Eastvale City Council
August 13, 2025

offspring thereof, if such offspring are being kept, fed or maintained solely for sale, marketing, or slaughtering at the earliest practical age of maturity. In all cases the permissible number of animals per acre shall be computed upon the basis of the nearest equivalent ratio.

Group home means shared living quarters without separate kitchen and/or bathroom facilities for each room or unit. This classification includes residential hotels, dormitories, fraternities, sororities, convents, rectories and private residential clubs but does not include living quarters shared exclusively by a family. This category includes boardinghouses, which are defined as a building other than a hotel or restaurant where meals or lodging or both meals and lodging are provided for compensation for four or more persons.

Halfway house means a rehabilitation center for the treatment, counseling, rooming and boarding of persons released from jail, prisons, hospitals and sanitariums.

Hardware and home improvement centers means a hardware and home improvement center, including not more than 1,000 square feet of outside storage lumber.

Hazardous waste facility means a hazardous waste facility provided a hazardous waste facility siting permit.

Height, building. See section 120.05.010(c), height measurement.

Highway means roads, streets, boulevards, lanes, courts, places, commons, trails, ways or other rights-ofway or easements used for or laid out and intended for the public passage of vehicles or persons.

Holiday display.
(1) The term "holiday display" means any display that is commonly associated with any local or religious holiday and erected on a temporary basis, including but not limited to: Christmas lights and other decorations, Halloween decorations, or similar items, etc. (2) The term "holiday display" does not include any patriotic display such as a flag or ribbon.

Home occupation means an accessory, nonresidential business activity that is conducted within a dwelling by its inhabitants, incidental to the residential use of the dwelling, which does not change the character of the surrounding area by generating more traffic, noise, or storage of material than would be normally associated with a residential zone.

Hotel means a building designed for or occupied as the more or less temporary abiding place of individuals who are lodged with or without meals, in which there are six or more guest rooms, and in which no provision is made for cooking in any individual room or suite. Jails, hospitals, asylums, sanitariums, orphanages, prisons, detention homes or similar buildings where human beings are housed and detained under legal restraint are specifically not included.

Hotel, resort, means a hotel, including all accessory buildings defined as "hotel" in this title and having a building site or hotel grounds of not less than 50,000 square feet. Such hotel may have accessory commercial uses operated primarily for the convenience of the guests thereof, provided there is no street entrance directly to such commercial uses, and further provided such commercial uses shall not occupy more than 20 percent of the ground floor area of such hotel building.

Illegal sign means any of the following:
(1) A sign and related structures erected without first complying with all applicable city ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of its construction, erection or use; (2) A sign and related structures which do not comply with this title; (3) A sign and related structures which are a danger to the public or are unsafe.

Indoor amusement/entertainment facility means establishments providing indoor amusement and entertainment services as primary uses for a fee or admission charge, including dance halls, ballrooms and 839
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

electronic game arcades. Any establishment with four or more electronic games or coin-operated amusements, or premises where 50 percent or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an electronic game arcade as described in this definition; three or fewer machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site.

Indoor fitness and sports facility means predominantly participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building. Typical uses include bowling alleys, billiard parlors, ice/roller skating rinks, indoor racquetball courts, indoor climbing facilities, soccer areas, athletic clubs and health clubs.

Junkyards, wrecking, dismantling and salvage yards means the use of any lot or parcel of land for outside storage, wrecking, dismantling or salvage of any used or secondhand materials, including but not limited to lumber, auto parts, household appliances, pipe, drums, machinery or furniture. A proposed or intended use by the owner of the used or secondhand materials does not constitute an exception to this definition.

Kennel means any building, structure, enclosure or premises whereupon or within which five or more dogs, four months of age or older, are kept or maintained. (See section 120.04.070, kennels and catteries.) (1) Class I kennel means any building, structure, enclosure, or premises whereupon or within which five to ten dogs, four months or older of age, are kept or maintained. A class I kennel shall not include a sentry dog kennel or an animal rescue operation that meets the definition and requirements set forth in section 120.04.070.
(2) Class II kennel means any building, structure, enclosure, or premise, whereupon or within which eleven to 25 dogs, four months of age or older, or cattery (10 to 25 cats) are kept or maintained. A class II kennel shall not include a sentry dog kennel.
(3) Class III kennel means 26 to 40 dogs or a cattery (26 to 40 cats). (4) Class IV kennel means 41 or more dogs, or a sentry dog kennel or a cattery (41 or more cats). (5) Sentry dog kennel means any building, structure, enclosure, or premises whereupon or within which five or more guard or sentry dogs are kept or maintained. A sentry dog is any dog trained to work without supervision in a fenced facility and to deter or detain unauthorized persons found within the facility. The term "guard dog" also means a sentry dog.

Kitchen means any room in a building or dwelling unit which is used for cooking or preparation of food.

Labor camp means any building or group of buildings where five or more farm employees are housed.

Lake, recreational, means a confined body of standing fresh water containing more than 500,000 gallons of water and covering more than one acre of surface area, not including reservoirs, duck clubs, bodies of water contained within golf courses, and water storage used only for agricultural or domestic purposes.

Leasable floor area, net, means the area including sales areas and integral stock areas, but excluding corridors, enclosed malls, lobbies, stairwells, elevators, equipment rooms and restrooms.

Liquid petroleum service stations means stations with or without the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption, provided that if storage tanks are above ground, the total capacity of all tanks shall not exceed 10,000 gallons. Storage tanks shall be painted a neutral color and shall not have any advertising painted or placed on their surface.

Lot means parcel of real property:
(1) Shown as a delineated parcel of land with a separate and distinct number or other designation of a plot recorded in the office of the county recorder;
(2) Not so delineated and containing not less than 7,200 square feet and abutting on a street or alley and held under separate ownership from adjacent property prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this title is derived; or
840
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

(3) Not so delineated containing not less than 7,200 square feet abutting on a street or alley, if the same was a portion of a larger piece of real property held under the same ownership prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this title is derived.

A lot shall not come into existence solely because it is described as a parcel of real property securing, or in part securing, a promise to pay money or other thing of value whether its title is held by a trustee for such purpose or not.

Lot area means the total horizontal area within the lot lines of a lot.

Lot, corner, means a lot located at the junction of two or more intersecting streets having an angle of intersection of not more than 135 degrees, with a boundary line thereof bordering on two of the streets.

Figure 6-2. Corner Lot
Lot, flag, means a parcel of land shaped like a flag. The staff (access corridor) is a narrow strip of land providing vehicular and pedestrian access to the street with the bulk of the property lying to the rear of other lots.

Figure 6-3. Flag Lot
841
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

Lot, interior, means a lot other than a corner lot.

Figure 6-4. Interior Lot
Lot lines means the boundary lines of lots and as follows:
(1) Front lot line. The line dividing a lot from the street, or from a permanent access easement located on the same lot.
842
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

(2) Corner lot. Only one street line shall be considered as a front lot line, and such front lot line shall be determined by the commission.
(3) Rear lot line. The line opposite the front lot line. (4) Side lot lines. Any lot lines other than the front lot line or the rear lot line.

Lot, through, means an interior lot having frontage of two parallel or approximately parallel streets.

Figure 6-5. Through Lot
Manufacturing, limited, means limited manufacturing, fabricating, processing, packaging, treating and incidental storage related thereto, provided any such activity shall be in the same line of merchandise or service as the trade or service business conducted on the premises.

Manufacturing, major, means manufacturing, fabrication, processing, and assembly of materials in a raw form. Uses in this category typically create greater than usual amounts of smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound or other objectionable influences that might be obnoxious to persons conducting business on site or on an adjacent site.

Uses include but are not limited to batch plants, rendering plants, aggregate processing facilities, plastics and rubber products manufacturing.

Manufacturing, minor, means manufacturing, fabrication, processing and assembly of materials from parts that are already in processed form and that, in their maintenance, assembly, manufacture, or plant operation, do not create excessive amounts of smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound or other objectionable influences that might be obnoxious to persons conducting business on site or on an adjacent site. Uses include, but are not limited to furniture manufacturing and cabinet shops, laundry and dry cleaning plants, metal products fabrication and food and beverage manufacturing.

Mass transit means publicly provided transportation, usually either by bus or rail, to users at a fixed cost per ride.

Maximum height means the highest point of the structure or sign measured from the average natural ground level at the base of the supporting structure.

Menagerie means:
(1) Any lot or premises on which one or more wild animals of the following types are kept:
843
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

a. Venomous reptiles;
b. Nonvenomous reptiles that weigh more than ten pounds, not including turtles or tortoises; c. Birds or members of the Aves class that weigh more than 20 pounds, not including poultry; d. Mammals that weigh more than 20 pounds.
(2) Any lot or premises on which wild animals of the following types are kept, regardless of weight, unless such animals are listed in a zone classification as a permitted use:
a. Ten or more nonvenomous reptiles;
b. 25 or more mammals.
(3) A wild animal that has been tamed or trained shall be considered a wild animal. As used in this chapter, the term "wild animal" means any animal of the class Aves (birds), class Mammalia (mammals), class Amphibia (frogs, toads, salamanders), class Osteichtyes (bony fishes), class Crustacea (crayfish) or class Gastropoda (slugs, snails) which are not normally domesticated in this state as determined by the state fish and game commission.

Migrant agricultural worker means an itinerant agricultural worker that travels from place to place for employment in the planting, growing and harvesting of seasonal crops.

Mining operation means any process by which one or more substances classified geologically as minerals are extracted from the earth or stockpiled, including the reworking of mineral dumps which have been artificially created by mining operations.

Mobile recycling unit means a licensed vehicle used for the collection of recyclable materials. The term "mobile recycling unit" may also include trailers, bins, boxes or other storage containers which are transported by vehicles, and does not occupy more than five parking spaces or 500 square feet of floor area.

Mobilehome park means any area or tract of land where one or more mobilehome lots are rented or leased or held out for rent or lease to accommodate mobilehomes used for human habitation.

Mulch means a material such as leaves, bark or straw left loose and applied to the soils surface to prevent evaporation of water.

Noise attenuation barrier means a soundwall or other structure built by the state department of transportation to reduce noise impacts.

Noncommercial structure or sign means any sign that does not do any of the following:
(1) Advertise a product or service for profit or for a business purpose; (2) Propose a commercial transaction; or
(3) Relate solely to economic interests.

Nonconforming building means a building that was legal when established, but because of the adoption or amendment of the ordinance from which this title is derived conflicts with the provisions of this title applicable to the district in which such a building is situated.

Nonconforming use means the use of a building or land that was legal when established, but because of the adoption or amendment of this code conflicts with the provisions of this code applicable to the district in which such use is located.

Nonprofit clubs means nonprofit community centers, social halls, churches, parks, and community recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools, and golf courses and the normal accessory uses thereto. 844
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

Occupancy, change of means a discontinuance of an existing use, and substitution thereof, of a use of a different kind or class.

Occupied means used, arranged, converted to, rented, leased, or intended to be occupied.

Outdoor commercial recreation means facility for various outdoor participant sports and types of recreation where a fee is charged for use (e.g., amphitheaters, amusement and theme parks, golf driving ranges, health and athletic clubs with outdoor facilities, miniature golf courses, skateboard parks, stadiums and coliseums, swim and tennis clubs, water slides, and zoos).

Outdoor film studios means a facility utilizing on-site indoor and outdoor locations for the filming of motion pictures, television programs, and music videos. Outdoor film studios may provide limited housing for temporary use during such filming operations. This definition does not include permanent production facilities such as would be used for film processing or editing, although sound recording or dubbing shall be allowed.

Outdoor lighting means outside illuminating devices that are electrically powered and used to light yards, building façades, patios, balconies, building overhangs, open canopies, parking sheds, landscaping, walkways, and driveways.

Outdoor storage means any outside storage of material including but not limited to: lumber, auto parts, appliances, pipe, drums, machinery, furniture, building materials, work tools, or other items or substances. Items stored under a carport, awning, or patio shall be considered outside storage.

Overlay zone means a set of zoning requirements that are superimposed upon an underlying zone. Overlay zones are generally used when a particular area requires special protection or has a special neighborhood concern.

Development of land subject to overlay zoning requires compliance with the regulations of both the underlying zone and overlay zone.

Parking area means any area for the parking of a motor vehicle, plus those additional areas required to provide ingress to and egress from the parking area.

Patio cover means a structure attached to the main building and fully unenclosed on all sides except the side which is the main building or detached from the main building and fully unenclosed on all sides. The roof of the patio cover may be fully or partially enclosed. The unenclosed sides of the patio cover structure must remain unenclosed and shall not be covered with any permanent or semi-permanent material including, but not limited to, insect screening, transparent plastic, or lattice.

Pen-fed beef cattle operations means six or more beef cattle per acre being fed or fattened for marketing purposes whether the owner or operator performs the feeding service for himself or others. (Dairy herd replacements are not considered beef cattle.)
Person includes association, company, firm, corporation, partnership, co-partnership or joint venture.

Place of public assembly means any place designed or used for congregation or gather of 20 or more persons in one room where such gathering is of a public nature. Assembly hall, church, auditorium, recreational hall, pavilion, place of amusement, dance hall, opera house, motion picture theater, outdoor theater or theater are included within this term.

Planned commercial development means a development that may be permitted to have reduced width, depth, and building setback requirements, and have common access and common parking, provided a planned development land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of title 130, subdivisions.

Planned industrial development means a development that may be permitted to have reduced lot area, width, depth, and building setback requirements, and have common access and common parking, provided a planned development land division is approved pursuant to the provisions of title 130, subdivisions.

Planned residential development means a residential development including, but not limited to, statutory and nonstatutory condominiums, cluster housing, townhouses, community apartment projects and mobilehome 845
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

developments; that is permitted to have reduced lot area, width and depth requirements, and building setback requirements by integrating into the overall development open space and outdoor recreational facilities; and may include recreational and public buildings intended primarily for the use of the residents of the project within the development.

Poultry means domestic birds including turkeys, ducks, geese, pheasants, and other fowl specialized for meat projects, egg laying or ornamental show, but not including crowing fowl as defined in this title.

Professional offices means administrative and professional offices including medical, dental, chiropractic, law offices, architectural, engineering, community planning, and real estate, provided there is no outdoor storage of materials, equipment, or vehicles, other than passenger cars.

Property, private, means land or belongings owned by a person or group and kept for their exclusive use.

Property, public, means property owned by a government agency.

Public recreation means public parks and public playgrounds, golf courses with standard length fairways and city clubs.

Public schools means public educational institutions such as community colleges, universities, elementary, middle/junior high and high schools, and military academies.

Rain shutoff device means a device that senses rainfall and automatically shuts off the irrigation system.

Ranch, guest, means any property containing five acres or more operated as a ranch which offers guestrooms for rent and has outdoor recreational activities such as horseback riding, swimming or hiking.

Recreational equipment means any equipment used for sports, exercise, leisure, and recreation including but not limited to basketball hoops, slides, swings, jungle gyms, volleyball nets, grills, portable barbeques, fire pits and outdoor heaters.

Recreational trailer means a motor home, travel trailer, truck camper or camping trailer, with or without motive power, designed for human habitation for recreational, emergency, or other occupancy. The term "dependent recreational vehicle" means a recreational vehicle not equipped with a toilet for sewage disposal. The term "independent recreational vehicle" means a recreational vehicle equipped with a toilet for sewage disposal.

Recreational vehicle park means any area or tract of land, or a separately designated section within a mobilehome park, where one or more spaces are rented or leased or held out for rent or lease to owners or users of recreational vehicles. A recreational vehicle park may have a membership organization that provides for the use of spaces within a park:
(1) Vacation recreational vehicle parks means a park designed for transient use, such as overnight or shortterm occupancy. Generally, only limited services and amenities are provided. (2) Extended occupancy parks means a recreational vehicle park designed for extended occupancy. (3) Permanent occupancy parks means a recreational vehicle park designed for permanent occupancy. Full urban services and recreational amenities are provided.

Recreational vehicles means vehicles with or without motive power, designed for human habitation or recreation, including but not limited to: boats, snowmobiles, watercraft, racing vehicles, off-road vehicles, utility trailers, motor homes, travel trailers, truck campers or camping trailers.

Recyclable materials.
(1) The term "recyclable materials" means any reusable material acceptable for reprocessing and redemption including, but not limited to, glass, metal, paper, and plastic. (2) The term "recyclable materials" does not include hazardous waste or other refuse. 846
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

Recycling collection facility means a facility that accepts recyclable material by donation, redemption, or purchase; and where the use of power-driven machinery is limited to that which is necessary for the temporary storage, efficient transfer and securing of materials, as set forth in section 120.04.110.

Recycling facility means a facility equipped to accept and/or process recyclable materials. The term "recycling facility" includes, but is not limited to, reverse vending machines, collection facilities and processing facilities.

Recycling processing facility means a facility that collects and processes acceptable recyclable materials by donation, redemption or purchase. The term "processing" means the preparation or transformation of recyclable materials for efficient shipment to an end user by, but not limited to, such means as baling, compacting, crushing, shredding and sorting.

Religious institution means churches, temples and other places of religious worship.

Retail sales and service, small scale, means establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, clothing rental, dry cleaning pick-up stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats (self-service laundries), shoe repair shops, and tailors. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided, spas and hot tubs for rent, and tanning salons.

Reverse vending machine means an automated and mechanical recycling facility, not more than 50 square feet in floor area, which accepts one or more types of beverage containers made typically of glass, metal or plastic, and issues in return a cash refund or redeemable credit receipt with a value not less than the redemption worth of the container as determined by the state.

Scenic highway means any officially designated state or city scenic highway.

Sex-oriented business. See chapter 6.44, sex-oriented businesses.

Shopping center means a parcel of land not less than three acres in size, on which there exists four or more separate business uses that have mutual parking facilities.

Sidewalk means any right-of-way designed for the use by pedestrians and not intended for use by motor vehicles of any kind. A sidewalk may be located within or without a street right-of-way, at grade or at a grade separated from vehicular traffic.

Sign means a sign used for outdoor advertising purposes as defined and directional as provided in this Code.

Sign structure means any structure defined as follows:
(1) For a freestanding sign or a sign that projects from another structure, the sign structure shall be a physical structure upon which letters or symbols are placed; (2) For a sign placed parallel to the surface or a building, the sign structure shall consist of all elements placed directly upon the building, including individually mounted letters.

Significant resources means any city, county, state or federal site which has significant or potentially significant social, cultural, historical, archaeological, recreational, or scenic resources, or which plays or potentially could play a significant role in promoting tourism. For the purposes of this Code, the term "significant" includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(1) Scenic highways;
(2) A corridor 500 feet in width adjacent to both sides of all highways within three-tenths of a mile of any regional, state or federal park or recreation area.
847
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

Single-room occupancy (SRO) unit means multiunit housing for very low income persons that typically consists of a single room and shared bath and also may include a shared common kitchen and common activity area. SROs may be restricted to seniors or be available to persons of all ages.

