Agenda packet — Eastvale City Council, June 11, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Annual Operating & Capital Improvement Budget
Summary of Transfers
Audited Amended Amended Proposed
Actuals Budget Budget Budget
Fund Name & Type 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Cost Allocation Plan - 355 182 129 472 LMD 2001-3 ZONE YY
Cost Allocation Plan - 2,621 1, 129 503 473 LMD 2001-3 ZONE ZZ
Cost Allocation Plan - 307 197 148 474 LMD 2001-3 ZONE AAA
Cost Allocation Plan - 1,284 814 593 475 LMD 2001-3 ZONE BBB
Cost Allocation Plan - 924 573 429 476 LMD 2001-3 ZONE CCC
Cost Allocation Plan - 2,713 1, 530 984 477 LMD 2001-3 ZONE DDD
Cost Allocation Plan - 1,596 1, 013 744 478 LMD 2001-3 ZONE EEE
Cost Allocation Plan - 89 63 238 479 LMD 2001-3 ZONE FFF
Cost Allocation Plan - 1,381 936 682 480 LMD 2001-3 ZONE GGG
Cost Allocation Plan - 703 426 353 481 LMD 2001-3 ZONE HHH
Cost Allocation Plan - 429 305 195 482 LMD 2001-3 ZONE III
Cost Allocation Plan - 1,754 3, 859 1, 474 483 LMD 2001-3 ZONE JJJ
Cost Allocation Plan - 898 558 406 484 LMD 2001-3 ZONE LLL
Cost Allocation Plan - 518 264 163 485 LMD 2001-3 ZONE MMM
Cost Allocation Plan - 617 384 290 486 ID 2 SUBAREA 35
Cost Allocation Plan - 860 455 358 487 ID 2 SUBAREA 42
Cost Allocation Plan - 343 168 119 488 ID 2 SUBAREA 46
Cost Allocation Plan - 759 1, 028 325 489 ID 2 SUBAREA 49
Cost Allocation Plan - 969 633 418 490 ID 2 SUBAREA 55
Cost Allocation Plan - 193 103 81 601 Information Technology Capital Fund
Transfer fund balance from ITS Internal Service Fund 388,652 - - - TOTAL Transfers Out 9,286,747 11,539,088 12, 741,905 31, 580,803 Net Transfers - - - - City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ www.eastvaleca.gov 28 248
DRAFT

GENERAL FUNDS
General Fund 293,075 531,786 510,406 507,811 TOTAL General Funds 293,075 531,786 510,406 507,811

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
200 Gas Tax (160,280) (163, 080) (141, 914) (165, 487) 210 Measure A (120,000) (166, 040) (273, 410) (274, 671) 220 Air Quality Management District - - - - Community Facility Districts - - - - 315 Community Facilities District 2019-1 - (843) (397) (337) 316 Community Facilities District 2025-1 - - - (1, 423) 317 Community Facilities District 2024-2 - - - (1, 665) 400 Community Facilities District 2017-1 - (7, 359) (649) (2, 000) 401 Community Facilities District 2017-2 - (7, 058) (3, 288) (2, 410) 402 Community Facilities District 2020-1 - (31, 506) (15, 414) (10, 861) Landscape Maintenance Districts
300 LLMD 89-1 Zone 10 (35) - - - 301 LLMD 89-1 Zone 33 (20) - - - 302 LLMD 89-1 Zone 41 (980) (7, 960) (1, 457) (1, 533) 303 LLMD 89-1 Zone 79 (5) (314) (140) (113) 304 LLMD 89-1 Zone 85 (5) (55) (11) (11) 305 LLMD 89-1 Zone 111 (960) (4, 198) (1, 258) (1, 111) 306 LLMD 89-1 Zone 115 (320) (3, 071) (1, 392) (1, 069) 307 LLMD 89-1 Zone 116 (250) (1, 671) (699) (541) 308 LLMD 89-1 Zone 147 (240) (1, 359) (613) (450) 309 LLMD 89-1 Zone 151 (500) (6, 816) (2, 326) (2, 948) 310 LLMD 89-1 Zone 156 (370) (3, 746) (1, 616) (1, 222) 311 Benefit Assessment District 2014-2 (140) (1, 991) - (558) 312 LLMD 2014-1 (370) (3, 472) - (705) 313 LLMD 2014-3 (125) (1, 753) - (431) 314 LLMD 2014-4 (125) (834) - (122) 403 LMD 98-2 ORIGINAL - (1, 578) (684) (341) 404 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 01/ZONE A - (1, 178) (514) (241) 405 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 02/ZONE B - (6, 203) (4, 992) (3, 545) 406 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 03/ZONE C - (2, 335) (1, 041) (497) 407 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 04/ZONE D - (3, 007) (1, 362) (670) 408 LMD 98-2 ANNEX 06/ZONE F - (2, 530) (1, 131) (561) 409 LMD 2001-1 ZONE G - (108) (60) (47) 410 LMD 2001-1 ZONE S - (249) (125) (100) 411 LMD 2001-1 ZONE W - - - - 412 LMD 2001-2 ZONE A - (2, 500) (1, 401) (1, 128) 413 LMD 2001-2 ZONE B - (2, 553) (1, 126) (578) 414 LMD 2001-2 ZONE C - (170) (86) (54) 415 LMD 2001-2 ZONE D - (1, 713) (768) (378) 416 LMD 2001-2 ZONE F - (508) (224) (127) 417 LMD 2001-2 ZONE G - (2, 463) (612) (560) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ www.eastvaleca.gov 29 249
DRAFT

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Annual Operating & Capital Improvement Budget
Cost Allocation Plan
Audited Audited Amended Proposed
Actuals Actuals Budget Budget
Fund Name & Type 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
418 LMD 2001-2 ZONE H - (4, 416) (1, 857) (893) 419 LMD 2001-2 ZONE J - (2, 937) (1, 299) (664) 420 LMD 2001-2 ZONE K - (713) (352) (270) 421 LMD 2001-2 ZONE M - (421) (170) (79) 422 LMD 2001-3 ZONE A - (1, 155) (618) (421) 423 LMD 2001-3 ZONE B - (865) (413) (207) 424 LMD 2001-3 ZONE C - (574) (365) (265) 425 LMD 2001-3 ZONE D - (1, 294) (807) (609) 426 LMD 2001-3 ZONE E - (2, 861) (1, 784) (1, 326) 427 LMD 2001-3 ZONE F - (218) (210) (122) 428 LMD 2001-3 ZONE G - (843) (551) (390) 429 LMD 2001-3 ZONE H - (721) (412) (303) 430 LMD 2001-3 ZONE I - (5, 545) (2, 393) (1, 095) 431 LMD 2001-3 ZONE J - (1, 568) (685) (314) 432 LMD 2001-3 ZONE K - (2, 403) (1, 032) (484) 433 LMD 2001-3 ZONE L - (1, 831) (781) (339) 434 LMD 2001-3 ZONE M - (2, 231) (1, 216) (792) 435 LMD 2001-3 ZONE N - (7, 268) (3, 698) (1, 342) 436 LMD 2001-3 ZONE O - (194) (121) (91) 437 LMD 2001-3 ZONE P - (1, 015) (653) (489) 438 LMD 2001-3 ZONE Q - (530) (354) (253) 439 LMD 2001-3 ZONE R - (274) (102) (55) 440 LMD 2001-3 ZONE S - (220) (138) (102) 441 LMD 2001-3 ZONE T - (1, 450) (938) (693) 442 LMD 2001-3 ZONE U - (1, 117) (1, 595) (533) 443 LMD 2001-3 ZONE V - (1, 759) (1, 223) (854) 444 LMD 2001-3 ZONE W - (698) (405) (289) 445 LMD 2001-3 ZONE X - (176) (107) (80) 446 LMD 2001-3 ZONE Y - (273) (170) (126) 447 LMD 2001-3 ZONE Z - (294) (185) (137) 448 LMD 2001-3 ZONE AA - (226) (131) (90) 449 LMD 2001-3 ZONE BB - (169) (104) (77) 450 LMD 2001-3 ZONE CC - (2, 299) (1, 305) (417) 451 LMD 2001-3 ZONE DD - (2, 120) (1, 101) (631) 452 LMD 2001-3 ZONE EE - (829) (514) (486) 453 LMD 2001-3 ZONE FF - (2, 251) (1, 296) (531) 454 LMD 2001-3 ZONE GG - (431) (275) (204) 455 LMD 2001-3 ZONE HH - (367) (223) (172) 456 LMD 2001-3 ZONE II - (730) (465) (343) 457 LMD 2001-3 ZONE JJ - (154) (95) (70) 458 LMD 2001-3 ZONE KK - (787) (412) (322) 459 LMD 2001-3 ZONE LL - (322) (799) (139) 460 LMD 2001-3 ZONE MM - (629) (288) (155) 461 LMD 2001-3 ZONE NN - (533) (334) (247) 462 LMD 2001-3 ZONE OO - (593) (353) (321) City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ www.eastvaleca.gov 30 250
DRAFT

