Agenda packet — Eastvale City Council, February 25, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752
Regular City Council Meeting:
6:30 PM
Wednesday, February 25, 2026

City Councilmembers
Jocelyn Yow, Mayor
Clint Lorimore, Mayor Pro Tem
Christian Dinco, Councilmember
Michael McMinn, Councilmember
Todd Rigby, Councilmember

Mark Orme, City Manager
Erica Vega, City Attorney
Marc Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk
This Agenda contains a brief general descrip)on of each item to be considered. Except as otherwise provided by law, no ac)on or direc)on shall be taken on any item not appearing on the following Agenda. Unless legally privileged, all suppor)ng documents, including staﬀ reports, and any wri)ngs or documents provided to a majority of the City Council a/er the pos)ng of this agenda are available for review at Eastvale City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Eastvale, CA 91752 or you may contact the City Clerk’s Oﬃce, at (951) 361-0900 Monday through Thursday from 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and available online at www.eastvaleca.gov
.

Members of the public can observe the mee)ng by viewing the live-stream at www.eastvaleca.gov
and may provide public
comment by sending comments to the City Clerk's Oﬃce by email at [email protected]
. Staﬀ will monitor emails to the
extent possible during the mee)ng and provide comments as possible. All comments will be made part of the record. Comments will then be read into the record, with a maximum allowance of 3 minutes per individual comment, subject to the Mayor’s discre)on to reduce )me on public comment. All comments should be a maximum of 500 words, which corresponds to approximately 3 minutes of speaking )me. If a comment is received before the agenda item is heard but before the close of the mee)ng, the comment will all be included as a part of the record of the meeting but will not be read into the record.

If you are a person with a disability and need an accommoda)on to par)cipate in the City of Eastvale programs, services, ac)vi)es, and mee)ngs, contact Maricela Mejia at
[email protected]
or (951)703-4433 at least 72 business hours in advance
to request an auxiliary aid or accommodation.

Regular mee)ngs are recorded and made available on the City’s website at www.eastvaleca.gov
. Mee)ng recordings are uploaded
to the City’s website within 24 hours (unless otherwise noted) after the completion of the meeting. 1 1.

CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT

Any member of the public may address the Council on items within the Council’s subject maer jurisdicon, but which are not listed on this agenda during PUBLIC COMMENTS. However, no acon may be taken on maers that are not part of the posted agenda. We request comments made on the agenda be made at the me the item is considered and that comments be limited to three minutes per person with a maximum of six minutes (me may be donated by one person). Please address your comments to the Council and do not engaged in dialogue with individual Council Members, City staﬀ, or members of the audience. Blue speaker forms are available at the front table to the entrance of Council Chambers.

4. CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

5. INVOCATION

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS

The City Council may only add an item to the Agenda a2er making a ﬁnding that there is a need to take immediate acon on the item and that the item came to the aenon of the agency subsequent to the posng of the agenda. An acon adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Council. If there is less than 2/3 of the Council members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of each section unless otherwise noted.

8. PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS

8.1. Introduction of Lt. Adam Ball

8.2. Black History Month Proclamation

8.3. Eagle Scout Recognitions

9. AGENCY PARTNER UPDATES

9.1. YMCA Update

9.2. Eastvale Library Update

9.3. Youth Council Update

2 10.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Any member of the public may address the Council on items within the Council’s subject maer jurisdicon, but which are not listed on this agenda during PUBLIC COMMENTS. However, no acon may be taken on maers that are not part of the posted agenda. We request comments made on the agenda be made at the me the item is considered and that comments be limited to three minutes per person with a maximum of six minutes (me may be donated by one person). Please address your comments to the Council and do not engaged in dialogue with individual Councilmembers, City staﬀ, or members of the audience. Blue speaker forms are available at the front table to the entrance of Council Chambers.

11. CONSENT CALENDAR

Consent Calendar items are normally enacted in one moon. The Mayor or City Council may remove a Consent Calendar item for separate acon. If a member of the public would like to speak on a Consent Calendar item, please complete a blue “Public Comment Form” and submit to the City Clerk prior to the item.

11.1. City Council Meeting Minutes

Submitted by: Marc A. Donohue, Government Services Director/City Clerk

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the meeting minutes from the regular meeting on February 11, 2026.

11.2. Planning Division Update

Submitted by: David Murray, City Planner

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Planning Division Update.

11.3. Public Works Department Update

Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Public Works Department update.

11.4. Treasurer’s Report: January 2026

Submitted by: Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer’s Report.

11.5. City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – December 2025

Submitted by: Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Eastvale Crime Statistics for December 2025.

3 11.6.

Approval of Letters of Support for the City of Eastvale’s FY 2026-2027 Congressional Community Project Funding Requests

Submitted by: Alexander Fung, Economic Development Manager

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council approve letters supporting the submittal of three FY 2026-2027 Congressional Community Project Funding Requests.

11.7. First Amendment to contract with Geocon West, Inc. for the Eastvale Civic Center project

Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Geocon West, Inc. for providing geotechnical observation and testing services for the Eastvale Civic Center project, increasing the total contract amount by $136,390 and amending the total compensation not-to-exceed amount to $268,160; and
2 .

Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS

The public is encouraged to express your views on any maer set for public hearing. It is our procedure to ﬁrst receive the staﬀ report, then to ask for public tesmony, ﬁrst from those in favor of the project followed by tesmony from those in opposion to it, and if there is opposion, to allow those in favor, rebual tesmony only as to the points brought up in opposion. To tesfy on the maer, you need to simply come forward to the speaker’s podium at the appropriate me, give your name and address and make your statement. A2er a hearing is closed, you may not further speak on the maer unless requested to do so or are asked quesons by the Mayor or a Councilmember. Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes each with a maximum of six (6) minutes (time may be donated by one speaker.)

13. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

13.1. Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets

Submitted by: Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer

RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance entitled:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE

MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS

14. CITY MANAGER/CITY STAFF REPORT

4 15.

CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMITTEE REPORTS

16. ADJOURNMENT

The next regular mee)ng of the Eastvale City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. at Eastvale City Hall Council Chambers, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900, Eastvale, CA 91752.

17. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing Agenda was posted at the following locations: City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910 and website of the City of Eastvale (
www.eastvaleca.gov
,) not less than 72 hours
prior to the meeting.

______________________________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk

5 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
February 11, 2026 Page - 1

MINUTES

CITY OF EASTVALE

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Regular Meeting: 6:30 PM

City Hall Council Chambers
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 900
Eastvale, CA 91752

1. CALL TO ORDER

The regular meeting of the Eastvale City Council Meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Yow.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Councilmembers Christian Dinco, Mike McMinn , Mayor Pro Tem Clint Lorimore , and Mayor Jocelyn Yow.

Absent:

City Staff

Present: City Manager Mark Orme, City Attorney Erica Vega, and Government Services Director/City Clerk Marc Donohue were present at Roll Call. Other staff members were present.

3. CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT – None

4. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS – None

5. INVOCATION

Bobby Anderson from Friends Church Eastvale offered the invocation.

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Councilmember Rigby led the Pledge of Allegiance.

7. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS
City staff requested to move item 8.4 - Black History Month Proclamation to the next City Council meeting on February 25, 2026.
6 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
February 11, 2026 Page - 2
There was a consensus to move the item to the next meeting.

8. PRESENTATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS

8.1 Recognition of Deputy Cameron Alvarez and Community Services Officer Genesis Oliver

Deputy Alvarez and Community Services Officer Oliver were introduced.

8.2 Introduction of Fire Chief Robert Fish

Fire Chief Robert Fish was introduced.

8.3 Cal Fire Lifesaving Recognition

Certificates were presented to firefighters, paramedics, dispatchers, and a community member for their coordinated lifesaving efforts.

9. AGENCY PARTNER UPDATES – None

10. PUBLIC COMMENT

The following individual provided public comment:

 Aidan Hernandez

11. CONSENT CALENDAR

On motion of Councilmember Rigby second by Councilmember McMinn, the City Council voted unanimously to approve the Consent Calendar.

11.1 City Council Meeting Minutes
The City Council approve d the City Council/Eastvale Public Financing Authority Meeting minutes from the regular meeting on January 28, 2026.

11.2 Approval of Professional Services Agreement with California Culture Festival, LLC for Vendor Sales and Operations Services

The City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into an agreement with California Cultural Festivals, LLC, for the management of retail and food vendor operations during the Eastvale Lantern Festival, at no direct cost to the City, for a term of one year, subject to the terms and conditions as outlined in the agreement.

11.3 Approval of Payment for the Annual Permit Fees to State Water Resources Control Board for Fiscal Year 2025/2026

7 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
February 11, 2026 Page - 3
The City Council approved payment to State Water Resources Control Board for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Annual Permit.

11.4 Accounts Payable and Purchasing Management Software Professional Services Agreement with Concur Technologies, Inc.

The City Council:

1. Approved a Software Services Agreement renewal with Concur Technologies, Inc. for accounts payable and purchasing manag ement software and related professional services for a three -year term expiring on March 31, 2029, with the option to renew annually for two additional one -year terms, in an amount not to exceed $35,000 per fiscal year; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement.

11.5 PLN25-20068 Goodman Commerce Center at Eastvale Specific Plan Amendment (Second Reading)

The City Council adopted Ordinance 26-02 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 AND APPENDIX B OF THE

GOODMAN COMMERCE CENTER AT EASTVALE SPECIFIC PLAN COVERING APPROXIMATELY 205 ACRES OF THE REAL PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY NORTH OF BELLEGRAVE

AVENUE, SOUTH OF CANTU -GALLEANO RANCH ROAD, EAST OF HAMNER AVENUE, AND WEST OF I-15, BORDERED BY THE CITY OF ONTARIO TO THE WEST.

11.6 Designation of Banking Signatories for Citizens Business Bank

The City Council adopted Resolution 26-04, designating banking signatories with Citizen Business Bank.

11.7 Construction Contract Award to Onyx Paving Company Inc. for 2025 Annual Asphalt Concrete Overlay Project

The City Council:

1. Approved the construction contract with Onyx Paving Company, the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, in accordance with unit bid prices in the amount of $2,194,000 plus 20% contingency of $438,800 for the not -to-exceed total of $2,632,800 for the 2025 Annual Asphalt Concrete Overlay Project; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute all necessary documents including Notice of Completion; and

3. Authorized City Staff to file a Notice of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act.

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS – None

13. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
8 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
February 11, 2026 Page - 4

13.1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Mid-Year Budget Review

Finance Director/City Treasurer Wells presented the item and answered related questions.

Mayor Yow opened the public comment period. Hearing no response, Mayor Yow closed the public comment period.

On motion of Councilmember Rigby and second by Mayor Pro Tem Lorimore, the City Council voted unanimously to:

1. Approve and adopt Resolution 26-05, approving Mid-Year Budget Appropriations and Amending the 2025-26 Fiscal Year Capital Improvement Plan and Budget; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute all documents and take all actions necessary to implement the above approvals.

14. CITY MANAGER/CITY STAFF REPORT

City Manager Orme provided an update on upcoming City events.

15. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMITTEE REPORTS

15.1 League of California Cities
Mayor Yow provided a report.

15.2 Southern California Association of Governments
Mayor Pro Tem Lorimore provided a report.

15.3 Western Riverside Council of Governments
No report was provided.

15.4 Riverside Transit Agency
Mayor Yow provided a report.

15.5 Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District
No report was provided.

15.6 Riverside County Transportation Commission
Mayor Pro Tem Lorimore provided a report.

15.7 Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority No report was provided.

9 Eastvale City Council Meeting Minutes
February 11, 2026 Page - 5

15.8 Finance Committee
No report was provided.

15.9 Eastvale Schools Committee
No report was provided.

15.10 Business and Development Success Ad-Hoc Committee No report was provided.

15.11 Eastvale Legislative Ad-Hoc Committee
No report was provided.

15.12 Eastvale Community Services Ad-Hoc Committee
No report was provided.

15.13 City Council Communications

The City Council provided comments.

ADJOURNMENT – Mayor Yow adjourned the regular meeting at 7:44 P.M. The next regular meeting of the Eastvale City Council is scheduled for Wednesday, February 25, 2026, at 6:30 P.M.

Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk
10 AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.2
February 25, 2026
Planning Division Update
Prepared By:

David Murray, City Planner
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Planning Division Update.

Summary
Planning projects are provided in the a
ached Planning Project Status list. The list provides a brief summary and status of each project. New informa#on is highlighted in yellow. A map iden#fying the locations of each project is also included.

Background
The purpose of the Planning Division Update is to provide a list of the current status of major projects in the City of Eastvale.

Environmental
The following update requires no environmental review as it is not considered a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
The following update has no applicable fiscal impacts.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
11 Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment - Planning Division Update

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
12 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
March 16, 2022

Major Projects
Summary
February 25, 2026
City of Eastvale Planning Division
13 Planning Division Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

Contents
IN-PROCESS/REVIEW ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 SUMNER PLACE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (MAP ID: SMNR) ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP PHASE C (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ............................................................................................................................................... 3 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL OVERALL PHASE C OFFSITE (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-7B (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-7C (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-12A (MAP ID: LEAL.2) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-12B (MAP ID: LEAL.2) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-12C (MAP ID: LEAL.2) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-13A (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-13B (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL DR PA-13C (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 EASTVALE CARE FACILITY (SELBY) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL.................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 SRI JAYARAM TEMPLE SELBY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 WIRELESS FACILITY – 7250 COBBLE CREEK .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 APPROVED/ ENTITLED ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 17 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PHASE A TTM (MAP ID: LEAL.1) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 17 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL OVERALL PHASE A DR (MAP ID: LEAL.2) ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-1 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.3) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 19 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-6 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.4) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-7A PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.5)................................................................................................................................................................... 21 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-8 PHASE A (MAP ID: LEAL.6) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 22 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-2 QUARTERRA (MAP ID: LEAL.7) ................................................................................................................................................................ 23 NEW HOME RECREATION CENTER .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 NEW HOME TTM 38595 PHASE B ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 NEW HOME OFF-SITE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-9 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 27 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11A ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11B ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 14 Planning Division Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-11C ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 LEAL RANCH RESIDENTIAL PA-4 QUARTERRA PHASE II ............................................................................................................................................................................... 31 RICHMOND AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL (FORMERLY WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL) ............................................................................................................................................... 32 GOODMAN COMMERCE CENTER (MAP ID: GCC) ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 GCC CR-1 Chili’s Alcohol CUP and VAR (MAP ID: GCC.13) .......................................................................................................................................................... 34 NEW RESTAURANT SHELL (CR-1) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 GCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM (MAP ID: GCC.15) ................................................................................................................................................................ 36 TEAM UP ARENA ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 37 ALL-MAGIC ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 HAMNER PLACE PAD-2 (MAP ID: HPLC.4) ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 39 THE RANCH (MAP ID: RNCH) .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 BEYOND FOOD MART AT THE RANCH (MAP ID: RNCH.5) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 41 THE RANCH TPM NO. 38114 (MAP ID: RNCH.6) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 Hotel Suites (HPLC.1) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 Hamner Place Retail Suites D.R (HPLC.3) ................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 The Merge (MAP ID: MRG) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 WALMART (MAP ID: WMT) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 MISTER CARWASH (MAP ID: WMT) ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 MCDONANLDS (MAP ID: WMT) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 BETTER BUZZ (MAP ID: WMT) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 49 DUNKIN DONUTS AND CARWASH DR AND CUP (MAP ID: DUNK) .............................................................................................................................................................. 50 CHERRY TREE RESIDENTIAL .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 OASIS RESIDENTIAL .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 52 ARCHIBALD AND CHANDLER RETAIL (MAP ID: ACR) ................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 MAGNOLIA RANCH .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 54 ST. OSCAR ROMERO MODULAR BUILDINGS .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 FUTURE .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 THE LEAL PLAN (MAP ID: LEAL) ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 15 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

1 16
Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

2 In-Process/Review
Sumner Place Residential Development (MAP ID: SMNR)
Project: Sumner Place Residential Development Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ The project was deemed complete and is scheduled for the February 18, 2026 Planning Commission.

Project No. PLN25-20005_GPA001_DR001_COZ001_ TTM
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Sumner Ave. and Schleisman Rd.; (Assessor Parcel Number: 152-040-01)
Project
Description:

General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Commercial Retail (CR 0.20-0.35 FAR) to Multi-Family-Low-Moderate (MF-LM 20.1-40 du/acre).

Change of Zone to change the zone from Heavy Agriculture (A-2) to General Residential (R-3).

Major Development Review for the development of a for-sale town home residential project consisting of 159-units on 7.5 acres.

Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 1.30.25
 An incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 2.26.25.  On 9.11.25 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 A second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 10.9.25.  On 1.21.26 a scheduled Workshop for the Planning Commission Meeting to introduce the revised project and solicit feedback prior to formal hearing.

17 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

3 Leal Ranch Residential Tentative Tract Map Phase C (MAP ID: LEAL.2) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Tentative Tract Map 38596 (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20086 TTM New Home Phase C
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map 38596 a request to subdivide 44.34 acres into 73 lots for condominium purposes and 12 lettered lots for open space and street purposes.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.29.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

18 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

4 Leal Ranch Residential Overall Phase C Offsite (MAP ID: LEAL.2) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Offsite (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20087 MDR New Home Phase C Offsites
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the overall New Home Phase C Residential Development and associated site improvements of PA-7B, PA-7C, PA-12A, PA-12B, PA-12C, PA-13A, PA-13B and PA-13C of the Leal Ranch Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

19 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

5 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-7B (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-7B (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20088 DR PA-7B
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 72 multifamily (6-plex) residential units within Planning Area 7B of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

20 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

6 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-7C (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-7C (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20089 DR PA-7C
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 80 single family attached residential units within Planning Area 7C of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

21 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

7 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-12A (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-12A (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20090 DR PA-12A
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 72 single family detached residential units within Planning Area 12A of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

22 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

8 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-12B (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-12B (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20091 DR PA-12B
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 87 single family attached residential units within Planning Area - 12B of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

23 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

9 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-12C (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-12C (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20092 DR PA-12C
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 73 single family detached residential units within Planning Area - 12C of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

24 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

10 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-13A (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-13A (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20093 DR PA-13A
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 64 single family detached residential units within Planning Area 13A of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

25 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

11 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-13B (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-13B (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20094 DR PA-13B
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 32 single family detached residential units within Planning Area 13B of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

26 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

12 Leal Ranch Residential DR PA-13C (MAP ID: LEAL.2)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-13C (Phase C) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On January 27, 2026 the project was resubmitted and is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20095 DR PA-13C
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and master architecture of 49 single family detached residential units within Planning Area 13C of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 10.23.25
 On 11.20.25 the applicant received the first incomplete letter.

27 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

13 Eastvale Care Facility (Selby)
Project: Eastvale Care Facility Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 1.28.25 the applicant received an incomplete letter, and the Planning Division is awaiting resubmittal.

Project No. PLN24-20047 DR003 CUP003
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Walters St. & Selby Ave.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development
congregate care facility consisting of two single family homes.

Conditional Use Permit for the allowance of a residential care facility for the elderly for up to 14 persons per home (28 max).

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 6.20.24
 An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 7.11.24  Resubmittal received on 12.30.24

N
28 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

14 Warmington Residential
Project: Warmington Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ The applicant resubmitted the project on 1.26.2026 and the project is currently under review.

Project No. PLN25-20102 TTM DR
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Walters Street.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map 39416 to subdivide four (4) existing parcels into 35 single family residential lots and two (2) lettered lots.

Major Development Review to establish the site planning and master architecture of a new 35 single family detached residential community with two (2) units set aside for very low-income.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.2.25.
 An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 12.17.25

29 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

15 Sri Jayaram Temple Selby
Project: Sri Jayaram Temple Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 1.6.26 a fourth incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant and currently awaiting resubmittal.

Project No. PLN25-20061 DR
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Selby Avenue and Chandler Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the construction and operation of a 11,973 square foot one-story place of worship and accessory restroom and dining area with ancillary parking.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 8.14.25.
 On 8.20.25 the applicant was sent an incomplete letter  On 9.8.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for review.  On 9.25.2 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 11.24.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for review.  On 12.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 12.19.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for review.

30 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

16 Wireless Facility – 7250 Cobble Creek
Project: Providence Ranch Monopine Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 11.20.24 the Planning Commission continued the project off calendar.

The Planning Division is waiting for a resubmittal.

Project No. PLN24-20030 MDR010
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Hallow Brook Way and Westerly Way . East of Cobble Creek
Project
Description:

Minor Development Review for the development of an unmanned telecom facility consisting of 70 ft. tall monopine 14 panel antennas mounted on the monopine, 35 RRUs mounted behind the antennas, and necessary equipment area.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 4.30.24
 The project was scheduled for planning commission on 6.19.24.  On 6.19.24 the planning commission continued the project to a future date.  A second submittal was submitted for review.
 The project was scheduled for planning commission on 11.20.24.

31 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

17 Approved/ Entitled
Leal Ranch Residential Phase A TTM (MAP ID: LEAL.1)
Project: Leal Ranch Residential Tentative Tract Map (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20087 TTM No. 38594
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map to create 64 lots over 69.8 acres of land to facilitate various site improvements and initiate the residential development of PA-1, PA-6, PA-7A, and PA-8 of the Leal Ranch Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20087 and is subject to conditions of approval.

32 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

18 Leal Ranch Residential Overall Phase A DR (MAP ID: LEAL.2) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Overall DR (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20088 DR006
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the overall Leal Phase A Residential Development and associated site improvements (PA-1, PA-6, PA-7A, and PA-8)

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20087 and is subject to conditions of approval.

33 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

19 Leal Ranch Residential PA-1 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.3) Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-1 (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20089 DR007
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Scholar Way.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 168 new residential units within Planning Area 1 of the Leal Master Plan. Plan types will consist of townhomes (10 plex and 11 plex).

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20089 and is subject to conditions of approval.

34 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

20 Leal Ranch Residential PA-6 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.4) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area- 6 (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20090 DR008
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 102 new residential units within Planning Area 6 of the Leal Master Plan. Plan types will consist of townhomes (Duplex to 6 plex).

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20090 and is subject to conditions of approval.

35 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

21 Leal Ranch Residential PA-7A Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.5) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area-7A (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20091 DR009
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Scholar Way.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 94 single family residential units within Planning Area-7A of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20091 and is subject to conditions of approval.

36 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

22 Leal Ranch Residential PA-8 Phase A (MAP ID: LEAL.6) Project: Leal Ranch Residential Planning Area 8 (Phase A) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Models are open to the public.
▪ Production units are actively under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20092 DR010
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 74 single family residential units within Planning Area 8 of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 12.21.22
 Application deemed incomplete by staff on January 12, 2023.  The project was resubmitted on 06.05.2023 and is under review.  Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023.
 Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
 Planning Commission approval on October 18, 2023
 On October 18, 2023, Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN22- 20092 and is subject to conditions of approval.

37 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

23 Leal Ranch Residential PA-2 Quarterra (MAP ID: LEAL.7) Project: Leal Ranch Residential PA-2 Quarterra Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Construction document have been submitted with the Building Division and are currently under review.

Project No. PLN23-20036 DR006
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and of Scholar Way. South of 58th St.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 320 new residential units within Planning Area 2 of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Received application on June 9, 2023.
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 3, 2023
▪ Application was resubmitted on August 31, 2023
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on September 27, 2023 ▪ Application was resubmitted on November 14, 2023
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on December 7, 2023 ▪ Application was resubmitted on January 18, 2024
▪ Planning Commission approval on February 21, 2024
▪ On February 21, 2024, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23-20036, with conditions of Approval.

38 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

24 New Home Recreation Center
Project: New Home Rec Center Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN24-20075 MDR014
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and of Scholar Way. South of 58th St.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the site planning and architecture of the proposed recreation center within the Leal Ranch Master plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.18.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  The project was resubmitted on 10.24.24
 On 11.20.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  The project was deemed complete and scheduled for planning commission for

2.19.25.  On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20075 and is subject to conditions of approval.

39 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

25 New Home TTM 38595 Phase B
Project: Tentative Tract Map Phase B Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On February 19, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20074 and is subject to conditions of approval.

Project No. PLN24-20074 TTM #38594 PH B
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map for the development of an existing lot into 46 total lots for condominium purposes (37 residential, 1 commercial, 3 for open space and 5 for private street purposes) of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 9, 10, 11A, 11B, and 11C of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.18.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  The project was resubmitted on 10.24.24
 On 11.6.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  The project was resubmitted on 12.11.24
 The project was deemed complete and is currently scheduled for planning commission on 2.19.25

40 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

26 New Home Off-site
Project: Tentative Tract Map Phase B Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 3.19.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20069 and is subject to conditions of approval.

Project No. PLN24-20069 DR004
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review to establish the off-site streets and layout of Phase B of the Leal Master Plan.

41 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

27 Leal Ranch Residential PA-9
Project: Planning Area 9 Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.
▪ The Model Homes are currently open.

Project No. PLN24-20070 DR005
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 90 residential units (triplexes) on Lots 30-36 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 9 of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review.  On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
 The item was heard by Planning Commission on March 19, 2025 and was continued to the following meeting date of April 16,2025.  On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20070 and is subject to conditions of approval.

42 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

28 Leal Ranch Residential PA-11A
Project: Planning Area 11A Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN24-20071 DR006
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 91 residential units (duplexes and triplexes) on lot 1-9 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11A of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review.  On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
 On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20071 and is subject to conditions of approval.

43 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

29 Leal Ranch Residential PA-11B
Project: Planning Area 11B Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN24-20072 DR007
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 90 residential units (6-plex and 8-plexes) on Lots 10-18 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11B of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review.  On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
 On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20072 and is subject to conditions of approval.

44 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

30 Leal Ranch Residential PA-11C
Project: Planning Area 11C Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Actively under construction.

Project No. PLN24-20073 DR008
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 63 residential units (triplexes) on Lots 19-29 of TTM 38595 within Planning Area 11C of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 8.21.24
 On 9.16.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 11.20.24 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 On 12.11.24 a second incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 1.16.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for plan review.  On 2.10.25 a third incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 2.18.25 the applicant resubmitted the project and is currently under review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
 On 4.16.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20073 and is subject to conditions of approval.

45 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

31 Leal Ranch Residential PA-4 Quarterra Phase II
Project: Planning Area 4 Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 5.21.2025 the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20035 and is subject to conditions of approval.

Project No. PLN24-20035 DR001
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Limonite Avenue and 58th Street.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of 360 multi-family residential units on 10.6 acres within Planning Areas 4 & 10 of the Leal Master Plan.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 5.7.24
 An incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 6.3.24  On 7.24.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review.  A second incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 8.12.24  On 10.14.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review.  A third incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 11.7.24  On 12.19.24 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review.  A fourth incomplete letter was sent to applicant on 1.16.25  On 4.7.25 the applicant resubmitted to the planning division for review.  The project was scheduled for Planning Commission on the date of 5.21.25.

46 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

32 Richmond American Residential (formerly Warmington Residential) Project: Warmington Residential Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On 05.28.2025 City Council approved entitlements for PLN24-20053 and is subject to conditions of approval.

Project No. PLN24-20053 TTM001 DR003 SB330
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Grapewin St. & Archibald Ave.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map for 76 lots for a single family home community.

Major Development Review for the development of 76
single-family residential units.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 6.27.24
 An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 7.10.24 documents were resubmitted
 A second incomplete letter has been sent to applicant on 8.06.24  A third incomplete letter has been sent to applicant on 10.17.24  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for Planning Commission date of March 19, 2025
 The project was heard by the Planning Commission on 3.19.25 meeting and recommended to the City Council for approval.  The project was heard by the City Council on 4.23.25 where action was to continue the project for the next scheduled City Council date on May 28, 2025.

N
47 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

33 Goodman Commerce Center (MAP ID: GCC)
Project: Goodman Commerce Center (formally Lewis Eastvale Commerce Center) Project Map:

Current Status:
 Various buildings complete, operating and under
construction.

Project No. 11-0271 **see related projects below
Project
Location:
190 acres +/- fronting on Hamner Ave. north of Bellegrave Ave. and south of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road
Project
Description:

General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Specific Plan to provide a mix of warehousing, light industrial, office, and retail uses. Major Development Review for the development of two industrial buildings of approximately 1,007,705 square feet and 1,033,192 square feet.

CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (certified)
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Approved by City Council on November 12, 2014

See the following projects for more recent activity at the Goodman Commerce Center Development:
 Project No. PLN17-20033 Retail Building CR-3 – Starbucks & other tenants (GCC.1)  Project No. PLN18-20014 Retail Building CR-12 – Quick Quack Carwash (GCC.2)  Project No. PLN18-20042 Retail Building CR-11 – Multi-Tenant (GCC.3)  Project No. PLN19-20006 Retail Building CR-10- Chick-fil-A (GCC.4)  Project No. PLN19-20063 Retail Building CR-8 – Altura Credit Union (GCC.5)  Project No. PLN19-20064 Retail Building CR-6 (GCC.6)
 Project No. PLN20-20018 Retail Building CR-6A, CRA, CR-B, CR-C  Project No. PLN21-20063 Retail Building CR-1 – Chili’s  Project No. PLN21-20068 Retail Building CR-2 – Olive Garden  Project No. PLN22-20025 Planning Area-4 Development
48 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

34 GCC CR-1 Chili’s Alcohol CUP and VAR (MAP ID: GCC.13) Project: GCC CR-1 Alcohol CUP and VAR Project Map:

Current Status:
 Project is currently on hold per developer.

Project No.: PLN22-20010_CUP002_VAR001
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd.; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 160-510-023
Project
Description:

Conditional Use Permit for the on-sale and consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits at a 7,757 square foot PAD building (CR-1) restaurant (dba Chili’s).

Variance to request modification to the sign standards to allow four (4) tenant wall signs.

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on March 7, 2022
 On April 20, 2022, PLN22-20012 was approved by the Planning Commission subject to conditions of approval.

49 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

35 New Restaurant Shell (CR-1)
Project: Commercial Restaurant Building (CR-1) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Grading plans and Construction plans have been approved and construction will begin shortly.

Project No. PLN25-20031 DR003
Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road. & Goodman Way.

Project
Description:

Major Development Review for the development of a new
restaurant building of 5,780 sq. ft. located on 1.17-acre vacant lot.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 4.23.25
 On 5.20.25 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 6.12.25 the applicant resubmitted to the Planning Division.  A public hearing was scheduled for 8.20.25 to present the project to the Planning Commission
 On August 20, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN25-20031 and is subject to conditions of approval.

50 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

36 GCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM (MAP ID: GCC.15)
Project: GCC Planning Area 4 DR and TPM Project Map:

Current Status:

 Buildings are currently being leased.

Project No.: PLN22-20025 CR -13 and TPM No. 38438, PLN22 -20056 DR CR -14, PLN22 - 20057 DR CR-15, PLN22-20058 DR CR-16, PLN22-20059 DR CR-17 Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Goodman Way (Assessor Parcel Number: 160-510-010, -011, -012, -013, -015, -016, and -033) Project
Description:

Major Development Review (DR) for development of five (5) business park buildings ranging in size from 40,000 sf to 59,987 sf in Planning Area 4 of the Goodman Commerce Center in Eastvale Specific Plan.

TPM No. 38438: For the reconfiguration of a 14.4-acre site into five (5) individual parcels.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on April 20, 2022.
 Project was deemed incomplete by Staff on May 19, 2022.  Received resubmittal on August 8, 2022.
 Project was deemed incomplete by Staff on August 24, 2022.  Project was deemed complete by Staff on September 28, 2022.  On October 19,2022, the Planning Commission approved PLN22-20025, -56 through -59 subject to conditions of approval.
 Building Permits issued on November 28,2023

51 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

37 Team Up Arena
Project: Team Up Arena Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Plans have been submitted and are under review with Building Division.

Project No. PLN25-20056 CUP
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Goodman Way.

Project
Description:

Conditional Use Permit to allow for an indoor recreation facility that will include (but not limited to) trampolines, dodgeball, augmented reality attractions, open jump areas, mini golf, darts, and bowling.

Conditional Use Permit to allow for a type 47 beer wine and distilled spirits for on-site consumption.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 8.13.25
 An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 9.3.25.  On 9.18 the applicant resubmitted the project.
 The project was scheduled for Planning Commission on 10.15.25.  October 15, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN25- 20056 and is subject to Conditions of Approval.

52 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

38 All-Magic
Project: All-Magic Paint and Body Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ ON November 19, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN25-20081 and is subject to Conditions of Approval.

Project No. PLN25-20081 CUP
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Commerce.

Project
Description:

Conditional Use Permit to allow for an indoor autobody paint and repair center that is contained completely within the building.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 10.13.25
 The project was deemed complete and scheduled for 11.19.25 Planning Commission meeting.

53 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

39 Hamner Place Pad-2 (MAP ID: HPLC.4)
Project: PAD-2 at Hamner Place Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ The Shell for Pad 2 received final approval.
▪ The Bruster’s Ice Cream is still under plan check review. ▪ The Chipotle has been approved and is currently operational.

Project No. PLN24-20019_MDR008_CUP001
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Schleisman Rd. and of Hamner Ave.

Project
Description:

New 4,250 sq. ft. multi-tenant shops with pick-up drive-up lane.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 2.26.24
 On March 21, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant, awaiting
resubmittal.
 May 1, 2024 applicant resubmitted.
 June 3, 2024 the application was deemed complete and tentatively scheduled for July planning commission.
 On July 17, 2024 The Planning Commission approved the entitlements for PLN24-20019 and is subject to conditions of approval.

54 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

40 The Ranch (MAP ID: RNCH)
Project: The Ranch Project Map

Current Status:
 Approved.
 Continue discussing potential development for commercial portion.  Construction of six industrial/warehouse buildings are completed.  A resolution for the Final Cancellation of the Williamson Act Contract for the Rodriguez Site was adopted by City Council meeting on July 24, 2019.

Project No. 15-0783
Project
Location:

Northeast and southeast corners of Hellman and future Limonite (Kimball) Avenues, west of Cucamonga Creek Channel.

Moons Site (APNs: 144-010-008-0, 144-101-013-4) and Rodriguez Site (APN:
144-010-009-1)
Project
Description:
• Specific Plan Amendment to modify boundaries for Planning Areas 1 through 6, land use designation for Planning Area 5, and revisions to allowable uses. No revisions to Planning Areas 7 through 9. • Major Development Review for six (6) industrial buildings totaling 985,000 square feet on six (6) parcels.
• Tentative Parcel Map No. 36787 to subdivide approximately 97 gross acres into 14 legal parcels.

CEQA: EIR Addendum
Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Approved by City Council on December 9, 2015.
▪ February 19, 2016, a new owner purchased the six (6) industrial lots. ▪ Monument Sign approved on February 1, 2018.
▪ See the following projects for more recent activity at The Ranch:
 Project No. PLN18-20007: Eastvale 88,000 square-foot Warehouse building in Planning Area 3. (RNCH.1)
 Project No. PLN18-20050: Howard Industrial -Major Development Review, Tentative Map for Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 (RNCH.2)
 Project No. PLN19-20034: Transwestern – Major Development Review, Amendment to Tentative Parcel Map for Planning Areas 7, 8, and 9 (RNCH.3)  Project No. PLN19-20035: Summit Development – Major Development Review for Planning Area 6 (RNCH.4)
55 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

41 Beyond Food Mart at The Ranch (MAP ID: RNCH.5)
Project: Beyond Food Mart Major Development Review and Conditional Use Permit(s) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ The Building Permits have been issued and is currently under construction.

Project No. PLN21-20014_DR002_CUP003
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Hellman Ave. and Limonite Ave. at The Ranch Specific Plan (Assessor Parcel Number: 144-010-077)
Project
Description:

Major Development Review, for the construction of a new 7,150 square-foot Beyond Food Mart with a single lane drive-through operation, a 5,177 square- foot canopy, and a 2,312 square-foot drive-through carwash Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of automobile service station with concurrent off sale of beer and wine (Type 20)
Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of a C-Store with a drive-through Conditional Use Permit, for the operation of a drive-through carwash

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on 3.17.21
▪ On November 17, 2021, the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20014, subject to conditions of approval.
56 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

42 The Ranch TPM No. 38114 (MAP ID: RNCH.6)
Project: The Ranch TPM No. 38114 Project Map:

Current Status:

The Building Permits of PLN21-20014 have been issued
and is currently under construction.

Project No. PLN22-20009_TPM38114
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Hellman Avenue; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 144- 010-077
Project
Description:

Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide one (1) 10.68 acres into two (2) individual parcels.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on March 2, 2022
▪ On May 18th, 2022, the Planning Commission approved project PLN22-20009, subject to conditions of approval.
▪ On November 17, 2021, the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20014.

57 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

43 Hotel Suites (HPLC.1)
Project: Hotel - Staybridge Suites at Hamner Place Project Map:

Current Status:
 The Staybridge Suites has obtained Certificate of Occupancy and is fully operational.

Project No. PLN19-20023
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road; ( Assessor Parcel Number: 152-050-050)
Project
Description:

Major Development Review for a hotel and a banquet facility and a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of alcohol for on-site consumption.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on June 6, 2019.

See the following project for more information:
▪ PLN17-20015: Hamner Place (former Polopolus Property) ▪ Approved by Planning Commission on June 19, 2019.
▪ Building plans received for review on January 30, 2020.

58 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

44 Hamner Place Retail Suites D.R (HPLC.3)
Project: Hamner Place Retail Suites – Major Development Review (DR) Project Map:

Current Status:
 The Building is currently operational.

Project No. PLN19-20053
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road;
(Assessor’s Parcel Number: 152-060-003)
Project
Description:

Major Development Review for a multi-tenant building to include retail suites and a potential restaurant. The restaurant is proposed to be 5,910 square feet and the shops portion of the building is 2,270 square feet for a total building floor area of 9,190 square feet.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on November 21, 2019.
 On December 18, 2019, the Planning Commission approved project PLN19-20053 subject to conditions of approval.

59 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

45 The Merge (MAP ID: MRG)
Project: The Merge Retail and Industrial Center Project Map:

Current Status:
• The Merge Industrial and Retail have completed construction.

Project No. PLN18-20026
Project
Location:

Northeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue; APN: 164-010- 019-6
Project
Description:

Major Development Review, Tentative Parcel Map, and Variance for the development of a retail and light industrial center on an approximately 26-acre site, and various Conditional Use Permits for certain uses.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
▪ Received application on May 24, 2018; Development plans received on June 26, 2018.
▪ Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) available for a 45-day public review period from September 18, 2018, to November 2, 2018.
▪ Condition Use Permits application submitted on October 1, 2018. ▪ November 21, 2018, Planning Commission recommended approval of all applications, plus added new conditions for the Major Development Review application.
▪ December 12, 2018, City Council certified the EIR and approved all applications as recommended by the Planning Commission including the new conditions recommended by the Planning Commission, plus the Council added one new condition for the Major Development Review. January 9, 2019, City Council conducted second reading of ordinance for Change of Zone. ▪ Construction building plans for industrial buildings 1-6 approved by Planning

11.25.19 ▪ Sprouts (Major 1) is completed and in operation 10.28.20

60 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

46 Walmart (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Walmart – Eastvale Crossings Project Map:

Current Status:
 The site is currently operational.