Soil moisture-sensing device means a device that measures the amount of water in the soil.

Stable, commercial, means a stable for horses which are let, hired, used or boarded on a commercial basis and for compensation.

Story means the portion of a building included between the surface of any floor and the finished ceiling next above it or the finished undersurface of the roof directly over that particular floor.

Street means a public or an approved private thoroughfare or road easement which affords the principal means of legal vehicular access to abutting property.

Street line means the boundary line between a street and abutting property.

Structural alteration means any change in the supporting members of a building or structure, such as bearing walls, columns, beams, girders, floor joists or roof joists.

Structure means anything constructed or erected and the use of which requires more or less permanent location on the ground or attachment to something having a permanent location on the ground, such as awnings and patio covers, but not including walls and fences six feet or less in height.

Supportive housing means housing with no limit on length of stay, occupied by the target population and linked to on-site or off-site services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his health status, and maximizing his ability to live and, when possible, work in the community.

Swap meets means the use, rental, or lease of stalls or areas outside of an enclosed building by vendors offering goods or materials for sale or exchange, not including public fairs or art exhibits.

Temporary exterior display means any display commonly associated with any significant event for the household, and erected on a temporary basis, including but not limited to birthday, wedding, or any other party decoration.

Temporary real estate offices means temporary real estate offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and during the original sale of the subdivision, but not to exceed a period of two years in any event.

Trail bike park means an open area used by trail bikes or motorcycles, for purposes including but not limited to hill climbing, trail riding, scrambling, racing, and riding exhibitions.

Transitional housing and transitional housing development mean rental housing operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months.

Use means the purpose for which land or a building is arranged, designed, or intended, or for which either is or may be occupied or maintained.

Used includes occupied, arranged, designed for, or intended to be used.

Van pool means seven or more people traveling together on a continuing and prearranged basis in a motor vehicle designed for the transportation of persons over routes tailored to accommodate rider needs.

Variance allows the city to grant exceptions to the development standards of this Code under unique and limited circumstances.

Warehousing and distribution means businesses whose sole purpose is to store and then distribute goods for sale as opposed to businesses whose sole purpose is to move goods by truck. 848
Created: 2024-06-25 15:50:03 [EST]
(Supp. No. 13)

Wind energy conservation system (WECS) means a machine that converts the kinetic energy of the wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy. The WECS include all parts of the system except the tower and electrical transmission equipment.
(1) Accessory wind energy conservation system (accessory WECS) means a WECS with a rated output of 20 kilowatts or less and is an accessory use to the principal use of a lot in that at least 50 percent of the average annual power production is used on the lot.
(2) Commercial wind energy conservation system (commercial WECS) means any WECS which is not an accessory WECS as defined herein.

Yard means an open and unoccupied space that is unobstructed from the ground to the sky, on a lot upon which a building is situated.

Yard, front, means a yard extending across the full width of the lot between the side lot lines, and between the front lot line and either the nearest line of the main building or the nearest line of any enclosed or covered porch.

Yard, rear, means a yard extending across the full width of the lot between the side lot lines and measured between the rear lot line and the nearest rear line of the main building or the nearest line of any enclosed or covered porch. Where a rear yard abuts a street it shall meet front yard requirements of the district.

Yard, side, means a yard extending from the front yard to the rear yard between the side lot line and the nearest line of the main building, or of any accessory building attached thereto.

Zoning code means title 120 (this title), planning and zoning, of the Eastvale Municipal Code. (b) When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future tense; words in the singular number include the plural number and words in the plural number include the singular number.

The masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter gender. The term "shall" is always mandatory and not merely directory. The term "may" is permissive.
(Ord. of 7-2012, § 6.1; Ord. No. 2013-09, § 3, 5-22-2013; Ord. No. 23-21, § 1, 2-8-2023; Ord. No. 23-26, § 4, 1-10- 2024)
849
1 Exhibit ‘A’
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-__

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA TO AMEND OF SECTIONS 120.03.020, 120.03.030, 120.05.060, 120.06.010, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SECTION 120.04.170 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE MAKING CHANGES TO

LAND USES SUCH AS DRIVE-IN AND DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANTS,

CARWASHES, ELECTRIC VEHILCE CHARGING STATIONS, GASOLINE

SERVICE STATIONS, ALTERNATIVE FUELING STATIONS, TRUCK AND

TRAILER RENTAL AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND MINI-STORAGE

FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend the city’s regulations to establish development standards for drive-through and drive-in restaurant uses and establish updated zoning designations for carwashes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini-storage facilities to be located within the industrial and manufacturing zones. Additionally, the municipal code amendment includes updates to the zoning designations and glossary in relation to regulating electric vehicle charging stations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. As required by Section 120.01.070(e) of the Eastvale Municipal Code, the City Council finds that the changes contained in this ordinance are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs. Specifically, the purpose of this ordinance is to redesignate land uses such as carwashes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini-storage facilities to the industrial and manufacturing zones. The ordinance establishes development standards and glossary terms for drive-through and drive-in uses, and establishes updates to the zoning designations and glossary terms pertaining to the regulation of electric vehicle charging stations.

Additionally, technical changes were made to clarify the applicability of multi-family dwellings to be consistent with state requirements.

SECTION 2. Amendment of Section 120.03.020 (Residential and agricultural permitted uses and development standards). Table 3.2-1 in Section 120.03.020 (Use matrix for residential and agricultural zones) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to add “Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Small” and add footnote “2” to “Dwelling, Multiple Family” with the footnote description to read as:
850
2 Land Use A-1 A-2 RA RR R-1 R2 R-3 PRD R-5 R-6 R-T Special Provisions
Electric Vehicle
Charging Station,
Small
P P P P P P P P P P P Chapter
110.96
Dwelling,
Multiple Family 2

P P P P
1 Public schools are not regulated by this code.
2 Notwithstanding any provision of this code or any specific plan to the contrary, as required by Government Code Section 65583.2(h) multiple family dwellings shall be permitted by right on any site listed in the City’s Housing Element as available for the development of lower income housing if at least twenty percent of the proposed units are affordable to lower income households during the housing element planning period.

G Denotes a specific definition. Please see section 120.06, glossary.

SECTION 3. Amendment of Section 120.03.030 (Commercial and industrial permitted uses and development standards). Table 3.3-1 in Section 120.03.020 (Use matrix for commercial, business park, industrial, and special purpose zones) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to modify the rows for “Car and truck washes (with or without drive-through operation)”, “Gasoline service stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption”, “Gasoline service stations, with concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption”, “Mini-storage”, “Truck and Trailer Sales, Rental, and Storage”, addition of “Alternative Fueling Station such as but not limited to hydrogen, propane, biodiesel, etc. (with or without retail, rest stop facility, or office)”, “Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Small”, “Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Large”, and removal of “Car washes” to read as:

Land Use C-1/CP C-P-S C-O I-P M-SC M-M M-H W-1 Special Provisions
Alternative Fueling
Station such as but not
limited to hydrogen,
propane, biodiesel, etc.
(with or without retail,
rest stop facility, or
office)

C C C C
Car washes C
Car and truck washes
(with or without drivethrough operation)

P C C C P C P C
Electric Vehicle Charging
Station, Small
P P P P P P P Chapter
110.96
Electric Vehicle Charging
Station, Large
P P P P P P P Chapter
110.96
851
3 Gasoline service
stations, not including
the concurrent sale of
beer and wine for offpremises consumption

P P C C C P C P
Gasoline service
stations, with concurrent
sale of beer and wine for
off-premises
consumption

C C C C C C
Mini-storage C C C P C P C P Section
120.04.020
Truck and Trailer Sales,
and Rental, and Storage

C C P C P C P
SECTION 4. Establishment of Section 120.04.170 (Drive-in and drive-through uses). The Eastvale Municipal code is amended to establish Section 120.04.170 (Drive-in and drive-through uses) for the development standards and requirements for “Drive-in and drive-through uses” to read as:

Sec. 120.04.170. Drive-in and drive-through uses.
(a) Intent. The intent of this section is to do each of the following:
(1) Regulate drive-through businesses to ensure compatibility of such uses with surrounding uses and properties.
(2) Ensure that an adequate amount of space is allocated for on-site maneuvering and circulation.
(3) Ensure vehicles in a queue for service do not impede traffic on abutting streets and parking areas.
(4) Ensure that vehicle stacking lanes will not have nuisance impacts on neighboring properties and nearby residential uses.
(5) Establish development standards to mitigate the impacts of traffic, congestion, excessive pavement, litter, and noise while ensuring pedestrian connectivity is uninterrupted by vehicles.
(6) Ensure outdoor spaces are provided and preserved.
(b) Permitted zoning. Drive-in and drive-through facilities shall be allowed per chapter 120.03, zoning district regulations.
(c) Design and development standards.
(1) Required studies. The design of all drive-through lanes for any facility shall be subject to review and approval of a drive-through queuing analysis (or such other study as requested by the City Engineer or their designee) prepared by an independent traffic 852
4 engineer licensed by the State of California, and provided to the City by the developer, at such developer’s sole expense, at the time of application for such use. (2) Building placement and orientation.
a. The minimum net land area for uses with drive-through facilities is one (1) acre.

This minimum land area may be modified by the reviewing authority through the design review process when the drive-through facility is within a specific plan or an integrated shopping center.
b. Buildings shall be placed on the front yard or street side yard setback line and oriented so that the primary public entrance faces the street and so that any mechanical equipment or other supporting equipment are screened from the public view at grade and from higher buildings.
c. Outdoor dining and seating areas shall be located near the main pedestrian entrance.
d. Walk-up windows, if used, shall be located near outdoor dining areas or other pedestrian areas, to encourage accessibility and limit vehicle and pedestrian conflicts.
e. Buildings may be clustered to create a plaza or outdoor dining area between buildings.
f. Pedestrian pathways and sidewalks must provide safe and convenient access to the building, shall connect directly to the public right-of-way, and shall not cross driveways or stacking lanes to get to the building entrance. g. The drive-through lanes shall not be located between the property line and the front of the building.
h. Drive-through lanes shall be located to the side or rear of the building and shall be screened with a combination of decorative and split face low screen walls with capping and dense landscaping. The drive-through lanes may be designed to pass through an enclosed building element that is architecturally consistent and integrated into the building’s design so that the lanes are enclosed. i. Loading and service areas must be located on the site to minimize potential noise incompatibility with surrounding properties and so that, to the maximum extent feasible, they are not visible from the rights -of-way. j. Future drive-through facilities proposed in a master plan or shopping center shall be identified early in the review process to avoid retrofitting the site at a later date.
853
5 Figure 4.17-1. Drive-Through Design
(3) Building entrances.
a. Primary building entrances and entry features shall be clearly defined through variation of architectural planes on the building and pavement surfaces, and must be accessible from a courtyard or plaza.
b. The primary building entries shall be accessed directly from the sidewalk in the public right-of-way or from within the development site. Pedestrian circulation paths may only intersect or cross a drive-through lane(s) if the applicant can demonstrate that there are no other feasible or practical options available, in which case the pedestrian crossing shall be raised to create a hump to enhance pedestrian safety.
(4) Building architecture and articulation.
a. Prominent architectural features shall be located near corners, intersections, or where visible to the public right-of-way to promote and enhance the primary building entrance.
854
6 b. Drive-through facilities within an integrated shopping center or master plan must have an architectural style consistent with the theme established in the center. c. The architecture of drive-through facilities must be compatible and consistent with surrounding uses in form, materials, colors, scale, etc. d. Building planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building. e. Articulation of building surfaces shall be encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns.
f. For the purposes of screening, mechanical and/or electrical equipment, when feasible shall be integrated into the architecture and design of the proposed building.
(5) Outdoor dining areas for restaurants.
a. Outdoor dining areas are required for all new drive-in and drive-through restaurant facilities.
b. Outdoor dining areas shall be designed as an integral part of the drive-through facility, and can include plazas, arcades, colonnades, or courtyards. c. Outdoor dining areas and other publicly accessible outdoor spaces shall include tables and seating, trash cans, and structures that provide shade and protection from the weather.
d. To the maximum extent feasible, outdoor dining areas shall be oriented for maximum benefit of sunlight and views and to the extent possible, outdoor dining areas shall be oriented away from drive-through stacking lanes. e. The minimum dimension of an outdoor dining area shall be 20 feet measured in any direction with a minimum area of 450 square feet.
(6) Parking and Circulation
a. Parking. The parking for drive-through facilities shall be determined according to Sec. 120.05.060. - Off-street vehicle parking.
b. Setbacks. Parking and the drive-through lane(s) shall be set back a minimum of 45 feet from the curb face of a public street. Greater setbacks may be required as mentioned in an applicable specific plan or as deemed necessary during the design review process.
(7) Stacking requirements.
a. Drive-through lanes shall be designed to accommodate adequate vehicle stacking as determined by a drive-through queuing analysis, reviewed by the City Engineer or their designee, that shall be based on the number of vehicles in the drive-through lanes for seven (7) consecutive days during peak lunch hours 855
7 between 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and peak dinner hours between 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at three (3) different locations in cities with a similar population as Eastvale and in a similar location as the proposed site. At the request of the City Engineer or their designee, additional information may be requested to ensure a complete and accurate evaluation of the drive-through design. b. All stacking must be designed to be accommodated on the site of the drivethrough use without impacting or causing obstructions to adjacent tenants, drive-aisles, parking spaces, or public or private streets. c. In the event that the number of vehicles waiting at the service window or kiosk exceeds the length of the stacking lane(s), personnel from the drive-through establishment shall manage the queue to ensure that all vehicles do not block or interfere with on-site vehicular and pedestrian circulation and parking areas. d. Drive-Through Lane Design
i. The entrance and exit of a drive-through lane must be at least 50 feet from an intersection of public rights-of-way when measured at the closest intersecting curbs.
ii. The drive-through lane must be at least 10 feet wide with a minimum 10- foot interior radius at curves.
iii. At a minimum, food and beverage drive-through businesses shall provide stacking space for at least six (6) vehicles before the order menu board, and other service-oriented drive-through businesses shall provide stacking space for at least six (6) vehicles before the drive-up window or kiosk.
iv. The drive-through lanes shall be separate from the circulation route necessary for ingress and egress from the property or access to any parking spaces within the site using concrete curbing or paint striping on at least one side of the lane. These requirements do not apply to the reuse of existing properties.
v. All stacking lanes must be clearly identified with pavement markings and signage to indicate the entrance, direction of traffic flow and exit. vi. At the discretion of the approving authority, the driveway-through lane design may be required to provide for a minimum nine (9) feet wide escape/emergency lane allowing motorists to exit the stacking lane before reaching the drive-through window.
(8) Performance Standards
a. The use shall be operated in a manner that does not interfere with the normal use of adjoining properties. If, in the opinion of the Community Development Director or their designee, the provisions of this paragraph are being violated, the violations shall be grounds for reopening conditional use permit hearings and adding conditions to control the violation. Performance standards include, but are not limited to, the following considerations, which, where appropriate, shall be incorporated as conditions of approval in all use permits as determined by the approving body:
i. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
856
8 ii. No undesirable odors shall be generated on the site. iii. Noise levels measured at the property line shall not exceed the level of background noise normally found in the area or as required per Chapter

8.52. – Noise regulation.
iv. All exterior lighting shall be contained to the subject property and shall not encroach onto neighboring properties as consistent with Sec. 120.05.050. – Outdoor lighting.
v. A traffic management plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. This plan shall include detailed information and mitigation measures (such as traffic control measures, tablets, online orders, temporary drive-through closures, and/or use of off-duty officers for traffic control) to ensure visitor vehicles shall remain completely on-site and shall not impede any public rights-of-way (streets, drives, walks, etc.), drive aisles, parking spaces, etc. This plan shall be kept onsite and made available to the store manager from implementation as required.
(9) Additional permit findings.
a. In addition to the findings required for the granting of the applicable discretionary application, the following additional findings are required to be made by the approving body in approving a discretionary permit for a drivethrough business:
i. That the proposed amount of parking, circulation plan, and traffic management plan will provide adequate area for safe stacking and maneuvering of vehicles, and the site design will provide adequate buffering for the use from adjoining land uses:
ii. The proposed location of the drive-through facility will not result in adverse impacts upon the vicinity after giving consideration to a litter clean-up plan, the hours of operation, and the site plan; iii. The proposed location of the drive-through facility will not block existing drive aisles in shared parking areas;
iv. The proposed location of the drive-through facility will not interfere with and or impact on-site pedestrian access and circulation. v. The use will not substantially less the usability of adjacent or nearby commercially zoned property or commercial use by interfering with pedestrian traffic;
vi. That the use will not create increased traffic hazards to pedestrians; vii. That the site will be adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and to accommodate all yards, walls, parking, landscaping, and other required improvements; and
viii. That the use will not substantially lessen the usability and suitability of adjacent or nearby residentially zoned property for residential use.

SECTION 5. Amendment of Section 120.05.060. Section 120.05.060 (Off-street vehicle 857
9 parking) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to make clarifying changes to the stacking criteria of drive-throughs to read as follows:

Use Type Per Square Foot or Unit Per Employee
or Student
Other Criteria
Banks, savings and loans
and other financial
institutions*
1 space per 250 sq. ft.
gross floor area
Vehicle stacking for 6
vehicles prior to the driveup window or as required
by the queueing analysis.

Restaurants, drivethroughs, walk-ups, cafes,
lounges, bars and other
establishments for the
sale and consumption on
the premises of food and
beverages
1 space per 45 sq. ft. of
serving area
1 space per 2 employees Stacking for 6 vehicles
prior to the menu board
or as required by the
queueing analysis.

SECTION 6. Amendment of Section 120.06.010. Section 120.06.010 (Glossary of terms) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to add the definition for “Drive-in and drive-through operations or facilities”, “Electric vehicle charging station, small”, and “Electric vehicle charging station, large” to read as follows:

Drive-in and drive-through operations or facilities, means a business which includes dining services (such as but not limited to restaurants, coffee shops, or online food/beverage order pick-up) or other services (such as but not limited to banks, carwashes, pharmacies, or other pick-up operations) that are designed so that customers can be served while remaining in their vehicles in a dedicated queue lane.

Electric vehicle charging station, small means a station that is designed and operated as a use ancillary to the primary permitted use on the site (such as a single family residence, condominium, apartment, office building, commercial retail, parking lot, garage or structure) in order to deliver electricity to personal or commercial passenger vehicles and trucks owned or operated by individuals who either reside or work on the site or are guests on the site where the charging station is located.

