14,954 3,458 292 8% (3,166) 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G 3,433 7,967 6,717 19 0% (6,698) 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H 15,451 6,331 3,374 94 3% (3,280) 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I 61,716 40,910 23,283 406 2% (22,877) 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J 17,644 11,936 6,683 118 2% (6,565) 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K 18,021 14,651 7,736 108 1% (7,628) 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L 19,057 14,175 7,957 130 2% (7,827) 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M 55,807 25,718 13,898 375 3% (13,523) 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N 40,800 43,034 19,394 222 1% (19,172) 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O 6,576 2,746 1,354 45 3% (1,309) 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P 38,497 14,526 7,223 256 4% (6,967) 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q 15,405 5,997 3,247 97 3% (3,150) 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R 1,849 1,699 1,020 13 1% (1,008) 440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S 7,430 3,061 1,495 50 3% (1,445) 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T 57,013 21,130 10,374 379 4% (9,995) 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U 37,570 14,313 7,639 204 3% (7,435) 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V 63,337 23,359 11,767 409 3% (11,358) 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W 19,463 7,854 8,300 127 2% (8,173) 445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X 5,519 2,365 1,176 37 3% (1,139) 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y 9,212 3,689 1,845 62 3% (1,783) 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z 10,185 4,093 2,024 68 3% (1,956) 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA 6,467 2,843 1,399 44 3% (1,355) 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB 6,006 2,464 1,147 41 4% (1,106) 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC 23,574 17,523 9,820 144 1% (9,676) 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD 50,873 23,649 13,161 345 3% (12,816) 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE 24,752 9,563 15,074 158 1% (14,916) 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF 30,391 21,436 11,643 204 2% (11,439) 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG 15,382 6,056 2,996 103 3% (2,893) 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH 12,334 4,877 2,443 82 3% (2,361) 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II 27,648 10,433 5,089 184 4% (4,905) 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ 4,943 2,102 1,032 34 3% (998) 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK 2,842 1,655 1,685 (0) 0% (1,685) 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL 10,721 4,358 2,119 42 2% (2,077) 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM 8,137 5,042 2,867 54 2% (2,813) 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN 19,085 7,293 3,641 127 3% (3,514) 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO 18,826 7,230 3,774 123 3% (3,651) 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP 22,147 8,413 4,200 140 3% (4,060) 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ 8,658 3,648 1,884 58 3% (1,826) 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR 57,429 21,582 11,395 380 3% (11,015) 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS 21,381 8,167 4,148 141 3% (4,007) 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT 9,128 3,602 1,834 58 3% (1,776) 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU 7,023 2,844 1,314 48 4% (1,266) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 16 561

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 2023-24
% Budget
Used
469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV 5,921 2,434 2,306 38 2% (2,268) 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW 24,592 9,570 4,851 163 3% (4,688) 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX 3,489 2,242 2,760 20 1% (2,740) 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY 27,233 19,033 10,864 179 2% (10,685) 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ 11,014 4,300 2,176 73 3% (2,103) 474 LMD 2001-3 Zone AAA 47,941 17,999 9,207 318 3% (8,889) 475 LMD 2001-3 Zone BBB 30,674 11,626 5,930 200 3% (5,730) 476 LMD 2001-3 Zone CCC 65,738 28,879 15,310 428 3% (14,882) 477 LMD 2001-3 Zone DDD 56,233 21,166 11,020 368 3% (10,652) 478 LMD 2001-3 Zone EEE 6,186 2,900 3,074 48 2% (3,026) 479 LMD 2001-3 Zone FFF 54,497 20,119 10,186 359 4% (9,827) 480 LMD 2001-3 Zone GGG 19,694 7,672 4,178 125 3% (4,053) 481 LMD 2001-3 Zone HHH 828 2,137 3,927 - 0% (3,927) 482 LMD 2001-3 Zone III 26,815 13,216 14,834 11 0% (14,823) 483 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJJ 31,081 11,775 6,066 204 3% (5,862) 484 LMD 2001-3 Zone LLL 6,082 11,151 4,812 37 1% (4,775) 485 LMD 2001-3 Zone MMM 20,050 8,225 4,229 133 3% (4,096) 486 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 35 8,749 3,795 5,193 36 1% (5,157) 487 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 42 2,513 1,496 1,737 10 1% (1,727) 488 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 46 9,336 3,263 4,566 8 0% (4,558) 489 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 49 11,841 4,113 4,677 45 1% (4,632) 490 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 55 2,344 679 669 9 1% (660) 500 Debt Service 4,509,981 - - - 0% - 600 Capital Projects 2,143,140 11,417,107 10,491,412 9,967,662 95% (523,750) 601 General Information Technology Capital Replacem - 433,652 50,000 50,000 100% - 602 General Fleet Capital Replacement Fund - 120,000 120,000 120,000 100% - 603 General Street Maintenance Capital Fund - 500,000 500,000 500,000 100% - 604 General Facility Maintenance Capital Fund - 250,000 250,000 250,000 100% - 700 Information Technology - - - - 0% - Total Other Fund Revenues 23,268,586 22,951,703 21,649,659 11,825,056 55% (9,824,603) Expenditures
200 Gas Tax 1,994,824$ 1,280,427$ 3,393,600$ 183,906$ 5% (3,209,694)$ 205 SB1 1,721,552 (7,078) 4,032,000 - 0% (4,032,000) 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) 17,322 (13,822) - - 0% - 210 Measure A 1,891,015 1,572,979 6,597,662 209,113 3% (6,388,549) 211 TDA Fund 102,318 44,348 - - 0% - 220 AQMD 123,899 1,844 67,440 - 0% (67,440) 230 Law Enforcement Grants - - - - 0% - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund 520,016 479,696 25,229,250 731,747 3% (24,497,504) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund - - - - 0% - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund 7,360,219 - - - 0% - 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund - - - - 0% - 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant - - - - 0% - 260 Local Law Enforcement Services 165,428 - - - 0% - 270 TUMF Reimbursement Fund 344,067 157,993 4,842,010 - 0% (4,842,010) 290 Transportation DIF 6,587 (3,547) 5,170 5,170 100% - 291 Fire DIF 8,376 (7,086) 910 910 100% - 292 Public Facilities DIF 9,146 485,117 3,260 3,260 100% - 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 229,679 (98,390) - - 0% - 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 508 159 800 8 1% (792) 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 425 8 500 2 0% (498) 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 84,713 (14,775) 38,335 10,562 28% (27,773) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 17 562

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 2023-24
% Budget
Used
303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 2,966 884 1,544 546 35% (998) 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 1,174 (374) 265 56 21% (209) 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 19,734 8,522 20,623 4,801 23% (15,822) 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 12,838 11,544 14,601 3,476 24% (11,125) 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 6,734 4,950 7,986 2,153 27% (5,833) 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 4,315 5,179 6,479 1,713 26% (4,766) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 15,413 19,258 32,336 7,489 23% (24,847) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 10,803 13,403 17,766 4,332 24% (13,434) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 7,887 4,860 9,586 2,834 30% (6,752) 312 LLMD 2014-1 8,527 5,096 16,562 4,198 25% (12,364) 313 LLMD 2014-3 5,346 3,603 8,413 2,325 28% (6,088) 314 LLMD 2014-4 2,399 726 3,994 997 25% (2,997) 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 3,840 3,198 4,163 1,673 40% (2,491) 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 7,697 1,612 36,359 8,189 23% (28,171) 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 20,518 25,840 34,870 12,853 37% (22,017) 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 83,623 123,806 155,656 38,534 25% (117,122) 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL 1,698 5,417 7,798 1,841 24% (5,957) 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A 4,197 4,141 5,818 1,365 23% (4,453) 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B 28,806 40,253 30,644 10,054 33% (20,590) 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C 4,028 8,395 11,535 2,714 24% (8,821) 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D 8,607 10,981 14,857 3,523 24% (11,334) 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F 2,892 8,944 12,500 2,958 24% (9,542) 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G 145 477 533 153 29% (380) 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S 336 995 1,229 364 30% (865) 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W 6,258 18,434 7,853 3,910 50% (3,943) 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A 3,342 10,987 12,350 3,786 31% (8,564) 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B 2,788 8,921 12,613 3,132 25% (9,481) 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C 130 691 840 218 26% (622) 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D 1,870 6,090 8,463 2,094 25% (6,369) 416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F 528 1,785 2,508 613 24% (1,895) 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G 1,616 4,767 9,368 3,010 32% (6,358) 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H 4,696 14,741 21,816 5,298 24% (16,518) 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J 3,096 10,315 14,512 3,639 25% (10,873) 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K 841 2,832 3,523 1,288 37% (2,235) 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M 373 1,360 2,081 473 23% (1,608) 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A 18,822 4,986 5,705 1,506 26% (4,199) 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B 6,507 3,327 4,275 1,005 24% (3,270) 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C 1,011 2,794 2,834 810 29% (2,024) 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D 2,297 6,211 6,394 1,825 29% (4,569) 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E 5,080 13,735 14,136 3,999 28% (10,137) 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F 447 1,430 1,078 306 28% (772) 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G 2,379 4,446 4,163 1,174 28% (2,989) 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H 1,149 3,227 3,561 987 28% (2,574) 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I 5,857 18,922 27,395 6,259 23% (21,136) 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J 1,659 5,419 7,748 1,766 23% (5,982) 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K 2,579 8,217 11,873 2,727 23% (9,146) 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L 2,020 6,185 9,048 2,036 23% (7,012) 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M 3,567 9,448 11,021 2,862 26% (8,159) 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N 7,409 29,601 35,908 8,124 23% (27,784) 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O 319 935 959 266 28% (693) 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P 1,835 5,015 5,015 1,450 29% (3,565) 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q 900 2,753 2,620 740 28% (1,880) 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R 221 815 1,354 304 22% (1,050) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 18 563

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months Other Funds Summary
*Data includes transfers
Audited Actuals
Unaudited
Actuals
Amended
Budget Actuals
Amount
Over(Under)
Budget
Description 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 9/30/2023 2023-24
% Budget
Used
440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S 359 1,063 1,085 304 28% (781) 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T 2,633 7,191 7,165 2,043 29% (5,122) 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U 1,964 12,620 5,517 1,599 29% (3,918) 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V 3,075 9,454 8,689 2,482 29% (6,207) 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W 1,058 3,136 3,448 949 28% (2,499) 445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X 274 831 871 240 28% (631) 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y 446 1,311 1,348 379 28% (969) 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z 491 1,424 1,454 408 28% (1,046) 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA 331 1,015 1,116 296 26% (820) 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB 262 801 834 229 27% (605) 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC 2,502 10,381 11,359 2,543 22% (8,816) 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD 2,821 8,547 10,475 2,604 25% (7,872) 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE 1,437 3,986 4,094 1,167 28% (2,927) 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF 3,107 10,264 11,121 2,632 24% (8,489) 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG 747 2,120 2,131 604 28% (1,527) 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH 601 1,718 1,812 506 28% (1,306) 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II 1,279 3,571 3,605 1,026 28% (2,579) 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ 235 734 759 210 28% (549) 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK 1,222 3,317 3,887 1,064 27% (2,823) 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL 513 6,370 1,592 438 28% (1,154) 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM 709 2,273 3,109 735 24% (2,374) 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN 904 2,567 2,633 747 28% (1,886) 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO 951 2,726 2,928 819 28% (2,109) 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP 1,174 3,807 3,460 986 29% (2,474) 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ 461 1,317 1,454 397 27% (1,057) 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR 2,837 7,600 7,623 2,179 29% (5,444) 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS 1,027 2,920 3,097 875 28% (2,222) 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT 521 1,526 1,592 451 28% (1,141) 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU 305 909 953 261 27% (692) 469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV 366 1,082 1,166 323 28% (843) 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW 1,231 3,440 3,423 979 29% (2,444) 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX 342 1,452 1,755 552 31% (1,203) 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY 2,722 8,934 12,951 2,939 23% (10,012) 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ 536 1,516 1,517 430 28% (1,087) 474 LMD 2001-3 Zone AAA 2,252 6,256 6,344 1,800 28% (4,544) 475 LMD 2001-3 Zone BBB 1,610 4,427 4,564 1,291 28% (3,273) 476 LMD 2001-3 Zone CCC 4,129 11,916 13,403 3,526 26% (9,877) 477 LMD 2001-3 Zone DDD 2,857 7,810 7,886 2,251 29% (5,635) 478 LMD 2001-3 Zone EEE 73 470 439 115 26% (324) 479 LMD 2001-3 Zone FFF 2,621 7,194 6,821 1,963 29% (4,858) 480 LMD 2001-3 Zone GGG 1,204 3,308 3,473 957 28% (2,516) 481 LMD 2001-3 Zone HHH 2,030 2,459 2,119 636 30% (1,483) 482 LMD 2001-3 Zone III 3,679 30,926 8,664 2,534 29% (6,130) 483 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJJ 1,547 4,301 4,438 1,260 28% (3,178) 484 LMD 2001-3 Zone LLL 7,900 2,128 2,558 678 27% (1,880) 485 LMD 2001-3 Zone MMM 1,078 2,959 3,047 870 29% (2,177) 486 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 35 1,250 3,618 4,250 1,442 34% (2,808) 487 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 42 407 1,341 1,693 541 32% (1,152) 488 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 46 1,212 8,226 3,749 1,181 32% (2,568) 489 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 49 1,498 5,027 4,789 1,566 33% (3,223) 490 Illumination District No 2 Subarea 55 268 821 953 291 31% (662) 500 Debt Service 4,510,719 - - - 0% - 600 Capital Projects 1,021,164 3,273,187 15,336,320 77,471 1% (15,258,849) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 19 564

GENERAL FUNDS
100 General Fund 96,083,818$ 127,394,125$ 64,717,296$ 44,448,679$ 147,662,742$ TOTAL General Funds 96,083,818 127,394,125 64,717,296 44,448,679 147,662,742

OTHER PURPOSE GENERAL FUNDS
110 Restricted Structural Fire Fund 14,473,114$ 16,875,651$ 8,692,500$ 8,886,850$ 16,681,301$ TOTAL Other Purpose General Funds 14,473,114 16,875,651 8,692,500 8,886,850 16,681,301

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
200 Gas Tax Fund 3,154,024$ 3,783,628$ 2,038,500$ 3,393,600$ 2,428,528$ 205 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund 800,050 2,437,501 1,737,300 4,032,000 142,801 206 Area Drainage Plan (ADP) 885,689 921,734 8,800 - 930,534 210 Measure A Fund 4,648,626 6,637,058 2,075,500 6,597,662 2,114,896 211 TDA Fund (102,318) - 334,820 - 334,820 220 Air Quality Management District 513,467 617,349 142,100 67,440 692,009 230 Law Enforcement Grants - - - - - 240 Grants: Miscellaneous Grants Fund (14,784) 26,204 2,281,129 25,229,250 (22,921,917) 241 Grants: Coronavirus Relief Fund - - - - - 242 Grants: American Rescue Plan Act Fund - - - - - 243 Public, Educational, or Governmental Access Fund 2,703 4,147 - - 4,147 250 Grants: Community Development Block Grant (7) (7) - - (7) 260 Local Law Enforcement Services - - - - - 270 TUMF Reimbursement Find (625,167) (769,342) - 4,842,010 (5,611,352) 290 DIF Transportation Facilities Fund 423,775 947,941 258,500 5,170 1,201,271 291 DIF Fire Facilities Fund 538,832 616,755 45,500 910 661,345 292 DIF Public Facilities Fund 590,338 175,194 163,000 3,260 334,934 293 Road and Bridge Benefit District 6,670,033 6,986,893 125,000 - 7,111,893 300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 (4,069) 515 - 800 (285) 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 7,210 7,910 150 500 7,560 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 1,788,103 1,879,870 56,496 38,335 1,898,031 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 16,207 16,990 2,676 1,544 18,122 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 30,600 31,958 435 265 32,128 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 166,660 183,032 17,800 20,623 180,209 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 (28,207) (35,657) 4,283 14,601 (45,975) 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 61,041 63,988 6,005 7,986 62,007 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 (6,212) (9,674) 1,789 6,479 (14,364) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 (50,753) (60,500) 9,702 32,336 (83,134) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 (22,520) (28,784) 7,282 17,766 (39,268) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 13,403 19,802 9,665 9,586 19,881 312 LLMD 2014-1 18,548 31,667 16,726 16,562 31,831 313 LLMD 2014-3 7,890 11,402 8,442 8,413 11,431 314 LLMD 2014-4 10,180 15,525 4,120 3,994 15,651 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 (654) 7,179 11,914 4,163 14,930 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 255,799 295,932 93,435 36,359 353,008 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 53,197 76,569 50,611 34,870 92,310 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 52,480 24,598 99,652 155,656 (31,406) 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL 14,937 20,544 4,793 7,798 17,539 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/Zone A (2,191) 1,817 4,700 5,818 699 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/Zone B 13,087 64,667 61,569 30,644 95,592 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/Zone C 272 8,521 10,043 11,535 7,029 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/Zone D (2,374) 8,932 15,012 14,857 9,087 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/Zone F 26,624 40,039 10,355 12,500 37,894 409 LMD 2001-1 Zone G 1,717 2,332 1,216 533 3,015 410 LMD 2001-1 Zone S 2,089 2,414 1,612 1,229 2,797 411 LMD 2001-1 Zone W 14,079 10,585 130 7,853 2,863 412 LMD 2001-2 Zone A 45,807 53,181 13,848 12,350 54,679 413 LMD 2001-2 Zone B 23,568 32,007 11,286 12,613 30,680 414 LMD 2001-2 Zone C 1,293 1,695 647 840 1,502 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 21 566

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Interim Financial Report | QUARTER ONE ending June 30, 2023 | 3 months Available Resources Summary
Audited Fund
Balance
Audited Fund
Balance
Amended
Revenue Budget
Amended
Expenditure
Budget
Estimated
Available Fund
Balance
Fund Name & Type 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2023-24 6/30/2024 415 LMD 2001-2 Zone D 15,432 21,229 7,505 8,463 20,271 416 LMD 2001-2 Zone F 2,600 3,881 2,550 2,508 3,923 417 LMD 2001-2 Zone G 24,870 30,389 8,477 9,368 29,499 418 LMD 2001-2 Zone H 35,195 49,308 18,752 21,816 46,244 419 LMD 2001-2 Zone J 24,278 32,474 12,670 14,512 30,632 420 LMD 2001-2 Zone K 1,117 1 1,898 3,523 (1,624) 421 LMD 2001-2 Zone M 1,942 3,352 1,611 2,081 2,882 422 LMD 2001-3 Zone A (14,920) (7,167) 13,363 5,705 491 423 LMD 2001-3 Zone B (3,135) 3,447 8,051 4,275 7,223 424 LMD 2001-3 Zone C 21,467 27,092 3,979 2,834 28,237 425 LMD 2001-3 Zone D 43,417 54,664 7,911 6,394 56,181 426 LMD 2001-3 Zone E 95,124 119,981 19,736 14,136 125,581 427 LMD 2001-3 Zone F 37,754 51,278 3,458 1,078 53,658 428 LMD 2001-3 Zone G 1,054 4,574 6,717 4,163 7,128 429 LMD 2001-3 Zone H 14,303 17,407 3,374 3,561 17,220 430 LMD 2001-3 Zone I 55,862 77,850 23,283 27,395 73,738 431 LMD 2001-3 Zone J 15,985 22,502 6,683 7,748 21,437 432 LMD 2001-3 Zone K 15,442 21,876 7,736 11,873 17,739 433 LMD 2001-3 Zone L 17,038 25,028 7,957 9,048 23,937 434 LMD 2001-3 Zone M 52,240 68,510 13,898 11,021 71,387 435 LMD 2001-3 Zone N 33,391 46,824 19,394 35,908 30,310 436 LMD 2001-3 Zone O 6,257 8,069 1,354 959 8,464 437 LMD 2001-3 Zone P 36,662 46,173 7,223 5,015 48,381 438 LMD 2001-3 Zone Q 14,505 17,749 3,247 2,620 18,376 439 LMD 2001-3 Zone R 1,628 2,512 1,020 1,354 2,178 440 LMD 2001-3 Zone S 7,075 9,072 1,495 1,085 9,482 441 LMD 2001-3 Zone T 54,380 68,318 10,374 7,165 71,527 442 LMD 2001-3 Zone U 35,606 37,299 7,639 5,517 39,421 443 LMD 2001-3 Zone V 60,262 74,167 11,767 8,689 77,245 444 LMD 2001-3 Zone W 18,405 23,122 8,300 3,448 27,974 445 LMD 2001-3 Zone X 5,245 6,779 1,176 871 7,084 446 LMD 2001-3 Zone Y 8,765 11,143 1,845 1,348 11,640 447 LMD 2001-3 Zone Z 9,695 12,364 2,024 1,454 12,934 448 LMD 2001-3 Zone AA 6,136 7,965 1,399 1,116 8,248 449 LMD 2001-3 Zone BB 5,743 7,406 1,147 834 7,719 450 LMD 2001-3 Zone CC 21,073 28,214 9,820 11,359 26,675 451 LMD 2001-3 Zone DD 48,052 63,155 13,161 10,475 65,841 452 LMD 2001-3 Zone EE 23,315 28,893 15,074 4,094 39,873 453 LMD 2001-3 Zone FF 27,284 38,456 11,643 11,121 38,978 454 LMD 2001-3 Zone GG 14,635 18,572 2,996 2,131 19,437 455 LMD 2001-3 Zone HH 11,733 14,892 2,443 1,812 15,523 456 LMD 2001-3 Zone II 26,369 33,230 5,089 3,605 34,714 457 LMD 2001-3 Zone JJ 4,707 6,076 1,032 759 6,349 458 LMD 2001-3 Zone KK 1,620 (42) 1,685 3,887 (2,244) 459 LMD 2001-3 Zone LL 10,208 8,196 2,119 1,592 8,723 460 LMD 2001-3 Zone MM 7,428 10,197 2,867 3,109 9,955 461 LMD 2001-3 Zone NN 18,180 22,906 3,641 2,633 23,914 462 LMD 2001-3 Zone OO 17,875 22,379 3,774 2,928 23,225 463 LMD 2001-3 Zone PP 20,973 25,579 4,200 3,460 26,319 464 LMD 2001-3 Zone QQ 8,196 10,527 1,884 1,454 10,957 465 LMD 2001-3 Zone RR 54,592 68,574 11,395 7,623 72,346 466 LMD 2001-3 Zone SS 20,354 25,601 4,148 3,097 26,652 467 LMD 2001-3 Zone TT 8,607 10,682 1,834 1,592 10,924 468 LMD 2001-3 Zone UU 6,717 8,652 1,314 953 9,013 469 LMD 2001-3 Zone VV 5,555 6,907 2,306 1,166 8,047 470 LMD 2001-3 Zone WW 23,361 29,491 4,851 3,423 30,919 471 LMD 2001-3 Zone XX 3,147 3,937 2,760 1,755 4,942 472 LMD 2001-3 Zone YY 24,511 34,611 10,864 12,951 32,524 473 LMD 2001-3 Zone ZZ 10,479 13,262 2,176 1,517 13,921 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 22 567

DEBT SERVICE FUND
500 General Debt Service Fund -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL Debt Service Fund - - - - -

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
600 General Capital Projects Fund 2,908,958$ 11,052,878$ 10,491,412$ 15,336,320$ 6,207,970$ 601 General Information Technology Capital Replaceme - 553,652 50,000 - 603,652 602 General Fleet Capital Replacement Fund - 240,000 120,000 - 360,000 603 General Street Maintenance Capital Fund - 500,000 500,000 - 1,000,000 604 General Facility Maintenance Capital Fund - 250,000 250,000 - 500,000 605 General Catch Basin & Storm Drain Maintenance Ca - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 TOTAL Capital Projects Fund 2,908,958 12,696,530 11,511,412 15,336,320 8,871,622

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
700 Information Technology Internal Service Fund -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL Internal Service Funds - - - - - TOTAL 135,003,739$ 184,102,017$ 95,159,455$ 113,799,129$ 165,462,343$ City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 23 568

GENERAL FUND - FUND BALANCE RESERVES AND COMMITMENTS
Total General Fund Estimated Fund Balance at 06/30/2024 147,662,742$ Nonspendable (Per 06/30/2023 ACFR):

Prepaid Items -
Total Nonspendable Fund Balance -
Restricted:

Restricted Fund Balance -
Total Restricted Fund Balance -
Assigned:

Emergency Contingency (50% of Adopted Operating Appropriations) 16,730,508 Cash flow for CIP Grants 29,500,000
Cover Special Revenue Fund Negative Fund Balance 219,066 Business Incentive Loan Program 300,000
Total Assigned Reserves 46,749,574
Committed:

Facility Construction: City Hall 33,000,000
Facility Construction: Library 10,000,000
Facility Construction: Police Substation 8,000,000
Pension Liability (CalPERS Reserve) 2,000,000
Equipment Purchase, Fire Truck 1,500,000
Public Safety Rate Increase Stabilization 1,000,000
Total Committed Reserves 55,500,000
Committed Appropriations Limit Qualified Capital Outlay Reserve:

General Fund: Facility Construction: City Hall - Appropriations Limit 20,420,029 General Fund: Facility Construction: Library - Appropriations Limit 17,595,000 Total Appropriations Limit Committed Reserves 38,015,029 Total General Funds Estimated Unassigned Fund Balance at 06/30/2024 7,398,139$

RESTRICTED STRUCTURAL FIRE FUND - FUND BALANCE RESERVES AND COMMITMENTS Total Fire Funds Estimated Fund Balance at 06/30/2024 16,681,301$ Assigned:

Emergency Contingency (75% of Adopted Operating Appropriations) 5,915,138 Facility Construction: Third Fire Station 2,000,000
Total Assigned Reserves 7,915,138
Committed:

Facility Construction: Third Fire Station 8,000,000
Equipment Purchase: Apparatus Replacement Reserve 400,000 Total Committed Reserves 8,400,000
Total Fire Funds Estimated Unassigned Fund Balance at 06/30/2024 366,164$ Restricted by the County of Riverside (Per 06/30/2023 ACFR):

Restricted Fund Balance 16,875,651
Total Restricted Fund Balance 16,875,651
**For the purpose of this schedule, budgetary fund balance is estimated. Estimated fund balance in the far right column is defined as revenues minus expenditures. For the city's two major funds, fund balance is further broken down by the five categories of fund balance, nonspendable, restricted, assigned, committed, and unassigned located in the bottom portion of the schedule. Adequate fund balance is available in the General Fund to cover any negative fund balances in the city's reimbursable grant funds and special financing district funds.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 24 569

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Annual Operating Budget
Appropriations Limit Summary
Pre Voter
Approved
Override
Voter
Approved
Override
Post Voter
Approved
Override
Post Voter
Approved
Override
Post Voter
Approved
Override
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24

ADOPTED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
Adopted Appropriations Limit 21,455,814$ 23,077,364$ 24,418,797$ 25,794,921$ 33,000,000$ 35,473,578$ 39,253,023$ 40,991,901$ Subject Revenue Appropriations
General Fund 10,045,447 15,809,535 17,472,985 17,952,129 41,516,698 54,973,760 53,493,923 58,427,813 Fire Fund 5,055,030 5,346,150 6,285,042 6,406,287 6,406,287 7,298,931 7,785,000 8,400,000 Total Subject Revenue Appropriation 15,100,477 21,155,685 23,758,027 24,358,416 47,922,985 62,272,691 61,278,923 66,827,813 Over(Under) Limit (6,355,337) (1,921,679) (660,770) (1,436,505) 14,922,985 26,799,113 22,025,900 25,835,912 AB137 Provision Calculation 25,152,570
Annual Available for Capital Outlay 14,922,985 26,799,113 22,025,900 683,342 Cumulative Available for Capital Outlay 41,722,098 22,025,900 683,342 Cumulative Available for Capital Outlay Expenditures and Reserves 41,722,098 22,025,900 683,342 FY2021-22 Adopted Capital Outlay Reserve Commitments
General Fund: Facility Construction City Hall - Appropriations Limit 18,399,529 General Fund: Facility Construction Library - Appropriations Limit 10,595,000 General Fund: Limonite Gap Bridge - Appropriations Limit 2,500,000 General Fund: Equipment, Fire Truck Purchase - Appropriations Limit 1,500,000 General Fund: Facility, Fire Station 27 Storage Facility - Appropriations Limit 2,000,000 Subtotal Capital Outlay Reserve Commitments 34,994,529 0 0 0 FY2021-22 Adopted Capital Outlay Expenditures
Streetlight Debt Pay-Off - Appropriations Limit 4,168,519 Goodman Commerce Infrastructure Developer Agreement Pay-Off - Appropriation 2,559,050 Subtotal Capital Outlay Expenditure Budget 6,727,569 0 0 0 FY2022-23 Proposed Reserve Commitments
General Fund: Facility Construction City Hall - Appropriations Limit 5,545,900 General Fund: Facility Construction Library - Appropriations Limit 7,000,000 Subtotal Capital Outlay Reserve Commitments 12,545,900
FY2022-23 Proposed Capital Outlay Expenditures
93026: Appropriation from Reserve: Limonite Gap Bridge 2,500,000 93026: Limonite Gap Bridge 4,525,000
95001: Hamner Place 700,000
94012: Prado Dam Inundation Utlity Mitigation 155,000
95011: Facility Construction City Hall 3,100,000
95018: Modular Offices 800,000
93035: I-15 Corridor Landscaping 200,000
Subtotal Capital Outlay Expenditure Budget 2,500,000 9,480,000 FY2023-24 Proposed Reserve Commitments
General Fund: Facility Construction City Hall - Appropriations Limit (3,525,400) General Fund: Limonite Gap Bridge - Appropriations Limit (2,500,000) General Fund: Equipment, Fire Truck Purchase - Appropriations Limit Release (1,500,000) General Fund: Facility, Fire Station 27 Storage Facility - Appropriations Limit Release (2,000,000) Subtotal Capital Outlay Reserve Commitments (2,500,000) (7,025,400) FY2021-22
Commitments
and
Expenditures
FY2022-23
Appropriations
From Reserve
FY2022-23
Commitments
and
Expenditures
FY2023-24
Commitments
and
Expenditures
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 25 570

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Annual Operating Budget
Appropriations Limit Summary
FY2023-24 Proposed Capital Outlay Expenditures
95011: Facility Construction City Hall 7,025,400
93026: Limonite Gap Bridge MSHCP Fees 473,750
95018: Modular Offices 209,592
Subtotal Capital Outlay Expenditure Budget 7,708,742
Remaining Appropriations Limit Surplus 0 0 0 0
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 26 571

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Annual Operating Budget
Sales Tax Summary
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 2023-24 Quarter 2018-19 2019-20** 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 Budget Quarter 1 2,454,597 2,986,937 2,873,677 10,585,289 11,716,157 12,553,129 46,250,000 Quarter 2 # 2,693,017 2,807,803 3,144,645 12,241,575 13,047,245 3,846,928 Quarter 3 2,129,355 2,272,291 10,892,874 10,836,091 10,173,170 Quarterly Quarter 4 2,332,606 2,281,948 11,208,862 11,047,330 12,419,799 - Budget:

TOTAL Sale 9,609,575 10,348,979 28,120,058 44,710,286 47,356,371 16,400,058 11,562,500 **Sales tax for quarter 1 2019-20 included a late payment from the state applicable to prior quarters, this timing issue is the result of a state software system conversion. As a result, the amounts for quarter 1 2019-20 appear higher than normal.

NOTE: Sales tax figures represent sales tax receipts applicable to the quarters indicated. Amounts may not have been actually received in the quarter indicated, these totals may not be represented in other summary reports included in this report. Figures for recent quarters may not be complete. # The true up for Quarter 2 ending December 31, 2020 has not been received as of the publish date of this report. It was included in the FY2021-22 budget. Per HdL there is no estimated delivery date for the true up payment, as a result, the true up is not budgeted in the current year.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 27 572

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.14
January 24, 2024
Congressional Community Project Funding Request Support Le*er for the New Eastvale Library
Prepared By:

Alexander Fung, Economic Development Manager
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve a le
er supporng the submi
al of a FY 2024-2025
$4 million Congressional Community Project Funding Request for the new Eastvale Library.

Summary
Formerly known as “earmarks,” Community Project Funding (CPF) requests are provisions inserted into a federal appropriaon or budget bill that directs funds to a speciﬁc recipient for a designated project. Each Senator and Congressmember has a diﬀerent request submission procedure for CPF requests. According to congressional staffers, each CPF request should not exceed $4 million.

Congresswoman Norma Torres recently began solicing CPF requests from cies, community organizaons, and nonproﬁts for FY 2024-2025. A9er consulng with the Congresswoman’s Oﬃce, staﬀ submi
ed a $4 million CPF request to support the development of the new Eastvale Library. It is recommended that the City Council approve a le
er (A
achment 1) supporng the CPF request to
demonstrate support.

Background
The new Eastvale Library is part of the Civic Center’s development, which is located within Congresswoman Torres’ district. While Congressmembers typically set CPF request deadlines to be around March or April of each year, Congresswoman Torres released her FY 2024-2025 CPF call-for- requests early to provide addional me for interested applicants to prepare materials and obtain support letters. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
573

All CPF requests must show demonstrated evidence of community support via news articles, support letters, or media stories. Awards funds must be obligated within 12 months of funding allocation.

The new Eastvale Library is an economic development project that is eligible to receive congressional CPF funds under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Soon a9er the Congresswoman’s Oﬃce conﬁrmed that the Eastvale Library is an eligible CPF project, staﬀ submi
ed a $4 million request to the Congresswoman on October 16, 2023. The submi ed
application can be found in Attachment 2.

Despite that the CPF applicaon was submi
ed in October 2023, the City can connue to obtain
addional le
ers of support from stakeholders and share the le
ers with the Congresswoman’s
Oﬃce unl the end of March 2024. To date, the City received le ers of support from State Senator
Richard Roth, Assemblymember Bill Essayli, Riverside County Supervisor Karen Spiegel, California Bapst University, City of Jurupa Valley, Corona-Norco Uniﬁed School District, California State University at San Bernardino, Eastvale Chamber of Commerce, Jurupa Uniﬁed School District, and Riverside County Oﬃce of Economic Development. These le ers of support can be found in the
a
achments. The Congresswoman’s Oﬃce has also recommended the City Council to approve and submit a letter to demonstrate additional support.

The Congresswoman’s Oﬃce is ancipated to announce the awarded CPF projects in Fall 2024.

Should the Eastvale Library be awarded CPF funds, the City can choose to accept or reject the award offer.

Earlier in April 2023, staﬀ also submi
ed a grant request in the amount of $10 million to the
California State Library’s Building Forward Library Facilies Improvement Program for the Eastvale Library. Unfortunately, the applicaon was not selected to receive funding due to limited funds. The State informed city staﬀ that the Governor and the California Legislature have promised that an addional $100 million in funds will be allocated between 2024 and 2026 to fund Building Forward projects that were not selected in the 2023 round.

Environmental
Pursuant to Secon 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, organizaonal or administrave acvies of governments that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment are not considered as CEQA projects.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 1
| Target #: E
| Goal #: A
The submission of the CPF request can lead to possible award funds for the Eastvale Library. This supports the development and construction of a Civic Center in Downtown Eastvale.

Fiscal Impact
The submission of a CPF applicaon and the approval of a support le er do not result in direct ﬁscal
impacts. Should the CPF applicaon be selected for an award, the City can choose to accept or reject the award offer.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
The City Council previously adopted a resoluon to authorize the submi al of a grant applicaon to 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
574
the California State Library’s Building Forward Library Facilies Improvement Program on April 26, 2023.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Draft City Council Letter of Support for the CPF Request

Attachment 2 - Submitted CPF Application
Attachment 3 - Received CPF Request Letters of Support (As of January 24, 2024) 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
575

January 24, 2024

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

RE: SUPPORT FOR THE CITY OF EASTVALE’S $4,000,000 COMMUNITY PROJECT FUNDING REQUEST FOR

THE EASTVALE LIBRARY

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

The Eastvale City Council hereby expresses our utmost support for the City of Eastvale’s $4 million Community Project Funding (CPF) request to support the construction of the Eastvale Library. The City currently contracts with the Riverside County Library System, which operates a library branch at the Eleanor Roosevelt High School (ERHS) campus in Eastvale. Due to the library’s current location, public access is limited to only after-school hours. Library staff also experience challenges in launching new programs and activities due to the limited space available, as the library space is shared with the ERHS.

The new Eastvale Library will be constructed as part of the Eastvale Civic Center Project at the corner of Hamner Avenue and Limonite Avenue. The new facility will be available for longer hours, house additional resources, and serve as a large educational hub for the Inland Empire community. This project will create a permanent location for library services that are accessible to both Eastvale residents and the surrounding community.

The lack of a permanent library impacts Eastvale residents’ access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. We hope that the Congresswoman’s Office will provide favorable consideration to this request and we sincerely appreciate the Congresswoman for providing an opportunity for the City to submit the CPF request. Questions and inquiries regarding the request can be directed to the City’s Economic Development Manager, Alexander Fung, at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Christian Dinco Michael McMinn Clint Lorimore
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember

Todd Rigby Jocelyn Yow
Councilmember Councilmember
576
1 Alexander Fung
From: Google Forms <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 3:25 PM
To: Alexander Fung
Subject: Rep. Norma Torres FY25 Appropriations Form - Community Project Funds [The e-mail below is from an external source. Please do not open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.]

Thanks for filling out Rep. Norma Torres FY25 Appropriations Form - Community Project Funds
Here's what was received.

Rep. Norma Torres FY25 Appropriations Form -
Community Project Funds
* Please fill out the entire form. If you have previously communicated with our office about a submissions request via an email, call, or meeting, we ask that you still fill out the form.

*NOTE: To answer many of these questions you will need to review Committee guidance, for example looking through the guidance to see which subcommittee/account you are eligible for. You can locate previous guidance here.

*The deadline for Agricultural and Interior submissions is XXX. *The deadline for all other submissions is XXX.

* You will need to fill out the Google form in one sitting, as your information will not save. We recommend filling out the form in Word before submitting via the Google form. You can email [email protected] to acquire a copy of the form in Word, but you must use this form for your final submission.

* For multiple requests: If you have multiple requests, submit a form separately for each request.

Email *
577
2 [email protected]

Thank you for your interest in submitting an appropriations request for FY2025. Please answer the following questions, broken up into the following sections:

Section 1. Requesting Entity / Organization Information Section 2. Point of Contact
Section 3. Request Overview
Section 4. Project Details
Sections 4A-E. Additional Project Questions
Section 5. Funding Request
Section 6. Leadership Point of Contact
Section 1. Requesting Entity / Organization Information

1. Requesting entity/organization name (use legal name) * City of Eastvale

2. Type of entity (non-profit, university, government; note: for-profits are ineligible ) * Local Government

3. EIN ( This is your Employee Identification Number that identifies your business for tax purposes). If not applicable, write N/A. *
27-3240221

3. Full street address *
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752
578
3 4. Phone number *
(626) 463-8439

5. Would you like to subscribe to the Community Project Funding Newsletter? * Yes
No
Section 2. Point of Contact
This is the point person at your organization who our staff may contact regarding this request.

6. Name of point of contact *
Alexander Fung

7. Title within organization *
Economic Development Manager

8. Phone number *
(626) 463-8439

9. Email address *
[email protected]

10. Time Zone *
Pacific Time
579
4 Section 3. Request Overview

11. Short title of the request *
Eastvale Library and Innovation Center

12. Project Address (What is the physical location where the funds will be used?) * 12740 58th St, Eastvale, CA 92880

13. Suggest a clear and simple 1-sentence description of the request * Requesting $4 million to support the building of a new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center, which will replace the existing 6,270 sq. ft. facility that is currently located in the Eleanor Roosevelt High School.

14. Subcommittee / Which Appropriations Bill *
Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Commerce, Justice, Science
Defense
Energy & Water Development
Financial Services General Government
Homeland Security
Interior & Environment
Labor, Health and Human Services, Education
Military Construction and VA
Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development

15. Which Agency within that Subcommittee? *
Department of Housing and Urban Development
580
5 16. Which Account? (Please note that some accounts require matching or cost share funding from non-federal sources. Please check with our office if you have questions.) * CDBG - Economic and Development Initiatives

17. I affirm that no other Representatives or Senators are receiving this request. * Yes, no other office will receive this request.

No, we already applied to another office.

18. Priority number of this request (if submitting multiple requests) 1 Section 3F. Additional Questions for Transportation Projects 1F. Does the project require an environmental review?
Yes.
2F. What is the status of the NEPA category of action, if applicable (e.g., Categorical Exclusion, Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Statement)? NEPA analysis is in progress.
3F. If the project requires an environmental review, what is the status and/or outcome of the environmental review?
NEPA analysis is in progress.
4F. Type of project
581
6 Bridge
Highway
Transit / transit rail new start
Bike / Pedestrian
Intermodal facility (passenger)
Intermodal facility (freight)
Bus, bus equipment, or bus facility
Other: Library
5F. Where is the project in the construction process?
Planning and Environmental Review
Final Design
Right of Way
Capital purchase or lease (including bus purchases)
Construction
Other:
6F. Does the project intend to apply for any DOT discretionary programs before proceeding? If yes, will the project sponsor still proceed if not selected? No.
7F. Was the project on a State, tribal or territorial Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) or a metropolitan transportation improvement plan (MTIP) as of 12/31/2023? If yes, please provide a link to the plan.

No.
582
7 8F. Please provide the State, Tribal, or territorial transportation improvement program (STIP) ID number or metropolitan transportation improvement program (TIP) ID Number and specify which plan the ID number comes from.

No.
9F. Attach documentation that the project is on STIP or TIP as well.

No files submitted
10F. If applicable, please provide a description of the process that has been or will be followed to provide an opportunity for public comment on the project. 2 community meetings were held in partnership with the Eastvale Library and the Eastvale Kiwanis Club earlier this year to obtain feedback on the new Library and Innovation Center. Additionally, city staff assembled a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) that included 16 residents and stakeholders to provide feedback on the new Library, new City Hall, and new Police Station. The CAC met between May 2023 and October 2023 to provide feedback on the design and construction of these buildings.

Section 4. Project Details

18. Provide a project description (Max 150 words) *
In partnership with the Riverside County Library System and the Riverside County Office of Economic Development, the City of Eastvale is leading the design and construction of a new 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center as part of the Civic Center Project at the corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenues in Eastvale, CA. The new facility will be the first true library in the City for an underserved community of young and diverse residents. The project’s expected benefits include additional operating hours, additional space to accommodate programs, and additional equipment that can expand access to literacy and digital programs.

19. Please describe, with as much specificity as possible, the overall goals and objectives of the proposed project. *
Eastvale is the second youngest city in California and one of the fastest growing cities in the state over the past several years. Its only existing library is a small 6,270 sq. ft. facility that is shared with Eleanor Roosevelt High School (ERHS). Due to the lack of space and the facility’s shared usage, the current Eastvale Library can only accommodate limited operating hours, programming, and number of staff. The current facility is consistently overcrowded because it can only operate outside of school hours from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Mondays through 583
8 Thursdays, 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Fridays, and 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. A total of four staff members are responsible for maintaining the library’s operations and implementing programs. The facility houses only six computers and shares crafting and sorting spaces with ERHS. The facility’s only office, which is reserved for the library’s manager, is mostly used as storage space. The new facility will provide the resources and space needed to address these needs, as well as furthering its purpose to provide free and equal access to information, inspire independent learning, and promote long-term societal benefits through the transmission and discovery of knowledge. The new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center will replace the existing 6,270 sq. ft. facility with a new 25,000 sq. ft. facility, thereby quadrupling in size from the current facility. This will allow the library to have additional office, storage, sorting, and activity spaces and additional staff. More importantly, moving the library to a new facility would imply that the facility would no longer be shared with ERHS, allowing the new library to increase its operating hours. Additionally, the additional space would allow the library to increase the number of computers, restrooms, and meeting rooms. There will also be space to accommodate study rooms, children’s area, and self- checkout kiosks. The new facility is planned to have two floors where children, teen, and adult areas will be expanded to accommodate lounge and stage areas and spaces for multilingual programs, including multi-lingual story time and multi-cultural events. These are heavily demanded by current library visitors as there are large numbers of Mandarin, Korean, Hindi, and Spanish speakers utilizing the library on a weekly basis. Furthermore, the new library will be constructed at the new Eastvale Civic Center, allowing the new facility to utilize outdoor spaces for educational programs.

20. Provide an explanation of the request, including an explanation of why this is a good use of taxpayer funds and how this project will benefit CA-35. (Max 250 words) * The $4 million request will support the new facility's energy-efficient building envelope. This amount will cover expenses such as energy-efficient insulation, wall finishes, and exterior facades that can provide long-term cost savings through reducing energy consumption and enhancing thermal comfort. This amount includes design, material purchase, and construction costs. The establishment of the new facility provides both local and regional benefits, as the facility provides a stronger literacy environment along with assisting individuals to be more informed about their health, employment, and family decisions. The facility will play a more essential role in the Inland Empire by providing access to information and resources, supporting literacy and education, promoting lifelong learning, and serving as a community gathering space.

21. Who would use your project, and how would you inform them? * Eastvale residents, students, businesses, visitors, and stakeholders would be able to benefit from the new facility.

City staff and the City Council have been actively raising awareness about the new Downtown Eastvale Project, which includes the construction of the new library. The project is highly anticipated by the community. Once completed, announcements will be widely shared with the community to engage residents and visitors to utilize the new facility.

22. Please describe the current developmental status of this project. Is this a new or ongoing project? *
584
9 The project is currently under design. This is an ongoing project.

23. What is the estimated start date of the project? (mm/dd/yy) * Planning for the new library facility began in 2022. The estimated start date was 05/22/22.

24. What is the estimated completion date of the project? (mm/dd/yy) * 03/31/2027

25. Please list and attach any letters of support. DO NOT EMAIL. To provide ATTACHMENTS, please add them in the next question.

Letters of support can include: (1) letters of support from elected community leaders, (2) press articles highlighting the need for the requested community project funding, (3) letters of support from school boards or other community organizations (4) resolutions passed by city councils or boards, or (5) other compelling evidence of community support).
*
Attachments include letters of support from the Riverside County Library System, Eastvale Kiwanis Club, and Senator Richard Roth. The minutes from the community workshops showcase various suggestions for the new library, proving that the community is excited about the new facility's development.

26. Attached documents demonstrating community support. Must be PDF.

Google Forms only allows 10 attachments max. If you have more letters, please email [email protected].
*
Submitted files
585
10 Letter of Support - Eastvale Kiwanis Club - Alexander Fung.pdf

Letter of Support - Riverside County Library System - Alexander Fung.PDF

Letter of Support - Senator Richard Roth - Alexander Fung.pdf

Other Document - Community Workshop Minutes - Alexander Fung.pdf

27. Please provide the oversight and management structure for the Community Project, including accountability measures and performance standards to evaluate whether the program or project supported by the funds meets its mission. *
The Eastvale City Council will be responsible for overseeing the development of the new facility. The project is equally managed by the City's Public Works and Community Development Departments under the oversight of the City Manager. The City's Finance Department will diligently monitor the use of the funds to ensure that the funds meet the mission.

Section 5. Funding Request

28. What is the requested dollar amount for this project for fiscal year 2024? * $4,000,000

29. What is the total cost to complete the project? *
$33,000,000

30. Provide detailed budget information as to how the funding is anticipated to be spent. * The City has budgeted $29 million and they are currently located in the City’s construction reserve. According to the City’s Strategic Plan, developing and constructing a Civic Center, which includes the new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center, is ranked as one of the Priority “Level 1” goals. As a result, city staff has been diligently setting aside funds in the City’s General Fund to prepare for the new Civic Center’s development for the past several years.

Based on numbers and analyses provided by Griffin Structures, design and construction for the new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center would cost a total of $33 million. This amount includes contingencies for the project. For the past several years, city staff have assigned $29 million in the General Fund reserve to plan for the new facility’s development. Although staff intends to change the reserve to a debt reserve based on the City’s financial plan, if the 586
11 grant is awarded the matching funds will be assigned to a construction reserve and utilized to pay construction invoices or debt service. With the support of a $4 million grant, the project would be fully funded.

Budget Breakdown: Please submit an excel sheet in PDF itemizing use of funds. * Submitted files

Cost Analysis - Alexander Fung.pdf

31. Can the project obligate all of the requested funds by no later than 12 months after the enactment of the Appropriations Act? *
Yes
No

32. Will the funds go to an organization that will make sub-grants of those funds to other organizations? [yes/no] If yes, please list the sub-grantees. * No.

33. Pleased provide a history of funding for the project, including Federal, state, or local government; non-profit; or corporate. (Include both formula funds and any discretionary grants and fiscal years.

Include whether any of these funds came from this specific federal account in the past ten years, and if so, what fiscal years and for what purposes.) *
The City has budgeted $29 million and they are currently located in the City’s construction reserve. No other grants have been received to date.

