Agenda — El Monte City Council, February 15, 2022

LOCATION:

El Monte City Hall – East
City Council Chambers
11333 Valley Boulevard
El Monte, CA 91731
DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday,
February 15, 2022
6:00 p.m.

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE
MEETING JOINTLY AND REGULARLY WITH THE EL MONTE HOUSING AUTHORITY; EL MONTE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY; EL MONTE WATER AUTHORITY; EL MONTE PARKING AUTHORITY; SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER EL MONTE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY; AND, FROM TIME TO TIME, SUCH OTHER BODIES OF

THE CITY WHOSE MEMBERSHIP IS COMPOSED EXCLUSIVELY OF THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITY

COUNCIL
COUNCILMEMBERS/AUTHORITY MEMBERS:

Jessica Ancona, Mayor
♦ Alma D. Puente, Mayor Pro Tem ♦ Martin R. Herrera, Councilmember ♦ Victoria Martinez Muela, Councilmember ♦ Dr. Maria Morales, Councilmember This meeting shall be conducted in compliance with the procedures set forth under AB361 which allows local legislative bodies to continue conducting virtual meetings under certain emergency circumstances without strictly complying with traditional Brown Act teleconferencing requirements, so long as there is a live comment option for public comments, meetings are paused for any technical difficulties that affect public participation, and each agenda contains information on how to access the meeting as well as how to participate in public comment virtually. The El Monte City Council (“City Council”) has availed itself of the procedures of AB361 for this meeting by resolution last approved at its meeting of February 1, 2022. To mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and subject to the public’s right to participate in the manner described below, City Hall and the City Council Chambers will be closed to members of the public for this meeting.

Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in any of the following ways:
(1) Turn your TV to Channel 3; or
(2) City’s website at http://www.elmonteca.gov/378/Council-Meeting-Videos; or (3) In person.

Persons wishing to offer public comment for this meeting may do so:
(1) By directly addressing the City Council in person at the time(s) allotted on the agenda for such comment. Persons wishing to address the City Council in person are asked to fill-out a blue speaker card providing their name and indicating whether they wish to address the Council on an item(s) of business appearing under (i) the Closed Session portion of the agenda; (ii) the Public Hearing portion City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 2 of 18 ends

of the agenda; (iii) any item of business appearing under any other portion of the agenda; and/or (iv) a non-agendized matter that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Speaker cards should be submitted to the City Clerk or the Sergeant at Arms (a uniformed El Monte Police Officer) before the City Council’s approval of the agenda, if possible; or (2) By calling-in to the conference line at (888) 204-5987; Code 8167975 by or before any of the specific times allotted on the agenda for public comment. At each point of the agenda at which public comment is received, the City Council, through the presiding officer, will ask the City Clerk if there are any members of the public who have called in who wish to address the City Council on a particular matter or grouping of matters. When calling in, members of the public shall inform the attendant which item(s) of business they wish to speak on, and callers will be connected by telephone when the time for commenting on such items is commenced.

As described in greater detail below, members of the public may address the City Council (i) on agendized closed session items of business prior to the City Council going into closed session; (ii) on items of business listed under the heading Public Hearings when the public hearing on the item the speaker/caller wishes to speak on is opened; and (iii) on all other items of agendized and non-agendized business during the portion of the agenda entitled General Public Comment. The City Council shall be under no obligation to entertain comments from persons who (i) submit a speaker card after the City Council closes the applicable commenting period; or (ii) call-in after the City Council closes the applicable commenting period. With this in mind, speakers are strongly encouraged to submit cards or call in as early as possible to avoid missing the opportunity to speak. The City Council shall be under no obligation to respond to or deliberate upon any specific questions or comments posed by a speaker or take action on any issue raised by a speaker beyond such action as the City Council may be lawfully authorized to take on an agendized matter pursuant to the Brown Act (Govt. Code Section 54950 et seq.)(“Brown Act”) Members of the City Council may provide brief clarifying responses to any comment made or questions posed. Persons who wish to address the City Council are asked to state their name and address for the record. Speakers may not lend any portion of their speaking time to other persons or borrow additional time from other persons. All comments or queries presented by a speaker/caller shall be addressed to the City Council as a body and not to any specific member thereof.

No questions shall be posed to any member of the City Council except through the presiding official of the meeting, the Mayor and/or Chair. The City Council may not engage in any sort of prolonged discussion or deliberation with any speaker or group of speakers on matters that are not listed on this agenda, nor may the City Council take action an any non-agendized items of business, except as specifically authorized under the Brown Act.

Enforcement of Decorum: The Chief of Police, or such member, or members of the Police Department as the Chief of Police may designate, shall serve as the Sergeant-at-Arms of any City Council meeting.

The Sergeant-at-Arms shall carry out all orders and instructions given by the presiding official for the purpose of maintaining order and decorum at the meeting. While members of the public are free to level criticism of City policies and the action(s) or proposed action(s) of the City Council or its members, members of the public may not engage in behavior that is disruptive to the orderly conduct of the proceedings, including, but not limited to, conduct that prevents other members of the public from being heard when it is their opportunity to speak or which prevents members of the audience from hearing or seeing the proceedings; speaking off topic or speaking beyond the speakers allotted time limit. Members of the public may not threaten any person with physical harm or act in a manner that may reasonably be interpreted as an imminent threat of physical harm. All persons participating in the meeting must adhere to the City’s policy barring harassment based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, or age.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 3 of 18 ends

Instruction regarding accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act can be found on the last page of this Agenda.

1. CALL TO ORDER:

2. ROLL CALL FOR CITY COUNCIL AND AUTHORITY BODIES:

Jessica Ancona, Mayor/Chair
Alma D. Puente, Mayor Pro Tem/Authority Member
Martin R. Herrera, Councilmember/Authority Member
Victoria Martinez Muela, Councilmember/Authority Member Dr. Maria Morales, Councilmember/Authority Member

3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA:

4. CLOSED SESSION:

The City Council and the various legislative bodies whose membership is composed exclusively of the membership of the City Council will attempt to address and complete all Closed Session business between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. If the City Council completes all Closed Session business prior to 7:00 p.m., the City Council will take a short recess and commence all Open Session proceedings promptly at 7:00 p.m. In the event the City Council is unable to address or complete all agendized Closed Session items by 7:00 p.m., the City Council will hear all such remaining items toward the end of the meeting, immediately following Council Communications. Should any member of the public wish to address the City Council on any agendized Closed Session matter, the City Council shall allow such person to address the City Council on such matter(s) prior to going into Closed Session, provided that all persons wishing to address the Council on an agendized Closed Session matter shall (i) call-in or submit a speaker card in the manner prescribed on page 1 of this agenda, above, prior to the City Council going into closed session; and (ii) be subject to a single speaker time allotment of three (3) continuous minutes total per speaker to address the City Council on any or all closed session items of business.

4.1 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9(a), (d)(2) and (e)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation – One (1) Matter.

4.2 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 – Conference with Real Property Negotiator.

Property Location:
3454-3456 Tyler Avenue and 11016 Ramona Boulevard, El Monte, California Name of Party City is Negotiating with:

Newport Partners, LLC

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 4 of 18 ends

City’s Designated Negotiators:

Alma Martinez, City Manager; Betty Donavanik, Community and Economic Development Director; Jason Mikaelian, Community and Economic Deputy Director; and Lloyd Pilchen, Assistant City Attorney
Under Discussion:

Both Price and Terms.

4.3 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), 54956.9(c), 54956.9(d)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation – FEAH, LLC vs.

City of El Monte, LASC Case No. 20STCP03720.

4.4 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), 54956.9(c), 54956.9(d)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation – Dronatherapy, LLC vs. City of El Monte, LASC Case No. 20STCP04067.

4.5 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), 54956.9(c), 54956.9(d)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation – Nibble This, LLC vs. City of El Monte, LASC Case No. 20STCP04044.

4.6 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), 54956.9(c), 54956.9(d)(1) – Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation – CaliMed Baldwin, LLC vs. City of El Monte, LASC Case No. 20STCP03134.

4.7 Closed Session Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 – Conference with Labor Negotiators.

Bargaining Units Subject to Negotiations: El Monte General Unit (SEIU Local 721); El Monte General Mid-Management Unit (SEIU Local 721); El Monte Police Officers Association; El Monte Police Mid-Manager’s Association; and All Unrepresented Employees of City Executive Team.

City’s Designated Negotiator: Alma K. Martinez, City Manager and John Nguyen, Human Resources/Risk Management Director.

OPEN SESSION PROCEEDINGS
(Commencing at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the City Council reconvene from Closed Session/Short Recess).

5. INVOCATION: City Council.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 5 of 18 ends

6. FLAG SALUTE: City Council.

7. RECOGNITIONS, HONORS AND COMMUNITY INTEREST PRESENTATIONS:

8. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT:

This time has been set aside for members of the public to directly address the City Council on agendized items of business (other than those agendized as public hearing or closed session items) or on any other matter of interest to the speaker/caller that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council, the Housing Authority, the Financing Authority and/or the Water Authority (collectively, the “Council”). Each speaker/caller will be limited to a single allotment of three (3) continuous minutes total to address the Council on any or all matters covered by this section. As explained more specifically under the Public Hearing portion of this agenda, members of the public wishing to offer comment on items of business agendized under the Public Hearing portion of the agenda shall have a separate allotment of three (3) continuous minutes per speaker per public hearing item. Except as otherwise provided under the Brown Act (Gov. Code Section 54950 et seq.), the Council may not deliberate or take action upon any matter not listed on this posted agenda but may order that any such matter be placed on the agenda for a subsequent meeting. The Council may also direct staff to investigate certain matters for consideration at a future meeting. Persons wishing to address the Council on matters covered under General Public Comment shall call in or submit a speaker card in the manner prescribed on page 1 of this agenda, above, by or before the General Public Comment portion of the agenda is closed. The City Council shall be under no obligation to entertain comments from speakers/callers who submit cards or call in to speak on matters covered by the section after the General Public Comment portion of the agenda is closed.

9. CITY TREASURER’S REPORT:

10. DEMAND RESOLUTION NO. D-659

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA,

ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AND SPECIFYING THE FUNDS OUT OF WHICH THE SAME ARE TO BE PAID.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the attached list of claims and demands totaling $3,781,785.56 have been examined by the City Treasurer and that warrant numbers 1103738 through 1104142, and the payroll period January 1, 2022 through January 15, 2022 inclusive are hereby allowed in the amounts and ordered paid out of the respective funds as set forth.

11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting Minutes of January 25, 2022; and Regular Meeting Minutes of February 1, 2022.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 6 of 18 ends

12. CONSENT CALENDAR:

All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine in nature and may be enacted by one motion approving the recommendation listed on the Agenda. One or more items may be removed from the Consent Calendar so that they may be discussed, considered, and voted upon individually by the Council. A matter may be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up separately by way of a seconded motion of any member of the Council with the approval of a majority of the Council quorum.

12.1 Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s).

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approval to waive full reading (except title) of all ordinances appearing on the City Council agenda as authorized under Government Code Section 36934, unless otherwise directed by the City Council.

Total Cost: N/A Account No: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A

12.2 Approval of a Resolution Authorizing the Submittal of a Grant Application, Payment Programs, and Related Authorizations Administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery for the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the submittal of a Grant Application, Payment Programs, and related authorizations administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery for the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program.

Total Cost: N/A Account No: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A
Resolution No. 10336

12.3 Approval of a Resolution Approving Final Tract Map No. 82382 for the 14-Unit MultiFamily Residential Development Subdivision and Fire Lane Designation at 4123-4131 Peck Road.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 7 of 18 ends

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and adopt a Resolution authorizing the recordation of Final Tract Map No. 82382 for the 14-unit multi-family residential development subdivision and fire lane designation on private property located at 4123-4131 Peck Road.

Total Cost: N/A Account No.: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A
Resolution No. 10337

12.4 Approval of a Resolution Adopting the El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and approve a Resolution adopting the El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan.

Total Cost: N/A Account No.: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A
Resolution No. 10338

12.5 Approval for the Purchase of Five (5) New Vehicles for the Police Department.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and approve the appropriation of Unclaimed Money, General Funds, Asset Forfeiture funding to purchase five (5) new vehicles for patrol use in an amount not-toexceed $350,000;

2. Consider and approve the purchase of the vehicles from one (1) of the three (3) contacted dealership; and

3. Consider and approve the disposition of the five (5) Police Department vehicles.

Total Cost: $350,000 Account No.: 100-71-711-8132
General Fund
259-71-712-8132
Asset Forfeiture
100-71-4733
Is the cost of this item budgeted? No Unclaimed Money Fund City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 8 of 18 ends

12.6 Consideration and Approval to Authorize a $2.2 Million Loan to Prima Development a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation for Predevelopment Costs Related to the Proposed Affordable Housing and Mixed Use Development of A 6.11 Acre Portion of the Maclaren Hall Property Owned by the County of Los Angeles, Located at 4024 Durfee Avenue, Utilizing American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds Previously Allocated by City Council for Development of the Site and to Authorize the City Manager to Make All Conforming Edits, Finalize, and Execute in Final Form the Predevelopment Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Assignment of Agreements, Plans and Specifications.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution authorizing a Predevelopment Loan of $2.2 million to Prima Development for costs related to predevelopment work for the proposed affordable housing and mixed-use development of a 6.11-acre portion of the MacLaren Hall property owned by the County of Los Angeles, located at 4024 Durfee Avenue from $2.6 million of ARPA funds previously allocated by the City Council for development of the site; and

2. Approve the terms and authorize the City Manager, or her designee to make all conforming edits, finalize, and execute in final form the Predevelopment Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Assignment of Agreements, Plans and Specifications (together, “Loan Documents”) by and between the City of El Monte and Prima Development to effectuate the loan.

Total Cost: $2,200,000 Account No: ARPA
Is the cost of this item budgeted? Yes
Resolution No. 10339

13. PUBLIC HEARINGS:

Members of the public wishing to address the Council on any item of business agendized under this Public Hearing portion of the agenda are asked to call in or submit a speaker card in the manner prescribed on page 1 of this agenda, above, by or before the time at which the City Council closes the public comment portion of each public hearing matter listed under this section. The City Council shall be under no obligation to entertain comments from speakers/callers who submit cards or call in after the public comment portion of the public hearing matter they wish to speak on has been closed. Each speaker will be allotted three (3) continuous minutes per Public Hearing item.

13.1 A Public Hearing to Consider and Approve an Amendment to a Previously Approved Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement (DDA) and Related Documents with Newport Partners, LLC for the Construction of a 51-Unit Affordable Housing Development on a 0.83-Acre Site Located at 3436 & 3454 Tyler Avenue and 11016 Ramona Boulevard.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 9 of 18 ends

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Open the public hearing;

2. Receive presentation from staff;

3. Pose questions to staff;

4. Allow members of the public to offer comment;

5. Pose follow up questions to staff;

6. Close the public hearing;

7. Approve the proposed Resolution and addendum by no less than three (3) affirmative votes; and

8. Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute all documents necessary to effectuate the intent and purpose of the Resolution.

Total Cost: N/A Account No.: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A
Resolution No. 10340

14. REGULAR AGENDA:

14.1 Consideration and Approval of a Purchase Order with Quinn Cat for Major Repairs to PW-46 2008 Caterpillar 924H for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $33,000.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and approve a Purchase Order with Quinn CAT for major repair to PW-46 2008 Caterpillar 924H for a total not-to-exceed amount of $33,000.

Total Cost: $33,000 Account No.: 100-67-675-6335 - $18,000 General Fund
600-67-696-6335 - $7,500
Water Authority Fund
650-67-673-6335
Is the cost of this item budgeted? Yes Sewer Fund

14.2 Consideration and Approval of Recommendation to Use Asset Forfeiture Funds for Overtime Costs for Members of the Police Department Detective Bureau.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 10 of 18 ends

1. Consider and approve the use of Asset Forfeiture Funds from Account No. 259-71-711- 5132 in an amount not-to-exceed $150,000 for overtime expenditures related to addressing urgent critical investigations.

Total Cost: $150,000 Account No.: 259-71-711-5132
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A Asset Forfeiture

14.3 Consideration and Approval of a Resolution Updating the Citywide Classification and Compensation Plan and Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 10326.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and approve the attached Resolution updating the Citywide Classification and Compensation Plan, effective February 16, 2022.

Total Cost: $307,700 Account No: Various
Is the cost of this item budgeted? No (Part of Mid-Year Budget Amendments) Resolution No. 10341

14.4 Consideration and Approval of a Bench List of Firms for Housing Consultant Services and Approval of a Master Professional Services Agreement with the Three (3) Selected Firms.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve the selection of three (3) firms, Avant Garde, Inc., RSG, Inc., and Ramona Property Managers, Inc. to serve on the City of El Monte’s bench list of Housing Consultants for on-call housing administration, technical assistance, affordable housing, and property management services; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute a Master Professional Services Agreement with the three (3) selected consulting firms.

Total Cost: $143,100 Account No: HCD CDBG-CV (Fund 214) PHLA (Fund 215)
Homekey (Fund 216)
CDBG & CDBG-CV (Fund 220)
HOME & HOME ARP (Fund 221)
ESG & ESG-CV (Fund 253)
Is the cost of this item budgeted? Yes Housing Assets (Fund 227) City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 11 of 18 ends

14.5 Consideration of Request of TDF, LP (Pacific Towers Affordable Senior Citizen Rental Housing Project) for Approval by the City of El Monte as Successor Agency to the Former El Monte Community Redevelopment Agency Approving Various Actions in Furtherance of TDF, LP’s Refinancing of the Pacific Towers Project.

This staff report has been prepared for the joint consideration and action of the City Council and the City Council serving as the governing board of the Successor Agency to the Former El Monte Community Redevelopment Agency.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Re-authorize the proposed refinancing (“2022 Refinancing”) for the Pacific Towers Project to proceed in accordance with the conditions set forth in the proposed Resolution, as the date for Closing set forth in Resolution No. SA-82 did not occur and the Resolution became null and void, and TDF, LP is requesting additional City approvals in furtherance of the Refinancing;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Refinancing documents as referenced in the proposed Resolution on behalf of the City, together with such technical and conforming changes as recommended by the City Manager and the City Attorney;

3. Approve the East West Bank Assignment transferring beneficial interests it holds in the Successor Agency Loans by virtue of a transfer of the beneficial interests by the former El Monte Community Redevelopment Agency to East West Bank under a “Collateral Assignment of Beneficial Interest Under Deeds of Trust” recorded on March 24, 2002, as Instrument No. 04069835, back to the City;

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate form of subordination agreements required by TDF’s lender subordinating the Special Project Construction Reserve Loan and various other Project agreements applicable to the Successor Agency Loans in furtherance of the 2022 Refinancing as such subordination agreements shall be prepared by the City Attorney and TDF’s lender in a form consistent with the 2022 Refinancing and the proposed Resolution;

5. Authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate form of a Deed of Trust for the Special Project Construction Reserve Loan as such Deed of Trust shall be prepared by the City Attorney in a form consistent with the 2022 Refinancing and the proposed Resolution;

6. Authorize the City Manager to execute the appropriate form of amendment to the promissory note payable by TDF, LP to the City as Successor Agency under the Special Project Construction Reserve Loan as such amendment to the promissory note shall be prepared by the City Attorney in a form consistent with the 2022 Refinancing and the proposed Resolution;

7. Authorize the City Manager to execute Reconveyances on the Long-Term Loan and the GAP Loan made by the City as Successor Agency to TDF, LP, which are to be paid off from the 2022 Refinancing as such Reconveyances shall be prepared by the City Attorney in a form consistent with the 2022 Refinancing and the proposed Resolution;

8. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute such ancillary loan refinancing documents as may be approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney in order to cause the 2022 Refinancing of the Project to be accomplished in accordance with the conditions set forth in the proposed City Resolution; and City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 12 of 18 ends

9. Adopt the attached Resolution which confirms Recommended Actions 1-8, above, inclusive.

Total Cost: N/A Account No: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A
Resolution No. 10342

14.6 Consideration and Approval of an Agreement for Professional Consulting Services with Elevate Public Affairs in Connection with the City of El Monte’s Effort to Transition to By-District Elections and Approval of Related Budgetary Authorizations in Connection with the Same.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Approve a professional services agreement with Elevate Public Affairs to provide professional consulting services for the City’s proposed districting effort for a contract amount not-to-exceed $70,0000 plus a contingency budget of 25% of the contract in the event the City finds it prudent to avail itself of certain optional and supplemental outreach services; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to make all conforming edits, finalize, and execute the professional services agreement.

Total Cost: $87,500 Account No: 100-21-232-6111
Is the cost of this item budgeted? Yes

14.7 Consideration and Approval of Recommendation to Award and Enter Into Vehicle Towing and Secured Storage Services Agreements with Haddick’s Towing, Inc., and Royal Coaches Auto Body & Towing for a Term of Five (5) Years with an Option for Two (2), One-Year Extensions.

RECOMMENDATION OF BUSINESS ITEM UNDER CONSIDERATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Consider and approve a Vehicle Towing and Secured Storage Services Agreement by and between the City of El Monte and Haddick’s Towing, Inc. for a term of five (5) years with an option for two (2), one-year extensions; and

2. Consider and approve a Vehicle Towing and Secured Storage Services Agreement by and between the City of El Monte and Royal Coaches Auto Body & Towing for a term of five (5) years with an option for two (2), one-year extensions; or

3. In the event that the City Council does not take action on recommendation #1 or recommendation #2, it is recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare and execute a contract amendment with Royal Coaches Auto Body & Towing, Inc. to provide City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 13 of 18 ends

month-to-month services based on the same terms as the Master Agreement dated December 19, 2019.

Total Cost: $0 Account No: N/A
Is the cost of this item budgeted? N/A

15. CITY ATTORNEY’S AGENDA:

15.1 Presentation Regarding Supplemental Measures and Strategies for the Management and Restriction of Cannabis Business Activities in the City.

15.2 Update and Continuing Discussion Regarding Development of City Council Meeting Procedures.

Recommendation: That the City Council continue its discussion and deliberation on the development and refinement of parliamentary procedures for City Council meetings and provide the City Attorney with direction regarding the drafting of such procedures for future consideration.

16. CITY MANAGER’S AGENDA:

17. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:

18. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/REPORTS:
18A. Mayor Ancona
18A.1 Update on Council Chambers Audio System.
18A.2 Update on Chamber of Commerce Contract.

18B. Mayor Pro Tem Puente

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 14 of 18 ends

18C. Councilman Herrera
18C.1 Update from Public Works on the Status of Street Light Conditions on Garvey Boulevard and Santa Anita Avenue and City Limits.
18D. Councilwoman Martinez Muela
18D.1 Discussion and Action on Smoke Free Outdoor Ordinance, Discussed March 2021.
18D.2 Discussion and Action Regarding Directing City Management to Hire an Assistant City Manager, Public Information Officer and Establish a Purchasing Department, Discussed April 2021.
18D.3 Discussion and Action Regarding Citywide Employee Survey of Workplace Satisfaction and Recommendations, Discussed February 2021. 18D.4 Update on Federal and State Funding for Project Homekey. 18D.5 Update on Funding for All Park Renovations.
18D.6 Presentation by the City Council Proclaiming the Month of March 2022 as Women’s History Month.
18E. Councilwoman Dr. Morales
18E.1 Discussion on Community Based Policing and Crime Statistics/Updates.

18E.2 Discussion Regarding the Creation of a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Program Coordinator, a New Position to Support the City’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 15 of 18 ends

19. ADJOURNMENT:

The next Regular Meeting of the City Council will be held on March 1, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. This Agenda will be posted on the City’s website, www.ci.el-monte.ca.us, and physically posted no less than 72 hours prior to the start of the subject regular meeting. Although it is the City’s practice and desire to electronically post a copy of this Agenda along with supporting material as part of its website posting, the size or formatting of certain supporting materials may render their website posting infeasible.

Nevertheless, all supporting materials related to any item on this Agenda, that is made available to the members of the council may be inspected by members of the public at the City Clerk’s Office located at 11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 am – 5:30 pm. For more information, please call the City Clerk’s Office at 626-580-2016.

All public meetings and events sponsored or conducted by the City of El Monte are held in sites accessible to persons with disabilities. Requests for accommodations may be made by calling the office of the City Clerk at (626) 580-2016 at least three (3) working days prior to the event, if possible.

This Agenda and copies of documents distributed at the meeting are available in alternative formats upon request.

Posted: February 12, 2022 at 2:30 p.m.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 16 of 18 ends

AGENDA CALENDAR 2022

CITY OF EL MONTE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH
SnapHEALTHCARE & LA COUNTY SUPERVISOR

HILDA SOLIS
COVID-19 PCR TESTING SITES

MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS & FRIDAYS
Zamora Park
8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
3820 Penn Mar Ave, El Monte
Beginning January 31, 2022

THURSDAYS
Arceo Park
6:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m.
3125 Tyler Avenue, El Monte
Beginning January 27, 2022
To Pre-Register: https://qrco.de/bcgJXJ
L.A. CARE & BLUE SHIELD PROMISE

EL MONTE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER

FREE FOOD PANTRY
Wednesdays
1:00 p.m – 4:00 p.m.

Community Resource Center
3570 Santa Anita Avenue, El Monte
Walk-ins welcome – no appointment needed.

COVID-19

EL MONTE TESTING CENTERS
Monday Aquatic Center 11001 Mildred St. (on Mildred Street) 1:00 p.m.-7:00 p.m.

Tuesday Mt. View Park 12127 Elliott Ave. (Elliott Parking Lot) 12:00 p.m.– 6:00 p.m.

Wednesday Fletcher Park 3404 Fletcher Park Way (In parking lot) 11:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.

Thursday Gibson Mariposa Park 4140 Gibson Road (In parking lot) 12:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.

Friday Lambert Park 11431 McGirk Ave. (In parking lot)
12:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 17 of 18 ends

AGENDA CALENDAR 2022
COVID-19

EL MONTE RAPID TESTING CENTERS
Wednesday – Lambert Park 11431 McGirk Ave (In parking lot) 9:00 a.m.- 6:00 p.m.

RAPID TESTING ONLY ON WEDNESDAYS AT LAMBERT PARK.

NEW TESTING SITES TO BE ANNOUNCED.

FREE COVID-19 VACCINATIONS
12:00 P.M. – 7:00 P.M.

Every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday

LA METRO EL MONTE
3501 Santa Anita Avenue, El Monte
Schedule your appointment at: vaccine.fulgentgenetics.com For more information please contact: publichealth.lacounty.gov CITY OF EL MONTE & EAST VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC PROVIDING COVID-19 VACCINES TO LA COUNTY RESIDENTS 18 AND OLDER
1ST Dose appointments can be made at https://emvaccine.c-rep.co/ 2nd Dose appointment can be made during your first dose 15-minute observation period or by visiting https://emvaccine.c.rep.co/
The link is updated on a weekly basis to reflect upcoming appointment availability.

CITY OF EL MONTE COVID-19 RENT RELIEF PROGRAM
Financial assistance for rent and utilizes to income-eligible California renters and their landlords who have been impacted by COVID-19.

Both renters and landlords can apply for assistance.

For more information or to apply, call 1-833-687-0967.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES & NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES – THE

CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY
Foreclosure Prevention & Mortgage Relief Program
Program eligible applicants can receive up to $20,000.00 to help offset mortgage delinquencies For more information and to sign up for the upcoming workshops:
nhslacounty.org/mortgagereliefprogram
1-888-895-2647
Applications accepted beginning April 12, 2022
CITY OF EL MONTE PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES COVID-19 VACCINE REGISTRATION ASSISTANCE FOR RESIDENTS 65 & OLDER If you are 65 or older and need assistance registering, please contact the Jack Crippen Senior Center at 626- 580-2210
Appointments Are Limited
VACCINATELACOUNTY.COM
City Council Meeting of February 15, 2022
El Monte City Council ♦ El Monte Housing Authority ♦ El Monte Financing Authority ♦ El Monte Parking Authority ♦ El Monte Water Authority

Page 18 of 18 ends

AGENDA CALENDAR 2022

CITY OF EL MONTE PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES

DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAM To register for the program or schedule an appointment please contact the Jack Crippen Multipurpose Senior Center at 626-580-2210
This program provides information on public benefits, legal referrals and assistance for families residing in the City of El Monte.

Eligibility Requirements: El Monte Resident and must meet Income Guidelines SUN. – FEB. 13TH 11:30 A.M. – 2:30 P.M.

DOWNTOWN EL MONTE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION – LUNAR NEW YEAR 2022: YEAR OF THE TIGER CELEBRATION
Main Street
For more information: [email protected]
TUE. – FEB. 15TH 6:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION
7:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
El Monte City Hall Council Chamber
11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte
TUE. – FEB. 16TH 6:00 P.M.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
El Monte City Hall Council Chamber
11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte
View remotely: TV - Channel 3
http://www.elmonteca.gov/378/Council-Meeting-Videos

CITY OF EL MONTE PUBLIC HEARING
TO RECEIVE PUBLIC TESTIMONY AND COMMENT PER ELECTION CODE 10010

REGARDING POSSIBLE CHANGES TO THE WAY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ARE

ELECTED BY EL MONTE VOTERS
2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
P NET PAY 1/1/22 ‐ 1/15/22 1,507,445.22
P Payroll Total 1,507,445.22
P AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE 12314 1103738 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 SEC. 125 DEPENDENT CARE: PAYMENT 3,503.89 3,503.89 P CALIF STATE DISBURSEMENT/UNIT 04723 0125202213 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 3,698.50 3,698.50 P CATALYST CORPORATE FEDERAL CU 04610 0125202207 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 EL MONTE CREDIT UNION: PAYMENT 46,556.28 46,556.28 P CITY OF EL MONTE 04622 1103739 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 GARNISHMENT FEE/LOAN: PAYMENT 138.33 138.33 P DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 04731 0125202201 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 FEDERAL TAX: PAYMENT 283,551.15 P DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY 04732 0125202202 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 MEDICARE TAX: PAYMENT 63,127.06 346,678.21 P EL MONTE CITY EMPLOYEES CR UN 06796 0125202212 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 CREDIT UNION YARD ACCOUNT: PAYMENT 232.00 P EL MONTE CITY EMPLOYEES CR UN 04613 0125202214 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 POLICE CREDIT UNION: PAYMENT 105.00 337.00 P EL MONTE POLICE ASSOCIATION 04631 1103740 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 ADMINISTRATOR PD DUES: PAYMENT 9,958.88 P EL MONTE POLICE ASSOCIATION 04630 1103741 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 LONG TERM DISABILITY ‐ POLICE: PAYMENT 1,543.71 11,502.59 P EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 04730 0125202204 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 STATE WITHOLDING TAX: PAYMENT 111,510.49 111,510.49 P FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 04616 1103742 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 STATE OF CAL FRAN TAX BOARD: PAYMENT 150.00 150.00 P LA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. 08162 1103743 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF DEP: PAYMENT 3,223.42 3,223.42P NATIONAL DEFERRED 04633 0125202203 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 PART TIME DEF. COMPENSATION: PAYMENT 4,553.87 4,553.87 P NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 11991 0125202206 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 401 (A) EXECUTIVE PLAN: PAYMENT 7,365.01 P NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 04635 0125202208 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 457 DEFERRED COMP CITY EMPLOYEES: PAYMENT 64,701.99 72,067.00 P PARS SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT 03734 0125202210 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 PARS SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT: PAYMENT 17,185.44 17,185.44 P PERS LONG TERM CARE PROGRAM 04612 1103744 1/25/2022 P/E:01/15/22 1/25/2022 LONG TERM CARE‐MID MANAGEMENT: PAYMENT 470.04 470.04 P PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 03047 1002014776 12/30/2021 P/E: 11/30/21 12/9/2021 PENSION PLAN (PERS): PAYMENT 320,973.70 P PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT 03047 1002025465 1/14/2022 P/E: 12/15/21 12/23/2021 PENSION PLAN (PERS): PAYMENT 340,753.49 661,727.19 P SEIU LOCAL #721 04628 0125202205 1/25/2022 P/E: 01/15/22 1/25/2022 SEIU DUES, FEES, COPE: PAYMENT 7,406.38 7,406.38 P Payroll Vendor Total 1,290,708.63
O ARROYO 12946 1104029 2/3/2022 178495 1/24/2022 REFUND FACILITY DAMAGE DEPOSIT 12.09.21 ANNUAL TAMA 200.00 200.00 O BAUTISTA 12076 1104035 2/3/2022 189368 1/24/2022 REFUND FACILITY DAMAGE DEPOSIT 12.11.21 BIRTHDAY CEL 250.00 250.00O CHAN 14075 1104044 2/3/2022 Ref000357645 2/1/2022 UB Refund Cst #00066230 35.51 35.51 O FULGENT THERAPEUTICS, LLC 09555 1104060 2/3/2022 192234 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 11,000.00 11,000.00 O GARCIA EQUIPMENT 14073 1104061 2/3/2022 Ref000357643 2/1/2022 UB Refund Cst #00056554 65.17 65.17 O HO 14074 1104065 2/3/2022 Ref000357644 2/1/2022 UB Refund Cst #00064330 30.83 30.83 O One Time Vendor Total 11,581.51
R ACOSTA 00434 1103799 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R ADMINSURE INC 01261 1104026 2/3/2022 14552 10/15/2021 NOV 2021 WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRAT 15,914.00 15,914.00 R AGUIRRE 10431 1103800 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R ALVA 08000 1103801 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R ALVAREZ, ANTHONY 05577 1103802 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R ALVAREZ, ANTONIO 03271 1103803 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 01329 1104027 2/3/2022 ORDER # 7001981837 11/28/2021 MEMBER # 00432975 TERM 03/01/22‐02/28/23 MEMBERSHI 473.00 473.00 R ANCHETA 03236 1103804 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R ANDREOLI 03260 1103805 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R ANGEL & LESLIE'S REGLAZING 14084 1104028 2/3/2022 01.18.22 1/18/2022 REGLAZING 9 BATH TUBS ‐ PW 2,700.00 2,700.00

Page 1 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R ANKENY 03239 1103806 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,750.00 1,750.00 R ANTONITIS 05580 1103807 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R ARELLANO, SARA 03286 1103808 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 579.01 579.01 R ARELLANO, THEODORE 03270 1103809 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R ARMSTRONG, AARON 11671 1103810 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R ARMSTRONG, THOMAS 07045 1103811 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,586.49 1,586.49 R ARRIETA 13736 1103812 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R AT & T 01391 1103745 1/27/2022 414154‐01/22 1/1/2022 AC#337 841‐4154 (01/01/22 ‐ 01/31/22 ) ‐ PD 178.96 R AT & T 01391 1103745 1/27/2022 266372‐01/22 1/1/2022 AC#250 626‐6372 (01/01/22 ‐ 01/31/22) ‐ PD 20.57 R AT & T 01394 1103746 1/27/2022 9391063195‐01/22 1/1/2022 BILL PAYER (BAN) 9391063195 INV#17554925 (VOIP) 3,584.56 R AT & T 01394 1104030 2/3/2022 9391026243‐ 01/22 1/13/2022 BILL PAYER (BAN) 9391026243 INV#17620154 2,865.85 R AT & T 01395 1104031 2/3/2022 9391069640‐01/22 1/10/2022 BILL PAYER (BAN) 9391069640 INV#17591139 ‐ CHW ELEVATO 25.50 R AT & T 10324 1104032 2/3/2022 287493117‐01/22 1/20/2022 AC#287493117 (01/21/22‐ 02/20/22) SCADA ‐ WATER DIV. 90.95 6,766.39 R AUGUST JR 03298 1103813 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 96.43 96.43R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7390 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 889, CIP 890 ACTIVE COMMUTE, SANTA 2,225.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7395 12/28/2021 MAY ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 846 SHARED PARKING PROG ‐ ENG. 2,082.50 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7397 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 040 HSIP CYCLE 10 ‐ ENG. 2,030.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7394 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 031 MEASURE M ELLIOT CLASS III BIKE L 1,740.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7393 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 027 STREET BEAUTIFICATION ‐ ENG. 926.25 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7398 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 884 GARVEY STORM DRAIN RECONSTRU 807.50 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7392 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 805 RAMONA / VALLEY BLVD INTERSECT 3,145.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7389 12/28/2021 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 TRAFFIC CALMING PARKWAY DR‐ DENHOLM 665.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103747 1/27/2022 7396 12/28/2022 SEPT ‐ NOV 2021 CIP 016 EL MONTE REGIONAL BICYCLE COM 291.25 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103748 1/27/2022 7353 12/27/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ HUD PROG & FUNIDNG COMP. SVCS ‐ CED 1,795.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1103748 1/27/2022 7300 11/29/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ HUD PROG & FUNIDNG COMP. SVCS ‐ CED 460.00 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1104033 2/3/2022 7301 11/29/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ 3046.01 ESG‐CV ‐ CED 13,283.75 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1104033 2/3/2022 7416 1/24/2022 DEC 2021 ‐ ESG‐CV ‐CED 12,607.50 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1104033 2/3/2022 7354 12/27/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ ESG‐CV ‐CED 10,993.75 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1104033 2/3/2022 7239 10/20/2021 SEPT 2021 ‐ 3046.01 ESG‐ CV ‐ CED 10,753.75 R AVANT‐GARDE INC 11139 1104033 2/3/2022 7415 1/24/2022 DEC 2021 ‐ HUD PROGRAM AND FUNDING COMPLIANCE SVC 1,282.50 65,088.75 R BALLINGER 08690 1103814 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 557.02 557.02 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202201 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/2/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh 499.98 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202201 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#9478 ‐ CMO ‐ Martinez, Alma ‐ Credit (86.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202202 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/3/2021 AC#5088 ‐ Comm Srvcs Div ‐ Zuniga, Jessica 33.08 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202202 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/14/2021 AC#2545 ‐ CMO ‐ Valdivia, Erik ‐ Credit (1.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202202 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/23/2021 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah ‐ Credit (14.29) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202203 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/3/2021 AC#3424 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Ramirez, Teresa 49.38 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202203 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/23/2021 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah ‐ Credit (14.29) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202206 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 351.23 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202207 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah 14.29 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202208 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#0933 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Talamantes, Amy 163.16 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202209 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#2545 ‐ CMO ‐ Valdivia, Erik 10.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202210 1/17/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/7/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 350.40 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202211 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/8/2021 AC#9478 ‐ CMO ‐ Martinez, Alma 201.82

Page 2 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202212 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/9/2021 AC#9478 ‐ CMO ‐ Martinez, Alma 403.64 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202212 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 2022 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ PUB WKS DIV ‐ MENDEZ, SALVADOR ‐ CREDIT (400.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202213 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/9/2021 AC#9478 ‐ CMO ‐ Martinez, Alma 461.46 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202213 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/9/2021 AC#3424 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Ramirez, Teresa ‐ Credit (241.92) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202215 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/10/2021 AC#3638 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Burl, Victoria 30.52 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202216 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 ‐ Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ PUB WKS DIV ‐ MENDEZ, SALVADOR ‐ CREDIT (300.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202216 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/10/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 310.50 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202217 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/13/2021 AC#1151 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Perrine, Randy 118.77 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202218 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/13/2021 AC#3424 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Ramirez, Teresa 109.89 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202220 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/14/2021 AC#2545 ‐ CMO ‐ Valdivia, Erik 1.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202221 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/15/2021 AC#4656 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Ortiz, Christopher 780.22 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202221 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ PUB WKS DIV ‐ MENDEZ, SALVADOR ‐ CREDIT (200.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202221 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/6/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh ‐ Credit (499.98) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202222 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#5088 ‐ Comm Srvcs Div ‐ Zuniga, Jessica 70.39 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202223 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#3455 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Crippen, Sheila 6.99 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202224 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#3588 ‐ CMO ‐ Aguilar, Leticia 135.80 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202225 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 350.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202225 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1965 ‐ PLANNING DIV. ‐ MIKAELIAN, JASON‐ CREDIT (345.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202226 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 36.60 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202227 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#9405 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Drevdahl, Frank 28.47 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202228 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/16/2021 AC#4656 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Ortiz, Christopher 700.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202228 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1965 ‐ Planning Div ‐ Mikaelian, Jason ‐ Credit (699.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202229 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/17/2021 AC#1151 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Perrine, Randy 542.98 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202229 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah ‐ Credit (540.90) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202230 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/17/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh 31.84 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202231 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/20/2021 AC#3638 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Burl, Victoria 42.88 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202232 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/20/2021 AC#3638 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Burl, Victoria 41.78 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202234 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#2108 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Servin, Amber 380.83 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202234 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ PUB WKS DIV ‐ MENDEZ, SALVADOR ‐ CREDIT (370.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202236 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/22/2021 AC#0933 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Talamantes, Amy 536.93 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202236 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1965 ‐ PLANNING DIV. ‐ MIKAELIAN, JASON‐ CREDIT (530.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202237 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/23/2021 AC#3588 ‐ CMO ‐ Aguilar, Leticia 37.87 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202240 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/23/2021 AC#9478 ‐ CMO ‐ Martinez, Alma 17.46 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202242 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#3588 ‐ CMO ‐ Aguilar, Leticia 53.25 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202243 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh 166.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202244 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#2213 ‐ Finance ‐ Toledo, Marilyn 760.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202244 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1965 ‐ PLANNING DIV. ‐ MIKAELIAN, JASON‐ CREDIT (750.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202245 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/27/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh 16.95 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202246 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/28/2021 AC#9027 ‐ IT ‐ Tran, Anh 11.98 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202247 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/28/2021 AC#3215 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Moreno, Jerry M 195.00 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202247 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/21/2021 AC#1965 ‐ PLANNING DIV. ‐ MIKAELIAN, JASON‐ CREDIT (172.55) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202248 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/29/2021 AC#0933 ‐ Comm Svcs Div ‐ Talamantes, Amy 562.95 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202248 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ Pub Wks Div ‐ Mendez, Salvador ‐ Credit (550.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202249 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/30/2021 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah 210.00