Project No. PLN12-0051, PLN21-20021_DR002 (Ref. PLN12-0051) Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Limonite and Archibald Avenues (APN 144-030-039) Project
Description:

General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Major Development Review, five Conditional Use Permits, Tentative Tract Map No. 35061, and Variance for the development of a 177,000 +/- sq. ft. retail store and several outparcels on 24.78 acres.

CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (certified)
Major Development Review for the construction of a Walmart gasoline service station with an ancillary 1,620 square foot convenience store located on Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract Map No. 35061
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 City Council approval on April 26, 2017.
 Project was reviewed by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission and received a conditional finding of conformance with the Chino Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.  Public review of DEIR available from September 27 to November 17, 2016.  On March 15, 2017, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the project to City Council.  City Council public hearing on April 12, 2017, with a staff recommendation to continue the hearing to April 26, 2017.  City Council approval on April 26, 2017. Notice of Determination recorded on April 27, 2017.  Waiting for applicant to submit construction plans.
 Extension of Time (PLN19-20052) has been approved by the Planning Commission on 1.15.2020  Extension of Time (PLN19-20052) has been approved by the Planning Commission on 1.15.2020  Extension of Time (PLN21-20021 MDR002) has been approved by the planning department on 11.02.2021.  Minor Development Review (PLN22-20012 MDR002) has been approved by the planning department on 1.24.2023  Extension of Time (PLN22-20017 EOT 001) has been approved by the planning department on 10.20.2021  On April 26, 2023, the City Council approved Final Map TR35061. 61 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

47 Mister Carwash (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Mister Car Wash Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Building Division has construction plans ready to issue. ▪ Public Works Department is currently awaiting submittal for grading.

Project No. PLN24-20024_DR001_CUP002
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:

New 5,435 sq. ft. building with 3 queuing lanes funneling into a 130’ tunnel which leads out to 26 vacuum stalls.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 3.25.24
 On April 23, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent to the applicant  On June 11, 2024 resubmittal was received.
 On July 10, 2024 an incomplete letter was sent to the applicant  On August 20, 2024, the Planning Division deemed the project complete  On September 18, 2024 the Planning Commission approved project PLN24- 20024, subject to conditions of approval.

62 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

48 McDonanlds (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: McDonalds Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ The project has obtained construction documents with the Building Division and Public Works Department.

Project No. PLN24-20089_DR009
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:

New 4,375 sq. ft. building with drive thru lane.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 10.15.24
 An incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant on 11.14.24  On 1.6.25 the project was resubmitted for second round of review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for the 2.19.25 planning Commission.
 On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24- 20089 and is subject to conditions of approval.

63 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

49 Better Buzz (MAP ID: WMT)
Project: Better Buzz Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On February 19, 2025 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20091 and is subject to conditions of approval.
▪ Currently awaiting construction documents to be submitted with the Building Division and Public Works Department.

Project No. PLN24-20091_MDR015
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Limonite Ave. and of Archibald Ave. (APN:144030039)
Project
Description:

New 1,770 sq. ft. building with patio and drive-thru
Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
 Received application on 10.28.24
 On 11.21.24 an incomplete letter was sent out to the applicant.  On 1.21.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for second round of review.  The Project was deemed complete and scheduled for the 2.19.25 planning Commission.

64 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

50 Dunkin Donuts and Carwash DR and CUP (MAP ID: DUNK)
Project: Dunkin Donuts and Carwash DR and CUP Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ All-American Carwash has received TCO and is currently operational. ▪ Dunkin Donuts have pulled permits currently under construction.

Project No. PLN21-20030_DR_003_CUP_007 Dunkin Donuts and PLN21- 20060_DR006_CUP011 American Express Carwash
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Schleisman and Hamner Ave.; Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 152-341-017
Project
Description:

Major Development Review (DR): For the development of a 3,400 square foot multi-tenant building where 1,600 square feet will be for a Dunkin Donuts with a drive-through and outdoor patio and where 1,800 square feet will be for a bistro with an outdoor patio. (PLN21- 20030)

Major Development Review (DR): for the development of a 5,113 square foot car/truck wash with 18 vacuum stalls. (PLN21-20060)

Conditional Use Permit (CUP): To allow the operation of a drive- through for the proposed coffee shop. (PLN21-20030)

Conditional Use Permit (CUP): To allow the operation of a drive- through for the proposed car/truck wash use. (PLN21-20060) Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
 Received application on 5.26.21
 Applicant has provided updated submittal package 5.9.22  On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission approved project PLN21-20030 and PLN21-20060, subject to conditions of approval.
 The Building Division has approved constructions plans.

65 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

51 Cherry Tree Residential
Project: Cherry Tree Residential Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ On October 17, 2025, construction documents were submitted for Building Division Review.

Project No. PLN24-20092 TTM DR010 and PLN24-20057 SB330 Project
Location:

Southwest corner of Walters St. and Selby Ave.

Project
Description:

Vesting Tentative Tract Map for 39 lots for a single-family home community.

Major Development Review for the development of 39
single-family residential units, 38 attached ADUs, and 38 detached ADUs.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 10.28.24
 An incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 11.26.24  On 3.3.25 the applicant resubmitted for plan review.
 A second incomplete letter was sent to the applicant on 3.27.25  On 5.12.25 the applicant resubmitted for plan review.  The project was deemed complete and scheduled for the June 18, 2025, to be presented to the Planning Commission.
 On June 18, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN24-20092 and is subject to conditions of approval.

N
66 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

52 Oasis Residential
Project: Oasis Residential Project Map:

Current Status:
 On November 19, 2025, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN25- 20016 and is subject to Conditions of Approval.

Project No. PLN25-20016 TTM002 DR002 SBB330
Project
Location:

Southeast corner of Chandler Ave. & Hellman Ave.

Project
Description:

Tentative Tract Map for 65 lots for a single-family home community and 2 open space lots.

Major Development Review for the development of 65
single-family residential units.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 3.19.25
 On 4.17.25 the applicant received an incomplete letter.  On 5.20.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for Planning Division review.
 Additional CEQA documents were submitted on 6.11.25.
 On 7.20.25 the applicant received a second incomplete letter.  On 10.1.25 the applicant resubmitted the project for Division review.  The project was scheduled for Planning Commission on 11.19.25

67 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

53 Archibald and Chandler Retail (MAP ID: ACR)
Project: Archibald and Chandler Retail Center Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Awaiting submittal of Final parcel map to Public Works Department.
▪ Quick Quack has submitted for grading to Public Works and construction documents to Building Division.
▪ Dutch Bros has submitted for grading to Public Works and construction documents to Building Division.
▪ Overall site grading has been submitted to Public Works. ▪ Zendejas has submitted construction documents for plan check with the Building Division.

Project No. PLN23-20018 TPM #37653, PLN23-20019 MDR004 CUP002, PLN23-20020 MDR005 CUP003, PLN23-20020 MDR006
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Archibald and Chandler; ( Assessor Parcel Numbers: 144- 130-004, 144-130-011, 144-130-012, 144-130-013)
Project
Description:

Tentative Parcel Map (37653) to parcelize a 2.71-acre site into three (3) parcels.

Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 0.81-acre parcel comprised of a 3,500 square feet sit-down restaurant (Zendejas) Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 1.18-acre parcel a 3,598 square feet drive-through carwash (Quick Quack Express Carwash)
Minor Development Review for a commercial development on a 0.75-acre parcel with a 950 square feet drive-through coffee shop (Dutch Bros).

Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a drive-through coffee shop.

Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a drive-through carwash.

Planner: Allen Lim
Notes:
 Received application on 04.11.23
 On 5/9/2023 comments were returned to the applicant.
 On July 27, 2023 the project was resubmitted.
 On August 24, 2023 a correction letter was sent out to the applicant.  Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023.
 The item was continued to the November 15, 2023 Planning Commission.  The Item was continued to the December 20,2023 Planning Commission.  On December 20, 2023, the Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23- 20018 TPM #37653, PLN23-20019 MDR004 CUP002, PLN23-20020 MDR005 CUP003, PLN23-20020 MDR006

68 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

54 Magnolia Ranch
Project: Magnolia Ranch (Woodside) Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Building plans were issued on 2.13.2025 and the project is currently under construction.
▪ Model homes are open to the public.

Project No. PLN23-20043 DR005
Project
Location:

Southwest of Schleisman Rd. and Scholar Way. North of Orange St.

Project
Description:

Development Review for the development of 41 traditional single- family homes on lots of a minimum 55’ x 90 (4950 SF)

Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ Application submitted on July 6, 2023.
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 6, 2023
▪ Application deemed complete scheduled Planning Commission date of October 18, 2023
▪ On October 18, 2023 Planning Commission approved entitlements for PLN23-20043 and is subject to conditions of approval.

69 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

55 St. Oscar Romero Modular Buildings
Project: St. Oscar Romero’s Modular Buildings Project Map:

Current Status:
▪ Building Division has issued permits for construction and is currently under construction.

Project No. PLN23-20038 MDR008
Project
Location:

Northwest corner of Chandler St. and of Selby Ave. North of Retriever St.

Project
Description:

Minor Development Review for the development of 2 temporary 1,059 square feet (total of 2,118 square feet) Modular Office Building with accessible stairs, ramps, restrooms, parking and connected walkway.

Planner: Steven D. Fowler
Notes:
▪ Application submitted on July 6, 2023.
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 6, 2023
▪ Application was deemed incomplete on July 24, 2023
▪ Application was resubmitted on August 21, 2023
▪ Application was deemed complete on September 7, 2023.

70 Planning Department Major Projects Summary
February 25, 2026

1. New projects are added to the bottom of the list as they are submitted.

2. Projects that have been completed for more than one year are removed from this list.

3. Highlighted Text =Updated Information

56 Future

The Leal Plan (MAP ID: LEAL)
Project: Leal Master Plan Project Map:

Current Status:
 Construction documents are currently under review
for phase A of Leal Master Plan. Awaiting submission
of entitlements application for phase B.

Project No. Special Project
Project
Location:
160 acres + at the northwest corner of Hamner and Limonite Avenue, east of Scholar Way, and south of 58th Street.

Project
Description:

This Master Plan describes the community’s vision for the project area, identifies appropriate land uses, and includes the development standards that are necessary to achieve the vision, defines the character of the project’s development, lists the steps involved with the development process, and provides the project’s implementation plan.

CEQA: EIR
Planner: Jamie K. Cerda
Notes:
▪ In September 16, 2016, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council.

May 2017 – City has been asked by property owner’s representative to postpone action on the project while issues related to the estate of Brad Leal are resolved August 30, 2017 – City met with Leal family and prospective developer to discuss processing and timing. ▪ City Council Approved Master Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report on December 13, 2017. ▪ Adopted by City Council on December 13, 2017.
▪ Staff continues to coordinate with the property owners as they seek a developer(s) for the site. ▪ Planning Commission recommend approval to City Council on April 26, 2022 ▪ On May 11, 2022, the City Council approved the Leal Masterplan Amendment (PLN21-20039) and related entitlements (DA, TTM 382290, DR PLN22-20020)
▪ On May 25, 2022, the City Council approved the second reading of the ordinances for the Leal Master Plan Amendment (PLN21-20039) and Development Agreement (PLN22-20039). ▪ On August 24, 2022, Lot Line Adjustment (2022-001) was recorded with the Assessor-County Clerk Recorder.
71 AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.3
February 25, 2026
Public Works Department Update
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the Public Works Department update.

Summary
The Public Works Department provides monthly updates on residen"al and commercial development projects, encroachment permits, capital improvements projects including a grant summary.

Background
Not Applicable.

Analysis
Not Applicable.

Environmental
Not Applicable.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not Applicable.

Fiscal Impact
Not Applicable.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
72 Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not Applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - PW Project Update List

Attachment 2 - PW Grant Summary

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
73 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 1 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Project (Phase 1)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A design build project to construct a Phase 1 of the Civic Center Project, which includes approximately 52,000 square foot City Hall, a 25,000 square foot library, a 20,000 square foot police station with a park and a civic plaza.

PROJECT STATUS: In Construction: The construction contract was awarded to Clark Construction on June 25, 2025. Notice to Proceed was issued to Clark, effective August 11, 2025.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Structural steel erection continues as well as the offsite utility work in Bootsma.

PROJECT RENDERING:

74 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 2 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Limonite Gap Pedestrian Bridge
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install a prefabricated steel fabricated bridge over Cucamonga Creek Channel to close the gap of pedestrian path within the SCE easement.

PROJECT STATUS: : In Design – Engineering: Design contract was awarded to TYLin on April 10, 2024. 65% PS&E was delivered on February 17, 2025 and is being reviewed. Technical studies are being prepared to submit to Caltrans for NEPA EA.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: 100% PS&E is anticipated to be delivered by June 2026.

PROJECT MAP:

75 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 3 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Median Improvement Projects at River Rd, Cantu Galleano Rd, and Archibald Ave
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will Install landscaped raised medians at River Rd, Cantu Galleano Rd, and Archibald Ave to physically separate opposing traffic streams and help stop vehicles traveling into opposing traffic lanes.

The project will be constructed in two phases: Phase 1 will involve the construction of hardscape including curb, gutter, and sleeve for future utilities, and Phase 2 will include the installation of landscaping, monument, and lighting.

PROJECT STATUS: In Construction: Construction contract for Phase 2 was awarded in May 2025.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: Landscaping and median monument signs have been installed, along with the streetlight poles on River Rd. Associated electrical work is being scheduled for installation and energization.

PROJECT IMAGE:

76 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 4 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Traffic Signal Improvement at Sumner Ave and 68th St PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project will design and install traffic signals at the intersection of Sumner Ave and 68th Street.

PROJECT STATUS: In Design – Engineering: Design contract was awarded to STC on August 13, 2025.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: The final PS&E is expected to be completed by February 2026, and the project is tentatively scheduled to be advertised for construction bidding in April 2026.

PROJECT IMAGE:

77 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 5 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Traffic Signal Synchronization - Phase 1 Arterials PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic synchronization components and fiber optic line and/or wireless antenna to relay signal per the traffic signal synchronization master plan. Traffic signal synchronization of major corridors will be completed in two phases. Phase 1 includes Hamner Avenue, Archibald Avenue, Schleisman Road and Scholar Way. Phase 2 includes collectors streets including Harrison Ave, Sumner Ave, 65th St, and Citrus St (CIP 94007). This project is for Phase 1, and synchronization on Schleisman Rd will be completed after the intersection of Schleisman Rd and Sumner is improved by a developer.

PROJECT STATUS: In Design - Engineering: Design contract was awarded to STC on August 13, 2025.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: The final PS&E is expected to be completed by May 2026, and the project is tentatively scheduled to be advertised for construction bidding in June 2026.

PROJECT IMAGE:

78 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 6 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Hellman Avenue Street Widening and Walters Pedestrian Bridge PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves widening Hellman Avenue from Walters Street to River Road to eliminate bottlenecks and improve traffic flow. The scope includes conducting a feasibility study, preparing environmental documents, right-of-way easement documents, and PS&E. The project will be completed in two phases: 1) Widening of Hellman Avenue north of Chandler Avenue, including lot grading south of Rondo Elementary School and bridge widening. 2) Widening of Hellman Avenue from Shortham Street to River Road. The feasibility study will determine the most efficient approach for phasing the project.

PROJECT STATUS: In Design - Engineering: This project is receiving TUMF funding.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: The RFP for design and environmental services has been issued. The NTP is anticipated in March 2026.

PROJECT IMAGE:

79 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 7 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Capital Improvements Project
PROJECT NAME: Schleisman Road Mobility, Safety and Connectivity Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construction of Schleisman Road between Hamner Avenue and Sumner Avenue to include all-inclusive, all ages and abilities.

PROJECT STATUS: In Design – Engineering: Notice to Proceed issued 6/12/2025.

PROJECT SCHEDULE: 30% plans are anticipated to be delivered in early February.

PROJECT IMAGE:

80 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 8 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Oasis Residential
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Chandler Street and Hellman Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 65 Residential units on 8.2 acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Project is currently in review for entitlement.

PROJECT MAP:

HELLMAN AVE

CHANDLER ST
81 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 9 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Warmington Residential
PROJECT NUMBER: PW25-10004
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Grapewin Street PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 76 residential lots on 8.3 acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Project is in the plan check phase.

PROJECT MAP:

ARCHIBALD AVE

GRAPEWIN ST
82 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 10 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Hamner Place
PROJECT NUMBER: PW18-10712
PROJECT LOCATION: East of Hamner Avenue and Schleisman Road PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements include 21.48 gross acres.

PROJECT STATUS: Onsite improvement ongoing
PROJECT MAP:

HAMNER AVE
83 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 11 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Residential Development
PROJECT NAME: Eastwalk/ Leal
PROJECT NUMBER: PW22-1004
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Limonite Avenue and Hamner Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 158.6 acre development that will include approximately 2500 residential units as well as plans for future commercial development PROJECT STATUS: Developer has obtained precise grading, street, sewer and water, and building permits.

Phase A homes are now on sale.

PROJECT MAP:

HAMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY
58TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE
84 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 12 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Chandler Plaza
PROJECT NUMBER: TPM 37653
PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of Chandler Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2.70 acre subdivision into three retail development parcels

PROJECT STATUS: Developer is working to obtain permits
PROJECT MAP:

CHANDLER AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
85 EASTVALE PUBLIC WORKS

PROJECT UPDATES

Page 13 of 13 ends

PROJECT TYPE: Commercial Development
PROJECT NAME: Walmart
PROJECT NUMBER: PW23-10004
PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of Limonite Avenue and Archibald Avenue PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 177,000 square foot retail center on 23.3 acres

PROJECT STATUS: Walmart is open. Off-site improvements are wrapping up in the next couple months.

PROJECT MAP:

LIMONITE AVE

ARCHIBALD AVE
86 AGENCY GRANT NAME PROJECT NAME GRANT AWARD MATCH DUE DATE STATUS USDOT: Department of
Transportation
Congressman Calvert: 2023 Transportation
and Infrastructure Appropriations Bill Limonite Gap Pedistrian Bridge 1,600,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ This grant is for construction
phaseo only. The project is
currently under design.

California Department of
Resources Recycling and
Recovery CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement (TRP)
Grant Program (TRP16-23-0047) Annual Overlay/Residential Slurry Seal Project 170,586.00$ April 1, 2026 California Department of
Transportation
HSIP: Highway Safety Improvement
Program Cycle 12
Traffic Signal Improvement at Sumner and 68th 642,402.00$ 79,398.00 $ March 31, 2028 Allocation request for PE phase will be submitted.

PUBLIC WORKS GRANTS SUMMARY

GRANTS AWARDED
87 AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.4
February 25, 2026
Treasurer’s Report: January 2026
Prepared By:

Amanda Wells, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer’s Report.

Summary
In accordance with the City of Eastvale’s Investment Policy, adopted September 10, 2025, the City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly treasurer’s report to the City Council. The report shall include types of investments, credit ra*ngs, ins*tu*ons involved, dates of purchases, dates of maturity, amount of deposits or cost of the security, current market value of the securi*es, interest rates, investment fund balances, and a statement as to whether investments are in compliance with the Investment Policy and whether there are suﬃcient funds to meet the City’s cash obliga*ons for the next six months.

Background
The Schedule of Investments includes a breakdown of the City’s investments by “Ac*ve” or “Inac*ve” Deposits. “Ac*ve Deposits” are those accounts which receive revenues, whereas “Inac*ve Deposits” are available for use but are not earning revenues. Detail reports for the PFM Managed Investment Por2olio, with all supplemental informa*on required by the City’s investment policy, are included in the report.

The Dash Board Report Card, consists of two sections:

I. Por2olio Diversiﬁca*on – This sec*on reﬂects the diversiﬁca*on of the City of Eastvale’s por2olio by both type of instrument and length of maturity. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
88 II. Por2olio Performance Measures – This sec*on compares budget to actuals in for interest earnings. Also included is a cash breakdown report per the City’s fund balance reserve policy showing funds restricted, commi>ed, designated, and unassigned in addi*on to investment income received as of January 31, 2026, broken down by investment type. The City of Eastvale’s Schedule of Investments complies with the City’s Investment Policy. The City has suﬃcient funds to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. Total cash and investments as of the en d of
January are $345,684,629 (book value). Ac*ve deposits total $2291,375,471; inac*ve deposits total $8,019,637. The remaining amount of $46,289,521 accounts for cash with ﬁscal agent, which comprises bond proceeds for the Civic Center Project. Net investment income received for ﬁscal year 2025-26 through the end of January (seven months of the ﬁscal year) is $7,671,368. The net annualized yield on investments is 4.031
%.

Cash and investment income is spread among all of the city's 100+ funds and is not an indicator of available cash in any one particular fund, such as the General Fund.

Environmental
Government investment reports are not considered a Project as deﬁned by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
The Treasurer's Report is an ac*vity required by the city's investment policy and is not a strategic activity.

Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Not applicable.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Investment Report: January 2026

Attachment 2 - PFM Statement: January 2026

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
89 Introduction
Month Ending
Active
Deposits
Ending Book
Value
Inactive
Deposits
Ending Book
Value
Cash With
Fiscal Agent Interest*
Realized
Gain/(Loss)
Yield at
Cost
February 28, 2025 $ 246,798,563 $ 12,000,000 $ - 521,425$ $ (3,188) 3.854% March 31, 2025 253,346,989 8,000,000 - 533,139 (17,538) 4.198% April 30, 2025 254,899,446 8,001,373 - 1,305,239 (2,205) 4.235% May 31, 2025 262,369,797 8,001,373 - 542,829 (29,916) 4.115% June 30, 2025 263,428,432 8,041,373 - 636,113 13,921 4.117% July 31, 2025 267,263,935 8,003,111 57,529,535 1,408,122 23,852 4.951% August 31, 2025 273,409,767 10,818,948 57,549,582 646,820 227 4.848% September 30, 2025 277,037,455 8,000,000 57,549,582 868,876 31,270 4.736% October 31, 2025 283,398,116 8,000,000 57,939,042 1,585,273 32,301 4.549% November 30, 2025 282,017,368 8,000,000 50,257,618 736,541 60,384 4.408% December 31, 2025 285,973,519 8,000,000 46,150,973 782,599 30,195 4.194% January 31, 2026 291,375,471 8,019,637 46,289,521 1,467,729 18,703 4.056% *LAIF interest is received quarterly in July, October, January, and April

CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026
In accordance with the City Investment Policy, a quarterly investment report shall be filed with the City Council which provides a clear picture of the status of the current investments. The report for the month ending January 31, 2026 has been prepared by City Staff. We hereby certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy. Combined with anticipated revenues, the portfolio contains sufficient investment liquidity to meet budgeted expenditures for the next six months.
12 MONTH BALANCES
This report is based on the city's fiscal year, July through June.

Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 1 90 Schedule of Investments
Par Value
Book Value Price
@ Cost
(Fair Value)
Market Value Yield
Money Market Accounts:

Citizens Business Bank - Money Market -$ -$ -$ 0.100% First American Govt Oblig Fund CI Y 189,174 189,174 189,174 3.310% Total Money Market 189,174$ 189,174$ 189,174$ 3.310% Sweep Accounts:

Citizens Business Bank - General Sweep 36,757,977$ 36,757,977$ 36,757,977$ 0.100% Total Sweep Accounts 36,757,977$ 36,757,977$ 36,757,977$ 0.100% Pooled Investment Accounts:

CAMP Pool 138,363,046$ 138,363,046$ 138,363,046$ 3.850% Local Agency Investment Fund* 74,973,371 74,973,371 75,063,212 4.200% Total Pooled Investment 213,336,417$ 213,336,417$ 213,426,258$ 3.973% PFM Managed Investment Portfolio:

U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 18,025,000$ 17,724,437$ 18,015,906$ 3.840% U.S. Treasury Bill - - - 0.000% Supra-National Agency Bond / Note - - - 0.000% Municipal Bond / Note - - - 0.000% Federal Agency Commercial 8,186,374 8,135,575 8,333,676 4.790% Asset-Back Security / Collateralized 5,427,280 5,426,601 5,464,278 4.410% Certificate of Deposit 360,000 360,000 362,661 5.080% Federal Agency Bond / Note - - - 0.000% Bank Note 925,000 925,020 935,949 5.480% Corporate Note 8,584,000 8,520,269 8,643,605 4.340% Total PFM Managed Investments 41,507,655$ 41,091,904$ 41,756,076$ 4.255% 291,791,222$ 291,375,471$ 292,129,485$ 4.056% Checking Account:

Citizens Business Bank - General Account 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ 0.000% Total Inactive Deposits 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ 0.000% 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ 8,019,637$ Revenue Lease Bonds
US Bank Series 2025A** 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 3.350% Total Cash with Fiscal Agent 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 3.350% 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 46,289,521$ 346,100,380$ 345,684,629$ 346,438,643$ *yield as of the prior quarter end **new as of 07/31/2025 Per Government Code requirements, the Investment Report is in compliance with the City of Eastvale's Investment Policy, and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next six months.

CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026

GRAND TOTAL CASH
Institution

ACTIVE DEPOSITS TOTAL

INACTIVE DEPOSITS

ACTIVE DEPOSITS

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT

INACTIVE DEPOSITS TOTAL

CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT TOTAL
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 2 91 Dash Board Report Card
I. PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION*
Money Market 0.06%
Sweep 12.58%
LAIF 25.70%
CAMP Pool 47.36%
Certificates of Deposit 0.12%
U.S. Treasury Bond/ Note 6.17%
U.S. Treasury Bill 0.00%
Supra-National Agency Bond/Note 0.00%
Municipal Bond / Note 0.00%
Federal Agency Collaterized Mortgage 2.85%
Asset-Backed Security/ Collateralized 1.87%
Federal Agency Bond/ Note 0.00%
Bank Note 0.32%
Corporate Note 2.96%
100.00%
Less Than 90 Days 85.71%
90 days to Six Months (26 Weeks) 0.12%
Six Months to One Year (52 Weeks) 0.84%
One to Two Years (104 Weeks) 2.44%
Two to Three Years (156 Weeks) 3.52%
Three to Four Years (208 Weeks) 3.30%
Four to Five Years 4.08%
Five Years + 0.00%
100.00%
II. PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE MEASURES*
Yield at Cost - January 31, 2026 4.056%
Annual Investment Income Budget 7,781,585$ A
Investment Income Received - YTD 01/31/2026 7,696,252 B Less Investment Fees (24,885) C
Net Investment Income Received - YTD 01/31/2026 7,671,368$ B+C Over/(Under) Annual Budget (110,217)$ C-B
% of Annual Budget 98.584%
Net Yield Annualized at Cost - January 31, 2026 4.031%
*excludes cash with fiscal agent

CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026

DIVERSIFICATION BY INSTRUMENT

DIVERSIFICATION BY MATURITY
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 3 92 Dash Board Report Card
Active Investments: Diversification by Maturity*
Active Investments: Diversification by Investment*

CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 >5 % of Portfolio
Maturity in Years
First American Govt Oblig Fund CI Y

0.07%
CAMP Pool

54.18%
Local Agency Investment Fund

29.39%
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

7.05%
U.S. Treasury Bill

0.00%
Supra-National Agency Bond / Note

0.00%
Municipal Bond / Note

0.00%
Federal Agency Commercial

3.26%
Asset-Back Security /
Collateralized

2.14%
Certificate of Deposit

0.14%
Federal Agency Bond / Note

0.00%
Bank Note

0.37%
Corporate Note

3.38%
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 4 93 Dash Board Report Card

CITY OF EASTVALE
Treasurer's Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026
*excludes cash with fiscal agent
All Activity: Year Over Year Total Interest Income
-
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Net Interest Income Received
Millions
Fiscal Year
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 5 94 Cash Breakdown per Fund Balance Reserve Policy
Schedule of Investments - January 31, 2026
Money Market Accounts 189,174$
Sweep Accounts 36,757,977
Pooled Investment Accounts 213,336,417
PFM Managed Investments 41,091,904
Checking Account 8,019,637
Cash with Fiscal Agent 46,289,521
Grand Total Cash - January 31, 2026 345,684,629$
Breakdown of Total Cash at January 31, 2026
Non-Spendable & Restricted Funds (Non-Discretionary Per Law): 139,593,459$ per 06/30/2025 audited financials
Committed (Formal Action of City Council): 135,221,901
per fiscal year 2025-26 adopted budget
Assigned (City's Intent):
per fiscal year 2025-26 adopted budget
Fire Operations
per fiscal year 2025-26 adopted budget 10,759,000
General Fund Emergency Contingency:
per fund balance reserve policy (General and Fire Funds) + 29,942,137 - Cash Flow for CIP Grants 16,854,090
- Cover Special Revenue Fund Negative Fund Balance 387,319 - Business Incentive Loan Program 130,000
- Land Purchases 11,600,000
- Financial System Implementation (FY 2025-26) 1,000,000 All Funds Adopted Budget
Revenues 210,291,546
Expenditures 198,702,740
All Funds Net Revenue - 11,588,806
Total Designated/ Assigned 59,083,740
Unassigned 11,785,530
Grand Total Cash - January 31, 2026 345,684,629$
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report

CITY OF EASTVALE
*Restricted, committed, and assigned figures based on estimated fund balances at the end of the fiscal year, 06/30/2026. However cash estimates in this report are based on the current month. As a result, it is typical that a variance exists between projected unassigned cash balance and current unassigned cash balances. The variance will not be resolved until the end of the fiscal year. A negative unassigned cash balance in the current period does not indicate a cash flow issue for the city.

Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 6 95 Investment Income Detail
Yield at Cost - January 31, 2026 4.056%
Annual Investment Income Budget A 7,781,585$
Investment Income Received YTD:

Money Market (CBB) -$
Sweep (CBB) 15,405
Money Market (PFM) 3,897
LAIF 2,381,551
CAMP Pool 3,367,047
Certificate of Deposits 18,288
Municipal Bond/Note 1,793
U.S. Treasury Bill 227,244
U.S. Treasury Bond/ Note 48,281
Federal Agency Bond/ Note 65,121
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage Backed Security 117,782 Asset-Backed Security 158,014
Corporate Note 190,713
Bank Note 25,306
Supra-National Agency Bond/Note -
US Bank Series 2025A 878,880
Realized Gain/ (Loss) 196,932
Total Investment Income Received - YTD 01/31/2026 B 7,696,252 Less Investment Fees Paid:

Trust Fees-U.S. Bank (2,570)
Management Fee-PFM (22,314)
Total Investment Fees Paid - YTD 01/31/2026 C (24,885)
Net Investment Income Received - YTD 01/31/2026 B+C 7,671,368$ Investment Income Over/(Under) Annual Budget C-B (110,217)$ Investment Income Annual Budget % Used 98.584%
Net Yield Annualized at Cost - January 31, 2026 4.031%
Fiscal Year 2025-26 as of January 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report

CITY OF EASTVALE
Prepared by the Finance Department in accordance with the adopted Investment Policy eastvaleca.gov 7 96 CITY OF EASTVALE

ACCOUNT STATEMENT
For the Month Ending
January 31, 2026
Customer Service
PO Box 11813
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1813
Contents
Cover/Disclosures
Summary Statement
Individual Accounts

CITY OF EASTVALE

AMANDA WELLS
12363 LIMONITE AVE
SUITE 910
EASTVALE, CA 91732
Client Management Team
Accounts included in Statement
20240100 CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
https://www.pfmam.comOnline Access 1-717-232-2723Customer Service Robert Montoya
Institutional Sales & Relationship Manager
633 W 5th Street, Suite/Floor 2560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
262-725-1090
[email protected]

97 For the Month Ending January 31, 2026
Account Statement
Important Disclosures
Important Disclosures
365 and dividing the result by 7. The yields quoted should not be considered a representation of the yield of the fund in the future, since the yield is not fixed.

Average maturity represents the average maturity of all securities and investments of a portfolio, determined by multiplying the par or principal value of each security or investment by its maturity (days or years), summing the products, and dividing the sum by the total principal value of the portfolio. The stated maturity date of mortgage backed or callable securities are used in this statement. However the actual maturity of these securities could vary depending on the level or prepayments on the underlying mortgages or whether a callable security has or is still able to be called.

Monthly distribution yield represents the net change in the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) resulting from all dividends declared during the month by a fund expressed as a percentage of the value of one share at the beginning of the month. This resulting net change is then annualized by multiplying it by 365 and dividing it by the number of calendar days in the month.

YTM at Cost The yield to maturity at cost is the expected rate of return, based on the original cost, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time period from purchase date to maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.

YTM at Market The yield to maturity at market is the rate of return, based on the current market value, the annual interest receipts, maturity value and the time period remaining until maturity, stated as a percentage, on an annualized basis.

Managed Account A portfolio of investments managed discretely by PFMAM according to the client’s specific investment policy and requirements. The investments are directly owned by the client and held by the client’s custodian.

Unsettled Trade A trade which has been executed however the final consummation of the security transaction and payment has not yet taken place.

Please review the detail pages of this statement carefully. If you think your statement is wrong, missing account information, or if you need more information about a transaction, please contact PFMAM within 60 days of receipt. If you have other concerns or questions regarding your account, or to request an updated copy of PFMAM's current disclosure statement, please contact a member of your client management team at PFMAM Service Operations at the address below.

PFM Asset Management
Attn: Service Operations
213 Market Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. PFM Asset Management ("PFMAM") is a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. ("USBAM"), a SEC-registered investment adviser. USBAM is direct subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank") and an indirect subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM. PFMAM maintains a written disclosure statement of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, please contact Service Operations at the address below.

Proxy Voting PFMAM does not normally receive proxies to vote on behalf of its clients.

However, it does on occasion receive consent requests. In the event a consent request is received the portfolio manager contacts the client and then proceeds according to their instructions. PFMAM’s Proxy Voting Policy is available upon request by contacting Service Operations at the address below.

Questions About an Account PFMAM’s monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of any accounts held by clients in pools that are managed by PFMAM. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes (i.e., settles) all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings and transactions. PFMAM recognizes that clients may use these reports to facilitate record keeping and that the custodian bank statement and the PFMAM statement should be reconciled and differences resolved.

Many custodians use a settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile due to a timing difference.

Account Control PFMAM does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian outside the scope of services provided by PFMAM. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies; implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions.

Market Value Generally, PFMAM’s market prices are derived from closing bid prices as of the last business day of the month as supplied by ICE Data Services. There may be differences in the values shown for investments due to accrued but uncollected income and the use of differing valuation sources and methods. Non-negotiable FDIC-insured bank certificates of deposit are priced at par. Although PFMAM believes the prices to be reliable, the values of the securities may not represent the prices at which the securities could have been bought or sold. Explanation of the valuation methods for a registered investment company or local government investment program is contained in the appropriate fund offering documentation or information statement.

Amortized Cost The original cost of the principal of the security is adjusted for the amount of the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until the date of the report. Discount or premium with respect to short term securities (those with less than one year to maturity at time of issuance) is amortized on a straightline basis. Such discount or premium with respect to longer term securities is amortized using the constant yield basis.

Tax Reporting Cost data and realized gains / losses are provided for informational purposes only. Please review for accuracy and consult your tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of your security transactions. PFMAM does not report such information to the IRS or other taxing authorities and is not responsible for the accuracy of such information that may be required to be reported to federal, state or other taxing authorities.

Financial Situation In order to better serve you, PFMAM should be promptly notified of any material change in your investment objective or financial situation.

Callable Securities Securities subject to redemption prior to maturity may be redeemed in whole or in part before maturity, which could affect the yield represented.

Portfolio The securities in this portfolio, including shares of mutual funds, are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by PFMAM, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government agency. Investment in securities involves risks, including the possible loss of the amount invested. Actual settlement values, accrued interest, and amortized cost amounts may vary for securities subject to an adjustable interest rate or subject to principal paydowns. Any changes to the values shown may be reflected within the next monthly statement’s beginning values.

Rating Information provided for ratings is based upon a good faith inquiry of selected sources, but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed.

Shares of some local government investment programs and TERM funds are distributed by representatives of USBAM's affiliate, U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. which is registered with the SEC as a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”). You may reach the FINRA by calling the FINRA Hotline at 1-800-289-9999 or at the FINRA website address
https://www.finra.org/investors/investor-contacts. A brochure describing the FINRA Regulation Public Disclosure Program is also available from FINRA upon request.

Key Terms and Definitions
Dividends on local government investment program funds consist of interest earned, plus any discount ratably amortized to the date of maturity, plus all realized gains and losses on the sale of securities prior to maturity, less ratable amortization of any premium and all accrued expenses to the fund. Dividends are accrued daily and may be paid either monthly or quarterly. The monthly earnings on this statement represent the estimated dividend accrued for the month for any program that distributes earnings on a quarterly basis. There is no guarantee that the estimated amount will be paid on the actual distribution date.