34. If matching or cost share funds are required, please note the source, amount, and timeline for receipt of those funds.

While matching funds are not required, $29 million of the $33 million have been budgeted in the City's General Fund. 587
12 35. How much, if anything, is being requested for this particular project in the Administration’s FY24 budget request?
$4,000,000

36. If the Appropriations Committee is not able to provide the full amount of funding requested, can this project start in a limited capacity and spend a smaller amount of appropriated funds within 12 months of the enactment of the Appropriations Act? *
Yes
No

37. Have you been in receipt of previous Community Project funding? Is so, what project received the funds, and where was it located? *
No.

Section 6. Leadership Point of Contact
If your project is chosen, the Congresswoman calls a member of your leadership team to share the good news.

38. Name of the Leadership Member *
Mark Orme

39. Position *
City Manager

40. Preferred Phone Number *
(951) 703-4424
588
13 41. Please list any ongoing lawsuits to which the applicant or anyone on its executive leadership team is a party. Please list any crimes for which the applicant or anyone on its executive leadership team has been indicted or found guilty of. Do you know of any reason why your organization should not receive federal funds? *
None.

Create your own Google Form
Report Abuse

589

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR EASTVALE LIBRARY AND INNOVATION CENTER

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

I write to express my utmost support for the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The City currently contracts with the County of Riverside Library System which operates a location on the Eleanor Roosevelt High School (ERHS) campus in Eastvale. Due to the library’s current location, public access is limited to only after school hours. The new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center, which will be constructed in Downtown Eastvale at the corner of Hamner Avenue and Limonite Avenue, will be available for longer hours, house additional resources, and will serve as an educational hub within the city. The project will create a permanent location for library services accessible to both Eastvale residents and the surrounding community.

The City of Eastvale plans to contract with local college institutions to provide satellite classes and services at the library’s state-of-the-art innovation center. This will positively impact the Inland Empire Region by providing access to library resources as well as advanced education opportunities.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. I hereby express my strongest support for the City of Ea stvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft.

Library and Innovation Center. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my Chief of Staff Shawn Lewis at [email protected].

Respectfully,

Assemblymember Bill Essayli
California State Legislature, Assembly District 63

590
591

COMMITTEESCAPITOL OFFICE
1021 O STREET
SUITE 7510
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
TEL 19161 651-4031
FAX (9161 651-4931
BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS a

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CHAIRdaltfornta Renats GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION
HEALTH
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE #3

ON HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES
BUDGET a FISCAL REVIEW

SELECT COMMITTEE ON

CAREER TECHNOLOGY AND

THE NEW ECONOMY
CHAIR

SELECT COMMITTEE ON

MANUFACTURED HOME

COMMUNITIES
CHAIR

SENATOR
RICHARD D. ROTH

THIRTY-FIRST DISTRICT

DISTRICT OFFICES
3737 MAIN STREET
SUITE 104
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
TEL 1951 I 680-6750
FAX (951 ) 680-6757
8353 SIERRA AVENUE
SUITE 142
FONTANA, CA 92335
TEL(909)574-4120
FAX(909)574-4132
i
SENATOR,ROTHfe'SENATE CA GOV
December 13. 2023
The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office IBuilding
Washington. DC 20515
RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE’S LIBRARY

AND INNOVATION CENTER
Dear Congresswoman Torres;
1 write in strong support for funding the construction of a $33M. 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center (FTdC) in the City of Eastvale.

Before its incoiporation in 2010. the City of Eastvale was predominantly dairy farms and agricultural land. But since that time it has been one of the fastest growing cities in the region with over 71.000 residents according to the 2021 Census. The families that have Hocked to Eastvale deserve to have their own dedicated library. The City currently contracts with the County of Riverside's Library System, which operates a location on the Eleanor Roosevelt High School campus in Eastvale. Due to the library's current location, public access is limited to only after school hours. The new' ELIC, which will be constructed in Dow'ntown Eastvale, at the corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenues, will be much more accessible to the residents with longer hours, additional resources, and serve as an educational hub within the city.
'fhe ELIC will create a permanent location for library services accessible to both Eastvale residents and the surrounding community. The City of Eastvale plans to contract with local college institutions to provide satellite classes and services at the library's state-of-the-art innovation center. This will positively affect Inland Southern California by providing access to library resources as well as advanced education opportunities. It is time for the residents of Eastvale to have their own full-time, dedicated library which will enhance their daily quality of life.

As you well know, local libraries are an integral part of a community’s identity and fabric.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding my strong support.

Sincerely,
\C7
RICHARD D. ROTH
Senator, 3L' District
592
593
Board of Education
Jose W. Lalas, Ph.D. Stacy Nicola Bill Pollock Chris Raahauge Mary Helen Ybarra

2820 CLARK AVENUE • NORCO, CA 92860 -1903 • (951) 736 -5000 • www.cnusd.k12.ca.us December 13, 2023

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR EASTVALE LIBRARY AND INNOVATION CENTER

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

I write to express my utmost support for the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The City currently contracts with the County of Riverside Library System which operates a location on the Eleanor Roosevelt High School (ERHS) campus in Eastvale. Due to the library’s current location, public access is limited to only after school hours. T he new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center, which will be constructed in Downtown Eastvale at the corner of Hamner Avenue and Limonite Avenue, will be available for longer hours, house additional resources, and will serve as an educational hub within the city. The project will create a permanent location for library services accessible to both Eastvale residents and the surrounding community.

The City of Eastvale plans to contract with local college institutions to provide satellite classes and services at the library’s state -of-the-art innovation center. This will positively impact the Inland Empire Region by providing access to library resources as well as advanced education opportunities.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. The Corona-Norco Unified School District hereby expresses our strongest support for the City of Eastvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected].

Respectfully,

Christopher Raahauge
President, Board of Education

Samuel Buenrostro, Ed.D., Superintendent
(951) 736-5010
Lisa Simon, Ed.D., Deputy Superintendent
Educational Services (951) 736-5080
Dalia Gadelmawla, Asst. Superintendent
Business Services (951) 736-5035
Glen A. Gonsalves, Asst. Superintendent
Human Resources (951) 736 -5064
Ben Odipo, PMP, Asst. Superintendent
Information Technology (951) 736-5190
Reggie Thompkins, Ed.D., Asst. Superintendent
Instructional Support (951) 736-5111
Evita Tapia-Gonzalez, Chief of Communications
Executive Services (951) 736 -5003
Jeremy Goins, Ed.D., Exec. Dir. of Development
Executive Services (951) 736 -5010
594

December 8, 2023

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Re: Letter of Support for Eastvale Library and Innovation Center

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

On behalf of the California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB), I write to express our utmost support for the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. CSUSB hereby expresses our strongest support for the City of Eastvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Marisa Yeager, Associate Vice President for Government & Community Relations at (909) 537-5630 or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Tomás D. Morales
President

595

12523 Limonite Ave, Suite 440-428. Eastvale, CA 91752
www.EastvaleCOC.org
Nov. 30, 23

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR EASTVALE LIBRARY AND INNOVATION CENTER

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

On behalf of the Eastvale Chamber, I write to express our utmost support for the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft.

Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. Eastvale Chamber hereby expresses our strongest support for the City of Eastvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly on (951) 768 6000.

Respectfully,

Hari Dhiman
President, Co-Founder
596

Board of Trustees
Robert Garcia President, Joseph Navarro Clerk, Karen Bradford, M.A., Eric Ditwiler, Ph.D., Melissa Ragole

December 7, 2023

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR EASTVALE LIBRARY AND INNOVATION CENTER

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

On behalf of the Jurupa Unified School District , I write to express our utmost support for the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The City of Eastvale plans to contract with local college institutions to provide satellite classes and services at the library’s state -of-the-art innovation center. This will positively impact the Inland Empire Region by providing access to library resources as well as advanced education opportunities.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. JUSD hereby expresses our strongest support for the City of Eastvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Trenton Hansen, PhD
Superintendent

597
598

4080 LEMON STREET ● 5TH FLOOR ● P.O. BOX 1646 ● RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 ● (951) 955-1020 www.rivcodistrict2.org
STAFF
PHIL PAULE, Chief of Staff
DEBORAH ROSE, Deputy Chief of Staff
LILIANA ALLIN, Office Administration/Legislative Assistant MELANIE BONILLA, Field Representative
ELYSSE RICO, Media Coordinator
MADELYN TORRES, Board Assistant
AMBER SMALLEY, Field Representative
MELANIA CASTELLANOS, Field Representative
JACQUELINE ARMENTA, Youth Advisory Council/Legislative intern

KAREN SPIEGEL

SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

December 7, 2023

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Re: Letter of Support for the Eastvale Library and Innovation Center

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

As the Riverside County Supervisor for the Second District, I am pleased to support the construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center in the City of Eastvale.

The City of Eastvale currently contracts with the Riverside County Library System which operates a location on the Eleanor Roosevelt High School (ERHS) campus in Eastvale. Due to the library’s current location, public access is limited to only after school hours. The new Eastvale Library and Innovation Center, which will be constructed in Downtown Eastvale at the corner of Hamner Avenue and Limonite Avenue, will be available for longer hours, house additional resources, and will serve as an educational hub within the city. The project will create a permanent location for library services accessible to both Eastvale residents and the surrounding community.

The City of Eastval e plans to contract with local college institutions to provide satellite classes and services at the library’s state-of-the-art innovation center. This will positively impact the Inland Empire Region by providing access to library resources as well as advanced educational opportunities.

The lack of a permanent library impacts the City of Eastvale’s access to resources, quality of life, and sense of community. It is for these reasons that I strongly support this important project for the City of Eastvale’s construction of a 25,000 sq. ft. Library and Innovation Center. Please do not hesitate to contact my office if you have any questions regarding my support at (951) 955 - 1020. On behalf of the Second District of Riverside County, we thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Karen Spiegel
Second District Supervisor
County of Riverside
599

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

PUBLIC HEARINGS

Agenda Item No. 12.1
January 24, 2024
User Fee Study Results and Adop+on of City Fees for Various City Services
Prepared By:

Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Conduct Public Hearing on Considera"on of a Resolu"on Establishing and Adop"ng City Fees for Various City Services; and
2 .

Receive User Fee Study Findings Report; and
3 .

Approve and Adopt the Proposed Resolu"on Establishing and Adop"ng City Fees for Various City Services.

Summary
In an eﬀort to establish appropriate levels of cost recovery for city services provided to individuals, businesses, or groups rather than the general public, staﬀ ini"ated a comprehensive cost alloca"on and user fee study in 2021. User fees were established in 2013 when the city adopted user fees a0er the comple"on of the city's ﬁrst user fee study; prior to 2013 the city relied on Riverside County fees to operate. The 2013 user fee study did not provide for an annual rate inﬂator, as such current rates are reﬂec"ve of ten year old data. Addi"onally, when the study was completed in 2013 it was based on a service model of limited in-house posi"ons and a high dependence on contract services, whereas the city now has limited contract services and mainly relies on in-house positions to provide services. Staﬀ engaged Willdan Financial Services in July 2021 for a citywide comprehensive cost alloca"on plan and user fee study. The cost alloca"on plan determines indirect costs and overhead to be included in fully burdened rate calcula"ons; these rate calcula"ons are then u"lized to 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
600
calculate cost recovery for speciﬁc fees. The ﬁnal User Fee Study determines the cost of service provision (both in-house and contract services), assigns a fully burdened rate for those services, and provides recommended changes in the fees charged for those services. Staﬀ recommends se?ng user fees as close to full cost recovery as feasible with an annual inﬂator, as demonstrated by the attached user fee schedules.

The cost alloca"on plan ensures that the city u"lizes accurate and comprehensive overhead rates for the provision of city services in addi"on to recovering within the General Fund indirect costs from other funds. It is common for government agencies to recover indirect support costs from internal service departments such as Finance and Human Resources. The City's current cost alloca"on plan was developed in 2016 by staﬀ and established indirect overhead costs and alloca"ons to the city's opera"ng departments such as Building, Planning, and Public Works. In order to ensure accurate user fee calcula"on of direct and indirect costs Willdan completed a full citywide cost alloca"on plan prior to the user fee study to determine the reasonable alloca"on of indirect support costs to the opera"ng departments and funds they support. The alloca"on methodology standards u"lized to allocate the central service func"on costs deemed reasonable for alloca"on were in conformance with Federal Oﬃce of Management and Budget (OMB) to ensure adequate city compliance with state requirements and proper user fee calculations.

Addi"onally, City Council approved the addi"on of a Fire Preven"on Business Inspec"on Program with the 2020-21 budget. At that "me, City Council approved the addi"on of a 0.5 full "me equivalent Fire Systems Inspector through the city's contract with Riverside County Fire. At that "me City Council voted to provide a 100% subsidy to businesses for the inspec"on services. Staﬀ recommends adop"ng a 100% cost recovery model for the inspec"on services and charging fees to businesses for inspection services.

The fees are capped at an ini"al increase of 50% for exis"ng fees. The resolu"on adop"ng the fees allows for an annual inﬂator for fees set at less than 100% cost recovery; these fees will be increased annually by no more than 25% un"l full cost recovery is achieved. In addi"on, the adop"on of the fees includes an annual inﬂator based on the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of 20%. The inﬂator shall be annually calculated and applied by the Finance Department on July 1 of each year.

Background
History of Current Cost Allocation Plan and User Fees
The city's current user fee schedules are based on the city's ﬁrst user fee study that was completed and adopted in 2013. A user fee is an amount charged for governmental service or ac"vity that is performed at the request of and speciﬁcally for the beneﬁt of a par"cular individual, business, or group as opposed to a service provided for the community as a whole. User fees recover costs associated with providing speciﬁc services beneﬁ?ng the user, thereby reducing the use of limited General Fund subsidies for individual beneﬁt. The city retained MGT of America, Inc. (MGT) to ini"ate a citywide review and assessment of all exis"ng fees related to the provision of city services.

The purpose of the review was to determine the full cost of opera"ons for services provided at that "me, in 2013, with the intent of se?ng user fees based on actual expenditures. Although cost alloca"on ac"vi"es were analyzed, a speciﬁc Cost Alloca"on Plan was not adopted at that "me. User fees based on the MGT study were adopted by the Council based on 2013 service and expenditure levels. Since the adop"on of Resolu"on 13-26, the user fee rates for deposit based fees were 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
601
adjusted in July 2020 to beJer reﬂect the current cost of contracted services and newly created in- house services. The update included a pass through of contractor rates and employee wages while staﬀ worked to issue a request for proposal and contract for a new comprehensive user fee study.

All other fees have not been assessed nor updated since 2013.

Study Objective
Due to the complexity and breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fees, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to iden"fy the full costs of individual fee and program activities.

As the City of Eastvale seeks to eﬃciently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increased service demands, it needs a variety of tools. These tools provide assurance that the city has the best informa"on and the best resources available to make sound decisions, fairly and legi"mately set fees, maintain compliance with state law and local policies, and meet the needs of the city administra"on and its cons"tuency. Given the limita"ons on raising revenue in local government, the city recognizes that a User Fee Study is a very cost-eﬀec"ve way to understand the total cost of services and iden"fy poten"al fee deﬁciencies. Essen"ally, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.

The total cost of each service included in this analysis is based on the full cost of providing city services, including direct salaries and beneﬁts of city staﬀ, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full cost recovery fee for the city to provide each service; however, each fee is set at the city's discre"on, up to 100% of the total cost, as speciﬁed in the report. The principal goal of the study was to help the city determine the full cost of the services that the city provides. In addi"on, Willdan established a series of addi"onal objectives including:

Developing a rational basis for setting fees
Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model Ensuring compliance with State law
Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees
Maintaining accordance with city policies and goals

The study results will help the city beJer understand its true costs of providing services and may serve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regarding the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect from individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the city.

Scope of the Study
The scope of the study included a review and calcula"on of the user fees charged by the following departments:

Building
Fire
City Clerk
Planning
Community Enhancement and Safety (Code
Enforcement)
Community Services
Engineering
Police
Finance
Special Events

Project Approach 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
602
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for city personnel directly involved in providing services.

The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and beneﬁts, but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calcula"on of fully burdened rates are:

Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
Operating costs applicable to fee operations
Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead Indirect city-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan

An important factor in determining the fully burdened rate is in the calcula"on of produc"ve hours for personnel. This calcula"on takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this ﬁgure to account for calculated or an"cipated hours employees are involved in non-billable ac"vi"es such as paid vaca"on, sick leave, emergency leave, holidays, and other considera"ons as necessary.

Dividing the full cost by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunc"on with "me es"mates, when appropriate, to calculate a fee's cost based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service.

Allowable Costs
The report iden"ﬁes three types of costs that, when combined, cons"tute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A of AJachment 1). Costs are deﬁned as direct labor, including salary and beneﬁts, departmental overhead costs, and the city's central services overhead, where departmental and central service overhead costs cons"tute support costs. These cost types are defined as follows:

Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The costs related to staﬀ salaries for "me spent directly on fee-related services. Costs are based on fiscal year 2023-24 salaries and benefits.

Departmental Overhead: A propor"onal alloca"on of departmental overhead costs, including opera"on costs such as supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.

Central Services Overhead: These costs, detailed in the city's Cost Alloca"on Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departments whose primary func"on is to support other city departments.

Methodology
The three methods of analysis for calculating fees used in the report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Approach): This approach es"mates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when city staﬀ "me requirements do not vary drama"cally for a service, or for special projects where the "me and cost requirements are easy to iden"fy at the project’s outset. Further, the method is eﬀec"ve in instances when a staﬀ member from one department assists on an applica"on, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are es"mated based upon interviews with city staﬀ regarding the "me typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Programma"c Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
603
leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach imprac"cal. In addi"on, market factors and policy concerns (as opposed to actual costs) tend to inﬂuence fee levels more than other types of services.

Willdan employed a diﬀerent methodology where appropriate to ﬁt the programs’ needs and goals.

Typical programma"c approach cases are facility use fees, penal"es, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.

Valua"on Based Fees: This manner of collec"on is used when the valua"on of the improvement can be used as a proxy for the amount of eﬀort it would take for city staﬀ to complete the service provided. More speciﬁcally, this approach is commonly used for certain User Fees in the Building Division. It is generally accepted that as a project’s size scales up, the cost of the project increases, and the amount of eﬀort needed to review and inspect also increases. Using a valua"on-based fees provides for a system that can adjust as project sizes scale. Land is not included in the valuation.

Reasons for Cost Increases/Decreases Over Current Fees
Within the fee tables in AJachment 1 Appendix C, the diﬀerences are iden"ﬁed between the full costs calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in eﬀect. The reasons for diﬀerences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:

Previous fee levels may have been set at levels less than full cost inten"onally, based on policy decisions
Staﬃng levels and the posi"ons that complete fee and service ac"vity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that diﬀered from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study Costs that this study has iden"ﬁed as part of the full cost of services may not have been accounted for in a previous study
Departmental overhead and administration costs
Vehicle and Facility Maintenance support costs
Indirect overhead from the Cost Allocation Plan
Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the city as a whole

Cost Recovery and Subsidization
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in AJachment 1 Appendix C. Full cost recovery is determined by summing the es"mated amount of "me each posi"on (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time es"mates for each service rendered were predominately determined by Willdan and City Staﬀ through a "me and materials survey conducted for each department/division fee included in the study. The resul"ng cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The city’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in the appendix for reference.

It is important to note that the "me and materials survey used to determine the amount of "me each employee spends assis"ng in the provision of the services listed on the fee schedule is essen"al in iden"fying the total cost of providing each service. Speciﬁcally, in providing services, a number of employees are o0en involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

A primary goal of this study was to iden"fy the cost of city services, to provide informa"on to help the city make informed decisions regarding the actual fee levels and charges. The responsibility to determine the ﬁnal fee levels is a complicated task. City staﬀ must consider many issues in 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
604
formula"ng recommenda"ons, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staﬀ assumes the responsibility to develop speciﬁc fee level recommenda"ons to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the city, since many of the considera"ons are based on the unique characteris"cs of the City of Eastvale, and administra"ve and poli"cal discre"on. However, in se?ng the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the service solely benefits one end user or the general community.

The aJached report and appendices iden"ﬁes appropriate cost recovery for city services and the recommended level of recovery as determined through discussions Willdan. The reality of the local government fee environment is that signiﬁcant increases to achieve 100% cost recovery can o0en not be feasible, desirable, or appropriate depending on policy direc"on —par"cularly in a single year. The recommended fees iden"ﬁed herein are either at or less than full cost recovery, with a majority of the fees at 100% cost recovery. Special Events is the only department with a signiﬁcant subsidy, ranging from 1% up to 69%. Cost recovery objec"ves can be based on a variety of factors including the public versus private beneﬁt provided by the service. If an ac"vity has a public beneﬁt, it might be more appropriately supported by General Fund resources. Conversely, if an ac"vity has mostly private beneﬁts, it might be more appropriately supported by fees. Ac"vi"es that have a mix of public and private beneﬁts might be best supported by a combina"on of fees and General Fund subsidy. An example of General Fund subsidies can be found in the city's Events fees, as staﬀ proposes to subsidize Events that have a mix of private and public use.

Fee Summary
Department
# of
Fees
Increase
# of Fees
Decrease
# Fees
Remain
Same
#
New
Fees
Average
Increase
(Decrease)
over
Existing
Fees*
Notes
Building Safety
18 26
7 65
12% flat
fees only
Change from deposit based to
valuation based
City Clerk
0 1
0 5
(0.25%)
Decrease to Passport Photo fee
Community
Enhancement &
Safety
3 0
13 2
2%
Most flat rate fees were below
full cost, 50% capped increase
Engineering
11 9
3 32
2%
3 fees change from Hourly to
Actual Cost/Deposit
Finance
1 2
3 1
(15%)
Most flat rate fees were below
full cost, 50% capped increase
Fire
17 67
0 20
(36%)
Some fees retain subsidy as
increases limited to 50%
Planning
17 11
3 9
2%
Most flat rate fees were below
full cost, 50% capped increase
Community Safety
1 0
0 3
29%
Most flat rate fees were below
full cost, 100% recovery
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
605
Police
1 0
1 0
12%
Increase to Towed Vehicle
Release fee
Special Events
0 0
0 16
N/A**
All 16 fees retain some level of
subsidy
*Increase and decrease is specific to existing fees only, as there is no comparative analysis available for new fees
**New Department with all new fees

Future Inflator
Staﬀ recommends an annual inﬂator for all fees. The widely known and accepted inﬂator is the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Staﬀ recommends u"lizing the CPI dataset for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. Applica"on of the CPI increase shall be on July 1 of each year and based the prior 12 month period ending March. This allows staﬀ to adjust revenue es"mates in line with the annual ﬁscal year budget process. If for any reason, the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Sta"s"cs eliminates the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario data table, a similar table that encompases the Riverside County area the City of Eastvale is located in shall be utilized.

Addi"onally, for fees that were capped to a 50% increase, staﬀ recommends incrementally increasing those fees by 25% over the next several ﬁscal years un"l the full 100% cost recovery is achieved. The 25% increase shall be implemented on July 1 of the year, which will allow staﬀ to adjust revenue estimates with the annual fiscal year budget process.

Best Practices
The update to the city's cost alloca"on and user fee schedules is in line with the Government Finance Oﬃcer's Associa"on (GFOA) best prac"ces for eﬀec"ve and eﬃcient service provision. The GFOA recommends all government agencies should calculate the full cost of services provided and allocate indirect costs. The recently completed cost alloca"on and user fee study project will ensure that the city maintains industry best practices and charges fair rates with regard to service provision.

Future Studies
The city should conduct a comprehensive fee review every ﬁve years. This would allow staﬀ to update the master user fee schedules by adding or removing fees for new or eliminated programs and services and ensuring that users are charged proper fees for city services.

Environmental
Government ﬁscal ac"vi"es and fee studies are not considered a Project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 3
| Target #: C
| Goal #: 6
Ensure revenues align with expenditures.

