El Centro City Council
February 4, 2025

AGENDA

CITY OF EL CENTRO

CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2025
City Hall Regular Meeting 4:00 PM

CITY HALL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1275 MAIN STREET
EL CENTRO, CA 92243
The public may attend in person. Any member of the public attending in person and wishing to make a comment is asked to complete a speaker slip and follow the instructions below regarding “Notice to the Public”. Any member of the public is invited to submit public comments in advance of the meeting to be answered at the meeting. Please email your questions to [email protected] or call 760-337-4515 by February 4, 2025.

COUNCIL MEMBERS, STAFF AND THE PUBLIC MAY ATTEND VIA ZOOM.

To participate and make a public comment in person, via Zoom or telephone, please raise your hand, speak up and introduce yourself.

Join Zoom Meeting:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85185359843?pwd=MfbCBVaUm6KELLbz6Eo4ANgjUr38aQ.1 Optional dial-in number: (669) 900-6833
Meeting ID: 851 8535 9843 Passcode: 729762
Public comments via zoom are subject to the same time limits as those in person.

Mayor and Council Members may be reached at (760) 336-8989 Mayor:

Mayor Pro-Tem:

Council Members:

Tomás Oliva
Sonia Carter
Sylvia Marroquin
Claudia Camarena
Marty Ellett
Interim City Manager: Daniel Paramo
City Attorney: Elizabeth Martyn Evans
City Clerk: Norma Wyles
4:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - CONFERENCE ROOM "A":

ROLL CALL (Open Session)

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT:

Any member of the public wishing to address the City Council on any matter appearing on the closed session may do so at this time. Unless the Mayor extends the time limit, remarks shall be limited to three (3) minutes. Additional opportunities for Public Comments will be given during and at the end of the meeting.

CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNS INTO CLOSED SESSION:

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION:

REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIORS
Closed Session Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.8 - Closed Session with Negotiator Regarding Real Property Transactions.

Property Address: 1415 Ross Avenue and related properties Negotiating with: IVHD and UCSD representatives
Under negotiation: Terms and Conditions

POSSIBLE LITIGATION AGAINST THE CITY
Closed session pursuant to Govt. Code section 54956.9(b)(2)-potential litigation against the City - 2 items
CLOSED SESSION PURSUANT TO GOVT. CODE SECTION 54957
Closed Session pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54957 - Public Employee Appointment City Manager Recruitment
6:00 PM - OPEN SESSION:

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
This is a public meeting. If there is an item on the agenda on which you wish to be heard, you are asked to complete a blue speaker slip and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Persons wishing to address the Council are not required to identify themselves (Gov’t Code § 54953.3); however, this information assists the Mayor by ensuring that all persons wishing to address the Council are recognized and also assists the City Clerk in preparing the City Council meeting minutes.

When the item is announced and your name is called by the Mayor, please step to the podium and state your name for the record. Unless the Mayor extends the time, there is a three (3) minute time limit for each public presentation. If you wish to address the Council concerning any other matter not appearing on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment portion of the agenda. However, you may not show a visual presentation without review of that material. If you do so, you will be considered out of order. * Any information provided on the “Speaker Slip” is voluntary and will be public record.

CALL TO ORDER:

ROLL CALL BY CITY CLERK:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

INVOCATION:

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION:

6:10-6:15 PM - (TIME MAY VARY) PUBLIC COMMENTS:

The City Council welcomes your input. At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the posted agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will be taken on any issue brought forth under Public Comments. We ask that you please complete a “Speaker Slip” and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting.

Although you are not required to identify yourself (Gov’t Code §54953.3); this information on the “Speaker Slip” assists the Mayor that all persons wishing to address the Council are recognized and also assists the City Clerk in preparing the City Council meeting minutes. Unless the Mayor extends the time, there is a three (3) minute time limit for each public presentation. * Any information provided on the “Speaker Slip” is voluntary and will be public record. 6:15-6:20 PM - PRESENTATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS BY MAYOR:

1. Certificate of Recognition - El Centro Little League District 22 - Section 7 Champs. 6:20-6:25 PM - CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS 2-3 ):

2. Adopt Resolution No. 25- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH AVIAT U.S., INC. AND

AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE STATION PROJECT.

3. Approval of City Council meeting minutes of January 21, 2025. 6:25-6:55 PM - PUBLIC HEARINGS:

4. Public hearing to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map.

Presentation: Angel Hernandez, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution 25- , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO EIR 05-05.

PROJECT: Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map, consisting of an approximately 38- acre site north of McCabe Road, generally located west of South 4th Street (Highway 86) and 630 feet south of Horne Road.

5. Public hearing to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission Amending Resolution 07-17 Revising and Updating Conditions for the Willow Bend Subdivision.

Presentation: Angel Hernandez, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution No. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO AMENDING RESOLUTION 07-17 REVISING AND UPDATING CONDITIONS FOR THE WILLOW BEND SUBDIVISION.

6. Public hearing to consider amending the Zoning Map of the City of El Centro pertaining to Annexation EC 1-24 (Willow Bend Subdivision Annexation).

Presentation: Angel Hernandez, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Adopt Ordinance NO. 25- ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL

CENTRO AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO PERTAINING TO EC 1-24 (WILLOW BEND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION).

7. Public hearing to consider a resolution approving Annexation EC 1-24 (Willow Bend Subdivision Annexation).

Presentation:

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution No. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING ANNEXATION EC 1-24 (WILLOW BEND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION).
6:55 -7:15 PM - NEW BUSINESS:

8. Discussion and any necessary action regarding the Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan.

Presentation: Angel Hernandez, Community Development Director Recommendation:

Adopt the Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan.

9. Work Truck Purchase for Parks Division.

Presentation: Adriana Nava, Community Services Director Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution No. 25- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

EL CENTRO APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A WORK TRUCK FOR PARKS DIVISION BASED UPON INFORMAL BIDS.

LEGISLATIVE ACTION:

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
7:15-7:45 PM - TASK FORCE REPORTS AND MAYOR - COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS:
7:45-7:55 PM - CITY MANAGER REPORT:

ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, California 92243, Monday-Friday during normal business hours.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the office of the City Clerk at (760)337-4515.

Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangement to assure accessibility to this meeting.

City Council of the City of El Centro
1275 W. Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243

SUBMITTED
ACTION ITEM (ID # 2025-29)
Item: 1.

Meeting: 2/4/2025 4:00 PM
Department: City Clerk
Category: Presentation
Prepared by: Norma Wyles, City Clerk
Department Head: Tomás Oliva
DOC ID: 2025-29
Certificate of Recognition - El Centro Little League District 22 - Section 7 Champs.

CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKES, INSURANCE, ETC.:

N/A
BACKGROUND:

N/A
DISCUSSION:

N/A
CONCLUSION:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

None

City Council of the City of El Centro
1275 W. Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243

SUBMITTED
ACTION ITEM (ID # 2024-241)
Item: 2.

Meeting: 2/4/2025 4:00 PM
Department: Public Works
Category: Resolution
Prepared by: Catherine Gutierrez,
P.W. Analyst
Department Head: Abraham Campos
DOC ID: 2024-241
Adopt Resolution No. 25- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH AVIAT U.S., INC. AND

AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE STATION PROJECT.

CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 25- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH AVIAT U.S., INC. AND

AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE STATION PROJECT.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There will be no impact on the General Fund. The proposed $146,112 contract will be funded by Measure P bond funds and is within the project budget.

STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

Environmental Sustainability & Infrastructure
DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKES, INSURANCE, ETC.:

Although not required as it's an equipment purchase only, staff verified Aviat's status in the California Secretary of State website, which is active and in good standing.

BACKGROUND:

The construction of the new El Centro Police Station is ongoing. The existing communication system between ECPD and ICSO is obsolete and nontransferable to the new building.

DISCUSSION:

Aviat is a preferred vendor for communication systems by Imperial Valley Emergency Communication Agency, IVECA, and the City. The proposed contract provides for Aviat to provide and install a radio system to communicate between the new police building and the Imperial County Sheriff's Office, ICSO. The scope generally includes a new wallmounted antenna to be installed in the new building and at the ICSO location, together with supporting infrastructure.

The new system replaces the old and obsolete communication infrastructure at the existing police station tower.

CONCLUSION:

Adopt Resolution No. 25- , RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH AVIAT U.S., INC. AND

AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE STATION

PROJECT
ATTACHMENTS:

1. FINAL RESOLUTION 00079358

2. FINAL 00079018 BM 122424 Jan 2025 CLEAN FINAL CG 012825 w. Exhibits

12/2024/cdz/A24-0213/Reso/AgreementAviatUSInc 1
RESOLUTION NO. 25-

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL
CENTRO APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH AVIAT U.S.,
INC. AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT

FOR THE POLICE STATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of El Centro (the “City”) Police Station existing radio equipment must be replaced as part of the ongoing new Police Station Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Section 2-177 (a) (5), no competitive bidding is required for the purchase of such computer equipment and software; and WHEREAS, upon request on behalf of the City, Aviat U.S., Inc. submitted a proposal/statement of work NA220510-75600 in the amount of one hundred forty-six thousand one hundred twelve dollars and zero cents ($146,112.00); and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City Council to approve an Agreement and authorize the purchase of such equipment for the Police Station Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that its approval of the purchase is in the best interest of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the foregoing is true, correct and adopted.

2. That the City Council does hereby approve the Agreement and purchase.

3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and to take any and all necessary action to implement the provisions of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California held on the day of , 2025.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
By __________________________
Tomás Oliva, Mayor

12/2024/cdz/A24-0213/Reso/AgreementAviatUSInc 2
ATTEST:

By _____________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Office of the City Attorney
By _______________________________
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF IMPERIAL ) ss

CITY OF EL CENTRO )
I, Norma Wyles, City Clerk of the City of El Centro, California, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution No. 25- was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of El Centro, California, held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

By _________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 1 Rev. 07/18/2023

AGREEMENT FOR EQUIPMENT PURCHASE RELATED TO THE POLICE STATION

PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of the last signature date below (‘Effective Date’) between City of El Centro, a municipal corporation ("City") and, Aviat U.S., Inc. ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM
This Agreement shall be effective on the Effective Date and shall terminate on December 31, 2026.

2. SERVICES
Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Vendor shall perform the scope of work described in Proposal/Statement of Work No. NA220510-75600 dated November 1, 2024, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. This includes but is not limited to providing all services necessary for City. If there is any conflict between Exhibit “A” or “Exhibit B” and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

3. PERFORMANCE
Vendor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Vendor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. MANAGEMENT
The City’s Public Works Director or designee shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the administration of this Agreement and shall review and approve all services submitted by Vendor. The City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary documents.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
A. City and Vendor agree and represent this Agreement is entered into with the understanding Vendor is not an employee of City and is intended, for all purposes, to have the status of independent contractor under Labor Code Section 2776.

In the event the City determines a legal, judicial, or administrative determination has a material effect upon the status of Vendor as an independent contractor, the City shall have the right, with or without notice, to automatically terminate the Agreement. In the City’s sole discretion, the City may propose modification of the Agreement’s terms to permit Vendor’s continued provision of services. Such

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 2 Rev. 07/18/2023 modification of the Agreement’s terms shall be by written modification and agreed to by the parties.

B. Vendor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Vendor shall be free from control and direction of the City in connection with the performance of duties, and Vendor retains exclusive discretion in how to perform duties, subject to other terms and conditions of this Agreement. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Vendor shall at all times be under Vendor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents shall have control over the conduct of Vendor or any of Vendor's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement.

C. Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City. Vendor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against City, or bind City in any manner.

D. No employee benefits shall be available to Vendor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Vendor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Vendor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Vendor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.

6. PAYMENT
(a) The City agrees to pay Vendor within thirty (30) days of invoice date and in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Vendor’s proposal, Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
(b) Vendor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement, which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager or City Council, as applicable; provided, however, the City Manager or designee may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement but not to exceed ten-thousand dollars ($10,000). Vendor shall not be compensated for any additional services in the amounts greater than that authorized herein unless agreed to by the City Manager or City Council, depending upon the amount.
(c) Vendor will submit invoices for services based on the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit “B”. Invoices shall be submitted on a monthly basis for services provided. If the City disputes any of Vendor's fees it shall give written notice to Vendor within two (2) weeks of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 3 Rev. 07/18/2023 (d) Title and risk of loss of equipment shall transfer to the City upon delivery to City’s designated delivery point.

7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE (a) The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Vendor at least thirty (30) days prior written notices. Upon receipt of said notice, the Vendor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
(b) In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay the Vendor for services up to the date of termination based on the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit “B”. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Vendor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 5.

8. DEFAULT OF VENDOR
(a) The Vendor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Vendor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Vendor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Vendor. If such failure by the Vendor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Vendor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Vendor, it shall not be considered a default. (b) If the City determines that the Vendor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, City shall cause to be served upon the Vendor a written notice of the default. The Vendor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance or provide City with a plan to cure the default within a reasonable period of time. In the event that the Vendor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

9. INDEMNIFICATION
Vendor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, employees and agents, from and against any and all causes of action, claims, liabilities, obligations, judgments, or damages, including reasonable legal counsels’ fees and costs of litigation (“claims”), arising out of the Vendor’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement or out of the operations conducted by Vendor, including the City’s active or passive negligence, except for

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 4 Rev. 07/18/2023 such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. In the event the City indemnitees are made a party to any action, lawsuit, or other adversarial proceeding arising from Vendor’s performance of this Agreement, the Vendor shall provide a defense to the City indemnitees or at the City’s option, reimburse the City indemnities their costs of defense, including reasonable legal fees, incurred in defense of such claims.

Payment by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between Vendor and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence of the City or its officers, employees, or agents, Vendor will be obligated to pay for City’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the City as solely negligent. Vendor will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation.

10. NON-LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
No officer or employee of City will be personally liable to Vendor, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount that may become due to Vendor.

11. INSURANCE
Without limiting Vendor’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Vendor shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form that is satisfactory to City.

General liability insurance. Vendor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.

Automobile liability insurance. Vendor shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Vendor arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

Workers’ compensation insurance. Vendor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).

Vendor shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers.

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 5 Rev. 07/18/2023 Other provisions or requirements
Proof of insurance. Vendor shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. The certificate of insurance shall be endorsed to provide thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance.

Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the term of this contract. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

Duration of coverage. Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Vendor, his agents, representatives, employees or sub-vendors.

Primary/noncontributing. Coverage provided by Vendor shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

City’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Vendor or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Vendor payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.

Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.

Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this Agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Vendor or others providing insurance evidence in compliance

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 6 Rev. 07/18/2023 with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Vendor hereby waives its own right of recovery against City and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its sub-vendors.

Enforcement of contract provisions (non estoppel). Vendor acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Vendor of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Vendor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Vendor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and
Additional insured status. General liability policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies.

Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.

Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Vendor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

Pass through clause. Vendor agrees to ensure that its sub-vendors, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project who is brought onto or involved in the project by Vendor, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Vendor. Vendor agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Vendor agrees that upon request, all Agreements with Vendors, sub-vendors, and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review.

Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 7 Rev. 07/18/2023 eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible. Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these specifications unless approved by City.

Timely notice of claims. Vendor shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Vendor’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

Additional insurance. Vendor shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Work.

12. NOTICES
Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by notice:

To City: City of El Centro
Attention: City Clerk
Norma Wyles
1275 W. Main Street, El Centro CA 92243
To Vendor Aviat U.S., Inc.

Attention: Legal Department
200 Parker Drive, Suite C100 A
Austin, Texas 78728

13. ASSIGNMENT
The Vendor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, to any sub-Vendor without prior written consent of the City. Such written consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.

14. LICENSES
At all times during the term of this Agreement, Vendor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 8 Rev. 07/18/2023

15. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
In addition to any other permits or licenses, Vendor shall obtain, maintain and comply with the requirements for a current City business license during the term of this Agreement.

16. PREVAILING WAGES AND REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS - Installation When any of the services described herein are considered “public works” as defined by California Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., prevailing wage rates shall apply to that portion of the project. California State Prevailing Wage information is available through the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) websites below.
· Prevailing Wage FAQ
website: www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/FAQ_PrevailingWage.html
· Prevailing Wage Determination
website: http://www.dir.ca.gov/oprl/DPreWageDetermination.htm Wage rates for this project shall be in accordance with the “General Wage Determination made by the Director of Industrial Relations Pursuant to California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Sections 1770, 1773 and 1773.1”, for Imperial County.

The following Labor Code sections are hereby referenced and made a part of this Agreement:

1. Section 1775 – Penalty for Failure to Comply with Prevailing Wage Rates.

2. Section 1777.4 – Apprenticeship Requirements.

3. Section 1777.5 - Apprenticeship Requirements.

4. Section 1813 – Penalty for Failure to Pay Overtime.

5. Section 1810 and 1811 – Working Hour Restrictions.

6. Section 1775 – Payroll Records.

7. Section 1773.8 – Travel and Subsistence Pay.

8. Section 1776 – Payroll Records.

CONTRACTOR must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) of the State of California in order to be eligible to work on public works projects. CONTRACTOR must ensure registration with the DIR is active and in good standing.

This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

17. GOVERNING LAW

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 9 Rev. 07/18/2023 The City and Vendor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of El Centro.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

19. SEVERABILITY
The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this Agreement.

20. CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL
Vendor is bound by the contents of the proposal submitted by the Vendor, Exhibits “A” and “B” hereto.

21. ATTORNEY’S FEES
If any action at law or suit in equity, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought by either party with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, and such amount may be added to, and made a part of, such judgment.

22. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT
The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Vendor warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Vendor and has the authority to bind Vendor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

23. WAIVER
The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this agreement.

12/2024/A24-0213/Agreement/AviatU.S.Inc. 10 Rev. 07/18/2023

24. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Vendor and the City and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Such document shall expressly state that it is intended by the parties to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF EL CENTRO AVIAT U.S., INC.

By: ________________________ By: ________________________ Daniel Paramo, Interim City Manager William Hauze, VP Finance ATTEST:

By: _____________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Elizabeth L. Martyn, City Attorney

Statement
of Work

CITY OF EL CENTRO
El Centro PD Relocation
NA220510-75600
Project Services
Release 3.0
11/01/2024
Exhibit A

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 2

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Issue Releases
Issue
Number
Issue Release
Date Changes Preparer

1.0 05/31/2022 Initial Release Services G. Galvan

2.0 10/29/2024 Update to 1+1 HSB G. Galvan

3.0 11/01/2024 Update Customer and Decom G. Galvan

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 3

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 4 Purpose of Document ....................................................................................................4 Project Scope ...............................................................................................................4 Supporting Documents ..................................................................................................5 System Summary .........................................................................................................7 MPLS Design Scope for Projects with this Feature .............................................................8 Validity of Quote...........................................................................................................8 Period of Performance ...................................................................................................8 Specific Personnel and/or Field Crew Request...................................................................8 Field Crew Mobilization ..................................................................................................8 Onsite Meetings.........................................................................................................8 Towers and Antenna Structures...................................................................................8 Water Tank Antenna Mounts .......................................................................................8 Construction, Site and Civil Drawings ...........................................................................8 Battery Storage and Charging for projects that include batteries .....................................8

2. PLANNING AND DESIGN SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ..................................... 10 Project Management ...................................................................................................10 Microwave Network Design ..........................................................................................11 Microwave Path Design................................................................................................12 Project Engineering .....................................................................................................13

3. INSTALLATION, INTEGRATION & TESTING ................................................................ 15 Installation Services ....................................................................................................15 Integration Services ....................................................................................................15 Testing Services .........................................................................................................15 Installation, Integration, & Testing Responsibilities..........................................................15 Aviat Networks Installation, Integration, & Testing Deliverables........................................19

4. EQUIPMENT DECOMMISSION ..................................................................................... 20 Decommission Services ...............................................................................................20

5. APPENDIX A: PROJECT MANAGEMENT........................................................................ 21

6. APPENDIX B: NETWORK ENGINEERING...................................................................... 23

7. APPENDIX C: TRANSMISSION ENGINEERING............................................................. 24

8. APPENDIX D: PROJECT ENGINEERING ....................................................................... 29

9. APPENDIX E: INSTALLATION, INTEGRATION & TESTING ........................................... 30

10. APPENDIX F: ASSUMPTIONS & EXCLUSIONS.............................................................. 32

11. APPENDIX G: FIELD CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURE...................................................... 33

12. STATEMENT OF WORK SIGN-OFF................................................................................ 35

13. PROJECT COMPLETION SIGN-OFF .............................................................................. 36

14. AVIAT STANDARD DRAWINGS.................................................................................... 37

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 4

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose of Document
This Statement of Work (“SOW”) specifies the deliverables and defines the responsibilities and other relevant terms applicable to the planning and delivery of microwave and associated products from Aviat U.S., Inc. (“Aviat Networks” or “Aviat”) and its partners, as well as the professional services required to engineer and implement the proposed solution for CITY OF EL CENTRO (“Customer”).

Execution of the services listed in this SOW is governed by Aviat’s standard terms and conditions (“Agreement”). Neither party is obligated to provide any services until the Agreement is executed by both parties and an order has been placed for services by CITY OF EL CENTRO and accepted by Aviat Networks. Where the terms of the Agreement differ from the terms of the SOW, the terms in the SOW shall control. Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Agreement.

Project Scope
This SOW applies to El Centro PD Relocation project proposed by Aviat Networks and cannot be extended to other projects.

Aviat Networks will provide the following services to CITY OF EL CENTRO:

Project Management Network Engineering Transmission Engineering Project Engineering Configuration Engineering/Drafting MPLS Network Services Factory Integration and Testing Antenna & Line Installation Radio Installation and Testing Network Integration Radio Decommission Antenna System Decommission DC Power System Installation and Testing DC Power System Decommission Civil Construction Field Technical Support Prevailing Wages: Yes
Freight Terms: Destination
Other:
___________________________________________________________________________________________ Any required services or material not specified in this SOW will be provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO and will not be considered part of Aviat Networks’ responsibilities. Aviat Networks reserves the right to quote and perform services not specified in this SOW in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Once Aviat Networks approves the new services, the new services will be added to this SOW in a mutually signed amendment to this SOW and the release of a new services purchase order. For a full list of Aviat provided equipment, please refer to the project equipment list.

CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks acknowledge that meeting the planned project completion date requires the cooperation of the parties. Any changes requested by CITY OF EL CENTRO before the design freeze date stated in Appendix B will be considered part of the design finalization phase of the project and not subject to a formal change order, if at Aviat Networks’ sole discretion, the requested change falls within the original scope and hours of the project. Any changes requested by CITY OF EL CENTRO after the design freeze date will be subject to review by Aviat Networks and may, at Aviat Networks’ sole discretion, result in a change order fee and/or a delay in delivery to the field. See Appendix B for more detail on the design freeze.

Completion and accuracy of all deliverables are subject to the integrity of the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO.

Aviat Networks is not responsible for validating the accuracy of the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO. Any changes resulting from incorrect information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO or any third party associated with Customer, will be charged to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order.

CITY OF EL CENTRO furthermore agrees that any delays caused by inadequate site readiness for which CITY OF EL CENTRO was responsible for may prohibit Aviat Networks from meeting the project completion date, and Aviat Networks may adjust the completion date. Unless otherwise agreed to in a mutually signed amendment to this SOW, any cost impact such delays might have on this SOW will be charged to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order. In the event of such delays, Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO will make a reasonable effort to resolve the issue and mutually agree on new project milestones.

Documents, deliverables, and work submitted by Aviat Networks to CITY OF EL CENTRO shall be reviewed and approved in ten (10) working days from the date of receipt. If the documents, deliverables, or work submitted by Aviat Networks include equipment

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 5

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
production or OEM ordering, Customer shall not review, approve, or comment on the documents, deliverables, or work, and the documents deliverables, or work shall, at Aviat’s option, either be (i) placed on hold or (ii) deemed accepted.

Aviat shall invoice Customer for equipment upon shipment of the equipment. Aviat shall invoice Customer for services upon completion of the services. Customer shall pay all invoices issues by Aviat within thirty (30) days of Aviat’s issuance of the invoice. If Customer does not pay an invoice within thirty (30) days of issuance of the invoice, Aviat shall assess a late penalty of the lesser of one-and-a-half percent (1.5%) or the greatest amount allowed by law.

