CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING AUTHORITY AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE EL CAJON
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Council Chamber
200 Civic Center Way
El Cajon, CA 92020
Agenda
AUGUST 9, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
Bill Wells, Mayor Graham Mitchell, City Manager
Michelle Metschel, Deputy Mayor Vince DiMaggio, Assistant City Manager Steve Goble, Councilmember Morgan Foley, City Attorney
Gary Kendrick, Councilmember Angela Cortez, City Clerk
Phil Ortiz, Councilmember
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Bill Wells
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Angela Cortez
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
AGENDA CHANGES:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
At this time, any person may address a matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council/Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the El Cajon Redevelopment Agency that is not on the Agenda. Comments relating to items on today’s docket are to be taken at the time the item is heard. State law prohibits discussion or action on items not on the Agenda; however, Council, Authority and Agency Members may briefly respond to statements or questions. An item may be placed on a future Agenda. ~ Valley of opportunity
~ ~ <'o .,.o,
"'Porate~
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
100. Planned Unit Development and Tentative Parcel Map for the Naranca 3-Unit Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Opens the Public Hearing and receives testimony;1.
Closes the Public Hearing;2.
Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving the CEQA Exemption;3.
Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving Planned Unit Development No. 2020-0001, subject to conditions; and
4. Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2021-0002, subject to conditions.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
101. El Cajon Public Safety and Essential Services Measure
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Adopts the next Resolution, in order, authorizing the placement of a one-cent sales tax measure on the November 8, 2022 ballot.
1. Conducts first reading, by title only, of an Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 4919 and imposing a transactions and use tax to be administered by the State Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
2. Adopts the next Resolution, in order, establishing the City Council's priorities for expending any new sales tax funds generated from the measure, if approved.
3. Allocates up to $150,000 in General Reserves for information sharing efforts.4.
ADJOURNMENT: The Adjourned Regular Joint Meeting of the El Cajon City Council/ El Cajon Housing Authority/Successor Agency to the El Cajon Redevelopment Agency held this 9th day of August 2022, is adjourned to Tuesday, September 13, 2022, at 3:00 p.m.
City Council
Agenda Report
Agenda Item 100.
DATE: 08/09/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Noah Alvey, Deputy Director of Community Development SUBJECT: Planned Unit Development and Tentative Parcel Map for the Naranca 3-Unit Development
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
Opens the Public Hearing and receives testimony;1.
Closes the Public Hearing;2.
Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving the CEQA Exemption;3.
Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving Planned Unit Development No. 2020-0001, subject to conditions; and
4. Moves to adopt the next Resolution, in order, approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2021-0002, subject to conditions.
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project proposes a common interest development of three single-family detached residences intended for home ownership on a .43-acre site, currently vacant, and addressed as 1325 Naranca Avenue. In addition to the proposed residences, the project includes a four-lot subdivision with three residential parcels and one common parcel including a private driveway and parking, landscaping, and other public and private improvements. The El Cajon Municipal Code requires the City Council to approve, conditionally approve or deny planned unit developments.
BACKGROUND:
General Plan: Low Density Residential (LR)
Specific Plan: None
Zone: Residential, Multi-family, 6,000 sq. ft. (RM-6000) Other City Plan(s): N/A
Regional and State Plan(s): N/A
Notable State Law(s): Subdivision Map Act
Applicant: Rabie Mikha; [email protected]; 619-729-5953 Project Site & Constraints
The subject property is 18,808 square feet (.43 acres) and located on the south side of Naranca Avenue between North Second and Grape Streets. Recently, a dilapidated single-family dwelling and detached accessory structure were demolished at the site.
The property includes a sizable easement for Forester Creek, represented as a hatched line on project plans. Project plans also display the 1% Annual Flood Hazard area according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The base flood elevation at this location is 482 feet and project plans show building pads above base flood elevation (486 and 487 feet).
Surrounding Context
The properties surrounding the project site are developed and zoned as follows:
Direction Zones Land Uses
North RM-6000 Mixed residential
South Interstate 8 Interstate freeway
East RM-6000 Mixed Residential
West C-G Single-family residences
General Plan
The subject property is designated Low Density Residential ("LR") on the General Plan Land Use Map. The LR designation is intended for residential density between three to ten dwelling units per acre.
Goal 5 of the General Plan calls for a broad range of housing types to be made available to meet the housing needs of various age and income groups. The Housing Element identifies the need to accommodate residential units at all income levels. The proposed project will include market rate for sale of housing units that will contribute to meeting the goal of fulfilling regional housing needs. The subject site is not listed in the Housing Element site inventory.