Current Yield is the net change, exclusive of capital changes and income other than investment income, in the value of a hypothetical fund account with a balance of one share over the seven-day base period including the statement date, expressed as a percentage of the value of one share (normally $1.00 per share) at the beginning of the seven-day period. This resulting net change in account value is then annualized by multiplying it by
98 For the Month Ending January 31, 2026
Account Statement
Consolidated Summary Statement

CITY OF EASTVALE
Investment Allocation
Investment Type Closing Market Value Percent
5,464,278.02 3.03 Asset-Backed Security
935,949.41 0.52 Bank Note
362,660.76 0.20 Certificate of Deposit
8,643,605.49 4.80 Corporate Note
8,333,676.34 4.63 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security 18,015,905.88 10.00 U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
138,363,045.75 76.82 CAMP Pool
$180,119,121.65 Total 100.00%
Portfolio Summary
and Income
Closing
Market ValuePortfolio Holdings
Cash Dividends
PFMAM Managed Account 127,613.43 41,756,075.90
CAMP Pool 0.00 138,363,045.75
$127,613.43 $180,119,121.65 Total
Maturity Distribution (Fixed Income Holdings)
Portfolio Holdings Closing Market Value Percent
138,363,045.75

0.00 0.00
362,660.76
2,455,800.16
7,123,688.20
10,272,142.61
9,633,709.89
11,908,074.28

0.00 76.83

0.00 0.00

0.20 1.36

3.95 5.70

5.35 6.61

0.00 Under 30 days
31 to 60 days
61 to 90 days
91 to 180 days
181 days to 1 year
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 4 years
4 to 5 years
Over 5 years
Total $180,119,121.65
254
100.00%
Weighted Average Days to Maturity
Sector Allocation

3.03%
ABS

0.52%
Bank Note

0.20%
Cert of Deposit

4.80%
Corporate Note

4.63%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security

10.00%
US TSY Bond / Note

76.82%
CAMP Pool
Summary Page 1PFM Asset Management
99 For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Summary Statement CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Total Cash Basis Earnings
Plus Net Realized Gains/Losses
Less Purchased Interest Related to Interest/Coupons
Interest/Dividends/Coupons Received
Earnings Reconciliation (Cash Basis) - Managed Account
Less Beginning Accrued Interest
Less Beginning Amortized Value of Securities
Less Cost of New Purchases
Plus Coupons/Dividends Received
Plus Proceeds of Maturities/Calls/Principal Payments
Plus Proceeds from Sales
Ending Accrued Interest
Ending Amortized Value of Securities
Earnings Reconciliation (Accrual Basis)
$41,715,478.57
(60,609.89)
(1,411,126.30)
1,544,896.73

0.00 (32,563.21)
$41,756,075.90
113,315.98
(4,405.99)
18,703.44
$127,613.43
Total
41,358,843.04
329,484.31
1,418,634.54
60,609.89
105,807.74
(1,549,302.72)
(41,277,902.36)
(297,697.00)
Total Accrual Basis Earnings $148,477.44
Closing Market Value
Change in Current Value
Unsettled Trades
Principal Acquisitions
Principal Dispositions
Maturities/Calls
Opening Market Value
Transaction Summary - Managed Account
_________________
_________________
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Reconciling Transactions Net Cash Contribution
Security Purchases
Principal Payments
Coupon/Interest/Dividend Income
Sale Proceeds
Maturities/Calls
Cash Transactions Summary - Managed Account

0.00 1,418,634.54
105,807.74
60,609.89
(1,549,302.72)
(338.37)

0.00 Cash Balance
$207,293.06 Closing Cash Balance
Account 20240100 Page 1PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
100
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Portfolio Summary and Statistics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Account Summary
Percent Par Value Market ValueDescription
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note 18,025,000.00 18,015,905.88 43.14 Federal Agency Commercial
Mortgage-Backed Security
8,186,374.07 8,333,676.34 19.96
Corporate Note 8,584,000.00 8,643,605.49 20.70
Certificate of Deposit 360,000.00 362,660.76 0.87
Bank Note 925,000.00 935,949.41 2.24
Asset-Backed Security 5,427,280.45 5,464,278.02 13.09 Managed Account Sub-Total 41,507,654.52 41,756,075.90 100.00% Accrued Interest 329,484.31
Total Portfolio 41,507,654.52 42,085,560.21
Unsettled Trades 0.00 0.00
Sector Allocation

13.09%
ABS

2.24%
Bank Note

0.87%
Cert of Deposit

20.70%
Corporate Note

19.96%
Federal Agency
Commercial
Mortgage-Backed
Security

43.14%
US TSY Bond / Note
0 - 6 Months 6 - 12 Months 1 - 2 Years 2 - 3 Years 3 - 4 Years 4 - 5 Years Over 5 Years

0.87%

5.88%

17.06%

24.60%

23.07%

28.52%

0.00%
Maturity Distribution Characteristics
Yield to Maturity at Cost
Yield to Maturity at Market
Weighted Average Days to Maturity 1093

4.26%

3.79%
Account 20240100 Page 2PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
101
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Issuer Summary CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Credit Quality (S&P Ratings)

5.84%
A

11.83%
A+

0.70%
A-

0.87%
A-1

63.09%
AA+

3.10%
AA-

13.49%
AAA

1.08%
NR
Issuer Summary
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
394,063.60 0.94 Adobe Inc
80,241.76 0.19 Ally Auto Receivables Trust
540,429.55 1.29 American Express Co
232,917.44 0.56 AstraZeneca PLC
323,384.16 0.77 BA Credit Card Trust
592,609.95 1.42 Bank of America Corp
613,751.98 1.47 Bank of New York Mellon Corp
600,100.83 1.44 BlackRock Inc
345,165.67 0.83 Capital One Financial Corp
39,973.40 0.10 Caterpillar Inc
130,003.38 0.31 Chase Auto Owner Trust
133,324.75 0.32 Cisco Systems Inc
1,221,273.12 2.92 Citigroup Inc
362,660.76 0.87 Cooperatieve Rabobank UA
282,513.28 0.68 Deere & Co
298,074.49 0.71 Eli Lilly & Co
7,974,007.01 19.10 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp
359,669.33 0.86 Federal National Mortgage Association
146,124.45 0.35 Fifth Third Auto Trust
92,454.47 0.22 GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receiv 401,731.60 0.96 Goldman Sachs Group Inc
384,518.16 0.92 Home Depot Inc
814,457.16 1.95 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust
805,243.27 1.93 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
1,569,593.12 3.76 JPMorgan Chase & Co
224,832.30 0.54 Kenvue Inc
290,934.30 0.70 Mastercard Inc
461,798.94 1.11 Microsoft Corp
377,064.41 0.90 Morgan Stanley
155,740.28 0.37 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Fi 560,028.00 1.34 Novartis AG
276,751.48 0.66 PACCAR Inc
Account 20240100 Page 3PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
102
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Issuer Summary CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Percentof HoldingsIssuer
Market Value
280,651.15 0.67 PepsiCo Inc
280,523.51 0.67 Target Corp
410,006.98 0.98 TotalEnergies SE
729,276.42 1.75 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust
300,127.69 0.72 Toyota Motor Corp
18,015,905.88 43.15 United States Treasury
95,262.87 0.23 USAA Auto Owner Trust
558,885.00 1.34 Wells Fargo & Co
$41,756,075.90 Total 100.00%
Account 20240100 Page 4PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
103
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027
740,067.75 745,635.08 7,795.52 730,605.47 07/07/2207/05/22Aa1AA+ 750,000.00 912828V98 2.85

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027
211,973.52 213,875.72 282.60 196,625.00 08/05/2208/03/22Aa1AA+ 220,000.00 912828ZN3 2.92

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/15/2024 4.375% 07/15/2027
166,946.51 165,951.41 339.00 166,495.31 03/20/2503/19/25Aa1AA+ 165,000.00 91282CKZ3 3.96

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027
1,030,066.80 1,033,079.01 10,913.72 995,490.23 09/06/2209/01/22Aa1AA+ 1,050,000.00 9128282R0 3.40

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027
156,459.17 154,658.07 2,178.09 153,988.87 11/03/2211/01/22Aa1AA+ 155,000.00 91282CFM8 4.27

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027
383,696.26 381,882.63 4,027.00 385,284.38 12/08/2212/06/22Aa1AA+ 380,000.00 91282CFU0 3.81

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027
721,465.72 719,157.11 976.24 647,217.19 01/06/2301/04/23Aa1AA+ 760,000.00 91282CAU5 3.91

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2027
578,391.35 575,968.90 3,856.37 577,380.86 06/05/2306/01/23Aa1AA+ 575,000.00 91282CFZ9 3.77

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027
523,209.44 521,895.68 1,781.22 524,875.00 01/31/2301/31/23Aa1AA+ 520,000.00 91282CGC9 3.66

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
213,003.00 213,493.83 4.66 197,868.16 05/18/2305/16/23Aa1AA+ 225,000.00 91282CBJ9 3.56

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
269,803.80 270,003.95 5.90 247,437.89 01/31/2301/31/23Aa1AA+ 285,000.00 91282CBJ9 3.66

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028
100,894.50 99,537.96 1,701.66 98,890.62 03/07/2303/03/23Aa1AA+ 100,000.00 91282CGP0 4.25

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
247,639.86 248,495.47 1,107.14 233,928.91 05/09/2305/08/23Aa1AA+ 260,000.00 91282CBS9 3.50

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/01/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028
39,946.88 39,919.41 359.67 39,820.31 05/01/2305/01/23Aa1AA+ 40,000.00 91282CHA2 3.60 Account 20240100 Page 5PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
104
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2025 3.750% 05/15/2028
562,297.12 561,665.91 4,524.86 561,684.38 01/22/2601/21/26Aa1AA+ 560,000.00 91282CND9 3.61

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
49,382.80 49,322.91 336.67 49,316.41 01/22/2601/21/26Aa1AA+ 50,000.00 9128285M8 3.64

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 04/30/2024 4.625% 04/30/2029
365,594.62 355,524.93 4,218.08 355,776.56 05/03/2405/02/24Aa1AA+ 355,000.00 91282CKP5 4.58

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
169,344.12 166,033.37 1,285.10 166,495.31 06/07/2406/06/24Aa1AA+ 165,000.00 91282CKT7 4.30

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029
810,799.12 794,519.54 6,152.88 796,542.19 06/06/2406/05/24Aa1AA+ 790,000.00 91282CKT7 4.31

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
168,100.19 165,064.35 619.89 165,090.23 07/09/2407/08/24Aa1AA+ 165,000.00 91282CKX8 4.24

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029
382,045.88 373,200.02 1,408.84 372,451.17 07/03/2407/02/24Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 91282CKX8 4.40

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2024 4.000% 07/31/2029
40,437.52 40,200.30 4.42 40,278.12 08/02/2408/01/24Aa1AA+ 40,000.00 91282CLC3 3.85

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/03/2024 3.625% 08/31/2029
1,087,956.25 1,091,660.93 16,809.19 1,092,256.64 09/05/2409/04/24Aa1AA+ 1,090,000.00 91282CLK5 3.58

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2024 3.500% 09/30/2029
496,816.50 498,931.86 5,961.54 498,574.22 10/03/2410/02/24Aa1AA+ 500,000.00 91282CLN9 3.56

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
274,007.88 268,450.11 2,861.29 267,996.09 11/15/2411/14/24Aa1AA+ 270,000.00 91282CLR0 4.29

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029
304,453.20 299,432.88 3,179.21 299,261.72 11/04/2411/01/24Aa1AA+ 300,000.00 91282CLR0 4.18

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/02/2024 4.125% 11/30/2029
299,378.98 295,417.15 2,106.13 295,530.08 12/06/2412/05/24Aa1AA+ 295,000.00 91282CMA6 4.08

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029
865,134.66 843,488.92 3,267.96 843,118.55 01/07/2501/06/25Aa1AA+ 845,000.00 91282CMD0 4.43 Account 20240100 Page 6PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
105
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.250% 01/31/2030
739,159.98 722,799.93 85.12 722,309.57 02/05/2502/04/25Aa1AA+ 725,000.00 91282CMG3 4.33

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/28/2030
1,313,152.10 1,302,283.27 22,121.55 1,302,742.19 03/05/2503/04/25Aa1AA+ 1,300,000.00 91282CGQ8 3.95

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030
914,014.71 908,829.72 12,331.87 909,525.00 04/02/2504/01/25Aa1AA+ 905,000.00 91282CMU2 3.89

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030
784,846.93 777,161.36 5,094.95 776,076.76 06/05/2506/04/25Aa1AA+ 785,000.00 91282CHF1 4.00

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 06/30/2025 3.875% 06/30/2030
286,347.20 285,765.18 976.24 285,857.23 07/01/2507/01/25Aa1AA+ 285,000.00 91282CNK3 3.81

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/02/2025 3.625% 08/31/2030
1,172,532.96 1,174,215.78 18,197.10 1,173,731.25 09/03/2509/02/25Aa1AA+ 1,180,000.00 91282CNX5 3.74

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030
79,462.48 79,672.94 987.91 79,656.25 10/31/2510/30/25Aa1AA+ 80,000.00 91282CPA3 3.72

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030
893,952.90 897,627.75 11,114.01 897,468.75 10/02/2510/01/25Aa1AA+ 900,000.00 91282CPA3 3.69

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/01/2025 3.500% 11/30/2030
454,070.14 457,455.01 2,786.54 457,376.56 12/05/2512/03/25Aa1AA+ 460,000.00 91282CPN5 3.63

US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2025 3.625% 12/31/2030
119,053.08 119,422.30 384.53 119,414.06 01/05/2601/02/26Aa1AA+ 120,000.00 91282CPR6 3.73 162,144.67 18,015,905.88 17,911,700.65 3.84 17,724,437.49 18,025,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
250,730.02 250,137.79 702.72 244,190.70 05/24/2305/19/23Aa1AA+ 251,945.91 3137BTUM1 4.29 FHMS K064 A2
DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027
387,643.23 382,939.24 1,047.80 367,879.69 08/18/2308/16/23Aa1AA+ 390,000.00 3137BXQY1 4.94 FHMS K065 A2
DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027
218,568.02 215,793.32 594.55 207,427.34 08/18/2308/16/23Aa1AA+ 220,000.00 3137F1G44 4.93 Account 20240100 Page 7PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
106
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K066 A2
DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027
342,080.27 336,847.41 896.14 322,628.91 08/22/2308/17/23Aa1AA+ 345,000.00 3137F2LJ3 4.97 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
324,685.55 316,719.16 1,277.46 314,354.38 09/28/2309/20/23Aa1AA+ 319,366.19 3137HAMR4 5.19 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
187,782.71 183,535.25 716.82 182,219.46 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 184,985.91 3137HAMG8 5.01 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
295,226.60 292,900.58 1,166.00 292,896.82 07/27/2307/19/23Aa1AA+ 292,904.17 3137HAD45 4.78 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
367,033.32 361,750.24 1,445.70 363,595.68 07/20/2307/13/23Aa1AA+ 360,000.00 3137HACX2 4.59 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.181% 07/01/2028
359,669.33 354,896.74 1,247.19 351,852.66 07/31/2307/18/23Aa1AA+ 357,920.53 3136BQDE6 4.58 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
105,308.53 103,917.96 456.55 103,917.69 09/28/2309/19/23Aa1AA+ 103,918.21 3137HAMN3 5.27 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
381,495.75 371,942.81 1,453.13 369,452.63 09/14/2309/07/23Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 3137HAMH6 4.99 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
387,360.22 375,312.23 1,501.00 371,664.32 10/19/2310/11/23Aa1AA+ 380,000.00 3137HAQ74 5.25 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
291,386.28 279,685.22 1,151.88 275,913.35 10/31/2310/25/23Aa1AA+ 285,000.00 3137HAST4 5.60 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
377,790.35 367,469.09 1,480.00 365,577.39 09/28/2309/20/23Aa1AA+ 370,000.00 3137HAMS2 5.07 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
149,209.06 144,753.94 612.50 144,580.81 11/21/2311/14/23Aa1AA+ 145,000.00 3137HB3D4 5.14 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
214,934.58 209,643.68 850.50 209,396.67 12/07/2311/28/23Aa1AA+ 210,000.00 3137HB3G7 4.93 FHMS K512 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
179,846.75 176,098.06 729.64 176,749.16 12/21/2312/11/23Aa1AA+ 175,113.94 3137HBCF9 4.79 Account 20240100 Page 8PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
107
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
FHMS K513 A2
DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028
219,542.95 216,322.33 846.38 217,147.64 01/18/2401/10/24Aa1AA+ 215,000.00 3137HBFY5 4.50 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
223,718.88 221,366.35 838.20 222,199.78 02/08/2402/01/24Aa1AA+ 220,000.00 3137HBLV4 4.34 FHMS K517 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029
347,869.70 341,443.36 1,494.94 345,045.31 03/14/2403/05/24Aa1AA+ 335,000.00 3137HC2C5 4.67 FHMS K515 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029
389,342.63 381,415.22 1,687.50 385,102.50 02/22/2402/14/24Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 3137HBPD0 4.79 FHMS K516 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029
390,333.38 382,197.41 1,711.56 386,248.88 03/07/2402/29/24Aa1AA+ 375,000.00 3137HBPM0 4.79 FHMS K524 A2
DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029
327,329.92 321,419.11 1,258.67 321,965.12 07/25/2407/16/24Aa1AA+ 320,000.00 3137HDV56 4.58 FHMS K522 A2
DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
374,217.85 365,219.21 1,461.79 365,218.12 06/13/2406/05/24Aa1AA+ 365,219.21 3137HDJJ0 4.80 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
356,323.80 352,381.81 1,325.04 353,273.90 08/15/2408/07/24Aa1AA+ 350,000.00 3137HDXL9 4.33 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
210,438.24 208,113.44 818.46 209,097.34 10/16/2410/08/24Aa1AA+ 205,000.00 3137HH6C0 4.34 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
410,658.00 401,644.29 1,597.33 402,082.80 11/27/2411/19/24Aa1AA+ 400,000.00 3137HHJL6 4.67 FHMS K546 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.361% 05/01/2030
263,150.42 263,616.21 944.88 263,896.36 09/18/2509/09/25Aa1AA+ 260,000.00 3137HN4R6 4.01 31,314.33 8,333,676.34 8,179,481.46 4.79 8,135,575.41 8,186,374.07 Security Type Sub-Total Corporate Note

MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026
461,798.94 465,601.58 5,363.00 470,156.85 02/25/2202/23/22AaaAAA 465,000.00 594918BR4 2.14

PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP
DTD 08/10/2023 5.050% 08/10/2026
276,751.48 275,197.98 6,596.56 276,130.25 08/11/2308/09/23A1A+ 275,000.00 69371RS56 4.90 Account 20240100 Page 9PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
108
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Corporate Note

BANK OF AMERICA NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/18/2023 5.526% 08/18/2026
302,346.00 299,509.25 7,506.15 297,474.00 10/24/2310/23/23Aa2A+ 300,000.00 06428CAA2 5.85

TARGET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
49,214.65 49,983.67 43.33 49,915.00 01/24/2201/19/22A2A 50,000.00 87612EBM7 1.99

TARGET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
231,308.86 234,972.36 203.67 234,856.65 01/31/2201/27/22A2A 235,000.00 87612EBM7 1.96

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
324,765.21 330,194.35 93.96 331,062.60 01/28/2201/26/22Aa3A 330,000.00 06406RBA4 1.98

ADOBE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027
394,063.60 392,548.05 4,300.00 369,240.00 12/15/2212/13/22A1A+ 400,000.00 00724PAC3 4.20

GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/21/2024 5.414% 05/21/2027
401,731.60 400,780.03 4,210.89 402,516.00 05/22/2505/21/25A1A+ 400,000.00 38151LAG5 5.08

HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027
384,518.16 382,305.97 4,155.67 368,000.10 01/27/2301/25/23A2A 390,000.00 437076BT8 4.15

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2017 3.442% 02/07/2028
239,032.32 235,940.38 3,992.72 233,169.60 08/07/2408/06/24Aa3A 240,000.00 06406RAB3 4.33

KENVUE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 10/17/2023 5.050% 03/22/2028
224,832.30 224,090.87 3,981.08 225,194.20 06/30/2506/27/25A2A 220,000.00 49177JAF9 4.12

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028
142,639.56 140,413.73 2,144.84 140,933.80 06/04/2406/03/24A1A 140,000.00 46647PEE2 5.38

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
128,415.13 124,908.63 292.19 124,813.75 07/14/2307/11/23A1A 125,000.00 24422EXB0 4.98

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
154,098.15 151,000.93 350.63 152,037.00 07/17/2307/13/23A1A 150,000.00 24422EXB0 4.64

NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028
155,740.28 154,850.26 2,787.42 154,826.40 08/25/2508/19/25A2NR 155,000.00 63743HFZ0 4.19

CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
382,382.76 365,000.00 7,177.99 365,000.00 09/29/2309/26/23Aa3A+ 365,000.00 17325FBB3 5.80 Account 20240100 Page 10PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
109
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Corporate Note

CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028
434,763.96 420,003.30 8,161.27 423,026.10 05/03/2405/01/24Aa3A+ 415,000.00 17325FBB3 5.30

BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.979% 01/24/2029
290,263.95 287,266.97 275.92 288,157.80 04/02/2504/01/25A1A- 285,000.00 06051GMK2 4.66

CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
133,324.75 133,195.80 2,714.65 133,412.50 11/13/2511/12/25A1AA- 130,000.00 17275RBR2 3.99

ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029
232,917.44 231,294.75 4,740.20 232,087.07 06/27/2506/26/25A1A+ 227,000.00 04636NAL7 4.18

BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
35,816.45 34,958.85 626.01 34,936.65 03/14/2403/05/24Aa3AA- 35,000.00 09290DAA9 4.74

BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029
283,461.58 276,151.89 4,954.45 275,714.72 04/11/2404/09/24Aa3AA- 277,000.00 09290DAA9 4.81

MASTERCARD INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/31/2019 2.950% 06/01/2029
290,934.30 282,877.89 1,475.00 275,595.00 06/27/2406/26/24Aa3A+ 300,000.00 57636QAM6 4.82

PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/17/2024 4.500% 07/17/2029
188,674.84 184,795.35 323.75 184,713.25 07/17/2407/15/24A1A+ 185,000.00 713448FX1 4.53

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
50,869.10 49,926.15 1,086.94 49,898.50 08/09/2408/06/24A1A+ 50,000.00 89236TMK8 4.60

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
116,998.93 114,904.12 2,499.97 114,867.75 08/09/2408/07/24A1A+ 115,000.00 89236TMK8 4.58

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP
DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029
132,259.66 129,611.32 2,826.06 129,465.70 08/09/2408/08/24A1A+ 130,000.00 89236TMK8 4.64

ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
65,677.43 64,896.45 1,266.42 64,857.65 08/14/2408/12/24Aa3A+ 65,000.00 532457CQ9 4.25

ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029
232,397.06 230,244.90 4,481.17 230,335.80 08/14/2408/13/24Aa3A+ 230,000.00 532457CQ9 4.17

BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/22/2026 4.026% 01/22/2030
49,954.45 50,000.00 50.33 50,000.00 01/22/2601/14/26Aa3A 50,000.00 06406RCG0 4.03 Account 20240100 Page 11PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
110
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Corporate Note

PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030
91,976.31 89,875.98 2,001.00 89,848.80 02/07/2502/05/25A1A+ 90,000.00 713448GB8 4.64

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE)
DTD 04/22/2024 5.581% 04/22/2030
468,845.10 461,527.43 6,906.49 463,999.50 04/28/2504/25/25A1A 450,000.00 46647PEG7 4.87

BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030
280,822.80 277,948.57 1,820.00 275,166.00 06/27/2506/26/25Aa3AA- 300,000.00 09247XAQ4 4.31

NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/05/2025 4.100% 11/05/2030
560,028.00 558,395.13 5,484.89 558,320.00 11/05/2511/03/25Aa3AA- 560,000.00 66989HAY4 4.17

CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 01/08/2026 4.150% 01/08/2031
39,973.40 39,985.85 106.06 39,985.60 01/08/2601/05/26A2A 40,000.00 14913UBH2 4.16

TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031
175,002.98 175,000.00 371.70 175,000.00 01/13/2601/06/26Aa3A+ 175,000.00 89158TAA7 4.25

TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031
235,004.00 235,550.37 499.14 235,554.60 01/13/2601/07/26Aa3A+ 235,000.00 89158TAA7 4.20 105,871.52 8,643,605.49 8,555,709.11 4.34 8,520,269.19 8,584,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Certificate of Deposit

COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 07/20/2023 5.080% 07/17/2026
362,660.76 360,000.00 711.20 360,000.00 07/20/2307/17/23P-1A-1 360,000.00 21684LGS5 5.08 711.20 362,660.76 360,000.00 5.08 360,000.00 360,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Bank Note

WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026
558,885.00 554,867.21 14,619.63 554,239.65 08/22/2308/18/23Aa2A+ 555,000.00 94988J6D4 5.50

MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/30/2024 5.504% 05/26/2028
377,064.41 370,334.92 3,676.98 370,780.70 05/31/2405/30/24Aa3A+ 370,000.00 61690U8B9 5.45 18,296.61 935,949.41 925,202.13 5.48 925,020.35 925,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total Account 20240100 Page 12PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
111
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Asset-Backed Security
HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
114,685.21 113,874.79 222.49 113,862.02 08/22/2308/15/23NRAAA 113,885.51 43815QAC1 5.42 TAOT 2023-C A3
DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
43,289.66 43,012.24 98.65 43,007.12 08/15/2308/08/23NRAAA 43,016.84 89231FAD2 5.17 TAOT 2023-D A3
DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
58,407.61 57,776.13 142.27 57,773.32 11/14/2311/07/23NRAAA 57,779.55 89239FAD4 5.54 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
146,124.45 144,881.81 356.10 144,877.41 08/23/2308/15/23AaaAAA 144,886.39 31680EAD3 5.53 CHAIT 2023-A1 A
DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028
302,491.50 299,953.74 688.00 299,916.84 09/15/2309/07/23NRAAA 300,000.00 161571HT4 5.17 AMXCA 2023-3 A
DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028
312,729.55 309,992.42 720.58 309,986.14 09/19/2309/12/23NRAAA 310,000.00 02582JKD1 5.23 HART 2023-C A3
DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
76,461.41 75,885.08 186.86 75,880.81 11/13/2311/03/23NRAAA 75,890.79 44918CAD4 5.54 BACCT 2023-A2 A2
DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028
136,312.34 134,989.48 298.80 134,981.87 12/14/2312/07/23AaaNR 135,000.00 05522RDH8 4.98 GMCAR 2024-1 A3
DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
26,996.41 26,818.06 54.20 26,815.98 01/17/2401/09/24AaaNR 26,821.37 36268GAD7 4.85 CHAIT 2024-A1 A
DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/15/2029
332,713.92 329,969.05 674.67 329,949.74 01/31/2401/24/24NRAAA 330,000.00 161571HV9 4.60 HAROT 2025-1 A3
DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029
288,088.26 284,993.32 361.79 284,991.22 02/11/2502/04/25NRAAA 285,000.00 43814VAC1 4.57 HART 2025-A A3
DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029
246,895.32 244,970.69 470.40 244,963.86 03/12/2503/04/25NRAAA 245,000.00 44935CAD3 4.32 TAOT 2025-B A3
DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029
151,176.75 149,993.20 289.33 149,991.41 04/30/2504/24/25NRAAA 150,000.00 89231HAD8 4.34 HART 2025-B A3
DTD 06/11/2025 4.360% 12/17/2029
95,963.97 94,992.56 184.09 94,991.42 06/11/2506/03/25NRAAA 95,000.00 44935XAD7 4.36 Account 20240100 Page 13PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
112
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Asset-Backed Security
USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
95,262.87 94,992.50 166.78 94,991.66 10/09/2510/02/25AaaAAA 95,000.00 90327HAC3 3.95 HAROT 2025-3 A3
DTD 08/12/2025 4.040% 02/21/2030
231,031.55 229,995.70 258.11 229,995.19 08/12/2508/05/25AaaAAA 230,000.00 43813QAD1 4.04 ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
80,241.76 79,989.37 140.80 79,988.58 10/16/2510/07/25NRAAA 80,000.00 02008KAC7 3.96 TAOT 2025-C A3
DTD 07/30/2025 4.110% 03/15/2030
166,018.71 164,984.38 301.40 164,982.61 07/30/2507/22/25AaaAAA 165,000.00 89238VAD0 4.11 HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
200,248.80 199,970.56 344.89 199,967.36 09/17/2509/09/25NRAAA 200,000.00 44935JAD8 3.88 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
65,458.06 64,991.75 115.92 64,990.43 05/14/2505/06/25AaaAAA 65,000.00 362549AD9 4.28 BACCT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/12/2025 4.310% 05/15/2030
187,071.82 185,000.00 354.38 184,999.30 06/12/2506/05/25NRAAA 185,000.00 05522RDK1 4.31 HAROT 2025-4 A3
DTD 11/12/2025 3.980% 06/17/2030
180,652.14 179,966.79 318.40 179,965.15 11/12/2511/05/25NRAAA 180,000.00 43814XAD5 3.98 TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
210,266.49 209,977.19 358.40 209,975.85 10/23/2510/15/25NRAAA 210,000.00 89231GAD0 3.84 CCCIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/26/2025 4.300% 06/21/2030
404,126.40 399,903.38 1,911.11 399,891.48 06/26/2506/18/25AaaAAA 400,000.00 17305EHA6 4.31 COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850% 07/15/2030
95,038.67 94,980.97 162.56 94,979.88 11/05/2510/28/25NRAAA 95,000.00 14043YAD7 3.85 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
227,700.00 224,970.86 430.00 224,967.58 07/22/2507/15/25NRAAA 225,000.00 02582JKV1 4.30 CHAIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 07/25/2025 4.160% 07/15/2030
322,903.04 319,994.80 591.64 319,993.57 07/25/2507/18/25NRAAA 320,000.00 161571HZ0 4.16 COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/15/2030
250,127.00 249,956.64 424.44 249,952.60 09/16/2509/09/25NRAAA 250,000.00 14041NGF2 3.82 Account 20240100 Page 14PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
113
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Detail of Securities Held CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Dated Date/Coupon/Maturity CUSIP Rating Rating Date Date Cost at Cost Interest Cost Value Security Type/Description S&P Moody's Original YTM Accrued Amortized MarketTrade Settle Par
Asset-Backed Security
TAOT 2026-A A3
DTD 01/21/2026 3.860% 09/16/2030
100,117.20 99,991.54 107.22 99,991.48 01/21/2601/13/26AaaAAA 100,000.00 89240KAD0 3.86 HART 2025-D A3
DTD 11/12/2025 3.990% 09/16/2030
185,673.77 184,985.18 328.07 184,984.35 11/12/2511/05/25NRAAA 185,000.00 44891XAD9 3.99 CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
130,003.38 129,995.51 83.63 129,994.85 10/29/2510/17/25AaaNR 130,000.00 16144MAD6 3.86 11,145.98 5,464,278.02 5,426,749.69 4.41 5,426,601.08 5,427,280.45 Security Type Sub-Total 41,507,654.52 41,091,903.52 4.26 329,484.31 41,358,843.04 41,756,075.90 Managed Account Sub-Total $41,507,654.52 $41,091,903.52 $329,484.31 $41,358,843.04 $41,756,075.90 4.26% $42,085,560.21
$329,484.31
Total Investments
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total
Account 20240100 Page 15PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
114
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(5,567.33) 9,462.28 740,067.75 98.68 JPMorgan 750,000.00 912828V98US TREASURY N/B DTD 02/15/2017 2.250% 02/15/2027

3.56 1.00
(1,902.20) 15,348.52 211,973.52 96.35 Nomura 220,000.00 912828ZN3US TREASURY N/B DTD 04/30/2020 0.500% 04/30/2027

3.53 1.22
995.10 451.20 166,946.51 101.18 BNP Sec 165,000.00 91282CKZ3US TREASURY N/B DTD 07/15/2024 4.375% 07/15/2027

3.53 1.40
(3,012.21) 34,576.57 1,030,066.80 98.10 HSBC 1,050,000.00 9128282R0US TREASURY N/B DTD 08/15/2017 2.250% 08/15/2027

3.53 1.48
1,801.10 2,470.30 156,459.17 100.94 BOFAML 155,000.00 91282CFM8US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/30/2022 4.125% 09/30/2027

3.53 1.58
1,813.63 (1,588.12) 383,696.26 100.97 Nomura 380,000.00 91282CFU0US TREASURY N/B DTD 10/31/2022 4.125% 10/31/2027

3.54 1.66
2,308.61 74,248.53 721,465.72 94.93 WellsFar 760,000.00 91282CAU5US TREASURY N/B DTD 11/02/2020 0.500% 10/31/2027

3.52 1.71
2,422.45 1,010.49 578,391.35 100.59 Citigrou 575,000.00 91282CFZ9US TREASURY N/B DTD 11/30/2022 3.875% 11/30/2027

3.54 1.74
1,313.76 (1,665.56) 523,209.44 100.62 WellsFar 520,000.00 91282CGC9US TREASURY N/B DTD 01/03/2023 3.875% 12/31/2027

3.54 1.83
(490.83) 15,134.84 213,003.00 94.67 GoldmanS 225,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028

3.54 1.95
(200.15) 22,365.91 269,803.80 94.67 Nomura 285,000.00 91282CBJ9US TREASURY N/B DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028

3.54 1.95
1,356.54 2,003.88 100,894.50 100.89 TD Secur 100,000.00 91282CGP0US TREASURY N/B DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/29/2028

3.55 1.95
(855.61) 13,710.95 247,639.86 95.25 BNPPSA 260,000.00 91282CBS9US TREASURY N/B DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028

3.56 2.09

27.47 126.57 39,946.88 99.87 BOFAML 40,000.00 91282CHA2US TREASURY N/B DTD 05/01/2023 3.500% 04/30/2028

3.56 2.12
631.21 612.74 562,297.12 100.41 Citigrou 560,000.00 91282CND9US TREASURY N/B DTD 05/15/2025 3.750% 05/15/2028

3.56 2.16

59.89 66.39 49,382.80 98.77 MorganSt 50,000.00 9128285M8US TREASURY N/B DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028

3.59 2.63
10,069.69 9,818.06 365,594.62 102.98 WellsFar 355,000.00 91282CKP5US TREASURY N/B DTD 04/30/2024 4.625% 04/30/2029

3.64 2.97
Account 20240100 Page 16PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
115
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
3,310.75 2,848.81 169,344.12 102.63 JPMorgan 165,000.00 91282CKT7US TREASURY N/B DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029

3.65 3.06
16,279.58 14,256.93 810,799.12 102.63 JPMorgan 790,000.00 91282CKT7US TREASURY N/B DTD 05/31/2024 4.500% 05/31/2029

3.65 3.06
3,035.84 3,009.96 168,100.19 101.88 Citigrou 165,000.00 91282CKX8US TREASURY N/B DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029

3.66 3.15
8,845.86 9,594.71 382,045.88 101.88 HSBC 375,000.00 91282CKX8US TREASURY N/B DTD 07/01/2024 4.250% 06/30/2029

3.66 3.15
237.22 159.40 40,437.52 101.09 Citigrou 40,000.00 91282CLC3US TREASURY N/B DTD 07/31/2024 4.000% 07/31/2029

3.66 3.24
(3,704.68)(4,300.39) 1,087,956.25 99.81 Citigrou 1,090,000.00 91282CLK5US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/03/2024 3.625% 08/31/2029

3.68 3.28
(2,115.36)(1,757.72) 496,816.50 99.36 TD Secur 500,000.00 91282CLN9US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/30/2024 3.500% 09/30/2029

3.69 3.37
5,557.77 6,011.79 274,007.88 101.48 TD Secur 270,000.00 91282CLR0US TREASURY N/B DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029

3.70 3.42
5,020.32 5,191.48 304,453.20 101.48 HSBC 300,000.00 91282CLR0US TREASURY N/B DTD 10/31/2024 4.125% 10/31/2029

3.70 3.42
3,961.83 3,848.90 299,378.98 101.48 WellsFar 295,000.00 91282CMA6US TREASURY N/B DTD 12/02/2024 4.125% 11/30/2029

3.70 3.50
21,645.74 22,016.11 865,134.66 102.38 BNP Sec 845,000.00 91282CMD0US TREASURY N/B DTD 12/31/2024 4.375% 12/31/2029

3.71 3.57
16,360.05 16,850.41 739,159.98 101.95 BNP Sec 725,000.00 91282CMG3US TREASURY N/B DTD 01/31/2025 4.250% 01/31/2030

3.72 3.66
10,868.83 10,409.91 1,313,152.10 101.01 Nomura 1,300,000.00 91282CGQ8US TREASURY N/B DTD 02/28/2023 4.000% 02/28/2030

3.73 3.68
5,184.99 4,489.71 914,014.71 101.00 BNP Sec 905,000.00 91282CMU2US TREASURY N/B DTD 03/31/2025 4.000% 03/31/2030

3.74 3.76
7,685.57 8,770.17 784,846.93 99.98 HSBC 785,000.00 91282CHF1US TREASURY N/B DTD 05/31/2023 3.750% 05/31/2030

3.75 3.95
582.02 489.97 286,347.20 100.47 Citigrou 285,000.00 91282CNK3US TREASURY N/B DTD 06/30/2025 3.875% 06/30/2030

3.76 4.02
(1,682.82)(1,198.29) 1,172,532.96 99.37 Nomura 1,180,000.00 91282CNX5US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/02/2025 3.625% 08/31/2030

3.78 4.13
Account 20240100 Page 17PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
116
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note
(210.46)(193.77) 79,462.48 99.33 JPMorgan 80,000.00 91282CPA3US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030

3.78 4.21
(3,674.85)(3,515.85) 893,952.90 99.33 Citigrou 900,000.00 91282CPA3US TREASURY N/B DTD 09/30/2025 3.625% 09/30/2030

3.78 4.21
(3,384.87)(3,306.42) 454,070.14 98.71 GoldmanS 460,000.00 91282CPN5US TREASURY N/B DTD 12/01/2025 3.500% 11/30/2030

3.79 4.39
(369.22)(360.98) 119,053.08 99.21 HSBC 120,000.00 91282CPR6US TREASURY N/B DTD 12/31/2025 3.625% 12/31/2030

3.80 4.46
291,468.39 3.66 104,205.23 18,015,905.88 18,025,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.99 Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
592.23 6,539.32 250,730.02 99.52 Citigrou 251,945.91 3137BTUM1FHMS K061 A2 DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026

3.73 0.73
4,703.99 19,763.54 387,643.23 99.40 MorganSt 390,000.00 3137BXQY1FHMS K064 A2 DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027

3.66 0.95
2,774.70 11,140.68 218,568.02 99.35 MorganSt 220,000.00 3137F1G44FHMS K065 A2 DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027

3.66 1.10
5,232.86 19,451.36 342,080.27 99.15 CantorFi 345,000.00 3137F2LJ3FHMS K066 A2 DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027

3.67 1.19
7,966.39 10,331.17 324,685.55 101.67 BOFAML 319,366.19 3137HAMR4FHMS K507 A1 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028

3.78 1.85
4,247.46 5,563.25 187,782.71 101.51 WellsFar 184,985.91 3137HAMG8FHMS K506 A1 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028

3.74 1.90
2,326.02 2,329.78 295,226.60 100.79 JPMorgan 292,904.17 3137HAD45FHMS KJ46 A1 DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028

3.99 1.34
5,283.08 3,437.64 367,033.32 101.95 JPMorgan 360,000.00 3137HACX2FHMS K505 A2 DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028

3.80 2.12
4,772.59 7,816.67 359,669.33 100.49 JPMorgan 357,920.53 3136BQDE6FNA 2023-M6 A2 DTD 07/01/2023 4.181% 07/01/2028

3.88 2.27
1,390.57 1,390.84 105,308.53 101.34 JPMorgan 103,918.21 3137HAMN3FHMS KJ47 A1 DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028

3.97 1.24
9,552.94 12,043.12 381,495.75 101.73 WellsFar 375,000.00 3137HAMH6FHMS K506 A2 DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028

3.81 2.28
Account 20240100 Page 18PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
117
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
Federal Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Security
12,047.99 15,695.90 387,360.22 101.94 BMO 380,000.00 3137HAQ74FHMS K508 A2 DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028

3.82 2.31
11,701.06 15,472.93 291,386.28 102.24 MorganSt 285,000.00 3137HAST4FHMS K509 A2 DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028

3.83 2.39
10,321.26 12,212.96 377,790.35 102.11 BOFAML 370,000.00 3137HAMS2FHMS K507 A2 DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028

3.82 2.34
4,455.12 4,628.25 149,209.06 102.90 JPMorgan 145,000.00 3137HB3D4FHMS K510 A2 DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028