Electric vehicle charging station, large means a station that is designed to charge personal passenger vehicles and trucks and/or commercial passenger vehicles and trucks which is open to the public, whether with or without the payment of fees, subscriptions or monetary charges for the service. A “large electric vehicle charging station” includes the electrical and mechanical equipment as defined in Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, and any subsequent amendments, that is necessary to delivery electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug-in electric vehicle. It does not include ancillary equipment and facilities that are not directly necessary for the charging of plug-in electric vehicles, including but not limited to, canopies (with or without solar panels), patronage resting facilities, commercial sales kiosks or buildings, public restrooms, family amenities or pet amenities. Such ancillary equipment and facilities are not subject to the expedited application and permitting requirements as referenced in Chapter 110.96, electric vehicle charging systems, but shall be subject to the applicable development review process as 858
10 referenced in Section 120.02.010, development review.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.

SECTION 7. City Clerk Action. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933(a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and pasting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633(c).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ___________, 2025. _______________________________________
Mike McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
_______________________________________ _______________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney Government Services Director/City Clerk
859
11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE)

I, Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-__, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the __ day of ________, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _________, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
Government Services Director/City Clerk
860

CITY OF EASTVALE
CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR PLN25-20033 LAND

USE MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Eastvale City Council will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, August 13, 2025, at 6:30 p.m. at Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers located at 12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752, to consider a City-initiated amendment to the Eastvale Municipal Code.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A City-initiated amendment to the Eastvale Municipal Code making technical changes to land uses such as drive-in and drive-through restaurants, carwashes, electric vehicle charging stations, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini-storage facilities to the following sections: Section 120.03.020 (Residential and agricultural permitted uses and development standards), Section 120.03.030 (Commercial and industrial permitted uses and development standards), Section 120.05.060 (Off-street vehicle parking), Section 120.06.010 (Glossary of terms), and the establishment of Section 120.04.170 (Drive-in and drive-through uses).

PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide.

ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed amendment is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the “State CEQA Guidelines”) because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not considered a “project,” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Any person may submit written comments prior to the public hearing or may appear in person before the City Council to be heard. Written comments may be mailed to the City of Eastvale Planning Division located at 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752 or via email to [email protected].

For the comments to be presented to the City Council at the meeting, all comments made in writing or via e-mail prior to the public hearing must be received by the City of Eastvale Planning Division no later than Wednesday, August 13, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. Oral and written comments may be submitted directly to the City Council at the public hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you raised at the public hearing as described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Eastvale City Council prior to or at the public hearing.

If you have any questions on the project, please contact Allen Lim, Senior Planner, at (951) 703-4461 or [email protected].
861

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority/Eastvale Parking Authority Meeting

CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY/EASTVALE PARKING

AUTHORITY BUSINESS
Agenda Item No. 13.1
February 26, 2025
Workshop on Land Use Types: Drive-Throughs, Car Washes, Fueling Sta7on, Storage Facili7es, and Truck/Trailer Rental and Storage
Prepared By:

Allen Lim, Senior Planner
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentaon and provide staff with direcon on potential future regulation of specific land use types.

Summary
In response to increasing developer interest in construcng new mini-storage facilies and autooriented uses such as car washes, drive-through food and drink establishments, gasoline service staons, alternave fueling staons, and truck and trailer sales, rental, and storage, the workshop aims to facilitate a discussion and receive input from the City Council to inform and guide a potenal amendment to Title 120 (Planning and Zoning) of the Eastvale Municipal Code. These potenal amendments will provide greater clarity to staff and the development community for future development throughout the City.

Background
Over the last several years as the City has connued to be built out, the Planning Commission and City Council have expressed the importance of carefully considering the highest and best use for the limited remaining vacant land within the City. Concurrently, there has been a growing number of requests to establish and operate mini-storage facilies and auto-oriented uses such as car washes, drive-through food and drink establishments, gasoline service staons, alternave fueling staons, 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
862
and truck and trailer sales, rental, and storage throughout the City. Due to the growing interest in these uses, staff is iniang a discussion to obtain feedback on how these land use types should be regulated.

On January 18 2023, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direcon on how to proceed with drive-through businesses. The Commission recommended that staff further pursue an approach to modify condional use permit findings to ensure land use compability with exisng shopping centers and/or their surrounding area of the proposed drivethrough.

On September 18, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direcon on how to proceed with drive-throughs, carwashes, gasoline staons, alternave fueling staons, mini-storage facilies, and truck and trailer rental and storage facilies.

The Commission advised staff to conduct a more in-depth analysis, taking into account the available vacant developable land within the City, the suitability of the proposed land uses within current zoning designaons, and the potenal for implemenng alternave regulaons through enhanced design and development standards.

On October 16, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission with updated informaon, exhibits, and various redline changes to the Zoning Code based on the input received by the Planning Commission from the September 18, 2024 discussion. The Commission was generally supporve of the changes and provided further direcon to update the code based on the examples presented.

As an implementation item of the recently adopted Eastvale 2040 General Plan, staff is working on a comprehensive Zoning Code update for consideraon by the Planning Commission. Input received from the workshop will be used to inform the Zoning Code update. If warranted, staff may bring a focused Zoning Code Amendment to address the more crical uses prior to the comprehensive update.

Staff has included details on the number of exisng locaons of each use within the City to aid in the discussion.

Analysis
Analysis – Car Washes
Pursuant to Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, Car and Truck washes are permi=ed by right within the C-1/C-P (General Commercial), M-SC (Manufacturing- Service Commercial), and M-M (ManufacturingMedium) Zones, condionally permi=ed within the C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) Zone and prohibited in all remaining zones. Addionally, Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones allows drive-in or drive-through operaons or facilies (any use) as a condionally permi=ed use in the following zones: C-1/C-P (General Commercial), CP-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), and I-P (Industrial Park). As a result of drive-in and drive-through uses being condionally permi=ed, staff has historically processed a Condional Use Permit along with a Development Review applicaon for each proposed car wash project despite the fact that the use itself is permitted within select zones.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
863
Each of the sites that staff has received inquiries about in recent months has been located in the C1/C-P (General Commercial) Zone and has been either an infill pad within an exisng or proposed shopping center.

To determine the exisng condions, staff examined the supply of exisng and/or approved carwash locaons within the City of Eastvale and found the following as shown in Table 1 - Exis7ng Conditions for Carwashes.

Table 1 - Existing Conditions for Car Washes
Name Location Type Status
Chevron 12515 Riverside Dr. Gasoline Service Station Operational Chevron 12464 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational 7-Eleven 6291 Archibald Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Quick Quack 5116 Hamner Ave. Express Operational
Beyond Mart 14997 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Approved All American Express 7075 Hamner Ave. Express Approved
Quick Quack 7779 Archibald Ave. Express Approved
Mister Car Wash 6280 Archibald Ave. Express Approved
Analysis – Drive-Throughs
Pursuant to Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, Drive-in or drive-through operaons or facilies (any use) are condionally permi=ed within the C-1/C-P (General Commercial), C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), and I-P (Industrial Park) Zones. As a result of drive-in and drive-through uses being condionally permi=ed, staff has historically processed a Condional Use Permit along with a Development Review applicaon for each proposed project. To ensure a drive through will not operate in a manner that would be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the City, staff evaluates the ancipated vehicle queueing at peak demand hours, driveway lengths, screening, as well as the locaon of menu boards related to vehicle stacking and the surrounding uses.

To determine the exisng condions, staff examined the supply of exisng and/or approved drivethroughs within the City of Eastvale and included the findings in Attachment 1 and 2. In summary, at the me of preparing this report, there are a total of forty-four (44) drive-through facilies throughout the City. Of the forty-four (44) drive-through facilies, a total of thirty-three (33) are operaonal, seven (7) are approved by the Planning Commission or City Council but not yet constructed, and four (4) are acvely under construcon. A further breakdown of drive-throughs by type can be found below in Table 2 – Existing Conditions for Drive-Throughs.

Table 2 - Existing Conditions for Drive-Throughs
Type of Drive-Through Quantity
Food 17
Carwash 8
Coffee 7
Bank/ATM 7
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
864
Pharmacy 3
To Be Determined* 2
Total Existing: 44
*Planning Entlement PLN12-0051 Eastvale Crossings (Walmart) approved by City Council on April 12, 2017, pre-approved two (2) drive-through condional use permits. At this me the type of drive-throughs proposed that are currently under staff review are a 4,375 sf McDonald’s (Restaurant) and a 1,770 sf Better Buzz (Coffee Shop).

Analysis – Mini-Storage Facilities
Pursuant to Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, Mini-storage facilies are permi=ed by right within the M-SC (Manufacturing – Service Commercial), M-M (Manufacturing – Medium), and M-H (ManufacturingHeavy) Zones, condionally permi=ed within the C-1/C-P (General Commercial) and I-P (Industrial Park) Zones, and prohibited in all remaining zones.

To determine the exisng condions, staff examined the supply of exisng and/or approved ministorage facilies within the City of Eastvale and included the findings in A@achment 3. In summary, at the me of preparing this report, there are a total of two (2) operaonal facilies. A further breakdown of the mini-storage facilies can be found below in Table 3 – Exis7ng Condi7ons for Mini-Storage Facilities.

Table 3 - Existing Conditions for Mini-Storage Facilities Name Location Type Status
Public Storage 6301 Archibald Ave. Mini-Storage Operational Eastvale Storage 14555 Chandler St. Mini-Storage Operational Analysis – Gasoline Service Stations
Pursuant to Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, Gasoline service staons, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumpon are permi=ed by right within the C-1/C-P (General Commercial), C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), M-M (Manufacturing –Medium) and M-H (Manufacturing – Heavy) Zones, condionally permi=ed within the I-P (Industrial Park) Zone, and prohibited in all remaining zones.

Further, pursuant to Table 3.3-1, Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones, Gasoline service staons, with concurrent sale of beer and wine are only conditionally permitted in the C-1/C-P (General Commercial), C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial), I-P (Industrial Park), and M-SC (Manufacturing – Service Commercial) Zones, while prohibited in remaining zones.

To determine the existing conditions, staff examined the supply of existing and/or approved gasoline service staons within the City of Eastvale and included the findings in A@achment 4. In summary, at the me of preparing this report, there are a total of nine (9) gasoline service staons in operaon and two (2) approved but not constructed. A further breakdown of the gasoline service stations can be found below in Table 4 – Existing Conditions for Gasoline Service Facilities.

Table 4 - Existing Conditions for Gasoline Service Stations 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
865
Name Location Type Status
Chevron Extra Mile 12515 Riverside Dr. Gasoline Service Station Operational Costco Gas 5030 Hamner Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Vons 6110 Hamner Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Chevron Extra Mile 12464 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Ralph’s 12618 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Chevron Extra Mile 6078 Archibald Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational 7-Eleven 6291 Archibald Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational 7-Eleven 7014 Archibald Ave. Gasoline Service Station Operational Chevron 7-Eleven 12578 Schleisman Rd. Gasoline Service Station Operational Walmart Gas 13980 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Approved Beyond Mart 14997 Limonite Ave. Gasoline Service Station Approved Analysis - Alternative Fueling Stations
As for alternave fueling staons such as electric truck charging staons and hydrogen fuel staons, the Eastvale Zoning Code does not specify these uses within Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones. Although there has been an increased interest in alternave fueling staons, there are currently no reportable locaons within the City, with the exception of electric vehicle charging parking spaces within shopping centers throughout the City.

Analysis - Truck and Trailer Sales, Rental and Storage
Pursuant to Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, Truck and Trailer Sales and Rental, are permi=ed by right within the M-SC (Manufacturing – Service Commercial), M-M (Manufacturing – Medium), and M-H (Manufacturing -Heavy) Zones and prohibited in all remaining zones.

Further Table 3.3-1 Use Matrix for Commercial, Business Park, Industrial, and Special Purpose Zones of the Eastvale Zoning Code, as currently adopted, does not specifically idenfy truck storage as a permi=ed or condionally permi=ed use. Pursuant to Table 3.3-1, a similar use that may be considered truck storage, for the purpose of an interpretaon, although unclear, would be a contractor storage yard which is permi=ed by right in the M-SC (Manufacturing – Service Commercial), M-M (Manufacturing – Medium), and M-H (Manufacturing Heavy) Zones and prohibited in all remaining zones. Although there has been an increased interest in truck and trailer sales, rental, and storage, there are currently no reportable standalone locations within the City.

Location Discussion
Currently, there are thirteen (13) designated commercial centers throughout the City. Attachment 5 idenfies the exisng shopping centers within the City and their associated acreage, type, and intended walkability. Of the thirteen commercial centers, there are five large shopping centers, five neighborhood centers, and two local centers in addion to the proposed downtown lifestyle center.

Three of the centers are intended to be pedestrian-oriented centers that offer a variety of retail and dining opons and feature enhanced landscaping, a=racve walkways, and other outdoor amenies. These centers include Hamner Place, The Merge, and the future Downtown area. As part of the consideraon of the above described uses, the City Council may consider the appropriateness of some of the uses in the City's commercial centers, and in parcular the appropriateness of autorelated uses within the centers designed with a pedestrian focus. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
866
Planning Commission Feedback
On September 18, 2024 the Planning Commission provided the following comments with regard to each of the uses:

Carwashes:

Limit new carwashes to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Look at existing specific plans to determine appropriateness.

Drive-throughs:

Maintain development standards and permitted locations with a CUP.

Explore distance/separation requirements for discussion.

Identify locations of existing drive-throughs and illustrate possible distance radius scenarios.

Explore enhanced design and development standards/requirements for new drive-throughs.

Mini-Storage Facilities:

Limit new mini-storage facilities to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Share results of market analysis prepared for The Ranch area.

Gasoline Service Stations:

Explore prohibing new gasoline service staons in commercial zones and limit to industrial and manufacturing zones.

There is a decreasing need in gasoline service staons with the growth of electric vehicle ownership and mandates.

Alternative Fuel Stations/EV Charging Stations:

Disnguish between light duty vehicle charging and heavy duty (truck) charging facilies and regulate differently in the code.

Require a CUP for new alternative fuel and EV charging stations.

Consider and address safety concerns due to the extended me necessary for electric vehicle charging.

Truck and Trailer Rental and Storage:

Limit new truck and trailer rental and storage facilities to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Require a CUP for new facilities.

Consider and address safety concerns due to the long-term parking and lack of people at facilities.

On October 16, 2024 the Planning Commission provided the following addional comments with regard to each of the uses:

Drive-throughs:
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
867
Connue exploring other agencies’ development standards for drive-through screening, outdoor dining, and pedestrian circulation.

Alternative Fuel Stations/EV Charging Stations:

Create new land uses which disnguishes light duty, medium duty, and heavy-duty electric vehicle charging facilities as consistent with state requirements.

Light duty charging facilies shall be permi=ed in every zone or as required by state requirements.

Have staff explore the feasibility of requiring DC fast charging for light duty vehicles in nonresidential zones.

Consider the requirement of allowing Level 2 charging and DC Fast charging for light duty facilities in park space and public facilities.

In general, the Planning Commission provided guidance to begin the process of amending the Zoning Code with regard to all of the uses discussed. Although the Commission expressed support for connuing to allow all of the uses and connuing to require condional use permits, there was a general consensus to limit new carwashes, mini-storage facilies, truck and trailer rental/storage facilies, and possibly gasoline service staons to be located strictly within industrial and manufacturing zones. The Commission was generally supporve of connuing to allow drivethroughs in the commercial, industrial, and manufacturing zones and also suggested adding electric vehicle charging staons for light duty passenger vehicles within the commercial and industrial zones. A@achment 9 includes the General Plan Land Use map and A@achment 10 includes the Zoning map as reference to aid in idenfying where these zones are. Staff will also be reviewing some of the specific plans to idenfy what changes may need to be made for these uses.

Attachment 11 illustrates the location of the specific plans throughout the City.

The Commission also recognized the limited availability of vacant, developable land and expressed a desire to gain a be=er understanding of market demand to support the highest and best use for remaining developable parcels. Attachment 8 includes an inventory of the remaining vacant lands as of the publishing of this report.

There was a general concern about the proliferaon and overconcentraon of vehicle-oriented businesses such as carwashes, drive-throughs, and gasoline service staons. One strategy discussed to address over-concentraon of specific uses is to include a minimum separaon requirement for like uses within the code. As such, staff has prepared A@achments 6 and 7 which illustrate potenal separaon distances from exisng drive-throughs and gasoline service staons, respecMully. The maps illustrate 1/4 mile, 1/2 mile, 3/4 mile and 1 mile radiuses from the exisng facilies to aid in visualizing possible scenarios, should the Commission wish to recommend a minimum separaon requirement for future carwashes and gasoline service stations.

In addion to locaon-related standards, the Commission was recepve to exploring enhanced design standards to address aesthec concerns with vehicle-oriented businesses, parcularly drivethroughs. Staff is currently exploring best pracces from other jurisdicons to idenfy possible enhancements to the development standards for these types of uses which may include, but are not limited to, site orientation, landscaped berms, structural screening, and dense landscape screening.

Finally, the Commission emphasized the importance of addressing safety and security for uses such as long-term electric vehicle charging and truck and trailer rental/storage uses. Staff will work 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
868
closely with the Riverside County Sheriff's Office to develop strategies to address safety and security within the development standards for these uses.

Environmental
This public workshop is provided for discussion purposes, and no approval or determinaon will be made by the City at this me. Therefore, no environmental review has been considered because the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects that are subject to discreonary approval.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.

Fiscal Impact
This workshop and the processing of a potenal City-iniated Municipal Code Amendment is covered under the Planning Division's Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25 budget.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
There is no prior City Council or Planning Commission action. However, the Planning Commission has provided informal feedback as described within the Analysis section above.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1: Inventory of Drive-Throughs
Attachment 2: Drive-Through Locations Exhibit
Attachment 3: Mini-Storage Exhibit
Attachment 4: Gasoline Service Station Exhibit
Attachment 5: Eastvale Shopping Centers
Attachment 6: Drive-Through 0.25-miles through 1-mile Radius Attachment 7: Gasoline Service Station 0.25-miles through 1-mile Radius Attachment 8: Site Inventory Map
Attachment 9: General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment 10: Zoning Map
Attachment 11: Specific Plans
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
869

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
Planning Commission Meeting

PUBLIC HEARINGS
Agenda Item No. 8.1
June 18, 2025
PLN25-20033 City-Ini+ated Municipal Code Amendment for DriveThrough and Drive-In Restaurants, Carwashes, Gasoline Service Sta+ons, Alterna+ve Fueling Sta+ons, Electric Vehicle Charging Sta+ons, Mini-Storage Facili+es, and Truck and Trailer Rental and Storage Facilities
Prepared By:

Allen Lim, Senior Planner
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions:

1. Recommend the City Council determine that the proposed ordinances are not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sec)ons 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c) (3) of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA; and

2. Recommend the City Council approve the Municipal Code Amendments.

Summary
The Planning Commission has expressed the importance of considering the highest and best use for the limited remaining vacant land within the City. Subsequently, there has been a growing number of requests to establish and operate mini-storage facili)es and auto-oriented uses such as carwashes, drive-through food and drink establishments, gasoline service sta)ons, alterna)ve fueling sta)ons, and truck and trailer sales, rental, and storage throughout the City. As a result of the growing interest in these uses, a discussion was ini)ated to obtain feedback on how these land use types should be regulated and gain an understanding of what municipal code changes would be 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
870
appropriate.