Municipal Code
The subject property is within the RM-6000 (Residential, Multi-family, 6,000 square foot) zone, which is consistent with the LR General Plan designation. This allows for one single-family residence per 6,000 square feet of lot area; the RM-6000 zone also requires detached units.
The Planned Unit Development ("PUD") ordinance allows for comprehensively planned development and provides flexibility in order to encourage imaginative design and planning.
Specific development standards apply to PUD developments and include parking, recreation and landscaped areas, building construction, utility systems, trash collection and Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions ("CC&Rs").
Subdivision Ordinance/ Subdivision Map Act
A tentative parcel map is proposed to create real property. The four-lot subdivision proposes one common lot and three residential lots. The authority and procedures for the processing of a tentative parcel map are found in the California Subdivision Map Act, and the City of El Cajon Subdivision Ordinance (Title 16 of the El Cajon Municipal Code).
Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance
El Cajon Municipal Code Chapter 15.14 provides standards to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas. In areas within Zone X, and where base flood elevation is known, new residential developments are required to either: 1) construct the first floor one foot above base flood elevation and provide certification by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, verified by the building inspector, or 2) utilize construction methods and design which would equalize hydrostatic flood forced (openings in the foundation system). In this case, building pads are shown above base flood elevation and elevation certificates are required in the conditions of approval.
DISCUSSION
Land Use
The proposed project consists of three two-story, single-family, detached residences with attached two-car garages. The proposed residential project is in character with the surrounding neighborhood and will provide additional for sale housing options. The project will result in a density of approximately seven dwellings units per acre (du/acre), which is well within the density expected in the LR (3-10 du/acre) General Plan designation. There are quite a few similar PUD developments in the Bostonia area along Naranca, Marline, and Peach Avenues—all within the same RM-6000 zone and each yielding three units.
Site Design
Two of the three proposed single-family residences front on a private driveway; the third is oriented towards Naranca Avenue with a garage opening towards the private driveway. Each residence will have a two-car garage, uncovered visitor parking along the private driveway, and a private back yard. Concrete sidewalks are required to connect parking with building entrances. Due to the size of the project and the location of guest parking, staff is recommending that the proposed driveway provides access to the guest parking spaces, rather than a separate sidewalk. The findings for the PUD require that the elimination of the interior project sidewalk be approved as an alternative development standard.
Recreational open space requirements are met with private rear yards and exterior yard landscaped areas. Trash and recycling will be individual containers stored on concrete pads within the private yard areas. A common interest development—such as a PUD—requires the formation of a homeowner’s association ("HOA") with CC&Rs to ensure the maintenance of common areas. A fourth common lot will be owned and maintained by the HOA, which will be responsible for ongoing maintenance. The common lot includes the private driveway and visitor parking in the proposed development.
The individual lots range from 3,842 to 5,252 square feet; the variation is primarily due to the large easement area for Forester Creek. Side yard setbacks are approximately five feet for each unit, and rear yard setbacks are at least 14 feet. Each home shares the same design and footprint (only with a different orientation) and two-story design at a height of 20 feet. The project proposes a six-foot wood boundary fence. It is noteworthy to mention that the City Council has required more substantial fencing material such as decorative masonry, concrete panel, or vinyl. Additionally, retaining walls are shown along portions of the project boundary, not exceeding two feet in height.
The proposed project is similar to other PUDs in the vicinity. The closest of which, addressed off of Treetop Lane, is approximately 150 feet east on Naranca Avenue and also includes three single-family homes with a common lot for recreational space and a private street.
Design and Architecture
The proposed residences are consistent with new single-family and ADU projects within the City. The primary finish is stucco with large window trim features in a complementary color. Due to the height limit of 20 feet in the RM-6000 zone and the two-story product, the roofline has a very shallow pitch. In terms of color, the proposed elevations show tan and brown earth tones.
Each residence is 2,202 square feet with three bedrooms on the second story.
Development Standards
Development Standard PUD (RM-6000) Proposed Project
Lot Requirements Sub-lots determined by PUD 3,842 to 5,252 sq. ft.
Density 1 unit per 6,000 sq. ft. 1 unit per 6,269 sq.
ft.
Setbacks Front building – 20 ft.
Garage – 20 ft.
Other setbacks determined by PUD
Front Building – 20
ft.
Garage – 20 ft.
Rear – 14 ft.
Side – 5 ft.
Lot Coverage Maximum 40% - 100% of buildings and
driveways and 50% of private street
counted
33.8%
Building Height Maximum 20 ft. 20 ft.