CITY OF EASTVALE
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Annual Operating & Capital Improvement Budget
Cost Allocation Plan
Audited Audited Amended Proposed
Actuals Actuals Budget Budget
Fund Name & Type 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
463 LMD 2001-3 ZONE PP - (700) (490) (335) 464 LMD 2001-3 ZONE QQ - (294) (170) (129) 465 LMD 2001-3 ZONE RR - (1, 543) (989) (740) 466 LMD 2001-3 ZONE SS - (627) (379) (282) 467 LMD 2001-3 ZONE TT - (322) (196) (146) 468 LMD 2001-3 ZONE UU - (193) (118) (88) 469 LMD 2001-3 ZONE VV - (236) (139) (105) 470 LMD 2001-3 ZONE WW - (693) (447) (330) 471 LMD 2001-3 ZONE XX - (355) (182) (129) 472 LMD 2001-3 ZONE YY - (2, 621) (1, 129) (503) 473 LMD 2001-3 ZONE ZZ - (307) (197) (148) 474 LMD 2001-3 ZONE AAA - (1, 284) (814) (593) 475 LMD 2001-3 ZONE BBB - (924) (573) (429) 476 LMD 2001-3 ZONE CCC - (2, 713) (1, 530) (984) 477 LMD 2001-3 ZONE DDD - (1, 596) (1, 013) (744) 478 LMD 2001-3 ZONE EEE - (89) (63) (238) 479 LMD 2001-3 ZONE FFF - (1, 381) (936) (682) 480 LMD 2001-3 ZONE GGG - (703) (426) (353) 481 LMD 2001-3 ZONE HHH - (429) (305) (195) 482 LMD 2001-3 ZONE III - (1, 754) (3, 859) (1, 474) 483 LMD 2001-3 ZONE JJJ - (898) (558) (406) 484 LMD 2001-3 ZONE LLL - (518) (264) (163) 485 LMD 2001-3 ZONE MMM - (617) (384) (290) Illumination Districts
486 ID 2 SUBAREA 35 - (860) (455) (358) 487 ID 2 SUBAREA 42 - (343) (168) (119) 488 ID 2 SUBAREA 46 - (759) (1, 028) (325) 489 ID 2 SUBAREA 49 - (969) (633) (418) 490 ID 2 SUBAREA 55 - (193) (103) (81) Development Impact Fees
290 DIF Transportation Facilities Fund (3,040) (5, 170) (377) (391) 291 DIF Fire Facilities Fund (1,290) (910) (160) (69) 292 DIF Public Facilities Fund (4,020) (3, 260) (1, 282) (247) TOTAL Special Revenue Funds (293,075) (531,786) (510, 406) (507, 811) TOTAL Cost Allocation -$ -$ -$ -$ City of Eastvale Cost Allocation Plan
A Cost Allocation Plan allows an organization to fairly and completely allocate its administrative costs. This plan allows the General fund to recover costs from non-General Funds and will also determine the overhead costs on the hourly rates of staff providing fee services. Local governments have overhead and administrative costs essential to operating the government and providing services to the public. Examples include costs incurred for a city council, a board of commissioners, a city manager, human resources, financial management, government facilities, insurance, purchasing, records management, and information technology. These costs are funded by Eastvale’s general fund and the City has many other types of funds that provide a variety of services that use these administrative and overhead resources. These indirect services are provided to the City's operating departments such as police, fire, development services, public works, and other non-general funds

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ www.eastvaleca.gov 31 251
DRAFT

which recognize the need for these services and permit the allocation.

The total cost plan which Eastvale uses is able to allocate all indirect costs like the private sector routinely does. This type of plan is preferred whenever the goal is to fully allocate indirect costs for inter-fund transfers and fee calculations. Specifically, the City of Eastvale’s cost allocation plan model develops an indirect cost rate representing the ratio between the total indirect costs and the benefiting direct costs. This enables each program, activity or fund to assume its fair share of support costs when the indirect cost rate is applied.

Annually, the model is prepared based on budgeted costs and estimated overhead ratios. At year end and after the costs are audited by the external auditors, the model is updated for actual experiences and previous inter-fund transfers are reconciled and the "true-up" adjustments are made in the current year's inter- fund transfers.

The cost allocation plan for non-General Funds are transferred to the General Fund. For all transfers, please refer to the city's transfer schedule.

City of Eastvale │ 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 │ (951) 361-0900 │ www.eastvaleca.gov 32 252
Welcome to the BudgetMessage
June 11, 2025
Honorable Mayor McMinn, Mayor Pro Tem Yow, and Members of the CityCouncil:

In accordance with Eastvale Municipal Code Section 2.08.060(7), it is mypleasure to present the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating andCapital Improvement Budget for the City of Eastvale. This proposalrepresents the city’s 16th annual budget and reects the city’s continuedcommitment to residents through the provision of quality public services,keeping with City Council's high standards, with a focus on nancialsustainability and efciently achieving strategic objectives. As a city, we areproud of our Government Finance Ofcer's Association (GFOA) awardwinning budget. The city continues to be one of the least nancially at riskcities in the state, due to City Council's scally prudent policy priorities andsteadfast conservative nancial management.

Equipped with the City Council's strategic goals and objectives, staff developed the scal year 2025-26 budget plan with a focus on delivering quality andscally sound services to the Eastvale community with an emphasis on ensuring the city is prepared to deliver the construction of the city's Civic Centercampus at the intersection of Limonite and Hamner Avenues. Throughout the budget process, staff ensured department budget proposals reected aninvestment in the Eastvale community and ensured the city's high standards are maintained and enhanced, where possible. These investments will createincredible community experiences focused on ensuring a safe, vibrant, and clean environment for current and future residents. The most important documentthe City Council approves annually is the city's budget; the budget proposals contained within the scal year 2025-26 budget provide resources in the form ofrevenue appropriations and the deployment of services in the form of expenditure appropriations. To ensure department budget proposals match the CityCouncil's desires and strategic objectives from a policy perspective, City Council and staff conducted a budget workshop on April 23, 2025. The combinedbudget, inclusive of transfers, consists of $210.3 million in total revenues and $198.7 million in total expenditures. Total combined estimated fund balance atJune 30, 2026 is projected at $242.3 million.

Strategic PlanThe budget plan incorporates the City Council’s strategic plan adopted on March 24, 2021 and updated on June 25, 2025. Top priorities from the plan includepublic safety, economic development, nancial planning, inclusion, infrastructure, innovation and technology, and organizational development. A list ofstrategic plan initiatives within the budget plan can be found at this link.

General Fund Budget StatusThe General Fund supports the main services of the city including, but not limited to, law enforcement, building safety, communications, code enforcement,engineering, planning, community services and recreation, and internal services such as nance and human resources. These services are supported primarilythrough general taxes and fees. The proposed budget includes $77.3 million in revenues and $75.0 million in expenditures, inclusive of transfers and reserveappropriations. Furthermore, because of Civic Center reserve appropriations the General Fund has a lower than normal overall surplus of $2.3 million,however the General Fund is projected to complete the 2025-26 scal year with a $13.5 million operating budget surplus. Operating revenues total $56.8million and operating expenditures total $43.2 million.

