El Centro City Council
July 30, 2024

AGENDA

CITY OF EL CENTRO

CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 2024
City Hall Special Meeting 4:00 PM

CITY HALL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1275 MAIN STREET
EL CENTRO, CA 92243
City of El Centro Page 1
Notice is hereby given that the Mayor of the City of El Centro has called a Special Meeting of the El Centro City Council to consider the item(s) on this agenda.

The public may attend in person. Any member of the public attending in person and wishing to make a comment is asked to complete a speaker slip and follow the instructions below regarding “Notice to the Public”. Any member of the public is invited to submit public comments in advance of the meeting to be answered at the meeting. Please email your questions to [email protected] or call 760-337-4515 by July 31, 2024.

COUNCIL MEMBERS, STAFF AND THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND VIA ZOOM.

To participate and make a public comment in person, via Zoom or telephone, please raise your hand, speak up and introduce yourself.

Join Zoom Meeting:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/4180375132?pwd=Rmo5UjZ1cWdyV1VoWUhSZWp6R0tVZz09&omn=89669609531 Optional dial-in number: 1 (669) 444-9171
Meeting ID: 418 037 5132 Passcode: 5iHJYM
Public comments via zoom are subject to the same time limits as those in person.

Mayor & Council Members may be reached at (760) 336-8989 Mayor: Sylvia Marroquin City Manager: Cedric Ceseña
Interim Mayor ProTem:Martha Cardenas-Singh City Attorney: Elizabeth Martyn Evans Council Members: Tomás Oliva City Clerk: Norma Wyles
Sonia Carter
Edgard Garcia
4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION

ALL TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY VARY
Agenda City Council of the City of El Centro July 31, 2024 City of El Centro Page 2
CALL TO ORDER:

ROLL CALL BY CITY CLERK

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

INVOCATION
4:05-4:10 (TIME MAY VARY) PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Any person wishing to address the City Council on any matter on this agenda, is asked to complete a “Speakers Slip” and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Unless the Mayor extends the time, there is a three-minute time limit for each public comment. No comments on non-agenda items will be heard at this Special Meeting.
4:10-4:15 - CONSENT AGENDA:

1. Approval of City Council Minutes of July 16, 2024.

2. 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 24-02, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AMENDING SECTION 1.24

OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING USE OF THE CITY SEAL,
LOGOS, AND HASHTAGS, waive reading and adopt by title only.

3. Adopt Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE 2024-2025 FISCAL YEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
4:15-4:50 NEW BUSINESS:

4. Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget - Revised
PRESENTATION: Andy Heath
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIAADOPTING A REVISED ANNUAL BUDGET FOR SELECTED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25.

5. Update and Any Necessary Action Regarding ARPA Funding Related to Public Works Department Activities
PRESENTATION: Abraham Campos, PE - Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the revised list of ARPA projects as presented.

Agenda City Council of the City of El Centro July 31, 2024 City of El Centro Page 3

6. Discussion and Any Necessary Action Regarding the Approval of an Agreement with Dudek for Services Relating to the Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study
PRESENTATION: Abraham Campos, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING A CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH

DUDEK FOR DESIGN SERVICES RELATING TO THE WATER & SEWER MASTER PLAN AND COST OF SERVICE RATE STUDY.

7. Discussion and Any Necessary Action Regarding the Construction Award for the Southern Pump Station Project
PRESENTATION: Abraham Campos, Public Works Director/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION:

1. Approve project funding as presented in this report.

2. Approve Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AWARDING THE BID AND AUTHORIZING THE

EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH ROVE ENGINEERING FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHERN PUMP STATION PROJECT.

ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, California 92243, Monday-Friday during normal business hours.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the office of the City Clerk at (760)337-4515. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangement to assure accessibility to this meeting.

City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: City Clerk's Office
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Minutes
Prepared By: Norma Wyles
SCHEDULED Department Head: Norma Wyles
ACTION ITEM (ID # 6478) DOC ID: 6478
Approval of City Council Minutes of July 16, 2024.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approval of City Council Minutes of July 16, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS:
· 07-16-2024 Regular CC Minutes (PDF)
1 Packet Pg. 4
Book 37

REGULAR MEETING

EL CENTRO CITY COUNCIL

CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1275 MAIN STREET, EL CENTRO, CA
TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2024, 11:30 A.M.

The El Centro City Council met in a regular session on Tuesday, July 16, 2024 at 11:32 a.m. in Conference Room A, El Centro City Hall, 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California for the purpose of closed session.

PRESENT: Council: Cardenas-Singh, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter City Clerk Wyles, City Attorney Martyn Evans
ABSENT: Council: Oliva (arrived at 11:38 a.m.)
City Manager (arrived at 12:40 p.m.)

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT
None

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
Moved by Cardenas-Singh, second by Garcia, to adjourn into closed session for:

ANTICIPATED LITIGATION BY THE CITY
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council upon the advice of its legal counsel, and based upon existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant possibility of initiation of litigation by the City pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) - 1 case.

ANTICIPATED LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY
A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Council upon the advice of its legal counsel, and based upon existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant possibility of initiation of litigation by the City pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) - 2 cases.

CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS:

Property: APN 054-310-037.

Agency negotiators: City Manager and Community Services Director Negotiating party: Rove Engineering
Under negotiation: price and terms
Motion carried.

Closed Session concluded at 1:45 p.m.

City Council recessed to 6:00 p.m.

1.a
Packet Pg. 5
Attachment: 07-16-2024 Regular CC Minutes (6478 : Approval of City Council Minutes) Book 37

OPEN SESSION
The El Centro City Council met in a regular session on Tuesday, July 16, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, El Centro City Hall, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, California.

PRESENT: Council: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter (via Zoom) City Clerk Wyles, City Manager Ceseña, City Attorney Martyn Evans Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America was led by Interim Mayor Pro-Tem CardenasSingh and Invocation was given by Council Member Oliva.

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
No reportable action at this time.

ADDED ITEM TO THE AGENDA
Mayor Marroquin also asked for a motion and a second to add a presentation to this agenda as item 4a., Adelaida Arvizu, Certificate of Recognition. Motion by Cardenas-Singh and second by Oliva, all in favor 4/0.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Carter
ABSTAINED: None

MOTION TO ADD COUNCIL MEMBER CARTER TO THIS MEETING
Mayor Marroquin also asked for a motion and a second to have Council Member Carter to join the meeting:

Motion by Oliva, second by Garcia. Motion passed 4/0 to allow CM Carter to join the ongoing meeting.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Carter
ABSTAINED: None

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments were made by Sky Ainsworth and Robert Williams.

PRESENTATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS BY MAYOR

1. Measure P Funding for Youth Sports Program update from El Centro Little League. Presentations was made by Ivan Murillo.

2. Certificate of Recognition for Mr. Jon LeDoux, retiring from El Centro Elementary School District as the superintendent.

3. Certificate of Appreciation for Mr. Victor Zazueta for serving on the Library & Community Services Board and Friends of El Centro Community Services Foundation Board.

4. Certificate of Appreciation for Mr. Todd Evangelist for serving on the Friends of El Centro Community Services Foundation Board.
4a. Certificate of Recognition for Ms. Adelaida Arvizu for achieving Nation’s Premier Collegiate Honor Society lifetime membership.

1.a
Packet Pg. 6
Attachment: 07-16-2024 Regular CC Minutes (6478 : Approval of City Council Minutes) Book 37

CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS 5-9)
Moved by Cardenas-Singh, second by Oliva, approving consent items # 5-9.

5. Warrant Register’s for the Month of June 2024.

6. Approval of Payroll Registers for the Month of June 2024.

7. Approval of the Treasurer’s Report for the Month of June 2024.

8. Approval of City Council Minutes of June 27, 2024 and July 2, 2024.

9. Acceptance of Resignation from Mr. Victor Zazueta from the Library and Community Services Board.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Carter
ABSTAINED: None

NEW BUSINESS

10. Moved by Oliva, second by Garcia, adoption of Resolution No. 24-60, RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO SETTING OUT THE TERMS AND

CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR CERTIFIED WATER TREATMENT PLANT

OPERATORS, CERTIFIED WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OPERATORS, AND CERTIFIED WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATORS/SEWER.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

11. Moved by Garcia, second by Oliva, adoption of Resolution No. 24-61, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PROGRAM.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

12. Moved by Cardenas-Singh, second by Marroquin, approval of Ordinance No. 24-02, ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AMENDING SECTION 1.24 OF THE

MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING USE OF THE CITY SEAL, LOGOS AND HASHTAGS, approved as first reading and authorized the City Clerk to place on the next agenda for second reading and adoption.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: 07-16-2024 Regular CC Minutes (6478 : Approval of City Council Minutes) Book 37

13. Moved by Oliva, second by Cardenas-Singh, appointment of Jacob Bermudez to the Personnel Appeals Board to fill one unscheduled vacancy with term ending April 15, 2027.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

14. Moved by Cardenas-Singh, second by Oliva, appointment of Matthew Cowie to the Library & Community Services Board to fill one unscheduled vacancy with term ending June 30, 2026.

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

LEGISLATIVE
None

INFORMATION ITEM

15. Received Old City Library Electrical Emergency Repairs report.

16. Received and referred to Community Development Department, Application for Alcoholic Beverage License – Belenus LLC, Los Compadres Market, 531 N. 5th Street, El Centro, CA 92243-1812.

TASK FORCE AND MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS
Mayor and Council Members reported on their activities since last City Council meeting and upcoming events.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
Reported on activities.

ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:16 p.m. __________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED BY:
________________________________
Sylvia Marroquin, Mayor

1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: 07-16-2024 Regular CC Minutes (6478 : Approval of City Council Minutes) City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: City Clerk's Office
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Ordinance
Prepared By: Norma Wyles
SCHEDULED Department Head: Norma Wyles
ORDINANCE (ID # 6468) DOC ID: 6468
2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 24-02, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
CENTRO AMENDING SECTION 1.24 OF THE MUNICIPAL

CODE GOVERNING USE OF THE CITY SEAL, LOGOS AND
HASHTAGS, waive reading and adopt by title only.

CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 24-02, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AMENDING SECTION 1.24 OF THE

MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING USE OF THE CITY SEAL, LOGOS, AND HASHTAGS , waive reading and adopt by title only.

ATTACHMENTS:
· ORDINANCE NO. 24-002 CITY INSIGNIA ORDINANCE (DOCX)
2 Packet Pg. 9
07/2024/cdz/Ordinance/AmendedSectiononCityLogo,
Seals&Hashtags 1
ORDINANCE NO. 24-02

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AMENDING SECTION 1.24 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE GOVERNING USE OF

THE CITY SEAL, LOGOS AND HASHTAGS
Section 1. The City Council of the City of El Centro finds as follows:
a. The City Council finds that it is necessary to ensure that not only the seal but the City’s official name, logos, insignia, and other identifiable markings or symbols will be used only for City purposes or for purposes approved by and related to the City.
b. The Municipal Code currently addresses designs similar to the City seal or insignia; however, as the use of such symbols expands, it is also necessary, and instructive to define such insignia (as they exist now or may exist in the future) to provide for guidance to the public and enforcement of the restrictions set out.

This ordinance is declaratory and explanatory of existing law. c. The City seal, official name, City logos, or other identifiable markings used by the City are for the exclusive use of the City through its officers and employees in the course and scope of their official duties.

Section 2. Sec. 1-24. – “City seal and insignia” shall be amended to read as follows:
a. It shall be unlawful and a violation of this Code for any person to use or allow to be used any reproduction or facsimile of the City seal or other insignia, including any design so closely resembling the City seal or insignia, whether or not there is an intent to deceive, without first having obtained the permission of the City Council on terms determined by this ordinance or by City Council action.
b. As used here, the City seal means the following symbol with the inscription shown, which has been adopted as the City's official seal. c. As used here, “insignia” means and includes the following in addition to the City seal, which insignia are deemed adopted by the City Council:

2.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ORDINANCE NO. 24-002 CITY INSIGNIA ORDINANCE (6468 : 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 24-02- Amending Chapter 07/2024/cdz/Ordinance/AmendedSectiononCityLogo,
Seals&Hashtags 2
(1) Any City logo shown below:
(2) The following hashtags: #WeareElCentro #SomosElCentro (3) In addition, any City logo adopted or approved in writing by the City Council or the City Manager in writing at the request of any City department or as set out in City policies, as those may be adopted from time-to-time. This may include authorization for use by City partner organizations for uses supporting the City as provided by City policy.
d. No person shall use or be allowed to use City name or insignia or any facsimile or reproduction of them, make or use any design which is an imitation of them or which may be mistaken for them, for whatever purpose other than a City purpose, except on the terms and conditions set out in this Section. e. “Use” as set out in subsection (d) above includes but is not limited to any correspondence, printed materials, emails or social media postings distributed or displayed in favor of or against any ballot measure or in favor of or against any candidate for public office.
f. Violations of this provision shall be a misdemeanor, and shall be governed by Code Section 1-12.

Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance with the names of these City Council persons voting for and against the ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of El Centro, California.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the 16th day of July 2024.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the day of 2024.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
By_______________________________
Sylvia Marroquin, Mayor

2.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ORDINANCE NO. 24-002 CITY INSIGNIA ORDINANCE (6468 : 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 24-02- Amending Chapter 07/2024/cdz/Ordinance/AmendedSectiononCityLogo,
Seals&Hashtags 3
ATTEST
By ________________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
By ________________________________
Elizabeth Martyn, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL ) ss

CITY OF EL CENTRO )
I, Norma Wyles, City Clerk of the City of El Centro, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 24-02 had its first reading on July 16, 2024, and had its second reading on 2024, and was passed by the following vote:

AYES: Cardenas-Singh, Oliva, Marroquin, Garcia, Carter
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

By_______________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

2.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ORDINANCE NO. 24-002 CITY INSIGNIA ORDINANCE (6468 : 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 24-02- Amending Chapter City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: Finance
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Resolution
Prepared By: Norma Wyles
SCHEDULED Department Head: Elizabeth Fuchen
ACTION ITEM (ID # 6480) DOC ID: 6480
Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE 2024-2025

FISCAL YEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

N/A
DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTORS LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKS, INSURANCE, ETC:

N/A
BACKGROUND:

Article XIII B of the California Constitution requires cities and counties to adopt an Appropriations Limit on an annual basis.

DISCUSSION:

The 2025 Appropriations Limit has been calculated using the change in total population and the change in California per capita income.

This resolution establishes the City’s 2025 Appropriations Limit at $50,648,489.

CONCLUSION:

Adopt Resolution No. 24-____, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE 2024-2025 FISCAL

YEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

ATTACHMENTS:
· Appropriations Limit - Exhibit A-1 (PDF)
· Appropriations Limit - Exhibit A-2 (PDF)
· Resolution 24- (DOCX)
3 Packet Pg. 13
Exhibit A-1
Gann Appropriations
Limit
History
The voters of California, during a special election in 1979, approved Article XIII-B of the California State Constitution (informally known as Proposition 4, or the "Gann Initiative"), which restricts the total amount of appropriations allowed in any given fiscal year from the "proceeds of taxes." In 1980, the State Legislature added Section 9710 to the Government Code which required the governing body of each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year was equal to the previous year's limit, adjusted for population changes, and the change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (or California per Capita Personal Income, if smaller). The necessary statistical information is provided each year by the California Department of Finance.

In June 1990, the voters modified the original Article XIII-B (Proposition 4) with the passage of Proposition 111 and its implementing legislation (California Senate Bill 88). Beginning with the 1990-91 appropriations limit, a City may choose annual adjustment factors. The adjustment factors include the growth in the California Per Capita Income or the growth in the non-residential assessed valuation due to construction within the City, and the population growth within the County or the City. Under Proposition 4, if a city ends the fiscal year having more proceeds of taxes than the limit allows, it must return the excess to the taxpayers within two years (either by reducing taxes levied or fees charged).

Calculation of Limitation
Appropriations Limit for: FY 2023/2024 $48,218,474
Adjustment Factors: % Ratio
Population Factor (City) 1.0362
Price Factor 1.0137
Population Factor * Price Factor (1.0362 X 1.0137) 1.05039594

Appropriations Limit for: FY 2024/2025 $50,648,489
El Centro and the Future
The following table provides an analysis of the City of El Centro’s appropriations limit. Historically, the City has remained well below its appropriations limit. For the 2024/2025 fiscal year, there is a significant gap of $11,148,466 between the appropriations limit and the total City’s appropriations. With such a sizable margin, the provisions related to the return of taxes clearly do not, and will not, apply the City of El Centro any time in the near future.

Fiscal Year
Appropriations
Limit
Total City’s
Appropriations
2012/2013 29,486,775 19,280,830
2013/2014 31,350,339 19,985,907
2014/2015 31,362,566 22,830,292
2015/2016 32,912,190 25,794,510
2016/2017 34,853,022 26,639,019
2017/2018 36,395,617 32,235,812
2018/2019 38,482,178 30,052,295
2019/2020 40,011,845 30,793,677
2020/2021 41,396,375 31,141,570
2021/2022 43,273,783 34,678,805
2022/2023 46,163,972 38,740,049
20023/2024 48,218,474 40,988,582
2024/2025 50,648,489 39,500,023

3.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Appropriations Limit - Exhibit A-1 (6480 : Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year) Exhibit A-1

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

3.a
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: Appropriations Limit - Exhibit A-1 (6480 : Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year) Exhibit A - 2
Price Factor = Increase in California Per Capita Income = 3.62
Population Factor = Increase in Total City Population
= 1.37
2025 Factor = Price Factor x Population Factor
= 1.0362 x 1.0137
= 1.05039594
2025 Appropriations Limit = 2024 Limit x 2025 Factor
= 48,218,474 x 1.05039594
= 50,648,489
City of El Centro
2025 Appropriations Limit

3.b
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Appropriations Limit - Exhibit A-2 (6480 : Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0098/Reso/FY24-25AppropriationsLimit
RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL

CENTRO ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE 2024-2025 FISCAL YEAR IN ACCORDANCE WITH

ARTICLE XIII B OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, in 1979, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 4, which was a spending-limit initiative to restrict growth of tax-funded programs and services by California cities and counties and which created Article XIII B of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, in 1990, the voters of the State of California amended Article XIII B of the California Constitution by approving Proposition 111; and WHEREAS, Article XIII B requires that the governing body of each local jurisdiction shall, post the calculations and thereafter by resolution, to establish its appropriations limit annually; and WHEREAS, the City Council has selected the following adjustment methods: the CPI for the cost-of-living adjustment; for the change in population, the percentage change in population within the City, both as provided by the State of California as shown by Exhibits A-1 and A-2, attached and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the foregoing is true, correct and adopted.

2. That the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, establishes fifty million, six hundred forty-eight thousand, four hundred and eighty-nine dollars ($50,648,489) as shown on Exhibit “A-1” and “A-2”, as the City’s appropriations limit for the 2024-2025 fiscal year.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the day of , 2024.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
By_________________________
Sylvia Marroquin, Mayor
ATTEST:

By_____________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

3.c
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Resolution 24- (6480 : Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0098/Reso/FY24-25AppropriationsLimit
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
By______________________________
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL ) ss

CITY OF EL CENTRO )
I, Norma Wyles, City Clerk of the City of El Centro, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24- was duly and regularly adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the day of , 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

By___________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

3.c
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Resolution 24- (6480 : Adopt Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the 2025 Fiscal Year) City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: Finance
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Amendment
Prepared By: Elizabeth Fuchen
SCHEDULED Department Head: Elizabeth Fuchen
ACTION ITEM (ID # 6479) DOC ID: 6479
Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget - Revised
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A REVISED ANNUAL BUDGET FOR SELECTED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25
FISCAL IMPACT:

Appropriations recommended for the revised budgets for all funds discussed herein are balanced with anticipated revenues and use of fund balances / reserves as required.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

The Revised Budget includes allocations to fund the operations directly involved in the strategic plan goals: Financial & Governance Stability; Environmental Stability; Community Health; Safety & Welfare; Recreation & Lifelong Learning; City Beautification; Engagement & Civic Pride; and Economic Opportunity.

DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTORS LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKS, INSURANCE, ETC:

N/A
BACKGROUND:

As a means to provide the City of El Centro with a spending plan for Fiscal Year 2024- 25, the City Council adopted the current budget on June 27, 2024. Over the course of the last two months, the City has engaged a Financial Services Consultant who has worked with staff to review and enhance financial reporting systems - focusing on the City’s revenue and expenditure streams to identify areas of improvement that could bolster the City’s budget.

DISCUSSION:

Updates to the adopted budget have been prepared for each of the City’s major operating funds - the General Fund; Water Enterprise Fund; Wastewater Enterprise Fund; and Measure P Fund. High-level updates to each of these funds are briefly discussed below and will form the basis for a presentation to the City Council during the July 31, 2024 Special City Council Meeting.

General Fund Budget
FY 2024-25 General Fund Revised Budget:
4 Packet Pg. 19
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
Revenues Expenditures
FY 2023-24 Estimated $ 36,223,044 $ 35,516,008
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget $ 38,719,519 $ 38,569,246
The FY 2024-25 General Fund Revised Budget reflects revenues of $38,719,519 and expenditures of $38,569,246. The General Fund Revised Budget is presented as a balanced budget with an anticipated surplus of $150,273 being generated by year-end.

Specific revenue and expenditure impacts to the City’s Revised General Fund for FY 2024-25 are noted below.

FY 2024-25 budgeted revenue of $38,719,519 reflects an approximate $2.5 million increase from revenues anticipated to be collected in FY 2023-24, primarily due to:
- Anticipated 3.0% increase in Property Taxes consistent with current housing market activity and increase in State CPI;
- Anticipated higher collections of Sales Tax consistent with staff expectations given the current state of the local economy;
- Anticipated 3.0% increase in Transient Occupancy Taxes as room rates are projected to rise due to inflation and consistent with current activity; - Essentially flat year-over-year collections of development- and recreation-related fees and charges; and
- A $2.1 million transfer in from the Measure P Fund to cover anticipated FY 2024- 25 General Fund costs for all Public Safety (Police and Fire) Materials and Services / Capital and Outlay costs.

FY 2024-25 budgeted expenditures of $38,569,246 reflects an approximate $3.1 million increase from expenditures anticipated to be incurred in FY 2023-24, primarily due to:
- Accounting for all staff positions in the General Fund as being filled for the entirety of the fiscal year with the exception of reducing these amounts for an implied “vacancy savings” factor equal to 50% of the existing vacancies ($1.7 million) in the General Fund;
- An increase of $881,000 for the General Fund portion of the CalPERS Unfunded Liability amortization cost;
- A reduction in the amount of Worker’s Compensation costs allocated to each position from 11% to 9% based on estimated premiums to be paid during FY 2024-25 (results in savings of approximately $200,000):
- An increase of approximately $369,000 for the City’s Liability and Property insurance costs (note: a portion of these costs are allocated to other funds consistent with the City’s cost allocation methodology); - An increase of approximately $408,000 in costs transferred out of the General Fund and into the Water and Sewer Funds consistent with the cost allocation 4 Packet Pg. 20
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
methodology;
- An $80,000 increase in energy costs related to the City’s Streetlighting Program; and
- Nominal increases to department base budgets where required to account for inflationary increases / increased costs to provide ongoing City services.

Taking into account the above, the recommended Revised General Fund Budget is balanced. Total General Fund reserves are anticipated to be approximately $24.5 million at the end of FY 2024-25. Projected reserve levels as of June 30, 2025 are expected to include:
- $ 3,892,006 Restricted Reserve for PARS Retirement Trust - 20,639,461 Undesignated Reserves
- $ 24,531,467 Total General Fund Reserves
General Fund Multi-Year Forecast
As a means to gauge the future ability to provide a consistent level of citywide services and programs, a Multi-Year Forecast has been developed for the City’s General Fund - the fund where the vast majority of non-enterprise services are accounted for.

The General Fund forecast has been developed to create a forward-looking, conservative baseline budgetary outlook for the City’s General Fund and related fund balance under a given set of revenue and expenditure growth assumptions. The forecast has been built as a “base-case” model in which future years only focus on ongoing revenues and expenditures; and known one-time fiscal activity (eliminates all other one-time revenues and expenditures).

The General Fund forecast is meant to serve as only one tool to measure fiscal sustainability into the future. The model below incorporates known cost drivers, including any negotiated salary increases, CalPERS retirement cost increases, annual appropriation credits for salary savings and cost allocations, and a conservative increase in all other operating expenditures. The model also assumes conservative growth in discretionary revenue sources, including property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax and other fees and charges. The model is developed to demonstrate the ability to sustain the existing levels of service provided citywide. 4 Packet Pg. 21
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
As indicated in the model above, a slight surplus of $150,273 is anticipated in the revised General Fund budget for FY 2024-25. Future forecasts indicate continued surpluses and one year with a small deficit of $82,976 (FY 2028-29). Although each year in the forecast assumes growth factors for both revenues and expenditures, growth in core payroll is not assumed as there are currently no labor increases that have been negotiated for FY 2025-26 and beyond.

An overview of the General Fund Multi-Year Forecast will be provided during the July 31, 2024 Special City Council Meeting.

As shown in the graph below, total expenditures for CalPERS-related costs are anticipated to increase by $1.7 million over the next five years. This amount represents approximately 22% of the entire expenditure base in the General Fund. 4 Packet Pg. 22
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
Forecast - General Fund Balance impacts:

As noted above, to the extent forecasted amounts of revenues and expenditures come to fruition under a given set of assumptions, General Fund Balance (reserves) will fluctuate between $24.5 and $25.3 million each year. These reserves include a $3.9 million restricted reserve for the PARS Retirement Trust, which may be used for any future CalPERS retirement cost. The unobligated reserve amount of approximately $20.6 million represents 53% of the General Fund expenditure base.

Water Fund(s)
FY 2024-25 Water Fund Revised Budget:
4 Packet Pg. 23
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
Revenues Expenditures
FY 2023-24 Estimated $ 9,483,350 $ 9,428,141
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget $ 9,365,000 $ 11,209,057
FY 2024-25 Water Fund revenues are currently projected to be slightly lower than amounts anticipated to be collected during FY 2023-24, primarily due to lower anticipated collections of late fees and water capacity fees, which are difficult to project.

FY 2024-25 Water Fund expenditures are recommended to be approximately $1.78 million higher than those estimated for FY 2023-24 primarily due to accounting for fullyloaded staff costs (no vacancy savings assumed); a $50,000 increase in CalPERS Unfunded Liability amortization costs; higher anticipated energy costs (electricity); a $209,000 increase in overhead cost allocation; and a $1 million increase in capital projects appropriations.

The Water Fund has $1.52 million in capital projects / outlay budgeted for FY 2024-25.

It is anticipated that the Water Fund(s) will have $26,815,012 in Fund Balance / Working Capital at the end of FY 2024-25. Amounts expected to be available on June 30, 2025 are noted below:
- $ 2,608,609 Water Capacity Fees (Fund 511)
- 1,289,763 Rate Stabilization (Fund 513)
- 2,093,223 Restricted for Debt Service
- 20,823,417 Undesignated Reserves / Working Capital
- $ 26,815,012 Total Water Fund(s) Reserves / Working Capital Wastewater Fund(s)
FY 2024-25 Wastewater Fund Revised Budget:

Revenues Expenditures
FY 2023-24 Estimated $ 11,055,762 $ 11,761,496
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget $ 10,898,500 $ 19,223,098
FY 2024-25 Wastewater Fund revenues are currently projected to be slightly lower than amounts anticipated to be collected during FY 2023-24, primarily due to lower anticipated collections of interest earnings and wastewater capacity fees. FY 2024-25 Wastewater Fund expenditures are recommended to be approximately $7.46 million higher than those estimated for FY 2023-24 primarily due to accounting for fully-loaded staff costs (no vacancy savings assumed); a $50,000 increase in CalPERS Unfunded Liability amortization costs; higher anticipated energy costs (electricity); a $199,000 4 Packet Pg. 24
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
increase in overhead cost allocation; and a $6.59 million increase in capital projects appropriations. The majority of the capital cost increase can be attributed to a $4.5 million appropriation towards the Southern Pump Station.

The Wastewater Fund has a total of $9.95 million in capital projects / outlay budgeted for FY 2024-25.

It is anticipated that the Wastewater Fund(s) will have $19,937,185 in Fund Balance / Working Capital at the end of FY 2024-25. Amounts expected to be available on June 30, 2025 are noted below:
- $ 2,651,686 Wastewater Capacity Fees (Fund 512)
- 3,636,896 Rate Stabilization (Fund 514)
- 13,648,603 Undesignated Reserves / Working Capital
- $ 19,937,185 Total Wastewater Fund(s) Reserves / Working Capital Measure P Fund
FY 2024-25 Measure P Fund Revised Budget:

Revenues Expenditures
FY 2023-24 Estimated $ 7,856,000 $ 10,378,369
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget $ 7,968,590 $ 19,335,092
The Measure P Fund accounts for a 30-year ½-cent transaction and use tax (general purpose tax) approved by the electorate in 2017 that is used to support an array of City services including police, fire protection, library, parks and recreation, senior programs, and street maintenance and upgrades.

FY 2024-25 Measure P Fund revenues are currently projected to be slightly higher than amounts anticipated to be collected during FY 2023-24, primarily due to a 1.5% increase in sales tax projected for FY 2024-25. FY 2024-25 Measure P Fund expenditures are recommended to be approximately $8.96 million higher than those estimated for FY 2023-24 primarily due to an increase to debt service costs related to the Police Station ($596,000); a transfer out to the General Fund for all public safety (Police and Fire) materials and services costs budgeted for FY 2024-25 ($2.13 million); and a $5.82 million increase in capital projects appropriations. The majority of the increase in capital projects appropriations can be attributed to $4 million allocated for the construction of the new police station and $1.7 allocated for the demolition of Valley Center Point.

The Measure P Fund has $13.02 million in capital projects / outlay budgeted for FY 2024-25.

It is anticipated that the Measure P Fund will have $7,640,245 remaining in Fund 4 Packet Pg. 25
Action Item (ID # 6479) Meeting of July 31, 2024
Balance at the end of FY 2024-25.

CONCLUSION:

Adopt the fiscal year 2025 City of El Centro Annual Revised Budget as presented.

ATTACHMENTS:
· FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (PDF)
· Resolution 24- Annual Budget (DOCX)
4 Packet Pg. 26

CITY OF EL CENTRO
FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 BUDGET SCHEDULES (REVISED)
PREPARED: JULY 31, 2024

4.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) EST. BEGINNING ENDING Excess / (Deficit)
FUND BALANCE FUND BALANCE of Revenues
July 1, 2024 REVENUES EXPENDITURES June 30, 2025 over Expenses General Fund $ 24,381,194 $ 38,719,519 $ 38,569,246 $ 24,531,467 $ 150,273 Enterprise Funds
501 / 511 / 513 - Water $ 28,659,069 9,365,000 $ 11,209,057 $ 26,815,012 $ (1,844,057) 502 / 512 / 514 - Wastewater 28,261,783 10,898,500 19,223,098 19,937,185 (8,324,598) Special Revenue Funds
299 - Measure P $ 19,006,747 $ 7,968,590 $ 19,335,092 $ 7,640,245 $ (11,366,502) City of El Centro
Budgeted Revenues / Expenditures / Fund Balance
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget - Revised

4.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget

GENERAL
FUND

4.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Detail

ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25

REVENUES
Property Taxes $ 4,197,852 $ 4,242,048 $ 4,491,170 $ 4,621,601 Other Taxes 19,658,966 19,749,920 20,179,848 20,742,261 Licenses & Permits 441,200 441,225 359,300 351,300
Fines & Forfietures 34,507 57,644 38,500 46,000
Intergovernmental 7,480,153 7,348,127 7,264,978 7,177,287 Charges for Services 1,000,692 1,022,278 1,014,190 920,500 Other Income 1,253,573 1,774,098 1,629,508 1,425,000
Operating Transfers In 1,099,142 1,173,984 1,245,550 3,435,570 Total Revenues $ 35,166,085 $ 35,809,324 $ 36,223,044 $ 38,719,519

EXPENDITURES
1101 - City Council $ 139,523 $ 202,976 $ 171,763 $ 187,431 1102 - City Clerk 253,445 327,230 391,936 410,544
1201 - City Manager 482,393 331,572 731,424 811,987
1202 - Public Information Office 19,328 16,631 13,500 44,258 1301 - Human Resources 684,438 592,822 708,040 739,945
1302 - Personnel Appeals Board - - - 9,500
1304 - Information Technology 449,430 521,652 596,452 687,246 1401 - City Attorney 363,776 493,343 405,469 453,271
1501 - Finance Administration 714,486 779,530 815,347 971,275 1502 - Data Processing 3,307 5,164 3,700 7,000
1801 - Facility Maintenance 678,009 776,900 716,221 801,755 1802 - Incubator Buildings 19,000 16,750 20,720 25,300
1901 - Non-Departmental 1,946,281 1,995,955 2,361,799 3,131,909 1902 - Service Credits (2,044,540) (1,895,839) (2,454,370) (4,564,487) 2101 - Police Services 9,116,865 9,764,324 10,473,299 12,320,506 2102 - Communications 1,124,918 1,251,652 1,320,217 1,385,939 2103 - Animal Control 171,267 172,086 145,735 207,881
2105 - POST 60,537 92,097 90,000 115,000
2301 - Fire Services 7,040,565 7,868,371 8,003,106 8,975,805 2303 - Prevention 8,875 11,022 14,870 22,448
2304 - Emergency Medic 49,708 66,736 51,965 75,488
2305 - Training 6,922 17,224 16,996 18,825
2306 - Hazardous Materials 10,749 42,568 21,700 16,040
3101 - Public Works Admin 95,110 149,905 163,029 148,058 3201 - Streets Maintenance 920,007 1,101,589 1,161,341 1,260,152 3203 - Street Lighting 409,972 421,914 420,000 500,000
3901 - IVRMA 75,345 83,077 95,778 95,000
4101 - Building Regulation 638,326 721,438 815,179 943,878 4301 - Engineering 473,544 478,670 443,188 526,865
4401 - Planning 460,595 373,318 599,095 776,888
4402 - Planning EIR's 49,694 183,605 67,100 70,000
5101 - Parks 1,337,805 1,816,671 1,927,214 1,815,277
5201 - Recreation 371,776 513,079 550,277 551,875
5202 - Community Center 257,498 349,172 311,947 396,803

4.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Detail

ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
5203 - PO Pavillion 74,000 48,438 47,988 78,379
5204 - Youth Center 125,231 157,558 197,061 287,624
5205 - Adult Center 115,205 154,666 211,067 181,194
5206 - Aquatic Park 1,115,340 1,273,680 1,430,441 1,337,353 5207 - Day Camp 70,796 68,874 51,404 79,286
5208 - Mini Bike 22,616 33,089 25,484 23,890
5211 - MLK Sports Court 378,337 460,226 407,247 439,078 5213 - Splash Pad 18,318 15,013 10,826 17,900
5214 - Skate Park 38,123 49,270 40,980 69,650
5301 - Library - Main 656,557 931,670 1,114,936 1,183,352 6201 - Economic Development 322,053 575,015 635,879 751,851 6202 - Blight Elimination 49,125 67,698 86,308 70,527
6203 - Valley Center Point 8,769 11,682 12,350 14,500
9101 - Transfers Out 2,553,021 65,226 70,000 95,000
Total Expenditures $ 31,936,445 $ 33,555,309 $ 35,516,008 $ 38,569,246 Excess / (Deficit) of Revenues over
Expenditures $ 3,229,640 $ 2,254,015 $ 707,036 $ 150,273 Beginning Fund Balance $ 18,190,503 $ 21,420,143 $ 23,674,158 $ 24,381,194 Ending Fund Balance $ 21,420,143 $ 23,674,158 $ 24,381,194 $ 24,531,467 Less - Fund Balance Restricted for:

PARS Retirement Trust $ 3,892,006 $ 3,892,006 $ 3,892,006 $ 3,892,006 Unassigned Fund Balance $ 17,528,137 $ 19,782,152 $ 20,489,188 $ 20,639,461

4.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Revenue Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget General Fund Revenue

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Account Revenue
410101 Secured Property Taxes $ 3,836,799 $ 3,880,630 $ 4,060,718 $ 4,182,540 410102 Unsecured Property Taxes 361,053 361,418 430,452 439,061 TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES 4,197,852 $ $ 4,242,048 $ 4,491,170 $ 4,621,601 420101 Sales Tax 16,342,832 16,658,352 16,856,925 17,344,408 420102 Transient Occupancy Taxes 2,423,575 2,180,030 2,448,677 2,522,137 420103 Franchise Fees - Natrual Gas 81,256 94,075 115,216 115,216 420104 Franchise Fees - Cable TV 260,444 241,179 211,000 211,000 420105 Business Licenses 430,041 480,855 455,530 455,000 420108 Real Property Transfer Tax 120,818 95,429 92,500 94,500 TOTAL OTHER TAXES 19,658,966 $ $ 19,749,920 $ 20,179,848 $ 20,742,261 430103 Building Permits 340,530 361,693 288,000 280,000 430104 Electrical Permits 51,795 46,094 44,000 42,500
430105 Mechanical Permits 15,180 10,868 8,000 9,000
430106 Plumbing Permits 25,491 15,571 14,000 14,000
430108 Grading Permits 6,976 5,546 4,000 4,500
430109 Oher Building Permits - - - -
430111 Taxi Stand Permits 1,228 1,453 1,300 1,300
TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS $ 441,200 $ 441,225 $ 359,300 $ 351,300 440101 Court Fines 26,595 32,969 20,000 25,500
440102 Parking Fines 3,700 13,656 14,500 15,500
440103 Vehicle Code Fines 4,212 11,019 4,000 5,000
TOTAL FINES & FORFEITURES $ 34,507 $ 57,644 $ 38,500 $ 46,000 450101 Motor Vehicle In Lieu Prop Tax 4,918,467 5,162,740 5,376,978 5,538,287 450114 POST Reimbursements 20,128 34,929 - 25,000
450116 Housing Authority 102,746 105,324 113,000 114,000 450200 Other Agencies - Misc. 495,442 558,907 662,192 468,000 450200 - ROPS Residuals 1,143,147 736,781 525,350 750,000 450200 - RDA Passthroughs 290,861 165,256 181,447 182,000 450200 - Strike Team Reimbursements 266,221 206,771 26,187 - 450200 - Insurance Reimbursements 129,641 - - -
450200 - Opioid Funding - 296,101 174,824 -
450300 Federal Grants 1,118 1,274 - -
450400 State Grants 112,382 80,044 205,000 100,000
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL 7,480,153 $ $ 7,348,127 $ 7,264,978 $ 7,177,287

4.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Revenue Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget General Fund Revenue

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Account Revenue
460101 Zoning & Variance Fees 108,921 93,231 86,000 86,000 460103 Plan Checking Fees 120,575 111,874 142,500 125,000 460105 EIR Fees 44,392 62,990 50,000 60,000
460106 Library Fees 6,201 11,614 16,500 10,000
460109 Code Enforcement Citations 38,783 28,364 36,000 32,500 460110 Animal Shelter Fees 817 1,884 1,000 1,000
460111 Street / Sidewalk Repairs 43,995 31,425 25,140 27,500 460112 Copying Charges 9,316 6,817 11,000 7,500
460115 Swimming Pool Fees 218,488 216,534 160,000 175,000 460116 Recreation Fees 32,509 44,386 58,000 50,000
460117 Community Center Fees 19,264 27,112 32,000 25,000 460120 Day Camp Fees 38,100 57,785 25,000 30,000
460121 NBN Fees 14,796 21,971 15,000 15,000
460124 Police Department Fees 94,564 123,755 65,000 70,000 460125 Fire Department Fees 101,580 111,502 135,000 125,000 460127 Other User Fees 99,391 55,329 140,000 70,000
460129 Contract Instructors 5,330 9,644 10,500 7,500
460130 NFL Fees - 2,166 - 2,000
460131 Referee Fees 3,670 3,895 5,550 1,500
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,000,692 $ $ 1,022,278 $ 1,014,190 $ 920,500 470121 Interest Earnings 42,788 191,216 300,000 300,000 470113 Other Income 116,766 212,314 31,500 35,000
470114 Proposition 172 Funding 323,065 327,838 328,008 350,000 470116 Insurance Recovery 38,457 - - -
470117 Recovery of Expenditures 1,459 164,284 40,000 -
470118 Solid Waste Expense Rec 574,863 739,200 790,000 600,000 470120 Contributions - - - -
470123 Rents & Royalties 156,175 139,246 140,000 140,000 TOTAL OTHER INCOME 1,253,573 $ $ 1,774,098 $ 1,629,508 $ 1,425,000 490101 Transfers In - Gas Tax 1,063,592 1,138,434 1,210,000 1,272,000 490101 Transfers In - LTA Admin 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 490101 Transfers In - Buena Vista LLD 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 490101 Transfers In - Legacy Ranch LLD 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 490101 Transfers In - Town Center 5,550 5,550 5,550 5,550 490101 Transfers In - Measure P Fund - - - 2,128,020
TOTAL OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 1,099,142 $ $ 1,173,984 $ 1,245,550 $ 3,435,570 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 35,166,085 $ $ 35,809,324 $ 36,223,044 $ 38,719,519

4.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1101 - City Council

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 53,388 73,537 59,858 66,476 520101 Retirement 14,168 16,499 5,488 5,957
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 7,790 8,947
520104 Group Health Insurance 32,812 64,526 45,634 57,469 520105 Worker's Compensation 5,343 7,360 5,988 5,443
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520109 Life Insurance 537 653 441 100
520110 Medicare 692 719 717 964
Total Personnel Services: $ 106,940 163,294 125,916 145,356 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,995 2,290 2,557 2,375
610109 Meeting and Travel 26,315 28,080 25,000 25,000
610110 Mayor's Expense 826 2,723 12,000 2,200
610113 Professional Fees / Other 420 34 - 150
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 400 300 900 1,500
610129 Other Expense 2,152 4,280 4,400 9,000
620101 Office Supplies 230 426 450 1,000
620103 Printing 174 231 390 500
620105 Computer Supplies 71 345 150 350
Total Material & Services: $ 32,583 38,709 45,847 42,075 Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ - 420 - -
720109 Computers - 553 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 973 - -
Total 1101 - City Council: $ 139,523 202,976 171,763 187,431

4.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1102 - City Clerk

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 135,957 164,705 195,622 203,629 510105 Overtime - 1,733 2,200 -
520101 Retirement 30,919 40,901 19,082 19,644
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 22,676 26,081
520104 Group Health Insurance 17,708 20,091 37,634 45,390 520105 Worker's Compensation 14,038 16,581 20,832 17,949 520106 Disability Insurance 641 776 965 1,237
520107 Unemployment Insurance 3,990 7,537 9,480 9,972
520109 Life Insurance 379 377 418 489
520110 Medicare 2,025 2,337 2,720 2,953
Total Personnel Services: $ 205,657 255,038 311,629 327,344 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,220 1,261 1,500 1,400
610106 Advertising 4,584 5,392 5,000 6,000
610107 Books & Periodicals 4,443 8,793 1,600 8,000
610109 Meeting and Travel 3,460 4,727 6,300 6,500
610113 Professional Fees / Other 28,068 42,846 47,000 53,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 4,111 2,528 10,500 6,000
610123 Training - - 1,422 -
620101 Office Supplies 1,902 2,231 2,300 2,300
Total Material & Services: $ 47,788 67,778 75,622 83,200 Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ - 576 - -
720102 Furtniture & Fixtures - 3,533 - -
720109 Computers - 305 4,685 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 4,414 4,685 -
Total 1102 - City Clerk: $ 253,445 327,230 391,936 410,544

4.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1201 - City Manager

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 317,105 182,063 431,632 518,294 510103 Salaries - Temporary - 6,966 19,592 -
510105 Overtime - 1,482 1,250 -
520101 Retirement 73,844 67,928 38,772 50,845
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 50,872 58,380
520103 Social Security - 142 3,468 -
520104 Group Health Insurance 26,006 17,291 43,108 59,954 520105 Worker's Compensation 33,414 20,341 48,516 46,457 520106 Disability Insurance 994 667 1,240 3,174
520107 Unemployment Insurance 9,519 9,246 22,076 25,809 520109 Life Insurance 569 306 331 759
520110 Medicare 4,596 2,691 6,236 7,515
Total Personnel Services: $ 466,047 309,123 667,093 771,187 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 3,109 1,849 8,900 3,500
610109 Meeting and Travel 6,111 6,518 - 6,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 464 223 3,000 -
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 2,182 2,911 2,130 7,300
610123 Training - 6,000 6,000
610129 Other Expense 474 3,316 3,000 2,000
610139 Community Sponsorship 1,200 2,111 7,225 4,000
620101 Office Supplies 1,410 1,257 2,000 1,300
620102 Postage 8 36 100 50
620103 Printing 38 100 700 2,100
620105 Computer Supplies 360 320 1,500 400
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 490 478 590 500
630107 Communications Equipment - - - 1,800
630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance 500 430 1,100 750 630112 Gasoline & Oil - - 3,850 3,600
630115 Outside Maintenance - - - 1,500
Total Material & Services: $ 16,346 19,549 40,095 40,800 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ - - 2,378 -
720106 Field Equipment - - 5,000 -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - - 6,108 -
720109 Computers - 2,900 10,750 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 2,900 24,236 -
Total 1201 - City Manager: $ 482,393 331,572 731,424 811,987

4.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1202 - Public Information Office

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610113 Professional Fees / Other $ 15,485 13,631 13,500 1,768 610115 Professional Fees / Legal 3,000 3,000 - 40,000
620103 Printing 843 - - 2,490
Total Material & Services: $ 19,328 16,631 13,500 44,258 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 1202 - Public Information Office: $ 19,328 16,631 13,500 44,258

4.a
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1301 - Human Resources

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 240,554 $ 286,364 $ 277,383 $ 345,044 510103 Salaries - Temporary 2,639 6,612 32,534 -
510105 Overtime 424 292 32,593 -
520101 Retirement 73,121 75,621 30,757 33,455
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 39,394 45,188
520103 Social Security 178 410 1,478 -
520104 Group Health Insurance 27,847 31,336 54,149 67,134 520105 Worker's Compensation 25,566 31,116 36,618 30,568 520106 Disability Insurance 1,079 1,278 1,373 2,071
520107 Unemployment Insurance 7,362 14,144 16,681 16,981 520109 Life Insurance 397 418 434 601
520110 Medicare 3,539 4,078 4,741 5,003
Total Personnel Services: $ 382,706 451,669 528,135 546,045 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,874 2,627 2,800 3,000
610107 Books & Periodicals 952 549 750 1,400
610109 Meeting and Travel - 43 - 4,500
610113 Professional Fees / Other 215,933 39,139 105,000 100,000 610115 Professional Fees / Legal 15,230 6,495 - 10,000
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 1,338 807 8,500 1,800
610122 Recruiting 30,861 42,171 30,000 30,000
610123 Training 1,941 3,646 3,400 3,500
610129 Other Expense 1,169 886 500 7,700
610132 Medical Services 5,620 5,014 6,200 7,500
610143 Wellness Program 12,837 14,194 12,500 18,000
620101 Office Supplies 3,690 3,620 2,600 4,500
620102 Postage 304 238 500 300
620103 Printing 649 691 655 500
620105 Computer Supplies - 919 3,500 -
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 917 922 2,500 1,200
Total Material & Services: $ 293,315 121,961 179,405 193,900 Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ - 10,933 - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures 7,195 2,587 - -
720109 Computers 1,222 5,672 500 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 8,417 19,192 500 -
Total 1301 - Human Resources: $ 684,438 592,822 708,040 739,945

4.a
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1302 - Personnel Appeals Board

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610129 Other Expense $ - - - 9,500
Total Material & Services: $ - - - 9,500
Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 1302 - Personnel Appeals Board: $ - - - 9,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1304 - Information Technology

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 188,588 $ 140,568 $ 194,767 $ 223,612 510105 Overtime 688 3,232 2,350 -
520101 Retirement 45,214 43,681 18,892 21,908
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 25,894 29,721
520104 Group Health Insurance 32,384 17,039 35,456 45,390 520105 Worker's Compensation 20,270 13,991 20,550 20,017 520106 Disability Insurance 952 639 925 1,403
520107 Unemployment Insurance 5,650 6,360 9,347 11,120
520109 Life Insurance 385 196 304 408
520110 Medicare 2,805 2,057 2,717 3,242
Total Personnel Services: $ 296,936 227,763 311,202 356,821 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 4,699 4,439 5,000 5,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 47,484 85,615 75,300 99,400 610121 Dues & Subscriptions - 70,070 90,350 90,900
610123 Training - 4,490 2,000 5,000
610129 Other Expense 194 132 500 1,000
620101 Office Supplies 1,734 1,053 1,000 1,425
620105 Computer Supplies 1,987 2,061 3,500 3,500
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 42,000 40,543 57,400 59,200 630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance 52,368 85,486 46,300 65,000 Total Material & Services: $ 150,466 293,889 281,350 330,425 Capital Projects / Outlay
720102 Furniture & Fixtures $ 2,028 - - -
720109 Computers - - 3,900 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 2,028 - 3,900 -
Total 1304 - Information Technology: $ 449,430 521,652 596,452 687,246

4.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1401 - City Attorney

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 23,595 $ 26,939 $ 14,183 $ 25,714 510105 Overtime - 1,482 719 -
520101 Retirement 5,586 6,156 1,368 2,503
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 3,344 3,791
520104 Group Health Insurance 4,346 4,235 2,132 7,543
520105 Worker's Compensation 2,555 2,907 1,526 2,287
520106 Disability Insurance 136 147 71 153
520107 Unemployment Insurance 728 1,321 699 1,271
520109 Life Insurance 57 49 22 56
520110 Medicare 366 409 215 373
Total Personnel Services: $ 37,369 43,645 24,279 43,691 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 696 800 1,000 1,000
610107 Books & Periodicals 475 475 560 650
610109 Meeting & Travel 595 - - 400
610116 Professional Fees / Legal 320,526 443,655 375,000 400,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 2,557 2,608 2,800 3,200
610129 Other Expense 463 500 250 1,700
620101 Office Supplies 400 319 300 400
620102 Postage 102 36 130 130
620103 Printing 199 150 350 900
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 394 1,155 800 1,200
Total Material & Services: $ 326,407 449,698 381,190 409,580 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 1401 - City Attorney $ 363,776 493,343 405,469 453,271

4.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1501 - Finance

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 451,095 $ 434,738 $ 481,703 $ 587,882 510103 Salaries - Temporary - 19,874 35,000 -
510105 Overtime 2,201 13,350 13,951 -
520101 Retirement 103,538 113,056 43,342 57,374
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 58,014 66,568
520103 Social Security - 775 960 -
520104 Group Health Insurance 51,014 41,843 47,228 80,098 520105 Worker's Compensation 46,575 47,706 49,109 52,423 520106 Disability Insurance 2,092 1,982 1,689 3,667
520107 Unemployment Insurance 13,349 21,685 22,367 29,124 520109 Life Insurance 885 680 587 1,065
520110 Medicare 4,411 5,405 6,547 8,524
Total Personnel Services: $ 675,160 701,094 760,497 886,725 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,938 2,021 2,600 3,500
610107 Books & Periodicals - 545 - 500
610109 Meeting & Travel 278 - 1,200 5,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other - 9,877 600 15,000
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 1,091 990 1,000 1,500
610123 Training - - 1,500 3,000
610128 Auditing 15,820 34,510 18,000 35,000
610129 Other Expense 2,790 2,884 2,000 2,500
620101 Office Supplies 8,820 12,527 9,000 10,000
620102 Postage 394 332 400 550
620103 Printing 8,195 7,084 5,500 8,000
Total Material & Services: $ 39,326 70,770 41,800 84,550 Capital Projects / Outlay
720109 Computers $ - 7,666 13,050 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 7,666 13,050 -
Total 1501 - Finance: $ 714,486 779,530 815,347 971,275

4.a
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1502 - Data Processing

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610114 Professional Fees (D) $ - - - 3,000
620105 Computer Supplies 3,307 5,164 3,700 4,000
Total Material & Services: $ 3,307 5,164 3,700 7,000
Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 1502 - Data Processing $ 3,307 5,164 3,700 7,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1801 - Facility Maintenance

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 351,912 $ 328,342 $ 356,730 $ 453,124 510105 Overtime 2,919 9,994 16,543 10,000
520101 Retirement 83,290 88,849 34,429 44,633
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 48,006 55,044
520104 Group Health Insurance 83,760 66,367 64,695 75,224 520105 Worker's Compensation 37,514 34,260 37,741 40,781 520106 Disability Insurance 1,956 1,784 1,966 2,867
520107 Unemployment Insurance 10,566 15,573 17,192 22,656 520109 Life Insurance 851 653 614 969
520110 Medicare 5,131 4,620 5,195 6,715
Total Personnel Services: $ 577,899 550,442 583,111 712,013 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 2,001 2,004 2,700 2,400
610109 Meeting & Travel 90 681 800 2,000
610123 Training 99 - - 400
610125 Uniform Rental 4,543 4,431 3,250 6,000
620101 Office Supplies 1,497 1,426 1,500 1,900
620112 Protective Clothing 2,702 3,506 3,000 4,000
620128 Janitorial Supplies 12,693 11,867 7,500 12,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 8,896 6,861 5,000 10,000
620131 Painting Supplies 85 72 100 300
620140 Small Tools 1,769 2,985 1,500 2,000
630101 Building Maintenance 24,815 164,383 80,000 20,000 630106 Office Machines Maintenance 1,230 592 600 1,000
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 3,762 3,420 3,500 4,000 630112 Gasoline & Oil 15,511 13,483 15,400 15,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 1,158 127 150 300
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 7,697 7,697 8,110 8,442
Total Material & Services: $ 88,548 223,535 133,110 89,742 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ 4,831 - - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures 6,731 - - -
720105 Portable Shop Equipment - - - -
720109 Computers - 2,923 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 11,562 2,923 - -
Total 1801 - Facility Maintenance: $ 678,009 776,900 716,221 801,755