Page 3 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202249 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 12/24/2021 AC#0946 ‐ PUB WKS DIV ‐ MENDEZ, SALVADOR ‐ CREDIT (183.00) R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202250 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 1/3/2022 AC#2039 ‐ HR ‐ Nguyen, John 1.50 R BANK OF AMERICA 12063 0126202251 1/24/2022 Dec 2021 to Jan 3, 2 1/3/2022 AC#1191 ‐ Transportation Div ‐ Zadok, Sarah 120.00 3,049.86 R BATEMAN COMMUNITY LIVING LLC 12350 1104034 2/3/2022 INV2230004301 1/4/2022 DEC 2021 AAA EXEMPT FOR ELDERLY NUTRITION PRG ‐ SR CT 13,257.12 13,257.12 R BDG LAW GROUP, A PROF LAW CORP 13704 1103749 1/27/2022 29989 11/29/2021 OCT 2021 LEGAL SVCS ‐ CMO 428.56 R BDG LAW GROUP, A PROF LAW CORP 13704 1103749 1/27/2022 29466 8/26/2021 JULY 2021 LEGAL SVCS ‐ CMO 280.00 R BDG LAW GROUP, A PROF LAW CORP 13704 1103749 1/27/2022 29604 9/24/2021 AUG 2021 LEGAL SVCS ‐ CMO 242.50 951.06 R BEACON MEDIA INC. 08350 1103750 1/27/2022 A82392 1/13/2022 NOTICE: RUN DATE 01/13/22 REF: HEU 2021‐2029, DOMUS A 308.00 308.00 R BILLINGSLEY 03225 1103815 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R BIOMETRICS4ALL INC 01485 1104036 2/3/2022 ELMON0059 1/1/2022 DEC 2021 RELAY FEES HR/RM 0.75 0.75 R BONNEAU 01496 1104037 2/3/2022 02.27‐03.02.22 2/1/2022 REIMB MILEAGE, MEALS, LODGING & PARKING: SAN DIEGO,C 1,236.24 1,236.24 R BROWN 07047 1103816 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 393.49 393.49 R BUEHLER 10166 1103817 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R BULLINGTON 03317 1103818 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,609.85 1,609.85 R BUNNELL 03322 1103819 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 873.31 873.31 R BURKHART 03233 1103820 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,544.66 1,544.66 R BURLINGHAM 08881 1103821 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,749.28 1,749.28 R BUSTILLOS 03200 1103822 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R CA‐NV SECTION AWWA 01528 1104042 2/3/2022 00432975 1/20/2022 REGISTRATION FOR H2O KNOW FOR 11 UTILITY EMPLOYEES‐ 2,519.00 2,519.00 R CALCON SYSTEMS INC 13791 1104038 2/3/2022 50480 12/30/2021 WELL 16 PLC REPLACEMENT ‐ PW UTIL. 1,716.00 1,716.00 R CALIF. BUILDING STANDARDS 04945 1103751 1/27/2022 OCT‐ DEC 2021 1/24/2022 GREEN BLDG STANDARDS PRG FEES OCT‐DEC 2021 315.90 315.90 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1103752 1/27/2022 492038‐01/22 1/11/2022 AC#1015‐210021492038 (12/11/21‐ 01/07/22) 4535 BALDWI 28.70 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510355‐12/21 12/20/2021 AC#1015‐220036510355 (11/18/21 ‐ 12/16/21) M‐MOTEL 2,844.53 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510348‐12/21 12/20/2021 AC#1015‐220036510348 (11/18/21 ‐ 12/16/21) M‐MOTEL 2,301.75 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510355‐01/22 1/18/2022 AC#1015‐220036510355 (12/17/21 ‐ 01/13/22) M‐MOTEL 376.59 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510348‐01/22 1/18/2022 AC#1015‐220036510348 (12/17/21 ‐ 01/13/22) M‐MOTEL 83.94 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510362‐12/21 12/20/2021 AC#1015‐220036510362 (11/18/21 ‐ 12/16/21) BUDGET INN 83.94 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 510362‐01/22 1/18/2022 AC#1015‐220036510362 (12/17/21 ‐ 01/13/22) BUDGET INN 83.94 R CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER 01565 1104039 2/3/2022 941916‐01/22 1/18/2022 AC#1015‐210018941916 (12/17/21 ‐ 01/13/22) 9513 VALLEY 27.50 5,830.89 R CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 11682 1103753 1/27/2022 2021 SALES TAX 1/22/2022 SR 17‐113214 (2021 SALES TAX) 6,135.18 6,135.18 R CALNENA INC 01562 1104040 2/3/2022 02.27‐03.02.22 1/24/2022 REGISTRATION FOR 2022 CALNENA CONFERENCE FOR RUTH B 1,450.00 1,450.00 R CANINE TACTICAL OPERATIONS 06443 1104041 2/3/2022 01.18‐20.22 1/27/2022 S.K.I.D.D.S./CAT CLASS 250 FOR RAUDEL CEBALLOS, ADAM GI 1,875.00 1,875.00 R CANO, RICHARD 08882 1103823 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R CANO, RODRIGO 03249 1103824 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R CARLSON 05121 1103825 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,097.65 1,097.65 R CARTER 01654 1103826 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,283.16 1,283.16 R CASC ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, 09107 1104043 2/3/2022 45479 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 TECHNICAL CONSULTING SVCS ‐ PW UTIL. 12,530.00 R CASC ENGINEERING & CONSULTING, 09107 1104043 2/3/2022 45246 11/30/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ TECHNICAL CONSULTING SVCS ‐ PW UTIL. 9,832.50 22,362.50 R CASSETTA 11053 1103827 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R CASTRUITA 03202 1103828 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R CAZARES 11414 1103754 1/27/2022 147 2/1/2022 FEB 2022 EVENT COORDINATOR ‐ DEMBA 3,000.00 3,000.00 R CEBALLOS 12954 1103829 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 517.02 517.02 R CHAN 11670 1103830 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R CHAVEZ 11931 1103831 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78

Page 4 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R CHEMSCAN, INC. 13541 1104045 2/3/2022 12329 12/2/2021 STRAINER BOWL ASSEMBLY FOR PW UTIL. 244.21 R CHEMSCAN, INC. 13541 1104045 2/3/2022 12287 11/24/2021 CHEMSCAN STRAINER BOWL FOR PW UTIL. 168.80 413.01 R CITY OF EL MONTE ‐ WORKERS 01238 0201202201 1/31/2022 JAN 2022 1/31/2022 JAN 2022 BOOK TRANSFER TO PREFUND THE WORKERS' COM 36,624.12 36,624.12 R CLAYTON 03227 1103832 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 801.22 801.22 R COBIAN, MANUELA 03267 1103833 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R COBIAN, ROGER 10197 1104046 2/3/2022 02.14‐17.22 1/31/2022 REIMB FOR SUBSISTENCE & PARKING: DANA POINT, CA 552.00 552.00 R COLEMAN 03234 1103834 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R COLLARI, FAITH 03320 1103835 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 262.53 262.53 R COLLARI, JOHN 03235 1103836 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 483.38 483.38 R CRAMER 13689 1103837 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 859.55 859.55 R CWEA (CALIF WATER ENVIRONMENT 09041 1104047 2/3/2022 ID:335692 12/6/2021 CERTIFICATION MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 2022 FOR DAVID GA 91.00 91.00 R DAHL 03248 1103838 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R DARROW 01813 1103839 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 391.63 391.63 R DAVE'S TROPHIES 01819 1104048 2/3/2022 51863 1/25/2022 NAME BADGES W/ EM PIN ‐ CMO 42.90 42.90 R DE LA FUENTE 04392 1103840 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R DE LOS REYES 14083 1104049 2/3/2022 192675 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 3,000.00 3,000.00 R DEMERJIAN 09296 1103841 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL CARE AND 01763 1103755 1/27/2022 DEC 2021 1/25/2022 KENNEL SERVICES FOR DEC 2021 ‐ ANIMAL CONTROL 15,282.51 15,282.51 R DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 01841 1104050 2/3/2022 554823 1/6/2022 DEC 2021 FINGERPRINT APPS ‐ PD 32.00 R DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 01841 1104051 2/3/2022 549269 12/3/2021 NOV 2021 FINGERPRINT APPS ‐ HR 160.00 R DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 01841 1104051 2/3/2022 554852 1/6/2022 DEC 2021 FINGERPRINT APPS ‐ HR 128.00 320.00 R DIEGO 14076 1104053 2/3/2022 192255 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 1,290.00 1,290.00 R DIVISION OF THE STATE 08319 1103756 1/27/2022 SB 1186 OCT‐DEC 2021 1/26/2022 OCT‐DEC 2021 SB 1186 DISABILITY ACCESS & EDUCATION FEE 873.20 873.20 R DNA OVERHEAD DOORS 13119 1104054 2/3/2022 Jan1922 1/19/2022 M‐MOTEL PROGRAM KEYCARDS, INSTALL LOCK SETS, FABRICA 10,900.00 10,900.00 R DOCTOR AUTO GLASS 01868 1104055 2/3/2022 94894 1/25/2022 WINDSHIELD FOR PD VEH. 189.23 189.23 R DOMINGUEZ, TYLER 12257 1103757 1/27/2022 01.24‐28.22 1/20/2022 REIMB. FOR PER DIEM, MILEAGE, & LODGING ‐ CHEM AGENT 1,251.41 1,251.41 R DOMINGUEZ, ERIC 06471 1103842 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R DOYLE 03195 1103843 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 72.10 72.10 R DSL BUILDERS 14078 1104056 2/3/2022 192299 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 2,340.00 2,340.00 R DURAN 06362 1103844 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R ECKLER 03221 1103845 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 621.16 621.16 R ELITE COLLISION CENTER 12824 1104057 2/3/2022 99345530 12/15/2021 REPAIR BODY DAMAGE 2019 FORD F‐150 (PW‐172) 2,521.76 2,521.76 R ELKIN JR 03321 1103846 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,126.03 1,126.03 R ELLIS 03304 1103847 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R ESCALANTE 12579 1103848 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 274.87 274.87 R ESPINOSA 04386 1103849 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 591.15 591.15 R EUGENIO 09966 1103850 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 493.73 493.73 R EVARI GIS CONSULTING, INC. 14012 1103758 1/27/2022 1233 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 ‐ GIS SIDEWALK INVENTORY AND REPAIR PROG ‐EN 600.00 600.00 R EVERETT 03223 1103851 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R EXPERIAN 02005 1104058 2/3/2022 CD2209003397 12/31/2021 CREDIT PROFILES FOR PD 77.00 77.00 R EXPRESS AIR TESTING INC. 13936 1103759 1/27/2022 9253 1/8/2022 INITIAL ASBESTOS SURVEY‐ COMM, ASBESTOS SAMPLES ‐ PW 855.00 855.00 R FEDEX 02026 1104059 2/3/2022 7‐585‐63564 12/3/2021 COURIER SVCS FOR HR 32.07 32.07 R FENTRESS 03245 1103852 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R FETNER 05123 1103853 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,543.28 1,543.28

Page 5 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R FISCHER 02048 1103854 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R FISHER 03306 1103855 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 796.26 796.26 R FISK 03247 1103856 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R FLORES 05255 1103857 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R FONSECA 06361 1103858 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R FOURR 12000 1103859 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R FRASER 11932 1103860 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R FRY 10726 1103861 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R FULLINGTON 03250 1103862 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 796.26 796.26 R GALINDO 10577 1103863 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 400.94 400.94 R GALLARDO 03207 1103864 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R GARCIA 14071 1103865 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R GARLICK 13639 1103866 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R GARNER 03279 1103867 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 202.40 202.40 R GEE 03287 1103868 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 796.26 796.26 R GEORGE, LESLIE E 03212 1103869 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R GEORGE, RICKIE D 10974 1103870 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,203.96 1,203.96 R GERONIMO 02137 1103871 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R GIBBONEY 03280 1103872 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 932.26 932.26 R GIRGLE 13503 1103873 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R GLASS 05578 1103874 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 873.31 873.31 R GLICK 14072 1103875 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 2,526.08 2,526.08 R GLUSKOTER 08277 1103876 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 512.23 512.23 R GMS ELEVATOR SERVICES INC 02090 1104062 2/3/2022 108724 1/1/2022 SERVICE BILLING HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR CHW ‐ PW 141.50 R GMS ELEVATOR SERVICES INC 02090 1104062 2/3/2022 108723 1/1/2022 SERVICE ELEVATOR AQUATIC CENTER 130.00 271.50 R GOLDSTREET DESIGN AGENCY INC 13179 1104063 2/3/2022 2580 1/20/2022 CITY LOGO CAR STICKERS FOR PW UTIL. 318.91 318.91 R GONDEK 08689 1103877 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R GONZALES 08691 1103878 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 447.58 447.58 R GOODWIN 10578 1103879 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R GREER 03231 1103880 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 96.71 96.71 R GROSSO 02199 1103881 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R GUZMAN, ALEX 03310 1103882 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R GUZMAN, DAVID 04478 1103883 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R HAGER, IRENE 03229 1103884 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 106.58 106.58 R HAGER, STEPHEN 03316 1103885 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R HAIDET 03300 1103886 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,781.38 1,781.38 R HANSON AGGREGATES LLC 02233 1104064 2/3/2022 2324727 1/18/2022 WASHED PLASTER SAND FOR PW WATER DEPT. 734.28 734.28 R HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 02238 1103760 1/27/2022 51182 1/14/2022 11/28/21 ‐ 12/31/21 ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION 2021‐22 ‐ EN 337.50 337.50 R HAWKINSON 03268 1103887 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R HAYES 03242 1103888 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R HELLEIN 07060 1103889 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R HERNANDEZ, JESSE 04541 1103890 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R HERNANDEZ, SANTOS 09967 1103891 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R HERNANDEZ, VICTOR 02263 1103892 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56

Page 6 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R HIGA 08331 1103893 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R HOME DEPOT 13854 1104068 2/3/2022 6511197 12/22/2021 PADLOCKS FOR PW UTIL. 166.50 R HOME DEPOT 13854 1104068 2/3/2022 7094686 1/20/2022 MAX D 8 PACK, AA 36 PACK, FUEL STABILIZER, GAS CAN ‐ PW 111.67 278.17 R HOPKINS 02290 1103894 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,263.04 1,263.04 R HUANG 14080 1104069 2/3/2022 195701 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 1,000.00 1,000.00 R HUBBELL 03167 1103895 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R HUERTAS 04475 1103896 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R HUNT 03259 1103897 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R HUTSELL 07048 1103898 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R INFOSEND, INC. 12193 1103762 1/27/2022 204512 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 STATEMENT DATA PROCESSING ‐ TR 2,235.55 R INFOSEND, INC. 12193 1103762 1/27/2022 205612 1/17/2022 DEC 2021 MONTHLY EBPP MAINT., ENROLLED CUSTOMER FE 703.12 2,938.67 R INTERSTATE BATTERIES OF 02369 1104070 2/3/2022 20151924 1/7/2022 BATTERY FOR PD VEH. UNIT 267 DUI TRAILER 131.85 131.85 R ISHIGAKI 03284 1103899 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 42.30 42.30R JARAMILLO 11057 1103900 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R JENKINS, JACK 11054 1103901 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 145.65 145.65 R JENKINS, THOMAS 05787 1103902 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R JESKE 03289 1103903 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R JIMENEZ 02399 1103904 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R JOHANSON 03254 1103905 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,546.42 1,546.42 R JOHN L HUNTER & ASSOC INC 02308 1104071 2/3/2022 EM1FOG12110 12/31/2021 FOG PROGRAM PERMITTING ‐ PW UTIL. 77.50 77.50 R JOHNSON 04839 1103906 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 145.65 145.65 R JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. 02408 1103763 1/27/2022 1‐107947326254 10/22/2021 REPAIRS TP VAV BOXES IN CHE ‐ PW 2,121.00 R JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. 02408 1103763 1/27/2022 1‐107785613767 10/13/2021 REPAIRS TO AC UNIT IN CHE‐ PW 1,117.00 3,238.00 R JOHNSTON 03238 1103907 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R KEENAN & ASSOCIATES 11801 1104072 2/3/2022 268667 1/20/2022 JAN 2022 ONLINE BENEFITS ADMIN. ‐ HR 1,250.00 1,250.00 R KELLEY 03261 1103908 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R KENNY 03206 1103909 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R KHA 14069 1104073 2/3/2022 01.24.22 1/24/2022 REFUND FOR REGISTRATION FOR TINY TOTS ‐ LOGAN KHA 150.00 150.00 R KLEMS 03285 1103910 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R KRIGBAUM 03294 1103911 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R KULM 04838 1103912 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R LA VERNE POWER EQUIPMENT, INC. 12578 1104074 2/3/2022 338667 1/19/2022 WALBRO OEM PRIMER BULBS FOR PW UTIL. 2.88 2.88 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1103764 1/27/2022 21‐965 1/6/2022 DEC 2021 ‐ SENIOR PROJ MGR ‐ CLORA PLACE PROJ ‐ ENG. DIV 3,375.00 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1103764 1/27/2022 21‐970 1/6/2022 DEC 2021 ‐ SENIOR PROJ MGR ‐ SCHMIDT ROAD PROJ ‐ ENG. D 1,575.00R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1104075 2/3/2022 21‐830 11/16/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ CLORA PLACE ‐ ENGINEERING DIV. 6,150.00 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1104075 2/3/2022 21‐835 11/16/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ SCHMIDT ROAD ‐ ENG DIV. 3,225.00 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1104075 2/3/2022 21‐925 12/14/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ CLORA PLACE ‐ ENGINEERING DIV. 1,650.00 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1104075 2/3/2022 21‐975 1/6/2022 DEC 2021 ‐ BALDWIN AVE AND EL MONTE AVE STREET REHAB 1,425.00 R LAE ASSOCIATES, INC. 11943 1104075 2/3/2022 21‐930 12/14/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ SCHMIDT ROAD ‐ ENGINEERING DIV. 6,225.00 23,625.00 R LAM HUU NGO 14081 1104076 2/3/2022 192233 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 3,000.00 3,000.00 R LANGAN 03232 1103913 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R LARSEN 02488 1103914 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R LAST 05991 1103915 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R LAZZARINI 03290 1103916 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53

Page 7 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 02503 1104077 2/3/2022 641130 2/28/2022 2022 MEMBERSHIP DUES ‐ CMO 29,182.00 29,182.00 R LEBLANC 04387 1103917 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 66.58 66.58 R LEGERE 03318 1103918 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R LEONARD 03303 1103919 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R LEONARD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 12759 1104078 2/3/2022 2022LS007 1/31/2022 JAN 2022 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SVCS ‐ ENGINEERING D 14,616.69 14,616.69 R LI 14082 1104079 2/3/2022 195724 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 1,000.00 1,000.00 R LIGHT BULB CITY / LBC LIGHTING 07343 1104080 2/3/2022 348390 1/11/2022 54 WATT LED HID REPLACEMNT FOR PW 528.76 R LIGHT BULB CITY / LBC LIGHTING 07343 1104080 2/3/2022 346494 11/2/2021 ELITE OWP NC 301 105W LED LARGE NO CUT OFF WALL PACK 264.49 R LIGHT BULB CITY / LBC LIGHTING 07343 1104080 2/3/2022 347500 12/2/2021 8MR 16/LED/40'/50K/90CRI/12V, 10A19/LED/930/120V/ND/4 85.57 878.82 R LINN 08259 1103920 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 651.79 651.79 R LONGO TOYOTA 02549 1104081 2/3/2022 12‐15‐21 EMPD1 12/15/2021 2020 TOYOTA COROLLA CERTIFIED ‐ PD VIN#J049360 27,900.00 R LONGO TOYOTA 02549 1104081 2/3/2022 12‐15‐21 EMPD2 12/15/2021 2018 TOYOTA RAV4 CERTIFIED VIN#D124163 ‐ PD 27,096.00 54,996.00 R LOPEZ, CARLOS 04760 1103921 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R LOPEZ, FRANK 11933 1103922 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S 02580 1104082 2/3/2022 221665SG 1/12/2022 DEC 2021 INMATE MEAL SERVICE ‐ PD 636.48 636.48R LOS ANGELES TIMES 06200 1104083 2/3/2022 01.20.22 1/20/2022 ACCT#10006963260 SUBSCRIPTION THROUGH 04/21/22 ‐ CM 106.86 106.86 R LOWRY 03315 1104084 2/3/2022 JUL 2021‐ JAN 2022 1/31/2022 JULY 2021 ‐ JAN 2022 MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT 1,185.20 1,185.20 R LUJAN 06507 1103923 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 513.96 513.96 R LUONGO 10198 1103765 1/27/2022 01.24.2022 1/24/2022 REIMB. CODE ENF. OFFICER FOR PURCHASE OF WORK PANTS 68.27 68.27 R MACHLIS 05256 1103924 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 145.65 145.65 R MACKINTOSH 03226 1103925 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 302.03 302.03 R MAGANA 03266 1103926 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R MALONE 04390 1103927 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 11097 1104085 2/3/2022 prm‐068570 1/1/2022 JAN 2022 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ‐ HR 682.64 682.64 R MARIN 09312 1103928 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R MARRUJO 04389 1103929 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R MARTINEZ, ALMA K. 11844 1103766 1/27/2022 01.25.22 1/25/2022 PER DIEM FOR 2022 CITY MGR'S CONF., MONTEREY, CA FEB 2 180.00 180.00 R MARTINEZ, ALMA K. ‐ PETTY CASH 12871 1103767 1/27/2022 10.18‐01.11.22 1/12/2022 REIMBURSE PETTY CASH 10/18/21 ‐ 01/11/22 ‐ CMO & CITY C 665.69 665.69R MASTERSON 03168 1103930 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 97.28 97.28R MATTHEW BENDER & CO INC 01464 1104086 2/3/2022 28891066 12/7/2021 CA PARKERS EVIDENCE 2022 ED FOR CITY ATTNY OFFICE 124.77 R MATTHEW BENDER & CO INC 01464 1104086 2/3/2022 2869824X 11/29/2021 CA PARKERS EVIDENCE 2021 AVE LEG FOR CITY ATTNY OFFICE 28.23 153.00 R MATTHEWS 03277 1103931 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,043.41 1,043.41 R MC MILLEN 02671 1104087 2/3/2022 OCT 21 ‐ DEC 21 1/31/2022 MEDICAL SUBSIDY FOR OCT ‐DEC 2021 1,272.00 1,272.00 R MEDINA 03282 1103932 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R MENART 10334 1103933 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R MENDEZ 12001 1103934 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R MENDOZA 08001 1103935 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R METOYER 11697 1103936 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 12956 1104088 2/3/2022 JAN 2022 12/15/2021 ACCT #KM05965542 JAN 2022 DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 27,182.94 R METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE 12956 1104088 2/3/2022 DEC 2021 11/15/2021 ACCT #KM05965542 DEC 2021 DENTAL INSURANCE PREMIUM 27,122.25 54,305.19R MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC 10220 1103768 1/27/2022 1134751 12/13/2021 PROF CONSULTING SVCS THRU 11/28/21 STREET SEWER WAT 2,852.00 R MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC 10220 1103768 1/27/2022 1137105 1/13/2022 PROF CONSULTING SVCS THRU 12/31/21 CONSTRUCTION MG 2,244.00 5,096.00R MILLER 03314 1103937 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R MIRELES 03255 1103939 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,812.61 1,812.61

Page 8 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R MIRELES JR. 03191 1103938 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R MITCHELL 03274 1103940 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R MONTIERTH 13861 1103941 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076517 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE GM/LSI ‐PW U 791.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076503 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE GM/LSI ‐PW U 565.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076490 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 12 ‐PW U 502.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076560 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 437.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076562 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 437.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076573 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 437.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076537 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE GENERAL PHYS 42.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076484 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE GENERAL PHYS 98.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076493 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 13 ‐PW U 86.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076495 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 10 ‐PW U 86.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076509 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE GENERAL PHYS 70.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076540 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 45.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076570 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐PW U 45.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076564 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076566 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 2A ‐PW 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076483 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE COLIFORM ‐PW 105.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076561 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE COLIFORM ‐PW 105.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076567 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE COLIFORM ‐PW 105.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076574 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE COLIFORM ‐PW 105.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076531 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE COLIFORM ‐PW 120.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐052092 8/31/2021 08/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 106.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076461 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076468 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 2A ‐PW 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076479 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076558 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 106.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076523 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE TTHMS ‐PW U 266.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076462 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 12 ‐PW U 159.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076480 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 12 ‐PW U 159.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076556 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 12 ‐PW U 159.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076563 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 12 ‐PW U 159.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076542 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐PW UT 135.00R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076539 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 392.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076486 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 3 ‐PW U 381.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076498 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 2A ‐PW 381.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076534 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE WELL 14,15,16 348.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076473 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU ‐ DEEP 339.00 R MONTROSE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 13598 1103770 1/27/2022 CINV‐076538 12/31/2021 12/31/21 WATER QUALITY SAMPLE EL MONTE EMOU GM/LSI 339.00 8,140.00 R MORALES 03281 1103942 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R MORAZA 02742 1103943 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R MOSELEY 04955 1103944 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,140.46 1,140.46 R MOY 07049 1103945 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53

Page 9 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R MUSE 09373 1103946 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R MUSSENDEN 05550 1103947 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,351.81 1,351.81 R NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 02801 1104089 2/3/2022 6400492 12/30/2021 DELUXE UNIT RENTAL FOR PW UTIL. 258.00 258.00 R NATIONWIDE COST RECOVERY 10698 1103771 1/27/2022 M119‐A 12/9/2021 NOV 2021 FORCLOSURE REGISTRATION FEES ‐ ECON DEV DIV 724.50 R NATIONWIDE COST RECOVERY 10698 1103771 1/27/2022 M118‐A 11/4/2021 OCT 2021 FORCLOSURE REGISTRATION FEES ‐ ECON DEV DIV 724.50R NATIONWIDE COST RECOVERY 10698 1103771 1/27/2022 M114‐A 7/1/2021 JUNE 2021 FORCLOSURE REGISTRATION FEES ‐ ECON DEV DIV 434.70R NATIONWIDE COST RECOVERY 10698 1103771 1/27/2022 M117‐A 10/5/2021 SEPT 2021 FORCLOSURE REGISTRATION FEES ‐ ECON DEV DIV 144.90 2,028.60R NAVISITE, LLC 13568 1104090 2/3/2022 373388 1/31/2022 02/01/22 ‐ 02/28/22 MANAGED SQL DBA SRVCS ‐ REMOTE DC 2,499.98 2,499.98 R NEUMEYER 05307 1103948 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R NOBEL SYSTEMS, INC. 13174 1104091 2/3/2022 15137 7/7/2021 FIELD FORMS ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION HOSTING OF DATA FRO 9,800.00 R NOBEL SYSTEMS, INC. 13174 1104091 2/3/2022 15315 12/20/2021 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBSCRIPTION SVCS FROM 01.01.2 12,000.00 21,800.00 R NORRIS 07276 1103772 1/27/2022 02.09‐11.22 1/24/2022 REIMB MILEAGE & SUBSISTENCE: SAN DIEGO ‐ PD 594.36 594.36 R NOVA ELECTRIC 12226 1104092 2/3/2022 121 1/19/2022 INSTALLED 12 GFI OUTLETS AND 4 LED STRIP LIGHTS AT 3 WE 1,860.00 R NOVA ELECTRIC 12226 1104092 2/3/2022 119 1/19/2022 INSTALLED AND RAN POWER FOR 2 LED WALL PACK FIXTURES 1,805.00 R NOVA ELECTRIC 12226 1104092 2/3/2022 120 1/19/2022 RELOCATED CONDUITS AND OUTLETS FOR FUTURE SKIDS AT 2 1,050.00 4,715.00R NUNEZ 04516 1103949 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R NV5, INC. 12935 1103773 1/27/2022 247916 12/17/2021 NOV 2021 ENG DESIGN SVCS FOR EL MONTE, BALDWIN AVE‐ 5,630.00 5,630.00 R OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 13984 1104093 2/3/2022 73777152 12/9/2021 EXAMS PERFORMED PER HR 425.00 R OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 13984 1104093 2/3/2022 73079738 10/15/2021 EXAMS PERFORMED PER HR 405.00 R OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 13984 1104093 2/3/2022 73684054 12/3/2021 EXAMS PERFORMED PER HR 165.00 R OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 13984 1104093 2/3/2022 73852405 12/15/2021 EXAMS PERFORMED PER HR 80.00 1,075.00 R OGDEN 03192 1103950 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 440.30 440.30 R OLIVA 07050 1103951 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R OLIVER 03169 1103952 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 145.65 145.65 R ONWARD ENGINEERING 10756 1104094 2/3/2022 6190 1/6/2022 SRVC THRU 12/31/21 SANTA ANITA TRANSP. PROG CIP 890 C 142.00 142.00 R PARS 02987 1103774 1/27/2022 49782 1/10/2022 PARS TRUST ADMIN FEE MO. END 11/30/21 9,473.61 9,473.61 R PAWASARAT 03299 1103953 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 697.83 697.83 R PENNEY 05306 1103954 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,136.46 1,136.46 R PEREA JR 03244 1103955 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R PIPE PROS PLUMBING INC. 12207 1104095 2/3/2022 2565 12/7/2021 PLUMBING FOR PROJ HOMEKEY ‐ CED 36,858.55 36,858.55 R PLUMBERS DEPOT INC 03008 1103775 1/27/2022 PD‐49617 10/26/2021 RING ADJ., SEALANT FOR PW 145.51 145.51 R POLANCO JR 11056 1103956 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R POLICE K‐9 MAGAZINE 14067 1103776 1/27/2022 03.08‐10.22 1/20/2022 REGISTRATION FOR 2022 CANINE TRAINING CONFERENCE ‐ A 590.00 590.00 R POPPERWELL 03278 1103957 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R POTIKOM 03292 1103958 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R PREMIER FLEET MAINTENANCE, INC 14064 1104096 2/3/2022 160 1/12/2022 KN95 MASKS FOR PW 8,690.00 8,690.00 R PREST 07051 1103959 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 79.89 79.89 R PRIETO 03218 1103960 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 557.02 557.02 R PROVIDENTE 06673 1103961 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 476.70 476.70 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 188149 10/7/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 594.96 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 91767 10/20/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 589.99 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 92260 11/16/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 487.89 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 189132 10/6/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 448.30 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 92281 11/16/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 249.40

Page 10 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 91556 9/30/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 36.41 R PUENTE HILLS FORD 03051 1104097 2/3/2022 93869 1/6/2022 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 14.76 2,421.71 R QUALITY AUTO SUPPLY 08931 1104098 2/3/2022 247640‐1 12/15/2021 PW‐1 COMMERCIAL BATTERY FOR PW VEH. 300.34 300.34 R QUIROZ 10432 1103962 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R RAMIREZ 03241 1103963 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R READYREFRESH BY NESTLE 10242 1104099 2/3/2022 12A0027960095 1/20/2022 12.19.21 ‐‐ 01.18.22 WATER SVCS FOR PARKS/REC DIV. 76.54 R READYREFRESH BY NESTLE 10242 1104099 2/3/2022 11L0027960095 12/21/2021 11.19.21 ‐‐ 12.18.21 WATER SVCS FOR PARKS/REC DIV. 56.54 133.08 R RED DOT UNIFORMS 03088 1104100 2/3/2022 79801 1/3/2022 FLEXFIT CAPS FOR PW 3,168.00 3,168.00 R RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 11690 1103777 1/27/2022 233‐1‐257953 11/10/2021 WORK BOOTS FOR ALBERTO CHAVEZ ‐ PW 273.37 R RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 11690 1103777 1/27/2022 233‐1‐257952 11/10/2021 WORK BOOTS FOR GREG RAMIREZ ‐ PW 263.69 R RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 11690 1103777 1/27/2022 995‐1‐55741 11/13/2021 WORK BOOTS FOR RAUL ZAMORA ‐ PW 186.13 723.19 R RELIABLE TRANSLATIONS CORP. 14066 1104101 2/3/2022 21012 1/28/2022 DOC: WATER DISCONNECT POLICY ‐ REGULAR ‐ TRANSLATION 1,571.57 1,571.57 R RENDON, MARIE E 07054 1103964 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R RENDON, MICHAEL 07053 1103965 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R RENEER, WYATT 03103 1103778 1/27/2022 02.09‐11.22 1/24/2022 REIMB MILEAGE & SUBSISTENCE: SAN DIEGO ‐ PD 594.36 594.36 R RENEER, ALBERT 05579 1103966 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R REPLACEMENT BENEFIT FUND 03104 1002025494 1/14/2022 100000016655229 12/17/2021 2022 REPLACEMENT BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION, RBP 59,458.32 59,458.32 R RESERVE ACCOUNT 03107 1103779 1/27/2022 22585343 (01.25.22) 1/20/2022 AC#22585343 REFILL POSTAGE ‐ CITY CLERK 4,000.00 4,000.00 R REYBURN 03230 1103967 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 456.06 456.06 R REYES 03319 1103968 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R RICOH USA INC 08128 1103780 1/27/2022 9029311210 1/5/2022 CONTRACT #300‐3218489‐100 (01/01/22‐ 01/31/22) PERIODI 1,094.50 R RICOH USA INC 08128 1103780 1/27/2022 9029311469 1/5/2022 CONTRACT #300‐3211733‐100 (01/01/22 ‐ 01/31/22) PERIOD 232.24 1,326.74 R RIOS 10311 1103969 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R ROACH 07444 1103970 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R ROBERT SKEELS & CO 03477 1104102 2/3/2022 21‐24542 12/22/2021 ILCO KEYBLANK 130K ‐ PD 30.52 30.52 R RODARTE, DANIEL 11874 1103971 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R RODARTE, OLIVIA 03217 1103972 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R RODRIGUEZ, JACK 13075 1103973 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R RODRIGUEZ, JESUS M. 11185 1103974 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R ROMAN 03305 1103975 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 689.35 689.35 R ROMERO 04476 1103976 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 105.65 105.65 R ROSARIO 13800 1103977 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I007476 6/30/2021 JUNE 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FIAR RETURN RENT ADJUSTMENT 3,892.50 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I007182 3/31/2021 MAR 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FIAR RETURN RENT ADJUSTMENT 3,278.75 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008186 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FAIR RETURN RENT ADJ PETITION F 2,746.25 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008080 11/30/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ 11448 LEE LANE ‐ CED 2,337.50 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008081 11/30/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ 11462 LEE LANE ‐ CED 1,161.25 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I007524 7/31/2021 JULY 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FIAR RETURN RENT ADJUSTMENT 982.50 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008157 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 ‐ 11462 LEE LANE ‐ CED 787.50 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008120 11/30/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FIAR RETURN RENT ADJUSTMENT 736.25 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008078 11/30/2021 NOV 2021 ‐ FY 21‐22 SUCCESSOR AGENCY SVCS ‐ CED 300.00 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I008156 12/31/2021 DEC 2021 ‐ 11448 LEE LANE ‐ CED 160.00 R RSG, INC. (ROSENOW SPEVACEK 03158 1103781 1/27/2022 I007894 10/31/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ EL ROVIA MHP FIAR RETURN RENT ADJUSTMENT 135.00 16,517.50 R RUDNICK 13457 1103978 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78

Page 11 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R RUSH TRUCK CENTER, WHITTIER 02970 1104103 2/3/2022 3025964845 12/16/2021 PW 75 REPLACED BROKEN VENT ASSEMBLY FOR PW 239.74 239.74 R S.B.S.D. 10792 1104104 2/3/2022 02.21‐24.22 1/31/2022 INTERMEDIATE TRAFFIC COLLISION INVESTIGATION ‐ ERICK RA 412.00 412.00 R SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 03364 1104105 2/3/2022 50479603 5/26/2021 8 60IN ROUND TABLES FOR PW FARMERS MARKET 879.82 R SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 03362 1104106 2/3/2022 7117 1/18/2022 ZIPLOC BAGS, CUTLERY, HEALTHY SNACKS FOR ELDERLY NUTR 432.69 R SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 03362 1104106 2/3/2022 5915 1/10/2022 ZIPLOC BAGS AND CUTLERY FOR ELDERLY NUTRITION PROG. ‐ 398.95R SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 03362 1104106 2/3/2022 5091 1/6/2022 LETTER SIZE WHT PPR FOR SENIOR CTR. 250.01 R SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 03362 1104106 2/3/2022 7116 1/18/2022 LABEL TAPE REFILLS FOR SENIOR CTR. 62.66 2,024.13 R SAN DIEGO REGIONAL TRAINING CT 03377 1103782 1/27/2022 02.09‐11.22 1/24/2022 ICI ADVANCED CHILD ABUSE COURSE ‐ WYATT RENEER, GABR 850.00 850.00 R SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER ASSOC 03405 1103783 1/27/2022 2022 DUES 1/1/2022 2022 PRODUCER DUES & ASSESSMENTS ‐ PW UTIL 2,952.21 2,952.21 R SAN LUIS AUTO GLASS 06652 1104109 2/3/2022 1282 12/16/2021 PW174‐ VEH GLASS REPLACEMENT 585.00 585.00 R SANCHEZ 03175 1103979 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R SANTANA 09313 1103980 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R SARDINA 12382 1104110 2/3/2022 02.27‐03.02.22 2/1/2022 REIMB MILEAGE, MEALS & LODGING, PARKING FEES: SAN DIE 975.02 975.02 R SC FUELS 10059 1103785 1/27/2022 0495272 1/15/2022 NEIGHBORHOOD SVCS FUEL (01/01/22 ‐ 01/15/22) 43.53 R SC FUELS 10059 1104111 2/3/2022 0495243 1/15/2022 COMM SVCS FUEL (01/01/22 ‐ 01/15/22) 67.31 110.84 R SCATCHARD 03222 1103981 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R SCHIRMER 10114 1103982 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 497.14 497.14 R SCHUSTER, MARGARET 03264 1103983 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 557.02 557.02 R SCHUSTER, STEVEN E 10149 1103984 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 573.14 573.14 R SEPULVEDA 10975 1103985 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R SHAW HR CONSULTING, INC. 11927 1104112 2/3/2022 002436 1/11/2022 DEC 2021 CONSULTING SERVICES FOR HR 1,137.50 1,137.50 R SHERWOOD 03456 1103986 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R SHIMAZU 13456 1103987 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R SHRED‐IT 12563 1104113 2/3/2022 8000850821 1/25/2022 01/13/22 ON‐SITE SHREDDING SERVICES FOR TREASURY DIV. 57.25 R SHRED‐IT 12563 1104113 2/3/2022 82584308 12/2/2021 12/02/21 ON‐SITE SHREDDING SERVICES FOR TREASURY DIV. 57.25 R SHRED‐IT 12563 1104113 2/3/2022 81801664 10/21/2021 10/21/21 ON‐SITE SHREDDING SERVICES FOR TREASURY DIV. 57.25 171.75 R SIEDENTOPP 10113 1103988 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R SINNIG 03293 1103989 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 557.02 557.02 R SMART & FINAL 03484 1104114 2/3/2022 937455 1/3/2022 WATER, MUFFINS, COOKIES FOR PARK/REC DIV. 25.95 R SMART & FINAL 03487 1104115 2/3/2022 773222 1/18/2022 BAGS AND CONTAINERS FOR SENIOR CTR. 245.23 R SMART & FINAL 03487 1104115 2/3/2022 188200 1/18/2022 BAGS AND CONTAINERS FOR SENIOR CTR. 221.26 492.44 R SNOOK, MARK 03500 1103786 1/27/2022 02.07‐09.22 1/20/2022 REIMB. FOR SUBSISTENCE: SHERMAN BLOCK SUPERVISORY LE 256.00 256.00 R SNOOK, THOMAS 03291 1103990 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 932.26 932.26 R SOSA 07371 1103991 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 483.83 483.83 R SOUTHERN TIRE MART LLC 13924 1104123 2/3/2022 7070005031 1/20/2022 FLAT TIRE REPAIRS FOR PW UTIL DIV VEH. 110.00 110.00 R SPECTRUM 13607 1104124 2/3/2022 1102697012622 1/26/2022 AC#8448 30 018 1102697 (01/26/22 ‐ 02/25/22 ‐ INTERNET S 2,331.27 2,331.27 R SPERRY 03307 1103992 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,888.11 1,888.11 R STACY 03257 1103993 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R STANLEY 12592 1103994 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R STATE OF CALIF DEPT OF 03581 1103789 1/27/2022 OCT‐DEC 2021 1/24/2022 EQD FEES OCT ‐ DEC 2021 1,090.70 1,090.70 R STATES 10139 1103995 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R STEVENS 12166 1103996 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R STRATIS 13211 1103997 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,686.65 1,686.65 R SULLIVAN 03295 1103998 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 859.55 859.55