The amendments are intended to consider the highest and best use for the limited remaining developable parcels in the city and to address the increased interest in developing mini-storage facili)es and auto-oriented uses such as carwashes, drive-through food and drink establishments, gasoline service sta)ons, alterna)ve fueling sta)ons, and truck and trailer sales, rental and storage facilities
Background
In past mee)ngs, the Planning Commission expressed the importance of considering the highest and best use for the limited remaining vacant land within the City. Subsequently, there has been a growing number of requests to establish and operate mini-storage facili)es and auto-oriented uses such as carwashes, drive-through food and drink establishments, gasoline service sta)ons, alterna)ve fueling sta)ons, and truck and trailer sales, rental, and storage throughout the City. As a result of the growing interest in these uses, a discussion was ini)ated to obtain feedback on how these land use types should be regulated and gain an understanding of what municipal code changes would be appropriate.

On January 18, 2023, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direc)on on how to proceed with drive-through businesses. The Commission recommended that staff further pursue an approach to modify condi)onal use permit findings to ensure land use compa)bility with exis)ng shopping centers and/or their surrounding area of the proposed drivethrough.

On September 18, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direc)on on how to proceed with drive-throughs, carwashes, gasoline sta)ons, alterna)ve fueling sta)ons, mini-storage facili)es, and truck and trailer rental and storage facili)es.

The Commission advised staff to conduct a more in-depth analysis, taking into account the available vacant developable land within the City, the suitability of the proposed land uses within current zoning designa)ons, and the poten)al for implemen)ng alterna)ve regula)ons through enhanced design and development standards.

On October 16, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission with updated informa)on, exhibits, and various redline changes to the Zoning Code based on the input received by the Planning Commission from the September 18, 2024 discussion. The Commission was generally suppor)ve of the changes and provided further direc)on to update the code based on the examples presented.

On February 26, 2025, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the City Council with the updated informa)on, exhibits, and various redline changes to the Zoning Code based on the input received from the Planning Commission from the September 18, 2024, and October 16, 2024 discussions with the Planning Commission. The Council was generally suppor)ve of the changes and provided further direction to update the code based on the examples presented.

A summary of the proposed amendments are provided as A8achment 1 to this report and include the description and purpose of each amendment.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
871
Analysis
Planning Commission and City Council Feedback
On September 18, 2024 the Planning Commission provided the following comments with regard to each of the uses:

Carwashes:

Limit new carwashes to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Look at existing specific plans to determine appropriateness.

Drive-throughs:

Maintain development standards and permitted locations with a CUP.

Explore distance/separation requirements for discussion.

Identify locations of existing drive-throughs and illustrate possible distance radius scenarios.

Explore enhanced design and development standards/requirements for new drive-throughs.

Mini-Storage Facilities:

Limit new mini-storage facilities to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Share results of market analysis prepared for The Ranch area.

Gasoline Service Stations:

Explore prohibi)ng new gasoline service sta)ons in commercial zones and limit to industrial and manufacturing zones.

There is a decreasing need in gasoline service sta)ons with the growth of electric vehicle ownership and mandates.

Alternative Fuel Stations/EV Charging Stations:

Dis)nguish between light duty vehicle charging and heavy duty (truck) charging facili)es and regulate differently in the code.

Require a CUP for new alternative fuel and EV charging stations.

Consider and address safety concerns due to the extended )me necessary for electric vehicle charging.

Truck and Trailer Rental and Storage:

Limit new truck and trailer rental and storage facilities to industrial and manufacturing zones.

Require a CUP for new facilities.

Consider and address safety concerns due to the long-term parking and lack of people at facilities.

On October 16, 2024 the Planning Commission provided the following comments with regard to each of the uses:

Drive-throughs:

Con)nue exploring other agencies’ development standards for drive-through screening, outdoor dining, and pedestrian circulation.

Alternative Fuel Stations/EV Charging Stations:

Create new land uses which dis)nguishes light duty, medium duty, and heavy-duty electric vehicle charging facilities or as consistent with state requirements.

Light duty charging facili)es shall be permiHed in every zone or as required by state 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
872
requirements.

Have staff explore the feasibility of requiring DC fast charging for light duty vehicles in nonresiden)al zones. Consider the requirement of allowing Level 2 charging and DC Fast charging for light duty facilities in park space and public facilities.

In general, the Planning Commission provided guidance to begin the process of amending the Zoning Code with regard to all of the uses discussed. Although the Commission expressed support for con)nuing to allow all of the uses and con)nuing to require condi)onal use permits, there was a general consensus to limit new carwashes, mini-storage facili)es, truck and trailer rental/storage facili)es, and gasoline service sta)ons to be located strictly within industrial and manufacturing zones.

The Commission was generally suppor)ve of con)nuing to allow drive-throughs in the commercial, industrial, and manufacturing zones and also suggested adding electric vehicle charging sta)ons for light duty passenger vehicles within the commercial and industrial zones or as required by state regulations.

The Commission also recognized the limited availability of vacant, developable land and expressed a desire to gain a beHer understanding of market demand to support the highest and best use for remaining developable parcels.

The Commission was recep)ve to exploring enhanced design standards to address aesthe)c concerns with vehicle-oriented businesses, par)cularly drive-throughs. Staff has explored best prac)ces from other jurisdic)ons to iden)fy enhancements to the development standards for these types of uses which include, but are not limited to, site orienta)on, outdoor dining, structural screening, and dense landscape screening.

Finally, the Commission emphasized the importance of addressing safety and security for uses such as long-term electric vehicle charging and truck and trailer rental/storage uses. Staff will work closely with the Riverside County Sheriff's Office to develop strategies to address safety and security within the development standards for these uses.

On February 26, 2025, the City Council was generally in agreement with the recommenda)ons and feedback provided by the Planning Commission expressing similar concerns with aesthe)cs, overconcentration of specific uses, and recognizing the limited availability of vacant and developable land in the city.

Additional Amendments
In addi)on to the proposed changes as discussed as part of the prior land use workshops, a technical change has also been proposed for "Dwelling, Mul)ple Family" as required by Government Code Section 65583.2(h).

Environmental
The proposed ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sec)ons 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State of California Guidelines for Implementa)on of CEQA (commencing with Sec)on 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regula)ons; herein referred to as the “State CEQA Guidelines”) because it will not result in a direct 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
873
or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a “project,” as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.

Fiscal Impact
The processing of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment is covered under the Planning Division's Fiscal Year (FY) 24/25 budget.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On January 18, 2023, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direc)on on how to proceed with drive-through businesses. The Commission recommended that staff further pursue an approach to modify condi)onal use permit findings to ensure land use compa)bility with exis)ng shopping centers and/or their surrounding area of the proposed drivethrough.

On September 18, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission to gain further direc)on on how to proceed with drive-throughs, carwashes, gasoline sta)ons, alterna)ve fueling sta)ons, mini-storage facili)es, and truck and trailer rental and storage facili)es.

The Commission advised staff to conduct a more in-depth analysis, taking into account the available vacant developable land within the City, the suitability of the proposed land uses within current zoning designa)ons, and the poten)al for implemen)ng alterna)ve regula)ons through enhanced design and development standards.

On October 16, 2024, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the Planning Commission with updated informa)on, exhibits, and various redline changes to the Zoning Code based on the input received by the Planning Commission from the September 18, 2024 discussion. The Commission was generally suppor)ve of the changes and provided further direc)on to update the code based on the examples presented.

On February 26, 2025, staff brought forward a land use discussion to the City Council with the updated informa)on, exhibits, and various redline changes to the Zoning Code based on the input received from the Planning Commission from the September 18 and October 16, 2024 discussions with the Planning Commission. The Council was generally suppor)ve of the changes and provided further direction to update the code based on the examples presented.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1: Summary of Amendments
Attachment 2: Draft Resolution and Ordinance
Attachment 3: Public Hearing Notice
Attachment 4: February 26, 2025 - City Council - Staff Report for Land Use Workshop 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
874
RESOLUTION NO. 25- 12

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLN25- 20033, ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 120. 03.20, 120. 03.0, 120. 05.60, 120. 06.10, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SECTION 120. 04. 170 OF

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE MAKING CHANGES TO LAND USES SUCH AS

DRIVE- IN AND DRIVE - THROUGH RESTAURANTS, CARWASHES, ELECTRIC VEHILCE

CHARGING STATIONS, GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS, ALTERNATIVE FUELING

STATIONS, TRUCK AND TRAILER RENTAL AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND MINI -

STORAGE FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has initiated a Municipal Code Amendment ( PLN25- 20033), in order to establish and make changes to land uses such as drive- in and drive -through restaurants, carwashes, electric vehicle charging stations, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini -storage facilities, as described in the title of this resolution and the attached Draft Ordinance ( Exhibit A); and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to consider the highest and best use of land by establishing changes to the City' sregulations to provide clear, objective design standards and findings for drive -through and drive- in restaurants. It also modifies the zoning designations of car washes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini - storage facilities to the industrial and manufacturing zones. Additionally, the municipal code amendment includes updates to the zoning designations and glossary in relation to electric vehicle charging stations; and WHEREAS, the proposed Municipal Code Amendment has been fully evaluated and considered with respect to the City' s
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinances is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060( c)( 2) and 15060( c)( 3) of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA ( commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the " State CEQA Guidelines") because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a " project," as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 18, 2025, at which public testimony was received concerning the drive- throughs, car washes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, electric charging stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini - storage facilities municipal code amendment; and WHEREAS, on May 29, 2025, the City of Eastvale City Clerk published a legal notice concerning the
drive -through and drive- inrestaurants, car washes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, electric charging stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini -storage facilities municipal code amendment in the Press Enterprise, a local newspaper of general circulation, regarding the Planning Commission meeting on June 18, 2025, and the proposed ordinance. 8751

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS
As required by Section 120. 01.70( e) of the Eastvale Municipal Code, the changes contained in this ordinance are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs.

SECTION 2. RECORD OF PROCEEDING
The documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings upon which the Planning Commission' sdecision is based, which include but are not limited to, the staff reports as well as all materials that support the staff reports for the proposed project, are located in the Community Development Department of the City of Eastvale at 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752.

The custodian of these documents is the City Clerk' sOffice of the City of Eastvale.

SECTION 3. DETERMINATION
Based upon the findings outlined in Sections 1, the Planning Commission of the City of Eastvale hereby recommends that the City Council approve PLN25- 20033, to adopt an ordinance to establish Section 120. 04. 170 creating development standards for drive -through and drive- in uses and amend sections 120. 03.20, 120. 03.0, 120. 05.60, and 120. 06.10 of the Eastvale Municipal Code to update the zoning designations of car washes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini -storage facilities to the industrial and manufacturing zones.

Additionally, the municipal code amendment includes updates to the zoning designation and glossary in. relation to electric vehicle charging stations.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of June 2025.

April Rodriguez- Plott
Vice Chair
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Chad H ton
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:

Je . .. Cooper,
Management Analyst
8762

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE)
I, Jessica Cooper, Senior Management Analyst of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Planning Commission Resolution No. 25- 12, was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Eastvale, California, at a meeting held on the 18th day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: Commissioner Hove, Lomeli, and Vice Chair Rodriguez- Plott NOES:

ABSENT: Commissioner Rochelle and Chair Lee
ABSTAIN:

Cooper, MM
Management Analyst
8773
Exhibit ' A'
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-_

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA TO AMEND OF SECTIONS 120. 03.20, 120. 03.0,
120. 05.60, 120. 06.10, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SECTION 120. 04. 170 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE MAKING CHANGES TO

LAND USES SUCH AS DRIVE- IN AND DRIVE -THROUGH RESTAURANTS,

CARWASHES, ELECTRIC VEHILCE CHARGING STATIONS, GASOLINE

SERVICE STATIONS, ALTERNATIVE FUELING STATIONS, TRUCK AND

TRAILER RENTAL AND STORAGE FACILITIES, AND MINI -STORAGE

FACILITI ES
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend the city' s regulations to establish development standards for drive -through and drive- in restaurant uses and establish updated zoning designations for carwashes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini - storage facilities to be located within the industrial and manufacturing zones. Additionally, the municipal code amendment includes updates to the zoning designations and glossary in relation to regulating electric vehicle charging stations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. As required by Section 120. 01.70( e) of the Eastvale Municipal Code, the City Council finds that the changes contained in this ordinance are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs. Specifically, the purpose of this ordinance is to redesignate land uses such as carwashes, gasoline service stations, alternative fueling stations, truck and trailer rental and storage facilities, and mini -storage facilities to the industrial and manufacturing zones. The ordinance establishes development standards and glossary terms for drive -through and drive- in uses, and establishes updates to the zoning designations and glossary terms pertaining to the regulation of electric vehicle charging stations.

Additionally, technical changes were made to clarify the applicability of multi -family dwellings to be consistent with state requirements.

SECTION 2. Amendment of Section 120. 03.20 (Residential and agricultural permitted uses and development standards. Table 3. 2-1 in Section 120. 03.20 (Use matrix for residential and agricultural zones) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to add " Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Small" and add footnote " 2" to " Dwelling, Multiple Family" with the footnote description to read as:
8784
Land Use A- 1 A- 2 RA
RRR- 1 R2
R- 3 PRD R- 5 R- 6 R -T Special
Provisions
Electric Vehicle
Charging Station,
Small
P P P P P P P P P P P Chapter
110. 96
Dwelling,
Multiple Family

P P P P
Public schools are not regulated by this code.
2 Notwithstanding any provision of this code or any specific plan to the contrary, as required by Government Code Section 65583. 2(h) multiple family dwellings shall be permitted by right on any site listed in the City' s Housing Element as available for the development of lower income housing if at least twenty percent of the proposed units are affordable to lower income households during the housing element planning period.

Denotes a specific definition. Please see section 120. 06, glossary.

SECTION 3. Amendment of Section 120. 03.0 (Commercial and industrial permitted uses and development standards`. Table 3.-1 in Section 120. 03.20 (Use matrix for commercial, business park, industrial, and special purpose zones) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to modify the rows for " Car and truck washes ( with or without drive -through operation)", Gasoline service stations, not including the concurrent sale of beer and wine for off -premises consumption", "Gasoline service stations, with concurrent sale of beer and wine for off -premises consumption", " Mini -storage", " Truck and Trailer Sales, Rental, and Storage", addition of Alternative Fueling Station such as but not limited to hydrogen, propane, biodiesel, etc. (with or without retail, rest stop facility, or office)", "Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Small", "Electric Vehicle Charging Station, Large", and removal of " Car washes" to read as:

Land Use C -1/ CP
C -P -S C -O I - P M -SC M -M M -H W- 1 Special
Provisions
Alternative Fueling
Station such as but not
limited to hydrogen,
propane, biodiesel, etc.
with or without retail,
rest stop facility, or
office)
C C
Car washes C
Car and truck washes
with or without drive -
through operation)

P C C C P C P C
Electric Vehicle Charging
Station, Small
P P P P P P P Chapter
110. 96
Electric Vehicle Charging
Station, Large
P P P P P P P Chapter
110. 96
8795
Gasoline service
stations, not including
the concurrent sale of
beer and wine for offpremises consumption

P P C C P C P
Gasoline service
stations, with concurrent
sale of beer and wine for
off -premises
consumption
C E= C C C C
Mini -storage C C C R C R C P Section
120. 04.20
Truck and Trailer Sales,
and Rental, and Storage

C C P C R C P
SECTION 4. Establishment of Section 120. 04, 170 (Drive- in and drive -through uses). The Eastvale Municipal code is amended to establish Section 120. 04. 170 (Drive- in and drive -through uses) for the development standards and requirements for " Drive- in and drive -through uses" to read as:

Sec. 120. 04. 170. Drive- in and drive -through uses.
a) intent. The intent of this section is to do each of the following:
1) Regulate drive -through businesses to ensure compatibility of such uses with surrounding uses and properties.
2) Ensure that an adequate amount of space is allocated for on -site maneuvering and circulation.
3) Ensure vehicles in a queue for service do not impede traffic on abutting streets and parking areas.
4) Ensure that vehicle stacking lanes will not have nuisance impacts on neighboring properties and nearby residential uses.
5) Establish development standards to mitigate the impacts of traffic, congestion, excessive pavement, litter, and noise while ensuring pedestrian connectivity is uninterrupted by vehicles.
6) Ensure outdoor spaces are provided and preserved.
b) Permitted zoning. Drive- inand drive -through facilities shall be allowed per chapter 120. 03, zoning district regulations.
c) Design and development standards.
1) Required studies. The design of all drive -through lanes for any facility shall be subject to review and approval of a drive -through queuing analysis ( or such other study as requested by the City Engineer or their designee) prepared by an independent traffic 8806
engineer' licensed by the State of California, and provided to the City by the developer, at such developer' ssole expense, at the time of application for such use. 2) Building placement and orientation.
a. The minimum net and area for uses with drive -through facilities is one ( 1) acre.

This minimum land area may be modified by the reviewing authority through the design review process when the drive -through facility is within a specific plan or an integrated shopping center.
b. Buildings shall be placed on the front yard or street side yard setback line and oriented so that the primary public entrance faces the street and so that any mechanical equipment or other supporting equipment are screened from the public view at grade and from higher buildings.
c. Outdoor dining and seating areas shall be located near the main pedestrian entrance.
d. Walk- up windows, if used, shall be located near outdoor dining areas or other pedestrian areas, to encourage accessibility and limit vehicle and pedestrian conflicts.
e. Buildings may be clustered to create a plaza or outdoor dining area between buildings.
f. Pedestrian pathways and sidewalks must provide safe and convenient access to the building, shall connect directly to the public right- of- way, and shall not cross driveways or stacking lanes to get to the building entrance. g. The drive -through lanes shall not be located between the property line and the front of the building.
h. Drive -through lanes shall be located to the side or rear of the building and shall be screened with a combination of decorative and split face low screen walls with capping and dense landscaping. The drive -through lanes may be designed to pass through an enclosed building element that is architecturally consistent and integrated into the building' s design so that the lanes are enclosed. i. Loading and service areas must be located on the site to minimize potential noise incompatibility with surrounding properties and so that, to the maximum extent feasible, they are not visible from the rights -of- way.