3.80 2.42
5,290.90 5,537.91 214,934.58 102.35 BOFAML 210,000.00 3137HB3G7FHMS K511 A2 DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028

3.83 2.46
3,748.69 3,097.59 179,846.75 102.70 JPMorgan 175,113.94 3137HBCF9FHMS K512 A2 DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028

3.83 2.46
3,220.62 2,395.31 219,542.95 102.11 BMO 215,000.00 3137HBFY5FHMS K513 A2 DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028

3.84 2.59
2,352.53 1,519.10 223,718.88 101.69 JPMorgan 220,000.00 3137HBLV4FHMS K514 A2 DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028

3.84 2.55
6,426.34 2,824.39 347,869.70 103.84 BOFAML 335,000.00 3137HC2C5FHMS K517 A2 DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029

3.88 2.70
7,927.41 4,240.13 389,342.63 103.82 WellsFar 375,000.00 3137HBPD0FHMS K515 A2 DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029

3.87 2.60
8,135.97 4,084.50 390,333.38 104.09 MorganSt 375,000.00 3137HBPM0FHMS K516 A2 DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029

3.87 2.64
5,910.81 5,364.80 327,329.92 102.29 PIER 320,000.00 3137HDV56FHMS K524 A2 DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029

3.90 2.98
8,998.64 8,999.73 374,217.85 102.46 MorganSt 365,219.21 3137HDJJ0FHMS K522 A2 DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029

3.89 2.86
3,941.99 3,049.90 356,323.80 101.81 BMO 350,000.00 3137HDXL9FHMS K526 A2 DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029

3.92 3.14
2,324.80 1,340.90 210,438.24 102.65 MorganSt 205,000.00 3137HH6C0FHMS K529 A2 DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029

3.93 3.25
9,013.71 8,575.20 410,658.00 102.66 JPMorgan 400,000.00 3137HHJL6FHMS K530 A2 DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029

3.93 3.27
(465.79)(745.94) 263,150.42 101.21 BMO 260,000.00 3137HN4R6FHMS K546 A2 DTD 09/01/2025 4.361% 05/01/2030

4.01 3.81
Account 20240100 Page 19PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
118
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
198,100.93 3.84 154,194.88 8,333,676.34 8,186,374.07 Security Type Sub-Total 2.31 Corporate Note
(3,802.64)(8,357.91) 461,798.94 99.31 05/08/26Citigrou 465,000.00 594918BR4MICROSOFT CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 08/08/2016 2.400% 08/08/2026

3.75 0.50
1,553.50 621.23 276,751.48 100.64 TD Secur 275,000.00 69371RS56PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP DTD 08/10/2023 5.050% 08/10/2026

3.81 0.50
2,836.75 4,872.00 302,346.00 100.78 07/17/26Citigrou 300,000.00 06428CAA2BANK OF AMERICA NA (CALLABLE) DTD 08/18/2023 5.526% 08/18/2026

4.06 0.44
(769.02)(700.35) 49,214.65 98.43 12/15/26Citigrou 50,000.00 87612EBM7TARGET CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027

3.64 0.93
(3,663.50)(3,547.79) 231,308.86 98.43 12/15/26Barclays 235,000.00 87612EBM7TARGET CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027

3.64 0.93
(5,429.14)(6,297.39) 324,765.21 98.41 12/24/26JPMorgan 330,000.00 06406RBA4BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027

3.70 0.96
1,515.55 24,823.60 394,063.60 98.52 12/01/26CSFirstB 400,000.00 00724PAC3ADOBE INC (CALLABLE) DTD 02/03/2020 2.150% 02/01/2027

3.68 0.97
951.57 (784.40) 401,731.60 100.43 05/21/26WellsFar 400,000.00 38151LAG5GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (CALLABLE) DTD 05/21/2024 5.414% 05/21/2027

4.30 0.30
2,212.19 16,518.06 384,518.16 98.59 06/14/27Citigrou 390,000.00 437076BT8HOME DEPOT INC (CALLABLE) DTD 09/14/2017 2.800% 09/14/2027

3.70 1.51
3,091.94 5,862.72 239,032.32 99.60 02/07/27Citigrou 240,000.00 06406RAB3BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 02/07/2017 3.442% 02/07/2028

4.42 0.97
741.43 (361.90) 224,832.30 102.20 02/22/28JPMorgan 220,000.00 49177JAF9KENVUE INC (CALLABLE) DTD 10/17/2023 5.050% 03/22/2028

3.97 1.93
2,225.83 1,705.76 142,639.56 101.89 04/22/27JANE 140,000.00 46647PEE2JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 04/22/2024 5.571% 04/22/2028

4.25 1.16
3,506.50 3,601.38 128,415.13 102.73 Citigrou 125,000.00 24422EXB0JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028

3.77 2.29
3,097.22 2,061.15 154,098.15 102.73 SGSA 150,000.00 24422EXB0JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028

3.77 2.29
890.02 913.88 155,740.28 100.48 07/25/28MUFG 155,000.00 63743HFZ0NATIONAL RURAL UTIL COOP (CALLABLE) DTD 08/25/2025 4.150% 08/25/2028

3.95 2.33
17,382.76 17,382.76 382,382.76 104.76 08/29/28Citigrou 365,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028

3.90 2.35
Account 20240100 Page 20PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
119
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
Corporate Note
14,760.66 11,737.86 434,763.96 104.76 08/29/28Citigrou 415,000.00 17325FBB3CITIBANK NA (CALLABLE) DTD 09/29/2023 5.803% 09/29/2028

3.90 2.35
2,996.98 2,106.15 290,263.95 101.85 01/24/28Citigrou 285,000.00 06051GMK2BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/24/2025 4.979% 01/24/2029

4.16 1.87
128.95 (87.75) 133,324.75 102.56 01/26/29Citigrou 130,000.00 17275RBR2CISCO SYSTEMS INC (CALLABLE) DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029

3.96 2.74
1,622.69 830.37 232,917.44 102.61 01/26/29JPMorgan 227,000.00 04636NAL7ASTRAZENECA FINANCE LLC (CALLABLE) DTD 02/26/2024 4.850% 02/26/2029

3.94 2.74
857.60 879.80 35,816.45 102.33 02/14/29Citigrou 35,000.00 09290DAA9BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE) DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029

3.90 2.79
7,309.69 7,746.86 283,461.58 102.33 02/14/29GoldmanS 277,000.00 09290DAA9BLACKROCK FUNDING INC (CALLABLE) DTD 03/14/2024 4.700% 03/14/2029

3.90 2.79
8,056.41 15,339.30 290,934.30 96.98 03/01/29Citigrou 300,000.00 57636QAM6MASTERCARD INC (CALLABLE) DTD 05/31/2019 2.950% 06/01/2029

3.92 3.08
3,879.49 3,961.59 188,674.84 101.99 06/17/29Citigrou 185,000.00 713448FX1PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) DTD 07/17/2024 4.500% 07/17/2029

3.88 3.14
942.95 970.60 50,869.10 101.74 MIZU 50,000.00 89236TMK8TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029

4.02 3.17
2,094.81 2,131.18 116,998.93 101.74 MorganSt 115,000.00 89236TMK8TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029

4.02 3.17
2,648.34 2,793.96 132,259.66 101.74 LoopCapM 130,000.00 89236TMK8TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP DTD 08/09/2024 4.550% 08/09/2029

4.02 3.17
780.98 819.78 65,677.43 101.04 07/14/29MorganSt 65,000.00 532457CQ9ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029

3.88 3.16
2,152.16 2,061.26 232,397.06 101.04 07/14/29JPMorgan 230,000.00 532457CQ9ELI LILLY & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 08/14/2024 4.200% 08/14/2029

3.88 3.16
(45.55)(45.55) 49,954.45 99.91 01/22/29MorganSt 50,000.00 06406RCG0BANK OF NY MELLON CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 01/22/2026 4.026% 01/22/2030

4.10 2.82
2,100.33 2,127.51 91,976.31 102.20 01/07/30MorganSt 90,000.00 713448GB8PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE) DTD 02/07/2025 4.600% 02/07/2030

4.00 3.54
7,317.67 4,845.60 468,845.10 104.19 04/22/29BOFAML 450,000.00 46647PEG7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO (CALLABLE) DTD 04/22/2024 5.581% 04/22/2030

4.32 2.90
2,874.23 5,656.80 280,822.80 93.61 01/30/30FTNF 300,000.00 09247XAQ4BLACKROCK INC (CALLABLE) DTD 01/27/2020 2.400% 04/30/2030

4.05 3.93
Account 20240100 Page 21PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
120
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
Corporate Note
1,632.87 1,708.00 560,028.00 100.01 10/05/30JPMorgan 560,000.00 66989HAY4NOVARTIS CAPITAL CORP (CALLABLE) DTD 11/05/2025 4.100% 11/05/2030

4.10 4.23
(12.45)(12.20) 39,973.40 99.93 Citigrou 40,000.00 14913UBH2CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE DTD 01/08/2026 4.150% 01/08/2031

4.16 4.42

2.98 2.98 175,002.98 100.00 12/13/30Citigrou 175,000.00 89158TAA7TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC (CALLABLE) DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031

4.25 4.40
(546.37)(550.60) 235,004.00 100.00 12/13/30SMBC 235,000.00 89158TAA7TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC (CALLABLE) DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031

4.25 4.40
123,336.30 3.97 87,896.38 8,643,605.49 8,584,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 2.20 Certificate of Deposit
2,660.76 2,660.76 362,660.76 100.74 RABO UA 360,000.00 21684LGS5COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY DTD 07/20/2023 5.080% 07/17/2026

3.44 0.45
2,660.76 3.44 2,660.76 362,660.76 360,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.45 Bank Note
4,017.79 4,645.35 558,885.00 100.70 07/07/26JPMorgan 555,000.00 94988J6D4WELLS FARGO BANK NA (CALLABLE) DTD 08/09/2023 5.450% 08/07/2026

4.07 0.41
6,729.49 6,283.71 377,064.41 101.91 05/26/27MorganSt 370,000.00 61690U8B9MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA (CALLABLE) DTD 05/30/2024 5.504% 05/26/2028

4.22 1.25
10,929.06 4.13 10,747.28 935,949.41 925,000.00 Security Type Sub-Total 0.75 Asset-Backed Security
810.42 823.19 114,685.21 100.70 BOFAML 113,885.51 43815QAC1HAROT 2023-3 A3 DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028

4.00 0.48
277.42 282.54 43,289.66 100.63 BNPPSA 43,016.84 89231FAD2TAOT 2023-C A3 DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028

3.94 0.50
631.48 634.29 58,407.61 101.09 JPMorgan 57,779.55 89239FAD4TAOT 2023-D A3 DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028

4.05 0.70
1,242.64 1,247.04 146,124.45 100.85 JPMorgan 144,886.39 31680EAD3FITAT 2023-1 A3 DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028

4.08 0.56
Account 20240100 Page 22PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
121
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
Asset-Backed Security
2,537.76 2,574.66 302,491.50 100.83 JPMorgan 300,000.00 161571HT4CHAIT 2023-A1 A DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028

3.84 0.60
2,737.13 2,743.41 312,729.55 100.88 Citigrou 310,000.00 02582JKD1AMXCA 2023-3 A DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028

3.83 0.60
576.33 580.60 76,461.41 100.75 BNPPSA 75,890.79 44918CAD4HART 2023-C A3 DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028

4.42 0.63
1,322.86 1,330.47 136,312.34 100.97 BOFAML 135,000.00 05522RDH8BACCT 2023-A2 A2 DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028

3.76 0.76
178.35 180.43 26,996.41 100.65 Barclays 26,821.37 36268GAD7GMCAR 2024-1 A3 DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028

3.88 0.64
2,744.87 2,764.18 332,713.92 100.82 JPMorgan 330,000.00 161571HV9CHAIT 2024-A1 A DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/15/2029

3.75 0.92
3,094.94 3,097.04 288,088.26 101.08 MUFG 285,000.00 43814VAC1HAROT 2025-1 A3 DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029

3.80 1.33
1,924.63 1,931.46 246,895.32 100.77 Barclays 245,000.00 44935CAD3HART 2025-A A3 DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029

3.81 1.41
1,183.55 1,185.34 151,176.75 100.78 Barclays 150,000.00 89231HAD8TAOT 2025-B A3 DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029

3.88 1.55
971.41 972.55 95,963.97 101.01 JPMorgan 95,000.00 44935XAD7HART 2025-B A3 DTD 06/11/2025 4.360% 12/17/2029

3.79 1.66
270.37 271.21 95,262.87 100.28 JPMorgan 95,000.00 90327HAC3USAOT 2025-A A3 DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029

3.81 1.60
1,035.85 1,036.36 231,031.55 100.45 Barclays 230,000.00 43813QAD1HAROT 2025-3 A3 DTD 08/12/2025 4.040% 02/21/2030

3.83 1.81
252.39 253.18 80,241.76 100.30 Barclays 80,000.00 02008KAC7ALLYA 2025-1 A3 DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030

3.82 1.72
1,034.33 1,036.10 166,018.71 100.62 RBC Capi 165,000.00 89238VAD0TAOT 2025-C A3 DTD 07/30/2025 4.110% 03/15/2030

3.82 1.88
278.24 281.44 200,248.80 100.12 Citigrou 200,000.00 44935JAD8HART 2025-C A3 DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030

3.85 1.90
466.31 467.63 65,458.06 100.70 TD Secur 65,000.00 362549AD9GMCAR 2025-2 A3 DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030

3.79 1.32
2,071.82 2,072.52 187,071.82 101.12 BOFAML 185,000.00 05522RDK1BACCT 2025-A1 A DTD 06/12/2025 4.310% 05/15/2030

3.83 2.14
Account 20240100 Page 23PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
122
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Fair Market Value & Analytics CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Value On Cost Amort CostCUSIP Broker Date PriceDated Date/Coupon/Maturity Par at Mkt Market Unreal G/L Unreal G/LNext Call MarketSecurity Type/Description YTMEffective Duration
Asset-Backed Security
685.35 686.99 180,652.14 100.36 BOFAML 180,000.00 43814XAD5HAROT 2025-4 A3 DTD 11/12/2025 3.980% 06/17/2030

3.84 2.05
289.30 290.64 210,266.49 100.13 JPMorgan 210,000.00 89231GAD0TAOT 2025-D A3 DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030

3.81 2.04
4,223.02 4,234.92 404,126.40 101.03 Citigrou 400,000.00 17305EHA6CCCIT 2025-A1 A DTD 06/26/2025 4.300% 06/21/2030

3.84 2.24

57.70 58.79 95,038.67 100.04 JPMorgan 95,000.00 14043YAD7COPAR 2025-1 A3 DTD 11/05/2025 3.850% 07/15/2030

3.86 2.13
2,729.14 2,732.42 227,700.00 101.20 Barclays 225,000.00 02582JKV1AMXCA 2025-4 A DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030

3.82 2.29
2,908.24 2,909.47 322,903.04 100.91 JPMorgan 320,000.00 161571HZ0CHAIT 2025-A1 A DTD 07/25/2025 4.160% 07/15/2030

3.80 2.29
170.36 174.40 250,127.00 100.05 WellsFar 250,000.00 14041NGF2COMET 2025-A1 A DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/15/2030

3.83 2.45
125.66 125.72 100,117.20 100.12 BNP Sec 100,000.00 89240KAD0TAOT 2026-A A3 DTD 01/21/2026 3.860% 09/16/2030

3.84 2.22
688.59 689.42 185,673.77 100.36 BNP Sec 185,000.00 44891XAD9HART 2025-D A3 DTD 11/12/2025 3.990% 09/16/2030

3.86 2.16

7.87 8.53 130,003.38 100.00 JPMorgan 130,000.00 16144MAD6CHAOT 2025-2A A3 DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030

3.89 2.15
37,676.94 3.84 37,528.33 5,464,278.02 5,427,280.45 Security Type Sub-Total 1.60 41,507,654.52 41,756,075.90 664,172.38 397,232.86 3.79 Managed Account Sub-Total 2.44 Total Investments $42,085,560.21
$329,484.31
$41,756,075.90
Accrued Interest
Securities Sub-Total $41,507,654.52 $664,172.38 $397,232.86 3.79% 2.44 Account 20240100 Page 24PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
123
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
BUY
01/05/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2025 3.625% 12/31/2030
91282CPR6 (333,364.26) (167.73) (333,531.99) 335,000.00 01/02/26 01/08/26 CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE
DTD 01/08/2026 4.150% 01/08/2031
14913UBH2 (39,985.60) 0.00 (39,985.60) 40,000.00 01/05/26 01/13/26 TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031
89158TAA7 (175,000.00) 0.00 (175,000.00) 175,000.00 01/06/26 01/13/26 TOTALENERGI CAP USA LLC
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/13/2026 4.248% 01/13/2031
89158TAA7 (235,554.60) 0.00 (235,554.60) 235,000.00 01/07/26 01/21/26 TAOT 2026-A A3
DTD 01/21/2026 3.860% 09/16/2030
89240KAD0 (99,991.48) 0.00 (99,991.48) 100,000.00 01/13/26 01/22/26 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/22/2026 4.026% 01/22/2030
06406RCG0 (50,000.00) 0.00 (50,000.00) 50,000.00 01/14/26 01/22/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 11/15/2018 3.125% 11/15/2028
9128285M8 (49,316.41) (293.51) (49,609.92) 50,000.00 01/21/26 01/22/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 05/15/2025 3.750% 05/15/2028
91282CND9 (561,684.38) (3,944.75) (565,629.13) 560,000.00 01/21/26 (4,405.99) (1,549,302.72)(1,544,896.73) 1,545,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total

INTEREST
01/25/26 FHMS K064 A2
DTD 05/01/2017 3.224% 03/01/2027
3137BXQY1 0.00 1,047.80 1,047.80 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K522 A2
DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
3137HDJJ0 0.00 1,461.95 1,461.95 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K515 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 5.400% 01/01/2029
3137HBPD0 0.00 1,687.50 1,687.50 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K513 A2
DTD 01/01/2024 4.724% 12/01/2028
3137HBFY5 0.00 846.38 846.38 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 0.00 1,167.36 1,167.36 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 0.00 704.21 704.21 01/01/26
Account 20240100 Page 25PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
124
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

INTEREST
01/25/26 FHMS K066 A2
DTD 08/01/2017 3.117% 06/01/2027
3137F2LJ3 0.00 896.14 896.14 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
3137HAMR4 0.00 1,286.10 1,286.10 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K509 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.850% 09/01/2028
3137HAST4 0.00 1,151.88 1,151.88 01/01/26
01/25/26 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.181% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 0.00 1,247.30 1,247.30 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K512 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
3137HBCF9 0.00 1,467.39 1,467.39 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K514 A2
DTD 02/01/2024 4.572% 12/01/2028
3137HBLV4 0.00 838.20 838.20 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K065 A2
DTD 07/01/2017 3.243% 04/01/2027
3137F1G44 0.00 594.55 594.55 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K508 A2
DTD 10/01/2023 4.740% 08/01/2028
3137HAQ74 0.00 1,501.00 1,501.00 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K511 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 4.860% 10/01/2028
3137HB3G7 0.00 850.50 850.50 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K506 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 08/01/2028
3137HAMH6 0.00 1,453.13 1,453.13 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K517 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.355% 01/01/2029
3137HC2C5 0.00 1,494.94 1,494.94 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K526 A2
DTD 08/01/2024 4.543% 07/01/2029
3137HDXL9 0.00 1,325.04 1,325.04 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K505 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.819% 06/01/2028
3137HACX2 0.00 1,445.70 1,445.70 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K524 A2
DTD 07/01/2024 4.720% 05/01/2029
3137HDV56 0.00 1,258.67 1,258.67 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K546 A2
DTD 09/01/2025 4.361% 05/01/2030
3137HN4R6 0.00 944.88 944.88 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K529 A2
DTD 10/01/2024 4.791% 09/01/2029
3137HH6C0 0.00 818.46 818.46 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
3137HAMG8 0.00 717.66 717.66 01/01/26
Account 20240100 Page 26PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
125
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

INTEREST
01/25/26 FHMS K516 A2
DTD 03/01/2024 5.477% 01/01/2029
3137HBPM0 0.00 1,711.56 1,711.56 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K507 A2
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 09/01/2028
3137HAMS2 0.00 1,480.00 1,480.00 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K510 A2
DTD 11/01/2023 5.069% 10/01/2028
3137HB3D4 0.00 612.50 612.50 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS K530 A2
DTD 11/01/2024 4.792% 09/01/2029
3137HHJL6 0.00 1,597.33 1,597.33 01/01/26
01/25/26 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
3137HAMN3 0.00 458.40 458.40 01/01/26
01/02/26 MONEY MARKET FUND
DTD 01/01/2010 0.000% --
MONEY0002 0.00 263.61 263.61 01/02/26
01/14/26 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP
DTD 07/14/2023 4.950% 07/14/2028
24422EXB0 0.00 6,806.25 6,806.25 01/14/26
01/15/26 BACCT 2025-A1 A
DTD 06/12/2025 4.310% 05/15/2030
05522RDK1 0.00 664.46 664.46 01/15/26
01/15/26 HART 2023-C A3
DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
44918CAD4 0.00 377.37 377.37 01/15/26
01/15/26 HART 2025-C A3
DTD 09/17/2025 3.880% 04/15/2030
44935JAD8 0.00 646.67 646.67 01/15/26
01/15/26 TAOT 2025-B A3
DTD 04/30/2025 4.340% 11/15/2029
89231HAD8 0.00 542.50 542.50 01/15/26
01/15/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/15/2024 4.375% 07/15/2027
91282CKZ3 0.00 3,609.38 3,609.38 01/15/26
01/15/26 USAOT 2025-A A3
DTD 10/09/2025 3.950% 12/17/2029
90327HAC3 0.00 312.71 312.71 01/15/26
01/15/26 COPAR 2025-1 A3
DTD 11/05/2025 3.850% 07/15/2030
14043YAD7 0.00 304.79 304.79 01/15/26
01/15/26 CHAIT 2024-A1 A
DTD 01/31/2024 4.600% 01/15/2029
161571HV9 0.00 1,265.00 1,265.00 01/15/26
01/15/26 BACCT 2023-A2 A2
DTD 12/14/2023 4.980% 11/15/2028
05522RDH8 0.00 560.25 560.25 01/15/26
01/15/26 HART 2025-A A3
DTD 03/12/2025 4.320% 10/15/2029
44935CAD3 0.00 882.00 882.00 01/15/26
Account 20240100 Page 27PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
126
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

INTEREST
01/15/26 TAOT 2023-D A3
DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
89239FAD4 0.00 286.07 286.07 01/15/26
01/15/26 CHAIT 2025-A1 A
DTD 07/25/2025 4.160% 07/15/2030
161571HZ0 0.00 1,109.33 1,109.33 01/15/26
01/15/26 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
31680EAD3 0.00 728.33 728.33 01/15/26
01/15/26 COMET 2025-A1 A
DTD 09/16/2025 3.820% 09/15/2030
14041NGF2 0.00 795.83 795.83 01/15/26
01/15/26 TARGET CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2022 1.950% 01/15/2027
87612EBM7 0.00 2,778.75 2,778.75 01/15/26
01/15/26 HAROT 2025-4 A3
DTD 11/12/2025 3.980% 06/17/2030
43814XAD5 0.00 597.00 597.00 01/15/26
01/15/26 TAOT 2025-D A3
DTD 10/23/2025 3.840% 06/17/2030
89231GAD0 0.00 672.00 672.00 01/15/26
01/15/26 AMXCA 2025-4 A
DTD 07/22/2025 4.300% 07/15/2030
02582JKV1 0.00 806.25 806.25 01/15/26
01/15/26 HART 2025-D A3
DTD 11/12/2025 3.990% 09/16/2030
44891XAD9 0.00 615.13 615.13 01/15/26
01/15/26 HART 2025-B A3
DTD 06/11/2025 4.360% 12/17/2029
44935XAD7 0.00 345.17 345.17 01/15/26
01/15/26 TAOT 2023-C A3
DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
89231FAD2 0.00 202.78 202.78 01/15/26
01/15/26 AMXCA 2023-3 A
DTD 09/19/2023 5.230% 09/15/2028
02582JKD1 0.00 1,351.08 1,351.08 01/15/26
01/15/26 TAOT 2025-C A3
DTD 07/30/2025 4.110% 03/15/2030
89238VAD0 0.00 565.13 565.13 01/15/26
01/15/26 ALLYA 2025-1 A3
DTD 10/16/2025 3.960% 03/15/2030
02008KAC7 0.00 264.00 264.00 01/15/26
01/15/26 CHAIT 2023-A1 A
DTD 09/15/2023 5.160% 09/15/2028
161571HT4 0.00 1,290.00 1,290.00 01/15/26
01/16/26 GMCAR 2024-1 A3
DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
36268GAD7 0.00 117.27 117.27 01/16/26
01/16/26 GMCAR 2025-2 A3
DTD 05/14/2025 4.280% 04/16/2030
362549AD9 0.00 231.83 231.83 01/16/26
Account 20240100 Page 28PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
127
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

INTEREST
01/17/26 PEPSICO INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 07/17/2024 4.500% 07/17/2029
713448FX1 0.00 4,162.50 4,162.50 01/17/26
01/17/26 COOPERAT RABOBANK UA/NY
DTD 07/20/2023 5.080% 07/17/2026
21684LGS5 0.00 9,144.00 9,144.00 01/17/26
01/18/26 HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
43815QAC1 0.00 569.57 569.57 01/18/26
01/21/26 HAROT 2025-3 A3
DTD 08/12/2025 4.040% 02/21/2030
43813QAD1 0.00 774.33 774.33 01/21/26
01/21/26 HAROT 2025-1 A3
DTD 02/11/2025 4.570% 09/21/2029
43814VAC1 0.00 1,085.37 1,085.37 01/21/26
01/24/26 BANK OF AMERICA CORP (CALLABLE)
DTD 01/24/2025 4.979% 01/24/2029
06051GMK2 0.00 7,095.08 7,095.08 01/24/26
01/25/26 CHAOT 2025-2A A3
DTD 10/29/2025 3.860% 10/25/2030
16144MAD6 0.00 418.17 418.17 01/25/26
01/26/26 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 0.00 3,382.50 3,382.50 01/26/26
01/31/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 01/31/2025 4.250% 01/31/2030
91282CMG3 0.00 15,406.25 15,406.25 01/31/26
01/31/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 07/31/2024 4.000% 07/31/2029
91282CLC3 0.00 800.00 800.00 01/31/26
01/31/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 02/01/2021 0.750% 01/31/2028
91282CBJ9 0.00 1,912.50 1,912.50 01/31/26
105,807.74 105,807.74 0.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total

PAYDOWNS
01/25/26 FHMS K522 A2
DTD 06/01/2024 4.803% 05/01/2029
3137HDJJ0 40.53 0.00 40.53 0.00 0.00 40.53 01/01/26 01/25/26 FHMS KJ47 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 5.272% 08/01/2028
3137HAMN3 422.47 0.00 422.47 0.00 0.00 422.47 01/01/26 01/25/26 FHMS KJ46 A1
DTD 07/01/2023 4.777% 06/01/2028
3137HAD45 339.74 0.00 339.74 0.01 0.01 339.73 01/01/26 01/25/26 FHMS K506 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.650% 05/01/2028
3137HAMG8 215.64 0.00 215.64 3.23 1.75 215.64 01/01/26 Account 20240100 Page 29PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
128
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method

PAYDOWNS
01/25/26 FHMS K507 A1
DTD 09/01/2023 4.800% 04/01/2028
3137HAMR4 2,158.39 0.00 2,158.39 33.87 18.51 2,158.40 01/01/26 01/25/26 FHMS K061 A2
DTD 01/01/2017 3.347% 11/01/2026
3137BTUM1 533.64 0.00 533.64 16.43 4.22 533.64 01/01/26 01/25/26 FNA 2023-M6 A2
DTD 07/01/2023 4.181% 07/01/2028
3136BQDE6 34.46 0.00 34.46 0.59 0.30 34.46 01/01/26 01/25/26 FHMS K512 A2
DTD 12/01/2023 5.000% 11/01/2028
3137HBCF9 14,886.06 0.00 14,886.06 (139.00) (85.95) 14,886.06 01/01/26 01/15/26 TAOT 2023-C A3
DTD 08/15/2023 5.160% 04/17/2028
89231FAD2 4,141.10 0.00 4,141.10 0.94 0.45 4,141.10 01/15/26 01/15/26 TAOT 2023-D A3
DTD 11/14/2023 5.540% 08/15/2028
89239FAD4 4,184.51 0.00 4,184.51 0.45 0.25 4,184.51 01/15/26 01/15/26 FITAT 2023-1 A3
DTD 08/23/2023 5.530% 08/15/2028
31680EAD3 13,159.04 0.00 13,159.04 0.82 0.42 13,159.04 01/15/26 01/15/26 HART 2023-C A3
DTD 11/13/2023 5.540% 10/16/2028
44918CAD4 5,849.24 0.00 5,849.24 0.77 0.45 5,849.24 01/15/26 01/16/26 GMCAR 2024-1 A3
DTD 01/17/2024 4.850% 12/18/2028
36268GAD7 2,192.82 0.00 2,192.82 0.44 0.27 2,192.82 01/16/26 01/18/26 HAROT 2023-3 A3
DTD 08/22/2023 5.410% 02/18/2028
43815QAC1 12,452.25 0.00 12,452.25 2.57 1.20 12,452.25 01/18/26

0.00 (58.12)(78.88) 60,609.89 60,609.89 60,609.89 Transaction Type Sub-Total SELL
01/05/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 09/30/2021 0.875% 09/30/2026
91282CCZ2 196,125.00 466.35 196,591.35 11,976.56 (1,279.88) FIFO 200,000.00 01/02/26 01/08/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2025 3.625% 12/31/2030
91282CPR6 39,848.44 32.04 39,880.48 43.75 43.39 FIFO 40,000.00 01/05/26 01/13/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/31/2025 3.625% 12/31/2030
91282CPR6 174,350.59 227.81 174,578.40 205.08 201.33 FIFO 175,000.00 01/06/26 01/13/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 12/01/2025 3.500% 11/30/2030
91282CPN5 238,012.50 1,015.38 239,027.88 (618.75) (646.49) FIFO 240,000.00 01/07/26 01/14/26 US TREASURY N/B
DTD 03/31/2021 1.250% 03/31/2028
91282CBS9 99,938.67 382.21 100,320.88 5,467.38 (309.28) FIFO 105,000.00 01/13/26 Account 20240100 Page 30PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
129
For the Month Ending January 31, 2026Managed Account Security Transactions & Interest CITY OF EASTVALE - INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 20240100
Transaction Type
Trade CUSIPSecurity DescriptionSettle Par Proceeds
Principal Accrued
Interest Total Cost
Realized G/L Realized G/L Sale
Amort Cost Method
SELL
01/20/26 BANK OF NY MELLON CORP
(CALLABLE)
DTD 01/26/2022 2.050% 01/26/2027
06406RBA4 49,157.00 495.42 49,652.42 (1,004.00) (873.45) FIFO 50,000.00 01/14/26 01/22/26 APPLE INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 05/10/2023 4.000% 05/10/2028
037833ET3 563,533.60 4,480.00 568,013.60 2,508.80 3,069.47 FIFO 560,000.00 01/21/26 01/22/26 ALPHABET INC (CALLABLE)
DTD 11/06/2025 3.875% 11/15/2028
02079KAV9 50,160.50 409.03 50,569.53 203.50 200.62 FIFO 50,000.00 01/21/26 7,508.24 405.71 18,782.32 1,418,634.54 1,411,126.30 1,420,000.00 Transaction Type Sub-Total (73,160.54) 108,909.99 35,749.45 18,703.44 347.59 Managed Account Sub-Total Total Security Transactions $18,703.44 $35,749.45 $108,909.99 ($73,160.54) $347.59 Account 20240100 Page 31PFM Asset Management, a division of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc.
130

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.5
February 25, 2026
City of Eastvale Crime Statistics – December 2025
Prepared By:

Johnny Terfehr, Community Safety Director
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council receive and ﬁle the Eastvale Crime Sta s
cs for December
2025.

Summary
The City Council requested staﬀ collaborate with the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department to develop a crime sta
s
cs document that would reﬂect selected Part I and Part II crime data for the City of Eastvale. Intended to show month-to-month crime sta s
cs, the document will assist in
determining appropriate staffing levels for law enforcement services.

Background
In May 2017, City Council directed staﬀ to coordinate with the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department to request and obtain monthly crime sta
s
cs for the City of Eastvale. The primary
intent of the request was to determine appropriate staﬃng levels during the City’s contract nego
a
ons with the Sheriﬀ’s Department. Over several weeks, the city manager and staﬀ worked collabora
vely with Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department administra on and management to
obtain crime statistics that could be shared with the public on a regular basis.

Upon receiving the data, the Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department advised staﬀ that the data provided would be reﬂec
ve of the previous month, or thirty days behind the current month; and that the report would need to include a disclaimer iden fying the data as preliminary and raw. At
the July 26, 2017 mee
ng, City Council recommended that staﬀ add columns reﬂec ve of felony and
misdemeanor arrests. During the September 26, 2017 mee
ng, City Council recommended staﬀ add 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
131
traﬃc viola
ons/cita
ons data and the total calls for service broken down per month. Crime sta
s
cs that were released in the
me that passed since the last mee
ng of the City Council are
attached.

Environmental
Crime sta
s
cs are not a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no environmental review is required.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: N/A
| Goal #: N/A
Not applicable
Fiscal Impact
Not applicable.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 25, 2017, the Public Safety Commission approved the receival of a monthly crime sta s
cs
report.

On July 26, 2017, the City Council approved the receival of a monthly crime sta s
cs report and
requested columns reflective of felony and misdemeanor arrests.

On September 26, 2017, the City Council recommended that the report include traﬃc viola ons and
citations data.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Eastvale Crime Statistics Report December 2025

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
132
PART I CRIMES OCT 2024 OCT 2025 NOV 2024 NOV 2025 DEC 2024 DEC 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Aggravated Assault 8 15 8 23 11 15 160 192
Burglary 10 8 10 10 12 7 120 92
Larceny Theft 80 69 80 41 81 51 1,000 717
Rape 1 0 1 0 1 0 14 6
Robbery 1 0 1 1 0 1 24 16
Vehicle Theft 9 14 9 8 19 12 129 85
Total Part I Crimes 109 106 109 84 124 86 1,448 1,111
PART I CRIME OCT 2024 OCT 2025 NOV 2024 NOV 2025 DEC 2024 DEC 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rape 1 0 1 0 1 0 14 6
Robbery 1 0 1 1 0 1 24 16
Aggravated Assault 8 15 8 23 11 15 160 192
Arson 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Total Violent Crimes 10 15 10 25 12 16 199 217
PROPERTY CRIMES OCT 2024 OCT 2025 NOV 2024 NOV 2025 DEC 2024 DEC 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Burglary 10 8 10 10 12 7 120 92
Vehicle Theft 9 14 9 8 19 12 129 85
Larceny Theft 80 69 80 41 81 51 1,000 717
Total Property Crimes 99 91 99 59 112 70 1,249 894
CALL NATURE OCT 2024 OCT 2025 NOV 2024 NOV 2025 DEC 2024 DEC 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Mail Theft 4 12 5 5 6 1 87 90
Total Calls 2,452 2,438 1,948 2,163 1,894 2,358 27,037 26,833 CHARGE LEVEL OCT 2024 OCT 2025 NOV 2024 NOV 2025 DEC 2024 DEC 2025 YTD-2024 YTD-2025 Felony Arrests 5 15 10 13 5 9 133 165
Misdemeanor Arrests 36 31 32 34 26 34 366 373
Total Arrests 41 46 42 47 31 43 499 538

TOTAL ARRESTS
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.

CITY OF EASTVALE
Crime Data & Statistics
90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL PART I CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL VIOLENT CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES | 90-Day / Year-Over-Year
CALLS FOR SERVICE 90-Day / Year-Over-Year

Page 1 ends

PART I CRIMES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Aggravated Assault 11 11 19 23 19 16 11 14 15 15 23 15 192 Burglary 18 2 7 8 5 5 10 8 4 8 10 7 92
Larceny Theft 45 54 63 64 70 70 63 66 61 69 41 51 717
Rape 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6
Robbery 0 4 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 16
Vehicle Theft 6 5 9 4 2 9 5 5 6 14 8 12 85
Total Crime 82 76 102 101 98 103 92 93 88 106 84 86 1,111

PART I CRIME JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Rape 2 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 6
Robbery 0 4 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 16
Aggravated Assault 11 11 19 23 19 16 11 14 15 15 23 15 192 Arson 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Total Crime 13 15 23 25 21 19 14 14 17 15 25 16 217

PROPERTY CRIMES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Burglary 18 2 7 8 5 5 10 8 4 8 10 7 92
Vehicle Theft 6 5 9 4 2 9 5 5 6 14 8 12 85
Larceny Theft 45 54 63 64 70 70 63 66 61 69 41 51 717
Total Crime 69 61 79 76 77 84 78 79 71 91 59 70 894

CALL NATURE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Mail Thefts 7 9 8 12 2 10 3 16 5 12 5 1 90
Total Calls 1,981 2,094 2,138 2,271 2,184 2,137 2,281 2,376 2,412 2,438 2,163 2,358 26,833

CHARGE LEVEL JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Felony Arrests 11 4 16 17 17 15 22 13 13 15 13 9 165
Misdemeanor 32 21 25 24 34 38 32 35 33 31 34 34 373
Total Arrests 43 25 41 41 51 53 54 48 46 46 47 43 538
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.

CITY OF EASTVALE
Crime Data & Statistics
CY-2025

TOTAL ARRESTS

TOTAL VIOLENT CRIMES

TOTAL PART I CRIMES

TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES

TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE

Page 2 ends

TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD T/C – No Injury 50 38 45 53 47 38 42 52 51 53 39 47 555 T/C – w/ Injury 10 5 10 6 8 13 6 10 13 10 12 9 112
T/C – Fatality 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hit & Run – No Injury 11 5 14 16 11 13 6 3 10 7 8 5 109 Hit & Run – w/ Injury 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
Total Collisions 72 48 69 76 66 67 54 65 74 70 59 62 782

TRAFFIC CITATIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD Parking 71 100 108 136 140 95 97 156 151 149 96 205 1,504 Traffic / Moving 120 270 144 298 273 192 259 312 247 198 268 139 2,720 Commercial 167 164 195 68 180 190 231 187 69 279 219 213 2,162 Total Citations 358 534 447 502 593 477 587 655 467 626 583 557 6,386

TRAFFIC INCIDENTS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD DUI (Arrests/Cites) 6 7 5 2 3 6 5 4 5 6 6 5 60
Street Racing (VC 23103) 23 17 22 22 20 25 22 20 21 14 18 17 241

CITY OF EASTVALE
Traffic Enforcement Statistics
CY-2025

TOTAL TRAFFIC COLLISIONS

TOTAL TRAFFIC CITATIONS

TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY
DISCLAIMER: This report's crime data figures are preliminary and pending year-end verification by CA-DOJ and the FBI. All crime data is derived from the Riverside Sheriff's Records Management System (RMS) and is current as of the date of publishing. The Crime data is dynamic and can change based on a change in crime verification or how fast reports are written and entered.