Page 12 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R SUPER UNIQUE AUTO REPAIR 12311 1104125 2/3/2022 20596 12/23/2021 REPAIRS TO PD VEH. 262.97 262.97 R SWRCB (STATE WATER RESOURCES 03589 1104126 2/3/2022 WD‐0196534 1/5/2022 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE INDEX NO. 470800 FOR 07.01.21‐06.30. 18,120.00 R SWRCB (STATE WATER RESOURCES 03589 1104127 2/3/2022 WD‐0197201 1/5/2022 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE FOR SECTIONS 13260 & 13269 OF CALIF 763.00 18,883.00 R SWRCB‐ ACCOUNTING OFFICE 10027 1103790 1/27/2022 LW‐1034437 12/22/2021 7/1/21 ‐ 6/30/22 WATER SYSTEM FEES ‐ PW 9,771.50R SWRCB‐ ACCOUNTING OFFICE 10027 1103791 1/27/2022 WD‐0192068 12/8/2021 07/01/21 ‐ 06/30/22 WATER SYSTEM FEE FOR PW ANNUAL P 17,834.00 27,605.50 R TAFOYA 13688 1103999 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R TALAMANTEZ 07055 1104000 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R TCHARKHOUTIAN 05845 1104001 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 361.43 361.43 R TED JOHNSON PROPANE 10543 1104128 2/3/2022 277036 1/1/2022 STORAGE TANK LEASE FOR PW DIV. VEH. 20.00 20.00 R THE SAUCE CREATIVE SVCS CORP. 04961 1104129 2/3/2022 5177 11/16/2021 RENEWAL POST OFFICE PERMIT ‐ CMO 265.00 R THE SAUCE CREATIVE SVCS CORP. 04961 1104130 2/3/2022 5116 10/15/2021 CITY OF EL MONTE BROCHURE MAIL OUT, OFFICE COPIES ‐ CM 8,790.34 9,055.34 R THE WORKSHOP 03914 1103792 1/27/2022 69179 1/10/2022 TAXI VEH PERMIT DECALS FY 2022, NUMBERING CHARGE, TO 709.50 R THE WORKSHOP 03914 1104131 2/3/2022 69219 1/19/2022 REVISED BLUE SEAL LETTERHEAD POST SEAL ADDED FBI RMVD 302.50 R THE WORKSHOP 03914 1104131 2/3/2022 69217 1/19/2022 GUADALUPE DELGADO, HEVER DIAZ, DET. CALATAYUD BUSIN 148.50 1,160.50R THOMAS 06701 1104002 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,000.36 R THOMAS 06701 1104132 2/3/2022 FEB 2022 2/1/2022 FEB 2022 SPOUSAL RETIREE MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT 544.30 1,544.66 R THOMPSON 03208 1104003 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R THOMSON REUTERS ‐ WEST PAYMENT 03872 1104133 2/3/2022 0440778347 12/22/2021 SUBSCRIPTION PRODUCT CHARGES ‐ CITY ATTY 768.90 R THOMSON REUTERS ‐ WEST PAYMENT 03872 1104133 2/3/2022 0440767198 12/22/2021 SUBSCRIPTION PRODUCT CHARGES ‐ CITY ATTY 768.90 R THOMSON REUTERS ‐ WEST PAYMENT 03872 1104133 2/3/2022 845608058 1/1/2022 DEC 2021 ONLINE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES ‐ PD 766.07 2,303.87 R TIME WARNER CABLE 13054 1103793 1/27/2022 103883501‐12/21 1/1/2022 INV #103883501010122 DEC 2021 DATA SRVC FOR ICI RADIO 754.56 R TIME WARNER CABLE 03671 1104134 2/3/2022 0016703011622 1/6/2022 ACCT#8448 20 899 0016703 CITYWIDE CABLE TV & INTERNET 2,034.18 R TIME WARNER CABLE 03671 1104134 2/3/2022 0669027121321 12/13/2021 ACCT#8448 30 018 0669027 (12/13/21 ‐ 01/12/22 AQUATIC, 581.57 3,370.31 R TIMKEN II 09283 1104004 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 557.02 557.02 R TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC 09921 1103794 1/27/2022 17574 10/1/2021 OCT 2021 ‐ CONSULTING SERVICES FOR CMO 8,500.00 R TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC 09921 1103794 1/27/2022 17876 1/1/2022 JAN 2022 CONSULTING SVCS FOR CMO 8,500.00 17,000.00 R TRACE3, LLC. 13869 1103795 1/27/2022 89930 1/25/2022 OFFICE 365 E1, OFFICE 365 E3 SVCS DATES 12/01/21 ‐ 12/31/ 6,530.80 6,530.80 R TRANSITTALENT.COM LLC 08381 1104135 2/3/2022 1832111 11/19/2021 JOB POSTING (TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR) ‐ HR 110.00 110.00 R TROMP 08260 1104005 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R TULA 05251 1104006 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 685.43 685.43 R TURNER 03297 1104007 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R U.S. BANK INSTITUTIONAL TRUST 08004 1104136 2/3/2022 AE‐EXS00B 03.01.22 1/25/2022 PUB. AGY RET. SVCS EXCESS BEN PLAN 03/01/2022 5,660.00 5,660.00 R UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 03732 1104137 2/3/2022 1220210231 1/1/2022 ELMO1/ELMO2 NEW TICKET CHARGES FOR PW UTIL DIV 219.55 R UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 03732 1104137 2/3/2022 dsb20206441 1/1/2022 CALIF. STATE FEE FOR REGULATORY COSTS DIG SAFE BRD OPE 122.93 342.48 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747815 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 227.62 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750386 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 227.62 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747831 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 74.50 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750401 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 74.50 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747830 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 40.90 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750400 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 40.90 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747828 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 38.04 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750398 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 38.04 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747829 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 33.34 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750399 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 33.34

Page 13 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1747816 12/28/2021 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 27.41 R UNIFIRST CORP. 13523 1103796 1/27/2022 325 1750387 1/4/2022 UNIFORM AND LAUNDERING SERVICES FOR PWMD 27.41 883.62 R VAIL 06360 1104008 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R VALENTI‐COHEN 03189 1104009 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R VALENZUELA 03778 1104010 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,290.56 1,290.56 R VAUTRIN 13212 1104011 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R VERIZON 06985 1104138 2/3/2022 9897632111 1/18/2022 ACCT#972054175‐00001 12.19‐01.18.22 ‐ PD 2,499.38 2,499.38 R VERZOSA 14070 1104139 2/3/2022 189378 1/24/2022 REFUND FACILITY DAMAGE DEPOSIT 01.22.22 CELEBRATION 600.00 600.00 R VUONG 14079 1104140 2/3/2022 13168 1/26/2022 BOND RELEASE REFUND ‐ ECON DEV DIV. 1,000.00 1,000.00 R WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO. 06406 1104141 2/3/2022 S119568830.005 12/28/2021 INT EK4536 PHOTOCONTROL RELAY FOR PW 318.44 R WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO. 06406 1104141 2/3/2022 S119568830.004 12/9/2021 INT EK4536 PHOTOCONTROL RELAY FOR PW 131.13 449.57 R WATERMAN 03256 1104012 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 614.88 614.88 R WEINTRAUB 05640 1104013 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 796.26 796.26 R WELCH 03258 1104014 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 726.94 726.94 R WELDON, ANGELA 10976 1104015 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 153.53 153.53 R WELDON, KENNETH 05180 1104016 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,838.26 1,838.26 R WENRICK 12233 1104017 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 487.48 487.48 R WHARY II 03312 1104018 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 620.16 620.16 R WILLDAN ENGINEERING 03897 1103797 1/27/2022 00622238 12/21/2021 SRVC THRU 10/29/21 ELM ALTA PLAN REVIEW ‐ ENG. 1,845.00 R WILLDAN ENGINEERING 03897 1103797 1/27/2022 00622229 12/21/2021 SRVC THRU 10/29/21 ZONE 2 STREET IMPROVEMENTS ‐ ENG. 95.00 R WILLDAN ENGINEERING 03897 1104142 2/3/2022 622471 1/20/2022 SRVC THRU 10/29/21 CITY OF EL MONTE PAVEMENT MGMT P 166.00 2,106.00 R WILLIAMS 14013 1104020 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 1,722.43 1,722.43 R WILLIAMS JR. 07056 1104019 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R WILLS 03903 1104021 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R WILMINGTON TRUST FEE 07803 1103798 1/27/2022 20220123‐30674‐A 1/23/2022 1/24/22 ‐ 1/23/23 MTA TUNNEL CUSTODY ACCT 750.00 750.00 R WONG, ALAN K. 13687 1104022 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 530.78 530.78 R WONG, CLARA 03309 1104023 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 614.88 614.88 R YOUNGQUIST 03953 1104024 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM 570.78 570.78 R ZINK 03301 1104025 2/8/2022 SUBSDY FEB 22 2/8/2022 INS PREMIUM & RETIREE CONTRIBUTION 113.53 113.53 R Regular Vendor Total 895,980.78
T DETROIT AUTO PARTS 01847 1104052 2/3/2022 S1‐79386 1/5/2022 PRESSURIZED COOLANT RESERVOIR ‐ PD VEH. 128.10 128.10 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1103761 1/27/2022 9532675 12/29/2021 PADLOCKS FOR THE MUSEUM ‐ PW 62.66 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1103761 1/27/2022 0540388 12/28/2021 LG MOVING BOXES ‐ PW 54.45 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1103761 1/27/2022 9114715 12/29/2021 SILICONE FOR MECH. SHOP ‐ PW 19.43 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104066 2/3/2022 2030861 1/5/2022 SUPPLIES FOR PW 716.82 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104066 2/3/2022 124039 12/28/2021 SUPPLIES FOR PW 341.72 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104066 2/3/2022 3300636 1/4/2022 SUPPLIES FOR PW 303.62 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104066 2/3/2022 1532381 12/27/2021 SUPPLIES FOR PW 176.79 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104066 2/3/2022 9124061 12/29/2021 SUPPLIES FOR PW 166.23 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104067 2/3/2022 21663 12/8/2021 PLYWOOD FOR PW 218.53 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104067 2/3/2022 2044713 12/6/2021 SUPPLIES FOR PW 135.34 T HOME DEPOT 06479 1104067 2/3/2022 5020811 12/23/2021 FLAT WASHERS, DW MAX IMPACT SET, CONST SCREWS, TAPE 118.26 2,313.85 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 122500‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐021‐1225‐0‐0 (12/03‐01/04/22) 26.44

Page 14 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 201000‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2010‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 26.43 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 442900‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐4429‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 435.93 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 412700‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐4127‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 422.14 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 440300‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐4403‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 415.68 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 200410‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2004‐1‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 361.39 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 702651‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐017‐7026‐5‐1 (12/02‐01/03/22) 327.45 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 974900‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐019‐9749‐0‐0 (12/06‐01/05/22) 291.65 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 105200‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐1052‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 102.54 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 274800‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2748‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 74.19 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 202501‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2025‐0‐1 (12/01‐12/30/21) 74.19 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 264500‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2645‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 70.14 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 436520‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐034‐4365‐2‐0 (12/07‐01/06/22) 66.12 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 571000‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐034‐5710‐0‐0 (12/07‐01/06/22) 66.12 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 020000‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐020‐0200‐0‐0 (12/03‐01/04/22) 140.36 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 518000‐01/22 1/13/2022 AC#1‐1‐023‐5180‐0‐0 (12/13‐01/12/22) 132.30 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 282000‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐032‐2820‐0‐0 (12/04‐01/05/22) 132.22 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 008700‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐020‐0087‐0‐0 (12/03‐01/04/22) 132.21 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 140401‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐1404‐0‐1 (12/01‐12/30/21) 132.17 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 365501‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐3655‐0‐1 (12/01‐12/30/21) 132.17 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 526401‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐015‐5264‐0‐1 (12/02‐01/03/22) 272.59 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 440500‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐4405‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 265.83 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 412900‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐013‐4129‐0‐0 (12/01‐12/30/21) 253.68 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 140603‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐1406‐0‐3 (12/01‐12/30/21) 211.53 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 254001‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐032‐2540‐0‐1 (12/06‐01/05/22) 180.58 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1103784 1/27/2022 241101‐01/22 1/6/2022 AC#1‐1‐011‐2411‐0‐1 (12/01‐12/30/21) 176.72 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 950701‐01/22 1/5/2022 AC#1‐1‐009‐9507‐0‐1 (11/30‐12/29/21) 66.09 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 926501‐01/22 1/5/2022 AC#1‐1‐009‐9265‐0‐1 (11/30‐12/29/21) 66.09 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 508000‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐5080‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 66.09 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 591701‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐5917‐0‐1 (11/29‐12/28/21) 66.09 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 951951‐01/22 1/5/2022 AC#1‐1‐009‐9519‐5‐1 (11/30‐12/29/21) 39.65 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 487000‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐003‐4870‐0‐0 (11/24‐12/27/21) 26.43 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 841900‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐008‐8419‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 144.32 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 225610‐01/22 1/7/2022 AC#1‐1‐032‐2256‐1‐0 (12/06‐01/05/22) 132.22 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 811100‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐008‐8111‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 132.17 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 920651‐01/22 1/5/2022 AC#1‐1‐009‐9206‐5‐1 (11/30‐12/29/21) 132.17 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 595651‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐5956‐5‐1 (11/29‐12/28/21) 132.17 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 579301‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐5793‐0‐1 (11/29‐12/28/21) 74.19 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 622700‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6227‐0‐0 (11/298‐12/28/21) 553.38 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 738500‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐7385‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 379.23 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 621760‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6141‐3‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 265.83 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 136205‐01/22 1/11/2022 AC#1‐1‐031‐1362‐0‐5 (12/09‐01/08/22) 232.27 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 123501‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐001‐1235‐0‐1 (11/24‐12/27/21) 211.53 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 604800‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6048‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 168.62 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 614000‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6140‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 26.43

Page 15 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 614100‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6141‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 26.43 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 614130‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐005‐6141‐3‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 26.43 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 850000‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐008‐8500‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 851.45 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104107 2/3/2022 850200‐01/22 1/4/2022 AC#1‐1‐008‐8502‐0‐0 (11/29‐12/28/21) 810.95 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104108 2/3/2022 031530‐01/22 1/24/2022 AC#1‐1‐911‐0315‐3‐0 (12/21‐01/21/22) 2,040.54 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104108 2/3/2022 016610‐01/22 1/24/2022 AC#1‐1‐911‐0166‐1‐0 (12/21‐01/21/22) 1,212.13 T SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO 03406 1104108 2/3/2022 007650‐01/22 1/24/2022 AC#1‐1‐911‐0076‐5‐0 (12/21‐01/21/22) 132.40 12,938.07 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1103787 1/27/2022 2340421‐0122 1/10/2022 AC#700212340421 (12/10‐01/10/22) 5,757.05 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6467697‐0122 1/12/2022 AC#700036467697 (12/10‐01/11/22) 16.97 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6329473‐0122 1/12/2022 AC#700036329473 (12/10‐01/11/22) 16.78 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6395555‐0122 1/12/2022 AC#700036395555 (12/10‐01/11/22) 16.78 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5094527‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700335094527 (12/10‐01/10/22) 11.85 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 4003894‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700454003894 (12/18‐01/19/22) 6,972.65 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 4013901‐0122 1/21/2022 AC#700454013901 (12/19‐01/20/22) 1,834.32 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 1590286‐0122 1/13/2022 AC#700071590286 (12/13‐01/12/22) 1,252.00 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 1030817‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700631030817 (12/10‐01/10/22) 1,250.70 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 4540933‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700454540933 (12/17‐01/16/22) 928.18 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6072985‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700096072985 (12/18‐01/19/22) 590.97 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5764506‐0122 1/12/2022 AC#700375764506 (12/13‐01/11/22) 57.35 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 9544324‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700169544324 (12/10‐01/10/22) 42.52 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5904393‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700585904393 (12/10‐01/10/22) 36.52 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 8060292‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700348060292 (12/10‐01/10/22) 22.90 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 8147592‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700348147592 (12/10‐01/10/22) 17.87 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6264203‐0122 1/12/2022 AC#700036264203 (12/12‐01/11/22) 17.62 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5748237‐0122 1/21/2022 AC#700375748237 (12/20‐01/20/22) 72.81 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5724086‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700375724086 (12/18‐01/19/22) 69.06 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 9511413‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700269511413 (12/22‐01/23/22) 63.09 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 1952420‐0122 1/14/2022 AC#700351952420 (12/13‐01/14/22) 62.77 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5594047‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700375594047 (12/22‐01/23/22) 60.20 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 8047966‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700348047966 (12/10‐01/10/22) 59.63 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 0948303‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700580948303 (12/18‐01/19/22) 154.58 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5736618‐0122 1/21/2022 AC#700375736618 (12/20‐01/20/22) 125.22 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 6816357‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700086816357 (12/10‐01/10/22) 125.20 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 8073935‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700348073935 (12/10‐01/10/22) 95.41 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 5710750‐0122 1/20/2022 AC#700375710750 (12/18‐01/19/22) 85.21 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104116 2/3/2022 7034419‐0122 1/11/2022 AC#700347034419 (12/10‐01/10/22) 76.75 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5518024‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700015518024 (12/22‐01/23/22) 5,683.22 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5070066‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700345070066 (12/22‐01/23/22) 1,037.88 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 6892937‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700516892937 (12/20‐01/21/22) 19.00 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 9937223‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700379937223 (12/22‐01/23/22) 11.67 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 3489243‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700103489243 (12/20‐01/21/22) 11.66 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5507071‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700345507071 (12/20‐01/21/22) 80.74 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5413408‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700345413408 (12/22‐01/23/22) 70.26 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 0145648‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700550145648 (12/22‐01/23/22) 69.23

Page 16 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5519401‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700345519401 (12/22‐01/23/22) 62.31 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 3695434‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700013695434 (12/20‐01/21/22) 53.27 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5100883‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700345100883 (12/20‐01/21/22) 20.88 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5210920‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700345210920 (12/20‐01/21/22) 332.04 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 8109705‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700348109705 (12/22‐01/23/22) 252.81 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5093409‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700345093409 (12/20‐01/21/22) 194.67 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 0572592‐0122 1/22/2022 AC#700350572592 (12/21‐01/21/22) 121.18 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 9784548‐0122 1/24/2022 AC#700379784548 (12/22‐01/23/22) 96.89 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104117 2/3/2022 5494947‐0122 1/18/2022 AC#700345494947 (12/16‐01/17/22) 82.19 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 4021355‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700344021355 (10/27‐01/26/22) 905.60 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6557907‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700346557907 (11/24‐01/25/22) 140.94 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 8188517‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348188517 (11/23‐01/24/22) 116.68 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 3056081‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700373056081 (10/27‐01/26/22) 73.47 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5455137‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700345455137 (11/24‐01/25/22) 72.73 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6598121‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346598121 (11/23‐01/24/22) 71.99 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6545476‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700346545476 (11/24‐01/25/22) 70.80 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6793838‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700346793838 (10/27‐01/26/22) 63.90 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 4668442‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700184668442 (11/23‐01/24/22) 63.51 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 1924417‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700371924417 (10/27‐01/26/22) 101.23 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6779892‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700346779892 (10/27‐01/26/22) 95.81 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6591451‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346591451 (11/23‐01/24/22) 81.23 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6676529‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346676529 (11/23‐01/24/22) 80.28 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6653893‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346653893 (11/23‐01/24/22) 78.93 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 9260769‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700349260769 (11/23‐01/24/22) 76.41 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5084113‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345084113 (11/23‐01/24/22) 19.22 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5446346‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345446346 (11/23‐01/24/22) 18.92 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5299634‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345299634 (11/23‐01/24/22) 18.58 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5382486‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700345382486 (10/27‐01/26/22) 18.48 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 2027982‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700372027982 (10/27‐01/26/22) 17.28 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6524887‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700036524887 (11/23‐01/24/22) 12.44 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 6569627‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700346569627 (11/24‐01/25/22) 59.02 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5433717‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700345433717 (10/27‐01/26/22) 34.54 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5531828‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700345531828 (11/24‐01/25/22) 33.06 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 5849075‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700375849075 (10/27‐01/26/22) 30.98 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104118 2/3/2022 1013338‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700351013338 (11/23‐01/25/22) 19.25 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 4836223‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700114836223 (11/23‐01/24/22) 19.44 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 2494167‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700402494167 (11/23‐01/24/22) 18.58 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 8440919‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348440919 (11/23‐01/24/22) 36.23 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 5349952‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345349952 (11/23‐01/24/22) 32.79 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7102103‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700367102103 (11/23‐01/24/22) 24.59 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 0367223‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700010367223 (11/23‐01/24/22) 20.12 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 6908610‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700086908610 (11/23‐01/24/22) 19.78 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7067927‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700537067927 (11/23‐01/24/22) 19.45 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 5316812‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345316812 (11/23‐01/24/22) 64.89

Page 17 of 19 ends

2/10/2022 AP DRN Check List 3:01 PM
DRN 659 Ending 02/03/2022
Vendor
Type
Vendor Name Vendor
Code
Check # Check Date Invoice # Invoice
Date
Description Amount Vendor Total
T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 3442566‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700373442566 (11/23‐01/24/22) 61.39 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 9872757‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700379872757 (11/23‐01/24/22) 59.02 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 9895692‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700379895692 (11/23‐01/24/22) 50.98 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7571282‐0122 1/28/2022 AC#700027571282 (10/28‐01/27/22) 50.77 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 9802029‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700379802029 (11/23‐01/24/22) 37.32 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 5201523‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700345201523 (11/23‐01/24/22) 70.57 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 5473123‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700345473123 (10/28‐01/27/22) 69.76 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7251340‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700367251340 (11/23‐01/24/22) 67.56 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 3524210‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700373524210 (11/23‐01/24/22) 66.60 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 4782580‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700374782580 (11/23‐01/24/22) 66.60 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 3736294‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700233736294 (10/28‐01/27/22) 65.87 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7120282‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700097120282 (11/23‐01/24/22) 540.85 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 7793253‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700607793253 (11/23‐01/24/22) 248.31 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 8254090‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348254090 (11/23‐01/24/22) 120.57 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 8712404‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700368712404 (11/23‐01/24/22) 114.54 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 9119888‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700249119888 (11/24‐01/25/22) 78.96 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104119 2/3/2022 1873193‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700361873193 (11/23‐01/24/22) 77.38 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6166616‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700286166616 (11/24‐01/25/22) 3,823.07 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 3980434‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700343980434 (11/24‐01/25/22) 2,976.34 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 2335835‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700542335835 (11/23‐01/24/22) 870.66 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 7902244‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700237902244 (11/24‐01/25/22) 745.08 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6838092‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700346838092 (10/28‐01/27/22) 29.28 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 5837658‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700375837658 (11/23‐01/24/22) 26.42 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8795588‐0122 1/28/2022 AC#700188795588 (10/28‐01/27/22) 25.58 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8126475‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348126475 (11/23‐01/24/22) 18.58 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 0781346‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700350781346 (11/24‐01/25/22) 73.32 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6918928‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700346918928 (10/28‐01/27/22) 72.67 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6639749‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346639749 (11/23‐01/24/22) 70.06 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 9730022‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700469730022 (10/28‐01/27/22) 62.77 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8528724‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348528724 (11/23‐01/24/22) 50.28 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 9556151‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700299556151 (11/24‐01/25/22) 31.11 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8134862‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348134862 (11/23‐01/24/22) 119.48 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 3387811‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700363387811 (11/23‐01/24/22) 118.39 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6662078‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700346662078 (11/23‐01/24/22) 112.06 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 6823342‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700346823342 (10/28‐01/27/22) 76.33 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 3923534‐0122 1/28/2022 AC#700223923534 (10/28‐01/27/22) 75.07 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 3310501‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700243310501 (11/24‐01/25/22) 74.86 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 5334592‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700345334592 (10/28‐01/27/22) 667.13 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 5179897‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700345179897 (10/28‐01/27/22) 488.16 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8207109‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700348207109 (11/23‐01/24/22) 248.42 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 9384142‐0122 1/27/2022 AC#700349384142 (11/24‐01/25/22) 227.14 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 8198607‐0122 1/25/2022 AC#700368198607 (11/23‐01/24/22) 206.64 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 03520 1104120 2/3/2022 5260632‐0122 1/29/2022 AC#700345260632 (10/28‐01/27/22) 122.77 43,982.73 T SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO 03525 1103788 1/27/2022 196719‐01/22 1/12/2022 AC#196 719 3600 3 (12/09‐01/10/22) 113.98

Page 18 of 19 ends

Page 19 of 19 ends

11 12.2

12.3 12.4

FEBRUARY 2022
Sal Mendez,
City of El Monte
Acknowledgments
Public Works & Utilities Director
Lee Torres, City Engineer
Sarah Zadok, Transportation Operations Manager
Steven Wright, Consulting Traffic Engineer
Kevin Ko, Project Manager
Courtney Aguirre,
Southern California Association of Governments
Program Manager II
Joe Punsalan,
KTUA Landscape Architecture and Planning
Principal
Tom Bertulis, Senior Associate, Project Manager
Alex Samarin, Associate
Jorge Nozot,
Marissa Tietz, Planner
Darren Jacobsen, Associate
Planner
Nancy Lee, City of El Monte
Jose Herrera, El Monte City School District
Hector Delgado, El Monte Union High School District
George Schonborn, Mountain View School District
Frank Serna, El Monte City School District
Elizabeth Christy, Eco Urban Gardens
Edward Duong, Active SVG and El Monte Resident
Dina Garcia, Access Services
Danny Arellano, Caltrans and El Monte Resident
Cuong Trinh, Caltrans
Andrew Yip, ActiveSGV
Technical Advisory Committee Members
Josh Edge, Senior Project Manager
Brian Gaze, Director of Business Development
Evari GIS
Octavio Garcia, Planner
Dara Braitman, Director of Planning
Colin Parent, Executive Director
Circulate San Diego
Table of Contents
III
Stakeholder Outreach and Engagement 39

3.1 Stakeholder Outreach and Engagement Overview............ 40

3.2 Stakeholder Outreach and Engagement Goals ................... 40

3.3 Stakeholder Outreach and Engagement Strategies............41

3.4 Project Website.................................................................................42

3.5 Technical Advisory Committee...................................................43

3.6 Outreach Tools...................................................................................44

3.7 Outreach Events................................................................................44

3.8 Online Survey.....................................................................................46 Table of Contents
Executive Summary ES1
ES.1 Purpose........................................................................................... ES2 ES.2 Analysis Methods........................................................................ ES3 ES.3 Community Engagement........................................................ ES4 ES.4 Policy Recommendations........................................................ ES4 ES.5 Project Recommendations ..................................................... ES5 Vision, Goals, and Objectives 49

4.1 Vision Statement..............................................................................50

4.2 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies...............................................50 ES
04 01
05 02
A
06 03
Introduction 1

1.1 Traffic Safety in El Monte.................................................................. 2

1.2 Vision Zero Overview.......................................................................... 2

1.3 Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety Research............................... 3

1.4 The 94% Myth ...................................................................................... 3

1.5 Systemic Safety and the FHWA..................................................... 4

1.6 State/Regional Policy Context....................................................... 4

1.7 The Data-Driven Process .................................................................. 6

1.8 Vision Zero Toolbox - The 6 Es........................................................ 6 Existing Conditions 11

2.1 Overview of El Monte.......................................................................12

2.2 Transportation Context...................................................................15

2.3 Challenges and Opportunities......................................................16

2.4 Collision Summary............................................................................18

2.5 Collision Mapping Overview..........................................................19

2.6 Planning and Policy Context........................................................29

2.7 Vision Zero Benchmarking.............................................................34 Programs
Proposed Best Practices, Policies, and
61 5.1 Best Practice Policies and Programs Overview ....................62

5.2 Policy Recommendations .............................................................62 Implementation 73

6.1 Recommendations and Implementation Overview........... 74

6.2 Prioritized Systemic Infrastructure Recommendations.... 74

6.3 Concept Designs (Cutsheets)......................................................79

6.4 Funding Sources .............................................................................100

6.5 Measuring Implementation Progress with Performance
Measures......................................................................................................115 Appendix A-1
A.1 High-Injury Network Overview..................................................A-2 A.2 Outreach Materials .......................................................................A-17 A.3 Survey Results ............................................................................... A-19 IV
Vision Zero Action Plan
List of Figures
Figure ES-1: Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety Approach ......... ES2 Figure ES-2: Fatal and Severe Injuries in El Monte..................... ES2 Figure ES-3: Normalized Collision Index (CI)................................. ES3 Figure ES-4: Disadvantaged Communities................................... ES4 Street and Denholm Drive
Figure ES-5: Durfee Avenue Project Sheet: Between Magnolia ................................................................... ES5 Figure 1-1: Collision Speed vs. Pedestrian Fatality Rate................. 2 Figure 1-2: Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety Approach................. 3 Figure 2-1: El Monte Population Growth.............................................12 Figure 2-2: Disadvantaged Communities Designation ................13 Figure 2-3: Communities of Concern Designation ........................13 Figure 2-4: Environmental Justice Areas ...........................................14 Figure 2-5: Caltrans Functional Classification.................................17 Figure 2-6: Fatal and Severe Injuries in El Monte ...........................18 Figure 2-7: Bicyclist- and Pedestrian-Involved Collisions ...........18 Figure 2-8: High-Injury Network Method...........................................19 Figure 2-9: Cumulative Fatal and Severe Injury (KSI) Network..21 Figure 2-10: Normalized Fatal and Severe Injury (KSI) Network22 Figure 2-11: Cumulative Collision Index (CI)......................................23 Figure 2-12: Normalized Collision Index (CI).....................................24 Figure 2-13: Auto-Auto Collision Tree .................................................25 Figure 2-14: Auto-Auto Signalized Intersection Collisions..........26 Collisions
Figure 2-15: Bicycle-Involved Non-Signalized Intersection .......................................................................................................27 Collisions
Figure 2-16: Pedestrian-Involved Signalized Intersection .......................................................................................................28 Figure 2-17: Traffic Challenge Areas and Remedies ......................30 Azusa Rd Intersection
Figure 6-1: Sample Modification to La Madera Ave and Lower ..............................................................................76 Idaho St
Figure 6-2: Superstreet example in San Diego at El Cajon Blvd/ ......................................................................................................... 77 at Asher St and Peck Rd in El Monte
Figure 6-3: Example of Median Island Restricting Movements .................................................. 77
Figure 6-4: Recommended Vision Zero Project Locations........79 Street and Denholm Drive
Figure 6-5: Durfee Avenue Project Sheet: Between Magnolia ..................................................................... 80 and Cypress Avenue
Figure 6-6: Bryant Road Project Sheet: Between Tyler Avenue .................................................................................82 Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue
Figure 6-7: Garvey Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Central .........................................................84 Boulevard and North Peck Road
Figure 6-8: Valley Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Ramona .........................................................86 Road and La Madera Avenue
Figure 6-9: Ramona Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Ferris ............................................................... 88 Avenue and Durfee Avenue
Figure 6-10: Magnolia Street Project Sheet: Between Allgeyer .................................................................. 90 and Lower Azusa Road
Figure 6-11: Peck Road Project Sheet: Between Ranchito Street ............................................................................92 Boulevard and Valley Boulevard
Figure 6-12: Tyler Avenue Project Sheet: Between Ramona ...........................................................94 Ranchito Street and McGirk Avenue
Figure 6-13: Santa Anita Avenue Project Sheet: Between
..................................................96
Avenue and Peck Road
Figure 6-14: Lower Azusa Road Project Sheet: Between Elrovia ............................................................................98 Table of Contents
V
List of Tables
Table 2-1: Percent of Commute Modes............................................15 Table 2-2: Average Commute Times (minutes) by Mode ..........15 Table 2-3: Functional Classification of El Monte Roadways.....16 Table 2-4: California Vision Zero Projects 6 Es Takeaways.......35 Table 4-1: Safety and Vision Zero Core Principals........................58 Table 5-1: Goals and Policy Matrix .....................................................70 Table 6-1: Potential Countermeasures to Improve Safety and Concept Costs ........................................................................................... 75 Table 6-2: Durfee Avenue Countermeasure Concept Costs....81 Table 6-4: Bryant Road Countermeasure Concept Costs .......83 Table 6-5: Garvey Boulevard Countermeasure Concept
Costs ..............................................................................................................85 Table 6-6: Valley Boulevard Countermeasure Concept Costs87 Table 6-7: Ramona Boulevard Countermeasure Concept
Costs ..............................................................................................................89 Table 6-8: Magnolia Street Countermeasure Concept Costs .91 Table 6-9: Peck Road Countermeasure Concept Costs...........93 Table 6-10: Tyler Avenue Countermeasure Concept Costs .....95 Table 6-11: Santa Anita Avenue Countermeasure Concept
Costs ..............................................................................................................97 Table 6-12: Lower Azusa Road Countermeasure Concept
Costs ..............................................................................................................99 Table 6-13: Federal Funding Sources ...............................................101 Table 6-14: State Funding Sources..................................................105 Table 6-15: Local / Regional Funding Sources:.............................114 VI
Vision Zero Action Plan

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ES
Executive Summary
Vision Zero Action Plan
ES2
ES.1 Purpose
prioritizes vehicular travel, and creates a challenging and unsafe en and the El Monte Community Center. This transportation environment are clustered on these arterial roads, as are some schools, city parks, local streets that serve residences. Businesses, goods, and services and regional traffic while also directly intersecting with slower-speed arterial roads branch from this network and carry higher-speed local and surrounded by other major interstate and state highways. Large Gabriel Valley. The City is bisected from east to west by Interstate 10 El Monte is a city east of downtown Los Angeles in the central San -
Vision Zero Action Plan is to provide a baseline for transportation safe vironment for non-motorized travelers. The purpose of the El Monte -
entirely new way to approach traffic safety, as shown in deaths and serious injuries on City roadways by 2027. Vision Zero is an the hazard, and present a path forward to achieve zero traffic-related unsafe for all road users, identify characteristics that contribute to ty conditions in El Monte, identify the road segments that are most Figure ES-1.
increasing as well. A record number of severe injury collisions were re in 2020 (even as 2020 data is yet to be complete). Severe injuries are but these years were followed by seven deaths in 2013 and six deaths For example, there were zero traffic-related deaths in 2012 and 2019, low-fatality years have been followed by drastic increases in fatalities. of reduction that the City has organically seen in years past - these death per year is needed to meet the goal of zero traffic deaths - a rate traffic collisions per year. Though an annual reduction of less than one El Monte averages three deaths and 13.5 severe injuries caused by -
corded in 2019, the last full year of collision data, see Figure ES-2. This serious injuries.
for high-severity collisions, to achieve zero traffic-related deaths and that can be implemented citywide, focusing on areas with potential Plan recommends cost-effective transportation safety improvements Figure ES-1: Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety Approach 2019
Traditional Approach Vision Zero Approach

APPROACHES TO TRAFFIC SAFETY

INEVITABLE
Traffic deaths are

PREVENTABLE
Traffic deaths are
human behavior
Assumes PERFECT
behavior
IMPERFECT human
Integrate
collisions
Aims to PREVENT
SEVERE collisions
Prevent FATAL &
responsibility

INDIVIDUAL
approach
Utilizes a SYSTEMS

EXPENSIVE
Saving lives is

EXPENSIVE
Saving lives is NOT
Figure ES-2: Fatal and Severe Injuries in El Monte
Executive Summary ES
ES3
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Normalized CI (percentiles)
Collision Index (CI)
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Corridors of Concern identified by the
75-100th
50-75th
25-50th
1-25th
No collisions
ES.2 Analysis Methods
citywide to identify similar roads and intersections that were not iden characteristics of these “high-injury” road segments were mapped road segments for transportation safety recommendations. Existing Collisions were quantified and mapped block by block to identify -
Figure
tified using the collision-based analysis. The number of lanes, type of ES-3: Normalized Collision Index (CI)
other possible locations for improvements.
medians, and intersection controls were mapped citywide to identify Figure ES-3 is color-coded,
with the red areas showing the road segments with the highest collicollision rates. sion rates, and the blue areas showing the road segments with lower Vision Zero Action Plan
ES4
«¬60
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Garv ey Ave
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
Durfee Av e
Baldwi n Av e
Santa An ita Av e
Ramo na Blv d
Peck Rd
Peck Rd
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
Templ e City Blv d
Ro semead B lv d
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
City Boundary
Communities
Disadvantaged
Figure ES-4: Disadvantaged Communities
Market
at El Monte Farmers
SCAG Go Human display
Monte Farmers Market
Outreach boards at El
neighboring census tracts are also considered disadvantaged. communities, mapped here in yellow by census tract. Many Note: Most of El Monte meets the SB 35 metric for disadvantaged ES.3 Community Engagement
community definition of Senate Bill (SB) 535
several environmental justice indicators, including the disadvantaged El Monte is a diverse community that falls under the definition of 1 , see Figure ES-4. MoreMandarin, and Vietnamese to increase the engagement with the com Department. Outreach materials were provided in English, Spanish, Markets, and meetings with the Fire Department and the Police decals, an educational video, multiple outreach events at Farmers process, including developing a StoryMap, an online survey, Sidewalk project undertook a lengthy and widespread community engagement over, a global pandemic led to additional outreach challenges. The -
recommendations.

Committee convened four times to provide direction and feedback on munity. To supplement community input, a project Technical Advisory ES.4 Policy Recommendations
This Vision Zero plan incorporates the best practice strategies of trafthose six Es, as follows:
following Vision Zero policies are recommended and organized by of related planning documents in the Southern California region, the outreach, consideration of existing conditions in El Monte, and review fic safety, commonly referred to as the “six Es.” Through community

EDUCATION (EDU)
Policy EDU 1: Assess the potential for Safe Routes programs to Schools, Policy EDU 2:
to Transit and for Seniors.

Integrate quick-build strategies to expedite traffic calming and roadway safety improvements.

ENCOURAGEMENT (ENC)
Policy ENC 1: Continue to collaborate with local partners to develop Policy ENC 2:
safe routes to school, parks and transit programs.

Integrate human-centered placemaking amenities in
future roadway designs.

ENFORCEMENT (ENF)
Policy ENF 1: Partner with the El Monte Police Department to develop traffic safety campaigns.

ENGINEERING (ENG)
Policy ENG 1: Introduce traffic calming measures proactively where Policy ENG 2:
high-severity crashes are likely to occur most frequently.

Continue to implement existing Complete Street Policies Policy ENG 3: Prioritize funding for Vision Zero projects and project Policy ENG 4:
features in the Capital Improvement Plan.

Develop a Speed Management Plan to reduce vehicle
speeds on the high-injury network.

Executive Summary ES
ES5

EQUITY (EQU)
Policy EQU 1: Participate in policy reform efforts to support the safety of people walking and bicycling at the state levels.

EVALUATION (EVA)
Policy EVA 1: Develop a program to track, monitor and evaluate infraPolicy EVA 2:
structure and program improvements.

Acquire data to determine most unsafe behaviors conES.5 tributing to collisions.

Project Recommendations
from the existing conditions analysis. Treatments and recommenda the Technical Advisory Committee, and the public, as well as the results Project recommendations were developed with input from City staff, -
Figure
tions to implement Vision Zero in El Monte involve a joint effort of the ES-5: Durfee Avenue Project Sheet: Between Magnolia Street and Denholm Drive Ten conceptual designs were developed for the highest-ranking seg national safety goals.
strongly encouraged to accelerate the achievement of local, state, and Evaluation. The implementation of proven safety countermeasures is six Es: Engineering, Education, Evaluation, Enforcement, Equity, and -
citywide, as well as more permanent and higher-cost solutions. Con low-cost “tactical urbanism” improvements that can be implemented are key to the implementation of safety improvements; they identify Technical Advisory Committee. The cutsheets for these ten locations ments of corridors identified on the high-injury network and by the -
improvement process to identify funding, undergo public and envi work. Higher-cost projects could be required to be part of the capital be integrated into planned construction such as resurfacing or utility struction of some of these improvements, like bicycle facilities, can -
are provided for low-cost projects and permanent installations. ronmental review, and plan preparation. Planning-level cost estimates Figure
ES-5 is an example cutsheet showing design possibilities for one of the corridors.
4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 3
5 3 3
3 3
3 2 2 1 2 2
2 2 2 2
(2009-2020)
Vision Zero Action Plan
ES6
Finally, signal timing can be modified to increase safety, including co “hardened centerlines.”
adding digital speed-readout signs, adding “turn wedges,” and adding adding median islands between intersections, adding curb extensions, turns (effectively continuing a median island through the intersection), where neither the major road nor the minor road are able to make left to Right-In-Right-Out only. “Restricted Crossing Intersections” are “Restricted Crossing Intersections” are where the minor road is limited commercial corridors. Measures that can be taken include installing most likely to have high-severity collisions: multi-lane roadways along heart of Vision Zero is taking a proactive approach on streets that are Aside from implementing projects on the corridors identified, at the -
the cycle length, which can reduce the pedestrian delay.