4.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1802 - Incubator Buildings

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 3,447 - 220 4,000
610104 Water 6,691 6,469 7,700 8,300
610129 Other Expense - 963 200 1,000
630101 Building Maintenance 8,862 9,318 12,600 12,000
Total Material & Services: $ 19,000 16,750 20,720 25,300 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 1202 - Public Information Office: $ 19,000 16,750 20,720 25,300

4.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1901 - Non-Departmental

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 87,567 $ 85,006 $ 87,400 $ 90,000
610102 Natural Gas 185 3,588 900 2,000
610103 Telephone 6,992 7,726 10,500 10,000
610106 Advertising 561 188 - 800
610113 Professional Fees / Other 133,019 77,085 210,000 400,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 25,943 21,200 23,101 25,000 610126 Chamber of Commerce 3,000 6,000 3,000 3,000
610127 Housing Authority 61,663 62,434 66,700 70,000
610129 Other Expnese 221,702 188,141 230,000 400,000
610142 Sales Tax Rebate 140,068 141,817 115,600 120,000 620101 Office Supplies - 121 - -
620102 Postage 15,000 20,639 15,500 15,000
620103 Printing 6,948 12,982 6,500 10,000
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 1,649 2,833 2,000 3,000 640101 Property Insurance 218,119 255,515 334,048 384,126 640102 Liability Insurance 949,020 1,012,158 1,195,000 1,513,983 640112 Bank Charges 61,843 64,213 61,000 70,000
640119 Election Expense 394 27,538 550 15,000
Total Material & Services: $ 1,933,673 1,989,184 2,361,799 3,131,909 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ 12,608 - - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - 3,473 - -
730101 Passenger Vehicles - 3,298 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 12,608 6,771 - -
Total 1901 - Non-Departmental: 1,946,281 $ 1,995,955 2,361,799 3,131,909

4.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 1902 - Service Credits

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Vacancy Savings FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 XXXXXX Vacancy Savings - Miscellaneous $ - $ - $ - $ (508,629) XXXXXX Vacancy Savings - Police - - - (722,855)
XXXXXX Vacancy Savings - Fire - - - (470,909)
Total Vacancy Savings: $ - - (1,702,393) -
Overhead Transfers
810101 Overhead - Water Fund $ (1,058,755) (1,170,284) (1,254,608) (1,463,026) 610104 Overhead - Sewer Fund (985,785) (725,555) (1,199,762) (1,399,068) Total Overhead Transfers: $ (2,044,540) (1,895,839) (2,454,370) (2,862,094) Total 1902 - Service Credits: (2,044,540) $ (1,895,839) (2,454,370) (4,564,487)

4.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2101 - Police Services

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 582,095 $ 579,229 $ 609,199 $ 883,214 510102 Salaries - Sworn 3,424,731 3,688,613 4,057,510 4,873,102 510103 Salaries - Temporary 71,355 31,163 31,267 -
510105 Overtime 759,173 697,549 797,763 650,000
520101 Retirement 2,212,825 2,412,682 993,952 1,084,146 520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 1,505,141 1,956,185
520103 Social Security 4,659 2,151 - -
520104 Group Health Insurance 598,562 606,293 689,636 922,639 520105 Worker's Compensation 420,986 441,825 492,885 518,068 520106 Disability Insurance 18,185 18,706 20,376 33,323 520107 Unemployment Insurance 118,791 200,498 223,754 279,833 520109 Life Insurance 6,720 5,714 6,046 9,523
520110 Medicare 70,622 69,588 77,000 92,892
Total Personnel Services: $ 8,288,704 8,754,011 9,504,529 11,302,925 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 67,712 65,918 80,400 85,000
610102 Natural Gas 1,184 2,028 1,300 1,300
610103 Telephone 67,355 78,905 72,500 85,000
610106 Advertising - 6,276 4,000 10,000
610109 Meeting & Travel 2,911 1,482 13,000 2,400
610113 Professional Fees / Other 82,188 68,685 93,000 107,000 610114 Professional Fees / D 68,705 84,948 86,000 75,000 610120 Police Investigations 3,805 2,480 2,500 4,000
610121 Dues and Subscriptions 4,307 6,030 8,000 4,800
610123 Training (3,000) - 5,003 -
610124 Uniform Allowance 81,585 69,894 82,000 82,600
610129 Other Expense 15,425 16,702 16,500 17,500
610133 Crime Prevention 2,537 5,695 5,900 5,900
610141 Explorer Program 10,964 21,299 14,000 20,000
620101 Office Supplies 8,585 9,374 16,500 10,000
620102 Postage 5,008 3,677 3,800 5,000
620103 Printing 6,181 6,044 6,000 6,000
620105 Computer Supplies 14,988 6,884 8,000 12,000
620107 Photo & Video Supplies - 2,392 - 1,500
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 175 31 300 1,000
620110 Ammunition & Range Supplies 13,232 31,479 40,000 40,000 620112 Protective Clothing - - - 100
620114 Other Safety Supplies 6,046 19,472 13,000 13,000 620128 Janitorial Supplies 5,665 6,333 4,000 7,000
620140 Small Tools - - 300
620144 K-9 Supplies 16,318 67,625 32,500 35,000
620146 Reserve Volunteer Program 4,045 - - 15,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2101 - Police Services

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630101 Building Maintenance 25,284 21,811 27,600 25,000 630106 Office Machines Maintenance 5,211 4,846 5,100 5,600 630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 4,215 9,911 9,350 12,000 630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance - 23,567 - 5,000
630112 Gasoline & Oil 181,397 187,881 184,000 190,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 3,471 11,068 15,000 10,000
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 112,662 112,662 118,717 123,581 640112 Bank Charges - - 800 -
Total Material & Services: $ 818,161 955,399 968,770 1,017,581 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ 10,000 - - -
720101 Office Machines - 31,911 - -
720108 Safety Equipment - 23,003 - -
720109 Computers - - - -
730103 Public Safety Vehicles - - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 10,000 54,914 - -
Total 2101 - Police Services: 9,116,865 $ 9,764,324 10,473,299 12,320,506

4.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2102 - Communications

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 501,523 $ 541,984 $ 580,282 $ 667,698 510103 Salaries - Temporary - 3,950 - -
510105 Overtime 133,234 153,144 139,767 155,000
520101 Retirement 132,171 144,233 62,813 65,325
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 73,938 84,765
520104 Group Health Insurance 109,622 103,715 118,970 145,473 520105 Worker's Compensation 54,135 59,585 63,680 60,093 520106 Disability Insurance 2,763 2,899 3,118 4,027
520107 Unemployment Insurance 15,166 27,084 29,009 33,384 520109 Life Insurance 1,222 1,074 1,026 1,395
520110 Medicare 9,139 9,713 9,964 11,929
Total Personnel Services: $ 958,975 1,047,381 1,082,567 1,229,089 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 3,166 3,301 3,950 4,000
610107 Books & Periodicals - - - 750
610113 Professional Fees / Other 6,500 21,237 60,500 58,600 610123 Training 10,594 13,711 14,000 20,000
610124 Uniform Allowance 5,350 3,900 5,500 5,500
610129 Other Expense 73,585 86,629 94,400 2,000
620101 Office Supplies 1,669 1,652 - 1,000
630101 Building Maintenance 8,104 174 5,000 1,000
630106 Office Machines Maintenance - - - 1,000
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 56,975 53,667 54,300 63,000 Total Material & Services: $ 165,943 184,271 237,650 156,850 Capital Projects / Outlay
720111 Communication Equipment $ - 20,000 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 20,000 - -
Total 2102 - Communications: 1,124,918 $ 1,251,652 1,320,217 1,385,939

4.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2103 - Animal Control

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 74,555 $ 78,313 $ 55,013 $ 100,940 510105 Overtime 15,467 17,023 24,921 5,000
520101 Retirement 19,606 21,625 5,751 9,765
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 11,148 12,737
520104 Group Health Insurance 23,583 19,666 15,725 24,141 520105 Worker's Compensation 8,094 8,558 6,092 9,085
520106 Disability Insurance 440 462 329 623
520107 Unemployment Insurance 2,329 3,890 2,688 5,047
520109 Life Insurance 226 173 102 224
520110 Medicare 1,312 1,288 1,087 1,536
Total Personnel Services: $ 145,612 150,998 122,856 169,098 Materials & Services
610121 Dues & Subscriptions $ - 100 - 200
610123 Training 154 410 - 2,000
610124 Uniform Allowance 2,070 1,530 1,350 1,800
610129 Other Expense 9,384 4,827 8,300 15,000
620103 Printing 219 - - 1,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies - - - 900
630101 Building Maintenance 275 18 500 1,500
630112 Gasoline & Oil 5,364 6,014 4,100 5,500
630115 Outside Maintenance - - - 1,900
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 8,189 8,189 8,629 8,983
Total Material & Services: $ 25,655 21,088 22,879 38,783 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2103 - Animal Control: $ 171,267 172,086 145,735 207,881

4.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2105 - POST

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610123 Training $ 60,537 92,097 90,000 115,000
Total Material & Services: $ 60,537 92,097 90,000 115,000 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2105 - POST: $ 60,537 92,097 90,000 115,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2301 - Fire Services

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 121,341 $ 142,671 $ 149,696 $ 160,074 510102 Salaries - Sworn 2,793,082 3,165,734 3,121,380 3,917,608 510105 Overtime 977,877 875,648 1,095,629 600,000
520101 Retirement 1,704,681 1,977,954 773,664 857,419
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 1,227,024 1,532,780
520104 Group Health Insurance 399,376 417,978 432,430 575,711 520105 Worker's Compensation 311,150 355,910 351,981 366,991 520106 Disability Insurance 7,292 8,091 8,254 23,643
520107 Unemployment Insurance 88,893 161,777 160,219 201,055 520109 Life Insurance 5,108 4,509 3,451 5,693
520110 Medicare 55,076 57,999 58,246 67,826
Total Personnel Services: $ 6,463,876 7,168,271 7,381,974 8,308,800 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 67,315 65,859 76,500 100,000
610102 Natural Gas 5,600 6,354 5,600 6,000
610103 Telephone 24,431 26,010 28,000 28,000
610107 Books & Periodicals 167 - - 475
610109 Meeting & Travel 1,091 780 500 950
610111 Equipment Rental - - 1,000 200
610113 Professional Fees / Other 35,100 37,413 60,000 60,454 610121 Dues and Subscriptions 3,497 4,677 3,000 7,225
610123 Training - 558 1,421 475
610124 Uniform Allowance 73,073 45,862 61,500 61,500
610129 Other Expense 12,608 8,475 7,500 10,000
620101 Office Supplies 1,652 2,430 1,500 2,500
620102 Postage 732 398 650 650
620103 Printing 619 869 300 760
620104 Blueprinting & Drafting 52 - 220 95
620105 Computer Supplies 1,331 1,071 1,500 1,500
620106 Lab Supplies - - - 95
620107 Photo & Video Supplies 45 139 130 95
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 626 113 500 1,000
620111 Paramedic Supplies - - 2,211 95
620112 Protective Clothing 29,997 28,342 30,000 38,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies 1,681 372 500 2,000
620128 Janitorial Supplies 5,580 10,517 9,500 9,000
620129 Laundry Service & Maintenance 6,115 6,619 6,500 6,500 620130 Maintenance Supplies 690 457 950 950
620135 Other Supplies 1,309 1,002 1,700 1,200
620140 Small Tools 133 175 95 95
630101 Building Maintenance 30,139 89,834 40,000 45,000 630103 Ground / Landscaping 423 380 667 500

4.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2301 - Fire Services

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 1,385 1,434 1,400 2,000 630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 41,039 43,232 43,000 43,000 630108 Field / Shop Equipment Maintenance 9,179 13,788 16,000 15,500 630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance 396 113 420 400
630110 Breathing Apparatus 11,630 13,751 10,000 14,000
630112 Gasoline & Oil 74,726 79,562 65,000 75,000
630113 Tires & Batteries 8,166 12,872 11,000 14,000
630114 Parts 2,024 4,466 6,000 6,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 91,004 114,492 85,000 95,000 630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 15,307 15,307 16,130 16,791 Total Material & Services: $ 558,862 637,723 595,894 667,005 Capital Projects / Outlay
710105 Buildings $ - - 10,815 -
710106 Other Real Property - 4,245 12,150 -
720101 Office Machines - 40,825 - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures 6,422 - 2,273 -
720106 Field Equipment 7,001 17,307 - -
720109 Computers 4,404 - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 17,827 62,377 25,238 - Total 2301 - Fire Services: 7,040,565 $ 7,868,371 8,003,106 8,975,805

4.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2303 - Prevention

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610107 Books & Periodicals $ 434 $ - $ 700 $ 5,317
610109 Meeting & Travel 128 - - 95
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 2,026 2,202 2,500 4,191
610123 Training 5,261 - 3,700 3,000
610129 Other Expense 354 5,857 6,750 8,000
620101 Office Supplies 376 1,564 150 800
620103 Printing 296 974 500 475
620105 Computer Supplies - 330 475 475
620107 Photo & Video Supplies - 95 95 95
630106 Office Machines Maintenance - - - -
Total Material & Services: $ 8,875 11,022 14,870 22,448 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2303 - Prevention: $ 8,875 11,022 14,870 22,448

4.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2304 - Emergency Medic

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610111 Equipment Rental $ 2,584 $ 2,939 $ 2,650 $ 2,650 610113 Professional Fees / Other 1,475 2,597 1,500 3,650 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 4,546 5,255 5,350 5,428
610123 Training 33 - 1,000 1,000
610129 Other Expense - 232 - 95
620103 Printing - - 240 95
620106 Lab Supplies - - - 95
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 287 1,127 250 1,000
620109 First Aid Supplies 715 1,852 3,000 3,000
620111 Paramedic Supplies 33,758 38,657 35,000 48,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies - 1,763 475 475
630108 Field / Shop Equipment Maintenance 6,310 12,314 2,500 10,000 Total Material & Services: $ 49,708 66,736 51,965 75,488 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2304 - Emergency Medic: $ 49,708 66,736 51,965 75,488

4.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2305 - Training

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610107 Books & Periodicals $ 446 $ 53 $ - $ 950
610121 Dues & Subscriptions - - 250 660
610123 Training 6,282 16,508 16,746 16,500
620102 Computer Supplies - 188 - 240
620107 Photo & Video Supplies 194 475 - 475
Total Material & Services: $ 6,922 17,224 16,996 18,825 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2305 - Training: $ 6,922 17,224 16,996 18,825

4.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 2306 - Hazardous Materials

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610107 Books & Periodicals $ - $ - $ 200 $ 200
610123 Training 1,270 407 1,500 1,900
610132 Medical Services 9,450 10,200 20,000 13,000
620105 Computer Supplies 29 85 - 100
620106 Lab Supplies - - - 200
620112 Protective Clothing - - - 200
620114 Other Safety Supplies - - - 240
630111 Other Facility Maintenance - 31,876 - 200
Total Material & Services: $ 10,749 42,568 21,700 16,040 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 2306 - Hazardous Materials: $ 10,749 42,568 21,700 16,040

4.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3101 - Public Works Administration

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 56,341 $ 66,536 $ 77,772 $ 83,755 510105 Overtime - 277 100 500
520101 Retirement 13,082 17,334 7,760 8,193
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 9,082 10,463
520104 Group Health Insurance 7,091 9,505 13,094 13,995 520105 Worker's Compensation 5,999 7,056 8,433 7,486
520106 Disability Insurance 252 287 354 515
520107 Unemployment Insurance 1,704 3,208 3,834 4,158
520109 Life Insurance 100 96 109 129
520110 Medicare 835 939 1,091 1,214
Total Personnel Services: $ 85,404 105,238 121,629 130,408 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 2,430 3,616 3,900 3,300
610106 Advertising - - - 700
610108 Auto Reimbursement - 50 50 100
610109 Meeting & Travel 681 1,400 650 1,500
610113 Professional Fees / Other 281 292 250 600
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 145 390 350 1,500
610123 Training 200 593 450 1,000
610129 Other Expense 168 33,935 32,850 1,500
620101 Office Supplies 1,534 1,598 1,600 1,900
620102 Postage 58 - - -
620103 Printing 227 105 150 350
620105 Computer Supplies 421 182 250 1,000
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film - - - -
620109 First Aid Supplies - - - 100
620114 Other Safety Supplies - 100 100 100
620128 Janitorial Supplies - - - 2,000
630101 Building Maintenance - - - 1,000
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 170 180 500 300
630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance 134 200 - 200
630112 Gasoline & Oil - - - 500
Total Material & Services: $ 6,449 42,641 41,100 17,650

4.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3101 - Public Works Administration

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Mahcines $ - 705 - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - 347 - -
720109 Computers 3,257 974 300 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 3,257 2,026 300 -
Total 3101 - Public Works Administration: $ 95,110 149,905 163,029 148,058

4.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3201 - Streets Maintenance

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 358,518 $ 421,836 $ 494,158 $ 539,421 510103 Salaries - Temporary 949 - 372 -
510105 Overtime 34,282 45,777 46,478 40,000
510107 Overtime - Signal Lights 1,253 - - -
520101 Retirement 94,462 120,188 47,699 53,133
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 65,810 75,515
520103 Social Security 59 - - -
520104 Group Health Insurance 74,276 91,699 103,011 115,399 520105 Worker's Compensation 38,046 44,068 52,222 48,548 520106 Disability Insurance 2,094 2,367 2,786 3,413
520107 Unemployment Insurance 10,866 19,125 23,413 26,971 520109 Life Insurance 820 776 844 1,161
520110 Medicare 5,577 6,344 7,394 8,402
Total Personnel Services: $ 621,202 752,180 844,187 911,963 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 5,574 6,236 6,850 7,500
610103 Telephone 3,110 3,798 4,450 4,500
610107 Books & Periodicals - - - -
610109 Meeting & Travel 897 753 250 1,000
610111 Equipment Rental 120 1,425 2,100 670
610113 Professional Fees / Other 24,535 31,741 25,000 29,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions - 49 100 -
610123 Training 505 327 3,000 1,500
610125 Uniform Rental 2,355 2,229 3,500 3,500
610129 Other Expense 4,390 14,839 4,000 6,000
620101 Office Supplies 2,416 1,798 1,850 3,000
620103 Printing 223 368 250 300
620105 Computer Supplies 320 472 250 475
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 125 245 100 -
620109 First Aid Supplies 238 548 - 450
620112 Protective Clothing 1,272 4,269 6,400 6,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies 1,385 814 4,500 4,000
620119 Traffic Paint 8,620 10,970 8,100 10,500
620120 Street Construction 82,696 82,878 44,500 70,000
620121 Traffic Sign - HDW 12,901 24,498 17,000 25,000
620126 Traffic Signals 17,981 21,361 40,000 30,000
620128 Janitorial Supplies 1,041 891 1,100 -
620140 Small Tools 4,349 9,904 8,000 8,000
630101 Building Maintenance 1,050 1,050 1,050 1,050
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 39 - 50 -
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 3,370 3,612 4,200 4,000 630108 Field / Shop Maintenance 613 1,014 1,700 1,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3201 - Streets Maintenance

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630109 Computer Equipment Maintenance 321 - - 500
630112 Gasoline & Oil 32,242 37,454 38,300 35,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 656 405 500 1,000
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 85,461 85,461 90,054 93,744 Total Material & Services: $ 298,805 349,409 317,154 348,189 Capital Projects / Outlay
720109 Computers $ - - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 3201 - Streets Maintenance: $ 920,007 1,101,589 1,161,341 1,260,152

4.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3203 - Street Lighting

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 409,972 $ 421,914 $ 420,000 $ 500,000 Total Material & Services: $ 409,972 421,914 420,000 500,000 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 3203 - Street Lighting: $ 409,972 421,914 420,000 500,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 3901 - IVRMA

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610129 Other Expense $ 75,345 $ 83,077 $ 95,778 $ 95,000 Total Material & Services: $ 75,345 83,077 95,778 95,000 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 3901 - IVRMA: $ 75,345 83,077 95,778 95,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4101 - Building Regulation

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 354,682 $ 386,402 $ 427,601 $ 539,936 510103 Salaries - Temporary - - - 9,000
510105 Overtime 956 5,373 7,887 5,000
520101 Retirement 91,517 100,699 42,643 53,006
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 55,976 64,142
520103 Social Security - - - 558
520104 Group Health Insurance 56,946 63,362 63,803 91,143 520105 Worker's Compensation 38,052 41,608 46,272 48,432 520106 Disability Insurance 1,706 1,879 2,067 3,390
520107 Unemployment Insurance 10,234 18,912 21,073 26,907 520109 Life Insurance 729 637 662 1,019
520110 Medicare 5,106 5,267 5,884 7,829
Total Personnel Services: $ 559,928 624,139 673,868 850,362 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 3,278 3,054 3,900 5,000
610107 Books & Periodicals - 1,572 - 2,000
610109 Meeting & Travel 61 2,300 3,000 4,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 35,927 36,892 34,000 38,500 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 4,706 2,760 3,800 3,500
610123 Training 2,846 4,772 9,360 8,000
610124 Uniform Allowance 90 210 - 900
610129 Other Expense 2,939 4,097 6,000 3,000
620101 Office Supplies 7,414 5,356 5,000 5,000
620102 Postage 1,940 4,346 1,000 2,000
620103 Printing 659 1,369 700 700
620105 Computer Supplies - 76 800 750
620112 Protective Clothing 374 873 900 1,500
620114 Other Safety Supplies 196 100 - 400
620140 Small Tools 163 - - 300
630106 Office Machine Maintennace - - 570 1,100
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 1,368 1,112 1,650 1,600 630112 Gasoline & Oil 7,655 5,639 6,300 6,500
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 7,992 7,992 8,421 8,766
Total Material & Services: $ 77,608 82,520 85,401 93,516

4.a
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4101 - Building Regulation

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ 790 - - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - 5,571 - -
720109 Computers - 5,306 8,900 -
720111 Communication Equipment - 3,902 7,200 -
730102 Trucks - - 39,810 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 790 14,779 55,910 -
Total 4101 - Building Regulation: $ 638,326 721,438 815,179 943,878

4.a
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4301 - Engineering

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 259,764 $ 278,905 $ 252,779 $ 301,169 510103 Salaries - Temporary 27,766 15,660 - -
510105 Overtime 731 - 500 500
520101 Retirement 64,155 68,021 25,006 29,545
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 34,954 40,032
520103 Social Security 980 - - -
520104 Group Health Insurance 30,752 36,973 38,233 45,920 520105 Worker's Compensation 31,234 29,189 23,008 26,995 520106 Disability Insurance 1,311 1,222 1,169 1,862
520107 Unemployment Insurance 8,980 14,131 12,531 14,996 520109 Life Insurance 557 452 373 535
520110 Medicare 3,745 4,092 3,566 4,367
Total Personnel Services: $ 429,975 448,645 392,119 465,921 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,393 1,246 1,300 1,300
610107 Books & Periodicals 393 163 650 750
610108 Auto Reimbursement - - - 200
610109 Meeting & Travel 1,475 922 2,100 3,200
610113 Professional Fees / Other 12,667 6,815 21,000 28,500 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 462 180 180 1,000
610123 Training 625 1,965 1,000 2,000
610129 Other Expense 2,308 2,170 3,400 3,400
620101 Office Supplies 2,449 2,131 2,881 2,900
620102 Postage 7 - 186 200
620103 Printing 360 317 1,075 1,100
620105 Computer Supplies 1,067 248 - 1,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies 1,632 1,271 1,100 1,500
620140 Small Tools 19 64 200 400
630106 Office Machines Maintenance 4,534 4,667 4,300 4,800 630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 1,453 1,368 1,900 1,800 630112 Gasoline & Oil 941 1,672 1,800 1,600
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 4,826 4,826 5,085 5,294
Total Material & Services: $ 36,611 30,025 48,157 60,944

4.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4301 - Engineering

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ - - - -
720109 Computers 6,958 - 2,912 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 6,958 - 2,912 -
Total 4301 - Engineering: $ 473,544 478,670 443,188 526,865

4.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4401 - Planning

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 200,197 $ 172,673 $ 237,779 $ 264,728 510105 Overtime 595 1,814 500 2,000
520101 Retirement 54,003 54,214 23,682 25,898
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 29,024 33,360
520104 Group Health Insurance 17,607 16,795 32,202 33,691 520105 Worker's Compensation 20,963 17,928 25,848 23,664 520106 Disability Insurance 971 808 1,203 1,633
520107 Unemployment Insurance 5,764 8,150 11,761 13,146 520109 Life Insurance 460 304 408 520
520110 Medicare 3,078 2,462 3,332 3,868
Total Personnel Services: $ 303,638 275,148 365,739 402,508 Materials & Services
610103 Telephone $ 1,326 1,735 1,400 1,900
610106 Advertising 6,074 8,085 6,000 8,500
610109 Meeting & Travel 320 2,907 2,000 65,250
610113 Professional Fees / Other 137,681 69,763 200,000 289,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 813 1,253 1,900 2,470
610123 Training 525 620 2,500 2,000
610129 Other Expense 209 535 1,550 1,650
620101 Office Supplies 6,390 4,078 2,300 2,850
620103 Printing 413 174 500 760
Total Material & Services: $ 153,751 89,150 218,150 374,380 Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ 787 - 9,765 -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - 9,020 - -
720109 Computers 2,419 - 5,441 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 3,206 9,020 15,206 - Total 4401 - Planning: $ 460,595 373,318 599,095 776,888

4.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 4402 - Planning EIRs

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610113 Professional Fees / Other $ 49,694 183,605 67,100 70,000 Total Material & Services: $ 49,694 183,605 67,100 70,000 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 4402 - Planning EIRs: $ 49,694 183,605 67,100 70,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5101 - Parks

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 399,845 $ 386,987 $ 451,186 $ 508,016 510103 Salaries - Temporary 32,841 47,706 42,792 40,500 510105 Overtime 8,044 10,346 22,333 15,000
520101 Retirement 98,192 109,644 46,753 49,945
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 56,202 64,445
520103 Social Security 835 1,160 3,131 2,511
520104 Group Health Insurance 56,930 63,255 77,521 105,461 520105 Worker's Compensation 45,795 45,580 52,788 45,635 520106 Disability Insurance 2,146 2,061 2,467 3,208
520107 Unemployment Insurance 12,841 20,756 23,950 25,353 520109 Life Insurance 912 705 791 1,149
520110 Medicare 6,397 6,163 7,211 7,584
Total Personnel Services: $ 664,778 694,363 787,125 868,807 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 45,233 59,975 77,580 70,000
610103 Telephone 4,766 5,309 4,500 6,000
610106 Advertising - 869 - 3,000
610109 Meeting & Travel - 5,799 2,750 5,000
610111 Equipment Rental 8,575 10,727 14,000 13,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 386,241 489,381 574,200 600,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 120 1,300 2,000 2,000
610123 Training 558 3,635 500 2,000
610125 Uniform Rental 1,812 1,962 2,500 2,500
610129 Other Expense 782 634 1,250 2,000
620101 Office Supplies 590 477 1,000 1,000
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 108 236 240 500
620109 First Aid Supplies - - 300 300
620112 Protective Clothing 2,906 4,153 4,500 4,500
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 8,827 4,616 1,000 8,000
620116 Playground Supplies 12 - 3,624 4,000
620123 Irrigation & Sprinklers 23,932 39,832 46,325 40,000 620124 Trees / Plants / Grass 5,833 13,414 16,615 17,000 620125 Chemicals / Fertilizer 6,975 6,697 12,000 10,000 620128 Janitorial Supplies 2,900 5,840 8,200 4,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 25,773 17,201 18,900 23,000 620131 Painting Supplies 2,722 3,608 7,300 6,000
620132 Construction Materials 13,570 14,035 14,000 14,000 620140 Small Tools 4,168 1,709 4,600 4,000
630101 Building Maintenance 3,546 3,671 2,500 3,800
630105 Other Maintenance 4,800 4,795 300 5,000
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 2,394 2,659 2,500 3,000 630108 Field / Shop Maintenance 5,022 2,982 5,500 6,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5101 - Parks

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630112 Gasoline & Oil 31,558 33,064 33,000 34,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 31,426 26,757 20,800 20,000
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 29,966 29,966 31,576 32,870 Total Material & Services: $ 655,115 795,303 914,060 946,470 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ 17,912 267,905 226,029 -
720106 Field Equipment - 12,882 - -
730102 Trucks - 46,218 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 17,912 327,005 226,029 - Total 5101 - Parks: 1,337,805 $ 1,816,671 1,927,214 1,815,277

4.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5201 - Recreation

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 129,527 $ 153,250 $ 144,520 $ 162,993 510103 Salaries - Temporary 33,944 97,063 120,288 112,500 510105 Overtime 2,194 10,241 10,099 10,000
520101 Retirement 33,055 39,270 19,349 15,960
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 19,446 22,291
520103 Social Security 1,257 4,241 4,466 6,975
520104 Group Health Insurance 20,130 25,563 38,629 38,822 520105 Worker's Compensation 17,544 27,038 28,743 14,583 520106 Disability Insurance 640 752 724 998
520107 Unemployment Insurance 5,032 12,328 13,088 8,102 520109 Life Insurance 331 289 245 301
520110 Medicare 1,814 3,072 3,408 4,140
Total Personnel Services: $ 245,468 373,107 403,005 397,665 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 79,856 78,494 79,000 75,000
610103 Telephone 1,179 1,801 2,000 2,000
610108 Auto Reimbursement - - - 300
610109 Meeting & Travel 2,195 3,515 2,500 6,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 9,459 12,000 15,000 15,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 1,268 1,901 2,500 3,000
610123 Training - 1,512 750 2,000
610125 Uniform Rental 713 486 950 1,000
610129 Other Expense 3,111 5,297 6,000 7,000
620101 Office Supplies 2,547 2,521 2,000 2,500
620102 Postage 115 15 - 300
620103 Printing 5,284 6,982 7,000 7,000
620105 Computer Supplies 52 339 1,000 1,000
620109 First Aid Supplies - - 250 500
620112 Protective Clothing 575 189 250 1,000
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 2,415 4,010 4,500 6,000
620128 Janitorial Supplies 1,544 1,930 2,000 2,500
620130 Maintenance Supplies 1,223 1,504 2,700 2,000
620131 Painting Supplies - 358 1,000 1,000
630101 Building Maintenance 899 227 1,500 1,500
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 1,026 1,710 2,000 2,100 630112 Gasoline & Oil 9,647 11,202 10,000 11,000
630115 Outside Maintenance - 769 1,000 1,000
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 3,200 3,210 3,372 3,510
Total Material & Services: $ 126,308 139,972 147,272 154,210

4.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5201 - Recreation

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 5201 - Recreation: $ 371,776 513,079 550,277 551,875

4.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5202 - Community Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 65,903 $ 68,497 $ 61,259 $ 64,411 510103 Salaries - Temporary 43,214 71,270 46,269 90,000 510105 Overtime 610 2,817 4,878 4,000
520101 Retirement 18,307 22,665 10,789 6,344
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 8,410 9,705
520103 Social Security 616 112 - -
520104 Group Health Insurance 11,288 11,561 14,702 15,334 520105 Worker's Compensation 11,662 15,265 11,678 5,797 520106 Disability Insurance 325 343 301 397
520107 Unemployment Insurance 3,326 6,939 5,310 3,221
520109 Life Insurance 150 129 99 99
520110 Medicare 1,033 1,442 1,138 2,297
Total Personnel Services: $ 156,434 201,040 164,833 201,605 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 54,441 60,842 65,120 75,000
610102 Natural Gas 652 2,227 1,110 1,200
610103 Telephone 4,554 5,098 5,270 6,000
610109 Meeting & Travel 72 1,244 600 2,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 22,685 33,023 30,000 42,500 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 15 76 500 750
610123 Training - 615 - 800
610125 Uniform Rental - 569 276 -
610129 Other Expense 3,450 3,574 4,100 4,500
620101 Office Supplies 2,558 2,098 3,000 3,000
620102 Postage - - - 50
620105 Computer Supplies 105 258 1,416 500
620112 Protective Clothing - 63 300 500
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 1,834 2,546 2,000 40,000 620122 Grounds Landscaping - - - 200
620123 Irrigation & Sprinklers - 81 - 300
620124 Trees / Plants / Grass - - - 300
620128 Janitorial Supplies 4,412 6,050 5,500 6,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 336 477 838 1,000
620131 Painting Supplies - 100 500 1,000
620140 Small Tools - - - 500
630101 Building Maintenance 2,557 2,929 4,156 3,500
630102 Furniture / Fixtures Maintenance - - 1,898 500
630106 Office Machines Maintenance - - - 100
630112 Gasoline & Oil 1,116 1,307 1,700 2,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5202 - Community Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630115 Outside Maintenance - 24 550 500
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 2,277 2,277 2,400 2,498
Total Material & Services: $ 101,064 125,478 131,234 195,198 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ - 15,579 - -
720101 Office Machines - 7,075 13,220 -
720109 Computers - - 2,660 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 22,654 15,880 -
Total 5202 - Community Center: $ 257,498 349,172 311,947 396,803

4.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5203 - PO Pavillion

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ - $ - $ 616 $ -
510103 Salaries - Temporary 690 - 18,000
510105 Overtime - - - -
520101 Retirement - 31 38 2,260
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - -
520103 Social Security - 21 15 558
520104 Group Health Insurance - 11 60 360
520105 Worker's Compensation - 76 68 1,980
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520107 Unemployment Insurance - 35 31 900
520109 Life Insurance - - - -
520110 Medicare - 10 9 261
Total Personnel Services: $ - 874 837 24,319
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 17,450 20,442 22,700 28,000
610102 Natural Gas 180 163 201 250
610103 Telephone 168 193 250 250
610113 Professional Fees / Other 6,468 15,000 15,000 15,000 610129 Other Expense 3,000 742 3,500 3,000
620101 Office Supplies - 181 - 200
620103 Printing - - - 200
620105 Computer Supplies - - - 240
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 257 4,029 - 475
620122 Grounds Landscaping - - - 475
620123 Irrigation & Sprinklers - 135 100 285
620124 Trees / Plants / Grass - - - 285
620128 Janitorial Supplies 247 2,941 1,900 1,900
630101 Building Maintenance 1,830 3,738 3,500 3,500
Total Material & Services: $ 29,600 47,564 47,151 54,060 Capital Projects / Outlay
710106 Other Real Property $ 44,400 - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 44,400 - - -
Total 5203 - PO Pavillion: $ 74,000 48,438 47,988 78,379

4.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5204 - Youth Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ - $ 4,940 $ 38,672 $ 63,870 510103 Salaries - Temporary 48,747 60,409 41,969 90,000 510105 Overtime 55 - 1,300 1,000
520101 Retirement 1,337 7,231 4,492 6,291
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 4,798 5,459
520103 Social Security (FICA) 2,117 3,098 2,360 5,580
520104 Group Health Insurance 866 1,639 9,124 16,598
520105 Worker's Compensation 5,362 7,188 9,073 5,748
520106 Disability Insurance - 31 251 406
520107 Unemployment Insurance 1,796 3,268 4,070 3,194
520109 Life Insurance - 9 92 168
520110 Medicare 709 947 1,194 2,246
Total Personnel Services: $ 60,989 88,760 117,395 200,560 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 38,688 35,780 41,640 50,000
610106 Advertising 100 515 - 600
610109 Meeting & Travel - - 2,114 2,500
610111 Equipment Rental 300 450 600 1,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 5,280 6,018 10,090 8,369 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 615 689 900 700
610123 Training - 250 250 1,000
610129 Other Expenses - - - 1,000
620101 Office Supplies 547 430 300 500
620103 Printing 897 1,556 1,500 1,500
620105 Computer Supplies 360 436 475 475
620108 Flares / Batteries / Film 144 150 50 150
620109 First Aid Supplies 53 160 - 300
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 2,709 2,757 5,000 3,500
620128 Janitorial Supplies 2,044 2,078 1,500 2,500
620130 Maintenance Supplies 1,656 930 950 950
620131 Painting Supplies 566 444 150 500
630101 Building Maintenance 9,550 7,913 6,500 9,000
630106 Office Machines Maintenance - - - -
630107 Communications Eqpt Mtc - - - 1,520
630112 Gasoline & Oil 733 969 2,500 1,000
Total Material & Services: $ 64,242 61,525 74,519 87,064

4.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5204 - Youth Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
710105 Buildings $ - - 5,147 -
720101 Office Machines - 7,273 - -
720111 Computer Equipment - - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 7,273 5,147 -
Total 5204 - Youth Center: $ 125,231 157,558 197,061 287,624

4.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5205 - Adult Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 28,865 $ 39,375 $ 52,883 $ 57,638 510103 Salaries - Temporary 22,614 26,200 27,384 27,000 510105 Overtime 442 814 3,053 2,000
520101 Retirement 10,126 11,874 10,967 5,677
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - 6,672
520103 Social Security (FICA) - 12 - 1,674
520104 Group Health Insurance 13,637 21,424 28,116 21,249 520105 Worker's Compensation 5,638 7,213 8,625 5,187
520106 Disability Insurance 182 245 305 347
520107 Unemployment Insurance 1,704 3,279 3,920 2,882
520109 Life Insurance 91 93 90 141
520110 Medicare 751 872 1,102 1,227
Total Personnel Services: $ 84,050 111,401 136,445 131,694 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 984 933 900 1,000
610102 Natrual Gas 444 519 410 500
610103 Telephone 638 1,167 1,200 1,400
610106 Advertising - 1,200 1,200 1,500
610109 Meeting & Travel - 1,993 2,200 2,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 18,454 17,992 20,000 20,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 174 227 580 1,000
610123 Training - 775 300 1,000
610129 Other Expense 3,190 7,951 5,400 7,000
620101 Office Supplies 557 1,044 1,000 1,300
620102 Postage - 11 - 100
620103 Printing 844 748 1,000 1,000
620105 Computer Supplies 219 (130) 500 500
620109 First Aid Supplies 67 - 110 100
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 1,874 2,586 3,052 3,500
620124 Trees / Plants/ Grass 71 - - 300
620128 Janitorial Supplies 1,971 1,985 2,500 2,500
620129 Laundry Service & Supply - 276 1,000 500
620130 Maintenance Supplies 197 345 500 1,000
620131 Painting Supplies 125 95 500 500
630101 Building Maintenance 449 3,548 3,233 2,500
630102 Furniture & Fixtures 897 - 4,536 300
Total Material & Services: $ 31,155 43,265 50,121 49,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5205 - Adult Center

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
720109 Computers $ - - 24,501 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - 24,501 -
Total 5205 - Adult Center: $ 115,205 154,666 211,067 181,194

4.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5206 - Aquatic Park

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 232,882 $ 249,659 $ 280,327 $ 297,012 510103 Salaries - Temporary 298,622 338,254 445,486 337,500 510105 Overtime 6,638 8,408 6,445 5,000
520101 Retirement 61,718 70,287 34,031 29,256
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 33,790 38,819
520103 Social Security (FICA) 16,202 15,548 22,544 21,094 520104 Group Health Insurance 39,820 40,407 39,061 54,445 520105 Worker's Compensation 57,576 64,022 77,009 26,731 520106 Disability Insurance 1,280 1,269 1,081 1,882
520107 Unemployment Insurance 16,904 28,665 34,466 14,850 520109 Life Insurance 575 545 461 611
520110 Medicare 8,181 8,506 10,470 9,273
Total Personnel Services: $ 740,398 825,570 985,171 836,473 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 65,016 66,463 80,750 80,000
610102 Natrual Gas 50,390 79,489 51,230 35,000
610103 Telephone 6,768 6,833 5,500 6,000
610106 Advertising 15,031 20,615 18,000 20,000
610109 Meeting & Travel 5,154 6,172 7,000 9,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 39,429 46,155 76,000 65,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 5,151 6,017 5,500 7,780
610123 Training 2,013 7,305 5,050 6,000
610125 Uniform Rental 886 1,318 1,500 1,500
610129 Other Expense 28,703 17,000 21,400 23,000
620101 Office Supplies 2,446 5,500 5,000 5,000
620103 Printing 2,864 2,533 3,000 4,000
620105 Computer Supplies 410 - 600 600
620106 Lab Supplies 1,442 4,550 1,000 2,000
620109 First Aid Supplies 3,075 3,000 1,500 3,000
620112 Protective Clothing 5,000 3,956 6,500 6,000
620114 Other Safety Supplies 4,066 5,439 3,500 4,000
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 4,679 1,831 5,000 5,000
620128 Janitorial Supplies 6,426 6,361 6,000 7,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 2,207 5,748 2,000 2,500
620131 Painting Supplies - - - 2,000
620133 Swimming Pool Supplies 16,789 33,032 21,000 60,000 620136 Treatment Chemicals 104,699 113,478 110,000 140,000 630101 Building Maintenance 1,375 1,527 250 1,500
630107 Comm. Equipment Maintenance 154 1,124 1,000 1,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5206 - Aquatic Park

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630112 Gasoline & Oil - - 1,000 1,000
630115 Outside Maintenance 769 2,664 2,500 3,000
Total Material & Services: $ 374,942 448,110 441,780 500,880 Capital Projects / Outlay
720102 Furniture & Fixtures $ - - 2,210 -
720109 Computers - - 1,280 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - 3,490 -
Total 5206 - Aquatic Park: 1,115,340 $ 1,273,680 1,430,441 1,337,353

4.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5207 - Day Camp

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510103 Salaries - Temporary $ 50,646 $ 49,261 $ 20,473 $ 49,500 510105 Overtime 135 476 250 -
520101 Retirement 482 1,233 1,508 12,429
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - -
520103 Social Security (FICA) 2,820 2,222 344 -
520104 Group Health Insurance 742 579 143 719
520105 Worker's Compensation 5,571 5,419 2,261 5,445
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520107 Unemployment Insurance 1,829 2,463 1,024 2,475
520109 Life Insurance - - - -
520110 Medicare 737 721 301 718
Total Personnel Services: $ 62,962 62,374 26,304 71,286 Materials & Services
610129 Other Expense $ 2,701 2,500 13,300 3,000
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 5,133 4,000 11,800 5,000 Total Material & Services: $ 7,834 6,500 25,100 8,000
Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 5207 - Day Camp: $ 70,796 68,874 51,404 79,286

4.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5208 - Mini Bike

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510103 Salaries - Temporary $ 2,627 $ 5,015 $ 5,571 $ 9,000 510105 Overtime 42 - - -
520101 Retirement 229 265 - 1,130
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - -
520103 Social Security (FICA) 10 129 358 279
520104 Group Health Insurance 46 40 55 360
520105 Worker's Compensation 289 552 622 990
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520107 Unemployment Insurance 128 251 278 450
520109 Life Insurance - - 82 -
520110 Medicare 39 72 48 131
Total Personnel Services: $ 3,410 6,324 7,014 12,340
Materials & Services
610109 Meeting & Travel - - - 500
610113 Professional Fees / Other 4,397 494 520 1,000
610121 Dues & Subscriptions - 2,074 - 1,700
610123 Training - 84 - 1,000
610129 Other Expense 7,584 4,716 2,750 3,000
620101 Office Supplies 86 600 - 200
620103 Printing - 300 - 300
620105 Computer Supplies - 249 - -
620109 First Aid Supplies - 100 - 150
620112 Protective Clothing - 1,289 1,500 1,500
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 6,136 16,772 13,000 1,500 620140 Small Tools 200 87 200 200
630112 Gasoline & Oil 63 - 500 500
Total Material & Services: $ 18,466 26,765 18,470 11,550 Capital Projects / Outlay
720102 Furniture & Fixtures $ - - - -
720109 Computers 740 - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 740 - - -
Total 5208 - Mini Bike: $ 22,616 33,089 25,484 23,890

4.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5211 - MLK Sports Court

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 53,697 $ 61,542 $ 63,320 $ 86,510 510103 Salaries - Temporary 156,377 212,255 178,788 180,000 510105 Overtime 1,913 5,682 3,556 2,000
520101 Retirement 21,743 26,639 20,885 8,521
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - 8,795
520103 Social Security (FICA) 3,836 4,802 4,417 11,160
520104 Group Health Insurance 11,135 11,276 10,544 24,141 520105 Worker's Compensation 22,938 29,916 26,337 7,786 520106 Disability Insurance 310 331 342 719
520107 Unemployment Insurance 6,987 13,598 12,084 5,754 520109 Life Insurance 111 97 91 224
520110 Medicare 3,225 4,016 3,490 3,893
Total Personnel Services: $ 282,272 370,154 323,854 339,503 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 49,902 54,279 53,200 60,000
610102 Natrual Gas 484 593 450 500
610103 Telephone 1,662 1,635 1,600 2,000
610106 Advertising 60 150 25 150
610109 Meeting & Travel - 4,378 2,150 3,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 26,083 7,598 4,500 8,500 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 890 984 850 1,000
610123 Training - 255 - 250
610125 Uniform Rental 265 731 260 300
610129 Other Expense 2,301 2,031 1,900 2,000
620101 Office Supplies 518 1,399 1,000 1,500
620102 Postage 27 90 - 100
620105 Computer Supplies 394 536 500 1,000
620112 Protective Clothing 186 535 500 400
620115 Athletic Field Supplies 6,003 7,400 3,000 5,000
620122 Grounds Landscaping - - 1,985 2,000
620123 Irrigation & Sprinklers 119 5 50 500
620124 Trees / Plants / Grass Seed 96 98 100 100
620128 Janitorial Supplies 2,337 4,187 3,000 4,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 1,122 825 800 1,000
620131 Painting Supplies 217 - 500 500
630101 Building Maintenance 2,538 1,721 1,750 3,000
630102 Furniture / Fixtures Maintenance 711 487 791 500 630107 Office Machines Maintenance - - - 475

4.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5211 - MLK Sports Court

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
630112 Gasoline / Oil 150 89 - 300
630115 Outside Maintenance - 66 150 1,500
Total Material & Services: $ 96,065 90,072 79,061 99,575 Capital Projects / Outlay
710105 Buildings $ - - 4,332 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - 4,332 -
Total 5211 - MLK Sports Court: $ 378,337 460,226 407,247 439,078

4.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5213 - Splash Pad

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610113 Professional Fees / Other $ 7,370 $ 10,818 $ 3,500 10,000 610123 Training - - - 1,400
610129 Other Expense 10,948 4,047 250 6,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies - 148 - 500
Total Material & Services: $ 18,318 15,013 3,750 17,900 Capital Projects / Outlay
720102 Furniture & Fixtures $ - - 7,076 -
720107 Parks & Recreation Equipment - - - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - 7,076 -
Total 5213 - Splash Pad: $ 18,318 15,013 10,826 17,900

4.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5214 - Skate Park

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510103 Salaries - Temporary $ 1,800 $ 1,864 $ - $ 4,500 510105 Overtime - 630 - 500
520101 Retirement 104 112 - 565
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - - -
520103 Social Security (FICA) 40 39 - 140
520104 Group Health Insurance 31 117 - 360
520105 Worker's Compensation 198 205 - 495
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520107 Unemployment Insurance 90 93 - 225
520109 Life Insurance - - - -
520110 Medicare 26 36 - 65
Total Personnel Services: $ 2,289 3,096 - 6,850
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 5,636 6,371 7,880 7,500
610113 Professional Fees / Other 26,324 37,433 31,600 50,000 620115 Athletic Field Supplies 134 1,155 - 1,000
620123 Irrigation & Sprinklers 90 128 300 300
620130 Minatenence Supplies 3,650 1,087 1,200 4,000
Total Material & Services: $ 35,834 46,174 40,980 62,800 Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 5214 - Skate Park: $ 38,123 49,270 40,980 69,650

4.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5301 - Library

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 219,311 $ 190,856 $ 423,372 $ 508,016 510103 Salaries - Temporary 80,647 106,108 69,870 81,000 510105 Overtime 59 239 - -
520101 Retirement 72,956 90,883 48,612 49,945
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 34,106 39,122
520103 Social Security (FICA) 60 226 469 5,022
520104 Group Health Insurance 40,493 32,338 62,076 105,461 520105 Worker's Compensation 32,597 32,322 54,064 45,635 520106 Disability Insurance 1,166 1,070 2,228 3,208
520107 Unemployment Insurance 9,264 14,692 24,464 25,353 520109 Life Insurance 533 418 865 1,149
520110 Medicare 3,217 3,583 6,964 8,541
Total Personnel Services: $ 460,303 472,735 727,090 872,452 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 20,175 51,079 62,500 70,000
610102 Natural Gas - 5,382 2,850 7,000
610103 Telephone 6,500 20,832 15,100 12,000
610106 Advertising - 156 2,700 3,000
610107 Books & Periodicals 54,762 36,413 50,000 55,000
610108 Auto Reimbursement 333 - - -
610109 Meeting & Travel 204 310 2,500 5,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 37,596 191,297 120,000 65,000 610121 Dues & Subscriptions 44,875 43,825 45,000 40,000 610123 Training - 1,000 2,276 2,000
610129 Other Expense 5,397 24,104 15,000 10,000
620101 Office Supplies 12,107 26,782 25,500 20,000
620102 Postage 44 1,120 1,400 1,500
620103 Printing 2,819 1,382 2,500 4,000
620105 Computer Supplies 685 2,019 660 400
620107 Photo & Video Supplies 2,838 - - -
620128 Janitorial Supplies 2,904 4,481 5,000 5,000
620130 Maintenance Supplies 302 1,014 500 1,000
630101 Building Maintenance 2,497 4,646 11,900 8,000
630106 Office Machines Maintenance - 2,021 10,015 2,000 640112 Bank Charges - 3,685 10,900 -
Total Material & Services: $ 194,038 421,548 386,301 310,900

4.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 5301 - Library

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
720102 Furniture & Fixtures $ - - - -
720109 Computers 2,216 - 1,545 -
730101 Passenger Vehicle - 37,387 - -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 2,216 37,387 1,545 - Total 5301 - Library: $ 656,557 931,670 1,114,936 1,183,352

4.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6201 - Economic Development

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510101 Salaries - Non-Sworn $ 157,625 $ 302,191 $ 314,923 $ 392,615 510103 Salaries - Temporary 1,395 - - -
510105 Overtime 354 1,013 250 -
520101 Retirement 43,559 82,769 31,068 38,389
520101-U CalPERS UAL - - 44,950 51,556
520103 Social Security (FICA) - - - -
520104 Group Health Insurance 30,189 41,837 52,048 73,976 520105 Worker's Compensation 17,917 32,226 33,981 35,076 520106 Disability Insurance 720 1,299 1,486 2,451
520107 Unemployment Insurance 4,986 14,671 15,478 19,487 520109 Life Insurance 403 519 470 720
520110 Medicare 2,261 4,057 4,213 5,693
Total Personnel Services: $ 259,409 480,582 498,867 619,963 Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 15,604 17,115 20,200 22,000
610103 Telephone 903 11,996 12,850 15,000
610106 Advertising - 324 1,500 2,000
610107 Books & Periodicals - - - 100
610109 Meeting & Travel 2,891 6,797 2,750 13,000
610113 Professional Fees / Other 10,713 28,454 55,000 45,000 610116 Professional Fees / Legal - - - 500
610121 Dues & Subscriptions 2,235 3,093 15,000 3,300
610123 Training - - 1,000 -
610129 Other Expense 3,538 4,952 3,500 8,500
620101 Office Supplies 4,166 3,017 3,000 4,000
620102 Postage 220 10 120 850
620103 Printing 4,491 1,850 2,200 2,500
630101 Building Maintenance 3,165 6,206 5,000 6,500
630112 Gasoline & Oil 412 735 300 700
630116 Motor Vehicle Expense 2,679 2,678 2,823 2,938
640124 Contributions 2,000 4,000 4,000 5,000
Total Material & Services: $ 53,017 91,227 129,243 131,888

4.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6201 - Economic Development

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
720101 Office Machines $ 9,627 283 - -
720102 Furniture & Fixtures - - 2,541 -
720109 Computers - 2,923 5,228 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 9,627 3,206 7,769 -
Total 6201 - Economic Development: $ 322,053 575,015 635,879 751,851

4.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6202 - Blight Elimination

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
510103 Salaries - Temporary $ 32,234 $ 44,583 $ 56,015 $ 40,500 510105 Overtime 191 1,099 250 -
520101 Retirement 1,083 2,146 3,759 5,085
520103 Social Security (FICA) 1,303 1,320 1,162 1,256
520104 Group Health Insurance 368 459 232 719
520105 Worker's Compensation 3,546 4,904 6,160 4,455
520106 Disability Insurance - - - -
520107 Unemployment Insurance 990 2,229 2,801 2,025
520109 Life Insurance - - - -
520110 Medicare 477 662 816 587
Total Personnel Services: $ 40,192 57,402 71,195 54,627 Materials & Services
610113 Professional Services / Other $ - - - 5,000
610129 Other Expenses 260 144 50 500
620102 Postage - - - 100
620103 Printing - 21 - 300
620131 Printing Supplies 8,673 8,883 10,000 10,000
Total Material & Services: $ 8,933 9,048 10,050 15,900

4.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6202 - Blight Elimination

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
720109 Computers $ - 1,248 5,063 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - 1,248 5,063 -
Total 6202 - Blight Elimination: $ 49,125 67,698 86,308 70,527

4.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6202 - Valley Center Point

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Personnel Services
Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
610101 Electricity $ 8,769 11,682 12,350 12,500
610113 Professional Fees / Other - - - 1,500
620130 Maintenance Supplies - - - 500
Total Material & Services: $ 8,769 11,682 12,350 14,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 6202 - Valley Center Point

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Projects / Outlay
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ - - - -
Total 6203 - Valley Center Point: $ 8,769 11,682 12,350 14,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
General Fund Expenditure Detail - FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Department 9101 - Transfers Out

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Transfers Out
820101 Transfers Out - PARS Trust $ 2,531,000 - - -
820101 Transfers Out - Special Events Fund 22,021 65,226 70,000 95,000 Total Transfers Out: $ 2,553,021 65,226 70,000 95,000
Total 9101 - Transfers Out: 2,553,021 $ 65,226 70,000 95,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) WATER
FUNDS