Fiscal Impact
Once the fees are implemented and staﬀ has a few months of revenue data the ﬁscal year 2024-25 budget will be prepared with new revenue es"mates for the newly adopted fees. Staﬀ an"cipates a minimal increase to General Fund revenues as a result of the new fees; this is primarily based upon the new ﬂat fee approach versus the current deposit based fees. Deposit based fees has historically created signiﬁcant collec"on challenges for the Finance Department and the new user fees 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
606
signiﬁcantly reduce the reliance upon deposits in favor of ﬂat fees that can be collected at the city's front counter at the "me services are requested. Addi"onally, staﬀ an"cipates a substan"al increase in Fire Fund revenues for the Fire Preven"on Business Inspec"on Program. Currently, the city does not charge for this service which was added in ﬁscal year 2020-21. Staﬀ expects annual inspec"on permit revenue to oﬀset the roughly $80,000 cost for the Riverside County Fire Systems Inspector that runs the program; currently the program is 100% subsidized by Fire Fund resources.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
City Council adopted resolu"on 13-26 on September 25, 2013. The resolu"on established user fees based on the 2013 study completed by MGT of America, Inc.. City Council adopted updated developer deposit related passthrough fees via resolu"on 20-54 on July 22, 2020. User fees have not been updated since 2013. City Council approved the professional services contract with Willdan Financial Services on July 28, 2021 for cost allocation plan and user fee study services.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Report: User Fee Study Findings

Attachment 2 - Resolution Adopting User Fees

Attachment 3 - Exhibit A to Resolution

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
607

CITY OF EASTVALE, CA
User Fee Study Report
April 2019
User Fee Study
608

i Comprehensive User Fee Study

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................. ................................................... ............. i Executive Summary ................................. ................................................... .............. 1 User Fee Background ............................... ................................................... ............. 2 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 2 California User Fee History .......................................................................................................................... 2 Additional Policy Considerations ................................................................................................................. 3 Study Objective ................................... ................................................... ................. 4 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Aim of the Report......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Approach and Methodology .................. ................................................... ...... 6 Conceptual Approach................................................................................................................................... 6 Fully Burdened Hourly Rates........................................................................................................................ 6 Summary Steps of the Study ........................................................................................................................ 7 Allowable Costs ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Quality Control/Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 8 Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current fees............................................................................. 8 City Staff Contributions ................................................................................................................................ 9 Eastvale User Fees ................................ ................................................... .............. 10 Cost Recovery............................................................................................................................................. 10 Subsidization .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Impact on Demand (Elasticity) ................................................................................................................... 11 Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Building Safety .................................................. ................................................... 12 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 12 City Clerk......................................... ................................................... .................. 13 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Code Enforcement .................................. ................................................... ............ 14 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 Engineering ....................................... ................................................... ................ 15 609

ii Comprehensive User Fee Study

Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Finance ........................................... ................................................... .................. 16 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Fire .............................................. ................................................... ..................... 17 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Planning .................................................. ................................................... ......... 18 Analysis ................................................................................................................................................... 18 Community Safety .................................. ................................................... ............ 19 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 19 Police ............................................ ................................................... .................... 20 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Special Events .................................... ................................................... ................ 21 Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered . ................................................. 2 2 Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates .......... ................................................... .. 23 Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis ............... ................................................... ..... 25

610

1 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Executive Summary
The City of Eastvale engaged Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to determine the full costs incurred by the City to support the various activities for which th e City charges user fees. Due to the complexity an d the breadth of performing a comprehensive review of fee s, Willdan employed a variety of fee methodologies to identify the full costs of individual fee and pr ogram activities. This report and the appendices h erein identifies 100% full cost recovery for City service s and the recommended level of recovery as determin ed through discussion with departmental staff.

The reality of the local government fee environment is that significant increases to achieve 100% cost recovery can often not be feasible, desirable, or appropriate depending on policy direction —particularly in a single year. The recommended fees identified herein are either at or less than full cost recovery.

611

2 Comprehensive User Fee Study

User Fee Background
Background
As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund programs and services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole. As cities struggle to maintain levels of service and variability of demand, they have bec ome increasingly aware of subsidies provided by the General Fund and have implemented cost-recovery tar gets. To the extent that governments use general tax monies to provide individuals with private bene fits, and not require them to pay the full cost of the service (and, therefore, receive a subsidy), the government is limiting funds that may be available to provide other community-wide benefits. In effect, the gover nment is using community funds to pay for private benefit. Unlike most revenue sources, cities have m ore control over the level of user fees they charge to recover costs, or the subsidies they can institute.

Fees in California are required to conform to the s tatutory requirements of the California Constitutio n, Proposition 218, and the California Code of Regulations. The Code also requires that the City Council adopt fees by either ordinance or resolution, and that any fees in excess of the estimated total cost of ren dering the related services must be approved by a popular vote of two-thirds of those electors voting because the charge would be considered a tax and not a fee.

California User Fee History
Before Proposition 13, California cities were less concerned with potential subsidies and recovering the cost of their services from individual fee payers. In times of fiscal shortages, cities simply raised property taxes, which funded everything from police and recreation to development-related services. However, this situation changed with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.

Proposition 13 established the era of revenue limitation in California local government. In subsequent years, the state saw a series of additional limitations to local government revenues. Proposition 4 (1979) defined the difference between a tax and a fee: a fee can be no greater than the cost of providing the service; and Proposition 218 (1996) further limited the impositi on of taxes for certain classes of fees. As a resul t, cities were required to secure a supermajority vote in order to enact or increase taxes. Since the public continues to resist efforts to raise local government taxes, cities have little control and very few successful options for new revenues. Compounding this limitation, the Stat e of California took a series of actions in the 199 0’s and 2000’s to improve the State’s fiscal situation—at the expense of local governments. As an example, in 2004-05, the Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) take-away of property taxes and the reduction of Vehicle License Fees have severely reduced local tax revenues.

In addition, on November 2, 2010, California voters approved Proposition 26, the “Stop Hidden Taxes Initiative”, which is aimed at defining “regulatory fees” as a special tax rather than a fee, thus req uiring approval by two-thirds vote of local voters. These regulatory fees are typically intended to mitigate the societal and environmental impacts of a business or person’s activities. Proposition 26 contains seve n categories of exceptions. The fees analyzed as par t of this study fell under categories one through f ive consisting of charges for specific benefits, govern ment service, regulatory need, for use of governmen t property, or a fine/penalty.
612

3 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Additional Policy Considerations
The recent trend for municipalities is to update th eir fee schedules to reflect the actual costs of ce rtain public services primarily benefiting users. User Fees recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes.

In addition to collecting the direct cost of labor and materials associated with processing and administering user services, it is common for local governments t o recover support costs. Support costs are those c osts relating to a local government’s central service de partments that are properly allocable to the local government’s operating departments. Central service s support cost allocations were incorporated using the resulting indirect overhead percentages determi ned through the Cost Allocation Plan. This plan was developed prior to the User Fee study to determine the burden placed upon central services by the operating departments in order to allocate a proportionate share of central service cost.

As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuate over time, a significant element in the development of any fee schedule is that it h as the flexibility to remain current. Therefore, i t is recommended that the City include an inflationary f actor in the resolution adopting the fee schedule t o allow the City Council, by resolution, to annually increase or decrease the fees.

The City may employ many different inflationary fac tors. The most commonly used inflator is some form of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as it is widely w ell known and accepted. A similar inflator is the implicit price deflator for GDP, which is much like the CPI except that while the CPI is based on the same “bas ket” of goods and services every year, the price deflato rs’ “basket” can change year to year. Since the pr imary factor for the cost of a City’s services is usually the costs of the personnel involved, tying an infl ationary factor that connects more directly to the personnel costs can be suitable if there is a clear method, or current practice of obtaining said factor.

Each City should use an inflator that they believe works the best for their specific situation and needs. It is also recommended that the City perform this interna l review annually with a comprehensive review of services and fees performed every three to five years, which would include adding or removing fees for any new or eliminated programs/services.

613

4 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Study Objective
As the City of Eastvale seeks to efficiently manage limited resources and adequately respond to increa sed service demands, it needs a variety of tools. Thes e tools provide assurance that the City has the bes t information and the best resources available to mak e sound decisions, fairly and legitimately set fees , maintain compliance with state law and local polici es, and meet the needs of the City administration a nd its constituency. Given the limitations on raising revenue in local government, the City recognizes th at a User Fee Study is a very cost-effective way to unde rstand the total cost of services and identify pote ntial fee deficiencies. Essentially, a User Fee is a payment for a requested service provided by a local government that primarily benefits an individual or group.

The total cost of each service included in this ana lysis is based on the full cost of providing City s ervices, including direct salaries and benefits of City staff, direct departmental costs, and indirect costs from central service support. This study determines the full co st recovery fee for the City to provide each servic e; however, each fee is set at the City’s discretion, up to 100% of the total cost, as specified in this report.

The principal goal of the study was to help the Cit y determine the full cost of the services that the City provides. In addition, Willdan established a series of additional objectives including:
 Developing a rational basis for setting fees
 Identifying subsidy amount, if applicable, of each fee in the model  Ensuring compliance with State law
 Developing an updatable and comprehensive list of fees  Maintaining accordance with City policies and goals
The study results will help the City better underst and its true costs of providing services and may se rve as a basis for making informed policy decisions regard ing the most appropriate fees, if any, to collect f rom individuals and organizations that require individualized services from the City.

Scope of the Study
The scope of this study encompasses a review and ca lculation of the user fees charged by the following Eastvale departments and fee groups:
 Building
 City Clerk
 Code Enforcement
 Engineering
 Finance
 Fire
 Planning
 Community Services
 Police
 Special Events
The study involved the identification of existing a nd potential new fees, fee schedule restructuring, data collection and analysis, orientation and consultati on, quality control, communication and presentation s, and calculation of individual service costs (fees) or program cost recovery levels. 614

5 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Aim of the Report
The User Fee Study focused on the cost of City serv ices, as City staff currently provides them at exis ting, known, or reasonably anticipated service and staff levels. This report provides a summary of the stud y results, and a general description of the approach and methods Willdan and City staff used to determin e the recommended fee schedule. The report is not int ended to document all of the numerous discussions throughout the process, nor is it intended to provide influential dissertation on the qualities of the utilized tools, techniques, or other approaches.

615

6 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Project Approach and Methodology
Conceptual Approach
The basic concept of a User Fee Study is to determi ne the “reasonable cost” of each service provided by the City for which it charges a user fee. The full cost of providing a service may not necessarily become the City’s fee, but it serves as the objective basis as to the maximum amount that may be collected.

The standard fee limitation established in California law for property-related (non-discretionary) fees is the “estimated, reasonable cost” principle. In order to maintain compliance with the letter and spirit of this standard, every component of the fee study process included a related review. The use of budget figure s, time estimates, and improvement valuation clearly indicates reliance upon estimates for some data.

Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
The total cost of each service included in this analysis is primarily based on the Fully Burdened Hourly Rates (FBHRs) that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing services. The FBHRs include not only personnel salary and benefits, but also any costs that are reasonably ascribable to personnel. The cost elements that are included in the calculation of fully burdened rates are:
 Salaries & benefits of personnel involved
 Operating costs applicable to fee operations
 Departmental support, supervision, and administration overhead  Indirect City-wide overhead costs calculated through the Cost Allocation Plan An important factor in determining the fully burden ed rate is in the calculation of productive hours f or personnel. This calculation takes the available workable hours in a year of 2,080 and adjusts this fi gure to account for calculated or anticipated hours’ employ ees are involved in non-billable activities such as paid vacation, sick leave, emergency leave, holidays, and other considerations as necessary. Dividing the full cost by the number of productive hours provides the FBHR.

The FBHRs are then used in conjunction with time es timates, when appropriate, to calculate a fee’s cos t based on the personnel and the amount of their time that is involved in providing each service. 616

7 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Summary Steps of the Study
The methodology to evaluate most User Fee levels is straightforward and simple in concept. The following list provides a summary of the study process steps:

Allowable Costs
This report identifies three types of costs that, w hen combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service (Appendix A) . Costs are defined as
direct labor, including salary and benefits,
departmental overhead costs, and the City’s
central services overhead, where
departmental and central service overhead
costs constitute support costs. These cost
types are defined as follows:
 Direct Labor (Personnel Costs): The
costs related to staff salaries for
time spent directly on fee-related
services.
 Departmental Overhead: A
proportional allocation of
departmental overhead costs,
including operation costs such as
supplies and materials that are necessary for the department to function.  Central Services Overhead: These costs, detailed in the City’s Cost Allocation Plan, represent services provided by those Central Services Departm ents whose primary function is to support other City departments.

Data Analysis
Department Interviews
Time Estimates
Labor Costs
Cost Allocation Plan
Building Cost Layers
Direct Services
Indirect Services
Department Overhead
City-Wide Overhead
Set Fees
Define the Full Cost of
Services
Set Cost Recovery Policy
617

8 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Methodology
The three methods of analysis for calculating fees used in this report are the:

Case Study Method (Standard Unit Cost Build-Up Appr oach): This approach estimates the actual labor and material costs associated with providing a unit of service to a single user. This analysis is suitable when City staff time requirements do not vary drama tically for a service, or for special projects wher e the time and cost requirements are easy to identify at the project’s outset. Further, the method is effective in instances when a staff member from one department a ssists on an application, service or permit for another department on an as-needed basis. Costs are estimated based upon interviews with City staff regarding the time typically spent on tasks, a review of available records, and a time and materials analysis.

Programmatic Approach: In some instances, the underlying data is not available or varies widely, leaving a standard unit cost build-up approach impractical. In addition, market factors and policy concerns (a s opposed to actual costs) tend to influence fee leve ls more than other types of services. Willdan employed a different methodology where appropriate to fit th e programs’ needs and goals. Typical programmatic approach cases are facility use fees, penalties, and instances where a program cost is divided over the user base to obtain a per applicant cost for shared cost services.

Valuation Based Fees: This manner of collection is used when the valuati on of the improvement can be used as a proxy for the amount of effort it would take for City staff to complete the service provided. More specifically, this approach is commonly used for ce rtain User Fees in the Building Division. It is gen erally accepted that as a project’s size scales up, the cost of the project increases, and the amount of effort needed to review and inspect also increases. Using a valuation-based fees provides for a system that can adjust as project sizes scale. Land is not included in the valuation.

Quality Control/Quality Assurance
All study components are interrelated, thus flawed data at any step in the process will cause the ulti mate results to be inconsistent and unsound. The element s of our Quality Control process for User Fee calculations include:
 Involvement of knowledgeable City staff
 Clear instructions and guidance to City staff
 Reasonableness tests and validation
 Normalcy/expectation ranges
 Internal and external reviews
 Cross-checking
Reasons for cost increases/decreases over current f ees Within the fee tables in Appendix C , the differences are identified between the full c osts calculated through the study and the fee levels currently in e ffect. The reasons for differences between the two can arise from a number of possible factors including:
618

9 Comprehensive User Fee Study

 Previous fee levels may have been set at levels les s than full cost intentionally, based on policy decisions
 Staffing levels and the positions that complete fee and service activity may vary from when the previous costs were calculated
 Personnel and materials costs could have increased at levels that differed from any inflationary factors used to increase fees since the last study
 Costs that this study has identified as part of the full cost of services may not have been accounted for in a previous study
o Departmental overhead and administration costs
o Vehicle and Facility Maintenance support costs
o Indirect overhead from the Cost Allocation Plan
 Changes in processes and procedures within a department, or the City as a whole City Staff Contributions
As part of the study process, Willdan received tremendous support and cooperation from City staff, which contributed and reviewed a variety of components to the study, including:
 Budget and other cost data
 Staffing structures
 Fee and service structures, organization, and descriptions  Direct and indirect work hours (billable/non-billable)  Time estimates to complete work tasks
 Review of draft results and other documentation
A User Fee Study requires significant involvement o f the managers and line staff from the departments— on top of their existing workloads and competing pr iorities. The contributions from City staff were cr itical to this study. We would like to express our appreci ation to the City and its staff for their assistanc e, professionalism, positive attitudes, helpful suggestions, responsiveness, and overall cooperation.

619

10 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Eastvale User Fees
Cost Recovery
The cost recovery models, by department/division fee type, are presented in detail in Appendix C . Full cost recovery is determined by summing the estimated amount of time each position (in increments of minutes or hours) spends to render a service. Time estimate s for each service rendered were predominately determined by Willdan and City Staff through a time and materials survey conducted for each department/division fee included in the study. The resulting cost recovery amount represents the total cost of providing each service. The City’s current fee being charged for each service, if applicable, is provided in this section, as well, for reference.

It is important to note that the time and materials survey used to determine the amount of time each employee spends assisting in the provision of the s ervices listed on the fee schedule is essential in identifying the total cost of providing each servic e. Specifically, in providing services, a number of employees are often involved in various aspects of the process, spending anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on the service.

A primary goal of this study was to identify the cost of City services, to provide information to help the City make informed decisions regarding the actual fee le vels and charges. The responsibility to determine t he final fee levels is a complicated task. City staff must consider many issues in formulating recommendations, and the City Council must consider those same issues and more in making the final decisions.

City staff assumes the responsibility to develop sp ecific fee level recommendations to present to the City Council. Unfortunately, there are no hard and fast rules to guide the City, since many of the considerations are based on the unique characteristics of the City of Eastvale, and administrative and political disc retion.

However, in setting the level of full cost recovery for each fee, one should consider whether the serv ice solely benefits one end user or the general community.

Subsidization
Recalling the definition of a user fee helps guide decisions regarding subsidization. The general standard is that individuals (or groups) who receive a wholly p rivate benefit should pay 100% of the full cost of the services. In contrast, services that are simply public benefit should be funded entirely by the general fund’s tax dollars. Unfortunately, for the decision makers , many services fall into the range between these t wo extremes.

Further complicating the decision, opponents of fee s often assert that the activities subject to the f ees provide economic, cultural, “quality of life,” or other community benefits that exceed the costs to the City.

It is recommended the City consider such factors during its deliberations regarding appropriate fee levels.

Of course, subsidization can be an effective public policy tool, since it can be used to reduce fees t o encourage certain activities (such as compliance inspections to ensure public safety) or allow some people to be able to afford to receive services they other wise could not at the full cost. In addition, subsi dies can 620

11 Comprehensive User Fee Study

be an appropriate and justifiable action, such as t o allow citizens to rightfully access services, wit hout burdensome costs.

Despite the intent, it is important for the City an d public to understand that subsidies must be cover ed by another revenue source, such as the General Fund. Therefore, the general taxpayer will potentially help to fund private benefits, and/or other City services will not receive funds that are otherwise directed to cover subsidies.

Impact on Demand (Elasticity)
Economic principles of elasticity suggest that increased costs for services (higher fees) will eventually curtail the demand for the services; whereas lower fees may spark an incentive to utilize the services and encourage certain actions. Either of these conditi ons may be a desirable effect to the City. However, the level of the fees that would cause demand changes i s largely unknown. The cost-of-service study did no t attempt to evaluate the economic or behavioral impa cts of higher or lower fees; nevertheless, the City should consider the potential impacts of these issues when deciding on fee levels.

Summary
If the City’s principal goal of this study were to maximize revenues from user fees, Willdan would recommend setting user fees at 100% of the full cost identified in this study. However, we understand that revenue enhancement is not the only goal of a cost- of-service study, and sometimes full-cost recovery is not needed, desired, or appropriate. Other City and departmental goals, City Council priorities, polic y initiatives, past experience, implementation issues , and other internal and external factors may influ ence staff recommendations and City Council decisions. I n this case, the proper identification of additiona l services (new or existing services) and creation of a consistent and comprehensive fee schedule was th e primary objective of this study. City staff has reviewed the full costs and identified the “recommended fee levels” for consideration by City Council. The attached appendices exhibit these unit fees individually.

The preceding sections provide background for each department or division and the results of this study’s analysis of their fees. For the full list of each fee’s analysis, refer to Appendix C of this report.

621

12 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Building Safety

The Building Safety Division ensures life and safety for the Eastvale community. Safety is achieved through building plan review, issues building permits, and performs inspections for new development, large sca le development, businesses, and homeowners. All work i s provided in accordance with City regulations and building codes including Americans with Disabilitie s Act (ADA) and compliance with State accessibility requirements. The Building Safety team provides highly trained staff and an outstanding level of customer service.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and prog rams associated with the Building Safety Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Building Safety Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach (except for fees related to the Building Permit program), w hereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fe e occurrence using staff time to recover the direct c ost of staff and pro-rata share of departmental cos ts, including indirect costs for City Central Services. The analysis found that services are currently set below the full cost of providing them. It is recommended that the City increase cost recovery to 100% for Building services as detailed in Appendix C . As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 18 fees;
 26 fees would decrease;
 7 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 65 new fees would be added.

In addition to the above referenced fees listed und er Building, the Building Permit fees are also prov ided by this Department. For the Building Permit fees, t he City is looking to change their current deposit based fee structure to valuation-based fees. Valuation is used as a proxy for measuring the amount of effort needed to provide services on a case-by-case basis. This method is an industry standard widely used by other jurisdictions to evaluate the cost of providi ng service where types of projects and project size s can vary to a large degree. It is generally understood that the larger and more complex a project is, more time and effort that is required to provide code complia nce services. Project valuation also follows that t rend with there being more cost of construction involved with more complex building types. Using historical project valuation, a multiplier was calculated to determine the amount of cost per valuation dollar needed to recover the full cost of providing service. Dividing the total cost of service by the average annual valuation of projects provided for a full cost multiplier of .00967 for Plan Check and Building Permit services. The table within
Appendix C details the fee based on project valuation. It is suggested that the City adopt the fees as listed to recover the full cost of service.

622

13 Comprehensive User Fee Study

City Clerk
The City Clerk’s office of the City of Eastvale is committed to ethically serving the needs of the residents of our community by providing equal access to open and transparent government, ensuring the integrity of the participatory process, bridging internal and ex ternal communication pathways, and enhancing the public’s trust in local government. Conducting regu lar and special general municipal elections in consolidation with the County of Riverside for the election of City Council members and local initiati ves, referendums, and recalls. Administering Political Reform Act requirements related to campaign disclosu re statements, conflict of interest filings, and AB 1234 Ethics Training.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associat ed with the City Clerk. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the City Clerk Service for Passport Photo Fee relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build- up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable c ost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calcul ated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is r ecovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that the passport photo fee flat fee is currently set below the full cost of providing the service. The suggested fees in Appendix C were set to limit any fee increase to 50% or the full cost (whichever is less) based on the full cost calculation. As a result, there would be:
 An decrease to the Passport Photo Fee to $7 from $10,  5 new fees would be added, and;
 the remaining passport fees are set by the Department of State and would remain as currently set as detailed in Appendix C .

623

14 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Code Enforcement
The Community Enhancement and Safety (CES) Division provides education to the public regarding land use ordinances and municipal code provisions, provides training opportunities to both staff and residents about emergency preparedness, supports the neighborhood w atch program, and works to improve the overall resilience of the City of Eastvale. The purpose is to collaborate with our Community to create lively, livable spaces and places.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associat ed with the Code Enforcement. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The services included in Code Enforcement are a mix ture of fines and user fees. Fines are set to deter the listed activities, and the analysis of the user fee relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each f ee occurrence using staff time to recover the direc t cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services.

Willdan then compared the calculated full cost agai nst the current fee amount to determine, if charged , whether the current fee is recovering the costs ass ociated with the requested service. The analysis fo und that most flat rate fees are currently set below th e full cost of providing the service. Staff have su ggested reasonable fee adjustments to the fee schedule, and they are detailed in Appendix C . As a result, there would be:
 An increase for 3 fees;
 2 new fees, Reinspection fee and Written Demands for Lien Release, would be added, and;  13 fees would remain as currently set as detailed in Appendix C .

624

15 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Engineering
Public Works Division is committed to the maintenan ce and operation of the City of Eastvale’s infrastructure. This includes ensuring the safety and quality of streets, sidewalks, traffic signals, street lights, traffic signs, and storm drain inlets. Through init iatives such as the Capital Improvement Program, th ey actively improve the City’s infrastructure.

The Engineering Division is responsible for the des ign and construction of private development and capital/public projects. The division collects deve lopment fees, process permits, and provides inspect ions for a variety of construction and non-construction activities within the public right-of-way. The priv ate development services we offer ensure compliance wit h City Codes and reviews the development process.

They also work closely with Federal, State, County, and public utility agencies where they are respons ible for the management of grant-funded projects and programs.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Engineering Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Engineering Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occur rence using staff time to recover the direct cost o f staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whethe r the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that current fee levels are subsidizing the cost for most servic es. It is recommended that the City increase most Public Works Services fees to improve cost recovery as det ailed in Appendix C , with some specific fees set to retain subsidies. As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 11 fees;
 9 fees would decrease;
 32 new fees would be added;
 3 fees would change from Hourly Rate to Actual Cost/Deposit;  3 fees would remain as currently set, and;
 the average increase for current fees would be around 2% for flat fee services.