Turn-on-Red signs, adding Leading Pedestrian Intervals, and reducing ordinating the signals for slower progression times, adding No-Right1 Endnote:
calenviroscreen-40
Senate Bill (SB) 535. https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/ Introduction
01 Vision Zero Action Plan
2 1.1 Traffic Safety in El Monte
to develop a “Vision Zero Action Plan” to address traffic-related fatal resolution known as a “Vision Zero resolution,” leading to the request On February 21, 2017, the El Monte City Council passed a traffic safety -
vehicle collisions” and the “high percentage of traffic injuries and fa victims in El Monte that have been killed and injured due to motor This Plan resulted from that resolution. The resolution cites the “696 ities and serious injuries that occur throughout the City of El Monte. -

1.2 excessive speed being paramount to this effort.
as well as people walking and bicycling, with mitigating the impact of Consequently, this Plan has a significant focus on the safety of children accidental death among children ages 0 to 13 in the City of El Monte.” It points out that “traffic fatalities are one of the leading causes of talities involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and other vulnerable users.” Vision Zero Overview
has made a commitment to Zero Deaths.

Zero plans, and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Angeles County, and the City of Long Beach have all enacted Vision to dozens of cities across the country. The City of Los Angeles, Los in the first year of enactment since 1910. After NYC, Vision Zero spread safety measures, has seen the lowest number of pedestrian fatalities to the widespread implementation of innovative, low-cost pedestrian concepts were first adopted in New York City (NYC) which, mainly due been widely embraced around the world. In the United States the “Sustainable Safety” (aka “Vision Zero Plus”), and the concepts have developed “Vision Zero” and the Netherlands concurrently developed loss of life due to traffic collisions is acceptable. In the 1990s, Sweden guided by “Vision Zero,” a traffic safety concept which states that no traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries in El Monte by 2027. It is This El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan is an initiative to eliminate 2 a new perspective, a more systemic perspective. During the produc Department of Public Works and are now looking at traffic safety with In recent years there have been significant transitions in the El Monte -
tion of this Plan there were multiple meetings with the El Monte Deapproach to traffic safety. They are ready to use traffic calming to re forward to using the Vision Zero Action Plan to initiate a more proactive partment of Public Works - Engineering Division, and they are looking -
as a countermeasure.
cities that have embraced Vision Zero have focused on traffic calming speed has been shown to be a leading cause of traffic fatalities, and duce speeds, recognizing the impact of excessive speeding. Excessive Figure 1-1 below shows the impact of motor
20 MPH
death rate increases exponentially as speeds increase.
vehicle speed on the death rate of people walking, showing how the 90%
60%
20% 80%
40%
10%
40 MPH
30 MPH
If hit by a person driving at: Person Survives the Collision Results in a Fatality Figure 1-1: Collision Speed vs. Pedestrian Fatality Rate Introduction 01
3 1.3 Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety
characteristics that lead to more pedestrian-involved collisions research points to the benefits of identifying the types of roadway and characteristics before serious injury or death occurs. Recent it is necessary to identify and remedy dangerous roadway conditions Vision Zero is proactive rather than reactive. In practice, this means Research
1 and
location as a preemptive measure against collisions, see recommends proactively introducing safety projects at that type of of, for example, the intersection of two four-lane roads, the research locations. Even when there are no known collisions at the location recommends proactive measures to mitigate safety issues at those Figure 1-2.

1.4 The 94% Myth
been presented as the problem and seen as the cause of collisions. Un drivers, careless bicyclists, and distracted pedestrians have historically that human error causes most car collisions. Individual road users, bad At the heart of the traditional approach to traffic safety is the myth -
poor decisions of roadway users implies that nobody could have pre most collisions – “94% of them,” are solely due to human error. Blaming departments, licensing agencies, and media outlets frequently cite that falls on the person walking, bicycling, or driving. American transportation streets, in the United States, the responsibility for road safety largely like in Europe, which accepts that society at large is responsible for safer -
research study by the New York City Department of Transportation (NY focus should be in other places, such as reengineering roadways. A 2019 “more visible” and pedestrians to be “less distracted.” Data suggests the Many agencies in the United States focus on getting bicyclists to be implies an incident that is not preventable.
vented these “accidents.” Even using the term “accident” versus “crash” -
use by pedestrians does not appear to be disproportionately contrib CDOT) entitled “Distraction Shouldn’t be Deadly” found that “cell phone -
unsafe conditions.
that distracted drivers in cars and road users have to share the road in flaws in the transportation system. Those flaws mean, for example, framework, the road safety problem isn’t the individual but rather the road user education, and media campaigns. But in the Vision Zero perfecting human behaviors through strategies like licensing, testing, Consequently, traffic safety solutions have too often focused on walking contributes significantly to pedestrian fatalities and injuries.” NYCDOT found little concrete evidence that device-induced distracted uting to fatal pedestrian crashes,” and that “despite growing concerns, Traditional Approach Vision Zero Approach

APPROACHES TO TRAFFIC SAFETY

INEVITABLE
Traffic deaths are

PREVENTABLE
Traffic deaths are
human behavior
Assumes PERFECT
behavior
IMPERFECT human
Integrate
collisions
Aims to PREVENT
SEVERE collisions
Prevent FATAL &
responsibility

INDIVIDUAL
approach
Utilizes a SYSTEMS

EXPENSIVE
Saving lives is

EXPENSIVE
Saving lives is NOT
Figure 1-2: Vision Zero vs. Traditional Safety Approach Vision Zero Action Plan
4 1.5 Systemic Safety and the FHWA
people to think about the road system in its entirety, from infrastruc a “Safe System approach to road safety” – a holistic view that requires in implementing Vision Zero or “Systemic Safety.” They promote taking The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has taken a leading role -

1.6 different agencies involved.
steering committees and task forces with representation from all the injuries. One of the ways cities are implementing this is by creating and how all influence transportation-related fatality and serious design guidelines, public participation, policy, and vehicle regulations, how the whole system operates, including “upstream factors” such as ture projects to government agencies. This refers to understanding State/Regional Policy Context
and asking:

SCAG’s commitment begins with understanding existing conditions Transportation Safety and SCAG
to develop annual safety targets to comply with federal requirements. bicyclists. Each year, organizations such as SCAG work with the state Southern California, especially those most vulnerable, pedestrians and are committed to ensuring transportation safety for all people in safety. The State of California, Caltrans, SCAG, and local governments The FHWA isn’t alone in rethinking their approach to transportation What is happening? Where is it happening? When is it
happening? Who is it happening to? And, most importantly—Why is it SCAG funds safety plans such as this one.

As part of its commitment to improving safety across the regions, happening?
Source: SCAG Regional Transportation Safety Existing Conditions Report2

1. measures:

Each February SCAG establishes safety targets for five performance Number of Fatalities

2. Rate of Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

3. Number of Serious Injuries

4. Rate of Serious Injuries per 100 million VMT

5. world. We’re going to work, the grocery store, to visit our grand the world every day. The thing is, we aren’t going around the million miles every day. That’s equivalent to 17,911 trips around around. And we’re getting around a lot. We travel almost 430 We rely on our cars, buses, rail lines, bicycles, and feet to get half the entire state’s population, and 13 million licensed drivers. “Southern California is home to roughly 19 million people, about Injuries
Number of Non–motorized Fatalities and Non–motorized Serious -
With all that traveling, it’s not surprising that mistakes are get ma, and to our child’s soccer game.
-
Transportation Safety Existing Conditions Report
of these mistakes can last a lifetime.” - From SCAG’s Regional forgo the intersection to cross midblock. The consequences at a text message, rush to make it through a traffic signal, or ting made. At the wrong moment, we might take a quick glance 2 Introduction 01
5 »
allows SCAG to help cities to:
within a transportation network that carry a higher risk of injury. This location is dangerous. Rather, an HIN suggests corridor characteristics region. A HIN, however, is not an assessment of whether a street or where high concentrations of fatal and serious collisions occur in the SCAG also developed a high-injury network (HIN) to demonstrate Identify areas of need;
»
focus limited resources;
Provide agency staff with more information on where they can »
collision and serious injury; and
or disadvantaged communities are impacted by higher rates of Provide opportunities to understand how communities of concern » Assist with building greater public and political support. and Active Streets Working Group, a Transportation Safety Program In addition, SCAG provides additional resources in the form of the Safe 1 and the Go Human Campaign.

1.6.1 Transportation Safety and Caltrans
Plan (SHSP)
Through the development of the 2020-24 Strategic Highway Safety 3 , Caltrans has emphasized the underlying goal of making state transportation leaders from a wide range of organizations recog zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries a reality. In summer 2020, -
»
statewide data-driven traffic safety plan:
membership, and adopting four guiding principles in the updated as “The Pivot” - led to focusing on high-priority areas, expanding SHSP troubling trends in traffic safety. This important change - referred to nized a bolder and more focused approach was necessary to combat Integrating equity into all aspects of the plan
» Implementing a Safe System Approach
» Doubling down on what works
» Accelerating advanced technology
In addition, grant programs like the Active Transportation Program pro efforts such as Local Road Safety Plans and Systemic Safety Analyses. agencies with grant opportunities to fund various road safety planning To advance safety across the state, Caltrans assists regional and local -
vide funding for bicycle and pedestrian safety infrastructure projects. fatalities and serious injuries by 2050, and seeing deep, quanti “Caltrans is irrevocably committed to achieving zero traffic -
going forward.” - Toks Omishakin, Caltrans Director
fiable and consistent reductions in those numbers in the years policies, like automated enforcement, can assist in the overall effort. unless it also manages the speeds on the roads and considers how safe system by just focusing on one aspect, like redesigning roadways, manner, through a wide range of measures. El Monte won’t achieve a and the transportation network have to be addressed in an integrated interact. To create a safe transportation system, street users, motorists, The Vision Zero approach also examines how these different agencies Monte’s Vision Zero Action Plan.

Vision Zero Plans of their own. These plans have been referenced for El and Long Beach have equally committed to this goal by developing injuries on all streets, Los Angeles County and the cities of Los Angeles To follow Caltrans’ and SCAG’s lead on reducing fatalities and serious Vision Zero Action Plan
6 1.7 The Data-Driven Process

1.8 data-focused.

Action Plan is data-driven and the results and recommendations are and serious injuries. As shown in subsequent chapters, this Vision Zero in monitoring progress toward zero transportation-related fatalities the public to facilitate transparency, accountability, and assist the public reports. Data should be collected, analyzed, and be made available to of impacted communities, enforcement citations, and hospital injury it’s important to analyze other data sources such as the demographics needs to be gathered on where and how crashes happen. In addition, When approaching road safety from a Vision Zero perspective, data At its core, Vision Zero has an emphasis on data-driven decision-making.

Vision Zero Toolbox - The 6 Es
Countermeasures are grouped into the following categories, the 6 Es:

1. Education

2. Encouragement

3. Enforcement

4. Engineering

5. Equity

6. Evaluation

1.8.1 Education
practice safe roadway behavior. New, widespread education A key component to keeping streets safe is to learn how to and flyers can be created and mailed to residents.
of media can be considered including social media and newspapers, Markings where bicyclists share the road with motor vehicles. A variety use existing Class 3 Sharrow streets, which are streets with Shared Lane bicyclists. A key education effort is typically to educate drivers on how to on how and when motorists are required to yield to pedestrians and on others when they are in collisions and therefore the focus will be safe behaviors for road users. Motorists have a disproportionate impact to develop and distribute information related to collision statistics and A typical strategy is to create and implement a public Safety Campaign El Monte.
kids ride around. They can be held in schools and other locations around demonstrations, and a practice course, generally in a circle, which the and exercise often. Events can include lectures, workshops, inspections, sizes, all while having fun and getting encouragement to use active travel generally ages 6-14. Children learn how to ride bicycles of all shapes and a Bicycle Rodeo. A Bicycle Rodeo is a bicycle safety event for children, becomes a part of the culture of safety. One typical education event is efforts involving community partners will help to ensure everyone Encouragement Education Enforcement
Engineering Equity Evaluation
Introduction 01
7 1.8.3 Enforcement
and has been active in its effort to reduce traffic fatalities in The El Monte Police Department has been an effective partner effective way to increase safety.

Finally, ticketing vehicles blocking the bicycle lane is another simple and of traffic fatalities, and both can be reduced with red light cameras. broadside collisions from crossing traffic are two of the leading causes Light Running Enforcement for drivers at intersections. Left turn and out signs. Another common strategy is to implement automatic Red of Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) and “No-Right-Turn-On-Red” blank most effective immediately following the installation of the initial phase turning at high speeds and hitting people walking, enforcement would be intersections. In particular for the City of El Monte, where motorists are is a campaign targeting enforcement of turning vehicles at signalized than pedestrians crossing the street illegally. One common strategy shown that high motor vehicle speeds lead to more pedestrian fatalities collisions while minimizing victim blaming of pedestrians. Research has on the driving behaviors shown to cause fatalities and serious injury to also promote safe streets. Ideally, enforcement of Vision Zero focuses must be sensitively applied and other strategies can be depended on some community members feel unsafe. Consequently, enforcement Research has shown that the presence of police can sometimes make a visible enforcement presence without generating economic hardship. warnings and education, rather than issue tickets and fines. This creates Department routinely conducts high-visibility traffic stops to provide safety enforcement practices. The City of Fremont, California, Police critically important part of Vision Zero. Different cities have various traffic Under the Influence (DUI) checkpoints to reduce impaired driving, a El Monte. They have an on-going drunk driving campaign using Driving

1.8.2 Encouragement
culture in El Monte where people feel comfortable using Encouragement in Vision Zero involves creating a safety engage in more walking and bicycling, a program similar to the “Smart that targets the “interested but concerned” part of the population to typical encouragement program is an individualized marketing program and bicycling, and that includes both fatalities and serious injuries. A the more people walk and bicycle, the lower the crash rate is for walking a phenomenon known as “Safety in Numbers,” which has shown that related to bicycling and walking. However, researchers have identified encouraging more people to walk and bicycle will reduce collisions the travel mode of their choice. For some it is counterintuitive that -
Trips” program. SmartTrips4 is from the City of Portland, where the City transit. They host free community events, provide helpful tools, encour provides resources for getting around by walking, bicycling, and public -
Example of Vision Zero advertising used in San Francisco about how to travel by active and sustainable modes.
age more people to travel by foot and by bicycle, and give information Vision Zero Action Plan
8 1.8.4 Engineering
and people make mistakes, but those mistakes should not The central thesis of Vision Zero is that people are vulnerable walk in traffic.
motor vehicles, around a construction site so they are not required to and bicycling. People walking are given a protected space, away from ensure safe and predictable movements – especially for people walking use creative and low cost solutions like signal timing modifications to on keeping people safe on the streets during construction. Cities will such as people walking and bicycling, and develop strategies that focus to develop Temporary Traffic Control policies for vulnerable populations, traffic safety during construction. One measure many cities incorporate is speed limits. Engineering safety is not just about what is built, but about through a combination of design practices, traffic calming, and lower mass differential between user groups, and lowering operating speed improving visibility, separating traffic flows where there is speed and Zero street designs reduce the likelihood of severe traffic collisions by Engineering plays a key role in creating forgiving roadways. Vision lead to fatalities or serious injuries. Rather, roads should be “forgiving.”

1.8.5 Equity
system, the Vision Zero approach presents both opportunities In terms of advancing equity in El Monte’s transportation stakeholders to frame and shape conversations to be clear and inclusive. means thinking carefully about language and enlisting the help of key impacted most directly by traffic safety problems. Moreover, it means including residents and leaders representing those communities early and consistently in internal and external communications. That communications tasks, City and community leaders prioritize equity are traditionally underserved. It is critical that along with their other community, particularly those that are most vulnerable and those that realities of how traffic safety issues affect all populations within a inequities in El Monte. Vision Zero is about communicating the Communication is key to improving traffic-related disparities and a historic prioritization of motor vehicle speed and mobility over safety. system design is often inadequate to protect vulnerable users, due to when they are involved in a traffic collision. Current transportation and motorcyclists are more likely to experience severe or fatal injuries communities of color. Vulnerable road users like pedestrians, bicyclists, is disproportionately concentrated in low-income communities and infrastructure, and more. El Monte’s Vision Zero High-Injury Network deaths due to varying factors, including higher pedestrian activity, older neighborhoods with vulnerable populations have higher injury rates and many of these communities; studies in various jurisdictions reveal that older adults, and youth. Furthermore, there is intersectionality between homelessness, people with disabilities, limited English proficiency, low income populations, communities of color, those experiencing disproportionately higher rates of fatal and serious collisions include environmental, and political conditions. Communities that experience that result from unjust and unfair differences in social, economic, and challenges. Inequities in severe and fatal injuries are those Introduction 01
9 1.8.6 Evaluation
most overlooked aspects of a Vision Zero program. A baseline Evaluation and monitoring is among the most important yet injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. create an effective strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe El Monte’s Vision Zero Action Plan was built on the six Es of Vision Zero to engagement in analyzing conditions.
and using the data. It is critical to conduct rigorous outreach and It’s important to recognize the biases in data and those in interpreting proportion of collision data is not desegregated by race and ethnicity. safety experiences among vulnerable road user groups, and a large bias in reporting. Collision data may not accurately reflect the roadway crashes, and there are at times, errors in collision reports. There is also is collected. Data has limitations. There is often an under-reporting of results. At the same time, the City will need to calibrate any data that improvements where they are needed most and deliver cost-effective for data collection, analysis, and sharing will help the City to target track, measure, and achieve goals. Improving and expanding methods traffic safety problems and the efficacy of solutions are necessary to data to better evaluate and track Vision Zero goals. Clear data about combine hospital trauma data (where available) with police crash Zero goal, even incremental progress. It is recommended that El Monte evaluation program is needed to track progress made in the Vision Scheider et al., 2020. Journal of Transport and Land Use 1 Endnotes:
. https://www.
2 jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1825
SCAG Regional Transportation Safety Existing Conditions Report. https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2021-transpor3 tation-safety-full-report.pdf?1641417608
2020-24 Strategic Highway Safety Plan. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/ 4 2024-shsp-implementation-plan-march-2021-a11y.pdf
dot-media/programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/2020- City of Portland SmartTrips. https://www.portland.gov/transportation/walking-biking-transit-safety/smarttrips Vision Zero Action Plan
10 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
02 Existing Conditions
Vision Zero Action Plan
12 where they are needed the most. Many of the State’s active transbenefit disadvantaged communities since residents in these commu portation and road safety planning and implementation funds directly -
These demographics place the City of El Monte into three distinct En some other race, and 0.1% American Indian and Alaska Native.

American, 0.7% identifying as two or more races, 0.3% identifying as 65% Hispanic or Latino, 30% Asian, 3.4% White, 0.7% Black or African with a median age of 38.2. The racial and ethnic makeup in El Monte is family-oriented or “young” community based on the age distribution El Monte has a diverse population. The City can be categorized as a nities rely on walking, bicycling, and using transit every day. -
Bill 535. Environmental Justice refers to the fair treatment and mean Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and Senate vironmental Justice designations identified through SCAG’s Regional -
ingful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national orienforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies. gin, or income with respect to the development, implementation and 115,477
Population

38.2 Median Age Median Income
$50,829
Housing Units
29,893
Demographic Profile
RACE
65% 3.4%

0.7%

0.1%
30%

0.3%

0.7%
Hispanic or Latino White
Black or African American
American Indian & Alaska Native
Asian
Some Other race
Two or more races
Figure 2-1: El Monte Population Growth

2.1 Overview of El Monte
El Monte is a city of approximately 115,477 people located in the subalong Interstate 10. From 2010 to 2019, the population grew by ap urban San Gabriel Valley about 12 miles east of downtown Los Angeles -
Figure 2-1
proximately 1,800 people for a 10-year growth rate of 1.6 percent, see . SCAG forecasts that El Monte will grow to 137,500 people Approximately 72% of the City’s 9.6 square miles (6,174 acres) is devel by 2045, a 16% increase in the intervening 26 years (2019 to 2045). -
everyday is critical to ensuring Vision Zero strategies are employed Evaluating the demographics of the residents that use these streets considered living in poverty.
limit is $47,850, which 19% of the City’s households fall below and are and assistance programs by county. The County’s Low Income Level limits that determine the eligibility of applicants to various housing of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is required to set income Los Angeles County’s median income of $80,000. The U.S. Department The City’s median household income is $50,829 which is well below density of 27 people per acre in 2019.
oped for residential uses, resulting in an average residential population Existing Conditions 02
13 2.1.1 Disadvantaged Community Designation
(DAC) according to Senate Bill 535 which lists disadvantaged commu The City of El Monte is designated as a Disadvantaged Community -
nities using the results from CalEnviroscreen 3.0. El Monte falls withby multiple sources of pollution, see identify California communities that are disproportionately burdened CalEnviroScreen is a screening methodology that can be used to help in the 25% of the highest scoring census tracts in CalEnviroscreen.

Figure 2-2.

Figure 2-2: Disadvantaged Communities Designation
«¬60
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Garv ey Ave
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
Durfee Av e
Baldwi n Av e
Santa An ita Av e
Ramo na Blv d
Peck Rd
Peck Rd
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
Templ e City Blv d
Ro semead B lv d
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
City Boundary
Communities
Disadvantaged

2.1.2 Community of Concern
Strategy also identified the City of El Monte as a Community of Con SCAG 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities -
highest concentration of minority population and low-income house upper one-third of all communities in the SCAG region for having the cern (COC). A COC is a Census Designated Place (CDP) that falls in the -
holds, see Figure 2-3.

Figure 2-3: Communities of Concern Designation
«¬60
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Garv ey Ave
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
Durfee Av e
Baldwi n Av e
Santa An ita Av e
Ramo na Blv d
Peck Rd
Peck Rd
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
Templ e City Blv d
Ro semead B lv d
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
City Boundary
Concern
Communities of
Vision Zero Action Plan
14 According to the Connect SoCal Plan Performance Environmental Juswith the number of residents over 65 expected to double. The pop and EJAs is also expected to outpace the aging trends in the region, tice Technical Report, the rise in older adult population in DACs, COCs, -
in DACs, COCs, and EJAs. Disproportionate increases in white, non-His outpace all other race/ethnicity groups, and will be more pronounced ulation growth rate for non-Hispanic Asian residents is expected to -
transportation and land use decisions and the pursuit of grant fund diversity, provides the opportunity to utilize these designations for of life for the residents of El Monte. The City’s unique demographic Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy will help improve the quality many of the goals and strategies from the Regional Transportation Being identified as these three environmental justice designations, panic population growth are anticipated to occur in DACs and COCs. -
Through analysis in Chapter 2, bicycle and pedestrian collisions rep key component of this Plan.
ing. Equity is one of the “Es” that plays a key role in Vision Zero and is a -
core elements of developing a Vision Zero Plan. These elements un of the high-injury network, goals and strategies, and the six Es are the the age of 85 are second at 10%. Analyzing collisions, the identification represents 17% of the fatal and severe injury reports and people over

13.5 severe injuries per year. Surprisingly, the 20-24 age demographic collisions in the City of El Monte with an average of three fatalities and trend could grow. Between 2008-2019, there were 929 police-reported are also disproportionately affected, and as our population ages, this resent 40% of traffic collisions in the City of El Monte. Older adults -
behaviors, unforgiving roadway designs, lack of bicycle and pedestri part, these aren’t “accidents.” Collisions are often the result of poor believes death and injury on city streets is preventable. For the most derlie the core of the worldwide and local Vision Zero movement that -
data-driven analysis
for human error, coupled with targeted education, engagement, and street designs that emphasize safety, predictability, and the potential Zero Action Plan must approach the problem from multiple angles – an facilities, and lack of community engagement. The El Monte Vision

2.1.3 Environmental Justice Areas
Figure 2-4
Strategy, the City of El Monte is also identified as an EJA, as shown in SCAG’s 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities low-income households than are seen in the region. According to (TAZs) that have a higher concentration of minority population OR Environmental Justice Areas (EJAs) are Transportation Analysis Zones .

Figure 2-4: Environmental Justice Areas
«¬60
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Garv ey Ave
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
Durfee Av e
Baldwi n Av e
Santa An ita Av e
Ramo na Blv d
Peck Rd
Peck Rd
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
Templ e City Blv d
Ro semead B lv d
Lo wer Azusa R oa d
Ty ler Av e
Val ley Bl vd
City Boundary
Justice Areas
Environmental
Existing Conditions 02
15 Table 2-1: Percent of Commute Modes
Table 2-2: Average Commute Times (minutes) by Mode

COMMUTE
MODE 1

CITY OF EL
MONTE

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY

CALIFORNIA
STATES
UNITED
Walk 1.9% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7%
Bicycle 0.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.5%
Transit
Public 4.7% 5.8% 5.1% 5.0%
Carpool 13.3% 9.5% 10.1% 9.0%
Drive Alone 75.3% 74.0% 73.7% 76.3%
1Commute mode statistics per jurisdiction in this table do not sum to 100% because it does not include work from home or commutes by ‘other means.’ AVERAGE COMMUTE TIME BY MODE 1

COMMUTE
MODE

CITY OF EL
MONTE

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY

CALIFORNIA
STATES
UNITED
All Modes 31.8 32.8 30.7 27.6
Drive Alone 30.2 31.8 29.5 26.4
Carpool 35.7 34.4 33 28.5
Transit
Public 51.3 53.4 52.7 50.6
1Commute times by walking and bicycling are not available from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

2.2 Transportation Context
business districts in the greater Los Angeles area, most notably down El Monte and surrounding cities are bedroom communities of central -
to work, and 75.3% of these commuters drive alone. The average com town Los Angeles. Approximately 49,600 El Monte residents commute -
minutes. For the 4.7% of El Monte commuters who take public tran mute time for individuals driving alone in a personal vehicle is 28.7 -
sit, the average commute time is 53.1 minutes. Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 commute times by commute mode of El Monte residents.
provide comparisons for the percent of commute modes and average share) the percent of each transportation mode for commuting is in Though commutes account for less than 20% of all trips (< 20% mode -
projects. The law changed the way local jurisdictions analyze trans Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for publicly- and privately-initiated changed the method of traffic analysis required through the California With the adoption of Senate Bill (SB) 743, the State of California for other trip purposes in the City.
share in El Monte indicates that personal vehicles are a primary mode dicative of the mode share for all trips. The current commute mode -
1, 2020. SB 743 will bring a shift in residential development and com measures to reduce those impacts. SB 743 became effective on July portation impacts from development projects and identify mitigation -
for active transportation such as walking and bicycling, and partici reduced or “mitigated” by options such as increasing transit, providing impacts on the environment for CEQA review. These impacts will be by “vehicle miles traveled” or VMT – be used to assess transportation 743 requires the amount of driving and length of trips – as measured used on-road congestion or level of service (LOS) is being replaced. SB The previous practice of evaluating traffic transportation impacts mute patterns.
-
densities of people closer to transit and their workplace, placing great Transit-oriented development and mixed land uses will put higher requirements to their unique communities.
pating in mitigation banks. All jurisdictions have the option to tailor -
transportation modes.
er emphasis on infrastructure and safety for active and non-vehicular Vision Zero Action Plan
16 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION (CALTRANS) MILES
Interstate 13.8
Other freeway or expressway 0.0
Other principal arterial 16.2
Major collector 18.1
Minor collector 17.9
Local 142.7
Table 2-3: Functional Classification of El Monte Roadways1

2.3 Challenges and Opportunities
The built environment in El Monte presents both challenges and op2.3.1 portunities for transportation safety.

Built Environment - Challenges
these long blocks, intersections may be the only place to cross an ar Arterials in El Monte cover long distances between intersections. In Distances Between Intersections
-
Monte are few. Ramona Boulevard from Peck Road to La Madera Ave terial with any safety against cross traffic, as midblock crossings in El -
nue is an example of a long block. This 0.33-mile stretch has high-deninvite crossing outside of crosswalks. across arterial roads where long distances between intersections may area would allow. Safe routes to nearby destinations can be enabled

0.25 miles, which is 300% farther than a safe midblock crossing in this walk to a bank across the street, residents would have to walk at least sity housing on one side and a commercial area on the other. To safely The difference in speeds between local roads and arterial roads pre Speed Differential
-
El Monte, observed speeds are often higher due in part to the long dis Though the speed limit is 35 miles per hour on most arterial roads in sents a safety challenge between drivers and non-motorized users. -
tances between signalized intersections that invite speeding. For drivers on a local road turning onto an arterial road, speeding traffic deand reaction time related to speeding vehicles on arterial roads is exac in the path of travel. For bicyclists or pedestrians, the speed differential creases the reaction time needed to adjust to unanticipated vehicles -

2.3.2 follow the shortest “desire line” to destinations on the other side. erbated, especially with the temptation to cross arterials midblock to Built Environment - Opportunities
residential neighborhoods convenient vehicular access to longer-dis motorized road users well. Local roads intersect arterial roads, giving The gridded road network in El Monte serves the accessibility needs of Gridded Road Network
-
needs of non-motorized users if appropriate safety infrastructure ex tance routes. The grid structure has the potential to also serve the -
ists. The greatest need for safety infrastructure is where local roads inMany of El Monte’s residential neighborhoods have local roads that in uses and destinations to which people may want to walk or bicycle. speeds and volumes, but their corridors also have more diverse land tersect an arterial road - not only do these roads have higher traffic -
tersect with arterial roads (Table 2-3 and Figure 2-5).

Frequently-visited destinations such as parks, schools, and commer Destinations
-
by active and non-motorized modes.
these destinations may increase the percentage of trips that are taken cial areas are often located along or near arterial roads. Safe routes to Existing Conditions 02
17 ¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Caltrans Functional Classification
Local
Minor Collector
Minor Arterial
Other Principal Arterial
Freeway or Expressway
Interstate
Figure 2-5: Caltrans Functional Classification
Vision Zero Action Plan
18 2.4 Collision Summary

2.4.1 Data
(SWITRS) for the 11-year period from 2008-2019 was used for this sum Collision data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System -
injury, fatality, or over $1,000 in damage. This summary focuses on fa the California Highway Patrol for motor vehicle collisions resulting in mary. SWITRS is a database of statewide collision data collected by -

2.4.2 property damage-only collisions.
tal, severe, and visible injury collisions, and excludes minor injury and Overall Traffic Collision Trends
this period, 929 collisions were auto-only, 252 were pedestrian-in A total of 1,543 collisions occurred in El Monte from 2008 to 2019. Over -
2009 and 2020.
traffic collisions; El Monte has not met this goal in any year between The goal of Vision Zero is zero deaths and zero severe injuries due to (39.7% of total) involved pedestrians or bicyclists.
volved collisions, 362 were bicyclist-involved. In total, 614 collisions Figure 2-6 shows the number of fatal and severe injuries over the study period, and Figure 2-7 shows the number of bicydeaths can have a high number of severe-injury collisions. number of deaths. Furthermore, as was the case in 2019, a year of zero show that years of zero deaths can be followed by years with a high partial data shows six roadway deaths in 2020. Both 2013 and 2020 seven in 2013. Data for the complete year of 2020 is unavailable, but average over the study period is three deaths per year with a high of there were zero deaths on El Monte roadways in 2012 and 2019, the clist- and pedestrian-involved collisions over the study period. Though Figure 2-6: Fatal and Severe Injuries in El Monte
Figure 2-7: Bicyclist- and Pedestrian-Involved Collisions 2019
929 362 252
Existing Conditions 02
19 2.5 Collision Mapping Overview
Understanding the roadway conditions where severe-injury and fathat have been the location of the highest number of pedestrian-in is known as the “high-injury network” identifies segments of roadway in other places before these types of collisions occur. Mapping what tal collisions occur is fundamental to addressing unsafe conditions -
Collision mapping was performed in the following two ways:
in the same conditions as the high-injury network.
tree” grouping method helps identify clusters of collisions that occur be remedied citywide where clusters of collisions occur. A “collision the characteristics of high-injury road segments, these conditions can volved, bicyclist-involved, severe-injury or fatal collisions. By learning

1. A high-injury network method that ranks road segments by

2. study period
weighting the collisions that occurred on each segment over the A collision tree method that groups and maps collisions by the roadway conditions where they occurred.

2.5.1 High-Injury Network
form a high-injury corridor where safety improvements can be imple segments of roadway with a high number of collisions that together Injured-KSI) collisions. The goal of this method is to identify connected with concentrations of fatal and severe injury (Killed or Significantly The high-injury network (HIN) method identifies segments of roads -
auto-only collisions are also weighted 25% more than non-fatal col collisions are weighted 25% more than auto-only collisions. Fatal mented. With this method, bicyclist-involved and pedestrian-involved -
lisions. Figure 2-8 shows the process for identifying high-injury segpedestrian-involved collisions on the same road segment. sum of relatively fewer auto-only collisions combined with bicycle- or ments. For both methods, larger sums indicate more collisions, or a Figure 2-8: High-Injury Network Method
Vision Zero Action Plan
Figure 2-9 shows the mapped result of the method shown in Figure 2-8. The map legend shows that a HIN “score” (or KSI, the sum of fatal as a percentile compared to all road segments in El Monte ( (divided) by the length of the respective road segment and expressed type or combination of collision types. The HIN score is normalized and severe collisions per road segment) can be translated to a collision Figure
2-10). Road segments from the 75th to 100th percentiles have the highest number of pedestrian-involved, bicyclist-involved, severe-incitywide. jury or fatal collisions for their length compared to all road segments Figure 2-10 shows disparate segments make up the high-inlarger collision dataset that includes minor injury collisions.

To help connect the segments, the same method was applied to a southern El Monte at Peck Road and Garvey Avenue.
exist in northern El Monte at Peck Road and Lower Azusa Road, and in improvements. Examples of these disconnected high-injury segments jury network, from which it is difficult to identify corridors for safety Figure 2-11
index” (CI) to differentiate it from the high-injury network. shows the results of this larger dataset, summarized as the “collision Figure 2-12
as was done for the high-injury network in
shows the results of the collision index normalized by segment length, Figure 2-10. This method
the high-injury network to identify the broader corridors for safety im identifies more road segments that together link the segments from -
provements.

Chapter 3) identified corridors of concern that correlate to the corri The project Technical Advisory Committee (TAC; described further in -
El Monte) and segments of Durfee Avenue north of Ramona Boule TAC also identified Parkway Drive (south of Durfee Avenue in southern TAC did not identify, such as Peck Road and Ramona Boulevard. The of the TAC corridors of concern, and helps identify corridors that the dors identified by CI method. The CI method identifies parts of most -
vard. These segments were likely identified by the TAC because of condid not include these segments, the combination of this data-driv were either low in number or non-existent. Though the HIN method cerns with vehicle speeds in residential neighborhoods, but collisions -
safety improvements.
a comprehensive picture of the corridors that can be focused on for en CI method together with community input from the TAC help give 20 Existing Conditions 02
21 ¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Cumulative KSI
High-Injury Network (KSI)

8.75 (multiple possible collision combinations)
5 (5 auto-only collisions OR 4 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collisions )

3.75 (3 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collisions)

2.5 (2 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collisions)

1.25 (1 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collision)
No collisions
Figure 2-9: Cumulative Fatal and Severe Injury (KSI) Network Vision Zero Action Plan
22 ¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Normalized KSI (percentiles)
High-Injury Network (KSI)
75 -100th
50 -75th
25 - 50th
1 -25th
No Collisions
Figure 2-10: Normalized Fatal and Severe Injury (KSI) Network Existing Conditions 02
23 ¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Cumulative CI
20 - 26.75 (multiple possible collision combinations)
10 - 20 (multiple possible collision combinations)
5 - 10 (multiple possible collision combinations)

2.5 - 5 (multiple possible collision combinations)

2.5 (2 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collision)

2.25 (1 auto-only + 1 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collision)

2.0 (2 auto-only collisions)

1.25 (1 bicyclist- or pedestrian-involved collision)

1.0 (1 auto-only collision)
No collisions
Figure 2-11: Cumulative Collision Index (CI)
Vision Zero Action Plan
24 ¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Normalized CI (percentiles)
Collision Index (CI)
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Corridors of Concern identified by the
75-100th
50-75th
25-50th
1-25th
No collisions
Figure 2-12: Normalized Collision Index (CI)
Existing Conditions 02
25 2.5.2 Using a Collision Tree for Hotspot Analysis
where they occurred. Each collision type (pedestrian-involved, bicy to classify collision data according to the roadway characteristics A data classification method known as a “classification tree” was used -
The first tier of the tree relates collisions to one of three general road clist-involved, and auto-only) is classified in its own tree. -
way locations:

1. Intersection: the footprint at the junction of two or more roads

2. where vehicle turning movements occur
Intersection “influence area”: the length of road 200 feet along all legs of an intersection where vehicle accelerating, brak3. ing, lane-changing, and merging occur
Midblock: the road segment between intersection influence areas where vehicles achieve peak speed
of intersection control; signalized controls (stop lights) or non-signal The second tier is unique only to intersections, and relates to the type -
The third tier relates to the existence of and type of medians: no me ized controls (stop signs).
-
This collision classification tree - or “collision tree” - method quanti one to six lanes.

The fourth tier relates to the number of through-lanes, ranging from dian, painted medians, or raised medians.
-
A.1
fies collisions according to common characteristics (Appendix Section ). In each collision tree, blue boxes indicate the highest number of For all collision types, the highest number of collisions occurred at in collisions per tier.
-
(
(146) occurred at signalized four-lane intersections with no median tersections. For auto-only collisions, the highest number of collisions Figure 2-14), followed by signalized two-lane intersections with no (
(58) occurred at signalized four-lane intersections with no median For pedestrian-involved collisions, the highest number of collisions median also had a high number of auto-only collisions (63). median (49 collisions). Non-signalized four-lane intersections with no Figure 2-15), followed by non-signalized two-lane intersections with no median.
(
(54) and non-signalized four-lane intersections (49) were nearly equal For bicyclist-involved collisions, non-signalized two-lane intersections Figure 2-16).

Mapping collisions according to their common roadway characterthese similar collisions occur ( istics can help identify “hotspots,” or locations where clusters where Figure 2-14, Figure 2-15, and Figure 2-16).

Where clusters of collisions share similar characteristics, recommendations from this project may be applied. Alternatively, further idenFigure 2-13 on-street parking.
such as intersection geometry, sight lines, existence of driveways, or tification of collision factors can remedy unique roadway conditions, is an example of a crash tree occurring at intersections. crash trees can be found in Appendix Section
An overview of the High-Injury Network with additional mapping and A.1.

Figure 2-13: Auto-Auto Collision Tree
Auto-auto collisions
2009 - 2019
Total number of
auto-auto collisions
936
Lanes
Median
Control
Intersection
to Intersection
Location Relative
1 Lane
1 2 Lane
79 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
146
5 Lane
1 4 Lane
63 5 Lane
1 4 Lane
4 2 Lane
92 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
63 5 Lane 2
6 Lane
1 4 Lane
35 6 Lane
9 4 Lane
16 6 Lane
17 6 Lane
1 No
Median
228
Median
Painted
81 Median
Raised
5 No
Median
159
Median
Painted
44 Median
Raised
16 Signalized
314
Non-signalized
219
Intersections
533
Collisions
Highest Number of
Vision Zero Action Plan
26 !
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
! !! ! ! !
!
! ! ! !!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!! ! ! ! !!! !
!
!!! ! !
!
!
!! !
! !
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!! ! !
! ! !!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
! ! !
! !
! ! ! !
!
! !! !! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!!! !! ! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!!!
!!
!!!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!!!!! !! !! !!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at signalized 4-lane intersections with no median Auto-only collisions
!! 146
All auto-only collisions at signalized intersections
! 314
Figure 2-14: Auto-Auto Signalized Intersection Collisions Existing Conditions 02
27 !
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at non-signalized intersections with no median Bicycle-involved collisions
!! 2 through-lanes (54)
!! 4 through-lanes (49)
All bicycle-involved collisions at non-signalized intersections ! 135
Figure 2-15: Bicycle-Involved Non-Signalized Intersection Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
28 !
! !
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
! ! !!!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !! !!!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!! !!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at signalized 4-lane intersections with no median Pedestrian-involved collisions
!! 58
All pedestrian-involved collisions at signalized intersections ! 98
Figure 2-16: Pedestrian-Involved Signalized Intersection Collisions Existing Conditions 02
29 2.6 Planning and Policy Context
goals, objectives, strategies, and policy recommendations made with planning efforts affecting the El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan. The The following documents comprise the primary local and regional -
the City of El Monte to improve to meet Vision Zero. For each docu in this Plan build from the following plans, which provide context for -
»
ment, relevant policies, goals, and excerpts are provided.

Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)2
» Strategic Highway Safety Plan (2021)3
» SCAG Transportation Safety and Security Technical Report (2020)4 » Los Angeles County Vision Zero (2019)5
» Los Angeles Metro Active Transportation Strategy Plan (2016)6 » City of Los Angeles Vision Zero (2017)7
» City of Long Beach, A Vision Zero Action Plan (2020)8

2.6.1 Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)2
streets. Other leading Vision Zero cities are showing the power of re The passage of AB 43 in 2021 is an important step forward for safer Safety Baseline
-
cities have more control in setting speed limits within their jurisdic limits increased on streets with frequent speeding. Now, with AB 43, percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, resulting in cases where speed risk speeds. Prior to AB 43, speed limits were set based on the 85th duced speed limits, both in bringing down average speeds and high- -
The fact that a street had high crash rates and large numbers of peo tion, including considerations for the safety of vulnerable road users. -
»
Safety Goals and Strategies
communities to set lower speed limits to keep streets safe. ple walking and bicycling was previously irrelevant. AB 43 will allow Authorize local authorities to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrian groups » Establish a prima facie (default) speed limit of 25 miles per hour on state highways located in any business or residence district »
20 or 15 miles per hour on these highways.