Page 3 ends

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.6
February 25, 2026
Approval of Le*ers of Support for the City of Eastvale’s FY 2026- 2027 Congressional Community Project Funding Requests
Prepared By:

Alexander Fung, Economic Development Manager
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve le
ers supporng the submi
al of three FY 2026-
2027 Congressional Community Project Funding Requests.

Summary
Formerly known as “earmarks,” Community Project Funding (CPF) requests are provisions inserted into a federal budget bill that directs funds to a speciﬁc recipient for a designated project. The United States House of Representaves is ancipated to solicit CPF requests from municipalies and eligible nonproﬁt organizaons as early as this month. Each Senator and Congressmember can submit requests to Congress to fund speciﬁc projects and iniaves that will be carried out by cies or local organizations.

Staﬀ is in the process of preparing to submit three CPF requests, including a request to support hazardous fuels reduction activities in the Santa Ana Riverbed within the City’s jurisdiction, a request to support Riverside County Sheriﬀ’s Department to fund the “Drones as First Responder” (DFR) Program in Eastvale, and a request to outfit one of Eastvale’s fire trucks.

As a result, staﬀ recommends that the City Council approve three le ers of recommendaon
supporng such submi
als to Congress. Acknowledging that the three funding requests are for the federal government’s 2026-2027 Fiscal Year, and recognizing that California’s Proposion 50’s new congressional maps will take eﬀect soon a:er the 2026 General Elecons, all of the three funding requests will be located in the 35th California Congressional District. 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
136
Background
Each year, Congress allows Senators and Congressmembers to submit funding requests for municipalies and eligible nonproﬁt organizaons to carry out speciﬁc projects or iniaves. This process is commonly known as the Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) process in the Senate and the Community Project Funding (CPF) process in the House of Representaves. The Senate Appropriaons Commi
ee is responsible for overseeing the Senate’s CDS process and the House Commi
ee on Appropriaons is responsible for overseeing the House of Representaves’ CPF Request.

Once a Senator or Congressmember submits a CDS or CPF request, the respecve Appropriaons Commi
ee will review the request and determine whether the request should be funded. If so, the Appropriaons Commi
ee will include the request in a funding bill for Congress’ review. The legislaon must be passed by both the Senate and the House of Representaves and signed by the President in order for the funding request to be formally approved.

While the CDS and CPF processes only occur once a year, it can be anywhere between 12 to 18 months for the request to be formally approved and signed into law. Nonetheless, this process provides municipalies and eligible nonproﬁt organizaons the ability to request funding to implement specific projects or initiatives that would benefit their respective communities.

Analysis
In consultaon with the City’s Execuve Team, staﬀ idenﬁed three eligible and suitable projects that can beneﬁt from Congress’ FY 2026-2027 Community Project Funding (CPF) opportunity. These three projects include the Santa Ana Riverbed Hazardous Fuels Reducon Project, the “Drones as First Responder” (DFR) Program, and the outfitting of a fire truck.

Santa Ana Riverbed Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project
The Santa Ana Riverbed at the border of Eastvale and Norco contains dry vegetaon that can serve as fuel for wildﬁres, especially during windy, hot, or dry weather condions. Reducing the fuel minimizes the risk of fast-spreading ﬁres that can threaten nearby homes, businesses, and infrastructure. The Santa Ana Riverbed area is adjacent to major roadways, ulies, and ﬂood control systems that can be damaged in the event of a wildﬁre. Protecng these assets ensures uninterrupted services and prevents costly repairs. Controlled removal of excessive brush helps with maintaining a balanced ecosystem and prevents uncontrolled wildﬁres from destroying nave habitats and nearby infrastructures. Proper vegetaon management, especially brush removal eﬀorts, can reduce the risk of erosion and improve the health of the riverbed environment. To ensure that the area will remain as a balanced ecosystem, staﬀ proposes that the brush removal eﬀorts focus on areas closer to the homes near the Baron Drive/River Road intersecon. Staﬀ plans on submitting a $950,000.00 request to support hazardous fuels reduction activities.

“Drones as First Responder” (DFR) Program
Public safety is one of the most important services provided by local government agencies. The ability to access real-me informaon during emergencies allows the City’s ﬁrst responders to gain situaonal awareness before personnel arrive on scene. This improves response mes, decision- making, and overall safety for Eastvale’s residents, businesses, and ﬁrst responders. The DFR Program is especially valuable during high-risk incidents such as acve emergencies, traﬃc 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
137
collisions, ﬁres, and natural disasters. With the ability to assess condions from above, this program can help de-escalate situaons, idenfy hazards, and ensure that limited public safety resources are deployed eﬃciently and eﬀecvely. Staﬀ plans on submiKng a $350,000.00 request to support the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department to implement this program in Eastvale.

Frontline Fire Truck Equipment
The City’s ﬁre personnel are o:en the ﬁrst on scene for structure ﬁres, medical emergencies, natural disasters, and traﬃc collisions. Ensuring that a ﬁre truck is fully and properly equipped is essenal to maintaining eﬀecve, safe, and fast emergency response for residents, businesses, and visitors. The requested funds would help ouLit a frontline ﬁre truck with crical equipment needed to respond to emergencies eﬃciently and safely. Properly equipped ﬁre trucks allow ﬁreﬁghters to begin lifesaving operaons immediately upon arrival, reduce risks to ﬁrst responders, and protect lives and property throughout the community. The City anticipates purchasing a new fire truck within the next two years. Staff plans on submitting a $433,620.80 request to support equipping this new fire truck.

Environmental
Pursuant to Secon 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, organizaonal or administrave acvies of governments that do not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment are not considered as CEQA projects.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: N/A
| Target #: C
| Goal #: I
The submission of CPF requests can lead to possible award funds from Congress. This supports Goal I of Target C in the City’s 2025 Strategic Plan, which directs staff to leverage grant opportunities.

Fiscal Impact
The submission of CPF applicaons and the approval of support le ers do not result in direct ﬁscal
impacts. Should any of the CPF applicaons be selected for an award, the City can choose to accept or reject the award offer.

Prior City Council/Commission Action
Previously, the City Council approved several le
ers of support for staﬀ’s CDS and CPF requests. On
January 24, 2024, the City Council approved a le
er supporng the submi
al of a $4 million CPF
request for the construcon of the new Eastvale Library. On February 28, 2024, the City Council approved another le
er of support for staﬀ to submit a $4 million CPF request to support the development of the Eastvale Police Staon. On March 13, 2024, the City Council also approved a le
er of support for staﬀ to submit a $8 million CDS request to support the development of the Eastvale City Hall. Addionally, the City Council approved a le er of support for staﬀ to submit a
$2.3 million CPF request to support hazardous fuels reducon acvies along the Santa Ana Riverbed on February 26, 2025.

Attachment(s)
A
achment 1 - Dra: City Council Le
er of Support for the Santa Ana Riverbed Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project

Attachment 2 - Draft City Council Letter of Support for the DFR Program

Attachment 3 - Draft City Council Letter of Support for Frontline Fire Truck Equipment

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
138

February 25, 2026

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE EASTVALE SANTA ANA RIVERBED HAZARDOUS

FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

The Eastvale City Council sincerely requests the Office of Congresswoman Norma Torres to consider supporting the City of Eastvale’s Santa Ana Riverbed Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project. The Santa Ana Riverbed at the border of Eastvale and Norco currently contains dry vegetation that can serve as fuel for wildfires, especially during windy, hot, or dry weather conditions.

Reducing the fuel minimizes the risk of fast-spreading fires that can threaten nearby homes, businesses, and infrastructure. The Santa Ana Riverbed area is adjacent to major roadways, utilities, and flood control systems that can be damaged in the event of wildfire. Protecting these assets ensures uninterrupted services in the Inland Empire region and prevents costly repairs. Controlled removal of excessive brush helps with maintaining a balanced ecosystem and prevents uncontrolled wildfires from destroying native habitats and nearby infrastructures. Proper vegetation management, especially brush removal efforts, can reduce the risk of erosion and improve the health of the riverbed environment.

We hope that the Congresswoman’s Office will provide favorable consideration to this request. Please feel free to contact our Economic Development Manager, Alexander Fung, at [email protected] if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Jocelyn Yow Clint Lorimore Christian Dinco
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember

Mike McMinn Todd Rigby
Councilmember Councilmember
139

February 25, 2026

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE EASTVALE “DRONE AS FIRST RESPONDER ”

PROGRAM

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

The Eastvale City Council sincerely requests the Office of Congresswoman Norma Torres to consider funding the City of Eastvale’s request for Community Project Funding to implement a “Drone as First Responder” (DFR) Program.

Public safety is one of the most important services provided by local government agencies . The ability to access real -time information during emergencies allows the City’s first responders to gain situational awareness before personnel arrive on scene. This improves response times , decision-making, and overall safety for Eastvale’s residents, businesses, and first responders. This program is especially valuable during high-risk incidents such as active emergencies, traffic collisions, fires, and natural disasters. With the ability to assess conditions from above, this program can help de -escalate situations, identify hazards, and ensure that limited public safety resources are deployed efficiently and effectively.

Thank you for the Congresswoman’s continued leadership and commitment to the safety and well-being of our community. We hope that the Congress woman’s Office will provide favorable consideration to this request. Please feel free to contact the City ’s Economic Development Manager, Alexander Fung, at [email protected] if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Jocelyn Yow Clint Lorimore Christian Dinco
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember

Mike McMinn Todd Rigby
Councilmember Councilmember
140

February 25, 2026

The Honorable Norma Torres
2227 Rayburn House Office Building
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR THE FRONTLINE FIRE TRUCK EQUIPMENT PROJECT

Dear Congresswoman Torres,

The Eastvale City Council sincerely requests the Office of Congresswoman Norma Torres to consider funding the City of Eastvale’s Community Project Funding request to implement and support the “Frontline Fire Truck Equipment for Emergency Response” Project. This project aims to equip a frontline fire truck that will serve the Eastvale community.

The City’s fire personnel are often the first on scene for structure fires, medical emergencies, natural disasters, and traffic collisions. Ensuring that a new fire truck is fully and properly equipped is essential to maintaining effective, safe, and fast emergency response for residents, businesses, and visitors. The requested funds would help outfit a frontline fire truck with critical equipment needed to respond to emergencies efficiently and safely. Properly equipped fire trucks allow firefighters to begin lifesaving operations immediately upon arrival, reduce risks to first responders, and protect lives and property throughout the community.

Thank you for the Congresswoman’s continued leadership and commitment to the safety and well-being of our community. We hope that the Congress woman’s Office will provide favorable consideration to this request. Please feel free to contact the City ’s Economic Development Manager, Ale xander Fung, at [email protected] if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Jocelyn Yow Clint Lorimore Christian Dinco
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember

Mike McMinn Todd Rigby
Councilmember Councilmember
141

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CONSENT CALENDAR

Agenda Item No. 11.7
February 25, 2026
First Amendment to contract with Geocon West, Inc. for the Eastvale Civic Center project
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/ City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1 .

Approve the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Geocon West, Inc. for providing geotechnical observa(on and tes(ng services for the Eastvale Civic Center project, increasing the total contract amount by $136,390 and amending the total compensation not-to-exceed amount to $268,160; and
2 .

Authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

Summary
At the June 25, 2025 mee(ng, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Geocon West, Inc. (Geocon) to provide geotechnical observa(on and tes(ng services for the Eastvale Civic Center project. The scope of services includes full-(me observa(on and tes(ng during site grading ac(vi(es, founda(on (foo(ng) inspec(ons, responses to RFIs (Request For Informa(on) and issuance of pad cer(ﬁca(on le=ers. Geocon is also responsible for observa(on and tes(ng during backﬁll of both wet and dry u(li(es, as well as oﬀsite improvements. A ﬁnal report will be prepared upon completion of the work.

Background
Geocon's services are provided on a (me-and-material basis, under the originally approved Agreement (No. A-2025-083) with a not-to-exceed amount of $131,770. At the (me the original 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
142
proposal was prepared, a detailed construc(on schedule was not yet available. As a result, the level of effort was estimated based on projects of similar size and complexity.

As construction progressed, the project schedule became more defined and field conditions evolved.

Notably, the contractor proposed the use of soldier piles to shore the Police Sta(on basement walls —work that was not an(cipated in the original scope and therefore not included in the ini(al contract amount.

Based on a reconcilia(on of charges incurred to date and a review of the contractor’s updated construc(on schedule, it has been determined that addi(onal funding is necessary to complete the remaining geotechnical services. Accordingly, staﬀ recommends amending Geocon’s contract to increase the total not-to-exceed amount by $136,390 to ensure con(nued support through project completion.

Environmental
The environment impacts associated with the development of the Civic Center site were assessed in the Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) prepared for the Leal Master Plan, and the Addendum to that PEIR prepared for the Amendment to the Leal Master Plan which was adopted by the City Council on May 11, 2022.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 1
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 1
The proposed contract contribute to the development of Downtown Eastvale, which can signiﬁcantly a=ract businesses and retailers to establish their presence in the City and create a “Destination Eastvale” with high-quality and unique businesses.

Fiscal Impact
The total fiscal impact for approval of the first amendment is $136,390.

The project is inclusive of four CIP projects, City Hall (95011), Library (95012), Police Sta(on (95014), and Civic Center Site Improvement (95023). During the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget process, budget was iden(ﬁed for the Civic Center Project and broken down by the speciﬁc components of the project (buildings and site features). Adequate budget is available within each project and subsequent account. The contract will be split to each project, 36% to City Hall, 23% to Library, 26% to Police Station, and 15% to Site Development.

FY 2025-26 Project Budget
Fund
Account
City Hall
(95011-0000)
Library
(95012-0000)
Police Station
(95014-0000)
Civic Center
Site
Improvement
(95023-0000)
Debt Service Fund
500-500-6650
20,883,540
10,110,015
22,805,000
7,000,000
Public Facilities: City Hall
DIF
292-500-6650
15,221,915

Public Facilities: Library
DIF
296-500-6650

9,889,985

Police Facilities DIF
295-500-6650

4,195,000
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
143
Total

$36,105,455
$20,000,000
$27,000,000
$7,000,000

Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 28, 2021, Council authorized staﬀ to start the RFP process for an Owner Representative/Program Manager and Bridging Architect.

On November 2021, the City Council approved a contract with Griﬃn Structures and sub- consultants, LPA (architects), Urban Arena (architects), and Circle Pointe (communica(ons) in the amount of $4,580,000 for outreach, design up to Design Development, and Construc(on Administration

On May 11, 2022, the City Council approved the Downtown Eastvale Master Plan Amendment (Leal Master Plan Amendment) project and the associated Development Agreement.

On October 12, 2022 the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract amendment with Gensler architectural services for $230,000, for a combined amount not-to-exceed $250,000, to perform planning and pre-design services for Downtown Eastvale.

On October 12, 2022, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with Griﬃn Structures to reduce the Scope of Services, retaining Griﬃn as the Owner Representa(ve/Program Manager for the Civic Center project and elimina(ng sub- consultants, and reducing the total compensa(on amount to $1,845,353 and modifying the delivery method.

On November 30, 2022, the City Council held a workshop on the Civic Center Public Infrastructure Project and set the building sizes for the Civic Center Campus.

On May 10, 2023, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the Third Amendment to the Agreement with Gensler to provide to expand the scope of work to full architectural and design services for the Civic Center project.

On April 9, 2025, the City Council adopted the list of prequaliﬁed contractors to bid on the Eastvale Civic Center project.

On June 25, 2025, the City Council awarded the construc(on contract to Clark Construc(on Group - CA, LP.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - First Amendment to Agreement with Geocon

Attachment 2 - Original Contract with Geocon

12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
144

4910-1599-9632 v1
1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH
GEOCON WEST, INC. TO PROVIDE

GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING SERVICES

FOR CIVIC CENTER PROJECT

This First Amendment to Agreement (“First Amendment”) is entered into this ____ day of _________, 20 26 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Geocon West, Inc., a California corporation (“Contractor”), as follows:

RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered in an agreement (No. A -2025-083) for geotechnical observation and testing s ervices for the Civic Center Project on June 25, 2025 (“Agreement”) with a not to exceed amount of $131,770.

B. This First Amendment to the Agreement increases the contract amount by $136,390.00 for a revised compensation amount not to exceed $268,160.00.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties do hereby enter into this First Amendment which modifies and amends the Agreement as follows:

1. AMENDMENTS
(a) Compensation and Method of Payment. Section 4 (a) of the Agreement is amended to increase the total compensation not -to-exceed amount to Two Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand One Hundred Sixty Dollars and Zero Cents ($268,160.00) unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accorda nce with Section 26 “Administration and Implementation” or Section 28 “Amendment” of the Agreement.

2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
(a) Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this First Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties.
(b) Integration. This First Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this First Amendment.
145

4910-1599-9632 v1
2 (c) Effective Date. This First Amendment shall not become effective until the date it has been formally approved and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Contractor.
(d) Applicable Law. The laws of the State o f California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this First Amendment. (e) References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this First Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this First Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY OF EASTVALE
___________________________
Mark Orme
City Manager
ATTEST:
___________________________
Marc Donohue
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
_______________________________
Erica Vega
City Attorney
146

4910-1599-9632 v1
3 GEOCON WEST, INC.

By: ____
Name: ___________________________
Its: ______________________________

NOTE: CONTRACTOR’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED, AND

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE

REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR
OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTOR’S
BUSINESS ENTITY. CORPORATIONS AND LLCS MUST SUBMIT

DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT THE INDIVIDUAL SIGNING ON ITS BEHALF HAS THE AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT.

147

4910-1599-9632 v1
4 148
A-2025-083

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES

GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING SERVICES

FOR CIVIC CETNER PROJECT
This Agreement for Services (" Agreement") is entered into as of this ZS day of 30 , 2025 by and between the City of Eastvale, a municipal corporation (" City") and Geocon West, Inc., a _ California corporation (" Contractor").

City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as " Party" and hereinafter collectively referred to as the " Parties."

RECITALS
A. City is undertaking a major construction project involving the construction of a new civic center at Eastvale City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA 91752. This project consists of a new Civic Center for the City of Eastvale, California consisting of a 2 - story Public Library, 3 -story City Hall and a 2 - story Police Station with 1 level of below grade secured parking. The northwest of the site will be occupied by a Public Park which includes an Amphitheater. The project is known as the " Eastvale Civic Center Project," and is referred to herein as the " Project." B. City requires professional assistance relating to the Project.

C. City has sought, by direct negotiation the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Contractor for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Section 2 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained here and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

SECTION 1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

Subject to the provisions of Section 20 " Termination of Agreement" of this Agreement, the Term of this Agreement is for 36 months commencing on the date first ascribed above. If the engagement of Contractor is not extended by mutual written consent of City and Contractor, then this Agreement shall be terminated at the end of the Term, provided that Contractor shall not be relieved of any of the obligations or covenants contained in this Agreement until the tasks provided for within the Scope of Services, and any Additional Services expressly agreed to, have been completed. It is further provided that the obligations or covenants contained in Sections 6, 7, 15-18, 20, 24-34 shall continue in full force and effect after termination of this Agreement due to completion, end of Term, or termination by the parties.
4923-1828-1806 v5 149
SECTION 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

Contractor agrees to perform the services set forth in Exhibit " A" " Scope of Services" ( hereinafter, the " Services") and made a part of this Agreement by this reference.

During the period of this Agreement, upon request by City, Contractor, shall provide information related to Services that is reasonably necessary to assist City in its coordination of the efforts of others performing services related to the Services or Project.

Contractor shall, at no cost to City, prepare any necessary rework occasioned by Contractor's failure to provide the services specified in Exhibit A in a satisfactory manner, due to any act or omission attributable to Contractor, or its agents, including subcontractors.

SECTION 3. ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Contractor shall not be compensated for any work rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement that are in addition to or outside of the Services unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing in accordance with Section 26 " Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement. If and when such additional work is authorized, such additional work shall be deemed to be part of the Services.

SECTION 4. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.
a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Contractor the amounts specified in Exhibit " B" " Compensation" and made a part of this Agreement by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Hundred Thirty One Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Dollars ($ 131,770), unless additional compensation is approved in writing in accordance with Section 26 " Administration and Implementation" or Section 28 " Amendment" of this Agreement.
b) Each month Contractor shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor ( by sub - category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and subcontractor contracts. Subcontractor charges shall be detailed by the following categories: labor, travel, materials, equipment and supplies. If the compensation set forth in subsection ( a) and Exhibit " B" include payment of labor on an hourly basis ( as opposed to labor and materials being paid as a lump sum), the labor category in each invoice shall include detailed descriptions of task performed and the amount of time incurred for or allocated to that task. City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Contractor to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice shall be approved and paid according to the terms set forth in subsection ( c). In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Contractor for correction and resubmission. In the event that a payment dispute arises between the parties, Contractor 2-
4923-1828-1806 v5 150
shall provide to City full and complete access to Contractor's labor cost records and other direct cost data, and copies thereof if requested by City. c) City may withhold payment of a portion of an invoice because of defective work not remedied or because of unsatisfactory work performed by Contractor. When the foregoing grounds are removed by Contractor, payment shall be made for amounts withheld because of them.
d) Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Contractor which are disputed by City, City will use its best efforts to cause Contractor to be paid within thirty ( 30) days of receipt of Contractor's correct and undisputed invoice. e) Payment to Contractor for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Contractor. f) In no event shall Contractor be entitled to compensation over and above the original fee identified in Section 4(a) where changes in the scope of services or the time for performance are necessitated by the acts of or failures to act of Contractor, or any subcontractor agent, or other person performing under it.

SECTION 5. INSPECTION AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE.

City may inspect and accept or reject any of Contractor's work under this Agreement, either during performance or when completed. City shall reject or finally accept Contractor's work within sixty ( 60) days after submitted to City. City shall reject work by a timely written explanation, otherwise Contractor's work shall be deemed to have been accepted. City's acceptance shall be conclusive as to such work except with respect to latent defects, fraud and such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Acceptance of any of Contractor's work by City shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement including, but not limited to, Section 16 " Indemnification" and Section 17 Insurance."
SECTION 6. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.

All original maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, software, systems, networks, data, reports, estimates, opinions, recommendations, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, files and other documents ( collectively " Files") prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such Files.

If and to the extent that City utilizes for any purpose not related to this Agreement any maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement, Contractor's representations in Section 9 " Standard of Performance" of this Agreement shall not extend to such use of the maps, models, designs, drawings, photographs, 3 4923-1828-1806 v5 151
studies, surveys, reports, data, notes, computer files, files or other documents.

All final work product developed by Contractor in the course of providing the Services pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by City without the permission of the Contractor. Upon completion, expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall turn over to City all such final work product if paid for by the City. This provision specifically excludes Contractors' work notes and drafts, which are owned by Contractor, not City.

SECTION 7. CONTRACTOR'S BOOKS AND RECORDS.
a) Contractor shall maintain any and all documents and records demonstrating or relating to Contractor's performance of the Services. Contractor shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, or other documents or records evidencing or relating to the Services, including expenditures and disbursements charged to City pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be sufficiently complete and detailed so as to permit an accurate evaluation of the services provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. Any and all such documents or records shall be maintained for three ( 3) years from the date of execution of this Agreement and to the extent required by laws relating to audits of public agencies and their expenditures. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the total compensation in Section 4 exceeds ten thousand dollars 10,000.00), this Agreement and the Contractor's books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three ( 3) years after final payment under the Agreement.
b) Any and all records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this section shall be made available for inspection, audit and copying, at any time during regular business hours, upon request by City or its designated representative. Copies of such documents or records shall be provided directly to the City for inspection, audit and copying when it is practical to do so; otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, such documents and records shall be made available at Contractor's address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.
c) Where City has reason to believe that any of the documents or records required to be maintained pursuant to this section may be lost or discarded due to dissolution or termination of Contractor's business, City may, by written request, require that custody of such documents or records be given to the City. Access to such documents and records shall be granted to City, as well as to its successors - in - interest and authorized representatives.

SECTION 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a) Contractor is and shall at all times remain a wholly independent contractor and not an officer, employee or agent of City. Contractor shall have no authority to bind 4 4923-1828-1806 v5 152
City in any manner, nor to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise.
b) The personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's personnel.

Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Contractor or any of Contractor's personnel are in any manner officials, officers, or employees of City. c) Neither Contractor, nor any of Contractor's personnel shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City's employees. Contractor expressly waives any claim Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, may have to any such rights. Contractor's indemnity obligations in Section 16 " Indemnification" of this Agreement include the obligation to indemnify the City from and against any liability that may arise related to claims that Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are entitled to retirement, health care or any other benefits that accrue to City employees. This provision shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement.

SECTION 9. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE.

Contractor represents that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all Services. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to the Services required of Contractor under this Agreement. In addition to the general standards of performance set forth this section, additional specific standards of performance and performance criteria may be set forth in Exhibit " A" " Scope of Services" that shall also be applicable to Contractor's work under this Agreement. Where there is a conflict between a general and a specific standard of performance or performance criteria, the specific standard or criteria shall prevail over the general.

City's review of software, systems, networks, drawings, designs, specifications, reports, opinions, recommendations and incidental consulting work or materials furnished under this Agreement will not in any way relieve Contractor of responsibility for the professional and/or technical adequacy of its work. Neither City's review, acceptance of, nor payment for, any of the services will be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement.

SECTION 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS; PERMITS AND LICENSES.

Contractor shall keep itself informed of and comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, codes, ordinances, regulations and rules in effect during the term of this Agreement. Contractor shall obtain any and all licenses, permits and 5 4923-1828-1806 v5 153
authorizations necessary to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement at Contractor's sole cost unless otherwise specified in this Agreement. Neither City, nor any elected or appointed boards, officers, officials, employees or agents of City, shall be liable, at law or in equity, as a result of any failure of Contractor to comply with this section.

SECTION 11. PREVAILING WAGE & LABOR LAWS
Contractor shall keep itself fully informed of, and at all times shall observe and comply with, all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on any work, or the materials and equipment that may be used in any work, or in any way affect the performance of any work, and of all orders and decrees of agencies having any jurisdiction or authority over work performed under this Agreement including, but not limited to, those related to equal opportunity employment and the following:
a) Prevailing Wage: To the extent that the work and services, or any portions thereof, to be provided by Contractor or its sub - contractors under this Agreement is subject to California prevailing wage laws, Contractor shall pay prevailing wages to its Employees on any agreement in excess of one - thousand dollars ($ 1,000.00). Copies of the general prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Agreement, as determined by the Director of the State of California Department of Industrial Relations, are on file at the District's Offices, and may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations website, http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRUDPreWageDetermination.htm]. Contractor shall comply with the eight ( 8) hours per day, forty ( 40) hours per week/overtime/working hours restrictions for all employees, pursuant to the California Labor Code. Contractor and all subcontractors shall keep and maintain accurate employee payroll records for work and services performed under the Agreement. The payroll records shall be certified and submitted as required by law, including Labor Code Sections 1771.4 ( if applicable) and 1776, including to the Labor Commissioner, no less frequently than monthly. Contractor shall comply fully with Labor Code Section 1777.5 in the hiring of apprentices for work relating to the Agreement. If the Agreement exceeds two - thousand dollars ($ 2,000) and is funded with federal funds, then Contractor shall pay federal Davis Bacon wages and comply with applicable federal requirements.
b) Contractor shall comply with Section 12101 through 12901 of Title 22, California Administrative Code. Contractor shall warn all persons at the work site of their exposure to chemicals known to the state to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. Contractor shall be responsible for compliance by its subcontractors with this article.
c) Contractor stipulates and agrees that pursuant to the provisions of Labor Code, Sections 1810 through 1815, eight ( 8) hours labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and no worker shall be required or permitted to work more than eight ( 8) hours in any one ( 1) calendar day and forty ( 40) hours in any one ( 1) calendar week, except as provided under Section 1815. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to relate to wage determination or in any way affect contractual provisions related to compensation. 6 4923-I828-1806 v5 154
d) Notwithstanding the Labor Code provisions set forth above, pursuant to Labor Code, Section 1815, work performed by employees of Contractor in excess of eight 8) hours per day and forty ( 40) hours during any one ( 1) week shall be permitted provided that compensation shall be made for all hours worked in excess of eight ( 8) hours per day at no less than one and one-half ( 1-1/2) times the basic rate of pay. e) Contractor shall be allowed to substitute securities for any monies withheld to ensure performance under this Agreement pursuant to Section 22300 of the California Public Contracts Code.
f) To the extent required, Contractor shall be licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 3, of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California, and all other applicable federal, state, and local requirements to do the type of work contemplated in this Agreement and shall be skilled and regularly engaged in the general class or type of work called for under the Agreement.

If any discrepancy or inconsistency should be discovered between the Agreement and any law, ordinance, regulation, order, or decree, Contractor shall immediately report the same in writing to Central San. Contractor shall require and be responsible for the compliance by subcontractors of all tiers with the above provisions of this article.

Failure of Contractor to comply with this Section 11, or any federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations which in any manner affect those engaged or employed on any work, or the materials and equipment that may be used in any work, or in any way affect the performance of any work, and of all orders and decrees of agencies having any jurisdiction or authority over work performed under this Agreement, shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement.
g) Contractor shall perform the work in full compliance with applicable local, state, and federal safety requirements including but not limited to Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements, and shall assume sole and complete responsibility during the course of completion of the Services for job site safety of Contractor's employees and subcontractor's employees and their property, applicable at all times, and not limited to normal working hours. Nothing in this Section requires Contractor to be responsible for job site safety of City's property or City's personnel or the property or personnel of any third parties over which Contractor has no authority or control.

SECTION 12. NONDISCRIMINATION.

Contractor shall not discriminate, in any way, against any person on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status in connection with or related to the performance of this Agreement.

SECTION 13. UNAUTHORIZED ALIENS.
7 4923-1828-1806 v5 155
Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1101, et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of the Services, and should the any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by City.

SECTION 14. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
a) Contractor represents that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contractor's performance of the Services. Contractor further represents that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non - related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. c) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor will perform non - related services for other governmental agencies and private Parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement. Any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a) All dealings of the parties under this Agreement, as well as information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential by Contractor, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. b) Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered " voluntary" provided Contractor gives City prompt notice of such court order or subpoena.
8 4923-1828-1806 v5 156
c) If Contractor, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney's fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor's conduct.

Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. Contractor shall not be held criminally or civilly liable under any Federal or State trade secret law for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in confidence to a Federal, State, or local government official or to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law or for the disclosure of a trade secret that is made in a complaint or other document filed in a lawsuit or other proceeding, if such filing is made under seal.

SECTION 16. INDEMNIFICATION; LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
a) Indemnification for Professional Liability. Where the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contractor's services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (" Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees) to the extent caused by, in whole or in part, any negligent act, error or omission or willful misconduct of Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor, in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.
b) Indemnification for Other than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its employees, officials and agents from and against any liability ( including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, interest, defense costs, and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, or by any individual or entity for which Contractor is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees or subcontractors of Contractor. 9 4923-1828-1806 v5 157
c) Indemnification from Subcontractors. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth in this section from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance of this Agreement naming the Indemnified Parties as additional indemnitees. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth herein is binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this section.
d) Indemnification from Design Professionals. Contractors meeting the definition of a design professional, per California Civil Code § 2782.8(c), shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City, and any and all of its officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, or liability that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor.

To the extent Civil Code section 2782.8 is applicable to Contractor's scope of services set forth herein, in no event shall the cost to defend charged to Contractor exceed Contractor's proportionate share of fault. However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the design professional shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs. e) Intellectual Property Indemnification. City does not authorize the impermissible use of any patent or the reproduction of any copyrighted material by Contractor which exceeds " fair use" in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor is solely responsible for any such infringement. Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City from any and all losses, damage, costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees suffered or incurred as a result of or in connection with any claims or actions based upon infringement or alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, or trade secret, and arising out of the use of the equipment or materials utilized to perform under this Agreement or specified by or procured by Contractor, or out of the processes or actions employed by, or on behalf of, Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement.
f) City's Negligence. The provisions of paragraphs ( a) to ( e) of this Section 16 do not apply to claims occurring as a result of City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall not release City from liability arising from negligence or willful acts or omissions of City or any and all of its officials, employees and agents. g) Insurance. Submission of insurance certificates or submission of other proof of compliance with the insurance requirements does not relieve Contractor from liability under this Section. The obligations of this Section shall apply whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.
h) Limitation of Liability.
10-
4923-1828-1806 v5 158
Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, City's obligations under this Agreement shall be limited to the payment of the compensation provided for in Section 4 of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall either party be liable, regardless of whether any claim is based on contract, tort or otherwise, for any special, consequential, indirect or incidental damages, lost profits or revenue, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, or the Services described in Exhibit A.

City shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by Contractor, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to Contractor by City. The acceptance or use of such equipment by Contractor or any of its employees shall be construed to mean that Contractor accepts full responsibility for and shall exonerate, indemnify, defend and save harmless City from and against any and all claims for any damage or injury of any type, including attorneys' fees, arising from the use, misuse or failure of such equipment, whether such damage be to Contractor, its employees, City employees or third parties, or to property belonging to any of the above.

Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any right or remedy, whether in equity or at law, which City or Contractor may have under this Agreement or any applicable law. All rights and remedies of City or Contractor, whether under this Agreement or other applicable law, shall be cumulative.

SECTION 17. INSURANCE.

Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit " C" " Insurance" and made a part of this Agreement. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by City as to form and content. These requirements are subject to amendment or waiver if so approved in writing by the City Manager. Contractor agrees to provide City with copies of required policies upon request.

SECTION 18. ASSIGNMENT.

The expertise and experience of Contractor are material considerations for this Agreement. City has an interest in the qualifications and capability of the persons and entities who will fulfill the duties and obligations imposed upon Contractor under this Agreement. In recognition of that interest, Contractor shall not assign or transfer this Agreement or any portion of this Agreement or the performance of any of Contractor's duties or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the City.

Any attempted assignment shall be ineffective, null and void, and shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to any and all remedies at law or in equity, including termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 20 " Termination of Agreement." City acknowledges, however, that Contractor, in the performance of its duties pursuant to this Agreement, may utilize subcontractors. 11-
4923-1828-1806 v5 159
SECTION 19. SUBCONTRACTORS; DESIGNATION AND CONTINUITY OF PERSONNEL.
a) No subcontract shall be awarded or an outside consultant engaged by Contractor unless prior written approval is obtained from City. No additional approval shall be required for subcontracting with or engagement of any outside consultant set forth in an exhibit to this Agreement ( Exhibit A), subject to subd. ( b) below. b) If any subcontract is awarded or an outside consultant is engaged by Contractor to perform work and/or provide services that are subject to California prevailing wage laws, where such prevailing wage work was not initially anticipated, Contractor shall notify City in writing of the subcontract and/or outside consultant, the scope of work said subcontractor or outside consultant will perform, and any other information City deems reasonably necessary to complete and file the required Form PWC-100 or any other documents.
c) Contractor shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Contractor's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services. Contractor shall notify City of any changes in Contractor's staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the Services prior to and during any such performance. Contractor designates to have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement. Contractor designates the following persons for the indicated functions:

Substitution of any of these assigned personnel shall require the prior written approval of City. If City determines that a proposed substitution is not acceptable, then, at the request of City, Contractor shall substitute with a person acceptable to City.

SECTION 20. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
a) City may terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, at any time by giving thirty ( 30) days written notice of termination to Contractor. In the event such notice is given, Contractor shall cease immediately all work in progress. b) Contractor may terminate this Agreement for cause at any time upon thirty 30) days written notice of termination to City.
c) If either Contractor or City fail to perform any material obligation under this Agreement, then, in addition to any other remedies, either Contractor, or City may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice. d) Upon termination of this Agreement by either Contractor or City, all property belonging exclusively to City which is in Contractor's possession shall be returned to City. 12-
4923-1828-1806 v5 160
Contractor shall furnish to City a final invoice for work performed and expenses incurred by Contractor, prepared as set forth in Section 4 " Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement. This final invoice shall be reviewed and paid in the same manner as set forth in Section 4 " Compensation and Method of Payment" of this Agreement.

SECTION 21. DEFAULT.

In the event that Contractor is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, the City may give notice to Contractor of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Contractor may cure the default, or if the City elects, it may immediately terminate the Agreement pursuant to Section 20(c). The opportunity to cure timeframe, should the City elect to provide one, is presumptively thirty ( 30) days, but may be reduced or extended if circumstances warrant. During the period of time that Contractor is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Contractor does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this Agreement under Section 20 " Termination of Agreement." Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Contractor's default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City's legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. EXCUSABLE DELAYS.

Contractor shall not be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, if any, caused by delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of the public enemy, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather. The term and price of this Agreement shall be equitably adjusted for any delays due to such causes.

SECTION 23. COOPERATION.
a) Cooperation by City. City, without cost to Contractor, will provide all pertinent information reasonably available to it which is necessary for performance by Contractor under this Agreement, including pertinent plans, reports and data. City does not guarantee or ensure the accuracy of any reports, information, and/or data so provided.

To the extent that any reports, information, and/or other data so provided was supplied to City by person or persons not employees of City, any liability resulting from inaccuracies and/or omissions contained in said reports, information or data shall be limited to liability on behalf of the party who prepared the information for City or otherwise supplied that information, report or data to City.
b) Cooperation by Contractor. There may be other contractors, consultants, agents or forces of City working in the same area where work under the Agreement will be performed. Contractor must anticipate that is work may be interfered with or suspended from time to time on account of the concurrent performance of work by other 13-
4923-1828-1806 v5 161
contractors, consultants, agents or forces of City, and Contractor shall fully cooperate with such other parties to avoid any delay or hindrance of their work. City may require that certain facilities be used concurrently by Contractor and other persons.

Should Contractor sustain any loss, damage, or delay through any act or omission of any other contractor or any sub - consultant of any such other contractor, Contractor shall have no claim against City therefore, other than an extension of time, but shall have recourse solely to such other contractor or sub - consultant.

SECTION 24. NOTICES.

All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City:

To Contractor:

City of Eastvale
Attn: Public Works Director
12363 Limonite Ave., Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
Geocon West, Inc.

Attn: Lisa Battiato
41571 Corning Place, Ste. 101
Murrieta, CA 92562
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or, if mailed, three ( 3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.

SECTION 25. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE.