625

16 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Finance
The Finance Department’s role is to manage and main tain financial records in conformity with generally accepted governmental accounting principles and in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. The department accounts for all revenues and expenditur es, monitors internal controls, and processes warrants. Additionally, the department oversees the investment of public funds and cash management. The department prepares the annual Comprehensive Annual Financial Report in conjunction with, and subject to, the opinion of the City’s independent audit fir m. Under direction of the City Manager, the departm ent prepares the City’s annual budget and mid-year revi ew. Additionally, the department also maintains a financial planning document, allowing the departmen t to simultaneously prepare the budget document and multi-year financial forecasts for all funds. The department prepares quarterly interim financial reports, which are presented to Council four times per fisca l year. The department also prepares monthly investment reports to the City Council. Finance collaborates with the City Manager and all City departments, providing timely financial information and assistan ce to meet the organizational, departmental, and strategic plan objectives.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services associat ed with the Finance Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Finance Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurren ce using staff time to recover the direct cost of s taff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the curre nt fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most flat rate fees are currently set below the full cost of providing the service. The suggested fees in Appendix C were set to limit any fee increase to 50% or the full cost (whichever is less) based on the full cost calculation.

As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 1 fee;
 2 fees would decrease;
 1 new fee, Business License Late Fee, would be added, and;  3 fees would remain as currently set.

626

17 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Fire
Fire services are provided through Riverside County Fire Department/CAL FIRE. The fire department is responsible for providing full-service fire safety, municipal and wildland fire protection, pre-hospit al emergency medical response by paramedics and emergency medical technicians, technical rescue services and response to hazardous materials discharges. Our mission is to provide efficient, effective emergen cy services to the City of Eastvale as part of an integrated, cooperative, regional fire and rescue system.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Fire Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Fire Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurren ce using staff time to recover the direct cost of s taff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the curre nt fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that cur rent fee levels are not in line with the costs of provid ing services. It is recommended that the City adju st most Fire fees to better align with cost recovery of ser vices as detailed in Appendix C , with some specific fees set to retain subsidies as a result of restricting any fee increases to 50%. As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 17 fees;
 67 fees would decrease, and;
 20 new fees would be added.
 The average fee change for existing services would be a decrease of 36%

627

18 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Planning
The Planning Division is focused on creative urban planning and design solutions that result in a liva ble, high-quality built environment where Eastvale resid ents, businesses and visitors can live, work and pl ay.

The Division is responsible for three main sections : Advanced Planning, Current Planning, and Public Information. The Advanced Planning section is responsible for implementing the City’s long-range initiatives through the General Plan and Zoning Code, participa ting in regional planning activities, and ensuring that the City remains up to date with regard to state an d federal mandates for planning, zoning and environmental protection. The Current Planning sect ion is responsible for the processing of private development entitlement applications for compliance with City policies and regulations in a timely and consistent manner that delivers results to applican ts. The Public Information section provides the gen eral public with prompt planning and zoning information in response to email, telephone, and over-the-counter inquiries, along with providing administrative appl ication review, such as plan checks. The Division, as a whole, provides staff support to the City Council a nd Planning Commission and coordinates the environmental analysis of proposed public and priva te projects. The Division also coordinates with and supports the work of the Economic Development, Buil ding, Public Works, and Community Enhancement Divisions.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Planning Division. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Planning Services relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurren ce using staff time to recover the direct cost of s taff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calculated full cost against the curre nt fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is recovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that most flat rate fees are currently set below the full cost of providing the service. The suggested fees in Appendix C were set to limit any fee increase to 50% or the full cost (whichever is less) based on the full cost calculation.

As a result, there would be:
 an increase to 17 fees;
 11 fees would decrease;
 3 fees would remain as currently set;
 9 new fees would be added, and;
 the average estimated fee increase would be around 2%.

628

19 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Community Safety
The Eastvale Community Safety Department encompasse s services for Building and Safety, Community Enhancement and Safety, Waste and Recycling, and Emergency Management.

The Community Safety Department focuses on the safe ty and accessibility of residents by providing the highest safety and quality of life standards in Eastvale.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and prog rams associated with the Community Safety Department. The review also consisted of an evaluat ion of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Community Safety Services relied pr imarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach , whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each f ee occurrence using staff time to recover the direc t cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services.

Willdan then compared the calculated full cost agai nst the current fee amount to determine, if charged , whether the current fee is recovering the costs ass ociated with the requested service. The analysis fo und that most flat rate fees are currently set below the full cost of providing the service. It is recommended that the City increase cost recovery to 100% for Communi ty Safety services as detailed in Appendix C . As a
result, there would be:
 an increase to 1 fee, and;
 3 new fees would be added.

629

20 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Police
The Police department is responsible for providing full-service public safety in the form of first res ponder, investigative services, community-oriented policing , traffic team, gang and narcotic enforcement, crim e prevention, forensic services, administrative services and a volunteer program. Our mission is to meet the mandates prescribed by law, provide progressive, in novative and efficient public safety, while working in partnership with the community we serve and allied agencies.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and programs associated with the Police Department. The review also consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of Police Services for Towed Vehicle R elease Fee relied primarily upon a standard unit co st build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Willdan then compared the calcul ated full cost against the current fee amount to determine, if charged, whether the current fee is r ecovering the costs associated with the requested service. The analysis found that the flat rate fee is currently set below the full cost of providing the service.

It is recommended that the City increase the Towed Vehicle Release Fee from $151 to $170 as detailed i n Appendix C . The remaining Report Fee will remain as currently set.

630

21 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Special Events
Special Events permits for the City of Eastvale.

Analysis
Willdan individually reviewed the services and prog rams associated with Special Events. The review al so consisted of an evaluation of existing services in an effort to update the fee schedule.

The analysis of the new 16 fees for Special Events relied primarily upon a standard unit cost build-up approach, whereby we determined the reasonable cost of each fee occurrence using staff time to recover the direct cost of staff and the pro-rata share of departmental costs, including indirect costs for City Central Services. Staff is recommending the suggested fee amounts as detailed in Appendix C , with all fees set to retain some level of subsidy.

631

22 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Appendix A – Total Allowable Cost to be Recovered
Below are the total allowable costs that may be recovered through User Fees; however, only a percentage of the total cost is realized as staff doesn’t just work on services related to User Fees, but also wo rk on an array of other City functions during the operationa l hours of the City. The amounts listed below will not reconcile to City budgets as costs that should not be included in overhead for personnel in the application of determining fully burdened hourly rates were exc luded. Examples of these costs are capital, debt, monetary transfers, passthrough contract costs.

City of Eastvale - User Fee
Overhead Rate Calculations
Department Total Personnel
Department
Operations &
Administration
Direct
Overhead
%
Indirect
Allocation
%
100: City Clerk 446,151 24,900 6% 0% 100: City Manager 496,064 8,500 2% 0% 100: COMMUNICATIONS 320,736 14,980 5% 0% 100: Community Development Admin 808,480 85,970 11% 43% 100: Community Development Planning 583,268 15,980 3% 43% 100: Community Safety Admin 482,356 150,670 31% 53% 100: Community Safety Building 1,046,636 41,750 4% 53% 100: Community Safety CES 664,684 64,100 10% 53% 100: Finance 878,561 65,280 7% 0% 100: Events 428,248 7,920 2% 20% 100: Public Works 442,126 124,750 28% 12% 100: Facility Maintenance 77,087 32,500 42% 0% 100: Landscape Maintenance 77,087 9,000 12% 0% 100: Public Works Engineering 1,366,185 18,330 1% 12% 100: Human Resources 486,319 25,710 5% 0% 100: ITS 49,764 19,500 39% 0% 632

23 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Appendix B – Fully Burdened Hourly Rates
Below are fully burdened hourly rates of staff positions that provide for the services detailed in Appendix C. The FBHRs were used to determine the full cost of each service. They include the salary and benefit costs for each position as well as all applicable overhead amount s for each position. When a central service department position works on a fee or project in the purv iew of an operating department, the overhead rates of the operating department (shown in Appendix A ) will be applied to that central service positions’ salary and benefit rate for full cost recovery since indirect overhead cost only applies to non-central service functions of the City. For any user fee service reque st that is outside the scope of the fees detailed in Appendix C , or for services for which there is no fee currently set, the City can charge up to the full cost of the FBHR for personnel involved.

City of Eastvale - User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Position
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: Community Development Admin CD - Community Development Director $247.48 100: Community Development Admin CD - Economic Development Manager $159.33 100: Community Development Admin CD - Intern $88.23
100: Community Development Admin CD - Management Assistant $92.56 100: Community Development Admin CD - Senior Administrative Specialist $98.64 100: Community Development Admin CD - Senior Management Analyst $147.16 100: Community Development Planning CDPlan - Associate Planner $135.82 100: Community Development Planning CDPlan - City Planner $192.02 100: Community Development Planning CDPlan - Intern $81.94 100: Community Development Planning CDPlan - Planning Technician $94.51 100: Community Development Planning CDPlan - Senior Planner $148.66 100: City Clerk Clerk - Administrative Specialist $47.70 100: City Clerk Clerk - Assistant City Clerk $87.81
100: City Clerk Clerk - City Clerk/Communications Director $165.66 100: City Clerk Clerk - Deputy City Clerk $77.32
100: City Manager CM - Assistant to the City Manager $118.08 100: City Manager CM - City Manager $14.60
100: City Manager CM - Intern $56.84
100: COMMUNICATIONS Comm - City Clerk/Communications Director $164.23 100: COMMUNICATIONS Comm - Communications Officer $71.16 100: COMMUNICATIONS Comm - Communitications Specialist $61.36 100: Community Safety Admin CS - Community Safety Director $301.21 100: Community Safety Admin CS - Emergency Management Specialist $134.27 633

24 Comprehensive User Fee Study

City of Eastvale - User Fee
Fully Burdened Hourly Rate Calculation
Department Position
Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate
100: Community Safety Admin CS - Environmental Compliance Analyst $136.45 100: Community Safety Admin CS - Intern $112.16
100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Building Inspector I $93.24 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Building Inspector II $102.89 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Building Official $208.96 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Permit Specialist $86.95 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Permit Technician $85.56 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Plans Examiner $113.58 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Senior Building Inspector $119.34 100: Community Safety Building CSBuild - Senior Permit Technician $130.96 100: Community Safety CES CSCES - Community Enhancement & Safety Manager $192.12 100: Community Safety CES CSCES - Community Enhancement & Safety Officer $97.15 100: Community Safety CES CSCES - Senior Administative Specialist $92.72 100: Community Safety CES CSCES - Senior Community Enhancement & Safety Offic er $116.69 100: Events Event - Community Services Coordinator $64.78 100: Events Event - Community Services Leader $71.63
100: Events Event - Community Services Manager $141.61
100: Facility Maintenance Facil - Maintenance & Operations Manager $143.44 100: Finance Fin - Accountant $62.98
100: Finance Fin - Accounting Technician $61.21
100: Finance Fin - Finance Director/City Treasurer $160.89 100: Finance Fin - Finance Manager $123.08
100: Finance Fin - Intern $60.03
100: Finance Fin - Senior Accountant $81.39
100: Finance Fin - Senior Accounting Technician $73.37
100: Human Resources HR - Deputy Human Resources Director $151.99 100: Human Resources HR - Human Resources & Risk Analyst $87.56 100: Human Resources HR - Human Resources Technician $65.77 100: Human Resources HR - Payroll Coordinator $61.72
100: ITS ITS - City Clerk/Communications Director $218.38 100: Landscape Maintenance Land - Maintenance & Operations Manager $112.68 100: Public Works PW - Maintenance Coordinator $88.70
100: Public Works PW - Public Works Superintendent $125.34 100: Public Works PW - Senior Construction Inspector $108.07 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Assistant Engineer $89.75 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Associate Engineer $115.71 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Engineering Technician $63.52 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Management Analyst $85.57 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Principal Engineer $149.58 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Public Works Director/City Engineer $186.89 100: Public Works Engineering PWEng - Senior Engineer $131.22 634

25 Comprehensive User Fee Study

Appendix C – Cost Recovery Analysis
The following tables provide the results of the analysis, re sulting full cost recovery amount, and recommended fees. For fees, services, and penalties in w hich the full cost, existing fee and suggested fee is listed as “NA”, the amount or percentage was not calculable based on cost data or variable fee structure.

This is most common when either the current or the sugge sted fee includes a variable component that is not comparable on a one-to-one basis, a full cost was n ot calculated (for penalties, fines, market-based fees, or items not included in the study), or when there is not a current fee amount to compare against.

All services and fees analyzed as part of this study fall under one or multiple categories one through five of the exemptions defined in Proposition 26. As such a cost analysis was performed to calculate the estimated reasonable full cost of each service, and suggested fees are recommended at or below those amounts.

Estimated reasonable full costs were calculated based on City expenditures and time estimates.

To provide a thorough list of all fees and services, the schedules also includes items that were not part of the scope of this study. Examples of such items are u tility rates, taxes, in-lieu fees, and developer impact fees.

635
Building Safety
# Fee Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Processing Cost Plan Check Cost Permitting Cost Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested
Processing Fee
Suggested Plan
Check Fee Suggested Permit Fee Suggested Full Cost Unit Fee Δ 1 Residential Permit Fees
2 Addressing - (individual lot} 195.00 NA NA NA NA NA $0.00 $0.00 $195.00 $195.00 $0.00 3 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) 291.00 $42.02 $0.00 $74.35 $116.36 0% $42.00 $0.00 $7 4.00 $116.00 -$175.00 4 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (2001 - 50 00 sq ft) New $84.03 $0.00 $111.52 $195.55 0% $84.00 $0.00 $ 111.00 $195.00 NA 5 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (5001 sq f t and greater) New $84.03 $0.00 $148.70 $232.73 0% $84.00 $ 0.00 $148.00 $232.00 NA 6 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) New $126.05 $0.00 $111.52 $237.57 0% $126.00 $0.00 $111. 00 $237.00 NA 7 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq ft) New $126.05 $0.00 $148.70 $274.74 0% $126.00 $0.00 $1 48.00 $274.00 NA 8 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (5001 sq ft a nd greater) New $126.05 $0.00 $185.87 $311.92 0% $126.00 $0 .00 $185.00 $311.00 NA 9 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft ) New $84.03 $0.00 $74.35 $158.38 0% $84.00 $0.00 $74.00 $158 .00 NA 10 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (2001 - 5000 s q ft) New $84.03 $0.00 $111.52 $195.55 0% $84.00 $0.00 $111. 00 $195.00 NA 11 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (5001 sq ft an d greater) New $84.03 $0.00 $148.70 $232.73 0% $84.00 $0.00 $148.00 $232.00 NA 12 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) N ew $126.05 $0.00 $111.52 $237.57 0% $126.00 $0.00 $111.00 $2 37.00 NA 13 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq f t) New $126.05 $0.00 $148.70 $274.74 0% $126.00 $0.00 $148.0 0 $274.00 NA 14 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (5001 sq ft and g reater) New $126.05 $0.00 $185.87 $311.92 0% $126.00 $0.00 $ 185.00 $311.00 NA 15 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (1 - 2000 sq ft) New $126.05 $0.00 $111.52 $237.57 0% $126.00 $0.00 $111.00 $ 237.00 NA 16 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (2001 - 5000 sq ft) New $126.05 $0.00 $148.70 $274.74 0% $126.00 $0.00 $148. 00 $274.00 NA 17 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (5001 sq ft and greater) New $126.05 $0.00 $185.87 $311.92 0% $126.00 $0.00 $185.00 $311.00 NA 18 ReRoof - Tile (1 - 2000 sq ft) New $126.05 $108.90 $111.52 $346.47 0% $126.00 $108.00 $111 .00 $345.00 NA 19 ReRoof - Tile (2001 - 5000 sq ft) New $126.05 $163.3 4 $148.70 $438.09 0% $126.00 $163.00 $148.00 $437.00 NA 20 ReRoof - Tile (5001 sq ft and greater) New $126.05 $ 217.79 $185.87 $529.71 0% $126.00 $217.00 $185.00 $528.00 NA 21 Garden Wall-(block) - up to l00 linear feet or in dividual lot 458.00 $42.02 $54.45 $148.70 $245.16 0% $42.0 0 $54.00 $148.00 $244.00 -$310.00 22 Each additional 50 linear feet or fraction thereo f 120.00 $42.02 $54.45 $148.70 $245.16 0% $42.00 $54.00 $148 .00 $244.00 $28.00 23 Swimming Pool (Fiberglass with no Heater) New $168. 06 $217.79 $520.43 $906.29 0% $168.00 $217.00 $520.00 $905. 00 NA 24 Swimming Pool (Vinyl with no Heater) New $168.06 $21 7.79 $520.43 $906.29 0% $168.00 $217.00 $520.00 $905.00 NA 25 Swimming Pool (Plaster with Heater) New $168.06 $490 .03 $594.78 $1,252.88 0% $168.00 $490.00 $594.00 $1,252.00 NA 26 Swimming Pool (Fiberglass with Heater) New $168.06 $ 272.24 $594.78 $1,035.09 0% $168.00 $272.00 $594.00 $1,034 .00 NA 27 Swimming Pool (Vinyl with Heater) New $168.06 $272.2 4 $594.78 $1,035.09 0% $168.00 $272.00 $594.00 $1,034.00 NA 28 Window or Door, upgrade or addition (Replacement pe r Window or Door) 406.00 $42.02 $54.45 $111.52 $207.99 0% $42.00 $54.00 $111. 00 $207.00 -$199.00 29 Window or Door (New) New $126.05 $217.79 $297.39 $641.23 0% $126.00 $217.00 $297 .00 $640.00 NA 30 Commercial/Industrial Permit Fees
31 Duplication of Certificate of Occupancy 239.00 $168 .06 $0.00 $0.00 $168.06 0% $168.00 $0.00 $0.00 $168.00 -$71.00 32 Sign, each Building Only 473.00 $42.02 $108.90 $148.70 $299.61 1% $42.00 $108.00 $14 8.00 $298.00 -$175.00 33 Electrical
34 Special branch circuit 120.00 $42.02 $0.00 $111.52 $153.54 0% $42.00 $0.00 $111.00 $153.00 $33.00 35 Electric Service New or Replacement (1-400 Amp) 31 2.00 $42.02 $0.00 $111.52 $153.54 0% $42.00 $0.00 $111.00 $1 53.00 -$159.00 36 Electric Service New or Replacement (401-1000 Amp ) New $168.06 $217.79 $223.04 $608.90 0% $168.00 $217.00 $22 3.00 $608.00 NA 37 Electric Service New or Replacement (1001 amps an d Greater) New $168.06 $326.69 $371.74 $866.49 0% $168.00 $ 326.00 $371.00 $865.00 NA 38 Electric Vehicle Charging Station, free standing 3 59.00 $168.06 $108.90 $111.52 $388.48 0% $168.00 $108.00 $1 11.00 $387.00 $28.00 39 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Wall mounted 239 .00 $42.02 $108.90 $111.52 $262.43 1% $42.00 $108.00 $111.0 0 $261.00 $22.00 40 Residential Electrical Appliance 3HP or less New $4 2.02 $0.00 $74.35 $116.36 0% $42.00 $0.00 $74.00 $116.00 NA 41 Residential Electrical Appliance Over 3HP New $42.0 2 $0.00 $111.52 $153.54 0% $42.00 $0.00 $111.00 $153.00 NA 42 Commercial/Industrial Type Appliance (rating in h orsepower or kilowatts, or kilovolt-amperes) 43 Up to and including 1 203.00 $42.02 $54.45 $74.35 $170.81 0% $42.00 $54.00 $74.00 $170.00 -$33.00 44 Over 1 not over 10 239.00 $42.02 $54.45 $148.70 $245.16 0% $42.00 $54.00 $148. 00 $244.00 $5.00 45 Over 10 not over 50 321.00 $42.02 $108.90 $148.70 $299.61 1% $42.00 $108.00 $14 8.00 $298.00 -$23.00 46 Over 50 not over 100 442.00 $84.03 $108.90 $148.70 $341.62 0% $84.00 $108.00 $14 8.00 $340.00 -$102.00 47 Over 100 608.00 $84.03 $108.90 $223.04 $415.97 0% $84.00 $108.00 $22 3.00 $415.00 -$193.00 48 Electric Vehicle Charging Station, free standing 3 59.00 $42.02 $54.45 $74.35 $170.81 0% $42.00 $54.00 $74.00 $ 170.00 -$189.00 49 Wall mounted 239.00 $42.02 $54.45 $74.35 $170.81 0% $42.00 $54.00 $74.00 $170.00 -$69.00 50 Temporary Lighting System (Christmas tree lots, pumpkin patches, etc.) 203.00 $42.02 $54.45 $74.35 $170.81 0% $42.00 $54.00 $74.00 $170.00 -$33.00 51 Temporary Power each, service pole or pedestal 166 .00 $42.02 $0.00 $74.35 $116.36 0% $42.00 $0.00 $74.00 $116. 00 -$50.00 52 Each additional pole in a single installation 83.0 0 $42.02 $0.00 $37.17 $79.19 0% $42.00 $0.00 $37.00 $79.00 -$4.00 53 Receptacles, Switches and Lights 1-20 Fixtures New Per Fixture $42.02 $0.00 $1.86 $79.19 45% $42.00 $0.00 $1.8 5 $43.85 NA 54 Receptacles, Switches and Lights 21 0r More Fixtu res New Per Fixture $42.02 $0.00 $1.86 $79.19 45% $42.00 $0. 00 $1.85 $43.85 NA 55 Generators up to 150 kw New $168.06 $435.58 $297.39 $901.04 0% $168.00 $435.00 $297 .00 $900.00 NA 56 Generators over 150 kw New $168.06 $653.37 $446.09 $1,267.52 0% $168.00 $653.00 $4 46.00 $1,267.00 NA 57 Photovoltaic Systems Roof Mounted State Assembly Bill 1124 58 Residential 15 kW and Under 450.00 max $126.05 NA $281.94 NA NA 126.00 0.00 282.00 $408.0 0 max -$42.00 59 Residential Over 15kW 450.00
plus $15 per kW
over 15 kW $126.05 $145.00 $281.94 NA NA 126.00 42.00 282.00 $450.00 pl us $15 per kW over 15 kW $0.00 60 Commercial 50 kW and Under 1,000.00 max $126.05 $217.50 $656.45 NA NA 126.00 217.50 656 .00 $999.50 max -$0.50 61 Commercial 51-250 kW 1,000.00 plus $7 per kW
over 51 kW $210.08 $290.00 $499.92 NA NA 210.00 290.00 500.00 $1,000.0 0 plus $7 per kW over 51 kW $0.00 62 Commercial Over 250 kW 1,000.00 plus $5 per kW
over 250 kW $294.11 $362.50 $637.50 NA NA 210.00 290.00 500.00 $1,000.0 0 plus $5 per kW over 250 kW $0.00 26 636
Building Safety
# Fee Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Processing Cost Plan Check Cost Permitting Cost Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested
Processing Fee
Suggested Plan
Check Fee Suggested Permit Fee Suggested Full Cost Unit Fee Δ 63 Photovoltaic Systems Ground Mounted State Assembly Bill 1124 64 Residential 15 kW and Under New $168.06 $217.79 $148.70 $534.55 16% $141.00 $184.00 $12 5.00 $450.00 max NA 65 Residential Over 15kW New $168.06 $326.69 $223.04 $717.79 37% $141.00 $184.00 $12 5.00 $450.00 plus $15 per kW over 15 kW NA 66 Commercial 50 kW and Under New $168.06 $326.69 $223.04 $717.79 0% $168.00 $326.00 $223 .00 $717.00 max NA 67 Commercial 51-250 kW New $252.10 $544.48 $371.74 $1,168.31 14% $216.00 $466.00 $ 318.00 $1,000.00 plus $7 per kW over 51 kW NA 68 Commercial Over 250 kW New $336.13 $762.27 $520.43 $1,618.83 38% $216.00 $466.00 $ 318.00 $1,000.00 plus $5 per kW over 250 kW NA 69 Plumbing
70 Residential Natural Gas Piping, up to 4 Outlets 20 3.00 $42.02 $0.00 $297.39 $339.41 0% $42.00 $0.00 $297.00 $3 39.00 $136.00 71 Residential Natural Gas Piping, 5 or More Outlets New Per Fixture $55.46 $0.00 $74.35 $427.20 70% $55.00 $0.0 0 $74.00 $129.00 NA 72 Commercial Natural Gas Piping, up to 4 Outlets New $42.02 $435.58 $371.74 $849.34 0% $42.00 $435.00 $371.00 $8 48.00 NA 73 Commercial Natural Gas Piping, 5 or More Outlets N ew Per Fixture $55.46 $130.67 $104.09 $1,229.27 76% $55.00 $130.00 $104.00 $289.00 NA 74 Sewer Lateral per Building (new or replacement) 12 0.00 $42.02 $435.58 $371.74 $849.34 0% $42.00 $435.00 $371. 00 $848.00 $728.00 75 Water Heater Replacement 120.00 $42.02 $0.00 $148.70 $190.71 0% $42.00 $0.00 $148.00 $190.00 $70.00 76 Plumbing Fixture or Trap, each Residential 120.00 $ 42.02 $0.00 $74.35 $116.36 0% $42.00 $0.00 $74.00 $116.00 -$4.00 77 Plumbing Fixture or Trap, each Commercial New $42.0 2 $326.69 $111.52 $480.22 0% $42.00 $326.00 $111.00 $479.00 NA 78 Interceptor, Pretreatment, each 239.00 $42.02 $544.4 8 $371.74 $958.23 0% $42.00 $544.00 $371.00 $957.00 $718.00 79 Process Piping System up to 5 outlets 312.00 $42.02 $435.58 $371.74 $849.34 0% $42.00 $435.00 $371.00 $848.00 $536.00 80 Each additional outlet 41.50 $42.02 $108.90 $74.35 $225.26 1% $42.00 $108.00 $74.0 0 $224.00 $182.50 81 Grease Trap New $42.02 $326.69 $148.70 $517.40 0% $42.00 $326.00 $148.0 0 $516.00 NA 82 Solar Potable Water Heating System New $42.02 $435.5 8 $297.39 $774.99 0% $42.00 $435.00 $297.00 $774.00 NA 83 Sewer Cap New $42.02 $0.00 $148.70 $190.71 0% $42.00 $0.00 $148.00 $19 0.00 NA 84 Roof Drain/Rain Water Leaders New $42.02 $326.69 $148 .70 $517.40 0% $42.00 $326.00 $148.00 $516.00 NA 85 Water Heater New New $42.02 $326.69 $148.70 $517.40 0% $42.00 $326.00 $148.0 0 $516.00 NA 86 Water Main/Supply, 1 1/2" and Under New $42.02 $326 .69 $148.70 $517.40 0% $42.00 $326.00 $148.00 $516.00 NA 87 Water Main/Supply, 1 3/4" to 3" New $42.02 $435.58 $2 97.39 $774.99 0% $42.00 $435.00 $297.00 $774.00 NA 88 Water Main/Supply 3" and Above New $42.02 $653.37 $44 6.09 $1,141.48 0% $42.00 $653.00 $446.00 $1,141.00 NA 89 Gray Water/Irrigation Systems New $42.02 $435.58 $446.09 $923.68 0% $42.00 $435.00 $446.0 0 $923.00 NA 90 Septic Tank Abatement New $42.02 $0.00 $148.70 $190.71 0% $42.00 $0.00 $148.00 $19 0.00 NA 91 Mechanical
92 HVAC Units - up to 150,000 CFM (Residential Replace ment Same Location Except on Roof) 203.00 $84.03 $0.00 $111.52 $195.55 0% $84.00 $0.00 $111.00 $195.00 -$8.00 93 HVAC Units - up to 150,000 CFM (Commercial Replacement Same Location Except on Roof) New $84.03 $0.00 $223.04 $307.08 0% $84.00 $0.00 $223.00 $30 7.00 NA 94 HVAC Units Residential New (Roof) - up to 150,000 CFM New $55.46 $108.90 $111.52 $275.88 1% $55.00 $108.00 $1 11.00 $274.00 NA 95 HVAC Units Residential New (Ground) - up to 150,0 00 CFM New $84.03 $0.00 $111.52 $195.55 0% $84.00 $0.00 $111 .00 $195.00 NA 96 HVAC Units Commercial New (Roof) - up to 150,000 CFM New $55.46 $108.90 $223.04 $387.40 0% $55.00 $108.00 $22 3.00 $386.00 NA 97 HVAC Units Commercial New (Ground) - up to 150,00 0 CFM New $84.03 $0.00 $223.04 $307.08 0% $84.00 $0.00 $223. 00 $307.00 NA 98 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Replacement (Commercial Replacement Same Location Except on Roof) 322.00 $42.02 $54.45 $74.35 $170.81 0% $42.00 $54.00 $74.00 $170.00 -$152.00 99 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Commercial New (Roo f) New $55.46 $108.90 $223.04 $387.40 0% $55.00 $108.00 $223 .00 $386.00 NA 100 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Commercial New (Gr ound) New $55.46 $0.00 $223.04 $278.50 0% $55.00 $0.00 $223. 00 $278.00 NA 101 Returns and Supplies Each (Duct Work) New $55.46 $0 .00 $74.35 $129.81 1% $55.00 $0.00 $74.00 $129.00 NA 102 Cooling Tower New $55.46 $435.58 $446.09 $937.13 0% $55.00 $435.00 $446.0 0 $936.00 NA 103 Decorative Gas Appliance New $55.46 $0.00 $223.04 $278.50 0% $55.00 $0.00 $223.00 $27 8.00 NA 104 Exhaust Duct Type 2 New $55.46 $1,088.95 $446.09 $1,590.50 0% $55.00 $1,088.00 $446.00 $1,589.00 NA 105 Exhaust Hood System, Type 1 312.00 $84.03 $1,088.95 $594.78 $1,767.77 0% $84.00 $1,088 .00 $594.00 $1,766.00 $1,454.00 106 Ventilation System, each, not part of a heating or cooling system 276.00 $84.03 $435.58 $446.09 $965.70 0 % $84.00 $435.00 $446.00 $965.00 $689.00 107 Exhaust Fan New $55.46 $435.58 $446.09 $937.13 0% $55.00 $435.00 $446.0 0 $936.00 NA 108 MISCELLANEOUS
109 Special Inspection 295.80 Per Hour. Half
Hour minimum $42.02 $0.00 $74.35 $116.36 0% $42.00 $0.00 $74.00 $116.00 -$179.80 110 Temporary Event 397.39 Per Hour. 2
Hour Minimum $84.03 $653.37 $297.39 $1,332.19 22% $84.00 $653.00 $297.0 0 $1,034.00 $636.61 111 Tower, Cell or Radio 2,120.89 $42.02 $871.16 $446.09 $1,359.27 0% $42.00 $871.0 0 $446.00 $1,359.00 -$761.89 112 Duplicate Job Card 73.00 $42.02 $0.00 $148.70 $190.71 0% $42.00 $0.00 $148.00 $ 190.00 $117.00 113 Permit Issuance- (collected for each fixed fee p ermit issued) 49.00 per half hr $84.03 $0.00 $0.00 $84.03 0% $84.00 $0.00 $0.00 $84.00 $35.00 27 637
Building Safety
# Fee Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Processing Cost Plan Check Cost Permitting Cost Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested
Processing Fee
Suggested Plan
Check Fee Suggested Permit Fee Suggested Full Cost Unit Fee Δ 114 Plan Check Fee -(per hour) 146.00 $0.00 $217.79 $0.00 $217.79 0% $0.00 $217.00 $0.00 $2 17.00 $71.00 115 Re-inspection Fee -(hour) 65.00 $0.00 $0.00 $148.70 $148.70 0% $0.00 $0.00 $148.00 $14 8.00 $83.00 116 General Plan Update Fee New
% of Building,
Planning,
Engineering
Fees

