Cities Index.
ACTC Presentation - March 15 Council.pdf

Emeryville City Council
March 15, 2022

Document
ACTC Presentation - March 15 Council.pdf
Meeting
March 15, 2022
Body
Emeryville City Council
Original file
1.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on emeryville.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 1

ALAMEDA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
San Pablo Avenue
Multimodal Corridor Project
Emeryville City Council
March 15, 2022
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 2
San Pablo Corridor Project
➢ Enhance safety for all travel modes
➢ Improve comfort and quality of trips for all users
➢ Support a strong local economy and efficiently accommodate growth along the corridor while respecting local contexts
➢ Promote equitable transportation and design solutions for diverse communities throughout corridor San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 3
Phase 1 Engagement: Survey Results
Bus lanes on SPA
(A & B)
Bike Lanes on SPA
(A & C)
Existing
Conditions
City % % %
Oakland 78% 66% 4%
Emeryville 70% 50% 6%
Berkeley 55% 39% 26%
Albany 45% 29% 32%
Contra Costa Co. 43-47% 32-36% 28-36%
Question: Which of the options would you prefer for San Pablo Avenue? Please select one. * Source: Phase 1 Online survey – Spring-Summer 2019
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 4
San Pablo Avenue Phase 2 Project Overview
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 5
Emeryville Project Overview
(also includes Oakland and southern Berkeley)
• Convert outside traffic lane in each direction to a side-running dedicated bus lane ➢ Between 20th and Ashby Avenue
• Pedestrian safety enhancements
Proposed Typical Mid-Block Cross-section
• Convert parking lane to a
protected bike facility
➢ Between 16th and Heinz Ave
➢ Special considerations are
needed at right-turn locations
and in areas where loading
needs cannot be met off San
Pablo
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 6
Project Map
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 7
Design Parameters
Goal: Expedite delivery to address safety, efficiency and placemaking in near-term (deliver in 3-5 years)
• Utilize a streamlined Caltrans review and approvals process • Minimize curb, median and landscaping modifications
• Balance demands on right-of-way
➢ Design the most protected bus and bicycle facilities possible on San Pablo ➢ Accommodate continued access to existing businesses, residences, and other corridor uses, including ADA accessibility
➢ Meet corridor circulation needs, including for bus and truck circulation, and minimize diversion to other streets
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 8
Near-Term Bus/Bike Design
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 9
Design Issues Overview
• Constraints at intersections
Right turns shared with buses;
rights shared with bike lane at
limited locations to preserve
bus performance
➢ Key intersections:
40th Street
Adeline/MacArthur
• Targeted, Limited-Location
Loading Zones, bikes share with
buses in most cases
• Paratransit/ADA access must
be accommodated
• Hybrid bus stop spacing, ~1/3
mile; bikes go on sidewalk
behind bus stop (remove stop
at 47th)
For near-term project feasibility, need to balance right-ofway demands with minimizing curb and median changes San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 10
Right Turn Designs
Typical Design - Where possible autos will make
right turns from bus lane - Should not degrade bus reliability in locations where turn volumes
and ped volumes are
medium/low
- In locations with high right turn
volumes, need vehicles out of
bus lane to preserve bus
performance
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 11
Right Turn Designs
Alternative Treatments for Consideration
• Right turning vehicles share with bike
➢ One potential Emeryville location: Adeline
- Prohibit right turns with alternate routes
- E.g. Northbound to 40th Street
- Explored other ideas suggested by active
transportation stakeholders, but all have
major tradeoffs for transit, peds, diversions
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 12
Parking and Loading Conditions
• 135 parking spaces on SPA in Emeryville
➢ Few loading spaces on San Pablo Ave (no yellow/white, 7 green) • Most trucks double-park, loading occurs throughout day • Occupancy is low
➢ On San Pablo: 43% occupancy (weekday mid-day and evening 2021) ➢ Side Streets: 56-65% (depending on time of day/week)
➢ Some very localized block segments with higher utilization ➢ Peak parking demand down in 2021 compared to 2017 (up to 25% lower) • Vast majority of parcels front a side-street and/or have off-street parking
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 13
Storefront Outreach
• Door-to-door outreach to all storefronts Dec 9-21, 2021 and Jan 3-21, 2022
• Walked entire corridor in Oakland & Emeryville
• 82 surveys completed
• Dropped flyers at other addresses and attempted phone calls/emails where possible
Emeryville
Occupied storefronts 45
Completed surveys 21
Percentage 47%
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 14
Storefront Survey Results
Emeryville
A 43%
B 38%
C 19%
Total
surveyed 21
A: Supportive - Business does not object to
moving loading/parking.