Each of the signatories hereto represents and warrants that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the other Parties hereto against all claims, suits, actions, and demands, including necessary expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising out of claims that its signatory was not competent or so authorized to execute this Agreement.

SECTION 26. ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION.

This Agreement shall be administered and executed by the City Manager or his or her designated representative. The City Manager shall have the authority to issue interpretations and to make amendments to this Agreement, including amendments that commit additional funds, consistent with Section 28 " Amendment" and the City Manager's contracting authority under the Eastvale Municipal Code. 14-
4923-1828-1806 v5 162
SECTION 27. BINDING EFFECT.

This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

SECTION 28. AMENDMENT.

No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Contractor and by the City. The City Manager shall have the authority to approve any amendment to this Agreement if it does not exceed the amount that may be approved administratively pursuant to the Eastvale Municipal Code. The Parties agree that the requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. The City's City Manager may, but is not required to, make minor amendments not affecting substantive terms without further authorization from the City Council. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any such amendments as required by this Agreement or that do not otherwise reduce City's rights under this Agreement. All other amendments shall be approved by the City Council.

SECTION 29. WAIVER.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work by Contractor shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

SECTION 30. LAW TO GOVERN; VENUE.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation between the Parties, venue in state trial courts shall lie exclusively in the County of Riverside, California. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in Riverside.

SECTION 31. ATTORNEYS FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES.

In the event litigation or other proceeding is required to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such litigation or other proceeding shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney's fees, costs and expenses, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

SECTION 32. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits " A" through " C", is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the matters addressed therein and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, or entered into between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this 15-
4923-1828-1806 v5 163
Agreement. No statements, representations or other agreements, whether oral or written, made by any Party which are not embodied herein shall be valid and binding.

SECTION 33. SEVERABILITY.

If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and the Agreement shall be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision(s).

SECTION 34. NO THIRD - PARTY BENEFICIARIES.

There are no intended third - party beneficiaries to this Agreement. Nothing in the Agreement or the attachments and/or exhibits incorporated herein shall operate to confer rights or benefits on persons or entities not party to the Agreement.

SECTION 35. CONFLICTING TERMS.

Except as otherwise stated herein, if the terms of this Agreement conflict with the terms of any Exhibit hereto, or with the terms of any document incorporated by reference into this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first - above written.

SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
16-
4923-1828-1806 v5 164

CITY OF EASTVALE
Mark Orme
City Manager
ATTEST:

Ma Donohue
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM
cam- 1/a
Erica Vega
City Attorney
GEOCON WEST, INC.

Nea
President
17-
4923-1828-I8Q6 v5
165
EXHIBIT " A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Attend a pre - construction meeting.

Provide observation and testing during site grading activities on a lull - time basis. This will include observation of the over - excavation bottoms by a professional engineer or geologist. and observation and testing of engineeredfill placement by an experiencedtechnician.

Prepare a report of observation and testing during grading for pad certifications.

Provide observation of foundation excavations prior to concrete placement for structures.

Provide observation and testing during backftll of wet and dry utilities. Wet utilities are typically required to have full time observation and testing per governing agencies while part time observation and testing during backtill of shallow dry utilities is acceptable.

Provide testing of subgrade for cross gutters, curb & gutter, pavers, and sidewalks on a part- time basis.

Provide observation and testing of subgrade. aggregate base. and asphaltic concrete pavement.

We have estimated that our observation and testing services will be required on a part-time basis for subgradeand base placement. and on a full-time basis during asphalt concrete paving.

Provide observation. testing. and inspection for offsite improvements.

Perform laboratory testing of soil and asphaltsamples. We anticipate the testing will consist of maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, expansion index. sulfate screening. and I lveem density of the asphaltconcrete.

Prepare a final report documenting the results of our observation and testing services during grading and construction of site improvements.

Provide professional project support. which includes project management. attendance at meetings when requested. preparation of compaction letters as required by agencies. response to RFI's. and QA/QC support.

ASSUMPTIONS:
o Work will be performed during typical working hours of 7 am to 5 pm Monday through Friday. Weekend and night work are not expected. 4923-1828-1806 v5 A-1
166
EXHIBIT " B"

COMPENSATION
Cost Estimate Table
Activity Description Personnel Rate Qty Estimate
Geotechnical Observation & Testing Services
Geotechnical Observation & Testing Services
esung and Observation of
Rough Grading - est 3 weeks
Wet & Dry Utility Trench Backlit' Concurent est 6weeks
Offsite Work - eft 3 weeks pan time
Flatwork & Paving Subgrade • est 4 weeks part time
Paving est 1 week
Vehicle & Equipment
Professional Observations during Earthwork • est 4 hrs/wk for 20 weeks
Footing Inspections
Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
Engineenng Technician
Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
Engineering Technician
Project Engineer/Geologist
Project Engineer/Geologist
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture • 4.'0)1557 Soils) Laboratory Expansion Potential at Finish Grade Laboratory
Sulfate Content at Finish Grade Laboratory
Hveem Density - Asphalt i D2726/CAL 308) laboratory
Miscellaneous Lab Testing & Reporting Laboratory
Sample Pick Up & Delivery Technician/Lab Tech
Professional Project Support
Project Management. QA/QC, Meetings, Etc .

Project Coordination/Scheduling, QA QC
Final Report of T&O during Grading and Improvements
135 135 $ 18,225
S135 270 536,450
5135 68 59,180
135 90 512,150

51.35 45 $ 6,075
520 563 511,260
155 80 $ 12,400
5125 24 5000
Subtotal: $ 108,740
5300 6 51,800
250 3 5750
5125 3 $ 375
225 1 545u
2,000 1 52,000
595 9 855
Subtotal: $ 6,230
CEG/GE $ 155 60 59,300
Engineering Assistant/Tech Supervisor 5125 40 55,000
CEG/GE 52,500 1 52,500
Subtotal: $ 16,800
ESTIMATE: $ 131,770
4923-1828-1806 v5
C-1
167
W E S T, I N C.

GEOTECH NICAL E N V I R O N M E N T A L M A T E R I A L S iiie.,,,Nr„)
2024 SCHEDULE OF FEES — RV24
Rates will increase by 3% on January 1Stof each year.

Professional Services
Word Processor/Non-Technical Assistant/Draftsman/Dispatcher $ 95/hr Engineering Assistant/Lab Technician $ 95/hr
Engineering Field Technician ( Earthwork/Compaction Testing/Backfill) *$ 85/hr Special Inspector ( Concrete, Rebar, Masonry, Welding, etc.) *$ 90/hr Engineering Inspector ( Bottom Approval / Shoring / Foundations / Piles) *$ 110/hr LA City Deputy Grading Inspector ( Bottom Approval / Shoring / Foundations / Piles) *$ 125/hr Staff Engineer/Geologist *$ 125/hr
Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist *$ 135/hr
Project Engineer/Geologist *$ 145/hr
Senior Project Engineer/Geologist *$ 155/hr
Senior Engineer/Geologist *$ 175/hr
Associate Engineer/Geologist *$ 200/hr
Principal Engineer/Geologist/Litigation Support $ 400/hr Attorney Fees ( General) $ 500/hr
Deposition or Court Appearance $ 550/hr
Overtime/Saturday Rate/Night Rate ( 7pm — 6am w/ 8 - Hour minimum per call out) 1.5 X Regular Hourly Rate Sunday and Holiday Rate 2 X Regular Hourly Rate
Minimum Field Services Fee per call - out, 4 Hours ( if 4 hours or less), 8 Hours ( if more than 4 hours and less than 8 Hours) Short - Notice Cancellation, 4 Hours ( if after 4 pm of the day prior to the scheduled inspection time) Short - Notice Cancellation, 4 Hours ( upon or after arrival at jobsite) Prevailing Wage ( PW) California Labor Code § 1720, et. Seq add $ 50/hr Travel
Personnel Regular Hourly Rate
Subsistence ( Per Diem) Quote Based on Location
Vehicle Mileage 0.75/mile
Equipment, Materials
Nuclear Density Gauge/Sand Cone Testing Equipment *$ 10/hr Dynamic Cone Penetrometer $ 250/day Vehicle *$ 10/hr Generator or Air Compressor $ 100/day
Special Inspection Equipment *$ 5/hr Hand - Auger $ 40/day Pick-up Truck $ 175/day Lath Bundle $ 100/ea
55 - Gallon Drum .$ 75/ea Manometer $ 100/day
AC Cold Patch $ 35/bag Mobile Laboratory with Lab Technician $ 1,650/day Gravel $ 35/bag Perforated 3" PVC Pipe $ 45/10ft
Quick Set PCC Patch $ 35/bag Sand Cone Testing Equipment $ 10/hr Sand $ 35/bag Schmidt Hammer $ 100/day
GPS Unit $ 175/day Soil Sample Tube $ 15/ea
Battery - Powered Pump $ 100/day Temp Marking Paint $ 20/can Coring Machine ( concrete, asphalt, masonry) $ 285/day Water Buffalo $ 75/ea Double Ring Infiltrometer $ 200/day Water Level Indicator $ 50/day Drive - Tube Sampler $ 60/day
41571 Corning Place, Suite 101 Murrieta, California 92562 • Telephone 951.304.2300 • www.geoconinc.com 168
Laboratory Tests*

COMPACTION CURVES
D698/D1557/T99/T108) 4 -inch mold $ 300/ea
D698/D1557/T99/T108) 6 - inch mold $ 300/ea
CT 216) California Impact $ 300/ea
Check Point $ 125/ea
01632/CT312) Soil Cement Cyl. Fabrication ( Set of 3) $ 200/set D1632/CT312) Soil Cement Cyl. Fabrication ( Addtl. Spec.) $ 75/ea D1633/CT312) Soil Cement Comp. Strength ( Set of 3) $ 350/set D1633/CT312) Soil Cement Comp. Strength ( Addtl. Spec.) $ 125/ea

SOIL AND AGGREGATE STABILITY
D2844/CT3O1) Resistance Value $ 350/ea
D2844/CT3O1) Resistance Value, Treated $ 350/ea
D1883) California Bearing Ratio $ 600/ea
C977) Stabilization Ability of Lime 185/ea
D1883) Calif. Bearing Ratio ( Army Corp of Engineers) 600/ea

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
6187/CT643/T288) pH and Resistivity $ 175/ea
D4972/T289) pH Only $ 75/ea
CT417) Sulfate Content $ 125/ea
CT422) Chloride Content $ 125/ea
D2974) Organic Content $ 100/ea

PERMEABILITY, CONSOLIDATION AND EXPANSION
D5084) Permeability, Flexible Wall $ 270/ea
D5856) Permeability, Rigid Wall $ 260/ea
D2434) Permeability, Constant Head .. $ 280/ea
D2434) Permeability, FHA Slab - on - Grade $ 110/ea
D2434) Permeability, Hourly $ 55/ea
D2435/T216) Consolidation ( 6 pts. w/ Unload) $ 400/ea
02435/T216) Consolidation Additional Point w/ Unload $ 90/ea D4546) Swell/Compression Testing & Density $ 125/ea
D4546) Swell/Settlement Testing & Density ( ea. addtl. pt) , $ 85/ea D4546) Swell/Settlement Testing & Density ( County) $ 100/ea D4546) Swell/Settlement Testing & Density ( FHA) $ 90/ea D4829) Expansion Index of Soils $ 250/ea

STEEL TESTING
Reinforcing Steel Tests:

A370) Tensile Strength & Elongation
11 Bar & Smaller $ 100/ea
14 Bar $ 125/ea
18 Bar ( Proof Test) $ 150/ea
A370) Bend Test
11 Bar & Smaller $ 50/ea
14 & # 18 Bar $ 75/ea
A370) Tensile - Mechanically Spliced Bar
11 Bar & Smaller .$ 175/ea
14 Bar & Larger .$ 225/ea
A370) Tensile — Electric Resist. Butt Splice w/ Control $ 175/ea A370) Straightening of bar ( if required) $ 50/ea
Structural Steel Tests:

A370) Machining & Prep of Test Specimen Cost + 20%
A370) Tensile Strength & Elongation
Up to 200,000 Ibs $ 125/ea
200,000 - 300,000 lbs $ 150/ea
300,000 - 400,000 lbs $ 175/ea
Pre - stressing Wire & Tendon Tests:

A421) Tensile Strength, Single Wire $ 175/ea
A416) Tensile Strength, 7 -Wire Strand $ 200/ea

SOIL AND AGGREGATE PROPERTIES
0422/T88) Particle Size, Hydrometer w/out Sieve $ 250/ea C136/06913/T27) Sieve, Coarse to Fine w/ # 200 Wash ... $ 175/ea C136/D6913/T27) Sieve, Coarse or Fine w/ # 200 Wash $ 150/ea C136/D6913/T27) Sieve, Coarse or Fine No # 200 Wash $ 125/ea C117/D1140/T11) Materials Finer than # 200 $ 115/ea
02216/T265/CT226) Moisture Content $ 40/ea
02487/D2488) Visual Soil Classification $ 40/ea
D2937) Density of In - Place Soil, Drive-Cyl. Method $ 5d/ea D4943) Shrinkage Factors of Soils, Wax Method $ 75/ea
C131/C535/CT211) L.A. Abrasion Resistance 250/ea
C142/T112) Clay Lumps and Friable Particles 155/ea
SOIL AND AGGREGATE PROPERTIES ( CONTD.)
C123/T113) Light Weight Particles $ 250/ea
D3744/CT229/T210) Durability Index Fine $ 200/ea
D3744/CT229/T210) Durability Index Coarse $ 200/ea
CT227) Cleanness Value $ 200/ea
D4791) Flat & Elongated Particles $ 175/ea
D693/CT205) Percent Crushed Particles $ 200/ea
D5821) Percent. of Fractured Particles, Coarse Aggregate $ 200/ea C4O/CT213/T21) Organic Impurities $ 100/ea
C235)Soft Hardness ( Scratch Hardness) $ 125/ea
C88/CT214/T104) Sulfate Soundness $ 500/ea
C1252/T304) Uncompact. Void Content, Fine Aggregate $ 175/ea C127/CT206/T85) Coarse Specific Gravity $ 150/ea
C128/CT207/T84) Fine Specific Gravity $ 175/ea
D854/CT209/T100) Specific Gravity of Soil $ 200/ea
C29/CT212/T19) Unit Weight & Percent Voids $ 125/ea
02419/CT217/T176) Sand Equivalent $ 150/ea
04318/CT204/T89/T90) Plastic Index ( Plastic/Liq. Limit) $ 250/ea 04318/CT204/T89) Liquid Limit $ 125/ea
D4318/CT204/T90) Plastic Limit $ 125/ea
C330) Spec. for Lightweight Aggregates, Struc. Concrete .......... Quote

SHEAR STRENGTH
D2166) Unconfined Compression $ 100/ea
03080/T236) Direct Shear ( 3 points) $ 350/set
D3080/T236) Direct Shear Addtl. Points/ea. residual pass $ 125/ea D2850) Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear $ 115/ea D2850) Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged $ 160/ea D4767) Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Shear $ 265/ea
D4767) Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Staged $ 340/ea
EM1110) Consolidated - Drained Triaxial Shear $ 375/ea
EM1110) Consolidated - Drained Triaxial Staged $ 480/ea MASONRY**
Concrete Block Test ( Sets of 3 Required):

C140) Unit Weight Moisture Content & Absorption $ 350/ea C140) Moisture Content/Absorption ( ea, addtl. specimen) $ 125/ea C140) Compression Test $ 300/ea
C140) Compression Test ( ea. addtl. specimen) $ 125/ea
C426) Linear Drying Shrinkage $ 350/ea
C109/UBC 21-16) Mortar Cylinder (2"x4") $ 30/ea
C942) Grout Prism ( 3"x3"x6"), trimming included $ 35/ea Masonry Prism ( Assemblage):

C1314) 8"x8"x16" — 8"x12"x16" $ 200/ea
C1314) 8"x16"x16" — 10"x12"x16" $ 225/ea
C1314) 12"x12"x16" — 12"x16"x16" $ 250/ea
C1314) Larger than 12"x16"x16" Quote
2 -
169
Laboratory Tests* ( continued)
High Strength Bolt, Nut, & Washer Tests:

A325/A490) Tensile Test on Bolts
A563) Proof Load Test on Nuts
A325/A490) Hardness Test on Bolts
A536) Hardness Test on Nuts
F436) Hardness Test on Washers $ 50/ea
Weld Specimen Tests:

E164) Ultrasonic Examination Quote
Machining & Prep of Test Specimen Cost + 20%
E381) Macrotech Test ( 3 Faces) $ 355

ASPHALT TESTING
Asphalt Properties:

D2726/CT308/T166) Bulk Spec. Gray. Compacted HMA $ 100/ea D1560/CT366) Stabilometer Value ( HVEEM) $ 225/ea
D2041) Theoretical Max Specific Gravity $ 200/ea
D5444) Sieve Analysis of Extracted Asphalt $ 250/ea
D6307/CT382) Percent Asphalt, Ignition Method $ 175/ea
D1188) Unit Weight of Asphalt Core $ 95/ea

MISCELLANEOUS TESTING SERVICES
Calibration of Hydraulic Ram:
100 Ton & Under $ 250/ea
101 Tons — 200 Tons $ 350/ea
Use of Universal Testing Machine:

UTM with One Operator $ 400/ea
Additional Technician Regular Tech Rate
Spray Applied Fireproofing:

E605/E736) Fireproofing Oven Dry Density/Thickness $ 125/ea Brick Test ( Set of 5 Specimens):
100/ea ( C67) 24 - Hour Absorption, Cold Water $ 250/set 100/ea ( C67) 5 - Hour Absorption, Boiling Water $ 250/set 50/ea ( C67) Compression Test or Modulus of Rupture $ 300/set 50/ea ( C67) Each Additional Specimen $ 100/ea
CONCRETE**
Mix Designs:

ACI211/ACI214) Concrete Mix Design $ 450/ea
ACI211/ACI214) Review of Concrete Mix Design $ 450/ea
C192) Concrete Trial Mix ( includes equipment & labor) $ 650/ea Concrete Properties:

C39/CT521/T22) Comp. Strength, Concrete Cyl $ 30/ea
C42/CT521/T22) Comp. Strength, Concrete/Gunite Core $ 60/ea C78/CT523) Flex. Strength of 6"x6"x21" Concrete Beam $ 125/ea C174) Length Measuring of Drilled Cores $ 100/ea
C1140) Shotcrete Panel - Coring & Testing (Set of 3) $ 350/set C1140) Shotcrete Panel ( each addtl. specimen) $ 125/ea C496) Static Modulus of Elasticity $ 250/ea
C496) Drying Shrinkage (Set of 3, up to 28 days) $ 650/set 0642) Spec. Gravity, Absorp., Voids in Hardened Concrete $ 95/ea F1869) Vapor Emission Rate, Concrete Subfloor $ 50/ea
2X Surcharge an rush turn - around for laboratory testing.

Fee applies for sample storage, testing, or disposal.

1. Listed are typical charges for the services most frequently performed by Geocon. Prices for unlisted services as well as special quotations for programs involving volume work will be provided upon request. Laboratory test prices shown are for laboratory work only, and include reporting of routine results not calling for comments, recommendations or conclusions.

2. Sampling and testing is conducted in substantial conformance with the latest applicable or designated specifications of the American Society for Testing and Materials, Coltrans, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or other pertinent agencies.

3. Saturday, night work, and overtime hours are charged at time and one-half; Sundays and holidays at double time. Per diem is 155.00 per day when location of work dictates.

4. Equipment and materials will be billed at cost plus 15%. Outside services including subcontractors and rental of special equipment are billed at cost plus 15%. Hourly services are billed portal to portal from closest office in accordance with the stated hourly rates herein, with a minimum two-hour charge.

5. Invoices will be submitted at four - week intervals. Terms of payment are met upon presentation of invoice. invoices become delinquent thirty ( 30) days from invoice date and subject to one and one-half percent ( 1-1/2%) service charge per month, or the maximum rate allowed by law, whichever is lower. ff Client objects to all or any portion of any invoice, Client will so notify Geocon in writing within fourteen ( 14) calendar days of the invoice date, identify the cause of disagreement, and pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion of the invoice. Payment on delinquent invoices will first be applied to accrued interest and then to the principal amount. All time spent and expenses incurred ( including any attorney's fees and costs) in connection with collection of any delinquent amount will be paid by Client to Geocon per Geocon's current fee schedule.

6. Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Geocon's ( the term " Geocon" includes Geocon's partners, officers, directors, employees, agents, affiliates, subcontractors and subconsuitants) total aggregate liability to Client is limited to the greater of $ 150,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all of Client's injuries, damages, claims, losses, expenses, or claim expenses arising out of this Agreement from any cause or causes, including attorneys' fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above.

7. Client and Geocon shall allocate certain of the other risks so that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall limit Geocon's total aggregate liability to all third parties, including contractors, subcontractors of all tiers, materialmen, and others involved in Client's project, as well as persons and other entities not involved in the project, to the greater of $ 300,000 or the total compensation received from Client by Geocon for services rendered on this project, for any and all injuries, damages, cause or causes, including attorneys' fees and costs which may be awarded to the prevailing party, and Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Geocon from and against all liabilities in excess of the monetary limit established above, including all liability incurred by Geocon for acts, errors, or omissions, pursuant to entering into agreements with third parties on behalf of Client in order to obtain access or entry onto property not owned by Client. Client agrees to notify all contractors and subcontractors of any limitation of Geocon's liability to them, and require them to abide by such limitation for damages suffered by any contractor or subcontractor arising from Geocon's actions or inactions. Neither the contractor nor any subcontractor assumes any liability for damages to others which may arise on account of Geocon's actions or inactions. 3 -
170
EXHIBIT " C"

INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements. Contractor shall provide and maintain insurance, acceptable to the City, in full force and effect throughout the term of this Agreement, against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services by Contractor, its agents, representatives or employees. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.

Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

Contractor shall provide the following scope and limits of insurance:

1. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1) Commercial General Liability. Insurance Services Office form Commercial General Liability coverage ( Occurrence Form CG 0001). 2) Automobile. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, including code 1 " any auto" and endorsement CA 0025, or equivalent forms subject to the written approval of the City. 3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of State of California covering all persons providing Services on behalf of the Contractor and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. 4) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to the Contractor's profession. This coverage may be written on a " claims made" basis. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of or related to Services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least three 3) consecutive years following the completion of Contractor's services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional three ( 3) year period, Contractor shall annually and upon request of the City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage.

2. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits of insurance no less than:
1) Commercial General Liability. $ 1,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 2) Automobile. $ 1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. A combined single limit policy with aggregate limits in an amount of not less than $ 2,000,000 shall be considered equivalent to the said required minimum limits set forth above.
4923-1828-1806 v5
C-1
171
3) Workers' Compensation. Workers' Compensation as required by the Labor Code of the State of California of not less than $ 1,000,000 per occurrence. 4) Professional Liability. $ 1,000,000 per claim.

B. Other Provisions. Insurance policies required by this Agreement shall contain the following provisions:

1. All Policies. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed and state the coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by the insurer or either Party to this Agreement, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City.

2. Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages. 1) City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, and employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities Contractor performs; products and completed operations of Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, and their respective elected and appointed officers, officials, or employees. 2) Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City, and its respective elected and appointed, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers, shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Contractor's insurance. 3) Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
4) Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the insurance policies, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

3. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Unless the City Manager otherwise agrees in writing, the insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents for losses arising from work performed by Contractor. 4923-1828-1806 v5
C-2
172
C. Other Requirements. Contractor agrees to deposit with City, at or before the effective date of this Agreement, certificates of insurance necessary to satisfy City that the insurance provisions of this contract have been complied with. The City may require that Contractor furnish City with copies of original endorsements effecting coverage required by this Exhibit " C". The certificates and endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

1. Contractor shall furnish certificates and endorsements from each subcontractor pursuant to the terms included in this Exhibit " C" to the extent applicable to the subcontractor's scope of work and trade.

2. Any deductibles or self - insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self - insured retentions as respects City or its respective elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers, or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, defense expenses and claims.

3. The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Contractor's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Agreement.
4923-1828-1806 v5
C-3
173
ACC7REP0 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
D,y
6/26/2DATE (

MM/DDIYYYT)
025
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

PRODUCER
Cavignac
451 A Street, Suite 1800
San Diego CA 92101

CONTACT
NAME: Certificate Department

PHONE FAX
INC. No. Ext): 619-744-0574 ( A/c, No): 619-234-8601
ADDRESS: [email protected]
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURER A: National Fire Insurance CO. of Hartford 20478 INSURED GEOCINC-01
Geocon6960
West,
IncDrive6960 Flanders Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
INSURER B : Amer Cas. Co of Reading, PA 20427
c : Redwood Fire & Casualty Ins Co 11673
INSURER D: Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd 10046
INSURER E :

INSURER F :

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 580924116 REVISION NUMBER:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSR

LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE
ADDL
INSD
SUER

WVD POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF

IMM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP

MM/DD/YYVY) LIMITS
A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Y 6079910091 111/2025 11112026 EACH OCCURRENCE 1,000.000

DAMAGE TO ENTED
PREMISES ( Eaoccurrence) 1,000,000CLAIMS - MADE X OCCUR MED EXP ( Any one person) 15,000X Cross Llab. Inc.

PERSONAL & ADV INJURY 1,000,000X Separation of in
GENERAL AGGREGATE 2,000,000GEN'L
X

AGGREGATE
POLICY
OTHER:

LIMIT APPLIES
Ira X
PER:

LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG 2,000,000
Deductible 0

B AUTOMOBILE
X
X

LIABIUTY

ANY AUTO

ALL OWNED
AUTOS

HIRED AUTOS X

SCHEDULED
AUTOS

NO OWNED
AUTOS
8079910086 1/1/2025 1/1/2026 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
Ea accident) 1.000.000
BODILY INJURY ( Per person)
BODILY INJURY ( Per accident)

PROPERTY DAMAGE
Per accident)

UMBRELLA UAB

EXCESS LIAR
OCCUR

CLAIMS - MADE

EACH OCCURRENCE

AGGREGATE
DE0 RETENT ON $

C WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
Mandatory In NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
N / A
Y GEWC529796 1/1/2025 1/12026 X STATUTE 0TH
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE 1,000,000
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 1,000,000
D Professional Liability 13OH056188125 1/1/2025 1/1/2026 Each Claim/ Aggregate $ 2M/$5M DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS / VEHICLES ( ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space Is required) Re: Geocon Project # T3026 - 22-01A I New Civic Center at Eastvale City Hall, 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910, Eastvale, CA. Additional Insured coverage applies to General Liability and Automobile Liability for the City of Eastvale and its respective elected and appointed officers, officials, employees, and volunteers per policy form. Primary coverage applies to General Liability and Automobile Liability per policy form. Waiver of subrogation applies to Workers Compensation per policy form. Professional Liability - Claims made form, defense costs included within limit. If the insurance company elects to cancel or non - renew coverage for any reason other than nonpayment of premium they will provide 30 days notice of such cancellation or nonrenewal. Auto Physical Damage: $ 1,000 Comprehensive & Collision Deductibles. Professional Liability Coverage Deductible $ 150,000 per claim.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 ( 2014/01)
1988-2014 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
174

AGENDA STAFF REPORT

City Council Meeting

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

Agenda Item No. 13.1
February 25, 2026
Amend Chapter 10.02 of Title 10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code Establishing the Speed Limits on Certain Streets
Prepared By:

Jimmy Chung, Public Works Director/City Engineer
Recommended Action(s)
Staﬀ recommends that the City Council introduce the proposed ordinance entled: AN ORDINANCE

OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER

10.02 OF TITLE 10 OF THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN

STREETS

Summary
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014; June 24, 2015; July 11, 2018; January 26, 2022; January 11, 2023, June 25, 2025 and September 10, 2025. Since the September 10, 2025 approval of the speed surveys, the following four (4) street segments have been studied:

Segment 7: Archibald Ave between River Road and Grapewin Street Segment 7A: River Road between Bluff Street and Kendra Lane Segment 22: Hamner Avenue between Limonite Ave and Bellegrave Avenue Segment 25: Hamner Avenue between Riverside Avenue and Philadelphia Street Background
Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of appropriate and safe travel speeds, and to protect the general public from the risks posed by reckless or unpredictable driving behavior.

Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752 951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
175
speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads.

Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

In California, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that speed limits be set using an Engineering and Traﬃc Survey (ETS), rather than through arbitrary methods. This approach ensures that speed limits are defensible and appropriate for the roadway condions. The CVC also includes the Basic Speed Law (Section 22350), which states:

“No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traﬃc on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”

Properly posted speed limits assist law enforcement in cing drivers who violate the Basic Speed Law and give drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The engineering and traﬃc survey study involves the three major elements of data collecon and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Secon 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traﬃc Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edion, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1 .

Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey
2 .

Collision records
3 .

Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:

Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideraon for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilies, users of personal assisve mobility devices, and the unhoused.

The City Council last adopted an Engineering and Traﬃc Survey on July 24, 2013, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023, June 25, 2025 and September 10, 2025. Since the September 10, 2025 approval of the speed surveys, the following four (4) street segments have been studied:

These segments were studied for the following reasons:

1. Reevaluation due to change in road characteristics:

Segment 7: Archibald Ave between River Road and Grapewin Street Segment 7A: River Road between Bluff Street and Kendra Lane 12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
176
Segment 22: Hamner Avenue between Limonite Ave and Bellegrave Avenue

2. Required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar:

Segment 25: Hamner Avenue between Riverside Avenue and Philadelphia Street.

Addionally, segment 7 of Archibald Avenue was divided into two segments (Segment 7 and Segment 7A) where Archibald Avenue transitions into River Road south of Kendra Lane.

Based on the ETS results, the recommended speed limit to be established at these four (4) segments is shown below:

Segment No.

Street
Between
Current Speed
Limit (mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
7 Archibald Avenue
River Road and Grapewin
Street
55 50
7A
River Road
Bluff Street and River Road
55 55
22 Hamner Ave
Limonite Avenue and
Bellegrave Avenue
45 45
25 Hamner Ave
Riverside Drive and
Philadelphia
50 45

The recommended speed limits were reviewed and found acceptable by the Riverside County Sheriff's Office, which provides contract law enfo
rcement services to the City of Eastvale.

To ensure enforceability, each speed limit recommendaon must be supported by an ETS that can withstand legal scruny. This survey includes all required documentaon under State law. Once the ordinance is adopted, updates to posted speed limits will be implemented accordingly.

Environmental
Approval of the agreement is categorically exempt from California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities.

Strategic Plan Action - Priority Level: 2
| Target #: 5
| Goal #: 7
Improve traffic mobility and management
Fiscal Impact
Several addional speed limit signs need to be installed at various locaons throughout the City. The total cost to install these speed limit signs is esmated to be $2,000. Funds are available in the Measure A fund, Capital Improvement Project number 92001, Account Number 210-510-6695- 92001-0000.
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
177
Prior City Council/Commission Action
On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale. Subsequent amendments were approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018, January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023, June 25, 2025 and September 10, 2025.

Attachment(s)
Attachment 1 - Ordinance

Attachment 2 -2026 Speed Survey Amendment Phase 3
12363 Limonite Avenue | Suite 910 | Eastvale, CA 91752
951.361.0900 |
eastvaleca.gov
178

ORDINANCE NO. 26-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE , CALIFORNIA, AMENDING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 10.02 OF TITLE 10 TO

THE EASTVALE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN STREETS

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358 provide that local entities may declare prima facie speed limits greater than 25 miles per hour on City streets on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 40802 provides for the enforcement of the posted speed limit by the use of radar or other electronic devices which measures the speed of moving vehicles; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 627(b) defin es an engineering and traffic survey to include consideration of all of the following:
1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements; 2) Collision Records;
3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver; and WHEREAS, the City of Eastvale has completed a new engineering and traffic survey required under California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EASTVALE, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 10.02 of Title10 to the Eastvale Municipal Code is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"Sec. 10.02.010. - Findings.
(a) The City Council of the City of Eastvale finds that an engineering and traffic survey has been completed in full compliance with the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the recommendations in the survey should be implemented. Based upon the review of the survey and related information, the City Council finds the prevailing or 85th percentile speeds of the vehicles are:

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 40
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 47
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 42 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 49
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 47
179

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
7 Archibald Avenue
River Road and Wind River/Grapewin Street 52
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 57
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 55
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 40 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 53 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 48
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 37
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 48
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 52 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 47
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 47
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 43 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 45 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 52
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 51
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 49
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 48
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 54
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 52
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 50
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 47
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 40
29 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 56
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 55
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 42
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 52
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 52
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 53
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 49
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 59 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 42 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 49
7A River Road Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane 60 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 44 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 48
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 57
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 49
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 48
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 51
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 43
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 43
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 43
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 51
180

No. Street Between
85th
%ile
Speed
(mph)
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 51
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 40

(b) Based on the review of the Survey, the City Council finds that the most appropriate speed limits to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic that is reasonable and safe for the above- listed streets are set forth herein.

Sec. 10.02.020. - Established.

The following speed limits are as established:

No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 35
2 65th Street
Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 40
3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 40
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East City Limit 35 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 45
6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 45
7 Archibald Avenue
River Road and Wind River/Grapewin Street 50
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman Road 50
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue / North City
Limit 50
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus 35 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 50 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 50
13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 30
14 Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway 50
15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 45 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 45
17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 40 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner Avenue 35 20 Hamner Avenue
South City Limit and Schleisman Road 45
21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 45
23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road 45
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive 45
25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 45
26 Harrison Avenue
Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 45
27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 45
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 35
181

No. Street Between Speed Limit
(mph)
29 Hellman Avenue
River Road and Chandler Street 50
30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 50
31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit 35
32 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 45
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 45
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 50
35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit 45
36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 55 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 30
38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 35 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 40
7A River Road Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane 55 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 40 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 45
42 Schleisman Road
Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 50
43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 45
44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 45
45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 45
46 Scholar Way
Citrus Street and Schleisman Road 35
47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 40
48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 40
49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 45
50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 45
51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 35

Sec. 10.02.030 - Direction to City Engineer. On or after the effective date of the Ordinance of which this Chapter is derived, the City Engineer is directed to clearly post speed limit signs effectuating Section 10.02.020 above, to give notice that this Chapter is in effect."

SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

182

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with the law.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ORDAINED this __ day of March, 2026.

__________________________________________
Jocelyn Yow
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

__________________________________________ __________________________________________ Erica Vega Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Attorney City Clerk/Government Services Director
183

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) §

CITY OF EASTVALE )

I, Marc A. Donohue, City Clerk/Government Services Director of the City of Eastvale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 26-XX, was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eastvale held on the 25th of February, 2026, and was passed by the City Council of the City of Eastvale at a regular meeting held on the XX of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Marc A. Donohue, MMC
City Clerk/Government Services Director
184

January 2026
Citywide Speed Zone Survey

Adopted on by Ordinance 26- Adopted on September 10, 2025 by Ordinance 25-10
Adopted on June 25, 2025 by Ordinance 25-06
Adopted on January 11, 2023 by Ordinance 23-13
Adopted on January 26, 2022 by Ordinance 22-01
Adopted on July 11, 2018 by Ordinance 2018-09
Adopted on June 24, 2015 by Ordinance 15-04
Adopted on February 12, 2014 by Ordinance 2014-01
Adopted on July 24, 2013 by Ordinance 2013-10

Approved By:

Jennifer Rosales, TE, PTOE
City Traffic Engineer*
TE 2761

Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra Group, Inc.
185

186

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY 3

3.0 SURVEY RESULTS 6

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey 6

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis 9

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review 12

4.0 SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13

4.1 Factors That May Be Considered 13

4.2 Recommended Speed Limits 13

4.3 Speed Limit Signing 14

5.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 15

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance 15

APPENDIX

APPENDICES
A Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
B Speed Zoning Regulations from the Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Definitions of Terms
C Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
D Strip Maps
E Speed Survey Data Sheets
F Collision Data Table
G Radar/Lidar Gun and Operator(s) Certifications

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE
1 Segment Spot Speed Survey 7
2 Collision Analysis 10

187

188
Introduction
1 SECTION 1.0

INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update and to establish the speed limits for four (4) segments of the City of Eastvale arterial street network.

The overall study was conducted to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within City boundaries.

Posted speed limits are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from reckless and unpredictable behavior of irresponsible drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.

The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Posted speed limits also provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method of identifying and apprehending violators of the Basic Speed Law (CVC Section 22350), which states: No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. The posted speed limit gives drivers a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

It is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 have been satisfied, that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are properly identified, and that the provisions of AB 43 have been incorporated in the analysis. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802(b) of the CVC requires that limits be established per Sections 22357 and 22358 of the CVC, the limits must be justified by an Engineering and Traffic Survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation. Section 40802(c) of the CVC allows cities to extend the survey period up to seven or 14 years depending on specific criteria.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, related to traffic safety, was signed into law on October 8, 2021. AB 43 modifies certain sections and adds new sections to the CVC pertaining to speed limits . Certain sections of AB 43 took effect on January 1, 2022, while other sections went into effect on January 1, 2023. All sections are currently in effect. Details of these CVC criteria and modifications are provided in Appendix A. CVC Section 627 also requires that the Engineering and Traffic Survey be conducted in accordance with the latest edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). Details of these CA MUTCD criteria are provided in Appendix B. AB 43 also modified sections of the CA MUTCD, which took effect on January 1, 2023, when Revision 8 of the CA MUTCD was approved, and on April 1, 2025, when Revision 9 of the CA MUTCD was approved.

On July 24, 2013, City Council approved the establishment and update of speed limits on street segments in Eastvale, followed by amendments approved on February 12, 2014, June 24, 2015, July 11, 2018 January 26, 2022, January 11, 2023, June 25, 2025, and September 10, 2025. Since the September 10, 2025, City Council approval of the speed surveys, the following four (4) street segments have been 189
Introduction
2 studied:
7 Archibald Avenue between River Road/Kendra Lane and Wind River/Grapewin Street 22 Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 25 Hamner Avenue between Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 7A River Road between Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane

A new segment, Number 7A is now River Road between Bluff Street to River Road/Kendra Lane which resulted from the segment split of Archibald Avenue from Bluff Street to Wind River/Grapewin Street into two segments.

The segments below were studied for the following reasons:

1. Roadway segment that required a resurvey in order to ensure speed limits are appropriate and enforceable by radar/lidar and has restriping due to roadway construction:
• Archibald Avenue between River Road/Kendra Lane and Wind River/Grapewin Street • Hamner Avenue between Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue • Hamner Avenue between Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street • River Road between Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane

This survey will either verify, increase, or decrease the existing speed limits for the four (4) selected roadway segments within the City of Eastvale, based on the data and results obtained.