4.2% NA NA 2.1% NA NA $0.02 % of Building, Planning,
Engineering Fees NA
117 Technology Fee New
% of Building,
Planning,
Engineering
Fees

7.6% NA NA 7.5% NA NA $0.08 % of Building, Planning,
Engineering Fees NA
118 Plan Duplication/Reproduction New per request NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Actual Cost $0.00 NA 119 Commercial Hourly Inspection Rates
120 Building 295.80 $0.00 $0.00 $148.70 $148.70 0% $0.00 $0.00 $148.00 $1 48.00 -$147.80 121 Electrical 378.32 $0.00 $0.00 $148.70 $148.70 0% $0.00 $0.00 $148.00 $1 48.00 -$230.32 122 Mechanical 396.39 $0.00 $0.00 $148.70 $148.70 0% $0.00 $0.00 $148.00 $1 48.00 -$248.39 123 Plumbing 396.07 $0.00 $0.00 $148.70 $148.70 0% $0.00 $0.00 $148.00 $1 48.00 -$248.07 124 Green Fee $1.00 per $25k
valuation NA NA NA NA NA $124.00 Green Fee $1.00 per $25k valuation $124.00 $0.00
125 Seismic Fee Residential "=valuation *

0.00013" NA NA NA NA NA $125.00 Seismic Fee
Residential
"=valuation *

0.00013" $125.00 $0.00
126 Seismic Fee Commercial "=valuation *

0.00028" NA NA NA NA NA $126.00 Seismic Fee
Commercial
"=valuation *

0.00028" $126.00 $0.00
28 638
Minimum
Value
Maximum
Value
Suggested Base
Rate
Suggested
Plus $$ For every
0 5,000 $258.60 $0.00 0
5,001 25,000 $258.60 $0.52 100
25,001 100,000 $362.53 $8.06 1,000
100,001 250,000 $966.72 $9.67 1,000
250,001 500,000 $2,416.77 $7.73 1,000
500,001 + $4,350.19 $5.80 1,000
Cost Recovery Level = 100%
Building Valuation Table
Current (All New Construction)
29 639
City Clerk
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee RecommendationFee Δ 1 Passports
2 Adult Applicants (16 and over)
3 First-time Adult
Passport Book 130.00 NA NA $130.00 $0.00
4 First-time Adult
Passport Card 30.00 NA NA $30.00 $0.00
5 First-time Adult
Passport Book & Card 160.00 NA NA $160.00 $0.00
6 Executive Fee
(Acceptance Fee 35.00 NA NA $35.00 $0.00
7 All Minor Applicants (16 and under)
8 Minor Passport Book 100.00 NA NA $100.00 $0.00
9 Minor Passport Card 15.00 NA NA $15.00 $0.00
10 Minor Passport Book &
Card 115.00 NA NA $115.00 $0.00
11 Executive Fee
(Acceptance Fee 35.00 NA NA $35.00 $0.00
12 Optional fees
13 Expedite Fee 60.00 Paid per application, in addition to required fees.

Provides faster processing than routine service. NA NA $60.00 $0.00 14 1-2 day delivery 17.56
Paid per application for 1-2 day delivery of an
issued passport book from the Department of
State to the customer. Only applies to mailing
addresses within the United States. Not valid for
passport cards.

NA NA $17.56 $0.00
15 File Search Fee 150.00
A file search is necessary when an applicant is
unable to present evidence of U.S. citizenship or
verification of a previously issued U.S. Passport or
Consular Report of Birth Abroad. Applicant must
submit Form DS-11 and a written request for a
file search.

NA NA $150.00 $0.00
16 Adult Renewals (16 and over)
17 Adult Passport Book 130.00 NA NA $130.00 $0.00
18 Adult Passport Card 30.00 NA NA $30.00 $0.00
19 Adult Passport Book &
Card 160.00 NA NA $160.00 $0.00
20 Passport Application
Fee 35.00 NA NA $35.00 $0.00
21 Passport Photo Fee 10.00 $7.95 12% $7.00 -$3.00
30 640
City Clerk
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee RecommendationFee Δ 22 MISCELLANEOUS
23 Publicaton Fee: Public
Hearing New Each NA NA Actual Costs NA
24 Notary Fee 15.00 Per Signature $0.00 NA $15.00 $0.00 25 Candidate Filing Fee 25.00 Each $0.00 NA $25.00 $0.00 26 Reproduction: Copies
(B&W) New Per Page $0.10 NA $0.10 NA
27 Reproduction: Copies
(Color) New Per Page $0.25 NA $0.25 NA
28 Reproduction: CD New Each $10.00 NA $10.00 NA
29 Reproduction: DVD New Each $15.00 NA $15.00 NA
31 641
Code Enforcement
# Fee Description Current Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Vacant Property Registration 83.00 NA NA $83.00 $0.00 2 Removal of Signs 7.00 $23.34 57% $10.00 $3.00
3 Registration of Residential Property in Foreclosure
Program 544.00 NA NA $544.00 $0.00
4 Reinspection Fee New $58.35 1% $58.00 NA
5 Written Demands for Lien Release New county recorder fee + staff time $154.55 0% $154.00 NA 6 Sidewalk Vending
7 Sidewalk Vending Permit 100.00 $177.93 1% $177.00 $77.00 8 Sidewalk Vending Permit Renewal 40.00 $57.03 0% $57.00 $17.00 9 Late Fee 40.00 NA NA $40.00 $0.00
10 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; first
violation 250.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(a) NA NA $250.00 $0.00 11 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; second
violation 500.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(a) NA NA $500.00 $0.00 12 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; third
violation and subsequent violations 1,000.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(a) NA NA $1,000.00 $0.00 13 Fine Reduction: Upon proof of valid permit before fines are due:
first violation
reduced by $100;
$200 for second;
$500 for each
thereafter
per municipal code 6.76.140(a) NA NA
first violation
reduced by $100;
$200 for second;
$500 for each
thereafter
$0.00
14 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) first violation 100.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(b) NA NA $100.00 $0.00 15 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) second violation 200.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(b) NA NA $200.00 $0.00 16 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) third violation 500.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(b) NA NA $500.00 $0.00 17 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) fourth violation and subsequent violations and revocation of
permit
500.00 per municipal code 6.76.140(b) NA NA $500.00 $0.00 18 Fine Reduction: maybe reduced by 20% of original fine 20.00% per municipal code 6.76.140(d) NA NA 20.00% $0.00 19 Cannabis Violation
20 Administrative Fine: Violation of Cannibis 1,000.00 per cannabis plant per municipal code 120.04.150€ NA NA $1,000.00 $0.00 32 642
Engineering
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Plan Check
2 Traffic Study/ Traffic Impact analysis - Review 187.00 hourly Variable NA Actual Cost/Deposit NA
3 Traffic Signals, Signing/Striping, TCP 171.00 hourly Variable NA Actual Cost/Deposit NA
4 Subdivision Map - Review 178.00 hourly Variable NA Actual Cost/Deposit NA
5 Tentative Map Review New Deposit Variable NA Actual Cost NA 6 Final Map Review New Deposit Variable NA Actual Cost NA 7 Dedication/Lot Merger Review New Deposit Variable NA Actual Cost NA 8 Land Development Improvement Plan Check
9 Plan Check Costs New Minimum Deposit NA NA $1,000.00 NA 10 Legal Review New NA NA Hourly Rate NA
11 Special Technical Study Review New Deposit Variable NA Actual Cost NA 12 Permit
13 Transportation Permit
14 Oversize Permit - Annual 90.00 state NA NA $90.00 $0.00 15 Oversize Permit - Single Trip 16.00 state NA NA $16.00 $0.00 16 Encroachment Permit:
17 Encroachment Permit - Regular 242.00 each $162.59 0% $162.00 -$80.00 18 Encroachment Permit - Arterial New each $318.66 0% $318.00 NA 19 Encroachment Permit - Extension New each $31.76 2% $31.00 NA 20 Grading Permit:
21 Rough Grading Permit New each $140.15 0% $140.00 NA
22 Precise Grading Permit New each $140.15 0% $140.00 NA 23 Haul Route Permit
24 51-999 CY New each $342.47 0% $342.00 NA
25 1,000-5,000 CY New each $576.54 0% $576.00 NA
26 5,001-25,000 CY New each $810.62 0% $810.00 NA
27 plus $300 for each additional 5,000 CY over 25,000 CY New each $1,044.69 0% $1,044.00 NA 28 Homeowner Encroachment Permit:
29 curb outlet 219.00 each $114.95 1% $114.00 -$105.00
30 Second Driveway New each $159.83 1% $159.00 NA
31 Minor Work 54.00 each $31.76 2% $31.00 -$23.00
32 Temporary Storage Bin/Dumpster Permit New each $31.76 2% $31.00 NA 33 Inspection
34 Trench Excavation/Back fill/Paving Restoration, up to 100 LF 319.00 min $409.63 0% $409.00 $90.00
35 Plus per LF over 100 LF 1.60 per LF $4.10 22% $3.20 $1.60 33 643
Engineering
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 36 Storm Drains/Culverts/Open Channels, up to 100 LF 319.00 min $585.18 0% $585.00 $266.00 37 Plus per LF over 100 LF 4.79 per LF $5.85 0% $5.85 $1.06 38 Curb, Gutter or combo w/ Earthwork, up to 100 LF 319.00 min $292.59 0% $292.00 -$27.00 39 Plus per LF over 100 LF 1.60 per LF $2.93 0% $2.92 $1.32 40 Traffic Occupancy or Lane Closure requiring signage - Residential 399.00 per day $234.07 0% $234.00 -$165.00
41 Traffic Occupancy or Lane Closure requiring signage - Arterial/Collector New per day $468.15 0% $468.00 NA
42 Sidewalk Closure New $117.04 0% $117.00 NA
43 Curb Ramp including Earthwork 479.00 each $468.15 0% $468.00 -$11.00 44 Sidewalk w/ Earthwork, up to 100 SF 319.00 min $292.59 0% $292.00 -$27.00 45 Plus per SF over 100 SF 1.60 per SF $2.93 0% $2.92 $1.32 46 Driveway Approach w/ Earthwork, up to 100 SF 319.00 min $292.59 0% $292.00 -$27.00 47 Plus per SF over 100 SF 1.60 per SF $2.93 0% $2.92 $1.32 48 Excavation for Small Utility Repair, up to 50 SF 108.00 each $146.30 0% $146.00 $38.00 49 Potholing New per hole $29.26 1% $29.00 NA
50 Additional Inspection Time Required New per hour 4 hour minimum Variable NA Actual Cost NA 51 Overtime (Satruday and Nighwork on weekday) New per hour 4 hour minimum $175.56 0% $175.00 NA 52 Overtime (Sunday) New per hour 4 hour minimum $234.07 0% $234.00 NA 53 Rough Grading Inspection
54 Up to 500 cubic yards (total cut and fill) New min $468.15 0% $468.00 NA 55 Plus per 300 cu.yd. over 500 cu.yd. less than 5,000
cu.yd. New per 300 cu.yd. $234.07 0% $234.00 NA
56 Plus per 1,000 cu.yd. over 1,000 cu.yd. New per 1,000 cu.yd. $46.81 2% $46.00 NA 57 Land Development Improvement Inspections
58 Public Works Inspection New Minimum Deposit Variable NA $10,000.00 NA 59 NPDES Construction Inspection
60 Less than 10 acres New $468.15 0% $468.00 NA
61 10-25 acres New $702.22 0% $702.00 NA
62 Greater than 25 acres New $1,872.59 0% $1,872.00 NA
63 NPDES Business Inspection
64 Late Fee New NA NA $60.00 NA
65 Others / Miscellaneous
66 Certificate of Correction 371.00 each NA NA $371.00 $0.00 67 Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions; Subdivision
Improvement Agreements 576.00 each $641.85 0% $641.00 $65.00 68 General Plan Update Fee New % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees 4.2% 50% 2.1% NA
69 Technology Fee New % of Building, Planning,
Engineering Fees 7.6% 1% 7.5% NA
34 644
Engineering
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 70 Storm Water NPDES Inspections (when necessary as required Stormwater Permit) 71 Commercial 218.00 per inspection $175.56 0% $175.00 -$43.00 72 Industrial 152.00 per inspection $292.59 0% $292.00 $140.00 73 Follow-up 109.00 per inspection $117.04 0% $117.00 $8.00 35 645
Finance
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Business Registration
2 Business Registration Admin
Fee: New 110.00 each $98.52 1% $98.00 -$12.00
3 Business Registration Admin
Fee: Renewal 40.00 each $77.58 23% $60.00 $20.00
4 Business Registration Late Fee New each NA NA $60.00 NA 5 CASP Fee 4.00 each passthrough NA NA $4.00 $0.00
6 Accounts Receivable
7 Late Charge Penalty on
Delinquent Accounts Receivable New
Per Month on all
obligations older than
30 days
NA NA 0.50% NA
8 to NSF Check/Credit Card
Stopped Payment
1st $25, add'l
$35 each $69.46 NA 1st $25, add'l
$35 $0.00
9 Administrative Fees
10 Outgoing Wire/ACH Fee New each + bank fee $52.89 2% $52.00 NA 11 Developer Deposit Processing
Fee 99.00 each $48.48 1% $48.00 -$51.00
12 MSHCP Administrative Fee 39.00 each $86.31 55% $39.00 $0.00 36 646
Fire
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Fire/Life Safety and Operational Permit Fees
2 Aerosol Products 99.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$29.00 3 Amusement Buildings 50.00 annual $111.34 33% $75.00 $25.00 4 Apartment Buildings, 1-14 units 113.00 annual Stated
mandated $70.93 1% $70.00 -$43.00
5 Apartment Buildings, 15-50 units 145.00 annual Stated mandated $106.40 0% $106.00 -$39.00
6 Apartment Buildings, each add'l 50 units 31.00 annual Stated mandated $70.93 35% $46.00 $15.00
7 Energy Storage Systems 85.00 annual $106.40 0% $106.00 $21.00 8 Candles and Open Flames 92.00 per occur $75.87 1% $75.00 -$17.00 9 Carnivals & Fairs 177.00 per event $222.68 0% $222.00 $45.00 10 Cellulous Nitrate 177.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$107.00 11 Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Patch 106.00 per occur $151.75 0% $151.00 $45.00 12 Combustible Fiber Storage/Handling 135.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$65.00 13 Compressed Gases Storage/Handling 92.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$22.00 14 Cryogenic Fluids 99.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$29.00 15 Dry Cleaning Plants 156.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$86.00 16 Combustible Dust Producing Operations 135.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$65.00 17 Explosives and/or Blasting Agents 156.00 per occur $222.68 0% $222.00 $66.00 18 Fireworks Display 241.00 per event $364.55 1% $361.00 $120.00 19 Flammable Combustible Liquids Storage/Handling 220.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$150.00 20 Floor Finishing/Surfacing Operations 106.00 annual $75.87 1% $75.00 -$31.00 21 Fruit & Crop Ripening Facilities 113.00 annual $75.87 1% $75.00 -$38.00 22 Green Waste 135.00 annual $151.75 0% $151.00 $16.00
23 Hazardous Materials Storage or Production 305.00 annual $303.49 0% $303.00 -$2.00 24 High Piled Combustible Storage 0 to 10k sq ft 170.00 annual $151.75 0% $151.00 -$19.00 25 High Piled Combustible Storage 10k to 50k sq ft 234.00 annual $227.62 0% $227.00 -$7.00 26 High Piled Combustible Storage 50lk to 100k sq ft 298.00 annual $263.09 0% $263.00 -$35.00 27 High Piled Combustible Storage 100k+ sq ft 361.00 annual $263.09 0% $263.00 -$98.00 28 High Rise Building 347.00 annual State
Mandated $283.73 0% $283.00 -$64.00
37 647
Fire
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 29 Hospitals 347.00 annual State
Mandated $283.73 0% $283.00 -$64.00
30 Hot Work/Cutting & Welding 64.00 per occur $75.87 1% $75.00 $11.00 31 Jails 432.00 annual State
Mandated $141.87 1% $141.00 -$291.00
32 Liquefied Petroleum Gases 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 33 Lumber Yards 238.00 annual $141.87 1% $141.00 -$97.00 34 Magnesium 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00
35 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage 135.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$65.00 36 Mobile Home Park, 1-14 units 92.00 annual $35.47 1% $35.00 -$57.00 37 Mobile Home Park, 15-50 units 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 38 Mobile Home Park, each add'l 50 units 21.00 annual $70.93 56% $31.00 $10.00 39 Motor Vehicle/Marine Fuel Dispensing Stations 99.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$29.00 40 Organic Coatings 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 41 Industrial Ovens 99.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$29.00 42 Places of Assembly 220.00 annual $141.87 1% $141.00 -$79.00 43 Private Schools 496.00 annual $141.87 1% $141.00 -$355.00 44 Refrigeration Equipment 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 45 Repair Garage and/or Service Garage 177.00 annual $106.40 0% $106.00 -$71.00 46 Residential Care facil: Pre Inspection 92.00 annual $75.87 1% $75.00 -$17.00 47 Residential Care facil: 7+ People 283.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$213.00 48 Special Events: 1-500 Participants 220.00 per event $75.87 1% $75.00 -$145.00 49 Special Events: 501-1,000 Participants 283.00 per event $151.75 0% $151.00 -$132.00 50 Special Events: 1,000+ Participants 347.00 per event $106.40 0% $106.00 -$241.00 51 Spraying or Dipping Finishes 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 52 Temporary Structure: Tent> 200 sq ft. 1,238.00 per occur $70.93 1% $70.00 -$1,168.00 53 Tires: Storage including Scrap & Byproducts 128.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$58.00 54 Waste Materials Handling (Salvage Yard) 220.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$150.00 55 Wood Products Storage 106.00 annual $70.93 1% $70.00 -$36.00 56 Aviation facilities New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
57 Cutting and welding New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
58 Exhibits and trade shows New $141.87 1% $141.00 NA
59 Fire hydrants and valves New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
60 Mobile fueling of hydrogen vehicles New $53.20 0% $53.00 NA 38 648
Fire
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 61 Fumigation and insecticidal fogging New $53.20 0% $53.00 NA 62 HPM (Hazardous production materials) facilities New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA 63 Liquid- or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
64 Mobile food preparation vehicles New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA 65 Open burning New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
66 Open flames and torches New $53.20 0% $53.00 NA
67 Open flames and candles New $53.20 0% $53.00 NA
68 Outdoor assembly event New $141.87 1% $141.00 NA
69 Plant extraction systems New $141.87 1% $141.00 NA
70 Private fire hydrants New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
71 Pyrotechnic special effects material New $141.87 1% $141.00 NA 72 Pyroxylin plastic New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
73 Rooftop heliports New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
74 Tire-rebuilding plants New $141.87 1% $141.00 NA
75 Energy storage systems New $70.93 1% $70.00 NA
76 Fire New Construction Permit Fees
77 New Building
78 1- 10,000 sq ft 298.00 $187.21 0% $187.00 -$111.00
79 10,001- 25,000 sq ft 383.00 $263.09 0% $263.00 -$120.00 80 25,001- 100,000 sq ft 510.00 $338.96 0% $338.00 -$172.00 81 100,001+ sq ft 510.00 per 100,000
sq ft $303.49 0% $303.00 -$207.00
82 Tenant Improvement
83 1- 5,000 sq ft 213.00 $111.34 0% $111.00 -$102.00
84 5,001- 15,000 sq ft 319.00 $187.21 0% $187.00 -$132.00 85 15,001- 30,000 sq ft 446.00 $263.09 0% $263.00 -$183.00 86 30,001- 100,000 sq ft 446.00 $338.96 0% $338.00 -$108.00 87 100,001+ sq ft 446.00 per 100,000
sq ft $303.49 0% $303.00 -$143.00
88 Fire Alarm: Water Flow monitoring 298.00 $111.34 0% $111.00 -$187.00 89 Fire Alarm: Alarm including Voice Evac. 595.00 $222.68 0% $222.00 -$373.00 90 Fire Sprinkler- Commercial
39 649
Fire
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 91 New Construction-per riser 616.00 per riser or
100 heads $187.21 0% $187.00 -$429.00
92 Tenant Improvement 255.00 per riser or
100 heads $151.75 0% $151.00 -$104.00
93 Fire Sprinkler- Residential
94 Multi-Family 13R-per riser 616.00 per riser or
100 heads $187.21 0% $187.00 -$429.00
95 Single Family 13D 213.00 per riser or
100 heads $151.75 0% $151.00 -$62.00
96 Underground Water/Fire Main 213.00 $298.55 0% $298.00 $85.00 97 Standpipe System-per riser 213.00 $187.21 0% $187.00 -$26.00 98 Fire Pump-per system 383.00 $222.68 0% $222.00 -$161.00 99 Underground Tank
100 Underground Tank Removal 241.00 per occur $111.34 0% $111.00 -$130.00 101 Fire Suppression
102 Hood and Duct/Clean Agent- 1st System 213.00 $187.21 0% $187.00 -$26.00 103 Each Additional 43.00 $75.87 16% $64.00 $21.00
104 High Pile Storage $213 - $383 $303.49 0% $303.00 -$80.00 105 Fueling Station (incl. CNG/LPG and Tanks)- per system 255.00 $151.75 0% $151.00 -$104.00 106 Smoke Control Station 213.00 $303.49 0% $303.00 $90.00 107 Spray Booth 170.00 $227.62 0% $227.00 $57.00
108 Hazardous Materials Plan and Storage
109 1-999 sq ft 85.00 $151.75 16% $127.00 $42.00
110 1,000-2,500 sq ft 170.00 $227.62 0% $227.00 $57.00
111 2,501+ sq ft 255.00 $303.49 0% $303.00 $48.00
112 Technical Reports and Research 168.00 per hour $151.75 0% $151.00 -$17.00 113 All Other Plan Reviews and/or Inspections not listed 168.00 per hour $151.75 0% $151.00 -$17.00 40 650
Planning
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Recommendation Fee Δ 1 Planning Applications
2 Pre Application Review 4,336.00 deposit $6,103.25 0% $6,103.00 flat $1,767.00 3 Appeals to Planning Commission/ City Council - General 964.00 $3,856.33 63% $1,446.00 flat $482.00 4 Extension of Time 5,343.00 deposit $2,492.91 0% $2,492.00 flat -$2,851.00 5 Change of Zone 13,610.00 deposit $17,815.10 0% $17,815.00 flat $4,205.00 6 Conditional User Permit 10,331.00 deposit $9,515.95 0% $9,515.00 flat -$816.00 7 Conditional User Permit - Alcohol 10,331.00 deposit $4,233.68 0% $4,233.00 flat -$6,098.00 8 Development Agreement 30,000.00 deposit
Municipal
Code
Section
120.090.040
NA NA $30,000.00 deposit $0.00
9 General Plan Amendment 15,832.00 deposit $10,895.76 0% $10,895.00 deposit -$4,937.00 10 Minor Development Review 4,626.00 deposit $6,628.15 0% $6,628.00 flat $2,002.00 11 Major Development Review (<5 acres or less) 9,555.00 deposit $11,102.83 0% $11,102.00 flat $1,547.00 12 Major Development Review (>5 or more) 9,555.00 deposit $18,271.65 22% $14,332.00 flat $4,777.00 13 Adjustment 241.00 flat $896.79 60% $361.00 flat $120.00 14 Specific Plan 28,992.00 deposit $28,906.42 0% $28,906.00 deposit -$86.00 15 Specific Plan Amendment 23,809.00 deposit $19,860.38 0% $19,860.00 deposit -$3,949.00 16 Temporary Event Permit (Minor) 680.00 $738.07 0% $738.00 flat $58.00 17 Temporary Event Permit (Major) 680.00 $1,476.14 19% $1,200.00 flat $520.00 18 Temporary Use Permit 666.00 deposit $1,476.14 32% $999.00 flat $333.00 19 Sign Program 1,237.00 deposit $1,587.01 0% $1,587.00 flat $350.00 20 Variance 3,750.00 deposit $4,897.57 0% $4,897.00 flat $1,147.00 21 Zoning Confirmation Letter 200.00 deposit $337.68 11% $300.00 flat $100.00 22 Residential Beekeeping New $599.48 0% $599.00 flat NA 23 Accessory Dwelling Unit 750.00 $649.68 0% $649.00 flat -$101.00 24 Landscape Plan review New $3,984.98 0% $3,984.00 flat NA 25 SB 9 - Lot Split New $649.68 0% $649.00 flat NA
26 SB 330 - Housing Streamlining New $649.68 0% $649.00 flat NA 27 Development Code Amendment New $3,740.67 0% $3,740.00 deposit NA 28 Determination of Use New $2,720.90 0% $2,720.00 flat NA 29 Subdivision Applications
30 Certificate of Land Division Compliance - with Waiver of Final Parcel Map 506.00 deposit $935.30 19% $759.00 flat $253.00 31 Lot Line Adjustment 778.00 deposit $1,757.97 34% $1,167.00 flat $389.00 32 Reversion to Acreage 5,000.00 deposit $5,380.09 0% $5,380.00 flat $380.00 33 Tentative Parcel Map 15,000.00 deposit $14,734.88 0% $14,734.00 flat -$266.00 41 651
Planning
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Recommendation Fee Δ 34 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 8,125.00 deposit $7,956.90 0% $7,956.00 flat -$169.00 35 Tentative Tract Map 22,661.00 flat $21,114.76 0% $21,114.00 flat plus $60 per lot fee -$1,547.00 36 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8,840.00 deposit $7,956.90 0% $7,956.00 flat -$884.00 37 Environmental
38 CA Fish & Game Fee - Negative Declaration/EIR see Planning NA NA see Planning $0.00 39 Environmental Impact Report contract+18% NA NA contract+18% deposit $0.00 40 Initial Study/Mitigated Neg Dec 16,621.00 deposit NA NA $24,931.00 deposit $8,310.00 41 Planning Services - General
42 General Plan Update Fee New
% of
Building,
Planning,
Engineering
Fees