Future drive -through facilities proposed in a master plan or shopping center shall be identified early in the review process to avoid retrofitting the site at a later date.
8817
Figure 4. 17-. Drive -Through Design

JVLIC STREET
0 0
0 Raised pedestrian crossing
Low screening of parking
Landscape buffer to screen
stacking lane
3) Building entrances.
0 0
0 Pedestrian access and
connection to the sidewalk
Low landscaping to ma. ntam
site lines to pedestrian crossing
Exterior dmmg patio activating
street frontage
0 0
0 Walk- up window
Street trees provided
along public right- of- way
Menu board
l—
F
LE3LIC
STR
a. Primary building entrances and entry features shall be clearly defined through variation of architectural planes on the building and pavement surfaces, and must be accessible from a courtyard or plaza.
b. The primary building entries shall be accessed directly from the sidewalk in the public right- of- way or from within the development site. Pedestrian circulation paths may only intersect or cross a drive -through lane( s) if the applicant can demonstrate that there are no other feasible or practical options available, in which case the pedestrian crossing shall be raised to create a hump to enhance pedestrian safety.
4) Building architecture and articulation.

Prominent architectural features shall be located near corners, intersections, or where visible to the public right- of- way to promote and enhance the primary building entrance.
8828
b. Drive -through facilities within an integrated shopping center or master plan must have an architectural style consistent with the theme established in the center. c. The architecture of drive -through facilities must be compatible and consistent with surrounding uses in form, materials, colors, scale, etc. d. Building planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building. e. Articulation of building surfaces shall be encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns.
f. For the purposes of screening, mechanical and/ or electrical equipment, when feasible shall be integrated into the architecture and design of the proposed building.
5) Outdoor dining areas for restaurants.
a. Outdoor dining areas are required for all new drive- in and drive -through restaurant facilities.
b. Outdoor dining areas shall be designed as an integral part of the drive -through facility, and can include plazas, arcades, colonnades, or courtyards. c. Outdoor dining areas and other publicly accessible outdoor spaces shall include tables and seating, trash cans, and structures that provide shade and protection from the weather.
d. To the maximum extent feasible, outdoor dining areas shall be oriented for maximum benefit of sunlight and views and to the extent possible, outdoor dining areas shall be oriented away from drive -through stacking lanes. e. The minimum dimension of an outdoor dining area shall be 20 feet measured in any direction with a minimum area of 450 square feet.
6) Parking and Circulation
a. Parking. The parking for drive -through facilities shall be determined according to Sec. 120. 05.60. - Off- street vehicle parking.
b. Setbacks. Parking and the drive -through lane( s) shall be set back a minimum of 45 feet from the curb face of a public street. Greater setbacks may be required as mentioned in an applicable specific plan or as deemed necessary during the design review process.
7) Stacking requirements.
a. Drive - through lanes shall be designed to accommodate adequate vehicle stacking as determined by a drive -through queuing analysis, reviewed by the City Engineer or their designee, that shall be based on the number of vehicles in the drive -through lanes for seven ( 7) consecutive days during peak lunch hours 8839
between 11: 00 a. m. to 2: 00 p. m. and peak dinner hours between 5: 00 p. m. to 8: 00 p. m. at three ( 3) different locations in cities with a similar population as Eastvale and in a similar location as the proposed site. At the request of the City Engineer or their designee, additional information may be requested to ensure a complete and accurate evaluation of the drive -through design. b. All stacking must be designed to be accommodated on the site of the drivethrough use without impacting or causing obstructions to adjacent tenants, drive -aisles, parking spaces, or public or private streets. c. In the event that the number of vehicles waiting at the service window or kiosk exceeds the length of the stacking lane( s), personnel from the drive -through establishment shall manage the queue to ensure that all vehicles do not block or interfere with on - site vehicular and pedestrian circulation and parking areas. d. Drive - Through Lane Design
i. The entrance and exit of a drive -through lane must be at least 50 feet from an intersection of public rights -of -way when measured at the closest intersecting curbs.
i i . The drive -through lane must be at least 10 feet wide with a minimum 10 - foot interior radius at curves.
i i i. At a minimum, food and beverage drive -through businesses shall provide stacking space for at least six ( 6) vehicles before the order menu board, and other service -oriented drive - through businesses shall provide stacking space for at least six ( 6) vehicles before the drive - up window or kiosk.
iv. The drive -through panes shall be separate from the circulation route necessary for ingress and egress frorn the property or access to any parking spaces within the site using concrete curbing or paint striping on at least one side of the lane. These requirements do not apply to the reuse of existing properties.
v. All stacking lanes must be clearly identified with pavement markings and signage to indicate the entrance, direction of traffic flow and exit. vi. At the discretion of the approving authority, the driveway -through lane design may be required to provide for a minimum nine ( 9) feet wide escape/ emergency lane allowing motorists to exit the stacking lane before reaching the drive -through window.
8) Performance Standards
a. The use shall be operated in a manner that does not interfere with the normal use of adjoining properties. If, in the opinion of the Community Development Director or their designee, the provisions of this paragraph are being violated, the violations shall be grounds for reopening conditional use permit hearings and adding conditions to control the violation. Performance standards include, but are not limited to, the following considerations, which, where appropriate, shall be incorporated as conditions of approval in all use permits as determined by the approving body:
i. All graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
88410
ii. No undesirable odors shall be generated on the site. iii. Noise levels measured at the property line shall not exceed the level of background noise normally found in the area or as required per Chapter

8. 52. — Noise regulation.
iv. All exterior lighting shall be contained to the subject property and shall not encroach onto neighboring properties as consistent with Sec. 120. 05.0. —Outdoor lighting.
v. A traffic management plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. This plan shall include detailed information and mitigation measures ( such as traffic control measures, tablets, online orders, temporary drive -through closures, and/ or use of off -duty officers for traffic control) to ensure visitor vehicles shall remain completely on -site and shall not impede any public rights -of -way ( streets, drives, walks, etc.), drive aisles, parking spaces, etc. This plan shall be kept onsite and made available to the store manager from implementation as required.
9) Additional permit findings.
a. In addition to the findings required for the granting of the applicable discretionary application, the following additional findings are required to be made by the approving body in approving a discretionary permit for a drive - through business:
i. That the proposed amount of parking, circulation plan, and traffic management plan will provide adequate area for safe stacking and maneuvering of vehicles, and the site design will provide adequate buffering for the use from adjoining land uses:
ii. The proposed location of the drive -through facility will not result in adverse impacts upon the vicinity after giving consideration to a litter clean- up plan, the hours of operation, and the site plan; iii. The proposed location of the drive -through facility will not block existing drive aisles in shared parking areas;
iv. The proposed location of the drive -through facility will not interfere with and or impact on -site pedestrian access and circulation. v. The use will not substantially less the usability of adjacent or nearby commercially zoned property or commercial use by interfering with pedestrian traffic;
vi. That the use will not create increased traffic hazards to pedestrians; vii. That the site will be adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and to accommodate all yards, walls, parking, landscaping, and other required improvements; and
viii. That the use will not substantially lessen the usability and suitability of adjacent or nearby residentially zoned property for residential use.

SECTION 5. Amendment of Section 120. 05.60. Section 120. 05.60 (Off- street vehicle 88511
parking) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to make clarifying changes to the stacking criteria of drive- throughs to read as follows:

Use Type Per Square Foot or Unit Per Employee
or Student
Other Criteria
Banks, savings and loans
and other financial
institutions*
1 space per 250 sq. ft.
gross floor area
Vehicle stacking for 6
vehicles prior to the drive -
up window or as required
by the queueing analysis.

Restaurants, drivethroughs, walk- ups, cafes,
lounges, bars and other
establishments for the
sale and consumption on
the premises of food and
beverages
1 space per 45 sq. ft. of
serving area
1 space per 2 employees Stacking for 6 vehicles
prior to the menu board
or as required by the
queueing analysis.

SECTION 6. Amendment of Section 120. 06.10. Section 120. 06.10 (Glossary of terms) of the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended to add the definition for " Drive- in and drive -through operations or facilities", "Electric vehicle charging station, small", and " Electric vehicle charging station, large" to read as follows:

Drive- in and drive -through operations or facilities, means a business which includes dining services ( such as but not limited to restaurants, coffee shops, or online food/ beverage order pick- up) or other services ( such as but not limited to banks, carwashes, pharmacies, or other pick- up operations) that are designed so that customers can be served while remaining in their vehicles in a dedicated queue lane.

Electric vehicle charging station, small means a station that is designed and operated as a use ancillary to the primary permitted use on the site ( such as a single family residence, condominium, apartment, office building, commercial retail, parking lot, garage or structure) in order to deliver electricity to personal or commercial passenger vehicles and trucks owned or operated by individuals who either reside or work on the site or are guests on the site where the charging station is located.

Electric vehicle charging station, large means a station that is designed to charge personal passenger vehicles and trucks and/ or commercial passenger vehicles and trucks which is open to the public, whether with or without the payment of fees, subscriptions or monetary charges for the service. A " large electric vehicle charging station" includes the electrical and mechanical equipment as defined in Article 625 of the California Electrical Code, and any subsequent amendments, that is necessary to delivery electricity from a source outside an electric vehicle into a plug- inelectric vehicle. It does not include ancillary equipment and facilities that are not directly necessary for the charging of plug- in electric vehicles, including but not limited to, canopies ( with or without solar panels), patronage resting facilities, commercial sales kiosks or buildings, public restrooms, family amenities or pet amenities. Such ancillary equipment and facilities are not subject to the expedited application and permitting requirements as referenced in Chapter 110. 96, electric vehicle charging systems, but shall be subject to the applicable development review process as 88612
referenced in Section 120. 02.10, development review.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance, and each Chapter, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty ( 30) days after its passage by the City Council.

SECTION 7. City Clerk Action. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause this Ordinance to be published within fifteen ( 15) days after its passage in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the City in accordance with Government Code Chapter 36933( a) or, to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law using the alternative summary and pasting procedure authorized under Government Code Chapter 39633( c).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this _ day of , 2025.

Mike McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

Erica Vega
City Attorney
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
Government Services Director/ City Clerk
88713

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE)
I, Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/ City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the _ day of , 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at aregular meeting held on the _ day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Marc A. Donohue, MMC
Government Services Director/ City Clerk
88814

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting

CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BUSINESS Agenda Item No. 13.1
August 13, 2025
Introduc0on of an Ordinance Approving the Use of Electronic Filing of Campaign Statements
Prepared By:

Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an ordinance en tled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING OF FAIR

POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION (FPPC) CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS Summary
The City Clerk's Office accepts campaign disclosure statements in paper format and manually processes, redacts, and uploads them to the City website. The Poli cal Reform Act requires
campaign statements to be posted online within 72 hours of filing. Transi oning to an electronic
filing system will streamline these processes, improve compliance, and increase public access to campaign finance information.

Background
Government Code Sec
on 84615, within the Poli
cal Reform Act, authorizes local government
agencies to require online or electronic filing of campaign statements, reports, or other documents for elected officials, candidates, commi@ees, and other persons required to file under the Act, provided they receive contribu
ons or make expenditures totaling $2,000 or more in a calendar year. Since the passage of this legisla
on, many local agencies throughout California have adopted electronic filing systems to enhance transparency, improve efficiency, and reduce paper use. The Fair Poli
cal Prac
ces Commission (FPPC) strongly supports and encourages the transi on to
electronic filing systems.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
889
To implement mandatory electronic filing of campaign statements, Government Code Sec on 84615
requires the City Council to adopt an ordinance approving the use of an online filing system and finding that the system operates securely, effec
vely, and does not place an undue burden on filers.

The approved system must ensure data integrity, use standardized formats compa ble with the
Secretary of State, be free of charge to filers, and provide public access to filings.

The NetFile system meets all legal requirements and is specifically designed for agencies administering campaign finance and economic interest filings. It supports electronic filing of several FPPC forms, including Forms 460, 470, 496, and 497, which are the most commonly used forms in local campaigns. The system is highly secure, employing industry best prac ces such as bank-level
data encryp
on, mul
-loca
on data storage, and regular data backups to ensure data integrity and disaster recovery. The City currently u
lizes NeHile for the annual Form 700 filings for the City Council, Commissions, and staff.

Adop
on of this ordinance will enable the City to fully implement the NetFile system for campaign finance disclosure, ensuring compliance with state requirements while providing a more efficient and transparent filing process.

Environmental
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.

Fiscal Impact
The annual subscrip
on cost for the NetFile electronic filing system is $5,450 and is incorporated into the City Clerk’s exis
ng General Fund budget. The system also provides cost savings through reduced staff time for processing and managing filings.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Ordinance
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
890
ORDINANCE NO. 25-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE,

CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING OF FAIR POLITICAL

PRACTICES COMMISSION (FPPC) CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS WHEREAS, Government Code Section 84615 provides that a local agency may adopt an Ordinance to require an elected officer, candidate, committee, or other person required to file statements, reports, or other documents required by Chapter 4 of the Political Reform Act (commencing with Section 84100 of the Government Code), except an elected officer, candidate, committee, or other person who receives contributions totaling less than $2,000 and who makes independent expenditures totaling less than $2,000 in a calendar year, to file those statements, reports, or other documents online or electronically with the local filing officer; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has entered into an agreement with NetFile, Inc., a vendor approved by the California Secretary of State, to provide an online electronic filing system (“System”) for campaign disclosure statements and statements of economic interest forms; and
WHEREAS. the System meets all legal requirements, is highly secure, employs industry best practices for operational security and efficiency, will not unduly burden filers and is specifically designed for agencies administering campaign finance and economic interest filings supporting electronic filing of a variety of Fair Political Practices Committee (FPPC) forms; and WHEREAS. the City of Eastvale desires to allow for electronic and paperless filing of Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) campaign disclosure statements.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and that the System will operate securely and effectively and will not unduly burden filers.

Specifically, the System will:
 Ensure the integrity of the data and includes safeguards against efforts to tamper with, manipulate, alter, or subvert the data;
 Only accept a filing in the standardized record format developed by the Secretary of State and compatible with the Secretary of State's system for receiving an online or electronic filing; and
 Be available free of charge to filers and to the public for viewing filings. These findings are based upon the vendor’s approval by the California Secretary of State to provide these services and the representations of the vendor that the System meets the requirements of Government Code Section 84615. 891
SECTION 2. Mandatory Electronic Filing. Any elected officer, candidate, committee or other person required to file campaign statements, reports, or other documents required by Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 84100) of the California Government Code, except an elected officer, candidate, committee, or other person who receives contributions totaling less than one thousand dollars ($1,000), and makes expenditures totaling less than two thousand dollars ($2,000), in a calendar year, shall file those statements, reports, or other documents using the City’s electronic filing system in accordance with any applicable administrative policies and procedures established by the City Clerk.

SECTION 3. CEQA. The City Council finds, pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(5), that this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that it is a governmental, organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 5. Notice. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be entered into the City of Eastvale’s book of original ordinances, make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting and within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance will take effect on the 30th day following its final passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ____, 2025. __________________________________________
Mike McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica L. Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk
892

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 13
th day of August, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ day of _____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
893

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting

CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BUSINESS Agenda Item No. 13.2
August 13, 2025
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance entled: AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER

10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN

STREETS
Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014; June 24, 2015; July 11, 2018; January 26, 2022; January 11, 2023 and June 25, 2025. Since the June 25, 2025 approval of the speed surveys, the following five (5) street segments have been studied:

Segment 14: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd between Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway Segment 19: Goodman Way between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Hamner Ave Segment 24: Hamner Avenue between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Riverside Dr Segment 34: Limonite Avenue between Sumner Ave and Eastern City Limit Segment 41: Riverside Dr between Hamner Ave and Eastern City Limit Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of appropriate and safe travel speeds, and to protect the general public from the risks posed by reckless or unpredictable driving behavior.

Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
894
speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads.

Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

In California, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be set using an Engineering and Traffic Survey (ETS), rather than through arbitrary methods. This approach ensures that speed limits are defensible and appropriate for the roadway condions. The CVC also includes the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350), which states:
“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Properly posted speed limits assist law enforcement in cing drivers who violate the Basic Speed Law and give drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The engineering and traffic survey study involves the three major elements of data collecon and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Secon 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edion, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:

Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideraon for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilies, users of personal assisve mobility devices, and the unhoused.

The City Council last adopted an Engineering and Traffic Survey on July 24, 2013, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023, June 25, 2025. Since the June 25, 2025 approval of the speed surveys, the following five (5) street segments have been studied:

Segment 14: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd between Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway Segment 19: Goodman Way between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Hamner Ave Segment 24: Hamner Avenue between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Riverside Dr Segment 34: Limonite Avenue between Sumner Ave and Eastern City Limit Segment 41: Riverside Dr between Hamner Ave and Eastern City Limit These segments were studied for the following reasons:

1. Reevaluation due to change in road characteristics:

Segment 14: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd between Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
895
Segment 34: Limonite Avenue between Sumner Ave and Eastern City Limit

2. Required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:

Segment 19: Goodman Way between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Hamner Ave Segment 24: Hamner Avenue between Cantu Galleano Ranch Rd and Riverside Dr Segment 41: Riverside Dr between Hamner Ave and Eastern City Limit Based on the ETS results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these five (5) segments is shown below:

Segment No. Street Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Rd
Hamner Ave to I-15 Freeway 50 50
19 Goodman Way
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd to
Hamner Ave
35 35
24 Hamner Ave
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd to
Riverside Dr
50 45
34 Limonite Ave
Sumner Ave to Eastern City
Limit
45 45
41 Riverside Dr
Hamner Ave to Eastern City
Limit
45 45
The recommended speed limits were reviewed and found acceptable by the Riverside County Sheriff's Office, which provides contract law enforcement services to the City of Eastvale.

To ensure enforceability, each speed limit recommendaon must be supported by an ETS that can withstand legal scruny. This survey includes all required documentaon under State law. Once the ordinance is adopted, updates to posted speed limits will be implemented accordingly.

Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2 | Target #: 5 | Goal #: 7 Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addional speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esmated to be $3,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695- 92001-0000.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
896
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023 and June 25, 2025.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Ordinance - Phase 2
Attachment 2 - 2025 Speed Survey Amendment Phase 2
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
897
ORDINANCE NO. 25-__

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN STREETS
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defines an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Collision Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
898
No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 57
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 55
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 48
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 45 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 51
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 48
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 54
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 55
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 47
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 40
29 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 52
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 52
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 49
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 48
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 43
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
899
No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40 (b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the abovelisted streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 35 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue
Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 55
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 50
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 45
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 45
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 50
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 35
29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 50
900
No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 45
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 45
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 50
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 45
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 35
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35 Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect." SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. 901
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of ____, 2025. __________________________________________
Michael McMinn
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Government Services Director
902

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Government Services Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 25-__, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 11th of June, 2025, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the __ of ____, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Government Services Director
903

August 2025
Citywide Speed Zone Survey
(Draft)
Adopted on _______, 2025 by Ordinance 25-__
Adopted on June 25, 2025 by Ordinance 25-06
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 23-13
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 22-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 2018-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 15-04
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July 24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10
Approved By:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 1650
Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra Group, Inc.
904
905

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9

4.0 Roadway Segment Field Review 12

4.1 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13

4.2 Factors That May Be Considered 13

4.3 Recommended Speed Limits 13

4.4 Speed Limit Signing 14

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 15

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance 15

APPENDIX

APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Table
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10
906
907
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for five (5) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied, that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified, and that the provisions of AB 43 have been incorporated in the analysis. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits. Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022, while other sections went into effect on January 1, 2023. All sections are currently in effect. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, which took effect on January 1, 2023, when Revision 8 of the CA MUTCD was approved, and on April 1, 2025, when Revision 9 of the CA MUTCD was approved.