4.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Revenues:
470101 - Water Sales Revenues $ 8,569,630 8,055,018 7,939,590 8,000,000 450200 - Grant Revenue - State 868,000 - - -
470102 - Water Service Installations 58,442 38,360 38,997 40,000 470103 - Other Revenues 248,925 133,532 184,207 150,000 470121 - Interest Revenue 41,789 196,264 300,000 300,000 470121 - Interest Revenue - Fund 511 - Capacity - 77,931 125,000 125,000 470121 - Interest Revenue - Fund 513 - Stabilization 8,652 42,096 50,000 50,000 470173 - Water - Bad Debt Write-Offs / Late Fees 27,069 15,510 124,094 50,000 480103 - Water Capacity Fees - Fund 511 - Capacity 541,123 872,168 721,462 650,000 Total: $ 10,363,630 9,430,879 9,483,350 9,365,000
Expenditures:
9510 - Water System Maintenance
Personnel Services $ 513,998 532,640 482,657 565,082
Services and Supplies 242,531 289,000 203,230 296,968
Capital Projects / Outlay 129,701 11,095 91,077 585,500 9511 - Water Treatment Plant
Personnel Services $ 1,364,128 1,480,733 1,469,449 1,538,388 Services and Supplies 1,812,581 2,242,211 2,136,395 2,234,518 Capital Projects / Outlay 1,547,780 1,634,722 241,633 730,000 Debt Service 2,292,760 2,314,381 2,317,381 2,321,756
9512 - Water Customer Service
Personnel Services $ 250,652 248,920 275,812 293,690
Services and Supplies 218,923 235,165 179,172 339,843
Capital Projects / Outlay - 1,975 - -
9513 - Public Information Office
Services and Supplies $ 19,328 16,631 11,167 44,258
9516 - Administration - Water
Personnel Services $ 333,926 381,285 443,166 498,428
Services and Supplies 129,973 169,341 134,477 92,600
Capital Projects / Outlay 45,459 44,478 187,917 205,000 City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

4.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)
9519 - Overhead - Water
Services and Supplies $ 1,058,755 1,170,284 1,254,608 1,463,026 Total: $ 9,960,495 10,772,861 9,428,141 11,209,057
Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures $ 403,135 (1,341,982) 55,209 (1,844,057) Beginning Fund Balance $ 29,542,707 29,945,842 28,603,860 28,659,069 Less:

Fund Balance - Water Capacity Fees (Fund 511) $ - 987,147 1,833,609 2,608,609 Fund Balance - Rate Stabilization (Fund 513) 3,497,667 3,539,763 2,789,763 1,289,763 Fund Balance - Restricted for Debt Service 2,093,223 2,093,223 2,093,223 2,093,223 Ending Fund Balance / Working Capital $ 24,354,952 21,983,727 21,942,474 20,823,417

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Expenditures
Water System Maintenance $ 129,701 11,095 91,077 585,500 Water Treatment Plant 1,547,780 1,634,722 241,633 730,000 Water Customer Service - 1,975 - -
Administration 45,459 44,478 187,917 205,000
Total: $ 1,722,940 1,692,270 520,627 1,520,500
Capital Expenditure Detail

4.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9510 - Water System Maintenance
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 326,175 332,029 311,638 360,158 510102 - Overtime 6,597 11,605 8,742 12,000
520101 - Retirement 28,135 27,067 25,701 28,241
520101 - Retirement - UAL 49,970 60,112 46,532 48,065
520104 - Health Insurance 52,448 47,581 42,949 60,280
520105 - Workers Compensation 33,827 32,253 28,134 33,428 520106 - Disability Insurance 1,665 1,526 1,334 1,914
520107 - Unemployment 9,520 14,661 12,788 15,194
520109 - Life Insurance 541 421 352 580
520110 - Medicare 5,120 5,385 4,487 5,222
9511 - Water Treatment Plant
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 859,847 913,918 911,977 939,992 510102 - Overtime 16,357 32,223 26,571 25,000
520101 - Retirement 75,801 79,417 90,368 84,987
520101 - Retirement - UAL 126,264 142,466 113,006 144,647 520104 - Health Insurance 151,343 155,869 166,841 176,596 520105 - Workers Compensation 90,839 95,490 98,036 100,596 520106 - Disability Insurance 4,160 4,259 4,256 5,759
520107 - Unemployment 25,845 43,404 44,562 45,726
520109 - Life Insurance 1,435 1,252 1,135 1,455
520110 - Medicare 12,237 12,435 12,697 13,630
9512 - Water Customer Service
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 144,104 132,731 151,860 153,400 510103 - Temp. Salaries 17,815 22,701 19,242 20,966
510102 - Overtime 425 582 382 1,400
520101 - Retirement 12,998 12,959 15,532 14,256
520101 - Retirement - UAL 21,760 24,276 19,056 24,263
520103 - Social Security 1,043 1,263 902 1,300
520104 - Health Insurance 27,856 26,370 38,481 46,357
520105 - Workers Compensation 16,205 16,457 18,633 19,180 520106 - Disability Insurance 775 768 826 944
520107 - Unemployment 4,847 8,181 8,244 8,718
520109 - Life Insurance 376 311 305 378
520110 - Medicare 2,448 2,321 2,349 2,528

4.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9516 - Administration - Water
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 212,894 230,648 287,828 313,933 510103 - Temp. Salaries 6,092 745 - -
510102 - Overtime 214 1,184 774 1,000
520101 - Retirement 18,032 22,604 28,474 28,964
520101 - Retirement - UAL 30,534 41,182 37,860 49,298
520103 - Social Security 378 46 - -
520104 - Health Insurance 32,783 41,242 37,204 48,220
520105 - Workers Compensation 22,279 26,610 31,145 34,285 520106 - Disability Insurance 910 1,061 1,274 1,929
520107 - Unemployment 6,451 12,095 14,156 15,584
520109 - Life Insurance 362 371 397 663
520110 - Medicare 2,997 3,497 4,054 4,552
Total Personnel Services: $ 2,462,704 2,643,578 2,671,084 2,895,588 Materials & Services
9510 - Water System Maintenance
610101 - Electricity $ 5,092 5,689 5,158 7,000
610103 - Telephone 1,940 3,779 2,878 4,300
610109 - Meeting & Travel 4,271 1,545 1,688 4,500
610111 - Equipment Rental 200 1,426 - 500
610113 - Professional Fees 4,518 16,157 6,663 5,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions - - 103 500
610123 - Training 555 1,391 51 4,000
610125 - Uniform Rental 2,116 559 1,520 2,000
610129 - Other Expense 4,277 5,699 2,603 4,000
620101 - Office Supplies 1,795 1,074 961 900
620103 - Printing 208 146 157 300
620105 - Computer Supplies 599 119 - 350
620108 - Flares / Batteries 160 150 11 -
620109 - First Aid Supplies 130 702 - 200
620112 - Protective Clothing 1,348 597 1,708 3,000
620114 - Other Safety Supplies 1,988 1,856 3,327 4,000
620128 - Janitorial Supplies 974 712 663 -
620132 - Construction Materials 20,818 22,045 45,892 25,000 620136 - Treatment Chemicals 500 - - -
620139 - Pipe Fittings 83,416 126,585 28,182 115,000
620140 - Small Tools 7,209 4,070 8,079 8,500
630101 - Building Maintenace 1,014 1,050 521 1,050
630106 - Office Machines Mtc 33 - 20 -

4.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 630107 - Comm. Eqpt. Mtc 3,706 2,415 1,510 2,100
630108 - Field / Shop Eqpt Mtc 2,455 120 1,127 2,000
630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc 200 - - 300
630112 - Gasoline / Oil 17,995 17,092 12,346 20,000
630115 - Outside Maintenance 1,200 208 282 1,500
630116 - Motor Vehicle Expense 73,814 73,814 77,780 80,968 9511 - Water Treatment Plant
610101 - Electricity $ 474,821 477,130 470,192 625,000
610103 - Telephone 9,838 10,716 10,713 12,000
610105 - Leaselines 1,819 1,966 808 2,000
610106 - Advertising - - 71 2,000
610107 - Books & Periodicals - - 46 -
610109 - Meeting & Travel 4,531 4,038 2,369 5,000
610111 - Equipment Rental 2,969 6,194 1,157 3,500
610113 - Professional Fees 197,941 146,230 124,362 250,000 610117 - Solid Waste Collections - 30 - -
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions 2,669 2,968 2,523 3,000
610123 - Training 1,246 742 - 1,500
610125 - Uniform Rental 3,604 3,602 3,798 4,500
610129 - Other Expense 4,759 3,940 7,280 10,000
610131 - Filing Fees - 48,434 50,988 51,000
620101 - Office Supplies 4,692 6,381 3,262 6,000
620102 - Postage - 605 517 -
620103 - Printing 145 2,902 500 1,500
620112 - Protective Clothing 4,833 4,213 3,552 4,000
620114 - Other Safety Supplies 4,268 986 5,469 3,000
620122 - Grounds Landscaping 401 3,138 291 2,000
620125 - Chemicals / Fertilizers 737 58 - 750
620128 - Janitorial Supplies 9,672 10,149 6,621 10,000
620130 - Maintenance Supplies 3,833 1,779 1,556 4,000
620131 - Printing Supplies 1,569 730 169 1,000
620132 - Construction Materials - 2,993 2,711 4,000
620135 - Other Supplies 316 272 494 1,500
620136 - Treatment Chemicals 471,527 806,576 690,763 600,000 620137 - Lab Tests & Supplies 42,089 41,970 60,630 55,000 620138 - Purchased Water 211,658 160,437 145,894 200,000 620139 - Pipe Fittings 8,541 34,536 7,689 9,000
620140 - Small Tools 2,686 9,100 2,319 4,000
630101 - Building Maintenace 297 612 - 1,000
630106 - Office Machines Mtc 1,225 1,021 469 1,000
630107 - Comm. Eqpt. Mtc 11,873 14,567 11,789 14,000
630108 - Field / Shop Eqpt Mtc 1,188 133 518 2,500
630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc - 80 37 1,000
630111 - Other Facility Mtc 54,953 116,637 187,689 80,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 630112 - Gasoline / Oil 34,165 30,621 29,946 37,000
630115 - Outside Maintenance - 670 - 500
630116 - Motor Vehicle Expense 29,417 29,637 30,998 32,268 630117 - Meter Maintenance 91,605 144,990 196,228 100,000 630120 - Water Pumps Mtc 111,080 106,578 69,227 80,000
640112 - Bank Charges 5,614 3,850 2,750 10,000
9512 - Water Customer Service
610103 - Telephone $ 3,617 3,462 2,602 5,500
610109 - Meeting & Travel - - - 3,500
610113 - Professional Fees 26,766 29,738 27,717 79,275
610129 - Other Expense 717 56 211 1,000
610138 - Online Fees 101,420 107,644 53,964 114,000
620101 - Office Supplies 2,242 1,826 2,045 3,500
620102 - Postage 47,022 55,194 55,091 60,848
620103 - Printing 12,301 12,587 10,633 20,300
620105 - Computer Supplies 1,930 2,442 3,713 2,170
630106 - Office Machines 540 622 669 1,050
640122 - Bank Charges 6,641 6,399 3,064 8,700
640116 - Bad Debt Expense 15,727 15,195 19,463 40,000
9513 - Public Information Office
610113 - Professional Fees $ 15,485 13,631 11,167 1,768 610115 - Prof. Fees - Lobby 3,000 3,000 - 40,000
620103 - Printing 843 - - 2,490
9516 - Administration - Water
610103 - Telephone $ 1,484 1,603 942 1,500
610106 - Advertisement - - - 700
610107 - Books & Periodicals - 10 - -
610108 - Auto Reimbursement 40 26 11 100
610109 - Meeting & Travel 681 595 596 2,000
610113 - Professional Fees 49,796 63,481 35,171 62,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions 145 299 53 1,500
610123 - Training 900 1,158 3,165 1,500
610129 - Other Expense 74,469 87,556 92,095 17,000
620101 - Office Supplies 1,202 687 1,472 1,000
620102 - Postage 29 - - -
620103 - Printing 233 260 142 500
620105 - Computer Supplies 671 609 251 1,000
620109 - First Aid Supplies - - - 50
620114 - Other Safety Supplies - 100 100 250
620128 - Janitorial Supplies - - - 1,000
630101 - Building Maintenance - - - 1,000
630106 - Office Machines Mtc 17 134 393 250

4.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 630107 - Comm Eqpt Mtc 172 180 86 250
630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc 134 12,643 - 500
630112 - Gasoline & Oil - - - 500
9519 - Overhead - Water
810102 - Overhead $ 1,058,755 1,170,284 1,254,608 1,463,026 Total Material & Services: $ 3,482,091 4,122,632 3,919,049 4,471,213 Capital Projects / Outlay
9510 - Water System Maintenance
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - 50,182 400,000
720106 - Field Equipment - 7,043 - -
720108 - Safety Equipment 10,000 4,052 8,056 -
720109 - Computers 3,629 - - -
730104 - Heavy Equipment 116,072 - 32,839 185,500
9511 - Water Treatment Plant
710102 - Architecture / Eng $ 1,123 - - 25,000
710106 - Other Real Property 917,410 1,334,891 241,633 568,000 710107 - Other Property - Grants 626,828 - - -
720101 - Office Machines - 9,418 - -
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - - - 37,000
720106 - Field Equipment - 21,136 - 100,000
720109 - Computers 2,419 10,475 - -
730102 - Trucks - 141,303 - -
730104 - Heavy Equipment - 117,499 - -
9512 - Water Customer Service
720101 - Office Machines $ - 1,975 - -
9516 - Administration - Water
710104 - Land $ - - 75,888 -
710106 - Other Real Property - - 54,095 150,000
720101 - Office Machines 822 300 - -
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - 835 1,033 -
720104 - Fixed Shop Equipment 4,950 - - -
720109 - Computers 3,257 2,372 4,798 -
720110 - Computer Software 36,430 40,971 52,103 55,000
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 1,722,940 1,692,270 520,627 1,520,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Water Enterprise Funds (Fund 501 / 511 / 513)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Debt Service
9511 - Water Treatment Plant
640114 - Principal - 2014A $ 1,125,000 1,305,000 1,375,000 1,450,000 640114 - Principal - CIEDB 100,247 - - -
640110 - Interest - 2014A $ 1,064,506 1,009,381 942,381 871,756 640110 - Interest - CIEDB 3,007 - - -
Total Debt Service: $ 2,292,760 2,314,381 2,317,381 2,321,756 Total Water Enterprise Fund: $ 9,960,495 10,772,861 9,428,141 11,209,057

4.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

WASTEWATER
FUNDS

4.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Revenues:
470105 - Wastewater Fees $ 9,828,973 9,749,836 9,769,142 9,800,000 470106 - Wastewater Connection Fees 16,190 11,076 11,934 11,500 470107 - Other Revenues 16,231 - - 2,000
470121 - Interest Revenue 44,358 222,321 340,000 300,000 470121 - Interest Revenue - Fund 512 - Capacity - 43,067 75,000 75,000 470121 - Interest Revenue - Fund 514 - Stabilization 8,639 42,031 60,000 60,000 480103 - Water Capacity Fees - Fund 512 - Capacity - 988,856 799,686 650,000 Total: $ 9,914,391 11,057,187 11,055,762 10,898,500
Expenditures:
9520 - Wastewater System Maintenance
Personnel Services $ 562,372 609,027 574,323 674,345
Services and Supplies 112,978 131,957 111,675 148,104
Capital Projects / Outlay 135,502 339,494 553,176 1,085,000 9521 - Wastewater Treatment Plan
Personnel Services $ 1,361,942 1,391,464 1,418,537 1,602,893 Services and Supplies 1,547,163 1,776,085 1,873,229 1,942,880 Capital Projects / Outlay 113,143 1,621,340 2,620,200 8,660,000 Debt Service 2,333,911 2,332,952 2,248,619 2,248,813
9522 - Wastewater Customer Service
Personnel Services $ 117,436 141,472 126,126 136,917
Services and Supplies 176,094 187,438 133,479 253,683
Capital Projects / Outlay - 846 - -
9523 - Public Information Office
Services and Supplies $ 19,328 16,631 11,167 44,258
9525 - Environmental Compliance
Personnel Services $ 150,277 191,160 177,746 179,557
Services and Supplies 33,737 31,364 12,893 44,050
Capital Projects / Outlay - 3,900 - -
9528 - Administration - Wastewater
Personnel Services $ 298,367 324,052 380,853 506,380
Services and Supplies 129,684 170,999 131,875 92,150
Capital Projects / Outlay 45,456 44,478 187,836 205,000 City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

4.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)
9519 - Overhead - Wastewater
Services and Supplies $ 985,785 725,555 1,199,762 1,399,068 Total: $ 8,123,175 10,040,214 11,761,496 19,223,098
Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures $ 1,791,216 1,016,973 (705,734) (8,324,598) Beginning Fund Balance $ 26,159,328 27,950,544 28,967,517 28,261,783 Less:

Fund Balance - WW Capacity Fees (Fund 512) $ 57,165 1,089,089 1,926,686 2,651,686 Fund Balance - Rate Stabilization (Fund 514) 3,503,900 3,545,931 3,576,896 3,636,896 Fund Balance - Restricted for Debt Service - - - -
Ending Fund Balance / Working Capital $ 24,389,479 24,332,497 22,758,201 13,648,603

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Expenditures
Wastewater System Maintenance $ 135,502 339,494 553,176 1,085,000 Wastewater Treatment Plant 113,143 1,621,340 2,620,200 8,660,000 Wastewater Customer Service - 846 - -
Environmental Compliance - 3,900 - -
Administration 45,456 44,478 187,836 205,000
Total: $ 294,101 2,010,058 3,361,212 9,950,000
Capital Expenditure Detail

4.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9520 - Wastewater System Maintenance
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 358,873 369,067 360,159 416,928 510102 - Overtime 13,802 38,563 30,859 16,000
520101 - Retirement 30,421 30,428 31,542 37,966
520101 - Retirement - UAL 52,014 60,220 47,046 58,593
520104 - Health Insurance 52,546 49,709 47,296 74,137
520105 - Workers Compensation 36,491 36,247 34,498 42,300 520106 - Disability Insurance 1,802 1,725 1,621 2,412
520107 - Unemployment 10,317 16,476 15,681 19,227
520109 - Life Insurance 600 489 427 737
520110 - Medicare 5,506 6,103 5,194 6,045
9521 - Wastewater Treatment Plant
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 831,303 810,301 829,924 961,457 510103 - Temp. Salaries 10,627 35,425 47,856 -
510102 - Overtime 34,047 40,626 34,204 45,000
520101 - Retirement 73,667 72,709 83,068 90,417
520101 - Retirement - UAL 136,508 150,218 113,970 139,541 520103 - Social Security 661 1,198 801 -
520104 - Health Insurance 142,435 134,293 158,919 198,774 520105 - Workers Compensation 88,904 88,928 91,246 100,738 520106 - Disability Insurance 4,014 3,814 3,812 5,667
520107 - Unemployment 25,506 40,422 41,476 45,790
520109 - Life Insurance 1,389 1,052 1,004 1,568
520110 - Medicare 12,881 12,478 12,257 13,941
9522 - Wastewater Customer Service
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 68,015 87,383 69,743 71,944
510103 - Temp. Salaries 7,635 10,358 8,417 8,986
510102 - Overtime 182 249 164 600
520101 - Retirement 6,129 6,075 7,140 7,103
520101 - Retirement - UAL 10,268 11,408 8,912 10,962
520103 - Social Security 447 561 386 557
520104 - Health Insurance 13,189 12,302 17,468 22,022
520105 - Workers Compensation 7,614 7,733 8,455 8,902
520106 - Disability Insurance 367 359 382 444
520107 - Unemployment 2,267 3,815 3,843 4,046
520109 - Life Insurance 177 144 140 178
520110 - Medicare 1,146 1,085 1,076 1,173

4.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9525 - Environmental Compliance
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 83,833 120,341 106,698 105,628 510103 - Temp. Salaries - - - -
510102 - Overtime 855 1,700 2,282 2,000
520101 - Retirement 9,778 9,451 10,741 10,429
520101 - Retirement - UAL 15,976 17,680 13,464 16,094
520103 - Social Security - - - -
520104 - Health Insurance 22,413 23,504 25,757 26,054
520105 - Workers Compensation 11,770 11,503 11,737 11,619 520106 - Disability Insurance 590 565 573 718
520107 - Unemployment 3,364 5,228 5,335 5,281
520109 - Life Insurance 200 178 163 202
520110 - Medicare 1,498 1,010 996 1,532
9528 - Administration - Wastewater
510101 - Perm. Salaries $ 184,322 194,654 245,476 271,566 510103 - Temp. Salaries 6,640 496 - -
510102 - Overtime 640 714 52 1,000
520101 - Retirement 15,154 18,694 24,272 26,620
520101 - Retirement - UAL 25,848 35,058 32,868 41,082
520103 - Social Security 420 31 - -
520104 - Health Insurance 37,315 38,445 34,601 116,733
520105 - Workers Compensation 18,949 21,899 26,555 29,658 520106 - Disability Insurance 806 908 1,125 1,670
520107 - Unemployment 5,412 9,954 12,071 13,481
520109 - Life Insurance 356 334 374 632
520110 - Medicare 2,505 2,865 3,459 3,938
Total Personnel Services: $ 2,490,394 2,657,175 2,677,585 3,100,092 Materials & Services
9520 - Wastewater System Maintenance
610101 - Electricity $ 5,092 5,688 5,158 7,000
610103 - Telephone 5,844 7,639 4,415 7,500
610109 - Meeting & Travel 2,829 877 1,692 3,000
610111 - Equipment Rental 500 500 - 500
610113 - Professional Fees 3,367 15,885 5,849 5,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions - 159 104 350
610123 - Training 355 849 2,564 4,000
610125 - Uniform Rental 942 892 1,348 2,000
610129 - Other Expense 1,528 1,803 1,974 3,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 620101 - Office Supplies 600 600 788 900
620103 - Printing 185 146 157 300
620105 - Computer Supplies 350 - 150 350
620108 - Flares / Batteries - - - -
620109 - First Aid Supplies 100 17 - 200
620112 - Protective Clothing 288 757 1,682 3,000
620114 - Other Safety Supplies 836 1,369 1,730 4,000
620128 - Janitorial Supplies 1,187 575 659 -
620132 - Construction Materials 10,184 13,043 15,157 15,000 620136 - Treatment Chemicals 2,000 1,000 26 2,000
620139 - Pipe Fittings 12,922 12,005 5,204 13,000
620140 - Small Tools 1,885 2,790 2,404 6,500
630101 - Building Maintenace 989 640 521 1,050
630106 - Office Machines Mtc - - - -
630107 - Comm. Eqpt. Mtc 1,586 2,415 1,440 2,100
630108 - Field / Shop Eqpt Mtc 355 655 1,127 4,000
630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc 60 11 - 300
630112 - Gasoline / Oil 15,054 19,202 12,523 15,000
630115 - Outside Maintenance 1,500 - 282 1,500
630116 - Motor Vehicle Expense 42,440 42,440 44,721 46,554 9521 - Wastewater Treatment Plant
610101 - Electricity $ 444,585 447,311 498,490 560,000
610102 - Natrual Gas 1,806 34,747 28,528 30,000
610103 - Telephone 8,148 7,481 6,013 10,000
610104 - Water 832 1,563 2,028 1,000
610105 - Leaselines - - - -
610106 - Advertising 186 - 71 -
610107 - Books & Periodicals 618 159 170 1,000
610108 - Auto Reimbursement 93 - - 300
610109 - Meeting & Travel 9,536 7,621 7,149 15,000
610111 - Equipment Rental 33,298 28,435 2,954 10,000
610113 - Professional Fees 125,974 196,618 263,705 300,000 610117 - Solid Waste Collections - - - -
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions 907 1,982 2,340 4,000
610123 - Training 2,264 3,442 70 4,000
610125 - Uniform Rental 4,011 3,249 3,620 5,000
610129 - Other Expense 2,960 6,786 5,994 6,000
610131 - Filing Fees 58,820 81,338 107,010 87,000
620101 - Office Supplies 3,853 4,503 2,318 5,000
620102 - Postage 15 27 - -
620103 - Printing - - - -
620105 - Computer Supplies 1,353 - 1,141 1,500
620108 - Flares / Batteries / Film 893 248 18 -
620109 - First Aid Supplies - - - 300

4.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 620112 - Protective Clothing 4,385 5,421 4,778 6,000
620114 - Other Safety Supplies - - - -
620122 - Grounds Landscaping - - - -
620125 - Chemicals / Fertilizers - - - -
620128 - Janitorial Supplies 10,948 14,471 16,104 11,500 620130 - Maintenance Supplies 8,405 2,989 1,508 5,000
620131 - Printing Supplies 11 100 471 1,500
620132 - Construction Materials 4,566 2,190 89 2,500
620135 - Other Supplies - - - -
620136 - Treatment Chemicals 310,952 340,499 240,260 310,000 620137 - Lab Tests & Supplies 78,403 66,071 105,033 95,000 620138 - Purchased Water - - - -
620139 - Pipe Fittings - - - -
620140 - Small Tools 1,931 1,304 1,507 1,500
630101 - Building Maintenace 2,988 2,543 5,444 2,000
630103 - Grounds / Landscaping 29,996 27,870 15,039 30,000 630106 - Office Machines Mtc 1,007 681 659 1,000
630107 - Comm. Eqpt. Mtc 12,082 11,962 14,494 16,000
630108 - Field / Shop Eqpt Mtc 302,465 389,613 457,954 325,000 630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc - 464 280 500
630111 - Other Facility Mtc - - - -
630112 - Gasoline / Oil 23,211 23,581 21,870 30,000
630113 - Tires & Batteries 158 125 1,135 2,000
630114 - Parts - 22 - -
630115 - Outside Maintenance - - - -
630116 - Motor Vehicle Expense 48,573 48,574 51,235 53,280 630117 - Meter Maintenance - - - -
630120 - Water Pumps Mtc - - - -
640112 - Bank Charges 6,930 12,095 3,750 10,000
9522 - Wastewater Customer Service
610103 - Telephone $ - - - -
610109 - Meeting & Travel - - - 1,500
610113 - Professional Fees 16,271 19,180 17,996 41,275
610129 - Other Expense 300 - - 500
610138 - Online Fees 101,420 107,644 53,964 114,000
620101 - Office Supplies 951 783 876 1,500
620102 - Postage 20,152 23,655 23,580 26,078
620103 - Printing 5,272 5,394 4,557 8,700
620105 - Computer Supplies 861 1,047 1,591 930
630106 - Office Machines 540 622 669 500
640122 - Bank Charges 6,641 6,399 3,064 8,700
640116 - Bad Debt Expense 23,686 22,714 27,182 50,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9523 - Public Information Office
610113 - Professional Fees $ 15,485 13,631 11,167 1,768 610115 - Prof. Fees - Lobby 3,000 3,000 - 40,000
620103 - Printing 843 - - 2,490
9525 - Environmental Compliance
610103 - Telephone $ 946 949 766 1,000
610104 - Water 125 142 55 100
610106 - Advertising - 1,588 1,591 800
610107 - Books & Periodicals - - - 500
610108 - Auto Reimbursement - - - 100
610109 - Meeting & Travel 83 1,194 300 2,000
610113 - Professional Fees 7,351 2,624 4,043 10,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions 192 298 545 400
610123 - Training 375 655 704 1,400
610129 - Other Expense 106 1,576 1,857 1,500
610131 - Filming Fees 19,404 17,666 - 22,000
620101 - Office Supplies 1,242 1,234 726 1,000
620105 - Computer Supplies 1,074 583 - 500
620108 - Flares / Batteries 81 - - -
620112 - Protective Clothing 437 463 381 500
630109 - Computer Mtc 87 - - 250
630112 - Gasoline & Oil 2,234 2,392 1,925 2,000
9528 - Administration - Wastewater
610103 - Telephone $ 1,484 1,603 942 1,500
610106 - Advertisement - - - 700
610107 - Books & Periodicals - 10 2 -
610108 - Auto Reimbursement - 26 11 100
610109 - Meeting & Travel 682 1,405 585 2,000
610113 - Professional Fees 49,778 63,480 35,112 62,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions 145 299 53 1,500
610123 - Training 500 1,158 626 1,500
610129 - Other Expense 74,467 88,310 92,101 17,000
620101 - Office Supplies 1,202 781 1,490 1,000
620102 - Postage 29 - - -
620103 - Printing 233 260 124 500
620105 - Computer Supplies 671 609 250 1,000
620109 - First Aid Supplies - - - 100
620114 - Other Safety Supplies - 100 100 250
620128 - Janitorial Supplies - - - 1,000
630101 - Building Maintenance - - - 1,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 630106 - Office Machines Mtc 17 134 393 250
630107 - Comm Eqpt Mtc 342 181 86 250
630109 - Computer Eqpt Mtc 134 12,643 - 500
630112 - Gasoline & Oil - - - -
9529 - Overhead - Wasteater
810102 - Overhead $ 985,785 725,555 1,199,762 1,399,068 Total Material & Services: $ 3,004,769 3,040,029 3,474,080 3,924,193 Capital Projects / Outlay
9520 - Wastewater System Maintenance
710106 - Other Real Property $ 61,873 329,974 512,529 900,000 720106 - Field Equipment - 4,913 - -
720108 - Safety Equipment 10,000 4,607 7,808 -
720109 - Computers 3,629 - - -
730104 - Heavy Equipment 60,000 - 32,839 185,000
9521 - Wastewater Treatment Plant
710102 - Architecture / Eng $ 15,248 - - 350,000
710105 - Buildings - 5,307 1,053 10,000
710106 - Other Real Property 73,746 1,305,978 2,379,349 8,300,000 710107 - Other Property - Grants - - - -
720101 - Office Machines 12,707 - - -
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - - 73 -
720106 - Field Equipment 5,911 121,201 90,252 -
720108 - Safety Equipment 2,246 396 - -
720109 - Computers 3,285 5,867 - -
730102 - Trucks - 42,068 - -
730104 - Heavy Equipment - 140,523 149,473 -
9522 - Wastewater Customer Service
720101 - Office Machines $ - 846 - -
9525 - Environmental Compliance
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures $ - 977 - -
720109 - Computers - 2,923 - -

4.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Wastewater Enterprise Funds (Fund 502 / 512 / 514)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 9528 - Administration - Wastewater
710104 - Land $ - - 75,886 -
710106 - Other Real Property - - 54,095 150,000
720101 - Office Machines 822 300 - -
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - 835 1,033 -
720104 - Fixed Shop Equipment 4,946 - - -
720109 - Computers 3,258 2,372 4,719 -
720110 - Computer Software 36,430 40,971 52,103 55,000
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 294,101 2,010,058 3,361,212 9,950,000 Debt Service
9521 - Wastewater Treatment Plant
640114 - Principal - 2014A $ 635,000 665,000 900,000 940,000 640114 - Principal - 2012 RB 525,000 540,000 555,000 580,000 640114 - Principal - CIEDB 265,482 273,447 - -
640110 - Interest - 2014A $ 767,400 738,075 698,950 652,950 640114 - Interest - 2012 RB 128,843 112,328 94,669 75,863 640110 - Interest - CIEDB 12,186 4,102 - -
Total Debt Service: $ 2,333,911 2,332,952 2,248,619 2,248,813 Total Wastewater Enterprise Fund: $ 8,123,175 10,040,214 11,761,496 19,223,098

4.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

MEASURE P
FUND

4.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Revenues:
420101 - Sales Tax $ 7,519,268 7,989,105 7,506,000 7,618,590 470121 - Interest Earnings 40,159 221,013 350,000 350,000 470126 - Bond Proceeds - - - -
Total: $ 7,559,427 8,210,118 7,856,000 7,968,590
Expenditures:
1101 - City Council
Materials & Services $ - - 45,000 45,000
1102 - City Clerk
Materials & Services $ - 9,860 650 7,500
1201 - City Manager
Materials & Services $ - 9,000 - -
1304 - Information Technology
Materials & Services $ - 15,600 12,000 -
Capital Projects / Outlay 22,200 176,960 142,809 -
1801 - Facility Maintenance
Capital Projects / Outlay $ 11,215 70,889 1,518,411 622,825 1802 - Incubator Building
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - - - 76,620
1901 - Non-Departmental
Materials & Services $ 1,549 38,750 36,932 40,000
Capital Projects / Outlay - 52,000 - -
2101 - Police Services
Capital Projects / Outlay $ 2,170,971 1,254,384 179,619 4,260,000 2301 - Fire Services
Capital Projects / Outlay $ 1,398,989 126,981 244,946 148,198 3201 - Street Maintenance
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 9,916 23,505 70,000
3406 - 7th Street Transfer Station
Materials & Services $ - - 53,874 72,250
4101 - Building Regulation
Materials & Services $ 2,500 - - -
Capital Projects / Outlay 77,968 52,759 13,964 1,381,355 City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

4.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)
4301 - Engineering
Materials & Services $ - - - 200,000
Capital Projects / Outlay - 33,584 343,616 650,000
4401 - Planning
Materials & Services $ - 13,821 18,901 17,471
Capital Projects / Outlay - - 32,266 -
5101 - Parks
Materials & Services $ 89,280 85,544 285,740 320,000
Capital Projects / Outlay 305,461 190,246 477,611 682,000 5102 - Bucklin Park
Materials & Services $ 46,500 - - -
Capital Projects / Outlay 8,936 123,913 - 450,000
5103 - McGee Park
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 437,817 339,501 10,183
5105 - Swarthout Park
Capital Projects / Outlay $ 45,825 132,376 2,096,193 153,000 5106 - Dog Park Project
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - - 490,458 61,500
5107 - Debbie Pittman Park
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 47,698 1,074,179 30,000
5108 - Buena Vista Park
Materials & Services $ - - - 50,000
Capital Projects / Outlay - - 160,988 1,379,472
5202 - Community Center
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 39,355 18,124 735,000
5204 - Youth Center
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 25,850 14,206 21,925
5205 - Adult Center
Materials & Services $ 10,745 20,650 24,358 35,000
Capital Projects / Outlay - - - 500,000
5206 - Aquatic Center
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 36,271 - -
5211 - MLK Sports Center
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 36,969 13,206 63,543

4.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised))

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
City of El Centro
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Revised Budget
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)
5301 - Library - Main
Materials & Services $ - 46,103 - -
Capital Projects / Outlay - - - 7,994
6201 - Economic Development
Materials & Services $ 117,311 - - 104,955
Capital Projects / Outlay - 37,713 9,000 -
6202 - Blight Elimination
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - - - 17,500
6203 - Valley Center Point
Capital Projects / Outlay $ - 66,249 9,216 1,700,000
9115 - Transfers Out - Debt Service $ 534,729 886,435 2,699,096 3,293,781 9115 - Transfers Out - Public Safety Mat/Svcs - - - 2,128,020 Total: $ 4,844,179 4,077,693 10,378,369 19,335,092
Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures $ 2,715,248 4,132,425 (2,522,369) (11,366,502) Beginning Fund Balance $ 14,681,443 17,396,691 21,529,116 19,006,747 Ending Fund Balance $ 17,396,691 21,529,116 19,006,747 7,640,245

ESTIMATED ESTIMATED REVISED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Capital Expenditures
General Government $ 33,415 299,849 1,661,220 699,445
Public Safety 3,569,960 1,381,365 424,565 4,408,198
Public Works - 9,916 23,505 70,000
Community Development 77,968 86,343 389,846 2,031,355
Parks and Recreation 360,222 1,070,495 4,684,466 4,086,623 Library - - - 7,994
Economic Development - 37,713 9,000 17,500
Valley Center Point - 66,249 9,216 1,700,000
Total: $ 4,041,565 2,951,930 7,201,818 13,021,115
Capital Expenditure Detail

4.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 Total Personnel Services: $ - - - -
Materials & Services
1101 - City Council
610129 - Other Expense $ - - 45,000 45,000
1102 - City Clerk
610113 - Professional Fees $ - 9,860 650 7,500
1201 - City Manager
610113 - Professional Fees $ - 9,000 - -
1304 - Information Technology
610113 - Professional Fees $ - 15,600 12,000 -
1901 - Non-Departmental
610113 - Professional Fees $ 1,549 3,495 2,947 5,000
610121 - Dues & Subscriptions - 35,255 33,985 35,000
3406 - 7th Street Trf Terminal
610113 - Professional Fees $ - - 53,874 72,250
4101 - Building Regulation
610113 - Professional Fees $ 2,500 - - -
4301 - Engineering
610113 - Professional Fees $ - - - 200,000
4401 - Planning
610113 - Professional Fees $ - 13,821 18,901 17,471
5101 - Parks
610113 - Professional Fees $ - - 190,643 200,000
610135 - Special Events 89,280 85,544 95,097 120,000
5102 - Bucklin Park
610113 - Professional Fees $ 46,500 - - -
5108 - Buena Vista Park
610113 - Professional Fees $ - - - 50,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 5205 - Adult Center
610113 - Professional Fees $ 10,745 20,650 24,358 35,000 5301 - Library - Main
610113 - Professional Fees - 46,103 - -
6201 - Economic Development
640127 - Storefront Program $ 117,311 - - 104,955
Total Material & Services: $ 267,885 239,328 477,455 892,176 Capital Projects / Outlay
1304 - Information Technology
710106 - Other Real Property $ 4,800 7,260 54,471 -
720109 - Computers - 109,178 88,338 -
720110 - Computer Software 17,400 60,522 - -
1801 - Facility Maintenance
710106 - Other Real Property $ 11,215 70,889 1,465,163 622,825 720102 - Furtniture & Fixtures - - 313 -
730102 - Trucks - - 52,935 -
1802 - Incubator Building
710105 - Buildings $ - - - 76,620
1901 - Non-Departmental
730101 - Passenger Vehicles $ - 52,000 - -
2101 - Police Services
710102 - Architecture / Eng. $ 1,555,971 277,860 - -
710105 - Buildings - - 4,000,000 -
720108 - Safety Equipment 615,000 286,709 18,935 -
720109 - Computers - - 2,500 260,000
730101 - Passenger Vehicles - 204,011 158,184 -
730103 - Public Safety Vehicles - 485,804 - -

4.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 2301 - Fire Services
710102 - Architecture / Eng. $ - 36,730 - -
710105 - Buildings - - - -
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - - 23,609 14,024
720106 - Field Equipment - 77,139 160,251 17,142
720108 - Safety Equipment - - 4,556 -
720109 - Computers - - 4,964 -
720111 - Communication Eqpt - 13,112 51,566 19,032
730103 - Public Safety Vehicles 1,398,989 - - 98,000
3201 - Street Maintenance
720106 - Field Equipment $ - 4,965 - -
720108 - Safety Equipment - 4,951 7,086 -
730104 - Heavy Equipment - - 16,419 70,000
4101 - Building Regulation
710106 - Other Real Property $ 77,968 52,759 8,348 1,316,355 720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - - 5,616 -
730102 - Trucks - - - 65,000
4301 - Engineering
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - 343,616 650,000
730102 - Trucks - 33,584 - -
4401 - Planning
730101 - Passenger Vehicles $ - - 32,266 -
5101 - Parks
710105 - Buildings $ - 50,218 386,782 385,000
710106 - Other Real Property 114,257 9,778 90,829 -
720106 - Field Equipment 92,074 - - 90,000
730102 - Trucks - 130,250 - 75,000
730104 - Heavy Equipment 99,130 - - 132,000
5102 - Bucklin Park
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 23,000 - 450,000
720107 - Parks & Rec Eqpt $ 8,936 100,913 - -
5103 - McGee Park
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 437,817 339,501 10,183 5105 - Swarthout Park
710106 - Other Real Property $ 45,825 132,376 2,096,193 153,000

4.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 5106 - Dog Park Project
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - 490,458 61,500
5107 - Debbie Pittman Park
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 47,698 1,074,179 30,000 5108 - Buena Vista Park
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - 160,988 1,379,472
5202 - Community Center
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - - 735,000
720102 - Furniture & Fixtures - - 11,800 -
720109 - Computers - - 6,324 -
730102 - Trucks - 39,355 - -
5204 - Youth Center
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 25,850 14,206 -
720107 - Parks & Rec Eqpt - - - 21,925
5205 - Adult Center
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - - 500,000
5206 - Aquatic Center
730102 - Trucks $ - 36,271 - -
5211 - MLK Sports Center
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 36,969 13,206 -
720107 - Parks & Rec Eqpt - - - 63,543
5301 - Library
710106 - Other Real Property $ - - - 7,994
6201 - Economic Develompment
720101 - Office Machines $ - - 9,000 -
730102 - Trucks - 37,713 - -
6202 - Blight Elimination
720106 - Field Equipment $ - - - 17,500

4.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City of El Centro
FY 2024-25 Revised Budget - Expenditure Detail
Measure P Fund (Fund 299)

ESTIMATED PROPOSED

ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET
Personnel Services FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 6203 - Valley Center Point
710106 - Other Real Property $ - 66,249 1,700,000 -
720106 - Field Equipment - - 9,216 -
Total Capital Projects / Outlay: $ 4,041,565 2,951,930 7,201,818 13,021,115 Transfers Out
9115 - Transfers Out - Debt Service
820101 - T/O to 300 - Library $ 534,729 886,435 900,169 898,269 820101 - T/O to 300 - Police Stn - 1,798,927 - 2,395,512 9115 - Transfers Out - Pub Sfty Exp
820101 - T/O to 100 - Pub Sfty $ - - 2,128,020 -
Total Transfers Out: $ 534,729 886,435 2,699,096 5,421,801 Total Measure P Fund: $ 4,844,179 4,077,693 10,378,369 19,335,092

4.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: FY 2024-25 Revised Budget Schedules - 073124 (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) 06/2024/cdz/Reso/AdoptionofBudgetFY24-25 1
RESOLUTION NO. 24-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA CORRECTING,

AMENDING AND READOPTING CERTAIN FUNDS

OF THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2024-2025
WHEREAS, on or about June 27, 2024, the Finance Director of the City prepared an initial budget for fiscal year 2024-2025 and presented it to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the budget was presented with the expectation that it would be corrected, updated and amended at a future date; and
WHEREAS, at that meeting, the City Council raised a number of questions concerning the assumptions used for that budget; and
WHEREAS, since that time, the City Manager has engaged the services of a financial consultant and has appointed an Interim Finance Director, who now have prepared and submitted to the City Council of the City of El Centro the corrected selected funds and amended budgets for fiscal year 2024-2025 and have presented the budgets, specifically including the corrected numbers; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Ad Hoc Committee has reviewed the corrected and amended budgets for fiscal year 2024-2025 at length; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 24-56 is repealed in its entirety upon adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of El Centro, California does hereby adopt the corrected and amended budgets for fiscal year 2024-2025 for the City of El Centro as prepared and submitted by the City Manager and as may be modified by the City Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California held on the 31
st day of July, 2024.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
By
Sylvia Marroquin, Mayor
ATTEST:

By
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

4.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Resolution 24- Annual Budget (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) 06/2024/cdz/Reso/AdoptionofBudgetFY24-25 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
By
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL ) ss

CITY OF EL CENTRO )
I, Norma Wyles, City Clerk of the City of El Centro, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24- was duly and regularly adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the 31st day of July, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

By
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

4.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Resolution 24- Annual Budget (6479 : Annual Fiscal Year 2025 Budget (Revised)) City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: Public Works
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Budget
Prepared By: Abraham Campos
SCHEDULED Department Head: Abraham Campos
ACTION ITEM (ID # 6465) DOC ID: 6465
Update and Any Necessary Action Regarding ARPA Funding
Related to Public Works Department Activities
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve the revised list of ARPA projects as presented.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No impact to the General Fund. Existing ARPA funding for public works projects is proposed to be redistributed to reflect projected expenditures and create budget for the Water and Sewer Master Plan Update and Rate Study project.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

Goal #1 - Financial & Governance Stability & Sustainability Action 1.8 - Pursue funding to improve and expand public infrastructure while reducing costs to the community.

Goal #2 - Environmental Sustainability & Infrastructure DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTORS LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKS, INSURANCE, ETC:

NA
BACKGROUND:

ARPA funding has been allocated by the City Council to significant water and sewer projects, representing a strategic investment in infrastructure that results in enduring benefits for the community. This initiative addresses critical water and sewer infrastructure needs in El Centro, fostering economic expansion while mitigating the potential for future water and sewer rate increases.

The approved projects enhance system reliability and expand capacity, thereby strengthening the city's appeal for both commercial and residential development and stimulating economic growth. Moreover, the infusion of ARPA funding mitigates the strain on existing water and sewer enterprise funds, potentially minimizing any future increases in water and sewer rates.

DISCUSSION:

The Public Works Department has substantially completed its ongoing projects and is now proposing a new initiative to allocate funds for the update of the Water Sewer Master Plan and a rate study.

Please refer to the table below, which compares the original ARPA approval amounts with the proposed amended activity. This adjustment reflects actual or projected expenditures. Notably, a significant allocation has been earmarked for the Water and Sewer Master Plan and Rate Study. This funding has been made possible through cost savings realized in other ARPA activities and a reduction in funding originally 5 Packet Pg. 129
Action Item (ID # 6465) Meeting of July 31, 2024
designated for the storm water improvement project. The latter project, focused on trash capture, will be proposed for funding through Measure D LTA funds in a subsequent request.

CONCLUSION:

Approve the revised list of ARPA projects as presented. 5 Packet Pg. 130
City Council of the City of El Centro Meeting: 07/31/24 04:00 PM 1275 Main Street Department: Public Works
El Centro, CA 92243 Category: Award of Bid
Prepared By: Elizabeth Zarate
SCHEDULED Department Head: Abraham Campos
ACTION ITEM (ID # 6274) DOC ID: 6274
Discussion and Any Necessary Action Regarding the
Approval of an Agreement with Dudek for Services Relating to the Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Resolution No. 24- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF EL CENTRO APPROVING A CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH DUDEK FOR

DESIGN SERVICES RELATING TO THE WATER & SEWER MASTER PLAN AND COST OF SERVICE RATE STUDY.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No impact to the General Fund.

ARPA funding is proposed to be leveraged with water and wastewater funds for this major project, representing a strategic investment in infrastructure that results in enduring benefits for the community.

Project Budget Request
ARPA $900,000
Wastewater Enterprise Fund $170,000
Water Enterprise Fund $169,186
TOTAL $1,239,186
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

Goal #1 - Financial & Governance Stability & Sustainability Action 1.1 Review existing water, sewer, storm and solid waste rates to be sustainable and equitable.

Goal #2 - Environmental Sustainability & Infrastructure DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTORS LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKS, INSURANCE, ETC:

The city has done successful projects with the Consultant. Consultant is part of the City On-Call list.

BACKGROUND:

The city’s water and sewer master plan needs to be updated. The last El Centro water and sewer master plan was performed in 2008, over 16 years ago assuming conditions and growth projections that differ from today’s needs. In addition, the city last approved a water and sewer fee rate schedule in 2012, twelve years ago. The schedule included rate adjustments through 2016, with no adjustments in the last eight years.

Unlike many cities outside of our region, El Centro operates and maintains our own 6 Packet Pg. 131
Action Item (ID # 6274) Meeting of July 31, 2024
water and sewer treatment plants, together with over 100 miles of sewer collection mains and over 100 miles of water distribution mains. We do not rely on external water or sewer districts for this service. To do so, the city operates water and wastewater enterprise funds by charging residents for water and sewer services, which in turn funds the maintenance and operation of the treatment plants together with the distribution and collections systems previously described.

To fund the projected current needs and future growth projections, a Proposition 218 water and sewer rate study is proposed to be completed. The study performs a comprehensive analysis of the City’s cost to operate and maintain the water and wastewater systems. The study considers factors such as the financial plan, revenue requirements, and funding for capital project by considering the recommendations in the water and sewer master plan.

A sewer and water master plan is a comprehensive document that outlines the current state, future needs, and strategies for managing the city's treatment, supply and collection of water and wastewater in our city. These plans help with infrastructure planning, regulatory compliance, and risk management. They also help ensure that future residents and businesses will have adequate services based on projected growth.

Master plans are roadmaps that consist of a series of programs for a utility, such as our city, to undertake in the short, medium, and long terms. The programs guide the city's capital improvement projects (CIP) with respect to the treatment, distribution and collection of water and wastewater systems.

On February 6, 2024, City Council approved a request for proposals to update the water sewer master plan and performance of a water and sewer rate study.

DISCUSSION:

City staff received proposals on April 5, 2024 for the project. Dudek Consultants was the sole RFP submitter and presented a robust Request for Proposal response documenting a robust portfolio of master plans performed by Dudek for various jurisdictions. In this case, they have teamed up with NV5, a second major civil firm, who has historical and current knowledge of our city water plants. For the financial aspect, Dudek has teamed up with Raftelis Financial Consultants, a firm with vast expertise in rate studies.

The scope further includes a review of the water and sewer capacity fees and its calculation, which staff proposes to simplify and streamline in an effort to further attract development.

City Public Works management staff, in collaboration with City finance staff, conducted interviews with the Dudek team and determined that the team is highly knowledgeable in the subject matter. To validate the proposal fee, the public works director did a search for other jurisdictions contracts and their cost for similar work and also reviewed the proposed hours and associated fee per scope activity. We find Dudek’s comprehensive fee proposal reasonable, and thus recommend approval.
6 Packet Pg. 132
Action Item (ID # 6274) Meeting of July 31, 2024
The comprehensive project will provide a roadmap to enhance system reliability and expand capacity, thereby strengthening the city's appeal for both commercial and residential development and stimulating economic growth. Moreover, the infusion of ARPA funding mitigates the strain on existing water and sewer enterprise funds, potentially minimizing any future increases in water and sewer rates.

CONCLUSION:

Approve Resolution No. 24- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF EL CENTRO APPROVING A CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH DUDEK FOR

DESIGN SERVICES RELATING TO THE WATER & SEWER MASTER PLAN AND COST OF SERVICE RATE STUDY.

ATTACHMENTS:
· Resolution - Final (PDF)
· Agreement Final (not signed) (PDF)
· Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (PDF)
· Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (PDF)
· Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (PDF)
6 Packet Pg. 133
06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Reso/Water&SewerMaster
PlanSvcsRateStudy
RESOLUTION NO. 24 -

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO

APPROVING A CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH DUDEK FOR

DESIGN SERVICES RELATING TO THE WATER & SEWER MASTER

PLAN AND COST OF SERVICE RATE STUDY
WHEREAS, the City Council approved, and staff issued an RFP for design services relating to the Water & Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study (“Project”); and WHEREAS, after review of all submissions, staff recommends hiring Dudek; and WHEREAS, it therefore is necessary for the City Council to approve a Consulting Agreement with Dudek, for Design Services relating to the Project (hereinafter referred to as “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that its approval of the Agreement is in the best interest of the City of El Centro, California.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the foregoing is true, correct and adopted hereby.

2. That the City Council does hereby approve the Consulting Agreement between the City and Dudek, for Design Services relating to the Water & Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study.

3. That the City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, on behalf of the City of El Centro, California, and to take and all other necessary action to implement it.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California held on day of , 2024.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
By _____________________
Sylvia Marroquin, Mayor

6.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Resolution - Final (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Reso/Water&SewerMaster
PlanSvcsRateStudy
ATTEST:

By _____________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
By________________________________
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL ) ss

CITY OF EL CENTRO )
I, Norma Wyles, City Clerk of the City of El Centro, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24- was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the day of , 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

By__________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

6.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Resolution - Final (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
CONSULTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AND Dudek FOR DESIGN SERVICES RELATING TO Water & Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by the City of El Centro, (“City”) and Dudek, (“the Consultant”) for the Consultant to provide design services (“Consulting Services”) for the Water & Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study (“Project”).

City and Consultant each may be referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
City wishes to retain the services of a professional firm to provide the Consulting Services and has carried out a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) process to obtain such firm(s); and As confirmed through the City’s RFP process, Consultant has the expertise, experience and personnel necessary to provide the Consulting Services for the Project; and City and the Consultant now wish to enter into an agreement whereby the City will retain the Consultant to provide, and the Consultantshall provide, the Consulting Services for the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth, herein, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby set forth their mutual covenants and understandings as follows:

ARTICLE I

CONSULTING SERVICES

1.0 The above-listed recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference.

As used here, “days” means calendar days unless otherwise specified

1.1 Scope of Services.

The scope of services will include design, studies, plans and documents related to the design services for a Water & Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study as further described in Exhibit A - Scope of Work. attached and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

1.2 Contract Administrator.

The Public Works Department is the administrator for this Agreement. The Consultant shall provide the Consulting Services under the direction of the Public Works Director or designee (“Director”). The Director will communicate with the Consultant on all matters related to the administration of this Agreement and the Consultant’s performance of the Consulting Services rendered hereunder. When this Agreement refers to communications to or with the City, those

6.b
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
communications will be with the Director unless the Director or the Agreement specifies otherwise in writing.

1.3 City Modification of Scope of Services.

The City may, without invalidating this Agreement, order changes in any task by altering, adding to or deducting from the Consulting Services to be performed. All such changes shall be in writing and shall be performed in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. If any such changes cause an increase or decrease in the Consultant’s cost of, or the time required for the performance of any of the Consulting Services, the Consultant shall so notify the City in writing within 15 days of that increase or decrease. If appropriate, an equitable adjustment to the Consultant’s compensation may be made, provided that any adjustment must be pre-approved by the Parties in writing; the City’s approval shall come from the City Council.

1.4 Written Authorization.

Prior to performing any Consulting Services in connection with the Project, the Consultant shall obtain from the City a written authorization to proceed. The Consultant shall advise the City in writing immediately of any anticipated change in any task, fee schedule or time schedule, and shall obtain the City’s written consent to the change prior to making any changes. In no event shall the City’s consent be construed to relieve the Consultant from its duty to render all Consulting Services in accordance with applicable laws and accepted industry standards.