4.2% 50% 2.1% % of Building, Planning,
Engineering Fees NA
43 Technology Fee New
% of
Building,
Planning,
Engineering
Fees

7.6% 1% 7.5% % of Building, Planning,
Engineering Fees NA
42 652
Community Safety
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Residential Self-Hauling
2 Residential Self-Hauling Permit Application 265.00 $341.14 NA $341.00 $76.00 43 653
Police
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee Fee Δ 1 Towed Vehicle Release Fee 151.00 $170.00 0% $170.00 $19.00 2 Report Fee 13.00 NA NA $13.00 $0.00
44 654
Special Events
# Fee Description
Current
Fee/Charge Unit Notes Full Cost Subsidy % Suggested Fee* Fee Δ 1 Food Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $232.76 1% $230.00 NA 2 Food Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $97.17 7% $90.00 NA 3 Non-Profit Food Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $181.16 25% $135.00 NA 4 Non-profit Food Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $97.17 31% $67.50 NA 5 Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K +
daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $164.97 3% $160.00 NA 6 Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K +
daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $64.78 7% $60.00 NA 7 Non-Profit Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $132.58 26% $97.50 NA 8 Non-Profit Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $64.78 31% $45.00 NA 9 Information Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K +
daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $132.58 2% $130.00 NA 10 Information Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K +
daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $48.59 18% $40.00 NA 11 Non-Profit Information Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (<5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $116.38 53% $55.00 NA 12 Non-Profit Information Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (>5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $48.59 59% $20.00 NA 13 Food Truck Vendor Fee - Large Event (<5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $132.58 2% $130.00 NA 14 Food Truck Vendor Fee - Small Event (>5K + daily) New Daily Fee per single standard booth space $64.78 7% $60.00 NA 15 Non-Eastvale Resident Event Amenity Admission Fee New Daily Fee use varies per event/amenity $16.20 69% $5.00 NA 16 Non-Eastvale Resident Event Parking Fee New Daily Fee use varies per event/parking lot $16.20 38% $10.00 NA *The City reserves the right to adjust scheduled fees as necessary to cover additional costs to support event operations that often include, but are not limited to:
electricity, private security, traffic control, custodial services, waste disposal, and additional professional services or additional City staff support." 45 655

27368 Via Industria, Suite 200
Temecula, California 92590-4856
800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864
951.587.3500 | Fax: 951.587.3510
www.willdan.com
656
RESOLUTION NO. 24-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADOPTING CERTAIN CITY FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY SERVICES.

WHEREAS, the City Council ("Council") of the City of Eastvale ("City") has established a policy for recovering some portion of the costs reasonably borne by providing special services, including but not limited to planning services, building services, public works services and other miscellaneous city services, of a voluntary or limited nature; and WHEREAS, the City has the authority to impose fees, charges, and rates under its police powers under California Constitution Article XI section 7; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 66016 applies to the adoption or increase of fees for zoning variances, zoning changes, use permits, building inspections, building permits, filing and processing applications and petitions filed with the LAFCO, the processing of subdivision maps, and planning services; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 66018 applies to the adoption or increase of fees to which a specific statutory notice requirement does not apply; and WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 13-26, adopted September 25, 2013, established the City's current user fee schedule, based on the comprehensive user fee study prepared by MGT of America, Inc. to determine the City's costs when providing services to persons for private benefit; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 20-54, adopted July 22, 2020, amended the City's user fee schedule to accurately reflect the labor costs incurred by the city in processing applications for deposit based fees. The resolution allowed for future changes to hourly rates earned by staff and charged by vendors who perform work on projects that are subject to user fees and ensure that the city’s General Fund does not subsidize users of city services that are primarily for private benefit; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale adopted the current user fees by Resolution 13-26 on September 25, 2013 and amended certain developer deposit fees by Resolution 20-54 on July 22, 2020 and these fees remain at the level set in 2013 and 2020 as no annual inflationary method was adopted; and
WHEREAS, the city retained Willdan Financial Services (Willdan) to review and conduct an independent, detailed analysis of the City's cost allocation plan and user fee revenues. The city also directed Willdan to prepare a report recommending specific amounts of fees; and WHEREAS, Willdan prepared the study and report, listing the applicable direct and indirect costs for certain services provided by the city, describing the reasonable relationship between the fees 657
and the services provided by the city, and setting forth the time and method for payment of the fees, which is identified as the "User Fee Study," dated January 2024 (the "Report"), a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to reach full cost recovery without overburdening those using the City’s services and as such will cap initial user fee increases to no more than 50% of the existing fee amount, and phase in additional increases annually until fees reach their full cost recovery amount; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to adopt an inflationary factor to annually increase or decrease the adopted fees based on the Consumer Price Index for Riverside County; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code sections 66016 and 66018 the enactment or increase in any fees to be charged for services must be adopted by the City Council by ordinance or resolution, after providing notice and holding a public hearing.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code sections 66016 and 66019, the data required to be made available to the public prior to increasing the amount of the fees by this resolution was made available for public review at least 10 days prior to the date of this meeting.

WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the changes to the user fees was published in accordance with Government Code sections 66018 and 6062a.

WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing before the City Council was held on July 22, 2020, at which public testimony was received and duly considered on the proposed changes to the user fees.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code sections 66016 and 66019, fees adopted pursuant to those sections shall not take effect until at least sixty (60) days have passed since the final action on the adoption or increase of the fee.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS. The city council finds that:

A) The above recitals are true and correct, material to this resolution, and incorporated herein by reference as findings.

B) The Report has been considered and accepted, and is hereby incorporated into this resolution by reference.

C) The adoption of this resolution is not subject to CEQA review pursuant to CEQA guideline 15378(b)(4), which provides that the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project are not projects subject to CEQA review.
658
D) The user fees established by this resolution reflect the city's estimated reasonable costs of providing the services for which the fees are charged.

SECTION 2. UPDATE TO USER FEES. The city’s current master user fee schedules, as adopted by Resolution No. 13-26 and amended by Resolution No. 20-54, are repealed and replaced with the master user fee schedules set forth in “Exhibit A” to this resolution.

SECTION 3. COST RECOVERY. Certain fees in the city’s master user fee schedules adopted herein are set at an initial amount that does not recover 100% of the City’s costs as calculated in the Report. Those fees are denoted with an “X” in the Notes column of Exhibit “A.” The fees so marked in Exhibit “A” shall be increased annually, on July 1 of each year, commencing on July 1, 2024, until full cost recovery is achieved. The annual increase shall be 25% of the then-current fee amount, or the difference between the then-current fee amount and full cost recovery, whichever is lower. The annual fee adjustment provided for in Section 4 of this resolution shall be applied on top of any increases made pursuant to this Section 3. For the purposes of this section, “full cost recovery” shall mean the full cost recovery amount identified in the Report, plus a CPI adjustment made in accordance with Section 4 of this resolution.

SECTION 4. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT TO FEES. With the exception of those fees established by law, the fees in the city’s master user fee schedules attached hereto in “Exhibit A” shall be automatically adjusted annually on July 1 of each year based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index:

A) The city shall use the data table “Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for Riverside- San Bernardino-Ontario” for the prior twelve-month period ending March. If, for any reason, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics eliminates the Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario data table, a similar table that encompasses the Riverside County area the City of Eastvale is located in shall be utilized.

B) CPI Increases and decreases shall be limited to no more than 20% annually.

C) The first CPI adjustment shall occur on July 1, 2024.

SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any action, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution or the fees levied by this resolution shall be held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this resolution or the fees levied by this resolution that can be given effect without the invalid provisions.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE . This resolution shall become effective sixty (60) days after its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of January 2024. __________________________________________
659
Christian Dinco
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
660

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing City Council Resolution No. 24-XX, was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the 24th day of January 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
661

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Residential Permit Fees 1
2 Addressing - (individual lot} Fixed 195.00 2 3 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 116.00 3 4 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 195.00 4 5 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With No Tear Off (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 232.00 5 6 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 237.00 6 7 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 274.00 7 8 ReRoof - Comp Shingles With Tear Off (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 311.00 8 9 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 158.00 9 10 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 195.00 10 11 ReRoof - Built Up With No Tear Off (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 232.00 11 12 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 237.00 12 13 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 274.00 13 14 ReRoof - Built Up With Tear Off (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 311.00 14 15 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 237.00 15 16 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 274.00 16 17 ReRoof - Light Weight Tile/Metal (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 311.00 17 18 ReRoof - Tile (1 - 2000 sq ft) Fixed 345.00 18 19 ReRoof - Tile (2001 - 5000 sq ft) Fixed 437.00 19 20 ReRoof - Tile (5001 sq ft and greater) Fixed 528.00 20 21 Garden Wall-(block) - up to l00 linear feet or individual lot Fixed 244.00 21 22 Each additional 50 linear feet or fraction thereof Fixed 244.00 22 23 Swimming Pool (Fiberglass with no Heater) Fixed 905.00 23 24 Swimming Pool (Vinyl with no Heater) Fixed 905.00 24 25 Swimming Pool (Plaster with Heater) Fixed 1,252.00 25 26 Swimming Pool (Fiberglass with Heater) Fixed 1,034.00 26 27 Swimming Pool (Vinyl with Heater) Fixed 1,034.00 27 28 Window or Door, upgrade or addition (Replacement per Window or Door) Fixed 207.00 28 29 Window or Door (New) Fixed 640.00 29
30 30
Commercial/Industrial Permit Fees 31
32 Duplication of Certificate of Occupancy Fixed 168.00 32 33 Sign, each Building Only Fixed 298.00 33 34 34
Electrical 35
36 Special branch circuit Fixed 153.00 36 37 Electric Service New or Replacement (1-400 Amp) Fixed 153.00 37 Building Safety

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 1 OF 20 662

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Building Safety

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
38 Electric Service New or Replacement (401-1000 Amp) Fixed 608.00 38 39 Electric Service New or Replacement (1001 amps and Greater) Fixed 865.00 39 40 Electric Vehicle Charging Station, free standing Fixed 387.00 40 41 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Wall mounted Fixed 261.00 41 42 Residential Electrical Appliance 3HP or less Fixed 116.00 42 43 Residential Electrical Appliance Over 3HP Fixed 153.00 43 44 Commercial/Industrial Type Appliance (rating in horsepower or kilowatts, or kilovolt-amperes) Fixed - 44 45 Up to and including 1 Fixed 170.00 45
46 Over 1 not over 10 Fixed 244.00 46
47 Over 10 not over 50 Fixed 298.00 47
48 Over 50 not over 100 Fixed 340.00 48
49 Over 100 Fixed 415.00 49
50 Electric Vehicle Charging Station, free standing Fixed 170.00 50 51 Wall mounted Fixed 170.00 51
52 Temporary Lighting System (Christmas tree lots, pumpkin patches, etc.) Fixed 170.00 52 53 Temporary Power each, service pole or pedestal Fixed 116.00 53 54 Each additional pole in a single installation Fixed 79.00 54 55 Receptacles, Switches and Lights 1-20 Fixtures Per Fixture X Fixed 43.85 55 56 Receptacles, Switches and Lights 21 0r More Fixtures Per Fixture X Fixed 43.85 56 57 Generators up to 150 kw Fixed 900.00 57 58 Generators over 150 kw Fixed 1,267.00 58
59 59
Photovoltaic Systems Roof Mounted 60
61 Residential 15 kW and Under max Fixed 408.00 61 62 Residential Over 15kW plus $15 per kW over 15 kW Fixed 450.00 62 63 Commercial 50 kW and Under max Fixed 999.50 63 64 Commercial 51-250 kW plus $7 per kW over 51 kW Fixed 1,000.00 64 65 Commercial Over 250 kW plus $5 per kW over 250 kW X Fixed 1,000.00 65 66 66
Photovoltaic Systems Ground Mounted 67
68 Residential 15 kW and Under Fixed 450.00 68 69 Residential Over 15kW X Fixed 450.00 69 70 Commercial 50 kW and Under Fixed 717.00 70 71 Commercial 51-250 kW X Fixed 1,000.00 71
72 Commercial Over 250 kW X Fixed 1,000.00 72 73 73
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 2 OF 20 663

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Building Safety

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
Plumbing 74
75 Residential Natural Gas Piping, up to 4 Outlets Fixed 339.00 75 76 Residential Natural Gas Piping, 5 or More Outlets Per Fixture X Fixed 129.00 76 77 Commercial Natural Gas Piping, up to 4 Outlets Fixed 848.00 77 78 Commercial Natural Gas Piping, 5 or More Outlets Per Fixture X Fixed 289.00 78 79 Sewer Lateral per Building (new or replacement) Fixed 848.00 79 80 Water Heater Replacement Fixed 190.00 80 81 Plumbing Fixture or Trap, each Residential Fixed 116.00 81 82 Plumbing Fixture or Trap, each Commercial Fixed 479.00 82 83 Interceptor, Pretreatment, each Fixed 957.00 83 84 Process Piping System up to 5 outlets Fixed 848.00 84 85 Each additional outlet Fixed 224.00 85 86 Grease Trap Fixed 516.00 86
87 Solar Potable Water Heating System Fixed 774.00 87 88 Sewer Cap Fixed 190.00 88
89 Roof Drain/Rain Water Leaders Fixed 516.00 89 90 Water Heater New A Fixed 516.00 90
91 Water Main/Supply, 1 1/2" and Under A Fixed 516.00 91 92 Water Main/Supply, 1 3/4" to 3" A Fixed 774.00 92 93 Water Main/Supply 3" and Above A Fixed 1,141.00 93 94 Gray Water/Irrigation Systems Fixed 923.00 94 95 Septic Tank Abatement Fixed 190.00 95
96 96
Mechanical 97
98 HVAC Units - up to 150,000 CFM (Residential Replacement Same Location Except on Roof) Fixed 195.00 98 99 HVAC Units - up to 150,000 CFM (Commercial Replacement Same Location Except on Roof) Fixed 307.00 99 100 HVAC Units Residential New (Roof) - up to 150,000 CFM Fixed 274.00 100 101 HVAC Units Residential New (Ground) - up to 150,000 CFM Fixed 195.00 101 102 HVAC Units Commercial New (Roof) - up to 150,000 CFM Fixed 386.00 102 103 HVAC Units Commercial New (Ground) - up to 150,000 CFM Fixed 307.00 103 104 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Replacement (Commercial Replacement Same Location Except on Roof)
Fixed 170.00 104
105 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Commercial New (Roof) Fixed 386.00 105 106 HVAC Units - Over 150,000 CFM Commercial New (Ground) Fixed 278.00 106 107 Returns and Supplies Each (Duct Work) Fixed 129.00 107 City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 3 OF 20 664

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Building Safety

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
108 Cooling Tower Fixed 936.00 108
109 Decorative Gas Appliance Fixed 278.00 109 110 Exhaust Duct Type 2 Fixed 1,589.00 110
111 Exhaust Hood System, Type 1 Fixed 1,766.00 111 112 Ventilation System, each, not part of a heating or cooling system Fixed 965.00 112 113 Exhaust Fan Fixed 936.00 113
114 114
MISCELLANEOUS 115
116 Special Inspection Per Hour B Fixed 116.00 116 117 Temporary Event Per Hour C, X Fixed 1,034.00 117 118 Tower, Cell or Radio Fixed 1,359.00 118
119 Duplicate Job Card Fixed 190.00 119
120 Permit Issuance- (collected for each fixed fee permit issued) Per Half Hour B Fixed 84.00 120 121 Plan Check Fee -(per hour) Fixed/Hourly 217.00 121 122 Re-inspection Fee -(hour) Fixed/Hourly 148.00 122 123 General Plan Update Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees % 0.02 123 124 Technology Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees % 0.08 124 125 Plan Duplication/Reproduction per request Fixed - 125 126 126
Commercial Hourly Inspection Rates 127
128 Building Fixed/Hourly 148.00 128
129 Electrical Fixed/Hourly 148.00 129
130 Mechanical Fixed/Hourly 148.00 130
131 Plumbing Fixed/Hourly 148.00 131
132 Green Fee Fixed/Hourly 124.00 132
133 Seismic Fee Residential Fixed/Hourly 125.00 133 134 Seismic Fee Commercial Fixed/Hourly 126.00 134 NOTES
A Plan Check is for Commercial Only
B Half hour minimum
C 2 Hour minimum
X Fees will increase by 25% on July 1 each year until full cost recory is achieved City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 4 OF 20 665

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
PASSPORTS 1
Adult Applicants (16 and over) 2
3 First-time Adult Passport Book regulated 130.00 3 4 First-time Adult Passport Card regulated 30.00 4 5 First-time Adult Passport Book & Card regulated 160.00 5 6 Executive Fee (Acceptance Fee regulated 35.00 6 7 7
All Minor Applicants (16 and under) 8
9 Minor Passport Book regulated 100.00 9
10 Minor Passport Card regulated 15.00 10 11 Minor Passport Book & Card regulated 115.00 11 12 Executive Fee (Acceptance Fee regulated 35.00 12 13 13
Optional fees 14
15 Expedite Fee A regulated 60.00 15
16 1-2 day delivery B regulated 17.56 16 17 File Search Fee C regulated 150.00 17
18 18
Adult Renewals (16 and over) 19
20 Adult Passport Book regulated 130.00 20 21 Adult Passport Card regulated 30.00 21 22 Adult Passport Book & Card regulated 160.00 22 23 Passport Application Fee regulated 35.00 23 24 Passport Photo Fee flat 7.00 24
25 25
MISCELLANEOUS 26
27 Publicaton Fee: Public Hearing Each Actual Costs 27
28 Notary Fee Per Signature regulated 15.00 28 29 Candidate Filing Fee Each regulated 25.00 29 30 Reproduction: Copies (B&W) Per Page 0.10 30 31 Reproduction: Copies (Color) Per Page 0.25 31 32 Reproduction: CD Each 10.00 32
33 Reproduction: DVD Each 15.00 33
NOTES
A
City Clerk

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
Paid per application, in addition to required fees. Provides faster processing than routine service.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 5 OF 20 666

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
City Clerk

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
B
C A file search is necessary when an applicant is unable to present evidence of U.S. citizenship or verification of a previously issued U.S. Passport or Consular Report of Birth Abroad. Applicant must submit Form DS-11 and a written request for a file search.