Authorize Caltrans and a local authority to declare a speed limit of »
subject to a warning citation.
to a business activity district and require that certain violations be Authorize a lowered speed limit on a section of highway contiguous » If speed limits set by engineering studies are not found to be reaup to 20% of their roadways as ”safety corridors” additional five miles per hour, and through this process designate sonable and safe, local jurisdictions can reduce speed limits by an Covers of Vision Zero Reports
Vision Zero Action Plan
30 2.6.2 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
(2021)3
»
Safety Goals
14,000 serious injuries reported in 2017 on the SWITRS. and serious injuries. The Plan notes nearly 3,900 fatalities and over events to determine effective strategies to reduce roadway fatalities developed using the data findings and input from regional outreach The 2020–2024 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) was Collision Baseline
and systemic biases
Integrate equity into all aspects of the plan to address institutional »
roadway system
and serious injuries for all road users through a holistic view of the Implement a safe systems approach which aims to eliminate fatal » Continue with strategies and actions that are most effective in reducing fatalities and serious injuries, implement proven countermeasures, and encourage innovative solutions »
safety groups, manufacturers, and government partners to prior forming new partnerships with technology providers, health and Encourage the use of advanced technology in and on roadways by -
itize safety
provides actions to remedy them, as shown in
Using a data-driven approach, the SHSP identifies challenge areas and Safety Strategies
Figure 2-17.

CHALLENGE
AREAS
CA

FATALITIES

AND SERIOUS

INJURIES

SAMPLE ACTIONS
Speed
Management
/ Aggressive
Driving
34%
and vehicle safety over vehicle LOS
and prioritize pedestrian, bicyclist, and transit

3. Develop countermeasures to reduce speeds
law, easy to understand

2. Make speed limit setting methodology, and
that prioritize the safety of all road users

1. Implement context-sensitive speed limits
Pedestrians 17%
street crossing crashes

3. Educate pedestrians about distracted
pedestrian-related crashes
better evaluate infrastructure and predict

2. Develop pedestrian count models to
methodology for pedestrians

1. Establish a High Injury Network (HIN) study
Bicyclists 7%
regarding bicycling traffic law
Training (POST)/Safety Training materials

3. Update Police Officer Standards and
bicyclists
intersection crashes for pedestrians and

2. Develop design guidelines that reduce
bicyclists
developing a High Injury Network (HIN) for

1. Establish a preferred methodology for
Intersections 23%

2. Install Retro-reflective Backplates on signals
in lowering traffic crash rates at intersections
effectiveness of increased traffic enforcement

1. Document and educate about the
Distracted
Driving 5%
evidence-based strategies for parents

2. Implement distracted driving education and
driving
aged students about reckless and distracted

1. Increase outreach and education to collegeFigure 2-17: Traffic Challenge Areas and Remedies Existing Conditions 02
31 2.6.3 SCAG Transportation Safety and Security
Technical Report (2020)4
»
Safety Goals
in the SCAG region.
conducted, 66% of the network is in the disadvantaged communities of the region’s population). Based on the regional high-injury network all fatal collision victims are 65 and older (they make up about 12% region’s population) and 9% of all traffic collision victims and 16% of of fatal collision victims are under the age of 18 (about 24% of the in Southern California. About 10% of all traffic collision victims and 5% seriously injured, and 136,000 are injured in traffic collisions each year On average between 2012 and 2016, 1,500 people are killed, 5,200 are Collision Baseline
Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, and travel safety »
mode options
Increase maintenance, enforcement, and construct new travel »
children, walkers, and bikers
Start with supporting Disadvantaged Communities, older adults, »
goods
Increase travel choices to increase the throughput of people and Safety Strategies

1. Reduce aggressive driving and speeding through:
»
and aggressive driving
Public outreach campaigns specifically addressing speeding » Identifying locations of speed-related crashes
» Setting safe and reasonable speed limits

2. Improve safety for aging population through:
»
support right-of-way decisions by older road users
Roadway, intersection, and interchange improvements that »
shorten crossing distances
curb extensions, bulb-outs and pedestrian refuge islands that Implementing design treatments that support safety such as » Working with Transit Network Companies (TNCs) to explore programs that support transportation options for older adults » Establishing Safe Routes for Seniors programs

3. Improve bicyclist safety through:
» Connecting bicycle facilities, including regionally significant bicycle corridors for bicycle travel throughout the region »
plans
Developing and implementing active transportation master »
all modes—as fundamental principles of transportation plans Adopting Complete Streets policies—providing safe access for

4. Improve safety at intersections through:
» Incorporating intersection safety into the planning grant strategy » Incorporating Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) at high incident intersections to reduce red-light violations causing collisions »
pedestrians, signalization at problem non-signalized intersec limited to clearly marked crosswalks, median sanctuaries for Implementing infrastructure improvements including but not -
changing intersection geometries to improve safe
tions, advanced stop bars and sharks teeth, yield markings, and

5. Improve pedestrian safety:
» Continuing to work with local jurisdictions to provide a comprehensive education for all road users » Developing pedestrian safety action plans based on FHWA criteria. » Ensuring all sidewalks and intersections are ADA compliant » Considering pedestrian needs in all roadway and transit projects Vision Zero Action Plan
32 2.6.4 Los Angeles County Vision Zero (2019)5
roadways (including those resulting in complaints of pain, visible in were involved in 9% of all injury collisions on unincorporated County on unincorporated County roadways by 2035. Although pedestrians 2000-2005 to achieve the goal of eliminating traffic-related fatalities This Vision Zero Action Plan focuses on the County’s efforts between Collision Baseline
-
Three guiding principles will direct decision making as the County im Safety Goals
collisions on unincorporated County roadways were 15 to 34 years old. 2017, nearly half (48%) of those who died or were severely injured in involved in 20% of fatal and severe injury collisions. Between 2013 and juries, severe injuries, and fatal injuries) from 2013 to 2017, they were -
»
plements Vision Zero actions:
lead to health inequities
practices that disadvantage some populations over others and Health Equity: Reduce gaps in health outcomes by addressing the »
happening and prioritize projects and programs in these areas Data-driven process: Identify where and why traffic collisions are »
safety
about progress, and how the County is working to enhance traffic Transparency: Maintain regular communication with the public »
Safety Strategies
Enhance County Processes and Collaboration
» Address Health Inequities and Protect Vulnerable Users » Collaborate with Communities to Enhance Roadway Safety » Foster a Culture of Traffic Safety
» Be Transparent, Responsive, and Accountable

2.6.5 Los Angeles Metro Active Transportation
Strategy Plan6
throughout Los Angeles County. Active transportation by bicyclists and pe This plan focuses on improving infrastructure for active transportation Collision Baseline
-
»
Safety Goals
by 99% and can reduce sidewalk riding by over 90%.
50%. The addition of physical barriers for cyclists can drop the rate of injury 40% of traffic fatalities. Installing bicycle lanes can reduce cycling injuries by destrians accounts for 19% of all trips in Los Angeles Metro but accounts for Improve access to transit
» Establish active transportation modes as integral elements of the countywide transportation system »
activity
areas of heavy traffic, high transit use, and dense bicycle and pedestrian Enhance safety, remove barriers to access, or correct unsafe conditions in » Promote multiple clean transportation options to reduce criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, and improve air quality » Improve public health through traffic safety, reduced exposure to polluttransportation as a way to integrate physical activity into their daily lives ants, and design and infrastructure that encourage residents to use active »
all residents have greater transportation choices and access to key desti Foster healthy, equitable, and economically vibrant communities where -
nations, such as jobs, medical facilities, schools, and recreation »
Safety Strategies
active modes
Identify improvements that increase first last-mile access to transit by » Work with partners to create a regional active transportation network » Develop supporting programs and policies related to education, enforcement, encouragement, and evaluation »
guidelines to guide future investment
Provide guidance for setting regional active transportation policies and »
implementation
Develop a funding strategy and explore opportunities to expedite Existing Conditions 02
33 2.6.6 City of Los Angeles Vision Zero (2017)7
»
Safety Goals
injured are youth and older adults.
almost half of all traffic deaths, and 30% of those killed or severely and bicycling are involved in only 15% of all collisions, but account for bicycling are over-represented among traffic deaths. People walking injuries in collisions and 201 people were killed. People walking and traffic-related deaths by 2025. In 2013, 978 people suffered severe This goal of the City of Los Angeles Vision Zero plan is to achieve zero Collision Baseline
Reduce citywide traffic deaths by 20% by 2017, prioritizing pedestrian deaths involving older adults and children » Eliminate traffic deaths citywide by 2025
»
Safety Strategies
it is also the smartest tactic to achieve zero deaths
Focus on vulnerable road users is not only an ethical objective, but » Develop a Safe Routes to School Action Plan
»
crosswalks, which restrict vehicle turns for a brief period while al Implement engineering safety countermeasures such as scramble -
lowing people to cross the street in all directions
»
at signalized intersections
when entering the intersection—improve the yielding rate of drivers Leading pedestrian intervals, which give a pedestrian a “head start”

2.6.7 Safe Streets, Long Beach, A Vision Zero
Action Plan (2020)8
The Long Beach Vision Zero Action Plan provides analysis and rec Collision Baseline
-
ommendations to help reduce fatalities and serious injury from vehicrash victims on Long Beach are bicyclists, pedestrians, and motor need to reverse this trend. A high percentage of fatal and serious injury fatalities and serious injuries from 113 in 2013 to 162 in 2017 and the cle-related crashes. The plan highlights an increase of traffic-related -
arterials. However, minor arterials have 40% more traffic collisions re network has four times more miles of local streets than miles of minor which these road users were involved (14%). The Long Beach roadway cyclists (65%) compared to the percentage of all traffic collisions in -
»
Safety Goals
goal is to eliminate fatal and serious traffic collisions by 2026. sulting in death or a serious injury. The overall Long Beach Vision Zero travel lane widths
Increased safety for all by reducing vehicle speeds and reduced »
sides of the street
Increased bicyclist safety with protected bicycle lanes on both »
crosswalks
Improved pedestrian visibility at intersections with continental »
zones (intersections and driveways) with green markings in the pro Increased motorist awareness and bicyclist visibility at conflict -
tected bicycle lane
»
circles
Reduced potential for severe collisions with roundabout and traffic » Prioritized bicyclist and pedestrian travel with signage and pavement markings »
reducing vehicle speeds with corner bulbouts
Increased bicyclist and pedestrian safety by improving visibility and »
continental crosswalks
Improved pedestrian safety with reduced crossing distance and Vision Zero Action Plan
34 »
Strategies that the City is prioritizing to reduce collisions include:

Safety Strategies
Better street design to improve traffic safety
» More and better education about traffic safety
» More enforcement of traffic violations
»
Overall actions that are being implemented for Vision Zero include:

Dedicating Resources to Vision Zero Actions-a new Vision Zero Coordinator position » Building Safe Streets-reduce motorists speeds, protected bikeways, sidewalks, crosswalks »
transit, walking, bicycling, collisions
Improving Data and Transparency-collect more and better data on » Promoting a Safety Culture-Expand Safety Education Campaign »
Schools, AARP, Local Groups, SCAG
Enhancing Processes and Partnerships-City partnering with Go Human, County, Caltrans
»
low-income areas)
Equity-Prioritize investments at high-injury locations (frequently in

2.7 Vision Zero Benchmarking
Daly City, Long Beach, and Santa Ana - to learn more about their ap team interviewed five jurisdictions - the City of Berkeley, Culver City, In California, there are many examples of Vision Zero in action. The -
illustrated in
proaches to Vision Zero. The main takeaways from each interview are Table 2-4. Additionally, the City of Fremont Vision Zero but most cities continue to experience increases in fatalities or num In the United States, there are over 40 cities with Vision Zero policies, results since adopting a Vision Zero Plan in 2016.

Plan was reviewed for benchmarking because of their demonstrated -
urbanism includes low-cost changes to the built environment to im - have implemented wide-scale use of “tactical urbanism.” Tactical in fatalities and serious injuries - notably, San Francisco and New York bers that remain static. Cities that have seen impressive reductions -
in terms of built-environment characteristics and traffic safety solu The City of Fremont, California is an excellent comparison to El Monte least small lessons to be learned from each city.

Not all cities are ideal to compare to El Monte, but there are usually at tactical urbanism projects for El Monte to advance Vision Zero goals. prove safety and accessibility. This Plan recommends several low-cost -
major metropolitan core areas.
cities are bedroom communities located approximately 15 miles from to be used as a model city for Vision Zero practices. Moreover, both El Monte, yet the road network structure is similar enough to El Monte tions. Fremont has twice the population and one-fourth the density of Existing Conditions 02
35 CITY EDUCATION ENCOURAGEMENT ENFORCEMENT ENGINEERING EQUITY EVALUATION Berkeley » Project website
» Branding
»
opportunities
Seek out grant
»
of Vision Zero capi
Increased number
-
tal projects
»
reduce speed limits
have the power to
local agencies to
Advocating for
» Legalizing automated enforcement
» Quick-build projects»
police department
enforcement from
Separating traffic
Culver City » Project website
» Targeted camadults and seniors
paigns for working
»
to older adults
Focus on outreach »
software updates
improve data and
is using funds to
Police Department
»
patrol
Increase police
»
funding
for infrastructure
Pursue grants »
Bicycle and Pedes
Policies from the
-
trian Action Plan
»
committees
data goes to traffic
Annual data report,
Daly City » Outreach and community events
»
opportunities
Seek out grant »
with police
Monthly meetings » Quick-build projects» Work with San Mato better under teo County Health
-
programs equitably
deliver projects and
stand inequities to
»
reports
through 5-year
Measure success
Fremont »
program
Vision Zero sticker
»
Safety” Program
Corps “Look for
Youth Service
»
with traffic en
Monthly meetings
-
engineers
and transportation
forcement officers
»
traffic stops to pro
High-visibility
-
education
vide warnings and
»
street segments
more than 50
speed limit on
Lowered posted
» Quick-build projects
» The Engage Fremont initiative»
crash reports with
Engineers receive
Transportation
-
crash.
in 30 days of the
»
such hot spots
data to identify
historical crash
Fremont evaluates
Long Beach »
of traffic
lanes with direction
riding in bicycle
Education about » Automated enforcement» Analysis to decrease speed limits» schools and vari
education at
Bicycle and safety
-
ous neighborhoods
» Improve data collection methods
Santa Ana » Outreach events
» Bicycle rodeos
»
schools
and parents at
Teaching children
»
opportunities
Seek out grant »
with police
Quarterly meetings
»
citations
more speeding
Police handing out
»
funding
for infrastructure
Pursue grants
»
surveys
plan and sidewalk
complete streets
Developing
» Attend local neighsafety
and pedestrian
to discuss bicycle
borhood meetings
» Inclusive commuprojects
for complete street
nity engagement
»
surveys at intersec
Conducting speed
-
tions with improvements
Table 2-4: California Vision Zero Projects 6 Es Takeaways Vision Zero Action Plan
36 2.7.1 Mapping in Fremont
There are many reasons why Fremont is considered one of the best exthey’ve witnessed a significant drop in their traffic fatalities and se amples on how to reach Vision Zero, besides the obvious reason that -
mapped in AutoCAD for use by the transportation department. Crash rious injuries. For starters, when a severe-injury or fatality occurs, it is -
which can be as simple as installing signage and vertical posts to im es that are clustered together indicate opportunities for improvement, -
most need, not the most vocal, ensuring that dollars are spent equita future infrastructure projects are based in the communities with the prove driver yielding. Moreover, since the map is frequently updated, -

2.7.2 bly and efficiently
Partnerships in Fremont
relies on high-quality quantitative and qualitative data to make de Fremont maintains strong internal cross-agency partnerships and -
These partnerships extend outside the planning department. For ex be a year or more after a crash occurs.
of a crash, much faster than in many other cities, where the wait may transportation engineers typically receive crash reports within 30 days developing design plans, which the city already had in place. Fremont The map is generated using AutoCAD, software typically reserved for work closely together to maintain a map of high-risk crash locations. example, the Public Works Department and the Police Department cisions, often in real-time, thanks to radar speed feedback signs. For -
ample, the Fremont Police Department largely conducts high-visibilwithout generating economic hardship. tickets and fines. This measure creates a visible enforcement presence ity traffic stops to provide warnings and education, rather than issue

2.7.3 Engineering in Fremont
Traffic engineers in Fremont use innovative techniques to solve probK-rail in the bicycle buffer, which protected bicyclists and forced mo (NACTO) approved 10-foot travel lanes, a buffered bicycle lane, and a with narrower, National Association of City Transportation Officials in a vehicle in a backyard swimming pool, the City restriped the curve surface treatment, but with little success. After a crash that resulted “traditional” solutions, such as curve warning lights and high friction was often featured in the media as a crash hot spot. Fremont tried lems. For example, the City’s infamous high-speed “Grimmer Curve” -
locations for people walking. Forty crosswalks in Fremont were un Similar to El Monte, Fremont also has limited accessibility crossing occur on multi-lane roads in El Monte with crash issues. since the improvements were installed in 2016. Similar projects could impressive. There have been no major crashes on the Grimmer Curve torists to drive at slower, safer speeds. The results were immediate and -
after 2015. From 2013 to 2015, Fremont saw nine major crashes involv schools, which witnessed more than 400 traffic safety improvements Fremont’s safety improvements focused in large part on their 40 roadways (known as “road diets”).
use “white” LED lights, and decreased the number of lanes in several speeds on more than 50 street segments, converted its streetlights to as “protected intersections,” upgraded dozens of crosswalks, reduced of the City’s arterial roadways, built Dutch-style intersections known alike in a relatively short period of time. Fremont also restriped 47% to improve safety for drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users made extensive use of inexpensive, temporary, “quick-build” projects controlled and located on multi-lane, high-speed roadways. The City -
from 2018 to 2020.
ing individuals 15 years of age or younger. It had just one such crash Existing Conditions 02
37 2.7.4 National Vision Zero Benchmarking
Proulx, and Hamideh Moayyed undertook the largest Vision Zero pe A research team led by Robert Schneider, Rebecca Sanders, Frank Research
-
years or less. The results were groundbreaking and will likely have pro lost their lives along a specific, 1,000-meter stretch of road in eight more than 60 “hotspot” corridors where at least six pedestrians had 62,000 incidents across 16 years, the researchers generated a list of destrian fatality research study of its kind. After studying more than -
limits of over 30 mph, a speed at which an estimated 40% of pedes of traffic in order to reach the other side. More than 75% had speed lanes or more, and 70% forced pedestrians to cross at least five lanes residents walk every day. A remarkable 97% of the hotspots had three same: ultra-wide, blisteringly fast, and flanked by businesses to which No matter the location, the design of the deadly roads were much the found implications on how pedestrian safety is designed in the future. -
by retail, grocery, or other essential services. These results have impli trians will die when struck by a vehicle, and 100% of them were flanked -
motor vehicles is far from random. These tragic incidents are, large This research finds that where people walking are hit by people driving in an effective manner.
cations for the City of El Monte as they look to allocate limited funds -
and strategies to be used in El Monte, as explained in Chapter 6. from the large pedestrian fatality research set the stage for objectives Zero. Both the experience from the City of Fremont and the results it’s intuitive which roadways need proactive attention to reach Vision businesses that draw visitors. The research confirmed that generally part, very wide and fast, carrying a lot of car traffic, and flanked by walking (and, usually, also for bicycling and driving) are, for the most ly, predictable, and preventable. The roads that are deadly for people Highway Functional Classification Concepts, Criteria, and Proce 1 Endnotes:
-
2 cfm#Toc336872980
statewide/related/highway_functional_classifications/section03. dures Definition. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/ Assembly Bill 43. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavCli3 ent.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB43
Highway Safety Plan (2021)
California Safe Roads Implementation Plan for 2020-2024 Strategic . https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/
programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/2020-2024-shsp-im4 plementation-plan-march-2021-a11y.pdf
SCAG Transportation Safety and Security Technical Report (2020). https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2021-transpor5 tation-safety-full-report.pdf?1641417608
Los Angeles County Vision Zero (2019). https://pw.lacounty.gov/vi6 sionzero/
Los Angeles Metro Active Transportation Strategy Plan (2016). https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dtuy70ydn1pxf8o/AADhHaYBOnWXCity of Los Angeles Vision Zero (2017). 7 06uVDQ0K-Ssva?dl=0
https://viewer.joomag.com/
8 vision-zero-los-angeles/0915902001459876247?short
City of Long Beach, A Vision Zero Action Plan (2020). https://www. action-plan---07-07-20v2
longbeach.gov/globalassets/go-active-lb/programs/safe-streets-lb- Vision Zero Action Plan
38 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
03 Stakeholder Outreach and Engagement
Vision Zero Action Plan
40 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach and
In light of COVID-19 and the Governor’s stay-at-home order, tradition Engagement Overview
-
was created, state and local regulations prohibited all social gather members of the public. When the project’s public engagement plan al in-person outreach strategies were modified to safely engage with -
decals with a QR code to the project website
direction received from the Technical Advisory Committee. Sidewalk To drive online engagement, outreach tools were developed based on in-person community events like the El Monte Farmers Market. summer and fall of 2021, the project team was able to participate in project, and eventually, some in-person outreach was conducted. In used. State and local regulations were relaxed during the course of the early in the planning process, so alternative tools and strategies were with comments were enabled. Some events were not held or canceled and community engagement tools such as online surveys and maps team could not hold as many in-person workshops or pop-up events ings of more than 10 people. Due to COVID restrictions, the project 1 - as well as an educareceived in a manner consistent with public health directives.

Plan moving forward while ensuring that public input was adequately Input gained through online methods was fundamental in keeping the tional video - were created to garner more engagement for the project.

3.2 Stakeholder Outreach and
The overall goal of public outreach was to build awareness and sup Engagement Goals
-
project across a range of representative stakeholders to build commu port, and solicit feedback on community needs or concerns, for the -

1. project team focused on were:
nity ownership during the planning process. Three objectives that the Engaging vulnerable road users: Input from school-age children, collisions.
make up the largest percent of pedestrian- and bicyclist-involved older adults, and non-vehicle owners was important because they

2. Addressing the digital divide: Though early COVID-19 concerns the high percentage of minority, low income, and non-native Eng hold public outreach events. This was especially important to reach City events like the farmers market were later targeted to safely forced a retreat to online outreach methods, in-person, outdoor -
lish speakers in El Monte who have lower access to and engagement with online methods.

3. Communicating in a way residents will understand: Outreach materials were provided in English, Spanish, Mandarin, and Vietnamand Mandarin. ese, and staff at in-person events were fluent in English, Spanish, Community Engagement 03
41 3.3 Stakeholder Outreach and

3.3.1 providing surveys in their respective languages.
attention to the Hispanic, Vietnamese, and Chinese communities and outreach strategies were created to gather feedback, paying particular people of all ages and demographic backgrounds. Key messages and The project team developed an outreach strategy with ways to engage Engagement Strategies
Marketing Materials
» Marketing materials included content for the City website1 and print materials to post throughout the community.
»
posts, and newsletter text.

Marketing materials included a project fact sheet, social media updates and newsletter text came directly from monthly project up survey, and updates on any upcoming outreach events. Other project media posts included information on the project website, the online and print outreach to share project updates on the project. Social Social media posts and newsletter text enabled methods of digital Social Media Posts and Newsletter Text
website.

El Monte as well as a scannable QR code with access to the project sheet included details about what Vision Zero is and what it means for El Monte’s Social Media, and handed out at outreach events. The fact The project fact sheet was shared on the project website, the City of Project Fact Sheet
-
date meeting minutes.

City of El Monte? Check all that apply.

How would you best describe your relationship with the
Your top concerns related to personal motor vehicle are:

Your top concerns related to biking are:

Your top concerns related to using a wheelchair are:

What would encourage you to walk more in El Monte?
What would make it easier for you to bike more or use
other non-motorized wheeled transportation in El Monte? What would make it easier for you to use a wheelchair or to get to and around El Monte?
Your top concerns related to other wheeled modes, such as e-scooters and skateboards (not including wheelchair) are:

Your top concerns related to transit (bus, light rail) are:

Live and work in El Monte
Live in El Monte
outside city limits
Work in El Monte but live
Own a business in El Monte
Occasional visitor
Student in El Monte
Other

19 - 24 years old
0 - 18 years old
25 - 34 years old
55 years and up
35 - 54 years old
a disconnected sidewalk
Lack of sidewalks, or
Unmaintained and unsafe
network

sidewalks
Walking is not convenient for
me to travel to my destinations
conditions (high speeds, long
Exposure to unsafe traffic
crossings)
Other (please specify)

Road conditions
Traffic speeds
with bikes and other wheeled
Safety sharing the road
vehicles
Using my personal vehicle
travel to my destinations
is not convenient for me to
Other (please specify)

vehicle speeds
Exposure to high motor
Lack of infrastructure for bikes
comfortable riding a bike
Cannot ride/not
for me to travel to my
Biking is not convenient

destinations
Other (please specify)

Lack of sidewalks, or a

disconnected sidewalk
Unmaintained and unsafe
ADA curb Ramps (lack of or
sidewalks
poorly designed ramps)
vehicle speeds
Exposure to high motor
my destinations
necessary for me to travel to
Using a wheelchair is not
Other (please specify)

Continuous and connected

sidewalks
Wider sidewalks
Street lighting
Marked crosswalks
Slower traffic speeds
Street trees/parkways
Protected crossings
(signals or stop signs)
bulb outs, median islands, or
Shorter crossings (with
road diets)
Other (please specify)

On-street bike lanes
Off-street bike paths
Electric bike (e-bike) share
Bike share
Lighting
Electric scooter share
Bike parking
Street trees
On-street physically
Slower traffic speeds

separated bike lanes
Other (please specify)

Continuous sidewalks
Repair of damaged sidewalks
ADA curb ramps (slope
leading to street from sidewalk)
painted lines on pavement)
Marked crosswalks (clearly
Reducing speed of cars
Street trees/parkways
Street lighting
I don’t use a wheelchair
Wider sidewalks
Other (please specify)

vehicle speeds
Exposure to high motor
Lack of infrastructure for bikes
comfortable riding
Cannot ride/not
are not convenient for me to
Other wheeled modes

travel to my destination
Other (please specify)

Lack of human activity
Lack of lighting
Vagrancy
Criminal activity
Excessive graffiti/vandalism
Missing seating
Missing transit shelter
or scheduling information
Missing transit wayfinding
Using transit is not
Transit stop location
my destinations
convenient for me to travel to
conditions (high speeds, long
Exposure to unsafe traffic
crossings)
Other (please specify)

What is your age?
Your top concerns related to walking are:
5 6
7 8
4 3
2 10
11 12
13 14
1 9
Name:
updates.

Provide your contact information for future project

Email:

Zip Code:
project considers the safety needs of all modes of transportation: typically The goal of El Monte Vision Zero is to create safer streets for El Monte. This

EL MONTE VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN SURVEY
vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists in order to create recommendations for improvements to transportation safety citywide.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/NWPCTCK
online, please visit:

To fill out this survey
modes?
How frequently do you use the following transportation
Daily Weekly Monthly Every Never now &
then
• Transit (bus, light rail)
• Personal vehicle
• Bicycling (including electric)
• Walking
• Wheelchair
• Other wheeled mode
• Other (please specify)

How safe do you feel when using these modes?
I do not feel Somewhat safe Very safe
• Walking
• Biking
• Wheelchair
safe at all

PROJECT GOALS
• Analyze where and why crashes are
occurring in El Monte
• Identify projects and programs to
related fatalities and serious injuries
reduce crashes and eliminate traffic-
• Develop and apply policies for
increasing safety for all modes of
transportation.
• Develop traffic safety projects for
implementation.

As part of the El Monte Vision Zero Plan, the City of El Monte and Go Human invite you to experience and share your feedback on proposed street safety would like to see bicycle and pedestrian improvements throughout the City.

Monte. Visit us at the El Monte Farmers Market to provide input on where you improvements that make it safer and more enjoyable to walk, bike, and roll in El Date: September 30, 2021
When: 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.

Where: El Monte Farmers Market (on Main Street between Santa Anita Ave and Tyler Ave)
Your safety is our priority. We want to hear from you!
https://arcg.is/n9TqG
please visit:

For more information,
The El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
tools and guidance to make bicycle
(EMVZAP) will provide the necessary
residents. Vision Zero seeks to eliminate
and pedestrian environments safer for
mobility for all.
while increasing safe, healthy, equitable
all traffic fatalities and severe injuries,
Examples of Flyer, Fact Sheets, and Social Media Posts
Vision Zero Action Plan
42 3.4 Project Website
the project’s duration. It contained an over
opportunities. The StoryMap was active for
that provided project information and input
The project website was an ESRI StoryMap
-
the project website, such as the online com
visitors to input information. Examples from
view of the project and an interactive map for
-
Project Website QR code
ment map are displayed on the right.

Project StoryMap
Community Engagement 03
43 3.5 Technical Advisory Committee
TAC were invited by City staff to broadly represent El Monte’s commu School District, and Mountain View School District. Participants in the Urban Gardens, El Monte City School District, El Monte Union High Active San Gabriel Valley (ActiveSGV), Caltrans, City of El Monte, Eco related to the Plan, including representatives from Access Services, professionals from eight organizations with subject matter expertise The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was an advisory body of 10 -
on engagement plans and findings, promoting engagement opportu nity needs and interests. The TAC was tasked with providing feedback -
nities to their networks, and giving input on Plan needs and recomTAC meetings were held virtually on:
the project:
mendations. The TAC met via video conference four times throughout »
TAC Meeting #1 - January 19, 2021
efforts were being made
Focus on the project overview and what community outreach »
brought up unsafe speeds and unsafe road/sidewalk conditions Open discussion on the safety of roadways in El Monte, many »
TAC Meeting #2 - October 26, 2021
Monte
Discussed concerns about bicyclist and pedestrian safety in El »
and project recommendations
Reviewed the High-Injury Network, updates on outreach events, »
TAC Meeting #3 - January 20, 2022
Reviewed and discussed draft plan
»
TAC Meeting #4 - February 10, 2022
Reviewed and discussed the final plan
Los Angeles County Fire Department to understand future roadway re Additional consultations and presentations were conducted with the -
quirements for emergency vehicles; the City of El Monte Traffic Safeenforcement and solicit ideas to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. and the El Monte Police Department to understand challenges in traffic ty Committee to gain technical feedback on proposed improvements; Members of the TAC on Zoom meeting
Vision Zero Action Plan
44 3.6 Outreach Tools

3.6.1 Sidewalk Decals
To draw and engage more public attention to the project website, online survey, and comment map, the project team installed 20 tempo3.6.2 traffic from May 16 to June 1, 2021.
rary sidewalk decals throughout El Monte in areas of high pedestrian Educational Video
A two-minute educational video was created that introduced the conCity of El Monte’s social media handles and on the project website. and examples of safe roadway designs. The video was posted to the cepts and goals of Vision Zero through statistics for traffic collisions Sidewalk Decals
Infographic in Educational Video

3.7 Outreach Events

3.7.1 Farmers Market #1
booth included interactive activities such as dot voting, games, and in event due to COVID-19 restrictions. The El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan The August 19, 2021 Farmers Market event was the first in-person outreach -

3.7.2 flashing beacons (RRFB).
street trees, docked bicycles, separated bikeways, and rectangular rapid amenities from the dot voting boards were: bus shelters, urban greening/ formation for the location and type of proposed improvements. The top Farmers Market #2 / Go Human
2021 was paired with a
Public outreach at the second Farmers Market event on September 30, Go Human event to demonstrate some of the

3.7.3 bicycles.
neighborhood greenway, RRFB, urban greening, scooter-share, and docked Some of the top features chosen by the public were: multi-use paths, of these features with residents and hand out surveys to gather feedback. demonstration site, a team member was available to discuss the benefits the farmers market, including a parklet and an artistic crosswalk. At each proposed improvements. There were demonstration projects throughout Public Presentation of Draft Action Plan

3.7.4 opens the opportunity to discuss traffic safety with friends and neighbors. very positive, with a member commenting that they like that this project to answer any questions that arose. The feedback from the public was Plan was presented to the public, chapter by chapter with additional time Action Plan was hosted on Zoom due to COVID-19 restrictions. The draft The January 27, 2022 public presentation of the draft El Monte Vision Zero Public Presentation of Final Action Plan
Action Plan was presented to the public, with time to answer any ques Action Plan was hosted on Zoom due to COVID-19 restrictions. The final The February 8, 2022 public presentation of the final El Monte Vision Zero -
tions. Discussion focused on ways to improve traffic safety on main arterial roads and locations in the City where bicycle lanes could be improved.

Community Engagement 03
45 What We Heard:
and these walking and bicy
“El Monte is a wonderful city
-
cling improvements could
attract more people.”
What We Heard:
“I enjoy the way this plan
addresses safety and opens
the opportunity to discuss
traffic safety with friends
and neighbors.”
What We Heard:
“Having on-street bicycle
lanes would make me want
to use my bike more.”
Public Presentation
Farmers Market #2
Farmers Market #1
Vision Zero Action Plan
46 3.8 Online Survey
The results from the 81 respondents were analyzed and used to devel throughout the City.
safety concerns while walking, bicycling, and using a mobility devices The online survey was sent out to El Monte residents addressing -
used different types of transportation, the results showed that per were between the ages of 25-54. When asked how frequently they respondents lived in El Monte and the majority of survey respondents and bicycle facilities. According to the survey results, 83% of survey current view of people’s opinions, concerns, and desires for pedestrian are included in Appendix A.3. The survey also provided the City with a op the recommendations shown in Chapter 6. Complete survey results -
»
concerns expressed for each category were:
vehicle, transit, walking, bicycling, and using a mobility device. The top were also asked their concerns when it came to using their personal sonal vehicles, walking, and transit were utilized most. Respondents Vehicle: road conditions, traffic speeds, and safety sharing the road with bicycles and other wheeled vehicles
» Transit: lack of lighting, homelessness, and missing transit shelters » Walking: lack of sidewalks or disconnected sidewalks and unmaintained sidewalks » Bicycling: lack of infrastructure for bicycles and exposure to high motor vehicle speeds and volumes
» Mobility Device: lack of sidewalks or disconnected sidewalks and unmaintained sidewalks
Road Conditions
Vehicle
Lack of Lighting
Transit
Lack of Sidewalks
Walking/ Wheelchair
Lack of Infrastructure
Bicycling
Community Engagement 03
47 more. Similarly, on-street bicycle lanes, separated bicycle lanes, bi were all elements that would encourage El Monte residents to walk El Monte. Wider sidewalks, street lighting, and street trees/parkways what would make using these methods of transportation easier in about the ease of walking, bicycling, and using a mobility device and Along with asking about residents’ concerns, the survey also asked -
residents to bicycle more. Residents who use a mobility device stat cycle-share, and improved street lighting would encourage El Monte -
device felt somewhat safe, and 31% did not feel safe at all. 39% not feeling safe at all. Half of the individuals who use a mobility that they did not feel secure, with 47% feeling somewhat safe and did not feel safe at all. In terms of bicycling, more residents mentioned 60% felt somewhat safe, 21% of respondents felt very safe, and 19% safe” traveling in El Monte. The results indicated that when walking, transportation modes, a minority of survey respondents felt “very walking, bicycling, or using a mobility device in El Monte. Across all Additionally, residents were asked to rank how safe they felt when get around El Monte.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ramps would make it easier to ed that the repair of damaged sidewalks, continuous sidewalks, and What is your age?
How safe do you feel bicycling/ walking/ using a mobility device in El Monte? Vision Zero Action Plan
48 1
Endnotes:

El Monte’s Public Works-Vision Zero. https://www.ci.el-monte. ca.us/291/Public-Works
04 Vision, Goals, and Objectives
Vision Zero Action Plan
50 4.1 Vision Statement
The vision for this Plan is adapted from the national Vision Zero Networks’ Vision Statement to:
while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mo
eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries,
Develop programs and projects in El Monte to
-
bility for all El Monte community members.
benchmarking.
safety, starting with emulating best practices from other cities with on City streets. This Plan lays out steps to take to reach that level of grows, more people will be walking, bicycling, taking transit and driving they go, or how they get there. As the region and El Monte’s population El Monte streets should be safe for all roadway users, no matter where

4.2 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies
Table 4-1
the goal of zero fatalities.
to provide El Monte with best practice strategies to employ to reach of the shortest timeframe to implement. The intent of this chapter is started or if the plan or program should be ongoing. They are in order provides an estimated completion time once the program has been needs and the ability to reach the goal of zero fatalities. The timeframe allow the City to determine the best strategy to meet community The intent of this chapter is to provide best practice strategies to transportation planning documents.
feedback from TAC members; and the review of local and regional strategies; feedback received during the public involvement process; were prepared based on review and assessment of existing goals and and strategies presented in this section, are organized by the six Es and they provide the direction to achieve the vision. The goals, objectives, users. Goals and objectives are an integral part of any plan because objectives, and strategies to improve safety for all vulnerable roadway of the goals and objectives. This section outlines key Vision Zero goals, effective, safe and attractive facilities to all roadway users is the focus Improving the way El Monte residents travel throughout the City with summarizes the vision zero principles, goals, and objectives. VISION GOALS

OBJECTIVES

STRATEGIES
Analysis 04
51 Enhance safety education programs for all ages and abilities Objective: Develop and implement an array of educational strategies that will serve to inform bicyclists, pedestrians, drivers, and regional stakeholders about the El Monte Vision Zero program.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
and provide ongoing feedback.
users and provide community members with an opportunity to talk with City staff Use open streets events to promote understanding and empathy among roadway Ongoing Police Department
Works, Planning, Community Partners,
Mayor’s Office, Public
for aging adults.
program with the goal of eliminating crashes that lead to deaths and serious injuries Coordinate with LA DOT Livable Streets to develop a Safe Routes for Seniors (SR4S) Ongoing Partners, Police Department
Public Works, Planning, Community
Continue the 2018 Walking School Bus Program. Ongoing
Partners
Public Works, Planning, Community
roadway behaviors.

Develop a multimodal safety educational campaign targeted on the most dangerous 1-2 years Development, Community Partners
Public Works, Economic
program.

Engage local stakeholders to improve the regional awareness of the Vision Zero 1-2 years Development, Community Partners
Public Works, Economic
Conduct annual Bicycle Rodeos focusing on coordinating with schools and seniors. 1-2 years Police Department
Works, Planning, Community Partners,
Mayor’s Office, Public
Develop media campaign strategy.
years
Within 3 Public Works
and at school events such as Bike to School Day and Walk to School Week.

Expand youth-focused pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs in schools years
Within 3
Partners
Public Works, Planning, Community
Coordinate City and regional messaging for maximum impact. distracted and impaired driving and the benefits of seat belt, car seat, and helmet use. injuries and other dangerous driving behaviors. Highlight the prevalence and impact of ads/shelter ads, radio, social media) about the top crash factors in severe and fatal create traffic safety champions and shift culture through communication tools (bus Create culturally competent and accessible education campaigns and outreach to years
Within 3
Police Department
Works, Planning, Community Partners,
Mayor’s Office, Public

EDUCATION (EDU)

EDU GOAL
01 Vision Zero Action Plan
52 Employ quick-build bicycle and safety projects
Objective: To identify road safety projects with low-cost elements curb extensions on Popular Boulevard in northwest Alhambra. installed a temporary bike lane, high visibility crosswalks and Quick-Build example in August of 2021, Active SGV staff improvements that can be installed within months. In one Quick-Build projects are reversible, adjustable traffic safety that can be installed in a short time frame.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
to implement a quick-build.
bollards, landscaping and signage
alternatives such as striping,
this Plan to identify low-cost
Reference project examples in Ongoing Public Works
on
Continue to coordinate with SCAG
Go Human campaigns to install
schools.
with an emphasis near parks and
temporary demonstration projects
Ongoing
Recreation
Development, Planning,
Public Works, Economic
quick-build projects.
such as Caltrans SCAG to fund
Seek grant funding from agencies 1-2 years Public Works, Planning

EDUCATION (EDU)
02 EDU GOAL
Analysis 04
53 04 Design and promote human-centered streets
Objective: Prioritize streets for safety, aesthetics and placemaking to promote active transportation mobility.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
schools, parks and retail.
connectivity focused on bus stops,
Implement bicycle and pedestrian Ongoing Public Works, Planning gateways.
activity centers, neighborhoods, or
for special areas, historic districts,
to establish a character or theme
Utilize the streetscape and plazas Ongoing Public Works, Planning adjacent private property.
with similar environments of
environments that are integrated
and physically comfortable
to provide visually attractive
Utilize streetscapes and plazas Ongoing Public Works, Planning pedestrian network.
public art into the bicycle and
Integrate wayfinding, signage and Ongoing
Development, Planning
Public Works, Economic
schools
Provide for safe and comfortable safe routes to
Objective: Identify bicycle and pedestrian improvements and programs focused on schools to encourage more walking and bicycling.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
from schools.
pedestrian facilities within 0.5-mile
feedback on bus stops, bicycle and
Conduct surveys to gather Ongoing
Community Partners
Public Works, Planning,
safe routes to parks.
first and last mile connections and
bus stops and parks to support
connectivity within three miles of
Implement bicycle facility Ongoing Public Works, Planning safe routes to parks.
first and last mile connection and
of bus stops and parks to support
improvements within a 0.5-mile
Implement pedestrian Ongoing Public Works, Planning
Explore SmartTrips program
concerned” population of El Monte.
to focus on the “interested but
Target encouragement programs
1 .