1.5 Confidentiality of Services.

All Consulting Services performed by the Consultant, including but not limited to all drafts, data, correspondence, proposals, reports and estimates compiled or composed by the Consultant, pursuant to this Agreement, are for the sole use of the City, its agents and employees. Neither the documents nor their contents shall be released to any third party without the prior written consent of the City. This provision does not apply to information that (a) was publicly known, or otherwise known to the Consultant, at the time that it was disclosed to the Consultant by the City, (b) subsequently becomes publicly known through no act or omission by the Consultant, (c) otherwise becomes known to the Consultant other than through disclosure by the City as needed to establish a defense, (d) is already in the possession of Consultant at the time of disclosure by City as shown by Consultant’s files and records immediately prior to the time of disclosure, (e) is obtained by Consultant from a third party without a breach of the third party’s obligations of confidentiality; (f) is independently developed by Consultant without use of or reference to City’s proprietary information, as shown by documents and other evidence in Consultant’s possession; or (g) is required by law to be disclosed by Consultant, provided that Consultant gives City prompt written notice of the requirement prior to disclosure, if legally permissible. Except for Subcontractors (as that term is defined in section 4.4), neither the documents nor their contents shall be released to any third party without the prior written consent of the City.

6.b
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

ARTICLE II

DURATION OF AGREEMENT

2.1 Term of Agreement.

This Agreement shall be effective as of the last signature date in this agreement and will remain in effect until the Consulting Services are completed, but in no event later than two (2) years from the date of approval and may be extended for up to (3) one (1) year extensions by mutual agreement, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. All days set out in this Agreement are calendar days unless otherwise provided.

2.2 Time of Essence.

The Parties agree that time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement, unless otherwise specified in this Agreement.

2.3 Notification of Delay.

The Consultant shall immediately notify the City in writing of any delay in completion of the Consulting Services. The written notice shall include an explanation of the cause for, and a reasonable estimate of the length of the delay. If the delay affects a material part of the Project, the City may exercise its rights under sections 2.5-2.9 of this Agreement.

2.4 Delay.

If delays in the performance of the Consulting Services are caused by unforeseen events beyond the control of the Parties, such delay may entitle the Consultant to a reasonable extension of time, but such delay shall not entitle the Consultant to damages or additional compensation.

The following conditions may constitute such a delay: pandemic, epidemic, war, changes in law or government regulations, labor disputes, strikes, fires, floods, adverse weather or other similar condition of the elements necessitating cessation of the Consultant’s work, inability to obtain materials, equipment or labor, required additional Consulting Services or other specific reasons agreed to between the City and the Consultant; provided, however, that (a) this provision shall not apply and the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for a delay caused by the acts or omissions of the Consultant; and (b) that a delay caused by the inability to obtain materials shall not entitle the Consultant to an extension of time unless the Consultant furnishes the City, in a timely manner, documentary proof, to the City’s satisfaction, of the inability to obtain materials.

2.5 City’s Right to Suspend for Convenience.

The City may, at its sole option and for its convenience, suspend all or any portion of the Consultant’s performance of the Consulting Services, for a reasonable period of time not to exceed six (6) months. In accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the City will give written notice to the Consultant of such suspension. In the event of such a suspension, in accordance with the provisions of Article III of this Agreement, the City shall pay to the Consultant a sum equivalent to the reasonable value of the Consulting Services the Consultant has performed up to the date of suspension. Thereafter, the City may rescind such suspension by giving written notice

6.b
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
of rescission to the Consultant. The City may then require the Consultant to resume performance of the Consulting Services in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; provided, however, that the Consultant shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to the length of the suspension, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties.

2.6 City’s Right to Terminate for Convenience.

The City may, at its sole option and for its convenience, terminate all or any portion of the Consulting Services agreed to pursuant to this Agreement by giving written notice of such termination to the Consultant. Such notice shall be delivered by certified mail with return receipt for delivery to the City. The termination of the Consulting Services shall be effective upon receipt of the notice by the Consultant. After termination of this Agreement, the Consultant shall complete any and all additional work necessary for the orderly filing of documents and closing of the Consultant’s Consulting Services under this Agreement. For services rendered in completing the work, the Consultant shall be entitled to fair and reasonable compensation for the Consulting Services performed by the Consultant up to the effective date of termination. After filing of documents and completion of performance, the Consultant shall deliver to the City all drawings, plans, calculations, specifications and other documents or records related to both the Project and to the Consultant’s Consulting Services on all task(s). By accepting payment for completion, filing and delivering documents as called for in this paragraph, the Consultant discharges the City of all of the City’s payment obligations under this Agreement.

2.7 City’s Right to Terminate for Default.

If the Consultant fails to adequately perform any obligation required by this Agreement, the Consultant’s failure constitutes a default (“Default”). If the Consultant fails to satisfactorily cure a Default within ten (10) days of receiving written notice from the City specifying the nature of the Default, the City immediately may cancel and/or terminate this Agreement, and terminate each and every right of the Consultant, and any person claiming any rights by or through the Consultant under this Agreement. The rights and remedies of the City enumerated in this section

2.7 are cumulative and shall not limit, waive or deny any of the City’s rights under any other provision of this Agreement, nor does this section 2.7 otherwise waive or deny any right or remedy, at law or in equity, existing as of the date of this Agreement or hereinafter enacted or established, that may be available to the City against the Consultant.

2.8 Consultant Right to Terminate for Default.

In the event the City materially defaults in the performance of any of its duties or obligations hereunder, which default is not substantially cured within thirty (30) calendar days after notice is given to the City specifying the default, then the Consultant may, upon giving notice thereof to the City, immediately terminate this Agreement for cause.

6.b
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

2.9 City’s Right to Terminate for Bankruptcy or Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors.

Subject to the provisions of applicable law, if the Consultant files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, is adjudicated bankrupt or makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, the City may at its option and without further notice to or demand upon the Consultant, immediately cancel and/or terminate this Agreement and terminate each and every right of the Consultant and any person claiming any rights by or through the Consultant. The rights and remedies of the City enumerated in this section 2.8 are cumulative and shall not limit, waive or deny any of the City’s rights under any other provision of this Agreement, nor does this section 2.8 otherwise waive or deny any right or remedy, at law or in equity, existing as of the date of this Agreement or hereinafter enacted or established, that may be available to the City against the Consultant.

ARTICLE III

COMPENSATION

3.1 General.

The City shall pay the Consultant for all the Consulting Services and all expenses related to performance under this Agreement in an amount not to exceed that set forth in the fee schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B.” The Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for the Consulting Services under this Agreement, whether within the scope of work for any task, or as additional services, based on the fee schedule. City agrees to pay Consultant within approximately 30 days of invoice receipt.

3.2 Annual Rate Increase.

No sooner than 1-year from the date of contract execution, Consultant may request annual rate increases in line with the CPI-U for the nearest urban area per the Department of Labor Statistics to where the work is being completed, or by 3% annually, whichever is higher. Any such increase may be granted by City in its sole discretion.

3.3 Manner of Payment.

The Consultant shall complete all work required by this Agreement for a not to exceed sum of one million two hundred thirty-nine thousand and one-hundred eight-six dollars and 00/100 cents ($1,239,186.00).

3.3.1 Manner of Payment. The Consultant shall bill all fees and expenses incurred in accordance with this Agreement directly to the City on a monthly basis. Consultant shall further provide a report with each invoice that includes the total cumulative Agreement expenses.

3.4 Additional Services.

If the City requires additional Consulting Services (“Additional Services”) beyond those set out in Exhibit “A”, except for Additional Costs (as that term is defined in section 3.6), the

6.b
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
Consultant will be paid an additional fee. Additional Services shall be in accordance with the rates provided in the fee schedule. The City and the Consultant must agree in writing upon such fee prior to the Consultant beginning the Additional Services.

3.5 Changed Conditions
Should City or Consultant determine there is a need to reconsider provisions of this Agreement in light of occurrences or discoveries that were not originally contemplated by or known to the Consultant or City that call for contract renegotiation, the City or Consultant shall identify the changed condition necessitating renegotiation and the Consultant and the City, shall promptly and in good faith enter into renegotiation of this agreement. If terms cannot be agreed to, the parties agree that either Party has the absolute right to terminate this agreement.

3.6 Additional Costs.

Additional costs are those costs that can be reasonably determined to be related to the Consultant’s negligent errors or omissions, and may include Consultant, City or Subcontractor (as that term is defined in section 4.4) overhead, construction, materials, demolition and related costs (“Additional Costs”). The Consultant shall not be paid for the Consulting Services required due to the Consultant’s negligent errors or omissions, and the Consultant shall be responsible for any direct damages associated with such negligent errors or omissions. These Additional Costs may be deducted from monies due, or that become due, to the Consultant. If, due to Consultant’s error, any required item or component of the project is omitted from the Consultant’s construction documents, the Consultant shall be responsible for paying the cost to add such item or component to the extent that such item or component would have otherwise been necessary to the project or otherwise adds value or betterment to the project. In no event will the Consultant be responsible for any cost or expense that provides betterment, upgrade or enhancement of the project.

ARTICLE IV
CONSULTANT’S OBLIGATIONS

4.1 Industry Standards.

In addition to the Consultant’s covenants described in Article VI hereof, the Consultant agrees that the Consulting Services rendered under this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the degree of care and skill customarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances in the same or similar locality at the time of performance. Where approval by the City, the City Manager or other representatives of the City is required, it is understood to be general approval only and does not relieve the Consultant of responsibility for complying with applicable laws, codes and good consulting practices in effect at contract execution and as those may be modified from time to time.

4.2 Right to Audit.

4.2.1 Access. The City retains the right to review and audit, and the reasonable right of access to Consultant’s and all Subcontractor’s (as that term is defined in section 4.4)

6.b
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
premises to review and audit the Consultant’s compliance with the provisions of this Agreement (“City’s Right”). The City’s Right includes the right to inspect and photocopy same, and to retain copies, outside of the Consultant’s premises, of any and all records with appropriate safeguards, if such retention is deemed necessary by City in its sole discretion. This information shall be kept by the City in strictest confidence allowed by law.

4.2.2 Audit. The City’s Right includes the right to examine any and all books, records, documents and any other evidence of procedures and practices that the City determines are necessary to discover and verify that the Consultant is in compliance with all requirements under this Agreement.

4.2.2.1 Cost Audit. If there is a claim for additional compensation or for Additional Services, the City’s Right includes the right to examine books, records, documents and any and all other evidence and accounting procedures and practices that the City determines are necessary to discover and verify all direct and indirect costs, of whatever nature, which are claimed to have been incurred or anticipated to be incurred.

4.2.2.1.1 Accounting Records. The Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records in accordance with generally-accepted accounting practices in the industry. The Consultant shall make available to the City for review and audit all Project related accounting records and documents and any other financial data. Upon the City’s request, the Consultant shall submit exact duplicates of originals of all requested records to the City.

4.2.2.1.2 Recovery of Audit Costs. The City may recover its costs of audit when the auditor shows that the Consultant has not been in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement.

4.2.3 City’s Right--Binding on Subcontractors. The Consultant shall include the City’s Right as described in section 4.2 (including its subsections), in any and all of their subcontracts, and shall ensure that these sections are binding upon all Subcontractors (as that term is defined in section 4.4).

4.3 Insurance.

The Consultant shall maintain prior to the beginning of and for the duration of this Agreement insurance coverage as specified in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein.

4.4 Subcontractors.

The Consultant’s hiring of or retaining any third parties (singularly, “Subcontractor” in the plural, “Subcontractors”) to perform services related to the Project (“Subcontractor Services”) is subject to prior written approval by the City. The Consultant shall list on the subcontractors list all Subcontractors known to the Consultant at the time this Agreement is entered. If at any time after this Agreement is entered into the Consultant identifies a need for additional Subcontractor Services, the Consultant shall give written notice to the City of the need, at least forty-five (45) days before entering into a contract for such Subcontractor Services. The Consultant’s notice shall

6.b
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
include a justification, a description of the scope of work and an estimate of all costs for the Subcontractor Services. The Consultant may request that the City reduce the forty-five (45) day notice period. The City agrees to consider such requests in good faith.

4.4.1 Subcontractor Contract. All contracts entered into between the Consultant and a Subcontractor shall contain the information as described in sections 4.6, 4.7 and,

4.10.2 (as well as any other information, terms and conditions required elsewhere in this Agreement to be included in said agreements) and shall also provide as follows:

4.4.1.1 For each design professional Subcontractor, each Subcontractor shall disclose or obtain insurance policies which shall be kept in full force and effect during any and all work on this Project and for the duration of this Agreement. Each Subcontractor shall obtain, and the Consultant shall require the Subcontractor to obtain, all policies described in Exhibit C.

4.4.1.2 The Consultant is obligated to pay the Subcontractor out of amounts paid by the City to the Consultant, not later than fourteen (14) working days from the Consultant’s receipt of payment from the City. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to impair the right of the Consultant and any Subcontractor to negotiate fair and reasonable pricing and payment provisions among themselves.

4.4.1.3 In the case of a deficiency in the performance of Subcontractor Services, the Consultant shall notify the City in writing of any withholding of payment to the Subcontractor, specifying: (a) the amount withheld, (b) the specific cause under the terms of the subcontract for withholding payment, (c) the connection between the cause for withholding payment and the amount withheld and (d) the remedial action the Subcontractor must take in order to receive the amount withheld. Once the Subcontractor corrects the deficiency, the Consultant shall pay the Subcontractor the amount withheld within fourteen (14) working days of the Consultant’s receipt of the City’s next payment.

4.4.1.4 In any dispute between the Consultant and a Subcontractor, the City shall not be made a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding to resolve the dispute. The Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City as described in Article VI of this Agreement in any dispute between the Consultant and a Subcontractor should the City be made a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding to resolve the dispute in violation of this position.

4.4.1.5 The Subcontractor is bound to the same requirements as the primary Consultant for assurances to the City regarding non-discrimination covenants set forth in section

4.6. 4.5 Contract Activity Report.

The Consultant shall submit statistical information to the City as requested in the City’s contract activity report (“the Contract Activity Report”). The statistical information shall include the amount of subcontracting provided by firms during the period covered by the Contract Activity Report. With the Contract Activity Report, the Consultant shall provide an invoice from each Subcontractor listed in the report. The Consultant agrees to issue payment to each firm listed in

6.b
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
the Report within fourteen (14) working days of receiving payment from the City for Subcontractor Services as described in section 4.4.1.

4.6 Non-Discrimination Requirements.

The Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, gender identity, gender expression, religious creed, national origin, color, sexual orientation, age, disability (mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, ancestry, medical condition (cancer and genetic characteristics), genetic information, marital status, gender identity, military or veteran status or sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth and medical conditions related thereto) in the solicitation, selection, hiring or treatment of Subcontractors, vendors or suppliers. The Consultant shall provide equal opportunity for Subcontractors to participate in subcontracting opportunities.

The Consultant understands and agrees that violation of this clause shall be considered a material breach of this Agreement and may result in contract termination, debarment or other sanctions.

This language shall be in contracts between the Consultant and any Subcontractors, vendors and suppliers.

4.7 Drug-Free Workplace.

The Consultant agrees to ensure a drug-free workplace. The Consultant shall certify to the City that it will provide a drug-free workplace by submitting a Consultant certification for a drugfree workplace form.

4.7.1 Consultant’s Notice to Employees. The Consultant shall publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the work place, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of the prohibition.

4.7.2 Drug-Free Awareness Program. The Consultant shall establish a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about all of the following:

4.7.2.1 The dangers of drug abuse in the work place.

4.7.2.2 The policy of maintaining a drug-free work place.

4.7.2.3 Available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs.

4.7.2.4 The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.

4.7.3 Posting the Statement. In addition to section 4.7.1 above, the Consultant shall post the drug-free policy in a prominent place.

4.7.4 Subcontractor’s Agreements. The Consultant further certifies that each contract for Subcontractor Services for this Project shall contain language that binds the

6.b
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
Subcontractor to comply with the provisions of section 4.7 of this Agreement. The Consultant and any Subcontractors shall be individually responsible for their own drug-free work place program.

4.8 Americans with Disabilities Act Statement.

The Consultant shall certify that any construction documents and specifications meet current Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, known as the California Building Standards Code (“Title 24”) requirements and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (“ADAAG”) and are in general compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

When a conflict exists between Title 24 and ADAAG, the most restrictive requirement shall be followed.

4.9 Product Endorsement.

The Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any advertisement identifying or referring to the City as the user of a product or service requires the prior written approval of the City. The Consultant may not use any City logo without prior written City approval.

4.10 Conflict of Interest.

The Consultant is subject to all Federal, State and local conflict of interest laws, regulations and policies applicable to public contracts and procurement practices, including but not limited to California Government Code sections 1090 et seq. and 81000 et seq. If required to do so by Exhibit “D”, attached hereto and incorporated herein, and which may be amended from time-to-time by the City), the Consultant shall complete one (1) or more statements of economic interest disclosing relevant financial interests (“Consultant’s Statement of Financial Interest”) and submit that to the City Clerk in a timely manner.

4.10.1 The Consultant shall establish and make known to its employees and agents appropriate safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is, or that gives the appearance of being, motivated by the desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business or other relationships.

4.10.2 The Consultant’s personnel shall not accept gratuities or any other favors from any Subcontractors or potential Subcontractors. The Consultant shall not recommend or specify any product, supplier or contractor with whom the Consultant has a direct or indirect financial or organizational interest or relationship that would violate conflict of interest laws, regulations or policies.

4.10.3 If the Consultant violates any conflict of interest laws or any of these provisions in section 4.10, the violation shall be grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement. Further, the violation subjects the Consultant to liability to the City for attorneys’ fees and all damages sustained as a result of the violation.

4.10.4 Consultant’s duties and services under this Agreement shall not include preparing or assisting the City with any portion of the City’s preparation of a request for proposals, request for qualifications, or any other solicitation regarding a subsequent or additional contract

6.b
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
with the City. The City shall at all times retain responsibility for public contracting, including with respect to any subsequent phase of this project. Consultant’s participation in the planning, discussions, or drawing of project plans or specifications shall be limited to conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications. Consultant shall cooperate with the City to ensure that all bidders for a subsequent contract on any subsequent phase of this project have access to the same information, including all conceptual, preliminary, or initial plans or specifications prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement.”

4.11 Mandatory Assistance.

If a third-party dispute or litigation, or both, arises out of, or relates in any way to, the Consulting Services provided under this Agreement, upon the City’s request, the Consultant and its agents, officers and employees agree to assist in resolving the dispute or litigation (“Mandatory Assistance”). The Mandatory Assistance includes, but is not limited to, providing professional consultations, attending mediations, arbitrations, depositions, trials or any event related to the dispute resolution and/or litigation.

4.12 Compensation for Mandatory Assistance.

The City will compensate the Consultant for fees incurred for providing Mandatory Assistance as Additional Services under section 3.3. If, however, the fees incurred for the Mandatory Assistance are determined, through resolution of the third-party dispute or litigation, or both, to be attributable in whole, or in part, to the negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its agents, officers or employees, the Consultant shall pay back the City. The City is then entitled to repayment of all fees paid to the Consultant, its agents, officers and employees for Mandatory Assistance.

4.13 Attorneys’ Fees Related to Mandatory Assistance.

In providing the City with dispute or litigation assistance, the Consultant or its agents, officers and employees may incur expenses and/or costs. The Consultant agrees that any reasonable attorneys’ fees it may incur as a result of assistance provided under section 4.11 are not reimbursable.

4.14 Retention of Records.

Consultant is required to keep all related accounting records and documents under this Agreement for a period of not less than five (5) calendar years after completion of all projects hereunder. Upon the City’s request, the Consultant shall submit exact duplicates of originals of all requested records to the City.

4.15 Levine Act Statement Consultant shall execute and return the Levine Ac statement attached and incorporated as Exhibit “C”

ARTICLE V
CITY’S OBLIGATIONS

6.b
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

5.1 Ownership of Documents.

Whether or not the Consultant has received any compensation for the Consulting Services performed, all documents, including but not limited to, original plans, studies, sketches, drawings, computer printouts and disk files and specifications prepared in connection with or related to any task or Consulting Services shall be the property of the City. The City’s ownership of these documents includes use of, reproduction or reuse of and all incidental rights, whether or not the work for which they were prepared has been performed. The City’s ownership entitlement includes ownership of any and all work product completed. This section 5.1 shall apply whether the Consultant’s Consulting Services are terminated by the completion of the Project or in accordance with other provisions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph or Agreement, the Consultant shall have the right to make copies of all such plans, studies, sketches, drawings, computer printouts and disk files and specifications at its sole expense.

The Consultant shall not be responsible for damage caused by subsequent changes to or uses of the plans or specifications. Any reuse or modification of the project documents by the City shall be at the City’s sole risk.

5.2 Additional Consultants or Contractors.

The City reserves the right to employ, at its own expense, such additional Consultants or contractors as the City deems necessary to perform work or to provide the Consulting Services on the Project.

5.3 Employment of City Staff.

This Agreement may be unilaterally and immediately terminated by the City, at its sole discretion, if the Consultant employs an individual who, within the last twelve (12) months immediately preceding such employment did, in the individual’s capacity as an officer or employee of the City, participate in, negotiate with or otherwise have an influence on the recommendation made to the City Council or City Manager in connection with the selection of the Consultant.

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION AND DEFENSE
A. 6.1 Indemnity
To the fullest extent permitted by law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold harmless CITY and any and all of its officials, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable legal counsel’s fees and costs, caused in whole or in part by the negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of CONSULTANT, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants (or any City or individual that CONSULTANT shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT’s duty to indemnify and hold harmless CITY shall not extend to the CITY’s sole or active negligence.

6.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
B. Duty to defend
In the event the CITY, its officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from the performance of the services encompassed by this AGREEMENT, and upon demand by CITY, CONSULTANT shall defend the CITY at CONSULTANT’s cost or at CITY’s option, to reimburse CITY for its costs of defense, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the defense of such matters to the extent the matters arise from, relate to or are caused by CONSULTANT’s negligent acts, errors or omissions. Payment by CITY is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between CONSULTANT and CITY, as to whether liability arises from the sole or active negligence of the CITY or its officers, employees, or agents, CONSULTANT will be obligated to pay for CITY’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the CITY as solely or actively negligent.

CONSULTANT will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation

ARTICLE VII

MISCELLANEOUS

7.1 Notices.

Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:

To CITY: City of El Centro
Attn: Public Works Director/City Engineer
1275 West Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243
Attention: City Clerk
Norma Wyles
1275 West Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243
To CONSULTANT: Dudek
Bob Ohlund, PE
605 Third Street
Encinitas, CA 92024

6.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

7.2 Headings.

All article headings are for convenience only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

7.3 Non-Assignment.

The Consultant shall not assign the obligations under this Agreement, whether by express assignment or by sale of the company, nor any monies due or to become due, without the City’s prior written approval. Any assignment in violation of this paragraph shall constitute a Default and is grounds for immediate termination of this Agreement, at the sole discretion of the City. In no event shall any putative assignment create a contractual relationship between the City and any putative assignee.

7.4 Independent Contractors.

The Consultant and any Subcontractors employed by the Consultant shall be independent contractors and not employees or agents of the City. Any provisions of this Agreement that may appear to give the City any right to direct the Consultant concerning the details of performing the Consulting Services, or to exercise any control over such performance, shall mean only that the Consultant shall follow the direction of the City concerning the end results of the performance.

Without receiving the Consultant’s written permission, the City agrees not to hire, retain or contract with any employee of the Consultant who performs services for the City under this Agreement for one (1) year from the date this Agreement is terminated.

7.5 Consultant and Subcontractor Principals for Consulting Services.

It is understood that this Agreement is for unique Consulting Services. Retention of the Consultant is based on the particular professional expertise of the individuals rendering the services set forth in each task. Accordingly, portions of the described service may not be delegated to other members of the team or Subcontractors without prior written consent by the City. It is mutually agreed that CONSULTANT NAME is the principal person responsible for delivery of all Consulting Services and may not be removed from any tasks without the City’s prior written approval. In the event CONSULTANT NAME becomes unavailable for any reason, the City must be consulted as to any replacements. Further, the City reserves the right, after consultation with the Consultant, to require removal of the Consultant’s employees or agents.

7.6 Covenants and Conditions.

All provisions of this Agreement expressed as conditions on the part of the City or the Consultant shall be deemed to be covenants and conditions.

7.7 Compliance with Controlling Law.

6.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
The Consultant shall comply with laws, ordinances, regulations and policies of the Federal, State and local governments applicable to this Agreement in effect at execution of the contract as those may be modified from time to time. In addition, the Consultant shall comply immediately with all directives issued by the City or its authorized representatives under authority of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations. The laws of the State of California shall govern and control the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

7.8 Jurisdiction, Venue and Attorneys’ Fees.

The venue for any suit or proceeding concerning this Agreement, the interpretation or application of any of its terms or any related disputes shall be in the County of Imperial, State of California. If either Party brings an action to enforce the terms of this Agreement or declare rights under this Agreement, the prevailing Party in any such action, on trial or appeal, shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs as fixed by the court to be paid by the losing Party.

7.9 Successors in Interest.

This Agreement and all rights and obligations created by this Agreement shall be in force and effect whether or not any Parties to the Agreement have been succeeded by another entity, and all rights and obligations created by this Agreement shall be vested and binding on any Party’s successor in interest.

7.10 Integration.

This Agreement and the exhibits and references incorporated into this Agreement fully express all understandings of the Parties concerning the matters covered in this Agreement. No change, alteration or modification of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, and no verbal understanding of the Parties, their officers, agents or employees, shall be valid unless made in the form of a written change agreed to in writing by both Parties or an amendment to this Agreement agreed to by both Parties. All prior negotiations and agreements are merged into this Agreement.

7.11 Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute a single signed original as though all Parties had executed the same page.

7.12 No Waiver.

No failure of either the City or the Consultant to insist upon the strict performance by the other of any covenant, term or condition of this Agreement, nor any failure to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach of any covenant, term, or condition of this Agreement, shall constitute a waiver of any such breach of such covenant, term or condition. No waiver of any breach shall affect or alter this Agreement, and each and every covenant, condition and term hereof shall continue in full force and effect to any existing or subsequent breach.

6.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

7.13 Severability.

The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision of this Agreement shall not render any other provision of this Agreement unenforceable, invalid, or illegal and the City Council declares that it .

7.14 Municipal Powers.

Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as a limitation upon the powers of the City as a charter city of the State of California.

7.15 Drafting Ambiguities.

The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the decision of whether or not to seek advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision that is the sole responsibility of each Party. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor of or against either Party by reason of the extent to which each Party participated in the drafting of the Agreement.

7.16 Signing Authority.

The representative for each Party signing on behalf of a corporation, partnership, joint venture or governmental entity hereby declares that authority has been obtained to sign on behalf of the corporation, partnership, joint venture or entity and agrees to hold the other Party or Parties hereto harmless if it is later determined that such authority does not exist.

7.17 Conflicts between Terms.

If an apparent conflict or inconsistency exists between the main body of this Agreement and the exhibits, the main body of this Agreement shall control. If a conflict exists between an applicable Federal, State, or local law, rule, regulation, order or code and this Agreement, the law, rule, regulation, order or code shall control. Varying degrees of stringency among the main body of this Agreement, the exhibits, and laws, rules, regulations, orders or codes are not deemed conflicts, and the most stringent requirement shall control. Each Party shall notify the other immediately upon the identification of any apparent conflict or inconsistency concerning this Agreement.

7.18 Non-Appropriation.

This Agreement is based on the availability of public funding on the part of the City. In the event of unavailability or non-appropriation of funds, the City may either agree to make up the shortfall in a manner of its choosing or terminate the Agreement, without penalty, after written notice to the Consultant. Should the City elect to terminate the Agreement, it shall compensate the Consultant for the work it has performed up to the date of termination.

6.b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

ARTICLE VIII

CONTENTS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND PROPOSAL
Consultant is bound by the contents of City's Request for Proposal, Exhibit "F” hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the contents of the proposal submitted by the Consultant, Exhibit "A" hereto. In the event of conflict, the requirements of CITY's Request for Proposals and this Agreement shall take precedence over those contained in the Consultant's proposals. The incorporation of the Consultant’s proposal shall be for the scope of services to be provided only, and any other terms and conditions included in such proposal shall have no force and effect on this Agreement or the relationship between Consultant and/or City, unless expressly agreed to in writing.

ARTICLE IX

AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by the City Council of the City of El Centro, acting by and through the City Manager, authorizing such execution, and by the Consultant.

THE CITY OF EL CENTRO
Date: _________________ By: _____________________________ Cedric Ceseña, City Manager
ATTEST:
_________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY I can legally bind CONSULTANT, and that I have read all of this Agreement, this day of , 20 .

Date: _________________ By: _____________________________ Joseph Monaco, President and CEO

6.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
I HEREBY APPROVE the form and legality of the foregoing Agreement this day of 20 .

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Office of the City Attorney
By ________________________________
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

6.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24
-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF WORK

6.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24
-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
EXHIBIT B – FEE SCHEDULE

6.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting CONSULTANT’s indemnification of CITY, and prior to commencement of Work, CONSULTANT shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this AGREEMENT, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to CITY.

General liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.

Automobile liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this AGREEMENT, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

Professional liability (errors & omissions) insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this AGREEMENT, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this AGREEMENT and CONSULTANT agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this AGREEMENT.

Workers’ compensation insurance. CONSULTANT shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).

CONSULTANT shall submit to CITY, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of CITY, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

Umbrella or excess liability insurance. CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain an umbrella or excess liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury and property damage liability coverage at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth above, including commercial general liability and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason;

6.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
• Pay on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; • Policies shall “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and • Insureds under primary policies shall also be insureds under the umbrella or excess policies.

Other provisions or requirements
Proof of insurance. CONSULTANT shall provide certificates of insurance to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY at all times during the term of this contract. CITY reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

Duration of coverage. CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by CONSULTANT, his agents, representatives, employees or sub-Consultants.

Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by CONSULTANT shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by CITY shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of CITY before the CITY’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

CITY’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this AGREEMENT does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, CITY has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by CITY will be promptly reimbursed by CONSULTANT or CITY will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from CONSULTANT payments. In the alternative, CITY may cancel this AGREEMENT.

Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.

Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement, except for professional liability, shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow CONSULTANT or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. CONSULTANT hereby waives its

6.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
own right of recovery against CITY, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its sub-Consultants.

Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the CITY to inform CONSULTANT of noncompliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the CITY nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY.

Notice of cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to CITY with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage.

Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.

Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to CITY and approved of in writing.

Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

Pass through clause. CONSULTANT agrees to ensure that its sub-Consultants, sub-contractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by CONSULTANT, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. CONSULTANT agrees that upon request, all agreements with Consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to CITY for review.

CITY’s right to revise specifications. The CITY reserves the right at any time during the term of the contract to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the CONSULTANT ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial

6.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
additional cost to the CONSULTANT, the CITY and CONSULTANT may renegotiate CONSULTANT’s compensation.

Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY.

CITY reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by CITY.

Timely notice of claims. CONSULTANT shall give CITY prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from CONSULTANT’s performance under this AGREEMENT, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

Additional insurance. CONSULTANT shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

Claims-made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if any of the required policies are written on a claims-made basis:
a. The Retroactive Date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement or the beginning of the contracted work.
b. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work. c. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date that precedes the date of this Agreement, Consultant must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of the Agreement or the work. The Public City shall have the right to exercise, at the Consultant's sole cost and expense, any extended reporting provisions of the policy, if the Consultant cancels or does not renew the coverage.
d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City prior to the commencement of any work under this Agreement.

6.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy

EXHIBIT D

CONSULTANT FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
1 Consultant will comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitations, City’s Conflict of Interest Code (on file in the City Clerk’s Office) as required by Section 4.10 of this Agreement. It is incumbent upon the Consultant to notify the City pursuant to Sections 7.1 and 7.5 of any staff changes relating to this Agreement. The City Manager has made the following determination and Consultant, by his/her signature, acknowledges said determination. 2 A. In accomplishing the scope of services of this Agreement, all officers, employees and/or agents of Consultant will be performing a very limited and closely supervised function, and, therefore, unlikely to have a conflict of interest arise. No disclosures are required of any officers, employees, and/or agents of Consultant. Consultant duties are as follows:

Cedric Ceseña, City Manager Consultant Signature & Title B. In accomplishing the scope of services of this Agreement, Consultant will be performing a specialized or general service for the City, and there is substantial likelihood that the Consultant may make or participate in making a governmental decision, which may have a foreseeable material effect on a financial interest. As a result, the Consultant shall be subject to the Disclosure Category “Consultant” of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.

Cedric Ceseña, City Manager Consultant Signature & Title 1 Title 2, Division 6. California Code of Regulations Section 18701(a)(2). Pursuant to a contract with a local government City, a Consultant shall be required to file a Statement of Economic Interest if that Consultant will: “(A) Make a government decision whether to: (1) Approve a rate, rule or regulation; (2) Adopt or enforce a law; (3) Issue, deny, suspend or revoke any permit, license, application, certificate, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (4) Authorize the City to enter into, modify or renew a contract provided it is the type of contract which requires City approval; (5) Grant City approval to a contract which requires City approval and which the City is the party or to the specifications for such contract; (6) Grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; or (7) Adopt, or grant approval of policies, standards or guidelines for the City or for any subdivision thereof; or (B) Serves in a staff capacity with the City and in that capacity participates in making a governmental decision as defined in regulation 18702.2 or performs the same or substantially all the same duties for the City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in the City’s Conflict of Interest Code, under Governmental Code Section 87302.” 2 Disclosure by Consultants: Consultants shall be included in the list of designated employees and shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in the City’s adopted Conflict of Interest Code, subject to the following limitations: The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular Consultant, although a “designated position”, is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and closely supervised, and, thus, is not required to comply with the disclosure requirements in the City’s adopted Conflict of Interest Code. Such written determination shall include a description of the Consultant’s duties.

The City Manager’s determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as the City’s adopted Conflict of Interest Code.

6.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
EXHIBIT “E”
Levine Act Statement
California Government Code § 84308, commonly referred to as the “Levine Act,” precludes an officer of a local government agency from participating in the award of a contract if he or she receives any political contributions totaling more than $250 in the 12 months preceding the pendency of the contract award, and for three months following the final decision, from the person or company awarded the contract.

This prohibition applies to contributions to the officer, or received by the officer on behalf of any other officer, or on behalf of any candidate for office or on behalf of any committee.

City of El Centro Council Members as of the date of this RFP/Agreement:

Sylvia Marroquin
Martha Cardenas-Singh
Sonia Carter
Tomas Oliva
Edgard Garcia

1. Have you or your company, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, made any political contributions of more than $250 to any City of El Centro Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the issuance of this RFP? _____YES NO
If yes, please identify the Council Member:

2. Do you or your company, or any agency on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make any political contributions of more than $250 to any City of El Centro Council Member in the three months following the award of the contract? _____YES NO
If yes, please identify the Council Member:

Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude City of El Centro from awarding a contract to your firm. It does, however, preclude the identified Council Member from participating in the contract award process for this contract.

DATE (SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL)
(TYPE OR WRITE APPROPRIATE NAME, TITLE)
(TYPE OR WRITE NAME OF COMPANY)
01/2024

6.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 06/2024/cdz/A24
-0113/Agrmt/Water&Sewer
MasterPlanSvcsRateStudy
EXHIBIT “F”
CONSULTANT’S PROPOSAL

6.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Agreement Final (not signed) (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 10 Scope of Services

WATER MASTER PLAN
Task W1: Water Master Plan Project Management
Good project management and quality control are vital to completing any project, including kickoff meetings, monthly progress meetings, and City meetings. We will provide monthly progress reports at each meeting, including a schedule update.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one in-person project kickoff meeting at City offices (both Water and Sewer). ▪ There will be 14 virtual bimonthly project status meetings for the Water Master Plan. ▪ There will be four virtual City staff meetings.
▪ There will be two in-person City Council presentations for the Water Master Plan document and Water Rate Study
Deliverables:
▪ Monthly progress reports
▪ Updated schedules
▪ Kickoff and status meeting agenda and minutes
Task W2: Review of Land Use and Previous Master Planning Documents The project will commence with a data review task to understand the status of key resources used in this study.

This task consists of collecting and reviewing relevant data provided by the City or obtained elsewhere for this project. Dudek will review and incorporate information from the City’s prior Water Master Plan and 2020 Urban Water Management Plan to retain historical information. Anticipated data to collect includes the City’s water infrastructure GIS, as-builts and construction drawings, reservoir information, General Plan, Strategic Plan, land use data, and other relevant planning documents and information.

Dudek will compile a data request list for information not provided during the proposal process and present it at the kickoff meeting. In addition, Dudek will prepare and maintain a list of items identified by the City or requested by Dudek indicating the item(s) requested, a person responsible for collecting the information, when it is needed, and when it was provided to Dudek.

Task W3: Water Regulatory and Policy Review
The project team will review federal and state water regulations as well as Chapter 28 of the City’s municipal code. Technical Memorandum No. 3 will include discussion of relevant current and anticipated regulations and their implications on the City’s water production. Emerging contaminants, like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), will also be discussed along with recommendations for additional water quality sampling and treatment.

Assumptions:
▪ The City will make available to the Dudek team all permits related to the operation of the WTP and the distribution system.
▪ Raw and treated water quality will be available for review.

EXHIBIT A 6.c
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 11 Deliverables:
▪ Technical Memorandum No. 3 – Water Regulatory and Policy Review Task W4: Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment
Dudek will conduct visual assessments of major assets of the WTP to review their condition, integrity, and compliance with current code requirements. Field investigation and condition assessment of the WTP will be based on major WTP assets with major assets grouped together per treatment plant process. Major components of the electrical systems, including Service Entrance Section (SES), switchboards, panelboards, Automatic Transfer Switches (ATS), standby generators will be reviewed. Control system major components, including, Programmable Logic Control (PLC) local control panels, pump control panels, and telemetry antennas will also be inspected. Field evaluation at the original WTP will be limited to equipment that supports the raw water ponds, raw water lift station, and finished water distribution pump station, as the rest of the original WTP is no longer in service. Dudek will review the condition assessment reports performed on the original WTP and 21 mgd WTP.

Evaluation of the original WTP pump stations, the La Brucherie Booster Pump Station and the 21 mgd WTP will include recommendations for upgrade and replacement of systems and capacities.

Dudek staff will meet with City operations and engineering staff prior to the inspections in a pre-inspection workshop to discuss known issues, improvement histories, and operator preferences. Based on this condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and areas of concern to maintain operations. This condition assessment and evaluation of the WTP will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets. Dudek will develop recommended improvements to improve the service life of major assets at the WTP as well as improvements required to meet future capacity requirements and current state mandates and regulations. Budgetary cost estimates for recommended upgrades, replacements, and expansions will be provided. Each recommendation will be listed in priority order. This data will be used to recommend appropriate upgrades for each facility.

Assumptions:
▪ Dudek will receive City support for access to the three pump stations, original WTP, and 21 mgd WTP facilities, including electrical/telemetry panels, buildings and enclosures, WTP processes, and SCADA.
▪ Dudek will conduct one pre-inspection workshop with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site visits.
▪ Two days of inspection will be required.
▪ A list of major asset with installation dates will be provided by City staff in a consolidated electronic form. Condition assessment of WTP major assets will be determined by visual inspection and operational/repair/rehabilitation history provided by City staff.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum summarizing the findings of the WTP field investigations, documentation of deficiencies, and our recommended improvements and associated cost estimates
Task W5: Water Storage Condition Assessment
We shall participate in a maximum of two site investigations (five reservoirs total at two different sites) to perform structural condition assessments of each reservoir. The assessment work is anticipated to be performed while the reservoirs are in operation. We shall complete field assessment forms, obtain field measurements and photograph structural elements of the reservoirs. Structural condition ratings shall be assigned to each structural

6.c
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 12 element assessed. Structural elements to be assessed include steel shells, baseplate, roof plate, coatings, concrete ringwall foundation, stability, anchorage, equipment/pipe supports, appurtenances, handrailing, platforms/subframing, and equipment anchorage. Additionally, raw water pond assessments will include concrete slope and lining assessments. Investigation methods shall be nondestructive in nature and shall consist primarily of visual observations of the exterior and interior surfaces where possible through access/roof hatches.

Investigations will be limited to the use of tools such as a ball-peen hammer for concrete sounding, a pit depth gauge to determine metallic and concrete cover loss, an ultrasonic thickness gauge, calipers, a tape measure, and similar hand tools. Rebar imaging and/or destructive testing such as concrete coring will not be performed as part of the assessment.

All investigations will be performed in accordance with current California Building Code recommendations for assessment work and will adhere to the suggested assessment approaches and techniques as detailed in the following code and standards documents:
▪ American Concrete Institute (ACI) 201.R-08, “Guide for Conducting a Visual Inspection of Concrete in Service” ▪ ACI 364.1R-19, “Guide for Assessment of Concrete Structures Before Rehabilitation” ▪ ACI 562-19, “Code Requirements for Assessment, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Structures” ▪ American Petroleum Institute (API) 653, “Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction” ▪ AWWA M42, “Steel Water Storage Tanks”
The site investigations shall be performed over 2 nonconsecutive days to allow adequate time for investigation preparation and compilation of field notes and photographs.

We will provide a technical memorandum that summarizes the findings and recommendations. overall structural condition rating, estimated remaining useful life, and improvement recommendations.

Assumptions:
▪ Confined-space entry requirements, oxygen monitoring, and similar mobilization elements required for assessment of the reservoirs will be provided and facilitated by the City. ▪ A complete seismic analysis of the reservoirs to determine current code compliance is not required.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations Task W6: Water Distribution System Condition Assessment Dudek will use AquaTwin Asset software by Aquanuity to perform risk analysis. AquaTwin Asset is discussed in more detail in the Project Approach section. Dudek will propose a risk model (LOF, COF, ROF) and present the model to the City for confirmation/revision. Once confirmed, Dudek will build the risk model in AquaTwin Asset and run the risk model to determine the overall risk for the pipelines. We will prepare a technical memorandum discussing the method of analyses, the factors used in the scoring, the results of the analysis, and the prioritized recommended projects.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations

6.c
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 13 Task W7: Draft Capital Improvement Program
Based on the results of Tasks W3 through W6, Dudek will develop short-term (10-year) and long-term recommended CIP projects. We will prioritize and schedule CIP projects considering the results of the condition assessment and the risk-based scores. Dudek will propose a prioritization matrix to the City for concurrence and/or revision and modification. Once agreed upon, the matrix will be executed. Grouping projects will be incorporated into project planning. CIP project recommendations will be included for pipelines, reservoirs, treatment plants, pump stations, and electrical equipment.

Dudek will develop planning-level cost estimates for each CIP project recommendation, including design, construction, construction management (N), admin/legal, and other contingencies based on recent project bids, manufacturer quotes, and other data. Future projects will have escalated costs assuming inflation factors. The Master Plan report will include a discussion based on the cost estimates. As available, Dudek will obtain recent project costs from the City’s Finance Department.

Deliverables:
▪ List of prioritized projects with cost estimates in 5-year increments (Microsoft Excel) ▪ Draft and final technical memorandum in electronic format (PDF and Microsoft Excel) Task W8: Water Master Plan Report
Dudek will compile the technical memoranda developed through the progression of work, complete any missing chapters or sections (e.g., Executive Summary and Chapter 1, Introduction), and edit the complete report to produce a single, coherent document for draft submittal to the City. We will provide draft and final submittals summarizing the study and all work tasks, which will be provided to the City for review and comment. City comments on each submittal will be incorporated into the Final Master Plan report for delivery to the City.

Deliverables:
▪ Draft document and associated graphics, submitted in full color, delivered electronically (Microsoft Word and PDF) and in hard copy (four bound copies, one unbound) ▪ Final document and associated graphics and appendices, submitted in full color, delivered electronically (Microsoft Word and PDF) and in hard copy (five bound copies) Optional Task W9: Reservoir Float Investigation
If this optional task is executed, we will perform an interior float investigation of each of the steel reservoirs as part of the site investigations of Task 3. These investigations will be performed using a 2-person inflatable dinghy disinfected following AWWA guidelines prior to entry.

Floating the interior of the reservoirs provides the best opportunity to assess the condition of the roof framing where, typically, corrosion and deterioration are the most severe. Due to the fluctuating water levels and oxygen in the vapor zone, steel reservoir deterioration is typically concentrated above the water line. As part of the float investigation, KS shall assess the condition of the interior surfaces of the roof plate and shell as well as roof framing, columns, connections, hardware and coatings. Brief observation of appurtenances shall also be performed.

Assumptions:
▪ Confined-space entry requirements, oxygen monitoring, and similar mobilization elements required for assessment of the reservoirs will be provided and facilitated by the City. ▪ Float investigation of the Raw Water Ponds is not included in this optional task.

6.c
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 14 Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations will be included in Task W3.

SEWER MASTER PLAN
Task S1: Data Collection and Field Investigations
The extent of data sources associated with the project will be extensive and will benefit from an organized tracking system. This task consists of collecting and reviewing relevant data provided by the City or obtained elsewhere for this project. Data to be provided will include, but not be limited to, previously completed Master Plans, relevant planning documents, the City’s General Plan, the Urban Water Management Plan, the latest SSMP, land use maps, as-built drawings, the sewer facilities GIS, the previous sewer model, if located, water billing data and the water meter shapefile, major facilities drawings, pump curves, operational and SCADA data, O&M logs, a list of assets/equipment for each facility/site, past improvements plans, facility plans, Developer Engineering Plans, the CCTV inspection database, past flow metering data, wet well level data (if available), maintenance records, other information listed in the RFP, and any other pertinent data. Dudek will compile a data request list for information not provided during the proposal process and present it at the kickoff meeting. In addition, Dudek will prepare and maintain a list of items identified by the City or requested by Dudek indicating the item(s) requested, a person responsible for collecting the information, when it is needed, and when it was provided to Dudek.

In Task S1, Dudek will also coordinate with the City to conduct site visits to specific sewer lift stations and the WWTP. Although Dudek will perform a desktop analysis and assessment/evaluation of all 14 lift stations, Dudek has determined that field investigations are only necessary for select older and critical lift stations. Table 2 identifies which lift stations will include supplemental field investigation to be performed by Dudek’s staff.

Table 2. Summary of Lift Station Site Investigations and Requirements Facility Name
Desktop Analysis,
Evaluation, and
Assessment Required?
Supplemental Site
Investigation Required?
Type of Site
Inspection
Required
Optional
Additional Task
(S12)
Lift Station No. 3 Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Alder Canal/Villa
Avenue
Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Main Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Eastside Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Lift Station No. 1 Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Lift Station No. 2 Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
8th and Wake Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Gios Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
3rd and Ross Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Heil and Dogwood Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection

6.c
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 15 Table 2. Summary of Lift Station Site Investigations and Requirements Facility Name
Desktop Analysis,
Evaluation, and
Assessment Required?
Supplemental Site
Investigation Required?
Type of Site
Inspection
Required
Optional
Additional Task
(S12)
Buena Vista Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Orange Avenue Yes No Wet Well
Inspection
N/A
Countryside South Yes No Wet Well
Inspection
N/A
4th and Wake* Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Notes:

N/A = not applicable.
* 4th and Wake Lift Station was not documented in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan. This lift station is assumed to be included in the lift station assessment.

Table 2 also defines an optional task that Dudek can provide as additional scope at the City’s request. The associated fees for this optional additional site inspection work is reflected in the Optional Task S12 below and in the cost proposal.

To accomplish the planned lift station site investigations, Dudek plans for 3 days of primary site investigation, with an additional 1 day included for as-needed follow up investigation if the Dudek team needs to revisit a site to collect additional information (i.e., if part of a station was inaccessible on the primary investigation day or if staff is not available to complete all of the planned investigations on a primary day). Table 3 summarizes our planned lift station site investigations.

Table 3. Summary of Planned Lift Station and WWTP Site Investigation Days and Durations
Site Investigation Day Facilities Included
Combined Number of On-Site
Hours for Inspection
Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 1
Lift Station No. 3, Main Lift Station, Gios Lift
Station
5 Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 2
Alder Canal/Villa Lift Station, 3rd and Ross Lift
Station, Countryside South Lift Station
4 Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 3
Lift Station No. 1, Orange Avenue Lift Station, 4th
and Wake Lift Station

3.5 Lift Stations Follow-Up Site
Visit Day 4
To be determined following primary site visits 4 (as necessary) WWTP/WTP Primary Site
Visit Day 5
WWTP, WTP 8
Notes: WWTP = Wastewater Treatment Plant; WTP = Water Treatment Plant.

Dudek’s staff will coordinate with City operations staff to perform a field investigation of each lift station utilizing photographs, videos, and voice memos to document visual and sensory observations. Lift station field investigations will include condition assessment of mechanical, structural (all structural elements and buildings),

6.c
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 16 electrical/controls, instrumentation, and telemetry equipment as described in the project RFP, as well as site features, site access, emergency access, emergency capability, safety access, and safety concerns. Major components of the electrical systems will be reviewed, including SES, switchboards, panelboards, ATS, and standby generators. Field evaluation will include age, a condition score based on visual inspection, criticality of equipment, and safety concerns. Lighting concerns will be noted if light levels are severely poor, general light fixture condition, and safety issues. Field evaluation of the control system major components, including, PLC local control panels, pump control panels, and telemetry antennas will identify age, a score based on visual inspection, and safety concerns. Note that field investigation and condition assessment of the WWTP will be based on major WWTP assets with major assets grouped together per treatment plant process. This data will be used to identify deficiencies and develop recommend appropriate upgrades for each facility as described in Task S7.

Dudek staff will meet with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site investigations in a pre-inspection workshop to discuss known issues, improvement histories, and operator preferences. This workshop is anticipated to be 3 hours in duration and is assumed to be held virtually.

Assumptions:
▪ Data is available and provided in a timely manner.
▪ Dudek will receive City support on site for access to lift station and WWTP facilities, including access to electrical/telemetry panels, valve vaults, wet wells, dry wells, and lift station buildings and enclosures, WWTP processes, and SCADA.
▪ Operations staff will be available on site during planned lift station site investigations to draw down the level in the wet well for inspection as necessary. ▪ Dudek will conduct one pre-inspection workshop with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site visits.
▪ Per Table 3, 3 days of inspection will be required with an additional 1 follow-up day as necessary. ▪ Dudek’s team will provide our portable generator, forced air blower, O2/H2S/CO monitor, tripod with recovery winch, harnesses, etc. for confined space entry as necessary. ▪ No heavy traffic control or preparation of traffic control plans will be needed to access the lift station facilities.
▪ On-site hours for site investigations on primary site visit days listed in Table 3 assume no confined space entry is required at any of the lift stations. If it is determined that confined space entry is required, the number of on-site hours is anticipated to increase on the primary site visit days (confined space entry requires more time on site). Dudek will require the use of the follow-up site visit day if any confined space entry is conducted at any of the lift station site investigations. ▪ Shut down of any equipment is not included.
▪ Force main assessment will be based on desktop analysis only due to limitations on physical force main inspection techniques.
▪ Dewatering of existing force mains, piping, tanks, or wet structures is not included. ▪ CCTV inspection or physical scanning of force mains is not included. ▪ No on-site flow monitoring or wet well fill/draw testing at the lift stations will be included as part of the assessment.
▪ Potholing to determine location of existing buried utilities including force mains is not included. ▪ Ring out or megger testing of conductors is not included. ▪ Wiring will not be traced to confirm as-built wiring drawings accuracy.

6.c
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 17 Deliverables:
▪ Data request list
▪ Workshop agenda and minutes
▪ Field investigation field notes, observations, and assessment documentation will be included in the improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum per Task S7.

Task S2: GIS Gap Analyses and Needs Assessment
Per the City’s SSMP, the City’s GIS is missing critical information. Dudek will obtain and review the City’s sewer system GIS to evaluate the data gaps that would need to be filled into order to develop a sewer model that has sufficient accuracy of pipeline inverts, pipe slopes and diameters to produce accurate results. For the purposes of this proposal, a field survey of 100 manholes was assumed to facilitate development of the hydraulic model in Task S5. A technical memorandum will be developed that details the data gaps and a verification plan using field surveying to fill in the gaps. Depending on the level of data gaps, this project may be Phase 1 of a multiphase project to survey the City’s sewer collection system and update the City’s GIS and hydraulic model over time to develop an accurate model of the system.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the data gaps and proposed survey plan to fill in the gaps Task S3: Temporary Flow Monitoring
The City’s 2008 Sewer Master Plan included flow metering at nine locations within the system. Dudek proposes to also monitor at nine locations, including several of the same locations metered in 2008 to evaluate the change in sewer flow in the system over time, to account for both the impacts of conservation as well as growth in the community.

Dudek’s goal when developing the flow monitoring plan is two-fold:

1. Calibration of the Hydraulic Model – Placing several flow meters at the exact locations used in the past
flow metering studies, if available, and a comparison
of average flows will be used to calibrate the sewer
model and assess the system-wide change in flows
over the years.

2. Defect Flow Sensitivity – Defect flow consists of anything other than intended sanitary sewer flow, such as groundwater infiltration, inflow from the surface, or illegal connections from gutters. As a first step toward finding and fixing defect flows within the collection system, using flow meters in conjunction with a significant rain event will provide direction on where problems exist.

Dudek will develop a flow monitoring work plan with the City, prioritizing locations that:
▪ Were monitored as part of the 2008 Sewer Maser Plan
▪ Are suspected by operations staff to have high rainfall depended inflow and infiltration (RDII) ▪ Have high average flow rates for comparison of overall system growth over the past years ▪ Are fed by areas of consistent land use type (e.g., single-family residential) for use in updating unit flow factors ADS Environmental Services will provide flow
monitoring and will validate the hydraulic
model and any defect flow sensitivity.