Fire Fund Budget StatusThe Fire Fund supports the city's re protection efforts and comprises property tax revenues and Riverside County Fire/CalFIRE contract expenditures. TheFire Fund budget is proposed with a grand total of $10.8 million in revenue and $9.8 million in expenditures. All of the revenues and expenditures represent City Manager's Budget MessageIntroduction: Budget OverviewFiscal Year 2025-26 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget 253
operating resources and uses. The Fire Fund is projected to complete the 2025-26 scal year with a $932,025 budget surplus. Staff projects contract costsrelating to re protection services will increase 8.0% over scal year 2024-25. Overall, contract costs are increasing 14% as City Council has opted to increaseFire Marshall services to better serve the development community.

Factors Affecting the Budget, Current and Future
Current and Future RevenuesThe budget was created with knowledge that threats to resources and strains on service provision exist at the local government level. As a result, the budgetwas structured in such a way to create a defensive position to protect the integrity of Eastvale's future interests. Delivering quality and scally sound servicesto the Eastvale community is dependent upon strong revenue sources.

Economic ImpactsWith federal policy changes and international tariffs compounding economic uncertainties, staff took a relatively conservative approach to revenuebudgeting this year, estimating only a 1% overall increase in General Fund revenues. Economists have been issuing recession warnings for the last ten years orso, however federal data has consistently shown gross domestic product (GDP) and job growth. Even with GDP and job growth remaining steady, staff hasnoticed a slight downtick in sales tax receipts in discretionary spending business categories such as goods and restaurants, which mirrors to a lesser degreethe trends for the state and county. Furthermore, while federal data still indicates a healthy economy, spending habits might be beginning to shift. Oftenspending habits are tied to narratives and beliefs surrounding the economy, rather than facts and data. The question is whether spending habit changes willcontinue into the future. For these reasons, staff took a conservative approach to revenue forecasting. If revenues trend higher or lower than forecasted,revenues will be adjusted at mid-year.

Sales TaxIn early 2020 a change in business activities by some companies within the city boundaries resulted in sales tax re-allocations from the County Pools directlyto the City of Eastvale. The resulting increase in regular sales tax receipts and county pool allocations increased the sales tax revenue category by 475% fromscal year 2019-2020 to present. However, there remains no absolute guarantee that this new sales tax revenue source will continue into the future. As such,staff has recommended using 40% of the new sales tax revenue to plan for future infrastructure investments and only allocating 60% towards operating uses.Due to economic uncertainties mentioned above the 2025-26 budget includes an overall 2% reduction in sales tax revenues as compared to the prior scalyear. The projection includes a new Walmart facility opening in 2026 and a full year of operation for Rivian, the city's rst automobile point of sale location.

Transient Occupancy TaxThe city’s rst hotel opened in the prior scal year and brought with it Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). When incorporated, the city adopted RiversideCounty's TOT rate of 10%; staff estimates the hotel will generate roughly $430,000 in the 2025-26 scal year.

Current and Future ExpendituresFuture Downtown | The Civic Center CampusThe city is nearing construction on the city's rst Civic Center Campus, and the budget plan includes $87.6 million in budget for the project. The General Fundspecically contributed $33.3 million towards the capital improvement project for construction relating to the development of the city’s portion of the site atHamner and Limonite Avenues. The contribution is a combination of General Fund reserve appropriations and loans to the city's Development Impact Feefunds. The Civic Center will consist of City Hall, Library, Police Station, a park, open space, and parking facilities. The third re station is located at a differentsite on the property will commence with a separate phase of the overall Eastvale Square project. As of publication of this report, the bids for the Civic Centerare open and ve bidders have been pre-qualied. The bid should be awarded in June 2025. In order to prepare for debt issuance, staff has recommended a$7.0 million debt service reserve to ensure the city can pay at least 12 months of debt service in lean economic times.

Police Services, Strategic Plan Target AThe budget plan again invests in the city's law enforcement services. The proposed budget includes the addition of a dedicated Sergeant position and 12additional hours of daily patrol services. This increase to law enforcement services is an extension of previous enhancements to service provision, beginningwith scal year 2020-21. Since 2020-21, the city has added a total of six community service ofcer positions, two additional special enforcement deputies,two additional motor deputies, a commercial enforcement deputy, and a dedicated sergeant. In addition, the city has continued to fund over $130,000annually for quality of life operations. Finally, the proposed budget plan includes the continuation of the Flock Safety Camera program throughout the city.

Fire Services, Strategic Plan Target AThe city contracts for re services with Riverside County; Riverside County then contracts for county re services from the state via CalFIRE. Due to statecuts during the COVID-19 pandemic, subsequent stafng restructuring by Riverside County Fire, and CalFIRE negotiations, costs related to the city’scontract with Riverside County for re services have increased signicantly year over year with no additional service provision. In the current year, staffexpects contract costs to increase by 8.0%. Additionally, staff recommends adding an additional 0.5 full time equivalent dedicated Deputy Fire Marshall andan additional 0.5 full time equivalent dedicated Fire Safety Specialist to better serve the development community. Currently, re services are fully funded byproperty tax collected solely for re protection within the re fund and the fund built a strong reserve over the years. However, staff project that the cost ofre service provision will outpace the re specic property tax revenues and the re fund will require a General Fund subsidy or a change in service levels in 254 the coming years. This will present a challenge as the City Council continues to contemplate expanding re services by stafng a ladder truck either swappingan existing engine apparatus or fully adding a new truck. The purchase of the ladder truck is currently marked as a General Fund reserve, as the Fire Fundcannot support the purchase. The General Fund will very likely be required to contribute resources towards both operational and capital uses in the future.

Current and Future ChallengesAppropriations LimitThe State of California imposed Gann Appropriations Limit continues to have an impact on the operational effectiveness of both the General and Fire Funds.The limit applies to tax revenue and provides an operating threshold which the city cannot cross, effectively limiting the city’s ability to appropriate revenuestowards operating expenditures. In March 2021 the voters passed Measure A, which provided a temporary higher limit for the city to operate under. Thetemporary limit expired in March 2025. In the summer of 2020, the California Legislature approved Assembly Bill 137, which allows a city receiving revenuesfrom the Local Revenue Fund that cause the city to exceed the city's appropriations limit to request a transfer of state appropriations limit to the local agency.The city will request the state's assistance again for the 2025-26 scal year. In order to manage the city’s future ability to provide operating services, such aspolice and re, the city's appropriation limit in addition to any state legislation regarding the appropriations limit, will be closely monitored. For reference, thepermanent limit is $35.3 million and the city will request $561,323 from the state to fulll current operating service levels.

Funding ServicesThe nancial stability of Eastvale will depend upon its ability to withstand both positive and negative economic uncertainties. The pandemic caused aninationary surge in tandem with an increase in local spending, which helped the city weather the storm. However, as ination caused an increase in cityrevenues it also caused an increase in city costs. The city spends the largest amount of budget appropriations on public safety, for both law enforcement andre services. These services are contracted through the County of Riverside and the city has little control over rising costs. As a result, the city maintains apublic safety rate stabilization reserve, which totals $3 million. As any service, public safety costs are not immune from economic impacts and inationaryuctuations to the cost to provide public safety services. Additionally, unlike many cities located along the I-15 corridor, the City of Eastvale does not receivea large portion of property tax revenues nor has it requested voters to pass a local sales tax measure. As a result, the city relies heavily upon Bradley Burnssales tax revenues to provide services for the community. Staff has continued to ensure, through the budget process, that reserve levels set by City Councilpolicy are met and additional funds are set aside to help offset future economic impacts and allow the city to continue to provide excellent services andmaintain critical infrastructure that the community depends upon.