Covered Parking 2 spaces per unit = 6 2-car garage per
unit = 6 spaces
Visitor Parking 1 space per unit = 3 3 spaces
Waste Collection Individual or Common Individual
Walls and Fencing Project boundary wall or fence 6 ft. wood fence Open Space, Recreation,
and Landscaping
1,000 sq. ft. per unit 1,025 to 1,800 sq. ft.
per unit
Streets and driveways 24 ft. wide 24 ft. wide
Lighting Lighting plan required Condition of
approval
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
On July 19, 2022, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project. One member of the public spoke regarding the item and requested clarification on the location of parking. Additionally, the project representatives spoke in favor of the project. After public testimony, the public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission discussed the item and voted 4-0-1 to adopt Resolution Nos. 11066, 11067 and 11068 recommending City Council approval of the proposed CEQA exemption, PUD-2020-0001 and TPM-2021-0002, respectively.
I I
I I
I II
I II
FINDINGS:
Planned Unit Development No. 2020-0001
The density of the proposed PUD is consistent with the General Plan.A.
The proposed project density is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation of the General Plan. Furthermore, the project would facilitate the development of the site with residential uses in conformance with Housing Element policies to increase the number of housing units.
The approval of any alternative development standards for the proposed PUD is in the public interest.
B.
The project proposal to accommodate pedestrian access along the private street as a separate concrete sidewalk is not necessary to serve the three residences. No other alternative development standards are proposed.
The proposed PUD is compatible with surrounding development.C.
The proposed PUD is similar to other common interest development projects in the vicinity and provides for home ownership opportunities. Therefore, the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development.
The location of structures, private streets, driveways, and parking spaces on the proposed PUD site plan will not result in unauthorized parking which would block or hamper vehicular movement or unnecessarily affect visibility on the private street or driveway.
D.
The design of the proposed project provides sufficient parking with adequate space for vehicle back-up and maneuvering. Proposed structures and other elements of the project would not have a negative effect on visibility.
Tentative Subdivision Map No. 2021-0002
Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act and section 16.12.080 of the ECMC state that the City shall deny approval of a parcel map if the city’s legislative body makes any of the following findings:
The proposed map is not consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
A.
The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and the General Plan goals related to housing that seek to provide a variety of residential development opportunities in the City.
The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the General Plan, and the site is not physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density.
B.
The proposed parcel map design results in a common interest residential project, which is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan. Furthermore, the site is generally level and physically suited for the type of development as well as the density of the development that is proposed for this property.
The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
C.
The project site has no habitat value and is located in an urbanized area. Furthermore, the subject property is in a disturbed condition, surrounded by urban development, not environmentally sensitive, and there are no fish or wildlife populations that would be harmed by the existing residential development of the subject property.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious health problems.
D.
The design of the subdivision and types of improvements are required to incorporate storm water management improvements that will contribute to healthier streams, rivers, bays and the ocean. Furthermore, the units are separated to allow airflow through and around the units.
The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the subdivision.
E.
The proposed map will not conflict with easements of record or easements established by court judgment, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed map, and there are no existing easements that will be affected because the map will establish new easements for public utilities, private road access, the private storm drain, and landscape maintenance.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT:
The proposed project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects). The following measuring criteria for a Class 32 exemption apply: the project is consistent with the General Plan designation; the proposal is within the city limits on a site less than five acres, surrounded by substantially urban uses; the project site has no value as natural habitat; approval would not result in significant effects related to traffic, noise, air, or water quality; and, the site can be adequately served by required utilities. Therefore, section 15332 is an appropriate exemption for this project.
PUBLIC NOTICE & INPUT:
Notice of this public hearing was mailed on July 29, 2022, to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and to anyone who requested such notice in writing, in compliance with Government Code sections 65090, 65091, and 65092, as applicable. Additionally, as a public service, the notice was posted in the kiosk at City Hall and on the City’s website under “Public Hearings/Public Notices.” The notice was also mailed to the two public libraries in the City of El Cajon, located at 201 East Douglas Avenue and 576 Garfield Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of the project. The proposed three for sale units increases home ownership in El Cajon in conformance with Housing Element policies to increase the number of housing units available to all income levels.
Prepared By: Spencer Hayes, Associate Planner
Reviewed By: Anthony Shute, Director of Community Development Approved By: Graham Mitchell, City Manager
Attachments
Notice of Public Hearing & Location Map
Proposed Resolution CEQA
Proposed Resolution PUD
Proposed Resolution TPM
Planning Commission Resolution 11066
Planning Commission Resolution 11067
Planning Commission Resolution 11068
Planning Commission Excerpt July 19, 2022 Meeting
Aerial Image
Application
Disclosure Statement
Architectural Plans and Elevations
Tentative Parcel Map