Project Summary
Number of Hops
1 Number of Sites
2 Number of parallel RF Channels
NA
Number of Sites
NA
Radio Equipment Families
IRU/ODU 600
Frequency Band
11 GHz
Link Capacity
200 Mbps
Protection Type
MHSB
Traffic Type
Ethernet
Project Locations (States)
CA
Supporting Documents
The following documents will be provided by Aviat Networks in support of this project and must be accepted by CITY OF EL CENTRO as part of the project completion. It is CITY OF EL CENTRO’s responsibility to provide signed copies of the documents to Aviat Networks before the final project completion.

Document Master Document Requires Customer
Acceptance/Sign-off?
Planning
Project Schedule Project Schedule Yes
Statement of Work This document Yes
Statement of Work Sign-off This document Yes
Design
DC Power calculations Design Freeze Package No
Design Freeze Package Design Freeze Package Yes
Equipment List Equipment List No
Frequency Datasheets Path Survey Report No
Floor Plan Installation Specifications Yes
IP Plan Design Freeze Package Yes
NMS Plan Design Freeze Package Not Quoted
Path Calculations and Path Profiles Path Survey Report No Path Survey Report Path Survey Report Yes
Rack Profiles and Wiring Diagrams Installation Specifications No Site Survey Report Site Survey Report Yes
Synchronization Plan Design Freeze Package No
System Layout Design Freeze Package No
Traffic Plan Design Freeze Package Yes
Implementation
Antenna Installation Checklist Installation Specifications No Antenna Mounting Design Installation Specifications No
Antenna System Audit Form Installation Specifications No As Built Record Sets As Build Records Yes
Change Order Form This document Yes
Equipment Installation Checklist Installation Specifications Yes Field Acceptance Test Plan Installation Specifications Yes Installation Specifications Installation Specifications No Injury and Illness Prevention Installation Specifications No Project Completion Sign-off This document Yes
Punch List Completion Report Installation Specifications Yes Site Installation Completion Report Installation Specifications Yes

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 6

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Traffic Cutover Plan Installation Specifications Not Quoted RF Cutover Plan Installation Specifications Not Quoted

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 7

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
System Summary
Aviat Networks is pleased to present its proposal for the El Centro PD Relocation. The new El Centro antenna location will be installed on the dispatch building elevator equipment room parapet wall @ 48ft AGL.

The proposed radio configuration will be:

El Centro:
• New ODU600 radio (split-type) with new coaxial cable transmission line to due cable route on the building • New Eclipse INUe (Microwave Intelligent Nodal Unit)
• New relay rack
• New 3ft antenna
• Wall mounted antenna pipe mount
• New AC to DC converter. AC input protected by UPS
ICSO:
• New IRU600 radio (All Indoor) with new waveguide transmission line • New Eclipse INUe (Microwave Intelligent Nodal Unit)
• New relay rack
• New 3ft antenna
• New dehydrator
• Standard antenna mount
Spares:

Set of spares is included on the proposal
Warranty:

Standard City of El Centro 7 years warranty is included

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 8

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
MPLS Design Scope for Projects with this Feature
MPLS is not included on this proposal
Validity of Quote
A Quote is an invitation for an offer and a notice to Customer of these Conditions which automatically expires after one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of Quote, (i) if Customer has not issued Aviat US a purchase order or (ii) if the Quote is not signed by Customer and returned to Aviat US within such time frame.

Period of Performance
This project Period of Performance is 20 weeks After Receipt of Order (ARO), any delays beyond Aviat’s control will be addressed as a change order to CITY OF EL CENTRO, this includes any changes to the design, field implementation and coordination requiring additional hours for Network Engineer, Configurations Engineer, Drafter, Transmission Engineer, Program Manager, Project Engineer, and field crews.

Specific Personnel and/or Field Crew Request
None.

Aviat will make every effort possible to utilize requested personnel. However, if schedule and resource constraints arise demanding the use of alternate personnel, Aviat will communicate such resource plans with the client in a timely manner to allow for proper negotiations.

Field Crew Mobilization
Aviat has included 1 field crew mobilization(s) for the duration of field implementation phase, additional mobilizations will be billed on a time-and-expenses basis. Reference Appendix E: Installation, Integration & Testing section.

Onsite Meetings
Aviat did not quote any onsite meetings for this proposal.

Towers and Antenna Structures
Aviat assume all towers are climbable and antennas can be installed without the need of cranes or lifts; if after the site survey it is determined that a crane or lift is required, this will address as a change of scope with a change order to the customer to cover the additional cost.

Water Tank Antenna Mounts
Aviat is providing standard antenna mounts for this project. Customer is responsible for providing antenna mounting structure at all water tanks. Customer is responsible for providing tie-back points at all water tanks.

Construction, Site and Civil Drawings
Aviat is only providing the standard drawing package for the microwave equipment proposed for this proposal, reference section 14 of this document for reference. Customer is responsible for all other drawings required for this project.

Battery Storage and Charging for projects that include batteries Storage Location
If the battery is not to be installed at the time of receipt, it is recommended that it be stored indoors in a cool [77°F (25°C) or less], clean, dry location. Do not stack pallets or cell terminal damage may occur.

The storage interval from the date of battery shipment to the date of installation and initial charge should not exceed six (6) months. If extended storage is necessary, the battery should be charged at regular intervals until installation can be completed and float charging can be initiated. When in extended storage, it is advised to mark the battery pallets with the date of shipment and the date of every charge. If the battery is stored at 77°F (25°C) or below, the battery should be given a freshening charge

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 9

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
within 6 months of the date of shipment and receive a freshening charge at 6-month intervals thereafter. Storage at elevated temperatures will result in accelerated rates of self-discharge. For every 18°F (10°C) temperature increase above 77°F (25°C), the time interval for the initial freshening charge and subsequent freshening charges should be halved. Thus, if a battery is stored at 95°F (35°C), the maximum storage interval between charges would be 3 months (reference Appendix B). Storage beyond these periods without proper charge can result in excessive sulphation of plates and positive grid corrosion which is detrimental to battery performance and life. Failure to charge accordingly may void the battery’s warranty. Initial and freshening charge data should be saved and included with the battery historical records.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 10

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

2. PLANNING AND DESIGN SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Project Management

2.1.1.Project Management Services Provided by Aviat
Assigns an Aviat Networks Project Manager to manage the project Yes No

2.1.2.Project Management Responsibilities
Planning:

Develop project schedule for Aviat engineers Yes
Develop project schedule for CITY OF EL CENTRO’s supporting vendors Customer Establish an action register Aviat
Establish a communications plan Aviat and Customer
Establish a change management plan Aviat and Customer
Establish a risk management strategy Aviat
Provide quality standards and procedures document Aviat Establish a resource management plan for Aviat resources Aviat Develop a responsibility matrix, detailing principal team members by function Aviat Provide details of CITY OF EL CENTRO’s principal team members by function Customer Provide details of CITY OF EL CENTRO’s single point of contact for Aviat Customer Execution:

Act as primary point of contact for CITY OF EL CENTRO Aviat Finalize project terms and scope with CITY OF EL CENTRO Aviat Chair meetings to assign tasks, evaluate progress and address issues Aviat Coordinate Aviat Networks’ day-to-day activities through to project signoff Aviat Coordinate CITY OF EL CENTRO’s supporting vendors’ day-to-day activities Customer Monitor progress against the agreed-upon project milestones Aviat Report on progress as agreed to in the communications plan Aviat Manage project risk through risk identification, quantification and mitigation Aviat Ensure the terms and conditions of the contract are complied with Aviat Closeout:

Manage project close-out activities Aviat
Sign off on close-out activities and final deliverables Customer

2.1.3.Aviat Networks Project Management Deliverables
Project Schedule Action Register Risk Management Strategy Communication Plan Change Management Plan Progress Reports (as required) Refer to Appendix A for further details regarding the Project Manager’s role.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 11

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Microwave Network Design
Copies of equipment datasheets/user manuals Aviat

2.2.1.Network Design Responsibilities
Planning:

Microwave system requirements Customer
Existing traffic, IP and NMS plans Customer
Anticipated channel plan requirements Customer
Preliminary system design during or after initial proposal Aviat Preliminary path calculations for selected Aviat Networks radios Aviat Design:

Final equipment list Aviat
Final path calculations and path profiles Aviat
Site specific diagram (RP’s and wiring diagrams) Aviat
DS0 traffic plans Customer
DS1/DS3/OC3 traffic plans Not Quoted
IP traffic plans Aviat
NMS plan Not Quoted
Synchronization plan Customer
DC power calculations Aviat
Traffic cut-over plan and method of procedure Not Quoted Field acceptance test plan Aviat
Sign-off:

CITY OF EL CENTRO sign-off on final network design (design freeze) Customer

2.2.2.Aviat Networks Design Deliverables
Equipment List Design Freeze Package
Refer to Appendix B for further details regarding the network design.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 12

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Microwave Path Design
Path reliability

99.9995
%
BER
10^3 10^6
CITY OF EL CENTRO exempt from FCC license fee
Yes No

2.3.1.Path Design Services Provided by Aviat
RF interference paper study Aviat
RF field measurements Not Quoted

2.3.2.Path Design Responsibilities
Planning:

Documents relating to tower or structural analysis and drawings Customer Documents relating to previous path surveys and frequency coordination Customer Historical path performance details on a per link basis Customer Path clearance objective for each path Customer
Federal registration number (FRN) and username and password Customer Design:

Path surveys to confirm path reliability objectives Aviat Site elevation and coordinates Customer
Existing antenna mounting structure description and information (tower type) Aviat Existing building description and information Aviat
Site plan (drawing with major landmarks for location purposes) Customer Final path calculations and path profiles for each hop Aviat Identify locations of possible sources of spectral reflection Aviat Information concerning possible obstructions or obstacles Aviat Recommend antenna size, type, and mounting height Aviat Radio frequency coordination Aviat
Tower permit application Customer
Prepare and submit FCC license application (where applicable – Form 601) Aviat Prepare and submit environmental impact data Customer
Provide required environmental approvals or permits Customer File FCC construction completion notice Aviat
Sign-off:

Approve recommended antenna size, type and mounting height Customer CITY OF EL CENTRO sign-off on final path design Customer

2.3.3.Aviat Networks Path Design Deliverables
Microwave Path Survey Report Frequency Datasheets
Refer to Appendix C for further details regarding the path design.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 13

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Project Engineering

2.4.1.Project Engineering Services Provided by Aviat
Floor plan for Aviat installation scope Aviat
Traffic cutover plan Not Quoted
RF cutover plan Not Quoted
Field acceptance test plan Aviat
Installation specifications Aviat
Manage civil construction No
Manage field installation Aviat

2.4.2.Project Engineering Responsibilities
Planning:

Documents relating to tower or structural analysis and drawings Customer Site access policies and procedures Customer
Site access as required Customer
Building/shelter/enclosure access as required Customer
Design:

Site surveys Aviat
Existing tower description and information (tower type) Aviat Existing building description and information Aviat
Site plan (drawing with major landmarks for location purposes) Customer Environmental data (if required) Customer
Flooring, ceiling, racking data, and requirements to mount new hardware Customer All power, existing and future, with breaker assignments Customer Recommendation for placement of new equipment Aviat and Customer Identify and define antenna mounting hardware Aviat
Identify any grounding issues and recommend improvements Aviat Identify demarcation types and location between new and existing equipment Customer Existing waveguide dehydrator information and their associated cabling Aviat All structural information regarding power generator Customer Recommendation for any site or shelter upgrades Customer Recommendation for tower upgrades Customer
Execution:

Coordinate day-to-day field install activities through to project signoff Aviat Monitor field installation progress against the agreed-upon project milestones Aviat Report on field installation progress as agreed to in the communications plan Aviat Ensure proper site readiness prior to the install start date Customer Coordinate Aviat change orders until project completion Aviat Coordinate system acceptance and project completion Aviat Coordinate finalization of project close-out drawings and documents Aviat Review quality checklists and photos for defects Aviat

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 14

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

2.4.3.Aviat Networks Project Engineering Deliverables
Microwave Site Survey Report Traffic Cutover Plan RF Cutover Plan Field Acceptance Test Plan Installation Specification Project Closeout Package Refer to Appendix D for further details regarding Project Engineering.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 15

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

3. Installation, Integration & Testing
Installation Services
Tower installation Customer
Antenna system installation Aviat
Transmission line installation Aviat
Shelter installation Customer
Indoor equipment and rack installation Aviat
AC power equipment Customer
DC power equipment Not Quoted
Ground installation Customer
Antenna alignment Aviat
Integration Services
Microwave equipment integration Aviat
Dehydrator integration Aviat
NMS integration Not Quoted
Testing Services
Station test Aviat
Hop test Aviat
System test Aviat
Traffic cutover Not Quoted
RF cutover Not Quoted
Installation, Integration, & Testing Responsibilities
General project responsibilities:

Obtain all necessary environmental and public agency approvals/documentation Customer Obtain all necessary construction permits and documentation Customer Access to sites in accordance with the project schedule Customer Normal road access for all project related vehicles Customer Transport of Aviat Networks supplied equipment to Customer warehouse Aviat Transport of Aviat Networks supplied equipment to sites Aviat Transport of Aviat Networks personnel to and from sites Aviat Safety and first aid material and supplies to Aviat Networks personnel Aviat Site & civil services:

Leasing, zoning, permits and inspections Customer
Soil analysis or provide report Customer
Foundation design for tower/shelter Customer
Site construction (demolition, grading, erosion control, drainage, etc.) Customer Civil documentation for existing shelters and towers Customer Structural design package required to support proposed antenna system Customer Structural analysis report for the existing and new antenna system Customer Site layout drawings, plot plans or applicable architectural blueprints Customer Locate and mark all site boundaries and features Customer

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 16

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Secure storage for all equipment including radios, antennas and racks Customer Standard equipment packaging Aviat
Unpack Aviat Networks equipment and remove packing material from site Aviat Verify packing list to specifications Aviat
Installation services:

Tower installation:

Antenna system support structures: towers, monopoles and tripods Customer Ground resistivity measurements and report of newly installed ground system Customer Install tower foundation Customer
Tower painting Customer
Provide and install tower lights Customer
Provide and install safety climb and safety climb ladder Customer Provide and install lightning rod Customer
Provide and install platform Customer
Provide and install footing hardware and penetrations for structure on rooftops Customer Adequate earth ground in accordance with EIA/TIE standard 222G Customer Connect tower ground to site ground, in accordance with EIA/TIA standard 222G Customer Provide and install standard tower leg pipe mounts Aviat Provide and paint antennas to match structure or specific color Not Quoted Provide and paint lines to match structure or specific color Not Quoted Provide and install tower or rooftop pole mounts Customer Provide and install any required steel support members for side braces Aviat Provide and install specialized antenna mounts Not Quoted Provide and install standard face mounts Not Quoted
All RF/microwave antenna mounting brackets Aviat
Antenna feeder window/bridge and cable tray supports Customer Antennas and radomes at specified centerlines Aviat
Ice shields at specified locations Not Quoted
Cranes, man lifts, snowmobiles, ATV’s, or special hoisting equipment TBD after Surveys Transmission line installation:

Waveguide ladders Customer
Waveguide bridges Customer
Rooftop sleepers for transmission lines and ground plates Customer Provide and install cable trays Customer
Provide and install transmission lines Aviat
Provide and install hanger kits and ground kits Aviat
Penetrate building walls or roof and install waveguide ports and entry plates Customer Provide and install waveguide or coax boots at entry plates Aviat Provide and install lightning protector at entry points Aviat Provide and install conduit Customer
Terminate and label waveguide or coax runs Aviat
Shelter installation:

Provide shelters, cabinets or enclosures Customer
Provide and install shelter foundation Customer

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 17

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Shelter installation Customer
Indoor equipment and rack installation:

Provide and install cable ladders or trays Customer
Provide and install new racks in specified locations Aviat Provide and install bracing supports Aviat
Provide and install pressurization equipment Aviat
AC/DC power equipment and/or ground installation:

Perform electrical (underground conduits, trenching, AC power source, etc.) Customer Provide and install ground ring Customer
Provide and install generator and fuel tank Customer
Provide and install AC circuit breakers to support Aviat Networks equipment Customer Provide and install AC feeds from AC distribution to charger or UPS equipment Customer Provide and install DC circuit breakers to support Aviat Networks equipment Aviat Provide and install charger racks Not Quoted
Provide and install battery into charger rack or on floor as required Not Quoted Field integration services
Integrate Aviat Networks microwave equipment Aviat
Integrate rack ground to ground distribution in shelter Aviat Integrate DC wiring to specified distribution panels Aviat Integrate payload wiring to designated demarcation Aviat Integrate Ethernet wiring to designated demarcation Aviat Integrate alarm contacts to designated demarcation Aviat Integrate battery wiring to designated chargers Not Quoted Connect radio antenna ports to waveguide flex sections Aviat Set dehydrator pressure to 4psi Aviat
Install and integrate NMS software into Customer’s radio network Not Quoted Customize NMS alarm designations Not Quoted
Testing services:

Review and approve Aviat field acceptance test plan Customer Station test:

Perform grounding inspection Customer
Perform equipment inspection Customer
Hop test:

Perform antenna system test Aviat
Measure return loss and distance-to-fault of waveguide terminated at antenna within antenna frequency range
Aviat
Verify airtightness, by turning pressurization valve off for 4 hours and measuring pressure drop on each line (<0.5 PSI)
Aviat
Perform DC power system test Not Quoted
Measure charger floating/equalization voltages Not Quoted Measure voltages on each battery cell Not Quoted
Verify charger/battery switching Not Quoted
Perform microwave equipment test Aviat
Perform transmit power output test Aviat
Perform receive signal level test Aviat

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 18

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Perform receiver threshold (fade margin) test Aviat
Perform transmitter/receiver switching test Aviat
Perform Layer 1 link aggregation test Not Quoted
Perform Layer 2 link aggregation test Not Quoted
Perform adaptive modulation test Not Quoted
Perform Ethernet test Aviat
Perform AUX alarm/data card test Aviat
Perform channel bank test Customer
Verify VF continuity/level at 1KHz Customer
Verify operation of E/M signaling Customer
Perform multiplexer test Not Quoted
Perform IP phone test Not Quoted
Perform dehydrator test Aviat
Perform 1-hour BER test on primary radio and 1-hour BER test on standby radio Aviat System test:

Perform ring wrapping or Ethernet Ring Protection (ERP) tests Not Applicable Perform IP phone test Not Quoted
Perform network continuity test Not Applicable
Perform provision element manager test Not Quoted
Perform 12-hour BER test on primary side Aviat
Perform 12-hour BER test on standby side Aviat
Traffic/RF cutover:

Provide technical personnel familiar with existing equipment and cutover plan Customer Schedule cutover of all complete traffic immediately following installation Not Quoted Transfer circuit wiring Not Applicable
Verify integrity of circuits being cutover Not Quoted
Perform RF cutover Not Quoted
Perform traffic cutover Not Quoted
Final site acceptance procedure:

Notify all parties involved of site completion Aviat
Perform site installation inspection Customer
Complete indoor quality checklist Aviat
Complete tower quality checklist Aviat
Submit final punch list of all deficiencies to be corrected to Aviat Customer Identify all critical punch list items Customer
Review, agree and sign off on final punch list Aviat and Customer Sign off on Aviat Networks site installation checklist form Customer Final system acceptance procedure
Sign off on Aviat Networks field acceptance test results Customer Resolution of Customer vendor issues affecting completion or project Customer Sign off on Aviat Networks installation completion report Customer Sign off on project acceptance based on acceptance criteria of project Customer Issue final invoice for services upon acceptance of the system Aviat

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 19

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Provide as-built drawings for Aviat provided equipment Aviat Aviat Networks Installation, Integration, & Testing Deliverables Site Installation Completion Report Quality Checklists System Installation Completion Report Field Acceptance Test Report (completed) Punch List Completion Report As-built Record Sets Refer to Appendix F for further details regarding the installation, integration, and testing services.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 20

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

4. Equipment Decommission
Decommission Services
Tower Not Quoted
Antenna system (ICSO only) Aviat
Transmission line (ICSO only) Aviat
Pipe mount Not Quoted
Radio rack Not Quoted
DC charger rack Not Quoted
Battery Not Quoted
Leave decommissioned equipment at the site Not Quoted
Transport decommissioned equipment to customer warehouse Not Quoted Dispose decommissioned equipment Not Quoted

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 21

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

5. APPENDIX A: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Responsibilities
Aviat Networks will assign an Aviat representative to be the primary point of contact for this SOW (“Project Manager”) for the duration of the project. The Project Manager will work with CITY OF EL CENTRO to facilitate effective resource management, escalations, approval processes, scheduling, communication, and reporting with Aviat engineers and other designated vendors as needed. The Project Manager is responsible for maintaining control of the project and assuring compliance with the project and Customer specifications. Aviat Networks will not be responsible for the resolution of CITY OF EL CENTRO vendor issues affecting the completion of the project. Any documentation and standards not listed in this SOW will default to Aviat Networks standards, where applicable.

Although face-to-face communication and on-site meetings with CITY OF EL CENTRO are essential elements of the service, some activities that do not require face-to-face contact will be performed in the Project Manager’s Aviat Networks office in order to reduce travel and living costs. These activities are at the discretion of the Project Manager. Refer to section 2.1.2 for a full list of Project Management responsibilities.

Project Schedule
The project schedule for Aviat engineers, Aviat sub-contractors, and for CITY OF EL CENTRO’s supporting vendors will be developed (or updated if a schedule is included with this proposal) and maintained in Microsoft Project and will identify project deliverables, key milestones, resource assignments, and track project progress against each milestone. CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks agree to collaboratively review and agree to the project milestones and deliverable dates prior to the execution of any services on the project. A copy of the project schedule will be available upon request in .pdf or .mpp format.

It will be the responsibility of CITY OF EL CENTRO to track and deliver against all CITY OF EL CENTRO internal (including CITY OF EL CENTRO sub-contractors) milestones. The overall project plan generated by the Aviat Networks Project Manager will show major deliverable milestones, but not internal milestones of CITY OF EL CENTRO or their contractors. Tracking of CITY OF EL CENTRO and CITY OF EL CENTRO’s contractor internal milestones will remain the responsibility of the CITY OF EL CENTRO.

Communications Plan
Establishment of a communications plan will be done in accordance with the principles of project management established by the Project Management Institute (PMI®) unless otherwise agreed to. The plan will involve representatives from Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO and any other entities as mutually agreed between the parties for project kickoff meetings, periodic progress meetings, or problem escalations as needed. The plan will include the location and frequency of any such meetings, the format for formal communication and meeting minutes, attendee or distribution lists with contact details, methods of communication, and escalation and management level lists.

CITY OF EL CENTRO will make appropriate staff available for regular consultation and meetings with the Aviat Networks Project Manager. Customer’s failure to attend regular meetings or respond to Aviat Networks questions in a timely manner could result in a delay of the project deliverables and a billable change order.

Change Management Plan
Establishment of a change management plan will be done in accordance with the principles of project management established by the Project Management Institute (PMI®) and will include confirmation from Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO’s understanding of the process. Each party will work closely with the other to manage any scope changes through the term of the project and understand their impact on the project performance from a cost, quality, and schedule perspective. Any such change may be subject to a change order fee and will be communicated to CITY OF EL CENTRO prior to the implementation of the change. Any change order approvals will be submitted in writing. Refer to section 1.2 and Appendix B for more details on change orders.

Quality Standards and Procedures
Quality standards and procedures documents will be provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO prior to execution of this SOW. If no documentation is provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO prior to execution of this SOW, the standards and procedures will default to Aviat Networks best practices guide.

Resource Management Plan
Establishment of a resource management plan will be done in accordance with the principles of project management established by the Project Management Institute (PMI®), identifying principle team members by function, including backup resources (if required).

Closeout Activities
During the project closeout, all quality photos will be reviewed, completion documents will be signed with no exceptions, RMA completed, and final billing and invoicing released. It is recommended that CITY OF EL CENTRO provide Aviat Networks with performance feedback during this time to promote continuous improvement within Aviat Networks.