6.c
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 18 Wet weather flow monitoring is anticipated to last 6 weeks with the primary goal of capturing a wet weather event.

Dudek will prepare a flow metering work plan for the monitoring program. A flow metering summary report will be prepared by ADS Environmental Services (ADS) that evaluates typical dry and wet weather diurnal patterns for weekdays and weekends. In addition, RDII will be included for estimating peak wet weather factors.

Assumptions:
▪ The fee estimate includes nine flow meters and one rain gauge for 6 weeks in winter 2024/2025.

Deliverables:
▪ Flow monitoring work plan by Dudek and ADS flow monitoring summary report with RDII analysis if rainfall event is captured
▪ Meeting agenda and minutes
Task S4: Establish Sewer Flow Criteria
Dudek will use the flow metering data, land use data, water billing data to evaluate sewer generation factors for the City. Diurnal flow patterns and sewer peaking factors will be developed using the flow metering data from Task S3 as well as WWTP influent flow data and historical rainfall data. These sewer generation factors along with the General Plan, known planned development data from the Planning Department, and State Housing Element requirements will be used to estimate buildout flow conditions for the City, to be utilized in the capacity analysis in Task S6.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed technical memorandum summarizing the proposed sewer generation factors by land use type, peaking factors, and planning estimate for future sewer flows Task S5: Hydraulic Sewer Model Development and Calibration Using the survey plan developed in Task S2, Dudek will coordinate with NV5 for surveying of 100 manholes. Invert, ground surface, pipeline diameter, and flow routing data will be used to update the City’s sewer collection system GIS, which will be in turn used to build the City’s hydraulic model.

Unless an agency has dedicated modeling staff in-house that intend to perform hydraulic modeling regularly, Dudek does not recommend an agency purchase hydraulic modeling software. Modeling software purchases tend to be a financial loss for such agencies. A more cost-efficient strategy is to utilize a consultant’s software. Dudek proposes using Aquanuity’s AquaTwin Sewer hydraulic modeling software to develop the City’s new sewer model.

AquaTwin Sewer is a GIS Pro-based software package that utilizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) 5 engine to evaluate open channel flow hydraulics. Dudek will use the City’s existing sewer GIS, WWTP flows, lift station on/off settings and water billing data from Task S1, manhole surveying data from Task S2, flow metering data from Task S3, and diurnal patterns and peaking factors from Task S4 to develop and calibrate the sewer model. Sewer loading will be allocated in the system using georeferenced water billing data. The existing dry weather flow condition in the model will be calibrated to within 10% of measured data. The dry weather flow model will be peaked to develop an Existing Peak Wet Weather Flow model for capacity analysis.

Assumptions:
▪ Water billing data is available with georeferenced water meter shapefile. ▪ The survey plan will include 100 manholes for surveying performed by NV5.

6.c
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 19 Deliverables:
▪ Updated GIS with survey inverts included
▪ Technical memorandum documenting the model development and calibration process and results Task S6: Hydraulic Sewer Model Analysis
The collection system capacity will be evaluated under existing and projected buildout conditions utilizing the calibrated model from Task S5 and the planning criteria from Task S4. Extended-period simulations will be used to evaluate the full range of flow conditions. Resulting peak wet weather flows, depth over diameter (d/D) values, and velocities will be compared to City criteria. Modeling results will be used to identify pipelines not meeting planning criteria, those with capacity constraints under dry and wet weather conditions, and areas of potentially high RDII. Results will be presented tabularly and graphically. Subsequent model runs will be used to recommend system improvements in the form of pipeline upsizing. The model will include user-defined fields documenting deficiencies and recommended upsizing projects for existing and projected buildout conditions.

Assumptions:
▪ Existing and buildout wet weather flow analyses will be performed. If insufficient data are available to estimate a wet weather peaking factor for the system, the capacity analysis will be performed on peak dry weather flows.

Deliverables:
▪ Sewer modeling files
▪ GIS files extracted from the sewer model
▪ Detailed technical memorandum for City review outlining the results of the modeling and a list of recommended pipeline upsizing projects to address existing and buildout capacity deficiencies Task S7: Sewer Lift Station, Force Main, and WWTP Condition Assessment and Resiliency Analyses
Dudek will review the field investigation information, photos, videos, and observations from the lift stations site investigations. Dudek’s lift stations and force mains desktop analysis will include a hydraulic analysis, a capacity evaluation, an emergency capability evaluation, a reliability evaluation, and an evaluation for feasibility of lift station elimination for all lift stations. Dudek’s lift station desktop analysis will also analyze historical issues, current operational concerns, City preferences, operational nuances, and emergency capabilities at each lift station. Dudek will use this information, the data/information collected and reviewed in Task S1 for the desktop analysis, and the information provided from operations staff during the pre-inspection workshop to perform a condition assessment, evaluation, and resiliency analysis and analyze adequacy in case of emergency or failure for all 14 lift stations. This will be a comprehensive condition assessment that will document deficiencies of site features, as well as all mechanical, structural, electrical/controls, and telemetry equipment. Deficiencies for emergency capability, storage, maintenance/emergency access, safety, and odor control will also be documented for each lift station.

This condition assessment and evaluation of the lift stations will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets at each of the lift stations. Based on the condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and develop recommended improvements (and in some cases recommended alternative improvements) to extend the useful life of the lift stations, provide resiliency upgrades, and recommend upgrades to ensure each lift station meets capacity requirements under current and buildout scenarios.

The WWTP condition assessment will be a more generalized structural, life span, and process assessment per process for major assets/facilities. Dudek will review the field investigation information, photos, videos, and

6.c
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 20 observations from the WWTP site investigation. Dudek’s lift station desktop analysis will also analyze historical issues, current operational concerns, City preferences, and operational nuances at the WWTP. Based on this condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and areas of concern to maintain operations. Dudek will also identify growth or modifications required to address/filter for new potential state mandates and regulations, etc. This condition assessment and evaluation of the WWTP will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets grouped by WWTP process. Dudek will develop recommended improvements (and in some cases recommended alternative improvements) to improve the service life of major assets at the WWTP as well as improvements required to meet future capacity requirements and current state mandates and regulations.

The developed asset scoring will be used as a tool to help prioritize the recommended improvements for all lift stations and the WWTP for incorporation into the overall CIP. Budgetary cost estimates for recommended upgrades, replacements, and expansions will be provided. Each recommendation will be listed in priority order.

Task S7 includes QC review by NV5.

Assumptions:
▪ Force main assessment will be based on desktop analysis only due to limitations on physical force main inspection techniques.
▪ Force main dewatering and lift station shut down is not included. ▪ Field investigation notes will be summarized and included as an appendix to the technical memorandum.
▪ Asset scoring will be performed for major facility assets; smaller items such as pipe supports will be generally grouped together and provided a single assessment score. No asset database will be prepared for asset scoring. Asset scoring breakdowns per lift station will be organized into a spreadsheet table and attached as an appendix to the technical memorandum. ▪ Hydraulic evaluation/analysis of lift stations will be based on historical flow data (if available) for each lift station in combination with any information provided by operations staff. ▪ No on-site flow monitoring or wet well fill/draw testing at the lift stations will be included as part of the assessment.
▪ A list of major asset with installation dates will be provided by City staff in a consolidated electronic form. Condition assessment of WWTP major assets will be determined by visual inspection and operational/repair/rehabilitation history provided by City staff.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum summarizing the findings of the lift station and WWTP field investigations, documentation of deficiencies, and our recommended improvements and associated cost estimates Task S8: Update of Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Report Dudek always aims to develop a Master Plan report that is highly useful to multiple departments in an agency, including engineering, planning, operations, and finance. To succeed, the resulting deliverables must be clear and easy to read and enable quick retrieval of information. In addition to being functional, the reports must do the following:
▪ Provide a thorough system inventory of the collection system pipelines and facilities ▪ Contain clear explanations of design and evaluation criteria based on industry standards and the region’s unique characteristics

6.c
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 21 ▪ Provide sufficient detail on the master planning process to give the reader an understanding and ability to replicate and/or update the process when the time arises ▪ Identify areas within the service areas with a substandard condition, performance, or capacity and present those tabularly and graphically
▪ Identify projects that improve performance and/or increase efficiency to improve system reliability and meet regulatory requirements
▪ Succinctly summarize the findings, results, and prioritized recommendations of the Master Plan (from Task S9) for easy implementation
Dudek will compile the technical memorandums developed through the progression of work, complete any missing chapters or sections (e.g., Executive Summary and Chapters 1, Introduction), and edit the complete report to produce a single coherent document for draft submittal to the City. Dudek will submit the draft report to the City for review and comment. Dudek will prepare the Final Sewer Master Plan Update documents addressing the City’s comments on the Draft Sewer Master Plan submittal.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one virtual draft Master Plan review meeting to discuss City comments. ▪ Dudek will address a single, consolidated set of comments for the Draft Sewer Master Plan Update report submittal.

Deliverables:
▪ Draft and Final Sewer Master Plan Update reports in PDF and Microsoft Word formats ▪ Three hard copies of the Final Master Plan Report
▪ Review meeting agenda and minutes
▪ Sewer hydraulic modeling files, Existing and Buildout Master Plan of Sewer exhibits (three hard copies of each)
Task S9: Capital Improvement Program
Using the results of Tasks S6 (Capacity Analysis), S7 (Lift Station and Force Main Condition Assessment) and S10 (Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment), Dudek will develop short-term (10-year) and long-term recommended CIP projects to address the deficiencies identified. The development of the CIP will be based on the available condition assessment information and the useful life and value of the existing sewer collection system assets. We will establish asset values and recommend maintenance and aging infrastructure’s year-to-year replacement/rehabilitation cost. Findings and recommendations from the 2008 Sewer Master Plan will be evaluated and incorporated into the recommendations for this project, if still viable.

Dudek will prioritize and schedule CIP projects considering the results of Tasks S6, S7, and S10, the severity of the deficiency, the criticality of the facility to system operations, potential I&I reduction from rehab, cost of facility failure, and other factors. Dudek will propose a prioritization matrix to the City for concurrence and/or revision and modification. Once agreed upon, the matrix will be executed. Grouping projects will be incorporated into project planning. CIP project recommendations will be included for gravity sewer pipelines, siphons, manholes, lift stations, and force mains.

Dudek will develop planning-level cost estimates for each CIP project recommendation, including design, construction, CM, admin/legal, and other contingencies based on recent project bids, manufacturer quotes, and other data. Future projects will have escalated costs assuming inflation factors. The Master Plan report will

6.c
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 22 include a discussion based on the cost estimates. As available, Dudek will obtain recent project costs from the City’s Finance Department. Task S9 includes QC review by NV5.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one virtual CIP review meeting to discuss the results. ▪ Dudek will generate unit costs and factors for estimating construction and project-level soft costs.

Deliverables:
▪ Tabular cost estimates for each CIP project recommended will be placed in the draft and final sewer master plan reports.
▪ Review meeting agenda and minutes
Task S10: Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment
Consideration of condition, assessment of needs, and rehabilitation of facilities are critical to ensure continued reliability and economic feasibility of maintaining the City’s collection system assets as well as to comply with the Reissued WDR. Given Dudek’s support of the City’s most recent SSMP Audit and Update, we understand that there is not a significant amount of CCTV inspection data at this time, though we know the City is currently underway in expanding these efforts. Dudek proposes this task toward the later portion of the project to give the City time to collect these data. This task will support the continuation of the City’s efforts by incorporating identified deficiencies into the proposed CIP and identifying new weaknesses in larger diameter pipelines (12 inches and larger), particularly those pipelines with the highest identified risk and those in the vicinity of capacity improvements identified as part of Task S6.

Dudek will utilize the inspection reports primarily to evaluate pipeline conditions. We anticipate videos will be reviewed in the case of potential pipeline replacement project recommendations. Dudek will review the existing CCTV inspection reports for each pipeline reach; document defects, laterals, sags, debris, roots, grease, offset joints, cracks, or other noted problems; and identify infrastructure at risk of failure due to condition.

The steps associated with the condition assessment are shown graphically in Figure 5 below.

Figure 5. Condition Assessment Flow

6.c
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 23 The specific rehabilitation method selected will be
determined on a reach-by-reach basis and coordinated with the capacity improvement recommendations to minimize
expensive and intrusive open cut construction. Dudek is highly experienced in evaluating defects and looks to
balance the benefits of rehabilitation versus cost and
useful life of the host pipeline. Full-length pipeline
rehabilitation may not necessarily be recommended in all cases. For example, where the pipeline’s structural integrity has been compromised due to collapse or other failure,
point repairs of single pipe segments or connections at manholes may be the only rehabilitation means necessary.

Depending on the nature, quantity, and severity of defects observed during the condition assessment review,
methods of trenchless rehabilitation or repair to be
considered include the following: specialty and heavy
cleaning; in-situ point repair such as Weko Seal, Link-Pipe mechanical seal, or LMK Performance short liner; open
trench point repairs such as short- or long-segment pipe replacement; in-situ lining with cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liner cured with hot water or steam; complete open cut removal and replacement; and total replacement using a trenchless method such as pipe bursting.

Assumptions:
▪ The fee estimate includes 100 pipeline segments for this task. ▪ A manhole condition assessment will not be performed. ▪ CCTV inspection reports are readily available.

Deliverables:
▪ Tabular representation of recommendations and graphical map of project locations included in master plan report.

Task S11: Sewer Master Plan Project Management
Effective project management is key to the successful completion of any project. Dudek has a proven record of delivering projects on time and within budget. Please refer to the “Project Management Approach” section for our detailed project management and quality control approach.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one in-person project kickoff meeting at City offices (both Water & Sewer). ▪ There will be 32 virtual bimonthly project status meetings for the Sewer Master Plan. ▪ There will be four virtual City staff meetings.
▪ There will be two in-person City Council presentations for the Sewer Master Plan document and Sewer Rate Study.

Deliverables:
▪ Monthly progress reports
▪ Updated schedules
▪ Kickoff and status meeting agenda and minutes
Dudek completed a sewer rehabilitation program
for the City of South Pasadena. CIPP was used to
repair the sewer pipelines, reducing the impact to
local residents and businesses.

6.c
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 24 Optional Task S12: Supplemental Wet Well Evaluations
Per Task S1 and Table 2 above, this optional task includes site investigation time for five (5) additional wet well inspections.

Deliverables:
▪ Field investigation field notes, observations, and assessment documentation will be included in the improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum per Task S7.

Optional Task S13: WWTP and Select Lift Station Structural Review by Kelsey Based on observations during the site visit by Dudek, it is recommended the City consider a more thorough structural evaluation of the structures within the WWTP and select lift stations by a structural engineer. This would include approximately 18 structures at the WWTP and nine (9) of the lift station wet well videos. Findings would be summarized in a single technical memorandum and included in the Sewer CIP.

WATER AND SEWER COST OF SERVICE RATE AND CAPACITY FEE STUDY The scope of work provided below is based on the City’s RFP and our experience completing successful water and sewer cost-of-service and capacity fee studies for utilities in California and throughout the United States.

Task 1: Project Initiation and Management
Task 1.1 Initial Data Request and Data Review
Immediately upon receiving the notice to proceed, Raftelis will submit a comprehensive data request to the City seeking information such as that listed below. To the extent possible, we will review the information provided prior to the project kickoff meeting.
▪ Customer billing data (Microsoft Excel)
▪ Current and proposed revenue and expenditure budgets (Microsoft Excel) ▪ CIP projections based on the Water and Sewer Master Plans and the City’s long-term CIP plans (Microsoft Excel)
▪ WTP and WWTP production data (Microsoft Excel)
▪ 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (PDF)
Task 1.2 Project Management
Raftelis will provide timely identification of project issues/challenges as they arise during the project and ongoing model quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) by the project manager and technical advisor/quality reviewer.

Assumes the kick-off meeting will be held in person.

Deliverables:
▪ Pre-kickoff meeting data request

6.c
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 25 Task 2: Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics and Demand Forecasting (Water and Sewer)
Task 2.1 Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics The analysis of customer water consumption characteristics is critical for the development of the demand forecast that underlies the water and sewer financial plans, the allocation of costs to customer classes, and the development of rate structure alternatives. After obtaining the City’s actual historical customer billing data for the period FY 2021–FY 2023, Raftelis will seek to analyze the following types of information for each major customer type/land use:
▪ Account growth by meter size
▪ Monthly, seasonal, and annual consumption
▪ Average day, maximum day, and maximum hour consumption ▪ Winter average consumption as a proxy for indoor consumption ▪ Estimates of indoor and outdoor consumption on a per account and gallons per capita day (gpcd) basis ▪ The correlation between water consumption and single-family residential gross lot sizes and irrigable areas ▪ Historical consumption declines during drought stage emergencies Task 2.2 Demand Forecasting
Raftelis will prepare comprehensive demand forecasts for the water and sewer utilities for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034. It will be developed using Microsoft Excel to allow for scenario modeling.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed understanding of customer water consumption characteristics ▪ Comprehensive forecast of billed water and sewer demand for the 10-year period FY 2025– FY 2034
▪ Comprehensive estimate of billed sewer discharges for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034 Task 3: Financial Planning and Revenue Requirement Forecasting (Water and Sewer) Task 3.1 Raftelis Approach to the Financial Planning Process Utility financial planning is an iterative process in which the “optimal” capital financing strategy must be identified.

This requires achieving the correct balance between CIP financing provided by rate revenues, capacity fees, grants, and external debt financing. A comprehensive and correctly developed financial plan must be based on a realistic projection of customer water and sewer demand under normalized climate conditions and reasonable assumptions of customer account growth. The Microsoft Excel financial planning models developed by Raftelis will allow City staff to vary inputs for items such as customer account growth, average billed water consumption per account, average contributed sewer flow per account, CIP expenditures and financing strategies, operating expenses, inflation rates, etc.

Figure 6 illustrates the financial planning process that will be used by Raftelis for each of the City’s utility services.

6.c
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 26 Figure 6. Financial Planning Process
Task 3.2 Review and Evaluation of City Financial Policies Raftelis will review and, as appropriate, make recommendations regarding the City’s financial policies. These policies will include items such as the minimum and maximum cash reserve targets, the use of external debt financing for repair and replacement versus growth-related CIP projects, and the appropriate target debt service coverage ratios for senior and subordinated debt.

Task 3.3 Comprehensive Cash Flow Projection and Revenue Requirement Forecasting The City seeks the development of a financial plan for the 5-year period CY 2025–2029. The financial plan developed by Raftelis will be for the 10-year period CY 2025–2034. This will allow the City to assess its financial position in Years 6–10 of the projection period considering potential long-term changes in customer water consumption characteristics, water supply costs, regulatory requirements, etc. The comprehensive cash flow projection will include the following:
▪ Revenue Under Existing Rates: A projection of rate revenues generated under existing rates based on the updated demand forecast completed in Task 2; the projection will include billed water consumption across all tiers, customer types, and meter sizes
▪ O&M Expenses: O&M expenses including inflation adjustments and potential changes in the profile of outyear O&M caused by system technological changes ▪ Potential Pass-Through Costs: The identification of ongoing costs that are not under City control and thus potentially appropriate for recovery via a “pass-through” adjustment (e.g., water supply costs and electric power)
▪ Debt Service: Existing and projected debt service expenditures used for CIP funding, pension obligation funding, etc.
▪ CIP Expenditures: All CIP expenditures, regardless of funding source, developed as part of the water and sewer master planning process and the City’s long-term CIP plan

6.c
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 27 Task 3.4 Scenario Analysis – Financial Plan Optimization Financial Planning Criteria Specified in the City’s RFP: The City’s RFP specifies that the water and sewer financial plans must meet the following minimum criteria while ensuring full funding for regulatory compliance costs, repair and replacement of existing infrastructure, and timely financing for all identified capital improvement needs:
▪ Debt coverage revenue requirements per City’s bond covenants (net operating revenue including capacity fees must be 1.25 times debt service, and without capacity fees must be 1.00 times debt service) ▪ Maintain a minimum reserve of 2 months operating cash ▪ Maintain the water utility’s current “A” credit rating ▪ Maintain rate stabilization reserves to deal with potential temporary revenue reductions from reduced water consumption due to drought, conservation, or the economy Scenario Analysis: This involves the analysis of required rate increase under different utility sales for each service, CIP expenditure, and debt service alternatives. It includes the modeling of projected cash reserve and debt service coverage for each year of the planning horizon. As instructed in the City’s RFP, a minimum of three financial planning scenarios will be developed.
▪ “Do Nothing” Scenario: Comprehensive financial plans that assume no rate increases over the 10-year financial planning horizon
▪ “More of the Same” Scenario: Comprehensive financial plans that assume annual rate revenue increases if the City was to replicate its previously approved historical rate increases over the 10-year planning horizon
▪ Optimal Capital Financing Scenario: Development of an “optimal” capital financing strategy that balances the projected mix of rate revenues, capacity fees, grants, and external debt funding to fund capital improvements
▪ Drought Risk Assessment: Assessment of the risk of water sales revenue shortfalls due to short- and longterm drought events Task 3.5 Revenue Requirement Projection
Based on the optimal financial planning scenario developed in Task 3.4, Raftelis will project total system revenue requirement from rates for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034 for water and sewer utility services.

Deliverables:
▪ Development of the optimal financial planning scenario in consultation with City staff ▪ Water and sewer financial plans and revenue requirement projections for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034
▪ Potential recommendations for changes in financial policies Task 4: Cost-of-Service Analysis (Water and Sewer)
Task 4.1 Raftelis Approach to the Cost-of-Service Process The procedures used by Raftelis in water and sewer cost-of-service studies are based on industry standard methods presented in the AWWA publication, Manual of Water Supply Practices M1, Principles of Water, Rates, Fees, and Charges (AWWA Manual M1) and the Water Environment Federation publication, Manual of Practice No. 27, Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems (WEF Manual 27). The use of industry-standard procedures

6.c
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 28 corresponds to the cost-of-service mandate contained in California Proposition 218. Figure 7 illustrates the multistep cost allocation process used by Raftelis for a water cost-of-service study.

Figure 7. Water Cost-of-Service Process
Figure 8 illustrates the multistep cost allocation process used by Raftelis for a sewer cost-of-service study.

Figure 8. Sewer Cost-of-Service Process
Task 4.2 Water and Sewer Cost-of-Service Analysis
▪ Test-Year Revenue Requirement: Determination of the test year revenue requirement based on the Task 3 financial planning process.
▪ Cost Functionalization: Determination of the net book value or replacement cost of existing utility infrastructure to the correct functional categories to allocate annual capital costs. Assignment of test-year capital costs (PAYGO financing and projected debt service), O&M expenses, and non-rate revenue offsets to the correct functional categories.
▪ Allocation to Cost Causation Components: Allocation of test-year capital costs, O&M expenses, and nonrate revenue offsets to the correct cost causation components. For a water utility, common cost causation components are water supply, base demand, maximum day demand, maximum hour demand, billing, and Step 1
Revenue Requirement
from Financial Plan
Operation and
Maintenance Expense
Debt Service
Capital Costs
Transfers
Step 2
Functionalize
Costs
Source of Supply
Treatment
Storage & Distribution
Meters and Billing
Step 3
Allocate Functions
to Demand
Characteristics
Base
Max Day
Max Hour
Metering
Fire Protection
Step 4
Distribute Costs to
Customer Classes
Residential
Multifamily
Commercial / Industrial
Irrigation
Step 1
Revenue Requirement
from Financial Plan
Operation and
Maintenance Expense
Debt Service
Capital Costs
Transfers
Step 2
Functionalize
Costs
Collection/Conveyance
Lift Stations/Pumping
Treatment
Biosolid Handling
Step 3
Allocate Functions
to Demand
Characteristics
Flow
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand
Suspended Solids
Customer Service
Step 4
Distribute Costs to
Customer Classes
Residential
Multifamily
Commercial
Industrial

6.c
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 29 customer service. Common sewer utility cost causation components include flow, biochemical oxygen demand, and suspended solids.
▪ Customer Class Units of Service: Determination of the customer class units of service. For a water utility, units of service often include customer class average day demands, peak demands, number of bills, and number of 3/4-inch or 1-inch meter equivalents. For a sewer utility, units of service include volume of flows and pounds of biochemical oxygen demand and pounds of suspended solids. ▪ Customer Class Cost-of-Service: Distribution of the allocated test-year capital costs, O&M expenses, and non-rate revenue offsets to customer classes based on each of their proportionate share of demands, bills, and equivalent meters.

Deliverables:
▪ Water service customer class cost-of-service
▪ Sewer service customer class cost-of-service
Task 5: Rate Structure Design and Proposed Rates
Task 5.1 Current Water and Sewer Rates
As shown in Table 4, the City currently charges a $/thousand gallon volumetric rate for billed water consumption and fixed monthly charges based on meter size.

Table 4. Current Rates
Water Usage Charge (per 1,000 gallons)
All Consumption $3.75
Monthly Service Charge ($/meter size)
5/8 inch and 3/4 inch $3.56
1 inch $4.33
2 inch $6.03
3 inch $19.20
4 inch $22.23
6 inch $32.71
8 inch $44.68
A monthly flat sewer rate is paid by single-family residential and duplex customers (1 and 2 below), and a volumetric rate of $/thousand gallons is paid by all other customers (3 through 22 below). The current sewer rates are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Current Sewer Rates
# Land Use Rate Rate Structure / Billing
Residential
1 Single Family $58.79 Monthly Flat Rate
2 Duplex $87.97 Monthly Flat Rate

6.c
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 30 Table 5. Current Sewer Rates
# Land Use Rate Rate Structure / Billing
3 Multiple Family, Condominium $4.05 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 4 Mobile Home Park $4.05 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons Commercial and Other
5 Hotel, Motel, without dining facilities $5.32 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 6 Laundromat $4.23 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
7 Commercial Laundry, Dry Cleaner $6.99 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 8 Market w/ Garbage Disposal, Butcher Shop, Mortuary $12.82 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 9 Professional Office $3.91 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 10 Repair Shop, Service Station $5.51 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 11 Bar, Tavern $5.13 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
12 Car Wash $3.65 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
13 Soft Water Service $2.94 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 14 Hospital, Convalescent Facility, Medical Office $4.81 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 15 Hotel, Motel with Dining Facilities $9.62 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 16 Restaurant, Bakery $12.12 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 17 School, College, Church $4.04 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 18 Retail Store $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
19 Beauty Parlor $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
20 Ice-making $1.50 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
21 Movie Theatre $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
22 Packing Shed $1.50 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
Task 5.2 Development of Proposed Rates and Rate Structure Alternatives After the completion of the cost-of-service analyses described in Task 4, Raftelis will work with the City staff to develop potential alternative water and sewer rate structures. Our proposed consulting fee assumes we will evaluate a maximum of two alternative water rate structures and two alternative sewer rate structures. In addition, we will evaluate the potential for the implementation of a water budget-based rate structure as discussed in the Evaluation of Water Budget Rate–Based Rate Structure section below.

6.c
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 31 The alternative rate structures recommended by Raftelis will produce adequate revenues to maintain water and sewer utility financial sufficiency over short-, medium-, and long-term planning horizons. When considering potential alternative rate designs, Raftelis will perform the following analysis:
▪ City Rate Structure Objectives: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the current water and sewer rate structures in achieving the City’s pricing and policy objectives ▪ Fixed vs. Volumetric Revenue Recovery: Impact of potential alternative rates on water and sewer fund revenue stability/volatility
▪ Customer Class Definitions: Appropriateness of the current water and sewer rate structures considering the customer class definitions identified in the water and sewer cost-of-service processes (Task 4) ▪ Proposition 218 Compliance: Ability of potential alternative rate structures to fully comply with Proposition 218 and other applicable California regulatory requirements ▪ Customer Bill Impacts: Impact of potential alternative rate structures on customer bills (monthly and annual) across a broad range of demand (i.e., very low consumption to very high consumption customers) ▪ Ease of Customer Understanding: Ability of customers to easily understand potential alternative rate structures and the ability of the City to administer such alternatives Task 5.3 Evaluation of Water Budget Rate–Based Rate Structure Our proposed consulting fee includes the evaluation of the potential implementation of a water budget–based rate structure for the City’s water customers. Our analysis will include:
▪ Billing System Capabilities: An assessment of the City’s customer information system to successfully bill customers under a water budget rate structure.
▪ GIS Data Availability: A review of the GIS data the City maintains regarding residential and landscape irrigation customer gross lot size and irrigable area.
▪ Definition of Essential Use, Efficient Use, and Inefficient Use: The allocation of customer water usage into specific categories. For example, essential indoor usage may be declined by the 47-gallon per capita per day requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 1157. Efficient use pay be defined as a level of outdoor irrigation consumption based on the reference evapotranspiration rate and the evapotranspiration rate adjustment factor
▪ Determination of Water Budget Tier Thresholds: This is the level of water consumption associated with each water budget tier. An example appears below in Table 6.

Table 6. Example Tier Structure
Tier 1 0 – 100% Essential Allocation
Tier 2 100% Efficient Allocation
Tier 3 101 – 130% Above Efficient Allocation
Tier 4 131 – 160% Above Efficient Allocation
Tier 5 161% and Above Efficient Allocation
▪ Estimate of Water Budget Rates and Customer Bill Impacts: Based on our work in Task 2 (Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics) and Task 4 (Cost-of-Service Analysis), we will develop preliminary proposed rates for each water budget tier and estimated single-family residential bill impacts.

6.c
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 32 Task 5.4 Overarching Awareness of Proposition 218 Requirements From the initial kickoff meeting through the development of proposed rates, we stay focused on the need to comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 218. Throughout the financial planning, cost allocation, and rate design process we will work with City staff and legal counsel to help achieve this objective. While we strive to comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 218, it is important to note the Raftelis shall have no obligation to indemnify the City or any Indemnitee against liability for claims by a third party for failure to comply with its obligations under Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).

Task 5.5 Awareness of California Regulatory Requirement and Litigation Raftelis is not a law firm, but we do closely follow litigation that may have bearing on the water rate structures implemented by our clients. For example, the California Court of Appeals is currently considering two cases related to the validity of tiered rate structures. Similarly, AB 1157, which become law in 2022, requires that indoor water use be a maximum of 47 gpcd in 2025 declining to 42 gpcd in 2030. Another example is the recently enacted AB 755, which requires utilities to quantify the cost of serving the top 10% of water users. Our awareness of litigation and changing regulatory requirements enhances our ability to serve the City.

Task 5.6 City Water Code Chapter 3.8 Water Usage Demand Analysis(AB 755) Raftelis will prepare a water usage demand analysis as required by Chapter 3.8 of the Water Code, commencing with Water Code Section 390, to identify the cost of water service to the highest water users (as defined) and the average annual volume of water delivered to such high users. This information shall be included in and posted in the cost of service analysis.

Task 5.7 Comprehensive Bill Impact Calculations
Raftelis will calculate comprehensive bill impacts for the City’s existing and proposed water and sewer rates.

Bill impacts will be calculated for multiple customer land use types and across a wide distribution of monthly and annual consumption volumes. This will ensure that City staff is fully informed about potential customer bill ramifications.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposed 5-year water and sewer rates for the period FY 2025–FY 2029 ▪ Consideration of alternative rate structures for water and sewer service ▪ Evaluation of a water budget-based rate structure
▪ Comprehensive customer bill impacts
Task 6: Capacity Fee Study (Water and Sewer)
Task 6.1 Current Capacity Fees
The City’s current capacity fees are assessed on an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) basis. The City’s current capacity fees are shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Current Capacity Fees
Water $6,149 per ERU
Sewer $7,174 per ERU

6.c
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 33 Task 6.2 Project Initiation and Regulatory Compliance
To initiate the water and sewer capacity fee studies, we will consult with City staff to understand how capacity fees are currently assessed and what costs they recover. Based on the understanding gained from this discussion we will develop a proposed approach and provide the City with a comprehensive data request. We will then review all relevant documentation, including the water and sewer engineering Master Plans, the City’s Urban Water Management Plan, and the City’s rules/regulations for capacity fees.

The capacity fees we develop will be based on industry practices and in full compliance with California legal standards as contained in California Government Code Sections 66000–66025. This will include compliance with the requirements of California’s Mitigation Fee Act and general legal principles related to impact fees. Under California law, “fees,” as opposed to “taxes,” can be adopted without the two-thirds vote of the public as required by Proposition 13. The State of California Mitigation Fee Act, also known as AB 1600 and codified in Sections 66000–66025 of the California Government Code, establishes a requirement for “nexus” in the establishment of a development fee. The nexus requirements are that (1) a development fee is directly related to the impacts of the development and (2) the fee is roughly proportional to the impacts of the project.

Task 6.3 Update of Equivalent Residential Unit Relationships Raftelis will update the ERU factors for each land use type as contained in City Resolution 07-100. This analysis will require an analysis of customer water consumption characteristics by highly defined land use types as contained in Resolution 07-100.

Task 6.4 Selection of an Infrastructure Valuation Methodology Raftelis will work with City staff to choose the appropriate methodology to be used in the City’s water capacity fee study. There are three industry-standard methods for the calculation of capacity fees:
▪ Buy-In Approach: Appropriate for utilities with existing available infrastructure capacity to meet projected demand
▪ Incremental Approach: Appropriate for utilities with existing infrastructure capacity constraints that must construct significant new infrastructure to meet projected demand ▪ Hybrid Approach: Appropriate for utilities with some available existing infrastructure capacity but also a need to construct new infrastructure to meet projected demand Task 6.5 Valuation of Water and Sewer Infrastructure
Informed by the chosen calculation methodology, Raftelis will develop a water capacity fee model that reflects either, or both, of the following:
▪ Existing Infrastructure: An infrastructure valuation for each major existing functional component of the water and sewer systems. For existing assets, the valuation will be based on “replacement cost less deprecation” (RCLD). The replacement cost will be developed using the construction cost inflation factors published in the Engineering News-Record (ENR CCI). The value of growth-related infrastructure will be based on present value as expressed in current year 2024 or 2025 dollars. If the City’s fixed asset subsidiary ledger does not contain an adequate level of information to develop a replacement cost estimate using these construction cost inflation factors (for example, inadequate information on the function performed by major assets), then an alternative valuation method will be selected in consultation with City staff.
▪ Planned Infrastructure Expansion: The present value of projected water and sewer growth-related infrastructure expenditures contained in the City’s current capital improvement plans.

6.c
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 34 As part of the infrastructure valuation process, outstanding debt principal used to finance existing system water infrastructure will be subtracted from the RCLD valuation. Accumulated cash reserves will be added to the RCLD valuation.

Task 6.6 Determination of Customer ERU Demand and Projected ERU Growth For the Buy-In Method, Raftelis will estimate the number of ERU currently served by the City’s existing water and sewer system. For the Incremental Method, Raftelis will project the number of future ERUs that can be served by planned growth-related infrastructure additions. This estimate will be based on residential customer household density and gpcd water usage. As part of this process, Raftelis will analyze billing data for existing customers, consult your current Urban Water Management Plan, and the most recent engineering Master Plan.

Task 6.7 Calculation of the Water and Sewer Capacity Fees Based on the work completed for the calculation methodology and customer demand analysis, Raftelis will calculate the following:
▪ The baseline water capacity fee expressed on a $/ERU basis (e.g., for a 3/4-inch equivalent connection) ▪ A baseline sewer capacity on a $/ERU basis
Task 6.8 10-Year Capacity Fee Fund Financial Plans
Based on the work completed in Tasks 6.1–6.7, Raftelis will prepare a 10-year projection of water and sewer Capacity Fee Fund revenues (sources of funds), expenditures (uses of funds), and beginning and ending cash balances. The purpose of this projection will be to determine the adequacy of projected capacity fee revenues as compared to projected growth-related capital improvement expenditures. It is important to note two things about this type of projection:
▪ Projections of this type are highly speculative because they assume an annual level of new connections (i.e., new development) that may not materialize as planned. ▪ Even if the new connections materialize as projected, the level of revenue generated by connection fees may be significantly less than actual level of planned growth-related capital expenditures.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposed water and sewer capacity fees
Task 7: Cost-of-Service Rate Study Reports
Our approach to the report development process is to work collaboratively with the City’s legal counsel to ensure compliance with state law. Our approach includes:
▪ Creation of a Detailed Administrative Record: Raftelis prepares comprehensive rate study reports that fully document the assumptions, inputs, and analytical procedures used to develop proposed rates. Our reports provide clients with a detailed administrative record that can be referenced if rates are questioned or challenged in litigation.
▪ Collaboration with Legal Counsel: Maintaining a close partnership with City legal counsel throughout the rate study process is a priority. As complex, and potentially controversial, cost allocation or rate design cost recovery issues arise during the rate study process, we will request review and input from the City’s legal counsel.
▪ Review and Comment by the City: Raftelis welcomes the comprehensive review and comment of preliminary/draft reports by City staff, City legal counsel, and the City Board.

6.c
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 35 Deliverables:
▪ Draft cost-of-service rate study reports for review by City Staff and City Council ▪ Final cost-of-service rate study report
Task 8: Proposition 218 Notice and Hearings
The Raftelis Strategic Communications staff will prepare rate adjustment notices for mailing within the required 45-day notice period prior to holding the public hearing. While requirements of Proposition 218 notifications are easy to satisfy, many utilities miss the opportunity to strategically educate and inform ratepayers. Raftelis has designed countless Proposition 218 notifications that go beyond the minimum dictated by statute to deliver visually appealing pieces that customers want to read. The notices will outline the proposed rate changes, explain the right to challenge the rates, and will meet and comply with all notice requirements. Once these arrive in mailboxes, City customers will not only be properly notified, but will understand the City’s need and be more likely to support rate adjustments. Raftelis will deliver final press-ready documents for the City to print and mail notices to all parcel owners and customers of record.

Our proposed consulting fee includes two in-person presentations to City Council for the Proposition 218 process.

The first presentation will be a public meeting during which City Council authorizes the issuance of a Proposition 218 notice. The second presentation will be at the formal Proposition 218 hearing. All presentation material prepared by Raftelis will be provided to the City Leadership team for review prior to the City Council meetings.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposition 218 notice preparation
▪ Onsite attendance at two (2) Proposition 218 related City Council meetings

6.c
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit A - Scope (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

FEE SCHEDULE

WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLANS

AND COST OF SERVICE RATES STUDY

CITY OF EL CENTRO
APRIL 5, 2024
605 Third Street / Encinitas, CA 92024 / 760.942.5147
EXHIBIT B 6.d
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

6.d
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study i April 5, 2024
Abraham Campos, PE
City Engineer/Public Works Director
City of El Centro
307 West Brighton Avenue
El Centro, California 92243
Subject: Fee Schedule for Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study Dear Abraham Campos:

Our fee proposal includes an hourly rate for each classification of firm personnel and a not to exceed amount for each task. We are available to discuss this proposal and any changes in scope, approach, and commensurate fee that the City of El Centro requests.

Mr. Bob Ohlund has the authority to bind the firm. Please feel free to contact Project Manager Elizabeth Caliva at 760.479.4114 or [email protected] if you have questions regarding our proposal. We look forward to discussing our proposal with you and assisting the City with this endeavor.

Sincerely,
__________________________________ __________________________________ Elizabeth Caliva, PE Bob Ohlund, PE
Project Manager Vice President
This fee estimate is valid for 90 days from the date of this proposal; after 90 days, Dudek reserves the right to reassess the fee estimate, if necessary.

6.d
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study ii

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.d
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 1 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee Task W1. Water Master Plan Project Management
W1.1 Project Management and Coordination 16 24 40 20————— 100$27,200—————$27,200 W1.2 Water & Sewer Kickoff Meeting (In
Person)
888 12 16—4—2 58$15,230————$1,500$16,730
W1.3 Bi-Monthly Progress Meetings (Virtual,
14 Assumed)
—— 28 14————— 42$11,340—————$11,340
W1.4 City Staff meetings and City Council
Meetings
8— 1688———— 40$10,840————$1,000$11,840
W1.5 Monthly Invoicing and Progress Reports—— 24 12———— 24 60$13,440—————$13,440 Subtotal Task W1 32 32 116 66 24—4— 26 300 $78,050$—$—$—$— $2,500 $80,550 Task W2. Data Collection and Review
W2.1 Documents and Data Review——4 12888—— 40$10,220—————$10,220 W2.2 Prepare TM——2—— 244—— 30$7,210—————$7,210
Subtotal Task W2——6 128 32 12—— 70 $17,430$—$—$—$—$— $17,430 Task W3. Water Regulatory and Policy Review
W3.1 Regulatory and Policy Review——8—8 16— 16— 48$11,200—————$11,200 W3.2 Prepare TM——4—4 24— 24— 56$12,640—————$12,640
Subtotal Task W3—— 12— 12 40— 40— 104 $23,840$—$—$—$—$— $23,840 Task W4. Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment
W4.1 Field Investigation Deficiency Summary.——8 40 16—— 16— 80$20,600————$1,400$22,000 W4.2 Recommended improvements and
budgetary estimate
2—8 24 16—— 24— 74$18,300—————$18,300
W4.3 Recommended Improvements TM2—88 16—— 40— 74$17,020—————$17,020 Subtotal Task W44— 24 72 48—— 80— 228 $55,920$—$—$—$— $1,400 $57,320 Task W5. Water Storage Condition Assessment
W5.1 Data Collection + Review——2 16—4—8— 30$7,570——— $43,758—$51,328 W5.2 Field Investigation, Deficiency Summary—— 16 24 16 16— 16— 88$22,080————$1,200$23,280 W5.3 Recommended Improvements and
Budgetary Estimate
2—4 10 16 20— 40— 92$21,320—————$21,320
W5.4 Recommended Improvements TM2—— 16 16—— 40— 74$17,140—————$17,140 Subtotal Task W54— 22 66 48 40— 104— 284 $68,110$—$—$— $43,758 $1,200 $113,068 Task W6. Water Distribution System Condition Assessment W6.1 Develop Risk Model (LOF, COF, ROF) for
Pipelines & Manholes
——8—— 16——— 24$5,960—————$5,960

6.d
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 2 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee W6.2 Build Risk Model in AquaTwin Asset——8—— 24— 40— 72$15,880—————$15,880 W6.3 Run Risk Model, Tabulate & Present
Results
4— 16—— 16— 24— 60$14,040—————$14,040
W6.4 Recommended Improvements TM2—8—— 16— 40— 66$14,540—————$14,540 Subtotal Task W66— 40—— 72— 104— 222 $50,420$—$—$—$—$— $50,420 Task W7. Draft Capital Improvement Program
W7.1 Prioritize and Rank CIP Projects
(Pipeline, Reservoirs, WTP)
——88 24 24——— 64$16,240—————$16,240
W7.2 Develop Cost Estimates——448 16— 40— 72$16,060—————$16,060 W7.3 Project Descriptions and CIP Schedule2—4448— 16— 38$8,900—————$8,900 W7.4 CIP Review Workshop2—4244——— 16$4,180—————$4,180
Subtotal Task W74— 20 18 40 52— 56— 190 $45,380$—$—$—$—$— $45,380 Task W8. Water Master Plan Report
W8.1 Draft Water Master Plan Report8— 24 16 16 40— 404 148$35,460—————$35,460 W8.2 Draft Report Review Workshop——4444——— 16$4,160—————$4,160 W8.3 Final Water Master Plan Report2— 1288 20— 204 74$17,460————$500$17,960 Subtotal Task W8 10— 40 28 28 64— 608 238 $57,080$—$—$—$— $500 $57,580 Task S1. Data Collection and Field Investigations
S1.1 Data Collection + Review28— 24 23— 24 30— 111$26,805—————$26,805 S1.2 Lift Station Field Investigations (9
Locations) + Pre-Inspection Workshop
—2— 35 41—— 41— 119$28,985————$2,000$30,985
S1.3 WWTP Field Investigation—2— 314——4— 41$11,030————$2,000$13,030 S1.4 TM Summarizing Field Investigations24— 164——9— 35$8,940—————$8,940 Subtotal Task S14 16— 106 72— 24 84— 306 $75,760$—$—$—$— $4,000 $79,760 Task S2. GIS Gap Analyses & Needs Assessment
S2.1 Review GIS Data—2———84—— 14$3,370—————$3,370
S2.2 Needs Assessment24———4 12—— 22$5,360—————$5,360
S2.3 Survey Plan24————8—— 14$3,480—————$3,480
S2.4 Gaps Analysis TM—2———42——8$1,950—————$1,950
Subtotal Task S24 12——— 16 26—— 58 $14,160$—$—$—$—$— $14,160 Task S3. Temporary Flow Monitoring
S3.1 Develop Flow Monitoring Plan—4———— 16—— 20$4,740—————$4,740 S3.2 Conduct Flow Monitoring (9 FMs, 6
weeks)
—4————4——8$1,980—— $76,000——$77,980

6.d
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 3 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee S3.3 Process Flow Metering Results—2————4——6$1,450—————$1,450 Subtotal Task S3— 10———— 24—— 34 $8,170$—$— $76,000$—$— $84,170 Task S4. Establish Flow Criteria
S4.1 Develop Sewer Generation Factors by
LU Type
24———— 16—— 22$5,320—————$5,320
S4.2 Develop Diurnal Patterns—4————8—— 12 $2,900————— $2,900 S4.3 Develop Dry and Wet Weather Peaking
Factors
—2————4——6 $1,450————— $1,450
S4.4 Develop Sewer Design and Evaluation
Criteria
—2————4——6 $1,450————— $1,450
S4.5 Develop Buildout Sewer Flow
Projections
—8———— 16—— 24 $5,800————— $5,800
S4.6 Sewer Flow Criteria TM24————8—— 14 $3,480————— $3,480 Subtotal Task S44 24———— 56—— 84 $20,400$—$—$—$—$— $20,400 Task S5. Hydraulic Sewer Model Development + Calibration S5.1 Survey Plan24————8—— 14 $3,480————— $3,480
S5.2 Manhole Surveys—2————4——6 $1,450— $45,100——— $46,550 S5.3 Build Hydraulic Model—8———8 24—— 40 $9,560————— $9,560 S5.4 Calibrate Sewer Model—8———— 36—— 44 $10,400————— $10,400 S5.5 Sewer Model Development +
Calibration TM
28———— 16—— 26 $6,380————— $6,380
Subtotal Task S54 30———8 88—— 130 $31,270$— $45,100$—$—$— $76,370 Task S6. Hydraulic Sewer Model Analysis
S6.1 Existing Capacity Analysis—4———— 16—— 20 $4,740————— $4,740 S6.2 Buildout Scenario Development +
Capacity Analysis
—6———— 24—— 30 $7,110————— $7,110
S6.3 List of Pipeline Capacity Deficient Pipes
(Ex + Buildout)
—4————8—— 12 $2,900————— $2,900
S6.4 Hydraulic Analysis to Confirm Pipeline
Improvements (Ex + BO)
—8———— 12—— 20 $4,880————— $4,880
S6.5 TM with Capacity Analysis Results +
Graphics
24———— 16—— 22 $5,320————— $5,320
Subtotal Task S62 26———— 76—— 104 $24,950$—$—$—$—$— $24,950

6.d
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 4 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee Task S7. Sewer LS, Forcemain and WWTP Assessment & Resiliency Anlayses S7.1 Lift Stations/Forcemain Desktop
Analysis (Hydraulic/Capacity Ex +
Buildout, Emergency Capability,
Reliability, Resiliency, & Safety
Analyses)
— 2 — — 16 — — 24 — 42 $9,410 — — — — — $9,410
S7.2 Lift Stations Electrical,
Instrumentation/Controls Assessment
and Evaluation + Asset Scoring
2 — — 16 — — — 2 — 20 $5,460 — — — — — $5,460
S7.3 Lift Stations Mechanical, Structural,
Site/Civil, Odor/Ventilation
Assessment, Evaluation + Asset
Scoring
— — — — 4 — — 28 — 32 $6,620 — — — — $400 $7,020
S7.4 Lift Stations Deficiencies Identification
+ Develop Recommendations
— — — 4 8 — — 8 — 20 $4,760 — — — — — $4,760
S7.5 Lift Stations Capital Cost Estimates 2 — — 4 8 — — 16 — 30 $6,940 — — — — — $6,940 S7.6 Lift Stations Recommended
Improvements TM
2 2 — 4 4 — — 24 — 36 $8,050 — $10,000 — — — $18,050
S7.7 WWTP General Structural, Lifespan,
and Process Assessment + Capacity
Analysis
2 — — 16 24 — — 16 — 58 $14,380 — — — — — $14,380
S7.8 WWTP Deficiencies Identification +
Develop Recommendations
— — — 8 8 — — 16 — 32 $7,480 — — — — — $7,480
S7.9 WWTP Capital Cost Estimates 4 — — 4 4 — — 16 — 28 $6,500 — — — — — $6,500 S7.10 WWTP Recommended Improvements
TM
2 2 — 8 8 — — 40 — 60 $13,390 — $10,000 — — — $23,390
Subtotal Task S7 14 6 — 64 84 — — 190 — 358 $82,990 $— $20,000 $— $— $400 $103,390 Task S8. Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Report Update
S8.1 Draft Sewer Master Plan Report +
Graphics
8 24 — 8 16 16 40 40 4 156 $36,660 — — — — — $36,660
S8.2 Draft Report Review Workshop — 4 — 2 2 — 4 — — 12 $3,050 — — — — — $3,050 S8.3 Final Sewer Master Plan Report +
Graphics
4 12 — 4 8 8 24 24 4 88 $20,360 — — — — $500 $20,860
Subtotal Task S8 12 40 — 14 26 24 68 64 8 256 $60,070 $— $— $— $— $500 $60,570 Task S9. Capital Improvement Program
S9.1 Prioritize and Rank CIP Projects
(Pipeline, LS, WWTP)
2 8 — 16 16 — 16 — — 58 $14,940 — $10,000 — — — $24,940 S9.2 Develop Cost Estimates 4 8 — 8 8 — 16 24 — 68 $16,040 — — — — — $16,040 S9.3 Project Descriptions and CIP Schedule 2 2 — 4 4 — 8 16 — 36 $8,290 — — — — — $8,290

6.d
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 5 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee S9.4 CIP Review Workshop24—22—4—— 14 $3,630————— $3,630 Subtotal Task S9 10 22— 30 30— 44 40— 176 $42,900$— $10,000$—$—$— $52,900 Task S10. Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment
S10.1 Condition Assessment (Assumes 100
segments)
—2——4—8 30— 44 $9,390————— $9,390
S10.2 Condition Assessment Summary Report22——4—48— 20 $4,650————— $4,650 Subtotal Task S1024——8— 12 38— 64 $14,040$—$—$—$—$— $14,040 Task S11. Sewer Master Plan Project Management
S5.1 Project Management and Coordination— 48—88———— 64 $17,000————— $17,000 S5.2 Kickoff Meeting (In-Person) (Included in
W1.2)
——————————$——————$—
S5.3 Bi-Monthly Progress Meetings (Virtual,
32 Assumed)
— 128— 32 32— 32—— 224 $58,400————— $58,400
S5.4 City Staff Meetings (4) and City Council
Meetings (2 In-Person)
8 24—88—8—4 60 $15,420————— $15,420
S5.5 Monthly Invoicing and Progress Reports— 24—88——— 24 64 $14,360————— $14,360 Subtotal Task S112 224— 56 56— 40— 28 412 $105,180$—$—$—$—$— $105,180 Task R1. Water Cost of Service Rate & Capacity Fee Study R1.1 Project Management and Coordination—— 40—————— 40 $10,600 $5,866———— $16,466 R1.2 Analysis of Customer Water
Consumption and Demand Forecasting
——————————$— $7,183———— $7,183
R1.3 Financial Planning and Revenue
Requirement Forecasting
——————————$— $7,689———— $7,689
R1.4 Cost-of-Service Analysis——————————$— $7,128———— $7,128 R1.5 Rate Structure Design and Proposed
Rates
——————————$— $12,573———— $12,573
R1.6 Capacity Fee Study (Water and Sewer)——————————$— $8,701———— $8,701 R1.7 Cost-of-Service Rate Study Reports——————————$— $11,671———— $11,671 R1.8 Proposition 218 Notice and Hearings——————————$— $8,807———— $8,807 R1.9 Total Expenses——————————$— $4,631———— $4,631
Subtotal R1.1—— 40—————— 40 $10,600 $74,249$—$—$—$— $84,849 Task R2. Sewer Cost of Service Rate & Capacity Fee Study R2.1 Project Management and Coordination— 40——————— 40 $10,600 $5,866———— $16,466 R2.2 Analysis of Customer Water
Consumption and Demand Forecasting
——————————$— $4,576———— $4,576

6.d
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 6 Dudek Labor Hours and Rates Subconsultant Fees
Other Direct
Costs Total Fee
Project Team Role: PIC - QA/ QC
Project
Manager
Deputy
Project
Manager
Senior Task
Lead Task Lead
Senior
Engineer/
GIS
Senior
Engineer/
Modeling
Project
Engineers Admin
Total
Dudek
Hours
Dudek Labor
Costs
Rate Study +
Capacity
Fees
Sewer
Survey
Analysis +
QC Review
Flow
Monitoring Structural
Team Member: Bergholz Caliva Ripperger
Scheidel
Schneider
Lacap
Combs
Guillen Brown
Li
Wang
Markle
Bugala Kinney Raftelis NV5 ADS Kelsey
Billable Rate : $290 $265 $265 $280 $255 $240 $230 $200 $155 Fee Fee Fee Fee R2.3 Financial Planning and Revenue
Requirement Forecasting
——————————$— $6,677———— $6,677
R2.4 Cost-of-Service Analysis——————————$— $7,128———— $7,128 R2.5 Rate Structure Design and Proposed
Rates
——————————$— $7,183———— $7,183
R2.6 Capacity Fee Study (Water and Sewer)——————————$— $7,689———— $7,689 R2.7 Cost-of-Service Rate Study Reports——————————$— $9,933———— $9,933 R2.8 Proposition 218 Notice and Hearings——————————$— $8,807———— $8,807 R2.9 Total Expenses——————————$— $4,400———— $4,400
Subtotal Task R2— 40——————— 40 $10,600 $62,259$—$—$—$— $72,859 Total Non-Optional Hours and Fee 124 486 320 532 484 348 474 860 70 3698 $897,320 $136,508 $75,100 $76,000 $43,758 $10,500 $1,239,186 Percent of Hours: 3% 13% 9% 14% 13% 9% 13% 23% 2% 100%——————— Optional Services
Task W9. Reservoir Float Investigation
W9.1 Reservoir Float Investigation——— 16——— 32— 48 $10,880——— $7,260 $2,500 $20,640 Subtotal Task W9——— 16——— 32— 48 $10,880$—$—$— $7,260 $2,500 $20,640 Task S12. Supplemental Wet Well Inspections
S12.1 Supplemental Wet Well Inspections———— 16—— 24— 40 $8,880————— $8,880 Subtotal Task S12———— 16—— 24— 40 $8,880$—$—$—$—$— $8,880 Task S13. WW Structural Review by Kelsey
S13.1 WWTP Condition Assessment————8—— 16— 24 $5,240——— $30,448— $35,688 S13.2 Lift Station Condition Assessment————8————8 $2,040——— $7,260— $9,300 Subtotal Task S13———— 16—— 16— 32 $7,280$—$—$— $37,708$— $44,988

6.d
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) DUDEK 2024 Standard Schedule of Charges
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2024
Engineering Services
Project Director.........................................................................$335.00/hr Principal Engineer lll.................................................................$310.00/hr Principal Engineer II .................................................................$290.00/hr Principal Engineer I ..................................................................$280.00/hr Program Manager.....................................................................$265.00/hr Senior Project Manager ...........................................................$265.00/hr Project Manager .......................................................................$255.00/hr Senior Engineer III ....................................................................$250.00/hr Senior Engineer II ....................................................................$240.00/hr Senior Engineer I .....................................................................$230.00/hr Project Engineer IV/Technician IV...........................................$220.00/hr Project Engineer llI/Technician III ...........................................$210.00/hr Project Engineer lI/Technician II .............................................$200.00/hr Project Engineer I/Technician I ...............................................$180.00/hr 3D Production Manager...........................................................$210.00/hr Senior Designer II .....................................................................$200.00/hr Senior Designer I ......................................................................$195.00/hr Designer....................................................................................$185.00/hr Assistant Designer....................................................................$180.00/hr CADD Operator III......................................................................$175.00/hr CADD Operator II.......................................................................$165.00/hr CADD Operator I........................................................................$145.00/hr CADD Drafter.............................................................................$135.00/hr CADD Technician ......................................................................$120.00/hr Project Coordinator ..................................................................$155.00/hr Engineering Assistant...............................................................$125.00/hr Environmental Services
Senior Project Director.............................................................$330.00/hr Project Director.........................................................................$285.00/hr Senior Specialist V....................................................................$260.00/hr Senior Specialist IV...................................................................$245.00/hr Senior Specialist III ..................................................................$235.00/hr Senior Specialist II ...................................................................$225.00/hr Senior Specialist I ....................................................................$210.00/hr Specialist V................................................................................$195.00/hr Specialist IV...............................................................................$185.00/hr Specialist III ..............................................................................$175.00/hr Specialist II ...............................................................................$165.00/hr Specialist I ................................................................................$155.00/hr Analyst V ...................................................................................$145.00/hr Analyst IV ..................................................................................$135.00/hr Analyst III ...................................................................................$125.00/hr Analyst II ....................................................................................$115.00/hr Analyst I .....................................................................................$105.00/hr Technician III ..............................................................................$90.00/hr Technician II ...............................................................................$80.00/hr Technician I ................................................................................$70.00/hr Mapping and Surveying Services
Application Developer II ..........................................................$220.00/hr Application Developer I ...........................................................$155.00/hr GIS Analyst V ............................................................................$205.00/hr GIS Analyst IV ...........................................................................$170.00/hr GIS Analyst III ............................................................................$150.00/hr GIS Analyst II .............................................................................$135.00/hr GIS Analyst I ..............................................................................$125.00/hr UAS Pilot ...................................................................................$145.00/hr Survey Lead .............................................................................$235.00/hr Survey Manager .......................................................................$210.00/hr Survey Crew Chief.....................................................................$165.00/hr Survey Rod Person ...................................................................$120.00/hr Survey Mapping Technician.......................................................$95.00/hr Construction Management Services
Principal/Manager....................................................................$195.00/hr Senior Construction Manager .................................................$185.00/hr Senior Project Manager ...........................................................$180.00/hr Construction Manager .............................................................$175.00/hr Project Manager .......................................................................$170.00/hr Resident Engineer....................................................................$175.00/hr Construction Engineer..............................................................$170.00/hr On-site Owner’s Representative..............................................$160.00/hr Prevailing Wage Inspector .......................................................$155.00/hr Construction Inspector.............................................................$145.00/hr Administrator/Labor Compliance............................................$120.00/hr Hydrogeology/HazWaste Services
Project Director.........................................................................$335.00/hr Principal Hydrogeologist/Engineer III .....................................$310.00/hr Principal Hydrogeologist/Engineer II ......................................$300.00/hr Principal Hydrogeologist/Engineer I .......................................$290.00/hr Senior Hydrogeologist V/Engineer V.......................................$265.00/hr Senior Hydrogeologist IV/Engineer IV.....................................$255.00/hr Senior Hydrogeologist III/Engineer III .....................................$245.00/hr Senior Hydrogeologist II/Engineer II .......................................$235.00/hr Senior Hydrogeologist I/Engineer I .........................................$225.00/hr Project Hydrogeologist V/Engineer V......................................$215.00/hr Project Hydrogeologist IV/Engineer IV....................................$205.00/hr Project Hydrogeologist III/Engineer III ....................................$195.00/hr Project Hydrogeologist II/Engineer II ......................................$185.00/hr Project Hydrogeologist I/Engineer I ........................................$175.00/hr Hydrogeologist/Engineering Assistant ...................................$140.00/hr HazMat Field Technician…………………………………..……………..$125.00/hr District Management & Operations
District General Manager.........................................................$230.00/hr District Engineer.......................................................................$215.00/hr Operations Manager ...............................................................$165.00/hr District Secretary/Accountant ................................................$145.00/hr Collections System Manager...................................................$145.00/hr Grade V Operator......................................................................$135.00/hr Grade IV Operator.....................................................................$115.00/hr Grade III Operator.....................................................................$110.00/hr Grade II Operator........................................................................ $90.00/hr Grade I Operator......................................................................... $80.00/hr Operator in Training ................................................................... $75.00/hr Collection Maintenance Worker ............................................... $80.00/hr Creative Services
Creative Services IV..................................................................$175.00/hr Creative Services III..................................................................$150.00/hr Creative Services II...................................................................$140.00/hr Creative Services I....................................................................$125.00/hr Publications Services
Technical Editor lV....................................................................$175.00/hr Technical Editor lll ....................................................................$150.00/hr Technical Editor ll .....................................................................$140.00/hr Technical Editor l ......................................................................$125.00/hr Publications Specialist lV.........................................................$130.00/hr Publications Specialist lll.........................................................$115.00/hr Publications Specialist ll..........................................................$110.00/hr Publications Specialist l...........................................................$100.00/hr Clerical Administration............................................................... $90.00/hr Expert Witness – Court appearances, depositions, and interrogatories as expert witness will be billed at 2.00 times normal rates.