On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023 and June 25, 2025. Since the June 25, 2025 City Council approval of the speed surveys, the following five (5) street segments have been studied:
908
Introduction
2 14 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 19 Goodman Way between Cantu Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 24 Hamner Avenue between Cantu Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 35 Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 41 Riverside Drive between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit The segments below were studied for the following reasons:

1. Roadway segment that has additional lanes due to restriping:
 Cantu Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway – Segment 14

2. Segments that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:
 Goodman Way between Cantu Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue – Segment 19  Hamner Avenue between Cantu Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive – Segment 24  Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit – Segment 35  Riverside Drive between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit – Segment 41 This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the five (5) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.

At five (5) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD: CA MUTCD 2014, rev 9 (2025). Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix G. 909
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The engineering and traffic survey study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver Other factors that may also be considered include:
 Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, passed in 2021, introduced concepts from Vision Zero into the determination of speed limits. AB 1938, passed in 2022, made further modifications. The goal of Vision Zero is to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries to zero, based on the Safe System Approach. The basic tenet of Vision Zero is that human beings are vulnerable to traffic collisions, the severity of injuries and death are directly affected by speed, and roadway speeds should be reduced wherever possible, using the Safe System Approach, to achieve Vision Zero. AB 43 maintains the use of the 85th percentile speed as the base for setting speed limits, but makes it easier to reduce speed limits. The effects of AB 43 are discussed below, under Analysis. 910
Study Methodology
4 Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for five (5) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.

Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the five (5) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 (two years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review. The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.

AB 43 also allows the speed limits as determined above, to be reduced an additional 5 mph or the existing speed limits to be maintained under certain conditions. If a local authority, after 911
Study Methodology
5 completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance:
 Reduce the speed limit by an additional five miles per hour on a section of highway designated as a Safety Corridor or if the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.  Retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
 Determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Crash Data on California State Highways (Road Miles, Travel, Crashes, Crash Rates) published by Caltrans. The latest edition, 2023, was used for this 2025 analysis.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 106
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years Where: Number of midblock collisions based on 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.
912
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey
Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the five (5) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data collected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
 Posted speed limit
 Direction of survey
 Date and time of speed survey
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed in each direction
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 15th percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent under pace speed
 Average speed
The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 913
7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(Amended August 2025)
No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 46 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 & CVC 22358.6(c) 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street /
East City Limit
E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 6
68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street
N/S 55 57 55 No Change - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and
Schleisman Road
N/S 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit
N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 12
Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway E/W 50 48 50 No Change – 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W
35 45 35 No Change – 85%ile, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decreased - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road
N/S 50 48 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the south. 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive
N/S 50 54 45 Reduced - 85th%ile, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2). Continuity with speed limits to the south. 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S None 55 50 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 26 27
Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue2 N/S 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way2
N/S 45 40 35 Decrease - 85th%ile, Option 1 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 29 30
Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Ch. NE/SW None3 52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety 33 Cucamonga Creek Ch to Archibald Avenue NE/SW None3
52 45 Establishing speed limit - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety 34 35
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 (Continued on Next Page)
914
8 No Street Between Dir
Existing
Speed Limit3
(mph)
85th%ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I15)E/W None 59 55 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs
Street
E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2
41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 43 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None 43 40 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 1Roadway segments studied for 2025 E&TS are highlighted in gray. 2 Segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Rd & Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Ave since the character of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave. 3Two segments, currently studied (Nos. 32 & 33), did not previously have a speed limit set by an Engineering and Traffic Survey. 4See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA laws, AB 43 & AB 1938. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 915
9 Survey Results

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis
The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the five (5) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.

Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”
It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither roadway segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 106
Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive:

Collision Rate = 1 x 106
17,865 x 365 x 1.23 x 2
= 0.06 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)
The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2023 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the five (5) segments studied in the August 2025 analysis, and are shown in the table below.

No. Street Between Lane Type
Statewide
Collision
Rate1
14 Cantu Galleano
Ranch Road Hamner Avenue & I-15 Freeway 6 lanes, Divided 1.06 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 3 lanes, Undivided 1.11 24 Hamner Avenue Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 4 lanes, Undivided 1.33 35 Limonite Avenue Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 6 lanes, Divided 1.06 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 4 lanes, Undivided 1.33 1 Statewide Collision Rates listed are averages for Suburban (Rural Inside City + Urban Outside City) roads. 916
10 Table 2: Collision Analysis
(Amended August 2025)
No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Colli
Ra
(Col/M
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.0 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 6,155 0 0.0 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3,755 1 0.2 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.0 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0. 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.2 7 Archibald Avenue Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street 1.46 7,700 13,631 3 0. 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 1.63 8,580 20,934 7 0. 9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0. 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.0 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0. 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.49 5,450 10,308 0 0.0 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2,497 0 0.0 14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 31,187 1 0. 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3,828 1 0. 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.2 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.4 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.0 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 6,365 9 2.8 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.0 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.5 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.91 4,800 22,223 16 0.7 23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 0.83 4,400 25,139 3 0.2 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,865 1 0.0 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.99 5,200 23,400 1 0.0 26 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0. 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 8,461 2 0. 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way (New) 0.21 1,100 3,015 0 0.0 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.3 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.2 31 Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.0 (Continued on Next Page)
917
11 No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily
Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate
More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel (New) 0.60 3,150 14,735 1 0.16 1.17 No 33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue (New) 0.56 2,950 15.549 0 0.00 1.17 No 34 Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 1.17 No 35 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 38,582 12 0.28 1.06 No 36 Mission Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7,806 4 0.62 1.32 No 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 20,231 3 0.46 1.33 No 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 6,389 0 0.00 1.24 No 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4,721 0 0.00 0.91 No 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6,678 1 0.20 1.60 No 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes 1 Newly-surveyed roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 2-year period for newly surveyed segments and 3-year period for prior segments. 3 Col/MVM = Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 4 The previous survey on Harrison Avenue (Segment 27) included the segment of Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Blossom Way was split into two segments at Limonite Avenue. The latest surveyed segment (Segment 28) includes Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way since, the portion of the road north of Limonite Ave is different from south of Limonite Ave, the previously-surveyed segment, in width and traffic volume..
918
12 Survey Results

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review
Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The roadway segments were driven and videorecorded by Mr. Alan Perkins, Senior Engineering Technician, and reviewed by Ruth Smith, Senior Traffic Engineer (contracted through Ardurra Group).

The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were noted in the study on the Strip Maps, found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and Section 22358.6(b).

The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.
 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Factors Indicating Land or Facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, including the presence of sidewalks, bikeways, crosswalks, schools, parks, employment centers, retail, senior centers, cultural areas, religious facilities, health/medical facilities and transit stops
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Adjacent Land Uses
919
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 SECTION 4.0

SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Factors That May Be Considered
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.  Most recent collision record (mid-block)
 Roadway characteristics
 Shoulder condition
 Grade
 Alignment
 Sight Distance
 Roadside development and environment
 Parking practices and pedestrian activity
 Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
 Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
 Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
 Residential density
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

4.2 Recommended Speed Limits
The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 920
Survey Findings and Recommendations
14 4.3 Speed Limit Signing
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side-street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over-signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested. 921
Summary and Conclusions
15 SECTION 5.0

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 9, Section 2B.13.

2. Radar speed surveys and daily traffic counts for five (5) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2025 on March 25.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.

5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on one (1) of the five (5) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed, as listed below.

Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit No. Street Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
24 Hamner Avenue Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road &
Riverside Drive 50 45 Reducing speed limit
by 5 mph – 85th
percentile, Option 2
& CVC
22358.7(A)(2)

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance
Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as provided on the following pages.
922

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated August 2025)
923
924
1 Appendix A

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS

INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific two-year interval of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, and a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.

In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:

If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.

If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.

Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 925
2 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar or lidar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits
22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits
22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 926
3 Appendix A
40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.) Downward Speed Zoning Exceptions
22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Initial Rounding to Nearest Five MPH
22358.6 (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Note: Section 22358.6 was modified by Assembly Bill 1938, and the modifications became effective on January 1, 2023.

Additional Five MPH Reduction
22358.7 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine 927
4 Appendix A
and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).

In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. Note: Revision 8 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2014 Edition, effective on January 26, 2023, includes the provisions of this section, making them currently effective.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.7 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.

Maintaining Existing Speed Limit
22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 928
5 Appendix A
1, 2022, then was amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit
22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Speed Trap 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
929
6 Appendix A
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning and became effective on January 1, 2022.):
(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
930
7 Appendix A
(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone, business activity district or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business 931
8 Appendix A
activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then modified by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.) Speed Trap Evidence
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c)When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of 932
9 Appendix A
separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District
515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination
240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
(c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.
933
10 Appendix A
Maximum Speed Limit
22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
934
11 Appendix A
1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For the purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transporatation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the grant funding, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)
State Highways within Local Jurisdictions
22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.
(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.) 22354.5 (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular 935
12 Appendix A
portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to that portion of state highway. The Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the speed limit.

Boundary Line Streets
22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways
22361. On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.
936
13 Appendix A
937
938

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated August 2025)
939
940
17 Appendix B
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated April 2025)
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates.

Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a 941
18 Appendix B
particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c). 3.

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC 942
19 Appendix B
Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85thpercentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B-103(CA) and 2B-104(CA), which provides examples of 85th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7. 12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).

Support:
12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.

CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.

Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways.
12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.

Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State 943
20 Appendix B
Highway System
12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.

CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a, and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.

Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:

1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.

2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more of the required crash weighting factors listed in the Table 2B-105(CA) shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.

Option:
12p Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Standard:
12q The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12r Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.

Guidance:
12s A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.

Option:
12t For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. 12u To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.

Standard:
944
21 Appendix B
12v A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.

Option:
12w Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12x Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.

Option:
12y Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet. Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet. Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.

Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.

Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
945
22 Appendix B
CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:

1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.

2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.

3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:

4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.

5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.

6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. 7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c). 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are 946
23 Appendix B
traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication. 23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 947
24 Appendix B
vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that 948
25 Appendix B
conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.

Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed 949
26 Appendix B
approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
950
27 Appendix B
• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed 951
28 Appendix B
limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
952
29 Appendix B
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
953
30 Appendix B
b. The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
c. Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
b. A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352. 96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).

Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
 The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are 954
31 Appendix B
met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
105 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 955
32 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 956
33 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 957
34 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 958
35 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 959
36 Appendix B
1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938. 960
37 Appendix B
Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD
Text Headings
Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases
Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed—the summation of the instantaneous or spot-measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85thpercentile speeds. (e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
961
38 Appendix B
Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)—the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 962
39 Appendix B
exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study—the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi-lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross-section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities—a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human-powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared-use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non-motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
963
40 Appendix B
Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
964
965

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated August 2025)

966
967
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586

0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
968
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 2
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
40 mph
No Change, same as existing
85th percentile speed, Option 1 & CVC 22358.6(c)
Residential
38 - 47 mph
40 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Heavy pedestrian & vehicular traffic during school. Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and bike traffic.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane, Divided. Straight alignment. Bike lanes, but substandard.

Comments:

Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary at Harrison Ave.

Residences do not front on 65th St. - no direct access. 46 65th Street
Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
6,155
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted median
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
969
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No

0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
Appendix C
970
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642

0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
971
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,239
5,260

1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
972
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,469
2,650

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
973
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Bluff Street & Wind River/Grapewin Street Segment No.: 7 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 NB/SB from Bluff to Baron, 3 NB/SB from Baron or River/Kendra, 3SB & 2NB merge to 1NB River/Kendra to Corbin/Prado Basin, 3SB & 1- 2NB Corbin to Wind River
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
55 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
13,631
7,700

1.46 3SB, 2NB w/ Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
55 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
974
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.29
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580

1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
975
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limit Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010

1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
976
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030

0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Cul-de-sac near River Road.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
977
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650

1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.

Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
978
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575

0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comments:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
979
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comments:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
980
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
8/4/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 No
85th percentile speed.

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes, Heavy truck traffic at times.

Roadway Geometrics:
3 lanes each direction w/raised median. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Light Industrial & Commercial
40-49 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.10
2,323

0.44 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
0 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
East/West
Traffic Data
31,187
Appendix C
981
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075

1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
982
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.14
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.

Comments:

Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.

Appendix C
983
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.39
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626

0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
Appendix C
984
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curves.

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
985
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 19
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
8/4/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
45 Goodman Avenue
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd & Hamner Ave
North/South & East/West
Traffic Data
6,365
3,600

0.68 3-Lane Undivided
Local Road
Speed Survey Data
Mix of Retail/Big Box/Warehouse Uses
35-44 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
9 2.85

1.11 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns. No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed. Many peds crosing during shift change.

Roadway Geometrics:
1 lane NB & 2 lanes SB for N/S, 2 lanes in each direction for E/W. 2-way left turn lane on both segments.

Roadway is generally N/S, but makes a 90 degree turn to west at the south end & proceeds E/W to Hamner Ave.

Straight alignment with S-curve at north end. 2-way left turn lane both N/S & E/W. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd.

Comments:

The segment collision rate is 2.57 times the statewide rate, allowing the collision rate to be used to reduce the speed limit by 5 mph with Option 1, however, not relevant in this case. Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2).

Appendix C
986
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295

0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
987
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
988
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,223
4,800

0.91 Single Lane Each Direction w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
8 0.36, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes. No sidewalk on west side s/o 58th. 2SB/3NB from Limonite to n/o Eastvale Gateway, 1SB/1NB n/o Eastvale Gateway to n/o 58th, 2SB/3NB from n/o 58th to Bellegrave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway width reductions.

Comments:
high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high driveway density, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
989
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 23
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Matches segments to the south.

Commercial, Residential and Industrial
38 - 47 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:
5-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Residences do not front onto Hamner Avenue - no direct access. 48 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Ave & Cantu-Calleano Ranch Rd
North/South
Traffic Data
25,139
4,400

0.83 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
990
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 24
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
8/4/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
54 Hamner Avenue
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd & Riverside Dr
North/South
Traffic Data
17,865
6,500

1.23 4-Lane Undivided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Light Industrial & Commercial
43-52 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.06

1.33 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times.

Roadway Geometrics:
2 Lanes NB. SB (in Ontario) varies due to different stages of adjacent land use development, from 2 lanes at north end to 1 lane to 2 lanes to 3 lanes to 4 lanes & back to 2 lanes at the south end. Primarily 2-way left turn lane with a section of painted median. For purposes of the E&TS, assume 4-Lane Undivided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, reduced by 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2). Provides continuity with segments to the south.

Appendix C
991
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5. 2018
Between: Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 23,400
Length of Segment (feet): 5,200
Length of Segment (miles): 0.99
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ 2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53 mph
10 mph Pace: 41-50 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016- December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.06
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Some sections do not have curb & gutter. Segments of sidewalk missing. Heavy truck activity.

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. North of SR-60 WB Ramps, 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial, commercial & undeveloped land Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved
�Wl
and Authorized
µtfor release by City Traffic Engineer*: �
1 I I o l 2-v I f3 r ' .. .,o �, I
* Contract
Ruth Smith,
services
TE,
provided
PTP
by
TE
lnterwest
1650
Consulting Group
Date � Segment#25
Appendix C
992
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
993
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 27
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080

1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
994
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 Yes, decrease 10 mph.
85th percentile speed, Option 1 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2)
Residential
30 - 39 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalks, crosswalks. No bike lanes. On-street parking allowed on both sides except between Montana Way and Limonite Ave on the west side. Pocket park at north end.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-Lane Undivided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Qualifies for additional 5 mph reduction since it meets conditions for CVC 22358.7(a)(2), as shown in CA MUTCD Table 2B-106(CA), with Presence of Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure (sidewalk, crosswalk & nearby signalized intersection on 4-way intersection). Residences do not front onto Harrison Avenue - no direct access. 40 Harrison Ave
Limonite Avenue & Blossom Way
North/South
Traffic Data
3,015
1,100

0.21 1 Lane in Each Direction
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
995
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100

0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
996
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120

1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
997
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.: 31
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070

0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
998
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1 - Pedestrian & bicyclist safety Industrial
44 - 53 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.08

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. Curved alignment.

Comments:

This is a new street segment that was not previously studied. 52 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue & Cucamonga Creek Channel
East/West
Traffic Data
14,735
6,100

1.16 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
999
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Avenue
Cucamonga Creek Channel & Archibald Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
15,549
2,950

0.56 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Commercial / Residential
42 - 51 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. 2-Lane Roundabout midway. Curved alignment.

Comments:

This is a new street segment that was not previously studied.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1 - Pedestrian & bicyclist safety Appendix C
1000
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:

Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•: C ;i,- 1Y
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. H!lt:t s
7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (,
• Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment# Appendix C
1001
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
8/4/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
49 Limonite Avenue
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
East/West
Traffic Data
38,582
8,100

1.53 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Retail & Residential
40-49 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
12 0.28

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing major streets. No Parking allowed.

Roadway Geometrics:
2 or 3 lanes in each direction with painted or raised median. Bike lanes in certain EB sections, Class 2 or 4. For the purposes of the E&TS, use 6-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety. Residences do not front onto Limonite Avenue - no direct access.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2.

Appendix C
1002
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.

Comments:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1003
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1004
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380

0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1005
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970

0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.

Agricultural land west of Hall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1006
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500

0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1007
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 41
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
8/4/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Riverside Drive
Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
East/West
Traffic Data
20,231
2,300

0.44 4-Lane Undivided
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Industrial & Undeveloped Land
36-45 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.46

1.33 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking except where parking is allowed for large trucks on the north side in the dirt shoulder, heavy truck use, no bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Varies 1 to 2 lanes for both directions, with both painted medians and 2-way left turn lanes. Alignment varies with straight sections, but mostly curved.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2.

Appendix C
1008
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1009
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1010
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1011
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040

0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1012
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification: Secondary Collector
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
43 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
North/South
Traffic Data
6,389
3,300

0.63 2 Lanes in Each Direction with 2-Way Left Turn Lane, partial painted median Speed Survey Data
School / Residential
34 - 43 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes, painted shoulders between Orange and Baltimore.