CITY OF EL CENTRO Responsibilities
CITY OF EL CENTRO shall:
• Provide details of CITY OF EL CENTRO’s principle team members by function during the project kickoff meeting.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 22

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
• Provide details of CITY OF EL CENTRO’s single point of contact for Aviat during the project kickoff meeting. • Provide all other relevant documentation or resources to assist in gathering information not stated in this SOW. • Provide access to sites, shelters, buildings, enclosures, facilities or any other areas as required. • Provide updates as necessary of any site readiness issues to be resolved prior to start of work. This includes, and is not limited to, permitting, leasing, zoning, insurance, etc. • Provide security clearances and/or escorts as required for field survey and installation activities. • Provide access to pertinent databases, planning requirements, including strategic plans, expansion scenarios, growth projections, introduction of new services and wireless technology.

Deliverables
Refer to section 2.1.3 for a full list of Aviat Networks project management deliverables.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 23

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

6. APPENDIX B: NETWORK ENGINEERING
Microwave System and Network Design
The Aviat Networks representative who oversees the network (“Network Engineer”) will provide the overall technical direction of the system design and will work with CITY OF EL CENTRO to insure system integrity, verify that all sub-systems and Aviat Networks furnished OEM equipment is compatible, and that the desired performance of the system is realized.

The network design portion of the project consists of three phases:

1. Preliminary design

2. Final design

3. Design freeze
Preliminary Design Phase
During the preliminary design phase, the Network Engineer will gather data to establish the design criteria and any special Customer requirements that need to be incorporated into the final design. The Network Engineer will review and translate the system configuration into specific hardware requirements. Equipment selection will be based on the requirements, input and requests from CITY OF EL CENTRO, functionality of the equipment, and recommendations from the Network Engineer. Aviat Networks will provide CITY OF EL CENTRO with a summary of the preliminary system design prior to commencing field surveys. All preliminary designs are subject to change. Changes can include, but are not limited to changes based on:
• Survey results.
• Vendor shortages or long lead times.
• Customer requests.
• Engineering recommendations.

Design Finalization Phase
After receipt of the order and the project kickoff meeting, Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO enter into the design finalization phase. During this phase, the Network Engineer will incorporate any required changes stemming from the path and/or site surveys into the design and confirm the final design details. Changes can include but not limited to:
• Antennas (types, sizes, models, quantities, and mounts). • Waveguide (types and lengths), waveguide accessories and dehydrators. • Power systems, cabling, and other material that could not be finalized prior to conducting the field surveys.

During this phase, CITY OF EL CENTRO may also request changes to the system design if the changes fall within the original scope and hours of the projects. Any changes outside of the original scope or agreed schedule are subject to review and acceptance by Aviat Networks to determine the impact and cost on the overall project.

Aviat Networks will provide a formal submission detailing the final system design and equipment list and highlight changes needed to the preliminary design. CITY OF EL CENTRO shall review the data and schedule a meeting, if necessary, to discuss any concerns.

If no concerns are noted, it is CITY OF EL CENTRO’s responsibility to approve the final design in writing (email is acceptable) before the design is frozen and equipment is placed on order (unless otherwise agreed to in this SOW or with the Project Manager). Any delay in the approval of the final design could result in a delay in material delivery to the field. This might require a review by CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks of the project schedule and deadlines.

Design Freeze Phase
As part of the Design Finalization Phase, a date will be set for the design freeze at which the final design and all changes must be approved and accepted by both parties. Following the design freeze, the Bill of Materials and documentation will be submitted to Aviat’s factory and the system will be scheduled for manufacturing. The Network Engineer will concurrently review all design documents and finalize any traffic plans, NMS plans, synchronization plans, traffic cutover requirements, as well as any special factory and field acceptance testing requirements for the project. During the Design Freeze Phase, the design is frozen and no further changes to the system design will be accepted without a formal change order and reevaluation of the project and delivery schedules. Refer to the project schedule for details on the planned start and finish dates for each of these phases.

Deliverables
Refer to section 2.2.3 for a full list of Aviat Networks design deliverables. • The equipment list refers to the final bill of material (“BOM”). • The design freeze package refers to the final path calculations, path profiles, rack profile and system drawings, traffic plans, IP plans, NMS plans, synchronization plans, and/or DC power calculations.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 24

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

7. APPENDIX C: TRANSMISSION ENGINEERING
Microwave Path Design
The Aviat Networks representative who oversees transmission (“Transmission Engineer”) ensures the delivery of the best possible network solution by providing the technical direction for the over-the-path RF performance of Aviat Networks system implementation.

All microwave paths designs are preliminary, pending final path surveys and frequency coordination. This includes:
• Antenna selections, antenna centerlines, and antenna mounts. • Total transmission line lengths.
• Path calculations and profiles.
• The size, type, quantity and configuration of each component.

Equipment proposals are simply a reflection of these preliminary designs and subject to change. It is further understood that any changes to existing or proposed antenna centerlines could justify the need for tower stress analysis or, if modification is impractical, construction of a new tower. Any such requirements will be the responsibility of CITY OF EL CENTRO unless otherwise stated in the Agreement.

In the event that CITY OF EL CENTRO elects not to use Aviat Networks to perform path surveys, the performance of the microwave system will not be guaranteed by Aviat Networks and it will be up to CITY OF EL CENTRO to resolve any path reliability or obstruction issues. Refer to the Warranty of Path Engineering Services section below for further detail.

In the event that Customer selects Aviat Networks to perform the path surveys, a formal submission detailing the results of the path survey and highlight changes needed to the preliminary design will be submitted to CITY OF EL CENTRO. It is expected that CITY OF EL CENTRO review the path survey data and schedule a meeting, if necessary, to discuss any concerns or alternate means of providing path continuity/system reliability. If no feedback is received from CITY OF EL CENTRO before the final system design approval, Aviat Networks will assume CITY OF EL CENTRO‘s acceptance of the survey data, and will immediately proceed with frequency coordination (if applicable).

Microwave Path Survey, Frequency Planning and Licensing The microwave path survey shall include the following services:
• Identify geographical location of sites and antenna, waveguide length and tower requirements. • Verify path clearance objectives for each of the paths from existing or new tower locations. • Document obstruction, critical points, and reflection points in each of the paths. • Verify tower coordinates and site elevations.
• Establish coordinates and height requirements for new towers, as needed for governmental agency registration and licenses filed by CITY OF EL CENTRO.
• Confirm antenna centerlines and waveguide length requirements. Catalog antennas on the existing structures noting any space limitations in the survey report. An Aviat engineer will review the tower for new antenna design space limitations specific to this project only but will not perform a complete tower audit. • Perform frequency coordination based on available FCC records to reduce the potential for interference between internal or external radio sources on a given system or network.
• Aviat Networks, upon receipt of CITY OF EL CENTRO’s authorization, will prepare the FCC License Application Form 601 with the appropriate technical data. Information such as site location, radio type, and frequency will be listed. Aviat Networks will complete and submit the Construction Complete Form 601 on line via FCC Universal Licensing System (“ULS”). • File Antenna Structure Registration (“ASR”) form for towers over 200 feet.

The results of the survey will be utilized by Aviat Networks for preparation of final performance calculations, frequency coordination, government licensing, and tower registration requirements. In the event where Aviat Networks will not be performing the path survey, CITY OF EL CENTRO shall provide all the documents needed for Aviat Networks to complete the frequency coordination, licensing, and final system design. Aviat Networks will not be held accountable for validating the accuracy of the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO and assumes no responsibility in any inaccuracies of any part of the path engineering based on the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO or any contact affiliated with CITY OF EL CENTRO. Any corrective action required as a result of this will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order.

Survey Procedures
Preliminary path profiles are drawn based on the supplied site coordinates and contour information extracted from the best available topographic mapping. A field site survey is conducted to verify site coordinates and elevations based on North American Datum 1983 (“NAD83”) and gather information related to the proposed radio equipment and antenna locations, site access, and site development constraints. A field path survey is then conducted to verify path profile elevations, measure all natural and manmade potential obstructions and assess the reflective potential of all natural and manmade surfaces. Antenna centerline heights were calculated for the proposed frequency band by applying suitable clearance criteria based on the propagation characteristics of the geographic area.

The path survey report is considered to be a representation of the information gathered in the field and as such, reflects a snap-shot in time at the time of the survey. It is not intended to show the final as-built configuration if any of the parameters were changed or updated after the survey report has been released.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 25

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Path calculation sheets are then generated for each hop, based upon the recommended centerline heights. Antenna sizes and the choice of propagation protection diversity are chosen to meet the required fade margin and the desired path propagation reliability.

Propagation outage and reliability calculations are based on the Vigants model (ref. “Space Diversity Engineering”, BSTJ, 1/75).

Design Criteria
Path clearance criteria must be established for each path on the basis of total system performance objectives, economic considerations, and careful analysis of local atmospheric conditions derived from published climatological data, where available, and reported microwave transmission experience pertinent to the area. Antenna heights much greater than actually needed cause an unwarranted increase in system cost, and on paths with significant ground reflections, this can increase the exposure to multipath and ground reflection signal fading. It is desirable to locate the antennas high enough so that even under severe super-standard atmospheric refractive conditions (surface ducting) there is adequate clearance such that signal entrapment does not significantly degrade the fade margin of the path or generate excessive multipath fade activity. The choice of clearance criteria for a microwave path is a balance between cost and performance.

The path clearance criterion as applied to a given geographic area is a function of the degree and direction of atmospheric beam bending and can conveniently be defined by the equivalent earth radius K factor:

Actual Earth s Radius
Effective Earth s Radius K
'
'
=
The median propagation value of K = 4/3 allows the normal microwave horizon to be slightly extended when compared to the optical horizon; however, under certain meteorological conditions (for example, during nighttime super-refractivity usually associated with temperature inversions) the value of K increases to 2 or greater for periods of several minutes to several hours. This increases the path clearance and results in the heavy multipath fade activity seen on some reflective paths and antenna decoupling power fading on others.

Clearance Criteria
The criteria used to design a radio path in regions where the C-factor is equal to or less than 1:
• Main to Main:
o 100% first Fresnel zone radius over K=4/3, or
o 60% first Fresnel zone radius over K=1, whichever is greater • Main to Diversity:
o 60% first Fresnel zone radius over K=4/3 (Not Applicable) The criteria used to design a radio path in regions where the C-factor is greater than 1:
• Main to Main:
o 100% first Fresnel zone radius over K=4/3, or
o 30% first Fresnel zone radius over K=2/3, whichever is greater • Main to Diversity:
o 60% first Fresnel zone radius over K=4/3 (Not Applicable) Microwave path performance calculations and warranties
The microwave path design models most frequently employed within the industry (e.g., Vigants, and ITU-R P-530) provide a reasonably accurate (and therefore usually guaranteed) estimate of the cumulative time a path will be out of service due to random atmospheric multipath fading under normal atmospheric conditions. These models do not (and cannot) accommodate abnormal, unusual, anomalous, or otherwise unpredictable conditions of weather or atmospheric refractivity.

Microwave frequency engineering/inter-system interference analysis Aviat Networks will partner with Comsearch, a CommScope company, to provide cost-effective frequency planning and FCC licensing services for radio communications systems (if required). The planning software used, considers specific operating parameters of both the proposed microwave system and the environment microwave systems (license and proposed) to properly consider the interference potential of the new path or system. Parameters and data elements incorporated into the modeling include, but are not limited to:
• Antenna type, antenna height, elevation, antenna radiation pattern • Receiver filter performance
• Terrain
• Radio modulation
• Path orientation
• Receiver threshold
These elements are required to accurately predict specific interfering levels into and from the existing microwave systems. The accuracy of the calculations is ensured by real-time maintenance of the Comsearch point-to-point microwave, earth station, radio equipment, antenna, interference objective, and contact database.

Microwave frequency selection

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 26

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
The interference analysis performed on the microwave system identifies available frequencies considering existing and proposed systems found in the Comsearch database. When applicable, an analysis of the systems in the adjacent bands can be done to ensure the microwave system does not receive unwanted threshold degradation. In bands shared with satellite systems, an analysis of potential interference with earth stations and with the geo-stationary satellite orbit can also be done. Additionally, co-located or nearby transmitters already licensed in the required frequency band can be identified in order to reduce the possibility of “bucking” an existing high/low frequency plan that could increase the possibility of receiver overload or reflective interference from a nearby system.

Microwave frequency coordination and FCC licensing
The majority of microwave bands subject to FCC Rule Part 101 require prior coordination with existing licensees. Aviat Networks will partner with Comsearch to perform the frequency coordination and FCC licensing on behalf of the Customer (if required). The procedure will include notification of the technical parameters of the proposed system to all existing and proposed licensees in the area and frequency band of operation. Frequency coordination will also be performed with Canadian and Mexican authorities in border areas when necessary. By FCC rule, recipients are given 30 days to respond, or in some cases an expedited response can be requested.

Upon completion of the prior coordination process, documentation required to satisfy FCC Rule Part 101.103 (d) can be prepared on behalf of the Customer. This will include any necessary exhibits, including supplemental showings required upon submittal of the requested license application. The FCC filing process includes:
• Filing of the FCC Form 601 microwave application upon written approval from Customer and providing an electronic copy of the application to Customer via email.
• Tracking the status of the application until the license is granted by the FCC. Amendments will be handled expeditiously on behalf of Customer for any questions or concerns from the FCC. • Email notifications to the licensee when the license is granted by the FCC. • Filing of the required completion of construction notification with the FCC upon written approval from the licensee and notification of the filing via email.

Special Considerations
On all microwave radio paths traversing urban areas there exists the possibility of multiple on- and off-path structural reflections which generate long-delayed echoes, as well as terrain scatter RF intra- and inter-system interference. Long delayed, low-level echoes have no effect on digital radio performance; however, the terrain scatter mechanism cannot be accurately predicted nor precisely measured without an extensive and expensive field trial. Consequently, this mechanism is specifically excluded from all current industry-wide path survey and frequency coordination performance guarantees.

The structure supporting the microwave antenna can take many forms. The antenna is most often mounted on a tower but can be mounted on a variety of structures such as roof tripods, penthouse wall, wooden telephone pole, or metal monopole. It is recommended that Customer conduct a structural analysis of the support structure to determine if the structure will support the additional loading imposed by the antenna and its mount. The structure must also meet the twist and sway requirements per EIA/ANSI 222G.

Site Access
Access to work sites will be made available by CITY OF EL CENTRO for a minimum of 10 hours per day, 5 days per week or per the agreed schedule in the project plan. All roads leading to work sites shall not require more than a 4-wheel drive vehicle unless stated otherwise and agreed to by both CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks. Any delays or additional cost caused by poor road conditions or site access issues not discussed prior to the start of the surveys will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order and could have a negative impact on the project completion schedule.

FCC Rules for Filing Accuracy
CFR 47, Part 1.929 specifies that filing accuracy for site coordinates shall be (+/-) 1” latitude and longitude, and for ground elevation (+/-) 1 meter (3.28 ft.). Part 1.929(k) (covering modification of FCC licenses) specifies that any change in site coordinates >5” latitude or longitude shall require prior authorization and re-coordination. Therefore, wherever our survey results deviate more than (+/-) 5” latitude or longitude, or more than +3.28 ft. site elevation, frequency re-coordination will be recommended.

Terms and Conditions
When Aviat Networks performs reliability calculations or path studies (path profiles from mapping or digitized data only) based solely on information supplied by or on behalf of the Customer, these calculations and studies are provided solely for budgetary purposes and shall not be construed as or be used for an installable design.

When conducting a path survey, Aviat Networks will verify site coordinates and ground elevations, and record trees and man-made fixed obstructions on the path. This information will be recorded on the profile for that particular path. Aviat Networks will assign an appropriate growth factor to tree heights.

When Aviat Networks performs frequency planning based, in part or its totality, on data provided by the Customer at the time of the study, Aviat Networks will not be responsible for any interference case that might arise due to errors or omissions in such data. As the usage of microwave bands increase and there is more sharing with satellite services, it may be necessary to perform frequency

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 27

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
interference studies and additional path surveys (to determine blockage) to alleviate the possibility of interference from satellite earth stations.

Warranty of Path Engineering Services
Aviat Networks warrants that the installed radio communication path will conform to Customer’s multipath performance reliability objectives when Aviat Networks has performed the path survey, recommended the path design, and implemented such recommendations. This warranty is for a period of fifteen (15) months from the date of the survey or one (1) year from the date of installation of the microwave path, whichever expires first. All Aviat Networks field activities and path propagation analysis will utilize current hardware, software, engineering practices and judgment with the goal of meeting normal Path Loss, as defined in TIA/EIA Standard RS-252-A.

Aviat Networks is not responsible for paths that it does not survey, nor for changes in path design beyond those specifically allowed in the path survey report or in writing after the field survey is completed, including but not limited to:
• Any change in path design;
• Any movement in site locations;
• Any building or other structure built on-path after date of survey; • Any disturbance of the terrain which may cause blockage or reflection; • Any additional frequency interference source;
• Any change of available antenna mounting space on tower.

Any one of these changes listed will nullify the warranty, and the Customer shall in such case bear the total cost of determining that such change was the cause.

Aviat Networks will not be responsible for degraded path performance when such degradation is due to such anomalous propagation conditions as:
• Long-term loss of fade margin due to antenna decoupling misalignment caused by widely-varying k-factor changes; • Long-term loss of fade margin due to atmospheric boundary layering (“ABL”) causing wave front defocusing (beam spreading), signal entrapment (blackout fading), ducting, and other such occurrence. • Excessive rain outage rates beyond the published crane and/or chart data used in the calculation; • Degradation resulting from certain types of multipath interference attributed to unidentifiable off-path terrain features or structures; • Any other technological or atmospheric condition not foreseeable through the exercise of prudent engineering knowledge and judgment.

Additionally, Aviat Networks will not be responsible for degraded path performance when:
• Non-Aviat Networks radio equipment is installed on a surveyed path; • Aviat Networks radio equipment is not installed by Aviat Networks; • Existing antenna and waveguide system is used without test and inspection performed by Aviat Networks.

Aviat Networks designs the microwave path based upon engineering practices and standards common to the industry. When path loss or reliability objectives are not achieved, Customer’s sole remedy, and Aviat Networks’ exclusive liability in connection with path engineering, shall be that Aviat Networks will provide incremental labor and material to optimize the antenna system to meet the requirements created during initial installation.

Where anomalous propagation is suspected in an installed microwave path, Aviat Networks will work with the Customer to obtain reasonable evidence that such condition exists. The total retroactive costs for such study shall be the responsibility of the Customer, and Aviat Networks will provide in-office engineering support at Customer’s expense. The cost of relocating towers, antennas, passive reflectors, or other measures required to remedy this type of problem shall solely be the responsibility of the Customer.

Deliverables
Refer to section 2.3.3 for a full list of Aviat Networks path design deliverables.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 28

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Limitations
THE LIMITED WARRANTY CONTAINED IN THIS SOW CONSTITUTES AVIAT NETWORKS’ SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE LIABILITY HEREUNDER AND CUSTOMER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR DEFECTIVE OR NON-CONFORMING EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, AND SOFTWARE MEDIA OR LICENSED PROGRAMS. THE FOREGOING WARRANTIES ARE IN LIEU OF ALL

OTHER WARRANTIES (EXCEPT AS TO TITLE), WHETHER ORAL, WRITTEN, EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY,

INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF MERCHANTABILITY, ANY IMPLIED

WARRANTY OR CONDITION OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY OR CONDITION ARISING OUT OF COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE, OR CUSTOM OR USAGE OF TRADE. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT NO CIRCUMSTANCE CAUSING CUSTOMER’S EXCLUSIVE AND LIMITED REMEDIES TO FAIL IN THEIR ESSENTIAL PURPOSE SHALL INCREASE OR EXTEND ANY AVIAT NETWORKS WARRANTY. THE TOTAL LIABILITY OF AVIAT

NETWORKS AND ITS LICENSORS UNDER THIS WARRANTY SHALL IN ANY EVENT BE SUBJECT TO THE LIMITATIONS IN THIS SOW.

ANY WARRANTY CLAIM NOT SENT TO AVIAT NETWORKS IN WRITING DURING THE APPLICABLE WARRANTY PERIOD IS WAIVED BY CUSTOMER. REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT, SERVICES, SOFTWARE MEDIA AND LICENSED AVIAT NETWORKS

PROGRAMS ARE WARRANTED ONLY FOR THE BALANCE OF THE UNEXPIRED PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL WARRANTY PERIOD, IF ANY.

CUSTOMER IS EXPRESSLY NOTIFIED THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL AVIAT NETWORKS BE LIABLE FOR (A)

ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY PARTY, INCLUDING THIRD

PARTIES, EVEN IF SUCH DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE, OR (B) LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF

BUSINESS, LOSS OF USE, LOST SAVINGS, OR LOST OR CORRUPTED DATA, OR (C) LOSSES RESULTING FROM SYSTEM

SHUTDOWN, FAILURE TO ACCURATELY TRANSFER, READ OR TRANSMIT INFORMATION, FAILURE TO UPDATE OR

PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION, SYSTEM INCOMPATIBILITY OR PROVIDING INCORRECT COMPATIBILITY

INFORMATION OR BREACHES IN SYSTEM SECURITY EVEN IF AVIAT NETWORKS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. THIS LIMITATION SHALL APPLY TO ANY CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR BREACH OF WARRANTY).

IN NO EVENT SHALL AVIAT NETWORKS’ TOTAL LIABILITY TO CUSTOMER OR ANY PARTY CLAIMING THROUGH CUSTOMER EXCEED THE LESSER OF ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ($100,000.00 USD) OR THE

ACTUAL SALES PRICE PAID BY CUSTOMER FOR ANY EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE OR SERVICES SUPPLIED UNDER THIS SOW.

THIS SECTION SHALL SURVIVE THE TERM OR EXPIRATION OF THE AGREEMENT. CUSTOMER AGREES TO INDEMNIFY,

DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS AVIAT NETWORKS AGAINST ALL LOSS OR LIABILITY FROM CLAIMS BY CUSTOMER OR A THIRD PARTY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO CUSTOMER’S INSTALLATION, OPERATION, OR MISUSE OF THE EQUIPMENT OR LICENSED PROGRAMS, WHETHER ON ACCOUNT OF NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 29

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

8. APPENDIX D: PROJECT ENGINEERING
Microwave Site Design
The Aviat representative overseeing implementation (“Project Engineer”) will perform field site surveys to verify that telecommunications equipment can be installed, powered and commissioned effectively at each site, antennas, waveguide and accessories can be connected to radios (towers, shelters and buildings), and Customer traffic, alarms and dehydrator lines are fully engineered.

Microwave Site Survey
The microwave site survey is intended to gather data and identify the gap(s) between the site’s present state and the site readiness for equipment installation, document any visible issue with the existing infrastructure and equipment that would pose a quality or safety issue during installation, gather environmental data and requirements for telecommunication equipment to function properly (including but not limited to HVAC, temperature, humidity, the general state of the facility as well as seismic evaluation and compliance if required), record flooring, ceiling, racking data and requirements to mount new equipment (including floor plans, relay rack profiles, aisle numbering plans, and ceiling hangers, ladders, and anchor materials required to meet quality and safety standards.

The survey is also intended to record AC, DC, grounding (as is and to be), and breaker assignments and ensure power and grounding standards are met, identify demarcation types and location between new and existing equipment as well as the type of termination and the details required to terminate to the Customer provided equipment, identify existing radio equipment (fixed and mobile) as well as their operating frequencies, record existing waveguide, dehydrator component and their associated cabling, identify all required or existing tower structures, mounting structures, antenna mounting types, waveguide ladder systems, entryway into telecom shelters, and energy sources.

The results of the survey will be published and released in a site survey report and will be utilized by Aviat Networks for preparation of final power calculations, waveguide requirements, field OEM requirements, installation specifications, field test plans, and traffic cutover plans. In the event where Aviat Networks will not be performing the site survey, CITY OF EL CENTRO shall provide all the documents needed to Aviat Networks to complete the site engineering and final system design. Aviat Networks will not be responsible for validating the accuracy of the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO and assumes no responsibility in any inaccuracies of any part of the site engineering and microwave site design when such design is based on the information provided by CITY OF EL CENTRO or any contact affiliated with CITY OF EL CENTRO. Any corrective action required as a result of this will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order.