Paid per application for 1-2 day delivery of an issued passport book from the Department of State to the customer. Only applies to mailing addresses within the United States. Not valid for passport cards.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 6 OF 20 667

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 1
2 Vacant Property Registration Fixed 83.00$ 2 3 Removal of Signs X Fixed 10.00$ 3
4 Registration of Residential Property in Foreclosure Program Fixed 544.00$ 4 5 Reinspection Fee Fixed 58.00$ 5
6 Written Demands for Lien Release A Fixed 154.00$ 6 Sidewalk Vending 7
8 Sidewalk Vending Permit Fixed 177.00$ 8
9 Sidewalk Vending Permit Renewal Fixed 57.00$ 9 10 Late Fee Fixed 40.00$ 10
11 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; first violation B Fixed 250.00$ 11 12 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; second violation B Fixed 500.00$ 12 13 Administrative Fine: Vending without Permit; third violation and subsequent violations B Fixed 1,000.00$ 13 14 Fine Reduction: Upon proof of valid permit before fines are due: B Fixed 100; 200; 500 re 14 15 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) first violation C Fixed 100.00$ 15 16 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) second violation C Fixed 200.00$ 16 17 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) third violation C Fixed 500.00$ 17 18 Administrative Fine: Violations of 6.76.140(b) fourth violation and subsequent violations and revocation of permit
C Fixed 500.00$ 18
19 Fine Reduction: maybe reduced by 20% of original fine D Fixed 0.20$ 19 Cannabis Violation 20
21 Administrative Fine: Violation of Cannibis per cannabis plant E Fixed 1,000.00$ 21 NOTES
A County Recorded fee + staff time
B per municipal code 6.76.140(a)
C per municipal code 6.76.140(b)
D per municipal code 6.76.140(d)
E per municipal code 120.04.150€
Community Enhancement and Safety

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 7 OF 20 668

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
PLAN CHECK 1
2 Traffic Study/ Traffic Impact analysis - Review hourly Deposit Actual Cost 2 3 Traffic Signals, Signing/Striping, TCP hourly Deposit Actual Cost 3 4 Subdivision Map - Review hourly Deposit Actual Cost 4 5 Tentative Map Review Deposit Deposit Actual Cost 5
6 Final Map Review Deposit Deposit Actual Cost 6
7 Dedication/Lot Merger Review Deposit Deposit Actual Cost 7 8 8
LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECK 9
10 Plan Check Costs Minimum Deposit Deposit 1,000.00 10 11 Legal Review Deposit Deposit Hourly Rate 11
12 Special Technical Study Review Deposit Deposit Actual Cost 12 13 13
PERMITS 14
TRANSPORTATION PERMITS 15
16 Oversize Permit - Annual state 90.00 16 17 Oversize Permit - Single Trip state 16.00 17 18 18
ENCROACHMENT PERMITS 19
20 Encroachment Permit - Regular each 162.00 20 21 Encroachment Permit - Arterial each 318.00 21 22 Encroachment Permit - Extension each 31.00 22 23 23
GRADING PERMITS 24
25 Rough Grading Permit each 140.00 25
26 Precise Grading Permit each 140.00 26
27 27
HAUL ROUTE PERMITS 28
29 51-999 CY each 342.00 29
30 1,000-5,000 CY each 576.00 30
31 5,001-25,000 CY each 810.00 31
32 plus $300 for each additional 5,000 CY over 25,000 CY each 1,044.00 32 33 33
HOMEOWNER ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 34
35 Curb Outlet each 114.00 35
36 Second Driveway each 159.00 36
37 Minor Work each 31.00 37
38 Temporary Storage Bin/Dumpster Permit each 31.00 38 Engineering

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 8 OF 20 669

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Engineering

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
39 39
INSPECTIONS 40
41 Trench Excavation/Back fill/Paving Restoration, up to 100 LF min 409.00 41 42 Plus per LF over 100 LF per LF 4.10 42 43 Storm Drains/Culverts/Open Channels, up to 100 LF min 585.00 43 44 Plus per LF over 100 LF per LF 5.85 44 45 Curb, Gutter or combo w/ Earthwork, up to 100 LF min 292.00 45 46 Plus per LF over 100 LF per LF 2.92 46 47 Traffic Occupancy or Lane Closure requiring signage - Residential per day 234.00 47 49 Traffic Occupancy or Lane Closure requiring signage - Arterial/Collector per day 468.00 49 50 Sidewalk Closure 117.00 50
51 Curb Ramp including Earthwork each 468.00 51 52 Sidewalk w/ Earthwork, up to 100 SF min 292.00 52 53 Plus per SF over 100 SF per SF 2.92 53 54 Driveway Approach w/ Earthwork, up to 100 SF min 292.00 54 55 Plus per SF over 100 SF per SF 2.92 55 56 Excavation for Small Utility Repair, up to 50 SF each 146.00 56 57 Potholing per hole 29.00 57
58 Additional Inspection Time Required per hour A Deposit Actual Cost 58 59 Overtime (Satruday and Nighwork on weekday) per hour A Deposit 175.00 59 60 Overtime (Sunday) per hour A Deposit 234.00 60 61 61
ROUGH GRADING INSPECTION 62
63 Up to 500 cubic yards (total cut and fill) min 468.00 63 64 Plus per 300 cu.yd. over 500 cu.yd. less than 5,000 cu.yd. per 300 cu.yd. 234.00 64 65 Plus per 1,000 cu.yd. over 1,000 cu.yd. per 1,000 cu.yd. 46.00 65 66 66
LAND DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT INSPECTIONS 67
68 Public Works Inspection Minimum Deposit Deposit 10,000.00 68 69 69
NPDES CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 70
71 Less than 10 acres 468.00 71
72 10-25 acres 702.00 72
73 Greater than 25 acres 1,872.00 73
74 74
NPDES BUSINESS INSPECTION 75
76 Late Fee Penalty 60.00 76
77 77
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 9 OF 20 670

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Engineering

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
OTHERS/MISCELLANEOUS 78
79 Certificate of Correction each 371.00 79 80 Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions; Subdivision Improvement Agreements each 641.00 80 81 General Plan Update Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees 0.02 81 82 Technology Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees 0.08 82 83 83
STORM WATER NPDES INSPECTIONS (when necessary, as required by Stormwater Permit) 84 85 Commercial per inspection 175.00 85
86 Industrial per inspection 292.00 86
87 Follow-up per inspection 117.00 87
NOTES
A Four hour minimum
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 10 OF 20 671

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
MISCELLANEOUS 1
Business Registration 2
3 Business Registration Admin Fee: New each 98.00 3 4 Business Registration Admin Fee: Renewal each 60.00 4 5 Business Registration Late Fee each penalty 60.00 5 6 CASP Fee each A regulated 4.00 6
7 Accounts Receivable 8
9 Late Charge Penalty on Delinquent Accounts Receivable B penalty 0.01 9 10 to NSF Check/Credit Card Stopped Payment each 1st $25, add'l $3 10 11 Administrative Fees 12
13 Outgoing Wire/ACH Fee each C 52.00 13 14 Developer Deposit Processing Fee each 48.00 14 15 MSHCP Administrative Fee each regulated 56.00 15 NOTES
A Passthrough
B Per month on all obligations older than 30 days
C Plus bank fee
Finance

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 11 OF 20 672

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Fire
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Fire/Life Safety and Operational Permit Fees - 1 2 Aerosol Products annual Fixed 70.00 2 3 Amusement Buildings annual X Fixed 75.00 3 4 Apartment Buildings, 1-14 units annual A Fixed 70.00 4 5 Apartment Buildings, 15-50 units annual A Fixed 106.00 5 6 Apartment Buildings, each add'l 50 units annual A, X Fixed 46.00 6 7 Energy Storage Systems annual Fixed 106.00 7 8 Candles and Open Flames per occur Fixed 75.00 8 9 Carnivals & Fairs per event Fixed 222.00 9 10 Cellulous Nitrate annual Fixed 70.00 10 11 Christmas Tree Lot/Pumpkin Patch per occur Fixed 151.00 11 12 Combustible Fiber Storage/Handling annual Fixed 70.00 12 13 Compressed Gases Storage/Handling annual Fixed 70.00 13 14 Cryogenic Fluids annual Fixed 70.00 14 15 Dry Cleaning Plants annual Fixed 70.00 15 16 Combustible Dust Producing Operations annual Fixed 70.00 16 17 Explosives and/or Blasting Agents per occur Fixed 222.00 17 18 Fireworks Display per event Fixed 361.00 18 19 Flammable Combustible Liquids Storage/Handling annual Fixed 70.00 19 20 Floor Finishing/Surfacing Operations annual Fixed 75.00 20 21 Fruit & Crop Ripening Facilities annual Fixed 75.00 21 22 Green Waste annual Fixed 151.00 22
23 Hazardous Materials Storage or Production annual Fixed 303.00 23 24 High Piled Combustible Storage 0 to 10k sq ft annual Fixed 151.00 24 25 High Piled Combustible Storage 10k to 50k sq ft annual Fixed 227.00 25 26 High Piled Combustible Storage 50lk to 100k sq ft annual Fixed 263.00 26 27 High Piled Combustible Storage 100k+ sq ft annual Fixed 263.00 27 28 High Rise Building annual A Fixed 283.00 28 29 Hospitals annual A Fixed 283.00 29
30 Hot Work/Cutting & Welding per occur Fixed 75.00 30 31 Jails annual A Fixed 141.00 31
32 Liquefied Petroleum Gases annual Fixed 70.00 32 33 Lumber Yards annual Fixed 141.00 33
34 Magnesium annual Fixed 70.00 34
35 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage annual Fixed 70.00 35 36 Mobile Home Park, 1-14 units annual Fixed 35.00 36 37 Mobile Home Park, 15-50 units annual Fixed 70.00 37 38 Mobile Home Park, each add'l 50 units annual X Fixed 31.00 38

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 12 OF 20 673

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Fire
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
39 Motor Vehicle/Marine Fuel Dispensing Stations annual Fixed 70.00 39 40 Organic Coatings annual Fixed 70.00 40 41 Industrial Ovens annual Fixed 70.00 41 42 Places of Assembly annual Fixed 141.00 42 43 Private Schools annual Fixed 141.00 43 44 Refrigeration Equipment annual Fixed 70.00 44 45 Repair Garage and/or Service Garage annual Fixed 106.00 45 46 Residential Care facil: Pre Inspection annual Fixed 75.00 46 47 Residential Care facil: 7+ People annual Fixed 70.00 47 48 Special Events: 1-500 Participants per event Fixed 75.00 48 49 Special Events: 501-1,000 Participants per event Fixed 151.00 49 50 Special Events: 1,000+ Participants per event Fixed 106.00 50 51 Spraying or Dipping Finishes annual Fixed 70.00 51 52 Temporary Structure: Tent> 200 sq ft. per occur Fixed 70.00 52 53 Tires: Storage including Scrap & Byproducts annual Fixed 70.00 53 54 Waste Materials Handling (Salvage Yard) annual Fixed 70.00 54 55 Wood Products Storage annual Fixed 70.00 55 56 Aviation facilities annual Fixed 70.00 56 57 Cutting and welding annual Fixed 70.00 57 58 Exhibits and trade shows per event Fixed 141.00 58 59 Fire hydrants and valves per occur Fixed 70.00 59 60 Mobile fueling of hydrogen vehicles annual Fixed 53.00 60 61 Fumigation and insecticidal fogging per occur Fixed 53.00 61 62 HPM (Hazardous production materials) facilities annual Fixed 70.00 62 63 Liquid- or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings annual Fixed 70.00 63 64 Mobile food preparation vehicles per occur Fixed 70.00 64 65 Open burning annual Fixed 70.00 65
66 Open flames and torches annual Fixed 53.00 66 67 Open flames and candles annual Fixed 53.00 67 68 Outdoor assembly event per event Fixed 141.00 68 69 Plant extraction systems annual Fixed 141.00 69 70 Private fire hydrants per occur Fixed 70.00 70 71 Pyrotechnic special effects material annual Fixed 141.00 71 72 Pyroxylin plastic annual Fixed 70.00 72 73 Rooftop heliports annual Fixed 70.00 73 74 Tire-rebuilding plants annual Fixed 141.00 74 75 Energy storage systems annual Fixed 70.00 75 76 76
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 13 OF 20 674

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Fire
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
Fire New Construction Permit Fees 77
New Building 78
79 1- 10,000 sq ft Fixed 187.00 79
80 10,001- 25,000 sq ft Fixed 263.00 80
81 25,001- 100,000 sq ft Fixed 338.00 81
82 100,001+ sq ft per 100,000 sq ft Fixed 303.00 82 83 83
Tenant Improvement 84
85 1- 5,000 sq ft Fixed 111.00 85
86 5,001- 15,000 sq ft Fixed 187.00 86
87 15,001- 30,000 sq ft Fixed 263.00 87
88 30,001- 100,000 sq ft Fixed 338.00 88
89 100,001+ sq ft per 100,000 sq ft Fixed 303.00 89 90 Fire Alarm: Water Flow monitoring Fixed 111.00 90 91 Fire Alarm: Alarm including Voice Evac. per riser or 100 heads Fixed 222.00 91 92 92
Fire Sprinkler- Commercial 93
94 New Construction-per riser per riser or 100 heads Fixed 187.00 94 95 Tenant Improvement per riser or 100 heads Fixed 151.00 95 96 96
Fire Sprinkler- Residential 97
98 Multi-Family 13R-per riser Fixed 187.00 98 99 Single Family 13D Fixed 151.00 99
100 Underground Water/Fire Main Fixed 298.00 100 101 Standpipe System-per riser Fixed 187.00 101 102 Fire Pump-per system Fixed 222.00 102 103 103
Underground Tank 104
105 Underground Tank Removal per occur Fixed 111.00 105 106 106
Fire Suppression 107
108 Hood and Duct/Clean Agent- 1st System Fixed 187.00 108 109 Each Additional X Fixed 64.00 109
110 High Pile Storage Fixed 303.00 110
111 Fueling Station (incl. CNG/LPG and Tanks)- per system Fixed 151.00 111 112 Smoke Control Station Fixed 303.00 112 113 Spray Booth Fixed 227.00 113
114 114
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 14 OF 20 675

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Fire
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
Hazardous Materials Plan and Storage 115
116 1-999 sq ft X Fixed 127.00 116
117 1,000-2,500 sq ft Fixed 227.00 117
118 2,501+ sq ft Fixed 303.00 118
119 Technical Reports and Research per hour Hourly 151.00 119 120 All Other Plan Reviews and/or Inspections not listed per hour Hourly 151.00 120 NOTES
A State mandated
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 15 OF 20 676

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Planning
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
PLANNING APPLICATIONS 1
2 Pre Application Review Fixed 6,103.00 2
3 Appeals to Planning Commission/ City Council - General X Fixed 1,446.00 3 4 Extension of Time Fixed 2,492.00 4
5 Change of Zone Fixed 17,815.00 5
6 Conditional User Permit Fixed 9,515.00 6
7 Conditional User Permit - Alcohol Fixed 4,233.00 7 8 Development Agreement A Deposit 30,000.00 8
9 General Plan Amendment Deposit 10,895.00 9
10 Minor Development Review Fixed 6,628.00 10 11 Major Development Review (<5 acres or less) Fixed 11,102.00 11 12 Major Development Review (>5 or more) X Fixed 14,332.00 12 13 Adjustment X Fixed 361.00 13
14 Specific Plan Deposit 28,906.00 14
15 Specific Plan Amendment Deposit 19,860.00 15 16 Temporary Event Permit (Minor) Fixed 738.00 16 17 Temporary Event Permit (Major) X Fixed 1,200.00 17 18 Temporary Use Permit X Fixed 999.00 18 19 Sign Program Fixed 1,587.00 19
20 Variance Fixed 4,897.00 20
21 Zoning Confirmation Letter X Fixed 300.00 21 22 Residential Beekeeping Fixed 599.00 22 23 Accessory Dwelling Unit Fixed 649.00 23 24 Landscape Plan review Fixed 3,984.00 24
25 SB 9 - Lot Split Fixed 649.00 25
26 SB 330 - Housing Streamlining Fixed 649.00 26 27 Development Code Amendment Deposit 3,740.00 27 28 Determination of Use Fixed 2,720.00 28
29 29
Subdivision Applications - 30
31 Certificate of Land Division Compliance - with Waiver of Final Parcel Map X Fixed 759.00 31 32 Lot Line Adjustment X Fixed 1,167.00 32
33 Reversion to Acreage Fixed 5,380.00 33
34 Tentative Parcel Map Fixed 14,734.00 34
35 Vesting Tentative Parcel Map Fixed 7,956.00 35 36 Tentative Tract Map Plus $60 per lot fee Fixed 21,114.00 36 37 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Fixed 7,956.00 37 38 38

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 16 OF 20 677

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Planning
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - 39
40 CA Fish & Game Fee - Negative Declaration/EIR see Planning 40 41 Environmental Impact Report Deposit contract+18% 41
42 Initial Study/Mitigated Neg Dec Deposit 24,931.00 42 43 43
MISCELLANEOUS - 44
45 General Plan Update Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees 0.02 45 46 Technology Fee % of Building, Planning, Engineering Fees 0.08 46 47 Plan Duplication/Reproduction per request Actual Cost 47 NOTES
A Municipal Code Section 120.090.040
X Fees will increase by 25% on July 1 each year until full cost recory is achieved City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 17 OF 20 678

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Community Safety
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
Residential Self-Hauling 1
2 Residential Self-Hauling Permit Application 341.00 2 3 Re-inspection fee 68.00 3
Commercial Self-Hauling - 4
5 Commercial Self-Hauling Permit Application 477.00 5 6 Re-inspection fee 197.00 6
NOTES

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 18 OF 20 679

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Police
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
MISCELLANEOUS 1
2 Towed Vehicle Release Fee fixed 170.00 2 3 Report Fee fixed 13.00 3
NOTES

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 19 OF 20 680

MASTER USER FEE SCHEDULE
Community Services
# Fee Name Unit Note Fee Type Fee #
FOOD VENDOR 1
2 Food Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 230.00 2 3 Food Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 90.00 3 4 Non-Profit Food Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 135.00 4 5 Non-profit Food Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 67.50 5 6 6

RETAIL/CRAFT VENDOR
7 Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 160.00 7 8 Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 60.00 8 9 Non-Profit Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 97.50 9 10 Non-Profit Retail-Craft Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 45.00 10 11 11

INFORMATION VENDOR BOOTH
12 Information Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 130.00 12 13 Information Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 40.00 13 14 Non-Profit Information Vendor Booth Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 55.00 14 15 Non-Profit Information Vendor Booth Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 20.00 15 16 16

FOOD TRUCK VENDOR
17 Food Truck Vendor Fee - Large Event (>5K + daily) Daily A fixed 130.00 17 18 Food Truck Vendor Fee - Small Event (<5K + daily) Daily A fixed 60.00 18 19 19

ADMISSION/PARKING
20 Non-Eastvale Resident Event Amenity Admission Fee Daily B fixed 5.00 20 21 Non-Eastvale Resident Event Parking Fee Daily C fixed 10.00 21 NOTES
A Fee per single standard booth space
B Fee use varies per event/amenity
C Fee use varies per event/parking lot

CITY OF EASTVALE
2024 Adopted User Fee Study
City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ eastvaleca.gov 20 OF 20 681

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.1
January 24, 2024
Eastvale Essentials - City Merchandise Shop
Prepared By:

Mollie Kortsen, Communications Officer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Discuss and provide direction on the Eastvale Essentials merchandise logo. 2 .

Approve a surcharge of 12% per item for administrative cost recovery.

Summary
Eastvale Essen#als, our brand-new city merchandise line is a carefully curated collec#on of must- have items that capture the unique charm and character of our beloved city. From stylish apparel and accessories to one-of-a-kind souvenirs, each product tells a story of Eastvale's rich history, diverse culture, and thriving community.

These items allow residents to embrace the essence of our community everywhere they go. Staﬀ is proposing a variety of unique logo op#ons for City Council considera#on. These op#ons are inten#onally diﬀerent from the City's current logo and seal so that this proposed merchandise worn by the public won't be confused for city personnel.

Background
The City of Eastvale has always been commi-ed to fostering a strong sense of community and pride among its residents. As part of our ongoing eﬀorts to enhance community engagement and promote civic pride, we are proposing the establishment of a resident merchandise line called "Eastvale Essentials." 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
682

The proposed "Eastvale Essen#als" merchandise line will include a variety of items designed to meet the diverse preferences of our residents. This may include but is not limited to:

- Apparel: T-shirts, hoodies, and hats featuring unique designs that capture the spirit of our city - Home and Lifestyle Products: Mugs, water bo-les, and other lifestyle items adorned with Eastvale branding to enhance daily living
- Accessories: Keychains, tote bags, and decals that residents can use to accessorize and personalize their belongings
- Seasonal items: Special releases #ed to local events, holidays, or milestones to keep the merchandise line fresh and exciting
We recommend the City Council review and approve the proposal for the establishment of "Eastvale Essen#als." Following approval, staﬀ will proceed with vendor selec#on, design collabora#on, and the development of a detailed marketing plan.

The introduc#on of "Eastvale Essen#als" is an exci#ng opportunity to enhance community spirit and generate posi#ve economic impact. We believe this ini#a#ve aligns with the values and goals of the City of Eastvale.

Addi#onally, staﬀ recommends that the City Council consider adop#ng a 12% administra#ve surcharge fee for all products. The surcharge fee covers the city's direct alloca#on internal service costs of purchasing and acquiring merchandise, tracking inventory, accoun#ng, and reconcilia#on of quarterly and annual sales tax returns. The 12 percent surcharge fee is the sum of the overhead costs associated with the Communica#ons Division (5%) and Finance Department (7%) as iden#ﬁed during the city's most recent cost allocation plan and user fee study.

Environmental
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
The merchandise line serves as a tangible expression of our city's character, fostering a sense of unity and pride among residents. The merchandise line aims to establish a visual iden#ty that resonates with the community.

Fiscal Impact
Once approved, items to be sold will be through a third party website and the fees for each item will be determined at an administrative level.

Staﬀ is recommending an addi#onal 12% surcharge fee on top of the cost of the item to cover administra#ve fees incurred by the City. The surcharge will be recorded in the General Fund and help to offset administrative costs arising from the merchandise program.

Eastvale City CouncilJanuary 24, 2024

Eastvale City Council
January 24, 2024