B: Mixed - Business has concerns with moving
loading/ parking, but based on survey we
think workable solution is possible.

C: Opposed - Business does not agree with
plans to move loading/parking, and we
agree that there aren’t any good options.

San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 15
Storefront Outreach Key Takeaways
• Almost all locations appear to survey team to have a
loading/parking solution, but more engagement and detailed design needed to refine solution details
• Key challenges include:
➢ Distance and convenience for deliveries, likelihood that deliveries happen on SPA anyway
➢ Safety, security, encampments, and residential parking on side streets ➢ Many potentially workable solutions have caveats that would need to be worked out case-by-case
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 16
Criteria for designating loading zones
on San Pablo
• Emeryville criteria: Mid-block, commercial parcel, no off-street lot, includes 2 block faces (12%) in Emeryville
➢ 43rd-45th east side
➢ Adeline to 40th east side
• All “C” (no solution) locations from outreach are on these blocks • Final decisions on loading zones will be made during preliminary engineering in summer 2022, will consider factors including:
➢ Side-street loading zone is too far away
➢ Limitation on side street truck circulation due to truck type or street design/width ➢ Off-street lot inadequate for loading activities
➢ Personal safety and security concerns on side-streets San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 17
Parking/Loading Designs
• For Consideration
• Small segment shared bus/bike lane
• Working with active transportation
stakeholders and AC Transit and
Caltrans on alternative designs, but
options limited
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 18
Design Issues Summary
• Bike lane will provide significant benefit, but will include some mixing zones
• Bus lane will provide significant benefit but there will be some encroachment in the lane; robust enforcement will be needed • Hybrid stop spacing is required to minimize bus/bike mixing • Moving parking/loading off San Pablo feasible at most locations; some targeted loading zones needed; will continue to work with storefronts to address concerns
• Need design to address paratransit/ADA access needs
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 19
Transit & Traffic: Preliminary Results
• Transit travel time reliability improves by over 50%
• Increase in congestion/diversions greatest at 40th Street; systemwide impact • Macarthur, Alcatraz also congestion hot spots
AM Peak Period PM Peak Period
Travel Time Comparison, Build vs No Build (%)
72R -10% to -20% -15% to -20%
Auto +3% to +5% +5% to +10%
Diversion Percentage (with one left turn pocket at 40th Street) Albany/Berkeley 3% 3%
Oakland/Emeryville 15%-30% 20%-30%
Planning for dual left
turn lane at 40th to
reduce diversion
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 20
Racial Equity Analysis
• AC Transit ridership is 75% people of color and 71% low income • Diverse, low-income corridor, compared to rest of
Oakland/Emeryville:
➢ Residents use transit, walking, and biking more
➢ Population is lower income and more transit reliant
• Proposed project improvements were developed in response to clear desire from community for safety and transit improvements ➢ Extensive community engagement included diverse stakeholders with racial equity, transit rider, and disability-focused outreach San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 21
Phase 2 Project Engagement
• One-on-one storefront engagement
• Community organization presentations and partnerships • Active Transportation Working Group
• City, AC Transit, EBP advisory committees
➢ AC Transit Accessibility Advisory Committee
➢ East Bay Paratransit Service Review Advisory Committee ➢ City Transportation Commissions, BPACs, etc.
• Additional outreach during design, construction, evaluation San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 22
Next Steps: Project Roadmap
• March 2022: Recommend project to advance to ensure
eligibility for funding opportunities
• Spring/Summer 2022: Apply for construction funding
• Summer 2022: Advance preliminary engineering including targeted outreach on design issues
• 2022-23: Caltrans approvals, environmental review, final design
• Goal: Deliver project in 3-5 years (pending full funding) San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 23
Recommendation
• Convert outside traffic lane in each direction to a side-running dedicated bus lane ➢ Between 20th and Ashby Avenue
• Pedestrian safety enhancements
Proposed Typical Mid-Block Cross-section
• Convert parking lane to a
protected bike facility
➢ Between 16th and Heinz Ave
➢ Special considerations are
needed at right-turn locations
and in areas where loading
needs cannot be met off San
Pablo
San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project 24
Discussion

← All documents from this meeting