Site Access
Access to work sites will be made available by CITY OF EL CENTRO for a minimum of 10 hours per day, 5 days per week or per the agreed schedule in the project plan. All roads leading to work sites shall not require more than a 4-wheel drive vehicle unless stated otherwise in this SOW and agreed to by both CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks. Any delays or additional cost caused by poor road conditions or site access issues not discussed prior to the start of the surveys will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order and may have a negative impact on the project completion schedule.

Field Installation Management
Aviat Networks will manage the day-to-day activities of the field installation with support from CITY OF EL CENTRO to ensure the project remains on schedule as per the agreed project schedule.

Deliverables
Refer to section 2.4.3 for a full list of Aviat Networks site design deliverables.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 30

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

9. APPENDIX E: INSTALLATION, INTEGRATION & TESTING
The installation, integration, and testing services include design-supported methodologies, product expertise, and field-proven processes to help ensure a quality installation and testing of critical system paths and hardware so that the network performs according to its design. Aviat Networks will designate a primary point of contact to answer any CITY OF EL CENTRO questions, provide guidance, and address issues specific to this service.

This SOW is based on an Aviat Networks standard installation schedule of 10-hour days, 5 days per week. Aviat Networks will adjust this SOW for work week schedules outside of Aviat Networks’ standard. Installation work performed during maintenance windows is not included in this SOW unless specifically identified. All work will be done in accordance with Aviat Networks’ best practices guide.

Scope
Delivery of this service will utilize the design documentation developed as part of the planning and design phase. Field crews will utilize this documentation to:
• Install antenna systems
• Install transmission lines
• Install indoor microwave equipment, racks and components • Perform antenna alignment
• Perform system integration
• Perform system testing
System implementation is predicated upon completion of civil construction and complete site readiness. Antenna, waveguide and equipment installation activities will be performed at the same time on a per-site basis. As part of the delivery of this service, Aviat Networks may choose to integrate equipment at the manufacturer’s location to minimize onsite installation time and provide a common point for quality assurance inspections. If staging areas are utilized as part of the project, equipment and materials will be delivered from these facilities to site by the installation crews. It is recommended that CITY OF EL CENTRO provide maintenance technicians during any service affecting work.

The successful completion of all installation, integration, and testing services are based on uninterrupted, contiguous-site installation and testing. Additional mobilizations are not included in the pricing and project schedule. If installation is delayed due to inclement weather, inaccessible sites(s), incomplete site preparation, or construction, the following charges may apply and will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order:
• Standby time for antenna installation teams will be charged at a rate of $950 per person per day. • Standby time for radio teams will be charged at a rate of $1,250 per person per day. • If re-mobilization of the installation crew is necessary, then a two-week advance notice is required. • Re-mobilization will be billed on a time-and-expenses basis. • Service costing assumes use of 4-wheel drive vehicles for all project related vehicles. Additional requirements such as ATVs may require additional service costs.
• If the field crew(s) is required to work out of contiguous sequence due to conditions beyond the control of Aviat Networks, a charge equal to one day for each crew person will be assessed to the Customer for each occurrence.

Site Access
Access to work sites will be made available by CITY OF EL CENTRO for a minimum of 10 hours per day, 5 days per week or per the agreed schedule in the project plan. All roads leading to work sites shall not require more than a 4-wheel drive vehicle unless stated otherwise is this SOW and agreed to by both CITY OF EL CENTRO and Aviat Networks. Any delays or additional cost caused by poor road conditions or site access issues not discussed prior to the start of the installation, integration or testing services will be billed to CITY OF EL CENTRO as a billable change order and could have a negative impact on the project completion schedule.

Site Services
All work permits, public agency approvals, leasing agreements, zoning permits or inspections required at each site, soil analysis, foundation design, civil documentation for existing shelters or towers, architectural blueprints, plot plans, structural analysis for new or existing antenna systems, location of all site boundaries and features (including locating and marking tower location, true North, property boundaries, paved areas, landscaping, fences and any other underground/overhead obstruction which could interfere with construction and access), and/or other related documentation for this project will be obtained, conducted, completed and made available to all parties involved prior to the start of any installation, integration or testing services. All other construction and installation work will be conducted in accordance with local city, county, state, and government laws and regulations.

All equipment including radios, antennas and racks will be stored by Customer in a secure location at the site or at a designated location. CITY OF EL CENTRO shall be responsible for the loss of any equipment, tools, or personal belongings from any secured location provided or monitored by CITY OF EL CENTRO.

Installation

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 31

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
CITY OF EL CENTRO shall verify that each site is ready for installation and commissioning activities, including CITY OF EL CENTRO supplied equipment installation and power up prior to the start of any such services and shall be responsible for any delay caused or cost incurred due to sites not being ready, as stated in the project scope of this SOW.

An inspection will be performed with CITY OF EL CENTRO after completing the physical installation. Workmanship deficiencies will be noted on a punch list for immediate correction. This inspection is not intended to verify operation of the new system or suitability of components, but rather to inventory and document that all equipment and materials from the schedule of values are installed to acceptable workmanship quality standards. Site drawings will be reviewed and red-lined to reflect the installed condition.

Testing
Test crews will begin work immediately after installation is complete. Testing, based on a standard set of Aviat Network test cases, will be performed on all provided equipment to confirm configuration, operation and manufacturer’s specifications. Test data will be recorded on field test sheets, by technical field personnel who will also be responsible for documenting test results and any changes made to the design documentation.

The test crews will be trained on the equipment and utilize test equipment to perform all tests. Test equipment will have valid calibration certifications, which can be verified prior to commencing any tests. It is recommended that CITY OF EL CENTRO take the opportunity to have their maintenance technicians witness or participate in field commissioning testing to gain on-the-job training and experience on the new system components.

Commissioning tests will consist of a set of standard Aviat Networks test cases and include turn-up and performance verification tests and circuit tests to verify end-to-end continuity and equipment operation as well as any other tests documented in the field acceptance test plan. The field acceptance test plan shall be approved and agreed to by Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO prior to test execution. Test results will be recorded on field test data sheets and submitted to CITY OF EL CENTRO. Refer to the field acceptance test document for details on the test to be performed.

System tests will be performed on a logical section/loop of the system. The system tests will be designed to demonstrate performance and functionality of system features as-well as end-to-end operation of individual circuits/services. System test results will establish benchmark system performance and operation prior to cut-over and acceptance. The test data sheets prepared during commissioning and system testing will become the base line document for maintenance and performance evaluation of the system over an extended period of time. CITY OF EL CENTRO will be required to review the commissioning and acceptance testing and results and red-lined drawings and provide approval of the data and authorization to proceed with cut-over activities.

Traffic Cut-over
All cut-over activities will be the responsibility of CITY OF EL CENTRO Safety
The health and safety of all individuals, whether in the field, plant or office, takes precedence over all other concerns. Management's goal is to prevent accidents and to reduce personal injury and occupational illness and comply with all safety and health standards. A code of safe conduct is important to the efficiency of operations. To the greatest degree possible, CITY OF EL CENTRO will provide physical safeguards required for personal safety and health in keeping with the highest standards. Aviat Networks requires a written report from Customer for all accidents and incidents, no matter how small.

Safety and first aid material and supplies will be provided to all Aviat Network construction and installation personnel or made available at each site for the duration of this project. All safety and first aid material will be stocked at acceptable levels and will have not exceeded the expiration dates where applicable. CITY OF EL CENTRO will be responsible for providing Aviat Networks with the location and phone numbers of all local emergency agencies.

Deliverables
Refer to section 4.5 for a full list of Aviat Networks installation, integration, & testing deliverables.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 32

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

10.APPENDIX F: ASSUMPTIONS & EXCLUSIONS
The following assumptions will govern the delivery of the project management service:
• This SOW and associated pricing is based on CITY OF EL CENTRO completing all items set forth in this SOW as being CITY OF EL CENTRO responsibility to ensure site readiness. • Any inaccuracies in FCC data may drive additional services costs during field implementation. In addition, any other troubleshooting tasks related to frequency interference issues that are not directly attributable to Aviat Networks are subject to additional service fees at rates define in this SOW. • All equipment interconnections or termination points, unless specified otherwise, are estimated to be fifty (50) feet. This project does not include any cabling between buildings, rooms, or floors, unless specifically identified in this SOW. • Customer provided construction drawings will have sufficient details for Aviat engineering to order antenna mounting or any other related material required. Any re-engineering to provide correct mounts or material required by Aviat Networks may increase cost to CITY OF EL CENTRO.

Unless otherwise stated in this SOW, the services provided by Aviat in this SOW shall be subject to the following terms:
• Aviat shall not be responsibility for managing CITY OF EL CENTRO project responsibilities and deliverables. • This SOW is a listing of roles and responsibilities to be provided by Aviat Networks. Aviat Networks shall not be responsible for the condition of existing equipment or the deficiencies of non-Aviat Networks provided labor. Only the labor addressed in this SOW shall be provided by Aviat Networks. • On-site technicians will decline any CITY OF EL CENTRO request for work outside the scope of work defined and agreed upon in this SOW unless it is addressed in a change order. • Aviat Networks proprietary documentation used by service delivery teams to perform this service is not available to CITY OF EL CENTRO.
• Aviat shall not provide proprietary information on methods, procedures, or tools to perform the services in this SOW. • Aviat shall not perform any and services that are not specifically described within this SOW as being provided by Aviat Networks.
• Aviat Networks will not be responsible for the resolution of other vendor issues affecting the completion of the cutover.

Aviat Networks can provide guidance and support to CITY OF EL CENTRO in resolving interoperability issues, where applicable.
• Aviat shall not repair equipment not in the engineering drawings. Equipment requiring repair that is not included in the engineering drawings but is still under warranty must follow Aviat’s repair and return procedures. • Additions or changes to ironwork, cable racks, or fiber ducts are not included and can be quoted separately after site visit information is collected
• AC power drop wiring within three (3) feet of DC power plants is excluded, unless specifically quoted

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 33

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

11.APPENDIX G: FIELD CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURE
Any change to the proposed system configuration, the number of sites, type of equipment, type of services or project responsibilities, or any other change to this SOW will be considered as a change in scope and will be subject to the following process:
• The Customer or Aviat Networks identifies a change of project scope of work. • Aviat Networks Project Manager or Network Engineer will submit a proposed field change order authorization or an amendment to this SOW containing documentation of the proposed additional activity and an additional cost. • An authorized Customer representative shall review and approve the field change order authorization or the amendment to this SOW in writing prior to changes to the scope of work being started.

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 34

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
860 N McCarthy Blvd., Suite 200
Milpitas, CA 95035
408-941-7100

CHANGE ORDER FORM

CITY OF EL CENTRO
El Centro PD Relocation
NA220510-75600
This amendment hereby modifies and amends the Statement of Work (“SOW”) between Aviat, U.S., Inc. (“Aviat Networks”) and CITY OF EL CENTRO (“Customer”) entered into on [insert SOW effective date here] as follows:

The following products and services are hereby <added/deleted> to the SOW at the specified prices. All other terms and conditions of the SOW remain unchanged.

Customer: CITY OF EL CENTRO Contract #:

Phone: Contract Date:

Fax: Change Order #:

Email: Aviat SO #:

Line
#
Description QTY
+/(-)
Unit Price Ext Price
+/(-)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 Subtotal Booking $
Tax (as applicable) $
Freight $
Other $
TOTAL THIS CHANGE $
Aviat U.S., Inc. CITY OF EL CENTRO
Approved By: Approved By:

Print Name: Print Name:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 35

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

12.STATEMENT OF WORK SIGN-OFF

CITY OF EL CENTRO
El Centro PD Relocation
NA220510-75600
Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO agree that this SOW will govern the scope, roles, and responsibilities associated with the delivery of this project.

The parties also agree that material changes to the project scope or deviations from the assignment of responsibilities between Aviat Networks and CITY OF EL CENTRO shall require a change order or amendment to the project schedule.

Aviat U.S., Inc. CITY OF EL CENTRO
Approved By: Approved By:

Print Name: Print Name:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 36

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

13.PROJECT COMPLETION SIGN-OFF
Complete one page for every site.

CITY OF EL CENTRO
El Centro PD Relocation
NA220510-75600
<Site Name>
Equipment:

The Aviat Networks supplied microwave equipment has been completely installed and tested and has been accepted for traffic use with the following exceptions:

Exceptions (use additional sheets if required):

Please call Aviat’s customer service hotline at 1-800-227-8332 for service, equipment repair, training or miscellaneous sales or visit Aviat’s customer service website at http://www.aviatnetworks.com.

Aviat U.S., Inc. CITY OF EL CENTRO
Approved By: Approved By:

Print Name: Print Name:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 37

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

14.Aviat Standard Drawings
Synch Plan

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 38

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS
Ethernet Ring Protection plan (ERP)

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 39

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 40

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 41

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

Please consider the environment before printing this document. Page 42

STATEMENT OF WORK

AVIAT NETWORKS

Project Number : NA220510-75600
Project Date : 11/1/2024
Aviat U.S., Inc. Issue No : C
200 Parker Drive, Suite C100A Territory Manager : Homer Decano Austin, TX 78728 System Engineer : James Ma
Sales Engineer : Joveth Manese
Company Pegasus Telecommunications Consulting Group Terms : NET 30 Attn Mel Samples Delivery : 7-9 Wks ARO
Address [email protected] Expiration : 7/2/2025 Currency : USD
Freight : Prepaid and Bill, Destination
El Centro PD Relocation
ODU600 / 18GHZ 40 MHz / MHSB 1+1 Aviat Networks Confidential and Proprietary Information

EQUIPMENT LIST PRODUCT CODE UNIT SYSTEM

ITEM DESCRIPTION PART NUMBER PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE QTY PRICE

1.0000 Radio Equipment
18GHz - ODU600 Radio

1.0010 ODU 600v2, 18 GHZ, PLANNING PART NUMBER M-ECH-18 $2,760 4 $11,040 2 $5,520 2 $5,520

1.0020 Coupler Assy ODU 600v2 , 18 GHz Unequal 6 dB, V and H Pole (840D618H1B) 086-523300-186 $229 2 $458 1 $229 1 $229

1.1000 INU Intelligent Node Unit

1.1010 ECLIPSE, INTELLIGENT NODE UNIT 2RU, INC IDCE, FAN, NCCV3, HIGH OUTPUT EXX-000-205 $928 2 $1,856 1 $928 1 $928

1.1020 NODE PROTECTION CARD, HIGH OUTPUT EXS-002 $206 2 $412 1 $206 1 $206

1.1030 KIT BRACKET 2RU (179-530064-001 R001) 179-530064-001 $7 2 $14 1 $7 1 $7 Rac Modem Card

1.1040 RAC 70v2, QPSK-4096QAM, NO XPIC, ACM EXR-700-002 $747 4 $2,988 2 $1,494 2 $1,494 Ethernet Switch Card

1.1050 DAC GE3 GIGABIT ETHERNET SWITCH CARD EXD-181-002 $652 4 $2,608 2 $1,304 2 $1,304

1.1060 CABLE PROT / BRIDGEING GE3, DIRECT FIT, 1M (VAHS-30-0342 REV X2) 037-579461-001 $37 2 $74 1 $37 1 $37

1.1070 XCVR ELECTRICAL SFP, GE3 ONLY, W/LOS 3V3 COM (ABCU-5730RZ) 083-845434-001 $30 4 $120 2 $60 2 $60

1.1080 GIG ETH SFP, OPT SMF 1310nm LC 1000BASE-LX, <10 KM (FTM-3012C-SLG) 079-422656-001 $20 4 $80 2 $40 2 $40

1.1090 SPLITTER SM LC-LC TO LC 2M 037-579143-001 $15 8 $120 4 $60 4 $60 Aux/Alarm Card

1.1100 AUX, ALARM I/O CARD EXA-001 $181 2 $362 1 $181 1 $181

1.1200 CABLE, ALARM I/O HD15 TO WIREWRAP, 15M (037-579470-015V REVX1) 037-579470-015 $51 2 $102 1 $51 1 $51 SW Licences

1.1210 NODE SW LICENSE, 400 Mbps TOTAL RADIO PAYLOAD CAPACITY EZE-08006 $2,900 2 $5,800 1 $2,900 1 $2,900

1.1220 SECURE MANGEMENT, INU, inc SNMPV3 NODAL EZF-03 $900 2 $1,800 1 $900 1 $900

1.1230 RADIUS CLIENT, NODAL CENTRALIZED USER ACCT MGMT EZF-06 $337 2 $674 1 $337 1 $337

1.1240 ADAPTIVE MODULATION NODAL RAC60/6X/60E/6XE/70 EZF-02 $1,125 2 $2,250 1 $1,125 1 $1,125

1.2000 Rack and Accessories

1.2010 RACK ASSY CRATED, 7'-6" CHATSWORTH ALUMINUM, 1 BREAKER PNL W/10 BLANK COVERS AND NO BREAKERS 179-530307-0114 $1,431 2 $2,862 1 $1,431 1 $1,431

1.2020 GROUND BAR,KIT,RACK,R56 COMPLIANT,72 INCHES L X 5/8 INCHES WIDE X 1/4 INCHES DEPTH (TRGBVKIT145872AWA) LOC-TRGBVKIT145872W $539 2 $1,078 1 $539 1 $539

1.2030 CHANNEL MOUNTING, FORWARD, U-SHAPE, 4 INCHES LONG (FORWARD) X 5/8 INCHES WIDE X 1.75 INCHES HIGH (1 RU) 020-018475-005 $19 6 $114 3 $57 3 $57

1.2040 STANDARD DC AND GND KIT (AV179-530118-001WA) 179-530118-001 $428 2 $856 1 $428 1 $428

1.2050 COMMON BREAKERS & BLANKING PLUGS PER RACK PER DRAWING COMMON-BREAKERS-RACK $65 2 $130 1 $65 1 $65

1.2060 SIPQ-CABLES SIPQ-CABLES 2 1 1

1.3000 66 Block (OPTIONAL Not Include on the Total)

1.3010 M66 Punch-Down BlOCk Kit 179-530132-001 $34

1.3020 BLOCK MOUNTING BAR 19", RACK MOUNTED, BLK (30013-700) LOC-30013-700 $86

1.3030 66 PUNCH BLOCK FOR 64C ASE-0661-200 $334

1.4000 Asentria SiteBoss (OPTIONAL Not Include on the Total)

1.4010 S550-6/32M/DC, S550 W/6 EXPSLT; 32MB; -48VDC; SLOTS 1-6:EMPTY ASE-S556/3D $2,676

1.4020 64 Dry Contact Closures (high-density, includes "Y" interconnect cable, -64C) ASE-64C $562

1.4030 EXPANSION CARD, 4 X VOLTAGE INPUTS, 4 X +5VDC POWER OUTPUTS ASE-4VP5 $202

1.4040 EXPANSION CARD, 4 X VOLTAGE INPUTS, 4 X +/-15VDC POWER OUTPUTS ASE-4VP $202

1.4050 CABLE, SCSI TO DUAL AMPHENOL, 25 FEET, FOR 64C AND 32C8V8R EXPANSION CARDS ASE-2060-405 $227

1.4060 Amphenol Extension Cable, 10' M-F 25 LS(2060-051) $71 Sub Total Radio Equipment $35,798 $17,899 $17,899

2.0000 Antenna Systems

2.1000 11 GHz Antennas
ANTENNA, 10/11 GHZ, 0.6 M (2FT), VALULINE, HPLP (RECTANGULAR AND CIRCULAR INTERFACE), DIRECT MOUNT, DISH (STD: WHITE),

10.0 -11.7 GHZ, RADOME (STD: GRAY), CLASS III/FCC101A/B, WTM4K AND ODU600V2, 252 KMPH, 180 KMPH (VHLP2-11W-GTU) AND-VHLP2-11W-GTU $490 1 $490 1 $490

2.1010 ANTENNA, 10/11 GHZ, 0.9 M (3FT), VALULINE, HPLP (RECTANGULAR AND CIRCULAR INTERFACE), DIRECT MOUNT, DISH (STD: WHITE),

10.125-11.7 GHZ, RADOME (STD: GRAY), CLASS III/FCC101A/B, WTM4K AND ODU600V2, 250 KMPH, 180 KMPH (VHLP3-11W-GTU) AND-VHLP3-11W-GTU $1,102 1 $1,102 1 $1,102

2.1011 STRUT, INBOARD SIDE KIT FOR 3 FT, 4 FT AND 6 FT COMMSCOPE MICROWAVE ANTENNAS (VSTRUT-P3KIT) 086-000011-002 $179 1 $179 1 $179

2.2000 IF Cable and Accessories

2.2010 COAX CABLE FOR CNT 400, BRAIDED, FIRE RETARDANT, 50 OHM, BLACK PE JACKET, 300M (CNT-400-FR-300M) AND-CNT-400-FR-300M $1,319 1 $1,319 1 $1,319

2.2020 CABLE, IDU/ODU, NO CONN, 75M, .4IN 840-600311-075 $188 3 $564 2 $376 1 $188

2.2030 LIGHTNING ARRESTOR KIT, UNIVERSAL, 50 OHM, TYPE N, FEMALE TO FEMALE 179-530062-001 $116 4 $464 2 $232 2 $232

2.2040 WEATHERPROOFING KIT 011-390001-001 $3 4 $12 2 $6 2 $6

2.2050 TYPE N MALE CRIMP CONNECTORS 840-600202-001 $7 24 $168 12 $84 12 $84

2.2060 HOISTING GRIP, FOR 3/8 INCH CNT-400 COAXIAL CABLE (C2SGRIP) AND-C2SGRIP $8 4 $32 2 $16 2 $16

2.2070 MINIATURE CLICK-ON HANGER FOR 9-12 MM (BHD-38) 179-530160-007 $10 28 $280 12 $120 16 $160

2.2080 ADAPTER, ANGLE, SS, FOR MINI CLICK-ON HANGAERS (10/PK) (294572) 179-530160-005 $37 28 $1,036 12 $444 16 $592

2.2090 HARDWARE, SNGL STACK, SS, FOR MINI CLICK -ON HANGERS (10/PK) (252027-10KT-P) AND-252027-10KT-P $25 28 $700 12 $300 16 $400

2.2100 GROUNDING KIT, UNIVERSAL, 1/4" TO 5/8" CABLES 179-530509-001 $12 12 $144 6 $72 6 $72

2.2110 ENTRY BOOT, KIT, LMR-400, 4", 2-HOLE (BALR42) VLT-BALR42 $37 4 $148 2 $74 2 $74 Sub Total Antenna Systems $6,638 $3,005 $3,633

3.0000 Power System

3.0010 INTERGRATED POWER SYSTEM, 2RU, 48V, BATTERY BACKUP, ALARM CONTACTS, OUTPUT 54.4VDC, 11AMPS (IPS-48-11) ABS-HBC300-A/48FTS-19-S5846 $699 2 $1,398 2 $1,398 Sub Total Power System $1,398 $1,398