Infrastructure for the Future: FiveYear Capital Improvement Budget The city's ve year capital improvement budget includes 20 budgetedprojects for a total of $94.6 million in 2025-26. The City Council provideddirection regarding the priority of the projects and identied all projects aseither critical, essential, or desirable at the May 14, 2025 CapitalImprovement Plan workshop. The major projects budgeted for 2025-26 arediscussed below.

Civic Center Campus: $90.1 MillionFunding Source General Fund, DIF, Lease Revenue BondsStaff estimates the Civic Center Campus project will cost from $200 to$220 million, depending on nal construction bids received in June. Thebudget plan includes $90.1 million in budget across the General Fund,Development Impact Fees (DIF), and Lease Revenue Bond Proceeds. Theproject consists of a City Hall, Library, Police Station, Plaza, and a Park. Asecond phase Parking Structure is also included in the CIP budget; $4.5million is budgeted for design, engineering, and property acquisition.

Hellman Avenue Widening $5.0 MillionFunding Source: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees, General FundHellman Avenue widening from Walters Street to River Road is a criticalproject in the city and has received almost 100% funding from WesternRiverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation UniformMitigation Fees (TUMF). The project totals $25.8 million and the city isrequired to fund $550,000, which will consist of General Fund and Gas Taxcontributions. Staff will kick-off the project with design, engineering, andproperty acquisition in scal year 2025-26.

Citywide Trafc Signal Synchronization Phase 1 $4.6 MillionFunding Source: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees, Measure A 255 The second project for Trafc Signal Synchronization is scheduled to continue into Fiscal Year 2025-26. The project totals $6.6 million and $4.6 million inbudgeted in the new scal year. The project consists of installation of synchronization components and ber optic lines to relay signalization patterns by thecity's trafc signal synchronization master plan. The project includes four major corridors in phase one, Hamner Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and SchleismanRoad, and Scholar Way. The project is primarily funded by TUMF with a portion of design engineering funded by Measure A.

Reserves
Assigned Reserves: Operating ReserveThe city continues to fully fund the General Fund 50% operating reserve.This reserve ensures that in times of economic strife or other emergencysituations impacting the city’s ability to collect revenue, the city cancontinue to operate. The proposed budget includes funding the reserve at$21,620,591. Additionally, the city is fully funding the Fire Fund 75%operating reserve totaling $7,373,231. To allow for adequate cash ow forCapital Improvement Grants, cover special assessment district negativefund balances, land purchases, and the city's Business Incentive LoanProgram, $16.8 million is held in assigned reserves. Committed Reserves: Capital InfrastructureWith the 2025-26 scal year budget plan, the city continues to maintaincapital reserves. Total committed reserves for the Civic Center Project totalover $89.8 million. This gure is lower than previous years, but budget hasbeen appropriated from this reserve to fund construction in 2025-26. Anadditional $29.7 million for the Civic Center Parking Structure is also held inreserve. Other Committed ReservesThe city holds a myriad of other committed reserves, including a re truckpurchase, pension obligation, public safety rate increase stabilization, CivicCenter debt service reserve and several capital replacement reserves. Thesereserves total $15.2 million. Unassigned ReservesStaff projects the city will end the scal year with $2.7 million in unassignedreserves.

Conclusion
The focus of the 2025-26 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget is to ensure the city's capability to successfully maintain operations and strategicallyplan for the Civic Center Campus while maintaining the highest level of efciency of service provision for residents and businesses. The budget plan providesthe City Council an opportunity to accomplish strategic goals and objectives for the benet of the Eastvale community for the next scal year and offers theadded benet of growing the city’s assigned and committed reserves.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, and City Council for their outstanding leadership, strategic direction, and prioritysetting. I would also like to acknowledge the dedication, expertise, and time commitment of each department in helping to develop this budget. Finally, aspecial thanks goes to Finance Director Wells, Finance Manager De La Hoya, and the Finance Department for their continued dedication and unwaveringcommitment to transparent and nancial excellence.

Respectfully Submitted,
Mark OrmeCity Manager
Previous Next
256

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.2
June 11, 2025
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance entled: AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER

10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN

STREETS

Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014; June 24, 2015; July 11, 2018; January 26, 2022; and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:

Segment 2: 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue Segment 23: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road Segment 28: Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way Segment 32: Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel Segment 33: Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue Segment 46: Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of appropriate and safe travel speeds, and to protect the general public from the risks posed by reckless or unpredictable driving behavior. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
257
Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads.

Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

In California, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be set using an Engineering and Traﬃc Survey (ETS), rather than through arbitrary methods. This approach ensures that speed limits are defensible and appropriate for the roadway condions. The CVC also includes the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350), which states:

“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traﬃc on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”

Properly posted speed limits assist law enforcement in cing drivers who violate the Basic Speed Law and give drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The engineering and traﬃc survey study involves the three major elements of data collecon and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Secon 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traﬃc Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edion, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1 .

Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2 .

Collision records
3 .

Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:

Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideraon for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilies, users of personal assisve mobility devices, and the unhoused.

The City Council last adopted an Engineering and Traﬃc Survey on July 24, 2013, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:

These segments were studied for the following reasons:

1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
258
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way - Segment 28 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel - Segment 32 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue - Segment 33

2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue - Segment 2 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road - Segment 23 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road - Segment 46

Based on the ETS results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these six (6) segments is shown below:

Segment No.

Street
Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and
Sumner Avenue
40 40
23 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Avenue and
Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd
50 45
28 Harrison Avenue
Limonite Avenue and
Blossom Way
45 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to
Cucamonga Creek Channel
(New)
None
45 33
Limonite Avenue
Cucamonga Creek Channel
to Archibald Avenue
(New
None
45 46
Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman
Road
35 35

The recommended speed limits were reviewed and found acceptable by the Riverside County Sheriff's Office, which provides contract law enforcement services to the City of Eastvale.

To ensure enforceability, each speed limit recommendaon must be supported by an ETS that can withstand legal scruny. This survey includes all required documentaon under State law. Once the ordinance is adopted, updates to posted speed limits will be implemented accordingly.

Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
259
Several addional speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esmated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, and January 26, 2022.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2025 Speed Survey Amendment Phase 1
Attachment 2 - Ordinance

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
260

2025
Citywide Speed Zone Survey (Draft)

Adopted on __________ by Ordinance 25-__
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 23-13
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 22-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 2018-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 15-04
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July 24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10

Approved By:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650

Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra Group, Inc.
261

262

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9

4.0 Roadway Segment Field Review 11

4.1 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12

4.2 Factors That May Be Considered 12

4.3 Recommended Speed Limits 12

4.4 Speed Limit Signing 13

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 14

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance 14

APPENDIX

APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Table
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
263

264
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for six (6) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied, that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified, and that the provisions of AB 43 have been incorporated in the analysis. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022, while other sections went into effect on January 1, 2023. All sections are currently in effect. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, which took effect on January 1, 2023, when Revision 8 of the CA MUTCD was approved, and on April 1, 2025, when Revision 9 of the CA MUTCD was approved.

On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 January 26, 2022 and January 11, 2023. Since the January 11, 2023 City Council approval of the speed surveys, the following six (6) street segments have been studied:
265
Introduction
2 2 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 23 Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road 28 Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 32 Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel33 Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue 46 Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road

The segments below were studied for the following reasons:

1. Establish the speed limit for a new segment:
 Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way – Segment 28  Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel – Segment 32  Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue – Segment 33

2. Segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
 65th Street between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue – Segment 2  Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu Galleano Ranch Road – Segment 23  Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road – Segment 46

This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the six (6) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.

At six (6) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the 2025 CA MUTCD 2014, rev 9. Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix E. 266
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The engineering and traffic survey study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:
 Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, passed in 2021, introduced concepts from Vision Zero into the determination of speed limits. AB 1938, passed in 2022, made further modifications. The goal of Vision Zero is to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries to zero, based on the Safe System Approach. The basic tenet of Vision Zero is that human beings are vulnerable to traffic collisions, the severity of injuries and death are directly affected by speed, and roadway speeds should be reduced wherever possible, using the Safe System Approach, to achieve Vision Zero. AB 43 maintains the use of the 85th percentile speed as the base for setting speed limits, but makes it easier to reduce speed limits. The effects of AB 43 are discussed below, under Analysis.