At four (4) locations on the City’s network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing/updating prima facie speed limits. The data was collected in accordance with the latest edition of the CA MUTCD: CA MUTCD 2014, rev 9 (2025). Sections of the CA MUTCD that contain the regulations for conducting the required “Engineering and Traffic Survey” are presented in Appendix B. Also in Appendix B are definitions of terms used in speed zone surveys. As previously noted, excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix A. The speed zone radar surveys were conducted by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Certifications for their staff and equipment are provided in Appendix G. 190
Study Methodology
3 SECTION 2.0

STUDY METHODOLOGY

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and, therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on the fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgement of one or a few individuals. A radar spot speed survey is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those who use the roads. Speed limits are not based on the actions of few. The California Vehicle Code requires the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary methods.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, collision history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.

The engineering and traffic survey study involved the three major elements of data collection and analysis, as required by California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 627 and as outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Edition, rev 9. The three elements of an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as described in the CVC, are:

1. Prevailing speed as determined by a spot speed survey

2. Collision records

3. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver

Other factors that may also be considered include:
• Residential Density (as defined in CVC Section 627)
• Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

California Assembly Bill (AB) 43, passed in 2021, introduced concepts from Vision Zero into the determination of speed limits. AB 1938, passed in 2022, made further modifications. The goal of Vision Zero is to reduce traffic-related deaths and serious injuries to zero, based on the Safe System Approach. The basic tenet of Vision Zero is that human beings are vulnerable to traffic collisions, the severity of injuries and death are directly affected by speed, and roadway speeds should be reduced wherever p ossible, using the Safe System Approach, to achieve Vision Zero. AB 43 maintains the use of the 85th percentile speed as the base for setting speed limits, but makes it easier to reduce speed limits. The effects of AB 43 are discussed below, under Analysis.

191
Study Methodology
4 Spot Speed Survey. Spot speed surveys, performed by a certified radar technician utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted for five (5) roadway segments to determine existing vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations were recorded, 50 for each direction of travel, on all the surveyed street segments. This data was used to calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is traveling. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions.

Collision Rate. Mid-block traffic collision data for the five (5) roadway segments was tabulated from the City’s and County’s collision records as reported to the California Crash Reporting System (CCRS) for the period from January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 (two years). The collision rate was calculated and considered in recommending the speed limit.

Field Review . The streets were field reviewed to determine/confirm the existing roadway characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle activity (with increased consideration of vulnerable pedestrian groups), and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.

Analysis. The three elements and two other factors described above were used to determine the recommended speed limit. The analysis began with the 85th percentile speed from the spot speed survey and was modified, as appropriate, by the collision rate, pedestrian and bicycle activity, and existing conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The speed limit is initially established at the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. It can then be reduced by 5 mph if it meets one of the following two options:

Option 1. CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5 allow the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed under certain circumstances.

Option 2. For cases where the nearest 5 mph increment would require rounding up, CVC Section 21400(b) allows the speed limit to be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, however, no further reduction is allowed.

The following examples explain the use of these speed limit criteria:

A. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded down (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 37 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 35 mph), the speed limit could be reduced another 5 mph, to 30 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

B. Using Option 1, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph, so the speed limit would be established at 40 mph), the speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph, to 35 mph, if the special conditions are met and justification for using the lower speed limit are documented in the engineering and traffic survey.

C. Using Option 2, when the 85th percentile speed is rounded up (i.e. the 85th percentile speed is 38 mph and would normally be rounded up to 40 mph), instead of rounding up, the speed limit can be reduced by 5 mph (established at 35 mph), but no further reduction can be applied.

AB 43 also allows the speed limits as determined above, to be reduced an additional 5 mph or the existing speed limits to be maintained under certain conditions . If a local authority, after 192
Study Methodology
5 completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance:
• Reduce the speed limit by an additional five miles per hour on a section of highway designated as a Safety Corridor or if the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. • Retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit.
• Determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour.

A greater-than-expected collision rate is one of the special conditions under Option 1, allowing the speed limit to be established 5 mph lower than the rounded speed limit. The collision rate is based on mid-block collisions only. It is determined using the equation shown below and is then compared to the statewide average collision rate for similar roadways, found in Crash Data on California State Highways (Road Miles, Travel, Crashes, Crash Rates) published by Caltrans. The latest edition, 2023, was used for this 2025 analysis.

The collision rates are calculated using the following equation:

Collision Rate = Number of Midblock collisions x 10
6 24-hour volume x 365 x segment length x number of years Where: Number of midblock collisions based on 2 years (January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024 ), 24-hour traffic volume (both directions) in the survey segment and segment length in miles. Rates are shown in Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles (per year) or Col/MVM.

193
Survey Results
6 SECTION 3.0

SURVEY RESULTS

3.1 Spot Speed Radar Survey

Spot speed radar surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists. The speed limit should normally be established at the five mile per hour increment nearest the 85th percentile speed, as recorded for the surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as collision rates (Section 3.2) and Roadway Segment Field Review (Section 3.3) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and effective speed limits. Table 1 shows the existing speed limit and the 85th percentile speed for each studied segment.

The criteria used to conduct the radar survey are listed in Appendices A and B.

Appendix C contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the four (4) segments surveyed as well as those for segments previously studied. The data coll ected and information calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:

 Posted speed limit
 Direction of survey
 Date and time of speed survey
 Weather conditions
 Number of vehicles observed in each direction
 Speed of each surveyed vehicle
 15th percentile speed
 50th Percentile speed
 85th Percentile speed
 10 mph pace speed
 Percent over pace speed
 Percent in pace speed
 Percent under pace speed
 Average speed

The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, collision data, street classification, and any unusual conditions at the location. 194

7 Table 1: Segment Spot Speed Summary1
(Amended December 2025)

No. Street Between Dir.

Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
85th %ile
Speed
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)
Comments
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 40 46 40 No Change - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b) 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 40 47 40
No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street / East
City Limit E/W 35 42 35
No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 7 Archibald Avenue River Road/ Kendra Ln and Wind
River/Grapewin Street N/S 55 52 50 Decrease - 85th%ile
8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman
Road N/S 50 57 50
No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave Avenue /
North City Limit N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northernly Terminus E/W 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 11 Bellegrave Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue E/W 50 53 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 30 37 30 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Road Hamner Avenue and I-15 Freeway E/W 50 48 50 No Change - 85th%ile 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue E/W 45 52 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 47 45 No Change - 85th%ile 18 Fieldmaster Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 43 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Hamner
Avenue
N/S &
E/W 35 45 35 No Change – 85%ile, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2). Very heavy truck traffic, many peds & no bike lanes
20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road N/S 50 52 45 Decreased - 85th%ile, Option 1 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change, - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2, Matches segments to the north and south. 23 Bellegrave Avenue and Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road N/S 50 48 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the south. 24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside
Drive N/S 50 54 45 Reduced - 85th%ile, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2). Matches speed limits to the south. 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street N/S 50 52 45 Decrease – 85th%ile, Option 2. Matches segments to the south. 26 Harrison Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road N/S 45 50 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 45 47 45
No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety, particularly for vulnerable pedestrian groups
28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way N/S 45 40 40 Decrease - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b) 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street N/S 50 56 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue N/S 50 55 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 195

8 31 Limonite Avenue to North City Limit N/S None 42 35 Established Speed Limit – 85th%ile, Option 1 – Pedestrian & bicyclist safety; very heavy truck traffic
32 Limonite Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel E/W None 52 50 Established speed limit - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b), segment is "S" curve ending at flood control channel
33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald
Avenue E/W None 52 50
Established speed limit - 85th%ile, CVC 22358.6(b), segment is "S" curve ending at flood control channel
34 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 53 50 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 35 Sumner Avenue and East City Limit E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 36 Mission Boulevard S. Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) E/W None 59 55 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 30 45 30 No Change – AB 43 - New CVC Section 22358.8 38 Prairie Smoke Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road E/W 35 42 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 40 49 40 No Change – AB 43 – New CVC Section 22358.8 7a Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane N/S 55 60 55 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street E/W 40 44 40 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2. 42 Schleisman Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue E/W 50 57 50 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue E/W 45 49 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way E/W 45 48 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue E/W 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street and Schleisman Road N/S 35 43 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 2, CVC 22358.7 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue N/S 35 43 40 Increased - 85th%ile, Option 2 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue N/S None 43 40 Established Speed Limit - 85th%ile, Option 2 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue N/S 45 51 45 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road N/S 35 40 35 No Change - 85th%ile, Option 1 - Reduction of speed due to crash history

1Roadway segments studied for 2025 E&TS are highlighted in gray. 2 Segment of Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street was split into two segments at River Road/Kendra Lane. 3New segment No. 7A from Archibald Avenue split is now River Road from Bluff to River Road/Kendra Lane. 4See Appendix A for modifications to CVC by new CA law s, AB 43 & AB 1938. See Appendix B, Line 12a, for explanations of Option 1 and Option 2. 196

9 Survey Results

3.2 Collision Rate Analysis

The mid-block collision rate for each roadway segment was determined by using the most recent collision records as required by CVC Section 627. Traffic collision data for the five (5) roadway segments being studied was collected from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) collision records for the City of Eastvale from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024.

Based on this data, the mid-block collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment in terms of “collisions per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travel.”

It was then determined if any of the collision rates warranted a 5 mph reduction in the rounded 85th percentile speed per Option 1. The collision rates were compared to the statewide average collision rates for similar roadways. If the collision rate is greater than the statewide rate, a 5 mph reduction may be considered. Both of the calculated roadway segment collision rates were less than the statewide average, so neither road way segment qualified for the 5 mph reduction based on the collision rate.

The results of the collision rate calculations are shown in Table 2 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets (Appendix C). A sample collision rate calculation is shown below.

Example:

Collision Rate = Number of Collisions x 10
6 Vehicles/Day x 365 Days/Year x Miles x Years of Collision Data

Collision rate on: Hamner Avenue between Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road and Riverside Drive:

Collision Rate = 1 x 106
17,865 x 365 x 1.23 x 2

= 0.06 collisions per million vehicle miles (Col/MVM)

The comparison collision rates vary from year to year. The 2023 Statewide average rates, which are the most recent rates available, were used for the five (5) segments studied in the October 2025 analysis, and are shown in the table below.

No. Street Between Lane Type
Statewide
Collision
Rate1
7 Archibald Avenue River Road/ Kendra Ln and Wind
River/Grapewin Street 6 lanes, Divided 1.06
22 Hamner Avenue Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 6 lanes, Divided 1.06 25 Hamner Avenue Riverside Drive and Philadelphia Street 6 lanes, Divided 1.06 7A River Road Bluff Street and River Road/Kendra Lane
4 lanes, Divided &
4 lanes, Undivided 1.06
1 Statewide Collision Rates listed are averages for Suburban (Rural Inside City + Urban Outside City) roads.

197

10 Table 2: Collision Analysis
(Amended December 2025)

No. Street Between
Segment
Length
(miles)
Segment
Length
(feet)
Average
Daily Traffic
(ADT)
(vehs/day)
Midblock
Collisions2
Collision
Rate
(Col/MVM) 3
Statewide
Collision
Rate
Segment
Rate More
Than
Statewide
Rate?
1 58th Street Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.49 2,568 1,522 0 0.00 1.60 No 2 65th Street Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 6,155 0 0.00 1.24 No 3 Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 0.87 4,590 3,755 1 0.24 0.93 No 4 Hamner Avenue and Wells Spring Street 0.31 1,642 2,561 0 0.00 1.60 No 5 68th Street Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.00 5,260 5,239 1 0.17 1.32 No 6 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 0.50 2,650 8,469 1 0.22 0.93 No 7 Archibald
Avenue River Road and Wind River/Grapewin Street 0.62 3,250 15,804 4 0.56 1.06 No 8 Wind River/Grapewin Street and Schleisman
Road 1.63 8,580 20,934 7 0.19 1.29 No
9 Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City
Limit 1.14 6,010 22,487 3 0.11 0.98 No
10 Baron Road Archibald Avenue and Northerly Terminus 0.38 2,030 369 0 0.00 1.60 No 11 Bellegrave
Avenue Sumner Avenue and Hamner Avenue 1.07 5,650 10,629 2 0.16 0.78 No 12 Hamner Avenue and East City Limit 1.03 5,450 10,308 0 0.00 0.93 No 13 Blossom Way Harrison Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.50 2,650 2,497 0 0.00 1.60 No 14 Cantu-Galleano
Ranch Rd Hamner Ave and I-15 Freeway 0.44 2,320 31,187 1 0.10 1.06 No 15 Chandler Street Hellman Avenue and Harrison Avenue 1.53 8,075 3,828 1 0.16 0.91 No 16 Citrus Street Harrison Avenue and Scholar Way 0.99 5,247 11,140 3 0.25 1.14 No 17 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.50 2,626 7,787 2 0.47 1.39 No 18 Fieldmaster
Street Hall Road and Archibald Avenue 0.99 5,215 1,616 0 0.00 1.32 No 19 Goodman Way Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Hamner Avenue 0.68 3,600 6,365 9 2.84 1.11 Yes 20 Hamner Avenue South City Limit and Schleisman Road 0.62 3,295 18,287 1 0.08 0.98 No 21 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 1.00 5,275 18,890 11 0.53 0.41 Yes 22 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.88 4,640 22,223 7 0.49 1.06 No 23 Bellegrave Avenue & Cantu-Galleano Ranch
Road 0.83 4,400 25,139 3 0.20 1.17 No
24 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive 1.23 6,500 17,865 1 0.06 1.33 No 25 Riverside Drive & Philadelphia Street 0.88 4,640 24,070 0 0.00 1.06 No 26 Harrison
Avenue Chandler Street and Schleisman Road 1.00 5,266 5,333 1 0.17 0.93 No 27 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 8,461 2 0.16 0.93 No 28 Limonite Avenue and Blossom Way 0.21 1,100 3,015 0 0.00 1.24 No 29 Hellman Avenue River Road and Chandler Street 0.97 5,100 6,324 2 0.30 1.32 No 198

11 30 Chandler Street and Limonite Avenue 1.54 8,120 10,594 3 0.27 0.93 No 31 Limonite Avenue and North City Limit 0.20 1,070 7,317 0 0.00 0.91 No 32 Limonite
Avenue Hellman Avenue to Cucamonga Creek Channel 0.60 3,150 14,735 1 0.16 1.17 No 33 Cucamonga Creek Channel to Archibald Avenue 0.56 2,950 15,549 0 0.00 1.17 No 34 Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue 1.00 5,300 22,300 8 0.49 1.17 No 35 Sumner Avenue & East City Limit 1.53 8,100 38,582 12 0.28 1.06 No 36 Mission
Boulevard S Milliken Avenue and Ontario Freeway (I-15) 0.50 2,620 19,234 0 0.00 0.86 No 37 Orange Street Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,630 1,027 1 1.78 1.60 Yes 38 Prairie Smoke
Road Hellman Avenue and Whitewell Road 0.26 1,380 1,129 0 0.00 1.60 No 39 River Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 0.75 3,970 7,806 4 0.62 1.32 No 7a Bluff Street and River Road 0.82 4,340 24,689 3 0.20 1.06 No 40 Riverboat Drive Massy Harris Way and Wells Springs Street 0.66 3,500 735 0 0.00 1.32 No 41 Riverside Drive Hamner Avenue & East City Limit 0.44 2,300 20,231 3 0.47 1.33 No 42 Schleisman
Road Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue 1.00 5,300 34,671 11 0.29 0.98 No 43 Archibald Avenue and Sumner Avenue 0.99 5,238 14,855 2 0.12 0.93 No 44 Sumner Avenue and Scholar Way 0.50 2,650 7,737 1 0.24 1.32 No 45 Scholar Way and Hamner Avenue 0.58 3,040 7,682 0 0.00 0.91 No 46 Scholar Way Citrus Street & Schleisman Road 0.63 3,300 6,389 0 0.00 1.24 No 47 Schleisman Road and Limonite Avenue 0.99 5,250 4,721 0 0.00 0.91 No 48 Limonite Avenue and Bellegrave Avenue 0.70 3,700 6,678 1 0.20 1.60 No 49 Sumner Avenue Citrus Street and 65th Street 1.12 5,935 4,028 0 0.00 0.93 No 50 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue 1.03 5,422 7,857 2 0.23 0.93 No 51 Whitewell Road Schleisman Road and Prairie Smoke Road 0.29 1,542 2,056 2 3.06 1.60 Yes

1 Newly-surveyed roadway segments are highlighted in gray. 2 Number of speed-related mid-block traffic collisions during most recently available 2 -year period for newly surveyed segments and 3- year period for prior segments. 3 Col/MVM = Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles per year; An actual rate greater than state average rate indicates condition that may allow a lower speed limit. 4 Segment of Archibald Avenue between Bluff Street and Wind River/Grapewin Street was split into two segments at River Road/Kendra Lane. New segment No. 7A from Archibald Avenue split is now River Road from Bluff to River Road/Kendra Lane.

199

12 Survey Results

3.3 Roadway Segment Field Review

Section 2B.13 of the CA MUTCD 2014, “Speed Limit Signs” states that the speed limit should be established at the nearest five mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed recorded during the spot speed survey. However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction in speed, as allowed under Option 1. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed survey or in the accompanying engineering report.

The roadway segments were driven and videorecorded by Mr. Alan Perkins, Senior Engineering Technician, and reviewed by Ruth Smith, Senior Traffic Engineer (contracted through Ardurra Group).

The roadway characteristics, location of speed limit signs, conditions not readily apparent to the driver (lack of sidewalks/bike lanes, driveways with limited sight distance, clustered driveways, heavy truck activity, etc.), type of land use adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway (divided, undivided, number of lanes, on-street parking etc.) were noted in the study on the Strip Maps, found in Appendix D. The roadway characteristics recorded were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627 and Section 22358.6(b).

The results of the roadway segment field review for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

 Collision History
 Collision Rate
 Average Daily Traffic Volume
 Road Description, including on-street parking and unusual lane configurations  Factors Indicating Land or Facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, including the presence of sidewalks, bikeways, crosswalks, schools, parks, employment centers, retail, senior centers, cultural areas, religious facilities, health/medical facilities and transit stops
 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Truck activity
 Driveways with limited sight distance or clustered driveways  Adjacent Land Uses
200
Survey Findings and Recommendations
13 SECTION 4.0

SURVEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Factors That May Be Considered

In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627 described in Appendix A, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed limit five mph below the rounded 85th percentile speed under Option 1.

The factors to be considered are highway, traffic, and roadside conditions, specifically including those listed below, however, factors that are readily apparent to motorists are not to be considered.

• Most recent collision record (mid-block)
• Roadway characteristics
• Shoulder condition
• Grade
• Alignment
• Sight Distance
• Roadside development and environment
• Parking practices and pedestrian activity
• Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
• Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
• Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
• Residential density

The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary sheets in Appendix C.

4.2 Recommended Speed Limits

The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held with City staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration of any special knowledge of the segment. Table 1 shows the surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits. Table 2, the amended Collision Survey Analysis, lists the street traffic volumes, total number of collisions and calculated collision rate. 201
Survey Findings and Recommendations
14 4.3 Speed Limit Signing

All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 55 MPH speed laws and are tested on the subject when applying for a driver’s license. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions need not be posted on City streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the continued violation of a residential 25 MPH speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.

It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.

Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the City streets which have been speed zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important intersections where there is high side-street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate information while not over-signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.

Enforcement issues can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.

202
Summary and Conclusions

15 SECTION 5.0

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Summary and Conclusions

1. The radar survey and the raw data collection were conducted per CVC Section 627 and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, rev 9, Section 2B.13.

2. Radar speed surveys and daily traffic counts for four (4) of the selected roadway segments on the City’s arterial roadway network were collected in 2025 on October 28 and May 23.

3. Bicycle and Pedestrian mid-block collision frequency was low.

4. A summary of recommended speed limits is provided in Table 1.

5. It was concluded that the existing speed limits on two (2) of the four (4) studied roadway segments in the City of Eastvale should be changed, as listed below.

Roadway Segments with Recommended Changes to Speed Limit

No.

Street

Between
Existing
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Recommended
Speed Limit
(mph)

Comments
7 Archibald
Avenue
River Road/ Kendra Lane and
Wind River/Grapewin Street 55 50 Reducing speed limit
by 5 mph – 85th
percentile speed
25 Hamner
Avenue
Riverside Drive and
Philadelphia Street 50 45 Reducing speed limit
by 5 mph – 85th
percentile speed,
Option 2, & CVC
22358.7(a)(2),
provides continuity to
segments to the south

5.2 Speed Limit Ordinance

Based on the recommended speed zone changes, the revised “Speed Zone Ordinances” are as provided on the following pages.
203

APPENDIX A
Regulations Governing Speed Limits
(Excerpts from the California Vehicle Code)
(Updated August 2025)
204

205
1 Appendix A

RADAR SPEED ZONE SURVEYS

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of an Engineering and Traffic Survey for establishment of speed limits on city streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code. The review included radar surveys of prevailing vehicle speeds for each roadway segment, recent traffic counts, an analysis of reported traffic collisions recorded during the specific two -year interval of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2024, a nd a field review of each roadway segment regarding roadway characteristics.

In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five years. Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:

If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span between studies can be extended to seven years.

If after seven years, “ …a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume…” the time span between studies can be extended to 14 years.

Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using radar enforcement. Through adoption of this Engineering and Traffic Survey, the police department will be able to enforce posted speed limits with radar equipment. 206
2 Appendix A

REGULATIONS GOVERNING SPEED LIMITS

Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph). All other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal conditions. Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 mph limit in business and residential districts; the 15 mph limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are going to and from school.

Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 mph may be established by local authorities based on engineering and traffic surveys. Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, collision records, and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study. If speed limits are established below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are difficult to enforce. Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely, subject to equitable enforcement action.

The California Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on an engineering and traffic survey within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using radar or lidar enforcement.

APPLICABLE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS
Increase of Local Limits

22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima faci e speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey.

The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.

Decrease of Local Limits

22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 207
3 Appendix A

40, 35, 30, 25, 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to include “20 or 15” and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Downward Speed Zoning Exceptions

22358.5 It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Initial Rounding to Nearest Five MPH

22358.6 (a) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the ne arest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. (b) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest fi ve mile per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30, 2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and traffic survey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take into consideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.
(c) In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five mil es per hour increment. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limit shall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).
(d) In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Section 22358.7.
(e) The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shall not exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed. (f) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain the currently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction.

Note: Section 22358.6 was modified by Assembly Bill 1938, and the modifications became effective on January 1, 2023.

Additional Five MPH Reduction

22358.7 (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine 208
4 Appendix A

and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b) (1) As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.
(2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).

In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner. Note: Revision 8 of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 2014 Edition, effective on January 26, 2023, includes the provisions of this section, making them currently effective.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.7 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43, and became effective on January 1, 2022.

Maintaining Existing Speed Limit

22358.8. (a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.8 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 209
5 Appendix A

1, 2022, then was amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Business Activity District Prima Facie Speed Limit

22358.9. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses , including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Note: Section 22358.9 was added to the CVC by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.

Speed Trap 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

40802. (a) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
210
6 Appendix A

(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022 , and was then amended by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)

(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 regarding “local street or road” with no change to the meaning and became effective on January 1, 2022.):

(D) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(E) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (F) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any schoolgrounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in used by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.

(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity center” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit ha s been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (This section was added by CA AB 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

211
7 Appendix A

(c) (1) When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:

(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting office r has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C) (i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356 or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.

(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B) (i) A particular section of highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to local street, road or school zone, senior zone, business activity district or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add “senior zone, or business 212
8 Appendix A

activity district” and became effective on January 1, 2022, and was then modified by Assembly Bill 1938, which became effective on January 1, 2023.)

Speed Trap Evidence

40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (c)When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.

Engineering and Traffic Survey

627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities.

(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all the following

(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Collision records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio of 213
9 Appendix A

separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. (This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

Business District

235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District

515. A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling housed or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

Business and Residence District: Determination

240. In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
(a) No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building is within 75 feet of the roadway.
(b) Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway is within a district.
(c) All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
(d) A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by vehicles from the contiguous property.

214
10 Appendix A

Maximum Speed Limit

22349. Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

Basic Speed Law

22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations

22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.

(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits

22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:

(a) Fifteen miles per hour:

1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.

2) When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right -of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.

3) On any alley.

(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
215
11 Appendix A

1) On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.

2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For the purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.

3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds avai lable to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 to add the grant funding, and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

State Highways within Local Jurisdictions

22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which de clared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway.

(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

(This section was modified by Assembly Bill 43 and became effective on January 1, 2022.)

22354.5 (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to increase or decrease the existing speed limit on a particular 216
12 Appendix A

portion of a state highway pursuant to Section 22354, it shall, prior to increasing or decreasing that speed limit, consult with, and take into consideration the recommendations of, the Department of the California Highway Patrol.

(b) The city council or board of supervisors of a city or county through which any portion of a state highway subject to subdivision (a) extends may conduct a public hearing on the proposed increase or decrease at a convenient location as near as possible to t hat portion of state highway. The Department of Transportation shall take into consideration the results of the public hearing in determining whether to increase or decrease the speed limit.

Boundary Line Streets

22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Multiple-Lane Highways

22361. On multiple -lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to 22359, inclusive.

217
13 Appendix A

218

219

APPENDIX B
Speed Zoning Regulations from
Caltrans California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices And Definitions of Terms
(Updated August 2025)
220

221
17 Appendix B

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices1
(Regarding Speed Limits)
(Updated August 2025)

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public. Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers. 00a The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates.

Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study.

The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another. 04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a 222
18 Appendix B

particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 14 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.

11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th- percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

CVC Section 22358.6 – 85th-Percentile, Rounding, 5 mph Increment, 5 mph speed reduction and Maximum Speed Reduction
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph speed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)).

Option:

1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. CVC Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, may also be considered, if applicable. See Standard below for documentation requirements. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(b).

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(f). Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(c).

3. Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).
12c The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC 223
19 Appendix B

Section22358.6(b)), additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2)), this speed reduction shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85 th-
percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Support:
12d Refer to Tables 2B -103(CA) and 2B -104(CA), which provides examples of 85 th-percentile speed values and the application of the speed limit policies and criteria applicable per CVC 22358.6 and 22358.7.

12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with the Department’s Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(f).

Support:
12e Any existing E&TS that was performed before January 1, 2022 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to be updated until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 14 year criteria.

CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 – Applicability on State Highway System & Local Agency Roadways Standard:
12f CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies shall not be applicable to roadways on the State Highway System.

Support:
12g CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are applicable on local agency roadways.
12h CVC Sections 22358.7, 22358.8 and 22358.9 and their related policies are also applicable on any privately owned and maintained roads or commercial establishments, if the private road or private property has been subjected to the CVC application by the private property owner or a particular city or county enacts an ordinance or resolution to this effect. Refer to CVC Sections 21100, 21100.1, 21107, 21107.5, 21107.6, and 21107.7.

Standard:
12i The additional 5 mph speed reduction allowed by CVC Section 22358.7 on designated safety corridors or on portions of highway adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State 224
20 Appendix B

Highway System
12j The option allowed by CVC Section 22358.8 to retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit, shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.
12k Declaring prima facie speed limits of 25 mph or 20 mph on a highway contiguous to a business activity district allowed by CVC Section 22358.9 shall not be applicable on any roadway segment that is on the State Highway System.

CVC Section 22358.7 – Safety corridor and Land or Facilities Generating High Concentrations of Bicyclists and Pedestrians
Standard:
12l Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b), as included in paragraph 12a,
and Options #1 and #2 processes, is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7.

Option:
12m Local agencies may additionally lower the speed limits by 5 mph from those calculated using rounding (up or down) per CVC Section 22358.6(b) and 22358.6(c) and 5 mph speed reduction using CVC Section 22358.6(b) if, after completing an E&TS, find that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, for either of the following reasons:

1. The portion of a highway has been designated as a safety corridor.

2. The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(1) – “Safety Corridor” Definition Standard:
12n A safety corridor shall be defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur.
12o One or more of the required crash weighting factors listed in the Table 2B-105(CA) shall be used to prioritize the locations of fatal and serious injury crashes in developing the “Safety Corridor”.

Option:
12p Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

Standard:
12q The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.
12r Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network.

Guidance:
12s A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data.

Option:
12t For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. 12u To identify logical termini, the geographic extent of a safety corridor may be determined by non-engineering staff.

Standard:
225
21 Appendix B

12v A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS.

Option:
12w Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor. Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators.

CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2) – “Land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians” definition Standard:
12x Except for the Option in first paragraph below, a land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians shall be defined as the portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA) are present within a distance of 1320 feet.

Option:
12y Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Option:
12z Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five-year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed in Table 2B-106(CA).

Standard:
12aa A highway segment shall be defined as the portion of the highway where a location that meets the aforementioned criteria is present within a distance of 1320 feet. Option:
12ab A highway segment may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one location within the top twenty percent of fatal and serious injury pedestrian and/or bicyclist crashes within a three-to-five-year period is present for every 1320 feet. Standard:
12ac The top twenty percent of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injury crashes within a three to five year period shall be based on the geographic area within the jurisdiction of the Engineer performing the E&TS.

Option:
12ad A high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists may be longer than 1320 feet provided that a minimum of one generator is present for every 1320 feet.
12ae Data used to determine high concentration locations may be obtained from the most recently performed Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS). Standard:
12af The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additionally lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12ag Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.

Standard:
12ah Currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ai If local agency decides to use lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
226
22 Appendix B

CVC Section 22358.9 – Business Activity District
Option:
12aj A local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 mph prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 mph if the highway segment meets all of the following conditions:

1. A maximum of four traffic lanes.

2. A maximum posted 30 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 mph speed limit.

3. A maximum posted 25 mph prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 mph speed limit.
12ak A “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets a least three of the following four requirements:

4. No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.

5. Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.

6. Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. 7. Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device.

Standard:
12al A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted for designated safety corridors (CV Section 22358.7) or using the land or facility adjacent to high concentration of pedestrians and bicyclists (CVC Section 22358.7) or retained the currently adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8) or have restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit (CVC Section 22358.8). Refer to CVC Section 22358.9(c). 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are 227
23 Appendix B

traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section.

If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 228
24 Appendix B

vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 mile the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph a or b.

B. Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused. 30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Department of Transportation’s District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
• A north arrow
• Engineer's station or post mileage
• Limits of the proposed zones
• Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
• Collision rates for the zones involved
• Average daily traffic volume
• Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
• If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel • Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
• The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
• Recommendations and supporting reasons.
• The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials. • The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that 229
25 Appendix B

conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency. 32 Any agency may lower the speed limit below the prima facie speed limit after performing, and based on the results of an E&TS.

Guidance:
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surface in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed.

Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 mile and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352. 40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed 230
26 Appendix B

approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder. • R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
• The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
• The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment. • The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
231
27 Appendix B

• The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
• Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
• At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by the Department of Transportation, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
• Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment. • At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
• The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder. • Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
• At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals. 63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed 232
28 Appendix B

limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX. The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
233
29 Appendix B

79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Department of Transportation’s District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of the Department of Transportation retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
234
30 Appendix B

b. The Department may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
c. Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
a. Whenever the Department of Transportation determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Department may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
b. A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.

Support:
95 Senior zone is an area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign pursuant to CVC Section 22352. 96 Business activity district is a section of highway described in CVC Section 22358.9(b) in which a standard 25 mph or 20 mph speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to CVC Section 22358.9(a)(1).

Standard:
97 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 98 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
99 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
• The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
• The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
100 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are 235
31 Appendix B

met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
101 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Support:
102 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
103 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys.

An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
104 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
105 If warranted, the Department of Transportation’s District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

Support:
106 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
107 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
108 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part

Speed Zones and Traffic Signals
Standard:
109 An agency changing the speed limits within its jurisdiction shall report the speed limit change to the agency operating and maintaining traffic signals within the speed zone no later than 30 days before changing the posted speed limit.

Support:
110 Changing the signal timing and adjusting the advance detector loops based on the revised speed limits can enhance the operations of the traffic signal.

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

236
32 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

237
33 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

238
34 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

239
35 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

240
36 Appendix B

1 Black text is consistent with the federal MUTCD, blue text is where the CA MUTCD differs from the federal MUTCD, green text was added to the CA MUTCD in compliance with AB 43 & AB 1938.

241
37 Appendix B

Definitions of Selected Terms Used in the CA MUTCD

Text Headings

Standard—a statement of required, mandatory, or specifically prohibitive practice regarding a traffic control device. All Standard statements are labeled, and the text appears in bold type. The verb “shall” is typically used. The verbs “should” and “may” are not used in Standard statements.

Standard statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Guidance—a statement of recommended, but not mandatory, practice in typical situations, with deviations allowed if engineering judgment or engineering study indicates the deviation to be appropriate. All Guidance statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type. The verb “should” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “may” are not used in Guidance statements.

Guidance statements are sometimes modified by Options.

Option—a statement of practice that is a permissive condition and carries no requirement or recommendation. Option statements sometime contain allowable modifications to a Standard or Guidance statement. All Option statements are labeled, and the text appears in non-bolded type.

The verb “may” is typically used. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Option statements.

Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. Support statements are labeled, and the text appears in non- bolded type. The verbs “shall,” “should,” and “may” are not used in Support statements.

Words and Phrases

Speed—speed is defined based on the following classifications:
(a) Average Speed —the summation of the instantaneous or spot -measured speeds at a specific location of vehicles divided by the number of vehicles observed. (b) Design Speed—a selected speed used to determine the various geometric design features of a roadway.
(c) 85th-Percentile Speed—the speed at or below which 85 percent of the motor vehicles travel.
(d) Operating Speed—a speed at which a typical vehicle or the overall traffic operates.

Operating speed might be defined with speed values such as the average, pace, or 85th- percentile speeds.
(e) Pace—the 10 mph speed range representing the speeds of the largest percentage of vehicles in the traffic stream.
242
38 Appendix B

Speed Limit—the maximum (or minimum) speed applicable to a section of highway as established by law or regulation.

Posted Speed Limit—a speed limit determined by law or regulation and displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Speed Zone—a section of highway with a speed limit that is established by law or regulation, but which might be different from a legislatively specified statutory speed limit.

Statutory Speed Limit—a speed limit established by legislative action that typically is applicable for a particular class of highways with specified design, functional, jurisdictional and/or location characteristics and that is not necessarily displayed on Speed Limit signs.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) —the average 24 hour volume, being the total volume during a stated period divided by the number of days in that period. Normally, this would be periodic daily traffic volumes over several days, not adjusted for days of the week or seasons of the year.

Bicycle Lane—a portion of a roadway that has been designated for preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists by pavement markings and, if used, signs. See Class II Bikeway.

Business District - A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the ab ove ratio of buildings in use for business to the length of the highway exists. Refer to CVC 235.

CVC – California Vehicle Code.

Class II Bikeway (such as a Bike Lane) – Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians prohibited, but with vehicle parking and crossflows by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Refer to California Streets and Highways Code Section 890.4. Refer to Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.2 for design criteria.

Divided Highway – A highway with separated roadbeds for traffic in opposing directions.

Engineer – a person registered under California Professional Engineers Act as a professional engineer, including any of the branches thereof. Refer to California Business and Professions Code Section 6706. 63b. Engineering and Traffic Survey – Refer to CVC 627.

Engineering Judgment—the evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. Engineering judgment shall be 243
39 Appendix B

exercised by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. Documentation of engineering judgment is not required.

Engineering Study —the comprehensive analysis and evaluation of available pertinent information, and the application of appropriate principles, engineering judgment, experience, education, discretion, provisions, and practices as contained in this Manual and other sources, for the purpose of deciding upon the applicability, design, operation, or installation of a traffic control device. An engineering study shall be performed by an engineer, or by an individual working under the supervision of an engineer, through the application of procedures and criteria established by the engineer. An engineering study shall be documented.

Median—the area between two roadways of a divided highway measured from edge of traveled way to edge of traveled way. The median excludes turn lanes. The median width might be different between intersections, interchanges, and at opposite approaches of the same intersection.

Multi-Lane—more than one lane moving in the same direction. A multi -lane street, highway, or roadway has a basic cross -section comprised of two or more through lanes in one or both directions. A multi-lane approach has two or more lanes moving toward the intersection, including turning lanes.

Pedestrian—a person on foot, in a wheelchair, on skates, or on a skateboard. As per CVC 467, (a) A "pedestrian" is a person who is afoot or who is using any of the following: (1) A means of conveyance propelled by human power other than a bicycle. (2) An electric personal assistive mobility device. (b) "Pedestrian" includes a person who is operating a self-propelled wheelchair, motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle and, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian, as specified in subdivision(a).

Pedestrian Facilities —a general term denoting improvements and provisions made to accommodate or encourage walking.

Roadway—that portion of a highway improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel and parking lanes, but exclusive of the sidewalk, berm, or shoulder even though such sidewalk, berm, or shoulder is used by persons riding bicycles or other human- powered vehicles. In the event a highway includes two or more separate roadways, the term roadway as used in this Manual shall refer to any such roadway separately, but not to all such roadways collectively. Refer to CVC 527.

Shared-Use Path (Class I Bikeway) —a bikeway outside the traveled way and physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent alignment. Shared- use paths are also used by pedestrians (including skaters, users of manual and motorized wheelchairs, and joggers) and other authorized motorized and non- motorized users. Refer to the Caltrans’ Highway Design Manual Index 1003.1 for design criteria.
244
40 Appendix B

Shoulder – The portion of the highway contiguous with the roadway for accommodations of pedestrians, bicyclists, stopped vehicles, for emergency use, and for lateral support of base and surface courses.

Sidewalk—that portion of a street between the curb line, or the lateral line of a roadway, and the adjacent property line or on easements of private property that is paved or improved and intended for use by pedestrians. As per CVC 555, "Sidewalk" is that portion of a highway, other than the roadway, set apart by curbs, barriers, markings or other delineation for pedestrian travel.

Traffic Control Device—a sign, signal, marking, or other device used to regulate, warn, or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), pedestrian facility, or shared-use path by authority of a public agency or official having jurisdiction, or, in the case of a private road open to public travel (see definition of private road open to public travel), by authority of the private owner or private official having jurisdiction.
245

APPENDIX C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary Sheets
(Updated January 2026)

246

247
Location: 58th Street
Between: Scholar Way & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 1
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,522
2,586

0.49 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk on north side only at Scholar Way.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded to 40 mph, then reduced 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

Ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
248
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 2
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
40 mph
No Change, same as existing
85th percentile speed, Option 1 & CVC 22358.6(c)
Residential
38 - 47 mph
40 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Heavy pedestrian & vehicular traffic during school. Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and bike traffic.

Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane, Divided. Straight alignment. Bike lanes, but substandard.

Comments:

Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary at Harrison Ave.