4.0000 Spares

4.0010 ODU 600v2, 18 GHZ, PLANNING PART NUMBER M-ECH-18 $2,760 2 $5,520 2 $5,520

4.0020 ECLIPSE, INTELLIGENT NODE UNIT 2RU, INC IDCE, FAN, NCCV3, HIGH OUTPUT EXX-000-205 $928 1 $928 1 $928

4.0030 NODE PROTECTION CARD, HIGH OUTPUT EXS-002 $206 1 $206 1 $206

4.0040 RAC 70v2, QPSK-4096QAM, NO XPIC, ACM EXR-700-002 $579 1 $579 1 $579

4.0050 DAC GE3 GIGABIT ETHERNET SWITCH CARD EXD-181-002 $652 1 $652 1 $652

4.0060 AUX, ALARM I/O CARD EXA-001 $181 1 $181 1 $181

4.0070 Spare CF Card with 50 Mbps Node radio capacity Licence EZE-08001 $87 1 $87 1 $87 Sub Total Spares $8,153 $8,153

5.0000 Services

5.1000 System Equipment Services Prices

5.1010 RADIO INTEGRATION SVCS-IN-SIPQ-RI $2,028 1 $2,028 1 $2,028

5.1020 CONFIG ENG / DOCUMENTATION / DRAFTING SVCS-IN-SS-CEDFT $2,006 1 $2,006 1 $2,006

5.2000 Installation

5.2010 ANTENNA SYS INSTALLATION - Includes Antenna Pipe Mounts on both Sites SVCS-IN-IC-AS $31,808 1 $31,808 1 $31,808

5.2020 FIELD RADIO INSTALLATION - Testing and Provision Integration SVCS-IN-IC-FI $14,745 1 $14,745 1 $14,745

5.2030 Decom of legacy equipment SVCS-IN-IC-FI $2,700 1 $2,700 1 $2,700

5.3000 System Engineering

5.3010 NETWORK/SYSTEM ENGINEERING (Per Hour) SVCS-PN-EN-SE $129 21 $2,709 21 $2,709

5.3020 FCC coordination - 1st frequency pair per hop SVCS-PN-EN-XE-LA $1,702 1 $1,702 1 $1,702

5.3030 FCC License Preparation - Per site location SVCS-PN-EN-XE-LA $542 2 $1,084 2 $1,084

5.3040 Mobilization/demobilization and expenses for Site Survey (Project Engineer) SVCS-IN-SS-PE $2,717 1 $2,717 1 $2,717

5.3050 Site Survey(s) and report SVCS-IN-SS-PE $1,144 2 $2,288 2 $2,288

5.3060 Field living expenses per calendar day SVCS-IN-SS-PE $429 1 $429 1 $429

5.3070 Path Survey and Report - (Includes Mob/Demob and expenses) SVCS-PN-EN-XE $6,745 1 $6,745 1 $6,745

5.4000 Project Management

5.4010 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (Per Hour) SVCS-IN-PM-PM $140 46 $6,440 46 $6,440

5.4020 PROJECT/SITE ENGINEERING (Per Hour) SVCS-IN-SS-PE $135 33 $4,455 33 $4,455

5.5000 3 years Warranty

5.5010 WARRANTY PLUS IW- NA&C, 36 MONTHS, ODU-600 SNA-BWXXA1003643 $283 4 $1,132 4 $1,132

5.6000 4 Years Extended Warranty

5.6010 ODU600 Warranty/Maintenance for Year 4, Per TR SNA-BNWXA1001243 $244 4 $976 4 $976

5.6020 ODU600 Warranty/Maintenance for Year 5, Per TR SNA-BNWXA1001243 $244 4 $976 4 $976

5.6030 ODU600 Warranty/Maintenance for Year 6, Per TR SNA-BNWXA1001243 $244 4 $976 4 $976

5.6040 ODU600 Warranty/Maintenance for Year 7, Per TR SNA-BNWXA1001243 $244 4 $976 4 $976 Sub Total Services $86,892 $86,892
Total (Excluding Applicable Taxes and Freight) $138,879 $20,904 $21,532 $8,153 $86,892

6.0000 Estimated Freight - San Diego County,CA

6.0010 Estimated Freight - San Diego County,CA FREIGHT $3,380 1 $3,380 1 $3,380

7.0000 TAX

7.0010 Estimates Sales Tax - 7.5% TAX-CSV $3,853 1 $3,853 1 $3,853 Grand Total (Including Applicable Taxes and Freight) $146,112 $20,904 $21,532 $8,153 $86,892 $3,853 $3,380 ICSO El Centro Spares Services Estimated Tax Freight
1/28/2025 - 9:06 AM
Quote - 1 of 1
Exhibit B

City Council of the City of El Centro
1275 W. Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243

SUBMITTED
ACTION ITEM (ID # 2025-21)
Item: 3.

Meeting: 2/4/2025 4:00 PM
Department: City Clerk
Category: Action Item
Prepared by: Norma Wyles, City Clerk
Department Head: Norma Wyles
DOC ID: 2025-21
Approval of City Council meeting minutes of January 21, 2025.

CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:

Approval of the City Council meeting minutes of January 21, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKES, INSURANCE, ETC.:

N/A
BACKGROUND:

N/A
DISCUSSION:

N/A
CONCLUSION:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 01-21-2025 Regular CC Minutes

Book 37

REGULAR MEETING

EL CENTRO CITY COUNCIL

CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1275 MAIN STREET, EL CENTRO, CA
TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2025, 4:00 P.M.

The El Centro City Council met in a regular session on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 4:05 p.m. in Conference Room A, El Centro City Hall, 1275 W. Main Street, El Centro, California for the purpose of closed session.

PRESENT: Council: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena City Clerk Wyles, Interim City Manager Paramo, City Attorney Martyn Evans

CLOSED SESSION PUBLIC COMMENT
None

CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION
Moved by Marroquin, second by Carter, to adjourn into closed session for:

Closed Session Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54957
Public Employment
Non-Interim City Manager
Closed Session Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.8 – Closed Session with Negotiators Regarding Real Property Transactions.

Property Address: 1415 Ross Avenue and related properties Negotiating with: IVHD and UCSD representatives
Under Negotiations: Terms and Conditions
Closed Session Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(b)(2) – potential litigation against the City.

Motion unanimously carried.

Closed Session concluded at 5:50 p.m. (all present)
City Council recessed to 6:00 p.m.

OPEN SESSION
The El Centro City Council met in a regular session on Tuesday, January 21, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, El Centro City Hall, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, California.

PRESENT: Council: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena City Clerk Wyles, Interim City Manager Paramo, City Attorney Martyn Evans Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America was led by Council Member Camarena and Invocation was given by Mayor Pro-Tem Carter.

Book 37

CITY ATTORNEY REORT ON CLOSED SESSION:

None
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

No public comments were received.

CONSENT AGENDA (ITEMS 1-7):

Moved by Marroquin, second by Carter, approving consent items (# 1-7).

1. Approval of Warrant Registers for the Month of December 2024.

2. Approval of Payroll Registers for the Month of December 2024.

3. Approval of Treasurer’s Report for the Month of December 2024.

4. Approval of city council minutes of December 3, 2024, December 9, 2024, December 12, 2024, December 13, 2024, December 17, 2024, December 20, 2024 and January 7, 2025.

5. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-01, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE

EL CENTRO POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ACCEPT THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $10,123.

6. Approval of Award of Task Order to Nicklaus Engineering, Inc. for Engineering Services related to the TAG Grant Alleyway Improvement Project.

7. Approval of PD Project for Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC Contract Amendment No. 1.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
*Items #15 was taken out of order*
DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION:

15. Sidewalk trip hazard reduction efforts presentation. Presentation only.

NEW BUSINESS:

8. Presentation by Dulce Bedolla, Human Resource Director, appointment of Interim City Manager.

Moved by Carter, second by Marroquin, adoption of Resolution No. 25-02, RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY OF EL CENTRO ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYMENT TERMS FOR DANIEL PARAMO TO FILL THE POSITION OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER.

AYES: Carter, Oliva, Marroquin
NOES: Ellett
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: Camarena

Book 37

9. Presentation by Abraham Campos, Public Works Director/City Engineer, approval of Change Order 3 to Rove Engineering related to the Southern Pump Station Project. Council members had questions regarding this change order. Mr. Campos addressed all the questions.

Moved by Marroquin, second by Ellett, authorize budget as requested and authorize Change Order 3 to Rove Engineering as presented.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

10. Presentation by Adriana Nava, Community Services Director, approval of resolutions to update the designated individual authorized to execute the following for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program: the program applications, the PLHA Standard Agreement, any subsequent amendments or modifications to the agreement, and any other related documents.

Moved by Carter, second by Marroquin, adoption of Resolution No. 25-03, CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA – AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA – AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION AND AMENDING THE PLHA PLAN FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION PROGRAM.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

11. Presentation by Adriana Nava, Community Services Director, approval of resolutions to update the designated individual authorized to execute the following for the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) Program: the program applications, the PLHA Standard Agreement, any subsequent amendments or modifications to the agreement, and any other related documents.

Moved by Marroquin, second by Camarena, adoption of Resolution No. 25-04, CITY OF EL CENTRO,

COLONIAS, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

EL CENTRO COLONIAS, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION AND AMENDING THE PLHA PLAN FOR THE PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCATION PROGRAM.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

12. Presentation by Mayor Oliva, appointment of a Delegate and Alternate representatives for SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments).

Moved by Marroquin, second by Camarena, appointment of Delegate: Mayor Tomás Oliva; and Alternate: Mayor Pro-Tem Sonia Carter, as the SCAG representatives.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

Book 37

13. Authorization for Mayor Oliva to write a letter to IID requesting a presentation (or town hall meetings) regarding the proposed rate increases.

Moved by Ellett, second by Carter, authorize the mayor to write a letter to IID, requesting a presentation (or town hall meetings) regarding proposed rate increases, with a full explanation of the increases and the need.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

14. Moved Carter, second by Camarena, adoption of Resolution No. 25-05, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO, CALIFORNIA, REVISING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

Public comment was received by Peter Rodriguez.

AYES: Ellett, Carter, Oliva, Marroquin, Camarena
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None

DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION

15. * Item taken out of order.

LEGISLATIVE
None

TASK FORCE AND MAYOR & COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS
Mayor and Council Members reported on their activities since last City Council meeting and upcoming events.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
Reported on activities.

ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m. __________________________
Norma Wyles, City Clerk
APPROVED BY:
________________________________
Tomás Oliva, Mayor

City Council of the City of El Centro
1275 W. Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243

SUBMITTED
ACTION ITEM (ID # 2024-234)
Item: 4.

Meeting: 2/4/2025 4:00 PM
Department: Community Development
Category: Resolution
Prepared by: Angel Hernandez,
Community Development Director
Department Head: Angel Hernandez
DOC ID: 2024-234
Public hearing to consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map.

CITY MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 25- , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO EIR 05-05.

PROJECT: Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map, consisting of an approximately 38- acre site north of McCabe Road, generally located west of South 4th Street (Highway 86) and 630 feet south of Horne Road.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not Applicable
STRATEGIC PLANNING PROGRAM 2022-2027 RELATION:

Environmental Sustainability & Infrastructure
Economic Opportunity
DUE DILIGENCE CHECK FOR CONTRACTORS/CONSULTANTS: DID THE

DEPARTMENT VERIFY CURRENT EL CENTRO BUSINESS LICENSE,
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE, REFERENCE CHECKES, INSURANCE, ETC.:

Not Applicable
BACKGROUND:

In 2007, the El Centro City Council approved several entitlements for the Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map project. The proposal included a 131-lot single-family subdivision on approximately 38 acres of land adjacent to the southern city limits, within unincorporated county territory. However, due to market conditions and changes in property ownership, the project was never initiated, nor was the site annexed into the City of El Centro.

In 2022, Martin D. Coyne of Willow Bend Homes, LLC submitted an application to amend the existing Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM) and its associated conditions of approval.

The proposed amendments include modifications to the subdivision layout, a reduction in the number of single-family lots from 131 to 120, and revisions to conditions related to roadway improvements near the project site. A summary of these changes is provided in Attachment A – Conditions of Approval Changes. Many of the amended conditions pertain to the construction and funding of traffic improvements.

When the project was initially reviewed before 2007, several large developments were planned, which were expected to significantly impact the roadway network. However, those projects never materialized, and the anticipated demand did not occur. Additionally,

the City and other agencies have since implemented various infrastructure improvements, including lane additions and restriping.

The project’s Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2005101128), approved in 2007, requires an addendum to evaluate the proposed changes and ensure compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State CEQA Guidelines (Attachment B – EIR Addendum). RECON Environmental and Linscott, Law & Greenspan were commissioned to assist in preparing the EIR addendum and updating transportation impact studies. The addendum concluded that the proposed modifications would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantially increase the severity of previously identified impacts.

On December 10, 2024, the project was presented to the Planning Commission during a duly noticed public hearing. Following review, the Commission unanimously adopted a resolution recommending approval of the project.

DISCUSSION:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
The Willow Bend project proposes the development of 120 single-family homes, a 1.37- acre park, and a 1.4-acre retention basin on approximately 38 acres. The project site is located north of McCabe Road, west of South 4th Street (Highway 86), and 630 feet south of Horne Road, adjacent to the southern city limits. The site, identified as APN 054-370- 012, is currently used for agricultural purposes and is surrounded by residential developments to the north and east, with agricultural land to the west and south. The proposed tentative subdivision map is included as Attachment C.

Project approval would require the following actions by the City Council:
• Approval of the Addendum to the 2007 EIR (SCH#205101128). • Approval of amendments to the 2007 conditions of approval for the Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map.
• Approval of Pre-Zoning the project site to R-1 Single-Family Residential. • Approval of annexation into the City of El Centro.

Additionally, the project requires approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission to annex the property into the City of El Centro. A map of the project site and its vicinity is below.

The subject property is designated as Low-Density Residential under the General Plan and would be pre-zoned to R-1 Single-Family Residential, allowing for the development of detached single-family homes at densities consistent with the proposed project. The site serves as a transitional area between agricultural uses to the west and south and established residential neighborhoods to the north and east. SR-86 (S. 4th Street) borders the project to the east, while the Date Drain runs along the north and west.

Proposed Zoning Map
General Plan Land Use Map
Vicinity Land Use Designation Zoning Current use
Subject Property Low Density Residential Pre-Zoned to R-1 Single Family Residential
Agricultural Land
North Rural Residential Not in City Limits Single Family Homes East Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family
Residential
Single Family Homes
South Low Density Residential Not in City Limits Agricultural Land West Low Density Residential Not in City Limits Agricultural Land in

Preliminary Annexation
Process

ANALYSIS
Zoning and Land Use - The proposed amendments are consistent with applicable land use policies and development regulations. The modifications reduce potential environmental impacts by lowering residential density and remain within the thresholds identified in the 2007 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The revised project aligns with the City’s objectives of promoting sustainable, livable, and well-integrated residential communities.

Homes will be constructed on lots no smaller than 6,000 square feet, will be single-story, and will include garages and landscaped front yards. The subdivision design ensures compatibility with surrounding residential land uses by maintaining a low-density character and incorporating design elements that blend seamlessly with adjacent neighborhoods. Meandering sidewalks and landscaping will enhance pedestrian connectivity and match the aesthetic of the neighboring Countryside Subdivision to the east.

Water and Sewer - Water and sewer services will be extended from existing City infrastructure along SR-86. Water service will connect via 12-inch mains located on Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive. Interior water distribution will adhere to city standards and will allow for future westward expansion. Sanitary sewer will connect to an existing lift station at Willow Bend Drive and SR-86, and be designed to connect to the Southern Lift Station improvement project currently under construction. A new 15-inch sewer line will be installed along Carl Street to facilitate future development south of the site. Additionally, the sewer line along Countryside Drive will be designed to accommodate future growth to the west. Improvements are consistent with the City's water and sewer master plans.

Stormwater Management - A retention basin will be installed on the northern boundary, connecting to the Date Drain. Stormwater will be conveyed via surface flow and underground drainage pipes. The basin will not be open to the public and will be secured with a wrought iron fence.

Date Drain - The current conditions of approval required undergrounding the Date Drain and installing a linear park over it. The amended conditions allow the drain to remain open while securing it from vehicle access using a three-rail wooden fence along S. Sixth Street. This fence permits maintenance by the Imperial Irrigation District while deterring public access. A section of the drain will be pipelined to accommodate the crossing of Countryside Drive to the west. As this crossing is City-wide in significance, facilitating future roadway development and sewer and water expansion, staff recommends a reimbursement agreement of approximately $325,000 between the City and the applicant to fund this system-wide improvement.

Transportation and Circulation - Access to the subdivision will be provided by two entrances from 4th Street (SR-86). Countryside Drive will provide full access to the subdivision, allowing full turning movements for vehicles entering and exiting the project site. Willow Bend Drive will provide limited access with turning movements restricted to right-in/right-out movements only. All interior roadways, except Countryside Drive, will be designed as local roadways. Countryside Drive is designated as a two-lane arterial and will eventually provide east-west connectivity between 4th Street and 8th Street.

Improvements to Countryside Drive include two travel lanes, parking lanes, a landscaped parkway, and a crossing over the Date Drain bounding the site to the west. All roads will built to design standards as denoted in the Mobility Element of the General Plan.

A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was conducted in July 2006 for the 2007 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) by Katz, Okitsu & Associates, which identified no significant transportation or traffic impacts but included nine conditions of approval to address nearby intersections and roadway segments. These conditions required fair-share contributions or construction of improvements such as roadway widening, turn lanes, and signalization. In 2024, a subsequent review by LLG reevaluated these conditions based on updated traffic forecasts and near-term operating conditions.

The updated analysis concluded that several of the original conditions, including payments of fair-share

fees for roadway widening, additional turn lanes, and signalization at various SR-86 intersections, were unnecessary due to acceptable levels of service under near-term conditions. Specific improvements, such as the widening of SR-86 between I-8 and Wake Avenue, additional lanes at the SR-86/I-8 ramps, and various turn lane modifications, were deemed unnecessary. Further improvements include the widening of 4th Street (SR-86) along the project frontage and modifications at the intersections of SR86 and Countryside Drive and Willow Bend Drive. Improvements to the intersection of 4th Street (SR86) and Countryside Drive will occur before the issuance of the 60th certificate of occupancy, with all conditioned improvements limited to the project frontage.

A Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Study for SR-86/Countryside Drive, based on 2045 traffic forecasts, identified both a roundabout and an all-way stop as feasible configurations, replacing the condition requiring a traffic signal, pending review and approval by Caltrans at a later date. The revised recommendations ensure that necessary improvements align with current and projected traffic needs, maintain compliance with applicable standards, and avoid imposing excessive or redundant mitigation measures. The modifications to the conditions of approval do not introduce new or more severe traffic impacts than those identified in the 2007 Final EIR, ensuring the project remains consistent with the City’s. (See Attachment D - Transportation Impact Studies) Parks - The amended project is proposing a centrally located park. The developer would be responsible to construct and dedicate a 1.37 acre park to the City. Park improvements include a multi-use grass field, park lighting, hard surface ball court, and playground area. The park would prior to the completion of 50% of the lots.

Aesthetics - The proposed amendments to the Willow Bend Subdivision enhance the project's aesthetic integration with the surrounding environment through the inclusion of a 1.37-acre centrally located park, which provides visual relief and serves as a unifying design element. The updated subdivision layout ensures compatibility with adjacent land uses, maintaining a cohesive visual transition between residential and agricultural areas. The incorporation of landscaping, streetscape enhancements, and retention basin design complies with the City’s development standards. This includes requiring landscaping along frontages of 4th Street, and street side yards of the subdivision.

Maintenance will be conducted as part of a Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District that will be established for the site. Wrought iron fencing will also be installed along the street frontages of the proposed retention basin.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND PUBLIC NOTICING
Public Noticing - This project requires a public hearing before the City Council to approve the proposed changes to the Tentative Subdivision Map, Amendments to revise and update conditions, and the addendum to the 2007 EIR. A public hearing notice was published in the Imperial Valley Press, a newspaper of general circulation, and mailed to all property owners within a 500 foot radius on January 15, 2025. As of the date of preparation of this staff report, no comments or questions were received by staff.

Environmental Review - The original Environmental Impact Report for this project was approved on February 7, 2007. The amendment to the 2007 Willow Bend Project necessitated an addendum to the original Environmental Impact Report which does not require recirculation of the report. As such this project has been deemed by the Planning Director to be in compliance with CEQA requirements.

FINDINGS
Tentative subdivision map - The Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map amendments have been reviewed by staff and the required findings of approval are outlined below:

1. The proposed map is consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The proposed Willow Bend Subdivision is consistent with the City of El Centro General Plan, as it aligns with the Low-Density Residential designation by developing single-family homes at an appropriate density while incorporating open space and recreational amenities. The project also supports the General Plan's goals for orderly growth, infrastructure connectivity, and compatibility with surrounding land uses, ensuring cohesive and sustainable community development.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan.

The design and improvements of the proposed Willow Bend Subdivision are consistent with the City of El Centro General Plan by incorporating a central park, meandering sidewalks, and landscaped streetscapes that align with the plan's emphasis on creating livable and visually cohesive residential neighborhoods.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The 38-acre site is relatively flat and currently in agricultural use, with no known topographical, geological, or environmental constraints that would preclude the construction of single-family homes. Additionally, the site’s proximity to existing infrastructure, including water, sewer, and road connections, ensures its capacity to support the proposed residential development in compliance with City standards and General Plan policies.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Willow Bend subdivision is designed with a density consistent with the Low-Density Residential designation in the City of El Centro General Plan and the site’s R-1 Single-Family Residential zoning. The proposed reduction to 120 single-family units further ensures compatibility with the surrounding land uses and infrastructure capacity, maintaining the appropriate balance between housing development and open space to align with the City’s vision for orderly and sustainable growth.

5. The design of the subdivision of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

The project site is currently in agricultural use and is surrounded by residential and agricultural development, with no identified sensitive habitats or species within the project area. The environmental analysis conducted in the 2007 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) determined that potential impacts to biological resources were less than significant, and the proposed amendments do not introduce new or more severe impacts. Compliance with applicable mitigation measures and regulatory requirements further ensures the protection of environmental resources.

6. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The project complies with the City of El Centro’s General Plan, zoning regulations, and the current California Building Code, ensuring that infrastructure, utilities, and residential construction meet all safety and health standards. Additionally, the 2007 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) concluded that the project would not result in significant public health impacts, and the proposed amendments do not introduce new or increased risks.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All public easements for utilities, drainage, and access have been incorporated into the subdivision's design to ensure continuity and compliance with applicable regulations. The project will maintain existing public rights-of-way and provide necessary roadway improvements, such as connections to SR-86 and Countryside Drive, to support public access and circulation consistent with City standards and the 2007 Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Zone Change (Pre-Zone) - The Willow Bend subdivision is proposed to be pre-zoned to R-1 Single Family Residential subject to successful completion of the annexation. The following are the required findings for approval:

1. The proposed amendment or zone change shall be in conformity with the general plan map and text, and other development policies of the city.

The proposed Willow Bend subdivision has been previously designated in the General Plan as Low Density Residential. Pre-zoning the project site to R1- Single-Family Residential would be consistent with the general plan map and text, and other development policies of the city.

2. The proposed amendment or zone change is appropriate for the property or properties which will be affected by such action, with consideration given to access, size of parcel(s), relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations deemed relevant by the commission and council.

The proposed pre-zone is appropriate for the property. The project is planned to have proper access, proper utilities, and will have lot sizes consistent with the R-1 Zoning Ordinance. The Willow Bend will be consistent with other single family residential subdivisions in the area such as the Countryside Subdivision to the east and the Buena Vista Subdivision to the west.

3. The proposed amendment or zone change is necessary and property at this time and is not likely to be detrimental to property or residents affected by such action.

The proposed pre-zone is necessary to be designated at this time and is not likely to be detrimental to the property affected in order to ensure the property is properly zoned when the annexation is properly completed and recognized.

CONCLUSION:

Adopt Resolution 25- ,A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CENTRO ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO EIR 05-05.

PROJECT: Willow Bend Tentative Subdivision Map, consisting of approximately 38-acre site north of McCabe Road, generally located west of South 4th Street (Highway 86) and 630 feet south of Horne Road.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Attachment A- Proposed Amendments

2. Attachment B - EIR Addendum

3. Attachment C - Tentative Subdivision Map

4. Attachment D - Traffic Impact Studies

5. Attachment E - Resolution

Original Condition Proposed Condition
1 The project shall include the development of a maximum of 134 single-family residential lots with average minimum of lot sizes of 7,200 square feet. The residences located on lots 129-134 shall be limited to a single story.

The project shall include the development of a maximum of 120 singlefamily residential lots with an average minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet.

Comments: The condition was modified due to a reduction in the number lots proposed by the applicant.
2 Building permits shall not be issued for any new construction related to the project until verification from the elementary and high school districts is received, certifying that the State mandated school impact mitigation fees have been paid or addressed as otherwise provided or authorized by law.