Emergency and Holidays – Minimum charge of two hours will be billed at 1.75 times the normal rate.

Material and Outside Services – Subcontractors, rental of special equipment, special reproductions and blueprinting, outside data processing and computer services, etc., are charged at 1.15 times the direct cost.

Travel Expenses – Mileage at current IRS allowable rates. Per diem where overnight stay is involved is charged at cost
Invoices, Late Charges – All fees will be billed to Client monthly and shall be due and payable upon receipt. Invoices are delinquent if not paid within 30 days from the date of the invoice. Client agrees to pay interest at a 10% annual rate for amounts unpaid greater than 30 days after the date of the invoice.

Annual Increases – Unless identified otherwise, these standard rates will increase in line with the CPI-U for the nearest urban area per the Department of Labor Statistics to where the work is being completed) or by 3% annually, whichever is higher.

Prevailing Wage – The rates listed above assume prevailing wage rates do not apply. If this assumption is incorrect Dudek reserves the right to adjust its rates accordingly.

6.d
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

6.d
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

6.d
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 800.450.1818 | [email protected]
DUDEK.COM

6.d
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit B - Fee Schedule (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

PROPOSAL

WATER AND SEWER MASTER

PLANS AND COST OF SERVICE

RATES STUDY

CITY OF EL CENTRO
APRIL 5, 2024
605 Third Street / Encinitas, CA 92024 / 760.942.5147

6.e
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

6.e
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study i Cover Letter
April 5, 2024
Abraham Campos, PE
City Engineer/Public Works Director
City of El Centro
307 West Brighton Avenue
El Centro, California 92243
Subject: Proposal for Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study Dear Abraham Campos:

Dudek appreciates the opportunity to provide the following proposal to the City of El Centro (City) for the Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study
project. Dudek recognizes that the City desires to take a comprehensive review of its water and sewer systems and rates, including understanding current and future water supplies, water demand, and conservation; assessing
current system conditions and impacts of future
development; and analyzing system capacities. We believe our qualifications and experience demonstrate our
capability to meet the City’s goals for this project.

We have teamed with Raftelis Inc. (Raftelis) to provide rate study services and financial analysis. Raftelis has
experience developing pricing objectives that deliver rate structures that best meet strategic and operational goals, considering water conservation, affordability concerns, economic development, and other City-defined objectives.

They have developed thousands of customized rate
structures and fees to meet specific client goals and can assist in gaining buy-in and adoption, if necessary. Dudek has successfully teamed with Raftelis on several recent projects and considers the firm a trusted partner.

Our project managers, Elizabeth Caliva and Greg Ripperger, and their teams are experts in master planning and rate studies and have assisted many Southern California municipalities with the services requested in your Request for Proposals (RFP). We are currently working on two similar master plans for other cities in Southern California, including model development, condition assessment, and capital improvement program (CIP) development. We have carefully and thoroughly reviewed the RFP and believe our team will provide valuable assistance to the City in your master planning efforts.

DUDEK AT A GLANCE
▪ Multidisciplinary engineering and
environmental services
▪ Founded in 1980
▪ 19 offices nationwide, 13 in California
▪ 800+ employees
▪ 100% employee-owned
▪ Financially strong
▪ 2020 Small Project (under $10M) Award
of Merit on the U.S. Best of the Best List
(Engineering News-Record, 2020)
▪ Silver medal in sustainability
achievement (EcoVadis, 2021)
▪ Top 110 U.S. Environmental Firms
(Engineering News-Record, 2023)
▪ Top 55 California Design Firms
(Engineering News-Record, 2022)
▪ Top 50 Trenchless Design Firms
(Trenchless Technology, 2022)

6.e
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study ii Dudek acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1 on March 15, 2024. We have carefully reviewed the sample agreement and insurance requirements and can meet the requirements outlined in Exhibit C. A sample insurance certificate is included in our proposal. Signed Levine Act Statements for Dudek and all subconsultants are provided in Appendix B.

Thank you for your time and attention to our proposal; we look forward to discussing it soon. Should you require further information, please contact Project Manager Elizabeth Caliva at 760.479.4114 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
__________________________________ __________________________________ Bob Ohlund, PE Elizabeth Caliva, PE
Vice President Project Manager
Bob Ohlund is authorized to sign on behalf of Dudek.

6.e
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study iii Table of Contents

SECTIONS
Cover Letter...................................................................................................................................................................................... i Proposed Approach........................................................................................................................................................................1 Proposed Staffing Plan ............................................................................................................................................................... 41 Previous Experience.................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Agreement Exclusions................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Modified Scope of Work.............................................................................................................................................................. 57 Lawsuit History............................................................................................................................................................................. 59 Insurance ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 TABLES
1 Summary of Existing Lift Stations ..................................................................................................................................4 2 Summary of Lift Station Site Investigations and Requirements.............................................................................. 14 3 Summary of Planned Lift Station and WWTP Site Investigation Days and Durations ........................................... 15 4 Current Rates................................................................................................................................................................ 29 5 Current Sewer Rates .................................................................................................................................................... 29 6 Example Tier Structure................................................................................................................................................. 31 7 Current Capacity Fees .................................................................................................................................................. 32 8 Key Personnel Qualifications and Experience ........................................................................................................... 44 9 Dudek Master Planning Experience (Past 5 Years)................................................................................................... 47 10 Summary of Legal Claims in Last 10 Years ............................................................................................................... 59

FIGURES
1 Priority vs. Build-Out.........................................................................................................................................................3 2 Lift Stations Condition Assessment Flow Chart............................................................................................................6 3 Wet Well Inspection Video Screen Captures from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District B-Series Lift Stations Condition Assessment Project...........................................................................................7 4 Work Plan Approach........................................................................................................................................................9 5 Condition Assessment Flow......................................................................................................................................... 22 6 Financial Planning Process.......................................................................................................................................... 26 7 Water Cost-of-Service Process..................................................................................................................................... 28 8 Sewer Cost-of-Service Process.................................................................................................................................... 28 9 Proposed Project Schedule.......................................................................................................................................... 37 10 Dudek Team Organization ........................................................................................................................................... 42

6.e
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study iv APPENDICES A Resumes B Required Forms

6.e
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 1 Proposed Approach
Project Understanding
The following outlines our understanding of the City of El Centro’s (City) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Rate Studies project.

WATER MASTER PLAN
As requested in the Request for Proposals (RFP), our proposed Water Master Plan will primarily focus on condition assessment. We will conduct field inspections of the City’s major assets, rating each of the assets based on multiple applicable factors. We will use a condition- and criticality-based scoring system to rank each of the major assets, which will be combined and used in the prioritization of the recommended improvements. We will conduct condition assessments for the following assets:

Water Treatment Plant
The City’s Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is permitted
to treat up to 21 million gallons per day (mgd) of
raw canal water and consists of two upflow
clarifiers, two gravity dual media filters, and
chlorine disinfection. The WTP currently produces 5
mgd and 11 mgd during peak winter and summer
demand conditions, respectively.

The WTP produces excellent quality potable water and
was observed to be in good condition. The filter media
was recently replaced, and the disinfection process
was recently converted from gaseous chlorine to liquid sodium hypochlorite. Several potential improvements to WTP operations were noted during the Dudek site visit on March 26, including modifications to the filter drains to allow for complete removal of water during maintenance activities, replacement of leaking filter-to-waste valves, and an increase in filter capacity to meet summer demands.

The original WTP was constructed in the mid-1960s. The raw water pump stations, located at the raw water ponds, are powered and controlled from the original WTP. The plant staff is currently in the process of replacing the raw water pump variable frequency drives (VFDs) and re-powering them from an existing motor control center in the original WTP. The finished water distribution pump station, which distributes finished water from the 21 mgd WTP, is located at the original WTP and is powered and controlled from the original WTP. The control and telemetry system appears to have been upgraded over the years. Although the distribution pump VFDs and upstream switchboard appear to have been upgraded, both pump stations are powered by electrical equipment, including the original plant’s main switchboard, which is estimated to be over 50 years old.

Our approach to performing the condition assessment of the WTP will include an approach similar to the steps outlined in Figure 2 on Page 6. Each major process area (e.g., clarifiers, filters, chemical feed systems) will be evaluated with input from WTP operations staff. A workshop will be held at which City operations staff and the

6.e
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 2 Dudek team will discuss the condition of major process areas. The workshop will be followed by a site walk to document and photograph areas of concern. The site walk condition assessment will be scheduled in conjunction with a site walk at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP).

Reservoirs
The City has four aboveground water storage reservoirs in operation and two ponds. Three of the four reservoirs and the ponds are located at the WTP. The reservoirs and ponds include the following:

1. WTP Steel Raw Water Reservoir – 5.0 million gallons (MG) (above ground)

2. WTP Steel Raw Water Reservoir – 2.5 MG (above ground)

3. WTP Steel Raw Water Reservoir – 2.5 MG (above ground)

4. La Brucherie Steel Raw Water Reservoir – 4.0 MG (above ground)

5. WTP raw water ponds (2)
According to the RFP, the City resurfaced the WTP tanks in 2015 and the La Brucherie reservoir in 2011.

Dudek will perform structural condition assessments of each reservoir. The assessment work is anticipated to be performed while the reservoirs are in operation. Site investigations will consist of an exterior assessment of the reservoirs and limited interior assessment view through the reservoir roof hatches (no entry), where possible. We will also review internal inspection reports provided by the City. If additional interior assessment is necessary, we have provided an optional task to conduct an interior float investigation of each of the steel reservoirs. These investigations will be performed using a two-person inflatable dinghy disinfected following American Water Works Association (AWWA) guidelines prior to entry. Floating the interior of the reservoirs provides the best opportunity to assess the condition of the roof framing where, typically, corrosion and deterioration are the most severe. Due to the fluctuating water levels and oxygen in the vapor zone, steel reservoir deterioration is typically concentrated above the water line.

Raw water ponds assessments will include concrete slope and lining assessments. Investigation methods shall be nondestructive in nature and shall consist primarily of visual observations of the exterior and interior surfaces where possible through access/roof hatches.

Distribution System
Dudek has begun incorporating risk-based condition assessment for our water and sewer Master Plans, just as described in the RFP. We are currently conducting them for two other clients as part of their capital improvement program (CIP) development and agree that it is currently the best method for prioritizing pipeline replacements.

Risk-based scoring considers the consequences of poor condition, increased likelihood of failure (LOF), and safety. It combines the typical LOF and consequence of failure (COF) approach to assessing risk to prioritize pipeline replacement based on the scoring of individual assets.

For the risk-based condition assessment of the linear infrastructure, Dudek proposed to use asset management software by Aquanuity (AquaTwin Asset) to perform risk analysis. AquaTwin Asset is a geographic information system (GIS) software package that allows for pipeline condition assessment ratings to be combined with age and material of pipe, maintenance records, locations of other utilities, roadways, railroads, storm channels, or other waterways, and any number of additional factors. Dudek will propose a risk model (LOF, COF, and risk of failure [ROF]) and present the model to the City for confirmation/revision. Once confirmed, Dudek will build the risk model

6.e
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 3 in AquaTwin Asset and run the risk model to determine the overall risk for the pipelines, draft recommendations, and grouping of the projects. These recommendations will be used in the CIP development.

SEWER MASTER PLAN
With a current population of approximately 45,000, the City of El Centro’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan projects the City will increase its population by approximately 13,000 by 2045, a growth of 29% from current population estimates. This continued growth potential puts the City in a unique position among more built-out cities by needing to focus on both condition assessment of aging sewer system assets and capacity analysis to accommodate for future growth. This approach is also consistent with the reissued 2022 Statewide Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), which now requires a condition assessment as part of the System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan component of the Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), for which an agency’s sewer Master Plan is typically used.

The City’s sewer collection system consists of over 125 miles of gravity pipeline ranging from 4 to 36 inches in diameter, 14 lift stations, and the WWTP. The collection system pipelines are aging, with some pipelines constructed 100 years ago and average pipeline age of 70 years. The soils beneath the City are unstable in many areas, leading to sags in several areas of the collection system. Several of the City’s lift stations are aging, two of which are 36 years and 49 years old, and another which still includes assets over 90 years in age. The City WWTP facilities are showing significant signs of aging as well, with many facilities beyond their useful life and assets that are no longer operational as noted during a site visit by Dudek on March 26, 2024.

The following subsections provide more detail on the approach for the sewer collection system, lift stations, and WWTP.

Sewer Collection System
The hydraulic model utilized for the 2008 Sewer Master Plan is not available. Following the GIS Gap analysis of the sewer collection system GIS (Task S2), Dudek will develop a plan to survey and collect accurate invert elevations of approximately 100 strategically located manholes to support the construction of a skeletonized sewer hydraulic model for collection system capacity analysis. We propose 6 weeks of sewer flow monitoring at nine locations to support the accurate representation of flows in the system and ideally collect a significant wet weather event for wet weather model calibration. As a modification to the RFP, Dudek proposes condition assessment of 100 sewer segments to provide sewer pipeline condition assessment for inclusion in the Sewer CIP to comply with the Reissued WDR. Both capacity- and condition-related deficiencies identified in the work will be included in the sewer CIP.

Dudek anticipates a multiphase, multiyear approach to survey the full collection system and update the GIS with sufficient accurate invert and ground surface information to eventually build a complete sewer collection system model. Dudek will include future phases of sewer collection system GIS and model development as CIP project recommendations.

Figure 1. Priority vs. Build-Out

6.e
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 4 Lift Stations
Several of the older lift stations have undergone improvements in the past 20 years, while a number of the smaller capacity stations still require rehabilitation to address aging assets. Table 1 summarizes our initial understanding of the approximate age, capacity, and improvements history of the City’s existing lift stations. This table was developed based on information included in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan, as well as recent discussions with City operations staff.

Table 1. Summary of Existing Lift Stations
Facility Name
Current age
based on
2008 SMP
(years)
Firm Capacity
based on
2008 SMP
(gpm)
Future
Capacity
Upgrade
Required
per 2008
SMP
Force
Main
Diameter
(in) Comments from Operations Staff
Lift Station No. 3 18 18,000 Yes 24 ▪ Pumps equipped with VFDs, but recently modified to switch to
constant speed with soft
starters as the VFDs fail
▪ Facility does not receive
constant flow
▪ Wet well access is limited to a
single hatch, wet well never
inspected due to limited
access/visibility from grade
Alder Canal/Villa
Avenue
19 3,820 Yes 20 ▪ Lift station is oversized;
originally sized for future
commercial development that
was never constructed
▪ Pumps operate on VFDs
▪ Force main diameter is too large
for low influent flows; sewage
turns septic due to time in force
main, major source of foul odor
issues downstream
Main 91 5,070 No 30 ▪ Improvements constructed in
2006; new pumps, suction
discharge piping, valves,
replacement of all access stairs
and landings
▪ Operator indicated there are still
older/original assets at facility
▪ Station receives constant flow,
runs all day on VFDs.

Eastside (Recently
rebuilt)
1,000 No 10 ▪ This station was rebuilt recently
and is in good condition
Lift Station No. 1 49 400 No 6 ▪ Most assets are from original lift station construction

6.e
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 5 Table 1. Summary of Existing Lift Stations
Facility Name
Current age
based on
2008 SMP
(years)
Firm Capacity
based on
2008 SMP
(gpm)
Future
Capacity
Upgrade
Required
per 2008
SMP
Force
Main
Diameter
(in) Comments from Operations Staff
▪ Pumps were switched out
recently for Gorman Rupp
eradicators
Lift Station No. 2 (Recently
rebuilt)
420 Yes 8 ▪ Facility was replaced 4 years
ago and is in good condition
8th and Wake 18 200 No 6 ▪ Facility is still in good condition Gios 21 250 No 4 ▪ Facility is in fair condition
3rd and Ross 36 325 No 4 ▪ Very minimal emergency
storage capacity at this station
▪ Operations staff concerned with
high risk of sewer overflow due
to lack of emergency features
▪ Concrete in wet well is in fair to
poor condition
Heil and Dogwood 26 250 No 6 ▪ This station receives minimal influent flow
▪ Operations staff suggests
exploring the feasibility of
eliminating this station and
redirecting flow elsewhere if
possible
Buena Vista 18 N/A No 8 ▪ Facility has undergone some
improvements since original
construction
Orange Avenue 19 280 Yes 4 ▪ Wet well liner is failing and peeling away from interior
concrete
Countryside South 21 70 No 6 ▪ Wet well liner is failing and peeling away from interior
concrete
4th and Wake* N/A N/A N/A N/A ▪ This station was not
documented in the 2008 SMP
▪ Wet well is older and requires
inspection
Notes:

SMP = Sewer Master Plan; gpm = gallons per minute; in = inch; VFD = variable frequency drive; N/A = not applicable. * 4th and Wake Lift Station was not documented in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan. This lift station is assumed to be included in the lift station assessment.

6.e
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 6 Dudek understands that a condition assessment and resiliency analysis is required to analyze whether existing lift stations and force mains are adequate in case of emergency work or failure. When performing a lift station condition assessment, Dudek performs a comprehensive assessment to identify specific site civil, mechanical, structural, electrical, and controls improvements to extend the useful life and provide increased reliability of each facility.

Additionally, evaluation of safety, emergency features, and access reduce the risk of injury, reduce risk of sewer spill, and prevent negative impacts to the environment and surrounding community. Dudek’s approach to lift station condition assessment focuses on the following:
▪ Direct communication and discussions with City operations staff to understand specific lift station nuances and staff preferences
▪ Developing a thorough understanding of each lift station’s historical issues and maintenance history prior to performing the field inspections
▪ Application of our technical design and condition assessment knowledge to develop practical and economical improvement recommendations with associated budgetary project cost estimates As such, Dudek will implement the following workflow (Figure 2) to optimize the condition assessment, resiliency analysis, and evaluation of the City’s existing lift stations.

Dudek’s initial examination of the age, capacity, and improvement history of the City’s existing lift stations works in part towards our approach to lift station condition assessment and evaluation. Understanding the differences in age and improvement history from facility to facility, Dudek’s approach to this condition assessment involves allocating more evaluation time to lift stations that are older in age, lift stations that are more critical to overall system operation, and lift stations that have not undergone improvements in the past 20 years. These lift stations in theory are more Figure 2. Lift Stations Condition Assessment Flow Chart

6.e
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 7 susceptible to failing assets and require a comprehensive condition assessment to develop improvement recommendations to extend the useful life and improve the operation and reliability of the station.

As defined in Task W7 of our scope of services, Dudek will perform a desktop analysis including a hydraulic analysis, a capacity evaluation, an emergency capability evaluation, a reliability evaluation, and an evaluation for feasibility of lift station elimination for all lift stations. We will also conduct a workshop with operations and maintenance (O&M) staff to understand historical issues, current concerns, preferences, operational nuances, and emergency capabilities at each lift station. This desktop evaluation in combination with the lift station workshop will assist Dudek in developing recommended improvements and operational planning for the younger and more recently rehabilitated lift stations. For the older and more critical lift stations, Dudek will supplement the desktop analysis and workshop with a field investigation. These supplemental field investigations will document the physical condition of major assets to help develop recommendations for either rehabilitation or replacement.

The selected field investigations will include video documentation of the existing wet wells. Dudek will utilize a 360 GoPro camera attached to a telescoping pole (with a 25-foot extendable length) with auxiliary LED lighting to provide full high-quality, 360-degree video documentation of the interior of the wet wells. Figure 3 includes examples from recent wet well inspections performed by Dudek using out pole-mounted 360 GoPro inspection equipment.

Figure 3. Wet Well Inspection Video Screen Captures from the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District BSeries Lift Stations Condition Assessment Project Following the field investigations, Dudek will then use a condition- and criticality-based scoring system to score each of the major lift station assets, which is used as a tool to assist us in prioritization of the recommended improvements. Dudek has also recently implemented this same successful streamlined approach as part of the Wastewater Master Plant Update for Olivenhain Municipal Water District in 2023.

6.e
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 8 Wastewater Treatment Plant
The City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is
permitted to discharge up to 8.0 mgd and consists of
a headworks with a Parkson Aqua Guard screen, two
primary clarifiers, six aeration basins with activated
sludge treatment, four secondary clarifiers, UV
disinfection, anaerobic digestion, and waste sludge
dewatering. Treated effluent is discharged to the
Central Main, which is a tributary to the Alamo River.

Primary sludge and thickened waste-activated sludge
are anaerobically digested in a two-stage digestion
process. Digester gas or natural gas can be used to
run a boiler for digester heating. Digested sludge is
stored in a sludge storage tank prior to dewatering by
two belt filter presses. Dewatered cake is spread on site for further drying before it is hauled off and land-applied out of state.

The WWTP currently treats around 3.6 mgd and appears to have adequate capacity to meet its current discharge permit. The City has recently installed a bar screen upstream of Lift Station 3, replaced two aeration basin blowers, installed a blower master control panel, and replaced both standby diesel generators with standby natural gas generators; and the City is also in the process of improving the UV disinfection system. Several locations within the WWTP are in need of rehabilitation. Severe corrosion of the primary splitter box, likely due to high hydrogen sulfide concentrations in plant influent, were observed during the Dudek site walk. The failing concrete and grating create unsafe conditions for operators. Concrete spalling was also observed at the aeration basins. The poor condition of aeration basin concrete has caused step feed and isolation slide gates to become inoperable in addition to safety concerns associated with poorly anchored handrails and grating. Isolation valves at the secondary clarifiers no longer work, and operators must manually plug lines to perform maintenance on the clarifiers and return activated sludge/waste activated sludge (RAS/WAS) pumps. The anaerobic digestion system suffers from poor concrete structure condition, lack of access for maintenance and cleaning of digesters, and struvite clogging on much of the sludge lines. With exception of the generators, the rest of the electrical system is of varying ages, assumed to be approximately 30 to 50 years old. Plant controls vary by plant area. For example, the primary sludge pumps are operated in auto mode by timers in the local control panel at the primary clarifiers, the RAS and WAS pump speeds are manually controlled by the operators, and the newer blowers are automatically controlled by the master blower control panel. Only the master blower control panel reports to the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system in the administration building from the plant. An autodialer provides alarm messages to staff via phone or text.

Our approach to performing the condition assessment of the WWTP will include a similar approach to the steps outlined in Figure 2. Each major process area (e.g., headworks, primary clarifiers, aeration basins, secondary clarifiers and RAS/WAS pumps, disinfection, digestion, and sludge processing) will be evaluated with input from WWTP operations staff. A workshop will be held at which City operations staff and the Dudek team will discuss the condition of major process areas. The workshop will be followed by a site walk to document and photograph areas of concern. The site walk condition assessment will be scheduled in conjunction with a site walk at the WTP.

6.e
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 9 Implementation Work Plan
The Implementation Work Plan provides a roadmap for how significant elements of the scope of work relate to each other and lead to the preparation of project deliverables. For example, Figure 4 illustrates how we propose progressing the City's Water and Sewer Master Plans.

Figure 4. Work Plan Approach

6.e
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan

Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 10 Scope of Services

WATER MASTER PLAN
Task W1: Water Master Plan Project Management
Good project management and quality control are vital to completing any project, including kickoff meetings, monthly progress meetings, and City meetings. We will provide monthly progress reports at each meeting, including a schedule update.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one in-person project kickoff meeting at City offices (both Water and Sewer). ▪ There will be 14 virtual bimonthly project status meetings for the Water Master Plan. ▪ There will be four virtual City staff meetings.
▪ There will be two in-person City Council presentations for the Water Master Plan document and Water Rate Study
Deliverables:
▪ Monthly progress reports
▪ Updated schedules
▪ Kickoff and status meeting agenda and minutes
Task W2: Review of Land Use and Previous Master Planning Documents The project will commence with a data review task to understand the status of key resources used in this study.

This task consists of collecting and reviewing relevant data provided by the City or obtained elsewhere for this project. Dudek will review and incorporate information from the City’s prior Water Master Plan and 2020 Urban Water Management Plan to retain historical information. Anticipated data to collect includes the City’s water infrastructure GIS, as-builts and construction drawings, reservoir information, General Plan, Strategic Plan, land use data, and other relevant planning documents and information.

Dudek will compile a data request list for information not provided during the proposal process and present it at the kickoff meeting. In addition, Dudek will prepare and maintain a list of items identified by the City or requested by Dudek indicating the item(s) requested, a person responsible for collecting the information, when it is needed, and when it was provided to Dudek.

Task W3: Water Regulatory and Policy Review
The project team will review federal and state water regulations as well as Chapter 28 of the City’s municipal code. Technical Memorandum No. 3 will include discussion of relevant current and anticipated regulations and their implications on the City’s water production. Emerging contaminants, like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), will also be discussed along with recommendations for additional water quality sampling and treatment.

Assumptions:
▪ The City will make available to the Dudek team all permits related to the operation of the WTP and the distribution system.
▪ Raw and treated water quality will be available for review.

6.e
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 11 Deliverables:
▪ Technical Memorandum No. 3 – Water Regulatory and Policy Review Task W4: Water Treatment Plant Condition Assessment
Dudek will conduct visual assessments of major assets of the WTP to review their condition, integrity, and compliance with current code requirements. Field investigation and condition assessment of the WTP will be based on major WTP assets with major assets grouped together per treatment plant process. Major components of the electrical systems, including Service Entrance Section (SES), switchboards, panelboards, Automatic Transfer Switches (ATS), standby generators will be reviewed. Control system major components, including, Programmable Logic Control (PLC) local control panels, pump control panels, and telemetry antennas will also be inspected. Field evaluation at the original WTP will be limited to equipment that supports the raw water ponds, raw water lift station, and finished water distribution pump station, as the rest of the original WTP is no longer in service. Dudek will review the condition assessment reports performed on the original WTP and 21 mgd WTP.

Evaluation of the original WTP pump stations, the La Brucherie Booster Pump Station and the 21 mgd WTP will include recommendations for upgrade and replacement of systems and capacities.

Dudek staff will meet with City operations and engineering staff prior to the inspections in a pre-inspection workshop to discuss known issues, improvement histories, and operator preferences. Based on this condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and areas of concern to maintain operations. This condition assessment and evaluation of the WTP will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets. Dudek will develop recommended improvements to improve the service life of major assets at the WTP as well as improvements required to meet future capacity requirements and current state mandates and regulations. Budgetary cost estimates for recommended upgrades, replacements, and expansions will be provided. Each recommendation will be listed in priority order. This data will be used to recommend appropriate upgrades for each facility.

Assumptions:
▪ Dudek will receive City support for access to the three pump stations, original WTP, and 21 mgd WTP facilities, including electrical/telemetry panels, buildings and enclosures, WTP processes, and SCADA.
▪ Dudek will conduct one pre-inspection workshop with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site visits.
▪ Two days of inspection will be required.
▪ A list of major asset with installation dates will be provided by City staff in a consolidated electronic form. Condition assessment of WTP major assets will be determined by visual inspection and operational/repair/rehabilitation history provided by City staff.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum summarizing the findings of the WTP field investigations, documentation of deficiencies, and our recommended improvements and associated cost estimates
Task W5: Water Storage Condition Assessment
We shall participate in a maximum of two site investigations (five reservoirs total at two different sites) to perform structural condition assessments of each reservoir. The assessment work is anticipated to be performed while the reservoirs are in operation. We shall complete field assessment forms, obtain field measurements and photograph structural elements of the reservoirs. Structural condition ratings shall be assigned to each structural

6.e
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 12 element assessed. Structural elements to be assessed include steel shells, baseplate, roof plate, coatings, concrete ringwall foundation, stability, anchorage, equipment/pipe supports, appurtenances, handrailing, platforms/subframing, and equipment anchorage. Additionally, raw water pond assessments will include concrete slope and lining assessments. Investigation methods shall be nondestructive in nature and shall consist primarily of visual observations of the exterior and interior surfaces where possible through access/roof hatches.

Investigations will be limited to the use of tools such as a ball-peen hammer for concrete sounding, a pit depth gauge to determine metallic and concrete cover loss, an ultrasonic thickness gauge, calipers, a tape measure, and similar hand tools. Rebar imaging and/or destructive testing such as concrete coring will not be performed as part of the assessment.

All investigations will be performed in accordance with current California Building Code recommendations for assessment work and will adhere to the suggested assessment approaches and techniques as detailed in the following code and standards documents:
▪ American Concrete Institute (ACI) 201.R-08, “Guide for Conducting a Visual Inspection of Concrete in Service” ▪ ACI 364.1R-19, “Guide for Assessment of Concrete Structures Before Rehabilitation” ▪ ACI 562-19, “Code Requirements for Assessment, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Existing Concrete Structures” ▪ American Petroleum Institute (API) 653, “Tank Inspection, Repair, Alteration, and Reconstruction” ▪ AWWA M42, “Steel Water Storage Tanks”
The site investigations shall be performed over 2 nonconsecutive days to allow adequate time for investigation preparation and compilation of field notes and photographs.

We will provide a technical memorandum that summarizes the findings and recommendations. overall structural condition rating, estimated remaining useful life, and improvement recommendations.

Assumptions:
▪ Confined-space entry requirements, oxygen monitoring, and similar mobilization elements required for assessment of the reservoirs will be provided and facilitated by the City. ▪ A complete seismic analysis of the reservoirs to determine current code compliance is not required.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations Task W6: Water Distribution System Condition Assessment Dudek will use AquaTwin Asset software by Aquanuity to perform risk analysis. AquaTwin Asset is discussed in more detail in the Project Approach section. Dudek will propose a risk model (LOF, COF, ROF) and present the model to the City for confirmation/revision. Once confirmed, Dudek will build the risk model in AquaTwin Asset and run the risk model to determine the overall risk for the pipelines. We will prepare a technical memorandum discussing the method of analyses, the factors used in the scoring, the results of the analysis, and the prioritized recommended projects.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations

6.e
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 13 Task W7: Draft Capital Improvement Program
Based on the results of Tasks W3 through W6, Dudek will develop short-term (10-year) and long-term recommended CIP projects. We will prioritize and schedule CIP projects considering the results of the condition assessment and the risk-based scores. Dudek will propose a prioritization matrix to the City for concurrence and/or revision and modification. Once agreed upon, the matrix will be executed. Grouping projects will be incorporated into project planning. CIP project recommendations will be included for pipelines, reservoirs, treatment plants, pump stations, and electrical equipment.

Dudek will develop planning-level cost estimates for each CIP project recommendation, including design, construction, construction management (N), admin/legal, and other contingencies based on recent project bids, manufacturer quotes, and other data. Future projects will have escalated costs assuming inflation factors. The Master Plan report will include a discussion based on the cost estimates. As available, Dudek will obtain recent project costs from the City’s Finance Department.

Deliverables:
▪ List of prioritized projects with cost estimates in 5-year increments (Microsoft Excel) ▪ Draft and final technical memorandum in electronic format (PDF and Microsoft Excel) Task W8: Water Master Plan Report
Dudek will compile the technical memoranda developed through the progression of work, complete any missing chapters or sections (e.g., Executive Summary and Chapter 1, Introduction), and edit the complete report to produce a single, coherent document for draft submittal to the City. We will provide draft and final submittals summarizing the study and all work tasks, which will be provided to the City for review and comment. City comments on each submittal will be incorporated into the Final Master Plan report for delivery to the City.

Deliverables:
▪ Draft document and associated graphics, submitted in full color, delivered electronically (Microsoft Word and PDF) and in hard copy (four bound copies, one unbound) ▪ Final document and associated graphics and appendices, submitted in full color, delivered electronically (Microsoft Word and PDF) and in hard copy (five bound copies) Optional Task W9: Reservoir Float Investigation
If this optional task is executed, we will perform an interior float investigation of each of the steel reservoirs as part of the site investigations of Task 3. These investigations will be performed using a 2-person inflatable dinghy disinfected following AWWA guidelines prior to entry.

Floating the interior of the reservoirs provides the best opportunity to assess the condition of the roof framing where, typically, corrosion and deterioration are the most severe. Due to the fluctuating water levels and oxygen in the vapor zone, steel reservoir deterioration is typically concentrated above the water line. As part of the float investigation, KS shall assess the condition of the interior surfaces of the roof plate and shell as well as roof framing, columns, connections, hardware and coatings. Brief observation of appurtenances shall also be performed.

Assumptions:
▪ Confined-space entry requirements, oxygen monitoring, and similar mobilization elements required for assessment of the reservoirs will be provided and facilitated by the City. ▪ Float investigation of the Raw Water Ponds is not included in this optional task.

6.e
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 14 Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the findings and recommendations will be included in Task W3.

SEWER MASTER PLAN
Task S1: Data Collection and Field Investigations
The extent of data sources associated with the project will be extensive and will benefit from an organized tracking system. This task consists of collecting and reviewing relevant data provided by the City or obtained elsewhere for this project. Data to be provided will include, but not be limited to, previously completed Master Plans, relevant planning documents, the City’s General Plan, the Urban Water Management Plan, the latest SSMP, land use maps, as-built drawings, the sewer facilities GIS, the previous sewer model, if located, water billing data and the water meter shapefile, major facilities drawings, pump curves, operational and SCADA data, O&M logs, a list of assets/equipment for each facility/site, past improvements plans, facility plans, Developer Engineering Plans, the CCTV inspection database, past flow metering data, wet well level data (if available), maintenance records, other information listed in the RFP, and any other pertinent data. Dudek will compile a data request list for information not provided during the proposal process and present it at the kickoff meeting. In addition, Dudek will prepare and maintain a list of items identified by the City or requested by Dudek indicating the item(s) requested, a person responsible for collecting the information, when it is needed, and when it was provided to Dudek.

In Task S1, Dudek will also coordinate with the City to conduct site visits to specific sewer lift stations and the WWTP. Although Dudek will perform a desktop analysis and assessment/evaluation of all 14 lift stations, Dudek has determined that field investigations are only necessary for select older and critical lift stations. Table 2 identifies which lift stations will include supplemental field investigation to be performed by Dudek’s staff.

Table 2. Summary of Lift Station Site Investigations and Requirements Facility Name
Desktop Analysis,
Evaluation, and
Assessment Required?
Supplemental Site
Investigation Required?
Type of Site
Inspection
Required
Optional
Additional Task
(S12)
Lift Station No. 3 Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Alder Canal/Villa
Avenue
Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Main Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Eastside Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Lift Station No. 1 Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Lift Station No. 2 Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
8th and Wake Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Gios Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
3rd and Ross Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Heil and Dogwood Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection

6.e
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 15 Table 2. Summary of Lift Station Site Investigations and Requirements Facility Name
Desktop Analysis,
Evaluation, and
Assessment Required?
Supplemental Site
Investigation Required?
Type of Site
Inspection
Required
Optional
Additional Task
(S12)
Buena Vista Yes No N/A Wet Well
Inspection
Orange Avenue Yes No Wet Well
Inspection
N/A
Countryside South Yes No Wet Well
Inspection
N/A
4th and Wake* Yes Yes Comprehensive N/A
Notes:

N/A = not applicable.
* 4th and Wake Lift Station was not documented in the 2008 Sewer Master Plan. This lift station is assumed to be included in the lift station assessment.

Table 2 also defines an optional task that Dudek can provide as additional scope at the City’s request. The associated fees for this optional additional site inspection work is reflected in the Optional Task S12 below and in the cost proposal.

To accomplish the planned lift station site investigations, Dudek plans for 3 days of primary site investigation, with an additional 1 day included for as-needed follow up investigation if the Dudek team needs to revisit a site to collect additional information (i.e., if part of a station was inaccessible on the primary investigation day or if staff is not available to complete all of the planned investigations on a primary day). Table 3 summarizes our planned lift station site investigations.

Table 3. Summary of Planned Lift Station and WWTP Site Investigation Days and Durations
Site Investigation Day Facilities Included
Combined Number of On-Site
Hours for Inspection
Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 1
Lift Station No. 3, Main Lift Station, Gios Lift
Station
5 Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 2
Alder Canal/Villa Lift Station, 3rd and Ross Lift
Station, Countryside South Lift Station
4 Lift Stations Primary Site
Visits Day 3
Lift Station No. 1, Orange Avenue Lift Station, 4th
and Wake Lift Station

3.5 Lift Stations Follow-Up Site
Visit Day 4
To be determined following primary site visits 4 (as necessary) WWTP/WTP Primary Site
Visit Day 5
WWTP, WTP 8
Notes: WWTP = Wastewater Treatment Plant; WTP = Water Treatment Plant.

Dudek’s staff will coordinate with City operations staff to perform a field investigation of each lift station utilizing photographs, videos, and voice memos to document visual and sensory observations. Lift station field investigations will include condition assessment of mechanical, structural (all structural elements and buildings),

6.e
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 16 electrical/controls, instrumentation, and telemetry equipment as described in the project RFP, as well as site features, site access, emergency access, emergency capability, safety access, and safety concerns. Major components of the electrical systems will be reviewed, including SES, switchboards, panelboards, ATS, and standby generators. Field evaluation will include age, a condition score based on visual inspection, criticality of equipment, and safety concerns. Lighting concerns will be noted if light levels are severely poor, general light fixture condition, and safety issues. Field evaluation of the control system major components, including, PLC local control panels, pump control panels, and telemetry antennas will identify age, a score based on visual inspection, and safety concerns. Note that field investigation and condition assessment of the WWTP will be based on major WWTP assets with major assets grouped together per treatment plant process. This data will be used to identify deficiencies and develop recommend appropriate upgrades for each facility as described in Task S7.

Dudek staff will meet with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site investigations in a pre-inspection workshop to discuss known issues, improvement histories, and operator preferences. This workshop is anticipated to be 3 hours in duration and is assumed to be held virtually.

Assumptions:
▪ Data is available and provided in a timely manner.
▪ Dudek will receive City support on site for access to lift station and WWTP facilities, including access to electrical/telemetry panels, valve vaults, wet wells, dry wells, and lift station buildings and enclosures, WWTP processes, and SCADA.
▪ Operations staff will be available on site during planned lift station site investigations to draw down the level in the wet well for inspection as necessary. ▪ Dudek will conduct one pre-inspection workshop with City operations and engineering staff prior to the site visits.
▪ Per Table 3, 3 days of inspection will be required with an additional 1 follow-up day as necessary. ▪ Dudek’s team will provide our portable generator, forced air blower, O2/H2S/CO monitor, tripod with recovery winch, harnesses, etc. for confined space entry as necessary. ▪ No heavy traffic control or preparation of traffic control plans will be needed to access the lift station facilities.
▪ On-site hours for site investigations on primary site visit days listed in Table 3 assume no confined space entry is required at any of the lift stations. If it is determined that confined space entry is required, the number of on-site hours is anticipated to increase on the primary site visit days (confined space entry requires more time on site). Dudek will require the use of the follow-up site visit day if any confined space entry is conducted at any of the lift station site investigations. ▪ Shut down of any equipment is not included.
▪ Force main assessment will be based on desktop analysis only due to limitations on physical force main inspection techniques.
▪ Dewatering of existing force mains, piping, tanks, or wet structures is not included. ▪ CCTV inspection or physical scanning of force mains is not included. ▪ No on-site flow monitoring or wet well fill/draw testing at the lift stations will be included as part of the assessment.
▪ Potholing to determine location of existing buried utilities including force mains is not included. ▪ Ring out or megger testing of conductors is not included. ▪ Wiring will not be traced to confirm as-built wiring drawings accuracy.

6.e
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 17 Deliverables:
▪ Data request list
▪ Workshop agenda and minutes
▪ Field investigation field notes, observations, and assessment documentation will be included in the improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum per Task S7.

Task S2: GIS Gap Analyses and Needs Assessment
Per the City’s SSMP, the City’s GIS is missing critical information. Dudek will obtain and review the City’s sewer system GIS to evaluate the data gaps that would need to be filled into order to develop a sewer model that has sufficient accuracy of pipeline inverts, pipe slopes and diameters to produce accurate results. For the purposes of this proposal, a field survey of 100 manholes was assumed to facilitate development of the hydraulic model in Task S5. A technical memorandum will be developed that details the data gaps and a verification plan using field surveying to fill in the gaps. Depending on the level of data gaps, this project may be Phase 1 of a multiphase project to survey the City’s sewer collection system and update the City’s GIS and hydraulic model over time to develop an accurate model of the system.

Deliverables:
▪ Technical memorandum summarizing the data gaps and proposed survey plan to fill in the gaps Task S3: Temporary Flow Monitoring
The City’s 2008 Sewer Master Plan included flow metering at nine locations within the system. Dudek proposes to also monitor at nine locations, including several of the same locations metered in 2008 to evaluate the change in sewer flow in the system over time, to account for both the impacts of conservation as well as growth in the community.

Dudek’s goal when developing the flow monitoring plan is two-fold:

1. Calibration of the Hydraulic Model – Placing several flow meters at the exact locations used in the past
flow metering studies, if available, and a comparison
of average flows will be used to calibrate the sewer
model and assess the system-wide change in flows
over the years.

2. Defect Flow Sensitivity – Defect flow consists of anything other than intended sanitary sewer flow, such as groundwater infiltration, inflow from the surface, or illegal connections from gutters. As a first step toward finding and fixing defect flows within the collection system, using flow meters in conjunction with a significant rain event will provide direction on where problems exist.

Dudek will develop a flow monitoring work plan with the City, prioritizing locations that:
▪ Were monitored as part of the 2008 Sewer Maser Plan
▪ Are suspected by operations staff to have high rainfall depended inflow and infiltration (RDII) ▪ Have high average flow rates for comparison of overall system growth over the past years ▪ Are fed by areas of consistent land use type (e.g., single-family residential) for use in updating unit flow factors ADS Environmental Services will provide flow
monitoring and will validate the hydraulic
model and any defect flow sensitivity.

6.e
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 18 Wet weather flow monitoring is anticipated to last 6 weeks with the primary goal of capturing a wet weather event.

Dudek will prepare a flow metering work plan for the monitoring program. A flow metering summary report will be prepared by ADS Environmental Services (ADS) that evaluates typical dry and wet weather diurnal patterns for weekdays and weekends. In addition, RDII will be included for estimating peak wet weather factors.

Assumptions:
▪ The fee estimate includes nine flow meters and one rain gauge for 6 weeks in winter 2024/2025.

Deliverables:
▪ Flow monitoring work plan by Dudek and ADS flow monitoring summary report with RDII analysis if rainfall event is captured
▪ Meeting agenda and minutes
Task S4: Establish Sewer Flow Criteria
Dudek will use the flow metering data, land use data, water billing data to evaluate sewer generation factors for the City. Diurnal flow patterns and sewer peaking factors will be developed using the flow metering data from Task S3 as well as WWTP influent flow data and historical rainfall data. These sewer generation factors along with the General Plan, known planned development data from the Planning Department, and State Housing Element requirements will be used to estimate buildout flow conditions for the City, to be utilized in the capacity analysis in Task S6.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed technical memorandum summarizing the proposed sewer generation factors by land use type, peaking factors, and planning estimate for future sewer flows Task S5: Hydraulic Sewer Model Development and Calibration Using the survey plan developed in Task S2, Dudek will coordinate with NV5 for surveying of 100 manholes. Invert, ground surface, pipeline diameter, and flow routing data will be used to update the City’s sewer collection system GIS, which will be in turn used to build the City’s hydraulic model.

Unless an agency has dedicated modeling staff in-house that intend to perform hydraulic modeling regularly, Dudek does not recommend an agency purchase hydraulic modeling software. Modeling software purchases tend to be a financial loss for such agencies. A more cost-efficient strategy is to utilize a consultant’s software. Dudek proposes using Aquanuity’s AquaTwin Sewer hydraulic modeling software to develop the City’s new sewer model.

AquaTwin Sewer is a GIS Pro-based software package that utilizes the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) 5 engine to evaluate open channel flow hydraulics. Dudek will use the City’s existing sewer GIS, WWTP flows, lift station on/off settings and water billing data from Task S1, manhole surveying data from Task S2, flow metering data from Task S3, and diurnal patterns and peaking factors from Task S4 to develop and calibrate the sewer model. Sewer loading will be allocated in the system using georeferenced water billing data. The existing dry weather flow condition in the model will be calibrated to within 10% of measured data. The dry weather flow model will be peaked to develop an Existing Peak Wet Weather Flow model for capacity analysis.

Assumptions:
▪ Water billing data is available with georeferenced water meter shapefile. ▪ The survey plan will include 100 manholes for surveying performed by NV5.

6.e
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 19 Deliverables:
▪ Updated GIS with survey inverts included
▪ Technical memorandum documenting the model development and calibration process and results Task S6: Hydraulic Sewer Model Analysis
The collection system capacity will be evaluated under existing and projected buildout conditions utilizing the calibrated model from Task S5 and the planning criteria from Task S4. Extended-period simulations will be used to evaluate the full range of flow conditions. Resulting peak wet weather flows, depth over diameter (d/D) values, and velocities will be compared to City criteria. Modeling results will be used to identify pipelines not meeting planning criteria, those with capacity constraints under dry and wet weather conditions, and areas of potentially high RDII. Results will be presented tabularly and graphically. Subsequent model runs will be used to recommend system improvements in the form of pipeline upsizing. The model will include user-defined fields documenting deficiencies and recommended upsizing projects for existing and projected buildout conditions.

Assumptions:
▪ Existing and buildout wet weather flow analyses will be performed. If insufficient data are available to estimate a wet weather peaking factor for the system, the capacity analysis will be performed on peak dry weather flows.

Deliverables:
▪ Sewer modeling files
▪ GIS files extracted from the sewer model
▪ Detailed technical memorandum for City review outlining the results of the modeling and a list of recommended pipeline upsizing projects to address existing and buildout capacity deficiencies Task S7: Sewer Lift Station, Force Main, and WWTP Condition Assessment and Resiliency Analyses
Dudek will review the field investigation information, photos, videos, and observations from the lift stations site investigations. Dudek’s lift stations and force mains desktop analysis will include a hydraulic analysis, a capacity evaluation, an emergency capability evaluation, a reliability evaluation, and an evaluation for feasibility of lift station elimination for all lift stations. Dudek’s lift station desktop analysis will also analyze historical issues, current operational concerns, City preferences, operational nuances, and emergency capabilities at each lift station. Dudek will use this information, the data/information collected and reviewed in Task S1 for the desktop analysis, and the information provided from operations staff during the pre-inspection workshop to perform a condition assessment, evaluation, and resiliency analysis and analyze adequacy in case of emergency or failure for all 14 lift stations. This will be a comprehensive condition assessment that will document deficiencies of site features, as well as all mechanical, structural, electrical/controls, and telemetry equipment. Deficiencies for emergency capability, storage, maintenance/emergency access, safety, and odor control will also be documented for each lift station.

This condition assessment and evaluation of the lift stations will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets at each of the lift stations. Based on the condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and develop recommended improvements (and in some cases recommended alternative improvements) to extend the useful life of the lift stations, provide resiliency upgrades, and recommend upgrades to ensure each lift station meets capacity requirements under current and buildout scenarios.