267
Study Methodology
4 Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for six (6) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.

Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 (two years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.

AB 43 also allows the speed limits as determined above, to be reduced an additional 5 mph or the existing speed limits to be maintained under certain conditions. If a local authority, after 268
Study Methodology
5 completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance:
 Reduce the speed limit by an additional five miles per hour on a section of highway designated as a Safety Corridor or if the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.  Retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
 Determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Crash Data on California State Highways (Road Miles, Travel, Crashes, Crash Rates) published by Caltrans. The latest edition, 2022, was used for this 2025 analysis.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years Where: Number of midblock collisions based on 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.

269
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey

Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the six (6) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

 Posted speed limit
 Direction of survey
 Date and time of speed survey
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed in each direction
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 15th percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent under pace speed
 Average speed

The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 270

7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(Amended April 2025)

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 40 40 No Change - 85th%ile 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limit N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W None 51 50 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue N/S & E/W None 41 35 Establishing Speed Limit – 85%ile, Option 1, Very heavy truck traffic, many peds, no bike lanes 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decreased - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road N/S 50 48 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the north. 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue2 N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way2 N/S 45 40 35 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b) 29 30 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic 32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Ch. NE/SW None3 52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 33 Cucamonga Creek Ch to Archibald Avenue NE/SW None3 52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1, Ped & bike safety, CVC 22358.6(b) 3435 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage, no bike lanes (Continued on Next Page)
271

8 No

Street

Between

Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) E/W None 59 55 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 50 47 45 Reduced - 85th%ile, Continuity with adjacent segment 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 43 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2, CVC 22358.7. 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None 43 40 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1Roadway segments studied for 2025 E&TS are highlighted in gray. 2 Segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Rd & Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Ave since the character of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave. 3Two segments, currently studied (Nos. 32 & 33), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 4See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA laws, AB 43 & AB 1938. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 272

9 Survey Results

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis

The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the six (6) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.

Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”

It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 106
Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data

Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road:

Collision Rate = 3 x 10 6
25,139 x 365 x 0.83 x 2

= 0.20 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)

The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2022 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the six (6) segments studied in the 2025 analysis, and are shown in the table below.

No. Street Between Lane Type
Statewide
Collision
Rate1
2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 20 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 6 lanes, divided 1.17 26 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 2 lanes, undivided 1.24 32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 4 lanes, divided 1.17 33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 4 lanes, divided 1.17 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 4 lanes, undivided 1.24 1 Statewide Collision Rates listed are averages for Suburban (Rural Inside City + Urban Outside City) roads.

273

10 Table 2: Collision Analysis (Amended April 2025)
No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 6,155 0 0.00 1.24 No 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3,755 1 0.24 0.93 No 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0.14 0.93 No 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20,934 7 0.19 1.29 No 9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2,497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 21,256 9 0.88 1.18 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3,828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 4,800 0 0.00 1.16 No 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.72 0.91 No 23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 25,139 3 0.20 1.17 No 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,500 5 0.32 1.05 No 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.06 1.83 No 26 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 0.21 1,100 3,015 0 0.00 1.24 No 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No 31 Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No (Continued on Next Page)
274

11 No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel (New) 0.60 3,150 14,735 1 0.16 1.17 No 33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue (New) 0.56 2,950 15.549 0 0.00 1.17 No 34 Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 1.17 No 35 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 29,400 35 1.07 1.17 No 36 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7,806 4 0.62 1.32 No 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 9,900 0 0.00 1.32 No 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 6,389 0 0.00 1.24 No 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4,721 0 0.00 0.91 No 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6,678 1 0.20 1.60 No 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 Newly-surveyed roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 2-year period for newly surveyed segments and 3-year period for prior segments. 3 Col/MVM = Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 4 The previous survey on Harrison Avenue (Segment 27) included the segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Avenue. The latest surveyed segment (Segment 28) includes Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way since, the portion of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave, the previously-surveyed segment, in width and traffic volume..
275

12 Survey Results

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review

Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The roadway segments were driven and videorecorded by Mr. Alan Perkins, Senior Engineering Technician, and reviewed by Ruth Smith, Senior Traffic Engineer (contracted through Ardurra Group).

The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were noted in the study on the Strip Maps, found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and Section 22358.6(b).

The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Factors Indicating Land or Facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, including the presence of sidewalks, bikeways, crosswalks, schools, parks, employment centers, retail, senior centers, cultural areas, religious facilities, health/medical facilities and transit stops
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Adjacent Land Uses
276
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 SECTION 4.0

SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Factors That May Be Considered

In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.

 Most recent collision record (mid-block)
 Roadway characteristics
 Shoulder condition
 Grade
 Alignment
 Sight Distance
 Roadside development and environment
 Parking practices and pedestrian activity
 Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
 Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
 Residential density

The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

4.2 Recommended Speed Limits

The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 277
Survey Findings and Recommendations
14 4.3 Speed Limit Signing

All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.

278
Summary and Conclusions

15 SECTION 5.0

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 9, Section 2B.13.

2. Daily traffic counts for six (6) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2025 on March 25.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.

5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on four (4) of the six (6) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed or established, as listed below.

Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit

No.

Street

Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
23 Hamner Avenue Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-
Galleano Ranch Road 50 45 Reducing speed limit
by 5 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
28 Harrison Avenue Limonite Avenue & Blossom
Way 45 35 Reducing speed limit
by 10 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue &
Cucamonga Creek Channel
(new street segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)
33 Limonite Avenue Cucamonga Creek Channel &
Archibald Avenue (new street
segment)
None 45 Establishing Speed
Limit – 85th
percentile, CVC
22358.6(b)

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance

Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as provided on the following pages.
279
280

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated April 2025)
281

282
1 Appendix A

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific two-year interval of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.

In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:

If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.

If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.

Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 283
2 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS

Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar or lidar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits

22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits

22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 284
3 Appendix A

40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Downward Speed Zoning Exceptions

22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Initial Rounding to Nearest Five MPH

22358.6 (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Note: Section 22358.6 was modified by Assembly Bill 1938, and the modifications became effective on January 1, 2023.

Additional Five MPH Reduction

22358.7 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine 285
4 Appendix A

and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).

In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. Note: Revision 8 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2014 Edition, effective on January 26, 2023, includes the provisions of this section, making them currently effective.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.7 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.

Maintaining Existing Speed Limit

22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 286
5 Appendix A

1, 2022, then was amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit

22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Speed Trap 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
287
6 Appendix A

(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning and became effective on January 1, 2022.):

(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

288
7 Appendix A

(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:

(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone, business activity district or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business 289
8 Appendix A

activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then modified by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)

Speed Trap Evidence

40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c)When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey

627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.

(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following

(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of 290
9 Appendix A

separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Business District

235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District

515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination

240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
(c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

291
10 Appendix A

Maximum Speed Limit

22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law

22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations

22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.

(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits

22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:

(a) Fifteen miles per hour:

1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.

2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.

3) On any alley.

(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
292
11 Appendix A

1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.

2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For the purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transporatation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the grant funding, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

State Highways within Local Jurisdictions

22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway.

(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

22354.5 (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular 293
12 Appendix A

portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department of the California Highway Patrol.

(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the speed limit.

Boundary Line Streets

22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways

22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

294

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated April 2025)
295

296
17 Appendix B

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated April 2025)

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates.

Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a 297
18 Appendix B

particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).

3. Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC 298
19 Appendix B

Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85th- percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7.

12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).

Support:
12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.

CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.

Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways.
12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.

Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State 299
20 Appendix B

Highway System
12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.

CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.

Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:

1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.

2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more of the required crash weighting factors listed in the Table 2B-105(CA) shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.

Option:
12p Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Standard:
12q The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12r Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.