Building permits shall not be issued for any construction related to the project until verification from the elementary and high school districts is received, certifying that the State mandated school impact mitigation fees have been paid or addressed as otherwise provided or authorized by law.

Comments: No changes.
3 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.9%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee(TIF), towards the provision of a westbound right-turn lane and a second northbound left-turn lane at the westbound ramp of Highway 86 and Interstate 8.

Removed
Comments: Since the project was first approved, a westbound rightturn lane was constructed. This condition may be removed as a traffic study determined the level of service at the intersection is acceptable without the construction of a second northbound left-turn lane. 4 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment(4.6%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound leftturn lane at the eastbound ramp of Highway 86 and Interstate 8.

Removed
Comments: This condition may be removed as a traffic study determined the level of service at the intersection is acceptable without the construction two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound left-turn lane.
5 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.7%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the construction of a second eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Highway 86 and Wake Avenue.

Removed
Comments: The second eastbound turn lane was installed by the City of El Centro in 2024.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
6 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall construct a raised median for full turning movement with southbound acceleration and deceleration lanes with a left turn in pocket and left turn at Highway 86 and Horne Road. (as per attached Exhibit A-1), subject to a credit for other traffic impact fees or reimbursement from other benefited projects in the area, at the City's option.

Removed
Comments: The traffic study determined levels of service would be acceptable and the condition to construct the raised median and reconfigure the lane may be removed.
7 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (13.8%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the construction of a right turn in/right turn out island from Willow Bend Drive at Highway 86.

Removed
Comments: The condition may be removed since a median island was already installed that restricts turning movements to right turn in/right turn out for the project’s access/egress.
8 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair share payment (1.5%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the signalization of the Highway 86 and west McCabe Road intersection as well as the provision of a dedicated eastbound and westbound left turn pockets.

Removed
Comments: Since the project was first approved in 2007 the intersection has been signalized. The condition may be removed since the traffic study determined levels of service would be acceptable, without the installation of dedicated eastbound and westbound turn pockets.
9 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair share payment (5.6%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between Wake Avenue and Interstate 8 to six lanes.

Removed
Comments: This condition was removed as acceptable levels of service were calculated under near term conditions. Furthermore, Condition 10 now includes the widening of SR-86 (4th Street) to four-lane arterial standards along the property frontage consistent with the General Plan.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
10 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (2. 7%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between McCabe Road and the project site to four lanes along the project frontage.

Prior to the recording of the first final map, the applicant shall complete or provide security for the widening of Highway 86 (4th Street) to a four-lane right-of-way width along the project frontage prior to recording of the first final map.

The widening, including any required deceleration and acceleration lanes north and south of the development frontage, shall be completed prior to the issuance of the 60th certificate of occupancy, as determined by the approved Caltrans transportation study or other Caltrans requirements.

The No. 2 southbound lane shall merge into the No. 1 southbound lane such that the Countryside Drive and Highway 86 intersection transitions to a single southbound lane at the intersection.

Comments: Traffic analysis of this segment determined that widening may be removed from the project access between Countryside Drive and McCabe Road. Widening is still required between Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive. The modification was required to provide additional detail of the work provided and a timeframe of when improvements should be completed.
11 Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (5. 7%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between Danenberg Drive and Wake Avenue to four lanes.

Removed
Comments: This condition has been removed as the traffic study calculated acceptable levels of service under near-term conditions without widening SR-86.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
12 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall signalize the Highway 86 and Countryside intersection.

Prior to the issuance of the 1st certificate of occupancy, and contingent upon approval by Caltrans, the applicant shall complete improvements to the intersection at Highway 86(4th Street) and Countryside Drive to provide full directional access to the development. Final intersection improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the results of the Caltrans transportation study and shall be completed no later than the issuance of the 60th certificate of occupancy, or as determined by the approved Caltrans Transportation Study.

Comments: Highway 86 (4th Street) is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans and requires additional review to determine the final intersection design. The modification was required to provide alternatives to the intersection design and a timeframe of when improvements should be completed.
13 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide construction contracts which specify that all construction equipment shall be equipped with mufflers and other suitable noise attenuation devices.

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide construction contracts to the Community Development Director that specify that all construction equipment shall be equipped with mufflers and other suitable noise attenuation devices.

Comments: No changes.
14 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall notify residents within 100 feet of the project site regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. All notices shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints.

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall notify residents within 100 feet of the project’s site regarding the construction schedule of the proposed project. All notices shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints.

Comments: No changes.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
15 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall erect a sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet, posted at the construction site. The sign shall indicate the dates and duration of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where residents can inquire about
the construction process and register complaints.

Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall erect a sign, legible at a distance of 50 feet, posted at the construction site. The sign shall indicate the dates and durations of construction activities, as well as provide a telephone number where residents can inquire about the construction process and register complaints.

Comments: No changes.
16 Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall be required to enter into an agreement with the City for the payment of a fair share cost to mitigate the operation and maintenance impacts to fire and police services caused by the approval of the project. The description of the security for the agreement and the method of payment shall be included in the agreement.

The applicant agrees to pay standard Police and Fire Impact fees as part of building permit issuance unless deferred as approved by the City of El Centro.

Comments: This condition was modified to allow for the payment of impact fees to be deferred, consistent with City's development impact and capacity fee deferral program.
17 Prior to the first final inspection, the existing Date Drain abutting the western boundary of the project site shall be pipelined, undergrounded and landscaped in accordance with the
specifications of the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). In addition, the private delivery canal located along the southern boundary of the project site shall be removed.

Access to the Date Drain by the public shall be secured with a four-foot high three rail wood fence along the western project site boundary.

Fencing shall be installed prior to the completion of Grass Street/6th Street. The applicant shall coordinate with the Imperial Irrigation District for maintenance access requirements.

Comments: The modification to this condition is needed as the requirement to underground the Date Drain is no longer needed.

Additional details on how to control public access are included in the modified condition.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
18 Prior to the issuance of building permits, a trunk sewer line shall be provided along the eastern boundary of the project adjacent to Highway 86 (outside Caltrans' right-of-way) extending to the southern boundary, as per city standards.

Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, a trunk sewer line shall be installed on Carl Street to connect to the existing lift station at Highway 86 (4th Street) and Willow Bend Drive. The trunk sewer line may be constructed within the right-of-way within the development (Carl Street) or adjacent to Highway 86 (4th Street). The Countryside Drive sewer line shall be sized and placed to allow connection from the development at the west. The developer shall be reimbursed for any additional costs incurred due to upsizing by the development to the west.

Comments: The modification provides an alternative route for the trunk sewer line and also requires the upsizing Countryside Drive sewer line to accommodate future development to the west. 19 A six (6') foot high solid decorative block/masonry or stucco wall shall be provided along the eastern boundary of lots 1-14 and 129, the western boundary of lots 32 and 134, and the northern boundary of lots 129-134.

A six (6) foot high solid decorative block/masonry wall shall be provided along the western Highway 86 right-of-way line (eastern boundary of lots 1-14) and along the property lines abutting the park (eastern boundary of lots 81 and 72 and western boundary of lots 82 and 71). A vinyl or composite fencing shall be installed along the southern project boundary (southern boundary of lots 14-32 and western boundary of lot 32).

Comments: The modification was required as the original tentative subdivision map's lot numbers have change. It also provides alternative fencing material for certain areas of the subdivision. 20 The proposed storm water retention basin for the project site shall be developed in accordance with the City's design standards for retention basins.

The proposed stormwater retention basin for the project site shall be developed in accordance with the City’s design standard for retention basins. This requires a wrought iron fence with pilasters along the perimeter of the basin abutting and visible from the public right of way.

Comments: The modification provides more detail for design standards of the retention basin.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
21 Prior to the close of the sale of the thirteenth lot, applicant shall establish a Lighting/Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District for the project in order to pay for the maintenance of any lighting, landscaping, and Park/Recreation facilities, including graffiti abatement, within the public right-of-way, IID easements, retention basin, park and multi-use trail.

Prior to the issuance of the thirteenth certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall establish a Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District (LLMD) for the project. The LLMD shall pay for the maintenance of any lighting, landscaping, park, and recreation facilities, including graffiti abatement, within the public right-of-way, IID easement, retention basin and the park.

Comments: Modifications to this condition were incorporated to provide a timeline of when the LLMD needed to be established. 22 Prior to grading permit, the applicant and City of El Centro shall be required to conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 30 days-prior to ground disturbing activity to ensure that owl burrows have not become established within the impact area.

Should a burrowing owl move into the area prior to construction then mitigation should consist of passive relocation with a oneway door to avoid direct impacts to any burrowing owl on site.

Passive relocation should be conducted during the non-breeding season (Sep 1-Jan 31) to ensure active nests are not lost as a result of owl exclusion. The methodology for owl relocation should follow the guidelines set forth in the CDFG Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.

Prior to the grading permit, the applicant and the City of El Centro shall be required to conduct a preconstruction survey no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbing activity to ensure that owl burrows have not become established within the impact area. Should a burrowing owl move into the area prior to construction then mitigation should consist of passive relocation within a one-way door to avoid direct impacts to any burrowing owl on site. Passive relocation should be conducted during the non-breeding season (Sep.1-Jan.31) to ensure active nests are not lost as results of owl exclusion. The methodology for owl relocation should follow the guidelines set forth in the CDFG Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.

Comments: No changes.
23 In the event of the discovery of buried cultural resources, project activities in the vicinity of the resources shall be temporarily halted. A qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to assess the significance of the resource and to provide proper management recommendations (e.g., resource avoidance or data recovery excavations).

In the event of the discovery of buried cultural resources, project activities in the vicinity of the resources shall be temporarily halted. A qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to access the significance of the resource and to provide proper management recommendations (e.g., resource avoidance or data recovery excavation).

Comments: No changes.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
24 Prior to issuance of building permit and during construction, if human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98.

The County Coroner shall be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner shall notify the NAHC, which would determine and notify and Most Likely Descendent (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials.

Prior to issuance of building permit and during construction, if human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner shall be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner shall notify the NAHC, which determine and notify and Most Likely Descendent (MLD). With the permission of the landowner of his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human and items associated with Native American burials.

Comments: No changes.
25 The project shall be required to comply with regional rules, including the ICAPCD Rule VIII - Fugitive Dust Rules as well as ICAPCD CEQA Handbook Measures for Construction equipment and Fugitive PM10 control, that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. Applicable dust suppression techniques are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques will reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM10 component).

The project shall be required to comply with regional rules, including the ICAPCD Rule VIII - Fugitive Dust Rules as well as ICAPCD CEQA Handbook Measures for Construction equipment and Fugitive PM10 control, that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions.

Applicable dust suppression techniques are summarized below.

Implementation of these dust suppression technique will reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM 10 component).

Comments: No changes.
26 The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with right-of-way acquisition, if necessary. In the event the acquisition of right-of-way is needed, applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the final map to pay for the costs of acquiring off-site real property interests and to complete the improvements required herein at such time as the City acquires an interest in the real property that will permit the improvements to be made by the applicant.

The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with rightof-way acquisition for the purposes of ingress or egress to the project site along Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive, if necessary to accommodate required off-site improvements.

Comments: Modifications to this condition were incorporated to condense the language that was previously approved.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
27 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, grading plan or implementing permit, a site specific drainage study and retention basin design shall be conducted by a registered civil engineer and submitted for review and approval by the City.

Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, grading plan, or permit issuance, a site-specific retention basin design shall be conducted by a registered civil engineer and submitted for review and approval by the City.

Comments: No changes.
28 Relocation and underground plans for canals and drains shall be designed to maintain existing flow rates and structure capacity to the satisfaction of the City and Imperial Irrigation District.

The construction of Countryside Drive crossing over the IID Date Drain must be completed prior to the issuance of the 80th certificate of occupancy. The threshold for this condition may be extended prior to the issuance of the 100th certificate of occupancy if circumstances beyond the applicant’s control occur that delay this improvement, as approved by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director.

The road crossing shall consist of two travel lanes, with no parking lanes, and shall include curb, gutter, and sidewalks on each side. City participation on all costs related to the IID drain construction and Countryside Drive improvements will be three hundred twenty-five thousand dollars, through a reimbursement agreement between City and applicant.

Comments: Modifications to this condition were made since only the segment where Countryside Drive crosses the Date Drain will be undergrounded. Additional details and a timeframe of when improvements should be completed were also included.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
29 The project shall provide a 1.6 acre park in accordance with City's specifications. In-lieu park fees shall be paid for any park area located within the IID easement.

The applicant shall construct or provide security for a 1.3-acre improved park. The park shall include a multi-use grass field, park lighting, hard surface court, multi-use path, picnic, and playground area. The park is to be completed prior to 50% of the certificates of occupancy are issued. The developer shall provide park renderings and construction plans and cost estimates to the City of El Centro for review prior to filing of the first final map. Park development impact fees shall be waived by the City if park costs are higher than the subdivisions’ park development impact fees to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Comments: Originally there was potential to incorporate a park area over the IID Drain underground. As that is no longer the plan, a dedicated park area was included in the new subdivision map. 30 The project shall provide the following minimum building setbacks: front yard, twenty (20') feet; side yards, five (5 ') feet on one side and ten (10') feet on the other side; exterior side yard, fifteen (15') feet; and rear yard, five (5') feet for single story and twenty-five (25') feet for two
story.

The project shall provide the minimum building setbacks in accordance with the R1-Single Family Residential Zone development standards.

Comments: Minor modifications were included to reflect the Residential Zone Development standards at the time of construction. 31 Prior to the first final inspection of each phase of development, all street dedications and off-site
improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving) shall be provided in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance including parkways not less than 6.5 feet wide, measured from the face of the curb to the outside edge of the sidewalk.

Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy of each phase of development, all street dedications and off-site improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving) for each phase shall be provided in accordance with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance.

Comments: Minor modification were included to simplify the original condition.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
32 Utilities shall be provided in accordance with the City's Master Water/Sewer Plan. The applicant may enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the City for any oversizing of water or sewer lines that may be required.

Utilities shall be provided in accordance with the City’s Master Water/Sewer Plan. The applicant may enter into reimbursement agreement with the City for any oversizing of water or sewer lines that may be required.

Comments: No changes.
33 Prior to the first final inspection, the applicant shall provide a minimum of two trees per lot within the parkway strip. Said trees shall be selected from the City's tree list and consist of a variety of trees. Street themes shall be provided.

Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of each residence, the applicant shall provide a minimum of one tree within the parkway strip on Countryside Drive only and one tree within the front yard landscaped area per lot. Said trees shall be selected from the City’s list and consist of variety of trees. The remaining lots shall provide two trees in the front yard.

Comments: Minor modifications were included to change the language from final inspection, to certificate of occupancy. In addition, language was incorporated to specify location of tree's in areas with a parkway and areas without parkways.
34 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall pay the appropriate development impact and sewer/water
capacity fees.

Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall pay the appropriate development impact and sewer and water capacity fees unless deferred to prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in compliance with Ordinance 21-03 and subject to the approval of the City Manager. Payment must clear prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Comments: Modifications were made to the condition to defer fee's until the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
35 Fire hydrants markers and water mains shall be provided in accordance with the Fire Department's specifications. All fire hydrants shall be on a looped water system and shall be in service before any combustible construction begins.

Fire hydrants markers and water mains shall be provided in accordance with the Fire Department’s specifications. Fire hydrants shall be on a looped water system. Any combustible construction shall not begin until a fire hydrant is in service within 150 feet of construction activity. Applicant shall provide a phasing plan to the Engineering Division showing compliance with this condition prior to the issuance of the certificate of compliance.

Comments: Modifications were made to this conditions to provide more descriptive language and require a phasing plan of when work will be completed.
36 Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approved prior to approval of the final map.

Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the approval of the final map.

Comments: No changes.
37 The project shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 (ADA).

The project shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Code of Regulations Title 24 (ADA).

Comments: No changes.
38 Developer shall coordinate project flood protection
improvements with current efforts of the Imperial Irrigation District and other public agencies to provide regional flood protection facilities, if applicable.

The developer shall work directly with IID to obtain an encroachment permit for project related improvements on IID system facilities.

Comments: Modifications were made to update on current IID efforts.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
39 Pursuant to Section 66474.9 of the California Government Code, the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of El Centro, its agents, officers and employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the Planning Commission concerning the tentative
subdivision map, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.3 7.

However, the City of El Centro shall promptly notify the applicant/subdivider of any claim, action, or proceeding and that the City shall cooperate fully
in defense.

Pursuant to Section 66474.9 of the California Government Code, the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of El Centro, its agents, officers and employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the approval of the Planning Commission concerning the tentative subdivision map, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37.

However, the City of El Centro shall promptly notify the applicant/subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and that the City shall cooperate fully in defense.

Comments: No changes.
40 Except as noted above, all conditions shall be met prior to the recordation of the final map.

Except as specified herein, all conditions applicable to a final map phase, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be met before its last certificate of occupancy is issued unless otherwise noted.

Comments: Modifications were made to this condition to change language for meeting conditions to prior to certificate of occupancy to be consistent with changes made to other conditions.
41 The project shall comply with applicable staff comments labeled Exhibit A of the Planning Commission staff report and all other applicable Federal, State and local codes, ordinances and resolutions.

Applicable offsite improvements shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recordation of each final map.

Comments: Condition modifications were incorporated to simplify the language of the condition.
42 The project shall provide a 20" foot multi-use trail with a split rail fence at its center along the northern boundary and a 10-foot multi-use trail along the western boundary of the project site.

Removed
Comments: This condition was removed as a dedicated park area will be constructed.

Original Condition Proposed Condition
43 Public landscaping improvements shall be installed along the northern side of Willow Bend Drive, West side of Carl Street, South of lot 13, North side of Lot 1, and West and East side of Grass (6th) Street in the side yards of the noted locations and homes. Public landscaping improvements shall be included in the lighting and landscape maintenance district.

Comments: This condition was added to specify publicly maintained landscaped areas of the project.
44 A school bus loading area shall be installed in front of the park area, unless otherwise determined by the school districts that the location would be unfeasible for a school bus loading area.

Comments: This condition was added to account for the relocation of the community park.

Addendum to the
Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision
Map Willow Bend
El Centro, California
Prepared for
City of El Centro
1275 W. Main Street
El Centro, CA 92243
Prepared by
RECON Environmental, Inc.
3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 600
San Diego, CA 92108
P 619.308.9333
RECON Number 9938
December 2, 2024

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. ii

1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1

2.0 Project Description .......................................................................................................................1

3.0 Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend EIR ........................ 12

4.0 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Project ....................................................................... 13

4.1 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ........................................................................................... 13

4.2 Air Quality........................................................................................................................................... 14

4.3 Biological Resources ....................................................................................................................... 15

4.4 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................... 16

4.5 Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................................ 16

4.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................. 17

4.7 Noise .................................................................................................................................................... 18

4.8 Public Services and Utilities........................................................................................................... 19

4.9 Transportation and Traffic............................................................................................................. 19

5.0 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 23

6.0 Sources Consulted ..................................................................................................................... 23

FIGURES
1 Regional Location ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2: Project Location on USGS Map ....................................................................................................................3 3: Project Location on Aerial Photograph .....................................................................................................4 4: Approved Tentative Subdivision Map........................................................................................................5 5: Proposed Tentative Subdivision Map.........................................................................................................6

ATTACHMENT
1: Willow Bend Project – Transportation Assessment (LLG Engineers) 2: Intersection Control Evaluation – SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection (LLG Engineers)

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend ii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
Final EIR City of El Centro Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2005101128)
I-8 Interstate 8
ICAPCD Imperial County Air Pollution Control District
ICE Intersection Control Evaluation
IID Imperial Irrigation District
LLG Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
LLMD Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District
NOP Notice of Preparation
SR-86 State Route 86
TIF Traffic Impact Fee
TIS Traffic Impact Study
TM Tentative Subdivision Map

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend

1.0 Introduction
This document is an Addendum to the City of El Centro Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2005101128; hereafter referred to as the Final EIR or 2007 Final EIR). The Addendum analyzes the environmental effects of the proposed changes to the Final EIR from 2007, which analyzed potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the Willow Bend project. The Addendum has been prepared in accordance with relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines.

According to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document in instances when “only minor technical changes or additions are necessary” and when the new information does not involve new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the previous EIR.

This Addendum describes the details of the updated Tentative Subdivision Map (TM) for the Willow Bend project in the City of El Centro and compares its impacts to those identified in the Final EIR.

The analysis herein demonstrates that the proposed addendum involves only minor technical changes to the Final EIR that was adopted in February 2007 and would not result in any new or increased severity significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the Final EIR. As such, an addendum is the appropriate environmental document under CEQA.

2.0 Project Description
The City of El Centro proposes to amend the 2007 Willow Bend TM which was addressed in a Final EIR. The Final EIR is a comprehensive environmental document that reviewed potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the Willow Bend housing project. The currently approved Final EIR would allow for 131 single-family residences, a 1.67-acre park, and a

3.02-acre retention basin on a subdivision of 38 acres.

The project site is located north of McCabe, east of South Clark Road, and west of State Route 86 (SR-86) in the southern part of the city of El Centro (Figures 1-3). The proposed project site remains in agricultural production and is surrounded by residential development to the north and east, and agricultural land to the west and south. Access to the project site would be provided from SR-86 by two driveways, Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive. The proposed project would amend the approved TM (Figure 4) and update the original conditions of approval that were included in the Final EIR.

The addendum compares the impacts from the proposed project with the impacts presented in the 2007 Final EIR for the adopted project. The proposed project would allow for 120 units in comparison to 131 single-family residences approved in the Final EIR. The proposed 11-unit reduction in the number of residential units results in an 8% decrease from the original map. A comparison of Figure 4 (Approved TM) and Figure 5 (Proposed TM) shows that the 11-unit decrease allows for the accommodation of an on-site 1.37-acre park in the center of the site. The on-site retention basin under the revised proposal would be 1.452 acres compared to the 3.02 acres for the original map.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Figure 1: Regional Location

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Figure 2: Project Location on USGS Map

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Figure 3: Project Location on Aerial Photograph

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Figure 4: Approved Tentative Subdivision Map

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Figure 5: Proposed Tentative Subdivision Map

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Unlike the original TM approval, the Date Drain No. 3 would be unaffected by project grading under the revised TM. Additionally, the addendum addresses the applicant’s requested changes and updates to the original project conditions of approval as they apply to issue areas (e.g., traffic conditions of approval). The applicant-requested changes are described below.

List of Applicant-Requested Changes to Original Conditions of Approval Proposed Amendments to Conditions
Condition 1: The project shall include the development of a maximum of 134 single-family residential lots with average minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet. The residences located on lots 129-134 shall be limited to a single story.

Change to: The project shall include the development of a maximum of 120 single-family residential lots with an average minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet.

Condition 10: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (2.7%) or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between McCabe Road and the project site to four lanes along the project frontage.

Change to: Prior to the recording of the first final map, the applicant shall complete or provide security for the widening of Highway 86 (4th Street) to a four-lane right-of-way width along the project frontage prior to recording of the first final map.

The widening, including any required deceleration and acceleration lanes north and south of the development frontage, shall be completed prior to the issuance of the 60th certificate of occupancy, as determined by the approved Caltrans [California Department of Transportation] ICE [Intersection Control Evaluation] Study or other Caltrans requirements.

The No. 2 southbound lane shall merge into the No. 1 southbound lane such that the Countryside Drive and Highway 86 intersection transitions to a single southbound lane at the intersection.

Condition 12: Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall signalize the Highway 86 and Countryside intersection.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of the 1st certificate of occupancy, and contingent upon approval by Caltrans, the applicant shall complete improvements to the intersection at Highway 86 (4th Street) and Countryside Drive to provide full directional access to the development. Final intersection improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the results of the Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) and shall be completed no later than the issuance of the 60th certificate of occupancy, or as determined by the approved Caltrans ICE Study.

Condition 16: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall be required to enter into an agreement with the City for the payment of a fair share cost to mitigate the operation and maintenance impacts to fire and police services caused by the approval of the project. The

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend description of the security for the agreement and the method of payment shall be included in the agreement.

Change to: The applicant agrees to pay standard Police and Fire Impact fees as part of building permit issuance unless deferred as approved by the City of El Centro.