Ongoing Public Works, Planning
Transit Plan.

Develop a First and Last Mile to 1-2 years Public Works, Planning roundabouts, bicycle facilities, etc.).
coordination, traffic circles,
roadway users (e.g. traffic signal
enhancing the safety of existing
Identify improvements aimed at 1-2 years Public Works, Planning to School Plans and Programs.
continue to apply for Safe Routes
schools and the school districts to
Continue to build partnerships with
years
Within 3
Community Partners
Public Works, Planning,
programs.

Explore bicycle and scooter share
years
Within 3
Development, Planning
Public Works, Economic

ENCOURAGEMENT (ENC) ENCOURAGEMENT (ENC)

ENC GOAL
01 02

ENC GOAL
Vision Zero Action Plan
54 04 campaigns
Partner with the Police Department to focus on traffic safety enforcement and educational safety Objective: Continue to collaborate with the El Monte Police Department to enforce traffic safety laws, regulations, educate on new bicycle and pedestrian facilities and develop evaluation and education programs.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
disproportionate impacts to communities of color.

Ensure that enforcement and equity are considered in all actions in this Plan to avoid Ongoing Works, Police Department
Manager’s Office, Public
Mayor’s Office, City
enforcement and proactively seeks opportunities to enhance existing initiatives. high priority corridors. Ensure the City employs proven methods of traffic safety Utilize existing funds or pursue funds to improve education and enforcement on Within 1 year Development
Works, Economic
Mayor’s Office, Public
Implement automatic Red Light Running Enforcement at intersections. 1-2 years Public Works, Police Department Red” signs.
following the installation of Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) and “No Right Turn on Target enforcement of turning vehicles at signalized intersections. Most effective 1-2 years Police Department
Public Works, Community Partners,
use. Coordinate City and regional messaging for maximum impact. of distracted and impaired driving and the benefits of seat belt, car seat, and helmet injuries and other dangerous driving behaviors. Highlight the prevalence and impact ads/shelter ads, radio, social media) about the top crash factors in severe and fatal create traffic safety champions and shift culture through communication tools (bus Create culturally competent and accessible education campaigns and outreach to years
Within 3
Police Department
Works, Planning, Community Partners,
Mayor’s Office, Public

ENFORCEMENT (ENF)

ENF GOAL
01 Analysis 04
55 Objective: Develop and implement a strategy that employs best planning, design, and engineering practices.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
or traffic calming measures.

Assess, identify and recommend high priority locations for safety improvements and/ Ongoing Public Works parks, and other youth-serving or older adult-serving facilities. locations for safety projects near school zones, routes to schools, transit corridors, priority locations. Use both qualitative and quantitative data to identify high priority Utilize the high-injury network methodology developed in this Plan to identify high Ongoing Public Works, Planning disabilities.
organizations to build support for safer streets by engaging seniors and people with Coordinate grants and other funding opportunities with community-based Ongoing Partners, Police Department
Public Works, Planning, Community
management strategies.
reduce speeding. Target identified high-injury corridors and intersections for speed Use traffic engineering solutions to help improve motorist behavior and help Ongoing Public Works, Police Departments to advance the City of El Monte’s Vision Zero program.

Identify, review and apply for additional grant funding opportunities that would serve Within 1 year Public Works Design Manual from an organization such as Caltrans or NACTO.

Train staff on Complete Streets planning and adopt an existing Complete Street 1-2 years Development, Fire Department
Public Works, Economic
align with Vision Zero goals.

Develop standards for how streets are built and how streets are repaved to better 1-2 years Public Works, Economic Development construction especially for vulnerable populations.

Employ temporary traffic control strategies that focus on keeping people safe during 1-2 years Public Works Identify resources and prioritize quick and/or low-cost improvements. 1-2 years Public Works especially for pedestrians and bicyclists.

Use signal timing modifications to ensure safe and predictable movements, 1-2 years Public Works Develop a data sharing portal that promotes transparency and accountability. 1-2 years Finance, Police Department
City Manager’s Office, Pubic Works,
disabilities, pedestrians, and bicycles.

Develop and implement policies and a plan to fully accommodate people with years
Within 2 Public Works, Planning
Ensure all intersections on the high-injury network have high visibility crosswalks. years
Within 5 Public Works
Improve infrastructure to increase roadway safety for all users

ENGINEERING (ENG)

ENG GOAL
01 Vision Zero Action Plan
56 03 equitable lens
Prioritize road safety investments through an
Objective: Ensure all roadway safety interventions are just and affected by traffic-related serious injuries and fatalities. equitable for communities of color, as they are disproportionately

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
state level.
and bicycle safety at local and
in favor of increasing pedestrian
Participate in policy reform efforts Ongoing
Works
Manager’s Office, Public
Mayor’s Office, City
communities of color.
disproportionate impacts to
all actions in this Plan to avoid
and equity are considered in
Ensure that demographics Ongoing
Department
Works, Police
Manager’s Office, Public
Mayor’s Office, City
enhance existing initiatives.
proactively seeks opportunities to
of traffic safety enforcement and
Monte employs proven methods
corridors. Ensure the City of El
enforcement on high priority
to improve education and
Utilize existing grant funds Within 1 year
Development
Works, Economic
Mayor’s Office, Public
City.
causes of crashes/ fatalities in the
continue to analyze the leading
Through guidance from this Plan, 1-2 years Public Works Lower Vehicle Speeds
Objective: Slow motorists down to make streets more inviting livability.
for people walking and bicycling to contribute to neighborhood

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
diets).
and repurposing travel lanes (road
installing traffic calming devices,
by AB 43), traffic signal retiming,
limit reductions (as authorized
high-injury network using speed
of slowing vehicle speeds on the
management plan with the goal
Develop a comprehensive speed 1-2 years
Departments
Public Works, Police
program.
streets through a 20 mph zone
Reduce speed limits on residential
years
Within 3
Departments
Public Works, Police

ENGINEERING (ENG) EQUITY (EQU)
02 ENG GOAL EQU GOAL
01 Analysis 04
57 04 vulnerable roadway users
Monitor and evaluate the success of investments in for
Objective: Annually monitor and document outcomes from infrastructure improvements.

STRATEGY TIMEFRAME RESPONSIBILITY
database.
the City’s sidewalk and curb ramp
Continue to build upon and update Ongoing Public Works
and schools.
for seniors, people with disabilities,
areas that have been prioritized
including locations focused on
traffic calming devices annually,
Complete a specified number of Ongoing Public Works
roadway improvements.
to evaluate collision rates along
high-injury network. Utilize the data
evaluate crash trends and the
Annually collect collision data and Ongoing
Department
Public Works, Police
goals.
to track and evaluate Vision Zero
(where available) with collision data
Collect hospital trauma data 1-2 years
Department
Public Works, Police
the next 3 years.

Optimize 50 traffic signals within
signal timing strategy. Example:
signals for all road users and pilot
Develop metrics to optimize traffic 1-2 years Public Works and accountability.
portal that promotes transparency
Develop a collision data sharing 1-2 years
Police Department
Public Works, Finance,
City Manager’s Office,
collection.
opportunities for improved data
Consider grant funding
data collection technology.

Collision Investigation Unit and
Evaluate the Traffic Division’s
years
Within 3
Department
Mayor’s Office, Police

EVALUATION (EVA)

EVA GOAL
01 Vision Zero Action Plan
58 EL MONTE VISION ZERO
GOALS

ASSEMBLY BILL
43 (2021)

SAFE ROADS

CALIFORNIA
IMPLEMENTA2020-2024 SHSP

TION PLAN FOR
(2021)
SCAG 2020
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY

TECHNICAL RE

AND SECURITY
-
PORT (2020)

LOS ANGELES

COUNTY VISION
ZERO (2019)
LA METRO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC PLAN (2016)CITY OF LA

ACTION PLAN

VISION ZERO
(2017) ACTION PLAN

A VISION ZERO

LONG BEACH,

SAFE STREETS,
(2020)
EDU 1.

EDUCATION
Enhance safety
all ages and abilities
education programs for X X X X X X X
EDU 2. Employ quickprojects
build bicycle and safety X
ENC 1.

ENCOURAGEMENT
Provide for safe
transit
to schools, parks and
and comfortable routes X X X X X X X
ENC 2. Design and
centered streets
promote human- X X
ENF 1.

ENFORCEMENT
Partner with the
campaigns
and educational safety
safety enforcement
to focus on traffic
Police Department

X X X X
ENG 1.

ENGINEERING
Improve
users
roadway safety for all
infrastructure to increase X X X X X X X
ENG 2. Lower Vehicle
Speeds X X X X X X X
Table 4-1: Safety and Vision Zero Core Principals
Analysis 04
59 EL MONTE VISION ZERO
GOALS

ASSEMBLY BILL
43 (2021)

SAFE ROADS

CALIFORNIA
IMPLEMENTA2020-2024 SHSP

TION PLAN FOR
(2021)
SCAG 2020
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY

TECHNICAL RE

AND SECURITY
-
PORT (2020)

LOS ANGELES

COUNTY VISION
ZERO (2019)
LA METRO ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIC PLAN (2016)CITY OF LA

ACTION PLAN

VISION ZERO
(2017) ACTION PLAN

A VISION ZERO

LONG BEACH,

SAFE STREETS,
(2020)
EQU 1.

EQUITY
Prioritize road
through an equitable lens
safety investments X X X X X X
EVA 1.

EVALUATION
Monitor and
vulnerable roadway users
of investments in for
evaluate the success X X X X X
Vision Zero Action Plan
60 walking-biking-transit-safety/smarttrips
City of Portland SmartTrips. https://www.portland.gov/transportation/ 1 Endnote
05 Proposed Best Practices, Policies, and Programs
Vision Zero Action Plan
62 5.1 Best Practice Policies and Programs
fatalities can be reached by improving conditions for walking, bicy where a primary goal is the reduction in serious roadway injuries and The focus of this section is the best practice policies to create a city Overview
-
planning policies, programs, and practices necessary to improve safe cling, and other modes of travel. This section summarizes key regional -
regional agencies. These best practice policies help to implement in between the various City departments, community partners, and The best practice policy examples are aimed to instill collaboration ty for all roadway users, with a focus on those walking and bicycling. -

5.1.1 feedback.
recommendations from other jurisdictions and TAC and community pages, were determined by analyzing policies, goals, objectives, and The policies recommended for El Monte, as shown in the subsequent road safety for all roadway users.
by walking, bicycling, and transit, and to educate the public on overall frastructure, amenities, strategies, and programs to encourage travel Policies
limits and reduce the posted speed limits on arterials to 30 mph or and parks. Moreover, the recommendation is to review arterial speed mph zones should be installed within an eighth of a mile of all schools Local streets with high collision history will be primary priorities and 20 program.
limits on residential streets through a 20 miles per hour (mph) zone greater control of street safety. An example policy is to reduce speed legislation that strengthens traffic safety policy and gives El Monte fatalities. Vision Zero for El Monte may pursue local, state, and federal the legal framework around citywide speed limits to reduce traffic speed, as was previously required. This allows agencies to update people walking and bicycling and not based on the 85th percentile Bill 43 (AB 43) allows speed limits to be set based on the presence of As previously mentioned, a new 2021 California state law Assembly lower, where feasible. Cities like Seattle are posting 25 mph speed lim5.2 with Caltrans to make any speed changes within Caltrans right-of-way. radar speed signs and street design changes. El Monte should partner limit reductions should generally be done in conjunction with tools like its on arterial roadways across the City with excellent results. Speed Policy Recommendations
Achieving the City of El Monte’s Vision Zero goals (see Section users, preventing fatalities and serious injuries.
to implement Vision Zero strategies to create safer streets for all road This section details recommendations for the City of El Monte on how

4.2) will
»
policies:
require political will and public support. It is suggested that adopted Exercise local legislative authority;
» Be evidence-based to reduce severe and fatal injuries; and »
toward its Vision Zero goal.

Be high-impact initiatives that will significantly move El Monte providing multiple benefits.

Several of the recommended policies can achieve a variety of goals, after each recommended policy.

Street policies that support these Vision Zero Goals are highlighted and strategies from Chapter 4. Adopted General Plan and Complete are organized by the six Es and correlate with the goals, objectives vulnerable populations is crucial. The following recommended policies save lives; considering community needs and prioritizing the most and implemented with an equity lens to achieve just outcomes and and housing statuses. Vision Zero initiatives must also be developed for people of all incomes, races, ethnicities, languages, ages, abilities, for all road users, all modes of transportation, in all communities and core principle of Vision Zero. The transportation system should be safe In addition, El Monte’s Vision Zero policies should center equity as a Table 5-1 on page 70 summarizes the recommended policies and their corresponding goals.

Proposed Best Practices, Programs, and Policies 05
63 5.2.1 Recommended Policies
El Monte should prioritize traffic calming projects on multi-lane corri to Schools, to Transit and for Seniors
Policy EDU 1: Assess the potential for Safe Routes programs -
and for Senior’s funding, for both education and infrastructure pro with school districts and apply for Safe Routes to Schools, to Transit, transit, and older adult populations. El Monte should build partnerships dors and intersections, especially when in close proximity to schools, -
CD-2.5 Corridor Driveways.

General Plan Policies:
engineering, and educational activities.
these types of activities. Safe Routes funds can be used for planning, SCAG’s Active Transportation Grant Program can provide funding for jects. Grants from OTS, Caltrans’ Active Transportation Program, and Consolidate driveways and access points,
CD-2.6 Pedestrian Design.
streetscape.
and safety of users, and allow for coordinated improvements to the wherever feasible, along commercial corridors to improve traffic flow, Improve pedestrian safety and comfort
PR-5.5 Public Awareness
to facilitate a walkable street environment.
landscape buffers and canopy trees, and other pedestrian amenities along major corridors by incorporating wider sidewalks, appropriate . Raise public awareness of the health benePSF-1.2 School Programs. and the availability of trails, bicycle routes, and greenways. fits of walking and bicycling, the safe use of the streets and sidewalks, Collaborate with El Monte schools to reach
programs for parents, diversion programs, and other assistance. youth through high quality after-school/summer programs, childcare HW-6.4 Bicycle Safety Education. Encourage bicycle safety through education programs targeting bicyclists and motorists and promoHW-4.2 Safer Streets. events.
tional events such as bicycle rodeos and free helmet distribution Reduce the potential for car collisions through
deliver a project with public benefit. Quick-build infrastructure can en projects are crucial to building trust in the government’s ability to For cities that have infrastructure funding constraints, quick-build traffic calming and roadway safety improvements.

Policy EDU 2: Integrate quick-build strategies to expedite pedestrian/vehicle collisions.
on and prioritize improvements for locations with high incidences of the recommendations from the pedestrian safety study. Maintain data design improvements, enforcement, and education efforts. Implement -
essential workplaces. El Monte would benefit greatly by exploring in extended bikeway network, or safer routes to transit, schools, and the community and may include safer crossings, slower streets, and than traditional infrastructure. Mobility needs will vary depending on gage the public better than ever, and be more inclusive and equitable -
HW-8.4 Street Closures for Events.

General Plan Policies:
infrastructure projects to quickly and efficiently meet mobility needs. tegrating quick-build and demonstration policies into new and future Facilitate street closures for
events), and other public events.
farmers’ markets, arts and craft fairs, ciclovías (bicycle and pedestrian

EDUCATION (EDU)
Vision Zero Action Plan
64 routes to their bus stops provide a similar benefit. Compared to chil El Monte residents, transit is their mode of transportation so safe are fun activities that contribute to this minimum threshold. For many significant health benefits. Walking and bicycling to school and parks minimum of 60 minutes of daily physical activity for children to reap The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends a develop safe routes to school, parks and transit programs.

Policy ENC 1: Continue to collaborate with local partners to -
CD-9.5 Streetscapes.

General Plan Policies:

Metro or seek grants to develop these programs.

City can collaborate with the Safe Routes to School Partnership, LA to walk or bicycle to school as an alternative to commuting by car. The routes to schools, parks and transit activities will encourage residents school, and improved fitness and mental alertness. By developing safe activity levels, an increased capacity to learn, fewer absences from of transportation for their school commute have higher daily physical dren who ride to school in a car or bus, students who use active forms Connect residences, schools, parks, and activity
PR-4.2 Connecting People.
and, in appropriate areas, equestrian uses.
centers with streets that accommodate autos, pedestrians, bicyclists, Create green infrastructure along residential streets and arterials that link residents to schools, parks, neighborPR-5.1 Sidewalks. hoods, the downtown, and other destinations.

Create a network of paths and sidewalks that are
safe and accessible to all people, with pedestrian amenities that connect residences to schools, parks, shopping, and public facilities.

PR-5.2 Bicycle Paths. Create a bicycle path network that is consistent with the Circulation Element, and Emerald Necklace Vision, and supC-3.4 Safe Routes to Schools ports the MTA bicycle hub concept.
. Work with school districts to identify
C-4.5 Improved Bus Transit Amenities.
schools during the morning and afternoon peak hours.
and pedestrians. Support safe drop-off and pick-up zones around safe routes to all schools, enabling better school access by cyclists Improve amenities at bus
HW-5.5 Pedestrian Improvements.
as appropriate.
protection, seats, transit information, bus shelters, landscaping, etc., stops, including attractive and convenient stops with shade/weather Prioritize improvements to sideHW-7.2 Safe Routes to School. around schools and parks.
walks and the pedestrian environment in the Downtown and areas Create a Safe Routes to School plan in
HW-7.4 Walking/Bus/Bike Programs.

Routes to School plan.
concerns. Actively seek State and Federal funding to support the Safe all El Monte schools. Prioritize improvements with the highest safety Encourage the creation of
HW-7.5 School Collaboration.
and make it safer to do so.
other programs that encourage children to walk or bicycle to school “Walking School Bus,” “Biking School Bus,” “Bicycle Trains,” contests and Work collaboratively with the school
Community Services Department at the City level.
that includes members of these groups and the Parks, Recreation & address school access and safety issues. Form a school watch board district, school board, PTA, and community residents to identify and

ENCOURAGEMENT (ENC)
Proposed Best Practices, Programs, and Policies 05
65 has been profoundly influenced by infrastructure. With its many neigh their environment. Traversed by major highways, El Monte’s identity El Monte’s streets are vital to the way its people view and interact with amenities in future roadway designs.

Policy ENC 2: Integrate human-centered placemaking
-
captures and filters stormwater. Finally, the provide aesthetic and so reduces the heat reflected from pavement and infrastructure that and stormwater catchment areas can create a shade canopy that structures and lighting. Integrating green infrastructure such as trees should be considered such as adding parkways, trees, benches, shade walking and bicycling. When re-designing roadways, the human scale also have the pedestrian and bicycle scale amenities to encourage safely to schools, parks, transit and other neighborhood amenities but are of great importance. Residents must be able to walk easily and borhoods, districts, and commercial centers, multimodal connections -
CD-1.2 Gateways and Signs.

General Plan Policies:
and enhancement of property values.
cial benefits such as beautification, safety, areas or social interaction Continue the City’s gateway monument
CD-1.5 Streetscapes.
heighten the sense of arrival to the community.
and sign program at primary and secondary entrances to El Monte to Develop unifying streetscape plans for major
corridors and subdistricts that include specialized streetlights, landCD-1.6 Public Art. scaping, a community forest, signage, and street furniture.

Throughout the community, incorporate a diversity
of public art in residential, commercial, and public areas that celeCD-1.7 Identity. brates the multiple cultures and influences in El Monte.

Support the creation of highly differentiated identities for residential, commercial, and industrial areas that support the eclectic physical environment of the community.

CD-2.2 Streetscape Design. Incorporate unifying and consistent CD-2.8 Landscaping.
and quality and appropriately scaled signage.
regularly spaced street trees, distinctive street lighting and furniture, elements for major arterials—landscaped parkways and medians, Beautify corridors through specialized landscape
CD-3.5 Corridor Themes.
along roadways.
incorporation of street trees of sufficient size, canopy, and diversity palettes tailored to different roadway configurations. Require the Adopt landscape themes for major corridors
CR-2.4 Public Spaces
major corridor, soften hardscape, and reinforce the City’s image. that give special identity to the role, function, and history of each . Assess the feasibility of creating distinctive
Monte.
a central gathering place and an interpretive map of the history of El public space and walking routes in each district and Citywide, with Vision Zero Action Plan
66 announcements can be posted through the City’s and Police Depart on bicycle and pedestrian related violations. In addition, public service Extra enforcement along the high-injury corridors and areas focused specific information targeted at motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

Mayor’s Office to distribute educational materials to violators, with The City of El Monte should work with the Police Department and to develop traffic safety campaigns.

Policy ENF 1: Partner with the El Monte Police Department -
PSF-1.5 Traffic Safety.

General Plan Policies:
outlets to spread the message.
press conferences highlighting safety initiatives, using the Citys’ media and local advocacy organizations can develop press releases and hold Works in collaboration with the Mayor’s office, Police Department, ments websites and social media platforms. The Department of Public Continue, evaluate, and improve the City’s
PSF-1.6 Neighborhood Programs.
prevention, and safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. traffic safety program, focusing on traffic law enforcement, accident Continue to support, promote, and
HW-4.2 Safer Streets
crime-prevention programs.
improve the City’s neighborhood improvement, citizen volunteer, and . Reduce the potential for car collisions through
pedestrian/vehicle collisions.
on and prioritize improvements for locations with high incidences of the recommendations from the pedestrian safety study. Maintain data design improvements, enforcement, and education efforts. Implement Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and the Active Trans across Southern California have successfully obtained funds from the and reallocating roadway space to non-motorized road users. Cities lanes in order to reduce speeding, adding digital speed readout signs, can be as simple as restriping existing travel lanes to narrower travel is where high-severity crashes tend to occur. Generally, traffic calming land use. In general, multi-lane roadways along commercial land use of concern based on data analysis of roadway characteristics and Traffic calming should be deployed on the corridors and intersections most frequently.
proactively where high-severity crashes are likely to occur Policy ENG 1: Introduce traffic calming measures
-
C-3.1 Operational Efficiency.

General Plan Policies:
portation Program for Vision Zero improvements.

Maximize the operational efficiency of
the arterial roadway system with the implementation of traffic manPHS-4.5 Traffic Safety. impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.
agement and traffic signal operations measures without adversely Improve traffic safety on City streets through
PHS-4.6 Traffic Safety Committee.
vehicles while under the influence of substances.
critical intersections, and more frequent sweeps for drivers operating the use of advanced technology, signal timing, remote sensoring at Enhance the role and memberHW-4.2 Safer Streets
reduce the incidence of accidents for all transportation modes. neighborhood groups to facilitate innovative and proven solutions to ship of the Traffic Safety Committee to include public, private, and . Reduce the potential for car collisions through
pedestrian/vehicle collisions.
on and prioritize improvements for locations with high incidences of the recommendations from the pedestrian safety study. Maintain data design improvements, enforcement, and education efforts. Implement

ENFORCEMENT (ENF) ENGINEERING (ENG)
Proposed Best Practices, Programs, and Policies 05
67 HW-4.3 Traffic Calming. Implement a traffic-calming program to reduce traffic speeds and encourage safe driving practices in neighHW-6.1 Bicycle Network. borhoods and high-volume pedestrian areas throughout the City.

Increase the number of multi-use trails and
HW-7.3 Traffic Calming.
priority streets, and secure bicycle parking throughout the City. create a network of striped bicycle lanes, signed bicycle routes, bicycle Implement traffic calming strategies in areas
of all roadway users including bicyclists, children, persons with disa increased use of these modes of transportation to meet the needs routes for walking, bicycling, and public transportation that encourage Streets policy in 2014 to provide safe, convenient, and comfortable To ensure the safety of all road users, El Monte has adopted a Complete Policies
Policy ENG 2: Continue to implement Complete Street
immediately around schools and parks.
-
National Association of City Transportation Officials’ (NACTO) resourc motorists and movers of commercial goods. Continue to reference the continuing to maintain a safe and effective transportation system for bilities, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors, while -
es outlining multimodal street designs. Caltrans also has several mul1.

Complete Street Policies include:
that could also be officially adopted by the City of El Monte. timodal guidelines including a “Complete Streets Elements Toolbox” streets in El Monte while remaining flexible to the unique circum construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified Urban Street Design Guide) to guide the planning, funding, design, Adopt new Complete Streets Design Guidelines (such as NACTO’s -
judgment will produce context sensitive designs.
stances of different streets where sound engineering and planning

2. all City plans, manuals, rules, regulations, and programs as appro Incorporate the Complete Streets Design Guidelines’ principles into -
priate.

3. pathways, and perpendicular curb ramps, among others. bulb-outs, curb extensions, sidewalks, buffer zones, shared-use forms, including but not limited to traffic signals, roundabouts, and crossings. Pedestrian accommodations can take numerous Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodations on all streets

4. low auto volume streets, traffic calming, signs, and pavement mark not limited to the use of bicycle boulevards, striping, slow streets, Bicycle accommodations can take numerous forms, including but Provide well-designed bicycle accommodations along all streets. -
ings, among others.

5. relocated.
planted wherever a street is newly constructed, reconstructed, or Where physical activity conditions warrant, landscaping shall be C-2.7 Maintain Infrastructure.

General Plan Policies:
prioritize funding for projects that advance Vision Zero goals. users should be reexamined. The City may pursue adopting a policy to projects that do not include safety components for vulnerable road likely to occur based on roadway characteristics and land use. CIP intersections where data show the highest number of crashes are Projects that improve vulnerable road user safety at corridors and the Capital Improvement Plan.

Policy ENG 3: Prioritize funding for Vision Zero projects in Develop and maintain adequate fundED-1. 5 Funding.
and upkeep of City transportation.
ing sources and maintenance programs for the ongoing maintenance Explore, develop, and use alternative funding sources
PSF-1.8 Funding.
for which the City lacks sufficient resources.
to pay for and provide incentives for economic development activities Seek to raise additional funds for police services
HW-7.1 Transportation Investments.
taxes, and other means to allow for permanent revenue sources. outside of general fund revenues through special assessments, fees, Prioritize transportation investschools, and childcare centers. ments to increase safety around parks, open spaces, schools, pre- Vision Zero Action Plan
68 C-2.6 Roadway Sizing.

General Plan Policies:
are reasons for Assembly Bill 43.
other road users. The desire to protect public safety for all road users not adequately take into consideration the risk this choice imposes on death in exchange for a shorter trip time. This driver’s decision may drive faster, accepting a higher probability of a collision, injury, or even especially vulnerable road users. For example, a driver may decide to regulating speed is the significant risks drivers can impose on others, network and other problematic city roads. The primary reason for which will provide guidance on reducing speeds along the high-injury El Monte should explore developing a Speed Management Plan vehicle speeds on the high-injury network
Policy ENG 4: Develop a Speed Management Plan to reduce Provide appropriate roadway sizing in the City.

Where roads are wider than traffic requires, consider converting surC-3.1 Operational Efficiency. to make the road more pedestrian and bicycle friendly.
plus space to landscaped medians, bicycle lanes, and wider sidewalks, Maximize the operational efficiency of
the arterial roadway system with the implementation of traffic manHW-4.3 Traffic Calming. impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.
agement and traffic signal operations measures without adversely Implement a traffic-calming program to
reduce traffic speeds and encourage safe driving practices in neighborhoods and high-volume pedestrian areas throughout the City. control for setting speed limits without determining the 85th percen The City should take advantage of the new state law allowing local the road can help the City of El Monte achieve its Vision Zero goals. speed enforcement, improved driver education, and bicycle rules of Statewide discussions over setting speed limits, equitable automated pedestrian and bicyclists’ safety and state levels.

Policy EQU 1: Participate in policy reform efforts to support -
C-3.3 Neighborhood Traffic.

General Plan Policies:
tile speed first.

Work with community representatives,
C-6.2 New and Substantially Rehabilitated Development.
unique to neighborhoods or districts.
strategies to address traffic, congestion, and transportation issues neighborhood groups, businesses, and residents to develop creative Require
HW-14.1 Greater Participation.
networks where appropriate.
pedestrians and to provide connections to the bicycle and pedestrian new development to provide amenities for transit, bicyclists, and Invite and encourage individuals,
HW-14.2 Regular Updates.
decision-making process.
youth, businesses and organizations in El Monte to participate in the Regularly update the community about
HW-14.4 Social Cohesion.
activities.
the progress of the General Plan implementation and health-related Encourage activities such as block parties
social cohesion and the overall identity of the City.
and community-wide social events, that strengthen neighborhood

EQUITY (EQU)
Proposed Best Practices, Programs, and Policies 05
69 »
performance measures, such as but not limited to:
project or program. Implementation monitoring guidance can include will be dependent on the data that can be collected as part of the Developing a program to track implemented projects and programs evaluate infrastructure and program improvements.

Policy EVA 1: Develop a program to track, monitor and
Miles and types of safety improvements built each fiscal year; » Number of annual crashes by type on City roads per fiscal year; » Reduction of collisions along the high-injury network » Number of sidewalk and crosswalk enhancements implemented; »
and attendance at each event; and
Number of events (including education and encouragement) held »
and dollar amount of grants successfully won.

Number of state and regional active transportation grants pursued, provide baseline information. These datasets are often readily avail after bicycle and pedestrian counts and collisions can be collected to When designing and implementing infrastructure projects, before and -
Inductive bike loops can feed information to count stations. Perma Counts can be collected manually or through automated counters. monitoring trends of a facility or network.
data provide the foundation for measuring nonmotorized travel and the City’s progress in meeting Vision Zero goals. Count, or volume, Collecting, monitoring, and evaluating this data can be fruitful to show able or can be integrated into the project budget at a minimal cost. -
and space throughout a network. The City can use this data to set permanent continuous counts describe how travel varies over time and bicycling across the city. When used together, short duration and supplementing that data, as well as showing variations in walking counts can give more granular information than automated counters, time as well as for calibrating manual counts. Short duration manual nent automated counters are essential to understand changes over performance measures, encourage alternative modes, manage transGuide grant funding. The Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Monitoring trends of people walking and bicycling and be more competitive for portation operations efficiently and effectively, evaluate the long-term 1 includes a review of existing techniques and guidance for imED-1.7 Performance Measurement.

General Plan Policies:
plementing traffic monitoring programs.

Establish objective measures of
economic development, identify performance benchmarks and tarHW-4.12 Measurement. needed to improve performance.
gets, constantly measure performance, and adjust programs where Regularly understand the number of people
walking, bicycling, and taking public transportation by using a standEl Monte should annually collect and analyze the most common caus behaviors contributing to crashes
Policy EVA 2: Acquire data to determine most unsafe
ardized monitoring tool and distribute the findings to the community. -
measures, engage the local police department to implement educa es for collisions, and after implementing appropriate traffic calming -
HW-4.2 Safer Streets.

General Plan Policies:
while under the influence (DUI) as an effective way to reduce fatalities. continue screening with checkpoints to detect individuals driving education and enforcement initiatives. The Police Department should funding from California’s Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to support tion and enforcement to encourage safe driving. Continue to pursue Reduce the potential for car collisions through
pedestrian/vehicle collisions.
on and prioritize improvements for locations with high incidences of the recommendations from the pedestrian safety study. Maintain data design improvements, enforcement, and education efforts. Implement

EVALUATION (EVA)
Vision Zero Action Plan
70 RECOMMENDED POLICIES
EDUCATION ENCOURAGEMENT ENFORCEMENT ENGINEERING EQUITY EVALUATION EDU 1.

ENHANCE
SAFETY

PROGRAMS

EDUCATION

FOR ALL

ABILITIES

AGES AND
EDU 2.

EMPLOY

QUICK-BUILD

BICYCLE

AND SAFETY

PROJECTS
ENC 1. PROSAFE AND

VIDE FOR
COMFORTPARKS AND

SCHOOLS,

ROUTES TO

ABLE SAFE

TRANSIT
ENC 2. DEPROMOTE

SIGN AND
HUMAN-CENTERED

STREETS
ENF 1. PARTNER WITH
THE EL MONTE POLICE

DEPARTMENT
TO FOCUSING ON TRAFENFORCE

FIC SAFETY
-

MENT AND
EDUCATIONCAMPAIGNS

AL SAFETY
ENG 1.

IMPROVE
INFRASTRUCTURE TO

ROADWAY

INCREASE

SAFETY FOR

ALL USERS
ENG 2. LOWER VEHICLE
SPEEDS
EQU 1. PRIORSAFETY IN

ITIZE ROAD
-

VESTMENTS

THROUGH AN

EQUITABLE
LENS
EVA 1.

AND EVAL

MONITOR

ANNUALLY
-

SUCCESS

UATE THE
OF INVESTMENTS IN
FOR VULNERABLE ROADWAY USERS
Seniors
Schools, to Transit and for
for Safe Routes programs to
EDU 1: Assess the potential

X X X X X X X X
improvements.
calming and roadway safety
strategies to expedite traffic
EDU 2: Integrate quick-build

X X X X X X X X
programs.
to school, parks and transit
partners to develop safe routes
ENC 1: Collaborate with local

X X X X X X X
designs.
amenities in future roadway
centered placemaking
ENC 2: Integrate humanX X X X X X
traffic safety campaigns.

Police Department to develop
ENF 1: Partner with the El Monte

X X X X X
to occur most frequently.
high-severity crashes are likely
measures proactively where
ENG 1: Introduce traffic calming

X X X X X X X
Complete Street Policies
ENG 2: Continue to implement X X X X X X X
Capital Improvement Plan.

Vision Zero projects in the
ENG 3: Prioritize funding for

X X X X X X X X X
Table 5-1: Goals and Policy Matrix
Proposed Best Practices, Programs, and Policies 05
71 RECOMMENDED POLICIES
EDUCATION ENCOURAGEMENT ENFORCEMENT ENGINEERING EQUITY EVALUATION EDU 1.

ENHANCE
SAFETY

PROGRAMS

EDUCATION

FOR ALL

ABILITIES

AGES AND
EDU 2.

EMPLOY

QUICK-BUILD

BICYCLE

AND SAFETY

PROJECTS
ENC 1. PROSAFE AND

VIDE FOR
COMFORTPARKS AND

SCHOOLS,

ROUTES TO

ABLE SAFE

TRANSIT
ENC 2. DEPROMOTE

SIGN AND
HUMAN-CENTERED

STREETS
ENF 1. PARTNER WITH
THE EL MONTE POLICE

DEPARTMENT
TO FOCUSING ON TRAFENFORCE

FIC SAFETY
-

MENT AND
EDUCATIONCAMPAIGNS

AL SAFETY
ENG 1.

IMPROVE
INFRASTRUCTURE TO

ROADWAY

INCREASE

SAFETY FOR

ALL USERS
ENG 2. LOWER VEHICLE
SPEEDS
EQU 1. PRIORSAFETY IN

ITIZE ROAD
-

VESTMENTS

THROUGH AN

EQUITABLE
LENS
EVA 1.

AND EVAL

MONITOR

ANNUALLY
-

SUCCESS

UATE THE
OF INVESTMENTS IN
FOR VULNERABLE ROADWAY USERS
injury network
vehicle speeds on the highManagement Plan to reduce
ENG 4: Develop a Speed

X X X X X X X
the state levels.
for people walking and biking at
reform efforts to support safety
EQU 1: Participate in policy

X X X X X X X
improvements.
infrastructure and program
track, monitor and evaluate
EVA 1: Develop a program to

X X X X X X X
crashes.
behaviors contributing to
determine most dangerous
EVA 2: Acquire data to

X X X X X X X
Vision Zero Action Plan
72 Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Monitoring Guide. 1 Endnote
https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/tmguide/
06 Implementation
Vision Zero Action Plan
74 6.1 Recommendations and
This chapter focuses on the key outcomes of the report: the recom Implementation Overview
-
in El Monte. Section
mendations and initial project implementation to support Vision Zero

6.2 of this chapter delves into the systemic recimplementation of Vision Zero in El Monte.

Finally, section 6.5 includes metrics to be used to measure progress of Section 6.4 delves further into funding opportunities for Vision Zero. are intended to be used to pursue grant funding for implementation. be implemented at each location. The callouts on the aerial photos that show initial project recommendations and what measures should includes the specific corridor designs and corresponding cut sheets likely going to occur, especially high-severity collisions. Section 6.3 should be proactively implemented at locations where collisions are at key locations where collisions have already occurred. Rather, they of Vision Zero is that countermeasures shouldn’t just be implemented ommendations that are network-wide across El Monte. A key concept

6.2 Prioritized Systemic Infrastructure
Enforcement, Equity, and Evaluation countermeasures. The implemen Monte involves a joint effort of Engineering, Education, Evaluation, Treatments and recommendations to implement Vision Zero in El Recommendations
-
These countermeasures may also benefit the City as some may be con accelerate the achievement of local, state, and national safety goals. tation of proven safety countermeasures is strongly encouraged to -
characteristics correlated with specific severe collision types. The ap implemented improvements based on high-risk roadway features and a systemic fashion. A systemic approach to traffic safety involves widely in implementing Vision Zero is to apply measures across the network, in toward a goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries by 2027. One precept focus to reduce serious and fatal collisions in the near term and work The implementation plan in this section represents the recommended applications.
sidered innovative for the region and garner additional points for grant -
little extra cost. This section describes the systemic engineering recom proach helps cities and agencies broaden their traffic safety efforts at -
Engineering improvements such as marked crosswalks, separated bicy mendations for this Vision Zero plan.
-
road users. Data-driven, evidence-based engineering projects will im cle lanes, or innovative signalization practices will improve safety for all -
safety enhancements may include leading pedestrian intervals, pro road users, especially the City’s most vulnerable. Data-driven pedestrian prove the safety of the built environment to create livable streets for all -
are shown in
The systemic engineering recommendations for this Vision Zero plan Corridors in El Monte.
and no right turns on red, as shown in the cut-sheets for the High-Injury tected turn phases, elimination of dual turn lanes, signal improvements, Table 6-1.

Implementation 06
75 Table 6-1: Potential Countermeasures to Improve Safety and Concept Costs

COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM INTERSECTION MID-BLOCK OR INFLUENCE Gateway Treatments
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Street Spanning Structure $115,000 EA X X
Gateway Treatments Large Sign $35,000 EA X X
Modern Roundabout Concrete curbs, truck aprons, landscape $500,000 EA X Traffic Calming Circle Pavement markings and 'buttons' $33,000 EA X Hardened Centerlines Raised rubber centerline $2,500 EA X Curb Ramp Concrete curbs, sidewalk, yellow ramp $7,000 EA Corner Radius Reduction or Truck Apron Concrete curbs and sidewalk $15,000 EA X Concrete Sidewalk Concrete curb and sidewalk $410 LF X
Raised Crosswalk or Speed Table Speed table $30,000 EA X X Pedestrian Refuge Island (FHWA or Portland style) Concrete curbs and landscaping $37,000 EA X Crossing Island Concrete curbs and sign(s) $20,000 EA X X Bulb Out / Curb Extensions Concrete curbs and landscaping $37,000 EA X X Bulb Out / Turn Wedge Pavement markings with 'buttons' $2,500 EA X Chicanes / Roadway Curvature Concrete curbs and landscaping $22,000 EA X Chicanes / Roadway Curvature Pavement markings and 'buttons' $2,500 EA X High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA X X Bicycle lanes One stripe both sides of road $10 LF X
Bicycle vs Vehicle Conflict Markings Green w/ white edges, 50 FT length $6,000 EA X Buffered Bicycle lanes (cycle tracks) 2 FT buffer, crosshatch (both side of road) $25 LF X Road Diets and Lane Width Reductions 6 lane stripes for 5 lanes $30 LF X Advisory Bicycle Lanes Bicycle lane stripes both sides of road $10 LF X Bicycle Priority Lanes Bicycle lane stripes both sides of road $20 LF X Left Turn Lane Pavement marking for added vehicle lane $2,500 EA X Parking Restricted at Crossings / Daylighting Pavement marking and 'buttons' $2,500 EA X Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Added to existing signal structure $2,000 EA X
Pedestrian Detector (w/ regular maintenance) Added to existing signal structure $1,500 INT X Pedestrian Signal - Upgrades Added to existing signal structure $1,200 EA X Pedestrian Signal - New Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA X Flashing Yellow Arrows, if signal timing not changed Signal head replacement, signal timing mods. $7,900 INT X Add NoRTOR sign / display Sign attached to existing signal structure $500 EA X Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on trailer $16,000 EA X Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA X Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) Single post with signs and lights (solar) $25,000 EA X Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHB) Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA X Reflective border on signal heads 8 signal heads $2,400 INT X Street Lighting Fixture and power lines as needed $8,000 EA X X Target Speeds and School Speed Zones Speed limit signs. $800 EA X Left Turn Lane, Protected Left Turn Phase mods.