Comments:

High School, intermediate school, elementary school, & public library adjacent to street. Congestion. Meets criteria for CVC 22358.7, in accordance with CA MUTCD Table 2B-106(CA).

Residences do not front onto Scholar Way - no direct access.

Roadway Geometrics:

Primarily 4-Lane Undivided, with Divided section between Citrus St. & Mustang Way. Roadway narrows between Schleisman and Orange.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No Change
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7.

Appendix C
1013
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1014
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700

0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.

Roadway Geometrics:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1015
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 49
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935

1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1016
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 50
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422

1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1017
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisman Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 51
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542

0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Smoke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.

Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
1018
1019

APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated August 2025)

1020

1021

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE

0.49 mi

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET

UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North SCHOLAR WAY JAMESTOWN AVENUE HAMNER AVENUE • 35 MPH Appendix D
1022
Appendix D
1023
Appendix D
1024

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)

0.31 mi

RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North 35 MPH • HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST • 35 MPH Appendix D
1025

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North SUMNER AVENUE SCHOLAR WAY HAMNER AVENUE 68TH STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1026

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
68TH STREET

0.5 mi

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE WELLS SPRING ST I-15 INTERSTATE HWY

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •

WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
Appendix D
1027

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

BLUFF STREET TO WIND RIVER/GRAPEWIN STREET

1.46 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

RIVER STREET

ARCHIBALD
AVENUE

RIVER RD
WIND
BARON
ROAD
BLUFF

GRAPEWIN
STREET
55 MPH •
KENDAL
ROAD
RIVER
ROAD
55 MPH •
• 55 MPH
STREET

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE
Appendix D
1028

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD WIND RIVER RD

GRAPEWIN
STREET

CHANDLER STREET

FIELDMASTER
STREET

SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE

CREEK EASTVALE
PKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
1029

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North INDUSTRIAL

ARCHI BALD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH• 50 MPH
50 MPH • 50 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
Appendix D
1030
Appendix D
1031
Appendix D
1032

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT

0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •

CITY LIMIT BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL INTERSTATE HWY

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
1033

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BLOSSOM WAY

HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.5 mi

BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE CEDAR CREEK ROAD SUMNER AVENUE 30 MPH • • 30 MPH

REDSIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 30 MPH • PINE GROVE PL
Appendix D
1034

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.

HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY
.50 mi

CANTU-GALLEANO
RANCH RD.

COMMERCIAL
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< LIMIT (I-15) HAMN(R A9(NU( LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL GOODMAN RD. &IT< LIMIT
LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL &IT< 2) 2NTARI2 &IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(< • 50 MPH • 50 MPH Appendix D
1035

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HELLMAN AVENUE ARCHIBALD AVENUE HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE

1.53 mi
RESIDENTIAL • 45 MPH

SELBY AVENUE

SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1036

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HARRISON AVENUE SUMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY
0

PL SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •  MPH
SCHOOL =ONE
• 40 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL HIGH SCHOOL
PARK • 40 MPH COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE COBBLE CREEK DRIVE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL Appendix D
1037

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North HAMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
 PL ವ  MP+ SCHOLAR WAY • 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) ವ  MP+ HIGH SCHOOL

RESIDENTIAL

PARK MAYFIELD STREET CARROLLTON PLACE
Appendix D
1038

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North

FIELDMASTER STREET

HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi

RESIDENTIAL

FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
E
K
RD
C
H
E
R
R
Y
MEADOW
BROOK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK

HALL RD

ARCHIBALD AVE
Appendix D
1039

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Goodman Way
Street Segment: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road to Hamner Avenue Segment Length (MI): 0.68 mi
North

GOODMAN WAY

RESIDENTIAL

NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL
• 35 MPH
35 MPH•
35 MPH•
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
1040

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NorthRIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi

CITRUS STREET

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH

FAIR GROUNDS

PARK RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1041

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL 65TH STREET 45 MPH • 45 MPH • 45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
1042

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL
North
HAMNER

HAMNER AVENUE

0.91 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
58TH STREET
• 45 MPH

SWAN LAKE

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED
• 45 MPH
AVENUE
45 MPH •

COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1043
Appendix D
1044

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: HAMNER AVENUE
Street Segment: CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD & RIVERSIDE DRIVE Segment Length (MI): 1.23 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

INDUSTRIAL

INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
VACANT
LAND

UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
1045

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Hamner Avenue
Street Segment: Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street Segment Length (MI): 0.99 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE
SR 60 FREWAY

MISSION BLVD

UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL

COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

UNDEVELOPED

UNDEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL

PHILADELPHIA AVENUE
Appendix D
1046

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI): CHANDLER STREET
North

HARRISON AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH

NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1047
Appendix D
1048
Appendix D
1049

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD TO

0.97 mi

CONSERVATION
AREA

NOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMITS

RIVER ROAD

CHANDLER STREET

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1) 50 MPH •

UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED

CHANDLER STREET
Appendix D
1050

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE CITY LIMIT

CHANDLER STREET

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
UNDEVELOPED 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) • 50 MPH •
SCHOOL

WALTERS STREET ALDERGATE
ROAD

MARKETSTREET

PINE AVENUE PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD LANDERWOOD DRIVE BICKMORE AVENUE

1.54 mi

CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE

LIMONITE AVE

PARK INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL CHINO CORONA ROAD KIMBALL AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1051

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North NOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE

LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT

0.20 mi

HELLMAN AVENUE CHANDLER STREET INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL LIMONITE AVE

INDUSTRIAL SUMMIT DR

INDUSTRIAL HELLMAN AVENU CITY LIMIT ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)

1.54 mi KIMBALL AVENUE

CITY LIMIT INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
1052
Appendix D
1053
Appendix D
1054

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Archibald Avenue to Sumner Avenue
Segment Length (MI): 1 mi
North

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

ONTARIO RANCH ROAD

NOT TO SCALE

SUMNER AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
1055

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Sumner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 1.53 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

AGRICULTURE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH

LIMONITE
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

SUMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH
I-15 FWY

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

UNDEVELOPED

AGRICULTURE
RETAIL
Appendix D
1056

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

MISSION
S. MILLILKEN AVENUE
BLVD

MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS (I-15)

COMMERCIAL
COMMERCIAL 60 MPH •
Appendix D
1057

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

ORANGE STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL

ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •

SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH

SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

AGRICULTURE RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1058

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD

0.26 mi

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1059

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVER ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE

0.75 mi

NOT TO SCALE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

HALL ROAD

AGRICULTURE

AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
1060
Appendix D
1061

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Riverside Drive
Street Segment: Hamner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 0.44 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

HAMNER AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
I-15 FWY
• 50 MPH

MILLIKEN AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
1062

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHI BALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH

CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

COMMERCIAL
Appendix D
1063

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD
SUMNER

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

HARRISON
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL

COMMUNITY
CENTER

AVENUEAVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •45 MPH •
Appendix D
1064

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED 45 MPH •
Appendix D
1065

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE

0.58 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN

HAMMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1066
Appendix D
1067

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

SCHOLAR WAY

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHOLAR

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

LIMONITE AVE
WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
Appendix D
1068
Appendix D
1069

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET

1.12 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER

CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
1070

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

1.03 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE 45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

ORCHARD
PARK

SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
1071

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

WHITEWELL ROAD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

0.29 mi

NOT TO SCALE

WHITEWELL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH

PRAIRIE

SMOKE RD
Appendix D
1072
1073

APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated August 2025)