The WWTP condition assessment will be a more generalized structural, life span, and process assessment per process for major assets/facilities. Dudek will review the field investigation information, photos, videos, and

6.e
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 20 observations from the WWTP site investigation. Dudek’s lift station desktop analysis will also analyze historical issues, current operational concerns, City preferences, and operational nuances at the WWTP. Based on this condition assessment and analysis, Dudek will document deficiencies and areas of concern to maintain operations. Dudek will also identify growth or modifications required to address/filter for new potential state mandates and regulations, etc. This condition assessment and evaluation of the WWTP will include condition- and criticality-based asset scoring for all major assets grouped by WWTP process. Dudek will develop recommended improvements (and in some cases recommended alternative improvements) to improve the service life of major assets at the WWTP as well as improvements required to meet future capacity requirements and current state mandates and regulations.

The developed asset scoring will be used as a tool to help prioritize the recommended improvements for all lift stations and the WWTP for incorporation into the overall CIP. Budgetary cost estimates for recommended upgrades, replacements, and expansions will be provided. Each recommendation will be listed in priority order.

Task S7 includes QC review by NV5.

Assumptions:
▪ Force main assessment will be based on desktop analysis only due to limitations on physical force main inspection techniques.
▪ Force main dewatering and lift station shut down is not included. ▪ Field investigation notes will be summarized and included as an appendix to the technical memorandum.
▪ Asset scoring will be performed for major facility assets; smaller items such as pipe supports will be generally grouped together and provided a single assessment score. No asset database will be prepared for asset scoring. Asset scoring breakdowns per lift station will be organized into a spreadsheet table and attached as an appendix to the technical memorandum. ▪ Hydraulic evaluation/analysis of lift stations will be based on historical flow data (if available) for each lift station in combination with any information provided by operations staff. ▪ No on-site flow monitoring or wet well fill/draw testing at the lift stations will be included as part of the assessment.
▪ A list of major asset with installation dates will be provided by City staff in a consolidated electronic form. Condition assessment of WWTP major assets will be determined by visual inspection and operational/repair/rehabilitation history provided by City staff.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum summarizing the findings of the lift station and WWTP field investigations, documentation of deficiencies, and our recommended improvements and associated cost estimates Task S8: Update of Sanitary Sewer System Master Plan Report Dudek always aims to develop a Master Plan report that is highly useful to multiple departments in an agency, including engineering, planning, operations, and finance. To succeed, the resulting deliverables must be clear and easy to read and enable quick retrieval of information. In addition to being functional, the reports must do the following:
▪ Provide a thorough system inventory of the collection system pipelines and facilities ▪ Contain clear explanations of design and evaluation criteria based on industry standards and the region’s unique characteristics

6.e
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 21 ▪ Provide sufficient detail on the master planning process to give the reader an understanding and ability to replicate and/or update the process when the time arises ▪ Identify areas within the service areas with a substandard condition, performance, or capacity and present those tabularly and graphically
▪ Identify projects that improve performance and/or increase efficiency to improve system reliability and meet regulatory requirements
▪ Succinctly summarize the findings, results, and prioritized recommendations of the Master Plan (from Task S9) for easy implementation
Dudek will compile the technical memorandums developed through the progression of work, complete any missing chapters or sections (e.g., Executive Summary and Chapters 1, Introduction), and edit the complete report to produce a single coherent document for draft submittal to the City. Dudek will submit the draft report to the City for review and comment. Dudek will prepare the Final Sewer Master Plan Update documents addressing the City’s comments on the Draft Sewer Master Plan submittal.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one virtual draft Master Plan review meeting to discuss City comments. ▪ Dudek will address a single, consolidated set of comments for the Draft Sewer Master Plan Update report submittal.

Deliverables:
▪ Draft and Final Sewer Master Plan Update reports in PDF and Microsoft Word formats ▪ Three hard copies of the Final Master Plan Report
▪ Review meeting agenda and minutes
▪ Sewer hydraulic modeling files, Existing and Buildout Master Plan of Sewer exhibits (three hard copies of each)
Task S9: Capital Improvement Program
Using the results of Tasks S6 (Capacity Analysis), S7 (Lift Station and Force Main Condition Assessment) and S10 (Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment), Dudek will develop short-term (10-year) and long-term recommended CIP projects to address the deficiencies identified. The development of the CIP will be based on the available condition assessment information and the useful life and value of the existing sewer collection system assets. We will establish asset values and recommend maintenance and aging infrastructure’s year-to-year replacement/rehabilitation cost. Findings and recommendations from the 2008 Sewer Master Plan will be evaluated and incorporated into the recommendations for this project, if still viable.

Dudek will prioritize and schedule CIP projects considering the results of Tasks S6, S7, and S10, the severity of the deficiency, the criticality of the facility to system operations, potential I&I reduction from rehab, cost of facility failure, and other factors. Dudek will propose a prioritization matrix to the City for concurrence and/or revision and modification. Once agreed upon, the matrix will be executed. Grouping projects will be incorporated into project planning. CIP project recommendations will be included for gravity sewer pipelines, siphons, manholes, lift stations, and force mains.

Dudek will develop planning-level cost estimates for each CIP project recommendation, including design, construction, CM, admin/legal, and other contingencies based on recent project bids, manufacturer quotes, and other data. Future projects will have escalated costs assuming inflation factors. The Master Plan report will

6.e
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 22 include a discussion based on the cost estimates. As available, Dudek will obtain recent project costs from the City’s Finance Department. Task S9 includes QC review by NV5.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one virtual CIP review meeting to discuss the results. ▪ Dudek will generate unit costs and factors for estimating construction and project-level soft costs.

Deliverables:
▪ Tabular cost estimates for each CIP project recommended will be placed in the draft and final sewer master plan reports.
▪ Review meeting agenda and minutes
Task S10: Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment
Consideration of condition, assessment of needs, and rehabilitation of facilities are critical to ensure continued reliability and economic feasibility of maintaining the City’s collection system assets as well as to comply with the Reissued WDR. Given Dudek’s support of the City’s most recent SSMP Audit and Update, we understand that there is not a significant amount of CCTV inspection data at this time, though we know the City is currently underway in expanding these efforts. Dudek proposes this task toward the later portion of the project to give the City time to collect these data. This task will support the continuation of the City’s efforts by incorporating identified deficiencies into the proposed CIP and identifying new weaknesses in larger diameter pipelines (12 inches and larger), particularly those pipelines with the highest identified risk and those in the vicinity of capacity improvements identified as part of Task S6.

Dudek will utilize the inspection reports primarily to evaluate pipeline conditions. We anticipate videos will be reviewed in the case of potential pipeline replacement project recommendations. Dudek will review the existing CCTV inspection reports for each pipeline reach; document defects, laterals, sags, debris, roots, grease, offset joints, cracks, or other noted problems; and identify infrastructure at risk of failure due to condition.

The steps associated with the condition assessment are shown graphically in Figure 5 below.

Figure 5. Condition Assessment Flow

6.e
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 23 The specific rehabilitation method selected will be
determined on a reach-by-reach basis and coordinated with the capacity improvement recommendations to minimize
expensive and intrusive open cut construction. Dudek is highly experienced in evaluating defects and looks to
balance the benefits of rehabilitation versus cost and
useful life of the host pipeline. Full-length pipeline
rehabilitation may not necessarily be recommended in all cases. For example, where the pipeline’s structural integrity has been compromised due to collapse or other failure,
point repairs of single pipe segments or connections at manholes may be the only rehabilitation means necessary.

Depending on the nature, quantity, and severity of defects observed during the condition assessment review,
methods of trenchless rehabilitation or repair to be
considered include the following: specialty and heavy
cleaning; in-situ point repair such as Weko Seal, Link-Pipe mechanical seal, or LMK Performance short liner; open
trench point repairs such as short- or long-segment pipe replacement; in-situ lining with cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liner cured with hot water or steam; complete open cut removal and replacement; and total replacement using a trenchless method such as pipe bursting.

Assumptions:
▪ The fee estimate includes 100 pipeline segments for this task. ▪ A manhole condition assessment will not be performed. ▪ CCTV inspection reports are readily available.

Deliverables:
▪ Tabular representation of recommendations and graphical map of project locations included in master plan report.

Task S11: Sewer Master Plan Project Management
Effective project management is key to the successful completion of any project. Dudek has a proven record of delivering projects on time and within budget. Please refer to the “Project Management Approach” section for our detailed project management and quality control approach.

Assumptions:
▪ There will be one in-person project kickoff meeting at City offices (both Water & Sewer). ▪ There will be 32 virtual bimonthly project status meetings for the Sewer Master Plan. ▪ There will be four virtual City staff meetings.
▪ There will be two in-person City Council presentations for the Sewer Master Plan document and Sewer Rate Study.

Deliverables:
▪ Monthly progress reports
▪ Updated schedules
▪ Kickoff and status meeting agenda and minutes
Dudek completed a sewer rehabilitation program
for the City of South Pasadena. CIPP was used to
repair the sewer pipelines, reducing the impact to
local residents and businesses.

6.e
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 24 Optional Task S12: Supplemental Wet Well Evaluations
Per Task S1 and Table 2 above, this optional task includes site investigation time for five (5) additional wet well inspections.

Deliverables:
▪ Field investigation field notes, observations, and assessment documentation will be included in the improvement recommendations and prioritization technical memorandum per Task S7.

Optional Task S13: WWTP and Select Lift Station Structural Review by Kelsey Based on observations during the site visit by Dudek, it is recommended the City consider a more thorough structural evaluation of the structures within the WWTP and select lift stations by a structural engineer. This would include approximately 18 structures at the WWTP and nine (9) of the lift station wet well videos. Findings would be summarized in a single technical memorandum and included in the Sewer CIP.

WATER AND SEWER COST OF SERVICE RATE AND CAPACITY FEE STUDY The scope of work provided below is based on the City’s RFP and our experience completing successful water and sewer cost-of-service and capacity fee studies for utilities in California and throughout the United States.

Task 1: Project Initiation and Management
Task 1.1 Initial Data Request and Data Review
Immediately upon receiving the notice to proceed, Raftelis will submit a comprehensive data request to the City seeking information such as that listed below. To the extent possible, we will review the information provided prior to the project kickoff meeting.
▪ Customer billing data (Microsoft Excel)
▪ Current and proposed revenue and expenditure budgets (Microsoft Excel) ▪ CIP projections based on the Water and Sewer Master Plans and the City’s long-term CIP plans (Microsoft Excel)
▪ WTP and WWTP production data (Microsoft Excel)
▪ 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (PDF)
Task 1.2 Project Management
Raftelis will provide timely identification of project issues/challenges as they arise during the project and ongoing model quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) by the project manager and technical advisor/quality reviewer.

Assumes the kick-off meeting will be held in person.

Deliverables:
▪ Pre-kickoff meeting data request

6.e
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 25 Task 2: Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics and Demand Forecasting (Water and Sewer)
Task 2.1 Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics The analysis of customer water consumption characteristics is critical for the development of the demand forecast that underlies the water and sewer financial plans, the allocation of costs to customer classes, and the development of rate structure alternatives. After obtaining the City’s actual historical customer billing data for the period FY 2021–FY 2023, Raftelis will seek to analyze the following types of information for each major customer type/land use:
▪ Account growth by meter size
▪ Monthly, seasonal, and annual consumption
▪ Average day, maximum day, and maximum hour consumption ▪ Winter average consumption as a proxy for indoor consumption ▪ Estimates of indoor and outdoor consumption on a per account and gallons per capita day (gpcd) basis ▪ The correlation between water consumption and single-family residential gross lot sizes and irrigable areas ▪ Historical consumption declines during drought stage emergencies Task 2.2 Demand Forecasting
Raftelis will prepare comprehensive demand forecasts for the water and sewer utilities for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034. It will be developed using Microsoft Excel to allow for scenario modeling.

Deliverables:
▪ Detailed understanding of customer water consumption characteristics ▪ Comprehensive forecast of billed water and sewer demand for the 10-year period FY 2025– FY 2034
▪ Comprehensive estimate of billed sewer discharges for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034 Task 3: Financial Planning and Revenue Requirement Forecasting (Water and Sewer) Task 3.1 Raftelis Approach to the Financial Planning Process Utility financial planning is an iterative process in which the “optimal” capital financing strategy must be identified.

This requires achieving the correct balance between CIP financing provided by rate revenues, capacity fees, grants, and external debt financing. A comprehensive and correctly developed financial plan must be based on a realistic projection of customer water and sewer demand under normalized climate conditions and reasonable assumptions of customer account growth. The Microsoft Excel financial planning models developed by Raftelis will allow City staff to vary inputs for items such as customer account growth, average billed water consumption per account, average contributed sewer flow per account, CIP expenditures and financing strategies, operating expenses, inflation rates, etc.

Figure 6 illustrates the financial planning process that will be used by Raftelis for each of the City’s utility services.

6.e
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 26 Figure 6. Financial Planning Process
Task 3.2 Review and Evaluation of City Financial Policies Raftelis will review and, as appropriate, make recommendations regarding the City’s financial policies. These policies will include items such as the minimum and maximum cash reserve targets, the use of external debt financing for repair and replacement versus growth-related CIP projects, and the appropriate target debt service coverage ratios for senior and subordinated debt.

Task 3.3 Comprehensive Cash Flow Projection and Revenue Requirement Forecasting The City seeks the development of a financial plan for the 5-year period CY 2025–2029. The financial plan developed by Raftelis will be for the 10-year period CY 2025–2034. This will allow the City to assess its financial position in Years 6–10 of the projection period considering potential long-term changes in customer water consumption characteristics, water supply costs, regulatory requirements, etc. The comprehensive cash flow projection will include the following:
▪ Revenue Under Existing Rates: A projection of rate revenues generated under existing rates based on the updated demand forecast completed in Task 2; the projection will include billed water consumption across all tiers, customer types, and meter sizes
▪ O&M Expenses: O&M expenses including inflation adjustments and potential changes in the profile of outyear O&M caused by system technological changes ▪ Potential Pass-Through Costs: The identification of ongoing costs that are not under City control and thus potentially appropriate for recovery via a “pass-through” adjustment (e.g., water supply costs and electric power)
▪ Debt Service: Existing and projected debt service expenditures used for CIP funding, pension obligation funding, etc.
▪ CIP Expenditures: All CIP expenditures, regardless of funding source, developed as part of the water and sewer master planning process and the City’s long-term CIP plan

6.e
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 27 Task 3.4 Scenario Analysis – Financial Plan Optimization Financial Planning Criteria Specified in the City’s RFP: The City’s RFP specifies that the water and sewer financial plans must meet the following minimum criteria while ensuring full funding for regulatory compliance costs, repair and replacement of existing infrastructure, and timely financing for all identified capital improvement needs:
▪ Debt coverage revenue requirements per City’s bond covenants (net operating revenue including capacity fees must be 1.25 times debt service, and without capacity fees must be 1.00 times debt service) ▪ Maintain a minimum reserve of 2 months operating cash ▪ Maintain the water utility’s current “A” credit rating ▪ Maintain rate stabilization reserves to deal with potential temporary revenue reductions from reduced water consumption due to drought, conservation, or the economy Scenario Analysis: This involves the analysis of required rate increase under different utility sales for each service, CIP expenditure, and debt service alternatives. It includes the modeling of projected cash reserve and debt service coverage for each year of the planning horizon. As instructed in the City’s RFP, a minimum of three financial planning scenarios will be developed.
▪ “Do Nothing” Scenario: Comprehensive financial plans that assume no rate increases over the 10-year financial planning horizon
▪ “More of the Same” Scenario: Comprehensive financial plans that assume annual rate revenue increases if the City was to replicate its previously approved historical rate increases over the 10-year planning horizon
▪ Optimal Capital Financing Scenario: Development of an “optimal” capital financing strategy that balances the projected mix of rate revenues, capacity fees, grants, and external debt funding to fund capital improvements
▪ Drought Risk Assessment: Assessment of the risk of water sales revenue shortfalls due to short- and longterm drought events Task 3.5 Revenue Requirement Projection
Based on the optimal financial planning scenario developed in Task 3.4, Raftelis will project total system revenue requirement from rates for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034 for water and sewer utility services.

Deliverables:
▪ Development of the optimal financial planning scenario in consultation with City staff ▪ Water and sewer financial plans and revenue requirement projections for the 10-year period FY 2025–FY 2034
▪ Potential recommendations for changes in financial policies Task 4: Cost-of-Service Analysis (Water and Sewer)
Task 4.1 Raftelis Approach to the Cost-of-Service Process The procedures used by Raftelis in water and sewer cost-of-service studies are based on industry standard methods presented in the AWWA publication, Manual of Water Supply Practices M1, Principles of Water, Rates, Fees, and Charges (AWWA Manual M1) and the Water Environment Federation publication, Manual of Practice No. 27, Financing and Charges for Wastewater Systems (WEF Manual 27). The use of industry-standard procedures

6.e
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 28 corresponds to the cost-of-service mandate contained in California Proposition 218. Figure 7 illustrates the multistep cost allocation process used by Raftelis for a water cost-of-service study.

Figure 7. Water Cost-of-Service Process
Figure 8 illustrates the multistep cost allocation process used by Raftelis for a sewer cost-of-service study.

Figure 8. Sewer Cost-of-Service Process
Task 4.2 Water and Sewer Cost-of-Service Analysis
▪ Test-Year Revenue Requirement: Determination of the test year revenue requirement based on the Task 3 financial planning process.
▪ Cost Functionalization: Determination of the net book value or replacement cost of existing utility infrastructure to the correct functional categories to allocate annual capital costs. Assignment of test-year capital costs (PAYGO financing and projected debt service), O&M expenses, and non-rate revenue offsets to the correct functional categories.
▪ Allocation to Cost Causation Components: Allocation of test-year capital costs, O&M expenses, and nonrate revenue offsets to the correct cost causation components. For a water utility, common cost causation components are water supply, base demand, maximum day demand, maximum hour demand, billing, and Step 1
Revenue Requirement
from Financial Plan
Operation and
Maintenance Expense
Debt Service
Capital Costs
Transfers
Step 2
Functionalize
Costs
Source of Supply
Treatment
Storage & Distribution
Meters and Billing
Step 3
Allocate Functions
to Demand
Characteristics
Base
Max Day
Max Hour
Metering
Fire Protection
Step 4
Distribute Costs to
Customer Classes
Residential
Multifamily
Commercial / Industrial
Irrigation
Step 1
Revenue Requirement
from Financial Plan
Operation and
Maintenance Expense
Debt Service
Capital Costs
Transfers
Step 2
Functionalize
Costs
Collection/Conveyance
Lift Stations/Pumping
Treatment
Biosolid Handling
Step 3
Allocate Functions
to Demand
Characteristics
Flow
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand
Suspended Solids
Customer Service
Step 4
Distribute Costs to
Customer Classes
Residential
Multifamily
Commercial
Industrial

6.e
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 29 customer service. Common sewer utility cost causation components include flow, biochemical oxygen demand, and suspended solids.
▪ Customer Class Units of Service: Determination of the customer class units of service. For a water utility, units of service often include customer class average day demands, peak demands, number of bills, and number of 3/4-inch or 1-inch meter equivalents. For a sewer utility, units of service include volume of flows and pounds of biochemical oxygen demand and pounds of suspended solids. ▪ Customer Class Cost-of-Service: Distribution of the allocated test-year capital costs, O&M expenses, and non-rate revenue offsets to customer classes based on each of their proportionate share of demands, bills, and equivalent meters.

Deliverables:
▪ Water service customer class cost-of-service
▪ Sewer service customer class cost-of-service
Task 5: Rate Structure Design and Proposed Rates
Task 5.1 Current Water and Sewer Rates
As shown in Table 4, the City currently charges a $/thousand gallon volumetric rate for billed water consumption and fixed monthly charges based on meter size.

Table 4. Current Rates
Water Usage Charge (per 1,000 gallons)
All Consumption $3.75
Monthly Service Charge ($/meter size)
5/8 inch and 3/4 inch $3.56
1 inch $4.33
2 inch $6.03
3 inch $19.20
4 inch $22.23
6 inch $32.71
8 inch $44.68
A monthly flat sewer rate is paid by single-family residential and duplex customers (1 and 2 below), and a volumetric rate of $/thousand gallons is paid by all other customers (3 through 22 below). The current sewer rates are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Current Sewer Rates
# Land Use Rate Rate Structure / Billing
Residential
1 Single Family $58.79 Monthly Flat Rate
2 Duplex $87.97 Monthly Flat Rate

6.e
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 30 Table 5. Current Sewer Rates
# Land Use Rate Rate Structure / Billing
3 Multiple Family, Condominium $4.05 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 4 Mobile Home Park $4.05 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons Commercial and Other
5 Hotel, Motel, without dining facilities $5.32 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 6 Laundromat $4.23 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
7 Commercial Laundry, Dry Cleaner $6.99 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 8 Market w/ Garbage Disposal, Butcher Shop, Mortuary $12.82 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 9 Professional Office $3.91 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 10 Repair Shop, Service Station $5.51 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 11 Bar, Tavern $5.13 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
12 Car Wash $3.65 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
13 Soft Water Service $2.94 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 14 Hospital, Convalescent Facility, Medical Office $4.81 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 15 Hotel, Motel with Dining Facilities $9.62 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 16 Restaurant, Bakery $12.12 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 17 School, College, Church $4.04 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons 18 Retail Store $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
19 Beauty Parlor $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
20 Ice-making $1.50 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
21 Movie Theatre $4.49 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
22 Packing Shed $1.50 Volumetric Rate $/1,000 gallons
Task 5.2 Development of Proposed Rates and Rate Structure Alternatives After the completion of the cost-of-service analyses described in Task 4, Raftelis will work with the City staff to develop potential alternative water and sewer rate structures. Our proposed consulting fee assumes we will evaluate a maximum of two alternative water rate structures and two alternative sewer rate structures. In addition, we will evaluate the potential for the implementation of a water budget-based rate structure as discussed in the Evaluation of Water Budget Rate–Based Rate Structure section below.

6.e
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 31 The alternative rate structures recommended by Raftelis will produce adequate revenues to maintain water and sewer utility financial sufficiency over short-, medium-, and long-term planning horizons. When considering potential alternative rate designs, Raftelis will perform the following analysis:
▪ City Rate Structure Objectives: Evaluation of the effectiveness of the current water and sewer rate structures in achieving the City’s pricing and policy objectives ▪ Fixed vs. Volumetric Revenue Recovery: Impact of potential alternative rates on water and sewer fund revenue stability/volatility
▪ Customer Class Definitions: Appropriateness of the current water and sewer rate structures considering the customer class definitions identified in the water and sewer cost-of-service processes (Task 4) ▪ Proposition 218 Compliance: Ability of potential alternative rate structures to fully comply with Proposition 218 and other applicable California regulatory requirements ▪ Customer Bill Impacts: Impact of potential alternative rate structures on customer bills (monthly and annual) across a broad range of demand (i.e., very low consumption to very high consumption customers) ▪ Ease of Customer Understanding: Ability of customers to easily understand potential alternative rate structures and the ability of the City to administer such alternatives Task 5.3 Evaluation of Water Budget Rate–Based Rate Structure Our proposed consulting fee includes the evaluation of the potential implementation of a water budget–based rate structure for the City’s water customers. Our analysis will include:
▪ Billing System Capabilities: An assessment of the City’s customer information system to successfully bill customers under a water budget rate structure.
▪ GIS Data Availability: A review of the GIS data the City maintains regarding residential and landscape irrigation customer gross lot size and irrigable area.
▪ Definition of Essential Use, Efficient Use, and Inefficient Use: The allocation of customer water usage into specific categories. For example, essential indoor usage may be declined by the 47-gallon per capita per day requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 1157. Efficient use pay be defined as a level of outdoor irrigation consumption based on the reference evapotranspiration rate and the evapotranspiration rate adjustment factor
▪ Determination of Water Budget Tier Thresholds: This is the level of water consumption associated with each water budget tier. An example appears below in Table 6.

Table 6. Example Tier Structure
Tier 1 0 – 100% Essential Allocation
Tier 2 100% Efficient Allocation
Tier 3 101 – 130% Above Efficient Allocation
Tier 4 131 – 160% Above Efficient Allocation
Tier 5 161% and Above Efficient Allocation
▪ Estimate of Water Budget Rates and Customer Bill Impacts: Based on our work in Task 2 (Analysis of Customer Water Consumption Characteristics) and Task 4 (Cost-of-Service Analysis), we will develop preliminary proposed rates for each water budget tier and estimated single-family residential bill impacts.

6.e
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 32 Task 5.4 Overarching Awareness of Proposition 218 Requirements From the initial kickoff meeting through the development of proposed rates, we stay focused on the need to comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 218. Throughout the financial planning, cost allocation, and rate design process we will work with City staff and legal counsel to help achieve this objective. While we strive to comply with the intent and requirements of Proposition 218, it is important to note the Raftelis shall have no obligation to indemnify the City or any Indemnitee against liability for claims by a third party for failure to comply with its obligations under Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).

Task 5.5 Awareness of California Regulatory Requirement and Litigation Raftelis is not a law firm, but we do closely follow litigation that may have bearing on the water rate structures implemented by our clients. For example, the California Court of Appeals is currently considering two cases related to the validity of tiered rate structures. Similarly, AB 1157, which become law in 2022, requires that indoor water use be a maximum of 47 gpcd in 2025 declining to 42 gpcd in 2030. Another example is the recently enacted AB 755, which requires utilities to quantify the cost of serving the top 10% of water users. Our awareness of litigation and changing regulatory requirements enhances our ability to serve the City.

Task 5.6 City Water Code Chapter 3.8 Water Usage Demand Analysis(AB 755) Raftelis will prepare a water usage demand analysis as required by Chapter 3.8 of the Water Code, commencing with Water Code Section 390, to identify the cost of water service to the highest water users (as defined) and the average annual volume of water delivered to such high users. This information shall be included in and posted in the cost of service analysis.

Task 5.7 Comprehensive Bill Impact Calculations
Raftelis will calculate comprehensive bill impacts for the City’s existing and proposed water and sewer rates.

Bill impacts will be calculated for multiple customer land use types and across a wide distribution of monthly and annual consumption volumes. This will ensure that City staff is fully informed about potential customer bill ramifications.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposed 5-year water and sewer rates for the period FY 2025–FY 2029 ▪ Consideration of alternative rate structures for water and sewer service ▪ Evaluation of a water budget-based rate structure
▪ Comprehensive customer bill impacts
Task 6: Capacity Fee Study (Water and Sewer)
Task 6.1 Current Capacity Fees
The City’s current capacity fees are assessed on an Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) basis. The City’s current capacity fees are shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Current Capacity Fees
Water $6,149 per ERU
Sewer $7,174 per ERU

6.e
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 33 Task 6.2 Project Initiation and Regulatory Compliance
To initiate the water and sewer capacity fee studies, we will consult with City staff to understand how capacity fees are currently assessed and what costs they recover. Based on the understanding gained from this discussion we will develop a proposed approach and provide the City with a comprehensive data request. We will then review all relevant documentation, including the water and sewer engineering Master Plans, the City’s Urban Water Management Plan, and the City’s rules/regulations for capacity fees.

The capacity fees we develop will be based on industry practices and in full compliance with California legal standards as contained in California Government Code Sections 66000–66025. This will include compliance with the requirements of California’s Mitigation Fee Act and general legal principles related to impact fees. Under California law, “fees,” as opposed to “taxes,” can be adopted without the two-thirds vote of the public as required by Proposition 13. The State of California Mitigation Fee Act, also known as AB 1600 and codified in Sections 66000–66025 of the California Government Code, establishes a requirement for “nexus” in the establishment of a development fee. The nexus requirements are that (1) a development fee is directly related to the impacts of the development and (2) the fee is roughly proportional to the impacts of the project.

Task 6.3 Update of Equivalent Residential Unit Relationships Raftelis will update the ERU factors for each land use type as contained in City Resolution 07-100. This analysis will require an analysis of customer water consumption characteristics by highly defined land use types as contained in Resolution 07-100.

Task 6.4 Selection of an Infrastructure Valuation Methodology Raftelis will work with City staff to choose the appropriate methodology to be used in the City’s water capacity fee study. There are three industry-standard methods for the calculation of capacity fees:
▪ Buy-In Approach: Appropriate for utilities with existing available infrastructure capacity to meet projected demand
▪ Incremental Approach: Appropriate for utilities with existing infrastructure capacity constraints that must construct significant new infrastructure to meet projected demand ▪ Hybrid Approach: Appropriate for utilities with some available existing infrastructure capacity but also a need to construct new infrastructure to meet projected demand Task 6.5 Valuation of Water and Sewer Infrastructure
Informed by the chosen calculation methodology, Raftelis will develop a water capacity fee model that reflects either, or both, of the following:
▪ Existing Infrastructure: An infrastructure valuation for each major existing functional component of the water and sewer systems. For existing assets, the valuation will be based on “replacement cost less deprecation” (RCLD). The replacement cost will be developed using the construction cost inflation factors published in the Engineering News-Record (ENR CCI). The value of growth-related infrastructure will be based on present value as expressed in current year 2024 or 2025 dollars. If the City’s fixed asset subsidiary ledger does not contain an adequate level of information to develop a replacement cost estimate using these construction cost inflation factors (for example, inadequate information on the function performed by major assets), then an alternative valuation method will be selected in consultation with City staff.
▪ Planned Infrastructure Expansion: The present value of projected water and sewer growth-related infrastructure expenditures contained in the City’s current capital improvement plans.

6.e
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 34 As part of the infrastructure valuation process, outstanding debt principal used to finance existing system water infrastructure will be subtracted from the RCLD valuation. Accumulated cash reserves will be added to the RCLD valuation.

Task 6.6 Determination of Customer ERU Demand and Projected ERU Growth For the Buy-In Method, Raftelis will estimate the number of ERU currently served by the City’s existing water and sewer system. For the Incremental Method, Raftelis will project the number of future ERUs that can be served by planned growth-related infrastructure additions. This estimate will be based on residential customer household density and gpcd water usage. As part of this process, Raftelis will analyze billing data for existing customers, consult your current Urban Water Management Plan, and the most recent engineering Master Plan.

Task 6.7 Calculation of the Water and Sewer Capacity Fees Based on the work completed for the calculation methodology and customer demand analysis, Raftelis will calculate the following:
▪ The baseline water capacity fee expressed on a $/ERU basis (e.g., for a 3/4-inch equivalent connection) ▪ A baseline sewer capacity on a $/ERU basis
Task 6.8 10-Year Capacity Fee Fund Financial Plans
Based on the work completed in Tasks 6.1–6.7, Raftelis will prepare a 10-year projection of water and sewer Capacity Fee Fund revenues (sources of funds), expenditures (uses of funds), and beginning and ending cash balances. The purpose of this projection will be to determine the adequacy of projected capacity fee revenues as compared to projected growth-related capital improvement expenditures. It is important to note two things about this type of projection:
▪ Projections of this type are highly speculative because they assume an annual level of new connections (i.e., new development) that may not materialize as planned. ▪ Even if the new connections materialize as projected, the level of revenue generated by connection fees may be significantly less than actual level of planned growth-related capital expenditures.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposed water and sewer capacity fees
Task 7: Cost-of-Service Rate Study Reports
Our approach to the report development process is to work collaboratively with the City’s legal counsel to ensure compliance with state law. Our approach includes:
▪ Creation of a Detailed Administrative Record: Raftelis prepares comprehensive rate study reports that fully document the assumptions, inputs, and analytical procedures used to develop proposed rates. Our reports provide clients with a detailed administrative record that can be referenced if rates are questioned or challenged in litigation.
▪ Collaboration with Legal Counsel: Maintaining a close partnership with City legal counsel throughout the rate study process is a priority. As complex, and potentially controversial, cost allocation or rate design cost recovery issues arise during the rate study process, we will request review and input from the City’s legal counsel.
▪ Review and Comment by the City: Raftelis welcomes the comprehensive review and comment of preliminary/draft reports by City staff, City legal counsel, and the City Board.

6.e
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 35 Deliverables:
▪ Draft cost-of-service rate study reports for review by City Staff and City Council ▪ Final cost-of-service rate study report
Task 8: Proposition 218 Notice and Hearings
The Raftelis Strategic Communications staff will prepare rate adjustment notices for mailing within the required 45-day notice period prior to holding the public hearing. While requirements of Proposition 218 notifications are easy to satisfy, many utilities miss the opportunity to strategically educate and inform ratepayers. Raftelis has designed countless Proposition 218 notifications that go beyond the minimum dictated by statute to deliver visually appealing pieces that customers want to read. The notices will outline the proposed rate changes, explain the right to challenge the rates, and will meet and comply with all notice requirements. Once these arrive in mailboxes, City customers will not only be properly notified, but will understand the City’s need and be more likely to support rate adjustments. Raftelis will deliver final press-ready documents for the City to print and mail notices to all parcel owners and customers of record.

Our proposed consulting fee includes two in-person presentations to City Council for the Proposition 218 process.

The first presentation will be a public meeting during which City Council authorizes the issuance of a Proposition 218 notice. The second presentation will be at the formal Proposition 218 hearing. All presentation material prepared by Raftelis will be provided to the City Leadership team for review prior to the City Council meetings.

Deliverables:
▪ Proposition 218 notice preparation
▪ Onsite attendance at two (2) Proposition 218 related City Council meetings

6.e
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 36 Schedule
The City requested that the rate study be completed by July 2025. However, the Sewer Master Plan scope also includes wet weather flow monitoring and inflow and infiltration analysis. In order to complete those items it will be necessary to conduct flow monitoring during the rainy season, which is December to March. The flow monitoring delays the completion of the Sewer Master Plan and will not allow enough time to complete the Sewer CIP and the Rate Study by the requested deadline. Our proposed schedule, shown in Figure 9 on the following page, includes wet weather flow monitoring and has the approval of the rate study at the end of 2025 with rate implementation in early 2026.

There are other options to complete the rate study by July 2025. Some potential options include, but are not limited to, 1) Removing the wet weather flow monitoring or 2) Separating the water and sewer rate studies and completing the water rate study by the deadline.

6.e
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 37 Figure 9. Proposed Project Schedule

6.e
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 38 Project Management Approach
Every project involving a multifaceted team benefits from strong, consistent leadership and proactive communication. Our project manager serves as a single point of contact, assuring quality deliverables and budget and schedule monitoring and reporting. In addition, Dudek offers the City dynamic and diligent project managers in Elizabeth Caliva, PE, and Greg Ripperger, PE, and with an experienced project team to support them. Our management approach to your projects emphasizes the following key elements:
▪ Senior technical oversight and daily administrative management ▪ Continuous and clear communication
▪ Schedule and cost monitoring and reporting
▪ Quality assurance/quality control
▪ Virtual collaboration and technology
▪ Peer-to-peer collaboration
▪ Technical Oversight and Administrative Management
Dudek focuses on regular communication and coordination with our clients and sub-consultants. We hold regular face-to-face meetings or teleconferences and prepare agendas, minutes, and notes to ensure a clear understanding of critical issues, allowing work to proceed in a unified manner. Our check-in meetings allocate resources per client schedules and constraints. Dudek identifies areas where information sharing reduces the schedule, budget, or effort needed to produce quality deliverables.

COST AND SCHEDULE CONTROL
Dudek uses a variety of computerized project management systems to assure cost and schedule control. We use regular team meetings to maintain communication, monitor cost, and schedule performance. In addition, Dudek includes required City invoice information to facilitate smooth processing and approval. Dudek will work with the City staff to further customize invoicing.

CONTINUOUS AND CLEAR COMMUNICATION
Effective project managers facilitate information, data, instruction, and guidance communication. We expend resources efficiently, preventing wasteful rework. We achieve effective communication by:
▪ Holding regular project meetings to coordinate work effort, monitor task completion, and review budget performance
▪ Updating project information, schedule, and progress reports, so staff are aware of information affecting their work products and schedule
▪ Meeting with City staff at milestones and other strategic junctures ▪ Documenting issues, action items, and critical decisions

6.e
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 39

VIRTUAL COLLABORATION AND TECHNOLOGY
Dudek uses several tools and technologies for efficient, productive virtual collaboration, including:
▪ File Sharing/Storage via ShareFile, allowing Dudek to store, share, exchange, and track information by providing a centralized location for documents and data ▪ Document Co-Authoring simultaneously through SharePoint via Client Portal ▪ Client Portals is custom-built for access via www.dudek.com, set up according to client specifications ▪ Mobile Data Collection, allowing field data capture solutions for efficient analysis ▪ Virtual Meetings via Zoom Meeting or Other Platform to conduct real-time online meetings ▪ GIS-based mapping, research, and alternatives evaluation ▪ Drones to document site conditions and assist with field data collection

COORDINATION WITH SUBCONSULTANTS
Effective subconsultant coordination is critical to the success of this and other multidisciplinary engineering projects. Our subconsultants depend on us for information to provide their services efficiently and accurately.

Occasionally, subconsultants can receive direction or necessary data late for an upcoming deliverable, negatively impacting the project schedule and quality. Therefore, the Dudek philosophy is to coordinate with our subconsultants early and often.

QA/QC PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The project manager prepares our QA/QC approach in collaboration with the Quality Control Team before the kickoff meeting. Key elements of our QA/QC approach include:
▪ Defined quality responsibilities of the project manager, principal in charge, project engineers, and quality control reviewers ▪ Detailed deliverables list with scheduled submittal dates and reviews ▪ Defined quality control review process/documentation requirements ▪ Complete sub-consultant submittal review/validation procedures Our independent quality control reviewers perform quality reviews of deliverables before submitting them, working closely with Ms. Caliva to execute Dudek’s proven QC review protocol (at right). Quality control measures related to cost estimating include identifying high-quality sources of past contract bidding values and validating their application to the subject project. Dudek is committed to training project managers in proven project management and control methods. Our Quality Management approach focuses on continually improving quality by identifying and correcting problems, so they do not reoccur. Team members habitually check in with peers or senior engineers for every critical decision, creating a continuous quality control check that reduces the potential for rework. In addition, we view subconsultants as an extension of our staff. As such, we review their work under our QA/QC program for interdisciplinary coordination and require that they conduct independent technical reviews of all deliverables.

PM hands off draft
deliverable to QC Reviewer
QC Reviewer returns
signed and dated
comments in PDF format
Project Team addresses
comments to indicate
completed comments and
those requiring follow-up
Deliverable submitted to
client after comments
resolved with QC Reviewer
Quality Control Protocol

6.e
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 40

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.e
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 41 Proposed Staffing Plan
Our proposed team works together on similar master planning projects throughout southern California. Elizabeth Caliva, PE, will serve as Project Manager with Greg Ripperger, PE, serving as Deputy Project Manager, both overseeing the development and execution of the projects, tracking the budget and schedule, and serving as the main points of contact for the City’s project manager. Ms. Caliva has 19 years of experience in master planning and is an expert in hydraulic modeling and analysis. For over 15 years, Mr. Ripperger has specialized in the management of master planning, water/wastewater system design, construction management, and hydraulic modeling.

Both understand the importance of honest communication, being solution-oriented, and efficient multitasking.

Russ Bergholz, PE, PMP, will support Ms. Caliva and Mr. Ripperger as Principal in Charge and will provide Quality Control leadership. Mr.

Bergholz leads Dudek’s Water Infrastructure Group and brings 29 years’ experience in planning and engineering design. Elizabet, Greg and Russ will facilitate the flow of information and deliverables amongst the team and with the City’s project manager.

The Dudek team includes a concise array of professionals who built their careers designing, permitting, managing, maintaining, and constructing water, wastewater, and recycled water facilities. The team members provide the indispensable expertise in master planning and GIS analysis essential to deliver effective and efficient services to the City.

Raftelis, Inc. (Raftelis) is a Registered Municipal Advisor and will assist Dudek by providing rate study and financial analysis services. Raftelis has conducted thousands of rate studies across the US and hundreds in California.

Recent engagements in southern California include the San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, the Long Beach Water Department, the cities of Lakewood, Orange, Chino, Redlands, Pomona, El Monte, Industry, Santa Fe Springs, and Yorba Linda, and the El Toro Water District. While financial planning and rate setting constitute most of Raftelis’ engagements, what sets them apart is that they offer stakeholder communications, organizational assessment, and other strategic planning and technology support for local government.

KEY PERSONNEL AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
We understand the City is considering the Dudek team in its entirety; therefore, key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the project, acknowledging that no person designated as key to the contract shall be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City. All team members are committed to the extent of the project.

Figure 10 on the following page outlines proposed lines of communication for this contract, followed by brief biographies for key personnel. Focused resumes for all staff are provided in Appendix A.

DUDEK BENEFITS TO THE CITY
▪ Proven partnerships and
ability to perform
▪ Knowledge and
understanding of the
surrounding areas
▪ Strong master
planning experience
▪ Unique ability to find
practical, cost-effective
solutions to planning
challenges

6.e
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 42 Figure 10. Dudek Team Organization
Proposed Lines of Communication
The most effective project manager facilitates the continuous flow of information, data, instructions, and guidance between the City and Dudek team members. When maintaining this flow, we utilize resources efficiently and minimize wasteful rework. We achieve constant communication through the following:
▪ Regularly calling or emailing the City’s key contact staff person to discuss project milestones, activities, and potential issues
▪ Holding regular project management meetings with key project staff to coordinate work efforts, monitor task completion, and review budget conformance
▪ Updating, as necessary, the project description, schedule, work progress reports, and inventories of available data so that all team members are aware of information that may affect their work products and schedules
▪ Meeting with City staff at design milestones and other strategic junctures ▪ Diligent documentation of issues, action items, and decisions

6.e
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 43 Elizabeth Caliva, PE

PROJECT MANAGER AND SEWER LEAD
Elizabeth Caliva is a professional engineer with over 19 years’ experience specializing in water, wastewater, and recycled water planning projects. Ms. Caliva has extensive master planning and hydraulic modeling experience and is proficient in several modeling software packages, including InfoWater, InfoSewer, and InfoSWMM by Innovyze. In addition to planning studies and Master Plan projects, her background includes SSMPs and SSMP audits, treatment plant design, pump station design and sewer pipeline design.

Education
MS, Water Resources and
Water Quality Engineering
BS, Environmental
Engineering
Certifications
PE, CA No. 64331
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ 2023 SSMP Update and Audit | CITY OF El CENTRO
▪ Sewer Master Plan Update | CITY OF FULLERTON
▪ Sewer Master Plan and GIS Update | CITY OF CHINO
▪ Citywide Wastewater System Master Plan | CITY OF REDLANDS ▪ Sewer Master Plan and Condition Assessment | CITY OF PASADENA Greg Ripperger, PE

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER AND WATER LEAD
Greg Ripperger is a senior project manager with 15 years’ professional experience as a water engineer specializing in master planning, water system design, construction management, and hydraulic modeling.

Mr. Ripperger has worked as a project manager for Civiltec Engineering and a project engineer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Mr.

Ripperger collaborates with clients to quickly understand and solve their water/wastewater issues throughout various projects. He thrives in managing complex projects with unique solutions.

Education
BS, Civil Engineering
Cum Laude, Honors
Certifications
Professional Engineer (PE),
CA No. 79499;
AZ No. 67991
Water Audit Validator,
American Water Works
Association
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ Water System and CIP Master Plan | SANTA FE IRRIGATION DISTRICT ▪ Riverside Facilities Master Plan | WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ▪ Water Master Plan and Rate Study | CITY OF COVINA
▪ Water Master Plan Update | CITY OF BREA
▪ Water Master Plan | SAN ANTONIO WATER COMPANY, UPLAND

6.e
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 44 Russ Bergholz, PE, PMP

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE AND QA/QC
Russ Bergholz is a principal engineer with 29 years’ experience.

Mr. Bergholz leads Dudek’s Water Infrastructure Group and manages engineering water-/recycled water system Master Plans and design projects. His experience includes developing numerous water and recycled water projects, sewer Master Plans, pipeline design projects (including trenchless technology), and infrastructure rehabilitation projects throughout Southern California.

Education
BS, Civil Engineering
Certifications
CA PE No. 59395
Project Management Institute
PMP No. 1472209
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ Riverside Facilities Master Plan | WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ▪ Citywide Wastewater System Master Plan | CITY OF REDLANDS ▪ Water and Sewer Master Plans | CITY OF CARLSBAD
▪ Water System Master Plan Development | INDIO WATER AUTHORITY ▪ Stormwater and Sewer Master Plans | CITY OF SAN MARINO Table 8. Key Personnel Qualifications and Experience
Name/Roll/Education and
Certifications
Experience Summary and
Benefits to the Team Project Experience
Shannon Brown, PE, QSD
Risk Analysis/GIS
MS, Environmental Engineering
BS, Environmental and
Resource Science
PE, CA No. 92771
Qualified Stormwater Developer
(QSD)
Shannon Brown has 13 years’ experience
specializing in stormwater and water
regulatory permit compliance, hydrology
and hydraulics modeling, and geospatial
analysis. He has a background in state and
federal environmental compliance,
including environmental impact
documentation, special studies, and field
data collection.
▪ City of El Centro, Water Quality
Monitoring Plan City of Chino,
Sewer Master Plan
▪ City of Redlands, Sewer Master
Plan
▪ City of Fullerton, Sewer Master
Plan
▪ City of Temecula, Citywide
Drainage Master Plan
Joe Schneider, PE, EE
Electrical/I&C
BSE, Electrical Engineering
MBA, Project Management
Registered Electrical Engineer,
CA 19636
Joe Schneider is a principal electrical
engineer with 25 years’ professional
experience as an electrical,
instrumentation, and controls engineer and
17 years’ experience specializing in
instrumentation and control system design
and electrical distribution system design for
water treatment, wastewater treatment,
water distribution facilities, and wastewater
collection facilities.
▪ Deer Valley Water Treatment
Plant Rehabilitation, City of
Phoenix
▪ Jomax Water Reclamation
Facility Phase 2B Expansion,
Peoria, Arizona
▪ Vistancia Community Facilities
District Zone 7/8/9 Reservoir
Pump Station, Peoria, Arizona

6.e
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 45 Table 8. Key Personnel Qualifications and Experience
Name/Roll/Education and
Certifications
Experience Summary and
Benefits to the Team Project Experience
Greg Guillen, PhD, PE
Process Treatment/
Regulatory Lead
PhD, Civil Engineering
MS, Civil Engineering
BS, Environmental Engineering
Gregory Guillen is a chemical and
environmental engineer with 15 years’
experience focusing on water and
wastewater treatment. Dr. Guillen’s
education covered the fundamentals of
chemical and environmental engineering,
with an emphasis on water and wastewater
treatment. His graduate work focused on
advanced membrane materials and
processes for separations, including those
found in water and wastewater treatment.
▪ Water System and Capital
Improvement Program Master
Plan, Santa Fe Irrigation District
▪ Urban Water Management Plan
Update, Ramona MWD
▪ Wastewater Treatment and
Collection System Master Plan,
Crestline Sanitation District
▪ Well Rehabilitation Master
Plans, Goleta Water District
Zoey Wang, PE
Hydraulic Modeling
and Analysis
M.S., Civil and Environmental
Engineering
B.S., Hydrology and Water
Resources Engineering
PE, CA No. C87599
Zoey Wang is a senior engineer with 8
years’ professional experience specializing
in water, wastewater, and recycled water
master planning. Ms. Wang has extensive
hydraulic modeling experience and is
proficient in several modeling software
packages, the most used being InfoWater
Pro by Innovyze and AquaTwin Sewer by
Aquanuity.
▪ Riverside Facilities Master Plan,
Western Municipal Water
District
▪ Water Master Plan and Rate
Study, City of Signal Hill
▪ Ramona Municipal Water
District, Sewer Model
Development and Calibration
▪ City of Compton, Sewer Master
Plan Update
Amanda Combs, PE
Condition Assessment
MS, Environmental
Engineering
BS, Civil/Environmental
Engineering
PE, CA No. 67287
Amanda Combs has 21 years of experience
leading water and wastewater projects. She
provides condition assessment, identifies
rehabilitation needs, quantifies specific
repair methods, groups improvement by
region, and, most importantly, prioritizes
recommended improvements to address
the most critical issues first.
▪ City of Pasadena, Sewer Master
Plan Update
▪ City of Encinitas, Citywide Sewer
Replacement and Repair
▪ City of South Pasadena, State
Revolving Loan Fund Assistance
(to rehabilitate and replace the
city's aging sewer collection
system)
▪ City of South Pasadena, Sewer
Rehabilitation and Replacement
Program, Phase 1 and Phase 2
Brandon Lacap, PE
Condition Assessment
BS, Civil Engineering
PE, CA No. 87211
Brandon Lacap has 14 years’ of experience
managing lift station condition assessment,
prioritization, and design projects.

Experience includes hydraulic analysis,
CoFA, sewer conveyance modeling, field
inspection, preparation of comprehensive
condition assessment and prioritization
reports, and designing of lift station
rehabilitation and replacement projects of
all types and sizes.
▪ Condition Assessment and
Prioritization of 5 Sewer Lift
Stations, Elsinore Valley MWD
▪ Wastewater Master Plan Update
(Condition Assessment of 14
Sewer Lift Stations), Olivenhain
MWD District
Moonlight Beach SPS Pump
Replacement Evaluation, San
Elijo Joint Powers Authority

6.e
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 46 Table 8. Key Personnel Qualifications and Experience
Name/Roll/Education and
Certifications
Experience Summary and
Benefits to the Team Project Experience
Justin Scheidel, PE
Condition Assessment
MS, Civil Engineering
BS, Civil Engineering
PE, CA No. 82058
Justin Scheidel is a project manager with 17
years’ experience specializing in water
infrastructure design, wastewater treatment
design, and construction management. Mr.

Scheidel is responsible for detailed design
and layout, civil/mechanical calculations
and analysis, equipment selection, cost
estimation, and development of plans and
specifications. He is experienced in all
phases of engineering, including planning,
design, and construction.
▪ Lift Station Condition
Assessment (5 sewer lift
stations), Elsinore Valley
Municipal Water District
▪ Reservoir Condition Assessment
(7 potable and 1 non-potable
storage reservoir), Elsinore
Valley Municipal Water District
▪ Pipeline Alignment Evaluation to
Abandon Lift Stations, City of
Carlsbad
John Wright, CPA
Raftelis
Water and Sewer Rate Studies
and Financial Analysis
MS, Finance
BS, Accounting
Certified Public Accountant, CO
No. 11959
Series 50 Municipal Advisor
Representative
John Wright has over 25 years of utility
industry financial management and
economic analysis experience – 14 years as
a utility consultant with Raftelis and 7 years
as a utility staff member with Denver Water
(CO) and the City of Portland Bureau of
Environmental Services (OR). Mr. Wright’s
expertise includes water, recycled water,
and wastewater cost-of-service, financial
planning, and capacity fee studies.
▪ Water and Wastewater Rate
Study, San Francisco Public
Utilities Commission
▪ Comprehensive Cost-of-Services
and Rate Structure Update, San
Bernardino Municipal Water
Department
▪ Water and Wastewater Cost-ofService Studies, City of San Diego
Paul Mitchell, PE
ADS Environmental Services
Flow Monitoring
MS, Civil, Environmental and
Chemical Engineering
BS, Civil, Environmental and
Chemical Engineering
PE, CA No. 049435
Mr. Mitchell has 28 years of experience
emphasizing wastewater collection systems
and municipal waste. His experience
includes long-term flow monitoring services,
model verification, pump stations, critical
sewer segments, I&I analysis and
prioritization studies, sewer system
evaluation, and technical reporting and
presentation.
▪ Sewer Master Plan and GIS
Update, City of Chino
▪ City of Pasadena Sewer Master
Plan Update
▪ Crestline Sanitation District
Wastewater Treatment and
Collection System Master Plan
▪ Encina Wastewater Authority
Flow Monitoring
▪ City of Los Angeles
Comprehensive Flow Monitoring
(saved $498 million and
eliminated capital projects)
Matt Stone, PE, SE
Kelsey Structural
Structural
MS, Structural Engineering
BS, Structural Engineering
PE, CA No. 78488
SE, CA No. 6183
Matt Stone has over 14 years of project
management and structural design work
encompassing commercial, infrastructure,
water, wastewater, and military projects. He
has performed many complex structural
and seismic designs for new and existing
buildings utilizing the latest design
standards and philosophies. He specializes
in the assessment, design and retrofit of
water and wastewater treatment, storage,
and conveyance facilities.
▪ Rice Canyon and Ortega
Reservoirs Rehabilitation,
Elsinore Valley MWD
▪ Ellis Tank Assessment and
Repair, Eastern Municipal Water
District
▪ Reservoir Condition
Assessments, EVMWD
▪ Grossmont Tank Rehabilitation,
Padre Dam MWD

6.e
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 47 Previous Experience
Dudek and Master Planning
Master planning is vital to organized and fiscally responsible water, sewer, and recycled water infrastructure development. Our engineers have 30+ years of experience leveraging GIS-based computerized hydraulic models to replicate existing system performance and simulate growth, allowing our clients to plan strategically for significant infrastructure improvements in their CIP. Our engineers can assist with planning level studies to:
▪ Validate system-wide performance and/or identify existing system deficiencies ▪ Determine future system demands, supply requirements, and flow generation ▪ Test and evaluation alternative analysis
▪ Create a roadmap to implement new improvements sized and scaled for cost-effective ultimate buildout An accurate and calibrated computerized GIS-based hydraulic model is the primary tool in achieving these goals.

Once developed, the hydraulic model provides the ideal tool for evaluation options to address capacity issues, identify means of redundancy, quantify the level of service, simulate fire flow emergencies, assess risk management, and numerous other scenarios.

A properly prepared Master Plan will meet several objectives for maintaining and managing water, wastewater, and recycled water facilities. By utilizing state-of-the-art GIS and hydraulic models, Dudek has completed over 45 similar comprehensive Master Plans that assist agencies with planning appropriately for improvements, meeting regulatory requirements, and enhancing operations for increased reliability and efficiency.