Signal Timing Adjustments
Signal timing modification $1,500 INT X
Signal Changes at Intersections Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT X Leading Pedestrian Intervals Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,000 INT X Change Signal Timing to Protected Phases Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT X Coordinate signals to manage speeds, calm traffic Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $10,000 INT X Reduce cycle, queue, and pedestrian delay Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT X Cost data sources: https://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/downloads/Countermeasure%20Costs_Report_Nov2013.pdf Notes: Unit Costs are escalated from original cost year to potential construction year of 2022, INT=Intersection, LF=Linear Feet, EA=Each, FT=Feet http://katana.hsrc.unc.edu/cms/downloads/Costs-for-Pedestrian-Bicycle-Infrastructure-Improvements.xlsx Vision Zero Action Plan
76 Figure 6-1: Sample Modification to La Madera Ave and Lower Azusa Rd Intersection
La Madera Avenue
Lower Azusa Road

RIGHT TURN ONLY
Median Planter
Install Raised

RIGHT TURN ONLY
points at the intersection is reduced from 32 to 16. RCIs are cost-effecfrom both the left and the right, as opposed to just one side. A com when motorists have to turn left and be vigilant about other motorists One of the most unsafe conflicts for people walking and bicycling is RCIs have significant safety benefits for people walking and bicycling. points, plus reduce the auto-vulnerable road user conflict points. simplify driver decisions, and reduce the number of auto-auto conflict tive measures that reduce the number of turning and angle collisions, -
through movements for motorists on the minor road, thereby dramati motorist travels left or through. The RCI eliminates left movements and direction of the person walking or bicycling and a crash occurs as the mon collision that occurs is the motorist’s attention is in the opposite -
There are many places in El Monte where implementing an RCI is ap cally increasing safety for non-motorized road users.
-
Figure 6-1
the intersection of Lower Azusa Road at La Madera Avenue, as shown in propriate, but the first place this Plan recommends is to place one at . An example of a constructed RCI is shown in Figure 6-2. Based the minor road and left turns from the major road, as seen in Rd in El Monte a median island that restricts both through movement of nearby cities. There is, however, at the intersection of Asher St and Peck on research of the region, there appear to be no RCIs in El Monte or Figure 6-3.

Table 6-1 is a summary of countermeasures that are proven in reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries. El Monte is an excellent candiEl Monte’s geographic layout has shown it to have an excellent trans date for grants, both due to its demographics and its geographic layout. -
throughout El Monte. There are relatively few signalized crossings be on major roadways, which are nearly ubiquitous on multi-lane roadways make in the City of El Monte is two-way stop-controlled intersections a few improvements. One of the most important improvements to portation grid network. It is a good city that could be a great city with -
Flashing Beacon, the Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon, and traditional pedes pedestrian-specific beacons and signals such as the Rectangular Rapid tween major intersections in the City. That is, there are relatively few -
In an RCI, side-street (minor cross street) traffic is prohibited from turn points of conflicts, ease traffic movements, and enhance traffic safety.

A RCI is a non-traditional intersection that can reduce the number of Restricted Crossing Intersection (RCI).
multiple directions. One solution is to implement what is known as a conflict points and judge gaps with high-speed on-coming traffic from roadways pose a special challenge for motorists trying to navigate 32 trian signals. Moreover, two-way stop-controlled intersections on major -
and triple right turns can be made with the same effect. There are var given that often U-turns can be made at the first signalized intersection El Monte, and U-Turns are not required for the subsequent intersection, Crossing U-Turn (RCUT.) The RCI is more common in urban areas, such as There is a nuanced difference between the RCI and the Restricted motorists on the minor street are only allowed to turn right. ing left or traveling straight through the mainline intersection. Instead, -
collisions. The safety benefit of the RCI is that the number of conflict thereby limiting collision opportunities and, typically, the severity of such movement of traffic, RCIs reduce the total number of conflict points, RCIs have many benefits. In addition to allowing for a more efficient a legal U-turn at a nearby crossover.
motorists will turn right onto the main road from the minor road and do The RCUT, by contrast, tend to be in rural areas. To navigate the RCUT, ious options to keep connectivity and accessibility to all destinations.

Implementation 06
77 1.

Pedestrian Friendly Signal Timing Options
Coordinate signals to manage speeds and calm traffic.

2. Add 5-7 second Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI).

3. Add countdown signals to all traffic signals, starting with high priority walking locations.

4. or children.

Walk” (FDW) at signals with high numbers of disabled, older adults, Increase the Pedestrian Clearance Interval aka “Flashing Don’t

5. Consider Right-Turn-On-Red (RTOR) restrictions at signalized intersections when warranted by pedestrian volumes.

6. shorten queue lengths.

Consider shorter cycle lengths to reduce pedestrian delay and

7. crossings.

Consider implementing pedestrian recall at high pedestrian volume

8. Any left turn phasing should be protected phasing.

9. in each direction.

Consider Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) if the street has only one lane

10. Add yellow backplates to traffic signal head.

6.2.1 Signalization Principles
on the observed volumes of queued traffic, and in a auto-only trans mph from the previous intersection. Signal timing is based primarily movement, with each timed to be encountered by a auto traveling 30 given for through-traffic and 15 seconds can be given for a left-turn through movements (i.e turn green). For instance, 30 seconds can be and the “speed” at which subsequent signals along a corridor allow Timing is the amount of time spent on a given traffic movement, Traffic signalization encompasses two concepts: timing and phasing. -
movements have been completed.
turns being paired. A “cycle” of phasing is completed when all turning turning movements, such as through-movements and protected leftfor all movements per phase. Signal phasing refers to the pairing of portation environment, efficient signal timing aims to clear the queue Figure 6-2: Superstreet example in San Diego at El Cajon Blvd/ Idaho St Figure 6-3: Example of Median Island Restricting Movements at Asher St and Peck Rd in El Monte
Vision Zero Action Plan
78 Signalization Principles
Shorten Signal Cycles
to Increase Turnover
Prioritize Walking,
Bicycling, and Transit
Keep the Number of
Signal Phases to a
Minimum
Time Signals to the
Speed you Intend
Traffic to Go
and Off-Peak Volumes
Adjust Timing for Peak Use FixedTime
Signals as Opposed to
Actuated Signals
Together, signal timing and phasing reflect the priorities of a transporSignal cycles of 60 to 90 seconds are ideal for urban areas with fre Shorten Signal Cycles
multiple modes at intersections through signal timing and phasing. bicyclists, and transit vehicles. Here are ways to balance the needs of for vehicles at intersections need to be balanced with pedestrians, tation network. In a multimodal transportation environment, signals -
quent intersections and multimodal traffic and. Short signal cycles reto maintain safe travel speeds and discourage speeding.

Synchronize green lights along a corridor at or below the target speed Time Signals at the Speed Intended for Traffic
turns on red lights.
unsafe road or driving conditions with protected left turns or no right appropriate to the volume of turning movements while addressing lengthen the signal cycle. The number of signal phases should be as in the case of protected left turns, independent signal phases also While increasing the number signal phases can increase safety, such Minimize Number of Signal Phases
part of a coordinated signal timing plan.
control the speed of traffic along a corridor, and can reduce speeds as duce overall pedestrian wait times and side street delay. Cycle lengths pedestrians more visible to vehicles. Pedestrians are given several sec Leading pedestrian intervals increase pedestrian safety by making Prioritize Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and Transit
-
can also be given a “pedestrian scramble” if the signals hold auto traf for autos turning left onto the pedestrian’s cross street. Pedestrians onds head-start to cross, putting them further into the line-of-sight -
and diagonal across the intersection. Synchronizing signals for bicy fic in all directions and pedestrians are given crosswalks perpendicular -
vehicles are not on schedule. The Los Angeles Metro’s Bus Rapid Tran communications from transit vehicles to signals for instances where priority can operate in the same way, and can also include wireless traveling at a certain speed will experience green lights. Transit signal cles combines timing and phasing along a corridor so that bicyclists -
ensure some consistency in crossing opportunities, though fixed tim activation also can be used in conjunction with actuated signals to for pedestrians to cross, decreasing walking times. Pedestrian signal timing is preferred in urban areas to ensure consistent opportunities autos. This can decrease opportunities for pedestrians. Fixed signal Actuated signals detect vehicles and prioritize turning movements for Use Fixed Signal Timing Rather than Actuated Signals
reliable, and convenient bus service throughout Los Angeles County. sit (BRT) utilizes traffic-signal priority (TSP) which helps provide fast, -
ing is preferred.

Implementation 06
79 Figure 6-4: Recommended Vision Zero Project Locations Lower Azusa Road between Elrovia Avenue and Peck Road
Santa Anita Avenue between Ranchito Street and McGirk Avenue Tyler Avenue between Ramona Boulevard and Valley Boulevard Peck Road between Ranchito Street and Lower Azusa Road
Magnolia Street between Allgeyer Avenue and Durfee Avenue Ramona Boulevard between Ferris Road and La Madera Avenue Valley Boulevard between Ramona Boulevard and North Peck Road Garvey Avenue between Central Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue Bryant Road between Tyler Avenue and Cypress Avenue
Durfee Avenue between Magnolia Street and Denholm Drive The Top 10 Recommended Projects include:

6.3 Concept Designs (Cutsheets)
citywide, as well as more permanent and higher-cost solutions. Con low-cost “tactical urbanism” improvements that can be implemented are key to the implementation of safety improvements; they identify TAC as shown in Figure 6-3. The cutsheets for these ten locations segments of corridors identified by the high-injury network and the Ten conceptual designs were developed for the highest-ranking -
work. Higher-cost projects could be required to be part of the capital be integrated into planned construction such as resurfacing or utility struction of some of these improvements, like bicycle facilities, can improvement process to identify funding, undergo public and environsame goals of the original recommendations. goes “where” - final design of these projects should still achieve the these recommendations are conceptual in nature - identifying “what” and refined with input from City staff and El Monte residents. Though The recommendations were developed based on field observations provided for low-cost projects and permanent installations. mental review, and plan preparation. Planning-level cost estimates are J
I
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
B
C
D E
F
G
H
I
J
Santa Anita Ave
Bryant Rd
Tyler Ave
Merced
Ave
Garvey Ave
Durfee Ave
Parkway Dr
Vision Zero Action Plan
80 Pedestrian Signal High Visibility Crosswalks Low Cost Bulb Outs Crossing Island 3 5
Conflict Striping
2 4 1
4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4 4 3
5 3 3
3 3
3 2 2 1
A
Figure 6-5: Durfee Avenue Project Sheet: Between Magnolia Street and Denholm Drive

6.3.1 Durfee Avenue
high speeds and lack of signalized crossing make for an unfriendly environ southeast part of the City of El Monte. The primary land use is commercial, the Durfee Avenue between Magnolia Street and Denholm Drive is located in the -
for students to cross the street to access Mountain View High School is need ment for people walking and bicycling, as well a,s for people driving. Demand -
Figure 6-5
ed, making the roadway the ideal candidate for Vision Zero improvements. provides concept level improvements with numbered callouts and is shown in
corresponding sample pictures below the map. A concept level cost estimate Table 6-2.
2 2
2 2 2 2
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
81 Pedestrian crossing mid-block on Durfee Avenue at Legore Elementary School Existing bicycle lane on Durfee Avenue Table 6-2: Durfee Avenue Countermeasure Concept Costs

COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Crossing Island
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Concrete curbs and sign(s) $20,000 EA 1 $20,000
Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
turn wedges
Pavement markings with 'buttons' and rubber $2,500 EA 9 $22,500 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 6 $33,000 Bicycle vs Vehicle Conflict Markings Green w/ white edges, 50 ft length $6,000 EA 8 $48,000 Pedestrian Signal - New
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA 2 $396,000 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $519,500 Vision Zero Action Plan
82 Curb Extensions Advisory Bicycle Lane Low Cost-Bulb-Out Speed Feedback Signs Speed Cushions B
Figure 6-6: Bryant Road Project Sheet: Between Tyler Avenue and Cypress Avenue 3 2 1 4 5

6.3.2 Bryant Road
more traffic calming to increase connectivity and safety for all modes of transpor residential area on the south side. Although it is a relatively small street, it could use part of the City of El Monte. Legore Elementary School is on the north side and a Bryant Road between Tyler Avenue and Cypress Avenue is located in the central -
tation that travel along and across this roadway. Figure 6-6 provides concept level the map. A concept level cost estimate is shown in
improvements with numbered callouts and corresponding sample pictures below Table 6-4.
3 3
3 1
1 3 5
4 5
5 5
1 1
4 2
3 1
1 1
3 1 (2009-2020)
Implementation 06
83 Existing roadway conditions on Bryant Road Existing high-visibility crosswalks near Legore Elementary School

COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Speed Cushions
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Asphalt paving $7,000 EA 4 $28,000
Bulb Out / Curb Extensions Concrete curbs and landscaping $37,000 EA 6 $222,000 Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
and rubber turn wedges
Pavement markings with 'buttons' $2,500 EA 8 $20,000
Advisory Bicycle Lanes
Pavement Markings
road
Bicycle lane stripes both sides of $10 LF 1 1,500 $15,000 Electronic Feedback Signs
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 2 $16,000
INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $301,000 Table 6-4: Bryant Road Countermeasure Concept Costs
Vision Zero Action Plan
84 Pedestrian Signal Bicycle Priority Lane Low-Cost Bulb-Outs Hardened Centerlines Interval
Leading Pedestrian
Speed Bumps
Hardened Centerline
4 3
3 5
5 5
5 5 5
5 5
5 2
2 2
2 7
7 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
6 6
C
Figure 6-7: Garvey Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Central Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue Conflict Striping
3 2 1 4 5 6 7

6.3.3 Garvey Boulevard
opportunities for Vision Zero treatments.
obstacles for people walking and bicycling, challenges for people driving, and the street. The high motor vehicle speeds and lack of bicycle facilities create residential, with several restaurants and other commercial establishments on in the southern part of the City of El Monte. It is a mix of commercial and Garvey Avenue between Central Avenue and Santa Anita Avenue is located Figure 6-7 provides concept level
below the map. A concept level cost estimate is shown in improvements with numbered callouts and corresponding sample pictures Table 6-5.
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
85 Existing roadway conditions along Garvey Boulevard Current traffic volumes along Garvey Boulevard

COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Hardened Centerlines
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Raised rubber centerline $2,500 EA 8 $20,000
Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
wedges
Pavement markings with 'buttons' and rubber turn $2,500 EA 4 $10,000 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 8 $44,000 Bicycle vs Vehicle Conflict Markings Green w/ white edges, 50 ft length $6,000 EA 9 $54,000 Bicycle Priority Lanes
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 1,200 $120,000 Reflective border on signal heads
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
8 signal heads $2,400 INT 2 $4,800
Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 2 $3,000 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $255,800 Table 6-5: Garvey Boulevard Countermeasure Concept Costs Vision Zero Action Plan
86 Outs
Low-Cost Bulb- Leading Pedestrian Interval Crosswalk
High Visibility Speed Feedback
Lane
Bicycle Priority
9 9
9 9
7 7
8 8
8 8 8
8 8 8
8 8
4 3
3 5 5
5 5
5 5
6 2
6 6
6 2 2
2 2
1 1
D
Figure 6-8: Valley Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Ramona Boulevard and North Peck Road Conflict Striping
Centerlines
Hardened
Signal Heads
Yellow Backed Pedestrian Signal
2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

6.3.4 Valley Boulevard
Zero measures.
to challenges to other roadway users and opportunities implementing Vision located here. The proximity to I-10 leads to ease of access for motorists but the City of El Monte. It is highly commercial and the El Monte Civic Center is between two cloverleaf intersections and is located in the central part of Valley Boulevard between Ramona Boulevard and North Peck Road is nestled Figure 6-8 provides concept level improvements with numlevel cost estimate is shown in bered callouts and corresponding sample pictures below the map. A concept Table 6-6.
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
87 Mid-block crossing at Meeker Avenue Crosswalks at Valley Boulevard and Ramona Boulevard

COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Hardened Centerlines
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Raised rubber centerline $2,500 EA 2 $5,000
High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 5 $27,500 Markings
Bicycle vs Vehicle Conflict Green w/ white edges, 50 ft length $6,000 EA 4 $24,000 Bicycle Priority Lanes
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 1,600 160,000 Pedestrian Signal - New
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA 1 $198,000 Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 2 $16,000 Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 4 $6,000 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $436,500 Table 6-6: Valley Boulevard Countermeasure Concept Costs Vision Zero Action Plan
88 Heads
Yellow Backed Signal Speed Feedback Signs Corner Radius Reduction with Truck Apron 3 3 3 3 3
2 6
2 2
1 1
5 5
4 E
Figure 6-9: Ramona Boulevard Project Sheet: Between Ferris Road and La Madera Avenue Bicycle Priority Lanes Curb Ramp
3 5 6 4 2 1
High Visibility Crosswalks

6.3.5 Ramona Boulevard
perfect location to implement Vision Zero measures.
for people walking and bicycling, as well as challenges for people driving. It is a the north side and lack of bicycle facilities leads to an inhospitable environment uses, and connects with the busy urban center of El Monte. Lack of sidewalks on eastern part of the City of El Monte. It has a mix of residential and commercial Ramona Boulevard between Ferris Road and La Madera Avenue is located in the Figure 6-9 provides concept
below the map. A concept level cost estimate is shown in level improvements with numbered callouts and corresponding sample pictures Table 6-7.
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
89 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Curb Ramp
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Concrete curbs, sidewalk, yellow ramp $7,000 EA 5 $35,000 Corner Radius Reduction or Truck Apron Concrete curbs and sidewalk $15,000 EA 1 $15,000 Concrete Sidewalk Concrete curb and sidewalk $410 LF 800 $328,000 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 3 $16,500 Bicycle Priority Lanes
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 1,600 $160,000 Electronic Feedback Signs
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 2 $16,000
Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 1 $1,500 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $572,000 Table 6-7: Ramona Boulevard Countermeasure Concept Costs Existing roadway conditions along Ramona Boulevard Bicyclists riding on sidewalk Vision Zero Action Plan
90 Low Cost Traffic Calming Circle
3 3
3 3 3
3 3
2 5 2
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
F
Figure 6-10: Magnolia Street Project Sheet: Between Allgeyer Avenue and Durfee Avenue High Visibility Crosswalks Advisory Bicycle Lane Low Cost-Bulb-Out 3 2 1 4 5
Yellow Backed Signal Heads

6.3.6 Magnolia Street
Zero improvements.
along and across Magnolia Street, making it an excellent candidate for Vision close to Payne School, leading to a desire line for students to move safely west, although it has commercial at the intersection with Durfee. It is located the southeastern part of the City of El Monte. It is mostly residential to the Magnolia Street between Allgeyer Avenue and Durfee Avenue is located in Figure 6-10 provides concept level improvements with
concept level cost estimate is shown in
numbered callouts and corresponding sample pictures below the map. A Table 6-8.
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
91 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Traffic Calming Circle
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Pavement markings and 'buttons' $33,000 EA 1 $33,000
Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
turn wedges
Pavement markings with ‘buttons’ and rubber $2,500 EA 10 $25,000 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 10 $55,000 Advisory Bicycle Lanes Bicycle lane stripes both sides of road $10 LF 1 1,600 $16,000 Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 1 $1,500 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $130,500 Table 6-8: Magnolia Street Countermeasure Concept Costs Existing roadway conditions along Magnolia Street Crosswalks at Magnolia Street and Durfee Avenue Vision Zero Action Plan
92 Pedestrian Scale Lighting NoRTOR Sign
5 4
4 4
4 2
3 3
2 1 1
G
Figure 6-11: Peck Road Project Sheet: Between Ranchito Street and Lower Azusa Road

6.3.7 Peck Road
Figure 6-11
conflict points, this corridor is a good candidate for Vision Zero improvements. a large signalized intersection. With numerous curb cuts leading to plenty of northern part of the City of El Monte. It is mostly commercial and located near Peck Road between Ranchito Street and Lower Azusa Road is located in the provides concept level improvements with numbered callouts and is shown in
corresponding sample pictures below the map. A concept level cost estimate Table 6-9.

Heads
Yellow Backed Signal Speed Feedback Signs Corner Radius Reduction with Truck Apron 3 5 4 2 1
(2009-2020)
Bicycle Priority Lanes
6 6
6 6
6 Implementation 06
93 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Corner Radius Reduction or Truck Apron
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Concrete curbs and sidewalk $15,000 EA 2 $30,000
Bicycle Priority Lanes
Pavement Markings
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 800 $80,000 Add NoRTOR sign / display
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Sign attached to existing signal structure $500 EA 4 $2,000 Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 1 $8,000 Reflective border on signal heads 8 signal heads $2,400 INT 2 $4,800 Street Lighting Fixture and power lines as needed $8,000 EA 2 $16,000 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $140,800 Table 6-9: Peck Road Countermeasure Concept Costs
Existing roadway conditions along Peck Road and Lower Azusa Road Crosswalks at Peck Road and Ranchito Street Vision Zero Action Plan
94 3
4 5
5 5
5 5
6 6
2 2
2 1
1 H
Figure 6-12: Tyler Avenue Project Sheet: Between Ramona Boulevard and Valley Boulevard

6.3.8 Tyler Avenue
Figure 6-12
to numerous curb cuts this is a great candidate for Vision Zero improvements. sides of the street. With no center median and plenty of conflict points due Valley Boulevard. The land use is commercial with big box stores on both Tyler Avenue is nestled between two large roadways: Ramona Boulevard and provides concept level improvements with numbered callouts and is shown in
corresponding sample pictures below the map. A concept level cost estimate Table 6-10.

Pedestrian Scale Lighting
Heads
Yellow Backed Signal Speed Feedback Signs Corner Radius Reduction with Truck Apron 3 5 6 4 2 1
NoRTOR Sign High Visability Crosswalk
(2009-2020)
Bicycle Priority Lanes
7 7
7 7
7 7 7
Implementation 06
95 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Corner Radius Reduction or Truck Apron
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Concrete curbs and sidewalk $15,000 EA 8 $120,000
Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
rubber turn wedges
Pavement markings with ‘buttons’ and $2,500 EA 7 $17,500 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 6 $33,000 Bicycle Priority Lanes
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 1,200 $120,000 Add NoRTOR sign / display
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Sign attached to existing signal structure $500 EA 4 $2,000 Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 2 $16,000 Street Lighting Fixture and power lines as needed $8,000 EA 10 $80,000 Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 3 $4,500 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $393,000 Table 6-10: Tyler Avenue Countermeasure Concept Costs
Existing roadway conditions along Tyler Avenue Intersection of Tyler Avenue and Ramona Boulevard Vision Zero Action Plan
96 Bicycle Priority Lanes
5 5
4 4
3 3
3 3
3 3
6 6
6 3
3 2
2 4
4 4
4 4
4 4 4
1 Conflict Striping Crossing Island Pedestrian Signal
I
Figure 6-13: Santa Anita Avenue Project Sheet: Between Ranchito Street and McGirk Avenue 3 5 6 4 2 1
High Visability Crosswalk Low-Cost Bulb-Outs

6.3.9 Santa Anita Avenue
the ideal candidate for Vision Zero projects.
speeds, the lack of bicycle facilities, and the numerous conflict points, it is commercial area that borders the San Gabriel Valley Airport. Given the high of the City of El Monte. It borders a mixed-use, mostly residential, partially Ranchito Street and McGirk Avenue, which is located in the western part Santa Anita Avenue is a large corridor that is nestled between small streets, Figure 6-13 provides concept level
below the map. A concept level cost estimate is shown in improvements with numbered callouts and corresponding sample pictures Table 6-11.
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
97 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Portland style)
Pedestrian Refuge Island (FHWA or
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Concrete curbs and landscaping $37,000 EA 2 $74,000
Bulb Out / Turn Wedge
rubber turn wedges
Pavement markings with ‘buttons’ and $2,500 EA 14 $35,000 High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 10 $55,000 Bicycle vs Vehicle Conflict Markings Green w/ white edges, 50 ft length $6,000 EA 7 $42,000 Bicycle Priority Lanes
thermoplastic
Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with $100 LF 1 1,600 $160,000 Pedestrian Signal - New
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA 1 $198,000 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $564,000 Table 6-11: Santa Anita Avenue Countermeasure Concept Costs Santa Anita Avenue at Emery Street Installation of new traffic signal at McGirk Avenue Vision Zero Action Plan
98 Bicycle Priority Lanes Hardened Centerlines
Heads
Yellow Backed Signal Speed Feedback Sign
3 3
5 6
3 3
3 2
2 4
1 J
Figure 6-14: Lower Azusa Road Project Sheet: Between Elrovia Avenue and Peck Road

6.3.10 Lower Azusa Road
Vision Zero improvements to improve the corridor for all modes of trans facilities and high speeds, giving it both challenges and opportunities to add mostly commercial to the east. It is a large, imposing roadway with no bicycle northern part of the City of El Monte. It is mostly residential to the west and Lower Azusa Road between Elrovia Avenue and Peck Road is located in the -
portation. Figure 6-14 provides concept level improvements with numbered cost estimate is shown in
callouts and corresponding sample pictures below the map. A concept level Table 6-12.

Pedestrian Signal
3 5 6 4 2 1
High Visability Crosswalk
(2009-2020)
Implementation 06
99 COUNTERMEASURE DESCRIPTION UNIT COST UM QUANTITY LENGTH WIDTH COST Hardened Centerlines
Concrete or Pavement Construction (low cost options use pavement markings) Raised rubber centerline $2,500 EA 1 $2,500
High Visibility Crosswalks
Pavement Markings
Continental spaced to avoid vehicle wheels $5,500 EA 6 $33,000 Bicycle Priority Lanes Bicycle lane centered in lane, filled with thermoplastic $100 LF 1 800 $80,000 Pedestrian Signal - New
Signs or Signal Infrastructure
Mast, power, concrete median, crosswalk $198,000 EA 1 $198,000 Electronic Feedback Signs Speed reader board on post (solar) $8,000 EA 1 $8,000 Signal Changes at Intersections
Signal Timing Adjustments
Adjust signal timing in Traffic Control Cabinet $1,500 INT 1 $1,500 INT = Intersection, Qty = Quantity, L = Length, W = Width, EA = Each, SF = Square Feet, LF = Linear Feet Total $323,000 Table 6-12: Lower Azusa Road Countermeasure Concept Costs Bicyclist riding on the sidewalk Intersection of Lower Azusa Road and Peck Road Vision Zero Action Plan
100

6.4 Funding Sources
Federal, state, and local government agencies invest billions of dolFunding Mechanisms for Vision Zero Programs According to the publication by the FHWA, an Analysis of Current of coordination to pull the various sources together.
has had more than one funding source and it often takes a good deal active transportation or complete street project in the United States to local governments on similar terms. Almost every implemented matching funding is generally required. State funds are often available calming, and Vision Zero projects, a certain level of state and/or local Whenever federal funds are used for bicycle, pedestrian, traffic available funds.
there is increasing competition between municipalities for the limited a funding source or may apply for the wrong type of grant. In addition, unfunded because communities may be unaware of the existence of limited and often hard to acquire. Desirable projects sometimes go Zero projects. Even though appropriate funds are available, they are improve conditions for pedestrian, bicycle, traffic calming, and Vision of that funding is used to develop policies, plans, and projects to lars every year in the nation’s transportation system. Only a fraction 1 at the Federal, State
FHWA publication.
local funding sources were derived from the previously mentioned jurisdictions. Some of the following information on federal, state, and used to improve conditions for bicyclists and pedestrians within their to develop a competitive project and detailed proposal that can be understanding of funding sources.” City staff are often in a position there is usually an active transportation coordinator with an extensive and Local Levels, “where successful local Vision Zero programs exist, Organization (MPO), for consideration for funding through their pro Caltrans ATP cycles are sent to SCAG, the local Metropolitan Planning Program (HSIP). Projects that are not awarded funding through the Greening Grants and through the Highway Safety Improvement Growth Council’s Sustainable Community Planning Grants, Urban (ATP) and Sustainable Transportation Planning grants, the Strategic through programs such as Caltrans’ Active Transportation Planning The City of El Monte should continue to pursue state level grants -
improvements not only increase the chances for multi-modal im and stormwater retention street designs, funding sources for these phases of projects. Due to trends in Low Impact Development (LID) funding opportunities that may be used from design to maintenance The following section identifies potential federal, state, and local due to combined benefits for multiple jurisdictions.
cities. Coordination and joint efforts also strengthen an application adjacent jurisdictions on any projects that affect and benefit both grams. It will be important to coordinate future planning efforts with -
provements but can also be incorporated into streetscape and development projects.

Implementation 06
101
Table 6-13: Federal Funding Sources
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Disabilities
Individuals with
Seniors and
Mobility of
Enhanced FTA
options.
expanding transportation mobility
service and
removing barriers to transportation
individuals with disabilities by
improve mobility for seniors and
The goal of this program is to Unavailable
X X
technology
or way-finding
• Improving signage,
path to a bus stop
• Building an accessible
programs
management
• Mobility Both
Program
Communities
Parks, Activating
Safe Routes to
Caltrans
School and
Routes to
for Safe
Center
National
engagement.
infused with proactive community
Sustainability, with each area heavily
Planning, 3) Implementation, and 4)
areas of activity: 1) Assessment, 2)
framework includes four main
parks and green spaces. The
safe and equitable access to
a structured process to increase
The program framework provides Unavailable
X X
•
action plans
• Safe Routes to Parks
Implementation
street design
way, maintenance, and
acquiring rights-ofactivities such as
Competitive
Planning - Sec
Development
Transit-Oriented
Pilot Program for
-
tion 20005(b)
FTA
Investment Grant (CIG) Program.
seek funding through the Capital
transit capital investment that will
and transportation planning with a
communities to integrate land use
Provides funding to local Annual
X
• TOD projects and
plans
Competitive
and Demonstra
Safety Research
-
tion Program
technologies and safer designs.
focuses on demonstration of
safety hazards. The SRD program
approaches to eliminate or mitigate
transit agencies to pursue innovative
technical and financial support for
of Transportation that provides
effort at the U.S. Department
part of a larger safety research
Demonstration (SRD) Program is
The Safety Research and Annual
X
• Operational safety
programs
Competitive
Access and Mobility Partnership Grants
medical transportation services.
services and non-emergency
the coordination of transportation
disadvantaged that will improve
projects for the transportation
funding to support innovative capital
This program provides competitive Unavailable
X
• Coordination of nonprogram
transportation services
emergency medical
Competitive
Vision Zero Action Plan
102
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Better Utilizing
Leverage Devel
Investments to
-
Grants Program
Transportation
opment (BUILD)
FTA
infrastructure, including transit.
investments in transportation
Discretionary Grants program funds
US DOT’s BUILD Transportation Annual
X
• Construction
projects
Competitive
Section 5310
Disabilities -
Individuals with
Seniors &
Mobility of
Enhanced
and persons with disabilities.
transportation needs of the elderly
nonprofit groups in meeting
the purpose of assisting private
Formula funding to states for Annual
X
• Planning program
disabilities
and individuals with
needs of seniors
transportation
to meet the special
Formula
Air
Mitigation and
Congestion
Programs -
Flexible Funding
Quality
USC 149
Program - 23
air quality benefit.

FTA funding as long as they have an
expenditures otherwise eligible for
may be used for any transit capital
elements of flexible spending. Funds
either air quality projects or other
apportionment of CMAQ funding for
areas still receive a minimum
no nonattainment or maintenance
particulate matter. States that have
ozone, carbon monoxide, and/or
nonattainment or maintenance for
CMAQ provides funding to areas in Annual
X X
quality standard
national ambient air
maintenance of a
attainment or
contribute to the
that is likely to
project or program
• Transportation Formula
Programs - Sur
Flexible Funding
-
face Transportation Block Grant
USC 133
Program - 23
pedestrian projects.
transit, intercity bus, bicycle and
transportation, including highway,
and performance of surface
and improve the conditions
wide range of projects to preserve
used by states and localities for a
Provides funding that may be Annual Formula
Implementation 06
103
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Poverty Program
Persistant
Areas of FTA
of Transportation’s focus on ad
In keeping with the U.S. Department
-
rates on our rural transportation in
and disproportionately high fatality
dressing the deteriorating conditions
-
challenges faced by areas of per
that will address the transportation
Poverty Program supports projects
frastructure, FTA’s Areas of Persistant
-
sistent poverty.

June
X
poverty
in areas of persistent
service and facilities
• Improve transit
Pilot
Mobility for All
Program
Grants
people of low income.
individuals with disabilities, and
community services for older adults,
mobility and access to vital
building partnerships to enhance
of transportation strategies and
employing innovative coordination
improve mobility options through
This funding opportunity seeks to January
X
• Transportation
transportation etc
facility for use in public
leasing equipment or a
purchase, IT purchase,
strategies, vehicle
mobility management
focus on employing
projects with a
Competitive
Program - 5312
Demonstration
Sandbox
Demand (MOD)
Mobility on
travelers.
equitable mobility options for all
deliver high quality, seamless and
innovative business models to
Funds projects that promote Annual
X
and tolling authorities
systems, or parking
transportation
services, university
airport connector
shuttle services,
as employee
services, such
transportation
• Operators of
suppliers
technology system
mobility providers, and
including shared use
organizations,
and not-for-profit
• Private for-profit Competitive
Vision Zero Action Plan
104
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Our Town
Endow
National
-
the Arts
ment for
physical, and/or social outcomes.
by advancing local economic,
that strengthen communities
design activities into efforts
that integrate arts, culture, and
These grants support projects
placemaking grants program.

Endowment for the Arts’ creative
Our Town is the National Aug-21
X
art)
(district, asset, and
• Cultural planning
public art)
performances,
co-creation of art,
festivals, community
(Artist residency, art
• Arts Engagement Competitive
Implementation 06
105
Table 6-14: State Funding Sources
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Options
Clean Mobility
Board
Resources
Air
Climate Investments)
housing communities (California
including some tribal and affordable
and low-income communities,
demand sharing) in disadvantaged
sharing, Bicycle sharing, and onmobility projects (such as car available for zero-emissions shared
The Program makes $20 million July
X
scooters
for bicycles and
improvements
right-of-way safety
• “Quick build”
programs
• Bicycleshare Formula
(STEP)
Equity Project
Transportation
Sustainable
Board
Resources
Air
without the use
can get where they need to go
access to key destinations so they
to increase community residents’
Funded projects will work together
in disadvantaged communities.
transportation and land use projects
clean
implementation block grants to fund
available for one to three
The Program makes $20 million
transportation and land use projects.
and prepare to implement clean
residents’ transportation needs
disadvantaged communities identify
intended to help low-income and
building grants. Funding is
available for planning and capacity
The Program makes $2 million August
X X X
signals
accessible pedestrian
including
enhancements,
• Street crossing
(nonmotorized users)
safety of pedestrians
mobility/access/
improve
• New walkways that
repair kiosks)
Bicycle lockers, Bicycle
(e.g., Bicycle racks,
repair infrastructure
storage, and
Bicycle parking,
• Publicly-accessible
infrastructure
IV) and supporting
Class II, or Class
routes (Class I,
• New Bicycle Competitive
Vision Zero Action Plan
106
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Program
and Roads (LSR)
Local Streets
Transporta
California
-
Commis
tion
-
sion
local streets and roads system.
and critical safety projects on the
road maintenance, rehabilitation,
year to cities and counties for basic
provide approximately $1.5 billion per
The purpose of the program is to Unavailable
X
to six schools (SRTS)
safety improvements
access and
construction of school
• Design and
pedestrians
bicyclists and
motorists,
separation between
• Create safety
striping
crosswalk signing and
• Implement enhanced Formula
Corridors (SCCP)
Congested
Solutions for
Transporta
California
-
Commis
tion
-
sion
neighborhood enhancement.
opportunities for
local communities and creating
preserving the character of
transportation choices while
corridor plan by providing more
and are part of a comprehensive
performance improvements
implement specific transportation
available annually for projects that
program makes $250 million
state. This statewide, competitive
reduce congestion throughout the
community access improvements to
transportation, environmental, and
achieve a balanced set of
provide funding to
The purpose of the program is to
Years
Every Two
X
improvements
• Intersection
station
plaza at a transit
improvements and
• Pedestrian
Class II Bicycleways
• Construct Class I and Competitive
Implementation 06
107
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
State Transportation Improve-
(STIP)
ment Program
Transporta
California
-
Commis
tion
-
sion/California Deof Trans
partment
-
(Caltrans)
portation
inclusion in the STIP.
appropriate, to nominate projects for
Planning Organization (MPO), as
Commission, or Metropolitan
(RTPA), County Transportation
Transportation Planning Agency
should work through their Regional
improvements. Local agencies
rail, and regional highway and transit
highway improvements, intercity
state transportation funds for state
for future allocations of certain
plan adopted by the Commission
The STIP is the biennial five-year
Years
Every Two
X
improvements
• Complete Streets
• Multi-Use paths
Bicycle lanes
• Class I, II, III, & IV
pedestrian bridge
and bicycle and
Access Improvements
Overcrossing and
• Bicycle/ped Competitive
Program
Urban Forestry
Depart
California
-
(CAL FIRE)
Protection
and Fire
Forestry
ment of
communities.
sustainable and vibrant
create
green infrastructure approaches to
green space that uses natural and
of an existing built environment into
projects that result in the conversion
This program funds Urban Greening Unavailable
X X
Biomass Utilization
• Urban Wood and
Management Activities
• Urban Forest
Improvement
Expansion and
Urban Forest Competitive
Infill Infrastructure Grant Program for Small
Jurisdictions
Depart
California
-
and Com
Housing
ment of
-
Develop
munity
-
ment
Code.

Division 31 of the Health and Safety
(commencing with section 53559) of
(Stats. 2019, ch. 159, 20) and Part 12.5
provided under Assembly Bill 101
and program requirements are
Infill Areas. Funding for this NOFA
Qualifying Infill Projects or Qualifying
Improvement Projects in support of
to provide grants for Capital
The purpose of the program is Varies
X
Competitive
Vision Zero Action Plan
108
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Active TransporGrants (ATP)
tation Planning Depart
California
-
Trans
ment of
-
(Caltrans)
portation
into a single program.

State Safe Routes to School (SRTS),
Transportation Account (BTA), and
Alternatives Program (TAP), Bicycle
including the Transportation
state transportation programs,
consolidates existing federal and
and bicycle plans. The ATP
School programs, and pedestrian
lanes, trails, Safe Routes to
Funding for Sidewalks, Bicycle
September
JulyX X X
• Quick-Build Project
Enforcement Activities
Encouragement, and
• Education,
Plan
• Active Transportation
School Plan
• Safe Routes to
Plan
• Bicycle, pedestrian
Improvements
• Capital Competitive
3 (SB 821
Act (TDA) Article
Development
Transportation
)
Depart
California
-
Trans
ment of
-
(Caltrans)
portation
transportation purposes.
transportation planning and mass
STA funding can only be used for
construction and maintenance. The
the LTF for local streets and roads,
1970 federal census) may also use
under 500,000 (according to the
are met, counties with a population
fund. Providing certain conditions
the State Transit Assistance (STA)
Local Transportation Fund (LTF), and
established two funding sources; the
transportation coordination. TDA
services and encourage regional
existing public transportation
The goal of this act is to improve
Improve
Access
Transit Stop
Article 3
and
projects
Pedestrian
Bicycle and
• Article 3
Annually
-
Program.
ment
X X
amenities
improvements and
for ADA bus stop
Improvement Program
Transit Stop Access
apply for the
to
member jurisdictions
• Partners with Formula
Implementation 06
109
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Planning Grants
Transportation
Sustainable
Depart
California
-
Trans
ment of
-
(Caltrans)
portation
Transportation Commission.

Guidelines adopted by the California
the Regional Transportation Plan
goals and best practices cited in
including, but not limited to, the
planning that furthers state goals,
to encourage local and regional
The program includes $29.5 million Annually
X
Connectivity Plan
• First/Last Mile
Development Plan
• Transit-Oriented
Communities Plan
• Sustainable
Plan
• Complete Streets
Feasibility Study
• Bicycle/ped Trail/Path
Plan
• Active Transportation
School Plan
• Safe Routes to Competitive
Safety Improve
Local Highway
-
(HSIP)
ment Program
Depart
California
-
Trans
ment of
-
(Caltrans)
portation
share of Californias HSIP funds.

Assistance manages local agencies
The Caltrans Division of Local
rate, or other data-supportedmeans.
experierence, crash potential, crash
are identified on the basis of crash
crash reduction factors. Projects
that have nationally recognized
infrastructure countermeasures
related fatalities by implementing
federal aid program to reduce traffic
United States Code 23 U.S.C 148 is a Annually
X
requirements.
or road realignment
environmental review,
right of way taking,
without significant
Strategic HSIP
with the California
projects consistent
safety improvement
• Construction ready Formula
Vision Zero Action Plan
110
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Urban Greening
Agency
Resources
Natural
California
(California Climate Investments)
schools.
workplaces, commercial centers, and
for travel between residences,
facilities that provide safe routes
paths, bicycle lanes or pedestrian
traveled by constructing bicycle
• Reduce commute vehicle miles
buildings
strategically planting trees to shade
• Reduce building energy use by
planting trees
• Sequester and store carbon by
include at least one of the following:
and provide multiple benefits. Must
projects that reduce GHG emissions
development of green infrastructure
The Program supports the Unavailable
X
Streets
• Complete Green
accessible by walking
that are publicly
transportation routes
create new active
or bicycle paths) or
routes (e.g., walking
active transportation
usability of existing
or improve the
• Projects that expand
and schools
commercial centers,
workplaces,
between residences,
recreation and travel
safe routes for both
trails that provide
• Non-motorized urban Competitive
Competitive
Program -
Partnership
Local
and
Formulaic
Transporta
California
-
tion Commission
Benefits
Transit and rail, Health and Safety
Conditions, Active Transportation,
improve aging Infrastructure, Road
Funding includes $200M/year to
to transportation improvements.
developer fees, dedicated solely
imposed fees, including uniform
improvements or that have
dedicated solely to transportation
voters have approved fees or taxes
transportation agencies in which
counties, cities, districts, and regional
program is to provide funding to
The primary objective of this
June
March -
X X X
overcrossing
pedestrian
• Expressway
facilities
pedestrian and bicycle
street,
improvements to
roundabouts, and
lane and 1 multi-lane
• Construct 4 singlesignage
lighting and
improvements to
enhancements,
pedestrian
curb extensions,
lanes and cycle track,
install class II Bicycle
• Close sidewalk gap, Both
Implementation 06
111
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
(SHOPP)
Program
and Protection
Operations
State Highway
Manage
SHOPP
Office of
Caltrans
-
ment
on the State Highway System.
highway operational improvements
safety improvements, and some
and preservation, emergency repairs,
it first” program that funds repairs
is the State Highway System’s “fix
portfolio of projects. The Program
and reporting the four year SHOPP
planning, developing, managing
responsible for
The Office of SHOPP Management is Unavailable
X
access
pedestrian and bicycle
striping, and improve
push buttons, refresh
• Upgrade pedestrian
updated corridors
• Add Bicycle lanes to
damaged pavement
• Reconstruct
ADA compliance
• Upgrade sidewalks to
Program
Safety Grant
Office of Traffic
Safety
Traffic
Office of
safety
be used for bicycle and pedestrian
their destination safely. Funds can
so that all roadway users arrive at
resulting from motor vehicle crashes
to prevent serious injury and death
The Program provides annual funds
January
Due in
X
• SRTS safety programs
promote safety
• Campaigns to
encourage
• Safety education and Competitive
Program
Communities
Sustainable
Housing and
Affordable
and De
Council
Growth
Strategic
-
and Com
of Housing
partment
-
Develop
munity
-
ment
(California Climate Investments)
latest round.