Condition 17: Prior to the first final inspection, the existing Date Drain abutting the western boundary of the project site shall be pipelined, undergrounded and landscaped in accordance with the specifications of the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). In addition, the private delivery canal located along the southern boundary of the project site shall be removed.

Change to: Access to the Date Drain by the public shall be secured with a four-foot-high, three-rail wood fence along the western project site boundary. Fencing shall be installed prior to the completion of Grass Street/6th Street. The applicant shall coordinate with the Imperial Irrigation District for maintenance access requirements.

Condition 18: Prior to the issuance of building permits, a trunk sewer line shall be provided along the eastern boundary of the project adjacent to Highway 86 (outside CalTrans’ right-of-way) extending to the southern boundary, as per city standards.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, a trunk sewer line shall be installed on Carl Street to connect to the existing lift station at Highway 86 (4th Street) and Willow Bend Drive. The trunk sewer line may be constructed within the right-of-way within the development (Carl Street) or adjacent to Highway 86 (4th Street). The Countryside Drive sewer line shall be sized and placed to allow connection from the development at the west.

The developer shall be reimbursed for any additional costs incurred due to upsizing by the development to the west.

Condition 19: A six (6’) foot high solid decorative block/masonry or stucco wall shall be provided along the eastern boundary of lots 1-14 and 129, the western boundary of lots 32 and 134, and the northern boundary of lots 129-134.

Change to: A six (6) foot high solid decorative block/masonry wall shall be provided along the western Highway 86 right-of-way line (eastern boundary of lots 1-14) and along the property lines abutting the park (eastern boundary of lots 81 and 70 and western boundary of lots 80 and 71). A vinyl or composite fencing shall be installed along the southern project boundary (southern boundary of lots 14-31 and western boundary of lot 31).

Condition 20: The proposed storm water retention basin for the project site shall be developed in accordance with the City’s design standards for retention basins.

Change to: The proposed stormwater retention basin for the project site shall be developed in accordance with the City’s design standard for retention basins. This requires a wrought iron fence with pilasters along the perimeter of the basin abutting and visible from the public right-of-way.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Condition 21: Prior to the close of the sale of the thirteenth lot, the applicant shall establish a Lighting/Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District for the project in order to pay for the maintenance of any lighting, landscaping, and Park/Recreation facilities, including graffiti abatement, within the public right-of-way, IID easements, retention basin, park and multi-use trail.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of the thirteenth certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall establish a Lighting and Landscape Maintenance District (LLMD) for the project. The LLMD shall pay for the maintenance of any lighting, landscaping, park, and recreation facilities, including graffiti abatement, within the public right-of-way, IID easement, retention basin and the park.

Condition 26: The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with right-of-way acquisition, if necessary. In the event the acquisition of right-of-way is needed, applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the final map to pay for the costs of acquiring off-site real property interests and to complete the improvements required herein at such time as the City acquires an interest in the real property that will permit the improvements to be made by the applicant.

Change to: The applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with right-of-way acquisition for the purposes of ingress or egress to the project site along Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive, if necessary to accommodate required off-site improvements.

Condition 28: Relocation and underground plans for canals and drains shall be designed to maintain existing flow rates and structure capacity to the satisfaction of the City and Imperial Irrigation District.

Change to: The construction of Countryside Drive crossing over the IID Date Drain must be completed prior to the issuance of the 80th certificate of occupancy. The threshold for this condition may be extended prior to the issuance of the 100th certificate of occupancy if circumstances beyond the applicants control occur that delay this improvement, as approved by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director.

The road crossing shall consist of two travel lanes, with no parking lanes, and shall include curb, gutter, and sidewalks on each side. City participation on all costs related to the IID drain construction and Countryside Drive improvements will be three hundred twenty-five thousand dollars, through a reimbursement agreement between City and applicant.

Condition 29: The project shall provide a 1.6 acre park in accordance with the City’s specifications.

In-lieu park fees shall be paid for any park area located within the IID easement.

Change to: The applicant shall construct or provide security for a 1.3-acre improved park. The park shall include a multi-use grass field, park lighting, hard surface court, multi-use path, picnic, and playground area. The park is to be completed prior to 50% of the certificates of occupancy are issued. The developer shall provide park renderings and construction plans and cost estimates to the City of El Centro for review prior to filing of the first final map. Park development impact fees shall be waived by the City if park costs are higher than the subdivisions’ park development impact fees to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Condition 30: The project shall provide the following minimum building setbacks: front yard, twenty (20’) feet; side yards, five (5’) feet on one side and ten (10’) feet on the other side; exterior side yard, fifteen (15’) feet; and rear yard, five (5’) feet for single story and twenty-five (25’) feet for two story.

Change to: The project shall provide the minimum building setbacks in accordance with the R1-Single Family Residential Zone development standards.

Condition 31: Prior to the first final inspection of each phase of development, all street dedications and off-site improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving) shall be provided in accordance with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance including parkways not less than 6.5 feet wide, measured from the face of the curb to the outside edge of the sidewalk.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy of each phase of development, all street dedications and off-site improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving) for each phase shall be provided in accordance with the City’s Subdivision Ordinance.

Condition 33: Prior to the first final inspection, the applicant shall provide a minimum of two trees per lot within the parkway strip. Said trees shall be selected from the City’s tree list and consist of a variety of trees. Street themes shall be provided.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of each residence, the applicant shall provide a minimum of one tree within the parkway strip on Countryside Drive only and one tree within the front yard landscaped area per lot. Said trees shall be selected from the City’s list and consist of a variety of trees. The remaining lots shall provide two trees in the front yard.

Condition 34: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall pay the appropriate development impact and sewer/water capacity fees.

Change to: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the applicant shall pay the appropriate development impact and sewer and water capacity fees unless deferred to prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy in compliance with Ordinance 21-03 and subject to the approval of the City Manager. Payment must clear prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Condition 35: Fire hydrants, markers, and water mains shall be provided in accordance with the Fire Department’s specifications. All fire hydrants shall be on a looped water system and shall be in service before any combustible construction begins.

Change to: Fire hydrants markers and water mains shall be provided in accordance with the Fire Department’s specifications. Fire hydrants shall be on a looped water system. Any combustible construction shall not begin until a fire hydrant is in service within 150 feet of construction activity. Applicant shall provide a phasing plan to the Engineering Division showing compliance with this condition prior to the issuance of the certificate of compliance.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Condition 38: Developer shall coordinate project flood protection improvements with current efforts of the Imperial Irrigation District and other public agencies to provide regional flood protection facilities, if applicable.

Change to: The developer shall work directly with IID to obtain an encroachment permit for project related improvements on IID system facilities.

Condition 41: The project shall comply with applicable staff comments labeled Exhibit A of the Planning Commission staff report and all other applicable Federal, State and local codes, ordinances and resolutions.

Change to: Applicable off-site improvements shall be completed or secured to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recordation of each final map.

Proposed New Conditions
Condition 43: Public landscaping improvements shall be installed along the northern side of Willow Bend Drive, West side of Carl Street, South of lot 13, North side of lot 1, and West and East side of Grass (6th) Street in the side yards of the noted locations and homes. Public landscaping improvements shall be included in the lighting and landscape maintenance district.

Condition 44: A school bus loading area shall be installed in front of the park area, unless otherwise determined by the school districts that the location would be unfeasible for a school bus loading area.

Proposed Conditions of Approval Requested to be Eliminated Condition 3: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.9%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of a westbound right-turn lane and a second northbound left-turn lane at the westbound ramp of Highway 86 and Interstate 8.

Condition 4: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.6%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of a two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound left-turn lane at the eastbound ramp of Highway 86 and Interstate 8.

Condition 5: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.7%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the construction of a second eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Highway 86 and Wake Avenue.

Condition 6: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall construct a raised median for full turning movement with southbound acceleration and deceleration lanes with a left turn in pocket and left turn at Highway 86 and Horne Road. (As per attached Exhibit A-1, subject to a credit for other traffic impact fees or reimbursement from other benefited projects in the area, at the City’s option.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Condition 7: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (13.8%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the construction of a right turn in/right turn out island from Willow Bend Drive at Highway 86.

Reasoning: This improvement has already been completed.

Condition 8: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (1.5%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the signalization of the Highway 86 and west McCabe Road intersection as well as the provision of a dedicated eastbound and westbound left turn pockets.

Reasoning: This signal light has already been installed.

Condition 9: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (5.6%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between Wake Avenue and Interstate 8 to six (6) lanes.

Reasoning: Work improvements have already been completed.

Condition 11: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall either pay the City a fair share payment (4.6%), or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of Highway 86 between Danenberg Drive and Wake Avenue to four (4) lanes.

Reasoning: Condition can take place when other neighboring frontage properties are developed.

Condition 42: The project shall provide a 20-foot multi-use trail with a split rail fence at its center along the northern boundary and a 10-foot multi-use trail along the western boundary of the project site.

Reason: No longer part of the project.

Potential environmental impacts associated with development according to the General Plan were evaluated in the Final EIR, which is incorporated herein by reference and available at El Centro City Hall and on the City's website.

3.0 Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision
Map Willow Bend EIR
The City of El Centro prepared an EIR for the Willow Bend project in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was filed with the California Office of Planning and Research and distributed to public agencies and interested parties for a 30-day public review period. The Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period that ran from August 9, 2006, to September 22, 2006. The Final EIR was certified in February 2007 by the City Council of the City of El Centro.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend As noted previously, the EIR addresses the potential environmental effects associated with the development of the Willow Bend project, which includes annexation to the City of El Centro and residential subdivision of 131 single-family residences. The scope of the EIR includes environmental issues determined to be potentially significant based on the Initial Study and responses to the NOP.

The following issues are addressed in detail in the EIR:
• Agriculture and Forestry Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
• Geology and Soils
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Noise
• Public Services and Utilities
• Transportation and Traffic
The Final EIR identifies significant and unavoidable impacts related to agriculture resources and air quality.

4.0 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Project
This section addresses each of the environmental issues discussed in the Final EIR to determine whether or not the proposed project has the potential to create new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the significance of a previously identified significant impact as compared to what was identified in the Final EIR.

4.1 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
2007 Final EIR
The Final EIR states that the project site is considered to contain Farmland of Statewide Importance.

Table 5.1-3 of the Final EIR includes a soils summary for the acreage of the project site. The Final EIR concluded that the conversion of agricultural land to urban use would constitute a significant loss of Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance, and potential impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

As noted in the Final EIR, the Imperial County Assessor’s office indicated that no active Williamson Act contracts encumber the project site. Therefore, no impacts Williamson Act contract lands were identified. Additionally, the Final EIR identified the surrounding area to be composed of residential and agricultural uses. The proposed project would conflict with agricultural land use to the west and south of the site; however, the eventual conversion of the lands to urban uses was analyzed in the Final EIR and potential impacts were disclosed and mitigated where feasible. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Proposed Project
Housing development under the proposed Willow Bend Project would continue to occur on land that is designated as Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown in the Final EIR and California Important Farmland Finder. The project could contribute to the significant impact associated with the General Plan Update by converting sites containing designated farmlands to residential use.

However, because the project does not include any land use designation changes beyond those included in the Final EIR, it would not result in any new significant impact identified in the Final EIR.

Because the City and Sphere of Influence (SOI) include no Williamson Act contracts or agriculturally zoned land, the Project would similarly have no conflict related to Williamson Act contracts. The project site is designated as a Low Density Residential land use in the Land Use Map in the City of El Centro General Plan 2040. Thus, it would not result in any new significant impact or increased severity of a previously identified significant impact.

4.2 Air Quality
Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plan
2007 Final EIR
The Final EIR determined that the proposed project was not consistent with the Imperial County Air Quality Attainment Plan (Attainment Plan) and the State Implementation Plan for PM10 in the Imperial Valley due to the proposed project resulting in a higher density and generating more vehicle trips.

Therefore, impacts would be considered significant and unavoidable.

Proposed Project
The incremental decrease in the number of units associated with the project (11 units) would not affect the conclusions presented in the Final EIR. Impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Cumulative Increase in Emissions
2007 Final EIR
Tables 5.2-3 and 5.2-4 in the Final EIR provide an analysis of both short-term construction emissions and long-term emissions, respectively. Analysis in the Final EIR found that without mitigation measures, all short-term construction emissions were considered to have significant impacts.

Mitigation measures AQ 5.2-1 through AQ 5.2-9 were included in the Final EIR in respect to shortterm construction emissions. These measures would reduce the project-related emissions to levels less than significant.

Long-term emissions as a result of the proposed project were found to be below the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD) thresholds of significance. Therefore, long-term impacts as a result of the project were considered less than significant.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Proposed Project:

The proposed project would contribute to the significant and unavoidable air quality impacts identified in the Final EIR by accommodating additional housing throughout the City, but would not accommodate any housing development beyond that noted in the City’s General Plan. Additionally, all development under the project would be subject to applicable ICAPCD requirements as well as mitigation measures AQ 5.2-1 through AQ 5.2-9 from the Final EIR. As such, both construction and operational emission impacts associated with development under the project would remain significant and unavoidable.

Odors Impacts
2007 Final EIR
The Final EIR notes that the project presented the potential for the generation of objectionable odors in the form of diesel exhaust in the immediate vicinity of the site during construction. However, the emissions would rapidly dissipate and be diluted by the atmosphere downwind of the emission sources. The Final EIR cites the ICAPCD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, which provides screening level distances for potential odor impacts. According to the handbook, if a project is proposed within one mile of a wastewater treatment plant, sanitary landfill, composting station, feedlot, asphalt batching plant, painting/coating operation, or rendering plant, a potential odor problem may result. The project site is approximated one-quarter mile north of a horse stable and the ICAPCD was contacted at the time of the Final EIR to request an any odor complaints were lodged in the project area. The ICAPCD indicated that no odor complaints were submitted within the last year at the time of the request. Due to this result, the Final EIR concluded that the project would not subject a substantial amount of people to objectionable odors.

Proposed Project
The proposed project does not include heavy industrial or agricultural uses that are typically associated with objectionable odors. The project would involve the use of diesel-powered equipment during construction which may be noticeable at adjacent properties; however, construction activities would be temporary, and the odors would dissipate quickly in an outdoor environment. There is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Final EIR. Therefore, the project would not result in any new or increased severity significant odor impact beyond that identified in the Final EIR.

4.3 Biological Resources
2007 Final EIR
A field survey and literature review were conducted for the Final EIR in 2005 by Michael Brandman Associates. The Final EIR determined that there would be construction-related, temporary impacts to sensitive wildlife species including the burrowing owl and Cooper’s hawk, when nesting. In regards to impacts to the burrowing owl, the field survey concluded that owls were utilizing the IID’s drains in the survey area, and would be adversely impacted on a short-term basis during construction

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend activities to underground the drains. Construction activities would include potential direct fatalities to the owls, and result in displacement of owls and burrows.

Additionally, long-term indirect impacts would occur as a result of the residential development. The impacts would include increased recreational use of the berms, and the overall impact would include increased harassment of owls due to human activity and pets utilizing the berms. Development of the project site was determined to result in long-term permanent impacts to 38 acres of burrowing owl foraging, dispersing, and nesting habitat. Mitigation measures BR 5.3-1 through BR 5.3-8 were included in the Final EIR in respect to burrowing owls and nesting birds to reduce impacts to a level less than significant.

Proposed Project
As described in the 2007 Final EIR, the proposed project also has the potential to result in direct impacts to nesting birds (including the burrowing owl) within the project area if vegetation removal occurs during the typical bird breeding season. Direct impacts to nesting birds would be considered significant and require mitigation. As conditions have not changed on the site, the proposed project would be subject to the mitigation measures established in the Final EIR, BR 5.3-1 through BR 5.3-8.

The project would not result in a new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts occur from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

4.4 Cultural Resources
2007 Final EIR
The Final EIR included a cultural resource survey prepared by Michael Brandman Associates in February 2006. The analysis concluded that there was a low potential for impacts to prehistoric cultural resources. However, if in the event that prehistoric cultural resources are accidentally discovered, the potential impacts would be mitigated by the implementation of measures CR 5.4-1 and CR 5.4-2 and considered less than significant.

Proposed Project
The proposed project could contribute to potential significant impacts to historical resources as identified in the Final EIR. Since there is always the potential for undiscovered resources to be uncovered, the mitigation measures from the 2007 Final EIR would continue to apply. The impacts would remain potentially significant and mitigated.

4.5 Geology and Soils
2007 Final EIR
Section 5.5 of the Final EIR provides an analysis of the geology and soils impacts associated with the project. The Final EIR determined that the project site does not lie within a State of California Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone; however, there is still potential for seismic activity that could produce moderate to strong ground motion from earthquakes in the region. Structures would be

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend required to incorporate earthquake-reducing design with the latest Uniform Building Code and California Building Code and the appropriate seismic design criteria. As discussed in Section 5.5.1, Existing Conditions of the Final EIR, the project site is not anticipated to be impacted by landslides, volcanic hazards, tsunamis, seiches, or flooding. In addition, the Final EIR found that the potential for liquefaction induced settlements to occur on the project site is low and impacts were considered to be less than significant.

The Final EIR also found that critically expansive soils were present around the project site; thus, there is the potential for soils to have high potential for expansion. Additionally, the EIR states that groundwater was encountered at a level of eight feet below ground surface during the geotechnical investigation. Soils encountered below three feet have the potential to pump groundwater under heavy construction wheel loads due to the silty conditions in the near surface soils. Therefore, light earthmoving equipment should be anticipated for use on the project site during construction activities to reduce the potential for groundwater pumping. The Final EIR included measures GS 5.5-1 through GS 5.5-6 to address these impacts. After implementation of the measures, geology and soils impacts would be reduced to less than significant.

Proposed Project
A site-specific geotechnical investigation was not conducted for the currently proposed project as conditions have not changed. There is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Final EIR. The proposed project would be subject to all mitigation measures GS 5.5-1 through GS 5.5-6 from the Final EIR. The project would not result in a new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts occur from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

4.6 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
2007 Final EIR
Section 5.6 of the Final EIR details the analysis of the hazards and hazardous materials associated with the project. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for the project site prior to the completion of the Final EIR.
a. Short-Term Impacts:

The Final EIR states that grading and construction activities may involve the limited transport, storage, usage, or disposal of hazardous materials such as the fueling and/or servicing of construction equipment. Such activity is subject to federal, state, and local health and safety requirements. It is likely that the construction phase of the project will generate hazardous waste such as paint, therefore the project would be subject to the Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Program. Contractors would be required to employ a licensed hazardous waste hauler to obtain and transport such waste. This requirement would ensure that no significant short-term impacts would occur.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend b. Long-Term Impacts:

The Final EIR found that there was the potential for previously unknown hazardous materials to be encountered during project development from historical use of the project site. Long-term impacts were identified and mitigation measures HM 5.6-1 and HM 5.6-2 were included to reduce project-related hazardous material impacts to less than significant.

Proposed Project
If grading of the project site were to encounter any hazardous materials within the soil under the project site, the project would be required to comply with policies contained in the Final EIR, and regulations imposed by federal, state, and local agencies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Health Services, Imperial County Waste Management Department, Regional Water Quality Control Board – Colorado River Basin Region, Salton Sea Air Basin Air Pollution Control District, and the City of El Centro Fire Department. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the 2007 Final EIR. The proposed project would follow the mitigation measures presented in the Final EIR. The project would not result in a new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the Final EIR occur.

4.7 Noise
2007 Final EIR
Section 5.7 of the 2007 Final EIR analyzed noise impacts based on the noise assessment prepared for the proposed project by VRPA Technologies, Inc. in March 2006. The Final EIR identified short-term noise impacts during construction and included mitigation measure N 5.7-1 to ensure that noise level standards are met.

Proposed Project
The proposed project would involve construction and operational noise nearly identical to that identified in the 2007 Final EIR. The project would produce short-term noise impacts associated with construction due to noise generating vehicles and construction operations. Impacts would remain potentially significant, however; mitigation measure N 5.7-1 from the Final EIR would apply to development under the project. The proposed project would not create any new significant impact related to short-term construction noise, nor would there be a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

The proposed project would contribute to traffic on the local roadways, however there is no evidence that the proposed project would not increase the severity of this already identified significant impact or result in any new significant impact related to traffic noise.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend

4.8 Public Services and Utilities
2007 Final EIR
The Final EIR addressed fire protection services, police protection services, public education, libraries, parks and recreational services and facilities, potable water services, wastewater, solid waste, energy, and telecommunications. Fire and police protection impacts were determined to be potentially significant due to the project having the potential to increase demands for both services which would have an adverse impact on response times and staffing ratios. The Final EIR included mitigation measures PSU 5.8-1 and 5.8-2 that required the applicant to enter into an agreement that will mitigate operational impacts to fire and police services caused by the approval of the project.

Additionally, the Final EIR included mitigation measure T 5.8-1 which would mitigate the operational impacts to the Imperial Valley Telecommunications Authority. Potential impacts on schools, library services, parks and recreation, potable water, solid waste, energy, and telecommunications were deemed less than significant.

Proposed Project
The proposed project would include the development of 120 single-family homes and would not result in a need for any new or expanded public services. In addition, the project would not result in a need for a new or expanded fire, police, school, library, park or other public facility. The project would continue to be subject to mitigation measures PSU 5.8-1 and 5.8-2 from the Final EIR as they relate to fire and police services. Therefore, the project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would there be a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

In regards to utilities, the proposed project would extend water service connections from IID, and would connect to the existing sewer line. Due to the proposed homesite lots being accounted for in the 2007 Final EIR, there is no evidence that the project would require a major change to the Final EIR. The proposed project would be subject to the mitigation in the Final EIR for telecommunications, T 5.8-1. The project would not create any new significant impacts, nor would there be a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

4.9 Transportation and Traffic
2007 Final EIR
A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared for the Final EIR by Katz, Okitsu & Associates in July 2006.

The TIS and Final EIR did not identify any significant impacts due to transportation and traffic issues; however, there were nine conditions of approval for nine different intersections and roadway segments near the project site when the Final EIR was adopted that would be implemented throughout phases of the project (TT 6-1 through TT 6-2).

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Proposed Project
A Transportation Assessment for the proposed project was prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) on June 27, 2022. The assessment is included as Attachment 1. The assessment provided analysis to determine which of the original conditions of approval for the approved Willow Bend Project are still necessary given the current traffic situation surrounding the project site. The assessment reviewed 10 conditions of approval. Specifically, the analysis focused on whether the following 10 improvements are still necessary:

1. SR-86 between Interstate 8 (I-8) eastbound ramps and Wake Avenue – contribute a fair-share to widen to six lanes.

2. SR-86/I-8 westbound ramp – contribute a fair-share to construct a westbound right-turn lane and a second northbound left-turn lane.

3. SR-86/I-8 eastbound ramp – contribute a fair-share to construct two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound left-turn lane.

4. SR-86/Wake Avenue – contribute a fair-share to construct a dedicated eastbound left-turn lane.

5. SR-86/Horne Road – construct a raised median for full turning movement with southbound acceleration and deceleration lanes with a left turn in pocket and left turn at SR-86 and Horne Road. Subject to a credit from other traffic impact fees or reimbursement from other benefited projects in the area, at the City’s option.

6. SR-86/Willow Bend Drive – contribute a fair-share to construct a right-in/right-out island from the project driveway.

7. SR-86/Countryside Drive – signalize the intersection.

8. SR-86/McCabe Road – contribute a fair-share to signalize the intersection and construct dedicated eastbound and westbound left-turn pockets.

9. SR-86 between Project Access and McCabe Road – contribute a fair-share to widen to four lanes including along the Project frontage.

10. SR-86 between Wake Avenue and Danenberg Drive – contribute a fair-share to widen to four lanes.

The LLG report concluded that only a few of the original conditions of approval are deemed necessary to be implemented. Their report concluded the following:

1. SR-86 between I-8 eastbound ramps and Wake Avenue – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of SR-86 between I-8 and Wake Avenue to six lanes.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Based on the analysis for this street segment, acceptable levels of service are calculated under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to widen this street segment to six lanes can be removed.