RECENT MASTER PLANNING EFFORTS
With 500+ available southern California staff, Dudek is ready to provide the City with the services required to complete your Master Plans successfully. Table 9 presents examples of our past 5 years of master planning experience. ** indicates complete project description on the following pages.

Table 9. Dudek Master Planning Experience (Past 5 Years) Client Project / Reference Start Complete
City of Alhambra Citywide Sewer System Repair and Lining Thomas Amare, Project Manager,
626.300.1562, [email protected]
10/2018 5/2020
**City of Chino Sewer Master Plan and GIS Update
Natalie Avila, Associate Engineer,
909.334.3406, [email protected]
10/2020 5/2022
City of Compton Sewer Master Plan Update
Kofi Sefa-Boakye, PhD, Public Works Department
310.605.5500, [email protected]
1/2023 Ongoing

6.e
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 48 Table 9. Dudek Master Planning Experience (Past 5 Years) Client Project / Reference Start Complete
City of Encinitas 2019–2020 Citywide Sewer Rehabilitation 2016–2018 Citywide Sewer Rehabilitation
Matt Widelski, Principal Engineer,
760.633.2862, [email protected]
5/2019
6/2016
Ongoing
2022
City of Fullerton Sewer Master Plan Update
Jose Medina, Associate Engineer,
714.738.6863, [email protected]
1/2023 Ongoing
City of Lomita Water Master Plan and Model Update
Rachel Bucklew,
310.325.7110 x155, [email protected]
7/2021 1/2022
City of Oceanside Citywide Recycled Water Conveyance System Project Philip Tunnell, Senior Civil Engineer,
760.435.5848, [email protected]
8/2016 6/2021
**City of Pasadena Sewer System Master Plan Update
Brent Maue, Assistant City Engineer,
626.744.4307, [email protected]
9/2018 3/2020
City of Placentia Sanitary Sewer Management Plan Audit and Update Sewer Master Plan
Luis Estevez, Director of Public Works,
714.993.8120, [email protected]
7/2019
7/2016
4/2020
2/2018
Rainbow Municipal
Water District
Recycled Water Master Plan
Updates to Water and Wastewater Master Plans
Tom Kennedy, General Manager,
760.728.1178 x130, [email protected]
1/2016
2/2015
8/2016
6/2015
**City of Redlands Citywide Wastewater System Master Plan Update Veronica Medina, Project Manager,
909.798.7584 x6, [email protected]
8/2020 4/2022
City of San Marino Wastewater System Condition Assessment and Sewer System Master Plan
Stormwater Master Plan Update
Amber Shah, City Engineer,
626.300.0787, [email protected]
3/2018
7/2019
9/2019
6/2021
** Santa Fe Irrigation
District
Water System and CIP Master Plan
Marissa Potter, 858.756.2424, [email protected]
2/2021 9/2021
City of Signal Hill Water Master Plan and Rate Study
Margarita Beltran,
562.989.7300, [email protected]
12/2023 Ongoing

6.e
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 49 Table 9. Dudek Master Planning Experience (Past 5 Years) Client Project / Reference Start Complete
Temescal Valley Water
District
Water, Sewer and Non-Potable Master Plan Updates
Jeff Pape, General Manager,
951.277.1414, [email protected]
7/2017 3/2023
** Western Municipal
Water District
2023 Riverside Facilities Master Plan Update
(Water, Sewer, Recycled Water)
Derek Kawaii, Director of Engineering,
951.571.7230, [email protected]
11/2021 Ongoing
Raftelis Projects
**City of Covina Water Master Plan and Rate Study
Andy Bullington, Director of Public Works, 626.384.5490 2021
**San Bernardino
Municipal Water
Department
Comprehensive Water and Wastewater Rate Study
Cindy Mouser, Director of Finance,
909.453.6010, [email protected]
Ongoing
Las Virgenes Municipal
Water District
Capacity Fee Study
Donald Patterson, Director of Finance and Administration, 818.251.2133, [email protected]
2023
**City of Ventura Water, Wastewater and Recycled Water Rate Services Gina Dorrington, General Manager, 805.677.4131
2023

DUDEK PROJECTS

WATER SYSTEM AND CIP MASTER PLAN
Client: Santa Fe Irrigation District
Client Reference: Marissa Potter, Engineering Services Manager; 858.414.9120, [email protected]
Project Dates: 2/2021–9/2021
Key Team Members: Greg Ripperger; Russ Bergholz; Elizabeth Caliva; Shannon Brown; Greg Guillen
The district needed an update to its 2009 Asset Management Master Plan (AMMP) and the 2012 Joint Facilities Master Plan (JFMP). Since the completion of these two documents, further studies and evaluations have been performed, such as the 2020 Distribution System Condition Assessment and Operational Evaluation, as well as changing conditions and drivers that needed to be incorporated into an updated CIP. Dudek compiled, reviewed, and evaluated all relevant information to establish a preliminary list of potential projects based on the findings of the prior studies. Dudek updated the district’s existing water model using SCADA data to enhance the model’s ability to evaluate water age, residual management, and other water issues. The updated model was then used for evaluating project alternatives.

Dudek also performed a condition assessment of significant infrastructure. The updated condition assessment, preliminary project list, and hydraulic evaluation were combined to develop recommended projects. Using a

6.e
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 50 scoring matrix, projects were prioritized, and project descriptions, key project components, and accurate cost estimates were developed for the final CIP deliverable. The SFID potable water system includes 13 pressure zones and 150 miles of pipeline.

SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT (WITH RAFTELIS) Client: City of Pasadena
Client Reference: Brent Maue, Assistant City Engineer, 626.744.4307 [email protected] Project Dates: 9/2018–3/2020
Key Team Members: Elizabeth Caliva; Russ Bergholz; Shannon Brown; Amanda Combs; Brandon Lacap; ADS Environmental; Raftelis
The City of Pasadena had last completed a sewer Master Plan more than 10 years prior and experienced a significant change in public works staff over the years. The City needed a full evaluation of the 700-mile sewer collection systems condition, operational issues, capacity analysis and rehabilitant needs. Dudek proposed a comprehensive evaluation of hydraulic capacity through updated flow monitoring and hydraulic modeling, as well as condition assessment and identification of improvements needed for system operation and reliability.

As the City is 99% built out and historically has not experienced significant capacity issues, Dudek proposed to focus efforts on identifying rehabilitation needs, quantifying specific repair methods, grouping improvement by region, and most importantly, applying prioritization of recommended improvements to address the most critical issues first. Taking a system wide perspective and focusing on key improvement areas that mitigate high risk, City staff will have confidence that the collection system will continue to operate and be maintained cost effectively.

Dudek worked with Raftelis to develop a wastewater cost of service and rate study for the City. The Raftelis study included a comprehensive review of the City’s current wastewater rate structure, financial position and cost requirements. The main objectives of the study included adequately recovering costs to maintain fiscal sufficiency for the City’s wastewater utility, gradually building up operating and capital reserves for prudent fiscal management, analyzing alternative rate structures to increase revenue stability, and developing fair and equitable rates for the City’s customers.

SEWER MASTER PLAN, CONDITION ASSESSMENT, AND GIS UPDATE PROJECTS Client: City of Chino
Client Reference: Natalie Avila, Project Manager; 909.364.2770, [email protected]
Project Dates: 10/2020–Ongoing
Key Team Members: Elizabeth Caliva; Russ Bergholz; Shannon Brown; Amanda Combs; Brandon Lacap; Jenny Li; ADS Environmental Dudek recently completed the City of Chino’s Sewer Master Plan and GIS Update. The overall goal was twofold: (1) evaluating existing and future sewer system capacity and existing sewer asset condition for the development of a phased approach for the City’s sewer CIP with capacity and condition-related projects and (2) creating a dynamic GIS database that can be leveraged for multiple operational and project planning purposes, including integration into an asset management system to streamline data collection.

6.e
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 51 The project includes a comprehensive GIS update, sewer flow monitoring using ADS Environmental, manhole survey, condition assessment, developing and calibrating a new InfoSWMM hydraulic model, capacity analysis of existing and future conditions, and developing a 10-year CIP.

CITYWIDE WASTEWATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Client: City of Redlands
Client Reference: Veronica Medina, Project Manager, 909.798.7584 x6; [email protected]
Project Dates: 8/2020–4/2022
Key Team Members: Elizabeth Caliva; Russ Bergholz; Jenny Li Dudek assisted the City of Redlands in an update to their previous 1998 Sewer Master Plan. The City’s wastewater collection system includes 240 miles of sewer and one sewer lift station. Wastewater is treated at a city-owned 9.5 mgd WWTP that utilizes two parallel treatment systems— a 6.0 mgd membrane bioreactor treatment process and a 3.5 mgd conventional process.

This Master Plan update resulted in a new hydraulic model, an updated capacity analysis of the City’s collection system, a process evaluation of the WWTP, and a list of recommended CIP projects for the long-term reliability of the City’s wastewater system.
2020 RIVERSIDE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
Client: Western Municipal Water District
Client Reference: Derek Kawaii, Director of Engineering; 951.571.7230, [email protected]
Project Dates: 11/2021–Ongoing
Key Team Members: Russ Bergholz; Elizabeth Caliva; Greg Ripperger; Shannon Brown; Zoey Wang; Jenny Li
Dudek provided the Western Municipal Water District with its 2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan, including potable water, sewer, and recycled water systems. The goal of the projects was to develop a clear and usable document that addresses the short- and long-term needs associated with the district’s potable water, sewer, and recycled water systems within their Riverside Service Area. Western is currently working with Dudek to further update the report to address additional growth anticipated in the region. The additional updates are anticipated to be completed by end of 2024.

The project includes reviewing and validating the District’s water and recycled water hydraulic models, constructing and calibrating a sewer hydraulic model, and developing short- and long-term CIP for the District’s potable water, recycled water, and wastewater collection systems. The District’s potable water system includes 21 pressure zones, 565 miles of pipeline ranging from 4 to 60 inches in diameter, 12 potable water booster stations, 16 storage reservoirs, and 8 interconnections with other agencies, including 3 primary supply sources. The Riverside service area is only approximately 60% built out; therefore, the focus of the Master Plan has been on identifying necessary improvements to accommodate future growth, water quality, and fire flow. CIP projects from the different systems will be integrated where possible, and growth projections triggered their timing.

6.e
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 52

B-SERIES LIFT STATION CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Client: Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District
Client Reference: Vanessa Hinger PE, Senior Engineer; 951.674.3146, [email protected]
Project Dates: 3/2023–Ongoing
Key Team Members: Brandon Lacap; Justin Scheidel; Kelsey Structural Dudek provided a comprehensive condition assessment of the existing civil, mechanical, structural, and electrical assets for five of the District’s aging sewer lift stations (40 years old) and associated force mains. A record data review, hydraulic analysis, and field inspection were required for each lift station to determine deficiencies and develop recommendations for a prioritized list of capital improvement plan projects to rehabilitate/replace the evaluated stations. Dudek developed and used a condition and criticality/riskbased scoring analysis to prioritize improvement projects for each station. The improvement projects were developed to address the observed safety risks, operational risks (that can lead to sewer spill), equipment failures, and code violations and are anticipated to be carried out over the next 10 years. Planning level cost estimates were developed for each improvement project to provide EVMWD with anticipated CIP project budgets over the next 10 years.

WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Client: Olivenhain Municipal Water District
Client Reference: Kimberly Thorner, General Manager; 760.733.6466; [email protected] Project Dates: 7/2023–Ongoing
Key Team Members: Brandon Lacap; Greg Guillen
Dudek provided the condition assessment and analysis of both of the District’s sewer collection systems: the Rancho Cielo Sewer Collection System and the 4S Ranch Sewer Collection System. These two collection systems combine to approximately 66 miles of gravity mains, 1,215 manholes, 14 sewer lift stations ranging from 60 gpm to 1,700 gpm, and approximately 12 miles of force mains. Dudek managed the comprehensive condition assessment of the District’s three largest lift stations including the hydraulic evaluation and field inspection of all mechanical, structural, electrical, and site/civil assets. The remaining 11 lift stations included a hydraulic evaluation, review of the previous improvement recommendations from the 2015 Sewer Master Plan, and Workshop discussions with operators to develop improvement projects to incorporate into the overall CIP. Dudek prepared a Condition Assessment and Prioritization Technical Memorandum for all of the 14 lift stations which included descriptions of the recommended improvement projects and planning level project costs, which were then prioritized and incorporated into a 10-year CIP budget to be documented in the District’s Wastewater Master Plan Update Report.

In addition to the sewer collection system condition assessment, Dudek provided 1) a process evaluation for the District’s 2-mgd 4S Ranch Water Reclamation Facility (WRF), 2) an electrical infrastructure evaluation, 3) an evaluation of the WRF’s operation and maintenance procedures, and 4) a risk-based prioritization of capital improvement projects. Findings and recommendations from these evaluations helped inform the creation and budgeting for the District’s updated 10-year CIP. The risk-based approach to prioritizing capital projects allows the District to rationally and proactively minimize risk while improving WRF infrastructure and operations.

6.e
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 53 CONCEPT-LEVEL FACILITY AND PROCESS REVIEW FOR THE 3A WWTP Client: Moulton Niguel Water District
Client Reference: David Larson, Engineering Manager, 949.425.3525, [email protected] Project Dates: 1/2020–8/2020
Key Team Members: Greg Guillen
The District assumed operation of 3A WWTP from Santa Margarita Water District and requested Dudek to prepare a concept-level facility and process review report for the plant to define the current and future capacity and process capabilities for the facility. Scope of work includes the review and consolidation of previous reports and studies, review and comments on the waste discharge requirements, and treatment process evaluation and facility constraints analysis.

RAFTELIS PROJECTS

WATER MASTER PLAN AND RATE STUDY
Client: City of Covina
Reference: Andy Bullington, Director of Public Works; 626.384.5490 Completion Date: 2/2021
In 2020, Raftelis and their teaming partner, Civiltec Engineering, Inc. (Greg Ripperger, Dudek), were retained to complete a Water Master Plan and Rate Study, which included a full asset condition assessment, system analysis, water model update, and water rate study. A detailed capital improvement plan was compiled based on analyses performed, evaluation of operational issues, and condition assessment results. This included prioritized projects, cost estimates, and individual project descriptions for the capital improvement plan. The capital improvement plan was input into the financial model and utilized in the rate study. For the rate study, Raftelis reviewed revenue requirements, the City’s user classifications and usage patterns, cost of service analyses, and developed connection fees and rate design for water rates. The studies included presentations to City management staff, a City Council workshop, and a public City Council meeting. The final Master Plan and rate study were completed in December 2020 and rates were adopted in February 2021.

COMPREHENSIVE WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY
Client: San Bernardino Municipal Water Department
Reference: Cindy Mouser, Director of Finance; 909.453.6010; [email protected] Completion Date: Ongoing
The San Bernardino Municipal Water Department has a water service area encompasses approximately 45- square miles of the City’s 62 square miles and serves water to roughly 200,000 people throughout both the City of San Bernardino and the unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. John Wright was the project manager for a comprehensive water and wastewater rate study for the City of San Bernardino (Department). The study included the development of 10-year financial plans, cost-of-service studies using industry-standard principles, and the development of wholly revised water and wastewater rate structures that were implemented by the Department’s Board of Water Commissioners. In addition, Raftelis also developed drought surcharges for the Department. The outcome of the study was the development of Proposition 218-compliant water and wastewater rates for the period FY 2022–FY 2026. The Department provides wholesale wastewater service to the City of Loma Linda and the East Valley Water District. In 2022, the East Valley Water District began using its own Water

6.e
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 54 Reclamation Facility and will no longer be a wholesale wastewater customer of the Department. As part of the rate study, Raftelis has assisted the Department’s plan for this significant loss of revenue.

WATER, WASTERWATER, AND RECYCLED WATER RATE SERVICES
Client: City of Ventura
Reference: Gina Dorrington, General Manager; 805.677.4131 Completion Date: Ongoing
The City of Ventura (City) is under a federal Consent Decree order that requires the City to change the process and point of discharge for wastewater effluent currently discharged to the local estuary. The improvements necessary, when coupled with a required advanced WTP, are estimated at more than $280 million.

The most recent 5-year rate study was conducted throughout 2020 and 2021. The goal of the study was to develop a 10-year financial plan to sustainably fund the City’s capital program, including the $280 million indirect potable reuse (IPR) project, as well as to revise the water and wastewater rate structures to incentivize conservation, maximize affordability for essential water use, and maintain revenue stability. The study included a comprehensive review of the City’s revenue requirements and allocation methodology, a review of the City’s user classifications, water demand patterns, cost of service analyses for three utility services, and rate design for City users. Through a collaborative process, buy-in was achieved for a recommendation providing five years of rates, revised rate structures, and reasonable cost allocations between the City’s utility enterprise funds. The recommended rates were implemented in July 2021.

6.e
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 55 Agreement Exclusions
Dudek respectfully requests the City’s consideration of the following contractual exceptions.

2.7, City’s Right to Terminate for Default: we request to add a section after 2.7 to state “Consultant Right to Terminate for Default. In the event the City materially defaults in the performance of any of its duties or obligations hereunder, which default is not substantially cured within ten (10) calendar days after notice is given to the City specifying the default, then the Consultant may, upon giving notice thereof to the City, immediately terminate this Agreement for cause.”

6.1B, Duty to Defend: we request to add the following to the end of the paragraph: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any professional liability claim or lawsuit, this indemnity does not include providing the primary defense of City, provided, however, Consultant shall be responsible for City’s defense costs to the extent such costs are incurred as a result of Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.”

6.e
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 56

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.e
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 57 Modified Scope of Work
Water Master Plan Modifications:

1. We have proposed to use Aquanuity’s AquaTwin Asset software instead of Fracta.

2. Addendum 1, Question #16 and #18 discusses building a water model. We have not included any model construction or analysis in the proposal. The City’s GIS will be used with AquaTwin Asset to complete the condition assessment for the water distribution system.

Sewer Master Plan Modifications:

1. Consistent with Addendum 1, Question #5, Dudek is not recommending the City purchase the sewer modeling software; therefore, we also removed the training for City staff on running the model. Dudek has found that for most agencies, contracting modeling services with consultants is typically the most cost effective.

2. To the Sewer Master Plan scope of work, Dudek added two tasks including Task S10, Sewer Pipeline Condition Assessment and Task S11,G Sewer Master Plan Project Management (Task S11). Task S10 assumes the City will have sufficient CCTV performed for Dudek to have at least 100 pipeline segments to include in the task. We thought for the purposes of SSMP compliance, this would be very helpful for the City to demonstrate the work noted in the SSMP audit and update is, in fact, being performed.

6.e
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 58

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.e
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 59 Lawsuit History
To the best of our knowledge, a 10-year summary of Dudek’s legal claims and/or litigation involving Professional Consulting Services is provided in Table 10.

Table 10. Summary of Legal Claims in Last 10 Years
Client/Project Summary of Legal Claims and/or Litigation Native American Tribe
Settlement
In July 2015, Dudek entered into a confidential settlement agreement with a Native American tribe. Dudek had provided an environmental assessment and related consulting services to the client. At the conclusion of the project the client expressed dissatisfaction and in order to resolve the matter in an expeditious manner, Dudek agreed to pay the client $75,000 without any admission of liability. Notably, this client has continued to do business with Dudek subsequent to this settlement.

Terra Lago Community
Association v. Indo Land
Ventures, LLC, et al.

On November 12, 2015, Terra Lago Community Association sued Indio Land Ventures for alleged construction defects arising out of the construction of a residential development complex located in Indio, California. Dudek was named as one of many cross-defendants for its role in preparing the lake-liner design; the other parties were involved in various construction aspects of the lake. Dudek did not participate in any supervision or other construction management activities. Plaintiff initially demanded $25,275 to settle the claims against Dudek, and their claims ultimately resolved in full for $10,000. The parties executed a settlement and release agreement which the Court approved and the case was dismissed in 2019.

City of Carlsbad vs.

Ledcor Construction Inc.

On June 13, 2016, the City of Carlsbad filed a civil complaint in California Superior Court, County of San Diego, against Ledcor Construction Inc. Dudek was named as a codefendant. The project architect, RRM Design Group, was also later named as a defendant. The suit was related to construction of the City’s First Responder Training Center. Dudek served as construction manager for the City on the project. Dudek denied any liability in the matter. The matter has been resolved between the City and Dudek and was dismissed in August 2019.

Elsinore Valley Municipal
Water District v. Water
Works Engineers, LLC,
et al.

On November 12, 2021, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (the “District”) filed a civil complaint against Water Works Engineers, LLC (WWE) in California Superior Court, County of Riverside, for alleged design defects in a water reclamation facility. The District filed a first amended complaint against WWE on September 26, 2022, for breach of contract and professional negligence. WWE subsequently cross-claimed against the construction firm as well as Dudek (and other firms) for its role as construction manager. Dudek was not involved in the design of the project, denies any liability, and intends to defend itself vigorously.

6.e
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 60

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.e
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 61 Insurance

6.e
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Water and Sewer Master Plans and Cost of Service Rates Study 62

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

6.e
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) Appendix A
Resumes

6.e
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study)

6.e
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Elizabeth Caliva, PE

PROJECT MANAGER
Elizabeth Caliva (uh-LIH-zuh-beth cuh-LEE-vuh) is a professional engineer with 19 years’ experience specializing in water, wastewater, and recycled water planning projects. Ms. Caliva has extensive hydraulic modeling experience and is proficient in several modeling sofware packages, the most commonly used being InfoWater, InfoSewer, and InfoSWMM by Innovyze and Aquanuity’s AquaTwin Sewer and AquaTwin Asset. In addition to planning studies and master plan projects, her background includes Sanitary Sewer Management Plans (SSMPs) and SSMP audits, treatment plant design, pump station design, sewer pipe line design, urban stormwater compliance, and federal environmental cleanup.

Project Experience
Sewer Master Plan Update, City of Fullerton, California. Project Manager. In 2023, Dudek contracted with the City of Fullerton to complete their 2023 Sewer Master Plan Update. The City is approximately 75% built out; therefore, both capacity evaluation and condition assessment are essential for their system, as well as to comply with the Reissued SSSWDR. The City’s sewer collection system consists of more than 330 miles of gravity pipeline and 36 sewer siphons. There are no lift stations in the City’s system as the collection system discharges to the OC San trunk system for final conveyance and treatment. Flow monitoring was performed in winter 2023, consisting of 30 flow meters for 6 weeks. The City’s InfoSWMM model was updated and calibration is currently underway. Once calibration is complete, Dudek will evaluate capacity, perform condition assessment and develop a 5- and 20-year CIP for the City to achieve the goal of the project, which is to provide the City with a comprehensive report to confirm the current state of the sewer collection system and provide a clear road map as development continues across the City.

Sewer Master Plan and GIS Update, City of Chino, California. Project Manager. Dudek is in the process of updating the City of Chino’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan and providing a comprehensive geographic information system (GIS) update. The City’s sewer collection system consists of more than 220 miles of gravity pipeline; 4,200 manholes; one sewer lift station (with one more currently in construction); and approximately 2,500 feet of sewer force main. With anticipated growth projected at over 20% by 2035, the City is in a unique position among more built-out cities in the region: It needs to focus heavily on both condition assessment of aging sewer system assets and capacity analysis to accommodate for future growth. Included in the study is hydraulic model development, flow monitoring, and manhole surveys. Dudek will be evaluating existing and future sewer system capacity and condition assessment for development of a phase capital improvement program (CIP). Additionally, Dudek’s GIS department will be creating a dynamic GIS database to be leveraged for multiple operational and project-planning purposes, including integration into an asset management system.

Citywide Wastewater System Master Plan, City of Redlands, California. Project Manager. Dudek is supporting the City of Redlands in an update to its 1998 Sewer Master Plan. The City’s wastewater collection system includes 240 miles of sewer pipeline and one sewer lift station. Wastewater is treated at a City-owned 9.5 million gallons per day (mgd) wastewater treatment plant that utilizes two parallel treatment systems: a 6.0 mgd membrane bioreactor treatment process and a 3.5 mgd conventional process. This master plan update will result in a new Education
University of California,
Berkeley
MS, Water Resources and
Water Quality
Engineering, 2003
BS, Environmental
Engineering, 1999
Certifications
Professional Civil
Engineer (PE),
CA No. 64331
Professional Affiliations
WateReuse Association

6.e
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 hydraulic model, an updated capacity analysis of the City’s collection system, a process evaluation of the wastewater treatment plant, and a list of recommended CIP projects for long-term reliability of the City’s wastewater system.
2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan, Western Municipal Water District, California. Water/Recycled Systems Task Lead. Dudek’s goal for the project is to develop a clear and usable document that addresses the short- and longterm needs associated with the District’s potable water, sewer, and recycled water systems within its Riverside service area. The project includes review and validation of the District’s water and recycled water hydraulic models, construction and calibration of a sewer hydraulic model, review and evaluation of the capacity of the District’s treatment facilities, and development of a program environmental impact report and financial strategy to update connection and capacity charges. Potable water, recycled water, and wastewater collection system CIP projects will be integrated, and their timing will be based on growth projections. Dudek is developing a browserbased tool to track the CIP and evaluate project triggers to forecast and update project timing.

Sewer Master Plan, City of Pasadena, California. Served as senior engineer. Dudek provided a comprehensive evaluation of hydraulic capacity through updated flow monitoring and hydraulic modeling, condition assessment, and identification of improvements needed for system operation and reliability. As the City is 99% built out and historically has not experienced significant capacity issues, Dudek’s approach focused efforts on identifying rehabilitation needs, quantifying specific repair methods, grouping improvements by region, and, most importantly, applying prioritization of recommended improvements to address the most critical issues first. Taking a system-wide perspective and focusing on key improvement areas that mitigate high risk, City staff will have confidence that the collection system will continue to operate and be maintained in a cost-effective way.

Wastewater Master Plan and Condition Assessment, City of San Marino, California. Served as project manager.

The City of San Marino needed assistance understanding its sewer collection system needs and establishing its first sewer master plan. The City is completely built out; therefore, Dudek’s work focused on condition assessment of pipelines and lift stations rather than on capacity analysis. The pipeline condition assessment work included review of approximately 20 miles of pipeline (40% of the system) and identification of areas needing rehabilitation work, primarily consisting of cured-in-place pipe lining of aging sewer pipelines. The lift station condition assessment work included site visits and inspections of three lift stations. Redundancy and bypass improvements, as well as a frequent maintenance schedule, were recommended in the sewer master plan. An updated SSMP was developed as part of this project and focused on improving procedures for reducing sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

Wastewater Treatment and Collection System Master Plan, Crestline Sanitation District, California. Served as task lead, leading the development and analysis of the District’s wastewater collection for the project. A hydraulic model for the District’s 73 miles of gravity sewer and two lift stations was developed in InfoSewer. Flow monitoring was performed, and the resultant data was used to calibrate the model within 5% of field conditions. Project buildout loading was estimated using flow generation factors and District development data. The model analyzed both current and build-out peak dry and peak wet weather (25-year storm) loading conditions to assess current and future capacity limitations in the system. A master plan report was developed, which presented findings and provided recommendations for CIP development.

Water Master Plan Update, Lee Lake Water District, Corona, California. Served as project engineer responsible for updating the existing demands and demand projections for 2025 and system build-out; creating the water model; confirming peaking factors and fire flow requirements; modeling existing, future (2025), and ultimate build-out scenarios; and drafting the report along with all associated graphics. The District is in the process of planning for future water supplies. A target of this master plan update—last updated in 2004—was to confirm whether the District had sufficient supply from its source, given the known and potential development anticipated for the area.

Supply was confirmed, providing the District with confidence moving forward in its planning process.

6.e
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Greg Ripperger, PE

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Greg Ripperger (GREG RIP-er-ger; he/him) is a project manager with 15 years’ professional experience as a water engineer specializing in master planning, water system design, construction management, and hydraulic modeling.

Mr. Ripperger has worked as a project manager for Civiltec Engineering and as a project engineer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. Ripperger works with clients to quickly understand and solve their water/wastewater issues throughout a wide range of projects. He thrives in managing complex projects with unique solutions.

Relevant Previous Experience
2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan, Western Municipal Water District, Riverside, California. Water Systems Task Lead. Dudek is providing Western Municipal Water District with its 2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan. The goal of the project is to develop a clear and usable document that addresses the short- and long-term needs associated with the district’s potable water, sewer, and recycled water systems within their Riverside Service Area. The project includes review and validation of the district’s water and recycled water hydraulic models, construction and calibration of a sewer hydraulic model, and review and evaluation of the capacity of the district’s treatment facilities. Potable water, recycled water, and wastewater collection system Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects will be integrated, and their timing will be based on growth projections. Dudek is developing a browser-based tool to track the CIP and evaluate project triggers to forecast and update project timing. The project also includes development of a program environmental impact report and financial strategy to update connection and capacity charges.
2020 Water Master Plan and Rate Study, City of Covina, California. Served as project manager. Completed a full review of the City of Covina’s water system, including a full asset condition assessment, system analysis, water model update, and water rate study (conducted in coordination with Raftelis). Compiled and prioritized the projects identified to establish a 5-year capital improvement plan. Presented the recommendations of the Water Master Plan and Rate Study to the Covina City Council for adoption. The Water Master Plan was finalized in July 2020, and the Rate Study was finalized and implemented in February 2021. 2020 Water Master Plan Update, City of Brea, California. Served as project manager. Completed a thorough update of the City of Brea’s 2009 Water Master Plan, which included updating supply and demand projections, reviewing buildout projections, and re-analyzing all the system’s assets. Worked with Psomas to rebuild the City’s geographic information system database and water model based on existing as-builts. Compiled a detailed capital improvement plan based on analyses performed, evaluation of operational issues, and review of previous Master Plan capital improvement programs. Prioritized projects, created cost estimates, and developed individual project descriptions for the capital improvement plan. The draft report was completed in December 2020.

Education
Oklahoma State
University
BS, Civil Engineering,
2008
Cum Laude, Honors
Certifications
Professional Engineer, CA
No. 79499; AZ No. 67991
Water Audit Validator,
American Water Works
Association
Professional Affiliations
American Water
Works Association
Southern California Water
Utilities Association

6.e
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 2017 Water Master Plan, San Antonio Water Company, Upland, California. Served as project manager. Performed analysis on the San Antonio Water Company’s two separate distribution systems: retail potable water to San Antonio Heights and wholesale irrigation water. The irrigation system is a complex system that sells water to other water agencies through direct connections and groundwater basin recharge. The purpose of the Water Master Plan was to analyze both systems to identify necessary infrastructure improvements. It also included facilitating and implementing a strategic plan within the organization to provide a company-wide vision for the future. The Company is a stakeholder-owned water mutual company that includes the City of Upland, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, several water agencies, and the residential and commercial customers on the retail side. The Water Master Plan was published in December 2017.

Catalina Island Drought Plan, California. In conjunction with USBR, Mr. Ripperger worked with Southern California Edison (water purveyor), the City of Avalon, Catalina Conservancy, and other stakeholders to develop the Island’s DCP.

The island experienced severe water rationing requirements during the 2012-2016 drought due to multiple dry years that reduced available water supplies. The island has a desalination plant, but the plant is not capable of meeting the island’s full water demand. The plan considered the island’s vulnerabilities, current drought monitoring practices, and water conservation triggers to assist in developing a comprehensive drought monitoring and response plan to preserve water supplies for future droughts. The plan is still under development.

Design of New Supply Recycled Water and Potable Water Pipelines on the Reservation, Barona Band of Mission Indians, Lakeside, California. Project Manager for the design services for new supply pipelines for potable and recycled water from Ramona Municipal Water District. Dudek recently completed a preliminary design report detailing the alignment and design requirements for the pipeline. The potable water pipeline will be 12-inch and require a small pump station and a pressure reducing station. It will connect to Ramona’s 16-inch pipeline in San Vicente Road and will run approximately 39,000 LF to the intersection of Barona Road and Dump Road. Due to the elevation difference from the connection point to the high point of the pipeline, it will be necessary to construct a small booster station near the reservation boundary. The pipeline will then descend to the Reservation’s lower pressure zone where a Pressure Reducing Station will be constructed at the lower pressure zone boundary to decrease the pressure as it enters the zone. The project is currently under design by Dudek.

Infrastructure Pilot Toolkit, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino County. Served as project manager. The project seeks to provide a guideline, or toolkit, to provide clarity for how unincorporated areas of the County will be served water, sewer and other infrastructure in order to support anticipated long term growth. The project included compiling utility information for water and sewer districts that serve unincorporated areas, comparing the current infrastructure to areas of potential development. The project included analysis of water, sewer, solid waste, electrical, gas, and telecommunication. The long-term growth capacity of each area was then used to identify the combination of both population increasing and the physical feasibility of servicing that population growth.

6.e
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Russ Bergholz, PE, PMP

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Russ Bergholz is a principal engineer with 29 years of experience. Mr.

Bergholz manages Dudek's Water Infrastructure Group and is responsible for engineering water-/recycled water-related system master plans and design projects. His experience includes developing numerous water, recycled water, sewer master plans, pipeline design projects (including trenchless technology), and infrastructure rehabilitation projects for many Southern California cities and special districts. Mr. Bergholz has a documented record of accomplishment in keeping projects within scope and budget while maintaining quality control and addressing the critical success factors of his client's projects. As a project manager, he is responsible for the tracking, monitoring, team delegation, deliverable quality assurance, engineering guidance, accounting, and client and subconsultant coordination associated with each project, including the final stamp and signature of project plans and specifications.

P2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan, Western Municipal Water District, roject Experience Riverside, California. Principal in charge and quality control. Dudek provides Western Municipal Water District with its 2020 Riverside Facilities Master Plan. The project aims to develop a clear and usable document that addresses the short- and long-term needs associated with the district's potable water, sewer, and recycled water systems within their Riverside Service Area. The project includes review and validation of the district's water and recycled water hydraulic models, construction and calibration of a sewer hydraulic model, and review and evaluation of the capacity of the district's treatment facilities. Potable water, recycled water, and wastewater collection system Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects will be integrated, and their timing will be based on growth projections. Dudek is developing a browser-based tool to track the CIP and evaluate project triggers to forecast and update project timing. The project also includes the development of a program environmental impact report and financial strategy to update connection and capacity charges.

Citywide Wastewater System Master Plan, City of Redlands, California. Principal engineer. Dudek is supporting the City of Redlands in an update to their previous 1998 SMP. The City of Redlands' wastewater collection system includes 240 miles of sewer pipeline and one sewer lift station. Wastewater is treated at a city-owned 9.5-milliongallon-per-day wastewater treatment plant that utilizes two parallel treatment systems—a 6-million-gallon-per-day membrane bioreactor treatment process and a 3.5-million-gallon-per-day conventional process. This master plan update will result in a new hydraulic model, an updated capacity analysis of the city's collection system, a process evaluation of the wastewater treatment plant, and a list of recommended Capital Improvement Program projects for the long-term reliability of the city's wastewater system.

Education
University of California,
Davis
BS, Civil Engineering,
1995
Licenses and
Certifications
Professional Civil
Engineer
CA No. 59395
Project Management
Institute PMP
No. 1472209
Professional Affiliations
American Public Works
Association
California Water
Environment Association
Water Environment
Federation

6.e
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 Sewer Master Plan, City of Pasadena, California. Served as project manager. Dudek provided a comprehensive evaluation of hydraulic capacity through updated flow monitoring and hydraulic modeling, as well as condition assessment and identification of improvements needed for system operation and reliability. As the City of Pasadena is 99% built out and historically has not experienced significant capacity issues, Dudek's approach focused on identifying rehabilitation needs, quantifying specific repair methods, grouping improvement by region, and prioritizing recommended improvements to address the most critical issues first. Taking a systemwide perspective and focusing on key improvement areas that mitigate high risk, city staff will have confidence that the collection system will continue to operate and be maintained cost-effectively.

Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, City of San Marino, California. Served as principal engineer. The City of San Marino needed assistance understanding its sewer collection system needs and establishing its first SMP.

The city is completely built out; therefore, work focused on condition assessment of pipelines and lift stations rather than capacity analysis. The pipeline condition assessment included a review of approximately 20 miles of pipeline (40% of the system) and identifying needed rehabilitation work, primarily consisting of CIPP lining of aging sewer pipelines. The lift station condition assessment work included site visits and inspections of three lift stations. Redundancy and bypass improvements and a frequent maintenance schedule will be recommended in the SMP. An updated Sanitary Sewer Management Plan will also be developed as part of this project and will focus on improving procedures for reducing sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

Sewer Master Plan Update, City of Encinitas, California. Served as project manager. The project created the Cardiff and Encinitas Sanitary Division SMP and supporting documents. The master planning effort included evaluating the Encinitas and Cardiff sewer service areas and separate sewer outfalls. The work also included a CCTV review and condition assessment of the existing Olivenhain Trunk Sewer manholes and an evaluation of multiple alternatives for improving the capacity and performance of this vital trunk sewer within the Cardiff Sanitation District. A detailed twophase long-term Capital Improvement Program was developed for both sewer service districts.

Water System Master Plan Development, Indio Water Authority, Indio, California. Served as project manager. The master planning effort included rezoning the water system to improve water circulation and pressure challenges. A new set of operational programs, standard details, and document management system were also developed.

Managed the year-long project and assisted in the development of the full capital improvement program.

Water and Sewer Master Plans, City of Carlsbad, California. Served as project manager and lead water engineer.

In 2003, served as lead engineer for the water portion of the water master plan project. A water system hydraulic model was created using H2ONET to simulate existing, future, fire flow, and emergency conditions. Model results were analyzed and used to develop the updated capital improvement plan. Once the modeling and capital improvement plan were finalized, prepared the water master plan update.

Wastewater and Stormwater GIS Mapping, City of Vista, Served as project manager. The SMP included the development of a fully calibrated hydraulic model of the sewer collection system for capacity evaluation. The stormwater master plan included a highly detailed and thorough evaluation of existing stormwater facilities, an inventory of existing stormwater structures, the creation of a GIS layer containing geometry, condition, and capacity information, and the creation of a stormwater hydraulic model for capacity analysis. Stormwater runoff calculations were performed using the San Diego modified rational and typical rational methods for comparison.

Watersheds were limited to no larger than 2 acres to improve accuracy.

Wastewater Master Plan Update with Integrated GIS, Valley Sanitary District, Indio, California. Served as project manager. Developed the sewer GIS, hydraulic model, sewer collection system master plan, and capital improvement program. The project included the complete development of the system GIS (over 800,000 linear feet of pipelines), a hydraulic model of the entire collection system (HYDRA) with parcel-based flow calibration, and the development of an extensive capital improvement plan to take Valley Sanitary District from current to ultimate build-out conditions.

6.e
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Shannon Brown, PE, QSD

RISK ANALYSIS/GIS
Shannon Brown (SHA-nin BROWN; he/him) is a civil engineer with 12 years’ experience as a consultant specializing in stormwater, water, and sewer management and infrastructure project design. Mr. Brown is experienced in a broad range of disciplines, including regulatory permit compliance, preparation of design drawings and specifications, hydrology, hydraulics and risk assessment modeling, and geospatial analysis. Mr. Brown has a background in state and federal environmental compliance, including environmental impact documentation, special studies, and field data collection.

Project Experience
Municipal Waterways Maintenance Plan, City of San Diego, California. Served as project engineer. The Municipal Waterways Maintenance Plan supports the findings of a programmatic environmental impact statement for maintenance of more than 60 earthen and concrete-lined channels throughout the City.

Project work included preparation of hydrologic and hydraulic assessments, associated technical reporting, and planning and construction-level channel maintenance plans. The hydraulic studies include Hydrologic Engineering Center – River Analysis System analysis to determine the extent of maintenance required to restore each channel’s flood control function while minimizing the impacts to sensitive environmental resources in the area.

Brine Line Criticality Assessment, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), Inland Empire, California. Served as project engineer. SAWPA owns, operates, and manages the Inland Empire Brine Line with capacity rights of 30 million gallons per day. Dudek supported SAWPA in undertaking a project to review the financial basis of its reserve funding and hired Dudek to perform a risk analysis on the Brine Line system. The risk analysis included both COF and LOF analyses, ranked the Brine Line segments on overall risk. Rankings were translated into reserve funding and results used to support prioritization of future CIP projects.

Terminals Action Plan, Port of San Diego, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek prepared and managed development of an action plan for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit compliance at three of the Port’s marine terminals. The action plan consists of a tenant best management practice (BMP) plan, stormwater monitoring program, program assessment plan, long-term BMP plan, and tenant outreach plan.

Ongoing responsibilities include implementation of program assessment goals, which consists of evaluation of tenant BMP inspection and audit results, comparison of monitoring results to structural and nonstructural BMP installations, and assessment of tenant and terminal user stormwater pollution prevention knowledge.

Trash Amendments Planning, City of Carlsbad, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek prepared a regulatory compliance implementation plan and internal action plan. The implementation plan detailed installation of structural and nonstructural stormwater trash control BMPs throughout the City under a Track 2 compliance Education
California State University,
Fullerton
MS, Environmental
Engineering, 2017
University of California,
Davis
BS, Environmental and
Resource Science, 2009
Certifications
Professional Civil
Engineer (PE), California
No. 92771
Qualified Stormwater
Developer (QSD)
No. 92771
OSHA 30-Hour
Construction Safety

6.e
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 pathway and a citywide On-Land Visual Trash Assessment control monitoring program. Dudek also prepared an action plan that serves as a framework for internal implementation of the trash amendments, documenting annual steps for a multidepartment, collaborative effort to ensure compliance within the allotted 10-year time frame. In December 2018, the final implementation plan was submitted for approval to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and an internal action plan was developed in 2019.

Santa Maria Wastewater Reclamation Plant Headworks Design, Ramona Municipal Water District, Ramona, California.

Served as project engineer. Dudek led a team of civil, mechanical, structural, and electrical engineers through the design process for a new 5-million-gallons-per-day headworks facility. Project work included design and coordination with vendors for Archimedian screw pumps, mechanical bar screens, screenings handling equipment, grit handling equipment, and associated hydraulic calculations. Design work included process–flow diagrams, hydraulic profiles, and piping and instrumentation diagrams. Overall project design included the new headworks facility, influent and effluent sewers, yard piping for potable and non-potable hookups, and civil site design.

Park Drive Drainage Improvements, City of Carlsbad, California. Served as project engineer. The project scope includes addressing retaining wall degradation, slope failures, and drainage issues along Park Drive to alleviate safety concerns and reduce maintenance efforts. In addition to standard engineering solutions, the team evaluated bioengineering solutions to improve erosive conditions. Dudek is preparing final engineering documents.

Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit Compliance Program, City of Goleta, California. Served as technical reviewer and project engineer. Dudek is currently supporting the City of Goleta through technical project implementation and extension of staff services. Dudek has played a key role in overhauling and redeveloping Goleta’s Phase II stormwater program to ensure all municipal operations and new development requirements meet or exceed the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit provisions. Dudek combined local and regional stormwater expertise to develop a list of prioritized action items designed to address stormwater program needs based on each item’s relative threat to water quality, operational feasibility, and budget. Ongoing program support activities include preparation of technical reports and analyses, development of stormwater training materials and jurisdictional program procedures, regulatory audit preparation, drafting and issuance of notice of violations to City stakeholders, illicit connection/illicit discharge investigations, new development stormwater plan review, stormwater pollution prevention plan development, and post-construction BMP inspection.

As-Needed Project Support, City of Monterey, California. Served as project engineer. Dudek has supported City stormwater program tasks since 2018, including a stormwater fee study and development of the City’s trash amendment compliance plan. The fee study included analysis of the cost of City implementation of stormwater requirements associated with the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System general permit. The analysis was intended to provide City decision-makers with information on current program costs, revenues, and options for fee-based cost-recovery scenarios for City compliance activities. For trash amendment compliance, Mr. Brown assisted in preparation of the City’s Track 2 Implementation Plan as well as development of internal planning documents for use by planning, engineering, and operations staff.

Saratoga Creek Hazard Tree Removal and Restoration Project: Hydrology and Hydraulics Analysis and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, Santa Clara Valley Water District, San Jose, California. Served as project engineer. This project involves revegetation of a half-mile of stream bank after hazard tree removal activities. Mr. Brown developed a Hydrologic Engineering Center – River Analysis System model of the project area to assess potential impacts to bank stability following tree removal and restoration. Following the design phase, Mr. Brown assisted in the development of a multiyear stormwater pollution prevention plan for the restoration construction activities.

6.e
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Ken Muntz, EIT

RISK ANALYSIS/GIS
Ken Muntz has 8 years of experience as a project/design engineer on a variety of conveyance, collection, storage, pumping, and rehabilitation projects. His main expertise is the design of water and sewer pipelines ranging in diameter from 6 to 48 inches for a variety of materials, including cement-mortar lined and coated (CML&C) steel, PVC, and high-density polyethylene pipe. His design experience focuses on developing technical reports, construction plans, and specifications. Mr. Muntz’s technical skills include a variety of AutoCAD products (AutoCAD, Civil 3D, MEP, Storm and Sanitary Sewers), geographic information systems, and Flowmaster.

Project Experience
Crescent Drive Sewer Improvements, City of Vista, Vista, CA. Served as project engineer for relocation design of approximately 1,000 feet of existing 6-inch sewer pipeline. The existing sewer line existed within an easement along private properties and has been relocated to public ROW.

Fairview Trunk Rehabilitation, Orange County Sanitation District, Costa Mesa, California. Served as a project engineer aiding in the authorship of design memorandums for the lining of the Fairview Trunk Sewer and Fairview Relief Sewer. Primarily focused on sewage bypassing methods for the implementation plan to be submitted to Orange County Sanitation District. Tasks involved coordinating with sewer bypassing contractors, analyzing flows, preparing detailed plans for various scenarios, proposing bypass recommendations, and proposing optional bypass solutions to the recommendations.

Previous Experience
Orangewood Avenue and Dale Street Water Improvements Project, City of Garden Grove, Garden Grove and Stanton, California. Served as project engineer for approximately 7,000 linear feet of 8-inch and 12-inch water distribution mains. The project included the replacement of an existing water distribution main with upsized pipe; installation of new fire hydrants, laterals, and meters; application of governing agency standards and requirements for the County of Orange, City of Stanton, and City of Garden Grove; and preparation of drawings, specifications, and a cost estimate. Also served as the main client contact between the City of Garden Grove and the consultant, offering support that included general coordination, site investigations, preparing meeting agendas, delivering meeting presentations, preparing agency review comment responses, and bid phase services.

World Logistics Center, Highland Fairview, Perris, California. Served as project engineer, technical lead, and design lead for 16 miles of 12-inch to 24-inch water transmission lines, one 2.5-million-gallon-per-day booster pump station, and a 3-million-gallon reservoir. Also served as project engineer and design lead for 5 miles of 8-inch to 15-inch diameter gravity mains, two 500-gallon-per-minute lift stations, and 1 mile of force mains. Main tasks included coordinating new public rights-of-way, site grading, and features among various consulting groups; managing the team of designers for sewer and water facilities; quality assurance reviews; and investigations of Education
California State University,
Long Beach
BS, Civil Engineering,
2014
Certifications
Engineer-in-Training
(EIT), No. 14-612-66

6.e
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 existing facilities and features. Overall role was to coordinate and manage the design packages to be approved by the local water and sewer services provider, Eastern Municipal Water District.

Murrieta Road Transmission Main, Eastern Municipal Water District, Menifee, California. As pipeline engineer, prepared design documents for the proposed 36-inch and 42-inch CML&C steel pipeline along Murrieta Road per agency standards and requirements. The 6,800-foot-long proposed pipeline had an expedited schedule to coordinate with the adjacent Perris II Desalination facility completion schedule. This project included the crossing of the Salt Creek channel using micro-tunneling, narrow streets with congested utility corridors, easement acquisition, and coordination with the City of Menifee for multiple future city projects and safeguards near the Salt Creek crossing. Primary tasks included authorship of technical memorandums and the preliminary design report; preparation of drawings, specifications, and a cost estimate; coordination with subconsultants, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and other relevant agencies; direct communication with the client; site visits; and attendance at client meetings.

Palos Verdes Golf Club Recycled Water Lateral and Lago Seco Pump Station, West Basin Municipal Water District, Lakewood, California. Served as project engineer for the 8-inch- and 10-inch-diameter recycled water mains and

1.7-million-gallon-per-day pump station. Provided existing utility data, provided pipeline alignments and profiles design, selected pumps, and developed design plans with correct agency standards and requirements. The scope for the 17,000+ feet of pipelines included trenchless areas, a California Department of Transportation crossing, and alignment evaluation. Prepared design plans for proposed recycled-water lines and pump station while managing the coordination to ensure consistency between the separate teams.

As-Needed Pipeline Replacement, Vista Irrigation District, Vista, California. Served as project engineer responsible for replacement of approximately 10,170 feet of pipelines. Performed pipeline design, verified fieldwork, coordinated design document production, and coordinated with the client.

6.e
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 1 Joseph A. Schneider, PE

PRINICPAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Joe Schneider is a principal electrical engineer with 25 years’ professional experience as an electrical, instrumentation, and controls engineer and 17 years’ experience specializing in instrumentation and control system design and electrical distribution system design for water treatment, wastewater treatment, water distribution facilities, and wastewater collection facilities.

Mr. Schneider’s instrumentation and control system design experience consists of the design of programmable logic controllers (PLC) based plant control systems and instrumentation, specification creation, and construction administration duties. His electrical design experience includes evaluation of site-wide electrical systems and medium and low-voltage electrical distribution system design up to 12.47 kilovolts (kV). These designs include redundant power options and emergency generators, lighting design, grounding system design, specification creation, construction administration duties, and start-up.

Mr. Schneider is experienced in managing multiple concurrent projects and meeting multiple deadlines. He utilizes his experience as an electrical system owner to understand client operations and concerns and provide design solutions to meet their needs.

Project Experience
Water Treatment
Deer Valley Water Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 2019, City of Phoenix, Arizona. Served as the lead electrical and controls engineer for rehabilitation of the 5 kV plant electrical distribution system and solids handling facilities for an 80 million-gallon-per-day (MGD) water treatment plant. Evaluated the existing plant electrical distribution system and identified load issues and equipment condition concerns, proposed design concept options for replacement and upgrade of the majority of the existing 5 kV electrical system and recommended which option to proceed with. Detailed design included replacement of major portions of the plant’s 5 kV system, including replacing all radial daisy-chained substations and switchgear with new main-tie-main 5 kV switchgear that provide redundant 12 kV feeds in separate manholes to new and existing substation transformers. Design also included replacement of 5 kV motor control centers and 480-volt (V) draw-out switchgear. Design, including drawings and specifications, was completed up to the agency review design submittal.

Wastewater Treatment
Jomax Water Reclamation Facility Phase 2B Expansion (2.25 to 3 MGD), Vistancia Development LLC, Peoria, Arizona. Served as the lead electrical and controls engineer in the design of electrical, instrumentation, and Education
Arizona State University,
BSE, Electrical
Engineering, 1999
Keller Graduate School of
Management of DeVry
University,
MBA, Project
Management, 2005
Certifications
Registered Electrical
Engineer, CA E19636
Registered Electrical
Engineer, AZ No. 43868
Registered Electrical
Engineer, FL No. 96087
Registered Electrical
Engineer, IN
No. PE12300407
Registered Electrical
Engineer, KY No. 38810
Registered Electrical
Engineer, NV No. 031135
Registered Electrical
Engineer, TX No. 108126
(Inactive)

6.e
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Agreement Exhibit F - Dudek - Proposal (6274 : Award RFP Water and Sewer Master Plan and Cost of Service Rate Study) 2 controls to expand the wastewater plant capacity from 2.25 MGD to 3 MGD. The existing 12 kV electrical distribution system and standby generator system was analyzed and modified to accommodate the expansion.

The existing Modicon PLC control system was modified to accommodate the expansion. Phase 2B expansion design included the addition of new process facilities to increase plant capacity from 2.25 MGD to 3 MGD.

Electrical, LED lighting, ground, and controls design added the expanded plant processes to the existing electrical system at the 480 V level and to the existing plant control system. Processes included modification of the existing influent pump station; replacement of existing bar screen; and addition of new bar screen, grit classifier, grit pump, aeration basin, sludge holding tank, and dewatering centrifuge and conveyors. Design included drawings, specifications, and engineer’s estimate of probable construction cost.

Water Production, Reservoirs, and Distribution
Water Master Plan and Rate Study Services, City of Signal Hill, California. Served as the lead electrical and controls engineer in the condition assessment of the City’s water treatment and distribution system, which included three reservoirs, three booster pump stations, 3 well sites, and two ground water treatment facilities.

Assessed each site’s electrical system age and condition. Evaluated the existing sites’ control system and telemetry system age and condition. Discussed concerns and issues with City staff. Recommended upgrades with priority rankings.

Vistancia Community Facilities District Zone 7/8/9 Reservoir Pump Station, Vistancia Development LLC, Peoria, Arizona. Served as the lead electrical and controls engineer in the design for a new water distribution facility that includes two reservoirs on Zone 7 with mixers, Zone 8 booster pump station (five pumps), Zone 9 booster pump station (five pumps), chlorination facility with chlorine residual analyzers to maintain disinfection, two hydropneumatic tanks, ATS, standby diesel generator, 2000 amp (A) SES, motor control center, power quality meter, surge protection, two electrical buildings, VFD driven pumps, Modicon PLC control panel, fiber optic communication, radio communication backup, interior and site exterior LED lighting, and grounding system.

Design included drawings and specifications up to the 90% design submittal.

Gilbert Reclaimed Reservoir No. 1 Rehabilitation, Town of Gilbert, Arizona. Served as the lead electrical and controls engineer for the design and construction administration to rehabilitate two existing metal reclaimed water reservoirs and replace the existing dilapidated and water damaged SES and motor control center with new 480 V, 400 A SES and MCC. The existing site PLC control panel was also replaced with an Allen-Bradley PLC control panel. The existing site booster pump station was re-powered from the new MCC and controlled by the new PLC.