Guidance:
12s A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.

Option:
12t For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. 12u To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.

Standard:
300
21 Appendix B

12v A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.

Option:
12w Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12x Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.

Option:
12y Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet. Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet. Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.

Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.

Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
301
22 Appendix B

CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:

1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.

2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.

3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:

4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.

5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.

6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. 7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c). 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are 302
23 Appendix B

traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 303
24 Appendix B

vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that 304
25 Appendix B

conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.

Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed 305
26 Appendix B

approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
306
27 Appendix B

• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed 307
28 Appendix B

limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
308
29 Appendix B

79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
309
30 Appendix B

b. The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
c. Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
b. A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352. 96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).

Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
 The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are 310
31 Appendix B

met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
105 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part

Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

311
32 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

312
33 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

313
34 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

314
35 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

315
36 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

316
37 Appendix B

Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD

Text Headings

Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases

Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed—the summation of the instantaneous or spot-measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
317
38 Appendix B

Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)—the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 318
39 Appendix B

exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study—the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities—a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared-use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
319
40 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
320

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated April 2025)
321
322
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586

0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments
:

Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
323
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 2
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
40 mph
No Change, same as existing
85th percentile speed

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Heavy pedestrian & vehicular traffic during school. Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and bike traffic.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane, Divided. Straight alignment. bike lanes, but substandard.

Comments:

Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary at Harrison Ave.

Residences do not front on 65th St. - no direct access.

Residential
38 - 47 mph
40 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted median
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
46 65th Street
Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
6,155
Appendix C
324
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No

0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
Appendix C
325
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642

0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
326
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: E
ast/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
327
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segm ent No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Co
mments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
328
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segm
ent (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700

1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
329
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580

1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
330
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Lim it Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.98 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010

1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
331
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 m
ph, due to on-street parking and residential density)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030

0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Cul-de-sac near River Road.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
332
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.78 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650

1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.

Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comment
s:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
333
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limi t Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 m
ph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.93 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575

0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comment
s:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
334
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comment
s:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
335
Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Between: Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.18 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
9 0.88, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 EB lanes and 1 EB Auxiliary lane and 2 WB lanes with 1 WB Auxiliary lane between Hamner and Goodman. 3 lanes in each direction between Goodman and I-15 Freeway.

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
50 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,323

0.44 3 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
35-44 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between I-15 Freeway and Hamner Ave.
21,256 vpd
Light Industrial and Commercial
Appendix C
336
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075

1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Com
mercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety )
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
337
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.14 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.

Comments:

Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.

Appendix C
338
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.39 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626

0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
Appendix C
339
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curves.

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
340
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Goodman Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between:

Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue
North/South & East/\
Traffic Data
4,800
3,600

0.68 Lane Configuration: 1 Lane NB & 2 Lanes SB and 1 Lane EB/WB; 2-way LT lane Street Classification: Local
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 41 mph
10 mph Pace: 31-40 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns.No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed, but regular violations. Many peds crossing during shift-change.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment with S-curve just south of Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd. 1 SB/WB Lane from north of 90 deg angle to Hamner. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galeano Ranch Rd.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Mix of retail & big box uses.

Recommendation 35 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�.'-vk Vl-1 Qn-:: 7 /Jo/Zo,ei t I ,_ �11. •' Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date �,,,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 0, � Segment #19 Appendix C
341
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295

0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
342
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
343
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800

0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway width reductions.

Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
344
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 23
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Ave & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
North/South
Traffic Data
25,139
4,400

0.83 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Commercial, Residential and Industrial
38 - 47 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:
5-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Residences do not front onto Hamner Avenue - no direct access.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Matches segments to the south.

Appendix C
345
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;!
J} Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 Appendix C
346
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�Wlµt- 1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment#25 Appendix C
347
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
348
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: S chleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segm
ent (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down
to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080

1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Sm
ith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
349
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
40 Harrison Ave
Limonite Avenue & Blossom Way
North/South
Traffic Data
3,015
1,100

0.21 1 Lane in Each Direction
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Residential
30 - 39 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. On-street parking on West side, small park, Roadway Geometrics:
2-Lane, undivided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Residences do not front onto Harrison Avenue - no direct access.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 1, CVC 22358.6(b)
Appendix C
350
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segm
ent (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100

0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.

Roadway Geometrics:

C
omments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
351
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segm
ent (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120

1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.

Roadway Geometrics:

C
omments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
352
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 31
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segm
ent (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070

0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5
mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
353
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
15,549
6,100

1.16 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
44 - 53 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.08

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. 1-Lane Roundabout west of Archibald Ave. Curved alignment Comments:

This is a new street segment that was not previously studied.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1, Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, CVC22358.6(b).

Appendix C
354
Engineering Traffic Survey Summary
Location:

Between:

Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed (mph):

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
4/22/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Ave
Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Ave
E/W
Traffic Data
15,549
2,950

0.56 4 lanes, divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Industrial
42 - 51 mph
None
Collision History
1/1/2023 - 12/31/2024
0 0.00

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Recommendation
50 Established
Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b), segment is "S" curve ending at flood control channel.

Appendix C
355
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:

Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

C
;i,-
1Y
H!lt:t s
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. 7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (, • Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment# Appendix C
356
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 29,400
Length of Segment (feet): 8,100
Length of Segment (miles): 1.53
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted or raised median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 52 mph
10 mph Pace: 44-53 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 35
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 1.07
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing maior streets. No bike lane. No oarkina allowed.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment w/vertical curb at 1-15. 2 EB/WB Lanes West of Mulan St. to West of Hamner Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Retail and residential
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: No
Revised Speed Limit: 45 mph
� Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
6'�) � VVI 4:b 7/10)"2-01e I I ll:IO �)!,

1. #
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�,�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment# Appendix C
357
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S M illiken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.86 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.

Co
mments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
Appendix C
358
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sum ner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.6 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
359
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellm an Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380

0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
360
Location: River Road
Between: Hellm an Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.32 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970

0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.

Agricultural land west of Hall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
361
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.32 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500

0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
362
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Riverside Drive Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 9,900
Length of Segment (feet): 2,300
Length of Segment (miles): 0.44
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2-way LT lane Street Classification: Secondary
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 47mph
10 mph Pace: 38-47 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 50 mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking, but illegal parking - large trucks park on soft shoulder on north side, heavy truck use, no bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:

Alignment varies, with straight sections, but mostly curved.

Comments:

Posted 55 mph west of Hamner in Ontario.

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped land
Recommendation 45 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 45
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
� '--t,,t,_ 11--- j,,__ 7µ0/Z1.Jtt8 I 1- ;!1I. ;;
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
�� * Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Segment# Appendix C
363
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.98 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
364
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.93 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
365
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sum ner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.32 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
366
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040

0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
367
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location:

Between:

Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No Change
85th percentile speed, Option 2, CVC 22358.7.

School / Residential
34 - 43 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes, painted shoulders between Orange and Baltimore.

Comments:

High School, intermediate school, elementary school, & public library adjacent to street. Lots of congestion.

Residences do not front onto Scholar Way - no direct access. 43 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
North/South
Traffic Data
6,389
3,300

0.63 2 Lanes in Each Direction with 2-Way Left Turn Lane, partial painted median Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Undivided. Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.

Appendix C
368
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleism an Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
369
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Lim onite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700

0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.

Roadway Geometrics:

Approved and Authorized for release by City
Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5
mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
370
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 49
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935

1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway narrow between Schleism
an and Orange.

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
371
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 50
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422

1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
372
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleism an Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 51
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542

0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway
near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.

Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
373
374

APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated April 2025)

375

376

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE

0.49 mi

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET

UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North

SCHOLAR WAY

JAMESTOWN AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
377
Appendix D
378
Appendix D
379

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)

0.31 mi

RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
35 MPH •

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
• 35 MPH

Appendix D
380

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

SUMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
68TH STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
Appendix D
381

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET

0.5 mi

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
I-15 INTERSTATE HWY

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •

WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
Appendix D
382

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET

1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

RIVER STREET

ARCHIBALD
AVENUE

WIND RIVER RD

BARONROAD
BLUFF

GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
Appendix D
383

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD
WIND

RIVER RD

GRAPEWIN
STREET

CHANDLER STREET

FIELDMASTER
STREET

SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK

EASTVALEPKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
384

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

INDUSTRIAL

ARCHI BALD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
Appendix D
385
Appendix D
386
Appendix D
387

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT

0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •

BELLEGRAVE AVENUECITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL

INTERSTATE HWY

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
388

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BLOSSOM WAY

HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.5 mi

BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CEDAR CREEK ROAD
30 MPH •
• 30 MPH

REDSIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
30 MPH •

PINE GROVE PL
Appendix D
389

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.

HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY
.50 mi

CANTU-GALLEANO
RANCH
RD.

COMMERCIAL
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
&IT< LIMIT(I-15)
HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
GOODMAN RD.
&IT< LIMIT
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
&IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
390

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE

1.53 mi

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

SELBY AVENUE

SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
391

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY
0

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
• MPH
SCHOOL =ONE

• 40 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

HIGH SCHOOL
PARK
• 40 MPH

COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE

COBBLE CREEK DRIVE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
392

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL
ವ MP+

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
ವ MP+

HIGH SCHOOL

RESIDENTIAL
PARK

CARROLLTON PLACE

MAYFIELD STREET
Appendix D
393

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North

FIELDMASTER STREET

HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi

RESIDENTIAL

FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
EK

C
H
E
R
R
Y

MEADOW
BROOK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK

HALL RD

ARCHIBALD AVE
Appendix D
394

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Goodman Way
Street Segment: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road to Hamner Avenue Segment Length (MI): 0.68 mi
North

GOODMAN WAY

RESIDENTIAL

NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL
• 35 MPH
35 MPH•
35 MPH• • 35 MPH
Appendix D
395

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi

CITRUS STREET

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH

FAIR GROUNDS

RESIDENTIALPARK
Appendix D
396

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
397

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER

HAMNER AVENUE

0.91 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH

SWAN LAKE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
398
Appendix D
399

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP

Street Name: HAMNER AVENUE
Street Segment: CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD & RIVERSIDE DRIVE Segment Length (MI): 1.23 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
VACANT

LAND UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
400

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP

Street Name: Hamner Avenue
Street Segment: Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street Segment Length (MI): 0.99 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE MISSION BLVD

SR 60 FREWAY

UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL

PHILADELPHIA AVENUE
Appendix D
401

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CHANDLER STREET
North

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH

NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
402
Appendix D
403
Appendix D
404

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD TO

0.97 mi

CONSERVATION
AREA

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

CHANDLER STREET

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1)50 MPH •

UNDEVELOPED

CHANDLER STREET
Appendix D
405

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITHELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

UNDEVELOPED
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
50 MPH •
SCHOOL

WALTERS STREET

ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKET
STREET

PINE AVENUE

PRAIRIE SMOKE
ROAD

LANDERWOOD DRIVE

BICKMORE AVENUE

1.54 mi

CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE

LIMONITE AVE
PARK

INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL

KIMBALL AVENUE

CHINO CORONA ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
406

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NorthNOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE

LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT

0.20 mi

HELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

INDUSTRIAL

LIMONITE AVE

INDUSTRIAL

SUMMIT DR

INDUSTRIAL

HELLMAN AVENU

CITY LIMIT

ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)

1.54 mi

KIMBALL AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
407
Appendix D
408
Appendix D
409

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Archibald Avenue to Sumner Avenue
Segment Length (MI): 1 mi
North

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

ONTARIO RANCH ROAD

NOT TO SCALE

SUMNER AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE • 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
410

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Sumner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 1.53 mi
North

NOT TO SCALE

AGRICULTURE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH

LIMONITE
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
SUMNER AVENUE • 45 MPH
I-15 FWY

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

UNDEVELOPED

AGRICULTURE
RETAIL
Appendix D
411

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD

MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS(I-15)

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL
60 MPH •
Appendix D
412

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

ORANGE STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL

ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •

SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH

SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
413

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD

0.26 mi

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
414

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVER ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE

0.75 mi

NOT TO SCALE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

HALL ROAD

AGRICULTURE

AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
415
Appendix D
416

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Riverside Drive
Street Segment: Hamner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 0.44 mi
North

NOT TO SCALE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

HAMNER AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
I-15 FWY
• 50 MPH

MILLIKEN AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
417

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHI BALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH

CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

COMMERCIAL
Appendix D
418

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD
SUMNER

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

HARRISON
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL

COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUE
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
419

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED45 MPH •
Appendix D
420

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE

0.58 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN

HAMMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
421
Appendix D
422

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

SCHOLAR WAY

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHOLAR

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

LIMONITE AVE
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)WAY

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
Appendix D
423
Appendix D
424

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET

1.12 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER

CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
425

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

1.03 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

ORCHARD
PARK

SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
426

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

WHITEWELL ROAD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

0.29 mi

NOT TO SCALE

WHITEWELL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH

PRAIRIE

SMOKE RD
Appendix D
427
428

APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated April 2025)