Residences do not front on 65th St. - no direct access. 46 65th Street
Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
6,155
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/ painted median
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C 249
Location: 65th Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 3
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group 85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced 5mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No

0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalk located next to curb, so vehicular traffic is in close proximity to pedestrians and any bike traffic. Near Cedar Creek Park at Cedar Creek Rd. Rosa Parks Elementary School at Harrison Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:
40 mph
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
3,755
5,300

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
40 mph
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 12/21/2021
Appendix C
250
Location: 65th Street
Between: Hamner Avenue & Wells Spring Street/East City Limit Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 4
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,561
1,642

0.31 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
30-39 mph
35 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
No
35 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
251
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 5
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily
Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.32 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

1.00 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sun for westbound direction is very bright in the evening. No bike lanes. Street parking near Harada Park.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
252
Location: 68th Street Survey Date: February 10, 2021
Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segment No.: 6 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.93 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Road transitions from 2 lanes each direction undivided at Hamner Avenue to 2 lanes undivided at City Limits.

Roadway Geometrics:
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comme
nts:
trucks present, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
No
45 mph
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
253
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 7
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
1/16/2026
Jennifer Rosales, TE, PTOE TR 2761 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Yes
85th percentile speed. Provides continuity with segments to the north.

Residential, Church, School, Equestrian Center
40-49 mph
55 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
4 0.56

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane
Roadway Geometrics:
6-Lane divided with bike lanes. Segment of missing sidewalk. Curved alignment.

Comments:
52 Archibald Avenue
River Rd/Kendra Ln to Wind River/Grapewin S
North/South
Traffic Data
15,804
3,250

0.62 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
254
Location: Archibald Avenue
Between: Wind River/Grapewin Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 8
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.29 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
20,934
8,580

1.63 3NB/SB Lanes w/Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
48-57 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
255
Location: Archibald Avenue Survey Date: February 18, 2021 Between: Schleisman Road and Bellegrave/North City Limi t Segment No.: 9 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
22,487
6,010

1.14 3SB, 2NB w/Painted & Raised Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
4 0.14, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Speed limit sign n/o 65th St is in poor condition and not regulatory size. 3SB/3NB Lanes at Schleisman merge to 3SB/2NB Lanes at Branding Iron Dr to s/o 65th, 3SB/2NB Lane from n/o 65th to Providence Wy, 2SB/2NB Providence Wy to Limonite, 1SB/1NB from Limonite to NCL.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial-Retail / Light Industrial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
256
Location: Baron Road Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Between: Archibald Avenue & Northernly Terminus Segment No.: 10 Direction of Travel: E
ast/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to on-street parking and residential density )
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
369
2,030

0.38 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
27-36 mph
35 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Cul-de-sac near River Road.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
on-street parking and residential density
Residential / Public Facilities / Conservation
35 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
257
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Sumner Avenue & Hamner Avenue Segment No.: 11
Direction of Travel: E
ast/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.78
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,629
5,650

1.07 Single Lane Each Direction w/ Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
53 mph
45-54 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. No sidewalk on north side. Construction cones along segment from w/o Mill Creek Rd to Hamner Ave on WB direction only.

Houses being built NW of Hamner Ave.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments
:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped Property
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
258
Location: Bellegrave Avenue Survey Date: February 17, 2021 Between: Hamner Avenue & East City Limit Segm ent No.: 12 Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Lim
it:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,308
2,575

0.49 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted median
Major
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2EB/2WB w/o Homecoming, 1EB/1WB from Homecoming to City Limit.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comments
:
trucks present
High Density Residential / Commercial
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
259
Location: Blossom Way
Between: Harrison Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 13
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.60 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
me
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,497
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
37 mph
27-36 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 1EB/1WB lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Vertical Curve at I-15.

Comments
:
ped/bike safety
High Density Residential / Commercial
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section created by AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed limit considered too high due to ped/bike safety
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
260
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 14
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
10/24/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd
Hamner Avenue to I-15 Freeway
East/West
Traffic Data
31,187
2,320

0.44 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Light Industrial & Commercial
40-49 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.10

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes, Heavy truck traffic at times.

Roadway Geometrics:
3 lanes each direction w/raised median. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety. At freeway interchange.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 No
85th percentile speed.

Appendix C
261
Location: Chandler Street
Between: Hellman Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Survey Date: July 22, 2021
Segment No.: 15
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,828
8,075

1.53 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial / Collector
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
1 0.16, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Painted Median from Archibald to Harrison. Raised Median from Hellman to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Comm
ercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
262
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Harrison Avenue to Scholar Way
Survey Date: May 19, 2022
Segment No.: 16
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.14 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2022
3 0.17, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
2 EB and 2 WB lanes with bike lanes between Harrison and Scholar.

Comments:

Buffered Bike lane in each direction between Scholar and Cobble Creek. Regular Bike Lane in each direction between Cobble Creek and Harrison Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 MPH decrease
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 45 mph, then reduced another 5 mph due to ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
11,140 vpd
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/painted Median and Bike Lanes Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/23/2022
Roadway Geometrics:

Painted median between Hamner and Scholar Way.

Appendix C
263
Location: Citrus Street
Between: Scholar Way to Hamner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 17
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.39 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.47, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction
Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,787
2,626

0.50 1 Lane Each Direction w/painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
9/28/2022
Appendix C
264
Location: Fieldmaster Street
Between: Hall Road and Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 18
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,616
5,215

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Established shoulders, but no bike lanes. Adjacent Halfmoon Park at Cherry Creek Circle.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curves.

Comments:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
265
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 19
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
10/24/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
45 Goodman Avenue
Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd & Hamner Ave
North/South & East/West
Traffic Data
6,365
3,600

0.68 3-Lane Undivided
Local Road
Speed Survey Data
Mix of Retail/Big Box/Warehouse Uses
35-44 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
9 2.85

1.11 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy truck traffic making mid-block turns. No bike lanes, but mixed-use path on south & east sides. Parking not allowed. Many peds crosing during shift change.

Roadway Geometrics:
1 lane NB & 2 lanes SB for N/S, 2 lanes in each direction for E/W. 2-way left turn lane on both segments.

Roadway is generally N/S, but makes a 90 degree turn to west at the south end & proceeds E/W to Hamner Ave.

Straight alignment with S-curve at north end. 2-way left turn lane both N/S & E/W. Raised median on approach to Cantu-Galleano Ranch Rd.

Comments:

The segment collision rate is 2.57 times the statewide rate, allowing the collision rate to be used to reduce the speed limit by 5 mph with Option 1, however, not relevant in this case. Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2).

Appendix C
266
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: South City Limit & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 20
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Yes, 10 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,287
3,295

0.62 3NB, 2-1SB w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
52 mph
44-53 mph
50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.24, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway Geometrics:

Road narrowing in the southbound direction south of Schleisman Road Comments:
trucks present, vertical curve and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail / Recreation
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
267
Location: Hamner Avenue
Between: Schleisman Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 21
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.41
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
18,890
5,275

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised & Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
6 0.29, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bike Lanes. Painted Median from Riverboat to 65th. Raised Median between 65th Street and Limonite Avenue. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
high collision rate, trucks present and ped/bike safety Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
268
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 10/28/2025
Between: Segment No.: 22
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
1/16/2026
Jennifer Rosales, TE, PTOE TR 2761 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Provides continuity with segments to the north and south.

Retail & Residential
39-48 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
7 0.49

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No Parking allowed. Class 2 bike lanes
Roadway Geometrics:
3 lanes in each direction with raised median. Class 2 bike lane in both directions.Straight alignment.

Comments:

Ped/bike safety. Residences do not front onto Limonite Avenue - no direct access. 49 Hamner Avenue
Limonite Ave to Bellegrave Ave
Northt/South
Traffic Data
24,070
4,640

0.88 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
269
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 23
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, decrease 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2. Matches segments to the south.

Commercial, Residential and Industrial
38 - 47 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, truck route, pedestrian activity on NB sidewalk, no bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:
5-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Residences do not front onto Hamner Avenue - no direct access. 48 Hamner Avenue
Bellegrave Ave & Cantu-Calleano Ranch Rd
North/South
Traffic Data
25,139
4,400

0.83 3 Lanes NB (EV), 2 Lanes SB (ONT) w/Raised Median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
270
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Hamner Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road & Riverside Drive
Direction of Travel: North/South
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 17,500
Length of Segment (feet): 6,500
Length of Segment (miles): 1.23
Lane Configuration: 2 Lanes NB, 1 Lane SB w/2-way LT Lane Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 55 mph
10 mph Pace: 46-55 mph
Posted Speed Limit: Not Posted
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 5
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.32
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lane NB, heavy truck traffic at times Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment.

Comments:

Adjacent Land Use: Industrial & undeveloped
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph (not currently posted)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
�
�� 1-�1 ,6-1- ..., l IV I ?.,(:JI t:; ;!
J} Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by lnteiwest Consulting Group 0, <>11""7 Segment #24 Appendix C
271
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 10/28/2025
Between: Segment No.: 25
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
1/16/2026
Jennifer Rosales, TE, PTOE TR 2761 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Hamner Ave
Riverside Dr to Philadelphia St
North/South
Traffic Data
19,750
5,512

1.04 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Light Industrial & Commercial
40-49 mph
50 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes, Heavy truck traffic at times.

Roadway Geometrics:
3 lanes in each direction w/raised median narrowing to 2 lanes each direction within the Caltrans R/W of SR-60.

SB lanes (in Ontario) widen to 4 lanes between SR-60 and Riverside Dr. No sidewalk on westside between Philadelphia St and Greystone Dr. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety. At freeway interchange.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 Yes, reduced by 5 mph
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2). Provides continuity with segments to the south.
272
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Schleisman Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 26
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
5,333
5,266

1.00 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
50 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Moderately heavy traffic midday.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:
ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 50 mph down to 45 mph, due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
273
Location: Harrison Avenue
Between: Schleism an Road & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.:
27 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.93 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 5
0 mph, then reduced 5 mph due to trucks and ped/bike safety) Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
8,461
7,080

1.34 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
47 mph
38-47 mph
45 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Road ends 500 ft n/o Blossom. Rosa Parks Elementary, Ramirez Intermediate, Eastvale Community Center.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
274
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 28
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 Yes, decrease 10 mph.
85th percentile speed, Option 1 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2)
Residential
30 - 39 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sidewalks, crosswalks. No bike lanes. On-street parking allowed on both sides except between Montana Way and Limonite Ave on the west side. Pocket park at north end.

Roadway Geometrics:
2-Lane Undivided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Qualifies for additional 5 mph reduction since it meets conditions for CVC 22358.7(a)(2), as shown in CA MUTCD Table 2B-106(CA), with Presence of Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure (sidewalk, crosswalk & nearby signalized intersection on 4-way intersection). Residences do not front onto Harrison Avenue - no direct access. 40 Harrison Ave
Limonite Avenue & Blossom Way
North/South
Traffic Data
3,015
1,100

0.21 1 Lane in Each Direction
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
275
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: River Road & Chandler Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 29
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

1.32 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,324
5,100

0.97 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
56 mph
47-56 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 20210
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Roadway not fully improved without shoulders or curb and gutter. 1WB/1EB lanes. Roadway easily drives 60 mph.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
276
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Chandler Street & Limonite Avenue
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 30
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.93 Adjacent Land Use:

Recomm
ended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomm
endation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
10,594
8,120

1.54 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
55 mph
46-55 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
3 0.27, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Mixed with residential improvements and lack of fully improved street sections. 1SB/1NB n/o Chandler to Outback. 1SB/2NB n/o Outback to Schleisman.

Roadway Geometrics:

Co
mments:
trucks present
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 55 mph down to 50 mph, due to trucks present) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
277
Location: Hellman Avenue
Between: Limonite Avenue & North City Limit
Survey Date: April 21, 2021
Segment No.:
31 Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segm
ent (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

0.91 Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recom
mendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,317
1,070

0.20 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Raised Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
33-42 mph
N/A
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes, heavy truck traffic, industrial buildings on west side, industrial building and vacant land, under development, on east side.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comments:

Heavy truck traffic
Industrial
35 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5 m
ph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to heavy truck traffic and pedestrian/bicycle safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
278
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 32
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1 - Pedestrian & bicyclist safety Industrial
44 - 53 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
1 0.08

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. Curved alignment.

Comments:

This is a new street segment that was not previously studied. 52 Limonite Avenue
Hellman Avenue & Cucamonga Creek Channel
East/West
Traffic Data
14,735
6,100

1.16 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Appendix C
279
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/20/2025
Between: Segment No.: 33
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
52 Limonite Avenue
Cucamonga Creek Channel & Archibald Avenue
East/West
Traffic Data
15,549
2,950

0.56 2 Lanes Each Direction w/raised median
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Commercial / Residential
42 - 51 mph
None
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.17 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, no bike lanes. American Heroes Park
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided. 2-Lane Roundabout midway. Curved alignment.

Comments:

This is a new street segment that was not previously studied.

Speed Limit Recommendation
50 Establishing speed limit
85th percentile speed, Option 1 - Pedestrian & bicyclist safety Appendix C
280
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Limonite Avenue Survey Date: June 5, 2018
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Direction of Travel: East/West
Traffic Data
Average Daily Traffic: 22,300
Length of Segment (feet): 5,300
Length of Segment (miles): 1.00
Lane Configuration: 2 or 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted or Raised Median Street Classification: Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
85th Percentile: 53mph
10 mph Pace: 45-54 mph
Posted Speed Limit: 45mph
Collision History
Date Range: January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2017
Total Collisions: 8
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM): 0.49
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, sections without curb & gutter, no bike lanes, pedestrian activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight alignment. 2 EB/WB Lanes East of Archibald
Comments:

Nearby schools and parks accessed using Limonite.

Adjacent Land Use: Residential & undeveloped land
Recommendation 50 mph
Speed Limit Change: Yes
Revised Speed Limit: 50 mph
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

C
;i,-
1Y
H!lt:t s
"-t.t,-...VV1P1-. 7/fot2at't3 �I Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 165 0 Date (, • Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group or Segment# Appendix C
281
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 35
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
10/24/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
49 Limonite Avenue
Sumner Avenue & East City Limit
East/West
Traffic Data
38,582
8,100

1.53 6-Lane Divided
Urban Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Retail & Residential
40-49 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
12 0.28

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Segments of missing sidewalk, heavy pedestrian usage around transit, fast food & crossing major streets. No Parking allowed.

Roadway Geometrics:
2 or 3 lanes in each direction with painted or raised median. Bike lanes in certain EB sections, Class 2 or 4. For the purposes of the E&TS, use 6-Lane Divided. Straight alignment.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety. Residences do not front onto Limonite Avenue - no direct access.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2.

Appendix C
282
Location: Mission Boulevard
Between: S Milliken Avenue & Ontario Freeway (I-15)
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 36
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.86
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
January 1, 2018 - December 31, 2020
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes nor sidewalks. 55 mph EB sign east and 55mph WB sign west of City Limits. Currently posted as 60mph east of S Milliken.

Roadway Geometrics:

Horizontal Curve between S Milliken Ave and Cornerstone Drive.

Comme
nts:
trucks present
Commercial
55 mph
Establishing Speed Limit
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 60 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
19,234
2,620

0.50 2 Lanes Each Direction w/2 Lanes on vertical curve to Milliken Arterial
Speed Survey Data
59 mph
49-58 mph
N/A
12/20/2021
Appendix C
283
Location: Orange Street
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 37
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.6
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,027
2,630

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
45 mph
36-45 mph
30 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Student/Pedestrian Activity. Eastvale Elementary to the north & River Heights Intermediate to the south. Reduction of speed due to crash history.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Residential
30 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. New section added to CVC by SB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to high collision rate, on-street parking, and ped/bike safety Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
284
Location: Prairie Smoke Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Whitewall Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 38
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
1,129
1,380

0.26 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
42 mph
31-40 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Whitewall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
residential density and ped/bike safety
Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 40 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to residential density and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
285
Location: River Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: September 14, 2021
Segment No.: 39
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,806
3,970

0.75 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Collector
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
41-50 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.31, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Local business generate large vehicle traffic. Single Lane Each Direction from Hellman to Hall. 2 Lanes Each Direction from Hall to Archibald.

Agricultural land west of Hall.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Agricultural
40 mph
No
CVC Section 22358.8, which allows retaining the existing speed limit under certain conditions, which are met. Created by new AB 43, effective 1/1/2022. 85th percentile speed considered too high due to trucks present and ped/bike safety.

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
286
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 10/28/2025
Between: Segment No.: 7A
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
1/16/2026
Jennifer Rosales, TE, PTOE TR 2761 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
60 River Road
Bluff St to River Rd/Kendra Ln
North/South
Traffic Data
24,689
4,340

0.82 4-Lane Divided and 4-Lane Undivided
Major Arterial
Speed Survey Data
Residential & Undeveloped
51-60 mph
55 (Not Currently Posted)
Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.20

1.06 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No parking, Class 2 bike lanes,
Roadway Geometrics:
4-Lane Divided with bike lanes. Undivided from northside of Santa Ana River bridge to Bluff St. No sidewalk on majority of westside. Curved alignment.

Comments:

Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
55 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7(a)(2).
287
Location: Riverboat Drive
Between: Massy Harris Way & Wells Springs Street
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 40
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
735
3,500

0.66 Single Lane Each Direction
Collector
Speed Survey Data
44 mph
35-44 mph
40 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Pedestrians present. 1EB/1WB lane. Turnaround area w/o Massy Harris.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
on-street parking and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
40 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
288
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 5/23/2025
Between: Segment No.: 41
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
10/24/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
48 Riverside Drive
Hamner Avenue & East City Limit
East/West
Traffic Data
20,231
2,300

0.44 4-Lane Undivided
Secondary Collector
Speed Survey Data
Industrial & Undeveloped Land
36-45 mph
45 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
3 0.46

1.33 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Sections of missing sidewalk, posted No Parking except where parking is allowed for large trucks on the north side in the dirt shoulder, heavy truck use, no bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Varies 1 to 2 lanes for both directions, with both painted medians and 2-way left turn lanes. Alignment varies with straight sections, but mostly curved.

Comments:

Large trucks present. Ped/bike safety.

Speed Limit Recommendation
45 No
85th percentile speed, Option 2.

Appendix C
289
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Hellman Avenue & Archibald Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 42
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.98
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
34,671
5,300

1.00 3 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
57 mph
49-58 mph
50 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
15 0.13, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3 Lanes Each Direction between Hellman and e/o Aldergate Rd/Whitewell Rd. 3WB/2EB e/o Aldergate/Whitewell w/o Gypsum Creek, 2WB/2EB w/o Gypsum Creek and w/o Kenton Pl. 2WB/3EB w/o Kenton to Archibald.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
50 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 55 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
290
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Archibald Avenue & Sumner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 43
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
14,855
5,238

0.99 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted and Raised Medians Arterial
Speed Survey Data
49 mph
40-49 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.12, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
3EB/3WB between Archibald and Moonflower, 2EB/3WB between Moonflower and Harrison, 2EB/2WB between Harrison and Cedar Creek Rd, 1EB/2WB between Cedar Creek and Sumner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
291
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Sumner Avenue & Scholar Way
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 44
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 0
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.32
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Undeveloped land to the south
Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present
Residential / Undeveloped
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph)
Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,737
2,650

0.50 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
48 mph
39-48 mph
45 mph
12/20/2021
Appendix C
292
Location: Schleisman Road
Between: Scholar Way & Ham ner Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 45
Direction of Travel: East/West
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,682
3,040

0.58 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Arterial
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
42-51 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Curved roadway, location of church. 2 Lane Each Direction between Scholar and Raymond. 1EB/2WB between Raymond and Hamner.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due to trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
293
Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary
Location: Survey Date: 3/19/2025
Between: Segment No.: 46
Direction of Travel:

Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (miles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification: Secondary Collector
85th Percentile Speed (mph):
10mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit (mph):

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (crashes / MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate:

Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed Limit:

Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation Based On:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer*:
5/7/2025
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
* Contract services provided by Ardurra, Inc.
43 Scholar Way
Citrus Street & Schleisman Road
North/South
Traffic Data
6,389
3,300

0.63 2 Lanes in Each Direction with 2-Way Left Turn Lane, partial painted median Speed Survey Data
School / Residential
34 - 43 mph
35 Collision History
January 1, 2023 - December 31, 2024
0 0.00

1.24 Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Very heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity on sidewalks. No parking. No bike lanes, painted shoulders between Orange and Baltimore.

Comments:

High School, intermediate school, elementary school, & public library adjacent to street. Congestion. Meets criteria for CVC 22358.7, in accordance with CA MUTCD Table 2B-106(CA).

Residences do not front onto Scholar Way - no direct access.

Roadway Geometrics:

Primarily 4-Lane Undivided, with Divided section between Citrus St. & Mustang Way. Roadway narrows between Schleisman and Orange.

Speed Limit Recommendation
35 No Change
85th percentile speed, Option 2 & CVC 22358.7.

Appendix C
294
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Schleisman Road & Lim onite Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 47
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.91
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,721
5,250

0.99 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
35-44 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. 2SB/1NB between Limonite to Peach Blossom. Heavy pedestrian/student/bicyclist activity. Harada Park & Harada Elementary School.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
40 mph
Yes, 5 mph increase
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5 mph)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
295
Location: Scholar Way
Between: Limonite Avenue & Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: July 29, 2021
Segment No.: 48
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recom
mended Speed: 40 mph
Speed Limit Change:

Recommendation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
6,678
3,700

0.70 Single Lane Each Direction w/Painted Median
Secondary
Speed Survey Data
43 mph
34-43 mph
N/A

0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes. Sidewalk only on west side of roadway. Armadillos and delineators between 58th St and Bellegrave Ave. Empty lot to east and residential to the west between 58th St and Limonite Ave. Residential on both sides north of 58th St.

Roadway Geometrics:

Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer• :

Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Comments:

On-street parking, residential density, and ped/bike
safety
Residential
85th percentile speed, Option 2
(rounded up to 45 mph, then reduced 5
mph)
Establishing Speed Limit
Recommendation
12/20/2021
Appendix C
296
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: Citrus Street & 65th Street
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 49
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
4,028
5,935

1.12 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
43-52 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
0 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

Bicycle Lanes, with bicyclists present. 1SB/2NB between Citrus and Cool Meadow, 2SB/2NB between Cool Meadow and Pheasant Knoll, 1SB/1NB Pheasant Knoll and Schleisman, 1SB/2NB between Schleisman and Starflower, 2SB/2NB between Starflower and 65th.

Roadway Geometrics:

Roadway narrow between Schleisman and Orange.

C
omments:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
297
Location: Sumner Avenue
Between: 65th Street and Bellegrave Avenue
Survey Date: February 17, 2021
Segment No.: 50
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions: 1
Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 0.93
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Limit Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
7,857
5,422

1.03 2 Lanes Each Direction w/Painted Median
Major
Speed Survey Data
51 mph
41-50 mph
45 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021

0.11, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:
bike lanes, with pedestrians and bikes present. Orchard Park. Pedestrian/Bicyclist Activity.

Roadway Geometrics:

Comme
nts:
trucks present and ped/bike safety
Residential / Commercial Retail
45 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(rounded down to 50 mph, then reduced another 5mph due trucks present and ped/bike safety) Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
298
Location: Whitewall Road
Between: Schleisma n Road & Prairie Smoke Road
Survey Date: February 18, 2021
Segment No.: 51
Direction of Travel: North/South
Average Daily Traffic:

Length of Segment (feet):

Length of Segment (m
iles):

Lane Configuration:

Street Classification:
85th Percentile:
10 mph Pace:

Posted Speed Limit:

Date Range:

Total Collisions:

Collision Rate (Accidents/MVM):

Statewide Collision Rate: 1.60
Adjacent Land Use:

Recommended Speed:

Speed Lim
it Change:

Recomme
ndation based on:
* Contract services provided by lnterwest Consulting Group Collision History
City of Eastvale
Engineering & Traffic Survey Summary
Traffic Data
2,056
1,542

0.29 Single Lane Each Direction
Local
Speed Survey Data
40 mph
29-38 mph
35 mph
Ruth Smith, TE, PTP TE 1650 Date
Recommendation
July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2021
2 0.00, less than statewide collision rate
Conditions Not Readily Apparent
Conditions:

No bike lanes.

Roadway Geometrics:

Straight Alignment. Jog in the roadway near Prairie Sm oke Road. Single Lane Each Direction w/ no centerline or edgelines. Residential Single Lane Collector.

Comments:
high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety Residential
35 mph
No
85th percentile speed, Option 1
(reduced by 5mph from 40 mph down to 35 mph, due to high collision rate, residential density, and ped/bike safety)
Approved and Authorized for release by City Traffic Engineer•:
12/20/2021
Appendix C
299
Appendix C
300

APPENDIX D
Strip Maps
(Updated January 2026)

301

302

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
58TH STREET

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVE

0.49 mi

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
58TH STREET

UNDEVELOPED
NOT TO SCALE North

SCHOLAR WAY

JAMESTOWN AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
303
Appendix D
304
Appendix D
305

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):
65TH STREET

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING ST (NCL)

0.31 mi

RESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North
35 MPH •

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
• 35 MPH

Appendix D
306

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

SUMNER AVENUE

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
68TH STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
Appendix D
307

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI)
68TH STREET

0.5 mi

RESIDENTIAL
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

WELLS SPRING ST
I-15 INTERSTATE HWY

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITS
45 MPH •

WELLS SPRING STREET
(ECL)

HAMNER AVENUE TO WELLS SPRING STREET (ECL)
Appendix D
308
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):Archibald AvenueRiver Rd/Kendra Ln to Wind River Rd/Grapewin St0.62 mi NOT TO SCALENorth

ARCHIBALD AVENUERIVER ROAD

WIND RIVER ROADCHURCH/SCHOOLRESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPHGRAPEWIN STREET

KENDRA LANE

EQUESTRIANCENTER
RESIDENTIAL50 MPH •
309

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.63 mi
NOT TO SCALE North SCHLEISMAN ROAD
WIND

RIVER RD

GRAPEWIN
STREET

CHANDLER STREET

FIELDMASTER
STREET

SMITH RIVER
ROAD
SLATE
CREEK

EASTVALEPKWY
AVENUE
ROAD
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
50 MPH •
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
310

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

1.14 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

INDUSTRIAL

ARCHI BALD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
AVENUE
65TH STREET

LIMONITE AVENUE

N BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
(NCL)
Appendix D
311
50 MPH Appendix D
312
Appendix D
313

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE TO EAST CITY LIMIT

0.49 mi
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL
I-15
50 MPH •

BELLEGRAVE AVENUECITY LIMIT

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL

INTERSTATE HWY

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
314

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

BLOSSOM WAY

HARRISON AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.5 mi

BLOSSOM WAY
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CEDAR CREEK ROAD
30 MPH •
• 30 MPH

REDSIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
30 MPH •

PINE GROVE PL
Appendix D
315

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North
CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH RD.

HAMNER AVENUE TO I-15 FREEWAY

0.44 mi

CANTU-GALLEANO
RANCH
RD.

COMMERCIAL
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
&IT< LIMIT(I-15)
HAMN(R A9(NU(
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
GOODMAN RD.
&IT< LIMIT
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
&IT< 2) 2NTARI2
&IT< 2) -URUPA 9ALL(<
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
Appendix D
316

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

RESIDENTIAL

CHANDLER STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

HELLMAN AVENUE TO HARRISON AVENUE

1.53 mi

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

SELBY AVENUE

SHOREHAM
STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

CITY LIMIT

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
317

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HARRISON AVENUE

SUMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
HARRISON AVENUE TO SCHOLAR :AY
0

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
• MPH
SCHOOL =ONE

• 40 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

HIGH SCHOOL
PARK
• 40 MPH

COUNTRY FAIR DRIVE

COBBLE CREEK DRIVE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
318

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CITRUS STREET
NOT TO SCALE North

HAMNER AVENUE

CITRUS STREET
SC+OLAR :AY TO +AMNER A9ENUE
PL
ವ MP+

SCHOLAR WAY
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)
ವ MP+

HIGH SCHOOL

RESIDENTIAL
PARK

CARROLLTON PLACE

MAYFIELD STREET
Appendix D
319

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NOT TO SCALE North

FIELDMASTER STREET

HALL ROAD TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
.99 mi

RESIDENTIAL

FIELDMASTER
STREET
40 MPH •
• 25 MPH
• 40 MPH
• 40 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
(SCHOOL ZONE)
CR
E
EK

C
H
E
R
R
Y

MEADOW
BROOK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PARK

HALL RD

ARCHIBALD AVE
Appendix D
320

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Goodman Way
Street Segment: Cantu-Galleano Ranch Road to Hamner Avenue Segment Length (MI): 0.68 mi
North

GOODMAN WAY

RESIDENTIAL

NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

COMMERCIAL/

INDUSTRIAL
• 35 MPH
35 MPH•
35 MPH• • 35 MPH
Appendix D
321

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
.62 mi

CITRUS STREET

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITS

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
45 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH

FAIR GROUNDS

RESIDENTIALPARK
Appendix D
322

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVERBOAT ROAD

HAMNER AVENUE

HAMNER AVENUE
1 mi

LIMONITE AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE
68TH STREET

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL

OAKDALE STREET
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIALRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL
65TH STREET
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
• 35 MPH
Appendix D
323
324
Appendix D
325

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP

Street Name: HAMNER AVENUE
Street Segment: CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD & RIVERSIDE DRIVE Segment Length (MI): 1.23 mi
North NOT TO SCALE

HAMNER AVENUE

CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH ROAD

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

INDUSTRIAL

CITY OF ONTARIO

CITY OF EASTVALE
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

Appendix D
326
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):Hamner AvenueRiverside Drive to Philadelphia Street1.04 mi NOT TO SCALENorth
PHILADELPHIA STREETINDUSTRIAL• 45 MPHRIVERSIDE DRIVE

CITY OF ONTARIO
45 MPH •STATE ROUTE 60COMMERCIALINDUSTRIALINDUSTRIALCITY OF EASTVALE • 45 MPH
45 MPH •HAMNER AVENUE
327

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

CHANDLER STREET
North

HARRISON AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET TO SCHLEISMAN ROAD
1 mi
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
CITRUS STREET • 45 MPH

NOT TO SCALE
45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
328
Appendix D
329
Appendix D
330

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD TO

0.97 mi

CONSERVATION
AREA

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

CHANDLER STREET

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

AGRICULTURE
• 30 MPH
(W1-1)50 MPH •

UNDEVELOPED

CHANDLER STREET
Appendix D
331

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

HELLMAN AVENUE

NOT TO SCALE

CITY LIMITHELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

UNDEVELOPED
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
50 MPH •
SCHOOL

WALTERS STREET

ALDERGATE
ROAD
MARKET
STREET

PINE AVENUE

PRAIRIE SMOKE
ROAD

LANDERWOOD DRIVE

BICKMORE AVENUE

1.54 mi

CHANDLER STREET TO LIMONITE AVENUE
AVENUE

LIMONITE AVE
PARK

INDUSTRIAL
ks
STREET
50 MPH •
VELO
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED

RESIDENTIAL

INDUSTRIAL

KIMBALL AVENUE

CHINO CORONA ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
332

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

NorthNOT TO SCALE

HELLMAN AVENUE

LIMONITE AVENUE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT

0.20 mi

HELLMAN AVENUE

CHANDLER STREET

INDUSTRIAL

LIMONITE AVE

INDUSTRIAL

SUMMIT DR

INDUSTRIAL

HELLMAN AVENU

CITY LIMIT

ENTERPRISE WAY (PRIVATE)

1.54 mi

KIMBALL AVENUE

CITY LIMIT

INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
333
Appendix D
334
Appendix D
335

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Archibald Avenue to Sumner Avenue
Segment Length (MI): 1 mi
North

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL

ONTARIO RANCH ROAD

NOT TO SCALE

SUMNER AVENUE
HARRISON AVENUE • 50 MPH
• 50 MPH
• 50 MPH

RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL UNDEVELOPED

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

UNDEVELOPED
Appendix D
336

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Limonite Avenue
Street Segment: Sumner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 1.53 mi
North

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

SCHOLAR WAY

HAMNER AVENUE
• 45 MPH

LIMONITE
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

COMMERCIAL
SUMNER AVENUE • 45 MPH
I-15 FWY

COMMERCIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

UNDEVELOPED
RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL
Appendix D
337

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

MISSION BLVD
S MILLIKEN AVENUE TO ONTARIO FREEWAY (I-15)

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

MISSION BLVD
. MILLILKEN AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
North
CITY LIMITS(I-15)
55 MPH •
Appendix D
338

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

ORANGE STREET

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SCHOOL

ORANGE STREET
30 MPH •

SUMNER AVENUE
• 30 MPH

SCHOLAR WAY
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)

RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLAGRICULTURE

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
339

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO WHITEWELL ROAD

0.26 mi

NOT TO SCALE

RESIDENTIAL

PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

WHITEWELL ROAD
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
340

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

RIVER ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE

0.75 mi

NOT TO SCALE

ARCHIBALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

CITY LIMITSHELLMAN AVENUE

RIVER ROAD

HALL ROAD

AGRICULTURE

AGRICULTURE
40 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL
Appendix D
341
CITY OF EASTVALEDepartment of Public WorksSTRIP MAPStreet Name:Street Segment:Segment Length (MI):River RdBluff St to River Rd/Kendra Ln0.82 mi NOT TO SCALENorth

RIVER ROADRIVER ROAD

BLUFF STREETKENDRA LANERESIDENTIALUNDEVELOPEDUNDEVELOPEDRESIDENTIAL • 55 MPH
•55 MPH
342
Appendix D
343

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name: Riverside Drive
Street Segment: Hamner Avenue to East City Limit
Segment Length (MI): 0.44 mi
North

NOT TO SCALE

RIVERSIDE DRIVE

HAMNER AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
I-15 FWY
• 45 MPH

MILLIKEN AVENUE

INDUSTRIAL
Appendix D
344

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE
1 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

HELLMAN AVENUE

ARCHI BALD AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 50 MPH

CITY LIMIT
50 MPH •
50 MPH •

COMMERCIAL
Appendix D
345

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO SUMNER AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

ARCHIBALD
SUMNER

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

HARRISON
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL

COMMUNITY
CENTER
AVENUE
AVENUE
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
346

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SUMNER AVENUE TO SCHOLAR WAY

0.5 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
SUMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL

UNDEVELOPED
AVENUE
WAY
UNDEVELOPED45 MPH •
Appendix D
347

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

SCHOLAR WAY TO HAMNER AVENUE

0.58 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHLEISMAN

HAMMNER

SCHOLAR

RESIDENTIAL
AVENUE
WAY
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL
45 MPH •
Appendix D
348
Appendix D
349

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

SCHOLAR WAY

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO LIMONITE AVENUE

0.99 mi

NOT TO SCALE

SCHOLAR

SCHLEISMAN ROAD

LIMONITE AVE
• 25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE)WAY

RESIDENTIAL
SCHOOL
PUBLIC
PARK

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
North
25 MPH(SCHOOL ZONE) •
35 MPH •
35 MPH •
• 35 MPH
• 35 MPH
35 MPH •
Appendix D
350
Appendix D
351

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
CITRUS STREET TO 65th STREET

1.12 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER

CITRUS STREET
65th STREET
AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
• 45 MPH
• 45 MPH

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH
45 MPH •
45 MPH •
Appendix D
352

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

SUMNER AVENUE
65th STREET TO BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

1.03 mi

NOT TO SCALE
SUMNER
65TH STREET
AVENUE45 MPH •

RESIDENTIAL

LIMONITE AVENUE

RESIDENTIAL
• 45 MPH

ORCHARD
PARK

SHOPPING
CENTER
• 45 MPH

BELLEGRAVE AVENUE

CITY LIMIT
Appendix D
353

CITY OF EASTVALE
Department of Public Works

STRIP MAP
Street Name:

Street Segment:

Segment Length (MI):

North

WHITEWELL ROAD

SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO PRAIRIE SMOKE ROAD

0.29 mi

NOT TO SCALE

WHITEWELL

SCHLEISMAN ROAD
ROAD

RESIDENTIAL

RESIDENTIAL
• 35 MPH

PRAIRIE

SMOKE RD
Appendix D
354
Appendix D
355

APPENDIX E
Speed Survey Data Sheets
(Updated October 2025)

356

357
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 58th Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Scholar Way - Hamner Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:00
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:05
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
37 7 3 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 C
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 2 6 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 0 4 31 X X X X 4 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 0% 18% 15%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 72% 72%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 10% 13%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/29/21
Appendix E
358
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Archibald Avenue - Sumner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 10:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 4 1 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 5 1 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 1 8 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 7 2 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 6% 8% 9%
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 80% 78% 73%
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4
36 0 6 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 14% 14% 18%
35 0 3 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 40 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
3/19/25
Appendix E
359
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 65th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:30
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 4 2 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 5 5 47 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 0 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 5 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 10% 2% 8%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 1 38 X X 2 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7
36 1 1 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 16%
35 0 2 35 X X 2
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
7/22/21
Appendix E
360
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Hamner Avenue - East City Limits
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:00
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:20
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 5 46 X X X X X X X X 8 *
45 7 3 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 6 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 12% 8% 14%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix E
361
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: 68th Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sumner Avenue - Hamner Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 3 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 4 1 50 X X X X X 5 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 7 2 46 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 4 3 44 X X X X X X X 7 A
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 C
42 5 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 15%
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 70% 72%
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 4% 16% 13%
35 1 0 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
2/11/21
Appendix E
362
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Bluff Street - Wind River Road / Grapewin Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1
57 1 0 57 X 1 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 1 1 55 X X 2
54 3 2 54 X X X X X 5 Time
53 4 1 53 X X X X X 5 From: 9:45
52 5 2 52 X X X X X X X 7
51 2 2 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 0 3 50 X X X 3 To: 10:10
49 5 3 49 X X X X X X X X 8 *
48 2 3 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 1 5 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 55 MPH
46 2 0 46 X X 2 P
45 4 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 C
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 E
42 4 2 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 34% 18% 29%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 58% 64% 60%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 0 1 36 X 1 % Under Pace: 8% 18% 11%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49MPH 41 - 50MPH 40 - 49MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed:41 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed:46 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed:53 MPH 51 MPH 52 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS100

Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Eastvale
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
5/23/25
363
MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Archibald Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Schleisman Road - Bellegrave Avenue / North City Limits 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 1 3 59 X X X X 4
58 4 0 58 X X X X 4
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Date:
56 0 1 56 X 1
55 5 2 55 X X X X X X X 7 *
54 2 5 54 X X X X X X X 7 * Time
53 4 2 53 X X X X X X 6 * From: 11:05
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 P
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 A Time
50 5 3 50 X X X X X X X X 8 C To: 11:30
49 4 6 49 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
48 5 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Existing
47 4 4 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 50 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 6 1 45 X X X X X X X 7
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 0 41 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
40 0 0 40 0 % Over Pace: 20% 12% 11%
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 % In Pace: 74% 80% 76%
37 0 0 37 0
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 6% 8% 13%
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 49 MPH 50 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 55 MPH 55 MPH 55 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100

Eastvale City CouncilFebruary 25, 2026

Eastvale City Council
February 25, 2026