1074
1075
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 0 0 45 044 0 2 44 X X 2 Time43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:0539 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E33 1 1 33 X X 2 *32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%29 3 1 29 X X X X 428 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%27 1 2 27 X X X 326 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1076
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 8 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 7 2 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 6% 8% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 80% 78% 73%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 6 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 18%
35 0 3 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1077
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:3049 1 2 49 X X X 348 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 736 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%35 0 2 35 X X 234 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 1 1 33 X X 232 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
1078
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:0052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:2049 2 2 49 X X X X 448 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 636 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
1079
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:2552 1 0 52 X 151 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:5049 1 2 49 X X X 348 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 636 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix
E
1080
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 10:0062 0 1 62 X 161 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 3 60 X X X 3 To: 10:2559 1 2 59 X X X 358 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing57 9 4 57 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH56 6 2 56 X X X X X X X X 8 *55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 3 5 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P53 1 6 53 X X X X X X X 7 A52 6 5 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C51 2 1 51 X X X 3 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 4 4 50 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%49 1 3 49 X X X X 4 *48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%47 2 2 47 X X X X 446 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%45 0 1 45 X 144 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH43 0 0 43 042 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 53 MPH 53 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1081
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 1 3 59 X X X X 458 4 0 58 X X X X 457 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 1 56 X 155 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:0552 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:3049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 744 1 3 44 X X X X 443 1 0 43 X 142 1 0 42 X 141 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%39 0 0 39 038 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1082
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Wind River Road / Grapewin Street - Schleisman Road 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:40
62 1 0 62 X 1
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 4 2 60 X X X X X X 6 To: 10:05
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 1 1 58 X X 2 Existing
57 3 2 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5 *
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 P
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 A
52 1 3 52 X X X X 4 C
51 2 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 7 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 12% 13% 49 5 4 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 70%
47 3 2 47 X X X X X 5
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 14% 17%
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH
43 1 1 43 X X 2
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 41 0 1 41 X 1
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 57 MPH 57 MPH 57 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix E
1083
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Baron Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - River Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 1 45 X 144 1 1 44 X X 2 Time43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 9:0042 2 2 42 X X X X 441 0 2 41 X X 2 Time40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *35 6 0 35 X X X X X X 6 *34 2 1 34 X X X 3 *33 6 4 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P32 0 1 32 X 1 A31 8 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 24% 36% 28%29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 7%25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 624 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1084
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 9:2052 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 751 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:4049 0 1 49 X 148 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH46 5 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 P44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 A43 9 8 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C42 4 1 42 X X X X X 5 E41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 *38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%37 2 2 37 X X X X 436 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 10%35 1 1 35 X X 234 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1085
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Bellegrave Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:4062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 10:5559 0 0 59 058 2 0 58 X X 2 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 2 0 56 X X 255 3 2 55 X X X X X 554 0 3 54 X X X 3 *53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 *52 5 6 52 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *51 7 6 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 14% 4% 9%49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 C48 3 6 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % In Pace: 76% 84% 78%47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 6 3 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 10% 12% 13%45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH43 3 2 43 X X X X X 542 1 1 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 1 0 40 X 139 0 1 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 52 MPH 53 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1086
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Blossom Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 0 0 46 045 0 0 45 044 0 0 44 0 Time43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:1042 1 0 42 X 141 1 0 41 X 1 Time40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 12:5039 2 0 39 X X 238 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 Speed Limit: 30 MPH36 2 1 36 X X X 3 *35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *34 6 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 3 2 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 16% 0% 16%29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 76%27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 *26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 22% 8%25 2 2 25 X X X X 424 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH23 1 0 23 X 122 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1087
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - Interstate 15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:20
52 2 1 52 X X X 3
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 11:50
49 3 2 49 X X X X X 5 *
48 4 1 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 3 1 47 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 8 4 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 A
44 5 6 44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 E
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 4 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 12% 16% 10%
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 68% 71%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 3 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 10% 16% 19%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
Appendix E
1088
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Chandler Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Harrison Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 1 57 X 1 Date:56 1 5 56 X X X X X X 655 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:4052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 1 51 X X 2 Time50 4 6 50 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 10:1549 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *48 4 3 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 4 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 A45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 C44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 E43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 24% 19%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 70% 68% 69%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix
E
1089
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 3 1 49 X X X X 4
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 6 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 9 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C
41 5 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 10% 8% 9% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 88% 90% 89%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 2%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/19/22
Appendix E
1090
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Harrison Avenue - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:4052 2 0 52 X X 251 2 0 51 X X 2 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 2:0049 1 1 49 X X 2 *48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing47 6 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 A45 8 9 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 C44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 E43 6 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *42 6 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 0% 5%39 1 1 39 X X 238 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 90% 85%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1091
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fieldmaster Street
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hall Road - Archibald Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 1 0 48 X 147 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:46 0 3 46 X X X 345 3 0 45 X X X 344 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 5 1 43 X X X X X X 6 * From: 1:3042 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 6 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 A To: 2:2039 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C38 8 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 E Existing37 2 5 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 *35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *34 1 0 34 X 133 3 2 33 X X X X X 532 2 0 32 X X 231 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 10%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 74% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 14% 15%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1092
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Goodman Way
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Hamner Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 2 54 X X 2 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 10:40
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:10
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 4 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 2 3 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 4 3 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 0 40 X X X X 4 A % Over Pace: 14% 24% 17%
39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 C
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 E % In Pace: 70% 62% 65%
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 1 3 36 X X X X 4 * % Under Pace: 16% 14% 18%
35 5 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 3 2 34 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 2 0 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 3 30 X X X 3
29 2 0 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
Appendix E
1093
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Citrus Street - South City Limits72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 1:2062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 0 0 60 0 To: 1:4059 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 0 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 0 1 56 X 155 1 0 55 X 154 4 2 54 X X X X X X 653 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 *52 4 2 52 X X X X X X 6 *51 1 2 51 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 2 50 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 2% 8% 9%49 5 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 C % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 E46 8 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * % Under Pace: 18% 8% 11%45 1 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH43 2 3 43 X X X X X 542 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH41 0 3 41 X X X 340 1 0 40 X 139 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH38 0 1 38 X 137 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1094
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 3 1 53 X X X X 4 From: 11:5052 1 2 52 X X X 351 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Time50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 12:1049 2 3 49 X X X X X 5 *48 5 1 48 X X X X X X 6 P Existing47 4 5 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 7 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 8% 10% 9%39 1 2 39 X X X 338 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 74% 75%37 0 0 37 036 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 16%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1095
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 1 54 X 1 Time53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 From: 9:0052 1 3 52 X X X X 451 6 3 51 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time50 0 0 50 0 * To: 9:2049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *48 8 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 5 5 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 E44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 3 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 18% 9%39 2 0 39 X X 238 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 77%37 1 0 37 X 136 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 16% 4% 14%35 1 0 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1096
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Bellegrave Avenue - Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 1:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 1:25
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 3 2 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 P
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 A
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
41 6 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 22% 14% 20% 39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 69%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
1097
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road - Riverside Drive 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:50
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 1 60 X 1 To: 12:15
59 1 0 59 X 1
58 0 0 58 0 Existing
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 1 3 56 X X X X 4
55 2 3 55 X X X X X 5
54 1 3 54 X X X X 4
53 3 0 53 X X X 3
52 3 3 52 X X X X X X 6 *
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 12% 22% 20%
49 6 3 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 A % In Pace: 66% 68% 67%
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 C
46 1 6 46 X X X X X X X 7 E % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 1 1 40 X X 2
39 1 0 39 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 36 0 1 36 X 1
35 0 1 35 X 1 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 55 MPH 54 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
Appendix E
1098
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hamner Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 1 0 64 X 1
63 1 0 63 X 1 Between: Riverside Drive - Philadelphia Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 1 60 X 1 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 2 58 X X X 3
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Date:
56 1 1 56 X X 2
55 2 1 55 X X X 3
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 From: 12:45
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * To: 1:05
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 5 48 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
47 4 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P Speed Limit: N / P MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 A
45 2 0 45 X X 2 C
44 1 0 44 X 1 E
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 0 3 42 X X X 3 *
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Statistics Southbound Statistics Combined Statistics 40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 24% 30% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 62% 56% 59%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 12%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix E
1099
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Chandler Street - Schleisman Road62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 1 58 X 157 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 2 56 X X 255 1 0 55 X 154 0 3 54 X X X 3 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:1052 1 1 52 X X 251 1 4 51 X X X X X 5 * Time50 6 5 50 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * To: 12:3049 8 3 49 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *48 1 2 48 X X X 3 P Existing47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C45 6 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 4% 16% 10%39 0 1 39 X 138 2 0 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 90% 80% 85%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 4% 5%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 50 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
E
1100
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Blossom Way Limonite Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 12:5052 2 0 52 X X 251 0 1 51 X 1 Time50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:2049 4 2 49 X X X X X X 648 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P 43 5 6 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A42 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 C41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 15%39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 * 38 2 6 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
37 2 1 37 X X X 336 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 4% 6%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
E
1101
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Harrison Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Blossom Way
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 From: 11:30
42 2 0 42 X X 2
41 4 2 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 3 0 40 X X X 3 To: 12:20
39 2 1 39 X X X 3 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
36 0 5 36 X X X X X 5 P
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 5 5 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
33 2 3 33 X X X X X 5 E
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 1 3 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 2% 8% 18%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 0 3 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 68% 70% 65%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 30% 22% 17%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 1 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1102
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Chandler Street - River Road72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:1562 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 3 4 60 X X X X X X X 7 To: 12:0059 1 2 59 X X X 358 2 1 58 X X X 3 Existing57 0 0 57 0 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 4 5 56 X X X X X X X X X 9 *55 3 7 55 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *54 4 4 54 X X X X X X X X 8 *53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 P52 4 3 52 X X X X X X X 7 A51 3 8 51 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics50 5 4 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 12% 14% 13%49 6 1 49 X X X X X X X 7 *48 2 4 48 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 76% 82% 79%47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 *46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 4% 8%45 2 0 45 X X 244 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH43 0 1 43 X 142 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 47 - 56 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 56 MPH 56 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1103
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Hellman Avenue
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Scholar Avenue (Chandler Street - Limonite Avenue)72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:0062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:2559 0 1 59 X 158 1 2 58 X X X 3 Existing57 1 0 57 X 1 Speed Limit: 50 MPH56 3 2 56 X X X X X 555 4 2 55 X X X X X X 6 * 54 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 *53 2 2 53 X X X X 4 *52 5 3 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P 51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 C % Over Pace: 8% 16% 12%49 3 5 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E 48 8 3 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 72% 69% 47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 16% 12% 19%
45 1 5 45 X X X X X X 644 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 51 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH43 1 1 43 X X 242 1 4 42 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 46 - 55 MPH41 0 1 41 X 140 0 0 40 039 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 54 MPH 55 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1104
(in Eastvale, btwn Limonite and NCL)
Appendix E
1105
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Cucamonga Creek Channel 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 10:25
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:00
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 3 57 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 0 3 54 X X X 3
53 2 1 53 X X X 3 *
52 2 1 52 X X X 3 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 P % Over Pace: 4% 18% 10%
49 4 4 49 X X X X X X X X 8 A
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % In Pace: 68% 80% 73% 47 4 8 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 28% 2% 17%
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH 43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 3 0 42 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 41 3 1 41 X X X X 4
40 3 0 40 X X X 3
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 38 1 0 38 X 1
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 54 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1106
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Cucamonga Creek Channel - Archibald Avenue 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:05
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 11:25
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 1 57 X 1 Speed Limit: N/P MPH
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 6 2 54 X X X X X X X X 8
53 1 1 53 X X 2
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 4 2 51 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 3 50 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 6% 18% 19%
49 6 4 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 P % In Pace: 74% 68% 66%
47 4 3 47 X X X X X X X 7 A
46 4 5 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Under Pace: 20% 14% 15% 45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 E
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 43 2 4 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 5 42 X X X X X X 6 * Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4
39 0 2 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/20/25
Appendix E
1107
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 2 59 X X 258 0 1 58 X 157 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 1 1 56 X X 255 2 5 55 X X X X X X X 754 4 2 54 X X X X X X 6 * Time53 1 3 53 X X X X 4 * From: 9:4552 1 4 52 X X X X X 5 *51 0 1 51 X 1 P Time50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A To: 10:0549 1 2 49 X X X 3 C48 7 2 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Existing47 8 7 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *45 7 2 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *44 2 3 44 X X X X X 543 1 2 43 X X X 342 1 2 42 X X X 341 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Statistics Westbound Statistics Combined Statistics40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 14%39 1 1 39 X X 238 0 1 38 X 1 % In Pace: 64% 68% 62%37 3 0 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 26% 12% 24%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 45 - 54 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 54 MPH 53 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
6/5/18
Appendix
E
1108
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Limonite Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - East City Limit
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 10:15
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 3 0 51 X X X 3 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:40
49 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7 *
48 5 3 48 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 P
45 4 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 C
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 E
42 4 8 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
41 4 5 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 12% 12% 9%
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5
38 1 4 38 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 76% 82% 78%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 6% 13%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 47 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
Appendix E
1109
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mission Boulevard
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Milliken Avenue - I-15 Freeway
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 2 1 64 X X X 3 Time
63 0 1 63 X 1 From: 9:30
62 0 0 62 0
61 3 2 61 X X X X X 5 Time
60 6 2 60 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 10:30
59 3 1 59 X X X X 4
58 6 2 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
57 2 3 57 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: N / P MPH
56 4 7 56 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
55 4 3 55 X X X X X X X 7 P
54 5 1 54 X X X X X X 6 A
53 5 5 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
52 5 4 52 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
51 3 1 51 X X X X 4 *
50 4 5 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 17%
49 2 4 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 60%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 % Under Pace: 23%
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 53 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 49 - 58 MPH
41 2 0 41 X X 2
40 0 0 40 0
39 2 0 39 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 38 3 0 38 X X X 3
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH
36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 59 MPH
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 75 50 GRAND TOTALS 125
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Eastbound Westbound
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.
6/3/21
Appendix E
1110
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:2052 1 0 52 X 151 1 0 51 X 1 Time50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:1549 0 1 49 X 148 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH46 3 1 46 X X X X 445 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 P41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 10% 12% 13%39 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 74%37 4 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 14% 8% 13%35 0 4 35 X X X X 434 3 1 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH33 1 2 33 X X X 332 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 36 - 45 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 1 30 X 129 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
E
1111
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Prairie Smoke Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Whitewell Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 1 0 47 X 1 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 4 2 45 X X X X X X 644 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time43 0 3 43 X X X 3 From: 9:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:0039 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 * 38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 A
35 1 3 35 X X X X 4 C
34 0 5 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 1 2 33 X X X 3 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 22% 20% 21%29 4 0 29 X X X X 428 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 50% 66% 58%27 2 2 27 X X X X 426 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 28% 14% 21%25 3 0 25 X X X 324 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 31 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
G
1112
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: River Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 9:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 6 51 X X X X X X 6 Time
50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 * To: 9:35
49 3 6 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
48 7 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 P Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 4 46 X X X X X X X X 8 A
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5 C
44 5 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
43 7 3 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 4% 10%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 78% 80% 76%
37 0 1 37 X 1
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 14% 16% 14%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 51 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/14/21
Appendix G
1113
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverboat Drive
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Massy Harris Way - Wells Springs Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 0 Time53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:1052 0 0 52 051 0 2 51 X X 2 Time50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:2049 1 2 49 X X X 348 0 1 48 X 1 Existing47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH 46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 0 45 X 144 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 *41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 A % Over Pace: 12% 12% 12%39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 C 38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 66% 62% 64%
37 9 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 22% 26% 24%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 2 2 33 X X X X 432 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH31 0 1 31 X 130 0 3 30 X X X 329 0 2 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH28 0 0 28 027 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH26 1 0 26 X 125 2 0 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
G
1114
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Riverside Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limit
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 12:15
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 3 0 51 X X X 3 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:00
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 0 3 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 5 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
44 7 4 44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 *
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 P
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 C % Over Pace: 18% 20% 26%
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 E
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 70% 68% 67%
37 3 3 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 12% 12% 7%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 2 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
Appendix G
1115
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
75 0 0 75 074 0 0 74 073 0 0 73 0 Between: Hellman Avenue - Archibald Avenue72 0 0 72 071 0 0 71 070 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear69 0 0 69 068 0 0 68 067 0 0 67 0 Date:66 0 0 66 065 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 0 Time63 0 0 63 0 From: 3:3062 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 0 Time60 2 0 60 X X 2 To: 3:5059 3 2 59 X X X X X 558 1 7 58 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing57 1 2 57 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH 56 6 4 56 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *55 4 0 55 X X X X 4 P 54 2 3 54 X X X X X 5 A53 3 4 53 X X X X X X X 7 C
52 3 7 52 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 7 2 50 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 14% 4% 7%49 3 3 49 X X X X X X 6 * 48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 % In Pace: 70% 70% 66%
47 2 1 47 X X X 346 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 16% 26% 27%45 1 1 45 X X 244 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 52 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH43 2 0 43 X X 242 0 2 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 49 - 58 MPH41 0 0 41 040 0 1 40 X 139 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH38 0 0 38 037 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 51 MPH 52 MPH 52 MPH36 0 0 36 035 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 57 MPH34 0 0 34 033 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 031 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
G
1116
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 2 0 55 X X 254 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:1552 1 3 52 X X X X 451 2 1 51 X X X 3 Time50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 3:3549 2 7 49 X X X X X X X X X 9 * 48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 6 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 P
45 3 4 45 X X X X X X X 7 A44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C 43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 E
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 2% 15%39 2 0 39 X X 238 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 72% 84% 77%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 8%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 40 - 49 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
G
1117
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Scholar Way62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 0 55 054 1 1 54 X X 2 Time53 2 0 53 X X 2 From: 3:3552 0 0 52 051 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:5549 3 1 49 X X X X 448 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing47 7 2 47 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 7 3 46 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P 44 3 4 44 X X X X X X X 7 A43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 8% 16% 15%39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 80% 76% 77%
37 1 2 37 X X X 336 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 8%35 0 1 35 X 134 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
G
1118
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Schleisman Road
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 1 57 X X 2 Date:56 0 0 56 055 0 1 55 X 154 4 1 54 X X X X X 5 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 10:3052 3 1 52 X X X X 451 2 6 51 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time50 4 3 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:5049 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * 48 4 5 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
47 6 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 45 MPH 46 5 3 46 X X X X X X X X 8 C
45 3 6 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5 *42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 2 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 22% 12% 15%39 0 1 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 78% 80% 78%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 7%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 41 - 50 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 42 - 51 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
G
1119
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Street - Schleisman Road
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 1 48 X X 2
47 1 0 47 X 1 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 * From: 10:50
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4 *
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 * Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 P To: 11:40
39 1 1 39 X X 2 A
38 7 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C Existing
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 5 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 *
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5
31 0 1 31 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 32% 6% 10%
29 3 0 29 X X X 3
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 64% 72% 64%
27 0 0 27 0
26 1 2 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 4% 22% 26%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 33 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix G
1120
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Limonite Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 1 48 X 147 1 2 47 X X X 3 Date:46 1 0 46 X 145 1 3 45 X X X X 444 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 * Time43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 * From: 1:2042 2 3 42 X X X X X 5 * 41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 A To: 1:4039 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C 38 3 4 38 X X X X X X X 7 E Existing
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *34 0 4 34 X X X X 4 33 2 1 33 X X X 332 1 1 32 X X 231 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 16% 9%29 2 0 29 X X 228 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 78% 76% 75%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 16%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
G
1121
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Scholar Way
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Limonite Avenue - Bellegrave Avenue52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 2 49 X X 248 0 1 48 X 147 0 1 47 X 1 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 2 2 44 X X X X 4 Time43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 * From: 10:2542 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 * 41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 7 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 11:0039 5 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A 38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 C Existing
37 7 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 *35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *34 5 2 34 X X X X X X X 7 *33 1 0 33 X 1 32 1 3 32 X X X X 431 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%29 0 0 29 028 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 86% 72% 79%27 0 0 27 026 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 6%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix
G
1122
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Street - 65th Street62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 0 0 57 0 Date:56 0 3 56 X X X 355 0 1 55 X 154 0 2 54 X X 2 Time53 1 2 53 X X X 3 From: 2:0052 0 2 52 X X 2 * 51 5 7 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Time
50 3 4 50 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:2049 5 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P 48 6 6 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 C Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 E
45 8 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
44 5 3 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 *42 0 1 42 X 1 41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics40 2 0 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 2% 12% 9%39 1 0 39 X 138 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 86% 76% 81%37 0 0 37 036 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 10%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 47 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 43 - 52 MPH 44 - 53 MPH 43 - 52 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/17/21
Appendix
G
1123
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Sumner Avenue
65 0 0 65 064 0 0 64 063 0 0 63 0 Between: 65th Street - Bellegrave Avenue62 0 0 62 061 0 0 61 060 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear59 0 0 59 058 0 0 58 057 1 0 57 X 1 Date:56 0 0 56 055 1 0 55 X 154 1 0 54 X 1 Time53 3 2 53 X X X X X 5 From: 10:0052 3 2 52 X X X X X 551 3 1 51 X X X X 4 Time50 2 1 50 X X X 3 * To: 10:2549 6 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 * 48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Existing
47 2 5 47 X X X X X X X 7 P Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 A
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 C
44 4 5 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 1 40 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 6% 10% 17%39 2 1 39 X X X 338 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 86% 74%37 0 0 37 036 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 28% 4% 9%35 0 0 35 034 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH33 0 0 33 032 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 44 - 53 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 41 - 50 MPH31 0 0 31 030 0 0 30 029 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH28 0 0 28 027 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH26 0 0 26 025 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 49 MPH 51 MPH24 0 0 24 023 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 021 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 018 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 016 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
G
1124
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Whitewell Road
55 0 0 55 054 0 0 54 053 0 0 53 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Prairie Smoke Road52 0 0 52 051 0 0 51 050 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear49 0 0 49 048 0 0 48 047 0 0 47 0 Date:46 1 2 46 X X X 345 2 2 45 X X X X 444 0 1 44 X 1 Time43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:0042 1 3 42 X X X X 441 0 0 41 0 Time40 6 2 40 X X X X X X X X 8 To: 11:0039 1 2 39 X X X 338 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing37 3 0 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 *35 0 2 35 X X 2 P
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 A33 6 3 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C 32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 10% 36% 25%29 5 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * 28 1 4 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 72% 64% 65%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 426 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 0% 10%25 0 0 25 024 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH23 0 0 23 022 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 29 - 38 MPH21 0 0 21 020 0 0 20 019 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH18 0 0 18 017 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH16 0 0 16 015 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH14 0 0 14 013 0 0 13 012 0 0 12 011 0 0 11 010 0 0 10 0 9 0 0 9 08 0 0 8 07 0 0 7 06 0 0 6 05 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/18/21
Appendix
G
1125

APPENDIX F
Collision Data Table
Updated August 2025
Appendix G
1126
Appendix G
1127
Mid-Block Collisions
58th Street between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1128
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Archibald and Sumner Avenue
January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1129
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1130
Mid-Block Collisions
65th Street between Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1131
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1132
Mid-Block Collisions
68th Street between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1133
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1134
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1135
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road (Page 2) Appendix G
1136
Mid-Block Collisions
Archibald Avenue between Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue/North City Limit January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1137
Mid-Block Collisions
Baron Road between Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1138
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1139
Mid-Block Collisions
Bellegrave Avenue between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1140
Mid-Block Collisions
Blossom Way between Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1141
Mid-Block Collisions
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road between Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1142
Mid-Block Collisions
Chandler Street between Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1143
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1144
Mid-Block Collisions
Citrus Street between Harrison Avenue and Hamner Avenue (Page 2) Appendix G
1145
Mid-Block Collisions
Fieldmaster Street between Hall Road and Archibald Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1146
Mid-Block Collisions
Goodman Avenue between Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1147
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Citrus Street/South City Limit and Schleisman Road January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1148
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1149
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 2) Appendix G
1150
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue (Page 3) Appendix G
1151
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1152
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 2) Appendix G
1153
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 3) Appendix G
1154
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue (Page 4) Appendix G
1155
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1156
Mid-Block Collisions
Hamner Avenue between Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1157
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Chandler Street and Schleisman Road January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1158
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1159
Mid-Block Collisions
Harrison Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1160
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Chandler Street and River Road
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1161
Mid-Block Collisions
Hellman Avenue between Schleisman Road and Chandler Street January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1162
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Hellman Avenue and Cucamonga Creek Channel January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1163
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Cucamonga Creek Channel and Archibald Avenue January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1164
Mid-Block Collisions
Limonite Avenue between Sumner Avenue and East City Limit January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1165
Mid-Block Collisions
Mission Boulevard between S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1166
Mid-Block Collisions
Orange Street between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1167
Mid-Block Collisions
Prairie Smoke Road between Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1168
Mid-Block Collisions
River Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1169
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverboat Drive between Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1170
Mid-Block Collisions
Riverside Drive between Hamner Avenue and East City Limit January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1171
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1172
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 2) Appendix G
1173
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue (Page 3) Appendix G
1174
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1175
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1176
Mid-Block Collisions
Schleisman Road between Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1177
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Citrus Street and Schleisman Road
January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2024
Source: California Crash Reporting System (CCRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1178
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1179
Mid-Block Collisions
Scholar Way between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1180
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between Citrus Street and 65th Street
January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP No Relevant Collisions Found.

Appendix G
1181
Mid-Block Collisions
Sumner Avenue between 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1182
Mid-Block Collisions
Whitewell Road between Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road January 1, 2018 – December 31, 2021
Source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), maintained by CA CHP Appendix G
1183

APPENDIX G
Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications
(Updated August 2025)
Appendix G
1184
Appendix G
1185
Appendix G
1186
Appendix G
1187
Appendix G
1188
Appendix G
1189
Appendix G
1190
Appendix G
1191
Appendix G
1192
Appendix G
1193
Appendix G
1194
Appendix G
1195
Appendix G
1196
Appendix G
1197
Appendix G
1198
Appendix G
1199
Appendix G
1200
Appendix G
1201
Appendix G
1202
Appendix G
1203
Appendix G
1204
Appendix G
1205
Appendix G
1206
Appendix G
1207

AGENDA STAFF REPORT
City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting

CITY COUNCIL/EASTVALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY BUSINESS Agenda Item No. 13.3
August 13, 2025
Tree Protection and Preservation
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends the City Council receive a presenta on and provide feedback on the protec on, removal, and maintenance of designated trees within Eastvale.

Summary
Presenta on to City Council regarding the proposed updates to the protec on, removal, and maintenance of designated trees within Eastvale. The updates were developed based on feedback from the City Council on December 11, 2024, regarding tree plan ng in the public right-of-way. The key areas of feedback included:

Notification and Replacement of Removed Trees
Trimming Frequency Standards
Tree Type and Size for New/Replaced Trees
Cost-Effectiveness and Tree Survival
Background
Staff is reques ng that the City Council provide feedback. The next steps are to incorporate the Council's feedback, develop an ordinance and implementa on and funding plan, and then return for final action.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1208
Environmental
Not applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A | Target #: N/A | Goal #: N/A Not applicable.

Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
December 11, 2024 – City Council provided feedback with respect to tree plan ng in the public right of way.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Tree Protection Preservation Presentation 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 | eastvaleca.gov
1209
Date: August 13, 2025
Presented by: Jimmy Chung
Tree Protection & Preservation
1210
Overview – Set clear standards for the protection, removal, and maintenance of designated trees within Eastvale
December 11, 2024 – City Council provided feedback with respect to tree planting in the public right of way
Key areas of feedback included:
• Notification and replacement of removed trees
• Trimming frequency standards
• Tree type and size for new/replaced trees
• Concerns regarding cost-effectiveness and tree survival Tree Protection and Preservation
1211
Tree Replacement:
• Clear Timing for Replacement: All Protected Trees removed must be replaced at a 2:1 ratio within 1-year of removal, unless approved by a certified Arborist • Project Closeout & Monitoring: Replacement is tied to project closeout and verified at final inspection, with annual inspections to ensure tree survival Damage-Specific Protocols:
• City-Caused Damage: Specific response and replacement timeline will be implemented by City Engineer
• Third-Party Damage: If damage occurs without a permit, the City may require replacement within 45–90 days
Notification & Replacement of Removed Trees
1212
Exemptions:
• Defined Trimming Cycle: Routine pruning of City-owned trees follows a 3-year trimming cycle, adhering to ANSI A300 Pruning Standards
• Professional Discretion: Trimming frequency may be adjusted by a certified Arborist or City Engineer based on species-specific growth characteristics Trimming Frequency Standards
1213
Tree Replacement:
• Baseline Standards: Replacement trees must be a minimum 36-inch box size and 12 feet tall, or meet tiered standards based on the mature height of adjacent trees • Tree Removal & Replacement Criteria: Evaluation will consider the tree’s size and site conditions, with arborist-recommended trunk sizes guiding replacement viability Tree Type & Size for New/Replaced Trees
1214
Replacement Timeline:
• Warranty Standards: All new tree plantings require a one (1) year warranty period to ensure survival, per industry standards
• Follow-Up Inspections: City will conduct inspections during and after the warranty period to verify tree survival
• Mitigation Fund Use: Tree fund expenditures support cost-effective planting strategies and tree installation on public rights-of-way, parks, or City-owned property, especially where on-site replacement is not feasible
Cost-Effectiveness & Tree Survival
1215
Guidelines and Resources:
• Dedicated Resource Section: New section added to direct residents to industry-standard tree care guidelines
• Focus on Best Practices: Provides access to reputable resources on tree maintenance, planting, and care, aligned with standards like ANSI A300
General Tree Care
1216
Staff requests City Council to:
• Provide feedback on the proposed updates to the standards for the protection, removal, and maintenance of designated trees within Eastvale
Next Steps:
• Incorporate Council feedback
• Develop implementation and funding plan
• Return for final action
Recommendation & Next Steps
1217
QUESTIONS?
1218