429

430
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:05
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
431
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 8 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 7 2 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 6% 8% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 80% 78% 73%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 6 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 18%
35 0 3 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
432
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix E
433
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *
45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix E
434
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C
42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix E
435
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:00
62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:25
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH 56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A
52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79% 47 2 2 47 X X X X 4
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH
43 0 0 43 0
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
436
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 4 0 58 X X X X 4
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:05
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:30
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
437
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
438
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *
33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
32 0 1 32 X 1 A
31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%
29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 6
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
439
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:20
52 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 7
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:40
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A
43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%
39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
440
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:55
59 0 0 59 0
58 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 2 0 56 X X 2
55 3 2 55 X X X X X 5
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 *
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13% 45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5
42 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
441
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:10
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:50
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%
29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%
27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%
25 2 2 25 X X X X 4
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
442
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 4 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 5 3 51 X X X X X X X X 8 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 3 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 *
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 38% 44% 41%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 C
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 60% 54% 56%
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 2% 2% 3%
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 *
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
443
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 6
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:40
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:15
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix E
444
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
445
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:40
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 0 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:00
49 1 1 49 X X 2 *
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E
43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
446
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:30
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:20
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing 37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 1 0 34 X 1
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5
32 2 0 32 X X 2
31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
447
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 * Time
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 * From: 11:50
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 P Time
40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A To: 12:20
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 C
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 E Existing
37 5 2 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 6 36 X X X X X X X X 8 *
35 0 3 35 X X X 3 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5
31 2 0 31 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 3 0 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 4% 12% 10%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 2 0 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 60% 74% 65%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 36% 14% 25%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 35 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
448
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:20
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:40
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *
52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%
49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E
46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11% 45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 0 3 41 X X X 3
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 38 0 1 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
449
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:50
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:10
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing
47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%
37 0 0 37 0
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
450
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:00
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time
50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:20
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
451
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 1:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 1:25
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 P
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 A
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
41 6 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 22% 14% 20% 39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 69%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
452
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 2 63 X X 2 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive 62 0 1 62 X 1
61 0 1 61 X 1
60 1 0 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 1 1 58 X X 2
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 Date:
56 1 3 56 X X X X 4
55 3 4 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 0 2 54 X X 2 * Time
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 * From: 11:55
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5 P
51 5 2 51 X X X X X X X 7 A Time
50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 12:15
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4 E
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 16% 18%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 62% 57%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 24% 22% 25%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 51 MPH 48 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 56 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
453
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
454
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 2 56 X X 2
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:10
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time
50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:30
49 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing
47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
455
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way Limonite Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:50
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:20
49 4 2 49 X X X X X X 6
48 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C
41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%
39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound S outhbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
456
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Blossom Way
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 From: 11:30
42 2 0 42 X X 2
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 3 0 40 X X X 3 To: 12:20
39 2 1 39 X X X 3 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
36 0 5 36 X X X X X 5 P
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 5 5 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
33 2 3 33 X X X X X 5 E
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 1 3 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 2% 8% 18%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 0 3 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 68% 70% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 30% 22% 17%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
457
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:00
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P
52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A
51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13% 49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *
48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH
43 0 1 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
458
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue) 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:00
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:25
59 0 1 59 X 1
58 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing
57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5
55 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *
53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *
52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P
51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%
49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E
48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 6
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound S outhbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
459
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
Appendix E
460
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Cucamonga Creek Channel 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 10:25
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:00
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 0 3 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 *
52 2 1 52 X X X 3 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 P % Over Pace: 4% 18% 10%
49 4 4 49 X X X X X X X X 8 A
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % In Pace: 68% 80% 73% 47 4 8 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 28% 2% 17%
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH 43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 3 0 42 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 3 0 40 X X X 3
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 38 1 0 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
461
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Cucamonga Creek Channel - Archibald Avenue 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:05
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:25
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 1 57 X 1 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 6 2 54 X X X X X X X X 8
53 1 1 53 X X 2
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 4 2 51 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 6% 18% 19%
49 6 4 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 P % In Pace: 74% 68% 66%
47 4 3 47 X X X X X X X 7 A
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Under Pace: 20% 14% 15% 45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 E
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 43 2 4 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 5 42 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4
39 0 2 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
462
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 7
54 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time
53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:45
52 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *
51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time
50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:05
49 1 2 49 X X X 3 C
48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing
47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *
45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 2 3 44 X X X X X 5
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%
37 3 0 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
463
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 1 57 X 1 Date:
56 4 1 56 X X X X X 5
55 2 2 55 X X X X 4
54 2 0 54 X X 2 Time
53 5 2 53 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 10:05
52 3 5 52 X X X X X X X X 8 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
50 2 5 50 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:25
49 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 A
48 3 4 48 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing
47 8 1 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 4 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 1 5 43 X X X X X X 6
42 0 4 42 X X X X 4
41 1 0 41 X 1 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 2 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 74% 76% 72%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 16%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
464
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
Appendix E
465
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:20
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:15
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%
35 0 4 35 X X X X 4
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
466
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:00
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C
34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%
29 4 0 29 X X X X 4
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4
26 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%
25 3 0 25 X X X 3
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
467
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
468
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:20
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%
37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 4
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 3 30 X X X 3
29 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
469
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 2 1 54 X X X 3 Time
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 From: 12:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:45
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *
45 8 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 P
43 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
42 8 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 14% 18% 16%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 82% 74% 78%
37 1 1 37 X X 2
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 8% 6%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
470
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:50
59 3 2 59 X X X X X 5
58 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P
54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A
53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C
52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%
49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 2 0 43 X X 2
42 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 1 40 X 1
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
471
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 2 0 55 X X 2
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:15
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4
51 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:35
49 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%
39 2 0 39 X X 2
38 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
472
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 1 54 X X 2 Time
53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:55
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing
47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%
39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
473
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:30
52 3 1 52 X X X X 4
51 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:50
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C
45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
474
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 1 48 X X 2
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 * From: 10:50
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 * Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 P To: 11:40
39 1 1 39 X X 2 A
38 7 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C Existing
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 5 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 *
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5
31 0 1 31 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 32% 6% 10%
29 3 0 29 X X X 3
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 64% 72% 64%
27 0 0 27 0
26 1 2 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 4% 22% 26%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 33 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
475
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:20
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:40
39 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 0 4 34 X X X X 4
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 1 1 32 X X 2
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%
29 2 0 29 X X 2
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
476
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:25
42 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:00
39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing
37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4
31 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
477
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 3 56 X X X 3
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:00
52 0 2 52 X X 2 *
51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time
50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:20
49 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E
45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix E
478
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:00
52 3 2 52 X X X X X 5
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:25
49 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%
39 2 1 39 X X X 3
38 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%
37 0 0 37 0
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
479
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:00
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing
37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 0 2 35 X X 2 P
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A
33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%
29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix E
480

APPENDIX F
Collision Data Table
Updated April 2025
(to be provided)
481

482

APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s)
Certifications (Updated April 2025)
(to be provided)
483

484

ORDINANCE NO. 25-__

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE , CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN STREETS

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Collision Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
485

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 55
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 51
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 41 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 48
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 55
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 55
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 47
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 40
29 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 52
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 52
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 52
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 47
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 43
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
486

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40

(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above- listed streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 35 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 50
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 45
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 50
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 35
29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
487

No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 45
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 45
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 50
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 45
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 35
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35

Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect."

SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

488

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ____, 2025.

__________________________________________
Michael McMinn
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Government Services Director
489

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Government Services Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-__, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 11th of June, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ of ____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Government Services Director
490

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.3
June 11, 2025
Eastvale Schools Committee Appointments
Prepared By:

Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council appoint a revised primary member on the Eastvale Schools Committee.

Summary
Currently, the Eastvale Schools Commi ee meets at a !me that conﬂicts with the personal schedule of Mayor Pro Tem Yow. Due to this, she is unable to a end the commi ee mee!ngs. Staﬀ is requesting the City Council to appoint a revised primary member to the Eastvale Schools Committee.

Background
Every year in December, the City Council approves a list of commi ee appointments for the upcoming calendar year. Included in that list of appointments is the Eastvale Schools Commi ee.

The commi ee meets is scheduled to meet at 2:00 p.m. at the Eastvale Community Center on the following upcoming dates:

September 25, 2025
January 22, 2026
April 16, 2026

The current appointees for the commi ee are Mayor Pro Tem Yow and Councilmember Rigby as the primaries and Mayor McMinn as the alternate.

Environmental 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
491
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - 2025 Committee Appointment List.pdf

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
492
Clint Lorimore Primary December 2024 December 2025
Mike McMinn Primary December 2024 December 2025
Todd Rigby Alternate December 2024 December 2025
Todd Rigby Primary December 2024 December 2025
Jocelyn Yow Primary December 2024 December 2025
Mike McMinn Alternate December 2024 December 2025
Christian Dinco Primary December 2024 December 2025
Todd Rigby Primary December 2024 December 2025
Jocelyn Yow Alternate December 2024 December 2025
Clint Lorimore Primary December 2024 December 2025
Mike McMinn Primary December 2024 December 2025
Todd Rigby Primary December 2024 December 2025
Christian Dinco Primary December 2024 December 2025
Jocelyn Yow Primary December 2024 December 2025
Mike McMinn Primary December 2024 December 2025
Todd Rigby Primary December 2024 December 2025
Christian Dinco Primary December 2024 December 2025
E-Commerce Online Sales and Use
Tax Ad-Hoc Committee
This sub-committee does not have a regular
meeting date.

Police Sub-Station/3rd Fire Station Ad-
Hoc Committee
This committee does not have a regular meeting
date.

Eastvale Community Services Ad-Hoc
Committee
This committee does not have a regular meeting
date.

Eastvale Legislative Ad-Hoc
Committee
This committee does not have a regular meeting
date.

Business and Development Success
Ad-Hoc Committee
This sub-committee does not have a regular
meeting date.

Eastvale Schools Committee This committee does not have a regular meeting date.

CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS PositionCouncil/Commission
Appointment
CITY OF EASTVALE – MADDY ACT APPOINTMENT LIST
UPDATED: December 2024
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: In compliance with the requirements of the Government Code Section 54972, the Maddy Act Local Appointment List is posted on or before December 31 each year. It shows the current members of City Commissions, City Council Committee Appointments, and the terms of office. The names on the list are subject to change based on vacancies, expiring terms, and resignations that occur during the year. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (951) 703-4420 if you would like further information regarding the appointments.

Date
Appointed/Reaffirmed Term Expires Meeting Schedules
Eastvale Finance Committee Meets quarterly on the third Tuesday of the month at 4:30PM
493

Eastvale City CouncilJune 11, 2025

Eastvale City Council
June 11, 2025