The Program included $550M in its
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
infill and compact development that
preservation projects to support
housing, transportation, and land
The Program funds land-use, February
X X
such as bulb-outs
• Pedestrian facilities
bicycle facilities
• Install dedicated
center
housing and transit
sidewalks to affordable
• Bicycleways and
networks
connectivity to transit
projects to encourage
• Active transportation
Bicycle facilities
• Class I, II, III, & IV Competitive
Vision Zero Action Plan
112
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Grant Program
Partnership
Local
Transporta
California
-
tion Commission
alternative to driving.
provide or facilitate a viable
the traveling public, or otherwise
enhance access or convenience of
ridership, improve transit safety,
transit services, increase transit
including guideways, that expand
Improvements to transit facilities, Summer
X
upgrades
• Fare collection
improvements
• Bus shelter
model
• New operational
payment systems
• Innovative fare
O&M facilities
construction of new
facility upgrades or
• Maintenance
buses
power alternative fuel
infrastructure to fuel/
• Charging
acquisition
• Alternative fuel buses Both
Grants
Placemaking
(NAR)
of Realtors
Association
National
in a community.
destinations accessible to everyone
sites and “eyesores” into welcoming
transforming unused and underused
communities better places to live by
as placemaking as a way to make
to different people, but NAR looks
Placemaking means many things October
X
• Artist fees
• Site preparation
etc.)
landscaping, murals,
signage, materials,
furniture, paint,
• Amenities (street Competitive
Implementation 06
113
SOURCE

FUNDING FUNDING

ORIGIN PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

EXAMPLES

COMPETITIVE/
FORMULA INFRASTRUCTURE NONINFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING
Platform
Fundrasing
Online IOBY
more fun.
healthier, greener, more livable, and
neighborhoods more sustainable,
their communities to make our
with support and funding from
platform helps connect local leaders
the ground up. Our crowdfunding
to build real, lasting change from
crowdfund the resources they need
ioby gives local leaders the ability to
what’s best for the neighborhood.
and for trusting neighbors to know
each other, for civic participation,
but it also stands for taking care of
ioby stands for “in our backyards,” Ongoing
X
• Recycling programs
Nutrition programs
• Public Health &
Greening programs
• Open Space &
• Mutual Aid programs
• Education programs
• Compost programs
programs
• Climate change
• Clean water programs
• Clear air programs
Climate Commu
Transformative
-
nities (TCC)
Depart
Council/
Growth
Strategic
-
Conserva
ment of
-
tion
February
X
Vision Zero Action Plan
114

REGIONAL SOURCE FUNDING ORIGIN PURPOSE/ DESCRIPTION FUNDING CYCLE Measure A Los Angeles County
and improve our local parks, access to parks, beaches, and open spaces inequities. An initiative to replace much-needed funding to build, maintain, Drafted to meet current and future park access and needs address Annually
Measure M Los Angeles County
connections, Bicycle share and greenways.
fund major highway and transit projects and bicycle and pedestrian Authorizes a new one-half cent sales tax starting in 2017 that will help Annually
Program (MSP)
Measure M Subregional Los Angeles County
programming plans in the San Gabriel Valley.

MSP funds through the development of five-year subregional fund respective governing/planning entities. San Gabriel Valley COG administers Measure M subregional funds are programmed by the subregions’ Annually
Program
Fastrak Reinvestment LA Metro
projects.
congestion on the I-110 or I-10 such as transit and active transportation Corridor reinvestment plan must provide a direct benefit to reducing Annual grants
Measure W Los Angeles County
streets and complete streets.

Focus on communities that are the most vulnerable to create green water quality, and invest in making communities greener and more livable.

A parcel tax that would increase L.A. County’s local water supply, improve Annually
Community Program
SCAG Sustainable
of Governments (SCAG)
Sourthern California Association
Gas Reduction programs
Green Region: Natural Resource Plans, Climate Action Plans, Green House Active Transportation: Bicycle, Pedestrian and Safe Routes to School Plans Development, Land Use & Transportation Integration.

Integrated Land Use: Sustainable Land Use Planning, Transit Oriented important local and regional transportation planning efforts.

Planning grants to jurisdictions for technical assistance to complete Annually
Table 6-15: Local / Regional Funding Sources:

Implementation 06
115

6.5 Measuring Implementation
Ultimately, success will be reaching zero fatalities and serious inju deems the most important to allocate limited resources towards. for the upcoming year. The City must decide on the metrics that it will help the City update the public on progress and advance efforts projects and programs. Identifying and employing several strategies are meant to quantify the impact and effectiveness of Vision Zero The following are best practice performance measures, each of which Progress with Performance Measures
-
Annually, tracking the following data points are key. Below are exam which increases safety due to the “Safety in Numbers” phenomenon. decrease, while increasing the mode split for walking and bicycling, ries by 2027. Each year, the overarching goal is for collision trends to -
»
organized by the six Es.
ples the City can use to assist with developing performance measures, Number of Bicycle Rodeos held
» Number of sixth grade students taught about bicycle safety » Percentage of sixth grade students in El Monte taught about bicycle safety » Number of events to promote quick-build installations. »
activities.

Annual number of complete Safe Routes to School events or » Number of people reached in Individualized Marketing campaign » Percentage of students or staff who arrive to and from school without using a car, citywide. » Number of vehicles ticketed for parking in bicycle lanes » Percent of streets where speed surveys have been conducted. » Number of sting operations conducted to enforce yielding to pedestrians in crosswalks » Number of sting operations conducted to enforce motorists complying with No Right Turn On Red »
segments.

Number of quick-build installations at intersections or roadway » Percent of total citywide street mileage dedicated to active transII, & IV bicycle facilities, and complete sidewalk networks). portation facilities (such as bicycle parking, street closures, Class I, » Percent of sidewalk and bicycle network gaps closed.
» Number of CIP projects funded per year that address safety issues. »
areas within 1/2 mile of a school or transit stop.

Percent of bicycle and sidewalk repairs completed, focusing on »
installed.

Percent of streets and intersections with traffic calming measures »
focusing around schools and parks.

Percent of streets where posted speed limits have been reduced, »
marked or signed bicycle accommodations.

Total miles of on-street bikeways defined by streets with clearly » Total miles of streets with pedestrian accommodations. » Number of missing or non-compliant curb ramps along City Streets.

ENCOURAGEMENT

EDUCATION

ENGINEERING

ENFORCEMENT
Vision Zero Action Plan
116
»
neighborhoods.

Percent of bicycle networks in the most disadvantaged
»
safety issues.

Number of grants funded per year that address equity-related » Number of improved pedestrian infrastructure projects installed. »
people with disabilities and active transportation.

Number of intersections where signals have been optimized for » Number of permanent bicycle and pedestrian counters installed »
bicycling
Number of manual counts performed for people walking and »
travel mode, age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Total number of motorist collisions, fatalities, and serious injuries by »
by travel mode, age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Total number of pedestrian collisions, fatalities, and serious injuries »
travel mode, age, sex, and race/ethnicity.

Total number of bicycle collisions, fatalities, and serious injuries by » Reduction of fatalities or serious injuries caused by collisions involving people walking and bicycling. » Percentage of new street projects that are multi-modal. » Traffic counts of all road users along major streets.

EQUITY

EVALUATION
Federal Highway Administration Analysis of Current Funding Mecha 1 Endnote
-
nisms for Vision Zero Programs. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa20025/chap3.cfm Appendix
A
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-2
A.1 High-Injury Network Overview
The following collision trees and hot spot maps show the less common collision types than shown in Chapter 2.

Lanes
Median
Control
Intersection
Location Relative to Intersection
Auto-auto collisions
2009 - 2019
1 Lane
1 2 Lane
79 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
146
5 Lane
1 4 Lane
63 5 Lane
1 4 Lane
4 2 Lane
92 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
63 5 Lane 2
6 Lane
1 4 Lane
35 6 Lane
9 4 Lane
16 6 Lane
17 6 Lane
1 2 Lane
81 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
84 5 Lane
1 6 Lane
1 4 Lane
46 5 Lane
5 4 Lane
20 6 Lane
2 2 Lane
71 3 Lane
33 4 Lane
20 6 Lane
4 4 Lane
34 No
Median
104
Median
Raised
34 Median
Painted
24 No
Median
228
Median
Painted
81 Median
Raised
5 No
Median
159
Median
Painted
44 Median
Raised
16 Total number of
auto-auto collisions
936
Signalized
314
Non-signalized
219
No
Median
168
Median
Painted
53 Median
Raised
20 Intersections
533
Intersection Influence Areas
241
Midblock
162
Appendix A
A-3
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!!! !! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
!
! ! !
!!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!! ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! !!
! ! !
!!
! ! !!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!! !! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !! !!
!! !! !! !! !! !! !!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!!
!!
!!!! !!!! !! !! !!!! !!
!!
!! !!!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!! !! !!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!! !!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!!! !!
!! !! !! !! !! !!
!!!!!! !! !!
!!!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!! !! !! !! !!
!!
!! !! !! !! !! !! !!!! !! !! !! !!
!! !!!! !! !!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!!!
!!
!!
!! !!!!
!!
!!!! !!!! !! !!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at intersection influence areas with no median Auto-only collisions
!! 2 through-lanes (81)
!! 4 through-lanes (84)
All auto-only collisions at intersection influence areas ! 241
Figure A-1: Auto Intersection Influence Area Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
A-4
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
! !! ! ! !
!
! ! ! !!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!! ! ! ! !!! !
!
!!! ! !
!
!
!! !
! !
!
!
! !!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!! ! !
! ! !!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
! ! !
! !
! ! ! !
!
! !! !! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!!! !! ! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!!!
!!
!!!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!!!!! !! !! !!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at signalized 4-lane intersections with no median Auto-only collisions
!! 146
All auto-only collisions at signalized intersections
! 314
Figure A-2: Auto-Auto Signalized Intersection Collisions Appendix A
A-5
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
! !! !
!!
! ! ! !
!! ! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!! !! !! !! !! !!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions @ non-signalized 2-lane intersections with no median Auto-only collisions
!! 92
All auto-only collisions at non-signalized intersections ! 219
Figure A-3: Auto-Auto Non-Signalized Intersection Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
A-6
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
!
! ! !
!
!! ! !
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
! !!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!! !
! ! !
!
!! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !! !!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!!! !! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Midblock collisions on 2-lane roads with no median
Auto-only collisions
!! 71
All auto-only midblock collisions
! 162
Figure A-4: Auto-Auto Midblock Collisions
Appendix A
A-7
Lanes
Median
Control
Intersection
Location Relative to Intersection
Bicyclist-involved collisions
2009-2019
2 Lane
20 4 Lane
1 4 Lane
4 4 Lane
13 1 Lane
1 2 Lane
54 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
49 5 Lane
1 4 Lane
11 6 Lane
3 4 Lane
15 1 Lane
1 2 Lane
24 3 Lane
2 4 Lane
48 4 Lane
17 6 Lane
8 4 Lane
1 6 Lane
1 1 Lane
1 2 Lane
31 4 Lane
32 4 Lane
9 6 Lane
2 4 Lane
5 5 Lane
1 No
Median
21 Median
Raised
13 Median
Painted
4 No
Median
107
Median
Painted
14 Median
Raised
15 No
Median
75 Median
Painted
25 Median
Raised
2 No
Median
64 Median
Painted
11 Median
Raised
6 Non-signalized
135
Signalized
102
Intersections
238
Midblock
38 Intersection Influence Areas
81 Total number of
bicyclist-involved
collisions
357
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-8
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
!!!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! !
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !!!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions @ intersection influence areas on 4-lane roads with no median Bicycle-involved collisions
!! 32
All bicycle-involved collisions @ intersection influence areas ! 81
Figure A-5: Bicycle Involved Intersection Influence Area Collisions Appendix A
A-9
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !! !
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§
!!
605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions @ signalized 4-lane intersections with no median Bicycle-involved collisions
!! 48
All bicycle-involved collisions @ signalized intersections ! 102
Figure A-6: Bicycle Involved Signalized Intersection Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
A-10
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !! !!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at non-signalized intersections with no median Bicycle-involved collisions
!! 2 through-lanes (54)
!! 4 through-lanes (49)
All bicycle-involved collisions at non-signalized intersections ! 135
Figure A-7: Bicycle Involved Non-Signalized Intersection Collisions Appendix A
A-11
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Midblock collisions on 2-lane roads with no median
Bicycle-involved collisions
!! 20
All bicycle-involved midblock collisions
! 38
Figure A-8: Bicycle Involved Midblock Collisions
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-12
Lanes
Median
Control
Intersection
Location Relative to Intersection
Pedestrian-involved Collisions
2009 - 2019
2 Lane
50 4 Lane
15 5 Lane
1 4 Lane
3 4 Lane
6 6 Lane
1 2 Lane
26 3 Lane
1 4 Lane
58 4 Lane
9 6 Lane
3 4 Lane
1 1 Lane
1 2 Lane
18 4 Lane
16 4 Lane
7 4 Lane
4 2 Lane
17 4 Lane
4 4 Lane
2 4 Lane
6 6 Lane
1 No
Median
22 Median
Raised
6 Median
Painted
2 No
Median
66 Median
Painted
3 Median
Raised
7 No
Median
85 Median
Painted
12 Median
Raised
1 No
Median
35 Median
Painted
7 Median
Raised
4 Non-signalized
76 Signalized
98 Intersections
174
Midblock
30 Intersection Influence Areas
46 Total Number of
Pedestrian-involved
collisions
250
Appendix A
A-13
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
! !!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
! !!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!!
!!
!!!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at intersection influence areas with no median Pedestrian-involved collisions
!! 2 through-lanes (18)
!! 4 through-lanes (16)
All pedestrian-involved collisions at intersection influence areas ! 46
Figure A-9: Pedestrian Involved Intersection Influence Area Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
A-14
!
! !
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
! ! !!!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
! !! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !! !! !!!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!! !!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at signalized 4-lane intersections with no median Pedestrian-involved collisions
!! 58
All pedestrian-involved collisions at signalized intersections ! 98
Figure A-10: Pedestrian Involved Signalized Intersection Collisions Appendix A
A-15
!!
!!
! !
! !!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!! ! !
! !
!
!
! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
! !
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!! !! !! !!
!!
!! !! !!
!!!! !!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!! !!
!! !!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Collisions at non-signalized 2-lane intersections with no median Pedestrian-involved collisions
!! 250
All pedestrian-involved collisions at non-signalized intersections ! 76
Figure A-11: Pedestrian Involved Non-Signalized Intersection Collisions Vision Zero Action Plan
A-16
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !! !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!! !!
!!
!!
!!
!!
!!
¨¦§605
¨¦§10
Pec k Rd
Rio Hondo River
San Gabriel River
«¬60
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Garv ey Av e
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
Durfe e Ave
Baldw in Ave
Sa nta An ita Av e
Ram ona B lvd
Pe ck R d
Te mple Cit y Bl vd
Ros eme ad Blv d
Low er Azu sa Roa d
Ty ler Ave
Va lley Blvd
[ 0.5
Miles
Midblock collisions on 2-lane roads with no median
Pedestrian-involved collisions
!! 17
All pedestrian-involved midblock collisions
! 30
Figure A-12: Pedestrian Involved Midblock Collisions
Appendix A
A-17
• Develop and apply policies for
are to:

The goals of the Vision Zero program

PROJECT GOALS

FACT SHEET
increasing safety for all modes.
• Develop projects for
implementation.
• Analyze the data and tell the
meet these goals
and proven countermeasures can
story of how collision analysis
.

By collecting, analyzing, and
developing projects, this plan will
provide the City of El Monte a
roadmap for future safety planning
more importantly, funding for
and project development and
implementation!
systemic changes are needed in our traffic safety work to make meaningful progress. is a fundamental shift in philosophy and approach to traffic safety that acknowledges guidance to make bicycle and pedestrian environment safer for residents. Vision Zero The El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan (EMVZAP) will provide the necessary tools and

PROJECT TIMELINE
Safety is our priority. We want to hear from you!
https://arcg.is/n9TqG
please visit:

For more information,
Data Analysis Project Start
Final Plan
Draft Plan
Existing
Conditions
Policies &
Proposed
Bus Safety
Projects
Winter 2020
Winter 2021/2022
Spring 2022
March 2021
Summer 2021
Community Engagement
Winter 2020 - Spring 2022
Policy
Development
Strategy &
Financing
Implementation
Framework
• Analyze where and why crashes are

PROJECT GOALS
occurring in El Monte
• Identify projects and programs to
related fatalities and serious injuries
reduce crashes and eliminate traffic-
• Develop and apply policies for
transportation.
increasing safety for all modes of
• Develop traffic safety projects for
implementation.

As part of the El Monte Vision Zero Plan, the City of El Monte and Go Human Date:
would like to see bicycle and pedestrian improvements throughout the City.

Monte. Visit us at the El Monte Farmers Market to provide input on where you improvements that make it safer and more enjoyable to walk, bike, and roll in El invite you to experience and share your feedback on proposed street safety September 30, 2021
When: 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.

Where: El Monte Farmers Market (on Main Street between Santa Anita Ave and Tyler Ave)
Your safety is our priority. We want to hear from you!
https://arcg.is/n9TqG
please visit:

For more information,
mobility for all.
while increasing safe, healthy, equitable
all traffic fatalities and severe injuries,
residents. Vision Zero seeks to eliminate
and pedestrian environments safer for
tools and guidance to make bicycle
(EMVZAP) will provide the necessary
The El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
A.2 Outreach Materials
Figure A-13: Project Factsheet Figure A-14: Project Factsheet for Farmers Market Vision Zero Action Plan
A-18
Figure A-15: Social Media Posts on El Monte Instagram
Appendix A
A-19
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
Q1 How would you best describe your relationship with the City of El Monte? Check all that apply.

Answered: 81 Skipped: 0

69.1% 69.1%

13.6% 13.6%

8.6% 8.6%

2.5% 2.5%

11.1% 11.1%

9.9% 9.9%

1.2% 1.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Resident
Live and work
in El Monte
Work in El
Monte but li...

Own a business
in El Monte
Student
Occasional
Other (please
visitor (for...
specify)
A.3 Survey Results
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-20
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

69.1% 56

13.6% 11

8.6% 7

2.5% 2

11.1% 9

9.9% 8

1.2% 1
#
Total Respondents: 81

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Immigrant 5/18/2021 7:29 AM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Occasional visitor (for example, family, friends, recreation, special events) Student
Own a business in El Monte
Work in El Monte but live outside city limits
Live and work in El Monte
Resident
Appendix A
A-21
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
3 / 36

16.3% 13

5.0% 4

28.7% 23

30.0% 24

20.0% 16
Q2 What is your age?
Answered: 80 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 80
0 – 18 years old 0 – 18 years old 16.3% (13) 16.3% (13) 0 – 18 years old 16.3% (13) 19 – 24 years old 19 – 24 years old 5.0% (4) 5.0% (4) 19 – 24 years old 5.0% (4) 25 – 34 years old 25 – 34 years old 28.7% (23) 28.7% (23) 25 – 34 years old 28.7% (23) 35 – 54 years old 35 – 54 years old 30.0% (24) 30.0% (24) 35 – 54 years old 30.0% (24) 55 years and up 55 years and up 20.0% (16) 20.0% (16) 55 years and up 20.0% (16)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
55 years and up
35 – 54 years old
25 – 34 years old
19 – 24 years old
0 – 18 years old
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-22
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
4 / 36
Q3 How frequently do you use the following transportation modes? Answered: 80 Skipped: 1

8.1% 8.1%

32.2% 32.2%

9.5% 9.5%

32.2% 32.2%

1.4% 1.4%

8.5% 8.5%

1.6% 1.6%

18.9% 18.9%

5.1% 5.1%

19.7% 19.7%

62.2% 62.2%

22.0% 22.0%

50.8% 50.8%
Personal
vehicle
Transit (bus,
Walking
light rail)
Appendix A
A-23
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
5 / 36

9.8% 9.8%

48.3% 48.3%

72.3% 72.3%

18.0% 18.0%

20.0% 20.0%

21.3% 21.3%

8.3% 8.3%

4.3% 4.3%

15.0% 15.0%

2.1% 2.1%
Bicycling
(including...

Other wheeled
Wheelchair
mode (e.g....

Vision Zero Action Plan
A-24
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
6 / 36

62.2%
46 18.9%
14 1.4%
1 9.5%
7 8.1%
6 74

22.0%
13 5.1%
3 8.5%
5 32.2%
19 32.2%
19 59

50.8%
31 19.7%
12 1.6%
1 18.0%
11 9.8%
6 61

15.0%
9 8.3%
5 8.3%
5 20.0%
12 48.3%
29 60

2.1%
1 4.3%
2 0.0%
0 21.3%
10 72.3%
34 47

0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 100.0%
47 47
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Getting rides 5/18/2021 7:29 AM
100.0% 100.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Daily Weekly Monthly Every now …
Never

DAILY WEEKLY MONTHLY EVERY NOW AND THEN NEVER TOTAL
Wheelchair
Other wheeled mode (e.g. skateboard, scooter, etc.)
Bicycling (including electric)
Walking
Transit (bus, light rail)
Personal vehicle
Appendix A
A-25
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
7 / 36

52.3% 34

55.4% 36

52.3% 34

7.7% 5

15.4% 10
Q4 Your top concerns related to personal motor vehicle are:

Answered: 65 Skipped: 16
#
Total Respondents: 65

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 too easy to drive 10/5/2021 3:14 PM

52.3% 52.3%

55.4% 55.4%

52.3% 52.3%

7.7% 7.7%

15.4% 15.4%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Traffic speeds
Road conditions
the road wit...

Safety sharing
Using my
personal...

Other (please
specify)

52.3% 34

55.4% 36

52.3% 34

7.7% 5

15.4% 10
#
Total Respondents: 65

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 too easy to drive 10/5/2021 3:14 PM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Using my personal vehicle is not convenient
Safety sharing the road with bikes and other wheeled vehicles Road conditions
Traffic speeds
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
2 loud cars 10/5/2021 2:59 PM
3 cyclist not visible in early hours 10/5/2021 2:57 PM
4 transients run in front of me 10/5/2021 2:37 PM
5 congestion 10/5/2021 2:03 PM
6 not compliant with stops 10/5/2021 2:01 PM
7 safety of peds noice = speeds 10/5/2021 1:50 PM
8 Dangerous Drivers 6/7/2021 3:52 PM
9 When people purposely throw their vehicles and claim they didn't see you. Makes me real angry. 5/18/2021 7:38 AM 10 Safety of Intersections - particularly uncontrolled turning 5/11/2021 12:40 PM Appendix A
A-27
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
9 / 36
Q5 Your top concerns related to transit (bus, light rail) are:

Answered: 57 Skipped: 24
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

45.6% 45.6%

21.1% 21.1%

19.3% 19.3%

28.1% 28.1%

21.1% 21.1%

22.8% 22.8%

12.3% 12.3%

10.5% 10.5%

17.5% 17.5%

19.3% 19.3%

21.1% 21.1%

19.3% 19.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Lack of
lighting
Lack of human
activity
Criminal
activity
Excessive
Vagrancy
graffiti/van...

Missing
transit shelter
Missing seating
Missing
transit...

Transit stop
location
Using transit
is not...

Unsafe traffic
conditions
Other (please
specify)
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-28
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
11 / 36

45.6% 26

21.1% 12

19.3% 11

28.1% 16

21.1% 12

22.8% 13

12.3% 7

10.5% 6

17.5% 10

19.3% 11

21.1% 12

19.3% 11
#
Total Respondents: 57

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Ramona/ people zoom through 10/5/2021 2:59 PM
2 homeless use our shelters 10/5/2021 2:44 PM
3 trash 10/5/2021 1:50 PM
4 Social distancing 8/30/2021 5:43 PM
5 never used transit 8/21/2021 2:47 PM
6 Unsafe pedestrians in danger walking thru gate that’s busted which crosses bus and sheriff get entrance and exit 7/20/2021 4:41 AM 7 Infrequent service or bus stops running too early 6/7/2021 3:52 PM 8 Many El Monte trolley stops do not have signs, hard to find. 6/2/2021 11:22 PM 9 question three times? and receive an Haaa! For an answer From the Metrolink station, simply by asking questions. Some bus drivers don't even speak ESL. Can I repeat the same Trolley services sometimes I believe they are properly owned. It's difficult to make it to Telstar Ave. or Division 9 gateway. 5/18/2021 7:38 AM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please sp
Unsafe traffic conditions
Using transit is not convenient
Transit stop location
Missing transit wayfinding or scheduling information
Missing seating
Missing transit shelter
Excessive graffiti/vandalism
Vagrancy
Criminal activity
Lack of human activity
Lack of lighting
ecify)
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
10 Better safety and public signage 5/11/2021 2:06 PM
11 Infrequent service 5/6/2021 4:42 PM
Appendix A
A-29
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
13 / 36

50.0% 31

43.5% 27

21.0% 13

33.9% 21

14.5% 9
Q6 Your top concerns related to walking are:

Answered: 62 Skipped: 19
#
Total Respondents: 62

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 lack of lighting 10/6/2021 9:10 AM

50.0% 50.0%

43.5% 43.5%

21.0% 21.0%

33.9% 33.9%

14.5% 14.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Lack of
Unmaintained
sidewalks or...
sidewalks
Walking is not
convenient
Unsafe traffic
conditions
Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Unsafe traffic conditions
Walking is not convenient
Unmaintained sidewalks
Lack of sidewalks or disconnected sidewalks
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-30
13 / 36

50.0% 31

43.5% 27

21.0% 13

33.9% 21

14.5% 9
#
Total Respondents: 62

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 lack of lighting 10/6/2021 9:10 AM
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Unsafe traffic conditions
Walking is not convenient
Unmaintained sidewalks
Lack of sidewalks or disconnected sidewalks
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
2 transients 10/5/2021 3:04 PM
3 homelessness 10/5/2021 2:59 PM
4 lots of transients 10/5/2021 2:57 PM
5 alot of areas do not have the flashing light for crossing, esp. North 10/5/2021 1:58 PM 6 crossings cleanliness 10/5/2021 1:50 PM
7 laziness 8/30/2021 5:46 PM
8 gateway yo the exchange
Exposure of pedestrians using bike trail gate passing thru private property onto tod development next door Calle the 7/20/2021 4:41 AM 9 I follow the rules and watch where I am going no issues walking. 6/15/2021 1:43 AM Appendix A
A-31
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
15 / 36

41.8% 23

45.5% 25

14.5% 8

27.3% 15

18.2% 10
Q7 Your top concerns related to biking are:

Answered: 55 Skipped: 26
#
Total Respondents: 55

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 speeding cars 10/5/2021 2:59 PM

41.8% 41.8%

45.5% 45.5%

14.5% 14.5%

27.3% 27.3%

18.2% 18.2%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
high motor...

Exposure to
Lack of
infrastructu...

Cannot
ride/not...

Biking is not
convenient
Other (please
specify)

41.8% 23

45.5% 25

14.5% 8

27.3% 15

18.2% 10
#
Total Respondents: 55

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 speeding cars 10/5/2021 2:59 PM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Biking is not convenient
Cannot ride/not comfortable riding a bike
Lack of infrastructure for bikes (i.e. bike lanes/shared use paths) Exposure to high motor vehicle speeds
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
2 no infrastructure low visability 10/5/2021 2:57 PM
3 not a lot of infrastructure 10/5/2021 2:44 PM
4 biking on sidewalks 10/5/2021 2:01 PM
5 lazy 8/30/2021 5:46 PM
6 Dangerous allowing public to access private property being a multifamily development 7/20/2021 4:41 AM 7 their bikes across bu
Cyclists when they follow the rules and obey the traffic laws have no issues. Maybe they should stay to the right and walk sy intersections rather than mix with cars and run stops 6/15/2021 1:43 AM
8 Reckless drivers 6/7/2021 3:52 PM
9 Citations with a good lawsuit will solve the problem. 5/18/2021 7:38 AM 10 Adults riding bikes on sidewalks. 5/17/2021 8:14 PM
Appendix A
A-33
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
17 / 36

54.2% 26

41.7% 20

12.5% 6

20.8% 10

6.3% 3
Q8 Your top concerns related to other wheeled modes, such as e-scooters and skateboards (not including wheelchair) are:

Answered: 48 Skipped: 33
Total Respondents: 48

54.2% 54.2%

41.7% 41.7%

12.5% 12.5%

20.8% 20.8%

6.3% 6.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
high motor...

Exposure to
Lack of
infrastructu...

Cannot
ride/not...
modes are no...

Other wheeled
Other (please
specify)

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Other wheeled modes are not convenient
Cannot ride/not comfortable
Lack of infrastructure (i.e. bike lanes/shared use paths) Exposure to high motor vehicle speeds
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-34
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 between sidewalks and streets to avoid stopping for lights and signs. Failure to yield to traffic is their biggest problem.

When they follow the laws and are giving the right away to regular traffic I see no issues. But they also run lights and switch 6/15/2021 1:43 AM 2 Another lawsuit, to pay medical bills. Tony Hawks it's a hero! 5/18/2021 7:38 AM 3 Needs more even sidewalks and/or bike lanes 5/11/2021 2:06 PM Appendix A
A-35
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
19 / 36
Q9 Your top concerns related to using a wheelchair are:

Answered: 40 Skipped: 41

40.0% 40.0%

35.0% 35.0%

27.5% 27.5%

20.0% 20.0%

42.5% 42.5%

5.0% 5.0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Lack of
Unmaintained
sidewalks or...
sidewalks
ADA curb ramps
high motor...

Exposure to
Using a
Other (please
wheelchair i...
specify)
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-36
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

40.0% 16

35.0% 14

27.5% 11

20.0% 8

42.5% 17

5.0% 2
#
Total Respondents: 40

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Don't use 10/6/2021 9:10 AM
2 to be able to go around (i.e. Santa Anita and Ramona) I work with students with disabilities and sometimes the light poles and signage takes up too much space on the sidewalk 5/6/2021 2:56 PM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
ADA cur
Unmaintained sidewalks
Lack of sidewalks or disconnected sidewalks
b ramps
Other (please specify)
Using a wheelchair is not necessary for me to travel to my destinations Exposure to high motor vehicle speeds
Appendix A
A-37
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
21 / 36
Q10 What would encourage you to walk more in El Monte?
Answered: 63 Skipped: 18

34.9% 34.9%

46.0% 46.0%

33.3% 33.3%

46.0% 46.0%

44.4% 44.4%

30.2% 30.2%

38.1% 38.1%

19.0% 19.0%

17.5% 17.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Continuous and
connected...

Wider sidewalks
Marked
crosswalks
Street lighting
Street
trees/parkways
Slower traffic
speeds
stop signs
Signals or
Shorter
crossings
Other (please
specify)
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-38
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
22 / 36

34.9% 22

46.0% 29

33.3% 21

46.0% 29

44.4% 28

30.2% 19

38.1% 24

19.0% 12

17.5% 11
#
Total Respondents: 63

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 destinations 10/5/2021 3:16 PM
2 police enforcement 10/5/2021 2:40 PM
3 more destinations 10/5/2021 2:15 PM
4 policing 10/5/2021 2:03 PM
5 its too hot 10/5/2021 2:01 PM
6 Safety measures 10/5/2021 1:53 PM
7 Trash 10/5/2021 1:49 PM
8 I don't live in El Monte, jut work in the city 8/21/2021 2:49 PM 9 No public access 7/20/2021 4:45 AM
10 Police on paths and clean trails 6/15/2021 1:52 AM
11 A Liquor store in every apple! 5/18/2021 7:42 AM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
Shorter crossings
Signals or stop signs
Slower traffic speeds
Street trees/parkways
Street lighting
Marked crosswalks
Wider sidewalks
Continuous and connected sidewalks
Appendix A
A-39
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
23 / 36
Q11 What would make it easier for you to bike more or use other non-motorized wheeled transportation in El Monte?
Answered: 61 Skipped: 20
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

65.6% 65.6%

29.5% 29.5%

31.1% 31.1%

14.8% 14.8%

8.2% 8.2%

31.1% 31.1%

23.0% 23.0%

27.9% 27.9%

36.1% 36.1%

9.8% 9.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
On-street bike
lanes
Off-street
Bike share
bike paths
Electric bike
(e-bike) share
Electric
scooter share
Lighting
Street trees
Bike parking
Slower traffic
speeds
On-street
physically...

Other (please
specify)
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-40
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

65.6% 40

29.5% 18

31.1% 19

14.8% 9

8.2% 5

31.1% 19

23.0% 14

27.9% 17

36.1% 22

9.8% 6
#
Total Respondents: 61

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 a skate park cuz I like skating 10/5/2021 1:56 PM
2 no uselessness 10/5/2021 1:52 PM
3 Trash 10/5/2021 1:49 PM
4 I don't live in El Monte 8/21/2021 2:49 PM
5 Not they private property 7/20/2021 4:45 AM
6 enforced Bike traffic laws. Keep people from causing traffic problems because bikes seem to believe the world should stop for them when they dont obey laws
6/15/2021 1:52 AM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
On-street physically separated bike lanes
Slower traffic speeds
Bike parking
Street trees
Lighting
Electric scooter share
Electric bike (e-bike) share
Bike share
Off-street bike paths
On-street bike lanes
Appendix A
A-41
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
26 / 36
Q12 What would make it easier for you to use a wheelchair or to get to and around El Monte? Answered: 44 Skipped: 37

31.8% 31.8%

38.6% 38.6%

27.3% 27.3%

15.9% 15.9%

13.6% 13.6%

22.7% 22.7%

6.8% 6.8%

13.6% 13.6%

52.3% 52.3%

2.3% 2.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Continuous
Repair of
sidewalks
damaged...

ADA curb ramps
(slope leadi...

Marked
crosswalks...

Reducing speed
Street
of cars
lighting
Street
trees/parkways
Wider sidewalks
I don’t use a
wheelchair
Other (please
specify)
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-42
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey

31.8% 14

38.6% 17

27.3% 12

15.9% 7

13.6% 6

22.7% 10

6.8% 3

13.6% 6

52.3% 23

2.3% 1
#
Total Respondents: 44

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Judy Blood 5/17/2021 8:19 PM

ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Other (please specify)
I don’t use a wheelchair
Wider sidewalks
Street trees/parkways
Street lighting
Reducing speed of cars
Marked crosswalks (clearly painted lines on pavement)
ADA curb ramps (slope leading to street from sidewalk)
Repair of damaged sidewalks
Continuous sidewalks
Appendix A
A-43
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
28 / 36
Q13 How safe do you feel when using these modes?
Answered: 68 Skipped: 13

14.1% 14.1%

21.0% 21.0%

18.8% 18.8%

46.9% 46.9%

59.7% 59.7%

50.0% 50.0%

39.1% 39.1%

19.4% 19.4%

31.3% 31.3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
I do not feel… Somewhat … Very Safe
Biking
Walking
Wheelchair
Vision Zero Action Plan
A-44
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
29 / 36

39.1%
25 46.9%
30 14.1%
9 64 2.50

19.4%
12 59.7%
37 21.0%
13 62 3.03

31.3%
10 50.0%
16 18.8%
6 32 2.75

I DO NOT FEEL SAFE AT ALL SOMEWHAT SAFE VERY SAFE TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE Wheelchair
Walking
Biking
Appendix A
A-45
El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey
30 / 36
Q14 Do you have any additional comments?
Answered: 18 Skipped: 63
# RESPONSES DATE
1 need more lighting and wider to feel safer 10/6/2021 9:35 AM 2 homelessness; lack of lighting, no tree shades; no safe crossing and car speed is too fast 10/5/2021 3:13 PM 3 more security to be able to walk 10/5/2021 3:05 PM
4 I like to thank the City for resurfacing the intersection of Ramona/Valley 10/5/2021 2:57 PM 5 lots of transients scaring away clients, pedestrians. Transients jump in front of me while driving in the street. 10/5/2021 2:40 PM 6 more police patrols 10/5/2021 2:27 PM
7 clean up the sidewalk more 10/5/2021 2:13 PM
8 vehicles pulling in and out of driveways, people on bicycles or scooter, and not ADA safe or friendly for wheelchair users.

There needs to be bike lane on Santa Anita between Garvey Ave and Fern Ave. It’s dangerous for pedestrians walking, 10/3/2021 8:33 PM 9 residents or fire accrues only they the exchange at gateway Are children out in danger with these transients running the streets using easement abatement access that should be for 7/20/2021 4:45 AM 10 outside the lanes already made for th
We shouldnt spend millions to make special accommodations for Bikes when they wont follow rules anyways. They ride em, they also impede traffic by not staying right when they are to share the road with dont obey traffic stops and dont wait for the car in front of them to make their turns. cars. They also cause more of their own accidents by not stopping at light or failure to yield to traffic.. Ticket riders who 6/15/2021 1:52 AM
11 The city should install protected bike lanes to El Monte Station, not sharrows. I still get honked at riding on Ramona with Sharrows (shared lane markings)
6/7/2021 3:54 PM
12 Trash pick up on sidewalks, mattresses, couches& tires etc. 5/18/2021 9:16 AM 13 Filthy Town! They only broom and Cady Main street. Was true 30 yrs. Ago, and some how they're doing it again. 5/18/2021 7:42 AM 14 There are several streets that don't have sidewalks, and many residential streets need repaving 5/17/2021 8:19 PM 15 I walk everyday (2-4 miles) and at least once I week cars run through stop signs without slowing down. 5/11/2021 8:40 PM 16 LASD and may not be in the
were multiple injury accidents. However, that intersection is a shared jurisdiction zone meaning some reports likely live with Looking at the incident map, the data seems misleading for the Arden Dr./Lower Azusa intersection. In 2018 alone there map. The uncontrolled left turns there result in multiple incidents annually. 5/11/2021 12:43 PM
17 I would like to see protected bike lanes and more trees in El Monte 5/6/2021 4:44 PM El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan Survey 18 also needs to be more trolley signs for the El Monte Trolley Routes. A lot of the stops or pick up sites don't have signage.

Please take into consideration wider sidewalks so that wide wheelchairs can maneuver around signs/lights/poles. There 5/6/2021 2:59 PM

1 2.5

CITY OF EL MONTE

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2022
February 9, 2022
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of El Monte
11333 Valley Boulevard
El Monte, CA 91731
Dear Mayor and City Council:

CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE A $2.2 MILLION LOAN TO

PRIMA DEVELOPMENT A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT

CORPORATION FOR PREDEVELOPMENT COSTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF A 6.11 ACRE

PORTION OF THE MACLAREN HALL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOCATED AT 4024 DURFEE AVENUE, UTILIZING AMERICAN

RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA) FUNDS PREVIOUSLY ALLOCATED BY CITY COUNCIL

FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE AND TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO

MAKE ALL CONFORMING EDITS, FINALIZE, AND EXECUTE IN FINAL FORM THE

PREDEVELOPMENT LOAN AGREEMENT, PROMISSORY NOTE AND ASSIGNMENT

OF AGREEMENTS, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:

1. Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing a Predevelopment Loan of $2.2 million to Prima Development for costs related to predevelopment work for the proposed affordable housing and mixed use development of a 6.11 acre portion of the Maclaren Hall property owned by the County of Los Angeles, located at 4024 Durfee Avenue from $2.6 million of ARPA funds previously allocated by the City Council for development of the site; and

2. Approve the terms and authorize the City Manager, or her designee to make all conforming edits, finalize, and execute in final form the Predevelopment Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Assignment of Agreements, Plans and Specifications (together, "Loan Documents") (Attachment 2) by and between the City of El Monte and Prima Development to effectuate the loan.

12.6 13.1

14.1 14.2

14. 3

14. 4

14. 5

14. 6

14. 7

El Monte City CouncilFebruary 15, 2022

El Monte City Council
February 15, 2022