2. SR-86/I-8 westbound ramp – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of a westbound right-turn lane and a second northbound left-turn lane at the westbound ramp of SR-86 and I-8.

It should be noted that this intersection already has a westbound right-turn lane. Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Therefore, the remaining condition to construct a second northbound left-turn lane can be removed.

3. SR-86/I-8 eastbound ramp – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound left-turn lane at the eastbound ramp of SR-86 and I-8.

Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to construct two eastbound right-turn lanes and a second southbound left-turn lane can be removed.

4. SR-86/Wake Avenue – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the provision of a dedicated eastbound left-turn lane at the intersection of SR-86 and Wake Avenue.

Based on the analysis for this intersection, an unacceptable level of service is calculated during the PM peak hour under near-term conditions. However, the City will be conducting a roadway maintenance project at the end of 2022 and will stripe a dedicated eastbound left-turn lane as part of that work. Therefore, this condition can be removed.

5. SR-86/Horne Road – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall construct a raised median for full turning movement with southbound acceleration and deceleration lanes with a left turn in pocket and left turn at SR-86 and Horne Road. Subject to a credit for other traffic impact fees or reimbursement from other benefited projects in the area, at the City’s option.

Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to construct a raised median and reconfigure the lane geometry at this intersection can be removed.

6. SR-86/Willow Bend Drive – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the construction of a right turn in/right turn out island from Willow Bend Drive at SR-86.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend It should be noted that this intersection currently has an island that allows for a southbound left-turn movement to enter Willow Bend Drive on the east leg. Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Since this intersection already has an island that only allows right-in/right-out at the project driveway, the conditions for this intersection can be removed.

However, it is recommended that a northbound left-turn pocket is constructed to allow for an inbound access at this driveway from the south.

7. SR-86/Countryside Drive – Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall signalize the SR-86 and Countryside Drive intersection.

Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to signalize this intersection can be removed. An ICE was completed for the SR-86/Countryside Drive intersection based on Year 2045 (Horizon Year) forecast traffic volumes in conjunction with traffic generated by the proposed project. The ICE is included as Attachment 2. The ICE determined that both an All-Way Stop Control configuration and a roundabout configuration would operate at acceptable levels of service in the Year 2045 (Horizon Year) scenario. Caltrans will determine which of these two configurations will be selected for the SR-86/Countryside Drive intersection.

8. SR-86/McCabe Road – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the signalization of the SR-86 and west McCabe Road intersection as well as the provision of a dedicated eastbound and westbound left-turn pockets.

It should be noted that this intersection is already signalized. Based on the analysis for this intersection, acceptable levels of service are calculated during the AM and PM peak hours under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to provide dedicated eastbound and westbound left-turn pockets can be removed.

9. SR-86 between Project Access and McCabe Road – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of SR-86 between the project site and McCabe Road to four lanes along the project frontage.

Based on the analysis for this street segment, acceptable levels of service are calculated under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to widen this street segment to four lanes can be removed between the Project Access at Countryside Drive and McCabe Road. However, the condition to widen should still be implemented between Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive fronting the Project site.

10. SR-86 between Wake Avenue and Danenberg Drive – Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay the City a fair-share payment or provide the appropriate Traffic Impact Fee (TIF), towards the widening of SR 86 between Wake Avenue and Danenberg Drive to four lanes.

Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report
Zone Change 05-05 and Tentative Subdivision Map Willow Bend Based on the analysis for this street segment, acceptable levels of service are calculated under near-term conditions. Therefore, the condition to widen this street segment to four lanes can be removed.

As described above, the SR-86/Wake Avenue location was calculated to operate at unacceptable levels of services; however, the City will be conducting a roadway maintenance project at the end of 2022 and will stripe a dedicated eastbound left-turn lane as a part of their work. Once completed, the original condition for this location can be removed. Also, with implementation of the adjustments to improvements described above to improvements 6, 7, and 9, the project would not create any new significant impact, nor would a substantial increase in the severity of impacts occur from that described in the 2007 Final EIR.

5.0 Conclusion
The proposed revised project is consistent with the Willow Bend Final EIR that the City of El Centro adopted in 2007 and would not result in any new significant impacts or increased severity significant impacts beyond those identified in the El Centro General Plan Update Final EIR. Therefore, this Addendum is the appropriate environmental document under CEQA.

6.0 Sources Consulted
El Centro, City of
2021 El Centro General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report. March. 2021 El Centro General Plan Update Final Program Environmental Impact Report. June. 2021 El Centro General Plan Update. June.
2021 Draft El Centro Housing Element Update. September.

SECTION Y-Y
tel 760.353.8110 fax 760.352.6408
www.lcec-inc.com 1065 State Street [email protected]
El Centro CA 92243

CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES LC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC.
670 East 32nd Street - Suite #2 - Yuma, Az 85364
Email: [email protected]
Yuma Phone: 928-318-2043
Arizona, California and New Mexico
Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION - 64' R/W
COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE CROSS SECTION - 64' R/W

670 East 32nd Street - Suite #2 - Yuma, Az 85364
Email: [email protected]
Yuma Phone: 928-318-2043
Arizona, California and New Mexico
Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers
LC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INC.

CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES www.lcec-inc.com 1065 State Street [email protected]
tel 760.353.8110 fa El Centro CA 92243 x 760.352.6408

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
SR-86 / COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE INTERSECTION
El Centro, California
December 3, 2024
LLG Ref. 3-23-3841
Prepared by: Under the Supervision of:

Narasimha Prasad John Boarman. P. E.

Senior Transportation Engineer Principal

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1

2.0 Existing Traffic Conditions ....................................................................................................... 4

2.1 Existing Traffic Conditions................................................................................................. 4

2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 4

2.3 Safety Review - Existing Traffic Collision History ............................................................ 5

2.4 Natural Habitat and Visual Impacts .................................................................................... 5

3.0 Near-Term and Long-Term Year 2045 Traffic Volumes ....................................................... 8

3.1 Proposed Willow Bend Project ........................................................................................... 8

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes With Willow Bend Project ........................................................ 8

3.3 Year 2045 Volumes Forecast ............................................................................................ 10

4.0 Planning-level Screening Analysis .......................................................................................... 14

4.1 Unsignalized Operations Evaluation ................................................................................. 14

4.2 Signal Operations Evaluation ........................................................................................... 15

4.3 Roundabout Operations Evaluation .................................................................................. 16

5.0 Intersection Analysis ................................................................................................................ 17

5.1 Analysis Scenarios ............................................................................................................ 17

5.2 Intersection Analysis ......................................................................................................... 17

5.2.1 Existing ................................................................................................................. 17

5.2.2 Existing With Willow Bend Traffic ...................................................................... 18

5.2.3 Year 2045 .............................................................................................................. 18

5.3 Queue Analysis ................................................................................................................. 18

5.3.1 Existing ................................................................................................................. 18

5.3.2 Existing With Willow Bend Project ..................................................................... 18

5.3.3 Year 2045 .............................................................................................................. 18

6.0 Intersection Alternatives Discussion ...................................................................................... 22

6.1 Minor-Street Stop Control Alternative ............................................................................. 22

6.1.1 Safety Considerations ........................................................................................... 23

6.1.2 Right-of-Way Easement Impacts .......................................................................... 23

6.1.3 Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................... 23

6.2 All-Way Stop Control Alternative .................................................................................... 23

6.2.1 Safety Considerations ........................................................................................... 24

6.2.2 Right-of-Way Easement Impacts .......................................................................... 24

6.2.3 Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................... 24

6.3 Traffic Signal Alternative ................................................................................................. 24

6.3.1 Safety Considerations ........................................................................................... 25

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

6.3.2 Right-of-Way Easement Impacts .......................................................................... 25

6.3.3 Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................... 25

6.4 Roundabout Alternative .................................................................................................... 25

6.4.1 Safety Considerations ........................................................................................... 26

6.4.2 Right-of-Way Easement Impacts .......................................................................... 29

6.4.3 Environmental Impacts ......................................................................................... 30

7.0 Signal Warrant Analysis ......................................................................................................... 36

7.1 Near-Term Conditions ...................................................................................................... 37

7.2 Long-Term (Year 2045) Conditions ................................................................................. 45

7.3 Summary of Warrants Satisfied ........................................................................................ 46

8.0 Project Costs ............................................................................................................................. 47

8.1 Construction Cost.............................................................................................................. 47

8.2 Operation and Maintenance Cost ...................................................................................... 47

9.0 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................. 50

APPENDICES

APPENDIX
A. Existing Traffic Collision Data
B. Intersection and Queue Analysis Worksheets – Existing C. Intersection and Queue Analysis Worksheets – Existing With Willow Bend D. Intersection and Queue Analysis Worksheets – Year 2045 With Willow Bend E. Figure 4C-103(CA), MUTCD

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx iii

LIST OF FIGURES
SECTION—FIGURE # PAGE
Figure 1–1 Vicinity Map ................................................................................................................. 2 Figure 1–2 Project Area Map .......................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2–1 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2–2 Existing Volumes .......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3–1 Willow Bend Project Site Plan. .................................................................................. 11 Figure 3–2 Existing With Willow Bend Project Traffic Volumes ................................................ 12 Figure 3–3 Year 2045 Traffic Volumes ........................................................................................ 13 Figure 6–1 Conceptual Plan – Two-Way Stop Control ................................................................ 31 Figure 6–2 Conceptual Plan – All-Way Stop Control ................................................................... 32 Figure 6–3 Conceptual Plan – Signal Control ............................................................................... 33 Figure 6–4 Conceptual Plan – Roundabout Control (I-Lane) ....................................................... 34 Figure 6–5 Conceptual Plan – Roundabout Control (2-Lane) ...................................................... 35

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx iv

LIST OF TABLES
SECTION—TABLE # PAGE
Table 3–1 Willow Bend Project Trip Generation ................................................................................. 9 Table 4–1 Suggested Intersection Control Strategies by Total ADT Entering ................................... 14 Table 4–2 LOS Descriptions ............................................................................................................... 15 Table 4–3 Intersection Level of Service (LOS) & Delay Ranges ...................................................... 15 Table 4–4 LOS Criteria for Roundabout Intersections ....................................................................... 16 Table 5–1 Intersection Analysis.......................................................................................................... 19 Table 5-2 Queue Analysis ................................................................................................................... 20 Table 7–1 Warrant 1: Eight - Hour Vehicular Volume: Existing 70% Criteria ................................ 37 Table 7–2 Warrant 1: Traffic Volume Data: Existing With Willow Bend Traffic 70% Criteria ....... 38 Table 7–3 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Warrant: Existing with Willow Bend Traffic ............... 40 Table 7–4 Warrant 3: Peak - Hour: Existing ...................................................................................... 42 Table 7–9 Signal Warrant Analysis Summary .................................................................................... 46 Table 8–1 Alternatives Construction Costs ........................................................................................ 47 Table 8–2 20-Year Stop-Control Condition Maintenance Costs (Intersection Lighting) .................. 48 Table 8–3 20-Year Traffic Signal Maintenance Costs ....................................................................... 48 Table 8–4 20-Year Roundabout Maintenance Costs (Intersection Lighting) .................................... 49 Table 9–1 Alternatives Performance Summary Table ........................................................................ 52

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 1 INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
SR-86 / COUNTRYSIDE DRIVE
Imperial County, California
December 3, 2024

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) has prepared the following report to detail our assessment, findings, and conclusions of the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) at the intersection of SR-86 / Countryside Drive, a Caltrans-maintained intersection located in El Centro.

LLG conducted an ICE analysis to objectively evaluate and screen intersection control alternatives at the subject intersection. The intersection traffic control options which were assessed are minor-street stop, all-way stop, signalization, and roundabout control. The intersection control alternatives were analyzed using Year 2045 (Horizon Year) forecast traffic volumes including traffic generated by the planned Willow Bend project.

Figure 1–2 depicts the Vicinity Map and Figure 1–3 depicts the area of the subject intersection in greater detail.

City of Brawley
City of Calipatria
City of Westmorland
City of Holtville
City of Imperial
City of El Centro
City of Calexico
Project
Site
MEXICO
Salton Sea
Vicinity Map
Figure 1-1
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\Figures
Date: 12/07/23

Intersec
Ɵon Loca
Ɵon
Figure 1-
2 SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\FiguresDate: 12/07/23
Countryside Drive
Willow Bend Dr
Legacy Dr
SR-86
3rd St

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 4 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

2.1 Existing Traffic Conditions
Following is a description of the two subject roadways:

SR-86
As described in the Circulation and Scenic Highways Element, Imperial County, January 29, 2008, State Route 86 is generally a north-south route and begins near the community of Heber in the south as a two-lane conventional highway and continues into Riverside County line in the north as a fourlane expressway.

Near the SR-86/Countryside Drive intersection, SR-86 is built as 3-Lane Road to the north of Countryside Drive up to Dannenberg Road, with a raised median, two lanes northbound and one lane southbound. South of Countryside Drive to McCabe Road, SR-86 is a two-lane undivided road. Curb, gutter, and sidewalks are not provided. Bike lanes and bus stops are not provided, and the speed limit is posted at 55 mph.

The Willow Bend Project will build the second southbound through Lane on SR 86 along its frontage between just north of Willow Bend Drive and just south of Countryside Drive.

Countryside Drive
Countryside Drive is a two-lane residential street east of SR-86. Curb, gutter, and non-contiguous sidewalks are provided on Countryside Drive. Countryside Drive ends at SR-86 and does not continue west of SR-86.

The Willow Bend Project, which is planned on the westside of SR 86 between just north of Willow Bend Drive and just south of Countryside Drive will extend Countryside Drive to the west of SR 86.

This new west leg of the SR 86/ Countryside Drive intersection will provide access to the site.

Existing conditions are depicted graphically on Figure 2–1.

The SR-86/Countryside Drive intersection is currently a three-leg intersection, with stop control on westbound Countryside Drive. Currently, the west leg does not exist. Hence, the existing intersection geometry is as follows:
 Southbound: One left-turn lane and one through lane
 Westbound: One shared left / right lane
 Northbound: One through lane and one shared through / right lane

2.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing traffic volume counts were obtained from the Caltrans Traffic Census Website. Figure 2–2 depicts the existing peak hour volumes at the SR-86 / Countryside Drive intersection.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 5 2.3 Safety Review - Existing Traffic Collision History A total of one (1) collision occurred on SR-86 at Countryside Drive based on accident data provided by the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) over a six-year period from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2021. This collision involved a vehicle and an object with injury to one person. There are no fatalities reported at this location.

Appendix A contains the Collision data.

2.4 Natural Habitat and Visual Impacts
The affected right of way is comprised primarily of disturbed soils within the existing right-of-way (ROW). West of SR-86, agricultural land and overhead electrical distribution line poles are present both the north and south side of Countryside Drive. An irrigation canal runs north/south on the east side of SR-86 and provides a delivery point to the farmlands west of SR-86, south of Countryside Drive. East of SR-86 are single-family residences, with a sub-division generally north of Countryside Drive and larger single-family lots south of Countryside Drive. There are no scenic resources occurring within this area.

$!"Countryside Dr
SR-86
DJ H
JK
1 ExisƟng CondiƟons Diagram
Figure 2-1
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\FiguresDate: 12/07/23
Countryside Drive
SR-86
1

L
J D
LD
J Countryside Dr
SR-86
27 / 25
189 / 340
32 / 89
114 / 65
56 / 16
274 / 171
1 ExisƟng Traffic Volumes
Figure 2-2
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\FiguresDate: 12/07/23
Countryside Drive
SR-86
1

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 8 3.0 NEAR-TERM AND LONG-TERM YEAR 2045 TRAFFIC VOLUMES The impetus for this analysis is the proposed reconfiguration and control of the SR-86 / Countryside Drive intersection. Currently, this is a T-intersection with no west leg. The fourth (west) leg will be provided at this intersection and will provide direct access to the proposed Willow Bend project. The following intersection geometry is proposed at the SR-86 / Countryside Drive intersection:
 Southbound: One left turn lane, one through lane and one shared through /right lane. The No.2 SB lane may be a dedicated right turn lane in the interim, awaiting development south of the project.
 Westbound: One left turn lane and one shared through / right-turn lane  Northbound: One left turn lane, one through lane and one shared through /right lane  Eastbound: One left turn lane and one shared through / right-turn lane (new west leg)

3.1 Proposed Willow Bend Project
The Willow Bend residential project (Project) is proposed on the west side of SR-86 between Willow Bend Drive and Countryside Drive. The Willow Bend Traffic Impact Study dated March 2006 was approved by the City. Following is one of the conditions of approval:
 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall signalize the Highway 86 and Countryside intersection.

The traffic signal at this intersection was recommended in the previous March 2006 report but is no longer required as described later in this report. Since this intersection is maintained by Caltrans, an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) study is required.

Table 3-1 summarizes the Trip Generation for the proposed Willow Bend Project. As seen in Table 3–1, the Willow Bend project is calculated to generate 1,264 daily trips with 94 AM peak hour trips (24 inbound/ 70 outbound trips) and 126 PM peak hour trips (79 inbound/ 47 outbound trips).

It should be noted that after this report was completed, the number of units in the proposed Project was reduced to 120. However, since this analysis assumes 134 units, the analysis is conservative and the very small decrease in peak hour trips would not change the results of this analysis.

Figure 3–1 depicts the proposed Willow Bend project site plan.

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes With Willow Bend Project
The traffic generated by the Willow Bend project was assigned to the SR-86 / Countryside Drive intersection. This traffic was added to the existing traffic at this intersection to obtain the Existing with Willow Bend project traffic at the SR-86 / Countryside Drive intersection.

Figure 3–2 depicts the Existing with Willow Bend project traffic volumes.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 9 TABLE 3–1

WILLOW BEND PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Land Use Size Daily Trip Ends
(ADTs)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Rate a Volume Rate a In:Out
Split a
Volume Rate a In:Out
Split a
Volume
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing b
134 DU 9.43 / DU 1,264 0.70 / DU b 26:74 24 70 94 0.94 / DU b 63:37 79 47 126 Source: Table 1-1 Project Trip Generation, The Willow Bend Traffic Impact Study, March 2006.

Footnotes: a. Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. b. Rates for Single-Family Detached Housing (Land Use 210) were used.

General Notes:

DU – dwelling units

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 10 3.3 Year 2045 Volumes Forecast
In order to obtain future ADT and peak hour volumes for the Year 2045 conditions, a growth factor was applied to the existing traffic volumes. For the purposes of this report, a growth factor of 1.28 was obtained from the approved Circulation and Scenic Highways Element report, January 2008. The growth factor was calculated between the forecasted Year 2025 and Year 2050 ADT volumes. The traffic generated by the Willow Bend project was added to the Year 2045 traffic to obtain the total Year 2045 Traffic.

Figure 3-3 depicts the Year 2045 project Traffic Volumes.

N:\3841\Figures
Date: 11/10/23
San Marcos Bl
Grand Ave
Willow Bend Site Plan
Figure 3-1
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project

J
J
L

LJ D J D
DLDL
Countryside Dr
SR-86
274 / 171
5/5
10 / 33 114 / 65
194 / 343
32 / 89
5/5
56 / 16
60 / 40
5/4
4 / 12
27 / 25
1 ExisƟng (With Willow Bend Project) Traffic Volumes
Figure 3-2
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\FiguresDate: 03/05/24
Countryside Drive
SR-86
1

J
J
L

LJ D J D
DLDL
Countryside Dr
SR-86
351 / 219
5/5
10 / 33 146 / 83
247 / 438
41 / 114
5/5
72 / 20
60 / 40
5/4
4 / 12
35 / 32
1 Year 2045 (with Willow Bend Project) Traffic Volumes
Figure 3-3
SR-86 / Countryside Drive Intersection - ICE Project
N:\3841\FiguresDate: 03/05/24
Countryside Drive
SR-86
1 Study Intersections
Intersection AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
#
DJL
1

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 14 4.0 PLANNING-LEVEL SCREENING ANALYSIS
According to the ICE Process Steps & Outcomes flowchart provided in TOPD 13-02, an initial screening should be performed to eliminate options and strategies that fail to meet the established need. To facilitate this initial screening process, Table 4–1 provides thresholds for suggested control strategies by Average Daily Traffic on the adjacent roadways. The Design Year for modeling future traffic volumes and estimated ADT is 2045 and the estimated total entering ADT at this intersection is 11,800 vehicles per day in the Year 2045. Using this ADT based screening method, grade separation can be eliminated as a rational traffic control strategy. Therefore, this study assesses Minor-Street Stop Control, the All-Way Stop Control, Signal Control and Single-Lane Roundabout Control for the design and traffic analysis process.

TABLE 4–1

SUGGESTED INTERSECTION CONTROL STRATEGIES BY TOTAL ADT ENTERING Total Entering ADT All-Way Stop Signal Yield (RBT) Grade Separation 7,500-15,000 X X (Single lane)
15,000-25,000 X X X (Single lane)
25,000-80,000 X X (Multi-lane)
>80,000 X
There are various methodologies used to analyze signalized and unsignalized intersections. The measure of effectiveness for intersections is level of service (LOS) which denotes the operating conditions which occur at a given intersection. It is a qualitative measure used to describe a quantitative analysis considering factors such as roadway geometries, signal phasing, speed, travel delay, freedom to maneuver, and safety. LOS provides an index to the operational qualities of an intersection. LOS designations range from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F representing the worst. LOS designation is reported differently for signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Table 4–2 provides a description of the levels of service from A through F. Table 4–3 summarizes the criteria, which are based on the average control delay for the worst minor street movement (unsignalized intersections) and overall intersection (signalized intersections).

4.1 Unsignalized Operations Evaluation
For unsignalized intersections, LOS is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. For All-Way-Stop-controlled (AWSC) intersections, the overall intersection delay is reported. For two-way-stop-controlled (MSSC) intersections, LOS is not defined for the overall intersection, but the worst-case movement (typically the minor street left-turn) delay and LOS are reported.

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 15 4.2 Signal Operations Evaluation
Level of service (LOS) for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and loss of travel time. Specifically, LOS criteria are stated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle for the peak 15-minute period within the hour analyzed. The average control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, and final acceleration time in addition to the stop delay. In the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition, LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. The LOS analysis provides results in seconds of delay expressed in terms of letters A through F. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time.

TABLE 4–2

LOS DESCRIPTIONS
LOS Description
A Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop.

B Operations with good progression but with some restricted movement.

C Operations where a significant number of vehicles are stopping with some backup and light congestion.

D Operations where congestion is noticeable, longer delays occur, and many vehicles stop. The proportion of vehicles not stopping declines
E Operations where there is significant delay, extensive queuing, and poor progression.

F Operations that is unacceptable to most drivers, when the arrival rates exceed the capacity of the intersection.

TABLE 4–3

INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) & DELAY RANGES
LOS Delay (seconds/vehicle)
Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0
B 10.1 to 20.0 10.1 to 15.0
C 20.1 to 35.0 15.1 to 25.0
D 35.1 to 55.0 25.1 to 35.0
E 55.1 to 80.0 35.1 to 50.0
F ≥ 80.1 ≥ 50.1
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition

LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers LLG Ref. 3-23-3841 SR-86 / Countryside Drive ICE
N:\3841 - Willow Bend\ICE Report\Report\1. Dec 2024\Dec 3-2024 SR 86-Countryside Drive ICE Report - Clean.docx 16 4.3 Roundabout Operations Evaluation
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board establishes procedures to evaluate highway facilities and rate their ability to process traffic volumes. The terminology "level of service" is used to provide a qualitative evaluation based on certain quantitative calculations, which are related to empirical values. NCHRP Report 1043, Guide for Roundabouts, 2023 (Roundabout Guide) provides the methodology for calculating the Level of Service (LOS) for yield-controlled roundabouts. Table 4–4 displays the LOS thresholds for roundabouts presented in the HCM 6th Edition. If the V/C is greater than 1.0, the LOS is F.

TABLE 4–4

LOS CRITERIA FOR ROUNDABOUT INTERSECTIONS
Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) Level of Service by Volume to Capacity Ratio

<10.0 A
>10.0 and <15.0 B
>15.0 and <25.0 C
>25.0 and <35.0 D
>35.0 and <50.0 E
>50.0 F

Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 22, Page 22-9, Exhibit 22-8.